## United States Environmental Protection Agency

General Permit for New or Modified Minor Sources of Air Pollution in Indian Country http://www.epa.gov/air/tribal/tribalnsr.html



## Background Document: General Air Quality Permit for New or Modified Minor
Source S tone Quarrying, Crushing, and Screening Facilities in Indian Country

Version 1.0
Last Modified: March 2 3 , 2015



### 1. S tone Quarrying, Crushing and Screening Source Category Definition

A stone quarrying, crushing, and screening (SQCS) facility is any stationary or portable non

- metallic mineral processing facility which uses rock crushers, grinding mills, screening operations, bucket elevators, belt conveyors, bagging operatio ns, storage bins, storage piles, truck loading stations, or railcar loading stations to process rock, sand, gravel, or mineral aggregate or that mines rock, stone, sand and gravel for construction. As diesel fuel is the most commonly used fuel at SQCS fac ilities, for the sake of simplicity, the permit is written to
exclude the use of the General Permit by sources that combust fuels other than diesel fuel/biodiesel. The proposed General Air Quality Permit for New or Modified Minor Source S tone Quarrying, Cr ushing, and Screening Facilities in Indian Country only covers SQCS operations that are located at New Source Review (NSR)

minor sources.



### 2. Source Category Characterization

The operations and equipment at a typical SQCS facility are described in AP 42 , Chapters 11.19.1, Sand and Gravel Processing and 11.19.2, Crushed Stone Processing and Pulverized Mineral Processing. 1 SQCS facilities are part of a larger industrial process where stone, sand, gravel, rock, and minerals are re moved from the earth and prepared for industrial, commercial and residential use. Quarried stone normally is delivered to the processing plant by truck, and is dumped into a hoppered feeder, usually a vibrating grizzly type, or onto screens. The
feeder or screens separate large boulders from finer rocks that do not require primary crushing, reducing the load to the primary crusher

. 2

In sand and gravel processing, deposits of sand and gravel are mined and processed with screens, washing, and
clarifiers to segregate the material into different particle sizes. Sometimes, crushing equipment is utilized to reduce particle sizes. In rock crushing operations, rock is loosened by drilling and blasting and then loaded by
front

- end loader or power shovel into large haul trucks that transport the material to the processing operations. Processing operations may include: crushing, screening, size classification, material handling and storage operations. Rock is loaded into bins and sent through screens, sorted for size, and conveyed to one or more rock
crushers until all of the raw material is reduced to the desired size

. Each crusher machine has associated screening and conveying equipment. After crushing, the rock is sorted according to size in screeners and conveyed t o storage piles by conveyors. Front end loaders and trucks are used to move finished materials

1 AP

- 42, Chapters 11.19.1, Sand and Gravel Processing and 11.19.2, Crushed Stone Pr ocessing and Pulverized Mineral Processing, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch11/index.html.

2 Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Point Source Committee (Joint EPA

– STAPPA/ALAPCO Initiative), “Technical Assessment Paper: Available Information for Estimating Emissions from Stone Mining and Qu arrying Operations,” May 1998. http://www.dep.wv.gov/daq/planning/inventory/Documents/EIIP%20V02%20Ch13%20Stone%2 0Mining%20and%20Quarr ying%20Operations.pdfPage 2 of 18

offsite. Rock types processed by the crushed stone industry include: limestone, granite, dolomite, traprock, sandstone, quartz, quartzite, and lesser amounts of calcareous marl, marble, shell, and slate.

Electricity for the motors running the crushers, screens, and conveyors is provided either by grid electric power or by diesel generators. Criteria pollutant emissions of concern are primarily particulate matter (PM) from crushing and screening, and particulate matter and nitrogen oxides (NO
x ) from diesel generators. For sources with available water, water sprays may be used to control particulate emissions. In sand processing, water is typically used in clarifie rs to sort the sand by size, and the sand is processed wet. Dry particulate control methods (baghouses) may also be used to control particulate emissions. 3 SQCS facilities are distributed almost uniformly around the country in proportion to population density, as the need for sand, gravel, and mineral aggregates is widespread, the technology is simple, and the barriers to starting a business are low. Information gathered from state permits indicates that this source category is not uniform in size or emissions.



### 3. State Minor Source Permit Programs

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) researched state air quality permitting websites for examples of

ge neral permits and permits by rule for sand and gravel facilities and rock crushing facilities. The EPA examined these documents for their applicability in developing a general permit for Indian Country. The EPA incorporated elements from these permits in d eveloping the documents and regulations in the General Permit for SQCS facilities. The EPA examined general permit documents for sand and gravel facilities for the States of Florida and
Indiana . The EPA also exam ined general permit documents for rock crushing and screening facilities for the
States of Alaska

, Arizona

, Florida

, Indiana

, Washington , and Wisconsin in developing this General Permit . The EPA chose general permits from these states because of characteristics they possess:

 Readily available;

 Clear throughput limits; and

 Organization of the regulations followed the typical form for federal NSR permits:

o Limitations and standards, and

o Monitoring, testing, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements.

Very few states issue air general permits for sand and gravel facilities. Although Indiana issues both a sand and gravel permit and a rock crushing permit, their respective throughput limits are nearly identical. Many states issue air general permits for rock crushing facilities, and the EPA found that other states general permits for rock crushing and screening facilities are similar in content to the permits from the states listed above. The state general permits for SQCS facilities vary from the streamlined (Indiana, at four pages) to the extremely detailed and complex (Arizona, at 104 pages). None of the state permits limit throughput based on co

- location with another source, such as a hot mix asphalt plant.

