alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Notice of Implementation of the New Scheduling Conflicts Procedure - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pHp0cciM5m\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-implementation-of-the-new-scheduling-conflicts-procedure\/\">Notice of Implementation of the New Scheduling Conflicts Procedure<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-implementation-of-the-new-scheduling-conflicts-procedure\/embed\/#?secret=pHp0cciM5m\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Implementation of the New Scheduling Conflicts Procedure” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"pHp0cciM5m\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"This is a reminder that the new scheduling conflicts procedure takes effect today, January 2, 2019. \u00a0Updated versions of the Guide to Oral Argument (pdf) and the Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts form (pdf) are available on our website.\u00a0 Counsel should begin using this new form when advising the court of scheduling […]"}
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-3239

___________ Douglas Voss; Elizabeth Voss; * Arthur Voss; E. Berniece Voss, * * Appeal from the United States Appellants, * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Saint Martin Cooperative, et al., * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 6, 2010 Filed: May 25, 2010

___________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. The Voss family, organic dairy farmer s in rural Minnesota, commenced this damage action alleging that defendants’ unlawful application of chemical pesticides on a neighboring farm caused the chemicals to drift and to damage the Vosses and their property. Liberally construed, the pro se complaint alleged a federal cause of action for a labeling violation of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq. , and a state law cause of action for violation of Minn. Stat. § 18B.07, subd. 2. The district court dismissed the entire complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because “it is well-settled that FIFRA does not provide for a private right of action.”-2- We agree that FIFRA does not provide a pr ivate right of action to farmers and others injured as a result of a manuf acturer’s violation of FIFRA’s labeling requirements. See Bates v. Dow Agrosciences, LLC , 544 U.S. 431, 448 (2005); No Spray Coalition, Inc. v. City of New York , 351 F.3d 602, 605 (2nd Cir. 2003); Cottrell, Ltd. v. Biotrol Intern., Inc. , 191 F.3d 1248, 1255 (10th Cir. 1999) (FIFRA is exclusively enforced by EPA); Almond High School v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture , 768 F.2d 1030, 1035 (9th Cir. 1985). However, the Vosses expressly pleaded a cause of action arising under this federal statute. Therefore, the district court erred in concluding it lacked subject matter jurisd iction. In these circumstances, the appropriate disposition is to dismiss the fe deral claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief may begranted, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the pendent state law claim, see 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c).
Accordingly, the district court is di rected to enter an amended judgment providing that the federal claim for violation of FIFRA is dismissed with prejudice and the balance of the complaint is dismisse d without prejudice. As so modified, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
## OERARTMEN TO F SERVE D SEPTEMBE R,,20, 0 l^fPSff e U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S '>Oi O '^c P- 2 A ' ^ 5 2 WASHINGTON , D C IN TH EMATTE RO F SKYWES T AIRLINES , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP09NM001 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No . FAA-2009-097 9 

## HEARIN GNOTIC E NOTIC EI S HEREB Y GIVE N that testimon y an devidenc e wil l b e heardan dconsidere d o n Decembe r

1 , 2 an d3,2010 , a

t th e U.S . Ta x Court , Courtroo m5223 , Wallac e F . Bennet t Federa l Building , 12 5 S . Stat e Street , Sal t Lak e City , U T 84138 . Hearing s wil l commenc e at

9:0 0 a.m . an dconclud e at 4:3 0 p.m . eac hday . Th e partie s shoul d vacat e th e courthous e o n o r befor e 5:0 0 p.m . eac hday . ERED .

u char dC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachment(s ) - Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP09NM001 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Tod dC . Emerson , Respondent' s Counse l Director , Governmen t

an dLegal Affair s Sk y Wes t Airline s 44 4 Sout hRive r Roa d St . George , U T 8479 0 TEL : 435-634-353 0 FAX : 435-634-350 5 Scott R . Morris , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Nprthwes t

Moimtai n Region , ANM- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W . Renton , W A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-141 7 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Ofiic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202- 3 66-21 3 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , use th e followin g address ; Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"19-2116: BATCHER v. WILKIE [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WbLl6nTmy6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/9-11-2020-19-2116-batcher-v-wilkie-opinion-19-2116-opinion-9-11-2020_1650980\/\">19-2116: BATCHER v. WILKIE [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/9-11-2020-19-2116-batcher-v-wilkie-opinion-19-2116-opinion-9-11-2020_1650980\/embed\/#?secret=WbLl6nTmy6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“19-2116: BATCHER v. WILKIE [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"WbLl6nTmy6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: BATCHER v. WILKIE [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 19-2116 Origin: CAVC Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Sample Brief Cover (District Court Cases)

2021-1111, 2021-1112

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ABC CORPORATION, DEF COMPANY, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

UVW, LTD., XYZ, CO.,

Defendants-Cross Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa 

in CV-99-1234,

Judge Robert Washington

BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS-CROSS APPELLANTS UVW, LTD. and 

XYZ, CO.

December 1, 2021

JOHN JONES, JR. 

SMITH & JONES

123 Main Street

Anytown, ST 12345

(555) 555-5555

Johnjones@anymail.com

Counsel for DefendantsCross Appellants
#### § 51-9.101-1 Collection and use.

Any information used in whole or in part in making a determination about an individual's rights, benefits, or privileges under the Committee programs, shall, to the extent practicable, be collected directly from the subject individual. At the time information is collected, the individual must be informed of the authority for collecting such information, whether providing the information is mandatory or voluntary, the purposes for which the information will be used, the routine uses as published in the Federal Register, and the effects on the individual, if any, of not providing the information. The information collected shall be used only for the intended purpose or permission for additional use will be obtained from the subject individual.
701 North Terminal Road

Greensboro, NC 27409

336-896-0400 – phone

540-515-3937 – fax

Mr. Richard Canovai.

Principal Maintenance Inspector 

FAA, Flight Standards District Office 

1301 South Terminal Service Road 

Greensboro, North Carolina 27409 

(336) 369-3910, Fax: (336) 369-3980

Subject: Adjustment of Compliance time for Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) parts 25, 26, 

121, specifically 14CFR 121.1117 for U.S. Air Carriers.

Dynamic Airways is hereby requesting an Adjustment of Compliance time for 14CFR121.1117 

Reduction of Fuel Tank Flammability in Transport Category Airplanes. This request is for Dynamic 

Airways aircraft N254MY Model 767-336ER; S/N 25443; Line 419; Variable VN123. Dynamic Airways 

would like to extend the Compliance date no later than December 26, 2017 for the airplane listed.

Background: 

The parts Kit required to accomplish this AD is not available within the compliance time, which is 

December 26th 2014. Dynamic Airways PO# 10471 has been issued to purchase top kit from Boeing.

Dynamic is proposing to comply with requirements outlined in 14CFR121.1117(k):

(k) The compliance dates specified in paragraph (e) of this section may be extended by one year, provided that—

(1) No later than March 26, 2009, the certificate holder notifies its assigned Flight Standards Office or Principal 

Inspector that it intends to comply with this paragraph;

(2) No later than June 24, 2009, the certificate holder applies for an amendment to its operations specification in 

accordance with §119.51 of this chapter and revises the manual required by §121.133 to include a requirement for the 

airplane models specified in Table 2 of this section to use ground air conditioning systems for actual gate times of more 

than 30 minutes, when available at the gate and operational, whenever the ambient temperature exceeds 60 degrees 

Fahrenheit; and

(3) Thereafter, the certificate holder uses ground air conditioning systems as described in paragraph (k)(2) of this 

section on each airplane subject to the extension.
TABLE 2

Model—Boeing Model—Airbus

747 Series A318, A319, A320, A321 Series

737 Series A300, A310 Series

777 Series A330, A340 Series

767 Series

757 Series

(l) For any certificate holder for which the operating certificate is issued after December 26, 2008, the compliance 

date specified in paragraph (e) of this section may be extended by one year, provided that the certificate holder meets the 

requirements of paragraph (k)(2) of this section when its initial operations specifications are issued and, thereafter, uses 

ground air conditioning systems as described in paragraph (k)(2) of this section on each airplane subject to the extension.

If you have any question please don’t hesitate to contact me at 336-681-3591.

Steven L. Kellenburger

Director of Quality

Dynamic Airways

336-681-3591

CC: Bill Gray, COO

Mike Steinke, Director of Maintenance
#### § 22.881 Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service subject to competitive bidding.

Mutually exclusive initial applications for general aviation Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service licenses and mutually exclusive initial applications for commercial Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service licenses are subject to competitive bidding. The general competitive bidding procedures set forth in part 1, subpart Q, of this chapter will apply unless otherwise provided in this subpart.

[70 FR 76417, Dec. 27, 2005]
#### § 22.515 Permissible communications paths.

Mobile stations may communicate only with and through base stations. Base stations may communicate only with mobile stations and receivers on land or surface vessels.
§ 25.403 Bidding application and certification procedures. Submission of Supplemental Application Information. In order to be eligible to bid, each pending applicant must timely submit certain supplemental information. All supplemental information shall be filed by the applicant five days after publication of these rules in the Federal Register. The supplemental information must be certified and include the following: ( a ) Applicant's name;
( b ) Mailing Address (no Post Office boxes);
( c ) City;
( d ) State;
( e ) ZIP Code;
( f ) Auction Number 15;
( g ) FCC Account Number;
( h ) Person(s) authorized to make or withdraw a bid (list up to three individuals);
( i ) Certifications and name and title of person certifying the information provided;
( j ) Applicant's contact person and such person's telephone number, E-mail address and FAX number; and
( k ) Signature and date.
# 

# BILL OF COSTS

## TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, TENTH DISTRICT, AT WACO

No. 10-16-00111-CV

**In the Interest of H.L.H. and A.H., Children**

(No. DC-D201500336 IN 413th District Court OF Johnson COUNTY)

**Balance of costs owing to the Tenth Court of Appeals, Waco, Texas:  0.00**

***Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.***

I, **SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK** OF THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

**IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,**witness my hand and the Seal of the **COURT OF APPEALS**for the Tenth District of Texas, this August 9, 2016.

SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK

By:___________________________

Kim Wernet, Deputy Clerk
#### § 22.653 Eligibility.

Only licensees already authorized to provide trunked mobile service or their successors in interest are eligible to apply for additional use of these channels for trunked mobile service, and then only in the urban areas already authorized.
# April Certificate Grads and June Master's Degree Grads Celebrated

/ Published June 13, 2014

On April 25, 2014, over 160 iCollege students graduated with one or more certificates in Cyber Security, Cyber Leadership, CIO, CFO, EA, IT Project Management, and/or the Advanced Management Program.  On June 12, 2014,  54 iCollege Master’s Degree in Government Information Leadership graduates joined other NDU Master's graduates in earning their diplomas.  Congrats to all grads, and the families/friends who supported them!   The faculty, staff, and leadership team of the NDU iCollege are excited that we continue to meet the Department of Defense and wider federal community’s information leadership and cyber education needs.  We hope you will come visit us soon!
#### Wilsonia E. GORHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CATALYTICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant—Appellee.

No. 03-1815.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 19, 2003.

Decided Feb. 23, 2004.

Wilsonia E. Gorham, Appellant pro se. Zebulon Dyer Anderson, Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell *&*Jernigan, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Wilsonia E. Gorham appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer in her civil action in which she alleged her employment was terminated in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Gor-*
      *680
      *ham v. Catalytica Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,*No. CA-01-104-H-4 (E.D.N.C. May 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

SIGNATURES

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Jeffrey R. Cramer, Chief Executive Officer of Anacomp, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:
     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
     certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with
     the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
     (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.

Dated: February 11, 2004


                                           /s/ Jeffrey R. Cramer
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Jeffrey R. Cramer
                                           Chief Executive Officer

<Page>

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Linster W. Fox, Chief Financial Officer of Anacomp, Inc. (the "Registrant"),
do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:
     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
     certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
     (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.

Dated: February 11, 2004


                                           /s/ Linster W. Fox
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Linster W. Fox
                                           Chief Financial Officer
4452 

4453 

4454 

4455 

4456 

4457 

4458 

4459 

4460 

4461 

4462 

4463 

4464 

4465 

4466 

4467 

4468 

4469 

4470 

4471 

4472 

4473 

4474 

4475 

4476 

4477 

4478 

4479 

4480 

4481 

4482 

4483 

4484 

4485 

4486 

4487 

4488 

4489 

4490 

4491 

4492 

4493 

4494 

4495 

4496 

4497 

4498 

4499 

4500 

4501 

4502 

4503 

4504 

4505 

4506 

4507 

4508 

4509 

4510 

4511 

4512 

4513 

4514 

4515 

4516 

4517 

4518 

4519 

4520 

4521 

4522 

4523 

4524 

4525 

4526 

4527 

4528 

4529 

4530 

4531 

4532 

4533 

4534 

4535 

4536 

4537 

4538 

4539 

4540 

4541 

4542 

4543 

4544 

4545 

4546 

4547 

4548 

4549 

4550 

4551 

4552 

4553 

4554 

4555 

4556 

4557 

4558 

4559 

4560 

4561 

4562 

4563 

4564 

4565 

4566 

4567 

4568 

4569 

4570 

4571 

4572 

4573 

4574 

4575 

4576 

4577 

4578 

4579 

4580 

4581 

4582 

4583 

4584 

4585 

4586 

4587 

4588 

4589 

4590 

4591 

4592 

4593 

4594 

4595 

4596 

4597 

4598 

4599 

4600 

4601 

4602 

4603 

4604 

4605 

4606 

4607 

4608 

4609 

4610 

4611 

4612 

4613 

4614 

4615 

4616 

4617 

4618 

4619 

4620 

4621 

4622 

4623 

4624 

4625 

4626 

4627 

4628 

4629 

4630 

4631 

4632 

4633 

4634 

4635 

4636 

4637 

4638 

4639 

4640 

4641 

4642 

4643 

4644 

4645 

4646 

4647 

4648 

4649 

4650 

4651 

4652 

4653 

4654 

4655 

4656 

4657 

4658 

4659 

4660 

4661 

4662 

4663 

4664 

4665 

4666 

4667 

4668 

4669 

4670 

4671 

4672 

4673 

4674 

4675 

4676 

4677 

4678 

4679 

4680 

4681 

4682 

4683 

4684 

4685 

4686 

4687 

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:22:09-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO