# NIOSH Skin Notation (SK) Profiles

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 

# Methyl Isocyanate [CAS No. 624-83-9]ii Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate 

## This document is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted.



# Disclaimer Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations to websites external to NIOSH do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their pro

grams or products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these websites. 

# Ordering Information To receive documents or other information about occupational safety and health topics, contact NIOSH: Telephone: 1–800–CDC–INFO (1–800–232–4636) TTY: 1–888–232–6348 E-mail: cdcinfo@cdc.gov or visit the NIOSH website at www.cdc.gov/niosh

. For a monthly update on news at NIOSH, subscribe to NIOSH eNews by visiting www.cdc.gov/niosh/eNews. 

# Suggested Citation NIOSH [2014]. NIOSH skin notation profiles: methyl isocyanate. By Hudson NL, Dot

son GS. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2014-145. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2014-145 August 2014



### Safer • Healthier • PeopleTMSkin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate iii 

# Foreword As the largest organ of the body, the skin performs multiple critical functions, such as serving as the primary barrier to the external environment. For this reason, the skin is often exposed to potentially hazardous agents, including chemicals, which may contribute to the onset of a spec

trum of adverse health effects ranging from localized damage (e.g., irritant contact dermatitis and corrosion) to induction of immune-mediated responses (e.g., allergic contact dermatitis and pulmonary responses), or systemic toxicity (e.g., neurotoxicity and hepatoxicity). Under

standing the hazards related to skin contact with chemicals is a critical component of modern occupational safety and health programs. In 2009, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) published Current Intelligence Bulletin (CIB) 61: A Strategy for Assigning New NIOSH Skin Notations [NIOSH 2009-147]. This document provides the scientific rationale and framework for the assignment of multiple hazard-specific skin notations (SK) that clearly distinguish between the systemic effects, direct (localized) effects, and immune-mediated responses caused by skin con

tact with chemicals. The key step within assignment of the hazard-specific SK is the determina

tion of the hazard potential of the substance , or its potential for causing adverse health effects as a result of skin exposure. This determination entails a health hazard identification process that involves use of the following:

• 

### Scientific data on the physicochemical properties of a chemical

• 

### Data on human exposures and health effects

• 

### Empirical data from in vivo and in vitro laboratory testing

• 

### Computational techniques, including predictive algorithms and mathematical models that describe a selected process (e.g., skin permeation) by means of ana

lytical or numerical methods. This Skin Notation Profile provides the SK assignments and supportive data for methyl isocya

nate (MIC). In particular, this document evaluates and summarizes the literature describing the hazard potential of the substance and its assessment according to the scientific rationale and framework outlined in CIB 61. In meeting this objective, this Skin Notation Profile intends to inform the audience—mostly occupational health practitioners, researchers, policy- and deci

sion-makers, employers, and workers in potentially hazardous workplaces—so that improved risk-management practices may be developed to better protect workers from the risks of skin contact with the chemicals of interest.



### John Howard, M.D. Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Centers for Disease Control and PreventionSkin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate v 

# Contents
Foreword

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii Abbreviations

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi Glossary

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii Acknowledgments

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix 1 Introduction

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 General Substance Information

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Purpose

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.3 Overview of SK Assignment

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 Systemic Toxicity from Skin Exposure (SK: SYS)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 Direct Effects on Skin (SK: DIR)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4 Immune-mediated Responses (SK: SEN)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5 Summary

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 References

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Appendix: Calculation of the SI Ratio for MIC

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Overview

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Calculation

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Appendix References

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8vi Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate 

# Abbreviations
ACGIH American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry CIB Current Intelligence Bulletin

cm 2 square centimeter(s) DEREK TM Deductive Estimation of Risk from Existing Knowledge DIR skin notation indicating the potential for direct effects to the skin following contact with a chemical EC European Commission GHS G lobally Harmonized System for Classification and Labelling of Chemicals IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer (IRR) subnotation of SK: DIR indicating the potential for a chemical to be a skin irritant following exposure to the skin k

aq coefficient in the watery epidermal layer k

p skin permeation coefficient k

pol coefficient in the protein fraction of the stratum corneum k

psc permeation coefficient in the lipid fraction of the stratum corneum LD 50 dose resulting in 50% mortality in the exposed population LD Lo dermal lethal dose LOAEL lowest-observed-adverse-effect level log K OW base-10 logarithm of a substance’s octanol–water partition M molarity

