alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16467]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--AAF Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 28, 2000, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), AAF Association, Inc. has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties 
and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of 
the parties are Avid Technology, Tewksbury, MA; British Broadcasting 
Corporation, Tadworth, Surrey, UNITED KINGDOM; CNN/Turner Broadcasting 
Systems, Atlanta, GA; Discreet Logic, Montreal, CANADA; Matrox, Quebec, 
CANADA; Microsoft Corporation, Playa Del Rey, CA; Sony Corporation, San 
Jose, CA; Pinnacle, Mountain View, CA; Quantel, Newbury, Berkshire, 
UNITED KINGDOM; U.S. National Imaging & Mapping Agency, Reston, VA; and 
4MC, Burbank, CA. The nature and objectives of the venture are to 
promote the development and adoption of open, accessible standards and 
specifications relating to file interchange formats, including 
initially the Advanced Authoring Format (collectively, the 
``Specifications''); to promote such Specifications worldwide; to 
provide for testing and conformity assessment of implementations in 
order to ensure compliance with Specifications; to create and own 
distinctive trademarks; if advisable, to operate a branding program to 
create high customer awareness of, demand for, and confidence in 
products designed in compliance with Specifications; and to undertake 
such other activities as may from time to time be appropriate to 
further the purposes and achieve the goals set forth above.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-16467 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 301-10.307 What will I be reimbursed if I use a POV to transport other employees?

Using a POV to transport other employees is strictly voluntary and you may be reimbursed in accordance with § 301-10.305.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1521 Filing and service of documents.

Any application for an award or other pleading relating to an application shall be filed and served on all parties to the proceeding in the same manner as other pleadings in the proceeding, except as provided in § 1.1512(b) for confidential financial information.
#### ROBERT E. KING and wife, JO ANN O’NEAL v. MICHAEL S. BRYANT, M.D., and VILLAGE SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A.

From Cumberland County

No. 294PA14

ORDER

On 21 August 2015, this Court ordered this case certified to the trial court for additional findings of fact as to “[w]hether a physician-patient relationship existed at the time Mr. King signed the arbitration agreement.” On 6 November 2015, the trial court entered the additional findings of fact.

Now, the Court, on its own motion, orders that the parties submit supplemental briefs on the effect of the trial court’s additional findings of fact on the proceedings in this case. Appellants’ supplemental brief shall be filed no later than thirty days after the date of this order, and appel-lees’ supplemental brief shall be filed no later than thirty days following appellants’ filing.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 19th day of February, 2016.

s/Hudson. J.

For the Court

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 19th day of February, 2016.

CHRISTIE S. CAMERON ROEDER Clerk of the Supreme Court

s/M.C. Hacknev Assistant Clerk
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Atlas Minerals Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H.R. (Roy) Shipes,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


By:             /s/ H.R. (Roy) Shipes
                ------------------------
                H.R. (Roy) Shipes
                Chief Executive Officer
                August 13, 2003
46799.

#### GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. HURLEY et al.

(382 SE2d 597)

Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter (Ga. *Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hurley,*190 Ga. App. 546 (379 SE2d 420) (1989)), it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari, and the writ is therefore vacated.

*All the Justices concur, except Weltner, J., not participating.*

*339Decided June 22, 1989

Reconsideration denied July 13, 1989.

*Dillard & Landers, Terry A. Dillard, Bryant H. Bower, Jr.,*for appellant.

*William E. Moore, Jr., John W. Case, J. Converse Bright, Robert M. Clyatt,*for appellees.
<PAGE>

                 CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP - EXHIBIT 23.1
                 ---------------------------------------------

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report included in this Form 10-K into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31914, File No. 333-
33312, File No. 333-67589, File No. 333-10253 and File No. 333-3388),
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-37586 and File No. 333-46813)
and Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-53899).


                                         Arthur Andersen  LLP
                                         San Francisco, California
                                         July 13, 2000
No. 11-9634.

