alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT        32.2

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In        connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (this        “report”), of SPAR Group, Inc. (the “registrant”), the undersigned        hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

1.         The report fully        complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of        1934, as amended, and

2.         The information        contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition        and results of operations of the registrant.

 

|   |   | /s/ James R. Segreto                             |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | James R. Segreto                                 |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
|   |   |                                             |
|   |   | March 31, 2008                                   |

 

**A        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR        Group, Inc. and will be retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and        Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

 

Ex-10
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Abraham Pierce, President and Chief Executive Officer of Fonecash, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on 10QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 10, 2005



/s/ Abraham Pierce

_______________________



Abraham Pierce

President and Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2FaRWH2e8R\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/\">Home<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/embed\/#?secret=2FaRWH2e8R\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Home” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"2FaRWH2e8R\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Daily Schedule Opinions & Orders eFiling (CM\/ECF) eFiling Procedures Forms Case Lookup (PACER) Daily Schedule Opinions & Orders eFiling (CM\/ECF) eFiling Procedures Forms Case Lookup (PACER) Contact Us 717 Madison Place, NW Washington, DC 20439 (202) 275-8000 \u00a0 Clerk’s Office Room 401 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m. (ET) Monday-Friday Notices & Announcements View all announcements Subscribe for […]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CR402cropped-1024x277.jpg"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6730-4] 

The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Environmental Financial Advisory Board (EFAB) will hold an open meeting of the full Board in San Francisco, California on August 7-8, 2000. The meeting will be held at the World Trade Club, Ferry Building, in the International Room. The Monday, August 7 session will run from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and the August 8 session will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at approximately 12 noon. 

EFAB is chartered with providing analysis and advice to the EPA Administrator on environmental finance. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss progress with work products under EFAB's current strategic action agenda and to develop an action agenda to direct the Board's activities. Environmental financing topics expected to be discussed include: Financing Issues Related to the Office of Water's Gap Analysis, Environmental and Multi-State Revolving Funds, Cost-effective Environmental Management, Brownfields Redevelopment, and International Environmental Financing. 

The meeting is open to the public, but seating is limited. For further information, please contact Vanessa Bowie, EFAB Coordinator, U.S. EPA on (202) 564-5186. 

Dated: June 28, 2000. 

Ronald Bachand, 

Acting Deputy Comptroller. 

[FR Doc. 00-17071 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4492

To extend the authorization for appropriations for the Commodity Futures

Trading Commission for five fiscal years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1994

Mr. DE LA GARZA (for himself, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota,

and Mr. COMBEST) (all by request) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To extend the authorization for appropriations for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for five fiscal years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That this Act may be cited as the ‘‘CFTC Reauthorization

4 Act of 1994’’.

5 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

6 Effective October 1, 1994, section 12(d) of the Com7 modity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 16(d)) is amended to read

8 as follows:
2

HR 4492 IH

1 ‘‘(d) To carry out this Act, there are authorized to

2 be appropriated such sums as are necessary for each of

3 the 1995 through 1999 fiscal years.’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
I, Carl E. Vogel, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CC VHoldings, LLC and CC V Holdings Finance, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ Carl E. VogelCarl E. VogelChief Executive Officer
No. 11-9468.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5462.

#### Tinajero-Ortiz *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40390 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

DEANDRE BENNETT , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16

- CR

- 76

- 1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Deandre Bennett
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bennett has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to all ow us to make a fair evaluation of Bennett ’s claims of
ine ffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider th ose claims

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 27, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40390 Document: 00515286381 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/27/2020No. 19

- 40390

2 without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief , the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, and Bennett ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivol ous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Bennett’s motion to appoint new counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902

– 03 (5th Cir. 1998)

. Case: 19-40390 Document: 00515286381 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/27/2020
389A15

#### State v. Tae Kwon Hammonds

State’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief (COA15-53)

Allowed 04/29/2016
Foundational Solar Resource ResearchNational Renewable Energy LaboratoryKirsten Orwig, Stephen Wilcox, Manajit Sengupta, Aron Habte, Mary Anderberg, Thomas Stoff

Figure 5

Figure 2. Impact of solar spectrum

variability on different instruments

Figure 3. Probability distribution of

ramp rates over the 99th percentile.

Figure 4. Scatter plot for cloudy and clear 

conditions in Hanford, CA 

National Solar Radiation Database (NSRDB)• Long-term, serially complete, hourly solar irradiance for 1991–2005• Three formats available:

- Hourly, 10km gridded irradiance- Hourly, 10km gridded irradiance and meteorological fields- Hourly irradiance at 1,454 locations

• Recently updated to include 2005–2010 and additional locations

The Solar Resource Characterization Group conducts foundational solar radiation and powsupports industry, government, and academia by providing solar measurements, models, msupport services. These resources are used to plan, develop, and integrate renewable ener

Support Services

Solar measurements and products

Solar Characterization

Solar irradiance and power modeling and analysis

Foreca

Typical Meteorological Year (TMY)• Hourly meteorological data that represent the “typical” climate for a

specific location.

• Applications: solar power system development, P50/P90 analysis, 

financing solar power systems, building efficiency performance, and others

Solar Variability• Impacts of solar spectrum variability on measurement uncertainty• Optimization of distributed solar system allocation within a geographic 

region to maximize generation and minimize variability

• Intra-plant and plant-to-plant variabilitySatellite-Derived Irradiance

• Global Solar Insolation 

Project (GSIP)

• Performance of physicsbased versus empiricallybased irradiance estimates 

from satellite

• Verificat

High ReRefresh irradianperform

• Nowcas

sky ima

Figure 1. New map of NSRDB locations for 1991–2010 update.

