alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 4361

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To amend chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that an employee

of the Federal Government may use sick leave to attend to the medical needs

of a family member, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employees Family

Friendly Leave Act’’.

SEC. 2. USE OF SICK LEAVE FOR PURPOSES RELATING TO A FAMILY

MEMBER.

Section 6307 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by

adding at the end the following:

‘‘(d)(1) For the purpose of this subsection, the term ‘family

member’ shall have such meaning as the Office of Personnel

Management shall by regulation prescribe, except that such term

shall include any individual who meets the definition given that

term, for purposes of the leave transfer program under subchapter

III, under regulations prescribed by the Office (as in effect on

January 1, 1993).

‘‘(2) Subject to paragraph (3) and in addition to any other

allowable purpose, sick leave may be used by an employee—

‘‘(A) to give care or otherwise attend to a family member

having an illness, injury, or other condition which, if an

employee had such condition, would justify the use of sick

leave by such an employee; or

‘‘(B) for purposes relating to the death of a family member,

including to make arrangements for or attend the funeral of

such family member.

‘‘(3)(A) Sick leave may be used by an employee for the purposes

provided under paragraph (2) only to the extent the amount used

for such purposes does not exceed—

‘‘(i) 40 hours in any year, plus

‘‘(ii) up to an additional 64 hours in any year, but only

to the extent the use of such additional hours does not cause

the amount of sick leave to the employee’s credit to fall below

80 hours.

‘‘(B) In the case of a part-time employee or an employee on

an uncommon tour of duty, the Office of Personnel Management

shall establish limitations that are proportional to those prescribed

under subparagraph (A).
H. R. 4361—2

‘‘(4)(A) This subsection shall be effective during the 3-year

period that begins upon the expiration of the 2-month period that

begins on the date of the enactment of this subsection.

‘‘(B) Not later than 6 months before the date on which this

subsection is scheduled to cease to be effective, the Office shall

submit a report to Congress in which it shall evaluate the operation

of this subsection and make recommendations as to whether or

not this subsection should be continued beyond such date.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
3

Attached as Exhibit 1 is IJM’s current Air Operator Certificate (AOC) issued on January 

18, 2011 by Austro Control. The AOC is valid until July 8, 2012, and IJM expects it to be 

renewed in due course. 

2. IJM initially applied for DOT exemption authority pursuant to the US-EC 

Agreement to perform foreign charter air transportation of persons, property and mail (i) 

from any point or points behind any Member State of the European Union via any point or 

points in any Member State and via intermediate points to any point or points in the United 

States and beyond; (ii) between any point or points in the United States and any point or 

points in any member of the European Common Aviation Area; (iii) on other charters 

pursuant to the prior approval requirements set forth in Part 212 of the Department’s 

Economic Regulations; and (iv) on transportation authorized by any additional route rights 

made available to European Community carriers in the future. This approval was issued by 

Notice of Action Taken (“NOAT”) dated May 20, 2010, and expiring May 20, 2012. This 

application requests renewal of this authority for an additional two years or until the 

Department issues a foreign air carrier permit, whichever occurs first. 

 3. IJM is a European Community air carrier, its homeland is Austria. 

 4. IJM’s insurance meets or exceeds the liability limits required by 14 CFR 

Part 205. 

