alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7095
ARLIS ZARKIAI HICKS-BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ELLIS WRIGHT, Warden; SERGEANT MAYES; T. JARRELL, Officer; M. LEE, Officer; R. COLEMAN, Officer; OFFICER HARRIS; ALL OF GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-94-1279-CV-2) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 11, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arlis Zarkiai Hicks-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom , 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied , 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of Environmental Solutions
Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period June 30, 2008 (the
"Report"), David J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, and President of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                             DATE: AUGUST 14, 2008


                             /S/ DAVID J. JOHNSON
                             --------------------
                             DAVID J. JOHNSON
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### IN THE MATTER OF JAMES R. VENABLE.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 730)

(382 SE2d 598)

Decided July 27, 1989.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Glyndon C. Pruitt,*for Venable.

Per curiam.

Pursuant to State Bar Rule 4-108 (a), the State Bar of Georgia has petitioned this Court for an Interim Suspension of an Attorney Pending Disciplinary Proceedings.

It appears that there are two Disciplinary Charges now pending in this Court against respondent Venable, these being Supreme Court Disciplinary Nos. 698 and 725. This petition for Interim Suspension is predicated upon the conduct complained of in No. 725.

It further appears that respondent Venable, by and through his attorney, has consented to a suspension of his practice of law until a disposition of this matter has been made.

It is therefore ordered and directed that respondent Venable be suspended from the practice of law pending the outcome of Disciplinary No. 725.

This suspension is to become effective July 27, 1989, and Glyndon C. Pruitt, respondent’s attorney, is hereby appointed to see that all of respondent’s clients are protected.

This 27th day of July 1989.

*All the Justices*concur.
404 A.2d 1357

#### Commonwealth v. Shockley, Appellant.

Submitted December 6, 1977.

Edward F. Browne, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; D. Richard Eckman, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

JACOBS, former P. J., WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,323,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              118,537,808
<ALLOWANCES>                              (11,349,783)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,082,772
<DEPRECIATION>                               (826,995)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,755,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,860
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,263,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               119,755,951
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,000,247
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,790,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             4,000,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,281,428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,928,348
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,695,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,233,348
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (149,789)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,083,559
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81512-CIV-CANNON

NELSON FERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

LITE USA HOLDINGS, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 

[ECF No. 11], filed on December 21, 2022. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure, the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Plaintiffs prior to any Defendant 

serving an answer or motion for summary judgment, dismisses the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(i). Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, effective December 

21, 2022, the date on which Plaintiffs filed the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [ECF No. 11].

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 21st day of 

December 2022.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81512-AMC Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/27/2022 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly
Report of Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2005 (the
Report), I, Kenneth J. Martin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Dated: November 7,
2005 |  | By: /s/           
         Kenneth J. Martin
     

           
               
    Kenneth J. Martin
       Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Comments on: 23-1028: SANFORD v. FRANKLIN, VA [ORDER], Nonprecedential
```

[House Report 106-523]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-523

=======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
 1000, THE WENDELL H. FORD AVIATION INVESTMENT AND REFORM ACT FOR THE 
                              21ST CENTURY

                                _______
                                

   March 14, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 438]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 438, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 1000, the Wendell H. Ford 
Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-
21). The rule waives all points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration.
    The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of 
clause 9 of rule XXII (violating the scope of the conference) 
because section 106(c) was not committed to the conference 
committee by either chamber.

                                


```
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.1



Summary of Viacom Inc. Compensation for Outside Directors 
(Effective as of October 31, 2016) 
Cash Compensation 
 
		
	•
	The Chair of the Board receives an annual Board retainer of $300,000, the Vice Chair of the Board receives an annual retainer of $200,000 and all other outside directors receive an annual retainer of $100,000, in each case payable in equal installments quarterly in advance.




		
	•
	The Chairs of the Audit and Compensation Committees each receive an annual retainer of $20,000, payable in equal installments quarterly in advance, and the members of those Committees receive a per meeting attendance fee of $2,000. 




		
	•
	The Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee receives an annual retainer of $15,000, payable in equal installments quarterly in advance, and the members of that Committee receive a per meeting attendance fee of $1,500.




Outside directors may elect to defer their cash compensation under the Viacom Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors. 
Equity Compensation 


		
	•
	Each outside director receives an annual grant on January 31st of each year of Restricted Share Units (RSUs), the number of which is determined by dividing (i) $175,000 by (ii) the fair market value of one share of Class B Common Stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market (NASDAQ) on the date of grant. 




		
	•
	In addition, the Lead Independent Director receives an annual grant on January 31st of each year of RSUs, the number of which is determined by dividing (i) $50,000 by (ii) the fair market value of one share of Class B Common Stock on NASDAQ on the date of grant.    


		
	•
	All RSUs vest one year from the date of grant and are payable to outside directors in shares of Class B Common Stock upon vesting unless the outside director has previously elected to defer settlement of the RSUs to a future date.  Outside directors are entitled to receive dividend equivalents on the RSUs in the event the Company pays a regular cash dividend on its Class B Common Stock.
#### IN THE MATTER OF ALVIN C. McDOUGALD.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary Nos. 693, 713, 714, 715, 716)

(386 SE2d 661)

Decided October 19, 1989.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Paula J. Frederick, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Garland T. Byrd,*for McDougald.

Per curiam.

Respondent Alvin C. McDougald has petitioned for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in the State of Georgia. His petition is based upon his admissions of fact and conduct in violation of Standard Nos. 4, 22, 23, 44, and 45 of the State Bar of Georgia Rule 4-102.

Respondent, in his petition, requests that this Court accept his voluntary surrender of his license to practice law.

