alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-11-00023-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

AIDE CARRILLO MARTINEZ, Appellant,

v.

SONIA PENA, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 

1 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-08-3386-A. Appellant has filed an 

unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an 

agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellant requests that this Court 

dismiss the appeal.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s unopposed 

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is 

hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed 

against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the 

parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at 

appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will 

issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

24th day of March, 2011.
#### § 105-68.815 How may I contest a proposed debarment?

If you as a respondent wish to contest a proposed debarment, you or your representative must provide the debarring official with information in opposition to the proposed debarment. You may do this orally or in writing, but any information provided orally that you consider important must also be submitted in writing for the official record.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4452

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 115 North Chester in Ruleville, Mississippi, as the

‘‘Fannie Lou Hamer Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Post Office building located at 115

5 North Chester in Ruleville, Mississippi, shall be known

6 and designated as the ‘‘Fannie Lou Hamer Post Office’’.
2

•HR 4452 EH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

5 to the Fannie Lou Hamer Post Office.

Passed the House of Representatives September 19,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4452

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building

fice’’.sissippi, as the ‘‘Fannie Lou Hamer Post Oflocated at 115 North Chester in Ruleville, Mis-
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-415 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

Control Measures on Salmonella 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and COLOMBIA 

Effected by Exchange of Letters 

April 15, 2012 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
COLOMBIA 

Trade: Control Measures on 

Salmonella 

Agreement effected by exchange of letters 

 April 15, 2012; 

 Entered into force April 15, 2012.
No. 11-9274.

#### Byrd *v.*Florida Department of Corrections et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-7975.

#### Savarirayan *v.*White County Community Hospital et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"18-2271: SANDERS v. IANCU [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SVttGvCi1x\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-01-2019-18-2271-sanders-v-iancu-rule-36-judgment-18-2271-rule_36_judgment-10-1-2019-1\/\">18-2271: SANDERS v. IANCU [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-01-2019-18-2271-sanders-v-iancu-rule-36-judgment-18-2271-rule_36_judgment-10-1-2019-1\/embed\/#?secret=SVttGvCi1x\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“18-2271: SANDERS v. IANCU [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"SVttGvCi1x\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: SANDERS v. IANCU [RULE 36 JUDGMENT](pdf) Appeal Number: 18-2271 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
The Skyhunter UAS manual is too large for upload to regulations.gov. Therefore, if interested, 

please follow the link below to the assembly and operating manual for the sUAS.

http://www.fpvmodel.com/u/goods_data/2015-07/20150708100853-1038.pdf
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. TA-201-71]


Crabmeat From Swimming Crabs

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Amendment of scope of the investigation to exclude shelf-stable 
crabmeat.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: At the request of petitioners in the investigation, the 
Commission amended the scope of investigation No. TA-201-71, Crabmeat 
from Swimming Crabs, to exclude shelf-stable crabmeat. Shelf-stable 
crabmeat is defined as crabmeat that is packed in airtight containers 
and is produced using additives and a thermal manufacturing process so 
that it requires no refrigeration. The Commission's notice of 
institution of the investigation was published in the Federal Register 
of March 20, 2000 (65 FR 15008).

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 23, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436.

    Issued: June 26, 2000.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16592 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### § 302-7.201 Is temporary storage in excess of authorized limits and excess valuation of goods and services payable at Government expense?

No, charges for excess weight, valuation above the minimum amount, and services obtained at higher costs must be borne by the employee in the same manner as the employee is responsible for excess transportation costs.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12255, Feb. 16, 2024]
§ 15.223 Operation in the band 1.705-10 MHz. ( a ) The field strength of any emission within the band 1.705-10.0 MHz shall not exceed 100 microvolts/meter at a distance of 30 meters. However, if the bandwidth of the emission is less than 10% of the center frequency, the field strength shall not exceed 15 microvolts/meter or (the bandwidth of the device in kHz) divided by (the center frequency of the device in MHz) microvolts/meter at a distance of 30 meters, whichever is the higher level. For the purposes of this section, bandwidth is determined at the points 6 dB down from the modulated carrier. The emission limits in this paragraph are based on measurement instrumentation employing an average detector. The provisions in § 15.35(b) for limiting peak emissions apply.
( b ) The field strength of emissions outside of the band 1.705-10.0 MHz shall not exceed the general radiated emission limits in § 15.209.
Exhibit
13.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. § 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the annual report of Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
Evans, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:






1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.












Date:
June 30, 2008




/s/       Patrick
      EvansPatrick
      Evans Title: President and Chief Executive
  Officer
#### § 302-7.300 When may I be authorized an unaccompanied air baggage (UAB) shipment?

UAB is used in connection with permanent change of station OCONUS, renewal agreement travel, and temporary change of station. You may be authorized a UAB shipment prior to transferring from a CONUS location to an OCONUS location, between OCONUS locations, or from an OCONUS location to a CONUS location. UAB for CONUS to CONUS shipments is not allowed under the FTR.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Openwave Systems Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), David C. Peterschmidt, as Chief Executive Officer of Openwave Systems Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of his
knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Openwave Systems Inc.



| |  |     |  |                          
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ David C. Peterschmidt
| |  |     |  | David C. Peterschmidt    
| |  |     |  | President and            
| |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer  

February 9, 2007

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Openwave Systems Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Harold L. Covert, as Chief Financial Officer of Openwave Systems Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, to the best of his knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Openwave Systems Inc.



| |  |     |  |                             
| |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ Harold L. Covert        
| |  |     |  | Harold L. Covert            
| |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and
| |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer     

February 9, 2007
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Section
      1350**


**CERTIFICATION**








The
      undersigned officer hereby certifies
      that, to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of COMFORCE
      Corporation for the quarter endedSeptember 30,
      2007 as to which this Certification is
      an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the
      information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE
      Corporation.








