alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

United States Postal Service Board of Governors

# TIMES AND DATES:

10:00 a.m., Monday, July 10, 2000; 8:30 a.m., Tuesday, July 11, 2000.

# PLACE:

Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

# STATUS:

July 10 (Closed); July 11 (Open).

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

#### Monday, July 10—10:00 a.m. (Closed)

1. Financial Performance and Schedule for Fiscal Year 2001 Integrated Financial Plan.

2. Strategic Planning.

3. Rate Case Update.

4. International Funds Transfer.

5. Priority Mail Processing Centers (PMPCs).

6. Personnel Matters.

7. Compensation Issues.

#### Tuesday, July—8:30 a.m. (Open)

1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, June 5-6, 2000.

2. Remarks of the Postmaster General/Chief Executive Officer.

3. Board Resolution on Capital Funding.

4. Quarterly Report on Service Performance.

5. Quarterly Report on Financial Results.

6. Capital Investments.

a. Surface-Air Management System (SAMS).

b. Delivery Operations Information System (DOIS).

c. 362 Automated Flat Sorting Machine (AFSM) 100s.

d. Mail Evaluation Instrument (MERLIN).

7. Tentative Agenda for the August 7-8, 2000, meeting in Reno, Nevada.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

David G. Hunter, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

David G. Hunter,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16668  Filed 6-27-00; 3:33 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
§ 22.143 Construction prior to grant of application. Applicants may construct facilities in the Public Mobile services prior to grant of their applications, subject to the provisions of this section, but must not operate such facilities until the FCC grants an authorization. If the conditions stated in this section are not met, applicants must not begin to construct facilities in the Public Mobile Services. ( a ) *When applicants may begin construction.* An applicant may begin construction of a facility 35 days after the date of the Public Notice listing the application for that facility as acceptable for filing.
( b ) *Notification to stop.* If the FCC for any reason determines that construction should not be started or should be stopped while an application is pending, and so notifies the applicant, orally (followed by written confirmation) or in writing, the applicant must not begin construction or, if construction has begun, must stop construction immediately.
( c ) *Assumption of risk.* Applicants that begin construction pursuant to this section before receiving an authorization do so at their own risk and have no recourse against the United States for any losses resulting from: ( 1 ) Applications that are not granted;
( 2 ) Errors or delays in issuing Public Notices;
( 3 ) Having to alter, relocate or dismantle the facility; or
( 4 ) Incurring whatever costs may be necessary to bring the facility into compliance with applicable laws, or FCC rules and orders.
( d ) *Conditions.* Except as indicated, all pre-grant construction is subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) The application is not mutually exclusive with any other application, except for successful bidders and tentative selectees in the Cellular Radiotelephone Service;
( 2 ) No petitions to deny the application have been filed;
( 3 ) The application does not include a request for a waiver of one or more FCC rules;
( 4 ) For any construction or alteration that would exceed the requirements of § 17.7 of this chapter, the licensee has notified the appropriate Regional Office of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA Form 7460-1), secured a valid FAA determination of “no hazard,” and received antenna height clearance and obstruction marking and lighting specifications (FCC Form 854R) from the FCC for the proposed construction or alteration.
( 5 ) The applicant has indicated in the application that the proposed facility would not have a significant environmental effect, in accordance with §§ 1.1301 through 1.1319 of this chapter; and,
( 6 ) Under applicable international agreements and rules in this part, individual coordination of the proposed channel assignment(s) with a foreign administration is not required.
[59 FR 59507, Nov. 17, 1994, as amended at 70 FR 19308, Apr. 13, 2005; 77 FR 3954, Jan. 26, 2012; 79 FR 72151, Dec. 5, 2014]
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Praveen Nair, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Solutions
Worldwide, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                            DATE: AUGUST 14, 2008

                                            /S/ PRAVEEN NAIR
                                            --------------------
                                            PRAVEEN NAIR
                                            CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
FORM 26. Docketing Statement 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

DOCKETING STATEMENT 

Case Number: 

Sh ort Case Caption: 

Form 26 (p. 1) 

July 2020 

------------------------

Filing Party/Entity: 

Instructions: Complete each section or check the box if a section is intentionally 

blank or not applicable. Attach additional pages as needed. Refer to t he court's 

Mediation Guidelines for filing requirements. An amended docketing stat ement is 

required for each new appeal or cross-appeal consolidat ed after first filing. 

