alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"23-1092: INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC v. IRACING.COM MOTORSPORT SIMULATIONS, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sBDoxKbgFv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-20-2023-23-1092-integrated-technology-solutions-llc-v-iracingcom-motorsport-simulations-llc-order-23-1092-order-1-20-2023_2066552\/\">23-1092: INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC v. IRACING.COM MOTORSPORT SIMULATIONS, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-20-2023-23-1092-integrated-technology-solutions-llc-v-iracingcom-motorsport-simulations-llc-order-23-1092-order-1-20-2023_2066552\/embed\/#?secret=sBDoxKbgFv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“23-1092: INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC v. IRACING.COM MOTORSPORT SIMULATIONS, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"sBDoxKbgFv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC v. IRACING.COM MOTORSPORT SIMULATIONS, LLC [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 23-1092 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 2.1074 Identification. ( a ) Devices subject only to Supplier's Declaration of Conformity shall be uniquely identified by the party responsible for marketing or importing the equipment within the United States. However, the identification shall not be of a format which could be confused with the FCC Identifier required on certified equipment. The responsible party shall maintain adequate identification records to facilitate positive identification for each device.
( b ) Devices subject to authorization under Supplier's Declaration of Conformity may be labeled with the following logo on a voluntary basis as a visual indication that the product complies with the applicable FCC requirements. The use of the logo on the device does not alleviate the requirement to provide the compliance information required by § 2.1077.
[82 FR 50829, Nov. 2, 2017]
§ 101.1527 Canadian and Mexican coordination. ( a ) A licensee of bands 71.0-76.0, 81.0-86.0, 92-94 GHz and 94.1-95 GHz must comply with § 1.928(f) of this chapter, which pertains to coordination with Canada.
( b ) A licensee of bands 71.0-76.0, 81.0-86.0, 92-94 GHz and 94.1-95 GHz must coordinate with Mexico in the following situations: ( 1 ) For a station the antenna of which looks within the 200 deg. sector toward the Mexico-United States borders, that area in each country within 35 miles of the borders; and
( 2 ) For a station the antenna of which looks within the 160 deg. sector away from the Canada-United States borders, that area in each country within 5 miles of the borders.
Exhibit
          23.1     Consent
          of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




To
      the
      Board of Directors


North
      Central Bancshares, Inc.


Fort
      Dodge, Iowa




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the North Central Bancshares,
      Inc.
      Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration #333-33089) as filed with
      the
      Commission on August 7, 1998 and the Registration Statement on Form S-8
      (Registration #333-82490) as filed with the Commission on February 11, 2002,
      of
      our report dated March 12, 2007, relating to our audit of the consolidated
      financial statements, which appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K of
      North Central Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December
      31,
      2006.





Des
        Moines, Iowa


March
      30,
      2007
§ 301-11.20 May my agency authorize a rest period for me while I am traveling? ( a ) Your agency may authorize a rest period not in excess of 24 hours at either an intermediate point or at your destination when: ( 1 ) Either your origin or destination is OCONUS;
( 2 ) Your scheduled flight time, including stopovers, exceeds 14 hours;
( 3 ) Travel is by a direct or usually traveled route; and
( 4 ) Travel is by coach class or premium economy class.
( b ) When a rest stop is authorized the applicable per diem rate is the rate for the rest stop location.
( c ) Your agency may authorize a rest period that exceeds 24 hours when no scheduled transportation service departs within 24 hours of your arrival at an intermediate point. To qualify for a rest period exceeding 24 hours, you must be scheduled to board the first available scheduled departure. Your agency will determine a reasonable additional length of time for any rest period exceeding 24 hours.
[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15961, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2005-03, 70 FR 28460, May 18, 2005; FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55705, Sept. 12, 2022]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-415.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

Control Measures on 

Avian Influenza 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and COLOMBIA 

Effected by Exchange of Letters 

April 15, 2012 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
COLOMBIA 

Trade: Control Measures on 

 Avian Influenza 

Agreement effected by exchange of letters 

 April 15, 2012; 

 Entered into force April 15, 2012.
§ 17.8 Establishment of antenna farm areas. ( a ) Each antenna farm area will be established by an appropriate rulemaking proceeding, which may be commenced by the Commission on its own motion after consultation with the FAA, upon request of the FAA, or as a result of a petition filed by any interested person. After receipt of a petition from an interested person disclosing sufficient reasons to justify institution of a rulemaking proceeding, the Commission will request the advice of the FAA with respect to the considerations of menace to air navigation in terms of air safety which may be presented by the proposal. The written communication received from the FAA in response to the Commission's request shall be placed in the Commission's public rulemaking file containing the petition, and interested persons shall be allowed a period of 30 days within which to file statements with respect thereto. Such statements shall also be filed with the Administrator of the FAA with proof of such filing to be established in accordance with § 1.47 of this chapter. The Administrator of the FAA shall have a period of 15 days within which to file responses to such statements. If the Commission, upon consideration of the matters presented to it in accordance with the above procedure, is satisfied that establishment of the proposed antenna farm would constitute a menace to air navigation for reasons of air safety, rulemaking proceedings will not be instituted. If rulemaking proceedings are instituted, any person filing comments therein which concern the question of whether the proposed antenna farm will constitute a menace to air navigation shall file a copy of the comments with the Administrator of the FAA. Proof of such filing shall be established in accordance with § 1.47 of this chapter.
( b ) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to mean that only one antenna farm area will be designated for a community. The Commission will consider on a case-by-case basis whether or not more than one antenna farm area shall be designated for a particular community.
[32 FR 8813, June 21, 1967, as amended at 32 FR 13591, Sept. 28, 1967]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41625-41626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1109]


