alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"23-1295: CLINICOMP INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. CERNER CORPORATION [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wZ4zpNZKwL\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-05-2023-23-1295-clinicomp-international-inc-v-cerner-corporation-order-23-1295-order-6-5-2023_2137132\/\">23-1295: CLINICOMP INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. CERNER CORPORATION [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-05-2023-23-1295-clinicomp-international-inc-v-cerner-corporation-order-23-1295-order-6-5-2023_2137132\/embed\/#?secret=wZ4zpNZKwL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“23-1295: CLINICOMP INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. CERNER CORPORATION [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"wZ4zpNZKwL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: CLINICOMP INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. CERNER CORPORATION [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 23-1295 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
(163) 

II. COMMITTEE ACTIONS AND FILINGS OF 

THE PARTIES PRIOR TO THE AUGUST 4, 

2010 HEARING ON PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS 

a. Discovery Matters 

ii. Depositions 
164 
165 
166 
167 
168 
169 
170 
171 
172 
173 
174 
175 
176 
177 
178 
179 
180 
181 
182 
183 
184 
185 
186 
187 
188 
189 
190 
191 
192 
193 
194 
195 
196 
197 
198 
199 
200 
201 
202 
203 
204 
205 
206 
207 
208 
209
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–26

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 409, FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1999

FEBRUARY 23, 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 75]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 75, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 409, the

‘‘Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act of

1999’’ under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general

debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Government Reform. The rule provides that each section of the bill shall be considered as read. The

rule authorizes the Chair to accord priority in recognition to Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional

Record. The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole to postpone votes during consideration of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote

follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Æ
376A15

#### Paramount RX, Inc. v. Robert E. Duggan and Agelity, Inc.

Pit’s Motion to Stay tire Appeal

Allowed 12/21/2015
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 12-10371 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20753-PAS-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EARL SILAS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

 Appeals from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(February 5, 2013)

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 12-10371 Date Filed: 02/05/2013 Page: 1 of 3 
The Government appeals the district court’s resentencing of Earl Silas, Jr.,

pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a). The Government argues

the district court lacked jurisdiction to resentence Silas because the resentencing

was conducted more than 14 days after the original oral sentence was announced.

Under Rule 35, “[w]ithin 14 days after sentencing, the court may correct a

sentence that resulted from arithmetical, technical, or other clear error.” Fed. R.

Crim. P. 35(a). The word sentencing “means the oral announcement of the

sentence.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(c). We have held that the time limit of Rule 35(a)

is jurisdictional and that any modification outside of that time limit is a “legal

nullity.” United States v. Phillips, 597 F.3d 1190, 1196-97 (11th Cir. 2010)

(citing United States v. Diaz-Clark, 292 F.3d 1310, 1319 (11th Cir. 2002). If a

sentence is vacated within the time limit, but a new sentence is not imposed before

the time limit expires, the order “vacating the initial sentence wither[s] and is of

no effect.” United States v. Morrison, 204 F.3d 1091, 1094 (11 Cir. 2004). th

As conceded by Silas, the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter the

amended order. Phillips, 597 F.3d at 1196-97. We are required to consider the

district court’s jurisdiction sua sponte, see United States v. Straub, 508 F.3d 1003,

1008 (11th Cir. 2007), but even were we to look for invited error, we would find

none because the Government objected to the Rule35(a) hearing and did not invite

2

Case: 12-10371 Date Filed: 02/05/2013 Page: 2 of 3 
any subsequent error because it never acquiesced or agreed to the lack of

jurisdiction at resentencing. Moreover, we have specifically said the failure to

raise the Rule 35(a) time limit does not waive the issue on appeal. Morrison, 204

F.3d 1093. Accordingly, the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter the amended

sentence of imprisonment.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

3

Case: 12-10371 Date Filed: 02/05/2013 Page: 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4412 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4412

  To require the head of any Federal agency to differentiate between 
  fats, oils, and greases of animal, marine, or vegetable origin, and 
 other oils and greases, in issuing certain regulations, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1994

    Ms. Long (for herself, Mr. Ewing, Mr. Boehner, Mr. Rowland, Mr. 
 Skelton, Mr. Holden, Mr. Montgomery, and Mr. Emerson) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on 
                  Agriculture and Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the head of any Federal agency to differentiate between 
  fats, oils, and greases of animal, marine, or vegetable origin, and 
 other oils and greases, in issuing certain regulations, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIFFERENTIATION AMONG FATS, OILS, AND GREASES.

