alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 15.25 Kits. A TV interface device, including a cable system terminal device, which is marketed as a kit shall comply with the following requirements: ( a ) All parts necessary for the assembled device to comply with the technical requirements of this part must be supplied with the kit. No mechanism for adjustment that can cause operation in violation of the requirements of this part shall be made accessible to the builder.
( b ) At least two units of the kit shall be assembled in exact accordance with the instructions supplied with the product to be marketed. If all components required to fully complete the kit (other than those specified in paragraph (a) of this section that are needed for compliance with the technical provisions and must be included with the kit) are not normally furnished with the kit, assembly shall be made using the recommended components. The assembled units shall be certified or authorized under Supplier's Declaration of Conformity, as appropriate, pursuant to the requirements of this part. ( 1 ) The measurement data required for a TV interface device subject to certification shall be obtained for each of the two units and submitted with an application for certification pursuant to subpart J of part 2 of this chapter.
( 2 ) The measurement data required for a TV interface device subject to Supplier's Declaration of Conformity shall be obtained for the units tested and retained on file pursuant to the provisions of subpart J of part 2 of this chapter.
( c ) A copy of the exact instructions that will be provided for assembly of the device shall be submitted with an application for certification. Those parts that are not normally furnished shall be detailed in the application for certification.
( d ) In lieu of the label required by § 15.19, the following label, along with the label bearing the FCC identifier and other information specified in §§ 2.925 and 2.926, shall be included in the kit with instructions to the builder that it shall be attached to the completed kit: (Name of Grantee) (FCC Identifier) This device can be expected to comply with part 15 of the FCC Rules provided it is assembled in exact accordance with the instructions provided with this kit. Operation is subject to the following conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received including interference that may cause undesired operation.
( e ) For the purpose of this section, circuit boards used as repair parts for the replacement of electrically identical defective circuit boards are not considered to be kits.
[54 FR 17714, Apr. 25, 1989,as amended at 63 FR 36602, July 7, 1998; 82 FR 50830, Nov. 2, 2017]
#### § 24.713 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Atlas Minerals Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Gerald E. Davis,
President and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

     1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


By:             /s/ Gary E. Davis
                -----------------
                Gary E. Davis
                President and Chief Financial Officer
                August 13, 2003
# Comments on: 17-2490: VIRNETX INC. v. APPLE, INC. [OPINION], Precedential
# Comments on: 19-1952: KHAN v. HEMOSPHERE INC. [OPINION], Nonprecedential
§ 101.81 Future licensing in the 1850-1990 MHz, 2110-2150 MHz, and 2160-2200 MHz bands. After April 25, 1996, all major modifications and extensions to existing FMS systems in the 1850-1990 MHz, 2110-2150 MHz, and 2160-2200 MHz bands will be authorized on a secondary basis to ET systems. All other modifications will render the modified FMS license secondary to ET operations, unless the incumbent affirmatively justifies primary status and the incumbent FMS licensee establishes that the modification would not add to the relocation costs of ET licensees. Incumbent FMS licensees will maintain primary status for the following technical changes: ( a ) Decreases in power;
( b ) Minor changes (increases or decreases) in antenna height;
( c ) Minor location changes (up to two seconds);
( d ) Any data correction which does not involve a change in the location of an existing facility;
( e ) Reductions in authorized bandwidth;
( f ) Minor changes (increases or decreases) in structure height;
( g ) Changes (increases or decreases) in ground elevation that do not affect centerline height;
( h ) Minor equipment changes.
[61 FR 29695, June 12, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 12759, Mar. 18, 1997; 65 FR 38327, June 20, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 130 (Thursday, July 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16983]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 19, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. L.V. Ritter Trust No. 2, Marked Tree, Arkansas (E. Ritter 
Arnold, Marked Tree, Arkansas, and Daniel B. Hatzenbuehler, Memphis, 
Tennessee, as trustees); to retain voting shares of Marked Tree 
Bancshares, Inc., Marked Tree, Arkansas, and thereby indirectly retain 
voting shares of Marked Tree Bank, Marked Tree, Arkansas.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. The Testamentary Trusts A and B, Houston, Texas, and Constance 
M. Vickery, Houston, Texas, trustee; to retain voting shares of Texas 
Coastal Bank, Pasadena, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 29, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
 Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-16983 Filed 7-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**Exhibit 23(b)**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (File Numbers 333-33214, 333-47824, and 333-136863) of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. of our report relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. dated March 21, 2007,appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. As stated in our report, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the adjustments described in Note 3 and,accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. 