m 3 cubic meter(s) mg milligram(s) mg/cm 3 milligram(s) per cubic centimeter mg/kg milligram(s) per kilogram body weight MIC methyl isocyanate mL/kg milliliter(s) per kilogram body weight MW molecular weight NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health NOAEL no-observed-adverse-effect level NTP National Toxicology Program OEL occupational exposure limit OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration REL recommended exposure limit RF retention factor SEN skin notation indicating the potential for immune-mediated reactions following exposure of the skin SI ratio ratio of skin dose to inhalation dose SK skin notationSkin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate vii S W solubility SYS skin notation indicating the potential for systemic toxicity following exposure of the skin TDI toluene diisocyanate USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agencyviii Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate 

# Glossary Absorption



### — The transport of a chemical from the outer surface of the skin into both the skin and systemic circulation (including penetration, permeation, and resorption). Acute exposure



### — Contact with a chemical that occurs once or for only a short period of time. Cancer



### —Any one of a group of diseases that occurs when cells in the body become abnormal and grow or multiply out of control. Contaminant



### —A chemical that is (1) unintentionally present within a neat substance or mixture at a concentration less than 1.0% or (2) recognized as a potential carcinogen and present within a neat substance or mixture at a concentration less than 0.1%. Cutaneous (or percutaneous)



### — Referring to the skin (or through the skin). Dermal



### — Referring to the skin. Dermal contact



### — Contact with (touching) the skin. Direct effects



### — Localized, non-immune-mediated adverse health effects on the skin, including corrosion, primary irritation, changes in skin pigmentation, and reduction/ disruption of the skin barrier integrity, occurring at or near the point of contact with chemicals. Immune-mediated responses



### — Responses mediated by the immune system, including allergic responses. Sensitization



### —A specific immune-mediated response that develops following exposure to a chemical, which, upon re-exposure, can lead to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) or other immune-mediated diseases such as asthma, depending on the site and route of re-exposure. Substance



### —A chemical. Systemic effects



### — Systemic toxicity associated with skin absorption of chemicals after exposure of the skin.Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate ix 

# Acknowledgments This document was developed by the Education and Information Division (Paul Schulte, Ph.D., Director). G. Scott Dotson, Ph.D., was the project officer for this document, assisted in great part by Naomi Hudson, Dr.P.H., MPH, Stacey Anderson, Ph.D., and H. Fredrick Frasch, Ph.D. The basis for this document was a report ( Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assess

ment [TERA] ) contracted by NIOSH and prepared by Bernard Gadagbui, Ph.D., and Andrew Maier, Ph.D. For their contribution to the technical content and review of this document, special acknowl

edgment is given to the following NIOSH personnel: Denver Field Office Eric Esswein, M.Sc. Division of Applied Research and Technology Clayton B’Hymer, Ph.D John Snawder, Ph.D. Mark Toraason, Ph.D. Division of Respiratory Disease Studies Gregory A. Day, Ph.D. Aleksander Stefaniak, Ph.D. Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies Matt Dahm, M.Sc. Todd Niemeier, M.Sc. Aaron Sussell, Ph.D. Loren Tapp, M.D. Education and Information Division Devin Baker, M.Ed. Charles L. Geraci, Ph.D. Thomas J. Lentz, Ph.D. Richard Niemeier, Ph.D. Sudha Pandalai. M.D., Ph.D. Health Effects Laboratory Division Vic Johnson, Ph.D. Michael Luster, Ph.D. Anna Shvedova, Ph.D. Paul Siegel, Ph.D. Berran Yucesoy, Ph.D. National Personal Protection Technology Laboratory Heinz Ahlers, M.Sc. Angie Shepherd For their contribution to the technical content and review of this document, special acknowl

edgment is given to the following CDC personnel: Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services/Epidemiology and Analysis Program Office Barbara Landreth, M.A.x Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate In addition, special appreciation is expressed to the following individuals for serving as inde

