alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2,742,662
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  588,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    153,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,848,409
<PP&E>                                         976,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,826,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,270,885
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21,360
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,583,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,478,265
<SALES>                                        1,309,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,361,964
<CGS>                                          437,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,347,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (110,960)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,311,531)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,311,531)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,311,531)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.11)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,616]


Chavez Signs, Incorporated, El Paso, Texas; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on April 24, 2000, in response to a petition filed by a 
company official on behalf of workers at Chavez Signs, Incorporated, El 
Paso, Texas.
    The company official submitting the petition has requested that the 
petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case 
would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 13th day of June, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-16498 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the eighth meeting of the American Health Information Community Chronic Care Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S., App.).

# DATES:

August 16, 2006 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​bio_​main.html.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast at                     *http://www.eventcenterlive.com/​cfmx/​ec/​login/​login1.cfm?​BID=​67.*

Dated: July 25, 2006.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 06-6661 Filed 8-2-06; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4177 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4177

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

           September 27 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 1601 
   Highway 35 in Middletown, New Jersey, as the ``Candace White Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 1601 Highway 35 
in Middletown, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the 
``Candace White Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Candace White Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA-2012-0801 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-106-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? (You might need to submit a separate 

record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “Ex Parte Contacts.”)

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE

Boeing Fritz Soedel 4/30/12 No response.

Airlines For 

America

Mike Bianchi 5/1/12 No response.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information:
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 23
                                   ----------


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
---------------------------------------------------

We have issued our report dated April 9, 2003 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of National Auto
Credit, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2003.
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of National Auto Credit, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
2-93984, effective October 1, 1987, File No. 33-51727, effective December 28,
1993, and File No. 33-58579, effective May 31, 1995).

/s/Grant Thornton, LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
April 9, 2003
#### § 22.217 Bidding credit for small businesses.

A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in § 22.223(b)(1), or a consortium of small businesses may use a bidding credit of thirty-five (35) percent to lower the cost of its winning bid. A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in § 22.223(b)(2), or consortium of small businesses may use a bidding credit of twenty-five (25) percent to lower the cost of its winning bid.

[68 FR 42998, July 21, 2003]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7681** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ERNEST STERLING WRIGHT, a/k/a Petey Wise , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News . Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 4:96

- cr - 00022

- RAJ

- 2 )

Submitted : March 9, 2015 Decided: March 13, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Ernest Sterling Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit
.2 PER CURIAM: Ernest Sterling Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253( c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the di strict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wright has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 11-9875.

#### Almly *v.*United States.

C. A. llth Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.724 Complaints governed by section 208(b)(1) of the Act. ( a ) Any party that intends to file a complaint subject to the 5-month deadline in 47 U.S.C. 208(b)(1) must comply with the pre-complaint procedures below. The Enforcement Bureau's Market Disputes Resolution Division will not process complaints subject to the 5-month deadline unless the filer complies with these procedures.
( b ) A party seeking to file a complaint subject to 47 U.S.C. 208(b)(1) shall notify the Chief of the Market Disputes Resolution Division in writing of its intent to file the complaint, and provide a copy of the letter to the defendant. Commission staff will convene a conference with both parties as soon as practicable. During that conference, the staff may discuss, among other things: ( 1 ) Scheduling in the case;
( 2 ) Narrowing factual and legal issues in dispute;
( 3 ) Information exchange and discovery necessary to adjudicate the dispute;
( 4 ) Entry of a protective order governing confidential material; and
( 5 ) Preparation for and scheduling a mandatory settlement negotiation session at the Commission.
( c ) Staff will endeavor to complete the pre-complaint process as expeditiously as possible. Staff may direct the parties to exchange relevant information during the pre-complaint period.
[83 FR 44832, Sept. 4, 2018]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Bank of Florida Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Tracy L. Keegan, Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                             |  |                    
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | -------------------
|Date: November 2, 2009 |  |  |  | By:                         |  | /s/ Tracy L. Keegan
|                       |  |  |  | Tracy L. Keegan,           
|                       |  |  |  | Principal Financial Officer
### Coca Cola to narrowly miss HFC-free global refrigeration target 

