alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kenneth Hamik certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer; 2. Based on my knowledge, this  Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  Report; 4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  Report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions); a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.   Date:December 20, 2007By:/s/Kenneth HamikKenneth Hamik, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       7,468,539
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 27,932,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,161,163
<PP&E>                                       6,282,443
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,020,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,195,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,532,470
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    50,707,938
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,955,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,195,736
<SALES>                                      1,199,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            63,855,808
<CGS>                                          835,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,799,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            42,236,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             652,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,167,852
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,504,474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,663,378
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,663,378
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76


</TABLE>
#### § 51-9.102-1 Specific exemptions.

Systems of records maintained by the Committee which have been exempted from certain requirements of the Privacy Act are designated in subpart 51-9.6 of this part. An individual shall have access to all exempted records containing information about him under procedures outlined in subpart 51-9.3 of this part. Upon request, an individual shall receive an accounting of any disclosure of information about him.
Exhibit 10.2

**Confidential Treatment Requested


E-LOAN/zipRealty
                  Amendment Two to Marketing, Promotion, Distribution,
                  And Related Services Agreement

This Amendment Two ("Amendment") to the Marketing, Promotion,
Distribution, And Related Services Agreement dated April 15, 2002 (the
"Agreement"), by and between E-LOAN, Inc. and zipRealty, Inc., amends,
modifies and supplements the Agreement as set forth below. All terms of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless expressly amended,
modified or supplemented herein.

1. Term.
2. Compensation.
3. Counterparts.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed and
dated below.

|E- LOAN, INC.                                 | zipRealty, Inc.                         
|--------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------
|By:      __/s/    ___ Joseph  Kennedy________ | By:      __/s/  Gary M. Beasley_________
|Name: __Joseph J. Kennedy________             | Name: __Gary M. Beasley________         
|Title:   __President________________          | Title:   __CFO__________________        
|Date:   __8/22/03_________________            | Date:   ___8/22/03_______________       

E-LOAN - zipRealty
   Amendment Two to Marketing, Promotion, Distribution, and Related Services Agreement

**Confidential Treatment Requested
112P16

#### Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids, Michigan v. Charles Raines, Martha Rains, and Sherri Griggs

Defs’ (Charles Raines and Martha Raines) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-978)

Denied
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Section
      1350**


**CERTIFICATION**








The
      undersigned officer hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation for the quarter ended September
      24,
      2006 as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in such Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of COMFORCE Corporation.





Signed
      November 2, 2006.








/s/ John
                C. FanningJohn
                C. Fanning,Chairman
                and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Alpine Group, Inc. (the "Company") for
the three months ended June 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report"), I, David A. Owen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|Date: August 14, 2003 |  | /s/DAVID A. OWENDavid A. Owen Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

ACTION:  Notice of Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Unconventional 
Nuclear Warfare Defense will meet in closed session on July 10-11, 
2000, at Strategic Analysis, Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500, 
Arlington, VA. This Task Force will determine the adequacy of DoD's 
ability to detect, identify, respond, and prevent unconventional 
nuclear attacks by terrorists or subnational entities, and the 
appropriate role(s) and capability of DoD to provide protection against 
unconventional nuclear attacks in support of homeland defense.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will review and evaluate 
the Department's ability to provide information.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings, concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly 
these meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: June 22, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-16259 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.20000 Purpose. Pursuant to the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), Public Law 103-414, 108 Stat. 4279 (1994) (codified as amended in sections of 18 U.S.C. and 47 U.S.C.), this subpart contains rules that require a telecommunications carrier to: ( a ) Ensure that any interception of communications or access to call-identifying information effected within its switching premises can be activated only in accordance with appropriate legal authorization, appropriate carrier authorization, and with the affirmative intervention of an individual officer or employee of the carrier acting in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Commission; and
( b ) Implement the assistance capability requirements of CALEA section 103, 47 U.S.C. 1002, to ensure law enforcement access to authorized wire and electronic communications or call-identifying information.
#### IN THE MATTER OF STEVE K. MYERS.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 588)

(389 SE2d 244)

Decided January 24, 1990.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Paula J. Frederick, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Per curiam.

Steve K. Myers filed a petition for voluntary surrender of his license for violation of Standards 21, 22, 23, 44 and 68 of Rule 4-102 of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia. He admits that due to his own emotional problems, he abandoned his clients and failed to return their property, their retainer, and to properly withdraw from their employment, but has since returned the clients’ file and made restitution.

The Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board recommends that this court allow Mr. Myers to voluntarily surrender his license. This recommendation is approved and adopted.

