**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO)**  **(Renewal) 1. Identification of the Information Collection**  **1(a) Title of the Information Collection**  NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal), EPA I CR Number 2071.06 , OMB Control Number 2060

- 0522

. **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The National Emission St andards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles were proposed on July 11, 2002, promulgated on May 29, 2003 , and amended on April 4, 2004 and May 24, 2006

. These regulations appl y to each existin g, new, or reconstructed source involved in printing, coating, slashing, dyeing or finishing of fabric and other textiles. New facilities include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This information is being col lected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of an y startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility , or any period during which the monitoring sy stem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP. Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority

. In the event that there is no such delegated authority , the reports are sent directl y to the U

. S

. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office. Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of one affected facility at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site). The “Affected Public” are private sector businesses that coat fabrics and textiles. The

“burden ” to the “Affected Public” may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fab rics and other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)

. The Federal Government “burden ” is attributed entirel y to work performed b y either F ederal employees or government contractors and may be found below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)

.2

Over the next three ye ars, we estimate 14 6 respondents per ye ar will be subject to the standard . The estimate consists of 72 coating and printing sources, and 74 slashing, dyeing, and finishing sources. We also estimate one additional coating and printing source per year will become subject to the standard. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the currentl y active I CR wi thout any

“Terms of Clearance.”
**2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any

owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintai n such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, duri ng such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certification s in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y require. In the Administrator's judgment , hazardous air pollutant (HAP ) emissions from printing, coating and dyeing of fabrics and other textiles facilities cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably

be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP standards were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO

. **2(b) Practical U tility/Users of the Data**  The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard s ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which w ere promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting in spections and as evidence in legal proceedings. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’ s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard s . Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the stand ard s at all times. During the performance test a record of3

the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor. The notifications required in the standard s are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properl y installe d and operated , leaks are being detected and repaired , and the standard s are being met. The performance test may also be observed. The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility , verif y operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations.
**3. Non**
**- duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria**  The requested recordkeeping an d reporting are required under 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO

. **3(a) Non**
**- duplication**  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, duplication does not exist. **3(b) Pub lic Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB**  An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the Federal Register ( 79 FR 30117 ) on May 27, 2014 . No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations** The Agency

has consulted i ndustry

experts and internal data sources to project the number of affected facilities and industry growth over the next three years. The primary source of information as reported by industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Integrated Compliance Information Sy stem (I CI S). I CI S is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for industrial and governme nt

- owned facilities. The growth rate for the industry is based on our consultations with the Agency ’s internal industry experts. Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard as it was being developed. In developing4

this I CR, we contacted both the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO) , at (202) 822

- 8026 , and the American Association of Textile Chemists & Colorists (AATCC) , at (919) 549

- 8141

. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice.
**3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection** Less frequent information collecti on would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility

of detecting violations would be less likely

. **3(e) General Guidelines**
T hes e reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR Part 1320, Section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least fiv e years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five

- ye ar records retention requirement is consistent with the Part 70 permit program and the five

- ye ar statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. T he retention of records for five years allow s EPA to establish the compliance history of a source , an y pattern of non - compliance and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violato rs have violations extending beyond five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records

. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, Septe mber 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

**3(g) Sensitive Questions**
T he reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive5

questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested**
**4 (a) Respondents/SIC Codes**  The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are facilities involved in printing, coating and dyeing of fabrics and other textiles . The United States Standard Industrial Classification ( SI C ) code s for the res pondents affected by the standards and the corresponding North American Industry Classification System (NAICS ) codes are listed in the table below

