alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Date: September 30, 2011

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2019-1007: Peterson Industrial Depot v. US - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uVxaiSe8Gr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-01-2019-2019-1007-peterson-industrial-depot-v-us-audio-uploaded\/\">2019-1007: Peterson Industrial Depot v. US<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-01-2019-2019-1007-peterson-industrial-depot-v-us-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=uVxaiSe8Gr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2019-1007: Peterson Industrial Depot v. US” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"uVxaiSe8Gr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Peterson Industrial Depot v. US (mp3) Appeal Number: 2019-1007 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 43719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Intent To Grant an Exclusive License of a U.S. Government-Owned 
Patent

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(I)(i), 
announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-
bearing, revocable license to U.S. provisional patent number 60/723,442 
filed October 5, 2005 entitled ``Small Molecule Inhibitors of Botulinum 
Neurotoxins,'' to Microbiotix, Inc. with its principal place of 
business at 1 Innovation Drive, STE 15, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605-
4332.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 
ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, 
Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth 
Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul 
Mele, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664, both 
at telefax (301) 619-5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of 
this license can file written objections along with supporting 
evidence, if any, 15 days from the date of this publication. Written 
objections are to be filed with the Command Judge Advocate, U.S. Army 
Medical Research and Materiel Command, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, 
Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-6638 Filed 8-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2




                        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
                  OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



         I, Steven A. Schumm, the Chief Administrative Officer and Interim Chief
Financial Officer of CC V Holdings, LLC and CC V Holdings Finance, Inc.
(collectively, the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

         o        fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         o        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                               /s/  Steven A. Schumm
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Steven A. Schumm
                                               Chief Administrative Officer and
                                               Interim Chief Financial Officer
                                               August 12, 2003
No. 11-9774.

#### Weston *v.*McCall, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Amendment No. 2 for the Annual Report of Gilla
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period
ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Graham
Simmons, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
 The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information
contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Gilla
Inc.Date:
July 20, 2018
By:
/s/
Graham SimmondsName:
Graham SimmondsTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-1229 

________________________________________________________________________ 

REFUGEES 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CANADA 

Signed at Washington December 5, 2002 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CANADA 

Refugees 

 Agreement signed at Washington December 5, 2002; 

 Entered into force December 29, 2004.
% Food exposure

% Once daily oral exposure, dose that will result in 10% AChE inhibition in RBC

% Female adult, Body weight set to 72.9 kg

% Cecilia Tan

% August 24, 2015

prepare @clear @all

% Setting model parameters

start @NoCallback

use human_parameters_MRP

use preg_female_parameters

BWSW=1;% Set to 1 if BWT is provided

BWST=72.9;% Initial BW in kg

PREG=0;

TSTOP= 504% Exposure duration in hrs (21 days)

%21-day exposure

DT = xlsRead("Food1.xls", "POD", "A1:A22"); % Dosing Times

DORAL=xlsRead("Food1.xls", "POD", "B1:B22"); % Dose in ug/kg

prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy

start@nocallback

mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6]; %conc unit = ug/L

save mytable @file='food_POD_M.txt' @format=ascii
Exhibit 31.2



Rule 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATION



I, Harry V. Maccarrone, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of COMFORCE Corporation, hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 3, 2005



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Harry V. Maccarrone                             
|Harry V. Maccarrone                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



25
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Notice Amending Prior Notices Concerning In-Person Filings and Submissions - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XOC25Fr0Wl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-amending-prior-notices-concerning-in-person-filings-and-submissions\/\">Notice Amending Prior Notices Concerning In-Person Filings and Submissions<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-amending-prior-notices-concerning-in-person-filings-and-submissions\/embed\/#?secret=XOC25Fr0Wl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice Amending Prior Notices Concerning In-Person Filings and Submissions” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"XOC25Fr0Wl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Consistent with the prior\u00a0Order Modifying Procedures for Nonelectronic Filing (pdf)\u00a0(Nov. 2, 2020), the Clerk\u2019s Office is advising that paper filings and submissions are again available in-person through the night drop box on H Street, NW, as well as by couriers, third-party commercial carriers, and members of the public.\u00a0 While these options remain available, the Clerk\u2019s […]"}
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I,
Victor J. Salerno, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Wagering, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and the internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: May 17, 2011

/s/ VICTOR J. SALERNO Victor J. Salerno,President and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
No. 92-1554.

