alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00668-CV

Rafael Montez da Oca, Appellant

v.

Eduardo Gutierrez, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-12-000782, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

This Court has been notified that appellant Rafael Montez da Oca has filed for

bankruptcy protection (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas, case number 15-10587).

Accordingly, the appeal is stayed. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; Tex. R. App. P. 8. Any party may file a

motion to reinstate upon the occurrence of an event that would allow the appeal to proceed. See Tex.

R. App. P. 8.3. Failure to notify this Court of a lift of the automatic stay or the conclusion of the

bankruptcy proceeding will result in the dismissal of the case for want of prosecution. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3(b).

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland

Bankruptcy

Filed: May 19, 2015
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

Exhibit 11.1 Statement regarding computation of per share earnings.

Presented below is the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the
computations for earnings per common share and earnings per common share -
diluted.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  1998
                                                 ------------------------------------
                                                   Income        Shares     Per Share
                                                 (Numerator)  (Denominator)   Amount
                                                 ------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>           <C>          <C>
Income available to common stockholder           $4,384,845     3,166,041
    Less unallocated ESOP shares                         --       117,894
                                                 ----------    ----------

Basic earnings per common share
    Income available to common stockholders       4,384,845     3,048,147   $   1.44

Effective of dilutive securities - options               --        84,684
                                                 ----------    ----------

Earnings per common share - assuming dilution
    Income available to common stockholders +
    assumed conversions                          $4,384,845    $3,132,831   $   1.40
                                                 ==========    ==========

                                                                  1997
                                                 ------------------------------------
                                                   Income        Shares     Per Share
                                                 (Numerator)  (Denominator)   Amount
                                                 ------------------------------------
Income available to common stockholder           $3,917,124     3,323,346
    Less unallocated ESOP shares                         --       139,077
                                                 ----------    ----------

Basic earnings per common share
    Income available to common stockholders       3,917,124     3,184,269   $   1.23

Effective of dilutive securities - options               --        56,800
                                                 ----------    ----------

Earnings per common share - assuming dilution
    Income available to common stockholders +
    assumed conversions                          $3,917,124    $3,241,069   $   1.21
                                                 ==========    ==========
</TABLE>

Basic earnings per common share information for 1996 is calculated by dividing
net income by the weighted number of shares outstanding (3,818,273). Earnings
per common share - assuming dilution for 1996 did not include the effect of
options to purchase 237,000 shares of common stock because the exercise price
was greater than the average market price of the common shares.
| 100 % Owned Subsidiaries                            | State/Country of Incorporation |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| PIA Merchandising Co , Inc.                         | California                     |
| PIA Merchandising Limited                           | Nova Scotia, Canada            |
| Pacific Indoor Display Co , Inc.                    | California                     |
| SPAR Acquisition, Inc.                              | Nevada                         |
| SPAR All Store Marketing Services, Inc.             | Nevada                         |
| SPAR Canada Company                                 | Nova Scotia, Canada            |
| SPAR Wings & Ink Company                        | Nova Scotia, Canada            |
| SPAR Canada, Inc.                                   | Nevada                         |
| SPAR Group International, Inc.                      | Nevada                         |
| SPAR Incentive Marketing, Inc.                      | Delaware                       |
| SPAR International LTD                              | Cayman Islands                 |
| SPAR Marketing, Inc. (f/k/a SPAR Acquisition, Inc.) | Delaware                       |
| SPAR Marketing Force, Inc.                          | Nevada                         |
| SPAR Trademarks, Inc.                               | Nevada                         |
| SPAR Merchandising Romania, Ltd.                    | Romania                        |
| SPAR China Ltd.                                     | China                          |
| SPAR FM Japan, Inc.                                 | Japan                          |
| SPAR Solutions Merchandising Private Limited        | India                          |
| SPAR Shanghai                                       | China                          |
| NMS Retail Services, ULC                            | Nova Scotia, Canada            |
| National Assembly Services, Inc.                    | New Jersey                     |
|   51% Owned International Subsidiaries   | Country                        |
| SGRP Meridian (Pty), Ltd.                           | South Africa                   |
| SPAR Turkey Ltd.                                    | Turkey                         |
| UAB SPAR RSS Baltic                                 | Lithuania                      |
| SPARFACTS Australia (Pty), Ltd.                     | Australia                      |
| S.C. SPAR City S.R.L.                               | Romania                        |
| SPAR (Shanghai) Marketing Management Company Ltd.   | China                          |
### Source: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text

