alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 25.138 Earth Stations in the 3.7-4.2 GHz band. ( a ) Applications for new, modified, or renewed earth station licenses and registrations in the 3.7-4.0 GHz portion of the band in CONUS are no longer accepted.
( b ) Applications for new earth station licenses or registrations within CONUS in the 4.0-4.2 GHz portion of the band will not be accepted until the transition is completed and upon announcement by the Space Bureau via Public Notice that applications may be filed.
( c ) Fixed and temporary fixed earth stations operating in the 3.7-4.0 GHz portion of the band within CONUS will be protected from interference by licensees in the 3.7 GHz Service subject to the deadlines set forth in § 27.1412 of this chapter and are eligible for transition into the 4.0-4.2 GHz band so long as they: ( 1 ) Were operational as of April 19, 2018 and continue to be operational;
( 2 ) Were licensed or registered (or had a pending application for license or registration) in the ICFS database on November 7, 2018; and
( 3 ) Timely certified the accuracy of the information on file with the Commission by May 28, 2019.
( d ) Fixed and temporary earth station licenses and registrations that meet the criteria in paragraph (c) of this section may be renewed or modified to maintain operations in the 4.0-4.2 GHz band.
( e ) Applications for new, modified, or renewed licenses and registrations for earth stations outside CONUS operating in the 3.7-4.2 GHz band will continue to be accepted.
[85 FR 22864, Apr. 23, 2020, as amended at 88 FR 21440, Apr. 10, 2023]
2098_Lake Road_6_OETM Part III notes.txt

This file contains additional information for the 2098_Lake Road_6_Other_Emission_Test_Methods_Part_III.xls CO Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. Formaldehyde Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. CH4 Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. SO2 Emission Data: Method 6C entered in ERT. Worksheet deleted. Hg Emission Data 30B: The measured value and the emission rate value in lb/mmBtu are an average of both tubes (A&B). The unit 6 boiler is fueled by a blend of 80% subbituminous coal fuel #1 & 20% bituminous coal fuel #2 and natural gas fuel #3. The (80%) fuel #1 & (20%) fuel #2 coal feed rates were converted to pounds per hour and the value listed is for the start of the run. Since the fuel #3 natural gas feed rate units (MCF) are not listed, these values were entered into the 'Other Supporting Information' column. Speciated Volatile Organic HAP: Worksheet deleted. Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP: Worksheet deleted. HCN Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. HCl Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. HF Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. NOx Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

Page 1
#### John T. JOSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BELL COUNTY TEXAS, Rick Miller, County Attorney; Dan Smith, Sheriff, Jane Doe, Secretary; R.W. Patterson, Jail Administrator; Bell County Law Enforcement Center; Pennybaker, Corporal; FNU Andrews, Officer; FNU Minter, Officer; Planas, Officer; Fischbach; Fnu Martinez, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-50773.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 22, 2004.

John T. Josey, Rogers, TX, pro se.

Enid Allyn Wade, Ñaman, Howell, Smith & Lee, Waco, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

John T. Josey filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that, while he was being housed at the Bell County Law Enforcement Center as a pre-trial detainee, various prison officials and governmental entities violated his civil rights. Jo-sey’s complaint also contained several state law claims. The district court dismissed Josey’s complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and Josey timely appealed.

Josey has filed a motion to compel this court to acknowledge that his handwritten appellate brief was compliant with the rules of this court. That motion is GRANTED. All of Josey’s other outstanding motions before this court are DENIED.

Liberally construed, Josey has presented an argument that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. After a *de novo*review of the record and the briefs before us, we conclude that the district court correctly dismissed Josey’s complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). *See Lowrey v. Texas A & M Univ. Sys.,*117 F.3d 242, 246 (5th Cir.1997); *Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Ass’n,*987 F.2d 278, 284 (5th Cir.1993); *Manax v. McNamara,*842 F.2d 808, 812 (5th Cir.1988).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 14302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05513]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts

Proposed Collection: Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a 
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and 
Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(A)]. This program 
helps ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, 
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, 
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of 
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. 
Currently, the National Endowment for the Arts, on behalf of the 
Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities, is soliciting comments 
concerning renewal of the Application for Domestic Indemnification. A 
copy of this collection request can be obtained by contacting the 
office listed below in the address section of this notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the 
address section below on or before May 5, 2014. The National Endowment 
for the Arts is particularly interested in comments which:

--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, 
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms 
of information technology, e.g., permitting the electronic submissions 
of responses.

ADDRESSES: Patricia Loiko, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room 729, Washington, DC 20506-0001, telephone 
(202) 682-5541 (this is not a toll-free number), fax (202) 682-5721.

    Dated: March 10, 2014.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-05513 Filed 3-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
No. 11-9240.

#### Cage *v.*Smith, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-84,182-01

EX P ARTE F IDEL RAMIREZ, A ppl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2014-DCR- 00042-D IN THE 103rd DISTRICT COURT

F ROM CAM ERON COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 4 1 8 S

. W

. 2 d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of assault on a family member a

nd sentenc ed to ten y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends, inter alia , that his trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use he err oneously advised Applicant that he was pleading guilty in exchang e for a probate d sentenc e. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 2942

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’ s cl ai m of i neff ective assistance of counsel. The trial court may

use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f t he trial court elects t o hold a h ea ring , it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Appl i ca n t is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to wh et h er the perf ormanc e of Applicant’s trial counsel was defic ient and, if s o , wh ether counsel’s defic ient perf orm ance prejudice d Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claim for habea s corpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved wi t h i n 9 0 d ay s of this order

. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwar ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. A ny extensions of time shall be obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: Mar ch 9, 2016 Do not publish
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2021-1732: Auris Health, Inc. v. Intuitive Surgical Operations - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QTsmVzlNpj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-11-2022-2021-1732-auris-health-inc-v-intuitive-surgical-operations-audio-uploaded\/\">2021-1732: Auris Health, Inc. v. Intuitive Surgical Operations<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-11-2022-2021-1732-auris-health-inc-v-intuitive-surgical-operations-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=QTsmVzlNpj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2021-1732: Auris Health, Inc. v. Intuitive Surgical Operations” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"QTsmVzlNpj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Auris Health, Inc. v. Intuitive Surgical Operations (mp3) Appeal Number: 2021-1732 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EC00-98-001]

Take notice that on June 20, 2000, Commonwealth Edison Company (ComEd) tendered for filing an amendment to the application it filed in this proceeding on May 31, 2000.

