alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Daou Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent K. Roach, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ Vincent K. Roach                                                   |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Vincent K. Roach
Chief Executive Officer and President
August 12, 2005 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
No. 11-9183.

#### Garcia *v.*Roden, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Norfolk.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### *M’Gruder v. Lyons.

January Term, 1851,

Richmond,

(Absent Cabell, P., and Brooke, J.)

Court of Appeals—Statute Regulating Jurisdictional Amount—Retrospective Effect.*—Tb e act in the Code limiting appeals to the Court of appeals to $200, applies to cases decided before the act went into effect, where the application for an appeal is made since.

This was an application for an appeal from a decree of the Circuit court of Albemarle county. The decree was rendered prior to the 1st of July 1850, when the new Code went into operation; and it was for a less sum than 200 dollars.

*

Statutes — Remedial — Retrospective Effect.—The citations of authorities against construing statutes retrospectively where they disturb vested rights do not apply to *remedial*statutes; by all the authorities the *remedial*statutes are an exception to the rule. Lackland v. Davenport, 84 Va. 640,5 S. E. Rep. 540, citing McGruder v. Lyons, 7 Gratt. 233; Perry v. Com., 3 Gratt. 632; Danville v. Pace, 25 Gratt. 1 (see *foot-note).*The principal case is cited as authority for the above proposition in Price v. Harrison, 31 Gratt. 121 (see *foot-note);*Crawford v. Halsted, 20 Gratt. 225 (see *foot-note).*

AIyI/E$N, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The act concerning appeals and writs of error and supersedeas, Code of Virginia, ch. 182, 3, p. 683, provides that no petition *93shall be presented for an appeal from or writ of error or supersedeas to a judgment of a County or Corporation court, when it is rendered on an appeal from a judgment of a justice; nor to a judgment, decree or order of any other Court, where the matter in controversy is merely pecuniary, and not of greater amount than two hundred dollars, exclusive of costs. The words are general, and as they merely apply to the remedy, they extend to and comprehend all petitions to this Court, or a Judge thereof in vacation, for an appeal, writ of error or supersedeas, whether the judgment, decree or order was prior to or after the 1st July 1850, when the new Code took effect. The 18th sec., ch. 16, p. 101, and 2d sec., ch. 216, p. 800, of the Code, providing that the repeal of previous acts should not affect any right established, accrued or accruing before *the 1st July 1850; or any prosecution, suit or proceeding pending on that day, do not operate so as to save to the party a remedy by way of appeal, writ of error or supersedeas, to this Court, allowed by previous acts, but taken away by the law now in force. The Court is therefore of opinion, that this Court has no jurisdiction to grant an appeal, writ of error or supersedeas to a judgment, decree or order rendered or made before the 1st July 1850, where the matter in controversy is merely pecuniar}', and not of greater amount than 200 dollars, exclusive of costs, unless the petition had been presented to the Court, or some Judge thereof in vacation, previous to that day.

Appeal refused.
Area: _________ Zone: _________ Unit: _________

Address: _________________________________________

Date: _______________________

Asian Longhorned Beetle (ALB) 

Eradication Program

We recently visited your property and would like to inform you 

of the following:

q Ground Survey/Tree Climbers have completed a survey

of your property and have NOT found signs of the ALB;

however, future surveys will be required.

q Ground Survey/Tree Climbers have completed a survey

of your property and have found a POSITIVE tree(s) on

your property.

q Ground Survey/Tree Climbers have completed a survey

of your property and have found a SUSPICIOUS tree(s)

on your property. Your tree(s) will be rechecked in the

near future. 

q We will begin the removal of infested trees on your

property between __________ (date) and __________

(date). The restoration of your property will be conducted 

after removals, but may be delayed due to weather and/or

soil conditions. Property restoration includes the grinding 

or herbicide treatment of the infested tree’s stump followed

by returning the property to grade, seeding landscape areas,

and repairing damage to properties caused by removal

operations. 

q We wish to contact you for the following reasons.

Please call our office.

Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any 

questions, please call the ALB program office at 

513-381-7180 or 1-866-702-9938.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity 

provider and employer.

United States Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Program Aid No. 2112

Issued April 2012
Asian Longhorned Beetle 

Ohio ALB Cooperative Eradication Program staff

from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal

and Plant Health Inspection Service and the Ohio

Department of Agriculture are currently surveying

Asian longhorned beetle (ALB) host trees on this

property for signs of infestation.

We also need your help to stop the spread of this

tree-killing, invasive pest. One of the most common

ways ALB and other exotic pests can spread into

new areas is by people unintentionally moving

infested plant materials. To prevent this from

happening, please do not move firewood or ALB

host material, such as cut wood, stumps, or host

trees, from the infested areas. 

If you have questions about ALB control and eradication efforts, or if you see beetles or other signs

of ALB infestation, please call the program office at

513-381-7180 or 1-866-702-9938.

