alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to 4/11/2015 Request for Section 333 Exem ption Photography

July 23, 2015 by/for Dan Skaggs HSEarchitects

To: Brenda Roberson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Please accept this amendment in response to your le tter of July 6, 2015.

Regarding information required under 11.81 (b) We are requesting exemption from the following sect ions of 14 CFR: §§ 61.113(a); 91.7(a); 91.119(c); 91.121; 91.151(a) (1) & (b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(1) an d (2); 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regu lations (14 CFR) allowing us to operate the UAS for the purpose of conducting aerial photography on archite ctural project and construction sites.

Allowing these requested exemptions would be in the public interest and have the following public benefits:
1) Use of UAS aircraft would allow a safe aerial v ideo inspection of building conditions to be conduc ted, which would not be feasible with the use of much la rger manned aircraft.
2) Use of UAS aircraft would allow a safe aerial vi deo inspection of building conditions to be conduct ed, without the use of larger construction grade (lifts , cranes, etc) equipment and personnel along with t heir elevated safety risk concerns.
3) Often we are faced with designing solutions for the repair and renovation of damaged existing buildings which requires exploratory inspection of damaged structures and roofs. The use of UAS in these scenarios would be of great benefit by reduci ng potential hazards of conducting inspections by use of personnel and equipment directly on these ex isting buildings.
4) Use of UAS aircraft would allow a safe aerial vi deo inspection of building conditions to be conduct ed, at less expense and with less potential constructio n intrusion that can affect the immediately surrounding neighborhood if large equipment is requ ired.
5) Use of UAS aircraft would allow a safe aerial ph otography of completed building projects, without t he use of larger photography equipment and/or manned a ircraft.

Thank you for your consideration,

Dan Skaggs, principal, HSEarchitects
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439

PETER R. MARKSTEINER CLERK’S OFFICE

CLERK OF COURT 202-275-8000

December 10, 2018

Revision to Process for Advising of Scheduling Conflicts

The court recently concluded a review of existing argument scheduling

practices with the objective of reducing the time between when a case 

becomes calendar-ready and is scheduled for oral argument. 

Based on this review, the court is implementing the following changes 

effective January 2, 2019.

1. The court will only consider scheduling conflicts by arguing 

counsel; non-arguing counsel and client conflicts will no longer 

be considered when scheduling argument.

2. Arguing counsel must provide an explanation, including a 

showing of good cause, for any submitted scheduling conflict. 

3. Arguing counsel will be limited to submitting only ten total days 

of unavailability during the six consecutive court weeks

identified in the Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts.

Submitting Conflicts Procedure. In filing the response to the 

Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts, arguing counsel will need to 

attach an explanation for each identified scheduling conflict. Conflicts 

submitted without a sufficient showing of good cause will not be 

considered by the court when scheduling argument.

A preview of the revised Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling 

Conflicts is available on the court’s website. Counsel will begin seeing 

the modified notices in mid-January.

For questions or comments on these changes, please contact the Court 

Services team at 202-275-8035.
No. 11-935.

#### Chamberlain *v.*Pennsylvania.

Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
§ 101.7 Eligibility for station license. ( a ) A station license may not be granted to or held by a foreign government or by a representative of a foreign government.
( b ) In the Common Carrier service, a station license may not be granted or held by: ( 1 ) Any alien or the representative of any alien;
( 2 ) Any corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government;
( 3 ) Any corporation of which more than one-fifth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by: Aliens or their representatives; a foreign government or representatives thereof; or any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country; or
( 4 ) Any corporation directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than one-fourth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens or their representatives, or by a foreign government or representative thereof, or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign government, if the Commission finds that the public interest will be served by the refusal or revocation of such license.
[61 FR 26677, May 28, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 55581, Oct. 28, 1996]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.7 Documents are filed upon receipt.

Unless otherwise provided in this Title, by Public Notice, or by decision of the Commission or of the Commission's staff acting on delegated authority, pleadings and other documents are considered to be filed with the Commission upon their receipt at the location designated by the Commission.