The state sand and gravel permits typically have throughput limits, but these var y by state. The assumptions and methodology for arriving at these throughput limitations are not discussed in the permit application documents, and, except for the Washington state rock crushing general permit, the technical support documents used in
devel oping the throughput limits are not readily available. The EPA assumes that each state is calculating the throughput limits based on different equipment configurations and control scenarios.

3 AP

- 42, Chapters 11.19.1, Sand and Gravel Processing and 11.19.2, Crushed Stone Pr ocessing and Pulverized Mineral Processing, http://www.epa.gov /ttn/chief/ap42/ch11/index.html

.Page 3 of 18

Most of the state sand and gravel permit applications mention th at the permit cannot be issued to sources whose potential to emit (PTE) of particulate matter 10 microns or less (PM 10 ), NO X , or carbon monoxide (CO) is greater than 100 tons per year (tpy). The applications do state that rock throughput, fuel throughput, and/or engine displacement shall be limited, but the methodology and emissions calculations underlying the relationship between the emission threshold(s) and the raw material throughput/fuel usage limit(s) are not clearly stated ( except for the Washington state rock crushing permit ) . However, it is clear that these rock throughput limits, fuel usage limits, and engine displacement limits are intended to keep emissions below the major source thresholds. The Alaska rock crushing permit contains no rock throug hput limits, but requires the applicant to calculate the PTE of their facility to verify that it is below 100 tpy prior to submitting the application. Similarly, the Florida sand and gravel permit does not contain any raw material throughput limits, but me rely requires that the facility’s PTE be less than 100 tpy for any criteria pollutant. However, these two permits are an exception. The state permits typically limit raw materials throughput and fuel usage as a surrogate for limiting

emissions.

As previou sly mentioned, many of the state permits regulate emissions from engines, but the type of regulation varies. Some state permits that regulate combustion emissions (Alaska and Arizona) delineate between stationary engines and nonroad (portable) engines. 4 Th ey do not regulate combustion emissions from the engines at rock crushing facilities which change location more frequently than once per year because, by definition, those engines are nonroad (portable) engines. They also do not regulate the amount of fuel used by mobile sources, such as trucks and front end loaders. The Florida and Wisconsin rock crushing permits do regulate combustion emissions, but assume that all combustion is from stationary engines. For all of the state permits mentioned here, combust ion emissions from stationary engines at rock crushing facilities are regulated by limiting the amount of fuel that can be combusted per year, or the engine displacement. The fuel usage limits vary from state to state, and underlying calculations are not p rovided, so it is not clear what the intended emissions limit is for each state permit. The Indiana and Washington state permits do not regulate combustion

emissions.

Most state permits (Arizona, Florida, Indiana, Washington, and Wisconsin) require contro l of particulate emissions, but the Alaska permit does not. In Alaska, the water sprays typically used to control particulate may freeze on the aggregate and the equipment, creating unsafe and unworkable conditions. All state sand and gravel permits requir e that the operator have a fugitive dust control plan and that fugitive emissions from roadways and storage piles be controlled. The Alaska permit qualifies this and requires fugitive emissions control if the facility is within 1,000 feet of a residence. T he State of Washington conducted dispersion modeling for a rock crusher processing 5,300,000 tons of material per year, and determined that a 150 foot setback from the rock crusher to the property lines would ensure no violation of the 24

- hour National Amb ient Air Quality
Standards for PM 10 ( 150 μg/m 3 )

. 5 The state permit for Alaska contains a 400 foot setback provision for the crusher and any diesel engine from the nearest residence. All of the state sand and gravel permits include opacity limitations, most require an operation and maintenance plan, and all include some variation of the monitoring and recordkeeping requirements found in typical minor source permits. The South Coast Air Quality Management District of California provides a comprehensive set of regulations 6 for control of fugitive dust in

4 Stationary engines include all internal

- combustion engines that are used either in a fixed application, or in a portable (or transportable) application in which the engine will stay at a single site for at least a full year. “Emission Regulations for

Stat ionary and Mobile Engines” US EPA, EPA420

- F

- 02

- 034, September 2002.

5 Washington State Dept. of Ecology, “Suitability of Rock Crushing Operations for Air Quality General Order of Approval: Evaluation of Control Technology, Ambient Impacts, and Potential Ap proval Criteria

, ” June 2006.

6 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 1157 “PM10 Emission Reductions from Aggregate and Related Operations

, ” http://www.aqmd.gov/rules/reg/reg11/r1157. pdf

.Page 4 of 18

areas of serious or severe nonattainment for PM 10 and particulate matter 2.5 microns or less (PM 2.5 ). A fugitive dust control plan is included in the permit.

Sever al of the state general permits incorporate the requirements of New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Subpart OOO ( Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants ) into the text of the permit,
while other states (Florida, Indiana) incorporate the Subpart OOO requirements by reference. Requirements for

NSPS Subpart IIII (Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines)
and National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Subpart ZZZZ (National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines) are not generally included in state permits for sand and gravel facilities.



### 4. Requirements for General Permits

4.1 Documents for General Permits

The EPA developed a standardized set of permit documents in support of the General Permit for SQCS facilities
located in Indian c ountry. These consist of the following documents:

 Questionnaire : Assists the facility owner or operator in determining whether they are eligible for a General Air Quality Permit;

 Request for Coverage u nder the General Air Quality Permit : States the criteria for qualification, gathers information on the source, the facility’s actual emissions for those sources undergoing modifications, facility location, and source contact, and requests technical information on facility equipment, through put, and attainment status;

 Instructions : Guides the applicant in filling out the Request for Coverage under the General Air Quality Permit;

 General Air Quality Permit, Terms and Conditions : Contains the requirements and regulations with
which the source m ust comply. The emission limitations, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements are in the permit, including requirements for sources located in nonattainment areas; and

 PTE Calculator S preadsheet : Allows applicants to calculate their PTE, based on owner inputs of the specific equipment present at their source, assuming continuous operation throughout the year. The PTE Calculator spreadsheet generates potential emissions, based on these inputs. The spreadsheet
illustrates the correlation between equipment, raw material throughput, and emissions

.

4.2 Exemption and Qualification for General Permits

Facilities applying for the General Permit must meet the emission limitations established for the General Permit

.

New facilities with a PTE ( or modifications to existing facilities with an increase in potential emissions ) lower than the minor NSR thresholds specified in the provisions of the Federal Indian Country Minor NSR Rule at 40 CFR 49.153 are exempt from the minor NSR program. The minor NSR thresholds are listed in Table 1 below. Facilities applying for the General Permit may calculate their PTE using the PTE calculator provided to determine if they are below these thresholds and , thus, exempt from the minor NSR program.Page 5 of 18 Table 1: Minor NSR Thresholds in 40 CFR 49.153

Pollutant Attainment Area Nonattainment Area

CO 10 tons per year ( tpy ) 5 tpy

PM 10 tpy 5 tpy

PM 10 5 tpy 1 tpy

PM 2.5 3 tpy 0.6 tpy Sulfur Dioxide ( SO 2 ) 10 tpy 5 tpy

NO X 10 tpy 5 tpy Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) 5 tpy 2 tpy

Under EPA policy, true and synthetic minor NSR sources qualify for the General Permit

. F acilities will be required to compare their PTE to the NSR major source thresholds to determine if they qualify for the General Permit

. Th e NSR major source threshold for attainment areas is 250 tpy of any criteria pollutant. The NSR major source
threshold s for nonattainment areas are summarized in Table 2 below:

Table 2: NSR Major Source Thresholds for Nonattainment Areas
Pollutant Nonattainment Classification NSR Major Source Threshold

Ozone Marginal 100 tpy of VOC or NO X

Moderate 100 tpy of VOC or NO X Serious 50 tpy of VOC or NO X Severe 25 tpy of VOC or NO X Extreme 10 tpy of VOC or NO X

PM 10 Moderate 100 tpy

Serious 70 tpy

CO Moderate 100 tpy

Serious 50 tpy

SO 2 , NOx, PM 2.5 No nonattainment classification 100 tpy

If the facility’s PTE is above the NSR major source threshold of 250 tpy, or above the applicable nonattainment area thresholds listed in Table 2 ( for any pollutant for which the area in which the source is locating or modifying is designated nonattainment ), then the facility does not qualify for the General Permit

. Sources that will be synthetic minor sources and relying on the conditions in the General Permit to qualify as minor sources should
use the conditions in the General Permit (such as limits on production and throughput) to determine their PTE and eligibility for the General Permit . However, until coverage under the General Permit is obtained, the source is a major source. The following documents are available to assist sources in the screening and application

process:

 Questionnaire;

 Request for Coverage under the General Air Quality Permit ;

 Instructions for the Request for Coverage under the General Air Quality Permit ; and

 PTE calculator

.

For facilities not exempt from the minor NSR program and having a PTE below the NSR major source thresholds, the facilities will further evaluate if they could meet the throughput limits and operating requirements
established in this General Permit . The sp ecific requirements for the General Permit are discussed in SectionsPage 6 of 18

4.3 and 4. 4 . The emissions associated with the throughput limits are lower than the NSR major source
thresholds and were derived as described below in Section 5.

4.3 Specific Permit Requ irements for General Permits

T he terms and conditions of the General Permit were established according to the required permit content and analyses in the Federal Indian Country Minor NSR Rule . The required permit content is listed in 40 CFR 49.155(a)

– What information must my permit include? Below we describe the basis for the permit conditions.

40 CFR 49.155(a)(1)

– General Requirements The rule establishes general requirements that each permit must identify: the effective date of the permit; the
date by which the owner/operator must commence construction in order for the permit to remain valid; the emission units subject to the permit and their associated emission limitations; and monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements to assure complia nce with the emission limitations.

The General Permit contains all of this required information, except for the emission units subject to the permit. Because of the nature of general permits we believe it is more appropriate to identify the emission unit s covered by the General Permit in the Approval of the Request for Coverage. The General Permit incorporates the Approval of the Request for Coverage into the General Permit . Each permit contains a separate section that specifically identifies the emission limitations and standards, monitoring and testing, recordkeeping, and reporting and notification requirements.

CFR 49.155(a)(2)

– Emission Limitations The permit must contain the emission limitations determined by the reviewing authority under 40 CFR 49. 154(c) for each affected emissions unit. 40 CFR 49.154(c)

– How will the reviewing authority determine the emission limitations that will be required in my permit?

– identifies the case

- by

- case control technology review that must be used by the reviewing a uthority to determine the appropriate level of control. In carrying out the case

- by

case control technology review, the reviewing authority must consider the following factors:

1. Local air quality conditions;

2. Typical control technology or other emission red uction measures used by similar sources in surrounding

areas; 3. Anticipated economic growth in the area; and

4. Cost

- effective emission reduction alternatives.

In addition, the reviewing authority must require a numerical limit on the quantity, rate or concent ration of emissions for each regulated NSR pollutant emitted by each affected emissions unit, for which such a limit is technically feasible. The emission limitation required may also be included as pollution prevention techniques, design standards, equipm ent standards, work practices, operational standards or any combination thereof. However, the emission limitations must assure that each affected emission unit will comply with all requirements of 40 CFR parts 60, 61, and 63

, as well as any federal or trib al implementation plans that apply to the unit. Finally, the emission limitations required may not rely on a stack height that exceeds good engineering practice or any other dispersion technique, except as allowed by 40 CFR 51.118(b)

.

