alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certifications**

I, DavidP. Jones, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 ofTeam Health Holdings, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 11, 2010
No. 11-5230.

#### Garrett *v.*Sandor, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF MAY 10, 2016

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD78077 Kenneth D. Forte vs. State of Missouri

WD78259 Daniel Berning vs. State of Missouri

WD78273 Charles M. O’Neal vs. State of Missouri

WD78346 Jimmie Williams vs. State of Missouri

WD78515 John E. Youngs vs. Noah Conley, A Minor, Stacey Conley, His Natural Mother,

Jamie Conley, His Natural Father

WD78587 Kenneth blake vs. Doug Worsham, et al

WD78601 Consolidated with WD78515

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD76975 State of Missouri vs. Joseph M. Braughton

WD78128 State of Missouri vs. Ervin D. Carroll, Jr.

WD78164 State of Missouri vs. Alfonso Rodriguez

WD78582 State of Missouri vs. Jeremy A. Brady
12

13

2

0

14

18

15

19

16

17

10

11

7

8

9

6

A

r

e

a

s

M

o

v

e

d

b

e

t

w

e

e

n

E

n

j

oin

e

d

Pla

n

a

n

d

R

e

s. 2

3

-

2

7

1

r Dr e iv R thr o N

NW

869 y wHet at S

869 y wHet at S

Biscayne Blvd Blvd ne ay sc Bi

State Hwy 90

N Miami Ave S Miami Ave

NW 2nd Ave

r eT ht 11 WN

t Sr le gal F W t Sr el gal F W

SW 2nd Ave

NW 3rd Ave

NW 4th Ave

SW 3rd Ave

NW 6th Ave

NW 5th Ave

NE 2nd Ave

NW 1st Ave

NW 1st Ave

SW 4th Ave

SW 5th Ave

E F al g el r St

SW 6th Ave

SE 2nd Ave

SW 1st Ave

t S ht 21 WN

t S ht 11 WN

t S ht 01 WN

SE 3rd Ave

14 y wH SU

NE 1st Ave

t S dn2 WN

NE 11th St

NE 11th St

NE 10th St

t S dn2 WS t S dn2 WS

NW 3rd Ct

t S dr 3 WN

t S ht 9 WN

t S ht 6 WN

t S ht 4 WN

t S ht 8 WN

t S dr 3 WS t S dr 3 WS

NE 2nd St

t St s1 WN t St s1 WN

t S ht 6 WS

t S ht 5 WS

t S ht 4 WS

t S ht 7 WS

1 y wH SU

t St s1 WS t St s1 WS

NE 3rd St

NE 8th St

NE 4th St

SE 3rd St

NE 9th St

NE 5th St

NE 7th St

NE 6th St

NE 1st St

SE 5th St

SE 4th St

8th St SE

SE 1st S

5

t

93-I 593 -I

59-I

95 I17

19

2

0

12

11

D

o

w

nto

w

n

Inset

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-31 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 27.903 Coordination requirements. ( a ) The licensee in the 1670-1675 MHz band will be issued a geographic area license on a nationwide basis in accordance with § 27.6(f).
( b ) Licensees in the 1670-1675 MHz band must file a separate station application with the Commission and obtain an individual station license, prior to construction or operation, of any station: ( 1 ) That requires submission of an Environmental Assessment under part 1, § 1.1307 of this chapter;
( 2 ) That requires international coordination;
( 3 ) That operates in areas listed under part 1, § 1.924 of this chapter.
( c ) The application required in paragraph (b) of this section must be filed on the Universal Licensing System.
( d ) Prior to construction of a station, a licensee must register with the Commission any station antenna structure for which notification to the Federal Aviation Administration is required by part 17 of this chapter.
( e ) It is the licensee's responsibility to determine whether an individual station requires referral to the Commission.
[67 FR 41856, June 20, 2002, as amended at 69 FR 17958, Apr. 6, 2004]
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 40847 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Roberto Rivera**

**- Loera,** 

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:20

- cr

- 243

- 1

Before **Barksdale, Higginson,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
In May 2020, Roberto Rivera

- Loera pleaded guilty to transporting an
alien , in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), (a)(1)(A)(v)(II), (a)(1)(B)(ii) , and was sentenced to two years ’ probation. The district court