[60 FR 16055, Mar. 29, 1995]
<PAGE> 1


                                  Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greater Atlantic Financial
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Carroll E. Amos, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

A.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

B.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.





                                   By: /s/ Carroll E. Amos
                                   ------------------------
                                   Carroll E. Amos
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer


                                   Date:  February 13, 2003
§ 24.135 Frequency stability. ( a ) The frequency stability of the transmitter shall be maintained within ±0.0001 percent (±1 ppm) of the center frequency over a temperature variation of −30 °Celsius to + 50 °Celsius at normal supply voltage, and over a variation in the primary supply voltage of 85 percent to 115 percent of the rated supply voltage at a temperature of 20 °Celsius.
( b ) For battery operated equipment, the equipment tests shall be performed using a new battery without any further requirement to vary supply voltage.
( c ) It is acceptable for a transmitter to meet this frequency stability requirement over a narrower temperature range provided the transmitter ceases to function before it exceeds these frequency stability limits.
# Comments on: 2020-1289: The Chemours Company FC, LLC v. Daikin Industries, Ltd.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          39,268
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          15,111
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,723
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    586,234
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         237,743
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           239,447
<LOANS>                                      1,123,085
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,119,961
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,515,333
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,030
<LONG-TERM>                                    351,674
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,216
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,119,961
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 75,602
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,233
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                45,471
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               127,306
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              49,358
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,352
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           60,954
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      601
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 61,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,119
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      14,119
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,338
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.40
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,058
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,255
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,485
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      667
<RECOVERIES>                                       180
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,971
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,971
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Order entered November 18, 2020

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 00105

- CV

DEBORAH ANN MOON, Appellant

V.

CARL JOHN SCHEEF, III, Appellee

On Appeal from the 470 th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 470

- 55705

- 2018

ORDER

Befo re the Court is appellee’s November 17, 2020 second unopposed motion

for extension of time to file his brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the

brief be filed no later than December 21, 2020.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 150 (Friday, August 4, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44346-44347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Availability of Draft Written Reevaluation and Request 
for Comments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces the 
availability of a Draft Written Reevaluation of environmental impacts 
of a proposed centerfield taxiway at Boston-Logan International 
Airport, Boston, Massachusetts. FAA also announces that it will 
consider comments on the Draft Written Reevaluation until August 21, 
2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John C. Silva, Federal Aviation 
Administration, New England Region, Airports Division, ANE-600, 12 New 
England Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 2, 2002, FAA issued Record of 
Decision; Airside Improvements Planning Project; Logan International 
Airport; Boston, Massachusetts. This Record of Decision covered 
projects proposed by the Massachusetts Port Authority and 
environmentally assessed in an Environmental Impact Statement of the 
Airside Improvements Planning Project. FAA approved the following 
projects: (1) Construction and operation of unidirectional Runway 14-
32, (2) reconfiguration of the southwest corner taxiway system, (3) 
extension of Taxiway Delta, and (4) realignment of Taxiway November. 
FAA deferred a decision concerning the Centerfield Taxiway until FAA 
conducted an additional evaluation of potential beneficial operational 
procedures that would preserve or improve the operational and 
environmental benefits of the Centerfield Taxiway shown in the Final 
EIS. This additional evaluation was completed with the publication of 
Logan International Airport; Additional Taxiway Evaluation Report; Per 
FAA, August 2, 2002, Record of Decision; May 2006; and this draft 
written reevaluation. The taxiway evaluation report and Draft Written 
Reevaluation

[[Page 44347]]

are available on request (781-238-7602) or on FAA's public Web site 
(http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic). FAA is accepting comments on 
the Draft Written Reevaluation until August 21, 2006. Comments should 
be mailed to FAA at the above address under the heading: for further 
information contact. Questions may be directed to this address or by 
telephoning John Silva at 781-238-7602.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on July 6, 2006.
LaVerne F. Reid,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 06-6701 Filed 8-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 452

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on fresh cantaloupes imported

between January 1 and May 15 of each year.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1993

Mr. DE LA GARZA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on fresh cantaloupes imported between January 1 and May 15 of each

year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CANTALOUPES.

