alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 145-17]


Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and Certain Related Acts

    By virtue of the authority vested in me by Delegation of Authority 
No. 145-5 of January 22, 1988, 53 FR 5072, pursuant to Executive Order 
12163 of September 29, 1971, 44 FR 56673, as amended, and the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq., State 
Department Delegation of Authority No. 145-5-2 of April 4, 1991, is 
hereby amended to read as follows:
    By virtue of the authority vested in me by Delegation of Authority 
No. 145-5 of January 22, 1988, 53 FR 5072, pursuant to Executive Order 
12163 of September 29, 1979, 44 FR 56673, as amended, and the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq., I hereby 
delegate to the Assistant Administrator for Latin America and the 
Caribbean of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) 
functions conferred on the President by section 534(b)(3)(A), (B), and 
(C) for the purpose of including law enforcement agencies and personnel 
in activities financed by USAID to strengthen the administration of 
justice. All such activities shall be implemented in coordination with 
the International Criminal Investigative Training Assistance Program of 
the U.S. Department of Justice.
    This delegation shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 13, 2000.

Peter F. Romero,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-17081 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-2069: TALEXMEDICAL, LLC v. BECON MEDICAL LIMITED [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0wwILeSe7o\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/07-22-2022-21-2069-talexmedical-llc-v-becon-medical-limited-opinion-21-2069-opinion-7-22-2022_1981627\/\">21-2069: TALEXMEDICAL, LLC v. BECON MEDICAL LIMITED [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/07-22-2022-21-2069-talexmedical-llc-v-becon-medical-limited-opinion-21-2069-opinion-7-22-2022_1981627\/embed\/#?secret=0wwILeSe7o\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-2069: TALEXMEDICAL, LLC v. BECON MEDICAL LIMITED [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"0wwILeSe7o\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: TALEXMEDICAL, LLC v. BECON MEDICAL LIMITED [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-2069 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         1082540
<NAME>                        CORBETT LAKE MINERALS, INC
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1
<CURRENCY>                                    US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1.000
<CASH>                                              5,152
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    6,652
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      6,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               2,884
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           12,000
<OTHER-SE>                                        (8,232)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        6,652
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   16,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       16,593
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.01)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4571 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4571

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 20 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States Post Office building located at 103-104 
   Estate Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, as the ``Wilbert 
                        Armstrong Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 103-104 Estate 
Richmond in Saint Croix, Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Wilbert Armstrong Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Wilbert Armstrong Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
p. 1



# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews

Document

Number: 

# 123 ) ll-E-8 3 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/20088:42:07

AM Sheet 123 of 264P. 2 Feb-17-9 7 01:43 P Creativ e Pultrusion s

. - ..,- . «.. * Mi«i»»_iu« . ICt S RT P N C p.oi

_ ©002/00 2 

### A 945 2

From : Date : Contact : Contac tRepor t Plasti e Composite s NESHA P Gre g LaFlam , Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) November ^ 199 6 Mr . Dav e Evan

s Company : Creativ e Pultrusions , Inc. , Roswell , N M Telephon e Number : (505)347-222 6
Contac tSummary : Calle d t o requestinformatio

n o n th e resi n mixin g an

d pultrusion operations a

tCreative Pulirpions ' Alu m Bank, P A facility . Ih e compan

y operate s 1 9 pultrusion line s a

tthe faciht

y (and*'/ line s a tRoswell) . Resi n i s store

d i n bul k a tth e Alu m Bank facility . Th e facility operates tw o mixers , whic h mi x 350-lobatcne s o f resin matri

x i n 55-gallo n drums . The mi x are a i s temperatur

e controlle d t

o &_["£• Mixing takes place fo r 1 1 t o 1 5 minutes wit

h n o cove r i n plac e (sinc e the y ar

e addin g matena l throughou

tth e mixin g process) . Afte r mixing , th e vesse l i s full y enclose d whil e i ti s taken to one o f th e pultrusio

n machines , an

d stay s covere d whil e matri x i a pumped into fac process . e<c c $+ -& 4,^_^ s ^^ -to Th e facilit

y utilize s ai

r curtain s aroun d th e we tarea s o f al l machines , an

d mi s measur

e ha s bee n demonstrate

d t o maintai

n a n ai r velocit y belo w 1 5 fee tper minute . Mr . Evan s sai d tha

t th e tren d i n th e industr

y i s t o us e direc

tdi e injection wher

e i ti s possibl e (onl y certai n profile s ca n b e mad e successfull y usin g thi s proces s variation) . Th e Alum Ban

k facilit y use s som e direc

t di e injectio n an

d som e prefor

m resi n injection , bu

tther e ar e stil l som e bug s i n thes e approache s (hig h leakage. , etc.) .

REPOR T I S ACCURA '



## ns cof*e<Ac<\
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Date: September 2, 2010

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4520

To amend chapter 11 of title 31, United States Code, to require that the

President’s budget submission separately reflect the budget aggregates

relating to activities within the unified budget and aggregates relating

to activities required by law to be excluded from the unified budget.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1994

Ms. MARGOLIES-MEZVINSKY (for herself, Mr. PENNY, Mr. COX, and Mr.

PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Operations

A BILL

To amend chapter 11 of title 31, United States Code, to

require that the President’s budget submission separately

reflect the budget aggregates relating to activities within

the unified budget and aggregates relating to activities

required by law to be excluded from the unified budget.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. THE PRESIDENT’S BUDGET.

