UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-KSB/A

|X|   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

                   For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

|_|   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      OF 1934

             For the transition period from __________ to __________

                        Commission file number 000-25855


                             VendingData Corporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)


            Nevada                                             91-1696010
-------------------------------                           -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                            (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                           Identification No.)


 6830 Spencer Street, Las Vegas, Nevada                          89119
----------------------------------------                  -------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                       (Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number: (702) 733-7195

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

      Title of each class              Name of each exchange on which registered

--------------------------------           --------------------------------

--------------------------------           --------------------------------

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

                          Common Stock, $.001 par value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              (Title of each class)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              (Title of each class)

      Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes |X| No |_|

      Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item
405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.

      State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $5,487,111

      State the aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates
computed by reference to the average bid and asked price of such common equity,
as of a specified date within the past 60 days. $18,585,391 ($1.95 per share as
of February 28, 2005)

      State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $.001 par value          17,199,558 shares as of February 28, 2005

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

      Part III of this report incorporates by reference portions of the proxy
statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2005).

      Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes |_| No |X|
<PAGE>

                                EXPLANATORY NOTE

      VendingData Corporation is filing this Amendment No. 2 to its Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 to reverse $2,050,551
of revenue recognized during the year ended December 31, 2004, with respect to
four contracts, and reduce inventory and cost of sales by $338,455 and $402,018,
respectively, as of December 31, 2004, and increase research and development,
and selling, general and administrative expenses during the year then ended by,
$238,475 and $502,565, respectively, and make other resulting adjustments to the
financial statements of the Company. The effect of the restatements was to
increase previously reported net loss by $2,389,066 ($0.13 per share) for the
year. These adjustments will not result in present or future cash expenditures.
(See "Restatement" in Note 1 to the financial statements in this Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A)

      The Items in our Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 that
are amended and restated are as follows: Item 6 - Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations; Part II: Item 7 -
Financial Statements; Part II: Item 8A - Controls and Procedures; and Part II:
Item 13 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

      The remaining Items contained within this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A consist of all other Items originally contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 in the form filed on
March 31, 2005, as amended on May 2, 2005. This Form 10-KSB/A does not reflect
events occurring after the filing of the original Form 10-KSB or the first
amendment to such report filed on May 2, 2005, or modify or update those
disclosures in any way other than as required to reflect the effects of the
restatement.


                                      -2-
<PAGE>

                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                            Page

PART I.........................................................................4

    Item 1.  Description of Business...........................................4
    Item 2.  Description of Property..........................................20
    Item 3.  Legal Proceedings................................................21
    Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders..............22

PART II.......................................................................23

    Item 5.  Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.........23
    Item 6.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
             and Results of Operations........................................25
    Item 7.  Financial Statements.............................................43
    Item 8.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
             and Financial Disclosure.........................................66
    Item 8A. Controls and Procedures..........................................66
    Item 8B. Other Information................................................65

PART III......................................................................67

    Item 9.  Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons;
             Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act................67
    Item 10. Executive Compensation...........................................67
    Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
             and Related Stockholder Matters..................................67
    Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions...................67
    Item 13. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.................................67
    Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services...........................67


                                      -3-
<PAGE>

                                CAUTIONARY NOTICE

      This Annual Report of VendingData Corporation on Form 10-KSB contains
forward-looking statements in which our management shares its knowledge and
judgment about factors that it believes may materially affect our performance in
the future. Terms expressing future expectations, outlook potential and
anticipated growth in gaming industries and markets, acceptance of our products
and services, estimates on revenues and earnings, and like expressions typically
identify such statements.

      All forward-looking statements, although made in good faith, are subject
to the uncertainties inherent in predicting the future. Such forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important
factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements or
industry results to differ materially from future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such
risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others: our
liquidity requirements, our ability to locate necessary sources of capital to
sustain our operations, adverse rulings or other developments in pending or
future litigation, the continued growth of the gaming industry, the success of
our product development activities, the acceptance of our products in the
marketplace, vigorous competition in the gaming industry, our dependence on
existing management, changes in gaming laws and regulations (including actions
affecting licensing), regulatory and jurisdictional issues involving us or our
products specifically, our leverage and debt service (including sensitivity to
fluctuations in interest rates), domestic or global economic conditions and the
risks and factors described from time to time in the Company's reports filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, but not limited to the
company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and September 30,
2004.

      Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and
readers are warned that we undertake no obligation to update or revise such
statements to reflect new circumstances or unanticipated events as they occur.

      Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the disclosures in this
and other reports that discuss factors relevant to our business. See Part II.
"Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations--Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Information."

                                     PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

      We develop, manufacture, sell and lease products for the gaming industry
that are intended to increase our customers' security, productivity and
profitability. Since inception, we have invested in excess of $40 million to set
up the company and develop our products. Our products are categorized as table
game support products or casino revenue control system products and are as
follows:

      Table Game Support Products

      Our table game support products are:

      o     The Deck Checker(TM), a card security device that scans decks of
            playing cards to ensure an accurate count and verifies that all of
            the cards are present.

      o     The Random Ejection Shuffler(TM), a shuffling device that is capable
            of shuffling between one and eight decks of cards.

      o     The Continuous Random Ejection Shuffler, a shuffling device that
            continuously shuffles and recycles the same group of between one and
            eight decks of cards.

      o     The Random Plus(TM) Shuffler, is the next generation of shufflers
            and is an updated version of the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) and
            the Continuous Random Ejection Shuffler, which will enter the
            domestic market in the second quarter of 2005, will offer additional
            features such as the switch in power from alternating current, or
            AC, to direct current, or DC, conversion to an external power
            supply, redesign of the cabinet, and the addition of an external
            lever to adjust the shuffler for card thickness.


                                      -4-
<PAGE>

      o     The PokerOne(TM) Shuffler, a high-speed card-shuffler designed for
            use with single deck poker variation games.

      The Deck Checker(TM) specifically scans playing cards to ensure an
accurate count and verifies whether all of the cards in a deck of cards are
present. This product confirms the integrity of each card and will reject any
non-conforming cards. The Deck Checker(TM) has multiple uses and can be used in
the back of the house (casino support departments) to reduce labor costs by
expediting the verification process of used cards, or it can be used in the
front of the house (the casino floor) to ensure that all table games open with
complete and accurate decks, reducing the amount of time it takes to open a
table game, thereby increasing productivity. The Deck Checker(TM) can scan from
one deck to up to eight decks at a time, can scan each deck in less than 15
seconds, is programmed for all standard playing cards, accommodates plastic,
paper and plastic coated playing cards and is programmed with many standard card
games.

      The Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) is a batch shuffler that is capable of
shuffling between one and eight decks of cards. The patented technology used in
the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) is designed to produce an independent card
selection in that any card may be ejected from the card tray at any time and
restacked in an unpredictable manner. While most shuffling machines repeat the
same mechanical action, each shuffle in the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) is
random. In the batch mode, the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) can shuffle six
decks of cards in approximately three minutes and, due to the speed of the
shuffler, neutralize card counting.

      In contrast, the Continuous Random Ejection Shuffler continuously recycles
the same group of cards. After each play, the cards are returned to the
shuffler, and a new batch is used for play. The Continuous Random Ejection
Shuffler provides operator security by neutralizing card counters and locaters,
while increasing player satisfaction derived from a hand-held game. The cards
may also be loaded and dealt from a traditional card-dealing shoe.

      In addition to the foregoing, we have developed a new generation of the
Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) and the Continuous Random Ejection Shuffler,
referred to as the RandomPlus(TM) Shuffler, which will include additional
features, such as the switch in power from alternating current, or AC, to direct
current, or DC, conversion to an external power supply, redesign of the cabinet,
and the addition of an external lever to adjust the shuffler for card thickness.
We anticipate conducting field trials of the RandomPlus(TM) Shuffler in North
America by the end of the second quarter of 2005.

      The PokerOne(TM) shuffler is designed for use with single deck poker
variation games. The cycle time with the PokerOne(TM) shuffler is less than ten
seconds. The PokerOne(TM) shuffler uses our patented Random Ejection(TM)
technology to ensure a true, mathematically random shuffle. This technology
restacks the cards in an unpredictable manner in an attempt to negate the
advantages achieved by expert players. As discussed elsewhere herein, our
ability to sell this product in the United States is currently the subject of
litigation.

      Casino Revenue Control System Products--SecureDrop(R) System

      Our casino revenue control system, or the SecureDrop(R) System, enables
gaming operators to more efficiently and securely track paper currency and coins
from the time they are deposited in slot machines or handed to dealers at table
games on the casino floor through the time the paper currency and coins are
delivered to the "count room," the location where all gaming proceeds from table
games, slot machines and various other games are collected and counted by the
casino operator. The products that comprise our SecureDrop(R) System are:


                                      -5-
<PAGE>

      o     The SecureDrop(R) Soft Count Module, a bill (paper currency)
            canister identification system that enables gaming operators to
            electronically track, secure and identify all bill canisters on the
            casino floor and in the count room.

      o     The SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module, a coin (hard currency) bucket
            identification system that enables gaming operators to
            electronically track, secure and identify all slot machine coin
            buckets on the casino floor and in the count room.

      The SecureDrop(R) Soft Count Module enables gaming operators to
electronically track, secure and identify all bill canisters on the casino floor
and in the count room. The SecureDrop(R) time stamp system deters canister
switching, theft and loss by recording all phases of the soft drop process,
accounting for the bill canister's removal from the gaming machine, the time the
bill canister is in transport and the time of the bill canister's arrival in the
casino's soft count room. Through the SecureDrop(R) database system, all bill
canisters can be identified, tracked and accounted for with a high degree of
security.

      The SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module provides a bucket identification
system that enables gaming operators to electronically track and identify all
buckets and slot machines, secure the coins immediately and we believe, in
essence, brings the hard count room to the casino's slot floor. The heart of the
SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module is the electronic bucket featuring the patented
SecureDrop(R) identification technology. The smart bucket works with enhanced
controls inside the slot machine to record the ID number and meter readings of
the slot machine. Specially designed SecureDrop(R) multi-bin coin vaults are
used to secure the coins on the casino's slot floor.

      The SecureDrop(R) time stamp system helps to deter theft and loss by
recording all phases of the drop process. After the buckets are weighed, that
data gathered and the coins secured, the cleared buckets can be returned to any
slot machine. Any coin variance is immediately identified, and steps can be
taken to correct the problem. When used with the SecureDrop(R) mobile command
center, the SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module allows operators to utilize a
single-bucket drop system. Using the comprehensive SecureDrop(R) database
system, all drop buckets can be identified, tracked and accounted for with a
high degree of security.

      Recent Developments

      Private Placements of 10% Senior Secured Convertible Notes

      In February 2005, we conducted a private placement of up to $10,000,000 in
10% senior secured convertible notes due February 2008, or the February Senior
Notes. Through this private placement, on February 15, 2005, we issued an
aggregate of $7,775,000 in February Senior Notes in return for gross cash
proceeds of $4,525,000 and the exchange of previously issued notes in the
aggregate principal amount of $3,250,000. Subsequently upon the satisfaction of
certain closing conditions, we closed on previously committed funds and issued
additional February Senior Notes in the aggregate principal amount of
$2,225,000. In March 2005, we conducted a subsequent private placement of up to
$2,000,000 in 10% senior secured convertible notes due March 2008, or the March
Senior Notes and together with the February Senior Notes, the Senior Notes.
Through these private placements, we issued February Senior Notes in the
aggregate principal amount of $10,000,000 and issued March Senior Notes in the
aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 on a pari passu basis with the February
Senior Notes.

      More detailed information on the private placement of the Senior Notes is
set forth below under Part II - Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters and Part II - Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as in our Current
Reports on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2005 and March 14, 2005, respectively.

      Stay of Preliminary Injunction in Shuffle Master Litigation

      On March 3, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit stayed the preliminary injunction granted by the United States District
Court, District of Nevada (Case No. CV-S-04-1373-JCM-LRL), pending the
disposition of our appeal. The ruling was in response to our appeal to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit of the preliminary
injunction issued by the United States District Court that prohibited us from
selling our PokerOne(TM) shuffler during the pendency of the action brought by
Shuffle Master, Inc. In its order, the Court of Appeals stated that "VendingData
has shown the requisite likelihood of success to obtain a stay of the
injunction, pending appeal" and that "VendingData has shown that in the
circumstances of this case the district court likely erred in entering a
preliminary injunction without providing any analysis of the disputed claim
language."


                                      -6-
<PAGE>

      Appointment to Board of Directors

      On March 11, 2005, we appointed Mark R. Newburg to our board of directors
as an executive director. Mr. Newburg, whose career spans over 30 years, is a
skilled global executive with experience in the gaming industry, as well as in
executive positions in Fortune 100 companies within the computer hardware and
software, telecommunications, and consumer products industries. Previously, Mr.
Newburg acted as a consultant and provided us with detailed independent analysis
of our operational matters.

      Mr. Newburg currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of
VirtGame, a provider of innovative server-based software solutions to the gaming
industry, which as of February 22, 2005, agreed to be acquired by Progressive
Gaming Corporation. Mr. Newburg will maintain his role with VirtGame until the
acquisition is completed. It is expected that this transaction will be closed
during the second quarter of 2005. Prior to VirtGame, Mr. Newburg, served as
President of Aristocrat Technologies, Inc., a designer, builder and marketer of
proprietary software and hardware to the gaming industries in 55 countries
world-wide. He has received licenses in 130 gaming jurisdictions. Mr. Newburg
also spent 21 years with NCR Corporation, with his last position as Vice
President, Asia Pacific and Japan.

      Equipment Lease Financing

      In the fourth quarter of 2004, we entered into five Deck Checker(TM)
equipment leases in the aggregate amount of $810,000 under our existing
$3,000,000 equipment lease credit line arrangement with Central Leasing Co. of
New Jersey. We received $727,500 in cash from these equipment leases. The
equipment leases will be paid back over 36 months at $26,519.40 per month plus
applicable taxes. At the end of the 36 months, we are required to purchase the
equipment for 15% of the original lease amount. The equipment leases are secured
by the underlying equipment.

      Resignation of Steven J. Blad

      On March 25, 2005, the board of directors accepted the resignation of
President and Chief Executive Officer Steven J. Blad. Mr. Blad also yielded his
seat on our board of directors. In his capacity as executive director of our
board of directors, Mr. Newburg will oversee all aspects of our business. Mr.
Blad will continue in a consulting role for a period of time to assist in the
transition.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

      While we transitioned from a development stage to an operating company in
2000, we have continued to develop or acquire new products. The focus on the
development and acquisition of new products is reflected in our operating
results. Our strategy to increase revenue and margins is based on four key
factors:

      o     Development of two product lines with limited competition. Our
            ability to offer the SecureDrop(R) System and the Deck Checker(TM)
            have given us two product lines that our informal industry and
            patent research led us to conclude have limited competition. In
            contrast, our shuffler products face intense competition due
            primarily to the dominance in the installed shuffler market base in
            North America by Shuffle Master, Inc.


                                      -7-
<PAGE>

      o     Expansion into additional domestic gaming markets and into
            international gaming markets for our products. The global economic
            downturn has forced non-gaming jurisdictions to look at new ways to
            raise revenue. Accordingly, from time to time different states and
            foreign countries may consider legalizing various forms of casino
            gaming as an additional revenue source. These include slot machines
            at racetracks, Native American Class-III casinos and Las Vegas-style
            casinos. The worldwide expansion of gaming should provide new
            markets for our products, and we have targeted sales opportunities
            in these new markets in addition to our traditional established
            gaming markets.

      o     Implementation of cost reduction initiatives to increase gross
            margins. Through the implementation of cost reduction initiatives,
            our management believes that the gross margins on our products will
            improve over time. We continue to reduce the cost of our component
            parts through the use of production facilities in China. We opened
            an office, manufacturing, assembly, service and warehouse facility
            in Xiaolan Town in Zhongshan City, China. To date, we have shifted
            the production of over 90% of our products to China.

TABLE GAME SUPPORT PRODUCTS

      Shuffler Product Line

      We currently offer the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM), a batch shuffler, and
the Continuous Random Ejection Shuffler, a continuous shuffler. We began
shipping the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) in the spring of 1999 and have spent
considerable engineering time and resources to improve its speed and
reliability. In the fourth quarter of 2000, we began to ship the Continuous
Random Ejection Shuffler. While we believe that our products have begun to
perform to or above design specifications that will satisfy industry demands, we
are continuing to improve our shufflers. Accordingly, we have developed our
Random Plus(TM) Shuffler, which includes a switch in power from AC to DC, a
conversion to an external power supply, a re-design of the cabinet, and the
addition of an external lever to adjust the shuffler for card thickness. We have
also developed a third shuffler, the PokerOne(TM) Shuffler, to provide shuffles
of pre-dealt hands of cards for specialty poker games. We have begun to install
the PokerOne(TM) Shuffler in foreign markets and expect domestic installations
in the second quarter of 2005.

      We believe that the motivating factors for casino operators to adopt
automatic shufflers on gaming tables include the desire to increase dealer
productivity, reduce exposure to fraud and cheating by dealers, players or both
and reduce reliance on experienced dealers. The ability to turn more hands, or
decisions, per hour and reduce the advantage knowledgeable players have with
respect to poor manual shuffles will more likely generate higher "holds," the
percentage of wagers that the casino earns, from automated shufflers than from
manual shuffles.

      Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) and Continuous Random Ejection Shuffler

      The Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) is a batch shuffler that is capable of
shuffling between one and eight decks of cards. With a slight modification, we
can convert a batch shuffler into the Continuous Random Ejection Shuffler, which
continuously recycles the same group of cards. Upon conversion, the shuffler may
be used as either a batch shuffler or a continuous shuffler. Both shufflers can
accommodate different games of blackjack or baccarat.

      The patented technology used in the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) is
designed to produce an independent card selection in that any card may be
ejected from the card tray at any time and restacked in an unpredictable manner.
As a result, clumps, slugs or memorized sequences are eliminated from shuffles.
We believe that this technology negates advantages achieved by expert players.
While most shuffling machines repeat the same mechanical action, each shuffle in
the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) is random. In the batch mode, the Random
Ejection Shuffler(TM) can shuffle six decks of cards in approximately three
minutes and, due to the speed of the shuffler, neutralize card counting.
Further, through the use of a second batch of cards, the Random Ejection
Shuffler(TM) maintains productivity and reduces downtime due to manual card
shuffling. Through the use of the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM), we believe that
dealer productivity can be increased.


                                      -8-
<PAGE>

      With the Continuous Random Ejection Shuffler, all playing cards remain in
a continuous shuffle, except for a small batch used during play. After play,
this batch is returned to the shuffler, and a new batch is used for play. The
Continuous Random Ejection Shuffler provides operator security by neutralizing
card counters and locaters, while increasing player satisfaction derived from a
hand-held game. The cards may also be loaded and dealt from a traditional
card-dealing shoe.

      We currently offer the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) and the Continuous
Random Ejection Shuffler for sale and rent to properties within the United
States and only for sale to properties in foreign countries.

      RandomPlus(TM) Shuffler

      The RandomPlus(TM) Shuffler is the next generation shuffler in our product
line. It will replace the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM). The RandomPlus(TM)
utilizes state of the art electronics for improved reliability and longevity. It
has been designed with reliability in mind. The RandomPlus(TM) has fewer moving
parts than its predecessor and is designed with additional user accessible
adjustments to accommodate a wider variety of card types and conditions. It will
include additional features, such as the switch in power from alternating
current, or AC, to direct current, or DC, conversion to an external power
supply, redesign of the cabinet, and the addition of an external lever to adjust
the shuffler for card thickness.

