alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16275]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee for Energy-Related Epidemiologic Research: 
Cancellation of Meeting

    This notice announces the cancellation of previously announced 
meeting.

Federal Notice Citation of Previous Announcement

    Federal Register: June 13, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 114) [Notices]--
[Page 37153-37154].
    Change in the Meeting: This meeting has been cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Michael J. Sage, Executive 
Secretary, ACERER, and Acting Deputy Director, NCEH, CDC, 4770 Buford 
Highway, NE, (F-28), Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 770/488-
7002, fax 770/488-7015.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: June 22, 2000.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 00-16275 Filed 6-23-00; 10:29 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Jacob Inbar, Chief Executive Officer of AML Communications Inc.,(the “Company”), certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of AMLCommunications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
| Date: April 18, 2005    | By: Jacob Inbar |
|-------------------------|-----------------|
| /s/ Jacob Inbar         |            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |            |
|                         |                 |  |  |

 

----
397P15

#### State v. Marlette Toomer and Vernon Toomer

Def’s (Vernon Toomer) *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1246)

Denied
No. 11-9008.

#### Bobo *v.*Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Administrative Order No. 20-06 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit —and—

United States Court of 

Federal Claims

O R D E R

Restricting Court Access to the National Courts

Building Until October 19, 2020 

Based on continuing declared public health 

emergencies impacting Washington, D.C. and the National 

Capital Region, as well as ongoing efforts to mitigate 

community transmission and the impact of COVID-19, 

there is an ongoing need for the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States 

Court of Federal Claims to continue to restrict public 

access to the Howard T. Markey National Courts Building. 

On behalf of both courts, we find pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2071(e) that there is an immediate need for this Order

altering the rules of both courts, effective upon entry of this

Order.

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) Administrative Order No. 20-5 is hereby amended

to extend the access restrictions and procedures in

the joint order dated June 26, 2020 (Administrative

Order No. 20-4) until October 19, 2020.

By J. Perlow, Deputy Clerk 7:27 am, Sep 11 2020
2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

(2) The Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court of the

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal

Circuit, and the Clerk of Court for the United States

Court of Federal Claims are directed to provide

public notice of this Order and to take any necessary

and proper actions to implement these restrictions.

FOR THE COURTS

 September 11, 2020 /s/ Sharon Prost

 Date Sharon Prost 

Chief Judge

United States Court of

Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit

 September 11, 2020 /s/ Margaret M. Sweeney

 Date Margaret M. Sweeney

Chief Judge 

United States Court of 

Federal Claims
No. 10-11283.

#### Tibbetts *v.*Bobby, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40830

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

RAY M. NICHOLS

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 807

Filed: December 31, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS I S AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fo urth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Melissa Moody , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for correction of illegal sentence, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Spencer J. Hahn, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Mark W. Olson, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, fo r respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Ray M. Nichols was found guilty by a jury of robbery . I.C. § 18

- 6503 . The district court

sentenced Nichols to a fixed life term of imprisonment

. Nichols filed an I.C.R 35 motion for

correction of an illegal sentence, which the district court denied. Nichols appeals. 1

Mindful of I.C. §§ 18

- 6503 and 19

- 2513, Nichols contends that, at the time his sentence

was imposed, he could not be sentenced to “fixed life.” Pursuant to Rule 35, the distric t court

may correct an illegal sentence at any time. In an appeal from the denial of a motion under Rule

35 to correct an illegal sentence, the question of whether the sentence imposed is illegal is a

1 Nichols was also found guilty of burglary and sentenced to a concurrent determinate term of five years. However, he does not challenge this sentence on appeal.2 question of law freely reviewable by the appellate cou rt. State v. Josephson , 124 Idaho 286, 287,

858 P.2d 825, 826 (Ct. App. 1993); State v. Rodriguez , 119 Idaho 895, 897, 811 P.2d 505, 507

(Ct. App. 1991).

Having reviewed the record in this case, we conclude that Nichols has failed to

demonstrate that hi s sentence is illegal. Idaho Code Section 18

- 6503, when read with I.C. § 19

-
2513, provided that Nichols could be sentenced to a fixed life term. Thus, the district court did

not err in denying Nichols’s Rule 35 motion. Therefore, the district court’s order denying

Nichols ’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1







CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED – CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE COMMISSION


 



EXHIBIT A


CHANGE MANAGEMENT FORM


Comcast and Support.com


(No. 11 to SOW#3)


 


	
Program:  Support.com, Inc. (“Vendor”), XH Remote Support (“SOW 3”) dated March 21, 2014

	
PCR No.:


	
Originator:  Joy Park

	
Date:  12/12/16


	
Department: NCO

	
Phone #: [***]

	
Title:  Vice President


	
Locations Impacted: Work at Home


	
Requested Implementation Date: 01/01/17


	
Estimated Hours: (LOE)

	
☒  Billable         ☐Non-Billable

	
Billing Rate/Hour: See SOW


	
Fixed Fee Cost (if applicable)


	
Type of Change:  Extend Term of CMF


	
Scope of Change:

	
☒  Minor (Anything within current contract)

	
☐Major (may require contract amendment)


MUST BE REVIEWED BY Business and/or P&L Owner


	
Reason for Change: Comcast and Vendor agree to extend the term of the CMF for the XH Incentive dated May 24, 2016 as stated in detail below.  Unless specifically provided in this Change Management Form, all other terms of SOW 3 remain unchanged.


