## APPENDIX B.2 PM10 

## ALLOWABLE EMISSION CALCULATIONS FOR YEAR 2005 PLAN FOR STEUBENVILLE FACILITIES

# (

Steubenville Emission Summary Allowable. PM10 (Ib/hr) 24-Hour Annual
a. Briquetting 

# 0.17 0.12 

# b. Emergency Water Pump 

# 0.19 0.01 c. Roads 

# 1.72 1.66 d. EAF Scrap Handling 

# 4.42 1.46 TOTALS 6.50 3.25

Appendix B.2 I 

## Page 1 .of 4a. BriqueUing EMISSION RATE FOR 24-HOUR MODELING PERIOD 1 M 1 TSP TSP 'PM10 Material Throughput Moisture EF 2**Effecti~** Emissions Emissions (tons/hr) Content (%) (Ib/ton) Drop Points (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) Inside building: Mill Scale 7.67 7.5 0.0005 0.08 3 0.0003 0.0001 C Scrap 20.41 4.0 0.0012 0.08 3 0.0019 0.0009 BF Sludge (FilterCake) 5.08 25.0 0.0001 0.08 3 0.0000 0.0000 Flue Dust 7.67 1.0 0.0082 0.08 3 0.0051 0.0024 Coke Breeze 5.08 7.5 0.0005 0.08 3 0.0002 0.0001 Portland Cement 8.10 2.0 0.0031 0.02 4 0.0005 0.0002 Outside building: Briquet 54.00 2.0 0.0031 1.00 6 0.1688 0.0798 Total: , 0.1768 0;0836 Cement Silo Stack
- 1,5 0.02 gr/acfm 525 acfm 0.09 Ib/hr PM10 Total PM10
- 0.174 Ib/hr PM10 EMISSION RATE FORANNUAL MODELING PERIOD 7 M 1 TSP TSP PM10 Material Throughput Moisture EF 2**Effecti~** Emissions Emissions (tons/hr) Content (%) (lbIton) Drop Points (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) Inside building: Mill Scale 5.11 7.5 0.0005 0.08 3 0.0002 0.0001 C Scrap 13.61 4.0 0.0012 0.08 3 0.0013 0.0006 BF Sludge (FillerCake) 3.38 25.0 0.0001 0.08 3 0.0000 0.0000 Flue Dust 5.11 1.0 0.0082 0.08 3 0.0034 0.0016 Coke Breeze 3.38 7.5 0.0005 0.08 3 0.0001 0.0001 Portland Cement 5.40 2.0 0.0031 0.02 4 0.0003 0.0002 Outside building: Briquet 36.00 2.0 0.0031 1.00 6 0.1125 0.0532 Total: 0.1179 0.0558 Cement Silo Stack
- 1,5,7 0.02gr/acfm 525 acfm 0.06 IblhrPM10

.--------- ---- ------------ -----,----,---- 0"

__ '- -_._------_._--_._._--_._._._
..**~--_** .._---------_._-------, .._-------..._-_.....-._...._---_.

__.. ---- - . ._- ---------_.. Total PM10
- 0.116 Ib/hr PM10
1. From H.G.Strohrreyer FAXof 01/27/00, Briquet production 230,000tons peryear 16 hours/day, 54 tons/hr, SUo pararreters. 2. 

### s= = (k)(.0032) (U/5)"1.3/(M'2)"1.4 AP-42 13.2.4 U = 6.19 rrph kTSP= 0.74 k RIiI10= 0.35 3. Drop points inside building: Control Efficiency: 1. Fromtruckto storage bin 0.98 The PF Environrrental BuUdlng wII be sealed 2. From storage bin by front loader 0.98 3. Front loadertoweight batcher 0.98 4. Fromweight batcherto rrixer 0.98 Material is wetafter rrixer 3.92 Total Effective Drop A:lints = 4 total drops,total control efficiency fraction (4
- 3.92 = 0.08) 4. Carrent is rroved fromsilo to rrixer In corrpletely enclosed COnveyor
- onedroppointto rrixer at 98% efficiency. 5. Carrent is pneumatically conveyed fromtruckto sUo and controlled by bin vent filler. 6. Briquet is rroved by conveyorfrom building to RRcar - one drop point. no control. 7. Throughput adjusted fortw 0 8-hourshifts/day.

## Appendix B.2, Page 2 of4 

# (



# (



# ( (



### {

{



### (

(

(



## l

{

# ,(

( b. EmergencyWater Pump WPSGwill install a diesel powered emergency water pump emitting 84.32 grams/hour or 0.1859 Ib/hour, 24 hour modeling rate The pump will run no more than 500 hours/year,

0.0106 Ib/hour, annual modeling·rate



# c. Roads and Parking Lots 1741090010 F101

Road Controlled Section 24-Hour Annual Pa\ted A 1.0528 1.0528 

## 8 0.2495 0.2495 C 0.0277 0.0277 D1 0.1006 0.1006 D2 0.1275 0.1275 H1 0.0283 0.0283 

## K 0.0000 0.0000 

## L 0.0011 0.0011 Unpa\ted D 0.0244 0.0135 

## E 0.0249 0.0138 F 0.0031 0.0017 

## G 0.0054 0.0030 H2 0.0629 0.0348 

## J 0.0132 0.0073 TOTAL 1.7214 1.6614



## Appendix B. 2, Page· 30f 

## 4

## d. Strauss Industries
- Scrap Processing Emissions from EAF scrap handling would be 1.925 MM tons steel *.1.11 conversion * 0.00927 IbsPM/ton scrap 

# = 9.91 tons/year. BOF scrap handling is 0.868 tons/year from A scrap and 2.732 tons/year from remaining scrap, perthe EAF PTI. Total emissions are (9.91+0.868+2.732) * 0.473 PM10 fraction 

## = 6.39 tons/yr. Strauss Industries operates 8 hours perday. 24 houremissions 

## = 6.39 * 2000 / (0.33*8760) 

## = 4.4209 Ib/hr 

# ( (

(



# c

Annual emissions

# =6.39 * 2000 / 8760

# = 1.4589 Iblhr



# ( (



### (

(



## l



## Appendix B.2, Page 4 ·of 4 (

# (



# c( APPENDIX B.3 PM10 

## ALLOWABLE EMISSION CALCULATIONS FOR YEAR 2005 PLAN FOR FOLLANSBEE FACILITIES

# (



# (



# ( Follansbee Emissions Summary Allowable PM10 (Ib/hr) 24·Hour Annual a. Charging Bat. 1,2&3 0.59 0.14 Battery 8 0.33 0.08 b. DoorLeaks Bat,1,2&3 4.29 0.30 Battery 8 4.42 0.44 c. Topside Leaks Bat. 1,2&3 1.17 0.28 Battery 8 0.99 0.24 d. Stacks Bat.1,2&3 4.21 4.21 Battery 8 7.31 7.31 e.1. Pushing
- Controlled Bat. 1,2&3 2.30 2.30 Battery 8 0.51 0.51 e.2. Pushing Fugiti\es Bat. 1,2&3 1.69 1.69 Battery 8 5.32 5.32 

## f. Quenching Bat. 1,2&3 3.60 3.60 Battery 8 5.65 5.65 g. Boilers 4.97 4.97 h. Coal Crushing 0.51 0.34 i. Coal Handling 0.11 0.11 j. Storage Piles 0.45 0.45 k. Coke Size & Screen 1.51 1.51 

## I. Portable Coke Screen 1.51 0.34 1 

## m. Murphy Coke Breeze 1.24 0.22 2 

## n. Coke O\en Gas Flare 0.10 0.06 o. Roads 4.65 3.22 p. ArrowTerminal 4.18 2.20 

# q. Diesel Generator 0.06 0.00 r. Diesel AirCompressor 0.04 0.00 3 

## TOTALS 61.71 45.51

1. Portable Coke Screen is operated by Oxbow underseparate

# WV DEP.permit. 2. Murphy operates coke screening plant underseparate litleV permit. 3. Diesel Air Compressor-permitrequested

AppendixB.3 

## ,Page 1 of 

## 19

### Operating Parameters: Batteries: Throughput Tons of coal Uncontrolled 

### No. of 

### No. of tons coaVhr percharge Ovens Doors Lids Offtakes



# . Battery 1 31.6 12.3 47 47 188 47 Battery 2 31.6 12.3 47 47 188 47 Battery 3 34.0 12.3 51 51 204 51 Battery8 152.6 34.0 79 158 316 158 Battery Stacks: I'v1axirnum I'v1axirnum Coke to sizing 

### &screening : FIring Rate Row Rate 330 ton/hr 

### CFH DSCFM· Battery 1 160,000 22,373 Excess COG Vent: Battery 2 160,000 22,373 

# odscfm Battery 3 180,000 25,170 Shutdown in 1995 Battery 8 868,700 121,480 The stackflow forBattery 1 was found to be22,373 DSCFMduring astacktest run 3/25/82

### with a COG firing rate of 158,000 CFH, fairly closetothe rated capacity of 160,00OCFH. Flow rates forthe rermining stacks were found using a ratio of rated firing rates x the rreasured stackflow for Battery 1.
Storage Piles : Sinter PlanfData: Area SiltChntent StackFlow acres 

### %

DSCFM Chal Storage 1 4.70 5.0 'Windbox 0 Chal Storage2 4.70 5.0 Discharge 0 Chke Storage2 1.27 5.0 Shutdown in 1999 Flue Dust 0.45 18.0
p= 150 days F= 5.0 

### % Boilers: Material Handling: Heaflnput Throughput M:listure MMBtu/hr tons/hr 

### Chntent

### % Boiler6 90.0 Coal to Crusher 500 7.5 Boiler7 90.0 Chalto Bal. Bin 365 7.5 Boiler8 85.0 Chalto Stockpile 365 7.5 Boiler9 98.0 ChalTrack I-bpper 365 7.5 Boiler 10 98.0 Portable Chke Screen 100 6.5 fv1eanWind Speed = 6.19 rrph

..



## AppendixB.3,Page 2 of 19 ( 

# (

(



### (

(


# ( (

(



### (

# ( a.Charging Battery NO.1 

## = JEFFINAL Model Source 3401 Battery No.2 

## = JEFFINAL Model Source 3402 Battery No.3 

## = JEFFINAL Model Source 3403 Battery No.8 

## = JEFFINAL Model Source,3404 EMISSION RATE FOR24-HOUR MODELING PERIOD Battery Throughput Tons ofcoal TSP Emissions 1 

### PM10 2 

### Number tonlhr percharge Ib/hr Ib/hr 1 31.6 12.3 0.2551 0.1903 2 31.6 12.3 0.2551 0.1903

- 

### 3 34.0

.. 

### 12.3 0.2744 0.2047

8 152.6 34.0 0.4456 0.3324 

# TOTALS 1.2302 0.9177 EMISSION RATE FORANNUAL MODELING PERIOD Battery Throughput Tons ofcoal TSP Emissions 3 

### PM10 2 

### Number tonlhr percharge Ib/hr Ib/hr 1 31.6 12.3 0.0589 0.0440 2 31.6 12.3 0.0589 0.0440 3 34.0 12.3 0.0634 0.0473 

## 8 152.6 34.0 0.1030 0.0768 

# TOTALS 0.2843 0.2121
1. 8Tlssion Factorof IbTSP/charge is derived fromEPA 450/3-85-028a Coke Oven Enissions Background Inforrration for A"oposed Standards, Table 7-1 ForAllowables, using 25 s/charge : Allowables (Kg) MnirrurnBSG/charge = (Average 

### s/charge) * 0.006 = 0.00015 MaxirrurnBSG/charge = (Averages/charge/300)A2 * 7,500 = 0.05208 Average BSG/charge = ( Mnirrum

### +Maxirrum)/2 = 0.02612 Particulate sarrples= 58 

### % tar per George Czerniakof U.S. EPA Region V,Jan 14, 1993, rerrark#2.
2. FM10fraction : 

### 0.746 per George Czerniakof U.S. EPA Region V, Jan 14,1993, rerrark#2.
3. Enission Factorof IbTSPlcharge is derived fromEPA 450/3-85-028a Coke OvenBTissions Background Inforrration for A"oposed Standards, Table 7-1 ForAllowables, using 12s/charge: Allowabies (Kg) MnirrurnBSG/charge = (Average s/charge) * 0.006 = 0.00007 MaxirrurnBSG/charge = (Average s/chargel300)A2 *7,500 = 0.01200 Average BSG/charge = ( Mnirrum

### + Maxirrum)/2 = 0.00604 Particulate sarrples= 58 

### % tar per George Czerniakof U.S. EPA Region V, Jan 14, 1993, rerrark#2. 12secondS percharge is LAER, Extended Track



## Appendix B.3,Page30f 19

### b. Door leaks Battery No.1 

# = JEFFINAL Model Source 3405 Battery NO.2

# =JEFFINAL Model Source 3406 Battery No.3

# =JEFFINAL Model Source 3407 Battery No.8 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3408 EMISSION RATE FOR 24-HOURMODELING PERIOD No. of % 1 2 2 2 

### TSP 3 

### PM 10 4 

### Battery Uncontroll Leaking Minimum kg Maximum kg A\erage kg Emissions Emissions Number Doors Doors BSO/hr/leak BSO/hr/leak BSO/hr/leak Ib/hr Ib/hr 1**1----4:-=7~+-""':'1~0.-=-6-+--:0:-.0:::-1:-:1~2-t--0:::-.~12~54~-t---=0-::. 0-=-68'::":3:--i---'7"1.-=-29::-::3:'::3--;----=1-::.2~5-=-5**  --I 

### 2 47 10.6 0.0112 0.1254 0.0683 1.2933 1.255 3 51 11.8 0.0132 0.1473 0.0802 1.8349 1.780 8 158 10.8 0.0115 0.1290 0.0702 4.5557 4.419 TOTALS 8.9772 8.708 EMISSION RATE FORANNUAL MODELING PERIOD No. of 

## % 5 2 2 2

## 1 TSP 3 

### PM 10 4 

### Battery UncontroJlec 

### Leaking Minimum kg Maximum kg A\eragekg Emissions Emissions Number Doors Doors BSO/hr/leak BSO/hr/leak BSO/hr/leak Ib/hr Iblhr 1**1----4:'::7~+-~3."='8-+-~0:-;0'::":0~2""':'4--;--0:::-.~02~6~9-i----:=O--::.0:-:1"":":47=--+--=0.-=0~99~5:--1------=0--::.0~9~7--l** 

### 2 47 3.8 0.0024 0.0269 0.0147 0.0995 0.097 3 51 3.8 0.0024 0.0269 0.0147 0.1080 0.105 8 158 4.3 0.0029 0.0324 0.0176 0.4557 0.442 TOTALS 0.7627 0.740
1. \WViStandaro percent leakingdoors

# =«No. of Doors *0.10)+2) 

### 1

### No. of Doors. A shed covers one side of Batteries 1,2and 3. ,The leaking doors are calculated for Battery

### No. 1 as (47 * .10) + 1 (One doorand nottw0 

### is added because of the shed) 

### = 5.7 doors which is rounded down tofive doors forthe shorttermstandard. The percentleaking doors would then be 5/47= 10.6%. This Sarra logic applies for Batteries 2 and 3. The nurrberof leaking doors for Battery 8would be(158 * .10) + 2 

### = 17.8doors which 

### is rounded down 

## to 17doors for the shortterlTlstandard. The percent leaking doors for Battery 8 would then be 17/158

# = 10.8 

### %.
2. Enission Factorof IbTSP/hr/doorleakis derived from e'A 450/3-85-028a Coke Oven Enissions Background Inforrration for

A"oposed Standards, Table 7-2 USing Allowable R.DforAverage R.D : MnirrumBSO/hrlleak

# = (AverageA...DI70)A1.5 * 0.19 (kg) MaxirrumBSO/hrlleak

# =11.2 * Minirrum 

### (kg) 3. Particulate sarn:>les 

### = 58 

### % tar. per George Czerniak, Jan 14, 1993, rerrark#2. TSP

# =(Kg BSO/hr/leak) * (TSP/0.57BSO) *(2.2046IblKg) * 

### No. ofDoors * A..D 4. PM10fraction 

# = 0.97 per George Czerniak, Jan 14, 1993, rerrark#2.
5. LAER,Extended Track



## Appendix B.3,Page 40£19 

# (



# (

( (



### (



### (

(



### (

(

(

(

# ( c. Topside Leaks Battery NO.1 

# =JEFFINAL Model Source 3409 Battery No.2

# =JEFFINAL Model Source 3410 Battery No.3

# =JEFFINAL Model Source 3411 Battery NO.8

# =JEFFINAL Model Source 3412 EMISSION RATE FOR 24-HOUR MODELING PERIOD Battery No. of No. of TSP Emissions 1 

### PM10 2 

### PM10 Emissions Number Lids Ofltakes Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr 1 188 47 0.3899 

### 0.97 0.3782 2 188 47 0.3899 

### 0.97 0.3782 3 204 51 0.4231 

### 0.97 0.4104 8 316 158 1.0194 

### 0.97 0.9888 TOTALS 2.2223 

## 2.1556 EMISSION RATE FORANNUAL MODELING PERIOD Battery No. of No. of TSP Emissions 1 

### PM 10 2 

### PM 10 Emissions Number Lids Ofltakes Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr 1 188 47 0.0949 

### 0:97 0.0920 2 188 47 0.0949 

### 0.97 0.0920 3 204 51 0.1029 

### 0.97 0.0999 8 316 158 0.2505 

### 0.97 0.2430 TOTALS 0.5432 

## 0.5269
1. [(No. of lids 

### * ;02) 

### +(No. ofofftakes 

### * .10)] 

### *(IbTSPlhr)

lbTSPlhr is derived from SlA 450/3-85-028a Coke Oven Brissons Background Inforrration for A"oposed Standards, Table 7-3

. 

### .Average BSe emssion rate

# = 0.01215 kg/hrlleakor 0.0268 Ib/hrlleak. 'Particulate samples are 58% tar. TSPIb/hr

# = 0,0268/.58

# = 0.046 Ib/hr
2. AP-42Table B.2-2, Category 9.
3. LAER, Extended Track

### is 0.47% leaking lids and 2.5% leaking offtakes.



# AppendixB.3, Page 5 of 19

## d. Battery Stacks Battery No.1 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3413 Battery No.2 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3414 Battery NO.3 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3415 Battery NO.8 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3416 Actuals Maximum Maximum TSP 1 

### PM 10 2 

### PM 10 Battery Firing Rate Flow Rate Emissions Fraction Emissions Number CFH DSCFM Ib/hr Ib/hr 1 160,000 22,373 1.124 0.959 1.078 2 160,000 22,373 1.124 0.959 1.078 3 180,000 25,170 1.264 0.959 1.212 8 868,700 121,480 6.102 0.959 5.852 TOTALS 9.614 9.219 Allowables 3



### Battery ITSP Emissions PM 10 Emissions Number Ib/hr Ib/hr 1 1.405 1.347 2 1.405 1.347 3 1.580 1.516 8 7.627 7.314 TOTALS 12.017 11.524
1. (0.00586

### gr/DSCF)

### * (Max. 

### DSCFM)

## *(60 rrinlhr) 

### *(lb17000 gr) 

### 03116/82StackTest
2. AP-42 Table**12.2~4** 3. Allowabies

# =1.25x Actuals



## AppendixB. 3, Page 6 of 19 ( 

# ( (

(



### (



### (


# ( (

(

(

# (



# ( e.1. Pushing· Controlled Battery Nos. 1,2& 3 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3417 Battery NO.8 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3418 Battery Tons ofcoke TSP Emissions Throughput TSP Emissions 3 

### PM 10 PM 10 Emissions Number perpush Ib/push tons coke/hr Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr

1,2&3 8.0 0.271 1 

### 68.0 2.304 1 4 

### 2.304

8 22.0 0.121 2,6 

### 106.8 0.587 0.87 5 

### 0.511 Total 2.891 2.815
1. 0.271Ib/push based on07/19/82 StackTest, pushing and cokeside doors
2. 0.121 Ib/push based on 

### 08130/82 StackTest
3. «Throughputtonslhr) / (Tons/push» * (TSP Ib/push)
4. Assurre 100% of TSPis PM10.
5. AP-42 Table 12.2-3
6. New fans and larger motors becarre operational on BatteryNurrber 8 pushing emissions control system

on June 20,2005 whichwDl result inbettercapture ofpushing emissions



### e.2. .Pushing·Fugitives Battery Nos. 1,2 &3= JEFFINALModel Source xxxx Battery No.8

# =JEFFINAL Model Source xxxx Battery Throughput TSP Emissions 1 

### Hood TSP Emissions 2 

### PM10 3 

### PM10 Emissions 4.5 

### Number tons coke/hr Ib/ton ofcoke Loss (%) Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr 1 22.1 1.15 5% 1.271 0.433 0.550 2 22.1 1.15 5% 1.271 0.433 0.550 3 23.8 1.15 5% 1.369 0.433 0.593 8 106.8 1.15 10% 12.282 0.433 5.318 6 

### TOTALS 16.192 7,011
1. AP-42 Table 12.2-2 Uncontrolled Coke Pushing
2. (Throughputtons/hr) 

### * (TSPlb/ton) 

### * (Hood Loss)
3. AP-42 Table 12.2-3 Uncontrolled Coke Pushing
4. Aliowables=Actuals 

### 5. EngineeringjUdgerrent includes·coke side doors undershed.
6. New fans and larger motors becarre operational on Battery Nurrber 8 pushing emissions control system

on June 20,2005 which wDi result in better capture of pushing emissions


# Appendix B.3, Page 70f 19

### f. Quenching Battery Nos. 1,2 &3 

### = JEFFINAL Model Source 3419 Battery No.8

# = JEFFINALModel Source 3420 Quench TSP Emission 1 

### Throughput TSP Emissions PM10 Emission 2 

### PM10 Emissions 2 

### Tower Factor Ib/ton tons/hr Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr Batteries 1,2 & 3 0.54 68.0 36.720 0.098 3.599 Battery 8 0.54 106.8 57.672 ·0.098 5.652 TOTALS 

### 94.392 9.250
1. AP-42 Table 12.2-2 2. AP-42 Table 12.2-3 3. Allowables 

### =Actuals


## g.Boilers JEFFINAL Model Source 3423 Boiler Heat Input Fuel Emission Factor 1 

## TSP PM10 2 

## PM10 Number MM Btu/hr Type (lb/MMBtu) (Ib/hr) Fraction (Ib/hr) 6 90.0 COG 0.012 1.08 0.959 1.04 7 90.0 COG 0.012 1.08 0.959 1.04 8 85.0 NG 0.0076 0.65 1.000 0.65 9 98.0 COG 0.012 1.18 0.959 1.13 10 98.0 COG 0.012 1.18 0.959 1.13 Totals 

# 5.16 4.97

1. Enission factors fromAP-42 Table 12.5-1
2. PM10 fractions fromAP-42 Table 12.2-4



## AppendixB.3, Page 8 of· 19 

# (



# ( (

(

(



### (

(

(



### (



### (

(

# ( h. Coal Crushing 

## JEFFINAL Model Source 3424 EMISSION RATE FOR 24-HQUR MODELING PERIOD EF

# = Throughput = Uncontrolled TSP : Building Enclosure Control efficiency = ACTUALTSP= 0.02 Ib/ton ofcoal NEDS Sec. 3-05-010-10 500 tons/hr 

## coal WPSC Permit Application 10.001b/hr

90% 1 

## 1.00 Ib/hr PM 10 Fraction = ACTUAL PM 10 = 0.51 0.51 Ib/hr AP-42 Table B.2-10 Category 3 

# ( EMISSION RATE FOR ANNUAL MODELING PERIOD2 TSP = 

## PM 10

# = 0.671b/hr 0.34lb/hr



# ( 1

..The hanmmTiIl thatdoes coal crushing has atop enclosure and the entire mil is enclosed within a building. 2. Operations.are Iimted to

### tw0 

### turns per day. Annualized emssions would be 2/3 

### * 1.00 =0.67Ib/hrforTSPand 2/3 

### *0.51 = O.34Ib/hrfor PM10.



# Appendix B.3, Page90f 19

### i. 

## Coal Handling Balancing BinTrans = JEFFINAL Model Source 3425 Trans to Stockpile

# = JEFFINAL Model Source 3426 Track Hopper= JEFFINAL Model Source 3427 

# ( (

(



### Process Balancing Bin Trans 4



### Trans to Stockpile

Track Hopper 4 

# TOTALS Throughput TSP Emission tons/hr Factor Ib/ton 500,0 0.00005 365,0 0.00050 365.0 0.00005 1 

### TSP Emissions 2 

### PM10 Emissions 3,5 

### Ib/hr Ib/hr 0.025 0,0116 0.183 0.0863 0.018 0.0085 

## 0.225 0.1064
1. AP-42 13.2.4-3

E = 1«0,0032)* 

### {(l.V5)**1.3/(M/2)**1.4} Where k =0,74 forTSP k= 0,35 for

### PM 10 

### U= Mean Wind Speed 6.19 M= M>isture Content = 7.5 rrph 

### %for coal 

### (

2. (ThroughpuUons/hr)* (Errission Factor

### Ib/ton) 3. (Throughputtons/hr) * (Errission Factor.lbIton) * 

### (0.35/0.74) 4. Balancing Bin transfers occur in sealed buildingw ithan assumed control eficiencyof 90 

### %. 5, AlioWables 

# =Actuals 

## j.Storage Piles Coal Storage 1 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3428 Coal Storage 2= JEFFINAL ModelSource 3429 Coke Storage 2 = JEFFINALModel Source 3432 FlueDust

