alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Notice of New Revised Protocols for In-Person Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"V3fsDxwSYe\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-new-revised-protocols-for-in-person-argument\/\">Notice of New Revised Protocols for In-Person Argument<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-new-revised-protocols-for-in-person-argument\/embed\/#?secret=V3fsDxwSYe\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of New Revised Protocols for In-Person Argument” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"V3fsDxwSYe\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has issued\u00a0Revised Protocols for In-Person Argument (pdf)\u00a0that will apply to the January 2022 court sitting and subsequent sittings until further notice.\u00a0 Based on the Revised Protocols, the court has also updated the\u00a0Certification of Compliance (Form 33A) (pdf)\u00a0required to be filed ahead of time for all arguing […]"}
§ 25.205 Minimum antenna elevation angle. ( a ) Earth station antennas must not transmit at elevation angles less than five degrees, measured from the horizontal plane to the direction of maximum radiation, in a frequency band shared with terrestrial radio services or in a frequency band with an allocation to space services operating in both the Earth-to-space and space-to-Earth directions. In other bands, earth station antennas must not transmit at elevation angles less than three degrees. In some instances, it may be necessary to specify greater minimum elevation angles because of interference considerations.
( b ) ESAAs in aircraft on the ground must not transmit at elevation angles less than three degrees. There is no minimum angle of antenna elevation for ESAAs while airborne.
[81 FR 55336, Aug. 18, 2016]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.791 Reports and requests to be filed under part 32 of this chapter.

Reports and requests shall be filed either periodically, upon the happening of specified events, or for specific approval by telephone companies in accordance with and subject to the provisions of part 32 of this chapter.

[82 FR 20840, May 4, 2017]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      In connection with the periodic report of Connetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John L. Higgins, Chief
Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development
of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: December 2, 2003                  /s/ John L. Higgins
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John L. Higgins
                                        Executive Vice President, Finance
                                        and Corporate Development
                                        Chief Financial Officer
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No . 02 - 21 - 00066 - CR No. 02 - 21 - 00067 - CR No. 02 - 21 - 00068 - CR

___________________________ On Appeal from the 211th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No s . F21 - 1256 - 211, F21 - 1257 - 211, F21 - 1258 - 211 Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### E X PARTE 

### R OSS 

### C LACK2 MEM O RANDUM OPI N ION AND J UDGMENT Appellant has moved to dismiss his appeal. Because we have not yet decided this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f) . Per Curiam Do Not Publish Tex. R. App . P. 47.2(b) Deliv e red: Augu s t 19, 2021
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4317

To designate temporary protected status under the Immigration and

Nationality Act for Rwandan students in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1994

Mr. KOPETSKI (for himself and Mr. JEFFERSON) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To designate temporary protected status under the Immigration and Nationality Act for Rwandan students in the

United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TEMPORARY PROTECTED

4 STATUS FOR RWANDAN STUDENTS.

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—In accordance with the provi6 sions of this section, Rwanda is hereby designated under

7 section 244A(b)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1254a(b)), but only with respect to eligible

9 aliens under subsection (b).
2

•HR 4317 IH

1 (b) ALIENS ELIGIBLE.—For the purposes of this sec2 tion an eligible alien is an alien who—

3 (1) is a national of Rwanda (or in the case of

4 an alien having no nationality, is a person who last

5 habitually resided in Rwanda);

6 (2) as of April 6, 1994, has been admitted or

7 who has otherwise lawfully attained the status of a

8 nonimmigrant under section 101(15)(F) or

9 101(15)((M);

10 (3) has been continuously physically present in

11 the United States since April 6, 1994;

12 (4) is admissible as an immigrant, except as

13 otherwise provided under section 244(c)(2)(A) of

14 such Act and is not ineligible for temporary pro15 tected status under section 244A(c)(2)(B) of such

16 Act; and

17 (5) registers for temporary protected status in

18 a manner which the Attorney General shall estab19 lish.

