alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Atlas Minerals Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  March  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, H.R.
(Roy) Shipes,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:       /s/ H.R. (Roy) Shipes
          ------------------------
          H.R. (Roy) Shipes
          Chief Executive Officer
          May 7, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Atlas Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Atlas Minerals Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAVID T. DONES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 79 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
No. 11-5154.

#### Olivares-Gonzalez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. EFR AIN AR M ENTA-AGUILAR , a .k.a . Efra in Sa nc he z -Arm e nta , Jose Sanc he z Arm e nta , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. Nos. 14-50218

14-50219 D.C . Nos. 3:14-c r-00012-DM S

3:09-c r-02325-DM S M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia D ana M . Sa

braw, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, B EA, a nd M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s. Efra in Arm e nt a -Aguila

r a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nts a nd c ha lle nge s the 27-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for atte m pte d re e ntry

of a re m ove d a lie n, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326, a n d the 12- 

# FIL ED JUL 27 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).m onth-a

nd-one -day

c onse c utive se nte nc e im

pose d upon re voc at ion of supe rvise d re le a se . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . Arm e nta -Aguila

r c o nte nds thedistric t c ourt proc e dura lly e rre d in im

posing his ille ga l re e ntry

se nte nc e by

fa iling to (i) justify

the 12-m onth upwa

rd va ria nc e , and (ii) e xpla in its re

j e c tion of his m

itiga t ing a rgum e nts. W e re vie w for pla in e rror, se eUnite d State

s v . Vale nc ia-Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd find none . C ontra

ry to Arm e nta -Aguila

r’ s c onte ntions, the

distric t a de quate ly

e xpla ine d the se nte nc e and its re je c tion of his m

itiga ting a rgum e nts. Se eUnite d State

s v . C arty , 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th C i r. 2008) (e n ba nc ). Arm e nta -Aguila

r ne xt c onte n ds tha

t the a lle ge d proc e dura l e rrors re n de re d his a tte m pte d re e ntry

se nte n c e substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble , a nd tha t his a ggre gate se nte nc e of 39 m onths a

nd one da y is gre ate r tha

n ne c e ssa ry to m e e t the goa ls of se nte nc ing. Thedistric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re t ion in im

posing Arm e nta Aguila r’ s se nte nc e s. Se eGall v . Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The se nte nc e s a

re substa ntive ly re a sona ble in light of the tota l ity

of the c irc um sta

nc e s and a pplic a ble 18 U.S.C . § 3553(a) se nte nc ing fa c t ors, inc luding Arm e nta Aguila r’ s e xte nsive im

m igration history , fa ilure to be de te rre d , a nd bre a c h of the c ourt’ s trust. Se e Gall , 552 U.S. a t 51; Unite d State

s v . Simtob , 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th C ir. 2007). AFFIRM E D. 14 - 5 02 1 8 & 1 4 - 5 0 2 1 9 2
<PAGE>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-37923 and 333-11264) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan
and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90757) pertaining to the
Sinclair Option Agreements of Caribiner International, Inc. of our report dated
December 28, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Caribiner International, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended September 30, 1999.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                                           Ernst & Young LLP