/s/ MALONEY+NOVOTNY LLC (formerly known as HAUSSER + TAYLOR LLC) 

Cleveland, Ohio 

March 25, 2008
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-1067

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM034AD

SBF100-33-023 --- 7/5/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

Below is a list of individuals who are eligible to serve on the Performance Review Boards for the Department of the Air Force in accordance with the Air Force Senior Executive Appraisal and Awards System. 

Secretariat 

Mr. Ronald L. Orr 

Maj Gen James E. Sherrard III 

Mr. Frank Tuck 

Mr. Gary M. Erickson 

Ms. Susan A. O'Neal 

Mr. Harlan G. Wilder 

Air Staff and “Others” 

Mr. William A. Davidson 

Mr. Gene L. Hathenbruck 

Maj Gen Larry Northington 

Mr. James C. Barone 

Ms. Mary Lou Keener 

Mr. Anthony J. DeLuca 

Air Force Materiel Command 

Lt Gen Charles Coolidge 

Maj Gen Claude Bolton 

Mr. Harry Schulte 

Dr. Donald Daniel 

Mr. Pat Zarokiewicz 

Janet A. Long, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-16453 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-U
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.336 Service of subpenas. ( a ) A subpena may be served by a United States marshal or his deputy, by Commission personnel, or by any person who is not a party to the proceeding and is not less than 18 years of age.
( b ) Service of a subpena upon the person named therein shall be made by exhibiting the original subpena to him, by reading the original subpena to him if he is unable to read, by delivering the duplicate subpena to him, and by tendering to him the fees for one day's attendance at the proceeding to which he is summoned and the mileage allowed by law. If the subpena is issued on behalf of the United States or an officer or agency thereof, attendance fees and mileage need not be tendered.
No. 10-11005.

#### Brown *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period September 30,
2006 (the "Report"), David J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, and President of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                     DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2006


                                     /S/ DAVID J. JOHNSON
                                     --------------------
                                     DAVID J. JOHNSON
                                     CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-5092.

#### Pecci *v.*Sloan, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 22.867 Effective radiated power limits. The effective radiated power (ERP) of ground and airborne stations operating on the frequency ranges listed in § 22.857 must not exceed the limits in this section. ( a ) The peak ERP of airborne mobile station transmitters must not exceed 12 Watts.
( b ) The peak ERP of ground station transmitters must not exceed 500 Watts.
[70 FR 19310, Apr. 13, 2005]
28 January 2016

309P15

#### State v. Reginald Underwood Fullard

1. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-93)

1.

2. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

2. Denied 01/13/2016
No. 11-5016.

#### Davila *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certio-rari denied.
No. 10-11274.

#### Verdugo *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 25.135 Licensing provisions for earth station networks in the non-voice, non-geostationary Mobile-Satellite Service. ( a ) Each applicant for a blanket earth station license in the non-voice, non-geostationary mobile-satellite service shall demonstrate that transceiver operations will not cause unacceptable interference to other authorized users of the spectrum, based on existing system information publicly available at the Commission at the time of filing, and will comply with operational conditions placed upon the systems with which they are to operate in accordance with § 25.142(b). This demonstration shall include a showing as to all the technical parameters, including duty cycle and power limits, under which the individual user transceivers will operate.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) Transceiver units in this service are authorized to communicate with and through U.S.-authorized space stations only.
[58 FR 68059, Dec. 23, 1993, as amended at 69 FR 5710, Feb. 6, 2004; 79 FR 8319, Feb. 12, 2014]
152P16

