alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period June 30, 2006
(the "Report"), Joey Schwartz Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1). To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                  DATE: AUGUST 11, 2006


                                                  /S/ JOEY SCHWARTZ
                                                  --------------------
                                                  JOEY SCHWARTZ
                                                  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-11070.

#### Buissereth *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON :

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,

http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center,

U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, gpo@custhelp.com.

61–914 PDF 2010

S. Hrg. 111–691 

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE 

ON THE ARTICLES AGAINST 

JUDGE G. THOMAS PORTEOUS, JR. 

HEARINGS

BEFORE THE

SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL 

COMMITTEE 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

ON

THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST JUDGE G. THOMAS 

PORTEOUS, JR., A JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 

November 16, 2010 

Volume 3 of 3, Part C 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate 
ii

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE ON THE ARTICLES 

AGAINST JUDGE G. THOMAS PORTEOUS, JR. 

CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri, Chairman

ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Vice Chairman 

AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota 

SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island 

TOM UDALL, New Mexico 

JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire 

EDWARD E. KAUFMAN, Delaware 

JIM DEMINT, South Carolina 

JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming 

ROGER WICKER, Mississippi 

MIKE JOHANNS, Nebraska 

JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho 

COMMITTEE STAFF 

DERRON R. PARKS, Staff Director and Chief Counsel 

THOMAS L. JIPPING, Deputy Staff Director and Deputy Chief Counsel 

JUSTIN KIM, Counsel

REBECCA S. SEIDEL, Counsel

ERIN P. JOHNSON, Deputy Counsel and Chief Clerk 

LAKE DISHMAN, Professional Staff Member 

CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE STAFF 

SUSAN NAVARRO SMELCER, Analyst on the Federal Judiciary 

SENATE LEGAL COUNSEL STAFF 

MORGAN J. FRANKEL, Senate Legal Counsel 

PATRICIA MACK BRYAN, Deputy Senate Legal Counsel 

GRANT R. VINIK, Assistant Senate Legal Counsel 

THOMAS E. CABALLERO, Assistant Senate Legal Counsel 
iii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Committee gratefully acknowledges the high standard of professionalism and 

long hours of dedicated service of its staff. The Committee also expresses its appreciation to Lynden C. Armstrong, Chief Clerk of the Committee on Rules and Administration, and to the following staff of Committee members: 

STAFF OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS 

Senator MCCASKILL, Chairman, Derron R. Parks 

Senator HATCH, Vice Chairman, Thomas L. Jipping 

Senator KLOBUCHAR, Paige Herwig 

Senator WHITEHOUSE, Stephen C. N. Lilley and Justin G. Florence 

Senator UDALL, Matthew T. Nelson 

Senator SHAHEEN, Thomas J. Maloney 

Senator KAUFMAN, Nhan Nguyen 

Senator DEMINT, Erica Suares 

Senator BARRASSO, Bryn Stewart 

Senator WICKER, Emily Ferris 

Senator JOHANNS, Sarah Novascone 

Senator RISCH, Jason Bohrer 

INTERNS

Christian Dibblee 

Timothy Holman 

Hannah Lockhart 

Annie Moulton 

Michael Naclerio 

Patrick Sadler
No. 11-8377.

#### Becoats *v.*New York.

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.
H. R. 4322

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To amend the Small Business Act to increase the authorization for the development

company program, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LOANS.

Section 20(i)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note)

is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘$8,458,000,000’’ and inserting

‘‘$8,758,000,000’’; and

(2) by striking ‘‘$1,200,000,000’’ and inserting

‘‘$1,500,000,000’’.

SEC. 2. DISASTER LOAN PERSONNEL.

Section 5(b)(8) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 634(b)(8))

is amended by striking the semicolon and inserting the following:

‘‘: Provided, That the Administrator may extend the six-month

limitation for an additional six months if the Administrator determines the extension is necessary to continue efficient disaster loan

making activities;’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4244

To amend title 46, United States Code, to provide equitable treatment for

certain individuals employed on vessels with respect to State and local

income taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 18, 1994

Mrs. UNSOELD (for herself and Mr. STUDDS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred jointly to the Committees on Merchant Marine and

Fisheries and the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 46, United States Code, to provide equitable

treatment for certain individuals employed on vessels

with respect to State and local income taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transportation Em5 ployee Equitable Treatment Act of 1994’’.
2

