August 11, 2015

Exemption No. 12423

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–2265

Mr. Courtney R. Bateman

Reed Smith LLP

Counsel for Talon Aerolytics LLC

1301 K Street, NW.

Suite 1100 East Tower

Washington, DC 20005–3373

Dear Mr. Bateman:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

By letter dated May 26, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Talon Aerolytics LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an exemption. The 

petitioner requested to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial data 

collection.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and 

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Phantom 3, DJI Phantom 2, DJI Inspire 1, 

DJI S1000 +, and Aeryon SkyRanger.
2

In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in 

reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited 

operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation 

has determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA 

finds that relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, 

Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing 

requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection1. The FAA has issued grants of 

exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. 

In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 

11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see

Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. 

FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned 

aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or 

crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in 

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled 

by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and 

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, 

delegated to me by the Administrator, Talon Aerolytics LLC is granted an exemption from 

14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 

91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to 

the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. 

This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

 

1 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. 

Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF 

analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (particulate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by 

instruments aboard the UA.
3

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Talon Aerolytics LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom 3, 

DJI Phantom 2, DJI Inspire 1, DJI S1000 +, and Aeryon SkyRanger when weighing 

less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will 

require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are 

not permitted. 

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The 

exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine 

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at 

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the 

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or 

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS 

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; 

electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC 

must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the 

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties 

required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its 

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of 

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating 

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the 

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 
4

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the 

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The 

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension 

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update 

or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then 

the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s 

UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding 

updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g., replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo 

a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. 

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at 

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such 

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is 

in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the 

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all 

potential discrepancies, e.g., inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and 

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a 

state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 

government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.
5

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the 

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs 

(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated 

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for 

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as 

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption 

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the 

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve 

power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The 

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct 

operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.
6

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification 

(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and 

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. 

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure 

that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises 

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of 

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety 

of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered 

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.
7

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and 

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) 

as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this 

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day 

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities 

must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted 

under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of 

the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners 

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those 

who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, 

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes 

essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons 

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the 

exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS 

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, 

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.
8

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures
Reed Smith 

Courtney R. Bateman 

Direct Phone: +1 202 414 9265 

Email: CBateman@reedsmith.com 

May 26, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Reed Smith LLP 

1301 K Street, N.W. 

Suite 1100 - East Tower 

Washington, D.C. 20005-3373 

Tel +1 202 414 9200 

Fax +1 202 414 9299 

reedsmith.com 

Re: Talon Aerolytics' Request for Exemption from Certain Regulations per Section 333 ofthe FAA 

Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 

C.F.R. Part 11 , Talon Aerolytics LLC ("Talon Aerolytics") hereby applies for an exemption from the 

listed Federal Aviation Regulations ("F ARs") to allow business use (commercial operation) of its 

sUASs, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as 

may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333. 

I. INTRODUCTION 

Talon Aerolytics seeks to operate sUASs for aerial data collection. In support of its application, Talon 

Aerolytics submits confidentially a Flight Operations Manual and flight manuals for the DJI Phantom 

3, DJI Phantom 2, DJI Inspire 1, DJI S1000+, and Aeryon SkyRanger. To the extent anything in this 

letter conflicts with the Flight Operations Manual or flight manuals, those documents control. 

Specific Regulations for which an exemption is sought: 

14CFR61.113 (a) 

14 CFR 91.7(a) 

14 CFR 91.119(b) & (c) 

14 CFR 91.121 

14 CFR 91.151 (a) 

14 CFR 91.405 (a) 

14 CFR 407 (a) (1) 

14 CFR 409 (a) (1) & (2) 

14 CFR 417 (a) & (b) 

NEW YORK + LONDON • HONG KONG + CHICAGO • WASHINGTON, D.C. • BEIJING • PARIS • LOS ANGELES • SAN FRANCISCO • PHILADELPHIA • SHANGHAI • PITISBURGH + HOUSTON 

