alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 32.1280 Prepayments. This account shall include: ( a ) The amounts of rents paid in advance of the period in which they are chargeable to income, except amounts chargeable to telecommunications plant under construction and minor amounts which may be charged directly to the final accounts. As the term expires for which the rents are paid, this account shall be credited monthly and the appropriate account charged.
( b ) The balance of all taxes, other than amounts chargeable to telecommunication plant under construction and minor amounts which may be charged to the final accounts, paid in advance and which are chargeable to income within one year. As the term expires for which the taxes are paid, this account shall be credited monthly and the appropriate account charged.
( c ) The amount of insurance premiums paid in advance of the period in which they are chargeable to income, except premiums chargeable to telecommunications plant under construction and minor amounts which may be charged directly to the final accounts. As the term expires for which the premiums are paid, this account shall be credited monthly and the appropriate account charged.
( d ) The cost of preparing, printing, binding, and delivering directories and the cost of soliciting advertisements for directories, except minor amounts which may be charged directly to Account 6622, Number services. These prepaid directory expenses shall be cleared to Account 6622 by monthly charges representing that portion of the expenses applicable to each month.
( e ) Other prepayments not included in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section except for minor amounts which may be charged directly to the final accounts. As the term expires for which the payments apply, this account shall be credited monthly and the appropriate account charged.
[67 FR 5682, Feb. 6, 2002, as amended at 69 FR 53648, Sept. 2, 2004]
#### § 25.152 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16950]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-588-703]


Internal Combustion Forklift Trucks From Japan; Corrected Final 
Results of Expedited Sunset Review and Continuation of Antidumping 
Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Correction to Final Results of Expedited Sunset 
Review and Continuation of Antidumping Order: Internal Combustion 
Forklift Trucks from Japan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 5, 1999, the Department of Commerce (the 
``Department'') published in the Federal Register the final results of 
the expedited sunset review of the antidumping duty order on internal 
combustion forklift trucks from Japan (64 FR 30962). On June 2, 2000, 
the Department published the notice of continuation of this order (65 
FR 35323). Subsequent to the publication of these notices, we 
identified an inadvertent error in the ``Scope'' section of the 
notices. Therefore, we are correcting and clarifying these inadvertent 
errors.
    The error lies in the first sentence of the scope section of each 
notice: ``The merchandise subject to this antidumping duty order is 
internal combustion industrial forklift trucks, with a lifting capacity 
of 2,000 to 5,000 pounds, from Japan.'' This sentence should be 
replaced with: ``The merchandise subject to this antidumping duty order 
is internal combustion industrial forklift trucks, with a lifting 
capacity of 2,000 to 15,000 pounds, from Japan.''

