```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4460 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4460

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 3 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

            October 4 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

  Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To provide for conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 1994''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definitions.
                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
Sec. 102. Project modifications.
Sec. 103. Small flood control projects.
Sec. 104. Small bank stabilization projects.
Sec. 105. Small navigation projects.
Sec. 106. Small shoreline protection projects.
Sec. 107. Small bank stabilization and beach erosion control project, 
                            Watson Island Park, Miami, Florida.
Sec. 108. Small snagging and sediment removal project, Mississippi 
                            River, Little Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 109. Upper Truckee River, El Dorado County, California.
Sec. 110. Muskingum River, Ohio.
Sec. 111. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 112. Continuation of authorization of certain projects.
Sec. 113. Reuse of waste water.
Sec. 114. Studies.
Sec. 115. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 116. Namings.
               TITLE II--GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS

Sec. 201. Recreation policy and user fees.
Sec. 202. Recovery of costs.
Sec. 203. Cost sharing of environmental projects.
Sec. 204. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
                            interests.
Sec. 205. Collaborative research and development.
Sec. 206. National inventory of dams.
Sec. 207. Maintenance, rehabilitation, and modernization of facilities.
Sec. 208. Federal lump-sum payments for Federal operation and 
                            maintenance costs.
Sec. 209. Long-term sediment management strategies.
Sec. 210. Emergency response.
Sec. 211. Obstruction removal requirement.
Sec. 212. Small project authorizations.
Sec. 213. Aquatic plant control.
Sec. 214. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
Sec. 215. Sediments decontamination technology.
Sec. 216. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 217. Foreign travel.
Sec. 218. Support of Army civil works program.
Sec. 219. Hopper dredge fleet.
Sec. 220. Restoration of environmental quality.
Sec. 221. Cost sharing for creation of dredged material disposal areas.
Sec. 222. Loss of life prevention.
Sec. 223. Sense of Congress; requirement regarding notice.
Sec. 224. Reservoir Management Technical Advisory Committee.
Sec. 225. Technical corrections.
                  TITLE III--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
Sec. 302. Lakes program.
Sec. 303. Environmental infrastructure.
Sec. 304. Environmental dredging.
Sec. 305. Chesapeake Bay restoration and protection program.
Sec. 306. Saint Lawrence Seaway collection of tolls.
Sec. 307. River basin plan for lower Mississippi.
Sec. 308. Extension of jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission.
Sec. 309. Great Lakes dredged material testing and evaluation manual.
Sec. 310. Great Lakes sediment reduction.
Sec. 311. Confined disposal facilities.
Sec. 312. Alternative to annual passes.
Sec. 313. Recreation partnership initiative.
Sec. 314. Water quality projects.
Sec. 315. New England Division headquarters facility.
Sec. 316. Quarantine facility.
Sec. 317. Benton and Washington Counties, Arkansas.
Sec. 318. Calaveras County, California.
Sec. 319. Lake Elsinore, California.
Sec. 320. Beneficial use of dredged material, Montezuma, California.
Sec. 321. Prado Dam safety improvements.
Sec. 322. San Jose, California.
Sec. 323. Tampa, Florida.
Sec. 324. Kankakee River Basin, Illinois.
Sec. 325. Watershed management plan for Deep River Basin, Indiana.
Sec. 326. Restoration projects for Maryland, West Virginia, and 
                            Kentucky.
Sec. 327. Beneficial use of dredged material, Poplar Island, Maryland.
Sec. 328. Erosion control measures, Smith Island, Maryland.
Sec. 329. Beneficial use of dredged material, Worton Point, Kent 
                            County, Maryland.
Sec. 330. Massachusetts coastal saltmarsh restoration authorization.
Sec. 331. Boston, Massachusetts, alternative technology project.
Sec. 332. Lake St. Claire, Michigan.
Sec. 333. Duluth, Minnesota.
Sec. 334. St. John's Bayou--New Madrid Floodway.
Sec. 335. Durham, New Hampshire.
Sec. 336. New York Bight and Harbor study.
Sec. 337. New York State canal system.
Sec. 338. New York City watershed.
Sec. 339. Northeastern Ohio.
Sec. 340. Ohio River.
Sec. 341. Removal or remediation of contaminated sediments, Mahoning 
                            River, Ohio and Pennsylvania.
Sec. 342. Columbia River Basin, Oregon.
Sec. 343. South central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 344. Broad top region of Pennsylvania.
Sec. 345. Hopper dredge McFarland.
Sec. 346. Seven Points Visitors Center, Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 347. Blackstone River Valley, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts.
Sec. 348. Earthquake Preparedness Center of Expertise extension.
Sec. 349. Murfreesboro, Tennessee.
Sec. 350. Repeal of termination date for construction of Virgin Islands 
                            projects by the Secretary.
Sec. 351. Huntington, West Virginia.
Sec. 352. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 353. Removal or remediation of contaminated sediments, Lower Fox 
                            River, Wisconsin.
Sec. 354. Savings clause.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the 
Secretary of the Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Except as provided in this section, the following projects for 
water resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended 
in the respective reports designated in this section:
            (1) Santa barbara harbor, california.--The project for 
        navigation, Santa Barbara Harbor, California: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated April 26, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $5,530,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,420,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $1,110,000.
            (2) San lorenzo river, santa cruz, california.--The project 
        for flood control, San Lorenzo River, Santa Cruz, California: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a 
        total cost of $15,670,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $7,910,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,760,000.
            (3) Marin county shoreline, san rafael, california.--The 
        project for storm damage reduction, Marin County shoreline, San 
        Rafael, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
        January 28, 1994, at a total cost of $26,300,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $17,100,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $9,200,000.
            (4) Anacostia river and tributaries, district of columbia 
        and maryland.--The project for environmental restoration, 
        Anacostia River and Tributaries, District of Columbia and 
        Maryland: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated October 1994, 
        at a total cost of $18,820,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
        of $14,120,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,700,000.
            (5) Atlantic intracoastal waterway, st. johns county, 
        florida.--The project for navigation, Atlantic intracoastal 
        waterway, St. Johns County, Florida: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total Federal cost of 
        $15,083,000. Operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and 
        rehabilitation shall be a local responsibility and the local 
        interest must assume ownership of the bridge.
            (6) Lake michigan, illinois.--The project for storm damage 
        reduction and shoreline erosion protection, Lake Michigan, 
        Illinois, from Wilmette, Illinois, to the Illinois-Indiana 
        State line: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 14, 
        1994, at a total cost of $192,251,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $104,435,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $87,816,000. The project shall include the breakwater near 
        the South Water Filtration Plant described in the report as a 
        separate element of the project, at a total cost of $8,169,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $5,310,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $2,859,000.
            (7) White river, indianapolis, indiana.--The project for 
        flood control and recreation, White River, Indianapolis, 
        Indiana, at a total cost of $52,700,000, with an estimated 
        first Federal cost of $32,425,000 and an estimated first non-
        Federal cost of $20,275,000, is authorized to be prosecuted by 
        the Secretary in accordance with a final report of the Chief of 
        Engineers and with such modifications as are recommended by the 
        Secretary. No construction on the project may be initiated 
        until such a report of the Chief of Engineers is issued and 
        approved by the Secretary.
            (8) Kentucky lock and dam, tennessee river, kentucky.--The 
        project for navigation, Kentucky Lock and Dam, Tennessee River, 
        Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 4, 1992, 
        at a total cost of $490,000,000. The costs of construction of 
        the project are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from 
        the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts 
        appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (9) Pond creek, jefferson county, kentucky.--The project 
        for flood control, Pond Creek, Jefferson County, Kentucky: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 28, 1994, at a 
        total cost of $16,374,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $11,039,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,335,000.
            (10) Wolf creek dam and lake cumberland, kentucky.--The 
        project for hydropower, Wolf Creek Dam and Lake Cumberland, 
        Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 28, 
        1994, at a total cost of $49,200,000, with an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $49,200,000. Funds derived by the Tennessee 
        Valley Authority from its power program and funds derived from 
        any private or public entity designated by the Southeastern 
        Power Administration may be used for all or part of any cost 
        sharing requirements for the project.
            (11) Port fourchon, lafourche parish, louisiana.--A project 
        for navigation, Belle Pass and Bayou Lafourche, Louisiana: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated December 1994, at a 
        total cost of $3,313,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $2,211,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,102,000.
            (12) Wood river, grand island, nebraska.--The project for 
        flood control, Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers, dated May 3, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $10,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,100,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,100,000.
            (13) Wilmington harbor, cape fear river, north carolina.--
        The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor, Cape Fear and 
        Northeast Cape Fear Rivers, North Carolina: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $22,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $14,700,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,300,000.
            (14) Duck creek, cincinnati, ohio.--The project for flood 
        control, Duck Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated July 28, 1994, at a total cost of $14,817,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $11,113,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $3,704,000.
            (15) Coos bay, oregon.--The project for deep draft 
        navigation, Coos Bay, Oregon: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of $13,700,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $8,800,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $4,900,000.
            (16) Rio grande de arecibo, puerto rico.--The project for 
        flood control, Rio Grande de Arecibo, Puerto Rico: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers, dated April 5, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $18,857,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,913,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,944,000.
            (17) Big sioux river and skunk creek, sioux falls, south 
        dakota.--The project for flood control, Big Sioux River and 
        Skunk Creek, Sioux Falls, South Dakota: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of $30,700,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $22,900,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $7,800,000.
            (18) Watertown, south dakota.--The project for flood 
        control, Watertown and Vicinity, South Dakota: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated August 31, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $16,092,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,835,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,257,000.
            (19) Atlantic intracoastal waterway, chesapeake, 
        virginia.--The project for navigation, Atlantic intracoastal 
        waterway, Great Bridge, Chesapeake, Virginia: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated July 1, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $23,007,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $19,771,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,236,000.
            (20) Marmet lock, kanawha river, west virginia.--The 
        project for navigation, Marmet Lock, Kanawha River, West 
        Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 
        1994, at a total cost of $261,000,000. The costs of 
        construction of the project are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
        appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ 
        from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
        In conducting any real estate acquisition activities, the 
        Secretary shall give priority consideration to those 
        individuals who would be directly affected by any physical 
        displacement due to project design and shall consider the 
        financial circumstances of such individuals. The Secretary 
        shall proceed with real estate acquisition in connection with 
        the project expeditiously.

SEC. 102. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.

    (a) Nogales Wash and Tributaries, Arizona.--The project for flood 
control, Nogales Wash and tributaries, Arizona, authorized by section 
101(a)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 
4606), is modified to direct the Secretary to permit the non-Federal 
contribution for the project to be determined in accordance with 
sections 103(k) and 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 and to direct the Secretary to enter into negotiations with non-
Federal interests pursuant to section 103(l) of such Act concerning the 
timing of the initial payment of the non-Federal contribution.
    (b) Oakland Inner Harbor, California.--The project for deep-draft 
navigation, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $57,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $35,900,000, and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $21,100,000.
    (c) Potomac River, Washington, District of Columbia.--The project 
for flood protection, Potomac River, Washington, District of Columbia, 
authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (74 
Stat. 1574), is modified to provide for completion of the project 
substantially in accordance with the General Design Memorandum dated 
May 1992, the General Design Memorandum Supplement dated May 1994, and 
a letter report dated August 9, 1994, at a Federal cost of $1,800,000.
    (d) Central and Southern Florida, Canal 51 (C-51).--The project for 
flood protection of West Palm Beach, Florida (C-51), authorized by 
section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1183), is 
modified to provide for the construction of an enlarged stormwater 
detention area, Storm Water Treatment Area 1 East, generally in 
accordance with the plan of improvements described in the February 15, 
1994, report entitled ``Everglades Protection Project, Palm Beach 
County, Florida, Conceptual Design'', with such modifications as are 
approved by the Secretary. The additional work authorized by this 
subsection shall be accomplished at Federal expense. Operation and 
maintenance of the stormwater detention area shall be consistent with 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary for the Central and Southern 
Florida project, and all costs of such operation and maintenance shall 
be provided by non-Federal interests.
    (e) Central and Southern Florida, Canal 111 (C-111).--
            (1) In general.--The project for Central and Southern 
        Florida, authorized by the Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, 
        and modified by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 
        (82 Stat. 740-741), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
        implement the recommended plan of improvement contained in a 
        report entitled ``Central and Southern Florida Project, Final 
        Integrated General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact 
        Statement, Canal 111 (C-111), South Dade County, Florida'', 
        dated May 1994, including acquisition of such portions of the 
        Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project.
