alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form, Revision 2.5 Page 1 of 1

1/15/10

AD Title: Trent 800 Critical Part Lives

Docket No. FAA-2010-0755 Directorate Identifier: 2010-NE-12-AD

Costs:

Costs per Product (e.g., engine, propeller)

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

WorkhoursLabor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Replace life limited 

parts. $ 0.00 45,000 $45,000.00 16 $720,000

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $720,000

Costs covered under warranty

Special considerations for Economic Analysis:

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES explain below NO 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES explain below NO 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES explain below NO 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES explain below NO 

Explanation:
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 2.921 Hearing on application.

Whenever it is determined that an application for equipment authorization presents substantial factual questions relating to the qualifications of the applicant or the equipment (or the effects of the use thereof), the Commission may designate the application for hearing. A hearing on an application for an equipment authorization shall be conducted in the same manner as a hearing on a radio station application as set out in subpart B of part 1 of this chapter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1181 Authority to prescribe and collect fees for competitive bidding-related services and products.

Authority to prescribe, impose, and collect fees for expenses incurred by the government is governed by the Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1952, as amended, 31 U.S.C. 9701, which authorizes agencies to prescribe regulations that establish charges for the provision of government services and products. Under this authority, the Federal Communications Commission may prescribe and collect fees for competitive bidding-related services and products as specified in § 1.1182.

[60 FR 38280, July 26, 1995]
Exhibit 23 (b)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements No. 333-33214, No. 333-47824, and No. 333-136863 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 15, 2005, relating to the statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows and
financial statement schedule of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|                             
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP    
|Columbus, Ohio March 29, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4474 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4474

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to require the performance 
    of the debtor's obligations under an unexpired lease of certain 
personal property until such lease is assumed or rejected under section 
                           365 of such title.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 1994

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 11 of the United States Code to require the performance 
    of the debtor's obligations under an unexpired lease of certain 
personal property until such lease is assumed or rejected under section 
                           365 of such title.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equipment Leasing, Maintenance, and 
Payment Amendment of 1994''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    The first sentence of section 365(d)(3) of title 11, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting ``, and in a case under chapter 11 of 
this title under any unexpired lease of personal property (other than 
personal property relating to residential real property),'' after 
``property''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendment made by section 2 shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by section 2 
shall not apply with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the 
United States Code before the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1





                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                         ------------------------------

                           Advanced Rx Services, Inc.                    
                     Cheshire Long Term Care Pharmacy, Inc.              
                          HLF Adult Home Pharmacy Corp.                  
                          IV-A-Care of Wisconsin, Inc.                   
                             Kinetic Services, Inc.                      
                             Look Drug Stores, Inc.                      
                            Loomis Enterprises, Inc.                     
                       Management & Network Services, Inc.               
                      Marlowe Nursing Center Services L.P.
                                Medi Centre, Inc.                        
                              NCS Daven Drug, Inc.                       
                        NCS HealthCare of Arkansas, Inc.                 
                       NCS HealthCare of California, Inc.                
                         NCS HealthCare of Florida, Inc.                 
                        NCS HealthCare of Illinois, Inc.                 
                         NCS HealthCare of Indiana, Inc.                 
                          NCS HealthCare of Iowa, Inc.                   
                         NCS HealthCare of Kansas, Inc.                  
                        NCS HealthCare of Kentucky, Inc.                 
                        NCS HealthCare of Maryland, Inc.                 
                        NCS HealthCare of Michigan, Inc.                 
                         NCS HealthCare of Modesto, Inc.                 
                          NCS HealthCare of Ohio, Inc.                   
                        NCS HealthCare of Oklahoma, Inc.                 
                         NCS HealthCare of Oregon, Inc.                  
                       NCS HealthCare of Pennsylvania, Inc.               
                     NCS HealthCare of South Carolina, Inc.
                         NCS HealthCare of Vermont, Inc.                 
                       NCS HealthCare of Washington, Inc.               
                         NCS Quality Care Pharmacy, Inc.                 
                               NCS Services, Inc.                        
                               NCS Unlimited, Inc.                       
                           Rescot Systems Group, Inc.                    
                          Thrifty Medical Supply, Inc.                
                    Uni-Care Health Services of Maine, Inc.             
                         Uni-Care Health Services, Inc.                  
      