Presented at the SunShot Grand Challenge Sum

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewab
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CR-20505-GAYLES/TORRES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs.

KEVIN ABARCA, 

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’ Report 

and Recommendation on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Counts One, Six, Nine, Twelve, and Fifteen 

for Lack of Jurisdiction (the “Report”). [ECF No. 253]. On December 22, 2023, Defendant Kevin 

Abarca (“Defendant”) filed his Motion to Dismiss Counts One, Six, Nine, Twelve, and Fifteen for 

Lack of Jurisdiction (the “Motion”). [ECF No. 183]. The United States of America (the 

“Government”) filed its Response in opposition to the Motion on January 18, 2024. [ECF No. 203].

On January 31, 2024, the Motion was referred to Judge Torres for a report and recommendation. 

[ECF No. 209]. On March 26, 2024, Judge Torres issued the Report which recommends that the 

Court deny Defendant’s Motion as to all counts. [ECF No. 253]. Defendant filed his Objections to 

the Report on April 9, 2024. [ECF No. 267]. 

A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which 

objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings 

that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see 

Case 1:22-cr-20505-DPG Document 273 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/16/2024 Page 1 of 2
2

also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific 

objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint 

Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 

208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). 

This Court, having conducted a de novo review of the record, agrees with Judge Torres’ 

well-reasoned analysis and conclusion that the Motion should be denied.

Accordingly, after careful consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’ Report and Recommendation on 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Counts One, Six, Nine, Twelve, and Fifteen for 

Lack of Jurisdiction, [ECF No. 253], is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED and 

incorporated into this Order by reference; and

(2) Defendant Kevin Abarca’s Motion to Dismiss Counts One, Six, Nine, Twelve, and 

Fifteen for Lack of Jurisdiction, [ECF No. 183], is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 16th day of April, 2024. 

________________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cr-20505-DPG Document 273 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/16/2024 Page 2 of 2
No. 11-9408.

#### Phernetton *v.*Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EPA Carbon Pollution Hearing 

Thursday, May 241

h 2012 

Testimony- Bob Bingaman, Sierra Club 

Good afternoon. My name is Bob Bingaman and I am the National Organizing Director 

for the Sierra Club. 

I wanted to speak today on why the Sierra Club supports the Environmental Protection 

Agency's tirst-evcr carbon pollution standards for new power plants and how this will 

benefit the American people. 

The science and data before us in conclusive: Scientists tell us that climate change is real, 

it is happening, and it presents some very real threats to our health and societal wellbeing. Fueled by carbon pollution, doctors and nurses tell us that as the temperature rises, 

so will the instances of smog-induced asthma and respiratory illness. 

As part of my job with Sierra Club, I travel regularly, meeting with environmental 

organizers all across the country. I see tirst-hand the detrimental health effects that 

carbon pollution and other dangerous pollutants from coal-tired power plants pose to 

communities. Tens of thousands of people from Virginia to Nevada, to right here in 

Illinois, suffer from the real, and sometimes fatal, consequences of power plants not 

bearing responsibility for the pollution they spew out. This not only devastates families, 

but it also increases the burden on our already strapped health service programs. 

Additionally, a warmer world will mean more extreme weather, causing damage via 

wild tires to our homes and national lands, reduced crop yields and water shortages, an 

increase in insect pests and prevalence of insect spread diseases, and intensified 

precipitation events such as hurricanes, storm surges and flooding. This will cost us lives 

and livelihoods, and also hurt our economic recovery by costing billions of dollars in 

damages. 

Thankfully, the EPA is moving forward and taking steps to hold polluters accountable for 

the industrial carbon pollution they spew into our air. Before these standards, there were 

no national limits on the amount of carbon pollution a plant could emit. These standards 

not only represent the end of an era in which big polluters are given a free pass to poison 

our communities, they also represent a new beginning for American innovation and 

energy production. By taking steps to modernize our energy fleet, the Obama 

Administration is continuing the momentum toward a clean energy future. 

In closing, I want to thank EPA for their efforts to protect public health, protect our 

planet, and spur 21st-century innovation and modernization of our energy fleet. I urge 

EPA to move forward quickly with this critically important standard. Thank you.
No. 11-5345.

#### Cephas *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:23:53-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
161P16

#### State v. Roger Christopher Oxendine

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-608)

Denied
Exhibit








	
							
	Exhibit 10.17

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVES WITH MANAGEMENT CONTINUITY AGREEMENTS
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Title
	 
	Name
	 
	Years /Comp*
	 
	Excise Tax Gross Up?

	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 
	 
	Robert M. Patterson
	 
	3
	 
	Y

	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
	 
	Bradley C. Richardson
	 
	2
	 
	N

	Senior Vice President, President of Designed Structures and Solutions
	 
	Richard N. Altice
	 
	2
	 
	N

	Senior Vice President, President of Distribution
	 
	Mark D. Crist
	 
	2 
	 
	N

	Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer
	 
	Michael A. Garratt
	 
	2
	 
	N

	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	 
	Lisa K. Kunkle
	 
	3
	 
	Y

	Senior Vice President, Global Operations and Process Improvement
	 
	M. John Midea, Jr. 
	 
	2
	 
	N

	Senior Vice President, President of Specialty Engineered Materials
	 
	Craig M. Nikrant
	 
	2
	 
	N

	Senior Vice President, Mergers & Acquisitions
	 
	Joel R. Rathbun
	 
	2
	 
	N

	Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
	 
	João José San Martin Neto
	 
	2
	 
	N

	Senior Vice President, President of Color, Additives and Inks
	 
	John V. Van Hulle
	 
	2
	 
	N

	Senior Vice President, President of Performance Products and Solutions
	 
	Donald K. Wiseman
	 
	2
	 
	N




* Years of compensation payable upon change of control