alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








	
					
	 
	 
	The Dow Chemical Company and Subsidiaries
	 
	EXHIBIT 10(dd)(iii)

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 






Fifth Amendment to 
The Dow Chemical Company 
Elective Deferral Plan (Post 2004)




Pursuant to Section 9.01 of The Dow Chemical Company Elective Deferral Plan (Post 2004)(the “Plan”), the undersigned hereby adopts the following amendments to the Plan, effective immediately: 
1.  The following sentence is added at the end of the third paragraph of Article I:
On January 19, 2017, the Plan was amended to add provisions regarding participation by employees of Dow Corning Corporation and certain subsidiaries.
2.  The second sentence of Section 4.01(a) is amended to substitute “December 15” for “November 30.” 
3.  The following paragraph is added at the end of Section 4.01(a):
An Eligible Employee of Dow Corning Corporation who was a participant in the Dow Corning Supplemental Savings Plan as of December 31, 2016 shall not be considered a newly Eligible Employee for purposes of the preceding paragraph. 
4.  The following paragraph is added at the end of Section 4.02(a):
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the preceding paragraph, however, an Eligible Employee who was an employee of Dow Corning Corporation for any period prior to January 1, 2017 may not elect to defer under this Plan: (x) any portion of an AVIP Award earned prior to January 1, 2017; or (y) any portion of an LTIP Award for a performance cycle beginning before January 1, 2017.  For purposes of this paragraph:  (i) “AVIP Award” means that portion of a Participant’s compensation payable as an annual bonus under the Dow Corning Corporation’s Annual Variable Incentive Program; and (ii) “LTIP Award” means a Participant’s award under any long-term incentive plan sponsored by Dow Corning Corporation, including but not limited to the Dow Corning Corporation Performance Excellence Plan.


	
	
	/s/ BRYAN JENDRETZKE

	Bryan Jendretzke

	Global Benefits Director

	The Dow Chemical Company








170







	
		
	Reviewed by Plan Administrator:
	/s/ MARIA CURRERI

	 
	Maria Curreri

	 
	 

	Reviewed by Legal Department:
	/s/ BRITA DE MALIGNON

	 
	Brita de Malignon

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Dated: January 19, 2017
	 










171
1967 

1968 

1969 

1970 

1971 

1972 

1973 

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:21:30-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Send home
Each page in the book illustrates a 

particular fire safety message highlighted in the SESAME STREET 

Fire Safety Station program. These 

messages include Plan and Practice Home 

Escape Plans; Smoke Alarms Warn About Fires; 

Hot Things Burn; Get Out and Stay Out!; Stop, 

Drop, and Roll; and Firefighters Rescue People 

and Put Out Fires. You will help your 

child to protect himself if you 

teach Hot Things Burn and Get Out 

and Stay Out! first.





This project is made possible by generous support from the U.S. Fire 

Administration.

Illustrations: Ernest Kwiat

Lyrics reprinted with permission. © 1997 Sesame Street, Inc. and 

Splotched Animal Music.

Sesame Street® and associated characters, trademarks and design 

elements are owned and licensed by Sesame Workshop.

© 2005 Sesame Workshop. All rights reserved.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PATRICK H. CAREY,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent

______________________ 

2018-1479

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. CH-0752-16-0423-I-3.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

NORMAN JACKMAN, Jackman & Roth, LLP, Lincoln, 

NH, argued for petitioner. 

 VITO SALVATORE SOLITRO, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also 

represented by CLAUDIA BURKE, ROBERT EDWARD 

KIRSCHMAN, JR., JOSEPH H. HUNT. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

November 7, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
FLORIDA

FLORIDA

MONROE CO

MONROE CO

GULF OF MEXICO

Gull

Keys

Mooney Harbor Key

Marquesas Keys

Gull

Keys

Rebecca Shoal

Channel

Straits of Florida

Mooney

Harbor

New

Ground

The Quicksands

Rebecca

Shoal

Isaac

Shoal Halfmoon Shoal

Marquesas

Keys West

Marquesas

Keys East

000m 75

74

27

27

27

27

27

84

80

74

14

78

3

3

27

27

27

3

27

18

23

27

3

17

000m

27

3

20

3

3

19

13

83

12

27

27

77

76

20

23

80

85 3

000m

11

3 3

15

82

27

27

27

12' 10'