            (2) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost 
                of implementing the plan of improvement shall be 50 
                percent.
                    (B) Department of interior responsibility.--The 
                Department of the Interior shall pay 25 percent of the 
                cost of acquiring such portions of the Frog Pond and 
                Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project. The 
                amount paid by the Department of the Interior shall be 
                included as part of the Federal share of the cost of 
                implementing the plan.
                    (C) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs of the 
                improvements undertaken pursuant to this subsection 
                shall be 100 percent; except that the Federal 
                Government shall reimburse the non-Federal project 
                sponsor 60 percent of the costs of operating and 
                maintaining pump stations that pump water into Taylor 
                Slough in the Everglades National Park.
    (f) Tybee Island, Georgia.--The project for beach erosion control, 
Tybee Island, Georgia, authorized pursuant to section 201 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5), is modified to include as part 
of the project the portion of the ocean shore of Tybee Island located 
south of the extension of 9th Street.
    (g) Chicago, Illinois.--The project for flood control, Chicagoland 
Underflow Plan, Illinois, authorized by section 3(a)(5) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to 
limit the capacity of the reservoir project not to exceed 
11,000,000,000 gallons or 32,000 acre-feet, to provide that the 
reservoir project may not be located north of 55th Street or west of 
East Avenue in the vicinity of McCook, Illinois, and to provide that 
the reservoir project may only be constructed on the basis of a 
specific plan that has been evaluated by the Secretary under the 
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
    (h) North Branch of Chicago River, Illinois.--The project for flood 
protection, North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, authorized by 
section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4115), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the 
project in accordance with the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
March 1994, at a total cost of $34,800,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $20,774,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,026,000.
    (i) Rend Lake, Illinois.--The project for flood control, Rend Lake, 
Illinois, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1189), is modified to direct the Secretary to correct the 
design deficiency in the Rend Lake Subimpoundment, Benton, Jefferson 
County, Illinois, at full Federal expense, with an estimated cost of 
$5,300,000.
    (j) Arkansas City, Kansas.--The project for flood control, Arkansas 
City, Kansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4116), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $35,700,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $26,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $9,100,000.
    (k) Halstead, Kansas.--The project for flood control, Halstead, 
Kansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4116), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
carry out the project in accordance with the Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated March 19, 1993, at a total cost of $11,100,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $8,325,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $2,775,000.
    (l) Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland 
River, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia.--The project for flood 
control, Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland 
River, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia, authorized by section 
202(a) of the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 
Stat. 1339), is modified to provide that the minimum level of flood 
protection to be afforded by the project shall be the level required to 
provide protection from a 100-year flood or from the flood of April 
1977, whichever level of protection is greater.
    (m) West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, 
Louisiana.--The project for hurricane protection, West Bank Hurricane 
Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, authorized by section 
401(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4128), 
is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project in 
accordance with the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated November 
1994, at a total cost of $119,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $77,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $41,900,000.
    (n) Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, Louisiana.--The project for 
navigation, Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, Louisiana, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), is 
modified to provide for the extension of the 16-foot deep by 250-foot 
wide Baptiste Collette Bayou entrance channel to approximately Mile 8 
of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet navigation channel, at a total 
estimated Federal cost of $80,000.
    (o) Bonneville Lock and Dam, Columbia River, Oregon and 
Washington.--
            (1) In general.--The project for Bonneville Lock and Dam, 
        Columbia River, Oregon and Washington, authorized by the Act of 
        August 20, 1937 (50 Stat. 731), and modified by section 83 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 35), is 
        further modified to authorize the Secretary to convey to the 
        city of North Bonneville, Washington, at no further cost to the 
        city, all right, title and interest of the United States in and 
        to the following:
                    (A) Any municipal facilities, utilities fixtures, 
                and equipment for the relocated city, and any remaining 
                lands designated as open spaces or municipal lots not 
                previously conveyed to the city, specifically, Lots M1 
                through M15, M16 (the ``community center lot''), M18, 
                M19, M22, M24, S42 through S45, and S52 through S60.
                    (B) The ``school lot'' described as Lot 2, block 5, 
                on the plat of relocated North Bonneville.
                    (C) Parcels 2 and C, but only upon the completion 
                of any environmental response actions required under 
                applicable law.
                    (D) That portion of Parcel B lying south of the 
                existing city boundary, west of the sewage treatment 
                plant, and north of the drainage ditch that is located 
                adjacent to the northerly limit of the Hamilton Island 
                landfill, provided the Secretary determines, at the 
                time of the proposed conveyance, that the Army has 
                taken all action necessary to protect human health and 
                the environment.
                    (E) Such portions of Parcel H which can be conveyed 
                without a requirement for further investigation, 
                inventory or other action by the Department of the Army 
                under the provisions of the National Historic 
                Preservation Act.
                    (F) Such easements as the Secretary deems necessary 
                for--
                            (i) sewer and water line crossings of 
                        relocated Washington State Highway 14; and
                            (ii) reasonable public access to the 
                        Columbia River across those portions of 
                        Hamilton Island that remain under the ownership 
                        of the United States.
            (2) Time period for conveyances.--The conveyances referred 
        to in paragraphs (1)(A), (1)(B), (1)(E), and (1)(F)(i) shall be 
        completed within 180 days after the United States receives the 
        release referred to in paragraph (4). All other conveyances 
        shall be completed expeditiously, subject to any conditions 
        specified in the applicable subsection.
            (3) Purpose.--The purpose of the conveyances authorized by 
        paragraph (1) is to resolve all outstanding issues between the 
        United States and the city of North Bonneville.
            (4) Acknowledgement of payment; release of claims relating 
        to relocation of city.--As a prerequisite to such conveyances, 
        the city of North Bonneville shall execute an acknowledgement 
        of payment of just compensation and shall execute a release of 
        any and all claims for relief of any kind against the United 
        States growing out of the relocation of the city of North 
        Bonneville, or any prior Federal legislation relating thereto, 
        and shall dismiss, with prejudice, any pending litigation, if 
        any, involving such matters.
            (5) Release by attorney general.--Upon receipt of the 
        city's acknowledgment and release referred to in paragraph (4), 
        the Attorney General of the United States shall dismiss any 
        pending litigation, if any, arising out of the relocation of 
        the city of North Bonneville, and execute a release of any and 
        all rights to damages of any kind under the February 20, 1987, 
        judgment of the United States Claims Court, including any 
        interest thereon.
            (6) Acknowledgment of entitlements; release by city of 
        claims under this subsection.--Within 60 days after the 
        conveyances authorized by paragraph (1) (other than 
        subparagraph (F)(ii)) have been completed, the city shall 
        execute an acknowledgement that all entitlements under such 
        paragraph have been completed and shall execute a release of 
        any and all claims for relief of any kind against the United 
        States arising out of this subsection.
            (7) Effects on city.--Beginning on the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, the city of North Bonneville, or any 
        successor in interest thereto, shall--
                    (A) be precluded from exercising any jurisdiction 
                over any lands owned in whole or in part by the United 
                States and administered by the United States Army Corps 
                of Engineers in connection with the Bonneville project; 
                and
                    (B) be authorized to change the zoning designations 
                of, sell, or resell Parcels S35 and S56, which are 
                presently designated as open spaces.
    (p) Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.--The project 
for navigation, Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 
731), is modified to provide that alteration of the drawspan of the 
Brightman Street Bridge to provide a channel width of 300 feet shall 
not be required after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (q) Manistique Harbor, Schoolcraft County, Michigan.--The project 
for navigation, Manistique Harbor, Schoolcraft County, Michigan, 
authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act of March 3, 
1905 (33 Stat. 1136), is modified to provide for an authorized project 
depth of 12 feet.
    (r) Saginaw River, Michigan.--The project for flood protection, 
Saginaw River, Michigan, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 311) is modified to include as part of the 
project the design and construction of an inflatable dam on the Flint 
River, Michigan, at a total cost of $800,000.
    (s) Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan.--
            (1) In general.--The project for navigation, Sault Sainte 
        Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan, authorized by section 1149 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254-
        4255), is modified as provided by this subsection.
            (2) Payment of non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of 
        the cost of the project referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 
        paid as follows:
                    (A) That portion of the non-Federal share which the 
                Secretary determines is attributable to use of the lock 
                by vessels calling at Canadian ports shall be paid by 
                the United States.
                    (B) The remaining portion of the non-Federal share 
                shall be paid by the Great Lakes States pursuant to an 
                agreement entered into by such States.
            (3) Payment term of additional percentage.--The amount to 
        be paid by non-Federal interests pursuant to section 101(a) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)) 
        and this subsection with respect to the project referred to in 
        paragraph (1) may be paid over a period of 50 years or the 
        expected life of the project, whichever is shorter.
            (4) Great lakes states defined.--For the purposes of this 
        subsection, the term ``Great Lakes States'' means the States of 
        Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, 
        Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
    (t) New Madrid Harbor, Missouri.--The project for navigation, New 
Madrid Harbor, Missouri, authorized pursuant to section 107 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and modified by section 
102(n) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4807), 
is further modified to direct the Secretary to assume responsibility 
for maintenance of the existing Federal channel referred to in such 
section 102(n) in addition to maintaining New Madrid County Harbor.
    (u) Cape Girardeau, Missouri.--The project for flood control, Cape 
Girardeau, Jackson Metropolitan Area, Missouri, authorized by section 
401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4118-
4119), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project, 
including implementation of nonstructural measures, at a total cost of 
$44,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $32,300,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $11,900,000.
    (v) Jones Inlet, New York.--The project for navigation, Jones 
Inlet, New York, authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act 
of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 13), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
place uncontaminated dredged material on beach areas downdrift from the 
federally maintained channel for the purpose of mitigating the 
interruption of littoral system natural processes caused by the jetty 
and continued dredging of the federally maintained channel.
    (w) Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers, New Jersey and New York.--The project 
for flood control, Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers, New Jersey and New York, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4120), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry 
out the project in accordance with the Report of the Chief of Engineers 
dated May 1994, at a total cost of $10,800,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $8,120,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$2,680,000.
    (x) Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape Fear River, North Carolina.--
The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape Fear 
River, North Carolina, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4095), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project substantially in 
accordance with the General Design Memorandum dated April 1990 and the 
General Design Memorandum Supplement dated February 1994, at a total 
cost of $43,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $20,100,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,800,000.
    (y) Garrison Dam, North Dakota.--The project for flood control, 
Garrison Dam, North Dakota, authorized by section 9 of the Flood 
Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 891), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to acquire permanent flowage and saturation 
easements over the lands in Williams County, North Dakota, extending 
from the riverward margin of the Buford-Trenton Irrigation District 
main canal to the north bank of the Missouri River, beginning at the 
Buford-Trenton Irrigation District pumping station located in the 
northeast quarter of section 17, township 152 north, range 104 west, 
and continuing northeasterly downstream to the land referred to as the 
East Bottom, and any other lands outside of the boundaries of the 
Buford-Trenton Irrigation District which have been adversely affected 
by rising ground water and surface flooding. Any easement acquired by 
the Secretary pursuant to this subsection shall include the right, 
power, and privilege of the Government to submerge, overflow, 
percolate, and saturate the surface and subsurface of the land. The 
cost of acquiring such easements shall not exceed 90 percent, or be 
less than 75 percent, of the unaffected fee value of the lands. The 
project is further modified to authorize the Secretary to provide a 
lump sum payment of $60,000 to the Buford-Trenton Irrigation District 
for power requirements associated with operation of the drainage pumps 
and to relinquish all right, title, and interest of the United States 
to the drainage pumps located within the boundaries of the Irrigation 
District.
    (z) Wister Lake, Oklahoma.--The flood control project for Wister 
Lake, LeFlore County, Oklahoma, authorized by section 4 of the Flood 
Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1218), is modified to increase 
the level of the conservation pool by 1 foot and to adjust the seasonal 
pool operation to accommodate the change in the conservation pool 
elevation.
    (aa) Saw Mill Run, Pennsylvania.--The project for flood control, 
Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project in 
accordance with the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 31, 
1994, at a total cost of $12,140,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$9,105,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,035,000.
    (bb) San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico.--The project for navigation, San 
Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4097), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to deepen the bar channel to depths varying 
from 49 feet to 56 feet below mean low water with other modifications 
to authorized interior channels as generally described in the General 
Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment, dated March 1994, at 
a total cost of $43,993,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$27,341,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $16,652,000.
    (cc) India Point Railroad Bridge, Seekonk River, Providence, Rhode 
Island.--The project for the removal and demolition of the India Point 
Railroad Bridge, Seekonk River, Providence, Rhode Island, authorized by 
section 1166(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4258), is modified to authorize the Secretary to demolish and 
remove the center span of the bridge, at a total cost of $1,300,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $650,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $650,000.
