alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: UAS.Registry@faa.gov

To: Scott Wright

Subject: FAA UAS Certificate

Date: Monday, February 1, 2016 10:53:46 AM

Federal Aviation

Administration

Small UAS Certificate of Registration

CERTIFICATE HOLDER: Scott Wright

UAS CERTIFICATE NUMBER: FA3KPNY3NC

ISSUED: 02/01/2016 EXPIRES: 02/01/2019

For U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and certain non-citizen U.S.

 corporations, this document constitutes a Certificate of Registration. For all

 others, this document represents a recognition of ownership.

For all holders, for all operations other than as a model aircraft under sec.

 336 of Pub. L. 112-95, additional safety authority from FAA and economic

 authority from DOT may be required.

Safety guidelines for flying your unmanned aircraft:

Fly below 400 feet

Never fly near other aircraft

Keep your UAS within visual line

 of sight

Keep away from emergency

 responders

Never fly over stadiums, sports

 events or groups of people

Never fly under the influence of

 drugs or alcohol

Never fly within 5 miles of an airport

 without first contacting air traffic

 control and airport authorities

Remember these simple safety

 guidelines when

flying your unmanned aircraft:

Don't be careless or reckless with your UAS

Fly below 400 feet and remain clear of obstacles

Stay away from other aircraft at all times

Keep your UAS within your sight

Don't fly near airports, stadiums, or other people

Don't fly under the influence of drugs or alcohol

Keep away from emergency responders

For more information, visit: www.faa.gov/uas/model_aircraft

B4UFLY Smartphone

 App

Additional Resources

General Information about UAS:

www.faa.gov/uas
Clear status icon shows flight

 restrictions and requirements in your

 current or planned location

Interactive maps with filtering options

Available soon in the App Store and

 Google Play Store

Information about how to fly safely

 and responsibly:

www.faa.gov/uas/model_aircraft

www.knowbeforeyoufly.org

www.modelaircraft.org

Information about flight requirements

 and restrictions:

www.faa.gov/go/uastfr

faa.gov/tfr

www.faa.gov/no_drone_zone/dc
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Judicial Conference - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"h0i4Gp80TY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/conference\/\">Judicial Conference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/conference\/embed\/#?secret=h0i4Gp80TY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Judicial Conference” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"h0i4Gp80TY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"By statute, the Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit may hold a conference \u201cfor the purpose of considering the business of the courts and advising means of improving the administration of justice within the circuit.\u201d 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 333.  These conferences are typically held in even-numbered years and have open registration for all members of [...]"}
No. 11-9251.

#### Ortiz-Valdez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-8446.

#### Outram *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### § 10.310 Federal alert gateway. [Reserved]
pNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LOUIS COOPERSMITH, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-4086 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed August 22, 2014.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; William R. Webb, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

SLEET, Judge.

Louis Coopersmith appeals his judgment and sentence after his probation

was revoked. We affirm. However, we remand for the order of r evocation to be

corrected to list the conditions that Coopersmith was found to have violated. See Baker

v. State, 133 So. 3d 1209 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

CASANUEVA and CRENS HAW, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [REG-107872-99] 
          - RIN 1545-AX18 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking.

# SUMMARY:

This document provides notice of cancellation of a public hearing on proposed regulations relating to the allocation of basis adjustments among partnership assets under section 755. 

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for Wednesday, July 12, 2000, at 10 a.m., is cancelled. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

LaNita Van Dyke of the Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-7190 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and/or notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Wednesday, April 5, 2000, (65 FR 17829), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for Wednesday, July 12, 2000, at 10 a.m., in room 2716, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is proposed regulations under section 755 of the Internal Revenue Code. The public comment period for these proposed regulations expires on Wednesday, July 5, 2000. The outlines of topics to be addressed at the hearing were due on Wednesday, June 21, 2000.                 

The notice of proposed rulemaking and/or notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Tuesday, June 27, 2000, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for Wednesday, July 12, 2000, is cancelled. 

Cynthia Grigsby,

Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).

[FR Doc. 00-16972 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 20

- 00067

- CV

IN RE MARTY, INC.
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 5, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 30, 2020, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for stay of
the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus.
Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial cou rt
clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy
by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
After considering the petition and the record, this court c oncludes relator did not show it is entitled
to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P . 52.8(a). Relator’s motion for temporary relief is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises ou t of Cause No. 2017CI03051, styled Myron L. Evans v. Marty Inc. , pending in the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. presiding.
Argued and submitted June 7,

reversed July 26, 1995

#### In the Matter of Phillip Erwin, a Child. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MALHEUR COUNTY, *Respondent, v.*Phillip ERWIN, *Appellant.*

(94-03-5765-J; CA A85353)

899 P2d 758

Lynn M. Travis, Juvenile Rights Project, Inc., argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Kaye E. Sunderland, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*695PER CURIAM

This is an appeal by child from an order finding him within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court by reason of having committed the crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135(1)(a). ORS 419C.005. He argues that the Juvenile Department did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt the allegation that he knowingly rode in a stolen vehicle. We review *de novo.*ORS 419A.200(5).