To address the requ irements for establishing emission limitations

, the following consideration were used for setting the limits in the General Permit for S Q CS facilities:Page 7 of 18

1. Local air quality conditions

– To address this requirement, the General Permit requires sources locating

in ozone and carbon monoxide nonattainment areas to meet more stringent requirements on fuel use

– the main source of CO, NO x , and VOC emissions at S Q CS facilities. This will also ensure these sources are not major sources in tho se areas. Also, PM emission may be a concern for S Q CS facilities, but the majority of those emissions are fugitive. The permit contains a requirement to take corrective action if fugitive dust is visible beyond the property line. This will aid in reducing the local PM air quality impacts.

2. Typical control technology or other emission reduction measures used by similar sources in surrounding

areas

– For sources locating in attainment areas we looked at the control requirements specified by 40 CFR parts 60, 61 and 63. These regulations establish minimum technology and emission limitations that must be met nationally and also meet the requirements of 40 CFR 49.154(c)(4) to ensure compliance with parts 60, 61, and 63. For this General Permit we considered regul ations that apply to the equipment at SQCS facilities:

 40 CFR 60 Subpart OOO

– Standards of Performance for Nonmetall i c Mineral Processing
Facilities ;

 40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb

– Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or
Modification Commenced after July 23, 1984 ;

 40 CFR 60 Subpart IIII

– Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines ; and

 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ

– National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutions for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

.

These regulations cover emissions from the followi ng equipment at SQCS facilities:

 Engines ;

 Material handling equipment ; and

 Fuel storage tanks

.

The General Terms and Conditions in the General Permit are a standardized set of boilerplate conditions included with general permits. The conditions in the Specific Terms and Conditions section of the General Permit are developed from the Federal Indian Country Minor NSR Rule, NSPS, NESHAP, and the state permit examples.

The derivation of applicability thresholds and the production and fuel usage limits in t he applicability questionnaire, application, and conditions in the General Permit are discussed fully in Section 5. The minor NSR thresholds are based on provisions of the Federal Indian Country Minor NSR Rule at 40 CFR 49.153 and are also discussed fully in Section 5.

Review of the regulations and other existing general permits resulted in permit conditions requiring emissions from all crushers, screens, drop points, and other possible release points to be controlled by wet suppression, limiting fugitive emissions from crushers to 12% opacity, limiting fugitive emissions from all other processes to 7% opacity, requiring fugitive emissions to be controlled by a fugitive dust control plan, requiring new stationary engines to be certified to Tier standards, and requiring existing stationary engines to meet maintenance requirements, a 49 ppm CO at 15% O 2 limit, or a 23 ppm CO at

15% O 2 limit based on engine size.Page 8 of 18

In addition, the stationary engines are limited to using diesel and biodiesel as fuels. All liquid fuels are limited to no more than 0.0015 percent sulfur by weight. These conditions represent the standard fuels used for this equipment and the standard sul fur content these fuels must attain. Although we reviewed the NSPS requirements for tanks, we did not include any limits in the permit as the tanks used by S Q CS facilities will not need to meet the control requirements of the NSPS. The questionnaire limits eligibility
for the General Permit to tanks less than 151m 3 that store liquids with a true maximum vapor pressure less than 4.0 psi.

The General Permit includes the following requirements from the applicable NSPS and NESHAP requirements:

 40 CFR 60.674(b)

– requirements for wet suppression systems;

 Table 2 to Subpart OOO of 40 CFR 60

– requirements for fugitive emissions;

 40 CFR 60.4204 and 60.4201(a)

– certification to Tier standards;

 40 CFR 62.6603, 63.6640, and Table 2d to 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZ Z

– Emission limitation and operating standards;

 40 CFR 63.6612, 63.6625, 63.6630 and Table 5 to 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ

– Initial compliance requirements;

 40 CFR 63.6640 and Table 6 to 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ

– Continuous compliance requirements;
and

 40 CFR 63.6604

– fuel requirements.

3. Anticipated eco nomic growth in the area

– The r eviewing a uthority may consider anticipated economic growth when determining whether coverage under the General Permit is justifiable. Considering, however, that the General Perm it sets emission standards that are consistent with what is required by

S Q CS facilities across the country in both attainment and nonattainment areas, we expect that this will rarely be a factor.

4. Cost

- effective emission reduction alternatives

– The Gener al Permit sets emission standards that are consistent with what is required by S Q CS facilities across the country, based on the particular attainment status where the source is locating. As such, the chosen technologies are considered widely
available and consideration of more cost

- effective alternatives is not necessary at this time. We intend to periodically review technology costs in the future to determine when more stringent, cost

- effective technologies become widely available.

5. Co

- l ocation with anothe r source

– The General Permit allows for a SQCS facility to be co

- located with a hot mix asphalt ( HMA ) plant also operating under a g eneral p ermit. In addition, sources may request to take voluntarily lower material throughput limits to keep a co

- located source below the Title V
threshold. The material throughput limits and fuel consumption limits for co

- located SQCS and HMA plants are specified in th e respective permits.

40 CFR 49.155(a)(3)

– Monitoring Requirements
The General Permit must include monitoring that is sufficient to assure compliance with the emission limitations that apply to the source. The General Permit requires monitoring that assures that the wet suppression system is operating properly, that a visible emissions survey is conducted on a weekly basis, that fugitive emissions surveys are conducted weekly, and that stationary engines with oxidation cataly st monitor the inlet temperaturePage 9 of 18

and pressure drop. The General Permit also requires initial and continuing testing of compliance with the opacity
limits.

