alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7230
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDWARD HAROLD SAUNDERS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-17, CA-97-168-3-P) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William P. Robinson, Jr., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Saunders , Nos. CR-94-17; CA-97-168-3-P (W.D.N.C. July 16, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-K/A ), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
 Date: July 24, 2006

/s/ Thomas G. WiggansThomas G. WiggansChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 10.2**

**SUMMARY OF AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND ANNE BRENNAN**

Anne Brennan was appointed Interim Chief Financial Officerof Openwave Systems Inc., effective January 13, 2008. As part of her duties, Ms. Brennan will serve as the Company’s principal financial and accounting officer until a new Chief Financial Officer is named by the Company. 

Ms. Brennan’s initial compensation as Interim Chief Financial Officer is an annual base salary of $239,000. Ms. Brennan is also eligible for aquarterly incentive cash compensation award targeted at 35% of her annual base salary (i.e., $20,913 for each quarter, at her initial base salary). Her actual incentive compensation will be determined based upon a combination of Openwave’sachievement level against financial and other performance objectives established by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Executive Officer’s assessment of her individual performance, and may result in a payment that is below, at, or abovetarget. Additionally, Ms. Brennan is entitled to a $5,000 monthly bonus payment for a period of six months or until such time as the Company has named a new Chief Financial Officer, whichever occurs first. 

Ms. Brennan is also (i) a party to the Openwave’s standard executive change of control severance agreement, (ii) a beneficiary under Openwave’sExecutive Severance Benefit Policy, (iii) a party to Openwave’s standard director and executive officer indemnification agreement and (iv) a party to Openwave’s standard confidential information and invention assignmentagreement.
2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

(3) The Clerk’s Office will continue to accept 

documents that can only be filed by paper and 

filings from parties who are not permitted to file 

electronically. These filings will continue to be 

received by U.S. Postal Mail, third-party 

commercial carriers, or at the court’s night box 

located at the garage entrance on H Street NW, 

between 15th Street and Madison Place. 

(4) Federal Circuit Rule 25(b)(2) is suspended and pro 

se parties are permitted to submit case-initiating 

documents by either facsimile (202-275-9678) or 

email (prose@cafc.uscourts.gov). Federal Circuit 

Rule 25(c)(2) is modified to allow pro se parties to 

submit any other case filing by either facsimile or 

email. The filing date of the document will be the 

system date stamp when the Clerk’s Office receives 

the facsimile or email. Proof of service on the 

opposing party, and calculation of any responsive 

deadline, will be from the date when the Clerk of 

Court dockets and serves the document through 

the court’s electronic filing system. 

(5) In implementing paragraph 4, the Clerk’s Office is 

directed to accept for filing only documents 

submitted by email to prose@cafc.uscourts.gov. 

Documents emailed to other court email accounts 

will receive no action. Following notice and an 

opportunity to respond, the Clerk of Court, or 

designee, is authorized to restrict or to revoke the 

ability of a litigant or member of the public to file 

by facsimile or email for either (a) repeated failure 

to comply with these procedures or (b) engaging in 

spamming or excessive submissions that interfere 

with court operations. 

(6) The Clerk’s Office is directed to provide the ability 

for pro se parties to receive electronic service by 

email for those pro se parties who consent to such 

service pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 25(c)(2). 

(7) The Clerk’s Office will continue to issue Notices to 

Advise of Scheduling Conflicts and to require a
§ 128-1.5007 Reproduction of departmental and bureau seals. ( a ) Requests for permission to reproduce the Departmental seal for commercial, educational, ornamental or other purposes by other government agencies or private entities shall be referred to the Assistant Attorney General for Administration for decision.
( b ) Requests for permission to reproduce the seals of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Bureau of Prisons, the Federal Prison Industries, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Board of Parole, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the United States Marshals Service for such purposes by other government agencies or private entities shall be referred to the head of the respective Departmental organization for decision.
( c ) The decision whether to grant such a request shall be made on a case-by-case basis, with consideration of any relevant factors, which may include the benefit or cost to the government of granting the request; the unintended appearance of endorsement or authentication by the Department; the potential for misuse; the effect upon Departmental security; the reputability of the use; the extent of control by the Department over the ultimate use; and the extent of control by the Department over distribution of any products or publications bearing a Departmental seal.
[45 FR 55727, Aug. 21, 1980]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                            530
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                      472
<INVENTORY>                                    46,227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                          7,062
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 60,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       19,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   60,450
<SALES>                                         7,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               30,823
<CGS>                                           4,509
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  27,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,190
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,243
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,947
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .45
        


</TABLE>
No. 11-1223.

