alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2203-007; Holt Project]

On Thursday, July 13, 2000, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) staff will conduct a telephone conference with representatives of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, the National Marine Fisheries Service, the Alabama Department of Environmental Management, and Alabama Power Company to discuss the Application for Non-Capacity Amendment of Project License for the Holt Project, FERC Docket No. 2203-007. The Commission staff will initiate the telephone conference. The telephone conference will begin at 2 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (1 p.m. Central Daylight Time).

The telephone conference will be conducted according to the procedures used at Commission meetings. Meeting minutes will be taken, which will be distributed to interested parties and placed in the Commission's public files for the proceeding.

For further information, please contact Steve Kartalia at the Commission, 9202) 219-2942.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16696  Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Glenn Doyle TAYLOR, Jr., Petitioner—Appellant, v. Bonnie BOYETTE, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-6020.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 2004.

Decided March 19, 2004.

Glenn Doyle Taylor, Jr., Appellant pro se.

*46Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Glenn Doyle Taylor, Jr., a North Carolina prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Taylor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
404 A.2d 1357

#### Commonwealth v. Terrance B. Warren, Appellant.

Submitted September 15, 1978.

Thomas G. Klingensmith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Ronald L. Buckwalter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, SPAETH and LIPEZ, JJ.

Judgment of sentencé affirmed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2018-2370: Turner v. Wilkie - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xiDhaFU0JE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-01-2019-2018-2370-turner-v-wilkie-audio-uploaded\/\">2018-2370: Turner v. Wilkie<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-01-2019-2018-2370-turner-v-wilkie-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=xiDhaFU0JE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2018-2370: Turner v. Wilkie” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"xiDhaFU0JE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Turner v. Wilkie (mp3) Appeal Number: 2018-2370 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
No. 11-9474.

#### Fuller *v.*Brown, Superintendent, Eastern New York Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32(b)

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
  10-QSB of Hendrx Corp. (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended
  March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
  hereof (Report), I, Susan Liu, chief financial officer, hereby certify,
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                           
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report
        fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operation of the Registrant.

|s/s
      Susan Liu     | 
|----------------------- | 
|Susan Liu               | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|August 13, 2007         | 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant
  to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
  extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant
  for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under
  the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective
  of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required
  by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the
  Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
  upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
               EXTRACTED FROM THE ARMCO INC. CONDENSED STATEMENT OF 
               CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION AND CONDENSED STATEMENT 
               OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS AND RETAINED DEFICIT AND IS 
               QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
               STATEMENTS. 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                            151,900
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     183,000
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       262,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  603,600
<PP&E>                          1,278,300
<DEPRECIATION>                    612,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,886,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             371,600
<BONDS>                           341,200
<COMMON>                            1,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                       185,900
<OTHER-SE>                       (394,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,886,300
<SALES>                           441,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  441,300
<CGS>                             397,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     397,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  8,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     9,600
<INCOME-TAX>                          200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 9,400
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        9,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.07
        

</TABLE>
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4368

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel SUNRISE.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1994

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

SUNRISE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en-
2

•HR 4368 IH

1 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the

2 vessel SUNRISE (United States official number 950381).

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,912
<INVENTORY>                                      8,325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,917
<PP&E>                                           7,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,359
<SALES>                                         45,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,524
<CGS>                                           35,994
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   419
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       107
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,798)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,798)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.92)
        

</TABLE>
281

282

283

284

285

286

287

288

289

290

291

292

293

294

295

296

297

298

299

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:23:53-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: March 19, 2015 519045 

________________________________

In the Matter of ROY GRAY, 

Petitioner, 

v

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY 

SUPERVISION, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: January 20, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Rose and Egan Jr., JJ.

__________

Roy Gray, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A.

Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review two determinations of the Superintendent of Shawangunk

Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating

certain prison disciplinary rules.

Determinations confirmed. No opinion.

