alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 176A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0944
  doi:10.3000/19770944.CA2013.176.ita |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell'Unione europea | C 176A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 56o anno21 giugno 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0944

doi:10.3000/19770944.CA2013.176.ita

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell'Unione europea

C 176A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

56o anno21 giugno 2013

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rettifiche |
| 2013/C 176A/01 | Rettifica al bando di concorso generale EPSO/AD/249/13 (GU C 75 A del 14.3.2013) | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

Rettifiche

2013/C 176A/01

Rettifica al bando di concorso generale EPSO/AD/249/13 (GU C 75 A del 14.3.2013)

(GU C 75 A del 14.3.2013)

1

CRONISTORIA DELLE GU C A CONCORSI

Si riporta qui di seguito l'elenco delle GU C A pubblicate nell'anno in corso.

Salvo indicazione contraria, le GU sono pubblicate in tutte le versioni linguistiche.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | |
| 176 | (BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

166

167

168

172

173

174

176

(BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

Rettifiche

| 21.6.2013 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea | CA 176/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2013

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea

CA 176/1

---

Rettifica al bando di concorso generale EPSO/AD/249/13

(

  Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea C 75 A del 14 marzo 2013
  )

(2013/C 176 A/01)

A pagina 6, al titolo VI, punto 2, lettera d):

anziché:

| «d) | un colloquio strutturato relativo alle competenze nel settore prescelto sulla base delle risposte fornite nella sezione “valutazione dei talenti” dell'atto di candidatura;» |
| --- | --- |

«d)

un colloquio strutturato relativo alle competenze nel settore prescelto sulla base delle risposte fornite nella sezione “valutazione dei talenti” dell'atto di candidatura;»

leggi:

| «d) | un colloquio strutturato relativo alle competenze nel settore prescelto e sulla base delle risposte fornite nella sezione “valutazione dei talenti” dell'atto di candidatura;» |
| --- | --- |

«d)

un colloquio strutturato relativo alle competenze nel settore prescelto e sulla base delle risposte fornite nella sezione “valutazione dei talenti” dell'atto di candidatura;»

---
Exhibit
32.2     Section 1350 Certification




CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of North Central Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kyle C.
Cook, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
      and




2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
  Report.




March
      27, 2009
                /s/ Kyle C.
  CookKyle
      C. CookChief
      Financial Officer and
Treasurer
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.415 Comments and replies. ( a ) After notice of proposed rulemaking is issued, the Commission will afford interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking proceeding through submission of written data, views, or arguments, with or without opportunity to present the same orally in any manner.
( b ) A reasonable time will be provided for submission of comments in support of or in opposition to proposed rules, and the time provided will be specified in the notice of proposed rulemaking.
( c ) A reasonable time will be provided for filing comments in reply to the original comments, and the time provided will be specified in the notice of proposed rulemaking.
( d ) No additional comments may be filed unless specifically requested or authorized by the Commission. Note:
In some (but not all) rulemaking proceedings, interested persons may also communicate with the Commission and its staff on an *ex parte* basis, provided certain procedures are followed. See §§ 1.420 and 1.1200 *et seq.* See also __ FCC 2d __ (1980) (*i.e.*, this order).
( e ) For time limits for filing motions for extension of time for filing responses to petitions for rulemaking, replies to such responses, comments filed in response to notices of proposed rulemaking, replies to such comments, see § 1.46(b).
[28 FR 12432, Nov. 22, 1963, as amended at 42 FR 28888, June 6, 1977; 45 FR 45591, July 7, 1980; 52 FR 37460, Oct. 7, 1987]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: June 26, 2000, 65 FR 39384.
 PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: June 28, 2000, 10:00 a.m.
 CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The following Docket Nos. and Company has been added to Item CAE-1 and on the Agenda scheduled for the June 28, 2000 meeting.
 Item No.
Docket No. and companyCAE-1
ER00-2068-000, ER00-1379-000, ER00-1386-000 and ER00-1387-000, Ameren Services Company.
 David P. Boergers, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 00-16877 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary publishes a list of information collections it has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) and 5 CFR 1320.5. The following are those information collections recently submitted to OMB.

1. Evaluation of the BodyWise Eating Disorder Initiative—NEW—The Office on Women's Health plans to conduct an evaluation of the initial demonstration phase of the BodyWise Eating Disorder initiative to look for changes in school practices and awareness regarding eating disorder issues. The study design features a pre-test/post-test model with questionnaires to be completed by a sample of middle school staff. Burden Information for Pre-test—Number of Respondents: 426; Burden Per Response: 20 minutes; Burden for Pre-test: 142 hours—Burden Information for Post-test—Number of Respondents: 396; Burden Per Response: 20 minutes; Burden for Post-test: 132 hours—Total Burden: 274 hours.

OMB Desk Officer: Allison Eydt.

                    Copies of the information collection packages listed above can be obtained by calling the OS Reports Clearance Officer on (202) 690-6207. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the OMB desk officer designated above at the following address: Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management and                           ( print page 41073)                        Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.                

Comments may also be sent to Cynthia Agens Bauer, OS Reports Clearance Officer, Room 503H, Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201. Written comments should be received on or before August 2, 2000.

Dated: June 15, 2000.

Dennis P. Williams,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Budget.