SINGAPORE + MUNICH +ABU DHABI +PRINCETON • NORTHERN VIRGINIA • WILMINGTON • SIUCON VALLEY • DUBAI • CENTURY CITY • RICHMOND • ATHENS +KAZAKHSTAN 

US_ACTIVE·122103002.1·CRBATEMA0512612015 1:53PM 
May 26,2015 

Page2 

Reed Smith 

II. TALON AEROL YTICS'S OPERATIONS DO NOT POSE SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS 

The sUAS's utilized by Talon Aerolytics are electric multi-rotor craft, weighing less than 55 lbs. 

including payload. They operate at a speed of no more than 80 mph (29 knots) and have the 

capability to hover, and/or move in a vertical and horizontal plane simultaneously. They will only be 

operated as visual line of sight (VLOS), remain under 400 ft. above ground level, or no more than 50 

ft. , above the structure being inspected, if that structure exceeds 400ft. The sUASs will operate only 

with permission of involved property owners and/or local government officials. 

During the proposed data collection operations, the site will be secured, and non-participants will be 

kept at least 500 feet away from the operation, unless barriers or structures are present that 

sufficiently protect non-participants from debris in the event of an accident. 

Talon Aerolytics has drafted, and submits confidentially, a Flight Operations Manual whjch discusses 

safety considerations, training and general operating procedures for the proposed operations. Talon 

Aerolytics has also drafted, and submits confidentially, sUAS Aircraft Flight Manuals which set forth 

the specifications, inspection and setup of the sUASs intended for use in the proposed operations. 

III. TALON AEROL YTICS' PROPOSED OPERATIONS ARE IN THE PUBLIC 

INTEREST 

The FAA recently issued a Grant ofExemption to FalconSkyCam for operations that are substantially 

similar to those proposed herein. Docket No. F AA-20 14-0884 (used March 6, 20 15). In issuing the 

Grant, the FAA noted that "[t]he enhanced safety and reduced environmental impact achieved using a 

UAS with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather 

than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable 

fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the 

public interest." 

Accordingly, Talon Aerolytics respectfully requests that the FAA grant the requested exemption 

without delay. 

IV. EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY 

Talon Aerolytics proposes that the exemption requested herein apply to civil aircraft that have the 

characteristics and operate with the limitations listed herein. These limitations, as listed below, provide 

for at least an equivalent or even higher level of safety to operations under the current regulatory 

structure. 
May 26,2015 

Page 3 

Reed Smith 

These limitations and conditions to which Talon Aerolytics agrees to be bound when conducting 

commercial operations under an FAA issued exemption include: 

The sUASs utilized by Talon Aerolytics will weigh less than 55 lbs. 

Flights will be operated during daylight hours, in visual meteorological conditions, and within 

visual line of sight (VLOS) ofthe pilot of the sUAS. 

All operations will utilize a visual observer in addition to the operator. 

Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be approximately 30 minutes, or when 

the sUAS reaches 25% battery power. 

As noted, non-participants will be kept at least 500 feet away from the operation, unless barriers or 

structures are present that sufficiently protect non-participants from debris in the event of an accident. 

V. EXEMPTIONS REQUESTED 

14 C.F.R. § 61.113(a) and (b): Private vs. Commercial Pilot Certificates 

Sections 61.113(a) and (b) prohibit non-commercially rated pilots from operating an aircraft for 

compensation or hire. Talon Aerolytics proposes that its pilots will have at least a sport or recreational 

pilot's certificate, and a medical certificate. Its operations will be limited to controlled areas as 

reflected in Talon Aerolytics' Flight Operations Manual. For the reasons set forth in the FAA's grant 

of an exemption to Astraeus Aerial, Talon Aerolytics does not believe a commercial pilot certificate is 

necessary for the operations it· intends to conduct. See, e.g., In the matter of the petition of Astraeus 

Aerial, Exemption No. 11062 (issued Sept. 25, 2014). For those reasons, Talon Aerolytics requests an 

exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 61.1 13(a) and (b). 