280 000

E

30"

FEET

82°

24°

37' 24° 3

30" 10' 82°

3

3 24°

27

82°

32'

35'

07' 3

27

77

21

000

82°

3

30"

30"

27

27

3

15

85

N

30'

27

3

76

22

75

12

3

27

27

16

3

FEET

32'

3

37' 78

22

11

79 81

81

21

16

83 84

17

N

13

E

70

19

3

30"

30"

07'

30"

82

27

27

14

27

15'

000

3

79 12'

24°

FEET 3

18

30"

15'

FEET

3 250

35'

30' 000m

100 000

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

FLORIDA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

MARQUESAS KEYS WEST, FL

2012

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

MARQUESAS KEYS WEST QUADRANGLE

FLORIDA-MONROE CO.

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Imagery......................................................NAIP, May 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours..........................................................Not Available

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 17R

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Florida Coordinate System of 1983 (east

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.3

CONTOURS NOT PRESENT BECAUSE AVAILABLE ELEVATION

DATA DO NOT MEET ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

LH

17R

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2012 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 30 ́

9 MILS

4° 38 ́

83 MILS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-2270: PHARMACYCLICS LLC v. ALVOGEN, INC. [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tNBcQLS7M7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-15-2022-21-2270-pharmacyclics-llc-v-alvogen-inc-opinion-21-2270-opinion-11-15-2022_2033497\/\">21-2270: PHARMACYCLICS LLC v. ALVOGEN, INC. [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-15-2022-21-2270-pharmacyclics-llc-v-alvogen-inc-opinion-21-2270-opinion-11-15-2022_2033497\/embed\/#?secret=tNBcQLS7M7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-2270: PHARMACYCLICS LLC v. ALVOGEN, INC. [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"tNBcQLS7M7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: PHARMACYCLICS LLC v. ALVOGEN, INC. [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-2270 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

November 5, 2015

No. 10-15-00274-CR

PATRICK DEMON STEWART

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

From the 87th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-153-CR

**JUDGMENT**

	Patrick Demon Stewart’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal was considered by the Court.  The Court grants the motion.  It is the judgment of this Court that the appeal is dismissed.  

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

PER CURIAM

SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK

By: ___________________________

							Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 4566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1673]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-070-00-1020-PA]


Supplementary Rule Regarding Operation of Motorized Vehicles in 
Developed Recreation Sites on Public Lands in Montana

AGENCY:  Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION:  Establishment of a Supplementary Rule establishing guidelines 
for the operation of off-road vehicles within developed recreational 
sites on public lands administered by the BLM Butte Field Office in the 
state of Montana.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Off-road vehicle use in developed recreation sites has 
resulted in conflicts between vehicle operators and other public land 
site visitors. Safety hazards occur with unlimited vehicle use in 
congested, developed recreation sites. Vehicle operation off roadways 
in developed campgrounds and picnic areas has caused considerable 
damage to natural resources and public property resulting in increased 
operational and maintenance costs. The developed recreation sites 
listed below shall be closed to the use and operation of off-road 
vehicles from April 15 thru October 15. Off-road vehicle operation 
outside these dates shall be limited to existing roads, parking lots 
and campsite pull-ins. Sites administered by the Butte Field Office 
affected by this restriction notice include:

Yellowstone River--Carbella.
Big Hole River--East Bank, Dickie Bridge, Bryant Creek, Jerry Creek, 
Upper and Lower Divide.
Missouri River--Upper and Lower Toston, Devils Elbow, Holter Dam, 
Holter Lake, Log Gulch and Departure Point.

    This Supplementary Rule is issued under authority of 43 CFR 8365.1-
6.
    Penalties: As prescribed under the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act, 43 USC Section 1733(a). Violation is punishable by 
fines and/or imprisonment under 43 CFR 8360.0-7.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  To comply with the Administrative Procedures Act, this 
Supplementary Rule will go into effect 30 days after publication in the 
Federal Register if no substantive negative comments are received and 
will remain in effect until rescinded or modified by the authorized 
officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Steve Hartmann, Acting Field Manager, 
P.O. Box 3388, Butte, Montana 59702, 406-494-5059.