    (a) In General.--In issuing any regulation or establishing any 
interpretation or guideline relating to a fat, oil, or grease under any 
Federal law, the head of any Federal agency shall differentiate 
between--
            (1)(A) animal fats and oils and greases, and fish and 
        marine mammal oils, within the meaning of paragraph (2) of 
        section 61(a) of title 13, United States Code; or
            (B) oils of vegetable origin, including oils from the 
        seeds, nuts, and kernels referred to in paragraph (1)(A) of 
        such section; and
            (2) other oils and greases, including petroleum.
    (b) Considerations.--In differentiating between the class of fats, 
oils, and greases described in subsection (a)(1) and the class of oils 
and greases described in subsection (a)(2), the head of the Federal 
agency shall consider differences in the physical, chemical, 
biological, and other properties, and in the environmental effects, of 
the classes.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2008 (the Report), I, Gregory Norden, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 4, 2008



By:

/s/    Gregory NordenGregory Norden Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.749 Action on application under delegated authority.

Certain applications do not require action by the Commission but, pursuant to the delegated authority contained in subpart B of part 0 of this chapter, may be acted upon by the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau subject to reconsideration by the Commission.

[67 FR 13223, Mar. 21, 2002]
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PROPPANT EXPRESS INVESTMENTS LLC, 

PROPPANT EXPRESS SOLUTIONS LLC, 

Appellants

v.

OREN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 

Cross-Appellant

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of 

Commerce for Intellectual Property and 

Director of the United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, 

Intervenor

______________________

2020-1557, 2020-1572

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-

01917.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

Case: 20-1557 Document: 62 Page: 1 Filed: 06/03/2022
PROPPANT EXPRESS INVESTMENTS LLC V. OREN 

TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

2

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint agreement

to dismiss the appeals,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeals are 

dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

June 3, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 3, 2022

Case: 20-1557 Document: 62 Page: 2 Filed: 06/03/2022
No. 11-9202.

#### Flood *v.*Pennsylvania.

Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: Updated Clerk’s Office Phone Menu System
§ 101.131 Transmitter construction and installation. ( a ) The equipment at the operating and transmitting positions must be so installed and protected that it is not accessible to, or capable of being operated by, persons other than those duly authorized by the licensee.
( b ) In any case where the maximum modulating frequency of a transmitter is prescribed by the Commission, the transmitter must be equipped with a low-pass or band-pass modulation filter of suitable performance characteristics. In those cases where a modulation limiter is employed, the modulation filter must be installed between the transmitter stage in which limiting is effected and the modulated stage of the transmitter.
( c ) Each transmitter employed in these services must be equipped with an appropriately labeled pilot lamp or meter which will provide continuous visual indication at the transmitter when its control circuits have been placed in a condition to activate the transmitter. In addition, facilities must be provided at each transmitter to permit the transmitter to be turned on and off independently of any remote control circuits associated therewith.
( d ) At each transmitter control point the following facilities must be installed: ( 1 ) A carrier operated device which will provide continuous visual indication when the transmitter is radiating, or, in lieu thereof, a pilot lamp or meter which will provide continuous visual indication when the transmitter control circuits have been placed in a condition to activate the transmitter; and
( 2 ) Facilities which will permit the operator to turn transmitter carrier on and off at will.
( e ) Transmitter control circuits from any control point must be so installed that grounding or shorting any line in the control circuit will not cause the transmitter to radiate: provided, however, That this provision will not be applicable to control circuits of stations which normally operate with continuous radiation or to control circuits which are under the effective operational control of responsible operating personnel 24 hours per day.
**Exhibit 10.3**

**AMENDMENT TO**

**THE 1994 RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS**

Effective as of September 27, 2007, the 1994 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors was amended as follows: 

Section 6 was amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

Section 6. Adjustments. In the event of a recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend, combination or exchange of shares, merger, consolidation, rights offering, separation, reorganization orliquidation, or any other change in the corporate structure or shares of the Company, the Committee shall make such equitable adjustments, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights, as it may deem appropriate in the number and class of sharesauthorized to be granted hereunder. 

 

1
#### § 50-204.7 Personal protective equipment.

Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact. Where employees provide their own protective equipment, the employer shall be responsible to assure its adequacy, including proper maintenance and sanitation of such equipment. All personal protective equipment shall be of safe design and construction for the work to be performed.

