alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of correction and extension of comment period. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The agency published a notice of availability for a draft environmental impact statement (EIS No. 000185) for the Fernow Experimental Forest on June 16, 2000, in the                         **Federal Register**                         (65 FR 37780). The comment due date in the notice was listed as July 31, 2000. Prior to the publication of the notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         the agency had sent a copy of the draft EIS to interested parties on June 7, 2000, but had listed the comment due date as August 2, 2000. To avoid confusion about the date the comments are due, the Forest Service is                               ( print page 41429)                            extending the comment period to August 7, 2000.                     

# DATES:

Written comments are due by August 7, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Forest Service, USDA, Timber and Watershed Laboratory, P.O. Box 404, Parsons, WV 26287-0404 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Beth Adams, Project Leader, at (304) 478-2000. 

Dated: June 28, 2000. 

Barbara C. Weber, 

Associate Deputy Chief for Research and Development. 

[FR Doc. 00-16855 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 444

For the relief of the heirs and assigns of Hattie Davis Rogers of the Nez

Perce Indian Reservation, Idaho.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. LAROCCO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of the heirs and assigns of Hattie Davis

Rogers of the Nez Perce Indian Reservation, Idaho.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. PAYMENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury

5 shall pay, out of any money in the United States Treasury

6 that is not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $108,000

7 to the heirs and assigns of Hattie Davis Rogers who hold

8 a title interest in Lot 1, Block 8 in Tolyaulkt’s Addition

9 to the Town of Fort Lapwai.
2

•HR 444 IH

1 (b) DISTRIBUTION OF PAYMENTS.—The money ap2 propriated under subsection (a) shall be distributed to the

3 heirs and assigns of Hattie Davis Rogers by the Northern

4 Idaho Agency of the Bureau of Indian Affairs in accord5 ance with the shares each of the heirs and assigns of Hat6 tie Davis Rogers holds in Lot 1, Block 8 in Tolyaulkt’s

7 Addition to the Town of Fort Lapwai, Idaho.

8 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

9 Acceptance of the payments made under section 1 by

10 the heirs and assigns of Hattie Davis Rogers shall con11 stitute full satisfaction of all claims of the estate of Hattie

12 Davis Rogers, her heirs and assigns, against the United

13 States arising out of the loss of the use of Lot 1, Block

14 8 in Tolyaulkt’s Addition to the Town of Fort Lapwai,

15 Idaho, that is located on the Nez Perce Indian Reservation

16 in the State of Idaho and was the subject of Brooks

17 against Nez Perce County, Idaho, et al., Civ. 2–72–27 (D.

18 ID. 1983), as a result of the acts or omissions of the

19 United States.

Æ
#### § 302-12.112 May we require an employee to use a mortgage service provider specified by the RSC?

No. Under the Real Estate Procedures Settlement Act (RESPA), you may not require that the employee obtain any mortgage from a lender specified by the RSC. The RSC may provide the employee access to multiple mortgage service providers as long as there is no use requirement, and the employee is provided a choice. Allowing the RSC to provide access to multiple providers is not part of the standard terms for a homesale program, but it may provide a pricing advantage in negotiations with potential RSCs, as well as an opportunity for better management of the homesale process.

