29096 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices 

149See George R. Smith, M.D., 78 FR 44972, 

44979–80 (2013); Glenn D. Krieger, M.D., 76 FR 

20020, 20024 (2011); David A. Hoxie, M.D., 69 FR 

51477, 51479 (2004); Maxicare Pharmacy, 61 FR 

27368, 27369 (1996). 

incorrectly represents that the only 

‘‘incident result’’ was that she 

‘‘voluntarily took [a continuing medical 

education] course on prescribing 

controlled substances from Vanderbilt 

University.’’ Gov’t Ex. 2, at 1–2. The 

Respondent’s explanation omits any 

reference to the multiple incidents 

where she ‘‘repeatedly’’ prescribed 

controlled substances to ‘‘numerous 

patients,’’ that she was assessed a 

$2,500.00 civil penalty, or that she 

received a five-year period of license 

probation with significant limitations, 

and reporting, monitoring, and notice 

requirements imposed as conditions of 

her probation. Gov’t Ex. 9, at 2–6. Even 

beyond the issue that the Respondent 

did not accept responsibility for these 

actions, as discussed, supra, the 

‘‘explanation’’ she included with her 

application lacked candor.149

Based on the present record, this 

applicant simply cannot be entrusted by 

DEA with a registration, and, for that 

reason, it is recommended that her 

application be DENIED. 

Dated: June 3, 2014. 

John J. Mulrooney, II, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge. 

[FR Doc. 2015–12135 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

Notice of Charter Reestablishment 

In accordance with the provisions of 

the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 

Title 5, United States Code, Appendix, 

and Title 41, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Section 101–6.1015, with 

the concurrence of the Attorney 

General, I have determined that the 

reestablishment of the Criminal Justice 

Information Services (CJIS) Advisory 

Policy Board (APB) is in the public 

interest. In connection with the 

performance of duties imposed upon the 

FBI by law, I hereby give notice of the 

reestablishment of the APB Charter. 

The APB provides me with general 

policy recommendations with respect to 

the philosophy, concept, and 

operational principles of the various 

criminal justice information systems 

managed by the FBI’s CJIS Division. 

The APB includes representatives 

from local and state criminal justice 

agencies; tribal law enforcement 

representatives; members of the judicial, 

prosecutorial, and correctional sectors 

of the criminal justice community, as 

well as one individual representing a 

national security agency; a 

representative of the National Crime 

Prevention and Privacy Compact 

Council; a representative of federal 

agencies participating in the CJIS 

Division Systems; and representatives of 

criminal justice professional 

associations (i.e., the American 

Probation and Parole Association; 

American Society of Crime Laboratory 

Directors; International Association of 

Chiefs of Police; National District 

Attorneys Association; National 

Sheriffs’ Association; Major Cities 

Chiefs Association; Major County 

Sheriffs’ Association; and a 

representative from a national 

professional association representing 

the courts or court administrators 

nominated by the Conference of Chief 

Justices). The Attorney General has 

granted me the authority to appoint all 

members to the APB. 

The APB functions solely as an 

advisory body in compliance with the 

provisions of the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act. The Charter has been 

filed in accordance with the provisions 

of the Act. 

Dated: May 11, 2015. 

James B. Comey, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 2015–12200 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Water 

Act and Resource Conservation and 

Recovery Act 

On May 14, 2015, the Department of 

Justice lodged a proposed Consent 

Decree with the United States District 

Court for the Central District of 

California in the lawsuit entitled United 

States v. Anaplex Corporation, Civil 

Action No. 2:15–CV–3615. 

The United States filed this lawsuit 

under the Clean Water Act and the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act. The United States’ complaint seeks 

injunctive relief and civil penalties for 

violations of regulations that govern 

discharges of pollutants to a publicly 

owned treatment works and the storage, 

disposal, and management of hazardous 

wastes at Anaplex’s electroplating 

facility in Paramount, California. The 

consent decree requires the defendant to 

undertake a rinsewater use evaluation, 

implement ongoing pollution 

monitoring, report on hazardous waste 

handling measures, and pay a $142,200 

civil penalty. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

Consent Decree. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and should refer to 

United States v. Anaplex Corporation, 

D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–1–1–10454. All 

comments must be submitted no later 

than thirty (30) days after the 

publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ–ENRD, P.O. Box 

7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the Consent Decree may be examined 

and downloaded at this Justice 

Department Web site: http://

www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. 

We will provide a paper copy of the 

Consent Decree upon written request 

and payment of reproduction costs. 

Please mail your request and payment 

to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ– 

ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $13.50 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. 

Henry Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2015–12115 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–CW–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of Labor-Management 

Standards 

Information Collection Request; 

Comment Request 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as 

part of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

conducts a preclearance consultation 

program to provide the general public 

and Federal agencies with an 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing collections of 

information in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices 29097 

1Pursuant to LMRDA Titles II and III, the 

Department also established nine other reporting 

and disclosure forms: The Form LM–1 Information 

Report; Form LM–10 Employer Report; Forms LM– 

15, 15–A, and 16 trusteeship reports; Form LM–20 

Agreement and Activities Report; Form LM–21 

Receipts and Disbursement Report; Form LM–30 

Officer and Employee Report; and Form S–1 Surety 

Report. 

2 In May 2011, EFS first became available for LM– 

3 and LM–4 filers, and those unions with fiscal 

years ending after June 30, 2011 began to take 

advantage of electronic filing. Prior to this 

implementation of EFS, few Form LM–3 and LM– 

4 unions utilized EFS, since they would be required 

to purchase a digital signature. As stated, EFS is 

free of charge. 

(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This 

program helps to ensure that requested 

data can be provided in the desired 

format, reporting burden (time and 

financial resources) is minimized, 

collection instruments are clearly 

understood, and the impact of collection 

requirements on respondents can be 

properly assessed. Currently, the Office 

of Labor-Management Standards 

(OLMS) of the Department of Labor 

(Department) is soliciting comments 

concerning the proposal to amend the 

information collection request 1245– 

0003, as well as the Form LM–2, LM– 

3, and LM–4 Labor Organization Annual 

Report instructions to require filers of 

such reports to submit the reports 

electronically, as well as modify the 

hardship exemption process for Form 

LM–2 filers. A copy of the proposed 

information collection request can be 

obtained by contacting the office listed 

below in the addresses section of this 

Notice. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted to the office listed in the 

addresses section below on or before 

July 20, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Andrew R. Davis, Chief of 

the Division of Interpretations and 

Standards, Office of Labor-Management 

Standards, U.S. Department of Labor, 

200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room N– 

5609, Washington, DC 20210, olmspublic@dol.gov, (202) 693–0123 (this is 

not a toll-free number), (800) 877–8339 

(TTY/TDD). 

Please use only one method of 

transmission (mail or submission via 

www.regulations.gov using RIN: 1245– 

AA06) to submit comments or to request 

a copy of this information collection 

and its supporting documentation; 

including a description of the likely 

respondents, proposed frequency of 

response, and estimated total burden. 

You may also request a copy of this 

information collection and its 

supporting documentation by sending 

an email to olms-public@dol.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Congress enacted the LaborManagement Reporting and Disclosure 

Act of 1959, as amended (LMRDA), to 

provide for the disclosure of 

information on the financial 

transactions and administrative 

practices of labor organizations. The 

statute also provides, under certain 

circumstances, for reporting by labor 

organization officers and employees, 

employers, labor relations consultants, 

and surety companies. Section 208 of 

the LMRDA authorizes the Secretary to 

issue rules and regulations prescribing 

the form of the required reports. The 

reporting provisions were devised to 

implement a basic tenet of the LMRDA: 

The guarantee of democratic procedures 

and safeguards within labor 

organizations, which are designed to 

protect the basic rights of union 

members. 

Pursuant to section 201 of the 

LMRDA, the Department established 

annual financial disclosure reports: the 

Form LM–2, LM–3, and LM–4. These 

reports detail the receipts, 

disbursements, assets, and liabilities of 

covered labor organizations during their 

previous fiscal year. The Form LM–2 is 

the most detailed report, for those labor 

organizations with $250,000 or more in 

total annual receipts. The Form LM–3 is 

available for those labor organizations 

with fewer than $250,000 in total 

annual receipts, and the Form LM–4 is 

available for those labor organizations 

with fewer than $10,000 in total annual 

receipts.1

Section 205 of the LMRDA provides 

that the reports are public information. 

Filers submit the reports to the 

Department’s Office of LaborManagement Standards (OLMS), 

pursuant to the OLMS Information 

Collection Request (ICR), OMB # 1245– 

0003 (Form LM–1, LM–2, LM–3, LM–4, 

Simplified Annual Report, LM–10, LM– 

15, LM–15A, LM–16, LM–20, LM–21, 

LM–30, and S–1). Currently, filers can 

submit the Forms LM–2, LM–3, LM–4, 

and LM–30 electronically through the 

OLMS free and web-based Electronic 

Forms System (EFS).2 EFS does not rely 

on third-party software or require the 

purchase of digital signatures; instead, 

EFS is a secure, web-based system that 

uses electronic signatures, which the 

filing organization’s two principal 

officers register for, along with the 

union, obtaining a personal 

identification number (PIN) each year. 

However, only Form LM–2 filers are 

currently required to use EFS, although 

the Form LM–2 instructions provide a 

temporary and continuing hardship 

exemption process. Form LM–3 and 

LM–4 filers, as well as Form LM–30 

filers, can choose instead to print off the 

completed form, sign manually, and 

mail the form to OLMS. 

In response to requests from union 

members, the media, members of 

Congress, and other interested parties 

for Internet access to reports filed by 

unions under the LMRDA, OLMS 

developed a Web site (http://

www.union-reports.dol.gov) where 

individuals may now view union 

annual financial reports and conduct 

data searches, displaying the results in 

a number of preformatted listings, free 

of charge. OLMS can instantaneously 

post reports submitted via EFS. Reports 

submitted via mail must be scanned and 

then posted, with certain data manually 

entered. 

Authority 

The legal authority for this notice is 

set forth in 35 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2), and 

sections 203 and 208 of the LMRDA, 29 

U.S.C. 432, 438. Section 208 of the 

LMRDA provides that the Secretary of 

Labor shall have authority to issue, 

amend, and rescind rules and 

regulations prescribing the form and 

publication of reports required to be 

filed under Title II of the Act and such 

other reasonable rules and regulations 

as he may find necessary to prevent the 

circumvention or evasion of the 

reporting requirements. 29 U.S.C. 438. 

The Secretary has delegated his 

authority under the LMRDA to the 

Director of the Office of LaborManagement Standards and permits redelegation of such authority. See 

Secretary’s Order 8–2009, 74 FR 58835 

(Nov. 13, 2009). 

Mandatory Electronic Filing of the 

Forms LM–3 and LM–4 

The Department seeks to amend ICR 

1245–0003, as well as the Forms LM–3 

and LM–4 instructions, to require 

mandatory electronic filing of these 

reports, as well as modify the Form LM– 

2 hardship exemption process to 

correspond with that proposed for the 

Form LM–3 and LM–4 reports, which 

would only permit temporary hardship 

exemption submissions, not continuing. 

The Department believes that reasonable 

changes must be made to the means by 

which the forms required under LMRDA 

Title II are filed. The most efficient way 

to provide meaningful access to this 

information by interested members of 

the public is to require that the reports 

filed by small and medium-sized labor 

organizations be filed in electronic form. 

This change will benefit the filers, 

union members, and the public, as well 

as the Department. 

First, EFS provides significant 

advantages for filers. Electronic forms 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

29098 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices 

3See 29 U.S.C. 794d(1)(A)(ii). 

can significantly reduce the burden for 

filing the Forms LM–3 and LM–4, 

because they pre-populate a significant 

amount of informational items and are 

more efficient for reporting entities. 

Further, EFS provides error-checking 

functionality, as well as online, contextsensitive help, which improves the 

completeness of the reporting. 

Moreover, a filer can easily acquire a 

PIN and password and submit the 

report, free of charge, removing the 

burden of printing, manually reviewing 

and signing, and then mailing. As 

detailed in its last ICR renewal for OMB 

#1245–0003, Form LM–3 filers will 

experience a reporting burden hour 

reduction from an estimated 52 hours to 

38.74 hours. With the existing, 

unchanged 64 recordkeeping burden 

hours, the total hour burden to complete 

the Form LM–3 is estimated to be 

102.74 hours, a reduction from the 

previous total of 116 hours. The 

estimated number of respondents per 

filer is unchanged, as the proposed 

changes only affect the method of filing, 

not the universe of filers. Most labor 

unions have the information technology 

resources and capacity to file 

electronically. Indeed, although no 

specific data exists regarding the extent 

to which unions have already embraced 

the technology necessary to provide 

reports in electronic form, in 2014, 

approximately 40% of Form LM–3 

unions and 37% of Form LM–4 unions 

filed their reports electronically. In any 

event, the Department has also proposed 

a process for a temporary hardship 

exemption, whereby filers may apply to 

temporarily submit paper forms, 

permitting additional time to complete 

the report electronically. 

Second, EFS offers numerous benefits 

for the public. In contrast to the 

efficiency of e-filing, paper reports must 

be scanned and processed for data entry 

before they can be posted online for 

disclosure, which delays their 

availability for public review. 

Mandatory e-filing would therefore 

result in more immediate availability of 

the reports on the OLMS public 

disclosure Web site, and improve the 

efficiency of OLMS in processing the 

reports and in reviewing them for 

reporting compliance. Mandatory efiling will also improve accessibility to 

the LM–3 and LM–4 forms for people 

with disabilities. Under Section 508 of 

the Rehabilitation Act, federal agencies 

must ensure that members of the public 

who are disabled and who are seeking 

information or services from a Federal 

agency ‘‘have access to and use of 

information and data that is comparable 

to the access to and use of the 

information and data by such members 

of the public who are not individuals 

with disabilities.’’ 3 Mandating 

electronic filing of the Forms LM–3 and 

LM–4 will help ensure that people with 

disabilities have access to those forms. 

Currently, hardcopy submissions of the 

Forms LM–3 and LM–4 must be 

scanned and converted to PDF format 

for posting on the OLMS public 

disclosure Web site. The scanned 

reports, which often contain handwritten entries and signatures, would 

then have to be further processed in 

order to be made Section 508 compliant. 

Considering the thousands of reports 

that are submitted manually every year, 

the process to make these reports fully 

accessible would be extremely timeconsuming and resource-intensive. 

Forms filed electronically will be easier 

and less costly to convert into a format 

that is accessible to people with 

disabilities and will facilitate 

compliance with Section 508. 

Third, mandatory e-filing will save 

the Department resources. Currently, 

only the Form LM–2 must be submitted 

to OLMS electronically, and there has 

been good compliance with this 

submission requirement. Requiring 

Form LM–3 and LM–4 reports to be 

filed electronically using a web-based 

system provided by OLMS and making 

the submitted reports available on the 

Web site will decrease the number of 

requests for reports that must be 

handled manually, freeing OLMS staff 

for other compliance assistance and 

enforcement work. Furthermore, 

electronic filing of Form LM–3 and LM– 

4 reports will enable OLMS to more 

efficiently sort, review, and analyze data 

that can be used more effectively for 

enforcement and compliance assistance 

purposes. 

Overview of Revised Form LM–3 and 

LM–4 Instructions 

Section IV (How to File), Form LM– 

2 and Form LM–3 Section XI 

(Completing Form LM–2 or LM–3), and 

Form LM–4 Section IX (Completing 

Form LM–4): The instructions in these 

sections will change to implement 

mandatory electronic filing. Mandatory 

electronic filing will minimize the 

burdens for unions that file the Forms 

LM–3 or LM–4, and increase efficiency 

for the Department of Labor as it 

processes the reports and makes the 

reports available to union members and 

the public. The web-based software will 

pre-populate certain data, perform many 

calculations, and help ensure the 

accuracy and completeness of the forms. 

A union will be permitted to file a paper 

format Form LM–3 or LM–4, however, 

if it claims a temporary hardship 

exemption. Such process will enable the 

filer to submit a paper report by the 

required due date, with an electronic 

report submitted within ten business 

days after their required due date. The 

hardship exemption procedures are 

modeled after the existing procedures 

used by Form LM–2 filers, although the 

Department proposes just a temporary 

hardship exemption, not a continuing 

hardship exemption, as Form LM–2 

filers have utilized. The Department 

notes that the continuing hardship 

exemption process derives from the 

Department’s initial electronic filing 

system, which was not web-based and 

required the purchase of a digital 

signature. The creation of EFS 

eliminated the problems and costs 

associated with the prior system, and 

the Department therefore does not 

consider the continuing hardship 

exemption portion of the process to be 

necessary. The Department therefore 

also proposes an amendment to the 

Form LM–2 instructions, eliminating 

the continuing portion of the hardship 

exemption process, leaving just the 

temporary hardship exemption. The 

temporary hardship exemption process 

is explained in the instructions to the 

forms that accompany this notice. The 

Department invites comments regarding 

any alternative procedures that might 

better address problems associated with 

mandatory electronic filing of the Forms 

LM–3 and LM–4. 

While no other changes to any other 

forms covered by this ICR are 

contemplated at this time, the agency 

seeks comments on any aspect of this 

information collection. Those comments 

will be used to revise and extend OMB 

authorization under the PRA for this 

information collection. 

II. Review Focus: The Department is 

particularly interested in comments 

which: 

* Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

* evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

* enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

* minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices 29099 

4The Department estimates that Form LM–3 and 

LM–4 filers will incur a one-time burden of one 

hour, in order to read the revised instructions and 

familiarize themselves with EFS. 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

III. Current Actions 

The Department seeks to revise this 

information collection to provide for 

electronic filing. The information 

collected by OLMS is used by union 

members to help self-govern their 

unions, by workers making decisions 

regarding their collective bargaining 

rights, by the general public, and as 

research material for both outside 

researchers and within the Department. 

The information is also used to assist 

the Department and other government 

agencies in detecting improper practices 

on the part of labor organizations, their 

officers and/or representatives, and is 

used by Congress in oversight and 

legislative functions. 

Burden Statement 

The Department does not anticipate 

any changes to its burden estimates, as 

provided in its most recent extension 

request for OMB #1245–0003.4 The only 

forms affected by this ICR amendment 

are the Forms LM–3 and LM–4. Further, 

none of the proposed changes affect the 

number of respondents. Rather, they 

would only affect the burden hours per 

respondent. Additionally, as stated in 

Part I, the Department already 

accounted for burden hour and cost 

savings, associated with EFS filing, in 

its last ICR revision, as it calculated the 

burden hour reduction associated with 

the 2011 implementation of EFS for 

Form LM–3 and LM–4 filers. Thus, the 

Department expects all filers to 

actualize the burden reductions 

anticipated in 2013, during the most 

recent ICR renewal, not just the 40% of 

Form LM–3 filers and 37% of Form LM– 

4 filers that currently take advantage of 

EFS. 

The total burden for the Labor 

Organization and Auxiliary Reports 

information collection is summarized as 

follows: 

Type of Review: Revision. 

Agency: DOL–OLMS. 

Title of Collection: Labor Organization 

and Auxiliary Reports. 

OMB Control Number: 1245–0003. 

Affected Public: Private Sector— 

businesses or other for-profits, farms, 

and not-for-profit institutions; and 

Individuals or Households. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Responses: 31,501. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden 

Hours: 4,582,392. 

Total Estimated Annual Other Costs 

Burden: $0. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

approval of the information collection 

request; they will also become a matter 

of public record. The Department notes 

that it has a pending rulemaking 

concerning two of the reports included 

in the Labor Organization and Auxiliary 

Reports information collection: The 

Form LM–10 Employer Report and the 

Form LM–20 Agreement and Activities 

Report filed by labor relations 

consultants. See 76 FR 37292. The 

Department received comments on 

those information collections during the 

rulemaking, and it will respond to such 

comments in any final rule issued, as 

well as in any separate request for 

amendment to the information 

collection submitted to OMB in the 

context of that rulemaking. 

Dated: May 14, 2015. 

Andrew R. Davis, 

Chief of the Division of Interpretations and 

Standards, Office of Labor-Management 

Standards, U.S. Department of Labor. 

[FR Doc. 2015–12272 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

[Docket No. OSHA–2015–0008] 

OSHA Training Institute (OTI) 

Education Center Prerequisite 

Verification Form; Request Office of 

Management and Budget’s (OMB) 

Approval of Information Collection 

(Paperwork) Requirements 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Request for public comments. 

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public 

comments concerning its proposal for 

completion of a Prerequisite Verification 

Form for applicants requesting 

enrollment in Outreach Training 

Program trainer courses to become an 

authorized Outreach Training Program 

trainer and the Office of Management 

and Budget’s (OMB) approval of the 

information collection requirements 

specified in the Outreach Training 

Program Requirements (dated February 

2013). 

DATES: Comments must be submitted 

(postmarked, sent, or received) by July 

20, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: 

Electronically: You may submit 

comments and attachments 

electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov, which is the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the 

instructions online for submitting 

comments. 

Facsimile: If your comments, 

including attachments, are not longer 

than 10 pages you may fax them to the 

OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. 

Mail, hand delivery, express mail, 

messenger, or courier service: When 

using this method, you must submit 

your comments and attachments to the 

OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. 

OSHA–2015–0008, Occupational Safety 

and Health Administration, U.S. 

Department of Labor, Room N–2625, 

200 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries 

(hand, express mail, messenger, and 

courier service) are accepted during the 

Department of Labor’s and Docket 

Office’s normal business hours, 8:15 

a.m. to 4:45 p.m., E.T. 

Instructions: All submissions must 

include the Agency name and the OSHA 

docket number (OSHA–2015–0008) for 

the Information Collection Request 

(ICR). All comments, including any 

personal information you provide, are 

placed in the public docket without 

change, and may be made available 

online at http://www.regulations.gov. 

For further information on submitting 

comments see the ‘‘Public 

Participation’’ heading in the section of 

this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. 

Docket: To read or download 

comments or other material in the 

docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov 

or the OSHA Docket Office at the 

address above. All documents in the 

docket (including this Federal Register 

notice) are listed in the http://

www.regulations.gov index; however, 

some information (e.g., copyrighted 

material) is not publicly available to 

read or download from the Web site. All 

submissions, including copyrighted 

material, are available for inspection 

and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. 

You may also contact Theda Kenney at 

the address below to obtain a copy of 

the ICR. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Theda Kenney or Todd Owen, 

Directorate of Standards and Guidance, 

OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room 

N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 

693–2222. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

The Department of Labor, as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES