alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**
 **OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 
 I, David J. Steichen, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Analysts International Corporation (the Registrant); 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing equivalent function): 
 a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: August 11, 2004
By:
/s/ David J. SteichenDavid J. SteichenChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4191 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4191

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 9630 
   Estate Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ``Aubrey C. 
                         Ottley Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 9630 Estate 
Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Aubrey C. Ottley Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Aubrey C. Ottley Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 23.1                      Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP




















Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








To the Board of Directors


North Central Bancshares, Inc.


Fort Dodge, Iowa





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Registration #333-33089) on Form S-8 as filed with the Commission on August 7, 1997 , the Registration Statement (Registration #333-82490) on Form S-8 as filed with the Commission on February 11, 2002, and the Registration Statement (Registration #333-133810) on Form S-8 as filed with the Commission on May 4, 2006, Registration Statement No. 333-157027 on Form S-3 (Registration #333-157172) as filed with the Commission on March 27, 2009, and the Registration Statement (Registration #333-168640) on Form S-8 as filed with the Commission on August 9, 2010 of North Central Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated March 11, 2011, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of North Central Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010.













Des Moines, Iowa


March 11, 2011


47
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4495 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 4495

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 5 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 to prohibit smoking on all 
 scheduled airline flight segments in air transportation or intrastate 
                          air transportation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Represenatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Airliner Cabin Air Quality Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITIONS AGAINST SMOKING ON SCHEDULED FLIGHTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 41706 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 41706. Prohibitions against smoking on scheduled flights
    ``(a) Smoking Prohibition in Intrastate and Interstate Air 
Transportation.--An individual may not smoke in an aircraft on a 
scheduled airline flight segment in interstate air transportation or 
intrastate air transportation.
    ``(b) Smoking Prohibition in Foreign Air Transportation.--The 
Secretary of Transportation shall require all air carriers and foreign 
air carriers to prohibit, on and after the 120th day following the date 
of the enactment of the Airliner Cabin Air Quality Act of 1994, smoking 
in any aircraft on a scheduled airline flight segment within the United 
States or between a place in the United States and a place outside the 
United States.
    ``(c) Limitation on Applicability.--The smoking prohibitions 
contained in subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only to the passenger 
cabin and lavatory of an aircraft operated by a foreign air carrier.
    ``(d) Regulations.--The Secretary shall prescribe regulations 
necessary to carry out this section.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the 60th day following the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 4, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Fourth Court of Ap peals
San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00443

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.H ., a child,

From the 224th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 01604
Honorable Susan D. Reed , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due on October 25, 2021. The court reporter filed a
notification of late record. The notification of late reporter’s record is hereby NOTED. Time is extended to November 24, 2021.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the sai d
court on this 17th day of November, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 440

To impose a 10-year moratorium on oil and gas leasing in certain areas

off the coast of New Jersey.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. ZIMMER (for himself, Mr. GALLO, Mr. ANDREWS of New Jersey, Mrs.

ROUKEMA, and Mr. SAXTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To impose a 10-year moratorium on oil and gas leasing

in certain areas off the coast of New Jersey.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MORATORIUM ON OIL AND GAS LEASING.

4 During the period described in section 2, the Sec5 retary of the Interior may not—

6 (1) prepare for, or conduct, any preleasing or

7 leasing activity (including, but not limited to, calls

8 for information, tract selection, notices of sale, re9 ceipt of bids, and award of leases);
2

•HR 440 IH

1 (2) approve any plan of exploration pursuant to

2 section 11 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act

3 (43 U.S.C. 1340); or

4 (3) approve any development or production plan

5 pursuant to section 25 of the Outer Continental

6 Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1351),

7 for any land within protraction diagram NK 18–12, NJ

8 18–2, NJ 18–3, NJ 18–5, NJ 18–6, or NJ 19–1, which

9 is within ‘‘sale 121-area identification’’ as depicted on the

10 map entitled ‘‘Mid-Atlantic Planning Area’’ and num11 bered MMS–11.

12 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM PERIOD.

13 The period referred to in section 1 is the 10-year pe14 riod which begins on the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
”
.

. .

Iron. c. J. Wild@ County Auditor



### Dmrr 8lrt I?.10plalon x0. 0491 Whether or 8ot Wm Coum.l8@loaerr~ Court har authority 

### to p8f deputiu taung

oar8 OS lsrrrarent

of 011 and gar and prop*rQ 0hango8 8 groakr mm of ronof than the amunt 8peolfi.d la Art1010 bool4, Rd.?)., for deputlmr of tha Tu Collaotor 8nd A88e8sor. Thlr ir 

### in ammo to your 

### letfor **ot Tobrmry**  **Si, 1939**  l ddrusad

**to** the **H@no~-** rblr Oerald C. Kenn, 

### Attorney Conoral, *oh lottar ha8 

### baoa **nierred** 

### to tho nltrr **for** oon8llleratlon

and r.pLy, IOU nquo#t an oplnion 8e to whether **or** aot the Connai88lonsrr* Court ha8 authority to pay doputlor tbUn& **aam** of m#rer#ment of 011 and gan aad propwt]r ehange8 a r@ ater sum of ronay than the mount 8~eoitle in **Artdole** 3903, R.C.E., for dqnatlos of the Tu Collaotor @nd **A##@#-** 

### 8or.
The Caaml88l~ner8* 

### Courtha8 a0 luthoritr or 

### p ovur

l oept **a6** 

### grantd **by #t#t**  utor **or** 

### the **Con#titutiOn Oi.**  To-#.

The doputl.8 

### l

n&a6ed intaki~I& OOFI of thm l

arermwnt OS Oil and @8, and k-pin(; up wlth property changer uo ongag in 

### th@ pertoxmmoe of the dutlr8 **ww.aabent Upon**  

### the oitloe or thm COuntp Tax Qollootor **and** Asrrs- #or8 The Cmalaelonerr* Court ha8 io authorl-Hon. C.J. ;tlldo, **February** 13. 1939, Fag. 8



### tr or power to ippolnt deputlon for the perfonarsnoa Of thO8e duti.8, 

### l xoept by the proendure **pnnorfbed** in Artida 3902, R.C.E.



### Vhenever any dlstrlat, oounb 

### ty or pnolnat 0fflcor 8hall nqulro 

### the 88l'ViU.B

Of dOputiO#, 88SI8tantB Or olwk8 in the par?ormano~ Ot hi8 &utles ho 8hall apply 

### to the County COiZdBSiOII~rB'

Court Of hi8 i3Olllltr for authority to appoint 8uoh **depu** 

### C:G tiU,

**88SiBtJ4lltB** 

### Of

slerks, l 

## tating bJ #worn 

### l

pplloatlon 

## the number **mod** M, the POBitiOll to bo iillad aad 

### the mount to be paid. ' * * The COBpenrstlon which ray ba allowed t0 thm 

### dOpUtie8,

l **BiBtfUIta or**  **olerks 8boro**  nmnod iOr their 8elvloes 

### 8hall be 8 moronable 

### one, sot to 

### l rooed tb follOwlng 

### uounts: * * &I@ Theretore, it 18 our oplnfon, and you an 80 advised, that the deputies performlng the dutler rlloged muat aeoeeserf.1~ k IeputJtu oollsotcr6 wd 

### l 8886~0re, **end** must quality **and** be oompennatod as Buoh. Believing thin **reply** to an8wr your Inquiry, we an **Your8** Yaw truly

.

ATTOHNBY GXSRAL OP TEl(Ac3



### (#lgn*d) Pat Coon A~sintant
**PC:ob** APLppztOVED
No. 4 February 2, 2017 807

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

John B. WELS, Jr., Respondent on Review,

v. Douglas W. HIPPE, Defendant, and Le Roy HIPPE and Cheryl Hippe, Petitioners on Review. (CC 101215E3; CA A150238; SC S063486)
On petition for reconsideration filed by petitioners on review December 5, 2016; considered and under advisement January 4, 2017.* Clayton C. Patrick, Clatskanie, filed the petition for reconsideration for petitioners on review. No appearance contra

. Before, Balmer, Chief Justice, and Kistler, Walters, Landau, Baldwin, and Brewer, Justices, and DeHoog, Judge of the Court of Appeals, Justice pro tempore.** LANDAU, J. The petition for reconsideration is allowed. The former opinion is modified and adhered to as modified.
Case Summary: In a claim for a prescriptive easement, the Supreme Court originally remanded the case to the circuit court for further proceedings. Held : the opinion of the Supreme Court is modified to remand the case to the circuit court for entry of judgment in defendants’ favor. The original opinion is adhered to as modified. The petition for reconsideration is allowed. The former opinion is modified and adhered to as modified.

______________ * * 360 Or 569, ____ P3d ____ (2016); 269 Or App 785, 347 P3d 788 (2015).

** Nakamoto, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this

case.808 Wels v. Hippe

LANDAU, J. Defendants have petitioned for reconsideration of our opinion in Wels v. Hippe , 360 Or 569, ___ P3d ___ (2016). Defendants prevailed but seek clarification of our instruc

tion remanding the case to the trial court for further pro

ceedings. Defendants assert that this instruction requires the trial court to vacate its original judgment in favor of plaintiff and enter judgment in favor of defendants, rather than holding a new trial and allowing plaintiff to present further evidence. We agree that clarification is warranted as follows: The case is remanded to the circuit court for entry of judgment in defendants’ favor, and the award of costs is modified accordingly. The petition for reconsideration is allowed. The for

mer opinion is modified and adhered to as modified.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5611

To ensure the availability of funds for ergonomic protection standards.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 1, 2000

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To ensure the availability of funds for ergonomic protection

standards.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ERGONOMIC

4 PROTECTION STANDARDS.

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, up to

6 $50,000,000 of the amounts otherwise appropriated to the

7 Occupational Safety and Health Administration for fiscal

8 year 2001 shall be available for the promulgation,

9 issuance, implementation, administration, and enforce-
2

•HR 5611 IH

1 ment of proposed, temporary, and final standards on ergo2 nomic protection.

Æ
§ 0.284 Actions taken under delegated authority. ( a ) In discharging the authority conferred by § 0.283 of this part, the Chief, Media Bureau, shall establish working relationships with other bureaus and staff offices to assure the effective coordination of actions taken in the following areas of joint responsibility; ( 1 ) Complaints arising under section 315 of the Communications Act—Office of General Counsel.
( 2 ) Requests for waiver of tower painting and lighting specifications-Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.
( 3 ) Requests for use of frequencies or bands of frequencies shared with private sector nonbroadcast or government services—Office of Engineering and Technology and appropriate operating bureau.
( 4 ) Requests involving coordination with other agencies of government—Office of General Counsel, Office of Engineering and Technology and appropriate operating bureau.
( 5 ) Proposals involving possible harmful impact on radio astronomy or radio research installations—Office of Engineering and Technology.
( b ) With respect to non-routine applications granted under authority delegated in § 0.283 of this part, the Chief, Media Bureau or his designees, shall enter on the working papers associated with each application a narrative justification of the action taken. While not available for public inspection, these working papers shall, upon request, be made available to the Commissioners and members of their staffs.
[47 FR 47829, Oct. 28, 1982; 47 FR 56852, Dec. 21, 1982, as amended at 51 FR 12615, Apr. 14, 1986; 52 FR 5288, Feb. 20, 1987; 59 FR 32132, June 22, 1994; 59 FR 67092, Dec. 28, 1994; 61 FR 8477, Mar. 5, 1996; 64 FR 60721, Nov. 8, 1999; 67 FR 13220, Mar. 21, 2002; 71 FR 69036, Nov. 29, 2006]
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–607

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 434, THE TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2000

MAY 4, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 489]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 489, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference

report to accompany H.R. 434, the Trade and Development Act of

2000, and against its consideration. The rule further provides that

the conference report shall be considered as read.

The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of clause 8 of

House rule XXII (requiring a three-day layover of a conference report) because the conference report was not filed until Thursday,

May 4, and may be considered by the House as early as Thursday,

May 4. The waiver of all points of order also includes a waiver of

clause 9 of rule XXII (violating the scope of the conference) because

the conference report includes provisions not committed to the conference committee by either chamber.

Æ
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Celulosa Arauco y Constitución S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

Date: June 22, 2011



/s/ Matías DomeykoName:

Matías DomeykoTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


Date: June 22, 2011



/s/ Robinson TajmuchName:

Robinson TajmuchTitle:

Comptroller Director
12/13/201 1 15:5 8 FA X 202493514 2 F AA ^ OH S 001/00 2 

# Dg M •j^RARTMFN TO F '"iAliSPORTATlO N .(^OKb TOPERATION S

I N TH E MATTE ROF : D & M CUSTO M INJECTIO N MOLDIN GCORPORATIO N / •- - '- I r



### - 20'. - TAADocke t

No . CPliai-OOO O Judg e Richar dC Goodwi n (p}bil ~ OLV ^ \r\r ~ •. .

RESPONS E T O COMPLAlNANT^ S MONTIO N T O DEE M ALLEGATIO N ADMITTE D AN D FO RJUDGEMEK T O N TH E PLEADING S O RFO RHEARIN GO N SANCTIO N ONL Y HEREWITH , th e responden t respectfully , (a ) take s n o objectio n l o grantin g th e Complainant' s motio n deemin g admissio n o f th e trut ho f th e complainant' s allegations ; (b ) request s ahearin g o n thi s matte r limite dt o th e issu e o f

sanctio n only . Respectfijll y submitted .
Michae l Teofilovich , Presiden t D & M Custo mInjectio n Moldin g Corporatio n db aD & M Plastic s Corporatio n 15 0 Frenc hRoa d Burlington , I L6010 912/13/201 1 15:5 8 FA X 202493514 2 ^f^ ^ . BU S (2002/00 2 

# D^ M D&MPrASriCSCX>RP . lyOVOOl & IS O {3485Cerririi-( | Decembers , 201 1 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ' " ' • " " - i-^ , 800 Independenc e Avenue , S W• '-— ^ -.„^ ' Washington , D C 2059 1 AtteniioniHearin g Docke t Cler k r;_

_C : 20't 1 Wilbu r Wngh t Building - Suite 2W100 0 Kat e Barbe r Attorney , Office o f

th e regiona

l Counse l A / • i / ^ Great Lake s Region , AGL-7 B ^6(1 " 0^1 / Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n / 230 0 Ea t Devo n Avenue DesPlaines,I L6001 8 Th e Honorabl e RichardC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judge s Office o f Hearing , M-2 0 US - Department

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jersey Avenue , S E Washingto aD C 2059 0

15( 1 Fr(?ncli Ro.id /

^0 . Go ^ l.'?^ ' BiirlJiiLiloi i H|rnoJ 5 6"M.i9-Oj.S K ' f^.p- , (SSi-Zd^- t

/ f.-ix ('K-l7MiH;f-27 '
# Comments on: Notice of Extension of Access Restrictions for the National Courts building
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20818
SHIRLEY SHIRLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS
KMART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CV-4416)

October 20, 1998 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, AND DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM * : AFFIRMED. See 5 th Cir. R. 47.6