 5. A copy of IJM’s waiver of liability limits under the Warsaw Convention is 

on file in Docket OST-2010-0037.
§ 27.1421 Disputes over costs and cost-sharing. ( a ) Parties disputing a cost estimate, cost invoice, or payment or cost-sharing obligation must file an objection with the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse.
( b ) The Relocation Payment Clearinghouse may mediate any disputes regarding cost estimates or payments that may arise in the course of band reconfiguration; or refer the disputant parties to alternative dispute resolution fora. ( 1 ) Any dispute submitted to the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse, or other mediator, shall be decided within 30 days after the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse has received a submission by one party and a response from the other party.
( 2 ) Thereafter, any party may seek expedited non-binding arbitration, which must be completed within 30 days of the recommended decision or advice of the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse or other mediator.
( 3 ) The parties will share the cost of this arbitration if it is before the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse.
( c ) Should any issues still remain unresolved, they may be referred to the Bureau within ten days of recommended decision or advice of the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse or other mediator and any decision of the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse can be appealed to the Chief of the Bureau. ( 1 ) When referring an unresolved matter, the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse shall forward the entire record on any disputed issues, including such dispositions thereof that the Relocation Payment Clearinghouse has considered.
( 2 ) Upon receipt of such record and advice, the Bureau will decide the disputed issues based on the record submitted. The Bureau is directed to resolve such disputed issues or designate them for an evidentiary hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. If the Bureau decides an issue, any party to the dispute wishing to appeal the decision may do so by filing with the Commission, within ten days of the effective date of the initial decision, a Petition for *de novo* review; whereupon the matter will be set for an evidentiary hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.
( 3 ) Parties seeking *de novo* review of a decision by the Bureau are advised that, in the course of the evidentiary hearing, the Commission may require complete documentation relevant to any disputed matters; and, where necessary, and at the presiding judge's discretion, require expert engineering, economic or other reports or testimony. Parties may therefore wish to consider possibly less burdensome and expensive resolution of their disputes through means of alternative dispute resolution.
§ 52.7 Definitions. As used in this subpart: ( a ) *Area code or numbering plan area* (NPA). The term “area code or numbering plan area” refers to the first three digits (NXX) of a ten-digit telephone number in the form NXX-NXX-XXXX, where N represents any one of the numbers 2 through 9 and X represents any one of the numbers 0 through 9.
( b ) *Area code relief.* The term “area code relief” refers to the process by which central office codes are made available when there are few or no unassigned central office codes remaining in an existing area code and a new area code is introduced. Area code relief includes planning for area code “jeopardy,” which is a situation where central office codes may become exhausted before an area code relief plan can be implemented.
( c ) *Central office (CO) code.* The term “central office code” refers to the second three digits (NXX) of a ten-digit telephone number in the form NXX-NXX-XXXX, where N represents any one of the numbers 2 through 9 and X represents any one of the numbers 0 through 9.
( d ) *Central office (CO) code administrator.* The term “central office code administrator” refers to the entity or entities responsible for managing central office codes in each area code.
( e ) *North American Numbering Plan Administrator* (NANPA). The term “North American Numbering Plan Administrator” refers to the entity or entities responsible for managing the NANP.
( f ) *Billing and Collection Agent.* The term “Billing & Collection Agent” (“B&C Agent”) refers to the entity responsible for the collection of funds to support numbering administration for telecommunications services from the United States telecommunications industry and NANP member countries.
( g ) *Pooling Administrator (PA).* The term “Pooling Administrator” refers to the entity or entities responsible for administering a thousands-block number pool.
( h ) *Contamination.* Contamination occurs when at least one telephone number within a block of telephone numbers is not available for assignment to end users or customers. For purposes of this provision, a telephone number is “not available for assignment” if it is classified as administrative, aging, assigned, intermediate, or reserved as defined in § 52.15(f)(1).
( i ) *Donation.* The term “donation” refers to the process by which carriers are required to contribute telephone numbers to a thousands-block number pool.
( j ) *Inventory.* The term “inventory” refers to all telephone numbers distributed, assigned or allocated: ( 1 ) To a service provider; or
( 2 ) To a pooling administrator for the purpose of establishing or maintaining a thousands-block number pool.
[61 FR 47353, Sept. 6, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 55180, Oct. 23, 1997; 65 FR 37707, June 16, 2000]
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.1

                           NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT, INC.
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, James J. McNamara, Chief Executive Officer of National Auto Credit, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Registrant"), in connection with the Registrant's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), do
hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


/s/ James J. McNamara
--------------------------------------------
Name:  James J. McNamara
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  April 25, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND FROM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,083
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  539,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    370,181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               950,240
<PP&E>                                       3,274,474
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,575,474)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,885,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          778,968
<BONDS>                                        532,364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,609
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,279,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,885,774
<SALES>                                      2,148,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,155,713
<CGS>                                        1,653,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               183,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118,587
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,414
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             79,173
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    79,173
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10(lxxiii)





FIRST AMENDMENT TO RETENTION AGREEMENT


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO RETENTION AGREEMENT (this “First Amendment”) is made by and between Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Mitchell W. Ingram (the “Executive”), as of December 13, 2016.
R E C I T A L S
A.    The Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Retention Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015 (the “Retention Agreement”).
B.    The Company and the Executive have agreed to amend certain provisions of the Retention Agreement.
C.    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1.Defined Terms.  Each capitalized term used herein but not otherwise defined herein has the meaning given such term in the Retention Agreement.  Unless otherwise indicated, all references to Sections in this First Amendment refer to Sections of the Retention Agreement.
Section 2.    Amendment to Retention Agreement.
2.1    Amendment to Section 2(a).
(a)    Clause (3) of Section 2(a) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: “(3) a termination of the Executive’s employment by the Company (including a subsidiary of the Company) other than for Cause entitling the Executive to receive benefits under the Key Employee Change of Control Contract for Executive Vice Presidents by and between the Company and the Executive, dated as of December 13, 2016 (the “COC Agreement), or”.
Section 3.    Miscellaneous.
3.1    Confirmation.  The provisions of the Retention Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect following the effectiveness of this First Amendment.
3.2    Applicable Law.   This First Amendment is entered into under, and shall be governed for all purposes by, the laws of the State of Texas, without reference to principles of conflict of laws.
3.3    Counterparts.  This First Amendment may be executed by one or more of the parties hereto in any number of separate counterparts, and all of such counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.  Delivery of this First Amendment by facsimile or other electronic transmission shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart hereof.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment as of the year and date first above written, to be effective as of such date. 
                            