New York, NY
December 28, 1999
```

[Federal Register: May 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 95)]
[Notices]               
[Page 27736]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18my10-36]                         

[[Page 27736]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

 
Cancellation of Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement for Northwest Aggregates' Previously Authorized 
Replacement of an Existing Barge Loading Facility in East Passage of 
Puget Sound on the Southeast Shoreline of Maury Island, King County, WA

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Cancelation of Notice of Intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Seattle District will 
issue a revised Notice of Intent at a later date. The notice that was 
previously published in the Federal Register (75 FR 25217) on May 7, 
2010 is cancelled.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-11816 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Highly Sensitive Documents - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5XNQTtERZp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/case-filings\/highly-sensitive-documents\/\">Highly Sensitive Documents<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/case-information\/case-filings\/highly-sensitive-documents\/embed\/#?secret=5XNQTtERZp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Highly Sensitive Documents” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"5XNQTtERZp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Pursuant to Administrative Order 2021-04 (Jan. 13, 2021), parties may file a Motion for Highly Sensitive Document Protection in order to grant documents a level of security greater than that provided through filing as confidential or under seal in the court’s electronic filing system. The confidential or sealed version of the motion must be filed […]"}
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41063-41064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16699]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-298-002]


Kern River Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Pro Forma 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

June 27, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 19, 2000, Kern River Gas Transmission 
Company (Kern River) has withdrawn certain dated tariff sheets 
initially filed in this proceeding and has replaced them with the 
following corresponding pro forma tariff sheets for inclusion in its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1.

Pro Forma Sheet No. 15
Pro Forma Sheet No. 71
Pro Forma Sheet No. 171
Pro Forma Sheet No. 186
Pro Forma Sheet No. 423-426
Pro Forma Sheet No. 501
Pro Forma Sheet No. 601
Pro Forma Sheet No. 701
Pro Forma Sheet No. 901

    Kern River states that the purpose of this filing is to withdraw 
the dated and numbered tariff sheets filed in this docket on May 24, 
2000, and to replace them with corresponding pro forma sheets.
    Kern River states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
each person designated on the official service list compiled by the 
Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulation. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests

[[Page 41064]]

will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspect in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16699 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 25.289 Protection of GSO networks by NGSO systems.

Unless otherwise provided in this chapter, an NGSO system licensee must not cause unacceptable interference to, or claim protection from, a GSO FSS or GSO BSS network. An NGSO FSS licensee operating in compliance with the applicable equivalent power flux-density limits in Article 22, Section II of the ITU Radio Regulations (incorporated by reference, § 25.108) will be considered as having fulfilled this obligation with respect to any GSO network.

[82 FR 59986, Dec. 18, 2017]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3266] 

Caddo Parish and the contiguous Parishes of Bossier, De Soto, and Red River in the State of Louisiana; Cass, Harrison, Marion, and Panola Counties in the State of Texas; and Miller and Lafayette Counties in the State of Arkansas constitute a disaster area as a result of damages caused by severe storms and tornadoes that occurred on April 23, 2000. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on August 25, 2000, and for economic injury until the close of business on March 26, 2001, at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon Carter Blvd., Suite 102, Ft. Worth, TX 76155. 

The interest rates are: 

### For Physical Damage 

Homeowners with credit available elsewhere—7.375% 

Homeowners without credit available elsewhere—3.687% 

Businesses with credit available elsewhere—8.000% 

Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere—4.000% 

Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere—6.750% 

### For Economic Injury 

Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere—4.000% 

The numbers assigned to this disaster for physical damage are 326612 for Louisiana, 326712 for Texas, and 326812 for Arkansas. For economic injury the numbers are 9H5600 for Louisiana, 9H5700 for Texas, and 9H5800 for Arkansas. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: June 26, 2000. 

Aida Alvarez, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 00-16982 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the audited
consolidated  financial  statements  at August 31, 1999 and for the twelve month
period ended  August 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001003934
<NAME>                       Unidigital Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Aug-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Sep-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         734,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,532,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (744,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               25,966,000
<PP&E>                                         25,876,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,956,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,636,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,457,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       59,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,729,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,636,000
<SALES>                                        62,774,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               62,830,000
<CGS>                                          30,003,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  30,003,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21,312,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               321,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,384,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,810,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,349,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,461,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (11,592,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,828,000)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,959,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (2.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.10)


</TABLE>
#### Maria De Jesus Garcia ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-71290.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 2004.*

Decided March 24, 2004.

Susan E. Hill, Law Offices of Susan E. Hill, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

*991Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lagu-na Niguel, CA, Los Angeles District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Patricia L. Buchanan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before B. FLETCHER, LEAVY, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria de Jesus Garcia Alvarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for cancellation of removal. We review claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings de novo, *Lopez-Urenda v. Ashcroft,*345 F.3d 788, 791 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Garcia Alvarez’s constitutional challenge to the BIA’s streamlining regulation, which we have jurisdiction to review pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 851 (9th Cir.2003).

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s unchallenged discretionary determination that Petitioner failed to meet the hardship requirement for cancellation of removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); *Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003). Thus, we need not consider the IJ’s finding that Petitioner’s witnesses were not credible in establishing the ten-year physical presence requirement.

We also lack jurisdiction to review whether the BIA improperly streamlined this appeal. *See Falcon Carriche,*350 at 854.

The Clerk is directed to stay the mandate pending the resolution of *Desta v. Ashcroft,*No. 03-70477 and further order of this Court.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Softwall Equipment
Corporation, on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Randall Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 8, 2003                  /S/ Randall Peterson
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Randall Peterson,
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   and Principle Accounting Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****United States--Gulf coast,Texas, Matagorda Bay, including Lavaca and Tres Palacios bays [electronicresource]**
 
SuDoc NumberC55.418/7:11317/:

Item Number:0191-B-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000881169
 
1974-1977 | 1978-1982
 
May 4, 2020
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 2.906 Supplier's Declaration of Conformity. ( a ) Supplier's Declaration of Conformity (SDoC) is a procedure where the responsible party, as defined in § 2.909, makes measurements or completes other procedures found acceptable to the Commission to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards and other applicable requirements. Submittal to the Commission of a sample unit or representative data demonstrating compliance is not required unless specifically requested pursuant to § 2.945.
( b ) Supplier's Declaration of Conformity is applicable to all items subsequently marketed by the manufacturer, importer, or the responsible party that are identical, as defined in § 2.908, to the sample tested and found acceptable by the manufacturer.
( c ) The responsible party may, if it desires, apply for Certification of a device subject to the Supplier's Declaration of Conformity. In such cases, all rules governing certification will apply to that device.
( d ) Notwithstanding other parts of this section, equipment otherwise subject to the Supplier's Declaration of Conformity process that is produced by any entity identified on the Covered List, established pursuant to § 1.50002 of this chapter, as producing covered communications equipment is prohibited from obtaining equipment authorization through that process. The rules governing certification apply to authorization of such equipment.
[82 FR 50825, Nov. 2, 2017, as amended at 88 FR 7623, Feb. 6, 2023]