#### In re Shang.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MELVIN ISAIAH SCURRY, ) DOC #Y63047, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3176 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed January 23, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; J. Frank Porter, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
No. D-2674.

#### In re Discipline of Seto.

Robert M. M. Seto, of Virginia Beach, Va., is suspended from the practice of law. in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0               8,608,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               1,628,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0               2,726,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0              13,114,000
<PP&E>                                               0               3,658,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0               1,562,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0              15,679,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0               1,933,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  63,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0              13,645,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0              15,679,000
<SALES>                                     14,091,000              12,786,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,091,000              12,786,000
<CGS>                                        6,892,000               7,111,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,892,000               7,111,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,044,000               4,960,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (208,000)               (353,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,363,000               1,068,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,237,000                 382,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,126,000                 686,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,126,000                 686,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36                    0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34                    0.11
        

</TABLE>
#### ASM AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and Arthur Sherman, Plaintiff-Appellant, and ASM International, N.V., Counterclaim Defendant, v. Genus, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee.

Nos. 04-1211, 04-1240.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 5, 2004.

ORDER

Order Vacated, See 2004 WL 635216.

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. RApp. P. 42(b).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 3, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60071 Summary Calendar

ERIC JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DIANE PARKER, Executrix of the Estate of Barry Parker, deceased, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:96-CV-1-P-A

-------------------- Before: BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eric Jones, Mississippi prisoner # 45265, appeals from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on the basis that the estate of Barry Parker has been closed and lacks assets from which Jones may recover damages. The ability of a plaintiff to recover under state law does not determine whether the plaintiff’s action may proceed in federal court. Ransom v.
Brennan , 437 F.2d 513, 520 (5th Cir. 1971). Moreover, it isunclear whether Jones is precluded from reopening the estate and

recovering damages should he prevail on his substantive claims. See Smith v. Estate of King , 501 So. 2d 1120, 1122-23 (Miss. 1987); Powell v. Buchanan , 147 So.2d 110, 111-12 (Miss. 1962). VACATED AND REMANDED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"23-121: In Re LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Wizy4dcehv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/02-23-2023-23-121-in-re-lenovo-united-states-inc-order-23-121-order-2-23-2023_2085071\/\">23-121: In Re LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/02-23-2023-23-121-in-re-lenovo-united-states-inc-order-23-121-order-2-23-2023_2085071\/embed\/#?secret=Wizy4dcehv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“23-121: In Re LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"Wizy4dcehv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: In Re LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 23-121 Origin: RIT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
#### § 105-53.142 Office of Public Affairs.

The Office of Public Affairs, headed by the Associate Administrator for Public Affairs, is responsible for the planning, implementation, and coordination of GSA public information and public events and employee communication activities, and managing and operating the Consumer Information Center.

[51 FR 23230, June 26, 1986]
No. 11-72.

#### FirstBank Puerto Rico, Inc., et al. *v.*La Vida Merger Sub, Inc., et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
(1795) 

II. COMMITTEE ACTIONS AND FILINGS OF 

THE PARTIES PRIOR TO THE AUGUST 4, 

2010 HEARING ON PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS 

d. Pre-Trial Motions 

iv. Motion for an Extended Evidentiary Hearing 
1796 
1797 
1798 
1799 
1800 
1801 
1802 
1803 
1804 
1805 
1806 
1807 
1808 
1809 
1810 
1811 
1812 
1813 
1814 
1815 
1816 
1817 
1818 
1819 
1820 
1821 
1822 
1823 
1824 
1825 
1826 
1827
# United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit

Nos. 19

- 1990, 21

- 118 4

UNIBANK FOR SAVINGS,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

999 PRIVATE JET, LLC.; ELINA SARGSYAN; EDGAR SARGSYAN,

Defendants, Appellees.

SBK HOLDINGS USA, INC.

Intervenor, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on April 11 , 2022, is amended as follows:

On page 5 , n.4, line 2 , replace "Ca." with "Cal."

On page 7 , line s 2

- 3 , replace "see also" with " see also

. "

On page 7, line 7, replace " 462 U.S. " with "462 U.S."

On page 7, line 18, replace "guide" with "Guide

. "

On page 7, line 22, replace "guide" with "Guide

. "

On page 11, line 17, replace "infra" with "supra

. "

On page 13, line 10, replace "Dion" with " Dion

. "
1246

1247

1248

1249

1250

1251

1252

1253

1254

1255

1256

1257

1258

1259

1260

1261

1262

1263

1264

1265

1266

1267

1268

1269

1270

1271

1272

1273

1274

1275

1276

1277

1278

1279

1280

1281

1282

1283

1284

1285

1286

1287

1288

1289

1290

1291

1292

1293

1294

1295

1296

1297

1298

1299

1300

1301

1302

1303

1304

1305

1306

1307

1308

1309

1310

1311

1312

1313

1314

1315

1316

1317

1318

1319

1320

1321

1322

1323

1324

1325

1326

1327

1328

1329

1330

1331

1332

1333

1334

1335

1336

1337

1338

1339

1340

1341

1342

1343

1344

1345

1346

1347

1348

1349

1350

1351

1352

1353

1354

1355

1356

1357

1358

1359

1360

1361

1362

1363

1364

1365

1366

1367

1368

1369

1370

1371

1372

1373

1374

1375

1376

1377

1378

1379

1380

1381

1382

1383

1384

1385

1386

1387

1388

1389

1390

1391

1392

1393

1394

1395

1396

1397

1398

1399

1400

1401

1402

1403

1404

1405

1406

1407

1408

1409

1410

1411

1412

1413

1414

1415

1416

1417

1418

1419

1420

1421

1422

1423

1424

1425

1426

1427

1428

1429

1430

1431

1432

1433

1434

1435

1436

1437

1438

1439

1440

1441

1442

1443

1444

1445

1446

1447

1448

1449

1450

1451

1452

1453

1454

1455

1456

1457

1458

1459

1460

1461

1462

1463

1464

1465

1466

1467

1468

1469

1470

1471

1472

1473

1474

1475

1476

1477

1478

1479

1480

1481

1482

1483

1484

1485

1486

1487

1488

1489

1490

1491

1492

1493

1494

1495

1496

1497

1498

1499

1500

1501

1502

1503

1504

1505

1506

1507

1508

1509

1510

1511

1512

1513

1514

1515

1516

1517

1518

1519

1520

1521

1522

1523

1524

1525

1526

1527

1528

1529

1530

1531

1532

1533

1534

1535

1536

1537

1538

1539

1540

1541

1542

1543

1544

1545

1546

1547

1548

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:23:17-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to AnnualReport of Elixir Gaming Technologies, Inc. (formerly known as VendingDataCorporation) (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Gordon Yuen, Chief Executive Officer, and David R. Reberger, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/Gordon  Yuen                                       |   | Dated: | November 12, 2007 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------|
|   | Gordon  Yuen                                          |   |   |
| Title: | Chief  Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer |   |   |

 
| By:    | /s/David  R. Reberger   |   | Dated: | November 12, 2007 |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------|
|   | David R. Reberger       |   |   |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

This certification is made solely for the purposes of18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein,and not for any other purpose.

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1930 Liquidation from final check or recovery from other payment. ( a ) If the employee retires or resigns or if his or her employment or period of active duty ends before collection of the debt is completed, offset of the entire remaining balance of the debt may be made from a final payment of any nature, including, but not limited to a final salary payment or lump-sum leave due the employee as the date of separation, to such extent as is necessary to liquidate the debt.
( b ) If the debt cannot be liquidated by offset from a final payment, offset may be made from later payments of any kind due from the United States, including, but not limited to, the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, pursuant to § 1.1913.