alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bank of Florida Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael L. McMullan, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                            
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael L. McMullan    
|                  |  |     |  | Michael L. McMullan,       
|                  |  |     |  | Principal Executive Officer
#### § 17.50 Cleaning and repainting.

Antenna structures requiring painting under this part shall be cleaned or repainted as often as necessary to maintain good visibility. Evaluation of the current paint status shall be made by using the FAA's In-Service Aviation Orange Tolerance Chart. This chart is based upon the color requirements contained in the National Bureau of Standards Report NBSIR 75-663, Color Requirements for the Marking of Obstructions.

[79 FR 56987, Sept. 24, 2014]
mstr-ex1016_1016.htm



 

Exhibit 10.16

David J. Rennyson, the Senior Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales of MicroStrategy Incorporated (the “Company”), and W. Ming Shao, the Company’s Senior Executive Vice President & General Counsel, each became an executive officer of the Company on January 8, 2016. Mr. Rennyson’s annual base salary is $450,000. Under Mr. Rennyson’s 2016 bonus arrangement, he is eligible to receive a cash bonus award based on (i) his department’s “contribution margin” over a specified threshold and (ii) the annualized value of specific types of contracts over a specified threshold. Pursuant to this arrangement, Mr. Rennyson was awarded a cash bonus in the amount of $672,987. The terms for any cash bonus plan for Mr. Rennyson with respect to 2017 have not been determined. Mr. Shao’s annual base salary is $470,000 and his annual discretionary bonus target is $420,000. Mr. Shao was awarded a cash bonus in the amount of $378,000 with respect to 2016.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

KITTOM SMITH, JR., 

Claimant-Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs, 

Respondent-Appellee

______________________

2024-1028

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 22-4816, Judge Michael P. Allen. 

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 24-1028 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 02/12/2024
2 SMITH V. MCDONOUGH 

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

February 12, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: February 12, 2024

Case: 24-1028 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 02/12/2024
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1304 Information, assistance, and waiver of electronic filing and service requirements. ( a ) For general information and assistance concerning the provisions of this subpart, the Office of General Counsel may be contacted, (202) 418-1700. For more specific information, the Bureau responsible for processing a specific application should be contacted.
( b ) All submissions relating to this subpart shall be made electronically. If an interested party is unable to submit or serve a filing electronically, or if it would be unreasonably burdensome to do so, such party may submit its filing on paper to the appropriate address for the Commission Secretary and serve the filing on other parties by mail. Such party should include as part of its paper submission a request for waiver of the electronic filing requirement. Such waiver request must contain an explanation addressing the requestor's inability to file electronically or why electronic filing would be unreasonably burdensome. Either showing will be sufficient to obtain a waiver under this section.
[85 FR 85530, Dec. 29, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0               6,597,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                 469,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                  42,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0               1,783,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 655,000
<PP&E>                                               0               4,370,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0               2,288,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0              11,946,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0               1,371,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  63,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0              10,327,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0              11,946,000
<SALES>                                     12,786,000               7,775,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,786,000               7,775,000
<CGS>                                        7,111,000               5,733,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,111,000               5,733,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,960,000               6,030,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (353,000)               (384,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,068,000             (3,604,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   382,000               (475,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            686,000             (3,129,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   686,000             (3,129,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11                  (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11                  (0.50)


</TABLE>
§ 17.5 Commission consideration of applications for station authorization. ( a ) Applications for station authorization, excluding services authorized on a geographic basis, are reviewed to determine whether there is a requirement that the antenna structure in question must be registered with the Commission.
( b ) If registration is required, the registrant must supply the structure's registration number upon request by the Commission.
( c ) If registration is not required, the application for authorization will be processed without further regard to this chapter.
[61 FR 4362, Feb. 6, 1996]
bpJ ST+ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET .%c pR&" ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960



### DATE: SUBJECT:

FROM:
TO: THRU: December 17,2010 Additional Informationfor the Technical Support Document for Notice of Proposed Rulemaking -Rome, Georgia nonattainrnent Area: Determination of Attaining Data for the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter Standard Sara Waterson, Environmental Scientist Regulatory Development Section File LynoraeBenjarnin 

# 'e Chief, Regulatory Development Section
This memorandum provides clarifying information in support of EPA's technical support document and the proposed rulemakiig which preliminarily makes the determination that the Rome Area has attained the 1997PM2.5national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). Data substitution was performed by taking the quarterly maximum concentration for the corresponding quarter, using years 2007 - 2009, and substituting that max value for the missing concentration. The average concentration for the most recent three years of available data, i.e., 2007 -2009, with data substitutionwas 14.6 micrograms per cubic meter (pg/m3). This average concentration is consistent with attainment of the NAAQS. Sincethe quarterly

### max value data substitution test resulted in 

### an attaining design value, the design value without data substitution is the official design value. which is 13.3 pg/m3.

Internet Address (URL) http:llw.epa.gov RecycledlRecyclable Pr~nted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Pos~co~~su~?~)
October 27, 2015

Mr. Joseph W. Dinwiddie

29020 Old Cherry Lane

Lebanon, MO 65539

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(l ) and (a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b), of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you 

should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your July 31, 2015 exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−3289, but 

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-4447

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIS LINDSEY O'REILLY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-17-BR)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 3, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Arthur Webb, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Anne M.

Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Willis Lindsey O'Reilly was convicted in 1991 of violating 21

U.S.C. § 846 (1994), and sentenced to a term of 63 months imprisonment and four years supervised release. He began serving his term

of supervised release in 1995 and was subsequently convicted in

state court of taking indecent liberties with a child. Because the

new criminal conduct was a violation of the conditions of

O'Reilly's supervised release, the district court revoked his

supervised release and sentenced him to a term of ten months

imprisonment consecutive to the state sentence. O'Reilly appeals,

alleging that the district court may not have understood its

authority to impose a concurrent sentence instead. We affirm.

At the revocation hearing, O'Reilly requested a sentence concurrent with the state sentence he was then serving. The government

did not oppose a concurrent sentence. However, the district court,

without comment, imposed a consecutive sentence. While U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.3(f), p.s. (1995) calls for a term

of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of supervised release to be

consecutive to any sentence the defendant is serving, the Chapter

7 policy statements are not binding on the district court. See

United States v. Davis, 53 F.3d 638, 641-42 (4th Cir. 1995). There

is no indication in the record that the district court was unaware

of our holding in Davis or believed that it lacked the discretion

to impose a concurrent sentence.

Consequently, we affirm the sentence imposed. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
3

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-006-CV

NO. 2-06-155-CV

Ex Parte S.R.D., a child

In the Interest of B.G.D. a/k/a S.R.D., A Child	APPELLANT

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY	NO. 2-006  -04400    08-089              -CV

JOSEPH H. LEE, III, VIRGINIA K. LEE AND 	APPELLANTS

PATRICIA LEE BARROW AND SAVINGS 

OF AMERICA, INC.		   APPELLANT	

	V.

 OPAL LEE, IN HER CAPACITY AS 	APPELLEE

 InN tThHeE InNtTeErReEsStT oOfF C.K.G. aAnNdD R.T.G., ChHiIlLdDrReEnNTEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF DALE T. LEE, DECEASED

	----------

	FROM THE 362ND362ND          PROBATE DISTRICT COURT  NO. 2 OF DEONTONNTON                     TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the parties’ appellant’s [s’]’ “Joint Motion To Dismiss aThe AppealNotice Of Nonsuit.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(12), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants [ [s][- [oOR the the party incurring the same], for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

									PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

    HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER                                     , JJ.

DELIVERED:    September 28, 2006  May 135, 2008
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 1 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 2 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 3 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 4 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 5 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 6 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 7 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 8 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 9 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 10 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 11 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 12 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 13 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 14 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 15 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 16 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 17 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 18 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 19 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 20 of 21
Case 9:22-cv-81925-AMC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 21 of 21
```

[House Report 106-41]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
1st Session             HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                 106-41
_______________________________________________________________________

 
 PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 707, THE DISASTER MITIGATION 
                     AND COST REDUCTION ACT OF 1999

                                _______
                                

   March 3, 1999.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 91]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 91, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               brief summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 707, 
``The Disaster Mitigation and Cost Reduction Act of 1999,'' 
under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general 
debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure.
    The rule waives clause 4(a) of Rule XIII (requiring a 
three-day layover of the committee report) against 
consideration of the bill. The waiver is necessary because the 
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee was not able to 
file its report until Wednesday, March 3, and the bill may be 
considered in the House on Thursday, March 4. The rule makes in 
order the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
amendment in the nature of a substitute as an original bill for 
the purpose of amendment, which shall be read by title.
    Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record 
prior to their consideration will be given priority in 
recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent 
with House rules. The rule allows for the Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole to postpone votes during the 
consideration of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five 
minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows a fifteen 
minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to 
recommit, with or without instructions.

                                

```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Allis-Chalmers
Corporation. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



DATE: AUGUST 17 2005                        BY:  /S/ MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                                                  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


DATE: AUGUST 17, 2005                        BY:  /S/ VICTOR M. PEREZ
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  VICTOR M. PEREZ
                                                  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



                                       10
Affidavit of Publication/Posting 

with the Rhode Island Office of the Secretary of State 

Database of Proposed Rules and Regulations 

I, Barbara Morin , being duly sworn and under oath, do hereby depose and 

state the following : 

1) I am an employee of the Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air 

Resources, and among my duties is the coordinating of the promulgation of Air 

Pollution Control Regulations. 

2) On July 21, 2010, I posted the required notice of public comment period concerning 

amendments to the Rhode Island Air Pollution Control General Definitions 

Regulation. 

3) On July 21, 2010, 1 verified the publication of the electronic notice described above in 

Paragraph #2 and its availability on the RI Office of the Secretary of State, 

Proposed Rules and Regulations Database, and down loaded a copy of same . A 

true and an accurate copy of the public notice which was published on the Database 

and available to the general public on that date, was downloaded at that time and is 

attached hereto and designated as Exhibit 1 . 

Barbara Morin 

Subscribed nd sworn to befor me 

this ~ r day of ,^7w ,20 l ~ 

Notary Public 

My Commission expires on: `1 un e (1.7 ~t C f -30