alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 22.817 Additional channel policies. The rules in this section govern the processing of applications for authority to operate a ground station transmitter on any ground station communication channel listed in § 22.805 when the applicant has applied or been granted an authorization for other ground station communication channels in the same area. The general policy of the FCC is to assign one ground station communication channel in an area to a carrier per application cycle, up to a maximum of six ground station communication channels per area. That is, a carrier must apply for one ground station communication channel, receive the authorization, construct the station, and notify the FCC of commencement of service before applying for an additional ground station communication channel in that area. ( a ) *Air-ground transmitters in same area.* Any transmitter on any of the ground station channels listed in § 22.805 is considered to be in the same area as another transmitter on any ground station channel listed in § 22.805 if it is located less than 350 kilometers (217 miles) from that transmitter.
( b ) *Initial channel.* The FCC will not assign more than one ground station communication channel for new ground stations. Ground stations are considered to be new if there are no authorized ground station transmitters on any channel listed in § 22.805 controlled by the applicant in the same area.
( c ) *Additional channel.* Applications for ground transmitters to be located in the same area as an authorized ground station controlled by the applicant, but to operate on a different ground station communication channel, are considered as requesting an additional channel for the authorized station.
( d ) *Amendment of pending application.* If the FCC receives and accepts for filing an application for a ground station transmitter to be located in the same area as a ground station transmitter proposed in a pending application previously filed by the applicant, but on a different ground station communication channel, the subsequent application is treated as a major amendment to change the technical proposal of the prior application. The filing date of any application so amended is the date the FCC received the subsequent application.
( e ) *Dismissal of premature applications for additional channel.* If the FCC receives an application requesting an additional ground station communication channel for an authorized ground station prior to receiving notification that the station is providing service to subscribers on the authorized channel(s), the FCC may dismiss that application without prejudice.
( f ) *Dismissal of applications for seventh channel.* If the FCC receives an application requesting an additional ground station communication channel for an authorized ground station which would, if granted, result in that station being assigned more than six ground station communication channels in the same area, the FCC may dismiss that application without prejudice.
#### Rafael A. RUIZGARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-5181.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 4, 2004.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
#### § 25.404 Submission of down payment and filing of long-form applications.

A high bidder that meets its down payment obligations in a timely manner must, within thirty (30) business days after being notified that it is a high bidder, submit an amendment to its pending application to provide the information required by § 25.144.

[67 FR 45373, July 9, 2002]
# Colonel Eberhardt Retirement Ceremony

/ Published April 12, 2022
12 April, 2022, 
Congratulation to Colonel Eberhardt on his retirement from the Air Force! The CIC family thanks you for your service to the College and wishes you the best of luck on your next adventures!
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.16 Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury in lieu of affidavits. Any document to be filed with the Federal Communications Commission and which is required by any law, rule or other regulation of the United States to be supported, evidenced, established or proved by a written sworn declaration, verification, certificate, statement, oath or affidavit by the person making the same, may be supported, evidenced, established or proved by the unsworn declaration, certification, verification, or statement in writing of such person, except that, such declaration shall not be used in connection with: (a) A deposition, (b) an oath of office, or (c) an oath required to be taken before a specified official other than a notary public. Such declaration shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form: ( 1 ) If executed without the United States: “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)”.
( 2 ) If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths:
“I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)”.
[48 FR 8074, Feb. 25, 1983]
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-1/January/P-13-0495/p130495.eng.txt[1/31/2014 11:26:07 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0495

Focus Ready Draft 7/11/2013

ENGINEER: Austin \ EV

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: Wacker Chemical Corporation

 

CRSS (06/24/2013):

S-H20: 0.001 g/L @

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @

MW: %<500 %<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 6
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-1/January/P-13-0495/p130495.eng.txt[1/31/2014 11:26:07 AM]

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 6
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-1/January/P-13-0495/p130495.eng.txt[1/31/2014 11:26:07 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0495

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 6
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-1/January/P-13-0495/p130495.eng.txt[1/31/2014 11:26:07 AM]

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 6
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-1/January/P-13-0495/p130495.eng.txt[1/31/2014 11:26:07 AM]

 

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0495

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 6
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-1/January/P-13-0495/p130495.eng.txt[1/31/2014 11:26:07 AM]

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

1. The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 24, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael A. Baker
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Michael A. Baker                  
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | President, Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before of after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### § 302.3 Who may apply.

