alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
                                                                                          EXHIBIT 11.1

                                         CYLINK CORPORATION
                 STATEMENT REGARDING CALCULATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (1)
                              (in thousands, except per share amounts)
<CAPTION>


                                                                         Years ended December 31,
                                                                   ---------------------------------
                                                                     1996         1995         1994
                                                                     ----         ----         ----

<S>                                                                <C>         <C>          <C>
Net income (loss)                                                  $  1,197    $  (1,079)   $    (700)
                                                                   ========    =========    =========

Weighted average shares outstanding:

    Common stock                                                     24,412       17,862       17,619

    Common stock issuable upon exercise of options                    1,167          254          274

    Common stock issuable upon exercise of options
        granted subsequent to November 30, 1994
        through February 15, 1996  (2)                                  182        1,456        1,456
                                                                 ----------    ---------    ---------

Weighted average common shares and equivalents                       25,761       19,572       19,351
                                                                   --------     --------     --------

Net income (loss) per share                                        $   0.05     $  (0.06)    $  (0.04)
                                                                   ========     ========     ========

<FN>
------------
(1)      This Exhibit should be read in conjunction  with Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated  Financial
         Statements.
(2)      Stock options granted  subsequent to November 30, 1994 through  February 15, 1996 have been
         included in the  calculation of common  equivalent  shares (using the treasury stock method
         and the initial public offering price) as if they were  outstanding for all periods through
         the effective date of the Company's initial public offering.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Depomed, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl A. Pelzel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 6, 2009/s/ CARL A. PELZEL Carl A. Pelzel President and Chief Executive Officer


---
Appendix D7 - Technical Support Document for 2002 MANE - VU SIP Modeling Inventories,

Version 3 (zip file) ZIP file contains 1 file of 188 pages. For copies of files access the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection web site: http://www.state.nj.us/dep/baqp/8hrsip/8hrsip.html#final
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-1848: In Re GAMBLE [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"q9tBb6yNU2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-18-2022-21-1848-in-re-gamble-opinion-21-1848-opinion-1-18-2022_1893761\/\">21-1848: In Re GAMBLE [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-18-2022-21-1848-in-re-gamble-opinion-21-1848-opinion-1-18-2022_1893761\/embed\/#?secret=q9tBb6yNU2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-1848: In Re GAMBLE [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"q9tBb6yNU2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: In Re GAMBLE [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-1848 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Original

No. 79-017

#### The State of New Hampshire *ex rel.*George Sampson v. Superior Court

May 23, 1979

*Carleton*Eldredge, Rockingham County attorney, of Exeter *(Paul R. Pudloski*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Thomas D. Rath,*attorney general *(Peter W. Mosseau,*attorney, orally), for the defendant.

*419Memorandum Opinion

This is a petition for a writ of prohibition to contest the validity of an order of the superior court that a prisoner sentenced to more than one year of confinement serve his sentence at the Rockingham County House of Correction.

One Fidler entered a bargained guilty plea. The agreement with the county attorney recommended that a State prison sentence be served in the Rockingham County House of Correction. Fidler and the trial judge relied on that bargain and agreement by the county attorney. Fidler was sent to the prison for processing. His return to Rockingham County was opposed by the sheriff under RSA 623:4.

The trial court was entitled to assume that the county attorney knew the law and had cleared the matter with the sheriff. The court and Fidler were entitled to rely upon the agreement of the county attorney.

“Prohibition is an extraordinary remedy which, although within the discretion of this court, is used with caution and forebearance and only when the right to relief is clear.” *State v. Superior Court,*116 N.H. 1, 2, 350 A.2d 626, 627 (1976). Under the circumstances of this case we decline to issue the writ.

*Writ of prohibition denied.*
§ 60-40.2 Information available on request. ( a ) Upon the request of any person for identifiable records obtained or generated pursuant to Executive Order 11246 (as amended) such records shall be made available for inspection and copying, notwithstanding the applicability of the exemption from mandatory disclosure set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552 subsection (b), if it is determined that the requested inspection or copying furthers the public interest and does not impede any of the functions of the OFCCP, except in the case of records disclosure of which is prohibited by law.
( b ) Consistent with the above, all contract compliance documents within the custody of the OFCCP shall be disclosed upon request unless specifically prohibited by law or as limited elsewhere herein. The types of documents which if in the custody of the OFCCP must be disclosed include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Affirmative action plans, whether or not reviewed and finally accepted by the OFCCP except as limited in 41 CFR 60-40.3(a)(1).
( 2 ) Imposed plans and hometown plans, pending or approved.
( 3 ) Text of final conciliation agreements.
( 4 ) Validation studies of tests or other preemployment selection methods.
( 5 ) Dates and times of scheduled compliance reviews.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Wagering, Inc. (the "Company") for the
year ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of us certifies as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, to our respective knowledge, that:

(1)   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.