      PokerOne(TM) Shuffler

      To complement our current shufflers, we are developing the PokerOne(TM)
Shuffler, a specialty game shuffler utilizing new and existing technology.
Specialty game shufflers are only used in single deck poker variation games such
as Caribbean Stud(TM), Let It Ride(TM), Pai Gow Poker and Three Card Poker. The
PokerOne(TM) Shuffler is designed to re-stack the deck and deliver the required
number of cards (3, 5 or 7 cards) into packets using a batch system method. We
believe that the PokerOne(TM) Shuffler will significantly raise the standard for
specialty game shufflers and will compete with the Ace(R) Shuffler, manufactured
by Shuffle Master, Inc. Currently, the Ace(R) Shuffler is the only specialty
game shuffler on the market that has the capability to shuffle a single deck of
cards and put the cards into individual packets. The Ace(R) Shuffler is also
able to verify the total quantity of cards shuffled and the quantity of cards in
each packet.

      In order to compete with the Ace(R) Shuffler in terms of the capabilities
offered, we have designed the PokerOne(TM) Shuffler to:

      o     shuffle and prepare the cards into the individual packets required
            for the specialty poker game;

      o     provide sufficient speed to maintain the pace of the game even if
            just a single player is playing;

      o     verify the overall quantity of the cards shuffled and the number of
            cards in each packet; and

      o     verify the actual cards dealt to each player.

      The PokerOne(TM) Shuffler is designed for the active specialty table game
market where non-traditional card dealing is accepted. The PokerOne(TM) Shuffler
will shuffle and deal packets of cards to each player. An optional vision module
will be available in the future to record the individual cards that are dealt to
each player and, as a result, allow operators to verify winning hands that
receive large payouts. Since many specialty poker games offer payouts in excess
of $100,000, the value in verifying winning hands is substantial. As a result of
the characteristics of the PokerOne(TM) Shuffler, we believe that we will be
able to provide substantially improved speed and security for our customers in
the specialty table game market. We have begun to install the PokerOne(TM)
Shuffler in foreign markets and expect domestic installations in the second
quarter of 2005. As discussed elsewhere herein, our ability to sell the
PokerOne(TM) Shuffler in the United States is currently the subject of pending
litigation.


                                      -9-
<PAGE>

      Shuffler Market

      We estimate that there are over 41,000 gaming tables worldwide. We believe
that the market penetration of installations of automatic shufflers is low. We
estimate that of the automatic shufflers installed, most of these installations
are on specialty gaming tables. Several companies have introduced automatic
shufflers for the general market, but for the most part, these efforts have been
unsuccessful. Since there is low penetration by our competitors in the general
gaming table market (blackjack and baccarat tables) to date, we believe that
development of a shuffler that overcomes the shortcomings of the current
shufflers in the market will lead to an increase in market penetration.

      There are several factors that have resulted in low acceptance of
automatic shufflers for the general market, including security issues,
reliability/productivity and player confidence. We believe that our technology
and ergonomic design will allow our products to overcome these industry
concerns:

      o     Security. The design of existing shufflers has proven vulnerable to
            cheating and card counting schemes. We believe that our combination
            of patented computer and mechanical technology safeguards against
            cheating schemes. The Random Ejection technology used in all of our
            shuffler products produces a computer-generated, random and
            untrackable shuffle, and the Continuous Random Ejection Shuffler
            eliminates advantages achieved by knowledgeable players, as each
            card is available for the next round of play by producing "full"
            decks of continuously shuffled random cards. This has the added
            benefit of giving the casino a higher hold from the gaming table
            since the shuffler preserves the original odds of each game, which
            favor the casino.

      o     Reliability/Productivity. Given the paper handling demands placed on
            card shufflers, shufflers are prone to jamming and breakdown. We
            have designed our shufflers to be easily accessed by dealers so they
            can hand-deal cards until the unit can be put back in service and
            prevent a table from shutting down. In addition, the dealer, with
            little interruption, can easily put the unit back into play in most
            cases.

      o     Player Confidence. To reduce cheating schemes, many existing
            shufflers completely cover or shield from players the deck(s) being
            shuffled, thereby reducing player confidence in a fair game. The
            design of our shufflers allows players to see the cards being
            ejected and re-stacked through a frosted cover without compromising
            security, which we believe will gain better player acceptance.

      Shuffler Installations

      As of December 31, 2004, we had installed a net total of 770 units,
representing the number of revenue generating shufflers installed at casinos
through sale or rental agreements. Of the units installed as of December 31,
2004, 150 units were installed pursuant to rental agreements, and 620 units were
sales. In terms of location, as of December 31, 2004, we have installed our
shuffler in 96 different gaming properties, including the MGM Grand in Detroit,
Michigan; the Excalibur, the Luxor and the Venetian in Las Vegas, Nevada; the
Viejas Casino in Alpine, California; the Silver Dollar in Tacoma, Washington;
and the Treasure Island Resort & Casino in Red Wing, Minnesota.

      Competition - Shufflers

      Competition in the shuffler market is intense. The shuffler market is
divided into two separate segments, traditional table game and specialty table
games. Shuffle Master, Inc. is the current market leader in both the traditional
table game and specialty table game markets and that our other competitors have
a small collective market share of the table game market. With respect to the
traditional table game market segment, we compete with Shuffle Master, Inc.,
which markets the Shuffle Master King(TM) and the One2Six Shuffler(TM) and Ten
Stix, Inc., a U.S. company that markets the Pro Shuffler Shuffling System.
Shuffle Master, Inc. offers the ACE(R), which is currently the only product in
the specialty table game market.


                                      -10-
<PAGE>

      We believe our shufflers have a competitive advantage over other shufflers
with respect to vulnerability to player cheating and card counting, reliability,
and player satisfaction. The advantage of our Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) is
that it produces an independent card selection in that any card may be ejected
from the card tray at any time and restacked in an unpredictable manner, which
eliminates clumps, slugs or memorized sequences from shuffles. We believe that
the technology used in the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) and subsequently in the
RandomPlus(TM) Shuffler negates advantages achieved by expert players. Because
the Continuous Random Ejection Shuffler is continuously recycling the cards,
this product provides casino operators heightened security by neutralizing card
counters and locaters, while increasing player satisfaction derived from a
hand-held game.

      The Deck Checker(TM)

      The Deck Checker(TM) is a card security device that specifically scans
playing cards to ensure an accurate count and verify that all of the cards in a
deck of cards are present. This innovative product confirms the integrity of
each card and will reject any non-conforming cards. The Deck Checker(TM) has
multiple uses and can be used in the back of the house (casino support
departments) to reduce labor costs by expediting the verification process of
used cards, or it can be used in the front of the house (the casino floor) to
ensure that all table games open with complete and accurate decks, reducing the
amount of time it takes to open a table game, thereby increasing productivity.
The Deck Checker(TM) allows the re-use of playing cards by providing a secure
and reliable method of putting used cards back into play, reducing card usage
and the associated costs. In addition, the Deck Checker(TM) can scan from one
deck to up to eight decks at a time, can scan each deck in less than 15 seconds,
is programmed for all standard playing cards, accommodates plastic, paper and
plastic coated playing cards and is programmed with many standard card games.

      The Deck Checker(TM) has an integrated management system and an on-board
storage/vault system. The integrated management system gives a report for every
transaction to provide an audit trail. Further, the Deck Checker(TM) requires
limited training time, as the machine prompts the user throughout the entire
checking process. Since the Deck Checker(TM) does not require additional staff,
the Deck Checker(TM) is designed to increase efficiency and shorten the
start-of-the-day and the end-of-the-day procedures.

      Market and Distribution of the Deck Checker(TM)

      Our management estimates that the potential market for the Deck
Checker(TM) to be one machine for every ten table games, or approximately 4,000
machines installed at various casinos around the world. In November 2002, we
entered into a five-year agreement with TCS Aces, an Australian subsidiary of
Technical Casino Services, Ltd., a United Kingdom company that distributes
gaming equipment worldwide, under which the Deck Checker(TM) will be distributed
internationally. As of December 31, 2004, we had 316 units of the Deck
Checker(TM) installed at 63 casinos, 297 of which were purchased and 19 of which
were rented.

      Competition - Deck Checker(TM)

      We believe Shuffle Master, Inc.'s MD2 product provides limited competition
for the Deck Checker(TM). We have been issued one patent each in the United
States and South Africa and have five patent applications pending in the United
States, Australia, Canada, China and Europe.


                                      -11-
<PAGE>

CASINO REVENUE CONTROL SYSTEM PRODUCTS

      SecureDrop(R) System

      We launched our initial versions of the elements of the SecureDrop(R) Hard
Count Module in September 1999. The Hard Count Module was designed to provide
casino operators with time and labor savings, enhanced security and
accountability in the slot machine coin collection process. We subsequently
adapted the SecureDrop(R) System and created the Soft Count Module to apply to
the paper currency collection process as well. The coin collection process and
the paper currency collection process are referred to as the hard drop and soft
drop, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, we have units installed to support
24,593 slot machines of the Hard Count Module at 30 properties and units to
support 12,721 slot machines of the Soft Count Module at 8 properties.

      The SecureDrop(R) System provides gaming operators with a reliable method
of tracking the currency and coin containers from the time currency and coin are
removed from the gaming machine or table game to the time they arrive in the
casino's count room. The SecureDrop(R) identification and time stamp technology
replaces the existing manual methods still used throughout the gaming industry.
The SecureDrop(R) products are compatible with existing casino systems,
including operators with or without online slot accounting systems. The
technology utilizes specially designed bill canisters, drop buckets and drop
boxes that house a memory chip that works in conjunction with a sensor base
beneath the gaming machine that is mounted in the bill accepter or beneath the
gaming table. The electronic chip system automatically links the canister to the
relevant gaming machine or gaming table, or the drop box to the relevant table
game, and transfers the data for electronic processing. Using a specially
designed SecureDrop(R) mobile command center with a built in data-recording
device, all of the relevant information is captured from the memory chip.

      The SecureDrop(R) System control software provides a complete tracking and
control system for all slot and table game revenue containers on the gaming
floor. The SecureDrop(R) System control software is responsible for running all
of our SecureDrop(R) System modules. The SecureDrop(R) System control software
is designed to create a secure environment and maintains all databases and time
clocks throughout the system. Every function can be password protected, and each
user can have a completely customized profile for system access.

      We believe that in the domestic United States market, the greater emphasis
of sales will be the SecureDrop(R) Soft Count Module due to the growth of
coinless slot machines. In international markets, we intend to focus on our
SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module in the initial time period until we gauge the
demand for the Soft Count Module overseas.

      SecureDrop(R) Soft Count Module

      The SecureDrop(R) Soft Count Module provides a bill (paper currency)
canister identification system that enables gaming operators to electronically
track, secure and identify all bill canisters on the casino floor and in the
count room. The SecureDrop(R) time stamp system deters canister switching, theft
and loss by recording all phases of the soft drop process, accounting for the
bill canister's removal from the gaming machine, the time the bill canister is
in transport and the time of the bill canister's arrival in the casino's soft
count room. Through the comprehensive SecureDrop(R) database system, all bill
canisters can be identified, tracked and accounted for with a high degree of
security.

      With the SecureDrop(R) Soft Count Module, canister security is enhanced,
canister movement is accounted for, soft count accuracy is improved, and
deterrence against theft is added to the soft count process by creating a
complete history of each canister's movement from the gaming machine to the
casino's soft count room. Because our Soft Count Module generates a missing
canister report before the funds in the soft count room are audited, casinos
should know much earlier if there is a missing canister, which allows the casino
personnel to immediately implement its procedures to locate the missing
canister. By locating the missing canisters more quickly, the casino should
reduce its variances, which are the amount of paper currency in the machines in
relation to the amount of funds that should be in the gaming machines according
to the records of the casino's accounting system.


                                      -12-
<PAGE>

      SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module

      The SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module provides a bucket identification
system that enables gaming operators to electronically track and identify all
buckets and slot machines, secure the coins immediately and we believe, in
essence, brings the hard count room to the casino's slot floor. The heart of the
SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module is the electronic bucket featuring the patented
SecureDrop(R) identification technology. The smart bucket works with enhanced
controls inside the slot machine to record the ID number and meter readings of
the slot machine. Specially designed SecureDrop(R) multi-bin coin vaults are
used to secure the coins on the casino's slot floor.

      The SecureDrop(R) time stamp system helps to deter theft and loss by
recording all phases of the drop process. After the buckets are weighed, that
data gathered and the coins secured, the cleared buckets can be returned to any
slot machine. Any coin variance is immediately identified, and steps can be
taken to correct the problem. When used with the SecureDrop(R) mobile command
center, the SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module allows operators to utilize a
single-bucket drop system. Using the comprehensive SecureDrop(R) database
system, all drop buckets can be identified, tracked and accounted for with a
high degree of security.

      With the SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module, once the coins are gathered, the
only remaining task to complete in the casino's hard count room is to wrap, bag
and rack the coin. The SecureDrop(R) conveyor belt system helps automate and
streamline this process. With the SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module, security is
enhanced, and hard count accuracy is improved.

      Market for the SecureDrop(R) System

      The world gaming machine market is complex and segmented based on
different machines in terms of technology, winnings, payout, range of bets and
losses and regulatory environments. Our management believes that the current
market for elements of the SecureDrop(R) System encompasses all casinos, gaming
halls or other venues that feature 100 or more coin and/or paper money based
gaming machines. We believe the primary market for this product is in the
international market.

      Competition - SecureDrop(R) System

      We believe that in emerging growth countries the SecureDrop(R) Hard Count
Module is the only method of computerized bucket management and one-step
processing of coins and bills on the casino floor. We believe that the
SecureDrop(R) Soft Count Module has only one competitor, JCM American
Corporation.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

      Our research and development operations were moved to our China facilities
at the end of 2004. We anticipate that the development and production of our
products will be more efficient as a result of this consolidation. Our current
research and development emphasis is to improve our existing product lines, as
demonstrated by our completion of the PokerOne(TM) Shuffler, and development of
the next generation of the Random Ejection Shuffler(TM) and the Continuous
Random Ejection Shuffler, the RandomPlus(TM) Shuffler. We expect our research
and development expenses to increase as we develop a new shuffler, the
RandomPlus(TM) Shuffler, for release in 2005.


                                      -13-
<PAGE>

REGULATION AND LICENSING

      Overview

      We are subject to regulation by governmental authorities in most
jurisdictions in which our products are sold or used by persons or entities
licensed to conduct gaming activities. Gaming regulatory requirements vary from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and obtaining licenses, findings of suitability,
registrations and/or other required approvals with respect to us, our personnel
and our products are time-consuming and expensive.

      Generally, gaming regulatory authorities have broad discretionary powers
and may deny applications for or revoke approvals on any basis they deem
reasonable. Although our experience is excellent, we may be unable to obtain or
maintain necessary gaming regulatory approvals for us, our products or our
personnel.

      We have approvals that enable us to conduct our business in numerous
jurisdictions, subject in each case to the conditions of the particular
approvals. These conditions may include limitations as to the type of product we
may sell or lease, as well as limitations on the type of facility (such as
riverboats) and the territory within which we may operate (such as tribal
nations). Jurisdictions in which we, and specific personnel where required) have
authorizations with respect to some or all of our products and activities
including Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North
Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Washington, various Native American tribes, as
well as Argentina, Bahamas, Peru, Puerto Rico, Russia, Saskatchewan, Sweden and
Vietnam.

      Certain Indian tribes throughout the United States that have compacts with
the states in which their tribal dominions are located, operate or propose to
operate casinos, and these tribes may require suppliers of gaming and
gaming-related equipment to obtain authorizations. We have worked and will
continue to work with these tribes to obtain the necessary authorizations.

      During 2005, we anticipate cooperating with certain state gaming
authorities with respect to the required relicensing of our company in certain
jurisdictions, as well as the licensing of our new management team. We do not
currently anticipate that this process will have a material adverse effect on
us. We continue to cooperate with all gaming regulatory agencies as necessary
and applicable to maintain good standing in all jurisdictions in which we hold a
license.

      Associated Equipment

      All of our current products fall within the general classification of
"associated equipment." "Associated equipment" is equipment that is not
classified as a "gaming device," but which has an integral relationship to the
conduct of licensed gaming. Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions have
discretion to require manufacturers and distributors to meet licensing or
suitability requirements prior to or concurrently with the use of associated
equipment. In other jurisdictions, the regulatory authorities must approve
associated equipment in advance of its use at licensed locations. Except as
described below, we have obtained approval for our associated equipment in each
jurisdiction that requires such approval and in which our products that are
classified as associated equipment are sold or used.

      Gaming Devices and Equipment

      Certain jurisdictions classify our products as "gaming devices" and/or
"gaming equipment". Although regulations vary among jurisdictions, each
jurisdiction requires various licenses, findings of suitability, registrations,
approvals or permits to be held by companies and their key personnel in
connection with the manufacture and distribution of gaming devices and
equipment.


                                      -14-
<PAGE>

      Regulation of Stockholders

      In most jurisdictions, any beneficial owner of our voting securities or
other securities may, at the discretion of the gaming regulatory authorities, be
required to file an application for a license, finding of suitability or other
approval and in the process subject himself or herself to an investigation by
those authorities. However, it is rare that any gaming regulatory authority take
such action unless a beneficial owner owns more than 5% of our outstanding
voting securities, at which time most jurisdictions require certain reports to
be filed.

      Regulation and licensing - Nevada

      The manufacture and distribution of associated equipment for use in Nevada
are subject to the Nevada Gaming Control Act and the regulations promulgated
there under and various local ordinances and regulations. These activities are
subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the Nevada Gaming Commission,
the Nevada Gaming Control Board and various local, city and county regulatory
agencies, which we collectively refer to as the Nevada Gaming Authorities.

      The laws, regulations and supervisory practices of the Nevada Gaming
Authorities are based upon the following declarations of public policy:

      o     Preventing any involvement, direct or indirect, of any unsavory or
            unsuitable persons in gaming or in the manufacture or distribution
            of gaming devices at any time or in any capacity;

      o     Strictly regulating all persons, locations, practices and activities
            related to the operation of licensed gaming establishments and the
            manufacture or distribution of gaming devices and equipment;

      o     Establishing and maintaining responsible accounting practices and
            procedures;

      o     Maintaining effective controls over the financial practices of
            licensees (including requirements covering minimum procedures for
            internal fiscal controls and safeguarding assets and revenues,
            reliable record keeping and periodic reports to be filed with Nevada
            Gaming Authorities);

      o     Preventing cheating and fraudulent practices; and

      o     Providing and monitoring sources of state and local revenue based on
            taxation and licensing fees.

      Any changes in these laws, regulations and procedures, depending upon
their nature, could have an adverse effect on our operations.

      We are not required to register as a publicly traded corporation with the
Nevada Gaming Control Board because we do not fall within the definition of a
manufacturer of a gaming device. However, we are currently required to provide a
copy of all periodic reports and other filings we make with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or the SEC, to the Nevada Gaming Control Board. We do not
believe that we will be required by the Nevada Gaming Authorities to register
since we do not presently manufacture or sell "gaming devices" as defined by the
Nevada Gaming Control Act. Further, even though applications for the approval of
associated equipment are subject to a less comprehensive approval process, the
Nevada Gaming Control Board may investigate any individual who has a material
relationship to, or material involvement with, us in order to determine whether
such individual is suitable or should be licensed as a business associate of
ours. Our officers, directors and certain key employees may be required to be
licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The Nevada Gaming
Authorities may deny an application for licensing for any cause that they deem
reasonable. A finding of suitability is comparable to licensing. Both require
submission of detailed personal and financial information, which is followed by
a thorough investigation. The applicant for licensing or a finding of
suitability must pay all costs of the investigation.


                                      -15-
<PAGE>

      In the event that the Nevada Gaming Authorities were to find an officer,
director or key employee unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue
having a relationship with us, we would have to sever all relationships with
that individual. In addition, the Nevada Gaming Commission may require us to
terminate the employment of any person who refuses to file appropriate
applications. Determinations of suitability or of questions pertaining to
licensing are not subject to judicial review in Nevada.

      In the event that we are found to have violated the Nevada Gaming Control
Act, the licenses and/or approvals we hold could be limited, conditioned,
suspended or revoked. In addition, we and the persons involved could be required
to pay substantial fines, at the discretion of the Nevada Gaming Control Board,
for each separate violation of the Nevada Gaming Control Act. The limitation,
conditioning or suspension of any license or approval held by us could (and
revocation of any license or approval would) materially adversely affect our
operations.