[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18344, Apr. 1, 2011]
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.927 Amendment of applications. ( a ) Pending applications may be amended as a matter of right if they have not been designated for hearing or listed in a public notice as accepted for filing for competitive bidding, except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section.
( b ) Applicants for an initial license in auctionable services may amend such applications only in accordance with Subpart Q of this part.
( c ) Amendments to non-auction applications that are applied for under Part 101 or that resolve mutual exclusivity may be filed at any time, subject to the requirements of § 1.945 of this part.
( d ) Any amendment to an application for modification must be consistent with, and must not conflict with, any other application for modification regarding that same station.
( e ) Amendments to applications designated for hearing may be allowed by the presiding officer or, when a proceeding is stayed or otherwise pending before the full Commission, may be allowed by the Commission for good cause shown. In such instances, a written petition demonstrating good cause must be submitted and served upon the parties of record.
( f ) Amendments to applications are also subject to the service-specific rules in applicable parts of this chapter.
( g ) Where an amendment to an application specifies a substantial change in beneficial ownership or control (*de jure* or *de facto*) of an applicant, the applicant must provide an exhibit with the amendment application containing an affirmative, factual showing as set forth in § 1.948(i)(2).
( h ) Where an amendment to an application constitutes a major change, as defined in § 1.929, the amendment shall be treated as a new application for determination of filing date, public notice, and petition to deny purposes.
( i ) If a petition to deny or other informal objection has been filed, a copy of any amendment (or other filing) must be served on the petitioner. If the FCC has issued a public notice stating that the application appears to be mutually exclusive with another application (or applications), a copy of any amendment (or other filing) must be served on any such mutually exclusive applicant (or applicants).
[63 FR 68927, Dec. 14, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 53238, Oct. 1, 1999; 70 FR 61058, Oct. 20, 2005]
# Comments on: 2021-2349: Infernal Technology, LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc.
#### Shantanu NARANG; et al., Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-72662.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 2004.*

Decided March 24, 2004.

Suzanne B. Friedman, Esq., Attorney at Law, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Terri J. Scadron, Esq., Leslie McKay, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before B. FLETCHER, LEAVY and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Chandar Kaur Narang and her son Shantanu Narang, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7) without opinion an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of removal.

*993Petitioners’ contentions that the BIA’s streamlining regulations violate their rights to due process and are void for vagueness are foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 849-51 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that the BIA’s streamlining procedure does not violate an alien’s due process rights).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0 428 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TONY RAY MANYGUNS,

Defendant and Appellant .

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until June 1 9 , 2023 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court May 10 2023

05/10/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0428
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration 

# AGENCY:

Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Correction.

In notice document 00-15901 appearing on page 39151 in the issue of Friday, June 23, 2000, make the following correction: 

On page 39151, in the first column, in the first paragraph, fourteen lines down, the second to last sentence should read as follows: 

“To do so, dial: 800-545-4387, then enter the access code ID # M31053, or 700-991-1738 (for Federal Government employees), then enter the access code ID # 28353.” 

Dated: June 29, 2000. 

Jane M. Harrison, 

Director of Policy Review and Coordination. 

[FR Doc. 00-16865 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
# Diario Oficial C 34A/31 d

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 34A |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 61.° año31 de enero de 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 34A

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

61.° año31 de enero de 2018

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrección de errores |
| 2018/C 34 A/01 | Corrección de errores de la convocatoria de oposiciones generales — EPSO/AD/354/17 — Juristas lingüistas (AD 7) de lengua letona (LV) EPSO/AD/355/17 — Juristas lingüistas (AD 7) de lengua maltesa (MT) ( DO C 418 A de 7.12.2017 ) | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

Corrección de errores

2018/C 34 A/01

Corrección de errores de la convocatoria de oposiciones generales — EPSO/AD/354/17 — Juristas lingüistas (AD 7) de lengua letona (LV) EPSO/AD/355/17 — Juristas lingüistas (AD 7) de lengua maltesa (MT) ( DO C 418 A de 7.12.2017 )

( DO C 418 A de 7.12.2017 )

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

Corrección de errores

| 31.1.2018 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 34/1

---

Corrección de errores de la convocatoria de oposiciones generales

EPSO/AD/354/17 — Juristas lingüistas (AD 7) de lengua letona (LV)

EPSO/AD/355/17 — Juristas lingüistas (AD 7) de lengua maltesa (MT)

(
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 418 A de 7 de diciembre de 2017
  )

(2018/C 034 A/01)

En la página 1

donde dice:

«El plazo de inscripción finaliza el 16 de enero de 2018 a las 12.00 horas, hora central europea»,

debe decir:

debe decir:

«El plazo de inscripción finaliza el 30 de enero de 2018 a las 12.00 horas, hora central europea».