#### Stefanik *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
9 June 2016

421P10-4

#### Robert Allen Lillie v. Michael Ball, Superintendent, Avery-Mitchell Correctional Inst.

Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Denial of Petition for *Writ of Habeas Corpus*

Denied 05/18/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ANACOMP
INC.'S MARCH 31,1999 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>                                               
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         14,523
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  70,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                   6,850
<INVENTORY>                                    16,943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,769
<PP&E>                                         52,871
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 368,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,135
<BONDS>                                        339,619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       142
<OTHER-SE>                                     (80,757)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   368,139
<SALES>                                        77,584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,907
<CGS>                                          48,977
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             20,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (26,078)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,122
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (30,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 809
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (29,391)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (2.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.06)
        


</TABLE>
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–14

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 436, THE

GOVERNMENT WASTE, FRAUD AND ERROR REDUCTION

ACT OF 1999

FEBRUARY 9, 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 43]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 43, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 436, the

‘‘Government Waste, Fraud and Error Reduction Act of 1999’’

under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate

divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Government Reform.

The rule waives section 303 of the Congressional Budget Act

(prohibiting consideration of legislation providing new budget authority or contract authority for a fiscal year until the budget resolution for that fiscal year has been agreed to) against the consideration of the bill. The rule also provides that the bill will be considered as read.

Members who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given priority

in recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent

with House rules. The rule allows for the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole to postpone votes during consideration of the bill,

and to reduce votes to five minutes on a postponed question if the

vote follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one

motion to recommit, with or without instruction.
2

The waiver of section 303 of the Budget Act is necessary because

there is no FY 1999 budget resolution and Budget Committee

Chairman Kasich has not yet published in the Congressional

Record budget allocations pursuant to House Resolution 5.

Æ
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-22814-CV-WILLIAMS

LUIS BUSTELO FERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

GREAT HAVANA INC., et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s Report 

and Recommendation (DE 35) (“Report”) on (1) Defendant Grand Havana Master LLC’s 

Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (DE 13); (2) Defendant Grand Havana 

Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (DE 23); and (3) Defendants 

Tanya Bredemeier and Robert Rico’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint 

(DE 25) (collectively the “Motions to Dismiss”). In the Report, Judge Reid recommends 

that the Motions to Dismiss be denied. (DE 35 at 1.) Defendants Grand Havana Master, 

LLC, Grand Havana Inc., Tanya Bredemeier, and Robert Rico (collectively, 

“Defendants”) filed an objection1 to the Report (DE 36), to which Plaintiff filed a 

1 The Court notes that the objection merely rehashes arguments, in some instances 

verbatim, that were presented to Judge Reid. As such, the objection simply disagrees 

with the Report’s conclusion. However, it is well settled that an objecting party may not 

“submit [] papers to a district court which are nothing more than a rehashing of the same 

arguments and positions taken in the original papers submitted to the Magistrate Judge. 

Clearly, parties are not to be afforded a ‘second bite at the apple’ when they file objections 

to a [Report].” Marlite, Inc. v. Eckenrod, 2012 WL 3614212, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 21, 2012) 

(quoting Camardo v. Gen. Motors Hourly-Rate Emps. Pension Plan, 806 F. Supp. 380, 

382 (W.D.N.Y. 1992)).

Case 1:22-cv-22814-KMW Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Response (DE 39). The Court conducted a de novo review of the portions of the Report 

to which Defendants objected and a review of the remainder of the Report for clear error. 

Having carefully reviewed the Report, the Objection, the record, and applicable 

law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report (DE 35) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. Defendant Grand Havana Master LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 

Amended Complaint (DE 13) is DENIED. 

3. Defendant Grand Havana Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended 

Complaint (DE 23) is DENIED.

4. Defendants Tanya Bredemeier and Robert Rico’s Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (DE 25) is DENIED. 

5. Defendants shall file answers to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint within 

fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 5th day of

July, 2023.