In light of the above and in view of the recommendation of the Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board that Respondent be allowed to surrender his license to practice law, it is directed that he be allowed to surrender his license. Before any reinstatement petition is granted, he must comply with the reinstatement rules of the State Bar of Georgia in effect at such time.

There is also docketed in this Court by the Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Georgia, Docket Nos. 713, 714, 715, and 716. In the Matter of Alvin C. McDougald, wherein same or similar charges are set forth. Respondent has in each of these cases requested acceptance by this Court of the voluntary surrender of his license to practice law.

In view of this Court’s acceptance of the voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in Supreme Court Docket No. 693, we direct that the proceedings in Supreme Court Docket Nos. 713, 714, 715, and 716 be returned to the State Bar Disciplinary Board to be placed upon the inactive docket and reactivated in the event Mr. Mc-Dougald ever petitions for reinstatement to the practice of law in the State of Georgia.

Application for voluntary surrender of license is granted.

*All the Justices concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3959-3960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6528-4]


Board of Scientific Counselors, Executive Committee Meeting

AGENCY:  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 
92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C., App. 2) notification is hereby given that 
the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development 
(ORD), Board of Scientific Counselors (BOSC), will hold an Executive 
Committee Meeting.

DATES:  The meeting will be held on February 9-10, 2000. On Wednesday, 
February 9, the meeting will begin at 9 a.m., and will recess at 4:30 
p.m. On Thursday, February 10, the meeting will reconvene at 8:45 a.m. 
and adjourn at approximately 1 p.m. All times noted are Eastern Time.

ADDRESSES:  The meeting will be held at the Washington Monarch Hotel, 
2401 M Street, NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Shirley R. Hamilton, Designated 
Federal Officer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of 
Research and Development, NCERQA (MC 8701R), 401 M Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-6853.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Agenda items will include, but not limited 
to: Discussion on ORD's Particulate Matter<SUP>2.5</SUP> Research 
Program and BOSC subcommittee Draft Reports on Particulate Matter, and 
SAB and BOSC subcommittee Review of ORD's Science to Achieve Results 
(STAR) Program. Anyone desiring a draft BOSC agenda may fax their 
request to Shirley R. Hamilton, (202) 565-2444. The meeting is open to 
the public. Any member of the public wishing to make a presentation at 
the meeting should contact Shirley Hamilton, Designated Federal 
Officer, Office of Research and Development (8701R), 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., 
Washington , DC 20460; or by telephone at (202) 564-6853. In general, 
each individual making an oral presentation will be limited to a total 
of three minutes.

[[Page 3960]]


    Dated: January 18, 2000.
John C. Puzak,
Acting Director, National Center for Environmental Research and Quality 
Assurance.
[FR Doc. 00-1665 Filed 1-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
No. 11M110.

#### Oates *v.*Hedgpeth, Warden.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2017-2169: Vedanti Licensing Limited v. Google LLC - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zfyKYkd8jb\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/3-07-2019-2017-2169-vedanti-licensing-limited-v-google-llc-audio-uploaded\/\">2017-2169: Vedanti Licensing Limited v. Google LLC<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/3-07-2019-2017-2169-vedanti-licensing-limited-v-google-llc-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=zfyKYkd8jb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2017-2169: Vedanti Licensing Limited v. Google LLC” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"zfyKYkd8jb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Vedanti Licensing Limited v. Google LLC (mp3) Appeal Number: 2017-2169 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
§ 14.34 Informal complaints; form, filing, content, and consumer assistance. ( a ) An informal complaint alleging a violation of section 255, 716 or 718 of the Act or parts 6, 7, or 14 of this chapter may be transmitted to the Enforcement Bureau by any reasonable means, including the Commission's online informal complaint filing system, U.S. Mail, overnight delivery, or email. Any Requests filed using a method other than the Commission's online system should include a cover letter that references section 255, 716, or 718 or the rules of parts 6, 7, or 14 of this chapter and should be addressed to the Enforcement Bureau.
( b ) An informal complaint shall include: ( 1 ) The name, address, email address, and telephone number of the complainant;
( 2 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the manufacturer or service provider defendant against whom the complaint is made;
( 3 ) The date or dates on which the complainant or person(s) on whose behalf the complaint is being filed either purchased, acquired, or used or attempted to purchase, acquire, or use the equipment or service about which the complaint is being made;
( 4 ) A complete statement of fact explaining why the complainant contends that the defendant manufacturer or provider is in violation of section 255, 716 or 718 of the Act or the Commission's rules, including details regarding the service or equipment and the relief requested, and all documentation that supports the complainant's contention;
( 5 ) A certification that the complainant submitted to the Commission a Request for Dispute Assistance, pursuant to § 14.32, no less than 30 days before the complaint is filed;
( 6 ) The complainant's preferred format or method of response to the complaint by the Commission and defendant (e.g., letter, facsimile transmissions, telephone (voice/TRS/TTY), email, audio-cassette recording, Braille, or some other method that will best accommodate the complainant's disability, if any); and
( 7 ) Any other information that is required by the Commission's accessibility complaint form.
( c ) Any party with a question about information that should be included in an Informal Complaint should email the Commission's Disability Rights Office at *dro@fcc.gov* or call (202) 418-2517 (voice), (202) 418-2922 (TTY).
Exhibit
32.1





Section
1350


CERTIFICATION








The
undersigned officer hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation for the quarter ended March 30, 2008
as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in such Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of COMFORCE Corporation.





Signed
May 7, 2008.








/s/
      John C. FanningJohn
      C. Fanning,Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-9589.

#### Gomez *v.*Sandor, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.