    (dd) Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas.--
            (1) In general.--The project for flood control, Dallas 
        Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas, authorized by section 301 of 
        the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1091), is modified 
        to provide that, notwithstanding the last sentence of 
        subsection (c) of section 104 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986, non-Federal interests may apply for 
        crediting under such section 104, against the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project, the cost of work performed by the 
        non-Federal interests in constructing flood protection works 
        for Rochester Park and the north section of the Central 
        Wastewater Treatment Plant.
            (2) Determination of amount.--The amount to be credited 
        under paragraph (1) shall be determined by the Secretary. In 
        determining such amount, the Secretary may permit crediting 
        only for that portion of the work performed by the non-Federal 
        interests which is compatible with the project referred to in 
        paragraph (1), including any modification thereof, and which is 
        required for construction of such project.
            (3) Cash contribution.--Nothing in this subsection shall be 
        construed to limit the applicability of the requirement 
        contained in section 103(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 to the project referred to in paragraph 
        (1).
    (ee) Little Dell Dam and Reservoir, Salt Lake City Streams, Utah.--
The project for flood control, Little Dell Dam and Reservoir, Salt Lake 
City Streams, Utah, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1968 (82 Stat. 744) and modified by section 170 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2936), is further modified 
to allocate the flood control and water supply costs in accordance with 
the percentages set forth in item 6h of table 16 of the Corps of 
Engineers Sacramento District Reexamination Report, dated February 
1984, and to provide that cost-sharing be in accordance with section 
103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
    (ff) Upper Jordan River, Utah.--The project for flood control, 
Upper Jordan River, Utah, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$12,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,000,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $4,100,000.
    (gg) Haysi Lake, Virginia.--The Haysi Lake, Virginia, feature of 
the project for flood control, Tug Fork of the Big Sandy River, 
Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia, authorized by section 202(a) of 
the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 
1339), is modified to add recreation as a project purpose.
    (hh) Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, Virginia.--The project for 
navigation and shoreline protection, Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, 
Virginia, authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to continue maintenance of the project for the life of the 
project. The Federal share of the cost of such maintenance shall be 
determined in accordance with title I of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986.
    (ii) Bluestone Lake, West Virginia.--Section 102(ff) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4810) is amended by 
inserting ``except for that organic matter necessary to maintain and 
enhance the biological resources of such waters,'' after ``project,'' 
the first place it appears.
    (jj) Kickapoo River, Wisconsin.--
            (1) In general.--The project for flood control and allied 
        purposes, Kickapoo River, Wisconsin, authorized by section 203 
        of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1190) and modified 
        by section 814 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (100 Stat. 4169), is further modified as provided by this 
        subsection.
            (2) Transfer of property.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to the requirements of 
                this subsection, the Secretary shall transfer to the 
                State of Wisconsin, without consideration, all right, 
                title, and interest of the United States to the lands 
                described in subparagraph (B), including all works, 
                structures, and other improvements to such lands.
                    (B) Land description.--The lands to be transferred 
                pursuant to subparagraph (A) are the approximately 
                8,569 acres of land associated with the LaFarge Dam and 
                Lake portion of the project referred to in paragraph 
                (1) in Vernon County, Wisconsin, in the following 
                sections:
                            (i) Section 31, Township 14 North, Range 1 
                        West of the 4th Principal Meridian.
                            (ii) Sections 2 through 11, and 16, 17, 20, 
                        and 21, Township 13 North, Range 2 West of the 
                        4th Principal Meridian.
                            (iii) Sections 15, 16, 21 through 24, 26, 
                        27, 31, and 33 through 36, Township 14 North, 
                        Range 2 West of the 4th Principal Meridian.
                    (C) Terms and conditions.--The transfer under 
                subparagraph (A) shall be made on the condition that 
                the State of Wisconsin enters into a written agreement 
                with the Secretary to hold the United States harmless 
                from all claims arising from or through the operation 
                of the lands and improvements subject to the transfer. 
                If title to the lands described in subparagraph (B) is 
                sold or transferred by the State, then the State shall 
                reimburse the United States for the price originally 
                paid by the United States for purchasing such lands.
                    (D) Deadlines.--Not later than July 1, 1995, the 
                Secretary shall transmit to the State of Wisconsin an 
                offer to make the transfer under this paragraph. Such 
                offer shall provide for the transfer to be made in the 
                period beginning on November 1, 1995, and ending on 
                December 31, 1995.
                    (E) Deauthorization.--The LaFarge Dam and Lake 
                portion of the project referred to in paragraph (1) is 
                not authorized after the date of the transfer under 
                this paragraph.
                    (F) Interim management and maintenance.--The 
                Secretary shall continue to manage and maintain the 
                LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of the project referred to 
                in paragraph (1) until the date of the transfer under 
                this subsection.
            (3) Completion of project features.--
                    (A) Requirement.--The Secretary shall undertake the 
                completion of the following features of the project 
                referred to in paragraph (1):
                            (i) The continued relocation of State 
                        highway route 131 and county highway routes P 
                        and F substantially in accordance with plans 
                        contained in Design Memorandum No. 6, 
                        Relocation-LaFarge Reservoir, dated June 1970; 
                        except that the relocation shall generally 
                        follow the existing road rights-of-way through 
                        the Kickapoo Valley.
                            (ii) Environmental cleanup and site 
                        restoration of abandoned wells, farm sites, and 
                        safety modifications to the water control 
                        structures.
                            (iii) Cultural resource activities to meet 
                        the requirements of Federal law.
                    (B) Participation by state of wisconsin.--In 
                undertaking the completion of the features described in 
                subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall determine the 
                requirements of the State of Wisconsin on the location 
                and design of each such feature.
            (4) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
        carry out this subsection for fiscal years beginning after 
        September 30, 1994, $17,000,000.

SEC. 103. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, 
shall carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
            (1) St. louis, missouri.--A project for flood control in 
        Carondelet and Germania neighborhoods in St. Louis, Missouri.
            (2) Fulmer creek, village of mohawk, new york.--A project 
        for flood control, Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York.
            (3) Moyer creek, village of frankfort, new york.--A project 
        for flood control, Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York.
            (4) Sauquoit creek, whitesboro, new york.--A project for 
        flood control, Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, New York.
            (5) Steele creek, village of ilion, new york.--A project 
        for flood control, Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York.
            (6) Sunbury, pennsylvania.--A project for flood control, 
        Susquehanna River, at Sunbury, Pennsylvania, to rehabilitate 
        existing flood control structures.

SEC. 104. SMALL BANK STABILIZATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, 
shall carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
            (1) Wabash river, new harmony, indiana.--A project for bank 
        stabilization to prevent further erosion of the east bank of 
        the Wabash River in the vicinity of New Harmony, Indiana.
            (2) Hickman bluff, hickman, kentucky.--A project for bank 
        stabilization, Hickman Bluff, Hickman, Kentucky.
            (3) Wickliffe, ballard county, kentucky.--A project for 
        bank stabilization, Wickliffe, Ballard County, Kentucky, on the 
        Mississippi River between the existing Wickliffe and Mayfield 
        revetments.
            (4) Allegheny river at oil city, pennsylvania.--A project 
        for bank stabilization to address erosion problems affecting 
        the pipeline crossing the Allegheny River at Oil City, 
        Pennsylvania, including measures to address erosion affecting 
        the pipeline in the bed of the Allegheny River and its adjacent 
        banks.

SEC. 105. SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, 
shall carry out the project under section 107 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
            (1) Akutan, alaska.--A navigation project for Akutan, 
        Alaska, consisting of a bulkhead and a wave barrier.
            (2) King cove, alaska.--A navigation project for King Cove, 
        Alaska, consisting of a small rubble mound structure and a 
        vertical wave screen.
            (3) Taconite, minnesota.--A navigation project for 
        Taconite, Minnesota.
            (4) Two harbors, minnesota.--A navigation project for Two 
        Harbors, Minnesota.
            (5) Brooklyn, new york.--A project for navigation, 
        Brooklyn, New York, including restoration of the pier and 
        related navigation support structures, at the Sixty-Ninth 
        Street Pier.

SEC. 106. SMALL SHORELINE PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    (a) Project Authorizations.--The Secretary shall conduct a study 
for each of the following projects, and if the Secretary determines 
that the project is feasible, shall carry out the project under section 
3 of the Shoreline Protection Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g):
            (1) Faulkner's island, connecticut.--A project for 
        shoreline protection, Faulkner's Island, Connecticut.
            (2) Sylvan beach breakwater, town of verona, oneida county, 
        new york.--A project for shoreline protection, Sylvan Beach 
        Breakwater, town of Verona, Oneida County, New York.
    (b) Cost Sharing Agreement.--In carrying out the project authorized 
by subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall enter into an agreement with 
the property owner of the project to determine allocation of the 
project costs.

SEC. 107. SMALL BANK STABILIZATION AND BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT, 
              WATSON ISLAND PARK, MIAMI, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for bank 
stabilization and beach erosion control, Watson Island Park, Miami, 
Florida, and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, 
shall carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r) and section 103 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1962 (33 U.S.C. 426g).

SEC. 108. SMALL SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL PROJECT, MISSISSIPPI 
              RIVER, LITTLE FALLS, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for snagging and 
sediment removal, Mississippi River, Little Falls, Minnesota, and, if 
the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, shall carry out 
the project under section 3 of the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 
1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a; 59 Stat. 23).

SEC. 109. UPPER TRUCKEE RIVER, EL DORADO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for environmental 
restoration, Upper Truckee River, El Dorado County, California, 
including measures for restoration of degraded wetlands and wildlife 
enhancement, and, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
feasible, shall carry out the project under section 1135 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a).

SEC. 110. MUSKINGUM RIVER, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying 
out a major rehabilitation project for the locks on the Muskingum 
River, Ohio, constructed under the National Industrial Recovery Act 
and, if the Secretary determines that project is feasible, carry out 
the project.

SEC. 111. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Arkansas.--The 
project for flood control, Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, 
Arkansas, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 
(64 Stat. 174) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(b)(1) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(1)), is 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.
    (b) White River, Arkansas.--The project for navigation, White River 
Navigation to Batesville, Arkansas, authorized by section 601(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4139) and 
deauthorized by section 52(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1988 (102 Stat. 4045), is authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary.

SEC. 112. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    (a) General Rule.--Notwithstanding section 1001 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a), the following 
projects shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary:
            (1) Ontonagon harbor, ontonagon county, michigan.--The 
        project for navigation, Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, 
        Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act 
        of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176).
            (2) Alpena harbor, michigan.--The project for navigation, 
        Alpena Harbor, Michigan, authorized by section 301 of the River 
        and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090).
            (3) Cedar river harbor, michigan.--The project for 
        navigation, Cedar River Harbor, Michigan, authorized by section 
        301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090).
            (4) Cross village harbor, michigan.--The project for 
        navigation, Cross Village Harbor, Michigan, authorized by 
        section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 
        1405).
            (5) Knife river harbor, minnesota.--The project for 
        navigation, Knife River Harbor, Minnesota, authorized by 
        section 100 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 
        Stat. 41).
    (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) shall not be 
authorized for construction after the last day of the 5-year period 
that begins on the date of the enactment of this Act unless, during 
such period, funds have been obligated for the construction (including 
planning and design) of the project.

SEC. 113. REUSE OF WASTE WATER.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to provide assistance 
to non-Federal interests for carrying out projects described in 
subsection (c) for the beneficial reuse of waste water. Such assistance 
may be in the form of technical, planning, design, and construction 
assistance. If the Secretary is to provide any design or engineering 
assistance to carry out a project under this section, the Secretary 
shall obtain by procurement from private sources all services necessary 
for the Secretary to provide such assistance, unless the Secretary 
finds that--
            (1) the service would require the use of a new technology 
        unavailable in the private sector; or
            (2) a solicitation or request for proposal has failed to 
        attract 2 or more bids or proposals.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of assistance 
provided under this section shall be 55 percent. The non-Federal share 
shall be subject to the ability of the non-Federal interest to pay, 
including the procedures and regulations relating to ability to pay 
established under section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986.
    (c) Project Descriptions.--The projects for which the Secretary is 
authorized to provide assistance under subsection (a) are as follows:
            (1) West dade regional reuse facility, florida.--The West 
        Dade Regional reuse facility, Florida, to increase water supply 
        to the Everglades National Park and associated natural systems.
