alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
%KK*K%$"/K$K%($K-*K;K;K&&;K;K32;1

United States Court of Appeals 

%(K*K,$*K(+*

%<K""$%)K60604

+#**K	+"/K20<K2018G

K	+"/K30<K2018K

%(



K; 
<


K K; 
<


K K	; ; <



%;K17H2567K


KKK<K

<K

K K ;K


K
<K

;K

&&"K (%#K *K $*K

**)K )*(*K %+(*K %(K *K


%(*($K )*(*K %K ""$%)<K

)*($K,)%$;K


%;K16KK2H1K

(")K;K
%("<K;K




%$"K%-$K&"K+"*/K*%K*($)&%(*$K"K&%($%(&/<K18K;;;K

F2252>?>1?<K$K-)K)$*$K*%K15K/()CK#&()%$#$*;KK"$*K%K*K)$*$K

&$)K%$K$K$$#$*K+$(K18K;;;KF2252>?>1?<K-K&&")K*%K$/K&()%$K

-%K)KK%$,*%$KD+$(K*K"-)K%K$/K**K("*$K*%K(,*K).+"K+)<K

).+"K+)<K%(K+),K).+"K%$+*K$,%",$KK#$%(K%(K-(<K%(K*K&(%+*%$<K

KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

GK*(K.#$$K *K()K$K *K(%(<K-K,K%$"+K **K%("K (+#$*K)K+$$))(/;K

K;K;K&&;K;K34>?>2?>?;K

%;K17H2567K K2K

&%))))%$<K(&*<K#"$<K)"<K)*(+*%$<K)&#$*<K%(K*($)&%(**%$K%K"K&%(H

$%(&/<K%(K).K*(!$K%K"($E;K+)*%$K>?>1?K&(%,)K%(KK#$#+#K

*(#K%K15K/()K$KK#.#+#K%K40=K-*%+*K*K$$#$*K*K)**+*%(/K($K%(K

%-$K-%+"K,K$K5K*%K20K/();KK*(#K%K15K/()K)K-*$K%*K($)<K+*K/K

$$K*K$$#$*K&&""K*K)*(*K%+(*K$K*)K)(*%$;K>K +K

K$%*K)/K+$'+,%""/K**KK-%+"K,K#&%)KK15H/(K)$*$K-*%+*K("/H

$K%$K*K$$#$*K+$(K)+)*%$K>?>1?;?K

K)*(*K%+(*K%+$K**K$K1982K%-$KK$K%$,*K%K,%"*$K38K"";K

,;K**;KF11H5>?>3?K>1981?<K-K&(%*)K"-K*%+$K%KK";K-K*%+$K

*-$K#$%()K)K$%*K$%+K*%K""K%(K$K$$#$*K+$(K)+)*%$K>?>1?=K*K

).+"K%$+*K#+)*KKD+),EK>%(K"K-*K"K&%($%(&/K%(K).K*(!$K%K

"($?;KK)*(*K +K%$"+K**K*K$$#$*K$%$*"))K&&")<KH

+)K*K%$+*K**K"K*%K*K1982K%$,*%$K-)
K+),;K$K($K*)K

%$"+)%$K*K +K("K%$K&%"K(%()K(*(K*$K*K)**K)**+*<K*K($K

&&()<K%(K*K*(#)K%K*K)**K%+(*C)K +#$*;K$K("/$K%$K(()*K(%()K*K +K

*%%!K%+$*K%K%+#$*)K**K*K+&(#K%+(*K"K)%+"K$%*KK%$)(;K

	<K544K;;K13<K21I23K>2005?;K%(%,(<K*K%+(*K'+*KD"-E

%$+*K-*KD+),EK%$+*K)&*KK)%$K%K*)K%+(*K( *$K**K'+*%$K

%(KK#*(""/K$*"K)**+*K$K$$;KK	<K551K;3K718K

>7*K(;K2009?;K

$%(*+$*"/<K$%K%$K""KK*%K*K)*(*K +C)K**$*%$<K$K*K +K

")%KK$%*K#&"#$*K*K()*(*%$K#&%)K/K;K$K*)K%+(*<K%-,(<K*K

&(%)+*%(K)K%$))K((%(;K+)K*K)**K%$,*%$K%+"K()*K%$K$%$H+),K

%$+*<K$K("K"-K#!)K*K&(%&(*/K%K(,)*K$$#$*)K&$K%$K*K

(#K%K%$,*%$K(*(K*$K-*K*K$$*K*+""/K<K)K	

<K136K;K*;K2243K>2016?<K-K&*K*K%$))%$K$K(#$K%(K()$*$$;K

"*%+K*K%+(*K#+)*K$%*K$$K*K)$*$K+$(K)+)*%$K>?>1?<K*K(H

#$)K(K*%K%$)(K%-$C)K*+"K%$+*K-$K.()$K*)K)(*%$K*%K(*KK

)$*$<K-*$K*K($K%K5K*%K20K/()<K%(K*K%$+*K%K-K%-$K)*$)K%$H

,*;KK +K)K&(#**J$K('+(J*%K%$)(K*KD)*%(/K$K(*(H

)*)EK%K*K$$*;K18K;;;KF3553>?>1?;KK	
<K576K;3K400<K

403K:K$;2K>7*K(;K2009?;KD
%K"#**%$K)""KK&"K%$K*K$%(#*%$K%$($$K

*K!(%+$<K(*(<K$K%$+*K%KK&()%$K%$,*K%K$K%$)K-KK

%+(*K%K*K$*K**)K#/K(,K$K%$)(K%(K*K&+(&%)K%K#&%)$K$K&H

&(%&(*K)$*$;EK18K;;;KF3661;K

%;K17H2567K K3K

K*(+)*K**K-$K$*($KK$-K)$*$K*K)*(*K%+(*K-""K%((*K*K +H

#$*K*%K("*K**K%-$K)K$K%$,*K%K,%"*$K18K;;;KF2252>?>1?K$K

$%*<K)K*K +#$*K$%-K()<K18K;;;KF2252>1?>1?K@)AK$K>?>1?;K

K
K
No. 11-8784.

#### Hollis *v.*United States,

565 U. S. 1276. Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"18-1585: HICKEY v. DHS [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jEKGNtUnLC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/3-22-2019-18-1585-hickey-v-dhs-opinion-nonprecedential-18-1585-opinion-3-22-2019\/\">18-1585: HICKEY v. DHS [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/3-22-2019-18-1585-hickey-v-dhs-opinion-nonprecedential-18-1585-opinion-3-22-2019\/embed\/#?secret=jEKGNtUnLC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“18-1585: HICKEY v. DHS [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"jEKGNtUnLC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: HICKEY v. DHS [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 18-1585 Origin: MSPB Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James R. Lavelle, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge, Cotelligent, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Cotelligent, Inc.

