U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
                        COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-KSB
                [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                     FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
                                       or
                 [_] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                          Concierge Technologies, Inc.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

    Nevada                          333-38838                        95-4442384
    ------                          ---------                        ----------
  (state of                 (Commission File Number)               (IRS Employer
incorporation)                                                      I.D. Number)

                          22048 Sherman Way, Suite 301
                              Canoga Park, CA 91303
                                 (818) 610-0310
              ----------------------------------------------------
             (Address and telephone number of registrant's principal
               executive offices and principal place of business)

         Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

                           Title of each class: None.

                Name of each exchange on which registered: None.

         Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

                         Common Stock, $0.001 par value
                         ------------------------------
                                (Title of class)

     Check  whether  the issuer (1) filed all  reports  required  to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the  registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing  requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [_]

     Check if there is no disclosure  of  delinquent  filers in response to Item
405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form,  and no disclosure  will be
contained,  to the  best of  registrant's  knowledge,  in  definitive  proxy  or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X]

     Indicate  by check mark  whether  the  registrant  is a shell  company  (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes [X] No [_]

<PAGE>

State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year:  None.

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held
by non-affiliates  computed by reference to the price at which the common equity
was sold,  or the average bid and asked  price of such  common  equity,  as of a
specified  date within the past 60 days:  $595,676  computed by reference to the
$0.0075  average of the bid and asked  price of the  Company's  Common  Stock on
October 6, 2006.

     State the number of shares  outstanding of each of the issuer's  classes of
common equity, as of the latest  practicable date:  142,292,747 shares of Common
Stock, $0.001 par value, on October 6, 2006.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     If the following documents are incorporated by reference,  briefly describe
them and identify the part of the Form 10-KSB (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into
which the document is incorporated:  (1) any annual report to security  holders;
(3) any proxy or information statement; and (3) any prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b) or (c) of the Securities Act of 1933  ("Securities  Act").  The list
documents should be clearly described for identification  purposes (e.g., annual
report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1990). None.

    Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [_] No [X]















                                       2
<PAGE>

                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                            Page
                                                                            ----

Item 1.  Description of Business ..............................................1
         Business Development .................................................1
         Business of Concierge ................................................2
         Number of Employees ..................................................3

Item 2.  Description of Property ..............................................3
         Facilities ...........................................................4

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings ....................................................4

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
                           Holders ............................................4

Item 5.  Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder
                  Matters .....................................................5
         Holders ..............................................................5
         Dividends ............................................................5
         Penny Stock Regulations ..............................................6
               The Penny Stock Suitability Rule ...............................6
               The Penny Stock Disclosure Rule ................................7
               Effects of the Rule ............................................8
         Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities ..............................8

Item 6.  Management's Discussion and Analysis or
               Plan of Operations .............................................8
         Plan of Operations for the Next Twelve Months.........................9
         Liquidity ...........................................................10
         Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.......................................10

Item 7.  Financial Statements ................................................11

Item 8.  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants On
               Accounting and Financial Disclosure ...........................29

Item 8A. Controls and Procedures .............................................29

Item 8B. Other Information ...................................................29

Item 9.  Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and
               Control Persons; Compliance with
               Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act .............................29
         Audit Committee and Audit Committee
              Financial Expert ...............................................31
         Code of Ethics ......................................................31
         Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act ...................32

Item 10. Executive Compensation ..............................................32
         Long-Term Compensation ..............................................33

Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
               and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.................33

Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions ......................34

Item 13. Exhibits ............................................................34

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services ..............................35

Signatures ...................................................................37


                                       i
<PAGE>

                                     PART I

ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Business Development

     Concierge  Technologies,  Inc. was incorporated in California on August 18,
1993 as  "Fanfest,  Inc." On August 29, 1995 its name was  changed to  Starfest,
Inc.,  and on March 20,  2002 its name was changed to  "Concierge  Technologies,
Inc."

     Pursuant to a Stock Purchase  Agreement (the  "Purchase  Agreement")  dated
March 6, 2000 between MAS Capital, Inc., an Indiana corporation, the controlling
shareholder of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. ("MAS XX"), an Indiana corporation,  and
Starfest,  approximately  96.83 percent  (8,250,000  shares) of the  outstanding
shares of common stock of MAS  Acquisition XX Corp.  were exchanged for $100,000
and  150,000  shares of  common  stock of  Starfest  in a  transaction  in which
Starfest became the parent corporation of MAS XX.

     At the time of this  transaction,  the market  price of  Starfest's  common
stock was  $1.50 bid at  closing  on March 7,  2000 on the OTC  Bulletin  Board.
Accordingly,  the consideration Starfest paid for the 96.83 percent interest was
valued at $325,000.  Concierge  loaned to Starfest the $100,000  cash portion of
the consideration evidenced by a no-interest,  demand note. Michael Huemmer, the
president of Starfest,  loaned to Starfest the 150,000 shares of common stock of
Starfest that was the stock portion of the consideration.

     Upon  execution of the Purchase  Agreement and the  subsequent  delivery of
$100,000  cash and 150,000  shares of common stock of Starfest on March 7, 2000,
to MAS  Capital  Inc.,  pursuant  to Rule  12g-3(a)  of the  General  Rules  and
Regulations  of the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission,  Starfest  became the
successor  issuer to MAS  Acquisition XX Corp. for reporting  purposes under the
Securities  and  Exchange  Act of 1934  and  elected  to  report  under  the Act
effective March 7, 2000.

     MAS XX had no business,  no assets,  and no  liabilities at the time of the
transaction.  Starfest  entered into the  transaction  solely for the purpose of
becoming the successor issuer to MAS Acquisition XX Corp. for reporting purposes
under the 1934 Exchange Act. Prior to this  transaction,  Starfest was preparing
to  register  its  common  stock  with the  Commission  in order to avoid  being
delisted  by  the  OTC  Bulletin   Board.  By  engaging  in  the  Rule  12g-3(a)
transaction,  Starfest  avoided the  possibility  that its planned  registration
statement  with the Commission  would not be fully reviewed by the  Commission's
staff before an April 2000  deadline,  which would result in  Starfest's  common
stock being delisted on the OTC Bulletin Board.

     An agreement of merger was entered  into  between  Starfest and  Concierge,
Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation,  on January  26,  2000.  The  proposed  merger was
submitted to the  shareholders  of each of Starfest and Concierge  pursuant to a
Form S-4 Prospectus-Proxy Statement filed with the Commission.


                                       1
<PAGE>

     As  described  in  Starfest's  Form 8-K  filed on  April 2,  2002  with the
Commission  (Commission  File No.  000-29913),  the shareholders of Starfest and
Concierge did approve the merger,  and the merger was legally  effected on March
20, 2002.

          Pursuant to the agreement of merger between Starfest and Concierge,

     o    Starfest was the surviving corporation,

     o    The  shareholders  of Concierge  received pro rata for their shares of
          common  stock of  Concierge,  99,957,713  shares  of  common  stock of
          Starfest in the merger,  and all shares of capital  stock of Concierge
          were cancelled,

     o    The fiscal year-end of the corporation was changed to June 30,

     o    The  officers  and  directors  of  Concierge  became the  officers and
          directors of Starfest, and

     o    The name of Starfest was changed to "Concierge Technologies, Inc."

Business of Concierge Technologies

     As of June 30, 2006,  the Company has  abandoned  its efforts to market the
software application product known as the Personal  Communications  Attendant or
"PCA".  The product was conceived in 1996 and produced in 2000. Due to a lack of
marketing funds, continued product development and a rapidly changing technology
industry, management has determined that the existing PCA no longer has a viable
market presence.  Efforts to retail the product on the company website have been
unproductive;  however,  a purchaser for the bulk of the remaining 14,700 pieces
still in inventory will be sought.

     On May 5, 2004 we  acquired  all of the  outstanding  and issued  shares of
Planet Halo, a privately held Nevada  corporation.  Planet Halo's assets include
intellectual  property  related to the  industrial  design,  mechanical  design,
operation  and  know-how to market a wireless,  hand-held,  cellular  phone with
integrated  QWERTY  keypad,  color  screen and voice  activation  software.  The
device,  known as the "Halo", had been advanced to the beta-test phase and there
exists four working prototypes. In addition to the Halo, Planet Halo also has an
exclusive North American  license to exploit a wireless gateway that acts as the
interface  between wireless devices,  including the Halo, and the Internet.  The
gateway,  branded  as  "Halomail",  uses  secure  socket  layer  technology  for
encrypted financial transactions,  email access, desktop synchronization,  HTML,
XML,  SHTML,  WAP and other  Web-based  functions  that are  enabled  on devices
running  the  Halomail  software  client.  We intend to assist  Planet Halo with
placement of the Halomail into active commercial service within the near term.

     Management  has also  initiated  a  strategy  of  vertical  integration  of
development stage, wireless, companies into Concierge. We believe that should we
be able to accumulate a sufficient  market  potential  through  combined product
offerings  we may be more  successful  in  sourcing  needed  capital to fund the
execution and expansion of our overall business plan. That plan as of October 6,


                                       2
<PAGE>

2006 is to seek and  acquire,  through  issuance  of equity,  development  stage
operating  companies which have a synergistic  relationship to our  intellectual
properties  and  will  provide  a  revenue  stream  to the  Company.  We have no
assurances  that such a  strategy  will  ultimately  be  successful  or that the
addition of product lines and intellectual  properties will create the favorable
environment for investors that we anticipate;  however,  we plan to continue the
creation of value for our shareholders through acquisitions and partnerships. As
this process  continues,  we also hope to begin  commercial  operations with the
Halomail and source a buyer for the PCA inventory,  thus  generating  sufficient
funds to, in part, offset our cash expenditures.

     Governmental  Approval of Principal Products.  No governmental  approval is
required in the U.S. for Concierge's products.

     Government Regulations.  There are no governmental  regulations in the U.S.
that apply to Concierge's products.

     Dependence on Major Customers and Suppliers.  Concierge does not anticipate
that it will be dependent on any major customers or suppliers.

     Seasonality.  There should be no seasonal  aspect to  Concierge's  business
other than possible  increased sales  anticipated in the fourth calendar quarter
associated with the year-end holidays.

     Research  and  Development.  Concierge  expended no funds on  research  and
development in 2006.

     Environmental  Controls.  Concierge is subject to no environmental controls
or restrictions  that require the outlay of capital or the obtaining of a permit
in order to engage in business.

     Patents,  Trademarks,  Copyrights and Intellectual Property.  Concierge has
trademarked  its  Personal  Communications  Attendant.  It has no patents on the
product. Planet Halo has trademarked the names "Halo",  "Halomail",  and "Planet
Halo". Patent applications are pending on certain aspects of the Halo device and
software  applications  that enable certain of its  functionality.  The know-how
centered around the programming,  low-level drivers, key board matrix, operating
system  interface and certain  other  aspects of the Halo device,  including its
industrial design, are considered a valued intellectual property of Planet Halo.

     Number of Employees

     On June 30,  2006,  we  employed no persons  full time and no persons  part
time.

ITEM 2.  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

     We own no plants, real property or any significant personal property.


                                       3
<PAGE>

Facilities

     Our office  facilities are co-located with those of our president and chief
operations officer, David Neibert, at 22048 Sherman Way, Suite 301, Canoga Park,
CA 91303.  We have no lease and  currently pay no rent. In the event we are able
to secure the additional funds required to further our business plan, the shared
office space consisting of approximately  880 square feet,  including  furniture
and  fixtures,  can be  leased by us for the  amount  of  $1,235  per month on a
one-year lease.  Should additional space be needed,  there is ample office space
available in the vicinity at competitive prices.

     Planet Halo has no separate office facilities.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     On May 6, 2002, a default judgment was awarded to Brookside Investments Ltd
against,  jointly and severally,  our company,  Allen E. Kahn, and The Whitehall
Companies in the amount of $135,000 plus interest and legal fees.  Concierge did
not defend against the complaint by Brookside,  which alleged that Brookside was
entitled  to a refund of its  investment  as a result  of a breach of  contract.
Brookside had entered into a subscription  agreement with  Concierge,  Inc. that
called for,  among  other  things,  the  pending  merger  between  Starfest  and
Concierge to be completed within 180 days of the investment.  The merger was not
completed within 180 days and Brookside sought a refund of its investment, which
Concierge was unable to provide.

     As of October 6, 2006, Brookside has not attempted to enforce its judgment.
As of October 6, 2006,  we are unable to pay the amount of the judgment and have
no assets available to Brookside for liquidation in settlement of the judgment.

     Neither  Concierge  Technologies  nor any of its property is the subject of
any other  pending  legal  proceedings  or any  proceeding  that a  governmental
authority is contemplating.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     In an effort to  improve  the  corporate  vehicle to better  accommodate  a
merger or acquisition,  the decision was made by the directors to re-domesticate
the  corporation  in the State of  Nevada.  During  the month of May 2005 a vote
regarding  the  move  to  Nevada  was  solicited  from a group  of  shareholders
comprising a majority.  A majority vote in favor was received and an Information
Statement was subsequently sent to all shareholders detailing the action.

     On  October  5, 2006 the  Articles  of Merger  were filed with the State of
California and Concierge Technologies,  Inc., a California  corporation,  merged
with a  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  also named  Concierge  Technologies,  Inc., a
Nevada corporation.  The Nevada corporation is the surviving  corporation in the
merger. The charters of the two corporations are essentially identical,  and the
transaction was effected as no more than a change of domicile from California to
Nevada..  There are no changes to the bylaws, the number of shares  outstanding,
or the  restrictions  applicable  to trading in the company stock that would not
otherwise exist as if the company had not completed its move to Nevada.


                                       4
<PAGE>

                                     PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

     Our Common Stock presently  trades on the OTC Bulletin Board.  The high and
low bid prices, as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board, are as follows for fiscal
years ended June 30, 2005 and 2006. The quotations reflect  inter-dealer prices,
without retail  mark-up,  mark-down or commission  and may not represent  actual
transactions.

                                         High              Low
                                         ----              ---
         Calendar 2004:
               3rd Qtr.                  0.020             0.0100
               4th Qtr.                  0.012             0.0075

         Calendar 2005
               1st Qtr.                  0.012             0.006
               2nd Qtr.                  0.009             0.006
               3rd Qtr.                  0.019             0.006
               4th Qtr.                  0.010             0.005

         Calendar 2006
               1st Qtr.                  0.030             0.005
               2nd Qtr.                  0.016             0.010

Holders

     On June 30,  2006 there  were  approximately  325  holders of record of our
common stock.

Dividends

     We have had no  earnings  and have  declared  no  dividends  on our capital
stock. Under California law, a company - such as our company - can pay dividends
only

     o    from retained earnings, or

     o    if after the dividend is made,

     o    its tangible  assets would equal at least 11/4 times its  liabilities,
          and

          o    its current assets would at least equal its current  liabilities,
               or

          o    if the average of its  earnings  before  income  taxes and before
               interest  expenses  for the last  two  years  was  less  than the


                                       5
<PAGE>

               average of its interest expenses for the last two years, then its
               current  assets  must be equal to at least 11/4 times its current
               liabilities.

     The  directors'  strategy on dividends is to declare and pay dividends only
from retained  earnings and when the  directors  deem it prudent and in the best
interests of the company to declare and pay dividends.

Penny Stock Regulations

     Our common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board at a price less than $5 a
share and is subject to the rules governing "penny stocks."

     A "penny stock" is any stock that:

     o    sells for less than $5 a share.

     o    is not listed on an exchange or authorized for quotation on The Nasdaq
          Stock Market, and

     o    is  not  a  stock  of  a  "substantial  issuer."  We  are  not  now  a
          "substantial  issuer" and cannot become one until we have net tangible
          assets of at least $2 million.

     There  are  statutes  and   regulations  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  (the  "Commission")  that  impose a strict  regimen on brokers  that
recommend penny stocks.

     The Penny Stock Suitability Rule
     --------------------------------

     Before  a  broker-dealer  can  recommend  and  sell a penny  stock to a new
customer who is not an institutional accredited investor, the broker-dealer must
obtain  from  the  customer   information   concerning  the  person's  financial
situation,   investment   experience  and  investment   objectives.   Then,  the
broker-dealer must "reasonably  determine" (1) that transactions in penny stocks
are suitable for the person and (2) that the person, or his advisor,  is capable
of evaluating the risks in penny stocks.

     After  making  this  determination,  the  broker-dealer  must  furnish  the
customer with a written  statement  setting forth the basis for this suitability
determination.  The customer must sign and date a copy of the written  statement
and return it to the broker-dealer.

     Finally the  broker-dealer  must also  obtain  from the  customer a written
agreement to purchase the penny stock,  identifying  the stock and the number of
shares to be purchased.

     The  above  exercise  delays  a  proposed   transaction.   It  causes  many
broker-dealer  firms to adopt a policy of not allowing their  representatives to
recommend penny stocks to their customers.

     The Penny Stock  Suitability  Rule,  described  above,  and the Penny Stock
Disclosure Rule, described below, do not apply to the following:


                                       6
<PAGE>

     o    transactions not recommended by the broker-dealer,

     o    sales to institutional accredited investors,

     o    transactions  in which the  customer is a director,  officer,  general
          partner, or direct or indirect beneficial owner of more than 5 percent
          of any class of equity  security of the issuer of the penny stock that
          is the subject of the transaction, and

     o    transactions in penny stocks by broker-dealers whose income from penny
          stock  activities  does not exceed five  percent of their total income
          during certain defined periods.

     The Penny Stock Disclosure Rule
     -------------------------------

     Another  Commission  rule - the Penny  stock  Disclosure  Rule - requires a
broker-dealer,  who  recommends  the sale of a penny  stock to a  customer  in a
transaction not exempt from the suitability rule described above, to furnish the
customer  with a "risk  disclosure  document."  This  document is set forth in a
federal regulation and contains the following information:

     o    A statement that penny stocks can be very risky,  that investors often
          cannot sell a penny stock back to the dealer that sold them the stock,

     o    A warning that salespersons of penny stocks are not impartial advisers
          but are paid to sell the stock,

     o    The statement  that federal law requires the  salesperson  to tell the
          potential investor in a penny stock -

          o    the "offer" and the "bid" on the stock, and

          o    the  compensation  the  salesperson and his firm will receive for
               the trade,

     o    An  explanation  that  the  offer  price  and  the bid  price  are the
          wholesale  prices at which  dealers  are  willing  to sell and buy the
          stock from other  dealers,  and that in its trade with a customer  the
          dealer may add a retail charge to these wholesale prices,

     o    A warning that a large spread  between the bid and the offer price can
          make the resale of the stock very costly,

     o    Telephone numbers a person can call if he or she is a victim of fraud,

     o    Admonitions -

          o    to use caution when investing in penny stocks,

          o    to understand the risky nature of penny stocks,


                                       7
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

          o    to know the brokerage firm and the  salespeople  with whom one is
               dealing, and

          o    to be cautious if ones salesperson leaves the firm.

Finally,  the customer  must be  furnished  with a monthly  statement  including
prescribed  information relating to market and price information  concerning the
penny stocks held in the customer's account.

     Effects of the Rule
     -------------------

     The above penny stock  regulatory  scheme is a response by the Congress and
the Commission to known abuses in the telemarketing of low-priced  securities by
"boiler shop" operators.  The scheme imposes market  impediments on the sale and
trading of penny stocks. It has a limiting effect on a stockholder's  ability to
resell a penny stock.

     Our shares likely will trade below $5 a share on the OTC Bulletin Board and
be, for some time at least,  shares of a "penny  stock"  subject to the  trading
market impediments described above.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Outstanding Stock Options

     Our company sold the  following  shares of its common stock during the last
three years without registering the shares:

------------------- ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------
                                                                                                Value of
       Date          No. of Shares        Name of Purchaser         Type of Consideration     Consideration
------------------- ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------
<S>                 <C>              <C>                         <C>                         <C>
------------------- ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------
November 12, 2003     1,000,000       Frank Ramogida              Cash                        $ 10,000
------------------- ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------
January 7, 2004       4,000,000       Ryan Consult Ltd.           Services                    $216,000
------------------- ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------
February 19, 2004     1,000,000       Marc Angell Trust           Cash                        $ 10,000
------------------- ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------
May 6, 2004          10,000,000       Planet Halo Shareholders    Share-for-Share Exchange    $500,000
------------------- ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------
</TABLE>

     All  of  the  above  sales  were  made  pursuant  to  the  exemption   from
registration provided by the Commission's Regulation D, Rule 506. All purchasers
were  either  accredited  investors  or,  if not,  were  provided  copies of the
company's  recent filings with the  Commission  including  financial  statements
meeting the  requirements  of the  Commission's  Item 310 of Regulation S-B. All
purchasers  were  provided  the  opportunity  to ask  questions  of  Concierge's
management.

     No equity of  Concierge  is subject to  outstanding  options or warrants to
purchase, or securities convertible into, equity of the company.

ITEM 6.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

     The following  discussion and analysis  should be read in conjunction  with
the financial  statements and the accompanying notes thereto and is qualified in
its  entirety  by the  foregoing  and by  more  detailed  financial  information
appearing elsewhere. See "Financial Statements."


                                       8
<PAGE>

Plan of Operation for the Next Twelve Months

     Our plan of operation for the next twelve months is to do the following:

          o    exploit the opportunities  afforded us through our acquisition of
               Planet  Halo by  implementing  a sales  strategy  to  deploy  the
               wireless gateway, Halomail, on synergistic networks,

          o    properly   position  the   corporation   and  its   structure  to
               accommodate a business combination with a funding partner,

          o    engage the assistance of our directors and outside consultants to
               aggressively  pursue acquisition targets in the field of wireless
               communications.

     On April 6, 2004, our company signed a definitive  agreement to acquire the
privately-held company, Planet Halo, in a cash-free stock transaction.  On April
20, 2004 the  companies  completed  the  necessary  documentation  to effect the
acquisition. On May 5, 2004 Concierge Technologies instructed its transfer agent
to issue the  purchase  price in shares of common stock to the  shareholders  of
Planet Halo. The  transaction  was officially  closed and the shares  considered
issued as of May 5, 2004.