Case Origin Originating Number Type of Case 

Relief sought on appeal: D None/Not Applicable 

Relief awarded below (if damages, specify): D None/Not Applicable 

Briefly describe the judgment/order appealed from: 

Natur e of judgment (select one): Dat e of judgment : ______ _ 

D Final Judgment, 28 USC § 1295 

□ Rule 54(b) 

D Interlocutory Order (specify type) ______________ _ 

D Other ( explain) 
FORM 26. Docketing Statement Form 26 (p. 2) 

July 2020 

Name and docket number of any r elated cases pending before this court, and t he 

name of the writing judge if an opinion was issued. D None/Not Applicable 

Issues to be raised on appeal: D None/Not Applicable 

Have t her e been discussions with other parties relating to settlement of this case? 

D Yes □ No 

If "yes," when were the last such discussions? 

D Befor e the case was filed below 

D During t he pendency of t he case below 

D Following the judgment/order appealed from 

If "yes," wer e the settlement discussions mediat ed? 

If they were mediated, by w horn? 

D Yes 0 No 

Do you believe that this case may be amenable t o mediation? D Yes D No 

Explain . 

Provide any other information r elevant to the inclusion of t his case in t he court's 

mediation program. 

Dat e: Signature: 

Name: 

Save for Filing
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schdule contains summary financial informtion extracted from the 
Cotelligent Group, Inc. consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001004963
<NAME>                                         Cotelligent Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.0
<CASH>                                         40528
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  51105
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2123
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               92032
<PP&E>                                         12859
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          28003
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       141
<OTHER-SE>                                     90198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118559
<SALES>                                        244683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               244683
<CGS>                                          173537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  56784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                13654
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7223
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6431
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.55
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC
LUTHER KURTZ and SKYDIVE COASTAL CALIFORNIA d/b/a PHOENIX AREA SYDIVING, Complainant, 

### v. CITY OF CASA GRANDE, ARIZONA, Respondent. FAA Docket No. 16-16-01

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OFTIME This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above
referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CFR part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFRpart 16, subpart B, the date by whichthe Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to June 16, 2017. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case due to the complexity ofthe Record.

Kevin . Willis Directo Airport Compliance and Management Analysis 

# ltb 2011 )

### CERTIFICATEOFSERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April 18, 2017, I FedX a true copy ofthe foregoing document addressed to: Counsel for Complainant: Mr. Richard 

### J. Durden 27987 Richmond Hill Road Conifer, CO 80433 Counsel for Respondent: Brett D. Wallace City Attorney's Office 510 E. Florence Blvd Casa Grande, AZ 85122 Copies to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 FAA Western Pacific Region, AWP-600



# ~ Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance

and Management Analysis
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jennifer Dawson, Chief Financial Officer of Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By:    | /s/ Jennifer Dawson    
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Jennifer Dawson        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | July 24, 2009          

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Capital Corp
of the West Annual Report for 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      12,982,000
<SECURITIES>                                43,378,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              183,247,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (2,792,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      11,368,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,102,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             265,989,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,974,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               265,989,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,286,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,736,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,513,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,865,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,172,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,163,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,009,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,009,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Notice of Extension of Access Restrictions for the National Courts Building - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZtygqmW1Gi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-extension-of-access-restrictions-for-the-national-courts-building-2\/\">Notice of Extension of Access Restrictions for the National Courts Building<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/notice-of-extension-of-access-restrictions-for-the-national-courts-building-2\/embed\/#?secret=ZtygqmW1Gi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Notice of Extension of Access Restrictions for the National Courts Building” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"ZtygqmW1Gi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States Court of Federal Claims have entered a joint order extending their prior administrative orders of June 26, 2020, concerning access to the National Courts Building complex in Washington, D.C. \u00a0 Effective immediately, building access will continue to remain limited to court […]"}
9 June 2016

150P16

#### Jason Lee Mutter v. Michael Ball, Superintendent of Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution

1. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA (COAP15-519)

1. Denied 04/25/2016

2. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed 04/25/2016

3. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

3. Dismissed as moot 04/25/2016

Ervin, J.,

recused
300P15

#### Edward Battle, Jr., Employee v. Meadowbrook Meat Company, Inc., Employer, Self-Insured (Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Third-Party Administrator)

1. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1059)

1.-

2. Pit’s Motion to Withdraw Petition for Discretionary Review

2. Allowed
794 A.2d 119

#### IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW T. BRASNO, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

April 2, 2002.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-274, recommending that ANDREW T. BRASNO, JR., of SOUTH RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, be disbarred for the knowing misappropriation of client trust funds in violation of *RPC*1.15 and *RPC*8.4(c);

And ANDREW T. BRASNO, JR., having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANDREW T. BRASNO, JR., be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by ANDREW T. BRASNO, JR., pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that ANDREW T. BRASNO, JR. be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
#### § 303-70.201 How many persons may be authorized travel expenses to escort the remains of a deceased employee?

You may authorize travel expenses for no more than two persons.