      Any beneficial holder of our voting securities, regardless of the number
of shares owned, may be required to file an application, be investigated, and
have the holder's suitability as a beneficial holder of our voting securities
determined if the Nevada Gaming Control Board finds reason to believe that such
ownership would otherwise be inconsistent with the declared policies of the
State of Nevada. However, such action by the Nevada Gaming Control Board is
rare. The applicant must pay all costs of investigation incurred by the Nevada
Gaming Authorities in conducting any such investigation. Any person who fails or
refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within thirty days
after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Gaming Commission or the Chairman of
the Nevada Gaming Control Board may be found unsuitable. The same restrictions
apply to a record owner if the record owner, after request, fails to identify
the beneficial owner. In the event that an individual is found to be unsuitable,
that individual would be required to transfer or otherwise dispose of all of our
stock on such terms as may be required by the applicable Nevada Gaming
Authority.

      Although we believe that we are not currently required to be licensed by
the Nevada Gaming Authorities, other states in which we conduct operations have
similar regulatory requirements and statutory schemes with respect to licensing
of us and of our key individuals. The manufacture and distribution of gaming
devices and of associated equipment is heavily regulated within the United
States, and each jurisdiction in which we conduct business may subject us and
our key individuals to licensing requirements similar to those imposed in
Nevada. Our products require different levels of review in each jurisdiction in
which we do business, depending on how our products are classified by the
applicable gaming authorities in that jurisdiction, and any change in
classification of our products by the applicable gaming authorities could cause
us to apply for additional, or initial, licenses of us and of our key
individuals in that jurisdiction. Any change in classification of our products
by the applicable gaming authorities would have a material effect on our
licensing requirements in that jurisdiction and could have a material effect on
our ability to continue to do business in that jurisdiction. In addition, the
limitation, conditioning or suspension of any license, approval, or waiver of
approval held by us in any of these jurisdictions could (and revocation or
denial of any license, approval or waiver of approval would) materially
adversely effect our operations and may have a material effect in other
jurisdictions in which we previously have obtained licensing, approval, or
waivers of approval, as the case may be.

      Other Jurisdictions

      All other jurisdictions that have legalized gaming require various
licenses, registrations, findings of suitability, permits and approvals for
manufacturers and distributors of gaming devices and equipment as well as
licensure provisions related to changes in control. In general, such
requirements involve restrictions similar to those of Nevada. During the past
year, certain events in connection with our regulatory approvals have taken
place as follows:


                                      -16-
<PAGE>

      Mississippi. We have re-submitted our applications in Mississippi, and our
application investigation is pending. Until this application is acted upon, we
may not currently sell or service our products in Mississippi.

      New Jersey. We have submitted an application for licensure in New Jersey.
Upon a satisfactory initial background investigation, we may obtain
transactional waiver approval from the New Jersey Commission to engage in
specific transactions with New Jersey casinos pending the outcome of the
complete investigation of our license application. The transactional approval
process permits us to continue our business with New Jersey casinos
uninterrupted upon the completion of the investigation.

      Wisconsin. In November 2004, we withdrew our pending applications in
Wisconsin in lieu of a denial. This action was taken due to certain omissions
contained in the original applications submitted primarily in connection with a
former senior executive. Our new management team is evaluating whether we will
file new applications in Wisconsin.

      Louisiana. The Louisiana State Police, Gaming Division, has given us a
permit as a gaming manufacturer, gaming supplier and non-gaming supplier with
respect to all gaming except for Indian gaming. The Louisiana is in the process
of investigating us with respect to certain omissions in our gaming application
relating to certain officers and directors. No formal action has been taken by
Louisiana regarding this investigation.

      Rincon Tribal Gaming Commission, California. The Rincon Tribal Gaming
Commission denied our application in February 2005, primarily due to certain
omissions contained in applications filed by a former senior executive officer.
Our new management team is evaluating whether to file new applications with this
jurisdiction.

      United States - Federal

      The Federal Gambling Devices Act of 1962 makes it unlawful for a person to
manufacture, transport, deliver or receive gaming machines, gaming machine type
devices and components thereof across interstate lines unless that person has
first registered with the Attorney General of the Department of Justice of the
United States. We register annually with the Department of Justice in accordance
with the Federal Gambling Devices Act of 1962.

      Application of Future or Additional Regulatory Requirements

      In the future, we intend to seek the necessary licenses, approvals and
findings of suitability for us, our products and our personnel in other
jurisdictions throughout the United States and the world where significant sales
are anticipated. However, there can be no assurance that such licenses,
approvals or findings of suitability will be obtained, and if obtained that they
will not be revoked, suspended or conditioned or that we will be able to obtain
the necessary approvals in a timely manner, or at all, for our future products
as they are developed. If a license, approval or finding of suitability is
required by a regulatory authority and we fail to seek or do not receive the
necessary license, approval or finding of suitability, we may be prohibited from
selling our products for use in the respective jurisdiction or may be required
to sell our products through other licensed entities at a reduced profit.

CUSTOMER SERVICE

      In order to maintain and expand the market presence of our products, we
are committed to providing a high level of customer service and support. We have
centralized all of our service functions to Las Vegas, Nevada for the purposes
of ensuring uniform repair of our products. As such, all major technical
maintenance on our products is conducted by our local technicians. In this
regard, we have provided our customers with additional back-up products for use
until we can return the serviced products to them.


                                      -17-
<PAGE>

      With respect to routine maintenance, we employ three customer service
representatives, three service center managers and one technician (in addition
to the nine technicians located in Las Vegas) in various locations in the United
States. Our service representatives regularly visit our customers to ensure our
products are operating satisfactorily. In the event that a customer service
representative discovers a problem with one of our products, our representative
will alert the customer that the equipment needs to be shipped to Las Vegas for
repair. Our service representatives also assist our customers in training
dealers and other casino employees how to use our products.

      Our standard warranty period is 90 days for our products. If a problem
arises during the warranty period, we will fix the product at no cost, however;
it is the customer's responsibility to ship the product to us. Certain
components that we use to manufacture our products are acquired from third
parties, and may contain a longer warranty period. For example, the warranty
period on all memory chips is ten years.

      In addition, as explained more fully below, we maintain a training center
in Las Vegas to provide support and training to our distributors, who are
responsible for servicing their own products.

MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION

      As the gaming industry becomes increasingly more competitive, our strategy
is to develop cost-effective niche products and services that increase the
security, productivity and profitability for the global gaming industry. As part
of our strategy, we offer to lease or sell our products to casinos and other
lawful gaming establishments. In addition, we permit casinos and other
purchasers to purchase shufflers through installment sales, whereby purchasers
pay a fixed monthly payment for a certain number of months.

      We have a professional sales team of five full-time employees with
extensive gaming industry experience. We believe that the most effective sales
tactic is to show the potential customer a live demonstration of our products.
As such, when a member of our sales team approaches a potential new customer,
the sales representative typically brings one of our mobile showrooms that
contain our complete line of products. Our marketing department supports the
sales effort through direct mail advertising and presentations at international
trade shows.

      We sell and lease our products directly to gaming operators and indirectly
through distributors. In general, except as described below, we depend on
distributors to sell our products internationally and on our sales team to sell
our products domestically. Our distributors receive compensation through our
volume discount pricing structure, which allows them to sell the products to
their customers at market driven prices. In fiscal year 2004, our direct sales
accounted for 65% of our revenue and distributor-based sales accounted for 35%.

      We use distributors to gain exposure of our products in certain geographic
areas where we believe distributors with a local presence would be more
effective than our own sales force. Management believes that utilizing
distributors to sell our products internationally has two main advantages:

      o     Distributors have the authority to operate in the respective market
            and are able to address and resolve regulatory compliance issues
            that may arise in a timely manner; and

      o     Distributors have the internal infrastructure and superior contacts
            necessary to effectively sell our products in certain markets.

      On January 21, 2005, we entered into an exclusive five-year agreement with
TCS JohnHuxley, or TCS, a U.K. based worldwide distributor of products to the
gaming industry, to market and distribute our shuffler products outside of the
United States.


                                      -18-
<PAGE>

CUSTOMERS

      Our customers are domestic and international casino and gaming operators.
Any adverse changes in the financial condition of our major customers, any loss
of our major customers, or any meaningful reduction in the level of sales to any
of these customers could have a materially adverse impact on us.

COMPETITION

      The gaming industry is extremely competitive. Although we have assembled
an experienced marketing team, which uses its knowledge of the gaming industry
to tailor our products and services to the needs of the gaming industry, we
compete with many established companies, which possess resources substantially
greater than ours. Generally, we compete with other companies that are
substantially larger, have more substantial histories, backgrounds, experience
and records of successful operations; greater financial, technical, marketing
and other resources; more employees and more extensive facilities than we now
have, or will have in the foreseeable future. The competitive pressures of the
gaming industry will require us to invest in additional research and
development. The constant need to update and innovate may result in increased
costs for and reduced margins on our products and services.

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLY

      At our principal offices, we maintain a state-of-the-art facility for our
product development, service and final assembly divisions. We have three
full-time employees working in research and development of our shufflers, and
enhancements to our SecureDrop(R) product line. We have 20 full-time personnel
in final assembly, installation and service. We hire contract personnel on a
varied basis depending upon production and installation volume. In addition, we
occasionally engage consultants under certain circumstances to purchase
components for, manufacture or package our products. To facilitate development
and assure quality control, we maintain three dedicated laboratory facilities.
Within these labs, we continue to develop additional features to the
SecureDrop(R) System, conduct real-time testing for our shufflers, and test the
Deck Checker(TM). We also prepare quality assurance analyses and internal
product trials at these labs, although the service and refurbishment center for
our shufflers is also located on the premises of our principal offices in Las
Vegas and a refurbishment center is located in China.

SUPPLIERS

      Most components for the SecureDrop(R) System and our shuffler line are
manufactured in facilities in Xiaolan Town in Zhongshan City, China, and shipped
to our Las Vegas, Nevada, facilities or directly to distributors. Despite these
transportation costs, we believe that having the products manufactured in China
is much more cost effective than having them manufactured in the United States.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

      We have secured, and endeavor to secure, to the extent possible, exclusive
rights in our products, primarily through federal and foreign intellectual
property rights, such as patents, copyrights and trademarks. We have applied for
various other patents with respect to other concepts and products, including
potential non-gaming application of our technology. We believe that our
intellectual property is critical to our future profitability and growth.

      With respect to the SecureDrop(R) System, the United States Patent and
Trademark Office has issued six patents, Patent Nos. 5,875,879, 6,213,277,
6,328,149, 6,336,544, 6,675,067 and 6,845,905. These patents expire on dates
between March 2017 and September 2021. In addition, there is one patent
application on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office relating
to the SecureDrop(R) System. On June 26, 2001, we purchased from Technology
Development Center, LLC, the worldwide right, title and interest to the patents,
pending patent applications and all patent rights to the "Coin Operated Machine
Having An Electronically Identified Coin Collection Box" and the "Coin Operated
Machine Including a Coin Box Having a Memory Device." These intellectual
property rights relate to the technology utilized in our SecureDrop(R) product
line.


                                      -19-
<PAGE>

      With respect to our shufflers, the United States Patent and Trademark
Office has issued seven patents, Patent Nos. 5,584,483, 5,676,372, 6,019,368,
6,293,546, 6,299,167, 6,698,756 and 6,719,288, in addition to two design
patents, Patent Nos. D488,193 and D490,481. These patents expire on dates
between April 2014 and April 2024. In addition, there are seven patent
applications on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Our
shufflers have also been issued two patents in Australia and one patent in
Canada. For additional information with respect to the ongoing litigation
involving Shuffle Master, Inc., see "Item 3. Legal Proceedings."

      With respect to the Deck Checker(TM), we acquired the rights to the Deck
Checker(TM) pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement dated December 23, 2002 in
which we purchased all of the tangible and intangible assets related to the Deck
Checker(TM). The purchase price was $1,009,800, where $504,900 was payable upon
the successful production of five fully operational units of the Deck
Checker(TM) and $500,000 was payable within six months after the first payment
is due. The first payment in the amount of $504,900 was made on August 1, 2003
and the final $500,000 payment was made in February 2004. In addition to the
purchase of these assets, we purchased tooling, inventory and spare parts for
$44,800. In exchange for the payments, the seller has agreed to transfer all of
the tangible and intangible assets related to the Deck Checker(TM) and not to
compete with us for 60 months.

      There can be no assurance that any of the claims contained in our pending
United States or foreign patent or trademark applications will be issued, that
any of these rights will not be infringed by others or that already issued
patents or trademark registrations will not be invalidated or canceled. Third
parties could infringe on our rights or successfully duplicate our products
without infringing on our legal rights. Many elements incorporated in our
proprietary products are in the public domain or otherwise not amenable to legal
protection, and the steps taken by us will not, in and of themselves, preclude
competition with our proprietary products.

EMPLOYEES

      As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately 43 full-time employees in
the United States and 73 full-time employees in China. None of our employees are
represented by a labor union, and we consider our relationships with our
employees to be satisfactory. All U.S employees have signed confidentiality
agreements, which prohibit them from disclosing any of our confidential
information at any time during or after their employment with us. We are in the
process of executing confidentiality and non-competition agreements with all key
China personnel.

      We maintain our principal offices at 6830 Spencer Street, Las Vegas,
Nevada 89119. Our telephone number and facsimile number are (702) 733-7195 and
(702) 733-7197, respectively.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

      We lease approximately 58,725 square feet for our headquarters at 6830
Spencer Street, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119, which houses our corporate offices,
including sales and engineering departments, and warehouse space. The current
lease requires payments of approximately $55,254 per month and expires in
October 2006. We have an option for an additional term of five years.

      The lease for the Tukwila, Washington service center is for approximately
1,500 square feet, requires monthly lease payments of $1,378 and expires in
November 2006. The lease for the Gulfport, Mississippi service center is for
approximately 1,500 square feet, requires monthly lease payments of $725 and
ended in August 2004. We are continuing to lease the property in Mississippi on
a month-to-month basis under the same terms. The lease for the Berkley, Michigan
service center is for approximately 1,150 square feet, requires monthly lease
payments of $961 and ends in March 2005. We also lease a three bedroom apartment
from Camden Commons in Las Vegas for use by technicians traveling from China to
Las Vegas and technical trainees. The monthly rent is $999 and the lease will
expire in December 2005.


                                      -20-
<PAGE>

      We have leased office, manufacturing and warehouse space in Xiaolan Town
in Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province in China to meet our manufacturing
requirements. The facilities consist of over 10,000 square feet. The monthly
lease payments are an aggregate of approximately $2,900 per month, and the
leases end between April and October 2008. These facilities were opened between
April 2003 and August 2004. We have also leased a corporate house and apartment
for the use of management that travel to the China facility. The lease payments
began in November 2003 and are currently at approximately $1,200 per month. The
lease payments end in November 2008.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

      On March 27, 2002, Shuffle Master, Inc., or Shuffle Master, filed a
complaint (Case No. CV-S-02-0438-JCM-PAL) against VendingData in the United
States District Court, District of Nevada. The amended complaint alleges, among
other things, claims for patent infringement and requests treble damages, an
injunction enjoining us from infringing on two of Shuffle Master's patents, an
accounting of our gains and profits that resulted from the alleged infringement,
and for interest, costs and attorneys' fees. The Shuffle Master patents that are
at issue in the litigation concern registering use of a playing card shuffler
apparatus and the displaying of the use on a display. We have filed our answer,
counterclaims, and amended counterclaims against Shuffle Master. In the answer,
we deny Shuffle Master's allegation of patent infringement and request that
Shuffle Master's complaint be dismissed. We also seek, in our amended
counterclaim, a declaration that we do not infringe Shuffle Master's patents and
that Shuffle Master's patents and certain of its related claims are invalid. We
further assert counterclaims against Shuffle Master for breach of contract and
violation of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. On May 20, 2002, the United States
District Court, District of Nevada denied Shuffle Master's motion for
preliminary injunction against us. Discovery in this litigation is now closed.
On May 28, 2003, we filed a motion for summary judgment. The hearing on this
motion for summary judgment was taken off calendar pending a ruling from the
Court regarding claim construction to determine the scope and definition of the
patent claims at issue. On March 31, 2004, the Magistrate Judge issued an order
with regard to claim interpretation, to which we have filed written objections.
On June 25, 2004, the District Court affirmed the Magistrate Judge's order. On
August 24, 2004, we renewed our motion for summary judgment to invalidate
Shuffle Master's patents, United States Patent Nos. 6,325,373 ("`373") and
6,068,258 ("`258"), which cover card moving mechanisms that regulate use of the
shuffler apparatus. On October 14, 2004, the District Court issued an order
denying the motion for summary judgment for failure to submit admissible
evidence in support of the motion for summary judgment. We filed a motion for
clarification and reconsideration of the Court's order on November 5, 2004 in
order to have the underlying merits of our motion for summary judgment
considered. No decision has yet been reached on this motion. The Court has
scheduled a mandatory settlement conference for April 13, 2005. The trial is set
for May 23, 2005.


                                      -21-
<PAGE>

      On October 5, 2004, Shuffle Master filed another patent infringement
action against us in the United States District Court, District of Nevada (Case
No. CV-S-04-1373-JCM-LRL). Shuffle Master alleges that the use, importation and
offering for sale of the PokerOne(TM) shuffler infringes Shuffle Master's United
States Patent No. 6,655,684. On October 25, 2004, we filed our answer and
counterclaim that denies Shuffle Master's allegations of patent infringement and
requests that the Court enter a declaratory judgment of non-infringement. On
October 14, 2004 Shuffle Master filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction
seeking to enjoin us from selling the PokerOne(TM) shuffler in the United States
during the pendency of its second lawsuit. The United States District Court,
District of Nevada, granted the Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by
Shuffle Master, Inc. to the extent that the PokerOne(TM) Shuffler deals pre-set
hands of playing cards in the United States. On March 3, 2005, the Court of
Appeals stayed the preliminary injunction granted by the United States District
Court pending the disposition of our appeal. In its order, the Court of Appeals
stated that "VendingData has shown the requisite likelihood of success to obtain
a stay of the injunction, pending appeal" and that "VendingData has shown that
in the circumstances of this case the district court likely erred in entering a
preliminary injunction without providing any analysis of the disputed claim
language." A Markman hearing is scheduled for May 16, 2005.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

      Not applicable.


                                      -22-
<PAGE>

                                     PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

      Our authorized capital stock consists of 25,000,000 shares of common
stock, $0.001 par value, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par
value. Our common stock and preferred stock may be issued from time to time
without action by the stockholders and may be issued for such consideration as
may be fixed from time to time by our board. As of February 28, 2005, we had
outstanding 17,199,558 shares of common stock, held by approximately 312
stockholders of record. We have not issued any shares of our preferred stock.

      Due to the shares outstanding and shares reserved as of February 28, 2005,
we do not have a sufficient number of authorized shares remaining to cover the
shares issuable upon the conversion of the March Senior Notes, if at all.
Accordingly, our board of directors has already authorized an amendment to our
articles of incorporation so as to increase our total authorized number of
shares. We intend to include the matter on the agenda for the 2005 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders so our stockholder may approve the amendment to our
articles of incorporation.

      Market Information

      Until September 10, 2003, there was no public market for our common stock.
Our common stock became eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board on
September 10, 2003. On May 4, 2004, our common stock became eligible for trading
on the American Stock Exchange, or AMEX, and it has traded on the AMEX since
that date.

      The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale price of our
common stock, as reported by the AMEX for the quarters since May 4, 2004.

      CALENDAR QUARTER ENDED                 LOW                    HIGH
      ----------------------               -------                 -------

       December 31, 2004                     $1.69                  $2.20

       September 30, 2004                    $3.58                  $3.63

       June 30, 2004                         $3.80                  $3.90

      ----------------------

      The following table sets forth the high and low closing bid prices of our
common stock from September 10, 2003, when our common stock became eligible for
quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board, to May 4, 2004, when our common stock
started trading on AMEX.

      CALENDAR QUARTER ENDED                 LOW                    HIGH
      ----------------------               -------                 -------

       Until May 4, 2004(1)                  $3.67                  $4.60

       March 31, 2004                        $3.50                  $4.00

       December 31, 2003                     $3.70                  $6.20

       September 30, 2003                    $2.25                  $4.38

      ----------------------
            (1) Represents the high and low closing bid prices for our common
      stock from April 1, 2004, to May 4, 2004, when our common stock began
      trading on AMEX.

      On February 15, 2005, we completed a private placement of 10% senior
convertible notes due February 2008, or the February Senior Notes. Each February
Senior Note is issued in increments of $50,000 and is secured by a first
priority security interest in our assets. The February Senior Notes require
semi-annual payments of interest only on August 1 and February 1 of each year,
with the principal and any unpaid interest due at maturity of the February
Senior Notes. Any prepayments of the February Senior Notes made prior to
February 2007 require the payments of premiums that decline each year. Holders
of the February Senior Notes have a one-time right to convert up to 50% of the
then outstanding principal of the February Senior Notes into shares of our
common stock, $.001 par value, at a rate $1.65 per share. Through the private
placement we issued an aggregate of $10,000,000 in February Senior Notes, in
return for exchanged notes in the aggregate principal amount of $3,250,000 and
gross cash proceeds of $6,750,000.


                                      -23-
<PAGE>

      On March 14, 2005, we completed an additional $2 million private placement
of 10% senior secured convertible notes due March 2008, or the March Senior
Notes and, together with the February Senior Notes, the Senior Notes. The March
Senior Notes were issued on a pari passu basis with the February Senior Notes
and, as a result, are secured by a first priority security interest in our
assets. The March Senior Notes require semi-annual payments of interest only on
September 1 and March 1 of each year, with the principal and any unpaid interest
due at maturity of the March Senior Notes. Any prepayments of the March Senior
Notes made prior to March 2007 require the payments of premiums that decline
each year. Holders of the March Senior Notes have a one-time right to convert up
to 50% of the then outstanding principal of the March Senior Notes into shares
of our common stock, $.001 par value, at a conversion price of $1.65 per share.

      Subject to the reasonable discretion of our management, the proceeds from
the placement of the Senior Notes are to be used to fund our shuffler inventory,
our operating losses and our general corporate purposes. Certain conditions for
the release from escrow of a portion of the proceeds from this offering are
discussed below in "Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Capital Resources--Outlook."

      The Senior Notes and the underlying shares upon the conversion of the
Senior Notes were issued under the private placement exemption under Section
4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D. We
were able to rely on Rule 506 of Regulation D because we only offered the Senior
Notes to accredited investors as that term is defined by Rule 501 of Regulation
D.

      A placement agent fee of up to four percent (4%) of the cash proceeds from
the Senior Notes are payable to Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation, as placement
agent, but no separate fee is payable with respect to the shares of common
stock.

      Dividend Policy

      We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We
presently intend to retain earnings to finance the operation and expansion of
our business and do not anticipate declaring cash dividends in the foreseeable
future. Also, under the private placements of the Senior Notes, so long as any
purchaser beneficially owns any of the Senior Notes, we shall not, without first
obtaining the written approval of such purchasers, repurchase, redeem, or
declare or pay any cash dividend or distribution on, any shares of our capital
stock.

      Equity Compensation Plan Information

      With respect to our equity compensation plans, we have adopted the Amended
and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan and the Amended and Restated 1999 Directors'
Stock Option Plan, which are authorized to issue 3,000,000 shares and 300,000
shares of our common stock, respectively.

      The following table summarizes our equity plan compensation that was
approved by stockholders on October 5, 2004.


                                      -24-
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          (a)                        (b)                              (c)

                                                                                        Number of securities remaining
                                Number of securities to        Weighted-average         available for future issuance
                                be issued upon exercise        exercise price of       under equity compensation plans
                                of outstanding options,      outstanding options,      (excluding securities reflected
Plan category                     warrants and rights         warrants and rights               in column (a))
----------------------------    -------------------------    ----------------------    ---------------------------------
<S>                                    <C>                            <C>                            <C>
Equity compensation plans              2,186,856(1)                   $3.39                          192,870(2)
  approved by stockholders

Equity compensation plans
  not approved by
  stockholders                                --                         --                               --
----------------------------    -------------------------    ----------------------    ---------------------------------
Total                                  2,186,856                      $3.39                          192,870
</TABLE>

-------------------------------
(1)   Reflects outstanding stock options to purchase 2,031,656 shares of common
      stock under our Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan and stock
      options to purchase 155,200 shares of common stock under our Amended and
      Restated 1999 Directors' Stock Option Plan.
(2)   There were 968,344 shares available for future issuance under our Amended
      and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan and 144,800 shares available for
      future issuance under our Amended and Restated 1999 Directors' Stock
      Option Plan.

ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
        OF OPERATIONS

      Statement on Forward-Looking Information

      Certain information included herein contains statements that may be
considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, such as statements relating
to plans for product development, product placement, capital spending and
financing sources. Such forward-looking information involves important risks and
uncertainties that could significantly affect anticipated results in the future
and, accordingly, such results may differ from those expressed in any
forward-looking statements made herein. Such risks, uncertainties and other
important factors include, among others: our liquidity requirements, our ability
to locate necessary sources of capital to sustain our operations, adverse
rulings or other developments in pending or future litigation, the continued
growth of the gaming industry, the success of our product development
activities, the acceptance of our products in the marketplace, vigorous
competition in the gaming industry, our dependence on existing management,
changes in gaming laws and regulations (including actions affecting licensing),
regulatory and jurisdictional issues involving us or our products specifically,
our leverage and debt service (including sensitivity to fluctuations in interest
rates), domestic or global economic conditions and the risks and factors
described from time to time in the Company's reports filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, including, but not limited to the Company's Form 10-QSB
for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004.

      Overview

      Our strategy is to develop cost-effective niche products for the global
gaming industry. We focus on products that increase the security, productivity
and profitability of casino operations. Our strategy involves marketing certain
of our products for sale or lease, depending on the product, the geographic
location of the customer and other factors. We rely on our internal sales staff
and distributor relationships for the sale and rental of our products. Although
we anticipate significant sales development and revenue growth, there is no
assurance that we will generate sufficient revenue, cash flow or profit to
sustain our operations.


                                      -25-
<PAGE>

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

      Following is a summary of what our management believes are the critical
accounting policies related to our operations. The application of these
policies, in some cases, requires management to make subjective judgments and
estimates regarding the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. See
Note 1, "Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies," to
financial statements included in this annual report for a more detailed
discussion of our accounting policies. Except as described below, we do not
employ any critical accounting policies selected from among available
alternatives or that require the exercise of significant management judgment to
apply, and we believe none of our estimates are so highly uncertain or
susceptible to change as to present a significant risk of a material impact on
our financial condition or operating performance.

      Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.

      In connection with the preparation of our financial statements, management
reviews and evaluates the collectibility of our trade receivables and adjusts
our allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts as deemed necessary in the
circumstances. These estimates have the potential for critically affecting the
determination of results of operations for any given period. Factors considered
by management in making such estimates and adjustments include any
concentrations among customers, changes in our relationships therewith, payment
history and the apparent financial condition thereof.

      Revenue Recognition.

      We recognize revenue from the sale of our shuffler and deck checker
products upon shipment against valid customer contracts or purchase orders.
Sales are recognized immediately when shufflers that are rented are converted to
purchases depending on the creditworthiness and payment history of the casino
company since payment terms are from 20 to 48 months. We recognize revenue from
the sale of our SecureDrop(R) products upon installation and functional testing
at customer locations because that is when the customer's obligation becomes
fixed and certain pursuant to our standard contracts for sale. The extended
warranty and maintenance components that are part of long term sales contracts
are unbundled and recognized as deferred revenue amortized over the remaining
life of the sales agreement after the initial 90-day warranty as required by the
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables. The useful life of our shufflers and Deck Checkers(TM) is five
years with proper maintenance; the life can be extended with the replacement of
component parts. If the customer does not possess the required creditworthiness
or an established payment history with us, we would then book the revenue as an
installment sale and recognize it over time as payments are received. Revenue
from shuffler rentals is recorded at the first of each month in accordance with
rental contract terms. All rental contracts are cancelable upon 30-day written
notice by the customer. Maintenance expense for rental units is recorded in the
period it is incurred. Although sales are not generally made with a right to
return, upon occasion, usually associated with the performance warranty, sales
returns and allowances are recorded after returned goods are received and
inspected. We provide currently for estimated warranty repair costs associated
with sales contracts. Although there are no extended warranties offered for our
products, we do provide for maintenance contracts that are billed and recognized
on a monthly basis.

      Intangible Assets.

      We currently amortize our intangible assets (patent and technology rights)
on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of 10 years. Management
believes that the useful life of patents and technology rights equals the full
term of the patent.


                                      -26-
<PAGE>

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS
No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share Based Payment (SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R requires that
compensation cost related to share based employee compensation transactions be
recognized in the financial statements. Share based employee compensation
transactions within the scope of SFAS 123R include stock options, restricted
stock plans, performance based awards, stock appreciation rights and employee
share purchase plans. The provisions of SFAS 123R are effective as of the first
interim period that begins after June 15, 2005. Accordingly, we will implement
the revised standard in the third quarter of fiscal year 2005, if applicable.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets,
an Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. The
amendments made by SFAS 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of
nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets
exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for
nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader
exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial
substance. The Statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring
in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect to enter into
any transactions that would be affected by adopting SFAS 153.

FINANCIAL CONDITION (Certain 2004 amounts have been restated.)

      During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, total assets decreased
by $9,797,561, from $24,160,178 at December 31, 2003 to $14,362,617 at December
31, 2004. Accounts receivable (trade) decreased from $3,495,038 to $2,860,931
between December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004. Inventories have increased
during the current period by $1,973,757 from $4,150,414 at December 31, 2003 to
$6,124,171 at December 31, 2004. The increase is primarily due to the purchase
of components to produce our new PokerOne shuffler and related components and
Deck Checker components.

      Total liabilities have decreased from $9,914,953 at December 31, 2003 to
$8,622,694 at December 31, 2004. Accounts payable decreased from $1,727,460 at
December 31, 2003 to $1,240,676 at December 31, 2004. Convertible debt decreased
from $2,368,077 at December 31, 2003 to $0 at December 31, 2004 due to the
retirement of long- and short-term convertible debt through cash payments and
conversion to common stock. Short-term debt decreased from $270,743 at December
31, 2003 to $238,250 at December 31, 2004 due to payment of $32,493. Notes
payable increased $3,250,000 due to the issuance of 9% notes due August 15,
2007. However, in February of 2005 the 9% notes totaling $3,250,000 were
exchanged for the February Senior Notes.

      Results of Operations - Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 (Certain
2004 amounts have been restated.)

      Revenue

      For the year ended December 31, 2004, we generated total revenues of
$3,436,560, compared to $6,710,919 for the year ended December 31, 2003, a
decrease of $3,274,359 or 48.8%. Our revenues for the year ended December 31,
2004 consisted of SecureDrop(TM) sales of $254,454, shuffler rentals of
$384,679, shuffler sales of $1,141,321, Deck Checker TM sales of $1,252,909 Deck
Checker TM Deck Checker rentals of $232,035,and miscellaneous other revenues of
$171,162. The decrease in revenue was primarily due to a decrease in
SecureDrop(TM) sales of $1,967,508, a decrease in shuffler sales of 938,099, a
decrease in shuffler rentals of $638,865, a decrease in Deck Checker TM sales of
$112,956, offset by an increase in Deck Checker rentals of $232,035, and an
increase in other of $151,034. We believe that the decreases in revenue were
due, in part, to the allocation of resources toward the transfer of certain
operations to China, the longer than anticipated approval terms for our new
products from gaming regulatory laboratories, the continued development and
testing of our new shuffler products, the pending merger transactions involving
major U.S. casino operators that have delayed negotiations involving our
SecureDrop(R) products and the delays in discussions with potential
international customers. In addition, jurisdictional licensing issues and the
ShuffleMaster injunction related to sales of PokerOneTM product all contributed
to disrupting sales activities.


                                      -27-
<PAGE>

      Revenues - SecureDrop(TM) Sales. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we
generated revenue related to the sale of our SecureDrop(TM) products of
$254,454, compared to $2,221,962 for the year ended December 31, 2003, a
decrease of $1,967,508, or 88.5%.

      Revenues - Shuffler Sales. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we
generated revenue related to the sale of our shufflers of $1,141,321, compared
to $2,079,420 for the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of $938,099, or
45.1%. The majority of these sales were from the conversion of shufflers on rent
to purchases through long-term sales agreements that range from 24 to 48 months.
We made a strategic decision to offer our customers the choice to either
continue renting or instead to purchase our shufflers for the same monthly
payments. This decision was based on competitive forces in the marketplace and
the anticipated introduction of our next generation shufflers in 2004. By
offering some of our customers the ability to trade up to our new shuffler, the
RandomPlus(TM) Shuffler, when approved by the relevant regulatory bodies, we
will be able to obtain binding purchase commitments for our shufflers and ensure
that our products are not readily replaced with those of our competitors. We
believe that conversions will not contribute to shuffler sales in the future to
the same extent conversions did in 2003. The anticipated introduction of the new
RandomPlus(TM) Shuffler in the first half of 2005 will provide a needed addition
to our product line.

      Revenue - Shuffler Rentals. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we
generated revenue related to the rental of our shufflers of $384,679, compared
to $1,023,544 for the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of $638,865, or
62.4%. The conversion of rental units to purchases in 2003 reduced the number of
shufflers that were rented throughout the year. We believe that the new
RandomPlus(TM) Shuffler that we anticipate introducing in the first half of 2005
will reverse the trend and increase the number of units that are rented.

      Revenue - Deck CheckerTM. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we
generated revenue related to the sale of our Deck CheckerTM of $1,252,909
compared to $1,365,865 for the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of
$112,956, or 8.3%. As the DeckCheckerTM was introduced in the second quarter of
2003, we expect DeckChecker TM sales will continue to grow as the number of
jurisdictions that we can sell the product increases and with the anticipated
acceptance of the product in the casino industry.

      Revenue - Other Income. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we generated
other revenues of $171,162, compared to income of $20,128 for the year ended
December 31, 2003, an increase of $151,034.

      Cost of Sales

      For the year ended December 31, 2004, our cost of sales was $3,570,070,
compared to $4,171,687 for the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of
$601,617, or 14.4%. Our cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2004
included cost of SecureDrop(TM) sales of $219,208, cost of shuffler sales of
$190,140, shuffler rental depreciation of $215,780, shuffler service costs of
$1,214,495, manufacturing costs of $805,861, Deck CheckerTM costs of $203,435,
warranty costs of ($569).Deck Checker rental depreciation of $32,325 and other
expenses of $689,395. As we transition from a development to an operating
company, we are reducing the cost of sales through more efficient purchasing and
manufacturing. The outsourcing of components from China continued the trend of
reducing cost of sales through 2004 as a percent of sales. The gross margin on
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004 was ($133,510), or (4.7%), compared
to the gross margin on revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 of
$2,539,232, or 37.8%. The decrease in gross margin of $2,672,742 from the year
ended December 31, 2003 to the year ended December 31, 2004 reflected decreased
revenue, an inventory write-down of $575,446, and increase in service costs of
$281,517.


                                      -28-
<PAGE>

      Cost of Sales - SecureDrop(TM) Sales. Our cost of SecureDrop(TM) sales
revenue was $219,208 for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $1,089,732
for the year ended December 31, 2003, representing a decrease of $870,524, or
79.9%. The gross margin percentage on revenue from SecureDrop(TM) sales revenue
was 66.5% in the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 51.0% for the year
ended December 31, 2003.

      Cost of Sales - Shuffler Sales. Our cost of shuffler sales revenue was
$190,140 for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $412,780 for the year
ended December 31, 2003, representing a decrease of $222,640, or 53.9%. The
decrease in the cost of shuffler sales revenue was due to the reduction in
revenue. The gross margin percentage on revenue from shuffler sales revenue was
83.3% in the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 80.1% for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

      Cost of Sales - Deck CheckerTM Sales. Our cost of Deck CheckerTM sales
revenue was $203,435 for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $390,935
for the year ended December 31, 2003. The gross margin percentage on revenue
from Deck CheckerTM sales revenue was 83.8%.for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to 71.4% for the year ended December 31, 2003. The improvement in gross
margin percentage is a result of our moving the manufacture and purchasing of
component parts to China.

      Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

      For the year ended December 31, 2004, our selling, general and
administrative expenses were $7,046,572, compared to $6,449,030 for the year
ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $597,542, or 9.3 %. The increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses related primarily to a $629,673
increase in salaries, a $623,832 increase in legal and regulatory expenses
offset by a $531,071 decrease in finance fees, and a $201,224 decrease in rent.
The increase in legal fees is primarily due to the Shuffle Master, Inc. lawsuit
as well as legal fees related to regulatory license applications.

      Our selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2004 consisted of the following: salaries and related costs of
$2,725,866; consulting services of $446,373; advertising and marketing costs of
$33,837; travel and entertainment costs of $682,583; gaming industry show costs
of $175,193; rent of $216,986; repairs and maintenance expense of $61,528;
supplies of $100,362; legal and regulatory expenses of $1,446,243; insurance
expenses of $92,637; depreciation and amortization of $553,742; finance fees of
$15,457; and other expenses of $465,765.

      Research and Development Expenses

      For the year ended December 31, 2004, research and development expenses
were $1,423,096, compared to $1,010,558 for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of $412,538, or 40.8%. The increase in research and development
expenses was primarily due to the continued development of the PokerOne Shuffler
and the RandomPlus(TM) Shuffler.

      Interest Expense

      For the year ended December 31, 2004, we incurred interest expenses of
$935,589, compared to $2,891,733 for the year ended December 31, 2003, a
decrease of $1,956,144, or 67.6%. This decrease was primarily attributable to
the reduction of debt service as a result of a decrease in our outstanding
indebtedness during the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2003. The retirement and conversion of indebtedness of $20,331,995
in 2003 and early 2004 is the reason for the large reduction in 2004.


                                      -29-
<PAGE>

      Net Loss

      For the year ended December 31, 2004, we had a net loss of $9,538,200
compared to a net loss of $7,812,089 for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase in net loss of $1,726,111, or 22.1%. The increase in net loss was
primarily due to a decrease in gross margin of $2,672,742, an increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses of $738,344, an increase in
research and development of $412,538 and an offsetting decrease of $1,956,144 in
interest expense. Basic loss per share was $0.55 for the year ended December 31,
2004, compared to $0.96 for the year ended December 31, 2003.

      Liquidity and Capital Resources

As a result of our operating loss and our use of cash, our net working capital
has decreased from $10,366,458 at December 31, 2003 to $4,511,094 at December
31, 2004, as shown in the table below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                December 31,
                                                       -------------------------------
                                                            2004
                                                          restated           2003
                                                       --------------   --------------
<S>                                                    <C>              <C>
Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents                              $      924,802   $   11,526,664
Current portion of accounts receivable, trade,
  net of allowance for uncollectibles of $225,590
  and $125,530                                              1,596,017        2,354,054
Due from affiliate                                             25,000           31,802
Other receivables                                              35,394           29,836
Inventories                                                 6,124,171        4,150,414
Prepaid expenses                                               86,575           52,028
                                                       --------------   --------------
         Total current assets                               8,791,959       18,144,798
                                                       --------------   --------------

Current portion of leases payable                           1,941,445        2,237,073
Accounts payable                                            1,240,676        1,727,460
Accrued expenses                                              427,199          824,307
Deferred revenues, current portion                            239,680          171,875
Short-term debt                                               238,250          270,743
Current portion of convertible debt                                          2,368,077
Customer deposits                                             193,615          178,805
                                                       --------------   --------------
         Total current liabilities                          4,280,865        7,778,340
                                                       --------------   --------------

                  Net working capital                  $    4,511,094   $   10,366,458
                                                       ==============   ==============
</TABLE>

      Sources of Capital

      Should our cash on hand plus cash from operations be insufficient during
future periods, we anticipate relying upon private and institutional sources of
debt and equity, and we may seek public, private and institutional sources of
capital for working capital purposes. During the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003, our sources of capital included a public stock offering; equipment
financing from a third party, short-term notes from stockholders, convertible
debentures and other private sources of capital.

