alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15787]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2392-000]


Fresno Cogeneration Partners, L.P.; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 19, 2000.
    Fresno Cogeneration Partners, L.P. (Fresno) submitted for filing a 
rate schedule under which Fresno will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions as a marketer. Fresno also requested 
waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, Fresno 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by Fresno.
    On June 9, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Fresno should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Fresno is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Fresno's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 10, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, 
DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15787 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-17.

#### Park *v.*Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
R e g u l a t i o n s f r o m w h i c h e x e m p t i o n i s r e q u e s t e d : 1 4 C

. F

. R

. P a r t 2 1 1 4 C

. F

. R

. 4 5

. 2 3 ( b ) 1 4 C

. F

. R

. 9 1

. 7 ( a ) 1 4 C

. F

. R

. 9 1

. 9 ( b ) ( 2 ) 1 4 C

. F

. R

. 9 1

. 1 0 9 1 4 C

. F

. R

. 9 1

. 1 1 9 1 4 C

. F

. R

. 9 1

. 1 2 1 1 4 C

. F

. R

. 9 1

. 1 5 1 ( a ) 1 4 C

. F

. R

. 9 1

. 2 0 3 ( a ) & ( b ) 1 4 C

. F

. R

. 9 1

. 4 0 1

– 9 1

. 4 1 7

U n m a n n e d A i r c r a f t S y s t e m T h e s e d a y s U A S a r e o f t e n s e e n a s s u p e r i o r t o h e l i c o p t e r s a s a n a e r i a l v i d e o g a t h e r i n g p l a t f o r m d u e t o t h e s m a l l e r d e v i c e s , m o r e a f f o r d a b l e e q u i p m e n t a n d p e r s o n n e l c o s t

, r e d u c e d n o i s e a n d a s s u c h

, a m u c h s m a l l e r e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t

w h i c h p r o m o t e s p u b l i c s a f e t y

. A e r i a l p x l

, L L C i s p e t i t i o n i n g f o r a n e x e m p t i o n t o o p e r a t e a D J I I n s p i r e 1 w i t h a b u i l t

- i n s t a b i l i z e d 4 K c a m e r a a n d t h e f o l l o w i n g G P S s a f e t y f e a t u r e s :

• R e s t r i c t s t h e h e i g h t a b o v e g r o u n d l e v e l ( A G L ) t o a s p e c i f i e d u s e r

- g e n e r a t e d

h e i g h t

.

• R e s t r i c t s t h e r a d i u s o f f l i g h t f r o m t h e g r o u n d s t a t i o n t o a u s e r

- g e n e r a t e d

r a d i u s

.

• R e s t r i c t s o p e r a t i o n s w i t h i n d e s i g n a t e d C l a s s B

, C a n d D a i r s p a c e

i n c l u d i n g a n o

- f l y z o n e f e a t u r e

.

T h e D J I I n s p i r e 1 a l s o h a s a f a i l s a f e f u n c t i o n t h a t i s t r i g g e r e d i n t h e e v e n t

c o m m u n i c a t i o n s a r e l o s t b e t w e e n t h e U A S a n d t h e m a i n c o n t r o l l e r t r a n s m i t t e r

. I n t h e u n l i k e l y e v e n t t h i s o c c u r s , t h e U A S w i l l r e t u r n t o i t s p o i n t

o f t a k e o f f a n d l a n d s a f e t y

. I f c o m m u n i c a t i o n s a r e r e s t o r e d

, t h e P I C c a n
r e g a i n c o n t r o l o f f l i g h t a n d l a n d m a n u a l l y

. A l l d o c u m e n t a t i o n r e g a r d i n g D J I I n s p i r e 1 c a n b e d o w n l o a d e d h e r e : h t t p : / / w w w

. d j i

. c o m / p r o d u c t / i n s p i r e

- 1 / d o w n l o a d T h e s e s p e c i f i c a t i o n s m e e t w i t h t h e M o d e l A i r c r a f t O p e r a t i n g S t a n d a r d s ( A C 9 1

- 5 7 ) a s s e t b e l o w :

1

. T h e p e t i t i o n e r w i l l o n l y o p e r a t e i t s U A S i n l i n e

- o f

- s i g h t o f a p i l o t a n d / o r
o b s e r v e r a n d w i l l o p e r a t e a t s i t e s t h a t a r e ‘ s u f f i c i e n t d i s t a n c e ’ f r o m p o p u l a t e d a r e a s w i t h i n t h e s t e r i l e a r e a d e s c r i b e d i n t h e F O R M

. S u c h

o p e r a t i o n s w i l l e n s u r e t h a t t h e U A S w i l l “ n o t c r e a t e a h a z a r d t o u s e r s o f t h e n a t i o n a l a i r s p a c e s y s t e m o r t h e p u b l i c

. ”
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on April 11, 2000, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Advanced Technology Institute has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in the project status of the National Shipbuilding Research Program (“NSRP”). The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the general area of planned activity of the NSRP is to establish collaborative research efforts of limited duration to manage and  focus national shipbuilding research and development funding on technologies that will reduce the cost of warships to the Navy, and establish U.S. international shipbuilding competitiveness. NSRP also provides a collaborative forum to improve business and acquisition processes.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Advanced Technology Institute: National Shipbuilding Research Program intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 13, 1998, Advanced Technology Institute: National Shipbuilding Research Program filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 29, 1999 (64 FR 4708).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 5, 2000. A notice has not yet been published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-15998 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Stephen M. O’Hara                                    |  |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|   | Stephen                M. O’Hara                                        |
|   | Chairman,                President and Chief Executive                Officer |

----
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ALPHONSO INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

FREE STREAM MEDIA CORP., DBA SAMBA TV,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2019-2313

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:18-cv-01205-CFC, Judge 

Colm F. Connolly.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

INDRA NEEL CHATTERJEE, Goodwin Procter LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ELIZABETH J. LOW, ANDREW S. ONG; DAVID 

ZIMMER, Boston, MA. 

