alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,050
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,374
<PP&E>                                          59,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                (47,334)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           279
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,880)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,832
<SALES>                                            942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   985
<CGS>                                            1,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    82
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (757)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (757)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**MOSSIMO, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Mossimo, Inc. (theCompany) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I Edwin Lewis, Vice-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the Company.
| /s/ EDWIN LEWIS                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Edwin Lewis*Vice Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer*  March 31, 2006 |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINALOF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THECOMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF UPONREQUEST.

THIS CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-K TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILEDWITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE INTO A FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THESECURITIES ACT OF 1934 (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-K),IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING.

----
No. 11M105.

#### Conyers *v.*Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security Authority.

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 437

To provide for research on antiprogestin drugs through the National Institutes

of Health.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. WAXMAN, Mrs. SCHROEDER, and Mr. DEFAZIO)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To provide for research on antiprogestin drugs through the

National Institutes of Health.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Antiprogestin Testing

5 Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. RESEARCH.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and

8 Human Services, acting through the Director of the Na9 tional Institutes of Health, may conduct and support re10 search (including clinical trials) on antiprogestin drugs for
2

•HR 437 IH

1 their safety and efficacy for any potential use, including

2 termination of pregnancy and contraception, and when

3 used therapeutically for cancer, endocrine disorders, and

4 endometriosis.

5 (b) INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS AND PEER RE6 VIEW.—Research conducted or supported under sub7 section (a) shall be subject to sections 491 and 492 of

8 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 289, 289a).

9 (c) PRIORITIES.—In determining priorities for re10 search under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider

11 data from previous research.

12 SEC. 3. REPORT.

13 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall

14 report to Congress the results of research conducted or

15 supported under section 2(a) on January 1, 1994, and

16 annually thereafter.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4405 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4405

To require a 25-percent reduction in appropriations for the legislative 
                       branch of the Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1994

Mr. Goodlatte introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require a 25-percent reduction in appropriations for the legislative 
                       branch of the Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF 25 PERCENT IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE 
              LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT.

    Notwithstanding any other law, or any rule or other authority, the 
total of appropriations for the legislative branch of the Government 
for fiscal year 1995 may not exceed 75 percent of the total of 
appropriations for the legislative branch of the Government for fiscal 
year 1994.