      With respect to our equipment financing where we have sold and leased back
most of our furniture, equipment, tooling and shufflers held for rent, we have
received proceeds of $989,820 and repaid $ 2,754,607 for the year ended December
31, 2003 and have received proceeds of $723,839 and repaid $2,042,946 for the
year ended December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2004, we had outstanding
equipment financing of $2,834,689. These equipment leases have terms of 36 to 39
months and were not recorded as sales because each of the leases included a
mandatory buy-back provision.

      With respect to our short-term debt, we repaid $384,000 and received
proceeds of $700,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. We repaid $32,493 for
the year ended December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2004, we had outstanding
short-term loans in the aggregate amount of $238,250. Prior to 2003, we were
substantially dependent on short-term loans from our principal stockholder and
other directors. Despite such reliance, neither our principal stockholder nor
our directors are obligated to provide additional financing to us and our
principal stockholder and directors are free to decline to fund additional
financings to us at any time. In such event and in the absence of third party
financing sources, we may have substantial difficulties in raising additional
financings.


                                      -30-
<PAGE>

      In 2003, we raised substantial capital through private placements of
indebtedness totaling $11,050,000. We also raised net proceeds of $24,800,000 in
December 2003 from a public share offering, a substantial portion of which was
used to retire outstanding indebtedness. To fund our continuing operating cash
flow deficits in 2004, in addition to using the remaining cash we had on hand at
the beginning of the year, we obtained cash from debt and lease finance sources.
These were:

      o     In September 2004, we received debt financing in the aggregate
            principal amount of $3,250,000 through a private placement senior
            notes and warrants. We conducted the private placement of units of
            senior notes and warrants, where each unit consists of a note in the
            original principal amount of $25,000 and a warrant to purchase 1,500
            shares of common stock with an exercise price of $5.00 per share.
            Through a private placement in February 2005, we exchanged all such
            notes and warrants for an aggregate principal amount of $3,250,000
            of February Senior Notes.

      o     In the fourth quarter of 2004, we entered into five Deck Checker(TM)
            equipment leases in the aggregate amount of $810,000 under our
            existing $3,000,000 equipment lease credit line arrangement with
            Central Leasing Co. of New Jersey. We received $727,500 in cash from
            these equipment leases. The equipment leases will be paid back over
            36 months at $26,519.40 per month plus applicable taxes. At the end
            of the 36 months, we are required to purchase the equipment for 15%
            of the original lease amount. The equipment leases are secured by
            the underlying equipment.

      o     On February 15, 2005, we completed a private placement of the
            February Senior Notes. Each February Senior Note is issued in
            increments of $50,000 and is secured by a first priority security
            interest in our assets. The February Senior Notes require
            semi-annual payments of interest only on August 1 and February 1 of
            each year, with the principal and any unpaid interest due at
            maturity of the February Senior Notes. Any prepayments of the
            February Senior Notes made prior to February 2007 require the
            payments of premiums that decline each year. Holders of the February
            Senior Notes have a one-time right to convert up to 50% of the then
            outstanding principal of the February Senior Notes into shares of
            our common stock, $.001 par value, at a rate $1.65 per share.
            Through the private placement we issued an aggregate of $10,000,000
            in February Senior Notes, in return for exchanged notes in the
            aggregate principal amount of $3,250,000 and gross cash proceeds of
            $6,750,000.

      o     On March 14, 2005, we completed an additional $2 million private
            placement of the March Senior Noted. The March Senior Notes were
            issued on a pari passu basis with the February Senior Notes and, as
            a result, are secured by a first priority security interest in our
            assets. The March Senior Notes require semi-annual payments of
            interest only on September 1 and March 1 of each year, with the
            principal and any unpaid interest due at maturity of the March
            Senior Notes. Any prepayments of the March Senior Notes made prior
            to March 2007 require the payments of premiums that decline each
            year. Holders of the March Senior Notes have a one-time right to
            convert up to 50% of the then outstanding principal of the March
            Senior Notes into shares of our common stock, $.001 par value, at a
            conversion price of $1.65 per share.

      Cash Used in Operating Activities. For the year ended December 31, 2004,
net cash used in operating activities was $ 10,660,135, compared to $11,731,150
for the year ended December 31, 2003. The cash used in operating activities
during the year ended December 31, 2004 resulted from a net loss of $9,538,200,
an decrease in trade accounts receivable of $634,107, an increase in inventory
of $1,973,757, an increase in prepaid expenses of $34,547, an increase in
deferred expenses of $582,062, a decrease in accounts payable of $486,784, and a
decrease in accrued expenses of $397,108 , offset by depreciation and
amortization of $816,534, non-cash compensation expense of $269,174, an increase
in other receivables of $1,244, a decrease of deposits with vendors of $304,611,
a decrease of other assets of $265,478, an increase in deferred revenues of
$46,500 and an increase in customer deposits of $14,810.


                                      -31-
<PAGE>

      Net Cash Used In Investing Activities. For the year ended December 31,
2004, we used net cash in investing activities of $276,161 compared to
$1,567,915 for the year ended December 31, 2003. The net cash used in investing
activities during the year ended December 31, 2004 consisted of $271,261 used in
the acquisition of plant and equipment.

      Contractual Cash Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements . Our
contractual cash obligations under our debt agreements, capital leases and
operating leases for the next five years are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
CONTRACTUAL                          ----------------------------------------------------------
OBLIGATIONS              TOTAL          1 YEAR        2-3 YEARS      4-5 YEARS    AFTER 5 YEARS
-------------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
<S>                   <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Debt Agreements       $  4,447,519   $    722,203   $  3,725,316   $          0   $          0

Capital Leases           4,768,269      2,728,963        893,241              0              0

Operating Leases(1)          8,682          8,862              0              0              0
-------------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------

TOTAL                 $  7,290,890   $  2,672,333   $  4,618,557   $          0   $          0
</TABLE>

      (1) Our only "off balance sheet arrangements" at December 31, 2004 were
immaterial office equipment leases.

      Outlook

      Our ability to maintain adequate liquidity is dependent upon the success
of Management's plans to address and overcome prior operating losses. Management
has developed and refined its 2005 operating plan to increase its sales by
expanding its product line and improving its sales efforts domestically and
internationally. We have entered into an exclusive five-year agreement with TCS
to market and distribute our shuffler products outside of the United States.
Management has adopted efforts to reduce operating costs through the transfer of
manufacturing operations to China and restructuring service functions to reduce
labor and rental expense. We appointed to our board of directors Mr. Newburg,
whose career spans over 30 years, is a skilled global executive with experience
in the gaming industry, as well as in executive positions in Fortune 100
companies. Management has focused on financial condition and liquidity
improvements through its capital raising efforts in 2004 and 2005 along with
substantial debt reduction and debt conversion, resulting in an improved cash
position. As a result of anticipated sales improvements and operating cost
initiatives, management believes that we will begin to be cash flow neutral to
cash flow positive on an intermittent monthly basis by late fiscal year 2005. In
Mr. Newburg's role as executive director and expected role as an officer in due
course we anticipate substantial changes in strategies and operating plans.

      We expect to meet the escrow requirements of the February and March 2005
private placements which are as follows:

      o     One third (1/3) of the total proceeds held in escrow shall be
            released to the Company upon the execution of a distributor
            agreement with TCS or an affiliate thereof and the sale and service
            outside the United States of one hundred (100) units of the
            Company's RandomPlus ShufflerTM and the PokerOneTM shuffler, where
            such events must occur no later than June 30,2005;


                                      -32-
<PAGE>

      o     One-third (1/3) of the total proceeds held in escrow shall be
            released to the Company upon the hiring by the Company of a North
            American manager of operations or Chief Operating Officer, where
            such person shall be hired no later than June 30, 2005; and

      o     One-third (1/3) of the total proceeds held in escrow shall be
            released to the Company upon the approval of the Company's
            RandomPlusTM shuffler by Gaming Laboratories International and the
            Nevada State Gaming Control Board and the placement of one hundred
            (100) units of the Company's RandomPlusTM shuffler in North America,
            where such approvals and shuffler placement must occur no later than
            June 30, 2005.

      The second escrow condition above has already been met.

      Based on presently known commitments and plans, we believe that we will be
able to fund our operations and required expenditures through the fourth quarter
of 2005 through cash on hand, cash flow from operations, and cash from private
placements of debt or equity or from lease financing sources. In the event that
such sources are insufficient or unavailable, we will need to seek cash from
public or private placements of debt or equity, institutional or other lending
sources, sell certain assets or change operating plans to accommodate such
liquidity issues. No assurances can be given that we will successfully obtain
liquidity sources necessary to fund our operations in the upcoming year.

      Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Information

      This Report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Such
statements refer to events that could occur in the future and may be identified
by the use of words such as "intend," "plan," "believe," correlative words, and
other expressions indicating that future events are contemplated. Such
statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, and actual results
could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements
as a result of certain of the risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this
annual report. In addition to the other information contained herein, investors
should carefully consider the following risk factors.

Risks Related to VendingData

      Given our recurring losses and accumulated deficits, we must manage our
liquidity.

      Our financial statements report recurring losses and accumulated deficits.
Based on presently known commitments and plans, we believe that we will be able
to fund our operations and required expenditures through the fourth quarter of
2005 from cash on hand, cash flow from operations and cash from debt or equity
financings or from lease financing sources. If we are unable to generate a
sufficient amount of sales of our products to fund our operations, we will need
to seek cash from private or public placements of debt or equity, institutional
or other lending sources, to sell certain assets or to change operating plans to
accommodate our liquidity issues. As result of certain restrictions on our
ability to incur additional indebtedness under the Senior Notes, we may not be
able to obtain other liquidity sources as may be necessary to fund our
operations in the future.

      We have a history of significant operating losses and anticipate continued
operating losses, and we may be unable to achieve profitability.

      We have a history of significant operating losses and anticipate continued
operating losses for the foreseeable future. For the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2004, we have incurred net losses of $7,812,089 and $9,538,200,
respectively, and our operations have used $ 11,731,150 and $ 10,660,135of cash,
respectively. As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, we had accumulated deficits of
$44,582,347 and $54,120,549, respectively. If we are unable to generate a
positive cash flow in 2004, we will be required to locate additional sources of
capital. If our revenues do not increase very substantially, or if our spending
levels exceed our expectations, we will not become profitable. Revenues may not
grow in the future, and we may not generate sufficient revenues for
profitability. If we become profitable, we may not be able to sustain profitable
operations.


                                      -33-
<PAGE>

      We may not be able to satisfy the conditions for the release of all of the
proceeds from the Senior Notes that are presently held in escrow.

      Pursuant to the terms of the Senior Notes, our access to $6,750,000 in
proceeds is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions as described above
under "Liquidity and Capital Resources".

      If we fail to achieve one or more of the conditions by June 30, 2005, we
are required to return the relevant funds to investors within 30 days. The
failure to meet all of the conditions will have a negative and potentially
materially adverse impact on our liquidity.

      Our stockholders may not approve the increase in our authorized shares,
which is required to ensure a sufficient number of shares are available upon the
conversion of the March Senior Notes, if at all.

      As of February 28, 2005, we have 25,000,000 shares of common stock
authorized and 17,199,558 shares of common stock outstanding. In addition, as of
February 28, 2005, we have issued stock options to purchase 2,584,322 shares of
common stock, warrants to purchase 2,137,500 shares of common stock and February
Senior Notes convertible into 3,030,293 shares of common stock. Due to the
shares outstanding and shares reserved as of February 28, 2005, we do not have a
sufficient number of authorized shares remaining to cover the shares issuable
upon the conversion of the March Senior Notes, if at all. Accordingly, our board
of directors has already authorized an amendment to our articles of
incorporation so as to increase our total authorized number of shares. However,
since our stockholders must also approve the amendment to our articles of
incorporation and although we expect our stockholders to approve said amendment,
there is no guarantee of such a result. If the stockholders do not approve of
the amendment, we will be in breach under the terms of the March Senior Notes.

      Even if our operations do not become profitable, we will continue to be
obligated to pay our management substantial salaries and benefits.

      We currently compensate our executive officers and significant employees
with substantial salaries and other benefits and, in the future, may pay
increased salaries and benefits. We paid approximately $1,300,000 to our
executive officers and key employees in 2004. We intend to continue to pay
competitive salaries and benefits to certain executive officers and key
employees. The payment of such compensation and benefits may be a burden on us
and may be a factor in limiting or preventing our profitability. Upon the
expiration of those employment agreements, we may elect to continue compensating
management with similar or higher salaries and other benefits.

      The demand for our products may be insufficient to generate enough
revenues to sustain our operations.

      If we fail to generate sufficient demand for our products, we may be
unable to sustain operations or generate a return to investors. Until January
2000, we were in the development stage and derived minimal revenues from our
products. Currently we are an operating company that continues to develop new
products. Since January 2000, our activities have been limited to analyzing and
consulting with persons in the gaming industry, developing and manufacturing new
products, establishing distribution networks for our products, marketing our
products to the gaming industry, and commencing product sales. During such time,
we have derived only limited revenues, which have been insufficient to sustain
our operations. We may not generate sufficient revenue to sustain our
operations. No independent organization has conducted market research providing
management with independent assurance from which to estimate potential demand
for our products. The overall market may not be receptive to our products, and
we may not successfully compete in the target market for our products.


                                      -34-
<PAGE>

      The market has not yet demonstrated significant acceptance of our
SecureDrop(R) System and these products may never receive market acceptance.

      We have not yet demonstrated significant market acceptance of our
SecureDrop(R) System and may be unable to do so. We have only sold our
SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module to a small number of casinos. The SecureDrop(R)
System Soft Count Module has been slow to sell outside Nevada. Even though we
have sold units of the SecureDrop(R) System to various customers in prior
periods, newer versions of SecureDrop(R) products were in beta tests through
most of 2002. We believe that certain barriers and problems occurred that caused
us to have problems breaking into the market, including a longer than expected
sales cycle, product flaws that we subsequently corrected, and the resistance of
gaming company customers to the implementation of unproven technologies. The
commercial success of our SecureDrop(R) System will depend upon the degree of
market acceptance of this product in the gaming community and will depend on a
number of factors, including:

      o     demonstration of effectiveness and reliability;

      o     the prevalence and severity of any quality problems or defects in
            the early stage of introduction that were not anticipated in the
            design of this product;

      o     effectiveness of our marketing and distribution capabilities;

      o     ability to promptly service and repair the product; and

      o     receipt of approval by respective gaming jurisdictions.

      If we fail to expand our sales and leases for our SecureDrop(R) System, we
may be unable to generate sufficient revenues to continue to operate our
business.

      Our revenues and receivables are concentrated among a few major customers,
which means that our financial condition could deteriorate if any meaningful
reduction in the level of sales to any of these customers occurs.

      We are substantially dependent upon sales to a few major customers. In
fiscal year 2003, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (formerly Park Place Entertainment
Corporation) accounted for more than 10% of our revenues. During the year ended
December 31, 2003, approximately 17.6% of trade receivables and 13.3% of total
sales were concentrated in the Nevada gaming industry among five customers under
the common ownership of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. In fiscal year 2004 revenue
and accounts receivables were not as dependent on any one customer or
distributor. However, any adverse changes in the financial condition of our
major customers, any loss of our major customers, or any meaningful reduction in
the level of sales to any of these customers could have a materially adverse
impact on us. Furthermore, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. will be acquired by
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc., in approximately mid-2005. We have no assurance
that once acquired, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. will still purchase products
from us.

      The acceptance and expansion of coinless gaming may adversely affect the
demand for our SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module.

      We believe that in the domestic United States market, the greater emphasis
of sales will be the SecureDrop(R) Soft Count Module due to the growth of
coinless slot machines. In international markets, we intend to focus on our
SecureDrop(R) Hard Count Module in the initial time period until we gauge the
demand for the Soft Count Module overseas.


                                      -35-
<PAGE>

      We place our leased shufflers in casinos under short-term lease
arrangements, which make these products susceptible to replacement due to
pressure from competitors, changes in economic conditions, obsolescence and
declining popularity.

      All of our leased shufflers are placed with customers under short-term
lease arrangements, which, unlike long-term leases or permanent sales of our
products, can easily be terminated by a dissatisfied customer. The manner in
which such short-term leases are structured puts our shufflers at greater risk
of replacement due to pressure from competitors, changes in economic conditions,
obsolescence and declining popularity. Casino operators may terminate the use of
our products, and we may not be able to maintain and expand the number of
installed shufflers through enhancement of existing shufflers, introduction of
new shufflers, customer service or otherwise.

      Our ability to compete may be damaged, and our revenues may be reduced if
we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights adequately.

      Our success depends upon maintaining the confidentiality and proprietary
nature of our intellectual property rights. Our ability to compete may be
damaged, and our revenues may be reduced if we are unable to protect our
intellectual property rights adequately. To protect these rights, we rely
principally on a combination of:

      o     contractual arrangements providing for non-disclosure and
            prohibitions on use;

      o     patents and pending patent applications;

      o     trade secret, copyright and trademark laws; and

      o     certain built-in technical product features.

      Patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws provide limited
protection. The protections provided by laws governing intellectual property
rights do not prevent our competitors from developing, independently, products
similar or superior to our products and technologies. In addition, effective
protection of copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks, and other proprietary
rights may be unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries. We may be
unaware of certain non-publicly available patent applications, which, if issued
as patents, could relate to our services and products as currently designed or
as we may modify them in the future. Legal or regulatory proceedings to enforce
our patents, trademarks or copyrights could be costly, time consuming, and could
divert the attention of management and technical personnel.

      Adverse results in current litigation could result in substantial monetary
damages and impacts on the manufacture and sale of certain of our shuffler
products.

      Shuffle Master, our principal competitor in the shuffler market, has filed
two lawsuits against us for patent infringement. The first suit alleges that our
shufflers violate two of its patents concerning registering use of a playing
card shuffler apparatus and the displaying of the use on a display. The second
lawsuit alleges that our PokerOne(TM) Shuffler violates two of its patents
concerning the card moving mechanism. Shuffle Master seeks treble damages,
which, if awarded, could result in us owing it substantial sums of money, and,
if large enough, could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and our
ability to conduct operations. Although we believe our position to be
meritorious, litigation of this nature is a drain on our cash resources and our
management's time. Although Shuffle Master has asserted patent infringement
claims and we have reasonable defenses to the same, we cannot determine whether
we will prevail in these lawsuits, nor whether damages, if awarded, would
significantly impact our ability to continue to manufacture and sell particular
products within the United States and its territories. If we do not prevail, we
will be unable to sell our shuffler products in the United States unless we
change certain components used in the shufflers or obtain a license from Shuffle
Master to use the playing card shuffler apparatus and the display. The
preliminary injunction that ShuffleMaster obtained against the Company in
November 2004 prevented us from selling our PokerOne(TM) Shuffler in the United
States. An appellate court stayed the injunction in March 2005. Similarly, we
cannot determine whether Shuffle Master will assert other litigation claims
based upon other patents it may currently or in the future own, nor can we
determine the likely outcome of any such litigation or whether any such
substantial litigation would have a material adverse effect on our business as
presently conducted or as anticipated.


                                      -36-
<PAGE>

      We believe that it is likely that our future products will be the subject
of future patent litigation if the products are sold and installed in the United
States and, if commenced, could subject us to continuing litigation costs and
risks.