40 CFR 49.155(a)(4)

– Recordkeeping Requirements
The General Permit must include recordkeeping that is sufficient to assure compliance with the emission limitations and monitoring requirements, including certain statements listed in 40 CFR 49.155(a)(4)(i) and (ii). In addition to the recordkeeping requirements in 40 CFR 49.155(a)(4)(i), the General Permi t also requires records of the amount of crushed rock, sand, and gravel produced each month, monthly fuel use, visible emission surveys, fugitive emission surveys, corrective actions taken, results of corrective actions taken, results of source tests, main tenance activities of stationary engines, and oxidation catalyst performance data, as applicable, for stationary engines.

40 CFR 49.155(a)(5)

– Reporting Requirements
The General Permit includes the reporting requirements listed in 40 CFR 49.155(a)(5)(i) and (ii) related to annual reports and reporting of deviations.

40 CFR 49.155(a)(6)

– Severability Clause
The General Permit includes a severability clause to ensure the continued vali dity of the other portions of the permit in the event of a challenge to a portion of the permit.

40 CFR 49.155(a)(7)

– Additional Provisions
The General Permit contains the additional provision required for each permit. These conditions are found in the

G eneral Provisions of the General Permit

.

4. 3.1 Requirements for Sources Located in Nonattainment Areas

We did not include any additional requirements for sources locating in ozone nonattainment areas, other than
the limits on monthly fuel use. We are n ot aware of any more stringent s tate/local control requirements for
SQCS facilities in nonattainment areas. The limits on monthly fuel use will ensure that the General Permit applies to minor sources locating in these nonattainment areas.

4. 4 Information on Completing Screening Processes that Have to Be Satisfied to Request Coverage under the General Permit

P rior to obtaining coverage under this General Permit , sources must satisfactorily complete the screening process es that the EPA has provided to address : (1) t h e p r o t e c t i o n o f an y an d al l s p e ci es t ha t

a re feder all y

- li s t ed a s threatened or e n d an gered u n der t h e Endangered Species Act ( E S A ) o r o f habi t a t

t ha t i s feder all y

- de s i g na t ed a s “c r i t ic a l hab i t a t ” u n der t h e E S A ; and (2) t h e p o t e n t ia l t o ca u se effe c t s t o hi s t o r i c p r o p er t i e s (pursuant to the N ational Historic Preservation Act )

. Attached to the R equest for Coverage Forms for the general permits

, the EPA provides guidance t o a s s i s t sources i n completing these processes

.Page 10 of 18



### 5. Emission Limitations 7 

### and Surrogate Throughput Limits

5.1 Developing the Surrogate Limits and Limitations

The General Permit includes a rock, sand, and gravel throughput limit that applies to sources in both attainment and nonattainment areas that serves as a surrogate emis sions limitation. The General Permit also includes surrogate fuel use limits that apply based on the particular ozone attainment or nonattainment classification in the area the source will locate. These surrogate limits correspond to a particular tpy emiss ion rate, as discussed
below.

The tpy emission rates used to determine eligibility for the General Permit for sources located in attainment and nonattainment areas corresponds to the source

- wide PTE at which a source would become a major source and subjec t to Title V permitting (referred to hereafter as “the Title V major source threshold”). In attainment areas,
the Title V major source threshold is 100 tpy for any criteria pollutant, 10 tpy for a single hazardous air pollutant (HAP), and 25 tpy for any combination of HAPs. The Title V major source threshold in nonattainment areas varies by the pollutant and the nonattainmen t classification.

The rock, sand and/or gravel throughput limit was established based on the Title V major source thresholds and assumptions about the equipment configuration at a “typical” rock, sand and/or gravel crushing facility. The assumptions about equipment configuration have a significant impact on the level of pollutants emitted. The rock, sand and/or gravel crushing permit materials from only two states (Indiana and Washington) contained information on the equipment configurations used in determ ining the PTE and rock throughput limits. The Indiana permit had figures for the number of crushing and screening machines for three different permit levels, but there was no information on other equipment (conveyors, storage piles, loading and unloading, etc) or how the emissions are calculated. The technical support document for the Washington Department of Ecology rock crushing permit contains more information on equipment and emissions calculations. The Washington Department of Ecology surveyed rock cru shing operations and found that a typical rock crusher had three crushers, three screens, and six conveying operations. Their calculations include emissions from this equipment, as well as transfer operations and haul roads. The “typical facility” calculat ions supporting this General Permit use this same equipment configuration, and also include emissions from storage piles and truck unloading and loading o perations. The EPA developed a l imit c alculator spreadsheet of PTE calculations showing pollutant

emis sions for the emission units at the “typical” rock, sand and/or gravel crushing and screening facility described above using AP 42 emission factors. Since AP 42 emission factors are not available for all types of operations at a rock, sand and/or gravel cr ushing facility, the EPA estimated some emission factors for primary and secondary crushing and screening, based on existing emission factors for tertiary crushing and screening and the relative surface area of the rock produced in each process. The calcul ations for these estimated emission factors are included in the PTE Calculator and Limit Calculator spreadsheets. The EPA then used the Limit Calculator spreadsheet to calculate the materials throughput limits for the SQCS General Permit , based on the

emis sion limitations.