    Dated: January 12, 2000.
Steve Hartmann,
Acting Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-1673 Filed 1-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
Request of the Senate

No. 81-143

#### Opinion of the Justices

May 26, 1981

The following resolution, Senate Resolution No. 7, requesting an opinion of the justices was adopted by the Senate on April 22, 1981, and filed in the supreme court on April 29, 1981:

“Whereas, there is pending before the senate Senate Bill 39-FN, an act to repeal the interest and dividends tax; and

“Whereas, said bill provides for the repeal of chapter 77 of the Revised Statutes Annotated relative to the taxation of incomes; and

“Whereas, questions have arisen as to the constitutionality of the law which the proposed act is designed to repeal; now, therefore, be it

“Resolved by the Senate:

“That the Justices of the Supreme Court be respectfully requested to give their opinion upon the following questions:

“1 Does the supreme legislative power vested in the senate and the house of representatives pursuant to part 2, article 2d. of the constitution of New Hampshire include the power to tax the income of individuals, partnerships, associations, trusts, and fiduciaries?

“2 If the senate and the house of representatives may constitutionally tax income, are the classes of income which are taxed *424under RSA 77 valid classifications for purposes of taxation pursuant to part 2, articles 5th. and 6th. of the constitution of New Hampshire.

“Be it Further Resolved that the clerk of the Senate transmit 7 copies of this resolution and 7 copies of Senate Bill 39-FN to the Justices of the Supreme Court.”

The following reply was returned:

*To the Honorable Senate:*

We observe that if the first question of the resolution related to a specific, pending legislative proposal, we would be required by part II, article 74 of our constitution to respond to it. *See Opinion of the Justices,*82 N.H. 561, 570, 138 A. 284, 289 (1927). Paragraph three of the resolution, however, makes clear that the request of the Senate concerns the constitutionality of the existing statute, RSA ch. 77, which the proposed law is designed to repeal.

Question two of the resolution clearly concerns the constitutionality of an existing statute, RSA ch. 77. We have recently reaffirmed this court’s long-standing position that the State constitution, N.H. Const, pt. II, art. 74, does not permit the supreme court to advise the legislature on the constitutionality of existing laws. *Opinion of the Justices,*121 N.H. 280, 428 A.2d 909 (1981).

Under these circumstances, the justices of the supreme court respectfully request that they be excused from answering the questions contained in the resolution as not being within the spirit or letter of the constitutional provision, N.H. Const, pt. II, art. 74. *Opinion of the Justices,*121 N.H. 280, 282, 428 A.2d 909, 910 (1981); *Opinion of the Justices,*119 N.H. 266, 268, 401 A.2d 507, 508 (1979).

William A. Grimes

Maurice P. Bois

Charles G. Douglas, III

David A. Brock

John W. King

May 26,1981
No. 11-912.

#### First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. *v.*United States.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Opinion filed June 14 , 2018



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _ _____


### No. 11

- 1 6

- 00 030

- C V

_____ _ _____ 

### RICKY LANCE MILLER , INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE NANNIE LOU MILLER FAMILY TRUST, ET AL. , Appellant s

V.
PATRICIA MILLER LAUGHLIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE NANNIE LOU MILLER FAMILY TRUST , AND TONYA MILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF GARY

BRUCE MILLER, DECEASED, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 39 t h District Court
Haskell County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 11,977

- A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant s ha ve filed in this court a motion to di smis s this appeal. According

to the motion

, “ the parties have resolved their differences and have reached a full

and final settlement of all claims and controversies.” Appellants request that this2

appeal be dismissed with prejudice per the settlement agreement

— a copy of which

was attached to the motion to dismiss. I n accordance with Appellant s ’ request, we

dismiss th is appeal with prejudice

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1 (a)

. The motion to dismiss is granted, and th e appeal is dismissed

.

PER CURIAM

June 14 , 2018

Panel consists of: Willson , J., Bailey , J.