                    	
		
	ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ R. A. Walker

	Name:
	R. A. Walker

	Title:
	Chairman, President and Chief

	 
	Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	EXECUTIVE

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Mitch W. Ingram

	Mitchell W. Ingram
318P15

#### State v. Edward Williams, III

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Belated Appeal

1. Dismissed

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA

2. Denied

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

3. Dismissed as moot
#### § 32.6311 Station apparatus expense.

This account shall include expenses associated with station apparatus. Expenses associated with company internal use communication equipment shall be recorded in Account 6123, Office Equipment Expense.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.716 Form.

An informal complaint shall be in writing and should contain: (a) The name, address and telephone number of the complaint, (b) the name of the carrier against which the complaint is made, (c) a complete statement of the facts tending to show that such carrier did or omitted to do anything in contravention of the Communications Act, and (d) the specific relief of satisfaction sought.

[51 FR 16039, Apr. 30, 1986]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,275
<INVENTORY>                                     22,281
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,487
<PP&E>                                          40,828
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 321,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,323
<BONDS>                                         14,259
<COMMON>                                           180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     253,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   321,030
<SALES>                                        275,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               275,040
<CGS>                                          205,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,325
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,927
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,655
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,272
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,272
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
        

</TABLE>
§ 301-70.709 What can we do to reduce travel charge card delinquencies? To reduce travel charge card delinquencies by your employees, you should consider implementing one or more of the following suggestions (this list is not comprehensive; you may adopt other appropriate procedures): ( a ) Agency travel program coordinators must be trained and aware of their responsibilities and the delinquency management tools available under your agreement with the travel charge card contractor.
( b ) Ensure that managers and supervisors are provided monthly delinquency and questionable charges report.
( c ) Periodically, but at least once a year, verify that cardholders are still current employees.
( d ) For inactive accounts (cards not used within 6 months, one year, etc., reduce card limit to $1, increase dollar limit when necessary.
( e ) Work with the charge card contractor to block certain high-risk category codes (e.g., department stores, automobile dealerships, specialty stores), etc.
( f ) Review ATM cash withdrawals for reasonableness and association with official travel.
( g ) Implement a salary offset program. (See part 301-76 of this chapter).
( h ) Implement split disbursement in your travel vouchering system, so that an employee may authorize you to make certain payments directly to the charge card contractor on the employee's behalf.
( i ) Refer potential fraud cases to your agency IG for investigation.
( j ) Information on travel cardholder training is available at *https://smartpay.gsa.gov/content/training .*
( k ) Ensure that employees turn in their travel charge card when they retire or leave the agency.
[FTR Amdt. 108, 67 FR 57967, Sept. 13, 2002, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61539, Oct. 31, 2007. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2010-02, 75 FR 24436, May 5, 2010, as amended at 85 FR 39849, July 2, 2020]
#### § 302-4.500 If I am authorized to use more than one POV, what are the allowances?

When you are authorized to use more than one POV, the allowances under §§ 302-4.300 and 302-4.302 apply for each POV.
§ 51.605 Additional obligations of incumbent local exchange carriers. ( a ) An incumbent LEC shall offer to any requesting telecommunications carrier any telecommunications service that the incumbent LEC offers on a retail basis to subscribers that are not telecommunications carriers for resale at wholesale rates that are, at the election of the state commission— ( 1 ) Consistent with the avoided cost methodology described in §§ 51.607 and 51.609; or
( 2 ) Interim wholesale rates, pursuant to § 51.611.
( b ) For purposes of this subpart, exchange access services, as defined in section 3 of the Act, shall not be considered to be telecommunications services that incumbent LECs must make available for resale at wholesale rates to requesting telecommunications carriers.
( c ) For purposes of this subpart, advanced telecommunications services sold to Internet Service Providers as an input component to the Internet Service Providers' retail Internet service offering shall not be considered to be telecommunications services offered on a retail basis that incumbent LECs must make available for resale at wholesale rates to requesting telecommunications carriers.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of this section, advanced telecommunications services that are classified as exchange access services are subject to the obligations of paragraph (a) of this section if such services are sold on a retail basis to residential and business end-users that are not telecommunications carriers.
( e ) Except as provided in § 51.613, an incumbent LEC shall not impose restrictions on the resale by a requesting carrier of telecommunications services offered by the incumbent LEC.
[61 FR 45619, Aug. 29, 1996, as amended at 65 FR 6915, Feb. 11, 2000]