alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 302-7.401 What method of transportation and payment should we authorize for shipment and temporary storage of HHG? There are two methods of arranging and paying for shipment of HHG and providing for temporary storage: actual expense and commuted rate. You must authorize actual expense or commuted rate, depending on which is less costly to the Government. You must then specify the selected method on the relocation travel authorization. ( a ) *Actual expense method.* Under the actual expense method, the Government assumes the responsibility for arranging and paying for the actual expenses of all aspects of shipping the employee's HHG, including PBP&E, if any. These expenses may include but are not limited to: Packing/unpacking, crating/uncrating, pickup/delivery, weighing, line-haul, drayage, and temporary storage. This method is used for all shipments to/from/between OCONUS, and within CONUS where deemed economical to the Government.
( b ) *Commuted rate system.* ( 1 ) Under the commuted rate system, the employee assumes total responsibility for arranging and paying for the expenses of all aspects of shipping the employee's HHG, including PBP&E, if any. These expenses may include but are not limited to: Packing/unpacking, crating/uncrating, pickup/delivery, weighing, line-haul, drayage, and temporary storage. This method is used only for shipments within CONUS, and only where it is less costly to the Government than actual expense. The employee may arrange for shipment with a commercial HHG carrier or may rent self-drive equipment for a do-it-yourself move.
( 2 ) The commuted rate is calculated based on published HHG tariffs applied to the actual weight of the goods being shipped (subject also to the weight limitation in §§ 302-7.2 through 302-7.5).
( 3 ) If a PBP&E shipment causes the weight of a shipment under the commuted rate method to exceed the 18,000 pounds net weight allowance for HHG, then the actual cost of shipping that excess weight attributed to the PBP&E may be paid as an administrative expense of the agency. In this case, all related transportation arrangements (e.g., packing/unpacking, crating/uncrating, pickup/delivery, weighing, temporary storage, etc.) associated with shipping this excess weight will be handled and paid for by the agency (*see* § 302-7.5 for the process of determining what will paid for by the agency).
§ 0.283 Authority delegated. The Chief, Media Bureau, is delegated authority to perform all functions of the Bureau, described in § 0.61, provided that the following matters shall be referred to the Commission en banc for disposition: ( a ) Notices of proposed rulemaking and of inquiry and final orders in such proceedings, with the exception of rulemaking proceedings involving the allotment of FM and television channels.
( b ) Application for review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority, except that the Chief of the Media Bureau may dismiss any such application that does not contain any statement required under § 1.115(a) or (b) of this chapter, or does not comply with the filing requirements of § 1.115(d) or (f) of this chapter.
( c ) Matters that present novel questions of law, fact or policy that cannot be resolved under existing precedents and guidelines.
( d ) The imposition, reduction or cancellation of forfeitures pursuant to section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, in amounts of more than $20,000.
[67 FR 13220, Mar. 21, 2002, as amended at 86 FR 12547, Mar. 4, 2021]
No. 10-10938.

#### Santos Arroyo *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: 22-1083: NETFLIX, INC. v. DIVX, LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential
# Comments on: 22-1658: BRAYMAN v. MCDONOUGH [ORDER], Nonprecedential
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16495]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,251 and TA-W-37,703]


Beloit Millpro Service Center, Hattiesburg, MS and Beloit 
Manhattan, Neenah, WI; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, investigations 
were initiated on January 18, 2000 and May 22, 2000, in response to a 
worker petitions which were filed on behalf of workers at Beloit 
Millpro Service Center, Hattiesburg, Mississippi (TA-W-37,251) and 
Beloit Manhattan, Neenah, Wisconsin (TA-W-37,703), respectively.
    During the investigations, it was discovered that both facilities 
are under existing investigations. The workers are currently under the 
following investigations: Beloit Millpro Service Center, Hattiesburg, 
Mississippi (TA-W-37,562G) and Beloit Manhattan, Neenah, Wisconsin (TA-
W-37,562J).
    Consequently further investigations in these cases (TA-W-37,251 and 
TA-W-37,703) would serve no purpose, and the investigations have been 
terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 15th day of June, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-16495 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
§ 50-204.31 Reports of overexposure and excessive levels and concentrations. ( a ) In addition to any notification required by § 50-204.30 each employer shall make a report in writing within 30 days to the Regional Director of the appropriate Wage and Labor Standards Administration, Office of Occupational Safety of the Bureau of Labor Standards of the U.S. Department of Labor, for employees not protected by AEC by means of 10 CFR part 20, or under § 50-204.34(b) of this part, or the requirements of the laws and regulations of States named in § 50-204.34(c), of each exposure of an individual to radiation or concentrations of radioactive material in excess of any applicable limit in this subpart. Each report required under this paragraph shall describe the extent of exposure of persons to radiation or to radioactive material; levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, the cause of the exposure, levels of concentrations; and corrective steps taken or planned to assure against a recurrence.
( b ) In any case where an employer is required pursuant to the provisions of this section to report to the U.S. Department of Labor any exposure of an individual to radiation or to concentrations of radioactive material, the employer shall also notify such individual of the nature and extent of exposure. Such notice shall be in writing and shall contain the following statement: “You should preserve this report for future reference.”
#### § 51-2.1 Membership.

Under the JWOD Act, the Committee is composed of 15 members appointed by the President. There is one representative from each of the following departments or agencies of the Government: The Department of Agriculture, the Department of Defense, the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of Education, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Justice, the Department of Labor, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the General Services Administration. Four members are private citizens: One who is conversant with the problems incident to the employment of blind individuals; one who is conversant with the problems incident to the employment of persons with other severe disabilities; one who represents blind individuals employed in qualified nonprofit agencies for the blind; and one who represents persons with severe disabilities (other than blindness) employed in qualified nonprofit agencies employing persons with severe disabilities.
#### § 302-7.11 Is property acquired en route eligible for transportation at Government expense?

No, property acquired en route will not be eligible for transportation at Government expense.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18340, Apr. 1, 2011]
§ 304-3.10 Is my agency's acceptance of a waived or discounted registration fee from a non-Federal sponsor of a meeting or similar function considered a payment in kind for the day(s) I am participating as a speaker, panelist, or presenter at the event? ( a ) No. Your agency's acceptance of a waived or discounted registration fee from the non-Federal sponsor of the event is not a payment in kind for the day(s) you are participating as a speaker, panelist, or presenter. However, your agency's acceptance of a waived or discounted registration fee is a payment in kind for the days you only attend the event (*i.e.,* on the day(s) you are not participating as a speaker, panelist, or presenter).
( b ) Lodging, transportation, meals, event tickets, or other similar items of value provided by a non-Federal source are a payment in kind. If these types of expenses are included in a registration fee that is waived or discounted on the day(s) you are participating as a speaker, panelist, or presenter, you may accept them only with your agency's approval in accordance with this chapter. Specifically, if the registration fee includes meal(s), the meal(s) are a payment in kind. You may accept the meal(s) only if authorized to do so by your agency. If your agency authorizes acceptance of meal(s), you must also deduct the meal(s) from your M&IE per diem on your travel voucher using the deduction amounts listed for the locality at *https://www.gsa.gov/mie* unless you are unable to consume the meal(s) due to an exception provided in § 301-11.18 of this chapter.
[84 FR 55248, Oct. 16, 2019]
§ 50-204.3 Material handling and storage. ( a ) Where mechanical handling equipment is used, sufficient safe clearances shall be allowed for aisles, at loading docks, through doorways and wherever turns or passage must be made. Aisles and passageways shall be kept clear and in good repair, with no obstruction across or in aisles that could create a hazard. Permanent aisles and passageways shall be appropriately marked.
( b ) Storage of material shall not create a hazard. Bags, containers, bundles, etc. stored in tiers shall be stacked, blocked, interlocked and limited in height so that they are stable and secure against sliding or collapse.
( c ) Storage areas shall be kept free from accumulation of materials that constitute hazards from tripping, fire, explosion, or pest harborage. Vegetation control will be exercised when necessary.
( d ) Proper drainage shall be provided.
( e ) Clearance signs to warn of clearance limits shall be provided.
( f ) Derail and/or bumper blocks shall be provided on spur railroad tracks where a rolling car could contact other cars being worked, enter a building, work or traffic area.
( g ) Covers and/or guard rails shall be provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc.
[34 FR 7946, May 20, 1969; 35 FR 1015, Jan. 24, 1970]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                          49,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               258,040
<PP&E>                                         166,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 424,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          466,318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,813
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,565,551)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   424,704
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,060
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (1,654,427)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,750,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,750,095)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.116)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.116)


</TABLE>
§ 302-10.204 What costs are allowed for preparing a mobile home for shipment? Allowable costs for preparing a mobile home for shipment include but are not limited to: ( a ) Blocking and unblocking (including anchoring and unanchoring);
( b ) Labor costs of removing and installing skirting;
( c ) Separating, preparing, and sealing each section for movement;
( d ) Reassembling the two halves of a double-wide mobile home;
( e ) Travel lift fees;
( f ) Rental, installation, removal and transportation of hitches and extra axles with wheels and tires;
( g ) Purchasing blocks in lieu of transporting blocks from old official station and cost of replacement blocks broken while mobile home was being transported;
( h ) Packing and unpacking of HHG associated with the mobile home;
( i ) Disconnecting and connecting utilities;
( j ) Installation and removal of towing lights on trailer;
( k ) Charges for reasonable extension of existing water and sewer lines; and
( l ) Dismantling and assembling a portable room appended to a mobile home.
13 April 2016

073P16

074P16

075P16

#### American Mechanical, Inc. v. Jeffrey L. Bostic, Michael Hartnett, and Joseph E. Bostic, Jr. Yates Construction Company, Inc. v. Jeffrey L. Bostic, Michael Hartnett, and Joseph E. Bostic, Jr. Phillips and Jordan, Inc. v. Jeffrey L. Bostic, Michael Hartnett, and Joseph E. Bostic, Jr.

Pits’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-385; COA15-422; COA15-525)

Denied
No. 11-9643.

#### Ramirez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 877

To provide for the comparable treatment of Federal employees and Members

of Congress and the President during a period in which there is a

Federal Government shutdown.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Mr. STEARNS (for himself and Mrs. MORELLA) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide for the comparable treatment of Federal employees and Members of Congress and the President during

a period in which there is a Federal Government shutdown.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAY OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND THE

4 PRESIDENT DURING GOVERNMENT SHUT5 DOWNS.

6 (a) COMPARABLE PAY TREATMENT FOR MEMBERS

7 OF CONGRESS.—The basic pay of Members of Congress
2

HR 877 IH

1 shall be treated in the same manner as the basic pay of

2 the most adversely affected Federal employees who are not

3 compensated for any period in which—

4 (1) there is more than a 24-hour lapse in appropria5 tions for any Federal agency or department as a result

6 of a failure to enact a regular appropriations bill or con7 tinuing resolution; or

8 (2) the Federal Government is unable to make pay9 ments or meet obligations because the public debt limit

10 under section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, has

11 been reached.

12 (b) AUTHORITY TO PROMULGATE REGULATIONS.—

13 The Secretary of the Senate and the Chief Administrative

14 Officer of the House of Representatives shall promulgate

15 any regulations needed to implement this section in a

16 manner consistent with the Constitution of the United

17 States.

18 (c) COMPARABLE PAY TREATMENT FOR THE PRESI19 DENT OF THE UNITED STATES.—The basic pay of the

20 President of the United States shall be treated in the same

21 manner as the pay of Members of Congress described in

22 subsection (a).
3

HR 877 IH

1 (d) SEVERABILITY.—If any provision of this section

2 is held invalid by any Federal court, the remaining provi3 sions shall remain valid.

Æ
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 173-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anacomp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Linster W. Fox, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 ("Section
906"), that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  August 12, 2003

                                                     /s/Linster W. Fox
                                                     ___________________________
                                                     Linster W. Fox
                                                     Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Anacomp, Inc. and will be retained
by Anacomp,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 434 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 434

 To repeal the Act entitled ``An Act to designate the building located 
 at 1515 Sam Houston Street in Liberty, Texas, as the `M.P. Daniel and 
 Thomas F. Calhoon, Senior, Post Office Building''', approved May 17, 
                                 1990.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Wilson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the Act entitled ``An Act to designate the building located 
 at 1515 Sam Houston Street in Liberty, Texas, as the `M.P. Daniel and 
 Thomas F. Calhoon, Senior, Post Office Building''', approved May 17, 
                                 1990.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF BUILDING DESIGNATION.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to designate the building located at 1515 
Sam Houston Street in Liberty, Texas, as the `M.P. Daniel and Thomas F. 
Calhoon, Senior, Post Office Building''', approved May 17, 1990, is 
repealed.

                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 14, 2014

No. 04-14-00300-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.J.M. AND H.J.M., CHILDREN,

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29724

Honorable Sergio J. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee's second motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. 

Appellee's brief is due on or before December 10, 2014.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of November, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 10-11241.

#### Chestnut *v.*South Carolina Department of Corrections et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: 21-1784: ROBINSON v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION], Nonprecedential
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4348

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit proxy

voting and to amend title 18, United States Code, to criminalize the

practice commonly called ‘‘ghost voting’’ in the House of Representatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1994

Mr. WALKER introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Rules and the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to

prohibit proxy voting and to amend title 18, United

States Code, to criminalize the practice commonly called

‘‘ghost voting’’ in the House of Representatives.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROXY VOTING.

4 Clause 2(f) of rule VII of the Rules of the House

5 of Representatives is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(f) No vote by any member of any committee or sub7 committee with respect to any measure or matter may be

8 cast by proxy.’’.
2

HR 4348 IH

1 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 29 of title 18, United

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow4 ing:

5 ‘‘§ 611. Voting for another representative

6 ‘‘(a) Whoever, being a Member of the House of Rep7 resentatives—

8 ‘‘(1) authorizes another Member of the House

9 of Representatives to cast the vote, or to record the

10 presence, of the authorizing Member in the House of

11 Representatives; or

12 ‘‘(2) casts the vote, or records the presence, of

13 another Member of the House of Representatives in

14 the House of Representatives;

15 shall be fined an amount that equals the annual sal16 ary that Member of the House of Representatives is

17 receiving for service in the House at the time of the

18 offense.

19 ‘‘(b) As used in this section, the term ‘Member of

20 the House of Representatives’ means a Representative in,

21 or a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Con22 gress.’’.

23 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

24 at the beginning of chapter 29 of title 18,
3

HR 4348 IH

1 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

2 following new item:

‘‘611. Voting for another representative.’’.

Æ