alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4326

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to limit the applicability

of the generation-skipping transfer tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 1994

Mr. BREWSTER (for himself, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. GEPHARDT, Mr. SHAW,

and Mr. KOPETSKI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to limit the

applicability of the generation-skipping transfer tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON APPLICABILITY OF GENERA4 TION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAX.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2651 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to generation assignment) is

7 amended by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f),

8 and by inserting after subsection (d) the following new

9 subsection:
2

•HR 4326 IH

1 ‘‘(e) SPECIAL RULE FOR PERSONS WITH A DE2 CEASED PARENT.—

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of determin4 ing whether any transfer is a generation-skipping

5 transfer, if—

6 ‘‘(A) an individual who has an interest in

7 property is a descendant of a parent of the

8 transferor (or the transferor’s spouse or former

9 spouse), and

10 ‘‘(B) such individual’s parent who is a lin11 eal descendant of the parent of the transferor

12 (or the transferor’s spouse or former spouse) is

13 dead at the time the transfer from which such

14 interest is established or derived is subject to a

15 tax imposed by chapter 11 or 12 upon the

16 transferor (and if there shall be more than 1

17 such time, then at the latest such time),

18 such individual shall be treated as if such individual

19 were a member of the generation which is 1 genera20 tion below the lower of the transferor’s generation or

21 the generation assignment of the youngest living an22 cestor of such individual who is also a descendant of

23 the parent of the transferor (or the transferor’s

24 spouse or former spouse), and the generation assign-
3

•HR 4326 IH

1 ment of any descendant of such individual shall be

2 adjusted accordingly.

3 ‘‘(2) LIMITED APPLICATION OF SUBSECTION TO

4 COLLATERAL HEIRS.—This subsection shall not

5 apply to any individual who is not a lineal descend6 ant of the transferor (or the transferor’s spouse or

7 former spouse) if, at the time of the transfer, such

8 transferor has any living lineal descendant.’’

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

10 (1) Section 2612(c) of the Internal Revenue

11 Code of 1986 (defining direct skip) is amended by

12 striking paragraph (2) and by redesignating para13 graph (3) as paragraph (2).

14 (2) Section 2612(c)(2) of such Code (as so re15 designated) is amended by striking ‘‘section

16 2651(e)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2651(f)(2)’’.

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

18 this section shall apply to terminations, distributions, and

19 transfers occurring after the date of the enactment of this

20 section.

Æ
§ 32.2422 Underground cable. ( a ) This account shall include the original cost of underground cable installed in conduit and of other material used in the construction of such plant. Subsidiary record categories, as defined below, are to be maintained for nonmetallic underground cable and metallic underground cable. ( 1 ) *Nonmetallic cable.* This subsidiary record category shall include the original cost of optical fiber cable and other associated material used in constructing a physical path for the transmission of telecommunications signals.
( 2 ) *Metallic cable.* This subsidiary record category shall include the original cost of single or paired conductor cable, wire and other associated material used in constructing a physical path for the transmission of telecommunications signals.
( b ) The cost of pumping water out of manholes and of cleaning manholes and ducts in connection with construction work and the cost of permits and privileges for the construction of cable and wire facilities shall be included in the account chargeable with such construction.
( c ) The cost of drop and block wires served by underground cable shall be included in Account 2423, Buried Cable.
( d ) The cost of cables leading from the main distributing frame or equivalent to central office equipment shall be included in the appropriate switching, transmission or other operations asset account.
```

[House Report 106-55]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
1st Session             HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                 106-55

=======================================================================

 
  PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 975, REDUCING THE VOLUME OF 
    STEEL IMPORTS AND ESTABLISHING A STEEL IMPORT NOTIFICATION AND 
                           MONITORING PROGRAM

                                _______
                                

   March 16, 1999.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 114]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 114, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               brief summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 975, 
``Reducing the Volume of Steel Imports and Establishing a Steel 
Import Notification and Monitoring Program,'' under a closed 
rule. The rule waives all points of order against consideration 
of the bill.
    The rule further provides ninety minutes of debate in the 
House divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Ways and Means. Finally, the rule 
provides for one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    The waiver of all points of order includes the following 
points of order which would lie against consideration of the 
bill. First, the bill violates Section 311(a) of the 
Congressional Budget Act (prohibiting consideration of 
legislation or an amendment that would cause the total level of 
new budget authority or outlays in the most recent budget 
resolution to be exceeded or would cause revenues to be less). 
According to the Congressional Budget Office cost estimate, if 
enacted, H.R. 975 would cause revenues to be reduced by 
$500,000 in fiscal year 1999, and by $43 million over the 1999 
through 2004 period. Consequently, revenue levels would be 
below those assumed in the budget process for FY 1999. 
Secondly, the bill violates clause 4(a) of Rule XIII (requiring 
a three-day layover of the committee report). The report was 
filed on Monday, March 15, and the bill may be considered as 
early as Wednesday, March 17.

                                

