alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50813

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GUSTAVO ADOLFO PAXTOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-121-ALL-LY

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gustavo Adolfo

Paxtor raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 60-1.41 Solicitations or advertisements for employees. In solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of a prime contractor or subcontractor, the requirements of paragraph (2) of the equal opportunity clause in § 60-1.4 shall be satisfied whenever the prime contractor or subcontractor complies with any of the following: ( a ) States expressly in the solicitations or advertising that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin;
( b ) Uses display or other advertising, and the advertising includes an appropriate insignia prescribed by the Director. The use of the insignia is considered subject to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 701;
( c ) Uses a single advertisement, and the advertisement is grouped with other advertisements under a caption which clearly states that all employers in the group assure all qualified applicants equal consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin;
( d ) Uses a single advertisement in which appears in clearly distinguishable type the phrase “an equal opportunity employer.”
[43 FR 49240, Oct. 20, 1978, as amended at 62 FR 66971, Dec. 22, 1997; 79 FR 72994, Dec. 9, 2014]
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Celulosa Arauco y Constitución S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2012



/s/ Matías DomeykoName:  Matías DomeykoTitle:    Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 30, 2012



/s/ Robinson TajmuchName:  Robinson TajmuchTitle:    Comptroller Director
# Comments on: New Process for Notifying Counsel of Accepted Scheduling Conflicts
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS - EXHIBIT 23.1
            --------------------------------------------------------

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31914, File
No. 333-33312, File No. 333-67589, File No. 333-10253 and File No. 333-3388),
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-37586 and File No. 333-46813)
and Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-53899).

                                               /S/ Arthur Andersen LLP

San Francisco, California
March 21, 2002

                                       53
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 136 (Friday, July 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41826-41827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17929]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of additional meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meeting of the Humanities Panel will be held at the Old Post 
Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael P. McDonald, Advisory 
Committee Management Officer, National Endowment for the Humanities, 
Washington, DC 20506; telephone (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter may be obtained 
by contacting the Endowment's TDD terminal on (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed meeting is for the purpose of 
panel review, discussion, evaluation and recommendation on applications 
for financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and 
the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including discussion of 
information

[[Page 41827]]

given in confidence to the agency by the grant applicants. Because the 
proposed meeting will consider information that is likely to disclose 
trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a 
person and privileged or confidential and/or information of a personal 
nature the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 
invasion of personal privacy, pursuant to authority granted me by the 
Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee 
meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have determined that the meeting will 
be closed to the public pursuant to subsections (c)(4), and (6) of 
section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    1. Date: July 25, 2011.
    Time: 1 to 3 p.m.
    Location: Room 430.
    Program: This meeting, which will be by teleconference, will review 
applications for the NEH on the Road Cooperative Agreement, submitted 
to the Division of Pubic Programs at the July 6, 2011 deadline.

Michael P. McDonald,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-17929 Filed 7-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
#### JOSEPH FOXELL and THOMAS JONES, Respondents, *v.*GEORGE *W.*FLETCHER, Appellant.

*Extension of time of payment of debt*— vacates *a prior order of a/rresi.*

Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order of arrest.

The order was granted January 2, 1877, on an affidavit showing that an action was about to be commenced for commissions received by the defendant, which he had fraudulently neglected to pay over to the plaintiffs. On the fifth of January, one Jones entered into an agreement with the plaintiffs, by which he transferred to them certain real estate in consideration that the defendant should have thirty-eight months to pay the amount of his indebtedness, the conveyance being made to insure the payment of the debt. The agreement also contained a provision for the payment of twenty-five dollars monthly, but whether this was obligatory upon, or optional with, the defendant, was disputed. The defendant having failed to pay any thing under the agreement, the plaintiffs caused his arrest under the original order, on March 26, 1877.

