alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1626: IDEAHUB INC. v. UNIFIED PATENTS, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FY5dQwV16K\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/04-21-2022-22-1626-ideahub-inc-v-unified-patents-inc-order-22-1626-order-4-21-2022_1939717\/\">22-1626: IDEAHUB INC. v. UNIFIED PATENTS, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/04-21-2022-22-1626-ideahub-inc-v-unified-patents-inc-order-22-1626-order-4-21-2022_1939717\/embed\/#?secret=FY5dQwV16K\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1626: IDEAHUB INC. v. UNIFIED PATENTS, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"FY5dQwV16K\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: IDEAHUB INC. v. UNIFIED PATENTS, INC. [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1626 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT - 99.1

                                  MOSSIMO, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mossimo, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Mossimo Giannulli,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition, results of
                  operations, and cash flows of the Company.


/S/      MOSSIMO GIANNULLI
--------------------------
         Mossimo Giannulli
         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
         March 5, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Depomed, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl A. Pelzel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 8, 2010/s/ CARL A. PELZEL Carl A. Pelzel President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greater Atlantic Financial Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Carroll E. Amos, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

A.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

B.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.



                                           By: /s/ Carroll E. Amos
                                           -----------------------
                                           Carroll E. Amos
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


                                           Date: February 14, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, (Teleconference).                    

*Date:*                         July 13, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         45 Natcher Bldg, Rm 5As.25u, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John R. Lymangrover PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Natcher Bldg., Room 5As25n, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4952.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-17099  Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Civ. No. 2054.

Second Appellate District.

February 19, 1918.]

#### BARKER BROTHERS (a Corporation), Appellant, v. J. JOE JOOS et al., Respondents.

Appeal—Alternative Method—Review op Typewritten Transcripts. In view of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, which requires that the parties who present a cause on appeal by the alternative method shall print' in their briefs such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court, where no portions of the record are printed in appellant’s brief, and references are made to the pages of the typewritten transcripts only, appellate courts will not look to the typewritten transcripts for the purpose of determining whether ground exists for reversal of the judgment appealed from.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Leslie R. Hewitt, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

A. P. Michael Narlian, and N. B. Nelson, for Appellant.

Geo. S. Hupp, and Lynden Bowring, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

It is stated in the brief of plaintiff in this case that the appeal is from a judgment for the return *312of certain personal property to the intervener-respondent, or for the value thereof. The appeal is taken under the alternative method. No portions of the record are printed in appellant’s brief. References are made to the pages of the typewritten transcripts only. Section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure requires that the parties who present a cause on appeal by the alternative method print in their briefs such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court. It has been repeatedly held that appellate courts will not look to the typewritten transcripts filed under the alternative method of appeal for the purpose of determining whether ground exists for the reversal of the judgment appealed from. *(Jones*v. *American Potash Co.,*35 Cal. App. 128, [169 Pac. 397]; *Marcucci*v. *Vowinckel,*164 Cal. 693, [130 Pac. *430]; Wills*v. *Woolner,*21 Cal. App. 528, [132 Pac. 283]; *Miller*v. *Oliver,*174 Cal. 407, [163 Pac. 357]; *Pasadena Realty Co.*v. *Clune,*34 Cal. App. 33, [166 Pac. 1025]; *McKinnell*v. *Hansen,*34 Cal. App. 76, [167 Pac. *887]; California Sav. & Commercial Bank*v. *Canne,*34 Cal. App. 768, [169 Pac. 395]; *Stewart*v. *Andrews,*35 Cal. App. 230, [169 Pac. 397]; *Huffaker*v. *McVey,*35 Cal. App. 302, [169 Pac. 704]; *Hepler*v. *Wright,*35 Cal. App. 567, [170 Pac. 667]; *Anderson*v. *Recorder’s Court, ante,*p. 123, [171 Pac. 812]; *Blochman Commercial & Sav. Bank*v. *Ketcham, ante,*p. 284, [171 Pac. 1084].)

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1621 Definitions. ( a ) *Medium of mass communications* means: ( 1 ) A daily newspaper;
( 2 ) A cable television system; and
( 3 ) A license or construction permit for ( i ) A television station, including low power TV or TV translator,
( ii ) A standard (AM) radio station,
( iii ) An FM radio station,
( iv ) A direct broadcast satellite transponder under the editorial control of the licensee, and
( v ) A Multipoint Distribution Service station.
( b ) *Minority group* means: ( 1 ) Blacks,
( 2 ) Hispanics
( 3 ) American Indians,
( 4 ) Alaska Natives,
( 5 ) Asians, and
( 6 ) Pacific Islanders.
( c ) *Owner* means the applicant and any individual, partnership, trust, unincorporated association, or corporation which: ( 1 ) If the applicant is a proprietorship, is the proprietor,
( 2 ) If the applicant is a partnership, holds any partnership interest,
( 3 ) If the applicant is a trust, is the beneficiary thereof,
( 4 ) If the applicant is an unincorporated association or non-stock corporation, is a member, or, in the case of a nonmembership association or corporation, a director,
( 5 ) If the applicant is a stock corporation, is the beneficial owner of voting shares.
Note 1:
For purposes of applying the diversity preference to such entities only the other ownership interests of those with a 1% or more beneficial interest in the entity will be cognizable.
Note 2:
For the purposes of this section, a daily newspaper is one which is published four or more days per week, which is in the English language, and which is circulated generally in the community of publication. A college newspaper is not considered as being circulated generally.
Note 3:
For the purposes of applying the diversity preference, the ownership interests of the spouse of an applicant's principal will not presumptively be attributed to the applicant.
[48 FR 27202, June 13, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 5992, Feb. 13, 1985]
No. 11-5429.

#### Seaver, aka Skandha *v.*Conrad et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 101.505 Frequencies.

Frequencies, and the conditions on which they are available, for DEMS operations are contained in this subpart as well as in § 101.147(m), (n), and (r)(9).

[65 FR 59359, Oct. 5, 2000]
n 1 ^ T\Z ^rkt^ " rPARTMENT OF OFFICE OF EXTERNAL RELATIONS 

Vjldl i\&Ull .V\NSP0RW10N 

•;:..';hT OPERATIONS 

?QIO nCT 1 3 A % I 1 

UNIVERSIT Y 

September 3, 2010 

Susan L. Kurland 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Grant Application of Town of Massena Under the DOT Small Community Air Service 

Development Program 

DOCKET DOT-OST-2010-0124 

Dear Ms. Kurland: 

Clarkson University provides it highest support and endorsement for the application filed by the Town of Massena 

to market Essential Air Service (EAS) at the Massena International Airport. We are committed to helping the 

partners in the Small Community Air Service grant achieve the objectives as outlined in the grant application. 

Specifically, we understand and agree to assist the Town of Massena with: 

• Planning and implementing grant-funded "Fly Massena" events/promotions to encourage use of the 

EAS service at the Massena Airport 

• Providing input into "Fly Massena" marketing materials 

• Providing guidance and assistance to professionals working on air service data collection and market 

research in support of improving EAS enplanements 

As the third smallest nationally ranked research university in the United States, Clarkson depends upon reliable 

transportation services and options for our university community members as well as our distinguished guests, 

prospective students and employees, and their families. Clarkson commends the ongoing work of the Town of 

Massena, and of the St. Lawrence Valley Air Task Force from 2004-2009, toward improving air service in the 

central part of the rural, Northern New York Canadian border region. We agree that increasing enplanement 

numbers in Massena, through the EAS marketing program proposed in its grant application, is the next step in the 

process of attracting a carrier that will work with us to move beyond subsidized air service. 

We encourage US DOT to award the Town of Massena grant funding to promote their EAS service. In return, we 

will do our best, as a community partner, to assure the success of the "Fly Massena" campaign. 

5r External Relations 

cc: Joseph D. Gray, Supervisor, Town of Massena 

Kelly O.Chezum'04 M.B.A. 

Vice President for External Relations and Assistant Secretary of the Board of Trustees 

Clarkson University | PO Box 5500 | Potsdam, New Yorl< 13699-5500 

315-268-4483 | FAX 315-268-7993 | email: chezumk@clarkson.edu
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 131 (Friday, July 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17132]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting

    This is to give notice, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2 section 10(a), that the 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Agricultural Advisory Committee 
will conduct a public meeting on July 19, 2000, in the first floor 
hearing room (Room 1000) of the Commission's Washington, DC 
headquarters, Three Lafayette Centre, 1151 21st Street, NW, Washington, 
DC 20581. The meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. and last until 5 p.m. The 
agenda will consist of the following:

Agenda

1. Welcoming Remarks
2. CFTC Regulatory Reinvention Proposal
3. Presentation by U.S. Exchange Representatives
4. Legislative Update
5. Recent Innovations in Agricultural Risk Management and Marketing
6. Other business

    The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Advisory 
Committee, Commissioner David D. Spears, is empowered to conduct the 
meeting in a fashion that will, in his judgement, facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to 
file a written statement with the Advisory Committee should mail a copy 
of the statement to the attention of: The Agricultural Advisory 
Committee, c/o Commissioner David D. Spears, Commodity Futures Trading 
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, 
DC 20581, before the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make 
oral statements should inform Commissioner Spears in writing at the 
foregoing address at least three business days before the meeting. 
Reasonable provision will be made, if time permits, for an oral 
presentation of no more than five minutes each in duration.

    Issued by the Commission in Washington, DC on June 30, 2000.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-17132 Filed 7-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
PUBLIC LAW 112–160—AUG. 10, 2012 126 STAT. 1271 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3412: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

June 26, 28, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–160 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1421 Veterans 

Memorial Drive in Abbeville, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Sergeant Richard Franklin Abshire 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT RICHARD FRANKLIN ABSHIRE POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1421 Veterans Memorial Drive in Abbeville, 

Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Richard 

Franklin Abshire Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Richard Franklin Abshire Post Office Building’’. 

Approved August 10, 2012. 

Aug. 10, 2012 

[H.R. 3412] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Notice of Proposed Amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6SRLZBGoXU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-proposed-amendments-to-the-federal-circuit-rules-of-practice\/\">Notice of Proposed Amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-proposed-amendments-to-the-federal-circuit-rules-of-practice\/embed\/#?secret=6SRLZBGoXU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Proposed Amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"6SRLZBGoXU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2071(b) and Federal Circuit Rule 47(a), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit gives notice that it proposes to amend Federal Circuit Rules of Practice 25, 27, 28, 28.1, 30, 31, 32, 33, 33.1, 34, 35, 40, 41, 47.4, and 47.5, and the Practice Notes to Rules […]"}
EXHIBIT 32.1


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Softwall Equipment
Corporation, on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Randall Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 18, 2004           /S/ Lionel Drage
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  Lionel Drage
                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                  Principle Accounting Officer