alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
"F

100

100

100

B O O T C O V E R D

L U B E C R D

B AY R D

L U B E C R D

S O U T H S T

¬«189

MAINE

MAINE

MAINE

MAINE

U

NIT

E

D

S

TAT

E

S

UNITED STATES

CANADA

C

A

N

A

D

A

JOHNSON BAY

GRAND MANAN CHANNEL

Lubec

South

Lubec

West Quaddy

Head Light

Lubec

Channel

Light

Dudley

Island

Sail

Rock

Popes

Folly

Gull

Rock

Franklin Delano

Roosevelt

Memorial Bridge

Morton

Ledge

Middle

Ground

Wormell

Ledges

Gravel

Bar

Mowry

Lubec Point

Neck

West

Quoddy

Head

Woodward

Point

LubecTown

Cemetery

Moose

River

Eastport

Lubec West

Lubec

Eastport

OE E

FEET

FEET

FEET

FEET

000m

6

6

67

49 000m 70 N

E 000m 59

E

49

66

68

67

59

49

49

49

60

49

49

62 6

6 6

68

64

61

69

60

63

49

6

49

49

49

62

65

64

66

67

60 6

000m

6

49

6

6

49

49

61

6

59

49

63

66

58

49

49

65

N

49

49

65

64

49

49

63 64

71

6

6

59 6

6

66°52'30"

47'30" 30"

50' 50'

47'

440 000

1 400 000

400 000

1 380 000

49

61

60

70

49

69

49

49

63

49

65 66

61

6 6

58

62 67 6

52'

00'

55'

45'

52'

45'

44°

00'

67° 57' 55' 66°

30"

30" 30"

57'

52'

67° 30"

44°

44° 30"

44°

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

MAINE

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

LUBEC, ME-NB

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

LUBEC QUADRANGLE

MAINE-NEW BRUNSWICK

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Imagery..................................................NAIP, August 2009

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2009

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 1999

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 19T

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Maine Coordinate System of 1983 (east

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.0

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

FK

19T

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 27 ́

26 MILS

17° 29 ́

311 MILS
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****America�s wars [electronicresource].**
 
SuDoc Number:VA 1.34/2:W 26/

Item Number:0989-B-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000826933
 
2001| 2002 | 2009 | 2010
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2019
2021
 
April 27, 2020
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 11, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D21-1477

Lower Tribunal No. F15-7423

Blitz Monestine,

Appellant, 

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carmen 

Cabarga, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant 

Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. State v. Gutierrez, 10 So. 3d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

2
#### § 105-50.202-6 Communications services.

GSA will continue to make its bulk rate circuit ordering services available for use by State and local governments. Under a revised tariff effective December 12, 1971, GSA will bill the State and local governments for their share of the TEL PAK costs. Services provided prior to December 12, 1971, will be billed by the contractors under the former arrangements. In addition, certain activities, such as surplus property agencies which have frequent communications with Federal agencies, will be given access to the Federal Telecommunications System switchboards.
300

301

302

303

304

305

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:23:11-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Linster W. Fox, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Anacomp, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are  responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities,  particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual  report)  that has  materially  affected,  or is
          reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which are
          reasonably  likely to  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting.



Date: August 12, 2003



/s/Linster W. Fox
_________________________
Linster W. Fox
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 301-53.5 Are there exceptions to the mandatory use of contract City Pair Program fares and an agency's travel management service?

Yes, the exceptions are in accordance with §§ 301-10.111 and 301-10.112 of this chapter for the mandatory use of a contract City Pair Program fare, and § 301-73.103 of this chapter for the mandatory use of a travel management service.

[FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55706, Sept. 12, 2022]
1445 Market Street ▪ Denv er ▪ CO, 80202
Tel: (303) 620 8083 June 1 , 20 1 2

Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590

RE: DOT

- OST

- 2012

- 0083

Dear Secretary LaHood:

On behalf of the Metro Denver Aviation Coalition (MDAC), please accept t his letter of support for the application of V olaris to operate scheduled passenger service between Denver International Airport (“DEN”) and Mexico City’s Benito Ju á rez International Airport.

