alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VANSTAR
CORPORATION'S FORM 10-K FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED FOR THE YEARS ENDED APRIL 30,
1996 AND APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996<F1>    APR-30-1997<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1996        APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,505              5,686
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  327,217            191,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,812              8,252
<INVENTORY>                                    352,601            389,592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               709,449            601,756
<PP&E>                                          73,795            102,991
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,287             63,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 830,008            761,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          393,654            393,327
<BONDS>                                        302,277              5,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0            194,518
<PREFERRED>                                          0                  0
<COMMON>                                            42                 43
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,001            166,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   830,008            761,423
<SALES>                                      1,632,375          1,864,909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,884,635          2,214,786
<CGS>                                        1,479,073          1,679,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,624,014          1,891,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,488             14,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,825             52,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                       433             19,042
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,514             33,951
<DISCONTINUED>                                   9,194                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                  0
<CHANGES>                                            0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,708             28,807
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50               0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47               0.66
<FN>
<F1> ALL AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT THE MENTOR TECHNOLOGIES AND CDS
POOLING-OF-INTEREST TRANSACTIONS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area (SRA) Advisory Council

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The second Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory Council 
meeting will convene in Stayton, Oregon on Monday, July 17, 2000. The 
meeting is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m., and will conclude at 
approximately 8:30 p.m. The meeting will be held in the South Room of 
the Stayton Community Center, 400 West Virginia Street, Stayton, 
Oregon.
    The Opal Creek Wilderness and Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Act 
of 1996 (Opal Creek Act) (Pub. L. 104-208) directed the Secretary of 
Agriculture to establish the Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory 
Council. The Advisory Council is comprised of thirteen members 
representing state, county and city governments, and representatives of 
various organizations, which include mining industry, environmental 
organizations, inholders in Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area, economic 
development, Indian tribes, adjacent landowners and recreation 
interests. The council provides advice to the Secretary of Agriculture 
on preparation of a comprehensive Opal Creek Management Plan for the 
SRA, and consults on a periodic and regular basis on the management of 
the area. The tentative agenda includes:
    (1) Overview of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA); (2) 
overview of the planning process including the National Environmental 
Policy Act, National Forest Management Act, and amending the Forest 
Plan; and (3) a presentation on the Cultural and Historic Resource 
Inventory.
    The public comment period is tentatively scheduled to begin at 8 
p.m. Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged, particularly if the material 
cannot be presented within the time limits of the comment period. 
Written comments may be submitted prior to the July 17 meeting by 
sending them to Designated Federal Official Stephanie Phillips at the 
address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Stephanie Phillips; 
Williamette National Forest, Detroit Ranger District, HC 73 Box 320, 
Mill City, OR 97360; (503) 854-3366.

    Dated: June 26, 2000.
Y. Robert Iwamoto,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 00-16547 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1)    | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                  and      |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |

| Dated:                  June 9, 2005 |                                      |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                      |
|                                 | /s/Stephen                M. O’Hara |  |  |  |
|                                 | Stephen                  M. O’Hara  |
|                                 | Chief                  Executive Officer  |
|                                 |                                      |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 18, 2019

t0911 

# Order

Clerk September 18, 2019

Rehearing No. 625

156827

- 8

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 156827

COA: 331232

Jackson CC: 15

- 004687

- FH

TERENCE MITCHELL BRUCE,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- A ppellant,

v SC: 156828

COA: 331233

Jackson CC: 15

- 004688

- FH

STANLEY LYLE NICHOLSON,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rehearing is considered, and it is DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Daou Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel J. Malcolm,
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ DANIEL J. MALCOLM
------------------------------
Daniel J. Malcolm
Chief Executive Officer
99–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–684 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE 

COMMITTEE ON RULES, AND PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES 

DECEMBER 17 (legislative day of December 16), 2010.—Referred to the House 

Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1771] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1771, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The resolution applies the waiver to any resolution reported through the legislative day of December 24, 2010. The 

resolution authorizes the Speaker to entertain motions that the 

House suspend the rules at any time through the legislative day 

of December 24, 2010. The Speaker or her designee shall consult 

with the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any 

matter for consideration pursuant to section 2 of the resolution. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with REPORTS
No. 11-9044.

#### Ausbeck *v.*Salt Lake *City,*Utah.

Ct. App. Utah. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Kenneth P. Hamik, President and CFO, of LipidViro Tech, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Registrant;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Quarterly Report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
for the Registrant and I have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the Registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
          those entities, particularly during the period in which this
          Quarterly Report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
          controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
          filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this Quarterly Report my conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
          My evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
          internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
          and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
          internal controls.

Dated: November 14, 2005             Signature:/s/Kenneth P. Hamik
                                     Kenneth P. Hamik
                                     President and CEO
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1942 Other sanctions.

The remedies and sanctions available to the Commission in this subpart are not exclusive. The Commission may impose other sanctions, where permitted by law, for any inexcusable, prolonged, or repeated failure of a debtor to pay such a claim. In such cases, the Commission will provide notice, as required by law, to the debtor prior to imposition of any such sanction.
No. 11-31.

#### Talbert *v.*Judiciary of the State of New Jersey et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 302-3.222 Will I be reimbursed if I travel to another overseas location (instead of the U.S.)?

