alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FILED AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997             JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997             JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                               5                   1,448
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,505                   5,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                       218                      70
<INVENTORY>                                      8,700                   6,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,528                  13,532
<PP&E>                                          57,089                  39,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,617                   5,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,739                  49,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,199                   5,348
<BONDS>                                         27,131                  18,860
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              300                     550
<PREFERRED>                                        153                     270
<COMMON>                                        19,016                  19,016
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,940                   5,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,739                  49,894
<SALES>                                         69,339                  49,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,339                  49,558
<CGS>                                           58,357                  43,318
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,536                  44,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   104                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,773                   2,022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,926                   2,622
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,926                   2,618
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,926                   2,618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40                     .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40                     .69
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4237

To prohibit the possession in a public housing zone of a firearm the possession

of which is otherwise unlawful, and to prohibit the discharge of a firearm

in a public housing zone.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 18, 1994

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit the possession in a public housing zone of a

firearm the possession of which is otherwise unlawful,

and to prohibit the discharge of a firearm in a public

housing zone.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun-Free Public Hous5 ing Zones Act of 1994’’.
2

•HR 4237 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST ILLEGAL POSSESSION OR

2 DISCHARGE OF A FIREARM IN A PUBLIC

3 HOUSING ZONE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 922 of title 18, United

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow6 ing:

7 ‘‘(v)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess

8 a firearm, in violation of any other Federal law or of any

9 State or local law, at a place that the person knows, or

10 has reasonable cause to believe, is in a public housing

11 zone.

12 ‘‘(2)(A) It shall be unlawful for any person, know13 ingly or with reckless disregard for the safety of another,

14 to discharge or attempt to discharge a firearm at a place

15 that the person knows is in a public housing zone.

16 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to the dis17 charge of a firearm—

18 ‘‘(i) by a person employed by a public housing

19 agency to provide security for a public housing

20 project in the public housing zone, acting within the

21 scope of such employment; or

22 ‘‘(ii) by a law enforcement officer acting in his

23 or her official capacity.’’.

24 (b) DEFINITIONS.—Section 921(a) of such title is

25 amended by adding at the end the following:
3

•HR 4237 IH

1 ‘‘(30)(A) The term ‘public housing zone’ means in or

2 upon—

3 ‘‘(i) the real property comprising the public

4 housing projects of any public housing agency; or

5 ‘‘(ii) any public property which is at a distance

6 of not more than 1,000 feet from property referred

7 to in clause (i).

8 ‘‘(B) The terms ‘project’, ‘public housing’, and ‘public

9 housing agency’ shall have the meanings given such terms

10 in section 3(b) of the Housing Act of 1937.’’.

11 (c) PENALTIES.—Section 924(a)(4) of such title is

12 amended by striking ‘‘922(q)’’ each place such term ap13 pears and inserting ‘‘subsection (q) or (v) of section 922’’.

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

15 this section shall apply to conduct engaged in after the

16 end of the 60-day period that begins with the date of the

17 enactment of this Act.

18 (e) GUN-FREE ZONE SIGNS.—Federal, State, and

19 local authorities are encouraged to cause signs to be post20 ed around public housing zones (within the meaning of

21 section 921(a)(30) of title 18, United States Code) giving

22 warning of prohibition against the illegal possession of a

23 firearm in such zones.

Æ
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


February 9, 2017


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 295


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on February 8, 2017, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms
and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-215133) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                               


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–684

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4690, THE DEPARTMENTS

OF COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY AND RELATED

AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001

JUNE 21 (legislative day, JUNE 20), 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and

ordered to be printed

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 529]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 529, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 4690, the

Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary and

Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001, under an open rule.

The rule provides one hour of general debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The rule provides that the bill shall be

considered for amendment by paragraph. The rule waives all points

of order against consideration of the bill. The rule waives points of

order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause

2 of rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized or legislative provisions in

a general appropriations bill or prohibiting reappropriations in a

general appropriations bill), except as specified in the rule.

The rule authorizes the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

to accord priority in recognition to Members who have preprinted

their amendments in the Congressional Record. The rule permits

the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole to postpone votes

during consideration of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five

minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows a fifteen

minute vote. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit,

with or without instructions.

The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of clause 4 of

rule XIII (requiring a three-day layover of a committee report)

2

which is necessary because the report was filed on Monday, June

19th and H.R. 4690 may be considered on the floor as early as

Wednesday, June 21st. A waiver of clause 2 of rule XXI is also necessary because the bill contains at least 30 legislative provisions

and over 60 unauthorized programs in the bill, which are detailed

in the Appropriations Committee’s report (H. Rept. 106–680).