. **Standard (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) SIC Codes**  **NAICS Codes** Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Cotton 2211 313210 Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Manmade Fiber and Silk 2221 313210 Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Wool (including dyeing and finishing) 2231 313210 Textile Goods, NEC (broadwoven fabrics of jute, linen, hemp, and ramie and hand woven fabrics) 2299 313210 Narrow Fabric and Other Smallware Mills; Cotton, Wool, silk and Manmade Fiber 2241 313221 Textile Goods, NEC (narrow woven fabric of jute, linen, hemp, and ramie) 2299 313221 Knitting Mills, NEC (knitting weft fabric and fabricating textile products, such as bedspreads, curtains, or towels 2259 313241 Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Wool (wool broadwoven fabric finishing without weaving fabric) 2231 313311 Finishers of Broadwoven Fabrics of Cotton 2261 313311 Finishers of Broadwoven Fabrics of Manmade Fiber and Silk 2262 313311 Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Wool (wool fabric, except broadwoven, finishing without weaving fabric) 2231 313312 Knit Outerwear Mills (dyeing and finishing knit outerwear without knitting outerwear) 2253 313312 Knit Underwear and Nightwear Mills (dyeing and finishing underwear and nightwear without knitting garments) 2254 313312 Weft Knit Fabric Mills (finishing weft fabric without knitting weft fabric) 2257 313312 Lace and Warp Fabric Mills (Finishing lace or warp fabric without knitting lace or warp fabric) 2258 3133126

Finishers of Textiles, NEC (except linen fabric finishing) 2269 313312 Thread Mills (finishing thread without manufacturing thread) 2284 313312 Textile Goods, NEC (finishing hard fiber thread and yarn without manufacturing thread or yarn) 2299 313312 Coated Fabrics, Not Rubberized 2295 313320 Fabricated Rubber Products, NEC (rubberizing fabric or purchased textile products) 3069 313320 Carpets and Rugs 2273 314110 Rubber and Plastics Hose and Belting 3052 326220 Gaskets, Packing, and Sealing Devices 3053 339991 Fabricated Rubber Products, NEC (rubberizing fabric or purchased textile products) 3069 313320
**4(b) Information Requested (i) Data Items** 
In this ICR , all the data that is recorded or reported is required b y the NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO)

. A source must make the following reports:

**Notification s**  Initial notification 63.9(b), 63.4310(b) Notification of intent to construction/reconstruction 63.9(b)(4), 63.4310 Notification of anticipated startup 63.9(b)(4), 63.4310 Notification of actual startup 63.9(b)(4), 63.4310 Request for extension of compliance date 63.9(c), 63.4283 Notification of performance test 63.9(e), 63.6310 Notification of compliance status 63.9(h)(2), 63.4310 Continuous monitoring sy stem 63.9(h)
**Reports** Performance test report 63.10(d)(2), 63.4311 Startup, shutdown, malfunction (SSM) report 63.6.(e)(3),7 **Reports** 63.4311 Excess emissions or no excess emissions report 63.10(e)(3), 63.4311 A source must keep the following records:
**Recordkeeping** Record of startup, shutdown, and malfunctions 63.6(e)(3), 63.4311 Records are required to be retained for five years 63.10(b)(2) Electronic Reporting Some of the r espondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at a plant site. **(ii) Respondent Activities**
**Respondent Activities** Familiarization with the regulatory requirements. Install, calibrate , maintain, and operate CMS for opacity , or for pressure drop and liquid supply pressure for control device. Perform initial performance test, Reference Method 204, 204A, 204B, 204D or E test s , and repeat performance tests if necessary. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and providing in formation.8 **Respondent Activities** Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management**  **5(a) Agency Activities**  EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analy sis, storage, and distribution of the required information.
**Agency Activities** Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in Integrated Compliance Information System (I CI S) and ECHO. **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are p roperl y installed and operated. Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a source ’ s initial capability to comp ly with the emission standard and note the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. T he semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations

. In formation contained in the reports is reported b y state and local governments in the IC IS Air database which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. IC IS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses IC IS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by

local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated a

uthorities can edit, store, retrieve and anal yz e the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator fo r five ye ars.9

**5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** A majority

of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the ty pes of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger busines ses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. **5(d) Collection Schedule** The specific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)

. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where app ropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirement s is estimated to be 22, 400 hours ( Total Labor Hours from Table 1 below ). T hese hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously

approved ICR, and any

comments received.

**6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs**  **(i) Estimating Labor Costs** This I CR uses the following labor rates:10 Managerial $ 129

. 93 ($ 61.87 + 110%) Technical $ 103

. 97 ($ 49.51 + 110%) Clerical $ 5 1

. 79 ($2 4

. 66 + 110%) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 2014 , “ Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, “ Total compensation. ” The rates have been increased b y 110 pe rcent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs** The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subjec t standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/startup costs are one

- time costs that occur when a facility

becomes subject to the regulation s . The annual operatio n and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor and other costs such as photocopying and postage.