      Other than the allegations made by Shuffle Master discussed above, we are
not aware of any claims or basis for our current products infringing on the
proprietary rights of third parties. To the extent that we introduce new
products that incorporate the same or similar technology, it is likely that
Shuffle Master will bring one or more claims against us seeking damages,
injunctive or other equitable relief, or both. We cannot predict the outcome of
any future litigation that may occur.

      If our future products incorporate technology that infringes the
proprietary rights of third parties and we do not secure licenses from them, we
could be liable for substantial damages that would cause a material reduction in
revenues and impair our prospects for achieving growth and profitability.

      In furtherance of the development of our services or products, we may need
to acquire licenses for intellectual property to avoid infringement of third
party rights or claims of infringement. These licenses may not be available on
commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Claims for infringement, if made,
could damage our business prospects, our results of operations and financial
condition, whether or not the claims have merit, by:

      o     consuming substantial time and financial resources required to
            defend against them;

      o     diverting the attention of management from growing our business and
            managing operations;

      o     resulting in costly litigation; and

      o     disrupting product sales and shipments.

      If any third party prevails in an action against us for infringement of
its proprietary rights, we could be required to pay damages and either enter
into costly licensing arrangements or redesign our products so as to exclude the
infringing technology. As a result, we would incur substantial costs and delays
in product development, sales and shipments, our revenues may decline
substantially and we may not be able to achieve the growth required for us to
achieve profitability

      Our failure to compete successfully against innovative competitors or new
entrants could adversely impact our ability to sell our products and generate
revenues.

      Our market is characterized by changing technology, periodic product
obsolescence and continuous protection of proprietary technology. Our success
will depend upon our ability to sell our current products, and to develop
successor systems. We will need to introduce new products and features in a
timely manner to meet evolving customer requirements. We may not succeed in
these efforts. Even if we succeed, products or technologies developed by others
may render our products or technologies noncompetitive or obsolete, which would
impair our ability to sell our products and reduce our revenue.

      Scrutiny and attempts by third parties to compromise our products'
security, if successful, could injure product demand and force us to take back
impacted products.

      In the event that our products become susceptible to attacks by third
parties that result in a decrease or compromise of the security of our
customers' operations, we will most likely be required to take back our products
from existing customers and will lose sales and rentals from prospective
customers. Although we have tested our products for security and our products
have been tested by certain gaming regulators as part of the approval process,
our products may be susceptible to schemes by third parties to defraud the
properties where our products are used. Vulnerabilities in the security of our
products will almost certainly reduce demand for these products. Our shufflers
may become vulnerable to card counters or expert players, and the use of our
shufflers may result in financial losses for our customers. The occurrence of
any of these events would likely have a material adverse effect on our sales
revenues.


                                      -37-
<PAGE>

      Any conditions that adversely affect the gaming industry could also have a
material adverse effect on demand for our products.

      The success of our business depends solely on the gaming industry where
revenues are sensitive to general economic conditions and generally rise or fall
rapidly in relation to the condition of the overall economy. Although we cannot
accurately estimate the economic impact of the recent terrorist attacks or
current international conflicts at this time, the gaming industry has been
negatively affected by the reduction in air travel and tourism, and we expect
that any significant decline in the economic health or growth of the gaming
industry will reduce demand for our products.

      We are unable to predict the future impact that extraordinary events, such
as terrorism, the uncertainty of war and worldwide health concerns, may have on
our business and operations.

      Extraordinary events, such as terrorist attacks, acts of war or worldwide
health concerns, may cause damage or disruption to our operations, which, in
turn, could significantly impact our revenues, costs and expenses, and financial
condition. The terrorist attacks that took place in the United States on
September 11, 2001 were unprecedented events that have created many economic and
political uncertainties, especially to the gaming industry, some of which have
materially adversely affected our business, results of operations, and financial
condition and may do so again in the future. In particular, the gaming industry
has been affected by the downturn in the tourist industry as a result of the
September 11, 2001 attacks. Because our business is directly tied to the gaming
industry, the long-term effects from the September 11, 2001 attacks are unknown.
The potential for future terrorist attacks, the national and international
responses to terrorist attacks, other acts of war or hostility and concerns
about the spread of certain diseases, including severe acute respiratory
syndrome, or SARS, have created many economic and political uncertainties, which
could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition in ways that we currently cannot predict.

      Supply interruption from our manufacturing facility in China could cause
us to fail to supply customer orders on a timely basis.

      We have centralized most phases of the manufacturing process for our
products at our own facility in Xiaolan Town in Zhongshan City, China. We will
be adversely impacted if there is an interruption in our ability to receive
components or inventory from, or a material increase in labor costs in, China.
Factors that may cause a supply interruption include disruption or changes in
local China governmental, vendor or employee relationships, political unrest,
closure of ports, worldwide health concerns, including SARS, and other events
beyond our control. In the event that our manufacturing operations in Xiaolan
Town are interrupted, our ability to fill orders, ship such orders and realize
the revenues there from could be adversely affected.

      Our efforts to expand into international markets pose special risks that
could adversely affect all of our business.

      As a result of the opening of our manufacturing facility in China, we are
currently operating in international markets, and we propose to further expand
our international sales and operations. Engaging in business outside of the
United States will subject us to the customary risks of doing business in
foreign countries. These risks include fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates and controls, competitive disadvantages to established foreign businesses
with significant current market share and business/ customer relationships,
nationalization and other economic, tax and regulatory policies of local
governments and the possibility of trade embargoes, political instability or war
or other hostility, as well as the laws and policies of the United Sates
affecting foreign trade and investment. Any one or more of these factors could
materially adversely affect our ability to conduct business outside the United
States and therefore our business as whole.


                                      -38-
<PAGE>

      Our reliance on distributors in international markets and our limited
sales experience in foreign countries could cause us to lose sales and
collections on such sales.

      In general, substantially all sales of our products outside the United
States are achieved through distributor relationships. We believe the
distributors that we have engaged are experienced and reputable; however, if we
are unable to manage these relationships, our ability to generate revenue and
profits in the non-U.S. market may be adversely affected. To the extent that we
engage in direct sales outside the United States, we have limited sales
experience and history in foreign markets.

      On January 21, 2005, we entered into an exclusive five-year agreement with
TCS to market and distribute our shuffler products outside of the United States.
However, if TCS is unable to place our shuffler products outside of the United
States, our liquidity will be adversely affected.

      Due to our management's controlling interest in our common stock, our
management has the power to control all matters submitted to our stockholders,
which renders non-management stockholders' efforts to effect substantial changes
in our company more difficult.

      As of February 28, 2005, our executive officers and members of our board
beneficially own approximately 9,061,944 shares of common stock, or
approximately 50.3% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, assuming
exercise or conversion of all options, warrants and convertible debentures held
by our executive officers and members of our board that are exercisable within
60 days of February 28, 2005. Assuming the conversion of the Senior Notes into
3,636,353 shares, our executive officers and members of our board as of February
28, 2005, would beneficially own 41.8% of the outstanding shares of our common
stock. Accordingly, these stockholders have the power to control all matters
requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and
approval of mergers and other significant corporate transactions. This
concentration of ownership also has the effect of delaying, preventing or
expediting, as the case may be, a change in control of our company.

      The loss of our executive officers, significant employees or certain
members of our management could adversely impact our operations.

      Our success is substantially dependent upon the efforts and skills of Mark
Newburg, a member of our board of directors and Douglas H. Caszatt, our Acting
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Controller. We have entered into a
consulting agreement with Mr. Newburg and employment agreements with Mr. Caszatt
and other executive officers and significant employees. However, if we were to
lose the services rendered by any of our executive officers or significant
employees, key management, product development and sales functions could be
adversely affected. In addition, we compete with other potential employers for
employees, and we may not succeed in hiring and retaining the executives and
other employees that we need. An inability to hire and retain quality employees
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY

      We face intense competition from companies with longer operating
histories, greater resources and more established brand names that could use
such advantages to lower our market share and reduce our revenues.

      There is significant competition in the shuffler market, where we compete
with established companies and other entities, most of which possess
substantially greater resources than we do. Almost all of the companies with
which we compete in the shuffler market are substantially larger, have more
substantial histories, backgrounds, experience and records of successful
operations, greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources, more
employees and more extensive facilities than we now have, or will have in the
foreseeable future. It is also likely that other competitors will emerge in the
near future. Other companies may develop products competitive to our
SecureDrop(R) System. We may not be able to compete successfully with other
established gaming product manufacturers. Our inability to compete successfully
will likely result in loss of market share and lower revenues, or increases in
operating costs, such as marketing costs.


                                      -39-
<PAGE>

      We face extensive regulation from gaming and other government authorities.

      The gaming industry is a highly regulated industry and is subject to
numerous statutes, rules and regulations administered by the gaming commissions
or similar regulatory authorities of each jurisdiction. Generally, companies
that seek to introduce gaming products or concepts into such jurisdictions may
be required to submit applications relating to their activities or products
(including detailed background information concerning controlling persons within
their organization), which are then reviewed for approval. In this regard, we
may incur significant expenses in seeking to obtain licenses for our gaming
products and concepts, and our products may not be approved in all
jurisdictions. The failure to obtain such approval in any jurisdiction in which
we may seek to introduce our products or concepts could have a material adverse
effect on our business. In addition, any change to the applicable statutes,
rules and regulations that restricts or prevents our ability to operate could
have an adverse effect on us.

      Any person who is the beneficial owner of our common stock or with whom we
have a material relationship that fails or refuses to apply for a finding of
suitability, or that is found unsuitable for licensing, would be required to
dispose of all of our stock.

      Certain gaming regulatory agencies to which we are subject may investigate
any beneficial holder of our voting securities (regardless of the numbers of
shares owned), and any individual who has a material relationship or involvement
with us, in order to determine whether such individual is suitable or should be
licensed as a business associate of ours. In addition, the gaming authorities of
various jurisdictions may require our officers, directors and certain key
employees to be licensed or found suitable by these gaming authorities, which
would require these officers, directors and key employees to submit detailed
background information. Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding
of suitability or a license after being ordered to do so by gaming regulatory
agencies may be found unsuitable and we could be subject to adverse regulatory
action. In the event that the gaming authorities were to find an officer,
director, key employee, stockholder, or any other individual that has a material
relationship with us, unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having
a relationship with us, we would have to sever all relationships with that
individual, and that individual would be required to dispose of all of our
stock. This could result in the loss of key persons critical to our success or
in significant selling pressure on our stock if such persons are required to
dispose of shares of our common stock in an amount that exceeds typical trading
volumes in our shares.

      Our focus on products for the gaming industry subjects us to greater risk
than we would have if we marketed our products to multiple industries.

      We design and manufacture products and concepts solely for the gaming
industry and depend almost exclusively on our ability to generate revenues from
the rental or sale of our products to customers in the gaming industry. The
economic health of the gaming industry, and, therefore, our revenues, are
affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including:

      o     general economic conditions, such as recession, inflation, business
            cycle fluctuations and interest rates;

      o     levels of disposable income of gaming property patrons;

      o     acts of terrorism and anti-terrorism efforts;


                                      -40-
<PAGE>

      o     increased transportation costs resulting in decreased travel by
            gaming patrons;

      o     changes or proposed changes in tax laws;

      o     legal and regulatory issues affecting the development, operation and
            licensing of our gaming customers; and

      o     competitive conditions in the gaming industry.

      These factors may adversely impact the demand for our products and
materially affect the revenues that we realize on the sale or placement of our
products.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

      Our common stock is thinly traded, so our stockholders may have difficulty
in trading large amounts of stock or may lose the total value of their
investment.

      There had been no trading market for our common stock until September 10,
2003, when our common stock became eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin
Board. It was not until May 4, 2004, that our common stock began trading on
AMEX. Due to the limited trading volume of our common stock, an active trading
and/or a liquid market may be difficult to sustain. Moreover, in the event that
we are unable to continue as a going concern and we are dissolved or otherwise
terminated, you could lose your entire investment in our common stock.
Investment in our common stock is at risk of complete loss if our operations are
unsuccessful.

      Investors seeking guaranteed dividend-paying investments should not invest
in our common stock.

      Our operations may not become profitable. If we become profitable, we
intend to use any earnings that may be generated to finance the growth of our
business. Any payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of our board
of directors and will depend on, among other things, our earnings, financial
condition, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, statutory and
contractual restrictions applying to the payment of dividends, and other
considerations that our board of directors deems relevant. We also have
substantial restrictions on the ability to pay dividends under our covenants in
our Senior Notes. Accordingly, stockholders may have to sell some or all of
their common stock in order to generate cash flow from their investment.
Stockholders may not realize a gain on their investment, and they may lose all
or a significant amount of their investment when they sell their common stock.

      If we are unable to generate sufficient revenue to provide the cash
required to fund our operations in the future, we may be required to issue
additional equity or convertible debt securities to provide our operations with
additional working capital, which, in turn, will have the effect of diluting the
relative ownership of our existing stockholders.

      We have supplemented the cash deficit arising from our operations with the
proceeds from the Senior Notes, and will, if necessary, continue to supplement
with cash from private or public placements of debt or equity, institutional or
other lending sources. Although we have also utilized convertible debt
securities and warrants to raise capital in the past, we are limited under the
terms and conditions of the Senior Notes to incur additional debt. The issuance
of additional equity or convertible debt securities will have the effect of
reducing the percentage ownership of our current stockholders. In addition,
these equity or convertible debt securities may have additional rights,
preferences or privileges to those of our common stock, such as registration
rights and preferences in liquidation. In the event we are required to raise
additional funds to support our operations, additional funds may not be
available on terms favorable to our company, or at all. If adequate funds are
not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to
fund our operations or otherwise continue as a going concern.


                                      -41-
<PAGE>

      Shares eligible for sale in the near future may cause the market price for
our common stock to decline.

      In addition to the number of shares registered on behalf of investors who
purchased the Senior Notes and excluding the shares held by our executive
officers and directors, as of February 28, 2005, we have approximately 9,530,970
shares of common stock that are either freely tradable pursuant to Rule 144(k)
of the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act, or have previously been
registered by us through a registration statement filed with the SEC. As such,
the future sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in market
transactions, or the perception that these sales could occur, may depress the
market price for our common stock. These sales could also impair our ability to
raise additional capital through the sale of our equity securities in the
future.

      Our board of directors may issue blank check preferred stock, which may
affect the voting rights of our holders and could deter or delay an attempt to
obtain control of us.

      Our board of directors is authorized, without stockholder approval, to
issue preferred stock in series and to fix and state the voting rights and
powers, designation, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other
special rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications,
limitations and restrictions thereof. Preferred stock may rank prior to our
common stock with respect to dividends rights, liquidation preferences, or both,
and may have full or limited voting rights. Accordingly, issuance of shares of
preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of holders of our common
stock and could have the effect of deterring or delaying an attempt to obtain
control of us.


                                      -42-
<PAGE>

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

      Balance Sheets at December 31, 2004 (restated) and 2003

      Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2004
      (restated) and 2003

      Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Years
      Ended December 31, 2004 (restated) and 2003

      Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2004
      (restated) and 2003

      Notes to Financial Statements


                                      -43-
<PAGE>

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders
VendingData Corporation

We have audited the balance sheets of VendingData Corporation as of December 31,
2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, audits of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of VendingData Corporation as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and cash flows for
the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed, in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company's 2004
financial statements have been restated.


                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Piercy Bowler Taylor & Kern
                              Certified Public Accountants and Business Advisors

Las Vegas, Nevada

February 18, 2005, except for the portion of Note 1 captioned "Restatement", as
to which the date is November 7, 2005


                                      -44-
<PAGE>

                             VENDINGDATA CORPORATION

                                 Balance Sheets
                           December 31, 2004 and 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                2004
                                                              restated          2003
                                                           --------------   --------------
<S>                                                        <C>              <C>
                                ASSETS

Current assets:
  Cash and cash equivalents                                $      924,802   $   11,526,664
  Current portion of accounts receivable, trade net of
    allowance for uncollectibles of $223,590 and 125,530        1,596,017        2,354,054
  Due from affiliate                                               25,000           31,802
  Other receivables                                                35,394           29,836
  Inventories                                                   6,124,171        4,150,414
  Prepaid expenses                                                 86,575           52,028
                                                           --------------   --------------
                                                                8,791,959       18,144,798

Equipment rented to customers, net of
  accumulated depreciation of $564,351 and $316,245               400,594          608,555
Property and equipment, at cost, net of
  accumulated depreciation of $2,250,432 and $1,859,206           923,460        1,063,951
Intangible assets, at cost, net of
  accumulated amortization of $438,488 and $288,203             1,129,644        1,282,088
Due from affiliate                                                118,800          118,800
Accounts receivable, trade, net of current portion,
  less unamortized discount                                     1,264,914        1,140,984
Deferred expenses                                                 753,030          250,697
Deposits                                                          980,216        1,284,827
Other assets                                                           --          265,478
                                                           --------------   --------------

                                                           $   14,362,617   $   24,160,178
                                                           ==============   ==============
</TABLE>


                                      -45-
<PAGE>

                             VENDINGDATA CORPORATION

                                 Balance Sheets
                           December 31, 2004 and 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       2004
                                                                     restated            2003
                                                                  --------------    --------------
<S>                                                               <C>               <C>
                     LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:
  Leases payable, current portion                                 $    1,941,445    $    2,237,073
  Accounts payable                                                     1,240,676         1,727,460
  Accrued expenses                                                       427,199           824,307
  Deferred revenues, current portion                                     239,680           171,875
  Short-term debt                                                        238,250           270,743
  Convertible debt, current portion                                           --         2,368,077
  Customer deposits                                                      193,615           178,805
                                                                  --------------    --------------
                                                                       4,280,865         7,778,340

Deferred revenues, net of current portion                                198,585           219,890
Notes payable, net of current portion                                  3,250,000                --
Leases payable, net of current portion                                   893,244         1,916,723
                                                                  --------------    --------------
                                                                       8,622,694         9,914,953
                                                                  --------------    --------------

Stockholders' equity:
 Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized
 Common stock, $.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized,
   17,199,558 and 16,765,580 share issued and outstanding                 17,200            16,766
 Additional paid-in capital                                           59,843,270        58,810,806
 Deficit                                                             (54,120,547)      (44,582,347)
                                                                  --------------    --------------
                                                                       5,739,923        14,245,225
                                                                  --------------    --------------
                                                                  $   14,362,617    $   24,160,178
                                                                  ==============    ==============
</TABLE>

                  See accompanying notes to financial statement


                                      -46-
<PAGE>

                             VENDINGDATA CORPORATION

                            Statements of Operations
                     Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003

                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                               --------------------------------
                                                    2004
                                                  restated            2003
                                               --------------    --------------

Sales                                          $    2,648,684    $    5,667,247
Rental                                                616,714         1,023,544
Other                                                 171,162            20,128
                                               --------------    --------------
                                                    3,436,560         6,710,919
                                               --------------    --------------

Operating expenses:
Cost of sales                                       3,570,070         4,171,687
Selling, general and administrative                 7,046,005         6,449,030
Research and development                            1,423,096         1,010,558
                                               --------------    --------------
                                                   12,039,171        11,631,275
                                               --------------    --------------

Loss from operations                               (8,602,611)       (4,920,356)
                                               --------------    --------------

Interest expense, including $31,974 and
$529,742 to related parties                           935,589         2,891,733
                                               --------------    --------------

Net loss                                       $   (9,538,200)   $   (7,812,089)
                                               ==============    ==============

 Basic loss per share                          $        (0.55)   $        (0.96)
                                               ==============    ==============

 Weighted average shares outstanding               17,187,664         8,134,173
                                               ==============    ==============

                 See accompanying notes to financial statements.


                                      -47-
<PAGE>

                             VENDINGDATA CORPORATION

                  Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
                Years Ended December 31, 2004 (restated) and 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       Additional
                                           Common Shares                Paid-in       Accumulated
      Activity                        Stock            Dollars          Capital         Deficit            Total
                                  --------------   --------------   --------------   --------------    --------------
<S>                               <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>               <C>
Balances (deficiency),
  January 1, 2003                      7,625,814   $        7,626   $   26,719,980   $  (36,770,258)   $  (10,042,652)

Stock issued for services                 75,000               75          168,675               --           168,750

Stock issued in public offering        5,500,000            5,500       24,839,460               --        24,844,960

Stock issued for conversion
  of debt                              3,564,766            3,565        6,512,147               --         6,515,712

Exercise of warrants                          --               --           76,500               --            76,500

Warrants issued for service                   --               --          298,250               --           298,250

Employee options issued                       --               --          195,794               --           195,794

Net loss for 2003                             --               --               --       (7,812,089)       (7,812,089)
                                  --------------   --------------   --------------   --------------    --------------

Balances, December 31, 2003           16,765,580           16,766       58,810,806      (44,582,347)       14,245,225

Exercise of employee options               1,360                2            2,380               --             2,382

Stock issued for conversion of
  debt                                   362,218              362          814,563               --           814,925

Exercise of warrants                      70,400               70               --               --                70

Repayment for Stock Issue
  Expenses                                    --               --           36,731               --            36,731

Employee options issued                       --               --          178,790               --           178,790

Net loss for 2004                             --               --               --       (9,538,200)       (9,538,200)
                                  --------------   --------------   --------------   --------------    --------------

Balances, December 31, 2004           17,199,558   $       17,200   $   59,843,270   $  (54,120,547)   $    5,739,923
                                  ==============   ==============   ==============   ==============    ==============
</TABLE>

                 See accompanying notes to financial statements.


                                      -48-
<PAGE>

                             VENDINGDATA CORPORATION

                            Statements of Cash Flows
                     Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 December 31,
                                                       --------------------------------
                                                            2004
                                                          restated            2003
                                                       --------------    --------------
<S>                                                    <C>               <C>
Net cash used in operating activities                  $  (10,660,135)   $  (11,731,150)
                                                       --------------    --------------

Cash flows from investing activities:
   Acquisition of property and equipment                     (271,261)         (939,376)
   Acquisition of intangible assets                            (4,900)         (526,167)
   Deposits                                                        --          (102,372)
                                                       --------------    --------------
Net cash used in investing activities                        (276,161)       (1,567,915)
                                                       --------------    --------------

Cash flows from financing activities:
   Reimbursement of offering expense                           36,731
   Proceeds from sale of stock, warrants and options            2,380        25,415,504
   Proceeds from capital leases financing                     723,839           989,820
   Repayment of capital leases                             (2,042,946)       (2,754,607)
   Proceeds from stockholder loans                                 --           700,000
   Repayment of stockholder loans                                  --        (1,310,000)
   Proceeds from convertible debt                           3,250,000        11,050,000
   Repayment of convertible and other debt                 (1,635,570)      (11,043,285)
                                                       --------------    --------------
Net cash provided by financing activities                     334,434        23,047,432
                                                       --------------    --------------

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents          (10,601,862)        9,748,367
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year               11,526,664         1,778,297
                                                       --------------    --------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                 $      924,802    $   11,526,664
                                                       ==============    ==============
</TABLE>

                 See accompanying notes to financial statements.


                                      -49-
<PAGE>

                             VENDINGDATA CORPORATION

                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies

      VendingData Corporation (the "Company") is in the business of developing
and distributing products related to the gaming industry. The Company's
principal products are electronic card shuffling devices, an electronically
identified coin collection bucket and collection cart for use with coin operated
gaming and vending devices and a "softcount" collection system for control over
soft currency from gaming and vending devices. The Company operates principally
in the United States of America, however, a portion of its revenues are derived
from sales to customers in foreign countries.

RESTATEMENT

      As reported on our Form 8-K dated November 1, 2005 filed with the SEC, we
concluded, after consultation with our independent auditors, that errors in
revenue recognition practices and in allocation of labor and overhead costs to
inventory require restatement of previously reported financial results for
fiscal 2004. We have reversed $2,050,551 of revenue recognized during the year
ended December 31, 2004, with respect to four contracts, and reduced inventory
and cost of sales by $338,455 and $402,018, respectively, as of December 31,
2004 , and increased research and development, and selling, general and
administrative expenses during the year then ended by, 238,475 and 502,565,
respectively, and made other resulting adjustments to the financial statements
of the Company. The effect of the restatements was to increase previously
reported net loss by $2,389,006 ($0.13 per share) for the year ended December
31, 2004. These adjustments will not result in present or future cash
expenditures.

      Cash Equivalents

      All highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of three
months or less are considered cash equivalents.

      Estimates

      The preparation of the Company's financial statements requires management
to make estimates that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements
and accompanying notes which estimates may require revision in future financial
statements.

      Inventory

      Inventory is stated at the lower of cost, determined using the first in,
first out method, or market. Inventory consisted of the following at December
31, 2004 and December 31, 2003

                                                     December 31,
                                                        2004        December 31,
                                                       restated         2003
                                                     ------------   ------------

Raw material ....................................... $  2,616,731   $  2,048,707
Work in progress ...................................    1,391,467      2,089,387
Finished goods .....................................    2,115,973         12,320
                                                     ------------   ------------
                                                     $  6,124,171   $  4,150,414
                                                     ============   ============


                                      -50-
<PAGE>

      Deposits

      The table below sets forth the details of the deposits as of December 31,
2004 and 2003:

                                                     December 31,
                                                        2004        December 31,
Item                                                   restated         2003
-------                                              ------------   ------------

Rent                                                 $     42,968   $     42,968
Leases                                                    509,968        634,519
Vendors                                                   281,763        313,935
Other                                                     145,517        293,405
                                                     ------------   ------------
                                                     $    980,216   $  1,284,827
                                                     ============   ============

      Property and equipment

      Property and equipment (Note 3), including equipment rented to customers,
is carried at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets of 3-5 years,
which, in the case of leasehold improvements is limited to the life of the lease
and renewal period, so long and renewal is intended.

      Intangible assets

      Patent and trademark costs (Note 4) are amortized using the straight-line
method over an appropriate estimated useful life pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. The Company currently amortizes these intangible assets on a
straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of 10 years.

      Fair value of financial instruments

      The Company's financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts and loans receivable, and accounts payable and accruals. The carrying
amounts of these financial instruments approximate fair value because of their
short-term maturities or interest yields that approximate market rates.

      Revenue recognition

      The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of its products upon shipment
against valid customer contracts or purchase orders. Sales are recognized
immediately when shufflers that are rented are converted to purchases or there
is a long-term contract for new equipment depending on the creditworthiness and
payment history of the casino company since payment terms are from 20 to 48
months. The extended warranties and maintenance components that are part of
long-term sales contracts are unbundled and recognized as deferred revenue
amortized over the remaining life of the sales agreement after the initial
90-day warranty period as required by the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No.
00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. The estimated useful
life of the Company's shufflers and Deck Checkers(TM) is five years with proper
maintenance; the life can be extended with the replacement of component parts.
If the customer does not possess the required creditworthiness or an established
payment history with the Company, the Company would then book the revenue as an
installment sale and recognize it over time as payments are received. Revenue
from shuffler rentals is recorded at the first of each month in accordance with
rental contract terms. All rental contracts are cancelable upon 30-day written
notice by the customer. Maintenance expense for rental units is recorded in the
period it is incurred. Although sales are not generally made with a right to
return, on occasion, usually associated with the performance warranty, sales
returns and allowances are recorded after returned goods are received and
inspected. The Company provides currently for estimated warranty repair costs
associated with sales contracts. The Company offers maintenance contracts that
are billed and recognized on a monthly basis.


                                      -51-
<PAGE>

      Advertising

      Advertising costs are charged to selling, general and administrative
expenses when incurred and were $33,837 and $64,563 for the years ended December
31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      Stock-based compensation

      The Company currently has two stock option plans (Note 6). Effective as of
January 1, 2003, management adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
"SFAS" No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, under the prospective
transition method of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure.

      Loss per share (basic and diluted)

      Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available
to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the year. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net
income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during the year plus potential dilutive
instruments such as stock options, warrants and convertible debt. The effect of
stock options on diluted loss per share is determined through the application of
the treasury stock method, whereby proceeds received by the Company based on
assumed exercises are hypothetically used to repurchase the Company's common
stock at the average market price during the period.

      The basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the
period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. No diluted loss per share is presented since the assumed exercise of
common stock equivalents would have an anti-dilutive effect due to the losses.

      Warranties

      As part of the normal sale of its products, the Company has provided its
customers with product warranties. Management determines the warranty accrual on
each sale based on known product failure rates of key components, historical
experience, service staff costs and other variables that affect the liability.
The following summarizes the accrual of product warranties that is recorded as
accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheets at December 31, 2004 and
2003.

                                                  Year Ended December 31,
                                               ----------------------------
                                                   2004            2003
                                               ------------    ------------

Opening balance                                $     12,566    $     10,151
Accruals                                              5,068          29,804
Payments                                             (8,842)        (27,389)
                                               ------------    ------------
Balance at end of year                         $      8,792    $     12,566
                                               ============    ============

Note 2. Segments

      The segments identified for geographic region-based enterprise-wide data
are as follows:

                          Year Ended                      Year Ended
                       December 31, 2004               December 31, 2003
                -----------------------------   -----------------------------
                    Revenue       Long-lived                      Long-lived
                   restated         Assets         Revenue          Assets
                -------------   -------------   -------------   -------------

North America   $   1,997,832   $   2,643,866   $   6,001,089   $   2,613,111
Asia                  962,775         530,025         261,360         310,046
Europe                187,666              --         300,000              --
South America              --              --         148,470              --
Australia             288,287              --              --              --


                                      -52-
<PAGE>

      The Company's revenues distributed by product are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                       Year Ended
                   December 31, 2004                                                      Year Ended
                        restated                                                       December 31, 2003
----------------------------------------------------------         ---------------------------------------------------------
  Shufflers          Deck Checkers(TM)       SecureDrop(R)           Shufflers         Deck Checkers(TM)       SecureDrop(R)
-------------          -------------         -------------         -------------         -------------         -------------
<S>                    <C>                   <C>                   <C>                   <C>                   <C>
$   1,526,000          $   1,484,944         $     254,454         $   3,102,964         $   1,365,865         $   2,221,962
</TABLE>

Note 3. Property and Equipment

      Property and equipment, excluding equipment rented to customers, consists
of the following at December 31, 2004 and 2003:

                                                     December 31,   December 31,
                                                         2004           2003
                                                     ------------   ------------

Equipment and vehicles, furniture and fixtures ...   $  1,983,744   $  1,851,244
Tooling ..........................................        768,280        697,304
Leasehold improvements ...........................        421,867        374,609
                                                     ------------   ------------
                                                        3,173,891      2,923,157
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization ...      2,250,432      1,859,206
                                                     ------------   ------------
                                                     $    923,459   $  1,063,951
                                                     ============   ============

      A substantial portion of the Company's furniture and equipment are held
under capital leases (Note 5).

Note 4. Intangible Assets

      The Company acquired the patent rights for the Deck Checker(TM) for
$1,004,900 in 2003. The following table sets forth the estimated aggregate
amortization of these and other intangible asset costs for the next five years:

              --------------                -------------------
                   2005                           $156,813
                   2006                           $156,813
                   2007                           $156,813
                   2008                           $137,925
                   2009                           $130,185


                                      -53-
<PAGE>

Note 5. Convertible Debt with Warrants and Leases Payable

      As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, our long-term obligations consist of
convertible debt with warrants and capital lease obligations as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           December 31, 2004      December 31, 2003
                                                                           -----------------      -----------------
<S>                                                                        <C>                    <C>
9.0% unsecured notes due August 15, 2007 with non-detachable
warrants to purchase 1,500 shares of common stock at $5.00
per share for each $25,000 of principal. As of February 15,
2005 these notes were exchanged for 10.0% secured,
convertible notes as part of an aggragate $12,000,000
convertible note offerings. The new notes are convertible at
$1.65 per share of common stock for 50% of the note
principal amount .......................................................   $       3,250,000

9.5% unsecured notes payable, convertible into common stock
at $13.00 per share ....................................................                  --                  3,077

9.5% unsecured notes payable, convertible into common stock
one year after issuance at $1.75 per share, with
non-detachable warrants to purchase 2,500 shares at $1.75
for each $50,000 note ..................................................                  --              1,600,000

10% unsecured notes payable, maturing in 2005, convertible
into a maximum of 333,334 shares of common stock beginning
December 2004 until June 2005, at $2.25 per share, with
detachable warrants to purchase 6,000 shares of common stock
at $2.25, for each $50,000 note ........................................                  --                390,000

10% unsecured notes payable due November 22, 2003 with 15%
of its then outstanding principal convertible into common
stock at $2.25 per share, with detachable warrants to
purchase 225,000 shares at $2.25 and with additional
five-year warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock
at $2.25 per share for each $1,000,000 in principal that
remains after November 22, 2003 ........................................                  --                225,000

10% unsecured note payable due November 20, 2003 with 15% of
its then outstanding principal convertible into shares of
common stock at $2.25 per share and with additional
five-year warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock
at $2.25 per share for each 30-day period that the note
remains outstanding past November 20, 2003 .............................                  --                150,000
                                                                           -----------------      -----------------
                                                                                   3,250,000              2,368,077

Capitalized lease obligations for leased furniture, tooling
and equipment(1) net of deferred interest of $418,873 and
$626,526 for December 2003 and December 2002, respectively .............           2,834,689              4,153,796
                                                                           -----------------      -----------------
                                                                                   6,084,689              6,521,873
Less current portion....................................................          (1,941,445)            (4,605,150)
                                                                           -----------------      -----------------
Long-term portion ......................................................   $       4,143,244      $       1,916,723
                                                                           =================      =================
</TABLE>

---------------------------------

(1)   The $3,250,000 notes with non-detachable warrants were converted to 10%
      convertible notes as part of the companies note offering in February
      2005.Interest of $61,705 is payable on the original notes through the
      conversion date of February 15, 2005.
(2)   The Company has entered into certain sale-leaseback transactions primarily
      for assets rented to, or intended to be rented to, customers, under
      operating leases. Since the leases contained effective mandatory buyback
      provisions resulting in the Company retaining rights to use these assets
      in its business for their remaining useful lives, no gain or loss was
      recognized on the sale-leaseback transactions pursuant to paragraph 17 of
      the Statements of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 28
      Accounting for Sales with Leasebacks. The amortization of the assets
      recorded as capital leases is included with depreciation. The effective
      annual interest rates implicit in the capital leases range from 25% to
      28%. The terms of the leases range from 36 months to 39 months.


                                      -54-
<PAGE>

      Scheduled maturities of these obligations as of December 31, 2004 and
2003, are summarized as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              Notes Payable
                                                                                  With
                                                                              Non-Detachable
                  December 31, 2004                     Leases Payable(1)       Warrants (2)            Total
                  -----------------                     -----------------    -----------------    -----------------
<S>                                                     <C>                  <C>                  <C>
Due during the year ending December 31:
     2005............................................   $       2,145,683                   --    $       2,145,683
     2006............................................             523,078                   --              523,078
     2007............................................             363,089    $       3,311,705            3,674,794
     2008............................................              76,500                   --               76,500
                                                        -----------------    -----------------    -----------------

Minimum future lease payments........................           3,108,350            3,311,705            6,420,055
   Less interest component...........................            (273,661)             (61,705)            (335,366)
                                                        -----------------    -----------------    -----------------
                                                                2,834,689            3,250,000            6,084,689
Less current portion.................................          (1,941,445)                               (1,941,445)
                                                        -----------------    -----------------    -----------------
Long-term portion....................................   $         893,244    $       3,250,000    $       4,143,244
                                                        =================    =================    =================

<CAPTION>
                                                                                Convertible
                  December 31, 2003                       Leases Payable       Notes Payable            Total
                  -----------------                     -----------------    -----------------    -----------------
<S>                                                     <C>                  <C>                  <C>
Due during the year ending December 31:
     2004............................................   $       2,751,848    $       2,368,077    $       5,119,925
     2005............................................           1,826,957                   --            1,826,957
     2006............................................             204,352                   --              204,352
     2007............................................               7,977                   --                7,977
                                                        -----------------    -----------------    -----------------

Minimum future lease payments........................           4,791,134            2,368,077            7,159,211
   Less interest component...........................            (637,338)                  --             (637,338)
                                                        -----------------    -----------------    -----------------

                                                                4,153,796            2,368,077            6,521,873

Less current portion.................................          (2,237,073)          (2,368,077)          (4,605,150)
                                                        -----------------    -----------------    -----------------
Long-term portion....................................   $       1,916,723    $              --    $       1,916,723
                                                        =================    =================    =================
</TABLE>

----------------------------------------

Note 6. Stockholders' Equity

      Public Offering. The Company successfully completed a public offering in
December 2003 of 5.5 million shares of common stock at $5 per share. The gross
proceeds was $27.5 million with net proceeds after commissions and offering
costs deducted from proceeds was $24.8 million

      Stock Options. The Company has an aggregate of 6,000 options to purchase
common stock at $1.69 per share, 667 options at $2.25 per share, 903 options at
$1.66 per share, 5,333 options at $1.72 per share, 621,800 options at $1.75 per
share, 10,000 options at $2.49 per share, 962,000 options at $2.50 per share,
15,000 options at $3.60 per share, 82,600 options at $3.63 per share, 25,000
options at $3.75 per share, 15,000 options at $3.85 per share, 52,350 options at
$3.90 per share, 75,000 options at $3.98 per share, 5,000 options at $6.00 per
share, 110,000 options at $7.50 per share, 72,500 options at $12.50 per share,
98,840 options at $13.00 per share and 100 options at $15.00 per share
outstanding at December 31, 2004.


                                      -55-
<PAGE>

      The following is a summary of transactions involving stock options:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Range of
                                           Shares            Exercise Prices      Average Price
                                       --------------      ------------------     -------------
<S>                       <C>          <C>                 <C>                    <C>
      Balance             12/31/00         253,320            $5.00-$15.00            $10.00
         Granted                           652,150            $1.75-$13.00            $4.20
         Cancelled                          70,800            $5.00-$15.00            $5.75

      Balance             12/31/01         834,670            $5.00-$15.00            $5.40
         Granted                           117,550            $1.75-$13.00            $3.80
         Cancelled                          25,450            $7.50-$13.00            $9.68

      Balance             12/31/02         926,770            $1.75-$15.00            $5.09
         Granted                         1,246,850            $1.75-$3.90             $2.60
         Cancelled                          66,490            $1.75-$13.00            $8.47

      Balance             12/31/03       2,107,130            $1.75-$15.00            $3.51
         Granted                           319,836            $1.66-$3.98             $2.63
         Cancelled                         238,540            $1.75-$13.00            $5.77

      Balance             12/31/04       2,188,426            $1.69-$15.00            $4.97
</TABLE>

      The weighted average fair value at the date of grant for options granted
during 2004 and 2003 as described above were $0.77 in 2004 and $0.16 per share
in 2003. The fair value of the options at the date of grant was estimated using
the Black-Scholes model with assumptions as follows:

                                                    2004              2003
                                                --------------    --------------

      Market value...........................     $1.69-$3.98       $2.25-$3.90
      Expected life in years.................       3 to 6            3 to 6
      Interest rate..........................        1.95%              2-3%
      Volatility.............................       10%-70%              1%
      Dividend yield.........................        0.00%             0.00%

      The impact of the adoption of the fair value method of accounting for
stock-based compensation was an increase to stock-based compensation expense
included in selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately
$90,075 for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2004. As a result of
adopting SFAS No. 123 under the prospective transition method of SFAS No. 148,
prior periods have not been restated to reflect the impact of the fair value
method.

