alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.5

                      CERTIFICATION OF SECRETARY/TREASURER

I, Leon M. Caldwell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of Ecuity,  Inc., for the
quarter ended December 31, 2004;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c)  presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I have  indicated  in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 19, 2005

/s/Leon M. Caldwell
---------------------
Leon M. Caldwell
Secretary/Treasurer
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Jeffrey Flammang, Chief Executive Officer of eNotes Systems, Inc.(the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Quarterly Report on 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  November 15, 2006  /s/ Jeffrey Flammang _______________________  Jeffrey Flammang President and Chief Executive Officer
Hillsborough

No. 80-302

#### The State of New Hampshire v. Charles F. Martell

April 3, 1981

*Gregory H. Smith,*attorney general *(Martha V. Gordon,*assistant attorney general, by brief and orally), for the State.

*Kevin F. Sullivan,*of Nashua, by brief and orally, for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

The defendant was convicted of driving on Route 101-A in the town of Merrimack while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, in violation of RSA 262-A:62 I (Supp. 1979). In order to sustain its burden of proving that the violation occurred on a “public way,” *see State v. Duranleau,*99 N.H. 30, 31, 104 A.2d 519, 520-21 (1954), the State had introduced into evidence a copy of the appropriate commission’s return of the laying out of Route 101-A. On appeal, the defendant contends that the Trial Court *(Souter,*J.) erred in denying his motion to dismiss based on his claim that the copy of the commission’s return of layout was insufficient to prove *268that the highway was a “public way” because it did not show (1) the actual oath taken by the commissioners, *see*RSA *233:4, (2)*that they made a personal examination of the location of the highway, see RSA 233:10, (3) that the taking was of a fee simple interest in land, *see*RSA 236:2, (4) the width of the highway, *see*RSA 233:11, or (5) that an assessment was made and damages paid or tendered, *see*RSA 233:12.

 The return of layout states that the commissioners were “duly sworn.” This is sufficient evidence of compliance with.RSA 233:4 even though it did not include the actual oath taken. The return also gives a detailed description of the layout from which the width of the highway could be determined, and the trial court was correct in presuming compliance with the other statutory requirements for a properly laid-out highway in the absence of evidence to the contrary. *Hoban v. Bucklin,*88 N.H. 73, 78-79, 184 A. 362, 365 (1936). The return therefore constituted sufficient proof' that Route 101-A was a public way. *State v. Michaud,*98 N.H. 356, 358, 100 A.2d 899, 901 (1953).

The failure of the State to introduce additional evidence on these disputed points does not, as the defendant argues, justify an inference that such evidence could not be produced.

*Appeal dismissed; affirmed.*
No. 11-1143.

#### JAS Partners, Ltd. *v.*Boyer et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 12, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00249

- CV

IN RE James Brent MANSFIELD

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On April 22, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and the real party in interest

responded. After reviewing the petition, the response, and the record, we conclude relator is

entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is

CONDITIONALLY GRANTED. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(c).

The Honorable Kirsten Cohoon is ORDERED to vacate her April 1, 2019 Order on Motion

For Temporary Orders Pending Appeal within fifteen days from the date of this order The writ

will iss ue only if we are notified that Judge Cohoon has not complied within fifteen days from the

date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on June 12, 2019

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of June, 2019.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 16

- 443CCL, styled In the Interest of H.E.W.M., a Child , pending in the

451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas, the Honorable Kirsten Cohoon presiding.
No. 11-5329.