A
signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic
versions of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

May 1, 2009

By:

/s/ VICTOR SALERNOName:

Victor SalernoTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 1, 2009

By:

/s/ MELODY SULLIVANName:

Melody SullivanTitle:

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


---
# Search Census Archive

Home1978

## Indiana

**Census Year:** 1978

**Within:** Volume 1: Geographic Area Series

**

### 						Introduction					

**

### 						Chapter 1: State Data					

**

### 						Chapter 2: County Summary Data					

**

### 						Chapter 3: Individual County Data					

**

### 						Appendixes					

### Other Years

#### 				2012			

#### 				2007			

#### 				2002			

#### 				1997			

#### 				1992			

#### 				1987			

#### 				1982			

#### 				1978			

#### 				1974			

#### 				1969			

#### 				1964			

#### 				1959			

#### 				1954			

#### 				1950			

#### 				1945			

#### 				1940			

#### 				1935			

#### 				1930			

#### 				1925			

#### 				1920			

#### 				1910			

#### 				1900			

#### 				1890			

#### 				1880			

#### 				1870			

- Home
- Login

- Home
- Login

repliche rolex orologigenți falsereplique breitling

**Partners:**

National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)

Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell UniversityUnited States Department of Agriculture

**Developed & supported by:**

**Albert R. Mann Library****Cornell University****Ithaca, NY 14853-4301**Phone: **(607) 255-5406**Email: **usda-help@cornell.edu**
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending June 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Date: September 2, 2010

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

** **

**RULE13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

** **

I,   Michael L. Pungello, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-K of ML JWH Strategic Allocation Fund L.P.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: March 1, 2006

 
| By                                           | /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO |   |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Michael L. Pungello                          |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer      |
| and Treasurer                                |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.3.4
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO
 1993 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
          The Trinity Industries, Inc. 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), is hereby amended by this Amendment No. 4, effective as of December 9, 1999.
          Any term which is not defined below shall have the meaning set forth for such term in the Plan.
          1. Section 11 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:
          Non-transferability of Stock Options. A stock option shall not be transferable otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and a stock option may be exercised, during the lifetime of the Optionee, only by the Optionee; provided, however, a Non-qualified Stock Option may be transferred to one or more members of the immediate family of the Optionee, to a trust for the benefit of one or more members of the immediate family of the Optionee, to a partnership, the sole partners of which are the Optionee and members of the immediate family of the Optionee, or a foundation in which the Optionee controls the management of the assets. Upon any transfer, a stock option will remain subject to all the provisions of this Plan and the option agreement, including the provisions regarding termination of rights with respect to the stock option upon termination of the Optionee’s employment, and the transferee shall have all of the rights of and be subject to all of the obligations and limitations applicable to the Optionee with respect to the stock option, except that the transferee may further transfer the stock option only to a person or entity that the Optionee is permitted to transfer the stock option. Any attempted assignment, transfer, pledge, hypothecation, or other disposition of a stock option contrary to the provisions hereof, or the levy of any execution, attachment, or similar process upon a stock option shall be null and void and without effect.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company as of the day and year first above written.
	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:
	 
	/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Depomed, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tammy L. Cameron, Interim Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date: March 16, 2011/s/ TAMMY L. CAMERON Tammy L. Cameron Vice President, Finance and Principal Accounting Officer


---



QuickLinks
## St at e of Ne w York Supre me Court , Appe llat e D i vi s i on T h i rd J udi cial D e

part me n t Decided and Entered: November 10, 2016 522732

________________________________ In the Matter of ANTHONY ARRIAGA, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT MICHAEL CAPRA, as Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

________________________________ Calendar Date: September 20, 2016 Before: Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

__________ Anthony Arriaga, Ossining, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account.-2- 522732

Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of James v Prack, 137 AD3d 1390, 1391 [2016]). Contrary to his request, petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination (see Matter of West v Annucci, 134 AD3d 1379, 1380 [2015]). Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-1221 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ENVIRONMENT 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the UNITED NATIONS 

ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME 

Signed at Washington December 21, 2004 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 UNITED NATIONS 

 ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME 

 Environment: Cooperation 

Agreement signed at Washington December 21, 2004; 

 Entered into force December 21, 2004.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MDI Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2002 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Todd A.
Spence, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Periodic report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
          or78o(d); and

     2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.



/s/ Todd A. Spence

Todd A. Spence
Chief Executive Officer
MDI Technologies, Inc.
August 13, 2002
No. 11-9350.

#### Milton *v.*Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Summit County. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with Bancshares of Florida, Inc.s (Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (Report), I certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the period ended
June 30, 2005.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 3, 2005



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL L. MCMULLAN                                  
|Michael L. McMullan President and Chief Executive Officer



40