alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4344 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4344

   To prohibit ticket resale profiteering in or affecting interstate 
                               commerce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 1994

    Mr. Levy (for himself, Mr. King, and Mr. Bryant) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit ticket resale profiteering in or affecting interstate 
                               commerce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interstate Ticket Resale Prohibition 
Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF TICKET RESALE PROFITEERING.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 89 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1822. Ticket profiteering
    ``(a) Whoever knowingly, and for the profit of any individual or 
entity other than a non-profit entity, engages in the resale of a 
ticket, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, at a price that 
exceeds the broker's price, shall be fined under this title.
    ``(b) As used in this section--
            ``(1) the term `ticket' means any evidence of the right or 
        entry to any place of entertainment;
            ``(2) the term `place of entertainment' means a place where 
        there is any form of entertainment, diversion, recreation, or 
        show, and to which there is an admission charge;
            ``(3) the term `broker's price' means a price $5 greater 
        than--
                    ``(A) the price printed or otherwise indicated on 
                the ticket; or
                    ``(B) in the absence of that, the price set by the 
                operator of the place of entertainment for the 
                admission to that place evidenced by such ticket; and
            ``(4) the term `resale' means any sale of a ticket other 
        than by the operator (or operator's agent) of the place of 
        entertainment to which the ticket pertains.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 89 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``1822. Ticket profiteering.''.

                                 <all>
```
# Uradni list C 394/2017

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 394 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 6022. november 2017 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 394

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 6022. november 2017

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Evropska komisija |
| 2017/C 394/01 | Menjalni tečaji eura | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

2017/C 394/01

Menjalni tečaji eura

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

| 22.11.2017 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2017

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 394/1

---

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

21. novembra 2017

(2017/C 394/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuta | Menjalni tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | ameriški dolar | 1,1718 |
| JPY | japonski jen | 131,87 |
| DKK | danska krona | 7,4414 |
| GBP | funt šterling | 0,88498 |
| SEK | švedska krona | 9,9473 |
| CHF | švicarski frank | 1,1641 |
| ISK | islandska krona | |
| NOK | norveška krona | 9,6890 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | češka krona | 25,533 |
| HUF | madžarski forint | 312,93 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 4,2290 |
| RON | romunski leu | 4,6568 |
| TRY | turška lira | 4,6304 |
| AUD | avstralski dolar | 1,5466 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,5006 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 9,1545 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,7181 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 1,5878 |
| KRW | južnokorejski won | 1 276,68 |
| ZAR | južnoafriški rand | 16,4989 |
| CNY | kitajski juan | 7,7725 |
| HRK | hrvaška kuna | 7,5650 |
| IDR | indonezijska rupija | 15 850,94 |
| MYR | malezijski ringit | 4,8421 |
| PHP | filipinski peso | 59,335 |
| RUB | ruski rubelj | 69,5585 |
| THB | tajski bat | 38,406 |
| BRL | brazilski real | 3,8207 |
| MXN | mehiški peso | 22,2026 |
| INR | indijska rupija | 76,0705 |

Valuta

Menjalni tečaj

USD

ameriški dolar

1,1718

JPY

japonski jen

131,87

DKK

danska krona

7,4414

GBP

funt šterling

0,88498

SEK

švedska krona

9,9473

CHF

švicarski frank

1,1641

ISK

islandska krona

NOK

norveška krona

9,6890

BGN

lev

1,9558

CZK

češka krona

25,533

HUF

madžarski forint

312,93

PLN

poljski zlot

4,2290

RON

romunski leu

4,6568

TRY

turška lira

4,6304

AUD

avstralski dolar

1,5466

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,5006

HKD

hongkonški dolar

9,1545

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,7181

SGD

singapurski dolar

1,5878

KRW

južnokorejski won

1 276,68

ZAR

južnoafriški rand

16,4989

CNY

kitajski juan

7,7725

HRK

hrvaška kuna

7,5650

IDR

indonezijska rupija

15 850,94

MYR

malezijski ringit

4,8421

PHP

filipinski peso

59,335

RUB

ruski rubelj

69,5585

THB

tajski bat

38,406

BRL

brazilski real

3,8207

MXN

mehiški peso

22,2026

INR

indijska rupija

76,0705

---

(1)  Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.22 Authority for representation.

