alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04399**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 04399\04399_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04399\04399_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04399\04399_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04399\04399_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04399\04399_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04399\Certification Statement Plant ID 04399.pdf Plant certification statement x 04399\Supplemental Documents\04399_MAP NS 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04399\Supplemental Documents\04399_WB 1 NS 2.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04399\Supplemental Documents\04399_WB 2 NS 2.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04399\04399_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04399\04399_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.2

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director
or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and
each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

                                                      /s/  Joel T. Allison
                                                      --------------------
                                                      Joel T. Allison
§ 25.161 Automatic termination of station authorization. A station authorization shall be automatically terminated in whole or in part without further notice to the licensee upon: ( a ) ( 1 ) The failure to meet an applicable milestone specified in § 25.164(a) or (b), if no authorized space station is functional in orbit;
( 2 ) The failure to meet an applicable milestone specified in § 25.164(b)(1) or (2), if at least one authorized space station is functional in an authorized orbit, which failure will result in the termination of authority for the space stations not in orbit as of the milestone date, but allow for technically identical replacements; or
( 3 ) The failure to meet any other milestone or construction requirement imposed as a condition of authorization. In the case of a space station authorization when at least one authorized space station is functional in orbit, however, such termination will be with respect to only the authorization for any space stations not in orbit as of the milestone date.
( b ) The expiration of the license term, unless, in the case of an earth station license, an application for renewal of the license has been filed with the Commission pursuant to § 25.121(e) or, in the case of a space station license, an application for extension of the license term has been filed with the Commission; or
( c ) The removal or modification of the facilities which renders the station not operational for more than 90 days, unless specific authority is requested.
( d ) The failure to maintain 50 percent of the maximum number of NGSO space stations authorized for service following the 9-year milestone period as functional space stations in authorized orbits, which failure will result in the termination of authority for the space stations not in orbit as of the date of noncompliance, but allow for technically identical replacements.
( e ) The failure to provide any SCS on all or some of the SCS authorized frequencies for more than 90 days. In this instance, the authorization will be terminated in whole or in part with respect to the relevant frequencies on which SCS has not been operational for more than 90 days in the United States, unless specific authority is requested.
[56 FR 24016, May 28, 1991, as amended at 68 FR 51507, Aug. 27, 2003; 78 FR 8425, Feb. 6, 2013; 79 FR 8320, Feb. 12, 2014; 82 FR 59985, Dec. 18, 2017; 89 FR 34167, Apr. 30, 2024]
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re HDJ Construction, LLC

, * Original Mandamus Proceeding

No. 11

- 2 4

- 00 226

- C V * September 19 , 20 2 4

* Memorand um Opinion by Bailey , C.J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and Williams, J. )

This court has considered HDJ Construction, LLC’s motion to dismiss its

petition for writ of mandamus and concludes that the motion should be granted

.

Th erefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for writ of mandamus

is d ismissed

. We further dismiss any other pending motions as moot, and we also

withdraw our order dated August 19, 2024, staying the proceedings in the trial court.
#### § 22.379 RF exposure.

Licensees and manufacturers shall ensure compliance with the Commission's radio frequency exposure requirements in §§ 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. Applications for equipment authorization of mobile or portable devices operating under this section must contain a statement confirming compliance with these requirements. Technical information showing the basis for this statement must be submitted to the Commission upon request.

[85 FR 18150, Apr. 1, 2020]
276P15

#### In the Matter of the Foreclosure by Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC, Substitute Trustee of a Deed of Trust Executed by Julia Weskett Beasley, dated February 12, 2007 and recorded on February 16, 2007 in Book No. 1211 at Page 169 of the Carteret County Registry, North Carolina

Respondent’s (Julia Weskett Beasley) PDR under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-387)

