alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
546 S.E.2d 755

#### Christopher BRUHN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 0818-00-2.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

May 29, 2001.

Before: FITZPATRICK, C.J., and BENTON, WILLIS, ELDER, BRAY ANNUNZIATA, BUMGARDNER, FRANK, HUMPHREYS, CLEMENTS and AGEE, JJ.

UPON A PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

On May 8, 2001 came the appellee, by the Attorney General of Virginia, and filed a petition praying that the Court set aside the judgment rendered herein on April 24, 2001, and grant a rehearing en banc thereof.

On consideration whereof, the petition for rehearing en banc is granted, the mandate entered herein on April 24, 2001 is stayed pending the decision of the Court en banc, and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35. The appellee shall attach as an addendum to the opening brief upon rehearing en banc a copy of the opinion previously rendered by the Court in this matter. It is further ordered that the appellee shall file with the clerk of this Court twelve additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
%
wy «
t ve
ge UNITED STATES STATE OF CALIFORNIA CAMPO QUADRANGLE J

ht

CALIFORNIA—SAN DIEGO CO. ae

Vor
S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR EDMUND G. BROWN, GOVERNOR 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) e
& GEOLOGICAL SURVEY HARVEY O. BANKS, DIRECTOR OF WATER RESOURCES SW/4 CAMPO 15° QUADRANGLE Ye
® 36°30" ; |S liens 02 mi once ar L9socoa FEET) ——_-116°22%30"
32°37'30" Tae Vd ee 32°37'30
Seal Dy A \
aN é
cs
oh
-3699000".N, ‘ aN ra
T. 18 S.
T. 18 S.
“es 3608
=
8 160 000
4 FEET
iE /
2
g
8
g
a
Ss
ay
ge
og 3607
2k
Big
~\
3606
' +35
354+
3604 =
a)
3603 3
$ u
ok <0
aS) ee
g z
3602 302
3601 Fy
32/30" + + + ~, 32'30"
3600 Ey
3399 ay
130 000 |
FEET
3598 ing
3397 on
3596 3596000".N,
°30' . - { 1 1375 T 32°30"
oR Cees 154g |s49 1930000 FEET 1550 27°30" 551 Ts5qt 35 Tas 25° 1856 [@ INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WAEHINGTON, 5, C= sogotom Ao
116°30'
Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey + : SCALE 1:24000 fetta
MILE
Control by USGS, USC&GS, and USCE Ley z = = C LASSIFICATION
Topography from aerial photographs by photogrammetric methods SN Al co Q Mc) _ ge) —_eo) | __e) —__) —__) _eer Medium-duty Light-duty ——

i Soest
Aerial photographs taken 1954 and 1956. Field check 1959 |

1 5 0 1 KILOMETER Unimproved dirt ---------
fas es SP eee
Polyconic projection. 1927 North American datum ovie’ || 7249 mits .
< 7 Fi
10,000-foot grid based on California coordinate system, zone 6 CTI AMT SI ERAT CoAIT eye USGS NMD HISTORICAL MAP © Siate Route
1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks, i)

zone 11, shown in blue )

Unchecked elevations are shown in brown UTM GRID AND 1959 MAGNETIC NORTH SEP 1 1 1985 CAMPO, CALIF.

W/4 CAMPO 1 Al
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET QUADRANGLE LSCATION| SW/4 CAMPO 15’ QUADRANGLE

THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS N3230—W11622.5/7.5
FOR SALE BY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, DENVER, COLORADO 80225, OR RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092 D FILE eOPY
‘A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST R 1959
. ST AMS 2749 Ill SW—SERIES V895
Exhibit






Amendment 2010-1 to the
Barnes Group Inc. Stock and Incentive Award Plan


Section 2(p) of the Barnes Group Inc. Stock and Incentive Award Plan, as amended March 15, 2010, is hereby restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“(p) ‘Fair Market Value’ on a particular date means as follows:
(i)If the principal market for the Common Stock is a national securities exchange, the last reported sale price per share of Common Stock during regular trading hours on such date as reported by Reuters or another source designated by the Committee; or
(ii)If the principal market for the Common Stock is not a national securities exchange, the last reported sale price per share of Common Stock during regular trading hours on such date in the over-the-counter market, as reported by the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, the National Quotation Bureau or such other system then providing quotations with regard to trades in the Common Stock or, if on such date the Common Stock is publicly traded but not quoted by any such system, the last reported sale price per share of Common Stock during regular trading hours such date as furnished by a professional market maker making a market in the Common Stock; or
(iii)If in (i) or (ii) above, as applicable, there were no sales on such date reported as provided above, the last reported sale price per share of Common Stock during regular trading hours on the most recent prior day for which sales were so reported.
If the foregoing method of determining fair market value should be inconsistent with Section 409A, Section 422, Section 162(m)(4)(C) or any other provision of the Code, then, with respect to Awards (including in particular but not limited to Incentive Stock Options) and transactions that are intended by the Committee to satisfy Section 409A, Section 422, Section 162(m)(4)(C) or any other provision of the Code, ‘Fair Market Value’ shall be determined by the Committee in a manner consistent with Section 409A, Section 422, Section 162(m)(4)(C) or such other provision of the Code and shall mean the value as so determined.”