Chapter 11.19.1 (Sand and Gravel Processing) of AP 42 does not contain emission factors for the materials handling operations that occur at sand and gravel plants. The discussion in AP 42 on sand processing plants
indicates that this ma terial is excavated in a wet condition, and is processed with water. Under these conditions, particulate emissions would be minimal. In contrast, rock, sand and/or gravel crushing operations process a raw

7 The definition of emission limitation used in this Background Document is the one provided in the Federal Indian Country NSR rule (described in Section 4.3) and includes requirements established by the reviewing authority that relate to the operatio n of a source, which allows for the use of production throughput limits.Page 11 of 18

material that is dry and releases additional fine p articulate matter when it is crushed, screened and handled. Emission factors for rock crushing operations have been developed, and emission estimates can be quantified, based on the amount of material and the steps in the process. The materials throughput limits in this General

Permit are based on emissions from rock crushing, not sand and gravel processing. As there are no particulate emission factors for wet sand and gravel processing, no upper throughput limit for sand processing can be
calculated. The r aw materials limits in the General Permit , which are based on the particulate emissions from a specific configuration of rock crushing equipment, have been used for sand and gravel plants.

Although fuel usage limits are included in the permit, it is unknown whether an SQCS facility issued a general permit would be restricted by the fuel limit. Stationary rock crushers typically use utility electric power, while portable rock crushers use gen erators, which are nonroad engines. Nonroad engines are not subject to the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program

, Title V , or NSPS Subpart IIII, unless the engines remain in one place for more than one year, in which case they become stationary e ngines. For purposes of developing the
General Permit , no limits have been included precluding the rock crushers from remaining in place for more than one year, so emissions from any stationary engines are counted when considering the pollutant thresholds.

The General Permit includes the rock throughput and fuel usage limits listed in Table 6 for SQCS plants located in

attainment , unclassifiable or attainment/unclassifiable areas and nonattainment areas. The production limits and fuel usage limits for atta inment , unclassifiable or attainment/unclassifiable areas and nonattainment areas

are set at different levels because the EPA has selected different emissions limitations for attainment

, unclassifiable or attainment/unclassifiable areas and nonattainment areas. The rock throughput and fuel usage
limits are set at levels intended to keep the sources emissions below the NSR major source thresholds in Table 2, with an adequate margin to account for other pollutants emitted by the source. Ta ble 3 shows the emission
rates used to determine the rock throughput and fuel usage limits in the permit for SQCS facilities located alone

. PM 10 is the controlling pollutant

. T he throughput calculations are contained in Attachment A. Table 4 shows the

emis sion rates used to determine the rock throughput and fuel usage limits in the permit for SQCS facilities co

located with HMA plants.

Table 3: Emission Rates Used to Determine Production and Fuel Usage Limitations for Stone Quarrying, Crushing and Screening Facilities Located Alone
Pollutant of
Concern Attainment , Unclassifiable or Attainment/Unclassifiable Areas Nonattainment Areas

CO 19 tpy 19 tpy (moderate and serious areas)

PM 10 * 63 tpy 63 tpy (moderate and serious areas)

PM 2.5 * 63 tpy 63 tpy

NO X 88 tpy 88 tpy (marginal and moderate ozone areas)

45 tpy (serious ozone areas)

22.5 tpy (severe ozone areas)

9 tpy (extreme ozone areas)

VOC 7 tpy 7 tpy (ozone areas)

*Note: The emission thresholds for these pollutants include fugitive emissions.Page 12 of 18 Table 4 : Emission Rates Used to Determine Production and Fuel Usage Limitations for Stone Quarrying, Crushing and Screening Facilities Co

- Located with Hot Mix Asphalt Facility

Pollutant of

Concern Attainment , Unclassifiable or

Attainment/Unclassifiable

Areas Nonattainment Areas

CO 78 tpy 78 tpy (moderate areas) Not applicable (serious areas)

PM 10 6 3 tpy 6 3 tpy (moderate areas)
6 3 t py (serious areas)

PM 2.5 30 tpy 30 tpy
SO 2 18 tpy 18 tpy

NO X 90 tpy Not applicable (serious and above ozone areas)

90 tpy (marginal and moderate ozone areas)

VOC 27 tpy Not applicable (serious and above ozone areas)

27 tpy (marginal and moderate ozone areas)

5.2 Emission Limitations

T wo considerations form the basis for the upper eligibility emission limitations for general permits:

1. Are there any EPA regulation

- based emission limitations?

2. Where do state programs establish eligibility limits?

5.2.1 EPA Regulation

- Based Emissions Limita tions

The only EPA regulation

- based emissions limitations for rock crushing and screening facilities are the emission limitations from the exhaust of affected facilities equipped with capture systems of 0.014 grains per dry
standard cubic foot of exhaust . Affected facilities are each crusher, grinding mill, screening operation, bucket elevator, belt conveyor, bagging operation, storage bin, enclosed truck or railcar loading station. In general, facilities in attainment areas with PTE of any criteria pollu tant equal or greater than 250 tpy are NSR major sources. Facilities with PTE of any criteria pollutant equal to or greater than 100 tpy or HAP emissions greater than 10 tpy for a single HAP and 25 tpy for total HAPs are subject to Title V operating permit program.

5.2. 2 State Program Limits

The upper limits in state permits vary in that they either limit pollutant emissions or raw material and fuel throughput. Only the Indiana permit limits both emissions and raw material throughput. Indiana limits emis sions
of PM 10 from smaller SQCS facilities to less than 25 tpy, and limits emissions of PM 10 from large facilities to less than 100 tpy. Alaska and Florida limit PM 10 emissions to less than 100 tpy. As mentioned previously, the rock throughput limits corre sponding to the 100 tpy limit on PM 10 emissions vary from state to state, and thePage 13 of 18

underlying assumptions and calculations are not explicitly stated. Since nearly all states require control of emissions from rock crushing equipment, and fugitive emissions a s well, this may account for some of the variation seen in throughput limits from state to state. The Alaska permit 8 does not contain throughput limits, but instead requires that applicants calculate their PTE of PM 10

. This is a source

- specific approach, and requires skilled permitting staff to verify that the calculations are accurate. The Indiana rock crushing permit 9 , with its 100 tpy limit on PM 10 emissions, and similar emission control requirements, sets the throug hput threshold at 3,000,000 tpy. The Wisconsin general permit 10 is similar to the Indiana general permit in that it has a 100 tpy
limit on PM 10 emissions, emission control requirements, and sets the throughput limit at 250,000 tons per month (equivalent to 3,000,000 tpy). A comparison of requirements for attainment and nonattainment areas is not possible due to lack of a distinction made in most state programs. The Arizona general permit 11 limits
emissions of PM 10 to 13.64 tpy, but this may be due to the fact that nearly half of the counties in Arizona have been designated nonattainment for PM 10 . The Arizona permit is one example of a SQCS permit designed for an area designated as nonattainment for PM 10 . Table 5 shows the limits imposed by rock crushing and sc reening permits for the states reviewed.