pendent, external reviewers and providing comments that contributed to the development or improvement of this document: Shane Stephen Que Hee, M.Sc., Ph.D., University of California at Los Angeles, School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA Glenn Sipes, Ph.D., University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ G. Frank Gerberick, Ph.D., The Procter and Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH Dori Germolec, Ph.D., National Toxicology Program, National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle, NC Ben Hayes, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Dermatology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, TN Jennifer Sahmel, M.Sc., CIH, ChemRisk, Boulder, CO James Taylor, M.D., Industrial Dermatology, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OHSkin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate 1 Chemical: Methyl isocyanate (MIC) CAS No: 624-83-9 Molecular weight ( MW ): 57.1 Molecular formula: CH 3 NCO Structural formula: Synonyms: MIC; Isocyanate methane; Isocyanatometh

ane; Isocyanomethane; Methyl carbonyl amine; Methyl ester, Isocyanic acid
Uses: MIC is primarily used as a chemical interme

diate during the manufacturing of carbamate and other pesticides [ACGIH 2001]. 

# 1 Introduction
1.1 General Substance Information

1.2 Purpose This skin notation profile presents (1) a brief summary of epidemiological and toxicological data associated with skin contact with MIC and (2) the rationale behind the hazard-spe

cific skin notation (SK) assignment for MIC. The SK assignment is based on the scientific rationale and logic outlined in the Current In

telligence Bulletin (CIB) 61: A Strategy for As

signing New NIOSH Skin Notations [NIOSH 2009]. The summarized information and health hazard assessment are limited to an evaluation of the potential health effects of dermal exposure to MIC. A literature search was conducted through April 2014 to iden

tify information on MIC, including but not limited to data relating to its toxicokinetics, acute toxicity, repeated-dose systemic toxicity, carcinogenicity, biological system/function– specific effects (including reproductive and developmental effects and immunotoxicity), irritation, and sensitization. Information was considered from studies of humans, animals, or appropriate modeling systems that are rel

evant to assessing the effects of dermal expo

sure to MIC.


## 1.3 Overview of SK Assignment MIC is potentially capable of causing nu

merous adverse health effects following skin contact. A critical review of available data has resulted in the following SK assignment for MIC: SK: SYS-DIR (COR)-SEN . Table 1 provides an overview of the critical effects and data used to develop the SK assignment for MIC. 

# 2 Systemic Toxicity from Skin Exposure (SK: SYS)
There have been no documented dermal ab

sorption studies of MIC in humans or ani

mals. 

### Table 1. Summary of the SK assignment for MIC
Skin notation Critical effect Data available
SK: SYS Acute toxicity Sufficient animal data SK: DIR (COR) Skin corrosion Sufficient animal data SK: SEN Skin allergy Sufficient animal data2 Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate The potential of MIC to pose a skin absorp

tion hazard was also evaluated, with use of a predictive algorithm for estimating and evalu

ating the health hazards of dermal exposure to substances [NIOSH 2009]. The evaluation method compares an estimated dose accumu

lated in the body from skin absorption and an estimated dose from respiratory absorption associated with a reference occupational ex

posure limit. On the basis of this algorithm, a ratio of the skin dose to the inhalation dose (SI ratio) of 3.7 was calculated for MIC. An SI ratio of ≥0.1 indicates that skin absorption may significantly contribute to the overall body burden of a substance [NIOSH 2009]; therefore, MIC is considered to be absorbed through the skin following dermal exposure. Additional information on the SI ratio and the variables used in its calculation are includ

ed in the appendix. No estimated dermal lethal dose (LD Lo ) for humans was identified. However, dermal LD 50 (the dose resulting in 50% mortality in the exposed animals) values of 1800 mil

ligrams per kilogram body weight (mg/kg) and 0.22 milliliters (undiluted) per kilogram (mL/kg) [corresponding to 203 mg/kg] have been reported in rabbits [Mellon Institute 1963, 1970; Smyth et al. 1969; Vernot et al. 1977]. In guinea pigs, Eastman Kodak Com

pany [1990] reported a dermal LD 50 value of 1 to 5 mL/kg [corresponding to 923 mg/kg to 4615 mg/kg]. Because the reported acute dermal LD 50 values for these species are lower than the critical dermal LD 50 value of 2000 mg/kg body weight that identifies chemical substances with the potential for acute dermal toxicity [NIOSH 2009], MIC is considered systemically available and acutely toxic by the dermal route. No effects data were identified regard

ing dermal repeat-dose (21-day or 28-day), sub-chronic (90-day), or chronic (at least 12-month) toxicity of MIC in humans or animals. No standard toxicity or specialty studies evaluating biological system/function specific effects (including reproductive and developmental effects and immunotoxicity) of MIC following dermal exposures were identi

