alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.27 Witnesses; right to counsel. Any individual compelled to appear in person in any Commission proceeding may be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel as provided in this section. (Regulations as to persons seeking voluntarily to appear and give evidence are set forth in § 1.225.) ( a ) Counsel may advise his client in confidence, either upon his own initiative or that of the witness, before, during, and after the conclusion of the proceeding.
( b ) Counsel for the witness will be permitted to make objections on the record, and to state briefly the basis for such objections, in connection with any examination of his client.
( c ) At the conclusion of the examination of his client, counsel may ask clarifying questions if in the judgment of the presiding officer such questioning is necessary or desirable in order to avoid ambiguity or incompleteness in the responses previously given.
( d ) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this section, counsel for the witness may not examine or cross-examine any witness, or offer documentary evidence, unless authorized by the Commission to do so.
(5 U.S.C. 555)
[29 FR 12775, Sept. 10, 1964]
No. 11-9808.

#### Lyttle *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________

GRETA D. CRAWFORD, Petitioner,

v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD , Respondent.

__________________________ 2012

- 3206

__________________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DE315H110384 -I- 1.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R Greta D. Crawford moves, inter alia, for her petition for review to be transferred to th e district court in light of Kloeckne r v. Solis , 133 S.Ct. 596 (2012). Case: 12-3206 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 08/16/2013GRETA CRAWFORD V

. MSPB 2

Upon consideration thereof , I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The Merit Systems Protection Board is directed to r espond no later than 14 days from the date of the filing of this order.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

s25 Case: 12-3206 Document: 24 Page: 2 Filed: 08/16/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-KSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             78
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          2,718
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    28,869
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                        30,980
<ALLOWANCE>                                       270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 64,826
<DEPOSITS>                                     32,081
<SHORT-TERM>                                   10,900
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 0
<LONG-TERM>                                     8,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          106
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 64,826
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 2,359
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               1,885
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  106
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                4,350
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              1,584
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,532
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           1,818
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (13)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 1,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   786
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        786
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      559
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.70
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.94
<LOANS-NON>                                        62
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  249
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      21
<RECOVERIES>                                       42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 270
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              270
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP97-375-012]

Take notice that on June 23, 2000, Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd. (WIC) tendered for filing as part if its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 2, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, to become effective on the dates indicated on each sheet.

WIC asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Commission's order issued October 13, 1999 in Docket No. RP97-375.

Specifically, this filing documents transportation rates for the periods December 1, 1997 through December 31, 1999 and incorporates changes made pursuant to the Commission's order to WIC's interest tracker, Columbia Exit Fee and negotiated rate and interruptible service revenue crediting provisions.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary,

[FR Doc. 00-16996 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 302-3.314 Is there a time limit when I must begin my travel and transportation upon separation? Yes, all travel and transportation of household goods must begin no later than six months after: ( a ) Your date of separation; or
( b ) The date of death of the employee who died before separation.
334P15

#### Ashley Keith Pittman, and wife, Deanna Pittman v. Henry Moncure Motors, Inc., Mobile Home Sales, a Corporation, and Crestline Homes, Inc., a Corporation

Def’s (Henry Moncure Motors, Inc.) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1186)

Denied
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ADALBERTO RAMOS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D23-116

[March 23, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Frank Ledee, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 08-2567CF10A.

Adalberto Ramos, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN, and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1231 

CA 11-01072 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ. 

 

JOAN M. DOMIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT 

AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF CHRISTIAN KATHERINE 

DOMIN, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

STARPOINT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

LAW OFFICE OF J. MICHAEL HAYES, BUFFALO (J. MICHAEL HAYES OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

BAXTER SMITH & SHAPIRO, P.C., WEST SENECA (LOUIS B. DINGELDEY, JR., OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County

(Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered November 29, 2010 in a personal

injury action. The order granted the motion of defendant for summary

judgment dismissing the complaint. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
1st Bergen Bancorp, Inc.:


     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of 1st Bergen Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated February 2, 1998,
relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of 1st Bergen
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which appears in
the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of 1st Bergen Bancorp, Inc.

                                             KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Short Hills, New Jersey
March 30, 1998
No. 10-11272.

#### Paul C. *v.*Nebraska.

Ct. App. Neb. Certio-rari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2020-1472: Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC v. Ford Motor Company - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Bvy1bnuotA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-10-2020-2020-1472-ethanol-boosting-systems-llc-v-ford-motor-company-audio-uploaded\/\">2020-1472: Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC v. Ford Motor Company<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-10-2020-2020-1472-ethanol-boosting-systems-llc-v-ford-motor-company-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=Bvy1bnuotA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2020-1472: Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC v. Ford Motor Company” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Bvy1bnuotA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC v. Ford Motor Company (mp3) Appeal Number: 2020-1472 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-40148, 333-45002, 333-85304, and 333-108246) of Connetics Corporation and in the relatedProspectuses, and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-46562, 333-58146, 333-61558,333-82468, 333-85302, 333-102619, 333-112614 and 333-125983) pertaining to the 1995 Employee StockPurchase Plan, Stock Plan (2000), 2000 Non-Officer Employee Stock Plan, International StockIncentive Plan, 1995 Directors’ Stock Option Plan and 2002 Employee Stock Plan of ConneticsCorporation, of our reports dated March 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Connetics Corporation, Connetics Corporation management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Connetics Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPPalo Alto, CaliforniaMarch 10, 2006
No. 11-5216.