# =JEFFINAL Model Source 3433 Silt TSP Emission TSP 2 3 

### PM10 Storage Area Content Factor 1 

### Emissions PM 10 Emissons

Pile acres % I

## b/day/acre Ib/hr Fraction Ib/hr Coal Storage 1 4.70 5.00 1.73 !i 

### 0.338 0.51 0.173 Coal Storage 2 4.70 5.00 1.73 0.338 0.51 0.173 Coke Storage 2 1.27 5.00 1.73 0.091 0.51 0.047 Flue Dust 0.45 18.00 6.22 0.117 0.51 0.059 

# ( (

(

(



# TOTALS 1, AP-42 11.2.3-3 rev. 

### 9/88



### E= 1,7* (s/1.5) * ((365-P)/235) * (F/15) Where P= 150 

### F

# =5,0 2. (Area acres) * (Errission Factor 

### Ib/day/acre) * 

### (day/24hr) 3, AP-42.Table B.2-2 Category 3 

## 0.885 0.451

4. Sinterprocesses are discontinued with sinter plantshutdown in 1999, butsome rawrraterials are still stored in the south yard; 

## AppendixB.3, Page 10 of 19 (

# ( k. Coke Sizing & Screening 1&2 

# Coke Sizing & 

# Screening 1 =JEFFINAL Model Source 3430 Coke Sizing & 

# Screening 2 = JEFFINAL Model Source 3431

EF

# = Throughput = 0.09 Ib/ton ofcoke NEDS Factor 

# 165.0 

# tons/hrcoke each WPSC Permit Application Uncontrolled TSP = ·14.85Ib/hr each Building Enclosure Control Efficiency = 90% ACTUALTSP 1 = ACTUAL TSP 2 = PM 10 Fraction = ACTUAL PM10 1 = ACTUAL PM10 2 = TOTALS 

# 1A91b/hr 1.49 Ib/hr 0.51 0.761b/hr 0.761b/hr 1.51 Ib/hr Source 3430 Source 3431 AP-42 Table B.2-2 Category 3 Source 3430 Source 3431

AppendixB.3,Page 11 of 19

### I. Portable Coke Screen operated by Oxbow Carbon 

### & Minerals, LLC EMISSION RATE FOR 24

..HOUR MODELING PERIOD Process 1 

### Throughput TSP Emission TSP Emissions 4 

### PM10 Emissions 4 

### tons/hr Factor Ib/ton Ib/hr Ib/hr Front end loadergrizzly 100.0 0.00005 2 

### 0.005 0.0023 Grizzly tocon\leyor 100.0 0.00005 2 

### 0.005 0.0023 Con\leyorto screen 100.0 0.00005 2 

### 0.005 0.0023 Screening 100.0 0.03150 3 

### 3.150 1.5000 Screen to loading con\leyororsmall pile 100.0 0.00005 2 

### 0.005 0.0023 TOTALS 3.170 1.5093 EMISSION RATE FORANNUAL MODELING PERIOD Process 1 

### Throughput 5 

### TSP Emission TSP Emissions 4 

### PM 10**Emission~** 4 

### tons/hr Factor Ib/ton Ib/hr Ib/hr Front end.loadergrizzly 22.8 0.00005 2 

### 0.001 0.0005 Grizzly to con\leyor 22.8 0.00005 2 

### 0.001 0.0005 Con\leyortoscreen 22.8 0.00005 2 

### 0.001 0.0005 Screening 22.8 0.03150 3 

### 0.718 0.3420 Screen to loading con\leyororsmall pile 22.8 0.00005 2 

### 0.001 0.0005 TOTALS 0.723 0.3441 1. FromWPSC FAXofJan. 4, 2000. 

### No controls on any process.**2.A~42** Table 13.2.4-3

E= k(0.0032) " {(U/5)**1.31 (M'2)**1.4} Where k =0.74 forTSP

k=0.35 for PM 10 U = Mean Wind Speed = 6.19 rrph M = Ivbisture Content= 6.5 %for coke 3.**A~42** Table 11.19.2-2 PM10= 0.015 Iblton processed TSP= 0.0315 Iblton processed 4. (Throughputtons/hr) " (Errission Factor lbIton) 5. Hourly rate based on annual throughputof 200,000tons.



## Appendix B.3,Page .12 

## of 19 

## ( (

(

(



### (

(

(

(



### (



### l

# (



# ( m. Murphy Throughput

# = 125 tons per hourperplant, 100,000 tons peryear per plant 

# g plants 

### Coke Handling: AP-42 13.2.4, EF 

### = (k)(0.0032) [(U/5)"1.3 

### I (M/2)"1.4] Moisture content

# = 6.5 % from 

### 10/26/97Application Average wind speed 

## = 6.19 mph k TSP 

### = 0.74 k PM10 =0.35 EF (TSP) 

### = (k)(0.0032) 

### [(U/5)"1.31 (M/2)"1.4] 

### = 0.0006 Ib/ton EF (PM10)

# = 0.00028 Ib/ton Drop points: 

# 1 Truck to stockpile 

# 1 To screening station by front loader 

# 1 Screening station to conveyor 1 

# 1 Conveyor 1 to conveyor2 

# 1 Conveyor2 to conveyor3 

# 1 Conveyor3 to stockpile 

# 1 Totruck or railcarby frontloader 7 Total No controls Hourly TSP from coke handling:

. Tons/hourper plant 

## * no. plants 

## * EF, Ib/ton 

## * no. ofdrop points 

### = 1.05 IbTSP/hour Yearly TSP from coke handling: Tons/year per plant 

## * no. plants 

## * EF, Ib/ten* no. ofdrop points * ton/2000 

### Ib

### = 0.42 tons TSP/year Hourly PM10.from coke handling: Tons/hour per plant * no. plants * EF, Ib/ton * no. ofdrop points 

### = 0.50 Ib PM10/hour Yearly PM10 from coke handling: Tons/yearper plant* no. plants * EF, Ib/ton * no. ofdrop points * ton/2000 

### Ib

# = 0.20 tons PM1O/year 

### Coke Screening: AIRS Emission Factor EF (PM10) 

## = 0.04 Ib/ton ofceke processed EF (TSP) 

### = 0.09 Ib/ton ofcoke processed Full Enclosure,· 99 

## %.efficiency Hourty TSP from coke screening: Tons/hour per plant * no. plants * EF, Ib/ton * efficiency 

### = 0.21 .IbTSP/hour YeartyTSP from coke screening: Tons/yearper plant* no. plants *EF, Ib/ten * ton/2000 

### Ib 

### = 0.08 tons TSP/year Hourty PM10from coke screening: Tons/hour per plant * no. plants * EF, Ib/tan * efficiency 

### = 0.10 Ib PM10/hour Yearty PM10from coke screening: Tons/year

### perplant* no. plants * EF, Ib/ton * ton/2000 Ib

# = 0.04 tons PM10/year



## AppendixB.3, Page 13.of19

### m. Murphy (Continued) ( Coke Storage Piles (Wind Erosion): AP-42 11.2.3-3 

### rev.9/88, EF (TSP) = 1.7 * 

### (s/1.5) * ((365-P)/365) * 

### (F/15) Silt content = 5 % Days peryearwith precipitation: 150 F= 5 EF (TSP) = 1.7* 

### (s/1.5) * 

### ((365-P)/365) * 

### (F/15) = 3.34 

### Ib/daylacre EF (PM10) = EF (TSP) 

### 12 = 1.67 

### Ib/daylacre Storage Piles = 

## QJ. acres (

( 

### Hourly TSP from coke storage: Storagepile area (acres) * EF(lb/daylacre) * day/24hr= 0.01 IbTSP/hour Yearly TSP from coke storage: Storage pile area (acres) * EF(lb/day/acre) * 365 

### days/year* ton/20001b = 0.06 tons 

### TSP/year Roads: AP-42 13.2.2 Unpaved Roads EF = k * 5.9 

### *(s/12) * 

### (S/30) * 

### rN/3)"fJ.7* 

### (w/4)"fJ.5 ((365-p)/365) =lbNMT ForTSP, k= 0.80 For PM10, k= 0.36 s = Surfacesilt content 6.0 %, mean for Iron & 

### Steel S

# =Mean vehicle speed 

## § mph 

### W= Mean vehicle weight 50.5 ton, estimated w = Mean numberofwheels pervehicle 4 p =Days peryearwith precipitation 150 EF(TSP) = 1.67 Ib/vehicle miletraveled EF'(PM10) 

### = 0.75 Ib/vehicle mile traveled Control Efficiency,.Control ofOpen Fugitive Dust Sources, p. 3.3-1 C =100-(0.8*p*d*t/i) = %>control p =potential average hourly daytime evaporation rate 0.26 

### mm/h (summer months) d = average hourly daytimetraffic rate 

# 1 t =time between applications 

# 1 hours 

### I = application intensity 0.030 

## Umll 

## 2 C

# =100-(0.8*p*d*tli) = 72.3 % control Truck Mileage = 6250 miles peryear An estimated 100 

### % ofvehicle miles traveled occuron the plant Hourly TSP from roads: VMT peryear* percentoftravel inside plant * EF(lbNMD * control efficiency * 

### year/2080 hours =

1.391bTSP/hour Yearly TSPfrom roads: VMTperyear* percent oftravel inside plant * EFQbNMD * control efficiency * 

### ton/2000 Ib

# =

1.45 tons 

### TSP/year Hourly PM10 from roads: VMT peryear* percent oftravel inside plant * EF(lbNMD * control efficiency * 

### year/2080 hours

# = 0.63 Ib PM10/hour Yearly PM10 from roads: VMT peryear* percent oftravel inside plant * EF(lbNMD *.control efficiency *

### ton/2000 Ib

# = 0.65 tons 

### PM10lyear TOTALS Hourly PM10 = 1.24 Ib/hour Yearly PM10 = 0.95 

### tons/yr= 0.22 Ib/hr 

## Appendix B. 3 I 

## Page 14. 

## of 19 

# ( (



### (



### (

(

(

(

(

# (



# ( n. Coke Oven Gas Flare Newsource- not in JEFFINAL·Model Im.entory EMISSION RATE FOR24-HOURIvODalNG PERIOD 

### COG Throughput

# = 21.00 MMCF/day Heat Content 

# = 568.00 Btu/CF Maximum heat content in last sewral years



# -- Emission Factor

# = 0.012 Ib/MM Btu AP-42 Table 12.5-1 TSP 

# = 5.96lb/hr PM10 Fraction 

# = 0.959 PM 10 

# = 5.72lb/hr

EMISSION RATEFORANNUAL IvODaING PERIOD 

### COG Throughput

# = Z:.! MMCF/Day annualized Heat Content 

# = 568.00 Btu/CF Maximum heat content inlast se\eral years Emission Factor

# = 0.0121b/MMBtu AP-42 Table 12.5-1 TSP 

# = 2.021b/hr PM10 Fraction 

# = 0.959 PM 10 

# = 1.931b/hr



# AppendixB.3 Page 15 of 19(



### o. Roads and Parking Lots 

# ( Road Controlled Section Emissions (Ib/hr) 24-Hour 1 

### Annual 2 

### Paved

A 0.0570 0.0570 

### B 0.1606 0.1606 ( 

### C 0.0062 0.0062 

### G 0.0679 0.0679 H 0.4862 0.4862 

### I 0.3377 0.3377 

### Q 0.0496 0.0496 S 0.0462 0.0462 

### ( U1 0.0424 0.0424 U2 0.1213 0.1213 P-1 0.0019 0.0019 Unpaved 

### D 0.1705 0.0963 

### E 0.0319 0.0180 ( 

### F 0.0799 0.0452 

### I 0.0538 0.0304 

### J 0.0781 0.0442 

### K 0.1379 0.0779 

### L 0.2197 0.1242 

### M 0.0565 0.0320 ( 

### N 0.0643 0.0364 

# ( 0 0.0071 0.0040 Q 

### 0.1786 0.1009 R 0.1235 0.0698 

### T 1.1858 0.6702 

### V 0.0545 0.0308 

### X 0.2847 0.1609 ( Y 0.2891 0.1634 

### Z 0.1306 0.0738 

### AA&AB 0.0786 0.0444



### AC 0.0193 0.0109 P-2 0.0165 0;0093 P-3 0.0006 0.0003 P-4 0.0017 0.0010

1 0.0005 0.0003 2 0.0004 0.0002 3 0.0008 0.0005 

### 4 0.0011 0.0006 5 0.0031 0.0018 ( 

### TOTAL 4.6459 3.2246 1. 24-Hourerrissions.fromAppendix C 2. Annual errissions are calculated for paved and unpaved roads

separately. Paved road 24-hourenissions retained as annual. Unpavedroad annualenissions are Influenced bythe nurrber of rain days (148 peryear); Unpaved annual enissions are ( calculated as Unpaved 24-hour· (1-(148/365» or59% of the Unpaved 24-hourvalues.