      Warrants. The Company has outstanding an aggregate of 10,000 warrants to
purchase common stock at $13.00 per share, 240,000 warrants to purchase common
stock at $1.75 per share, 195,000 warrants to purchase common stock at $5.00 per
share, 150,000 warrants to purchase common stock at $2.50 per share and
1,900,000 warrants to purchase common stock at $2.25 per share, 45,000 warrants
to purchase common stock at $50.00 per share outstanding at December 31, 2004.
As of December 31, 2004, there were options and warrants outstanding to purchase
a total of 4,726,856 shares of common stock with a weighted average exercise
price of $3.39 per share.

Note 7. Income Taxes

      At December 31, 2004, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for
federal income tax purposes of approximately $51,000,000 that may be offset
against future taxable income. These operating loss carryforwards expire in the
years 2010 through 2024. No tax benefit has been reported in the financial
statements because the potential tax benefits of the net operating loss
carryforwards are effectively offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount
as a result of significant uncertainties as to their realizability in the
future.


                                      -56-
<PAGE>

      The reconciliation of the effective tax rate to the statutory rates is as
follows:

                                                 December 31,
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                                       2004                       2003
                                     restated
                             ------------------------   ------------------------
                                 Amount          %          Amount          %
                             -------------    -------   -------------    -------

Income tax benefit at
  statutory rate of 34%....  $   3,242,988       34%    $   2,656,110       34%

Effect of permanent
  differences .............        (26,640)                   (23,020)

Valuation allowance........     (3,216,348)      34%       (2,633,090)      34%

Net deferred tax
  assets...................             --        0%               --        0%
                             -------------              -------------

                             $          --              $          --
                             =============              =============

      Deferred tax assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following at
December 31, 2004 and 2003:

                                                   December 31,
                                          -------------------------------
                                               2004             2003
                                             restated
                                          --------------   --------------

Operating loss carry forwards............ $   19,793,000   $   14,885,000

Accrued vacation ........................         45,000           54,000

Deferred rent ...........................         22,000           33,000

Allowance for uncollectibles ............         76,000               --

Depreciation ............................        (57,000)         (12,000)

Less valuation allowance.................    (19,879,000)     (14,960,000)
                                          --------------   --------------
                                          $           --   $           --
                                          ==============   ==============

Note 8. Related Party Transactions

      The Company had an employment agreement with its former chief executive
officer, effective January 1, 2000, that provides for annual compensation of
$284,000 through December 31, 2004, at which time the compensation is to be
renegotiated. The agreement also provided for the granting of 20,000 options
($12.50 per share) through 2002 based upon the Company meeting its goals
provided by the Board of Directors. Options were granted in January 2001 for
20,000 shares pursuant to the contract at an exercise price of $7.50 per share.
The Company extended the contract in June of 2003 for an additional five years
which included a grant of 500,000 options at an exercise price of $2.50. The
contract was terminated by mutual agreement on March 25, 2005.

      In connection with private placements and other transactions in 2002, 2001
and 1999, the Company issued 9.5% unsecured notes payable to certain directors,
officers and controlling stockholders, all of which, as described in Note 5,
were convertible into and issued together with warrants to purchase shares of
the Company's common stock, in exchange for cash as follows:


                                      -57-
<PAGE>

                                                Year Ended December 31,
                                            ---------------------------------
                                                 2004               2003
                                            --------------     --------------

Balance outstanding, beginning of
  year.............................         $    1,182,493     $    5,942,489
Notes issued for cash................                   --            100,000
Repayments...........................           (1,182,493)          (260,000)
Conversion...........................                   --         (4,599,996)
                                            --------------     --------------

Balances outstanding, end of period..       $           --     $    1,182,493
                                            ==============     ==============
Convertible notes with attached
  warrants...........................       $           --     $    1,150,000
Other notes payable..................                   --             32,493
                                            --------------     --------------

                                            $           --     $    1,182,493
                                            ==============     ==============
Related party interest expense for
  the year.........................         $       31,974     $      529,742
                                            ==============     ==============

      As of December 31, 2004, an officer and director of the Company had an
outstanding balance due to the Company in an amount equal to $16,905.88 that was
attributable to disbursements that were made on his behalf for personal expenses
over the past six years. The officer and director has since resigned from the
Company, and the Company has withheld payments in excess of the amount due. The
net amount will be paid to the individual after completion of the
reconciliation.

Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies

      Building Lease. The Company is obligated under a building lease agreement
until December 31, 2006, with one (1) option to extend for a five-year period.
The lease agreement provides for scheduled increases based, in part on the
annual Consumer Price Index. The Company also leases office space in other
locations including China and certain office equipment under operating leases.
Rent expense was $601,754 and $418,210 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively.

      Future minimum rentals, including escalation provisions as of December 31,
2004, under the leases are as follows:

            2005................................................. $ 694,282

            2006................................................. $ 695,493

      Legal Matters. On March 27, 2002, Shuffle Master, Inc. filed a complaint
(Case No. CV-S-02-0438-JCM-PAL) against the Company in the United States
District Court, District of Nevada. The complaint alleges, among other things,
claims for patent infringement and requests treble damages, an injunction
enjoining the Company from infringing Shuffle Master, Inc.'s patents, an
accounting of gains and profits that resulted from the alleged infringement, and
for interest, costs and attorneys' fees. The Company has filed counterclaims
seeking declaratory relief for invalidity of the patents and non-infringement.
The Company cannot predict the likely outcome of this litigation. However, if
there is an adverse result in this litigation, the Company believes there will
be a material adverse effect.

      On October 5, 2004, Shuffle Master filed another patent infringement
action against the company in the United States District Court, District of
Nevada (Case No. CV-S-04-1373-JCM-LRL). The complaint alleges, among other
things, claims for patent infringement and requests treble damages, and an
injunction enjoining the Company from infringing Shuffle Master, Inc.'s patents.
The United States District Court, District of Nevada, granted the Motion for
Preliminary Injunction filed by Shuffle Master, Inc. On March 3, 2005, the Court
of Appeals stayed the preliminary injunction granted by the United States
District Court pending the disposition of our appeal. A Markman hearing is
scheduled for May 16, 2005. The Company cannot predict the likely outcome of
this litigation. However, if there is an adverse result in this litigation, the
Company believes there will be a material adverse effect.


                                      -58-
<PAGE>

      Liquidity Issues. The Company's ability to maintain adequate liquidity may
be dependent upon the success of management's plans to address and overcome
prior operating losses. Management has developed and refined its 2005 operating
plan to increase its sales by the rollout of new shuffler products and improving
its sales efforts domestically and internationally. Management continues in its
efforts to reduce operating costs through the transfer of manufacturing
operations to China. Management has focused on financial condition and liquidity
improvements through its capital raising efforts in 2004 and in the first
quarter of 2005, resulting in an improved cash position. As a result of
anticipated sales improvements and operating cost initiatives, management
believes that the Company will begin to generate positive operating cash flow
during the second half of 2005. The Company has received a one-year extension to
a commitment for a $3.0 million lease line of credit from April 1, 2005 to March
31, 2006.

      Tax Audit. In early February 2004, the State of Nevada initiated a
sales/use tax audit of Central and Madison Leasing. The Company has sold and
leased back shufflers and Deck Checkers over the last five years. The auditor
for the State of Nevada is trying to determine at what level a sale tax needs to
be collected. The Company now collects from our customers in Nevada and remits
to the State of Nevada. There is a possibility that if the State of Nevada
determines that the sales of the products to the leasing company is the level at
which sales/use tax should have been collected there would be a liability that
would be passed to the Company from the leasing companies. The amount of this
potential liability could range from a refund of $144,000 to the payment of
sales/use tax with interest and penalties up to $500,000. A hearing is scheduled
for the second quarter with the State of Nevada Department of Taxation. The
Company is defending its position in this matter.

Note 10. Trade Receivables From Major Customers

      The Company is substantially dependent upon sales to a major customer.
During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
(formerly Park Place Entertainment Corporation) accounted for more than 10% of
our revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2003, approximately 17.6% of
trade receivables and 13.3% of total sales were concentrated in the Nevada
gaming industry among five customers under the common ownership of Caesars
Entertainment, Inc compared to 5.4% of trade receivables and 22% of total sales
for the year ended December 31, 2004. We have no assurance that once acquired by
its new owner, that Caesars Entertainment, Inc. will still purchase products
from us.


                                      -59-
<PAGE>

Note 11. Additional cash flow information

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   December 31,
                                                                        --------------------------------
                                                                             2004
                                                                           restated           2003
                                                                        --------------    --------------
<S>                                                                     <C>               <C>
Net loss ............................................................   $   (9,538,200)   $   (7,812,089)

  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating
    activities:
    Depreciation and amortization ...................................          816,535         1,194,842
    Amortization of deferred interest ...............................          269,174           350,739
    Bad Debt Expense ................................................                            140,504
    Other non-cash cost .............................................          153,316           115,890
Changes in assets and liabilities:
  Increase in accounts receivable ...................................          634,107        (3,528,752)
  Increase in other receivables .....................................            1,244             9,469
  Increase in due from affiliate ....................................                             (1,209)
  Increase in inventory .............................................       (1,973,758)       (2,300,362)
  (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses ...........................          (34,549)          184,551
  Increase in other assets ..........................................          266,143
  (Increase) decrease in deposits ...................................           14,810          (313,936)
  Increase (decrease) in deferred expenses ..........................         (786,178)            5,597
  Increase (decrease) in accounts payable ...........................         (486,783)          311,573
  Decrease in accrued expenses ......................................         (347,107)         (271,718)
  Increase in deferred revenues .....................................           46,500           391,765
  Increase (decrease)  in customer deposits .........................          304,611          (208,014)
                                                                        --------------    --------------
Net cash used in operating activities ...............................   $  (10,660,135)   $  (11,731,150)
                                                                        ==============    ==============
Supplemental cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest ............................................   $      611,629    $    1,636,512

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
  Loans converted into common stock .................................   $      765,000    $    6,515,712
  Stock issued in exchange for consulting services ..................   $           --    $      168,750
  Unpaid balance on purchase of intangible included in accounts
    payable .........................................................   $           --    $      500,000
</TABLE>


                                      -60-
<PAGE>

ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
        FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

      None.

ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

      (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls. In our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed by us with the SEC on March 31, 2005
("Original Annual Report"), we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the 2004 fiscal year. Disclosure
controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we
file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in
the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to our management, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.

      In the Original Annual Report, we reported that based on the evaluation
conducted as of December 31, 2004, we concluded that, subject to certain
limitations noted in the Original Annual Report, our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose
in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules
and forms. In connection with the analysis that led up to the restatements set
forth in this Amendment No. 2 to the Original Annual Report, we concluded that
the circumstances underlying the restatements indicate that our disclosure
controls and procedures as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, were
deficient in respect of certain actions by former senior management to override
established financial controls and procedures. We believe that all such
deficiencies were corrected prior to September 30, 2005.

      (b) Changes in Disclosure Controls and Procedures. In the Original Annual
Report we disclosed that although there have been no significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these
controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, we are continuously
evaluating means of enhancing our internal controls. In 2004, the finance
department undertook a review of internal control processes. A more
comprehensive approach will be undertaken by our new management team in 2005.

ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.


                                      -61-
<PAGE>

                                    PART III

ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE
        WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

      This information is incorporated by reference from our proxy statement to
be filed with the Commission in connection with our Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.

      Code of Ethics

      We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our board of directors,
chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controller and any other
individual serving in similar capacities. The Code of Ethics is designed to
serve as the foundation of our standards of behavior and to promote honest and
ethical conduct, proper disclosure of financial information in our periodic
reports, and compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations by our
directors and senior officers who have operating and financial responsibilities.

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

      This information is incorporated by reference from our proxy statement to
be filed with the Commission in connection with our Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.

ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
         RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

      This information is incorporated by reference from our proxy statement to
be filed with the Commission in connection with our Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

      This information is incorporated by reference from our proxy statement to
be filed with the Commission in connection with our Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.

ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

      (a)   Exhibits.

      See exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index following the signature page of
this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, which is incorporated herein by reference.

      (b)   Reports on Form 8-K.

      During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, Current Reports on Form
8-K were filed on the following dates: February 18, 2004, February 19, 2004,
March 26, 2004, May 10, 2004, May 14, 2004, May 27, 2004, August 9, 2004,
September 22, 2004, September 24, 2004, October 25, 2004, October 26, 2004,
November 15, 2004, December 1, 2004, December 7, 2004, December 9, 2004 and
December 20, 2004.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

      This information is incorporated by reference from our proxy statement to
be filed with the Commission in connection with our Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.


                                      -62-
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.

                                               VENDINGDATA CORPORATION


Date: December 7, 2005                         By:
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Mark R. Newburg,
                                                  Chief Executive Officer,
                                                  Principal Executive Officer

      In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Signature                                   Title                                Date
<S>                                 <C>                                            <C>

                                   Executive Director                              December 7, 2005
--------------------------------   (Chief Executive Officer)
Mark R. Newburg

                                   Chief Financial Officer                         December 7, 2005
--------------------------------   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Arnaldo F. Galassi

                                   Chairman of the Board                           December 7, 2005
--------------------------------
James E. Crabbe

                                   Director                                        December 7, 2005
--------------------------------
Ronald O. Keil

                                   Director                                        December 7, 2005
--------------------------------
Bob L. Smith

                                   Director                                        December 7, 2005
--------------------------------
Paul Harvey

                                   Director                                        December 7, 2005
--------------------------------
Vincent Devito

                                   Director                                        December 7, 2005
--------------------------------
Robert Miodonski
</TABLE>


                                      -63-
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number                              Exhibit Description
-------                             -------------------

3.1            Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated July 24,
               2000, incorporated by reference from the registrant's Current
               Report on Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2000.
3.2            Amended and Restated Bylaws of the registrant dated November 13,
               2002, incorporated by reference from the registrant's Current
               Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2003.
3.3            Certificate of Change in Number of Authorized Shares filed on
               December 23, 2002 and effective January 3, 2003, incorporated by
               reference from the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
               on January 8, 2003.
4.1            Specimen certificate for Common Stock, incorporated by reference
               from the registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed
               on July 16, 1997.
10.1           Shareholder Agreement dated December 14, 1998, by and between
               VendingData Corporation and Richard Huson, Bob Smith and Ron
               Keil, incorporated by reference from the registrant's Annual
               Report on Form 10-KSB filed on March 26, 1999.
10.2           Form of Warrant Associated with 9.5% Convertible Note Due 2004,
               incorporated by reference from the registrant's Quarterly Report
               on Form 10-QSB filed on May 17, 1999.
10.3           First Security Bank of Nevada Master Equipment Lease Agreement,
               incorporated by reference from the registrant's Quarterly Report
               on Form 10-QSB filed on August 13, 1999.
10.4           Lease Agreement dated August 19, 1999, by and between the
               registrant and Spencer Airport Center, LLC for 6830 Spencer
               incorporated by reference from the registrant's Quarterly Report
               on Form 10-QSB filed on November 15, 1999.
10.5           Durable Power of Attorney Granting Voting Rights of the
               registrant's Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
               registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on November
               15, 1999.
10.6           Employment Agreement of Steven J. Blad dated August 10, 1999,
               incorporated by reference from the registrant's Quarterly Report
               on Form 10-QSB filed on August 13, 1999.
10.7           Form of Employment Agreement, incorporated by reference from the
               registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on August 14,
               2001.
10.8           First Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between the
               registrant and Steven J. Blad entered into on November 20, 2001,
               incorporated by reference from the registrant's Annual Report on
               Form 10-KSB filed on April 1, 2002.
10.9           Form of Indemnification Agreement, incorporated by reference from
               the registrant's quarterly report on 10-QSB/A filed on August 19,
               2003.
10.10          Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by
               reference from the registrant's quarterly report on 10-QSB/A
               filed on August 19, 2003.
10.11          Form of First Amendment to Employment Agreement, incorporated by
               reference from the registrant's quarterly report on 10-QSB/A
               filed on August 19, 2003.
10.12          Second Amendment to Employment Agreement of Steven J. Blad,
               incorporated by reference from the registrant's quarterly report
               on 10-QSB/A filed on August 19, 2003.


                                      -64-
<PAGE>

10.13          Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation Warrant to Purchase 25,000
               Shares of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
               registrant's quarterly report on 10-QSB/A filed on August 19,
               2003.
10.14          Financial Advisor Agreement dated March 1, 2003, incorporated by
               reference from the registrant's registration statement on Form
               SB-2 filed on September 25, 2003.
10.15          Triage Capital Management LP Warrant to Purchase 50,000 Shares of
               Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the registrant's
               quarterly report on 10-QSB/A filed on August 19, 2003.
10.16          Mellon HBV SBV, LLC Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock,
               incorporated by reference from the registrant's quarterly report
               on 10-QSB/A filed on August 19, 2003.
10.17          Letter Agreement with Industrial Research Limited, incorporated
               by reference from the registrant's registration statement on Form
               SB-2/A filed on December 10, 2003.
10.18          Amended and Restated 1999 Directors' Stock Option Plan,
               incorporated by reference from the registrant's registration
               statement on Form S-8 filed on September 10, 2003.
10.19          Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and between the
               registrant and Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation, incorporated
               by reference from the registrant's registration statement on Form
               SB-2 filed on September 25, 2003.
10.20          Form of Amended Escrow Agreement by and between the registrant
               and Wells Fargo Bank, incorporated by reference from the
               registrant's registration statement on Form SB-2/A filed on
               December 10, 2003.
10.21          Form of Lock-up, incorporated by reference from the registrant's
               registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 25, 2003.
10.22          Acquisition Agreement dated June 26, 2001, by and between the
               registrant and Technology Development Center, LLC, incorporated
               by reference from the registrant's current report on Form 8-K
               filed on June 29, 2001.
10.23          Form of Subscription Agreement, incorporated by reference from
               the registrant's registration statement on Form SB-2/A filed on
               December 10, 2003.
10.24          Consulting Agreement dated December 31, 2002, by and between the
               registrant and John J. Gerard, incorporated by reference from the
               registrant's registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on
               September 25, 2003.
10.25          First Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated March 31, 2003 by
               and between registrant and John J. Gerard, incorporated by
               reference from the registrant's registration statement on Form
               SB-2 filed on September 25, 2003.
10.26          Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation warrant to Purchase 75,000
               Shares of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
               registrant's registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on
               September 25, 2003.
10.27          Distribution Agreement by and between the registrant and TCS Aces
               Pty Limited, incorporated by reference from the registrant's
               registration statement on Form SB-2/A filed on December 10, 2003.
10.28          Form of Placement Agent Agreement with Philadelphia Brokerage
               Corporation, incorporated by reference from the registrant's
               Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 15, 2005.


                                      -65-
<PAGE>

10.29          Form of Subscription Agreement for 15% Senior Secured Notes due
               February 2008, incorporated by reference from the registrant's
               Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 15, 2005.
10.30          Form of Promissory Note for 15% Senior Secured Notes due February
               2008, incorporated by reference from the registrant's Current
               Report on Form 8-K filed on February 15, 2005.
10.31          Distribution Agreement by and between the registrant and
               Technical Casino Supplies Ltd, incorporated by reference from the
               registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 15,
               2005.
10.32          Form of Subscription Agreement for 15% Senior Secured Notes due
               March 2008, incorporated by reference from the registrant's
               Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2005.
10.33          Form of Promissory Note for 15% Senior Secured Notes due March
               2008, incorporated by reference from the registrant's Current
               Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2005.
10.34          Form of Intercreditor Agreement, incorporated by reference from
               the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16,
               2005.
10.35          Form of Amended and Restated Security Agreement, incorporated by
               reference from the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
               on March 16, 2005.
10.36          Form of Amended and Restated Collateral Agent Agreement
               Agreement, incorporated by reference from the registrant's
               Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2005.
14.1           Code of Ethics, incorporated by reference from the registrant's
               annual report on 10KSB filed March 30, 2004.
21.1           Subsidiaries of Registrant.
31.1           Certification of Mark R. Newburg under Section 302 of the
               Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2           Certification of Arnaldo F. Galassi under Section 302 of the
               Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1           Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
               of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.


                                      -66-