alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Part C (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of the Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services (45 FR 67772-76, dated October 14, 1980, and corrected at 45 FR 69296, October 20, 1980, as amended most recently at 65 FR 30125-26, dated May 10, 2000) is amended to retitle the Office of Data Processing and Services (ODPS), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), to the Office of Information Technology and Services, and revise the functional statement.

Section C-B, Organization and Functions, is hereby amended as follows:

Delete the title and functional statement for the Office of Data Processing and Services (CS3) and insert the following:

*Office of Information Technology and Services (CS3).*                     (1) Participates in the development of policy, long-range plans and programs of the Center; (2) Directs, plans and coordinates the Information Services and Information Technology Infrastructure of the Center; (3) Provides IRM policy coordination for the Center and IRM procurement approval authority for software, hardware and systems contract support; (4) Provides liaison with other public and private health agencies, foundations and statistical agencies on Information Technology and electronic data dissemination activities; and (5) Serves as the focal point for advanced Information Technology infrastructure research activities for NCHS-wide systems and in that capacity represents NCHS in developing technology partnerships with other agencies both public and private.                

Dated: June 18, 2000.

Jeffrey P. Koplan,

Director.

[FR Doc. 00-16791  Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-18-M
#### THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR v. JERRY R. TILLETT

From North Carolina State Bar (15DHC7)

No. 208PA15

ORDER

On 28 January 2016, the Court denied review in the above-captioned case, which concerns the authority of the North Carolina State Bar to initiate disciplinary proceedings against a sitting judge. Upon reconsideration, the Court, *ex mero motu,*deems the question presented by this case to be of such importance that the invocation of our supervisory jurisdiction is warranted. Accordingly, the Court now issues a writ of certiorari to review the question presented in defendant’s petition:

> Do the North Carolina State Bar Council and the Disciplinary Hearing Commission have the jurisdictional authority to discipline a judge of the General Court of Justice for conduct as a judge for which the judge has already been disciplined by the Judicial Standards Commission?

All other proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed pending full briefing by the parties in this Court and our determination of this question.

The Record is due on or before 10 June 2016. The briefing schedule is as provided by the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 27th day of May, 2016.

s/Ervin. J.

For the Court

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 27th day of May, 2016.

CHRISTIE S. CAMERON ROEDER Clerk of the Supreme Court

s/M.C. Hacknev Assistant Clerk
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 446

To grant a right of use and occupancy of a certain tract of land in Yosemite

National Park to George R. Lange and Lucille F. Lange, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. LEHMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To grant a right of use and occupancy of a certain tract

of land in Yosemite National Park to George R. Lange

and Lucille F. Lange, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GRANT OF RIGHT OF USE AND OCCUPANCY IN

4 YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the Sec6 retary of the Interior shall grant George R. Lange and

7 Lucille F. Lange a right of use and occupancy of the tract

8 numbered 16–118 in Foresta, Yosemite National Park,
2

•HR 446 IH

1 California, for a term ending at the death of George R.

2 Lange or the death of Lucille F. Lange, whichever is later.

3 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The right granted

4 pursuant to subsection (a)—

5 (1) shall be for such use and occupancy of the

6 property as the Secretary of the Interior determines

7 is reasonable;

8 (2) shall be subject to such terms and condi9 tions as the Secretary of the Interior determines are

10 necessary to ensure that the right does not unrea11 sonably diminish the scenic, natural, historic, and

12 other values for which Yosemite National Park was

13 established; and

14 (3) shall be conditioned on the payment by the

15 grantees of an annual fee that the Secretary of the

16 Interior determines is reasonable.

Æ
Decided February 23, 1909.

#### STATE *v.*COOK.

[99 Pac. 940.]

From Coos: James W. Hamilton, Judge.

W. T. Cook and David Clink were indicted, tried and convicted of gambling, and from the judgment and sentence which followed, the defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

Submitted on briefs under the proviso of Buie 16 of the Supreme Court. 50 Or. 580.