For more information about ALB, go to: 

www.beetlebusters.info 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity

provider and employer.

United States Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

SURVEY IN 

PROGRESS
**EXHIBIT 32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Analysts International Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Michael J. LaVelle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David J. Steichen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
  Dated: August 11, 2004
By:
/s/ Michael J. LaVelleMichael J. LaVelleChief Executive OfficerDated: August 11, 2004
By:
/s/ David J. SteichenDavid J. SteichenChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4193 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4193

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 20 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

   Received; read twice an referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the building located at 100 Vester Gade, in Cruz Bay, 
 Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, for the period of time during which it 
     houses operations of the United States Postal Service, as the 
                   ``Ubaldina Simmons Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building located at 100 Vester Gade, in Cruz Bay, Saint Thomas, 
Virgin Islands, shall, for the period
of time during which it houses operations of the United States Postal 
Service, be known and designated as the ``Ubaldina Simmons Post 
Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall, with respect to the period referred to in section 1, be deemed 
to be a reference to the Ubaldina Simmons Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4397

To permit refunding of certain bonds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1994

Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To permit refunding of certain bonds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REFUNDING OF CERTAIN BONDS PERMITTED.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by section

5 10632 of the Revenue Act of 1987 (Public Law 100–203)

6 shall not apply to any bond the proceeds of which are used

7 exclusively to refund (including advance refund) a bond

8 that was part of the $31,750,000 issue of Special Obliga9 tion Revenue Bonds Series 1986 issued by a recognized

10 tribe of Indians between September 24, 1986 and Septem11 ber 26, 1986, (or to a bond that is part of a series of

12 refundings of such bond); provided if—
2

•HR 4397 IH

1 (1) the amount of the refunding bond does not

2 exceed the amount necessary to retire the refunded

3 bond; and

4 (2) the average maturity of the issue of which

5 the refunding bond is a part does not exceed the av6 erage maturity of the original issue.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply to

8 bonds issued after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Lawrence A. Sala,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lawrence A. Sala
-------------------------------------
Lawrence A. Sala
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 8, 2009

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren,  Inc. and will be retained by Anaren,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       34
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements of Lumenis Ltd. (formerly ESC Medical
Systems Ltd.) on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-6110, 333-8056 and 333-9256) and on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-6774, 333-40600 and 333-65696) of our report dated
February 18, 2003 (March 26, 2003 as for the approval of a voluntary stock
option exchange program mentioned in note 14B), relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Lumenis Ltd. which appears in this Form 10-K.

Brightman Almagor & Co.
Certified Public Accountants
A member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Tel Aviv, Israel
March 28, 2003
46757.

#### SHAPIRO v. SHAPIRO.

(383 SE2d 134)

Bell, Justice.

We granted an application to appeal in this case to determine whether periodic cohabitation is a sufficient ground to terminate alimony under the live-in lover statute, OCGA § 19-6-19 (b). Because the record reveals no evidence that the appellee and her “live-in lover” dwelled together continuously, we conclude that the trial court *406did not err in granting summary judgment to the appellee. *Reiter v. Reiter,*258 Ga. 101 (365 SE2d 826) (1988); *Daniels v. Daniels,*258 Ga. 791 (374 SE2d 735) (1989).

Decided September 11, 1989.

*Davis, Matthews & Quigley, Baxter L. Davis, Richard W. Schiffman, Jr.,*for appellant.

*C. Wilbur Warner, Jr., John C. Mayoue,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur. Weltner, J., disqualified.*
§ 13.201 Qualifying for a commercial operator license or endorsement. ( a ) To be qualified to hold any commercial radio operator license, an applicant must have a satisfactory knowledge of FCC rules and must have the ability to send correctly and receive correctly spoken messages in the English language.
( b ) An applicant must pass an examination for the issuance of a new commercial radio operator license, other than the Restricted Radiotelephone Operator Permit and the Restricted Radiotelephone Operator Permit-Limited Use, and for each change in operator class. An applicant must pass an examination for the issuance of a new Ship Radar Endorsement. Each application for the class of license or endorsement specified below must pass, or otherwise receive credit for, the corresponding examination elements: ( 1 ) Radiotelegraph Operator License. ( i ) Telegraphy Elements 1 and 2;
( ii ) Written Elements 1 and 6.
( 2 ) General Radiotelephone Operator License: Written Elements 1 and 3.
( 3 ) Marine Radio Operator Permit: Written Element 1.
( 4 ) GMDSS Radio Operator's License: Written Elements 1 and 7, or a Proof of Passing Certificate (PPC) issued by the United States Coast Guard or its designee representing a certificate of competency from a Coast Guard-approved training course for a GMDSS endorsement.
( 5 ) Restricted GMDSS Radio Operator License: Written Elements 1 and 7R, or a Proof of Passing Certificate (PPC) issued by the United States Coast Guard or its designee representing a certificate of competency from a Coast Guard-approved training course for a GMDSS endorsement.
( 6 ) GMDSS Radio Maintainer's License: Written Elements 1, 3, and 9.
( 7 ) Ship Radar Endorsement: Written Element 8.
[58 FR 9124, Feb. 19, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 3795, Jan. 27, 1994; 68 FR 46959, Aug. 7, 2003; 78 FR 23154, Apr. 18, 2013]
Wntteb �tates <lCourt of §ppeals 

for tbe jf eberal <lCtrcutt 

UNDER SEAL (NON-PUBLIC ORDER) 

IN RE COMPLAINT NO. 23-90015 

Before the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit 

PERCURIAM. 

