alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[112th Congress Public Law 171]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1306]]

Public Law 112-171
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To require the Transportation Security Administration to comply with the 
Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. <<NOTE: Aug. 
                       16, 2012 -  [H.R. 3670]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND 
                              REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT TO THE 
                              TRANSPORTATION SECURITY 
                              ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 111(d) of the Aviation and Transportation 
Security Act (49 U.S.C. 44935 note; Public Law 107-71) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Notwithstanding'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) General authority.--Except as provided in paragraph 
        (2), and notwithstanding''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Uniformed services employment and reemployment rights 
        act.--In carrying out the functions authorized under paragraph 
        (1), the Under Secretary shall be subject to the provisions set 
        forth in chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code.''.

    (b) <<NOTE: 49 USC 44935 note.>>  Effective Date.--The amendments 
made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 270 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

    Approved August 16, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3670:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-487, Pt. 1 (Comm. on Veterans' Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            May 30, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 2, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1164: MAALOUF v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"O2mfyLSJ9V\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/02-23-2023-22-1164-maalouf-v-microsoft-corporation-opinion-22-1164-opinion-2-23-2023_2085044\/\">22-1164: MAALOUF v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/02-23-2023-22-1164-maalouf-v-microsoft-corporation-opinion-22-1164-opinion-2-23-2023_2085044\/embed\/#?secret=O2mfyLSJ9V\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1164: MAALOUF v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"O2mfyLSJ9V\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: MAALOUF v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1164 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Independent Auditors' Consent

 

 

 

The Board of Directors

Capital Accumulation Plan for

Employees of PFF Bank & Trust

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements(No. 333-20337 and No. 333-65816) on Form S-8 of PFF Bancorp, Inc. of our reportdated June 4, 2002 with respect to the statements of net assets available forbenefits of the Capital Accumulation Plan for Employees of PFF Bank & Trustas of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the related statement of changes in net assetsavailable for benefits for the years then ended and the supplemental schedule,which report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 11-K of theCapital Accumulation Plan for Employees of PFF Bank & Trust.

 

Orange County, California

June 27, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 25, 2013

s0617 

# Order

Clerk June 25, 2013

146229

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146229

COA: 310548

Saginaw CC: 06

- 027120

- FJ

DEONDRE DEQWAINE GAINES

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
701 North Terminal Road Greensboro, NC 27409 336 - 896 - 0400 – phone 540 - 515 - 3937 – fax 

### Mr. Richard C a novai . Principal Maintenance Inspector FAA, Flight Standards District Office 1301 South Terminal Service Road Greensboro, North Carolina 27409 (336) 369 - 3910, Fax: (336) 369 - 3980 **Subject: Ad** **justment of Compliance time for Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) parts 25, 26,**  **121, specifically**

**14CFR 121.1117 for U.S. A ir Carriers.**  Dynamic Airways is hereby requesting an Adjustment of Compliance time fo r 14CFR121.1117 Reduction of Fuel Tank Flammability in Transport Category Airplanes . This request is for Dynamic Airways aircraft N254MY Model 767 - 336ER; S/N 25443; Line 419; Variable VN123. Dynamic Airways would like to extend the Compliance date no la ter than December 26, 2017 fo r the airplane listed. **Background :**  Th e parts Kit required to accomplish this AD is not available within the compliance time, which is December 26 th 2014. Dynamic Airways PO # 10471 has been issued to purchase top kit from Boeing. Dynamic is proposing to comply with requirements outlined in 14CFR121.1117(k) : (k ) The compliance dates specified in paragraph (e) of this section may be extended by one year, provided that— (1) No later than March 26, 2009, the certificate holder notifies its assigned Flight Standards Office or Principal Inspector that it intends to comply with this paragraph; (2) No later than June 24, 2009, the certificate holder applies for an amendment to its operations specification in accordance with §119.51 of this chapter and revises the manual required by §121.133 to include a requirement for the airplane models specified in Table 2 of this section to use ground air conditioning systems for actual gate times of more than 30 minutes, when available a t the gate and operational, whenever the ambient temperature exceeds 60 degrees Fahrenheit; and (3) Thereafter, the certificate holder uses ground air conditioning systems as described in paragraph (k)(2) of this section on each airplane subject to the extension.**T AB**  **LE 2** 



### Model**— Boeing**  **Model —**  **Airbus** 747 Series A318, A319, A320, A321 Series 737 Series A300, A310 Series 777 Series A330, A340 Series 767 Series 757 Series (l) For any certificate holder for which the operating certificate is issued after December 26, 2008, the compliance date specified in paragraph (e) of this section may be extended by one year, provided that the certificate holder meets the requirements of paragraph (k)(2) of this section when its initial operations specifications are is sued and, thereafter, uses ground air conditioning s ys tems as described in paragraph (k)(2) of this section on each airplane subject to the extension.
If you have any question please don’t hesitate to contact me at 336 - 681 - 3591 . 