fied. No epidemiological studies or standard animal carcinogenicity studies were identified that evaluated the potential of the chemical to cause tumors. However, studies following the industrial disaster in Bhopal, India in 1984 examined these outcomes following exposure to the eyes, respiratory tract and skin from the MIC gas cloud, which might have also includ

ed exposure to toxic byproducts and contami

nants [Dhara 2002]. While researchers found limited evidence of carcinogenesis, there was evidence that exposure to MIC depressed phagocytic activity of lymphocytes, indicating a toxicological effect [Saxena 1988]. Exposure to MIC from the disaster was also found to lead to reproductive outcomes such as spon

taneous abortion [Bhandari 1990]. Table 2 summarizes carcinogenic designations of multiple governmental and nongovernmental organizations for MIC. No toxicokinetic studies following dermal ex

posure to MIC were identified. However, the capacity of the compound to penetrate the skin can be inferred from the fact that values for the dermal median lethal dose (LD 50 ) have been reported, and is supported by a predictive mathematical model (see Appendix) that in

dicate the chemical can be absorbed through the skin. In addition, acute dermal toxicity studies showed that the MIC is acutely toxic. No repeat-dose or prolonged dermal toxicity studies were identified in humans or animals. Based primarily on observed acute toxicity following dermal exposure [Mellon Insti

tute 1963, 1970; Smyth et al. 1969; Vernot et al. 1977; Eastman Kodak Company 1990] * , there are sufficient data in animals to conclude that MIC is systemically absorbed and acutely toxic. Therefore, on the basis of the data for this assessment, MIC is assigned the SK: SYS notation.

*References in bold text indicate studies that serve

as the basis of the SK assignments.Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate 3 

# 3 Direct Effects on Skin (SK: DIR) No human data on direct effects (corrosivity or irritancy) of MIC were identified. Several experimental animal studies were identified that investigated the direct effects of MIC on skin. Necrosis of the skin occurred at the site of application when undiluted MIC was ap

plied to intact rabbit skin [Mellon Institute 1963, 1970; Smyth et al. 1969], and moder

ate erythema and marked capillary injection occurred when a 10% solution of MIC was applied to intact rabbit skin [Mellon Insti

tute 1963]. Guinea pigs receiving undiluted applications of 1.0-10.0 mL/kg MIC exhib

ited gross edema, necrosis, and hemorrhaging [Eastman Kodak Company 1990]. In another study in guinea pigs, single administrations of 10% or less of MIC produced no irritation to the intact skin, whereas 25% to 100% solutions produced mild, moderate or strong erythema and severity of erythema and edema varied depending on the concentration [E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 1968]. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company [1968] also reported that a second application of MIC to the intact skin of the guinea pigs resulted in increased skin irritation. Dow Chemical Company [1990] reported slight to extensive hyperemia, edema and slight necrosis when the undiluted material was applied twice to the intact or abraded belly of rabbits, whereas no irritation was observed following 10 appli

cations of a 2% solution to the intact belly or ear or three applications of the same solution to abraded belly of rabbits. Predictions using structure activity relationship models provide some additional information regarding this endpoint. The structure activity relationship model, Deductive Estimation of Risk from Existing Knowledge ( DEREK ) for Windows, predicted MIC to be negative for skin irrita

tion, indicating that the substance does not have structural alerts for skin irritation. Although no case reports of skin effects re

sulting from dermal exposure to MIC were identified and the DEREK model predicted MIC to be negative for skin irritation, there was evidence of skin irritation and corrosion in animals. Animal studies [Mellon Insti

tute 1963, 1970; E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 1968; Smyth et al. 1969; Dow Chemical Company 1990; Eastman Kodak 1990] showed that the undiluted material or concentrated solutions are corrosive, while weaker dilutions tend to be non-irritating or slightly irritating to the skin. Therefore, on the 

### Table 2. Summary of the carcinogenic designations * 

### for MIC by numerous governmental and nongovernmental organizations Organization Carcinogenic designation NIOSH [2005] No designation NTP [2011] No designation USEPA [2012] No designation European Parliament [2008] No designation IARC [2007] No designation EC [2014] † No designation ACGIH [2001] No designation
ACGIH = American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; EC = European Commission, Joint Research, Institute for

Health and Consumer Protection; IARC = International Agency for Research on Cancer; NIOSH = National Institute for Occu

pational Safety and Health; NTP = National Toxicology Program; USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency.

