alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Forwarded by Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/06/2010 09:19 PM

From: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Walton.Tom@epamail.epa.gov

, Susan

Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA |

Date: 07/30/2010 12:26 PM

Subject: |Emailing: idle pc cement 6_25_10 model run.xls

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243

‐ 02

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

919

‐ 541

‐ 5605

barnett.keith@epa.gov

(See attached file: idle pc cement 6_25_10 model run.xls)BrazilsVotorantimCimentosandKilnIDSTmarketplantkilnParentCompanyCityCountyStateYearBuiltCA101CALosAngeles11California Portland Cement CompanyColton San BernardinoCountyCACA1011962 Dry4,555,609CA102CALosAngeles12 1California Portland Cement CompanyColton San BernardinoCountyCACA1021962 Dry4,555,609FL301FLFlorida31 2FL501FLFlorida11 3Suwannee CementBranford Suwanee CountyFLFL5012003 Dry with pre3,748,749MD101MDBaltimorePhiladelphia3 1MD102MDBaltimorePhiladelphia32 4MI201MIDetroit31Holcim (US) Inc.Dundee Monroe CountyMIMI2011959 Wet4,397,656MI202MIDetroit32 5Holcim (US) Inc.Dundee Monroe CountyMIMI2021959 Wet4,397,656OK101OKKansasCity6 1OK102OKKansasCity6 2OK103OKKansasCity63 6PA101PAPittsburgh21Armstrong CementCabot ButlerCountyPAPA1011926 Wet1,086,511PA102PAPittsburgh22 7Armstrong CementCabot ButlerCountyPAPA1021926 Wet1,086,511SC201SCAtlanta61 8TN201TNAtlanta81 9CEMEXKnoxville Knox CountyTNTN2011978 Dry with pre3,358,826TX1001TXSanAntonio31 10TX301TXSanAntonio71Buzzi Unicem USA Inc.Maryneal NolanCountyTXTX3011971 Dry with pre1,189,447TX302TXSanAntonio72Buzzi Unicem USA Inc.Maryneal NolanCountyTXTX3021971 Dry with pre1,189,447TX303TXSanAntonio73 11Buzzi Unicem USA Inc.Maryneal NolanCountyTXTX3031971 Dry with pre1,189,447TX701TXDallas5 1TX702TXDallas52 12MarketIdleRiskNumber12updated7‐28‐10CementCapacity(103metrictons)Total8,969Averageperplant747updated7‐28‐10ComplianceCostsNOTES:ThetwoHolcimkilnshavealreadyclosedforreasonsunrelatedtothisrulemakingTotal($1,000)$70,369ArmstronsCementisasmallbusinessbutwewehavenotupdatedtheimpactsasedonthefactthattheyarenotamajorsource,sotheircostswillbereducedbymorethan50percentAverage($/metricto$7.85Idon'tunderstandSuwanneebeingonthislistbecauseitisaverynewfacilityTheyarejointlyownerbyBrazil'sVotorantimCimentosandAndersonColumbiaConstructionCementAssociation.AjointventurebetweenBrazil'sVotorantimCimentosandAndersonColumbiaConstruction,CementAssociation.AjointventurebetweenBrazil'sVotorantimCimentosandAndersonColumbiaConstruction,CapacityUtilization(%)Baseline98.4%WithRegulation54.8%ChangeinOperatingP‐$135ChangeinEmployees‐575
No. 11-100.

#### Osterbur *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

PFF Bancorp, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-138201, 333-120113, 333-65816 and 333-20337) on Forms S-8 of PFF Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated June 18, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of PFF Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofMarch 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings (loss), comprehensive earnings (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2008, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2008, which reports appear in the March 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of PFF Bancorp, Inc. 

Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has experienced a significant net loss in 2008, which has resulted in a reduction in the Company’s available liquidity and regulatorycapital. The Company would be unable to pay its outstanding debt obligations as they become due if the proposed acquisition is not consummated or another significant capital raising transaction does not occur, which raises substantial doubt aboutits ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to changes in 2006 in PFF Bancorp Inc.’s method of accounting for share-basedcompensation. 

