alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

July 11, 2000 at 2 p.m. 

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# STATUS:

Open to the public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

 

1. Agenda for future meeting: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. TA-201-71 (Crabmeat from Swimming Crabs)(Injury Phase)—briefing and vote. (The Commission will transmit its recommendations to the President on August 29, 2000.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: none. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: June 29, 2000.
      ( print page 41490)    
By order of the Commission

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-17041 Filed 6-30-00; 12:58 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[112th Congress Public Law 157]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1213]]

Public Law 112-157
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Tribe 
     to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
             tribe. <<NOTE: Aug. 10, 2012 -  [H.R. 1560]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BLOOD QUANTUM REQUIREMENT DETERMINED BY TRIBE.

    Section 108(a)(2) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 
Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g-
7(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) any person of Tigua Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Indian blood 
        enrolled by the tribe.''.

    Approved August 10, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1560:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-222 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 157 (2011):
                                    Dec. 5, 7, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 158 (2012):
                                    Aug. 1, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4205 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4205

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
  To amend title 11, D.C. Code, to clarify that blind individuals are 
 eligible to serve as jurors in the Superior Court of the District of 
                               Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF BLIND INDIVIDUALS TO SERVE 
              AS JURORS IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    Section 11-1906(b), D.C. Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
    ``(4) An individual who is blind may not be disqualified from 
serving as a juror solely on the basis of blindness, but may be 
disqualified from serving as a juror in a particular case if the 
individual's blindness makes the individual incapable of rendering 
satisfactory jury service in that case.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.
                                     







103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4205

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend title 11, D.C. Code, to clarify that blind individuals are 
 eligible to serve as jurors in the Superior Court of the District of 
                               Columbia.`
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          46,021
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    798,030
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,087
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,100
<LOANS>                                      1,828,315
<ALLOWANCE>                                     26,002
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,812,384
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,740,824
<SHORT-TERM>                                   396,886
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             31,396
<LONG-TERM>                                    389,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           199
<OTHER-SE>                                     254,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,812,384
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                142,815
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               48,553
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               191,368
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              80,155
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,517
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           72,851
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    7,099
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 624
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 52,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,999
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,980
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.41
<LOANS-NON>                                     17,189
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                12,505
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                27,721
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,110
<RECOVERIES>                                       292
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               26,002
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            26,002
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------


                   SUBSIDIARIES OF NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT, INC.
                   ------------------------------------------


                                                             Percent Owned
                                  State of                   by National Auto
Corporate Name                  Organization                 Credit, Inc.
----------------                ------------                 ----------------

ARAC, Inc. (1)                  Delaware                       100%

NAC Capital, Inc.               Delaware                       100%

NAC, Inc. (2)                   Delaware                       100%

     All of the subsidiaries listed above are included in the consolidated
financial statements of the Company. The Company also has various subsidiaries
which, when considered in the aggregate, do not constitute a significant
subsidiary.


(1)  Formerly operated under the name of Agency Rent-A-Car and its divisions,
     Altra Auto Rental, Automate Auto Rental and National Motors.

(2)  NAC, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARAC, Inc.
No. 11-5214.

#### Frederick *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"20-2331: ALMIRALL, LLC v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Wwnd5FvBuv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-14-2022-20-2331-almirall-llc-v-amneal-pharmaceuticals-llc-opinion-20-2331-opinion-3-14-2022_1920940\/\">20-2331: ALMIRALL, LLC v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-14-2022-20-2331-almirall-llc-v-amneal-pharmaceuticals-llc-opinion-20-2331-opinion-3-14-2022_1920940\/embed\/#?secret=Wwnd5FvBuv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“20-2331: ALMIRALL, LLC v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Wwnd5FvBuv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: ALMIRALL, LLC v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 20-2331 Origin: PTO Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

# Certification of Chief
Executive Officer Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Amendment No.
2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
Report), by SPAR Group, Inc. (the Registrant), the undersigned
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

| | /s/ Robert G. Brown
Robert G. Brown
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Date: June 21, 2006
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be
retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

8
3000 NE 30th Place, Suite 107, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33306 USA

Ph. +1.954.763.4848 Fax +1.954.763.4240 info@aviation-professionals.com

February 28, 2013

United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”)

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

United States of America (“USA”)

Re: Supplemental Information for the Application for an Exemption of Tortug’Air S.A., 

DOT-OST-2013-0003 

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

The Aviation Professionals Group, Inc. (“APG”) are the duly authorized aviation 

regulatory representatives of Tortug’Air S.A. (“Tortug”), located in the Republic of Haiti 

(“Haiti”). We have been asked to provide the following supplementary information 

pursuant to the ownership structure of Clear Water Supply:

1. Clear Water Supply is owned by Mr. Reynold Deeb and Mr. Thierry Mayard-Paul, 

both citizens of the Republic of Haiti, which by virtue of their ownership of Clear 

Water Supply each effectively own more than 5% of Tortug

2. The address of Clear Water Supply is:

DEKA Building

Boulevard Toussaint Louverture

Rue Barbancourt

Port Au Prince, Haiti W.I.