Any person, in a representative capacity, transacting business with the Commission, may be required to show his authority to act in such capacity.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"18-1763: AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING v. NEAPCO HOLDINGS LLC [ORDER], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zzKiJbL4p7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-23-2020-18-1763-american-axle-manufacturing-v-neapco-holdings-llc-order-18-1763-order-10-23-2020_1674428\/\">18-1763: AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING v. NEAPCO HOLDINGS LLC [ORDER], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-23-2020-18-1763-american-axle-manufacturing-v-neapco-holdings-llc-order-18-1763-order-10-23-2020_1674428\/embed\/#?secret=zzKiJbL4p7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“18-1763: AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING v. NEAPCO HOLDINGS LLC [ORDER], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"zzKiJbL4p7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING v. NEAPCO HOLDINGS LLC [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 18-1763 Origin: DCT Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1691]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Southwest Power Pool, Inc.; Notice of Settlement Conference

DATE:  January 19, 2000.
    Take notice that a Settlement Conference will be convened to 
discuss compensation for deferred maintenance costs in Docket No. ER99-
4392-000. The Settlement Conference is scheduled for Monday, January 
24, 2000, at 10:00 a.m. The Settlement Conference will be held at the 
Offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE, Washington, D.C. 20426, for the purpose of exploring settlement of 
the captioned proceeding.
    Any party as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information contact Moira Notargiacomo at (202) 208-
1079.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1691 Filed 1-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period March 31,
2005 (the "Report"), David J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, President and
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.
S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1). To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                        /S/ DAVID J. JOHNSON
                        --------------------
                        DAVID J. JOHNSON
                        PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                        MAY 13, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 304-6.8 Will the reports be made available for public inspection? Yes, OGE must make any report filed by an agency under this part (that is not protected from disclosure by statute) available for public inspection and copying on the later of the following two dates: ( a ) Within 30 days after the applicable due date.
( b ) Within 30 days after the date OGE actually receives the report.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"Federal Circuit Schedules April Session for the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Area - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"E6p2K8VDtE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/federal-circuit-schedules-april-session-for-the-minneapolis-saint-paul-area\/\">Federal Circuit Schedules April Session for the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Area<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/federal-circuit-schedules-april-session-for-the-minneapolis-saint-paul-area\/embed\/#?secret=E6p2K8VDtE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Federal Circuit Schedules April Session for the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Area” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"E6p2K8VDtE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is pleased to announce that it intends to sit in Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota as part of its April 2019 session.\u00a0 The Federal Circuit will continue to hold its regular session in Washington, D.C.\u00a0 The full notice is available here (pdf)."}
NEW YORK, NY 

TYSONS CORNER , VA 

CHICAC50, IL 

STAMFORD,C T 

PARSIPPANY, NJ 

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM 

AFFILIATE: OFFICE S 

MUMBAl , INDIA 

KELLEY DRYE S, WARREN LLP 

A LIMITED LPAQILITY PARTNERSHIP 

305 0 K STREET, N.W. 

SUITE 40 0 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 2000 7 

<202) 342-840 0 

August 25, 2010 

By Hand Delivery 

Ms. Dorothy Y. Beard 

Director, Office of Information Services 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

M-30, RoomW12-140 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

FACSIMILE 

(202 ) 342-S45 I 

www.ketlGydrye.co m 

DIREC T LINE : (202 ) 342-852 8 

EMAIL : dfisherigkelleydrye.co m 

—io.>=^ 

TT QO O 

:s:-n 

C3 CO 

Re: Application of UPS Europe SA and UPS International, Inc. for 

Exemption Authority (India-Sudan), Docket OST-2010-0210 

Dear Ms. Beard: 

On August 23, 2010, UPS Europe SA and UPS International, Inc. (the 

"Applicants") filed an Application for an exemption from the provisions of the Department's 

Order No. 98-2-5 ("Sudan Order") so as to permit the Applicants to operate one (1) one-way air 

freight forwarding movement to Sudan to transport medicine to treat malaria. 

The Applicants polled all persons served with the Application and hereby inform 

the Department that no party has any objection to the Application. Accordingly, the Applicants 

request that the Department grant the Application as soon as possible. 

Thank you very much for your assistance. 

Sincerely, 

Danielle K. Fisher 

cc: All parties (via e-mail) 

Brett Kruger (via e-mail) 

DC01/FISHD/425488.1
No. 10-11216.