# INews 

# I Refrigeration an... Page 1 of 1

• Register now • Marketing 

### & Advert1srng Solutions • Sign in REFRIGERATION AND AHl CONDITIONING MAGAZlNE



# Your browser is no longer supported For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser. Close 

# Coca Cola to narrowly miss HFC-free global refrigeration target 20 March 

### 2015 1 By Andrew Gaved Soft drinks giant will miss its target, set in 

### 2009 for including natural refrigerants in all new equipment globally by 4 per cent, Coca Cola will narrowly fail to reach its ambitious target of only using natural refrigerants - primari ly carbon dioxide, but also hydrocarbons- i n all its new vending machines globally by 

### 2015. The manufacturer's sustainable refrigeration manager Antoine A:z.ar told the audience at the Atmosphere conference in Brussels that there remained a 4 per cent 'technology gap' in the smallest vending machine sizes. The drinks giant now has 1.4 million HFC-free vending machines, a 

### 20 per cent rise over the previous year, Mr Azar said, with 78 per cent of models performing more efficiently than HFC units, However, Mr Azar was confident the gap would be closed soon "There are definitely no peformance problems with C02 technology in any climate," he said, "We are not facing any major issues with servicing the new equipment either.". For the very smallest equipment, Coca Cola is looking at thermo-electric cooling, Mr Azar said. 

### "It uses no refrigerant, so it has fewe r breakdowns, and it is very quiet. The only downside is its energy efficiency." Coca Cola is part of the Refrigerants Naturally alliance of manufacturers, which has made public commitments to exiting HFCs .. Both Coca Cola and Red Bull confirmed at the conference that they would not consider HFOs within their scope of being HFC-free. 

# Related images • • Sign up to the RAC weekly newsletter

**f~r** the latest headlines Print 

### http: //www.racplus.com/news /coca-cola -to-narrowly-miss-hfc
-free-global
-refrigeration-

### tar.. . 3/26/20 15
§ 202.2 Criteria and guidance. NS/EP planning in government and industry with respect to effective conservation and use of surviving telecommunications resources in a disaster, emergency or postattack period must provide for orderly and uninhibited restoration of services by the carriers and authoritative control of services allocation which will assure that priority will be afforded the most critical needs of government and the private sector with respect to these objectives. ( a ) The preservation of the integrity of characteristics and capabilities of the Nation's telecommunications systems and networks during wartime or non-wartime emergencies is of the utmost importance. This can best be accomplished by centralized policy development, planning, and broad direction. Detailed operations management will remain decentralized in order to retain flexibility in the use of individual systems in responding to the needs of national security, survival and recovery. Each Federal agency responsible for telecommunications systems operations, and the carriers, are responsible for planning with respect to emergency operations. Guidance in this matter has been issued from a number of sources and contained in: ( 1 ) Annex C-XI (Telecommunications), Federal Emergency Plan D (Classified).
( 2 ) National Plan for Telecommunications Support in Non-wartime Emergencies.
( 3 ) The National Communications System Management Plan for Annex C-XI (Telecommunications) Federal Emergency Plan D (Classified).
( b ) The continuity of essential communications services will be maintained through the use of controls and operational procedures to assure that priority is given to vital services. NS/EP telecommunications services entail policies, procedures and responsibilities as described in parts 211 and 213 of this chapter.
( c ) The Nation's telecommunications systems facilities are vulnerable to physical and radiological damage. Planning factors with respect to the resumption of services in a disaster or postattack period must consider the probable loss of facilities which formerly provided direct and/or alternate intercity services among surviving population centers. Since surviving areas and population centers would serve as the sources of support to crippled areas of the Nation, the resumption of services between and among surviving metropolitan areas will be a high priority with the carriers.
§ 211.6 Submission and processing of restoration priority requests. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided below, all requests for restoration priority assignments will be submitted to the Executive Agent in the format prescribed by him for processing and certification.
( b ) Priority 3 and 4 applications from county and municipal governments, quasi-state and local government agencies and private entities shall be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission for its approval and for certification to the carriers. These submissions will be in the form prescribed by the Commission.
( c ) Industrial/Commercial entities designated for prearranged voluntary participation with the Federal Government in a national emergency should submit separate applications to the Commission when requesting the assignment of priorities in category 1 or 2. Such assignments will require the approval of the National Security Council in order to continue to be effective during a war emergency. In all cases the justification for restoration priorities will contain a validation statement from the Government agency with whom participation is prearranged.
( d ) Requests for restoration priority assignments made by Foreign Government agencies, except for NATO, NATO national military authority, and such other requests as the Executive Agent may be designated, will be submitted to the Department of State for initial evaluation and review. The Department will forward to the Executive Agent for processing and approval such of these requests as it finds acceptable.
( e ) Requests for restoration priority assignments made by NATO, NATO national military authority, and such other requests as the Executive Agent may designate, will be forwarded through established Allied Long Lines Agency (ALLA) channels to the Secretary of Defense. The Secretary will forward to the Executive Agent for processing and approval such of these requests as he finds acceptable pursuant to approved NATO/U.S. procedures.
( f ) Requests for temporary upgrading of restoration priority assignments occasioned by special critical conditions, including natural disasters, heightened diplomatic and political tenseness, and tracking and control of manned space operations, may be submitted to the Executive Agent together with such information as he may require for expedited processing decision.
( g ) All assignments, denials and changes of restoration priorities and subpriorities are subject to review and modification by the National Security Council.
( h ) When requesting service from the carriers the user must include the certified restoration priority on the service authorization.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 10B
                                                                     -----------

