alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 24.321 Designated entities. ( a ) *Eligibility for small business provisions.* ( 1 ) A small business is an entity that, together with its controlling interests and affiliates, has average gross revenues not exceeding $ 40 million for the preceding three years.
( 2 ) A very small business is an entity that, together with its controlling interests and affiliates, has average gross revenues not exceeding $ 15 million for the preceding three years.
( b ) *Bidding credits.* After August 7, 2000, a winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of small businesses may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(iii) of this chapter. A winning bidder that qualifies as a very small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of very small businesses may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(ii) of this chapter.
( c ) *Installment payments.* Small businesses that are winning bidders on any regional license prior to August 7, 2000 will be eligible to pay the full amount of their winning bids in installments over the term of the license pursuant to the terms set forth in § 1.2110(g) of this chapter.
[67 FR 45367, July 9, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 42998, July 21, 2003]
No. 11-9430.

#### Simpson *v.*Interscope Geffen A&M Records.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1931 Non-waiver of rights by payments.

An employee's involuntary payment of all or any portion of a debt being collected under 5 U.S.C. 5514 shall not be construed as a waiver of any rights which the employee may have under 5 U.S.C. 5514 or any other provision of contract or law, unless statutory or contractual provisions provide to the contrary.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
VINCENT J. deSOSTOA, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 15d-14(b)

The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of Seabulk Transport,
Inc., general partner of Seabulk Tankers, Ltd., general partner of Seabulk
Transmarine Partnership, Ltd. (the Partnership), does hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the
Form 10-Q) of the Partnership fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

| |  |                                                                           | 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |  | /s/ Vincent J. deSostoa
Name: Vincent J. deSostoa
Date: December 22, 2003
No. 11-5231.

#### Flemings *v.*Illinois Department of Corrections et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5484.

#### Owen *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
§ 27.70 Information exchange. ( a ) *Prior notification.* Public safety licensees authorized to operate in the 758-775 MHz and 788-805 MHz bands may notify any licensee authorized to operate in the 746-757 or 776-787 MHz bands that they wish to receive prior notification of the activation or modification of the licensee's base or fixed stations in their area. Thereafter, the 746-757 or 776-787 MHz band licensee must provide the following information to the public safety licensee at least 10 business days before a new base or fixed station is activated or an existing base or fixed station is modified: ( 1 ) Location;
( 2 ) Effective radiated power;
( 3 ) Antenna height; and
( 4 ) Channels available for use.
( b ) *Purpose of prior notification.* The prior coordination of base or fixed stations is for informational purposes only. Public safety licensees are not afforded the right to accept or reject the activation of a proposed base or fixed station or to unilaterally require changes in its operating parameters. The principal purposes of notification are to: ( 1 ) Allow a public safety licensee to advise the 746-757 or 776-787 MHz band licensee whether it believes a proposed base or fixed station will generate unacceptable interference;
( 2 ) Permit 746-757 and 776-787 MHz band licensees to make voluntary changes in base or fixed station parameters when a public safety licensee alerts them to possible interference; and,
( 3 ) Rapidly identify the source if interference is encountered when the base or fixed station is activated.
[72 FR 27712, May 16, 2007, as amended at 72 FR 48853, Aug. 24, 2007; 79 FR 599, Jan. 6, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Citizen Advocacy Panel, Brooklyn District

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Brooklyn District Citizen Advocacy 
Panel will be held in Brooklyn, New York.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday July 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Cain at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-
488-3555.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an operational meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, July 20, 2000, 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Internal Revenue 
Service Brooklyn Building located at 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 
11201. For more information or to confirm attendance, notification of 
intent to attend the meeting must be made with Eileen Cain. Mrs. Cain 
can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555. The public is invited 
to make oral comments from 8:30 p.m. to 9 p.m. on Thursday, July 20, 
2000. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would 
like to have the CAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-
912-1227 or 718-488-3555, or write Eileen Cain, CAP Office, PO Box R, 
Brooklyn, NY, 11201.
    The Agenda will include the following: various IRS issues.

    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could 
prevent effective advance notice.


    Dated: June 26, 2000.
M. Cathy VanHorn,
Director, CAP, Communications & Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-16799 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
1401 H Street, NW, Suite 1075, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 326

- 5154 Fax (202) 898

- 4810 August 25, 2014

The Honorable Susan Kurland Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Establishment of Slot Exemption Proceeding at Ronald Reag an Washington National Airport Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 41718(b),

DOT

- OST

- 2000

- 7182

Dear Secretary Kurland:

On August 22, JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) informed the Department that JetBlue was adding new Jacksonville, Florida (“Jacksonvil le”) service from Ronald Reagan National Airport (“DCA”). 1 Yet, instead of withdrawing from the instant Proceeding, JetBlue reaffirmed its claim that it should receive another slot pair for

service to Jacksonville from DCA.

Unfortunately for JetBlue, it cannot escape its own comments previously filed in this

case:

 “ JetBlue’s application will introduce competition on a significant route where American has a monopoly. ” 2

 “ In Department proceedings, the introduction of competition in a monopoly

market has b een a primary justification for the award of slot exemptions. ” 3

 “The American monopoly service inflicts a significant cost on the traveling public in the form of higher fares and reduced service.” 4

As the quotes above demonstrate, JetBlue repeatedly empha sized that the Department should award the slot exemptions to it to provide competition on a monopoly route. With JetBlue’s new service announcement, it is clear that the Jacksonville to DCA route no longer satisfies JetBlue’s own criteria for an award of AIR

- 21 slot exemptions.