, and Wright, S.C.J. 1

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
§ 27.1184 Triggering a reimbursement obligation. ( a ) The clearinghouse will apply the following test to determine when an AWS entity has triggered a cost-sharing obligation and therefore must pay an AWS relocator of a BRS system in accordance with the formula detailed in § 27.1180: ( 1 ) All or part of the relocated BRS system was initially co-channel with the licensed AWS band(s) of the AWS entity;
( 2 ) An AWS relocator has paid the relocation costs of the BRS incumbent; and
( 3 ) The other AWS entity has turned on or is preparing to turn on a fixed base station at commercial power and the incumbent BRS system would have been within the line of sight of the AWS entity's fixed base station, defined as follows. ( i ) For a BRS system using the 2150-2160/62 MHz band exclusively to provide one-way transmissions to subscribers, the clearinghouse will determine whether there is an unobstructed signal path (line of sight) to the incumbent licensee's geographic service area (GSA), based on the following criteria: use of 9.1 meters (30 feet) for the receiving antenna height, use of the actual transmitting antenna height and terrain elevation, and assumption of 4/3 Earth radius propagation conditions. Terrain elevation data must be obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3-second database. All coordinates used in carrying out the required analysis shall be based upon use of NAD-83.
( ii ) For all other BRS systems using the 2150-2160/62 MHz band, the clearinghouse will determine whether there is an unobstructed signal path (line of sight) to the incumbent licensee's receive station hub using the method prescribed in “Methods for Predicting Interference from Response Station Transmitters and to Response Station Hubs and for Supplying Data on Response Station Systems. MM Docket 97-217,” in Amendment of 47 CFR parts 1, 21 and 74 to Enable Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Licensees to Engage in Fixed Two-Way Transmissions, MM Docket No. 97-217, *Report and Order on Further Reconsideration and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,* 15 FCC Rcd 14566 at 14610, Appendix D.
( b ) If the application of the trigger test described in paragraphs (a)(3)(i) and (ii) of this section, indicates that a reimbursement obligation exists, the clearinghouse will calculate the reimbursement amount in accordance with the cost-sharing formula and notify the subsequent AWS entity of the total amount of its reimbursement obligation.
( c ) Once a reimbursement obligation is triggered, the AWS entity may not avoid paying its cost-sharing obligation by deconstructing or modifying its facilities.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 841 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 841

  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain works, 
facilities, and titles of the Gila Project, and designated lands within 
 or adjacent to the Gila Project, to the Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and 
               Drainage District, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1999

   Mr. Pastor (for himself, Mr. Stump, Mr. Hayworth, and Mr. Kolbe) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain works, 
facilities, and titles of the Gila Project, and designated lands within 
 or adjacent to the Gila Project, to the Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and 
               Drainage District, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be referred to as the ``Wellton-Mohawk Transfer Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER.

    The Secretary of the Interior (``Secretary'') is authorized to 
carry out the terms of the Memorandum of Agreement No. 8-AA-34-WAO14 
(``Agreement'') dated July 10, 1998, between the Secretary and the 
Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District (``District'') 
providing for the transfer of works, facilities, and lands to the 
District, including conveyance of Acquired Lands, Public Lands, and 
Withdrawn Lands, as defined in the Agreement.

SEC. 3. WATER AND POWER CONTRACTS.

    Notwithstanding the transfer, the Secretary and the Secretary of 
Energy shall provide for and deliver Colorado River water and Parker-
Davis Project Priority Use Power to the District in accordance with the 
terms of existing contracts with the District, including any amendments 
or supplements thereto or extensions thereof and as provided under 
section 2 of the Agreement.

SEC. 4. SAVINGS.

    Nothing in this Act shall affect any obligations under the Colorado 
River Basin Salinity Control Act (Public Law 93-320; 43 U.S.C. 1571 et 
seq.).

SEC. 5. REPORT.

    If transfer of works, facilities, and lands pursuant to the 
Agreement has not occurred by July 1, 2000, the Secretary shall report 
on the status of the transfer as provided in section 5 of the 
Agreement.

SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




The
      Board
      of Directors




Capital
      Corp of the West:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
      (Nos. 333-125891 and 333-41440)
      on Form S-8 of Capital Corp of the West of our reports dated March 14,
      2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Capital Corp of the
      West and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related
      consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders’
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
      December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of
      internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
      December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006,
      annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Corp of the West.









/s/
      KPMG




Sacramento,
      California






March 14,
      2007