For appellants there was a brief over the names of *Messrs. Guerry & Hollister*and *Mr. Austin S. Hammond.*

For the State there was a brief over the name of *Mr. George M. Brown,*District Attorney.

Mr. Justice King

delivered the opinion of the court.

These defendants were tried in the circuit court under an indictment charging them with unlawfully playing a gambling game known as “Klondike,” and they, having been convicted and sentenced to pay a fine, appeal. The same legal problem is presented here as in *State*V. *Bay,*53 Or. 241 (99 Pac. 939), making an affirmance necessary; and it is so ordered. Affirmed.
No. 11-7200.

#### Portillo-Munoz *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 101.307 Tariffs, reports, and other material required to be submitted to the Commission.

Sections 1.771 through 1.815 of this chapter contain summaries of certain materials and reports, including schedule of charges and accounting and financial reports, which, when applicable, must be filed with the Commission.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ID-933-1430-01; IDI-15518, IDI 15557]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Public land order. 

# SUMMARY:

This order partially revokes two Secretarial orders insofar as they affect 7.5 acres of land withdrawn for use by the Bureau of Reclamation for the Minidoka Reclamation Project. The land is no longer needed for the purpose for which it was withdrawn. The land has been conveyed out of Federal ownership pursuant to Public Law 105-351. This action is for record clearing purposes only. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 29, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jackie Simmons, BLM Idaho State Office, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709, 208-373-3867. 

By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows: 

1. Secretarial Orders dated September 27, 1909 and August 12, 1912, which withdrew public land for the Minidoka Reclamation Project, are hereby revoked insofar as they affect the following described land: 

## Boise Meridian 

T. 10 S., R. 25 E., 

                            Sec. 30, S                            1/2                            S                            1/2                            SW                            1/4                            NE                            1/4                            NW                            1/4                             and N                            1/2                            NW                            1/4                            SE                            1/4                            NW                            1/4                            .                        

The area described aggregates 7.5 acres in Cassia County. 

      ( print page 40124)    
Dated: June 2, 2000.

Sylvia V. Baca,

Assistant Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 00-16459 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
794 A.2d 179

#### ANNABELLE CRIPPEN, ETC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. CENTRAL JERSEY CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

March 6, 2002.

Petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration in the light of *Laidlow v. Hariton Machinery Co.,*170 *N.J.*602, 790 A.2d 884 (2002).
No. 11-5310.

#### Hinojos *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist., Div. 1. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.745 Additional statements.

The applicant may be required to submit such additional documents and written statements of fact, signed and verified (or affirmed), as in the judgment of the Commission (or the presiding officer, if the application has been designated for hearing) may be necessary. Any additional documents and written statements of fact required in connection with applications under Title II of the Communications Act need not be verified (or affirmed).

[29 FR 6444, May 16, 1964]
RISK FACTORS

RECENT LOSSES; POTENTIAL FLUCTUATIONS IN OPERATING RESULTS

Although  the  Company  has  for  many  years  experienced year-to-year revenue
growth, it incurred net losses of $9.9 million and  $.4  million  in  1995  and
1994,  respectively.   There  can  be  no  assurance  that  revenue growth will
continue  or  that  the Company will continue to achieve profitability  in  the
future.

The Company's operating  results  have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate
in the future as a result of a variety of factors, some of which are outside of
the Company's control, including general economic conditions, specific economic
conditions in the retail trade industry,  the mix of products sold and the cost
and types of advertising through which they  are  sold,  and  prices charged by
suppliers, among others.

DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL

The  Company's  success  depends  to  a  significant degree upon the  continued
contributions of its core management team.   While  the  Company has employment
agreements  with  its  three  key executives, they still have  the  ability  to
voluntarily terminate their employment  with the Company at any time, as do the
Company's other executives and employees.   Competition for qualified personnel
in the Company's segment of the retail trade  industry  is  relatively  intense
and, from time to time, there are a limited number of persons with knowledge of
and  experience in particular sectors of the Company's business.  The Company's
success  also  will  depend  on  its  ability  to  attract and retain qualified
management, marketing, technical and other executives  and personnel.  The loss
of  the  services  of  key  personnel,  or the inability to attract  additional
qualified personnel, could have a material  adverse  effect  on  the  Company's
results of operations, development efforts and ability to expand.  There can be
no  assurance  that  the Company will be successful in attracting and retaining
such executives and personnel.

POTENTIAL VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICE

The market price of the  Company's Common Stock has been and may continue to be
highly volatile.  See the  discussion  under  Item 5 of the Company's 1996 Form
10-K  Report, "Market for Registrant's Common Equity  and  Related  Stockholder
Matters".   Factors  such  as variations in the Company's revenue, earnings and
cash flow, the difference between  the Company's actual results and the results
expected by investors and analysts, and announcements of new product offerings,
marketing plans or price reductions  by  the  Company  or its competitors could
cause the market price of the Company's Common Stock to fluctuate.

CONTROL BY PRESENT STOCKHOLDERS

In  the  aggregate,  Stuart  Komer  and American Greetings Corporation  control
approximately  48%  of  the  Company's issued  and  outstanding  Common  Stock.
Accordingly, to the extent these  stockholders  act  together  in the voting of
their shares, they will have the ability to significantly influence the outcome
of matters put before the Company's stockholders.
1832 

1833 

1834 

1835 

1836 

1837 

1838 

1839 

1840 

1841 

1842 

1843 

1844 

1845 

1846 

1847 

1848 

1849 

1850 

1851 

1852 

1853 

1854 

1855 

1856 

1857 

1858 

1859 

1860 

1861 

1862 

1863 

1864 

1865 

1866 

1867 

1868 

1869 

1870 

1871 

1872 

1873 

1874 

1875 

1876 

1877 

1878 

1879 

1880 

1881 

1882 

1883 

1884 

1885 

1886 

1887 

1888 

1889 

1890 

1891 

1892 

1893 

1894 

1895 

1896 

1897 

1898 

1899 

1900 

1901 

1902 

1903 

1904 

1905 

1906 

1907 

1908 

1909 

1910 

1911 

1912 

1913 

1914 

1915 

1916 

1917 

1918 

1919 

1920 

1921 

1922 

1923 

1924 

1925 

1926 

1927 

1928 

1929 

1930 

1931 

1932 

1933 

1934 

1935 

1936 

1937 

1938 

1939 

1940 

1941 

1942 

1943 

1944 

1945 

1946 

1947 

1948 

1949 

1950 

1951 

1952 

1953 

1954 

1955 

1956 

1957 

1958 

1959 

1960 

1961 

1962 

1963 

1964 

1965 

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:23:52-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### § 302-3.415 How long may my agency pay for extended storage of household goods?

Your agency may pay for extended storage of household goods for the duration of your TCS.
13 April 2016

083P04-2

#### State v. Philip Ray Dawkins

1. Defs Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA (COAP14-945)

1. Dismissed

2. Def’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court Stanly County

2. Dismissed

3. Def’s Motion to Hold Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*in Abeyance

3. Dismissed as moot
Exhibit










Exhibit 10.12 


Summary of Directors’ Compensation
NewMarket Corporation (the “Company”) pays the following quarterly fees for non-employee committee membership: 
	