(a) *Eligible recipient.* To apply for a CMC grant under this part, an applicant must be an eligible recipient in an anchor community as defined in § 302.2. NTIA will rely on the following sources of information to determine whether an applicant is an eligible recipient:

| Type | NTIA Validation method |
| --- | --- |
| Historically Black College or University (HBCU) | Most recent NCES list of HBCUs. |
| Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI) | Defined as eligible or potentially eligible in the most recent Dep't of Education Eligibility Matrix available, in the HSI category. |
| Tribal College or University (TCU) | Most recent NCES list of TCUs. |
| Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian (ANNH) | Defined as eligible or potentially eligible in the most recent Dep't of Education Eligibility Matrix available, in the ANNH or ANNH F categories. |
| Predominantly Black Institution (PBI) | Defined as eligible or potentially eligible in the most recent Dep't of Education Eligibility Matrix available, in the PBI F or PBI A categories. |
| Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-Serving Institution (AANAPISI) | Defined as eligible or potentially eligible in the most recent Dep't of Education Eligibility Matrix available, in the AANAPISI or AANAPISI F categories. |
| Native American-Serving Non-Tribal Institution (NASNTI) | Defined as eligible or potentially eligible in the most recent Dep't of Education Eligibility Matrix available, in the NASNTI or NASNTI F categories. |

Table 1 to Paragraph (a)

(b) *Eligibility for consortia members.* For consortium applications led by eligible recipients described in paragraph (a) of this section, NTIA will require that any Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) consortium member self-certify that it is a MBE-designated entity. For consortium members that claim tax-exempt status, NTIA will utilize the Internal Revenue Service's 501(c)(3) certification portal/database to verify the consortium member's tax-exempt status.
From: Battle, Darlene F CIV USARMY ASC 407 AFSB (US)

To: EAS (OST)

Cc: Brown, Joseph R (Joe) JR CIV USARMY ASC 407 AFSB (US); Housley, Leonard A CIV USARMY USAG (US);

Thomas, Chester D CIV USARMY 407 AFSB (US)

Subject: Response for Proposal for EAS provider (UNCLASSIFIED)

Date: Thursday, September 18, 2014 2:03:51 PM

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: FOUO

Good day and thank you for providing Ft Leonard Wood the opportunity to respond to the request

for an Essential Air Carrier to our community.

Upon reviewing the proposals from Cape Air and Air Choice One, Ft Leonard Wood has chosen to

recommend Cape Air to continue to provide service.

Air Choice One’s proposal was quite vague and their subsidy was more expensive than that of

Cape Air.

Cape Air has continued to maintain quality service and have increased ridership immensely. They

work closely with the Installation and with the community in attempts to meet the needs with what

they are able to provide. Their on-time and success rates far exceeds typical airline standards and

professes encouragement with confidence in meeting our traveling needs to and from the St Louis

Lambert Airport.

Thank you again for this opportunity and we look forward to hearing from you concerning the

outcome of the proposals.

Darlene F Battle

Installation Transportation Officer

380 First Street

Ft Leonard Wood, MO 65473

573-596-0617

DSN 581-0617

BB 573-842-7107

FAX 573-596-0725

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: FOUO
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.8



QUIDEL CORPORATION 
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD GRANT NOTICE
(2016 Equity Incentive Plan)
Pursuant to Section 6.11 of the Quidel Corporation 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), Quidel Corporation (the “Company”) hereby awards to you a Restricted Stock Unit Award covering the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock set forth below (the “Award”).  This Award will be evidenced by this Grant Notice and the attached Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms and Conditions  (the “Terms and Conditions”).
	
					
	Grantee:
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Date of Grant:
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Number of Shares Subject to Award:
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Beginning Fair Market Value per Share:
	 
	 
	 
	 



        
Vesting and Settlement:  Subject to the applicable tax withholding requirements, the Restricted Stock Units will vest and be delivered at the time set forth on Exhibit A.  


Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:  The undersigned acknowledges receipt of, and understands and agrees to, this Restricted Stock Unit Award Grant Notice, the Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms and Conditions, the Plan and the Plan Prospectus.  You further acknowledge that as of the Date of Grant, this Restricted Stock Unit Award Grant Notice, the Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms and Conditions, the Plan and the Plan Prospectus set forth the entire understanding between the Company and you regarding the acquisition of shares of Common Stock of the Company and supersede all prior oral and written agreements on that subject with the exception of Awards previously granted and delivered to you under the Plan.  You further acknowledge that there may be adverse tax consequences upon the vesting or settlement of the Restricted Stock Units or disposition of the underlying shares and that you have been advised to consult a tax advisor prior to such vesting, settlement or disposition.


	
				
	QUIDEL CORPORATION
	GRANTEE:
	 
	 




	
							
	By:
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Signature
	 
	Signature

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Title:
	 
	 
	 
	Date:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Date:
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 






		
	ATTACHMENTS: 
	Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms and Conditions and 2016 Equity Incentive Plan











Exhibit A









ATTACHMENT I
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT
AWARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS









ATTACHMENT II
2016 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1955: HARTMAN v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WLZT6GnDHc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-09-2022-22-1955-hartman-v-us-order-22-1955-order-11-9-2022_2031110\/\">22-1955: HARTMAN v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-09-2022-22-1955-hartman-v-us-order-22-1955-order-11-9-2022_2031110\/embed\/#?secret=WLZT6GnDHc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1955: HARTMAN v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"WLZT6GnDHc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: HARTMAN v. US [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1955 Origin: CFC Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
#### § 301-74.10 May we waive the requirement in § 301-74.9?

Yes, if the head of your agency makes a written determination on an individual case basis that waiver of the requirement to use approved accommodations is necessary in the public interest for a particular event. Your agency head may delegate this waiver authority to a senior agency official or employee who is given waiver authority with respect to all conferences sponsored or funded, in whole or in part, by your agency.

[FTR Amdt. 89, 65 FR 1327, Jan. 10, 2000. Redesignated and amended by FTR Amdt. 2013-01, 78 FR 65212, Oct. 31, 2013]
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of LipidViro Tech, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I
Kenneth P. Hamik, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: 11/14/2005                          /s/Kenneth P. Hamik
      -----------                          -------------------------------
                                           Kenneth P. Hamik
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Director
### SERVED: October 21, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF ALASKA AIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0287
NOTICE Ira Leibowitz, Attorney-Advisorretired on September 30, 2013. All future communications shouldbe directed to the undersigned at: Richard C. Goodwin, U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, Attn: Room E11-310 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 (Richard.Goodwin@dot.gov) Administrative matters should be directed to PatriciaMatthews, StaffAssistant (202) 366-5121 (Patricia.Matthews(W,dot.gov)

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List•'

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1 TEL: 202-385-8229 FAX: 202-493-5142 ONE COPY Joanna L. Simon, Respondent's Counsel Morrison & Foerster, LLP 12531 High BluffDrive San Diego, CA 92130-2040 TEL: 858-720-5100 FAX: 858.-720-5125 Email: JoannaSimon@mofo.com Bradley Tilde, President AlaskaAirlines, Inc., Respondent P.O. Box 68900 Seattle, Washington 96168 Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel FAA Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, Washington 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007 E-MAIL: robert.spitzer@faa.gov FDMS No. FAA-2013-0287 (Civil Penalty Action)

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

      ( print page 45598)    

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of members to the Financial Management Service (FMS) Performance Review Board (PRB).

# DATES:

This notice is effective on August 9, 2006.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Judith R. Tillman, Deputy Commissioner, Financial Management Service, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC; telephone (202) 874-7000.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice is given of the appointment of individuals to serve as members of the FMS PRB. This Board reviews the performance appraisals of career senior executives below the Assistant Commissioner level and makes recommendations regarding ratings, bonuses, and other personnel actions. Four voting members constitute a quorum. The names and titles of the FMS PRB members are as follows:

## Primary Members

Judith R. Tillman, Deputy Commissioner

Gary Grippo, Assistant Commissioner, Federal Finance

J. Martin Mills, Assistant Commissioner, Debt Management Services

Wanda Rogers, Assistant Commissioner, Financial Operations

Charles R. Simpson, Assistant Commissioner, Information Resources

D. James Sturgill, Assistant Commissioner, Governmentwide Accounting

## Alternate Member

Scott H. Johnson, Assistant Commissioner, Management (Chief Financial Officer)

Dated: August 4, 2006.

Judith R. Tillman,

Deputy Commissioner.

[FR Doc. 06-6798 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M