alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 5, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16870]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-1328; MM Docket No. 99-350; RM-9769]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Simmesport, LA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 287A to Simmesport, Louisiana, as 
that community's first local aural transmission service, in response to 
a petition for rule making filed on behalf of C. Wayne Dowdy. See 64 FR 
73463, December 30, 1999. Coordinates used for Channel 287A at 
Simmesport, Louisiana, are 30-53-30 NL and 91-47-00 WL.

DATES: Effective July 31, 2000. A filing window for Channel 287A at 
Simmesport, Louisiana, will not be opened at this time. Instead, the 
issue of opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by 
the Commission in a subsequent Order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180. Questions related to the application filing process for 
Channel 287A at Simmesport, Louisiana, should be addressed to the Audio 
Services Division, (202) 418-2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-350, adopted June 7, 2000, and 
released June 16, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth Street, SW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Louisiana, 
is amended by adding Simmesport, Channel 287A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
 Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-16870 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
```

[House Report 106-49]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
1st Session             HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                 106-49
_______________________________________________________________________

 
   PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 819, THE FEDERAL MARITIME 
                  COMMISSION AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 1999

                                _______
                                

   March 10, 1999.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

    Mr. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 104]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 104, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               brief summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 819, 
the ``Federal Maritime Commission Authorization Act of 1999'' 
under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general 
debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure. The rule provides that the bill be considered 
as read.
    Members who have preprinted their amendments in the 
Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given 
priority in recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise 
consistent with House rules. The rule allows for the Chairman 
of the Committee of the Whole to postpone votes during 
consideration of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five 
minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows a fifteen 
minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to 
recommit, with or without instructions.

                                

```
## NUMBER 13 - 20 - 00 443 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE MARK A. CANTU

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa 1
Relator Mark A. Cantu , proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to hold a hearing and rule on “Plaintiff’s Second Amended Motion to Dismiss a/k/a Plea to the Jurisdiction.” Relator has also filed an emergency motion seeking to stay depositions which are scheduled for November 2 , 3, and 4 . We deny both the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief without prejudice.

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(d) (“When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case,” but when “denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); id . R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2 To obtain relief by writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that the trial court committed a clear abuse of discretion and that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am ., 494 S.W.3d 708, 712 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding);
Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

– 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The relator bears the burden to properly request and show entitlement to mandamus relief. See
Walker , 827 S.W.2d at 837; see In re Carrington , 438 S.W.3d 867, 868 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2014, orig. proceeding); In re Villarreal , 96 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. App.

—Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding). This burden requires that relator provide the reviewing court with a sufficient record to establish the right to mandamus relief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.7 ; Walker , 827 S.W.2d at 837; In re Carrington , 438 S.W.3d at 869; In re Davidson , 153 S.W.3d 490, 491 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2004, orig. proceeding).
Because relator failed to provide us with a record to support his petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief, this Court concludes that he has not met his
burden to obtain relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency reli e f wit hout prejudice

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a), 52.10(b). LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice Delivered and filed the 30th day of October, 2020

.
#### § 102-33.445 What accident and incident data must we report?

You must report within 14 calendar days to GSA, Aviation Policy Division, 1800 F St. NW., Washington, DC 20405, all aviation accidents and incidents that your agency is required to report to the NTSB. You may also report other incident information. GSA and the ICAP will use the collected accident/incident information in conjunction with FAIRS' data, such as flying hours and missions, to calculate aviation safety statistics for the Federal aviation community and to share safety lessons-learned.
Exhibit 10.1


               AMENDMENT TO AUTO LOAN PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT ("Amendment') to the AUTO LOAN PURCHASE AND SALE
AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated and effective June 5, 2000 by and between E-LOAN,
Inc. ("E-LOAN") and AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. ("AmeriCredit") is
entered into and effective this 1st of January, 2001:

         FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION the receipt and sufficiency of
which is expressly acknowledged by the parties hereto, E-LOAN and AmeriCredit
agree as follows:

1.       Section 1.5 and Exhibit E of the Agreement provide for payment of an
         Origination or Referral Fee ("fee") to E-LOAN by AmeriCredit per booked
         loan in an amount based on loan closure rate (see schedule below).

          ------------------------------- ----------------------------
                   Closure Rate                  Referral Fee
          ------------------------------- ----------------------------
                       [*]                            [*]
          ------------------------------- ----------------------------
                       [*]                            [*]
          ------------------------------- ----------------------------
                       [*]                            [*]
          ------------------------------- ----------------------------
                       [*]                            [*]
          ------------------------------- ----------------------------
                       [*]                            [*]
          ------------------------------- ----------------------------

2.       From the date of this Amendment until June 30, 2001, AmeriCredit agrees
         to pay E-LOAN a flat fee of [*] per booked loan with no additional
         origination or referral fee payment. Beginning July 1, 2001, these flat
         fee payments shall cease and the closure based pricing scheme outlined
         above shall resume.

The Agreement is hereby modified and amended to incorporate the terms and
conditions set forth herein, which shall supersede and prevail over any
conflicting terms of the Agreement. Except for this change to provisions related
to payment of fees, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in
full force and effect.

AMERICREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.         E-LOAN, Inc.