Effective Date: April 17, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn B. McCormick or James Maeder, 
Office of Policy for Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230: telephone (202) 482-1930 and (202) 
482-3330, respectively.
    This correction is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(h) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: June 27, 2000.
Troy H. Cribb,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-16950 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2020-1307: cxLoyalty, Inc. v. Maritz Holdings Inc. - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9OLlNihbI7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-09-2020-2020-1307-cxloyalty-inc-v-maritz-holdings-inc-audio-uploaded\/\">2020-1307: cxLoyalty, Inc. v. Maritz Holdings Inc.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-09-2020-2020-1307-cxloyalty-inc-v-maritz-holdings-inc-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=9OLlNihbI7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2020-1307: cxLoyalty, Inc. v. Maritz Holdings Inc.” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"9OLlNihbI7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: cxLoyalty, Inc. v. Maritz Holdings Inc. (mp3) Appeal Number: 2020-1307 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.316 [Reserved]
§ 302-17.54 How does my agency calculate my RITA under the one-year process? ( a ) Your agency provides allowances to you, reimburses you for vouchers that you submit, and pays certain relocation vendors directly, all during the calendar year as described in subpart B of this part. Some of these reimbursements, allowances, and direct payments to vendors are taxable income to you, the employee, as described in subpart A of this part. Your agency computes a WTA and reports the WTA to the IRS as taxes withheld for you for each of these taxable reimbursements, allowances, and direct payments to vendors. The WTA may be optional to you. However, if your agency is using a one-year RITA process, there is no advantage to you in choosing not to receive the WTA, because your agency will adjust the WTA payment to the IRS. See § 302-17.55(a)(1).
( b ) Your agency establishes a cutoff date (for example, December 1), after which it will not issue reimbursements or allowances to you or make direct payments to relocation vendors for the rest of the calendar year.
( c ) If the information on your “Statement of Income and Tax Filing Status” changes after you have submitted the initial version, you must submit an amended “Statement of Income and Tax Filing Status” no later than your agency's cutoff date.
( d ) During the period between the cutoff date and the end of the calendar year, your agency calculates your RITA.
( e ) Your RITA is itself taxable income to you. To account for taxes on the RITA, your agency will gross-up your RITA by using a gross-up formula that multiplies the grossed-up CMTR by the total of all covered taxable relocation benefits, and then subtracts your grossed-up WTA from that total. That is:
Where C = CMTR R = Reimbursements, allowances, and direct payments to vendors covered by WTA Y = Total grossed-up WTA paid during the current year.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.77 Detailed application procedures; cross references. The application procedures set forth in §§ 1.61 through 1.68 are general in nature. Applicants should also refer to the Commission rules regarding the payment of statutory charges (subpart G of this part) and the use of the FCC Registration Number (FRN) (see subpart W of this part). More detailed procedures are set forth in this chapter as follows: ( a ) Rules governing applications for authorizations in the Broadcast Radio Services are set forth in subpart D of this part.
( b ) Rules governing applications for authorizations in the Common Carrier Radio Services are set forth in subpart E of this part.
( c ) Rules governing applications for authorizations in the Private Radio Services are set forth in subpart F of this part.
( d ) Rules governing applications for authorizations in the Experimental Radio Service are set forth in part 5 of this chapter.
( e ) Rules governing applications for authorizations in the Domestic Public Radio Services are set forth in part 21 of this chapter.
( f ) Rules governing applications for authorizations in the Industrial, Scientific, and Medical Service are set forth in part 18 of this chapter.
( g ) Rules governing applications for certification of equipment are set forth in part 2, subpart J, of this chapter.
( h ) Rules governing applications for commercial radio operator licenses are set forth in part 13 of this chapter.
( i ) Rules governing applications for authorizations in the Common Carrier and Private Radio terrestrial microwave services and Local Multipoint Distribution Services are set out in part 101 of this chapter.
[28 FR 12415, Nov. 22, 1963, as amended at 44 FR 39180, July 5, 1979; 47 FR 53378, Nov. 26, 1982; 61 FR 26670, May 28, 1996; 62 FR 23162, Apr. 29, 1997; 63 FR 36596, July 7, 1998; 66 FR 47895, Sept. 14, 2001; 78 FR 25160, Apr. 29, 2013]
Argued and submitted July 15,

reversed and remanded October 26, 1994,

petition for review denied January 24,1995 (320 Or 507)

#### Jaqualla FOXWORTH, a minor, by her Co-Guardians Ad Litem, Brian Foxworth and Janice Woods, *Appellants, v.*EMANUEL HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER, *Defendant, and*Robert K. HUSTON, M.D., and Northwest Newborn Specialists, P.C., a professional corporation, *Respondents.*

(9109-05871; CA A78884)

883 P2d 917

Timothy J. Vanagas argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Michael S. Evans, Michael C. Zusman and Grenley, Rotenberg, Laskowski, Evans & Bragg, P.C.

Janet M. Schroer argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Mary K. VanderWeele and Hoffman, Hart & Wagner.

*111Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

LEESON, J.

*112LEESON, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for physician defendants in a medical malpractice action, assigning error to the admission of evidence of a prior settlement between plaintiff and defendant hospital. We reverse.

In *Holger v. Irish,*316 Or 402, 414, 851 P2d 1122 (1993), the Supreme Court held that usually “it is not proper to inform the jury concerning a plaintiffs remedies or potential remedies against persons who are not parties in the dispute that the jury is to decide, unless that information has independent relevance.” *See also Pounds v. Holy Rosary Medical Center,*127 Or App 221, 872 P2d 437, *rev den*320 Or 109 (1994).

Defendants contend that *Holger and Pounds*are not dispositive, because neither of those cases “addressed whether settlement information is prejudicial to a jury’s consideration of liability.” (Emphasis supplied.) They argue that, although settlement information could be prejudicial on the issue of *damages,*the jury did not reach the damages issue in this case and the settlement information therefore was harmless. We disagree. In *Holger and Pounds,*as in this case, evidence of settlement was admitted at trial, the juries returned verdicts finding defendants not liable, and the juries never reached the issue of damages. The settlement information in both cases was held to be prejudicial and to lack independent relevance.

