alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 2.964 Pre-approval guidance procedure for Telecommunication Certification Bodies. ( a ) The Commission will publish a “Pre-approval Guidance List” identifying the categories of equipment or types of testing for which Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs) must request guidance from the Commission before approving equipment on the list.
( b ) TCBs shall use the following procedure for approving equipment on the Commission's pre-approval guidance list. ( 1 ) A TCB shall perform an initial review of the application and determine the issues that require guidance from the Commission. The TCB shall electronically submit the relevant exhibits to the Commission along with a specific description of the pertinent issues.
( 2 ) The TCB shall complete the review of the application in accordance with the Commission's guidance.
( 3 ) The Commission may request and test a sample of the equipment before the application can be granted.
( 4 ) The TCB shall electronically submit the application and all exhibits to the Commission along with a request to grant the application.
( 5 ) The Commission will give its concurrence for the TCB to grant the application if it determines that the equipment complies with the rules. The Commission will advise the TCB if additional information or equipment testing is required, or if the equipment cannot be certified because it does not comply with the Commission's rules.
[80 FR 33445, June 12, 2015]
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with Bancshares of Florida, Inc.s (Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 (Report), I certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the period ended,
September 30, 2003.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 13, 2003



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|/s/    THOMAS M. WHELAN                 
|                                        
|Thomas M. Whelan Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1840 Employment.

No qualified individual with a disability shall, on the basis of disability, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the Commission. The definitions, requirements and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 791, as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR parts 1614 and 1630, as well as the procedures set forth in the Basic Negotiated Agreement Between the Federal Communications Commission and National Treasury Employees Union, as amended, and Subchapter III of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. 7121(d), shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.

[76 FR 70909, Nov. 16, 2011]
No. 11-9484.

#### Hill *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41650-41651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17003]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-355-000]


Trailblazer Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Change in FERC 
Gas Tariff

June 29, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 26, 2000 Trailblazer Pipeline Company 
(Trailblazer) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, certain tariff sheets to be effective March 27, 
2000.
    Trailblazer states that on February 9, 2000, the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) issued its final rule regarding the 
regulation of short-term interstate natural gas transportation services 
in Docket Nos. RM98-10-000 and RM98-12-000 (Order No. 637). In the 
instant filing, Trailblazer is filing to implement provisions of Order 
No. 637 regarding the waiver of the rate ceiling for short-term 
capacity release transactions.
    Trailblazer states that Order No 637 provides for a waiver of the 
rate ceiling for short-term (less than one year) capacity release 
transactions until September 30, 2002, and requires pipeline to file 
tariff revisions within 180 days of the effective date of the rule, 
i.e., March 27, 2000, to remove tariff provisions which are 
inconsistent with the removal of the rate ceiling. Accordingly, 
Trailblazer is filing revised tariff sheets as required. Trailblazer 
states that its Order No. 637 compliance plan is not due until August 
15, 2000. Therefore, if Trailblazer were to wait until its Order No 637 
compliance filing, the tariff provisions removing the price cap 
submitted therein would likely not be effective until 2001.
    Trailblazer respectfully requests waiver of any provisions of its 
Tariff and/or the Commission's Regulations required to permit the 
instant filing to become effective as proposed.
    Trailblazer states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
its customers and interested state commissions.

[[Page 41651]]

    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web. http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-17003 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                                                                    ------------

                          Engineering Animation, Inc.
                       Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             ------------------------------------
                                                                   Years Ended December 31,
                                                             ------------------------------------
                                                                    1994        1995        1996
                                                             (in thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>         <C>
Primary:
  Weighted average number of shares outstanding                3,017,547   2,869,760   4,390,807
  Net effect of dilutive stock options--based on treasury
  stock method using the IPO price of $18.00 per share for
  1994 and 1995 and average market price of $21.49 for 1996      490,283     645,001     734,661
SAB 83 adjustment due to cheap stock                             186,941     186,941      31,157
                                                             ------------------------------------

Total                                                           3,694,771   3,701,702   5,156,625
                                                             ------------------------------------

Net income                                                       $113,933    $430,665  $1,851,002
                                                             ------------------------------------

Income per share of common stock                                     $.03        $.12        $.36
                                                             ------------------------------------

Fully Diluted:
  Weighted average number of shares outstanding                 3,017,547   2,869,760   4,390,807
  Net effect of dilutive stock options--based on treasury
  stock method using the year-end market price, if higher
  than average market price                                       490,283     645,001     800,456
SAB 83 adjustment due to cheap stock                              186,941     186,941      31,157
                                                             ------------------------------------

Total                                                           3,694,771   3,701,702   5,222,420
                                                             ------------------------------------

Net income                                                       $113,933    $430,665  $1,851,002
                                                             ------------------------------------

Income per share of common stock                                     $.03        $.12        $.35
                                                             ------------------------------------
</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.340 Attendance of witness; disobedience.