```
44664 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 151 / Monday, August 7, 2006 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 06–6732 Filed 8–4–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 06–30] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 06–30 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

and Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: August 1, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 151 / Monday, August 7, 2006 / Notices 44665 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN07AU06.047</GPH>
44666 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 151 / Monday, August 7, 2006 / Notices 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN07AU06.048</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 151 / Monday, August 7, 2006 / Notices 44667 

[FR Doc. 06–6733 Filed 8–4–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Inspector General; 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

[DOD–2006–OS–0171] 

AGENCY: Office of the Inspector General, 

DoD. 

ACTION: Notice To Add Systems of 

Records. 

SUMMARY: The Office of the Inspector 

General (OIG) proposes to add a system 

of records to its inventory of record 

systems subject to the Privacy Act of 

1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

DATES: The proposed action will be 

effective on September 6, 2006, unless 

comments are received that would 

result in a contrary determination. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Chief, 

FOIA/PA Office, Inspector General, 

Department of Defense, 400 Army Navy 

Drive, Room 201, Arlington, VA 22202–

4704. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Darryl R. Aaron at (703) 604–9785. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office 

of the Inspector General (OIG) systems 

of records notices subject to the Privacy 

Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 

amended, have been published in the 

Federal Register and are available from 

the address above. 

The proposed systems reports, as 

required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the 

Privacy Act, were submitted on (date), 

to the House Committee on Government 

Reform, the Senate Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs, and the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) pursuant to 

paragraph 4c of Appendix I to OMB 

Circular No. A–130, ‘‘Federal Agency 

Responsibilities for Maintaining 

Records About Individuals,’’ dated 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN07AU06.049</GPH>
§ 5.213 Time of operation. ( a ) Unless specified or restricted hours of operation are shown in the station authorization, broadcast experimental radio stations may be operated at any time and are not required to adhere to a regular schedule of operation.
( b ) The FCC may limit or restrict the periods of station operation in the event interference is caused to other broadcast or non-broadcast stations.
( c ) The FCC may require that a broadcast experimental radio station conduct such experiments as are deemed desirable and reasonable for development of the type of service for which the station was authorized.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-708 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EMPLOYMENT 

 Agreements Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BRAZIL Extending and Amending the 

Agreement of July 8, 1987, as 

Extended 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Brasilia July 6 and 8, 2005 

and 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Brasilia March 18 and 19, 2011 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 BRAZIL 

 Employment 

 Agreements extending and amending 

 the agreement of July 8, 1987, 

 as extended. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Brasilia 

 July 6 and 8, 2005; 

 Entered into force July 8, 2005. 

 And effected by exchange of notes at Brasilia 

 March 18 and 19, 2011; 

 Entered into force March 19, 2011. 






NOTE: The date of this note is March 19, 2011.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of VendingData Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Steven J. Blad, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John
R. Spina, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



By:         /s/ Steven J. Blad                         Dated:  March  27 , 2003
            ----------------------------------------
            Steven J. Blad
Title:      President and Chief Executive Officer

By:         /s/ John R. Spina                          Dated:  March  27, 2003
            ----------------------------------------
            John R. Spina
Title:      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

         This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
No. 11-1220.