     Planet Halo is a development-stage  company that has developed a prototype,
hand-held,  wireless  Internet  appliance named the "Halo".  The Halo is able to
send and receive email,  short messages,  run applications such as address book,
calculator,   scheduler,  etc  and  operates  as  a  fully  functional  cellular
telephone.  In  addition to the Halo  device  Planet Halo also has an  exclusive
license to deploy a proprietary  wireless gateway in North America. The gateway,
named  "Halomail",  provides  a secure  interface  for  wireless  access  to the
Internet,  and to the worldwide web. Users of the Halo or other wireless devices
may use  Halomail  as their  email  client,  a secure  connection  for  monetary
transactions,  browse the worldwide  web,  connect to their own  Intranets,  and
essentially use the gateway as a secure on-ramp to the Internet in much the same
way as a wired connection operates. Concierge plans to move the Halo device into
production readiness and to seek partners for the launch of the Halomail gateway
on service provider networks.

     Planet Halo will  continue to be operated by its  President,  Marc  Angell.
Concierge  Technologies has not approved an operating budget for Planet Halo and
is  currently  reliant  upon Marc Angell to  continue  providing  his  services,
including personal operating expenses,  for the near term. There is no assurance
that this situation will endure for the long term, or that Concierge will not be
required to fund its operations in the near future.

     On June  17,  2002,  David  W.  Neibert  became  our  President  and  Chief
Operations Officer. Upon assuming that role, he moved the general accounting and
administrative offices of our company to a co-location with his firm, The Wallen
Group.  We do not currently pay rent and have no lease for the facilities  being
provided by Mr. Neibert.


                                       9
<PAGE>

     As of June 30, 2005, we had no employees and no fixed  overhead  other than
the variable cost of web hosting,  legal and professional  fees, fees charged by
our transfer agent and minimum tax payments.  We have a limited amount of office
fixtures,  furniture  and  computer  equipment  acquired  with the  Planet  Halo
transaction.  Our president, the president of Planet Halo, our CEO and directors
are continuing to provide services without cash compensation;  however,  on July
19, 2006 Chairman  Allen Kahn polled the directors and received a unanimous vote
in favor of issuing Five Million  (5,000,000) shares of stock to compensate Ryan
Consultants  Ltd, a Jersey,  UK corporation,  which has provided the services of
David Neibert for the previous two years,  incurred expenses on our behalf,  and
performed other supportive  roles in our fund raising efforts.  As of October 6,
2006 the shares of stock have not been issued,  but will be issued as soon as it
is practical to do so. There are no guarantees that Mr. Neibert will continue to
act as our Chief Operating  Officer beyond the current fiscal year, or that Ryan
Consultants will continue to compensate Mr. Neibert if he chooses to continue to
perform his fiduciary  duties,  or that he will continue in his capacity without
compensation.

Liquidity

     Our primary source of operating  capital has been funding  sourced  through
insiders or shareholders  under the terms of unsecured  promissory notes. In two
instances  we have sold  shares of our common  stock in exchange  for cash.  The
amount of borrowed funds and funds from equity sales has been  sufficient to pay
the cost of legal  and  accounting  fees as  necessary  to  maintain  a  current
reporting  status  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange   Commission.   However,
sufficient funds have been unavailable to significantly  pay down commercial and
vendor  accounts  payable.  We have also  been  unable  to pay  salaries  to our
officers  and  several of our outside  consultants  who had  performed  services
during the past and present fiscal years.

     Although our  management is  continuing to provide  services to the Company
for the near term without cash  compensation,  we will still require  additional
funding to maintain the  corporation.  With the acquisition of Planet Halo there
are added  demands for  operating  capital if we are to place the  product  into
service. The Company has been aggressively pursuing financing for the funding of
the Halo device project,  however the financial  advisor retained to assist with
the effort has not produced a satisfactory result. Until such time as definitive
agreements  are  reached  with   investors,   any  form  of  financing   remains
speculative.  If the  financing is not  available,  the Halo may not be put into
production. In the event the financing is not completed, our funds and inventory
assets  will be  exhausted  at  some  point  and  continuing  operations  may be
impossible.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     Our  company  has not  entered  into any  transaction,  agreement  or other
contractual  arrangement  with an entity  unconsolidated  with us under which we
have

     o    an obligation under a guarantee contract,
     o    a  retained  or  contingent  interest  in  assets  transferred  to the
          unconsolidated  entity or similar  arrangement  that serves as credit,
          liquidity or market risk support to such entity for such assets,


                                       10
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

     o    an  obligation,  including a contingent  obligation,  under a contract
          that would be accounted for as a derivative instrument, or
     o    an  obligation,  including a contingent  obligation,  arising out of a
          variable  interest  in an  unconsolidated  entity that is held by, and
          material  to, us where  such  entity  provides  financing,  liquidity,
          market risk or credit risk support to, or engages in leasing, hedging,
          or research and development services with, us.

Contractual obligations

     The following table sets forth, as of the end of the latest fiscal year-end
balance sheet, information with respect to our known contractual obligations.

-------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Payments Due-by Period
-------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
           Contractual                       Less Than                                 More Than
           Obligations             Total      1 Year       1-3 Years     3-5 Years      5 Years
-------------------------------- --------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S>                              <C>       <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Long-Term Debt Obligations         None
-------------------------------- --------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Capital Lease Obligations          None
-------------------------------- --------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Operating Lease Obligations        None
-------------------------------- --------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Other Long-Term Liabilities
Reflected on Our Balance Sheet
under GAAP                         None
-------------------------------- --------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------

-------------------------------- --------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total                              None
-------------------------------- --------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
</TABLE>

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INDEX

         The financial statements of the company appear as follows:

         Independent Auditors' Report ........................................12
         Consolidated Balance Sheet, June 30, 2006 ...........................13
         Consolidated Statements of Operations, Years Ended June 30,
                  2006 and 2005 and the Period from
                  September 20, 1996 (Inception) to June 30, 2006 ............14
         Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit),
                  September 20, 1996 (Inception) to June 30, 2006 ............15
         Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Years Ended June 30,
                  2006 and 2005 and the Period from
                  September 20, 1996 (Inception) to June 30, 2006 ............17
         Notes to Financial Statements .......................................18









                                       11
<PAGE>

             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Concierge Technologies, Inc.

We have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheet  of  Concierge
Technologies,  Inc. and subsidiary (a development  stage company) as of June 30,
2006 and the related  statements of operations,  stockholders'  deficit and cash
flows for each of the two years in the period  ended  June 30,  2006 and for the
period from September 20, 1996  (inception),  to June 30, 2006.  These financial
statements   are  the   responsibility   of  the   Company's   management.   Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion on these financial  statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits of these  statements in accordance with the standards of
the Public Company Accounting  Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable  assurance about
whether the financial  statements  are free of material  misstatement.  An audit
includes  examining,  on a test  basis,  evidence  supporting  the  amounts  and
disclosures in the financial  statements.  An audit also includes  assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated  financial statements referred to above present
fairly,  in  all  material   respects,   the  financial  position  of  Concierge
Technologies,  Inc.,  and  subsidiary as of June 30, 2006 and the results of its
operations  and its cash flows for the period then ended and from  September 20,
1996  (inception),  to June 30, 2006, in conformity with  accounting  principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared using the generally
accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates
the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of
business.  The  Company's has not earned any revenue since its inception and has
accumulated  deficit of  $3,909,313  at June 30,  2006  including  a net loss of
$44,552 during the year ended June 30, 2006.  These factors as discussed in Note
4 to the  financial  statements,  raises  substantial  doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going  concern.  Management's  plans in regard to these
matters are also  described in Note 4. The  financial  statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


/s/ Kabani & Company, Inc.

KABANI & COMPANY, INC.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Los Angeles, California
October 03, 2006


                                       12
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                  June 30, 2006

                                     ASSETS
                                     ------

CURRENT ASSETS:
         Cash & cash equivalents                                    $     3,882
         Due from related party                                             160
                                                                    -----------
                                                                    $     4,042
                                                                    ===========


                      LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
                      -------------------------------------

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
         Accounts payable and accrued expenses                      $   402,977
         Notes payable - related parties                                129,751
                                                                    -----------
                  Total current liabilities                             532,728

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
         Preferred stock, par value $.001 per share; 10,000,000
         shares authorized; none issued                                    --
         Common stock, $.001 par value; 190,000,000 shares
         authorized; issued and outstanding 142,292,747                 142,293
         Additional paid in capital                                   3,238,334
         Deficit accumulated during the development stage            (3,909,313)
                                                                    -----------
                  Total stockholders' deficit                          (528,686)
                                                                    -----------
                                                                    $     4,042
                                                                    ===========











   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       13
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                   FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
       AND THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2006

                                                                                             For the Period
                                                             Years Ended                   From September 20,
                                                               June 30,                     1996 (Inception)
                                                      2006                  2005            to June 30, 2006
                                               ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
<S>                                            <C>                   <C>                   <C>
COSTS AND EXPENSES
     Product Launch Expenses                   $             --      $             --      $        1,077,785
     Impairment of Assets                                    --                 496,843               988,443
     General & Administrative Expenses                     42,980                45,926             1,471,870
                                               ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
               TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES                    42,980               542,769             3,538,098

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
     Other Income                                              28                    85                   113
     Settlement Income                                       --                    --                  52,600
     Litigation Settlement                                   --                    --                (135,000)
                                               ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
               TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)                   28                    85               (82,287)

                                               ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES                              (42,952)             (542,684)           (3,620,385)

     Provision of Income Taxes                              1,600                 1,600                10,400
                                               ------------------    ------------------    ------------------

NET LOSS                                       $          (44,552)   $         (544,284)   $       (3,630,785)
                                               ==================    ==================    ==================

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
          OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED              142,292,747           142,292,747
                                               ==================    ==================

BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE                        (0.00)   $            (0.00)
                                               ==================    ==================
</TABLE>











   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       14
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                  STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
       AND THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2006

                                                                     Common Stock
                                                     --------------------------------------------
                                                                                      Additional
                                                       Number of         Par           paid in       Accumulated     Stockholders'
                                                        shares          value          capital         Deficit         deficit
                                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                                                  <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Common Stock issued for cash
through June 30, 1997                                     176,306    $      1,763    $    106,162    $       --      $    107,925

Common stock issued for services
through June 30, 1997                                     621,545           6,215            --              --             6,215

Net loss through June 30, 1997                               --              --              --           (96,933)        (96,933)

                                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
Balance at June 30, 1997                                  797,851           7,978         106,162         (96,933)         17,207

Common Stock issued for cash
in the year ended June 30, 1998                           137,475           1,375         194,650            --           196,025

Common stock issued for services
in the year ended June 30, 1998                            22,550             226            --              --               226

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 1998                    --              --              --          (283,891)       (283,891)

                                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
Balance at June 30, 1998                                  957,876           9,579         300,812        (380,824)        (70,433)

Common Stock issued for cash
in the year ended June 30, 1999                           208,000            --              --              --              --

Common stock issued for services
in the year ended June 30, 1999                               450            --              --              --              --