Æ
SALINAAirport 

Oiainnan Wee Chairman Stcntary Treasurer PastOMHtman 

Jeffrey ft. Thompson Dr. Randy Hassler Daran Netudufer JeffMaes Julie SajerHiUer 

TMENT OF 

^ur[lniju,i^. 

^ r ! L; P 19: ? • 

[xecutlve Director Timothy F. Rogers, A.A.E. 

Mgr. ofAdfflinistratfon and Riuttce Michelle ft. Swanson Mgr.ofOperatfoiu David'Gunner" Wiles f4gr*of FadUtiesltennyBiekcr 

Mgr. of Pubtic Affairs and Cocnmunkatiottt Melissa L. McCoy 

Board Attorney Greg A. Benglson 

December 9, 2011 

Mr. Todd M. Horman 

Director 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Essential Air Service at Saiina, Kansas 

Docl^et DOT-OST 2002 - 11376 

Dear IVIr. Horman: 

The Saiina Airport Authority supports the SeaPort Airlines' proposal for 2012 - 2014 EAS 

Program service at Saiina, KS. SeaPort has provided excellent service to Saiina and Saline 

County residents since April 2010. The airline is overcoming the challenge of rebuilding the 

Saiina market following poor performance by the 2008 - 2010 Saiina EAS provider. 

SeaPort's efforts would be enhanced by a U.S. DOT decision to award SeaPort a four (4) year 

contract. A four (4) year contract would allow the airline and community to implement a longer 

term marketing program and increase passenger confidence. 

The Airport Authority is committed to partner with SeaPort to rebuild the Saiina market and 

bring total passenger enplanements to a level greater than an average of 625 per month. 

Thank you for considering our comments as your office finalizes the 2012 EAS contract for 

Saiina. 

Respectfully submitted, 

SALINA AIRPORT AUTHORITY 

Timothy F. Rogers, A.A.E. 

Executive Director 

TFR/ge 

F:\Public\MsOffice\Multi Aplication Folders\Air Service\EAS\2011 Correspondence\Horman_Ltr 12-9-11 -Rogers.doc 

''fNAirport 3237 AmoW / sauna, KS 67401-8190 / 785.827.3914 / Fax: 785.827.2221 SALINA^^'POli 

^ www.sal1naairport.com 9Miluilual6»HlM
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3041704-NOV-201008:50 AM
#### § 302-17.51 When should I file my “Statement of Income and Tax Filing Status” under the one-year process?

For the one-year process, you should file this form as soon as you receive your relocation orders, or as soon as you file your tax returns for the most recent tax year, whichever occurs later.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1908 Omissions not a defense.

The failure or omission of the Commission to comply with any provision in this regulation shall not serve as a defense to any debtor.
#### § 301-52.3 Am I required to file a travel claim in a specific format and must the claim be signed?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77027, Sept. 20, 2024.

As soon as your agency fully deploys the E-Gov Travel Service (ETS), you must use the ETS to file all your travel claims. (Agencies are required to fully deploy the ETS no later than September 30, 2006.) Until that time, you must file your travel claim in the format prescribed by your agency. If the prescribed travel claim is hardcopy, the claim must be signed in ink. Any alterations or erasures to your hardcopy travel claim must be initialed. If your agency has electronic processing, use your electronic signature where required.

[FTR Amdt. 2003-07, 68 FR 71030, Dec. 22, 2003, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2006-04, 71 FR 49375, Aug. 23, 2006; FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61539, Oct. 31, 2007]
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: December 11, 2014 105797

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RALPH HAROLD JR., Also Known as ESSENCE HAROLD, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: November 21, 2014 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________ Carl J. Silverstein, Monticello, for appellant. D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Devine, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered February 6, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sexual act in the first degree. In satisfaction of a five-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sexual act in the first degree. Under the terms of the plea agreement, defendant was to be sentenced to 15 years in prison, followed by 15 years of postrelease supervision. At sentencing, County Court imposed a prison term of 15 years with 20 years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.-2- 105797