 WILLIAM P. NELSON, Tensegrity Law Group, LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by DANIEL RADKE, NATASHA SAPUTO, MATTHEW D.

POWERS, JENNIFER ROBINSON. 

 ______________________

Case: 19-2313 Document: 52 Page: 1 Filed: 09/11/2020
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LINN, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

September 11, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 19-2313 Document: 52 Page: 2 Filed: 09/11/2020
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439

PETER R. MARKSTEINER CLERK’S OFFICE

CLERK OF COURT 202-275-8000

March 22, 2019

New Process for Notifying Counsel of Accepted Scheduling Conflicts

On January 2, 2019, the court updated its procedures for considering argument 

scheduling conflicts, including requiring arguing counsel to show good cause for any 

identified scheduling conflict. See December 10, 2018 Notice. To assist with 

identifying which conflicts have been accepted, the court will begin notifying 

counsel which, if any, conflict dates are accepted as conflicts.

Effective April 8, 2019, the court is implementing the following modifications to its 

process for reviewing scheduling conflicts: 

1. The court will continue to review Responses to the Notice to Advise of

Scheduling Conflicts and determine whether the conflicts are accepted.

The limitations and requirements on scheduling conflicts in the December

10, 2018 notice continue to apply.

2. Only submitted conflict dates that are accepted by the court will be

indicated in a public docket notation. The docket notation will list the

name of the party, the attorney presenting argument, and all conflict

dates that are accepted by the court. Submitted conflict dates that are not

accepted will not be listed in the docket entry.

3. The non-acceptance of a submitted conflict date does not mean that the

case will be scheduled for argument on a non-accepted date. Counsel

should refrain from filing a motion to schedule or reschedule argument

until the case is actually scheduled for argument. Likewise, counsel

should avoid contacting the Clerk’s Office concerning conflict dates or

scheduling argument absent an emergency.

For questions or comments on these changes, please contact the Court Services 

team at 202-275-8035.
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–514

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY S. 376, THE ORBIT ACT

MARCH 8, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 432]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 432, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the Conference

Report to accompany S. 376, the ORBIT Act. The rule waives all

points of order against the conference report and against its consideration.

The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of clause 9 of

Rule XXII (violating the scope of the conference) because the conference report includes provisions not committed to the conference

committee by either chamber. A waiver of clause 7(d) of Rule XXII

(concerning the sufficiency of the joint explanatory statement accompanying a conference report) is also needed because the joint

explanatory statement may not contain sufficient detailes as required by rules of the House.

Æ
No. 11-1162.

#### MacPherson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

75–414 WASHINGTON : 2012

112th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 112–131 

TO INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED COST OF THE LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA, LOCAL FLOOD 

CONTROL AND RECREATION PROJECT 

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY, ARMY, CIVIL 

WORKS, THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

TRANSMITTING

RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS OF THE PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED COST OF THE LITTLE 

CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA, LOCAL FLOOD CONTROL AND 

RECREATION PROJECT 

AUGUST 2, 2012.—Referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure and ordered to be printed 

04:57 Aug 04 2012 Jkt 075414 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HD131 XXX HD131











(1)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
#### § 304-3.15 Must I provide my agency with information about any payment I receive on its behalf?

Yes. Your agency must submit to the U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) a semiannual report (SF 326) of all payments it accepts under this part. You must be prepared to give your agency the information it needs in order to submit its report.
Order filed September 12, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00622

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF J .J. AND T.J., CHILDR EN

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 03941J



### ORDER
This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issue. Appellant’s brief was due September 9 , 2019, but it has not been filed. Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed.
See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012). This accelerated schedule requires gr eater compliance with briefing deadlines. Therefore we order appellant’s appointed counsel, Angela Elisabeth Ellis to file appellant’s brief no later than September 23 , 2019

. If the brief is not filed bythat date, counsel may be required to show cause wh y he should not be held in

contempt of court. In addition, the court may require appointment of new counsel due to the failure to timely file appellant’s brief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Spain, and Poissant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000005656
<NAME>                                         American Precious Metals, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         172
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               675
<PP&E>                                         11,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (568)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          444,736
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6937
<OTHER-SE>                                     (32,890)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,846
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,948)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,948)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)



</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00197

- CR

Paul Lee Navarro v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2016

- DCR

- 01237

- E

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 12, 2018
No. 10-10914.

#### Bertanelli *v.*Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

BARRY BRADFORD, 

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, 

Respondent

______________________

2023-1875

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DA-0752-15-0186-I-1, DA-1221-15-0155-W-1.

______________________

O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to file the required 

Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

Case: 23-1875 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 08/04/2023
2 BRADFORD V. AIR FORCE 

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the 

same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

August 4, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Date Jarrett B. Perlow 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 4, 2023

Case: 23-1875 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 08/04/2023
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Solutions
Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period June 30, 2009 (the
"Report"), David J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, and President of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                      DATE: AUGUST 13, 2009

                      /S/ DAVID J. JOHNSON
                      --------------------
                      DAVID J. JOHNSON
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.