ORDER 

Judge Newman has requested an extension of time to 

submit her written response to the Judicial Council pursuant to Rule 20(a) (first sentence) of the Rules for JudicialConduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings. The Judicial 

Council grants Judge Newman a 10-day extension to file 

her response which is now due at 9:00 am on August 31, 

2023. That filing must also include any written argument 

Judge Newman wishes to present to the Judicial Council 

pursuant to Rule 20(a) (second sentence). If the Judicial 

Council determines that oral argument is necessary after 

receiving Judge Newman's submission, it will notify Judge 

Newman. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Judge Newman may file her written response no later 

than 9:00 am on August 31, 2023. 

SO ORDERED: August 7, 2023.
#### § 61-300.99 What is the OMB control number for this part?

Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.,* and its implementing regulations at 5 CFR part 1320, the Office of Management and Budget has assigned Control No. 1293-0005 to the information collection requirements of this part.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E-LOAN, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Christian
A. Larsen, as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company,
and Matthew Roberts, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Christian A. Larsen Christian A. Larsen
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

August 13, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to E-LOAN, Inc. and will be retained by E-LOAN, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
"
Docket No: FAA-2009-0330 DirectorateID: 2008-NE-43-AD Disposition Comments
Originating Office Tracking No.: SP2856EN-E Next Step: [gJ FRAN 0SNPRM 

## D These comments are in response to an SNPRM

[SJ No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received- 

## If this box is checked, no signatures are required. Yes Has the referenced service information beenrevised since the NPRM was issued? Ifyes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyondthe scope of thepreviously publishedNP RMwill require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focalpoint for guidance. EASArecently issued a revised MCAI on February 3, 2012 to include a credit for inspections performedperthe prior revision ofthe Turbomeca Service Bulletin. FRwill be updated to include the following "Credit for Previous Action" paragraph: Credit for Previous Action 

### An inspection performed on an installed engine before the effective date ofthis AD using Turbomeca MSB No. 319 75 4810, Issue A, dated May 14,2008, satisfies the inspection requirement inparagraph (e)(l)(i) ofthis AD. FR will also be revised to reference the latest EASA AD 2011-0182R1, dated February 3, 2012 Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide yourrecommendedresolution of each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be**dis~ussed** together. Do not list all ofthe issues from one commenter together. Ifchanges to the AD are requiredbased on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter9. ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

## If

other, explain: Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? Do we agree? IfYES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: IfNO, we don't agree because
ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

## If

other, explain: Commenter(s): Page 1 of3
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1801 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (section 504) to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
No. 92-8143.

#### Adekunle *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: 21-1166: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
August 12, 2014

NYSERDA

17 Columbia Circle

Albany, NY 12203-6399

To Whom It May Concern:

Thank you for launching the Renewable Heat NY Program; it will certainly raise interest in renewable energy 

technologies within your state.

Attached please find the information required for consideration for pre-qualification of wood pellet boiler 

technology for inclusion in your programs. This information includes test results for three boiler sizes of 

ÖkoFEN/MESys boilers from Francisco Josephinum laboratories in Wieselburg, Austria. These tests were 

conducted based on EN 303-5 standards. 

Following is a table of required efficiency and emissions characteristics of the three models of ÖkoFEN/MESys 

boilers available to the New York marketplace:

All testing was accomplished by Francisco Josephinum Laboratory in Wieselburg, Austria, using EN 303-5 

standards. Efficiency and emissions figures have been appropriately modified.

Also included is a copy of the Maine Energy Systems warrantee covering the equipment being submitted for 

consideration.

Thank you for your consideration. We’ll look forward to your response to our request.

Respectfully,

Harry “Dutch” Dresser, Managing Director

dutch@maineenergysystems.com

CHEAPER. CLEANER. CLOSER.

PO Box 547

Bethel, Maine 04217

(207) 824-NRGY (6749)

MaineEnergySystems.com

Boiler KW BTU/hr Efficiency HHV (%) PM 2.5 (lb/MMBTU) CO @ 7% O2 (ppm)

Requirements >=85 <0.080 <270

ÖkoFEN PE16 16 55,000 86 0.023 140

ÖkoFEN PE32 32 110,000 85 0.019 41

ÖkoFEN PE64 64 220,000 87 0.021 80