**(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**

**Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs** (A) Continuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Number of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F) 1

Parametric mo nitoring (contractor) $2,953 1 $2,95 3 $26 14 6 $3, 796

**TOTAL (rounded)**  **$2,950 $3,800** 

1 Totals have been rounded to 3 significant values. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are $ 2,95 0 . This is the total o f column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance ( O&M) costs for this I CR are $ 3, 800

. This is the total of column G. The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $ 6, 750

. **6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost** The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforceme nt program i ncludes activities such as the11

examination of records maint ained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 50, 200

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $ 6 2. 90 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 9.31 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 67 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 2 9

. 17 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5. 25 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 78 + 60% ) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 20 1 5 General Schedule , which excludes locality

rates of pay

. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees
. Details u pon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)

. **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs**  Based on our research for this I CR, on average over the next three ye ars, approximately 145 existing respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that an additional one respondent per year will become subject. The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below, is 146 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR :12 **Number of Respondents** Respondents That Submit Reports Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports

Year (A) Number of Ne w Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 1 144 0 0 145
2 1 145 0 0 146
3 1 146 0 0 147 Average 1 145 0 0 146 1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities. C olumn D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents

. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 146

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table:
**Total Annual Responses** (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D

Initial notification 1 1 0 1 Application of construction/reconstruction 1 1 0 1 Notification of anticipated startup 1 1 0 1 Notification of actual startup 1 1 0 1 Notification of compliance status 1 1 0 1 Notification of performance test 1 1 0 1 Performance test report 1 1 0 1 Report of monitoring exceedances 1 7 .2 2 0 14 .4 Report of no excess 64.8 2 0 12 9. 613 **Total Annual Responses**
emissions 1 Startup, shutdown, malfunction report2 7 .2 2 0 14 .4 Report of compliance deviation 3 7. 4 2 0 14.8 Report of no compliance deviations 3 66.6 2 0 133.2 Total 313
1 It is assumed that 10 percent of the 69 coating and printing sources will report monitoring exceedances semiannually. The remaining 90 percent will have no excess emissions. 2 It is assumed that 10 percent of the 69 coating and printing sources will file startup, shutdown, malfunction reports semiannually. 3 It is assumed that 10 percent of the 74 slashing, dyeing and finishing sources will report compliance deviations semiannually. The remaining 90 percent will have no deviations

. The number of Total Annual Responses is 313

. The total annual labor costs are $2, 250 ,000

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)

. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectivel y, and summariz ed below. **(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 22, 400 hours, at a cost of $2,250,000

. Details regarding these estimates may

be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)

. We assume that burdens for managerial tasks take 5% of the time required for technical tasks because the ty

pical tasks for managers are to review and approve reports. Clerical burdens are assumed to take 10% of the time required for technical tasks because the ty pical duties of clerical staff are to proofread the reports, make copies and maintain records. Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this colle ction of information is estimated to average 72 hours per response

. The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $6, 750

. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.14
**(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 1,100 labor hours at a cost of $50, 200 . See below Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)

. We assume that burdens for managerial tasks take 5% of the time required for technical tasks because the ty

pical tasks for managers are to review and approve reports. Clerical burde ns are assumed to take 10% of the time required for technical tasks because the ty pical duties of clerical staff are to proofread the reports, make copies and maintain records. **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** There is an adjustment increase in the respondent and Agency burden, including an increase in the O&M cost. This is not due to any program changes; rather, it is due to an increase in the estimated number of sources. We assume an additional coating and pri nting facility will become subject to the rule each year. In addition, we have updated all burden calculations using the latest labor rates, which contributes to an increase in cost. There is a small apparent decrease in the Agency labor hours due to rounding. In this ICR, we rounded the total annual burdens and costs to 3 significant values. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 72 hours per response. Burd en means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to compl y with any previously

applicable instru ctions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor , and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2014

- 0092

. An electronic version of the public docket is15

available at http://www.regulations.gov/ , which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically

. When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The document s are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), WJC West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open f

rom 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the docket center i s (202) 566

- 17 52

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of In for mation and Regulatory

Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2014

- 0092 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0522 in any correspondenc e. **Part B of the Supporting Statement** This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.16