#### Felder *v.*Indiana.

Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                                   THE BYLAWS
                                       OF
                               CYLINK CORPORATION
                            a California Corporation


         The undersigned, Robert B. Fougner, hereby certifies:

         1.  That  he is  the  duly  elected  and  acting  Secretary  of  Cylink
Corporation, a California corporation (the "Corporation").

         2. That effective  October 26, 1995,  Section 3.2 of the  Corporation's
Bylaws was amended to read as follows:

                  "The number of directors of the corporation  shall be not less
                  than  seven  (7) nor more  than  nine  (9)  until  changed  by
                  amendment  of the  Articles  of  Incorporation  or by a  Bylaw
                  amending  this Section 3.2 duly adopted by the vote or written
                  consent of holders of a majority  of the  outstanding  shares,
                  provided  that if the minimum  number of directors is five (5)
                  or  more,  any  proposal  to  reduce  the  minimum  number  of
                  directors  to a number less then five (5) cannot be adopted if
                  the votes cast  against  its  adoption  at a  meeting,  or the
                  shares  not  consenting  in the  case  of  action  by  written
                  consent, are equal to more than sixteen and two-thirds percent
                  (16-2/3%)  of the  outstanding  shares  entitled to vote.  The
                  exact  number of  directors  shall be fixed from time to time,
                  within the limits  specified in the Articles of  Incorporation
                  in this Section 3.2, by a resolution  duly adopted by the vote
                  of a majority of the shares entitled to vote  represented at a
                  duly  held  meeting  at which a quorum is  present,  or by the
                  written   consent  of  the   holders  of  a  majority  of  the
                  outstanding  shares  entitled  to  vote,  or by the  Board  of
                  Directors.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has set his hand hereto this 26th
day of March, 1997.

                                         /s/ Robert B. Fougner
                                         --------------------------
                                         Robert B. Fougner
                                         Secretary
# Comments on: 2018-1132: Uniloc USA, Inc. v. ADP, LLC
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 440 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 440

To impose a 10-year moratorium on oil and gas leasing in certain areas 
                      off the coast of New Jersey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Zimmer (for himself, Mr. Gallo, Mr. Andrews of New Jersey, Mrs. 
   Roukema, and Mr. Saxton) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To impose a 10-year moratorium on oil and gas leasing in certain areas 
                      off the coast of New Jersey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MORATORIUM ON OIL AND GAS LEASING.

    During the period described in section 2, the Secretary of the 
Interior may not--
            (1) prepare for, or conduct, any preleasing or leasing 
        activity (including, but not limited to, calls for information, 
        tract selection, notices of sale, receipt of bids, and award of 
        leases);
            (2) approve any plan of exploration pursuant to section 11 
        of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1340); or
            (3) approve any development or production plan pursuant to 
        section 25 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
        1351),
for any land within protraction diagram NK 18-12, NJ 18-2, NJ 18-3, NJ 
18-5, NJ 18-6, or NJ 19-1, which is within ``sale 121-area 
identification'' as depicted on the map entitled ``Mid-Atlantic 
Planning Area'' and numbered MMS-11.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM PERIOD.

    The period referred to in section 1 is the 10-year period which 
begins on the date of enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### § 22.565 Transmitting power limits.

The transmitting power of base, mobile and fixed transmitters operating on the channels listed in § 22.561 must not exceed the limits in this section.

(a) *Maximum ERP.* The effective radiated power (ERP) of base and fixed transmitters must not exceed the applicable limits in this paragraph under any circumstances.

| Frequency range (MHz) | Maximum ERP (watts) |
| --- | --- |
| 152-153 | 1400 |
| 157-159 | 150 |
| 454-455 | 3500 |
| 459-460 | 150 |

(b) *Basic power limit.* Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the ERP of base transmitters must not exceed 500 Watts.

(c) *Height-power limits.* Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the ERP of base transmitters must not exceed the amount that would result in an average distance to the service contour of 41.6 kilometers (26 miles) for VHF channels or 30.7 kilometers (19 miles) for UHF channels. The average distance to the service contour is calculated by taking the arithmetic mean of the distances determined using the procedures specified in § 22.567 for the eight cardinal radial directions, excluding cardinal radial directions for which 90% or more of the distance so calculated is over water.

(d) *Encompassed interfering contour areas.* Base transmitters are exempt from the basic power and height-power limits of this section if the area within their interfering contours is totally encompassed by the interfering contours of operating co-channel based transmitters controlled by the same licensee. For the purpose of this paragraph, operating transmitters are authorized transmitters that are providing service to subscribers.

(e) *Adjacent channel protection.* The ERP of base and fixed transmitters must not exceed 500 Watts if they transmit on channel 454.025 MHz and are located less than 7 kilometers (4.3 miles) from any Private Radio Services station receiving on adjacent channel 454.0000 MHz.

(f) *Mobile transmitters.* The transmitter output power of mobile transmitters must not exceed 60 watts.

[59 FR 59507, Nov. 17, 1994, as amended at 70 FR 19309, Apr. 13, 2005]
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1067 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM034AD

SBF100 - 33 - 023 --- 7/5/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            9488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       9488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 27096
<PP&E>                                          (4278)
<DEPRECIATION>                                   40817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   54397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      43467
<COMMON>                                       (57047)
<OTHER-SE>                                       40817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            23182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (23132)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (23132)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (23132)
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>