alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                          EXHIBIT 21

                                    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



                                                           STATE OR OTHER
                                                           JURISDICTION OF                PERCENTAGE
                                                           INCORPORATION                  OWNERSHIP
                                                           -------------                  ---------
PARENT
------

<S>                                                        <C>                              <C>
Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.                                     Maryland                           --


SUBSIDIARY (1)
----------

The Patapsco Bank                                          Maryland                           100%


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE PATAPSCO BANK (1)
---------------------------------

PFSL Holding Corp.                                         Maryland                           100%

Prime Business Leasing                                     Maryland                           100%

Patapsco Financial Services, Inc.                          Maryland                           100%

----------------
(1)  The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements
     contained in the Annual Report to Stockholders attached hereto as Exhibit 13.

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.740 Review period for section 208 formal complaints not governed by section 208(b)(1) of the Act. ( a ) Except in extraordinary circumstances, final action on a formal complaint filed pursuant to section 208 of the Act, and not governed by section 208(b)(1), should be expected no later than 270 days from the date the complaint is filed with the Commission.
( b ) The Enforcement Bureau shall have the discretion to pause the 270-day review period in situations where actions outside the Commission's control are responsible for unreasonably delaying Commission review of a complaint referenced in paragraph (a) of this section.
[83 FR 44837, Sept. 4, 2018]
Department of Homeland Security 

Office of Inspector General 

CBP Needs To Improve the Monitoring 


of the Cash Collection Process 


OIG-09-105 September 2009
§ 302-11.202 What residence transaction expenses will my agency not pay? Your agency will not pay: ( a ) Any fees that have been inflated or are higher than normally imposed for similar services in the locality;
( b ) Broker fees or commissions paid in connection with the purchase of a home at the new official station;
( c ) Owner's title insurance policy, “record title” insurance policy, mortgage insurance or insurance against loss or damage of property and optional insurance paid for by you in connection with the purchase of a residence for your protection;
( d ) Interest on loans, points, and mortgage discounts;
( e ) Property taxes;
( f ) Operating or maintenance costs;
( g ) Any fee, cost, charge, or expense determined to be part of the finance charge under the Truth in Lending Act, Title I, Pub. L. 90-321, as amended, and Regulation Z issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (12 CFR part 226), unless specifically authorized in § 302-11.200;
( h ) Expenses that result from construction of a residence, except as provided in § 302-11.200(e)(10); and
( i ) Losses, see § 302-11.304.
§ 300-70.1 What are the requirements for reporting payments for employee travel, transportation, and relocation? Agencies (as defined in § 301-1.1 of this subtitle) must report total travel and transportation payments, including relocation, no later than November 30 of each year to GSA, as described in this part: ( a ) Specific information on reporting payments for temporary duty travel are in this subpart.
( b ) Specific information on reporting payments for employee relocation are in part 302-1 of this subtitle.
[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18335, Apr. 1, 2011, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2017-01, 83 FR 604, Jan. 5, 2018]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Listen to Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Qwptg5czyB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/oral-argument\/listen-to-oral-arguments\/\">Listen to Oral Arguments<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/oral-argument\/listen-to-oral-arguments\/embed\/#?secret=Qwptg5czyB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Listen to Oral Arguments” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Qwptg5czyB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Federal Circuit provides media and public access to the audio stream of each panel scheduled for argument during the court’s monthly sessions. The streaming audio feeds begin approximately 15 minutes before the start of the scheduled argument in each courtroom.  Recordings of all arguments will be posted on the court’s website after the conclusion [...]"}
No. 11-905.

#### WB, The Building Co., LLC *v.*El Destino, LP, et al.

Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Celebrating Women's History Month at the Federal Circuit - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RiTJwet3a0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/169077-2\/\">Celebrating Women’s History Month at the Federal Circuit<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/169077-2\/embed\/#?secret=RiTJwet3a0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Celebrating Women’s History Month at the Federal Circuit” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"RiTJwet3a0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"On Thursday, March 10, 2022, the Federal Circuit celebrated Women\u2019s History Month hosting an all-female judge panel to discuss their careers and personal history with court staff. ","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/FederalCircuitJudges-1024x656.jpg"}
EXHIBIT 10.1
                                   [AHP LOGO]

                       AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION
          FIVE GIRALDA FARMS, MADISON, NEW JERSEY 07940 (973) 660-5402

                                                               JACK M. O'CONNOR
                                                                  TREASURER

March 26, 1998

VIA FAX: (212) 270-6041
Ms. Nancy Mistretta
Managing Director
Chase Securities Inc.
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY  10017-2070

RE:   - $2,500,000,000 A Credit Agreement among American Home Products
        Corporation, AC Acquisition Holding Company, A.H. Robins Company,
        Incorporated, The Lender Parties Hereto and The Chase Manhattan Bank,
        as Agent, Dated as of September 9, 1994, as amended