#### Lopes *v.*Campbell, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 60-40.3 Information exempt from compulsory disclosure and which may be withheld. ( a ) The following documents or parts thereof are exempt from mandatory disclosure by the OFCCP, and should be withheld if it is determined that the requested inspection or copying does not further the public interest and might impede the discharge of any of the functions of the OFCCP. ( 1 ) Those portions of affirmative action plans such as goals and timetables which would be confidential commercial or financial information because they indicate, and only to the extent that they indicate, that a contractor plans major shifts or changes in his personnel requirements and he has not made this information available to the public. A determination to withhold this type of information should be made only after receiving verification and a satisfactory explanation from the contractor that the information should be withheld.
( 2 ) Those portions of affirmative action plans which constitute information on staffing patterns and pay scales but only to the extent that their release would injure the business or financial position of the contractor, would constitute a release of confidential financial information of an employee or would constitute an unwarranted invasion of the privacy of an employee.
( 3 ) The names of individual complainants.
( 4 ) The assignments to particular contractors of named compliance officers if such disclosure would subject the named compliance officers to undue harassment or would affect the efficient enforcement of the Executive order.
( 5 ) Compliance investigation files including the standard compliance review report and related documents, during the course of the review to which they pertain or while enforcement action against the contractor is in progress or contemplated within a reasonable time. Therefore, these reports and related files shall not be disclosed only to the extent that information contained therein constitutes trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information, inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters which would not be available by law to a private party in litigation with the agency, personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, data which would be exempt from mandatory disclosure pursuant to the “informants privilege” or such information the disclosure of which is prohibited by statute.
( 6 ) Copies of preemployment selection tests used by contractors.
( b ) Other records may be withheld consistent with the Freedom of Information Act on a case-by-case basis, with the prior approval of the Director, OFCCP.
§ 30.5 Service areas. ( a ) Except as noted in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, and except for the shared 37-37.6 GHz band, the service areas for the Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service are Partial Economic Areas.
( b ) For the 27.5-28.35 GHz band, the service areas shall be counties.
( c ) Common Carrier Fixed Point-to-Point Microwave Stations licensed in the 38.6-40 GHz bands licensed with Rectangular Service Areas shall maintain their Rectangular Service Area as defined in their authorization. The frequencies associated with Rectangular Service Area authorizations that have expired, cancelled, or otherwise been recovered by the Commission will automatically revert to the applicable county licensee.
( d ) In the 37.5-40 GHz band, Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service licensees shall not place facilities within the protection zone of Fixed-Satellite Service earth stations authorized pursuant to § 25.136 of this chapter, absent consent from the Fixed-Satellite Service earth station licensee.
056PA14-2

#### Kirby, et al. v. N.C. Department of Transportation

1. Motion to Admit Mark Miller *Pro Hoc Vice*

1. Allowed

2. Pacific Legal Foundation and Center for Law and Freedom’s Motion for Leave to File *Amicus*Brief

2. Allowed
EXHIBIT 15.1 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

100 F Street, NE 

Washington, D.C. 20549 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The firm PricewaterhouseCoopers was previously the independent registered public accounting firm for Celulosa Arauco y ConstituciónS.A. (the “Company”), and reported on the financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. We have read the Company’s statements included under Item 16F of its Annual Report onForm 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and agree with such statements except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with the Company’s statement that newly engaged accountants were not consulted regardingany of the matters or events set forth in Item 16F(a)(2) of Form 20-F. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers 

Date: ********April 30, 2012
Exhibit 31.2

I, Matthew Roberts, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of E-LOAN, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

August 9, 2004

/s/ Matthew Roberts 		  Matthew Roberts
     Chief Financial Officer

---
Exhibit 32.2
                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

     Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned  officer of Tanger GP Trust,  sole
general   partner  of  Tanger   Properties   Limited   Partnership   ("Operating
Partnership") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

          (i) the  accompanying  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of the  Operating
     Partnership  for the year ended  December  31,  2004 (the  "Report")  fully
     complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or Section  15(d),  as
     applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (ii) the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Operating Partnership.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Dated: March 14, 2005             /s/ Frank C. Marchisello Jr.
       --------------                 ----------------------------
                                      Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
                                      Treasurer & Assistant Secretary
                                      Tanger GP Trust,
                                      Sole General Partner of the Registrant
"F