•HR 4244 IH

1 SEC. 2. EQUITABLE TREATMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS EM2 PLOYED ON VESSELS WITH RESPECT TO

3 STATE AND LOCAL INCOME TAXES.

4 Section 11108 of title 46, United States Code, is

5 amended—

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before the first sentence;

7 and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(b) An individual who performs regularly assigned

10 duties in more than one State while employed on a vessel

11 as a master or seaman or as a pilot licensed under section

12 7101 of this title or licensed or authorized under the laws

13 of a State, shall not be subject to the income tax laws

14 of a State or political subdivision of a State with respect

15 to that employment, other than the State and political

16 subdivision in which the individual resides.’’.

Æ
#### § 109-38.301-1.52 Maintenance of records.

Designated contractors shall maintain logs or other records on the use of a Government motor vehicle for transportation between an employee's residence and place of employment. As a minimum, these logs shall indicate the employee's name, date of use, time of departure and arrival, miles driven, and names of other passengers. Cognizant finance offices shall be provided with applicable data on employees who utilize Government motor vehicles for such transportation for purposes of the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 concerning the taxation of fringe benefits.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7686

JAMES E. HARRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-98-268-5-H)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 16, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James E. Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. North Carolina, No.

CA-98-268-5-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
H. R. 808

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To extend for 6 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of title 11,

United States Code, is reenacted.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law 105–277

is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘April 1, 1999’’ each place it appears and

inserting ‘‘October 1, 1999’’;

(2) in subsection (a)—

(A) by striking ‘‘September 30, 1998’’ and inserting

‘‘March 31, 1999’’; and

(B) by striking ‘‘October 1, 1998’’ and inserting ‘‘April

1, 1999’’; and

(3) by striking subsection (c).

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on April

1, 1999.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.243 Authority of presiding officer. From the time the presiding officer is designated until issuance of the presiding officer's decision or the transfer of the proceeding to the Commission or to another presiding officer, the presiding officer shall have such authority as granted by law and by the provisions of this chapter, including authority to: ( a ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( b ) Issue subpenas;
( c ) Examine witnesses;
( d ) Rule upon questions of evidence;
( e ) Take or cause depositions to be taken;
( f ) Regulate the course of the hearing, maintain decorum, and exclude from the hearing any person engaging in contemptuous conduct or otherwise disrupting the proceedings;
( g ) Require the filing of memoranda of law and the presentation of oral argument with respect to any question of law upon which the presiding officer or the Commission is required to rule during the course of the hearing proceeding;
( h ) Hold conferences for the settlement or simplification of the issues by consent of the parties;
( i ) Dispose of procedural requests and ancillary matters, as appropriate;
( j ) Take actions and make decisions in conformity with governing law;
( k ) Act on motions to enlarge, modify or delete the hearing issues;
( l ) Act on motions to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to § 1.224;
( m ) Decide a matter upon the existing record or request additional information from the parties; and
( n ) Issue such orders and conduct such proceedings as will best conduce to the proper dispatch of business and the ends of justice.
(5 U.S.C. 556; 47 U.S.C. 154, 159, 208, 209, 214, 309, 312, 316, and 409)
[28 FR 12425, Nov. 22, 1963, as amended at 41 FR 53022, Dec. 3, 1976; 85 FR 63176, Oct. 6, 2020]
Wesley	W.	Myers,	Jr.			Section	333	Exemption	Petition			(954)261-5568			WesMyers007@gmail.com

Page	1

Wesley W. Myers, Jr., Dania Beach, Fl. - Section 333 Amendment to Exemption # 11592

May 18, 2015

Docket Operations, M-30

U. S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor

Washington, DC 20590-0001

Re: Request for an amendment to FAA Exemption # 11592

Dear Sir or Madam:

I am requesting an amendment to my granted exemption # 11592 in order to add two additional models 

of UAVs and to relieve certain PIC currency requirements.

1. I am requesting to add The Phantom 3 Professional, Phantom 3 Advanced and The Inspire 1 UAVs 

all of which are manufactured by DJI. 

The Phantom 3 is the most recent version in the Phantom line which has already been approved in my 

exemption. The physical and flight characteristics are virtually the same as the Phantom 2 UAVs which 

are already approved in my exemption.

