alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 27.1001 1915-1920 MHz and 1995-2000 MHz bands subject to competitive bidding.

Mutually exclusive initial applications for 1915-1920 MHz and 1995-2000 MHz band licenses are subject to competitive bidding. The general competitive bidding procedures set forth in 47 CFR part 1, subpart Q will apply unless otherwise provided in this subpart.
§ 24.404 Eligibility. ( a ) *General.* Authorizations will be granted upon proper application if: ( 1 ) The applicant is qualified under the applicable laws and the regulations, policies and decisions issued under the laws, including § 24.12;
( 2 ) There are frequencies available to provide satisfactory service; and
( 3 ) The public interest, convenience or necessity would be served by a grant.
( b ) *Alien ownership.* A narrowband PCS authorization to provide Commercial Mobile Radio Service may not be granted to or held by: ( 1 ) Any alien or the representative of any alien.
( 2 ) Any corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government.
( 3 ) Any corporation of which more than one-fifth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens or their representatives or by a foreign government or representative thereof or any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country.
( 4 ) Any corporation directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than one-fourth of the capital stock is owned or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a foreign government or representative thereof, or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country, if the Commission finds that the public interest will be served by the refusal or revocation of such license. A Narrowband PCS authorization to provide Private Mobile Radio Service may not be granted to or held by a foreign government or a representative thereof.
[59 FR 26749, May 24, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 55581, Oct. 28, 1996; 65 FR 35855, June 6, 2000]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1392: SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION v. US [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zFZZkNtzoh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-13-2023-22-1392-solar-energy-industries-association-v-us-opinion-22-1392-opinion-11-13-2023_2220699\/\">22-1392: SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION v. US [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-13-2023-22-1392-solar-energy-industries-association-v-us-opinion-22-1392-opinion-11-13-2023_2220699\/embed\/#?secret=zFZZkNtzoh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1392: SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION v. US [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"zFZZkNtzoh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION v. US [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1392 Origin: CIT Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Hiv-Vac, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Hiv-Vac,   Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on August 14, 2002 (the "Report"),  I, Sally
De Principe,  the Chief Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Sally De Principe
---------------------------
Sally De Principe
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
SCWC-17-0000695

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

EDELMIRA SALAYES ARAIZA,

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAIʻI,

Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-17-0000695; CR. NO. 14-1-0162; S.P.P. NO. 15-1-0007)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and 

Circuit Judge Browning, in place of Pollack, J., recused)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant’s Application for Writ 

of Certiorari, filed on June 24, 2020, is hereby accepted and 

will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be 

notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 29, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ R. Mark Browning

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000695

29-JUL-2020

02:50 PM
#### § 22.959 Rules governing processing of applications for initial systems.

Pending applications for authority to operate the first cellular system on a channel block in an MSA or RSA market continue to be processed under the rules governing the processing of such applications that were in effect when those applications were filed, unless the Commission determines otherwise in a particular case.
157P16

#### State v. Danielle Star Reynolds

Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court, Onslow County

Dismissed 05/19/2016
# JPME Graduate Russell Recognized for Cyber Article

/ Published Aug. 12, 2016

August 2016 - 

The 2016 MajGen Harold W. Chase Prize Essay Contest resulted in the submission of articles ranging from reorganizing the Marine rifle squad to the importance of knowing history.  

NDU iCollege JPME graduate, LtCol Brian E. Russell received an honorable mention ($500 and a plaque) for his article titled “The Real Cyber Paradigm: Exploiting Excess Capacity.”  LtCol Russell maintains that if recognized as a domain, cyberspace can actually be an exploited environment if our Marines have access and authorization to operate in that space.  

Full information can be found on the Marine Corps Gazette website: https://www.mca-marines.org/gazette/2016/08/majgen-harold-w-chase-prize-essay-contest-winners-2016# .
# 2023 DoD UC2 Workshop Hosted by CIC

/ Published Oct. 3, 2023
December 6, 2023, 
UC2 will be hosting a workshop on December 6, 2023. This session's topics are 1) *Implementing Zero Trust at the Tactical Warfighting Edge* and 2) *Managing Cyber Risks to Missions.*The first-place winning research team for each topic will present their findings. The latter half of the day will provide opportunities for the collaborative shaping of future UC2 research questions. 