The court at General Term said: “ The conveyance from Andrews, whether absolute or as security, was a good consideration for the plaintiffs’ agreement. And whether that agreement be construed as an unqualified extension for thirty-eight months, or as an extension, contingent on the prompt payment of the installments, in either case ■there was an extension of the time, as' the plaintiffs themselves admit, for one month at the least. For one month, therefore, at the least, the plaintiffs had no cause of action on which they could sue. It seems to us, then, that an order of arrest, granted before this *644extension, onglit not to be in force, after the plaintiffs’ right of action had thus been suspended. Nor should it be again in force after the suspension of the right of action had expired. The suspension was more than a stay of proceedings in an action.

We do not say that a new order of arrest might not be granted, if the suspension has expired, or when it shall expire.”

*lioss dk*Jones, for the appellant. *Uem'ij A.*Merritt, for the respondents.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present- — Learned, P. J\, Bookes and Boardman, JJ".

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, printing and disbursements; and motion granted, with ten dollars costs; plaintiffs to have leave to offset those costs, etc., against their claim.
792 A.2d 1207

#### IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES H. MCAULIFFE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

April 3, 2001.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-078 concluding that CHARLES H. McAULIFFE of CHESTER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*8.4(b) (criminal act that reflects adversely on respondent’s trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHARLES H. McAULIFFE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
The use of facsimile signatures and seals on Customs bonds by the                     Start Printed Page 4017                    following corporate sureties has been approved effective this date: Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Hartford Fire Insurance Company.                

Authorized facsimile signature on file for: James M. Gorman, Attorney-in-fact. 

The corporate sureties have provided the Customs Service with a copy of the signature to be used, copies of the corporate seals, and certified copies of the corporate resolutions agreeing to be bound by the facsimile signatures and seals. This approval is without prejudice to the sureties' right to affix signatures and seals manually.

Dated: January 19, 2000. 

Jerry Laderberg, 

Chief, Entry Procedures and Carriers Branch. 

[FR Doc. 00-1683 Filed 1-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
Exhibit 31.2



Rule 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATION



I, Harry V. Maccarrone, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of COMFORCE Corporation, hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 11, 2004



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Harry V. Maccarrone                             
|Harry V. Maccarrone                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-5074.

#### Kemppainen *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 

### 2021 KW 1504 VERSUS KIM R. HOGAN JANUARY 31, 

### 2022 In Re: Kim R. Hogan, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 

### 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

### Tammany, No. 

### 387, 357. BEFORE: McDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED AS MOOT. The record of the Clerk of Court of St. 

## Tammany Parish reflects the 

### district court 

### denied relator' s 

### application for postconviction relief on December 10, 2021. JMM WIL EW



### COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### § 301-71.2 What are the standard data elements and when must they be captured on a travel accounting system?

The data elements are listed in appendix C of this chapter and must be on any travel claim form authorized for use by your employees.
# Comments on: 22-1013: In Re SOLAS OLED LTD. [ORDER], Nonprecedential
No. 11-5114.

#### McKinney *v.*Florida Department of Corrections et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

99–006 

" ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

111TH CONGRESS

2d Session 

REPORT

2010

111–690 

House Calendar No. 257 

IN THE MATTER OF NICOLE GUSTAFSON 

R E P O R T 

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF 

OFFICIAL CONDUCT 

DECEMBER 17, 2010.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with HEARING
(III)

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT, 

Washington, DC, December 17, 2010. 

Hon. LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk, House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MS. MILLER: In accordance with Rule 18(e)(2) of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, the Committee hereby 

submits the attached report to the House of Representatives. 

Sincerely, 

ZOE LOFGREN, 

Chair. 

JO BONNER, 

Ranking Republican 

Member. 


sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with HEARING

sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with HEARING
111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–690 

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT 

IN THE MATTER OF NICOLE GUSTAFSON 

DECEMBER 17, 2010 

Ms. LOFGREN, from the Committee on Standards of Official 

Conduct, submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

I. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION 

In accordance with Rule 18(e)(2) of the Committee on Standards 

of Official Conduct, the Committee hereby submits the following 

Report to the House of Representatives: 

On September 15, 2010, the Committee convened for the purpose 

of considering the charges issued against Nicole M. Gustafson on 

May 26, 2010, of operating while impaired, driving under the influence—1st offense, and driving while intoxicated—1st offense. Ms. 

