alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

November 20, 2020

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal Nos. 2019-1852, 2019-2323

WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES, LTD., A 

CANADIAN CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RICHARD ALLESHOUSE, AN INDIVIDUAL, YONG 

YEH, AN INDIVIDUAL, PACIFIC SURF DESIGNS, 

INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellants

Decided: November 19, 2020

Precedential Opinion

______________________

Please make the following change:

On page 9, line 25, “On appeal, the parties accept” is 

changed to “The parties now accept”

Case: 19-1852 Document: 66 Page: 1 Filed: 11/20/2020
EXHIBIT 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|March 10, 2005 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                                     
|-------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|               | Marc N. Teal                                         
|               | (Principal Financial Officer), BCTC IV Assignor Corp.
|               |
§ 302-16.200 What governing policies must we establish for MEA? For MEAs, you must establish policies and procedures governing: ( a ) Who will determine whether payment for an amount in excess of the flat MEA is appropriate; and
( b ) How you will pay a MEA in accordance with §§ 302-16.3 and 302-16.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 27, 1999 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 27, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                          20,178
<SECURITIES>                                     1,355
<RECEIVABLES>                                      130
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,840
<PP&E>                                          28,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,310)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,892
<SALES>                                         16,322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,322
<CGS>                                            4,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (48)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    657
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (263)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                657
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       394
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
Williams . Rene e (OST ) pcCk ^ ^r-ZlST-Z^^f-^^ / Subject : FW : CZ N critica l servic e ' . : : - - ; From : Akgrinde@aol.co m [mailto:Akgrinde@aol.com ] Sent : Saturday , Apri l 03 , 201 0 9:4 6 A M To : Little , Cynthi a M (DOT ) Subject : CZ N critica l servic e Cindie , I a m writin g i n supporto fmaintainin g critica l ai rservic e fo rChisana . Altlioug h ther e i s a relativel ysmal l yea rroun d population , thos e peopl e depen d heavil yo n ai rservices . Additional , man yseasona l propert yowne rparttim e resident s depen d o n thes e services . I ow n a cabi n i n Chisan a an d woul d b e directl yimpacte d i fther e wa s a reductio n i n services . Than k yo u fo ryou rconsideration . Regard s Dav e Grind e P O Bo x77170 2 Eagl e Rive r Alask a (907 ) 688-808 8
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4412

To require the head of any Federal agency to differentiate between fats,

oils, and greases of animal, marine, or vegetable origin, and other oils

and greases, in issuing certain regulations, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1994

Ms. LONG (for herself, Mr. EWING, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. ROWLAND, Mr. SKELTON, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. MONTGOMERY, and Mr. EMERSON) introduced

the following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Agriculture and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To require the head of any Federal agency to differentiate

between fats, oils, and greases of animal, marine, or

vegetable origin, and other oils and greases, in issuing

certain regulations, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DIFFERENTIATION AMONG FATS, OILS, AND

4 GREASES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In issuing any regulation or es6 tablishing any interpretation or guideline relating to a fat,
2

•HR 4412 IH

1 oil, or grease under any Federal law, the head of any Fed2 eral agency shall differentiate between—

3 (1)(A) animal fats and oils and greases, and

4 fish and marine mammal oils, within the meaning of

5 paragraph (2) of section 61(a) of title 13, United

6 States Code; or

7 (B) oils of vegetable origin, including oils from

8 the seeds, nuts, and kernels referred to in paragraph

9 (1)(A) of such section; and

10 (2) other oils and greases, including petroleum.

11 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—In differentiating between

12 the class of fats, oils, and greases described in subsection

13 (a)(1) and the class of oils and greases described in sub14 section (a)(2), the head of the Federal agency shall con15 sider differences in the physical, chemical, biological, and

16 other properties, and in the environmental effects, of the

17 classes.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40341

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANASTACIO NERIO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-1447-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Anastacio Nerio has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Nerio has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed 

to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Nerio’s claims of ineffective assistance 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 24, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40341 Document: 00513731144 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2016
No. 16-40341

2

of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Nerio’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Nerio’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is 

DENIED.

 Case: 16-40341 Document: 00513731144 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2016
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD VINCENT LETIZIA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D21-2720 & 4D21-2975

[March 24, 2022]

Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.850 motion and denying 

rule 3.801 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

312005CF002028A and 312005CF001527A.

Richard Vincent Letizia, Orlando, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 22 2005

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

EARL WATSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF MUSKOGEE, a

subordinate political entity in the State

of Oklahoma; CLIFF SINYARD,

former Sheriff of Muskogee County,

in his official capacity; SHIRLEY

SHORES, in her individual and

official capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-7013

(D.C. No. CV-03-297-WH)

(E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BRISCOE , ANDERSON , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral
-2-

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument. 

Plaintiff Earl Watson appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’

motions for summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim alleging that

defendants delayed in providing him proper medical care for an eye injury while

he was incarcerated at the Muskogee County Jail. Mr. Watson argues that the

district court erred in granting summary judgment because 1) there was evidence

of deliberate indifference on the part of the County; 2) Mr. Sinyard’s knowledge

could be inferred, he failed to supervise jail personnel, and there was a lack of

policy concerning medical requests at the time of the incident; and 3) Ms. Shores

was personally involved in the circumstances that resulted in the loss of Mr.

Watson’s eye. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo ,

applying the same standard as the district court. Simms v. Okla. ex. rel. Dep’t of

Mental Health & Substance Abuse Servs. , 165 F.3d 1321, 1326 (10th Cir. 1999).

Having reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law, we conclude

that the district court correctly decided this case. We therefore AFFIRM the
-3-

judgment for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its

Order filed January 5, 2004.

Entered for the Court

Michael R. Murphy 

Circuit Judge
| Exhibit      32.2 | Section      1350 Certification |
|-------------------|---------------------------------|

|   | 1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the  Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March      12, 2010 |   /s/ Craig A.    Steen        |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                | Craig      A. Steen                      |
|                | Interim      Principal AccountingOfficer |

----
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Electronic Filing Procedures

CLERK’S OFFICE

April 2023– Version 3.2.2 Page 25 

J. Receiving Notifications for Cases of Interest

Once you have been approved for access, follow these steps to receive 

online notifications of docketing activity. While it is free to receive these 

email notifications, PACER will charge a fee per page for accessing any 

documents. Please refer to the Electronic Public Access Fee Schedule for 

electronic access fee rates.

1. Go to http://ecf.cafc.uscourts.gov, select CM/ECF Document Filing 

System. 

2. Log on using your PACER credentials. 
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Electronic Filing Procedures

CLERK’S OFFICE

April 2023– Version 3.2.2 Page 26 

3. Under Utilities, select Notice for Cases of Interest. 

4. Notifications for each case will go to your PACER email account, 

which is automatically filled in at the top of this page. 

5. Select your desired frequency of notification. Then type in the desired 

case number and click Add. There is no limit to the number of cases 

you may add. 

6. When you have finished adding cases click Save to finalize your 

choices. 

Note: While there is no limit to the number of cases for which you may 

receive notifications, accessing documents through PACER may accrue a 

fee. See Electronic Public Access Fee Schedule.

7. To stop receiving notifications in a case, click the red “X” next to a

case.
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period June 30, 2005
(the "Report"), Joey Schwartz Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1). To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



DATE: AUGUST 12, 2005


/S/ JOEY SCHWARTZ
--------------------
JOEY SCHWARTZ
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41124-41125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16717]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Debt Management Advisory Committee Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. app. 10(a)(2), that a 
meeting will be held at the U.S. Treasury Department, 15th and 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, on August 1, 2000, of the 
following debt management advisory committee: the Bond Market 
Association, Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee.

[[Page 41125]]

    The agenda for the meeting provides for a technical background 
briefing by Treasury staff, followed by a charge by the Secretary of 
the Treasury or his designate that the Committee discuss particular 
issues, and a working session. Following the working session, the 
Committee will present a written report of its recommendations.
    The background briefing by Treasury staff will be held at 9:00 a.m. 
Eastern time and will be opened to the public. The remaining sessions 
and the committee's reporting session will be closed to the public, 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. app. 10(d).
    This notice shall constitute my determination, pursuant to the 
authority placed in heads of departments by 5 U.S.C. app. 10(d) and 
vested in me by Treasury Department Order No. 101-05, that the closed 
portions of the meeting are concerned with information that is exempt 
from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(A). The public interest 
requires that such meetings be closed to the public because the 
Treasury Department requires frank and full advice from representatives 
of the financial community prior to making its final decision on major 
financing operations. Historically, this advice has been offered by 
debt management advisory committees established by the several major 
segments of the financial community. When so utilized, such a committee 
is recognized to be an advisory committee under 5 U.S.C. app. 3.
    Although the Treasury's final announcement of financing plans may 
not reflect the recommendations provided in reports of the advisory 
committee, premature disclosure of the committee's deliberations and 
reports would be likely to lead to significant financial speculation in 
the securities market. Thus, these meetings fall within the exemption 
covered by 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(A).
    The Office of Financial Markets is responsible for maintaining 
records of debt management advisory committee meetings and for 
providing annual reports setting forth a summary of committee 
activities and such other matters as may be informative to the public 
consistent with the policy of 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: June 26, 2000.
Lee Sachs,
Assistant Secretary, Financial Markets.
[FR Doc. 00-16717 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
Exhibit 10.42





Via Facsimile and Federal Express



October 21, 2002



Mr. Richard Musci
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
The Schwab Building
101 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA  94104



Re:	Marketing Agreement dated April 25, 2000 between E-LOAN, Inc. and
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. ("Marketing Agreement")



Dear Richard:

Following up on our recent discussions, please consider this letter to serve
as notice of termination of the Marketing Agreement. As Section XI of the
Agreement provides, termination will become effective no later than November 20,
2002.



Very truly yours,







Joseph Kennedy



JK:tj

cc: Christopher D. Dodds (per the notice provisions of the contract)

---
*&#*&/&J^y /fur***/e?6> s?o/£

/Yc?# Y?#

Jo^o A/L^-ff/if

/&**«'f*AsfS /+. - fr/* £

//*//&.<** flfetif'.

f*s At- **'?-/</ *'• /4/~ +*/*- /¥

>*/£s >/&* *Z&?~<

i/fcr

drl/Zo-^7 JtSfe^S o^t/riS iCs/-)

a.

AZw*/*&K -A./sx^J?

r

RECEIVED IN

COUHI Oh CRIMINAL APPEATS"

AUG 28 2015

AbetAcosta,Cleri< > r
§ 0.371 Authority delegated. The Director, Office of Communications Business Opportunities, or his/her designee, is hereby delegated authority to: ( a ) Manage the Commission's compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act;
( b ) Develop the Commission's goals and objectives regarding increased opportunities for small entities, women, and minorities;
( c ) Collect and analyze data on the Commission's efforts toward ensuring full consideration of the interests of small entities, women, and minorities;
( d ) Prepare and release reports on the opportunities available and obstacles faced by small entities, women, and minorities in the communications industry;
( e ) Conduct studies and collect data on the issues and problems faced by small entities, women, and minorities in the communications industry;
( f ) Assume representational role on behalf of the Commission before other federal agencies and at conferences, meetings, and hearings regarding small entities, women, and minorities in the communications industry;
( g ) Develop programs and strategies designed to increase competition, employment opportunities and diversity of viewpoint through the promotion of ownership by small entities, women, and minorities;
( h ) Manage the Commission's efforts to increase the awareness of small entities, women, and minorities and to ensure that all available information is accessible to the same.
[69 FR 7377, Feb. 17, 2003]