En la página 5

En la página 5

donde dice:

donde dice:

«PLAZO Y LUGAR DE PRESENTACIÓN DE LAS CANDIDATURAS

Las candidaturas deberán presentarse en línea en la página web de la EPSO: http://jobs.eu-careers.eu hasta el:

16 de enero de 2018 a las 12.00 horas, hora central europea»,

debe decir:

debe decir:

«PLAZO Y LUGAR DE PRESENTACIÓN DE LAS CANDIDATURAS

Las candidaturas deberán presentarse en línea en la página web de la EPSO: http://jobs.eu-careers.eu hasta el:

30 de enero de 2018 a las 12.00 horas, hora central europea».

---
No. 11-68.

#### Gargano et ux. *v.*Thomas Graves Landing Condominium Trust et al.

App. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I John A. Donohoe, President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
based on my knowledge:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which this
          certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.


                                        /s/  JOHN A. DONOHOE, JR.
Dated: November 14, 2002                _________________________
                                         John A. Donohoe, Jr.,
                                         PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                                         INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




<PAGE>
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

 

Circuit Mediation Office Statistics 

2017 Calendar Year

(January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017) 

 

 

Appeals settled: 2 

• Patent: 1 

• Non-patent: 1 

Appeals not settled; mediation terminated: 15

• Patent: 10

• Non-patent: 5 

Success rate - overall (of appeals selected for mediation): 12% 

• Patent: 9%

• Non-patent: 17%
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.3002 Structural rules and prohibitions. ( a ) *General prohibitions.* An employee shall not: ( 1 ) Directly or indirectly, solicit or coerce the offering of a gift, donation or bequest to the Commission from a regulated entity or other prohibited source; or
( 2 ) Accept gifts of cash pursuant to this subpart.
( b ) *Referral of offers to designated agency ethics official.* Any person who seeks to offer any gift to the Commission under the provisions of this subpart shall make such offer to the Commission's designated agency ethics official. In addition, any Commission employee who is contacted by a potential donor or the representative thereof for the purpose of discussing the possibility of making a gift, donation or bequest to the Commission shall immediately refer such person or persons to the Commission's designated agency ethics official. The designated agency ethics official shall, in consultation with other agency ethics officials, make a determination concerning whether acceptance of such offers would create a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest. Agency ethics officials may also advise potential donors and their representatives of the types of equipment, property or services that may be of use to the Commission and the procedures for effectuating gifts set forth in this subpart. The Commission may, in its discretion, afford public notice before accepting any gift under authority of this subpart.
#### Aladino A. Perez, Respondent, v Hi-Mike, Inc., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[628 NYS2d 562]

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated April 27, 1994, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted the plaintiff’s cross motion to amend the complaint.

*448Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

CPLR 3025 (b) permits liberal amendment of the pleadings provided that the amendment does not unduly prejudice the non-moving party. The record shows that the defendant had sufficient and timely notice of the specific area in which the plaintiff’s accident occurred and its possible liability for his injuries. Consequently, the defendant was not prejudiced by the court’s ruling to permit amendment of the complaint merely to reflect a more accurate measurement of the accident site.

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
#### § 15.122 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

JOHN LEWIS PRATT, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 

) 

G.H. JACKSON, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

NOV 302009 

Clerk, U.S. District and 

Bankruptcy Courts 

09 2270 

This matter comes before the Court upon review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and 

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted but the 

complaint will be dismissed. 