4 Subheading 9902.08.07 of the Harmonized Tariff

5 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking out

6 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/94’’.

7 SEC. 2. APPLICATION.

8 The amendment made by the first section of this Act

9 applies with respect to goods entered, released, or with10 drawn for consumption after December 31, 1992.
2

HR 452 IH

Æ
§ 301-72.3 What method of payment must we authorize for common carrier transportation? You must authorize one or more of the following as appropriate: ( a ) GSA's Government contractor-issued individually billed charge card(s);
( b ) Agency centrally billed or other established accounts;
( c ) Cash payments (personal funds or travel advances in the form of travelers checks or authorized ATM cash withdrawals) when the cost of transportation is less than $100, under § 301-51.100 of this chapter (cash may or may not be accepted by the carrier for the purchase of city pair fares); or
( d ) GTR(s) when no other option is available or feasible.
[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15976, Apr. 1, 1998; 63 FR 35538, June 30, 1998]
# AGENCY:

 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

 Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C., App. 2) notification is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development (ORD), Board of Scientific Counselors (BOSC), will hold an Executive Committee Meeting.

# DATES:

 The meeting will be held on February 9-10, 2000. On Wednesday, February 9, the meeting will begin at 9 a.m., and will recess at 4:30 p.m. On Thursday, February 10, the meeting will reconvene at 8:45 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 1 p.m. All times noted are Eastern Time.

# ADDRESSES:

 The meeting will be held at the Washington Monarch Hotel, 2401 M Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Shirley R. Hamilton, Designated Federal Officer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, NCERQA (MC 8701R), 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-6853.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                     Agenda items will include, but not limited to: Discussion on ORD's Particulate Matter                    2.5                     Research Program and BOSC subcommittee Draft Reports on Particulate Matter, and SAB and BOSC subcommittee Review of ORD's Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Program. Anyone desiring a draft BOSC agenda may fax their request to Shirley R. Hamilton, (202) 565-2444. The meeting is open to the public. Any member of the public wishing to make a presentation at the meeting should contact Shirley Hamilton, Designated Federal Officer, Office of Research and Development (8701R), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington , DC 20460; or by telephone at (202) 564-6853. In general, each individual making an oral presentation will be limited to a total of three minutes.                    Start Printed Page 3960

Dated: January 18, 2000.

John C. Puzak,

Acting Director, National Center for Environmental Research and Quality Assurance.

[FR Doc. 00-1665 Filed 1-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
EXHIBIT 32.1
TECHLABS, INC.
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Techlabs, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jayme
Dorrough, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:    May 18, 2007


         /s/ JAYME DORROUGH
         ------------------
         Jayme Dorrough
         Chief Executive and Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 427

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage

of annual screening mammography under part B of the Medicare program for women 65 years of age or older.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mrs. VUCANOVICH introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to

the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for coverage of annual screening mammography under

part B of the Medicare program for women 65 years

of age or older.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Access to An5 nual Mammography Screening Act of 1993’’.
2

HR 427 IH

1 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF ANNUAL SCREENING MAMMOG2 RAPHY FOR WOMEN AGE 65 OR OLDER.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8134(c)(2)(A) of the So4 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(c)(2)(A)), as added

5 by section 4163(b)(2) of the Omnibus Budget Reconcili6 ation Act of 1990, is amended—

7 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘but under 65

8 years of age,’’; and

9 (2) by striking clause (v).

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 subsection (a) shall apply to screening mammography per12 formed on or after January 1, 1994.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 31(b)**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT**

**        TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Cherry Cai, chief financial officer of Hendrx Corp. (“Registrant”) certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Registrant; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: May 11, 2006 

/s/ Cherry Cai

Cherry Cai 

Chief Financial Officer 

----