alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16260]



[[Page 39887]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Advisory Panel To Assess the Capabilities for 
Domestic Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass 
Destruction

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
next meeting of the Panel to Assess the Capabilities for Domestic 
Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction. 
Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act. (Pub. L. 92-463).

DATES: July 17 and 18, 2000.

ADDRESSES: RAND, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050.

PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND AGENDA: Panel to Assess the Capabilities for 
Domestic Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass 
Destruction will meet from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. on July 17, 2000, and 
from 9 a.m. until 2 p.m. on July 18, 2000. Time will be allocated for 
public comments by individuals or organizations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RAND provides information about this 
Panel on its web site at http://www.rand.org/organization/nsrd/terrpanel; it can also be reached at (703) 413-1100 extension 5282. 
Public comment presentations will be limited to two minutes each and 
must be provided in writing prior to the meeting. Mail written 
presentations and requests to register to attend the open public 
session to: Priscilla Schlegel, RAND, 1200 South Hayes Street, 
Arlington, VA 22202-5050. Public seating for this meeting is limited, 
and is available on a first-come first-served basis.

    Dated: June 22, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-16260 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5601-10-M
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"23-1249: DALI WIRELESS INC. v. CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6zbI3waRxT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-27-2023-23-1249-dali-wireless-inc-v-corning-optical-communications-llc-order-23-1249-order-3-27-2023_2100690\/\">23-1249: DALI WIRELESS INC. v. CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-27-2023-23-1249-dali-wireless-inc-v-corning-optical-communications-llc-order-23-1249-order-3-27-2023_2100690\/embed\/#?secret=6zbI3waRxT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“23-1249: DALI WIRELESS INC. v. CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"6zbI3waRxT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: DALI WIRELESS INC. v. CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 23-1249 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
#### § 0.501 General.

Executive Order 12356 requires that information relating to national security be protected against unauthorized disclosure as long as required by national security considerations. The Order also provides that all information classified under Executive Order 12356 or predecessor orders be subject to a review for declassification upon receipt of a request made by a United States citizen or permanent resident alien, a Federal agency, or a state or local government.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1414 Review period for pole attachment complaints. ( a ) *Pole access complaints.* Except in extraordinary circumstances, final action on a complaint where a cable television system operator or provider of telecommunications service claims that it has been denied access to a pole, duct, conduit, or right-of-way owned or controlled by a utility should be expected no later than 180 days from the date the complaint is filed with the Commission. The Enforcement Bureau shall have the discretion to pause the 180-day review period in situations where actions outside the Enforcement Bureau's control are responsible for delaying review of a pole access complaint.
( b ) *Other pole attachment complaints.* All other pole attachment complaints shall be governed by the review period in § 1.740.
[83 FR 44842, Sept. 4, 2018]
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT NO. 11

                         ANALYSTS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

                        COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                          Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended
(In thousands except                         December 31         December 31
per share amounts)                        ------------------  ----------------
                                             1997      1996      1997     1996
                                             ----      ----      ----     ----
<S>                                         <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>
Basic:

Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding                           22,353   22,014    22,332   21,996
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------

Net income                                  $ 5,031  $ 3,905   $10,411  $ 7,773
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------

Per share amount                            $   .23  $   .17   $   .47  $   .35
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------

DILUTED:

Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding                           22,353   22,014    22,332  21,996

Dilutive stock options after application of
treasury stock method.                          544      546       496      456
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------

Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding         22,897   22,560    22,828   22,452
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------

Net income                                  $ 5,031  $ 3,905   $10,411   $ 7,773
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------

Per share amount                            $   .22  $   .17   $   .46  $   .34
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------
                                            -------  -------   -------  -------


</TABLE>
No. 11-1132.

#### Millman et al. v. Inglish et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-1092.

#### McCrary *v.*Ivanof Bay Village et al.

Sup. Ct. Alaska. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2137

MICHAEL ADEMOLA ADEPOJU, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: June 17, 2009 Decided: June 30, 2009

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, Aimee J. Frederickson, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Ademola Adepoju, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for adjustment of status and voluntary departure. We have reviewed the record and find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Adepoju is ineligible for adjustment of status and voluntary departure. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Adepoju (B.I.A. Sept. 10, 2008). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED

* We specifically uphold the finding that the order imposing probation without any adjudication of guilt constituted a conviction for immigration purposes. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(48)(A) (2006); Yanez-Popp v. INS , 998 F.2d 231 (4th Cir. 1993).
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4353

To require businesses who compile consumer lists for sale to other businesses

to notify consumers on the list of the sales of the list.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1994

Mr. GALLO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To require businesses who compile consumer lists for sale

to other businesses to notify consumers on the list of

the sales of the list.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Information

5 Privacy Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONSUMER LISTS.

7 Any person engaged in business in commerce who

8 compiles a list of the persons to whom such person make

9 sales or with whom such person otherwise does business

10 which consists of their names, addresses, telephone num-
2

•HR 4353 IH

1 bers, and other personal information for the purpose of

2 selling such list shall notify the persons included in the

3 list of the potential sale of the list. A notified person may

4 require the person selling a list to delete such information

5 respecting the notified person as such person specifies.

6 SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT.

7 Compliance with the requirements of section 2 shall

8 be enforced under the Federal Trade Commission Act by

9 the Federal Trade Commission. A violation of any require10 ment under section 2 shall constitute an unfair or decep11 tive act or practice in commerce in violation of section 5(a)

12 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and shall be subject

13 to enforcement under section 5(b) of such Act irrespective

14 of whether the person who committed such violation is en15 gaged in commerce or meets any other jurisdictional test

16 in such Act. The Federal Trade Commission shall have

17 such procedural, investigative, and enforcement powers in

18 enforcing compliance with the requirements of section 2

19 and may require the filing of reports, the production of

20 documents, and the appearance of witnesses as though the

21 applicable terms of such Act were part of this section.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4336 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4336

                   For the relief of Mary J. Woodard.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 1994

   Mr. Rose introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Mary J. Woodard.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, for the purposes 
of applying subchapter III of chapter 83 of title 5, United States 
Code, with respect to Mary J. Woodard of Fayetteville, North Carolina, 
service performed by Mary J. Woodard as an employee of the Central Post 
fund at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, shall be deemed to be service 
creditable under paragraph (16) of section 8332(b) of such title.