### Steven L. Kellenburger Director of Quality Dynamic Airways 336 - 681 - 3591
CC: Bill Gray , COO Mike Steinke , Director of Maintenance
EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greater Atlantic Financial
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David E. Ritter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        A.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        B.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects,  the financial  condition and results of
            operations of the Company.





                                          By: /s/ David E. Ritter
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          David E. Ritter
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          August 6, 2002
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Bu Shengfu                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |
| Bu                Shengfu                              |
| President                (Principal Executive Officer) |
| August                19, 2008                         |
|                                                   |
| /s/                Liang Zhu                           |
|                                                   |
| Liang                Zhu                               |
| Chief                Financial Officer                 |
| August                19, 2008                         |

----
VERIFY Schema Change Log of Changes 

Made for Non-Road Compression 

Ignition and Non-Road Spark Ignition 

Release 9.2 
VERIFY Schema Change Log of Changes
 

Made for Non-Road Compression
 

Ignition and Non-Road Spark Ignition
 

Release 9.2
 

Compliance Division 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

EPA-420-B-12-033 

April 2012 
 

 

VERIFY 

Schema Change Log of changes made for
 

Non-Road Compression Ignition and Non-Road Spark Ignition
 

Purpose 

This document identifies XML schema modifications to the VERIFY Non-Road Compression Ignition family of 

schemas. Modifications that involve the addition of new schema components were also made according to the 

current schema development paradigm per EPA XML data standard [GD2-E]. For new and modified data 

elements, the annotation following the data element name references the corresponding data element type 

description. Note that individual data elements may be used in more locations in the schemas than defined in the 

shared data element file. 

NR Modified XML Files 

EN_VER_NR_SharedDataElements_v0.95.xsd 

XML Shared Data Element and Data Type File Modifications 

The annotation following the data element name references the corresponding data element identifiers in the DR 

spreadsheet. Note that some data elements may be used in more locations in the schemas than defined in the DR 

spreadsheet. 

EN_VER_NR_SharedDataElements_v0.95.xsd 

The following data elements had their data types modified. As such, this modification has an impact to each 

schema that the associated data element is used in. 

•	 Data type Decimal7Point5PositiveType was added. 

•	 Data type for EngineMaximumTestSpeedTorqueMeasure [rpm, 0.01 to 99,999.99 (NRCI-MP117)] was 

changed to Decimal7Point2PositiveType. 

•	 Data type for TestSampleFuelLineInnerDiameterMeasure [mm, 0.00001 to 99.99999 (NRSI-EV38)] was 

changed to Decimal7Point5PositiveType. 

•	 Data type for TestSampleNonStraightLineInternalSurfaceAreaMeasure [sq. m, 0.00001 to 99.99999 

(NRSI-EV40)] was changed to Decimal7Point5PositiveType.
#### § 18.307 Conduction limits.

For the following equipment, when designed to be connected to the public utility (AC) power line the radio frequency voltage that is conducted back onto the AC power line on any frequency or frequencies shall not exceed the limits in the following tables. Compliance with the provisions of this paragraph shall be based on the measurement of the radio frequency voltage between each power line and ground at the power terminal using a 50 μH/50 ohms line impedance stabilization network (LISN).

