alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George A. Blanton,
Sr. Vice  President,  Chief  Financial  Officer and  Treasurer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ George A. Blanton
---------------------------------------------------------
George A. Blanton
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date: May 8, 2009

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren,  Inc. and will be retained by Anaren,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       35
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 97-10273 Conference Calendar

__________________ ELBERT SILAS GREEN, Plaintiff, SAMUEL H. LESLIE, Intervenor-Plaintiff,

versus R. O. LAMPERT, Senior Warden, et al., Defendants,

JERRY LISBY, Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CV-12C

- - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1997 Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jerry Lisby, a Texas prisoner (# 766897), appeals from the denial of his motion to intervene in the captioned action. Lisby was not entitled to intervene “of right” in this action becauseNo. 97-10273 -2- he has not shown that his absence from the action would “impair or impede” his ability to protect his interests. F ED . R. C IV . P. 24(a). Inasmuch as Lisby sought “permissive” intervention under Rule 24(b), the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Lisby's motion. Kneeland v. National Collegiate Athletic
Ass'n , 806 F.2d 1285, 1289, (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction over Lisby's appeal, and the appeal is DISMISSED. Edwards v. City of Houston , 78 F.3d 983, 992 (5th Cir. 1996). APPEAL DISMISSED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4 6 00

_____________________________
N IC OLE M ARIE A LLEN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. Michael A. Flowers , Judge

. August 29, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , R OWE , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Nic ole Marie Allen , pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorne y General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
##### 



Re:
    
    Ground Lease dated as of August 1, 1960 (Ground Lease), by and between The Board of
Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (Lessor) and Clevite Corporation, covering
certain premises (the Premises) including that premises commonly known as 1801-1841 Page
Mill Road, Palo Alto, California, the current lessee under the Lease
being INTERVAL RESEARCH
CORPORATION, a Washington corporation (Lessee); and Sublease dated as of August 18, 1999 by
and between Page Mill Road Properties Inc., the predecessor-in-interest to Lessee and Incyte
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation, predecessor-in-interest to INCYTE CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation (Subtenant) for premises located at 1841 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto,
California, (Sublease Premises), and Subsublease dated August 9, 2004 (Subsublease), by and
between Subtenant and CONNETICS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (Subsubtenant), for
premises (Subsublease Premises) consisting of approximately 19,447 square feet and located
on the first and second floors of Building E, as described in the Subsublease and commonly
known as 1841 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California.
    n  Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA
94025  ph  650/926-0200




---



##### 








---



##### 



LESSOR:The Board of Trustees of theLeland Stanford Junior UniversityBy:
    
    Stanford Management CompanyBy:
    
    /s/ Jean SniderJean Snider
Managing Director, Stanford Research Park
    By:
    
    /s/ Adam HealeyIts:Title:
    
    Vice PresidentDated:
    
    3/15/05




---



##### 



By:
    
    /s/ David C. HastingsIts:
    
    EVP, CFOTitle:Dated:
    
    3/4/05
   By:
    
    /s/ John L. HigginsIts:
    
    CFOTitle:
    
    EVPDated:
    
    3/1/05
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         3,607
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         454,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                 64,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 415,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        229,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   415,578
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               85,271
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  26,269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18,439<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                17,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            17,583
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   17,583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.55
        

<FN>
<F1>
Depreciation and Amortization
</FN>


</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). tk/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R OB E R T WOOT E N, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. S T A T E O F C A L I F O RN I A ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 15560 D. C . No . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 3 1 1 - L KK J FM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L aw r e nc e K . K ar l t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 16, 2010 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R obe rtW oot e n appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng tha tthe de f e nda nt s vi ol a t e d hi s F i r s ta nd



# FI LED MA R 30 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALStk / Res ea r ch 09- 15560 2 T e nth A m e ndm e ntr i ght s byvi rtue of aC a l i f orni aS upr e m e C ourtde c i s i on l e g a l i z i n g s a me - s e x marr i a g e i n Ca l i f o rn i a . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 . W e rev i ew d e n o v o an o rd er g ran t i n g a m o t i o n t o d i sm i ss. Sa ck s v . O f f i ce of For e i gn A s s e t s C ontr ol , 466 F . 3d 764, 770 ( 9th C i r . 2006) . W e a f f i rm f orthe r e a s o n s s ta te db yth e d is tr ic t c o u rt. W e d o n o t c o n s id e rW o o te n ’s a r g u m e n ts r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. Se e B i as v . Moy ni han , 50 8 F . 3d 12 12 , 12 23 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). W o o te n ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . AF F I RME D.
No. 11-5199.