* The listed cancer designations were based on data from nondermal (such as oral or inhalation) exposure rather than dermal exposure. † Date accessed.4 Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate basis of the data for this assessment, MIC is assigned the SK: DIR (COR) notation. 

# 4 Immune-mediated Responses (SK: SEN) No human reports were identified that sug

gest that MIC is a skin sensitizer. However, skin sensitization studies in guinea pigs dem

onstrate that the chemical is a skin sensitizer. The Mellon Institute [1963, 1970] reported that MIC was a confirmed sensitizing agent in 16 of 16 guinea pigs following an intrader

mal sensitization test that involved injection of 0.05 mL of a 0.01% solution in peanut oil followed by a series of seven 0.1 mL sensitiz

ing injections. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company [1968] reported allergic dermatitis in 9 of 10 guinea pigs challenged with 5-25% MIC in a 1:1 solution of acetone and diox

ane containing 13% guinea pig fat on intact and abraded skin. Five animals received nine applications of 5% to 25% MIC in guinea pig fat on abraded skin during a three-week period and the remaining five received two intradermal dermal injections of 1% MIC in dimethyl phthalate seven days apart [E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 1968]. Although the Mellon Institute [1963, 1970] observed no cross-sensitization in guinea pigs that were previously sensitized with toluene diisocyanate (TDI), Union Carbide Corpora

tion [1987] reported that 7 of 20 guinea pigs produced positive reactions when the animals were previously sensitized intradermally with 8 applications of MIC followed by a challenge with intradermal injections of TDI. In a simi

lar study, cross-sensitization was observed in 15 of 16 guinea pigs that received intradermal injections of TDI followed by an intradermal challenge with MIC [Union Carbide Corpo

ration 1987]. Supplemental support for the occurrence of cross-sensitization was noted for both TDI and MIC following repeated intranasal instillations of TDI only [Svesson et al. 2009]. DEREK predicted MIC to be a plausible skin sensitizer. Although no diagnostic human patch tests were identified that assessed the potential of MIC to be a skin sensitizer in humans, isocya

nates are known to cause occupation-related allergic contact dermatitis and respiratory sensitization. Sufficient data were identified from predictive tests in guinea pigs [Mel

lon Institute 1963, 1970; E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 1968; Union Car

bide Corporation 1987] , supported by results from a modeling prediction, to conclude thatMIC induces skin sensitization and can crossreact with other isocyanates. Therefore, on the basis of the data for this assessment, MIC is assigned the SK: SEN notation. 

# 5 Summary Toxicokinetic studies that evaluated the po

tential of MIC to be absorbed through the skin following dermal exposure were not identified. However, predictions from a math

ematical model indicate that MIC has the po

tential to be absorbed through the skin. The dermal absorption potential of the chemical is supported by several acute dermal toxicity studies in animals [Mellon Institute 1963, 1970; Smyth et al. 1969; Vernot et al. 1977; Eastman Kodak Company 1990] that show that the chemical is acutely toxic. N o case reports of skin effects resulting from dermal exposure to MIC were identified. However, several skin irritation studies in rabbits and guinea pigs [Mellon Institute 1963; E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 1968; Smyth et al. 1969; Dow Chemical Company 1990; Eastman Kodak 1990] demonstrate that MIC produces skin damage and is cor

rosive in undiluted or very concentrated form , while weaker concentrations produce skin ir

ritation. No diagnostic human patch tests were identified that assessed the potential of MIC to be a skin sensitizer in humans. How

ever, isocyanates generally are known to cause occupation-related allergic contact dermatitis and respiratory sensitization. The potential to cause skin sensitization and to cross-react with related isocyanates is demonstrated bySkin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate 5 several predictive tests in guinea pigs [Mel

lon Institute 1963; E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 1968; Union Carbide Cor

poration 1987] , supported by results from a modeling prediction. Based on the available data, this assessment concludes that there are sufficient data in animals to demonstrate that MIC is absorbed through the skin, is acutely toxic, is corrosive to the skin and can cause skin sensitization and cross-reactivity with other isocyanates. Therefore, on the ba

sis of these assessments, MIC is assigned a composite skin notation of SK: SYS-DIR (COR)-SEN