If you travel to another overseas location (instead of the U.S.), you will be reimbursed only if your actual residence is within that country in which you are taking your leave, and then you will only be reimbursed your authorized travel and transportation expenses. You will have to pay any expense(s) above your authorized amount.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.291 General provisions. ( a ) ( 1 ) The Commission acts on petitions to amend, modify, enlarge or delete the issues in hearing proceedings which involve rule making matters exclusively.
( 2 ) All other interlocutory matters in hearing proceedings are acted on by the presiding officer.
( 3 ) Each interlocutory pleading shall identify the presiding officer in its caption. Unless the pleading is to be acted upon by the Commission, the presiding officer shall be identified by name.
( b ) All interlocutory pleadings shall be submitted in accordance with the provisions of §§ 1.4, 1.44, 1.47, 1.48, 1.49, 1.50, 1.51, and 1.52.
( c ) ( 1 ) Procedural rules governing interlocutory pleadings are set forth in §§ 1.294 through 1.298.
( 2 ) Rules governing appeal from, and reconsideration of, interlocutory rulings made by the presiding officer are set forth in § 1.301.
( 3 ) Petitions requesting reconsideration of an interlocutory ruling will not be entertained.
( d ) No initial decision shall become effective under § 1.276(e) until all interlocutory matters pending before the Commission in the proceeding at the time the initial decision is issued have been disposed of and the time allowed for appeal from interlocutory rulings of the presiding officer has expired.
(Secs. 4(i), 303(r) and 5(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended; 47 CFR 0.61 and 0.283)
[85 FR 63179, Oct. 6, 2020]
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit _____________________________ 

January 18, 2022

ERRATA

______________________ 

Appeal No. 20-2277

BROOKLYN BREWERY CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

BROOKLYN BREW SHOP, LLC,

Appellee

Decided: October 27, 2021

Precedential Opinion

______________________ 

Please make the following change:

Page 9, lines 1–5, change “Thus, the test for likelihood-of-confusion or descriptiveness purposes is whether 

the challenger and registrant compete in the same line of 

business and failure to cancel an existing mark, or to refuse 

registration of a new mark, would be likely to cause the 

opposer competitive injury.” to “Thus, the issue for likelihood-of-confusion or descriptiveness purposes is typically 

whether the challenger and registrant compete in the same 

line of business and failure to cancel an existing mark, or 

Case: 20-2277 Document: 52 Page: 1 Filed: 01/18/2022
BROOKLYN BREWERY CORPORATION v.

BROOKLYN BREW SHOP, LLC

2

to refuse registration of a new mark, would be likely to 

cause the opposer competitive injury.”

Case: 20-2277 Document: 52 Page: 2 Filed: 01/18/2022
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60048 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus DAVID EARL HUGHES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. CA:94cv116BN (E91-cr00005B)

- - - - - - - - - - June 29, 1995 Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * David Earl Hughes has failed to present an appellate argument concerning the district court's determination that his allegations of Fourth Amendment violations are procedurally barred from 28 U.S.C. § 2255 review. Those claims are effectively abandoned. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a); see United States v. Shaid , 937 F.2d 228, 231-32 (5th Cir. 1991) (en banc), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 1076 (1992). Furthermore, the claims wereNo. 95-60048 -2- waived by the entry of Hughes' guilty plea. United States v. Bell , 966 F.2d 914, 915 (5th Cir. 1992); Smith v. Estelle , 711 F.2d 677, 682 (5th Cir. 1983), cert. denied , 466 U.S. 906 (1984). The district court did not err in determining that Hughes' ineffective assistance of counsel claims were without merit. AFFIRMED.
§ 105-70.008 Service of complaint. ( a ) Service of a complaint must be made by certified or registered mail or by delivery in any manner authorized by Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Service is complete upon receipt.
( b ) Proof of service, stating the name and address of the person on whom the complaint was served, and the manner and date of service, may be made by— ( 1 ) Affidavit of the individual serving the complaint by delivery;
( 2 ) A United States Postal Service return receipt card acknowledging receipt; or
( 3 ) Written acknowledgment of receipt by the defendant or his representative.
#### § 60-30.27 Recommended decision.

Within a reasonable time after the filing of briefs, the Administrative Law Judge shall recommend findings, conclusions, and a decision. These recommendations shall be certified, together with the record for recommended decision, to the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, for a final Administrative order. The recommended findings, conclusions, and decision shall be served on all parties and amici to the proceeding.

[61 FR 19988, May 3, 1996]
Comments in Response to 

"Final rule; request for comments" 

Docket: FAA-2014-0832 Directorate Identifier 2014-SW-044-AD 

Comments have been received in response to: "Final rule; request for comments," 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted. 

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal. 

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: 

Anonymous 

(Please check one) 

L8J These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD. 

D These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

FAA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.) 

'RAt>. EvuPU~AN"f1 Name: 

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.) 

Rev 0 (9/08)
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.400 Definitions.

As used in this subpart, the term *party* refers to any person who participates in a proceeding by the timely filing of a petition for rule making, comments on a notice of proposed rule making, a petition for reconsideration, or responsive pleadings in the manner prescribed by this subpart. The term does not include those who submit letters, telegrams or other informal materials.

[41 FR 1287, Jan. 7, 1976]
# Comments on: 2020-1637: Rudisill v. Wilkie
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.50000 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to implement the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019, Public Law 116-124, 133 Stat. 158.
#### § 60-741.83 Rulings and interpretations.

Rulings under or interpretations of the act and this part shall be made by the Director.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 12, 2003 (the Report), I, Robert Essner, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 12, 2003

                            By  /s/           Robert Essner
                                --------------------------------------------
                                              Robert Essner
                             Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 302-4.203 How much per diem will my spouse or domestic partner receive if they accompany me while I am performing PCS travel?

The maximum amount your spouse or domestic partner may receive if they accompany you while you are performing PCS travel is three-fourths of your daily per diem rate.

[FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12255, Feb. 16, 2024]
#### § 109-40.305-50 [Reserved]