## Appendix B.3, Page 16 

## of .19

# ( p.Arrow Terminal

MaterialsHandling Method

Camfrombilrgetobin, no control Bin to truck, 3-slded doghouse TruckdUrrpto pUe, nocontrol Front loaderto raUcar, nocontrol EMISSION RATE FOR24-HOUR MODELING PERIOD M 3 1 TSP 2 TSP PM10 Moisture Throughput Control EF Emissions Emissions content (%) (tons/hr) Efficiency (%) (Ib/ton) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 2.0 500.0 0 0.0031 1.5627 0.7391 2.0 500.0 75 0.0031 0.3907 0.1848 2.0 500.0 0 0.0031 1.5627 0.7391 2.0 500.0 0 0.0031 1.5627 0.7391 5.0789 2.4022



# ( Vehicle emissions, unpaved roads 

### a== k [(s/12)Aa * (W/3jAb] I [(M'0.2)AC] * [(S/15)] * [(365-p)/365]AF42, p. 13.2.2-3 (Rev. 9/98) Where: k = 2.6 forFMl0 W = tons vehicleweighterrpty a= 0.8 for FMl0 tons vehicleweightfiled b = 0.4 for FMl0 M= % surface rmterlal rroisturecontent c = 0.3 for FMl0 5 = 10 rrph averagevehicle speed s = § %sitcontent of road p = 0 days of0.01" precipitation peryear 

### a== 2.5820 IbNMT Vehicle mles traveled on unpaved road: Road length = 0.233 niles oneway 500.0 tonslhour I 25 tonsnoad = 20.0 trips/hour VMT= 4.66 perhouroncefull and once errpty With chenical dustsuppression application every2 weeks foran 94% control efficiency: Vehicle Errissions : 2.5820 IbNMT * 4.66 VMTlhr* 2passes * (1-0.94) = 1.44 Ib/hr Vehicle emissions, paved roads

EF=O.n(sU.35)A.3 Where: sL= 0.554 g1m'2**si~loadingperpavedroadsweepingprogram** 

### a== 0.3081 IbNMT Vehicle rriles traveled on paved road: VMT= Road length = 0.246 niles oneway 500.0 tons/hour I 25 tonsnoad = 20.0 tripslhour 4.91 per houroncefun and onceerrpty Vehicle Enissions : 0.3081 IbNMT * 4.91 VMTlhr*2passes * (1-0.89) = 0.33 Iblhr Storage Wind erosion

Afl.42 11.2.3-3 rev. 9/88 E= 1.7* (s/1.5) * «365-Pl/235) * (F/15) = 0.069. LbJ'M'day/acre Where p= 150 F= 5.0 % s 

## = 0.2 % Area ofstorage = 0.25 acres FM Ibslhr. = (Areaacres)*(Enission Factor LbJday/acre)*(dayI24) = 0.0007 Iblhr FMl0lbslhr. = FMl0factorbased on ratio ofbatchdrop particles size**rnu~IpUers** fromTable 11.2.3-2. (0.35/0.74=0.47) = FMto FMl0 conversionfactor. FMl0lbslhr. = 0.00034 Total PM10Emissions

### = 4.181b/hr



## Appendix B.3, Page 17 of 

## 19p. Arrow Terminal (Continued) (

EMISSION RATE FOR ANNUAL MODELING PERIOD 

### C M TSP PM10 Materials Handling Method Moisture 3 Throughput 1 Control TSP EF 2 Emissions Emissions content('Yo) (tons/hr) Efficiency ('Yo) (Ib/ton) (Ib/hr) Qb/hr) Camfrombargeto bin, nocontrol 2.0 210.0 0 0.0031 0.6565 0.3105 Bintotruck, 3-s!ded doghouse 2.0 210.0 75 0.0031 0.1641 0.On6 Truckdurrpto pOe, nocontrol 2.0 210.0 0 0.0031 0.6565 0.3105 

### ( Frontloaderto reHcar, nocontrol 2.0 210.0 0 0.0031 0.6565 0.3105 2.1336 1.0091 Vehicle emissions, unpaved roads EF= k [(s/12)"a * (W/3)"b] I [(M'0.2)"c] * [(5115)) * [(365-p)/365] AP-42, 

### p. 13.2.2-3 (Rev. 9/98) Where: k=**~forFM10** W= tons vehicleweight errpty a = 

### M for PM10 tons vehicleweightfiled b = '0.4 for FM10 M= 0.2 % surface material rrolsture content c = Q1 for PM10 S = 10rrphaveragevehiclespeed s = 

### !! % sitcontentof road p = 148 days of0.01" precipitation peryear EF= 1.5351 IbNMT Vehicle rriles traveled on unpaved road: Road length = 0.233 rriles one Way 500.0 tonslhour ,I 25 tonslload = 20.0 tripslhour VMT= 4.66 perhouroncefull and onceerrpty With chemicaldustsuppression application every2weeks foran 94%control efficiency: Vehicle Errissions : 1.5351 IbNMT * 4.66 VMTlhr*2passes *(1-0.94)= 0.86 Ib/hr 

### (

(

Vehicle emissions, paved roads

EF=O.77(sU.35)".3 Where: sL= 0.554 glm"2 sill loading perpaved road sweeping program EF= 0.3081 IbNMT Vehicle nilestraveled on paved road: VMT= Road length = 0.246 rrilesoneway 500.0 tons/hour I 25 tonsnoad = 20.0 tripslhour 4.Q1 perhouroncefun and onceerrpty 

# ( (

Vehicle Errissions : 0.3081 IbNMT * 4.91' VMTlhr*2passes *(1-0.89)= 0.33 Iblhr Storage Wind Erosion

AP-42 11.2.3-3rev. 9/88 E= 1.7* (s/1.5)* ((365-Pj/235) * (F/15) = 0.069 Lb.RvVdaylacre Where P= 150 F= 5.0 % 

### s 

# = 0.2 % Areaofstorage =. 0.25 acres PMIbs/hr. = (Areaacres)*(Errission Factor Lb.ldaylacre)*(day/24) = 0.0007 Iblhr FM1 0Ibslhr=PM10factorbased on ratio of batch drop particles size ITUltipliersfromTable 11.2.3-2. (0.35/0.74=0.47) =PMto PM10conversion factor. PM10 Ibslhr. = 0.00034 Annual PM10tonslyear = Ib.lhr. *8760 Iblyear I 2000lb.lton 

# = 0.001 Iblhr 

### (

(

Total PM10 emissions

### = 2.201b/hr 1. Throughput 500.0 tonslhour

Forannualizedthroughput: 1,840,000 tpyl876 210.0457 tonslhour 2. EF

### =(k)(.0032)(LV5)**1.3/(M'2)"1.4 AP-42 13.2.4

3. Moisturecontent fromWPSCPerrrilApplication U= kTSP= kPM10= 6.19 rrph 0.74 0.35 (

(



## Appendix B.3, Page 18 of 19 (

# (



# (

(

" 

# q. Diesel Generator WPSC installed 

## a diesel powered emergency generatoremitting 25.5 grams/hour or 

# 0.056 Ib/hour, 24 hour modeling rate The generatorwill. run no more than 500 hours/year, 

# 0.003 Ib/hour, annual modeling rate



## r. Diesel Air Compressor WPSC applied fora permit forthis source. 

## PM emissions

# = 0.044 Ib/hrfor24-houfmodleing period PM emissions

# = 0.003 Ib/hrforannual modeling period 

## PM emissions based on manufacturer's data



## Appendix E.3, Page 19 of 19

# (



# (

( APPENDIX C ROAD CONTROL PROGRAM FOR WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION MINGO JUNCTION FACILITY, STEUBENVILLE FACILITY AND FOLLANSBEE FACILITY

# (



# (

( This document presents a .reviseddust suppression program required

. to meet the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the WheelingPittsburgh Steel Corporation (WPSC) facilities at Mingo Junction and Steubenville, Ohio and Follansbee, West Virginia. The US EPA supplied program, MECH@X@Y, was used to develop the control program for the initial year for unpaved roads. As shown in Appendix C.2, the following years should be controlled through a separate EPA document ("Control of Open Fugitive Dust Sources," September 1988)
. Roads and parking lots are presented in Figure 1 for the Mingo Junction Facility, in Figure 2 for the Steubenville Facility and in Figures 3.1 and 3.2 for the Follansbee**Facility~** 

## Controls for the paved and uhpaved roads are presented as follows:
PAVED ROADS
Traffic counts were conducted at WPSC in 1983. An origindestination analysis was used to update the traffic patterns at Mingo Junction to reflect the maximum steel production of 10,000 tons per day. Similarly, the Steubenville traffic was updated to reflect increased production. Traffic counts were updated in 1998 at the Follansbee facility because of revisions to traffic flow. The paved roads were treated as industrial paved roads for purposes of calculating PMlO 

## emissions.
Paved road silt loading was developed from testing done in 1993 at the Mingo Junction facility using a TYMCO Regenerative Air Sweeper. Results from the last day of sweeping· were used to develop the estimate. The first three of the eight test sites from Table C-3 of E2

## M-640-93 had been swept by the TYMCO on the previous day. The silt loading prior to the TYMCO pass was 0.95 grams/m2 

## at these three sites. The silt loading after the TYMCO pass was 0.22 grams/m2 • 

## Silt loading is assumed to increase linearly between the

APPENDIX C, Page C-1

## sweeping events. Since emissions are related to the 0.8 power of silt loading for vehicles less than 4.4 tons and to the 0.3 power of silt loading for vehicles over 4.4 tons, emissions do not follow a straight average of the two silt loading values for a daily average. Instead, emissions were calculated for each hour. Those values are summarized in Table C-1. As shown in Table C-1, the paved road emissions increased between sweeping events. Additional testing was done in 1998 on a Schwartz sweeper. The Schwartz sweeper met the performance value achieved by the" TYMCO Sweeper. The TYMCO sweeper was replaced by the Schwartz equipment in 1998.
For the Mingo Junction facility, paved road PM10 

## hourly emissions increase from 5.0552 pounds per hour after the sweeping event to 7.8447 pounds per hour prior to sweeping again. The mean for the day would be 6.6693 

## pounds per hour. For the Steubenville facility, paved road PM10 

## hourly emissions increase from 1.2626 

## pounds per hour to 1.8681 pounds per hour between sweeping. The mean for the day would be 1.5875 

## pounds per hour. For the Follansbee facility, paved road PM10 

## hourly emissions increase from 1.0429 pounds per hour to 1.6207 pounds per hour between sweeping. The mean for the day would be 1.3769 pounds per hour. Table C-2 shows the worksheet for 0.22 grams/m2
, 

## and Table C-3 shows the worksheet for 0.95 grams/m2 • 

## UNPAVED ROADS Physical parameters for the unpaved roads are listed in Table C-4. Chemical dust suppressant is presented in Tables C-5, C-6 and C-7 for the initial application and in Tables C-8, C-9 and C-10 for the maintenance applications. A summary of the MECH@X@Y output found in" Appendix C.1 

## is presented in Table C-11. These chemical additions are considered for the first year of control program. Follow-up years should follow the guidance in the EPA document

APPENDIX C, Page C-2 

# (



# (

( (

(



### (

(

(



### (

(



### (

(

# (



# (

( "Control of Open Fugitive Dust Sources. tr 

## That follow-on program is identified in TableC-12. Emissions are shown in Table C-13. Chemical applications reflect the experience gained in 1995 by WPSC and the Syntech Company. Some roads require additional chemical applications because of the type of vehicle traffic.
As noted in AppendixC.2, the control program developed by MECH@X@Y is appropriate for the first year of the program. The second year should acknowledge the ground inventory from the prior year. A procedure is suggested in Appendix C. 2 to develop the on-going control program. The follow-on program can be defined using Figure 4, which in association with Appendix C. 2, yields the control values listed in Table C-12. The control factors in Table C-10 were applied to Mingo Junction, Steubenville and Follansbee as shown in Table C-13.
The unpaved road control program was discussed with plant personnel. A summary comparison of the chemical use indicated that some roads had more chemicals used than listed in Tables C-5 and C-8 for the Mingo Junction facility. The slab laydown area requires more applications because the road surface undergoes more wear than the computer program would indicate.
Chemical dust suppression is used on a year-round basis, weather permitting.
TOTAL EMISSIONS
At maximum capacity of the Mingo Junction facility, total fugitive dust emissions from the roads at the suggested control program are:

APPENDIX C, Page C-3

## Paved Roads 6.67 lbs/hr 

# ( Unpaved Roads 0.94 lbs/hr Total 7.61 lbs/hr
At maximum capacity of the Steubenville facility, total fugitive dust emissions from the roads at the suggested control program are: (

(


## Paved Roads 1. 

## 59 lbs/hr Unpaved Roads 0.13 lbs/hr lbs/hr ( 

## Total 1.72
At maximum capacity of the Follansbee facility, total fugitive dust emissions from the roads at the suggested control program are: ( 

## Paved Roads Unpaved Roads Total 1. 

## 38 lbs/hr 3.00 lbs/hr 4.38 lbs/hr 

# ( (



### (

(



## APPENDIX C, Page C-4

# (

Drawin Scale: Code: 

# / / ! .......



### ·······,·.r·······..· ..._....... 

### ..i



### ..... j 

# /

.

500 

# - 

# - o 

# sclfJ' Layout of the Roads at Mingo Facility Energy & 

## Environmental Management, 

## hie. -Paved Road _Paved Lot IIlU"'IIlIl11 

### Unpaved Road

_ Unpaved Lot 

# (

APPENDIX C, Page C-5( 

# (

( (

(



### (



## <-



## l

( 

# (

( .;..