[FR Doc. 00-16669  Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
#### EX PARTE Anthony Ray MCCULLOUGH

CR-14-0123

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

02/24/2015

Mand. pet. dismissed
§ 60-1.23 Contents of complaint. ( a ) The complaint shall include the name, address, and telephone number of the complainant, the name and address of the contractor or subcontractor committing the alleged discrimination, a description of the acts considered to be discriminatory, and any other pertinent information which will assist in the investigation and resolution of the complaint. The complaint shall be signed by the complainant or his/her authorized representative. Complaints alleging class-type violations which do not identify the alleged discriminatee or discriminatees will be accepted, provided the other requirements of this paragraph are met.
( b ) If a complaint contains incomplete information, OFCCP shall seek the needed information from the complainant. In the event such information is not furnished to the Director within 60 days of the date of such request, the case may be closed.
[43 FR 49240, Oct. 20, 1978, as amended at 62 FR 66971, Dec. 22, 1997]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41429-41430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16886]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration


Notice of Meeting With Interested Public To Discuss Sanctions 
Easing for North Korea

    The Bureau of Export Administration (BXA), in conjunction with 
other federal agencies, will brief companies and interested 
organizations on recent changes in North Korea that have led to easing 
of trade sanctions. U.S. officials will provide information on the new 
rules for doing business with North Korea.

[[Page 41430]]

    The meeting will be held July 6, 2000, at 9:30 a.m., at the 
Department of Commerce, Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 6802, 14th 
Street between Pennsylvania Avenue and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC.
    If you plan to attend, please fax your name and company or 
organization affiliation to ATTN: NORTH KOREA BRIEFING, at (202) 482-
6088. For further information contact Frank Ruggiero in BXA at (202) 
482-1926 or 482-4252. Interested parties requiring special 
accommodations should also contact BXA in advance.

Background

    On June 19, 2000, BXA published regulations easing sanctions on 
North Korea. This implemented the Administration's September 1999 
decision to ease sanctions provided North Korea maintains its 
moratorium on testing long-range ballistic missiles. U.S. exporters may 
now export the vast majority of U.S. consumer products to North Korea 
without a license, including agricultural, medical, and low-level 
industrial goods and services. The Administration's sanctions easing 
program continues to require a license for items on the Commerce 
Control List (CCL), including additional items added to the CCL on June 
19. Items on the CCL include multilaterally controlled items, as well 
as a range of lower-level products and technologies controlled for 
anti-terrorism and non-proliferation reasons.
    Other Federal agencies took related measures. The Transportation 
Department published a rule lifting the ban on U.S. ships and aircraft 
transporting goods or traveling to North Korea. Previously, U.S. 
registered ships and aircraft were prohibited from engaging in such 
activities. The Treasury Department published rules allowing new 
financial, trade and other transactions with North Korea and its 
nationals. Treasury will require a notification and approval process 
for all imports from North Korea.
    BXA has scheduled a meeting for July 6 to more fully explain to 
industry and other organizations the new rules for conducting business 
with North Korea.

James A. Lewis,
Director, Office of Strategic Trade.
[FR Doc. 00-16886 Filed 7-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P
**Exhibit31.2**

 

Certifications

 

I, John C. Dong, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/Aof Watchit Media, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of Watchit Media, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures presentedin the annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in thisannual report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) any fraud, whether ofnot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

Date: April 28, 2006

  
|   | /s/ John C. Dong                                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | John C.  Dong                                           |
|   | Executive Vice  President and Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period September 30,
2004 (the "Report"), Nitin M. Amersey, Interim Chairman of the Company, David J.
Johnson, Interim Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and Arthur
V. Conover, III, Controller of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1).  To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.


/s/ Nitin M. Amersey
--------------------
Nitin M. Amersey
Interim Chairman of the Board
November 12, 2004


/s/ David J. Johnson
--------------------
David J. Johnson
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2004


/s/ Arthur V. Conover, III
--------------------------
Arthur V. Conover, III
Controller
November 12, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Comments on: 20-1961: COREPHOTONICS, LTD. v. APPLE INC. [OPINION], Nonprecedential
[Civ. No. 2301.

First Appellate District.

March 12, 1918.]

#### JAMES D. HALSTED et al., Appellants, v. OAKLAND BANK OF SAVINGS et al., Respondents. JAMES D. HALSTED et al., Appellants, v. CENTRAL SAVINGS BANK et al., Respondents.

[Civ. No. 2303.

First Appellate District.

March 12, 1918.]

Trust—Bank Deposits.—Judgment in each case affirmed on the authority of *Halsted et al.*v. *Central Savings JBanlc, ante,*p. 600.

APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Alameda County. W. H. Thomas, Judge Presiding.

The facts are stated in the opinion in *Halsted et al.*v. *Central Savings Bank, ante,*p. 500.

O’Neill & O’Neill, and Chapman & Trefethen, for Appellants.

Harry E. Leach, and Abe P. Leach, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

The facts of these two cases are such as to present the same question that we have this day decided in *James D. Halsted et al.*v. *Central Savings Bank, ante,*p. 500, [172 Pac. 613], numbered in this court No. 2302. In all the eases the plaintiffs, as executors of the last will of James M. Halsted, deceased, are seeking to establish an interest in certain savings bank deposits belonging to the deceased in his lifetime, but in which he had created an interest in favor of Anna N. Collins amounting upon his death to absolute and sole ownership.

Upon the authority of the above-mentioned case of *Halsted et al.*v. *Central Savings Bank,*No. 2302, the judgment in each of these cases is affirmed.

A petition to have the causes heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 9, 1918.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,182-01

EX PARTE FIDEL RAMIREZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2014-DCR-00042-D IN THE 103rd DISTRICT COURT

FROM CAMERON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of assault on a

family member and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because

he erroneously advised Applicant that he was pleading guilty in exchange for a probated sentence. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
2

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: March 9, 2016

Do not publish