**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost** 

**– NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and other Textiles (40**  **CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)**

**Burden item (A)**  **Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrence**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person**
  ** hours per** **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondent per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical Person** 
**- hours per**  **year (E=CxD)**  **(F)**

**Managem ent**  **person**   ** hours per** **year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person**  **- hours per**  **year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost, $ b** 

1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Familiarization with rule requirement 4 1 4 146 584 29.2 58.4 $67,536.97 B. Required activities Initial oxidizer performance test **c, e** 280 1 280 1 280 14 28 $32,380.74 Repeat oxidizer performance test **c, e, f**  280 1 280 0.2 56 2.8 5.6 $6,476.15 Initial capture performance test **c, e** 215 1 215 1 215 10.75 21.5 $24,863.78 Repeat capture performance test **c, e, f**  215 1 215 0.2 43 2.15 4.3 $4,972.76 Startup, shutdown, malfunction plan **c** 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $4,625.82 Solvent recovery system compliance determination **c, p** 4 12 48 14.4 691.2 34.56 69.12 $79,934.17 Emission rate limit compliance determination 4 12 48 146 7,008 350.4 700.8 $810,443.66 Coordination with suppliers **g** 40 1 40 146 5,840 292 584 $675,369.72 C. Create information See 4B17

**Burden item (A)**  **Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrence**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person**
  ** hours per** **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondent per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical Person** 
**- hours per**  **year (E=CxD)**  **(F)**

**Managem ent**  **person**   ** hours per** **year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person**  **- hours per**  **year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost, $ b** 

D. Gather existing information See 4B E. Write report Initial notification c 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $231.29 Notification of construction/reconstruction **c** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $231.29 Notification of anticipated startup **c** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $231.29 Notification of actual startup **c** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $231.29 Notification of compliance status c 4 1 4 1 4 0.2 0.4 $462.58 Notification of performance test **c,**
**e** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $231.29 Performance test report **c, e**  40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $4,625.82 Report of monitoring exceedances **c, h, k**  16 2 32 7.2 230.4 11.52 23.04 $26,644.72 Report of no excess emissions **c, i, k**  8 2 16 64.8 1,037 51.84 103.68 $119,901.25 Startup, shutdown, malfunction report **c, j, k** 8 2 16 7.2 115.2 5.76 11.52 $13,322.36 Report of compliance deviation **d, k, l**  16 2 32 7.4 236.8 11.84 23.68 $27,384.85 Report of no compliance deviations **d, k**

**, m** 8 2 16 66.6 1,066 53.28 106.56 $123,231.84 **Subtotal for Reporting Requirements 20,120**  **$2,023,333.67** 4. Recordkeeping Requirements18

**Burden item (A)**  **Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrence**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person**
  ** hours per** **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondent per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical Person** 
**- hours per**  **year (E=CxD)**  **(F)**

**Managem ent**  **person**   ** hours per** **year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person**  **- hours per**  **year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost, $ b** 

A. Familiarization with rule requirement See 4B B. Plan activities N/A C. Implement activities N/A D. Develop record system N/A E. Time to enter information Records of all information required by standards **n** 0.25 52 13 146 1,898 94.9 189.8 $219,495.16 F. Time to train personnel N/A G. Time to adjust existing ways to comply with previously applicable requirements N/A
H. Time to transmit or disclose information **o** 0.25 2 0.5 146 73 3.65 7.3 $8,442.12 I. Time for audits N/A **Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements**  **2,267 $227,937.28**  **TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST**  **q 22,400**  **$2,250,000 Capital and O&M Cost (see Section**  **6(b)(iii)): q**  **$6,7 5**  **0 TOTAL COST:**  **q $2,2**  **6 0,000** 

**Assu mptions:** 

a We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be subject to the rule will be 14 6 , w hich equates to 72 coating and printing sources, and 7 419

slashing, dyeing, and finishing sources. There will be one additional new source per year that will become subject to the rule over the three

- year period of this ICR. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $129. 93 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $103.97 per hour for Technical labor, and $51.79 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 2014, “Table 2: Civ ilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total Compensation.” The rates have been increa sed by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.