Allowed
§ 14.4 Exemption for Small Entities. ( a ) A provider of advanced communications services or a manufacturer of equipment used for advanced communications services to which this part applies is exempt from the obligations of this part if such provider or manufacturer, at the start of the design of a product or service: ( 1 ) Qualifies as a business concern under 13 CFR 121.105; and
( 2 ) Together with its affiliates, as determined by 13 CFR 121.103, meets the relevant small business size standard established in 13 CFR 121.201 for the primary industry in which it is engaged as determined by 13 CFR 121.107.
( b ) A provider or manufacturer may claim this exemption as a defense in an enforcement proceeding pursuant to subpart D of this part, but is not otherwise required to seek such an affirmative determination from the Commission.
( c ) This exemption will expire no later than October 8, 2013.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.701 Show cause orders. ( a ) The Commission may commence any proceeding within its jurisdiction against any common carrier by serving upon the carrier an order to show cause. The order shall contain a statement of the particulars and matters concerning which the Commission is inquiring and the reasons for such action, and will call upon the carrier to appear before the Commission at a place and time therein stated and give evidence upon the matters specified in the order.
( b ) Any carrier upon whom an order has been served under this section shall file its answer within the time specified in the order. Such answer shall specifically and completely respond to all allegations and matters contained in the show cause order.
( c ) All papers filed by a carrier in a proceeding under this section shall conform with the specifications of §§ 1.49 and 1.50 and the subscription and verification requirements of § 1.52.
[28 FR 12450, Nov. 22, 1963, as amended at 36 FR 7423, Apr. 20, 1971]
| Exhibit 21.1 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|--------------|--------------------------------|

|   | Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|--------|--------------------------------|

| Company Name                                                                                    | Jurisdiction |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
| First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa (Formerly known as First Federal Savings Bank of Fort Dodge) | Federal      |
| First Federal Investment Services, Inc.                                                         | Iowa         |
| First Iowa Mortgage, Inc.                                                                       | Iowa         |
| First Iowa Title Services, Inc.                                                                 | Iowa         |
| Northridge Apartments Limited Partnership I                                                     | Iowa         |
| NC Properties, LLC                                                                              | Iowa         |
| Northridge Apartments Limited Partnership II                                                    | Iowa         |

----
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of LipidViro Tech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Thomas J. Howells, President and Chief Executive Officer and Shelley Goff, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:October 29, 2009By:/s/Thomas J. HowellsThomas J. Howells, President and Chief Executive Officer  Date:October 29, 2009By:/s/Shelley GoffShelley Goff, Treasurer
#### § 302-10.205 Are there any costs for preparation that are not allowed?

Yes, costs for preparing a mobile home located outside Alaska or CONUS for movement or the costs for resettling outside Alaska or CONUS are not allowed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
                  OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

         I, Steven A. Schumm, the Chief Administrative Officer and Interim Chief
Financial Officer of CC V Holdings, LLC and CC V Holdings Finance, Inc.
(collectively, the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:

            -  fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            -  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ Steven A. Schumm
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Steven A. Schumm
                                          Chief Administrative Officer and
                                          Interim Chief Financial Officer
                                          November 12, 2003
#### JAMES M. JONES and WIFE *v.*ELI TUTTLE.

*Wife as Go-plaintiff. Demurrer. Amendment.*

1. To entitle a wife to join .as a co-plaintiff with her husband there must be such allegations as show that she has an interest in the cause of action.

2. The court can allow an amendment to the declaration after a hearing on general demurrer.

3. When the misjoinder appears by the pleadings, advantage may be taken of it, by demurrer.

4. R. L. S. 907, amendment construed.

Heard on demurrer to the declaration, June Term, 1881, Powers, J., presiding. The court overruled the demurrer, and allowed the plaintiffs to amend their declaration. The action was general assumpsit; and the defendant was summoned “ to answer to Matilda J. Jones and James M. Jones, husband of said Matilda J., of, Ac.”

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Royce, Oh. J.

This cause was heard upon a general demurrer to the declaration. That there was a misjoinder of plaintiffs was apparent. To entitle a wife to join as a co-plaintiff with her husband, there must bo such allegations as show that she has an interest in the cause of action. It has been considered, since the case of *Weller et al.*v. Baker, 2 Wilson, 414, that when the wife joins as co-plaintiff with her husband, her interest in the cause of action must be expressly stated.