..... 

# /

..........

# ; 

# J

#
. '1/ : 

### fI ; 

### fI

. 

# l 11

1000 

# FEET \ . •.. ....

....



### .......



## Layout of the Roads at the Steubenville Facility Energy & 

## Environmental Management, Inc. 500 

# - - .......

.... 

# ./

# ~t~.u.benyilre

o 

# sc::f' -Paved Road _Paved Lot ,,,.,,,,,"'
...Unpaved Road

_ Unpaved> Lot



## APPENDIX C, Page C-6

# (



# (

at Follansbee Energy & 

### Environmental Management, Inc.



## APPENDIX C, Page C-7

### (

Energy**~.** 

### Environmental Management, Inc. Layout of the. Roads at Follansbee Sinter Plant Area ( (



# c

(

(

(



### ( 

# (



# ( ( /...-.-

..



### , 

## , 2

FEET _Paved Road _Paved Lot PUlIll1llUil!IUnpaved Road**~Unpaved** Lot500 SINTER PLANT



## R 

# :\ \\ 

### \\ 

# \\ \\ 

# \\ \\ \\ 

# \\

\\ 

# \\

\\



# '\ 

# \\**\~** 

# \\ \\ \\ \ \ 

# \\ 

# \\



# \\

\\

APPENDIX C, Page C-8

# (



# (

GROUND INVENTORY 

### (gaIjyd2)


# t-=;:-;_:

__

# ;_;_:_~_-;:~_f::fl:-'c_i-;e:-n_c_ Y _f_o_r-;:-o-:n---:---;G_O_i_n_ g

__

c_o_n-;t:-r_o-;I

__--t!'IfQl!!illl.l1Q!!!lr.;......!!!£k'L-----J Energy & Environxnental Managexnent., Inc.


## APPENDIX C, Page C-9

# TABLE C-l HOURLY PM10 

# EMISSIONS FROM THE PAVED ROADS AFTER DAILY SWEEPING PROGRAM IS UNDERWAY WITH TYMCO SWEEPER
Silt
.PM10 

## Emissions (#/hr) 

## Silt PM10 

## Emissions (#/hr) 

## Loading Mingo Steuben- Loading Mingo SteubenHour (g/m2) 

## Junction ville Follansbee Hour (g/m2) 

## Junction ville Follansbee 1 0.22 5.0552 1.2026 1.0429 13 0
.. 60 6.8329 1.6265 1.4109 :J::l 

## 2 0.25 5.2530 1.2497 1.0838 14 0.63 6.9338 1. 6506 'l:l 

## 1.4318 'l:l 

### !:':I 

## 3 0.28 5.4349 1.2931 1.1214 15 0.66 7.0314 1.6739 1.4520 

# z 0 H 

## 4 0.32 5.6572 1. 3461 1. 1674 16 0.70 7.1568 1.7038 1.4780 :>< 0 

## 5 0.35 5.8115 1.3829 1. 1993
. 17 0.73 7.2476 1.7255 1. 4968



# .. 'l:l 

## 6 0.38 5.9569 1.4175 1.2294 18 0.76 7.3359 1.7466 1.5151 Pi LQ 

## 7 0.41 6.0944 1.4503 1. 2579 19 0.79 7.4217 1. 7671 1. 5329 (1) 

### 0 

## 8 0.44 6.2250 1. 4815 1. 2849 20 0.82 7.5053 1.7870 1. 

## 5503 I I-' 

## 9 0.47 6.3496 1.5112 1.3107 21 0.85 7.5868 1. 8065 1. 5672 0 

## 10 0.51 6.5073 1.5488 1.3434 22 0.89 7.6923 1.8317 1. 5891 11 0.54 6.6200 1. 5757 1.3667 23 0.92 7.7694 1.8501 1.6051 12 0.57 6.7284 1.6016 1.3892 24 0.95 7.8447 1. 

## 8681 1. 

## 6207 24 Hour Mean 6.6693 1. 5875 1. 

## 3769

C"**~,** (' ,-' /""


### ,-. -, 

### ,-, 

## '""" /--"

# (



# ,{ TABLE C-2 WORKSHEET FOR PAVED ROAD SILT LOADING OF 0.22 grams/m2

DallyVehicle Passes I Road EmissIon Rate 

# • Road Description B VehIcleTv 18 Length BvVehIcleTv"" b1hrl Section A B C D E (mO A B C D E Total MinDOJunctlon'Facilltv A Entrance Road 313 57 366 0.5114 1.29E-D3 2.84E-{)1 1.82E+OO 2.1071 B BOF
- Serae Handline Road 151 51 254 0.6003 7.30E-{)4 2.98E-{)1 1.48E+OO 1,7830 0 80" HotStriaMm Road 30 14 130 0.3409 8.24E-{)5 4.65E-{)2 4.31E-{)1 0.4779 E Blast Furnace- LaborOffICe Road 112 0.2288 2.06E-{)4 0.0002 F Center Road Section 4 0.3767 1.21E-{)5 0.0000 G Truck Scale 229 57 366 0.1100 2.03E-{)4 6.10E-{)2 3.92E-{)1 0.4532 I Siao HaulRoad& Berms 48 0.5000 2.34E-{)1 0.2336 L BOF Parkino Lot 10 0.0265 2.14E-{)6 0.0000 U Short Road 5 0.0426 1.72E-{)6 0.0000 BB Office Road 85 0.1136 7.78E-{)5 0.0001 HH ForkTruck Road, oavedsection 27 0.1326 2.88E-{)5 0.0000 KK StriaMill Parkina Lot 27 0.0492 1.07E-{)5 0.0000 Total 5.0552 Steubenville Facilitv A Entrance Road 270 86 74 0.5114 1.11E-D3 4.28E-{)1 3.68E-{)1 0.7976 B ColdStriaMm Road 75 14 74 0,2206 1.33E-{)4 3.01E-{)2 1.59E-{)1 0.1891 C ColdStrinMiD Entrance Road 18 8 11 0.1136 1.85E-{)5 8.85E-D3 1.22E-{)2 0.0210 01 PlantCenter Road North 177 64 19 0.0941 1.34E-{)4 5.86E-{)2 1.74E-{)2 0.0762 02 Plant Center Road South 177 21 19 0.2486 3.52E-{)4 5.05E-{)2 4.56E-{)2 0.0965 Hl PF Environmental Road 2 45 0.0489 7.89E-{)7 2.14E-{)2 0.0214 K Parkino LoL North ofGuard 10 0.0112 9.02E-{)7 0.0000 L Parkina LoLSouth ofGuard 4 0.0205 7.98E-{)4 0.0008 Total 1.2026 Follansbee Facility A Entrance Road 315 29 15 0.1000 2.54E-{)4 2.82E-{)2 1.46E-{)2 0.0431 B Bvoroducts Plant Road 74 39 0.3200 1.91E-{)4 1.21E-{)1 0.1217 C Office Road 11 6 0,0800 7.09E-D6 4.67E-{)3 0.0047 G Plant Center Road 72 66 0.0800 4.64E-{)5 5.14E-{)2 0.0514 H Batterv8 Road 160 90 0.4198 5.41E-{)4 3.68E-{)1 0.3683 I South Entrance 43 11 252 0.1000 3.46E-{)5 1.07E-{)2 2.45E-{)1 0.2560 Q South Entrance 38 28 56 0.0459 1.41E-{)5 l.25E-{)2 2.50E-{)2 0.0376 S Sinter PlantStoraoe Road 2 10 0.3600 5.80E-{)6 3.50E-{)2 0.0351 Ul South Entrance 5 15 51 0.0500 2.01E-{)6 7.3OE-D3 2.48E-{)2 0.0321 U2 South Entrance 10 12 306 0.0297 2.39E-D6 3.47E-D3 8.85E-{)2 0.0919 P-l Fenced Parkino Across Rte 7 222 0.5000 8.94E-{)4 0.0009 Total 1.0429 1. Vehicletypesand weights areas follows:

Type Weight (tons) A 2 B 15 C 40 

### o 55ernpty 130full E 119empty 154full 2. Emission Factorsfrom Publication EPA-450/3-88-{)08 Control ofOpen Fugitive Dust Sources, Table2-7, Decision Rule for

Paved Road Emission Estimates. ForsL<2 g/rn·2andW<4.4 tons : EF=O.0081 (slJ.7)·.8= WheresL= or ForsL<2 g/rn·2 andW>4.4 tons: EF=O.77(sU.35}·.3= 1.93E-{)4 IbNMT ll.Z2 g/m·2 0.01 ozlydA2 2.34E-{)1 IbNMT


## APPENDIX C, PageC-ll
Wheeling-PittsburghSteelCorponitiOn

## TABLE C-3 WORKSHEET FOR PAVED ROAD SILT LOADING OF 0.95 grams/m2

DallyVehicle Passes I Road Emission Rate 2 Road Description B VehlcleT Length BvVehlcleTvne ,lblhrI Seclfon A B C 0 E lIOn A B C 0 E Total MinoaJunction Facilitv A Entrance Road 313 57 366 0.5114 4.16E-D3 4,40E-lll 2.83E+OO 3.2701 B BOF
- Seraa HandiinaRoad 151 51 254 0.6003 2.35E-ll3 4.62E-lll 2.30E+OO 2.7666 0 SO· HotStria Mill Road 30 14 130 0.3409 2.66E-ll4 7.21E-02 B.69E-lll 0.7414

- E Blast Fumace
- LaborOffIce Road 112 0.2288 6.65E-04 0.0007

F Center Road Section 4 0.3767 3.91E-ll5 0.0000 G Truckscale 229 57 366 0.1100 6.54E-ll4 9.47E-02 6.08E-lll 0.7031 I SIan Haul Road & Berms 48 0.5000 3.62E-ol 0.3623 L BOF Parkinn Lot 10 0.0265 6.89E-ll6 0.0000 U Short Road 5 0.0426 5.53E-ll6 0.0000 BB OffIce Road 85 0.1136 2.51E-ll4 0.0003 HH ForkTruck Road. oavedsection 27 0.1326 9.30E-05 0.0001 KK Strin Mill Parkinn Lot 27 0.0492 3.45E-ll5 0.0000 Total 7.8447 Steubenville Facilitv A Entrance Road 270 86 74 0.5114 3.59E-D3 6.64E-lll 5.71E-lll 1.2389 B ColdSIrio MIll Road 75 14 74 0.2206 4.30E-ll4 4.66E-02 2.46E-ll1 0.2935 C Cold Slrio Mill Entrance Road 18 8 11 0.1136 5.31E-05 1.37E-02 1.89E-ll2 0.0326 01 Plant Center ROAr!. North 1n 64 19 0.0941 4.33E-ll4 9.09E-ll2 2.70E-ll2 0,1183 02 Plant Cenler Road South 1n 21 19 0.2468 1.13E-D3 7.82E-02 7.08E-02 0.1502 H1 PF Environmental Road 2 45 0.0489 2.54E-06 3.32E-02 0.0332 K Parkinn Lot North ofGuard 10 0.0112 2.91E-06 0.0000 L Parkino Lot Soulh ofGuard 4 ·0.0205 1.24E-D3 0.0012 Total 1.8681 Follansbee Facilitv .. A Entrance Road 315 

### 29 15 0.1000 B.18E-ll4 4.38E-ll2 2.26E-ll2 0.0672 B Bvnroduets Plant Road 74 39 0.3200 6.15E-ll4 1.88E-ol 0.1890 C OffIce Road 11 6 0.0800 2.29E-05 7.25E-D3 0.0073 G Plant CenterRoad 72 66 0.0800 1.50E-ll4 7.97E-02 0.0799 H BaliAN8 Road 160 90 0.4198 1.74E-ll3 5.70E-lll 0.5722 I Soulh Entrance 43 11 252 0.1000 1.12E-ll4 1.66E-ll2 3.80E-lll 0.3972 Q South Entrance 38 28 56 0.0459 4.53E-05 1.94E-ll2 3.88E-ll2 0.0583 S SInter PlantStorane

### R~d 2 10 0.3600 1.87E-05 5.44E-ll2 0.0544 Ul Soulh Entrance 5 15 51 0.0500 6.49E-ll6 1.13E-ll2 3.85E-02 0.0498 U2 Soulh Entrance 10 12 306 0.0297 7.71E-ll6 5;38E-D3 1.37E-lll 0.1426 P-l Fenced ParkinaAcross Rte 7 222 0.5000 2.88E-D3 0.0029 Total 1.6207 1. Vehicletypesandweights areasIalows :

Type Weight (tons) A 2 B 15 C 40 

### o 55 empty 130full E 11gempty 154full 2. Emission Factorsfrom Publication EPA-'45013"-8B-oOO Control ofOpen Fugitive DustSources. Table2-7. Decision Rule for

Paved Road Emission Estimates. 