            (2) Charlotte county, florida.--Charlotte County, Florida, 
        for aquifer storage and recovery of reclaimed water.
            (3) Alameda county, california.--Alameda County Phase I 
        waste water reclamation project serving the cities of Fremont, 
        Union City, and Newark, California.
            (4) Sunnyvale, california.--The city of Sunnyvale, 
        California, Phase II water reclamation project.
            (5) Palo alto, california.--The city of Palo Alto, Phase I 
        water reclamation project.
            (6) South bayside, california.--The South Bayside System 
        Authority for Phase I of the Redwood City-South Bayside System 
        Authority water reclamation program serving Redwood City, Menlo 
        Park, and San Carlos, California.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $39,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 114. STUDIES.

    (a) Gila River, Gillespie Dam to Yuma, Arizona.--The Secretary 
shall conduct a study of the feasibility of implementing water 
conservation measures at the Gila River, Gillespie Dam to Yuma, 
Arizona, including an evaluation of the reoperation of Painted Rock 
Reservoir as well as other structural and nonstructural features.
    (b) Nogales Wash and Tributaries, Arizona.--
            (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
        relationship of flooding in Nogales, Arizona, and floodflows 
        emanating from Mexico.
            (2) Report.--The Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
        report on the results of the study conducted under paragraph 
        (1), together with recommendations concerning the appropriate 
        level of non-Federal participation in the project for flood 
        control, Nogales Wash and tributaries, Arizona, authorized by 
        section 101(a)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1990 (104 Stat. 4606).
    (c) Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California.--The Secretary 
shall conduct a study of the advisability of modifying the project for 
flood control, Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, authorized 
pursuant to section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
701s), in order to provide for water conservation storage up to 1249 
feet mean sea level.
    (d) Santa Monica Breakwater, California.--The Secretary shall 
complete the feasibility study for the breakwater project, Santa 
Monica, California, and shall consider as commercial benefits for 
purposes of section 119 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 benefits 
from reestablishment of past charter fishing vessel accommodation 
activities which existed in the area prior to damage of the breakwater 
structure.
    (e) Yolo Bypass, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.--The 
Secretary shall study the advisability of acquiring land in the 
vicinity of the Yolo Bypass in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, 
California, for the purpose of environmental mitigation for the flood 
control project for Sacramento, California, and other water resources 
projects in the area.
    (f) Chicago Lock and Thomas J. O'Brien Lock, Illinois.--The 
Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of making 
such structural repairs as are necessary to prevent leakage through the 
Chicago Lock and the Thomas J. O'Brien Lock, Illinois, and to determine 
the need for installing permanent flow measurement equipment at such 
locks to measure any leakage.
    (g) Beauty Creek Watershed, Valparaiso City, Porter County, 
Indiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to assess the feasibility 
of implementing streambank erosion control measures and flood control 
measures within the Beauty Creek watershed, Valparaiso City, Porter 
County, Indiana.
    (h) Indiana Harbor Canal, East Chicago, Lake County, Indiana.--The 
Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of including 
environmental and recreational features, including a vegetation buffer, 
as part of the project for navigation, Indiana Harbor Canal, East 
Chicago, Lake County, Indiana, authorized by the Rivers and Harbors 
Appropriations Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 658).
    (i) Jeffersonville, Indiana.--
            (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
        feasibility of carrying out major rehabilitation of the levee 
        at Jeffersonville, Indiana, authorized pursuant to section 4 of 
        the Rivers and Harbors Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217).
            (2) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress 
        a report on the results of the study conducted under paragraph 
        (1).
    (j) Knight Township Levee, Evansville, Indiana.--
            (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
        feasibility of carrying out major rehabilitation of the Knight 
        Township levee at Evansville, Indiana, authorized pursuant to 
        section 4 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of June 28, 1938 (52 
        Stat. 1217).
            (2) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress 
        a report on the results of the study conducted under paragraph 
        (1).
    (k) Koontz Lake, Indiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of 
the feasibility of implementing measures to restore Koontz Lake, 
Indiana, including measures to remove silt, sediment, nutrients, 
aquatic growth, and other noxious materials from Koontz Lake, measures 
to improve public access facilities to Koontz Lake, and measures to 
prevent or abate the deposit of sediments and nutrients in Koontz Lake.
    (l) Little Calumet River, Indiana.--
            (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
        impact of the project for flood control, Little Calumet River, 
        Indiana, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4115), on flooding and water 
        quality in the vicinity of the Black Oak area of Gary, Indiana.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress 
        a report on the results of the study conducted under paragraph 
        (1), together with recommendations for cost-effective 
        remediation of impacts described in paragraph (1).
            (3) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
        study to be conducted under paragraph (1) shall be 100 percent.
    (m) Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
study of the economic, engineering, and environmental feasibility of 
providing additional water supply for Calcasieu Parish and vicinity in 
southwest Louisiana, with a view toward providing for future regional 
increases in municipal and industrial water demand and for increasing 
agricultural production.
    (n) Calcasieu Ship Channel, Hackberry, Louisiana.--The Secretary 
shall conduct a study to determine the need for improved navigation and 
related support service structures in the vicinity of the Calcasieu 
Ship Channel, Hackberry, Louisiana.
    (o) Crowley, Louisiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
feasibility of implementing measures for controlling erosion on Bayou 
Blanc immediately downstream from the Louisiana State Highway Route 13 
bridge crossing.
    (p) River Des Peres, Saint Louis County, Missouri.--In conducting 
the feasibility study of potential flood control measures for the River 
Des Peres, Saint Louis County, Missouri, the Secretary shall include 
potential storm water runoff and related improvements and shall 
cooperate with the Metropolitan Saint Louis Sewer District.
    (q) Port of New York-New Jersey.--
            (1) Study of measures to reduce sediment deposition.--The 
        Secretary shall conduct a study of measures that could be used 
        to reduce sediment deposition in the vicinity of the Port of 
        New York-New Jersey for the purpose of reducing the volumes to 
        be dredged for navigation projects in the Port.
            (2) Dredged material disposal study.--The Secretary shall 
        conduct a study to determine the feasibility of constructing 
        and operating an underwater confined dredged material disposal 
        site in the Port of New York-New Jersey which could accommodate 
        as much as 250,000 cubic yards of dredged materials for the 
        purpose of demonstrating the feasibility of underwater confined 
        disposal pit as an environmentally suitable method of 
        containing certain sediments.
            (3) Report.--The Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
        report on the results of the studies conducted under this 
        subsection, together with any recommendations of the Secretary 
        concerning reduction of sediment deposition referred to in 
        paragraph (1).
    (r) Maumee River, Ohio.--The Secretary shall study the feasibility 
of realigning and extending the Federal channel, Maumee River, Lucas 
County, Ohio.
    (s) Snake and Columbia Rivers, Oregon, Washington, and Idaho.--
            (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to assess 
        the authority of the Secretary to implement salmon protection 
        measures in operating dams on the Snake and Columbia Rivers, 
        Oregon, Washington, and Idaho.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress 
        a report on the results of the study conducted under paragraph 
        (1), including recommendations for any additional authority 
        needed to implement such protection measures.
    (t) Cumberland River, Davidson County, Tennessee.--
            (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
        benefits of establishing a greenway along the Cumberland River, 
        Davidson County, Tennessee.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress 
        a report on the results of the study conducted under paragraph 
        (1).
    (u) John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs, Virginia and North 
Carolina.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the advisability of 
modifying the multi-purpose project for the John H. Kerr and Philpott 
Reservoirs, Virginia and North Carolina, authorized by section 10 of 
the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 894)--
            (1) to include environmental enhancement, public 
        recreational opportunities, regional economic development, and 
        increased public participation in shoreline management as 
        management goals of the project; and
            (2) to authorize the use of power sale revenues for 
        operation, maintenance, and capital improvements for the 
        project.

SEC. 115. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects are not authorized after 
the date of the enactment of this Act:
            (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The following portion 
        of the project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
        (72 Stat. 297): A 2-acre anchorage area with a depth of 6 feet 
        at the head of Johnsons River between the existing Federal 
        channel and Hollisters Dam.
            (2) Johnsons river channel, bridgeport harbor, 
        connecticut.--The following portion of the project for 
        navigation, Johnsons River Channel, Bridgeport Harbor, 
        Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Rivers and 
        Harbors Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 634): Northerly of a 
        line across the Federal channel. The coordinates of such line 
        are N 123318.35, E 486301.68 and N 123257.15, E 486380.77.
            (3) Southport harbor, connecticut.--
                    (A) Deauthorization portion of project.--The 
                following portions of the project for navigation, 
                Southport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first 
                section of the Rivers and Harbors Act of August 30, 
                1935 (49 Stat. 1029):
                            (i) The 6-foot deep anchorage located at 
                        the head of the project.
                            (ii) The portion of the 9-foot deep channel 
                        beginning at a bend in the channel whose 
                        coordinates are north 109131.16, east 452653.32 
                        running thence in a northeasterly direction 
                        about 943.01 feet to a point whose coordinates 
                        are north 109635.22, east 453450.31 running 
                        thence in a southeasterly direction about 22.66 
                        feet to a point whose coordinates are north 
                        109617.15, east 453463.98 running thence in a 
                        southwesterly direction about 945.18 feet to 
                        the point of beginning.
                    (B) Remainder.--The remaining portion of the 
                project referred to in subparagraph (A) northerly of a 
                line whose coordinates are north 108699.15, east 
                452768.36 and north 108655.66, east 452858.73 shall be 
                redesignated as an anchorage.
            (4) Falmouth, massachusetts.--The following portions of the 
        project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1948 
        (62 Stat. 1172):
                    (A) The portion commencing at a point north 
                199286.37 east 844394.81 a line running north 73 
                degrees 09 minutes 24.6 seconds east 440.44 feet to a 
                point north 199413.99 east 844816.36, thence turning 
                and running north 43 degrees 09 minutes 34.5 seconds 
                east 119.99 feet to a point north 199501.52 east 
                844898.44, thence turning and running south 66 degrees 
                52 minutes 04.4 seconds east 547.66 feet returning to a 
                point north 199286.37 east 844394.81.
                    (B) The portion commencing at a point north 
                199647.42 east 845035.25 a line running north 43 
                degrees 09 minutes 35.0 seconds east 767.14 feet to a 
                point north 200207.01 east 845560.00, thence turning 
                and running north 11 degrees 04 minutes 24.3 seconds 
                west 380.08 feet to a point north 200580.01 east 
                845487.00, thence turning and running north 22 degrees 
                05 minutes 50.8 seconds east 1332.36 feet to a point 
                north 201814.50 east 845988.21, thence turning and 
                running north 02 degrees 54 minutes 15.7 seconds east 
                15.0 feet to a point north 201829.48 east 845988.97, 
                thence turning and running south 23 degrees 36 minutes 
                31.9 seconds west 2381.38 feet returning to the point 
                north 199647.42 east 845035.25.
            (5) Oswegatchie river, ogdensburg new york.--The portion of 
        the Federal channel of the project for navigation, Ogdensburg 
        Harbor, New York, authorized by the first section of the Rivers 
        and Harbors Appropriations Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 635), 
        as modified by the first section of the Rivers and Harbors Act 
        of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1037), which is in the Oswegatchie 
        River in Ogdensburg, New York, from the southernmost alignment 
        of the Route 68 bridge upstream to the northernmost alignment 
        of the Lake Street bridge.
    (b) Redesignation.--The portion of the project for navigation 
Falmouth, Massachusetts, referred to in subsection (a)(4) upstream of a 
line designated by the 2 points north 199463.18 east 844496.40 and 
north 199350.36 east 844544.60 is redesignated as an anchorage area.

SEC. 116. NAMINGS.

    (a) Milt Brandt Visitors Center, California.--
            (1) Designation.--The visitors center at Warm Springs Dam, 
        California, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act 
        of 1962 (76 Stat. 1192), shall be known and designated as the 
        ``Milt Brandt Visitors Center''.
            (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the visitors center referred to in paragraph (1) 
        shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Milt Brandt Visitors 
        Center''.
    (b) William H. Natcher Bridge, Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, 
Indiana.--
            (1) Designation.--The bridge on United States Route 231 
        which crosses the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and 
        Rockport, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the 
        ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.
            (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the bridge referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 
        deemed to be a reference to the ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.
    (c) J. Edward Roush Lake, Indiana.--
            (1) Redesignation.--The lake on the Wabash River in 
        Huntington and Wells Counties, Indiana, authorized by section 
        203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 312), and known 
        as Huntington Lake, shall be known and designated as the ``J. 
        Edward Roush Lake''.