MDAC is a n affiliate of the Metro Denver E conomic Development Corporation dedicated to the continued growth of Metro Denver’s aviation industry and the success of D EN and the region’s general aviation and reliever airports

. Its membership encompasses a broad spectrum of business leaders from both the private and pub lic sectors who provide advocacy and support in such areas as job growth planning, airport and infrastructure development, and route expansion and retention.

MDAC believes an expanded passenger service between DEN and Mexico City will be economically b eneficial to growing the local and our national economy. Mexico is one of the top export nations for Colorado's goods and services, and the improved passenger service will provide opportunities to expand these trade and economic relationships and increase visits to Colorado and

the mountain west for business and recreation.

DEN has lacked year

- round nonstop service to Mexico City since the bankruptcy of Mexicana in August 2010. The introduction of new service by Volaris will stimulate market demand, furth er growing passenger traffic that will benefit all carriers. In addition, new international air service is a key driver of new jobs and economic activity in the Denver metro area and across the State of

Colorado.1445 Market Street ▪ Denv er ▪ CO, 80202
Tel: (303) 620 8083 Denver and Colorado are home to one of the largest Mexican

- American populations in the United States, and Mexico City ranks as one of DEN’s largest international markets. The strong community of interest, in addition to the growing business, tourism and cultural links between
Colorado and Mexico, will greatly benefit from this new service.

Thank you in advance for your consideration. We urge you to approve this application.

Sincerely,

Travis Vallin
Chair, Metro Denver Aviation Coalition
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 11.1

Statement re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         For the Year Ended
                                                            December 31,

                                                         1996          1995
                                                     ------------  ------------
     <S>                                             <C>           <C>
     Net income applicable to common stock and
      common stock equivalents...................... $  3,132,921  $  2,460,632
                                                     ============  ============

     Average number of common stock shares
      outstanding...................................    3,790,909     3,931,996
     Common stock equivalents on employee stock
      ownership plan stock allocated................       27,364        12,508
                                                     ------------  ------------

                        TOTAL                           3,818,273     3,919,488
                                                     ============  ============

                        Earnings Per Share           $       0.82  $       0.63
                                                     ============  ============
</TABLE>
a "
KAPP 2985 82°38" 5 37"
L L \ 1 L | 1 ! fl ae re |
| Scale 1:20,000
4 g ar) LL
North Yacht Basin 10 7 2
21
7 oT [-
7 24 iz
29
4 Central Yacht Basin 28,1050
24 28
4 fue pribGe t
Honcee er
25
q South Yacht Basin 2
27° ENTRANCE CHANNEL 26 27°
46° Lu North quarter 18.9 1 46°
S875 Middle halt 207 46'
© South quarter 19.4 25
> DOME April 1996 -
Z “AERO
4 RotW&a 23 a
Ag 2 \ Port of St Petersbur 15 ry
0 4 15 OR seas 5 1
} F 3 ia on ‘ im
10 17 | \
15 CG sta |\ at
Bayon Her) a Dee A gp tenstinn 12 a) Pp At] reeves
7 yer Rr on ee ee a Le Sh ap
pee ENTRANCE CHANNEL (20 not) vA
Booker Gr BQ 07h 8
125 3
= lo} 19
4 e\ HH [
iF" r 4 al|
ate { I Fl
| —— == = >
Yards
4 SSS en ee
° 7000
T Terr TT TTT
82%0" | , 37"
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2921-000]

Take notice that on June 13, 2000, JPower, Inc., tendered for filing notice of change in status. JPower requests that the name JPower and JPower's market based rate schedule under ER95-1421-000 be transferred to Great Lakes Energy Trading, LLC effective immediately.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before July 7, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16701  Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-89.