#### Hintz, Personal Representative of the Estate of Hintz, Deceased *v.*Park County, Montana, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Memorandum 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meetings 

From: John Bradfield 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

To: Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-6002, EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603, and EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495 

This memorandum summarizes meetings held with stakeholders in the month of December, 2014 

On December 10, Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan met with Lyle 

Witham of Basin Electric Power Company. Mr. Culligan generally answered basic questions about the 

clean power plan proposal for existing sources. 

On December 15, Clean Air Markets Division Director Reid Harvey and Sector Policy and Programs 

Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan met with the Georgia Environmental Protection Department. 

Meeting materials and attendees attached. EPA generally answered basic questions about the clean 

power plan proposal for existing sources. 

On December 16, Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan met with Conrad 

Schneider of the Clean Air Task Force (CATF). Mr. Culligan generally answered basic questions about the 

clean power plan proposal for existing sources. 

On December 18, Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan met with George 

Peridas of the Natrual Resources Defense Counsel (NRDC). Mr. Culligan generally answered basic 

questions about the clean power plan proposal for existing sources. 

Internet Address (U RL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
46963.

#### VAN BUI v. THE STATE.

(387 SE2d 895)

Decided December 5, 1989.

*Elizabeth C. Calhoun,*for appellant.

*Michael C. Eubanks, District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, C. A. Benjamin Woolf,*for appellee.

Bell, Justice.

The appellant, Luc Van Bui, was convicted of malice murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.* We affirm.

The appellant was jointly tried with his co-defendant, Harold 0. Mundy. We have previously affirmed Mundy’s conviction and life sentence for murder, *Mundy v. State,*259 Ga. 634 (385 SE2d 666) (1989). We adopt our fact summary from that opinion as the fact summary for this opinion, with the additional fact that Luc Van Bui drove the vehicle while Harold Mundy fired the murder wéapon.

The appellant’s sole enumeration of error is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict of acquittal on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to warrant his conviction as a party to malice murder. However, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution we find that a rational trier of fact could have found the appellant guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*

 The victim was killed on January 9,1988. The appellant was indicted on May 26,1988, and was tried on October 17-20, 1988. He was sentenced to life imprisonment in an order dated November 7,1988, and entered November 21,1988. Appellant moved for a new trial on November 18, 1988. The court reporter certified the trial transcript on December 21, 1988. Appellant amended his motion for new trial on February 27, 1989, and the court denied the motion for new trial on March 15, 1989. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on April 6, 1989, and the clerk of the trial court certified the record on April 18, 1989. The appeal was docketed in this court on April 20,1989, and was submitted for decision without oral argument on May 26, 1989.
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1



Exhibit 23.1      Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP




To the Board of Directors
North Central Bancshares, Inc.
Fort Dodge, Iowa



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the North Central Bancshares,
Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-8 of North Central Bancshares, Inc.,
pertaining to the North Central Bancshares, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, of our
report dated February 10, 1999, which appears in the annual report on Form 10-K
of North Central Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December
31, 1998.





                                                /s/  McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
                                                      McGladrey & Pullen, LLP





Des Moines, Iowa
March 25, 1999
46300.

#### SOUTHERN PAN & SHORING COMPANY et al. v. JACKSON.

(378 SE2d 854)

Weltner, Justice.

The facts of this case are set forth fully in *Jackson v. Southern Pan & Shoring Co.,*258 Ga. 401 (369 SE2d 239) (1988).

Jackson attempted to exercise a stock purchase warrant in May 1987. Southern Pan initiated a declaratory judgment action challenging the validity of the warrant. This court held that “[t]he trial court . . . erred by holding the warrant invalid and erred by denying Jackson’s motion for summary judgment on her claim that the warrant is valid and enforceable.” *Jackson v. Southern Pan & Shoring Co.,*258 Ga. at 403. Additionally, we entered the following order: “Sarah B. Jackson has filed with this Court a Motion for Restraining Order and Other Equitable Relief, which we decline to reach. The trial court is directed to hear and decide this motion pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-62 (c).”

After hearing, the trial court entered a restraining order against Southern Pan. Following additional motions and hearings, the trial court entered a second order, directing *inter alia*that Southern Pan relinquish control of the company to Jackson and issue share certificates accordingly. Southern Pan appealed.

These orders were consistent with the order of this court. The trial court did not abuse its discretion, nor exceed the bounds of its *261lawful authority.

Decided May 4, 1989

Reconsideration denied May 31, 1989.

*Martin, Snow, Grant & Napier, George C. Grant, Edward J. Harrell, Rich, Bass, Kidd & Witcher, Casper Rich, King & Spalding, Griffin B. Bell, M. Robert Thornton,*for appellants.

*Sell & Melton, John D. Comer, Ellwood F. Oakley III,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Bell, J., who concurs in the judgment only.*