alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

---

Exhibit 4(b)16

|FROM: | Bank
Hapoalim B.M.
|----- | ------------------

|TO: | Lumenis
Ltd.
|--- | ------------

|DATE: | June
17, 2009
|----- | -------------

---

Dear Sirs,

|1. | We
refer to the Restructuring Agreement dated September 30, 2006, as           amended,
made between Bank Hapoalim B.M. (the Bank) and           Lumenis Ltd.
(theBorrower) (the Restructuring           Agreement).
Terms defined in the Restructuring Agreement shall have           the same meanings when
used in this letter.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | We
hereby confirm that the Borrower has requested the Bank to agree to a waiver           of
compliance with the financial covenants under Section 13.25 of the
          Restructuring Agreement with respect only to the Quarter ended on March 31,
          2009.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | We
hereby grant the waiver requested in Section 2 above.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------

|4. | For
the avoidance of doubt, except for the waiver specifically set forth in           section 2
above, the Bank is not making any other waivers of or amendments           to any other
provisions of the Restructuring Agreement or of any of the           schedules thereto.
Save as expressly waived and agreed to by the Bank in this           letter agreement,
the Restructuring Agreement and the schedules thereto shall           remain unaltered
and in full force and effect.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|5. | This
letter agreement shall constitute a Finance Document.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------

| | Yours faithfully,/s/ Rachel Arbel      /s/ Gil BarzilayBANK HAPOALIM B.M. By: Rachel Arbel      Gil Barzilay | 
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

We hereby confirm and agree to the
above:

|/s/ Aviram Steinhart      /s/ Dov Ofer
LUMENIS LTD. |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"20-1101: TENSTREET, LLC v. DRIVERREACH, LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kpXXDwhazM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-19-2020-20-1101-tenstreet-llc-v-driverreach-llc-opinion-20-1101-opinion-10-19-2020_1671364\/\">20-1101: TENSTREET, LLC v. DRIVERREACH, LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-19-2020-20-1101-tenstreet-llc-v-driverreach-llc-opinion-20-1101-opinion-10-19-2020_1671364\/embed\/#?secret=kpXXDwhazM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“20-1101: TENSTREET, LLC v. DRIVERREACH, LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"kpXXDwhazM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: TENSTREET, LLC v. DRIVERREACH, LLC [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 20-1101 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439

PETER R. MARKSTEINER

CLERK OF COURT

CLERK’S OFFICE

202-275-8000

October 11, 2022

Investiture Ceremony for the Hon. Leonard P. Stark

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is holding a formal investiture 

ceremony for the Honorable Judge Leonard P. Stark on Thursday, October 13, 2022, at 

3:00 p.m. (Eastern). Judge Stark was sworn in as a United States Circuit Judge on 

March 17, 2022, in a small, private ceremony.

Due to space limitations in the courthouse, the investiture is by invitation only. Livestreamed audio of the ceremony will be provided on the court’s YouTube channel.

For additional information, please contact the Clerk’s Office at 202-275-8035. All 

media inquiries should be directed to publicinformation@cafc.uscourts.gov or to 202-

275-8040.

###
§ 24.1 Basis and purpose. This section contains the statutory basis for this part of the rules and provides the purpose for which this part is issued. ( a ) *Basis.* The rules for the personal communications services (PCS) in this part are promulgated under the provisions of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that vests authority in the Federal Communications Commission to regulate radio transmission and to issue licenses for radio stations.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part states the conditions under which portions of the radio spectrum are made available and licensed for PCS.
( c ) *Scope.* The rules in this part apply only to stations authorized under this part. Rules in subparts D and E apply only to stations authorized under those subparts.
[58 FR 59183, Nov. 8, 1993. Redesignated at 59 FR 18499, Apr. 19, 1994, and amended at 59 FR 32854, June 24, 1994]
351P15

#### State v. Paul Gregory Perry

1. Defs Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA14-1328)

1.-

2. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Denied

3. State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Allowed
#### § 304-3.8 Must I adhere to the provisions of the Fly America Act when I receive air transportation to a meeting furnished or paid by a non-Federal source?

No, if the payment or ticket was paid in full directly by the non-Federal source or reimbursed to your agency by the non-Federal source, the provisions of the Fly America Act do not apply. (See §§ 301-10.131 through 301-10.143 of this title for the regulations implementing the Fly America Act.)
Serves: 1.8 million customers across 

136,000 sq. miles in six Western 

states (Oregon, Washington, California, 

Utah, Wyoming and Idaho)

Employees: 6,000

Headquarters: Portland, Oregon

Generation 

capacity: 10,595 megawatts

Transmission: Over 16,300 miles of transmission lines

Over 62,930 miles of distribution lines

PacifiCorp is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire 

Hathaway Energy and regulated by the public services 

commissions in the six states it serves.

Serves: 1.1 million customers 

Employees: 2,700 

Headquarters: Bellevue, Wash

Generation

capacity: 3,000 megawatts

Transmission: 13,000 miles of transmission and 

distribution lines

PSE is a subsidary of Puget Energy and is regulated 

by the Washington Utilities and Transportation 

Commission.

EIM Participants (active & pending)

California Independent System Operator | www.caiso.com | 250 Outcropping Way, Folsom, CA 95630 | 916.351.4400

CommPR/SG/05.2015

Serves: 1.3 million customers (40 million 

tourists annually)

Employees: 3,000

Headquarters: Las Vegas, NV

Generation

capacity: 6,100 megawatts

Transmission: controls over 3,800 miles of 

transmission lines

NV Energy is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire 

Hathaway Energy and regulated by the Public Utilities 

Commission of Nevada.

Serves: 1.2 million customers across 

11 of 15 Arizona counties)

Employees: 6,366

Headquarters: Phoenix, AZ

Generation 

capacity: 6,500 megawatts

Transmission: About 5,900 miles of transmission lines

About 29,000 miles of distribution lines

Arizona Public Service is a wholly-owned subsidiary of 

Pinnacle West Capital Corporation and regulated by 

Arizona Corporation Commission.

Serves: over 30 million consumers in California and small portion of Nevada, plus the 

populations of the voluntary Energy Imbalance Market.

Employees: 580

Headquarters: Folsom, California

Generation capacity: 65,000 megawatts

Transmission: controls over 26,000 miles of high voltage transmission lines

The ISO is a non-profit, public benefit corporation with an independent Board of Governors and regulated by 

the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

— Market Operator

company profiles
EXHIBIT 32(b)

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

# OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Hendrx Corp. (Registrant) for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (Report), I, Cherry Chai, chief financial officer, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
               the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Registrant.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Cherry Chai

Cherry ChaiChief Financial
OfficerNovember 11, 2005

This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for
the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written
statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-2357: MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L. [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LRDzwytzOI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-05-2023-21-2357-medtronic-inc-v-teleflex-innovations-sarl-opinion-21-2357-opinion-6-5-2023_2137084\/\">21-2357: MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L. [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-05-2023-21-2357-medtronic-inc-v-teleflex-innovations-sarl-opinion-21-2357-opinion-6-5-2023_2137084\/embed\/#?secret=LRDzwytzOI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-2357: MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L. [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"LRDzwytzOI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L. [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-2357 Origin: PTO Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 27

                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001082540
<NAME>                        CORBETT LAKE MINERALS INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                          US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                            4,113
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5,613
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5,384
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         12,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       45,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        229
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 21,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 21,618
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,618)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
No. 10-11208.

#### Muhlenbruch *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43811-43812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6647]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Department Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 
given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. Michael P. 
Trinski and Arrow Marine, Inc., Case No. 05 C 0197, was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on 
July 19, 2006. This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed 
by the United States against the Defendants pursuant to Section 301(a) 
of the Clean Water Act (``CWA''), 33 U.S.C. 1311(a) and Section 10 of 
the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. 403 
(``RHA''), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties 
against the Defendants for installing a boat ramp and associated 
structures in the Fox River Chain-O-Lakes without a permit.
    The proposed Consent Decree requires either removal of the ramp and 
associated structures or the purchase and abandonment of another ramp 
on Fox Lake or Pistakee Lake. The Consent Decree also requires payment 
of a civil penalty, and donation of real property to the Fox Waterway 
Agency.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Please address comments to Kurt Lindland, 
Assistant United States Attorney's Office, 5th Floor, 219 S. Dearborn 
Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604 and refer to United States v. Michael 
P. Trinski and Arrow Marine, Inc., Case No. 05 C 0197, including the 
USAO <greek-i> 2004V00910.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 219 
S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois. In addition, the proposed 
Consent Decree may be

[[Page 43812]]

viewed on the World Wide Web at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html.

Kurt N. Lindland,
Assistant United States Attorney.
[FR Doc. 06-6647 Filed 8-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT 

 

Bank of Florida N.A. f/k/a Citizens National Bank of Southwest Florida, Naples, Collier County, Florida. Organized under the laws of the United States. 

 

Bank of Florida Trust Company f/k/a Citizens Capital Management, Inc., Naples, CollierCounty, Florida. Organized under the laws of the State of Florida. 

 

Bank ofFlorida, Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida. Organized under the laws of the State of Florida. 

 

Bank of Florida, Tampa Bay, Hillsborough County, Florida. Organized under the laws of the State of Florida
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 9, 2004 (the Report), I, Robert Essner, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 9, 2004

                              By /s/           Robert Essner
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                               Robert Essner
                              Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 51-11.2 Applicability. This part applies to demands and requests to employees of the Committee in legal proceedings, for factual or expert testimony relating to official information or for production of official records or information. However, it does not apply to: ( a ) Demands for a current Committee employee to testify as to facts or events that are unrelated to his or her official duties or that are unrelated to the functions of the Committee;
( b ) Demands for a former Committee employee to testify as to matters in which the former employee was not directly or materially involved while at the Committee;
( c ) Requests for the release of non-exempt records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 (41 CFR part 51-8), or the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(a) (41 CFR part 51-9); and
( d ) Congressional or Government Accountability Office (GAO) demands and requests for testimony or records.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

[LETTERHEAD OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP]




The Board of Directors
PFF Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 
333-20337) on Form S-8 of PFF Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated April 23,1997, 
except as to Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements, which is as of 
June 4, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of PFF Bancorp, Inc. 
and subsidiary as of March 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the 
years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1997, which report appears in the
March 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of PFF Bancorp, Inc.


                                         /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Orange County, California
June 4, 1997
No. 11-5054.

#### Rollins *v.*Cain, Warden, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.