ComEd states that it has, by mail, served a copy of the amendment on the Illinois Commerce Commission and on other identified entities.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before July 11, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16840  Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Lega l Departmen t 362 0 Hack

s Cros s Roa

d Buildin g B , 3rd Floo r Memphis , T N 3812 5 Telephon e 901.434.860 0 

### RWiO M i i fesi' k- J 

### ^: * - • 

### l-iEAK;^^: G DOCKE T Expres s
VI A FEDE X May 4,201 0 Hearin g Docke t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S.W

. Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0

_ . ^ RE : Reques t

fo r Forma l Hearin g - FA A Cas e Number : 2009GL70035 4 / ^

. c ^ Dear Sir : I n respons e t o th e Fina l Notic e o f Propose dCivi l Penalty that was issue di nFA A cas e numbe r 2009GL70035 4 an dreceive db y my offic e o nApri l 29 , 2010 , Federa l Express , i naccordanc e wit h1 4 CF R13.16(g)(2)(ii) , respectfull y request s ahearin g i nthi s matter
. A cop y o f

thi s reques t

i s bein g sen t

t o Kat e Barber , Attorney , Great Lake s Region , Federal Aviatio n Administration

. Al l correspondenc e regardin g thi s matte r shoul db e sen t

t o my attentio nat

362 0 Hack s Cros s Road , 3r dFloor , Buildin g B , Memphis , Tennesse e 38125

. If ther e ar e an y questions , pleas e cal l m e at (901 ) 434-863 2 o r

emai l cefelts@fedex.com

. Very trul y yours , FEDERA LEXPRES S CORPORATIO N

Courtne y E

. Felt s Senio r Attorne y Regulatory Affair s (901)434-863 2 (901)434-8283(1 )
CEF/776884cc : Pat Oppenheimer

- Corporat e Safety , Federa l Expres s Davi dLittlejoh n - Corporate Safety , Federa l Expres s Kat e Barber , Attorne y - Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n Great Lake s Regio n 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e DesPlaines,I L6001 8
```

EXHIBIT 32.1

                           NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT, INC.
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, James J. McNamara, Chief Executive Officer of National Auto Credit, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Registrant"), in connection with the Registrant's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), do
hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/ James J. McNamara
--------------------------------------------
Name:  James J. McNamara
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  May 11, 2005
```
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2.2
AMENDMENT NO. 3
 TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
 DIRECTORS’ RETIREMENT PLAN
     Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 thereof, the Trinity Industries, Inc. Directors’ Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended effective as of December 15, 2005 in the following respects only:
     FIRST: A new Section 13 is added as follows:
     13. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, the interest in this Plan of each member of the Board of Directors as of December 15, 2005 who is not an employee of the Company and who has served as a director for ten or more years as of December 15, 2005 shall be terminated as of December 15, 2005 and each such director shall be paid before December 31, 2005 a lump sum as hereinafter provided. The lump sum payment shall be calculated by first determining an annual retainer projection by increasing the annual retainer in effect on December 15, 2005 of $40,000 by 4% for each year remaining between December 15, 2005 and May 15 of the year following such director’s 72 nd  birthday (the “Projected Annual Retainer Factor”) and second, discounting ten years of payments of the Projected Annual Retainer back to December 15, 2005 using a present value discount factor of 5%.
     SECOND: A new Section 14 is added as follows:
     14. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, the interest in this Plan of each member of the Board of Directors as of December 15, 2005 who was elected to the Board prior to August 9, 2005, who is not an employee of the Company, and who has served on the Board less than ten years as of December 15, 2005 and therefore not 100% vested pursuant to Section 3 of this Plan (the “Remaining Directors”), shall be terminated and paid a lump sum on the earlier to occur of retirement, death, a Change of Control as defined by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or after ten full years of service on the Board (the “Date of Calculation”) based on the vesting schedule as provide in Section 3 as of the Date of Calculation. The lump sum payment shall be calculated by first determining the Projected Annual Retainer; second, determining the vesting percentage as provided in Section 3 of this Plan; and third, discounting the ten years of payments of the Projected Annual Retainer back to the Date of Calculation, using a present value discount factor of 5%. Upon a Change of Control as defined by Section 409A of the Code, the Remaining Directors shall become 100% vested.
     THIRD: In all other respects, the terms of the Plan are ratified and confirmed.
 










 











     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of this 7th day of December, 2005.
	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	BY:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Vice President and Corporate Secretary
No. 11-1130.

#### Cyphers *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-1119.3 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

Pork and Pork By-Products 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

Effected by Exchange of Letters at 

Hanoi and Washington 

November 19, 2006 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

Trade: Pork and Pork By-Products 

 Agreement effected by exchange of letters 

 at Hanoi and Washington November 19, 2006; 

 Entered into force November 19, 2006. 
NOTE: At present, we do not have an official translation of this letter. Once the official translation is obtained, it will be added to this publication.
No. 11-9660.

#### Gray *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.