	
Area(s) of Change


	
☐   Accounting/Payroll

	
☐   Network


	
☐   Data Processing

	
☐   Resource Planning


	
☐   General Facilities

	
☐   Quality Assurance


	
☐   Human Resources

	
☐   Telecom


	
☐   IT/BI

	
☐   Training


	
☐   Operations

	
☐   Recruiting


	
☒   Other:  Extend Term


	
Effective January 1, 2017, the parties, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, agree to extend the term of the CMF for the XH Incentive dated May 24, 2016 from [***] to [***].  Notwithstanding the foregoing, Comcast shall have the right to terminate this incentive, at any time and for any reason.










Comcast Authorization


	
Comcast Representative’s Signature

	
/s/ Joy Park











	
Print Name

	
Joy Park

	
Date

	
02/06/2017












Support.com Authorization



	
Support.com Representative’s Signature

	
/s/ Roop Lakkaraju









 



	
Print Name

	
Roop Lakkaraju

	
Date

	
12/15/2016







 


*** CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL REDACTED AND SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE COMMISSION ***
§ 301-71.202 May we pay a claim when an employee does not include a copy of the corresponding authorization? Yes, as long as the travel claim was signed by the approving/authorizing official, except for the following, which require advance authorization: ( a ) Use of reduced fares for group or charter arrangements;
( b ) Payment of a reduced rate of per diem for subsistence expenses;
( c ) Acceptance of payment from a non-Federal source for travel expenses; and
( d ) Travel expenses related to attendance at a conference.
#### § 60-30.7 Notice of prehearing conference.

The Administrative Law Judge shall respond to defendant's request for a hearing within 15 days and shall serve a notice of prehearing conference on the parties. The notice shall contain the time and place of the conference.
No. 11-1186.

#### Peninger *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that The Moskowitz Law Firm PLLC, counsel for plaintiffs in 

the above-entitled action, has changed its mailing address. The new address is:

The Moskowitz Law Firm, PLLC

Continental Plaza

3250 Mary Street

Suite 202

Miami, FL 33133

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 653409

Miami, FL 33175

Dated: June 1, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Howard M. Bushman

Howard M. Bushman 

Florida Bar No. 0364230

The Moskowitz Law Firm, PLLC

Continental Plaza

3250 Mary Street, Suite 202

Miami, FL 33133

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 653409

Miami, FL 33175

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 1, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, by using the 

CM/ECF system, which will serve a copy of same on all counsel of record.

 By: /s/ Howard M. Bushman

Howard M. Bushman 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2023 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
historical financial statements of American Pad & Paper Company's June 30, 1999
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000005588
<NAME>                                         AMERICAN PAD & PAPER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             494,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                       277
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (5,196)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               494,749
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           271,681
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (26,223)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                     (726)
<NET-INCOME>                                               (26,949)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.97)



</TABLE>
416P15

#### State v. Nijel Ramsey Lee

1. Def’s Pro *Se*Motion for Notice of Appeal (COAP14-357)

1. Dismissed

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition in the Alternative for *Writ of Habeas Corpus*

2. Denied 12/15/2015
EPA Conference Call with ASTSWMO December 20, 2011 Attendees: EPA OUST: Mark Barolo, L inda Gerber, Tim Smith, Paul Miller, Tim Roberts, Cho Yi Kwan ASTSWMO: Gary

Simons (MI), Lamar Bradley (TN), Mitch Scheel (OR), Jennifer Pruett (NM), Laura Fisher (CA), Rebecca Key ser (DE), Jill Hall (DE), Eric Schuller (DE), Russ Brauksieck (NY), Therron Blatter (UT), Charles Reyes (ASTSWMO), Mike Juranty (NH) On this conference call, EPA and the states d iscussed questions related to the proposed regulations, focusing on operator training, the deferrals, SPA, “continuous monitoring,” compatibility

and standards for testing.
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4398

For the relief of Lester J. Reschly.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1994

Mr. VOLKMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Lester J. Reschly.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION OF TRANSFER FOR PURPOSES

4 OF RELOCATION EXPENSES.

5 The transfer of Lester J. Reschly from Ottumwa,

6 Iowa to Columbia, Missouri in March 1992, by the Food

7 Safety and Inspection Service of the Department of Agri8 culture shall be considered to be a transfer in the interest

9 of the Government from one official duty station to an10 other for permanent duty, for the purpose of entitling Les11 ter J. Reschly to reimbursement, under sections 5724 and

12 5724a of title 5, United States Code, for the unreimbursed
2

•HR 4398 IH

1 expenses associated with the transfer and relocation of

2 Lester J. Reschly from Medford, Oregon to Ottumwa,

3 Iowa in October 1991, and from Ottumwa, Iowa to Colum4 bia, Missouri in March 1992, while employed by the Food

5 Safety and Inspection Service of the Department of Agri6 culture.

Æ
#### §§ 51-10.112-51-10.129 [Reserved]
Instructions for Obtaining a Copy of the CDs of the CASAC Teleconference s

1. The Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards will order a CD of each of the teleconference s . As soon as we get each CD we will send it to the public docket (OAR

2005

- 0172).

2 . You will be able to find the entry at www. regulations.gov. Click on advanced sear ch and you will be able to specify: Agency, docket # (OAR

- 2005

- 0172) , entry type (supporting and related materials), posting date range, and key words.

3. The titles of th e entries will be:

" Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) Teleconference on February 18, 2011. Discussion of EPA's Solicitation of CASAC Advice on the Reconsideration of the 2008 Primary Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard"

" Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committ ee (CASAC) Teleconference on March 23 , 2011. Discussion of EPA's Solicitation of CASAC Advice on the Reconsideration of the 2008 Primary Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard"
4. Click on the entry and there will be instructions on how to order a cop y of the CD by telephone, fax or email. Copies will be sent out within 10 working days.
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com]  

Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 3:40 PM

To: Andrew Delaski; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Smith; Brian Coffey; Caitlin Johnson;

Carlos Siqueiros; Caskey, John; Chad Kennedy; Chris Bolduc; Chris Brown; Creevy,

Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eduardo Robles; Edwards, Brenda; Eric Peterson;

Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Rosenquist; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry

Schoen; Jim Raba; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; Katie Coughlin; Matthew Nardotti;

Maxine Savitz; Meg Waltner; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Polinski,

Raymond; Richard W. Parker; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin

Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Ted Johnstone; Thomas

Patzner; Thomas Petrosino; Tim Ballo; Vijay Tendulkar; Wes Patterson

Subject: LV Transformer Rulemaking: Update; Sub‐Group on Data Centers

Dear Colleagues,

Hope you are well.  Just a quick update before we all leave for Thanksgiving on

status of preparations for our talks next week:

1.  I understand that the plan is to provide you with an updated packet of

engineering analysis and LCC/NIA results, using 2011 materials prices.  Shouldn't

be many surprises there, but our consultants wanted you to have the latest.

2.  Please send along any data or analysis you have on where (at what KvA

threshold) the line should be drawn for differential treatment in Design Line 7.  

On our last call there was a strong sense that 15 and

30 KvA should treated separately, but some uncertainty about whether special

treatment is required for 45 ‐ 112.5 KvA units.

3.  I spoke with Vijay Tendulkar and Irene Kennedy at Onyx about the status of

their work on crafting a data center sub‐class.  They will be forwarding to the

data center subgroup (Tom Patzner, Gary Fernstrom, Tim Ballo, Andrew DeLaski,

John Caskey, Brian Coffey) a discussion draft on that early next week with the

hope that we can have a rough draft of a specification and standard for data

centers for discussion in our plenary meeting.

Have a Happy Thanksgiving.  See you next week.

All best,

Richard Parker

Facilitator
§ 102-75.180 May landholding agencies transfer excess real property without notifying GSA? Landholding agencies may, without notifying GSA, transfer excess real property that they use, occupy, or control under a lease, permit, license, easement, or similar instrument when— ( a ) The lease or other instrument is subject to termination by the grantor or owner of the premises within nine months;
( b ) The remaining term of the lease or other instrument, including renewal rights, will provide for less than nine months of use and occupancy; or
( c ) The lease or other instrument provides for use and occupancy of space for office, storage, and related facilities, which does not exceed a total of 2,500 square feet.
§ 304-6.6 How do we determine the value of payments in kind that are to be reported on Standard Form (SF) 326? The following should be used in the determination of the value of payments in kind for reporting on SF 326: ( a ) For conference, training, or similar fees waived, discounted, or paid for by a non-Federal source on behalf of a meeting attendee, you must report the amount charged to other attendees. However, a waiver or discount of the registration fee by the non-Federal sponsor of the event for the day(s) the employee participated in the meeting or similar function as a speaker, panelist, or presenter is not a payment in kind and does not need to be reported.
( b ) For transportation or lodging, you must report the cost that the non-Federal source paid or usually would have been charged for such event.
( c ) For meals, you must use the M&IE deduction chart for CONUS and OCONUS located at *https://www.gsa.gov/mie* and report the appropriate amount for each meal based on the temporary duty locality.
( d ) For chartered, corporate or other private aircraft— ( 1 ) When common carrier is available, you must report the first-class rate that would have been charged by a commercial air carrier at the time the event took place.
( 2 ) When a common carrier is not available, you must report the cost of chartering a similar aircraft using a commercially available service.
( e ) Lodging where no commercial rate is available: You must report the maximum lodging rate established by GSA for CONUS, Department of Defense for non-foreign areas and the Secretary of State for foreign areas. These rates are available on the Internet at the GSA Web site *https://www.gsa.gov/perdiem*, with links to the non-foreign and foreign area rates.
[FTR Amdt. 2003-02, 68 FR 12604, Mar. 17, 2003, as amended at 84 FR 55249, Oct. 16, 2019; 85 FR 39850, July 2, 2020]