. Table 3 summarizes the skin hazard designa

tions for MIC previously issued by NIOSH and other organizations. The equivalent der

mal designations for MIC, according to the Global Harmonization System (GHS) of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, are Acute Toxicity Category 3 (Hazard statement: Toxic in contact with the skin), Skin Irritation Category 2 (Hazard statement: Causes skin irritation), and Skin Sensitization Category 1 (Hazard statement: May cause an allergic skin reaction) [European Parliament 2008]. In addition, MIC is identified as a Category 2 Reproductive Toxicant (Hazard statement: Suspected of damaging the unborn child.) [European Parliament 2008]. 

# References
ACGIH (American Conference of Governmen

tal Industrial Hygienists) [2001]. Methyl iso

cyanate. In: Documentation of threshold limit values and biological exposure indices. 7th ed., Vol. 1. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Bhandari NR, Syal AK, Kambo I, nair A, Beohar V, Sexena NC, Dabke AT, Agarwal, SS, Sax

ena BN [1990]. Pregnancy outcome survey in women exposed to toxic gas at Bhopal. Indian J Med Res 92 :28–33. Dhara VR, Dhara R [2002]. The Union Carbide disaster in Bhopal: A review of health effects. Arch Environ Health 57 (5):391–404. Dow Chemical Company [1990]. Results of range finding toxicological tests on methyl isocyanate. Midland, MI: Dow Chemical Company, Bio

chemical Research Laboratory. On file with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under TSCA Section 8D. OTS #0530132. Document # 86-910000361S. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company [1968]. Dermal irritation and sensitization tests of methyl isocyanate in guinea pigs. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company. On file with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under TSCA Section 8D. OTS #0571239. Document # 88-920009582. Eastman Kodak Company [1990]. Health and safety study on methyl isocyanate. Rochester, NY: Eastman Kodak Company. On file with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under 

### Table 3. Summary of previous skin hazard designations for MIC Organization Skin hazard designation NIOSH [2005] [skin]: Potential for dermal absorption OSHA [2014]* [skin]: Potential for dermal absorption ACGIH [2001] [skin]: Based on the reported mortality in rabbits following topical application and absorption of MIC. EC [2014]* R24: Toxic in contact with skin R38: Irritating to skin R43: May cause sensitization by skin contact ACGIH = American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; EC = European Commission, Joint Research, Institute

for Health and Consumer Protection; NIOSH = National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; OSHA = Occupational Safety and Health Administration. *Date accessed.6 Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate TSCA Section 8D. OTS #0528350. Document # 86-910000056. EC (European Commission) [ND]. Methyl iso

cyanate. In: EINICS (European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances), http://esis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/. Accessed: 05-01-14. European Parliament, Council of the European Union [2008]. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, label

ling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/ EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regu

lation (EC) No 1907/2006. OJEU, Off J Eur Union L353:1–1355, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008: 353:0001:1355:EN:PDF. Accessed: 05-01-14. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) [2007]. Agents reviewed by the IARC monographs. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to hu

mans, http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Clas

sification/Listagentsalphorder.pdf. Accessed: 05-01-14. Mellon Institute [1963]. Range finding tests on methyl isocyanate. Pittsburgh: Mellon Institute Report 26-75, Union Carbide Corporation In

dustrial Fellowship 274-26. On file with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under TSCA Section 8D. OTS #0529151. Document #86-910000658D. Mellon Institute [1970]. Methyl isocyanate: acute inhalation toxicity, human response to low con

centrations, guinea pig sensitization, and cross sensitization to other isocyanates. Pittsburgh: Mellon Institute Confidential Special Report 33-19 for Union Carbide Corporation. On file with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen

cy under TSCA Section 8D. OTS #0528500. Document #86-910000268. NIOSH [2005]. Methyl Isocyanate. In: NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Pre

vention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publica

tion No. 2005-149, http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ npg/. Accessed: 05-01-14. NIOSH [2009]. Current intelligence bulletin 61: a strategy for assigning new NIOSH skin notations. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National In

stitute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009-147, http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2009-147/ pdfs/2009-147.pdf. Accessed: 05-01-14. NTP [2011]. Report on Carcinogens. Twelfth Edition; U.S. Department of Health and Hu