Case 1:22-cv-22814-KMW Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2023 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DEC. 31,1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATAMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US$

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             588
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,165
<PP&E>                                           5,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,649
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,287
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,191
<SALES>                                         46,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,992
<CGS>                                           33,068
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (249)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,865
<INCOME-TAX>                                       682
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,183
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,183
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for period ended July 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,974
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (3,392)
<INVENTORY>                                    117,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,253
<PP&E>                                         210,313
<DEPRECIATION>                                 115,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 322,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,141
<BONDS>                                         89,052
<COMMON>                                         9,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   322,644
<SALES>                                        111,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               236,920
<CGS>                                           71,892
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   650
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,107
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,786
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,786
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44


</TABLE>
November 1, 2012 

US DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 

DOCKET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE. SE 

WEST BLDG., GROUND FLOOR, ROOM W12-140 

WASHINGTON, DC 20590 

Re: AMT INTERIOR DESIGN, INC./ EXEMPTION WITHDRAWAL 

Docket No. FAA-2012-1129 

Sirs: 

Please withdraw our initial Petition for Exemption filed under Docket No. FAA-2012-1129. 

Thank you. 

~~~~~~~~A~CC~O~UNTABL~~R~ ELIZ BETH SANCHEZ, DRUG PROGRAM MANAGER 

AMT Interior Design Inc. 

1050 Arion Pkwy, Ste 114 

San Antonio, Tx -78216 · 

210-495-2900 

CC: JON HOPKINS, INSPECTOR 

FAA DRUG ABATEMEN DIV. 

2601 MEACHAM BLVD. Rm 121 

FT .. WORTH, TX 76137 

CC: FAA DRUG ABATEMENT DIVISION {AAM-800) 

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE. SW ROOM 806 

WASHIN.GTON, DC 20591 

. '',,. 

,.__, { 

.._, 

= :-:)-

(J :r;; f.:.; ~- 7':>' CJ r-n :z: =:;;z <: --!(/)-

I -o:O Oo--1 cr -u:I:J!5: rrr--in, 

)> ;;:D:;r;:.Z 

P--r--1 

~-o 

-P. -o 0----n zrU1 co 

......J
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

____________

No. 23-30590

Summary Calendar

____________

Fred Howard, Jr., 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

City of Shreveport; D. J. Gaut, individually and as an employee of 

the City of Shreveport; James N. Roberts, individually and as an 

employee of the City of Shreveport; Joey Hester, individually and as an 

employee of the City of Shreveport; William Scott, individually and as an 

employee of the City of Shreveport; T. W. Oster, 

Defendants—Appellees.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:01-CV-2303

______________________________

Before Elrod, Haynes, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:

*

Fred Howard, Jr., Louisiana prisoner # 117952, moves to proceed in 

forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal following the district court’s denial of his 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 13, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-30590 Document: 00516965199 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/13/2023
No. 23-30590

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. His motion was filed following 

the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. Howard’s IFP motion challenges the district court’s 

determination that the appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 

117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). This court’s inquiry into whether the 

appeal is taken in good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves ‘legal 

points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).’” Howard v. 

King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (citation omitted). 

Howard contends that his judgment is void and that he is entitled to 

relief under Rule 60(b)(4), because his § 1983 proceeding was reassigned 

from one district court judge to another and the judge to whom the case was 

assigned lacked jurisdiction to sign and enter the judgment of dismissal. 

Howard does not make the requisite showing that he has a nonfrivolous issue 

for appeal. See Howard, 707 F.2d at 220. Accordingly, his motion to proceed 

IFP is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 

117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 

1996), abrogated in part on other grounds by Coleman v. Tollefson, 575 U.S. 532, 

537 (2015). Howard is WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes, he 

will not be permitted to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while 

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of 

serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

Case: 23-30590 Document: 00516965199 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/13/2023