The evidence most favorable to the Department on the issue of child’s knowledge is as follows: Child was a passenger in a stolen pickup that Hatfield drove from Ontario to Bend. In Bend, child’s girlfriend asked him if the vehicle was stolen. He replied that Hatfield had told him that it belonged to Hatfield’s grandfather. Although there is evidence that child was familiar with the members of Hatfield’s “immediate” family, and that no one in Hatfield’s “immediate family” owned a vehicle like the one in which child rode, there is no persuasive evidence that child knew what vehicles Hatfield’s grandfather owned or whether the grandfather was considered a member of Hatfield’s “immediate” family. We agree with child’s argument that the Department has not met its burden of proof.

Reversed.
No. 11-106.

#### City of San Leandro, California *v.*International Church of the Foursquare Gospel.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4552 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4552

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel RENDEZVOUS.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1994

Mr. Romero-Barcelo introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel RENDEZVOUS.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel RENDEZVOUS (United 
States official number 924140).

                                 <all>
```
#### § 101.1425 RF exposure.

MVDDS stations in the 12.2-12.7 GHz frequency band shall ensure compliance with the Commission's radio frequency exposure requirements in § 1.1307(b) of this chapter. An Environmental Assessment may be required if RF radiation from the proposed facilities would, in combination with radiation from other sources, cause RF power density or field strength in an accessible area to exceed the applicable limits specified in § 1.1310 of this chapter.

[85 FR 18151, Apr. 1, 2020]
---

EXHIBIT 32(b)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Hendrx
  Corp. (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended September 30,
  2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (Report), I, Susan Liu, chief financial officer, hereby certify,
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                       
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly
      represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operation of the Registrant.

*/s/ Susan Liu*_________________
  Susan Liu 
  Chief Financial Officer 
  November 14, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes
of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906
has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"17-2234: HUDICK v. WILKIE [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cSDfKpEUUu\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-03-2018-17-2234-hudick-v-wilkie-opinion-nonprecedential-17-2234-opinion-12-3-2018\/\">17-2234: HUDICK v. WILKIE [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-03-2018-17-2234-hudick-v-wilkie-opinion-nonprecedential-17-2234-opinion-12-3-2018\/embed\/#?secret=cSDfKpEUUu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“17-2234: HUDICK v. WILKIE [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"cSDfKpEUUu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: HUDICK v. WILKIE [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 17-2234 Origin: CAVC Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16903]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 3355]


Universal Postal Union Reform Initiatives

DEPARTMENT: United States Department of State.

ACTION: Notice of briefing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State will host a briefing on Tuesday, 
September 26, 2000, to provide an update on reform initiatives at the 
Universal Postal Union (UPU).
    The briefing will be held from 2:00 p.m. until approximately 4:00 
p.m., on September 26, 2000, in Room 1105 of the Department of State, 
2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC. The briefing will be open to the 
public up to the capacity of the meeting room.
    The briefing will provide information on the results of the recent 
meetings of the High-Level Group on the Future of the UPU, and of the 
UPU Postal Operations Council, as well as on other significant UPU-
related issues. The briefing will be chaired by Ambassador E. Michael 
Southwick of the Department of State.
    Entry to the Department of State building is controlled and will be 
facilitated by advance arrangements. In order to arrange admittance, 
persons desiring to attend the briefing should, no later than noon on 
September 25, 2000, notify the Office of Technical and Specialized 
Agencies, Bureau of International Organization Affairs, Department of 
State, preferably by fax, providing the name of the meeting and the 
individual's name, Social Security number, date of birth, professional 
affiliation, address and telephone number. The fax number to use is 
(202) 647-8902. Voice telephone is (202) 647-2752. This request applies 
to both government and non-government individuals.
    All attendees must use the Department of State diplomatic entrance 
at 22nd and C Streets, NW. One of the following means of identification 
will be required for admittance: Any U.S. driver's license with photo, 
a passport, or any U.S. Government agency identification card.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning the briefing may 
be directed to Mr. Neil Boyer at (202) 647-1044.

    Dated: June 27, 2000.
Neil A. Boyer,
Acting Director, Office of Technical and Specialized Agencies, Bureau 
of International Organization Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-16903 Filed 7-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP00-389-000]


ONEOK WestTex Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Application

June 23, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 13, 2000, ONEOK WestTex Transmission, Inc. 
(WesTex), 100 West Fifth Street, P.O. Box 871, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74102, a 
Hinshaw pipeline, filed in Docket No. CP00-389-000 an application 
pursuant to section 284.224(b) of the Commission's regulations, seeking 
confirmation that it has a blanket certificate, or in the alternative 
to grant such a blanket certificate. This filing may be viewed on the 
web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims,htm (call 202-208-2222).
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said application should on or before July 10, 2000, file 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20426, a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16419 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M