alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

s1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

139490

DIANE RIEMERSMA-STOREY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139490 COA: 291490 Kent CC: 83-048746-DM RODGER WAYNE RIEMERSMA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 21, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4589 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4589

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional provision for the 
 reduction of work-related vehicle trips and miles travelled in ozone 
   nonattainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 1994

  Mr. Manzullo (for himself, Mr. Hastert, Mr. Crane, Mr. Fawell, Mr. 
Hyde, Mr. Sangmeister, Mr. Ewing, Mr. Fields of Texas, Mr. Archer, Mr. 
 Walker, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. 
  Hunter, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. 
    Hoekstra, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Saxton, and Mr. Gallo) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional provision for the 
 reduction of work-related vehicle trips and miles travelled in ozone 
   nonattainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPTIONAL EMPLOYER MANDATED TRIP REDUCTION.

    Section 182(d)(1)(b) of the Clean Air Act is amended by to read as 
follows:
            ``(B) The State may also, in its discretion, submit a 
        revision at any time requiring employers in such area to 
        implement programs to reduce work-related vehicle trips and 
        miles traveled by employees. Such revision shall be developed 
        in accordance with guidance issued by the Administrator 
        pursuant to section 108(f) and may require that employers in 
        such area increase average passenger occupancy per vehicle in 
        commuting trips between home and the workplace during peak 
        travel periods. The guidance of the Administrator may specify 
        average vehicle occupancy rates which vary for locations within 
        a nonattainment area (suburban, center city, business district) 
        or among nonattainment areas reflecting existing occupancy 
        rates and the availability of high occupancy modes. The 
        revision may require employers subject to a vehicle occupancy 
        requirement to submit a compliance plan to demonstrate 
        compliance with the requirements of this paragraph.''.

                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5479.

#### Jiles *v.*Davis, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Exhibit 31.2



Rule 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATION



I, Harry V. Maccarrone, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of COMFORCE Corporation, hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 4, 2005



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Harry V. Maccarrone                             
|Harry V. Maccarrone                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





24
Exhibit
32(b)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian X.
Tierney, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Brian X.
Tierney


Brian X.
Tierney


Chief
Financial Officer








October
30, 2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1926 Scope. ( a ) *Coverage.* This section applies to the Commission and employees as defined by § 1.1901.
( b ) *Applicability.* This section and 5 U.S.C. 5514 apply in recovering certain debts by offset, except where the employee consents to the recovery, from the current pay account of that employee. Because it is an administrative offset, debt collection procedures for salary offset which are not specified in 5 U.S.C. 5514 and these regulations should be consistent with the provisions of the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR parts 900-904). ( 1 ) *Excluded debts or claims.* The procedures contained in this section do not apply to debts or claims arising under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.*), the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*) or the tariff laws of the United States, or to any case where collection of a debt by salary offset is explicitly provided for or prohibited by another statute (e.g., travel advances in 5 U.S.C. 5705 and employee training expenses in 5 U.S.C. 4108).
( 2 ) Section 1.1926 does not preclude an employee from requesting waiver of an erroneous payment under 5 U.S.C. 5584, 10 U.S.C. 2774, or 32 U.S.C. 716, or in any way questioning the amount or validity of a debt, in the manner prescribed by the Commissioner. Similarly, this subpart does not preclude an employee from requesting waiver of the collection of a debt under any other applicable statutory authority.
( c ) *Time limit.* Under 31 CFR 901.3(a)(4) offset may not be initiated more than 10 years after the Government's right to collect the debt first accrued, unless an exception applies as stated in section 901.3(a)(4).
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

W E S T A V E

V IC T O R IA L N

C E N T R A L A V E

NEW JERSEY

NEW JERSEY

A T L A N T I C O C E A N

ATLANTIC

OCEAN

A T L A N T I C O C E A N

OCEAN CITY

Peck Beach

Atlantic

City

Sea Isle

City OE E

Avalon

Sea Isle

City

Marmora Ocean

City

5

000m

5 36

43

39

32

07' 07'

43

33

36

40

43

5 5 33

33

43

34

36

37 5

43

30"