            (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the lake referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed 
        to be a reference to the ``J. Edward Roush Lake''.
    (d) Lock and Dam 4, Red River Waterway, Louisiana.--
            (1) Designation.--Lock and Dam 4 of the Red River Waterway, 
        Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the ``Russell B. 
        Long Lock and Dam''.
            (2) Legal references.--A reference in any law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the lock and dam referred to in paragraph (1) shall 
        be deemed to be a reference to the ``Russell B. Long Lock and 
        Dam''.
    (e) Lock and Dam 3, Red River Waterway, Louisiana.--
            (1) Designation.--Lock and Dam 3 of the Red River Waterway, 
        Louisiana, shall be known and designated the ``Edwin W. Edwards 
        Lock and Dam''.
            (2) Legal references.--A reference in any law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the lock and dam referred to in paragraph (1) shall 
        be deemed to be a reference to the ``Edwin W. Edwards Lock and 
        Dam''.

               TITLE II--GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS

SEC. 201. RECREATION POLICY AND USER FEES.

    (a) Recreation Policies.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide increased 
        emphasis on and opportunities for recreation at water resources 
        projects operated, maintained, or constructed by the Corps of 
        Engineers.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress 
        a report on specific measures taken to implement this 
        subsection.
    (b) Recreation User Fees.--Section 210(b) of the Flood Control Act 
of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 460d-3(b)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(5) Use of fees collected at facility.--The Secretary of 
        the Army shall ensure that at least an amount equal to the 
        total amount of fees collected at any project under this 
        subsection in a fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1994, 
        are expended in the succeeding fiscal year at such project for 
        operation and maintenance of recreational facilities at such 
        project.''.

SEC. 202. RECOVERY OF COSTS.

    Amounts recovered under section 107 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 
U.S.C. 9607) for any response action taken by the Secretary in support 
of the Army Civil Works program shall be credited to the appropriate 
trust fund account from which the cost of such response action has been 
paid or will be charged.

SEC. 203. COST SHARING OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS.

    Section 103(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213(c)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (5);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(7) subject to section 906 of this Act, environmental 
        protection and restoration: 25 percent.''.

SEC. 204. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
              INTERESTS.

    (a) Authority.--Non-Federal interests are authorized to undertake 
flood control projects in the United States, subject to obtaining any 
permits required pursuant to Federal and State laws, in advance of 
actual construction.
    (b) Studies and Engineering.--
            (1) By non-federal interests.--A non-Federal interest may 
        prepare, for review and approval by the Secretary, the 
        necessary studies and engineering for any construction to be 
        undertaken pursuant to subsection (a).
            (2) By secretary.--Upon request of an appropriate non-
        Federal interest, the Secretary may undertake all necessary 
        studies and engineering for any construction to be undertaken 
        pursuant to subsection (a) and provide technical assistance in 
        obtaining all necessary permits for such construction if the 
        non-Federal interest contracts with the Secretary to furnish 
        the United States funds for the studies and engineering during 
        the period that the studies and engineering will be conducted.
    (c) Completion of Studies.--The Secretary is authorized to complete 
and transmit to the appropriate non-Federal interests any study for 
flood control which was initiated before the date of the enactment of 
this Act or, upon the request of such non-Federal interests, to 
terminate the study and transmit the partially completed study to such 
non-Federal interests for completion. Studies subject to this 
subsection shall be completed without regard to the requirements of 
subsection (b).
    (d) Authority To Carry Out Improvement.--
            (1) In general.--Any non-Federal interest which has 
        received from the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) a 
        favorable recommendation to carry out a flood control project 
        or separable element thereof based on the results of completed 
        studies and engineering for the project or element, may carry 
        out the project or element if a final environmental impact 
        statement has been filed for the project or element.
            (2) Permits.--Any plan of improvement proposed to be 
        implemented in accordance with this subsection shall be deemed 
        to satisfy the requirements for obtaining the appropriate 
        permits required under the Secretary's authority and such 
        permits shall be granted subject to the non-Federal interest's 
        acceptance of the terms and conditions of such permits if the 
        Secretary determines that the applicable regulatory criteria 
        and procedures have been satisfied.
            (3) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall monitor any project 
        for which a permit is granted under this subsection in order to 
        ensure that such project is constructed (and, in those cases 
        where such activities will not be the responsibility of the 
        Secretary, operated and maintained) in accordance with the 
        terms and conditions of such permit.
    (e) Reimbursement.--
            (1) General rule.--Subject to appropriation Acts, the 
        Secretary is authorized to reimburse any non-Federal interest 
        an amount equal to the estimate of the Federal share, without 
        interest, of the cost of any authorized flood control project, 
        or separable element thereof, constructed pursuant to this 
        section--
                    (A) if, after authorization and before initiation 
                of construction of the project or separable element, 
                the Secretary approves the plans for construction of 
                such project by the non-Federal interest; and
                    (B) if the Secretary finds, after a review of 
                studies and engineering prepared pursuant to this 
                section, that construction of the project or separable 
                element is economically justified and environmentally 
                acceptable.
            (2) Matters to be considered in reviewing plans.--In 
        reviewing plans under this subsection, the Secretary shall 
        consider budgetary and programmatic priorities and other 
        factors that the Secretary deems appropriate.
            (3) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall regularly monitor and 
        audit any project for flood control constructed under this 
        section by a non-Federal interest in order to ensure that such 
        construction is in compliance with the plans approved by the 
        Secretary and that the costs are reasonable.
            (4) Limitation on reimbursements.--No reimbursement shall 
        be made under this section unless and until the Secretary has 
        certified that the work for which reimbursement is requested 
        has been performed in accordance with applicable permits and 
        approved plans.
    (f) Treatment of Flood Damage Prevention Measures.--For the 
purposes of this section, flood damage prevention measures at or in the 
vicinity of Morgan City and Berwick, Louisiana, shall be treated as an 
authorized element of the Atchafalaya Basin feature of the project for 
flood control, Mississippi River and Tributaries.

SEC. 205. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

    Section 7 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 
4022-4023) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``civil works'' before 
        ``mission'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) as 
        subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f), respectively;
            (3) in subsection (d), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``(b)'' and inserting ``(c)'';
            (4) by striking subsection (f), as so redesignated; and
            (5) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(b) Pre-Agreement Temporary Protection of Technology.--If the 
Secretary determines that information developed as a result of research 
and development activities conducted by the Corps of Engineers is 
likely to be subject to a cooperative research and development 
agreement within 2 years of its development and that such information 
would be a trade secret or commercial or financial information that 
would be privileged or confidential if the information had been 
obtained from a non-Federal party participating in a cooperative 
research and development agreement under section 12 of the Stevenson-
Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980, the Secretary may provide 
appropriate protection against the dissemination of such information, 
including exemption from subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, United 
States Code, until the earlier of the date the Secretary enters into 
such an agreement with respect to such technology or the last day of 
the 2-year period beginning on the date of such determination. Any 
technology covered by this section which becomes the subject of a 
cooperative research and development agreement shall be accorded the 
protection provided under section 12(c)(7)(B) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 
3710a(c)(7)(B)) as if such technology had been developed under a 
cooperative research and development agreement.''.

SEC. 206. NATIONAL INVENTORY OF DAMS.

    Section 13 of Public Law 92-367 (33 U.S.C. 467l), is amended by 
striking the second sentence and inserting the following: ``There is 
authorized to be appropriated $500,000 for each fiscal year for the 
purpose of carrying out this section.''.

SEC. 207. MAINTENANCE, REHABILITATION, AND MODERNIZATION OF FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--In accomplishing the maintenance, rehabilitation, 
and modernization of hydroelectric power generating facilities at water 
resources projects under the jurisdiction of the Department of the 
Army, the Secretary is authorized to increase the efficiency of energy 
production and the capacity of these facilities if, after consulting 
with other appropriate Federal and State agencies, the Secretary 
determines that such uprating--
            (1) is economically justified and financially feasible;
            (2) will not result in significant adverse effects on the 
        other purposes for which the project is authorized;
            (3) will not result in significant adverse environmental 
        impacts; and
            (4) will not involve major structural or operation changes 
        in the project.
    (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in subsection 
(a) shall be construed as affecting the authority of the Secretary and 
the Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration under section 
2406 of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 839d-1).

SEC. 208. FEDERAL LUMP-SUM PAYMENTS FOR FEDERAL OPERATION AND 
              MAINTENANCE COSTS.

    (a) In General.--At a water resources project where the non-Federal 
interest is responsible for performing the operation, maintenance, 
replacement, and rehabilitation of the project and the Federal 
Government is responsible for paying a portion of the operation, 
maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation costs, the Secretary may 
provide, under terms and conditions acceptable to the Secretary and the 
non-Federal interest, a payment of the estimated total Federal share of 
such costs to the non-Federal interest after completion of construction 
of the project or a separable element thereof.
    (b) Determination of Amount.--The amount to be paid shall be equal 
to the present value of the Federal payments over the life of the 
project, as agreed by the Federal Government and the non-Federal 
interest, and shall be computed using an interest rate determined by 
the Secretary of the Treasury taking into consideration current market 
yields on outstanding marketable obligations of the United States with 
maturities comparable to the remaining life of the project.
    (c) Agreement.--The Secretary may make a payment under this section 
only if the non-Federal interest has entered into a binding agreement 
with the Secretary to perform the operation, maintenance, replacement, 
and rehabilitation of the project or separable element. The agreement 
must be in accordance with the requirements of section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1831) and must contain provisions 
specifying the terms and conditions under which a payment may be made 
under this section and the rights of, and remedies available to, the 
Federal Government to recover all or a portion of a payment made under 
this section in the event the non-Federal interest suspends or 
terminates its performance of operation, maintenance, replacement, and 
rehabilitation of the project or separable element or fails to perform 
such activities in a manner consistent with the agreement between the 
Secretary and the non-Federal interest.
    (d) Relief From Future Obligations.--Except as provided in 
subsection (c), a payment provided to the non-Federal interest under 
this section shall relieve the Government of any future obligations for 
paying any of the operation, maintenance, replacement, and 
rehabilitation costs for the project or separable element.

SEC. 209. LONG-TERM SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES.

    (a) Development.--The Secretary shall enter into cooperative 
agreements with non-Federal sponsors of navigation projects for 
development of long-term management strategies for controlling 
sediments in such projects.
    (b) Contents of Strategies.--Each strategy developed under this 
section for a navigation project--
            (1) shall include assessments of the following with respect 
        to the project: sediment rates and composition, sediment 
        reduction options, dredging practices, long-term management of 
        any dredged material disposal facilities, remediation of such 
        facilities, and alternative disposal and reuse options;
            (2) shall include a timetable for implementation of the 
        strategy; and
            (3) shall incorporate, as much as possible, relevant 
        ongoing planning efforts, including remedial action planning, 
        dredged material management planning, harbor and waterfront 
        development planning, and watershed management planning.
    (c) Consultation.--In developing strategies under this section, the 
Secretary shall consult with interested Federal agencies, States, and 
Indian tribes and the public.

SEC. 210. EMERGENCY RESPONSE.

    Section 5(a)(1) of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood 
control, and for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 
701n(a)(1)), is amended by inserting before the first semicolon the 
following: ``, or in implementation of nonstructural alternatives to 
the repair or restoration of such flood control work if requested by 
the non-Federal sponsor''.

SEC. 211. OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL REQUIREMENT.

    (a) Penalty.--Section 16 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 
1153; 33 U.S.C. 411), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``thirteen, fourteen, and fifteen'' and 
        inserting ``13, 14, 15, 19, and 20''; and
            (2) by striking ``not exceeding twenty-five hundred dollars 
        nor less than five hundred dollars'' and inserting ``of up to 
        $25,000 per day''.
    (b) General Authority.--Section 20 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (30 
Stat. 1154; 33 U.S.C. 415), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``expense'' the first place it appears in 
        subsection (a) and inserting ``actual expense, including 
        administrative expenses,'';
            (2) in subsection (b) by striking ``cost'' and inserting 
        ``actual cost, including administrative costs,'';
            (3) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (4) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(b) Removal Requirement.--Within 24 hours after the Secretary of 
the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating issues an order to 
stop or delay navigation in any navigable waters of the United States 
because of conditions related to the sinking or grounding of a vessel, 
the owner or operator of the vessel, with the approval of the Secretary 
of the Army, shall begin removal of the vessel using the most 
expeditious removal method available or, if appropriate, secure the 
vessel pending removal to allow navigation to resume. If the owner or 
operator fails to begin removal or to secure the vessel pending removal 
or fails to complete removal as soon as possible, the Secretary of the 
Army shall remove or destroy the vessel using the summary removal 
procedures under subsection (a) of this section.''.

