alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Reports & Statistics - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0qpus2Cy2L\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/reports-statistics\/\">Reports & Statistics<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/reports-statistics\/embed\/#?secret=0qpus2Cy2L\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Reports & Statistics” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"0qpus2Cy2L\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Current and historical statistical data reports on the business of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit are available below. Back to Top"}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Finance Docket No. 33886] 

                    Arizona & California Railroad Company Limited Partnership (ARZC) d/b/a Puget Sound & Pacific Railroad Company (PS&P),[1]                                          has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to lease and operate approximately 1.8 miles of certain rail lines from the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) as follows: (1) From UP milepost 53.83 to UP milepost 54.23; and (2) from UP milepost 55.28 to UP milepost 56.70, in Aberdeen and Hoquiam Counties, WA.                 

The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or after June 26, 2000. 

                    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void                     *ab initio.*                     Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.                 

An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 33886, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be served on Rose-Michele Weinryb, Esq,, Weiner, Brodsky, Sidman & Kider, P.C., 1300 19th Street, NW., Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20036-1609. 

Board decisions and notices are available on our website at “WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.” 

Decided: June 29, 2000.

By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings. 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             ARZC is an existing Class III rail carrier, and PS&P is an operating division of ARZC. See Arizona & California Railroad Company Limited Partnership—Acquisition and Operation Exemption—The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, STB Finance Docket No. 33448 (STB served Sept. 11, 1997).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-17121 Filed 7-6-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Operating Status Advisory Concerning the February 2021 Court Session - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LS2GuNO35p\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/operating-status-advisory-concerning-the-february-2021-court-session\/\">Operating Status Advisory Concerning the February 2021 Court Session<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/operating-status-advisory-concerning-the-february-2021-court-session\/embed\/#?secret=LS2GuNO35p\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Operating Status Advisory Concerning the February 2021 Court Session” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"LS2GuNO35p\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"In the event of inclement weather during the February 2021 court session, all arguing counsel and members of the public are advised that all telephonic hearings will proceed as scheduled regardless of any Office of Personnel Management operating status change impacting the National Capital Region."}
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

AMARIN PHARMA, INC., AMARIN 

PHARMACEUTICALS IRELAND LIMITED,

Plaintiffs

EPA DRUG INITIATIVE II,

Movant-Appellant

v.

HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC., HIKMA 

PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, 

WEST-WARD PHARMACEUTICALS 

INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, DR. REDDY'S 

LABORATORIES, INC., DR. REDDY'S 

LABORATORIES, LTD.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2021-2024

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Nevada in Nos. 2:16-cv-02525-MMD-NJK, 2:16-

cv-02562-MMD-NJK, Judge Miranda M. Du.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

Case: 21-2024 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 02/15/2022
MICHAEL S. KASANOFF, I, Michael S. Kasanoff, LLC, 

Matawan, NJ, argued for movant-appellant.

 CHARLES B. KLEIN, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees Hikma Pharmaceuticals 

USA Inc., Hikma Pharmaceuticals International Limited, 

West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Limited. Also 

represented by CLAIRE A. FUNDAKOWSKI; ALISON MICHELLE 

KING, Chicago, IL; EIMERIC REIG-PLESSIS, San Francisco, 

CA.

 JAMES BARABAS, Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, 

LLP, Madison, NJ, argued for all defendants-appellees. 

Defendants-appellees Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Dr. 

Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. also represented by BETH C.

FINKELSTEIN, CONSTANCE HUTTNER, CAROLINE SUN. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

February 15, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-2024 Document: 55 Page: 2 Filed: 02/15/2022
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03978**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03978\03978_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03978\03978_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03978\03978_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03978\03978_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03978\03978_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03978\03978_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03978\03978_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03978\03978_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03978\Certification Statement Plant ID 03978.pdf Plant certification statement x 03978\Follow-up\AEP FC 03978 Part A Sec 2.1 update.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03978\Follow-up\AEP FC 03978 Part A Sec 8 update.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03978\Follow-up\EPA FC ICR review ques.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up x 03978\Follow-up\Questions for Steam Electric Questionnaire (Flint Creek Power Plant - Plant ID 03978)_011711.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 03978\Follow-up\Re Questions for Steam Electric Questionnaire (Flint Creek Power Plant - Plant ID 03978)_020411.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 03978\Supplemental Documents\03978_A5-2 Property BoundaryTopo.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03978\Supplemental Documents\03978_A5-3 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03978\Supplemental Documents\03978_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03978\Supplemental Documents\03978_D3-1 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 23.4

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation of
our report dated February 22, 2007 with respect to the consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended December 31,
2006 and the financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 2006, of Spar
Group Inc. and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2006.

| |                      
| | ---------------------
| | /s/ Nagesh Behl & Co.