                                 Amendment No. 1

                                     to the

                       AMERICAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES INC.
                        1995 EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION PLAN



                  WHEREAS, American Precision Industries Inc. (the "Company")
adopted the American Precision Industries Inc. 1995 Employees Stock Option Plan
(the "Plan") effective December 16, 1994, and

                  WHEREAS, Section 2(e) of the Plan authorizes the Board of
Directors of the Company (the "Board") to amend the Plan in its discretion,
except to the extent approval of the Company's shareholders would be required by
law, and

                  WHEREAS, on April 24, 1998, the Board approved and authorized
the amendment to the Plan set out below,

                  NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

                  1. A new Article II(g) is added to the Plan to read as
follows:

                                     (g)(i) Except as provided in Article
                        II(g)(ii), the Committee may delegate its authority and
                        discretion under Article II(c) and (d), Article III, and
                        Article V(b), (d)(ii), (e) of the Plan to a second
                        committee composed of the Chief Executive Officer, the
                        Chief Financial Officer, and the Vice-President-Human
                        Resources of the Company.

                                     (ii) The Committee shall not delegate its
                        authority and discretion with respect to matters
                        relating to Options granted or to be granted to officers
                        of the Company or a Subsidiary who are subject to
                        Section 16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                        amended.

<PAGE>   2



                  2. This amendment is effective April 24, 1998.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this document is executed this 24th day
of July, 1998, pursuant to the authorization of the Board of Directors.




                                         AMERICAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES INC.



                                         By /s/ John M. Murray
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Vice President-Finance and Treasurer


                                       2
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Year-to-Date Activity 

as of January 31, 2014

Court or Agency of Origin

Pending as of 

10/01/13

Docketed 

10/01/13 to date

Terminated 

10/01/13 to date

Currently 

Pending 

Boards of Contract Appeals 8 9 4 13

Court of Federal Claims 119 48 54 113

Court of International Trade 55 13 12 56

Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 104 52 65 91

District Courts 438 196 143 491

Department of Justice 2 2 0 4

Department of Veterans Affairs 1 0 0 1

International Trade Commission 19 5 8 16

Merit Systems Protection Board 104 69 81 92

Office of Personnel Management 0 0 0 0

Office of Compliance 0 2 0 2

Patent & Trademark Office 118 64 56 126

Writs 15 18 16 17

TOTAL 983 478 439 1022