alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the annual report of Prime Air, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report").  I, Blaine Haug,
Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     the  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  June  16,  2004                         /s/  Blaine  Haug
                                                -----------------
                                                Blaine  Haug
                                                Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                                                Chief  Financial  Officer
                                                (Principal Executive Officer and
                                                Principal  Financial  and
                                                Accounting  Officer)


                                       43
<PAGE>
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



Summary of Compensation Arrangements
With Non-Management Directors


Non-management Directors are paid annual retainers, a portion of which is paid in cash and a portion of which is paid in restricted stock and/or restricted stock units. They are also paid an attendance fee, and reimbursed expenses, for each Board meeting. The annual retainer, the portion of the annual retainer paid in restricted stock and/or restricted stock units, and the attendance fee, are determined by or upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and are set forth in the Company's proxy statement each year.


The Lead Independent Director and the Committee Chairs are paid annual retainers. All Committee members are paid an attendance fee, and reimbursed expenses, for each Committee meeting. The Lead Independent Director and Chair annual retainers, and the Committee attendance fees, are also determined by or upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and are set forth in the Company's proxy statement each year.


Directors may elect to defer all or a part of their cash compensation under the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
 
Directors who assumed office prior to June 4, 2002 were eligible for the Company's Continuing Compensation Plan for Non-Management Directors. Because each eligible Director has served at least ten years, he or she will, after the later of termination of service as a Director or age 72, receive for life an amount equal to the annual $30,000 cash retainer for non-management Directors in effect on June 4, 2002. In the event that service as a covered Director terminates because of death, the benefit will be paid to the surviving spouse for five years. 


As part of the Company's overall charitable contributions practice, the Company may, in the sole and absolute discretion of the Board and its Committees, make a charitable contribution in the names of Emerson and a Director upon his or her retirement from the Board (as determined by the Board and its committees), taking into account such Director's tenure on the Board, his or her accomplishments and service on the Board, and other relevant factors.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra Malcom, Committee Management Specialist, office of Science, NCEH/ATSDR, M/S E-28, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404-498-0622.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public comment period is scheduled for 11:30 a.m.-11:40 a.m.

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for both CDC and NCEH/ATSDR. Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.                

Dated: July 28, 2006.

Alvin Hall,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 06-6665 Filed 8-1-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7704

GUY T. LEGRANDE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CA-96-940)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 6, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy T. LeGrande, Appellant Pro Se. William Norris Farrell, Jr.,

Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny in forma pauperis status, and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. LeGrande v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-96-940 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 1997). We also deny

Appellant's motion for judicial notice, his motion for stay of

execution, and his motion for dismissal of all charges. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[House Report 106-684]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-684

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4690, THE DEPARTMENTS OF 
  COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY AND RELATED AGENCIES 
  APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001

                                _______
                                

   June 21 (legislative day, June 20), 2000.--Referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 529]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 529, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                  summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 4690, 
the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary 
and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001, under an open 
rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided 
equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Appropriations. The rule provides that the bill 
shall be considered for amendment by paragraph. The rule waives 
all points of order against consideration of the bill. The rule 
waives points of order against provisions in the bill for 
failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting 
unauthorized or legislative provisions in a general 
appropriations bill or prohibiting reappropriations in a 
general appropriations bill), except as specified in the rule.
    The rule authorizes the Chairman of the Committee of the 
Whole to accord priority in recognition to Members who have 
preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record. The 
rule permits the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole to 
postpone votes during consideration of the bill, and to reduce 
voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote 
follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides one 
motion to recommit, with or without instructions.
    The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of 
clause 4 of rule XIII (requiring a three-day layover of a 
committee report) which is necessary because the report was 
filed on Monday, June 19th and H.R. 4690 may be considered on 
the floor as early as Wednesday, June 21st. A waiver of clause 
2 of rule XXI is also necessary because the bill contains at 
least 30 legislative provisions and over 60 unauthorized 
programs in the bill, which are detailed in the Appropriations 
Committee's report (H. Rept. 106-680).

