alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Administrative Order No. 2021-10

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

O R D E R

Modifying Court Operations

As of March 16, 2020, the court has issued several 

administration orders restricting and modifying court 

operations at the Howard T. Markey National Courts 

Building following declared public health emergencies 

affecting Washington, D.C. and the National Capital 

Region. Upon consideration of current public health 

guidance, the need for continued protocols to protect the 

health and safety of those working and conducting business 

in the National Courts Building, and the court’s desire to 

resume normal operations as soon as possible, I find, on 

behalf of the court, that the following modifications are 

necessary to continue effective operations. See Fed. Cir. R. 

47(c).

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Orders entered on March 16, 2020 (Operations 

Status Order 2020-03), March 20, 2020

(Administrative Order 2020-01), May 18, 2020 

(Administrative Order 2020-02), and November 2, 

2020 (Administrative Order 2021-02) are 

rescinded.

(2) Public access to the National Courts Building 

remains temporarily restricted pursuant to 

Administrative Order 2021-09 (May 22, 2021) and 

any subsequently issued extension or modification 

of that order. 

(3) The Clerk’s Office is directed to resume scheduling 

in-person arguments beginning with the 

September 2021 session. The Clerk’s Office is 

authorized to issue any additional protocols and 

procedures necessary to support in-person 

arguments. Until further notice, the Clerk’s Office 

CERTIFIED COPY

I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS DOCUMENT IS A 

TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE 

ORIGINAL ON FILE. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

PETER R. MARKSTEINER, CLERK OF COURT By Deputy Clerk: Date: Jarrett B. Perlow June 22, 2021
2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

is directed to continue providing online audio 

streaming of public court hearings. Cases 

scheduled for July and August will proceed as 

notified by the Clerk’s Office.

(4) For the period that the National Courts Building

remains restricted by Administrative Order, the

Clerk’s Office may implement necessary

procedures concerning the accessibility and

availability of the Clerk’s Office to receive

nonelectronic filings pursuant to Federal Rule of

Appellate Procedure 26 and Federal Circuit Rule

26. The Clerk’s Office shall provide public notice

of any such procedures.

(5) The Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court is

directed to provide public notice of this Order and

to take any necessary and proper actions to

implement the provisions of this Order.

FOR THE COURT

June 22, 2021 /s/ Kimberly A. Moore

 Date Kimberly A. Moore

 Chief Judge
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
 Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a list of information collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (301)443-7978. *Survey of Organized Consumer Self-Help Entities*
                    —New—The self-help movement in the United States has mushroomed, and increasingly serves mental health consumers and family members as a complement to, or substitution for, traditional mental health services. The purposes of this project of SAMHSA's Center for Mental Health Services are to estimate the number of self-help entities nationwide and to describe their characteristics—structure, types of activities engaged in, approaches to well-being and recovery, resources, and linkages to other entities in the community, such as the mental health service delivery system. The survey will gather information from a sample of approximately 3,900 mental health self-help entities run by and for recipients of mental health services and/or their family members. Data will be 
                    ( print page 40677)
                    collected from three types of self-help entities: mutual support groups; self-help organizations; and, consumer-operated businesses and services. Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) will be used to conduct interviews with in-scope entities. The total response burden estimate is shown below. Instrument
Number of respondents
Responses/respondent
Average burden/ response (hours)
Total burden (hours)Universe Development Contacts
2,736
1
.17
465Screener
3,933
1
.17
668Questionnaire
3,933
1
.42
1,652Total



2,785
 Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to: Clarissa Rodriques-Coelho, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503. Dated: June 23, 2000. Richard Kopanda, Executive Officer, SAMHSA.


[FR Doc. 00-16549 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"18-1849: INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC v. IANCU [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BCb7cGxZaQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/9-18-2019-18-1849-intra-cellular-therapies-inc-v-iancu-opinion-precedential-18-1849-opinion-9-18-2019\/\">18-1849: INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC v. IANCU [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/9-18-2019-18-1849-intra-cellular-therapies-inc-v-iancu-opinion-precedential-18-1849-opinion-9-18-2019\/embed\/#?secret=BCb7cGxZaQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“18-1849: INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC v. IANCU [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"BCb7cGxZaQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC v. IANCU [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 18-1849 Origin: DCT Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
No. 11-5097.

#### Wellington *v.*Sexton, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2020-1429: Kilbourne v. Apple Inc. - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ytZiU4RtIC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-02-2020-2020-1429-kilbourne-v-apple-inc-audio-uploaded\/\">2020-1429: Kilbourne v. Apple Inc.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-02-2020-2020-1429-kilbourne-v-apple-inc-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=ytZiU4RtIC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2020-1429: Kilbourne v. Apple Inc.” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"ytZiU4RtIC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Kilbourne v. Apple Inc. (mp3) Appeal Number: 2020-1429 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
VERMILION CLIFFS NATIONAL MONUMENT ROUTE DESIGNATIONS

LOCATION #: B1

pt

V1058

Legend

Route Designation

Open to All Users (mitigating measures may apply)
Open to All Users for ATV Use Only
Open to All Users with Seasonal Restrictions

Open to All Users for Non-Motorized Use;
Mechanized Use Limits May Vary

Administrative Use Only (open to administrative
motorized uses and non-motorized public uses;
public mechanized use limits may vary)

Closed to All Motorized Use and Mechanized Use
(permanent closure as a route)

Undesignated Routes (outside jurisdiction i.e. private
land, other Federal land, State land, or routes to be
designated in future planning)

0 1 2
SET kilometers

is)

1

: fie ri

Land Status

Bureau of Land Management
| Native American Reservation
|) National Park Service

Private
a State or Arizona
HQ Monument Boundary
TN ~Wilderness Boundary
mmr State Boundary

Note: Decisions in this document only apply to Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) lands in the Planning Area.

Bureau of Land Management
Arizona Strip District Office

Not all routes are labeled. Many smaller routes were not labeled due to overlap
problems. If you have questions on specific routes that you cannot answer by
viewing these maps, you can either contact the BLM or review the GIS data.

This product may not meet BLM standards for accuracy and content. Different
data sources and input scales may cause some misalignment of data layers.

wT ©

LOCATION MAP

|_| Vermition ciifs

National Monument

Universal Transverse Mercator
North American 1983

1:24,000

Arizona Strip GIS Team

Jan 28, 2008
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE 5>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       25437
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             25437
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               25437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         9600
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      5000
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 25437
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             20703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (20703)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (20703)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (20703)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)



</TABLE>
No. 11-8579.

#### Del Bosque *v.*AT&T Advertising, L. P., dba AT&T Advertising & Publishing.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

February 7, 2017 
  

 
 Warren Eisenberg 

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. 
 650 Liberty Avenue 

Union, NJ 07083 
 Dear Mr. Eisenberg: 

We write to confirm that in order to provide additional time for discussions respecting revisions to your employment agreement, as amended
(the “Agreement”), the Agreement is hereby amended so that the Final Date thereunder shall be May 26, 2017. Except as aforesaid, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and unchanged. 

 
  

			
	BED BATH & BEYOND INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Steven H. Temares
		 	 Steven H. Temares
 Chief Executive
Officer



  
  

ACCEPTED AND AGREED: 
  

	
	
	
	/s/ Warren Eisenberg
	Warren Eisenberg
Exhibit 99.3

Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors of Chase Bank USA, N.A.,
Transferor and Servicer

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Servicing of Securitized Credit Card
Receivables, that Chase Bank USA, NA (the "Bank", formerly known as "Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A."), as servicer of the Chase Credit Card Master Trust
(the "Trust"), maintained effective internal control over servicing of
securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2004, in compliance with
the Chase Credit Card Master Trust Fourth Amended and Restated Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of October 15, 2004, based upon the criteria for
effective internal control established in "Internal Control - Integrated
Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Bank's management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over servicing of securitized credit card receivables. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
servicing of the securitized credit card receivables, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatements due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Chase Bank USA, NA, as servicer of
the Chase Credit Card Master Trust, maintained effective internal control over
servicing of securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2004, in
compliance with the Chase Credit Card Master Trust Fourth Amended and Restated
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 15, 2004, is fairly stated,
in all material respects, based upon the criteria for effective internal control
established in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------

March 29, 2005
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Notice Regarding Operations During Possible Lapse in Federal Appropriations - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QlQWQhq34k\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-regarding-operations-during-possible-lapse-in-federal-appropriations\/\">Notice Regarding Operations During Possible Lapse in Federal Appropriations<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-regarding-operations-during-possible-lapse-in-federal-appropriations\/embed\/#?secret=QlQWQhq34k\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice Regarding Operations During Possible Lapse in Federal Appropriations” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"QlQWQhq34k\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"In the event of a lapse in federal appropriations on Sunday, October 1, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will remain open for business and will be fully staffed to provide all judicial business functions until further notice from the court. Arguments scheduled for the week of October 2, 2023, […]"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1359: HAMPTON v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KcrLVRHxX3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-05-2023-22-1359-hampton-v-mcdonough-opinion-22-1359-opinion-6-5-2023_2137068\/\">22-1359: HAMPTON v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-05-2023-22-1359-hampton-v-mcdonough-opinion-22-1359-opinion-6-5-2023_2137068\/embed\/#?secret=KcrLVRHxX3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1359: HAMPTON v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"KcrLVRHxX3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: HAMPTON v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1359 Origin: CAVC Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}