alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Notice of Fee Schedule Change - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dZUGmf18Ry\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-fee-schedule-change-2\/\">Notice of Fee Schedule Change<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-fee-schedule-change-2\/embed\/#?secret=dZUGmf18Ry\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Fee Schedule Change” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"dZUGmf18Ry\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1914(b), the Judicial Conference of the United States has approved the below inflationary increases to various miscellaneous court fees, and the Federal Circuit has approved additional increases to its local fees, effective December 1, 2023. An updated fee schedule will be available on our website as of that date. Attorney […]"}
[Civ. No. 2154.

First Appellate District.

April 13, 1918.]

#### CUDAHY PACKING COMPANY, Appellant, v. R. ROSENBERG & SONS CO., Respondent.

Corporation Law—Guaranty op Account op Customer—Authority op General Manager.—Judgment reversed on the authority of *Armour*¡J- *Co.*v. E. *Rosenberg Sr Sons*Co., *ante,*p.' 773.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge.

The questions involved are similar to those presented in *Armour <& Co.*v. *Ii. Rosenberg & Sons Co., ante,*p. 773.

*819Ornbaun & Fraser, *for*Appellant.

Louis H. Brownstone, for Respondent.

KERRIGAN, J.

The questions involved in this appeal are in all respects similar to those presented in *Armour & Co.*v. *R. Rosenberg & Sons Co.*(No. 2104), *ante,*p. 773, [173 Pac. 404], and upon the authority of that ease the judgment is reversed.

Zook, J., *pro tern.,*and Beasly, J., *pro tern.,*concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on May 13, 1918, and a petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 10, 1918.
Order filed June 19, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 00854

- CV

____________ TIFFANY DIGGS , Appellant

V. RANDOLPH DIGGS, JR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 81634



### O R D E R
Appellant = s brief was due May 30, 2012

. No brief or motion for extension of time has been filed.
Unless appellant submits a brief to the clerk of this court on or before July 19, 2012 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
nvr-ex1035_9.htm



 

Exhibit 10.35 

NVR, Inc. 

Summary of the 2017 Named Executive Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan 

The following is a description of NVR, Inc.’s (“NVR” or the “Company”) 2017 annual incentive compensation plan (the “Bonus Plan”). The Bonus Plan is not set forth in a formal written document, and therefore NVR is providing this description of the plan pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii) of Regulation S-K. All of NVR’s named executive officers; Paul C. Saville (President and Chief Executive Officer of NVR), Jeffrey D. Martchek (President of Homebuilding Operations), Daniel D. Malzahn (Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of NVR), Eugene J. Bredow (Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of NVR) and Robert W. Henley (President of NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc.), participate in the Bonus Plan. 

Under the Bonus Plan, the named executive officers’ bonus opportunity is limited to 100% of their base salary. The named executive officers’ annual bonus opportunity will be based 80% upon the Company’s consolidated pre-tax profit (before consolidated annual bonus and stock-based compensation expense but after all other charges) and 20% based on the number of new orders, net of cancellations (“New Orders”) compared to the consolidated pre-tax profit and New Orders within the Company’s 2017 annual business plan. The named executive officers begin to earn the consolidated pre-tax profit portion of their annual bonus award once the annual business plan is at least 80% attained. The full amount of the consolidated pre-tax profit portion of their annual bonus award is earned ratably from 80% up to 100% achievement of the annual business plan. The named executive officers begin to earn the New Orders portion of their annual bonus award once the annual business plan is at least 85% attained. The full amount of the New Orders portion of their annual bonus award is earned ratably from 85% up to 100% achievement of the annual business plan. Mr. Martchek’s bonus and Mr. Henley’s bonus are subject to a pro-rata reduction, limited to a maximum of 20% of earned bonus, based on the internal audit results of the operations under their direct management.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16422]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP00-393-000]

Wyoming Interstate Company, LTD.; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

June 23, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 20, 2000, Wyoming Interstate Company, LTD. 
(WIC), Post Office box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944, filed a 
request with the Commission in Docket No. CP00-393-000, pursuant to 
section 157.205, 157.211 and/or 157.216(b) of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to 
construct a new meter station for delivery of gas to Coastal Chem, Inc. 
authorized in blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-22-000, all 
as more fully set forth in the request on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).
    WIC states that Coastal Chem, Inc. a manufacturer of nitrogen based 
fertilizer to provide fuel gas for their processing facility in Laramie 
County, Wyoming. The proposed WIC delivery facility would consist of an 
eight-inch meter run with four-inch flow control valve and appurtenant 
facilities at an estimated cost of $240,000 plus tax gross up. Coastal 
Chem, Inc. would pay for the facility. The Coastal Chem, Inc. 
manufacturing facility is currently served by Cheyenne Light, Fuel and 
Power Company, a local distribution company.
    Any person for the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16422 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
**EXHIBIT 31(a)**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT**

**        TO RULE 13a-14 OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, George Solymar, chief executive officer of Hendrx Corp. (“Registrant”) certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Registrant; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: November 10, 2006 

/s/ George Solymar

George Solymar

Chief Executive Officer 

**37**

----
#### Christopher Betz, appellee, v. Albion P. Martin et al., appellants, Impleaded with Jesse P. Chipman.

