alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"18-1798: TQ DELTA, LLC v. DISH NETWORK LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kcWD0nzfkf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/7-15-2019-18-1798-tq-delta-llc-v-dish-network-llc-rule-36-judgment-18-1798-rule_36_judgment-7-15-2019-1\/\">18-1798: TQ DELTA, LLC v. DISH NETWORK LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/7-15-2019-18-1798-tq-delta-llc-v-dish-network-llc-rule-36-judgment-18-1798-rule_36_judgment-7-15-2019-1\/embed\/#?secret=kcWD0nzfkf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“18-1798: TQ DELTA, LLC v. DISH NETWORK LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"kcWD0nzfkf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: TQ DELTA, LLC v. DISH NETWORK LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT](pdf) Appeal Number: 18-1798 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
No. 11-5234.

#### Gay *v.*Evans, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0971 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2011-CE-030-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

 NO COMMENTS RECEIVED – If this box is checked, no signatures are required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

19–011 2012

112th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 112–136 

CONTINUATION OF EMERGENCY REGARDING EXPORT 

CONTROL REGULATIONS 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY REGARDING 

EXPORT CONTROL REGULATIONS, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d) 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2012.—Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 

ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with HDOCE:\Seals\Congress.#13

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 15, 2012. 

Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies 

Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of 

a national emergency unless, within the 90-day period prior to the 

anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in the 

Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating 

that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary 

date. In accordance with this provision, I have sent to the Federal 

Register for publication the enclosed notice, stating that the emergency caused by the lapse of the Export Administration Act of 

1979, as amended, is to continue in effect for 1 year beyond August 

17, 2012. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with HDOC

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
(3) 

NOTICE

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO

EXPORT CONTROL REGULATIONS

On August 17, 2001, consistent with the authority provided to 

the President under the International Emergency Economic Powers 

Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the President issued Executive Order 

13222. In that order, he declared a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States in light of the 

expiration of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended 

(50 U.S.C. App. 2401 et seq.). Because the Export Administration 

Act has not been renewed by the Congress, the national emergency 

declared on August 17, 2001, must continue in effect beyond August 17, 2012. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 

National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 

1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13222. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, August 15, 2012. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
EXHIBIT 32.1
TECHLABS, INC.
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Techlabs, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jayme
Dorrough, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:    November 16, 2006


         /s/ JAYME DORROUGH
         ------------------
         Jayme Dorrough
         Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(a)








This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.








Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United States Code








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael G. Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Michael G. Morris


Michael G. Morris


Chief Executive Officer








July 30, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature:

Project No.: 0317.02.005.510 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: DMR2013 CBI?

Yes

No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

Outgoing

Date: 11/14/14 Time: 2:30 am

pm

Company Name: North Carolina DENR ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Bartell

Contact Name: Marcia Allocco Contact Phone Number: (704) 235-2204

General Subject: 2013 DMR Cyanide Discharges for ALCOA in Badin, NC

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

Marcia Allocco: 704-235-2204

On November 14th, I called Ms. Allocco and left a message. 

On November 17th, Ms. Allocco returned my call. She stated that the facility does not have any permit limits for 

cyanide, the permit requires monitoring only. The permit is expired and has not been renewed yet. She stated 

that the facility does not currently perform smelting practices and has not done so for many years. Ms. Allocco 

was able to confirm the DMR data and an error was identified, all cyanide discharges are listed on the DMR in 

ug/L, the DMR loading tool has them as mg/L. See corrected data below. Ms. Allocco also stated that North 

Carolina still has manual entry for DMRs. 

Correct DMR Data for ALCOA:

1/31/13: no discharge

2/28/13: 14 ug/L

3/31/13: 33 ug/L

4/30/13: 27 ug/L

5/31/13: 23 ug/L

6/30/13: 20 ug/L

7/31/13: 54 ug/L

8/31/13: 49 ug/L

9/30/13: 17 ug/L

10/31/13: 14 ug/L

11/30/13: 8 ug/L

12/31/13: 9.7 ug/L
#### Maria VILLALBA-FRANCO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General,* Respondent.

