alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 302-6.203 What factors should we consider in determining whether the TQSE allowance is actually necessary? The factors you should consider include: ( a ) The length of time the employee should reasonably be expected to occupy their residence at the old official station before reporting for duty at the new official station. An employee and the employee's immediate family should continue to occupy the residence at the old official station for as long as practicable to avoid the necessity for temporary quarters.
( b ) The existence of less expensive alternatives. If a less expensive alternative to the TQSE allowance exists that will enable the employee to find permanent quarters at the new official station, you should consider such an alternative. For example, authorize a househunting trip instead of temporary quarters if it would cost less overall.
( c ) The existence of other opportunities to arrange for permanent quarters. Consider whether the employee had adequate opportunity to arrange for permanent quarters. For example, you should not authorize temporary quarters if the employee had adequate opportunity during an extended temporary duty assignment or long-term temporary change of station that became permanent, to arrange for permanent quarters.
029P16

#### Timothy Clarke, Personal Representative of the Estate of Erica Bohn v. Ashraf Gad Bakhom Mikhail, M.D.; Jessica Lynn Hardin, P.A., and Coastal Carolina Neuropsychiatric Center, P.A.

1. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-235)

1. Denied

2. Defs’ Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Dismissed as moot

3. Pit’s Motion to Amend PDR

3. Allowed
No. 11-5050.

#### Corbin *v.*Tennis, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 101.531 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000006814
<NAME> COMFORCE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                       533
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,454
<PP&E>                                           8,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,804
<BONDS>                                        131,541
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           158
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,356
<SALES>                                        230,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               230,188
<CGS>                                          187,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (24)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,602
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    641
<INCOME-TAX>                                       947
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (306)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (318)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-27-1996
<CASH>                                           3,553
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      765
<ALLOWANCES>                                        50
<INVENTORY>                                        653
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,745
<PP&E>                                          89,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,641
<BONDS>                                         27,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,584
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,385
<SALES>                                         21,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,016
<CGS>                                            1,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (9)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (11)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     360
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       349
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-11299.

#### Brown *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2017-1999: AC Technologies S.A. v. Amazon.com, Inc. - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hinCiDtLAq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-07-2018-2017-1999-ac-technologies-sa-v-amazoncom-inc-audio-uploaded\/\">2017-1999: AC Technologies S.A. v. Amazon.com, Inc.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-07-2018-2017-1999-ac-technologies-sa-v-amazoncom-inc-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=hinCiDtLAq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2017-1999: AC Technologies S.A. v. Amazon.com, Inc.” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"hinCiDtLAq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: AC Technologies S.A. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (mp3) Appeal Number: 2017-1999 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
# Comments on: 22-2092: WRIGHT v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION], Nonprecedential
#### § 25.150 Receipt of applications.

Applications received by the Commission are given a file number and a unique station identifier for administrative convenience. Neither the assignment of a file number and/or other identifier nor the listing of the application on public notice as received for filing indicates that the application has been found acceptable for filing or precludes subsequent return or dismissal of the application if it is found to be defective or not in accordance with the Commission's rules.

[78 FR 8425, Feb. 6, 2013]
#### § 22.900 Scope.

The rules in this subpart govern the licensing and operation of cellular radiotelephone systems. Licensing and operation of these systems are also subject to rules elsewhere in this part that apply generally to the Public Mobile Services. In case of conflict, however, the rules in this subpart govern.
Exhibit 4.4

            Amendment to First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa's Bylaws
               (Adopted on and Effective as of December 15, 2000)

         Article III,  Section 2 of the bylaws of First Federal  Savings Bank of
Iowa is amended to read as follows:

         Section 2. Number and Term.  The board of  directors  shall  consist of
seven members, and shall be divided into three classes as nearly equal in number
as possible. The member of each class shall be elected for a term of three years
and until their successors are elected and qualified. One class shall be elected
by ballot annually.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41072-41073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16669]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the 
Secretary publishes a list of information collections it has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance in 
compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35) and 5 CFR 1320.5. The following are those information collections 
recently submitted to OMB.
    1. Evaluation of the BodyWise Eating Disorder Initiative--NEW--The 
Office on Women's Health plans to conduct an evaluation of the initial 
demonstration phase of the BodyWise Eating Disorder initiative to look 
for changes in school practices and awareness regarding eating disorder 
issues. The study design features a pre-test/post-test model with 
questionnaires to be completed by a sample of middle school staff. 
Burden Information for Pre-test--Number of Respondents: 426; Burden Per 
Response: 20 minutes; Burden for Pre-test: 142 hours--Burden 
Information for Post-test--Number of Respondents: 396; Burden Per 
Response: 20 minutes; Burden for Post-test: 132 hours--Total Burden: 
274 hours.
    OMB Desk Officer: Allison Eydt.
    Copies of the information collection packages listed above can be 
obtained by calling the OS Reports Clearance Officer on (202) 690-6207. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent directly to the OMB desk officer designated 
above at the following address: Human Resources and Housing Branch, 
Office of Management and

[[Page 41073]]

Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 725 17th Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20503.
    Comments may also be sent to Cynthia Agens Bauer, OS Reports 
Clearance Officer, Room 503H, Humphrey Building, 200 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201. Written comments should be received 
on or before August 2, 2000.

