alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Rules of Practice Amendments 2017 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bn0OZqAYsu\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/rules-procedures-forms\/rules-of-practice-amendments\/rules-of-practice-amendments-2017\/\">Rules of Practice Amendments 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/rules-procedures-forms\/rules-of-practice-amendments\/rules-of-practice-amendments-2017\/embed\/#?secret=bn0OZqAYsu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Rules of Practice Amendments 2017” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"bn0OZqAYsu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Amendment Notices Following public notice and comment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2071(b), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has amended the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice 47.4 and 47.5.  The new versions of Federal Circuit Rules 47.4 and 47.5, as well as a revised Form 9 (Certificate of Interest), are available [...]"}
No. 11-5115.

#### Moore *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 25.258 Sharing between NGSO MSS feeder-link stations and GSO FSS services in the 29.25-29.5 GHz band. ( a ) Operators of NGSO MSS feeder link earth stations and GSO FSS earth stations in the band 29.25 to 29.5 GHz where both services have a co-primary allocation shall cooperate fully in order to coordinate their systems. During the coordination process both service operators shall exchange the necessary technical parameters required for coordination.
( b ) Licensed GSO FSS earth stations in the vicinity of operational NGSO MSS feeder-link earth station complexes must, to the maximum extent possible, operate with frequency/polarization selections that will minimize unacceptable interference with reception of GSO FSS and NGSO MSS uplink transmissions in the 29.25-29.5 GHz band. Earth station licensees operating with GSO FSS systems shall be capable of providing earth station locations to support coordination of NGSO MSS feeder link stations under paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section. Operation of ubiquitously deployed GSO FSS earth stations in the 29.25-29.5 GHz frequency band must conform to the rules contained in § 25.218(i).
( c ) Applicants for authority to use the 29.25-29.5 GHz band for NGSO MSS feeder uplinks will have to demonstrate that their systems can share with GSO FSS and NGSO MSS systems that have been authorized for operation in that band.
[67 FR 37336, May 29, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 16967, Apr. 8, 2003; 81 FR 55348, Aug. 18, 2016; 84 FR 53659, Oct. 8, 2019]
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 31 13

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Raym on d D. Ell io tt
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Ocwen Loan Serv ic in g, L.L.C.

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

Defe nd an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of S ou th Dako ta - Rap id Cit y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: May 31, 2 01 8 Fi le d: Ju ne 5, 2 01 8 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, COLLO TON, and ERICKSON, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Raym on d Ell io tt ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s 1 ad ve rs e gr an t o f s um m ary jud gm en t in hi s act io n se ek in g res ci ss io n of hi s ho m e lo an un de r th e Trut h in Len di ng

1 The Hon or ab le Je ffre y L. Vik en , Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of S ou th Dako ta

.Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 16 01 -1 66 7f

. Hav in g care fu ll y rev ie wed th e reco rd an d th e pa rti es ’ fil in gs , se e Pet ers on v. Ko pp , 75 4 F .3d 59 4, 5 98 (8t h C ir. 20 14 ) (g ran t of su m m ary jud gm en t is rev ie wed de no vo ; reco rd is vi ewed in li gh t m os t fav or ab le to no nm ov in g pa rty), we affi rm fo r th e reas on s st at ed in th e di st ric t co ur t ’s or de r. See 8t h Ci r. R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Abraham Pierce, President and Chief Executive Officer of TotalMed, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on 10QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 22, 2005



/s/ Abraham Pierce

_______________________



Abraham Pierce

President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 14.37 Review and disposition of informal complaints. ( a ) The Commission will investigate the allegations in any informal complaint filed that satisfies the requirements of § 14.34(b) of this subpart, and, within 180 days after the date on which such complaint was filed with the Commission, issue an order finding whether the manufacturer or service provider that is the subject of the complaint violated section 255, 716, or 718 of the Act, or the Commission's implementing rules, and provide a basis therefore, unless such complaint is resolved before that time.
( b ) If the Commission determines in an order issued pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section that the manufacturer or service provider violated section 255, 716, or 718 of the Act, or the Commission's implementing rules, the Commission may, in such order, or in a subsequent order: ( 1 ) Direct the manufacturer or service provider to bring the service, or in the case of a manufacturer, the next generation of the equipment or device, into compliance with the requirements of section 255, 716, or 718 of the Act, and the Commission's rules, within a reasonable period of time; and
( 2 ) Take such other enforcement action as the Commission is authorized and as it deems appropriate.
( c ) Any manufacturer or service provider that is the subject of an order issued pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall have a reasonable opportunity, as established by the Commission, to comment on the Commission's proposed remedial action before the Commission issues a final order with respect to that action.
# CDR Deanna Fisher 

### Senior Fellow

### 

### 

A native of Balaklava, South Australia, Australia, CDR Deanna Fisher was commissioned in 2005 through Naval Reserve Officers Training Corps at Virginia Tech.

Designated a Surface Warfare Officer, she served as sea as the Electronic Warfare Officer in USS STOUT (DDG 55), USS GONZALEZ (DDG 66) and USS LABOON (DDG 58), deploying in DDG CREW SIERRA as part of the East Coast Sea Swap initiative to support Operation IRAQI FREEDOM. She served as the Ship’s Navigator in USS WHIDBEY ISLAND (LSD 41) with a second deployment in support of Counter-Piracy Operations off the coast of Africa. In 2009, she deployed to Iraq/Kuwait as a Counter-IED Instructor for Joint CREW Composite Squadron-1and completed shore duty at NCIS Headquarters in Washington DC. CDR Fisher transferred to the Reserve Component in 2013.

CDR Fisher’s first assignment in the Reserve Component was NR COMTENTHFLT supporting Fleet Cyber Command/U.S. TENTH Fleet, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, where she served as N11 Admin Officer, and N31 Current Operations Officer/Senior Watch Officer. She completed a year of ADSW at USCYBERCOM in the J35/J3F-DODIN division. Next, she served as MSC Cargo Afloat Rigging Team Detachment OIC in Youngstown, Ohio and as N1 Admin/Shipboard Mentor for NR CSG4 FST-E out of Dam Neck, VA. She completed a mobilization as Officer in Charge of the Military Detachment onboard USNS Carson City (T-EPF 7) supporting CTF-63.

She is currently on Active-Duty orders assigned the College of Information and Cyberspace at National Defense University as Military Faculty, where she is part of the JPME2 teaching faculty.

LCDR Fisher holds a Master of Science in Government Information Leadership (with dual concentrations in National Security and Cyberspace, and Ethics) from National Defense University, and Master of Science in I/O Psychology from Capella University.  Her decorations include the Meritorious Service Medal, Joint Commendation Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Navy Commendation Medal, the Navy Achievement Medal (3 awards) and a variety of campaign and service awards.

In her civilian career, she serves as the Deputy for Future Operations (J35) at Cyber National Mission Force, a sub-unified command of USCYBERCOM in Fort George G. Meade, Maryland. She resides in Maryland.
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement



 Exhibit 10.17 
 December 18, 2003 
 Robert M. Myers 
 Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement 
 Dear Bob, 
 As we have discussed, the vesting schedule on the 815,000 shares you initially purchased as a Purchaser of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) was
somewhat different from the vesting schedule for the other founders of the Company. Upon reflection, you and the Company have agreed that your shares should have the same vesting schedule as that of the other founders. Therefore, you and the Company
hereby agree to delete Section 2.2 of the Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of April 30, 2003 between you and the Company (the “Purchase Agreement”), and replace it with the following: 
 “2.2 Except as provided in Section 2.3 below, if the Purchaser terminates his Services or
the Company terminates the Purchaser’s Services (each, a “Termination”), the Company has a right (but not obligation) to repurchase (the “Right of Repurchase”) all or any portion of the Shares
held by the Purchaser for a price per share equal to the Repurchase Price paid by cash, check, wire transfer, cancellation of indebtedness or some combination thereof; provided, however, that the Right of Repurchase shall expire with respect to
1/48th of the Shares on each monthly anniversary following April 1, 2003 (i.e., so that the Right of
Repurchase shall have expired with respect to all of the Shares 48 months following April 1, 2003).” 
 Except as set forth above, the Purchase
Agreement remains in full force and effect as originally executed. 
 Please sign both copies of this Amendment No. 1 and return one original to me.

  

	
	Yours truly,
	
	 /s/ Carol Gamble

	Carol Gamble
	Vice President and General Counsel


 Agreed and accepted as of the 18th day of December, 2003 
  

	
	 /s/ Robert M. Myers

	Robert M. Myers
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Parts 31 and 32
          - [TD 9233]
          - RIN 1545-BC89

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Correction to final regulations.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects final regulations (TD 9233) that were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 15, 2005 (70 FR 74198). The final regulations provide guidance regarding the treatment of payments made on account of sickness or accident disability under a workers' compensation law for purposes of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA).                    