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 1999                    --              --              --           (89,919)        (89,919)

                                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
Balance at June 30, 1999                                1,166,326           9,579         300,812        (470,743)       (160,352)

Acquisition and retirement of Common shares              (262,000)         (2,620)           --              --            (2,620)

Common Stock issued for cash
in the year ended June 30, 2000                           117,184            --              --              --              --

Common stock issued for services
in the year ended June 30, 2000                           354,870            --              --              --              --

Post acquisition stock subscription funds
received net of costs & expenses of $79,710                  --              --              --              --              --

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2000                    --              --              --          (986,986)       (986,986)
                                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Balance at June 30, 2000                                1,376,380           6,959         300,812      (1,457,729)     (1,149,958)

Post acquisition stock subscription funds
received                                                     --              --              --              --              --

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2001                    --              --              --          (544,080)       (544,080)
                                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Balance at June 30, 2001                                1,376,380           6,959         300,812      (2,001,809)     (1,694,038)

Recapitalization upon merger                          118,681,333         113,099        (300,812)       (278,527)       (466,240)


   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       15
<PAGE>

Stock subscription received for 500,000 shares               --              --              --              --            29,983

Stock issued for services                               2,532,581         119,031            --              --           119,031

Stock to be issued for services-3,275,472 shares             --              --              --              --           153,947

Adjustment to paid in capital on merger                      --          (116,499)        116,499            --              --

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2002                    --              --              --          (478,229)       (478,229)
                                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Balance at June 30, 2002                              122,590,294         122,590         116,499      (2,758,565)     (2,335,546)

Stock issued for subscription received
in the prior year                                         500,000             500          29,483            --              --

Stock issued for services included in the
prior period                                            3,275,472           3,275         150,672            --              --

Forfeiture of stock subscription                             --              --            10,000            --            10,000

Cancellation of over issued shares on
recapitalization                                          (73,017)           --              --              --              --

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2003                    --              --              --           (47,272)        (47,272)
                                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Balance at June 30, 2003                              126,292,749         126,365         306,654      (2,805,837)     (2,372,818)

Adjustment to par value                                      --               (72)             72            --              --

Issuance of shares for cash                             2,000,000           2,000          18,000            --            20,000

Issuance of shares for cash 3rd qtr                          --              --              --              --

Issuance of shares for services                         4,000,000           4,000         212,000            --           216,000

Issuance of shares for acquisition of Planet Halo       9,999,998          10,000         490,000            --           500,000

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2004                    --              --              --          (514,639)       (514,639)
                                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Balance at June 30, 2004                              142,292,747         142,293       1,026,726      (3,320,476)     (2,151,457)

Reclassify contingent liabilities to Additional
Paid In Capital                                              --              --         1,929,900            --         1,929,900

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2005                    --              --              --          (544,284)       (544,284)
                                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Balance at June 30, 2005                              142,292,747         142,293       2,956,626      (3,864,761)       (765,841)

Loans converted to Paid in Capital                           --              --           281,708            --           281,708

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2006                    --              --              --           (44,552)        (44,552)
                                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Balance at June 30, 2006                              142,292,747    $    142,293    $  3,238,334    $ (3,909,313)   $   (528,686)
                                                     ============    ============    ============    ============    ============
</TABLE>











   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       16
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                       YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
       AND THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2006

                                                                                                               September 20, 1996
                                                                        June 30,              June 30,           (inception) to
                                                                          2006                  2005              June 30, 2006
                                                                   ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
<S>                                                                <C>                   <C>                   <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
       Net loss                                                    $          (44,552)   $         (544,284)   $       (3,630,785)
       Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
       operating activities:
             Impairment of asset                                                 --                 496,843               742,643
             Depreciation and amortization                                       --                     245                13,155
             Stock issued for services                                           --                    --                 496,352
             Decrease in current assets:
                      Prepaid expense                                            --                    --                (245,800)
             Increase in current liabilities:
                      Accrued expenses                                          6,005                15,269               318,444
                                                                   ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
                Net cash used in operating activities                         (38,548)              (31,928)           (2,305,991)
                                                                   ------------------    ------------------    ------------------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
             Cash received on acquisition of subsidiary                          --                    --                   2,912
             Note receivable - related party                                     --                    --                (100,000)
             Acquisition of equipment                                            --                    --                 (12,910)
                                                                   ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
                Net cash used in investing activities                            --                    --                (109,998)
                                                                   ------------------    ------------------    ------------------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
             Due from related party                                             3,531                (3,690)                 (160)
             Proceeds from Issuance of Shares                                    --                    --                 587,007
             Proceeds from stock subscription forfeited                          --                    --                  10,000
             Proceeds from advance subscriptions                                 --                    --               1,772,983
             Costs and expenses of advance subscriptions                         --                    --                 (79,710)
             Proceeds from (payments to) related party loans                   38,251               (67,500)              129,751
             Reclassification from LP to APIC                                    --
                                                                   ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
                Net cash provided (used) by financing activities               41,782               (71,190)            2,419,871
                                                                   ------------------    ------------------    ------------------

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS                              3,234              (103,118)                3,882

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING BALANCE                                        648               103,766                  --

                                                                   ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING BALANCE                            $            3,882    $              648    $            3,882
                                                                   ==================    ==================    ==================
</TABLE>












   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

                                       17
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.       DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Concierge Technologies,  Inc., (the "Company"),  a California  corporation,  was
incorporated  on August 18,  1993 as  Fanfest,  Inc.  In August 1995 the Company
changed its name to Starfest,  Inc. During 1998, the Company was inactive,  just
having minimal  administrative  expenses.  During 1999 the Company  attempted to
pursue  operations  in the  online  adult  entertainment  field.  There  were no
revenues from this endeavor.  On March 20, 2002, the Company changed its name to
Concierge Technologies, Inc.

In March 2000,  the Company  acquired  approximately  96.83  percent  (8,250,000
shares) of the common stock of MAS  Acquisition XX Corp.  (MAS XX) for $314,688.
This amount was expensed in March 2000 as at the time of the acquisition, MAS XX
had no assets or  liabilities  and was inactive.  On March 21, 2002, the Company
consummated a merger with Concierge, Inc. (Note 11).

Concierge,  Inc. ("CI") was a development  stage enterprise  incorporated in the
state of Nevada on September 20, 1996. The CI had undertaken the development and
marketing  of a new  technology,  a  unified  messaging  product  "The  Personal
Communications  Attendant" ("PCA(TM)").  "PCA(TM)" will provide a means by which
the user of Internet  e-mail can have e-mail messages spoken to him/her over any
touch-tone  telephone or wireless phone in the world.  To-date,  the Company has
not earned any revenue.

On April 6, 2004 the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Planet
Halo,  Inc.  (PHI) whereby,  the Company  purchased all of the  outstanding  and
issued shares of PHI in exchange for 10 million  shares of the Company's  common
stock  valued at  $500,000.  On May 5, 2004 the  Company  issued the shares on a
ratio of 8.232  shares  of its  common  stock to each  share of PHI stock to the
former  shareholders  of PHI.  The  existing  PHI shares  were then  retired and
cancelled. The Company is now the sole shareholder of PHI, a Nevada corporation.
On May 5, 2004 the  President  of PHI was  officially  appointed to the Board of
Directors of the Company along with one other PHI named appointee (Note 15).

PHI is a development stage company in the wireless  telecommunications  industry
and plans to design, manufacture, sale and distribution of hardware and services
that include a hand-held  wireless  Internet  appliance/cell  phone known as the
"Halo",  and an  integrated  wireless  gateway  interface to the Internet  named
"Halomail."

The accounting policies of the Company are in accordance with generally accepted
accounting  principles  and conform to the standards  applicable to  development
stage companies.

2.       SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The  accompanying   condensed  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the
accounts  of  Concierge  Technologies,   Inc.  (parent)  and  its  wholly  owned
subsidiary,  Planet Halo, Inc. All significant  inter-company  transactions  and
accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all liquid  investments with a maturity of three months or
less from the date of purchase that are readily convertible into cash to be cash
equivalents.


                                       18
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements is in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect  the  reported  amounts  of assets  and  liabilities  and  disclosure  of
contingent  assets and  liabilities at the date of the financial  statements and
the  reported  amounts of revenues  and expenses  during the  reporting  period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Equipment

Equipment is carried at cost.  Depreciation  of equipment is provided  using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Expenditures
for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

Income taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences
between the financial  statements and tax basis of assets and  liabilities  that
will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted laws
and rates  applicable  to the periods in which the  differences  are expected to
affect taxable income (loss).  Valuation allowance is established when necessary
to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Basic and diluted net loss per share

Net loss per share is calculated  in accordance  with the Statement of financial
accounting  standards No. 128 (SFAS No. 128), "Earnings per share". SFAS No. 128
superseded  Accounting  Principles  Board  Opinion  No.15 (APB 15). Net loss per
share for all periods  presented  has been  restated to reflect the  adoption of
SFAS No. 128. Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number
of  common  shares  outstanding.  Diluted  net  loss  per  share is based on the
assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted
or exercised.  Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under
this method,  options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the  beginning
of the period (or at the time of issuance,  if later),  and as if funds obtained
thereby were used to purchase  common  stock at the average  market price during
the period.

Stock-based compensation

In October  1995,  the FASB  issued SFAS No. 123,  "Accounting  for  Stock-Based
Compensation".  SFAS No. 123 prescribes  accounting and reporting  standards for
all stock-based compensation plans, including employee stock options, restricted
stock, employee stock purchase plans and stock appreciation rights. SFAS No. 123
requires compensation expense to be recorded (i) using the new fair value method
or (ii) using the existing accounting rules prescribed by Accounting  Principles
Board Opinion No. 25,  "Accounting  for stock issued to employees"  (APB 25) and
related  interpretations  with  pro  forma  disclosure  of what net  income  and
earnings  per share would have been had the  Company  adopted the new fair value
method.  The company uses the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB25 and has
opted for the disclosure  provisions of SFAS No.123.  The implementation of this
standard did not have any material impact on the Company's financial statements.


                                       19
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Issuance of shares for service

Valuation of shares for services is based on the estimated  fair market value of
the services performed.

Fair value of financial instruments

Statement of financial accounting standard No. 107, Disclosures about fair value
of financial  instruments,  requires that the Company  disclose  estimated  fair
values of financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported in the statements
of financial position for current assets and current  liabilities  qualifying as
financial instruments are a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal
use

In March 1998,  the  Accounting  Standards  Executive  Committee of the American
Institute of Certified  Public  Accountants  (ASEC of AICPA) issued Statement of
position  (SOP)  No.  98-1,  "Accounting  for the  costs  of  computer  software
developed or obtained for internal  use",  effective for fiscal years  beginning
after  December 15, 1998.  SOP N0. 98-1  requires that certain costs of computer
software  developed or obtained for internal use be  capitalized  and  amortized
over the useful life of the related software.