    Dated: June 15, 2000.
Dennis P. Williams,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Budget.
[FR Doc. 00-16669 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 24-0069

_________________

APRIL MYERS, JAMES MYERS,

DARRYL WHITCANACK, PATRICIA

MILLER, EVERETT WESTERMAN,

PATRICIA WESTERMAN, JAMES

STEVENSON, LONNIE BEKEL, and

CINDY BEKEL,

 Plaintiffs and Appellants,

 v.

JOSEPH KLEINHANS and AMANDA

KLEINHANS,

 Defendants and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Matthew J. Wald, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 24 2024

07/24/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0069
LINDA LINGLE GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE CHAMBERS
HONOLULU January 30,2009

Ms. Laura Yoshi Acting Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94 105 Dear Ms. Yoshi: SUBJECT: Recommended Designation for the Revised 8-Hour Primary and Secondary Federal Ozone (03) National Ambient Air Quality Standards Pursuant to Section 107(d)of the Clean Air Act, I am recommending that the State of Hawaii be designated in attainment ofthe revised 8-hour primary and secondary O3National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The Department of Health (DOH), which manages the ambient air monitoring network, has determined that the quality-assured and certified O3data for the calendar years 2005 through 2007 is in attainment with the federal O3standards. As requiredin 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, the state operates one station using a Federal Equivalent Method sampler for the collection of O3data. Attachment I provides the data used for the calculation of the 8-hour standard design value. The three-year average of the fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour values was well below the revised O3NAAQS. Additionally, the station had an average 98 percent data capture rate which met the 90 percent data completeness requirement. Based on continuous compliance with the NAAQS and ongoing monitoring of air pollution sources, the state has determined that there are no anticipated changes or activities that would cause a significant vzriation frcm the currefitlymezsured O3va!~es. 

### Vre therefere ask fcr EPA's ccnsider~tim of our recommendation for attainment of the revised 8-hour O3standards. We look forward to working with EPA, Region 

### IX, on the final designation for this public health and environmental issue. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Wilfred Nagamine at the DOH, Clean Air Branch, at (808) 586-4200. Sincerely,

LINDA LINGLE 

# U Attachment 

# RECEIVED

c: Deborah Jordan, Director, Air Division (AIR-I), U.S. EPA, Region 

### IX Sean Hogan, Manager, Technical Support Office (AIR-7), U.S. EPA, Region 

### IX 

## FEB 

## 0 

## 3 

## 2009 AIR DIVISION U.S. €PA, REGION 9

### 'epp pa!j!ya3 PUB 

### pa~nss~-Al!~enb 'lua3a~ lsouayl

### 40 s~eaA aaJyl uo paseq sp~epuels hlepu03as PUB 

### hleu!~d ~noy-8 Mau ayljo luauu!eUe u! s! !!BMEH

### 40 apls ayl ~ssaua~a~duo~ elep 

## y,,s~ ueylssal SB~ 

### JeaA al6u!s ou pue '%06 ueyl~alea~6 S!elep ~U!JO~!UOUI jua!que P!IEA yy~ sAep 

### 40 luauad a6e~a~e aylasnwaq ~uaua~!nba~ ssaualalduo3 el~p aql slaau osle uo!yels s!yl -udd~~0.0 ueyl ssal s! (udd 8~0.0 01 pap~~~n~) 'udd c~~8~o-o) suo!ge~lua3uo3 

### €0 a6~~a~e .~noy-8 unu!xeuAl!ep ~sa~j6!y-yunoj Ienuue ayl

### 40 a6~~a~e JeaA-E ayl asneaaq splepuels 

### €0 hlepu03as PUB 

### hleu!~d aylslaau uo!gels s!yl *~eaA ayljo syluou

## zc sale~ado leyl uo!yels 6u!~ol!uou auozo auo sey !!BMBH

### 40 apls ayl
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT 

Bank of Florida - Southwest Florida, Naples, Collier County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida. 