                                     E-4
#### § 101.1007 Geographic service areas and number of licenses.

LMDS service areas are Basic Trading Areas (BTAs) as defined in the Rand McNally 1992 Commercial Atlas & Marketing Guide, 123rd Edition, at pages 38-39, that identifies 487 BTAs based on the 50 States and as defined to include the BTA-like areas of the United States Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, Mayaguez/Aguadilla-Ponce, Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, and the Commonwealth of Northern Marinas, for a total of 493 BTAs.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"20-1754: ORLOSKI v. HHS [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0t4XKpXwjL\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/1-14-2021-20-1754-orloski-v-hhs-opinion-20-1754-opinion-1-14-2021_1717521\/\">20-1754: ORLOSKI v. HHS [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/1-14-2021-20-1754-orloski-v-hhs-opinion-20-1754-opinion-1-14-2021_1717521\/embed\/#?secret=0t4XKpXwjL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“20-1754: ORLOSKI v. HHS [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"0t4XKpXwjL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: ORLOSKI v. HHS [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 20-1754 Origin: CFC Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with Bancshares of Florida, Inc.s (Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 (Report), I certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the period ended
June 30, 2005.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 1, 2005



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ DAVID G. WALLACE                    
|David G. Wallace Chief Financial Officer



42
Exhibit 32.2



Section 1350

CERTIFICATION



The undersigned officer hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation for the quarter ended March 27, 2005 as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE Corporation.



Signed May 4, 2005.



/s/ Harry V. Maccarrone

---

Harry V. Maccarrone,

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



24
#### § 18.305 Field strength limits.

(a) ISM equipment operating on a frequency specified in [§ 18.301](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-18.301) is permitted unlimited radiated energy in the band specified for that frequency.

(b) The field strength levels of emissions which lie outside the bands specified in [§ 18.301](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-18.301), unless otherwise indicated, shall not exceed the following:

| Equipment | Operating frequency | RF Power generated by equipment (watts) | Field strength limit (uV/m) | Distance (meters) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Any type unless otherwise specified (miscellaneous) | Any ISM frequency | Below 500 500 or more | 25 25 × SQRT(power/500) | 300 1 300 |
| | Any non-ISM frequency | Below 500 500 or more | 15 15 × SQRT(power/500) | 300 1 300 |
| Industrial heaters and RF stabilized arc welders | On or below 5,725 MHz Above 5,725 MHz | Any Any | 10 (2) | 1,600 (2) |
| Medical diathermy | Any ISM frequency Any non-ISM frequency | Any Any | 25 15 | 300 300 |
| Ultrasonic | Below 490 kHz | Below 500 500 or more | 2,400/F(kHz) 2,400/F(kHz) × SQRT(power/500) | 300 3 300 |
| | 490 to 1,600 kHz Above 1,600 kHz | Any Any | 24,000/F(kHz) 15 | 30 30 |
| Induction cooking ranges | Below 90 kHz On or above 90 kHz | Any Any | 1,500 300 | 4 30 4 30 |
| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Field strength may not exceed 10 μV/m at 1600 meters. Consumer equipment operating below 1000 MHz is not permitted the increase in field strength otherwise permitted here for power over 500 watts. | | | | |
| 2 Reduced to the greatest extent possible. | | | | |
| 3 Field strength may not exceed 10 μV/m at 1600 meters. Consumer equipment is not permitted the increase in field strength otherwise permitted here for over 500 watts. | | | | |
| 4 Induction cooking ranges manufactured prior to February 1, 1980, shall be subject to the field strength limits for miscellaneous ISM equipment. | | | | |

