alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
   
        We consent to the use of our report dated January 13, 1997 in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Connective Therapeutics, Inc. (also known as
Connetics Corporation) for the year ended December 31, 1996, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements, as amended, included in this Form
10-K/A-2.

    

        We also consent to the incorporation by reference to the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-04985) pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, 1994 Stock Plan and 1995 Director Stock Option Plan of
Connective Therapeutics, Inc. (also known as Connetics Corporation), of our
report dated January 13, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Connective Therapeutics, Inc. (also known as Connectics
Corporation) included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.

                                        ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

   

Palo Alto, California
April 25, 1997
#### Charles GOODE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Ronald ANGELONE; Virginia Department of Corrections, Intake and Legal Services, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-6149.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 2004.

Decided March 19, 2004.

Charles Goode, Appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Charles Goode appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for *57writ of mandamus for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Goode v. Angelone,*No. CA-03-891-2 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 5, 2004; entered Jan. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
# IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING SPRING 2019 ADMISSIONS TO THE FALL 2019 TERM

/ Published Dec. 20, 2018
      - Admissions to the Chief Information Officer (CIO), Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), Cyber Leadership (Cyber-L) and Information Technology Program Management (ITPM) certificate programs are closed. No new applications will be accepted.
      - Admissions to the Master of Science in Government Information Leadership (M.S. GIL) with concentrations in CIO, Cyber Security (Cyber-S), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and ITPM is only open to existing CIC students who have successfully completed at least 5 courses applicable to the selected concentration. New applicants will not be admitted. 
      - Admissions to the M.S. GIL Cyber-L concentration are closed. No new applications will be accepted.
      - Admissions to the Data Strategy and Analytics (DSA) certificate program is open to existing CIC student and new applicants.
      - Admissions to the CFO Certificate is open to existing CIC students and new applicants. 
      - Admissions to the Chief Information Officer - Leadership Development Program (CIO-LDP) are closed. The next CIO-LDP Cohort will be held in Spring 2020. 

Additional details regarding Spring 2019 Admissions for the Fall 2019 Term can be found on our Admissions Page.
No. 11-5404.

#### Jackson *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4424 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4424

     To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel for 
 employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1994

Mr. Gilchrest introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel for 
 employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, notwithstanding 
sections 12105, 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States 
Code, and section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 
883), as applicable on the date of this Act, the Secretary of the 
Department in which the Coast Guard is operating may issue a 
certificate of documentation for the vessel SALLIE-D (Maryland 
certification number MD2655AA).

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.29


 


 


 


 






    	 	1	 



    	 



    

 


 






    	 	2	 



    	 



    

 


 






    	 	3	 



    	 



    

 


 






    	 	4	 



    	 



    

 


 






    	 	5	 



    	 



    

 


 






    	 	6	 



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	 	7
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, David S. Brooks, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Fittipaldi Logistics, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Fittipaldi Logistics, Inc.

                                  FITTIPALDI LOGISTICS, INC.

                                  /s/ David S. Brooks
                                  -------------------
                                  David S. Brooks
                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                  Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