Web site development costs

In March  2000,  the  Emergency  Issues  Task  Force  (EITF) of FASB  issued its
consensus  under  EITF-00-02.  Per the consensus,  certain costs incurred in the
development of a Web site should be  capitalized.  According to the EITF,  those
costs  incurred  in  developing  a software  program  should be  capitalized  in
accordance  with Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1,  "Accounting for the costs of
Computer  Software  Developed or obtained for internal use".  Capitalization  of
software  development  costs  begins  upon the  establishment  of  technological
feasibility.  The  establishment  of  technological  feasibility and the ongoing
assessment of recoverability of capitalized  software  development costs require
considerable  judgment by management with respect to certain  external  factors,
including,  but not limited to, anticipated future revenues,  estimated economic
life, and changes in software and hardware  technologies.  The Company  expenses
web  site  development  costs,  which  are  allocated  for  preliminary  project
development, web site general and maintenance.

Research and Development

Expenditures  for  software  development  costs and  research  are  expensed  as
incurred.  Such  costs  are  required  to  be  expensed  until  the  point  that
technological   feasibility  is  established.   The  period  between   achieving
technological feasibility and the general availability of such software has been
short.   Consequently,   costs  otherwise   capitalizable   after  technological
feasibility is achieved are generally expensed because they are insignificant.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when earned.  The Company's revenue  recognition  policies
are in compliance with all applicable accounting regulations, including American
Institute of Certified Public  Accountants  (AICPA)  Statement of Position (SOP)
97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2 and Staff
accounting  bulletin  (SAB) 104. With Respect to Certain  Transactions.  Revenue
from license  programs is recorded when the software has been  delivered and the
customer  is  invoiced.  Revenue  from  packaged  product  sales to and  through
distributors  and resellers is recorded when related  products are shipped.  The
Company does not charge  monthly  service  fee,  instead  charges only  one-time


                                       20
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

purchase  price and the option of buying  upgrades  at a fixed fee based on fair
value of the  upgrade.  When  the  revenue  recognition  criteria  required  for
distributor  and reseller  arrangements  are not met,  revenue is  recognized as
payments are received. Costs related to insignificant obligations, which include
telephone support for certain products, are accrued. Provisions are recorded for
returns,  concessions  and bad debts.  Cost of revenue  includes direct costs to
produce and  distribute  product and direct  costs to provide  online  services,
consulting,   product  support,   and  training  and   certification  of  system
integrators.  Research  and  development  costs are  expensed as  incurred.  The
company did not earn any revenue in the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

In determining the allowance to be maintained, management evaluates many factors
including  industry and historical loss  experience.  The allowance for doubtful
accounts is maintained at an amount management deems adequate to cover estimated
losses.  The company did not have accounts  receivable or allowance for doubtful
accounts as of June 30, 2006.

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period  amounts have been  reclassified  to conform to the current
period presentation.

3.       RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS

In  September  2006,  FASB issued SFAS 158  `Employers'  Accounting  for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement  Plans--an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106,  and 132(R)' This  Statement  improves  financial  reporting by
requiring an employer to recognize  the  overfunded or  underfunded  status of a
defined  benefit  postretirement  plan (other than a  multiemployer  plan) as an
asset or  liability  in its  statement  of  financial  position and to recognize
changes in that  funded  status in the year in which the changes  occur  through
comprehensive  income of a business entity or changes in unrestricted net assets
of  a  not-for-profit  organization.  This  Statement  also  improves  financial
reporting by requiring an employer to measure the funded  status of a plan as of
the  date  of  its  year-end  statement  of  financial  position,  with  limited
exceptions.  An employer with publicly  traded equity  securities is required to
initially  recognize the funded status of a defined benefit  postretirement plan
and to provide the required  disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending
after December 15, 2006. An employer without  publicly traded equity  securities
is required to recognize the funded status of a defined  benefit  postretirement
plan and to provide the  required  disclosures  as of the end of the fiscal year
ending after June 15, 2007.  However, an employer without publicly traded equity
securities  is required to disclose the  following  information  in the notes to
financial  statements  for a fiscal year ending after  December  15,  2006,  but
before June 16, 2007,  unless it has applied the recognition  provisions of this
Statement in preparing those financial statements:

     a.   A brief description of the provisions of this Statement

     b.   The date that adoption is required

     c.   The date the employer  plans to adopt the  recognition  provisions  of
          this Statement, if earlier.


                                       21
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of
the employer's fiscal year-end  statement of financial position is effective for
fiscal years  ending  after  December  15,  2008.  The  management  is currently
evaluating the effect of this pronouncement on financial statements.

In  September  2006,  FASB  issued  SFAS 157  `Fair  Value  Measurements'.  This
Statement  defines fair value,  establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted  accounting  principles  (GAAP),  and expands  disclosures
about fair value  measurements.  This Statement  applies under other  accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements,  the Board having
previously  concluded in those accounting  pronouncements that fair value is the
relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any
new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this
Statement  will  change  current  practice.  This  Statement  is  effective  for
financial  statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim  periods  within those fiscal  years.  The  management  is currently
evaluating the effect of this pronouncement on financial statements.

In March 2006 FASB  issued  SFAS 156  'Accounting  for  Servicing  of  Financial
Assets' this Statement  amends FASB Statement No. 140,  Accounting for Transfers
and  Servicing of Financial  Assets and  Extinguishments  of  Liabilities,  with
respect  to the  accounting  for  separately  recognized  servicing  assets  and
servicing liabilities. This Statement:

     1. Requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability
     each time it  undertakes  an  obligation  to service a  financial  asset by
     entering into a servicing contract.

     2.  Requires  all  separately  recognized  servicing  assets and  servicing
     liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable.

     3.  Permits  an entity  to  choose  'Amortization  method'  or 'Fair  value
     measurement  method'  for each  class of  separately  recognized  servicing
     assets and servicing liabilities.

     4.  At  its  initial  adoption,  permits  a  one-time  reclassification  of
     available-for-sale  securities  to  trading  securities  by  entities  with
     recognized servicing rights, without calling into question the treatment of
     other available-for-sale  securities under Statement 115, provided that the
     available-for-sale  securities  are identified in some manner as offsetting
     the  entity's  exposure  to changes in fair  value of  servicing  assets or
     servicing  liabilities  that a servicer elects to  subsequently  measure at
     fair value.

     5.  Requires  separate  presentation  of  servicing  assets  and  servicing
     liabilities  subsequently  measured  at  fair  value  in the  statement  of
     financial position and additional disclosures for all separately recognized
     servicing assets and servicing liabilities.

     This  Statement  is effective as of the  beginning of the  Company's  first
     fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.  Management believes that
     this  statement  will not have a  significant  impact  on the  consolidated
     financial statements.

In February  2006,  FASB issued SFAS No.  155,  "Accounting  for Certain  Hybrid
Financial  Instruments".  SFAS  No.  155  amends  SFAS No 133,  "Accounting  for
Derivative  Instruments and Hedging  Activities",  and SFAF No. 140, "Accounting
for  Transfers  and  Servicing  of  Financial  Assets  and   Extinguishments  of
Liabilities".  SFAS No. 155,  permits  fair value  remeasurement  for any hybrid
financial  instrument that contains an embedded  derivative that otherwise would
require  bifurcation,  clarifies which  interest-only  strips and principal-only
strips are not  subject  to the  requirements  of SFAS No.  133,  establishes  a
requirement  to evaluate  interest in securitized  financial  assets to identify
interests  that  are  freestanding  derivatives  or that  are  hybrid  financial
instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, clarifies
that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded


                                       22
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

derivatives,  and  amends  SFAS No.  140 to  eliminate  the  prohibition  on the
qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument
that pertains to a beneficial  interest other than another derivative  financial
instrument.  This statement is effective for all financial  instruments acquired
or issued  after the  beginning of the  Company's  first fiscal year that begins
after  September  15,  2006.  The Company has not  evaluated  the impact of this
pronouncement its financial statements.

In May  2005,  the FASB  issued  SFAS No.  154,  "Accounting  Changes  and Error
Corrections."  This  statement  applies to all  voluntary  changes in accounting
principle and requires  retrospective  application to prior  periods'  financial
statements   of  changes  in   accounting   principle,   unless  this  would  be
impracticable.  This statement also makes a distinction  between  "retrospective
application"  of an  accounting  principle  and the  "restatement"  of financial
statements to reflect the  correction of an error.  This  statement is effective
for accounting  changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning
after  December  15,  2005.  We are  evaluating  the effect the adoption of this
interpretation  will have on its financial  position,  cash flows and results of
operations.

4.       GOING CONCERN

The  accompanying  financial  statements  have been prepared in conformity  with
generally accepted accounting  principles which contemplate  continuation of the
Company as a going concern. However, the Company did not earn any revenue during
the year ended June 30, 2006. The Company has accumulated  deficit of $3,909,313
including  a net loss of  $44,552  during  the year  ended  June 30,  2006.  The
continuing losses have adversely  affected the liquidity of the Company.  Losses
are expected to continue for the immediate future.  The Company faces continuing
significant  business  risks,  which includes but not limited to, its ability to
maintain vendor and supplier relationships by making timely payments when due.

In view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a
major portion of the recorded  asset amounts shown in the  accompanying  balance
sheet is dependent  upon continued  operations of the Company,  which in turn is
dependent  upon the  Company's  ability  to  raise  additional  capital,  obtain
financing and to succeed in its future operations.  The financial  statements do
not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of
recorded asset amounts or amounts and  classification  of liabilities that might
be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management  has taken the following  steps to revise its operating and financial
requirements,  which it believes are  sufficient to provide the Company with the
ability to continue as a going concern.  Management devoted  considerable effort
from  inception  through the year ended June 30,  2006,  towards  (i)  obtaining
additional equity (ii) management of accrued expenses and accounts payable (iii)
liquidation  of  the  software  "PCA(TM)"  and  (vi)  searching  for a  suitable
strategic partner.

Management  believes  that the above  actions will allow the Company to continue
operations through the next fiscal year.

5.       DUE FROM RELATED PARTY

Concierge Technologies,  Inc. has no bank account in its own name. Wallen Group,
a consulting  company  headed by David W. Neibert (the president and director of
Concierge Technologies, Inc.), maintains an administrative account for Concierge
Technologies,  Inc. at Wells Fargo Bank.  As of June 30, 2006,  $160 is due from
Wallen Group.


