alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2020-1260: P.K. Management Group, Inc. v. HUD - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SmbpsMiwDD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-09-2020-2020-1260-pk-management-group-inc-v-hud-audio-uploaded\/\">2020-1260: P.K. Management Group, Inc. v. HUD<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-09-2020-2020-1260-pk-management-group-inc-v-hud-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=SmbpsMiwDD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2020-1260: P.K. Management Group, Inc. v. HUD” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"SmbpsMiwDD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: P.K. Management Group, Inc. v. HUD (mp3) Appeal Number: 2020-1260 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
No. 11-1209.

#### Gutierrez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
115P16

#### Willie T. Kelly, Jr. v. P. McCrory, Governor, et al.

1. Plt’s *Pro Se*Motion for Tort Claim Civil Complaint

1. Dismissed

2. Plt’s *Pro Se*Motion for Summons to Appear in Civil Complaint

2. Dismissed
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-2178: In Re NSIXTY, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ESRTtdC0jq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-01-2022-22-2178-in-re-nsixty-llc-order-22-2178-order-12-1-2022_2040924\/\">22-2178: In Re NSIXTY, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-01-2022-22-2178-in-re-nsixty-llc-order-22-2178-order-12-1-2022_2040924\/embed\/#?secret=ESRTtdC0jq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-2178: In Re NSIXTY, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"ESRTtdC0jq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: In Re NSIXTY, LLC [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-2178 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 20, 2004 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                |  |                            
|                |  | John P. Manning            
|                |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2496]

The following Commission staff are assigned to help facilitate resolution of environmental issues and related issues for any filings that may be submitted to the Commission for the Leaburg Walterville Project.

### Office of General Council

Ellen Korthaus-Vos (202) 501-6794

Merrill Hathaway (202) 208-0825

### Office of Energy Projects

Jim Hastreiter (503) 944-6760

The staff listed above are separated from the advisory staff in these proceedings and will not participate as advisory staff in these proceedings.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16695  Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
               EXTRACTED FROM THE ARMCO INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
               SHEETS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND 
               ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
               REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
<CIK>          0000007383
<NAME>         ARMCO INC.
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
<CURRENCY>     U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                            125,600
<SECURITIES>                       12,300
<RECEIVABLES>                     187,800
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       275,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  613,800
<PP&E>                          1,316,800
<DEPRECIATION>                    685,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,827,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             314,300
<BONDS>                           303,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                       185,900
<COMMON>                            1,100
<OTHER-SE>                        (56,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,827,800
<SALES>                           897,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  897,800
<CGS>                             800,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     800,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 14,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    55,300
<INCOME-TAX>                        3,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                51,400
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                         237,500
<NET-INCOME>                      288,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        2.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                        2.26
        

</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

HEATHER A. MELTON,

Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent

______________________

2022-1993

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. CH-0752-09-0448-M-1.

______________________

Before HUGHES, WALLACH, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

In response to the court’s August 31, 2022, order to 

show cause, the Merit Systems Protection Board urges dismissal of this petition for review as untimely. Heather A. 

Melton has not responded. 

The Board entered its final decision in this case on 

April 21, 2022, affirming the dismissal of Ms. Melton’s petition for enforcement. This court received Ms. Melton’s 

petition for review seventy-one days later, on July 1, 2022. 

Case: 22-1993 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 11/09/2022
2 MELTON v. MSPB

Section 7703(b)(1)(A) of title 5 of the U.S. Code mandates that a petition for review “shall be filed within 60 

days after the Board issues notice of the final order or decision of the Board.” This deadline is jurisdictional and not 

subject to equitable tolling. See Fedora v. Merit Sys. Prot. 

Bd., 848 F.3d 1013, 1016 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Thus, we only 

consider whether the petition for review was timely filed. 

Ms. Melton’s petition here was received outside of the 60-

day filing deadline, and we therefore dismiss.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for review is dismissed. 

(2) All pending motions are denied as moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

November 9, 2022

 Date

 FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

Case: 22-1993 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 11/09/2022
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Section
      1350**


**CERTIFICATION**








The
      undersigned officer hereby certifies
      that, to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE
      Corporation for the quarter endedJuly 1,
      2007 as to which this Certification is
      an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the
      information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE
      Corporation.





SignedAugust
      7,2007.








/s/ John
                C. FanningJohn
                C. Fanning,Chairman
                and Chief Executive Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ANALOG DEVICES, INC., 

Appellant

v.

XILINX, INC., XILINX ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD., 

Appellees

______________________

2022-1537

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-

01219.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 22-1537 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 08/23/2022
2 ANALOG DEVICES, INC. V. XILINX, INC.

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

August 23, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 23, 2022

Case: 22-1537 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 08/23/2022
792 A.2d 1242

#### IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM D. MANNS, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

April 3, 2002.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-398, concluding that WILLIAM D. MANNS, JR., of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.3 (lack of diligence), *RPC*1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), *RPC*3.2 (failure to expedite litigation), *RPC*3.3(a)(1) (false statement of material fact or law to tribunal) and *RPC*8.4(c) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit of misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM D. MANNS, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"20-2209: CUSTOMPLAY, LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"56rvYYSa5o\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/02-15-2022-20-2209-customplay-llc-v-amazoncom-inc-rule-36-judgment-20-2209-rule_36_judgment-2-15-2022_1908334\/\">20-2209: CUSTOMPLAY, LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/02-15-2022-20-2209-customplay-llc-v-amazoncom-inc-rule-36-judgment-20-2209-rule_36_judgment-2-15-2022_1908334\/embed\/#?secret=56rvYYSa5o\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“20-2209: CUSTOMPLAY, LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"56rvYYSa5o\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"RULE 36 JUDGMENT Posted: CUSTOMPLAY, LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT](pdf) Appeal Number: 20-2209 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION

PANO CALAVRIAS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:22-cv-23115-JEM

QUARANTENA, LLC., 

PHILLIPS MARINE GROUP, LLC.,

PLACES LUXURY RENTALS, LLC.,

and CODY STRICKLAND,

Defendant. 

________________________________/

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF PARTIES LISTED

Plaintiff, PANO CALAVRIAS, gives notice of entry of all current parties in the instant 

case: PANO CALAVRIAS, QUARANTENA, LLC., PHILLIPS MARINE GROUP, LLC., 

PLACES LUXURY RENTALS, LLC., and CODY STRICKLAND.

Plaintiff hereby requests that all additional defendants PHILLIPS MARINE GROUP, 

LLC., PLACES LUXURY RENTALS, LLC., and CODY STRICKLAND be added to the docket 

as defendants.

Date: October 12, 2022

DEMESMIN & DOVER, PLLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

1650 SE 17th Street

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316

Office (866) 954-6673 

Facsimile (954) 323-4258

Jdover@attorneysoftheinjured.com

pfrancois@dd-legal.com

By: /s/ Jeremy Dover 

Case 1:22-cv-23115-JEM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/12/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

PATRICIA FRANCOIS, ESQ.

FBN: 1018548

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 12, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing is being 

served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List in the manner 

specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some 

other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive 

electronically notices of Electronic filing. 

By: /s/ Jeremy Dover 

PATRICIA FRANCOIS, ESQ.

FBN: 1018548

Case 1:22-cv-23115-JEM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/12/2022 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,686
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  188,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,610
<INVENTORY>                                    389,592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               598,976
<PP&E>                                         102,991
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 758,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          390,547
<BONDS>                                          5,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          194,518
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                     166,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   758,643
<SALES>                                      1,849,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,178,566
<CGS>                                        1,665,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,864,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (7,780)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,903
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,765
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,138
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,994
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
        

</TABLE>