c This applies only to coating and printing facilities. d This applies only to slashing, dyeing and finishing facilities. e Occurs one time for new sources and involves one

- time startup costs associated with initial compliance determination and acquisi tion, installation, and utilization of technology and systems needed to support recordkeeping and reporting. f It is assumed that 20 percent of respondents will have to repeat performance tests. g We have assumed that it will take 40 hours for each respondent to coordinate with suppliers. h We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will report monitoring exceedances. i We have assumed that 90 percent of respondents will report no excess e missions. j We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will file a startup, shutdown, malfunction reports. k Semiannual reports are required. l It is assumed that 10 percent of respondents will report compliance deviations.

m It is assumed that 90 percent of respondents will report no compliance deviations.

n It is assumed that all of the respondents will be required to record information on a weekly basis.

o It is assumed that respondents will be required to transmit/disc lose information on a semiannual basis. p It is assumed that 20 percent of the coating and printing facilities will use solvent recovery equipment. q Totals have been rounded to 3 significant values. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.20

**Tabl e 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost** 

**– NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and other Textiles (40**  **CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)**

**Activity (A)**  **EPA person**  **** **hours per occurrence**  **(B)**

**No. of occurrences**  **per plant per year**  **(C)**

**EPA person**  **hours per**  **plant per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Plants per**  **year a**  **(E)**

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person**   ** hours per** **year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person**  **** **hours per**  **year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost, $ b** 

1. Initial performance test **c** 495 1 495 1 495 24.75 49.5 $25,908.30 2. Repeat performance test preparations **c, e** 4 0.1 0.4 1 0.4 0.02 0.04 $20.94 3. Repeat performance test **c, e** 495 0.1 49.5 1 49.5 2.475 4.95 $2,590.83 4. Report Review Notification of applicability 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $104.68 Notification of construction/ reconstruction 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $104.68 Notification of anticipated startup 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $104.68 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $104.68 Notification of initial performance test **c** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $104.68 Notification of compliance status **c** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $104.68 Review of initial performance test report **c** 8 1 8 1 8 0.4 0.8 $418.72 Review of repeat performance test report **c, f** 8 0.1 0.8 1 0.8 0.04 0.08 $41.87 Review of excess emissions report **c, g** 8 1 8 7.2 57.6 2.88 5.76 $3,014.78 Review of no excess emissions report **c, h** 2 1 2 64.8 129.6 6.48 12.96 $6,783.26 Review of startup, shutdown, malfunction reports **c, i** 2 1 2 7.2 14.4 0.72 1.44 $753.70 Review of com pliance deviations report **d, j** 8 1 8 7.4 59.2 2.96 5.92 $3,098.53 Review of no compliance deviations reports **d, k** 2 1 2 66.6 133.2 6.66 13.32 $6,971.6921

**Activity (A)**  **EPA person**  **** **hours per occurrence**  **(B)**

**No. of occurrences**  **per plant per year**  **(C)**

**EPA person**  **hours per**  **plant per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Plants per**  **year a**  **(E)**

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person**   ** hours per** **year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person**  **** **hours per**  **year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost, $ b** 

**TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST l**  **1,100 $50,**  **2 00** 

**Assu mptions:** 

a We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be subject to the rule will be 146 , w hich equates to 72 coating and printing sources, and 74 slashing, dyeing, and finishing sources. There will be one additional new source per year that will become subject to the rule over the three

- year period of this ICR. b This cost is based on the following labor rates w hich incorporate a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: Managerial rate of $62.90 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $39.31 x 1.6), Technical rate of $46.67 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $29.17 x 1.6), and Clerical rate of $25.25 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $15.78 x 1.6). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2015 General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay.

c This applies only to coating and printing facilities. d Th is applies only to slashing, dyeing and finishing facilities.

e We have assumed that 10 percent of new sources will have to repeat performance test preparations and testing. f Assume that 10 percent of new sources will review the repeat performance te st report. g We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will be engaged in the revie wing of excess emissions reports. h We have assumed that 90 percent of respondents will be engaged in the revie wing of no excess emissions reports. i We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will have to review the startup, shutdown, malfunction reports. j We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will review the compliance deviations report. k We have assumed that 90 percent of respond ents will review the no compliance deviations report. l Totals have been rounded to 3 significant values. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.