      - $2,500,000,000 B Credit Agreement among American Home Products
        Corporation, AC Acquisition Holding Company, A.H. Robins Company, 
        Incorporated, The Lender Parties Hereto and The Chase Manhattan Bank, 
        as Agent, Dated as of September 9, 1994, as amended

Dear Ms. Mistretta:

In accordance with Section 2.5(a) of the referenced Credit Agreements, please
accept this letter as confirmation of American Home Products Corporation's
("AHP") decision to terminate the $2.5 billion, 364-day, A Credit Agreement in
its entirety and reduce the $2.5 billion, 5-year, B Credit Agreement to $2.0
billion, effective April 1, 1998.  Within the B Credit Agreement, please reduce
all of the banks' current commitment amounts by 20% in order to arrive at a
total commitment of $2.0 billion.

Please forward a confirmation of the revisions to the Credit Agreements to Mr.
Charles Malone at facsimile number (973) 660-6671 as soon as possible.

Very truly yours,



/s/ Jack M. O'Connor
Jack M. O'Connor
Treasurer

cc:   P. Ciocco (Chase - Agent Services)
      B. A. Lewin
      C. J. Malone
      M. C. White
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB OF JAGUAR INVESTMENTS, INC. FOR THE QUARTER AND
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1
<CURRENCY>                                          1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                             48
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   48
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     48
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             800
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                         1310
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2062)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1400)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2018-1979: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qHon1ZR5XI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-03-2018-2018-1979-huawei-technologies-co-ltd-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd-audio-uploaded\/\">2018-1979: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-03-2018-2018-1979-huawei-technologies-co-ltd-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=qHon1ZR5XI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2018-1979: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"qHon1ZR5XI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (mp3) Appeal Number: 2018-1979 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"19-1133: BIOGEN MA INC. v. EMD SERONO, INC. [ERRATA], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Zfm7Nx7V4l\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-20-2020-19-1133-biogen-ma-inc-v-emd-serono-inc-errata-19-1133-errata-11-20-2020_1688995\/\">19-1133: BIOGEN MA INC. v. EMD SERONO, INC. [ERRATA], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-20-2020-19-1133-biogen-ma-inc-v-emd-serono-inc-errata-19-1133-errata-11-20-2020_1688995\/embed\/#?secret=Zfm7Nx7V4l\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“19-1133: BIOGEN MA INC. v. EMD SERONO, INC. [ERRATA], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Zfm7Nx7V4l\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: BIOGEN MA INC. v. EMD SERONO, INC. [ERRATA](pdf) Appeal Number: 19-1133 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements (No. 333-33214, No. 333-47824, No. 333-136863 and No. 333-153772) on Form S-8 of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 20, 2009 relating to our audits of the consolidated financialstatements and the financial statement schedule, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/S/    MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Columbus, Ohio 

March 20, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bank of Florida Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Tracy L. Keegan, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                            
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Tracy L. Keegan        
|                     |  |     |  | Tracy L. Keegan,           
|                     |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer
#### §§ 24.416-24.429 [Reserved]
#### § 302-10.201 What is the mileage allowance when you transport a mobile home overland by a POV?

The mileage allowance when you transport a mobile home overland by other than commercial means (e.g., towed by a POV) is eleven cents per mile. This is in addition to the mileage allowance prescribed for driving the POV under part 302-4 of this chapter.
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 

CANADA GOOSE HOLDINGS INC. 

PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	Amount: C$63,576,003	  	Date: January 31, 2017

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the
undersigned, Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (the “Borrower”), incorporated under the laws of the province of British Columbia with its principal office and place of business at 250 Bowie Ave, Toronto, ON M6E 4Y2, PROMISES TO
PAY to or to the order of DTR LLC (the “Lender”), at the Lender’s principal offices or such other place as the Lender may designate, the principal amount of $63,576,003 in lawful money of Canada, without interest. 

The Borrower shall have the right and privilege of paying the whole or any portion of the principal amount of this Note from
time to time remaining unpaid and outstanding at any time or times. 
 The recording by the Lender in its accounts of
principal amounts owing by the Borrower and repayments shall, in the absence of manifest mathematical error, be prima facie evidence of the same; provided that the failure of the Lender to record the same shall not affect the obligation of
the Borrower to pay such amounts to the Lender. 
 The Borrower and all endorsers of this Note waive presentment for payment
and notice of non-payment and agree and consent to all extensions or renewals of this Note without notice. 
 This Note is
governed by, and will be interpreted and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Province of British Columbia and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein. The Borrower irrevocably attorns and submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of
the Ontario courts situated in the City of Vancouver, and waives objection to the venue of any proceeding in such court or that such court provides an inconvenient forum. 

[Signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Borrower has executed this Note. 

 

			
	CANADA GOOSE HOLDINGS INC.
		
	By:  	 	/s/ Ryan Cotton
		 	Authorized Signing Officer
		
	By:	 	/s/ Joshua Bekenstein
		 	Authorized Signing Officer