"Three inter-related judicial doctrines - standing, mootness, and ripeness - ensure that 

federal courts assert jurisdiction only over 'Cases' and 'Controversies. '" Worth v. Jackson, 451 

F.3d 854,855 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (quoting U.S. Const. art. III, § 2). A party has standing ifhis 

claims "spring from an 'injury in fact' - an invasion of a legally protected interest that is 

'concrete and particularized,' 'actual or imminent' and 'fairly traceable' to the challenged act of 

the defendant, and likely to be redressed by a favorable decision in the federal court." Navegar, 

Inc. v. United States, 103 F.3d 994, 998 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (quoting Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 

504 U.S. 555,560-61 (1992)). 

Plaintiff appears to bring this action on behalf of Eddie D. Pratt, who allegedly was 

arrested by a police officer in Candor, North Carolina. He is a lay person who is not qualified to 

appear in this Court on behalf of another person. See 28 U.S.c. § 1654; Georgiades v. 

Martin-Trigona, 729 F.2d 831,834 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Even though plaintiff may represent 
himself as a pro se litigant, it does not appear that he has sustained an actual injury caused by the 

named defendant's actions. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for 

lack of standing. 

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued separately on this 

same date. 

rk±~.~ United States District Judge 

Date: \ \ I \~ \61
No. 10-11276.

#### Hunt *v.*Sandhir et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
April 30, 2012

*No.*10-1553.

No. 11-163.

No. 11-582.

#### Beard et ux. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Grapevine Imports, Ltd., et al. v. United States. Salman Ranch, Ltd., et al. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 633 F. 3d 616;

C. A. Fed. Cir. Reported below: 636 F. 3d 1368; and

C. A. 10th Cir. Reported below: 647 F. 3d 929. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of *United States*v. *972
      *Home Concrete & Supply, LLC, ante,*p. 478. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
### -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 38 39 40 41 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/04 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00441-CR

IN RE NELSON PARNELL, JR.

Original Proceeding

ORDER

Nelson Parnell, Jr.’s “Motion for Order of Relief Sought: TRAP 10.1(a) 1,2,3,4”

filed on February 6, 2017 is denied. The State filed a motion for extension of time to file 

its response in this matter. The Court granted the State’s motion, and the State’s response 

is now due February 15, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed February 15, 2017
Opinion issued October 6, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00440-CV

———————————

IN RE KIMBERLY ANN MORKA, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kimberly Ann Morka seeks a writ of mandamus to require the trial court to 

vacate its October 9, 2016 order denying her request for enforcement of a foreign 

custody order, and to order the trial court to grant her request.1

We deny the petition.

 

1 The underlying case is Morka v. Morka, cause number 2014-48898A, pending in 

the 247th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable John Schmude,

presiding.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 07/08/08 

CASE NUMBER: S08-0006

RELATED CASES: 

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 1-2 1 

KEYWORDS:LUNG OVERLOAD

 MUTA

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT

FATE: Solid with MP = 1347 ΕC (M)

S < 0.1 mg/L at 25 ΕC (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 ΕC (E)

BP > 400 ΕC (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong 

PBT Potential: P3B1T1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl 

HEALTH: Not absorbed through the skin; poor absorption from the lung and GI tract (analog). 

Concern for lung toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for poorly soluble particles 

 rat inhalation NOAEL = 10 mg/m3, signs of lung overload at 50 mg/m3) and mutagenicity 

based on titanium oxide. 

 *CEB HEALTH: Low moderate concern (Inhalation) 

Test data: single intratracheal instillation, observation for up to 6 months: clearance halflife = 2.2 mo 

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are:

fish 96-h LC50 = * P 

daphnid 48-h LC50 = * P 

green algal 96-h EC50 = * P 

fish chronic value = * P 

SANITIZED Page 1 of 2
daphnid ChV = * P 

algal ChV = * P

Predictions are based on SARs for Ti oxides; SAR chemical class = Ti oxide; solid with mp = 

1347 C: S < 1 g/L at 20 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients 

and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; 

low concern for toxicity; 

assessment factor = 10.0

concern concentration = * 

*CEB ECOTOX: No releases to water

SAT Co-chair: Leonard Keifer 564-8916 

SANITIZED Page 2 of 2