				
	Audit Committee Member
	$
	1,250
	


	Audit Committee Chairman
	4,375
	


	Compensation Committee Chairman
	3,125
	


	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman
	2,500
	





The Company pays each of its non-employee directors a quarterly fee of $20,000. In addition to this amount, the Company pays the Lead Director a quarterly fee of $6,250. The Company does not pay employee members of the Board of Directors separately for their service on the Board of Directors or its committees. 
Any director who was elected to the Board of Directors on or before February 23, 1995 and who retires from the Board of Directors will receive $12,000 per year for life after age 60. The $12,000 is payable in quarterly installments. The retirement payments to former directors may be discontinued under certain circumstances. 
Under the 2014 Incentive Compensation and Stock Plan (the “Plan”), each non-employee director is awarded on each July 1 that number of whole shares of the Company’s common stock that, when multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the immediately preceding business day equals as nearly as possible but does not exceed $60,000. The shares of the Company’s common stock awarded under the Plan are nonforfeitable and the recipient directors immediately and fully vest in shares of the Company’s common stock issued under the Plan. Subject only to such limitations on transfer as may be specified by applicable securities laws, directors may sell their shares under the Plan at any time.
No. 11-9598.

#### Rodriguez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for Anaren Microwave, Inc. filed with Form 10-Q for the six
months ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JUN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            6,068,059
<SECURITIES>                                     22,884,392
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8,623,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                         13,000
<INVENTORY>                                       8,400,869
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 46,595,854
<PP&E>                                           36,506,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (26,687,087)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   62,569,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,375,776
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             66,247
<OTHER-SE>                                       56,332,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     62,569,094
<SALES>                                          25,735,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 25,735,239
<CGS>                                            15,443,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    21,002,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   20,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5,650,664
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,978,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3,672,664
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3,672,664
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.62





</TABLE>
131P16

#### State v. Somchoi Noonsob

1. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Appropriate ReliefRelease (COAP16-103)

1. Denied 04/13/2016

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed 04/13/2016
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: September 16, 2014

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Ray Saracino, EPA Region 9

SUBJECT: September 15, 2014 Meeting with Northwest Public Power Association 

(NWPPA) Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on September 15, 2014

to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014 and published in the Federal Register on 

June 18, 2014.

ATTENDEES

External Stakeholders

There were approximately 35-40 people in attendance representing public power organizations. 

A partial list of attendees is attached.

EPA 

Ray Saracino, EPA R9

Attachments
AMENDMENT #2 


 


TO THE $110,000 PROMISSORY NOTE DATED DECEMBER
14, 2016


 


The parties agree that the $110,000 Convertible
Promissory Note (the “Note”) by and between Liberty Star Uranium & Metals Corp. (the “Borrower”) and
Tangiers Investment Group, LLC (the “Lender”) is hereby amended as follows:


 





	1.	The
    Conversion Price. The provision in the Convertible Note pertaining to “Conversion Price” is hereby amended
    and restated in its entirety as set forth below:







 





“Conversion
Price” shall be equal to the lower of: a) 60% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock during the
20 consecutive Trading Days prior to the date on which Holder elects to convert all or part of the Note. If the Company is placed
on “chilled” status with the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), the discount shall be increased
by 5%, i.e. from 40% to 45%, until such chill is remedied. If the Company is not Deposits and Withdrawal at Custodian (“DWAC”)
eligible through their Transfer Agent and DTC’s Fast Automated Securities Transfer (“FAST”) system, the
discount will be increased by 5%, i.e., from 40% to 45%. In the case of both, the discount shall be a cumulative increase of 10%,
i.e., from 40% to 50%. Any default of this Note not remedied within the applicable cure period will result in a permanent additional
10% increase, i.e., from 40% to 50%, in addition to any other discount, as provided above, to the Conversion Price discount.


 





	2.	The
    Right of First Refusal. The provision in the Convertible Note pertaining to “Right of First Refusal” is hereby
    removed.







 


ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE NOTE
REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.


 


Please indicate acceptance and approval of
this amendment dated February 2, 2017 by signing below:


 


	 	 	 
	Liberty Star Uranium & Metals Corp.	 	Tangiers Investment Group, LLC
	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	By:	Robert Papiri
	 	 	 	 
	Its: 	 	Its:	Managing Member