**Agenda Available for Download Here**

Register Now →
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.60005 Program benefits. ( a ) *Program benefits.* The following benefits for license(s) included in an ECIP Qualifying Transaction filed pursuant to § 1.60002, shall be conferred upon consummation of a Commission approved assignment application, grant of a *de facto* transfer lease application, or acceptance of a spectrum manager lease application, as specified: ( 1 ) *License term extension.* All parties to a partition and/or disaggregation Qualifying Transaction; the lessor entering into a spectrum lease arrangement Qualifying Transaction; and the assignee in a full license assignment Qualifying Transaction, shall receive a five-year license term extension on the license(s) subject to the application.
( 2 ) *Construction extension.* All parties to a partition and/or disaggregation Qualifying Transaction; the lessor entering into a spectrum lease arrangement Qualifying Transaction; and the assignee in a full license assignment Qualifying Transaction, shall receive a one-year construction extension of both the interim and final performance requirement deadline, where applicable, on the license(s) subject to the application. Where the Commission has previously extended a performance requirement deadline on the license(s) and that deadline has not passed, the one year extension conferred through ECIP is in addition to the prior extension, provided the extension that was previously granted, whether by rule or through waiver, is transferrable, and the assignee separately justifies such relief if required.
( 3 ) *Substitution of alternative construction requirement.* The assignee in a qualifying partition, combination partition disaggregation transaction, or full license assignment filed under the rural focused-transaction prong in § 1.60004, shall be subject to the alternative construction requirement set forth in § 1.60006 in lieu of any applicable service-based performance requirement for the license(s) resulting from an ECIP transaction. Where the Commission has previously modified the assignor's substantive service-based performance requirement through conditions granted by waiver and such requirements have not been met, the assignee will receive the substituted alternative construction requirement benefit if the assignee separately requests, and is granted, a waiver.
( b ) *Limitation on duplicative benefits.* ( 1 ) A license included in a Commission approved Qualifying Transaction in the ECIP shall be eligible for program benefits a single time per license for the license term and all subsequent renewal terms.
( 2 ) A license, including a license resulting from a partition and/or disaggregation, previously included in a Qualifying Transaction approved by the Commission in the ECIP, shall be ineligible to receive benefits in any subsequent ECIP transaction, regardless of whether the current licensee was the beneficiary in the original or a subsequent Qualifying Transaction.
[87 FR 57417, Sept. 20, 2022]
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Ecuity,  Inc., a Nevada  corporation
(the  "Company"),  on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ending  December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Leon M.
Caldwell,  Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ LEON M. CALDWELL
------------------------
Leon M. Caldwell
Secretary/Treasurer
February 23, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bank of Florida Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Tracy L. Keegan, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                            
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Tracy L. Keegan        
|                  |  |     |  | Tracy L. Keegan,           
|                  |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer
Skip to main content (Press Enter).

College of Information and Cyberspace National Defense University

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  About    -  Mission & Vision             
  -  Faculty & Staff             
  -  Fact Sheet             
  -  Alumni             
  -  Internships             
  -  FAQ 
-  Admissions    -  Eligibility Requirements             
  -  Admissions Calendar             
  -  Application Instructions             
  -  Apply Online             
  -  International Students 
-  Academics    -  Graduate Catalog             
  -  M.S. in Strategic Information and Cyberspace Studies      -  JPME Master's Degree             
    -  Cyber Workforce Master's Degree (Part Time) 
  -  Leadership Development Programs             
  -  Graduate Certificates             
  -  Academic Partners 
-  Current Students    -  JPME II  Incoming Students             
  -  LDP Incoming Students             
  -  Student Registration             
  -  Bring Your Own Device             
  -  IA Compliance             
  -  Completion Procedures / Order Transcripts             
  -  Student Services and Resources 
-  Events    -  Cyber Beacon             
  -  Cyber PME Colloquium             
  -  Hopper Award             
  -  Lecture Series             
  -  CYBERCOM Symposium 
-  NEWS		 
-  UC2    -  About             
  -  Events             
  -  Work With Us 
-  Center for Cybersecurity    -  About             
  -  Cybersecurity Center POC             
  -  Cybersecurity Supporting Faculty             
  -  CAE-CDE CISO Certificate Program             
  -  Cybersecurity Trending News             
  -  Cyber Labs      -  Ethical Hacking             
    -  Critical Infrastructure - SCADA 
  -  Cyber Exercises      -  Tabletop Exercise             
    -  Cyber Competitions 
  -  Cyber Resources and Awareness             
  -  Stakeholder / Industry Advisory Council 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Directions             
  -  Access to Ft. McNair             
  -  Map of Ft. McNair 