Gustafson entered a plea of guilty to operating while impaired on 

July 21, 2010, and was sentenced to a 30-day suspended sentence 

and placed on supervised probation for one year. Ms. Gustafson 

was also fined $400.00 and required to complete a traffic alcohol 

program, victim impact panel, alcohol treatment, and alcohol testing. Ms. Gustafson intends to pay the $400.00 fine and is complying with the terms of her sentence. All other charges were dismissed pursuant to the plea agreement. 

The Committee voted against empanelling an investigative subcommittee regarding this matter. The Committee considered the 

scope and nature of Ms. Gustafson’s conduct, and the fine and 

criminal disposition ordered by the D.C. Superior Court. The Committee has determined not to initiate review by an investigative 

subcommittee in this matter. 


sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with HEARING
2 

II. STATEMENT UNDER RULE 13, CLAUSE 3(c) OF THE 

RULES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

The Committee made no special oversight findings in this report. 

No budget statement is submitted. No funding is authorized by any 

measure in this report. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with HEARING
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of AMERCO (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Shoen, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







AMERCO,





a Nevada corporation





/s/ Edward J. Shoen





Edward J. Shoen


President and Chairman of the Board


Date:  August 4, 2010
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.8004 Penalty for Failure to Provide the FRN. ( a ) Electronic filing systems for filings that require the FRN will not accept a filing without the appropriate FRN. If a party seeks to make an electronic filing and does not have an FRN, the system will direct the party to the CORES website to obtain an FRN.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section or in other Commission rules, filings subject to the FRN requirement and submitted without an FRN will be returned or dismissed.
( c ) Where the Commission has not established a filing deadline for an application, a missing or invalid FRN on such an application may be corrected and the application resubmitted. Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section or in other Commission rules, the date that the resubmitted application is received by the Commission with a valid FRN will be considered the official filing date.
( d ) Except for the filing of tariff publications (*see* 47 CFR 61.1(b)) or as provided in other Commission rules, where the Commission has established a filing deadline for an application and that application may be filed on paper, a missing or invalid FRN on such an application may be corrected with ten (10) business days of notification to the filer by the Commission staff and, in the event of such timely correction, the original date of filing will be retained as the official filing date.
[66 FR 47895, Sept. 14, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 36818, May 28, 2002]
No. 11-954.

#### Bulldog Investors General Partnership et al. *v.*Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.
#### § 302-6.1 What are “temporary quarters subsistence expenses (TQSE)”?

*Temporary quarters subsistence expenses* or *TQSE* are subsistence expenses incurred by an employee and/or the employee's immediate family while occupying temporary quarters. TQSE does not include transportation expenses incurred during occupancy of temporary quarters (see § 302-6.20).
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated January 24, 2017, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-214676) of Smart Trust 292,
comprising Smart Trust, Defensive 50 Equities Trust, Series 10.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


January 24, 2017
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--CommerceNet Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 31, 2000, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), CommerceNet Consortium, Inc. has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership 
status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Wyzdom 
Solutions, Inc., San Francisco, CA; Woodside Labs, Inc., Redwood City, 
CA; Enigma, Inc., Burlington, MA; Electron Economy, Cupertino, CA; and 
RAM Consulting Services, Poolesville, MD have joined the Consortium as 
Portfolio members.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CommerceNet Consortium, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On June 13, 1994, CommerceNet Consortium, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on August 31, 1994 (59 FR 45012).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 4, 
2000. A notice has not yet been published in the Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-16476 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
No. 11-9199.

#### Fortson *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
793 A.2d 713

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. FRED NEULANDER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

February 6, 2002.

ORDER

Leave to appeal is granted.
No. 11-1086.

#### Jordan *v.*Unemployment Appeals Commission et al.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.