#### Green *v.*Rudek.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 24.403 Authorization required.

No person shall use or operate any device for the transmission of energy or communications by radio in the services authorized by this part except as provided in this part.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-1108.2 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TELECOMMUNICATION 

Use of 698-806 MHz Band 

 Protocol Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MEXICO 

Signed at Mexico City and Antalya 

November 1 and 8, 2006 

 

 

 with 

 Appendices 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MEXICO 

Telecommunication: Use of 698-806 MHz Band 

 Protocol signed at Mexico City and Antalya 

 November 1 and 8, 2006; 

 Entered into force November 8, 2006. 

 With appendices.
#### § 50-203.16 Industry panel meetings.

The Secretary of Labor may, within his discretion, invite representatives of employers and employees in an industry to meet as an informal panel group to discuss with representatives of the Department of Labor the various questions relating to the issuance of a wage determination for the industry.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 2.960 Recognition of Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs). ( a ) The Commission may recognize Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs) which have been designated according to requirements of paragraph (b) or (c) of this section to issue grants of certification as required under this part. Certification of equipment by a TCB shall be based on an application with all the information specified in this part. The TCB shall review the application to determine compliance with the Commission's requirements and shall issue a grant of equipment certification in accordance with § 2.911.
( b ) In the United States, TCBs shall be accredited and designated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under its National Voluntary Conformity Assessment Evaluation (NVCASE) program, or other recognized programs based on ISO/IEC 17065 (incorporated by reference, see § 2.910) to comply with the Commission's qualification criteria for TCBs. NIST may, in accordance with its procedures, allow other appropriately qualified accrediting bodies to accredit TCBs. TCBs shall comply with the requirements in § 2.962 of this part.
( c ) In accordance with the terms of an effective bilateral or multilateral mutual recognition agreement or arrangement (MRA) to which the United States is a party, bodies outside the United States shall be permitted to authorize equipment in lieu of the Commission. A body in an MRA partner economy may authorize equipment to U.S. requirements only if that economy permits bodies in the United States to authorize equipment to its requirements. The authority designating these telecommunication certification bodies shall meet the following criteria. ( 1 ) The organization accrediting the prospective telecommunication certification body shall be capable of meeting the requirements and conditions of ISO/IEC 17011 (incorporated by reference, see § 2.910).
( 2 ) The organization assessing the telecommunication certification body shall appoint a team of qualified experts to perform the assessment covering all of the elements within the scope of accreditation. For assessment of telecommunications equipment, the areas of expertise to be used during the assessment shall include, but not be limited to, electromagnetic compatibility and telecommunications equipment (wired and wireless).
[64 FR 4995, Feb. 2, 1999, as amended at 80 FR 33444, June 12, 2015]
Exhibit 32.1














Section 1350


CERTIFICATION








The undersigned officer hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation for the quarter ended September 26, 2010 as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE Corporation.







Signed November 5, 2010.







/s/ Harry V. MaccarroneHarry V. MaccarroneChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-41048, 333-45002, and 333-85304) of Connetics Corporation and
in Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-46562, 333-61558, 333-82468,
333-58146, 333-85302, and 333-102619) pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, Stock Plan (2000), 2000 Non-Officer Employee Stock Plan,
International Stock Incentive Plan, 1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan and 2002
Non-Officer Employee Stock Plan of Connetics Corporation, of our report dated
January 24, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Connetics Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A)
for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 31, 2003
402 A.2d 555

#### Douglas BIXBY, a minor by his father and natural guardian James A. Bixby, Appellee in No. 649, and James A. Bixby, Individually, Appellant in No. 750, v. The FRANKLIN INSTITUTE, Appellant in No. 649, Appellee in No. 750, and Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Sept. 11, 1978.

Decided May 4, 1979.

*512Robert J. Murphy, Philadelphia, for appellant, The Franklin Institute and appellee at No. 750.

Sidney L. Wickenhaver, Philadelphia, for appellant James A. Bixby, individually; and appellees Douglas Bixby, a minor, et al., at No. 649.

No appearance entered nor brief filed for appellee Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

Before VAN der VOORT, WATKINS and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The Order of the Court below granting the Petition to Vacate in part the Order Approving the Settlement of the Minor’s Tort Claim is reversed and this case is remanded for consideration of the Petition to Vacate the said settlement by a Court En Banc of the Court below. The Motion to Quash the Appeal at No. 649 October Term, 1978, is refused. Said Order as it relates to the Appeal at No. 750 October Term, 1978, is affirmed.
#### §§ 24.816-24.829 [Reserved]