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 25, 2022
Lyle W. Ca yce Clerk Case: 21-40847 Document: 00516405875 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/25/2022No. 21

- 40847

2 i n October 2021 revoked Rivera’s probation for failure to comply with its
terms and sentenced him to six months ’ impr isonment.
For this resulting appeal, our court granted Rivera ’s requested remand to permit the district court to correct the written judgment

.
Because that court has granted the requested relief on limited remand, and as Rivera accordingly acknowledges in his subsequent 10 June 2022 letter

to our court, this appeal is moot. See United States v. Heredia

- Holguin , 823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc) ( explaining “ case becomes moot only when it is impossible for a court to grant any effectual relief whatever to the prevailing party” (citation omitted) )

.
**D ISMISSED** 

. Case: 21-40847 Document: 00516405875 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/25/2022
§ 18.212 Compliance information. ( a ) Equipment authorized under Supplier's Declaration of Conformity shall include a compliance statement that contains the information set forth in § 2.1077 of this chapter and a statement identical or similar to the following: “*This device complies with part 18 of the FCC Rules.”*
( b ) The compliance information may be placed in the instruction manual, on a separate sheet, on the packaging, or electronically as permitted under § 2.935 of this chapter. There is no specific format for this information.
[82 FR 50834, Nov. 2, 2017]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Notice of Court Closure on November 26, 2021 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"L2mBvc8kRc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-court-closure-on-november-26-2021\/\">Notice of Court Closure on November 26, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-court-closure-on-november-26-2021\/embed\/#?secret=L2mBvc8kRc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Court Closure on November 26, 2021” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"L2mBvc8kRc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will be closed on Friday, November 26, 2021, in addition to the federal holiday of Thursday, November 25, 2021. For purposes of computation of time and motions to en-large time under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 and Federal Circuit Rule 26, November 26, 2021, […]"}
No. 11-9624.

#### Lewis v. Washington.

Sup. Ct. Wash. Certio-rari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 00-15701) published on pages 38831 and 38832 of the issue for Thursday, June 22, 2000. 

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago heading, the entry for Michael Robert Reese, Appleton, Wisconsin, is revised to read as follows: 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Phillip Jackson, Applications Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                 

1. Michael Robert Reese, Appleton, Wisconsin; to acquire voting shares of Fox River Valley Bancorp, Inc., Appleton, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First Business Bank of Fox River Valley, Appleton, Wisconsin. 

Comments on this application must be received by July 6, 2000.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 28, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-16835 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1161 Conditional license grants and delegated authorizations. ( a ) Grant of any application or an instrument of authorization or other filing for which an annual or multiple year regulatory fee is required to accompany the application or filing will be conditioned upon final payment of the current or delinquent regulatory fees. Current annual and multiple year regulatory fees must be paid electronically as described in § 1.1112(e). For all other fees, (*e.g., application fees, delinquent regulatory fees*) final payment shall mean receipt by the U.S. Treasury of funds cleared by the financial institution on which the check, cashier's check, or money order is drawn. Electronic payments are considered timely when a wire transfer was received by the Commission's bank no later than 6:00 p.m. on the due date; confirmation to pay.gov that a credit card payment was successful no later than 11:59 p.m. (EST) on the due date; or confirmation an ACH was credited no later than 11:59 p.m. (EST) on the due date.
( b ) In those instances where the Commission has granted a request for deferred payment of a regulatory fee, further processing of the application or filing or the grant of authority shall be conditioned upon final payment of the regulatory fee and any required penalties for late payment prescribed by the deferral decision. Failure to comply with the terms of the deferral decision shall result in the automatic dismissal of the submission or rescission of the Commission authorization. Further, the Commission shall: ( 1 ) Notify the grantee that the authorization has been rescinded. Upon such notification, the grantee will immediately cease operations initiated pursuant to the authorization; and
( 2 ) Treat as late filed any application resubmitted after the original deadline for filing the application.
( c ) ( 1 ) Where an applicant is found to be delinquent in the payment of regulatory fees, the Commission will make a written request for the fee, together with any penalties that may be rendered under this subpart. Such request shall inform the regulatee that failure to pay may result in the Commission withholding action on any application or request filed by the applicant. The staff shall also inform the regulatee of the procedures for seeking Commission review of the staff's determination.
( 2 ) If, after final determination that the fee is due or that the applicant is delinquent in the payment of fees and payment is not made in a timely manner, the staff will withhold action on the application or filing until payment or other satisfactory arrangement is made. If payment or satisfactory arrangement is not made within 30 days, the application will be dismissed.
[60 FR 34032, June 29, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 27848, May 17, 2004; 80 FR 66816, Oct. 30, 2015]
---

EXHIBIT 32(a)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
  OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 
  1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Hendrx
  Corp. (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report),
  I, Robert De Costa, chief executive officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
  U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                           
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | The information contained in this Report
        fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operation of the Registrant.

|*/s/ George Solymar*    | 
|----------------------- | 
|George Solymar          | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|May 11, 2007            | 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant
  to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
  extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant
  for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under
  the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective
  of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required
  by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the
  Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
  upon request.

---
No. 11-979.

#### Cooper et al. *v.*Boyce & Isley, PLLC, et al.

Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.
Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the USAID Malaria Vaccine Development Program (MVDP) Federal Advisory Committee. The meeting will be held from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on February 2, 2000 and from 9 a.m. to noon on February 3, 2000 at the Conference Room of the Environmental Health Project located in Suite 300, 1611 North Kent Street in Arlington, VA 22209-2111.

The agenda will concentrate on the activities of the MVDP over the past six months and on future plans. The meeting will be open to the public on 2 February unless it is necessary to discuss procurement sensitive information; should this be the case, it will be announced and the meeting closed at the appropriate time. Such issues will be discussed on 3 February on which date the meeting will be closed. Any interested person may attend the meeting, may file written statements with the committee before or after the meeting, or present any oral statements in accordance with procedures established by the committee, to the extent that time available for the meeting permits.

Those wishing to attend the meeting or to obtain additional information about the USAID MVDP should contact Carter Diggs, the designated Federal Officer for the USAID MVDP Federal Advisory Committee at the Office of Health and Nutrition, USAID/G/PHN/HN/EH, Room 3.07-013, 3rd floor, RRB, Washington, DC 20523-3700, telephone (202) 712-5728, Fax (202) 216-3702, cdiggs@usaid.gov.

Carter Diggs,

USAID Designated Federal Officer, Technical Advisor, Malaria Vaccine, Development Program.

[FR Doc. 00-1672 Filed 1-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
792 A.2d 410

#### IN THE MATTER OF DAVID S. BRANTLEY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 235381970).

March 21, 2002.

ORDER

This Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-323, recommending that DAVID S. BRANTLEY, of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, should be disbarred for violating *RPC*3.3(a)(1) (giving false or misleading statement to a tribunal or court);

And respondent having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And the Court having ordered this date that respondent be suspended from practice for a period of two years for the unethical conduct found in DRB 00-331, effective April 15, 2002;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID S. BRANTLEY is suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years, consecutive to *82the two-year suspension imposed in DRB 00-331 and until the further Order of the Court, effective April 15, 2004; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
§ 24.415 Technical content of applications; maintenance of list of station locations. ( a ) All applications required by this part shall contain all technical information required by the application forms or associated public notice(s). Applications other than initial applications for a narrowband PCS license must also comply with all technical requirements of the rules governing the narrowband PCS (see subparts C and D as appropriate). The following paragraphs describe a number of general technical requirements.
( b ) Each application (except applications for initial licenses filed on Form 175) for a radio station authorization for narrowband PCS must comply with the provisions of §§ 24.129 through 24.135.
( c ) - ( i ) [Reserved]
( j ) The location of the transmitting antenna shall be considered to be the station location. Narrowband PCS licensees must maintain a current list of all station locations, which must describe the transmitting antenna site by its geographical coordinates and also by conventional reference to street number, landmark, or the equivalent. All such coordinates shall be specified in terms of degrees, minutes, and seconds to the nearest second of latitude and longitude.
[59 FR 26749, May 24, 1994; 59 FR 43898, Aug. 25, 1994]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 
(IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved 
Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming 
activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has 
approved the Tribal-State Compacts between the Augustine Band of 
Mission Indians and the State of California executed on March 15, 2000.

DATES: This action is effective July 6, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: June 26, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-16985 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P