alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"18-149: In re: HP INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fNOGGwZArH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/09-25-2018-18-149-in-re-hp-inc-order-18-149-order-09-25-2018_1261331\/\">18-149: In re: HP INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/09-25-2018-18-149-in-re-hp-inc-order-18-149-order-09-25-2018_1261331\/embed\/#?secret=fNOGGwZArH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“18-149: In re: HP INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"fNOGGwZArH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: In re: HP INC. [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 18-149 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
No. 11-9205.

#### Hall, aka Redditt *v.*Ballard, District Attorney, Fayette County, Georgia.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
# Comments on: 22-2140: O’BRIEN v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39879-39882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16261]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00-44]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 00-44 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: June 22, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[[Page 39880]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28JN00.053


[[Page 39881]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28JN00.054


[[Page 39882]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28JN00.055

[FR Doc. 00-16261 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 759

For the relief of Robert and Verda Shatusky.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Robert and Verda Shatusky.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL ANNUITY,

4 SURVIVOR BENEFITS, AND OTHER PAYMENTS

5 UNDER RAILROAD RETIREMENT ACT OF 1974.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Railroad Re7 tirement Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231 et seq.), Robert

8 Shatusky, of Menominee, Michigan, shall be deemed to

9 have had a current connection with the railroad industry

10 at the time that his annuity under section 2(a)(1) of such

11 Act began to accrue.
2

•HR 759 IH

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall apply to

2 any month that begins more than 30 days after the date

3 of the enactment of this Act.

4 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF PAST SUPPLEMENTAL ANNUITY

5 BENEFITS.

6 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

7 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to

8 Robert Shatusky of Menominee, Michigan, a sum that

9 equals the total amount of any supplemental annuity pay10 ments to which Robert Shatusky would have been entitled

11 under section 2(b) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974

12 (45 U.S.C. 231a(b)) if section 1(a) of this Act applied to

13 the period beginning on the date on which his annuity

14 under section 2(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act of

15 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231a(a)(1)) began to accrue and ending

16 on the last day of the month preceding the 1st month to

17 which section 1(a) of this Act applies.

18 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.

19 It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per20 cent of the payment required by section 2 to be paid to

21 or received by any agent or attorney for any service ren22 dered in connection with the payment. Any person who

23 violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction and
3

•HR 759 IH

1 shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in title

2 18, United States Code.

Æ
EXHIBIT 12


                                    KSW, INC.
                     STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET
                            EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Year Ended                Year Ended                 Year Ended
                                                   December 31, 2002         December 31, 2001         December 31, 2000
                                                   -----------------         -----------------         -----------------
<S>                                                <C>                       <C>                       <C>
Net Earnings (loss)                                  $(2,265,000)              $(1,477,000)               $  (266,000)
                                                     ============              ============               ============
Earnings (loss) per share - basic:
   Weighted average shares outstanding
   during the year                                   $ 5,470,311               $ 5,470,311                $ 5,468,991
                                                     ============              ============               ============
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic             $      (.41)              $      (.27)               $      (.05)
                                                     ============              ============               ============
Earnings (loss) per share - diluted:
  Weighted average shares outstanding
  during the year                                    $ 5,470,311               $ 5,470,311                $ 5,468,991

Effect of stock option dilution                      $         -               $         -                $   172,059
                                                     ------------              ------------               ------------
Total shares outstanding for purposes
   of calculating diluted earnings
   per share                                         $ 5,470,311               $ 5,470,311                $ 5,641,050
                                                     ============              ============               ============
Earnings (loss) per common shares
   and common share equivalent - diluted             $      (.41)              $      (.27)               $      (.05)
                                                     ============              ============               ============
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 5, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 41401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16868]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-1394; MM Docket No. 00-55; RM-9836]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Falconer and Fredonia, NY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of North Country Broadcasting, 
Inc., licensee of Station WCQA, Fredonia, NY, dismisses its petition to 
reallot Channel 243A from Fredonia to Falconer, NY, and modify Station 
WCQA's license accordingly. See 65 FR 17618, April 4, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-55, adopted June 14, 2000, and 
released June 23, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-16868 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 5, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16914]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ASO-18]
RIN 2120-AA66


Realignment and Establishment of VOR Federal Airways; KY and TN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a final rule published in the Federal 
Register on June 2, 2000. The legal description of Federal Airway V-384 
inadvertently listed incorrect radials. This action corrects that 
error.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 5, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Brown, Airspace and Rules 
Division, ATA-400, Office of Air Traffic Airspace Management, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591; telephone: (202) 267-8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 2, 2000, Airspace Docket No. 97-ASO-
18, FR Doc. 00-13750, was published establishing V-384 between 
Livingston, TN, and Volunteer, TN. This rule included a legal 
description for V-384, which inadvertently listed incorrect radials. 
This action corrects this situation by omitting the radials in the 
legal description for V-384, thereby eliminating the error.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the legal 
description for V-384 as published in the Federal Register on June 2, 
2000 (65 FR 35272); FR Doc. 00-13750, and incorporated by reference in 
14 CFR 71.1, is corrected as follows:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 35273, the legal description for V-384 is corrected as 
follows:

Paragraph 6010(a)--Domestic VOR Federal Airways

* * * * *

V-384--[Revised]

    From Livingston, TN; to Volunteer, TN.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 27, 2000.
Reginald C. Matthews,
Manager, Airspace and Rules Division.
[FR Doc. 00-16914 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.4.1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


The CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2010, is hereby amended as follows: 


		
	1.
	Section 3.3 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:




3.3. Grant of Awards by Chief Executive Officer.  Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company shall have the power and authority to grant Awards to any Eligible Persons, so long as such Eligible Persons are not officers or directors with reporting obligations under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to determine the terms and conditions of any such Awards.  The Chief Executive Officer, or such other officer as the Chief Executive Officer may designate, may exercise in his or her sole discretion all power and authority of the Committee with respect to such Awards except as otherwise specified in this Plan or by the Committee.  Awards granted by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to this Section 3.3, or by any officer, committee or other person (including the Chief Executive Officer) pursuant to Section 3.2(j), shall be treated as Awards granted by the Committee for all purposes of this Plan, except as otherwise specified herein, and any action taken by the Committee with respect to all Awards, including any action taken pursuant to Section 4.2, shall apply to Awards granted pursuant to this Section 3.3 or Section 3.2(j), unless otherwise specified by the Committee.
2.    Section 4.1 is amended by replacing the first two sentences with the following:
Subject to Section 4.4 and to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2, the number of Shares reserved for delivery under this Plan shall be 11,000,000.
3.    Except as otherwise provided herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CNA Financial Corporation has caused this First Amendment to be effective as of April 27, 2016.
                    


  CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
	
					
	 
	 
	By  
	/s/ Jonathan D. Kantor  
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Jonathan D. Kantor, Executive Vice President
	 

	 
	 
	 
	General Counsel and Secretary
No. 11-1105.

#### Cilman *v.*Reeves et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439

PETER R. MARKSTEINER

CLERK OF COURT

CLERK’S OFFICE

202-275-8000

October 14, 2022

Public Advisory for Federal Circuit’s November Session in Philadelphia

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is sitting in Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania, in addition to its regular session in Washington, D.C., as part of its 

November 2022 session. The full schedule is available on the court’s website.

Due to space occupancy limitations, attendance for the arguments scheduled at area

law schools for November 1st and 2nd will be prioritized in favor of students 

attending the respective institutions as determined by the staff of the law schools. 

The court’s arguments scheduled for November 3rd at the James A. Byrne U.S. 

District Courthouse in Philadelphia are open to the general public.

The audio of each day’s arguments will be made available on the court’s website after 

each day’s arguments conclude. 

For additional information, please contact the Clerk’s Office at 202-275-8035. All 

media inquiries should be directed to publicinformation@cafc.uscourts.gov or to 202-

275-8040.

###
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

HIP, INC., 

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellant

______________________

2022-1696, 22-1780

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:21-cv-00546-CFC, Chief 

Judge Colm F. Connolly.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) Appeal 22-1780 is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 22-1696 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 07/01/2022
2 HIP, INC. V. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION 

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs as to Appeal 

No. 22-1780.

FOR THE COURT

July 1, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 22-1780 only):

July 1, 2022

Case: 22-1696 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 07/01/2022
No. 11-8952.