The attendance of witnesses and the production of documentary evidence may be required from any place in the United States at any designated place of hearing. In case of disobedience to a subpena, the Commission or any party to a proceeding before the Commission may invoke the aid of any court of the United States in requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of documentary evidence.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

1. The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 24, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Fernando Sanchez
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Fernando Sanchez                                 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before of after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

November 20, 2020

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2019-1133

BIOGEN MA INC.,

Plaintiff -Appellee

v.

EMD SERONO, INC., PFIZER INC.,

Defendants-Appellants

BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC., 

NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION,

Defendants

Decided: September 28, 2020

Precedential Opinion

______________________

Please make the following changes:

On page 8, lines 17–20, change “emphasized that 

whereas the attached carbohydrate groups in native IFN-β protein were glycosolated, the attached 

carbohydrate groups in recombinant IFN-β were 

not glycosolated,” to —explained that the glycosylation patterns in native IFN-β and recombinant 

IFN-β were different,—.

Case: 19-1133 Document: 98 Page: 1 Filed: 11/20/2020
- 4,4 (TIGAIL 

FILED 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0272 

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONTANA 

and PAUL FREDERICK HENKE, M.D., on 

behalf of themselves and their patients, 

Plaintiffs and Appellees, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA and AUSTIN 

KNUDSEN, Attorney General of the State of 

Montana, in his official capacity, and his agents 

and successors, 

Defendants and Appellants. 

MEL) 

MAR 12 2024 

Bowen Greenwoo,- Clerk of Supreme 

State of 

ORDER 

Bowen Greenwood 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

STATE OF MONTANA 

Nicole Saharsky, of Washington, DC, has petitioned for permission to appear pro hac 

vice before this Court in the above-entitled cause. 

Having reviewed the application and having determined that, as required by our Rules 

for Admission to the Bar of Montana, Petitioner Saharsky is currently in good standing with 

another state jurisdiction in which Saharsky is admitted to the practice of law, Montana 

counsel listed in the application is in good standing with the State Bar of Montana, and this is 

the first appearance of Petitioner and the fourth appearance of Petitioner's firm under the pro 

hac vice rules, with good cause showing under Rule VI(C), 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application ofNicole Saharsky to appear pro hac 

vice in the above-entitled cause is GRANTED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Nichole Saharsky, to all 

counsel of record in this appeal, and to the State Bar of Montana. 

DATED this l2th day of March 2024. 

03/12/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0272

03/18/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0160
For the Court, 

By 

2
# MAJ Abdullah H. Clark

### Instructor

### 

### 

**Areas of interest: Military Strategy, Defense Policy, Strategic Leadership, Organizational Development**

Major Abdullah H. Clark is an instructor in the Information Strategy and Disruptive Technology Department.  Major Clark began his military career by enlisting in 1999, and spent over a decade serving in various combat units.  His commissioned service began in 2010 with training as an infantry officer before later transferring to Functional Area 59 (FA59), Army Strategist. 

Major Clark’s assignments span the tactical, operational, and strategic levels, including overseas service in Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine, and Malawi.  He has served in several institutional assignments including to Army Human Resources Command, the Joint Staff, and Army Staff.  His most recent assignment was with the Secretary of the Army, working as a strategic planner.

Major Clark is a trained researcher with experience in qualitative and quantitative methodologies in addition to his Army War College certifications in strategy, policy development, planning and the strategic art.  His doctoral research at George Washington University has included courses in statistical research for group comparison and design analysis, survey research, and qualitative data collection with research participants.  He also completed graduate training in instructional design following his interest in curriculum development.

Major Clark’s written work spans multiple disciplines such as history, security studies, and organizational development.  His thesis at Norwich University explored the strategic implications of the Berlin airlift, while his policy research project at Georgetown University focused on enhancing security mechanisms for countering Violent Extremist Organizations (VEO) in Africa.

Major Clark is a graduate of requisite professional military education programs from enlisted and commissioned service. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in history from Fayetteville State University, a Masters of Arts in military history from Norwich University, a Masters of Public Administration from Columbus State University, and a Masters of Policy Management from Georgetown University.  He is currently a doctoral candidate at George Washington University, where his dissertation research is focused on organizational leadership.
#### § 22.1003 Eligibility.

Any eligible entity (see § 22.7) may apply for central station license(s) and/or offshore subscriber licenses under this subpart.

[70 FR 19312, Apr. 13, 2005]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4044

_____________________________

LEON J. NICELY, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

July 9, 2018

PER CURIAM.

This court issued an order on May 2, 2018, directing 

Appellant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed 

against him in light of his having instituted numerous repetitive, 

meritless proceedings in this court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.

