alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-1166: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PyKAanqhPJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-18-2022-21-1166-raytheon-technologies-v-general-electric-company-rule-36-judgment-21-1166-rule_36_judgment-1-18-2022_1893824\/\">21-1166: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-18-2022-21-1166-raytheon-technologies-v-general-electric-company-rule-36-judgment-21-1166-rule_36_judgment-1-18-2022_1893824\/embed\/#?secret=PyKAanqhPJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-1166: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"PyKAanqhPJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"RULE 36 JUDGMENT Posted: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY [RULE 36 JUDGMENT](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-1166 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
No. 11-9236.

#### Creswell *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Order entered August 2, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00261
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.B. AND E.B., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Cour t

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 53861
- 2020

O RDER In response to our July 20, 2021 order directing him to file written verification he has paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, appellant has filed a statement of inab ility to pay costs. The Collin County District Clerk’s online docket reflects appellant also filed a statement of inability to pay with the trial court clerk. Accordingly, pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145, we ORDER Janet Dugger, Official Cou rt Reporter for the 296 th Judicial District Court, to file the record without payment of costs no later than September 1, 2021

. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145.We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms.

Dugger and the parties. /s/ KE N MOLBERG JUSTICE
Exhibit (32)

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with
this quarterly report of American Greetings Corporation on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), each of the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American Greetings Corporation.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|January 6, 2010                                      
|                                                     
|/s/ Zev Weiss                                        
|Zev Weiss                                            
|Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
|                                                     
|/s/ Stephen J. Smith                                 
|Stephen J. Smith                                     
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    
|(principal financial officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Christine Flores Desio d/b/a Professional 

Center of Grand Prairie and Francis 

Anthony Desio, Jr. a/k/a Frank Desio, 

Individually, 

 

 Appellants,

v.

Mike Del Bosque d/b/a Injury and Rehab 

Center in Grand Prairie,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00212-CV

Appeal from the

14th District Court

of Dallas County, Texas 

(TC# DC-17-04408)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s motion to transfer the above numbered cause to the 

Fifth Court of Appeals. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.425 Commission action.

The Commission will consider all relevant comments and material of record before taking final action in a rulemaking proceeding and will issue a decision incorporating its finding and a brief statement of the reasons therefor.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated February 14, 2017, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-215134) of Smart Trust 296,
comprising Smart Trust, Strategic Growth & Income Trust, Series 11.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


February 14, 2017
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

I, Anne Brennan, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Openwave Systems Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) forthe registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: July 7, 2008
#### § 101.819 Stations affected by coordination contour procedures.

In frequency bands shared with the communication-satellite service, applicants must also comply with the requirements of § 101.21.
No. 10-11192.

#### Dugmore *v.*Lattimore, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.735 Conduct of proceedings. ( a ) The Commission may issue such orders and conduct its proceedings as will best conduce to the proper dispatch of business and the ends of justice.
( b ) The Commission may decide each complaint upon the filings and information before it, may request additional information from the parties, and may require one or more informal meetings with the parties to clarify the issues or to consider settlement of the dispute.
[83 FR 44832, Sept. 4, 2018]
No. 11-777.

#### Robbins *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certio-rari denied.
For more information visit: 

### www.cleanwaterNJ.org 

# Protecting the

Environment The New Jersey Department of Environmental Pr otection’s

Best Management Practices for Amalgam Waste 

## DON’T

DON’T use bulk elemental mercury.

DON’T rinse traps or vacuum pump filters over

drains or in the sinks.

DON’T throw or place the disposable trap, sludge from reusable trap, or vacuum pump filter or contents with regular garbage.

DON’T throw or place the disposable trap, sludge from reusable trap, or vacuum pump filter or contents into sharps containers or biohazard bag.

DON’T flush amalgam waste down the drain.

DON’T use cleaners with bleach or chlorine to clean vacuum system lines.



## DO

DO use mercury-free material, when appropriate.

DO recycle all amalgam waste containing mercury. Store amalgam waste in airtight containers.

DO use precapsulated alloys. Recycle used disposable capsules containing mercury.

DO disinfect and store amalgam pieces from removal and restoration with amalgam waste.

DO install chair-side traps in each cuspidor and filters in the vacuum system of every operatory

where restoration work is done.

DO change and clean chair-side traps and vacuum

filters.

DO have a licensed recycling contractor, mail-in

service or hazardous waste hauler remove amalgam waste.

Printed on recycled paper
1128 

1129 

1130 

1131 

1132 

1133 

1134 

1135 

1136 

1137 

1138 

1139 

1140 

1141 

1142 

1143 

1144 

1145 

1146 

1147 

1148 

1149 

1150 

1151 

1152 

1153 

1154 

1155 

1156 

1157 

1158 

1159 

1160 

1161 

1162 

1163 

1164 

1165 

1166 

1167 

1168 

1169 

1170 

1171 

1172 

1173 

1174 

1175 

1176 

1177 

1178 

1179 

1180 

1181 

1182 

1183 

1184 

1185 

1186 

1187 

1188 

1189 

1190 

1191 

1192 

1193 

1194 

1195 

1196 

1197 

1198 

1199 

1200 

1201 

1202 

1203 

1204 

1205 

1206 

1207 

1208 

1209 

1210 

1211 

1212 

1213 

1214 

1215 

1216 

1217 

1218 

1219 

1220 

1221 

1222 

1223 

1224 

1225 

1226 

1227 

1228 

1229 

1230 

1231 

1232 

1233 

1234 

1235 

1236 

1237 

1238 

1239 

1240 

1241 

1242 

1243 

1244 

1245 

1246 

1247 

1248 

1249 

1250 

1251 

1252 

1253 

1254 

1255 

1256 

1257 

1258 

1259 

1260 

1261 

1262 

1263 

1264 

1265 

1266 

1267 

1268 

1269 

1270 

1271 

1272 

1273 

1274 

1275 

1276 

1277 

1278 

1279 

1280 

1281 

1282 

1283 

1284 

1285 

1286 

1287 

1288 

1289 

1290 

1291 

1292 

1293 

1294 

1295 

1296 

1297 

1298 

1299 

1300 

1301 

1302 

1303 

1304 

1305 

1306 

1307 

1308 

1309 

1310 

1311 

1312 

1313 

1314 

1315 

1316 

1317 

1318 

1319 

1320 

1321 

1322 

1323 

1324 

1325 

1326 

1327 

1328 

1329 

1330 

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:23:54-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1701 Purpose.

To provide electronic filing of applications, notifications, registration statements, reports, and related documents in the Multichannel Video and Cable Television Services and the Cable Television Relay Services.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.17 Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. ( a ) In any investigatory or adjudicatory matter within the Commission's jurisdiction (including, but not limited to, any informal adjudication or informal investigation but excluding any declaratory ruling proceeding) and in any proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments (with respect to expressions of interest) or any tariff proceeding, no person subject to this rule shall; ( 1 ) In any written or oral statement of fact, intentionally provide material factual information that is incorrect or intentionally omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading; and
( 2 ) In any written statement of fact, provide material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading without a reasonable basis for believing that any such material factual statement is correct and not misleading.
( b ) For purpose of paragraph (a) of this section, “persons subject to this rule” shall mean the following: ( 1 ) Any applicant for any Commission authorization;
( 2 ) Any holder of any Commission authorization, whether by application or by blanket authorization or other rule;
( 3 ) Any person performing without Commission authorization an activity that requires Commission authorization;
( 4 ) Any person that has received a citation or a letter of inquiry from the Commission or its staff, or is otherwise the subject of a Commission or staff investigation, including an informal investigation;
( 5 ) In a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, any person filing an expression of interest; and
( 6 ) To the extent not already covered in this paragraph (b), any cable operator or common carrier.
[68 FR 15098, Mar. 28, 2003]
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/18 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements at September 30, 1999 (unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (79)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,288
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,454
<PP&E>                                           1,189
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (487)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,249
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               65
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,319
<SALES>                                          7,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,858
<CGS>                                            6,108
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  95
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    141
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                122
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       122
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02



</TABLE>
404 A.2d 1349

#### Commonwealth v. Gerald R. Williams, Appellant.

Submitted June 12, 1978.

Jeffrey P. Bowe, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Richard B. Russell, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

JACOBS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2420]

Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification have been filed in the Commission's rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by July 20, 2000. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

*Subject:*                     Amendment of Rules and Policies Governing Pole Attachments (CS Docket No. 97-98).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     5.                

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16822 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
#### § 50-204.10 Occupational noise exposure.

(a) Protection against the effects of noise exposure shall be provided when the sound levels exceed those shown in Table I of this section when measured on the A scale of a standard sound level meter at slow response. When noise levels are determined by octave band analysis, the equivalent A-weighted sound level may be determined as follows:

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC21OC91.015/EC21OC91.015_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC21OC91.015/EC21OC91.015_original_size.png)

Equivalent sound level contours. Octave band sound pressure levels may be converted to the equivalent A-weighted sound level by plotting them on this graph and noting the A-weighted sound level corresponding to the point of highest penetration into the sound level contours. This equivalent A-weighted sound level, which may differ from the actual A-weighted sound level of the noise, is used to determine exposure limits from Table I.

(b) When employees are subject to sound exceeding those listed in Table I of this section, feasible administrative or engineering controls shall be utilized. If such controls fail to reduce sound levels within the levels of the table, personal protective equipment shall be provided and used to reduce sound levels within the levels of the table.

(c) If the variations in noise level involve maxima at intervals of 1 second or less, it is to be considered continuous.

(d) In all cases where the sound levels exceed the values shown herein, a continuing, effective hearing conservation program shall be administered.

Table I

**permissible noise exposures1**

| Duration per day, hours | Sound level dBA slow response |
| --- | --- |
| 8 | 90 |
| 6 | 92 |
| 4 | 95 |
| 3 | 97 |
| 2 | 100 |
| 11/2 | 102 |
| 1 | 105 |
| 1/2 | 110 |
| 1/4 or less | 115 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 When the daily noise exposure is composed of two or more periods of noise exposure of different levels, their combined effect should be considered, rather than the individual effect of each. If the sum of the following fractions: C1/T1 + C2/T2 \* \* \* Cn/Tn exceeds unity, then, the mixed exposure should be considered to exceed the limit value. Cn indicates the total time of exposure at a specified noise level, and Tn indicates the total time of exposure permitted at that level. | |

Exposure to impulsive or impact noise should not exceed 140 dB peak sound pressure level.

[[34 FR 7946](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/34-FR-7946), May 20, 1969, as amended at [35 FR 1015](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/35-FR-1015), Jan. 24, 1970]