Date: November 24, 2003

By: /s/ James R. Lavelle
    ---------------------------------------------------
    James R. Lavelle
    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-9699.

#### Neder *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th. Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000006814
<NAME>                        COMFORCE Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS            
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         4,943
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 85,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                     591
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              95,918
<PP&E>                                        10,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               250,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         40,820
<BONDS>                                      131,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        1
<COMMON>                                         158
<OTHER-SE>                                    45,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 250,946
<SALES>                                      347,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             347,347
<CGS>                                        282,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                325,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (34)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            16,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,242
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,871
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              371
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     371
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .02
                                                

</TABLE>
No. 11-9688.

#### Crane-Horton *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# AGENCY:

 Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

 Establishment of a Supplementary Rule establishing guidelines for the operation of off-road vehicles within developed recreational sites on public lands administered by the BLM Butte Field Office in the state of Montana. 

# SUMMARY:

 Off-road vehicle use in developed recreation sites has resulted in conflicts between vehicle operators and other public land site visitors. Safety hazards occur with unlimited vehicle use in congested, developed recreation sites. Vehicle operation off roadways in developed campgrounds and picnic areas has caused considerable damage to natural resources and public property resulting in increased operational and maintenance costs. The developed recreation sites listed below shall be closed to the use and operation of off-road vehicles from April 15 thru October 15. Off-road vehicle operation outside these dates shall be limited to existing roads, parking lots and campsite pull-ins. Sites administered by the Butte Field Office affected by this restriction notice include: 

Yellowstone River—Carbella. 

