alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 2010 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Lawrence A. Sala,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lawrence A. Sala
-------------------------------------
Lawrence A. Sala
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  October 29, 2010

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren,  Inc. and will be retained by Anaren,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 2010 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George A. Blanton, Sr.
Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ George A. Blanton
-------------------------------------
George A. Blanton
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial
  Officer and Treasurer

Date:  October 29, 2010

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren,  Inc. and will be retained by Anaren,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.815 Reports of annual employment. ( a ) Each common carrier licensee or permittee with 16 or more full time employees shall file with the Commission, on or before May 31 of each year, on FCC Form 395, an annual employment report.
( b ) A copy of every annual employment report filed by the licensee or permittee pursuant to the provisions herein; and copies of all exhibits, letters, and other documents filed as part thereof, all amendments thereto, all correspondence between the permittee or licensee and the Commission pertaining to the reports after they have been filed and all documents incorporated herein by reference are open for public inspection at the offices of the Commission.
( c ) *Cross references—* ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) *Applicability of cable television EEO reporting requirements for FSS facilities,* see § 25.601 of this chapter.
[35 FR 12894, Aug. 14, 1970, as amended at 36 FR 3119, Feb. 18, 1971; 58 FR 42249, Aug. 9, 1993; 69 FR 72026, Dec. 10, 2004]
070P16

#### State v. Nicolas Olivares Pineda

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-800)

1. Allowed 03/04/2016

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3.
# Comments on: 21-1826: VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC v. INTEL CORPORATION [OPINION], Precedential
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### §§ 1.1943-1.1949 [Reserved]
#### §§ 301-10.115-301-10.117 [Reserved]
Industrial Site(s) Controlled

by Otheis (Please note, we can only estimate what the exact

process is that Other

Industrial Sites use based on common

practice, We have no exact knowledge

of theirmethods) A Operations

Step 1 Pump

new chemical into vessel (approximately

1 kgper 330 gallon tote likely lost to incomplete

transfer. Typical procedures

are to rinse totes withwater and use that water in step 2, to reduce loss to environment

to less than 0.1 kg) B Operations

Step 2 Add appropriate

amount of water C Operations

Step 3 Add

propriatary

flocculant D Operations

Step 4 Packaging.

(gravity or pump fed into drums or 330 gallon totes E Operations

Step 5 Cleaning

of equipment:

Would estimate 5 to 10 lbs

of NCS lost to enviroment

per batch. Again bysaving the cleaning

water and using as water for next batch loss to enviroment

would be minimalized

to less than 0.1 kg.
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ Project No.: 0172.07.005.504 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1 _ of __1

_

Project Name: 304(m) Annual Review

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 3/17/2010 Time: 10:30 am EST

Company Name: DEC Region 3 Office

NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation Contact Name: John Sansalone

Phone No.: 845-256-3019

Name: Elizabeth Sabol Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : Flows reported to DMR in 2008



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I called DEC Region 3 Office on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 at 11:00 am to discuss DMR data submitted by Catskill State Fish Hatchery (NY0035327). I was directed to Adam Peterson, and I left him a message briefly describing the 304(m) project and how we obtain DMR data. Mr. Peterson returned my phone call later that day, and left a message asking me to return his call. I c alled him back on Thursday March 18, 2010 and left another message.

On Wednesday, March 24, 2010, I was able to reach Mr. Peters on and asked him about the flows at Catskill. He stated that he would look into the submitted reports and th e permit to confirm flow units and that he would get back to me by the end of the day.

On Friday, March 26, 2010, Mr. Peterson returned my phone ca ll and stated that I should contact John Sansalone, for information regarding the Catskill State Fish Hatchery facility. I called and left Mr. Sansal one a message on Friday at 1:30 pm, identifying myself and why I was contacting him.

Mr. Sansalone left me a message on Monday, March 29, 2010, at 11:30 am. I returned his call and had to leave another message. Mr. Sansalone left me a message on Tue sday, stating that he would be in the field and that I should contact him on Thursday.

