41590 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 130 / Thursday, July 6, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

(d)(1)(i)(A) of this section) and for

increased rate of weight gain and

improved feed efficiency in growing/

finishing swine.

(B) Limitations. Feed as sole ration.

Under conditions of continued exposure

to parasites, retreatment may be needed

after 4 to 6 weeks. Consult your

veterinarian for assistance in the

diagnosis, treatment, and control of

parasitism. Bacitracin methylene

disalicylate as provided by 046573 in

§ 510.600(c) of this chapter.

(vii) Amount. Fenbendazole, 10 to 300

grams per ton, and bacitracin methylene

disalicylate, 250 grams per ton.

(A) Indications for use—(1) Growing/

finishing swine. As an anthelmintic (as

provided in paragraph (d)(1)(i)(A) of this

section) and for control of swine

dysentery associated withTreponema

hyodysenteriae on premises with a

history of swine dysentery, but where

signs of disease have not yet occurred;

or following an approved treatment of

the disease condition.

(2) Pregnant sows. As an anthelmintic

(as provided in paragraph (d)(1)(i)(A) of

this section) and for control of

clostridial enteritis in suckling pigs

caused by Clostridium perfringens.

(B) Limitations—(1)Growing/finishing

swine. Feed as sole ration. Not for use

in growing and finishing swine that

weigh more than 250 pounds. Diagnosis

of swine dysentery should be confirmed

by a veterinarian when results are not

satisfactory. Under conditions of

continued exposure to parasites,

retreatment may be needed after 4 to 6

weeks. Consult your veterinarian for

assistance in the diagnosis, treatment,

and control of parasitism. Bacitracin

methylene disalicylate as provided by

046573 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.

(2) Pregnant sows. Feed as sole ration.

Diagnosis of clostridial enteritis should

be confirmed by a veterinarian when

results are not satisfactory. Under

conditions of continued exposure to

parasites, retreatment may be needed

after 4 to 6 weeks. Consult your

veterinarian for assistance in the

diagnosis, treatment, and control of

parasitism. Bacitracin methylene

disalicylate as provided by 046573 in

§ 510.600(c) of this chapter.

* * * * *

Dated: June 19, 2000.

Stephen F. Sundlof,

Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.

[FR Doc. 00–17020 Filed 7–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160–01–F

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD13–00–022]

RIN 2115–AA97

Safety Zone Regulations, Seafair Blue

Angels Performance, Lake

Washington, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is

establishing a temporary safety zone on

the waters of Lake Washington, Seattle,

Washington. The Coast Guard is taking

this action to safeguard the participants

and spectators from the safety hazards

associated with Seafair Blue Angels

Performance. Entry into this zone is

prohibited unless authorized by the

Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or his

designated representatives.

DATES: This is effective from 8:30 a.m.

Pacific Daylight Time on August 3

through 3 p.m. on August 6, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Documents as indicated in

this preamble are available for

inspection or copying at the U.S. Coast

Guard Marine Safety Office Puget

Sound, 1519 Alaskan Way South,

Building 1, Seattle, Washington 98134.

Normal office hours are between 7 a.m.

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT

Paul Stocklin, c/o Captain of the Port

Puget Sound, 1519 Alaskan Way South,

Seattle, Washington 98134, (206) 217–

6232.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background and Purpose

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, a notice of

proposed rulemaking has not been

published for this regulation and good

cause exists for making it effective less

than 30 days from date of publication in

the Federal Register. Due to complex

planning and coordination

requirements, the Coast Guard was not

able to obtain details of the event thirty

days prior to its occurrence. Because of

this, following normal rulemaking

procedures would be impracticable and

contrary to the public interest. Prompt

regulatory action is needed in order to

provide for the safety of spectators and

participants during the event. If normal

notice and comment procedures were

followed, this rule would not become

effective until after the date of the event.

For this reason, following normal

rulemaking procedures in this case

would be impracticable and contrary to

the public interest.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

The Coast Guard is adopting a

temporary safety zone regulation on the

waters of Lake Washington, Seattle,

Washington, for the Seafair Blue Angels

Performance. The Coast Guard has

determined it is necessary to close the

area in the vicinity of the air show in

order to minimize the dangers that lowflying aircraft present to persons and

vessels. These dangers include, but are

not limited to excessive noise and the

risk of falling objects from any accidents

associated with low flying aircraft. In

the event that aircraft require emergency

assistance, rescuers must have

immediate and unencumbered access to

the craft. The Coast Guard, through this

action, intends to promote the safety of

personnel, vessels, and facilities in the

area. Entry into this zone will be

prohibited unless authorized by the

Captain of the Port. This safety zone

will be enforced by Coast Guard

personnel. The Captain of the Port may

be assisted by other federal, state, or

local agencies.

Regulatory Evaluation

This proposed rule is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866

and does not require an assessment of

potential costs and benefits under

section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office

of Management and Budget has not

reviewed it under that Order. It is not

significant under the regulatory policies

and procedures of the Department of

Transportation (DOT)(44 FR 11040,

February 26, 1979). We expect the

economic impact of this proposed rule

to be so minimal that a full Regulatory

Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of the

regulatory policies and procedures of

DOT is unnecessary. This expectation is

based on the fact that the regulated area

established by the proposed regulation

would encompass an area near the

middle of Lake Washington, not

frequented by commercial navigation.