KPMG LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

June 18, 2008
nvls_Ex_10-9


		
			Exhibit 10.9
		

		
			AMENDMENT to the
		

		
			EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
		

		
			between
		

		
			Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc. 
		

		
			and
		

		
			Jon Congleton (“Employee”)
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Employee entered into an employment agreement (the “Agreement”) effective as of January 1, 2015, as amended;
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to amend the Agreement to change the provisions relating to the severance payable to Employee and relating to the accelerated vesting of stock options in connection with Termination/Severance;
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			Section 5(e)(i) is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:




		
			 
		

		
			(i) the Company shall pay to Employee as severance an amount equal to eighteen (18) month’s Base Salary, in equal installments, subject to all applicable deductions and withholdings;
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			Section 5(e)(iii) is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 




		
			 
		

		
			(iii)  the Company shall cause any issued but unvested options to immediately vest in full.
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 3.
			

			
	
			
			Except as amended herein, the provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 




		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed and Employee has hereunto set his hand as of January 12, 2017.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						NIVALIS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ R. Michael Carruthers

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Name:

					
					
						R. Michael Carruthers

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Title:

					
					
						Chief Financial Officer

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Date:

					
					
						1/12/17

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						EMPLOYEE

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ Jon Congleton

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Jon Congleton
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 2.103 Federal use of non-Federal frequencies. ( a ) Federal stations may be authorized to use non-Federal frequencies in the bands above 25 MHz (except the 758-775 MHz and 788-805 MHz public safety bands) if the Commission finds that such use is necessary for coordination of Federal and non-Federal activities: Provided, however, that: ( 1 ) Federal operation on non-Federal frequencies shall conform with the conditions agreed upon by the Commission and NTIA (the more important of which are contained in paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3) and (a)(4) of this section);
( 2 ) Such operations shall be in accordance with Commission rules governing the service to which the frequencies involved are allocated;
( 3 ) Such operations shall not cause harmful interference to non-Federal stations and, should harmful interference result, that the interfering Federal operation shall immediately terminate; and
( 4 ) Federal operation has been certified as necessary by the non-Federal licensees involved and this certification has been furnished, in writing, to the Federal agency with which communication is required.
( b ) Federal stations may be authorized to use channels in the 769-775 MHz, 799-805 MHz and 4940-4990 MHz public safety bands with non-Federal entities if the Commission finds such use necessary; where: ( 1 ) The stations are used for interoperability or part of a Federal/non-Federal shared or joint-use system;
( 2 ) The Federal entity obtains the approval of the non-Federal (State/local government) licensee(s) or applicant(s) involved;
( 3 ) Federal operation is in accordance with the Commission's Rules governing operation of this band and conforms with any conditions agreed upon by the Commission and NTIA; and
( 4 ) Interoperability, shared or joint-use systems are the subject of a mutual agreement between the Federal and non-Federal entities. This section does not preclude other arrangements or agreements as permitted under part 90 of the rules. See 47 CFR 90.179 and 90.421 of this chapter.
( c ) Federal stations may be authorized by the First Responder Network Authority to use channels in the 758-769 MHz and 788-799 MHz public safety bands.
[63 FR 58650, Nov. 2, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 38638, June 30, 2003; 70 FR 46586, Aug. 10, 2005; 72 FR 48843, Aug. 24, 2007; 79 FR 596, Jan. 6, 2014]
No. 11-5206.

