alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 60-50)

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notificaiton. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 60-50 with attached transmittal, policy justificaiton, and Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: August 1, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 44619)          ( print page 44620)          ( print page 44621)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 06-6724 Filed 8-4-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

s0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144843

JOHN L. HALFORD,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 144843

COA: 304068

Genesee CC: 11

- 095586

- NO

CITY OF FLINT,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and H AT HAWAY

, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
# Comments on: Court Operating Status for the Week of January 18, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                       112
<INVENTORY>                                      2,558
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,785
<PP&E>                                           6,129
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,969
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,606
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,005)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,295
<SALES>                                          2,879
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,879
<CGS>                                            2,346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   556
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (148)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (148)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (148)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
302A14

#### State v. Juan Carlos Rodriguez

Def’s Motion to Amend Record on Appeal

Allowed 02/22/2016
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Frank P. Reilly, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of NuState Energy Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of NuState Energy Holdings,
Inc.

                                   NuSTATE ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.

Dated: December 3, 2008            By: /s/ Frank P. Reilly
                                       -------------------
                                   Name: Frank P. Reilly
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer, Principal
                                          Executive Officer and Principal
                                          Financial and Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.57 Circulation and voting of petitions for forbearance. ( a ) If a petition for forbearance includes novel questions of fact, law or policy which cannot be resolved under outstanding precedents and decisions, the Chairperson will circulate a draft order no later than 28 days prior to the statutory deadline, unless all Commissioners agree to a shorter period.
( b ) The Commission will vote on any circulated order resolving a forbearance petition not later than seven days before the last day that action must be taken to prevent the petition from being deemed granted by operation of law.
[74 FR 39227, Aug. 6, 2009, as amended at 88 FR 21433, Apr. 10, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41649-41650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. MT00-8-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

June 29, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 26, 2000, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become 
effective August 1, 2000:

Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 3
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 360
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 361

    Natural states that on April 5, 2000, Kinder Morgan, Inc. closed on 
a transaction with ONEOK, Inc. (ONEOK) whereby various assets and 
entities were transferred to ONEOK, including all entities that were 
then marketing affiliates of Natural. As a result of the transaction, 
Natural states that it no longer has a marketing affiliate and is 
revising its Tariff accordingly.
    Natural respectfully requests waiver of any provisions of its 
Tariff and/or the Commission's Regulations required to permit the 
instant filing to become effective as proposed.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the

[[Page 41650]]

web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16993 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
AFS-12-177-E March 15, 2012

Exemption No. 9704B Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2008-0332

Mr. Ian A. Shavitz Counsel for Inter American University of Puerto Rico Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW. Washington, DC 20036

Dear Mr. Shavitz:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9704, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, lists the conditions and limitations, and includes the exemption’s expiration date.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated January 23, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Inter American University of Puer to Rico (Inter American) for an extension of Exemption No. 9704, as amended. That exemption from § 61.129(a)(4) and part 141, appendix D, paragraph 5(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Inter American’s commercial pilot students to satisfy their cross-country flight of no less than 300 nautical miles (nm) total distance, with landings at a minimum of three points, one of which is a straight-line distance of at least 150 nm from the original departure point.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Inter American.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9704, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and

limitations below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. The cross-country flight must be accomplished as a solo flight.

2. The commercial student’s logbook must be endorsed by the certificated flight instructor (CFI) as follows: “I certify that (INSERT STUDENT’S FIRST NAME, MIDDLE INITIAL, LAST NAME), (INSERT PILOT CERTIFICATE), (INSERTCERTIFICATE NUMBER), has satisfactorily completed the solo single-engine crosscountry flight in Puerto Rico in accordance with the provision of FAA Exemption No. 9704 on (INSERT DATE). S/S (INSERT DATE) (INSERT CFI NAME), (INSERT CFI CERTIFICATE NUMBER), EXPIRATION DATE (INSERT DATE).