14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness 

Section 91.7 prohibits operation of an unairworthy aircraft, and places responsibility for airworthiness 

determinations on the pilot in command. The sUASs will not have an airworthiness certificate, and 

there is no FAA regulatory standard for determining airworthiness ofthe sUASs. Additionally, Talon 

Aerolytics' operating documents set forth inspection and maintenance procedures to ensure 

airworthiness. For these reasons, and in accordance with the FAA's grant of an exemption from 91.7 

to Total Safety U.S., Inc., Talon Aerolytics requests an exemption from 14 CFR. § 91.7(a). See, e.g., 

In the matter of the petition ofTotal Safety U.S., Inc., Exemption No. 111 56 (issued Jan. 29, 2015). 
May 26,2015 

Page4 

14 C.F.R. §91.119(b) and (c): Minimum Safe Altitudes 

Reed Smith 

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119(b) prohibits 

aircraft in congested areas from flying less than 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal 

radius of2,000 feet of the aircraft. To the extent that the structures that Talon Aerolytics wouJd be 

inspecting are considered to be in "congested areas,''1 Talon Aerolytics' operational procedures, and the 

size, weight and speed of the sUAS, provide an equivalent level of safety such that operations at lower 

altitudes should be allowed. 

As described in its Flight Operations Manual, Talon Aerolytics will establish a 500' buffer/sterile area 

for its operations that will exclude personnel not associated with the operations. Talon Aerolytics will 

also exercise additional control over the sterile area as needed, as set forth in the Manual. Consequently, 

Talon Aerolytics believes these procedures will reduce or eliminate any potential adverse impacts to 

safety for operations in congested areas. Talon Aerolytics therefore requests an exemption from 14 CFR 

§ 91.119(b). 

Section 91.119 (c) prohibits operations in other than congested areas below 500 feet above the surface, 

or closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle or structure. As this exemption is for sUASs that 

fly similarly to a helicopter and the exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 400ft AGL 

(or no more than 50ft above the structure being inspected, if taller than 400ft.) , an exemption may be 

needed to allow such operations. 

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the UAS as well as the 

location where it is operated. As discussed above, Talon Aerolytics' Flight Operations Manual 

provides for establishment of a sterile area, included safety buffers of 500 feet for personnel not 

assoc iated with the operation. A 100 foot safety buffer will be in place for authorized personnel 

associated with the operation, unless the PIC determines a reduced buffer is essential to the current 

operation. Talon Aerolytics therefore requests an exemption from Section 91.119( c) for all authorized 

personnel associated with the operation. 

14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings 

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to 

an altimeter that is set " ... to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting 

available before departure." As the sUASs may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS 

altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. 

1 The FAA Office of the Chief Counsel has indicated that whether an area is "congested" is determined on a case-by-case 

basis. See, e.g., June 18, 20 12, Memorandum from Rebecca B. MacPherson, Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations, to 

James E. Gardner, Manager, Flight Standards Division, re "To what extent an operator can make a congested area 

uncongested." 
May 26,2015 

Page 5 

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions 

Reed Smith 

Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning "a flight in an airplane under VFR 

conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the 

first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed- (1) During the day, to fly after 

that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes." 

Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be approximately 30 minutes. Flights will be 

safely landed when the battery falls below its nominal voltage, should that occur prior to completion 

of the operation. The sUASs Talon Aerolytics proposes to use all have a Low Voltage Warning which 

alerts when the battery reaches pre-determined levels. This battery level would be more than adequate 

to return the sUAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area when the 

Low Voltage Warning alerts. 

For these reasons, Talon Aerolytics requests an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91. 15 l(a). Similar 

exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 5745, 10673, and 

10808. 

