alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD

<S>                                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    Jan-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                       Feb-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                         Oct-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                17,585,967
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            485,931
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                                            0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                                          0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                                      776,943
<PP&E>                                                                   239,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        19,305,014
<SHORT-TERM>                                                                   0
<PAYABLES>                                                               175,190
<REPOS-SOLD>                                                                   0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                                            0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                                       322,913
<LONG-TERM>                                                              400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                 114,763
<OTHER-SE>                                                            16,899,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          19,305,014
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                                        869,727
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                                     336,890
<COMMISSIONS>                                                          6,272,161
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                                                  0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        19,605
<COMPENSATION>                                                         3,715,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        1,669,231
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                                             1,669,231
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           1,040,167
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               0.11



</TABLE>
# Comments on: 19-2087: ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION v. SHOPPERSCHOICE.COM, LLC [OPINION], Precedential
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Nustate Energy Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kathleen A. Roberton, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



May
2, 2016



|By: | /s/
    Kathleen A. Roberton         | 
|--- | ------------------------------------ | 
|    | Kathleen
    A. Roberton             | 
|    | CEO,
    principal executive officer | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# 50th Anniversary of Our National Motto, “In God We Trust,” 2006

On the 50th anniversary of our national motto, “In God We Trust,” we reflect on these words that guide millions of Americans, recognize the blessings of the Creator, and offer our thanks for His great gift of liberty. 

From its earliest days, the United States has been a Nation of faith. During the War of 1812, as the morning light revealed that the battle-torn American flag still flew above Fort McHenry, Francis Scott Key penned, “And this be our motto: `In God is our trust!' ” His poem became our National Anthem, reminding generations of Americans to “Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.” On July 30, 1956, President Dwight Eisenhower signed the law officially establishing “In God We Trust” as our national motto.

Today, our country stands strong as a beacon of religious freedom. Our citizens, whatever their faith or background, worship freely and millions answer the universal call to love their neighbor and serve a cause greater than self. 

As we commemorate the 50th anniversary of our national motto and remember with thanksgiving God's mercies throughout our history, we recognize a divine plan that stands above all human plans and continue to seek His will. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim July 30, 2006, as the 50th Anniversary of our National Motto, “In God We Trust.” I call upon the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-seventh day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 06-6643

Billing code 3195-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40467

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANGELICA MARIE MONDRAGON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 1:10-CR-61-2

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Angelica Mondragon pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement,

to transporting an illegal alien within the United States for private financial

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 6, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40467 Document: 00511436131 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2011
No. 10-40467

gain. She argues that her sentence is unlawful because the district court did not

follow the terms of her plea agreement, which she asserts required the court to

grant a downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1. Although Mondragon’s challenge to the legality of her sentence may be barred by the appellatewaiver provision in the agreement, the government has failed to invoke the

waiver with respect to this claim, so normally we would be able to review its

merits. See United States v. Story, 439 F.3d 226, 231 (5th Cir. 2006).

Because Mondragon received a short sentence of only ten months, she has

completed her term and thus has been released. Despite that she still must complete her three years’ supervised release, this appeal is moot, as explained in No.

08-10341, United States v. Boston, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 6036, at *1-*4 (5th Cir.

Mar. 23, 2011) (per curiam) (unpublished). Our obligation to examine possible

mootness sua sponte, see id. at *1, leads us necessarily to dismiss the appeal for

want of jurisdiction in light of its mootness.

If we were to examine the merits, we would affirm. Mondragon has failed

to showSSunder any standardSSthat the refusal to grant a sentence reduction

under § 5K3.1 was contrary to the terms of the plea agreement. Mondragon also

contends the district court erred in assessing a two-level role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) because, she says, the facts did not support that she

occupied a leadership role. She further asserts that the court imposed a harsher

sentence based on misleading facts in the presentence report and violated its obligations under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(3)(B) by not inquiring

into the accuracy of this erroneous information. These issues are barred by the

appeal waiver provision in the plea agreement.

