alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 11

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



     The Conversion was effective March 29, 1996.  Accordingly, earnings per
share data for the year ended September 30, 1996 is comprised of the earnings
for the post-Conversion period.  The weighted average number of shares
outstanding includes all shares issued and outstanding of 1,840,000 less 144,552
shares purchased by the ESOP at the time of the Conversion plus the pro-rata
portion of shares committed to be released through September 30, 1996.

 
 
Net income for the period from March 29, 1996 to September 30, 1996   $  419,827
 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding                         $1,695,448
 
Earnings per share                                                    $     0.25
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1160 Refunds of regulatory fees. ( a ) Regulatory fees will be refunded, upon request, only in the following instances: ( 1 ) When no regulatory fee is required or an excessive fee has been paid. In the case of an overpayment, the refund amount will be based on the applicants', permittees', or licensees' entire submission. All refunds will be issued to the payor named in the appropriate block of the FCC Form 159. Payments in excess of a regulatory fee will be refunded only if the overpayment is $10.00 or more.
( 2 ) In the case of advance payment of regulatory fees, subject to § 1.1152, a refund will be issued based on unexpired full years: ( i ) When the Commission adopts new rules that nullify a license or other authorization, or a new law or treaty renders a license or other authorization useless;
( ii ) When a licensee in the wireless radio service surrenders the license or other authorization subject to a fee payment to the Commission; or
( iii ) When the Commission declines to grant an application submitted with a regulatory fee payment.
( 3 ) When a waiver is granted in accordance with § 1.1166.
( b ) No pro-rata refund of an annual fee will be issued.
( c ) No refunds will be issued based on unexpired partial years.
( d ) No refunds will be processed without a written request from the applicant, permittee, licensee or agent.
[60 FR 34032, June 29, 1995, as amended at 67 FR 46307, July 12, 2002]
### FILED August 25, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE JUNE 1999 SESSION

THOMAS COOK * C.C.A. # 03C01-9808-C R-00281

Appellant, * HAMILTON COUNTY VS. * Honorable Douglas A. Meyer, Judge STATE OF TENNESSEE, * (PostConviction/Possessi on of Cocaine For Resale) Appellee. *

FOR THE APPELLANT : FOR THE APPELLEE : THOMAS COOK PAUL G. SUMME RS Pro Se Attorney General & Reporter P.O. Box PMB Atlanta, GA 30315 ERIK W. DAAB Assistant Attorney General 425 Fifth Avenue North Nashville, TN 37 243

OPINION FILED: _______________1 This record is vo id of any judgm ent or plea agreem ent. -2- AFFIRMED - RULE 20

JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, Judge



### OPINI ON The petitioner, T homas Cook, alleges t hat on January 8, 1993, he pled guilty to attempt to poss ess cocaine for resal e and received an eight-ye ar sentence. 1 On December 18, 1998, the petitioner filed a petition for post -conviction relie f. The trial court dismissed t he petition as tim e barred, and it isfrom that decision that the pet itioner now appeals . We AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court.
Pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 40-30-202(a), a petitioner must p etition for post- conviction relief within one year of the date of the final action of the highest state appellate court to which an appeal was taken. A court does not have jurisdict ion to consider a petit ion for post-convic tion relief if i t is outside of the one-year statute of limitations unless:-3- (1) The claim in the petition is based upon a final ruling of an appellate court establishi ng a constitutional r ight that was not recognized as existing at the time of the trial, if retrospective application of that right is required . . . ; (2) The claim in the petition is based upon new scientific evidence establishing that such petitioner is actually innocent of the offense or offenses for which the petitioner was convicted; or (3) The claim asserted in the petition seeks relief from a sentence that was enhanced because of a previous conviction and such conviction in the case in which the claim is asserted was not a guilty plea with an agreed sentence, and t he previous convicti on has subsequently been held to be invalid . . . . Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30- 202(b).
The petitioner has filed his petiti on for post-convict ion relief outside of the stat ute of limitati ons set forth in T ennessee Code Annotated § 40-30-202(a), and he does not submit that any of his claims fall within one of the exceptions set forth above. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules.

________________________________ JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, Judge-4- CONCUR:

_____________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, Judge

_____________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4456 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4456

To amend title 10, United States Code, to give a priority to the States 
  for the transfer of nonlethal excess supplies of the Department of 
                                Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1994

Mr. Jefferson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to give a priority to the States 
  for the transfer of nonlethal excess supplies of the Department of 
                                Defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIORITY TO STATES FOR THE TRANSFER OF NONLETHAL EXCESS 
              SUPPLIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    Section 2547 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking out ``The Secretary of 
        Defense'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``Subject to subsection 
        (d), the Secretary of Defense'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new 
        subsection (d):
    ``(d) Nonlethal excess supplies of the Department of Defense shall 
be made available to a State, a local government of a State, a 
Territory, or a possession, upon the request of the State, local 
government, Territory, or possession pursuant to authority provided in 
another provision of law, before such supplies are made available for 
humanitarian relief purposes under this section. The President may make 
such supplies available for humanitarian purposes before such supplies 
are made available to a State, local government, Territory, or 
possession under this subsection in order to respond to an emergency 
for which such supplies are especially suited.''.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

Exhibit 21.1      Subsidiaries of Registrant.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             State of
           Subsidiary                     Incorporation         Percentage Owned
<S>                                            <C>          <C>
First Financial Service Corporation            Iowa         Wholly owned by the Bank

First Iowa Title Services, Inc.                Iowa         Wholly owned by the Bank

Northridge Apartments Limited Partnership      Iowa         99% owned by the Bank

First Iowa Mortgage, Inc.                      Iowa         Wholly owned by the Bank

First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa             Federal      Wholly owned by the Registrant
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001082562
<NAME> SOFTWALL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,374
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,374
<PP&E>                                          17,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,798
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,467
<OTHER-SE>                                    (78,387)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,878
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,472)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,472)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,472)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SHIBUMI SHADE, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BEACH SHADE LLC, MATTHEW FINNERAN, 

Defendants-Appellants

______________________

2023-1051

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of North Carolina in No. 5:21-cv-00256-

FL, Judge Louise Wood Flanagan.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

The parties submit a “Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal,” which the court treats as a joint motion 

to dismiss these appeals.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Case: 23-1051 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 12/14/2022
2 SHIBUMI SHADE, INC. V. BEACH SHADE LLC

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

December 14, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 14, 2022

Case: 23-1051 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 12/14/2022
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Filer Guidance Concerning 2019 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ePS87IlX81\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/filer-guidance-concerning-2019-amendments-to-the-federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure\/\">Filer Guidance Concerning 2019 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/filer-guidance-concerning-2019-amendments-to-the-federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure\/embed\/#?secret=ePS87IlX81\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Filer Guidance Concerning 2019 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"ePS87IlX81\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"On December 2, 2019, the court will issue an updated version of the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice incorporating any adopted amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.\u00a0 Filers are advised that to the extent that the December 2019 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure amendments eliminate the proof of service requirement for electronic filing, […]"}
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of LipidViro Tech, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I Kenneth P.
Hamik, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: 8/21/2006                           /s/Kenneth P. Hamik
      -----------                          --------------------------
                                           Kenneth P. Hamik
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 00-15702) published on page 38832 of the issue for Thursday, June 22, 2000. 

Under the entry for Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies, is revised to read as follows: 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 104 Marietta Street, NW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:                 

*1. Cumberland Bancshares, Inc.,*                     Hartsville, Tennessee; to acquire 51 percent of the voting shares of Academy Bank (in organization), Lebanon, Tennessee.                 

**B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Phillip Jackson, Applications Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                 

*1. Amana Bancshares, Inc.,*                     Southfield, Michigan; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Amana Bank (in organization), Dearborn, Michigan.                 

Comments on this application must be received by July 17, 2000. 

The correct date this Notice was signed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, is June 16, 2000. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 28, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-16832 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Rules of Practice Amendments 2023 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"orgC5R5y5n\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/rules-procedures-forms\/rules-of-practice-amendments\/rules-of-practice-amendments-2023\/\">Rules of Practice Amendments 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/rules-procedures-forms\/rules-of-practice-amendments\/rules-of-practice-amendments-2023\/embed\/#?secret=orgC5R5y5n\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Rules of Practice Amendments 2023” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"orgC5R5y5n\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Amendment Notices Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2071(b) and Federal Circuit Rule 47(a), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has adopted amendments to Federal Circuit Rules of Practice 25, 26, 27, 28, 28.1, 30, 31, 32, 33, 33.1, 34, 35, 39, 40, 41, 47.4, 47.5, and 47.6. The proposed amendments were […]"}
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 07/08/08

CASE NUMBER: S08-0006

RELATED CASES:

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 1-2 1

KEYWORDS: LUNG OVERLOAD

MUTA

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT

FATE: Solid with MP = 1347 Ε C (M) S < 0.1 mg/L at 25 Ε C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 Ε C (E)

BP > 400 Ε C (E)

H < 1.00E- 8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via so rption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B1T1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

HEALTH: Not absorbed through the skin; poor absorption from the lung and GI tract (analog).

Co ncern for lung toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for poorly soluble particles rat inhalation NOAEL = 10 mg/m 3 , signs of lung overload at 50 mg/m 3 ) and mutagenicity

based on titanium oxide.

*CEB HEALTH: Low moderate concern (Inhalation)

Test data: single intratracheal instillation, observation for up to 6 months: clearance half

life = 2.2 mo

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are:

fish 96-h LC50 = * P daphnid 48-h LC50 = * P green algal 96 -h EC50 = * P

fish chronic value = * Pdaphnid ChV = * P algal ChV = * P Predictions are based on SARs for Ti oxides; SAR chemical class = Ti oxide; solid with mp = 1347 C: S < 1 g/L at 20 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; low concern for toxicity;

assessment factor = 10.0

concern concentration = *

*CEB ECOTOX : No releases to water

SAT Co

- chair: Leonard Keifer 564-8916
#### § 51-10.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.