1 American Airlines, Inc. ( “ American ” ) moves for leave to file an unauthorized document. JetBlue’s August 22, 2014, submission reopened the record in this matter and American is compelled to narrowly respond to the informat ion JetBlue filed.

2 Application of JetBlue Airways Corporation, March 25, 2014, Docket DOT

- OST

- 2000

- 7182, at p.20.

3 Id

. 4 Id.The Honorable Susan Kurland

August 25 , 2014 Page 2 of 2

Meanwhile, Islip, Long Island MacArthur Airport (“Islip”) lost its daily, nonstop service to DCA on July 2, 2014; and will be without service to the nation’s capital if the Department does not award the AIR

- 21 slot exemptions in this proceeding to American. It ignores both the statutory standard and historical Department practice to suggest that

Jacksonville

– an airport with robust competitive nonstop daily service to DCA

– should be awarded the slot exemptions in this proceedin g over a community that has no nonstop service to DCA.

American encourages the Department to dismiss JetBlue’s application and award the slot exemptions to American.

Sincerely,

Howard Kass

Vice President

– Regulatory Affairs

Abigail Donovan

Direc tor, Congressional and Federal Affairs

c c: Service List
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending December 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Dated: August 31, 2010

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-9298.

#### Lucas *v.*Alabama.

Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Cer-tiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Rules of Practice Amendments - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SdtcVmAy73\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/rules-procedures-forms\/rules-of-practice-amendments\/\">Rules of Practice Amendments<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/rules-procedures-forms\/rules-of-practice-amendments\/embed\/#?secret=SdtcVmAy73\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Rules of Practice Amendments” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"SdtcVmAy73\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Prior Amendments Materials relating to past amendments of the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice are available by year.\u00a0 Prior versions of the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice are available in the Rules of Practice Archive. Federal Circuit Rules of Practice Amendments 2023 Federal Circuit Rules of Practice Amendments 2022 Federal Circuit Rules of Practice Amendments […]"}
#### § 214.3 Assumptions.

When the provisions of this part become operative, Presidential emergency authority, including Executive Order 12656, 12472, 12046 (3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 820), and other emergency plans regarding the allocation and use of national resources will be in effect. During an attack, and in a postattack period, the Director, OSTP, will have authority to make new or revised assignments of radio frequencies in accordance with authority delegated by the President.
§ 301-11.300 When is actual expense reimbursement warranted? When: ( a ) Lodging and/or meals are procured at a prearranged place such as a hotel where a meeting, conference or training session is held;
( b ) Costs have escalated because of special events (e.g., missile launching periods, sporting events, World's Fair, conventions, natural or manmade disasters); lodging and meal expenses within prescribed allowances cannot be obtained nearby; and costs to commute to/from the nearby location consume most or all of the savings achieved from occupying less expensive lodging;
( c ) The TDY location is subject to a Presidentially-Declared Disaster and your agency has issued a blanket actual expense authorization for the location (see § 301-70.201);
( d ) Because of mission requirements; or
( e ) Any other reason approved within your agency.
[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15961, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-03, 76 FR 55275, Sept. 7, 2011]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-713.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR MATERIAL 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

Signed at Moscow and Washington 

August 29 and September 1, 2000 

with 

Annexes and Joint Statement 

 and 

Protocol Amending the Agreement 

Signed at Washington September 15, 2006 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

 

 Nuclear Material 

 Agreement signed at Moscow and Washington 

 August 29 and September 1, 2000; 

 Entered into force July 13, 2011. 

 With annexes and joint statement. 

 And protocol amending the agreement. 

 Signed at Washington September 15, 2006; 

 Entered into force July 13, 2011.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"Patrick Chesnut","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/chesnutp\/","title":"Public Advisory for Federal Circuit\u2019s November Session in Philadelphia - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SOmW30ntNn\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/public-advisory-for-federal-circuits-november-session-in-philadelphia\/\">Public Advisory for Federal Circuit\u2019s November Session in Philadelphia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/public-advisory-for-federal-circuits-november-session-in-philadelphia\/embed\/#?secret=SOmW30ntNn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Public Advisory for Federal Circuit\u2019s November Session in Philadelphia” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"SOmW30ntNn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is sitting in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in addition to its regular session in Washington, D.C., as part of its November 2022 session.  The full schedule is available on the court\u2019s website. Due to space occupancy limitations, attendance for the arguments scheduled at area law schools for November [...]"}
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NEW CENTURY
ENERGIES,   INC.  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS  OF  DECEMBER  31,  1997  AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK 
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>              5,533,376
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>              366,727
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                   824,166
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                 586,012
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         7,310,281
<COMMON>                                 110,749
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>              1,583,446
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                      659,050
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>         2,353,245
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    139,253
<PREFERRED>                              140,002
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                   1,948,136
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                       301,743
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           286,600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>            252,542
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                  2,576
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>               39,819
<LEASES-CURRENT>                           4,927
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>         1,841,438
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>          7,310,281
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>              3,342,525
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                     133,919
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>             2,713,300
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>             2,713,300
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                  629,225
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                       (27,189)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>           602,036
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 206,630
<NET-INCOME>                             150,922
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 264,957
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                165,560
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                   344,439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                               1.44
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-11128.

#### Hall *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.