(a) All Induction cooking ranges and ultrasonic equipment:

| Frequency of emission (MHz) | Conducted limit (dBμV) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Quasi-peak | Average |
| 0.009-0.05 | 110 | — |
| 0.05-0.15 | 90-80 \* | — |
| 0.15-0.5 | 66 to 56 \* | 56 to 46 \* |
| 0.5-5 | 56 | 46 |
| 5-30 | 60 | 50 |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \* Decreases with the logarithm of the frequency. | | |

(b) All other part 18 consumer devices:

| Frequency of emission (MHz) | Conducted limit (dBμV) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Quasi-peak | Average |
| 0.15-0.5 | 66 to 56 \* | 56 to 46 \* |
| 0.5-5 | 56 | 46 |
| 5-30 | 60 | 50 |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \* Decreases with the logarithm of the frequency. | | |

(c) RF lighting devices:

| Frequency (MHz) | Maximum RF line voltage measured with a 50 uH/50 ohm LISN (uV) |
| --- | --- |
| Non-consumer equipment: | |
| 0.45 to 1.6 | 1,000 |
| 1.6 to 30 | 3,000 |
| Consumer equipment: | |
| 0.45 to 2.51 | 250 |
| 2.51 to 3.0 | 3,000 |
| 3.0 to 30 | 250 |

(d) If testing with a quasi-peak detector demonstrates that the equipment complies with the average limits specified in the appropriate table in this section, additional testing to demonstrate compliance using an average detector is not required.

(e) These conduction limits shall apply only outside of the frequency bands specified in [§ 18.301](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-18.301).

(f) For ultrasonic equipment, compliance with the conducted limits shall preclude the need to show compliance with the field strength limits below 30 MHz unless requested by the Commission.

(g) The tighter limits shall apply at the boundary between two frequency ranges.

[[50 FR 36067](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/50-FR-36067), Sept. 5, 1985, as amended at [52 FR 43198](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/52-FR-43198), Nov. 10, 1987; [64 FR 37419](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/64-FR-37419), July 12, 1999; [67 FR 45671](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/67-FR-45671), July 10, 2002]
No. 11-1176.

#### Noreen *v.*Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 301-10.3 What methods of transportation may my agency authorize me to use? Your agency may authorize: ( a ) Common carrier transportation (e.g., aircraft, train, bus, ship, or other transit system) under subpart B;
( b ) Government vehicle under subpart C;
( c ) POV under subpart D; or
( d ) Special conveyance (e.g., taxi, TNC, innovative mobility technology company, or commercial automobile) under subpart E.
[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15955, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2010-02, 75 FR 24435, May 5, 2010; FTR Amdt. 2017-01, 83 FR 604, Jan. 5, 2018]
#### §§ 25.130-25.131 [Reserved]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1365: KELLY v. US [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"b55TM6b9mt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/05-30-2023-22-1365-kelly-v-us-opinion-22-1365-opinion-5-30-2023_2134031\/\">22-1365: KELLY v. US [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/05-30-2023-22-1365-kelly-v-us-opinion-22-1365-opinion-5-30-2023_2134031\/embed\/#?secret=b55TM6b9mt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1365: KELLY v. US [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"b55TM6b9mt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: KELLY v. US [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1365 Origin: CFC Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
EX 1022


		
			Exhibit 10.22
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			AMENDMENT TO THE 
		

		
			LIFEPOINT HEALTH, INC. 2013 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			This Amendment is made to the LifePoint Health, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) by LifePoint Health, Inc. (the “Company”), on this 23rd day of January, 2017.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Recitals:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Whereas, the Company established and maintains the Plan for the benefit of its eligible employees; 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Whereas,  the Company desires to amend the Plan’s tax withholding provisions; and
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Whereas, the Plan authorizes the Company to amend the Plan;
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Now Therefore, the Company hereby amends the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2017,  by deleting Section 10(d) in its entirety and substituting therefor the following:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			(d)Taxes.  The Company and any Related Entity are authorized to withhold from any Award granted, any payment relating to an Award under the Plan  (including from a distribution of Shares), or any payroll or other payment to a Participant, amounts of withholding and other taxes due or potentially payable in connection with any transaction involving an Award not to be in excess of the maximum applicable tax rate, and to take such other action as the Committee may deem advisable to enable the Company or any Related Entity and Participants to satisfy obligations for the payment of withholding taxes and other tax obligations relating to any Award. This authority shall include authority to withhold or receive Shares or other property and to make cash payments in respect thereof in satisfaction of a Participant's tax obligations not in excess of the maximum applicable tax rate, either on a mandatory or elective basis in the discretion of the Committee.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			[Signature on Next Page]
		

		

		

		 


		

			 

		




 

		
		

		
			In Witness Whereof, the undersigned officer of the Company has executed this Amendment on the date first written above.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			LIFEPOINT HEALTH, INC.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			By:    /s/ John P. Bumpus
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Title:    Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
No. 11-4.

#### Czarniecki *v.*City of Chicago, Illinois.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.