alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 131 (Friday, July 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 42059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-17122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33843]


Arkansas and Missouri Railroad Company--Lease and Operation 
Exemption--Union Pacific Railroad Company

    Arkansas and Missouri Railroad Company (A&M), a Class III rail 
carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 
to lease and operate 3.2 miles of rail line from Union Pacific Railroad 
Company (UP) at several locations near UP's Van Buren, Arkansas yard, 
in Sebastian County, AR. A&M states that there are no mileposts 
assigned to the area by UP.
    Because A&M's projected annual revenues will exceed $5 million, A&M 
has certified to the Board on June 8, 2000, that the required notice of 
the transaction was posted at the workplace of the employees on the 
affected lines on April 6, 2000. See 49 CFR 1150.42(e). A&M stated in 
its verified notice that the transaction was scheduled to be 
consummated on or about June 14, 2000.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Due to the timing of A&M's certification to the Board, 
consummation under normal circumstances would have to be delayed 
until August 7, 2000 (60 days after A&M's certification to the Board 
that it had complied with the Board's rule at 49 CFR 1150.42(e)). In 
a decision in this proceeding served on June 29, 2000, however, the 
Board granted the request by A&M for waiver of the remainder of the 
60-day period, as measured from the certification date to the Board, 
to allow consummation to occur as early as June 29, 2000, because 
rail employees and their unions had been given more than 60 days' 
actual notice in this case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke does not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33843, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on James E. Howard, 90 Canal Street, Boston, MA 02114.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: June 29, 2000.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-17122 Filed 7-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 46913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator; American Health Information 
Community Biosurveillance Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the eighth meeting of the American 
Health Information Community Biosurveillance Workgroup in accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., 
App.)

DATES: August 24, 2006 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090. [Please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building.]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/bio_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be available via Web cast 
at http://www.eventcenterlive.com/cfmx/ec/login/login1.cfm?BID=67.

    Dated: August 3, 2006.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 06-6918 Filed 8-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
CHARGE QUESTIONS:

AEATF-II Removal Efficiency Study Protocol

1. Is this research likely to generate scientifically reliable data, useful for determining the

removal efficiency of BIT from the hands due to dermal exposure associ ated with the use of

latex paint and non-pa int liquid solutions containing containing BIT?

2. Is the research likely to meet the applicable requirements of 40 CFR part 26, subparts K and

L?
No. 11-5402.

#### Prevet *v.*Barone et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. LOXLY JOHNSON, a/k/a Desmond Williams , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cr
- 00799

- CCB

- 1 ; 1:15

- cv
- 01995

- CCB )

Submitted : January 21, 20 20 Decided: January 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Loxly Johnson , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Loxly Johnson seeks to appeal an order reassigning his case to a different district court judge. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (201 8 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (201 8 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The
order Johnson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts a nd legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Searched for **http://www.archives.gov/social-media/blogs.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.archives.gov/social-media/blogs.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Curtis J. Parker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, Cotelligent, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cotelligent, Inc.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 15, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Curtis J. Parker                                
|                     |  |     |  | Curtis J. Parker                                    
|                     |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 27.1422 Accelerated relocation payment.

(a) Eligible space station operators that meet the applicable early-clearing benchmark(s), as confirmed in their Certification of Accelerated Relocation set-forth in [§ 27.1412(g)](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-27.1412#p-27.1412(g)), will be eligible for their respective accelerated relocation payment.

(b) The Relocation Payment Clearinghouse will distribute the accelerated relocation payments accordingly:

Table 1 to Paragraph (b)—Acclerated Relocation Payment by Operator

| | Payment | Phase I payment | Phase II payment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Intelsat | $4,865,366,000 | $1,197,842,000 | $3,667,524,000 |
| SES | 3,968,133,000 | 976,945,000 | 2,991,188,000 |
| Eutelsat | 506,978,000 | 124,817,000 | 382,161,000 |
| Telesat | 344,400,000 | 84,790,000 | 259,610,000 |
| Star One | 15,124,000 | 3,723,000 | 11,401,000 |
| Totals | 9,700,001,000 | 2,388,117,000 | 7,311,884,000 |

(c) The Relocation Payment Clearinghouse shall promptly notify 3.7 GHz Service licensees following validation of the certification of accelerated relocations as set-forth in [Section 27.1412(g)](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-27.1412#p-27.1412(g)). 3.7 GHz Service licensees shall pay the accelerated relocation payments to the Clearinghouse within 60 days of the notice that eligible space station operators have met their respective accelerated clearing benchmark. The Clearinghouse shall disburse accelerated relocation payments to relevant space station operators within seven days of receiving the payment from overlay licensees.

(d) For eligible space station operators that fail to meet either the Phase I or Phase II benchmarks as of the relevant accelerated relocation deadline, the accelerated relocation payment will be reduced according to the following schedule of declining accelerated relocation payments for the six months following the relevant deadline:

Table 2 to Paragraph (d)

| Date of completion | Incremental reduction (percent) | Accelerated relocation payment (percent) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| By Deadline | | 100 |
| 1-30 Days Late | 5 | 95 |
| 31-60 Days Late | 5 | 90 |
| 61-90 Days Late | 10 | 80 |
| 91-120 Days Late | 10 | 70 |
| 121-150 Days Late | 20 | 50 |
| 151-180 Days Late | 20 | 30 |
| 181+ Days Late | 30 | 0 |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of approved Tribal-State Compact. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish, in the                         **Federal Register**                        , notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved the Tribal-State Compacts between the Augustine Band of Mission Indians and the State of California executed on March 15, 2000.                     

# DATES:

This action is effective July 6, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066. 

Dated: June 26, 2000. 

Kevin Gover, 

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 00-16985 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 856 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 856

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
                allowed for interest on education loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 1999

 Mr. Campbell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
                allowed for interest on education loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION ALLOWED FOR INTEREST ON EDUCATION 
              LOANS.

    (a) In General.--The table contained in paragraph (1) of section 
221(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general rule 
for maximum deduction) is amended to read as follows:

        ``In the case of taxable years
                                                             The dollar
          beginning in:
                                                             amount is:
                  1999...............................           $2,000 
                  2000...............................           $3,000 
                  2001...............................           $4,000 
                  2002 or thereafter.................        $5,000.''.
    (b) Revenue Offset.--
            (1) Modification of rates of corporate tax.--The Secretary 
        of the Treasury shall prescribe rates of tax under section 11 
        of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to tax imposed 
        on corporations) which result in a net increase in revenues for 
        a taxable year equal to the net decrease in revenues for that 
        year as a result of the amendment made by subsection (a).
            (2) Estimates and subsequent adjustments.--The rates of tax 
        prescribed under paragraph (1) shall be determined on the basis 
        of estimates made by the Secretary of the Treasury. Adjustments 
        shall be made in such rates for succeeding taxable years to the 
        extent prior estimates resulted in revenues which were in 
        excess of or less than the revenues required under paragraph 
        (1).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to interest due and paid after  December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2






Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-129750 and 333-120063) and the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-110695, 333-112560 and 333-121975) of Myogen,
Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2005, except as to the impact of the
discontinued operations disclosed in Note 4 for which the date is March 10,
2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appear in this
Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 10, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of Futures
Strategic Trust (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer  
|Kenneth A. Shewer      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|March 30, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greater Atlantic Financial Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David E. Ritter Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

A.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

B.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.




                                    By: /s/ David E. Ritter
                                        -------------------
                                        David E. Ritter
                                        Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

                                        Date: February 13, 2006
# Comments on: 2018-1322: Rosetta-Wireless Corporation v. Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd
```

[House Report 106-102]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
 1st Session            HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                 106-102

=======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
         800, THE EDUCATION FLEXIBILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT OF 1999

                                _______
                                

   April 20, 1999.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 143]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 143, by a record vote of 11 to 0, report the 
same to the House with the recommendation that the resolution 
be adopted.

                  SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the consideration of the 
Conference Report to Accompany H.R. 800, the Education 
Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999. The rule waives points of 
order against the conference report and against its 
consideration. The rule further provides that the conference 
report shall be considered as read.
    The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of 
clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring a three-day layover of a 
conference report) because the conference report was not filed 
until Tuesday, April 20, but will be considered on the floor on 
Wednesday, April 21. Also, the waiver of all points of order 
includes a waiver of clause 9 of rule XXII (prohibiting matters 
not specifically committed to the conference from being 
included in the conference report). The conference committee 
adopted an amendment by Senator Jeffords to exempt rural school 
districts from the Department of Education's consortia program. 
This amendment was not within the scope of the conference, but 
it was adopted by the conference by voice vote.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House Rule XIII the results of 
each record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together 
with the names of those voting for and against, are printed 
below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 16

    Date: April 20, 1999.
    Measure: Conference Report to Accompany H.R. 800, the 
Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999.
    Motion by: Mr. Goss.
    Summary of motion: To report the rule.
    Results: Adopted 11 to 0.
    Vote by Members: Goss--Yea; Linder--Yea; Pryce--Yea; Diaz-
Balart--Yea; Hastings--Yea; Myrick--Yea; Sessions--Yea; 
Reynolds--Yea; Hall--Yea; Slaughter--Yea; Dreier--Yea.

                                

```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

1. The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael A. Baker
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Michael A. Baker                     
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before of after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.