man Services, Public Health Service. Na

tional Toxicology Program, http://ntp.niehs. nih.gov/ntp/roc/twelfth/roc12.pdf

. Accessed 05-01-14. OSHA [ND]. Methyl isocyanate. In: Chemical sampling information, http://www.osha.gov/ dts/chemicalsampling/data/CH_254200.html. Accessed 05-01-14. Saxena AK, Singh KP, Nagel SL, Gupta BN, Ray PK, Srivastav RK, Tewari SP, Singh R [1988]. Effect of exposure to toxic gas on the popu

lation of Bhopal: Part IV—Immunological and chromosomal studies. Indian J Exp Biol 26 (3):173–176. Smyth HF, Carpenter CP, Weil CS, Pozzani UC, Strigel JA, Nycum JS [1969]. Range-finding toxicity data: List VII. Amer Ind Hyg Assoc J 30 (5):470–476. Svensson-Elfsmark L, Koch BL, Gustafsson A, Bucht A [2009]. Rats repeatedly exposed to Toluene diisocyanate exhibit immune reactivity against Methyl isocyanate-protein conjugates. Int Arch Allergy immuniol 150 (3):229–236. Union Carbide Corporation [1987]. Methyl iso

cyanate: a review of toxicological studies. By Dodd DE. Export, PA: Union Carbide Cor

poration, Bushy Run Research Center. On file with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen

cy under TSCA Section 8D. OTS #0204924-3. Document #89-878000082. USEPA [2012]. Integrated Risk Information Sys

tem: methyl isocyanate. In: Integrated Risk Information System, http://www.epa.gov/iris/ subst/0527.htm. Accessed: 05-01-14. Vernot EH, MacEwen JD, Haun CC, Kinkead ER [1977]. Acute toxicity and skin corrosion data for some organic and inorganic compounds and aqueous solutions. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 42 (2):417–423.Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate 7 

# Appendix: Calculation of the SI Ratio for MIC This appendix presents an overview of the SI ratio and a summary of the calculation of the SI ratio for MIC. Although the SI ratio is considered in the determination of a sub

stance’s hazard potential following skin con

tact, it is intended only to serve as supportive data during the assignment of the NIOSH SK. An in-depth discussion on the rationale and calculation of the SI ratio can be found in Appendix B of the Current Intelligence Bul

letin (CIB) 61: A Strategy for Assigning New NIOSH Skin Notations [NIOSH 2009].


## Overview The SI ratio is a predictive algorithm for esti

mating and evaluating the health hazards of skin exposure to substances. The algorithm is designed to evaluate the potential for a sub

stance to penetrate the skin and induce sys

temic toxicity [NIOSH 2009]. The goals for incorporating this algorithm into the pro

posed strategy for assigning SYS notation are as follows:
1. Provide an alternative method to evalu

ate substances for which no clinical re

ports or animal toxicity studies exist or for which empirical data are insufficient to determine systemic effects. 2. Use the algorithm evaluation results to determine whether a substance poses a skin absorption hazard and should be la

beled with the SYS notation. The algorithm evaluation includes three steps:
1. determining a skin permeation coeffi

cient ( k p ) for the substance of interest, 2. estimating substance uptake by the skin and respiratory absorption routes, and 3. evaluating whether the substance poses a skin exposure hazard. The algorithm is flexible in the data require

ment and can operate entirely on the basis of the physicochemical properties of a substance and the relevant exposure parameters. Thus, the algorithm is independent of the need for biologic data. Alternatively, it can function with both the physicochemical properties and the experimentally determined permeation coefficient when such data are available and appropriate for use. The first step in the evaluation is to deter

mine the k p for the substance to describe the transdermal penetration rate of the substance [NIOSH 2009]. The k p , which represents the overall diffusion of the substance through the stratum corneum and into the blood capil

laries of the dermis, is estimated from the compound’s molecular weight ( MW ) and base-10 logarithm of its octanol–water par

tition coefficient (log K OW

). In this example, k p is determined for a substance with use of Equation 1. A self-consistent set of units must be used, such as outlined in Table A1. Other model-based estimates of k p may also be used [NIOSH 2009].