I called Mr. Sansalone on Thursday, April 1, 2010, at 1:00 pm. W e briefly discussed Outfall 001 and the flows reported to DMR in 2008. He stated that this outfall is the main outfall and that he would contact the personnel responsible for reporting the flows. He asked that I sen d him an e-mail with the flow information currently provided in the database. I sent Mr. Sansalone the inform ation Thursday afternoon.

Mr. Sansalone left me a message on Monday, April 5, 2010, a nd 10:30 am stating that the flows reported to

DMR in 2008 had a units error. The flows should have been r eported in GPM, not MGD.
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATION



I, John C. Fanning, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of COMFORCE Corporation, hereby certify that:



1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in
this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: November 3, 2005



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ John C. Fanning                 
|John C. Fanning,                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



24
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.364 Testimony by speakerphone. ( a ) If all parties to the proceeding consent and the presiding officer approves, the testimony of a witness may be taken by speakerphone.
( b ) Documents used by the witness shall be made available to counsel by the party calling the witness in advance of the speakerphone testimony. The taking of testimony by speakerphone shall be subject to such other ground rules as the parties may agree upon.
[43 FR 33251, July 31, 1978]
September 16, 2015

Dear Mr. Olszowy:

This letter is to inform y ou that the following informati on is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-2660). This informati on is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture a nd Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove clos ed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information desc ribed above by 9/30/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
CONTINUED ON CHART 11363 CONTINUED ON RIGHT PANEL

i | n | l
- ~— ———__ 23 SPAT TEN,

STE COLLETTE BAYOU

"EXTENSION 3

Mercator Projection \ FIG 4s 17ft 4M "5"
Scale 1:20,000 at Lat. 29° 20’ \:4 Ra Ref

‘Soundings in the Mississippi River above Obstn PA®”:
the Head of Passes are referred to the
Low Water Reference Plane.

9 PLANE COORDINATE GRID = FIR 6s 174M "6" &
(based on NAD 1927) a .

Ra Ref
The Louisiana State Grid, south zone, is :
indicated by dashed ticks at 10,000 foot in- :
tervals thus: —+— \ / \
~The last three digits are omitted, \
a

FIR 4s 17ft 3M "4

CONTINUED ON CHART 11363

Jack Bay

FIG 25s 171M "13"
TNs?

Rui,
SF Oecine

vee, Sa Ober
S$

Grand Bay

SCALE 1:20,000
Nautical Miles

%
Statute Miles

%
Yards
1000
Meters
r

c
500

Carencro
Bay

erg

Yr

Alexis Bay

Obsin,

NOTE D
BAPTISTE COLLETTE BAYOU

The controlling depth in the bar channel was
4 feet for a width of 250 feet to 29°21'43'N,
89°18'08'W, thence 12 feet for a width of 125
feet to 29°20'00'N, 89°18'30"W, thence 14 feet
for a width of 150 feet to the junction with the

Mississippi River.
Apr 1997 - Sep 2005

is

o a
SOURCE DIAGRAM Ce —

The outlined areas represent the limits of the most recent hydrographic

survey information that has been evaluated for charting. Surveys have been

banded in this diagram by date and type of survey. Channels maintained

by the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers are periodically resurveyed and are
°

CONTINUED ON CHARTS 11361 AND 11364

not shown on this diagram. Refer to Chapter 1, United States Coast Pilot,

SOURCE

B3 1940-1969 NOS Surveys partial bottom coverage
B4 1900-1939 NOS Surveys partial bottom coverage
BS Pre-1900 NOS Surveys partial bottom coverage

Numbers shown after names of lights
indicate the distance in statute miles above
the "Head of Passes"

Venice

R“10A"

aT é FIRS
\ y

poo preety T T pa ToT

at 89° 20° CONTINUED ON CHART 11361 19°
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4322 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4322

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 1994

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Small Business Act to increase the authorization for the 
          development company program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LOANS.

    Section 20(i)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``$8,458,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$8,758,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``$1,200,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$1,500,000,000''.