SEC. 212. SMALL PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``$12,500,000'' and inserting 
        ``$15,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``$500,000'' and inserting ``$1,500,000''.

SEC. 213. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL.

    Section 104(b) of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 
610(b)) is amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting 
``$25,000,000''.

SEC. 214. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    Section 204(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2326) is amended by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
``$50,000,000''.

SEC. 215. SEDIMENTS DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.

    (a) Project Purpose.--Section 405(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863; 33 U.S.C. 2239 note) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Project purpose.--The purpose of the project to be 
        carried out under this section is to provide for the 
        development of 1 or more sediment decontamination technologies 
        on a pilot scale demonstrating a capacity of at least 400 cubic 
        yards per day.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--The first sentence of section 
405(c) of such Act is amended to read as follows: ``There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for fiscal 
years 1993 and 1994 and $10,000,000 for fiscal years beginning after 
September 30, 1994.''.
    (c) Reports.--Section 405 of such Act is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(d) Reports.--Not later than September 30, 1996, and periodically 
thereafter, the Administrator and the Secretary shall transmit to 
Congress a report on the results of the project to be carried out under 
this section, including an assessment of the progress made in achieving 
the intent of the program set forth in subsection (a)(3).''.

SEC. 216. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Before'' at the beginning of the second 
        sentence and inserting ``Upon''; and
            (2) by inserting ``planning, designing, or'' before 
        ``construction'' in the last sentence.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Section 52 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 579a note; 102 Stat. 4044) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a); and
            (2) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) as 
        subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively.

SEC. 217. FOREIGN TRAVEL.

    Section 211 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 183) is 
repealed.

SEC. 218. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

    (a) General Authority.--In carrying out research and development in 
support of the civil works program of the Department of the Army, the 
Secretary may utilize contracts, cooperative research and development 
agreements, cooperative agreements, and grants with non-Federal 
entities, including State and local governments, colleges and 
universities, consortia, professional and technical societies, public 
and private scientific and technical foundations, research 
institutions, educational organizations, and non-profit organizations.
    (b) Special Rules.--With respect to contracts for research and 
development, the Secretary may include requirements that have potential 
commercial application and may also use such potential application as 
an evaluation factor where appropriate.

SEC. 219. HOPPER DREDGE FLEET.

    (a) In General.--In order to more effectively manage and protect 
the commercial viability of the Nation's vital deep draft seaports, the 
Secretary--
            (1) shall conduct advanced maintenance sufficient to ensure 
        that authorized deep draft channel dimensions are continuously 
        maintained;
            (2) may conduct analysis and demonstration of experimental 
        maintenance dredging techniques or improved environmental 
        techniques in federally authorized deep draft navigation 
        channels in order to evaluate the ability of such techniques to 
        increase the reliability of channel dimensions; except that any 
        dredging undertaken pursuant to this paragraph shall be limited 
        and shall not replace or be substituted for routine maintenance 
        dredging;
            (3) shall, to the maximum extent practicable, utilize 
        sediments dredged under paragraphs (1) and (2) for beneficial 
        purposes; and
            (4) shall contract for private dredging services to perform 
        priority-expedited dredging work unless the appropriate 
        District Engineer of Corps of Engineers determines that a 
        Federal dredge can be brought on scene more quickly or is 
        operationally better suited to undertake the work than any 
        available non-Federal dredge.
With respect to priority-expedited dredging work undertaken under 
paragraph (4), the District Engineer shall employ innovative, expedited 
contracting procedures to ensure a timely response. In the case of 
contract disputes, the District Engineer is authorized to employ 
whatever measures are necessary to accomplish the priority-expedited 
dredging work.
    (b) Hopper Dredge Fleet Requirements.--In order to ensure the 
continued viability of the Federal hopper dredge fleet and private 
industry hopper dredge fleet, the Secretary--
            (1) shall, except as provided in section 345 of this Act, 
        relating to the hopper dredge, McFarland, maintain the Federal 
        minimum hopper dredge fleet for at least 4 years or more 
        beginning in fiscal year 1995 in a fully operational and active 
        status;
            (2) may undertake measures to maintain or improve the 
        efficiency, operation, and design of the Federal hopper dredge 
        fleet; and
            (3) shall, for fiscal years beginning in fiscal year 1995 
        and ending in fiscal year 1998, advertise for competitive bid 
        at least 7,500,000 cubic yards of hopper dredge work formerly 
        accomplished by the Government fleet in years preceding fiscal 
        year 1992 consistent with the policies developed by the 
        Secretary to implement the requirements of section 106 of the 
        Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 
        Stat. 1326) and section 106 of the Energy and Water Development 
        Appropriations Act, 1994 (107 Stat. 1320); except that (A) 
        hopper dredge work which results from activities undertaken in 
        accordance with subsection (a)(1) or (a)(2) shall be advertised 
        for competitive bid and shall not be counted toward the 
        7,500,000 cubic yards required to be advertised by this 
        paragraph; and (B) operation of the Corps of Engineers hopper 
        dredge fleet resulting from activities undertaken in accordance 
        with subsections (a)(2) and (a)(4) shall not be used to 
        determine days of operation of the Corps of Engineers hopper 
        dredge fleet necessary to achieve the 7,500,000 cubic yards 
        required to be advertised by this paragraph.
    (c) Priority-Expedited Dredging Work Defined.--For purposes of this 
section, the term ``priority-expedited dredging work'' means work 
necessary to maintain a federally authorized deep draft navigation 
channel at project dimensions whenever the appropriate District 
Engineer of the Corps of Engineers determines that siltation, 
sedimentation, or other events altering channel dimensions has caused, 
or is anticipated to cause, imminent impairment of ongoing commercial 
navigation.
    (d) Use of Corps Dredge Fleet.--Notwithstanding the provisions of 
this section, the Secretary is authorized to use the dredge fleet of 
the Corps of Engineers to undertake projects when industry does not 
perform as required by the contract specifications or when the bids are 
more than 25 percent in excess of what the Secretary determines to be a 
fair and reasonable estimated cost of a well-equipped contractor doing 
the work or to respond to emergency requirements.

SEC. 220. RESTORATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.

    Section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4251-4252; 33 U.S.C. 2309a) is amended--
            (1) by striking the period at the end of subsection (a) and 
        inserting the following: ``and to determine if the operation of 
        such projects has contributed to the degradation of the quality 
        of the environment.'';
            (2) by striking the last 2 sentences of subsection (b);
            (3) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as 
        subsections (e), (f), and (g), respectively; and
            (4) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
        subsections:
    ``(c) Restoration of Environmental Quality.--If the Secretary 
determines that operation of a water resources project constructed by 
the Secretary has contributed to the degradation of the quality of the 
environment, the Secretary may undertake measures for restoration of 
environmental quality if such measures are feasible and consistent with 
the authorized project purposes.
    ``(d) Non-Federal Share; Limitation on Maximum Federal 
Expenditure.--The non-Federal share of the cost of any modifications or 
measures carried out or undertaken pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) of 
this section shall be 25 percent. Not more than 80 percent of the non-
Federal share may be in kind, including a facility, supply, or service 
that is necessary to carry out the modification. No more than 
$5,000,000 in Federal funds may be expended on any single modification 
or measure carried out or undertaken pursuant to this section.''.

SEC. 221. COST SHARING FOR CREATION OF DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL AREAS.

    (a) Federal Share.--Section 101(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(b)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1) In general.--'' before ``The Federal 
        share'';
            (2) by indenting and moving paragraph (1), as so 
        designated, 2 ems to the right; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Confined disposal facilities.--The Federal share of 
        the cost of project features that are necessary for the 
        creation of dredged material disposal areas, including capping, 
        retaining dikes, bulkheads, embankments, and associated 
        structures, shall be determined in accordance with subsection 
        (a)(1).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 101 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 
2211) is amended--
            (1) in the second sentence of subsection (a)(2)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and'' after ``rights-of-way,''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``, and dredged material disposal 
                areas'';
            (2) in subsection (a)(3)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and'' after ``rights-of-way,''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``, and dredged material disposal 
                areas'' and inserting ``, including those required for 
                dredged material disposal areas,''; and
            (3) in subsection (e)(1) by striking ``, and to provide 
        dredged material disposal areas''.
    (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
shall apply to construction of dredged material disposal areas for 
which a contract for construction has not been awarded before the date 
of the enactment of this Act. The Secretary may amend any cooperation 
agreement entered into before such date of enactment that does not 
provide for a Federal share of project costs of dredged material 
disposal areas as determined in accordance with such amendments if the 
non-Federal interest agrees to the amendment of the contract.

SEC. 222. LOSS OF LIFE PREVENTION.

    Section 904 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2281) is amended by inserting ``including the loss of life which 
may be associated with flooding and coastal storm events,'' after 
``costs,''.

SEC. 223. SENSE OF CONGRESS; REQUIREMENT REGARDING NOTICE.

    (a) Purchase of American-Made Equipment and Products.--It is the 
sense of Congress that, to the greatest extent practicable, all 
equipment and products purchased with funds made available under this 
Act should be American-made.
    (b) Notice to Recipients of Assistance.--In providing financial 
assistance under this Act, the Secretary, to the greatest extent 
practicable, shall provide to each recipient of the assistance a notice 
describing the statement made in subsection (a).

SEC. 224. RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

    Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 2319; 104 Stat. 4639) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a); and
            (2) by striking ``(b) Public Participa-tion.--''.

SEC. 225. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.

    (a) Section  203 of 1992 Act.--Section 203(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4826) is amended by 
striking ``(8662)'' and inserting ``(8862)''.
    (b) Section  225 of 1992 Act.--Section 225(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4838) is amended by 
striking ``(8662)'' in the second sentence and inserting ``(8862)''.

                  TITLE III--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 301. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to provide technical, 
planning, and design assistance to non-Federal interests for carrying 
out watershed management, restoration, and development projects at the 
locations described in subsection (d).
    (b) Specific Measures.--Projects carried out pursuant to subsection 
(a) may include the following purposes:
            (1) Management and restoration of water quality.
            (2) Control and remediation of toxic sediments.
            (3) Restoration of degraded streams, rivers, wetlands, and 
        other waterbodies to their natural state as a means to control 
        flooding, excessive erosion, and sedimentation.
            (4) Protection and restoration of watersheds, including 
        urban watersheds.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of a 
project for which assistance is provided under this section shall be 50 
percent. The non-Federal share shall be subject to the ability of the 
non-Federal interest to pay, including application of the procedures 
and regulations relating to ability to pay established under section 
103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.
    (d) Project Locations.--The Secretary may provide assistance under 
subsection (a) for projects at the following locations:
            (1) Colusa basin, California.
            (2) Los Angeles River basin, California.
            (3) Russian River watershed, California.
            (4) Sacramento River watershed, California.
            (5) Nancy Creek, Utoy Creek, and North Peachtree Creek and 
        South Peachtree Creek basin, Georgia.
            (6) Morgan, Floyd, Pulaski, Wayne, Laurel, Knox, Pike, 
        Menifee, Perry, Harlan, Breathitt, Martin, Jackson, Wolfe, 
        Clay, Magoffin, Owsley, Johnson, Leslie, Lawrence, Knott, Bell, 
        McCreary, Rockcastle, Whitley, Lee, and Letcher Counties, 
        Kentucky.
            (7) Lower Platte River watershed, Nebraska.
            (8) Upper Potomac River watershed, Grant and Mineral 
        Counties, West Virginia.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $50,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after Septem-- ber 30, 1994. Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 302. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148-4149) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (10);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (11) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(12) Oneida Lake, Oneida County, New York, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth;
            ``(13) Skaneateles and Owasco Lakes, New York, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth and prevention of sediment deposit; and
            ``(14) Twin Lakes, Paris, Illinois, removal of silt and 
        excess aquatic vegetation, including measures to address 
        excessive sedimentation, high nutrient concentration, and 
        shoreline erosion.''.

SEC. 303. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

    Section 219(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4836) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
``$50,000,000''.

SEC. 304. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

    Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4639-4640) is amended--
            (1) in each of subsections (a), (b), and (c) by inserting 
        ``and remediate'' after ``remove'' each place it appears;
            (2) in subsection (b)(1) by inserting ``and remediation'' 
        after ``removal'' each place it appears;
            (3) in subsection (b)(2) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$50,000,000''; and
            (4) by striking subsection (f).