20 (c) PERIOD OF DESIGNATION.—The designation

21 under subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of enact22 ment of this Act and shall remain in effect for a period

23 of 12 months or until the President certifies that the con24 ditions for designation under section 244A(b)(1)(A) are

25 no longer being met, whichever occurs earlier. The Presi-
3

•HR 4317 IH

1 dent may extend the period of designation under this sec2 tion.

3 (d) APPLICATION OF IMMIGRATION AND NATIONAL4 ITY ACT PROVISIONS.—Except as specifically provided in

5 this section, section 244A and other provisions of the Im6 migration and Nationality Act shall apply to the designa7 tion of temporary protected status under this section.

Æ
§ 25.102 Station authorization required. ( a ) No person shall use or operate apparatus for the transmission of energy or communications or signals by space or earth stations except under, and in accordance with, an appropriate authorization granted by the Federal Communications Commission.
( b ) Protection from impermissible levels of interference to the reception of signals by earth stations in the Fixed-Satellite Service from terrestrial stations in a co-equally shared band is provided through the authorizations granted under this part.
[56 FR 24016, May 28, 1991]
FY 2007 Report of Withdrawals in Accordance with the “Interim Guidelines Governing Re-review 

of Previously Declassified Records at the National Archives,” issued by ISOO in April 2006 

The interim guidelines, available online at http://www.archives.gov/isoo/reports/2006-audit-report-attach2.pdf, are pending formal promulgation, to include public comment, as a change to 32 C.F.R. Part 

2001.13. 

Please refer to the “Audit of the Withdrawal of Records from Public Access at the National Archives and 

Records Administration for Classification Purposes, April 26, 2006,” 

(http://www.archives.gov/isoo/reports/2006-audit-report.html) concerning records formally withdrawn 

prior to April 26, 2006. 

First Quarter FY 2007, October – December 2006 

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal 

NARA Location Where 

Withdrawal Took Place 

Date 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn 

Air Force College Park, MD 12/2006 1 1 

Second Quarter FY 2007, January - March 2007 

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal 

NARA Location Where 

Withdrawal Took Place 

Date 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn 

Air Force College Park, MD 1/2007 1 1 

DOE College Park, MD 2/2007 1 7 

Third Quarter FY 2007, April - June 2007 

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal 

NARA Location Where 

Withdrawal Took Place 

Date 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn 

None withdrawn 

Fourth Quarter FY 2007, July - September 2007 

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal 

NARA Location Where 

Withdrawal Took Place 

Date 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn 

None withdrawn 

For more information about this report, contact NARA’s Public Affairs Office at (202) 357-5100.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Gregory C. Talbott is the Executive VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of PFF Bancorp, Inc.

This statement is being furnished in connection with thefiling by the Capital Accumulation Plan for Employees of PFF Bank & Trust ofthe Annual Report on Form 11-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the"Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

- the Report fully complies with the requirements of          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934          (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and    
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all          material respects, the net assets available for plan benefits of the          Capital Accumulation Plan for Employees of PFF Bank & Trust as of          December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the changes in net assets available for          plan benefits for the years then ended.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit tothe Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as theReport is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

