alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439

PETER R. MARKSTEINER

CLERK OF COURT

CLERK’S OFFICE

202-275-8000

May 24, 2021

Appointment of New Advisory Council Members

Chief Judge Kimberly A. Moore has appointed the following new members to the 

Advisory Council for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: 

Deanne Maynard (Chair) of Morrison & Foerster LLP

Claudia Burke of U.S. Department of Justice, Commercial Litigation Branch

Alexander Canizares of Perkins Coie LLP

Adam Keser of Saint-Gobain Corporation

Monica Lateef of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Melissa Patterson of U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Appellate Division

Katherine Smith of U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board

These appointments are for terms of three years and are effective May 22, 2021.

The Advisory Council for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

was established pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2077(b) to review, study, and make 

recommendations regarding the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice and Internal 

Operating Procedures of the court, as well as to serve as a conduit between the 

public and the court regarding the court’s procedural rules. The full listing of all 

current members of the Advisory Council is available on the court’s website.

On behalf of the full court, Chief Judge Moore recognizes and thanks the departing 

members of the Advisory Council for their service.

###
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 34A/31 s

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 34A |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 6131 stycznia 2018 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 34A

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 6131 stycznia 2018

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Sprostowania |
| 2018/C 34 A/01 | Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o konkursach otwartych – EPSO/AD/354/17 – Prawnicy lingwiści (AD 7) języka łotewskiego (LV) – EPSO/AD/355/17 – Prawnicy lingwiści (AD 7) języka maltańskiego (MT) ( Dz.U. C 418 A z 7.12.2017 ) | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

Sprostowania

2018/C 34 A/01

Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o konkursach otwartych – EPSO/AD/354/17 – Prawnicy lingwiści (AD 7) języka łotewskiego (LV) – EPSO/AD/355/17 – Prawnicy lingwiści (AD 7) języka maltańskiego (MT) ( Dz.U. C 418 A z 7.12.2017 )

( Dz.U. C 418 A z 7.12.2017 )

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

Sprostowania

| 31.1.2018 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 34/1

---

Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o konkursach otwartych

EPSO/AD/354/17 – Prawnicy lingwiści (AD 7) języka łotewskiego (LV)

EPSO/AD/355/17 – Prawnicy lingwiści (AD 7) języka maltańskiego (MT)

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 418 A z dnia 7 grudnia 2017 r.
  )

(2018/C 034 A/01)

Strona 1:

zamiast:

„
  Termin składania zgłoszeń: 16 stycznia 2018 r. o godz. 12.00 (w południe) czasu środkowoeuropejskiego
  ”,

powinno być:

powinno być:

„
  Termin składania zgłoszeń: 30 stycznia 2018 r. o godz. 12.00 (w południe) czasu środkowoeuropejskiego
  ”.

Strona 5:

Strona 5:

zamiast:

zamiast:

„GDZIE I KIEDY MOŻNA SIĘ ZGŁASZAĆ?

Zgłoszenia można składać przez internet na stronie EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/apply/job-offers_pl do:

16 stycznia 2018 r., godz. 12.00 (w południe) czasu środkowoeuropejskiego
  ”,

powinno być:

powinno być:

„GDZIE I KIEDY MOŻNA SIĘ ZGŁASZAĆ?

Zgłoszenia można składać przez internet na stronie EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/apply/job-offers_pl do:

30 stycznia 2018 r., godz. 12.00 (w południe) czasu środkowoeuropejskiego
  ”.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements at September 30, 1998 (unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (79)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,514
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   110
<PP&E>                                           1,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (394)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,206
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,255
<SALES>                                          6,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,783
<CGS>                                            5,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     52
<INCOME-TAX>                                        11
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 41
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        41
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
#### § 109-38.403-1 Policy.

The policy for assigning responsibility for vehicle damage is to recover from users the costs for damages which would adversely affect the vehicle's resale.
#### Patrick J. GRIFFIN, III, an individual, Point Lookout Prisoner of War Assn., a nonprofit unincorporated association, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., a Mississippi non-profit corporation, Petitioners, v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

No. 04-7030.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 12, 2004.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
#### § 302-9.171 If circumstances warrant an authorization to transport a POV to my post of duty after my assignment to the post of duty, must I sign a new service agreement?

No, if circumstances changed after arrival at your new post of duty to warrant authorization to transport a POV, you are not required to sign a new service agreement, provided a service agreement was signed at the time of your assignment to the post of duty. Violation of that service agreement, however, will result in your personal liability for the cost of transporting the POV.
No. 11-5198.

#### T. A. P. *v.*Alabama.

Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Cer-tiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2018-1358: Colas Solutions, Inc. v. Blacklidge Emulsions, Inc. - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sc5QnAxjRq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-03-2018-2018-1358-colas-solutions-inc-v-blacklidge-emulsions-inc-audio-uploaded\/\">2018-1358: Colas Solutions, Inc. v. Blacklidge Emulsions, Inc.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/12-03-2018-2018-1358-colas-solutions-inc-v-blacklidge-emulsions-inc-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=sc5QnAxjRq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2018-1358: Colas Solutions, Inc. v. Blacklidge Emulsions, Inc.” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"sc5QnAxjRq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Colas Solutions, Inc. v. Blacklidge Emulsions, Inc. (mp3) Appeal Number: 2018-1358 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16612]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(b)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such a 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: August 7, 2000.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Ramada Inn Rockville, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Hameed Khan, PHD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Heath, and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 
6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 23, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-16612 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-2205: CONTENT SQUARE ISRAEL LTD. v. DECIBEL INSIGHT, LTD. [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XTr7LQQ3ZQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/02-23-2023-22-2205-content-square-israel-ltd-v-decibel-insight-ltd-order-22-2205-order-2-23-2023_2085365\/\">22-2205: CONTENT SQUARE ISRAEL LTD. v. DECIBEL INSIGHT, LTD. [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/02-23-2023-22-2205-content-square-israel-ltd-v-decibel-insight-ltd-order-22-2205-order-2-23-2023_2085365\/embed\/#?secret=XTr7LQQ3ZQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-2205: CONTENT SQUARE ISRAEL LTD. v. DECIBEL INSIGHT, LTD. [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"XTr7LQQ3ZQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: CONTENT SQUARE ISRAEL LTD. v. DECIBEL INSIGHT, LTD. [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-2205 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0589 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TIMOTHY ERIC RITESMAN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 20 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 12 2024

01/12/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0589
<TABLE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11
                                  ARMCO INC.
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE 
<CAPTION>
(Dollars and shares in millions,                          Three Months Ended
except per share amounts)                                      March 31, 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            1997       1996
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>        <C>
PRIMARY

Net income                                                 $  9.4     $  6.9 
Preferred stock dividends                                    (4.5)      (4.5)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income applicable to common stock                      $  4.9     $  2.4 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average number of common shares                    106.7      106.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings per common share                                  $ 0.05     $ 0.02 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FULLY DILUTED* 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income applicable to common stock                      $  9.4     $  6.9 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Weighted average number of common shares                    106.7      106.4 
Weighted average number of preferred shares on an 
   "if converted" basis                                      22.7       22.7 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average common shares outstanding as adjusted               129.4      129.1 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings per common share                                  $ 0.07     $ 0.05 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shares of stock outstanding at March 31, 
     Common                                                 107.1      106.7 
     Preferred - $2.10 Class A                                1.7        1.7 
     Preferred - $3.625 Class A                               2.7        2.7 
     Preferred - $4.50 Class B                                1.0        1.0 
<FN>
*  Calculation of fully diluted income per share is submitted in accordance 
with Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 9083, although it is contrary 
to paragraph 40 of APB Opinion No. 15 because it produces an antidilutive 
result, or is not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB Opinion No. 15 
because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
</TABLE>
Order entered April 22, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 16 - 00280 - CV VIEWPOINT, INC. D/B/ A VIEWPOINT CONSTRUC TION SOFTWARE, Appellant V. R&B ROOFING, L.L.C., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 15 - 03209 - E



### O RDER In a letter dated April 19, 2016, counsel for appellant informed the Court that there is no reporter’s record in this appeal. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal be submitted without a report er’s record. Appellant’s brief is due MONDAY, MAY 23, 2016

. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### § 60-40.7 Partial disclosure.

If a requested record contains some materials which are protected from disclosure and other materials which are not so protected, identifying details or protected matters shall be deleted wherever analysis indicates that such deletions are feasible. Whenever such deletions are made, the remainder of the records may be disclosed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CUSTOMPLAY, LLC,

Appellant

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC.,

Appellee

ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE 

FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER 

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF 

THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK 

OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________ 

2020-2208

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-

01497.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JOHN C. CAREY, Carey Rodriguez Milian Gonya, LLP, 

Miami, FL, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

Case: 20-2208 Document: 63 Page: 1 Filed: 02/15/2022
NICHOLAS J. DOYLE. 

 CHRISTIE R.W. MATTHAEI, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & 

Bear, LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for appellee. Also represented by COLIN B. HEIDEMAN; JOSEPH R. RE, Irvine, CA.

 MCKAYE LEA NEUMEISTER, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, 

DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by BRIAN M.

BOYNTON, DANIEL TENNY; KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, MAI-TRANG 

DUC DANG, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF,

ROBERT J. MCMANUS, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office 

of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

February 15, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-2208 Document: 63 Page: 2 Filed: 02/15/2022
17 March 2016

132P11-9

#### Gregory Lynn Gordon v. Frank L. Perry, Secretary, Department of Public Safety; Susan R. White, Superintendent, Alexander Correctional Institution

Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Habeas Corpus*

Denied 02/08/2016

Ervin, J.,

recused
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [NV-930-1020-JL] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior. 

# ACTION:

Public Meetings on the Great Basin Restoration Initiative have been scheduled. The purpose of the meetings is to solicit public comment on this Initiative. The Great Basin Restoration Initiative will implement a set of actions in the Great Basin that will promote both plant community diversity and a structure that allows plant communities to be more resilient to disturbance and invasive species over the long term. The Initiative will increase the ecosystem stability of the Great Basin, and focus on getting the most work done in those areas with the most critical resource values and the highest potential for success through a common approach. 

# SUMMARY:

Public Meetings on the Great Basin Restoration Initiative have been scheduled for: 

— July 17 at the Bureau of Land Management, Elko, Nevada, Field Office. 

— July 18 at the Bureau of Land Management, Ely, Nevada, Field Office. 

— July 19 at the Bureau of Land Management, Nevada State Office in Reno. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jo Simpson, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Office of Communications, PO Box 12000, Reno, Nevada 89520-0006 or telephone (775) 861-6586. 

Dated: June 21, 2000. 

Robert E. Stewart, 

Acting Chief, Office of Communications. 

[FR Doc. 00-16828 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P