Date of Approval by the Board of Directors: December 9, 2010
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00668- CV
Rafael Montez da Oca, Appellant

v. Edu ardo Gutie rre z, Appellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 2 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY NO. C-1 -CV- 12- 0007 82, H ONO RAB LE ERIC SH EP P ERD, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
P ER CURIAM

This Court has been notified that appellant Rafae l Montez da Oca has filed for bankruptc y protec tion (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas, case number 15-10587). Acc ording ly , the appea l is stay ed. See 11 U.S.C. § 362 ; T ex . R. App. P. 8. Any party may file a motion to reinstate upon the occur renc e of an event that would allow the appea l to proce ed. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. Fa ilure to notify this Court of a lift of the automatic stay or the conclusion of the bankruptc y proce eding will result in the dismiss al of the case for want of prosec ution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and B ourland Ba nkruptcy Filed: May

19, 2015
# Vacancy: Research Analyst

/ Published Oct. 16, 2017

## LEARN MORE CLICK HERE 

### Summary

The incumbent of this position will serve as Research Analyst (Project Manager) in the Office of the Dean of Faculty and Academic Programs at the College of Information and Cyberspace (CIC).The CIC serves as the Department of Defense's (DoD's) principal educational resource for the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and their senior staffs and the Joint Staff for education in the cyber domain. As such, the CIC is responsible for a number of programs associated with Information Technology and Cyberspace education.The National Defense University develops joint warfighters and other national security leaders through rigorous academics, research and engagement to serve the common defense.**This is a Title 10 Excepted Service Appointment. Appointment is not to exceed 3 years with the possibility for extension.**
Learn more about this agency

### Responsibilities

Serves an advisor to the Dean of Faculty and Academic Programs, with responsibility for managing, directing, and advancing academic programs and faculty development activities.- Collaborates with CIC leadership, faculty and staff to keep the CIC Faculty Handbook current and relevant.-Works closely with CIC leadership and other NDU components to develop programs and policies that link faculty enhancement with the larger College initiatives. -Supports workshops, conferences, informal discussion groups, speaker series, technological applications, new faculty orientation, faculty mentorship, and program review and reflection.-Provides support for travel, course schedule, faculty hours and CIC web page.-Serves leadership in researching data needed for their scholarship.

### Travel Required

Occasional travel - You may be expected to travel for this position.

##### Supervisory status

No

##### Promotion Potential

1

### Who May Apply

#### This job is open to...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0181 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ERNEST LEROY REYNOLDS, III,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 6, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 28 2022

11/28/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0181
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.430 Proceedings on a notice of inquiry.

The provisions of this subpart also govern proceedings commenced by issuing a “Notice of Inquiry,” except that such proceedings do not result in the adoption of rules, and Notices of Inquiry are not required to be published in the Federal Register.

[51 FR 7445, Mar. 4, 1986]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Brian J. Martin,
President (chief executive officer) of the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the Managing Owner), of Prudential Securities Strategic Trust (the Trust), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 996 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                         |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 
|/s/ BRIAN J. MARTIN                                                      |  |  |  | 
|                                                                         |  |  |  | 
|President (chief executive officer) of the Managing Owner March 29, 2004 |  |
#### § 26.202 [Reserved]
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00525

- CV
Juan Antonio Coronado, Francisco Soliz Ramirez, Roberto Rivera III, and Ruben Contreras v. Freedom Communications, Inc. d/b/a The Brownsville Herald and Valley Morning Star
On Appeal from the 357th Dis trict Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2008

- 03

- 1636

- E

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 30, 2015
FILED

Gnited States Court of Appeals
for the federal Circuit

IN RE COMPLAINT NOS. FC-21-90003, FC-21-90004,
AND FC-21-90005

Before PRosT, Chief Judge.
ORDER AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM

The complainant has filed judicial misconduct com-
plaints concerning three judges of this court who served
on a merits panel that decided his appeal.