43

30"

30"

39

30"

42

43

5 40 30" 33

43

38

5

35

39°

30"

10' 10'

32

42

5

000m

43

000m

31

41

43

FEET

43

43

FEET

37

41

30"

5

41 5 38

38

43

5

5

37'

43

37'

34

32'

43

35

43

5

43

5

38

39 5

N

35'

41

43 74°

43

35' 74°

31

43

42

35

74° 5

39°15' 15'

43

N

35

74°

5

12' 12'

34

43

5 30"

32'

30'

43

42

39

43

000

5

37

43

E

43

490 000

460

39°

43

30'

34 37

44

43

5

39°

44

000

43

FEET

150

000

000m

110

E

FEET

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

NEW

JERSEY

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

SEA ISLE CITY OE E, NJ

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

SEA ISLE CITY OE E QUADRANGLE

NEW JERSEY-CAPE MAY CO.

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10

of the USGS US Topo Product Standard.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.15.NJ

CONTOURS NOT PRESENT BECAUSE AVAILABLE ELEVATION

DATA DO NOT MEET ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Imagery...........................State of New Jersey, January 2007

Other imagery provided by DE, NY, PA

Roads...............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2010

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2007

Contours..........................................................Not Available

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 18S

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: New Jersey Coordinate System of 1983

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

WJ

18S

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 17 ́

5 MILS

12° 22 ́

220 MILS
# Jonathan Beasley

### Associate Professor of Practice

### 

### 

Areas of interest:

Disruptive Technology; National Security Strategy; Roman Republic

Jonathan (Jon) R. Beasley is an Associate Professor of Practice at the College of Information and Cyberspace inside the National Defense University. He is a retired Army Infantry Officer with over 30 years of active-duty experience. Mr. Beasley previously served as military faculty inside the college as its Dean of Students and an Associate Dean of Faculty and Academics from 2019 through 2023. He has also served as a Professor of Military Science and Department Chair at the University of Toledo from 2009 through 2012. Relevant service on active duty included Headquarters Department of the Army staff, the Joint Improvised-Threat Defeat Organization, United States Army Pacific, Combined Security Training and Assistance Command-Afghanistan, Joint Security Area-Panmunjom, Observer/ Controller at the Joint Readiness Training Center, and multiple command and staff positions inside Combat Arms Brigades and Battalions. Mr. Beasley was deployed numerous times, in support of Operation Desert Shield/ Storm, Kosovo, Iraq and three times to Afghanistan.

 

Mr. Beasley holds a Bachelor of Science from the University of Toledo, Master of Science from the Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy and a Master of Arts Louisiana State University.
§ 213.4 Definitions. As used herein: ( a ) Public correspondence services means those services offered to the general public for communications between all points served by a carrier or by interconnected carriers on a nonexclusive message by message or call by call basis, as differentiated from leased private line services.
( b ) The term *precedence* means the order in which messages and calls are processed. Transmission of information and call completion is therefore to be accomplished in the order required by the precedence designator. Any such properly categorized communications precede noncategorized communications.
( c ) The term *Government* where used alone means Federal, foreign, State, county, or municipal government agencies. Specific reference will be made whenever it is intended to apply to less than the whole, e.g., *State Government, Federal Government,* etc.
( d ) The term *Foreign Government* includes those foreign diplomatic and consular establishments and those coalitions or associations of governments such as NATO, SEATO, OAS, UN, and associations of governments or governmental agencies such as Pan American Union, International Postal Union, International Monetary Fund, and similar organizations.
( e ) The term *message* means a written or other form of record communication prepared for transmission and delivery at the destination.
( f ) The term *call* means a request from a user for a connection to another station whether for telephone or record communication.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Public Access for Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ke6mi55D5q\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/public-access-for-arguments\/\">Public Access for Arguments<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/public-access-for-arguments\/embed\/#?secret=Ke6mi55D5q\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Public Access for Arguments” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Ke6mi55D5q\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Given the extraordinary public health emergencies in the National Capital Region and the resulting restrictions on public access to the courthouse, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is providing media and public access to the audio stream of each panel scheduled for argument during the court’s monthly sessions.  The below streaming audio [...]"}
107P16

#### State v. Soyer Lewis Moll

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court, Onslow County

1. Dismissed

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

2. Dismissed as moot

Ervin, J.,

recused
No. 11-5197.