#### Freedman et al. *v.*State Bar of Georgia.

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 150 (Friday, August 4, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44294-44295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6677]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of New Exposure Draft; Interpretation: Items Held for 
Remanufacture

    Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of 
Procedure, as amended in April, 2004,

[[Page 44295]]

notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory 
Board (FASAB) has issued an exposure draft, Interpretation: Items Held 
for Remanufacture.
    The proposed Interpretation would clarify the principles governing 
the classification, valuation and reporting of items that are in the 
process of major overhaul or remanufacture for sale or for internal 
use. The Exposure Draft is available on the FASAB home page http://www.fasab.gov/exposure.html. Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB 
at (202) 512-7350. Respondents are encouraged to comment on any party 
of the exposure draft.
    Written comments are requested by October 16, 2006, and should be 
sent to: Wendy M. Comes, Executive Director, Federal Accounting 
Standards Advisory Board. 441 G Street, NW., Suite 6814, Mail Stop 
6K17V, Washington, DC 20548.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy Comes, Executive Director, 441 G 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463.

    Dated: August 1, 2006.
Charles Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-6677 Filed 8-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Concierge Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, David Neibert, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  




October 23,

 2008

| |     |                                       
| | --- | --------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ DAVID NEIBERT                     
| |     | David Neibert,
Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Concierge Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Concierge Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-9201.

#### Hardrick *v.*Lafler, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.947 Modification of licenses. ( a ) All major modifications, as defined in § 1.929 of this part, require prior Commission approval. Applications for major modifications also shall be treated as new applications for determination of filing date, Public Notice, and petition to deny purposes.
( b ) Licensees may make minor modifications to station authorizations, as defined in § 1.929 (other than pro forma transfers and assignments), as a matter of right without prior Commission approval. Where other rules in this part permit licensees to make permissive changes to technical parameters without notifying the Commission (*e.g.,* adding, modifying, or deleting internal sites), no notification is required. For all other types of minor modifications (*e.g.,* name, email or physical mailing address, point of contact changes), licensees must notify the Commission by filing FCC Form 601 within thirty (30) days of implementing any such changes.
( c ) Multiple pending modification applications requesting changes to the same or related technical parameters on an authorization are not permitted. If a modification application is pending, any additional changes to the same or related technical parameters may be requested only in an amendment to the pending modification application.
( d ) Any proposed modification that requires a fee as set forth at part 1, subpart G, of this chapter must be filed in accordance with § 1.913.
[63 FR 68933, Dec. 14, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 53240, Oct. 1, 1999; 85 FR 85530, Dec. 29, 2020]
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Date: September 2, 2010

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Financial Officer
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-1119.5 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

Intellectual Property Rights 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

Effected by Exchange of Letters at 

Hanoi and Washington 

November 19, 2006 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

Trade: Intellectual Property Rights 

 Agreement effected by exchange of letters 

 at Hanoi and Washington November 19, 2006; 

 Entered into force November 19, 2006. 
NOTE: At present, we do not have an official translation of this letter. Once the official translation is obtained, it will be added to this publication.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Cotelligent, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-31914, 333-33312, 333-67589, 333-10253, and 333-3388) on Form S-8 and
in the registration statement (No. 333-53899) on Form S-4 of Cotelligent, Inc.,
of our report dated December 6, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Cotelligent, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 2001, and the nine months ended December 31, 2000,
which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K/A of
Cotelligent, Inc.

Our report dated December 6, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has restated the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31,
2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2001, and
the nine months ended December 31, 2000, which consolidated financial statements
were previously audited by other independent auditors who have ceased
operations.

                                             /s/ KPMG LLP


Costa Mesa, California
December 6, 2002
#### § 302-2.102 Who must authorize and approve relocation expenses?

The agency head or their designee must authorize and approve relocation expenses.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12254, Feb. 16, 2024]