alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             655
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,382
<INVENTORY>                                     14,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,367
<PP&E>                                          11,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,880
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,824
<SALES>                                         70,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,734
<CGS>                                           63,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   406
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,671)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,935)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,736)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.25)
        

</TABLE>
§ 302-6.8 Under what circumstances will I receive a TQSE allowance? You will receive a TQSE allowance if: ( a ) Your agency authorizes it before you occupy the temporary quarters;
( b ) Your relocation authorization specifies the TQSE method and the number of days allowed for you to receive TQSE;
( c ) You have signed a service agreement; and
( d ) You meet any additional conditions your agency has established.
166P16

#### State v. Jaahkii Quran Harris

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-770)

1. Allowed 05/09/2016

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,026,370
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,000,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,558,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     50,760
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         996,492
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     27,251,391
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (173,547)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,483,902
<DEPOSITS>                                  30,004,674
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             39,012
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,654
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,428,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              39,483,902
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,184,133
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              165,020
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               508,274
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,857,427
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             894,597
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             894,597
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          962,830
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  149,182
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,737,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (897,351)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (897,351)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (897,351)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.77)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                26,885
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,520
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              173,547
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-282-001]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

June 29, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 23, 2000, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised 
tariff sheet to become effective June 1, 2000:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 291

    Williston Basin states that on June 9, 2000, the Commission issued 
its ``Order Accepting Tariff Sheets Subject to Conditions'', in the 
above-referenced docket. The Order required Williston Basin to file 
revised tariff language reflecting the clarification made in Order No. 
637-A, providing that a maximum rate contract for more than one year, 
for a service which is not available for 12 consecutive months, would 
be subject to the right of first refusal. Williston Basin states it is 
submitting the instant filing to comply with that Order.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-17001 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON :

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,

http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center,

U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, gpo@custhelp.com.

61–916 PDF 2010

S. Hrg. 111–691 

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE 

ON THE ARTICLES AGAINST 

JUDGE G. THOMAS PORTEOUS, JR. 

HEARINGS

BEFORE THE

SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL 

COMMITTEE 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

ON

THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST JUDGE G. THOMAS 

PORTEOUS, JR., A JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 

November 16, 2010 

Volume 3 of 3, Part E 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate 
ii

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE ON THE ARTICLES 

AGAINST JUDGE G. THOMAS PORTEOUS, JR. 

CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri, Chairman

ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Vice Chairman 

AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota 

SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island 

TOM UDALL, New Mexico 

JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire 

EDWARD E. KAUFMAN, Delaware 

JIM DEMINT, South Carolina 

JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming 

ROGER WICKER, Mississippi 

MIKE JOHANNS, Nebraska 

JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho 

COMMITTEE STAFF 

DERRON R. PARKS, Staff Director and Chief Counsel 

THOMAS L. JIPPING, Deputy Staff Director and Deputy Chief Counsel 

JUSTIN KIM, Counsel

REBECCA S. SEIDEL, Counsel

ERIN P. JOHNSON, Deputy Counsel and Chief Clerk 

LAKE DISHMAN, Professional Staff Member 

CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE STAFF 

SUSAN NAVARRO SMELCER, Analyst on the Federal Judiciary 

SENATE LEGAL COUNSEL STAFF 

MORGAN J. FRANKEL, Senate Legal Counsel 

PATRICIA MACK BRYAN, Deputy Senate Legal Counsel 

GRANT R. VINIK, Assistant Senate Legal Counsel 

THOMAS E. CABALLERO, Assistant Senate Legal Counsel 
iii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Committee gratefully acknowledges the high standard of professionalism and 

long hours of dedicated service of its staff. The Committee also expresses its appreciation to Lynden C. Armstrong, Chief Clerk of the Committee on Rules and Administration, and to the following staff of Committee members: 