*994No. 02-72338.

Before B. FLETCHER, WARDLAW, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 2004.**

Decided March 24, 2004.

Maria Villalba-Franco, Simi Valley, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lagu-na Niguel, CA, Los Angeles District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, OIL, William C. Minick, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*

 John Ashcroft is the proper respondent. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect the above caption.

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Maria Villalba-Franco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of deportation and denial of her application for suspension of deportation. This case is governed by the transitional rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. *See Antonio-Cruz v. INS,*147 F.3d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1998). We have jurisdiction to review due process challenges, but we lack jurisdiction to review certain discretionary decisions by the IJ. *See id.*We deny the petition in part, and dismiss in part.

Petitioner’s contention that the BIA’s affirmance without opinion violates due process is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 851 (9th Cir.2003).

Petitioner also attempts to argue the merits of her application for suspension of deportation. Because the IJ denied Petitioner’s application as a matter of discretion, we lack jurisdiction to review this decision. *See Kalaw v. INS,*133 F.3d 1147, 1152-53 (9th Cir.1997).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### § 32.4370 Other jurisdictional liabilities and deferred credits—net.

This account shall include the cumulative impact on liabilities and deferred credits of the jurisdictional ratemaking practices which vary from those of this Commission. All entries recorded in this account shall be recorded net of any applicable income tax effects and shall be supported by appropriate subsidiary records where necessary as provided for in § 32.13 of subpart B.
§ 15.102 CPU boards and power supplies used in personal computers. ( a ) Authorized CPU boards and power supplies that are sold as separate components shall be supplied with complete installation instructions. These instructions shall specify all of the installation procedures that must be followed to ensure compliance with the standards, including, if necessary, the type of enclosure, e.g., a metal enclosure, proper grounding techniques, the use of shielded cables, the addition of any needed components, and any necessary modifications to additional components. ( 1 ) Any additional parts needed to ensure compliance with the standards, except for the enclosure, are considered to be special accessories and, in accordance with § 15.27, must be marketed with the CPU board or power supply.
( 2 ) Any modifications that must be made to a personal computer, peripheral device, CPU board or power supply during installation of a CPU board or power supply must be simple enough that they can be performed by the average consumer. Parts requiring soldering, disassembly of circuitry or other similar modifications are not permitted.
( b ) Assemblers of personal computer systems employing modular CPU boards and/or power supplies are not required to test the resulting system provided the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) Each device used in the system has been authorized as required under this part (according to § 15.101(e), some subassemblies used in a personal computer system may not require an authorization);
( 2 ) The original label and identification on each piece of equipment remain unchanged;
( 3 ) Each responsible party's instructions to ensure compliance (including, if necessary, the use of shielded cables or other accessories or modifications) are followed when the system is assembled;
( 4 ) If the system is marketed, the resulting equipment combination is authorized under Supplier's Declaration of Conformity pursuant to § 15.101(c)(4) and a compliance information statement, as described in § 2.1077(b) of this chapter, is supplied with the system. Marketed systems shall also comply with the labeling requirements in § 15.19 and must be supplied with the information required under §§ 15.21, 15.27 and 15.105; and
( 5 ) The assembler of a personal computer system may be required to test the system and/or make necessary modifications if a system is found to cause harmful interference or to be noncompliant with the appropriate standards in the configuration in which it is marketed (see §§ 2.909, 15.1, 15.27(d) and 15.101(e)).
[61 FR 31050, June 19, 1996, as amended at 82 FR 50833, Nov. 2, 2017]
§ 15.211 Tunnel radio systems. An intentional radiator utilized as part of a tunnel radio system may operate on any frequency provided it meets all of the following conditions: ( a ) Operation of a tunnel radio system (intentional radiator and all connecting wires) shall be contained solely within a tunnel, mine or other structure that provides attenuation to the radiated signal due to the presence of naturally surrounding earth and/or water.
( b ) Any intentional or unintentional radiator external to the tunnel, mine or other structure, as described in paragraph (a) of this section, shall be subject to the other applicable regulations contained within this part.
( c ) The total electromagnetic field from a tunnel radio system on any frequency or frequencies appearing outside of the tunnel, mine or other structure described in paragraph (a) of this section, shall not exceed the limits shown in § 15.209 when measured at the specified distance from the surrounding structure, including openings. Particular attention shall be paid to the emissions from any opening in the structure to the outside environment. When measurements are made from the openings, the distances shown in § 15.209 refer to the distance from the plane of reference which fits the entire perimeter of each above ground opening.
( d ) The conducted limits in § 15.207 apply to the radiofrequency voltage on the public utility power lines outside of the tunnel.
791 A.2d 215

#### IN THE MATTER OF LAWRENCE J. MCGIVNEY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

March 8, 2002.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-060, concluding that a letter of admonition should be issued to LAWRENCE J. McGIVNEY of FLORHAM PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, for violating *RPC*3.3(a)(5) (failure to disclose material fact knowing that tribunal may be mislead), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
No. 11-5466.

#### O’Connell *v.*Harrington, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 3.52 Complaint/inquiry resolution procedures. ( a ) Accounting authorities must maintain procedures for resolving complaints and/or inquiries from its contractual customers (vessels for which it performs settlements), the FCC, the ITU, and foreign administrations or their agents. These procedures must be available to the Commission upon request.
( b ) If a foreign administration requests assistance in collection of accounts from ships licensed by the FCC, the appropriate accounting authority will provide all information requested by the Commission in a timely manner to enable the Commission to determine the cause of the complaint and to resolve the issue. If accounts are in dispute, the Commission will determine the amount due the foreign administration, accounting authority or ROA, and may direct the accounting authority to pay the accounts to the foreign administration. If the accounting authority does not pay the disputed accounts within a reasonable timeframe, the Commission may take action to levy a forfeiture, cancel the AAIC privilege and/or to revoke any operating authority or licenses held by that accounting authority. (See also § 3.72).
# Ryan Shipley Promotion to Colonel, U.S Army

/ Published Feb. 3, 2022

Congratulations to Ryan Shipley on his promotion to Colonel, US Army. COL Shipley will bring his expertise and experience to a new role as Associate Dean of Academics with the College of Information and Cyberspace.
#### § 22.169 International coordination.

Operation of systems and channel assignments under this part are subject to the applicable provisions and requirements of treaties and other international agreements between the United States government and the governments of Canada and Mexico.

[82 FR 17582, Apr. 12, 2017]
Editorial Note on Part 36
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 36 appear at 74 FR 23956, May 22, 2009, 77 FR 30411, May 23, 2012, 82 FR 25538, June 2, 2017, and corrected at 83 FR 4153, Jan. 30, 2018. Nomenclature changes to part 36 also appear at 83 FR 63587, Dec. 11, 2018, and 84 FR 4360, Feb. 15, 2019.

§ 36.157 Host/remote message Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF)—Category 4—apportionment procedures. ( a ) *Host/Remote Message C&WF—Category 4.* The cost of host/remote C&WF used for message circuits, i.e., circuits carrying only message traffic, is included in this category. ( 1 ) The cost of host/remote message C&WF excluding WATS closed end access lines for the study area is apportioned on the basis of the relative number of study area minutes-of-use kilometers applicable to such facilities.
( 2 ) The cost of host/remote message C&WF used for WATS closed end access for the study area is directly assigned to the appropriate jurisdiction.
( b ) Effective July 1, 2001, through December 31, 2024, all study areas shall apportion Category 4 Host/Remote message Cable and Wire Facilities C&WF among the jurisdictions using the relative number of study area minutes-of-use kilometers applicable to such facilities, as specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, for the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2000. Direct assignment of any Category 4 equipment to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually.
[52 FR 17229, May 6, 1987, as amended at 58 FR 44905, Aug. 25, 1993; 66 FR 33206, June 21, 2001; 75 FR 30301, June 1, 2010; 76 FR 30841, May 27, 2011; 79 FR 36237, June 26, 2014]