Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 2006 / Notices 43811 

water service contracts for supplemental 

irrigation use of up to 6,018 acre-feet of 

storage space in Lucky Peak Reservoir, 

a Corps of Engineers’ project on the 

Boise River, Idaho. 

Mid-Pacific Region: Bureau of 

Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, 

Sacramento, California 95825–1898, 

telephone 916–978–5250. 

New Contract Actions 

42. Cawelo WD, CVP, California: 

Long-term Warren Act contract for 

conveying nonproject water for a nonCVP contractor. 

43. Elk Creek Community Services 

District, CVP, California: Renewal of 

long-term water service contract for up 

to 100 acre-feet for a period of 25 years. 

Completed Contract Action 

23. Sacramento River Settlement 

Contracts, CVP, California: Five 

contracts remain to be executed out of 

a total of 145 contracts and one contract 

with Colusa Drain Mutual Water 

Company; water quantities for these 

contracts total 2.2M acre-feet. These 

contracts will be renewed for a period 

of 40 years. The contracts reflect 

agreements to settle disputes over water 

rights’ claims on the Sacramento River 

and the Colusa Basin Drain. Contracts 

executed February 22, 2006; March 28, 

2006; April 7, 2006; April 10, 2006; and 

May 8, 2006. 

Lower Colorado Region: Bureau of 

Reclamation, PO Box 61470 (Nevada 

Highway and Park Street), Boulder City, 

Nevada 89006–1470, telephone 702–

293–8081. 

New Contract Action 

41. City of Needles and The 

Metropolitan WD of Southern 

California, Lower Colorado Water 

Supply Project, California: Contract for 

acquisition and delivery of Lower 

Colorado Water Supply Project water. 

Completed Contract Actions 

24. Tohono O’odham Nation, CAP, 

Arizona: Amend CAP water delivery 

contract pursuant to the Arizona Water 

Settlements Act, Pub. L. 108–451, 

enacted December 10, 2004. Contract 

executed May 5, 2006. 

40. The Metropolitan WD of Southern 

California, BCP, California: Contract to 

implement a demonstration program to 

create intentionally created surplus 

through extraordinary conservation in 

2006 and 2007 and store this water in 

Lake Mead. Contract executed May 26, 

2006. 

Upper Colorado Region: Bureau of 

Reclamation, 125 South State Street, 

Room 6107, Salt Lake City, Utah 84138–

1102, telephone 801–524–3864. 

New Contract Action 

33. North Fork Water Conservancy 

District and Ragged Mountain Water 

Users Association, Paonia Project, 

Colorado: North Fork and Ragged 

Mountain have requested a contract for 

supplemental water from the Paonia 

Project. This contract is for municipal 

uses. 

Completed Contract Action 

1.(f) GW Spore Family Minor 

Subdivision, Aspinall Storage Unit, 

CRSP: GW Spore has requested a 40- 

year water service contract for 1 acrefoot of water out of Blue Mesa Reservoir. 

They have submitted their augmentation 

plan to Water District 4, case No. 05 CW 

220. Contract executed March 22, 2006. 

Great Plains Region: Bureau of 

Reclamation, PO Box 36900, Federal 

Building, 316 North 26th Street, 

Billings, Montana 59107–6900, 

telephone 406–247–7752. 

New Contract Actions 

47. City of Grand Junction, City of 

Fruita, and Town of Palisade (Municipal 

Recreation Agreement); Colorado-Big 

Thompson Project; Colorado: 

Negotiation of renewal of Municipal 

Recreation Agreement to provide 

historic users pool surplus water from 

Green Mountain Reservoir for 

nonconsumptive municipal recreation 

uses. 

48. Colorado River Water 

Conservation District, Ruedi Reservoir, 

Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado: 

Consideration of a request for a second 

round water sales or repayment contract 

from the regulatory capacity of Ruedi 

Reservoir for up to 5,000 acre-feet 

annually for M&I uses and also 

providing water to the endangered fish 

and supplementing in-stream flows. 

Modified Contract Actions 

19. Clark Canyon Water Supply 

Company, East Bench Unit, P–SMBP, 

Montana: Negotiating renewal of 

contract No. 14–06–600–3592 which 

was amended to expire December 31, 

2006. Current contract may be amended 

again to extend the term not to exceed 

an additional 1 year pursuant to Section 

208 of the 2005 Consolidated 

Appropriations Act if necessary and 

agreed to by both parties. 

20. East Bench ID, East Bench Unit, 

P–SMBP, Montana: Negotiating renewal 

of contract No. 14–06–600–3593 which 

was amended to expire December 31, 

2006. Current contract may be amended 

again to extend the term not to exceed 

an additional 1 year pursuant to Section 

208 of the 2005 Consolidated 

Appropriations Act if necessary and 

agreed to by both parties. 

Completed Contract Action 

40. Mark H. Allredge, H.S. Properties 

LLC (Individual); Boysen Unit, P–

SMBP; Wyoming: Renewal of long-term 

water service contract for up to 84 acrefeet of supplemental irrigation water to 

serve 84 acres. Contract executed March 

24, 2006. 

Dated: June 30, 2006. 

Roseann Gonzales, 

Director, Office of Program and Policy 

Services. 