New Delhi
February 22, 2007
§ 101.1107 Bidding credits for very small businesses, small businesses and entrepreneurs. ( a ) A winning bidder that qualifies as a very small business, as defined in § 101.1112, or a consortium of very small businesses may use a bidding credit of 45 percent to lower the cost of its winning bid.
( b ) A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in § 101.1112, or a consortium of small businesses may use a bidding credit of 35 percent to lower the cost of its winning bid.
( c ) A winning bidder that qualifies as an entrepreneur, as defined in § 101.1112, or a consortium of entrepreneurs may use a bidding credit of 25 percent to lower the cost of its winning bid.
( d ) The bidding credits referenced in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this section are not cumulative.
[68 FR 43002, July 21, 2003]
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greater Atlantic Financial Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David E. Ritter Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

A.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

B.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.



                                          By: /s/ David E. Ritter
                                              -------------------
                                              David E. Ritter
                                              Senior Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer


                                              Date: January 12, 2007
#### Mary A. Small et al. v. C. M. Sandall. *

Filed June 18, 1895.

No. 5887.

Review: Joint Assignments on Error: Practice. A joint assignment of errors in a-petition in error made by two or more-persons which is not good as to all who joined therein will be-overruled as to all. Gordon v. *Little,*41 Neb., 250, followed.

Error from the district court of York county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.

*George W. Bemis, for*plaintiffs in error.

*Harlan & Harlan, contra.*

*

A rehearing has been allowed.

Norval, C. J.

The defendant in error, C. M. Sandall, brought this action before a justice of the peace against Mary A. Small, one of the plaintiffs in error, to recover $5 on an account alleged to have been assigned to plaintiff by one Eroid. The bill of particulars was in the usual form, and defendant answered by a general denial. The plaintiff having recovered a judgment for the full amount of his claim, the defendant prosecuted an appeal to the district court, where judgment was again rendered against her and one J. M. Bell, the other plaintiff in error, who was the surety on the appeal undertaking, for the sum of $5.19, and cost of the action. The cause is brought to this court to obtain a review of the judgment by petition in error, Small and Bell joining in the assignment of errors, there being ten in number. The first is based upon the decision of the court in striking out certain paragraphs of the answer. The next four assignments relate to the refusal of the court to give certain instructions requested by Mrs. Small. The sixth *307and seventh relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Eighth, the verdict is contrary to law. Ninth, the court erred in overruling, the motion for a new trial. Tenth, the court erred in rendering a joint judgment against Mrs. Small and J. M. Bell, her bondsman.

It is obvious that Mr. Bell cannot have reviewed any of the alleged errors covered by the first nine assignments, since he did not except to any of the rulings therein complained of, nor did he join in the motion for a new trial, nor did he except to the overruling of the same. It is equally clear that Mrs. Small is not in a position to complain because judgment was rendered against her surety on the appeal bond. He alone could question the authority of the court to render a judgment against him in this action. The errors pointed out in the petition in error do not affect. Mrs. Small and Mr. Bell jointly, but severally; therefore,, the several assignments not being well taken as to each, must be denied as to both. *(Gordon v. Little,*41 Neb., 250.)

Judgment affirmed.
14eFR Part 39

14910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

1).1'b,

{Docket No. FAA-20IO"ir •..•**; :Directorate Identifiel'" 2010-NM-26o-AD;

1&';£7 J-Oi /-0(-/3

Amendment 39_"".'-(*; AD zt»9-u_**]

R1N Z12O-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R se .

airplanes, and Model C4-605R Variant F airplanes (Collectively called AJOO"{)OOsc

airplanes)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (fAA). Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

"

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

above. This AD results from maJ;ldatory continuing airworthiness information (MeA

SUMMARY~ We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products 1

-v/)~ 1/-0

".., "·"'0" I

A.W" ,lief

'y'j~~,,-

I

Ie. 1-t/O

IOf

• • • • • • •

originated by an aviation authorily of another country to identify and correct an unsa

;

During a routine maintenance check on an AJOO-600 aeroplane. the

operator found the pitch Imcoupling unit installed at an incorrect location.

The pitch uncoupling unit was inverted with the rod assembly.

After a complete inspection of all A300~600 aeroplanes of its fleet, the

operator identified the same incorrect insLallation on another aeroplane .

This condition, ifnot dcttcted and corrected, in combination with particular

failure modes, could lead to loss of control of the aeroplane during the takeoff

phase.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3352] 

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority of October 19, 1999, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Art and the Empire City, “ imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum, New York, NY from September 11, 2000 through January 7, 2001 is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44; 301-4th Street, SW, Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: June 22, 2000. 

William B. Bader, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 00-16767 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and statement of Operations found on pages F-3 and F-4 of the Company's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,169,252
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,215,251
<PP&E>                                         136,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                  82,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,279,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,166
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           373
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,238,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,279,545
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  997,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (874,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (874,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (874,193)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)




</TABLE>