Big Hole River—East Bank, Dickie Bridge, Bryant Creek, Jerry Creek, Upper and Lower Divide. 

Missouri River—Upper and Lower Toston, Devils Elbow, Holter Dam, Holter Lake, Log Gulch and Departure Point. 

This Supplementary Rule is issued under authority of 43 CFR 8365.1-6. 

Penalties: As prescribed under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, 43 USC Section 1733(a). Violation is punishable by fines and/or imprisonment under 43 CFR 8360.0-7.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

                         To comply with the Administrative Procedures Act, this Supplementary Rule will go into effect 30 days after publication in the                         **Federal Register**                         if no substantive negative comments are received and will remain in effect until rescinded or modified by the authorized officer.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Steve Hartmann, Acting Field Manager, P.O. Box 3388, Butte, Montana 59702, 406-494-5059. 

Dated: January 12, 2000. 

Steve Hartmann, 

Acting Field Manager. 

[FR Doc. 00-1673 Filed 1-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.358 Tariffs as evidence.

In case any matter contained in a tariff schedule on file with the Commission is offered in evidence, such tariff schedule need not be produced or marked for identification, but the matter so offered shall be specified with particularity (tariff and page number) in such manner as to be readily identified, and may be received in evidence by reference subject to check with the original tariff schedules on file.
No. 11-5084.

#### Rios *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Final as Approved

Corporation for National and Community Service

Board of Directors

Resolution

WHEREAS, Romonia “Mona” Dixon served with dedication, enthusiasm, and distinction as a Member 

of the Board of Directors for the Corporation for National and Community Service since July 2015; and

WHEREAS, Mona Dixon has provided exemplary service as the youth appointee to the Board, 

representing the perspectives of young people who serve in and are served by the agency’s programs, and 

empowering other youth to become involved in service in their communities; and

WHEREAS, Mona Dixon’s personal story of overcoming barriers – including experiencing 

homelessness – through hard work, determination, and the kindness of others is highly inspirational and 

empowering; and 

WHEREAS, Mona Dixon was awarded the coveted Boys and Girls Club of America “National Youth of 

the Year Award” in 2010 for her exemplary academics, leadership, and community service; and 

 

WHEREAS, Mona Dixon founded the Inspired by Mona Foundation in 2018 to provide teens with 

opportunities, resources, and real-life skills to be successful through her Teen Success Academy; and

WHEREAS, Mona Dixon was, from an early age, committed to service as a way for Americans to get 

things done, help one another, and be the solution in their own communities; and

WHEREAS, Mona Dixon has helped the Corporation for National and Community Service advance its 

critical mission by participating in the Martin Luther King Jr. National Day of Service, National Service 

Recognition Day, the Arizona Governor's Youth Commission Youth Leadership Day, and other service 

projects and events; and 

WHEREAS, Mona Dixon has been a unique and powerful voice for the value and impact of national 

service and the mission of the Corporation for National and Community Service; therefore

BE IT RESOLVED, this 12th day of August, 2019, that the Board of Directors for the Corporation for 

National and Community Service, with great respect and affection, recognizes the outstanding 

contributions of Mona Dixon as a Member of the Board of Directors.

Shamina Singh

Chair

Resolution 2019-02
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4205

AN ACT

To amend title 11, D.C. Code, to clarify that blind individuals are eligible to serve as jurors in the Superior Court

of the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF BLIND IN4 DIVIDUALS TO SERVE AS JURORS IN DIS5 TRICT OF COLUMBIA.

6 Section 11–1906(b), D.C. Code, is amended by add7 ing at the end the following new paragraph:

8 ‘‘(4) An individual who is blind may not be disquali9 fied from serving as a juror solely on the basis of blind10 ness, but may be disqualified from serving as a juror in

11 a particular case if the individual’s blindness makes the
2

HR 4205 EH

1 individual incapable of rendering satisfactory jury service

2 in that case.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4205

AN ACT

To amend title 11, D.C. Code, to clarify that blind

Superior Court of the District of Columbia.individuals are eligible to serve as jurors in the
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.13

December 31, 2003

James R. Lavellle
[Home address]

Re: Special Bonus
    -------------

Dear Jim:

This letter will confirm our agreement concerning the payment to you of a
special bonus for your efforts related to the Company's acquisition of On-Site
Media, Inc. ("On-Site").

In connection with the signing of a definitive agreement relating to the
acquisition of On-Site on November 25, 2003 (the "Merger Agreement"), you will
be paid a bonus equal to $354,817, plus a tax-gross up payment equal to
$243,702. Immediately following the closing of the transactions contemplated by
the Merger Agreement, you will be paid an additional bonus of $364,527, plus a
tax-gross up payment of $275,069, in each case subject to applicable withholding
taxes. You will not be entitled to the payments referred to in the preceding
sentence if (i) the closing does not occur for any reason, or (ii) prior to the
closing, your employment with the Company terminates for any reason, other than
a termination "without cause" as defined in Section 5(d) of the Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement between you and the Company dated January 5, 2000
(the "Employment Agreement").

You agree and acknowledge that neither the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the issuance of Company shares
and warrants pursuant thereto, nor the subsequent conversion of such warrants
into shares, will result in a "Change in Control" as that term is defined in the
Employment Agreement, and that the provisions of Section 12 of the Employment
Agreement (including, without limitation subsections (b), (c) and (g) thereof)
do not and will not apply in connection with the acquisition and related events.

Sincerely,


Cotelligent, Inc.


By: /s/ Curtis Parker
   ----------------------------------

ACCEPTED AND AGREED

/s/ James R. Lavelle
-------------------------------------
James R. Lavelle
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131048 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131048 

 COA: 263603 
 Wayne CC: 87-002107

DWIGHT ANDREWS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0821 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 29, 2006 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Nustate Energy Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kathleen A. Roberton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



July 25, 2016



|By: | /s/
    Kathleen A. Roberton         | 
|--- | ------------------------------------ | 
|    | Kathleen
    A. Roberton             | 
|    | CEO,
    principal executive officer | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN REPLY REFER TO: 

9015 (OR932) 

July 30,2010 

Dear Reader: 

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 

Oregon State Office 

P.O. Box 2965 

Portland, Oregon 97208 

Thank you for your interest in the management of public lands in Oregon. Enclosed is the Final 

Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) for Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on BLM 

Lands in Oregon. The Proposed Action, Alternative 4, would allow for the use of 16 herbicides 

east of the Cascades and 13 herbicides west of the Cascades to treat noxious and invasive plants; 

treat any vegetation needed to control pests and diseases in State-identified control areas; treat any 

vegetation to meet safety and operation objectives in administrative sites, recreation sites, and 

rights-of-way; and treat any vegetation to achieve habitat goals specified in approved Recovery 

Plans or other plans specifically identified as part of recovery or deli sting plans, Conservation 

Strategies, or Conservation Agreements for Federally Listed, proposed for listing, or Bureau 

Sensitive species. 

The Draft EIS for Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on BLM Lands in Oregon was released 

for public comment in October 2009. Approximately 1,050 comments were received on the Draft 

EIS, and the ideas presented in these comments were used to improve the analysis presented in the 

Final EIS. 

The Notice of Availability for this Final EIS is expected to be published in the Federal Register on 

or about July 30, 2010. A Record of Decision is expected to be signed 30 to 90 days after 

publication of the Notice of Availability of the Final EIS. A separate Notice of Availability for the 

Record of Decision will also be published in the Federal Register and its publication date will 

begin a 30-day appeal period. The appeal process will be described in the Notice of Availability 

for the Record of Decision and in the Record of Decision itself. 

For further information, or to receive a printed copy of this EIS, please visit the project website at 

~~~.!...!2..~~~~~~~~~~~~~?!...' email or write to the 

Vegetation Treatments EIS Team at Vegetation Treatments EIS Team, P.O. Box 2965, Portland, 

Oregon 97208-2965. 

Enclosure 

Edward W. Shepard 

State Director, 

Oregon/Washington 

i