The complainant disagrees with the decision made in
his case, alleging that the judges “failed to uphold federal
law” and “obstruct[ed] justice by failing to order a grand
jury investigation.” These claims relate directly to the
merits of the judges’ rulings and must therefore be dis-
missed. See Rule 11(c)(1)(B) of the Rules for Judicial-
Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings.

The complainant also contends that “the court has
failed to grant a prompt hearing” in relation to the “writ
of habeas corpus” he submitted in his prior appeal and
further contends that “[t]he panel is protecting a govern-
mental criminal enterprise by hiding [t]he criminal enter-
prise behind boilerplate language and using lack of
jurisdiction as an affirmative defense keeping me a victim
of the governmental racketeering enterprise.”

To the extent that these claims relate directly to the
panel's construction of that post-judgment submission as
part of a petition for rehearing and to the panel’s subse-
quent denial of that request, again, those claims must be

U.S, COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

rEB 19 2021
PETER R. MARKSTEINER

CLERK


to

IN RE COMPLAINT NOS. FC-21-90003, -90004, -90005

dismissed. To the extent that the complainant is chal-
lenging any delay in deciding that submission,
“[clognizable misconduct does not include an allegation
about delay in rendering a decision or ruling, unless the
allegation concerns an improper motive in delaying a
particular decision or habitual delay in a significant
number of unrelated cases.” Rule 4(b)(2). And here, the
allegations clearly lack sufficient evidence to raise an
inference that such misconduct has occurred. Rule

11@©()@).
Accordingly,
Ir Is ORDERED THAT:

The complaints are dismissed.

February 19, 2021 /s/ Sharon Prost
Date Sharon Prost
Chief Judge

There is a right to file a petition for review of this or-
der. Pursuant to Rule 18(b) of the Rules for Judicial-
Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings, any petition
for review must be received by the circuit executive within
42 days of the date of this order. Any petition must be
sent to:

Circuit Executive
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
717 Madison Place, NW
Washington, DC 20439
§ 26.101 Eligibility. The following entities are eligible for Space Launch Services licenses: ( a ) A non-Federal entity that conducts space launch operations; or
( b ) A parent of such entity or a subsidiary of such entity if either conducts space launch operations.
**                                                                                                     Exhibit 23**

 

Consent of Independent  Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

PFF Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in  the registration statements (No. 333-20337 and No. 333-65816) on Form S-8 of  PFF Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated June 9, 2004, with respect to the  consolidated balance sheets of PFF Bancorp, Inc. as of March 31, 2004 and  2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive  earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the years in the  three-year period ended March 31, 2004, which report appears in the March 31,  2004, annual report on Form 10-K of PFF Bancorp, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California

June 14, 2004
3308 Oak Grove Avenue ◊ Dallas, Texas 75204 ◊ (214) 741 -6260 ◊ Fax (214) 741-6248 www.johnstontobey.com October 13, 2015

By Efiling
Abel Acosta Clerk, Court of Criminal Appeals Post Office Box 12308, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711

RE: State v. Albert G. Hill III

PD -0019 -15; PD-0020 -15; PD -0021 -15; PD-0022 -15

Dear Mr. Acosta:

I will appear to argue for the State of Texas on November 4, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.

Respectfully,

/s/Charles “ Chad ” Baruch

copies: Michael Mowla (michael@mowlalaw.com) Robert Udashen (rnu@sualaw.com) PD-0019-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 10/13/2015 11:24:40 AM Accepted 10/13/2015 11:31:43 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
No. 11-9839.

#### Bush *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### §§ 27.202-27.208 [Reserved]
#### § 22.711 Provision of information to applicants.

Licensees in the Rural Radio Service must, upon request by a *bona-fide* prospective applicant, provide to such applicant the information required by § 22.709 regarding the portion of the licensee's operations that potentially could affect, or be affected by, the prospective applicant's proposed station, if such information is not already on file with the FCC. This information must be provided to the *bona-fide* prospective applicant no later than 30 days after receipt of the information request.

[59 FR 59954, Nov. 21, 1994]
#### § 22.725 Channels for conventional rural radiotelephone stations and basic exchange telephone radio systems.