#### Torres-Palos *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 32.2431 Aerial wire. ( a ) This account shall include the original cost of bare line wire and other material used in the construction of such plant.
( b ) The cost of permits and privileges for the construction of cable and wire facilities shall be included in the account chargeable with such construction.
( c ) The cost of drop and block wires served by aerial wire shall be included in Account 2421, Aerial Cable.
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.3.1
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
 1993 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
          The Trinity Industries, Inc. 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), is hereby amended by this Amendment No. 1, effective as of June 9, 1994, as set forth below.
          Any term which is not defined below shall have the meaning set forth for such term in the Plan.
          1. Section 9(c) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:
     (c) If the Optionee ceases to be an officer, director, or employee of the Company or any Affiliate by reason of the Optionee’s retirement, all rights of the Optionee to exercise an option shall terminate, lapse, and be forfeited (i) in the case of an Incentive Stock Option, three (3) months after the date of the Optionee’s retirement and (ii) in the case of a Non-Qualified Stock Option, thirty-six (36)months after the date of the Optionee’s retirement; provided however, if the Optionee shall die during the applicable period provided under clause (i) or (ii), the personal representatives, heirs, legatees, or distributees of the Optionee, as appropriate, shall have the right up to twelve (12) months from the date of death to exercise any such option to the extent that the option was exercisable prior to death and had not been so exercised.
          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company as of the day and year first above written,
	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:
	 
	/s/ W. Ray Wallace
No. 11-5238.

#### Mora *v.*Brown, Superintendent, Eastern New York Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
BRAD CLAWSON

4054 W Aquarius Cir

Kearns, UT 84118

Pursuant to Section333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act ("FMRA") and 14 C.F.R. part

11, Noswalc Studios hereby petitions the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") for exemption

from 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a),

91.119(c), 91.121, 91.15l(a)(l), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(l) and (2), and 91.417(a) and

(b), and any other rules the FAA deems necessary, to enable Noswalc Studios to operate

unmanned aircraft systems ("UAS") for aerial photography & videography. Specifically, Noswalc

Studios seeks to operate UAS for aerial photography & videography which includes real estate,

land surveying, and recreational events using the Blade 350 QX3 and BJC 4. Because this

petition is similar in all material respects to previously­granted Section 333 petitions, Noswalc

Studios requests expedited approval pursuant to the FAA's summary grant process.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-24270-GAYLES

XYZ CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS,

AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

_________________________________________________/

ORDER 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant’s, Waxman Sales LLC, d/b/a 

Birdrock Home (“Birdrock Home”), Unopposed Motion to Modify Ex Parte Temporary 

Restraining Order (“Motion”), [ECF No. 26]; and Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,

[ECF No. 21]. The Court has reviewed the Motion, the Notice, and the record and is otherwise 

fully advised.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion [ECF No. 26] is GRANTED.

2. The Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order [ECF No. 14] is hereby modified so as 

not to include Birdrock Home (Defendant No. 56 of Schedule A of the Complaint).

3. Birdrock Home is stricken from Schedule A of the Complaint.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 7th day of February, 2023.

 

__________________________________

 DARRIN P. GAYLES

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-24270-DPG Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2023 Page 1 of 1
FILED

October 19, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) 

) Supreme Court

Appellant, ) NO. 03-S-01-9706-CR-00060

)

) 

v. ) Hamilton County

) 

)

WILLIE WILLIAMS, JR., ) Court of Criminal Appeals

) Reversed in Part.

 ) 

 Appellee. )

ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

A petition for rehearing has been filed on behalf of the appellants. After

consideration of the same, a majority of the Court is of the opinion that the petition

should be and the same is hereby denied at the cost of appellant.

Justice Birch and Special Justice Reid adhere to the views

expressed in their original dissenting opinion.

_____________________________

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III,

JUSTICE

Concur:

Anderson, C.J.

Holder, J.