### ~
AP-42 Section Reference IL Report Sect. Reference



# r 

# r - Nl r5 5 1 0~ 

# Kj 7, c.E-Nt862

5-7, t9q4


# wi5sT -To DAtc ) u-rm ;

.. 

## l r"~ 

# II,—{—UOcg



# /

## "EMISSIONS SURVEY CONDUCTED AT INTERSTATE BRICK

COMPANY, LOCATED IN WEST JORDAN UTAH"

CEM Suoervisor:


## J. Paul Benson

~ ~ ~ ~ 

### • - • 

## Greg E. Johnson


## Technicians: Ryan B. Benson Todd B. Benson Rick P. Hawkins JD Schiller David F. Hunt

December 5-7, 1994


# mmwm m

~ 

# FSra
~ 

## December 22, 1994 Pregared for: Mr. Jim Keck Interstate Brick Company 9780 South 5200 West West Jordan, Utah 84088-5689 Preoared by: Mr. V. Brent Benson, Technical Director American Environmental Testing, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

## CERT1FiCAT10N OF 

## REPORT INTEGRITY



## AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING COMPANY, INC. (AET) cerfifies: 1. That every effort was made to obtain accurate and representative data within the guidelines established by:
A. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Titie 40, Chapter I, Part 60, Appendix "A", Methods 1-5 inclusive, Method 6C, Method 7E, Method 13B and Method 201 A/202.
B. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems". 2. All of sampling and analysis performed for the compliance test reported herein. were carried out by myself or under my supervision.
3. The results obtained are accurate and auth nti .

r . Johnson J. Paul enson M thod 201 A Crew Supervisor Crew Supervisor I have reviewed all testing details and methods on which the results of this test are based. I find them to be accurate within the limits of the applicable methods.

V. Brent Benson Technical Director



# 3

## TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction 1 .1 Test Purpose

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.0 Summary of Results 2.1 PM Io Emissions 

# . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1.1 Table of PM y o Emissions Summary 

# - Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet 

# . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1.2 Table of PM j o Emissions Summary 

# - Primary Crusher Baghouse 

# . . . . . . . . 5 2.1. 3 Table of PM 1 o Emissions Summary. 

# - Line 3 Baghouse. 

# . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.4 Table of PM 1 o Emissions Summary

-Line 4 Baghouse 

# . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2 S0 2 Emissions . . . . . . . . . . .. 2.2.1 S0 2 Emissions Summary Table

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet .... 2.2.2 S0 2 Emissions Summary Table

- Tunnei Kiln No. 4 Inlet .... 2.2.3 S0 2 Emissions Summary Table

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet ....
2.3 NO X Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.1 NO X Emissions Summary `fable

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet. .... 2.3.2 NOx Emissions Summary Table

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet .... 2.3.3 NOx Emissions Summary Table . . . . . 6

. . . . . 7

. . . . . 7

. . . . . 8

. . . . . 8

. . . . . 8

. . . . . 9 - Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet . . . . . . . . . 9
2.4 Visible Emissions Opacity 

# . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.4.1 Summary Table of Visible Emissions 

# - Tunnel Kiln No. 4 

# . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.4.2 Summary Table of Visible Emissions 

# - Primary Crusher Baghouse 

# . . . . . . . . 11 2.4.3 Summary Table of Visible Emissions 

# - Line 3 Baghouse. 

# . . . . . . . . . . . 11 

# y

## 2.4.4 Summary Table of Visible Emissions - Line 4 Baghouse. . . . .

. . . . . . . 1 2 '
2.5 HF Emissions

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.5.1 HF Emissions Summary Table

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet . . .

. . . . . . 1.2 3.0 Source Operation 3.1 General Plant Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.0 Sampling and Analysis Procedures 4.1 Emissions Testing



# . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4.1.1 Figure of Stack Diagram



# - Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet Stack

....... 15 4.1.2 Table of Traverse Point Calculations



# - Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet



# . . . . . . . . . 16 4.1.3 Figure of Stack Diagram



# - Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet Stack

...... 17 4.1.4 Table' of Traverse Point Calculations



# - Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet



# . . . . . . . . . 18 4.1.5 Figure of Stack Diagram



# - Primary Crusher Baghouse Stack.

..... 19 4.1.6 Table of Traverse Point Calculations



# - Primary Crusher Baghouse



# . . . . . . . . 20 4.1.7 Figure of Stack Diagram



# - Line 3 Baghouse Stack



# . . . . . . . . . 21 4.1.8 Tab(e of Traverse Point Calculations



# - Line 3 Baghouse.



# . . . . . . ^

. . . . 22 4.1.9 Figure of Stack Diagram



# - Line 4 Baghouse Stack



# . . . . . . . . . 24 4.1.10 Table of Traverse Point Calculations



# - Line 4 Baghouse.



# . . . . . . . . . . .. 25 4.1.11 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data



# - Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet



# . . . . . . . . . 26 4.1.12 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data



# - Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet 

# & Outlet

...... 27 4.1.13 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data



# - Primary Crusher Baghouse



# . . . . . . . . 28 4.1.14 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data



# - Line 3 Baghouse.



# . . . . . . . . . . . 29 4.1.15 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data



# - Line 4 Baghouse.



# . . . . . . . . . . . 30

## 4.1.16 

## Summary Table of Calculated Resuits

- 

## Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet

. . . . . . . . . 

## 32 4.1.17 

## Summary Table of Calculated Results -Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet & 

## Outlet

...... 33 4.1.18 Summary Table of Calculated Results

- 

## Primary Crusher Baghouse

. . . . . . . . 

## 34 4.1.19 Summary Table of Calculated Results

- 

## Line 3 Baghouse.

. . . . . . . . . . . 

## 35 4.1.20 Summary Table of Calculated Results

- 

## Line 4 Baghouse.

. . . . . . . . . . . 

## 36 4.1. 21 Figure of EPA Method 5 Sample Train ..... 3 7 - 4.1. 22 CEM 

## Sample Train.

. . . . . . . . . . . 

## 39

APPENDICES


## A. Approval Order B. AET Pretest Protocol C. Production Data D. Field & Laboratory Data E. , Emissions Calculations F. Data-Logger Sheets G. AET CEM Readings H. VEO Readings & Certification Cards 1. Calibration Data 

# I

# "EMISSIONS SURVEY CONDUCTED AT INTERSTATE BRICK

COMPANY, LOCATED IN WEST JORDAN UTAH"

1.o Introduction

~ 

## At the request of Interstate Bricic Company's, Mr. Jim Keck, American Environmental Testing, Inc., (AET) conducted a series of Emissions Testing for PM1 0 , sulfur dioxide (S0 2 ), nitrogen oxides 

## (NO X ) and Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) at Interstate Bricic Company's West Jordan Facility. These tests were accomplished during the period of, December 5-7, 1994. The individuai sources and the emissions that were quantified are listed below:

Source


## Tunnel Kiln No . 3 Inlet Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet Primary Crusher Baghouse Line 3 Baghouse Line 4 Baghouse S0 2 and NO X S0 2 and NO X PM i 0 , S0

2 , NO X & HF PM 1 o PM 1 o PM10 

## On October 27, 1994, The Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) issued the Interstate Brick Company an "Approval Order" for their West Jordan Facility. A copy of the permit is attached as Appendix "A". In the permit, conditions were established for various pollutants emission levels and criteria were set for testing to verify compliance with these limitations. The UDEQ set the following emission limits from the "Approval Order" for each source:

- 1

-

### So- 

## ur

- 

## c -e Pollutant Emission Limitation 

## Tunnel Kiln No. 3 S0 2 17.0 Ibs/hr

( 

## I n let) NO X 1.8 Ibs/hr
Tunnel Kiln No. 4 S0 2 17.0 Ibs/hr (Inlet) NO X 1.8 Ibs/hr
Tunnel Kiln No. 4 PM 10 12.3 Ibs/hr (Outlet) S0 2 51.0 Ibs/hr NO X 2.6 Ibs/hr F-F 5.7 Ibs/hr Primary Crusher Baghouse PM 10 0.49 Ibs/hr 0.016 gr/dscf Line 3 Baghouse PM 10 0.37 Ibs/hr 

## 0.016 gr/dscf Line 4 Baghouse PM 10 0.67 Ibs/hr 

## 0.016 gr/dscf On the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet, AET found liquid droplets in the gas stream at the sample port location. Because of these. conditions, AET tested using EPA Method 5 and 202 to quantify Particulate emissions (considering all particulate captured to be PM 10 ). Mr. Keck, requested that American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. prepare a"Pretest Protocol" to submit to the UDEO outlining the required tests. The protocol, without the calibration data is presented in Appendix "B". AET performed Compliance Emissions Testing as ' set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Chapter I, Part 60, Appendix "A". The following methods were used to conduct the emissions testing:

Method 1 -"Sample and Velocity Traverses for

Stationary Sources"

## Method 2 - " Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (type "S" pitot tube)"
Method 3 -"Gas Analysis for Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen, Excess Air and Dry Molecular Weight"
Method 4 -"Determination of Moisture Content in



## Stack Gases"
Method 5 -"Determination of Particulate Emissions

and Back-half Condensibles from Stationary Sources"
Method 6C -"Determination of Sulfur Dioxide

Emissions from Stationary Sources" (Instrumental Analyzer Procedures)
Method 7E -"Determination of Nitrogen Oxides

Emissions from Stationary Sources" 

## (Instrumental Analyzer Procedures)
Method 13B -"Determination of Hydrofluoric Acid

from Stationary Sources"
Method 201 A -"Determination of PM I p Emissions from

Stationary Sources"
Method 202 - "Determination of Condensible



## Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources"

-

~ 

## - 

# a

### Table 2.1.2 

## (PM, o Emissions Summary) Primary Crusher Baahouse



## Test Run DSCF

Collected Emissions Rates

Lbs/hr gr/dscf
1 2 3 23.48

22.86 23.10 0.06

0.06 0.06 0.0033

0.0032 0.0035

- 

## Average = 

## 23.15 0.06 0.0033
The average measured PM j p emission concentration for the Primary Crusher Baghouse was 0.06 Ibs/hr, which is 12.24% of the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling of 0.49 Ibs/hr and 0.0033 gr/dscf, which is 20.63% of the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling of 0.016 gr/dscf.

Table 2.1.3



## (PM 1 a Emissions Summary)
Line 

# 3 Baghouse



## Test Run DSCF

Collected Emissions Rates

Lbs/hr gr/dscf
1 2 3 20.53

20.80 ' 

## 20.53 0.11

0.07 0.05 0.0039

0.0026 0.0020 Average = 

## 20.62 0.08 0.0028

_C_

### 2.0 

## Summary of Results

2.1 p1V M Emissions



## (EPA 201A)


## The emissions data accumulated for P M I o emissions during the December 5-7 1994 Compliance Testing is summarized in the following tables for each source:
Table 2.1.1 Tunnel Kiln No. 4- Outlet Table 2.1.2 Primary Crusher Baghouse Table 2.1.3 Line 3 Baghouse Table 2.1.4 Line 4 Baghouse

Table 2.1.1 

## (PM 1 a Emissions Summary)
Tunnel Kiln No. 4- Outlet



## Test Run DSCF

Collected Emissions Rates

Ibs/hr gr/dscf
1 2 3 36.5016

39.4402 40.3321 6.0273

8.7407 11.4822 0.0188

0.0258 0.0330 Average = 38.7580 8.7501 0.0259 

## The average measured PM 1 p emission concentration for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet was 8.7501 Ibs/hr, which is 71.14% of the UDEO permitted allowable ceiling of 12.3 Ibs/hr.



# _d_ / ~

## u The average measured P M 10 emission concentration for the Line 3 Baghouse was 0.08 Ibs/hr, which is 21.62% of the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling of 0.37 Ibs/hr and 0.0028 gr/dscf, which is 17.5% of the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling of 0.016 gr/dscf.

Table 2.1.4 

## (PM 1 o Emissions Summary) Line 4 Baghouse



## Test Run DSCF

Collected Emissions Rates

Lbs/hr gr/dscf
1 .2 3 23.33

21.81 22.05 0.08

0.04 0.06 0.0060

0.0029 0.0041 Average 

## = 22.40 0.06 0.0043

The average measured P M i o emission concentration for the Line 4 Baghouse was 0.06 Ibs/hr, which is 8.96% of the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling of 0.67 Ibs/hr and 0.0043 gr/dscf, which is 26.88% of the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling of 0.016 gr/dscf. 2.2 ,SQ Z Emissions



## (EPA 6C)
The emissions data accumulated for S0 2 emissions during the December 7, 1994 Compliance Emissions Testing is summarized in Table 2.2.1 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet, Table 2.2.2 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet and Table 2.2.3 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 l Outlet.



## _r,_ 

# /oL

### Table 2.2.1 

## (S0 2 Emissions Summary)
Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet



## Test Run Emissions Rates

ppm Ibs/hr
1 2 3 600.39

593.00 547.71 385.42

276.69 258.90 Average = 580.37 306.94

Table 2.2.2 

## (S0 2 Emissions Summary)
Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet



## Test Run Emissions Rates

ppm Ibs/hr
1 2 3 211.33

137.62 181.92 78.096

54.205 73.744 Average = 176.96 68.682

-7- 

# /.3

### Tabie 2.2.3 

## (S0 2 Emissions Summary)
Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet


## Test Run Emissions Rates

ppm Ibs/hr

. 1 2 3 

# 1

35.56

25.52 29.36 13.156

10.290 12.018 Average 30.15 11.821 The average measured S0 2 emission concentration for the Tunnel 

## Kiln No. 4 Outlet was 11.821 Ibs/hr, which is 23.18% of the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling of 51.0 Ibs/hr.
2.3 NO), Emissions



## (EPA 7E)
The emissions data accumulated for NO X emissions during the 

## December 7, 1994 Compliance Emissions Testing is summarized in Table 2.3.1 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet, Table 2.3.2 for the Tunnel Ki(n No. 4 Inlet and Table 2.3.3 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet.
Table 2.3.1



## (NO X Emissions Summary)
Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet


## Test Run Emissions Rates

ppm I b s/ h r
1 2 3 31.30

32.44 39.84 14.75

15.36 19.08 Average = 34.53 76.40

### Table 2.3.2 

## (NO X Emissions Summary)
Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet


## Test Run Emissions Rates

ppm I bs/h r
1 2 3 13.32

10.52 8.45 3.318

2.851 2.402 Average = 10.76 2.857

Tabie 2.3.3 

## (NO X Emissions Summary)
Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet


## Test Run Emissions Rates

ppm 1 b s/ h r
1 2 3 12.07

10.52 8.45 3.069

2.851 2.402 Average = 10.35 2.774 

# The average measured NO X emission concentration for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet was 2.77 Ibs/hr, which is 106.7% of the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling of 2.6 Ibs/hr.

9 

# ~~

## 2.4 Visible Emission Opacity (VE)



## VEO's were taken simultaneously with each of the EPA Method 201 A runs on the Primary Crusher & Line 3& 4 Baghouses and each of the EPA Method 6C & 7E runs on the Tunnel Kilns 3& 4. Averages for the three (3) runs are listed in the following tables for each source:
Table 2.4.1 - Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet Tabie 2.4.2 - Primary Crusher Baghouse Table 2.4.3 - Line 3 Baghouse Table 2.4.4 - Line 4 Baghouse

Table 2.4.1 

## (Visible Emissions Opacity Summary)
Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet



## Test Number %VEO
1 4.58 2 5.83 3 1.88 Average = 4.10%

The average VEO reading of 4.10% for this source was well below the allowable UDEO ceiling level of < 20%.

## ... Table 2.4.2 (Visible Emissions Opacity Summary) Primary Crusher Baghouse

Test Number %VEO
1 0.00 2 0.00 3 0.00 Average 

# = 0.00%
The average VEO reading of 0.00% for this source was well below the allowable UDEQ ceiling level of 5 10%.

Table 2.4.3 

## (Visible Emissions Opacity Summary)

Line 3 Baqhouse



## Test Number %VEO
1 0.00 2 0.00 3 0.00 Average 

# = 0.00%

The average VEO reading of 0.00% for this source was well below the allowable UDEQ ceiling level of <_ 10%.

-11- 

# i'l

## Table 2.4.4 

## (Visible Emissions Opacity Summary) Line 4 Baghouse



## Test Number %VEO
1 

## 0.00 2 0.00 3 0.00 Average = 

## 0.00%
The average VEO reading of 0.00% for this source was well below the allowable UDEO ceiling level of 5 10%.
2.5 HF Emissions



## (EPA 1313) 

## The emissions data accumulated for HF emissions during the December 5, 1994 Compliance Emissions Testing on the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet is summarized in Table 2.5.1.

Table 2.5.1 

## (HF Emissions Summary)
Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet



## Test Run Emissions Rates

Ibs/hr gr/dscf
1 2 3 2.4571

.1.8806 2.0247 0.0077

0.0056 0.0058 Average 2.1208 0.0064

-17- 

# Ir

## The average measured HF emission concentration for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet was 2.1208 Ibs/hr, which is 37.21 % of the UDEO permitted allowable ceiling of 5.7 Ibs/hr.

3.0 

## Source Operations
3.1 General Plant Operations 

## The manufacture of brick and related products such as clay pipe, pottery and some types of refractory brick involves the mining, grinding, screening and blending of the raw materials, and the forming, cutting or shaping, drying or curing, and firing of the final product. Surface clays and shales are mined in open pits. Most fine clays are found underground. After mining, the material is crushed to remove stones and is stirred before it passes onto screens for segregation by particle size. To start the forming process, clay is mixed with water, usually in a pug mill. The three principal processes for forming brick are stiff mud, soft mud and dry press. In the stiff mud process, sufficient water is added to give the clay plasticity, and bricks are formed by forcing the clay through a die. Wire is used in separating bricks. All structural tile and most and most brick are formed by this process. The soft mud process is usually used with clay too wet for the stiff mud process. The clay is mixed with water to a moisture content of 20 to 30 percent, and the bricks are formed in molds. In the dry press process, clay is mixed with a small amount of water and formed in steel molds by applying pressure of 500 to 1500 pounds per square inch. Wet clay units that have been formed are almost completely dried before firing, usually with waste heat from kiins. Many types of kilns are used for firing brick, but the most common are the downdraft periodic kiln and the tunnel kiln. The periodic kiln is a permanent brick structure with a number of fireholes where fuel enters the furnace. Hot gases from the fuel are drawn up over the bricks, down through then by underground flues, and out of the oven to the chimney. Although lower heat recovery makes this

-13- ) 

# qi



## type less efficient than the tunnel kiln, the uniform temperature

distribution leads to a good quality product. Production Data during the testing period was given to AET by Interstate Brick Company and is attached as Appendix "C".

4.0 Sampling and Analysis Procedures


## 4.1Emissions Testing 

## A. EPA Method 1; sample and velocity traverses for stationary sources. Figure 4.1.1 is a diagram of the Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet Stack. This reference method requires the tester, due to stack geometry, to sample for particulate and velocity at twenty (20) separate locations in the stack, five (5) per traverse, in four (4) separate ports. The location of these points relative to the stack are given in Table 4.1.2. Figure 4.1.3 is a diagram of the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet Stack. This reference method requires the tester, due to stackgeometry, to sample for particulate and velocity at twentyfive (25) separate locations in the stack, five (5) per traverse, in five (5) separate ports. The location of these points relative to the stack are given in Table 4.1.4. Figure 4.1.5 is a diagram of the Primary Crusher Baghouse Stack. The reference methods require the tester, due to the stack geometry, to sample for. particulate and velocity at ' twelve (12) separate locations in the stack, six (6) per traverse, on diameter lines 90 0apart from one another. The location of these points relative to the stack are given in Table 4.1.6. Figure 4.1.7 is a diagram of the Line 3 Baghouse Stack. The reference methods require the tester, due to the stack geometry, to sample for particulate and velocity at twelve (12) separate locations in the stack, six (6) per traverse, on diameter lines 90 10 apart from one another. The location of these points relative to the stack are given in Table 4.1.8.

-14- cql

### Interstate Brick Company 

### No. 3 Kiln Inlet
Figure 4.1.1



# ~

4-

A= 251' = 5.23 Diameters B= 120" = 2.5 Diameters



# _1 q_ A)

### 5 10 15 20

. . . .



### 4 9 14 19■ .■ .



### 3 8 13 18

. . . .



### 2 7 12 17

. . . .



### 1 6 11 16

. . .■ 

### 48" 

### Interstate Bricic Company
No. 3 Kiln Inlet


## Tabte 4.1.2

48"



# u k6 k6 k6

Sample Ports are 15" Long



### Sample Point Distance from outside of Port 1,6,11,16 19.8" = 19 3a4" 2, 7, 12, 17 29.4" = 29 3/8" 3, 8, 13, 18 39.0" = 39" 4, 9, 14, 19 48.6" = 48 5I8" 5, 10, 15, 20 58.2" = 58 1 !4"

_ , G .~

### 120'

p = 523" = 4.35 D

6=366"=3.04D' 

## Interstate Brick Company Mo. 4 Kiln Outlet
F igure 4.1.3

120.5"

- 1 rh

### 5 10 15 20 25



## . . •
. .

4 9 14 19 24■■ .■■



### 3 8 13 18 23■ • •■ •



### 2 7 12 17 22 •■ • '■ •



## 1 6 11 16 21

. . . . . 120" 

### Interstate Brick Company
No. 4 Kiln Outlet
Table 4.1.4

120.5"



## 16 16 k6
~ 

## 6 16

Sample Ports are 15.75" Long

Sample Poi nt Distance from outside of Port 1,6,11,16&21 27.75" = 27 3l4" 2, 7, 12, 17 & 22 51.75" = 51 3l4" 3, 8, 13, 18 & 23 75.75" = 75 3/4" 4,9, 14, 19&24 99.75" = 99 3I4" 5, 10, 15, 20 & 25 123.75" = 123 3l4"



# ~ a~

## Interstate Brick Company Primary Crusher Baghouse



## F.i gure 4.1.5

12.0" 

# .T

B = 24" = 2.0 Diametere

A=96"=8.ODiametero

, n 1 

## ~AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drfve 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

TRAVERSE POINT CALCULATIONS

•

_ - = =. •..•-.

. ~ . ~ . .. -,•. -...-. . .= =--

~ ••

_

, •_ • ,c . . ti ._ .

... • _. - ~



# ... • ,. _ ~

. . 0

. 785 t

. _ t_,.



### Traverse Percent of Stacfc I.D. Product of Distance Traverse Point Point Stadc I.D. inches col. 2&3 Y Location from Number (to 1/8 in) outside of ports (sum of columns 4 & 5) 1& 7 4.4 12 0.528 3.75 4.278 = 4 1/4" 2&. 8 14.6 12 1.752 3.75 5.502 = 5 1/2" 3& 9 29.6 12 3.552 3.75 7.302 = 7 1/4" 4& 10 70.4 12 8.448 3.75 12.198 = 12 114" 5& 11 85.4 12 10.248 3.75 13.990 a 14.0" 6& 12 95.6 12 11.472 3.75 15.222 = 15 1/4"



## -20- (:: 

# ~ 6

## Interstate Brick Company Li ne 3 Baghouse Figure 4.1.7
18.?5"

B = 36" = 1.92 Diameters

A= 1 13" = 6.03 DiametersAMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Bin:h Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