The regulation is established for the

benefit and safety of the recreational

boating public, and any recreational

boating impact is offset by the benefits

of allowing the Blue Angels to fly. For

the above reasons, the Coast Guard does

not anticipate any significant economic

impact.

Small Entities

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Coast Guard

considered whether this rule would

have a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 130 / Thursday, July 6, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 41591

‘‘Small entities’’ include small

businesses, not-for-profit organizations

that are independently owned and

operated and are not dominant in their

fields, and governmental jurisdictions

with populations of less than 50,000.

This rule will affect the following

entities, some of which may be small

entities: the owners or operators of

vessels intending to transit this portion

of Lake Washington from 8:30 a.m. until

3 p.m., Pacific Daylight Time, August

3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th, 2000. The zone

will not have a significant economic

impact due to its short duration and

small area. It is believed that the only

vessels likely to be impacted will be

recreational boaters and small passenger

vessel operators. The event is held for

the benefit and entertainment of those

above categories. Because the impacts of

this proposal are expected to be so

minimal, the Coast Guard certifies

under 605(b) of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) that

this final rule will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities.

If you think that your business,

organization, or governmental

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity

and that this rule would have a

significant economic impact on it,

please submit a comment (see

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it

qualifies and how and to what degree

this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

Under section 213(a) of the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),

we want to assist small entities in

understanding this proposed rule so that

they can better evaluate its effects on

them and participate in the rulemaking.

If the rule would affect your small

business, organization, or governmental

jurisdiction and you have questions

concerning its provisions or options for

compliance, please contact the person

listed in the (FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT) section.

Collection of Information

This proposed rule would call for no

new collection of information under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44

U.S.C. 3501–3520).

Federalism

We have analyzed this proposed rule

under E.O. 13132 and have determined

that this rule does not have implications

for federalism under that Order.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) governs

the issuance of Federal regulations that

require unfunded mandates. An

unfunded mandate is a regulation that

requires a State, local, or tribal

government or the private sector to

incur direct costs without the Federal

Government’s having first provided the

funds to pay those costs. This proposed

rule would not impose an unfunded

mandate.

Taking of Private Property

This proposed rule would not effect a

taking of private property or otherwise

have taking implications under E.O.

12630, Governmental Actions and

Interference with Constitutionally

Protected Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

This proposed rule meets applicable

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of

E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to

minimize litigation, eliminate

ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

We have analyzed this proposed rule

under E.O. 13045, Protection of

Children from Environmental Health

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not

an economically significant rule and

does not concern an environmental risk

to health or risk to safety that may

disproportionately affect children.

Environment

We considered the environmental

impact of this proposed rule and

concluded that, under figure 2–1,

paragraph (34)(g) of Commandant

Instruction M16475.lC, this proposed

rule is categorically excluded from

further environmental documentation.

A Categorical Exclusion is provided for

temporary safety zones of less than one

week in duration. This rule establishes

a temporary safety zone of limited

duration which will be within the oneweek timeframe.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Security measures,

Waterways.

Final Rule

For the reasons set out in the

preamble, the Coast Guard amends part

165 of Title 33, Code of Federal

Regulations, as follows:

PART 165—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for Part 165

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;

33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;

49 CFR 1.46.

2. From 8:30 a.m. on August 3

through 3 p.m. on August 6, 2000, a

temporary § 165.T13–020 is added to

read as follows:

§ 165.T13–020 Safety Zone Regulations,

Seafair Blue Angels Performance, Seattle,

WA.

(a) Location. The following area is a

safety zone: All waters of Lake

Washington, Washington State,

enclosed by the following points: All

waters of Lake Washington, Washington

State, enclosed by the following points:

The North-West corner of Faben Point at

47°35′′34.5′′ N, 122°15′′13′′ W; thence to

47°35′′48′′ N, 122°15′′45′′ W; thence to

47°36′′32′′ N, 122°15′′59′′ W; thence to

47°36′′26′′ N, 122°16′′ 38′′ W, thence to

47° 35′′42′′ N, 122°16′′24′′ W, thence to

the East side of the entrance to the West

highrise of the Interstate 90 bridge,

thence Easterly along the South side of

the bridge to a point 1130 yards East of

the Western terminus of the bridge,

thence Southerly to a point in Andrews

bay at 47°33′′06′′ N, 122°15′′32′′ W,

thence North-East along the shoreline of

Bailey Peninsula to its North-East point

at 47°33′′44′′ N, 122°15′′04′′ W, thence

Easterly along the East-West line drawn

tangent to Bailey Peninsula, thence

northerly along the shoreline of Mercer

Island to the point of origin. [Datum:

NAD 1983]

(b) Regulations. In accordance with

the general regulations in Section

165.23 of this part, no person or vessel

may enter or remain in the race course

portion of this zone, except for

participants in the event, supporting

personnel, vessels registered with the

event organizer, or other vessels

authorized by the Captain of the Port or

his designated representatives. Vessels

entering the spectator portion of the

Safety Zone must proceed at a slow nowake speed and, upon notice, shall obey

the lawful order or direction of the

Captain of the Port or his designated

representatives.

(c) Applicable dates. This section

applies from 8:30 a.m. until 3 p.m.,

Pacific Daylight Time, on August 3, 4,

5 and 6, 2000.

Dated: June 28, 2000.

M.R. Moore,

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the

Port, Puget Sound.

[FR Doc. 00–17042 Filed 6–30–00; 4:24 pm]

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P