(c) The field strength limits for RF lighting devices shall be the following:

| Frequency (MHz) | Field strength limit at 30 meters (μV/m) |
| --- | --- |
| Non-consumer equipment: | |
| 30-88 | 30 |
| 88-216 | 50 |
| 216-1000 | 70 |
| Consumer equipment: | |
| 30-88 | 10 |
| 88-216 | 15 |
| 216-1000 | 20 |

Notes

1. The tighter limit shall apply at the boundary between two frequency ranges.

2. Testing for compliance with these limits may be made at closer distances, provided a sufficient number of measurements are taken to plot the radiation pattern, to determine the major lobes of radiation, and to determine the expected field strength level at 30, 300, or 1600 meters. Alternatively, if measurements are made at only one closer fixed distance, then the permissible field strength limits shall be adjusted using 1/d as an attenuation factor.

[[50 FR 36070](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/50-FR-36070), Sept. 5, 1985, as amended at [51 FR 17970](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/51-FR-17970), May 16, 1986; [52 FR 43197](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/52-FR-43197), Nov. 10, 1987]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Notice of Upcoming Modifications to Clerk's Office Procedures - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VyIKG6DYUt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-upcoming-modifications-to-clerks-office-procedures\/\">Notice of Upcoming Modifications to Clerk’s Office Procedures<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-upcoming-modifications-to-clerks-office-procedures\/embed\/#?secret=VyIKG6DYUt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Upcoming Modifications to Clerk’s Office Procedures” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"VyIKG6DYUt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Effective October 1, 2020, the Clerk’s Office will be implementing several modifications to office procedures including finalizing electronic filing access for unrepresented parties and resuming public assistance by telephone.\u00a0 Details of these changes are outlined in the\u00a0Notice of Modification to Clerk’s Office Procedures (Sept. 24, 2020) (pdf)\u00a0and the\u00a0Notice of Implementation of Electronic Filing for Unrepresented […]"}
710 P.2d 646

#### The STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James VON SCHMIDT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15824.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Dec. 2, 1985.

James Yon Schmidt, pro se.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen. by Lynn E. Thomas, Sol. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Following a trial in the magistrate division of the district court, James Von Schmidt was found guilty of failing to obtain a motor vehicle operator’s license, of failing to register a motor vehicle, and of failing to maintain motor vehicle liability insurance. The judgment of conviction was affirmed by the district court. Von Schmidt has appealed the district court’s decision. He contends that Idaho’s licensing, registration and liability insurance statutes violate certain inherent or constitutional rights. Finding no such violation, we affirm.

Von Schmidt argues that as a self-professed “free man,” he is entitled to travel upon public highways unburdened by state regulation. He also contends that the constitutional right to travel is absolute, depriving the state of any authority to require a license, registration or insurance. We disagree.

Two previous decisions, *Gordon v. State,*108 Idaho 178, 697 P.2d 1192 (Ct.App.1985), and *State v. Gibson,*108 Idaho 202, 697 P.2d 1216 (Ct.App.1985), have discussed these general questions. In *Gordon v. State, supra,*we said, “Whether [the right to travel] is termed a right or a privilege, an individual’s ability to travel on public highways is ‘subject to reasonable regulation by the state in the exercise of its police power.’ ” *Id.*108 Idaho at 179, 697 P.2d at 1193, *quoting Adams v. City of Pocatello,*91 Idaho 99, 101, 416 P.2d 46, 48 (1966). The state’s authority to require drivers’ licenses and to require registration of vehicles are legitimate exercises of the police power. *Gordon v. State, supra.*The constitutionality of the Idaho Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act (MVSRA), requiring proof of liability insurance, also has been upheld by our Court. *See State v. Reed,*107 Idaho 162, 686 P.2d 842 (Ct.App.1984). We are not persuaded to overturn these precedents.

Accordingly, the district court’s decision is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1




Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (this “report”), of SPAR Group, Inc. (the “registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:




1.           The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.




/s/ Gary S. RaymondGary S. RaymondChief Executive OfficerApril 15, 2010









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.