May 15, 2007
§ 27.1255 Relocation criteria for Broadband Radio Service licensees in the 2150-2160/62 MHz band. ( a ) An AWS licensee in the 2150-2160/62 MHz band, prior to initiating operations from any base or fixed station that is co-channel to the 2150-2160/62 MHz band, must relocate any incumbent BRS system that is within the line of sight of the AWS licensee's base or fixed station. For purposes of this section, a determination of whether an AWS facility is within the line of sight of a BRS system will be made as follows: ( 1 ) For a BRS system using the 2150-2160/62 MHz band exclusively to provide one-way transmissions to subscribers, the AWS licensee will determine whether there is an unobstructed signal path (line of sight) to the incumbent licensee's geographic service area (GSA), based on the following criteria: use of 9.1 meters (30 feet) for the receiving antenna height, use of the actual transmitting antenna height and terrain elevation, and assumption of 4/3 Earth radius propagation conditions. Terrain elevation data must be obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3-second database. All coordinates used in carrying out the required analysis shall be based upon use of NAD-83.
( 2 ) For all other BRS systems using the 2150-2160/62 MHz band, the AWS licensee will determine whether there is an unobstructed signal path (line of sight) to the incumbent licensee's receive station hub using the method prescribed in “Methods for Predicting Interference from Response Station Transmitters and to Response Station Hubs and for Supplying Data on Response Station Systems. MM Docket 97-217,” in Amendment of Parts 1, 21 and 74 to Enable Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Licensees to Engage in Fixed Two-Way Transmissions, MM Docket No. 97-217, *Report and Order on Further Reconsideration and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,* 15 FCC Rcd 14566 at 14610, Appendix D.
( b ) Any AWS licensee in the 2110-2180 MHz band that causes actual and demonstrable interference to a BRS licensee in the 2150-2160/62 MHz band must take steps to eliminate the harmful interference, up to and including relocation of the BRS licensee, regardless of whether it would be required to do so under paragraph (a), of this section.
§ 27.702 Designated entities. ( a ) *Eligibility for small business provisions.* ( 1 ) An entrepreneur is an entity that, together with its controlling interests and affiliates, has average gross revenues not exceeding $3 million for the preceding three years. This definition applies only with respect to licenses in Block C (710-716 MHz and 740-746 MHz) as specified in § 27.5(c)(1).
( 2 ) A very small business is an entity that, together with its controlling interests and affiliates, has average gross revenues not exceeding $15 million for the preceding three years.
( 3 ) A small business is an entity that, together with its controlling interests and affiliates, has average gross revenues not exceeding $40 million for the preceding three years.
( b ) *Bidding credits.* A winning bidder that qualifies as an entrepreneur, as defined in this section, or a consortium of entrepreneurs may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(i) of this chapter. A winning bidder that qualifies as a very small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of very small businesses may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(ii) of this chapter. A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business, as defined in this section, or a consortium of small businesses may use the bidding credit specified in § 1.2110(f)(2)(iii) of this chapter.
[67 FR 5512, Feb. 6, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 43000, July 21, 2003]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2018-1322: Rosetta-Wireless Corporation v. Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xeu31sQydy\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/3-07-2019-2018-1322-rosetta-wireless-corporation-v-samsung-electronic-co-ltd-audio-uploaded\/\">2018-1322: Rosetta-Wireless Corporation v. Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/3-07-2019-2018-1322-rosetta-wireless-corporation-v-samsung-electronic-co-ltd-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=xeu31sQydy\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2018-1322: Rosetta-Wireless Corporation v. Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"xeu31sQydy\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Rosetta-Wireless Corporation v. Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd (mp3) Appeal Number: 2018-1322 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
No. 11-8708.

#### Solis *v.*Harrison, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., 

Appellant

v.

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of 

Commerce for Intellectual Property and 

Director of the United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, 

Intervenor

______________________

2020-1991, 2020-2023

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,783, 

95/002,189, 95/002,204.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceedings are DISMISSED under Fed. R. 

App. P. 42 (b).

Case: 20-1991 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 08/17/2022
2 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. V. VIDAL 

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

August 17, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 17, 2022

Case: 20-1991 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 08/17/2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-224-002]

Take notice that on June 23, 2000, Transwestern Pipeline Company (Transwestern), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to be effective March 27, 2000.

2 Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 95E

Transwestern states that this filing is made to comply with the Commission's June 8, 2000 order accepting the tariff sheets filed by Transwestern in this proceeding, subject to Transwestern specifying that all releases of more than 31 days, but less than 1 year, prearranged or otherwise, must be posted for bidding.

Transwestern states that copies of the filing were served upon Transwestern's customers and interested State Commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16999  Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Federal Circuit Resources - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"NabOd2LGDi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/unrepresented-parties\/federal-circuit-resources\/\">Federal Circuit Resources<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/home\/information-for\/unrepresented-parties\/federal-circuit-resources\/embed\/#?secret=NabOd2LGDi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Federal Circuit Resources” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"NabOd2LGDi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The following resources may be helpful in explaining the role of the Federal Circuit in the appellate process and how cases proceed through the Federal Circuit. About the U.S. Courts of Appeals (external) About the Federal Circuit Jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit Overview of Cases in the Federal Circuit (pdf)  Federal Circuit Rules of Practice [...]"}
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Section
      1350**


**CERTIFICATION**








The
      undersigned officer hereby certifies
      that, to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE
      Corporation for the quarter endedSeptember 30,
      2007 as to which this Certification is
      an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the
      information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE
      Corporation.





SignedNovember
      6,2007.








John
                C. Fanning,Chairman
                and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Team Health Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”)for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Greg Roth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: May 11, 2010
## WINDYCITYCHARTER 1098 S. Milwaukee Avenue • Suite 301 • Wheeling, IL 60090 • 847-808-1188 www.WindyCityAviation.com

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington D.C. 20590 To whom it may concern: We, Windy City Charter, certificate number ZRGA418U, and Windy City Flyers, LOA number WDEJGL03 would like to extend our exemption: exemption number 10245 from 14 CFR (FAR Section)- Part 120 and docket numberFAA-20 11-0266. We are currently covered for our 135 and 91.147 LOA by an approved FAA/DOT drug and alcohol testing program, through a Consortium 

### IThird Party Administrator: Professional Air Charter Services, Inc. Program Manager, John Carpenter DrugAbatement 

### IAMPP Consortium Kansas City, MO 816-942-2144 Sincerely,

Dean Ellis

.. ;
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Quarterly Report of HIV-VAC Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the year period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Murray,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending December 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HIV-VAC
         Inc.

Dated: August 31, 2010

/s/ Kevin Murray
Kevin Murray
Chief Financial Officer