#### Guzman *v.*Lappin, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17059]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can 
review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of 
the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Room 940. Interested 
parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date 
this notice appears in the Federal Register.
    Agreement No.: 011715.
    Title: IMC/Colombia Express Space Charter and Sailing Agreement.
    Parties: Industrial Maritime Carriers (U.S.A.) Inc. Colombia 
Express, L.L.C.
    Synopsis: The proposed Agreement would permit the parties to 
charter space to one another and to coordinate their vessel services in 
the trade between United States Gulf ports, and inland U.S. points via 
such ports, and ports in Colombia and inland points via such ports.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: June 30, 2000.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-17059 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 2.949 Recognition of laboratory accreditation bodies. ( a ) A party wishing to become a laboratory accreditation body recognized by OET must submit a written request to the Chief of OET requesting such recognition. OET will make a determination based on the information provided in support of the request for recognition.
( b ) Applicants shall provide the following information as evidence of their credentials and qualifications to perform accreditation of laboratories that test equipment to Commission requirements, consistent with the requirements of § 2.948(e). OET may request additional information, or showings, as needed, to determine the applicant's credentials and qualifications. ( 1 ) Successful completion of an ISO/IEC 17011 (incorporated by reference, see § 2.910) peer review, such as being a signatory to an accreditation agreement that is acceptable to the Commission.
( 2 ) Experience with the accreditation of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), radio and telecommunications testing laboratories to ISO/IEC 17025 (incorporated by reference, see § 2.910).
( 3 ) Accreditation personnel/assessors with specific technical experience on the Commission equipment authorization rules and requirements.
( 4 ) Procedures and policies developed for the accreditation of testing laboratories for FCC equipment authorization programs.
[80 FR 33443, June 12, 2015]
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory

This page last updated on February 03, 2016 

The mobile source emissions inventory is ARB's tool for assessing the population, activity, and 

emissions from mobile sources. These inventories are constantly being revised and updated to 

support the latest air quality plans and regulations. Periodically these inventories are compiled and 

released to the public for use in transportation and air quality assessments both internal and external 

to the agency. Mobile source inventories are developed by the Mobile Source Analysis Branch in the 

Air Quality Planning and Science Division.

Announcements

EMFAC2014 officially approved by USEPA - 12/14/2015 

EMFAC2014 online training webinar slides and videos now available - 06/26/2015 

The EMFAC2014 Web Database is now available - 05/15/2015 

Mobile Source Categories

Individual category-specific emissions estimates and documentation are developed for specific 

agency regulatory activities. Categories include cars/light truck assessments for emissions standard 

development, heavy duty truck and in-use off-road emissions estimates for in-use diesel Rules, and 

category specific emissions estimates for ocean-going vessels, pleasure craft, and many other types 

of vehicles.

On-Road Motor Vehicles

Off-Road Motor Vehicles

Resources

Join our MSEI mailing list

For more information on Mobile Source Emissions Inventories, please email us at 

msei@arb.ca.gov.

Mobile Source Emission Inventory Page 1 of 1

https://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/msei.htm 10/14/2016
No. 11-5109.

#### Moore *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 25.214 Technical requirements for space stations in the Satellite Digital Audio Radio Service and associated terrestrial repeaters. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Each system authorized under this section will be conditioned upon construction, launch and operation milestones as outlined in § 25.144(b). The failure to meet any of the milestones contained in an authorization will result in its cancellation, unless such failure is due to circumstances beyond the licensee's control or unless otherwise determined by the Commission upon proper showing by the licensee in any particular case.
( c ) Frequency assignments will be made for each satellite DARS system as follows: ( 1 ) Exclusive SDARS licenses are limited to the 2320-2345 MHz segment of the 2310-2360 MHz allocated bandwidth for SDARS;
( 2 ) Two, 12.5 MHz frequency assignments are available for satellite DARS: 2320.0-2332.5 MHz and 2332.5-2345.0 MHz;
( 3 ) Satellite DARS licensees may reduce their assigned bandwidth occupancy to provide telemetry beacons in their exclusive frequency assignments;
( 4 ) Each licensee may employ cross polarization within its exclusive frequency assignment and/or may employ cross polarized transmissions in frequency assignments of other satellite DARS licensees under mutual agreement with those licensees. Licensees who come to mutual agreement to use cross-polarized transmissions shall apply to the Commission for approval of the agreement before coordination is initiated with other administrations by the licensee of the exclusive frequency assignment; and
( 5 ) Feeder uplink networks are permitted in the following Fixed-Satellite Service frequency bands: 7025-7075 MHz and 6725-7025 MHz (101° W.L. orbital location only).
( d ) *Power limit for SDARS terrestrial repeaters.* ( 1 ) SDARS terrestrial repeaters must be operated at a power level less than or equal to 12-kW average EIRP, with a maximum peak-to-average power ratio of 13 dB.
( 2 ) SDARS repeaters are permitted to operate at power levels above 12-kW average EIRP, unless a potentially affected WCS licensee provides written notice that it intends to commence commercial service within the following 365 days. Starting 180 days after receipt of such written notice, SDARS repeaters within the area notified by the potentially affected WCS licensee must be operated at a power level less than or equal to 12-kW average EIRP, with a maximum peak-to-average power ratio of 13 dB.
( 3 ) For the purpose of this section, a WCS licensee is potentially affected if it is authorized to operate a base station in the 2305-2315 MHz or 2350-2360 MHz bands within 25 kilometers of a repeater seeking to operate with a power level greater than that prescribed in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
[62 FR 11106, Mar. 11, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 45068, Aug. 2, 2010; 78 FR 8429, Feb. 6, 2013; 78 FR 9619, Feb. 11, 2013; 79 FR 8323, Feb. 12, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-277-001]