                                       23
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6.       NOTES PAYABLE - RELATED PARTIES

Notes payable consisted of the following at June 30, 2006:

Notes payable to shareholder, interest rate of 8%, unsecured
and payable on October 1, 2006 (past due)                             35,000

Notes payable to director/shareholder, non-interest bearing
unsecured and payable on demand                                        3,251

Notes payable to director/shareholder, non-interest bearing
unsecured and payable on demand                                        8,500

Notes payable to shareholder, interest rate of 10%, unsecured,
and payable on July 31, 2004 (past due)                                5,000

Notes payable to shareholder, interest rate of 10%, unsecured
and payable on October 1, 2004 (past due)                             28,000

Notes payable to shareholder, interest rate of 8%, unsecured
and payable on October 1, 2004 (past due)                             14,000

Notes payable to director/shareholder, interest rate of 8%,
unsecured and payable on September 1, 2004 (past due)                  3,500

Notes payable to shareholder, interest rate of 8%, unsecured
and payable on October 1, 2005                                        20,000

Notes payable to director/shareholder, interest rate of 8%,
unsecured and payable on February 1, 2006                              5,000

Notes payable to director/shareholder, interest rate of 8%,
unsecured and payable on June 1, 2006                                  5,000

Notes payable to director/shareholder, interest rate of 8%,
unsecured and payable on February 1, 2006                              2,500
                                                                   ---------

         Total Notes payable                                       $ 129,751
                                                                   =========

The Company has recorded interest expense payable to related parties,  amounting
to $9,652 and $6,549 for the year ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

7.       INCOME TAXES

No provision was made for Federal  income tax since the Company has  significant
net operating loss carryforward. Through June 30, 2006, the Company incurred net
operating  losses for tax purposes of  approximately  $3,630,  785.  Differences
between  financial  statement and tax losses consist  primarily of  amortization
allowance,  was immaterial at June 30, 2006. The net operating loss carryforward
may be used to reduce  taxable  income through the year 2025. Net operating loss
for carry forwards for the State of California is generally  available to reduce
taxable  income  through the year 2010.  The  availability  of the Company's net


                                       24
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

operating loss  carryforward  is subject to limitation if there is a 50% or more
positive  change in the  ownership of the  Company's  stock.  The  provision for
income taxes consists of the state minimum tax imposed on corporations.

The net deferred tax asset balance, due to net operating loss carryforwards,  as
of June  30,  2006 and 2005  were  approximately  $1,  452,  000 and  $1,445,000
respectively.  A 100%  valuation  allowance  has been  established  against  the
deferred  tax  assets,  as the  utilization  of the  loss  carryforwards  cannot
reasonably be assured.

The following is a reconciliation  of the provision for income taxes at the U.S.
federal  income  tax rate to the  income  taxes  reflected  in the  Consolidated
Statements of Operations:

                                                   June 30,     June 30,
                                                     2006         2005

Tax expense (credit) at statutory rate-federal       (34)%        (34)%
State tax expense net of federal tax                  (6)          (6)
Changes in valuation allowance                        40           40
                                                   --------     --------
Tax expense at actual rate                            --           --
                                                   ========     ========

8.       SHARES  OF  CONCIERGE,   INC.   ISSUED  SUBJECT  TO   CONTINGENCY   AND
         SUBSCRIPTIONS RECEIVED FOR COMMON STOCK SUBJECT TO CONTINGENCY

Concierge,  Inc.  (CI) issued  117,184  shares for cash  totaling  $202,061  and
354,870 shares for services of $3,549 during the year ended June 30, 2000. Since
December  1998, CI sold  securities to persons in six states in the U. S. CI did
not file Form D or other  filings  in any of the states or with the SEC for such
shares and did not properly follow the requirements for complying with available
exemptions  in each  state.  Accordingly,  all such  shares  are  subject to the
contingency  that they may have  been  issued  without  the  availability  of an
exemption  from  registration  under  the  Securities  Act of 1933 and under the
securities  laws of each of the six states.  Therefore,  CI has treated all such
shares  issued  since   December   1998,  as  Common  stock  issued  subject  to
contingency.  Total shares issued subject to contingency  through June 30, 2006,
were 680,504 for cash and services amounting to $266,610.

Concierge, Inc. (CI) entered into subscription agreements to issue "post merger"
shares in exchange for cash.  Through December 31, 2000, CI had received advance
subscriptions for a gross amount of $1,255,500 before deducting associated costs
of $79,710, for 5,928,750 post merger shares. In the event the merger between CI
and the Company is not completed  prior to November 31, 2000,  the obligation of
the Company  under this  agreement may be satisfied by the issuance of shares in
the  Company  equivalent  on a  pro-rata  basis to the number of shares in "post
merger" Corporation that were subject to this agreement.

As  mentioned  in Note 11, CI merged  with the  Company on March 20,  2002.  The
Company  filed  a  registration  statement  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  ("the  Commission") on June 8, 2000 related to the proposed  merger,
naming CI as the entity  proposed  to be merged into the  Company.  From July 1,
2000 through  September 15, 2000, CI received  additionally  $487,500 as advance
subscription  for  2,127,500  post merger  shares in an offering  intended to be
exempt from  registration  pursuant  to the  provisions  of Section  4(2) of the
Securities  Act of 1933 and of Regulation D, Rule 506 of the  Commission.  It is
possible,  but not certain, that the filing of the registration statement by the
Company  and the manner in which CI  conducted  the sale of the  2,127,500  post
merger  shares of common  stock  constituted  "general  advertising  or  general
solicitation" by CI. General advertising and general solicitation are activities


                                       25
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

that are prohibited when conducted in connection with an offering intended to be
exempt from registration pursuant to the provisions of Regulation D, Rule 506 of
the  Commission.   CI  does  not  concede  that  there  was  no  exemption  from
registration   available   for   this   offering.   Nevertheless,   should   the
aforementioned  circumstances  have constituted  general  advertising or general
solicitation,  CI would be denied the  availability of Regulation D, Rule 506 as
an exemption from the  registration  requirements  of the Securities Act of 1933
when it sold the  2,127,500  post  merger  shares of common  stock after June 8,
2000.  Should no exemption from registration have been available with respect to
the sale of these shares,  the persons who bought them would be entitled,  under
the  Securities  Act of 1933,  to the  return of their  subscription  amounts if
actions to recover  such monies  should be filed within one year after the sales
in  question.  Accordingly,  the  amounts  received by CI from the sale of these
shares are set apart from  Stockholders'  Equity as  "Subscription  received for
common stock subject to  contingency"  to indicate this  contingency.  The total
contingent liabilities related to such shares amounted to $1,929,900 ($2,009,610
less cost and expenses of $79,710).

On January 1, 2005,  the Company  re-classified  such shares to its equity since
the lapse of time had removed any contingencies  because of applicable  statutes
of limitation.

9.       COMMON STOCK

On May 5, 2004 the Company issued 9,999,998 shares of its common stock valued at
$500,000 in exchange for Planet Halo's 100%  outstanding  and issued shares on a
ratio of, 8.232 shares of the Company to each share of Planet Halo stock.

10.      SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS

The Company  prepares its statements of cash flows using the indirect  method as
defined under the Financial Accounting Standard No. 95.

During  the  twelve  months  ended  June  30,  2006,  the  Company  paid all tax
liabilities  outstanding with the Franchise Tax Board of the State of California
for the  fiscal  years  ended  June 30,  2003,  2004  and  2005,  including  all
calculated penalties and interest,  totaling $3,322.97.  The amount reserved for
income  tax in the  accompanying  financial  statements  as  been  appropriately
adjusted to reflect the current status.  The Company paid $0 for interest during
the twelve month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

11.      COMMITMENT

The Company is  co-located  with the  president of the Company and pays no rent.
Rent expense was $0 for the twelve month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

12.      LITIGATION

On May 6, 2002,  a default  judgment was awarded to  Brookside  Investments  Ltd
against, jointly and severally, Concierge, Inc, Allen E. Kahn, and The Whitehall
Companies in the amount of $135,000 plus legal fees.  The Company did not defend
against the complaint by Brookside, which alleged that Brookside was entitled to
a refund of their investment as a result of a breach of contract.  Brookside had
entered into a subscription  agreement with Concierge,  Inc.,  which called for,
among other  things,  the pending  merger  between  Starfest and Concierge to be
completed within 180 days of the investment. The merger was not completed within
180 days and Brookside sought a refund of their investment,  which Concierge was
unable to provide.  The Company has accrued the  judgment  amount of $135,000 in


                                       26
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

the year 2002 as litigation settlement in the accompanying financial statements.
This amount is included in accrued expenses as of June 30, 2006.

13.      ACQUISITION & IMPAIRMENT OF INTANGIBLE ASSET

On April 6, 2004 the  Company  and  Planet  Halo  entered  into  Stock  Purchase
agreement  whereby,  when  consummated,  the Company  would  purchase all of the
outstanding  and issued shares of Planet Halo in exchange for 10 Million  shares
of the Company's  common stock valued at $500,000.  On April 20, 2004 all of the
conditions of the acquisition were met apart from the issuance of the shares. On
May 5, 2004,  the  Company  issued the shares on a ratio of 8.232  shares of the
Company to each share of Planet Halo stock.  The shares were issued  directly to
the  shareholders  of Planet Halo. The existing  Planet Halo shares were retired
and  cancelled.  The Company is now a sole  shareholder of Planet Halo, a Nevada
corporation.  On May 5,  2004  the  President  of  Planet  Halo  was  officially
appointed to the Board of  Directors of the Company  along with one other Planet
Halo named appointee.

Planet  Halo  is  a  development   stage   company   involved  in  the  wireless
telecommunications   industry   through  the  design,   manufacture,   sale  and
distribution of hardware and services that include a hand-held wireless Internet
appliance/cell  phone known as the "Halo",  and an integrated  wireless  gateway
interface to the Internet named "Halomail."

The  purchase  price was  determined  in  arms-length  negotiations  between the
parties.  The assets acquired in this  acquisition  include  without  limitation
computer hardware and goodwill. A summary of the Planet Halo assets acquired and
consideration for is as follows:

                                                Allocated amount
                                                ----------------

         Cash                                       $   2,912
         Equipment, net                                   245
         Goodwill                                     496,843
                                                     --------
                                                    $ 500,000
                                                    =========

                                               Consideration paid
                                               ------------------

         10,000,000 shares of common stock          $ 500,000
                                                    =========

The Company evaluates  intangible  assets,  goodwill and other long-lived assets
for  impairment,  at least on an annual basis and whenever  events or changes in
circumstances  indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable  from its
estimated  future  cash  flows.   Recoverability  of  intangible  assets,  other
long-lived assets and, goodwill is measured by comparing their net book value to
the related projected  undiscounted cash flows from these assets,  considering a
number  of  factors  including  past  operating   results,   budgets,   economic
projections, market trends and product development cycles. If the net book value
of the  asset  exceeds  the  related  undiscounted  cash  flows,  the  asset  is
considered  impaired,  and a second test is  performed  to measure the amount of
impairment  loss.  Potential  impairment  of  goodwill  is  being  evaluated  in
accordance  with SFAS No. 142. The SFAS No. 142 is  applicable  to the financial
statements of the Company beginning July 1, 2002.

On December 31, 2004, the Company evaluated the valuation of goodwill based upon
the performance and market value of the acquisition.  The Company determined the
goodwill is impaired and recorded the impairment of $496,843 in the accompanying
financial statements.


                                       27
<PAGE>

                   CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A development stage company)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company evaluated value of its prepaid expenses during the year ended June
30, 2004 and based upon uncertainness surrounding the utilization of its
software for the "PCA" development, the Company has recorded an impairment of
the prepaid expense amounting $245,800.

