alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2018-2140: Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Q6jymkJMqi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-01-2019-2018-2140-arthrex-inc-v-smith-nephew-inc-audio-uploaded\/\">2018-2140: Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-01-2019-2018-2140-arthrex-inc-v-smith-nephew-inc-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=Q6jymkJMqi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2018-2140: Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Q6jymkJMqi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. (mp3) Appeal Number: 2018-2140 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
§ 19.735-104 Delegations. ( a ) The Commission has delegated to the Chairperson responsibility for the detection and prevention of acts, short of criminal violations, which could bring discredit upon the Commission and the Federal service.
( b ) *Approvals under 18 U.S.C. 205(e) .* ( 1 ) Commissioners may approve the representational activities permitted by 18 U.S.C. 205(e) by other employees in their immediate offices. The Designated Agency Ethics Official has delegated authority to grant such approvals for all other employees except Commissioners.
( 2 ) ( i ) Requests for approval of the activities permitted by 18 U.S.C. 205(e) shall be in writing and submitted as follows: ( A ) In the case of employees in the immediate offices of a Commissioner, to the Commissioner;
( B ) In the case of Heads of Offices and Bureaus, to the Chairperson; and
( C ) In the case of all other employees except Commissioners, to the Head of the Office or Bureau to which the employee is assigned.
( ii ) An official (other than the Chairperson or another Commissioner) to whom a request for approval under 18 U.S.C. 205(e) is submitted shall forward it to the Designated Agency Ethics Official with the official's recommendation as to whether the request should be granted.
( 3 ) Copies of all requests for approval under 18 U.S.C. 205(e) and the action taken thereon shall be maintained by the Designated Agency Ethics Official.
( c ) *Waivers under 18 U.S.C. 208 .* ( 1 ) Commissioners may waive the applicability of 18 U.S.C. 208(a), in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 208(b)(1) or 208(b)(3) and section 301(d) of Executive Order 12731, for other employees in their immediate offices. The Designated Agency Ethics Official has delegated authority to make such waiver determinations for all other employees except Commissioners.
( 2 ) ( i ) Requests for waiver of the applicability of 18 U.S.C. 208(a) shall be in writing and submitted as follows: ( A ) In the case of employees in the immediate offices of a Commissioner, to the Commissioner;
( B ) In the case of Heads of Offices and Bureaus, to the Chairperson; and
( C ) In the case of all other employees except Commissioners, to the Head of the Office or Bureau to which the employee is assigned.
( ii ) An official (other than the Chairperson or another Commissioner) to whom a waiver request is submitted shall forward it to the Designated Agency Ethics Official with the official's recommendation as to whether the waiver should be granted.
( 3 ) Copies of all requests for waivers and the action taken thereon shall be maintained by the Designated Agency Ethics Official.
[61 FR 56112, Oct. 31, 1996, as amended at 88 FR 21438, Apr. 10, 2023]
#### § 60-300.67 Notification of agencies.

The Director shall ensure that the heads of all agencies are notified of any debarments taken against any contractor.
§ 20.5 Citizenship. ( a ) This rule implements section 310 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 310, regarding the citizenship of licensees in the commercial mobile radio services. Commercial mobile radio service authorizations may not be granted to or held by: ( 1 ) Any foreign government or any representative thereof;
( 2 ) Any alien or the representative of any alien;
( 3 ) Any corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government;
( 4 ) Any corporation of which more than one-fifth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens or their representatives or by a foreign government or representative thereof or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country; or
( 5 ) Any corporation directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than one-fourth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a foreign government or representative thereof, or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country, if the Commission finds that the public interest will be served by the refusal or revocation of such license.
( b ) The limits listed in paragraph (a) of this section may be exceeded by eligible individuals who held ownership interests on May 24, 1993, pursuant to the waiver provisions established in section 332(c)(6) of the Communications Act. Transfers of ownership to any other person in violation of paragraph (a) of this section are prohibited.
[59 FR 18495, Apr. 19, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 55580, Oct. 28, 1996]
Exhibit
      32(b)








This
      Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
      subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
      not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
      document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated
      in
      such filing.








Certification
      Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of
      Title
      18 of the United States Code








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of the Companies (as defined below) on
      Form
      10-Q (the “Reports”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly Keller
      Koeppel, the chief financial officer of





Appalachian
      Power Company





(the
      “Companies”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i)
      the Reports fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
      Reports fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Companies.








/s/
      Holly Keller Koeppel


Holly
      Keller Koeppel


Chief
      Financial Officer








August
      3,
      2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
      Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
No. 11-5177.

#### Hendricks et ux. *v.*Stepp et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Opinions & Orders - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VkIJCtFCUY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/opinions-orders\/\">Opinions & Orders<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/opinions-orders\/embed\/#?secret=VkIJCtFCUY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Opinions & Orders” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"VkIJCtFCUY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Federal Circuit publishes online all opinions, precedential orders, dispositive orders in writs petitions, Rule 36 judgments, non-ministerial orders relating to rehearing or en banc petitions or actions, dispositive orders constituting either judgment or mandate, and any errata notice or revised version for any of the preceding document types.  These matters are typically docketed between [...]"}
# Úradný vestník C 34A/31.

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 34A |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 6131. januára 2018 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 34A

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 6131. januára 2018

---

| Číslo oznamu | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Korigendá |
| 2018/C 34 A/01 | Korigendum k oznámeniu o verejných výberových konaniach EPSO/AD/354/17 — Právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre lotyšský jazyk (LV) EPSO/AD/355/17 — Právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre maltský jazyk (MT) ( Ú. v. EÚ C 418 A, 7.12.2017 ) | 1 |

Číslo oznamu

Obsah

Strana

Korigendá

2018/C 34 A/01

Korigendum k oznámeniu o verejných výberových konaniach EPSO/AD/354/17 — Právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre lotyšský jazyk (LV) EPSO/AD/355/17 — Právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre maltský jazyk (MT) ( Ú. v. EÚ C 418 A, 7.12.2017 )

( Ú. v. EÚ C 418 A, 7.12.2017 )

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

Korigendá

| 31.1.2018 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CA 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CA 34/1

---

Korigendum k oznámeniu o verejných výberových konaniach

EPSO/AD/354/17 — Právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre lotyšský jazyk (LV)

EPSO/AD/355/17 — Právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre maltský jazyk (MT)

(
  Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 418 A z 7. decembra 2017
  )

(2018/C 034 A/01)

Na strane 1:

namiesto:

„Dátum uzávierky: 16. január 2018 o 12.00 hod. (poludnie) stredoeurópskeho času“

má byť:

má byť:

„Dátum uzávierky: 30. január 2018 o 12.00 hod. (poludnie) stredoeurópskeho času“.

Na strane 5:

Na strane 5:

namiesto:

namiesto:

„KEDY A KDE SA MÔŽEM PRIHLÁSIŤ?

Prihláste sa online na webovom sídle úradu EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu do:

16. januára 2018 do 12.00 hod. (poludnie) stredoeurópskeho času.“

má byť:

má byť:

„KEDY A KDE SA MÔŽEM PRIHLÁSIŤ?

Prihláste sa online na webovom sídle úradu EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu do:

30. januára 2018 do 12.00 hod. (poludnie) stredoeurópskeho času.“

---
No. 11-5423.

#### Cooper *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
404 A.2d 1350

#### Commonwealth v. Ronald S. Smith, Appellant.

*629Argued September 11, 1978.