idx?c=ecfr&sid=4a068ea9e8a458c82e7ca38e646d8bf5& rgn=div8& view=text& node=40:23.0.1.1.3.7.1.4 &i dno=40



# e **- CFR Data is current as of September 28, 2009** 
**Title 40: Protection of Environment** PART 152

— PESTICIDE REGISTRATION AND CLASSIFICATION PROCEDURES Subpart G

— Obligations and Rights of Registrants Browse Previous | Browse Next 

### § **152.132 Supplemental distribution.**  The registrant may distribute or sell his registered product under another person's name and address instead of (or in addition to) his own. Such distribution and sale is termed “supplemental distribution” and the product is referred to as a “distributor product.” The distributor is considered an agent of the registrant for all intents and purposes under the Act, and both the registrant and the distributor may be held liable for violations pertaining to the distributor product. Supplemental distribution is permitted upon notification to the Agency if all the following conditions are met: (a) The registrant has submitted to the Agency for each distributor product a statement signed by both the registrant and the distributor listing the names and addresses of the registrant and the distributor, the d istributor's company number, the additional brand name(s) to be used, and the registration number of the registered product. (b) The distributor product is produced, packaged and labeled in a registered establishment operated by the same producer (or under contract in accordance with §152.30) who produces, packages, and labels the registered product. (c) The distributor product is not repackaged (remains in the producer's unopened container). (d) The label of the distributor product is the same as that of t he registered product, except that: (1) The product name of the distributor product may be different (but may not be misleading); (2) The name and address of the distributor may appear instead of that of the registrant; (3) The registration number of the registered product must be followed by a dash, followed by the distributor's company number (obtainable from the Agency upon request); (4) The establishment number must be that of the final establishment at which the product was produced; and (5) Specific c laims may be deleted, provided that no other changes are necessary. (e) Voluntary cancellation of a product applies to the registered product and all distributor products distributed or sold under that registration number. The registrant is responsible for ensuring that distributors under his cancelled registration are notified and comply with the terms of the cancellation. [53 FR 15975, May 4, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 32096, June 19, 1995] Browse Previous | Browse NextFor questions or comments regarding e
- CFR editorial content, features, or design, email ecfr@nara.gov

. For questions concerning e
- CFR programming and delivery issues, email we bteam@gpo.gov

. Section 508 / Accessibility
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1253: LKQ CORPORATION v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GZM2sMUUdZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-20-2023-22-1253-lkq-corporation-v-gm-global-technology-operations-llc-opinion-22-1253-opinion-1-20-2023_2066551\/\">22-1253: LKQ CORPORATION v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-20-2023-22-1253-lkq-corporation-v-gm-global-technology-operations-llc-opinion-22-1253-opinion-1-20-2023_2066551\/embed\/#?secret=GZM2sMUUdZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1253: LKQ CORPORATION v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"GZM2sMUUdZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: LKQ CORPORATION v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1253 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Resources for Days of Service that Foster Bridging

Webinar, June 2023 

Greater Good Science Center at 

University of California Berkeley 

Bridging Differences Initiative 

The Bridging Differences Playbook

The Pluralism Project at 

Harvard University 

Interfaith Infrastructures (State by State) 

Center for Interfaith Cooperation 

Religious Diversity Workshops

The One America Movement 

Faith Over Division Program

The People’s Supper

Resource Library

 

Civic Health Project 

Bridge Builders Reading List 

Interfaith America 

Learn More about Team Up!