i=• -
TRAVERSE POINT CALCULATIONS

~

~

~
~
❑
~ r•tz•Tr,r-

~~~ ii • • ,
~ [:[ ~ •. , • -.. - ~



### Traverse Point Number



### 1&7 2&8 3&9 4 & 10 5&11 6 & 12 Percent of Stack I.D. Product of Distance

Stadc I.D. inches col. 2 &3 Y (to 1/8 in)

4.4 18.75 0.825 3.75 14.6 18.75 2.7375 3.75 29.6 18.75 5.55 3.75 70.4 18.75 13.2 3.75 85.4 18.75 16.0125 3.75 95.6 18.75 17.925 3.75 Traverse Point Location from outside of ports (sum of columns 4 & 5) 4.575 = 4 5/8" 6.488 a 6 1 /2" 9.3=91/4' 16.95 = 17' 

### 19.763 = 19 3/4' 21.675 = 21 5/8'



### ' ,,

## Figure 4.1.9 is a diagram of Line 4 Baghouse Stack. The

reference methods require the tester, due to the stack geometry, to sample for particulate and velocity at twelve (12) separate locations in the stack, six (6) per traverse, on diameter lines 90 11 apart from one another. The location of these points relative to the stack are given in Table 4.1.10.
B. EPA Method 3; for gas analysis of carbon dioxide, oxygen, excess air, and dry molecular weight. This reference method requires that a gas sample be extracted from the stack for analysis concurrently with each of the runs. The integrated gas sample is then analyzed via an orsat for carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and oxygen. The nitrogen value is obtained by difference. Results from these determinations are included in Appendix "D" with the ' field and laboratory data forms for each individual so 

# u rce. C. EPA Method 2, 5, 201 A& 202 Combined; for the determination of velocity, particulate matter, PM 1 o emissions/back-half condensibles and volumetric flow rate from stationary sources. To evaluate compliance with the PM 1 o limitation specified in the "Approval Order", AET had to test using methodology consistent with the above referenced methods. Data from the three (3) separate runs, which constitute a single compliance test, are summarized in the following tables for each source:
Table 4.1.11 Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet Table 4.1.12 Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet & 

## Outlet Table 4.1.13 Primary Crusher Baghouse Table 4.1.14 Line 3 Baghouse Table 4.1.15 Line 4 Baghouse The original laboratory and field data accumulated at the test site are presented in Appendix "D". Orsat and laboratory weight forms are hand written on site as the data is generated.

_7'Z_ 

# 2

## Interstate Brick Company Li ne 4 Baghouse Fi gure 4_ 1.9
18.?5"

B = 14" = 0.75 Diameters

A = 100" = 5.33 Diameters



# 3d

~ .

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

Table 4.1.10

TRAVERSE POINT CALCUL.ATIONS


# ._~ _

. - - 

# _~ "

iL 

# ~ := •u•,u

.~ .. . ._ _. ~•~ .- -. ~ . _

... . -.. - ~ .:

... . . ~ .

. : ~ . , ~ -,•



### Traverse Pen:ent of Stack I.D. Product of Distance Traverse Point Point Stadc I.D. inches col. 2&3 Y Location from Number (to 1/8 in) outside of ports (sum of columns 4 & 5) 1& 7 4.4 18.75 0.825 4 4.825 = 4 7/8" 2& 8 14.6 18.75 2.7375 4 6.738 = 6 9/4" 3& 9 29.6 18.75 5.55 4 9.55 = 9 1/2" 4& 10 70.4 18.75 13.2 4 17.20 = 17 1/4" 5& 11 85.4 18.75 16.0125 4 20.013 = 20.0 ' 6& 12 95.6 18.75 17.925 4 21.925 = 21 7/8"



### —25— e3 I

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

TABLE 4.1.11 (FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY)

Plant: Interstate Brick Comoanv Source: Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet EPA Method 4

Units Date: 126/94

Svmbol Descriotion Test #1 Test #2 Test #3

Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 30.289 30.289 30.289

sampled @ meter Iso 27.775 27.775 27.775 conditions Pb Barometric Pres 'Hg abs 25.42 25.42 25.42 OH Average Pres 'H20 1.2 1.2 1.2

drop across the orifice meter Tm Average gas °R 539.45 539.45 539.45

meter temp °F 79.45 79.45 79.45 r Meter Coefficient 0.917 0.917 0.917 Vw Total H20 ml 49.1 49.1 49.1

collected, impingers 

### & silica gel CO2 % 3.4 3.4 3.4 02 % 14.8 14.8 14.8 N2+C0 % 81.8 81.8 81.8 Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.502 0.502 0.502 Ts Stack Temp °R 881.5 882.5 884.5 °F 421.5 422.5 424.5 Sqr rt AP Velocity head 'H20 1.8165 1.8369 1.8645



### of stack gas Cp Pitot Tube 0.8429 0.8429 0.8429

Coefricient Ps Static Pres 'H20 -0.18 -0.18 -0.18 Pabs Absolute Pres 'Hg 25.41 25.41 25.41 As Area stack Ft2 15.999 15.999 15.999

Stack in inches 54.16 54.16 54.16 Tt Net time min. 40 40 40

of test

-26- 

## ~ "

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

TABLE 4.1.12 

### (FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY)

Plant: Interstate Brick ComRanv Source: Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet & Outlet EPA 5/202 & 138 Iyoe: Method

Test #2 Date: 12/5194
Symbol Descriotion Units Test #1 Test #3

Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 48.187 52.536 54.383

sampled @ meter Iso 44.187 48.176 49.869 conditions Pb Barometric Pre: "Hg abs 25.3 25.2 25.22 AH Average Pres "H20 0.9141 0.9844 1.0423

drop across the orifice meter Tm Average gas °R 540.48 543.2 550.3

meter temp °F 80.48 83.2 90.3 Yi Meter Coeffcient 0.917 0.917 0.917 Vw Total H20 ml 128.5 123.8 121.4

collected, impingers & silica gel CO2 % 2.23 2.47 2.47 02 % 16.9 16.8 16.7 N2 + CO % 80.87 80.73 80.83 Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.501 0.501 0.501 Ts Stadc Temp °R 585.16 583.92 581.2 °F 125.16 123.92 121.2 Sqr rt AP Velocity head "H20 0.1441 0.1502 0.1534

of stadc gas Cp Pitot Tube 0.8401 0.8401 0.8401

Coefficient Ps Static Pres "H20 0.01 0.01 0.01 Pabs Absoiute Pres 'Hg 25.30 25.20 25.22 As Area stack Ft2 100.420 100.420 100.420

Stack in inches 135.69 135.69 135.69 Tt Net time min. 75 75 75

of test Mgp Particulate Mg Total 44.4 66 86.2

HF Mg Total 18.1 14.2 15.2



### -27- 

## ~3~AMEFiICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

TABLE 4.1.13

Plant: Interstate Source: Primarv I,yoe: EPA Method

(FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY)
Brick Comganv Crusher Bagbouse 201 A- PM10 Emissiorts Date: 1216/94
Sylnbol

Vm Descriotion

Volume dry gas Units
Ft3 Test #1

28.79 Test #2

28.65 Test #3

28.98 sampled @ meter Iso 28.732 28.593 28.922 conditions Pb Barometric Prea "Hg abs 25.23 25.23 25.23 AH Average Pres "H20 0.557 0.557 0.557

drop acnoss the orifice meter Tm Average gas °R 544.67 556.54 557.29

meter temp °F 84.67 96.54 97.29 Yi Meter Coefficient 0.998 0.998 0.998 Vw Total H20 mi 22 19.1 15.7

collected, impingers & silica gel CO2 % 0.1 0.1 0.1 02 % 20.8 20.8 20.8 N2 + CO % 79.1 79.1 79.1 Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.135 0.135 0.135 Ts Stacic Temp °R 505.08 509.83 511.33 °F 45.08 49.83 51.33 Sqr rt AP Velocity head "H20 0.865 0.8622 0.8622

of stadc gas

, Cp Pitot Tube 0.8394 0.8394 0.8394 Coefficient Ps Stadc Pres "H20 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 Pabs Absolute Pres "Hg 25.12 25.12 25.12 As Area stack Ft2 0.785 0.785 0.785

Stack in inches 12 12 12 Tt Net time min. 60 59.25 60

of test Mgp Mg Total 5 4.7 5.3



# _,Q_ 

# ,0AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

TABLE 4.1.14

P1ant: Interstate (FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY)

Brick Comoanv Baghouse 201A

- PM10 Emissions Source: Line 3 jyoe: EPA Method Date: 1215/94

Units Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Symbol Descril2tion

Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 22.008 22.586 22.169

sampled @ meter Iso 23.879 24.506 24.053 conditions Pb Barometric Pre: 'Hg abs 25.32 25.3 25.26 aFl Average Pres 'H20 0.5661 0.5615 0.5505

drop across the orifice meter Tm Average gas °R 519.54 525.92 522.04

meter temp °F 59.54 65.92 62.04 Yi Meter Coefficient 1.085 1.085 1.085 Vw Total H20 ml 8.9 6.5 6.5

collected, impingers & silica gel CO2 % 0.2 0.2 o.2 02 % 20.5 20.5 20.5 N2 + CO % 79.3 79.3 79.3 Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.183 0.183 0.183 Ts Stack Temp °R 519.83 515.42 510.25 °F 59.83 55.42 50.25 Sqr rt AP Velocity head 'H20 0.5497 0.5602 0.5359

of stadc gas Cp Pitot Tube 0.8414 0.8414 0.8414

Coefficient Ps Static Pres 'H20 -9 -9 -9 Pabs Absolute Pnes 'Hg 24.66 24.64 24.60 As Area stack Ft2 1.917 1.917 1.917

Stack in inches 18.75 18.75 18.75 Tt Net time min. 54.75 56 53.5

of test Mgp Mg Total 5.2 3.5 2.7

-29-

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660


### TABLE 4.1.15 (F1ELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY)

..■

. ~~_ 

### ,_ _•.• - •._
_ „_, .. • -, ~ 

### • •• •.

Symbol Description Units Test #1 Test #2 Test #3


### Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 28.25 26.81 27.36

sampled @ meter Iso 28.194 26.756 27.305 conditions Pb Barometric Pres "Hg abs 25.31 25.31 25.31 aH Average Pres 0 

### 1420 0.56 0.56 0.56

drop across the orifice meter Tm Average gas °R 539.54 547.67 552.88

meter temp °F 79.54 87.67 92.88 Yi Meter Coefficient 0.998 0.998 0.998 Vw Total H20 ml 30.5 15.8 23.4

collected, impingers & silica gel CO2 % 0.1 0.1 0.1 

### 02 % 20.8 20.8 20.8 N2 + CO % 79.1 79.1 79.1 Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.216 0.216 0.216 Ts Stacic Temp °R 503.5 502.5 501.92 °F 43.5 42.5 41.92 Sqr rt AP Velocity head "H20 0.2872 0.2626 0.2681

of stacic gas Cp Pitot Tube 0.8394 0.8394 0.8394

Coefficient Ps Static Pres "H20 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 Pabs Absoiute Pres "Hg 25.31 25.31 25.31 As Area stacic Ft2 1.917 1.917 1.917

Stacic in inches 18.75 18.75 18.75 Tt Net time min. 59.75 57.25 57.25

of test Mgp Mg Total 9 4.1 5.9



## -';n - ,3 

## ~ 2

## Particulate (PM 10 ) and velocity measurements, required in the

applicable reference methods, are generated in the field by computer. These forms are also included in Appendix "D" for each of the three (3) runs that comprise a compliance test.Compliance criteria is calculated using computer and handwritten field forms and are summarized in the following tables for each source:
Table 4.1.16 Table 4.1.17 Table 4.1.18 Table 4.1.19 Table 4.1.20 Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet & Outlet Primary Crusher Baghouse Line 3 Baghouse Line 4 Baghouse A copy of the example calculations are attached as Appendix "E" Figure 4.1.21 is a schematic of the samp(e train used to obtain the field data. A stainless steel probe liner was used for the testing. The glass fiber filters used in the train are 99.95% efficient on 0.3 micron particles and have no organic binders (Andersen P-3710). These filters are tared before use and after the test to determine particulate loading. Filter weights and particulate in the acetone washes of the glassware and probe ahead of the filter constitute the total particulate catch. The probe and filter are kept at 248°F ± 25 0 during sampling. Moisture in the stack gases is coliected by keeping the impingers in the sample train below 68°F with an ice bath. The "back-half" of the moisture sampling train contained the following impingers: Impinger Number Contents Amount Parameter Collected
1 Deionized Water 100 ml Moisture 2 Deionized Water 100 ml Moisture 3 Empty

- - - - - - - 

## Moisture 4 Silica Gel @200 g Moisture Prior to doing the EPA Method 5 and 201 A/202 tests, AET ran a pretest cyclonic flow determination in the exhaust stacks per

-31- 

# 3?

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Foric, Utah 84660
TABLE 4.1.16 

### (CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA)

. .= ~ 

### _ 

# A A_

~ 

### •_= u - ~ 

### . .

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.5794 0.5794 0.5794

sampled @ standani dscf 23.177 23.177 23.177 Conditions Vw gas Volume water scf 2.311 2.311 2.311

vapor coitected @ standard conditions Bws Proportion by 0.091 0.091 0.091



### volume of water vapor in gas stream dimensionless Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 29.136 29.136 29.136

weight Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.126 28.126 28.126

weight Vs Stacic gas ft/sec 145.382 147.093 149.4789

velocity as Volumetric flow ft3/hr 3.8727 3.9139 3.9684

rate dry basis x E+06 x E+06 x E+06 standard conditions



## -32- "



## ~ g,AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

TABLE 4.1.17 (CALCULATED COMPLIANCE 

### CRITERIA)



# •

_ 

# .._ .. • 

# ._ •
_



# .. _

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.4867 0.5259 0.5378

sampled 

# @ standard dscf 36.5016 39.4402 40.3321 Conditions Vw gas Volume water scf 6.0485 5.8273 5.7143

vapor collected 

# @ standard conditions Bws Proportion by 0.1421 0.1287 0.1241

volume of water vapor in gas stream dimensionless Md Dry molecular Ib/lb mo(e 29.0328 29.0672 29.0632

weight Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 27.4645 27.6425 27.6903

weight Vs Stack gas ft/sec 9.4985 9.8765 10.0498

velocity Qs Volumetric flow ft3/hr 2.2476 2.3693 2.4369

rate dry basis x E+06 x E+06 x E+06 standard conditions Iso Isokinetic 

# % 95.527 97.9395 97.3883

variation

-33- 1? 

## 91

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

TABLE 4.1.18 

### (CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA)



# . .. ~ 

# _ -•••
_

.__ „_ •.. • -,~ • ~~ •.

94 

### Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.3913 0.3858 0.3850

sampled @ standard dscf 23.48 22.86 23.1 Conditions Vw gas

. Volume water scf 1.04 0.9 0.74

vapor collected @ standard canditions Bws Proportion by 0.04 0.04 0.03

volume of water vapor in gas stream dimensionless Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.848 28.848 28.848

weight Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.631 28.631 28.631

weight Vs Stack gas ft/sec 52.24 52.27 52.28

velocity as Volumetric flow ft3/hr 1.2409 1.2357 1.2411

rate dry basis x E+05 x E+05 x E+05 standard conditions Iso Isokinetic % 150.18 148.7 147.72



### variation D50 Sampling cut rate 9.613 9.7539 9.8353

~ 

# {D

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

### Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

TABLE 4.1.19 (CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA)

•_=
_ „- •.. • -„ • •• •.

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.3750 0.3714 0.3837

sampled @ standard dscf 20.53 20.8 20.53 Conditions Vw gas Volume water scf 0.42 0.31 0.31

vapor collected @ 

### standard conditions Bws Proportion by 0.02 0.01 0.01



### volume of water 

### vapor in gas stream dimensionless Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.852 28.852 28.852

weight Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.635 28.635 28.635

weight Vs Stack gas ft/sec 33.92 34.41 32.78

velocity Qs Volumetric flow ft3/hr 1.921 1.9745 1.8964

rate dry basis x E+05 x E+05 x E+05 standard conditions Iso Isokinetic % 12118 118.69 127.71



### variation D50 Sampling cut rate 10.0326 10.1464 9.8995



### -35- 

# ~ `AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

TABLE 4.1.20 (CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CFtITERIA) 

## - _.. Mrs _

•~ 

# - _ u:

~.. ~ - ~ ~ ~~ 

# . •.

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.3905 0.3810 0.3852

sampled @ standard dscf 23.33 21.81 2205 Conditions 

### Vw gas Volume water scf 1.44 0.74 1.1

vapor collected @ standard conditions Bws Proportion by 0.06 0.03 0.05

volume of water vapor in gas stream dimensionless Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.848 28.848 28.848

weight Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.631 28.631 28.631

weight Vs Stack gas fUsec 17.31 15.73 16.09

velocity Qs Volumetric flow ft3/hr 9.9819 9.3346 9.4149

rate dry basis x E+04 x E+04 x E+04 

### standard conditions (so Isokinetic % 177.17 184.91 185.32



### variation D50 Sampling cut rate 9.5171 9.9198 9.7058

— z r 4

### OC W F W

~ O 

## S OL 

# W

_ N

T 

## N r

~

~ L

~

~ LL. 

### C

~ i H


## m 

# E aa N Q T

~ N 

## v

~ Z
~
~

~ 

# a a W 

### d

~ 

# x t' 

## ~ `



### OL 

# W ~ J 0

_ ~ 

# W W

~ 

# J W

d 

# . _ ~
~ O

~

~ 

# W

m 

# } ~

~ ~ O N~



### -37-

## Field VEO forms and the readers current certification cards are included as Appendix "I". F. EPA Method 13B for the determination of hydrofluoric acid (HF) 

## emissions from stationary sources as specified in Federal and State regulations. 

# Particulate and gaseous hydrofluoric acid are extracted from the stack isokinetically using a modified EPA Method 5 sample train. Total fluoride is determined on the filter, probe and 

## prefilter glassware and in the back-half impinger water using a specific ion electrode.

5.0 

## Quality Control/Quality Assurance
5.1 Comoliance Testing 

## Specific items used in the EPA approved sample trains require pretest and post-test calibrations. The frequency of the 

## calibrations and guidelines for procedural items are delineated in the EPA's "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems". For EPA Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 13B 201 A/202 inclusive the quality 

## assurance guidelines are intended to insure that the PM 1 a , S0 2 , NO X and HF emissions are quantified in a manner consistent with the most stringent sampling criteria possible. AET testing 

## personnel are thoroughly trained in all aspects of the EPA required QA/QC guidelines. The crew supervisor has certified at the front of this report that the test crew adhered to those 

## guidelines in the regulations applicable to the compliance testing at Interstate Brick Company's West Jordan, Facility. There were no deviations from prescribed methodology reported by the supervisor.
Calibrations for the sample nozzle, pitot tube, thermocouples, 

## orifice, ' filter balance and dry gas meter used to extract the sample at an isokinetic rate of 100% ± 10.0% or a D 50 rate of 10.0 ± 1.0 are attached as Appendix "J".

-40- 

# ~~

## The main quality criteria that AET is required to fulfill for the

P M 1 a emissions testing is as follows:

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet 

## 1. Isokinetic Sampling Rate = 100 ± 10.0%
AET Run Number Sampling Rate
1 95.5270 2 97.9395 3 97.3883 

## Average = 96.9516 2. Samplirng Volume => 31.8 DSCF
AET Run Number Sample Volume (DSCF)
1 36.5016 2. 39.4402 3 40.3321 Average = 38.7580 

## AII of the - compliance test quality assurance criteria was achieved for this set of tests.

Primarv Crusher Bagh __ouse


## 1. D 50 Cut Rate = 10.0 t 1.0%
AET Run Number 

## Sampling Rate
1 9.6130 2 9.7539 3 9.8353 

## Average = 9.7341

-~~- ~~

## 2. Filter Temperature = 248 t 25 (°F)
AET Run Number Filter Temperature (°F)
1 245.75° 2 246.75° 3 248.83° Average = 247.11 ° F AII of the compliance test quality assurance criteria was achieved for this set of tests.

1. D 50 Cut Rate = 10.0 ± 1.0%
AET Run Number
1 2 3 Average = Sampling Rate
10.0326 10.1464 9.8995
10.0262 2. Filter' Temperature = 248 ± 25 (°F)
AET Run Number Filter Temperature (°F)
1 249.58° 2 251.00° 3 249.17° Average = 249.92° F AII of the compliance test quality assurance criteria was achieved for this set of tests.

-42- 

# db

### Line 4 Baqhouse


## 1. D 50 Cut Rate = 10.0 ± 1.0%
AET Run Number Sampling Rate
1 9.5171 2 9.9198 3 9.7058 Average = 9.7142 2. Filter Temperature = 248 ± 25 (°F)
AET Run Number Filter Temperature (°F)
1 265.25° 2 252.92° 3 247.92° Average = 255.36° F AII of the compliance test quality assurance criteria was achieved for this set of tests. The CEM sample train was also leak checked prior to testing the Enterprise Engines. The standards used for these tests conformed to EPA "Protocol 1" quality. Those certifications are included in Appendix "J". The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Method 7E requires that the following items are met:

-43- 

# 217

## Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet



## 1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 300 PPm:

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NOx). AET had a zero gas of purified N 2that was < 0.1 ppm NOx. b. Mid-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span value. AET's mid-level calibration gas was 159.9 ppm, which was in the acceptable range.

c. High-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span value. AET's high-level calibration gas was 259.6 which was in the acceptable range. The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "J". 2. Measurement System Performance Specifications During the NOx tests AET's measurement system is required to meet the following criteria:

a. Zero drift < to 3.0% of the span value. It was met for these tests.
b. Calibration drift <_ 3.0% of the span value.
It was met for these tests.

c. Calibration bias error has to be 5 5.0% of the calibration gas value.

## AET met this condition for the tests. These results are included in Appendix "J".

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet 

## 1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 300 PPm:

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NOx). 

## AET had a zero gas of purified N 2that was < 0.1 ppm NOx.
b. Mid-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span 

## value. AET's mid-level calibration gas was 159.9 ppm, which was in the acceptable range.

c. High-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span value. AET's high-level calibration gas was 259.6 which was in the acceptable range. The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "J". 

## 2. Measurement System Performance Specifications During the NOx tests AETs measurement system is required to meet the following criteria: a. Zero drift <_ to 3.0% of the span value.
It was met for these tests.

-45- 

# ~~

## b. Calibration drift <_ 3.0% of the span value.
It was met for these tests.



## c. Calibration bias error has to be 5 5.0% of the calibration gas value.
AET met this condition for the tests. These results are included in Appendix "J".

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlel 

## 1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 300 Ppm:

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NOx). 

## AET had a zero gas of purified N 2that was < 0.1 ppm NOx.
b. Mid-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span value. AET's mid-level calibration gas was 159.9 ppm, which was in the

- acceptable range.

c. High-level calibration gas with

- a nitrogen oxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span value. AET's high-level calibration gas was 259.6 which was in the acceptable range. The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "J". 2. Measurement System Performance Specifications During the NOx tests AETs measurement system is required to meet the following criteria:

-46-



## .~~

## a. Zero drift 5 

## to 3.0% of the span value.


## It was met for these tests.
b. Calibration drift 5 

## 3.0% of the span value.


## It was met for these tests.

c. Calibration bias error has to be 5 

## 5.0% of the calibration 

## gas value.
AET met this condition for the tests. These results are included in Appendix "J". The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Method 6C requires that the following items are met:

Tunnel Kiln No. 3 

## 1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 1000 ppm:

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). AET had a zero gas of purified N 2 that was < 0.1 ppm S02.


## b. Mid-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span value. AET's mid-level calibration gas was 514.6 ppm, which was in the acceptable range.

c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span value. AET's high-level calibration gas was 901.6 which was in the acceptable range.

-47- 

# 151

## The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "J". 2. Measurement System Performance Specifications During the S02 tests AET's measurement system is required to meet the following criteria:

a. Zero drift 5 to 3.0% of the span value.
It was met for these tests. 

## b. Calibration drift 5 3.0% of the span value.
It was met for these tests.



## c. Calibration bias error has to be s 5.0% of the calibration gas value.
AET met this condition for the tests. These results are included in Appendix "J".

Tunnel Kiln. No. 4 Inlet 

## 1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 300 PPm:

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). 

## AET had a zero gas of purified N 2that was < 0.1 ppm S02.
b. Mid-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to .40 to 60 percent of the span value. AET's mid-level calibration gas was 163.5 ppm, which was in the acceptable range.

-48- 

# ~~

## c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span value. AET's high-level calibration gas was 260.7 which was in the acceptable range. The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "J". 2. Measurement System Performance Specifications During the S02 tests AET's measurement system is required to meet the following criteria:

a. Zero drift <_ to 3.0% of the span value.
It was met for these tests. 

## b. Calibration drift. _< 3.0% of the span value.
It was met fo r these tests.



## c. Calibration bias error has to be <_ 5.0% of the calibration gas value.
AET met - this condition for the tests. These results are included in Appendix "J".

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet 

## 1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide in nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 300 PPm: 

## a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). 

## AET had a zero gas of purified N 2 that was < 0.1 ppm S02.

-49- 

## c~~

## b. Mid-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span value. AET's mid-level calibration gas was 163.5 ppm, which was in the acceptable range.

c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span 

## value. AET's high-level calibration gas was 260.7 which was in the acceptabfe range. The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in Appendix "J". 2. Measurement System Performance Specifications During the S02 tests AETs measurement system is required to meet the following criteria: a Zero drift <_ to 3.0% of the span value.
It was met for these tests.


## b. Calibration drift _< 3.0% of the span value.
It was met for these tests.



## c. Calibration bias error has to be 5 5.0% of the calibration 

# gas value.
AET met this condition for the tests. These results are included in Appendix "J".



# ,o y ~

# Appendix "A" 

# (Approval Order)

agrnrsican Envfxon,nrnEaf gestuzg eom #any ffnc.
cRcno, dVevada 

### gl' rocrslx, c4:i.zona csaa -fju 

### ei.Ey, 2Lta{

~ 

### z 

### 702-786-8113 6o2- 253-3354 80t- 266- 7m

# STATE OF UTAH

Department of Environmental Quality

Division of Air Quality
INTENT TO APPROVE TU XNEL KILN #4

Prepared By: Nando Meli, Engineer

1► 

## II y oleo off

- MU u : • I 51IN103 1 0

.1 m C DAQE-947-94 Date: October 27, 1994
Source 

# INTERSTATE BRICK COMPANY

Russell A. Roberts Executive Secretary Utah Air Quality Board



# ~~

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 2 

### Abstract Interstate Brick is required by the PM„ SIP to reduce S0 1 emissions to meet Reasonable Available Control Technology (RACT). The Apprnval Order contains new emissfon lhnitations which have been determined to meet RACT. Interstate Brick has also proposed an increase in, fluoride emissfons for Kiln #4, the only kiln which had a fluoride emission limit. Modeling of overall fluoride emissions has been performed which demonstrates compliance with the threshold limit values set for , fluoride. Corresponding 'emission limits for fluoride from each kiln are contained in the Approval Order. Prevlously unidentyEed emissions 

### from existfng baghouses, whfch 

### have been determined to meet Best Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements, are contained in the Approval Orrter with 

### associated emission/operating limitations. The Notice of Intent for the above-referenced project has been evaluated and has been found to be consistent with the requirements of the Utah Air Conservation Rules (UACR) and the Utah Air Conservation Act. However, air pollution producing sources and/or their air control facilities may not be constructed, installed, established, or modified prior to the issuance of an Approval Order (AO) by the Executive Secretary of the Utah Air Quality Board. The Division of Air Quality has determined that a public comment period is not required for your particular project referenced above. Unless you have comments which would require changes, the AO for this project will be based upon the following conditions:
eneral Conditions:


### 1. This AO applies to the foIlowing company:
Interstate Brick 9780 South 5200 West 

### West Jordan, Utah 84084 The equipment listed below in this AO shall be operated at the following location:
PLANT LOCATION: 

### Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Coordinate System: 4,491.5 km North, 413.5 km East 2. Definitions of terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in the UACR, Utah Administrative Codes (UAC), and Series 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR). T'hese definitions take precedence unless specifically defined otherwise herein.
3. Interstate Brick shall operate the brick manufacturing facility according to the information submitted in the Notices of Intent dated November 30, 1992, December 1993, June 7, 1994, and additional information dated September 22, 1994, and according to requirements listed in this AO.



## <

~ 

## 7

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 3 4. Regardless of any inconsistency between conditions of this AO and Section IX.H.2.b.0

and Section IX.H.2, this AO shall take precedence as provided by R307-1-3.2.4, UAC. 5. A copy of this AO shall be posted on site. The AO shall be available to the employees who operate the air emission producing equipment. These employees shall receive instruction as to their responsibilities in operating the equipment according to all of the relevant conditions listed below.
6. The approved installations shall consist of the following equipment:
A. Tunnel Kiln #1
B. Tunnel Kiln #3
C. Tunnel Kiln #4
D. Griz.zly Hopper
E. Primary Crusher
F. Secondary Crusher/Grinding
G. Screens 

### H. Two Lime Silos.
I. Clay Storage Piles
J. Miscellaneous Diesel Equipment
K. Line 3 Baghouse - Micro Pulsaire*
L. Line 4 Baghouse - Micro Pulsaire* * Or Equivalent
7. This AO shall replace the AO dated October 20, 1980.
S. Interstate Brick shall rebuild the scrubber or design a new scrubbing system for Kiln #3. If the scrubber is rebuilt, the scrubber shall be rebuilt as described in the Notice of Intent dated December 10, 1993. Should the scrubber require replacement, or modifications other than those described as "Alternative A" in the December 10, 1993, Notice of Intent, Interstate Brick shall submit complete design specifications including operating parameters and proposed emission limitations for approval prior to construction. In no case shalI emissions of any pollutant from a newly designed scrubbing system exceed emission limitations listed in this AO as final limits.



# ~ ~

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 4 Interstate Brick shall modify the scrubber for Kiln #4 as proposed in the Notice of Intent

dated November 30, 1992. In addition, Interstate Brick shall operate the scrubber for Kiln #4 using soda ash in the scrubbing solution until modifications to the scrubber for Kiln #3 are complete and stack testing on the scrubber for KiIn #3 demonsuates that the scrubber is meeting the emission limits listed in this AO.
Limitations and Tests Procedures
9. 

### Emissions to the atmosphere fcom the indicated emission point shall not exceed the following rates and concentrations:

, A. Scrubber Emissions - Tunnel Kiln #1:

Pollutan. Transition Limits Final Limits (to October 1. 1995) 

### PM, o 

### (annual average)* Shall not operate 1.9 ib/hr

, 

### SO = (1-hr average) 17.0 lb/hr

SO = (annual average) 14.0 lb/hr NO,, 1.8 ib/hr HF (1-hr average) 4.5 lb/hr HF (annual average) 1.5 lb/hr
B. Scrubber Emissions

- 

### Tunnel Kiln #3:
llutan Transition Limits Final Limits (to October 1. 1995) 

### PM, o 

### (annual average)* 3.61b/hr 1.9 !b/hr
SO z (1-hr average) 105.0 lb/hr 17.0 lb/hr
SO ; (annual average) 36.81b/hr 14.0 lb/hr


### NO ; 1.8 Ib/hr 1.8 !b/hr HF (1-hr average) 10.5 Ib/hr 4.5 lb/hr HF (annual average) 3.5 lb/hr 1.5 lb/hr



# sq

## DAQE-947-94

October 

## 27, 1994 Page 5 C. Scrubber Emissions - Tunnel Kiln #4

Pollutant Transition Limits Final Limits (to October 1. 1995) 

## PM, a (annual average)* 

## 12.3 lb/hr 

## 12.3 Ib/hr


## SO Z (1-hr average) 51.0 lb/hr 

## 77.0 Ib/hr
SO = (annual average) 18.0 lb/hr 

## 27.0 lb/hr 

## NO,, 2.6 lb/hr 

## 2.6 lb/hr HF (1-hr average) 5.7 lb/hr 

## 7.2 lb/hr HF (annual average) 1.9 Ib/hr 

## 2.4 Ib/hr


## * PM, o emission rates expressed as annual averages above for the scrubbers for Kilns #1, 

## #2, and #3 shall be demonstrated through an 8-hr stack test. Should 

## PM, o emissions test at a higher rate than the limits expressed above, Interstate Brick shall provide documentation which demonstrates that the limits are being met, on an annual average basis, within 30 days of the date of the stack test. The method provided in the documentation shall be verifiable.
D. Primary Crusher Baghouse Vent
PM IO 0.49 Ibs/hr 

## 0.016 grains/dscf
E. Line 3 Baghouse 

## PM, o 0.37 lbs/hr 

## 0.016 grains/dscf
F. Line 4 Baghouse 

## PM, o 0.67 Ibs/hr 

## 0.016 grains/dscf
10. Stack testing to show compliance with the emission limitations stated in the above condition (excluding annual average emission rates for SO x and HF, but including annual average emission rates for 

## PM , O ) shall be performed as specified below;
Emission Point Pollutant Testing Test Status Freguengy Scrubber, Kiln #1 PM, o 

## *** ® SOZ *** % NO = *** ® 

### HF *** % 

# 2

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 6 Scrubber, Kiln #3

Scrubber, Tunnel Kiln #4

Primary Crusher Baghouse Line 3 Baghouse Line 4 Baghouse PM 10 ** ® SO2 ** ryo NO X ** ® HF ** % PM, o ** ® S02 ** % NO ; ** ® 

### HF ** % PM, a
PMIO ** ~ 

### PM IO ** ®
Me

- 

### stine Status 

### (To be applied above)
** Initial compliance testing is required. The initial test shall be completed by December 1, 1994, to show compliance with emissions limits listed during the transition period. An additional initial test shall be completed to show compliance with emission limits listed as final limits. Testing to show compliance with the final emission limits shall be completed by November 1, 1995 *** Initial compliance testing is required within 30 days of start-up of Tunnel Kiln #1. 

### ® Test if directed by the Executive Secretary. Tests may be 

### required if the source is suspected to be in violation with other conditions of this AO.
# Test every year 96 Test every three years
A. Notification 

### The applicant shall provide a notification of the test date at least 30 days before the test. A pretest conference shall be held if directed by the Executive Secretary. It shall be held at least 15 days before the test between the owner/operator, the tester, and the Executive Secretary. The emission point shall be designed to conform to the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 1, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) or Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) approvable access shall be provided to the test location.



# d/

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 Page 7
B. Pm_io

For stacks in which no liquid drops are present, the following methods shall be used: 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Methods 201 or 201a. The back half condensibles shall also be tested using the method specified by the Executive Secretary. All particulate captured shall be considered PM, o

. 

### For stacks in which liquid drops are present, methods to eliminate the liquid drops shouid be explored. If no reasonable method to eliminate the drops exists, then the following methods shall be used: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5, 5a, 5d, or Se as appropriate. The back half condensibles shall also be tested using the method specified by the Executive Secretary. The portion of the front half of the catch considered PM, o shall be based on information in AP-42, Appendix C or other data acceptable to the Executive Secretary. The back half condensibles shall not be used for compliance demonstration but shall be used for inventory purposes. Compliance testing of PM IO emissions for Kilns #1, #2, and #3 shall be conducted over an eight hour dme period.
C. Sample Location 40 CFR 60. Appendix A, Method 1
D. Volumetric Flow Rate 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2
E. Sulfur Dioxide (SO.,)

. 

### 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6, 6A, 6B or 6C
F. Nitrogen Oxides (NOJ 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 7, 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D or 7E
G. Hvdroflouric Acid (HF) The test method shall be submitted for approval or may be assigned by the Executive Secretary.

/'

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 Page 8
H. Calculations

To determine mass emission rates (ibs/hr, etc.), the pollutant concentration as determined by the appropriate methods above shall be multiplied by the volumetric flow rate and any necessary conversion factors determined by the Executive Secretary to give the results in the specified units of the emission limitation.
I. New Source Ooeration For a new source/emission point (Line 4 and Line 5 baghouses), the production rate during all compliance testing shall be no less than 90% of the production rate listed in this AO. If the maximum AO allowable production rate has not been achieved at the time of the test, the following procedure shall be followed: 1) Testing shall be at no less than 90% of the production rate achieved to date. 2) If the test is passed, the new maximum allowable production rate shall be 11090 of the tested achieved rate. This new allowable maximum production rate shall remain in affect until successfully tested at a higher rate. 3) The owner/operator shall request a higher production rate when necessary. Testing at no less than 9090 of the higher rate shall be conducted. A new maximum production rate (1109'0 of the new rate) will then be allowed if the test is successful. This process may be repeated until the maximum AO production rate is achieved.
J. Existing Source QReration For an existing source/emission point, the production rate during all compliance testing shall be no less than 90% of the maximum production achieved in the previous three (3) years.
11. Compliance with annual average limitations listed in condition #9 shall be determined through a method of mass balance. Interstate Brick shall submit a mass balance method of determining annual emissions to the Executive Secretary for approval no later than December 1, 1994. The plan shall include:
A. Proposed test methods and test frequency for determining the weight of the elemental sulfur and fluorine contained in the clays used to manufacture brick
B. Proposed test methods and test frequency for determining the weight of the elemental sulfur and fluorine contained in the finished product
C. A method of determining scrubber efficiencies as an annual average


# a

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 9


### D. Calculation method of determining annual emissions of S0 2 and HF which will

demonstrate compliance with the annual average emission rate(s) listed in condition #9 of this AO
12. The following limits shall not be exceed without prior approval in accordance with R307- 1-3.1, UAC.
A. Production/Consumption Iimits i) Raw Clay Consumption

120 tons/hr 1,051,200 tons/year ii) 512,582 tons of brick produced per 12-month period, plantwide
B. Tunnel Kiln #1 Annual production limit of bricks included in 12.A.ii above Note: Interstate Brick is not operating Tunnel Kiln #1 as of the date of this AO and it is not allowed to operate during the transition period (to 10/1/95). 

### The scrubber for Kiln #1 requires rebuilding and modifications to meet the emission limits contained in condition #9. 

### Interstate Brick shall submit a complete description of proposed modifications to the scrubber for Tunnel Kiln #1, and receive approval from the Executive Secretary, prior to construction.
C. Tunnel Kiln #3 Annual production limit of bricks included in 12.A.ii above
D. Tunnel Kiln #4 Annual production limit of bricks included in 12.A.ii above
E. Line 3 Baghouse 6,240 hours per year
F. Line 4 Baghouse 6,240 hours per year Compliance with the annual limitations shall be determined on a rolling 12-month total. The owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total based on the first day of each month using data from the previous 12 months. Records of consumption/production shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records 

## of



# to q

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 10 consumption/production, including rolling 12-month totals shall be made available to the

Executive Secretary or his representative upon request, and shall include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. The records shall be kept on a daily basis. Hours of operation shall be determined by supervisor monitoring and maintaining of an operations log.
13. Visible emissions from the following emission points shall not exceed the following values:
A. All crushers - 1535 opacity B. All screens - 10% opacity C. All conveyor transfer points - 10% opacity D. All baghouses - 109 opacity E. All other points - 20% opacity Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. Visibie emissions from mobile sources and intermittent sources shall use procedures similar to Method 9, but the requirement for observations to be made at 15-second intervals over a six-minute period'shall not apply.
14. The moisture content of the clay shall be maintained at an average of no less than 4.035 by weight. The siit content of the clay shall be no greater than an average of 18.0% by weight. The moisture content and the silt content shall be tested if directed by the Executive Secretary using the appropriate ASTM method.
15. The storage piles shall be watered to minimize generation of fugitive dusts as dry conditions warrant or as determined necessary by the Executive Secretary.
Fuels
16. The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a fuel and propane as a backup fuel in

the kilns. If any other fuel is to be used, an AO shall be required in accordance with R307-1-3.1, UAC.

1%4 

### odelin ff 

### 17. This source has been modeled for fluoride emissions prior to issuance of this AO. Interstate Brick shall submit an analysis using parameters measured during the initial stack test for each scrubber. The analysis shall include parameters measured as compared with the parameters used in the modeling exercise completed. Critical parameters to be included in the analysis are as follows:
A. Exhaust exit temperature
B. Exhaust exit velocity/flow
C. Fluoride emission rate



## ~~

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 Page 11 The results of the analysis shall be used to determine the applicability of the modeling

completed. Additional modeling shall be performed if directed by the Executive Secretary. Monitoring
18. Interstate Brick shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device for the continuous measurement of the change in pressure of the gas stream throuah each cru ber. The monitoring device must be certified by the manufacturer. The monitoring device shall be accurate within plus or minus one inch of water gauge and must be calibrated on an annual basis according to the manufacturer's instructions. Continuous recording for the monitoring device is not required. However, daily records of readings shall be maintained and dates of calibrations shall be recorded. Interstate Brick shall measure and record the pressure drop during each compliance stack test of each scrubber. The pressure drop measured during the most recent compliance stack test shall be the minimum (-10%) of that required during all operating periods.
19. Interstate Brick shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device for the continuous measurement of the scrubbing_liquid flow rate to the scrubber. The monitoring device must be.certified by the manufacturer. Accuracy shall be within plus or minus five percent of the design scrubbing liquid flow rate. Calibration shall be on an annual basis according to the manufacturer's instructions. Continuous recording for the monitoring device is not required. However, daily records of readings shall be maintained and dates of calibrations shall be recorded. Interstate Brick shall measure and record the scrubbing liquid flow rate during each compliance stack test on each sciubber. The scrubbing liquid flow rate measured during the most recent compliance stack test shall be the minimum (-10%) of that required during all operating periods.
20. Interstate Brick shall measure the pH of the scrubbing solution for each scrubber on a daily basis. The measuring device must be certified by the manufacturer as being accurate to plus or minus 5%. The measuring device shall be calibrated on a monthly basis. Interstate Brick shall measure and record the pH of the scrubbing liquid, and the type of neutralizer (hydrated lime, soda ash, etc.) during each compliance stack test of each scrubber. The pH measured during the latest compliance stack test shall be the minimum pH (-595) of the scrubbing solution during all operating periods. The neutralizer used during the most recent compliance stack test shall be that required during all operating periods.
Records & Miscellaneous
21. All installations and facilities authorized by this AO shall be adequately and properly maintained. All pollution control vendor recommended equipment shall be installed,



# 3010

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 Page 12 maintained, and operated. Instructions from the vendor or established maintenance

practices that maximize pollution control shall be used. All necessary equipment control and operating devices, such as pressure gauges, amp meters, volt meters, flow rate indicators, temperature gauges, continuous emission monitors (CEMs), etc., shall be installed and operated properly and easily accessible to compliaace inspectors. A copy of all manufacturers' operating instruction for pollution control equipment and pollution emitting equipment shall be kept on site. These instructions shall be available to all employees who operate the equipment and shall be made available to compliance inspectors upon their request.
22. All records referenced in this AO or in applicable NSPS or NESHAP, which are required to be kept by the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Executive Secretary or his representative upon request. Examples of records to be kept at this source shall include the following as applicable:
A. Production rate/operating hour limitations (Condition number 12) B. Scrubber operating parameters (Condition numbers 18, 19, and 20) C. Unavoidable Breakdown Reports (Condition number 24) D. Emergency episodes (Condition number 25)
23. The owner/operator shall comply with R307-1-3.5, UAC. This rule addresses emission inventory reporting requirements.
24. The owner/operator shall comply with R307-1-4.7, UAC. This rule addresses unavoidable breakdown reporting requirements. The owner/operator shall calculate/estimate the excess emissions whenever a breakdown occurs. The total of excess emissions shall be reported to the Executive Secretary as directed for each calendar year.
25. The owner/operator shall submit to the Executive Secretary an emergency episode plan within 60 days of the date of this AO. The plan shall identify what control/production measures the owner/operator shall implement when an emergency episode is declared by the Executive Director of the Department of Environmental Quality. Specific control/production measures shall be outlined for all three levels (Alert, Warning, Emergency). The values for the various levels are listed in R307-1-5, UAC. The emergency plan shall be approved by the Executive Secretary. Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be approved in accordance with R307-1-3. 1. 1, UAC. This AO in no way releases the owner or operator from any liability for compliance with all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations including the UACR.



## " .00

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 Page 13 Annual emissions for this source, the entire piant, are currently calculated at the following values:

Pollutant 

### Total Emissions tons/year 

### TSP 112.1 PM IO 88.8 S0 2 240.9 NO X 65.7 CO 27.2 VOC 0.8 HF 23.7 These calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicability of Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and nonattainment area major source requirements of the UACR. They are not to be used for purposes of determining compliance.
In 

### accordance with the requirements of Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act, the following pollutants may be subject to an operating permit fee. Both the fee rate and the class of pollutants are subject to change by state, the federal agencies, or both.

Pollutant 

### Total Emissions Tons/Year


### PM IO 88.8 SO Z 240.9 NO x 65.7 VOC 0.8 HF 23.7 The Division of Air Quality is authorized to charge a fee for reimbursement of the actual costs incurred in the issuance of an AO. Unless you have comments which would require additional work, the fee for this AO will be $4,625.00. An invoice is attached. Your AO can be issued as soon as payment is received. Sincerely,

Lynn R. Menlove, Manager New Source Review Section



# I

### DAQE-947-94

October 27, 1994 

### Page 14



### Znterstate Hrick Company Tunnel Ailn #4 Salt Lake Connty - CDS Al NA Tozics TitlevMajor

Fili ng Fee

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.00 

### Review Engineer 64.00 honrs @ $50.00/hr

. . . . $ 3,200.00 Modeler . . . . 28.50 honrs @ $50.00/hr

. . . $ 1,425.00
C 

### ompnter Fee . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.00
N 

### otice To Paper . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.00 

### Travel . . . . . 0.0 miles @ $0.23/mile

. . . . $ 0.00
Total Charges. .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,625.00

.~ 

### Amonnt Paid to Date

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.00

B 

### alance Due . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,625.00



### Please remit a covv of this invoice with yonr pavment.
Please send payment to:
Utah Division of Air Qnality 1950 West North Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-8420 (801) 536-4000



# m

# Appendix "B"

(AET Pretest Protocol)

ogmtucan Envizon»zanEat 9astin9 eom#ancJ 

## ffr2c.
clPino, IPGanLx, o4u:zana c5'crr ~ 

### e1ty, 2zEa4
702-786-8533 6o2-2S3-3354 801-266-7m 

# Q1

# AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL

TESTING COMPANY, INC.

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah .84660 (801) 266-7111

Pre-test Information Form & Attachments

SOURCE INFORMATION November 21, 1994 

## Facility Name: Interstate Brick Company Units to be Tested: 1. No. 3 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet

2. No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 3. No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Outlet Mailing Address: 9780 South 5200 West, West Jordan, Utah 84088-5689 Plant Address: Same as above Phone: (801) 280-5200



## - Plant Contact: Mr. James Keck, Plant Manager

Test Date: Week of December 5, 1994

CONTRACTOR OR TEST FIRM 

## Name: American Environmental Testing, Company, Inc. Address: 565 South Birch Drive, Spanish Fork, Utah, 84660 Phone: (801) 266-7111 Contact: V. Brent Benson, Technical Director



## SOURCE TEST SUMMARY

EPA Method 1 Location of Sample 8 Velocity 1, 2& 3



## Traverses from Stationary Sources



## -1-



## ~ `

### EPA Method 2 Stack Gas Veiocity and Flow 1, 2& 3 Rate from Stationary Sources EPA Method 3 Gas Analysis for Carbon Dioxide 1, 2& 3

Oxygen, Excess Air & Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gases EPA Method 4 Moisture Content in Stack 1 &3

Gases EPA Method 5 Particulate Emissions from 1& 3

Stationary Sources EPA Method 6C Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from 1, 2& 3

Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) EPA Method 7E Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from 1, 2& 3

Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)
EPA Method 13B Total Fluoride Emissions from 1& 3

Stationary Sources (Specific lon Electrode Method)
CEMS Gas Standards for Determination of Compliance

I. S02 (span 0-1000 ppm) a) Between 40-60% of span (400-600 ppm) 514.6 ppm b) Between 80-100% of span (800-1000 ppm) 901.6 ppm 11. NOx (span 0-300 ppm) a) Between 40-60% of span (120-180 ppm) 159.4 ppm b) Between 80-100% of span (240-300 ppm) 251.1 ppm

CALIBRATION DATA The Federal EPA and individual air pollution control agencies require various calibrations for specific items included in the EPA Method 5 sample train. Current calibrations for all of these items are included in Appendix "A".

-2- 

# 1 0q"

### PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT



### The manufacture of brick and related products such as clay pipe, pottery and some types of refractory brick involves the mining, grinding, screening and blending of the raw materials, and the forming, cutting or shaping, drying or curing, and firing of the final product. Surface clays and shales are mined in open pits. Most fine clays are found underground. After mining, the material is crushed to remove stones and is stirred before it passes onto screens for segregation by particle size. To start the forming process, clay is mixed with water, usually in a pug mill. The three principal processes for forming brick are stiff mud, soft mud and dry press. In the stiff mud process, sufficient water is added to give the clay plasticity, and bricks are formed by forcing the clay through a die. Wire is used in separating bricks. AII structural tile and most and most brick are formed by this process. The soft mud process is usually used with clay too wet for the stiff mud process. The clay is mixed with water to a moisture content of 20 to 30 percent, and the bricks are formed in molds. In the dry press process, clay is mixed with a small amount of water and formed in steel molds by appiying pressure of 500 to 1500 pounds per square inch. Wet clay units that have been formed are almost completely dried before firing, usually with waste heat from kiins. Many types of kilns are used for firing brick, but the most common are the downdraft periodic kiln and the tunnel kiln. The periodic kiln is a permanent brick structure with a number of fireholes where fuel enters the furnace. Hot gases from the fuel are drawn up over the bricks, down through then by underground flues, and out of the oven to the chimney. Although lower heat recovery makes this type less efficient than the tunnel kiln, the uniform temperature distribution leads to a good quality product.

SAMPLE TRAIN AND ANALYSIS INFORMATION 

### Interstate Brick company is currently operating under the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) "Intent to Approve Number DAQE-947-94" which requires that particulate testing be accomplished using EPA Method 201 A; unless liquid drops are present in the gas stream (which was found to be the case). EPA Method 5 will be used to substitute for EPA Method 201 A for th

- e No. 4 Kiln Outlet. The back half condensibles shall be tested using the method specified by the Executive Secretary (EPA Method 202). An EPA Method 5 sample train will be employed to perform the moisture, velocity and particulate determinations on the above reference testing. A stainless steel or quartz probe liner will be used and maintained at a temperature of 248 0 ± 25° F for the duration of the test. The filter holder will also be kept at a temperature of 248° ± 25° F. The first two (2) impingers will contain 100 mis of distilled water, the third impinger will be left empty, and the fourth will contain a known amount of silica gel. AII impingers will be weighed before and after each test to determine the moisture content of the gases. The impinger bath will be maintained at a temperature lower than 68° F to condense stack moisture. A minimum sample volume of 31 scf of a rate no less than 0.531 cfm is required. Pitot tubes and the meter system will be leak checked before and after sampling. Figure I is a schematic of the sample train to be used.W } ~ W

~ in W ~ (f1 F" 

# W a H ~ d W 

### ' W

~ 

## m 4 

# a~ a
W y~,~ 

## ~ N 

### W H ~ 0 LAJ tJ] 

## ~ W a

~ ~ 

# H d

~ 

### W 

### 0- 

# x W 1'- 

# = 4 4 W



# a_ W -J

J ~ Y ~
= LLI d ~ CU ~

~ lx W

~ •

lx W + 2 F '

~ 

### • a

~ 

# O

~ 

# + H =

~ W • Q J O 0

~ W W ~ H■ 

# d W cz -cc LLI 

### L) -cc 

# 4 t^

2 ~ F 4 m W LLI ?

~ ~ 0_ } ~

W 

### ~ d G

### J ~ _ d CD


### ~~ H

~

~ d

~

fJS ac W a ILI
~ ~ }
~ 

### d

lx W W

~ 0 

## a 4

~ H O H a ~



### ~ L

~ 

### LL 

### C

~ L



### Q

. 

# E

~ 

### ~ LO


## G s .r 

## m

~ 

### Q a W cx W 

### H W 

# z
co 4 G)

L6

_
~ O



# 9~

### EPA Methods 6C, 7E are instrumental methods. The sample train incorporates taking a sample

lirie from the stack, conditioning the sample, and finally running it through the analyzers. Figure II is a schematic of the analyzer sample train, showing both sample line locations and calibration line locations. Variations to this schematic will be made according to each method. The mass emission calculations for S0 2and NO X will use the flow rate (DSCFH) derived from each of the EPA Method 5 tests respectfully. An EPA Method 201 A sample train will be employed to perform the above referenced PM 10 testing. The sampling device used is a Cyclone I of the SRIIEPA five-stage series cyclone. This device provides a 10 micron size cut at a flow rate of approximately 0.5 dscfm; the precise flow rate depends on local stack conditions. A glass or teflon probe liner will be used and maintained at a temperature of 248° ± 25°F for the duration of the test. The filter holder will also be kept at a temperature of 248 0 ± 25°F. The first two (2) impingers will contain 100 mis of distilled water, the third impinger will be lift empty, and the fourth will contain a known amount of silica gel. AII impingers will be weighed before and after each test to determine the moisture content of the gases. The impinger bath will be maintained at a temperature lower that 68°F to condense the moisture. The back-half impinger solutions will be evaporated and weighed or extracted with methylene chloride and evaporated and weighed as per EPA Method 202 depending on the pH of the solution. Pitot tubes and the meter system will be leak checked before and after sampling. Figure III is a schematic of the EPA Method 201A sample train to be used.

STACK SCHEMATIC AND TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS 

### The location of sampling and velocity traverse points are rigidly controlled in EPA Method 1 with respect to the stack diameter and the distance from the sampling ports to up-stream and down-stream interferences to laminar flow. A drawing of the exhaust duct and stack showing the sampling locations and their relationship to the interferences to flow are shown as follows:
1. Figure IV for the No. 3 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 2. Figure V for the No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 3. Figure VI for the No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Outlet. The exact location of each of the traverse points on each of the stack diameters (90 0 apart from one another at the sample port locations) are given in the following tables.
1. Table I for the No. 3 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 2. Table II for the No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 3. Table III for the No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Outlet.

### k 

# CEM Sample Train Fi gure 11

Continuous Emissions Analyzers

Cali bration Gases



# -6- ~ 

# b

### OC 

## W H W
~ O

~ ~ W 

### 2 F

~

O L

~ 

### C

~ L

~

~ 

# a E a~ 

### N Q T

~ N 

# v C t r
~

~
Q 

# a W

OC

W J 0

. 

# E 4c to O
~

~ 0. 

## ~ W ~ 

## } ~

-7- ~~

## 48" Interstate Brick Compeny No. 3 Kiln Inlet 

## Fi gure I V

A= 251 "= 5.23 Diameters B= 120" = 2.5 Diameters



# ~ 

# r

### Interstete Brick Compony 

## No. 4 Kiln Inlet Figure V



# ~

L 4 

## 8"

-9- 

# ~~-10- 

# ~

120"



### A = 523" = 4.35 Di

B=366"=3.04Di 

### Interstate Brick Company No. 4 Kiln Outlet ,
Figure V1

### 5 10 15 20

. . . .



### 4 9 14 19

. . . .



### 3 8 13 18



### . . . .

2 7 12 17

. . . .



### 1 6 11 16



### . . . . 48"



### 9.6" 4.8

.. 

### Interstate Brick Company
No.3 Kiln Inlet
Table I

48"



## ~ 66 16 66

Sample Ports are 15" Long

Semple Poi nt Distance from outside of Port 1, 6, 1 1, 16 19.8" = 19 3}4" 2, 7, 12, 17 29.4" = 29 3I8" 3, 8, 13, 18 39.0" = 39" 4, 9, 14, 19 48.6" = 48 5I8" 5, 10, 15, 20 58.2" = 58 114"

- 11 - R4 

### 8 12

. . .

3 7 11

. . .

2 6 

### 10



### . . .

t 5 9

. . . 48" 

### Interstate Brick Company
No.4 Kiln Inlet
Table II

48

..



# 66 66 6

Sample Ports are 15" Long

Sample Poi nt 

# I I Distance from outside of Port 1,5,9 21.0"=21" 2, 6, 10 33.0" = 33" 3, 7, 1 1 45.0" = 45" 4, 8, 12 57.0" = 57"

### 5 10 15 20 25

. . . . .

4 9 14 19 24

. . . . .

3 8 13 18 23

. . . . .



### 2 7 12 

### 17 22

. . . . .

1 6 11 16 21

. . . . . 

### 120" 

### Interstate Brick Company
No.4 Kiln Outlet
Table I11

120.5"



# 1 

# 6 16 16 16 66

Sample Ports are 15.75" Long

Sample Point Distance from outside of Port 1, 6, 11, 16 & 21 27.75" = 27 3/4" 2, 7, 12, 17 & 22 51.75" = 51 3f4" 3, 8, 13, 18 & 23 75.75" = 75 3!4" 4,9,14,19&24 99.75" = 99 3J4" 5, 10, 15, 20 & 25 123.75" = 123 3l4" 

# m

### SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS AND OTHER REGIUIREMENTS



### AII testing stations will be accessible from OSHA approved scaffolding or platforms. AET will require 4- 120V, 20 amp, 10 circuits to be provided by Interstate Brick Company in order to perform the emissions tests. AET does not anticipate at this time that during these tests it will be necessary to deviate from any of the methodology specified in 40 CFR 60. A copy of Interstate Brick Company's Current Approval Order is contained in Appendix "B".

-14-

# Appendix "C" (Production 

# Data)

Amatfcan 

### &vEzonmanEaf gEStin9 eom#any ffnc.
cRino, aNtv" gwocnfx, ogti.zona ~ 

## 'Q.fr lag ea y , 2[tag

702-786-8553 6o2-253-3354 8oi-z66-7m

### e 

## 6

~ 

# k I-rl c'c k
~ 

## L r `



# "ZO

A-IIAJ '.

~ 

# ` rn -e

~ ~ 

## ~ ~ 

# I NTERSTATE ZRICK

socrth 5200 Wesr 

### West Jordast, Utah 8d , 088-56a9 (807) 565-5200 800/233-8654 (NA7"L) 800/233-1244 (UTr

~ 

### I-n (80Z) 56S.5220 FAX 

## -7 0,' 

## ~ 6 

# -7! I,

PX-f-, ~~ c~ ~

.- t ~ ,



## 1
~ 

# 2r - : °`c. ~~ 

# n S

..r



### ~~~ =~ 

### 1c o• c, ~'~ ~v S~ ~ Z~ b

~

~

Q-~ .z- 

## o " 

# . ~

~ 

## `rt s +ns



## vv'T 2 zc--S .~



# - I r• 

# lV 7
W

. - Yri Ix : 

## ~ ~ xSx~,~~~~~, s ~ 

# sh: Y

~ 

# Te I

. 

# 1 }' vr ~ ~e- ✓ o

'~ ' ~ : .°.+

~ r c ~ I 

## ,IpACIFtC CoAST
Auil 

### ~ in; provuG:a 

### ~

# Appendix "D"

(Field & Laboratory Data).

o. ,



### ogmczican Envizonm.cnEcrt 9

~ 

### utiny eom/sany ffnc.

702-786-8533. 6o2-253-3354 8or-266-7»>AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
MOISTURE & FLOW RATE DATA FORMAT

1 Plant Interstate Brick 2 City West Jordan,Utah 3 Location Kiln #3 4 Operator Ryan Benson 5 Date 12/7/94 6 Test Number EPA 4 - #1 Compliance 7 Stack Diameter (in) 54.16 8 Sample Box Number RAC #2A 9 Meter Box Number RAC #2824 10 Meter "H@ 1.613 11 Meter Calibration, Y 0.917 12 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8429 13 Probe Length (ft) 6'-B 14 Probe Liner Material Stainless Steel 15 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248. 16 Ambient Temperature (°F) 40 17 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.42 18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.18 19 Absolute Pressure, Pabs (Hg) 25.407 20 C Factor 0 21 Reference "P (in H20) 0.48 22 Noale Identification Number 1/2"42 23 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.502 24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.002 25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 22.3 26 Stack Area in Square Feet 15.999 27 Gas Analysis 28 CO (%) 0 29 C 0 2 (%) 3.4 30 02 (%) 14.8 31 N2 (e) 81.8PRE #1 Pretest and Post-test Velocities
Time: 1350 POST #1

- PRE 82 Time: 

### 1450 Stack Temp 

### 423 Stack Temp 

### : 

### 420 Traverse Pretest AP Sq. Root AP Post-test AP Sq. Root AP Point 

### # 1 1.5 1.2247 1.3 1.1402 2 1.8 1.3416 1.7 1.3038 3 2.9 1.7029 2.8 1.6733 4 2.6 1.6125 2.8 1.6733 5 2.7 1.6432 2.5 1.5811 6 3.1 1.7607 2.9 1.7029 7 4.2 2.0494 4 2.0000 8 5.2 2.2804 5.3 2.3022 9 5.6 2.3664 5.7 2.3875 10 5.7 2.3875 5.5 2.3452 11 2.1 1.4491 2.2 1.4832 12 2.9 1.7029 2.7 1.6432 13 3.1 1.7607 3.3 1.8166 14 4.1 2.0248 3.9 1.9748 15 3.7 1.9235 3.5 1.8708 16 3.9 1.9748 4.1 2.0248 Average 

### = 3.444 1.8253 Average 

### = 3.388 1.8077 POST #2

- PRE #3 POST #3 Time: 

### 1545 TI me: 1630 Stack Temp 

### 425 Stack Temp 

### : 

### 424 Traverse Pretest AP Sq. Root AP Post-test AP Sq. Root ^P Point 

### # 1 1.7 1.3038 1.4 1.1832 2 2 1.4142 2.1 1.4491 3 2.4 1.5492 2.5 1.5811 4 2.5 1.5811 2.7 1.6432 5 3.3 1.8166 3.2 1.7889 6 4.4 2.0976 4.1 2.0248 7 5.1 2.2583 5.3 2.3022 8 5.4 2.3238 5.1 2.2583 9 5.5 2.3452 5.6 2.3664 10 5.4 2.3238 5.2 2.2804 11 2.3 1.5166 2.4 1.5492 12 2.7 1.6432 2.9 1.7029 13 3.2 1.7889 3.4 1.8439 14 4.3 2.0736 4.5 2.1213 15 3.5 1.8708 3.3 1.8166 16 3.8 1.9494 3.6 1.8974 Average 

### = 3.594 1.8660 Average a 3.581 1.8631



### 'Sample Meter Meter Stack Meter Gas Gas

Point Temperature Temperature Temperature Volume Voiume

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference ( °F ) ( ° F) ( °F ) ( ft3 ) ("_) Starting 226.342 1 65 65 401 227.882 1.54 2 67 68 411 229.392 1.51 3 67 70 415 230.896 1.50 4 67 73 416 232.391 1.49 5 67 75. 417 233.889 1.50 6 68 79 419 235.392 1.50 7 69 82 420 236.895 1.50 8 70 84 421 238.397 1.50 9 70 86 421 239.909 1.51 10 72 89 422 241.427 1.52 11 73 90 422 242.944 1.52 12 74 91 422 244.457 1.51 13 75 93 423 245.979 1.52 14 76 94 424 247.503 1.52 15 77 96 425 249.016 1.51 16 78 96 425 250.533 1.52 17 78 97 421 252.063 1.53 18 79 98 419 253.585 1.52 19 80 99 422 255.102 1.52 20 81 100 425 256.631 1.53

avg °F avg °R

total ' average = 79.45 419.55 539.45 879.55
30.289 30.29 72.65

. 86.25 419.55 Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm 

# m40 40 2 1326.50 Sampling 

### Clock T' ime Time 5.01 247.50 257.75 40.00



### Vacuum Probe Exit Filter Outtet Impinger

Temperature Temperature Temperature ( °F ) ( °F ) ( ° F) 1.20 Pressure Diff "H Pressure Difference "H (in H20)

1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 12 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Sampling 

### Ctock Vacuum Probe Fifter Impinger

Time Time Temperature Temperature Temperature Exit Exit Outlet (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) (°F) (°F) (°F)

1300 2 1302 5.1 245 254 38 2 1304 5 248 257 38 2 1306 5 245 254 39 2 1308 5 247 258 40 2 1310 5 249 260 40 2 1315 5 247 257 40 2 1317 5 249 261 40 2 1319 5 244 257 41 2 1321 5 248 261 40 2 1323 5 247 258 40 2 1330 5 250 255 40 2 1332 5 245 257 41 2 1334 5 249 260 40 2 1336 5 247 254 40 2 1338 5 249 259 40 2 1343 5 250 260 41 2 1345 5 247 258 42 2 1347 5 245 257 40 2 1349 5 249 260 40 2 1351 5 250 258 40



# 411POST TEST CALCULATiONS AND INFORMATION

Actuai Meter Voiume Vm : 30.289 Volume H20 Vic (miis) = 49.1

Meter Volume Vm Std = 23.177 Volume H20 Vw (std) = 2.311
Mole Wt Dry Stack Gas = 29.136 Moisture Content Bws = 0.091

Mole Wt Wet Stack Gas = 28.126

STACK VELOCITY FT/SECOND DRY STAClC FLOW RATE FT3/HOUR

Kp a 85.49 Q(std) #1 = 3.8727E+6 Vs #1 = 145.382 Q(std) #2 - 3.9139E+6 Vs #2 = 147.0930 Q(std) #3 = 3.9684E+6 Vs #3 = 149.4789

Average Meter Temoerature Leak Check Information Degrees °F = 79.45 Initial Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes Degrees °R = 539.45 Finish 226.271 A= OK Start 226.269 B = OK Average Delta OH Rate = 0.0020 AFI = 1.20 Vac. = 22.3 Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubea Average Sqrt OP and Stack Temo °F Finish 256.751 A= OK #1 a 1.8165 421.50 Start 256.748 B= OK #2 = 1.8369 422.50 Rate = 0.0030 #3 = 1.8645 424.50 Vac. = 20
Lenqth of Test Minutes = 40

Source Testlna Summarv and Comments



# 9~EMISSiONS SUMMARY SHEET NOx

Mass Emission Calibratlon Blas Data

Run #1 Run #1 NOx (ppm) 0 31.3 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) _-0.80 NOx (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) _-0.70 correctlon) a 31.90 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 159.90 NOx (Ibs/hr) = 14.751 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 159.40 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 160.40

Run #2 NOx (ppm) e 32.44 Run 42 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) _-0.70 NOx (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) a-0.40 corroction) = 3287 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 159.90 NOx (Ibs/hr) = 15.359 Cal Gas Protest (ppm) = 160.40 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 159.50

Run 43 Run #3 NOx (ppm) = 39.84 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) e-0.40 NOx (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) _

- 0.50 corroctlon) = 40.26 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) 0 159.90 NOx (Ibs/hr) 19.078 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 159.50 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 159.60



# 9~EAAISSIONS SUMMARY SHEET S02

Mass Emission Calibration Bias Data

S02 (ppm) = 600.39 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) _-0.90 S02 (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) _-0.50 conrection) = 599.53 Cai Gas Actual (ppm) = 901.60 S02 (Ibs/hr) : 385.419 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 904.20 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 902.30

Run #2 Run #2 S02 (ppm) = 593 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) _-0.50 S02 (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) o-0.70 correction) = 592.09 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 901.60 S02 (Ibs/hr) = 276.692 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 902.30 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 904.30

Run #3 Run #3 S02 (ppm) = 547.71 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) --0.70 S02 (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) _-0.10 correction) e 546.41 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 901.60 S02 (Ibs/hr) = 258.902 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 904.30 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) - 903.70



# 9~

# American Environmental Testing Company, Inc_ 565 So uth Birr.h D rive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111


## LABORATORY DJ1TA 

## EPA Method 5 Company: Run Number. 

# ~ 1 Sampiing Location: ~ 

## 3 k—r-4A,' z

~ V 

## e r r Date: 

# /z -7- 7y
Moisture Coilected



## Impinger 1 Impinger 2 Impinger 3 Impinger 4 

## Initial YVeight

5

- 7 F V/ 

# Szi-7 

# 5 -07 f 777.0 Final Weight Wetght Gain



# .1/9. 1,( 7-1 . v

/~ 

# /. 6
Total Gain Partkuiate Coilected 

## Front - Halt Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Filter and Oven Glassware) 1. 2. 3. 4.
S. Fiiter Finai Weight Fiiter Tane YWeight Total Filter Weight 

## Particulate caught in nozzle, probe and gfassware Total Front - HaN Catch 

# =I

~
Back - Hatf Analysis (Impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 1. Partkutate caught in Impingers 

## evaporated down at less than 120' F. 

# N14
Total Particulate Catch (Sum ot Front and Back - Halt Catctles)



# N14, .. 

## American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111



## Company: Date: /2 -, f ~ 

### /



## Source: ~.3



## k

~ 

## rGv ~~v



## G~ T 

## Run Number. 

# .Az

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

## (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Dixoide Carbon

Monoxide 

# 3, Lo. ~ 3

. 

# q z o l
3 ~~.~ ~ y •~' 3, 1 -1 Average
~ 

# /, f

~ ~ 

# L f,

~ 

# " 3 , z p ~



# 8AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT

1 Plant 2 City 3 Location 4 Operator 5 Date 6 Method and Run # 7 Stack Diameter (in) 8 Sample Box Number 9 Meter Box Number 10 Meter "H@ 11 Meter Calibration, Y 12 Pitot Tube, Cp 13 Probe Length (ft) 14 Probe Liner Material 15 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 16 Ambient Temperature (°F) 17 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 18 Assumed Moisture (%) 19 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) 20 C Factor 21 Reference "P (in H20) 22 Nozile Identification Number 23 Nozzie Diameter (in) 24 Thermometer Number 25 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 26 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 27 Filter Number 28 Gas Analysis 29 CO (%) 30 C 0 2 (%) 31 02 (%) 32 N2 (%) Interstate Brick West Jordan, Utah #4 Kiln Greg Johnson Monday, 5 December 1994 EPA 5 & 138 - #1 Compliance

135.69 RAC #2 RAC #2824 1.613 0.917 0.8401 11'-A Stainless 248 40 25.3 15 0.01 0 0.023 1/2-#12 0.501 1-A 0.0070 24 K-4

0 2.23 16.90 80.87NOaLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKiNETiC ^H Dn = 0.501 AH = 0.6033

constant 0.0357 Gm 0.75 Pb(in HG) 25.3 Pgm(in H20) 0.01 Pm 25.3007 Cp 0.8401 Tm(°17 70 Tm(°R) 530 Bwm 0 Bws 0.15 Ts(°17 125 Ts(°R) 585 Mds 29.0328 Ms 27.3779 Pb(in HG) 25.3 Pgs(in H20) 0.01 Ps 25.3007 (^P)avg 0.023 Dn 

### = 0.5028 Cp 0.8401 Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 Gel H20(g) 12.0000 V(H20)(mi) 127.8000 Vm(acf) 49.2300 "h avg 0.2000 Vwc 6.0155 Vmc 38.0360 Bws 

### = 0.1366 constant 849.8000 ^H(& 1.0000 Mds 29.0328 Mm 29.0328 K 26.2287 ^P 0.0230 AH 0.6033



# 0Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference ( ° F) ( ° F) ( ° F) (ft3) 

### X) starting 69.262 1 59 60 130 70.613 1.35 2 65 66 128 72.001 1.39 3 65 69 126 73.392 1.39 4 66 72 125 74.801 1.41 5 66 75 127 76.31 1.51 6 67 78 128 78.112 1.80 7 68 82 125 80.207 2.10 8 70 86 125 82.281 2.07 9 72 88 122 84.392 2.11 10 73 90 125 86.389 2.00 11 75 92 125 88.502 2.11 12 76 93 125 90.456 1.95 13 77 95 124 92.561 2.11 14 78 96 123 94.642 2.08 15 79 97 124 96.694 2.05 16 80 99 125 98.756 2.06 17 82 83 

### - 125 100.864 2.11 18 82 85 125 102.978 2.11 19 83 86 124 105.052 2.07 20 83 87 124 107.093 2.04 21 83 88 125 109.134 2.04 22 84 90 125 111.206 2.07 23 84 92 125 113.285 2.08 24 84 94 125 115.336 2.05 25 84 96 124 117.449 2.11



### avg °F avg °R

total = average 

### = 75.40 Sample Meter Point Temperature

Inlet 

### (°F) 80.48 125.16

540.48 585.16

48.1870 48.19 85.56 125.16 Meter Stack Gas Gas Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume Outtet (°F) T Vm Vm 

# IVelocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Ciock Vacuum Head Diff ^Ps Time Time "Ps "H (in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 1500 0.01 0.41 0.1000 3 1503 2.2 0.011 0.46 0.1049 3 1506 2.6 0.011 0.46 0.1049 3 1509 2.8 0.012 0.51 0.1095 3 1512 3 0.015 0.63 0.1225 3 1515 3.5 0.022 0.93 0.1483 3 1522 4.1 0.025 1.07 0.1581 3 1525 4.4 0.024 1.03 0.1549 3 1528 4.3 0.025 1.08 0.1581 3 1531 4.5 0.022 0.95 0.1483 3 1534 4 0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1540 4.5 0.02 0.87 0.1414 3 1543 4 0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1546 4.5 0.024 1.05 0.1549 3 1549 4.4 0.023 1.01 0.1517 3 1552 4.2 0.023 1.01 0.1517 3 1600 4.2 0.025 1.08 0.1581 3 1603 4.5 0.025 1.08 0.1581 3 1606 4.5 0.024 1.04 0.1549 3 1609 4.4 0.022 0.96 0.1483 3 1612 4 0.022 0.96 0.1483 3 1620 4.1 0.023 1.00 0.1517 3 1623 4.3 0.023 1.01 0.1517 3 1626 4.3 0.022 0.96 0.1483 3 1629 4 0.025 1.10 0.1581 3 1632 4.5

75 75 0.0211 0.9141 0.1441 3 1560.58 3.99 Velocity Pressure 3qrc Sampling Clock Vacuum Head Diff "Ps Time Time "Ps "H

//A)Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point Exit Outlet Isokinetics (°F) ( °F ) (°F)

258

. 263 49 6.6179 100.13 255 258 48 6.9291 96.96 254 255 48 6.9173 96.77 254 256 48 7.2188 93.47 253 251 48 8.0846 89.50 255 254 47 9.7993 88.11 258 252 47 10.4194 95.50 255 253 47 10.2089 96.02 251 250 47 10.3926 95.22 250 249 46 9.7742 96.01 248 250 46 10.4194 95.03 250 253 47 9.3194 98.04 248 254 48 10.4105 94.21 249 255 48 10.1914 94.82 251 252 48 9.9854 95.43 250 250 48 9.9939 95.76 252 248 47 10.4194 94.95 253 250 47 10.4194 95.07 254 251 47 10.2001 94.95 251 252 47 9.7659 97.50 253 254 48 9.7742 97.51 252 255 48 9.9939 96.60 250 256 48 9.9939 96.77 251 254 47 9.7742 97.45 250 255 48 10.4105 93.99

252.20 252.20 47.48 Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger Temperature Temperature Temperature ( ° F) ( °F ) ( °F )



# rDjVOLUME DRY GAS Vm(std) = 36.5016

Vm 48.1870 Vm(std) = 36.5016 POST TEST CALCULATION

VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT Vw(std) = 6.0485 Bws = 0.1421 Vic(mis) 128.5 Vw(std) = 6.0485

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE: STACK VELOCITY Vs = 9.4985 Mds = 29.0328 

### Kp 85.49 MOL WT WET STACK GASE: Vs = 9.4985 

### DRY STACK FLOW RATE a(std) = 2.2476E+6

Mws = 27.4645

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION

An = 1.3690E-3

% ISO = 95.5270

Initial Leak Check Rate Finish 69.028 Pltot Tubes Start 69.021 A = OK Rate = 0.0070 B = OK

Vac. = 24 Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes Finish 117.566 A = OK Start 117.558 B = OK Rate = 0.0080 Vac. - 21.1 PARTICULATI CONCEJdTRATION Cs = 1.2164E-3

Mn 44.4 Cs = 1.2164E-3 ibs/dscf = 2.6816E-6 grains/dscf = 0.0188 Ibs/hr = 6.0273



### FLUORIDE CONCENTRATION Cs - 4.9587E-4

Mn 18.1 Cs = 4.9587E-4 Ibs/dscf = 1.0932E-6 grains/.dscf 0.0077 Ibs/hr - 2.4571



### ~~~,INLET EMISSIONS SUMMARY

Mass Emissions

NOx (ppm) = 13.32 NOx (ppm bias correctlon) 12.36 NOx (Ibs/hr) 3.318 Calibration Blas Data

Run #1 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) s 1.10 Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.90 Cai Gas Actual (ppm) m 159.90 Cai Gas Pretest (ppm) a 160.80 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 159.90

Run #1 S02 (ppm) = 211.33 S02 (ppm bias correction) : 209.31 S02 (ibs/hr) 78.096 Run #1 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) a 0.00 Zero Gas Post (ppm) _ -0.30 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) a 260.70 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 264.40 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) m 26210



# /05

### OUTLET EMISSIONS SUMMARY

Mass Emissions Calibratlon Blas Data

NOx (ppm) _ NOx (ppm bias correction)

~ NOx (Ibs/hr) 12.07 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) = 0.90 Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.50 11.43 Cal Gas Actuai (ppm) = 159.90 3.069 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 159.50 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 159.90

Run #1 S02 (ppm) = 35.56 S02 (ppm bias correction) 35.26 S02 (Ibs/hr) 13.156 Run #1 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) = 1.80 • Zero Gas Post (ppm) _ -0.90 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 163.50 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 163.70 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 162.80



# /o 

# ~

## American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

LABORATORY DATA 

## EP Method 5 Company: 6

.. 

## Run Number: f~ ~~/~/ ~ S 7 ` IS' 4

e 

### Sampling Location: ~ ~ 

### Date:



## Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain Impinger 1 '

- ~S S ~ 

### - Z • 3 Impinger 2 S~ I • 

### ~I. ~ - ~ Impinger 3 D •

~ 

## c ` Impinger 4 

## ''

~ 

## %3 • ~ 

### ~ 

### v•

~ 

### Total Gain = ~ 

### Particulate Collected 

## Front - Half Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Filter and Oven Glassware)
1. Flter Final Weight 2. Filter Tare Weight 3. Total Ffter Weight 

## 4. Particulate caught in 

## nozzle, probe and glassware 5. Total Front - Half Catch O. 7.3 I



## Back - Half Analysis (Impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 1. Particulate caught in impingers evaporated down at less than 120° F. 

## Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and Back - Half Catches) 

# -4-r4 w-
~



## / 

# IDO. 

# American Environmenta! Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive 

## Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

N z: 

## ~ 4 

# &

~► 

## . .: . 

## Company:

~ 

# ;_ Date: 

# , Z - S:V

. Source: _~ , 

## Run Number:



# ORSAT ANALYSlS (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry

's r 

## ~`~' 6 

## ' Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon 

## Dixoide Carbon



## Monoxide

. ~ 

### -4 

# 7 e 

### 3

. ~ ~, 0.9 

# l ~ ~ ?. ~2- 

# 3 yo j7a
Average 7/7

/~ 

# 6AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT

1 Plant 2 City 3 Location 4 Operator 5 Date 6 Method and Run # 7 Stack Diameter (in) 8 Sample Box Number 9 Meter Box Number 10 Meter "H@ 11 Meter Cafibration, Y 12 Pitot Tube, Cp 13 Probe Length (ft) 14 Probe Liner Material 15 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 16 Ambient Temperature (°F) 17 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 18 Assumed Moisture (%) 19 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) 20 C Factor 21 Reference ^P (in H20) 22 Nozzle Identification Number 23 Nozzle Diameter (in) 24 Thermometer Number 25 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 26 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 27 Filter Number 28 Gas Analysis 29 CO (%) 30 C 0 2 (%) 31 02 (%) 32 N2 (%) Interstate Brick West Jordan, Utah #4 Kiln David Hunt Tuesday, 6 December 1994 EPA-5 & 13B - #2 Compliance

135.69 RAC #2 RAC #2824 1.613 0.917 0.8401 11'-A Stainless 248 45 25.2 15 0.01 0 0.023 1/2-#12 0.501 1-A 0.0080 23.6 K-5

0 2.47 16.80 80.73



# ,V1

### PRETEST CALCULATIONS

NOaLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH Dn o 0.501 ^H = 0.6033

constant 0.0357 am 0.75 Pb(in HG) 25.2 Pgm(in H20) 0.01 Pm 25.2007 Cp 0.8401 Tm(°F) 70 Tm(°R) 530 Bwm 0 Bws 0.15 

### Ts(°F) 125 Ts(°R) 585 Mds 29.0672 Ms 27.4071 Pb(in HG) 25.2 Pgs(in H20) 0.01 Ps 25.2007 (^P)avg 0.023 On e 0.5024 Cp 0.8401 Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 Gel H20(g) 12.0000 V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 Vm(acfl 49.2300 "h avg 0.2000 Vwc 6.0155 Vmc 37.8857 Bws = 0.1370 constant 849.8000 AH@ 1.0000 Mds 29.0672 Mm 29.0672 K 26.2317 ^P 0.0230 AH = 0.6033



## ~~~ ~Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference ( °F ) ( ° F) ( ° F) (' "') (' `3) starting 118.037 1 64 64 125 119.701 1.66 2 67 68 124 121.562 1.86 3 68 71 125 123.559 2.00 4 68 75 125 125.601 2.04 5 69 78 125 127.637 2.04 6 72 78 125 129.767 2.13 7 73 81 124 131.935 2.17 8 74 84 125 134.104 2.17 9 74 87 125 136.262 2.16 10 75 90 125 138.412 2.15 11 76 93 124 140.582 2.17 12 77 95 125 142.755 2.17 13 78 96 125 144.973 2.22 14 79 96 123 147.175 2.20 15 80 97 124 149.372 2.20 16 81 98 125 151.543 2.17 17 82 99 124 153.736 2.19 18 83 99 125 155.955 2.22 19 84 99 123 158.172 2.22 20 85 100 125 160.339 2.17 21 83 92 122 162.355 2.02 22 84 94 120 164.451 2.10 23 86 95 121 166.552 2.10 24 87 97 122 168.549 2.00 25 87 98 122 170.573 2.02

avg °F 83.20 123.92 avg °R 543.20 583.92

total

- 52.5360 52.54 average 77.44 88.96 123.92 Sample Meter Meter Stack 

### Gas Gas Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm


# I DqVelocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Head Diff "Ps Time Time 

### "Ps "H (in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 

### 1000 0.015 0.63 0.1225 3 1003 3.5 0.018 0.76 . 0.1342 3 1006 3.7 0.021 0.89 0.1449 3 1009 4 0.021 0.89 0.1449 3 1012 4 0.023 0.98 0.1517 3 1015 4.2 0.023 0.98 0.1517 3 1030 4.2 0.025 1.07 0.1581 3 1033 4.5 0.025 1.08 0.1581 3 1036 4.5 0.024 1.04 0.1549 3 1039 4.4 0.024 1.04 0.1549 3 1042 4.4 0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1050 4.5 0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1053 4.6 0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1056 4.6 0.025 1.10 0.1581 3 1059 4.6 0.024 1.05 0.1549 3 1102 4.5 0.024 1.05 0.1549 3 1106 4.5 0.024 1.06 0.1549 3 1109 4.5 0.025 1.10 0.1581 3 1112 4.6 0.025 1.10 0.1581 3 1115 4.6 0.023 1.01 0.1517 3 1118 4.3 0.02 0.88 0.1414 3 1130 3.9 0.021 0.93 0.1449 3 1133 4 0.021 0.93 0.1449 3 1136 4.1 0.02 0.89 0.1414 3 1139 3.9 0.02 0.89 0.1414 3 1142 3.9



### 75 75 0.0226 0.9844 0.1502 3 1068.65 4.26 Velocity Preasure Sqrt Sampling C1ock Vacuum Head Diff "Ps Time Time 

### "Ps "H



## `~ 

# vProbe Filter Impinger Vs Point to

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point Exit Outlet Isokinetics (°F) (°F) (°F)

237 238 47 8.0607 98.15 238 235 47 8.8225 99.57 240 237 47 9.5376 98.71 237 236 47 9.5376 100.60 238 237 47 9.9814 95.55 238 236 47 9.9814 99.72 236 235 46 10.3975 96.98 237 235 46 10.4064 96.79 238 236 46 10.1961 98.04 237 235 46 10.1961 97.36 235 236 46 10.3975 95.91 237 236 47 10.4064 95.89 236 235 47 10.4064 97.72 238 237 47 10.3886 96.77 237 236 48 10.1874 98.46 238 236 48 10.1961 97.23 237 236 48 10.1874 97.97 235 235 48 10.4064 97.15 235 236 48 10.3886 96.82 236 235 48 9.9814 98.66 233 240 48 9.2838 98.92 236 238 48 9.4967 99.97 238 235 48 9.5049 100.05 238 234 48 9.2838 97.29 237 233 48 9.2838 98.53

236.88 236.88 47.24 Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger Temperature Temperature Temperrature (°F) (°F) (°F)VOLUME DRY GAS POST TEST CALCULATION

MOISTURE CONTENT VOLUME H20 VAPOR Vm(std) = 39.4402 Vw(std) = 5.8273 Bws o 0.1287

Vm 52.5360 Vm(std) = 39.4402 Vic(mis) 123.8 Vw(std) = 5.8273

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE:

Mds = 29.0672

MOL WT WET STACK GASE:

Mws = 27.6425

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION

An = 1.3690E-3

96 ISO e 97.9395 

### STACK VELOCITY DRY STACK FLOW RATE Vs e 9.8765 O(std) = 2.3693E+6 Kp 85.49 Vs = 9.8765

PARTICULATI CONCEIVTRATION

Cs = 1.6734E-3

Mn 66 Cs = 1.6734E-3 Ibs/dscf = 3.6892E-6 grains/dscf = 0.0258 Ibs/hr = 8.7407

FLUORIDE CONCENTRATION Cs = 3.6004E-4 Initlal Leak Check Rate Finish 117.975 Pitot Tubes Start 117.967 A = OK Rate = 0.0080 B = OK

Vac. = 23.6 Fnal Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes Finish 170.86 A = OK Start 170.853 B = OK Rate = 0.0070 Vac. - 19.8 Mn 14.2 Cs = 3.6004E-4 Ibs/dscf = 7.9374E-7 graina/dscf 0.0056 Ibs/hr = 1.8806

l/111 

### ~INLET EMISSIONS SUMIIAARY

Mass Emissions Calibration Bias Data

NOx (ppm) _ NOx (ppm bias correction) n NOx (Ibs/hr) 10.52 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) = 0.90 Zero Gas Post (ppm) e 0.00 10.08 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) 0 159.90 2.851 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) s 159.90 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) 0 160.50

Run 02 S02 (ppm) s 137.62 S02 (ppm bias correction) 0 137.82 S02 (Ibs/hr) 54.205 Run #!2 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) _ -0.30 Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.00 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 260.70 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 262.10 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 258.80OUTLET E1IAISSiONS SUMMARY

Mass Emissions Calibratlon Blas Data

NOx (ppm) - NOx (ppm bias correction) _ NOx (Ibs/hr) 10.91 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) = 0.50 Zero Gas Post (ppm) s 0.50 10.40 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 159.90 2.943 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 159.90 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 161.10

Run #2 S02 (ppm) a 25.52 S02 (ppm blas correction) = 26.16 S02 (Ibs/hr) 10.290 Run #2 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) _ -0.90 Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.30 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) a 163.50 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 162.80 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) _ 159.30



# //

~ 

# f

# American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

LABORATORY DATA 

## EPA Method 5 r

-- (—!Z Company: x-,?



# ~~ , 

# ~~ Run Number: Sampling Location: 

# ~

. 

## Date: _ / , ::P '/ -.0' 

# ~ /



## Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain Impinger 1 

# Sq 7. 0

2

- 

# 70 1 ' Impinger 2 

## 3 I' a ' z Impinger 3 -7 707 7 ~ 

## • o Impinger 4 7• 1 

## 7r e• -3 P. Z

Total Gain - I 

# Z 3. e'' Particulate Collected 

## Front - Half Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Filter and Oven Glassware) 6 ) . 7 y g s 1. Filter Fnal Weight o ~ 

## 2. Fifter Tare Weight • 7O '7 

## 3. Total Flter Weight D n

~ 

### (

~ 

### -o : Y ~ 

### • O 

# ~ 4. Particulate caught in 

## nozzle, probe and glassware 21. 6 5. Total Frorrt - Half Catch & 3• ~ ^~ 

## Back - Haif Analysis (impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 1. Particulate caught in impingers . evaporated down at less than 120° F. ~ 

## Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and Bacic - Half Catches) (' 6-o ^•?


### lb 

# ii~

# American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

/

. . _ D _, -

Source: 0! 

## ~ Run Number:

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

## (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Vofume Percent - Dry

' 

## Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Dixoide 

## Carbon

Monoxide



## • ~ d



## ~ /6 , 

# 7 cz r

z <

~ 

# o

~7 ~0- ~ /d-~ ?• ~ ` O '' 

# Average 

# ~ ~3~
~ L'• 

# ~~ a.`l 

# ~ l ~ ~ • 1

,~~AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT
1 Plant 2 City 3 Location 4 Operator 5 Date 6 Method and Run # 7 Stack Diameter (in) 8 Sample Box Number 9 Meter Box Number 10 Meter "H@ 11 Meter Calibration, Y 12 Pitot Tube, Cp 13 Probe Length (ft) 14 Probe Liner Materiai 15 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 16 Ambient Temperature (°F) 17 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 18 Assumed Moisture (°/a) 19 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) 20 C Factor 21 Reference ^P (in H20) 22 Nozzle Identification Number 23 Nozzle Diameter (in) 24 Thermometer Number 25 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 26 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 27 Filter Number 28 Gas Analysis 29 CO (%) 30 C 0 2 (e) 31 02 (%) 32 N2 (%) Interstate Brick West Jordan, Utah #4 Kin David Hunt Tuesday, 6 December 1994 EPA 5 & 13B - #3 Compliance

135.69 RAC #2 RAC #2824 1.613 0.917 0.8401 11'-A Stainiess 248 43 25.22 15 0.01 0 0.023 1/2 - #12 0.501 1-A 0.0090 20.7 K-6

0 2.47 16.70 80.83~ I:Ta ~ _ 1 • .

NOaLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH Dn = 0.501 AH - 0.6033

constant 0.0357 

### am 0.75 Pb(in HG) 25.22 Pgm(in H20) 0.01 Pm 25.2207 CP 0.8401 Tm(°F) 70 Tm(°R) 530 

### Bwm 0 Bws 0.15 Ts(°F) 125 Ts(°R) . 585 Mds 29.0632 Ms 27.4037 Pb(in HG) 25.22 Pgs(in H20) 0.01 Ps 25.2207 

### (AP)avg 0.023 Dn = 0.5025 Cp 0.8401 Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 Gel H20(g) 12.0000 V(1-120)(ml) 127.8000 Vm(acfl 49.2300 "h avg 0.2000 Vwc 6.0155 Vmc 37.9158 Bws = 0.1369 constant 849.8000 ^ H@ 1.0000 Mds 29.0632 Mm 29.0632 K 26.2314 AP 0.0230 AH = 0.6033

` 

## ~ dSample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference ( ° F) ( ° F) ( ° F) (ft3) (ft3) starting 171.228 1 76 77 122 173.178 1.95 2 76 77 121 175.184 2.01 3 77 79 122 177.223 2.04 4 77 82 121 179.314 2.09 5 78 85 122 181.475 2.1.6 6 78 85 121 183.673 2.20 7 79 87 122 185.876 2.20 8 79 89 122 188.082 2.21 9 80 92 121 190.262 2.18 10 81 95 122 192.421 2.16 11 83 97 122 194.624 2.20 12 84 99 121 196.846 2.22 13 85 101 121 199.075 2.23 14 87 103 122 201.289 2.21 15 88 103 122 203.496 2.21 16 89 105 121 205.774 2.28 17 91 107 118 207.992 2.22 18 91 107 120 210.262 2.27 19 92 107 121 212.484 2.22 20 87 104 122 214.701 2.22 21 87 105 121 216.913 2.21 22 88 105 121 219.195 2.28 23 89 107 121 221.358 2.16 24 90 107 120 223.496 2.14 25 91 107 121 225:611 2.11

avg °F 90.30 121.20 avg °R 550.30 581.20

total 

### = 54.3830 54.38 average 

### = 84.12 96.48 121.20 Sample Meter Meter Stack Ges Gas Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm VmVelocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Head Diff ^Ps Time Time ^Ps "H (in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in H ) 9 1400 0.019 0.82 0.1378 3 1403 3.8 0.02 0.86 0.1414 3 1406 4 0.021 0.91 0.1449 3 1409 4.1 0.022 0.95 0.1483 3 1412 4.2 0.024 1.04 0.1549 3 1415 4.4 0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1430 4.5 0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1433 4.5 0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1436 4.5 0.024 1.05 0.1549 3 1439 4.4 0.024 1.06 0.1549 3 1442 4.4 0.025 1.10 0.1581 3 1450 4.5 0.025 1.11 0.1581 3 1453 4.5 0.025 1.11 0.1581 3 1456 4.6 0.024 1.07 0.1549 3 1459 4.6 0.024 1.07 0.1549 3 1502 4.6 0.025 1.12 0.1581 3 1508 4.6 0.024 1.08 0.1549 3 1511 4.5 0.025 1.13 0.1581 3 1514 4.6 0.024 1.08 0.1549 3 1517 4.5 0.024 1.07 0.1549 3 1520 4.5 0.024 1.07 0.1549 3 1530 4.5 0.025 1.12 0.1581 3 1533 4.6 0.023 1.03 0.1517 3 1536 4.4 0.022 0.99 0.1483 3 1539 4.3 0.021 0.94 0.1449 3 1542 4.2

75 75 0.0236 1.0423 0.1534 3 1469.04 4.41 

### Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Head Diff "Ps Time Time APs AH



### ~ ~~Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point Exit Outlet Isokinetics ( ° F) ( ° F) ( ° F)
234 233 48 9.0374 99.35 235 234 48 9.2642 99.54 236 235 48 9.5011 98.59 235 236 48 9.7164 98.47 234 235 48 10.1571 97.22 235 234 47 10.3577 96.82 235 235 47 10.3666 96.88 234 235 47 10.3666 96.86 236 236 47 10.1484 97.29 236 236 47 10.1571 96.12 234 235 49 10.3666 95.81 236 235 50 10.3577 96.32 235 236 49 10.3577 96.39 236 237 49 10.1571 97.49 241 244 49 10.1571 97.10 243 246 50 10.3577 97.90 237 243 49 10.1222 96.72 237 238 48 10.3487 97.17 239 240 49 10.1484 97.07 238 237 49 10.1571 97.54 239 238 49 10.1484 97.16 237 237 49 10.3577 98.15 236 238 50 9.9347 96.74 238 239 50 9.7080 97.60 241 240 50 9.4930 98.82

236.68 236.68 48.56 Probe Exit Filter Outfet Impinger Temperature Temperature Temperature (°F) (°F) (°F)



## i ti1POST TEST I CALCULATION

VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME 1-120 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT Vm(std) = 40.3321 Vw(std) 0 5.7143 Bws = 0.1241

Vm 54.3830 Vm(std) = 40.3321 Vic(mis) 121.4 Vw(std) = 5.7143

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE'

Mds = 29.0632

MOL WT WET STACK GASE:

Mws = 27.6903

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION

An - 1.3690E-3

% ISO = 97.3883 

### STACK VELOCITY DRY STACK FLOW RATE Vs a 10.0498 0(std) = 2.4369E+6 Kp 85.49 Vs = 10.0498

PARTICULATI CONCENTRATION

Cs = 2.1373E-3

Mn 86.2 Cs = 2.1373E-3 Ibs/dscf = 4.7118E-6 grains/dscf = 0.0330 Ibs/hr = 11.4822

FLUORIDE CONCElVTRATION Cs - 3.7687E-4 Initial Leak Check Rate Finish 171.135 Pitot Tubes Start 171.126 A a OK Rate = 0.0090 B = OK

Vac. = 20.7 Finai Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes Finish 225.941 A = OK Start 225.932 B = OK Rate = 0.0090 Vac. a 18.6 Mn 15.2 Cs = 3.7687E-4 Ibs/dscf = 8.3085E-7 grains/dscf 0.0058 Ibs/hr = 2.0247



### ~a~-INLET EMISSIONS SUMMARY

Mass Emissions Calibration Bias Data

8.58 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) a 0.00 Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.00 8.59 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 159.90 2.498 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 160.50 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 159.10 F~-~~ i < NOx (ppm) _ NOx (ppm bias correction) _ NOx (Ibs/hr)

Run #3 S02 (ppm) = 181.92 S02 (ppm bias correction) = 182.29 S02 (Ibs/hr) 73.744 Run 43 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) = 0.00 Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.30 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 260.70 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) m 258.80 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 261.40

} rpOUTLET EMISSiONS SUMMARY

Mass Emisslons Caiibration Bias Data

NOx (ppm) a NOx (ppm bias correctlon)

~ NOx (Ibs/hr) 8.45 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) e 0.50 Zero Gas Post (ppm) m 0.00 8.25 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 159.90 2.402 Cai Gas Pretest (ppm) = 161.10 Cal Gas Post test (ppm) a 157.10

Run #3 S02 (ppm) e 29.36 S02 (ppm bias correctlon) = 29.71 S02 (Ibs/hr) 12.018 Run i13 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) = 0.30 Zero Gas Post (ppm) a -0.20 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) a 163.50 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) n 159.30 Cai Gas Post test (ppm) a 163.40



# 1a,

~ 

# f ,

# American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

LABORATORY DATA 

### EPA Method 5

~ 

## Company: Sampling Location: Run Number: 

## #-3 ~ 

## f//f f( 3 ~ 

## Date: lZ ' e" 7y

Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain Impinger 1 ~~' ~ ^ ~ 7. 

## 9 % ~ 

### lmpinger 2 

## 0 -1 1 

# q , Impinger 3 

## So 1 ~ • `~ ~ . 3 

### Impinger 4 7~ - 3


### Total Gain =
Particulate Collected 

## Front - Half Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Filter and Oven Glassware)
1. Filter Final Weight 2. Filter Tare Weight 3. Totai Flter Weight 4. Particulate caught in nozzle, probe and glassware 

## 5. Total Front - Half Catch 

# 6 .

- 76- ~.~ g 

### p,

~ 

### - c A • d S 7 = S'7. 215 

## ,

~ 3 

## 4 

## Back - Half Analysis (Impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 1. Particulate caught in impingers 

## evaporated down at less than 120° F. 

## Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and Bacic - Half Catches)
S~ -Z
- j



# i~

## . 

# American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South 8irch Drive Spanish Forfc, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

Company: 

## Date: 

# /Z

Source: 0~ ~, 

## Run Number: 

# A-, 3

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

## (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry

' 

## Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Dixoide 

## Carbon

Monoxide 

## '
~ 

## `
~ 

## G • ~ ~l ~ 

## Z. S ~ ~ ~ 

## . 1 

# zc

z - L/ 

# Average

~ 

# v . 1p 3 16. 7 Z . ~1 ~ ~ L ~ • ~



# `oZzo

### AMEAICAN ENVIRONMENRAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 8o 1-266-7111



### Spanish Forfc, Uffih 8assa
POST TEST BACiC HALF EVAPORATION

COMPANY 

### _~,4~s~C SOURCE: DATE:



### ACFTONE BLANK Volume of Uquld : 

### Flnal Weight 1 a 6./s mf ' ? Tare Weight /o F .ro 11 Residue C. o o O 2.

RUN #1 Volume of Llquid

Color Final Weight Tare Weight Residue dc Blank

- Blank Residue ?

- 

## 78f /`I

104. . 765-3 -

~ 

### .od'(o¢

RUN #2 Volume of LJquid 

### ?,po ... !s

Color Final Weight 

### gy, ? Tare Weight

1: 

### 19. 7 L 3 S ^ Residue A Blank lo. 

### o 2 f S"

- Blank ip . A oo Z Residue 

### O. O 2-1 S- _- 

### 1 f• G'` - ?
RUN 43 Volume of Uquid

Color Flnal Weight Tare Weight Residue & Blank

- Blank Residue 

### IfJ?. Fr 7/ T

/ D 2i, Er ¢.Sef 

## o . y Zro4ffl.oOaZo, o z(o Z 

### 2G•L

~ 

### .



# )

~ 

# 1

### AMERICAN ETVVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111



### Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

POST TEST BAClC HALF EVAPORATION

COMPANY: SOURCE: ~ t4 (Gil•n 

### DATE: 

### / z 4 :;/y y

CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER 42 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 

### DISTILLED WATER



### BLANK BLANK Volume of Llquio Z o D M/S 

### Volume of Llqul, 

### 3 10° "` 5 Finai Weigtt 1 0 2 - 

### 5 , S 3 3 Final Weigh 4? 9 1

. 

### 71 G•t Tare Weighi / a 2•k5-3 i Taro Weighl 5• 77 6 Residw ~.°~~ 1 Residue O.O Z

RUN #'t RUN #1 Volume of Liquii ~- d~ "'~ ~ Volume of Liqui , 'Z O'D r'- I S

Colol Colol r/C r 

### Final Weiglt lo Z• 2— 

### Fnal Weigh f5• 7 66 5 - Taro Weight l d Z' •k4 2 2 - Tare WeigM 7 G 3 / Residue & Blanl CO . m 0/0 Residue & Blani O.O O/e{

- BIanM D- O o O I - BIanM O. O O O L Residue y y Residue o. o o Z.... ~

RUN #2 RUN 42 Volume of Llquii ~~ ~~ `` 1 S Volume of LJqui,

Coloi G Coloi Final WeiglT e9 S
- • 21 

### b 2 Fnal Weigh T

- S. 7 5 l r Taro WeigM '~ r• 2 - I-S - Taro Weighi `J '

~ 1 • 7`100 Residue 3 Blanl co• d o l'l- Residue & Blartl D.0 0/S

- BIanM L-7-L9

o d 1 - 81anM O. O O O Z Residue (D -C O Residue D• d O/.3 /. 3 ~~
RUN 43 RUN 43 Volume of Uqu10 ';I ~ 0 Volume of Liqui, 2. o O-% !s

Colol C t e COlol G/ e — Final WeiglT 

### ly- 20 4 tiO Final Weigh 

### /O 2 - 7 2 4'T Taro Weighi 

### mol 

## i @ 

## 10 M



## E Taro Weight 

## !o z• sr233 Resldue & Bianl Z ) - O 4 I r Residue 8< Blani 10 • o O( Co

- BIanM O. 0

4 d/ - BIanM f7 - 006 2- Residue Q• 4 O l< 4 /.~.~ j Residue o. 0 0 1y 

### /. #
~. ~



# m'Va .. .:._3.lcS9 ~s~ GNVe.v

~ 4:_. ~_ ~ •- :'.

~ •:. •. , es. 'w ~

00 00 •*0•00 

# .•:•:':•:•

~ 

# :: Mountain States Analytical The Qualify Solution 

### American Environmental Testing 565 South Birch Dr. Spanish Fork, DT 84660

Attn: Mr. Brett Lindsay Project: Interstate Brick #4 Kiln Sample ID: Run #1 Matrix: Waste Water
Results Test Analysis as Received

---- -------- ------------- 

### 0263 Fluoride, Selective Ion Electrode 18.1 Method: EPA 340.2 MSAI Sample: 27756 MSAI Group: 6751 Date Reported: 12/12/94 Discard Date: 01/11/95 Date Submitted: 12/07/94 Date Sampled: 12/05/94 

### Collected by: Purchase Order: Project No.:

Limit of IInits Quantitation

----- ------------ 

### mg/l 0.2

Respectfully Submitted, Reviewed and Approved by:

Mark W. Bostrom 

### Project Manager
1645 West 2200 South, Satt Lake Cily, Utah 84119 ( 801)973-0050 1-800-973-MSAI FAX (801)973-6278

! ✓ / { M E®~~~~e~a~~~'~ ~'a ,t - - ~

~.~. a i

~ .z=; ~ ..>.

F

. ... ~ . ~ ....... . rv ... -, :.. ~ > .. ,. • ... .. ,:. ~ „ f ~

.

~~
~ •~ •~•~~ 

# .•:•:':•:• ~ 

# : Mountain States Anafytical The Quality So/utlon 

### American Environmental Testing 565. South Birch Dr. Spanish Fork, LTY 84660

Attn: Mr. Brett Lindsay Project: Interstate Brick #4 Kiln Sample ID: Run #2 Matrix: Waste Water
Results Test Analysis as Received

---- -------- ------------- 

### 0263 Fluoride, Selective Ion Electrode 14.2 Method: EPA 340.2 MSAI Sample: 27757 MSAI Group: 6751 Date Reported: 12/12/94 Discard Date: 01/11/95 Date Submitted: 12/07/94 Date Sampled: 12/06/94 Collected by: Purchase Order: Project No.:

Limi t of 

### Units Quantitation

----- ------------ 

### me/l 0.2

Respectfully Submitted, Reviewed and Approved by: 

# J ~~~~~
Mark W. Bostrom Project Manager
1645 West 2200 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 ( 801)973-0050 1-800-973-MSAI FAX (801)973-6278

/ V 0 M E®A ~ a:

~ •.: - . . ~y~~` t ~ ~

~. ~• •~.~• 

# . :•:':•:
~ 

# :. Mountain States Anaiytical The Qualfty Solution 

### American Environmental Testing 565 South Birch Dr. Spanish Fork, UT 84660

Attn: Mr. Brett Lindsay Project: Interstate Brick #4 Kiln Sample ID: Run #3 Matrix: Waste Water
Results Test Analysis as Received

---- -------- ------------- 

### 0263 Fluoride, Selective Ion Electrode 15.2 Method: EPA 340.2 MSAI Sample: 27758 MSAI Group: 6751 Date Reported: 12/12/94 Discard Date: 01111195 Date Submitted: 12/07/94 Date Sampled: 12/06/94 Collected by: Purchase Order: Project No.:

Limit of Units Quantitation

----- ------------ mg/l 0.2



### Respectfully Submitted, Reviewed and Approved by:

~ 

# ;y y

~ 

# i b i 

# ) 

# ~ Mark W. Bostrom Project Manager
1645 West 2200 South, SaU Lake Cily, Utah 84119 ( 801)973-0050 1-800-973-MSAI FAX (801)973-6278

/ 

# "sL M E®ti` ~ ; ~ ~ "~ a~`~W`~ k~.~ .'<°•a ~"~ ~

~ " °~~ .a'! • ` ~ ~
,. .u•
•. ~~ ~~~ ., ny ~~w~g'~~a R} A~~ 4 ~~_ c d'~ °

.. ~ !',.. 3Po
~~~ ' d., a^,. ,~~ ..3 .;a''-

_ ~ r .w , ~~ ~- ~~ C ~r~" ~

~ 

# A •0.-00 

# .•:•:':•:• 0 :. Mountain States Analytical
7he Quality Solution



### Test Analysis 0263 Fluoride, Selective Ion Electrode Method: EPA 340.2 MSAI Sample: 27759 MSAI Group: 6751 Date Reported: 12/12/94 Discard Date: 01/11/95 Date Submitted: 12/07/94 Date Sampled: 12/05/94 Collected by: Purchase Order: Project No.:

Results • Limit of as Received IInits Quantitation

------------- ----- ------------ . ND mg/l 0.2 

### American Environmental Testing 565 South Birch Dr. Spanish Fork, iJT 84660



### Attn: Mr. Brett Lindsay Project: Interstate Brick #4 Kiln Sample ID: Blank Matrix: Waste Water

ND - Not detected at the limit of quantitation Respectfully Submitted, Reviewed and Approved by:

Mark W. Bostrom 1 Project Manager
1645 West 2200 South, Salt Lake Cily, Utah 84119 ( 801)973-0050 1-800-973-MSAI FAX (801)973-6278

/ V 

# ~ ME®

### PRETEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201A 

### TEST SITE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse RUN #: #1 Compliance

Pbar Pg Ts Tm in Hg in H20 °F °F 25.23 -1.5 50 90

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient 

### % % % °F 0.1 20.8 79.1 40

total run time # of points oPavg aP1 min in H20 in H20 60 12 2.36 2.3 

## . .

.. ~ 

## _ .

DATE: 12J6/94

B(ws) Al-I@ Meter fraction in H20 0.02 1.748 Cp(2) Cp(201 A) dimensionless dimensionless 0.8394 0.8394


### Yi stadc area meter coef ft2 0.998 0.785

Md Mw Ps μs Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 28.848 28.631 25.120 174.831

Qs AH OH(-50) AH(+50) f0min in H20 in H20 in H20 0.4482 0.557 0.685 0.462.

Pretest Pitots Finish 676.02 + ok Start 676.018 - ok 0.002 Vacuum 18.6 Posttest Pitots Finish 704.977 + ok Start 704.975 - ok 0.002 

### Vacuum 19



## ~ .nozzle Dn oPmn oPmx #

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0232 2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0329 3 0.3937 0.0053 0.0481 4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0734 5 0.3150 0.0130 0.1174 6 0.2756 0.0223 0.1819 7 0.2362 0.0413 0.3013 8 0.2165 0.0797 0.4066 9 0.1969 0.1437 0.5695 10 0.1772 0.2515 0.8368 11 0.15 0.5540 1.5642 12 0.135 0.8844 2.3420 13 'Error' •Error• 14 'Error' 'Error• 15 'Error` 'Error'

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx in ft/sec ff/sec ft/sec ft/sec

1 0.47 6.14 'Error' 3.07 12.58 2 0.43 7.30 `Error' 3.65 13.87 3 0.39 8.84 'Error' 4.42 15.56 4 0.35 10.91 'Error' 5.46 17.84 5 0.32 13.80 'Error' 6.90 21.04 6 0.28 18.03 'Error' 9.02 25.77 7 0.24 24.55 11.88 12.27 33.17 8 0.22 29.22 17.06 14.61 38.53 9 0.20 35.33 22.91 17.66 45.60 10 0.18 43.62 30.30 21.81 55.27 11 0.15 60.87 44.97 30.44 75.57 12 0.14 75.15 56.82 37.58 92.47 13 0.00 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 14 0.00 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 15 0.00 'Error• 'Error• 'Error' •Error'



# I 

# 34Vmxc oPmn oPmnc aPmx APmxc An

ft/sec in H20 in H20 in H20 in H20 ft2 choose largest choose smallest 9.21 'Enror' 0.0026 0.04 0.0232 1.2172E-3 10.95 'Error' 0.0037 0.05 0.03 1.0231 E-3 13.25 'Error' 0.0053 0.07 0.05 8.4539E-4 16.37 'Error' 0.0082 0.09 0.07 6.8465E-4 20.71 'Error' 0.0130 0.12 0.12 5.4119E-4 27.05 'Error' 0.0223 0.18 0.20 4.1427E-4 36.82 0.04 0.0413 0.30 0.37 3.0429E-4 43.83 0.08 0.0585 0.41 0.53 2.5565E-4 52.99 0.14 0.0855 0.57 0.77 2.1146E-4 65.43 0.25 0.1303 0.84 1.17 1.7126E-4 91.31 0.55 0.25 1.56 2.28 1.2272E-4 112.73 0.88 0.39 2.34 3.48 9.9402E-5 •Error' 'Error• 'En•or• 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' `En•or• 'Error' 'Error` 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' `Error' 'Error'



## ~~TEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201A TEST SITE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse Date: 12094 RUN #: #1 Compliance START: 1120 STOP: 1220
point # AP(201 A) dwell act time Ts Tmo

in H20 min decimal °F °F

1 2.2 4.94 5 47 65 2 2.3 5.05 5 44 68 3 2.4 5.16 5.25 47 70 4 2.1 4.82 5 46 73 5 2.3 5.05 5 45 75 6 2.2 4.94 5 46 78 7 2 4.71 4.75 47 81 8 2.3 5.05 5 49 83 9 2.1 4.82 5 45 85 10 2.3 5.05 5 43 87 11 2.2 4.94 5 41 89 12 2.3 5.05 5 41 90

total 59.5 avg 2.22 60.00 45.08 78.67 Actual Time: 60.00 Average Meter Temp: 84.67



# 3V

# American Environmental Testing Company, lnc.

' S55 South Binch Drive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111 -


## L.ABORATO RY DATA 

## EPA Method 201A Company:

-1K ~ 

### ,-s
~ 

### «{e ~j~~k 

## Run Number. 

## Sa mpl[ng Locatlo n

: 

### .6 rr c k 

## Molsture Collected



## . Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain Impinger 1 ,576 - 6 S76 • 8 

## r o. z. Impinger 2 

# +>>. 1 Impinger 3 

## y Z 6•` 1 yz 6-7 +- o• 3 

## impinger4 +

~ 

### -i.y


## Total G 

## = ZZ. ° ~ 

## Particutate Collected

Plrl

- 

## 10 Particsbts Lauaer Than P!i

- 

## 10 Particutale 

## 1. Filter Flnal Weight: • o.Z y Z 

## Acet ~ Wash Mg 2. Fifter Tane Weight: o - 19 ss ' 

## B " ~ 

## 3. Net Fltter Wefght:

- to . o o ► 7 

## 4. Acetone Wash Mg: / . ~ •;- s 

## S. Total PM-10 Mg: ~ 3 • ~^~



## 8acic 1-talf ADnlMII Total PM-1 0 Particvtat• cwh irft Particulate Caught In Impingers Mg.



# 13

~ 

# 7Tmi Tov Vm vacuum AI-I SqRt OP

°F . °F ft3 in Hg in H20 676.075 65 250 678.634 1.3 0.557 0.0000 70 250 680.992 1.3 0.557 0.0000 82 250 683.476 1.3 0.557 0.0000 86 248 685.823 1.4 0.557 0.0000 90 248 688.188 1.4 0.557 0.0000 93 247. 690.573 1.4 0.557 1.4832 96 245 692.845 1.4 0.557 1.4142 98 243 695.235 1.4 0.557 1.5166 100 244 697.638 1.4 0.557 1.4491 101 241 700.048 1.4 0.557 1.5166 103 240 702.448 1.4 0.557 1.4832 104 243 704.869 1.4 0.557 1.5166

28.79 90.67 245.75 1.37 0.5570 0.8650

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 22 1.04 0.04 25.23 -1.50

ps μs Vmds (23 Mw D50 in Hg mP ft3 ft3Jmin μm 25.12 171.91 23.48 0.47 28.3898 9.6130

Average Dn An Vs Iso as in ft2 ft/sec % 0.135 9.9108E-5 52.24 150.18 1.2409E+5
Total Mg Cs Cs Emr mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 5.0 4.6944E-7 0.0033 0.06



# ~ 3~DATE: 1216/94

B(ws) aH@ Meter fraction in H20 0.02 1.748 Cp(2) Cp(201 A) dimensionless dimensioniess 0.8394 0.8394


### Y stadc area meter coef ft2, 0.998 0.785 

### PRETEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201A 

### TEST SITE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse RUN #: #2 Compliance

Pbar Pg Ts Tm in Hg in H20 °F °F 25.23 -1.5 50 90

CO2 

### .02 N2 +CO Tambient % % % 

### °F 0.1 20.8 79.1 

### 40

total run time # of points 

### APavg AP1 min in H20 in H20 

### 60 12 2.36 2.3



### Md 

## Mw Ps is Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 28.848 28.631 25.120 174.831



### as AH AH(-50) OH(+50) ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 0.4482 0.557 0.685 0.462

Pretest Pitots Finish 705.056 + ok Start 705.054 - ok 0.002 Vacuum 18.6 

### Posttest Pitots Finish 733.863 + ok Start 733.861 - ok 0.002 

### Vacuum 19

A3 

# ~ ,nozzle Dn APmn oPmx

~
1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0232 2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0329 3 0.3937 0.0053 0.0481 4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0734 5 0.3150 0.0130 0.1174 6 0.2756 0.0223 0.1819 7 0.2362 0.0413 0.3013 8 0.2165 0.0797 0.4066 9 0.1969 0.1437 0.5695 10 0.1772 0.2515 0.8368 11 0.15 0.5540 1.5642 12 0.135 0.8844 2.3420 

### 13 'Error• 'Error' 14 'Error' 'Error' 15 'Error' •Error'

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx in ft/sec ftlsec ftlsec ft/seo

1 0.47 6.14 'Error' 3.07 12.58 2 0.43 7.30 'Error' 3.65 13.87 3 0.39 8.84 'Error' 4.42 15.56 4 0.35 10.91 'Error' 5.46 17.84 5 0.32 13.80 'Error' 6.90 21.04 6 0.28 18.03 'Error' 9.02 25.77 7 0.24 24.55 11.88 12.27 33.17 8 0.22 29.22 17.06 14.61 38.53 9 0.20 35.33 22.91 17.66 45.60 10 0.18 43.62 30.30 21.81 55.27 11 0.15 60.87 44.97 30.44 75.57 12 0.14 75.15 56.82 37.58 92.47 13 0.00 'Error• 'Error` 'Error' •Error' 14 0.00 'Error' 'Error' `En

- or' 'Error' 15 0.00 'Error' 'Error• 'Error• 'Error•



# ADVmxc OPmn OPmnc ePmx APmxc An

fUsec in H20 in H20 in H20 in H20 ft2

choose largest choose smallest 9.21 'Error' 0.0026 0.04 0.0232 12172E-3 10.95 'Error' 0.0037 0.05 0.03 1.0231 E-3 13.25 'Error' 0.0053 0.07 0.05 8.4539E-4 16.37 'Error' 0.0082 0.09 0.07 6.8465E-4 20.71 'Error' 0.0130 0.12 0.12 5.4119E-4 27.05 `Error' 0.0223 0.18 0.20 4.1427E-4 36.82 0.04 0.0413 0.30 0.37 3.0429E-4 43.83 0.08 0.0585 0.41 0.53 2.5565E-4 52.99 0.14 0.0855 0.57 0.77 2.1146E-4 65.43 0.25 0.1303 0.84 1.17 1.7126E-4 91.31 0.55 0.25 1.56 2.28 1.2272E-4 112.73 0.88 0.39 2.34 3.48 9.9402E-5 'Error• 'Error• 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' •Error• 'Error' 'Error' •Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 'Error'



## ~~ 

# 1

### TEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201 A 

### TEST S1TE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse Date: 12/6/94 RUN #: #2 Compliance START: 1310 STOP: 1410 point # AP(201A) dweil act time Ts Tmo

in H20 min decimal °F °F

1 2.3 4.94 5 45 87 2 2.2 4.83 5 47 87 3 2.3 4.94 5 50 87 4 2 4.60 4.75 50 88 5 2.4 5.04 5 49 89 6 2.3 4.94 5 51 90 7 2.1 4.72 4.75 50 93 8 2.2 4.83 5 50 94 9 2 4.60 4.75 51 95 10 2.2 4.83 5 50 96 11 2.3 4.94 5 52 97 12 2.2 4.83 - 5 53 97

total 58.0 avg 2.21 59.25 49.83 91.67 Actual Time: 59.25 Average Meter Temp: 96.54



# I


# ~ 2"Tmi Tov Vm vacuum NH SqRt AP °F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 705.136 87 245 707.546 1.3 0.557 0.0000 90 248 709.933 1.3 0.557 0.0000 94 251 712.341 1.3 0.557 0.0000 98 250 714.614 1.3 0.557 0.0000 101 246 717.021 1.3 0.557 0.0000 103 248 719.458 1.3 0.557 1.5166 105 243 721.744 1.4 0.557 1.4491 107 250 724.174 1.4 0.557 1.4832 108 244 726.487 1.4 0.557 1.4142 108 244 728.922 1.4 0.557 1.4832 108 245 731.347 1.4 0.557 1.5166 108 247 733.785 1.4 0.557 1.4832
28.65 101.42 246.75 1.35 0.5570 0.8622

POSTTEST CALCIJLATIONS

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 19.1 0.90 0.04 25.23 -1.50

Ps μs Vmds 

### as Mw D50 in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min μm 25.12 173.47 22.86 0.46 28.4376 9.7539

Average Dn An Vs 

### Iso as in ft2 ft/sec % 0.135 9.9108E-5 52.27 148.70 1.2357E+5
Total Mg Cs Cs 

### Emr mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 4.7 4.5318E-7 0.0032 0.06



# /W-3

# American Environmental Testing Company, Inc.

` ' 565 South Birch Drive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111



## LJIBORATO RY DATA 

## EPA Method 201 A Company: fc , ~. ~, u~ ~f 

## Run Number. ~~ ~ a»~,~ 

## P Q„ e, ~ 

### Sampiing Location: (y - 

### Date: 

## 6- q y



## inittal Weight ..5- 1 

## Finai Weight 

## Weight Galn 

# ,Z
filZ•

~ 

### 1 

# t' O - l Impinger 1 ° Impinger 2 Impinger 3 Impinger 4 ,~ 

## - 76 , >.



## 7z0 • f ss - 3. ~



## 7?4, . 2
Tota I Ga in Particuiate Collected



## Laryer Tian PU -10 Particudale 

## Acetone Wash Mg [' ii — - 

## 1. Fitter Final Weight: • 

### o. I 9 7 6 

## 2. Fifter Tare Weight: o- / 9 so 

## ,6- Z 3. Net Filter Weight: a.0 0 / b - /. 6 ..- ~ 

## 4. Acetone Wash Mg: /• ~~ 

## S. Tota 1 PM-10 Mg: 3 •~~' ~



## ftcic liatt Analrsl ~ 

### • '
~ 

### ;c. - - -

~ 

### ` -- i = 

## - Particulate Caught in Impingers Mg. l r • 7 4'`7 

# IqAB(ws) eH@ Meter fraction in H20 0.02 1.748 Cp(2) Cp(201 A) dimensionless dimensionless 0.8394 0.8394

Y 

### stadc area meter coef ft2 0.998 0.785 

### PRETEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201 A TEST SITE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse RUN #: #3 Compliance

Pbar Pg Ts Tm in Hg in H20 °F °F 25.23 -1.5 50 90

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient % % % °F 0.1 20.8 79.1 40

total run time # of points APavg AP1 min in H20 in H20 60 12 2.36 2.3 DATE: 12/6194

Md Mw Ps μs Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 28.848 28.631 25.120 174.831

as AH AH(-50) oH(+50) ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 0.4482 0.557 0.685 0.462

Pretest Pitots Finish 734.234 + ok Start 734.232 - ok 0.002 Vacuum 18.2 Posttest Pitots Finish 763.425 + ok Start 763.423 - ok 0.002 

### Vacuum 19



## ~~~nozzle Dn APmn OPmx #

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0232 2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0329 3 0.3937 0.0053 0.0481 4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0734 5 0.3150 0.0130 0.1174 6 0.2756 0.0223 0.1819 7 0.2362 0.0413 0.3013 8 0.2165 0.0797 0.4066 9 0.1969 0.1437 0.5695 10 0.1772 0.2515 0.8368 11 0.15 0.5540 1.5642 12 0.135 0.8844 2.3420 13 'Error• •Error' 14 •Error' •Error' 15 'Error' •Error`

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx in ft/sec fUsec fvsec fVsec

1 0.47 6.14 'Error' 3.07 12.58 2 0.43 7.30 'Error' 3.65 13.87 3 0.39 8.84 'Error' 4.42 15.56 4 0.35 10.91 'Error' 5.46 17.84 5 0.32 13.80 'Error' 6.90 21.04 6 0.28 18.03 *Error' 9.02 25.77 7 0.24 24.55 11.88 12.27 33.17 8 0.22 29.22 17.06 14.61 38.53 9 0.20 35.33 22.91 17.66 45.60 10 0.18 43.62 30.30 21.81 55.27 11 0.15 60.87 44.97 30.44 75.57 12 0.14 75.15 56.82 37.58 92.47 13 0.00 *Error• *Error' *Error• *Error' 14 0.00 'Error• •Error' 'Error• 'Error• 15 0.00 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' •Error•Vmxc

ff/sec

9.21 10.95 13.25 16.37 20.71 27.05 36.82 43.83 52.99 65.43 91.31 112.73 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' oPmn oPmnc

in H20 in H20 

### choose largest 'Error• 0.0026 •Error• 0.0037 'Error' 0.0053 'Error' 0.0082 'Error' 0.0130 'Error' 0.0223 0.04 0.0413 0.08 0.0585 0.14 0.0855 0.25 0.1303 0.55 0.25 0.88 0.39 

### 'Error• `Error• •Error' 

### •Error' 'Error• 

### `Error' OPmx APmxc in H20 in H20 

### choose smallest 0.04 0.0232 0.05 0.03 0.07 0.05 0.09 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.20 0.30 0.37 0.41 0.53 0.57 o.77 0.84 1.17 1.56 2.26 2.34 3.48 'Error• 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 

## An ft2

1.2172E-3 1.0231 E-3 8.4539E-4 6.8465E-4 5.4119E-4 4.1427E-4 3.0429E-4 2.5565E-4 2.1146E-4 1.7126E-4 1.2272E-4 9.9402E-5



## ~T~

## TEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201 A 

### TEST SITE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse Date: 12/6/94 RUN #: #3 Compliance START: 1500 STOP: 1016
point # aP(201 A) dwell aci time Ts Tmo

in H20 min decimal °F °F

1 2.2 4.94 5 50 89 2 2.3 5.05 5 51 89 3 2.4 5.16 5.25 52 89 4 2.1

. 4.82 5 52 90 5 2.3 5.05 5 52 90 6 2.2 . 4.94 5 52 92 7 2 4.71 4.75 52 93 8 2.3 5.05 5 50 94 9 2,2 4.94 5 51 95 10 2.1 4.82 5 52 96 11 2.2 4.94 5 51 97 12 2.3 5.05 5 51 98

total 59.4 avg 2.22 60.00 51.33 92.67 Actual T' ime: 60.00 Average Meter Temp: 97.29



# I~~Tmi Tov Vm vacuum oH SqRt AP °F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 

### 734.314 89 244 736.732 1.3 0.557 0.0000 91 251 739.126 1.3 0.557 0.0000 96 251 741.664 1.3 0.557 0.0000 99 247 743.947 1.3 0.557 0.0000 98 249 746.483 1.3 0.557 0.0000 104 248 748.891 1.3 0.557 1.4832 105 250 751.187 1.4 0.557 1.4142 106 249 753.609. 1.4 0.557 1.5166 108 248 756.029 1.4 0.557 1.4832 108 248 758.442 1.4 0.557 1.4491 109 251 760.867 1.4 0.557 1.4832 110 250 763.297 1.4 0.557 1.5166

28.98 101.92 248.83 1.35 0.5570 0.8622

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 15.7 0.74 0.03 25.23 -1.50

Ps μs Vmds as Mw D50 

### in Hg mp fq fq/min μm 25.12 174.36 23.10 0.46 28.5117 9.8353

Average Dn An Vs Iso Cs in ft2 fvsec % dscFh 0.135 9.9108E-5 52.28 147.72 1.2411 E+5
Total AAg Cs Cs Emr mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 5.3 5.0582E-7 0.0035 0.06

//5 

# ~

## 1. Fiiter Finai Weight: • 0.2 0 5

~ (- 

## 2. Fitter Tane Weight: o• z o 6 y 

## 9-3 3. Net Fifter Weight: o- 0 OL Z L.-. ~ 

## 4. Acetone Wash Mg: /. 7 •^•s 

## S. Total PM-10 Mg: ?-r7 r ) 

## Larger Than PU -10 Rirttciiaft Acetone / Wash Mg 

# American Environmenta! Testing Company, Inc.
• 565 South Birch Drive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

LkBORATORY DATA 

## EPA Method 201A Company: ~'~ ~~ 

### siafe. 6 , -? e-k 

## Run Number. #

~ 

### 3 Co,. P/.

~ n ~ t 

## Sampling Location: A 

### 6 r
~ 

### ,- k 

## Cru .sk=r D $ t e: 8 41 d.& &" t



### MQisture Collected



## . InitEai Weight Finai Weight Weight Galn impinger 1 6 L4 

## Impinger2 3'

~ 

### a• 3 Syo • 5 

## Impinger 3 

## `fzG• 6 L(2.1. 9 

## Impinger 4 •72 6 • 2

- j L( ! • 

## Total Gain = 

# r+ 1 

# S• 7 Particutate Coitected



## Batic Ha)f Mahrsis

,~— 

## - Particuiate Caught in Impingers Mg.

. /- 

### ~ rs 57.

# American Environmental Testing ComQany, Inc. 565 So uth Birch D rive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84650 (801) 266-7111



## Company: v 

# ~ Cd 

## Date: _ l z

- 

## 6

- fy

Source: 

# Al ~ 

## &9 &,az Run Number: 

## ,d / - Z

- 

# t 3

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

## (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry



## Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Dixoide 

## Cartion

INonoxide

f



### - 

# 7q . I Z o, ® 

# ' 0 ~


# z - ~ 

# f. Zv.$ D- ~ 

# Lo.ol
3 ~~, ~ 

# Za .6 4v ' ° ( Average ~ ~l•~ 

# 20 . 8 d

. ~ 

# G v•0(

AS/

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive so 1-2ss-7111



### Spanish Foric, Utah $4660

POST TEST BACK HALF EVAPORATION

COMPANY: -~ :ee - < < t SOURCE: ,O~, Z 

### DATE:

~ 

### vG • frmi 2
t0 .Q 00 L



### L

ioZ.?Sf2t ~ 

### 7

- 7~4

,r~ . 0 0 Z. t • 

### o .aooZ A ETONE BLANK - Volume of Uquid

Finai Weight Tare Weight Residue

RUN #1 Volume of Uquid

Color Final Weight Tare Weight Residue dc Blank

- Blank 

### Residue

RUN #2 Volume of Uquid

Color Final Weight Tare Weight 

### Residue & Blank

- Blank Residue C.Cc.

~

tob.

~~~• ~ 

### i ¢7

/ 7 p 

### mS - /- S "}

_ RUN #3 Volume of Uquid



### Color Final Weight Tare Weight Resldue 8 Blank



### - Blank Residue "1,100 co ..... L S.



### Gi z— 

### 9't to 17 fr0 o ~ o o 1 .y tJ '10 0a 

### O .o O /7 

# 1{a

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111



### Spanish Foric, Utah 84660

POST TEST BACK HALF EVAPORATION

COMPANY: ~ •' ~ "r3'b`{

~ - '3 " ` c' L SOURCE: P ( ' ~•w
-- ~ cn- i Lc

~ i3

~ s

~ ,.... K
DATE: I'L 4 ` 1, 7



### CONTAINEA #1 CONTAINER #2 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 

### DISTILL.ED WATEFI



### BLANK BLANK Volume ot Llquio ~~ °"" Volume of Liqub Final Weigir /° s. ~ S3 3 Finai Weigh 1 7, 7 7 L.0 Tare Weight l9 2-• 1r s 3 L- Tare Weight

~ l7- 7 7 F"

~ Residue o• ~ / Residue d• o 0 o L

RUN #1 RUN #1 Voiume ot Liquii L S Voiume of Liquic -2 d O r" f S Coloi Coloe c t'C .r Final Weiglr ~5. ~i ~t ~ r Finai Weigh 1 , 0 G• 7 7 3 t Taro Weight `~ 5
~ O y? ~ Tare ' Weight / O(-.'7 7 Z/ Residue b Blanl 0 • D ~ fl , Residue & Blanl D• C &/ O

- BIanM 6. O O d 1 - Blanli .o Oo z Residue C • D

D O( o 

### B •

a~ Residue O- OOO 8- 0.`6 - Ga- S

RUN #2 Volume of Liquio

Coiol G tG ~ Final Weigtr 2 Taro Weight Z Residue if Blani t!:) . O O D 

### Fs

- BIanM 

### D O I Residue 9. O d:> O • 7



### RUN #3 Volume of Liquit 

### i S

Colof Final Weigir 

### 91

- - 1 ?0 Tare Weighi 

### ?$• 197# - Residue b Blanl 

### O.O D O(lo

- BIanM 0- o O a 1 Residue 

### O . o O0 ~ RUN #2 Voiume of Liqub

CClol Final Weigh Taro WeigM Residue & Blanl

- BIanM O • ~ '`" 3 Residue

RUN #3 Volume of Liqui,

Coloi Fnal Weigh Tare WeigN Residue 3c Blani

- BIanM 0. 5 - A-7 Residue 7-6 C) ( tG r ' i0G • 67 7 ) 

### /o `•G7(

.eL co.d>oI! O.

~ OOL o.Doo 7 p,el

Z ft'21 /

C~ ,•DOOZ



### ~C~~

### PRETEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201 A TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC#3 Baghouse DATE: 1215/94 RUN #: #1 Compliance

Pbar Pg Ts Tm B(ws) A!-I@ Meter in Hg in H20 °F °F fraction in H20 25.32 -9 52 85 0.02 1.849

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient Cp(2) Cp(201 A) % % % °F dimensionless dimensionless 0.2 20.5 79.3 48 0.8414 0.8414


### total run time # of points aPavg oP1 Y stacfc area min in H20 in H20 meter coef ft2 60 12 0.36 0.35 1.085 1.9174



### Md Mw Ps μa Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 28.852 28.63496 24.6582 175.1882

as eH oH(-50) nH(+50) ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 0.4521 0.5661 0.6953 0.4699

Pretest Pitots Finish 453.972 + ok Start 453.968 - ok 0.004 Vacuum 19.5 Posttest Pitots Finish 476.138 + ok Start 476.135 - ok 0.003 Vacuum 18.9



# ~5~

### nozzie Dn APmn pPmx #

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0230 2 0.4331 0.0036 0.0325 3 0.3937 0.0053 0.0477 4 0.3543 0.0081 0.0727 5 0.3150 0.0129 0.1163 6 0.2756 0.0220 0.1798 7 0.2362 0.0409 0.2979 8 0.2165 0.0795 0.4022 9 0.1969 0.1428 0.5635 10 0.1772 0.2495 0.8281 11 0.15 0.5492 1.5483 12 0.135 0.8765 2.3184 13 

### 'Error' 'Error' 14 

### 'Error' 'Error' 15 

### 'Error' 'Error'

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx 

### in fvsec fvsec ft/sec fvsec
1 0.47 6.19 

### 'Error' 3.10 12.66 2 0.43 7.37 

### 'Error' 3.68 13.96 3 0.39 8.91 

### 'Error' 4.46 15.67 4 0.35 11.01 

### 'Error' 5.50 17.97 5 0.32 13.92 

### `Error' 6.96 21.20 6 0.28 18.19 

### 'Error` 9.09 25.97 7 0.24 24.76 12.07 12.38 33.43 8 0.22 29.47 17.26 14.74 38.84 9 0.20 35.63 23.15 17.82 45.97 10 0.18 44.00- 30.59 22.00 55.73 11 0.15 61.40 45.39 30.70 76.21 12 0.14 75.80 57.34 37.90 93.25 13 0.00 

### `Error• 'Error` `Error` `Error• 14 0.00 

### 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 15 0.00 

### 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error•.



# /J?rVmxc OPmn OPmnc

ft/sec in H20 in H20

choose largest 9.29 'Error' 0.0026 11.05 'En•or' 0.0036 13.37 'Error' 0.0053 16.51 'Error' 0.0081 20.88 'Error' 0.0129 27.28 'Error' 0.0220 37.14 0.04 0.0409 44.21 0.08 0.0579 53.45 0.14 0.0846 66.00 0.25 0.1290 92.10 0.55 0.25 113.70 0.88 0.38 

### 'Error' 'Error' 

### 'Error' 'Error` 'Enror' 

### 'Error` 'Error' 'Error' 

### 'Error` oPmx OPmxc in H20 in H20 choose smallest 0.04 0.0230 0.05 0.03 0.07 0.05 0.09 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.20 0.30 0.37. 0.40 0.52 0.56 0.76 0.83 1.16 

### 1.55 2.26 2.32 3.45 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' `Error' 

### 'Error' 

### An ft2

1.2172E-3 1.0231 E-3 8.4539E-4 6.8465E-4 5.4119E-4 4.1427E-4 3.0429E-4 2.5565E-4 2.1146E-4 1.7126E-4 1.2272E-4 9.9402E-5

~



## ~~TEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201 A TEST SiTE: Interstate Brick DC#3 Baghouse Date: 12/5194 RUN #: #1 Compliance Start 1200 Stop 1315 point # AP(201 A) dwell act time Ts Tmo

in H20 min decimal °F °F

1 0.35 4.93 500 53 57 2 0.55 6.18 615 56 57 3 0.53 6.07 600 56 58 4 0.13 3.00 300 58 59 5 0.11 2.76 245 57 59 6 0.1 2.64 245 57 60 7 0.95 8.12 800 62 62 8 0.66 6.77 645 63 62 9 0.68 6.87 645 63 63 10 0.11 2.76 245 64 63 11 0.09 2.50 230 64 63 12 0.08 2.36 215 65 64

total 55.0 avg 0.36 5285.00 59.83 60.58 Actual Time: 54.75 Average Meter Temp: 59.54



# IL37Tmi Tov Vm vacuum AH SqRt aP °F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 '454.052 58 245 4.1 0.5661 0.5916 58 253 4.1 0.5661 0.7416 59 254 4.1 0.5661 0.7280 59 242 4.1 0.5661 0.3606 60 238 4.1 0.5661 0.3317 60 241

. 464.139 4.1 0.5661 0.3162 58 248 4.1 0.5661 0.9747 57 256 4.1 0.5661 0.8124 58 255 4.1 0.5661 0.8246 58 252 4.1 0.5661 0.3317 58 257 4.1 0.5661 0.3000 59 254 476.06 4.1 0.5661 0.2828

22.008 58.50 249.58 4.10 0.5661 0.5497

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 8.9 0.42 0.02 25.32 -9.00

Ps μs Vmds Gs Mw DSO in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min μm 24.66 177.22 20.53 0.46 28.6350 10.0326

Average Dn An V9 Iso as in ft2 fVsec % 0.1830 1.8265E-4 33.92 123.18 1.9210E+5 

### Tota! AAg Cs Ca Emr mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 5.2 5.5844E-7 0.0039 0.11



# ~~~

# American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 5b5 South Birch Drive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

LIBORATORY DATJ1 

### EPA Method 201A



# _ f 

# z Company:

~ 

### —,a ~.~ ~ ~ 

### Run Number: 

## Sampiing Location: Date:

Initial YVeight Impinger 1 ' ~~ 

### "? Impinger 2 

## G a 7. .1 Impinger 3 

## y37. 7 Impinger 4 

## . Z.3 7 / Moisture Collecied 

### Final Weight 

# say a

~a~ a

~ 

# ys a Weight Gain



# J. a
A / 

## O :S 6./ 

## Tota I Ga in Particulate Caitected


### -_10 Particubt+e 

## Larger Than Plrl -10 Particvlaie 1. Fiiter Final YVeight: 

## O/y 7& — 

## Acetone Wash Mg 2. Fiiter Tare 1Neight: 

## O. / 9S7


## , 1 3. Net Filter Weight: 

## D. Dy / S.'

~ 

### • Y``7 

### 4. Acetone Wash Mg: ~ 

### • /

~ 

### - ~ 

### S. Total PM-10 Mg:

I-

~ .--L=-- i ~ ~ ~'► 

## Total P164-10 PartiwEate Catclf Ata 

## Particulate Caught In impingers Mg. /. 3 r ? 

# S ^ .z---)

/J71 

# ~PRETEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201A TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC #3 Baghouse RUN #: #2 Compliance

Pbar Pg Ts Tm in Hg in H20 °F °F 25.3 -9 59 80

CO2 02 

### N2 +CO Tambient % % 9'e °F 0.2 20.5 79.3 50

total run time # of points oPavg aP1 min in H20 in H20 60 12 0.36 0.35 DATE: 1215194

B(ws) dH@ Meter fraction in H20 0.02 1.849 Cp(2)

. Cp(201 A) dimensionless dimensionless 0.8414 0.8414

Y stack area meter coef ft2 1.085 1.9174



### Md Mw Ps }is Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib moie in Hg micropoise 28.852 28.63496 24.6382 176.9997



### as AH AH(-50) AH(+50) ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 0.4587 0.5615 0.6876 0.4672

Pretest Pitots Finish 476.349 + ok Start 476.344 - ok 0.005 Vacuum 20 Posttest Pitots Finish 499.1 + ok Start 499.098 - ok 

### 0.002 Vacuum 19.2



# 41nozzte Dn oPmn oPmx #

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0233 2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0330 3 0.3937 0.0054 0.0484 4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0737 5 0.3150 0.0131 0.1180 6 0.2756 0.0224 0.1822 7 0.2362 0.0415 0.3021 8 0.2165 0.0810 0.4079 9 0.1969 0.1453 0.5715 10 0.1772 0.2536 0.8399 11 0.15 0.5577 1.5707 12 0.135. 0.8899 2.3522 13 'Error' •Error 14 'Error' 'Error 15 •Error •Error

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx in ivsec ft/sec ft/sec fvsec

1 0.47 6.28 'Error' 3.14 12.83 2 0.43 7.47 •Error' 3.74 14.15 3 0.39 9.04 'Error 4.52 15.88 4 0.35 11.17 'Error 5.58 18.21 5 0.32 14.13 'Error 7.06 21.49 6 0.28 18.45 •Error' 9.23 26.33 7 0.24 25.12 12.30 12.56 33.90 8 0.22 - 29.91 17.55 14.95 39.40 9 0.20 36.16 23.51 18.08 46.63 10 0.18 44.64 31.06 22.32 56.54 11 0.15 62.30 46.07 31.15 77.31 12 0.14 76.91 58.19 38.46 94.61 13 0.00 'Error' 'Error 'Error' 'Error' 14 0.00 'Error• •Error• 'Error• 'En•or• 15 0.00 'En•or' •Error 'Error• 'En•or'



# AV

### Vmxc oPmn oPmnc OPmx APmxc An

ft/sec in H20 in H20 in H20 in H20 ft2



### choose largest choose smallest 9.42 'Error' 0.0026 0.04 0.0233 1.2172E-3 11.21 'Error' 0.0037 0.05 0.03 1.0231 E-3 13.57 'Error' 0.0054 0.07 0.05 8.4539E-4 16.75 'Error' 0.0082 0.09 0.07 6.8465E-4 21.19 `Error` 0.0131 0.12 0.12 5.4119E-4 27.68 *Error' 0.0224 0.18 0.20 4.1427E-4 37.69 0.04 0.0415 0.30 0.37 3.0429E-4 44.86 0.08 0.0588 0.41 0.53 2.5565E-4 54.23 0.15 0.0859 0.57 0.77 2.1146E-4 66.96 0.25 0.1309 0.84 1.18 1.7126E-4 93.45 0.56 0.25 1.57 2.29 1.2272E-4 115.37 0.89 0.39 2.35 3.50 9.9402E-5 *Error• 'Error' *Error• 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 'Error•



# I

~ 

# a-

## TEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201 A TEST SITE: Interstate Bricic DC #3 Baghouse Date: 12/5J94 RllN #: #2 Compliance Start 1410 Stop 1525 point # oP(201 A) dwell act time Ts Tmo

in H20 min decimal °F °F

1 0.35 4.93 5 56 65 2 0.56 6.24 6.25 57 65 3 0.53 6.07 6 58 66 4 0.16 3.33 3.25 59 65 5 0.13 3.00 3 57 66 6 0.11 2.76 2.75 56 66 7 0.92 7.99 8 55 66 8 0.62 6.56 6.5 56 66 9 0.7 6.97 7 54 66 10 0.11 2.76 2.75 52 67 11 0.11 2.76 2.75 52 66 12 0.1 2.64 2.75 53 66

totai 56.0 avg 0.37 56.00 55.42 65.83 Actual Time: 56.00 Average Meter Temp: 65.92



## //4 

## ~ 3Tmi Tov Vm vacuum OH SqRt OP

°F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 476.432 65 232 4.2 0.5615 0.5916 66 251 4.2 0.5615 0.7483 66 245 4.2 0.5615 0.7280 65 250 4.2 0.5615 0.4000 67 253 4.2 0.5615 0.3606 67 249 487.188 4.2 0.5615 0.3317 66 245 4.1 0.5615 0.9592 66 253 4.1 0.5615 0.7874 66 260 4.1 0.5615 0.8367 66 261 4.1 0.5615 0.3317 66 258 4.1 0.5615 0.3317 66 255 499.018 4.1 0.5615 0.3162

22.586 66.00 251.00 4.15 0.5615 0.5602

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 6.5 0.31 0.01 25.3 -9.00

Ps μs Vmds Os Mw D50 in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min μm 24.64 176.48 20.80 0.45 28.6947 10.1464

Average Dn An Vs Iso Qa. in ft2 ft/sec % 0.1830 1.8265E-4 34.41 118.69 1.9745E+5
Total Mg Cs Cs Emr mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 3.5 3.7104E-7 0.0026 0.07



# I (o 

# ~

# American Environrnentai Tes'

~ 

# ing Company, Inc. 565 So uth Birch D rive Spanish ForK Utah 84600 (801) 2t;6-7111



## LABORATaRY DATA 

## EPA Method 5 Company: Run Number: Oo? 

## Sampiing Location: --m4a-e, 

## Date: ~S~s% Moisture Coilec;ed 

## Inittai Weight Fina1 Weight Weight Gain Impinger 1 

## Sa`/. a

~. 

## D• G Impinger 2

~~ 

### 9. / 

## C3e- 1 3' 

# I.7 Impinger 3 4 139. O 

## Impinger 4 75CS / 7y ei . 

## Total Ga1n
Particuiate Coflected 

## Front - Halt Analysis (Nozzie, Probe, Fitier and Oven Grassvrare) 1. Filter FinallNeight 2. Filter Tare YYeight 

## 3. Total Filter Weight 4. Partkviate caught In nozzle, prabe and gfassware S. Total Front - Haft Catch 

# 0. /y99 o • /ggs 

## a.000y = o.4-&-n

~ 

### . 3 ,.. ~ 

## Back - Halt Analysis (Impingera, and Connecting Gfassware) 1. Partkutate caught in impingera evaporated down at teis than 12d' F. 

## Totai Particufate Catch (Sum of Front and Back - Halt Catches)

- 

## 3 . 5 - .n

141-1 

## ~

### PRETEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201 A TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC #3 Baghouse RUN #: #3 Compliance

Pbar Pg Ts Tm in Hg in H20 °F °F 25.26 -9 52 70

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient % % % °F 0.2 20.5 79.3 40

total run time # of points oPavg oP1 min in H20 in H20 60 12 - 0.36 0.35 DATE: 12094

B(ws) AH@ Meter fraction in H20 0.02 1.849 Cp(2) Cp(201 A) dimensionless dimensionless 0.8414 0.8414


### Yi stadc area meter coef ft2 1.085 1.9174

Md Mw Ps μs Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 28.852 28.63496 24.5982 175.1882

as I&H AH(-50) oH(+50) ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 0.4524 0.5500 0.6754 0.4565

Pretest Pitots Finish 499.309 + ok Start 499.305 - ok 0.004 

### Vacuum 20.2 Posttest Pitots Finish 521.686 + ok Start 521.684

- ok 0.002 

### Vacuum 18



# I~~nozzle Dn APmn APmx

#

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0230 2 0.4331 0.0036 0.0325 3 0.3937 0.0053 0.0476 4 0.3543 0.0081 0.0726 5 0.3150 0.0129 0.1162 6 0.2756 0.0220 0.1795 7 0.2362 0.0408 0.2976 8 0.2165 0.0794 0.4018 9 0.1969 0.1428 0.5629 10 0.1772 0.2494 0.8272 11 0.15 0.5487 1.5466 12 0.135 0.8757 2.3160 13 'Error' •Error• 

### 14 'Error' 'Error' 15 'Error• •Error'

Dn Vn Vmn Vmna Vmx in ft/sec fUsec fUsec fUsec

1 0.47 6.20 •Error` 3.10 12.67 2 0.43 7.37 'Error' 3.69 13.97 3 0.39 8.92 'Error' 4.46 15.67 4 0.35 11.01 'Error' 5.51 17.98 5 0.32 13.93 'En•or' 6.97 21.21 6 0.28 18.20 'Error' 9.10 25.98 7 0.24 24.78 12.09 12.39 33.45 8 0.22 29.50 17.28 14.75 38.87 9 0.20 35.66 23.17 17.83 46.00 10 0.18 44.03 30.62 22.01 55.77 11 0.15 61.44 45.42 30.72 76.26 12

. 0.14 75.86 57.38 37.93 93.32 13 0.00 'Error` 'Error' `Error' 'Error' 14 0.00 •Error' •Error' •Error• •Error' 15 0.00 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 'Error•



# A~ O 7Vmxc aPmn oPmnc OPmx oPmxc An

ft/sec in H20 in H20 in H20 in H20 ft2

choose largest choose smallesi 9.29 'Error' 0.0026 0.04 0.0230 1.2172E-3 11.06 'Error` 0.0036 0.05 0.03 1.0231 E-3 13.38 'Error' 0.0053 0.07 0.05 8.4539E-4 16.52 'Error' 0.0081 0.09 0.07 6.8465E-4 20.90 'Error' 0.0129 0.12 0.12 5.4119E-4 27.30 'Error• 0.0220 0.18 0.20 4.1427E-4 37.17 0.04 0.0408 0.30 0.37 3.0429E-4 44.24 0.08 0.0578 0.40 0.52 2.5565E-4 53.49 0.14 0.0845 0.56 0.76 2.1146E-4 66.04 0.25 0.1289 0.83 1.16 1.7126E-4 92.17 0.55 0.25 1:55 2.26 1.2272E-4 113.79 0.88 0.38 2.32 3.44 9.9402E-5 'Error' `Error' 'Error• 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 'Error• 'Error` 'Error' •Error' *Error• 'Error' 'Error' *Error•



# I ~~

### TEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201 A TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC #3 Baghouse Date: 12/6/94 RUN #: #3 Compliance 

### Start 910 

### Stop 1028 point # oP(201A) dwell act time Ts Tmo

in H20 min decimal °F °F

1 0.35 4.93 5 42 58 2 0.57 6.29 6.25 45 59 3 0.54 6.12 6 49 59 4 0.2 3.73 3.75 52 60 5 0.13 3.00 3 53 61 6 0.12 2.89 3 54 61 7 0.95 8.12 8 51 63 8 0.68 6.87 6.75 50 63 9 0.15 3.23 3.25 52 64 10 0.1 2.64 2.75 52 64 11 0.11 2.76 2.75 51 64 12 0.13 3.00 3 52 65



### total 53.6 avg 0.34 53.50 50.25 61.75 Actual T'ime: 53.50 Average Meter Temp: 62.04



# /6



# ~ ,Tmi Tov Vm vacuum OH SqRt oP

°F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 499.386 57 245 3.8 0.5505 0.5916 59 256 3.8 0.5505 0.7550 60 244 3.8 0.5505 0.7348 61 245 4 0.5505 0.4472 62 244 4 0.5505 0.3606 62 248 510.243 3.9 0.5505 0.3464 63 253 3.8 0.5505 0.9747 64 249 3.8 0.5505 0.8246 64 251 3.8 0.5505 0.3873 65 249 3.9 0.5505 0.3162 65 252 3.8 0.5505 0.3317 66 254 521.555 3.8 0.5505 0.3606

22.169 62.33 249.17 3.85 0.5505 0.5359

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 6.5 0.31 0.01 25.26 -9.00

Ps μs Vmds as Mw D50 in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min μm 24.60 175.13 20.53 0.46 28.6927 9.8995

Average Dn An Vs Iso as in ft2 fvsec % 0.1830 1.8265E-4 32.78 127.71 1.8964E+5 

### Total Mg Cs Cs Emr mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 2.7 2.8993E-7 0.0020 0.05

1 I 

## ~.



# American Environinental Tes:ing Cornpany, Inc_

565 So uth 8irch D rive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 2E6-7111


## LA84Ft1TaHY DATA 

## EPA Methcd 5 Company: .. t,_ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ 

# ~ Run Number: -Or 5! 

## Sampiing Location: L-2:
~ . :~ ~~~•/~~~ 

## b, Date: Z- - iy Moisture Collected 

## Initial lilteight Final Weight Vlteight Gain lmpinger 1 So'?r) ,o I O. 1 

## lmpinger 2 63Q 9• 'V' Impinger 3 3~ • 

### Impinger 4 

## Total Gain =
Particuiate Ccllec!ed 

## Ftont - Hait Anatysis (Nozzle, ProL^e, Fiiter and Oven Gtassware) -O. i



# ,6 . .5 - ..,Z

1. Fitter Final Weight 2. Fifter Tare Weight 

## 3. Total Fiiter Weight 4. Parifculate caught In 

## nozzle, probe and glassware 5. Tota1 Frcnt - Half Catch 4~ 

# 6 3

i • z 

## Back - Half Analysis (Impingers, and Connecttng Gfiassware) I. Partkulate caught In impingers eraporated down at less than 120' F. 

### i • Y' 

## Totai Partkulate Catch (Sum of Front and Back - Half Catcfies)

a•~ w,



# /-71

# American Environmental Testing Cornpany, Inc_ SSS South Birch Drive 

## Spanish ForK Utah 84650 (801) 256-7111

,y



### . . _ ._ -

Source: Run Number:



## ORSAT ANALYSIS 

## (Average of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon Dixoide Carbon

Monoxide



# 2 ~2 < 0 -~

Average 

# 79'-3

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111



### Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

POST TEST AC>=TONE EVAPORATION

COMPANY: 75

~ •%-s76?-,k— ~r'~ C~ ~ 

### SOURCE: TSC;r#? CONTAINER #2 DATE: 

### tn , / 

### PARTICLES GREATER THAN PM-10
ACETONE BLANK Voiume of Liquic Final Weight CONTAINER #3 Tare Weight j/0 G-Tr° (l PARTICLES PM-10 

### Residue G•` ~ Z 

### OR SMALLER

RUN #1 Volume of Liquic

Color Final Weight Tare Weight Residue & Blank

- Blank Residue

RUN #2 Voiume of Liquic ' Color Final Weight Tare Weight Residue & Blank



### - Blank Residue

RUN #3 Volume of Liquic

Color Final Weight Tare Weight Residue & Blank

- Blank Residue RUN #1 Voiume of LIquic

Calor Final Weight /0 ?. 9/ 3 S ~ Tare Weight / o 7// L Residue & Blank O- p 0 2 -3

- Blank 

### d - O D o Z Residue 

### b O° L- /

RUN #2 Volume of Liquic -:2.

Color c Final Weight 7 ~ p- 2- / .2- Tare Weight `l rr • 2 1 O "t Residue & BIanM o. o o 2, /

- Blank 0


### - 0 o 0

Z Residue 

### 0- o v! ^ 7
RUN #3 Voiume ot Liquic Z°

~ " l s

Color c!r

~ Finai Weight 

### /o G• 7 Y S/ Tare Weight 

### 7

~



### f 3k Residue & Blank 

### o• o (D 1 3

- Blank 

### b • v °o Z Residue 

### o 0 

### <



# /~~

### AMERICAN ENViRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-71 1 1

Spanisn Fork, Utah 84660

POST TEST BACK HALF EVAPORATION

COMPANY: 1~ ? 4

- -3 f` * - Zr- C' ~ G 

### SOURCE: t7C #t3 DATE: ~_~

CONTAINER sl 

## METHYLENE CHLORIDE

BLANK Volume of Liquid 3 c 0 ^^ ( s Flnal Weight (a 5 '3 3 Tare Weight / 0 1 • frS3 Z 

## Residue t CONTAINER =2 

### DISTILLED WATER

BLANK Volume of Liquid 3 O° • ~- ~ s Final Weight

y2. ? 7 G G 

### Tare Weight



### 77 G ~ Residue ro • o o Z

RUN s 1 

### RUN s 1 Volume of Liquid 2- o O A-.. l S Volume of Liquid

Color 

### c-(Gc,— Color 

### C./c . Final Weight / 9 2 Final Weight 1 O2. ?3 /
~ Tare Weight 9f1. 11 Z L Tare Weight /a L• ft3 O f 

### Resldue & Blank v•°° D G 

### Residue & Blank b- o y 1 v

- Blank 

### 0. o a o Blank 

### O.pOOZ Residue ~• ~ S 

## D-

~ 

## '^' > Residue 8 p-Ir 

## ..._ ~


### RUN s2 Volume of Liquid 

### 2DO

~ 

### •..ls RUN =2 Volume of Liquid

Color 

### G (c e-- Finai Wetght ? yAL Final Tare Weight

Y S• (?5 7- 8• Tare Residue & Blank



### °- 0 o O Residue - Blank cD • o 0 0 , Restdue D • 0 0 10 

### Color C&G — 

### Weight 

### F'

r23 7 Weight a<Blank 

### o.oDO I - Blank O •000 Z 

### Restdue 

### a - O o0 7 ,7

RUN s3 Volume of Liquid z oo 

### ••., ls

Color 

### ctc C.- Final Welght

9 f. 7¢S

~~ fTare Weight



### 99• 7 4±

~



### f Residue & Blank 

### o. o o/ O - Blank [,> • o 0 o i - Blank (9• 00 0 2 Residue y_ a o D

- 7 0 Residue m - o 0 0 8 

## p. £r j RUN =3 Volume of Liquid 

### >o o— Ls

Color Gt 4- a-- Final Weight 101. 9 6 1 7 Z 

### Tare Weight 

### lOZ. p! 6 , d 7 Resldue & Blank 

### n• 0 o o8 ,



# i?4

### PRETEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201A TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC#4 Baghouse RUN #: #1 Compliance


### Pbar Pg Ts Tm in Hg in H20 °F °F 25.31 -0.03 50 90

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient % % % °F 0.1 20.8 79.1 40
total run time # of points ePavg ePi min in H20 in H20 60 12 0.22 0.09 DATE: 12/5194

B(ws) dH@ iUeter 

### fraction in H20 0.02 1.748 Cp(2) Cp(201 A) dimensionless dimensioniess 0.8394 0.8394


### Y stadc area meter coef ft2 0.998 1.9174

Md Mw Ps μs Ib/Ib mole Ib ✓ Ib mole in Hg micropoise 28.848 28.631 25.308 174.831

as OH AH(-50) AH(+50) ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 0.4472 0.561 0.690 0.466

Pretest Pitots Finish 589.036 + ok Start 589.034 - ok 0.002 Vacuum 18.6 Posttest Pitots Finish 617.429 + ok Start 617.426 - ok 0.003 

### Vacuum 19



# l ~~5"TEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201 A TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC#4 Baghouse Date: 12/5/94 RUN #: #1 Compliance START: 920 STOP: 1016 point # AP(201 A) dweil act time Ts Tmo

in H20 min decimal °F °F

1 0.09 3.20 315 50 64 2 0.2 4.77 445 46 64 3 0.22 5.00 500 44 65 4 0.21 4.89 500 42 67 5 0.23 5.11 500 42 69 6 0.25 5.33 515 42 71 7 0.27 5.54 530 42 74 8 0.26 5.44 530 42 76 9 0.24 5.22 515 43 79 10 0.25 5.33 515 43 81 11 0.22 5.00 500 43 83 12 0.21 4.89 500 43 84

total 59.7 avg 0.22 5865.00 43.50 73.08 Actual Time: 59.75 Average Meter Temp: 79.54



## ) 71o5)Tmi Tov Vm vacuum oH SqRt ,&P

°F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 589.108 64 265 590.665 1.2 0.56 0.0000 66 265 592.906 1.1 0.56 0.0000 73 266 595.271 1.2 0.56 0.0000 79 265 597.655 1.2 0.56 0.0000 84 266 600.013 1.2 0.56 0.0000 88 266 602.518 1.2 0.56 0.5000 91 265 605.152 1.2 0.56 0.5196 93 264 607.792 1.2 0.56 0.5099 96 264 610.304 1.2 0.56 0.4899 98 265 612.565 1.2 0.56 0.5000 99 267 614.946 12 0.56 0.4690 101 265 617.355 1.2 0.56 0.4583
28.25 86.00 265.25 1.19 0.5600 0.2872

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 30.5 1.44 0.06 25.31 -0.03

Ps μs Vmds 

### as Mw D50 in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min Am 25.31 170.34 23.33 0.47 28.2191 9.5171

Average Dn An Vs iso 

### as in ft2 ft/sec % 0.216 2.5447E-4 17.31 177.17 9.9819E+4
Total Mg Cs Cs Emr mg . Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 9.0 8.5055E-7 0.0060 0.08



# II?

# American Environmental Testing Company, lnc.

` 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Forlc, Utah 84660 (801) 266-7111

LAB O RATO RY D

~ 

### 1TA 

## EPA Method 201A 

# . . .. _ . Company: Run Number: 

## Sampling Location: Lank°Ase p C- 04 

## Date• 1 Z-S- 9y



## impinger 1 Impinger 2 Impinger 3 impinger 4 Inftial Weight

s36• y 

# y Z (

~ 

# '. Z
C 8

~ 

## 1.6 

## .. ~ 

## • = 

## • = --=' ~ 

## Finai Welght 

# SBs. (0 

# 5 1 0• 6 L13Z-3 6 85.1 

## Weight Galn



# _+ , o

. -J- 13 . Z



# 4-0 5 - Totai G4 =

- +'30 , S Particulate Colfected
Pfrl - 10 Partit 

## uiats Larger lhan PU -14 ParticuEal 1. Fitter Finai Weight: _ o , Z

~ 3 9 

## Acetone Wash Mg 2. Fifter Tane Weight: _ 3. Net Fitter Weight: _ 

## 0.0051 

## 4. Acetone Wash Mg:: S. Total PM-10 Mg: _ 

# ~ 7, z. ~


## Badk Hat! Ma" ~ 

## - Paarticulate Caught In" Impingers Mg.

. S

~ 

### .. ~ 

### .., 

# . '

~ ~ -- ~ 

# . _ 1 

# .

..
- - 

# 5- a " 5



# / 79'PRETEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201A TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC#4 Baghouse RUN #: #2 Compliance

Pbar Pg Ts Tm in Hg in H20 °F °F 25.31 -0.03 50 90

CO2 % 0.1

total run time min 60 02

% 20.8
# of points

12 N2 +CO

% 79.1
APavg in H20 0.22 Tambient

°F 40

aP1 in H20 0.09 DATE: 1215/94

B(ws) 

### al-i@ Meter fraction in H20 0.02 1.748 Cp(2) Cp(201 A) dimensionless dimensionless 0.8394 0.8394

Y stadc area meter coef ft2 0.998 1.9174

Md Mw Ps Na Ib/lb mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 28.848 28.631 25.308 174.831

Os AH AH(-50) OH(+50) ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 0.4472 0.561 0.690 0.466

Pretest Pitots Finish 617.664 + ok S tart 617.662 - ok 0.002 Vacuum 18 Posttest Pitots Finish 644.632 + ok Start 644.63 - ok 0.002 Vacuum 19

iiq

### nozzle Dn APmn OPmx #

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0233 2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0330 3 0.3937 0.0054 0.0483 4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0736 5 0.3150 0.0131 0.1178 6 0.2756 0.0223 0.1825 7 0.2362 0.0414 0.3024 8 0.2165 0.0798 0.4080 9 0.1969 0.1440 0.5715 10 0.1772 0.2520 0.8396 11 0.15 0.5555 1.5692 12 0.135 0.8869 2.3495 

### 13 'Error' 'Error• 14 'Error• 'Error` 

### 15 'Error• 'Error`

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx in ft/sec fflsec fvsec fvsec

1 0.47 6.12 'Error' 3.06 12.56 2 0.43 7.29 'Error' 3.64 13.85 3 0.39 8.82 'Error' 4.41 15.53 4 0.35 10.89 'Error' S.44 17.81 5 0.32 13.77 'Error' 6.89 21.00 6 0.28 17.99 •Error' 9.00 25.72 7 0.24 24.50 11.83 12.25 33.10 8 0.22 29.16 17.01 14.58 38.45 9 0.20 35.25 22.84 17.63 46.51 10 0.18 43.52 30.22 21.76 55.16 11 0.15 60.74 44.86 30.37 75.41 12 0.14 74.99 56.69 37.49 92.27 13 0.00 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 14 0.00 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 'Error• 15 0.00 'En•or` 'Error' `Error' 'Error'



## r~Vmxc OPmn OPmnc aPmx OPmxc An

ft/sec in H20 in H20 in H20 in H20 ft2 choose largest choose smallest 9.19 'Error' 0.0026 0.04 0.0233 1.2172E-3 10.93 'Error' 0.0037 0.05 0.03 1.0231 E-3 13.23 'En•or' 0.0054 0.07 0.05 8.4539E-4 16.33 'Error' 0.0082 0.09 0.07 6.8465E-4 20.66 'Error' 0.0131 0.12 0.12 5.4119E-4 26.99 'Error' 0.0223 0.18 0.20 4.1427E-4 36.74 0.04 0.0414 0.30 0.37 3.0429E-4 43.73 0.08 0.0587 0.41 0.53 2.5565E-4 52.88 0.14 0.0857 0.57 0.77 2.1146E-4 65.29 0.25 0.1307 0.84 1.18 1.7126E-4 91.11 0.56 0.25 1.57 2.29 1.2272E-4 112.48 0.89 0.39 2.35 3.49 9.9402E-5 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 'Error' 'En•or' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error'

` 

# ~ ITEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201A TEST S1TE: Interstate Brick DC#4 Baghouse Date: 12/5/94 RUN #: #2 Compliance START: 1115 STOP: 1219
point # AP(201 A) dwell act time Ts Tmo

in H20 min dec9mal °F °F

1 0.09 3.20 315 43 79 2 0.21 4.89 500 42 78 3 0.19 4.65 445 42 78 4 0.24 5.22 515 45 78 5 0.22 5.00 500 44 80 6 0.2 4.77 445 43 81 7 0.21 4.89 500 42 84 8 0.19 4.65 445 42 84 9 022 5.00 500 42 85 10 0.2 4.77 445 42 85 11 0.19 4.65 445 42 88 12 0.21 4.89 500 41 89

total 56.5 avg 0.20 5555.00 42.50 82.42 Actual Time: 57.25 Average Meter Temp: 87.67



# (0-Tmi Tov Vm vacuum oH SqRt oP



### °F °F fq in Hg in H20 617.728 79 265 619.342 1.1 0.56 0.0000 80 268 621.716 1.1 0.56 0.0000 85 268 623.978 1.2 0.56 0.0000 90 268 626.462 1.2 0.56 0.0000 93 244 628.843 1.2 0.56 0.0000 96 242 630.791 1.2 0.56 0.4472 92 246 633.172 1.2 0.56 0.4583 95 247 635.461 1.2 0.56 0.4359 98 247 637.863 1.2 0.56 0.4690 101 247 639.868 1.2 0.56 0.4472 102 246 642.121 1.2 0.56 0.4359 104 247 644.54 1.2 0.56 0.4583
26.81 92.92 252.92 1.18 0.5600 0.2626

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 15.8 0.74 0.03 25.31 -0.03

Ps μs Vmds Os Mw D50 in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min μm 25.31 171.93 21.81 0.44 28.4904 9.9198

Average Dn An Vs iso Gs . in f1:2 fvsec % 0.216 2.5447E-4 15.73 184.91 9.3346E+4
Total Mg Cs Cs Emr mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 4.1 4.1436E-7 0.0029 0.04



## 1~ 

# 3

# American Environmental Testing Company, lnc.

' • 565 South Birch Drive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84550 (801) 266-7111

LAB O RATO RY D/1T/l 

## EPA Method 201A 

## Company: k r, cfc ,, r.w . T. ( ATrO 

### y 

## Run Number: -;# 2

~ 

## ",

~ 

## ,, 

## Sampling Location: f- 4,g 4 .v°v"e D c - o y 

## Date: J 2 - s — - 5 c

UM 

## - r 7 i 9 1 _ •- : •



## . initial Weight Finai Weight Weight Gain impinger 1 S26. S 

## Impi nger '2 Sy a• o S 3 8 ~ 

### s" 

## impinger 3 Li 3 O 

## Impinger4 7rz.!

-~ 

### - S• Z 

## Tota1 Gain LD Particutate Co(fected

L• cI L-st-l- - 

## 1. Fitter Final Weight: • 0 

# . 14 q 7 2. Fitter Tare Weight: o• 19 83 

## =z" 3. Net Fitter Weight: O1 8 D I'1

~ 

## I''k —) 4. Acetone Wash Mg: 4 1 9WsEt 2 

## S. Totai PM-10 Mg: ~~• 

## s"-y 

## Larger Than P!i

- 

## 10 ParUcuiale 

## Acetorw Wash Mg

r~..~



### Bacic Hatt Anaws 

# . _ - Particuiate Caught In Impirxgers Mg. 

# 4'.I ^ 1

/~ 

# `i"PRETEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201 A TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC#4 Baghouse DATE: 12/5/94 RUN #: #3 Compliance

Pbar Pg Ts Tm B(ws) AH@ Meter in Hg in H20 °F °F fraction in H20 25.31 -0.03 50 90 0.02 1.748

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient Cp(2) Cp(201 A) % % % °F dimensionless dimensionless 0.1 20.8 79.1 40 0.8394 0.8394

total run time # of points APavg aP1 Y stadc area min in H20 in H20 meter coef ft2 60 12 - 0.22 0.09 0.998 1.9174

Md Mw ps 9 3 Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 28.848 28.631 25.308 174.831



### as eH OH(-50) OH(+50) ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 0.4472 0.561 0.690 0.466

Pretest Pitots Finish 645.316 + ok Start 645.314 - ok 0.002 Vacuum 18 Posttest Pitots Finish 672.866 + ok Start 672.863 - ok 0.003 Vacuum 20



# id

### nozzle Dn OPmn APmx

#

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0233 2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0330 3 0.3937 0.0054 0.0483 4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0736 5 0.3150 0.0131 0.1178 6 0.2756 0.0223 0.1825 7 0.2362 0.0414 0.3024 8 0.2165 0.0798 0.4080 9 0.1969 0.1440 0.5715 10 0.1772 0.2520 0.8396 11 0.15 0.5555 1.5692 12 0.135 0.8869 2.3495 13 •Error' 'En•or' 14 `En•or' •Error' 15 'Error• 'En•or'

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx in ft/sec ft/sec ft/sec fvsec

1 0.47 6.12 'Error' 3.06 12.56 2 0.43 7.29 'Error' 3.64 13.85 3 0.39 8.82 'En•or' 4.41 15.53 4 0.35 10.89 'Error' 5.44 17.81 5 0.32 13.77 'En•or' 6.89 21.00 6 0.28 17.99 'En•or' 9.00 25.72 7 0.24 24.50 11.83 12.25 33.10 8 0.22 29.16 17.01 14.58 38.45 9 0.20 35.25 22.84 17.63 45.51 10 0.18 43.52 30.22 21.76 55.16 11 0.15 60.74 44.86 30.37 75.41 12 0.14 74.99 56.69 37.49 92.27 13 0.00 'En•ar' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 14 0.00 'Error• 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 15 0.00 'Error• 'En•or' 'Error' 'Error'



# ~Vmxc APmn APmnc

ft/sec in H20 in H20



### choose largest 9.19 'Error' 0.0026 10.93 'Error' 0.0037 13.23 'Error' 0.0054 16.33 'Error' 0.0082 20.66 'Error' 0.0131 26.99 'Error' 0.0223 36.74 0.04 0.0414 43.73 0.08 0.0587 52.88 0.14 0.0857 65.29 0.25 0.1307 91.11 0.56 0.25 112.48 0.89 0.39 'Error' 'Error' 'En•or' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'En•oP' 'Error' `Error' APmx oPmxc in H20 in H20 

### choose smallest 0.04 0.0233 0.05 0.03 0.07 0.05 0.09 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.20 0.30 0.37 0.41 0.53 0.57 0.77 0.84 1.18 1.57 2.29 2.35 3.49 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' •Error' 'Error' An ft2

1.2172E-3 1.0231 E-3 8.4539E-4 6.8465E-4 5.4119E-4 4.1427E-4 3.0429E-4 2.5565E-4 2.1146E-4 1.7126E-4 1.2272E-4 9.9402E-5

### TEST DATA PM10 METHOD 201A TEST SITE: Interstate Bricic DC#4 Baghouse Date: 12/5/94 RUN #: #3 Compliance START: 1255 STOP: 1219 point #

1 

### 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

### 10 11 12 AP(201 A)

in H20

0.09 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.19 0.2 0.22 0.23 0.21 

### 0.2 dwell

min

3.20 4.65 4.89 5.11 5.00 5.11 4.65 4.77 5.00 5.11 4.89 4.77 

### act time

decimal



### 315 445 500 500 500 500 445 445 500 500 500 445 Ts



### °F
43 42 41 41 42 41 42 43 42 42 42 42 Tmo

'F
85 85 85 86 87 88 89 90 90 91 92 93

total 57.1 

### avg 0.20 5595.00 41.92 88.42 Actual Time: 57.25 Average Meter Temp: 92.88

,s i ~Tmi Tov Vm vacuum oH SqRt oP

°F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 645.377 85 245 647.096 1.1 0.56 0.0000 89 249 649.384 1.1 0.56 0.0000 93 248 651.763 1.1 0.56 0.0000 96 247 654.158 1.2 0.56 0.0000 99 248 656.548 1.2 0.56 0.0000 100 248 658.968 1.2 0.56 0.4796 93 247 660.926 1.2 0.56 0.4359 99 249 663.227 1.2 0.56 0.4472 101 248 665.631 1.2 0.56 0.4690 103 248 668.044 1.2 0.56 0.4796 105 249 670.444 1.2 0.56 0.4583 105 249 672.738 1.2 0.56 0.4472

27.36 97.33 247.92 1.17 0.5600 0.2681

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 23.4 1.10 0.05 25.31 -0.03

Ps μs Vmds 

### as Mw D50 in Hg mp ft3 f0min μm 25.31 170.70 22.05 0.45 28.3319 9.7058

Average Dn An Vs Iso 

### as in ft2 fvsec 

### % 0.216 2.5447E-4 16.09 185.32 9.4149E+4
Total Mg Cs Cs Emr mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 5.9 5.8987E-7 0.0041 0.06

# American Environ mental Testin g C ompany, I nc.

` 565 South Birch Drive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 268-7111
L/i1130RATO RY DATA 

## EPA Method 201A Compan . -~.~ •~. , s 

### -Faf
~ 

## 8r: c k ~.~. ~ - ~ 

### 3 

## ro...

.. y' 

## , Lt

~~ ~ 

## Run Number. P~'~~ ~ • 

## Sampling Locration: &9k'"f c 0 4 - °y 

## Date• Moisture Collected



## • In1tEal Weight Finai Welght Weight Gain Impinger 1 S~ ~ 

## • 3

~ 

### ' ? y, 6 ,,. - Z-,
~ 

## impingerZ Sc2. 7 

## tzz.3 Impinger 3 y2 6,7 .impinger 4 7

~ 

## 2 , 1 ~ ~s• ~ ~ 

### - 3. ~



## ' Total Gain Z 3 •q 

# ~

Particutate Collected
Plri - 10 Pari3cU"ie t,.asrger Than PM -10 Particuftle 

## 1. Fitter Final Weight: • O• 2..0 1 S 

## Acetone Wash Mg 2. Filter Tare Weight: 0 •1 98 3 Z 

## -3 ~ 

## 3. Net Fitter Weight: o - dv 3 ~ 

## 3• 2 - 4. Acetone Wash Mg: S. Total PM-10 Mg: - ~ 

## --
ftdc Halt Anz"s . • • ~ ~ 

## ._ - 

## - Particulate Caught in lmpingers Mg.


# m

# American Environmental Testing Cornpany, Inc. 565 So uth Birch D rive 

## Spanish Forte, Utah 84664 (801) 286-7111

. . 

# I tr- s -

. 

### Run Number: 

## ~~ - Z 

## ~~ •

ORSAT ANALYSiS 

## (Aaerage of 3 analyses each)

Test Number Yoiume Percent - Dry



## Nttrogen Oxygen Carbon Dixoide 

## Carbon

Monoxide



## ~0.~



# - z r7q
~ 

# c a-o. B' 0.1 < o. ~ 

# -3
Avem g 

## e ~ ~. ~ e Lo.



# a

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

POST TEST ACBTONE EVAPORATION

COMPANY: ~ 'f

'~ 's t""S 63" 2r

- & SOURCE: DC. # f t 

### CONTAINER #2 

### DATE: PARTICLES GREATER THAN PM-10 

### _ ACETONE BLANK Volume of Liquic 3 S~`~ "" t ' Finai Weight CONTAINER #3 Tare Weight A o

a rJ PARTICLES PM-10 

### Residue o-~`~ d ~ 

### OR SMALLER

RUN #1 Volume of Liquic ' ~ `

Color r Final Weight Tare W.eight Residue & Blank

- Blank Residue ~

~ RUN #2 

### Volume of Llquic

Color ' Final Weight ~ Tare Weight ~ Residue & Blank ~

- Blank ~ Residue ~

/ RUN #3 

### Volume of Liquic

COIor Final Weight Tare Weight Residue & Blank

- Btank

~ Residue ~ RUN #1 Volume of LIquic

Color Finai Weight Tare Weight 

### Residue & BIanM

- Blank Residue

RUN #2 Volume of Liquic

Color Final Weight Tare Weight Residue & BIanM

- Blank Residue

RUN #3 Volume of Liquic

Color Final Weight Tare Weight Residue & BIanM

- Blank Residue 20 O — ! s



### c << , 45. $oZ? T t. k o o

- 1 4 

### o.v0Z3 d. oou ~ i.

) .0 013p•OoyZ2 C a ~ 5 e- lG -- 9~ 

### 74 o y

~ 

### y.?s

- ?i



# l ~~

### AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL 565 So. Bircn Drive

Spanisn Foric, TEST 1 NG, I NCOR PORATED 801-266-7111 

### Utan 84660
POST TEST BACK HALF E VAPORAT i ON

CCMPANY: - - ZZ; ~'~ °`'`t A - , `le_ 

### SOURCE: PG 102



### 4 DATE:

CONTAINER s 1 CONTAINER =2 

### METHYLENE CHLORIDE 

### DISTILLED WATER 

### 3 0 ~ "' ` S 

### BLANK BLANK Volume ot Liquid /0 2. 

### Volume ot Liquid 2°y 

### Final Weight 10i- SYs

- 3 z 

### Flnal Weight 7.6 

### Tare Weight Tare Weight ? , a 5` 

### Residue 4- o o 

### Residue o• o 0o L

RUN s 1 RUN s 1 

### Volume ot Liquid zo 

### Volume or Liquid 2-13°



### Colof L/ 

### Color 

# Gc-_._- Final Weight 9Y./7 Final Weight /o Z. s

~~ O 7 

### Tare Weight Qr. /7 Sr Z Tare Weight 4 0 Residue & Blank 

### G. y y L- Resldue & Blank 

### o .0 00 7



### - Blank 

## ° •' 0 v 

### Blank 0-0 o o z 

### Residue Residue o.00 o

RUN s2 RUN s2 

### Volume or Liquid Volume or Liquid 20 0

~ -- <<



### Color Color c-t — -- Flnal Weight T f r Z Final Weight 104 .Yd 1'0 Tare Weight 1 1

5- 7 2 Z 

### Tare Weight /0 G• yD 0 / Residue a< Blank b_ (90 Residue & Blank c) '° o° 1



### -Blank v-OVV -Blank O.oao ,_ Residue 

### 0-0 o v q 0, 1 1 

### Restdue 

### O. o c9 0"7 m• ?

RUN s3 RUN s3 

### Volume oif Ltquld ~~ ~-`~ 

### Volume or Liquid 2-10o



### Color Color r_Ce , Finai Weight fa6.

~ 

### s 2 3 1 

### Finai Weight 45

- . lY.4 1- O Tare Weight !0 ` - yzZ `F Tare Weight 

### p y/`t .? 3 Resldue & Blank 

### d - 00 0 ' 7 Residue & Blank 0 

### - 0 O° * 7

-Blank 0. 000 

### Blank o- 000 '- 

### Residue 10

- a 00 e- 0 14, 

### Residue O • D o o 5" O , ~



# i q3

# Appendix "E"

(Emissions Calculations)

ogmtziaan Envi.%onm.antaC gz4tin9 eo tz#any ffnc.
cRcno, dVevac& J n -fwenZx, c4t;aona c'u 

### .r4.4z nty, Vtafs


### 7o2-786-83S3 6o2-2S3-3354 801-266-7111 

# !9`1

# (=74mEzLcan EncrftonmEnfaf



# ~ : 7 Elfbzcy Com#any,


# ~ nc. 565 csout{'

s 

### L3tu

~ 

### ' s 2

~ 

### z1ve cs/2a ais.4 goa, Q~ ta.4 8¢66o

801-798-8553



# Nomenclature for Particulate Cal'ulations

S m X boi
A g 

### Enqlish Units_

in2 

### Metric Units

m 2 

### Descriction

Stack Area

Can gr/dscf' g/dscm' Particulate - probe, cyclone and fiiter

Cao gr/dscf• g/dscm• Particuiate - total

C at grlCF g/m3 Particulate - probe, cylone ar.d filter

@ stacfc conditions

Cau gr/CF g/m3 Particulate - total



### @ stack conditions
C aw Ibs/hr kg/hr Particulate - probe, cycione and fiiter

Cax Ibs/hr kg/hr Particulate - total

CP Pitot Tube Calibration Factor


### D n in m Sampling Nozzie Diameter y,Eq Percent Excess Air at sampling point

g 32.2 fVs 2 9.81 m/s2 Acceleration of gravity
% I Percent isokinetic 

### y,M Percent moisture in stack gas by Voiume
M d

_ Mole faction of dry ga.s

' 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (790 mm Hg, 20° C)

cRc,so, r

.,/Vevac& 

### Jn - 

### 4oenlx, 

### 44ii.zona cS'aPt 1'a.&e cEty, 2Ctali
702-786-8553 

### 6 oz

- 

### 253

- 

### 3354 8or-z66-71n 

# )a6

### Sm

- 

### mb

- 

### aL English Units Metric Units Descr9otion
M f mg mg Particulate

- 

### probe, cyclone and filter

MH2O 18 Ibllb-moie Molecular Weight of Water

m t mg mg Particulate

- 

### total
MW Ib/Ib-mole g/g-mole Molecuiar Weight of wet stack gas
MW 

### air 28.95 

### Ib/Ib-mole Molecular Weight of air

MW 

### d Ib/Ib-mole g/g-mo(e Molecular Weight of dry stack gas
P b "Hg Absolute mm Hg Barometric Pressure
P m 'H20 mm H20 Orifice Pressure Drop
P s "Hg Absolute mm Hg Stack Pressure
AP "H20 mm H2o Velocity Head of stack gas

Pstd 0 

### 29•92 "H9 760 mm Hg Standard Barometric Pressure O, a ACFM m 3/ h r Stack Gas Volume at Actual Stack condition
O s DSCFM' dscm/hr' Stack Gas Volume at 29.92 "Hg, 528 0 R,dry


### R 21.83 'Hg- Universal Gas Consant

ft3/Ib-mole°R T m OF 

### °C Average Gas Meter Temperature
T t min min Net Time of test
T s OF 

### °C Stack Temperature

Tstd
• 

### 528°R 

### 293 K Standard Temperature

V m ft 3 m 3 Volume of dry gas sampled at meter condtions
V m std dscf' dscm' Volume of dry gas sampled at standani conditions
V s fpm m/sec Stack velocity at stack conditions
V w ml ml Total water collected in impingers and

' 

### 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (790 

### mm Hg. 20° C) silica gel



# I 

# 9AI BIL-1- 1-i

Vwgas scf' scm' Volume of water vapor collected at standard conditions
pair 0.0748 Ibs/ft 3 Dens9ty ofAir
pH20 1 g/ml Density of water

pman 51.63 Ibs/ft 3 Denisty of manometer oil

Standard Conditions: 29.92 'Hg, 68°F (760 mm Hg. 20° C) ' 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (760 mm Hg. 20° C)



# 19l

## Sample Calculations

0 L 

## NOx =(ppmdv) x(1.194 x 10- 7 ) = pounds/dscf 

## ( Ibs/dscf) x(O s Fiow Rate in dscf/hr) 

## = pounds/hour


## Kel CO =(ppmdv) x(1-°/aCO2) x(0.728 x 10 -7 ) = poundsldscf (pounds/dscf) x(Q s Flow Rate in dscf/hr) = pounds/h.our K*q S02 =(ppmdv) x(1.66 x 10 -7 ) = pounds/dscf (pounds/dscf) x(O S Flow Rate in dscflhr) = pounds/hour

1?00'

# Appendix '•F , •

(Cyclonic Flow Determinations)

o4nuzi.aan Envi.zonmrnEuf 9jutL z9 eom#any ffnc.

ez ~ 

### o, dVtvada J
~ 

### {' soenlx, o'

~ 

### si.tona cSaCt 1'aka ei.ty, Q CtaX


### 7oz-786-8553 6oz-z53-3354 8oy

- 

### z66

- 

### 7», 

# 1 0(i

## JE_tirn9 C'o rz#any, -Ync

~ 1 16s cSout/' i `l. '

~ tsj leivt VO'4 qtiaA d'4660
8 Or .266 -77 1 1

~ 

## METHOD 2 CYCLONIC FLOW DETERMINATION DATA FOR14

Plant ( 

## C Location irn 

### Date ! 2. 

### Bar. Press. ("Hg) 

## 25`. 4 ( S Pitot Tube (Cp) b. l i' tf 2-`1 

### Run No . T rc.4-s t' Operator 

## '"1

- 8$ - ReB Amb . Temp . ° F 

## Zf dD Static Press.("H 2 0) Stack Dimensions •i



### Traverse 

## point number 

## Velocity

head 

## (.ap ), in. e 2 0 

## Stack temp.,

°r 

## Cvclonic flow determination

A p at 0° refere nce Angle ( cr )



## wnich yields a niill p



## Z .o L

2 fc p, p Z —
3. O 3 17 , 3 0 2. 

## _v

~ • ~ 

### O 02

Z 

# ?. O C L _ O .



## Averaae anRle (oC ) a rp•~~



### a 

## Average of ac mu5t L

- e < 10 degrees to be acceptatile 490

### ~~ 

### stiny L'om

~ 

### any, ~n~

~ 1 J67 csauk/

~ i bise

~

i

~ Lsiva -spdua 00s ~ qG644 J4660

~ Sor-266-77n

~ 

## ML•THOD 2 CYCLONIC FLOW DETE.RMINATION DATA FORM

Plan t 

## =T • ..~-~5 Location 

## ck
~ 

### Date Bar. Press. ("Hg) Pitot Tube (Cp) 

# r)_ Te)

~ 

# , Run No . Operator 

### Amb. Tesnp. ° F Static Press. ("H 2 0) 4 • O / Z 

### Stack Dimensions 1•00 • 4 Z

Tra•terse point number 

## Velocity

head (.& p), in. 1
~ 2 

### 0 S tack temp .,

°F 

## Cvclonic flow determination

• p at 0 0 ref rence Ang2e ( CC )

which yields a aiill p



## L .o O O

~ O . o 0 d 

### o Z D

~ 10 , o c- . O ~



## .oy v.v _o Z m

,o2

~ 

### o 0



### l 0 oZ •D !0 0 . 3 0


### L O 

## r z

o•03 • ~ 1 • Z (o . L9 

# o• Z °
.DZ Average angle ( oC ) a 0



### ~ 

### • ~ O ~

a 

## Average of eC musL be < 10 degreas to be accepcab.le 

# n.b ~

## 9E_tin9 Corn#a.ny, gnc.

~ - 1 6 ? SouF ~ `~ ise/

~ i

~ Lsiva

; 8u

~ -266•Ti
~

~ 

### ML•THOD 2 

## CYCLONIC FLOW DETEBMSNATION DATA FORM

Plan t 

# 4-

~ 

# 41- e< ULocation 

## pr; 2e--fAWt1 4- 

## Date 

# 2- r

/,6 /4 Y
Bar. . Pr ess .("Hg ) 2 S' • 2

- 

### S 7-- Pitot Tube (Cp) d _ Sr3 % '/ 

### Run No . f?

- ,e +c..5 "
~ 

### - Operator 6,$r-j— 

## - RP Amb. Temp. ° F 

### ~ ' ( 

## Static Press.("H 2 0} — 

# 1•S
Stack Dimensions O - 

### 1 Ys —



### Traverse point number 

## Velocity

head p), in. 2 0 Stack temp. ,



## ° F 

## Cvclonic flow determination

L p at 0 ° reference AngZe ( d )

which yields a niill Ap

V . O ~ 

### 3 Z .J

Z . O-OZ- (o 

### z 0.03
• r ~ o

~ - o

. 3 b . 03 z- a.

. 3 

### 22- ;- .03 2 

### _3 -03 Lo



### Averace angle (aC ) a



### a 

### Average of cc must be < 10 degreas to be acceptable 4 

## ~~--)E1C1lZ5 (..OI7Z)t2a12y, J1ZC.

~ ~ 36J Sout

~ i `L

~ `ise

~ i f 11 si

~ e Jr{bbo Su

~ -zob-7rn


### I 

## MLTHOD 2 CYCLONIC FLOW DETERMINATION DATA FORM

Plan t
r 

### Location dL#' B~~~ ous-t 

## Date 

## /lZJ"

~



## 1 `2 -

-- T ~ 

## Bar. Press. ("Hg) 

# 2 S• 3 I Pitot Tube (Cp) o'• 9,4/1 y 

### Run No. {~i~ 

## e r4
~ 

## r Operator Amb. Temp. °F S tatic Press . ( "H 2 0) -'— yz 

### Stack Dimensions •-/. c/ /7 ¢ -O r C -Z

Ii 

### Traverse 

### point number 

## Velocity

head 

### (s p), in. 1 ~ 2 

### 0 Stac o

k T temp., r 

## Cvclonic flow determination

A p s at 0 ° reference Angle ( W )



### which yields a null -& p

0 3 p 

### 4 1 a L S
o , 12 O • ~ 

## O O •p g O. D 

### / .O O 4- / 3 - O "7 o. 0.0 1 3 

## i .o

Average angle (cC )°



## a Average oF ee must• be < 10 degrees to be acceptable 

# aO)

### 9E_Ein9 Corrz#any, _qrz:.

~~ 1 6 J ~ ou!/ • i L
~ ise ~ Lsivt cS
~ bw+is

~ i

~ os. ~ ZCta
~

i S4bb0
Sor. z66.7111

~ 

## METHOD 2 CYCLONIC FLOW DETE.RMINATION DATA FOR14

Plan t Ais ~ -r.• ~ ~~• e~ l/ 

### Location 

## /-7- pr 72

~ 

## '
Date Bar. Press. ("Hg) 

## L 

## S ^ . 3 I Pitot Tube (Cp) Run No . P~c ~ 

## f . Operator 

## e, cT 4)F# 

## Amb. Temp. °F 4 / 

### Static Press. ("H20} 

## 3
Stack Diaiensions 

## /. 117 q ~ Z



## Traverse point number 

## Velocity

head (.1p ), in .} ~ 2 0 Stack temp.,

° F 

## Cvclonic 

## flow determ ination

•-p at 0° ref e rence 

## Angle (cr )

wnich yields a niill p

Z t ) Z 03 03

~ 67. Z L



### o • 2S 3 Z ' L o , ~ 0.03 o .2-7' o .DZ i m.Z l'J-o



### Average angle (aC ) a 

# 4 (0~~



### a 

## Average of cC must be < 10 degrees to be acceptable aD '/

# Appendix "G"



# (Data-Logger Sheets)

vgrntzican EnvEwnrntnta.f gc4tin9 eo n#any ffnc. rJQcno, dVcvadlr J

~ 

### 4ocnEx, c42tzona
702-786-8553 6oz-253-3354 8oi-z66-pn 

# Ab~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~0~~~~ O~~~s~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~o~~~~~~~~
s~ o~ ~

~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~w~ o~ 

# o

~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ 

# . .

~~ ~



# °, o

~~~~~~ ~~~~B0e~0 0~ ~~v~~ °~~ ~~~o~a °

s~a 

## ■ o ~®~
~~a~~o~ ~ 

### 0ao ~~~

~~ ~~~ ~~~ !_~~®

~ o~ ~o~~~~~~

12/
~ //94 S02 Averages for the #3 Kiln Inlet ( Run #1 Run # 2 Run #3 1 654.1 460.5 558.7 2 683 374.7 547.9 3 651.5 486.14 551.6 4 534.1 573.8 552.7 5 420.9 591.4 567.3 6 536 580.5 570 7 838.6 586.5 569.6 8 746.9 583.7 569.5 9 701.9 580.2 564.5 10 695.5 565.8 547 11 689.5 559.8 537.6 12 689.2 566.7 531.8 13 544 574.6 533.1 14 442.7 577.9 533.4 15 432.6 588.5 546.6 16 594.1 612.1 554 17 726.4 615.9 555.6 18 655 619.3 554.6 19 625.2 629.4 551.1 20 609.6 631.9 538.4 21 596.7 633.8 527.6 22 574.6 636.4 521 23 559.8 641.6 516 24 546.9 650.4 518.8 25 537.6 648.6 518.5 26 538.7 655.1 523.9 27 544.3 659.8 547.1 28 538.7 656.3 559.1 29 549.4 647 579.8 30 554.3 601.7 584.6 Averages a 600.39 593.00 547.71

. -.._ . ~ ..



## /1417

### ~ 

### •
- . 

# _ •
_ _

~

### ■■ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ 

# , ° ~

~~~~_~~~~~ 

### • • ~~ ®~



## ~ 

# O~_~~_ ®~__~_~_~_ • ®

~i~i~ ~~~~ • i - i~t • ~~_~®~ 

## ' 1 • -

~~ ~ 

## ~~ ~~~~~~ ~



## __ ~ 

## !

4■ ~ V
.. ~ 

## 1■ 

## ~► 

## ~ 

## _ ~

- - )/If /

# Appendix "H" 

# (CEM Readings)

_ -. ... ~ 

# .

ogrnaucan ~nv~~ 

## con»z
~ 

## ntaC 9"tfn9 eonz#any ffizc.
tJQcRo, Iz/vavada JPfoenix, c4slsona csart

- 

### CaL eP#y, QLtA


### 70z-786-8553 6o2-2S3-3354 80,

- 266

- 7m


## H1217//94 Nox Averages tor the #3 Kiln Inlet
Run #1 Run # 2 Run #3 1 34.7 35.3 39.6 2 31.7 36.1 40.6 3 32 36.6 41.2 4 19.2 37.2 41.2 5 15.1 37.3 41.2 6 18.8 37.2 41.3 7 27.6 36.8 41.5 8 33 36.7 40.8 9 34.7 36.4 41.1 10 35.4 36.3 41 11 35.6 35.7 41 12 34.4 35.5 41 13 20.1 35.2 40.9 14 15.6 34.6 41.3 15 14 33.6 41.3 16 20.4 33.4 41.3 17 32.7 33 41.1 18 36.6 32.6 41 19 37.9 32.5 40.6 20 38.1 32.4 40.2 21 38.3 32.9 39.4 22 37.8 32.7 38.8 23 37.6 32.6 38.8 24 37.8 32.6 36.2 25 37.7 33.1 35.4 26 36.9 29 36.4 27 37.6 29 37 28 35.6 16.4 37.4 29 35 12.9 37.9 30 37.2 17.5 38.7
Averages 31.303333333 32.44 39.84

-)il/-1216//94 Nox Averages for the #4 Kiln Inlet
Run #1 Run # 2 Run #3 1 12.3 12.9 9.8 2 12.9 12.7 9.7 3 13.3 12.4 9.6 4 13.8 12.5 9.8 5 13.6 12.5 9.5 6 13.6 12.5 9.2 7 13.8 12.3 9.3 8 13.9 12 9.5 9 13.8 12 9.3 10 14 11.8 9 11 14.1 11.8 9.1 12 13.8 11.7 8.9 13 13.5 11.2 8.6 14 13.7 11.1 8.5 15 13.8 11 8 16 13.7 10.7 7.7 17 13.4 10.6 7.3 18 12.9 10.6 7.1 

### 19 13 10 7 20 13 9.8 6.7 21 13.1 9 7 22 13 8.7 7.6 23 12.9 8.5 7.7 24 13.1 8.4 7.9 25 12.9 8 8.2 26 12.9 8 8.5 27 12.8 7.7 8.9 28 13 7.9 9.1 29 13.1 8.4 9.4 30 12.9 9 9.6 Averages =



### -- 13.32



### -:: •:Y: ~

. .. .:... .. . 10.52 8.58



### .



# sO12/61/94 S02 Averages for the #4 Kiln Inlet

Run #1 Run 

### # 2 Run #3 1 185.2 137.6 211 2 197.3 146.8 211.3 3 206.2 153.1 205.2 4 206.2 154.1 199.4 5 208.5 157.1 191.7 6 205 155.6 186.7 7 207.7 153.1 186.1 8 208.9 147.9 184.8 9 212 142.2 178.5 10 211.4 142.8 178.1 11 217.6 142.7 177.9 12 213.1 142.1 174.9 13 211.8 141.7 173.7 14 211 144.5 176 15 217.6 142.2 175.7 16 220.8 140.5 173.1 17 225.8 139.7 174 18 223.7 136.7 172.3 19 217.1 132.3 166 20 215.8 128.8 165 21 209.7 129.6 164.7 22 209 124.8 166.5 23 213.6 129.5 173.4 24 211.3 132.6 177.1 25 214.7 127.2 180.7 26 212 122.4 183.9 27 209 120.2 190.2 28 211.5 122.2 189.1 29 213 116.8 187.1 30 213.5 121.9 183.5
Averages 

### = 211.33 137.62 181.92 0



# 7dk'12/6/194 Nox Averages for the #4 Kiln Outlet
Run #1 Run 

### # 2 Run #3 1 13.1 11.1 10.6 2 13.2 11.1 10.6 3 13 11.1 10.5 4 13.3 11.2 10.5 5 13.3 11 10.4 6 13.1 10.9 10.5 7 13.1 11.3 10.2 8 12.9 11.2 9.9 9 12.5 11.3 9.4 10 12.3 11.2 9.1 11 11.9 11.2 8.5 12 11.8 10.9 8.3 13 12.1 

### - 10.9 8.1 14 12 10.9 8.1 15 

### . 11.8 10.7 7.9 16 11.7 10.7 7.8 17 11.6 10.9 7.7 18 11.5 10.7 7.6 19 11.5 10.8 7.6 20 11.4 10.7 7.6 21 11.4 10.9 7.5 22 11.4 11 7.3 23 11.4 10.8 7.4 24 11.6 10.8 7.2 25 11.3 10.7 7.2 26 11.4 10.7 7.1 27 11.6 10.6 6.9 28 11.5 10.9 6.7 29 11.8 10.6 7.2 30 11.7 10.6 8.1 Averages e 12.073333333 10.91 8.45



# aP1216//94 S02 Averages for the .#4 Klin Outlet

Run #1 Run # 2 Run #3 1 50.7 36.7 27.8 2 54.8 31.2 24.9 3 49.2 26.1 22.2 4 46.6 21.9 20.6 5 43.1 19.6 21.3 6 41.8 18.9 20.8 7 43.6 19.6 20.3 8 43.6 20.7 23.4 9 42.6 19.9 25.4 10 42.9 19.9 27 11 38.9 20.9 27.7 12 34.8 20.7 28.4 13 34.3 21.4 31 14 34.1 221 29.7 15 31 20.8 31.5 16 29.9 21.5 31.7 17 30.6 22.6 31.5 18 27.9 23.3 33.3 19 27.7 24.7 33.3 20 29.4 25.1 31 21 27.9 27.2 32.1 22 29.2 27.7 33.4 23 29.6 28.7 32.8 24 28.6 29.5 33.5 25 29.1 29.6 36.1 26 27.5 30.7 34.1 27 28.5 29.5 34.4 28 28.8 34.7 33.6 29 30.2 35.4 33.7 30 30 35.1 34.3
Averages = 35.56 25.52 29.36

.. 

### ~ ~

# Appendix "1"

(VEO Readings & Certification Cards)

c4mtzfcan EnvizonmznEaf 9zstin9 eorn#any ffnc.

eezno, dvzvaL2 P40anzX, 474-uzonQ .&6 -fakr e

~ y , 2cEan'


### 702-786-85S3 6o2-253-3354 80,

- 266

- 7111

### ~~~ -~ 

### J,

# ~

., G - .

# ~

# rh,7L . 

## ~~ 

## . fLI25 0I7L fiQl2 

### ~~ 

## ~ 

## t2C.

SCURCF NAME lntcrsfu Qu-4,+l LOGITTCN 

### Lc1e'r t J e r ~~u~' ~ c, 7T,1 /f MA21NG AOORESS . C1TY ST Lt PhlONE

~ I SCURCECONTiaCT 

### J ;w. xC, l< Svl-ao6- 7 »>

Vlsib/e Emisslon F'

'eid Qxlmentatfon

( S~ MIN o 13 30 4,? 

### 1
ATE 3 2 1P Z 

### ~ C~ C ~

~ 3
4
S CP TTME 5 y:~~ r7ATING MODE T ~ ~ p
ATING MODE 8 ~`~ ' ~



### 9 to I 11 'O CBSERVEa 12 

### OBSERVEa i3
14 I

~ 

### 15 TlNUCUS 1'$ 16 M177EN7 G tT
CHED G 

### ex;+. 

# 19 ( I

`17 21 WIND SPE?D ~ I I p ~ e



## 2J I I 

# I RH. percent 

# 2° I I

~ '-s rdw NOrtA Arrpw 2-1 I '



### 2T I 

## 28 I I 29 3o AVE-'?AGE OPACTIY FCR OBSE.

~ VATICN G4TF START T1ME o 

### JZ—o5
- 9y 9:30 PRCCFSS ECUIPME

~ IT FUEL TYPE OPE '~' ~ B /` ~ `c% Pro f o c 4

. • o/i ~ %~ {r;G /~ CONTRCL ECUlPMF. j VT OPEq BCt

~ ia tJi

~ ~C/ ~~C~

iy LiMe`

~ 

# q

~ CESCRlBE E.LflSS10N PCINT .E ~l~ ~- ~ i'o.-ti Fa. ~ l~%u~ J• ri HEIGHT ABOVE GRCUND L.. =VEL HEIGHT RELATIVE
~ 

### y F r 

### et 

### y F~ ~7 L OISTANCE FROM OBSF.r

~ VEF7 D/RECTICN FRCM Z - O.

~ e a ~ c rfl , (.

~ i cS f" DESCRIBE c'1NISSlONS W I

~ 

### , t

- a 

### / bccre ly Ui.c ~ 6r ~ i~~t~ a I1
E~ fISSlON COLOR PL!!ME 7YFE CON

~ cJ

~ ^• ~ 

### /4 ^ FUGITJVE G INTEA WATER ORCRLETS PRESF-NT. 1F WATGR CRCPLc'T NO YES O 1ATrACHED G CETA fW int in the Plume at Which Opaclty was CetermineC S~ •ek

~~ c, s ~ cfe ~ a~un 7 f/ore ~.~ OESCRIBE 34CX RCUND etc. ~
, G/ ce.t S, e 

### ~ f~ Si(YCCNClTIC S aND CCLOR

G/'a lwllycctRzcl-ICNI C 

## f ot+ 

## l 

## w . Q ^J. Ld_ AMB1E'VT TE:NPEAA7URE WEi 3 UL9 rEMP. I

~~ t ~ ~ SOURC

~ c L4YCtJf SXEZ'H D P► ume Sun
w► nd E ~n~~ iorr Pbint 0 

### T y ~ 

### dcfS 

## ~

n ryi .33:0

~ pc;N.4—

--- ~

~

.. ~

....

u{- T-S J,-

~ ~ C

COMMENTS (Descrrbe Obaervatlon Fbinq Ob

~ ens ~ a Asaitton • 

### j h e e X; -

~ 

### - o-F -} ~ ~. e F~~ 

### . 1- ~o ~:~,

---- ~~ e ~ "~ ~ C~ r e < ~ t ~ ~ u ~ ~ • ~ u ~-F ~.6 ~ ~ 

# . +— y r
~ ~

su~ coarlon cx. ~ 

### reu,. c l ._( uJ e cf f ~'~ CBSlAVEr '75 I e e v ~~ a.(' a bu

~ lL q t e ~ L . + d ~ 

### ces

~ 

### . s sr CATE /7-

- oS-9LI CRCaN1Z,4T1CN 

# A. c .i: La .D F— C L

~~ 

## -9y

~ ~~,DESCRlBE BACxGRCUND (Co/or, etc)

~ rc-ev ~ S- , 

### dE C'F Qc.i /4" 21 

### S~ ~ C NCtTTO S~ 1 ND



### ~ COLOR L~ W1NC 01REC 7 CN
w~ 

### iW/ND SPE_D



### i o- ~s~o~ 22 I I I

23 

# I I AMB/E'VT TE,LfPEF7ATURE WET BULB TEbIP. RH. peroenf I

SraGr SOUACE LArcurBxFCH oraw• No m Anow w;rn

S ~ 

### Wtno
Emrs

~ lor► Pbrrrr 2-1 •



### - ~ 27 ~ ( 28 

### I

29 X AVE4AGE OPACJTY FOR H/GHEST PE71C0 CCMMENTS (Ceacrrbe Observatlon Point) 

### a,,•

~ 

### p

~ 

### c



# I _. _ - T

_ _ _ • /j

~~ 

# t Cl29 017L
~ 

### Q12L1 ~ 

### J12C. For-266-7Tr7

~ 

### l Vlaible FmissJon F{s!d Obcumentatforn SCURCF NAME n gK M!N 0 13 30 <q LCCATlON 

### Lcl e.s -t ~-~ r ~ t 4,. ~ 

## urA l-F 1 G I 0 O I C

Z ~ O I ~ 0 MAIL/NG ADDRESS , C1TY STATF & Z/P 

### crr. ~~ 3 0 

### o c o PHCNEN ^URCFCCNTACT

~ J ,M 1Cecv

s o G c O OBSc'r?VA770N CIATE /2

- Cr

- 9l START TlME STt7P TJME li;2.0 11:Z6 8 v C C O PRCCFSS ECUlPMENT w- L! 8rr

~

- L PrbdaCf

f`eH FtlEL TYPE IOPErZ477NG MODE G/ecf

~~ c /-

- u // 7



### g CCNTRCL ECUlPME1VT OPE3ATJNG MCDE
DESCRlBE EMISSION PCINT 10 

## ~ AE

~ 

### Xr 4- '

~ 

### r'o.. ~ 

### 1=a,,c J~ o Ks ~ ~ ~ • 

### fi t~ i'sS ; c

~ c o, n - k 

# I HE;Gt+T A80VE GRCUND LEVEL y ~ --t 'e

-fHEIGHT RELATIVE Tt7 06SERVE.R y ~ c 7- iz DISTANCE FRCM OBSc'RVEFI Zo 7- D1RKT7CN FRCM OBSFRVE3 /V o/• fk LveS t 13 14 

# _ ~ DESCRIBE EM1SS10NS r,oh

~ 1-e h-e-1 u

~ s: 61e i` 

### ~ 'a f 4 1/ is EMlSS1CN COLOR lir k+ f

- e 1;4a,4 PLUMETYPE CONTINUCUS FUG/T1VE Q pVTERMITTENT Q is I 17 I 

# I Wi4TER CROPL_°TS PRESENT. NO 41

- YES Q 1ATrACRED IF WATEr'i ORCPL..

°T PLUME: Q CE'ACHE:7 CG 18 F , Z K 

## N o uJ t '

Poirrt rn ttre Plume at Whrch Cpat~ty was Cetermined ig l ,S f4 c K Qf

~ a rC e ft ¢ r a wcf.

- ~ rcwn h ~.~ ., Ex 20 o V eP v I c f ~ e ~ ~

QQ++rrer ~ Po

~ ltlon


### 1404,

~~ !'rA.5f y clfjcf' Sun 

### I~ @
CsSErWERS MAJiE(Prtnq

~ 

### dd `

~~



### i e,. ~ 

### ~ u 9 ~ rrc~~ bQckg ~oan~~ Iz-os-9

I CRGAN/t.', ~ TTON ` ' ~ CF: ~ TIFE7 d7


### ,~ . G, / Uo 

### ~~ 11/ 

### ~ 

## --217-7>

# 'N

Obvsoara A6sIHon 

### sol-266-7171 - -T---
SCURCF NAME c # Siafers

~ a fe 13 /` ~ (~ !~ arc 3 S MIN ~ 0 15 I 30 45 LOC.ATTCN WeS'1 ~ Co ~ ~~ «,1 C.CTA ML 1 p c c c^ 

### Z~ o o+ G p MAIL/NG AQQRESS C17Y STATE dc 21P uTf! ff 3 0 o( o o PHCNE I SCURCE C.7NTACT 1( c c lL 

### 4 C. o l c - + C 5 o C+ c+ C 08Sc'RS/ATION CATE SiART lZ — o,S- 9'-1 

# I T1ME l•' o a om 

# 1 S~ P 77ME

/; D 6 ;•. 

### e o c+ C ~ PRCCFSS ECUIPMENT r #~ H 

## 6

~ tcic /

~ rodkc

~ , o., Fi1EL TYPE OPEr3ATlNG MOQE



### )SlC,fr,`c l=oa !I 7 

### e CONTROL ECUIPMEVT OPEaATiNG MODB IQ r_ 

### ~ i e u 

### F e ~7 e - C

' l ~ ~`. ► e ~~ 1

~ ca DESCRIBE c':NlSSION PCINT ,EX i4' AP c , H

- O U,( r H 10 I ! 11 I l hlE1GH7 ABCVE GRCUND LEl/EL q 

### Tz z f NEIGI-IT RELATIVE Tl7 08Sc'rTVER y Ff e f 

### 12 ~ OlS'ANCE FROM OBSEAVER 2.o f OlRECT1CN FRCM OBSc'RVER )1/c9r+K 13

l ° DESCAIBE E

~ + SS/0N5

QaTe 

### l u

~ 

### s ~ 

### b/ei

~



### `

~ 

### , r L Q

~ 

### / 15 I 

### I I I EL11SS1CN CCLOR PLLIMETYPE CONT/NUCUS 4L FUGITJVE C INTEr?MIT i ENT C 1s 

### I (



# ~ 17 I 

### I I I



### I WATER QAOPLE'3 PRESc'NT. IF WATER OROPL—Fi PLUME Pc n4-



### - NO,;s ~ YES C ATTACNEQ C CtTACf.I EQ C 18 I 

### o v

~ 

## ~ C T I

26 Pofrrt fn ttle Plume 

### at WhiCh 

### Opac: ty wai Cetermkred I S 4crc 1, 1

- p i a , •e4-

~ QLi 0.

~ ~ ~ ..t 

## P. K e x ;-f

~ 

### 18 I ( I

~ p QESCRIBE EACXGRCUND (Color, 

### atc l (S b c i Ic1 i r t C 

### t 21 I ( I I SXYCCNCITIC 

### 4, aN0 G7LOR 

### C/o4d y 

### ~l J ur 

### ~ CGrc, W/NQ O/RECT! WINQ 

### S?E=D
~ ~ 2-7 

## ~



## + ~ 

## + AM81E'VT TE'+•1PERATiJRE 

### y~ 

### °F WE! aULS TEMP.



### -— AN. rer

~ ent 

### Za Stxu ~ SOURCE L,U'CUTSXLrCl4 Draw Nortlt Arrow witn

{MnQ 

## ~ Eml

~ lort Point

~ _ t 

### 27 18 

## ~ 2-0 I 30 (
AVE4AGE OPACITY FCR

Sun CoGrlorr cine

~ ur< 

### / odd SO"L 16 u- lJ 1'0 q CS 

### re@ I 

### -) a s ci 

### b li 

### c~~ yrc uHJCBSERVER'S 

### DaTE 

## /z — os-- q 

# I CRGA N1Z4TICN CcRT/FiErJ 9Y CATe' 

### A E

. ~ : 

### I k110F(:! ~ 110 - 

### C,y CCMMENTS (Descrrbe CbservaUon FbiRq 

# I %Ae e.Y ~ 

### + o+ +'.Q

6rce rc.LS ~ 1 d cx c f 

### c, b c" 4- 1 

### F

- c e f q bev-e f (

^ie rc,o d , 

### -T d

- ~ 

### t.e

# ~

• 

# 7 ~~ 

# fcnc ~ 

# om/2ar_y,

SCt1RCF NAME %~ 

### B 1 < — ~ —'•5 1 < ~Q f M/N 0 15 30 43 LCGiT10N 

### g r f Gk 

### Crus ~< r C~r•~ 

### z Z I 1 ~ C C O Z ~ O p( O MAlUNG AOORESS

. C1TY STATE 3 Z!P
PHONE# SaURCFC."7N7AC7 ~
5 CD OBSERVATICN D4TE 

### jZ —C ✓ 6— 9 SrART nME



### lI 

### ;30 S TCP TfME

~i ~ 36 e d 

### o 0 0 PROCFSS ECUIPMEIVT F„-; 

### L z Ir FUEL TYPE 8 l'i G
~

G /` Cd S 1+T `k( /`i C OPEt

~ AT1NG MODE /C 4 l ' T 7 ~ ,1, 0 g OPrRATJNG MOOE CCNTRCL ECUIPMENT A;u fl 9 DL; IBE ELIISSION POlNT C` VLrtG( dw Lty 4AC 6rCLW-1 10

---- S07-2 ~ ''6-7171 Visibie Ernlsalen P~ DoclmentatloR

HEIGHTABOVEGRO NDLEVEL 

### L/ Fc-c 7` HEIGHTRELATIVETDOBSERVER 

### S FC. e. 11 

### g a t
F/ 1

u

L

L 0 

### w

/ 

## ~~ J 

# Li 17

~ f 12 13 DISTANCE F_ROM OBSc'RVER 

### Z.$' f' z r f DIRECTION FROM 08.SERVER



# ^,) o r f'K 14 DESCRIBE EiLfl IONS

V C I` joZ".• i-p cc. ~ y~ 'f -« i8 I ~ flSS N C LOR
c... PLlJME TYPE CONTINUCUS j$' FUGITlVE Q INTEr':MITTENT Q iT W4 IF TER OROPLET PLUME WATER OR F iS

OPL PRESENT. NO X YES L

- 1 1g ATrACHED Q DEiACHED C

, Pbint fn the Plume at Wh1ch Cpecity waa Determined /1 l

" a,« e f r ✓ Q GlJa 1 nc ~ e~ o f d-'F t ✓ u c 7~ 

### 10 DESCRIBE 8&1CXGRCUND ( lor, etca 

### Brct,u., 1 SiCY CON0177ONS ANO COLOR c ! o c.c c ~ ~ WIND Cl ECTION oU • r - WINO SPEED

~

/o !

~ 5 0`

~ °
~ ` AMBIENT T E~ b1PERA7LRE. 

# _3 8e-fWEi BULB TEMP. 

## ~ RH. peloent 24
ZJ 5 SIiCU ~ $atARt" .Flr4Yt'UTSltE

~~ t Or ~ 1VNOIMtAROW with plYfffe 

### sw 

## ~ W1lQ

~~~~ 'Eml ~ Jlon ~ inl

- 

### CEwr MS Pzt/Ger►

-- ` ' '

4°e

~ 

### U~ UM 26 

### 27 .

29 

### 29

. '10 AVERAGE HIGHEST OPACIfY

PERIOD

. FCR

CCMME 1 I7S (Descrrbe ODservaUon Pbintq



## vL,-;4re au~- ~.~. 

### ro6 a bl bpcau,s'e c f
P u.

~ r F c kJ , 08SFRVEa ME(PtiRq T

~ > ./ / v c ~ ~ ~ • ~ ,K7, ~/~ S ° H OBSc r?i/ERS SI

~ A RE



### % CWTE

~ 

### z - ~ 

### -9y ~ CRCaNIZAflON



## 7' CF-

- T1F E:7 BY OATE



## x~

# 'N bcjOCO

~ Vlaible E-nlaslon FsJd DbcJmentatforr S CU RCF NAME

~ J SEC k 

# I MIN 0 1$ 

### ~ 30 I6 LOC.zTION 1 O I o I e 1,0

— 

### 8 t; ck

- 

### C MA/LlNG ADDRESS , c17 y ,g;, 

### ~~ & zIP 2 ~ 7 O 3 

### o c c' O PHCNEM SCURCFCv^NTAC1 4171

~ fly 

### 4 

### J ;,„ Ko --(c CBScR/A770N QATE STAR7'77ME SOP T1ME S 6 D e+ o 

### /Z-oG- 9y /: tio PnK /:y6 rrK 6 p a o© PRCCFS.S ECUIPMENT FUEL TYPE CPErZ477NG MCCE 7 1 0 

## 6 <<zz l y Br.; . k Crr.s1.er

£'/erlrr /=u I/ CON7ROL EOUlPMENT CPE4ATING MCOE 8 

### ,,s FG l / 9 ( 

## ~ DESGRIBE E.VISSICN POINT 10 ( ou. ~ o( G i4 ~«

, -~ Gc r.

, ~ 

### t fti r Gr cu,~( ~ 

### s e 11 HEIGHT ABOVE GRCUNDLEVEL HEIGHTRELATIVE MCBSc'RVErT ~ y I'c'z 4- v'` f = c ef- 12 DISTANCE FRCM 08Sc'.RVER DIREC710N FRCM OBSEr?VEea 13

- 

## zo
~ 

## z f IV. F . DESCRIBE EMISSlONS 14 I 

### L r k
~ - 

### U e t` ' 7

o c ur ca ~ - 

### a
~ 

### / EMlSSlON COLOR PLUME 7YPE CaN71NU0US

~ $' 16 I I Tu..^ F{lG177VE Q INTERMlTI ENT Q f7 I WATFRdRCPLEiSPRESEN7;IFWATEADRCPL°i PLLIME NO YES O ATrACHED L7 CETaCHED G 18 

## ~ 1 ftnt in tRe Plurrre at Which Opacfty waa Cetermined 19 I 

## ~ I c

~ 

### ru ~ 

### «eft!` 

### away `~re~ ~5~ 

### c(c 

### ear ~ DESCRIBE BACKGRCUND (Co/cr, etcj ~ ( 

### " f -e of 8r,cl'-s 

## ircw• ✓ L 21 SKYCONCtTlCNSANDCaLOR WI CC/RECTION WINDSPE20 22 I I 

### C/ G reLy

~ 

### li , E I (,3'-Z o 

### /►+ 

## f N E

.
~ AM81E'VT reMPEAATURE WET BULB rEMP. RH. per

~~ nt


### - ~ Z

- 

### r ~ -- 24 

# I i
Sracu SCURCF LAYCUT SXE

- MM Draw Nartlt Am7w 25 • wiUf 26 Plwrre Sun Wirtd ~ 

### 28 Emission Fbint 

### 29 -V AVERAGE OPAClTY FOR HIGHEST PERIOQ CCMMENTS (Deacrrbe Cbaervadon PWnq
Odsnera Pkbltton 

### c

%cJ'F 

## T't P ' fs

m



### 140 0

~ I sun cocanon L;n. 

## UFl
~ 

## );'F'Hl.i -rL1uc+

~ 

### 4I 1 y 'Fra ,rA
- e 

## xc - e S,S 

# vxo , * ,r,lL, I C 8

~ 

# % o' R NAAJ

~ i 

# jes

~ 

### C.aTE /Z. -C

n ~~

# ~ 7~ <f~ 

# r_cJ
~ 

# om ~ 

# ant

- 

# Y r_c.



# J / V/sib/e E17/sslon FTs/d DocLmantatlon bUl
- 2ri0

- 7T71
SOURCF NAME SEC



### er i ck R u" 0 3 M!N 0 15 

# 1 , 70 

# 1 45 

# 1
LOCAT10N 

# t 2C ,rrY STArE a Z)P

urAti p I p I o iOURCF CCNTACT c~ )~ Krc!! 4 O O I 6 O 5 I o ~ O o iTART TIME 3:10 P M STCP TlME

3:1(Cl pM 6 o p Ft/EL TYPE OPERAT)NG MCDE 

# ~ Bf'ickCrwl,er G r ,E/ecFpP c


## ~

~ '- 'le 9 CC

~ N 1 7RCL r

F CUIPMENT OPF c A 

## ~ / MODE /,cC DESCA18E EM1SS/0N PO1NT R ok,ec ~ 6ra ~u c f (~o ~ n

~ ard ftie Grou.

~ ( 11 10



### ~~ AA 

# ~ HEiGHT ABOVE GR UND LEVEL yF

- C ct HEIG97 RELATlVE Tt7 CBSERVEFi 6 F
~ --cf 12 D/STANCE FROM OBSEtaVER 

### Z o F

~ 

### z DIRECT/0N FRCM OBSE4VER

~ 

### ! . E . 13
14 DESCRIBE EMr 10NS



### Ve r ) i 1fle i a nr a f G/ ~ 

### 1s E MISS ICN COLOR 7
- c` ,c PLUME TYPE CONTINUOUS aC FUGJTIVE Q lNTERMITT ENT Q 16 I I
1 T I 

# I I WATEr ~ DRCPLc i3 PRESEiV7.° NO 9L YES u 1FWATEr? DRCPLET PLUME ATTACHED rJ DETACHED C7 18 Fbint irt the P ume at Which Opacity was Detetmined J cl ~ a vle , Fe r' cL wc. irrcr..+ ex: i- of ,Ok cf 19

~ 

# I
~ DESCR/BE S.zCXUD (Color etc.) 

### B f
- o w

~ o 

### ~~ a% 

### ~ in i n~ 

### (,e o 

# l :S`1'QHc 

### ~ 21 SKY CONDlTT NS AND COLOR 

### Paril Clc

~ 

### d W/ND DlRECT/ON 

### N. E. WIND 

### SPEED

/o-rSr+oX 

### 22 I

~ I 

# I AMBIENT TEMPEAATUAE i/ Z ° F WE; BULB TEMP. RH. pe >cent 24

~ 1 M ~



### wrna ~ P► ums S un SOURCE 

### LAYt7UT SKL

~ '7CN Oraw Norrh Anow



### G Z5 •



### ?6 ZT I ADORESS
PHONE,M

OBSEr?VATJON DATE



# po~ ~

28 FmWlon Pbint 29

~ X AVEFtAGE OPACITY FOR ,.: H/GHEST PERIOD COMMENTS (Desctibe Observatlon Point)

, Obsene a Ru/tlon o.rtl y QnV V ~.~ i b

~ r Cw ~ ~140e r \ Ct 7' ¢ / f ` sun Loeatton une c uC14 E (,u 0-4 f' ► e ~ 44 i•'l 

# L OB T J RS N 

# ~ E(Prin



# ~~ qa/ 

# ~ ''( f

-- yv► E 

### i J T

~ 

### l!'

~ 

### •

DATE /Z

- O a rOA 

# ~ N! 

# ~ ON I CEATlUE 

# ~ ~ Q I~0

- .91/ I
-9 / il

# l,~ /
J~

# rz c-*z.cca.n GncTCZOnm_

~ 

# nccL ~ 

# sfLn9 ~ omt-any, J/

na

.
I c 1 ~ 

### ParcEsfi at) ~ 

### 2CEa4 8¢66o So1-266-7111 Vlalb/e Emlsalon FFeid Dbcumentatlon SCURCVAM 

# fi SFC IMIN



### ~



## d O

I 

### I

I

FOR 

# vIU O


## s

~ 

### S

I



## - ~



# ~ 

# f

• 

## '00 ~ 6

1 10 LOC.

~ TJON

, 1 

# 2

- a
~ MA/L.NG AOC EaS CJTY S'iAT E 3 Z1P



### ~ ~~ ~ I PHCNE.I 

## SOW Eq ACT .• ~ ~ 

## S--

5 

## -3 ~ OBSE.RVATlON 

## G1TE

C 

## ~

A TIME /.~ SlOP TlME 

# 1 /504 6 

### S' - PA FSS QUlP ENT Pue TYPB CPE TlNG MO E T 8 CONTROL (lP ENT 'bPERATING ME 

### g OESCRIBE EM/SS10N PqIN7 rQ

1J H T ABOVE GROUNO 

### LEVEL

S' HElGHT RELATfVE 

### 37 OBSERVER

— 12 0157ANCF FAOM 08SERVER OlRECT1CN FRCM 08SERVER 13 I

. r4 OESCR! E EN/S610NS

~ ~ , ' 15 lSS10 C A PCl1ME TYPE C NUOUS 

### ~ (,^ FUGlTTVE O INTERMITTENT Q 16 

# 1 1

17 I 

### WAT r'f OROPL.°TS 

### PRESEiVT• NO G YES 

# l A rrACHED !F WATEr? OAOPL ~ PLUME

ETACHED Q 18 , 

### Parnt ! lRe Plume sf fctt Opaclty 

### was Oetefmfned ig I
^R1BE CXGA NO ( or, etc.)

~ 21 (

~ KY CCNO! bN5 aN CC A

, wINO QIAE ON wrNO 

### SPEED l 1e ~ - J

~ -d 

### 22 + +

2S ( MBIEivT 

### ~ ,NPERATi1RE WET BULS rEMP. 

# I RKpercent 24 (

StsrJr SCURCE LAYCUTSXE704 Oraw Non1t Anow wftA Plurrr ~ Sun 

### ~ ~ Whd
~ r Emla„bn ~ lJlnt ~ ~

G1Nsr+ers f~ tlflbr ~



# ----= - -

Sun Cocatron Une 25 26 

### 77
ZB 29 30 AVEFlAGE HIGHEST OPACJTY

PEaf00 COMME.NTS (Oescrfbe Obaerva(/on Pblrtt)

~ ~

OBSERVE 5 NAME(Pr r~ l. +

~ 

### ,/D/1

~•~



### Sd, ✓ OBSERVERS slGNATUA pATE

I Cc

~ • r- ~~ i 7ns ~ BY
~ ~ .~ 7~~I O 

### 0/E @ 0



## NSTATE OF UTAH

. D1VIStON OF AIR OUAUTY ' This eensees that 

### RYAN BEVSON ' r

. , >s ~ •y ~ r has suocaaatully eampleted fhe V(s>bts Enissions Evaluadon. ~ Course conokrGed bX ther



### ~ jivisia n of AUCwUty and has met the r 

### r minimum roquir sments

n ~ rg

oq e`va

~ lL ate visible emissions. r aceording to EPA Me

Dira

~ or. Dtvisfoir of Air Oualtty ; 

## vand mw 

# _ APR 19 1995 ~

~ r r r .r ~ ~ ri r r r r ~ ~ •r r .r ..•

~ at r ~ i. ~ ~ _ ~ _ .

STATE OF UTAH S

— i ATE OF UTAH DIVISiON OF AIR CUAU7Y DIVISiCN OF AIR CUAUTY This cardfies that 

### RICK HAWKINS This cerafles that 

### TODD BE NSON has sucoessfully completed the Visible Emissions Evaluation Course conducted by the Oivision of Air Cuality and has met the minimum n3quirements necessary to evaivate visible emissions. according to E?A Me

Oirecaor. Oivisio o Cuality Valid untrl 1+1fr7[ 20 ' M --- has suc; essfully campleted the Visfbie Emissions Evaluatiort Course conduc:ed by the Oivision of Air Cuatity and has met the minimum requirements necassarv to evaluate visible emissiorts. acconying to E? 9.

Direc:or. Oivision ot Air Cuality Valid until 

## ArR 2 II 1Q-9-F

a~ ~ • r. ~r ~ ~ ~ . . . .. . - . -

..

a. ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ .. -. . . t..: ~.~ ~ ~ s. ~ ` s ~ 1

~ a•r ~ .. + -_ • .I STATE OF UTAH ~ DIV1SiON OF AIR CUAU7Y
~ This cerdfles that 

## DAVID HU NT
': • .:.....-

~ — has successfully completed ttte Vrs+ble. Emissions Evaluatlon Cawse conducsed by the Oirisio 

### n af Aic_ OAry attd hea met the minimum f9QUlremeRtSllaCa33arY : 1 D .^ ev2GJ

~ Le vlStble emis3ions.

~ •• :+ •,ii according oo EPA 

### wx--

~~ 

### J

Dtrecaor, Otvisian o A

~ c VaAd untll STATE OF UTAH DIV1Si0N OF AIR OUAUTY

. This cartifies that 

### JD SC

~ 

### iILLER
has suaeessfully eomplated the Visible ~ Emissions Evaluat[on Course conduC.ed by tha Dh (irio n o( Aic`OuaBty and has met the

• minimum nequirementsnac`essarlCEa.eva ~ ats'^s

~ 1e emissions. arxordtng oo E.°A g_3i

~ ;rl# .

Dlrectar, Dlvision ; ot Aict7wlUy : . Valid untU



# • ~1~ ~

### CARL KOONTZ ASSOCIATES of Nashville, Tennessee This is to acknowledge that 

### G',2 i= C. E. ) oA nf 

### 5 vAl successfully parti ipated in Visible issions 

## tr aining on N 0' r ~



### y--

~ 19

~ 9 

### and is qualified to evaluate Visible Emissions for a period of six (6) months from the date of cenYficatlon.

Instructor 

### 41111 

## f

CARL KOONTZ ASSOCIATES

of Nashville, Tennessee This is to acknowledge that 

## J- eAa. 3ENS0AI successfully p c 

### ~ pated in Visible Emissions 

## tr aining on 

# ~ 6-4*" 

### and is qualified to evaluate Visible Emissions for a period of six (6) months from the date of 

### certification.

Instructor 

### ~



### CARL KOONTZ ASSOCIATES

of Nashv

~

lle, Tennessee 

### This is to acknowledge that V. a2EALT BEAISo,d successfully par

. tt 

### F ipated in Visible Emissions training on 

### N Oy' 4



## 4 /99 !4 = and is qualified to evaluate Visible Emissions for a period of six (6) months from ttie date of certlftcatfon.

Instructor

~ 

## l I /

# Appendix "J" (Calibration Data)

o¢irsazican EnvEwnmantaf 

### ~ :Zcstln9 eorrx#any fftzc. cJQtno, tNevac& J~{~ sotnEac, 

### Ausona 

### .&A _CJS eit y , VE,2.4

702-786-81.13 6o2-253-3354 801-266-7111

# Amefican Environmental TesKing Company, Inc. SoS So uth 8 irch D rive 

## Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 260-7111


## Company: : ~ 

## t i

~~ . ~.~T~ ~: . .. ~ ~ ~ 

## Date:

So urce : ~'~ 

### ` `/ .

~ 

### : ,/

~ 

### .. 

### Ca lib rated By: !' , -7 r ;



## NaZZLF CALIBRATION

Z- 6-4Y 

## Nozzle

IdentfAcatton Number 

## Dy

(ln. ) 

## D2

(in. ) 

## Ds

(in. ) 

## AD

(in. ) 

## D average

~ 

# .sdr

~ i~ 

# - , ,• d-s'oi o•S'o1 

## o.oao o-so?

f 'r



### ~ t /Z_~ ~•Sd L G

. ~o ~ 

## p.5oa d

~ 

## oo z p • S O/



# Where : D1,2,3 = Nozzie diameter measunad on a different diameter, (ln.). Tolerance - measure within 0.001 inches (0.25 mm). eD = Maxim um dif'ference in any two measurements, (in. ). To!esance =0.0041nches (0.1 mm). D average = Average of Di, Dz D3.

nr-1

# Amefican Environmental Testing Company, Inc_ 565 So uth Birch D rive 

## j • Spanish Fork, Uttah 84660 (801) 266-7111


## Company: 

# h_ ~ %~v~ 

## Date:

, 

## Source: Calibrated By: • 

# ~-~

NOZZLF CALIBAATION


## Nozzle ldenttflcattoh 

## Numbe 

# r Dy

(ln. ) 

## D2

(in. ) 

## Ds

(ln. ) 

## eD

(in. ) 

## D average

~ 

# . )3S 3

~ 

# -1 ~l 

# .13

~ ~5 .~ 

# G



# D o


# D , ~ 

# 35 b, l 3

~ 

# ( b.

~ 

# 35 

# D. ooI p. 13L1$

Where: D1,Z3 = Nozzie diameter measured on a different diameter, (in.). Toterance =-measure wiihin 0.001 inches (0.25 mm). ,&D = Maxim um difference In any two measurements, (tn. ). Tolerrance,=0.0041nches (0.1 mm). D average - Average of Di, D2, D3.

-~ 

### i P-"'

# Amefican Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 505 So uth B irch D rive 

## Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 (801) 250-7111
Company: 

# ' ~-~ Date:

So urce: 

# D G ~ 3~a.~~~~ 

## Callbrated By: U~•~•



## iV4ZZLF CALIBRATION

.~

~



### 1:F

~

~ 

# Nozzle

IdenttAcatfon 

## hlumber 

# Dy

(In. ) 

# D2

(in. ) 

# D3

(in. ) 

# eD

(in. ) 

# D average

~ 

# s o. a

~ 

# .j c,. a•s a.a

~ 

# s o. ~~ 

# s o.

~ 

### od 

# o.a

~ s 

# l/

~ 

### j. /S

~



### j. /S O • /S O . /.S O . GCC O. /

t~ 

## .--2 1s v.

~~ 

## y ~~~.~ ' ~



### ~ •d



## p./S 

## p.

Y+rhere : 

# D1,2.3 = Nozzfe diameter measun:d on a different diameter, (in.). Tolerance p. measure wfthin 0.001 inches (0.25 mm). &,D = Maxlm um difterence in any two measurements, (in. ~ 

## Tderar:ce =0.044 inches (0.1 mm). D average = Avefage of Di, D2, Ds.

# American Environmental Testing Company, Inc_ r-ZZ Sa uth Birch D rive


## • Spanish Fork, Ufiah 84 6 560 (801) 266-7111


# n

. 

## Co mpany: Date: 

# i.?- S- F 5; , **



## Source: ~y OC ~-s~•~~ 

## Calibrated By: ~ /7

~


## NOZZLE CALIBRAT1aN

Nozzie Di _ D2 D3 aD D average identfflcation

. (in. ) (in. ) (in. ) (in. ) Number 

# -4 f

~ .t x r 

# . 6.~A~' 0.~~~ o.00 

### ~ o.R~~ 

# 0B

~~ 

# dL p.2 

# p.2, 1 6 0. 0v 0...Z16

.~



# ~ 

# 43 ,Zr(o 6.Z./1P v.vc,c, v•z i6



## Where: Dl,2,3 = Nozzle d'rameter measured on a diiferent diameter, (in.). Tolerance -- measure within 0.001 inches (0.25 mm). ,6D = Maxim um difterence ln any two measurements, (in. ). Tolerance =0.004 Inches (0.1 mm). D average = AYerage oi Di, D2, D3.

~ ,'V)

### American Estvironmental Te3ting ComQany, Inc. 565 South 8irch Drive Spanish Fvric, Utah 84660

(801) 798-SSa3 (801) 260'-7111


### Meter 8ox Calibration Data Farm (Ezglish Units)

Date 

### Baremetric Pressure Meter 6ox Nurrtter 

### 9/19194 25.55 RAC #2824 

### Average Yi Averaqe AH Cali 

### rated 8v 

# _ Std. Meter Yi 

### 0.917 1.613 BAL 

# - GEJ 0.99497



### Orfica Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter aH113.6 Wet Test Meter Setting d-i (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) F13 (Tw) °F 

### Average Temp.
0.50 4.53 5 70 0.03676 69 68 1.00 4.62 

### 5 70 0.07353 69.5 69 1.50 9.101, 10 70 0.11029 69.5 69 200 8.942 

### 10' 68 0.14706 68.5 69 3.00 8.794 

### 10 69 0.2059 69 69 4.00 8.794 10 69 0.29412 69 69 Dry 

### Gas Meter Inlet 

# _ Outtet 

### Average Time ID (Td ij°F (Td o) 'F (Td) °F 

### Minutes Y aFi
69 73 74.50 9.95 0.9095 1.5669 73 83 .74 84 

### 81.25 7.117 0.9371 1.5251 77 90 75 87 

### 83.50 11.914 0.9255 1.6452 79 93 77

- 

### 91 86.75 10.067 0.9152 1.6067 81 98 82 99 9200 

### 8275 0.9052 1.6708 85 102 ' 86 102 95.00 7.167 0.9075 1.6621 88 104 

### Average Y Average aH 0.917 1.613



# aM- -•--• •-- -- -..,......._. - - -- - ...r-••1 •---- 

### 565 South Birch Drive Spaniah Fcrk, Utah 84660

(801) 7984553 (801) 250-7111


### Meter Bax Calibration Oata Form

Oate 

### (Englistt Units)

-- Rarametdc Pressure Meter 8ox Number 

### 9/29/94 25.62 RAC #145-569

Averace Yi Average 

# ~

_~_ Caiibrated Bv Std, Meter Yi 

### 0.998 1.748 BAL - GEJ o.99497



### Orfice Martometer Standard Meter Dry Gaa Meter Wet Test Meter aHJ13.6 Wet Test Meter SettEng aH (Vw) FI9 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) -F Average Temp. ;- 0.50 4.853 5 67 0.03676 67 67 1.00 4.802 5 67 0.07353 67 67 1.50 9.667 10 66 0.11029 66.5 67 2.00 9.637 10 60" 0.14706 66.5 67 3.00 9.594 10 67 0.22059 67 67 4.00 9.605 10 67 0.29412 67 67 Ory Gas Meter 

### Inlet

_ OuBet Average Time D (Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Y nH

71 - 92 8200 11.183 0.9918 1.6833 74 91 76 93 85.50 8.05 0.9863 1.7703 78 95

. 79 95 89.50 12.894 0.9996 1.6657 82 102 82 100 9325 11.517 1.0018 1.7708 85 106 `°:, 86 107 97.75 9.417 1.0016 1.7808 89 109 89 110 100.25 8.267 1.0044 1.8175 91 111 Average Yt Average aFl C.998 1.748



# ,-Z ~

### 50'S 5auth 81rc;t prtve Spanian rcrx, utacf 84scu (801) 798-a5o3 (301) 256-7111

~ 

### Meter 8ox Calibration Data Form (E.Zglish Units)

Oate Barornetric Pressur9

_ Merer Rex Nurrrber 9/19/94 . 25.71 Ca *(C97) 

### Average Yi _ Avrage d

_ Cafbrated 8v Std. Meter Y1 '1.C85 1.849 BAL • GcJ 0.99497



### Drfice Manameter Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter A}-f/13.6 Wet Test Meter Setdng aH

•. T 

### '(Wv) FCi

' 

### (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F

. 

### Average Temp.
0.50 5.4 5 60 0.03676 66 ' 60 

### 1.00 5.54 5 68 0.07353

. 66.5

~ 

### ,

, 1.50 10.95 10 67 0.11029 67

• 67

~ 

### 200 10.84 10 67.5 0.14706 67.75 68 

### 3.00 10.99 10 68.5 022C59 68.5 63.5 4.00 11.03 10 68.5 0.29412 68.5 68.5 

### Dry Gas Meter Cutlet Average Time fl (Td o) 'F (Td) °F Mirtutes Y 4!-t

67 67.50 1281 1.0761 1.8196 67 67 6825 929 1.1C29 1.8194 68

. 

### 68 68.75 14.91 , 1.0785 1.8345 68 • 

### 68 69.25 13.001 .1.0755 1.8607 

## 69 71 70.50 10.78 1.0883 1.8738 

## 71 72 71.50 9.4 1.0912 1.8824 

## 72 Average Yi Average aH 

## 1.065 1.849



## ~,~3

### 'A' Side Cailbr.don

Run Number P std P s

_ G-rt hi20 = H20

(inches H20) (tnches H20) 1 0.4 0.365 2 0.38 0.54 .3 0.4 0 ~ 

### Average:

'8' Stde Caiibralion


### Run Number P std P s

crtt H20 = Ei20 (nches H20) (inches H20) 1 0.36 0.51 2 0.35 0.49 3 0.35 0.49 Average: :

. , 

### Ca (S)

0.8402 0.8452 0.8452 

### Deviation

-0.00332 0.00160" 

### O.00t 6v Cp 

## (S)

0.8414 0.8389 0.837? Deviation

0.00208 -C.00046 -0.00162
O.3'393 565 Sauth 8irc:t Drive Spanish Fcric, Utah 8456a

(801) 798-3533 (801 ) 266-71 11


### P' t 

### tot T u 

### b C m

atbrati n For

Etot Tube Iderrtifitcattcn NumbRr- V. A.

_ lo u - g Calbrated By- RflB - ,1DS



### A a s Average 0.8414



### -~ 

## AVQvQ aauiti tyarrua ucive apaMQ.fi •••• ^, v

~ an a. , ~ •••. (801 ) 7984533 (8Cl ) 266-77 1 1


### Pitoi Tube CaGbrauon Fortrc

}P}tot Tube dentitteatfan Number so _ a 91619d
C:alih.rated_gw V88 - ,]DS


### 'A' Side CalIbration

Run Number P std P s CP Deviatton

. Cm H20 cm Fi20 (S)

. ' 1 (inC:les j•{20} OnCi'tes EI20) 0.35 0.5 0.8367 -0.00283 2

,. 0.35 0.49 0.8452 0.00So"o

3 0.35 0.5 0.8367 -0.00283
Average: 0.8395

~ 

### '8' Side Caiibratian

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation



### Grt H20 crrt H20 (S)

_ (fnc.'ies H24) (inches H20)

1 0,34 0,48 0.8416 -0.00476 2 0.34 0.47 0.8s05 0.00415 3 0.33 0.46 0.8470 0.00081

~ t Average: 0.8464

•
. .

A & 8 Average = .

0.8429 '

.. . , ~

~ ~~

### 'A' Side Calibratton
Run Number P std P s

__. crrt H20 cn H20



### (Inches Ff20) (lnc.';es 1420) 1 0.25 0.355 2 0.25 0.36 3 0.26 0.366 

### Average:

'8' Side Calibraticn
Run Number P std P s

Gn H20 cm H20 (inches H20) (in&.es H20) 1 0.25 0.355 2 0.25 0.353 3 0.36 Average: r •

., . . . . 

### CP 

### (S)

0.8392 0.8333 0.8440 Devfatfon

0.00034 -0.005s0 0.00516



### CP (S)

0.8392 0.8392 0.8416 Deviatfcn

-0.00081 -0. COC81 0.00163

0.3400 5co Soutts eirch Drive Sganisn t-vrx, utan S4bou

(801 ) 79845a3 (801) 256-7111


### Pitct Tube CalibratIon Fcrm

Oate* 9/619a.

__ ft• c t=. - - - - l■

1 ^

A 3 8 Average n 0.8394

~ 

## `7/ ~

### 5oa South 8irc;t Drive SQanish Foric, Utah 848o'a (801) 798-35a3 (80 Z) 28 0-711 l



### Pitot Tube Caiibration Fomt

Pitot TuEe dentificatiort Number 1 t• - A


### Zalibrated_B_v' JDS - RAL


### 'A• Stde Calibcation

Run Number P std p s Cp

crn H20 c:rt Ef20 (S) (inc.es H20) rna.'tes H20) ` 1 0. 36 0.51 0.8402 2 0.38 0.54 0.8388 3 0.37 0.52 0.8435

Average: 0.8409

'8' S+de Calibration

Run Number P std P s Cp = H20 c:rt H20 (S) 

### (nches H20) (Irt&,es Fi20) 1 0.4 OS 0.8377 2 0.38 0.54 0.8389 3 0.4 0.505 0.8414
Average: 0.8393

~ 

### A& B Average s 0.8401

• •- ~ : pate , 9/6/9a



### Deviatfon

-0.c0a6s -0.00198 0.00267



### DeviaBon

~

-0.00162 -0.CC046 0. CC208



## ~ 

# ,qq568 South 

### Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 798-M3 (801 ) 266-71 1 1 

### Stack Temperature Sensor Calibration Form

Thermocouole Num6er. st1 

### Dieital -tt 2 

### Omeca Date: 916194

Caiibrated Bv: JDS

- 

### RPH Barornetric Pressure: Reference: ERTCO 25.73

- 

### Mg

- 

### Giass



### Reference Point Source a Reference Thermor.ouple Temperature Number (specifir) Thennometer Potentiometer Difference b Temperature 

### °F Temperature 

### °F % ° 

### a) Ice Water 43 44 -0.32

#1 b) Hot H20 158 159 -C.23 Digital c) Boiiing H20 211 212 -0.21

d) Warrn Oil 230 227 0.60 e) Hot Oil 331 330 0.17 

# n Boiling Oii 355 356 -0.16 a) Ice Water 44 45 -0.32 #2 b) Hot H20 155 156 -o.23 Omega c) Boiling H20 209 221 -249

d) Warm Oil 238 238 0.00 e) Hot Oii 331 333 -0.33 f) Boiling Oii 378 379 -0.15

a Type of calibration system used. b(reference temp. °C + 273) -(test thermometer temp. °C + 273) ' 100< 1.5%

reference temperature °C + 273./....r..—aill =JlrA.v...IdQ.iaaA JC.7a ... 7

~ _•••r
~ ..' ...v. 

### 565 South Birch Drive SQanish Forit, Utah 84660

(801) 798-85a3 (801) 266-7111

Baiartee Cailbratlon Data Forra



### 9alance Name: nhaus GA - 200 S2 fAnalvticall Number - 1292 

# ' -.. - -.. = u=

~~ 

# = -- •

~ 

# •

~ 

# .. .-.-► u . ~ 

# _ ~ 

# .:::

Classification of S 

### t anda 

### r d •.

~ •W.S.S. . t - 1D


### A 200 S Chaus GA - 200 S2

' Date 0,5009 1.0000 q 10.0000 g 50.0000 a 100.0000 q 3/2/94 0.500 1.0001 10.0001 50.0002 100.0002 9/6/94 0.500 1.0000 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001

U 3600 Metder - BB - 3000

Date 0.500 g 1.D000 g 10.0000 g 50.0000 g 100.0000 Q 3/2194 0.5 1.0 10.0 50.1 100.1 916194 0.5010 1.0001 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000



# O.nqc:IvlrvnmenLaJ l esijny %.•jlilpany, u:c. 

### 665 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801 ) 266-7111 

### Sample Box Temperature Sensar Calibration Form

gamole Box Number. CR#1 A- UT #t A- RAC 91 

### A-RAC it2A Date* 9/6194 Barometric Pressurre , 25.71 

### r,aiibrated By- RPH

- 

### R9B Reference: ERTCO

- 

### 105

- 

### SNRS



### Reference Point Source a Reference Thermocoupie Temperature Number (specify) Themiometer Poterttiometer Difference b Temperature °F Temperature °F 9'e 

# =

3 Oven On 255 257 -0.38

CR 4 Oven On 263 261 0.37 #1 A 2 Oven On 150 150 0.00

1 Cald H20 47 46 

### 0.31 8 Oven On 70 71 -0.29 7 Oven On 73 73 0.00
3 Oven On 247 249 -0.38 UTA 4 Overt On 252 253 -0.19 #1 A 2 Oven On 148 149 -0.24

1 Cofd H20 46 47 -0.31 8 Oven On 80 81 -0.28 7 Oven Ort 79 79 0.00
3 Oven On 266 264 0.37 RAC 4 Oven On 247 247 0.00 #1 A 2 Oven On 145 146 -0.24

1 Coid H20 49 50 -0.31 8 Oven On 83 83 O.CO 7 Oven On 81 82 -0.28

3 Oven On 236 238 -0.39 RAC 4 Oven On 248 250 -0.38 ft2A 2 Oven On 162 160 0.46

1 

# _ Ccld H20 45 46 

### -0.31 8 Oven On 80 82 

### -0.57 7 Oven On 81 80 0.28

a Type of calibration system used. b(reference temp. °C + 273) -(test thermometer temp. °C + 273) • 100< 1.5°/,

reference temperature °C + 273

## -........_

~ 

## .. .-.....

~ 

## .....a

~ 

## aa ......... ~ 

## - - -r_..

~ 

## ..._. 565 Scuth Birch Drive Spanish Forlc, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111


### Balanca Calibrration Data Form

8alance Name- Satorius - A 200 S fAnalvticall Number * 35120053

. . ~ 

### • r ..

. -

. ~ . - f [ 

### *
Slaeeification_ of Standard Weiqrts. Jvoe 'S' W.B.S. Anafvst BAL - DFH



### A 2C0 S

- Date 0.500 g 1.0000 g _ 10.0000 GL 50.0000 g 100.0000 g 3/2J94 0.500 0.9999 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 9/6/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000

U 3600

Date 0.500 a 1.0000 a 10,0000 g 50.0000 g 1 00.0000 g, 3J2/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.1000 9/6194 0.501 1.0010 10.0000 50.0001 100.0001



## 0

n St"1

### American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Forit, Utah 84660

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111
POSTTEST DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM

(English Units)

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number Ptant 1219/94 25.51 CR(097) ISB West Jordan, Utah Calibrated Bv Pretest Yi Averaqe Yi Low SQan High Soan VBB

- 

### DFH 1.085 1.075 1.031 1.139

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter aH/13.6 Wet Test Meter Setting ol-I (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp.
2.00 10.839 10.005 67 0.14706 67 67 2.00 10.841 10.07 68 0.14706 68 68 2.00 10.85 10.012 69 0.14706 69 69

Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average Time ID 

### (Td. i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Y

67 68 67.50 11.518 1.078 67 68 67 69 68.25 11.509 1.071 68 69 • 68 69 68.50 11.511 1.076 68 69 Average Y
1.075

- :.Post Test Temperaturs Check

Date: 12/9/94 Reference: ERTCO Hg Thermometer
Meter Bo. CR #1(097) Sample Box: CR #1 A

Meter Box Reference Meter In: 69 69 Meter Out: 69 81 Samole Box Reference impinger In: 204 200 Impinger Out: 48 49 Oven: 245 246American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660

(801) 7984553 (801) 266-7111

POSTTEST DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM

(Engiish Units)

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number Plant 12l9194 25.51 RAC #145-569 IS8 West Jordan, Utah Calibrated Bv Pretest Yi Averaqe Yi Low Soan High Soan VBB

- DFH 0.998 1.011 0.945 ' 1.048

Orfice Manometer Wet Test Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter AW13.6 Wet Test Meter Setdng al-1 (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp.

2.00 10.06 9.963 67 0.14706 67 67 200 10.12 10.017 68 0.14706 68 68 2.00 10.11 9.986 69 0.14706 69 69

Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 (Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Y

67 68 68.25 11.511 1.006 69 69 71 70 71.25 11.506 1.011 73 • 71 75 72 74.25 11.522 1.017 77 73 Average Y

1.011

Post Test Temperature Check

Date: 1219/54 Reference: EATCO Hg Thermometer

Meter Box: RAC #145-569 Sample Box: RAC #1 A

Meter In: Meter Box Reference Samole Box Impinger In: 201 Reference 77 79 191 Meter Out: 72 74 Impinger Out: 47 47 Oven: 237 241


# aoAmerican Environmentai Testing Company, Inc. 565 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utah 84660

(801) 798-85S3 (801) 266-7111

POSTTEST DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM

(Engiish Units)


### Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number Plant 1219/94 25.51 RAC #2824 ISB 

### West Jordan, Utah Calibrated Bv Pretest Yi Averaqe Yi Low SBan High Soan VBB - DFH 0.998 1.010 0.948 1.048

Orfice Manometer Wet Test Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter eW13.6 Wet Test Meter Setting ol-I (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Aver3ge Temp.

2.00 10.08 9.98 67 0.14706 67 67 2.00 10.01 10.011 68 0.14706 68 68 2.00 10.1 9.973 69 0.14706 69 69

Dry Gas Meter 

### Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 (Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Y

68 68 69.00 10.052 1.008 71 69 74 70 72.75 10.069 1.003 76 71 79 72 76.00 10.077 1.020 81 72 Average Yi

1.010



### - Post Test Temperature Checlt
Date: 12/9/94 Reference: ERTCO Hg Thermometer
Meter Box: RAC #2824 Sampie Box: RAC #2A

Meter In: Meter Box Reference Samole Box Impinger In: 205 Reference 78 80 197 Meter Out: 73 73 Impinger Out: 49 49 Oven: 240 245



# ~~.0 ~ ~ _ '~ =:2F

~ `

.. J..

~ 1:+cVi=. ~ ~.~?

l::c•7:.:G

~ ..:G

~ i-.t°a:•,c

~ .::c

~ .vi...C

~ .c:ti•-ci.•-_.:

~ ._;.•.c

. ~ .a-a..c:..

~ •a..z ' ..,. ~



### SPECIALTY GAS DIVISION l 11711 S. Alameda Stroet ~ Los Angeles. C.a 90059 (213) 564-5711 i 

# -- - `

- ANALYTICAL REPORT - PRO

~ 

# UCT CERTIF

~ 

# CATiON ~

. . . . . '•

. .. . . f T~~ 

### „Mouatain Airgas -.• DATE. 31 Jan 1994 +6

~ . . ~w~ " ,2.y:. . .:' ~ y

. • . ~ . ; • • • •. + .• , . . • ~ i- _ ~ ~~ -:... . ~ ::.r: ~ .~ ::: ...

~ •- ..
~~ . -" .- P .O: • NO: _ 00542 2. _ --

-„-- ~
, •

. . .. • •

. . _.a•

. ~ . '

. . . . . . ~ • •

. •
. 

## 'EPA Protocol Procedure G-1: • ~ 

## -

CYLiNOEFt NO : CONST(TUEivTS CONCSIVTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL 

# ~

';.:' :• ~ t

. : . . 

### CC10#484 ~ 

### Sulfur 'Dioside 500 P?M 514.6 PPM ' . ~ 

### .'' • • Nitrogen Balance Balance

.,. . =. • • .

.

. r

.. . . .. • .; . •

. . . • , ~- ~

'.. • ~ •~' ~ . .. :' , j 

## CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 36 EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1997 Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig =Da•not use

-- below•'150 psig '" ` ' •

.0%



### William L. •Vernon ANALYST

,• .i' ~'~:. ~ ~

~ • 7!y' • ` .

~~ N
~ -••- t ~ Z •)/q.1


### m ,. b

## ION Amqi!eS.:ZA 90059 

# ANALYTICAL 

# RgPORT

- PRODUCT 

# CER

- TIFICATiON

W, 3 1 

## "'Jaz 199 1 4 TO: Mountain Airgas

..

EPA 

## Proto

~ 

## :ol •



### Procedure G - 1

CYLINDER NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATiON: NOMINAL ACTUAL

, 

### CC10514 sulfur 

## Di;xide. aso PPM 

### 901.6 PPM



### Nitrogen Balance 

# j B'alance



## CERTIFICAtION PEZOD'(months): 36 

### EXPIRATION DATE: 

### January 31, 1997 

## Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig Do not use-below 130 pA 

## i



# T

r n _2 :74

r jr

AD 

## ANALYSr Oiiiiam L. 

## tainc

i t.

# ~~-' c ~~ SPECIALTY GAS DIVISION 11 711 S. 

### Alameda Street Los AngelOS. CA 90059 (21:3) 564•2

- 711 

# ANALYTICAL REPORT PROOUCT CERTIFICATION TO: Mountain Airgas DATE: 31 

## J " an 199 

## 4

EPA 

## Pr6tocol Procedure 0-1



### CYLINCER NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATICN: NCMINAL ACTUAL 

## ••,.CC3775 

## Sulfur Dioxide 150 

## PPM 163. 

# 5 PPX Nitrogen.' 

## Balance a * nce

CERTIFZCZLTION PE".1101D (Mcaths):- 24 EXPIRATION DATE: 

## January 31, 1996 

## •cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig Do 

## ndt use 

## below 150 ps g

Xt.



### 4/ 

## William L. Vernon ANALYST

### . . ~ 

### . . ~ 

### . _ .. :

~ 

### .: . • .

•

~ 

### ..'

. . •• •• ' • ~ 

### • • , . .. ~ ~- 

### • - ' .-..:.;

~ 

### ' :

~ 

### .::; •

~ 

### :

. .. . .. ~ 

### r

_

~ 

### :.:. ~ 

### -

. '

.... . ....- . . . . •

. . . . •
~ .. ....-.

~ C... : • _LY... ...r ..

. 1i

... . i

. ..

. •

. . . . _ ~ -rn:

~~ . . , •

. .. •.

. .. . . . , . . . , ~ .. .. ~ ......._........ ««. a.•'...

. '

. •

.. . .. . . ~

. •
. . ~ ' . _.. ~ - . .i.

..... ~ ~ i ._

.

~ • '

. . . . . .. ~ •
.. . .. .. ~ . . . • • • ~' ~

, . : ~ . •1i

~ :y.

~ . ' e . :

.. ~ : ^ -` Mla

~ ; 4~ = • •

.
• - (. .. . ... . . ~ . ..v
~ ... _^a• ~Il`~w:~-~



## . , • •



## William L. Vernon -- ~ 

## .~ _ ~ 

# = •~~ v,

I~ ~y

i 

## ~ 

## ~

~ rr1

~ yl



# ;..

~~ 

# -.•: @0 0 =@Zz SPBOIALTY GAS DIY1SiON► 

### I , t 1 T1 Alameda Street Los V.S. n geies, CA 90059 1213) 564-5711

~ 

# ANALYTiCAL REPORT - PROOUCT CERTIFICATION
TO:

- Mountaia Airqas DATE: 3 Jan 1994

•~ ,.r. ~ ~ ~ ..-• a ..!-.,r- - — , - • " ~"'~ .

- 

### 0 : -N0 i '00 -

~ 

### .-- . _ .. ..._ .

. .


## EPA Protocol Procedure 0-1. - 1

CYLINDEA NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCcNTRATiON: NOMINAL ACTUAL 

## 150-810 Sulfur Dioxi de 250 PPM 260.7 PPM

Nitrogen B-alance Balance

CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 24 -EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1996 

## Cylinder Pressure: - 2000 psig - •-_ .__

~ 

## . . _... -; —

~ 

## ------- - Do not us e below 150 psig ~

~~ 

### .



### -L.:*; W •u93
I ~ i ~

### ~ 

# oG

~ 

# a. • ~ ~ (/~, 

## SPECIALTY

- GAS DIVISION 11711 

### . S. 

### Alameda i

stmet L03 Angeles. CA 90059

564-ST11 

# ANALYTlCAL REPORT 

# PRODUCT CEFITIFICATION TO: Mountain Airgas DATE: 31 

### Jan 1994

EPA 

## Protocol Procedure G 

### - 1



### CYLINDER NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL


### Nitric Oxide 250 

### ppm 251.1 PPM 

### NOX 259.6 

### PPM Nitrogen Balance Balance



### CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 24 EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1996

-- 

## Cylinder Pressure: 2000 paig Do 

## not below 150.-psi4

-107 J



## williaM L. vernon

72 rt"ja,"j I C,;; I

dt 

### V GAS OfISICN Aiamoda Street A 

### ng Gies. CA

9005 9 (213 ~ 56A.5711 1 . _. p e.



# 'ou IFICATION ]CAL- 

## R., 

# P ',-'o U

TO: 

## tAn- Airga DATE::.:-' - - 3i A 

## Jan .1-994

.~ . •

~ . . a. '

.. - ~~ . .. _ ~ . . . • ~ `; • " . ~ ., - . . . • . . . . . . • .-•• c

~ - ~ l ~



### EPA 

## Protoc*l Procedure. G-1



## CYLINDER NC. CONSTITUENTS CCNCENTRATICN• 

### NOMINAL 

## ACTUAL

Nitric Oxide 

### CC10512 150 PPM 

## 159. •: PPM



## NOX 159.9 

## PPM Nitrolgen Balance Bal ance

. 

### •-..CERTIFICATION 

## PERIOD (months) 24 EXPIRATION DATE: 

### January 31, 1996 

## Cylinder Pressure: - 

## 2000 psig Do 

## not use below 150 , 

## psig

.4

Z 

### !

i~ jl / // / / . . . . •



## llilliam L. w ANALYST



## ernon

W . 

# m .0

f