                                 <all>
```
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Application to Amend Foreign Air Carrier Permit
#### § 0.502 Purpose.

This subpart prescribes the procedures to be followed in submitting requests, processing such requests, appeals taken from denials of declassification requests and fees and charges.
# Comments on: 21-2275: PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. APPLE INC. [OPINION], Precedential
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

TRILLER, INC., 

Appellant

v.

BYTEDANCE LTD., TIKTOK INC., 

Appellees

______________________

2022-1937

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-

00099.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 22-1937 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 09/30/2022
2 TRILLER, INC. V. BYTEDANCE LTD.

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

September 30, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 30, 2022

Case: 22-1937 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 09/30/2022
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of VendingData Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A forthe year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Steven J. Blad, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of the Company, and John R. Spina, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    |   /s/ Steven  J. Blad                                               |   | Dated: | April 28,  2004 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------|
|   |   Steven J.  Blad                                                   |   |   |
| Title: |   Chief  Executive Officer and President of VendingData Corporation |
|   |                                                                          |   |   |
|   |                                                                          |   |   |
| By:    |   /s/ John R. Spina                                                 |   | Dated: | April 28,  2004 |
|   |   John  R. Spina                                                    |   |   |
| Title: |   Chief  Financial Officer of VendingData Corporation               |

 

 

This certification ismade solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to theknowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.733 Status conference. ( a ) In any complaint proceeding, the Commission may, in its discretion, direct the attorneys and/or the parties to appear before it for a status conference. A status conference may include discussion of: ( 1 ) Simplification or narrowing of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity for or desirability of additional pleadings or evidentiary submissions;
( 3 ) Obtaining admissions of fact or stipulations between the parties as to any or all of the matters in controversy;
( 4 ) Settlement of all or some of the matters in controversy by agreement of the parties;
( 5 ) Whether discovery is necessary and, if so, the scope, type, and schedule for such discovery;
( 6 ) The schedule for the remainder of the case and the dates for any further status conferences; and
( 7 ) Such other matters that may aid in the disposition of the complaint.
( b ) ( 1 ) Parties shall meet and confer prior to the initial status conference to discuss: ( i ) Settlement prospects;
( ii ) Discovery;
( iii ) Issues in dispute;
( iv ) Schedules for pleadings;
( v ) Joint statement of stipulated facts, disputed facts, and key legal issues; and
( 2 ) Parties shall submit a joint statement of all proposals agreed to and disputes remaining as a result of such meeting to Commission staff on a date specified by the Commission.
( c ) In addition to the initial status conference referenced in paragraph (a) of this section, any party may also request that a conference be held at any time after the complaint has been filed.
( d ) During a status conference, the Commission staff may issue oral rulings pertaining to a variety of matters relevant to the conduct of a formal complaint proceeding including, *inter alia,* procedural matters, discovery, and the submission of briefs or other evidentiary materials.
( e ) Status conferences will be scheduled by the Commission staff at such time and place as it may designate to be conducted in person or by telephone conference call.
( f ) The failure of any attorney or party, following reasonable notice, to appear at a scheduled conference will be deemed a waiver by that party and will not preclude the Commission staff from conferring with those parties or counsel present.
[83 FR 44832, Sept. 4, 2018]
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period June 30, 2007
(the "Report"), Joey Schwartz Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1). To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                           DATE: AUGUST 10, 2007


                                           /S/ JOEY SCHWARTZ
                                           --------------------
                                           JOEY SCHWARTZ
                                           CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1 

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 

 

The Board of Directors 

Cotelligent, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-31914,333-33312, 333-67589, 333-3388 and 333-103978) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-53899 and 333-111550) on Form S-4 of Cotelligent, Inc., of our report dated April 8, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofCotelligent, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Cotelligent, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, California

April 14, 2004
§ 17.47 Inspection of antenna structure lights and associated control equipment. The owner of any antenna structure which is registered with the Commission and has been assigned lighting specifications referenced in this part: ( a ) ( 1 ) Shall make an observation of the antenna structure's lights at least once each 24 hours either visually or by observing an automatic properly maintained indicator designed to register any failure of such lights, to insure that all such lights are functioning properly as required; or alternatively,
( 2 ) Shall provide and properly maintain an automatic alarm system designed to detect any failure of such lights and to provide indication of such failure to the owner.
( b ) Shall inspect at intervals not to exceed 3 months all automatic or mechanical control devices, indicators, and alarm systems associated with the antenna structure lighting to insure that such apparatus is functioning properly.
( c ) Is exempt from paragraph (b) of this section for any antenna structure monitored by a system that the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau has determined includes self-diagnostic features sufficient to render quarterly inspections unnecessary, upon certification of use of such system to the Bureau.
[61 FR 4363, Feb. 6, 1996, as amended at 79 FR 56986, Sept. 24, 2014]
EXHIBIT 10.1


Date              November 12, 2002

To                Edward P. Smoot

cc                David Orr, Chairman of the Compensation Committee

Subject           Part-Time Employment Agreement



     As approved by the  Compensation  Committee of the Board of Directors,  you
will be a part-time  employee of Anacomp,  Inc.  for fiscal year 2003.  You have
agreed to work ten (10)  hours per pay  period  and be paid  $1923.06  bi-weekly
($50,000.00  per  year).  You will  work on  special  projects  assigned  by the
President and Chief Executive Officer,  including matters such as:  acquisitions
and  divestures,  banking  and  investor  issues.  In the event that you work in
excess of ten (10)  hours in a pay  period,  you will be paid at an hourly  rate
commensurate  with your  bi-weekly  pay.  You will not be eligible  for vacation
accrual,  holiday pay or any other employee benefits. You will be subject to all
policies contained in Anacomp's Employee Handbook.

     This letter  agreement  may only be modified  by mutual  written  agreement
between the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and yourself.  This
letter  agreement  shall be  governed  by the laws of the  State of  California,
without regard to its conflict of laws.

     Please sign below to indicate your  acceptance of the terms and  conditions
of this letter agreement. Best regards,


                                        /s/ Jeffrey R. Cramer
                                        ___________________________
                                        Jeffrey R. Cramer
                                        President and CEO

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:


/s/ Edward P. Smoot
_______________________                 ___________________________
Edward P. Smoot                         Date
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-1387: APPLE INC. v. MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zmGRSytRR6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-25-2022-21-1387-apple-inc-v-mph-technologies-oy-opinion-21-1387-opinion-1-25-2022_1897789\/\">21-1387: APPLE INC. v. MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-25-2022-21-1387-apple-inc-v-mph-technologies-oy-opinion-21-1387-opinion-1-25-2022_1897789\/embed\/#?secret=zmGRSytRR6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-1387: APPLE INC. v. MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"zmGRSytRR6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: APPLE INC. v. MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-1387 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1995, AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      24,726,216
<SECURITIES>                                25,353,693
<RECEIVABLES>                                  964,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,046
<INVENTORY>                                  1,548,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,687,020
<PP&E>                                       3,944,396
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,452,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,290,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,609,636
<BONDS>                                        215,753
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,635
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,453,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,290,455
<SALES>                                        956,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               956,803
<CGS>                                          594,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  594,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             122,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,006,888)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,006,888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,006,888)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>