### Equation 1: Calculation of Skin Permeation Coefficient ( k p 

### )

aq pol psc p 

## k k k k 1 1 1

+ + =

Where K psc is the permeation coefficient in the lipid fraction of the stratum corneum, K pol is the coefficient in the protein fraction of the stratum corneum, and K aq is the coefficient in the watery epidermal layer. These components are individually estimated by log k psc

= −1.326 + 0.6097 × log K
ow − 0.1786

× MW 0.5
k pol

= 0.0001519 × MW −0.5
k aq = 2.5 × MW −0.5 The second step is to calculate the biologic mass uptake of the substance from skin ab

sorption (skin dose) and inhalation (inhala

tion dose) during the same period of exposure.8 Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate The skin dose is calculated as a mathematical product of the k p , the water solubility ( S W ) of the substance, the exposed skin surface area, and the duration of exposure. Its units are mil

ligrams (mg). Assume that the skin exposure continues for 8 hours to unprotected skin on the palms of both hands (a surface area of 360 square centimeters [cm 2 ]). 

### Equation 2: Determination of Skin Dose Skin dose

= k p × S
w × Exposed skin surface area × Exposure time

= k p (cm/hour) × S
w (mg/cm 3 ) × 360 cm 2 × 8 hours The inhalation dose (in mg) is derived on the basis of the occupational exposure limit (OEL) of the substance—if the OEL is de

veloped to prevent the occurrence of systemic effects rather than sensory/irritant effects or direct effects on the respiratory tract. Assume a continuous exposure of 8 hours, an inhala

tion volume of 10 cubic meters (m 3 ) inhaled air in 8 hours, and a factor of 75% for reten

tion of the airborne substance in the lungs during respiration (retention factor, or RF). 

### Equation 3: Determination of Inhalation Dose Inhalation dose = OEL × Inhalation volume × RF = OEL (mg/m 3 ) × 10 m 3

× 0.75 The final step is to compare the calculated skin and inhalation doses and to present the result as a ratio of skin dose to inhalation dose (the SI ratio). This ratio quantitatively indi

cates (1) the significance of dermal absorp

tion as a route of occupational exposure to the substance and (2) the contribution of dermal uptake to systemic toxicity. If a substance has an SI ratio greater than or equal to 0.1, it is considered a skin absorption hazard.


## Calculation Table A1 summarizes the data applied in the previously described equations to determine the SI ratio for MIC. The calculated SI ratio was ~3.7. On the basis of these results, MIC is predicted to represent a skin absorption hazard. 

## Appendix References NIOSH [2005]. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Dis

ease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005–149, http:// www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/. Accessed: 05-01-14

. NIOSH [2009]. Current intelligence bulletin 61: a strategy for assigning new NIOSH skin no

tations. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Dis

ease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009-147, http:// www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2009-147/pdfs/2009- 147.pdf. Accessed: 05-01-14. SRC [2009]. Interactive PhysProp database demo, http://www.srcinc.com/what-we-do/databas

eforms.aspx?id=386 . Accessed: 05-01-14.Skin Notation Profiles | Methyl isocyanate 9 

### Table A1. Summary of data used to calculate the SI ratio for MIC

Variables used in calculation Units Value Skin permeation coefficient

Permeation coefficient of stratum corneum lipid path(k psc ) cm/hr 6.4072 × 10 -3 Permeation coefficient of the protein fraction of the stratum cor

neum (k pol ) cm/hr 2.0111 × 10 -5 Permeation coefficient of the watery epidermal layer (k aq ) cm/hr 0.331 Molecular weight (MW) * amu 57.1 Base-10 logarithm of its octanol–water partition coefficient (Log

K
ow ) * None 0.79 Calculated skin permeation coefficient (k p ) cm/hr 6.3049 × 10 -3 Skin dose

Water solubility (S w ) * mg/cm 3 29.2 Calculated skin permeation coefficient (k p ) cm/hr 6.3049 × 10 -3 Estimated skin surface area (palms of hand) cm 2 360 Exposure time hr 8 Calculated skin dose mg 530.22 Inhalation dose

Occupational exposure limit (OEL) † mg/m 3 0.05 Inhalation volume m 3 10 Retention factor (RF) None 0.75 Inhalation dose mg 144 Skin dose–to–inhalation dose (SI) ratio None 3.68
*Variables identified from SRC [2009]. † The OEL used in calculation of the SI ratio for MIC was the NIOSH recommended exposure limit (REL) of 1 part per million

(5 mg/m 3 ) [NIOSH 2005].