Table 5 : State Rock Crushing and Screening Permit Throughput Limits and Emission Limitations

State Rock

Throughput
Limits Criteria

Pollutant
Emission
Limitations Engine Fuel

or Size Limit Setback

Required? Fugitive

Dust Controls Required? Particulate

Emissions
Controls Required?

Alaska Min: 5 tons per

hour

Max: None All:

100 tpy Less than

1,100 bhp 1,000 f ee t No No

Arizona Min: 25 tons per

hour

Max: None PM 10 : 13.64

tpy
NO X , CO: 90
tpy None None Yes Yes

Florida Min: None

Max: None All:

100 tpy 275,000 gal

diesel/year None Yes Yes

Indiana (small) Min: None

Max: 1,000,000
tpy PM 10 :

25 tpy None None Yes Yes

Indiana (large) Min: None

Max: 3,000,000
tpy PM 10 :

100 tpy None None Yes Yes

Washington Min: None

Max: 14,500 tons per day, 1,500,000 tpy None None 150 f ee t Yes Yes

8 For more information, go to: http://dec.alaska.gov/air/ap/docs/MG9%20Final%20Permit%204

- 8

- 09.pdf

. 9 For more information, go to: http://www.in.gov/idem/5157.htm#oaq_permits_ssoa

. 10 For more information, go to: http://dn r.wi.gov/files/PDF/pubs/am/AM381.pdf

. 11 For more information, go to: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/permits/download/gncspermit.pdf

.Page 14 of 18

State Rock

Throughput
Limits Criteria

Pollutant
Emission
Limitations Engine Fuel

or Size Limit Setback

Required? Fugitive

Dust Controls Required? Particulate

Emissions
Controls Required?

Wisconsin Min: None

Max: 250,000 tons per month PM 10 :

100 tpy 20,000

gal/month (6,870 gal/month in

ozone non

attainment area) None Yes Yes

5.3 Calculating the Surrogate Throughput Limits

For new or modified SQCS facilities, the Title V major source thresholds are used as the emission rates for calculating throughput limits , with an adequate margin to account for other pollutants emitted by the source

. The EPA evaluated the emission rates at which a new or modified source would become a major source under
Title V . This is 100 tpy for PM 10 , PM 2.5 , NO X , VOC, and CO in attainment areas (the tpy number varies for nonattainment areas for these pollutants)

. The EPA establish ed limits for PM 10 , PM 2.5 , NO X , and CO to meet the
emission rates in Table 3 of this document . The EPA back

- calculated the throughput of materials and usage of fuels that yielded emissions at these limits by using the equipment profile from the Washington Department of Ecology permit support document and emission factors from AP 42, Chapter 11.9.2 . These results are shown in
Table 6 for SQCS facilities located alone . PM 10 and NO X are the limiting pollutants. The equivalent materials throughput and fuel usage limits are incorporated into the permit documents as the upper limits for materials through put and fuel usage for attainment and nonattainment areas. Using these limits will also ensure that major source NSR will not be triggered for any new or modified source. Sample calculations showing the methodology used are in Attachment C.

Table 6 : Surrogate Rock Throughput and Fuel Usage Upper Limits for a SQCS Facility Located Alone

Attainment Status Upper Rock Throughput Limit ( tons per month ) Upper Fuel Usage Limit (gallons per
month )
Ozone Attainment , Unclassifiable and Attainment/Unclassifiable Area s and Marginal/Moderate Areas for Ozone 1,100,000 24,200

Serious Nonattainment Area s for Ozone 1,100,000 12,000

Severe Nonattainment Area s for Ozone 1,100,000 5

, 5 00

Extreme Nonattainment Area s for Ozone 1,100,000 1,900

The EPA used the same procedures for calculating the equivalent materials throughput and fuel usage limits for
a SQCS operation co

- located with a HMA operation and voluntarily ta king lower limits to avoid the Title V

program . These limits are incorporated into the permit documents as the upper limits for materials throughput and fuel usage for co

- located SQCS/HMA plants. These results are shown in Table 7

.Page 15 of 18 Table 7 : Surrogate Rock Throughput and Fuel Usage Upper Limits

for a SQCS Facility Co

- Located with a HMA Plant

Upper Rock Throughput Limit ( tons per month ) Upper Fuel Usage Limit (gallons per
month )
730,000 18,275Page 16 of 18



### References

40 CFR 49.1

– 40 CFR 49.173, Indian Country Air Quality Planning and Management. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR

- 2011

- title40

- vol1/pdf/CFR

- 2011

- title40

- vol1

- part49.pdf

40 CFR 52.21, Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Qua lity. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR

- 2007

- title40

- vol3/xml/CFR

- 2007

- title40

- vol3

- sec52

- 21.xml

40 CFR Part 60, Subpar t IIII, Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines. http: //ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text

idx?c=ecfr&sid=f2c4f71bd50d2a8883adafec36732010&rgn=div6&view=text&node=40:6.0.1.1.1.98&idno=40