                                  

```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Your Employee Rights and How to Report Wrongful Conduct - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IFj07b8xBE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/human-resources\/your-employee-rights-and-how-to-report-wrongful-conduct\/\">Your Employee Rights and How to Report Wrongful Conduct<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/the-court\/human-resources\/your-employee-rights-and-how-to-report-wrongful-conduct\/embed\/#?secret=IFj07b8xBE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Your Employee Rights and How to Report Wrongful Conduct” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"IFj07b8xBE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is committed to maintaining a workplace free of discrimination and harassment, where respect, civility, fairness, tolerance, and dignity are the norm. Employment Dispute Resolution Plan On September 25, 2019, the court approved a new Employment Dispute Resolution (EDR) Plan that provides options for the reporting and […]"}
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF DYNACARE
                                                                FEBRUARY 1, 2001
A. CANADIAN OPERATIONS (1):

Dynacare Gamma Institutional Laboratory Services Limited
Dynacare-Gamma Laboratory Partnership
Dynacare Kasper Medical Laboratories
Dynacare Kasper Medical Laboratories (Northern Alberta) Inc. (2)
Dynacare G.P. Inc.
Dynacare Kasper Medical Sales Inc. (2)
Dynacare Laboratories Limited Partnership
Dynacare Realty Inc.
Dynacare X-ray Services Limited (3)
ExecMed Health Services Inc.
The Dynacare Health Group Inc.
Ultra-Med Development Inc. (3)
GDML Leaseco Inc. (1)
Gamma-Dynacare Leasing Corporation (3)
896988 Ontario Limited
3033331 Nova Scotia Company
B.  US OPERATIONS (1)
Dynacare Laboratories Inc.
Dynacare Laboratory Management Inc.
Dynacare Laboratories Investments Inc.
Dynacare Northwest Inc.
SVL Inc.
Dynacare Mississippi Inc.
Dynacare Southwest Laboratories Inc. (Delaware)
Dynacare Texas LP, Inc.
Dynacare Texas Shareholder, Inc.
Clinical Laboratories Cheyenne
Dynacare Texas Laboratories, Inc.
HHD GenPar, Inc. (4)
HH/DL, L.P.
DL/ELLIS, L.L.C.
United/Dynacare L.L.C.
Dynacare Louisiana Inc.
Dynacare Louisiana, L.L.C.
HT/DL LP
SW/DL LP
DL/UHS Inc. (4)
LabSouth, Inc.
Dynacare Financing G.P.
Dynacare Delaware Financing LLC
UHS/DL, L.P.
Dynacare/WPAHS L.L.C.
Dynacare/Oklahoma Inc.
Dynagene LLC

----------
(1)      Excludes legal entities with inactive business operations
(2)      43.37% Indirect Ownership Interest
(3)      72.99% Indirect Ownership Interest
(4)      50% Ownership Interest


                                      E-2
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA
- 2012
- 0801 Directorate Identifier: 2012
- NM - 1 0 6
- AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  (You might need to submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “ **Ex Parte Contacts** .”) ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE Boeing Fritz Soedel 4/30 /12 No response. Airlines For Am erica Mike Bianchi 5/1 /12 No response.

Other/Additional Information:
**EXHIBIT 31.3**
I, Derek Chang, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CC VHoldings, LLC and CC V Holdings Finance, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ Derek ChangDerek ChangInterim Co-Chief Financial Officer(Co-Principal Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of the petition of PATRICK H. FAY to vacate an assessment, etc.

*Bepcmement*— meaning of— *it does not include flagging.*

The flagging and reflagging of sidewalks, and the setting of curb and gutter stones, is not a repavement within the meaning of chapter 580 of 1872 and chapter 813 of 1874 relative to the vacating of assessments in the city of New York.*

Appeal by the Mayor, etc., of New York from an order1 made at Special Term vacating an assessment.

*J. A.*Beall, for the Mayor, etc., of New York, appellant.

*P. A. Hargous,*for the petitioner respondent.

*

 See *ante,*p. 478, and *post,*p. 558.

Brady, J.:

It seems to be conceded that the proceedings, resulting in the assessment affecting the petitioner’s land, were not published according to law, and the only question for consideration is whether the passage of a resolution or ordinance that the sidewalks be flagged, is a repavement within the provisions of the acts of 1872, chaptei *491580, and 1874, chapter 313. The ordinance or resolution undei which the assessments complained of were imposed, was that the sidewalks be flagged and reflagged when necessary and the curb and gutter stones set and reset when necessary after the street was paved with Belgian pavement, under the direction of the street commissioner. The views expressed upon the subject embraced in this question by Justice Davis *In re Burmeister*(9 Hun., 613), are applicable here. Flagging is not, for the reasons assigned by him, a repavement within the provisions of the act *(supra),*and the criticisms upon the recent case, *In re Phillips*(60 N. Y., 16), are also applicable.

The result of adopting the opinion referred to is, flagging not being a repavement, that the irregularities complained of are not fatal under these acts.

It is not necessary to consider whether a resolution to flag the sidewalk embraces setting curb and gutter stones, having arrived at the conclusion stated, but if it were necessary, it seems to be clearly demonstrable that they are not included. The decision of this appeal is put, however, upon the broader ground first stated.

The order should, therefore, be reversed, but without costs of this appeal.

Davis, P. J., concurred.

Present — Davis, P. J., Bradt and Daniels, JJ.

Order reversed, without cost of the appeal.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41123-41124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Notice of Public Information Collection Submitted to OMB for 
Review

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Extension of a currently approved collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board has submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget for review and approval the following proposal 
for collection of information as required by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title: System Diagram Maps.
    OMB Form Number: 2140-0003.
    No. of Respondents: 38.
    Total Burden Hours: 76.

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection should 
submit comments by July 31, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Case Control, Surface Transportation 
Board, Room 705, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423. When 
submitting comments refer to the OMB number and title of the 
information collection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles L. Renninger, 202 565-1631. 
Requests for copies of the information collection may be obtained by 
contacting Ellen R. Keys (202) 565-1654.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Surface Transportation Board is, by

[[Page 41124]]

statute, responsible for the economic regulation of surface 
transportation carriers operating in interstate and foreign commerce. 
The ICC Termination Act of 1995, Public Law 104-88, 109 Stat. 803 
(1995), which took effect on January 1, 1996 abolished the Interstate 
Commerce Commission and transferred the responsibility for regulating 
rail transportation, including the proposed abandonment and 
discontinuance of rail lines, to the Surface Transportation Board. All 
railroads are required to keep current system diagram maps on file. 
These maps designated all lines in a particular railroad's sytem 
according to various categories. Carriers are obligated to amend these 
maps as the need to change the caregories of particular lines arose. If 
no amendment had taken place within a one-yer period, a verified 
statement to that effect must be filed with the Board. The Board will 
use this information to facilitate informed decision making. 
Respondents will be railroads initiating abandonment exemption 
proceedings.

    Dated June 22, 2000.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16705 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P