# DATES:

This correction is effective December 15, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Ford (202) 622-6040 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

The final regulations (TD 9233) that are the subject of this correction are under section 3121 of the Internal Revenue Code.

## Need for Correction

As published, the final regulation (TD 9233) contain errors that may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification.

## Correction of the Publication

Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 9233), which were the subject of FR Doc. 05-23945, is corrected as follows:

1. On page 74198, column 2, in the preamble under the paragraph heading “Background”, lines 5 and 6, the language “for Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) purposes payments made on “ is corrected to read “for FICA purposes payment made on”.

                        2. On page 74199, column 1, in the preamble under the paragraph heading “Explanation of Provisions”, first paragraph of the column, line 3, the language “extent necessary. The Service                               ( print page 4043)                            has” is corrected to read “extent necessary. The IRS has”.                    

Cynthia E. Grigsby, 

Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. 06-681 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[House Report 106-28]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
  1st Session           HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                 106-28

=======================================================================

 
   PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 514, THE WIRELESS PRIVACY 
                        ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 1999

                                _______
                                

 February 23, 1999.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 77]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 77, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 514, 
the ``Wireless Privacy Enhancement Act of 1999'' under an open 
rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided 
equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Commerce.
    The rule waives points of order against consideration of 
the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII 
(requiring a three-day layover of the committee report). The 
Commerce Committee report was filed on Tuesday, February 23, 
and the bill will possibly be considered on the floor as early 
as Wednesday, February 24. The rule further provides that each 
section of the bill shall be considered as read.
    The Chair is authorized to accord priority in recognition 
to Members who have preprinted their amendments in the 
Congressional Record. The rule allows for the Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole to postpone votes during consideration 
of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five minutes on a 
postponed question if the vote follows a fifteen minute vote. 
Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or 
without instructions.

                                

```
###### Editorial Note on Part 36

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

#### § 36.392 General and administrative—Account 6720.

(a) These expenses are divided into two categories:

(1) Extended Area Services (EAS).

(2) All other.

(b) Extended Area Services (EAS) settlements are directly assigned to the exchange operation.

(c) The expenses in this account are apportioned among the operations on the basis of the separation of the cost of the combined Big Three Expenses which include the following accounts:

| **Plant Specific Expenses** |
| --- |
| Central Office Switching Expenses | Account 6210. |
| Operators Systems Expenses | Account 6220. |
| Central Office Transmission Expenses | Account 6230. |
| Information Origination/Termination Expenses | Account 6310. |
| Cable and Wire Facilities Expense | Account 6410. |
| **Plant Non-Specific Expenses** |
| Network Operations Expenses | Account 6530. |
| **Customer Operations Expenses** |
| Marketing | Account 6610. |
| Services | Account 6620. |

Table 1 to Paragraph (c)

[52 FR 17229, May 6, 1987, as amended at 69 FR 12552, Mar. 17, 2004; 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018]
#### § 60-30.37 Final Administrative Order.

After expiration of the time for filing exceptions, the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, shall issue an Administrative Order which shall be served on all parties. Unless the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, issues an Administrative Order within 30 days after the expiration of the time for filing exceptions, the Administrative Law Judge's recommended decision shall become a final Administrative Order which shall become effective on the 31st day after expiration of the time for filing exceptions. Except as to specific time periods required in this subsection, 41 CFR 60-30.30 shall be applicable to this section.

[85 FR 30627, May 20, 2020]
No. 11-5443.

#### Porter *v.*Goord et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ALEXANDER LEO BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1457

[November 14, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 10-

5094CF10A.

Alexander Leo Brown, Bonifay, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine 

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 302-11.106 What is an accommodation party?

An accommodation party is an individual who signs an employee's financing agreement (e.g., a mortgage) to lend that individual's name (*i.e.,* credit) to the arrangement.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12255, Feb. 16, 2024]
#### § 15.609 Marketing of Access BPL equipment.

The marketing of Access BPL equipment must be directed solely to parties eligible to operate the equipment. Eligible parties consist of AC power line public utilities, Access BPL service providers and associates of Access BPL service providers. The responsible party, as defined in § 2.909 of this chapter, is responsible for ensuring that the equipment is marketed only to eligible parties. Marketing of the equipment in any other manner may be considered grounds for revocation of the grant of certification issued for the equipment.