alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1961: In Re GO & ASSOCIATES, LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vLD92HbojZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-13-2023-22-1961-in-re-go-associates-llc-opinion-22-1961-opinion-11-13-2023_2220683\/\">22-1961: In Re GO & ASSOCIATES, LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-13-2023-22-1961-in-re-go-associates-llc-opinion-22-1961-opinion-11-13-2023_2220683\/embed\/#?secret=vLD92HbojZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1961: In Re GO & ASSOCIATES, LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"vLD92HbojZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: In Re GO & ASSOCIATES, LLC [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1961 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
# Comments on: 23-1626: BLAIR v. DVA [ORDER], Nonprecedential
#### *Commonwealth v. Yates’ Adm’r.

January Term, 1853,

Richmond.

(Absent Lee, J.)

1. Revolution Officer — Claim for Half Pay — Failure-Effect. — A claim for half pay for life as surgeon’s mate to one of the regiments of the Virginia continental establishment during the revolutionary war, rejected; there not being satisfactory proof that he served to the end of the war.

2. Same — Same—Statute—Effect.—An officer becoming a supernumerary after the passage of the act of 1778, stands on the same footing as .to his claim for commutation or half pay for life, as one becoming a supernumerary before the passage of that act.

This was an application by Daniel Ward, administrator de bonis non with the will annexed of Dr. George Yates deceased, in the alternative, either for commutation of five years’ full pay, or of half pay for life, for the services of said Yates as surgeon’s mate in the Virginia continental establishment during the revolutionary war. The auditor rejected the claim; but upon appeal to the Circuit court of Henrico, that court held that he was entitled to half pay for life, and directed the auditor to deliver to the administrator a warrant on the treasury of the commonwealth for the said half pay from the 22d of April 1783 until the death of Yates, which occurred in March 1788. From this judgment the attorney general applied to this court for a supersedeas, which was allowed.

This court did not consider that the evidence showed satisfactorily that Dr. Yates had served until the end of the war, though it showed that he served to the end of the year 1782.

The Attorney General, for the appellant.

John M. Patton, Jr., for the appellee.

*DANIEL, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court. *351The court is of the opinion that the testimony in the cause is too vague and indefinite to establish the fact that George Yates, the testator of the appellee, served to the end of the war, and therefore that the claim for pay, so far as it rested on such pretensions, was properly rejected by the auditor. The court is also further of opinion that this effort to vindicate the claim on the score of the said Yates being a supernumerary, is met by the decisions of this court in the cases of Tatam’s ex’or v. The Commonwealth, 9 Leigh 56; Slaughter’s adm’r v. The Commonwealth, 2 Gratt. 391; and The Commonwealth v. Peyton’s adm’r, Id. 393.

The court is therefore of opinion that the order and judgment of the Circuit court of the 18th of June 1849 is erroneous, and ought to be reversed, and that the decision of the auditor rejecting the claim should be affirmed.

Judgment reversed.
No. 10-11267.

#### Gary *v.*Jones, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### § 301-52.15 What must I do with any passenger coupon for transportation costing over $75, purchased with cash?

You must submit the passenger coupons to your agency in accordance with your agency's procedures.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

         In connection with Bancshares of Florida, Inc.’s (“Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 (“Report”),the undersigned certifies that:

|   | 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                    |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|   | 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the period ended, September 30, 2002. |

|                                    |   |      |
|------------------------------------|--------|-----------|
| Date:  November 12, 2002 |   | By:  | /s/ MICHAEL L. MCMULLAN |
|                                    |        |           |    **Michael L. McMullan****President and Chief Executive Officer**  |
No. 11-784.

#### Al Kassar et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.7000 Purpose. The purposes of this subpart are to set out the terms by which certain commercial and government-controlled entities report data to the Commission concerning: ( a ) The provision of wired and wireless local telephone services and interconnected Voice over internet Protocol services;
( b ) The deployment of advanced telecommunications capability, as defined in 47 U.S.C. 1302, and services that are competitive with advanced telecommunications capability; and
( c ) The availability and quality of service of broadband internet access service.
[85 FR 50907, Aug. 18, 2020]
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Kristian Laflash v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 006 00

- CR

Trial court case number: CR 13 69 3

Trial court: 355th District Court of H ood County

On August 15 , 2019, we abated the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court

for the appointment of new appellate counsel. The trial court clerk has filed a supplemental

clerk’s record that includes the trial court’s order appointing Teresa McGonagill to

represen t appellant on appeal. Accordingly, we reinstate this case on the Court’s active

docket.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to note Teresa McGonagill’s appearance as

appointed counsel for appellant on the docket of this Court.