                                 <all>
```
No. 11-9362.

#### Pulliam *v.*Uribe, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.89 Notice of violations. ( a ) Except in cases of willfulness or those in which public health, interest, or safety requires otherwise, any person who holds a license, permit or other authorization appearing to have violated any provision of the Communications Act or any provision of this chapter will, before revocation, suspension, or cease and desist proceedings are instituted, be served with a written notice calling these facts to his or her attention and requesting a statement concerning the matter. FCC Form 793 may be used for this purpose. The Notice of Violation may be combined with a Notice of Apparent Liability to Monetary Forfeiture. In such event, notwithstanding the Notice of Violation, the provisions of § 1.80 apply and not those of § 1.89.
( b ) Within 10 days from receipt of notice or such other period as may be specified, the recipient shall send a written answer, in duplicate, directly to the Commission office originating the official notice. If an answer cannot be sent or an acknowledgment cannot be made within such 10-day period by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance, acknowledgment and answer shall be made at the earliest practicable date with a satisfactory explanation of the delay.
( c ) The answer to each notice shall be complete in itself and shall not be abbreviated by reference to other communications or answers to other notices. In every instance the answer shall contain a statement of action taken to correct the condition or omission complained of and to preclude its recurrence. In addition: ( 1 ) If the notice relates to violations that may be due to the physical or electrical characteristics of transmitting apparatus and any new apparatus is to be installed, the answer shall state the date such apparatus was ordered, the name of the manufacturer, and the promised date of delivery. If the installation of such apparatus requires a construction permit, the file number of the application shall be given, or if a file number has not been assigned by the Commission, such identification shall be given as will permit ready identification of the application.
( 2 ) If the notice of violation relates to lack of attention to or improper operation of the transmitter, the name and license number of the operator in charge (where applicable) shall be given.
[48 FR 24890, June 3, 1983]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-40390

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DEANDRE BENNETT,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:16-CR-76-1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Deandre Bennett

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bennett has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently 

developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Bennett’s claims of 

ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider those claims

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 27, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-40390 Document: 00515286381 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/27/2020
No. 19-40390

2

without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 

841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief, the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, and Bennett’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Bennett’s motion to appoint new counsel is DENIED. See

United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902–03 (5th Cir. 1998).

 Case: 19-40390 Document: 00515286381 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/27/2020
#### § 105-64.301 Under what conditions will I be denied access to a record?

The system manager will deny access to a record that is being compiled in the reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding or to records that are specifically exempted from disclosure by GSA in its system of records notices, published in the Federal Register. Exempted systems include the Investigation Case Files, Internal Evaluation Case Files, and Security Files. These systems are exempted to maintain the effectiveness and integrity of investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General, and others, as part of their duties and responsibilities involving Federal employment, contracts, and security.
UnionGasLimited-NaturalGasComposition0unongasoavt*es...IIiI1IIChemicalCompositionofNaturalGasNaturalgasisanaturallyoccurringgasmixture,consistingmainlyofmethane.WhilemostofthegassuppliedtoUnionGasisfromwesternCanada,somegasissuppliedfromothersources,includingtheUnitedStatesandOntarioproducers.Whilethegasfromthesesourceshasasimilaranalysis,itisnotentirelythesame.ThetablebelowoutlinesthetypicalcomponentsofnaturalgasontheUnionGassystemandthetypicalrangesforthesevalues(allowingforthedifferentsources).Notethatthereisnoguaranteeofthefollowingcompositionatyourlocationorasanoverallsystemaverage.SincethedifferentgassuppliesentertheUnionGassystematdifferentlocations,theexactcompositionatanysitewillvaryamongthedifferentregions.Thesystemaverageheatingvaluewilldependonthemixofgassupplies(whichisincreasinglycontrolledbyourcustomers),andthereforecanvaryfromthetypicalvaluelistedbelow.ComponentTypicalAnalysisRange(mole%)(mole%)Methane95.287.0-96.0Ethane2.51.5-5.1Propane0.20.1-1.5iso-Butane0.030.01-0.3normal-Butane0.030.01-0.3iso-Pentane0.01trace-0.14normal-Pentane0.01trace-0.04Hexanesplus0.01trace-0.06*Thej9atingvalueisthetotalheatobtaineycompleteombustijiatSostantpressureofaunitvolumeofgasinair,includingtheheatreleasedbycondensingthewaterUnionGasLimited-NaturalGasCompositionvapourinthecombustionproducts(gas,air,andcombustionproductstakenatstandardtemperatureandpressure).Sulphur:IntheUnionGassystem,thetypicalsulphurcontentis5.5mg/rn3.Thisincludesthe4.9mg/rn3ofsulphurintheodourant(rnercaptan)addedtogasforsafetyreasons.Water:ThewatervapourcontentofnaturalgasintheUnionGassystemislessthan80mg/rn3,andistypically16to32mg/rn3.TypicalCombustionPropertiesofNaturalGasNotethatthereisnoguaranteethatthecombustionpropertiesatyourlocationwillbeexactlyasshown.ThepropertiesshownareanoverallaverageontheUnionGassystem.IgnitionPoint:593°C*FlammabilityLimits4%-l6%(volume%inair)*TheoreticalFlameTemperature(stoichiometricair/fuel1960°C(3562°F)ratio)MaximumFlameVelocity0.3rn/sRelativedensity(specificgravity)0.58WobbeIndex(Btu/scf)1328*tInformationprovidedisfromNorthAmericanCombustionHandbook,Volume,3rdedition,NorthAmericanMfgCo.,1986.*InformationprovidedisfromtheChemicalCompositionofNaturalGasasshownonthechartabove.*InformationprovidedisfromtheUnionGasMaterialSafetyDataSheet(WHMIS).2of2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          33,941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                       725
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,094
<PP&E>                                          34,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,285
<BONDS>                                         27,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,253
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,338
<SALES>                                        311,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               311,450
<CGS>                                          244,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,476
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,329
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,087
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,087
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>