alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4483 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4483

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit registered vendors 
to administer claims for refund of diesel fuel taxes paid on fuel used 
                           in certain buses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 1994

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit registered vendors 
to administer claims for refund of diesel fuel taxes paid on fuel used 
                           in certain buses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REGISTERED VENDORS TO ADMINISTER CLAIMS FOR REFUND OF DIESEL 
              FUEL TAXES PAID ON FUEL USED IN CERTAIN BUSES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 6427(l)(5) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to registered vendors to 
administer claims for refund of diesel fuel sold to farmers and State 
and local governments) is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of 
clause (i), by striking the period at the end of clause (ii) and 
inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the end the following new clause:
            ``(iii) as described in subsection (b)(1) (after the 
        application of subsection (b)(3)).''.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--The paragraph heading for paragraph (5) 
of section 6427(l) of such Code is amended by striking ``sold to'' and 
all that follows and inserting ``used by farmers, state and local 
governments, and certain buses.--''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to fuel purchased after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
§ 24.102 Service areas. Narrowband PCS service areas are nationwide, regional, and Major Trading Areas (MTAs), as defined in this section. MTAs are based on the Rand McNally 1992 Commercial Atlas & Marketing Guide, 123rd Edition, at pages 38-39 (MTA Map). Rand McNally organizes the 50 States and the District of Columbia into 47 MTAs. The MTA Map is available on the FCC's website at *www.fcc.gov/auctions* through the “Maps” submenu. ( a ) The nationwide service area consists of the fifty states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and United States Virgin Islands.
( b ) The regional service areas are defined as follows: ( 1 ) Region 1 (Northeast): The Northeast Region consists of the following MTAs: Boston-Providence, Buffalo-Rochester, New York, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh.
( 2 ) Region 2 (South): The South Region consists of the following MTAs: Atlanta, Charlotte-Greensboro-Greenville-Raleigh, Jacksonville, Knoxville, Louisville-Lexington-Evansville, Nashville, Miami-Fort Lauderdale, Richmond-Norfolk, Tampa-St. Petersburg-Orlando, and Washington-Baltimore; and, Puerto Rico and United States Virgin Islands.
( 3 ) Region 3 (Midwest): The Midwest Region consists of the following MTAs: Chicago, Cincinnati-Dayton, Cleveland, Columbus, Des Moines-Quad Cities, Detroit, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, Minneapolis-St. Paul, and Omaha.
( 4 ) Region 4 (Central): The Central Region consists of the following MTAs: Birmingham, Dallas-Fort Worth, Denver, El Paso-Albuquerque, Houston, Kansas City, Little Rock, Memphis-Jackson, New Orleans-Baton Rouge, Oklahoma City, San Antonio, St. Louis, Tulsa, and Wichita.
( 5 ) Region 5 (West): The West Region consists of the following MTAs: Honolulu, Los Angeles-San Diego, Phoenix, Portland, Salt Lake City, San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, Seattle (including Alaska), and Spokane-Billings; and, American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands.
( c ) The MTA service areas are based on the Rand McNally *1992 Commercial Atlas & Marketing Guide,* 123rd Edition, at pages 38-39, with the following exceptions and additions: ( 1 ) Alaska is separated from the Seattle MTA and is licensed separately.
( 2 ) Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands are licensed as a single MTA-like area.
( 3 ) Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands are licensed as a single MTA-like area.
( 4 ) American Samoa is licensed as a single MTA-like area.
[59 FR 14118, Mar. 25, 1994, as amended at 59 FR 46199, Sept. 7, 1994; 65 FR 35852, June 6, 2000; 85 FR 64407, Oct. 13, 2020]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Long-term monitoring at theEast and West Flower Garden Banks, 2004-2008**
 
SuDoc Number:I 72.12/2:2010-052

Item Number:0671-F (online)
CGP systemNumber:000864659
 
Volumes: 0102
 
May 5, 2020
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Inncardio, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report" ), the undersigned, Alan Bowen, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 20, 2005

By: /s/ Alan Bowen
   ------------------

Alan Bowen

CFO, Secretary, Treasurer & Director

(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Notice of Proposed Amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5z2qRuL2oh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-proposed-amendments-to-the-federal-circuit-rules-of-practice-2\/\">Notice of Proposed Amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-proposed-amendments-to-the-federal-circuit-rules-of-practice-2\/embed\/#?secret=5z2qRuL2oh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Proposed Amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"5z2qRuL2oh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2071(b) and Federal Circuit Rule 47(a), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit gives notice that it proposes to amend Federal Circuit Rules of Practice 26, 30, 31, 33, 33.1, 34, 39, and 47.6 and the Practice Notes to Rules 34, 42, 47.5, and 47.6.\u00a0 The proposed […]"}
No. 11-9782.

#### Rogers *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.3

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arthur V. Conover, III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


         c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):


         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and


6. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: August 12, 2004

/S/ ARTHUR V. CONOVER, III
--------------------------
Arthur V. Conover, III
Controller

                                       23



<PAGE>
No. 11-5237.

#### Poulson *v.*Pennsylvania Department of Probation and Parole.

Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 32(b)**

**ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Hendrx Corp. (“Registrant”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Cherry Cai, chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1)     This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of 

        operation of the Registrant. 