14.      FORMATION OF NEVADA SUBSIDIARY

On April 20, 2005, the Company formed a subsidiary corporation under the laws of
the State of Nevada. The subsidiary corporation,  Concierge  Technologies,  Inc.
(Nevada) was formed for the purpose of re-domesticating the Company stock in the
State of Nevada and dissolving the California Corporation.  The action was taken
pursuant to a vote in favor by a majority of  shareholders  of the  Company.  On
March 2, 2006,  the Company filed articles of merger with the Secretary of State
in Nevada effectuating the merger of Concierge Technologies,  Inc. of California
into the Nevada subsidiary.  In order to consummate the merger, the Secretary of
State in California  requires a Certificate  of Tax Clearance from the Franchise
Tax  Board.  The delay in  acquiring  the tax  clearance  caused  for the Nevada
Corporation  to become  inactive.  On September 22, 2006 the Franchise Tax Board
issued the tax  clearance  certificate.  On  October  6, 2006 the tax  clearance
certificate  from  California,  and the other documents  necessary to reactivate
Concierge Technologies, Inc. in Nevada, were filed in the respective states. The
Secretary of State of California has  acknowledged  receipt of the tax clearance
certificate and the merger  documents and the Articles of Merger were filed with
the State of California on October 5, 2006. Concierge Technologies,  Inc. is now
a Nevada  corporation.  Consent  of  Service  will be to the  Resident  Agent in
Nevada,  Capitol Corporate  Services,  Inc., 202 South Minnesota Street,  Carson
City, NV 89703.

15.      SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 2, 2006,  the Company signed a promissory  note and borrowed  $12,500
from Marc Angell, a director.  The Note is due before or on November 1, 2007 and
bears  an  interest  rate of 6%.  Upon  default,  the  holder  has the  right to
foreclose or otherwise enforce all liens or security  interests securing payment
hereof from the Company.

On August 12, 2006,  the Company  signed a promissory  note and borrowed  $1,000
from David Neibert,  a director.  The Note is due before or on September 1, 2007
and bears an  interest  rate of 6%.  Upon  default,  the holder has the right to
foreclose or otherwise enforce all liens or security  interests securing payment
hereof from the Company.

On July 19,  2006  Chairman  Allen  Kahn  received  a  unanimous  vote  from the
directors  in favor of  issuing  Five  Million  (5,000,000)  shares  of stock to
compensate Ryan Consultants Ltd, a Jersey, UK corporation, who have provided the
services of David Neibert for the previous two years,  incurred  expenses on our
behalf, and performed other supportive roles in our fund raising efforts.  As of
October 6, 2006 the shares of stock have not been issued,  but will be issued as
soon as is  practical to do so. There are no  guarantees  that Mr.  Neibert will
continue to act as our Chief  Operating  Officer beyond the current fiscal year,
or that Ryan  Consultants  will continue to compensate Mr. Neibert if he chooses
to  continue  to  perform  his  fiduciary  duties,  or  that  he  will  continue
indefinitely in his capacity without compensation.









                                       28
<PAGE>

ITEM 8.  CHANGES  IN  AND  DISAGREEMENTS  WITH  ACCOUNTANTS  ON  ACCOUNTING  AND
         FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

     The  principal  independent  accountant  of the company or any  significant
subsidiary  has  not  resigned,  declined  to  stand  for  re-election,  or been
dismissed by the company during the periods for which  financial  statements are
included herein.

ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     Evaluation of disclosure  controls and procedures.  The Company carried out
an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's
management,  including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer,  of the  effectiveness  of the design and  operation  of the  Company's
disclosure  controls and  procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report.  Based  upon that  evaluation,  the Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief
Financial  Officer  concluded  that  the  Company's   disclosure   controls  and
procedures  provide  reasonable  assurances  that the information the Company is
required to disclose  in the  reports it files or submits  under the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,  summarized and reported within the
time  period  required  by the  Commission's  rules  and  forms.  There  were no
significant  changes in the Company's internal control over financial  reporting
during the period covered by this report that have materially  affected,  or are
reasonably  likely to materially  affect our internal  controls  over  financial
reporting.

ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION

     On  October  5,  2006  the  registrant,  Concierge  Technologies,  Inc.,  a
California  corporation,  merged  with a  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  also  named
Concierge  Technologies,  Inc., a Nevada corporation.  The Nevada corporation is
the surviving  corporation in the merger.  The charters of the two  corporations
are  essentially  identical,  and the transaction was effected as no more than a
change of domicile from California to Nevada.  The Articles of  Incorporation of
the Nevada  corporation and the Articles of Merger are filed as Exhibits 3.7 and
3.8 to this Form 10-KSB.

                                    PART III

ITEM 9.  DIRECTORS,   EXECUTIVE   OFFICERS,   PROMOTERS  AND  CONTROL   PERSONS;
         COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

     Set  forth  below  are  the  names,  and  terms  of  office  of each of the
directors,   executive   officers   and   significant   employees  of  Concierge
Technologies  at June 30, 2006 and a description  of the business  experience of
each.


                                       29
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

-------------------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------- ----------
                                                                     Office Held    Term of
          Person                           Offices                      Since        Office
-------------------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------- ----------
<S>                        <C>                                      <C>            <C>
-------------------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------- ----------
David W. Neibert            President and Director                   2002           2007
-------------------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------- ----------
James E. Kirk               Secretary and Director                   1996           2007
-------------------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------- ----------
Samuel Wu                   Director                                 2002           2007
-------------------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------- ----------
Allen E. Kahn               Chairman, CEO, CFO and Director          1996           2007
-------------------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------- ----------
Patrick Flaherty            Director                                 2002           2007
-------------------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------- ----------
Marc Angell                 Director and President of Planet Halo    2004           2007
-------------------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------- ----------
Pat Rodden                  Director                                 2004           2007
-------------------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------- ----------
</TABLE>

Allen E. Kahn: Mr. Kahn entered the computer industry as a Systems Engineer with
IBM and subsequently held a series of technical, sales, marketing and management
positions with other multi-billion dollar corporations before becoming President
and CEO of two companies marketing data communications hardware and software. He
has extensive  experience in voice technology,  optical  character  recognition,
data communications and other technical elements of the PCA, which he conceived.
Mr. Kahn is an honors graduate of the University of Texas at El Paso and pursued
postgraduate  studies in Business  Administration  at UTEP and California  State
University, Long Beach.

David W. Neibert: Mr. Neibert has been the President and a director of Concierge
Technologies  since June 17,  2002.  Mr.  Neibert is also the  president  of The
Wallen Group, a general  partnership  providing  consulting services to wireless
communications  companies and other high technology firms in development stages.
Prior to founding  The Wallen  Group,  Mr.  Neibert  served as the  president of
Roamer  One  and  as  a  director  and  executive  vice  president  of  business
development  of their publicly  traded parent company Intek Global  Corporation.
Intek Global  Corporation  manufactured,  sold and  distributed  radio  products
(under  the  names   "Midland",   "Securicor   Wireless",   "Linear   Modulation
Technologies",  and others) globally to the consumer,  government and commercial
markets and operated a nationwide land mobile radio network in the U.S. known as
Roamer One. Intek Global  Corporation was subsequently  acquired by its majority
shareholder,  Securicor plc of Sutton Surrey,  England.  Mr. Neibert reported to
offices  located in Los Angeles,  CA,  Kansas City,  MO, New York City,  NY, and
Sutton Surrey, England during period from 1992 - 1998 before locating The Wallen
Group in Canoga Park, CA.

Patrick Flaherty:  Mr. Flaherty has been in the technology  related business for
over 30 years.  During the last five years,  he has been  president of Manhattan
Resources,  a consulting  company  specializing  in Network  Communications  and
Storage  Management.  In late 1999 he became Senior Vice President of Concierge,
Inc, and served in this position  until March of 2002.  Since April 2002, he has
resumed  his  consulting  business  and was  elected  to the board of  Concierge
Technologies, Inc in September of 2002.

James E. Kirk, Esq.: Mr. Kirk is Corporate Secretary and General Counsel and has
served as a Director of Concierge,  Inc.  since  inception.  He is a graduate of
Wichita  State  University  and holds LLB and JD degrees  from the law school of
Washburn University. Mr. Kirk is an attorney in private practice in Albuquerque,
New Mexico.


                                       30
<PAGE>

Samuel C.H. Wu: With nearly 20 years of experience in  engineering,  banking and
finance;  Mr. Wu has played a pivotal role in developing  and managing  national
and  international  business  activity  relationships  for  organizations in the
public and private sectors.  He was a senior  marketing/credit  officer with the
Bank of America  -World Banking  Division in Tokyo,  London and Hong Kong before
founding  Woodsford  Shipping  & Trading  Co.,  Ltd.  Under Mr.  Wu's  guidance,
Woodsford has become a preeminent firm in the area's import/export and financial
markets.  He has been  actively  involved in the affairs of Concierge  since its
inception.  Mr. Wu is  fluent  in  English,  Japanese  and a number  of  Chinese
dialects. He is a graduate of the University of California,  Berkeley,  where he
received  his BSEE in  electronics  and  computer  sciences and MBA. He has also
taken  advanced  studies  in  manufacturing,  quality  assurance  and  community
medicine.

Marc  Angell:  Mr.  Angell is the founder and  President  of Planet Halo and has
operated the company since its inception in 2000. Prior to founding Planet Halo,
and from the period 1997 through  1999,  Mr.  Angell was the  founder,  majority
shareholder  and CEO of Angellcom,  a supplier and distributor of one-way paging
devices in the U.S.  During the early 1990s Mr.  Angell was also involved in the
land  mobile  radio  business as a license  holder and  manager of 220MHz  radio
systems.  Mr.  Angell  conceptualized,  designed and  marketed  both the one-way
pagers for  Angellcom and the Halo device for Planet Halo. He was elected to the
board of directors  of Concierge  simultaneous  with the  acquisition  of Planet
Halo.

Pat Rodden:  Mr. Rodden has nearly two decades of unique  experience  developing
products and strategies for leading consumer, sports, recreation and electronics
companies.  Rodden is a founding  partner,  director and head of operations  for
Fiori whose expertise has built the company into a leading  consumer  technology
research and design firm that has  garnered  more than 25  international  awards
over the past three years alone, many on behalf of Fortune 500 companies.  Prior
to founding  Fiori in 1994,  Mr.  Rodden held various  product  development  and
program  director  positions at Virtual Vision,  Precor,  Paccar and Hughes.  He
graduated  from  California  State  University,  Chico  in 1984  with a B.S.  in
Mechanical Engineering.

     There are no family relationships between the directors and officers. There
are no significant employees of Concierge who are not described above.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

     Our directors serve as our audit  committee.  There is no financial  expert
serving on the audit committee. We have no financial expert serving on the audit
committee,  because we have no assets of  substantial  value and have no ongoing
business activities.

Code of Ethics

     We have  adopted  a Code of Ethics  that  applies  to our  chief  executive
officer,  chief  financial  officer,  and - should we acquire  such -  principal
accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions. A copy
of the Code of Ethics was filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB  annual  report
for FY 06-30-2004.


                                       31
<PAGE>

Compliance with Section 16 (a) of the Exchange Act

     Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.  Based solely upon
a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us with respect
to our fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 and any written representations furnished
to us from a person subject to Section 16(a) filing  requirements that no Form 5
is required for such period,  no person who, at any time during the fiscal year,
was a  director,  officer  or  beneficial  owner of more than ten  person of our
common stock failed to file on a timely basis reports  required by Section 16(a)
of the Exchange Act during such fiscal year.