Canyon Creek Compression Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 29, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 19, 2000, Canyon Creek Compression Company 
(Canyon Creek) filed to comply with the Director letter order issued on 
June 6, 2000, in Docket No. RP00-277-000, which required Canyon Creek 
to provide a corrected electronic version of Third Revised Sheet No. 
137 to FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1. Canyon Creek 
previously submitted an updated Third Revised Sheet No. 137 in hard 
copy form but inadvertently did not update the electronic copy of Third 
Revised Sheet No. 137.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-17000 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Jayme Dorrough, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Techlabs, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Techlabs, Inc.

August 19, 2004

                                        By: /s/ Jayme Dorrough
                                        Jayme Dorrough,
                                        President
#### § 201.0 Background.

National policy with respect to the conservation, allocation and use of the Nation's telecommunications resources during crises and emergencies is set forth in Executive Order 12472. The following parts of this chapter address specific responsibilities with respect to management of telecommunications resources and related procedures which bear upon provision, restoration and continuity of telecommunications services during crises and emergencies. In doing so, the chapter encompasses both national security and emergency preparedness activities, consistent with Executive Order 12472. This concept of national security and emergency preparedness telecommunications services (as defined in § 201.2(g)) includes crises that do not necessarily entail serious degradation of, or serious threats to, national security. It therefore is a broader concept than the term “national security emergency preparedness activities” in Executive Order 12656, which concerns only national security emergencies, and preparedness activities necessarily related to such emergencies.
#### § 214.0 Authority.

The provisions of this part 214 are issued pursuant to Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1977, 42 FR 56101, 91 Stat. 1633, as amended (5 U.S.C. appendix) and Executive Order 12472. This part 214 replaces Annex 1 of DMO 3000.1, dated November 8, 1963, 28 FR 12273.
§ 50-204.5 Machine guarding. ( a ) One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, in going nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are—Barrier guards, two hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.
( b ) General requirements for machine guards. Guards shall be affixed to the machine where possible and secured elsewhere if for any reason attachment to the machine is not possible. The guard shall be such that it does not offer an accident hazard in itself.
( c ) Point of Operation Guarding. ( 1 ) Point of operation is the area on a machine where work is actually performed upon the material being processed.
( 2 ) Where existing standards prepared by organizations listed in § 50-204.2 provide for point of operation guarding such standards shall prevail. Other types of machines for which there are no specific standards, and the operation exposes an employee to injury, the point of operation shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be so designed and constructed so as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.
( 3 ) Special hand tools for placing and removing material shall be such as to permit easy handling of material without the operator placing a hand in the danger zone. Such tools shall not be in lieu of other guarding required by this section, but can only be used to supplement protection provided.
( 4 ) The following are some of the machines which usually require point of operation guarding: Guillotine cutters. Shears. Alligator shears. Power presses. Milling machines. Power saws. Jointers. Portable power tools. Forming rolls and calenders.
( d ) Revolving drums, barrels and containers shall be guarded by an enclosure which is interlocked with the drive mechanism, so that the barrel, drum or container cannot revolve unless the guard enclosure is in place.
( e ) When the periphery of the blades of a fan is less than seven (7) feet above the floor or working level, the blades shall be guarded. The guard shall have openings no larger than one half (1 ⁄ 2) inch.
( f ) Machines designed for a fixed location shall be securely anchored to prevent walking or moving.