By:   /s/ Michael T. Miller                  By:   /s/ Joseph J. Kennedy
      ----------------------------                 ----------------------------
      Authorized Signature - Title                 Authorized Signature - Title

Name:  Michael T. Miller                     Name:  Joe Kennedy

Title:  Executive Vice President -           Title: President and COO
        e-Services

                                             By:   /s/ Matt Roberts
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Authorized Signature - Title

                                             Name:  Matt Roberts

                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer
FILED

March 10, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

JANUARY 1999 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE ) C.C.A. NO. 03C01-9805-CC-00170

)

Appellee, ) BLOUNT COUNTY

)

v. ) Hon. D. Kelly Thomas, Judge

)

BRIAN THOMAS KLUEVER, )

) (Denial of Full Probation)

Appellant. )

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

JULIE MARTIN (On Appeal) JOHN KNOX WALKUP 

Attorney at Law Attorney General & Reporter

P. O. Box 426

Knoxville, TN 37901-0426

GEORGIA BLYTHE FELNER

Counsel for the State

MACK GARNER (At Trial) Criminal Justice Division

District Public Defender Cordell Hull Bldg., Second Floor

419 High St. 425 Fifth Ave. North

Maryville, TN 37804 Nashville, TN 37243-0493

MICHAEL L. FLYNN

District Attorney General

EDWARD BAILEY, JR.

Assistant District Attorney General

363 Court St.

Maryville, TN 37804

AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20 

OPINION FILED: ________________ 

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR.,

JUDGE
2

OPINION

The defendant, Brian Thomas Kluever, appeals pursuant to Rule 3

of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure from the trial court’s denial of full

probation. The defendant pleaded guilty to felony evading arrest, to driving on a

suspended license (second offense) and driving while under the influence (first

offense). As part of the plea agreement, the defendant agreed to an effective

sentence of one year, but the manner of service was left to the discretion of the

trial judge. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court ordered the defendant to

serve 120 days in jail with the balance of the sentence to be served on probation. 

The defendant will be eligible for work release after serving 48 hours. 

 One issue is presented for review. The defendant contends that

after a 48-hour period of incarceration and an alcohol treatment program, he

should be allowed to serve the balance of the 120 days on the weekend. This

court has conducted a de novo review of the record pursuant to Tennessee

Code Annotated section 40-35-401(d). We conclude that the record supports

the trial court’s findings.

The trial court denied full probation after the service of the

minimum sentence because the defendant had an extensive criminal record,

because he had previously received probated sentences, and because he had

been convicted of two offenses while he was on bond for these charges. The

trial judge concluded that the defendant’s prospects for rehabilitation were very

slim due to his abuse of alcohol and drugs. 

This court has read the briefs of the parties and the law governing

the issue presented for review and concludes that no error of law requiring
3

reversal of the judgment is apparent on the record and that an opinion in this

case would have no precedential value . Therefore, we affirm the judgment of

the trial court pursuant to Rule 20 of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals. 

__________________________

JAMES CURWOOD WITT JR., Judge

CONCUR:

______________________________

GARY R. WADE, Presiding Judge

______________________________

NORMA McGEE OGLE, Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 99.2




                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Angelica Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 26, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
T. M. Armstrong, Senior Vice President - Finance & Administration and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements
                           of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                           Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the
                           Company.



                                   /s/ T. M. Armstrong
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   T. M. Armstrong
                                   Senior Vice President - Finance &
                                   Administration and Chief Financial Officer
                                   of Angelica Corporation

                                   June 6, 2003



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS’ CONSENT 

 

The Board of Directors 

Cotelligent, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-31914,333-33312,333-67589, 333-3388 and 333-103978) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-53899 and 333-111550) on Form S-4 of Cotelligent, Inc., of our report dated April 14, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofCotelligent, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Cotelligent, Inc. 

 

/s/ Rowbotham & Company LLP 

 

San Francisco,California 

April 14, 2005
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jennifer Dawson, Chief Financial Officer of Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Jennifer DawsonName:
Jennifer DawsonTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
March 31, 2010








This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 1:22-cv-23174-RKA Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2022 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23174-RKA Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2022 Page 2 of 2
[Civ. *No.*2370.

Fourth Appellate District.

October 11, 1939.]

#### LENA AYER PETER, Appellant, v. ALICE M. FULLEN, Respondent.

No appearance for Appellant.

Wolford & Heald for Respondent.

GRIFFIN, J. —

This is a motion on behalf of respondent and cross-complainant Alice M. Fullen, based on an amended notice of motion duly served upon appellant, to dismiss the appeal.  The motion is predicated upon the grounds that the transcript has not been filed within the prescribed statutory time, and that the notice of appeal did not contain any request that a transcript be made up and prepared, and that no request was ever made to the clerk of the court in which the action was brought to make up and prepare the transcript, and that no proceeding for a bill of exceptions or for a transcript under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure is pending in the trial court, and that the time to institute the same has expired. A certificate of the clerk *116of the Superior Court of Imperial County to this effect has been duly filed herein.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed *(Wood*v. *Peterson Farms Co.,*131 Cal. App. 312 [21 Pac. (2d) 468]). In accordance with the written stipulation of the parties duly filed, it is ordered that a *remittitur*issue forthwith.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.
#### § 302-6.207 What factors should we consider in determining whether quarters are temporary?

In determining whether quarters are “temporary”, you should consider factors such as reasonable time when the employee's residence at the old official station becomes temporary and no longer suitable for permanent residence (*e.g.,* household goods have been shipped and are unavailable to the employee and their immediate family), the duration of the lease, movement of household goods into the quarters, the type of quarters, the employee's expressions of intent, attempts to secure a permanent dwelling, and the length of time the employee occupies the quarters.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph E. Porcello,
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Joseph E. Porcello
----------------------
Joseph E. Porcello
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
April 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren, Inc. and will be retained by Anaren, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.