SEC. 305. CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION AND PROTECTION PROGRAM.

    (a) Establishment.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a pilot 
        program to provide assistance to non-Federal interests in the 
        Chesapeake Bay watershed.
            (2) Form.--The assistance shall be in the form of 
        technical, planning, and design assistance for water-related 
        environmental infrastructure and resource protection and 
        development projects affecting the Chesapeake Bay, including 
        projects for sediment and erosion control, protection of 
        eroding shorelines, protection of essential public works, waste 
        water treatment and related facilities, water supply and 
        related facilities, and beneficial uses of dredged material, 
        and other related projects.
    (b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned, and will be publicly operated and maintained.
    (c) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
        agreement pursuant to section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (84 Stat. 1818) with a non-Federal interest to provide for 
        technical, planning, and design assistance for the project.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal, State, and local 
                officials, of a plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications and an estimate of expected 
                benefits.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation and maintenance of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
    (d) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws and Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Nothing in this section waives, limits, or 
        otherwise affects the applicability of any provision of Federal 
        or State law that would otherwise apply to a project carried 
        out with assistance provided under this section.
            (2) Cooperation.--In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary shall cooperate with the heads of appropriate Federal 
        agencies.
    (e) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out 
under this section, together with a recommendation concerning whether 
or not the program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for fiscal year 
1995. Such sums shall remain available until expended.

SEC. 306. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY COLLECTION OF TOLLS.

    Section 13 of the Act of May 13, 1954 (33 U.S.C. 988a) is amended 
to read as follows:

``SEC. 13. WAIVER OF COLLECTION OF CHARGES AND TOLLS.

    ``(a) Waiver.--Notwithstanding section 12 or any other provision of 
law, the Corporation shall not collect any charge or toll established 
pursuant to section 12 with respect to a commercial vessel (as defined 
by section 4462(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    ``(b) Record.--The Corporation shall maintain a record of the 
annual amount of each charge or toll that would have been collected 
with respect to a commercial vessel described in subsection (a) but for 
the requirement of subsection (a).''.

SEC. 307. RIVER BASIN PLAN FOR LOWER MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) Development.--The Secretary shall develop a comprehensive river 
basin management plan that addresses the long-term ecological, 
economic, and flood control needs of the basin of the Lower Mississippi 
River system.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1994. Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 308. EXTENSION OF JURISDICTION OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION.

    The jurisdiction of the Mississippi River Commission, established 
by the Act of June 29, 1879 (33 U.S.C. 641), is extended to include all 
of the area between the eastern side of the Bayou Lafourche Ridge from 
Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to the Gulf of Mexico and the west guide 
levee of the Mississippi River from Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to the 
Gulf of Mexico.

SEC. 309. GREAT LAKES DREDGED MATERIAL TESTING AND EVALUATION MANUAL.

    The Secretary, in cooperation with the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, shall provide technical assistance to 
non-Federal interests on testing procedures contained in the Great 
Lakes Dredged Material Testing and Evaluation Manual developed pursuant 
to section 230.2(c) of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations.

SEC. 310. GREAT LAKES SEDIMENT REDUCTION.

    (a) Great Lakes Tributary Sediment Transport Model.--For each major 
river system or set of major river systems depositing sediment into a 
Great Lakes federally authorized commercial harbor, channel maintenance 
project site, or Area of Concern, the Secretary, in consultation and 
coordination with the Great Lakes States, shall develop a tributary 
sediment transport model.
    (b) Requirements for Models.--In developing a tributary sediment 
transport model under this section, the Secretary shall--
            (1) build upon data and monitoring infrastructure generated 
        in earlier studies and programs of the Great Lakes and their 
        tributaries; and
            (2) complete models for 30 major river systems within the 
        5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
        Act.

SEC. 311. CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITIES.

    (a) Assessment.--The Secretary shall conduct an assessment of the 
general conditions of confined disposal facilities in the Great Lakes.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the assessment conducted under subsection (a), including the 
following:
            (1) A description of the cumulative effects of confined 
        disposal facilities in the Great Lakes.
            (2) Recommendations for specific remediation actions for 
        each confined disposal facility in the Great Lakes.
            (3) An evaluation of, and recommendations for, confined 
        disposal facility management practices and technologies to 
        conserve capacity at such facilities and to minimize adverse 
        environmental effects at such facilities throughout the Great 
        Lakes system.

SEC. 312. ALTERNATIVE TO ANNUAL PASSES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a project to 
evaluate the feasibility of implementing an alternative to the $25 
annual pass that the Secretary currently offers to users of recreation 
facilities at water resources projects of the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Annual Pass.--The project to be carried out under this section 
shall include the establishment of an annual pass which costs $10 or 
less for the use of recreation facilities at Raystown Lake, 
Pennsylvania.
    (c) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1997, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the project carried out 
under this section, together with recommendations concerning whether 
annual passes for individual projects should be offered on a nationwide 
basis.

SEC. 313. RECREATION PARTNERSHIP INITIATIVE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall promote Federal, non-Federal, 
and private sector cooperation in creating public recreation 
opportunities and developing the necessary supporting infrastructure at 
water resources projects of the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Infrastructure Improvements.--
            (1) Recreation infrastructure improvements.--In 
        demonstrating the feasibility of the public-private 
        cooperative, the Secretary shall provide, at Federal expense, 
        such infrastructure improvements as are necessary to support a 
        potential private recreational development at the Raystown Lake 
        Project, Pennsylvania, generally in accordance with the Master 
        Plan Update (1994) for the project.
            (2) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
        with an appropriate non-Federal public entity to ensure that 
        the infrastructure improvements constructed by the Secretary on 
        non-project lands pursuant to paragraph (1) are transferred to 
        and operated and maintained by the non-Federal public entity.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $4,500,000 for 
        fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1994. Such sums 
        shall remain available until expended.
    (c) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1997, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the cooperative efforts 
carried out under this section, including the improvements required by 
subsection (b).

SEC. 314. WATER QUALITY PROJECTS.

    Section 307(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4841) is amended by striking ``$70,000,000'' and inserting 
``$100,000,000''.

SEC. 315. NEW ENGLAND DIVISION HEADQUARTERS FACILITY.

    (a) General Authority.--The Secretary may use Plant Replacement and 
Improvement Program funds to design and construct a new headquarters 
facility for the New England Division of the United States Army Corps 
of Engineers.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1994, 
$30,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 316. QUARANTINE FACILITY.

    Section 108(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4816) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
``$4,000,000''.

SEC. 317. BENTON AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES, ARKANSAS.

    Section 220 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4836-4837) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(c) Use of Federal Funds.--The Secretary may make available to 
the non-Federal interests funds not to exceed an amount equal to the 
Federal share of the total project cost to be used by the non-Federal 
interests to undertake the work directly or by contract.''.

SEC. 318. CALAVERAS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary, in cooperation with Federal, State, and local 
agencies, is authorized--
            (1) to conduct investigations and surveys of the watershed 
        of the Lower Mokelume River in Calaveras County, California; 
        and
            (2) to provide technical, planning, and design assistance 
        for abatement and mitigation of degradation caused by abandoned 
        mines and mining activity in the vicinity of such river.

SEC. 319. LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Maximum Allotment.--The maximum amount which may be allotted 
under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) for 
the project for flood control, Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, 
California, shall be $7,500,000 instead of $5,000,000.
    (b) Revision of Local Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the local cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) in order to take into account the increase in the 
Federal participation in such project pursuant to subsection (a).
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any cost-sharing requirement applicable to the project referred 
to in subsection (a) under the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.

SEC. 320. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL, MONTEZUMA, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for the beneficial use of 
dredged material at Montezuma, California, pursuant to section 204 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992.

SEC. 321. PRADO DAM SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS.

    The Secretary, in coordination with the State of California, shall 
provide technical assistance to Orange County, California, in 
developing appropriate public safety and access improvements associated 
with that portion of California State Route 71 being relocated for the 
Prado Dam feature of the project authorized as part of the project for 
flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem, California, by section 401(a) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113).

SEC. 322. SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall transfer funds appropriated to 
carry out this section to the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency for making grants to the city of San Jose, 
California, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District, San Jose, 
California, to promote and implement the use of treated waste water for 
critical water supply purposes and for the protection of San Francisco 
Bay.
    (b) Purposes of Assistance.--Assistance may be provided under this 
section for projects for the planning, design, and construction of 
facilities to reuse waste water in the San Jose area, including 
necessary distribution facilities. Design and construction of such 
projects shall be carried out by non-Federal interests.
    (c) Approval of Plans.--Upon approval of necessary plans and 
specifications, the Administrator is authorized to make grants under 
this section in accordance with the existing grant procedures of the 
Environmental Protection Agency.
    (d) Transfer of Funds.--The transfer of funds under subsection (a) 
shall occur pursuant to a memorandum of agreement between the Secretary 
and the Administrator. Such memorandum of agreement shall be entered 
into on or before the 60th day after the date upon which funds are made 
available to the Secretary to carry out this section.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
carried out under this section shall be 55 percent. Other Federal funds 
may be contributed to the project, and the non-Federal sponsors shall 
receive credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations 
toward its share of project costs. Operation and maintenance costs 
shall be 100 percent non-Federal.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $71,500,000. 
Such sums shall remain available until expended and shall be in 
addition to and not in lieu of any other amounts authorized to be 
appropriated under any other Act, including title II of the Federal 
Water Pollution Control Act.

SEC. 323. TAMPA, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement under section 
218 of this Act with the Museum of Science and Industry, Tampa, 
Florida, to provide technical, planning, and design assistance to 
demonstrate the water quality functions found in wetlands, at an 
estimated total Federal cost of $500,000.

SEC. 324. KANKAKEE RIVER BASIN, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Master Plan.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in cooperation with other 
interested Federal, State, and local agencies and private citizens, 
shall study, and prepare a comprehensive master plan for the management 
of, the Kankakee River Basin, Illinois. The study shall focus primarily 
on basinwide management methods for flood damage reduction, 
environmental enhancement, and erosion control and may evaluate water 
quality, land use management, and other related topics.
    (b) Feasibility Report.--Not later than 30 months after the date of 
completion of the study and plan under subsection (a), the Secretary 
shall prepare, in accordance with section 905 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282), a feasibility report 
concerning the measures described in the plan.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated $500,000 for the study and preparation of the plan 
required under subsection (a) and such sums as may be necessary to 
prepare the feasibility report required under subsection (b).

SEC. 325. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR DEEP RIVER BASIN, INDIANA.

    (a) Development.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Soil 
Conservation Service of the Department of Agriculture, shall develop a 
watershed management plan for the Deep River Basin, Indiana, which 
includes Deep River, Lake George, Turkey Creek, and other related 
tributaries in Indiana.
    (b) Contents.--The plan to be developed by the Secretary under 
subsection (a) shall address specific concerns related to the Deep 
River Basin area, including sediment flow into Deep River, Turkey 
Creek, and other tributaries; control of sediment quality in Lake 
George; flooding problems; the safety of the Lake George Dam; and 
watershed management.

SEC. 326. RESTORATION PROJECTS FOR MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, WEST 
              VIRGINIA, AND KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary, in cooperation with Federal, State, and local 
agencies, is authorized--
            (1) to conduct investigations and surveys of the watersheds 
        of the North Branch of the Potomac River, Maryland, 
        Pennsylvania, and West Virginia; New River, West Virginia; and 
        Pond Creek, Kentucky; and
            (2) to provide technical, planning, and design assistance 
        for abatement and mitigation of surface water quality 
        degradation caused by abandoned mines and mining activity in 
        the vicinity of such rivers and creek.

SEC. 327. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL, POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for the beneficial use of 
dredged material at Poplar Island, Maryland, pursuant to section 204 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992.

SEC. 328. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, SMITH ISLAND, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall implement erosion control 
measures in the vicinity of Rhodes Point, Smith Island, Maryland, at an 
estimated total Federal cost of $450,000.
    (b) Implementation on Emergency Basis.--The project under 
subsection (a) shall be carried out on an emergency basis in view of 
the national, historic, and cultural value of the island and in order 
to protect the Federal investment in infrastructure facilities.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing applicable to hurricane and storm 
damage reduction shall be applicable to the project to be carried out 
under subsection (a).

SEC. 329. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL, WORTON POINT, KENT 
              COUNTY, MARYLAND.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for the beneficial use of 
dredged material at Worton Point, Kent County, Maryland, pursuant to 
section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992.

