alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                                  CERTIFICATION

                  Chase Credit Card Master Trust (the "Trust")

I, Patricia M. Garvey, a vice president of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National
Association, the depositor of assets into the above-referenced Trust, certify
that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the
         Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, for inclusion in
         these reports is included in these reports;

4.       Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
         in this annual report and required to be delivered to the trustee in
         accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement and
         except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
         obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement; and

5.       These reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
         the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         pooling and servicing agreement that is included in this annual report.





Date:    March 30, 2004


         /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
-------------------------------------
Name:    Patricia M. Garvey
Title:   Vice President
Company: Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
125P16

#### State v. Mark Wayne Ballard

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Leave of the Court to File Notice of Appeal (COAP16-832)

1.

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal

2.

3. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Equitable Tolling

3.

4. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Stay

4. Dismissed 04/06/2016

6. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Appointment of Counsel

5.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"23-2123: WILDER v. MCDONOUGH [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"u0tjAPSdii\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-20-2023-23-2123-wilder-v-mcdonough-order-23-2123-order-11-20-2023_2224553\/\">23-2123: WILDER v. MCDONOUGH [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-20-2023-23-2123-wilder-v-mcdonough-order-23-2123-order-11-20-2023_2224553\/embed\/#?secret=u0tjAPSdii\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“23-2123: WILDER v. MCDONOUGH [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"u0tjAPSdii\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: WILDER v. MCDONOUGH [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 23-2123 Origin: CAVC Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 8, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-951 Lower Tribunal No. 06-390-K

________________ 

### Clifford Jason Gregory ,

Appellant,
vs. 

### Key West Welding and Fabrication, Inc., and Edward

Salvador Bazo , Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Timothy J. Koenig, Judge. Law Offices of Hugh Morgan and Hugh Morgan; W. Sam Holland; Wasson & Associates, Chartered, and Roy D. Wasson, for appellant. Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP, and Carol M. Rooney (Tampa), for appellees. Before LOGUE, HENDON, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-2257: ZHEJIANG MACHINERY IMPORT & EXPORT CORP. v. US [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yKKF9Iej19\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/04-14-2023-21-2257-zhejiang-machinery-import-export-corp-v-us-opinion-21-2257-opinion-4-14-2023_2111054\/\">21-2257: ZHEJIANG MACHINERY IMPORT & EXPORT CORP. v. US [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/04-14-2023-21-2257-zhejiang-machinery-import-export-corp-v-us-opinion-21-2257-opinion-4-14-2023_2111054\/embed\/#?secret=yKKF9Iej19\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-2257: ZHEJIANG MACHINERY IMPORT & EXPORT CORP. v. US [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"yKKF9Iej19\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: ZHEJIANG MACHINERY IMPORT & EXPORT CORP. v. US [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-2257 Origin: CIT Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with Bancshares of Florida, Inc.s (Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31September, 2005 (Report), I certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the period ended
March 31, 2005.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 3, 2005



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ DAVID G. WALLACE                    
|David G. Wallace Chief Financial Officer



36
§ 302-11.402 Who is not eligible to receive residence transaction expense allowances? The following are not eligible to receive residence transaction expense allowances: ( a ) New appointees; and
( b ) Employees assigned under the Government Employee's Training Act (5 U.S.C. 4109).
No. 11-1146.

#### Snelling *v.*Michelin North American, Inc., et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
037P16

#### Annabelle Umberger v. Pike Corporation, J. Eric Pike, Charles E. Bayless, James R. Helvey III, Peter Pace, Daniel J. Sullivan, James L. Turner, Court Square Capital Partners, Pioneer Parent, Inc., and Pioneer Merger Sub, Inc.