#### McQuirter *v.*Michigan Department of Corrections.

Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

TONY NIXON, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-10461 

D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00668-DCB-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 11, 2017**

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

Tony Nixon appeals his bench-trial conviction and 18-month sentence for 

one count of conspiracy to transport illegal aliens for the purpose of financial gain, 

in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I), (a)(1)(A)(ii), and (a)(1)(B)(i), and 

two counts of transportation of illegal aliens for profit, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 17 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-10461

§ 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (a)(1)(B)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, 

and we affirm.

Nixon contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. He 

has not shown that his counsel was constitutionally ineffective. See Strickland v. 

Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984) (to establish that counsel was

constitutionally ineffective, defendant must show that counsel performed 

deficiently and that “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s 

unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different”).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Executive Committee of the Federal Aviation 
Administration Rulemaking Advisory Committee.

DATE: The meeting will be held on February 9, 2000 at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Department of 
Transportation, 400 7th Street, SW, Rooms 6200-6204, Washington, DC 
20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regina Jones, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591, 
telephone (202) 267-9822; fax (202) 267-5075; e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#461423212f2827680c292823350620272768212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2a097959b9c93dcb89d9c9781b2949393dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Executive Committee to be held on 
February 9, 2000, at the Department of Transportation, 400 7th Street, 
SW, Rooms 6200-6204, Washington, DC 20590. The agenda will include:
    <bullet> Use of proxy votes
    <bullet> ARAC Chair
    <bullet> Aviation Consumer Action Project (ACAP) motions
    Attendance is open to the interested public but will be limited to 
the space available.
    The public must make arrangements by February 7, to present oral 
statements at the meeting. The public may present written statements to 
the executive committee at any time by providing 25 copies to the 
Executive Director, or by bringing the copies to the meeting.
    If you are in need of assistance or require a reasonable 
accommodation for this meeting, please contact the person listed under 
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 18, 2000.
Anthony F. Fazio,
Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 00-1649 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Gregory Donnell USRY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director, VDOC; Commonwealth of Virginia, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 04-6062.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 2004.

Decided March 19, 2004.

Gregory Donnell Usry, Appellant pro se. Steven Andrew Witmer, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*50PER CURIAM.

Gregory Donnell Usry seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Usry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50940

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LARRY DARNELL NUNEZ, also known as Laylow

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CR-146-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Darnell Nunez appeals following his guilty plea conviction for

possession with the intent to distribute crack cocaine. He argues that the

district court abused its discretion by sentencing him to an above-guidelines

sentence of 200 months of imprisonment. 

Following United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), sentences are

reviewed for reasonableness in light of the sentencing factors set forth in 18

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 4, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-50940

2

U.S.C. § 3553(a). United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519-20 (5th Cir. 2005).

Because Nunez does not challenge the procedural correctness of his sentence, see

United States v. Brantley, 537 F.3d 347, 349 (5th Cir. 2008), this court may

proceed to an examination of the substantive reasonableness of the sentence,

under an abuse-of-discretion standard. See Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586,

596-97 (2007); United States v. Williams, 517 F.3d 801, 809 (5th Cir. 2008). 

Contrary to Nunez’s assertions, his prior offenses were serious in nature

and, as noted by the district court, represented an obvious and lengthy

disrespect for the law. The offense of conviction also was serious, as it involved

11 distributions of significant amounts of crack cocaine, which ended only with

Nunez’s arrest. Moreover, although Nunez claims that the advisory sentencing

range set forth by the Sentencing Guidelines for the crack offense was greater

than necessary, he has failed to show that the range has been declared invalid

by this or any other court. Because the district court considered the § 3553(a)

factors and gave sufficient reasons for its decision to impose a nonguidelines

sentence, Nunez’s sentence is not substantively unreasonable and is

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ARTISTIC
GREETINGS INCORPORATED'S FORM 10-Q FOR ITS QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000007610
<NAME> ARTISTIC GREETINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                             245
<SECURITIES>                                     1,863
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,033     
<ALLOWANCES>                                        75 
<INVENTORY>                                      2,983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,167
<PP&E>                                          29,420     
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,330     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,264
<BONDS>                                          5,022<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           654
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,261
<SALES>                                         70,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,703
<CGS>                                           30,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,742
<INCOME-TAX>                                       426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,316
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,316
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
<FN>
<F1>Long-term debt.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-25-1997
<CASH>                                           18748
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    43964
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     585239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                665636
<PP&E>                                          124123
<DEPRECIATION>                                   41778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  754570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           542705
<BONDS>                                          35303
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                      119515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    754570
<SALES>                                         527573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                534325
<CGS>                                           379342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   379342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                145887
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5336
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1817
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3519
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3519
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>