Date: August 9, 2006 

/s/ Cherry Cai

Cherry Cai 

Chief Financial Officer 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

**37**

----
#### § 25.134 [Reserved]
#10{)~ Q15D D005 Q:J.c:21 Q9'5 

.' 

OKLAHOMA 

DEPARTMENT Of ENVIRONMENTAL QUAliTY 

STEVEN A. THOMPSON BRAD HENRY

Executive Director OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 	 Governor

September 20, 2007 

Lafarge Building Materials 


Attn: Ms. Pamela Bennett 


2609 N. 145th East Avenue 


Tulsa, OK 74116 


Subject: 	 Best,Available Retro.fit Techno.lo.gy (BART) Waiver 


Lafarge Tulsa Cement Plant 


Dear Ms. Bennett: 

'. 	 '.: 

The Oklaho.ma Department o.fEnviro.nmental Quality (ODEQ) received a BART Waiver 

request fo.r the Lafarge Tulsa Cement Plant o.n December 1, 2006. 

The applicable e!p.issio.n rates to. use fo.r the Waivetprocess is the 24-ho.ur average actual 

emissio.ns fro.m the highest emitting day o.f the meteo.rolo.gica} ·perio.d mo.deled. The 

Waiver submittal, on page 4-2, indicates the units o.perated continuo.uslyover a single 24­

ho.ur perio.d dUring the 2001-2005 time frame and ~hat emissio.ns are based upo.n a full 24 

ho.urs o.peratio.n, Based o.n a review o.frecent emissio.n invento.ry data, the PMlO mo.deled 

rate fo.r EP15 (Kiln #2) appears to. be lo.wer than repo.rted. It also appears the PMlO mo.del 

input rate do.es no.t agree with the pro.po.sed 24-hr emissio.n rate fo.r EP 15. 

It sho.uld be no.ted that the invento.ry data is an annual average fo.r this Co.mpariso.n. 

Generally, it wo.uld be anticipated that the 24-hr average maximum daily rate wo.uld be 

higher than the 2004 invento.ry data. 

In o.rder to. co.mplete this review, please provide clarificatio.n/justificatio.n co.ncerning the 

identified issues within 30 days. Thank yo.u fo.r yo.ur co.o.peratio.n in this matter. If we 

may be o.ffurth~r service, please co.ntac~Phil1ip Fi~405) 702-4100. 

Sinc~ 

awso.n sse\1er, Chief Engineer 

AIR QU~ITY DIVISION 

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73101·1677 

printed on recycled paper with soy ink 

o
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000005657
<NAME> AMERICAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1997
<CASH>                                           1,827
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                       566
<INVENTORY>                                     23,235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,566
<PP&E>                                          59,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,500
<BONDS>                                         24,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,179
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,595
<SALES>                                         75,415     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,479   
<CGS>                                           51,869    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    62
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,083        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,922        
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,067               
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,855        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
<FN>
In thousands of dollars except per share amounts)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 26, 2000 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 26, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-2000
<CASH>                                           4,526
<SECURITIES>                                     6,641
<RECEIVABLES>                                      527
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,876
<PP&E>                                          30,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,261)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,994
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,598
<SALES>                                         19,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,929
<CGS>                                            5,865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (22)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    449
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (180)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                269
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       269
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION VII 901 NORTH 5TH STREET KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101

September 23, 2011

Wendy A Garzon

5646 South 22 Street Omaha, Nebraska 68107

RE: SAID: 1478

5646 South 22 Street
Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment

Dear Owner/Resident:

A Lead Based Paint assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as part of the Omaha Lead site investigation. The purpose of this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of LBP is present on the exterior surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc) exist that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels.

Enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 5646 South 22 Street. The EPA has developed paint stabilization eligibility criteria that involve measuring the amount of deteriorated LBP on a structure and calculating the concentration of lead in soils around the home that would result if all of the identified deteriorated paint were to fall to the ground and uniformly mix with the soil under certain assumptions. During the LBP assessment, the areal extent of the deteriorated paint observed on structure surfaces was estimated and the lead content in the deteriorated paint was measured using an X-Ray Fluorescence instrument.

The data obtained during the LBP assessment was used to estimate the increase in soil lead concentration that would result if all of the deteriorating paint identified in the assessment were to fall to the ground and mix with surface soil within six feet of the foundation of the structure. For purposes of this calculation, the deteriorating LBP on a structure is assumed to fall onto the ground surface within six feet of the foundation and be uniformly mixed with the top one inch of soil. The estimated lead concentration in the soil potentially caused by the deteriorating LBP provides a measure of the severity of LBP deterioration on individual structures. The EPA uses these criteria to rank properties based on the potential for recontamination of soil to occur. Paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LBP problems, particularly where children under the age of seven reside.

The LBP assessment performed by the EPA using the above criteria indicated that your house IS NOT eligible for paint stabilization.If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at (402) 731-3045.

Sincerely,

Pauletta R. France-Isetts Project Coordinator Environmental Protection Agency

Enclosures
Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045.Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment 

# l 

# llllll Il11 lllll llll Il1 Il1 14;

LEGEND: H


### - N


### - P 

### - 01 

### - 12345 Samples Analyzed

---BVID Number -Sample Number

---- Mater~al P = Pant

~de of Structure N = North S = South E = East W = West

Sample Number Concentration StructureiFeature Substrate Color Detenoratet
(Window, slding. porch, etc) (wood concrete etc ) Area