# (

( (

(



### (

(



## <.

(



# <.

ForsL<2 g/m"2 and W<4.4tons: EF=O.0081 (SU.7)A.8 = WheresL= or ForsL<2 g/m"2 and W>4.4tons: EF=O.n(sU.35)A.3= 6.23E-04 IbNMT Jl.ll5. glmA2 0.03 ozIyd"2
3.62E-lll IbNMT


## APPENDIX C, Page'C-12 

# ( l

(

# -( TABLEC-4 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS FOR UNPAVED ROADS, AREAS AND WIDE BERMS

Road Description DailyVehicle Passes 1 Length VMT Speed Avg.No. Avg.Weight A B C D E Total Imn Idav ImDhl Wheels /tons! 

### MingoJunction Facility B Scrao Handlina Road Berms 7 3 12 22 0.19 4.08 5 8 25 0 80" HotStriD Mill Road Wide Berms 2 7 9 0.31 2.81 5 9 32 E BF
- LaborOffice Road Berms 56 56 0.11 6.26 5 4

'" 2 H Main Parkino Lot 213 38 251 0.06 15.29 5 5 8 J ShioMiII Road 93 93 0.10 9.04 5 4 92 K CasterAccess Road 14 127 3 144 0.02 2.17 5 11 38 M ShiD Mill Area 3 13 13 0.03 0.34 15 4 92 0 Slab Lavdown 3 80 80 0.11 8.86 5 4 92 Q LabParkina 2 85 29 114 0.03 3.78 5 5 5 R BOF4 Parkina 2 66 33 99 0.03 3.19 5 5 6 S IMSComer 273 51 254 578 0.03 17.52 15 7 20 T UmeArea 7 86 93 0.04 3.52 15 10 37 W River Road 2 2 0.51 1.02 15 4 2 X Used Machine PartsStoraoeYard 2 10 5 15 0.05 0.74 5 5 6 Y Co06naTowerArea 2 15 8 23 0.07 1.66 5 5 7 Z 44" Bloomina Mill Road 9 9 0.20 1.82 15 4 2 AA Old HeatTreat Road 18 18 0.04 0.68 15 4 2 CC Coil StoraaeYard 2 5 5 0.05 023 5 4 2 DO ,StateStreet Parkina Lot 1 4 20 20 0.04 0.76 5 4 2 EE State Street Parkina Lot2 4 30 30 0.06 1.70 5 4 2 

### GG 44" Bloomina MUIStoraaeYard 2 18 18 0.04 0.63 5 4 2 HH ForkTruckRoad Unoaved Section 27 27 0.05 1.41 15 4 2 JJ V"lSi1ors' ParkinaArea 2 60 13 73 0.06 4.15 5 5 4 

### Steubenville Facllitv 0 PlantCenter Road Wide Berms 35 35 0.30 10.50 5 4 2 E Small Unnaved Roads from Center Road 27 32 59 0.05 322 15 6 9 F West Parkina Lot 100 100 0.04 4.07 5 4 2 

### G East Parkina Lot 120 120 0.06 7.16 5 4 2 H2 Onen Hearth-HotStrin Mill Road 2 5 7 0.95 6.67 15 6 11 J ShiD Mill Road
- Two 15' Lanes 2 5 7 0.20 1.40 15 6 11

1. Vehicletypes and specifications are as follows ; Type Weight Wheels (tons) A 2 4 B 15 7 C 40 11 

## o 55 empty 4 130full E 146 empty 4 200full 2. Parking lottrafficis based on DailyVehicle Passes of nearest road. 3. Type 0 vehicles (slab handlers) travel these areas only. 4. Capacityestimated bysize. 148 Mean Annual DaysWith Rain 347 Working Days perYear Bimonthly means every

### two'months.



## APPENDIX C, Page 

# .C-13

## TABLE C-4 (Continued)

Road Description Dally Vehicle Passes 1 Length VMT Speed Avg. No. Avg.Welght A B C D Total (mn ldav (moh) Wheels (tons) 

### Follansbee Facility D In Front ofCoke Ovens
- North 10 67 77 0.31 23.87 8.3 4 13 E Behind Coke Ovens 1 15 16 0.44 7.09 5.1 4 14 F From North End of Plantto Koooers 23 5 22 50 0.32 16.00 5.4 6 16 I South Entrance 43 11 252 306 0.05 15.30 7.2 7 26 J Boilerhouse Road 70 74 144 0.13 18.72 5.7 4 9 K In Front of Coke Ovens
- South 34 82 116 020 2320 7.4 4 11 L PlantCenter Road Behind Batterv 8 5 21 74 100 0.19 19.00 10.3 7 25 M Maintenance Buildina Road 63 34 97 0.10 9.70 8.9 4 7 N To Gate Storaae Lot
- Met Station 16 13 16 45 0.06 2.70 8.4 5 16 0 AtSouth End olCoal Storaae 4 21 25 0.06 1.50 5.5 4 13 Q South Entrance 38 28 56 122 0.15 18.79 9.8 6 18 R To Sinter PlantAcross OreYard 43 43 0.15 6.45 16.0 8 30 T Bv RR Parallel to IMS Road 32 30 151 213 0.45 95:85 11.4 7 24 V Between Koooors and Coal Storaae 3 5 12 20 0.44 8.73 5.9 6 22 X South Entrance 12 120 132 024 31.68 9.9 4 15 Y South Entrance 205 205 0.17 34.52 7.0 8 30 Z South Entrance 26 20 32 78 0.20 15.60 8.8 6 17 IA&AS OverOld Batteries 38 32 70 0.19 13.30 8.4 4 8 AC Bvoroducts Plant 2 22 24 0.18 4.32 5.1 4 14 P-2 Parklna AreaAcross Rte7 53 I 0.05 2.65 53 5.0 4 2. P-3 Entrance Road Parkina 6 6 0.05. 0.30 5.0 4 2 P-4 Sinter/Convenience Buildina Parkina 16 16 0.05 0.85 5.0 4 2 1 Parkina Section 1 9 9 0.03 023 5.0 4 2 2 Parkina Section 2 5 5 0.04 0.18 5.0

. 4 2 3 Parkina Section 3 17 17 0.02 0.41 5.0 4 2 4 Parkina Section 4 16 16 0.03 0.53 5.0 4 2 5 Parkina Section 5 34 34 0.05 1.53 5.0 4 2

1. Vehicletypes and specifications are as follows: Type Weight Wheels (tons) A 2 4 Autos B 15 4 2 axle Trucks & Plant Equipment C 30 8 3-5 axleTrucks D 40 4 Euclid 2. ·Parking lottraffic is based on DailyVehicle Passes of nearest road. 3. Type Dvehicles (Euclids) travel these areas only. 4 Capacity estimated bysize.



## APPENDIX C, Page C-14 

# (



# ( (

(

(



### (



### l

(



## l

l

# ( TABLE C-5 INITIAL APPLICATION OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT

AT THE WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION MINGO JUNCTION FACILITY Mixture

## =
Application Intensity

## = 1 part Chemical 

### Q partWater 

## 1 gal./yd.**2



# ( Road**Ar~** Chemical Mixture Application Initial Aoolication (aal.) Section (sa.vds.l !(aalJaoDI.) 

### I(aal./aDDI.) Freauencv* Chemical Mixture 

### B 653 109 653 1 109 653 

### 0 1100 183 1 100 1 183 1 100 

## E 798 133 798 1 133 798 

## H 9,285 1,547 9,285 3 4,642 27,855 

### J 2,338 390 2,338 2 779 4,677 K 

### 178 30 178 3 89 533 M 

### 2,760 460 2,760 

### 2 920 5,520 

### 0 3,120 520 3120 1 520 3,120 Q 

### 1,458 243 1,458 1 243 1,458 R 

### 1,133 189 1,133 2 378 2,267 

### S 2,844 474 2,844 2 948 5,689 T 4,444 741 4,444 3 2,222 13,333 

### W 3,600 600 3,600 3 1,800 10,800 

### X 3,322 554 3,322 3 1,661 9,967 

### Y 5,067 844 5,067 1 844 5,067 Z 2,378 396 2,378 1 396 2,378 

### AA 444 74 444 3 222 

### 1,333 CC 

### 1,467 244 1,467 3 733 4,400 

### DO 1 111 185 1,111 1 185 1 111 

## EE 1,333 222 1333 2 444 2,667 

## GG 1,131 188 1,131 2 377 2,261 

## HH 168 28 168 1 28 168 

### JJ 1,000 167 1,000 3 500 3,000 Total galJapplication

## = 8,522 

### 51,134 18,359 110,155

*Application Frequency is the numberoftimes required duringthefirst two month period of control.



## APPENDIX C, Page C-'15 Wheeling-Pittsburgh SteelCorporation C:lc348IreptY2klmjdusLiOO01.wb2. page 1011. 15-Feb-DO

## TABLE C-6 INITIAL APPLICATION OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT AT THE WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION STEUBENVILLE FACILITY ( 

# ( (

Mixture

## = 1 partChemical 

### Q partWater Application Intensity

## = 1 galJyd.**2

Road Area Chemical Mixture Application 

### * Initial Application {aal.} Section 'sq.yds.) {gaIJappl.} 

### I{galJappl.} Frequency. Chemical Mixture D 1408 235 1408 1 235 1408 

### E 512 85 512 3 256 1536 F 3344 557 3344 2 1 115 6688 G 3325 554 3325 2 1 108 6650 H2 16758 2793 16758 2 5586 33,516 

### J 3520 587 3520 2 1173 7040 

### (

Total galJapplication 

### = 4,811 

### 28,867 9,473 56,838

*Application Frequency isthe numberoftimes required duringthefirsttwo month periodofcontrol.



## APPENDIX C, Page C-16 

# ( (

(

(

(

Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation, SteUbenville stdusU.wb2,page1 of 1, 15-Feb-OO

# ( TABLE C-'-7 INITIAL APPLICATION OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT AT THE WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION FOLLANSBEE FACILITY Mixture = 1 part Chemical partWater Application Intensity

## = 1 gal.lyd.**2



# ( Road Area Chemical Mixture Application Initial ADDlicationlaal.) Section I

### (sa.vds.) 

### IlaaIJappl.) !

### (gaI./appl.) Frequencv· Chemical Mixture D 

### 2912 485 2,912 1 485 2912 E 

### 2603 434 2603 1 434 2603 

### F 2254 376 2254 1 376 2254 I 

### 352 59 352 3 176 1,057 J 

### 1221 204 1221 2 407 2,442 K 

### 1409 235 1409 1 235 1409 

### L 1,785 297 1785 1 297 1785 M 

### 704 117 704 2 235 1409 N 

### 880 147 880 2 293 1,760 0 423 70 423 3 211 1,268 Q 

### 1085 181 1085 3 543 3,256 R 

### 1409 235 1,409 3 704 4227 

### T 3,698 616 3,698 1 616 3698 

### V 3077 513 3,077 1 513 3,077 

### X 1,691 282·· 1,691 2 564 3,381 

### Y 1186 198 1186 2 395 2,372 

### Z 1409 235 1409 1 235 1,409 AA&AB 

### 1338 223 1,338 3 669 4,015

AC 

### 1,268 211 1,268 3 

### 634 3804 P-2 4717 786 4717 3 2359 14151 P-3 797 133 797 3 398 2390 P-4 560 93 560 3 280 1679

1 147 24 147 3 73 440 2 205 34 205 3 103 616 3 141 23 141 3 70 422 4 135 22 135 3 67 405 5 264 44 264 3 132 792 5,793 34,758 11,506 66,122**Whe~/ing-Pittsburgh** Stool Corporation * Application Frequency isthe numberoftimes required during the firsttwo month period of control.



## APPENDIXC, Page C-17**C:lc348Ir~ptY2klfbdusU.wb2. Daa~**  1 of1. 15-Feb-J

## TABLE C-8 FOLLOW-UP APPLICATIONS OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT AT THE WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION MINGO JUNCTION FACILITY BASED ON A 52 WEEK/YEAR SEASON DURING INITIAL YEAR ( 

# ( (

Mixture = 

### 1 partChemical 

### Z partWater Application Intensity= 0.5 galJyd.**2

Road Area Chemical Mixture Application YearlvTotals /nal.\ Section !{sa.ydsj '{aalJaool.l I{oalJaool.l Freauencv Chemical Mixture

B 653 41 327 4 !vr.
- QuarterlY aoolication 163 1307 0 1100 69 550 4 Ivr.
-Quarterlvannlication 275 2200 

### E 798 50 399 4 !yr.
- Quarterlvannlication 200 1596 

### H 9.285 580 4642 4 tYr.
-24 dayaoolication 2321 18570 J 2338 146 1169 15 !yr.
- 24dayaoolication 2192 17538 K 178 11 89 15 Ivr. -Quarterlv Roolication 167 1333 M 2760 173 1380 15!vr. -Quarterlv Roolication 2588 20700 0 3120 195 1560 15 !vr.
-24 davaoolication 2925 23400 Q 1458 91 729 4 Ivr.
- 24 dav Rnnlication 365 2917 R 1133 71 567 4 !yr.
- Monthlv

..nnlication 283 2267 S 2844 178 1422 15 Ivr.
- QuarterlYaoolication 2667 21333 T 4444 278 2.222 15 Ivr. -Quarterlyaoolication 4167 33333 W 3,600 225 1800 12 /Vr,
- 24dayaoolication 2700 21600 X 3322 208 1661 4 /vr.
- McmthlYaoolication 831 6644 Y 5067 317 2533 4 !vr.
- QuarterlYaoolication 1.267 10133 Z 2378 149 1189 15 Ivr.
- Quarterlvaonlication 2.229 17833 AA 444 28 222 12 !vr.
- Monthlvaoolication 333 2667 CC 1467 92 733 4 !vr.
- Monthlvannlication 367 2933 DO 1 111 69 556 4 !yr. -Quarterly

..nnlication 278 2??? 