14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (1) & (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections 

These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner "shall have that aircraft inspected as 

prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in 

paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter ... ," 

and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43. 

As provided in Talon Aerolytics' Operations Manual, the operator will ensure that the UAS is in 

working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance and inspections, and keep a log 

of any maintenance performed. 

VI. REGULATIONS FOR WinCH EXEMPTIONS ARE UNNECESSARY 

The Federal Aviation Administration just issued a number of exemptions for UAS operations in filming 

of movies. In those exemptions, the agency noted that exemptions from certain regulations were not 

necessary, due to " the size, weight, speed and limited operating area associated with [the UASs] and its 

operation." 

Based upon the FAA's guidance, and the fact that Talon Aerolytics sUASs are similar in size or smaller 

than those proposed by the film-making industry, Talon Aerolytics believes exemptions from the 

following regulations are not necessary: 

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates 

14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft 
May 26, 2015 

Page 6 

14 C.F.R. §91.7(b): Civil aircraft airworthiness. 

14 C.F.R. §91.1 09: Flight instruction. 

Reed Smith 

Talon Aerolytics also believes that an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action, is not 

necessary. This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to 

insure the safety of flight. An FAA approved rotorcraft flight manual will not be provided for the 

aircraft. An equivalent level of safety will be provided as set forth in the operating documents 

submitted as part ofthis request. 

The FAA has previously found that adherence to procedures contained in an applicant's operating 

documents demonstrate compliance with§ 91.103, and therefore an exemption from the regulation 

was not necessary. See, e.g., In the matter of the petition ofTotaJ Safety U.S., Inc., Exemption No. 

11156 (issued Jan. 29, 2015). 

As detailed in its operating documents, Talon Aerolytics' PIC will take all actions including 

reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, landing and takeoff clearance distances and aircraft 

performance data before initiation of flight to ensure the safety of the flight. Consequently, in light 

of the agency's prior finding in Total Safety U.S., Inc., Talon Aerolytics does not believe an 

exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.103 is necessary. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11 , the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal 

Register, should it be determined that publication is needed: 

Talon Aerolytics LLC seeks an exemption from the following rules: 

14 C.F.R. § 61.] 13(a) and (b); 91.7 (a); 91.119(b) and (c); 91.121 ; 91.151(a); 91.405 

(a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (1) & (2) and 91.417 (a) & (b) to conduct aerial data collection. 

Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of sUASs for these operations will 

enhance safety by reducing risk. Conventional means for performing data collection on 

elevated structures and other property require ladders, ropes, aerial lifts, or using conventional 

helicopters operating at extremely low altitudes over the subject structure being photographed. 

These conventional means all pose risks to persons and property. 

In contrast, an sUAS weighing less than 55 lbs. and powered by batteries, e liminates virtually 

all of that risk given the reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. The 

sUAS is carried to the project site and not flown. The sUAS will carry no passengers or crew 

and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights, 

ground-based aerial lift (bucket truck) operations, or manual climbing and inspection 

operations. 

The operation of small UASs, weighing less than 55 lbs., conducted in the strict conditions 

outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the 
May 26,2015 

Page 7 

Reed Smith 

exemptions requested herein, including exempting Talon Aerolytics from the requirements of 

Part 21 and allowing commercial operations. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, 

and close to the ground, and, as a result, are far safer than conventional alternatives. 

Privacy 

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property owner's 

prior consent and knowledge. 

Satisfaction ofthe criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of2012--size, weight, speed, 

operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated areas and operation within visual line of sight 

and national security - provide more than adequate justification for the grant of the requested 

exemptions allowing commercial operation of Talon Aerolytics' sUASs to conduct aerial data collection. 

Sincerely, 

0 

Courtney R. Bateman 

Reed Smith LLP 

Counsel for Talon Aerolytics 

/Signed/ 

John McGraw 

John McGraw Aerospace Consulting 

Consultant to Talon Aerolytics 

CRB:lsj