SEC. 2. DISASTER LOAN PERSONNEL.

    Section 5(b)(8) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 634(b)(8)) is 
amended by striking the semicolon and inserting the following: ``: 
Provided, That the Administrator may extend the six-month limitation 
for an additional six months if the Administrator determines the 
extension is necessary to continue efficient disaster loan making 
activities;''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 24.129 Frequencies. The following frequencies are available for narrowband PCS: ( a ) Eighteen frequencies are available for assignment on a nationwide basis as follows: ( 1 ) Seven 50 kHz channels paired with 50 kHz channels: Channel 1: 940.00-940.05 and 901.00-901.05 MHz; Channel 2: 940.05-940.10 and 901.05-901.10 MHz; Channel 3: 940.10-940.15 and 901.10-901.15 MHz; Channel 4: 940.15-940.20 and 901.15-901.20 MHz; Channel 5: 940.20-940.25 and 901.20-901.25 MHz; Channel 19: 930.50-930.55 and 901.30-901.35 MHz; and Channel 20: 930.75-930.80 and 901.90-901.95 MHz.
( 2 ) Three 50 kHz channels paired with 12.5 kHz channels: Channel 6: 930.40-930.45 and 901.7500-901.7625 MHz; Channel 7: 930.45-930.50 and 901.7625-901.7750 MHz; and Channel 8: 940.75-940.80 and 901.7750-901.7875 MHz;
( 3 ) Two 50 kHz unpaired channels: Channel 9: RESERVED; Channel 10: 940.80-940.85 MHz; and Channel 11: 940.85-940.90 MHz.
( 4 ) One 100 kHz unpaired channel: Channel 18: 940.65-940.75 MHz.
( 5 ) Two 150 kHz channels paired with 50 kHz channels: Channel 21: 930.00-930.15 and 901.50-901.55 MHz; and Channel 22: 930.15-930.30 and 901.60-901.65 MHz.
( 6 ) Three 100 kHz channels paired with 50 kHz channels: Channel 23: 940.55-940.65 and 901.45-901.50 MHz; Channel 24: 940.30-940.40 and 901.55-901.60 MHz; and Channel 25: 940.45-940.55 and 901.85-901.90 MHz.
( b ) Five frequencies are available for assignment on a regional basis as follows: ( 1 ) One 50 kHz channel paired with 50 kHz channel: Channel 12: 940.25-940.30 and 901.25-901.30 MHz. Channel 13: RESERVED.
( 2 ) Four 50 kHz channels paired with 12.5 kHz channels: Channel 14: 930.55-930.60 and 901.7875-901.8000 MHz; Channel 15: 930.60-930.65 and 901.8000-901.8125 MHz; Channel 16: 930.65-930.70 and 901.8125-901.8250 MHz; and Channel 17: 930.70-930.75 and 901.8250-901.8375 MHz.
( c ) Seven frequencies are available for assignment on an MTA basis as follows: ( 1 ) Three 50 kHz unpaired channels: Channel 26: 901.35-901.40 MHz; Channel 27: 901.40-901.45 MHz; and Channel 28: 940.40-940.45 MHz.
( 2 ) One 50 kHz channel paired with 50 kHz channel: Channel 29: 930.80-930.85 and 901.95-902.00 MHz.
( 3 ) One 100 kHz channel paired with 50 kHz channel: Channel 30: 930.30-930.40 and 901.65-901.70 MHz.
( 4 ) One 150 kHz channel paired with 50 kHz channel: Channel 31: 930.85-931.00 and 901.7-901.75 MHz.
( 5 ) One 100 kHz channel paired with 12.5 kHz channel:
Channel 32: 940.90-941 and 901.8375-901.85 MHz.
Note to § 24.129 :
Operations in markets or portions of markets which border other countries, such as Canada and Mexico, will be subject to on-going coordination arrangements with neighboring countries.
[66 FR 29920, June 4, 2001]
#### WILLIAM H. DANNAT, as sole Surviving Member of the firm of DANNAT BROTHER, *v.*THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF NEW YORK.