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     The following  information concerns the compensation of our chief executive
officer and our chief  operations  officers for the last three completed  fiscal
years. No other executive  officers or individuals  received total annual salary
and bonus that exceeded $100,000 during the last three completed fiscal years.

                                                                  Shares of
Name of Chief Executive Officer    Year     Cash Salary     Common Stock Awarded

David Neibert                      2006          0                    0
Allen Kahn                         2006          0                    0
David Neibert                      2005          0                  0(1)
Allen Kahn                         2005          0                    0
David Neibert                      2004          0                    0
Allen Kahn                         2004          0                    0

--------------------

(1)  Mr. Neibert  received no shares of stock,  however Ryan Consultants Ltd was
     issued 4,000,000  shares of our stock as payment for the services  provided
     by Mr. Neibert. Mr. Neibert disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares.

     Other  than  as  stated  above,  no cash or  stock  compensation,  deferred
compensation  or long-term  incentive  plan awards were issued or granted to our
management during or with respect to the period ended June 30, 2006. Further, no
member of management has been granted any option or stock  appreciation  rights;
accordingly,  no tables  relating to such items have been  included  within this
Item.

     There are no employment contracts,  compensatory plans or arrangements with
respect to any  director or executive  officer  which would in any way result in
payments to any such person  because of his or her  resignation,  retirement  or
other  termination  of  employment,  any change in  control,  or a change in the
person's responsibilities following a change in control.


                                       32
<PAGE>

Long-Term Compensation

     We have no long-term  compensation plans or employment  agreements with any
of our officers or directors.

ITEM 11. SECURITY  OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN  BENEFICIAL  OWNERS AND  MANAGEMENT  AND
         RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

     The table below sets forth the ownership,  as of September 20, 2006 of each
individual  known to  management  to be the  beneficial  owner of more than five
percent of the company's  common stock,  by all directors,  and named  executive
officers, individually and as a group.

       Name and Address of               Amount         Percent of
        Beneficial Owner                 Owned             Class
    ------------------------             ------         ----------
Allen E. Kahn                        23,778,135            16.7%
7547 W. Manchester Ave., No. 325
Los Angeles, CA 90045

Samuel C.H. Wu                       20,855,437            14.7%
1202 Tower 1, Admiralty Centre
18 Harcourt Road
Hong Kong, China

Polly Force Co., Ltd.                10,805,680 (1)         7.6%
1202 Tower 1, Admiralty Centre
18 Harcourt Road
Hong Kong, China

Marc Angell                           7,174,181            5.04%
1575 Spinnaker Dr
Suite 204A
Ventura, CA 93001

Fiori Product Development               411,612 (2)         (3)
411 SW Second Ave.
Third Floor
Portland, OR 97204

F. Patrick Flaherty                   4,727,485             3.3%
637 29th Street
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266

James E. Kirk                         3,383,291             2.4%
1401 Kirby, N.E.
Albuquerque, NM 87112

David W. Neibert                      1,539,100             (1)
24028 Clarington Drive
West Hills, CA 91304

Officers and Directors
  as a Group (7 persons)             61,869,241            43.5%

(1)  Mr. Samuel C. H. Wu is the  beneficial  owner of these shares and 1,620,852
     shares held by Link Sense through his presence on their  respective  Boards
     of Directors.


                                       33
<PAGE>

(2)  Mr.  Rodden is a beneficial  owner of these shares  through his presence on
     the Board of Directors and his shareholdings in Fiori Product  Development,
     Inc.
(3)  Less than one percent.

     There are no agreements between or among any of the shareholders that would
restrict  the  issuance  of shares in a manner  that  would  cause any change in
control of the company.  There are no voting  trusts,  pooling  arrangements  or
similar agreements in the place between or among any of the shareholders, nor do
the shareholders  anticipate the implementation of such an agreement in the near
future.

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

     There  were  no  transactions  during  the  past  two  years,  or  proposed
transactions,  to which Concierge Technologies was or is to be a party, in which
any  director,  executive  officer,  nominee for  election  as a  director,  any
security holder named in Item 10 above and any immediate family member of any of
the foregoing persons had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest.

ITEM 13. EXHIBITS

     The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 10-KSB:

     Exhibit No.                              Description
     -----------                              -----------

      2              -     Stock  Purchase  Agreement  of March 6, 2000  between
                           Starfest, Inc. and MAS Capital, Inc.*

      3.1            -     Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation
                           of  Starfest,   Inc.  and  its  earlier  articles  of
                           incorporation.*

      3.2            -     Bylaws of Concierge, Inc., which became the Bylaws of
                           Concierge Technologies upon its merger with Starfest,
                           Inc. on March 20, 2002.*

      3.5            -     Articles of Merger of Starfest,  Inc. and  Concierge,
                           Inc.  filed with the  Secretary of State of Nevada on
                           March 1, 2002.**

      3.6            -     Agreement  of  Merger  between  Starfest,   Inc.  and
                           Concierge,  Inc. filed with the Secretary of State of
                           California on March 20, 2002.**

      3.7            -     Articles of Incorporation of Concierge  Technologies,
                           Inc.  filed with the  Secretary of State of Nevada on
                           April 20, 2005.


                                       34
<PAGE>

      3.8            -     Articles of Merger  between  Concierge  Technologies,
                           Inc.,  a  California   corporation,   and   Concierge
                           Technologies,  Inc., a Nevada corporation, filed with
                           the Secretary of State of Nevada on March 2, 2006 and
                           the  Secretary of State of  California  on October 5,
                           2006.

     10.1            -     Agreement  of  Merger  between  Starfest,   Inc.  and
                           Concierge, Inc.*

     14              -     Code  of  Ethics   for  CEO  and   Senior   Financial
                           Officers.***

     31              -     Certification of Chief Executive  Officer pursuant to
                           18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
                           Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     31.1            -     Certification of Chief Financial  Officer pursuant to
                           18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
                           Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     32              -     Certification of Chief Executive  Officer pursuant to
                           18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
                           Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     32.1            -     Certification of Chief Financial  Officer pursuant to
                           18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
                           Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     *Previously filed with Form 8-K12G3 on March 10, 2000;  Commission File No.
     000-29913, incorporated herein.

     **Previously  filed  with Form 8-K on April 2,  2002;  Commission  File No.
     000-29913, incorporated herein.

     ***Previously  filed with Form 10-KSB on October 13, 2004;  Commission File
     No. 000-29913, incorporated herein.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

     Audit Fees. Our principal independent accountant billed us, for each of the
last two  fiscal  years,  the  following  aggregate  fees  for its  professional
services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of
financial  statements  included  in our Form  10-QSB  reports or other  services
normally  provided  in  connection  with  statutory  and  regulatory  filings or
engagements for those two fiscal years:

                  Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2006             $25,000
                  Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2005             $26,500


                                       35
<PAGE>

     Audit-Related  Fees. Our principal  independent  accountant  billed us, for
each of the last two fiscal years,  the following  aggregate  fees for assurance
and  related  services  reasonably  related to the  performance  of the audit or
review of our financial statements and not reported above under "Audit Fees":

                  Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2006             $-0-
                  Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2005             $-0-

     Tax Fees. Our principal  independent  accountant billed us, for each of the
last two fiscal years, the following  aggregate fees for  professional  services
rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning:

                  Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2006             $-0-
                  Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2005             $-0-

     All Other Fees. Our principal independent accountant billed us, for each of
the last two  fiscal  years,  the  following  aggregate  fees for  products  and
services  provided by it,  other than the  services  reported in the above three
categories:

                  Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2006             $-0-
                  Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2005             $-0-

     Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services.  The Audit Committee requires
that it pre-approve all audit, review and attest services and non-audit services
before such services are engaged.















                                       36
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     In accordance  with Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934,  the  registrant  caused  this  report to be  signed on its  behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                             CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                                 /s/ David W. Neibert
Date: October 13, 2006       By
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               David W. Neibert, President

     In  accordance  with the Exchange  Act,  this report has been signed by the
following  persons on behalf of the  registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.

                             /s/ David W. Neibert
Date: October 13, 2006
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             David W. Neibert, President and Director

                             /s/ Allen E. Kahn
Date: October 13, 2006
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Allen E. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer and Director

                             /s/ F.P. Flaherty
Date: October 13, 2006
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             F. Patrick Flaherty, Director

                             /s/ James E. Kirk
Date: October 13, 2006
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             James E. Kirk, Secretary and Director

                             /s/ Samuel C.H. Wu
Date: October 13, 2006
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Samuel C.H. Wu, Director

                             /s/ Marc Angell
Date: October 13, 2006
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Marc Angell, Director

                             /s/ Pat Rodden
Date: October 13, 2006
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Pat Rodden, Director





                                       37
<PAGE>

                          CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          Commission File No. 000-29913


                    Index to Exhibits to Form 10-KSB 06-30-06

The following exhibits are filed, by incorporation by reference, as part of this
Form 10-KSB:

     Exhibit No.                              Description
     -----------                              -----------

      2              -     Stock  Purchase  Agreement  of March 6, 2000  between
                           Starfest, Inc. and MAS Capital, Inc.*

      3.1            -     Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation
                           of  Starfest,   Inc.  and  its  earlier  articles  of
                           incorporation.*

      3.2            -     Bylaws of Concierge, Inc., which became the Bylaws of
                           Concierge Technologies upon its merger with Starfest,
                           Inc. on March 20, 2002.*

      3.5            -     Articles of Merger of Starfest,  Inc. and  Concierge,
                           Inc.  filed with the  Secretary of State of Nevada on
                           March 1, 2002.**

      3.6            -     Agreement  of  Merger  between  Starfest,   Inc.  and
                           Concierge,  Inc. filed with the Secretary of State of
                           California on March 20, 2002.**

      3.7            -     Articles of Incorporation of Concierge  Technologies,
                           Inc.  filed with the  Secretary of State of Nevada on
                           April 20, 2005.

      3.8            -     Articles of Merger  between  Concierge  Technologies,
                           Inc.,  a  California   corporation,   and   Concierge
                           Technologies,  Inc., a Nevada corporation, filed with
                           the Secretary of State of Nevada on March 2, 2006 and
                           the  Secretary of State of  California  on October 5,
                           2006.

     10.1            -     Agreement  of  Merger  between  Starfest,   Inc.  and
                           Concierge, Inc.*

     14              -     Code  of  Ethics   for  CEO  and   Senior   Financial
                           Officers.***

     31              -     Certification of Chief Executive  Officer pursuant to
                           18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
                           Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                                       1
<PAGE>

     31.1            -     Certification of Chief Financial  Officer pursuant to
                           18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
                           Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     32              -     Certification of Chief Executive  Officer pursuant to
                           18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
                           Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     32.1            -     Certification of Chief Financial  Officer pursuant to
                           18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
                           Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     *Previously filed with Form 8-K12G3 on March 10, 2000;  Commission File No.
     000-29913, incorporated herein.

     **Previously  filed  with Form 8-K on April 2,  2002;  Commission  File No.
     000-29913, incorporated herein.

     ***Previously  filed with Form 10-KSB on October 13, 2004;  Commission File
     No. 000-29913, incorporated herein.




















                                       2