1. Defs (Pike Corporation) PDR Prior to a Determination of COA

1. Allowed 02/08/2016

2. Def’s (Pike Corporation) Motion to Consolidate Appeals

2. Allowed 02/08/2016
§ 301-75.102 What pre-employment interview travel expenses are not payable? You may not pay expenses for: ( a ) Use of communication services for purposes other than communication directly related to travel arrangement for the Government interview.
( b ) Hire of a room at a hotel or other place to transact official business.
AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION 10-Q


                                   EXHIBIT 99

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of American Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), the undersigned officers of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their
knowledge:

       (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

       (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




August 13, 2002                      BY:   Carl H. Lindner
-------------------------                  -----------------------------------
Date                                       Carl H. Lindner
                                           Chairman of the Board and
                                             Chief Executive Officer




August 13, 2002                      BY:   Fred J. Runk
-------------------------                  -----------------------------------
Date                                       Fred J. Runk
                                           Senior Vice President and Treasurer














                                       26
#### § 102-73.10 What is the basic real estate acquisition policy?

When seeking to acquire space, Federal agencies should first seek space in Government-owned and Government-leased buildings. If suitable Government-controlled space is unavailable, Federal agencies must acquire real estate and related services in an efficient and cost effective manner.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Scheduled Cases - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ilQwfULVLm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/oral-argument\/scheduled-cases\/\">Scheduled Cases<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/oral-argument\/scheduled-cases\/embed\/#?secret=ilQwfULVLm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Scheduled Cases” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"ilQwfULVLm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Schedules for upcoming court sessions are available below and will be updated as needed. Scheduled Cases – March 2024 (pdf) Scheduled Cases – April 2024 (pdf) March 2024 April 2024 March 2024 April 2024"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2021-1747: Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. US - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3PxPt2Zkf2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-08-2022-2021-1747-mid-continent-steel-wire-v-us-audio-uploaded\/\">2021-1747: Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. US<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-08-2022-2021-1747-mid-continent-steel-wire-v-us-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=3PxPt2Zkf2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2021-1747: Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. US” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"3PxPt2Zkf2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. US (mp3) Appeal Number: 2021-1747 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SAMSON WOUBETU , ) ) Plaintiff , ) )

v. ) Civil Action No. 2 3

- 094 5 (UNA) ) PAT HANDY LEGACY SHELTER, et al. , ) ) Defendan t s

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se c omplaint

. The Court grants the application and , f or the reasons discussed below, the dismisses the complaint

. A pro se litigant’s pleading is held to less stringent standards than would be applied to a formal pleading drafted by lawyer. See Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro

se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch , 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserte d, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense , and to

determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano , 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).2 Plaintiff, who currently resides at a homeless shelter, alleges that another resident stole his pants as well as the cash and keys in the pockets

. See Compl. at 1. He further alleges that shelter staff refused to help him with this incident and another incident where plaintiff’s Bible, books, jacket and paper s were stolen. See id

. Missing from the complaint is a statement establishing a basis for this Court’s jurisdiction . This defect, along with the complaint’s failure make a clear statement of claim and demand for relief, warrant dismissal of the complai nt for failure to comply with the minimum pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a)

. A separate order will issue.

/s/ TANYA S. CHUTKAN DATE: April 20, 2023 United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period March 31,
2006 (the "Report"), Joey Schwartz Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1). To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



DATE: MAY 12, 2006


/S/ JOEY SCHWARTZ
--------------------
JOEY SCHWARTZ
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 27.1136 Protection of mobile satellite services in the 2000-2020 MHz and 2180-2200 MHz bands.

An AWS licensee of the 2000-2020 MHz and 2180-2200 MHz bands must accept any interference received from duly authorized mobile satellite service operations in these bands. Any such AWS licensees must protect mobile satellite service operations in these bands from harmful interference.

[78 FR 8270, Jan. 5, 2013]
Exhibit 15.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-148460) pertaining to the 1999 Share Option Plan, 2000 Share Option Plan, Israel 2003 Share Option Plan and 2007 Share Incentive Plan of Lumenis Ltd. of our report dated April 6, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Lumenis Ltd. included in the annual report on Form 20-F of Lumenis Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2009.




/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kassierer

KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER

A Member of Ernst & Young Global




Tel Aviv, Israel


April 6, 2010
#### § 25.207 Cessation of emissions.

Space stations shall be made capable of ceasing radio emissions by the use of appropriate devices (battery life, timing devices, ground command, etc.) that will ensure definite cessation of emissions.