When the'misjoinder appears by the pleadings, advantage may be taken of it by demurrer *Weller et al.*v. Baker, *supra;*Chitty’s Pleadings 32; *Baird & Wife*v. *Fletcher,*50 Vt. 603. Hence the demurrer should have been sustained, and the judgment overruling it is reversed.

The defendant excepted to the ruling of the court allowing the plaintiff to amend his declaration. Sec. 907, R. L., we think, confers the power upon the court to allow any proper amendment of the declaration to be made, after a general demurrer to the *489declaration has been heard, and before the rendition of a final judgment. We have not been furnished with a copy of the amendment that the plaintiff was permitted to make,, but infer from the argument ’that it was by averring that the wife was the meritorious cause of action, or that she had an interest in the cause of action. It was settled in *Myers & Wife*v. *Lyon & Co.,*51 Vt. 272, that such amendments were proper to be allowed.

The exceptions to the ruling allowing 'the amendment to be made are overruled, and the cause remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16702]



[[Page 41063]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR00-6-000]


Chevron Pipeline Company; Notice of Request for Protective Order 
and for Limited Waiver of 18 CFR 348.2(e)

June 27, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 13, 2000, pursuant to 18 CFR part 348, 
Chevron Pipeline Company (Chevron) filed an application for authority 
to charge market-based rates on its two pipeline systems originating in 
El Paso, Texas. Pursuant to 18 CFR 388.112, Chevron requests 
confidential treatment of certain information contained in its 
application. Chevron states that the only information for which it is 
requesting confidential treatment is shipper information that Chevron 
is required by law not to disclose pursuant to Section 15(13) of the 
Interstate Commerce Act (ICA). Chevron maintains that it is not 
requesting confidential treatment of any of its own business 
information at this time. In addition, Chevron requests the expedited 
issuance of a protective order and limited waiver of 18 CFR 348.2(e)--
until the Commission issues the requested protective order--to govern 
the provision of the application containing the confidential 
information to other parties.
    According to Chevron, the proposed protective order encompasses 
both the provision of the confidential version of the application prior 
to any entity becoming a participant in this proceeding and the later 
provision of both Section 15(13) and other confidential information 
among participants, should that become necessary in this proceeding. 
Chevron contends that the proposed protective order limits access to 
Section 15(13) information to an entity's outside counsel and 
consultants.
    Any person desiring to comment or protest this request for a 
protective order and limited waiver should file the comment or protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. All such comments or protests must be filed by 
July 7, 2000. Comments or protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not make 
the person filing a party to the proceeding. Copies of this filing, 
including the request for a protective order are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16702 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■

■

★

● ●

●

●

★ ● ● ●

●
No. 11-9113.

#### Alexander *v.*Arizona.

Super. Ct. Ariz., County of Maricopa. Certiorari denied.
792 A.2d 1241

#### IN THE MATTER OF LAWRENCE S. COVEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

April 2, 2002.

ORDER

LAWRENCE S. COYEN of GREEN BROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LAWRENCE S. COVEN is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by LAWRENCE S. COVEN pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the *144Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Case Information - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7rCQis9ez3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/\">Case Information<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/embed\/#?secret=7rCQis9ez3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Case Information” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"7rCQis9ez3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Information relating to Federal Circuit cases can be found on these pages. Case Filings Case Records Electronic Filing Information Fee Schedules Filing Resources Mediation Opinions & Orders"}
§ 301-73.301 How do we obtain travel payment system services? You may participate in GSA's or another Federal agency's travel payment system services program or you may contract directly with a travel payment system service if your agency has contracting authority and you are not a mandatory user of GSA's charge card program. Note to § 301-73.301 :
Under the new GSA charge card program effective November 30, 1998, it will be your responsibility to select the vendor that will be most beneficial to your agency's travel and transportation needs.