150

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

McDaniel

Field

£¤95

£¤95

£¤95

W C O 2 0 1 /2 S T

S A V E N U E H

C O 2 1 S T S T S

W C O H W Y-1 5 T H

C O 2 2 N D S T S

W S T E A M B O A T S T

S A L IT Y C A N A L R D

C O 1 5 T H S T S

C O 1 8 T H S T S

W C O H W Y-1 7 T H

C O 2 1 1 /2 S T S

W C O H W Y-1 9 T H

1 S T A V E

A V E N U E I 1 /2

L O S O R O S S T

S A V E N U E J

P IC E N O D R

W C O R D

L A K IN D R

S A V E N U E I

C O A V E

A V E N U E H

S A L I T Y C A N A L R D

A V E N U E I

C O 2 0 T H S T S

S A V E N U E H

S A V E N U E H

S A L IT Y C A N A L R D

ARIZONA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

YUMA CO

S

outhwest Lateral

S

outhwest Lateral

S

o

uth

w

est L

ateral

Gadsden

Yuma Valley

Yuma

Valley

Gadsden Post Office

Somerton

Siding

Gadsden

Purchase

Gadsden

OE S

South of

Somerton

Gadsden Somerton

Yuma

West

Grays

Well

Grays

Well NE

02

00

05

36

06

36

36

04

35

36

36

99

03

08

01

36

36

36

36

09

36

000m

36

01

36

3605

36

08

N

04

36

98

09

36

11

06

36

07

36

00

36

35

03

10

3602

36

35

01

36

000m

7 704 05 7 7

99

7 706 10

10

03 707 08 7

N

7 09

02

700 711

701 7 703 704

000m

700 705 706 707 708 709 710 000m

360

35'

32'

35'

000

FEET

000 FEET

390000 FEET

FEET

590

32'30" 30"

QS

52'

PR

47'

QR

114°

114°

QR

PS PS QS

PR

30" 30"

47'30"

32° 30"

32°

114°

37'

52'

30'

30"

114°

45'

45'

32°30'

E

E

PS QS

32°37'30"

3607

550000

PR QR

50'

3611

50'

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ARIZONA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

GADSDEN, AZ-BCN

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

GADSDEN QUADRANGLE

ARIZONA-BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Imagery......................................................NAIP, July 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 11S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Arizona Coordinate System of 1983 (west

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.1

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

PS QS

PR QR

36 00

7 00

11S

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 11 ́

21 MILS

11° 36 ́

206 MILS
Order entered December 21, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-18-00967-CV IN RE TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY BO ARD

OF TRUSTEES, GARY PATTERSON, CHRIS DEL CONTE, DAVID GABLE, ZACH LACROSS, DILLON SMITH, JAMES RU SSELL "RUSTY" BURNS, AND DOUGLAS MEACHUM, Relators Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-00585-A 

### ORDER Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we CONDITIONALLY GRANT relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER the trial judge, the Honorable D’Metria Benson, to vacate her July 23, 2018 order denying relators’ plea in abatem ent and enter an order granting the plea in abatement. We further ORDER the trial judge to file with this Court within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order , a certified copy of her order issued in compliance with this order. Should the trial court fail to comply with the order, t he writ will issue.
We ORDER that relators recover their costs of this original proceeding, if any, from real party in interest Kolby Listenbee. /s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
# Comments on: 2018-1580: Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Renesas Electronics Corp.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-2231: SUTTON v. OPM [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ExhAzxyeMG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-01-2022-22-2231-sutton-v-opm-order-22-2231-order-12-1-2022_2040869\/\">22-2231: SUTTON v. OPM [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-01-2022-22-2231-sutton-v-opm-order-22-2231-order-12-1-2022_2040869\/embed\/#?secret=ExhAzxyeMG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-2231: SUTTON v. OPM [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"ExhAzxyeMG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: SUTTON v. OPM [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-2231 Origin: MSPB Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}