SEC. 330. MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL SALTMARSH RESTORATION AUTHORIZATION.

    Subject to the cost sharing provisions of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, the Secretary shall, as part of the long-term 
goal of Corps of Engineers water resources development program of 
increasing the quality and quantity of the Nation's wetlands, 
investigate and carry out saltmarsh restoration projects along the 
coastline of Massachusetts.

SEC. 331. BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT.

    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary shall develop and 
implement alternative methods for disposal of contaminated dredged 
material at the Port of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, using innovative 
and environmental technologies, including thermal remediation.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1994, to 
carry out this sect ion $2,000,000. Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 332. LAKE ST. CLAIRE, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall carry out a program to control aquatic plants 
in Lake St. Claire, Michigan, under section 104(b) of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610(b)).

SEC. 333. DULUTH, MINNESOTA, ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT.

    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary shall develop and 
implement alternative methods for decontamination and disposal of 
contaminated dredged material at the Port of Duluth, Minnesota.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1994, to 
carry out this section $1,000,000. Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 334. ST. JOHN'S BAYOU--NEW MADRID FLOODWAY.

    The Secretary is directed to review the project for flood control, 
St. John's Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Missouri, authorized by 
section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4118), to determine the ability of the non-Federal interests to 
pay the project costs, including operation and maintenance costs, in 
accordance with section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) and in light of locally prevailing 
conditions which would limit the ability of local interests to 
participate as non-Federal project sponsors in accordance with 
established cost-sharing formulas.

SEC. 335. DURHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    The Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement under section 
218 of this Act with the University of New Hampshire to provide 
technical assistance for a water treatment technology center addressing 
the needs of small communities.

SEC. 336. NEW YORK BIGHT AND HARBOR STUDY.

    Section 326(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4851) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
``$10,000,000''.

SEC. 337. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to make capital 
improvements to the New York State Canal System.
    (b) Agreements.--The Secretary shall, with the consent of 
appropriate local and State entities, enter into such arrangements, 
contracts, and leases with public and private entities as may be 
necessary for the purposes of rehabilitation, renovation, preservation, 
and maintenance of the New York State Canal System and its related 
facilities, including trailside facilities and other recreational 
projects along the waterways of the canal system.
    (c) New York State Canal System Defined.--In this section, the term 
``New York State Canal System'' means the Erie, Oswego, Champlain, and 
Cayuga-Seneca Canals.
    (d) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of capital 
improvements under this section shall be 50 percent.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1994. Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 338. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED.

    (a) Establishment.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a program 
        for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests 
        in the New York City Watershed.
            (2) Form.--Assistance provided under this section may be in 
        the form of design and construction assistance for water-
        related environmental infrastructure and resource protection 
        and development projects in the New York City Watershed, 
        including projects for water supply, storage, treatment, and 
        distribution facilities, and surface water resource protection 
        and development.
    (b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (c) Eligible Projects.--
            (1) Certification.--A project shall be eligible for 
        financial assistance under this section only if the State 
        director for the project certifies to the Secretary that the 
        project will contribute to the protection and enhancement of 
        the quality or quantity of the New York City water supply.
            (2) Special consideration.--In certifying projects to the 
        Secretary, the State director shall give special consideration 
        to those projects implementing plans, agreements, and measures 
        which preserve and enhance the economic and social character of 
        the watershed communities.
            (3) Project descriptions.--Projects eligible for assistance 
        under this section shall include the following:
                    (A) Implementation of intergovernmental agreements 
                for coordinating regulatory and management 
                responsibilities.
                    (B) Acceleration of whole farm planning to 
                implement best management practices to maintain or 
                enhance water quality and to promote agricultural land 
                use.
                    (C) Acceleration of whole community planning to 
                promote intergovernmental cooperation in the regulation 
                and management of activities consistent with the goal 
                of maintaining or enhancing water quality.
                    (D) Natural resources stewardship on public and 
                private lands to promote land uses that preserve and 
                enhance the economic and social character of the 
                watershed communities and protect and enhance water 
                quality.
    (d) Local Cooperation Agreements.--Before providing assistance 
under this section, the Secretary shall enter into a cooperative 
agreement with the State director for the project to be carried out 
with such assistance.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--Total project costs under each local 
        cooperation agreement entered into under this section shall be 
        shared at 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for the reasonable 
        costs of design work completed by such interest prior to 
        entering into a local cooperation agreement with the Secretary 
        for a project. The Federal share may be in the form of grants 
        or reimbursements of project costs.
            (2) Interest.--In the event of delays in the reimbursement 
        of the non-Federal share of a project, the non-Federal interest 
        shall receive credit for reasonable interest to provide the 
        non-Federal share of a project's cost.
            (3) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
        Federal interest shall receive credit for lands, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward its share of project 
        costs, including direct costs associated with obtaining permits 
        necessary for the placement of such project on public owned or 
        controlled lands, but not to exceed 25 percent of total project 
        costs.
            (4) Operation and maintenance.--Operation and maintenance 
        costs for projects constructed with assistance provided under 
        this section shall be 100 percent non-Federal.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project carried out with assistance provided under 
this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2000, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out 
under this section, together with recommendations concerning whether 
such program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (h) New York City Watershed Defined.--For purposes of this section, 
the term ``New York City Watershed'' means the land area within the 
counties of Delaware, Greene, Schoharie, Ulster, Sullivan, Westchester, 
Putnam, and Dutchess which contributes water to the water supply system 
of New York City.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1994.

SEC. 339. NORTHEASTERN OHIO.

    The Secretary is authorized to provide technical assistance to 
local interests for planning the establishment of a regional water 
authority in northeastern Ohio to address the water problems of the 
region. The Federal share of the costs of such planning shall not 
exceed 75 percent.

SEC. 340. OHIO RIVER.

    (a) Center for Environmental Studies for Large Rivers.--The 
Secretary shall establish a Center for Environmental Studies of Large 
Rivers at Jefferson Technical College, Ohio.
    (b) Study.--
            (1) Cooperative agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into 
        a cooperative agreement with the Ohio River Valley Water 
        Sanitation Commission to develop the necessary methodologies to 
        make improvements in, and assess the environmental health of, 
        the Ohio River.
            (2) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1996, the 
        Secretary shall submit a report to Congress on the results of 
        the study conducted under paragraph (1), together with 
        recommendations on reducing and eliminating pollution in the 
        Ohio River.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1994, 
$2,000,000 to carry out subsection (a) and $1,000,000 to carry out 
subsection (b).

SEC. 341. REMOVAL OR REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS, MAHONING 
              RIVER, OHIO AND PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall remove or remediate contaminated sediments from 
the Mahoning River, Northeast Ohio and Western Pennsylvania, pursuant 
to section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1252 note).

SEC. 342. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

    The costs of measures undertaken to mitigate the adverse effects on 
fish and wildlife of water resources projects constructed by the 
Secretary within the McKenzie River Sub-Basin within the Columbia River 
Basin, Oregon, shall be allocated as provided in section 906 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283).

SEC. 343. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845-4847) is amended--
            (1) in the heading to subsection (c) by striking ``With 
        SARCD Council'';
            (2) in subsection (c) by inserting ``with State, regional, 
        and local officials, including, where applicable,'' after 
        ``consult'';
            (3) in subsection (d)(2)(A) by inserting ``, where 
        applicable,'' after ``Council'';
            (4) in subsection (g)(1) by striking ``$17,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$50,000,000''; and
            (5) in subsection (h)(2) by striking ``Bedford, Blair, 
        Cambria, Fulton, Huntingdon, and Somerset'' and inserting 
        ``Armstrong, Bedford, Blair, Cambria, Clearfield, Fayette, 
        Franklin, Fulton, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, Mifflin, 
        Somerset, Snyder, and Westmoreland''.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Section 313(d)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4846) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) Cost sharing.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Total project costs under each 
                local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
                subsection shall be shared at 75 percent Federal and 25 
                percent non-Federal. The non-Federal interest shall 
                receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
                completed by such interest prior to entering into a 
                local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a 
                project. The Federal share may be in the form of grants 
                or reimbursements of project costs.
                    ``(B) Interest.--In the event of delays in the 
                reimbursement of the non-Federal share of a project, 
                the non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest to provide the non-Federal share of 
                a project's cost.
                    ``(C) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward 
                its share of project costs, including direct costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
                placement of such project on public owned or controlled 
                lands, but not to exceed 25 percent of total project 
                costs.
                    ``(D) Operation and maintenance credit.--Operation 
                and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
                assistance provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent non-Federal.''.

SEC. 344. BROAD TOP REGION OF PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 304(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4840) is amended by striking ``$5,500,000'' and inserting 
``$11,000,000''.

SEC. 345. HOPPER DREDGE MCFARLAND.

    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary shall carry out a project 
at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Pennsylvania, to make modernization 
and efficiency improvements to the hopper dredge McFarland.
    (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the project under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall--
            (1) determine whether the McFarland should be returned to 
        active service or the reserve fleet after the project is 
        completed; and
            (2) establish minimum standards of dredging service to be 
        met in areas served by the McFarland while the drydocking is 
        taking place.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after Septem- ber 30, 1994.

SEC. 346. SEVEN POINTS VISITORS CENTER, RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall construct a visitors center 
and related public use facilities at the Seven Points Recreation Area 
at Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania, generally in accordance with the Master 
Plan Update (1994) for the Raystown Lake Project.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,500,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 347. BLACKSTONE RIVER VALLEY, RHODE ISLAND, AND MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with Federal, 
State, and local interests, shall provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance in the development and restoration of the Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor, Rhode Island, and 
Massachusetts.
    (b) Federal Share.--Funds made available under this section for 
planning and design of a project may not exceed 75 percent of the total 
cost of such planning and design.

SEC. 348. EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS CENTER OF EXPERTISE EXTENSION.

    The Secretary shall establish an extension of the Earthquake 
Preparedness Center of Expertise for the central United States at an 
existing district office of the Corps of Engineers near the New Madrid 
fault.

SEC. 349. MURFREESBORO, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for environmental 
enhancement, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, in accordance with the Report and 
Environmental Assessment, Black Fox, Murfree and Oaklands Spring 
Wetlands, Murfreesboro, Rutherford County, Tennessee, dated August 
1994.

SEC. 350. REPEAL OF TERMINATION DATE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF VIRGIN ISLANDS 
              PROJECTS BY THE SECRETARY.

    Section 406 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (48 
U.S.C. 1405c note) is amended by striking subsection (c).

SEC. 351. HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement under section 
218 of this Act with Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, to 
provide technical assistance to the Center for Environmental, 
Geotechnical and Applied Sciences.

SEC. 352. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Cost Sharing.--Section 340(c)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) Cost sharing.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Total project costs under each 
                local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
                subsection shall be shared at 75 percent Federal and 25 
                percent non-Federal. The non-Federal interest shall 
                receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
                completed by such interest prior to entering into a 
                local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a 
                project. The Federal share may be in the form of grants 
                or reimbursements of project costs.
                    ``(B) Interest.--In the event of delays in the 
                reimbursement of the non-Federal share of a project, 
                the non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest to provide the non-Federal share of 
                a project's cost.
                    ``(C) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward 
                its share of project costs, including direct costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
                placement of such project on public owned or controlled 
                lands, but not to exceed 25 percent of total project 
                costs.
                    ``(D) Operation and maintenance.--Operation and 
                maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
                assistance provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent non-Federal.''.
    (b) Funding.--Section 340(g) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$10,000,000''.

SEC. 353. REMOVAL OR REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS, LOWER FOX 
              RIVER, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall remove or remediate contaminated sediments from 
the Lower Fox River, Lake Winnebago to Green Bay, Wisconsin, pursuant 
to section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1252 note).

SEC. 353. SAVINGS CLAUSE.

    Nothing in section 204, section 207, or any other provision of this 
Act or any amendment made by this Act shall be construed to authorize 
the construction, operation, or maintenance of any dam, water conduit, 
reservoir, power house, transmission line, or other project works for 
which a license or exemption is required under the Federal Power Act. 
Nothing in such sections or any other provision of this Act or any 
amendment made by this Act shall by construed to affect the authority 
or jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission under the 
Federal Power Act or under any other provision of law.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.

HR 4460 RFS----2
HR 4460 RFS----3
HR 4460 RFS----4
HR 4460 RFS----5
HR 4460 RFS----6
HR 4460 RFS----7
HR 4460 RFS----8
HR 4460 RFS----9
```