2d 47 (Fla. 1999). We have reviewed Appellant’s response and 

determined it does not provide a legal basis to justify withholding 

imposition of sanctions.

Appellant is hereby prohibited from filing any pro se filings 

in this court challenging his conviction and sentence imposed in 

Duval County case number 16-1996-CF-8172. The Clerk of this 

court is directed to not accept any filings in this case unless they 

are signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar. 
2

Additionally, we find this appeal is a frivolous proceeding 

brought before this court by a state prisoner. See § 944.279(1), 

Fla. Stat. (2017). We direct the clerk to forward a certified copy of 

this opinion to the appropriate institution or facility within the 

Florida Department of Corrections for disciplinary procedures 

pursuant to department rules.

OSTERHAUS, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Leon J. Nicely, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 26.105 Authorization required. ( a ) *General rule.* Stations in the Space Launch Services must be used and operated only in accordance with the service rules set forth in this part, including the terms of the frequency coordination performed pursuant to subpart C of this part, and with a valid authorization granted by the Commission under the provisions of this part, except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Restrictions.* The holding of an authorization does not create any rights beyond the terms, conditions, and period specified in the authorization. Authorizations may be granted upon proper application, provided that the Commission finds that the applicant is qualified in regard to citizenship, character, financial, technical, and other criteria, and that the public interest, convenience, and necessity will be served. *See* 47 U.S.C. 301, 308, 309, and 310.
### Ames, Angelia (OST) From: 

### Sent: To:



### Cc: Subject: Attachments:

Hi All, Adams, Kevin (OST) Thursday, May 23, 2013 4:11 PM Gabriel! Kimbrell; Greg Kahltorf (greg@pacificwings.com); Henry.P.Bruckner@Hawaii.gov; Kamuela, Mayor (Big Island), 2013; kawehi@mokulele.com; KimoKamuela@USA.net; Makani Kai, Richard Schuman; Pacific Wings, Greg Kahlstorf; Ron Hansen (ron.hansen@mokulelehawaii.com) Devany, Dennis (OST); Ames, Angelia (OST) Request for Comment re Three Proposals for EAS at Kamuela Proposal of Pacific Wings.pdf; Proposal of Mokulele Airlines.pdf; Proposal of Makani Kai.pdf

Attached above are copies ofthethree timely-filed proposals for Essential AirService (EAS) at Kamuela, submitted by Pacific Wings, MokuleleAirlines, and Makani Kai. We are currently reviewing those proposals. The attached proposals are directlyfrom the carriers and will soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regulations.gov at DOT-OST-1997-2833, alongwith other pertinent information on this proceeding
.. The next step in the carrier-selection process is for us to receive community comments, acritically importantelement in ourcarrier-selection decision, especiallythe comments ofcivic officials. Ac.cordingly, I askthat everyone get backto us, preferably by email, no laterthan June 

### 20, 2013. We will docketthis email, as well as any replies. In brief, lookatthe three proposals, and ifyou have any questions, call 

### me, and get back to us bythe deadline, June 20.

Kevin Adams 202-366-1047

1
fox-ex102_74.htm



 

Exhibit 10.2

 

December 19, 2016

 

David F. DeVoe

Senior Advisor

Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc.

1211 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036


			
	
 
	
 
	
 




 

Dear Dave:

 

This letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) is intended to constitute a formal binding modification to your agreement dated as of November 15, 2004, with 21st Century Fox America, Inc. (formerly known as News America Incorporated) (“21CFA”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. (formerly known as News Corporation) (“21st Century Fox”), as amended (the “Agreement”) and shall confirm the terms and conditions which will apply to your Agreement as of the date of this Letter Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Letter Agreement and not defined shall have the meanings given such terms in the Agreement. 

 

21CFA and you agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 

1.Section 2 of the Agreement, as amended, states that the Term of Employment shall mean the period from November 15, 2004 through December 31, 2016. 21CFA and you hereby agree to extend the Term of Employment for a period of one year such that the Term of Employment shall mean the period through December 31, 2017.

 

2. 21CFA and you hereby agree that you shall not be entitled to receive any Annual Bonus and you shall not be eligible to receive a Performance-Based LTIP award during the Term of Employment.

 




 



 

By counter-signing this Letter Agreement, you acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms hereof.

 


	
 
	
 
	
Sincerely,

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
21ST CENTURY FOX AMERICA, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
By:
	
 /s/ Janet Nova 

	
 
	
 
	
Name:
	
Janet Nova

	
 
	
 
	
Title:
	
Executive Vice President and Deputy General Counsel 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 /s/ David F. DeVoe
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
David F. DeVoe
# Comments on: 18-1407: GLASSWALL SOLUTIONS LIMITED v. CLEARSWIFT LTD. [OPINION], Nonprecedential