Respectfully submitted:

AVIATION PROFESSIONALS GROUP, INC.

(by and for Tortug)

 

C.A. Southerland

President
Blueprint





 











 Exhibit 10.2



 



Amendment to Convertible Note


 


Reference is made
to that certain 6% Convertible Note made by Smart Server, Inc. (the
"Company") in favor of Berrard Holdings Limited Partnership (the
“Holder”) dated July 13, 2016 and having and aggregate
principal amount of $191,858.25 (the
“Note”).


 


For
good and valuable consideration, including the funding by Holder of
the Company's bank account with Wells Fargo, N.A. in the amount of
$5,000.00 and the payment by Holder of certain invoices of the
Company in the amount of $500.00, the Company and Holder hereby
agree that the aggregate principal amount of the note shall be
increased by $5,500.00 such that the new aggregate principal amount
of the Note shall be $197,358.25, effective as of August 31, 2016.
Other than as expressly set forth herein, all other terms of the
Note remain unchanged.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to
Note as of the date first above written.


 


 


	
 

	

SMART
SERVER, INC.


a
Nevada corporation


 


 


	
 

	

By:
/s/ Steven
Berrard               




Name:
Steven R. Berrard


Title:
Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-5166.

#### Chinsammy *v.*United States.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### William Armes *vs.*United Electric Railways Company. Mary Armes *vs.*Same.

NOVEMBER 12, 1948.

Present: Flynn, C. J., Capotosto, Baker, Condon and O’Connell, JJ.

*451Condon, J.

These are actions of trespass on the case for negligence which were tried together to a jury in the superior court and resulted in a verdict of $6000 for plaintiff Mary Armes and of $1250 for plaintiff William Armes. On defendant’s motion the trial justice ordered a new trial in each case unless plaintiff Mary Armes filed a remittitur of all of her verdict in excess of $5000, and unless plaintiff William Armes remitted all of his verdict in excess of $600. Each plaintiff excepted to such decision and has prosecuted a bill of exceptions to this court.

The sole question raised by these bills of exceptions is whether the trial justice was clearly wrong either in finding that each verdict was grossly excessive or in the extent to which he reduced it. We have frequently said that it is the duty of the trial justice, on a motion for a new trial, to revise the jury’s award of damages whenever in the exercise of his independent judgment of the evidence it appears that the award is grossly excessive or inadequate. And we have further said that when he thus exercises his *452judgment and revises the verdict we will not disturb his decision merely because we might have made a somewhat larger or smaller reduction if we were in his place. *Beaumier*v. *Provensal,*58 R. I. 472; *Joseph*v. *Di Guilio,*60 R. I. 286. In other words, in reviewing the trial justice’s revision of the damages, as in reviewing his decision as to whether they are grossly excessive, this court applies the rule that it will not disturb his decision unless it is clearly wrong.

*Carroll & Dwyer, Edward F. J. Dwyer,*for plaintiffs.

*Earl A. Sweeney, Frank J. McGee,*for defendant.

In the circumstances here there is no occasion to discuss the evidence. It is sufficient to say that we have examined the transcript with especial reference to the evidence bearing on the damages in each case, and we are of the opinion that nothing appears therein that would warrant our saying that the trial justice was clearly wrong either in his finding that the award of damages in each case was grossly excessive or in the extent to which he has revised it.

The plaintiff’s exception in each case is overruled, and each case is remitted to the superior court for a new trial unless the plaintiff shall, on or before November 26, 1948, file in the office of the clerk of the superior court a remittitur in the amount fixed by that court.
---

EXHIBIT 31(a)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT 
  TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS 
  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George Solymar, chief executive officer of Hendrx Corp. (Registrant)
  certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (Report)
  of Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
  the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
  financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material
  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
  for the Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
  such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision,
  to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
  controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
  period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants
  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants
  most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
  of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
  materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting;
  and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
  Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
  (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
  design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
  reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
  summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
  or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
  controls over financial reporting.

|Date: August 13, 2007    | 
|------------------------ | 
|                         | 
|s/s
      George Solymar | 
|George Solymar           | 
|Chief Executive Officer  | 

---
Exhibit 99


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Jaguar
Investments, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, I, Gregory Ricca,
Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Jaguar Investments, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

          (1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
               September 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of
               section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
               and

          (2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
               for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Jaguar Investments, Inc.


                                       /s/ GREGORY RICCA
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Gregory Ricca
                                       Chief Executive and Financial Officer

November 18, 2002

                                      -14-
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greater Atlantic Financial Corp.
(the "company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David E. Ritter Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

C.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

D.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.



                                            By: /s/ David E. Ritter
                                            -----------------------
                                            David E. Ritter
                                            Senior Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                            Date: February 13, 2008