Bank of Florida TrustCompany f/k/a Citizens Capital Management, Inc., Naples, Collier County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida. 

Bank of Florida - Southeast, Broward County, Florida. 

Organized under thelaws of the State of Florida. 

Bank of Florida - Tampa Bay, Hillsborough County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida
§ 13.17 Replacement license. ( a ) Each licensee or permittee whose original document is lost, mutilated, or destroyed may request a replacement. The application must be accompanied by the required fee and submitted to the address specified in part 1 of the rules.
( b ) Each application for a replacement General Radiotelephone Operator License, Marine Radio Operator Permit, First Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, Second Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, Third Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate, Radiotelegraph Operator Certificate, GMDSS Radio Operator's License, Restricted GMDSS Radio Operator's License, GMDSS Radio Maintainer's License, or GMDSS Radio Operator/Maintainer License must be made on FCC Form 605 and must include a written explanation as to the circumstances involved in the loss, mutilation, or destruction of the original document.
( c ) Each application for a replacement Restricted Radiotelephone Operator Permit or Restricted Radiotelephone Operator Permit-Limited Use must be on FCC Form 605.
( d ) A licensee who has made application for a replacement license may exhibit a copy of the application submitted to the FCC or a photocopy of the license in lieu of the original document.
[58 FR 9124, Feb. 19, 1993, as amended at 63 FR 68942, Dec. 14, 1998; 68 FR 46959, Aug. 7, 2003; 78 FR 23154, Apr. 18, 2013]
§ 101.1311 Initial EA license authorization. ( a ) Winning bidders must file an application (FCC Form 601) for an initial authorization in each market and frequency block.
( b ) Blanket licenses are granted for each market and frequency block. Applications for individual sites are not required and will not be accepted, except as specified in § 101.1329.
NE W YORK , N Y

TYSON S CORNER , V A CHICAC50 , I L STAMFORD,C T PARSIPPANY , N J BRUSSELS , BELGIU M AFFILIATE : OFFICE S MUMBAl , INDI A KELLE YDRY E S , WARRE N LL P ALIMITE D LPAQILIT YPARTNERSHI P 305 0 KSTREET , N.W . SUIT E 40 0 WASHINGTON , D.C . 2000 7

<202 ) 342-840 0

Augus t 25 , 201 0 B y Han dDeliver y Ms . Doroth y Y . Bear d Director , Offic e o f

Informatio n Service s Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E M-30 , RoomW12-14 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 FACSIMIL E (202 ) 342-S45 I www.ketlGydrye.co m

DIREC TLINE : (202 ) 342-852 8 EMAIL : dfisherigkelleydrye.co m

—io.>= ^
T T QO O :s:- n C 3 C O

Re : Applicatio n o f

UP S Europ e S A an dUP S International , Inc . for Exemptio n Authority (India-Sudan) , Docke t OST-2010-021 0 Dea r Ms . Beard :

O n Augus t

23 , 2010 , UP S Europ e S A an dUP S International , Inc . (th e "Applicants" ) fileda

n Applicatio n for

anexemptio nfromth e provision s o f th e Department' s Orde r No . 98-2- 5 ("Suda n Order" ) s o a s t o permi t th e Applicant s t o operat e on e (1 ) one-wa y ai r freight forwardin g movemen t

t o Suda n t o transport

medicin e t o trea t

malaria . Th e Applicant s polle dal l person s serve dwithth e Applicatio nan dhereb y infor m th e Departmen t

that n o part y ha s an y objectio nt o th e Application . Accordingly , th e Applicant s reques t that th e Departmen t

gran t th e Applicatio na s soo na s possible . Than k yo u very muc hfor

you r assistance . Sincerely , Daniell e K . Fishe r
cc : Al l partie s (vi ae-mail ) Brett Kruge r (vi ae-mail )

DC01/FISHD/425488. 1
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 29, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00393

- CR

Asel ABDYGAPPAROVA

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001CR4918A Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on October 6, 2014

. Two motions for extension of time have been granted, extending the deadline to December 15, 2014. This court’s order granting the second extension stated, “ THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME

THAT THE APPELLANT WILL BE GRANTED

. ”

The clerk’s office of this court notified appellant’s attorney that the deadline for filing the brief had passed. In response to that notice, appellant’s attorne y filed a third motion to extend time to file the appellant’s brief. The motion does not acknowledge the prior extensions or the order stating the last extension was a final extension. The motion is, however, GRANTED. Appellant’s attorney is ORDERED to file appellant’s brief in this court no later than January 1 5,

201 5 , or this appeal will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing without further

notice , and the trial court will be asked to consider whether sanctions against appellant’s att orney are appropriate. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2).

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court