Filed June 18, 1895.

No. 5811.

Beview: Failure to File Briefs: Affirmance. A cause which is submitted without oral argument being made or briefs filed will ordinarily be affirmed without examination of the record. *Miller v. Lewis,*41 Neb., 692, followed.

Appeal from the district court of Lancaster county. Heard below before Field, J.

*William B. Price,*for appellants.

*A. G. Greenlee, contra.*

Harrison, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of foreclosure of real estate mortgages rendered in the district court of Lancaster county May, 1892, and was submitted to this court upon the record- and bill of exceptions, without either oral argument or briefs filed calling attention to any alleged error or errors claimed to have been committed by the trial court. Under such circumstances it is the established rule of this court that, ordinarily, the judgment will be affirmed without an examination of the record. *(Stabler v. Gund,*35 Neb., 648; *Zimmerman Mfg. Co. v. Tower,*40 Neb., 306; *Miller v. Lewis,*41 Neb., 692.) The decree of the district court is

Affirmed.
#### § 22.305 Operator and maintenance requirements.

FCC operator permits and licenses are not required to operate, repair or maintain equipment authorized in the Public Mobile Services. Station licensees are responsible for the proper operation and maintenance of their stations, and for compliance with FCC rules.
#### § 51-2.5 Committee decision.

The Committee considers the particular facts and circumstances in each case in determining if a commodity or service is suitable for addition to the Procurement List. When the Committee determines that a proposed addition is likely to have a severe adverse impact on a current contractor, it takes this fact into consideration in deciding not to add the commodity or service to the Procurement List, or to add only a portion of the Government requirement for the item. If the Committee decides to add a commodity or service in whole or in part to the Procurement List, that decision is announced in the Federal Register with a notice that includes information on the effective date of the addition.

[59 FR 59342, Nov. 16, 1994]
Exhibit 23.3

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the        Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-07377) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plans,        in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-53400) pertaining to the Special Purpose Stock        Option Plan, inRegistration Statement Form S-8 (N0. 333-73000)        pertaining to the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in Registration Statement Form S-8        (No. 333-73002) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Option Plan and in registration Statement Form        S-8 (No 333-72998) pertaining to the 2001 Consultant Stock Purchase Plan of SPAR Group,        Inc. and with Respect to the December 31, 2006 consolidated financial statements of SPAR        Group, Inc included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K), for the year ended December 31, 2007        of our report dated March 15, 2008 with respect to the financial statements of SPAR        Merchandising Romania SRL, as of December 31, 2007 and for the year ended December 31,        2007.

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Baker Tilly Klitou and Partners S.R.L.

Bucharest, Romania        March 15, 2008

 

 

Ex-3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Adoption of Procedures for the Filing, Service, and Management of Highly Sensitive Documents - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ROcM6NKj1w\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/adoption-of-procedures-for-the-filing-service-and-management-of-highly-sensitive-documents\/\">Adoption of Procedures for the Filing, Service, and Management of Highly Sensitive Documents<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/adoption-of-procedures-for-the-filing-service-and-management-of-highly-sensitive-documents\/embed\/#?secret=ROcM6NKj1w\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Adoption of Procedures for the Filing, Service, and Management of Highly Sensitive Documents” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"ROcM6NKj1w\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"In response to recent disclosures of widespread breaches of both private sector and government computer systems, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has adopted new procedures for the handling of highly sensitive documents outside of the court\u2019s electronic case filing system (CM\/ECF) as well as for documents already electronically filed in […]"}
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

TAFOYA L. SUTTON, 

Petitioner

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

Respondent

______________________

2022-2231

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DC-0841-22-0513-I-1.

______________________

O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee 

required by Federal Circuit Rule 52 (a) (1) and to file the

required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is 

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the 

same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

December 1, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 1, 2022

Case: 22-2231 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 12/01/2022
Exhibit
 32



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q ofHendrx Corp.
 for the quarterly period endedSeptember
 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
 Commission on the date hereof, I,George Solymar,do
 hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
 best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the small business issuer
 for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:November
 19, 2008



/s/
 George Solymar

George
 Solymar

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small
 business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
 amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement
 required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer
 and will be retained by the small business issuer
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



42
Exhibit 23.1

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form S-8 (No.        333-07377) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plans, in the Registration Statement Form        S-8 (No. 333-53400) pertaining to the Special Purpose Stock Option Plan, in Registration        Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-73000) pertaining to the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in        Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-73002) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Option Plan        and in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-72998) pertaining to the 2001 Consultant        Stock Purchase Plan of SPAR Group, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2008, with respect to        the December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 consolidated financial statements and schedule of        SPAR Group, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year        ended December 31, 2007.

 

|   | /s/ Rehmann Robson |
|--------|--------------------|

 

Troy,        Michigan

March 30,        2008

 

 

Ex-1

 

----