alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 101.1429 Designated entities. ( a ) *Eligibility for small business provisions.* ( 1 ) A very small business is an entity that, together with its controlling interests and affiliates, has average annual gross revenues not exceeding $3 million for the preceding three years.
( 2 ) A small business is an entity that, together with its controlling interests and affiliates, has average annual gross revenues not exceeding $15 million for the preceding three years.
( 3 ) An entrepreneur is an entity that, together with its controlling interests and affiliates, has average annual gross revenues not exceeding $40 million for the preceding three years.
( b ) *Bidding credits.* A winning bidder that qualifies as a very small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of very small businesses may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(i) of this chapter. A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of small businesses may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(ii) of this chapter. A winning bidder that qualifies as an entrepreneur, as defined in this section, or a consortium of entrepreneurs may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(iii) of this chapter.
404 A.2d 1358

#### Commonwealth v. Clarke, Appellant.

Submitted April 10, 1978.

William F. Caruthers, for appellant; Louis H. Ceraso, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

SPAETH, J., concurred in the result.

JACOBS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Rowland Mosser, Principal Financial Officer of Veridigm, Inc.(the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Quarterly Report on 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  November 19, 2007  By:/s/ Rowland Mosser ------------------------------- Rowland Mosser, Principal Accounting Officer, and Director
EXHIBIT  99.1
                                  HIV-VAC, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2000, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Kevin  Murray,  the
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                                     /s/ Kevin Murray
                                                     ----------------
                                                     Kevin Murray
                                                     President and CEO


October 22, 2002









                                       19
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

KEITH ALEXANDER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 667 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### § 27.1131 Protection of part 101 operations.

All AWS licensees, prior to initiating operations from any base or fixed station, must coordinate their frequency usage with co-channel and adjacent-channel incumbent, 47 CFR part 101 fixed-point-to-point microwave licensees operating in the 2110-2150 MHz and 2160-2200 MHz bands. Coordination shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of § 24.237 of this chapter.

[79 FR 32414, June 4, 2014]
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
------
*99.1     Consent  of  Independent  Auditors.

                                                            Rutherford & Company
                                                           Chartered Accountants
                                                 9511 Bates Road, Richmond, B.C.
                                                                  CANADA V7A 1E3
                                      Telephone (604)272-5454  Fax (604)272-5874




                             ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT
                              --------------------


We  hereby  consent  to the use of our audit report of Prime Air, Inc. (Nevada),
dated  April  9,  2002,  for  the  years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 in the
Revised  Form  10K  SB  Statement  for  Prime  Air,  Inc.  (Nevada).

We also consent to the use of our auditing firm as experts in the Revised 10K SB
Registration  Statement  for  Prime  Air,  Inc.  (Nevada).




                                                        "Rutherford  &  Company"
Richmond,  Canada
April  9,  2002                                          CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS


                                       39
<PAGE>
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-619 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ENERGY 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FRANCE 

Signed at Washington June 19, 2012 

with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
FRANCE 

Energy 

 Agreement signed at Washington June 19, 2012; 

 Entered into force June 19, 2012. 

 With annex.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Concierge Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, David Neibert, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  October 14, 2008

| |     |                                       
| | --- | --------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ DAVID NEIBERT                     
| |     | David Neibert,
Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Concierge Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Concierge Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer
of ArthroCare Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



Date: February 14, 2011

By:

/s/DAVID FITZGERALD David Fitzgerald President and Chief Executive Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
§ 302-3.504 What information should we include in a service agreement? The service agreement should include, but not be limited to the following: ( a ) The employee's name;
( b ) The employee's effective date of transfer or appointment;
( c ) The employee's actual place of residence at the time of appointment;
( d ) The name of all dependents that are authorized to travel under the TA;
( e ) Detailed information regarding the employee's obligation to repay funds spent on the employee's relocation as a debt due the Government if the service agreement is violated;
( f ) The employee's agreed period of time (see § 302-3.505) to remain in service; and
( g ) The employee's signature accepting the terms of the agreement.
[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12254, Feb. 16, 2024]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SYED NAZIM ALI,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
PAYPAL, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 1 9

- 16479

D.C. No. 5:19

- cv

- 00093

- SVK

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan G. Van Keulen, Magistrate Judge, Presiding * *

Submitted May 4, 2020 * * *

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and TROTT , Circuit Judges.

Syed Nazim Ali appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his employment action alleging federal and state law claims

. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

* * * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 6 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 16479

Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 3 41 (9th Cir. 2010). We

affirm

. The district court properly dismissed Ali’s claims for disability
discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), failure to

accommodate and retaliation under the California Fair Employment Housing Act
(“FEHA”), wrongful termination , and intentional in fliction of emotional distress

because Ali failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. As
recognized by the district court, the email chain Ali attached to his operative

complaint reveals that PayPal reasonably accommodated to his requests by
providing him with a “desk for the duration of this contract”. See Ashcroft v.