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 9704, as amended to May 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards Service
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.726 Answers. ( a ) Any defendant upon which a copy of a formal complaint is served shall answer such complaint in the manner prescribed under this section within 30 calendar days of service of the formal complaint by the complainant, unless otherwise directed by the Commission.
( b ) The answer shall advise the complainant and the Commission fully and completely of the nature of any defense, and shall respond specifically to all material allegations of the complaint. Every effort shall be made to narrow the issues in the answer. The defendant shall state concisely its defense to each claim asserted, admit or deny the averments on which the complainant relies, and state in detail the basis for admitting or denying such averment. General denials are prohibited. Denials based on information and belief are prohibited unless made in good faith and accompanied by a declaration or affidavit explaining the basis for the defendant's belief and why the defendant could not reasonably ascertain the facts from the complainant or any other source. If the defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an averment, the defendant shall so state and this has the effect of a denial. When a defendant intends in good faith to deny only part of an averment, the defendant shall specify so much of it as is true and shall deny only the remainder. The defendant may deny the allegations of the complaint as specific denials of either designated averments or paragraphs.
( c ) The answer shall include legal analysis relevant to the claims and arguments set forth therein.
( d ) Averments in a complaint or supplemental complaint filed pursuant to § 1.723(d) are deemed to be admitted when not denied in the answer.
( e ) Affirmative defenses to allegations in the complaint shall be specifically captioned as such and presented separately from any denials made in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( f ) The answer shall include an information designation containing: ( 1 ) The name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual likely to have information relevant to the proceeding, along with the subjects of that information, excluding individuals otherwise identified in the complaint, answer, or exhibits thereto, and individuals employed by another party; and
( 2 ) A copy—or a description by category and location—of all relevant documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things that the disclosing party has in its possession, custody, or control, excluding documents submitted with the complaint or answer.
( g ) Failure to file an answer may be deemed an admission of the material facts alleged in the complaint. Any defendant that fails to file and serve an answer within the time and in the manner prescribed by this part may be deemed in default and an order may be entered against such defendant in accordance with the allegations contained in the complaint.
[83 FR 44832, Sept. 4, 2018]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1725
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (86)
<INVENTORY>                                    3425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5130
<PP&E>                                         895
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (215)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2889
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       54
<OTHER-SE>                                     2867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5810
<SALES>                                        7494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7494
<CGS>                                          5676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1536
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             94
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                188
<INCOME-TAX>                                   17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            171
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   171
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
(1) 

Volume 2 of 3, Part A 

V. EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS— 

SEPTEMBER 13–16 & 21, 2010 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
29 
30 
31 
32 
33 
34 
35 
36 
37 
38 
39 
40 
41 
42 
43 
44 
45 
46 
47 
48 
49 
50 
51 
52 
53 
54 
55 
56 
57 
58 
59 
60 
61 
62 
63 
64 
65 
66 
67 
68 
69 
70 
71 
72 
73 
74 
75 
76 
77 
78 
79 
80 
81 
82 
83 
84 
85 
86 
87 
88 
89 
90 
91 
92 
93 
94 
95 
96 
97 
98 
99 
100 
101 
102 
103 
104 
105 
106 
107 
108 
109 
110 
111 
112 
113 
114 
115 
116
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certifications**

I, Greg Roth, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of Team Health Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:November 9, 2010
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4504

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14 (legislative day, JULY 11), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science,

and Transportation

AN ACT

To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘The Striped Bass Act of

5 1994’’.
2

HR 4504 RFS

1 TITLE I—AMENDMENTS TO THE ATLANTIC

2 STRIPED BASS CONSERVATION ACT

3 SECTION 101. ATLANTIC STRIPED BASS CONSERVATION

4 ACT AMENDMENTS.

5 Section 7(a) of the Atlantic Striped Bass Conserva6 tion Act is amended by striking ‘‘1986’’ and all that fol7 lows through ‘‘1994’’, and inserting in its place ‘‘1995 and

8 1996’’.

9 SEC. 102. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PREPARATION OF

10 PLANS AND AMENDMENTS TO PLANS FOR AT11 LANTIC STRIPED BASS.

12 Section 10 of the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation

13 Act (16 U.S.C. 1851 note) is amended to read as follows:

14 ‘‘SEC. 10. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PREPARATION OF

15 PLANS AND AMENDMENTS TO PLANS FOR AT16 LANTIC STRIPED BASS.

17 ‘‘Within 6 months after the date of the enactment

18 of the Striped Bass Act of 1994, the Commission shall

19 establish standards and procedures to ensure that the

20 Commission provides an adequate opportunity for public

21 participation in the preparation of any plan for the man22 agement of Atlantic striped bass and any amendment to

23 a plan (including any amendment to the Interstate Fish24 eries Management Plan for Striped Bass, dated October
3

HR 4504 RFS

1 1, 1981), including public hearings and procedures for the

2 submission of written comments to the Commission.’’.

3 TITLE II—AMENDMENTS TO THE

4 ANADROMOUS FISH CONSERVATION ACT

5 SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

6 Section 7(d) of the Anadromous Fish Conservation

7 Act (16 U.S.C. 757g(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘1991,

8 1992, 1993, and 1994.’’ and inserting ‘‘1994, 1995, 1996,

9 and 1997.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.