4 Section 1105 of chapter 11 of title 31, United States

5 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

6 subsection:
2

•HR 4520 IH

1 ‘‘(g) The budget transmitted pursuant to subsection

2 (a) for a fiscal year shall set forth all budget aggregates

3 (including receipts, disbursements, and deficits) only as

4 follows: One set of aggregates shall relate solely to activi5 ties of the Federal budget which are within the unified

6 budget and one set of aggregates shall relate solely to ac7 tivities of the Federal budget which are off-budget.’’.

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 The amendment made by section 1 shall become ef10 fective for fiscal year 1996 and shall be fully reflected in

11 the fiscal year 1996 budget submitted by the President

12 in February 1995 as required by section 1105(a) of title

13 31, United States Code.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Reclamation

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-463). Following consultation with the General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) is renewing the charter for the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group. The purpose of the Adaptive Management Work Group is to advise and provide recommendations to the Secretary with respect to responsibility to comply with the Grand Canyon Protection Act of October 30, 1992, embodied in Public Law 102-575.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda Whetton, 801-524-3880.

The certification of renewal is published below.

## Certification

I hereby certify that renewal of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group is in the public interest in connection with the purpose of duties imposed on the Department of the Interior by 30 U.S.C. 1-8.

Dated: July 19, 2006.

Dirk Kempthorne,

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 06-6659 Filed 8-2-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.729 Motions. ( a ) A request for a Commission order shall be by written motion, stating with particularity the grounds and authority therefor, including any supporting legal analysis, and setting forth the relief sought.
( b ) Motions to compel discovery must contain a certification by the moving party that a good faith attempt to resolve the dispute was made prior to filing the motion.
( c ) Motions seeking an order that the allegations in the complaint be made more definite and certain are prohibited.
( d ) Motions to dismiss all or part of a complaint are permitted. The filing of a motion to dismiss does not suspend any other filing deadlines under the Commission's rules, unless staff issues an order suspending such deadlines.
( e ) Oppositions to motions shall be filed and served within 5 business days after the motion is served. Oppositions shall be limited to the specific issues and allegations contained in the motion; when a motion is incorporated in an answer to a complaint, the opposition to such motion shall not address any issues presented in the answer that are not also specifically raised in the motion. Failure to oppose any motion may constitute grounds for granting the motion.
( f ) No reply may be filed to an opposition to a motion, except under direction of Commission staff.
[83 FR 44832, Sept. 4, 2018]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rhonda Underwood (202) 314-6065.                               ( print page 41510)                            Individuals requesting specific accommodation should contact Mrs. Barbara Bush at (202) 314-6220 by Friday, July 7, 2000.                    

Dated: June 30, 2000.

Rhonda Underwood,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-17124  Filed 6-30-00; 3:26 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 -73

37 38 39 40


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/26 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.48 N 77.37 WMeters AGL
### Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment Costs:

Equipment Shipping Costs

This attachment to the supplement cost document provides EPA's communication with a vendor

regarding dry cargo van shipping costs for chemical precipitation treatment equipment used in

the Steam Electric cost model.Project No.: 0172. 08 .02 9 .0 4 4 DISTRIBUTION

Page _ 1 _ of __ 1

_

Project Name: Steam /Cost/Compliance Modeling

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 06/28 / 2011 Time: 8 :15 a m EST

Company Name: FreightCenter.com Contact Name: Robert Clark

Phone No.: (800) 716

- 7608 ext. 1110

Email address: RClark@freightcenter.com

Name: Kavya Kasturi ERG

GENERAL SUBJECT: Vendor cost request for chemical freight costs

– dry van truck

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On June 28 , 20 1 1 at 8 :15 a m I contacted Mr. Robert Clark . I explained to M r

. Clark that we are

working on conceptual level costing of a chemical precipitation wastewater treatment system to

treat FGD (flue gas desulfurization) wastewater fr om steam electric power plants

, and a s a part

of this project we are trying to collect cost information on different components or units of a

chemical precipitat ion system

. Chemicals are required for the treatment system and we are

seeking cost information for chemical shipping.

I spoke to Mr. Clark about the chemicals that would require shipping for a chemical precipitation

system. Mr. Clark indicated that costs would vary depending on a number of factors, including

whether a full truckload or partial truckload would be required. Mr. Clark stated that the freight

cost does not differ depending on whether the chemicals shipped are liquid or solid. The

chemicals could be shipped via totes or bags per pallet. A typical pallet is 4 feet by 40 inches and

cannot be stacked more than 8 feet high.

Mr. Clark stated that a standard dry van truck could be either 48 or 52

- 53 feet long, 8 feet wide,

and 9 feet high and coul d carry up to 45,000 lbs of material. A dry van truck can hold up to 30

pallets. Mr. Clark stated the approximate cost for shipping a full dry van truck load approximately

5 00 miles would be $1,400.
No. 11-5096.

#### Watford *v.*Stevenson, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 211.3 Scope and coverage. ( a ) The priority system and procedures established by this part are applicable to: ( 1 ) U.S. domestic leased intercity private line services, including private line switched network services;
( 2 ) U.S. international leased private line services to the point of foreign entry;
( 3 ) Foreign extensions of U.S. international leased private line services to the extent possible through agreement between U.S. carriers and foreign correspondents;
( 4 ) International leased private line services terminating in or transiting the United States;
( 5 ) Federal Government-owned and leased circuits.
( b ) The priority system and procedures established by this part are not applicable to operational circuits or order wires of the carriers needed for circuit reactivation and maintenance purposes, which shall have priority of restoration over all other circuits and shall be exempt from interruption for the purpose of restoring priority services.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greater Atlantic Financial Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David E. Ritter Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

A.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

B.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                                            By: /s/ David E. Ritter
                                                -------------------
                                                David E. Ritter
                                                Senior Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer


                                                Date: May 13, 2005