#### Catawba County, by and through its Child Support Agency, ex rel., Shawna Rackley v. Jason Loggins

1. Pit Catawba County’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-711)

1. Allowed 04/25/2016

2. Pit Catawba County’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.44 Separate pleadings for different requests. ( a ) Requests requiring action by the Commission shall not be combined in a pleading with requests for action by an administrative law judge or by any person or persons acting pursuant to delegated authority.
( b ) Requests requiring action by an administrative law judge shall not be combined in a pleading with requests for action by the Commission or by any person or persons acting pursuant to delegated authority.
( c ) Requests requiring action by any person or persons pursuant to delegated authority shall not be combined in a pleading with requests for action by any other person or persons acting pursuant to delegated authority.
( d ) Pleadings which combine requests in a manner prohibited by paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this section may be returned without consideration to the person who filed the pleading.
( e ) Any request to stay the effectiveness of any decision or order of the Commission shall be filed as a separate pleading. Any such request which is not filed as a separate pleading will not be considered by the Commission.
Note:
Matters which are acted on pursuant to delegated authority are set forth in subpart B of part 0 of this chapter. Matters acted on by the hearing examiner are set forth in § 0.341.
§ 211.1 Authority. ( a ) Authority to direct priorities for the restoration of communications services in national emergencies is vested in the President, including authority conferred by section 103 of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended (50 U.S.C. 404), section 101 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2070), section 201 of the Federal Civil Defense Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2281), section 1 of Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1958, as amended (3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 447), and section 606 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended. (47 U.S.C. 606).
( b ) Authority to develop plans policies, and procedures for the establishment of such restoration priorities has been delegated to the National Security Council, by Executive Orders 11051, 11490, and by the President's Memorandum of August 21, 1963 (28 FR 9413, 3 CFR part 858 (1959-63 comp.)), all as amended by Executive Order 12046, (FR 43, 13349 *et seq.*).
084P15-3

#### State v. Curtis Louis Sangster

1. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*(9 November 2015)

1. Dismissed

2. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*(16 November 2015)

2. Dismissed

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*(23 November 2015)

3. Denied ,11/25/2015

4. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*(3 December 2015)

4. Dismissed

5. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for Writ of Prohibition

5. Dismissed

6. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*(28 January 2016)

6. Dismissed
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.5


AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE 
EXECUTIVE CHANGE IN CONTROL TERMINATION AGREEMENT


This agreement (“Agreement”) between ENTEGRIS, INC., a Delaware corporation with headquarters offices at 129 Concord Road, Billerica, MA 01821, (“Entegris” or the “Company”) and William Shaner (the “Executive,” and together with the Company, the “Parties”) dated January 16, 2017 (the “Effective Date”).
RECITALS
		
	A.
	The Executive and the Company entered into an Executive Change in Control Termination Agreement as of February 24, 2010 (the “Original Agreement”).  


		
	B.
	The Executive continues to be employed by the Company as of the Effective Date.


		
	C.
	In recognition of a modification to the role and responsibilities of the Executive within the Company, the Executive and the Company wish to terminate the Original Agreement.


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, of the mutual promises of the Parties made herein and of other consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
		
	1.
	Effective as of the Effective Date, the Original Agreement is hereby terminated in its entirety and is of no further force and effect.


		
	2.
	The validity, interpretation, construction and enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware as applied to transactions taking place wholly within Delaware between Delaware residents. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
Entegris, Inc.                        Executive:


By: /s/ Christine A. Wilkinson                 /s/ William Shaner
Name:      Christine A. Wilkinson                William Shaner
Title:        HR Manager COS
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"18-1209: DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, LLC v. US [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Azg4X2IX0h\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-10-2018-18-1209-dyncorp-international-llc-v-us-opinion-nonprecedential-18-1209-opinion-12-10-2018\/\">18-1209: DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, LLC v. US [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-10-2018-18-1209-dyncorp-international-llc-v-us-opinion-nonprecedential-18-1209-opinion-12-10-2018\/embed\/#?secret=Azg4X2IX0h\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“18-1209: DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, LLC v. US [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Azg4X2IX0h\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, LLC v. US [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 18-1209 Origin: CFC Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Exhibit



Exhibit 10(e)6



ALLETE Executive Annual Incentive Plan
Form of Award
Effective 2017
[Eligible Executive Employees, except CEO]


Target Award Opportunity






	
		
	Base Salary
	$

	 
	 

	Times
	 

	 
	 

	Award Opportunity (percent of base salary)
	%

	 
	 

	Equals
	 

	 
	 

	Target Award 
	$






Performance Levels and Award Amounts




	
			
	Goal Performance Level
	Payout as Percent of 
Target Award
	Award Amount 

	Superior
	200% 
	$

	Target
	100% 
	$

	Threshold
	37.5% 
	$

	Below Threshold
	0% 
	$








Goals


	
									
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Goal

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Weighting

	 
	Financial Goals
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Net Income 
	25%

	 
	 
	Cash from Operating Activities
	 
	25%

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Strategic & Operational Positioning Goals
	 
	 
	 
	50%

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	100%






Compensation Subject to Compensation Recovery Policy


Annual Incentive Plan Compensation is subject to recoupment as defined in the Compensation Recovery policy.
§ 302-2.104 What information must we provide on the TA? On the TA, you must state the: ( a ) Specific allowances that the employee is authorized; and
( b ) Procedures that the employee is authorized to follow.