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Rose and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.
-2- 519045 

ADJUDGED that the determinations are confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-2026: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ISSAQUENA COUNTY v. US [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"isPqDAiSa4\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/08-04-2023-22-2026-board-of-supervisors-of-issaquena-county-v-us-opinion-22-2026-opinion-8-4-2023_2168385\/\">22-2026: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ISSAQUENA COUNTY v. US [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/08-04-2023-22-2026-board-of-supervisors-of-issaquena-county-v-us-opinion-22-2026-opinion-8-4-2023_2168385\/embed\/#?secret=isPqDAiSa4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-2026: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ISSAQUENA COUNTY v. US [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"isPqDAiSa4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ISSAQUENA COUNTY v. US [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-2026 Origin: CFC Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
Exhibit






Exhibit 10-a
To:
Viking Asset Purchaser No. 7 IC (the “Purchaser”) 
Citicorp Trustee Company Limited (the “Programme Trustee”) 

06 December 2016
Dear Sirs,
Extension of a receivables purchase agreement between the Purchaser, the Programme Trustee and ourselves as Seller dated 28 June 2011 as amended, (the “Receivables Purchase Agreement”).
We refer to the Receivables Purchase Agreement. We write to record the terms and conditions upon which the parties have agreed to extend the Receivables Purchase Agreement. 
In the definition of Termination Event, sub-clause (a) which appears in Clause 1 of the Receivables Purchase Agreement shall be replaced by “January 31, 2017, is reached”, which, for the avoidance of doubt, means that the Receivables Purchase Agreement will terminate on 31 January 2017.
Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms and conditions contained in this Letter of Agreement by signing and returning the enclosed duplicate.
Yours faithfully,


for and on behalf of 
Meritor HVS AB
/s/ Carl D. Anderson, II        
Carl D. Anderson, II
We accept the terms and conditions set out in the Letter of Agreement of which the foregoing is the duplicate.


/s/ Michael Lombardi         
for and on behalf of  
Viking Asset Purchaser No. 7 IC


/s/ David Mares             
for and on behalf of 
Citicorp Trustee Company Limited
§ 17.21 Painting and lighting, when required. Antenna structures shall be painted and lighted when: ( a ) Their height exceeds any obstruction standard requiring notification to the FAA (see § 17.4(a) and § 17.7).
( b ) The Commission may modify the above requirement for painting and/or lighting of antenna structures, when it is shown by the applicant that the absence of such marking would not impair the safety of air navigation, or that a lesser marking requirement would insure the safety thereof.
( c ) An antenna installation is of such a nature that its painting and lighting specifications in accordance with the FAA airspace recommendation are confusing, or endanger rather than assist airmen, or are otherwise inadequate. In these cases, the Commission will specify the type of painting and lighting or other marking to be used for the particular structure.
[32 FR 11269, Aug. 3, 1967, as amended at 42 FR 54824, Oct. 11, 1977; 79 FR 56986, Sept. 24, 2014]
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2





CONSULTING AGREEMENT


CONSULTING AGREEMENT dated February 1, 2017, by and between Ingevity Corporation (the "Company") and Edward A. Rose (the "Consultant").


WHEREAS, the parties are entering into a Separation and Release Agreement as of even date herewith, and the parties desire to enter into this Consulting Agreement as part of the overall restructuring arrangements being entered into in connection with Consultant’s separation from the Company (the “Separation Agreement”);


WHEREAS, the Company desires to retain the services of Consultant, and Consultant desires to render such services to the Company;


NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:


1.    Services.  During the period from the date of this Agreement through April 30 (the “Consulting Period”), the Consultant agrees to be available to assist the Company with transitional matters related to Consultant’s retirement from the Company (the “Services”).   It is anticipated that such services shall occupy no more than 15% of Consultant’s business time in any given week.  Such services shall be performed remotely and generally at such time(s) as shall be mutually convenient.


2.    Compensation.  Consultant shall be paid $33,333 per month during the Consulting Period, payable on a monthly basis, for a total amount of $100,000 for the Consulting Period as a whole.    


3.    Termination.  The Company may terminate this Agreement in the event that Executive shall be in material breach of Sections 6, 8 or 9 of the Separation Agreement; provided, however, that Executive shall be given ten days’ prior notice and opportunity to cure.  


4.    Independent Contractor Status.
(a)  Consultant's relationship with the Company shall be as an independent contractor and not as an employee, joint venturer, partner, or otherwise. Consultant shall be solely responsible for the payment of all income and self-employment taxes, and any other taxes, on the amounts paid to the Consultant pursuant to the terms of this agreement.  
(b)  Consultant shall not be entitled to participate in any employee welfare or benefit plans of the Company, nor shall Consultant be entitled to sick or vacation days.
(c) Consultant shall have no authority to bind or speak for or on behalf of the Company.


5.    Miscellaneous.  This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of South Carolina.










Exhibit 10.2





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their respective signatures as of the day and year first above written.


INGEVITY CORPORATION




By_/s/ D. Michael Wilson______
D. Michael Wilson
President and CEO








/s/ Edward A. Rose_________
Edward A. Rose
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### §§ 1.258-1.260 [Reserved]