[35 FR 1015, Jan. 24, 1970]
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph E. Porcello,
Vice President, Finance and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ Joseph E. Porcello
--------------------------------------
Joseph E. Porcello
Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
April 29, 2003


                                       34
November 21,2014 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Taxies 

EPA East 

Room 4146 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Re: EPA- HQ- OPPT- 2003 - 0012 

CBIC Control Number 

362739 

RECEIVED 

OPPT CBIC 

201Y NOV 2lf M111: II 

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts 

Chambers Works 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal- Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

October 2014 Sample Data 

Dear Chemical Control Division: 

Attached please find siunmaries ofPFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works 

weekly grab samples taken at in~ernal outfall DSN662A in October 2014. In accordance)with the 

current site NJPDES permit (NJD005100, effective September 2011 ), these results are pr6vided 

to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. The enclosures 

include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results from this monitoring period. 

Sine~ t 

Amutlia Jeyarajasingam 

Area Manager-Secure Environmental Treatment 

DuPont Chambers Works 

AJ/clc 

Enclosures 
Copy to: 

Document Control Office 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Taxies 

EPA East 

Room 6428 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) 

Principal Environmental Engineer 

NJDEP Division of Water Quality 

Bureau of Water Surfacing 

Mail Code 40 l-02B 

401 E. State Street 

P.O. Box420 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 
1-UA 

Summary of Analytical Results 

662- October 2014 

'IDL__§§2:GRABI 662-GRABI 662-GRJ\Ej[__ 662-GRAB 

Date 

Top (fl) 

Bottom (fl) 

Duplicate# 

lug/L IT - I I 3.68 3.82 3.88 2.36 

PFOA= 

ug/L = 1 

lug/L = 

LOQ=limitof 

::Acid 

; per Liter 

s per liter or parts per billion (ppb) 

n = 0.100 ug/L 

; were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results 1 1 

t a single analysis, except for the sample.-qollacted on 10/6/14. 

ision was obtained and the reported result for the sample 

d on 1 d/6/14 represents the averaQe of lab duplicate results. 

The NJDEP lab· 1umber for Crfflcal Path ; is PA072. 

::-· ~ .. 

<and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 

Copy of cwk 662 grab results_oct14.xls:Sheet1 

11/18/2014 1:53 PM
# Comments on: 17-1825: KUMAR v. IANCU [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.207 Interlocutory matters, reconsideration and review; cross references. ( a ) Rules governing interlocutory pleadings in hearing proceedings are set forth in §§ 1.291 through 1.298.
( b ) Rules governing appeal from rulings made by the presiding officer are set forth as §§ 1.301 and 1.302.
( c ) Rules governing the reconsideration and review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority, and the reconsideration of actions taken by the Commission, are set forth in §§ 1.101 through 1.117.
[28 FR 12425, Nov. 22, 1963, as amended at 29 FR 6443, May 16, 1964; 36 FR 19439, Oct. 6, 1971; 76 FR 70908, Nov. 16, 2011]
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

REBECCA GALLOGLY,

Petitioner

v.

UNITED STATES,

Respondent

______________________

2020-150

______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States 

Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW, Senior 

Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams.

______________________

ON PETITION AND MOTION

______________________

Before DYK, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Rebecca Gallogly petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the United States Court of Federal Claims to docket

submissions entitled “Plaintiff’s Amended Objections to 

Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from 

Judgment,” ECF No. 2-1 at 10–28, and “Motion for Leave 

Case: 20-150 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 10/19/2020
2 GALLOGLY v. US

to File Amended Objections,” ECF No. 2-1 at 29–45. She 

also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Review of the docket before the Court of Federal 

Claims shows that these documents were entered on the 

docket on September 14, 2020. See Gallogly v. United 

States, No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW (Fed. Cl. Aug. 28, 2020), 

ECF No. 33. Additionally, on September 21, 2020, that 

court granted Dr. Gallogly’s motion for leave to file 

amended objections. See Gallogly v. United States, No. 

1:20-cv-00261-MCW (Fed. Cl. Sept. 21, 2020), ECF No. 35. 

Because Dr. Gallogly has received the requested relief, 

we deny her petition as moot.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as 

moot.

(2) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

is granted.

October 19, 2020

Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

s25

Case: 20-150 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 10/19/2020