#### Vieira *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-608.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TELECOMMUNICATION 

Use of 1850-1915 MHz and 1930-1995 MHz Bands 

 Protocol Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MEXICO 

Signed at Washington June 8, 2012 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MEXICO 

Telecommunication: Use of 1850-1915 MHz and 

 1930-1995 MHz Bands 

 Protocol signed at Washington June 8, 2012; 

 Entered into force June 8, 2012.
2715 

2716 

2717 

2718 

2719 

2720 

2721 

2722 

2723 

2724 

2725 

2726 

2727 

2728 

2729 

2730 

2731 

2732 

2733 

2734 

2735 

2736 

2737 

2738 

2739 

2740 

2741 

2742 

2743 

2744 

2745 

2746 

2747 

2748 

2749 

2750 

2751 

2752 

2753 

2754 

2755 

2756 

2757 

2758 

2759 

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:23:03-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Order entered September 11, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00513-CR

JULIA ROSE DECATUR-SCHRADER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-80222-2012

ORDER

The reporter’s record has been filed in this appeal, but the clerk’s record is more than 

thirty days overdue. We have received a copy of the trial court’s order appointing counsel to 

represent appellant.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Collin County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record 

within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Collin County District Clerk’s Office, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
### ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form , Revision 2
. 5 Page 1 of 1 1/15/10 

### AD Title: Trent 800 Critical Part L ives Docket No. FAA

- 2010
- 0755 Directorate Identifier: 2010
- NE
- 12
- AD **Costs:** Costs per **Product** (e.g., engine, propeller) Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

h ours Lab or cost ( @ $8 5 /hour) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S
. Fleet Replace life limited parts. $ 0.00 45,000 $ 45,000.00 16 $ 720,000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0



### Total Cost s of compliance for U

. S
. fleet: $ 720,000



### Costs covered under warranty **S pecial considerations**  **for Econom ic Analysis**  **:** 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES explain below NO **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES explain below NO **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES explain below NO
**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES expl ain below NO 

### Explanation:
<PAGE>   1
COMMON STOCK                                                        COMMON STOCK
   NUMBER                                                              SHARES


                                   CONNETICS
                                  CORPORATION

                                                                      
THIS CERTIFICATE IS     INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF          SEE REVERSE SIDE
  TRANSFERABLE IN           THE STATE OF DELAWARE                  FOR CERTAIN
   BOSTON, MA OR                                                   DEFINITIONS
   NEW YORK, NY


THIS CERTIFIES THAT

                                    SPECIMEN
is the record holder of


              FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK,
                         PAR VALUE $.001 PER SHARE, OF

                             CONNETICS CORPORATION


transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or 
by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly 
endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by 
the Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation 
and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


   Dated:


                                     [SEAL]                              

         Secretary                                          President and Chief
                                                             Executive Officer


                                            COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED
                                                 BANKBOSTON, N.A.
                                                 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
                                                 BY                 

                                                           AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50820 Summary Calendar

RICHARD WILLIAM BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

No. 3:03-CV-530-DB

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Richard Brown, a Texas prisoner, was convicted of indecency with a child and sentenced to serve ten years in prison. Brown filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition, which the district court dismissed as untimely. This court granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) on the issue whether the delay in notifica-tion of the denial of Brown’s state habeas application merits

equitable tolling. Brown contends that he is actually innocent. We decline to consider this claim, because he has not received a COA on it. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1). Brown also argues that he is entitled to equitable tolling based on the delay in notification of the denial of his state habeas application and because he diligently pursued relief. Brown has not shown that he diligently pursued postconviction relief, see Phillips v. Donnelly, 216 F.3d 508, 511 (5th Cir. 2000); Coleman v. Johnson , 184 F.3d 398, 403 (5th Cir. 1999), or that he was prevented from timely filing his § 2254 petition on account of exceptional circumstances that were out of his control or because he was affirmatively misled, see Felder v. Johnson , 204 F.3d 168, 170-71 (5th Cir. 2000); Davis v. Johnson , 158 F.3d 806, 811 (5th Cir. 1998). Consequently, he has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in determining that he was not entitled to equitable tolling. See Larry v. Dretke , 361 F.3d 890, 897 (5th Cir. 2004). The judgment is AFFIRMED.