#### Stone *v.*Missouri Department of Corrections et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 10.400 Classification. A Participating CMS Provider is required to receive and transmit four classes of Alert Messages: Presidential Alert; Imminent Threat Alert; Child Abduction Emergency/AMBER Alert; and Public Safety Message. ( a ) *National Alert.* A National Alert is an alert issued by the President of the United States or the President's authorized designee, or by the Administrator of FEMA. National Alerts may be either nationwide or regional in distribution.
( b ) *Imminent Threat Alert.* An Imminent Threat Alert is an alert that meets a minimum value for each of three CAP elements: Urgency, Severity, and Certainty. ( 1 ) *Urgency.* The CAP Urgency element must be either Immediate (*i.e.*, responsive action should be taken immediately) or Expected (*i.e.*, responsive action should be taken soon, within the next hour).
( 2 ) *Severity.* The CAP Severity element must be either Extreme (*i.e.*, an extraordinary threat to life or property) or Severe (*i.e.*, a significant threat to life or property).
( 3 ) *Certainty.* The CAP Certainty element must be either Observed (*i.e.*, determined to have occurred or to be ongoing) or Likely (*i.e.*, has a probability of greater than 50 percent).
( c ) *Child Abduction Emergency/AMBER Alert.* ( 1 ) An AMBER Alert is an alert initiated by a local government official based on the U.S. Department of Justice's five criteria that should be met before an alert is activated: ( i ) Law enforcement confirms a child has been abducted;
( ii ) The child is 17 years or younger;
( iii ) Law enforcement believes the child is in imminent danger of serious bodily harm or death;
( iv ) There is enough descriptive information about the victim and the abduction to believe an immediate broadcast alert will help; and
( v ) The child's name and other data have been entered into the National Crime Information Center.
( 2 ) There are four types of AMBER Alerts: Family Abduction; Non-family Abduction; Lost, Injured or Otherwise Missing; and Endangered Runaway. ( i ) *Family Abduction.* A Family Abduction (FA) alert involves an abductor who is a family member of the abducted child such as a parent, aunt, grandfather, or stepfather.
( ii ) *Nonfamily Abduction.* A Nonfamily Abduction (NFA) alert involves an abductor unrelated to the abducted child, either someone unknown to the child and/or the child's family or an acquaintance/friend of the child and/or the child's family.
( iii ) *Lost, Injured, or Otherwise Missing.* A Lost, Injured, or Otherwise Missing (LIM) alert involves a case where the circumstances of the child's disappearance are unknown.
( iv ) *Endangered Runaway.* An Endangered Runaway (ERU) alert involves a missing child who is believed to have run away and in imminent danger.
( d ) *Public Safety Message.* A Public Safety Message is an essential public safety advisory that prescribes one or more actions likely to save lives and/or safeguard property during an emergency. A Public Safety Message may only be issued in connection with an Alert Message classified in paragraphs (a), (b) or (c) of this section.
[73 FR 43117, July 24, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 75726, Nov. 1, 2016; 86 FR 46790, Aug. 20, 2021]
#### Andrew G. Weander v. Frank Johnson.

Filed October 2, 1894.

No. 5864.

1. Judgments by Consent: Review. A party cannot be heard to urge error in the proceedings leading to a judgment which was entered by his own consent.

2. Transcripts for Review. The transcript of the record filed in the supreme court imports in this court absolute verity. If in fact incorrect, the district court, and not this court, must make the correction.

Error from the district court of Burt county. Tried below before Scott, J.

*JS. H. Bowes,*for plaintiff in error.

*Sears & Thomas, contra.*

*118Irvine, C.

The record in this ease discloses that the action was begun by Johnson against Weander in the county court of Burt county, where there was a judgment against Weander, from which he appealed to the district court. In the district court there was a motion by Weander to dismiss the case, for the reason that Johnson had failed to file his petition within time. This was overruled and a motion filed by Johnson to dismiss the appeal for want of an answer. An answer was filed notwithstanding this motion, which answer was stricken from the files, leave to refile the same denied, and apparently a default entered, for there then was a- motion to set aside the default, which was also overruled and judgment entered, the judgment reciting that it was the same as had been entered in the county court. The orders of the court on these various motions are assigned as error, but we cannot examine them, for the reason that the record recites that the judgment entered was by consent of the plaintiff in error. Having consented to the judgment, he cannot be heard to urge error in the proceedings leading to it. It is insisted'in the brief that the record is incorrect in this particular and that there was no consent. The transcript of the record imports absolute verity and cannot be impeached in any manner. We must take that transcript as we find it. If the transcript is not correct, or if the record is not correct, the correction must be made in the district court.

Judgment affirmed.
No. 11-5289.

#### Fuller *v.*Mohr, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.

Ct. App. Ohio, Franklin County. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9141.

#### Thomas *v.*Nish, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Waymart, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9617.

#### Campos-Morales *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1





Section 1350


CERTIFICATION








The undersigned officer hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation for the quarter ended June 28, 2009 as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
(2) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE Corporation.





Signed August 6, 2009.








/s/ John C. FanningJohn C. FanningChairman and Chief Executive Officer
1 

### Hall-Jordan, Luke

From: Jones, Danielle <Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 4:26 PM To: Donaldson, David Cc: Arling, Jeremy; Hall-Jordan, Luke Subject: EO 12866/13563 Interagency Review: EPA's Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Update to the Refrigerant Management Requirements Under Se ction 608 of the Clean Air Act (RIN 2060-AS51) Attachments: EO 12866_13563 EPA Refrigerants NPRM.docx



### David,

Attached are the interagency reviewer’s comments. P lease let me know if you have any questions.

Best, Danielle

Danielle Y. Jones Policy Analyst Office of Management and Budget Phone: (202) 395-1741 | djones@omb.eop.gov