*All the Justices concur, except Fletcher, J., not participating.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6273

DONTE JAVON JORDAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-03-290-2)

Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 18, 2004

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donte Javon Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Donte Javon Jordan seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge

recommended that relief be denied and advised Jordan that failure

to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive

appellate review of a district court order based upon the

recommendation. Despite this warning, Jordan failed to object to

the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See

Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Jordan has waived appellate

review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 10-11236.

#### Fogle *v.*Slack et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.727 Cross-complaints and counterclaims.

Cross-complaints seeking any relief within the jurisdiction of the Commission against any party (complainant or defendant) to that proceeding are prohibited. Any claim that might otherwise meet the requirements of a cross-complaint may be filed as a separate complaint in accordance with §§ 1.720 through 1.740. For purposes of this subpart, the term “cross-complaint” shall include counterclaims.

[83 FR 44832, Sept. 4, 2018]
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2805

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jose Corio-Raymundo, also known as Jose Raymundo-Corio

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids

 ____________

 Submitted: April 17, 2019

 Filed: April 22, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Jose Corio-Raymundo was found guilty of knowingly

using a forged identification document as evidence of authorized employment, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a), and of misusing for tax purposes a social security

number not assigned to him, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B). The district
court sentenced Corio-Raymundo to six months in prison and three years of 1

supervised release, and he appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence

supporting the jury verdict and the reasonableness of the sentence.

The evidence at trial established, in part, that Corio-Raymundo acknowledged

his work ineligibility during an encounter with an Immigration and Customs

Enforcement employee earlier in the year before he provided an employer with a

Form I-9 and a Form W-4 bearing his name and a social security account number

assigned to another person, as well as a fraudulent version of a social security card

with Corio-Raymundo’s name and thatsame socialsecurity account number. Viewed

in a light most favorable to the verdict, this evidence was sufficient to prove the

elements of the offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v.

Machorro-Xochicale, 840 F.3d 545, 548 (8th Cir. 2016) (setting forth standard of

review and elements of offenses), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 1214 (2017). We also reject

Corio-Raymundo’s challenge to the reasonableness of his six-month prison sentence

because we conclude that the district court, after considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

sentencing factors, did not abuse it’s discretion. See United States v. Callaway, 762

F.3d 754, 760-61 (8th Cir. 2014) (presuming reasonableness of within-Guidelines

sentence). 

The judgment is affirmed. 

______________________________

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern 1

District of Iowa.

-2-
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-701.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

Marine Equipment 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the EUROPEAN COMMUNITY 

Signed at Washington February 27, 2004 

 with 

Annexes 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
EUROPEAN COMMUNITY 

Trade: Marine Equipment 

Agreement signed at Washington February 27, 2004; 

 Entered into force July 1, 2004. 

 With annexes. 


























Note: Only English language will be printed in this publication.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-1604: ROLAND CORPORATION v. INMUSICBRANDS, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lpuX1uhYyG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-14-2022-21-1604-roland-corporation-v-inmusicbrands-inc-order-21-1604-order-3-11-2022_1920487\/\">21-1604: ROLAND CORPORATION v. INMUSICBRANDS, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/03-14-2022-21-1604-roland-corporation-v-inmusicbrands-inc-order-21-1604-order-3-11-2022_1920487\/embed\/#?secret=lpuX1uhYyG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-1604: ROLAND CORPORATION v. INMUSICBRANDS, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"lpuX1uhYyG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: ROLAND CORPORATION v. INMUSICBRANDS, INC. [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-1604 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
bpJ ST+ 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

.%c pR&" ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

DATE: 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

THRU: 

December 17,20 10 

Additional Information for the Technical Support Document for Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking -Rome, Georgia nonattainrnent Area: Determination of 

Attaining Data for the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter Standard 

Sara Waterson, Environmental Scientist 

Regulatory Development Section 

File 

Chief, Regulatory Development Section 

Lynorae Benj arnin 'e 

This memorandum provides clarifying information in support of EPA's technical support 

document and the proposed rulemakiig which preliminarily makes the determination that the 

Rome Area has attained the 1997 PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). 

Data substitution was performed by taking the quarterly maximum concentration for the 

corresponding quarter, using years 2007 - 2009, and substituting that max value for the missing 

concentration. The average concentration for the most recent three years of available data, i.e., 

2007 - 2009, with data substitution was 14.6 micrograms per cubic meter (pg/m3). This average 

concentration is consistent with attainment of the NAAQS. Since the quarterly max value data 

substitution test resulted in an attaining design value, the design value without data substitution is 

the official design value. which is 13.3 pg/m3. 

Internet Address (URL) http:llw.epa.gov 

RecycledlRecyclable Pr~nted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Pos~co~~su~?~)