Iqbal , 556 U.S. 66 2, 679 (2009) (a plaintiff fails to show he is entitled to relief if
the complaint’s factual allegations “do not permit the court to infer more than the
mere possibility of [the alleged] misconduct”) ; Dunlap v. Liberty Nat. Prods. , Inc. ,
878 F.3d 794 , 798

- 99 (9th Cir. 2017) (elements of an ADA disability

discrimination claim); Mamou v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.
, 81 Cal. Rptr. 3d 406
, 428 (Ct. App. 2008) (elements of a FEHA retaliation claim) ; Jensen v. Wells Fargo

Bank , 102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 55, 63 (Ct. App. 2000 ) (elements of a FEHA failure

- to

accommodate claim ); Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc. , 87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 487, 495 (Ct.

App. 1999) (“ The employer is not obligated to choose the best accommodation or
the accommodation the employee seeks.” ); Janken v. GM Hughes Elecs. , 53 Cal.3 19

- 16479

Rptr. 2d 741, 756 (Ct. App. 1996) (“A simple pleading of per sonnel management

activity is insufficient to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional
distress, even if improper motivation is alleged.” ).

Ali’s asse rtion of retaliation amount to no more tha n rank speculation not

supported by any material facts.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 200 9).

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439

 PETER R. MARKSTEINER CLERK’S OFFICE

 CLERK OF COURT 202-275-8000

January 2019

RESPONSE TO NOTICE TO ADVISE OF SCHEDULING CONFLICTS

Case Number

Case Name

Name of Arguing Counsel

Dates Unavailable

Please list up to ten days of unavailability 

within the specific sessions listed in the 

Notice of Scheduling Conflicts in this case. 

Attach a statement showing good 

cause for each listed day. Days listed 

without a supporting statement will not be 

considered in scheduling argument.

Potential Other Conflicts

Please list other pending cases where 

briefing is complete but oral argument has 

not yet been scheduled.

I certify the above information and any attached statement is accurate and 

complete. 

Date: _________________ Signature: _____________________________ 

* * * 

Filing Instructions and Additional Assistance

Please submit this form via CM/ECF using the event “Response to Notice to Advise 

of Scheduling Conflicts” by the due date and include the supporting statement and a 

certificate of service noting service on opposing counsel. The form must be flattened 

before filing in CM/ECF by printing it as a PDF and then saving the new file. 

If you need assistance, please contact the Court Services team at (202) 275-8035.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Access Coordinator - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2xmE8LhDkF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/oral-argument\/access-coordinator\/\">Access Coordinator<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/oral-argument\/access-coordinator\/embed\/#?secret=2xmE8LhDkF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Access Coordinator” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"2xmE8LhDkF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The federal judiciary provides sign language interpreters or other auxiliary aids and services to participants in court proceedings who are deaf, hearing-impaired, or have other communications disabilities.\u00a0 See The Guide for Judiciary Policy, vol. 5. \u00a7 255.40 (pdf). Access Coordinators John Paul, Interim Operations ManagerFrances M. McNulty, Chief Deputy Clerk 717 Madison Place, NW, Room […]"}
# Swedish National Defence College (SNDC), members, participate in a IT Capstone Exercise

/ Published May 11, 2012

On May 7-11, 2012, students from Swedish National Defence College (SNDC), located in Stockholm, Sweden, visited the NDU iCollege for an Information Operations and Information Assurance Capstone Exercise.  The exercise was led by Major General Anders Brannstrom, Deputy Director for Operations (J3).  Participants included:  Swedish military officers, government civilians, and the private sector.  NDU iCollege’s Dr. Dan Kuehl and Professor Mark Duke, both from the Cyber Integration and Information Operations Department, hosted the event.  The partnership between SNDC and the NDU iCollege has a long and vibrant history.  Students and faculty from both colleges annually participate in a world-wide teaching and student exchange in Washington and in Sweden.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bank Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Sue A. Gilman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                    
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Sue A. Gilman                                                  
|                      |  |     |  | Sue A. Gilman, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-07377) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-53400) pertaining to the Special Purpose Stock Option Plan, in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-73000) pertaining to the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-73002) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Option Plan, in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-152706) pertaining to the SPAR Group, Inc. 2008 Stock Compensation Plan and in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-72998) pertaining to the 2001 Consultant Stock Purchase Plan of SPAR Group, Inc. of our report dated April 15, 2010, with respect to the December 31, 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements and schedule of SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2009.




/s/ Rehmann Robson







Troy, Michigan


April 15, 2010
319P15

#### State v. Carlton Washington Tomlinson

1. Def’s Motion for Temporary Stay

1. Allowed 09/10/2015

2. Def’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*

3. Def's PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1016)

3.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Certifications****

 

I, James R. Lavelle, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cotelligent, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of Cotelligent, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether of not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 15, 2005