[FR Doc. E6–12418 Filed 8–1–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent 

Decree 

In accordance with Department 

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that a proposed consent decree in 

United States v. Michael P. Trinski and 

Arrow Marine, Inc., Case No. 05 C 0197, 

was lodged with the United States 

District Court for the Northern District 

of Illinois on July 19, 2006. This 

proposed Consent Decree concerns a 

complaint filed by the United States 

against the Defendants pursuant to 

Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act 

(‘‘CWA’’), 33 U.S.C. 1311(a) and Section 

10 of the Rivers and Harbors 

Appropriation Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. 

403 (‘‘RHA’’), to obtain injunctive relief 

from and impose civil penalties against 

the Defendants for installing a boat 

ramp and associated structures in the 

Fox River Chain-O-Lakes without a 

permit. 

The proposed Consent Decree 

requires either removal of the ramp and 

associated structures or the purchase 

and abandonment of another ramp on 

Fox Lake or Pistakee Lake. The Consent 

Decree also requires payment of a civil 

penalty, and donation of real property to 

the Fox Waterway Agency. 

The Department of Justice will accept 

written comments relating to this 

proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) 

days from the date of publication of this 

notice. Please address comments to Kurt 

Lindland, Assistant United States 

Attorney’s Office, 5th Floor, 219 S. 

Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604 

and refer to United States v. Michael P. 

Trinski and Arrow Marine, Inc., Case 

No. 05 C 0197, including the USAO # 

2004V00910. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the Clerk’s Office, United 

States District Court for the Northern 

District of Illinois, 219 S. Dearborn 

Street, Chicago, Illinois. In addition, the 

proposed Consent Decree may be 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
43812 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 2006 / Notices 

viewed on the World Wide Web at 

http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. 

Kurt N. Lindland, 

Assistant United States Attorney. 

[FR Doc. 06–6647 Filed 8–1–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Employee 

Possessor Questionnaire [OMB Number 

1140–0072] 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives (ATF) has submitted the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed 

information collection is published to 

obtain comments from the public and 

affected agencies. This proposed 

information collection was previously 

published in the Federal Register 

Volume 71, Number 104, pages 30959–

30960 on May 31, 2006, allowing for a 

60 day comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until September 1, 2006. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to The Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Employee Possessor Questionnaire. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form Number: ATF F 

5400.28. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: Individuals or 

households. Other: Business or other 

for-profit. Abstract: Each employee 

possessor in the explosive business or 

operations required to ship, transport, 

receive, or possess (actual or 

constructive), explosive materials must 

submit this form. The form will be 

submitted to ATF to determine whether 

the person who provided the 

information is qualified to be an 

employee possessor in an explosive 

business. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: There will be an estimated 

10,000 respondents, who will complete 

the form within approximately 20 

minutes. 

(6) An estimate of the total burden (in 

hours) associated with the collection: 

There are an estimated 3,334 total 

burden hours associated with this 

collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Bryant, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Justice Management 

Division, Suite 1600, Patrick Henry 

Building, 601 D Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: July 28, 2006. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. E6–12450 Filed 8–1–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–FY–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Proposed Termination of Judgments 

Notice is hereby given that Defendant 

American Watch Association, Inc. 

(‘‘AWA’’) and Defendant Foote, Cone & 

Belding, Inc. (‘‘Foote’’) have filed a joint 

motion to terminate both the Final 

Judgment entered against the AWA 

(‘‘the AWA Final Judgment’’) and the 

Final Judgment entered against Foote 

(‘‘the Foote Final Judgment’’) on March 

9, 1960 in United States v. The 

Watchmakers of Switzerland 

Information Center, Inc., Trade Reg. 

Rep. (CCH) ¶69,655 (S.D.N.Y. Mar 9, 

1960) (collectively ‘‘the AWA and Foote 

Final Judgments’’) and that the 

Department of Justice (‘‘the 

Department’’), Antitrust Division, in a 

stipulation also filed with the Court, has 

tentatively consented to termination of 

the AWA and Foote Final Judgments, 

but has reserved the right to withdraw 

its consent pending receipt of public 

comments. 

The AWA and Foote Final Judgments, 

similar to the Final Judgment entered in 

United States v. The Watchmakers of 

Switzerland Information Center, Inc., 

Trade Reg. Rep. (CCH) ¶69,655 

(S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 1960) (‘‘the 

Watchmakers Final Judgment’’), arose 

out of a 1950s investigation of the 

anticompetitive practices of the Swiss 

watch industry, including Swiss watch 

manufacturers, Swiss trade associations, 

and their United States importers. The 

United States filed a complaint against 

more than 20 watch companies and 

associations in 1954, including the 

AWA and Foote. United States v. The 

Watchmakers of Switzerland 

Information Center, Inc., Civil Action 

No. 96–170 (S.D.N.Y. Complaint filed 

Oct. 19, 1954). The AWA is an 

association that promotes the growth 

and health of the U.S. watch industry 

and lobbies to influence regulatory 

policy. Its members include U.S. watch 

companies as well as U.S. subsidiaries 

of foreign watch manufacturers. Foote is 

an advertising agency that allegedly 

acted as an agent for some of the 

defendants. 

The United States made serveral 

allegations in its complaint. It charged 

that certain Swiss and U.S. 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES