alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5481 

5482 

5483 

5484 

5485 

5486 

5487 

5488 

5489 

5490 

5491 

5492 

5493 

5494 

5495 

5496 

5497 

5498 

5499 

5500 

5501 

5502 

5503 

5504 

5505 

5506 

5507 

5508 

5509 

5510 

5511 

5512 

5513 

5514 

5515 

5516 

5517 

5518 

5519 

5520 

5521 

5522 

5523 

5524 

5525 

5526 

5527 

5528 

5529 

5530 

5531 

5532 

5533 

5534 

5535 

5536 

5537 

5538 

5539 

5540 

5541 

5542 

5543 

5544 

5545 

5546 

5547 

5548 

5549 

5550 

5551 

5552 

5553 

5554 

5555 

5556 

5557 

5558 

5559 

5560 

5561 

5562 

5563 

5564 

5565 

5566 

5567 

5568 

5569 

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:21:20-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"23-1492: COLONIAL PRESS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"g24iuqC3zV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-20-2023-23-1492-colonial-press-international-inc-v-director-of-the-government-publishing-office-order-23-1492-order-6-20-2023_2144915\/\">23-1492: COLONIAL PRESS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-20-2023-23-1492-colonial-press-international-inc-v-director-of-the-government-publishing-office-order-23-1492-order-6-20-2023_2144915\/embed\/#?secret=g24iuqC3zV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“23-1492: COLONIAL PRESS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"g24iuqC3zV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: COLONIAL PRESS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 23-1492 Origin: BCA Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
§ 60-30.10 Production of documents and things and entry upon land for inspection and other purposes. ( a ) After commencement of the action, any party may serve on any other party a request to produce and/or permit the party, or someone acting on his behalf, to inspect and copy any unprivileged documents, phonorecords, and other compilations, including computer tapes and printouts which contain or may lead to relevant information and which are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served. If necessary, translation of data compilations shall be done by the party furnishing the information.
( b ) After commencement of the action, any party may serve on any other party a request to permit entry upon designated property which may be relevant to the issues in the proceeding and, which is in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection, measuring, surveying or photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or area.
( c ) Each request shall set forth with reasonable particularity the items to be inspected and shall specify a reasonable time and place for making the inspection and performing the related acts.
( d ) The party upon whom the request is served shall respond within 25 days after the service of the request. The response shall state, with respect to each item, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless there are objections, in which case the reasons for each objection shall be stated. The party submitting the request may move for an order with respect to any objection or to other failure to respond.
No. 10-11247.

#### Douglas *v.*Mills, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

REYNALDO FIGUEROA-ARDON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 526 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.814 Reports regarding free service rendered the Government for national defense.

Carriers rendering free service in connection with the national defense to any agency of the United States Government shall file reports in accordance with part 2 of this chapter.
**Proposed Revisions to Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters Public Hearing, Boston, MA -- February 26, 2014**  **Speaker List**

Last NameFirst Name Affiliation

GoldmanJack Hearth Patio & Barbecue Association Carroll Ryan Hearth Patio & Barbecue Association Suuberg Martin Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Seidman Nancy National Association of Clean Air Agencies Klein Mark Innovative Hearth Products Liu Owen Environmental Defense Miller Claire Toxics Action Center Hedrick Jennifer Pellet Fuels Institute Moore Frank Hardy Manufacturing Co., Inc. Kuhfahl David Hearthstone Stoves Perkins Chelsea Clean Air Council Seyler Jeff American Lung Association Aho Patricia Commissioner, Maine Department of Environmental Protection Nanasi Yvonne Moms Clean Air Force New Hampshire Feen Bob Feen's Country Living, Fitchburg, MA Crouch John Hearth Patio & Barbecue Association Haggard Calvin Breckwell VogelzangSteve Vogelzang International Williams Paul U.S. Stove Company Ackerly John Alliance for Green Heat Miller Edward American Lung Association Barry Brandon Vogelzang International FitzgeraldMike New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Niebling Charles New England Wood Pellet/Biomass Thermal Energy Council Hannah David Chimney Sweep Rector Lisa NESCAUM-Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management HallowellJeff ClearStak LLC Wiberg Chris Timber Products Inspection AldermanNancy Environment and Human Health VoorheesJohn Consultant Seymour Joseph Biomass Thermal Energy Council Pirolli Richard Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Bonar Ray Industrial Chimney Company, Inc. Allan Barbara Massachusetts Leadership Board of the American Lung Association Steinert John Dirigo Laboratories, Inc. Gagner Chuck Northwestern Manufacturing Dircks Peter Hearth & Home Technologies Henry Dan 5G3 Consulting Nelson Michael Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Mears David Commissioner, Vermont Dept of Environmental Conservation**Proposed Revisions to Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters Public Hearing, Boston, MA -- February 26, 2014**  **Speaker List**

Last NameFirst Name Affiliation

Berry Tom U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy's Office (Vermont) Hussong James Kozy Heat Remole Tim Representative, Missouri House of Representatives Watson Brett Jøtul North America, President Purinton Roger Jøtul North America MorrisseyThomas Woodstock Soapstone Company, Inc. Elliott Mike Central New England Chimney Sweeps BushwayStephen Masonry Heater Association of North America Poulin Bruce Janco Classic Wood Boiker TinnemoreRod Washington State Department of Ecology Kelly Benjamin Earth Outdoor Wood Furnaces Meeker John DBA WoodKiln Dover Dustin AgFuel Energy Systems Biber Joe Preston Trading Post Carroll Allen Applied Ceramics, Inc. and The Catalytic Hearth Coalition Barden Albert Maine Wood Heat Company PodreccaChris Chimney Sweep Professionals Neufeld Chris Blaze King Industries Nichols Scott Tarm Biomass
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON :

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,

http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center,

U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, gpo@custhelp.com.

61–613 PDF 2010

S. Hrg. 111–691 

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE 

ON THE ARTICLES AGAINST 

JUDGE G. THOMAS PORTEOUS, JR. 

HEARINGS

BEFORE THE

SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL 

COMMITTEE 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

ON

THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST JUDGE G. THOMAS 

PORTEOUS, JR., A JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 

November 16, 2010 

Volume 1 of 3, Part B 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate 
ii

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE ON THE ARTICLES 

AGAINST JUDGE G. THOMAS PORTEOUS, JR. 

CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri, Chairman

ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Vice Chairman 

AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota 

SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island 

TOM UDALL, New Mexico 

JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire 

EDWARD E. KAUFMAN, Delaware 

JIM DEMINT, South Carolina 

JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming 

ROGER WICKER, Mississippi 

MIKE JOHANNS, Nebraska 

JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho 

COMMITTEE STAFF 

DERRON R. PARKS, Staff Director and Chief Counsel 

THOMAS L. JIPPING, Deputy Staff Director and Deputy Chief Counsel 

JUSTIN KIM, Counsel

REBECCA S. SEIDEL, Counsel

ERIN P. JOHNSON, Deputy Counsel and Chief Clerk 

LAKE DISHMAN, Professional Staff Member 

CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE STAFF 

SUSAN NAVARRO SMELCER, Analyst on the Federal Judiciary 

SENATE LEGAL COUNSEL STAFF 

MORGAN J. FRANKEL, Senate Legal Counsel 

PATRICIA MACK BRYAN, Deputy Senate Legal Counsel 

GRANT R. VINIK, Assistant Senate Legal Counsel 

THOMAS E. CABALLERO, Assistant Senate Legal Counsel 
iii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Committee gratefully acknowledges the high standard of professionalism and 

long hours of dedicated service of its staff. The Committee also expresses its appreciation to Lynden C. Armstrong, Chief Clerk of the Committee on Rules and Administration, and to the following staff of Committee members: 

STAFF OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS 

Senator MCCASKILL, Chairman, Derron R. Parks 

Senator HATCH, Vice Chairman, Thomas L. Jipping 

Senator KLOBUCHAR, Paige Herwig 

Senator WHITEHOUSE, Stephen C. N. Lilley and Justin G. Florence 

Senator UDALL, Matthew T. Nelson 

Senator SHAHEEN, Thomas J. Maloney 

Senator KAUFMAN, Nhan Nguyen 

Senator DEMINT, Erica Suares 

Senator BARRASSO, Bryn Stewart 

Senator WICKER, Emily Ferris 

Senator JOHANNS, Sarah Novascone 

Senator RISCH, Jason Bohrer 

INTERNS

Christian Dibblee 

Timothy Holman 

Hannah Lockhart 

Annie Moulton 

Michael Naclerio 

Patrick Sadler
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-2348: LKQ CORPORATION v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7pzedSSy2K\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-20-2023-21-2348-lkq-corporation-v-gm-global-technology-operations-llc-opinion-21-2348-opinion-1-20-2023_2066528\/\">21-2348: LKQ CORPORATION v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-20-2023-21-2348-lkq-corporation-v-gm-global-technology-operations-llc-opinion-21-2348-opinion-1-20-2023_2066528\/embed\/#?secret=7pzedSSy2K\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-2348: LKQ CORPORATION v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"7pzedSSy2K\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: LKQ CORPORATION v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-2348 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4241

To amend title 5, United States Code, to require the use of standardized

claim forms under the health benefits program for Federal employees,

and to amend title 10, United States Code, to require the use of such

forms in the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed

Services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 18, 1994

Mrs. SCHROEDER introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to

the Committees on Armed Services and Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to require the use

of standardized claim forms under the health benefits

program for Federal employees, and to amend title 10,

United States Code, to require the use of such forms

in the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Insurance Form Sim5 plification Act’’.
2

•HR 4241 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS PRO2 GRAM.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8902 of title 5, United

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow5 ing:

6 ‘‘(o) A claim for payment or reimbursement under

7 this chapter shall be submitted in a standard form (as pre8 scribed in regulations under section 8913). Each contract

9 under this chapter shall include appropriate provisions to

10 carry out the preceding sentence.’’.

11 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub12 section (a) shall apply with respect to claims relating to

13 benefits received after the end of the 6-month period be14 ginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

15 SEC. 3. CIVILIAN HEALTH AND MEDICAL PROGRAM OF THE

16 UNIFORMED SERVICES.

17 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1079(h) of title 10, Unit18 ed States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol19 lowing:

20 ‘‘(3) A claim for payment or reimbursement under

21 a plan contracted for under subsection (a) or section 1086

22 of this title shall be submitted in a standard form (as pre23 scribed in regulations issued by the administering Sec24 retaries). Each such contract shall include appropriate

25 provisions to carry out the preceding sentence.’’.
3

•HR 4241 IH

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub2 section (a) shall apply with respect to claims relating to

3 benefits received after the end of the 6-month period be4 ginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
No. 11-9191.

#### Givens *v.*Main Street Financial Services Corp. et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9121.

#### Hunter *v.*Bowden et al.

Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.
044P15

#### Jo Ann Ward v. Mark E. Fogel and William B. Wright, Jr., as Co-Trustees under certain trust agreements dated February 1, 2005 and January 1, 2006, et al.

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-417)

Denied
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4424

To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel for employment

in the coastwise trade and fisheries of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1994

Mr. GILCHREST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel

for employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries of

the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding sections 12105, 12106, 12107, and

4 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of

5 the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883),

6 as applicable on the date of this Act, the Secretary of the

7 Department in which the Coast Guard is operating may

8 issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel SAL9 LIE–D (Maryland certification number MD2655AA).

Æ
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-329 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL 

COOPERATION 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and KOSOVO 

Signed at Pristina March 29, 2012 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
KOSOVO 

Economic and Technical Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Pristina March 29, 2012; 

 Entered into force March 29, 2012.
Rebecca



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 13, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00854

- CV

Norris J. DEVOLL

, Appellant

v.

Rebecca DEMONBREUN and William Dowds, Appellee s

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 15237 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant Norris J. Devoll has filed a notice stating that he is in bankruptcy. The notice states that the bankruptcy proceeding is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the

Western District of Texas in San Antonio , under Case No. 15

- 40122G , styled In re: Norris J.

Devoll . The notice contains an authenticated copy of the page[s] of the bankruptcy petition showing that the petition was filed on January 7, 2015 . Accor dingly, the appeal and all time periods are stayed from the date the bankruptcy petition was filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2.

It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is ABATED . For administrative purposes, the appeal will be treated as a closed case

, unless and until it is reinstated in accordance with Rule 8.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of January, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Moscow CableCom Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Mikhail A. Smirnov, Chief Executive Officer, and Tate Fite, Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Moscow CableCom Corp.



|October 24, 2006 | /s/    MIKHAIL A. SMIRNOV
|---------------- | -------------------------
|                 | Mikhail A. Smirnov       
|                 | Chief Executive Officer  
|October 24, 2006 | /s/    Tate Fite         
|                 | Tate Fite                
|                 | Chief Financial Officer  





This certification shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Comments on: 18-1790: SPITZ TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION v. NOBEL BIOCARE USA, LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




The
      Board
      of Directors




Capital
      Corp of the West:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
      (No. 333-41440) on Form S-8 of Capital Corp of the West of our reports
      dated March 13, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
      Capital Corp of the West and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004,
      and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,
      shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
      period ended December 31, 2005, management’s assessment of the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
      December 31, 2005, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the
      December 31, 2005, annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Corp of the
      West.













/s/
      KPMG
      LLP






Sacramento,
      California






March 13,
      2006