The following channels are allocated for paired assignment to transmitters that provide conventional rural radiotelephone service and to transmitters in basic exchange telephone radio systems. These channels may be assigned for use by central office or rural subscriber stations as indicated, and interoffice stations. These channels may be assigned also for use by relay stations in systems where it would be impractical to provide rural radiotelephone service without the use of relay stations. All channels have a bandwidth of 20 kHz and are designated by their center frequencies in MegaHertz.

| Central office | Rural subscriber | Central office | Rural subscriber |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **VHF Channels** | | | |
| 152.03 | 158.49 | 152.57 | 157.83 |
| 152.06 | 158.52 | 152.60 | 157.86 |
| 152.09 | 158.55 | 152.63 | 157.89 |
| 152.12 | 158.58 | 152.66 | 157.92 |
| 152.15 | 158.61 | 152.69 | 157.95 |
| 152.18 | 158.64 | 152.72 | 157.98 |
| 152.21 | 158.67 | 152.75 | 158.01 |
| 152.51 | 157.77 | 152.78 | 158.04 |
| 152.54 | 157.80 | 152.81 | 158.07 |
| UHF Channels | | | |
| 454.025 | 459.025 | 454.350 | 459.350 |
| 454.050 | 459.050 | 454.375 | 459.375 |
| 454.075 | 459.075 | 454.400 | 459.400 |
| 454.100 | 459.100 | 454.425 | 459.425 |
| 454.125 | 459.125 | 454.450 | 459.450 |
| 454.150 | 459.150 | 454.475 | 459.475 |
| 454.175 | 459.175 | 454.500 | 459.500 |
| 454.200 | 459.200 | 454.525 | 459.525 |
| 454.225 | 459.225 | 454.550 | 459.550 |
| 454.250 | 459.250 | 454.575 | 459.575 |
| 454.275 | 459.275 | 454.600 | 459.600 |
| 454.300 | 459.300 | 454.625 | 459.625 |
| 454.325 | 459.325 | 454.650 | 459.650 |

(a) The channels listed in this section are also allocated for assignment in the Paging and Radiotelephone Service.

(b) In Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, channels in the 154.04-154.46 MHz and 161.40-161.85 MHz frequency ranges may be assigned to transmitters providing rural radiotelephone service; channels in these ranges are also allocated for assignment in the International Fixed Public and Aeronautical Fixed radio services.

[[59 FR 59507](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/59-FR-59507), Nov. 17, 1994; [60 FR 9891](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/60-FR-9891), Feb. 22, 1995, as amended at [70 FR 19309](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-19309), Apr. 13, 2005]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Danah D. DIGGS, Defendant—Appellant.

Nos. 04-6193, 04-6259.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 2004.

Decided March 19, 2004.

Danah D. Diggs, Appellant pro se. Robert Lucas Hobbs, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia; Eric Matthew Hurt, Office of the United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Danah D. Diggs appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion for a downward departure and motion to correct sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See United States v. Diggs,*No. CR-01-02 (W.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2003; Jan. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Prepared By

Firm Name

Address

OMB Control No.2060-0347

STATEMENT OF ENERGY DESIGN INTENT

September 5, 2007

FACILITY INFORMATION D

Facility Name and Location

School

Dallas, TX - United States 75202 Building

Owner/Company

Facility Characteristics Address

K-12 School 90,000 Sq. Ft.

Total Gross Floor Area 90,000 Sq. Ft. Contact Name

Phone

Design Energy (kBtu)1 Email

Electricity 2,217,800

Natural Gas 600,000

DESIGN ENERGY PERFOD̀

Energy DESIGN ENERGY STAR

EPA Energy Performance Rating (1 – 100) 88 75

Percent Energy Reduction (%)2 36 20

Site Energy Use Intensity (kBtu/sf/yr) 31.3 39.4

Total Annual Site Energy (kBtu) 2,817,800 3,543,974

Total Annual Energy Cost ($) $ 49,156 $ 61,824

Pollution Emissions (1000 lbs/yr)

CO2 846 1,060

PROFESSIONAL VERIFICATION D 

Licensed Architect/Engineer Professional Stamp

Signature & Date

Phone

Email

Architect of Record (if different from above)

Name

Firm Name

Phone

Email

The facility was designed and specified to meet the Design 

Energy performance calculations shown on this Statement of 

Energy Design Intent.

1 Target Finder uses data fro 

equipm

2 Percent energy reduced is̀

This
Floor

Area

of of PCs

Students

Hours/Week Facility Air-Conditioned Heated

90000

Sq. Ft. 600 100 70 Hours Yes 100 100 10 Yes

STATEMENT OF ENERGY DESIGN INTENT

September 5, 2007

Facility Name and Location

School

Dallas, TX - United States 75202

Facility Characteristics (Detail) 

K-12

School

Gross Number Number Operating Cooking % % Months Ventilated

Additional

This document was generated from Target Finder, an EPA tool located on the ENERGY STAR Web site, www.energystar.gov.

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3.75 hours per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information,

the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques

to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control 

number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.

EPA Form 5900-22 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Ecuity,  Inc., a Nevada  corporation
(the  "Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Leon M. Caldwell,
Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,, that to the best
of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ LEON M. CALDWELL
-------------------------
Leon M. Caldwell
Secretary/Treasurer
May 18, 2005

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       33