## College of Information and Cyberspace

300 Fifth Ave., Bldg. 62Fort Lesley J. McNairWashington, DC 20319-5066

202-685-6300

 

### Stay Connected

                              - DOD Privacy & Security
                              - DOD Links Disclaimer
                              - DOD Social Media Policy
                              - DOD Web Policy
                              - FOIA
                              - NDU System of Records Notice
                              - NDU Privacy & Security Notice
                              - No FEAR Act
                              - Open GOV
                              - Plain Writing Act
                              - Section 508
                              - Small Business Act
                              - USA.gov

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Amendment to Attachment to the Adoption Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.4.2 
 AMENDMENT TO ATTACHMENT TO 
 THE ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR 
 VBA EXECUTIVE’S DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 FOR C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
 (As Restated Effective January 1, 2001) 
 Pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors of C&F Financial Corporation, item 6 of the Attachment to the Adoption Agreement for the VBA
Executive’s Deferred Compensation Plan for C&F Financial Corporation, as restated effective January 1, 2001 and as thereafter amended, maintained in the form of the Virginia Bankers Association Model Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Plan for Executives and as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), is revised to read as follows, effective January 1, 2007: 
 6. Vesting in Employer Deferral Account SERP subaccount. 
  

	 	(a)	Except as otherwise provided in item 6(b) of this Attachment to the Adoption Agreement for the Plan, the Employer Deferral Account SERP subaccount of a Participant shall be fully
vested upon the first to occur of the following while he is an Employee: 

  

	 	(i)	His death. 

  

	 	(ii)	His total disability (based on the standard applicable under the Employer’s long term disability program or, if none or if he is not a participant in that program, based on his
entitlement to Social Security disability). 

  

	 	(iii)	His retirement at or after age 65. 

  

	 	(iv)	His early retirement with consent of the Board expressly providing for such vesting. 

  

	 	(v)	A Change in Control. 

  

	 	(b)	If other vesting provisions are provided by the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board with respect to the Employer Deferral Account SERP subaccount of any Participant no
later than the date the first contribution by the Employer to the Participant’s Employer Deferral Account SERP subaccount is made (or at any time thereafter if such other vesting provision make vesting more favorable to the Participant),
vesting in the Participant’s Employer Deferral Account SERP subaccount shall be determined as so provided by the Board or its Compensation Committee. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, C&F Financial Corporation, as the Plan Sponsor, has caused its name to be signed to this Attachment by its duly authorized officer as of the date noted below. 
  

									
	Dated:	 	March 7, 2007	 		 	C&F Financial Corporation, Plan Sponsor
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert L. Bryant

		 		 		 	Its Chief Operating Officer

 By execution hereof by the duly authorized Representative, the Virginia Bankers Association hereby
accepts the above Attachment. 
  

							
	Dated:	 	  
	 		 	  

		 		 		 	Trustee’s
Representative
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

This is to give notice, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2 section 10(a), that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Agricultural Advisory Committee will conduct a public meeting on July 19, 2000, in the first floor hearing room (Room 1000) of the Commission's Washington, DC headquarters, Three Lafayette Centre, 1151 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581. The meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. and last until 5 p.m. The agenda will consist of the following:

### Agenda

1. Welcoming Remarks

2. CFTC Regulatory Reinvention Proposal

3. Presentation by U.S. Exchange Representatives

4. Legislative Update

5. Recent Innovations in Agricultural Risk Management and Marketing

6. Other business

The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Advisory Committee, Commissioner David D. Spears, is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will, in his judgement, facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to file a written statement with the Advisory Committee should mail a copy of the statement to the attention of: The Agricultural Advisory Committee, c/o Commissioner David D. Spears, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581, before the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements should inform Commissioner Spears in writing at the foregoing address at least three business days before the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made, if time permits, for an oral presentation of no more than five minutes each in duration.

Issued by the Commission in Washington, DC on June 30, 2000.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-17132  Filed 7-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### L. M. Bryan and Dr. P. Phillips Company, a corporation, *Appellants,*vs. Gentile Bros. Company, a corporation, and Gregg Maxcy, Inc., a corporation, *Appellees.*

143 So. 760.

Division B.

Decision filed October 3, 1932.

*Leitner & Leitner*and W. *W. Whitehurst,*for Appel*lants;*

*Huff alter <Sb Bd/wards*and *Holland & Levis,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders overruling demurrers herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.