The appeal is DISMISSED as moot.

2

Case: 10-40467 Document: 00511436131 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/06/2011
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Abraham Pierce, President and Chief Executive Officer of Fonecash, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on 10QSB of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 5, 2005



/s/ Abraham Pierce

_______________________



Abraham Pierce

President and Chief Executive Officer
## In This Section 

          -  Budget Home 
          -  Who We Are               -  About Us 
            -  Office of Budget History 
            -  Present and Past Directors 
            -  Contact Us 
          -  Budget by Year 
          -  What We Do               -  Budget Data 
            -  Great American Outdoors Act (GAOA) 
            -  Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) 
          -  Resources               -  Budget and Performance Portal 
            -  Office of Management and Budget 
            -  U.S. Congressional Budget Office 
            -  U.S. Chief Financial Officers Council 
            -  U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee 
            -  U.S. House Appropriations Committee 
            -  U.S. House of Representatives: Committee on House Rules (for Pen and Ink Committee Marks) 
            -  Congress.Gov: Library of Congress 
            -  American Association for Budget and Program Analysis 
            -  GPO Congressional Documents 

Share
              - Facebook
              - LinkedIn
              - Reddit
              - Pinterest
              - X (formerly Twitter)

# Appropriations

### Current Fiscal Year Appropriation

              - Fiscal Year 2025

### Prior Fiscal Year Appropriations

              - Fiscal Year 2024
              - Fiscal Year 2023
              - Fiscal Year 2022
              - Fiscal Year 2021
              - Fiscal Year 2020

## Was this page helpful?

This page was not helpful because the content:

Please provide a comment
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT 

Bank of Florida N.A. f/k/a Citizens National Bank of Southwest Florida, Naples, CollierCounty, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida. 

Bank of Florida Trust Company f/k/a Citizens Capital Management, Inc., Naples, Collier County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State ofFlorida. 

Bank of Florida, Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida. 

Bank of Florida, Tampa Bay, Hillsborough County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida
§ 25.112 Dismissal and return of applications. ( a ) An application will be unacceptable for filing and will be returned to the applicant with a brief statement identifying the omissions or discrepancies if: ( 1 ) The application is defective with respect to completeness of answers to questions, informational showings, internal inconsistencies, execution, or other matters of a formal character; or
( 2 ) The application does not substantially comply with the Commission's rules, regulations, specific requests for additional information, or other requirements.
( 3 ) [Reserved]
( 4 ) The application is identical to a pending application that was timely filed pursuant to § 25.157 or § 25.158.
( b ) Applications for space station authority found defective under paragraph (a)(4) of this section will not be considered. Applications for authority found defective under paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section may be accepted for filing if: ( 1 ) The application is accompanied by a request which sets forth the reasons in support of a waiver of (or an exception to), in whole or in part, any specific rule, regulation, or requirement with which the application is in conflict;
( 2 ) The Commission, upon its own motion, waives (or allows an exception to), in whole or in part, any rule, regulation or requirement.
( c ) The Commission will dismiss an application for failure to prosecute or for failure to respond substantially within a specified time period to official correspondence or requests for additional information. Dismissal will be without prejudice unless the application is mutually exclusive pursuant to § 25.155, in which case it will be dismissed with prejudice.
( d ) An application will be dismissed without prejudice as a matter of right if the applicant requests its dismissal prior to final Commission action.
[56 FR 24016, May 28, 1991, as amended at 68 FR 51502, Aug. 27, 2003; 79 FR 8314, Feb. 12, 2014; 81 FR 55326, Aug. 18, 2016; 85 FR 43733, July 20, 2020; 88 FR 84753, Dec. 6, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             319
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,324
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        220
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,032
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,935
<LOANS>                                         27,031
<ALLOWANCE>                                        181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,817
<DEPOSITS>                                      28,195
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                415
<LONG-TERM>                                        300
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  36,817
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,377
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  190
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   202
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,769
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,477
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,505
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,264
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    321
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         224
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       224
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.67
<LOANS-NON>                                        261
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   190
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  187
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            187
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-1473: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC. v. AURIS HEALTH, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JQbEYq5lkT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-14-2022-21-1473-intuitive-surgical-operations-inc-v-auris-health-inc-rule-36-judgment-21-1473-rule_36_judgment-3-14-2022_1920956\/\">21-1473: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC. v. AURIS HEALTH, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-14-2022-21-1473-intuitive-surgical-operations-inc-v-auris-health-inc-rule-36-judgment-21-1473-rule_36_judgment-3-14-2022_1920956\/embed\/#?secret=JQbEYq5lkT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-1473: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC. v. AURIS HEALTH, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"JQbEYq5lkT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"RULE 36 JUDGMENT Posted: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC. v. AURIS HEALTH, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-1473 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON :

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,

http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center,

U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, gpo@custhelp.com.

61–909 PDF 2010

S. Hrg. 111–691 

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE 

ON THE ARTICLES AGAINST 

JUDGE G. THOMAS PORTEOUS, JR. 

HEARINGS

BEFORE THE

SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL 

COMMITTEE 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

ON

THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST JUDGE G. THOMAS 

PORTEOUS, JR., A JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 

November 16, 2010 

Volume 1 of 3, Part C 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate 
ii

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE ON THE ARTICLES 

AGAINST JUDGE G. THOMAS PORTEOUS, JR. 

CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri, Chairman

ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Vice Chairman 

AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota 

SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island 

TOM UDALL, New Mexico 

JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire 

EDWARD E. KAUFMAN, Delaware 

JIM DEMINT, South Carolina 

JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming 

ROGER WICKER, Mississippi 

MIKE JOHANNS, Nebraska 

JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho 

COMMITTEE STAFF 

DERRON R. PARKS, Staff Director and Chief Counsel 

THOMAS L. JIPPING, Deputy Staff Director and Deputy Chief Counsel 

JUSTIN KIM, Counsel

REBECCA S. SEIDEL, Counsel

ERIN P. JOHNSON, Deputy Counsel and Chief Clerk 

LAKE DISHMAN, Professional Staff Member 

CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE STAFF 

SUSAN NAVARRO SMELCER, Analyst on the Federal Judiciary 

SENATE LEGAL COUNSEL STAFF 

MORGAN J. FRANKEL, Senate Legal Counsel 

PATRICIA MACK BRYAN, Deputy Senate Legal Counsel 

GRANT R. VINIK, Assistant Senate Legal Counsel 

THOMAS E. CABALLERO, Assistant Senate Legal Counsel 
iii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Committee gratefully acknowledges the high standard of professionalism and 

long hours of dedicated service of its staff. The Committee also expresses its appreciation to Lynden C. Armstrong, Chief Clerk of the Committee on Rules and Administration, and to the following staff of Committee members: 

STAFF OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS 

Senator MCCASKILL, Chairman, Derron R. Parks 

Senator HATCH, Vice Chairman, Thomas L. Jipping 

Senator KLOBUCHAR, Paige Herwig 

Senator WHITEHOUSE, Stephen C. N. Lilley and Justin G. Florence 

Senator UDALL, Matthew T. Nelson 

Senator SHAHEEN, Thomas J. Maloney 

Senator KAUFMAN, Nhan Nguyen 

Senator DEMINT, Erica Suares 

Senator BARRASSO, Bryn Stewart 

Senator WICKER, Emily Ferris 

Senator JOHANNS, Sarah Novascone 

Senator RISCH, Jason Bohrer 

INTERNS

Christian Dibblee 

Timothy Holman 

Hannah Lockhart 

Annie Moulton 

Michael Naclerio 

Patrick Sadler