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO, Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants

. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CFR

- 2012

- title40

- vol7/CFR

- 2012

- title40

- vol7

- part60

- subpartOOO/content

detail.html

40 CFR Part 63, Subpar t ZZZZ, Nat ional Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE). http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/ text/text

- idx?c=ecfr&rgn=div6&view=text&node=40:13.0.1.1.1.1&idno=40

Alaska Dep artment of Environmental Conservation, “Minor General Permit 9 for Rock Crushers

. ” http://www.dec.state.ak.us/air/ap/docs/MG9%20Final%20Permit%204

- 8

- 09.pdf

AP 42, Fifth Edition, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1: Stationary Point and Area Sources

, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/

Arizona Dep artment of Environmental Quality, “Crushing and Screening General Permit .” http://www.azde q.gov/environ/air/permits/class.html#general

Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Point Source Committee (Joint EPA

– STAPPA/ALAPCO Initiative), “Technical Assessment Paper: Available Information for Estimating Emissions from Stone Mining and Quarryin g Operations,” May 1998. http://www.dep.wv.gov/daq/planning/inventory/Documents/EIIP%20V02%20Ch13%20Stone%20Mining%20an d%20Quarrying%20Operations.pdf

Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 127, July 1, 2011, Pages 38748

- 38808, “Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country; F inal Rule” (Indian Country NSR Rule)

. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR

- 2011

- 07

- 01/pdf/2011

- 14981.pdf

Florida Dep artment of Environmental Protection, “Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plant (Crusher) Air General Permit Registration Form

. ” http://www.dep.state.fl.us/air/emission/mineral.htm

Indiana Departmen t of Environmental Management, “ OA

- 08 Crushed Stone Processing Plants

. ” http://www.in.gov/idem/5157.htm#oaq_permits_gsd

South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 1157 “PM 10 Emis sion Reductions from Aggregate and Related Operations

. ” http://www.aqmd.gov/rules/reg/reg11/r1157.pdfPage 17 of 18

Washington Dep artment of Ecology, “Suitability of Rock Crushing Operations for Air Quality General Order of Approval

. ” http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/air/AOP_Permits/Boiler/TTODd/ PDFS/ROCKCRUSHER.PDF

Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources, “Air Program Fact Sheet

- General Permits for Crushers

. ” http://dnr.wi.gov/files/PDF/pubs/am/AM381.pdfPage 18 of 18 Attachment A: Sample Emissions Calculations for Rock Throughput and Fuel Usage
Limits for Ozone Attainment and Nonattainment Areas for SQCS Facilities Located Alone

Emissions from Crushing, Screening, and Conveying:

Type of Operation Emission Factors (lb s /ton)

PM 10 Truck Unloading

– Fragmented Stone 0.000016 Primary Crushing 0.00014 Screening of Primary Crusher Output 0.00019 Conveyor Transfer Point (2 drop points) 0.0 00 0 46 x 2 Secondary Crushing 0.00027 Screening of Secondary Crusher Output (Controlled) 0.00037 Conveyor Transfer Point (2 drop points) 0.000046 x 2 Tertiary Crushing 0.00054 Screening of Tertiary Crusher Output 0.00074 Conveyor Transfer Point (2 drop points) 0.000046 x 2 Fines Crushing 0.0012 Fines Screening 0.0022 Conveyor Transfer Point (2 drop points) 0.000046 x 2 Dry Sand and Gravel Screening 0.0022 Dry Sand and Gravel Conveying (4 drop points) 0.000046 x 4 Truck Loading

– Conveyor, crushed stone 0.0001
Total PM 10 E missions F actor 0. 008518

E mission factors from AP 42 Table 11.19.2

- 2 , for controlled sources

PM 10 for SQCS operations :
PM 10 = Monthly throughput limitation x emissions factor x 12 months/year x lbs to ton conversion

PM 10 = 1, 1 00,000 (tons/ month ) x 0. 008518 (lb s /ton) x 12 months/year x 1/2

, 000 (ton s /lb)

= 56.2 tpy

NO X Emissions from Engines by Ozone Area :

Ozone Attainment Areas and Marginal or Moderate Ozone Nonattainment A reas: NO X = Monthly throughput limitation x 12 months/year x fuel heat content x emissions factor x lbs to ton

conversion

NO X = 24,200 (gallons/ month ) x 12 months/year x 1.37 MMBtu/gal x 4.41 (lb/MMBtu) x 1/2

, 000 (ton s /lb)

= 88.2 tpyPage 19 of 18

Serious Ozone Nonattainment Areas:

NO X = Monthly throughput limitation x 12 months/year x fuel heat content x emissions factor x lbs to ton

conversion

NO X = 12,000 (gallons/ month ) x 12 months/year x 1.37 MMBtu/gal lon x 4.41 (lb/MMBtu) x 1 /2

, 000 (ton s /lb)

= 43.7 tpy

Severe Ozone Nonattainment Areas:

NO X = Monthly throughput limitation x 12 months/year x fuel heat content x emissions factor x lbs to ton

conversion

NO X = 5,500 (gallons/ month ) x 12 months/year x 1.37 MMBtu/gal lon x 4.41 (lb/MMBtu) x 1/2

, 000 (ton s /lb)

= 20.1 tpy

Extreme Ozone Nonattainment Areas:

NO X = Monthly throughput limitation x 12 months/year x fuel heat content x emissions factor x lbs to ton

conversion

NO X = 1,900 (gallons/ month ) x 12 months/year x 1.37 MMBtu/gal lon x 4.41 (lb/MMBtu) x 1/2

, 000 (ton s /lb)

= 6.9 tpy