Ronald S. Smith, in propria personam; Kenneth G. Biehn, District Attorney, and with him P. Schenck, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, SPAETH and LIPEZ, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
IN ITEM 8 ON PAGES 33 AND 34 OF THE COMPANY'S REPORT 
ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          66,297
<SECURITIES>                                     4,501
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,986
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,996
<PP&E>                                         155,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                  96,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,478
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                    (54,474)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,111
<SALES>                                        550,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               550,801
<CGS>                                          327,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  327,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               283,844
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (56,603)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (56,603)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (56,603)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.63)
        

</TABLE>
Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in the action entitled                     *United States*                     v.                     *Ambroid Company, Inc.,*                     Civil Action No. 97-11377-JLT, was lodged on January 13, 2000, with the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The proposed consent decree resolves the claims of the United States against J. Frank Strauss and Robert M. Kuzara in a complaint filed against these parties, and several others, pursuant to Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9607. In the complaint, which was filed on June 17, 1997, the United States sought the recovery of past unreimbursed response costs incurred by the United States in connection with  a drum removal action performed at the Yankee Chemical Superfund Site, located at 600 West Water Street, in Taunton, Massachusetts (the “Site”). The settlement also resolves the claims of the United States against Bank Hapoalim, B.M., a third-party defendant in the action. Pursuant to the proposed settlement, the Settling Defendants will reimburse the EPA Hazardous Substance Superfund in the amount of $50,000. The United States has provided a covenant not to sue under Sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9606 and 9607, as well as pursuant to Section 7003 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6973, with respect to the site.                

                    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the proposed consent decree. Any comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Amoroid Company, Inc.,*                     DOJ Ref. Number 90-11-3-1747. Commenters may request an opportunity for a public meeting in the affected area, in accordance with Section 7003(d) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6973(d).                

The proposed consent decree may be examined at EPA Region 1, located at One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02114 (contact Peter DeCambre, 617-918-1890). A copy of the proposed consent decree may be obtained by mail from the Department of Justice Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, D.C. 20044. In requesting a copy, please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $7.25 (25 cents per page reproduction costs).

Joel M. Gross,

Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 00-1645 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit 32(a)








This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.








Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United States Code








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael G. Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Michael G. Morris


Michael G. Morris


Chief Executive Officer








May 3, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-K/A ), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
 Date: July 24, 2006

/s/ John L. HigginsJohn L. HigginsChief Financial Officer; Executive Vice President,Finance and Corporate Development
§ 22.589 One-way or two-way application requirements. In addition to information required by subparts B and D and § 22.529, applications for authorization to operate a paging transmitter on the channels listed in § 22.531, other than applications for a paging geographic area authorization, must contain the applicable supplementary information described in this section. ( a ) *Interference exhibit.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an exhibit demonstrating compliance with § 22.567 with regard to protected transmitters is required. This exhibit must: ( 1 ) For UHF channels, identify each protected transmitter located within 108 kilometers (67 miles) of the proposed transmitter in directions in which the distance to the interfering contour is 76.4 kilometers (47.5 miles) or less, and within 178 kilometers (111 miles) of the proposed transmitter in directions in which the distance to the interfering contour exceeds 76.4 kilometers (47.5 miles); and identify each protected Basic Exchange Telephone Radio System central office transmitter in the Rural Radiotelephone Service within 231 kilometers (144 miles),
( 2 ) For VHF channels, identify each protected transmitter located within 135 kilometers (84 miles) of the proposed transmitter in directions in which the distance to the interfering contour is 93.3 kilometers (58 miles) or less, and within 178 kilometers (111 miles) of the proposed transmitter in directions in which the distance to the interfering contour exceeds 93.3 kilometers (58 miles).
( 3 ) For each protected transmitter identified, show the results of distance calculations indicating that there would be no overlap of service and interfering contours, or alternatively, indicate that the licensee of or applicant for the protected transmitter and/or the applicant, as required, have agreed in writing to accept any interference resulting from operation of the proposed transmitter.
( b ) *Encompassment exhibit.* An exhibit showing that the area within the interfering contour of the proposed transmitter would be totally encompassed by interfering contours of operating co-channel base transmitters controlled by the applicant is required for applications to operate a transmitter with ERP exceeding the basic power and height-power limits of § 22.565. This encompassment exhibit may substitute for the interference exhibit required in paragraph (a) of this section.
[59 FR 59507, Nov. 17, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 11636, Mar. 12, 1997]