Appellant’s brief is due to be filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the

date of this order

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ August 27, 2019

__
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4543 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 195

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4543

                          [Report No. 103-636]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at 907 
Richland Street in Columbia, South Carolina, as the ``Matthew J. Perry, 
                    Jr. United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 195
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4543

                          [Report No. 103-636]

  To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at 907 
Richland Street in Columbia, South Carolina, as the ``Matthew J. Perry, 
                    Jr. United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1994

 Mr. Clyburn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

                             August 1, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at 907 
Richland Street in Columbia, South Carolina, as the ``Matthew J. Perry, 
                    Jr. United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse to be constructed at 907 Richland 
Street in Columbia, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Matthew J. Perry, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Matthew J. 
Perry, Jr. United States Courthouse''.
```
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Supply and License Agrrement



 Exhibit 10.16 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED SUPPLY AND LICENSE AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED SUPPLY AND LICENSE AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), dated effective as
of November 22, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), is by and among: 
  

	 	(i)	MAYNE PHARMA VENTURES PTY LTD, an Australian company ACN 168 896 357 (“Mayne Pharma”); and 

  

	 	(ii)	HEDGEPATH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware corporation (“HPPI”). 


WHEREAS, Mayne Pharma and HPPI (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to that certain Second Amended and Restated
Supply and License Agreement, dated May 15, 2015 (the “SLA”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend
the SLA on the terms and conditions set forth herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt, and legal
adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, and pursuant to Section 26.8 of the SLA, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree to amend the SLA as of the Effective Date as follows: 

1. Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in
the SLA. 
 2. Extension to the Target Launch Date. The parties agree to extend the Target Launch Date to 31 December
2018. 
 3. No Further Amendment. Except as amended hereby, the SLA shall remain unmodified and in full force and effective.

 4. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of
Delaware applicable to agreements made and to be performed wholly within such State, without regard to its conflict of law rules. 
 5.
Headings; Counterparts. The headings contained in this Amendment are inserted for reference purposes only and shall not in any way affect the meaning, construction or interpretation of this Amendment. This Amendment may be executed in
two (2) counterparts, each of which, when executed, shall be deemed to be an original, but both of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same document. Such counterparts may be executed and delivered by facsimile/e-mail
transmission, which shall constitute valid execution and delivery. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this
Amendment as of the date first above written. 
  

									
		 		 	MAYNE PHARMA VENTURES PTY LTD
				
		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Scott A. Richards
		 		 		 	Name:	 	Scott A. Richards
		 		 		 	Title:	 	Director
			
		 		 	HEDGEPATH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
				
		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Nicholas J. Virca
		 		 		 	Name:	 	Nicholas J. Virca
		 		 		 	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer

 [Signature Page to Amendment No. 1 to 

Second Amended and Restated Supply and License Agreement]
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4429

AMENDMENTS
In the Senate of the United States,

July 15 (legislative day, July 11), 1994.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 4429) entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize the transfer

of naval vessels to certain foreign countries’’ do pass with the

following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Ω1æPage 1, strike out lines 5 to 10

2 Ω2æPage 2, line 1, strike out ø(b) AUSTRALIA.—The¿

3 and insert: (a) AUSTRALIA.—Subject to section 6, the

4 Ω3æPage 2, line 8, strike out ø(c) BRAZIL.—The¿ and

5 insert: (b) BRAZIL.—Subject to section 6, the

6 Ω4æPage 2, strike out all after line 14, over to and in7 cluding line 2 on page 3

8 Ω5æPage 3, line 3, strike out ø(f) MOROCCO.—The¿ and

9 insert: (c) MOROCCO.—Subject to section 6, the
2

HR 4429 EAS

1 Ω6æPage 3, line 10, strike out ø(g) SPAIN.—The¿ and

2 insert: (d) SPAIN.—Subject to section 6, the

3 Ω7æPage 3, lines 12 and 13, strike out øships HARLAN

4 COUNTY (LST 1196) and¿ and insert: ship

5 Ω8æPage 3, lines 13 and 14, strike out øtransfers¿ and

6 insert: transfer

7 Ω9æPage 3, strike out all after line 15, over to and in8 cluding line 6 on page 4

9 Ω10æPage 4, line 13, after ‘‘provision’’ insert: of law

10 Ω11æPage 4, line 18, after ‘‘provision’’ insert: of law

11 Ω12æPage 5, after line 19, insert:

12 SEC. 6. CONDITION FOR TRANSFER.

13 No vessel may be transferred under this Act or any

14 other provision of law until the Secretary of Defense cer15 tifies in writing to Congress that, after the transfer—

16 (1) the amphibious lift capacity remaining

17 available in the Navy is sufficient in all lift categories to transport 21 18 ⁄2 Marine Corps expeditionary

19 brigades simultaneously; and

20 (2) the amphibious lift capacity planned to be

21 available in the Navy under the future-years defense

22 program will be sufficient in all lift categories,

23 throughout the period covered by the future-years de-
3

HR 4429 EAS

fense program, to transport 21 1 ⁄2 Marine Corps expedi2 tionary brigades simultaneously.

3 SEC. 7. USE OF PROCEEDS.

4 The proceeds derived from a transfer authorized by this

5 Act that are received in a fiscal year shall be credited to

6 the appropriation for the Navy for such fiscal year for oper7 ation and maintenance and shall be available, for the same

8 period as the appropriation to which credited, for operation

9 and maintenance of amphibious vessels.

Attest:

Secretary.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 159]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 1270]]

Public Law 112-159
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 2810 East Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, Florida, as the ``Reverend Abe 
  Brown Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 10, 2012 -  [H.R. 3276]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REVEREND ABE BROWN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2810 East Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Reverend Abe Brown Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Reverend 
Abe Brown Post Office Building''.

    Approved August 10, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3276:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            June 26, 28, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Ralph Rubio and Ira Fils hereby certify that:

1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of Rubio's Restaurants, Inc.

2. The Form 10-Q report of Rubio's Restaurants, Inc. that this certification
accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

3. The information contained in the Form 10-Q report of Rubio's Restaurants,
Inc. that this certification accompanies fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rubio's
Restaurants, Inc.

Dated: August 14, 2002                  /s/ RALPH RUBIO
                                        Ralph Rubio
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ IRA FILS
                                        Ira Fils
                                        Chief Financial Officer
# Comments on: 20-1543: PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. GOOGLE LLC [OPINION], Precedential
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

19–011 2012

112th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 112–137 

AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR LOCALITY PAY 

INCREASES 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR LOCALITY PAY INCREASE PAYABLE 

TO CIVILIAN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES COVERED BY THE GENERAL 

SCHEDULE (GS) AND CERTAIN OTHER PAY SYSTEMS FOR 2013, 

PURSUANT TO 5 U.S.C. 5305(a)(3) 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2012.—Referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform and ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with HDOCE:\Seals\Congress.#13

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 21, 2012. 

Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: I am transmitting an alternative plan for 

pay increases for civilian Federal employees covered by the General 

Schedule and certain other pay systems for 2013. 

Title 5, United States Code, authorizes me to implement alternative pay plans for pay increases for civilian Federal employees 

covered by the General Schedule and certain other pay systems if, 

because of ‘‘national emergency or serious economic conditions affecting the general welfare,’’ I view the adjustments that would 

otherwise take effect as inappropriate. 

Civilian Federal employees have already made significant sacrifices as a result of a two-year pay freeze. As our country continues to recover from serious economic conditions affecting the 

general welfare, however, we must maintain efforts to keep our Nation on a sustainable fiscal course. This is an effort that continues 

to require tough choices and each of us to do our fair share. 

Accordingly, I have determined that it is appropriate to exercise 

my statutory alternative plan authority under 5 U.S.C. 5303(b) and 

5304a to set alternative 2013 across-the-board and locality pay adjustments. Specifically, I have determined that for 2013, across-theboard pay increases will be 0.5 percent, and the current locality 

pay percentages shown in Schedule 9 of Executive Order 13594 of 

December 19, 2011, will remain at their 2012 levels. This decision 

will not materially affect the Federal Government’s ability to attract and retain a well-qualified Federal workforce. 

Finally, with respect to the anticipated continuing resolution, 

Congress should maintain current pay rates during the period of 

the continuing resolution. Assuming such a continuing resolution is 

enacted, the adjustments described above would take effect after 

the continuing resolution expires. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
#### Monica MILLER, Appellant, v. WELLS DAIRY INC. doing business as Wells Blue Bunny, Appellee.

No. 03-2219.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 2004.

Decided March 18, 2004.

Michael J. Carroll, Babich *&*Goldman, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Richard H. Moeller, Berenstein *&*Moore, Sioux City, IA, for Defendant-Ap-pellee.

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Monica Miller suffers from a knee condition that impairs her ability to climb stairs, kneel, squat, or bend her knees. After Wells Blue Bunny terminated her employment as a full-time quality control laboratory technician, Miller brought a disability discrimination action against Wells. The district court * granted summary judgment to Wells concluding Miller had not generated genuine issues of material fact that would allow a jury to find she was actually disabled or perceived as disabled. *Miller v. Wells Dairy, Inc.,*252 F.Supp.2d 799, 806-11 (N.D.Iowa 2003). Miller ap*194peals arguing the district court committed error in deciding as a matter of law that she did not establish a prima facie case of actual or perceived disability. Having carefully reviewed the record and the applicable law, we conclude the district court properly analyzed Miller’s claims and appropriately granted summary judgment. Because we have nothing to add to the district court’s thorough analysis, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s published opinion. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

*

 The Honorable Mark Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
#### § 105-55.025 Mutual releases of the debtor and the Government.

In all appropriate instances, a compromise that is accepted by the General Services Administration may be implemented by means of a mutual release, in which the debtor is released from further non-tax liability on the compromised debt in consideration of payment in full of the compromise amount and the Government and its officials, past and present, are released and discharged from any and all claims and causes of action arising from the same transaction that the debtor may have. In the event a mutual release is not executed when a debt is compromised, unless prohibited by law, the debtor is still deemed to have waived any and all claims and causes of action against the Government and its officials related to the transaction giving rise to the compromised debt.