alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-345-000]


K N Wattenberg Transmission L.L.C; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

June 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 15, 2000, K N Wattenberg Transmission 
L.L.C. (KNW) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective 
August 1, 2000:

First Revised Sheet No. 85D
Second Revised Sheet No. 86
First Revised Sheet No. 86B
First Revised Sheet No. 86D
First Revised Sheet No. 87A
First Revised Sheet No. 87D

    KNW states that on February 9, 2000, the Commission issued its 
final rule regarding the regulations of short-term interstate natural 
gas transportation services in Docket Nos. RM98-10-000 and RM98-12-000 
(Order No. 637). In the instant filing, KNW is filing to implement 
provisions of Order No. 637 regarding the waiver of the rate ceiling 
for short-term capacity release transactions.
    KNW states that Order No. 637 provides for a waiver of the rate 
ceiling for short-term (less than one year) capacity release 
transactions until September 30, 2002 and requires pipelines to file 
tariff revisions within 180 days of the effective date of the rule, 
i.e., March 27, 2000, to remove tariff sheets as required. Unless 
extended by Commission action, the tariff provisions removing the price 
cap submitted herein shall not be effective after September 30, 2002, 
and KNW shall file revised tariff sheets as required.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16134 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-2144: SCHAEFFER v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"utZlyCIXGP\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-17-2022-22-2144-schaeffer-v-us-order-22-2144-order-11-17-2022_2034786\/\">22-2144: SCHAEFFER v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/11-17-2022-22-2144-schaeffer-v-us-order-22-2144-order-11-17-2022_2034786\/embed\/#?secret=utZlyCIXGP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-2144: SCHAEFFER v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"utZlyCIXGP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: SCHAEFFER v. US [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-2144 Origin: CFC Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
---

Chief Executive Officer 
  EXHIBIT 31(a)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANTTO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

I, George Solymar, chief executive officer of Hendrx Corp.
(Registrant) certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
(Report) of Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2007

*/s/ George Solymar*___________________ 
  George Solymar

---
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2021-1635: American Patents LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pMZWokeGrp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-08-2022-2021-1635-american-patents-llc-v-unified-patents-llc-audio-uploaded\/\">2021-1635: American Patents LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-08-2022-2021-1635-american-patents-llc-v-unified-patents-llc-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=pMZWokeGrp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2021-1635: American Patents LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"pMZWokeGrp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: American Patents LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC (mp3) Appeal Number: 2021-1635 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41467-41468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be

[[Page 41468]]

obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than July 19, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, 
Consumer Regulation Group), 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. Zions Bancorporation, Salt Lake City, Utah; to acquire Garban-
Intercapital plc, London, United Kingdom, and thereby engage in certain 
brokerage activities, pursuant to Sec. 225.28(b)(7) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 28, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-16836 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
p130204.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0204

Focus Ready Draft 1/31/2013

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1
p130204.eng

 

SAT (concerns) (01/18/2013):

Migration to groundwater: Slow

PBT rating: P2B1T1

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb), XB

Testing (No Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claims:

Page 2
p130204.eng

 

 

 

 

Page 3
p130204.eng

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0204

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 4
p130204.eng

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0204

 

Page 5
p130204.eng

 

 

 

 

Page 6
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"20-1948: CELLSPIN SOFT, INC. v. PANASONIC CORPORATION [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XutRAKatd5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-14-2022-20-1948-cellspin-soft-inc-v-panasonic-corporation-rule-36-judgment-20-1948-rule_36_judgment-10-14-2022_2018543\/\">20-1948: CELLSPIN SOFT, INC. v. PANASONIC CORPORATION [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/10-14-2022-20-1948-cellspin-soft-inc-v-panasonic-corporation-rule-36-judgment-20-1948-rule_36_judgment-10-14-2022_2018543\/embed\/#?secret=XutRAKatd5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“20-1948: CELLSPIN SOFT, INC. v. PANASONIC CORPORATION [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"XutRAKatd5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"RULE 36 JUDGMENT Posted: CELLSPIN SOFT, INC. v. PANASONIC CORPORATION [RULE 36 JUDGMENT](pdf) Appeal Number: 20-1948 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 742 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 742