Approval for Expanded Manufacturing Authority (Postage Franking 
Machines and Electronic Business Equipment) Within Foreign--Trade 
Subzone 77B, Brother Industries (U.S.A.) Inc., Bartlett, TN

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u),

[[Page 41626]]

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the City of Memphis, Tennessee, grantee of Foreign-Trade 
Zone 77, has applied to expand the scope of manufacturing authority for 
FTZ Subzone 77B (Brother Industries (U.S.A.) Inc. facilities in 
Bartlett, Shelby County, Tennessee) to include production of postage 
franking machines and electronic business equipment under FTZ 
procedures (FTZ Doc. 50-99; filed 10-18-99);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in Federal 
Register (64 FR 60766, 11-8-99); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application 
is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby approves the request subject to 
the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of June 2000.
Troy H. Cribb,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-17107 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Updated Clerk\u2019s Office Phone Menu System - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"oJrbnXW5UL\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/updated-clerks-office-phone-menu-system\/\">Updated Clerk\u2019s Office Phone Menu System<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/updated-clerks-office-phone-menu-system\/embed\/#?secret=oJrbnXW5UL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Updated Clerk\u2019s Office Phone Menu System” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"oJrbnXW5UL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Beginning July 15, 2019, the Clerk\u2019s Office has updated and expanded its automated public phone menu system and options.\u00a0 Callers to the main Clerk\u2019s Office phone number (202-275-8000) will hear new messages and prompts incorporating recent changes to information on our website.\u00a0 These changes will provide additional public information and allow for the faster and […]"}
EXHIBIT 10.7.1





AMENDMENT NUMBER 1


TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


For


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Citizens Bancshares of Southwest Florida, Inc. and Citizens National Bank of Southwest Florida (Employer) and Thomas Whelan
(Executive) hereby amend the Employment Agreement for Senior Lender entered into by and between the parties on April 28, 1999, as follows:





Section 2, Term, is hereby amended in its entirety to now read as follows:





Unless earlier terminated as set forth herein, the initial term of employment under this Agreement shall be for a period of three (3) years, commencing on April 28, 1999. At the end of this
initial three-year term and at the end of each subsequent three-year term thereafter, if any, unless either party gives the other party written notice of non-renewal of this Agreement by July 31st expiration date (and this Agreement is not, or has
not been, terminated sooner as provided herein), the term of this Agreement shall be automatically extended for an additional three-year term.





IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment Number 1 to Employment Agreement for Chief Financial Officer on July 30, 2001.





CITIZENS BANCSHARES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC.WitnessBy:

/s/    JOE B. COXJoe B. Cox Chairman of the
Board





Witness





CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDAWitnessBy:

/s/    JOE B. COXJoe B. Cox Chairman of the
Board





Witness





EXECUTIVE/s/    S. BrownWitnessBy:

/s/     Thomas M. WhelanThomas M. Whelan





Witness
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Public Notice Vacating Show Cause Order Concerning Paper Case Records - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4fJye5ieee\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/public-notice-vacating-show-cause-order-concerning-paper-case-records\/\">Public Notice Vacating Show Cause Order Concerning Paper Case Records<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/public-notice-vacating-show-cause-order-concerning-paper-case-records\/embed\/#?secret=4fJye5ieee\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Public Notice Vacating Show Cause Order Concerning Paper Case Records” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"4fJye5ieee\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Upon further consideration, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has rescinded its August 17, 2022 show cause order due to administrative impracticality.\u00a0 Any impacted parties, counsel, and other interested parties are excused from any existing requirement to show cause pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 25.1(a)(1). \u00a0All previously-identified cases will be transferred […]"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,003                  57,273
<RECEIVABLES>                               67,971,849              64,213,113
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                        302,660,752             263,939,939
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             370,647,604             328,210,325
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                  10,427,745              13,697,414
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 360,219,859             314,512,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               370,647,604             328,210,325
<TRADING-REVENUE>                          (5,234,619)              48,099,130
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                        17,854,409              12,766,955
<COMMISSIONS>                               28,008,137              19,086,026
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (20,600,448)              35,708,959
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                (20,600,448)              35,708,959
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (20,600,448)              35,708,959
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (8.86)                   20.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.86)                   20.57


</TABLE>
#### § 304-3.3 May my agency or I accept payment for travel expenses to a meeting from a non-Federal source?

Yes, you or your agency may accept such a payment from a non-Federal source, but you may only accept when your agency specifically authorizes such acceptance under the requirements of this part. Except as provided in § 304-3.13 of this part, your agency must approve acceptance of such payment in advance of your travel.
Docket No. FAA-2013-1032

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 6/6/12 -----

Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer 6/6/12 -----

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 6/6/12 -----

ATA M Lopez 6/6/12 -----
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.294 Oppositions and replies. ( a ) Any party to a hearing proceeding may file an opposition to an interlocutory request filed in that proceeding.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section or as otherwise ordered by the presiding officer, oppositions to interlocutory requests shall be filed within 4 days after the original pleading is filed, and replies to oppositions will not be entertained.
( c ) Additional pleadings may be filed only if specifically requested or authorized by the person(s) who is to make the ruling.
[85 FR 63179, Oct. 6, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 2.301 Station identification requirement.

Each station using radio frequencies shall identify its transmissions according to the procedures prescribed by the rules governing the class of station to which it belongs with a view to the elimination of harmful interference and the general enforcement of applicable radio treaties, conventions, regulations, arrangements, and agreements in force, and the enforcement of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the Commission's rules.

[34 FR 5104, Mar. 12, 1969]