B y two July 200 5 indictm ent s, app ellantw as cha rg ed wi th two possession of child 1 por nog ra phy

offenses . Tex . Pe nal C ode An n. § 43.26 (V er non 200 3)
. Appel lan t pl ed g uil ty i n Apr il 2006. The t ri al cour t defer re d an adj udi cat ion of appel lan t’ s g uil t and pl aced him on com mu nity supe rv ision for a period of f iv e y ears. Af ter a failed a ttem pt to app eal, app ellantf iled an app lication, and two am end ed applicat ions, fo r w rits of hab eas co rpus. On O cto ber

29, 2007, the tr ial cour t deni ed re li ef i n each cas e. Appel lan t now att empts to appeal i n eac h of thes e c auses pursuantto Ar ti cl e 11. 072, § 8 o f the Texas Code of Cr imi nal Procedu re . Tex . C ode C ri m. Proc. Ann. ar t. 11.072, § 8 (V er non 200 3)
. NO. 07-07 -033 2-CR 07-07-03 33-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL B JAN UA RY

23, 2008

_________

_________

_________

___ EX PARTE ALBERT V. J ESSEP

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 47 DIS T RI CT COU RT OF P OT T ERCOU NT Y; TH NO . 51, 224-A, 5 1,225-A; H ON ORABLE HA L M IN ER , J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. A BA TEMENT A ND R EMA ND Ap p e lla n t A lb e rtV. Je ss e p , a ct in g pr o s e, app e a ls t h e trial court’s denia l of his re q uest s for

habeas co rp us re li ef, pursuantto arti cl e 11. 072 of the Tex as Cod e of Cr imi nal Proced ure, f rom o rders impo sing comm unity supervisi on in two p o s session of child por nog ra phy

ca ses . The c ler k’ s record was filed on S eptember 21, 2 007. A s uppl emental

1W e ac know led g e tha t s ect ion 8 of ar ti cl e 11.072 ex press ly prov ide s for appeal of 2 deni als of peti ti ons filed under that arti cl e, but find it is not neces sar il y inc onsi ste nt w it h the re q uirement of c erti ficat ion under the ru le of appell ate p ro cedure.

2 cl er k’ s record w as filed on September 28, 2007. A s econd su ppl emental cl er k’ s record was filed on O cto ber

29, 2007. Nei ther the cl er k’ s rec ord or the suppl emental cler k’ s rec ords cont ain a c erti ficat ion by the trial court of

app ellant ’s ri ght of

app eal un d er Te x as Rule of Appe llant Proce dure 25. 2(d). Rule 25 requires the t rial cou rt to e nte r such a ce rtif ication “ea ch time it ent ers a ju d gm e n to f

gu il to r o t h e r a p p e a la b l e o rd e r . ” T e x. R. A p p . P
. 2 5
. 2 (a )( 2 ). Co u rt s h a ve re q uired c erti ficat ion of the ri g ht to appeal orders d eny ing habeas co rp us re li ef under othe r prov is ion s o f Chapt er

11 o f the C ode of C ri m in a l Pr ocedu re . See M aydonv. Sta te, 141 S.W .3d 8 51, 8 53 ( Tex .App. –Co rp us Chr is ti 2004, no p et.) ; Ex parte Llast , N o. 05 -0 3- 000991- CR , 200 4 W L 10040 4, * 1 ( Tex .App. –Da lla s, Jan. 22 2 004, no pet .) ; Ex par te Tar ango, 116 S.W .3d 201 , 202 (Tex.App .–E l Paso 20 03, no pe t.). Fo llow ing the plain lan g uag e of Rul e 25. 2, we find cer ti ficat ion i s req uired as w ell of appel lan t’ s r ig ht t o appea l deni al of his peti ti ons under C ode of C ri minal Procedu re ar ti cl e 11. 072. 2 Con seq uentl y , we abat e the se appeal s a nd remand the causes to the t ri al cour t for further proceed ing s. On re mand, t he tri al cour t s hal l uti li z e w hatev er

means nec ess ar

y to sec ure, for

eac h caus e, a Cer

ti ficat ion of Defendant ’s R ig ht of Appe al in compl ian ce w it h T exas Rule of

Appe llate Procedu re 25. 2(d), regarding app ellant ’s app eal of the trial court’s den ia l o f

hi s req uest s for

habeas co rp us. O nce ex ecut ed, t he c erti ficat ion s s hal l be3

include d in a sup plem ent al clerk’s record and f il e d w ith this Court on or before Feb ruary 25, 2 008. It is so ordered.

Per C ur iam

Do not p ubl is h.