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the provision 
   that reduces primary insurance amounts for individuals receiving 
                  pensions from noncovered employment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1999

 Mr. Sandlin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the provision 
   that reduces primary insurance amounts for individuals receiving 
                  pensions from noncovered employment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Benefits Restoration 
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF PROVISION THAT REDUCES PRIMARY INSURANCE AMOUNTS 
              FOR INDIVIDUALS RECEIVING PENSIONS FROM NONCOVERED 
              EMPLOYMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 215(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 415(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (7).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 215(d) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 415(d)) is 
        amended by striking paragraph (3).
            (2) Section 215(f) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 415(f)) is 
        amended by striking paragraph (9).
            (3) Subsections (e)(2) and (f)(3) of section 202 of such 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 402(e)(2), (f)(3)) are each amended by striking 
        ``section 215(f)(5), 215(f)(6), or 215(f)(9)(B)'' each place it 
        appears and inserting ``paragraph (5) or (6) of section 
        215(f)''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
benefits payable for months after December 1999, and the Commissioner 
of Social Security shall recompute primary insurance amounts 
(notwithstanding section 215(f) of the Social Security Act) to the 
extent necessary to carry out such amendments.
                                 <all>
```
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 863

To require appropriate off-budget treatment of Social Security in official

budget pronouncements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Mr. HERGER (for himself, Mr. MINGE, Mr. BASS, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. FRANKS of New

Jersey, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. MCCRERY,

Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. CRANE, and Mr. CAMPBELL) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition

to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To require appropriate off-budget treatment of Social

Security in official budget pronouncements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Budg5 eting and Investment Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 863 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVING SOCIAL SECURITY FROM BUDGET PRO2 NOUNCEMENTS.

3 Any official statement issued by the Office of Man4 agement and Budget, the Congressional Budget Office, or

5 any other agency or instrumentality of the Federal Gov6 ernment of surplus or deficit totals of the budget of the

7 United States Government as submitted by the President

8 or of the surplus or deficit totals of the congressional

9 budget, and any description of, or reference to, such totals

10 in any official publication or material issued by either of

11 such Offices or any other such agency or instrumentality,

12 shall exclude the outlays and receipts of the old-age, sur13 vivors, and disability insurance program under title II of

14 the Social Security Act (including the Federal Old-Age

15 and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Dis16 ability Insurance Trust Fund) and the related provisions

17 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

18 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

19 The provisions of section 2 shall apply with respect

20 to fiscal year 2000 and subsequent fiscal years, except

21 that the exclusion required under section 2 with respect

22 to receipts shall apply—

23 (1) for fiscal year 2000, only with respect to

24 the excess of total receipts over receipts consisting of

25 interest earned on investments of the Trust Funds

26 referred to in section 2, and
3

•HR 863 IH

1 (2) for fiscal year 2001, only with respect to

2 the excess of total receipts over 50 percent of re3 ceipts consisting of interest earned on investments of

4 such Trust Funds.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.7007 Establishing the Fabric. ( a ) The Commission shall create the Fabric, a common dataset of all locations in the United States where fixed broadband internet access service can be installed. The Fabric shall: ( 1 ) Contain geocoded information for each location where fixed broadband internet access service can be installed;
( 2 ) Serve as the foundation upon which all data relating to the availability of fixed broadband internet access service collected pursuant to the Broadband Data Collection shall be overlaid;
( 3 ) Be compatible with commonly used Geographical Information Systems (GIS) software; and
( 4 ) Be updated every 6 months by the Commission.
( b ) The Commission shall prioritize implementing the Fabric for rural and insular areas of the United States.
[85 FR 50907, Aug. 18, 2020, as amended at 89 FR 66268, Aug. 15, 2024]
#### § 60-30.31 Expedited hearings—when appropriate.

Expedited Hearings may be used, *inter alia,* when a contractor or subcontractor has violated a conciliation agreement; has not adopted and implemented an acceptable affirmative action program; has refused to give access to or to supply records or other information as required by the equal opportunity clause; or has refused to allow an on-site compliance review to be conducted.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.711 Formal or informal complaints.

Complaints filed against carriers under section 208 of the Communications Act may be either formal or informal.