| June 25, 2003
 

/s/ Gregory C. Talbott
Dated 
Gregory C. Talbott
 

  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 27.75 Basic interoperability requirement. ( a ) ( 1 ) Mobile and portable stations that operate on any portion of frequencies in the paired 1755-1780 MHz and 2155-2180 MHz band must be capable of operating on all frequencies in the paired 1710-1780 MHz and 2110-2180 MHz band, using the same air interfaces that the equipment utilizes on any frequencies in the paired 1710-1780 MHz and 2110-2180 MHz band.
( 2 ) Mobile and portable stations that operate on any portion of frequencies in the 600 MHz band must be capable of operating on all frequencies in the 600 MHz band using the same air interfaces that the equipment utilizes on any frequencies in the 600 MHz band.
( 3 ) Mobile and portable stations that operate on any portion of frequencies in the 3700-3980 MHz band must be capable of operating on all frequencies in the 3700-3980 MHz band using the same air interfaces that the equipment utilizes on any frequencies in the 3700-3980 MHz band.
( 4 ) Mobile and portable stations that operate on any portion of frequencies in the 3450-3550 MHz band must be capable of operating on all frequencies in the 3450-3550 MHz band using the same air interfaces that the equipment utilizes on any frequencies in the 3450-3550 MHz band.
( b ) The basic interoperability requirement in paragraph (a) of this section does not require a licensee to use any particular industry standard. Devices may also contain functions that are not operational in U.S. Territories.
[79 FR 32413, June 4, 2014, as amended at 79 FR 48539, Aug. 15, 2014; 85 FR 22882, Apr. 23, 2020; 86 FR 17954, Apr. 7, 2021]
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4559

To amend the Anglo-Irish Agreement Support Act of 1986 to prohibit United

States contributions to the International Fund for Ireland.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 1994

Mr. KLUG (for himself, Mr. PENNY, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia,

Mr. DOOLITTLE, and Mr. COBLE) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Anglo-Irish Agreement Support Act of 1986

to prohibit United States contributions to the International Fund for Ireland.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE

4 INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR IRELAND.

5 Section 3 of the Anglo-Irish Agreement Support Act

6 of 1986 (Public Law 99-415; 100 Stat. 947) is amended

7 to read as follows:
2

•HR 4559 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES CONTRIBUTIONS

2 TO THE INTERNATIONAL FUND.

3 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act,

4 funds appropriated by the Congress may not be used for

5 any United States contribution to the International

6 Fund.’’.

Æ
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In   connection   with  the   accompanying   Annual   Report  of  Concierge
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June
30,  2006 (the  "Report"),  I, Allen E.  Kahn,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:  March 19, 2007                                /s/ Allen E. Kahn
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Allen E. Kahn
                                                     Chief Executive Officer



     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.














                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Statement of the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit* - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aV1tkks9Bo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/statement-of-the-judicial-council-of-the-federal-circuit\/\">Statement of the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit*<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/statement-of-the-judicial-council-of-the-federal-circuit\/embed\/#?secret=aV1tkks9Bo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statement of the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit*” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"aV1tkks9Bo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Recent public reports state that a proceeding under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act and the implementing Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings has been initiated naming Judge Pauline Newman as the subject judge.  No member of the Judicial Council was a source of the information reported, which the reports attribute to persons who have [...]"}
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4283

To terminate the Milstar II Communications Satellite program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1994

Mrs. MALONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To terminate the Milstar II Communications Satellite

program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF MILSTAR II COMMUNICA4 TIONS SATELLITE PROGRAM.

5 (a) TERMINATION OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary of

6 Defense shall terminate the Milstar II Communications

7 Satellite program.

8 (b) PAYMENT OF TERMINATION COSTS.—Funds

9 available on or after the date of the enactment of this Act

10 for obligation for the Milstar II Communications Satellite

11 program may be obligated for that program only for pay-
2

•HR 4283 IH

1 ment of the costs associated with the termination of that

2 program.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Rules of Practice Amendments 2016 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jCso4vg0Ec\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/rules-procedures-forms\/rules-of-practice-amendments\/rules-of-practice-amendments-2016\/\">Rules of Practice Amendments 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/rules-procedures-forms\/rules-of-practice-amendments\/rules-of-practice-amendments-2016\/embed\/#?secret=jCso4vg0Ec\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Rules of Practice Amendments 2016” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"jCso4vg0Ec\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Amendment Notices The Federal Circuit has revised its local rules and hereby provides those revisions along with amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP).  Those rules, which are applicable to cases docketed on or after December 1, 2016, are available on the court’s website. The principal local rule revisions are in response to [...]"}