*Board of education of New York*— has *not power to dram drafts upon the chamber*lain— *delivery of vouchers and certificate by.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to defendant’s answer.

The action was brought by the plaintiff, as assignee of a portion of the moneys falling due to one Dannat under a contract made by him for the erection of a school-house, to compel the defendant to draw its draft, payable to the order of the plaintiff upon the chamberlain of the city of New York, in pursuance of section 16 of chapter 386 of 1851. The defendant demurs on the ground that under the charter of 1873 money would no longer be paid out of the city treasury upon its draft, and that they were no longer required to draw one but simply to deliver a voucher and certificate to the comptroller, and that this had been done by it in this case. The court at General Term said:

“Under the provisions of chapter 386 of the Laws of 1851, the moneys raised for the board of education were placed in the city treasmy. In section 16 of the act it was provided that it should be drawn by the draft of the board of education upon the chamberlain. The moneys raised and appropriated were thus put under the direct control of the board of education. By chapter. 335 of the Laws of 1873 a finance department was created, at the head of which was the Comptroller, and the direct control of all *674moneys raised and appropriated was placed in that department, and it was provided that no moneys might be paid out of the city treasury but by warrants drawn by the comptroller and countersigned by the mayor, and that before any warrant could be drawn for the payment of any money a voucher of the amount must have been examined and allowed by the auditor, approved by the comptroller and filed in the department of finance. The Court of Appeals have held that the system thus created applied to all moneys to be paid out of the city treasury, and that the school moneys are not to be excluded therefrom. *(Darmat*v. *The Mmjor, etc.,*66 N. Y., 585; *People ex rel. Root*v. *Tappen,*67 id., 580.) In the latter case it was held that the chamberlain cannot pay moneys from the city treasury upon the warrant or draft of the president and secretary of the board of education.

In this state of the law all that is necessary, as it seems to us, on the part of the board of education, is to furnish, in proper form, a voucher for the action of the auditor and comptroller.”

*Francis Lynde Stetson,*for the appellant.

*G. G. King*and *John K. Hand,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.;

Daniels and Brady, JJ., concurred.

Judgment reversed, demurrer overruled with costs and with leave to the plaintiff to reply or to proceed with the trial of the issue of fact.
February 2, 1979

404 A.2d 1349

#### Commonwealth v. Booker, Appellant.

Submitted June 12, 1978.

Warren R. Hamilton, for appellant; Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

JACOBS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### REUBEN COMINS, Respondent, v. SAMUEL A. HETFIELD, Survivor of ISAAC B. CULVER, Deceased, Appellant.

*Testimony of party to action*— not *stricken out because of death of his adrersa/ry pending the suit.*

Appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on the report of a referee. The plaintiff was sworn before the referee, and testified to certain material facts. Before his examination was concluded the reference was adjourned, and thereafter Isaac B. Culver, defendant in the original action, died. Defendant’s counsel subsequently moved to strike out the evidence given by the plaintiff, on the ground that it related to a personal transaction with the deceased. This motion was denied. On appeal, the court at General Term said: *ee*The evidence of the plaintiff was properly taken by the referee and was wholly unobjectionable at the time it was taken. The subsequent death of defendant Culver would not justify the rejection of plaintiff’s evidence so taken *376before Culver’s death. It is not a case where the right of cross-examination of a witness has been lost by his misconduct, or by the fault of the party calling him. *(Forrest*v. *Hissam,*7 Ilill, 463.) The exception to the refusal to strike out such testimony was not well taken.”

*Hughes <3*Horthwp, for the appellant.

*H. A.*Pa/rmenter, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Loardman, J.;

Learned, P. J., and Lockes, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 302-9.400 When am I eligible for emergency storage of my POV? You are eligible for emergency storage of your POV when: ( a ) Your POV was transported to your post of duty at Government expense; and
( b ) The head of your agency determines that your post of duty is within a zone from which your immediate family and/or household goods should be evacuated.