We Commemorate, We Commit Toolkit

Shared Values Facilitation Guide

Constructive Dialogue Institute 

Resource Library

10 Minute Conversation Simulator

Light Education Initiative 

Resource Links

Serve Ohio State Commission 

Service Speaks

Service Year Alliance 

Belonging Culture Roadmap 

Clearer Thinking 

Tools & Mini-Courses

Research Citations 

Vallone, D. et. al. “Two Stories of Distrust in America.” New York, NY: More in Common (May 2021). Available 

online at: https://www.moreincommon.com/our-work/publications/. 

Page, A. Scientists Warn of A “Friendship Recession” – I’m Part of It. A Different Page. Available on LinkedIn 

(February 2023). 

Center for Creative Leadership. Available online at: https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectivelyarticles/the-cost-of-conflictincompetence/#:~:text=Poor%20decision%2Dmaking.,poorer%20quality%20group%20decision%2Dmaking. 

(February 2023) 

Schleifer, D., Friedman, W., McNally, E. Putting Partisan Animosity in Perspective: A Hidden Common Ground 

Report. Brooklyn, NY: Public Agenda (November 2021). 

AmeriCorps Office of Research & Evaluation 

Dermanjian, S., Johnson, R. (2022). Bridging Differences through AmeriCorps Service: AmeriCorps Member Exit 

Survey Analysis 2016-2020. Washington, DC: AmeriCorps. Summary & Full Report Available online at: 

https://www.americorps.gov/sites/default/files/document/Bridging%20Differences_031623_final_508.pdf

Jennifer Leshnower, Bridging & Democracy Fellow | jleshnower@cns.gov
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135781 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. RACHEL SHAFFER, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 135781 

 COA: 275299 

Macomb CC: 04-002993-NH 

ST. JOSEPH’S MERCY HOSPITALS OF 

MACOMB and ST. JOSEPH’S MERCY OF 

MACOMB, a/k/a MERCY MOUNT CLEMENS 

CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

ST. JOSEPH MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM, 

a/k/a TRINITY HEALTH-MICHIGAN, PAUL 

MOCZARSKI, D.O., and MACOMB

EMERGENCY CARE PHYSICIANS, P.C., 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of Stone v Williamson (Docket No. 133986) is pending on appeal before this Court 

and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for 

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the 

decision in that case. 

d0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of LipidViro Tech, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I Kenneth P.
Hamik, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: 11/14/2006                          /s/Kenneth P. Hamik
      -----------                          --------------------------
                                           Kenneth P. Hamik
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
#### § 102-75.235 May disposal agencies transfer excess property to the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the Architect of the Capitol?

Yes, disposal agencies may transfer excess property to the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the Architect of the Capitol and any activities under his or her direction, pursuant to the provisions of 40 U.S.C. 113(d). The amount of reimbursement for such transfer must be the same as would be required for a transfer of excess property to an Executive agency under similar circumstances.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        1,721
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          510
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              3,764
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  19,439
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       36,539
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         35,375
<LOANS>                                      96,909
<ALLOWANCE>                                     395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              159,916
<DEPOSITS>                                  120,045
<SHORT-TERM>                                      0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             420
<LONG-TERM>                                  24,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        129
<OTHER-SE>                                   15,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              159,916
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               7,242
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             3,678
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                270
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             11,190
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            5,774
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            7,070
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         4,120
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               2,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,320
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      800
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    800
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .68
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 2.68
<LOANS-NON>                                     244
<LOANS-PAST>                                     14
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                345
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    72
<RECOVERIES>                                      2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               395
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            395
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than July 17, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Maria Villanueva, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                 

*1. Alan E. Knudson and the Knudson Family Limited Partnership, Ltd.,*                     Draper, Utah; to retain voting shares of Silver State Bancorp, Henderson, Nevada, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Silver State Bank, Henderson, Nevada.                 

      ( print page 41072)    
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 27, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-16733 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
004P16

#### State v. Jamonte Dion Baker

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court of Mecklenburg County

1. Dismissed

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

3. Dismissed as moot

Ervin, J.,

recused
ACCEPTED 12-14-00232-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 7/8/2015 1:46:09 PM CATHY LUSK CLERK