*Holger*and *Pounds*stand for the proposition that settlement information is not admissible unless it has independent relevance to the issue of damages or liability. Defendants do not argue that any of the multiple references to settlement in this case had independent relevance to the issue of liability.1

Reversed and remanded.

1

 The trial court referred to the settlement during jury selection, before the taking of evidence, and again while instructing the jury on the law. Defense counsel referred to the settlement twice during opening argument, and ended his closing argument by saying:

> “In fact, I’m going to remind you that from the evidence that you have heard, [plaintiffs counsel] had all of these large numbers in mind when he settled with [the hospital]. And I’m sure he didn’t forget that. Thank you.”
§ 27.1605 Reimbursement clearinghouse. ( a ) The clearinghouse ultimately selected shall determine the reimbursement obligations of each Licensee pursuant to § 27.1604. ( 1 ) The clearinghouse must be a must be a neutral, independent entity with no conflicts of interest (as defined in § 27.1414(b), on the part of the organization or its officers, directors, employees, contractors, or significant subcontractors.
( 2 ) The clearinghouse must be able to demonstrate that it has the requisite expertise to perform the duties required, which will include collecting and distributing reimbursement payments, auditing incoming and outgoing estimates, mitigating cost disputes among parties, and generally acting as a clearinghouse.
( 3 ) The clearinghouse must comply with, on an ongoing basis, all applicable laws and Federal Government guidance on privacy and information security requirements such as relevant provisions in the Federal Information Security Management Act, National Institute of Standards and Technology publications, and Office of Management and Budget guidance.
( 4 ) The clearinghouse must provide quarterly reports to the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau that detail the status of reimbursement funds available, the payments issued, the amounts collected from licensees, and any information filed by incumbents. The reports must account for all funds spent, including the clearinghouse's own expenses. The report shall include descriptions of any disputes and the manner in which they were resolved.
( b ) Non-Federal secondary radiolocation licensees in the 3.3-3.55 GHz band that seek reimbursement of their expenses for relocating operations authorized under their licenses and existing as of February 22, 2019, must submit invoices or other appropriate documentation of such expenses to the clearinghouse no later than a date to be specified by public notice.
( c ) Expenses must be reasonably related to the relocation from the 3.3-3.55 GHz band to the 2.9-3.0 GHz band, may be future expenses or expenses already incurred—including the clearinghouse's costs, and no expenses for other purposes will be subject to reimbursement. Ineligible expenses include, but are not limited to, those related to upgrades or improvements. The clearinghouse shall have the authority to determine whether particular expenses are eligible for reimbursement.
( d ) The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau is responsible for resolving any disputes arising from decisions by the clearinghouse and shall specify by public notice when the clearinghouse's responsibilities have terminated.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)  OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Tammy L. Cameron, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report of Depomed, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



March 12,
2008

| |  | By: |  | /s/TAMMY L. CAMERONTammy L. Cameron Interim Principal Accounting
Officer
| |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





SCB Computer Technology, Inc.
Memphis, Tennessee


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-1590, Form S-8 No. 333-36971, Form S-8 No.
333-68343 and Form S-8 No. 333-76118), of our report dated June 14, 2002,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of SCB Computer
Technology, Inc. incorporated by reference and/or appearing in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2002.








Memphis, Tennessee
July 24, 2002
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"20-1411: RAO v. SMITH [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wCrdeM7xuq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/1-12-2021-20-1411-rao-v-smith-rule-36-judgment-20-1411-rule_36_judgment-1-12-2021_1715996\/\">20-1411: RAO v. SMITH [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/1-12-2021-20-1411-rao-v-smith-rule-36-judgment-20-1411-rule_36_judgment-1-12-2021_1715996\/embed\/#?secret=wCrdeM7xuq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“20-1411: RAO v. SMITH [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"wCrdeM7xuq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: RAO v. SMITH [RULE 36 JUDGMENT](pdf) Appeal Number: 20-1411 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

AMENDMENT OF RULE 219 OF THE 

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF 

DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 163

DISCIPLINARY RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2018, upon the recommendation of the 

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; the proposal having been

published for comment in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, 48 Pa.B. 1270 (March 3, 2018):

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania 

that Rule 219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement is amended in the 

attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall 

be effective in 30 days.

Material to be added is bolded and underlined.

Material to be deleted is bolded and in brackets.