SignedNovember
      7,2007.








/s/
              Harry V. MaccarroneHarry
                V. MaccarroneExecutive
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
795 A.2d 848

#### IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY C. NWAKA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 031921991).

April 29, 2002.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-366, concluding that ANTHONY C. NWAKA of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating *RPC*1.1(a)(gross neglect), *RPC*1.4(a)(failure to communicate with client) and *RPC*8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities) and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTHONY C. NWAKA is suspended fi’om the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective May 28, 2002; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

*469ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
No. 11-5222.

#### Pitchon *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Civ. No. 2421.

Second Appellate District.

February 4, 1918.]

#### FRED N. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. THE RECORDER'S COURT, etc., et al., Respondents.

Appeal—Record—Affirmance of Judgment.—An appeal from a judgment rendered on writ of *certiorari*must be affirmed where the only record on appeal is in the form of a typewritten transcript and no part of it is printed in the brief.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County. Franklin J. Cole, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

William Sea, Jr., for Appellant. .

D. L. Ault, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment ren-

dered on writ of *certiorari.*The only record on file is in the form of a typewritten transcript. Appellant has not complied with section 953e of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that upon such a record the parties must “print in their briefs, or in a supplement appended thereto, such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court.” The brief for appellant is absolutely deficient, in that no part of the record has been printed therein.

On the authority of *Stewart*v. *Andrews,*35 Cal. App. 230, [169 Pac. 397]*; Jones*v. *American Potash Co.,*35 Cal. App. 128, [169 Pac. 397]; *Hepler*v. *Wright,*35 Cal. App. 567, [170 Pac. 667], and other cases cited in those decisions, the judgment is affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on April 4, 1918.
No. 11-9639.

#### Melancon *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the TACDPCP of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, of the Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period extending through June 15, 2002. 

For further information, contact Frank Vinicor, M.D., M.P.H., Executive Secretary, TACDPCP, 4770 Buford Highway, N.E., m/s K-10, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724. Telephone 770/488-5000, or fax 770/488-5966. 

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                 

Dated: June 23, 2000. 

Carolyn J. Russell, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 00-16847 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1802

EARL L. RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE GREAT STATE OF MARYLAND; CECIL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICE; NICHOLAS RICCIUTI, Director of Cecil County Department of Social Services; WILLIAMS JONES, Employee of Department of Social Services; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; MRS. GULOTTI, Elkton Maryland Branch; MRS. DAVIDS, Elkton Maryland Branch; THE GREAT STATE OF WASHINGTON; CLALLAM COUNTY WASHINGTON; JIM JONES, Administrator; LINDA CLEVENGER, Administrator; DEPARTMENT OF PAROLE AND PROBATION,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01087-CCB)

Submitted: October 27, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl L. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Julia Doyle Bernhardt, Assistant Attorney General, William Ferris Brockman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark C. Jobson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON, Olympia,Washington; Kelly Hughes Iverson, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM:

Earl L. Richardson appeals the district court’s order

dismissing this action complaining about the termination of

social security benefits. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Richardson v. The Great State of

Maryland , No. 1:08-cv-01087-CCB (D. Md. July 2, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 303-70.401 Are there any limitations on the baggage we must transport from an official TDY location?

Yes. You must only transport Government property and the employee's personal property, including professional books, papers, and equipment (PBP&E).
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4417

To authorize appropriations for a retirement incentive for certain employees

of National Laboratories.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1994

Mr. RICHARDSON (for himself and Mr. BAKER of California) introduced the

following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Armed

Services and Science, Space, and Technology

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for a retirement incentive for

certain employees of National Laboratories.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That there is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec4 retary of Energy for the California Public Employees Re5 tirement System such sums as may be necessary for an

6 early retirement incentive established by the University of

7 California that is—

8 (1) commensurate with the program known as

9 Voluntary Early Retirement Incentive III provided
2

•HR 4417 IH

1 to members of the University of California Retire2 ment Program; and

3 (2) offered during the 90-day period beginning

4 on January 1, 1995, to individuals who are enrolled

5 in the California Public Employees Retirement Sys6 tem and who are employed by the University of Cali7 fornia in positions at the Los Alamos National Lab8 oratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,

9 or Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory that are paid for

10 with Federal funds.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT 

Bank ofFlorida N.A. f/k/a Citizens National Bank of Southwest Florida, Naples, Collier County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida.

Bank of Florida Trust Company f/k/a Citizens Capital Management, Inc., Naples, Collier County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida. 

Bank of Florida, Ft.Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida. 

Organized under the laws of the State of Florida. 

Bank of Florida, Tampa Bay, Hillsborough County, Florida. 

Organized underthe laws of the State of Florida
No. 11-9139.

#### Everett *v.*Scribner, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.