### EE 1333 83 667 12 Ivr.
-24 dayaoolication 1000 8000 

### GG 1131 71 565 12 !yr.
-24 dayaoolication 

### B4a 6783 

### HH 168 11 84 4 !vr.
-24 davRoolication 42 337 JJ 1000 63 500 151vr. - 24 davannlication 938 7500 

### (



# ( (

(



### (
Total galJapplication = 3,196 25,567



## APPENDIX C, Page C-18 29,143 233,147

WheelinrrPitlsburgh SteelCorporation C:1c348IreptY2klmjdust0001.wb2, page 1 ofI, 24-Fe/}{)O

# ( TABLE C-9 FOLLOW-UP APPLICATIONS OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT AT THE WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION STEUBENVILLE FACILITY BASED ON A 52 WEEK/YEAR SEASON
Mixture= 

### 1 partChemical 7 partWater Application Intensity= 

### 0.5 gafJyd.·'2



### Road Area Chemical Mixture Application YearlvTotals (oaf.) Section Ilsa.vds.) I

### laal.laool.l 'loal.laool.l Freauencv Chemical Mixture D 

### 1408 88 704 4 

### /vr.

- Quarterlv aoolication 352 2816 E 

### 512 32 256 17 

### tvr. -Tri-weeklvaoolication 544 4352 F 3344 209 1672 12 

### tvr. - Monthlvaoolication 2508 20064 

### G 3.325 208 1,663 12 

### /vr.

- Monthlvaoolication 2494 19,950 H2 16,758 1047 8379 12 

### tvr. - Monthlvaoolication 12569 100548 

### J 3520 220 1760 12 

### tvr. - Monthlvaoolication 2640 21 120 

# (

( Total gal.lapplication 1,804 14,434 Total gal.tyr. = 

### 21,106 168,850



## APPENDIX C, 

## Page C-19 Wheeling-Pittsburgh SteelCorporation, MingoJunction C:\c348IreptY2klstdust.wb2, page 1 of 1,24-Feb-OO

## TABLE C-10 FOLLOW-UP APPLICATIONS OF CHEMICAL DUST SUPPRESSANT AT

THE WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORPORATION FOLLANSBEE FACILITY BASED ON A 52 WEEK/YEAR SEASON 

# ( (

( Mixture= 1 partChemical 7 partWater Application Intensity

## = .Q,Q gaJ.lyd"*2

Road Area Chemical Mixture Application Initial ApPlication

# (g~ Section
.(sa.yds.)

.(QaIJappl.) (QaIJappl.) Freauency Chemical Mixture D 2912 182 1456 26 

### Ivr.

-2 weekapplication 4732 37853 E 2603 163 1302 26 

### IYr.

-2 weekapplication 4,230 33841 F 2254 141 1127 26 

### Ivr.

-2 weekapplication 3663 29304 I 352 22 176 26 

### Iyr.

-2 weekapplication 572 4579 

### J 1,221 76 611 26 

### Ivr.

-2weekaoolication 1,984 15874 K 1409 88 704 26 

### IYr.

-2 weekaoolication 2,289·. 18314 

### L 1,785 112 892 26 

### Ivr.

-2 weekapplication 2900 23,201 M 704 44 352 26 

### Ivr.

-2 week application 1,145 9,158 

### N 880 55 440 4 

### Iyr.

- Quarterlyapplication 220 1760 

### 0 423 26 211 26 

### Iyr.

-2 weekapplication 687 5,495 Q 1085 68 543 26 

### Ivr.
-2weekaoolication 1,763 14,107 

### R 1,409 88 704 26 Ivr.
- 2 weekapplication 2290 18316 

### T 3698 231 1849 26 

### Ivr.

-2 weekapplication 6010 48,080 

### V 3077 192 1,538 26 

### Ivr.

-2 weekapplication 5,000 39,997 

### X 1,691 106 845 26 

### Ivr.

-2 weekapplication 2,747 21,979 

### Y 1 186 74 593 26 

### Iyr.

-2 weekapplication 1,928 15,421 Z 1409 88 704 26 

### IYr.

-2 weekapplication 2289 18314 

### AA&AB 1,338 

### 84 669 26 

### Iyr
..-2 weekapplication 2175 17400 AC 1268 79 

### 634 26 

### IYr.

-2 week aoolication 2,061 16484 P-2 4717 295 2359 4 Ivr.
- Quarterlyaoolication 1179 9434 P-3 797 50 398 4 

### IYr.

- QuarterlyaDolication 199 1 593 P-4 560 35 280 15 

### Ivr. '-24 dayaoolication 525 4198

1 147 9 73 4 

### IYr.

- Quarterlyaoolication 37 293 2 205 13 103 4 

### Iyr.

- Quarterlyaoolication 51 411 3 141 9 70 4 

### Iyr.

- Quarterlyapplication 35 282 4 135 8 67 4 

### Iyr.

- Quarterlyapplication 34 270 5 '264 17 132 4 

### Ivr.

- Quarterly application 66 528 

# ( (



### (



### (

eeling,PiltsbUfah SteelCorporation 2,172 17,379



## APPENDIX C, Page C-20 50,811 368,635

C:\c348lreptY2klfbdust99.wb2, page 1 of1, 15-Feb-OC (r"

..



# TABLE C-ll SUMMARY LISTING FROM MECH@X@Y FOR UNPAVED ROADS FOR MINGO JUNCTION, STEUBENVILLE AND FOLLANSBEE**-~---Unpaved-Contro1** using Chemical**Suppressants~---- -~-----~--~Unpaved-------~---**  Length Speed Weight Silt

---- Emission Rate (g/s)

--- Weeks/ Efficiency

---- Emission Rate (g/s)

---- Road Segment ID Daily VP (mile) (mph) Wheels (ton) (%) Worst Case Annual Applic. (percent) Worst Case Annual


### --------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- 

## -------- -------- 

### -------------- -------------- ----------- ----------- -------------- -------------- Mingo Jct B 22 .1856 5 8 25 6 1.355426E-02 7.660892E-03 .13 43 2.367243E-02 .0133797 D 9 .3125 5 9 32 6 1. 177039E-02 6.652647E-03 13 43 2.055692E-02 1. 161881E-02 E 56 .1117 5 4 2 6 2.505904E-03 1.416341E"'03 13 43 4.376546E-03 2.473631E-03 H 251 .0609 5 5 8 6 1.636991E-02 9.252301E-03 13 48 3.155573E-02 1.783535E-02 J 93 ;1 5 4 92 6 1.294312E-02 7.315471E-03 3.5 86 9.490819E-02 5.364227E-02 t-t1 K 144 .0151 5 11 38 6 2**.772441E~03** 1.566988E"'03 3.5 86 1.981634E-02 1.120023E-02 t-t1 M 13 .0261 15 4 92 6 1.490127E-03 8.422227E-04 3.5 86 3.462618E-03 1.957078E-03
. 

### l:':l 0 80 .1108 5 4 92 6 1.297622E-02 7.**334179E~03** 3.5 86 9.045872E-02 5.112743E-02 

### Z Q 114 .0331 5 5 5 6**3.039376E~03** 1.717861E-03 13 46 5.605781E-03 3.168397£-03 t:l H R 99 .0322 5 5 6 6 2.917222E-03 1.648819E-03 13 46 5.380482E-03 3.041058E-03 

### :><: S 578 .0303 15 7 20 6 3.323809E-02 1. 878623E-02 3.5 86 .2437255 .1377541 T 93 .0378 15 10 37 6 1.229869E-02 6.951244E-03 3.5 86 9.018283E-02 5.097149E-02 

### 0 W 2 .5114 15 4 2 6 3.64525E-04 2.060302E-04 4.3 83 2.146853E-03 1.213405E-03 

## ... X 15 .0492 5 5 6 6 7.132133E-04 4.031094E-04 13 43 1.245623E-03**7.040281E~04** t-t1 y 23 .0719 5 5 7 6 1.780256E-03 1.006204E-03 13 43**3.109207E~03** 1.757329E-03 

### OJ Z 9 .2027 15 4 2 6 5.222073E-04**~.951525E-04** 3.5 86 3.829197E-03 2.164269E-03 lQ AA 18 .0379 15 4 2 6 2.431355E-04 1.374206E-04 4.3 83 1.431935E-03**8.09332E~04** CD CC 5 .0455 5 4 2 6 9. 113907E:-05 5.151196E-05 13 43 1.591738E-04 8.996532E-05 DD 20 .0378 5 4 2 6 2.875463E-04 1.625217E-04 13 46 5.303462E-04 2.997526E-04 

### 0 EE 30 .0568 5 4 2 6 2.092822E-04 1.182866E-04 4.3 82 1.192229E-03 6.738501E-04 I GG· 18 .035 5 4 2 6 7. 990707E-05 4.516362E-05 4.3 82 4.40789E-04 2.491347E-04 N f-1 HH 27 .0521 15 4 2 6 1.531726E-03**8.65734E~04** 13 48 2.952657E-03 1. 668847E-03 JJ 73 .0588 5 5 4 6 7.631416E-04 4.31329E-04 3.5 86 5.454644E-03 3.082974E:-03 

### -----.------- ------------ ------------ ------------ .13246182934 .07486765928 .656194741 .37088243082 Steubenville D 35 .3 5 4 2 6 4.206419E-03 2.377475E-03 13 43 7.346484E-03**4.152246E~03** E 59 .0545 15 6 9 6 2.647528E-03 1.496388E-03 3 89 2.368942E-02 .0133893 F 100 .0407 5 4 2 6**4.596901E~04** 2.5·98177E-04 4 ·84 2.847637E-03 1. 60949E-03 G 120 .0597 5 4 2 6 8.09145E-04 4.573301E-04 4 84 5.012401E-03 2.833018E-03 H2 7 .95 15 6 11 6 9.101504E-03 5.144185E-03 4 84 5.638098E-02 3.186663E-02

J 7 .2 15 6 11 6 1. 916106E-03 1.082986E-03 4 84 1.186968E-02 6.708764E-03



### ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

.0191403921 .0108181818 .107146602 .060559448

## TABLE C-ll 

## (Continued)

93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 43 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 50 50 88 85 85 85 85 85 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 13 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 13 13 3 4 4 4 4 4 4.301327E-03 8.210017E-04 2.656776E-03 5.129399E-03 1.790862E-03 3.315937E-03 8.883405E-03 1.215184E-03 4.922863E-03 1.791125E-04 5.988598E-03 5.689724E-03 4.8:20316E-02 1.995206E-03 7.526549E-03 1.344969E-02 4.404319E-03**1.726655E~03** 5.037965E-04 5.239738E-04 5.931779E-05**3.822749E~05** 1.654525E-05 1.225574E-05 2.083476E-05 2. 941378E-05

9.37564E-05 7.610251E-03 1.45258:2E-03 4.700581E-03 9.075341E-03 3.168535E-03 5.86682E-03 1.57;L723E-02 .00215 8.709922E-03 3.169001E-04 1.059551E-02 1.006671E-02 8.528487E-02 3.530078E-03 1.331657E-02 2.379627E-02 7.792472E"'03 3.054935E-03

8.91357E-04 9.270564E-04 1. 049498E-04 6.763513E-05 2.927317E-05 2.168383E-05 3.686252E-05 5.20412E-05 1. 658813E-04 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 -----Unpaved-Control using Chemical Suppressants-----**---~-------Unpaved--~---~----** Silt**--~-** Emission Rate (g/s)**-~-** Weeks/ Efficiency ----Emission Rate (g/s)

_ (%) Worst Case Annual Applic. (percent) Worst Case Annual 13 14 16 26

9 11 25 7 16 13 18 30 24 22 15 30 17

8 14 2' 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 6 7 4 4 7 4 5 4 6 8 7 6 4 8 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Weight Wheels '(ton) 8.3 5.1 5.4 7.2 5.7 7.4 10.3 8.9 8.4 5.5 9.8

16 11.4 5.9 9.9

7 8.8 8.4 5.1

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 .31 .44 .32 .0499

.13

.2 .19

.1 .06 .06 .15 .15 .45 .44 .24 .17

.2 .19 .18 .0499

.05 .0499

.03

.04 .02 .03 .045 -77

16 50 306 144 116 100 97 45 25 122 43 213

20 132 205 78 70 24 53

6 16 9 5 17 16 34 

# --------------- _w______ ---------------- - w -------- w_ww --------______ 

### w_ww_______ -- w__

_ _ FollaMbee 0 E F I J K L M N 

### o Q R T V X Y Z AA&AB AC P-2 P-3 P-4

1 2 3 4 5 Length Speed Road Segment 10 Daily VP (mile) (mph)