Defendant's contention that the period of postrelease supervision imposed did not conform to the plea agreement is not preserved for our review given defendant's failure to object at the time of sentencing (see People v Wright, 89 AD3d 1232, 1232 [2011]). Nevertheless, because the record demonstrates that County Court specifically committed to sentence defendant to a 15-year-period of postrelease supervision, we will exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction and modify the sentence imposed by sentencing defendant to the agreed-upon 15 years of postrelease supervision (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]). We note that since County Court found the agreed-upon sentence to be appropriate, "defendant need not be provided an opportunity to withdraw his plea as our modification gives effect to the promise which had originally induced defendant's plea" (People v Wright, 89 AD3d at 1233 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). To the extent that defendant challenges the agreed-upon sentence as harsh and excessive, we find no extraordinary circumstances nor an abuse of discretion so as to warrant a reduction of the negotiated sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Davis, 114 AD3d 1003, 1004 [2014], lv denied 23 NY3d 962 [2014]). Finally, even if defendant's challenge to the effectiveness of his counsel were preserved for our review (see People v Wasley, 119 AD3d 1216, 1216 [2014]), we would find it to be without merit as the record demonstrates that defendant was provided with meaningful representation (see People v Cancer, 16 AD3d 835, 839-840 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 826 [2005]). McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.-3- 105797

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the period of postrelease supervision to 15 years, and, as so modified, affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7196
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY A. BLAGROVE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-52, CA-96-599) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 4, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony A. Blagrove, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Anthony A. Blagrove seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his first motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, dismissing his next three § 2255 motions and denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Blagrove , Nos. CR-95-52, CA-96-599 (E.D. Va. July 11, 1996). Blagrove's motion for appointment of counsel is also denied. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Comments on: 22-2245: EDWARDS v. OPM [ORDER], Nonprecedential
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16489]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as amended by Pub. L. 104-13; 
Submission for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment 
Request

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority

ACTION: Submission for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; 
comment request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The proposed information collection described below will be 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, 
as amended). The Tennessee Valley Authority is soliciting public 
comments on this proposed collection as provided by 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1). 
Requests for information, including copies of the information 
collection proposed and supporting documentation, should be directed to 
the Agency Clearance Officer: Wilma H. McCauley, Tennessee Valley 
Authority, 1101 Market Street (EB 5B), Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-
2801; (423) 751-2523.
    Comments should be sent to OMB Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Attention: Desk Officer for Tennessee Valley Authority no 
later than July 31, 2000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Type of Request: Regular submission, proposal to reinstate, with 
change, a previously approved collection for which approval has 
expired.
    Title of Information Collection: Employment Applications.
    Frequency of Use: On occasion.
    Type of Affected Public: Individuals.
    Small Businesses or Organizations Affected: No.
    Federal Budget Functional Category Code: 999.
    Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 17,583.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 15,913.
    Estimated Average Burden Hours Per Response: 1.
    Need For and Use of Information: Applications for employment are 
needed to collect information on qualifications, suitability for 
employment, and eligibility for veterans preference. The information is 
used to make comparative appraisals and to assist in selections. The 
affected public consists of individuals who voluntarily apply for TVA 
employment.

Jacklyn J. Stephenson,
Senior Manager, Enterprise Operations. Information Services
[FR Doc. 00-16489 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
§ 60-30.33 Discovery. ( a ) Any party may serve requests for admissions in accordance with § 60-30.9 (b) and (c).
( b ) Witness lists and hearing exhibits will be exchanged at least 10 days in advance of the hearing.
( c ) For good cause shown, and upon motion made in accordance with § 60-30.8, the Administrative Law Judge may allow the taking of depositions. Other discovery will not be permitted.
#### § 304-4.1 To whom do the pronouns “we”, “you”, and their variants refer throughout this part?

Use of pronouns “we”, “you”, and their variants throughout this part refers to the agency.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-1018 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CIVIL AVIATION 

Safety 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ROMANIA 

Signed at Bucharest September 10, 2002 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
ROMANIA 

Civil Aviation: Safety 

 Agreement signed at Bucharest September 10, 2002; 

 Entered into force October 18, 2004.
#### § 302-4.705 What are the allowances if the employee uses more POVs than authorized?

If the employee uses more POVs than authorized, reimbursement will be made as if all persons traveled in the number of POVs that you authorized.
#### § 60-40.4 Information disclosure of which is prohibited by law.

The Standard Form 100 (EEO-1) which is submitted by contractors to the OFCCP or a Joint Reporting Committee servicing both the OFCCP and the EEOC shall be disclosed pending further instructions from the Director. The statutory prohibition on disclosure set forth in section 709(e) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is limited by the terms of that section to information obtained pursuant to the authority of title VII of that Act and its disclosure by employees of the EEOC.