The DJI Inspire 1 meets all of the criteria of my exemption and has been previously approved in 

numerous granted exemptions including Exemption # 11537, New Story Media, LLC and Exemption 

#11590, Simon Feldman Studio, Inc.

2. I am requesting relief from the FLIGHT PORTION ONLY of #13 in the Conditions and Limitations 

section of my exemption requiring, in my case, a Biennial Flight Review in a fixed wing manned 

aircraft pursuant to 14CFR - 61.56. 

With the expense of renting aircraft and hiring flight instructors the flight portion of this requirement is 

an unnecessary burden on the PIC and has no material bearing regarding piloting small Unmanned 

Aerial Vehicles. It is understood that The FAA's main objective of this requirement is to insure that all 

PICs remain up to date on current regulations, policies, procedures and changes thereto. This objective 

will be met by complying with the ground portion of the BFR requirement which will remain as a 

requirement.

Should you have any questions aor require any additional information please contact the undersigned.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Respectfully,

Wesley W Myers, Jr.
Wesley	W.	Myers,	Jr.			Section	333	Exemption	Petition			(954)261-5568			WesMyers007@gmail.com

Page	2
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

** **

**MOSSIMO, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

 

I, Mossimo Giannulli, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer ofthe registrant, certify that:

 

1.                  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A ofMossimo, Inc.;

 

2.                  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

3.                  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

(a)            Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to usby others, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)            Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)            All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
| /s/ MOSSIMO GIANNULLI                     |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Mossimo Giannulli                         |
| *Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer* |
| April 28, 2006                            |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information from the Form 10-Q for the
quarterly  period  ended  June 30,  1996 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                       0000006814  
<NAME>                            COMFORCE Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     dollars
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           2,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,655
<PP&E>                                             420
<DEPRECIATION>                                      68 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,270
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0    
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,176 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,208 
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,158
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    720 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       268
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                452 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       452 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      21.1








List
      of Subsidiaries





Tanger
      Development Corporation





Tanger-Warren
      Development, LLC





TWMB
      Associates, LLC





Tanger
      Deer Park, LLC





Deer
      Park
      Enterprises, LLC





Tanger
      COROC, LLC





Tanger
      COROC II, LLC





COROC
      Holdings, LLC





COROC/Riviera
      L.L.C.





COROC/Hilton
      Head I L.L.C.





COROC/Hilton
      Head II L.L.C.





COROC/Lincoln
      City L.L.C.





COROC/Myrtle
      Beach L.L.C.





COROC/Park
      City L.L.C.





COROC/Rehoboth
      I L.L.C.





COROC/Rehoboth
      II L.L.C.





COROC/Rehoboth
      III L.L.C.





COROC/Lakes
      Region L.L.C.





COROC/Tilton
      L.L.C.





COROC/Tuscola
      L.L.C.





COROC/Westbrook
      I L.L.C.





COROC/Westbrook
      II L.L.C.





Tanger
      Devco, LLC





Tanger
      Wisconsin Dells, LLC
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 132 (Monday, July 10, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 42312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16627]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[RI-042-01-6990b; A-1-FRL-6727-8]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont; Aerospace Negative 
Declarations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve negative declarations 
submitted by the States of New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont for 
aerospace coating operations. In the Final Rules section of this 
Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's submittal as a direct 
final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no 
further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the 
direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received 
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed 
rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 9, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to David Conroy, Unit Manager, Air 
Quality Planning, Office of Ecosystem Protection (mail code CAQ), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England, One Congress Street, 
Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02114-2023. Copies of the States submittals are 
available for public inspection during normal business hours, by 
appointment at the Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, EPA New England, One Congress Street, 11th floor, 
Boston, MA 02114-2023. Copies of New Hampshire's submittal are also 
available at Air Resources Division, Department of Environmental 
Services, 6 Hazen Drive, P.O. Box 95, Concord, NH 03302-0095. Copies of 
Rhode Island's submittal are also available at Office of Air Resources, 
Department of Environmental Management, 235 Promenade Street, 
Providence, RI 02908-5767. Copies of Vermont's submittal are also 
available Air Pollution Control Division, Agency of Natural Resources, 
Building 3 South, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, VT 05676.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne E. Arnold, (617) 918-1047.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the direct 
final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: June 12, 2000.
Mindy S. Lubber,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 00-16627 Filed 7-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P