### ;t:l ttJ ttJ 

### Z tJ H 

### :><: \) ttJ 

### PJ to (I) \) I N N .21850231745 .12349788971**~, .~** **~'. ,~**  

## ""' r-- 

### r> 

### ,-**l~** ,-\, ."", 

# '" -""

# (



# ( TABLE C-12 CONTROL EFFICIENCIES FOR ON-GOING CONTROL PROGRAMS

Control Efficienciesfor MonthlyApplications Ground Inventory 1- Month Average Running Average Averaging Application (gallyd 2 

### chemical Control Efficiency Control Efficiency

Period Concentration atstart of period from EPA-450/3-88-008 (%) 

### Figure 3-4 l%l Jan 1 - Feb 1 1.00 gaVyd of 1: 6 solution 0.143 78 78 Feb 1 - Mar 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.181 84 81 Mar 1 -Apr 1 0.50 gallyd of 1: 12 solution 0.220 89 84 Apr1-May1 0.50 gallyd of 1: 12 solution 0.258 90 85 May 1 -Jun 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.297 90 86 Jun 1 - Jul1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.335 90 87 Jul1 -Aug 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.374 90 87 Aug 1 - Sep 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.412 90 88 Sep1-0ct1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.451 90 88 Oct 1 -Nov 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.489 90 88 Nov 1 - bec 1 0.50 gaVyd .of 1: 12 solution 0.527 90 88 Dec 1-Jan 1 0.50 aaVvd of 1: 12 solution 0.566 90 89

Control Efficienciesfor BimonthlyApplications Ground Inventory 2- Month Average Running Average Averaging Application (gal/yd 2 

### chemical Control Efficiency Control Efficiency

Period Concentration atstart of period from EPA-45013-88-00B (%) & 

### MECH@X@Y (%) 

### Jan 1 - Mar 1 1.00 gaVyd of 1: 6 solution 0.143 58 58 Mar 1·-May 1 0.50 gallyd of 1: 12 solution 0.181 62 60 May 1 - Jul1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.220 67 \

### , 62 Jul1-Sep 1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.258 67 

### 64 Sep1-Nov1 0.50 gaVyd of 1: 12 solution 0.297 67 

### 64 Nov1 -Jan 1 0.50 oavVd of 1: 12 solution 0.335 67 65



## APPENDIX C, Page C-23t"iJ t"iJ 

### t:r:I 

### Z tJ H 

# :x: o t"iJ III I.Q CD 

## o I N 

## TABLE C-13 CHEMICAL APPLICATIONS FOR ON-GOING PROGRAMS BASED ON "CONTROL OF OPEN FUGITIVE DUST SOURCES"

• WorstCase Control Controlled PM10 Road DescrlpUoll DallyVehicle Pa8Ses 1 Length VMT speed Avg. No. Avg.Welght AppllcaUon Uncontrolled Efficiency (g/s) A B C D E Total Imll /dav ImDhl Wheels ltonsl Frsouencv PM10/n/sl 10/01 WorstCe88 Annual MlnnoJunction Facllltv B Ser·n Handllno Road Benns 7 3 12 22 0.19 4.08 5 8 25 Bimonthlv 0.0247 65 0.0087 0.0049 0 80" Hot Strln Mill Road Wide Benns 2 7 9 0.31 2.81 5 9 32 Blmonthlv 0.0188 65 0.0066 0.0038 E BF
- LaborOffice Road Banns 56 56 0.11 6.26 5 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0139 65 0.0049 0.0028 H Main Parklnn Lot 213 38 251 0.06 15.29 5 5 8 Blmonthlv 0.0584 65 0.0206 0.0116 J Strlo Mill Road 93 93 0.10 c9.04 5 4 92 Monthlv 0.0929 89 0.0107 0.0060 K CasterAccess Road 14 127 3 144 0.02 2.17 5 11 38 Monthlv 0.0156 89 0.0018 0.0010 M Strlo Mill Area 

# • 13 13 0.03 0.34 15 4 92 Monthlv 0.0105 89 0.0012 0.0007 

## a Slab L,vdown 

# • 80 80 0.11 6.86 5 4 92 MOnthlv 0.0911 89 0.D105 0.0059 Q Lab Parkino 

# • 65 29 114 0.03 3.78 5 5 5**Bimonthi~** 0.0124 65 0.0044 0.0025 R BOF4 Parklnn 

# • 66 33 99 0.03 3.19 5 5 6 Blmonthlv 0.0112 65 0.0040 0.0022 S IMSComer 273 51 254 578 0.03 17.52 15 7 20 Monthlv 0.2924 89 0.0336 0.0190 T UmeArea 7 86 93 0.04 3.52 15 10 37 Monthlv 0.0756 89 0.0087 0.0049 W River Road 2 2 0.51 1.02 15 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0068 65 0.0024 0.0014 X Used Machine Parts Storaoe Yard 

## , 10 5 c 15 0.05 0.74 5 5 6 Blmonthlv 0.0026 65 0.0009 0.0005 Y Coolin" TowerArea 

## , 15 8 23 0.07 1.66 5 5 7 Monthlv 0.0059 89 0.0007 0.0004 Z 44" Bloomln':' Mill Road 9 9 0.20 1.82 15 4 2 Monthlv 0.0122 89 0.0014 0.0008 AA Old HeatTreat Road 18 18 0.04 0.68 15 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0045 65 0.0016c 0.0009 CC Coli Storaoe Yard 

# , 5 5 0.05 0.23 5 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0005 65 0.0002 0.0001 DO State Street Parkin" Lot 1 

## • 20 20 0.04 0.76 5 4 2 Monthlv
. 0.0017 89 0.0002 0.0001 EE State Slreet Parklno Lot2 

# • 30 30 0.06 1.70 5 4 2 Monthlv 0.0038 89 0.0004 0.0002 GG 44" Bloomlnn Mill StoraoeVard 

# , 18 18 0.04 0.63 5 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0014 65 0.0005 0.0003 HH ForkTruck Road Unnaved Section 27 27 0.05 1.41 15 4 2 Monthlv 0.0094 89 0.0011 0.0006 JJ Visitors' Parklon Area 

# • 60 13 73 0.06 4.15 5 5 4 Monthlv 0.0125 89 0.0014 0.0008 0.7788 0.1264 0.0714 SteUbenville Facllltv 0 Plant CenterRoad Wide Benns 35 35 0.30 10.50 5 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0233 65 0.0082 0.0046 E Small Unoaved Roads from Center Road 27 32 59 0.05 3.22 15 6 9 Monthlv 0.0392 89 0.0045 0.0025 F West Parkin" Lot 100 100 0.04 4.07 5 4 2 Monthlv

. 0.0090 89 0.0010 0.0006 G East Parkinn Lot 120 120 0.06 7.16 5 4 2 Monlhlv 0.0159 89 0.0018 0.0010 H2 Onen Hearth-Hot Strln Mill Road 2 5 7 0.95 6.67 15 6 11 Monthlv 0.0888 89 0.0102 0.0058 J Slrln Mill Road
-Two 15' Lanes 2 5 7 0.20 1.40 15 6 11 Monthlv 0.Q186 89 0.0021 0.0012 0.1949 0.0279 0.0158 1. Vehicletypes and specifications are asfollows: Type Weight Wheels 148 Mean Annual DaysWith Rain (tons) 347 Working Days perYear A 2 4 Bimonthlymeans**~ery** two months. B 15 7 6 % Typical Slitcontent C 40 11 0.2 % Surface matenal moisture content o 55 empty 4 130 full E 146empty 4 200 full rParklng lottraffic Is based on DallyVehicle Passes ofnearest road. c 'rype 0 vehicles (slab handlers) travel these areas only. Capacity eslimaied by size. 

### r Enetm'&'Enwronmsfl'-"'\fansaBmenf. Inc. 

### o (\ 

### . '- 

### r . ,"-""**~.** C.1c34B1r8PjX?,k'lJelrlnOOO2.wb2._. 1 of1.**~.IHJO.** 

## r-,

## TABLEC-13 (Continued) 

# ---.

:J::l ''Ll 'Ll 

### t:'1 

### Z 

## o H 

## :>< () 'Ll 

### l1J to CD () I N (Jl : 5 WorstC8se Control Controlled PM10 Road Description DallyVehIcle Passes 1 Length VMT Speed Avg.No. Avg.Welght ApplicatIon Uncontrolled Efficiency (g/s) A B C DTotill 1mII Idav (mphl Wheels (tonsl Freauencv PM101a/s\ 1%\ WorstCase Annual 

### FoIlansbee Facility D In FrontofCoke Ovens
- North 10 67 

## n 0.31 23.67 8.3 4 13 Monthlv 0.1870 89 0.0215 0.0121 E Behind CokeOvens 1 15 16 0.44 7.09 5.1 4 14 Monthlv 0.0349 89 0.0040 0.0023 F From North End of Plantto Koppers 23 5 22 50 0.32 16.00 5.4 6 16 Monthlv 0.0877 89 0.0101 0.0057 I South Entrance 43 11 252 306 0.05 15.30 7.2 7 26 Monthlv 0.1356 95 0.0068 0.0038 J aciilerhouse Road 70 74 144 0.13 18.72 5.7 4 9 Monthlv 0.0857 89 0.0098 0.0056 K In FrontofCokeOvens
-South· 34 82 116 0.20 23.20 7.4 4 11 Monthlv 0.1513 89 0.0.174 0.0098 L PlantCenterRoad Behind Battery8 5 21 74 100 0.19 19.00 10.3 7 25 Monthlv 0.2410 89 0.0277 0.0156 M Maintenance Bulldlno Road 63 34 97 0.10 9.70 8.9 4 7 Monthlv 0.0620 89 0.0071 0.0040 N To Gate Storaoe Lot
- MetStation 16 13 16 45 0.06 2.70 8.4 5 16 Blmonthlv 0.0230 65 0.0081 0.0046 0 AtSouth End ofCoal Storaae 4 21 25 0.06 1.50 5.5 4 13 Monthlv 0.0078 89 0.0009 0.0005 Q South Entrance 38 28 56 122 0.15 18.79 9.8 6 18 Monthlv 0.1959 69 0.0225 0.0127 R ToSinterPlantAcrossOreYard 43 43 0.15 6.45 16.0 8 30 Monthlv 0.1355 89 0.0156 0.0088 T avRR Parallelto IMS Road 32 30 151 213 0.45 95.85 11.4 7 24 Monthlv 1.3009 89 0.1494 0.0844 V Between Koooersand Coal Stora!:le 3 5 12 20 0.44 8.73 5.9 6 22 Monthlv 0.0598 89 0.0069 0.0039 X South Entrance 12 120 132 0.24 31.68 9.9 4 15 Monthlv 0.3123 89 0.0359 0.0203 Y South Entrance 205 205 0.17 34.52 7.0 8 30 Monthlv 0.3172 89 0.0364 0.0206 Z South Entrance 26 20 32 78 0.20 15.60 8.8 6 17 Monthlv 0.1433 89 0.0165 0.0093 AA&AB OverOld Batteries 38 32 70 0.19 13.30 8.4 4 8 Monthlv 0.0862 89 0.0099 0.0056

AC Bvoroducts Plant 2 22 24 0.18 4.32 5.1 4 14 Monthlv 0.0212 89 0.0024 0.0014 P-2 ParkinoAreaAcross Rte7 53 53 0.05 2.65 5.0 4 2 Blmonthlv 0.0059 65 0.0021 0.0012 P-3 Entrance Road Parkino 6 6 0.05 0.30 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0007 89 0.0001 0.0000 P-4 SinterIConvenlence Bulldino Parklno 16 16 0.05 0.85 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0019 89 0.0002 0.0001 1 Parkina Section 1 9 9 0.03 0.23 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0005 89 0.0001 0.0000 2 Park/no Section 2 5 5 0.04 0.18 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0004 89 0.0000 0.0000 3 Parkino Section 3 17 17 0.02 0.41 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0009 89 0.0001 0.0001 4 ParkinoSection 4 16 16 0.03 0.53 5.0 4 2 Monthlv 0.0012 89 0.0001 0.0001 5 Parklno Section 5 34 34 0.05 1.53 5.0 4 

### 2 Monthlv 0.0034 89 0.0004 0.0002 3.6032 0.4119 0.2328 1. Vehicletypesand speclficatlonsareasfollows: Type Weight Wheels (tons) A 2 4 Autos B 154 2axleTrucks &Plant Equipment C 30 8 3-5 axleTrucks D 40 4 Euclid 2. Parking lottraffic Isbased on DailyVehicle Passes ofnearestroad. 3. Type Dvehicles (Eucllds)traveltheseareasonly. 4 Capacityestimatedbysize. 5. Bimonthlyis everytwa months.