STAFF OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS 

Senator MCCASKILL, Chairman, Derron R. Parks 

Senator HATCH, Vice Chairman, Thomas L. Jipping 

Senator KLOBUCHAR, Paige Herwig 

Senator WHITEHOUSE, Stephen C. N. Lilley and Justin G. Florence 

Senator UDALL, Matthew T. Nelson 

Senator SHAHEEN, Thomas J. Maloney 

Senator KAUFMAN, Nhan Nguyen 

Senator DEMINT, Erica Suares 

Senator BARRASSO, Bryn Stewart 

Senator WICKER, Emily Ferris 

Senator JOHANNS, Sarah Novascone 

Senator RISCH, Jason Bohrer 

INTERNS

Christian Dibblee 

Timothy Holman 

Hannah Lockhart 

Annie Moulton 

Michael Naclerio 

Patrick Sadler
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6273

DONTE JAVON JORDAN, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-290-2) Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 18, 2004 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donte Javon Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Donte Javon Jordan seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Jordan that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Jordan failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Jordan has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"20-1036: SPACE DATA CORPORATION v. ALPHABET INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zFjRugMm1d\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-19-2020-20-1036-space-data-corporation-v-alphabet-inc-rule-36-judgment-20-1036-rule_36_judgment-10-19-2020_1671338\/\">20-1036: SPACE DATA CORPORATION v. ALPHABET INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-19-2020-20-1036-space-data-corporation-v-alphabet-inc-rule-36-judgment-20-1036-rule_36_judgment-10-19-2020_1671338\/embed\/#?secret=zFjRugMm1d\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“20-1036: SPACE DATA CORPORATION v. ALPHABET INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"zFjRugMm1d\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: SPACE DATA CORPORATION v. ALPHABET INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT](pdf) Appeal Number: 20-1036 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4483

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit registered vendors

to administer claims for refund of diesel fuel taxes paid on fuel used

in certain buses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 1994

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit

registered vendors to administer claims for refund of

diesel fuel taxes paid on fuel used in certain buses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REGISTERED VENDORS TO ADMINISTER

4 CLAIMS FOR REFUND OF DIESEL FUEL TAXES

5 PAID ON FUEL USED IN CERTAIN BUSES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

7 6427(l)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

8 to registered vendors to administer claims for refund of

9 diesel fuel sold to farmers and State and local govern-
2

•HR 4483 IH

1 ments) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause

2 (i), by striking the period at the end of clause (ii) and

3 inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at the end the following

4 new clause:

5 ‘‘(iii) as described in subsection (b)(1) (after

6 the application of subsection (b)(3)).’’.

7 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The paragraph head8 ing for paragraph (5) of section 6427(l) of such Code is

9 amended by striking ‘‘SOLD TO’’ and all that follows and

10 inserting ‘‘USED BY FARMERS, STATE AND LOCAL GOV11 ERNMENTS, AND CERTAIN BUSES.—’’.

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section shall apply to fuel purchased after the date

14 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
# Comments on: 2018-1434: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals
793 A.2d 713

#### IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A CHILD BY JOHN D. STEWART.

February 22, 2002.

ORDER

Leave to appeal is granted.
Docket Number: FAA-2012-0414

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 9/29/2011

Regional Airline Association 9/29/2011

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 9/29/2011

ATA M Lopez 9/29/2011
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7735

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MICHAEL ROBINSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00194-HEH-1)

Submitted: February 24, 2009 Decided: March 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Robinson , No. 3:03-cr-00194-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2008). We deny Robinson’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60826 Conference Calendar

CATHERINE M STARR Plaintiff-Appellant

v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION; CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION; PRESIDENT, DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:05-CV-2107
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Catherine M. Starr filed a pro se suit in federal court alleging a copyright infringement. The defendants moved for dismissal of the suit under F E D
. R. C IV
. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) asserting, among other things, that the district court was without jurisdiction because Starr did not have a copyright registration. The district court granted the motion and dismissed Starr’s complaint for lack of United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 24, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-60826

2 subject matter jurisdiction. Our review is de novo. Copeland v. Wasserstein, Perella & Co., 278 F.3d 472, 477 (5th Cir. 2002). “[N]o action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be insti tuted until registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title.” 17 U.S.C. § 411(a) (2005). Registration is a jurisdictional prerequisite tofiling an infringement action. Creations Unlimited, Inc. v. McCain, 112 F.3d 814, 816 (5th Cir. 1997). This court does not require that a certificate from the Copyright Office be obtained before bringing suit, but it does require the plaintiff to have filed an application for registration with the Copyright Office prior to the infringement action. L akedreams v. Tayl or, 932 F.2d 103, 1108 (5th Cir. 1991). Starr’s complaint failed to allege that she had even applied for copyright registration. The district court did not err in dismissing Starr’s complaint. Starr’s motion for a default judgment on appeal is DENIED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 11-5358.

#### Amavizca *v.*Arizona.

Ct. App. Ariz. Certio-rari denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**SECTION1350 CERTIFICATION**

** **

In connection with this annual report of ML JWH Strategic AllocationFund  L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Robert M. Alderman,Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Date: March 1, 2006

 
| By                                             | /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|--------|
| Robert M. Alderman                             |                   |
| Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager |                   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                  |                   |

 

----