itt&State** C&vLress.- SamiC* CpWitt^tLec <**ii* Mv*.«iy

RELIEF OF SEVEN SOVIET PENTECOSTALS RESIDING

IN THE U.S. EMBASSY IN MOSCOW

HEAR!

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON

IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE POLICY

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY

UNITED STATES SENATE

NINETY-SEVENTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

ON

S. 312

NOVEMBER 19, 1981

Serial No. J-97-82

Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

94-078 O WASHINGTON : 1982
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY

STROM THURMOND, South Carolina, Chairman

CHARLES McC. MATHIAS, JR., Maryland JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware

PAUL LAXALT, Nevada EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts

ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia

ROBERT DOLE, Kansas HOWARD M. METZENBAUM, Ohio

ALAN K. SIMPSON, Wyoming DENNIS DECONCINI, Arizona

JOHN P. EAST, North Carolina PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont

CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa MAX BAUCUS, Montana

JEREMIAH DENTON, Alabama HOWELL HEFLIN, Alabama

ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania

VINTON DEVANE LIDE, Chief Counsel

QUENTIN CROMMEUN, Jr., Staff Director

SUBCOMMITTEE ON IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE POLICY

ALAN K. SIMPSON, Wyoming, Chairman

STROM THURMOND, South Carolina EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts

CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa DENNIS DECONCINI, Arizona

RICHARD W. DAY, Chief Counsel and Staff Director

DONNA M. ALVARADO, Counsel

CHARLES O. WOOD, Counsel

ARNOLD H. LEIBOWITZ, Special Counsel

(U)

.-i r-?/_
CONTENTS

STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Page

Simpson, Hon. Alan K., a U.S. Senator from the State of Wyoming, chairman,

Subcommittee on Immigration and Refugee Policy 1

Grassley, Hon. Charles E., a U.S. Senator from the State of Iowa 148

Prepared statement 154

PROPOSED LEGISLATION

S. 312•For the relief of Maria and Timofei Chmykhalov, and for Lilia, Peter,

Liubov, Lidia, and Augustina Vashchenko 3

CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF WITNESSES

Simons, Thomas W., Jr., Director, Office of Soviet Union Affairs, Department

of State 5

Meissner, Doris M., Acting Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization

Service, Department of Justice 13

Levin, Hon. Carl, a U.S. Senator from the State of Michigan 19

Jepsen, Hon. Roger W., a U.S. Senator from the State of Iowa 27

Drake, Jane, secretary, Society of Americans for Vashchenko Emigration and

Chmykholovs Families Persecution and Emigration of Vashchenkos Since

1962 : 33

Hruby, Rev. and Mrs. Blahoslav S., executive director and editor, Research

Center for Religion and Human Rights in Closed Societies 127

Hill, Kent R., assistant professor of history, Seattle Pacific University 136

ALPHABETICAL LISTING AND MATERIALS SUBMITTED

Drake, Jane:

Testimony 33

Prepared statement 36

Embassy Inmates Endure Daily Abuse, by Congressman Richard Shelby,

Selma Times-Journal, May 1979 40

Letter to Ambassador Heartman, American Embassy, Moscow, from the

Vashchenko family, November 5, 1981 41

Letter from Cecil Williamson, Minister Eresent Hill Presbyterian

Church, to Yevgeniy S. Antiptov, Counselor and Consul, Embassy of the

U.S.S.R. with a responding letter 42

Invitations of emigration for all 16 members of the Peter Vashchenko

family 44

Information sheet: Procedures for obtaining exit documentation from the

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 124

Letter from the Vashchenko family to the SAVE organization 129

Hill, Dr. Kent R.:

Testimony 136

Prepared statement 139

After Three Long Years: Glimmers of Movement in "Siberian Seven"

Impasse, from Christianity Today, 1981 142

Hruby, Rev. and Mrs. Blahoslav S.:

Testimony 127

Prepared statement 132

Letter drafted by the Embassy in Russian and English 151

HID

S<
IV

Jepsen, Hon. Roger W.: Pa«

e

Testimony 27

Prepared statement 30

Levin, Hon. Carl:

Testimony 19

Prepared statement _ 23

Meissner, Doris M.:

Testimony 13

Prepared statement 14

Simons, Thomas W.:

Testimony 5

Prepared statement 9

APPENDIX

Prepared statement of Dr. Ernest Gordon, president, CREED (Christian

Rescue Effort for the Emancipation of Dissidents) 157
FOR THE RELIEF OF SEVEN SOVIET PENTECOSTALS RESIDING IN THE U.S. EMBASSY IN

MOSCOW

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1981

U.S. SENATE,

SUBCOMMITTEE ON IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE POLICY,

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY,

Washington, D.C.

The subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 10:05 a.m., in room

357, the Capitol, Hon. Alan K. Simpson (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding.

Present: Senator Simpson.

OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. ALAN K. SIMPSON, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF WYOMING, CHAIRMAN, SUBCOMMITTEE ON IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE POLICY

Senator SIMPSON. On June 27, 1978, nearly 3V2 years ago, seven

members of the Vashchenko family and the Chmykhalov family

from Siberia entered the U.S. Embassy in Moscow. When these

seven received word that an eighth member of their group, John

Vashchenko who was stopped by the Soviets at the Embassy entrance had been beaten, they asked the U.S. Embassy for asylum,

and they have remained in the Embassy to this day.

Despite efforts of the State Department, despite an outpouring of

concern from the United States and around the world, and despite

the provisions of the Helsinki accords, which the Soviets have

signed, the Soviet Government has not agreed to allow the "Siberian Seven" to emigrate from Russia.

Senate bill 312 has been introduced by Senator Levin and many

cosponsors in the Senate, a bill which would grant permanent resident alien status to the seven members Vashchenko and Chmykhalov families living in the Embassy, and which bill would further

provide that the seven would be considered to be physically present

and residing in the United States since June 27, 1978, the day they

entered the Embassy compound.

The measure has been introduced to achieve the goal of the emigration of the "Siberian Seven" from the Soviet Union. In my capacity as chairman of the Subcommittee on Immigration and Refugee Policy, and at various requests from the cosponsors and from

persons throughout the country, it was determined to hold a hearing to see where we are on this issue.

In the hearing this morning, we shall hear testimony concerning

the effectiveness or the hoped effectiveness of Senate bill 312 in

(1)
achieving that goal, and whether it is in the best interest of these

persons and this country that this take place.

Hopefully, we will have a balanced presentation of that, and try

to hear what is really best in this unavoidably highly emotional

type of situation, but I have found that there are few who are unemotional in immigration and refugee policy matters.

[Text of S. 312 follows:]
II

97TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S.312

For the relief of Maria and Timofei Chmykhalov, and for Lilia, Peter, Liubov,

Lidia, and Augustina Vashchenko.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUABY 29 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1981

Mr. LEVIN (for himself, Mr. BOBBN, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr. JEPSEN, Mr. BUMPERS,

Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. ARMSTRONG, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. BIDEN,

Mr. BOSCHWITZ, Mr. BUBDICK, Mr. CANNON, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. COHEN,

Mr. CBANSTON, Mr. DANFORTH, Mr. DECONCINI, Mr. DENTON, Mr. DODD,

Mr. DURENBEBGER, Mr. EAGLETON, Mr. GABN, Mr. GOLDWATEB, Mr.

GORTON, Mr. HAYAKAWA, Mr. HEFLIN, Mr. HEINZ, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

HOLLINGS, Mr. HUDDLESTON, Mr. HUMPHBEY, Mr. INOUYE, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. KASTEN, Mr. LUGAB, Mr. MATHIAS, Mr. MATSUNAGA, Mr.

MATTINGLY, Mr. MCCLUBE, Mr. MELCHEB, Mr. METZENBAUM, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. PEESSLER, Mr. PROXMIRE, Mr. PRYOB, Mr.

RANDOLPH, Mr. RIEGLE, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SOHMITT, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr.

STEVENS, Mr. TSONGAS, and Mr. WILLIAMS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Maria and Timofei Chmykhalov, and for Lilia,

Peter, Liubov, Lidia, and Augustina Vashchenko.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. The Congress finds that•

•(Star Print) ,
2

1 (1) since 1962, thirteen members of the Vash2 chenko family and eleven members of the Chmykhalov

3 family from Chernogorsk, Siberia have requested that

4 they be released from Soviet citizenship and be permit5 ted to receive exit visas so that they may leave the

6 Union of Soviet Socialist Republics legally and in ac7 cordance with the Universal Declaration of Human

8 Rights; and

9 (2) since June 27, 1978, seven members of the

10 Vashchenko and Chmykhalov families have resided in

11 the United States Embassy in Moscow and have been

12 living in accordance with United States laws.

13 SEC. 2. Notwithstanding any numerical limitations or

14 any other provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act,

15 for purposes of such Act, Maria and Timofei Chmykhalov,

16 and Lilia, Peter, Liubov, Lidia, and Augustina Vashchenko

17 shall be issued visas and admitted to the United States for

18 permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of this

19 Act upon payment of the required visa fees. Upon the grant20 ing of permanent residence to such aliens as provided for in

21 this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper offi22 cer to reduce by the required number during the current

23 fiscal year or the fiscal year next following, the total number

24 of immigrant visas and conditional entries which are made

25 available to natives of the country of the aliens' birth under
3

1 paragraphs (1) through (8) of section 203(a) of such Act, or if

2 applicable, the total number of immigrant visas and condi3 tional entries which are made available to natives of the

4 country of the aliens' birth under section 202 of such Act.

5 SEC. 3. Notwithstanding section 316 of the Immigration

6 and Nationality Act or any other provision of law, for pur7 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Maria and Ti8 mofei Chymkhalov, and Lilia, Peter, Liubov, Lidia, and Au9 gustina Vashchenko shall be held and considered to have

10 been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent

11 residence as of June 27, 1978, and to have been physically

12 present and residing therein continuously since such date.

Senator SIMPSON. SO we will proceed with the agenda, and the

witnesses. First we have a panel of Thomas Simons, Director of the

Office of Soviet Union Affairs of the Department of State, and

Doris Meissner, the Acting Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization Service of the Department of Justice. Later we will

have the remarks of Senator Carl Levin, and Senator Roger

Jepsen.

So if you would please proceed.

STATEMENT OF THOMAS W. SIMONS, JR., DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF

SOVIET UNION AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Mr. SIMONS. Mr. Chairman, thank you.

It is a pleasure to be here, and to give some views for the State

Department on this bill. It is a bill whose intention the administration applauds.

I am here. Assistant Secretary Eagleburger would have liked to

have been here, but as you know he is in Europe following up on

the President's speech yesterday and, therefore, asked me to fill in

for him at this hearing on an issue which is important to us, and

with which we are in full sympathy.

You have my testimony. I would just like to briefly summarize

some of the main points of it.

Once again there can be no question of support. We do support

the intention of the bill. The families are close to us. I have not
6

served in Moscow since they were in the Embassy, but my colleagues here have.

We know them as heroic people, even saintly people who are

bearing the burdens of an emotional situation with heroic fortitude, and we share with them the goal of having them leave the

Soviet TJnion to live in a community of their choice where they feel

they can exercise their beliefs and live together as families freely

in a way that they cannot do in the Soviet Union, and in a way

that they cannot do in the Embassy compound.

The problems that we have with the bill all concern the question

of effectiveness. We are obliged to look at the effect of a bill like

this, an American law, on the actual real world prospects of the

families leaving the Embassy. I must say, I will say it here and it is

in the testimony, that to the best of our judgment the effects of

passage of this bill into law would be genuinely mixed.

On the one hand, it is certainly true that an expression of public

support from the Senate, from the Congress of the United States

for the plight of these families would have some beneficial effect. It

would help their morale.

They are sorely tried. They are sustained by their faith in God,

by their prayers, by their own solidarity, their feeling of solidarity

within the Embassy and with their families in Chernogorsk. This

bill would be an additional sustenance to them in the trial that

they are now undergoing.

It also helps, in our experience, to have expressions of concern

from the American public, from the American Congress, from the

administration for their goal, the common objective of allowing

them to leave the Soviet Union together.

Those two factors are positive factors about the bill. The difficulty arises for the State Department and the administration with

other likely consequences of the bill, which I don't think the committee can ignore.

If only the first factors pertained, there would be no question of

administration support for the bill, but there are these other factors, which I would like you to take into account.

First of all, the bill as written, providing legislation of physical

presence in the United States for these people during their stay in

the Embassy compound will be construed, we are confident, by the

Soviet authorities as an exercise of U.S. legislative jurisdiction in

Soviet territory.

The bill, as written, states that the people are living in the Embassy in accordance with U.S. law. It will be impossible for the

Soviet authorities to consider that this is true. They are living in

the Embassy compound in accordance with Soviet law, and a bill

providing that they are physically present in the United States will

be seen an extension of American jurisdiction into Soviet territory.

This will be unwelcome to them for a number of reasons. They

will have, we think, problems of principle with it. I think the U.S.

Government would have the same problems of principle over an extension of Soviet law into American territory. But there are also

practical consequences that the Soviets will see with an intention

of having these families emigrate direct from refuge in a foreign

embassy out of the country.
The practical consequences, and I know from reading Senator

Levin's testimony that it is not the intention to create a precedent

with this law, but the effect from the Soviet point of view would

indeed be to set a precedent. They cannot avoid the spectre, I

think, of very many people being heartened by a precedent, and sitting in foreign embassies until they are allowed directly out of the

country.

This is one problem having to do with the attitude of the Soviet

authorities who control the decision to release the Vashchenkos

and Chmykhalovs.

I think it is reasonable and rational to fear that the Soviet authorities will be obliged to demonstrate that they will not be subjected to pressure of this kind, an extension of U.S. legislation to

their territory, and this would make them even more unwilling to

envisage the kind of creative solutions we would like them to come

up with for dealing with an admittedly complex problem.

Second, with regard to documentation, Ms. Meissner will speak

to that, but it is currently possible to document members of either

or both families for entry into the United States at this time. The

bill would neither add nor subtract from that current situation. We

can let them in as soon as the Soviets decide to release them.

Third, the question of physically present and residing in the

United States carries with it, we fear, the implication that we have

a concept of extraterritoriality for diplomatic missions in foreign

countries. In fact, the United States does not accept

extraterritoriality of diplomatic missions, nor as far as we are

aware does any other country in the world.

It is, therefore, without legal foundation either for us or in this

case for the Soviets, and once again we feel it would probably have

a negative effect on the essential question, the willingness to release these people.

With regard to the question of physical presence, we would suggest that this could be taken care of by a revision of the text of the

bill, which would provide that the time that the families have

spent in the compound would be deducted from the time required

for them to be naturalized once they had arrived in the United

States. But this is something, depending on the committee's decision and deliberation, which can be discussed later between our

two branches.

I would like to conclude, Mr. Chairman, by saying once again

that we support the intention of the bill. President Reagan has

been eloquent himself on this question, as Senator Levin pointed

out in his previous testimony. He strongly supports their quest to

emigrate from the Soviet Union.

We will continue to do everything possible to convince the Soviets, to encourage the Soviets to come up with solutions which they

feel are acceptable to them. We have been in continuous touch

with them. We continue to invite them to be creative with regard

to the problem. They know, it is crystal clear to them that resolution of this problem will have a favorable effect on bilateral relations with the United States.

We have made it clear to the families, and the Soviets also know

it, that they are free to remain in the refuge of the Embassy as
8

long as necessary, until there is a resolution, and that we will try

to make their lives there as comfortable as possible.

We applaud the generous, humanitarian concern shown by this

bill. If we believed the bill could help on balance, because there are

certain good things in it, achieve the common goal of getting them

out, we would certainly support it, because the old Polish national

slogan "For your freedom and ours" has no more vivid exemplar

than the case of the Vashchenko and the Chmykhalov families.

At this point, we feel the balance in terms of effectiveness, the

essential criterion of effectiveness is unfavorable.

We would like to work with the committee. We could conceive of

a different kind of bill which makes absolutely clear the support of

the Congress and of the American people for these families, for

their plight, but whose operative portions perhaps, in terms of U.S.

law, would center on the question of physical residency, and would

be reconfigured to avoid the extraterritoriality implication in the

present bill, and would refer only to what would happen to the

families once they arrive in the United States, if they decided to

request citizenship.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

[Prepared statement of Mr. Simons follows:]
PREPARED STATEMENT OF THOMAS W. SIMONS, JR.

Mr. Chairman:

I an pleased to have this opportunity to present the Department of State's views on Senate Bill 312. which would grant

permanent? resident alien status to those members of the

Vashchenko and Chmykhalov families presently living in refuge

in the American Embassy in Moscow.

The U.S. Government continues vigorously to seek the

emigration of these two families, and their right, under the

Helsinki accords, to seek freedom of religious expression and

freedom of movement. The welfare and ultimate fate of the

families is of deep professional and personal concern to the

staff of our Embassy in Moscow and to this Administration. The

State Department is firmly committed to helping the Vashchenkos

and Chmykhalovs achieve their goal of emigrating from the

Soviet Union and supports all reasonable initiatives that

contribute to this end.

There are five members of the Vashchenko family now living

in the Embassy - the father and mother and three of their

daughters. Still another 10 children of the family live in the

family's hometown of Chernogorsk in Siberia. There are also

two members of the Chmykhalov family in the Embassy, the mother

and her son. There are nine other members of the Chmykhalov

family living in Chernogorsk.

As you know, this is a complex case. The Soviet Government

has continued to insist that the question of the families'

emigration will not be addressed until they return to their

home in Chernogorsk and, with the rest of their families, apply

to local administrative organs in compliance with Soviet law.

The family members now living in the Embassy, quite understandablyo refuse to leave the safety of the Embassy without

the assurances of the Soviet Government that they will be

permitted to emigrate.

Despite the diametrically opposed points of view held by

the Soviet Government and the two families, we hope that in
10

tine a solution can be found, although it appears that in the

near tern chances for such a solution are remote. You may be

sure that every conceivable step which might lead to a solution

receives our sympathetic consideration.

It is clear that the overall purpose of United States'

actions in this case should and must be to obtain the release

from the Soviet Union of the members of the Chmykhalov and

Vashchenko families. The criterion must be effectiveness:

whether or not a proposed step is likely to help or hinder their

release. In the context of our present relations, we feel that

it is not in our or the families' best interest to undertake

measures which may prejudice • perhaps forever • the already

slender chances of the family members to gain permission to

emigrate from the Soviet Union.

Thus, we believe that there are several aspects of this

bill which should be examined carefully before a decision on it

is rendered by Congress. Judged against the criterion of potential effectiveness, these aspects are genuinely mixed.

On the one hand, it is certainly true that the passage of

S-312 could help raise the morale of the Pentecostal families

and demonstrate in a concrete manner our concern for their fate.

This is effi important consideration. Raising the morale of these

sorely tried people and registering American concern are useful

aims.

At the same time, it is equally important to avoid steps

which could, on balance, damage these families' already slim

prospects for emigration. In our judgement there is reason to

believe that this bill, if passed, will on balance have that

effect. We must consider three factors.

First, Soviet practice in these and other cases strongly

suggests that the Soviet Government resists and will continue

to resist setting a precedent for allowing direct emigration of

Soviet citizens from refuge in a foreign embassy. There is

probably a basis for this position in Soviet law, but the
11

practical consequences alone would almost certainly give the

Soviet authorities pause.

Second, it is presently possible, under the terns of the

Immigration and Nationality Act and the Refugee Act of 1980, to

document members of either or both families for entry into the

United States. The proposed legislation is not required to

accomplish this purpose. Passage of the legislation might in

fact have an adverse effect on the principal objective, that

is, the issuance of exit visas by the Soviet authorities.

Again without being privy to all the reasons the Soviets may

give themselves, I would like to suggest some of them.

The Soviet authorities would construe this bill as an

exercise of U.S. legislative jurisdiction with respect to

citizens of the Soviet Union residing within that country and

thus interference in its internal affairs. They would not see

it as a well-intended humanitarian act. Rather, they would see

it as an attempt to extend U.S. law to Soviet territory. The

reaction would almost certainly be highly negative, particularly

if the bill received much publicity.

If they follow past practice, the Soviet authorities would

be motivated to demonstrate to the Soviet citizenry and to the

international community that the U.S. Government cannot

unilaterally accord Soviet citizens some form of special status

or protection under U.S. law. Such a demonstration would make

it more rather than less difficult for them to envisage

creative solutions to a complex problem.

Third, in our judgement section 3 of the proposed act,

which provides that the Pentecostals will be considered to be

physically present and residing in the United States since June

27, 1978, when they entered the Embassy compound is also likely

on balance to hurt rather than help these families' prospects

for emigration. By equating the time spent in the Embassy

compound with time spent in the United States, the bill

suggests reliance on the concept of extra-territoriality of
12

diplomatic missions • a concept without legal foundation and

rejected by the United States and the international community.

Mr. Chairman, the people this bill seeks to assist are in a

specific»rreal-life situation. In reality, the United States

cannot, by unilaterally declaring these individuals to be

"permanent residents" of the United States, alter the fact that

they remain Soviet citizens, present in Soviet territory and

fully subject to Soviet law. In this respect, the case of the

Pentecostal families differs from those of other prominent

human rights cases, such as the Skuodis, Stolar, and Kudirka

cases, where there were and are strong prior claims to U.S.

citizenship. We cannot, under general principles of

international law or under any relevant international

agreement, compel the Soviet Union to recognize any change in

their status or to issue the requisite exit visas to permit

their emigration to the United States.

With regard to this third consideration involving physical

presence, the problem we see could largely be avoided if the

bill were modified to provide for a shortening of the physical

residency requirement, only after the Pentecostals have

actually entered the United States and applied for

naturalization. The amount of time to be deducted from the

residency requirement would be equal to the time the

Pentecostals spent in the Embassy compound. This approach is

not without precedent, and would not imply the assertion of

some "extra-territorial" principle.
13

Let me close by reaffirming the Department of State's

commitmeift to the quest of the Vashchenko and Chmykhalov

families to emigrate from the Soviet Union. We have done and

will continue to do all possible to assist them in this cause.

We have been in continuous touch with the Soviet authorities

about these families since they sought refuge in our Embassy.

We continue to invite the Soviets to discuss new ways to

resolve what we recognize is an extraordinarily complex

problem. They know that resolution would have a favorable

effect on bilateral relations with the United States. Until a

successful resolution can be found, we have made it clear to

the families that they are free to remain in refuge in the

Embassy, and we will try to make their lives there as

comfortable as possible. We recognize that S-312 is motivated

by a generous humanitarian concern for these families. If we

believed it would help achieve our common goal • resettlement

in the community of their choice • the bill would have our

full support. Unfortunately, we believe that on balance it

would hurt rather than help.

Senator SIMPSON. Thank you very much, Mr. Simons, that is very

helpful.

Now please, Doris Meissner.

STATEMENT OF DORIS M. MEISSNER, ACTING COMMISSIONER,

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE

Ms. MEISSNER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

We, too, have a statement which we would like to enter into the

record with your permission.

Senator SIMPSON. Without objection.

Ms. MEISSNER. I will summarize briefly by saying that the Justice Department also views the plight of these individuals with

great sympathy. The State Department has capsulized the views of

the administration very effectively, and we defer to them on this

issue as the principal spokesperson for the Administration.

Thank you.

[Prepared statement of Ms. Meissner follows:]
14

PREPARED STATEMENT OF DORIS M, MEISSNER

Mr. Chairman, and members of the Subcommittee:

I am pleased to be here today to discuss the views of the Department of

Justice on S. 312, for the relief of Maria and Timofei Chmykhalov, and

for Lilia, Peter, Liubov, Lidia, and Augustina Vashchenko.

This bill grants permanent resident status to seven Russian

Pentecostalist Christians who have sought shelter in the U.S. Embassy

in Moscow on June, 1978, and who have been residing there since that

date.

According to information obtained from Olsa Hruby of the Research

Center for Religion and Human Rights, which focuses on the circumstances of individuals in closed societies, and from Mr. and Mrs. Arlo

Blumhagen, both the Chmykhalov and Vaschenko families were at the

Embassy on June 27, 1978 in an attempt to secure immigrant visas to the

United States. Prior to their entry onto embassy grounds the Soviet

police arrested John Vaschenko. The others were able to get into the

compound and have not left there since that date. The beneficiaries

have attempted to receive exit visas to leave Russia since 1962.

However, due to their religious beliefs as Christians, the Russian

government refuses to allow them to leave. The beneficiaries are

members of a fundamentalist Christian sect known as the

Pentacostalists, whose particular way of practicing their religion in

accordance with the dictates of their conscience has brought them into

severe conflict with the law. They refused to register their religious

congregation because they claim the conditions of registration violates

their religious principles. The Chmykhalovs also refused to carry

Soviet passports claiming that, as Christians, they are citizens of the

Kingdom of God. Refusal to carry a Soviet passport as a means of

identity is a crime under Soviet law and carries penalties ranging from

a petty fine to imprisonment in a labor camp. During the last 20
15

years, the adult beneficiaries have been subjected to arrests and

confinement for various amounts of time as a direct result of their

religious practices. The beneficiaries seek to emigrate to the United

States on grounds that they are unable to practice their religion

freely in the Soviet Onion. They insist that they will not leave the

Embassy until the rest of their family are allowed to join them and

they all are permitted t leave the Soviet Onion.

Onder the bill, the Chmykhalvos and Vashchenkos would be considered

lawful permanent residents of the O.S. and continuously present in the

Onited States as of June 27, 1978, the date they entered the Embassy.

They would thus be eligible for citizenship five years from that date.

The Reverend Cecil Williamson of Selma, Alabama, has volunteered to

sponsor the Vashchenkos family. Mr. and Mrs. Arlo Blumhagen of Drake,

North Dakota, have volunteered to sponsor the Chmykhalov family.

The Department of Justice views the plight of the Chmykhalvos and

Vashchenkos with great sympathy and hopes for a satisfactory outcome.

Obviously, the grant of seven permanent resident visas would have no

impact on the Immigration and Naturalization Service. However, we

defer to the Department of State as to whether S. 312 should be

enacted. We believe that the Department of State can best determine

the effect of S. 312, in view of the international scope of the

situation and the fact that the families have taken refuge within a

diplomatic mission of the Onited States.
16

Senator SIMPSON. That was very succinct.

I want to thank you for your participation here today, and also

your great interest in participation in the various hearings that we

have held in the recent days and months with regard to the entire

picture of immigration and refugee policy in the United States.

I have some questions. Can you tell us, Mr. Simons, what the

State Department is presently doing to obtain the safe release of

the two families from the Embassy, and what they are doing to attempt to assure their free immigration from the Soviet Union.

What are some of the typical things that are being done?

Mr. SIMONS. Mr. Chairman, the State Department continues to

make clear to the Soviets at all levels, including very high levels,

the specific interest of the administration in the emigration of

these families. I am reluctant to go into the details of governmentto-government communications in this forum. If the committee

wishes, we would be happy to give details in closed session on this.

But the Soviets are in no doubt at the highest levels of our interest

in this.

Ambassador Kampelman, the chief of our delegation at the Conference on European Security, the review conference in Madrid,

has also made clear the U.S. Government interest and is in contact

with his Soviet counterpart about the case.

I think it would be hard for me to go further with regard to the

details of the encouragement.

Senator SIMPSON. Within the limits of what is confidential or

classified, what are some of the other diplomatic initiatives which

are being considered which would facilitate the issuance of an exit

permit or an exit visa to these people.

Mr. SIMONS. Diplomatic initiatives consist in encouragement of

the Soviets to discover and discuss with us ways within the confines of their system and their views on this, to come up with a

solution.

The Vashchenkos themselves, I think, although I haven't read

the text, I understand wrote to Ambassador Hartman, our new

Ambassador in Moscow, recently mentioning one variant of the

many things that have been considered in the past, which would be

to allow the members of the family who are now in Chernogorsk to

depart, and then to go back to the members of the Embassy compound, to discover whether this would be the kind of assurance

that they might need to go back to Chernogorsk and apply with the

local emigration authorities as the Soviets insist that they must

under Soviet law.

This would be an example of the kind of creativity that we would

welcome from the Soviets.

Senator SIMPSON. IS it your testimony, as I perceive it, that if

this measure were to pass that it might actually reduce the

chances of the so called "Siberian Seven" to emigrate from the

Soviet Union?

Mr. SIMONS. Since it is a judgment of the reaction of the Soviet

authorities, and we do not live inside their heads, it is hard to give

a clear and confident judgment.

Certainly, in some ways it would help, in the sense of bringing to

their attention the widespread public support and the Government

support for the release of the families, and it would boost their own
17

morale. But, as I said, are there these other factors which I have

mentioned, so our judgment is that on balance it would hurt rather

than help.

Senator SIMPSON. I might ask Doris Meissner, do you feel that

the passage of this bill would set a precedent with adverse consequences for the United States. If, so, what do you perceive to be the

ways in which that would be adverse?

Ms. MEISSNER. We have not done a thorough review of whether

or not there is any precedent for such an action, but we believe at

the present time there is no precedent.

As was stated earlier in the State Department's testimony, the

intent of this bill is that it not be a precedent-setting action, but

that is very difficult to avoid.

I am sure that the language of the bill could be couched in

unique terms, although it is very difficult for us to know how that

might be used in the future in similar circumstances. I do think, as

was stated earlier, that it would be difficult for the bill not to

become precedent-setting at one level or another.

Senator SIMPSON. YOU have had long experience in our Federal

Government in these areas, and it is interesting to me to hear your

comments about precedent. Have we ever actually dealt, to your

knowledge, with legislation granting permanent resident status•

that is not a change of status, but a new status when there is no

status at all to begin with•to foreign nationals who seek refuge in

our embassies abroad, and can you cite previous instances, if you

recall them, of long delays where persons have been living in or

involved with an Embassy, yet have not actually left the confines

of that facility?

Ms. MEISSNER. Not to my knowledge. As I said, we would be

pleased to do some research on that. To our knowledge, we don't

know of similar circumstances. We have had circumstances where

people have taken refuge in our Embassies, or we have granted refugee status to people within their own countries and then brought

them to the United States. But lawful permanent residence is not

anything we have dealt with in the past.

Senator SIMPSON. Realizing the constraints upon confidentiality

and classification, but are you able to refer to us any new or different avenues, or initiatives which might be explored in order to find

a humanitarian solution to this vexatious problem?

Ms. MEISSNER. There is always, of course, the Attorney General's

parole authority. That is a very flexible section in the law which

can be used in a very discretionary fashion. But the basic problem

remains whether or not the Soviet authorities choose to allow these

people to emigrate, and that is the fundamental issue on which the

discussion continues to turn.

It is not clear to me that the use of the parole authority, even

though it certainly would be within the confines of American law,

in any way overcomes the emigration problem.

Senator SIMPSON. Has such a request as we are making upon the

Soviet Union in this situation, not a request, but if we would implement a law, has this ever been demanded or requested of the

United States?

Ms. MEISSNER. Not to my knowledge.

Senator SIMPSON. Are you aware of that, Mr. Simons?
18

Mr. SIMONS. I am not aware of any, Mr. Chairman.

Senator SIMPSON. Just a final question.

You stated, Mr. Simons, clearly so, I think, that these people

were "free to remain there." How long will that feeling persist

under the conditions in which they are living now?

Mr. SIMONS. Mr. Chairman, I am confident that it will persist as

long as the problem persists and has not been brought to the rapid

solution that we would like it to take.

There is no question that they are welcome in the Embassy, and

can have refuge until the Soviets agree to release them.

Senator SIMPSON. I think there has been a previous fear that has

given rise to the interest of us in the Congress that they would be

turned out of the Embassy, and that was more than just conjecture,

there was even some commentary at one time about that and, of

course, that causes great concern.

Mr. SIMONS. I am new to this job, since August, but I can't imagine that happening.

Senator SIMPSON. I know that one of the things that is of concern

from a legal standpoint is family reunification, which would be

something that we would ordinarily be considering. Yet there are

no immediate relatives of these families here to give rise to the

real mission of any emigration policy, and that is family reunification. That is a difficult part of it, too.

Mr. SIMONS. It is also a difficulty on the Soviet side, Mr. Chairman, because as I understand Soviet practice, I cannot speak to

Soviet law, the main ground for emigration which is recognized by

the Soviet authorities is family reunification, which of course does

not pertain in this case.

Senator SIMPSON. Let me just add one other dimension to the

thorniness of it all.

I am aware that we are now erecting a new embassy in the

Soviet Union. What will we do with these people when that embassy has been completed. Will not there be a requirement to seek the

approval of the Soviet Union in moving those people to the new

embassy compound? Where are we with that?

Mr. SIMONS. The embassy is very unlikely to be completed before

2V2 or 3 years. We would certainly like the problem to be resolved

well before then. I am not sure that it would be very helpful for me

to speculate on what would happen when the embassy is completed, but I can say that the U.S. Government has no intention of

abandoning these families.

Senator SIMPSON. I thank you both.

I am going to visit with the sponsor, Senator Levin, and with the

cosponsors, to examine the prospect of a closed session so that we

might review present initiatives, things that are actually being

done through diplomatic and other channels which would facilitate

the free emigration and the exit visa.

I think we will arrange that, since I see that you both feel limited and justifiably so, and that is what executive session efforts and

closed sessions, even though they are rather repugnant to me in

most cases, are for. Obviously, if you can go no further here, then

obviously we must pursue that, I think, at some other convenient

time.
19

I thank you both very much for your testimony. It was very helpful.

Now, if I may, I would like to present Senator Carl Levin of

Michigan, who I have come to know as a colleague and companion

here in the U.S. Senate, and a man who deeply believes in the

things that he espouses, and certainly this has been a most extraordinarily vigorous pursuit by him in an issue which is repugnant to

him in its present form. He feels deeply about the necessity to proceed and do something appropriate, and I understand that drive

very much.

I welcome you to the subcommittee, and we appreciate having

your comments, Senator Levin.

STATEMENT OF HON. CARL LEVIN, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE

STATE OF MICHIGAN

Senator LEVIN. Senator Simpson, thank you very much for what

you are doing, and for calling these hearings. I know that you

share the same goal that I and the other cosponsors, and I hope

every Member of the Senate have deep in our hearts.

Traditionally testimony of this kind, Mr. Chairman, begins with

a series of thank yous directed at the committee, at my cosponsors•including Senators Jepsen and Boren who have done so much

to keep this matter moving forward•and 62 other Senators, and

those members of the public who have devoted themselves to freedom of the Chmykhalovs and the Vashchenkos.

While I have a sincere appreciation for the efforts that you have

made, and the extraordinary efforts and devotion of those in this

room, and thousands who can't be here, because the situation we

address today is unique, I think I will break with the traditional

introductory remarks.

I am afraid that the plight of the Vashchenkos and Chmykhalovs, and the fact that the State Department is continuously unwilling to initiate or support meaningful efforts to ameliorate it,

also breaks with tradition, in this case, the traditional American

love of freedom and the traditional American commitment to help

the oppressed and the persecuted.

The committee is familiar with the facts surrounding this case.

You know that for the past 3% years, these two families, these

seven people, have lived in a small room in the U.S. Embassy in

Moscow. You know what happened to some of the rest of the members of their family who tried to enter the Embassy with them, and

the treatment by the Soviets of those members.

You know that when these seven entered the Embassy on June

27, 1978, they were driven by a desire for freedom and not by any

conscious plan to seek asylum. They had been seeking freedom,

seeking to leave Russia since 1961.

You know that forces beyond their control, but forces directly

under the control of the Soviet Union, created a situation which

precluded them from leaving. So there they sit in that single small

room, and hope that somehow someone will come to their aid.

Normally, one might suspect that that someone would be the

Government of the United States. But, in this case, that suspicion
20

regrettably is wrong, as wrong as the policy the Government has

adopted to deal with these families has been.

For 3V2 years, our State Department has resisted efforts to improve the lot of these families. Initially, the State Department refused to protest the Soviet decision to restrict mail deliveries to the

families. State has long refused to allow the families to engage in

meaningful work within the Embassy compound. State refused to

allow members of the press to interview members of the family

unless the interviews were conducted outdoors, and on and on.

It wasn't until individual Members of this Congress and hundreds of private citizens became involved in this matter, and started to pressure the State Department that arrangements were

gradually made, which made life a little more tolerable for the individuals involved.

Throughout that entire pressure process, State resisted. At every

step they claimed that concessions in any of these areas would violate policy or make the ultimate release of these people more difficult to secure.

Well, some of our policies were changed little by little because of

pressure, and the cautious don't shake the boat world of the State

Department has not collapsed. And, while their release is no closer,

it is certainly no further away because of these efforts, Mr. Chairman.

The State Department has made much of the kindness and consideration extended to the members of the families by individuals

assigned to the Embassy, as well they should. As individuals, many

members of our diplomatic mission have been extraordinarily

humane. But as a diplomatic mission, we have been terribly inhumane and uncaring when faced with the reality of what these individual members of the Vashchenko and Chmykhalov families have

had to endure.

As one who, with Senator Boren, visited those families, I know

we were struck by the hardships they have endured and the hardships they are still willing to endure in an effort to secure their

freedom. But those hardships have not adequately impressed our

State Department.

It seems at times as if they view these families as a hardship

that the State Department must endure. They view them as an embarrassment to our Government rather than trying to embarrass

and, yes, shame the Soviet Government into releasing them.

Their testimony this morning is typical of that approach. It is

full of concern, but not of compassion. It if full of doubts, but not

desire. It is full of detailed objections, but short of determination to

see these people free.

Just take a look at the testimony. It speaks in ringing tones of

their desire to see the quest for the right to emigrate affirmed. It

promises that they will continue to explore new ways to resolve an

extraordinarily complex problem. What are those new ways? They

don't tell us. Are they the ways which have resulted in the emigration of only 10 Pentecostal families from the Soviet Union when

over 30,000 members of that faith have made application? What

has the State Department to offer?

I fear that one of the things they may offer us is an approach

first tried in 1978 by then Ambassador Toon, requesting the fami-
21

lies to return to Chernogorsk and, in return, promising a hollow

gesture, that our Government will seek to secure Russian promises

of their safety and Russian pledges to allow their emigration.

In fact, I am informed, Mr. Chairman, that Ambassador Hartman has, like Ambassador Toon, sought to strike just such a socalled bargain with the Vashchenkos and the Chmykhalovs.

Even if these two families agreed to such an arrangement, something I would not recommend and something which I am told they

have rejected, what kind of faith can we place in that Soviet

pledge? They pledge at Helsinki to allow freedom of worship and

travel, and the Russian treatment of the Vashchenkos and the

Chmykhalovs represents the culmination of that Russian pledge.

They pledged to free Isaac Elkowitz, a 13-year-old who took

refuge in our Embassy after his parents were killed at the close of

World War II, and when he decided to accept that pledge 5 years

later, he left the Embassy and, as far as we know, left the world.

We have not heard from him or of him for nearly 30 years. Broken

Russian pledges are strewn across the Gulag, and break the hearts

of the victims and their loved ones.

Representatives of the State Department have told my staff that

they would not object to this bill if it was simply redrafted to be a

sense of the Congress resolution. They don't object to the concept,

just to the teeth, the legal force of this legislation. But it is precisely the legal force that is important in two ways.

First, it guarantees that these families can stay in the Embassy.

Given the kinds of pressure the State Department has exerted on

them in the past, I think that would be a significant accomplishment even if that was all this bill did. But I believe it does more

than that, because second, it indicates to the Soviets just how seriously we take this issue.

None of the technical legal concerns expressed by the State Department are insurmountable. If the Soviets felt pressured by

meaningful American actions, they could surmount them. I am

more than willing to redraft this legislation with State's suggestion

to make the permanent residency grant effective as of now rather

than as of the date of their entry into the Embassy.

In fact, I am more than willing to redraft every line of the bill

but one, the one that gives them status as residents in the United

States because that one line assures the Vashchenkos and the

Chmykhalovs that we will guarantee to the best of our ability a

number of rights under our Constitution and also guarantee the

right to stay in the Embassy.

Mr. Chairman, the Department of State persists in believing that

quiet negotiations and sense of the Senate resolutions will somehow, sometime, resolve the problem. They have not yet. Only concerted action of the kind endorsed by 65 Senators in this bill and

continuing public pressure have any hope of moving the Soviet

Government. Millions of Americans are hoping that we take this

action.

I hope that we seize that. I suggest as well that we give hope to

the Vashchenkos and the Chmykhalovs. I know that their hopes

are very much focused on this bill. They have told me, as they have

told others, that they view this legislation as critical to their

future, and I think this bill does help give them a future. It keeps
22

their cause vivid and alive while it guarantees their physical security in our Embassy.

Mr. Chairman, in 1979 Ronald Reagan asked a simple question

in one of his radio commentaries. He said then that "our wheat

and technology can get into Russia•why can't the Vashchenko

and the Chmykhalov families get out?" Today, our wheat and technology still get into the Soviet Union, but these two families still

cannot get out.

Indeed, the State Department treats the matter as a problem for

the State Department instead of a problem for the Soviets. To legions of Americans who want and pray for their freedom, the

Vashchenkos and the Chmykhalovs are a cause, for the State Department they are a burden. I suggest we do something to change

that, and I hope this committee will agree that this bill gives us

hope of doing just that.

If I may add just one personal note. I know that the chairman of

this committee in particular is dedicated to doing that. While the

bill raises a number of questions, I know, in the minds of many

members of this committee, I believe deeply in my heart that the

chairman and other members of the committee want these families

free.

The depth of the feeling that I, and others such as Senator

Jepsen who has joined us, have about this bill will be appreciated

by the committee as also being a step in that direction.

I know that this committee joins very deeply in our efforts in

trying to find ways to force their exit and to guarantee their status

in our Embassy through putting pressure on the Russians.

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

[Prepared statement of Senator Levin follows:]
23

PREPARED STATEMENT OF SENATOR CARL LEVIN

Mr. Chairman, traditionally testimony of this kind begins with a series of

"thank yous" directed at the Committee, my co-sponsors, including Senators

Jepsen, Boren and 60 other Senators, and those members of the public who have

devoted their attention to the issue being considered. While I have a sincere

appreciation for the efforts you have made and the extraordinary efforts and

devotion of those in this room and thousands who couldn't be here, because the

situation we address today is unique, I think I ought to break with the

traditional introductory remarks.

I'm afraid that the plight of the Vashchenkos and the Chmykhalovs --

and the fact that the State Department is continuously unwilling to initiate

or support meaningful efforts to ameliorate it -- also breaks with tradition;

in this case, the traditional American love of freedom and the traditional

American commitment to help the oppressed and persecuted.

This Committee is familiar with the facts surrounding this case. You know

that, for the past three and a half years, these two families, these 7 people

have lived in a single 12' x 15' room in the United States Bnbassy in Moscow.

You know that, when they entered the Bnbassy on June 27, 1978, they were driven

by a desire for freedom and not by any conscious plan to seek asylum. You know

that forces beyond their control -- but forces directly under the control of

the Soviet Union -- created a situation which precluded them from leaving.

So there they sit, in that single small room, and hope that somehow someone will

come to their aid.

Now normally one might suspect that that someone would be the Government of

the United States. But, in this case, that suspicion would be wrong --as wrong

as the policy this government has adopted to deal with these families has been.

For three and a half years, our State Department has resisted attempts

to improve the lot of these families. Initially, State refused to protest

the Soviet decision to restrict mail deliveries to the families. State refused

to allow the families to engage in meaningful work within the Bnbassy compound.

State refused to allow members of the press to interview members of the family

unless the interviews were conducted outdoors.

It wasn't until individual members of the Congress and hundreds of private

citizens became involved in this case and started to pressure the State Department
that arrangenents were made which made life a little more tolerable for the

individuals involved. Throughout that entire "pressure" process, State resisted.

At every step they claimed that concessions in any of these areas would violate

"policy" or make the "ultimate" release of these people more difficult to

secure. Well, our policies were little by little changed, and the world did not

collapse. And, while their release is no closer, it is certainly no further away.

The State Department has made much of the kindness and consideration extended

to members of the families by individuals assigned to the Embassy, as well they

should. As individuals, many members of our diplomatic mission have been

extraordinarily humane. But, as a diplomatic mission, we have been terribly

inhumane and uncaring when faced with the reality of what these individual members

of the Vaschchenko and Chmykhalov families have had to endure.

As one who, with Senator Boren, visited the Embassy and the families, I

know we were struck by the hardships they have endured and hardships they

are still willing to endure in an effort to secure their freedom.

But those hardships do not seem to have impressed our State Department,

It seems at times as if they view these families as a hardship that the State

Department must endure. They view them as an embarassment to our government

rather than trying to embarass and, yes, shame the Soviet government into

releasing them.

their testimony this morning is typical of their approach. It is full

of concern, but not full of compassion, full of doubts but not desire, full of

detailed objections and short of determination to see these people freed.

Let's take a look at that testimony. It speaks in ringing tones of their

desire to see the quest for the right to emigrate affirmed. And it promises

that they will continue to explore "new ways to resolve...an extraordinarily

complex problem." But what are those new ways? They do not tell us. Are

they the ways which have resulted in the emigration of only ten Pentacostal

families from the Soviet Union when over 30,000 individual members of that

faith have made application? What has the State Department to offer us?

I fear that one of the things they may offer us is an approach first

tried in 1978 by then Ambassador Toon, requesting the families to return to

Chernogorsk and, in return, promising that our government will seek to secure

Russian promises of their safety and Russian pledges to allow their emigration.
25

In fact, I am informed that Ambassador Hartman has, like Ambassador Toon,

sought to strike just such a so-called "bargain" with the Vashchenkos and

the Chmykhalovs. In light of this effort, what are we to make of the promise

that the State Department has made this morning? How are we to evaluate their

claim that they have "made it clear to the families that they are free to

remain in refuge in the Embassy..."?

And even if these two families agreed to such an arrangement -- something

I would not recommend and something which 1 am told they have rejected -- what

kind of faith could we place in the Soviet pledge? They pledged at Helsinki

to allow freedom of worship and travel. And the Russian treatment of the

Vashchenkos and Oimykhalovs represents the culmination of that Russian pledge.

They pledged to free Isaac Elkowitz, a 13-year-old who took refuge in our

Embassy after his parents were killed at the close of World War II. And when

lie decided to accept that pledge 5 years later, hi left the Mbassy and, as

far as we know, left the world, h'e have not heard from him, or of him, for

nearly 30 years.

Representatives of the State Department have told my staff that they

would not object to this bill if it was simply redrafted to be a Sense of the

Congress Resolution. They don't object to the concept, just to the teeth,

the legal force of this legislation. But it is precisely the legal force that

interests me in two ways.

First, it guarantees that these families can stay in the Embassy. Given

the kinds of pressure State has exerted on them in the past, I think that would

be a significant accomplishment even if that was all this bill did.

But I believe it does more than that. Because secondly, it indicates to

the Soviets just how seriously we take this issue. None of the technical

legal concerns expressed by the State Department are insurmountable. And if

the Soviets felt pressured by meaningful American actions, they could surmount

them. I am more than willing to redraft this legislation in line with State's

suggestion to make the permanent residency grant effective as of now rather

than as of the date of their entry into the Embassy. In fact, I am more than

willing to redraft every' line of the bill but one, the one that gives them

status as residents in the Itnited States because that one line assures the

Vashchenkos and Chmvkhalovs that we will guarantee to the best of our ability
26

a number of rights under our Constitution and also guarantee the right to stay

in the Embassy.

Mr. Chairman, the Department of State persists in believing that quiet

negotiations and Sense of the Senate Resolutions will -- somehow, sometime --

resolve this problem. They have not. Only concerted action of the kind endorsed

by 65 Senators in this bill and continuing public pressure have any hope of

moving the Soviet government. Millions of Americans are hoping that we take

this action.

I suggest we seize that hope. I suggest as well that we give hope to the

Vashchenkos and Chmykhalovs. I know that their hopes are very much focused on

this bill. They have told me, as they have told others, that they view this

legislation as critical to their futures. And I think this bill does help

give them a future. It keeps their cause vivid and alive while it guarantess

physical security in our Embassy.

Mr. Chairman, in 1979 Ronald Reagan asked a simple question in one of his

radio commentaries. He said then that "our wheat and technology can get into

Russia -- why can't the Vashchenko and Chmykhalov families get out?" Today

our wheat and technology still get into the Soviet Union -- but these two

families still cannot get out. Indeed, the State Department treats the matter

as a problem for the State Department instead of a problem for the Soviets.

To legions of Americans who want and pray for their freedom, the Vashchenkos

and Chmykhalovs are a cause, for the State Department they are a burden. I

suggest we do something to change that. And I hope this Committee will agree

that this bill gives us hono of doing iust th.'
27

Senator SIMPSON. Thank you very much, Senator Levin. It is

indeed a correct appraisal of the chairman's feelings, and the feelings of the members of the committee, and I thank you very much.

I noted your comments about the possibility of a joint resolution,

but if we were to go to that, the necessity that the line one that

you refer to stay in.

Of course, we have heard the State Department and the Justice

Department testify about the legal extraterritoriality provisions,

and the diplomatic implications of the bill now as drafted, but you

have indicated your willingness to redraft, and the committee will

offer its assistance in any way if that is a possibility.

You and I, Senator Jepsen, and others, will confer about a closed

session. I look forward to working with you. I know of your deep

and very sincere interest in this situation.

Senator Jepsen, our good colleague, joins us now, another man

who has a deep human response to this issue, just as Senator Carl

Levin. He shares with him the depth of feeling on this issue.

I must inject a personal note that the three of us came to this

body at the same time, perhaps we have a closer tie there. But I

know of the sincerity of both of you on this issue, and I will appreciate hearing your testimony.

STATEMENT OF HON. ROGER W. JEPSEN, A U.S. SENATOR FROM

THE STATE OF IOWA

Senator JEPSEN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Thank you for this meeting, and I reinforce what our friend and

colleague Senator Levin has said. I appreciate the deep and sincere

feeling that you have for this issue, and like issues, and appearing

before this committee is somewhat of a joy and a comfort for me.

I am pleased to have this opportunity to commend my distinguished colleague from Michigan, Senator Carl Levin, for the unwavering leadership that he has provided by introducing S. 312 and

for calling international attention to the plight of two Russian families who have been victimized by the Soviet Government simply

for acknowledging their religious beliefs.

June 27 of this year marked the beginning of the fourth year

that the Vashchenko and Chmykhalov families have been forced to

seek asylum in the American Embassy in Russia.

What began as an effort to seek American assistance in emigrating from the Soviet Union on the grounds of religious persecution

has culminated into a nightmare for seven individuals. They have

been separated from other family members. Their living quarters

consist of a 12 by 15 foot basement room of the American Embassy.

They daily realize that outside the confines of the American Embassy, their lives are in great jeopardy. What crime have they committed that in their country they are hounded like criminals? They

have publicly expressed their belief in a living omnipotent God.

S. 312 would not guarantee the two families freedom. Only the

Soviet Government could grant them permission to emigrate. It

would, however, guarantee them protection under the U.S. Constitution while they continue to reside in the American Embassy and

would insure that they would be accommodated as well as possible

under present circumstances.
28

More importantly, however, this legislation would assert this administration's and this Congress' strong stand in support of the

Helsinki accords which condemn religious persecution.

In a strong statement of support for the two families, President

Reagan in 1979 stated that, "Detente is supposed to be a two-way

street. Our wheat and technology can get into Russia•Why can't

the Vashchenko and Chmykhalov families get out?"

I can assure you, from recent conversations with the administration and indirectly with the President, that he has not changed his

mind, he has not changed his thoughts. One of the subjects that

comes up most often in the morning briefings, I was advised yesterday by a member of the White House staff, is this subject, and I

think we will be hearing more about this shortly.

I am sorry I don't have something directly for this meeting, I had

hoped to but we just did not get ,it totally developed.

In prepared testimony, State Department officials have stated

that granting citizenship status to the families would "slender

chances of the family members to gain permission to emigrate from

the Soviet Union" alluding to the fact that such action would affect

Soviet sensibilities.

It is obvious to me and to others in this room that the Soviet

Union has shown little regard for Western sensibilities in their violation of treaties, in training terrorists, in financing Cubans in

Angola, in their support of Libyan adventurism. If we are to worry

about upsetting sensibilities, it should be the sensibilities of religious and freedom-loving people throughout the world that we

ought to worry about.

To the individuals who are daily being persecuted for their religious beliefs, the United States is the symbol of the freedom they

cherish. To many of these people, the United States is the hope

that makes their lives a little more bearable, the inspiration that

helps them continue their lonely struggle.

To not take a stand resolutely behind the families that have

come to be known as the "Siberian Seven" would be to encourage

forces of religious repression throughout the world to move against

people of faith without fear of serious or sustained American protest.

At issue is not only the freedom of seven individuals, Mr. Chairman. As leaders of the free world, will America stand up and speak

out against a violation of the most basic human right•the freedom

of thought and of worship.

Mr. Chairman, Senate file 312 reflects the spirit and the will of

the American people. Sixty-five Senators have cosponsored this legislation. As I mentioned, the President has publicly and privately

expressed his concern and support for the "Siberian Seven."

If the State Department does not believe that this legislation provides a proper vehicle for remedying this situation, I highly suggest

that they immediately propose alternative measures.

I not only speak for myself, because I heard Senator Levin indicate that he would be more than pleased to cooperate with the

State Department to resolve this situation. The only thing we will

not accept is to do nothing.
29

As the whole world watches, will America be intimidated? Will

this great country stand idly by as the Declaration of Human

Rights and the Helsinki accords are being violated?

Will we as Americans, who have procrastinated for over SV2

years, wait one more moment to publicly express our total support

for the "Siberian Seven" and millions of other individuals who are

being persecuted for their religious faith?

I think the answer to that is rather apparent this morning, no,

we are not going to do that here in the U.S. Senate, and if I read

the President and the administration correctly, we are not going to

let that continue in a stalemate any longer either.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for allowing me to testify this morning on what I hope you understand to be rather strong support of

Senate file 312.

[Prepared statement of Senator Jepsen follows:]
PREPARED STATEMENT OF SENATOR ROGER W. JEPSEN

MR. CHAIRMAN:

I AM PLEASED TO HAVE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO COMMEND MY DISTINGUISHED

COLLEAGUE FROM MICHIGAN, SENATOR CARL LEVIN, FOR THE UNWAVERING

LEADERSHIP THAT HE HAS PROVIDED BY INTRODUCING S. 312 AND FOR

CALLING INTERNATIONAL ATTENTION TO THE PLIGHT OF TWO RUSSIAN

FAMILIES WHO HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED BY THE SOVIET GOVERNMENT

SIMPLY FOR ACKNOWLEDGING THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS. JUNE 27TH

OF THIS YEAR MARKED THE BEGINNING OF THE FOURTH YEAR THAT THE

VASHCHENKO AND CHMYKHALOV FAMILIES HAVE BEEN FORCED TO SEEK

ASSYLUM IN THE AMERICAN EMBASSY IN RUSSIA.

WHAT BEGAN AS AN EFFORT TO SEEK AMERICAN ASSISTANCE IN EMIGRATING

FROM THE SOVIET UNION ON THE GROUNDS OF RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION HAS

CULMINATED INTO A NIGHTMARE FOR 7 INDIVIDUALS. THEY HAVE BEEN

SEPARATED FROM OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS. THEIR LIVING QUARTERS CONSIST

OF A 12 x 15 FOOT BASEMENT ROOM OF THE AMERICAN EMBASSY. THEY

DAILY REALIZE THAT OUTSIDE THE CONFINES OF THE AMERICAN EMBASSY,

THEIR LIVES ARE IN GREAT JEOPARDY. WHAT CRIME HAVE THEY COMMITED

THAT IN THEIR COUNTRY THEY ARE HOUNDED LIKE CRIMINALS? THEY

HAVE PUBLICALLY EXPRESSED THEIR BELIEFS IN A LIVING, OMNIPOTENT

m

S. 312 WOULD NOT GUARANTEE THE TWO FAMILIES FREEDOM - ONLY THE

SOVIET GOVERNMENT COULD GRANT THEM PERMISSION TO EMIGRATE. IT

WOULD, HOWEVER, GUARANTEE THEM PROTECTION UNDER THE U. S.

CONSTITUTION WHILE THEY CONTINUE TO RESIDE IN THE AMERICAN EMBASSY

AND WOULD INSURE THAT THEY WOULD BE ACCOMMODATED AS WELL AS

POSSIBLE UNDER PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCES. MORE IMPORTANTLY, HOWEVER,
31

2

THIS LEGISLATION WOULD ASSERT THIS ADMINISTRATION'S AND THIS

CONGRESS'S STRONG STAND IN SUPPORT OF THE HELSINKI ACCORDS WHICH

CONDEMN RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION.

IN A STRONG STATEMENT OF SUPPORT FOR THE TWO FAMILIES. IN 1979 THEN

CANDIDATE REAGAN STATED THAT, "DETENTE IS SUPPOSED TO BE A TWO-WAY

STREET. OUR WHEAT AND TECHNOLOGY CAN GET INTO RUSSIA -- WHY CAN'T

THE VASHCHENKO AND CHMYKHALOV FAMILIES GET OUT?"

I HAVE BEEN ASSURED BY WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS, THAT THE PRESIDENT

REMAINS CONCERNED OVER THE PLIGHT OF THE CAPTIVE FAMILIES, AND THAT

HE CONTINUES TO SUPPORT AMERICAN EFFORTS WHICH MIGHT SERVE TO

ALLEVIATE THEIR PLIGHT.

IN PREPARED TESTIMONY, STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS HAVE STATED

THAT GRANTING CITIZENSHIP STATUS TO THE FAMILIES WOULD "SLENDER

CHANCES OF THE FAMILY MEMBERS TO GAIN PERMISSION TO EMIGRATE FROM

THE SOVIET UNION" ALLUDING TO THE FACT THAT SUCH ACTION WOULD

AFFECT SOVIET SENSIBILITIES. IT IS OBVIOUS TO ME AND OTHERS IN

THIS ROOM THAT THE SOVIET UNION HAS SHOWN LITTLE REGARD FOR

WESTERN SENSITIVTIES IN THEIR VIOLATION OF TREATIES, IN TRAINING

TERRORISTS, IN FINANCING CUBANS IN ANGOLA, IN THEIR SUPPORT OF

LYBIAN ADVENTURISM. IF WE ARE TO WORRY ABOUT UPSETTING SENSIBILITIES,

IT SHOULD BE THE SENSIBILITIES OF RELIGIOUS AND FREEDOM-LOVING

PEOPLE THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
TO THE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE DAILY BEING PERSECUTED FOR THEIR RELIGIOUS

BELIEFS, THE UNITED STATES IS THE SYMBOL OF THE FREEDOM THEY CHERISH.

TO MANY OF THESE PEOPLE THE UNITED STATES IS THE HOPE THAT MAKES THEIR

LIVES A LITTLE MORE BEARABLE -- THE INSPIRATION THAT HELPS THEM

CONTINUE THEIR LONELY STRUGGLE. TO NOT TAKE A STAND RESOLUTELY

BEHIND THE FAMILIES THAT HAVE COME TO BE KNOWN AS THE "SIBERIAN

SEVEN" WOULD BE TO ENCOURAGE FORCES OF RELIGIOUS REPRESSION

THROUGHOUT THE WORLD TO MOVE AGAINST PEOPLE OF FAITH WITHOUT

FEAR OF SERIOUS OR SUSTAINED AMERICAN PROTEST. AT ISSUE IS NOT

ONLY THE FREEDOM OF 7 INDIVIDUALS. AS THE LEADER OF THE FREE

WORLD, WILL AMERICA STAND UP AND SPEAK OUT AGAINST A VIOLATION

OF THE MOST BASIC HUMAN RIGHT - THE FREEDOM1OF THOUGHT AND OF

WORSHIP.

MR, CHAIRMAN, S. 312 REFLECTS THE SPIRIT AND THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN

PEOPLE. 65 SENATORS HAVE COSPONSORED THIS LEGISLATION. AS I

MENTIONED, THE PRESIDENT HAS PUBLICALLY AND PRIVATELY EXPRESSED

HIS CONCERN AND SUPPORT FOR THE "SIBERIAN SEVEN."

IF THE STATE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT THIS LEGISLATION

SERVES AS A PROPER VEHICLE FOR REMEDYING THIS SITUATION, I HIGHLY

SUGGEST THAT THEY IMMEDIATELY PROPOSE ALTERNATIVE MEASURES.

AS THE WHOLE WORLD WATCHES, WILL AMERICA BE INTIMIDATED? WILL THIS

GREAT COUNTRY STAND IDLY BY AS THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND

THE HELSINKI ACCORDS ARE BEING VIOLATED? WILL WE AS AMERICANS,

WHO HAVE PROCRASTINATED FOR OVER 3* YEARS, WAIT ONE MORE MOMENT

TO PUBLICALLY EXPRESS OUR TOTAL SUPPORT FOR THE SIBERIAN SEVEN AND

MILLIONS OF OTHER INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE BEING PERSECUTED FOR THEIR -

RELIGIOUS FAITH?

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, FOR ALLOWING ME TO TESTIFY THIS MORNING

IN STRONG SUPPORT OF S. 312.
33

Senator SIMPSON. Indeed, I do understand that and the depth of

it from you both. Your presentations, I think, are the very noblest

expression of Judeo-Christian philosophy that is the engine that

has produced the energy to make this country what it is. I very

much appreciate your being here.

Thank you very much.

Senator LEVIN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Senator JEPSEN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Senator SIMPSON. The next panel consists of Jane Drake, secretary for the Society of Americans for the Vashchenko Emigration;

Blahoslav S. Hruby, executive director of Research Center for Religion and Human Rights in Closed Societies; and Kent Hill, assistant professor of history at the Seattle Pacific University.

Let me make a special note to indicate that Senator Heflin of Alabama very much wanted to be present this morning to lend his

support to Senate bill 312, and introduce and present Jane Drake

of Alabama to the chairman and to the subcommittee. Unfortunately, he has just advised me that his Senate duties have delayed

him from being present this morning.

As an original cosponsor of this measure, he is a strong advocate

of the legislation that we are considering today, and he is very

sorry that he cannot be present to present Jane Drake to this subcommittee. He has followed the activities of this subcommittee very

closely, I can tell you that from a personal expression, and he is

disappointed that he is not able to make the introduction today.

With that will you please proceed, Ms. Drake, please.

STATEMENT OF JANE DRAKE, SECRETARY, SOCIETY OF AMERICANS FOR VASHCHENKO EMIGRATION AND CHMYKHALOVS

FAMILIES PERSECUTION AND EMIGRATION ATTEMPTS OF

VASHCHENKO SINCE 1962

Ms. DRAKE. Peter Vashchenko's battle to emigrate from the

Soviet Union is a 20-year-old struggle. He started in 1962 originally, before there was an emigration movement in the Soviet Union.

He wanted to do everything through the legal channels. Therefore,

in 1962 he made his first visit to Moscow, to go to the Kremlin

first, and then to the U.S. Embassy, to inquire about how he would

go about emigrating from the Soviet Union.

His trip was unsuccessful. He was escorted back to Chernogorsk

by the KGB, and 2 months later he was arrested and sentenced to

prison for 3 years. But the hope of these two families did not stop

with this arrest, and from 1962 until 1967 they tried over and over,

always trying to go through the legal channels of the Soviet Union

to emigrate.

Instead of being granted emigration, Peter Vashchenko spent 2

more years in a labor camp, and some time was spent in a psychiatric hospital. His wife, Augustina, was beaten severely, and was

sentenced to 3 years in prison.

Their children were taken from them, sent to a home for reeducation in the doctrine of atheism, and spent a total of 8 years away

from their parents. During some of this time, the parents did not

know where their children were.
34

From the Congressional Record of 1977 concerning the implementation of the Helsinki accords, there is a reference to Peter

Vashchenko on page 23, "Imprisonment in psychiatric hospitals. In

1968, they put Peter Vashchenko in psychiatric hospital No. 15 because he had applied to emigrate. Peter Vashchenko asked the

doctor, 'What diagnosis will you write on the history of my illness?'

The doctor answered, 'Normal people don't make applications for

emigration.'"

Always the Soviet officials told the Vashchenkos and the Chmykhalovs, "You have to have an invitation to emigrate." So in April

of 1977, when they received through the international mail an invitation from Pastor Cecil Williamson of Selma, Ala., they were

elated.

They went back to the Soviet officials, but this time, after being

passed from office to office in Chernogorsk, they were told now

that the invitation was a trick, and they now should go to the

American Embassy to ask further advice from the Americans. I

have in my testimony a letter from the Vashchenkos naming the

Soviet officials, and the offices that they held, actually instructing

them to go back to the American Embassy for help.

So Peter Vashchenko in 1977, and the Chmykhalov family, went

back to Moscow, and on June 27, 1978, attempted to enter the

American Embassy. Instead of being allowed to enter, even though

they had a document from the Vice Consul and an invitation to

emigrate, the Soviet soldiers who keep people out of our American

Embassy, including Americans unless they have an American passport on them, did not allow the Vashchenkos and Chmykhalovs to

enter the Embassy. They ran past the Soviets, but only seven of the

eight made it to safety.

John Vashchenko was beaten severely, taken away by the KGB,

and was tortured for 1 week. It was then that the Vashchenkos and

the Chmykhalovs decided to remain inside that Embassy to preserve their own lives, the life of John, and also the lives of their

children back home in Chernogorsk. They never intended to take

asylum in our Embassy. They never intended to stay in our Embassy, not even an hour. They only went with their invitations of emigration to find out what to do next.

Since July of 1978, I have been working on this case. I have dedicated the greater part of my life to it, and I have also become well

aware of the deceitfulness of the Soviet Union.

I was asked by the U.S. State Department m January to formulate new invitations for the~"Vashchenko family because now the

Soviet officials in Chernogorsk were telling us that the old invitations were out of date, and they had to have new invitations. At

this time, the Chernogorsk Soviet officials of the emigration office

were saying that they would process the children's papers if they

only had these new invitations.

So I began to formulate these new invitations, which I did by the

letter of the Soviet law. In the meantime, the Soviets in Chernogorsk were busy collecting money from the children to renounce

the children's Soviet citizenship, which is one of the things that

they must do in the process of their emigration. The children had

to buy this, and now they are stateless persons. They are not Soviet

citizens.
35

In the meantime, I have become aware of a Soviet trick. The

needed invitations are impossible to get. Here they are. The last

step in processing these invitations is that they must be sent to the

Soviet Embassy in Washington to be authenticated, but the Soviets

have returned them to us twice.

I have a tape of Cecil Williamson speaking with the Soviet official, and also a letter from the Soviet Embassy in which they have

told us that they are not going to authenticate these invitations,

and that the Vashchenkos and the Chmykhalovs are an American

problem.

On the one hand, you have the Soviets in Chernogorsk demanding the invitations, so that the children may emigrate, and on the

other hand you have the Soviets in Washington refusing to authenticate the invitations. So it is a totally impossible situation.

Lately, Parade magazine has become very interested in covering

this story. In October of this year, they took me to Moscow, and I

was able to meet with the people that I have learned to love in the

last 3 years. They are the bravest and most courageous people that

I have ever met in my entire life.

As I sat in the basement with these people, they calmly told me

that when the time came that they should have to leave the Embassy, possibly some of them are going to die, and the only person

who was upset was me, because they are the bravest people that I

have ever seen, and they were calm and resolved to doing this. But,

they will not leave that Embassy without a price, and the price is

the lives of their children in Chernogorsk. They will leave the Embassy if their children in Chernogorsk are allowed to emigrate.

As you see, I have made separate invitations for all of the family

members, therefore, there is no reason why the children are not allowed to emigrate, except that the Soviets will not authenticate the

invitations.

I discussed at length this bill with the family because I wanted to

honestly find out what was their opinion of it, because this is the

only chance in their entire life that they are free, and they should

form their own destiny. They want this bill very much. They put

all their hope in this bill. There are thousands of Americans who

also want this bill.

I consider this case a singular and unique case. Peter Vashchenko's saga started 20 years ago in the new year 1962. The new year

of 1982 is approaching. His emigration struggle will be a 20-year

old story, and now it is time for us to stand with these people. I

think S. 312 is one of the strongest, most determined statements by

the people of the United States to the Soviet Government condemning their appalling mistreatment of human beings.

The Vashchenko and Chmykhalov families do not want to compromise with the Soviets. They want this bill, and I urge this committee to approve this bill on behalf of these families who have endured so much for so many years.

[Statement of Ms. Drake and additional material follow:]
PREPARED STATEMENT OF JANE DRAKE

In the Soviet Union it is against the law to teach your child about God in

the home. It is against Soviet law to take your chi^ * to the registered

state church before the age of 18. Atheism is taught in the schools and upon

entering the Soviet Army, one must vov total allegiance to the atheistic state

of the Soviet Union. Because of thes- conditions exis ing in the U.S.S.R.,

Peter Vashchenko in 1962 found it impossible to continue to live in the Soviet

Union. It was in October of that year 1962 that Peter with a few members of

his family made their first trip to Moscow to ask instructions from the Kremlin

and the American Embassy on how a Soviet citizen might emigrate from the Soviet

Union. Daughters, Lyuba, Lida, and Nadya were not among the group going to

Moscow for at this time they had been taken from their parents and were being

held against their will in a state boarding school. The 1962 trip was unsuccessful. Soviet militia barred their entrance to the American Embassy and

the Kremlin gave them a KBG escort back to Chernogorsk. Because of this trip

to Moscow, Peter Vashchenko was arrested and sentenced to two years in prison.

Between 1962-1975 other trips were made to Moscow in attempts to obtain information on how to emigrate; a stay in the U. S. Embassy was never planned or

intended. As a result of these trips to Moscow, Peter once again was arrested,

sentenced for a short time to a psychiatric hospital, and to one year in a labor

camp. There is a record of Peter's confinement in this psychiatric hospital

in the Congressional Record on Hearings before the Commission on Security and

Cooperation in Europe, ninety-fifth Congress, first session on implementation

of the Helsinki Accords Vol. II, religious liberty and minority rights in the

Soviet Union April 27 and 28, 1977. Allow me to read page 23 under "Imprisonment in Psychiatric Hospitals."

"In 1968, they put Peter Vashchenko in psychiatric hospital #15 because

he had applied to emigrate. P. Vashchenko asked the doctor, "What diagnosis

will you write on the history of my illness?" The doctor answered, "Normal

people don't make applications for emigration."

Augustina (wife of Peter and mother of 13 children) also suffered because of

the family's attempts to emigrate. In 1968, she was arrested and sentenced

to 3 years in prison. Four of the Vashchenko daughters were again taken from

their parents and sent to another state boarding school. Several of the

Vashchenko children have spent more than 6 years each away from their home

and parents in these state boarding homes for reeducation. Much of the time

Peter and Augustina did not know the whereabouts of these daughters.

In 1975 Liliya Dimitrievna Dugina, Cherogorsk instructor on religious affairs

and deputy of the city committee, told the Vashchenko family that their

emigration had been granted and that they would possibly go abroad as early

as May 1. She told the family to prepare to emigrate, asking if the children

had clothes. Dugina told them, "You are American citizens and should turn to

the American Embassy for everything." The Vashchenko family sold their life

sustaining potatoes and waited. It was all a sham, possibly to cause the

Vashchenkos to suffer an economic hardship since they had prepared to leave

and'had sold their potatoes.

Another tradegy occurred in 1975. Aran, the four month old adopted son of

Lida, was taken by force by the KGB with Liliya Dugina's help from the

Vashchenkos. Lida suffered a severe beating as well as her sister, Nadya,

in the incident. Once again in order to obtain some word about Aran, the

Vashchenko family went to Moscow. At that time, September, 1975, the American

Embassy gave them immigration forms which they were to fill out as soon as

they should receive an invitation to emigrate from abroad. American consul

officers handed them a document to show the Soviet police at the gate and a

telephone number to call if they were stopped. They were advised by the

Americans to return if they had any problems. After they returned to

Chernogorsk, Soviet officials told them that Aran was dead.

In 1977 Rev. Cecil Williamson of Selma, Alabama, sent an invitation to

emigrate to the Vashchenko family. With this invitation the family went to

the local Chernogorsk Ovir but with no results. Emigration was not denied but
37

at the same time procedures to process their papers were not begun. The

Vashchenkos were passed from office to office finally ending in Krasnoyarsk,

where they were told that the invitation was a trick. *

Therefore the Vashchenko family planned their last trip to Moscow, this time

taking along a neighbor and her son, Maria Chmykhalov and Timofei. Once at

the U. S. Embassy the Soviet soldiers barred their entrance. All eight of the

party attempted to enter the Embassy. Seven succeeded, but young 16 year old

John Vashchenko was grabbed by the Soviet soldiers and thrown to the cement.

He was brutally beaten at the entrance of our Embassy and taken away to be

tortured for a week by the Soviets. At the time of the beating the seven

begged help for John but the consular officer answered that he could not

complain to the police about their handling of a Soviet citizen. Nine days

later the seven were able to talk with family in Chernogorsk and found out

what had happened to John. In order to save their lives and those of their

family members at home, they decided to remain in the U. S. Embassy until

allowed to emigrate.

Official U. S. Embassy policy was less than helpful. For two months they sat

on the divans in the consular waiting room and were fed by handouts from

sympathetic embassy personnel. When Ambassador Toon realized that they were

not going to tire and leave, he had them placed in a small room in the basement

of the Embassy and formed a restricted list of those who could and could not

have contact with the families. Correspondents could interview the families

in the courtyard only, regardless of what kind of weather it was. The

families were not allowed to attend church services held on the Embassy

compound. Not until after much protest from the West were they allowed to

go to these services. At one time the families were restricted from having

any visitors for a 6 month period. This in itself would have demoralized the

average person, but the families remained strong. One consular officer asked

them more than once, "Which of you will have the courage to leave here first?"

They were even told that they were not good parents by American officials.

On August 26, 1978, before the families had been placed in their basement room,

they had been ordered to leave the Embassy. From page 251 of The Siberian

Seven by John Pollock: "At 8:15 P.M. an Embassy couple who had become particularly friendly were ordered to leave by the Marine guard, who stated that

they had no authority to be there. The political officer, accompanied by

the consul, entered at 8:30 P.M., saying that inscructions had come from

Washington, and read out a statement. The ambassador, he added, had supposed

the Siberians were honest people but they had turned out not to be, because

they would not go. Their presence hindered their own cause and slowed the

emigration of believers. The Seven must depart that very evening. 'And now

quickly gather up your things and leave with God. I will accompany you to the

gates.' "

"The Seven reacted in deepest distress, especially in the light of all

that they had endured down the years, including mocking that "the Americans

don't want you."

"We answered that we would not walk out with our own legs and that if they

wanted us to leave the Embassy they would have to drag us out and turn us over

to the Soviet authorities for extermination."

When Ambassador Watson replaced Ambassador Toon, in some ways conditions

worsened. I submit a memo of Ambassador Watson's in which he again declares

restrictions on visitation rights and forbids Embassy families to act as

intermediaries passing communications and printed materials to and from the

Pentecostalists.

Since July of 1978, I have spent the greater part of my life trying to obtain

help for the Bashchenko and Chmykhalov families. Although Embassy policy has

softened and now Moscow consular officer Kurt Strubel claims a change in

tactics by allowing and encouraging news media coverage of this case, we of

S.A.V.E. worked hard to get the story out in 1978, 1979 and 1980, while at

* In an attached letter dated November 5, 1981> from the Vashchenko family

to Ambassador Hartman. the Vashohenko family name the local Siberian Soviet

officials who told them to go to the American Embassy to obtain help in

emigrating*
38

the same time Bob Farrand of the U. S. State Department was stating that they

did not want this to be a news media event. The restricted measures taken by

the Embassy put us three years behind in our work. In January of 1979

several proainent senators were quote "reluctantly" persuaded by Ambassador

Malcolm Toon not to see the families. It was in April of 1979, at the request

of S.A.V.E. that two Alabama Congressmen took a strong stand and insisted on

seeing the families. Congressman Shelby on returning home told S.A.V.E. that

Ambassador Toon had taken him aside and asked him not to see the families.

Congressman Shelby replied that he had to see the families and was permitted

to do so. In an article which Congressman Shelby placed in the Selma TimesJournal on May 6, 1979, he called his visit with the families a "heart opener",

he condemned the Embassy's treatment of the families, and suggested that this

case called for extraordinary action at the highest reaches of our government.

Shelby's article is submitted for evidence - "Embassy Inmates Endure Daily

Abuse".

While conditions in the Embassy were not pleasant, Soviet officials in

Chernogorsk were making life hard for the Vashchenko and Chmykhalov family

members at home. The Vashchenkos and Chmykhalovs had been denounced as

traitors in the publication the "Chernogorsk Worker" and papers for the

Vashchenkos' arrest upon their return home had already been filed in

Chernogorsk. Peter's brother Grigory had been told by the OVIR in Nakhodka,

"If you apply for emigration, we'll put you in prison. When your brother,

Peter, comes back to file his application, we'll trap him. He won't go anywhere. "

In 1977, the oldest Vashchenko son, Alexander (Sasha), had been sentenced to

three years in a labor camp for refusal to take military oaths objectional

to his faith and serve in the Soviet Army. During Sasha's term he has been

near death on several occasions as a result of beatings and long periods of

time spent in cold isolation cells without a life sustaining amount of food.

Camp directors tried time and time again to force him to sign papers denouncing his family and agreeing not to emigrate. On his refusal, severe punishments were dealt out. In August 1980, Sasha was near death and without

sufficient clothes. Senator Hatfield met with Soviet Embassy concerning Sasha's

condition. At the same time I took clothes for Sasha to the Soviet Embassy.

The Soviets refused the clothes. Senator Hatfield and I were instructed by

the Soviet Embassy to send these clothes to Sasha through the international mail.

I present this returned box of clothes from Siberia with Sasha's name,

Alexander, marked unknown. Two boxes were sent. Sasha received neither. If

the Vashchenkos should leave the Embassy, they will be lost ^forever and boxes

sent to them will return to us marked "inconnu".

In January of 1981, the State Department asked me to prepare new invitations

for the Vashchenkos because local Ovir officials had told the Vashchenko

children that they would process their papers if they had new invitations.

Meanwhile the Soviet officials have collected a sufficient sum of money from

the Vashchenko children and accepted their papers for renunciation of Soviet

citizenship. The children are now stateless persons and have once again

begun the process of filing for emigration. On our part, we of S.A.V.E.,

completed the new invitations which were done correctly by the letter of the

Soviet law and authenticated by the U. S. State Department. The last step

in forming invitations after State Department authentication, was to have

them authenticated by the Soviet Embassy and returned to us for mailing to

the U.S.S.R. I submit as evidence a tape of a conversation between Rev.

Cecil Williamson, President of S.A.V.E., and a Soviet consular officer in

the Soviet Embassy in which the officer refuses to authenticate our invitations

and claims that the families are an American problem, not a Soviet problem.

Also, a letter is submitted for evidence from A. Chuplygin, vice consul of the

Soviet Embassy, stating two reasons why the Soviets refuse to authenticate our

invitations:

1. Only close relatives can invite persons from the U.S.S.R. for

permanent residence abroad.

2. Above named persons are residing illegally in the U. S. Embassy.

The procedure of emigration can begin only after their departure

from the Embassy. The U. S. authorities are well informed about

this position of the Soviet side.
39

If the Soviets should hold to number 1., then there should no longer be a reason

for the State Department to suggest* advise, insist on a return trip to

Chernogorsk by the seven Vashchenko and Chmykhalov family members in our Embassy.

Concerning number 2., we of S.A.V.E. should like to remind the Soviets of their

illegal beating and torturing of John Vashchenko at the entrance of our Embassy.

While Soviet officials are refusing to authenticate our new invitations of emigration, the Soviet Ovir officials in Chernogorsk are busy at work collecting

money from the Vashchenko children (a fee to renounce their citizenship and

begin emigration procedures). In May of 1981, chief of Chernogorsk Ovir,

Romanova, went to the home of the Vashchenko children to discuss and give instructions on their emigration.

I will be the first to admit very happily that I was wrong if this does not

end up being another Soviet trick. Now that the Soviets have gotten the

children's money, which the children had to borrow, the Soviets can attempt

to discourage and destroy the children's morale with their deceit.

In October of this year. Parade Magazine took me to Moscow, where I was able

to meet in person the people that I have learned to love in the past three

years. They are the bravest and purest human beings I have ever known. As

they quietly told me that if and when they should have to leave the Embassy,

that some of them will probably die, they were calm and resolved. I was the

only one shaken. They are ready to give their lives, but not without a price.

The price is the emigration of their children in Chernogorsk. *

I discussed at length bill S. 312 with the families in order to find out their

true feelings about the bill. They want the bill very much. All their hopes

lie with this bill. Thousands of Americans want the permanent residency bill

S. 312 for the Vashchenko and Chmykhalov families. Their case is unique and

singular. Peter Vashchenko's saga began New Years 1962. 1982 is scon

approaching. This New Year the Vashchenko struggle for emigration will be a

20 year old story. It is time to take a stand with these people. S. 312

is the strongest statement yet made to the Soviet government concerning their

mistreatment of human beings. The Vashchenkos ind Chmykhalovs want no compromise with the Soviets. We of S.A.V.E. want what the families want. Please

pass S. 312 out of this subcommittee.

Jane Drake

Secretary of S.A.V.E.

Bt 1 Box 49-A

Pike Boad, Alabama 36106

* Please read attached letter dated November 5, 1961, from the Vashchenko

family to Ambassador Hartnan.
40

[From the Selma Times-Journal, May 1979)

EMBASSY INMATES ENDURE DAILY ABUSE

WASHINGTON.•Imagine living with six other people crammed in a 12-foot by 20-

foot basement completely cut off from the outside world.

Imagine your mail opened, read, censored and sometimes not even delivered at

all, while your own attempts to contact friends and relatives on the outside are

denied.

Imagine yourself surrounded by hostile guards and having to endure their taunts

and abuse daily, while each night your sleep is shattered by the sounds of their billyclubs beating on the windows and bars of your cell.

Life in a maximum security prison where only the most incorrigible of society are

isolated?

No, those are the conditions two families of Pentecostal Christians have to endure

in our own American Embassy in Moscow.

The seven people•five members of the Pyotr Vashchenko family and two of the

Mariya Chmykhalov family•have been holed up in the Embassy since June, when

they rushed past Soviet guards and sought asylum from the religious persecution

that is part of the Russian way of life.

The Vashchenkos and Chmykhalovs want to emigrate to the United States and

have found friends in Selma, Alabama, where the Crescent Hill Presbyterian

Church has offered to sponsor their resettlement here. But the Soviet Union, whose

recent history of human rights violations is notorious, refuses to let the seven Christians out.

During my recent trip to Russia during the Congressional Easter recess, I had the

opportunity to meet with the Christian dissidents in the Embassy and convey to

them the hopes and prayers of those of us in the United States who are working for

their release.

To say that the visit was an eye-opener would be an understatement•it was more

a "heart opener" to see the faith and grace these Christians displayed under the

most adverse of conditions. Their belief in God and hope for eventual freedom remains strong even though their immediate prospects for release are not good.

During my visit, the first the Christians have had from a Congressman, I presented them with a small Bible that was a gift from the Crescent Hill congregation, told

them about the attempts by their friends in the United States to secure their release, and gave them a stack of newspaper clippings concerning their plight.

In return, they gave me a letter, addressed "Dear Friends," for delivery to all

their unseen and unknown fellow Christians in the United States who are working

in their behalf.

The letter said, in part:

"We saw that God heard your and our prayers. (The visit) has reassured us that

God will continue to stand beside us in the future. May God bless you for the work

you have done for God and us."

That work, of course, must continue.

After conferring with State Department officials in Washington and U.S. Ambassador Malcolm Toon and Embassy personnel in Moscow, I came to the conclusion

that going through standard Soviet channels will probably be futile for the Vashchenkos and Chmykhalovs, even though Russian exist permits for religious dissidents are reaching an all-time high.

Soviet officials have been particularly stubborn in the case of the Christians in

the American Embassy and I concluded that even if formal attempts for visas are

continued, the chances are the Russians will only let a couple•if any•of them out.

Breaking up such close-knit families, united not only by blood, but by their tremendous faith, would, of course, be almost as bad as keeping them imprisoned in

the Embassy indefinitely.

So it seems to me this case calls for extraordinary action at the highest reaches of

our government.

Accordingly, I wrote President Jimmy Carter immediately upon my return and

urged him to personally become involved in the attempts to get the Vashchenkos

and Chmykhalovs•all of them•out of Russia and safely to the United States.

I told President Carter that such aid is the essence of his own fight for human

rights around the world. I concluded by asking Carter, who is, as we all know, a

deeply religious man himself, for his help in the name of Christian charity.

I also ask all Christians in the United States and elsewhere who are concerned by

the plight of the Vashchenkos, Chmykhalovs and others like them in the Soviet

Union to unite in the fight to free them from domination by this atheistic and totalitarian state.
41

Write your Congressmen and Senators, write President Carter and write Soviet

President Leonid Brezhnev. Tell them if there is no room for Christians in Russia,

there is certainly room for them here.

Moscow, EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATES,

November 5, 1981.

To AMBASSADOR HEARTMAN,

From VASHCHENKO FAMILY (PETER, AUGUSTINA, LIDIA, LILIA AND LIUBOV.)

DEAR MR. HEARTMAN: We are grateful to the American government for the hospitality that has been given to our family during the past three years and four

months.

We were told by the Consulate of the Embassy that you, Mr. Heartman, are going

to speak with the Soviet government on the highest level about permission to emigrate to the USA for our eleven (11) children who at this present time live in Chernogorsk. We thank you very much for your wish to help in the question of our emigration.

When we can be assured by means of a telephone call from our children together

with our sponsor in America, Mrs. Janie Drake, that all children are in America

and got there safely we would leave the Embassy with the assurance of the Soviet

government that you will get from them as the Consulate told us. The assurance

should consist of this: that the Soviets will not persecute us and will not punish us

for our stay in the Embassy for these three years and four months but will reunite

us with our children in America in the shortest time, a few days, in view of the

serious and hard illnesses of my wife and our mother, Augustina, since our stay in

the Embassy has not been our fault. Our family was sent here by the Soviet authorities, by the Executive of the Religious affairs of the region town of Krasnoirk, Mr.

Bronevich, and by the chief of the Chernogorsk Committee, Mrs. G. Andrushchenko.

Also a document to receive help for our emigration was given us by the Consuls of

the Embassy in 1975.

We would be grateful to the Soviet government if they will follow their words as

Mr. Bronevich and Mrs. Andrushchenko told us, that we should go to the American

Embassy and ask them to accept our family for the permanent residence in the

USA and if the American government would agrees the Soviets will not prevent us

from emigrating from the USSR.

The emigration of our family would serve as a measure of trust between the two

countries and a movement toward peace.

We would like to thank you again, Mr. Heartman, for your effort to help our

family to leave the Soviet Union. We ask and hope to see you before your meeting

with the Soviets.

Sincerely,

THE VASHCHENKO FAMILY.
42

(Erramtl ISjill Prrabytrriau (Eljurrb

PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN AMERICA

Crescent Hill Drive

StlMA, ALABAMA 36701

August 12, 1981

CECIL WILLIAMSON, JR.

MINISTER

Yevgeniy S. Antiptov

Counselor and Consul

Embassy of the U.S.S.R.

Dear Counselor Antiptov*

Enclosed in this packet are invitations of emigration for all 16

members of the Peter Vashchenko family. Also enclosed is a check

in the amount of S240 to cover processing expenses of these 16

invitations. After your authentication processing, it would be

greatly appreciated if you would return these completed invitations and verifications to me as soon as possible.

^Lclz/^^,

Cecil Williamson

cc. United States State Department - Jim VanLaningh&m

President Eonald Reagan

'Citizens Bank and Trust of Selma

^^5 Selma, Alabama 36701

JHBP Affiliate ol Southern Bancorrxxation

IVOTIIB EMBASSY OF THE U.S.S.R.

61-61?

622

DATK August 14 lOAL

<; 240.00

Pnt.I.AUN

,,.,.., .,., ,• .CCOUK. "0

I?ll.)l0ll|« I is I 5 I 11 cL-eii. JUMJ*~**^

For processing expenses of 16 invitations

to emigrate of the Peter iSQfi 2 JOfi • ? Z'S

V.^rlirnko Family
43

EMBASSY OF THE

UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS

CONSULAR DIVISION

1B2S PHELPS PLACE. N.W.

WASHINGTON. O.C. 2000ft

(202) 332-1513

(9:00 A.M.-12:30 P.M.)

Cecil Williamson, Jr.

Minister

Dear Mr. Williamson:

We are returning the enclosed invitations on our expence without legalization for two main reasons:

1. Only close relatives can invite persons from the USSR for permanant

residence abroad .

2. Above named persons are residing illigally in the US-Biibassy. The

procedare of emigration can begin only after their depature from the

Bnbassy. 'The US authorities are wellinformed about this position of

the Soviet side.

Sincerely Yours,

A. Chuplygin

Vice Consul
44

fj0 81/09099

tea pistes of America

if))Aj

y$n$

Si•$

^

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

;n all fa iuI;om ii?£se presents sljalt ccmc, directing:

I Certify Thai thz document hereunto annexed is under the Seal oj the State of:

A labamz *

in tcstimonij mljevraf, /, ftfafrfop #m rflftPfflMMtfj dr*j

Secretary of Slate, have hereunto caused the seal of tht DepartActing

ment of Slate to he affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer of the said Department, a! the city of Washington, in

the District of Cokuribia, this $*»$ftA ;.

day of fjff*. , I9M:.

aEs&m iJaJU&A- JbhuL*«jA I NO ht.si-OMiim.riy j

v

J MflW) cj STZty

Aciin'j A>it\'.tiaitiort Q&trrffikpmrtmvii of Slr.U.

tie is not tariff if it is removed or altered in any Wat/ idiatso.Oer.
45

eu'jijO&ij

STATE OFALABAMA

I, Don Siegelman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "3ill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine,

In Testimony Whereof, 1 have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31, 1981

Don Siegelman

S*

Secretary of State
46

WILLIAM A. KYNARO

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

3B7QI

Mill IONA OUROIN

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "Bill" KynarflVJ '
47

TB^JMUML /Biaoe/ ox'JiJOL'U

J, the undersimed Cacll Williamson Jr.

fl, BBcnoomcuaMJlcA ; IMinuoJ /nojwoe •»«/

• cltlten (peraanent rcildont) of the United States of ninci

rpaxauooi /nocTBiBuaill aoac*>/ GOCAXMCXXUX UraTOB Avepiuai, opurjouazi

Invite By friend . Liudmila Philipsova Vaahchenko

eBOor© * (relationship) ~ " (full MM) ••

/cienoHt poaciBt/ /nojsioe jam/ *

bom January it. -1957 •,

(full Cite I place of birth)

/»AIU Mil • uecro pojaexxa/

*

r

* •.»

• eltiienor the USSJt, now residing it: Ul. 20 Let. Khaxasll do. no.

rpiafiuosxt /rpmaaKxy/ CCCP, suite npoanBanaero BO aspecyi

g. Caernogorsk'l / Krasnoyarsk^ Kray R.S.F.S.B. / 667SPO IT.S.f!.B

vo visit (live'permanently) with me in the United Sum.

K cede B rocix /us noCTomKoe nxTeAUBo/ » CoeaHKeHioie lurtiii. ,

I an fully capable of supporting the above naned person, providing

fl lOICB BOUfOBHOCXB MBTepKBAXO OOeUWOITk BUieyKBSawfOt «U0a

for anyjeedlcal expenses, and guaranteeing living rusrtera during - ODJia;nT*3jsodiie UUMUKHCXMS paexoau K rapaHixpyB tauauosatoh BO

her (his) stay in ths United States, where she (he) will reside

Bpeufl npedUBaKHH B Coeuntcitmx Uh-aTox, TAB eyaei npoxxsaTk co anofl

Jill) BB Itl 100 Creeent Hill Drive / Selma. Alabama Viim I ir.s.t.

no aApaoyi •

t£c^ /jfJe.:

lUrai

v Petitioner's signaturs

DoAnHCB npOCHTBA*

• nM.IAS

ropoK *>pon• ; :ov .

19th Feb- -«

81 '

Buuscrltecl and sworn to before ns tills '_ day of 1»_r

(loAnMCBHO noA npHCsrofiifiioeu npiicyxciBUK • ' _ • ., • '

f• . . .• \r I J.'K. Williams ' ' . _ ••

''"•,"""•'. Hy Commission expires March 3, 1984 • Notary Public /Hoiapxyc/

i Subscribed and sworn to be for- p* this 19th day o£ Feb. 1981 ^v_. , . - .._.._^,.T_^_r.

^•commiJsi.n S^SSSSfK^^j^f^f^
48

2

INVITATION TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBEkS LISTED BELOW IN THE PETER VASHCHENKO FAMILY

1. Vaachenkoa in U.S. Embassy in Moacow

Peter Puvlovlch Vueohenko Ootober 30. 1926

Auguatina Vaailyevna Vaachenko March ^£"1929

Lilia Petrovna Vaachenko July 16, Vj'Ji .

Lidiu Petrovna Vuuohenko Muroh 6, 19!A "

Liubov Putrovnu Vuuohunko Uooumbor/Y» 1*J*}2

Embuuuy of Xho United Stati

o/o The Conaular Section.

19 Ulitaa Chaikovukogo

Moucow

U.U.LJ.K. 117234

2, Vmjohunkou ut Itoiuo in jjhurmuto£uk

•"•ml (In1nni-"1 nh "in ilnnlii T

.Nadezhda Petrovna Vaschenko

Vera Petrovna Vaachenko

Alexander Petrovloh Vaachenko

loan. Petrovich Vaachenko

Yukov Petrovloh Vuuohenko

JJinu Petrovna' Vuuohenko

Aval Petrovloh Vaachenko

Pavel Petrovich Vaachenko

Sarra Petrovna Vaachenko

Avraom Petrovloh Vaeohenko

1,r 8fl, IWfU J:J

i-iudmi It

&L^

AuguBt 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7 1959 •*• 2° L#t Khokaaii doa no

February 28, 1961 «• Ch.rnoeor«k 1

Muroh 9, 1962 Kra.noymr.ky Kray H.S.r.S.H.

April 30, I96:, U.S.S.B. 662620

May 1, I966

July 2, 1967 . !

Ootober 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

24

PU'tlipSOVQ. Va*bd,cn/fo Jan uary /£ US'?

fchK •

r«Jkr

<Jk«tf •

Clfy-

$•i,,~:l>J «*</*"*"> * **£••» "»**•'» •

My Conmission expires March 3, 1984

Hot*

Subscribed and sworn to before ne this 19th day of.Feb. 1S81. Myiy emission Conim expires 2/13/85

Notary>^Mr»* Public
No. J.?/.?90S.?.'.L

United &isi&s at Amerfcc

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

all to uijjom iijes? pror»2nis sljull ccm?, (Sreetmij:

: Certify 7'As.' iht document hereunto enncxed is under the Seol of the Stctc of:

j A labama * j

In tcutimonij iuljeri'cff/, ..WQl.tev...J.,...StQ.e&s&%,...t!&**

Acting

Secretary of Stale, have hereunto caused the seal of the DcparlActirxQ

mcnl of Stale to be affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer of the said Department, at the city of Washington, in

the District of CoUunbia. this &&}$£ -

dcy of . June 19Alt.

u^&xwzM QGJJJKVrJm4k^,m r^^tt^^ &

Un0 factor, ,f S&j*

AotZliy AiithjitUation Of.etr.tytpurln-.aA vf Stc.te.

\ca>e is not Calid if it is removed or altered in any Way ic!ia!so:0er.
50

•/

SEATE OFALABAMA

I, Don Siegelman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine.

In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31, 1981

Don Siegelman Secretary of State
51

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA, ALABAMA

3S70I

MIS* IDNA DURD1

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "Bill" Kynard Vj r
52

"btixjStSui 75551/ -.. .-.ii-ioii

J, the W»dW»lpitd Ceoll Williamson Jr.

* »«wwu»"iM"'ilui . Iruii M») /ncJ8W)>Mv

• eliiten (peraanent resident) of the United SUU) of Aiurcca

rpuauow /noeio/ouojH asrrcb/ Co&axMexnot littaTos Auepma, npxrji

Invite By friend Avraam Petrovich VaBhohenko

e

»

oero 1relationship) | (rulX naao)

/Heneiu poaciee/ /ncmoc tain/ •

bom April 8. 1974

"\

(full date E place of birth)

662620

. /njAKaji aaia • uecro pojaeiom/

V,^\V ~- .-. - •*• " '• ' •

• citizen of Ihe USSl, now residing at: "!• 20 Let.- Khakaail doa no. 24

rpajiaeioma /rpuatmy/ CCCP, same npouuuouero 5 upec/i "

g. Chernogorak 1 / KraanoyajBky Kray H.S.F.S.H. / U.S.S.R.

to Yisit (live'permanently) with tie in the United SUtes.

K cede a roeiH /«« noctomitoo SMTCACTBO/ • Coeuuieioais Bb-ixy. / /•

see- bac.A •

1 am fully capable of supporting the above naaed person, providing' ^

A .nick) aoutoraoci* *»TcpH«JO.H0 odecnewTk Buueyxasuoioe *tuo,

for «ny nedleal expenses, and guaranteeing living* r'usrters during • omiaTMk JotxSue ueAMUXHCKHS paexoau M rapaHnipyr ssubuioBaa* BO

her (his) stay in the United SUtes, where she (he) will reside

•poxx npaeuBaiuui B CoeAHHe>uaoc Kieinx, rae dyaex nposaaTs co lotoS

with su stt 100 Creaent Hill Drive /• Selma. Alabama ^6701 / ff.s.a.

no aapeeyj ' ' '

ly* * «'•'•"•

. - C£*y 6CL0&i~'S»•

v Petitioner's signature

floamick npocmejwi

gffi tmm ;

'<&m -

DAUAS

--. ••••••

rbpo}

, v^ . wv - . . ;

Subscribed end sworn to before no this \ •

19th dsr of Feb

- 19^'

JloAimeaHO Pol npncnroft-w asMat npiicyrciBiui /*•:"• '' """'

"V My" Commission expires 'March 3, 1984 V

J

' "• wllUam3 •' •

. .• . , * ,. .Notary Public /MoiapHye/

[ Subscribed and sworn to before mo this 19th day of Fcb, 19jf

My fcoi.i..ion TS&sSnssnsrmS''r~~l "T^l&xxsxry-**-* r •••?-•*
53

f

INVITATION TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IN THE PETEH VASHCHENKO FAJOLT

I. Vaachenlcoa in U.S. Embassy in Moo cow

Peter Puvlovioh Vuuohunko Octobur 30^1926

Augustina Vaullyevna Vuuohunko March -&~±\)V\j

Lilia Petrovna Vaachenko July 16, l'j'j'i

Lidia Petrovna Vusohenko Maroh 6, I'j'jl

Liubov Petrovna Vuuohunko Docuaibur/7, l.v>-

2* Vaachenkoa at home in Chernof^orek

HUIB1 Unl l*h Vuui.UuilHu ilulj Ql, iBMU

Nadeehda Petrovna Vaaohenko

Vera Petrovna Vaaohenko

Alexander Petrovich Vaaohenko

loan. Petrovich Vaaohenko

Yukov Patrovloh Vuuohunko

Dinu Putrovnu Vuuohunko

Avel Petrovioh Vaaohenko

Pavel Petrovich Vaaohenko

Sarra Petrovna Vaaohenko

Avraan Petrovioh Vaaohenko

Auguat 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 1959

Kiubuuuy of tko United Stu

0/0 The Coneular Seotioa

19 Ulitaa Ghaikovekogo

Moucow

u.a.a.K. 117234

iuT

Ul. 20 Lot Khaka.ii don no.

February 2B, 1961 «• Ch.rnogor.lc 1

Muroh 9. 1962

Ai>rll 30, lyo^

Hay 1, ly66

July 2, 1967

Ootober 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

Kra.noyar.ky Kray H.S.F.S.R.

U.S.S.B. 662620

liudm'iU CWAi^soyio.VaihcU^nKo January43,IIS^

SMbt

Cain fy •

CLtf•

J

SubicrikcJ a*J'Sluovn To before. ,»»«, TAi's oltyol- .j't*•'

Hy Comnission'expires March 3, 1984 yju^f•/.(AY\/ci~arf Pulsh't

Sub.crlbed and sworn to befoto me this 19th day of Fetu 1981 /
54

No. .?.U?909g'

V

jzft States o-? Atttsrmi

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

In all to mijom Sljeac jn-Eseiiia sljall tome, (greeting:

i Certify Thai the document hereunto annexed is under the Seal of the Slate oj:

[ Alabama*

tn trotimctiy lulicrraf, /. Villtitr i, tttHUf*%i -

b

*u

Secretory oj Stale, have hereunto coined the seal oj the DepartActing

menl oj Stale to he affixed and my name subscribed by the Aullicnlicelion Officer oj Ihc said Department, at the city oj Washington, in

the District oj Columbia, this *iSl&. .*.

day oj dune , 19 SI.

Dtj Akha-.licdioi, O^.cY, Dtparbmrt of Stctt,

nt.si'OusiniJiry' j

Aciiii'j

male is not Calitl ij il is rcmv.id or rMcrcff in ant/ u'uy wht&SOCtCt.
55

Ox'JiiGL'iJ" ^

SuATE OF /VLABAM A A

I, Don Siegelman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine.

In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31. 1981

Don Siegelman Secretary ofState
56

WILLIAM A. KVNAMO

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

36701

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "Bill" Kynard > (^ ^
57

feSuriKaTTBBS/ eM.£909*J

X, the undirsiened Ceoil Millianaon Jr.

«, SMenoanxeeaanifcS' • (fullMiu; /noame nV

• cltlttn (ceraanent resident) of th« United Sut«i of Aaeraca

lyiMtwm /noCTo/wmifl sure*./ Goauniexnac CtteTO* Atttpma, qpar<i

Invite "gy friend Sarra Petrovna Vaahohanko

•aoaro (relationship) "~ *"~ (full nsaoj• "

/creaeH* poacxsa/ /ausni nV

bom Ootober 9. 1970 •

(full Sate I place of birth;

/OOWM SITS • users poajeiom/

\ • \ * •

• eltlaenVoTth* 05511. now rssldlns st: "*• » j*»; Khakaaii dom no. 24

rpiwAimma /rpeKasxir// CCCP, avwe npoaMsanwro as aapscyi.

g. Charnogoralc "1 / Kraanoyaraky Kray B.S.F.S.R. / 662620 U.S.S.a.

vo visit (livs'pcroanently) with M In the United SUtes. •

a act* a reeiH /«a nocroxHxeo jottejacieo/ a CoeAxxeioaie Brsm.

J in fully capable of supporting the above named person, providing

A JOICB souioaMOCTa *STepHajQ»KO ooocnevHTa Binieyxaaajotoe «cio, / ' /^

for any swdlesl expenses, and guaranteeing living" quarters during -

cn-MTKia jso6ut MeAmntHCKHe paexoau a rapaHiqiys aouawouiaa* ao

her (hie) stay In the United States, where she (he) will reside

apeua npeduaiuM a CoeAKHeHmtx Un-arai, rae oyaei npoKxsaxk co wiofl

with ms atl IOO Creaant Hill Drive / Selma, Alabama 36701 / U.S.A.

no aapscyi •

• *

I

i Petitioner's signstara

Doanxck npocuTKm

8UU JUrai"

"feSBfr • amtf

City'" SELMA

rbseB apM"

19th . _. -. Feb. •»' Subscribed and sworn to before oe thla Uth day of, , i°_».

tloAnaeaao noA npHearoll-tcaoea MrMai •' -•'"

: t My soasasslon-explres March 3, 1984 h. M. Williams

* ^VftlilJtJk**

Ascribed this 19th day of Feb and sworn to before m this "thjjy oi^.-..^-^

SfxoaataSSlB5SS«inSe5**^ y/V '^ vJji-.

NoUry Public /HoiapKyc/
f

INVITATION TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELON IN THE PETER VASHCHENKO PAMILT

1. Vaachenkoo In U.S. EmbaBay in MOBcow

Fetor Puvlovioh Vuuohonko October 30. 1'jdG Enibuuuy. of the United Sta

Augustine Vuuilyevnu Vaeobunko Murch <^T.y29 o/o Thy Consular Section.

Lilia Petrovna Vaaobenko July 16, Vj'/l 19 Ulitaa ChaiJcovakogo

Lidia Petrovna Vuaohenko Murob 6, ly^l Moucow

Liubov Petrovna Vuuobenko Docunibur/7» 19J»2 U.ii.ii.U, 117234

/vT" 2. Vaaohenkoa at home in Chernofforak

Puiui mutuiiuijili Hiiiimlil llulj CU) mUUO '

Nadozhda Petrovna Vasohenko August 7» 1954

Vera Petrovna Vasohenko April 25i 1956

Alexander Petrovioh Vaaobenko April 7, 1959 U1*.20 ** KhakMl1 do"

n0*

loan. Petrovioh Vaaohenko February 2fl, 1961 «• Chernogorsk 1

Yukov Petrovioh Vuuohunko Muroh y, 1%2 Krasnoyarsk* Kray H.s.P.S.H.

Dinu Petrovna Vuuobenko April 30, 1'jG'j U.S.S.H. 662620

Avel Petrovioh Vaaohenko May 1, I966

Pavel Petrovioh Vaaohenko July 2, 1967

Sarra Petrovna Vaaohenko October 9, 1970

Avraam Petrovioh Vasohenko April 8, 1974

,^U ALABAMA "«/>/?Ofte.*4 $7« naflir-*> ii^ ^

DALLAS

SELMA

(j y "My Commission expires March 3, 1984

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of Feb. 1981. My Commission expire. 2/13/85
§&t&ig& of America

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

all fa uiljom tijese presents sljntl came, firetiing:

^rilfij J"AsJ (Ac document hereunto annexed is under the Seal of the State of:

in tcoiimcmi mlpcreaf, /, ffirttflW if* ffftflMMHWftj JrMJ

Secretary of State, hate hereunto caused the seal of the DcparlActing

ment of Stale to be affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer of the said Department, at the city of Washington, in

the District of Columbia, this ?»?}.&. ;.

day of . June t J9 81.

i'lOH 1M COKtCMn on int *MN:-.fUi urs.\;mtit\

nit UtPAflTNi.llTAS'.'.IHESI NO kUPOMIHUTV '

Acting ttttg /IWAwifiCGdon OrfirJ/. Dcpattrr.ad of Stc.tt.

• is not catid if it is remoicd or altered in any iCay icha!so:Per.
60

ju'jSObsH

s-TATE OFA/VLABAMA

I, Don Siegelman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge, information

and belief, genuineIn Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31, 1981

Don Siegelman Secretary of State
61

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

3670!

Mill CONA DUHOIN

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "Bill" KynarSM
62

TwrxuiSm /atoos/

aj.'JiiGS<j

J, the wder*lmed Cooll W1I i tumoon Jr.

fl, •aounoAnxcaaaKflcA ; (full D*IM) /OMXOO nV

• cltlten (peraanent resident) of the United State* of Minn

UpMBMQOI /nociodmail! tmt/im/ COUJKCKKUX Ctratos Aucpaxu, npxrji

invite By friend Pavel Petrovich Vasbchenko

••oero TraSHonshlpl (full SMT

/CTCDeKa POACTM/ /Datum* wv

torn July 2. 1967

(full date I place of birth}

-3

/noAtui JUTt M IMCTO pOK3eiW*\/

*• ••

• eltiten of the USSH, now residing it: in. ?o i,Bt. JBatMU H"" 3f- M

rpuuuouuk /rsuiaijao// CCGEi-mw-jpoiotsuuero ao-acpecyi.

|«, ChurnororBk 1 / Kraanoyarnky Kray H.S.t'.S.R. / 662620 U.S.S.B.

to visit (live'permanently) with ne in the United State*.

K cede B rocm /M* RoeromHoo mBACiM/ • CoeoHHexiaie Bran.

Z in fully capable of supporting the above named peraon, providing

H.mieiD eouioaatocTa waTepHaJo»Ho ooecne^hra euueyicasaiufoe MOID,

SOT any nedlcal expenses, and guaranteeing living" quarter* during

omiaTUTa Jxiut ueamoiKCKHo paexoou u repamiipyD aausu»uad> »o

her (hii/ stay in the United States, where ahe (he) will reaide

apeK* npedisamui • CoeAKHewaiX liraioa, rae dyaer nporasaia co aotoa

With Be atl 100 Creaent Hill Drive / Selma. Alabama ^6701 / U.S.A.

Bo «4pecyi

State ALABAMA lb*, 0M!S

PALLAS

v Petitioner1* signature

Doanwck npocHieJM

City SELMA • j ; .

">PM ! 157 . -

. 19th . -*eb. •

81'

• o

Subscribed and evorn to before ne thi* day Of a W_»

JloAnneauo noA npiienroB-* men npiicyrciowt '«

v ntx.'''.'•••• . --, - ^)y^\jjLiM^m^-

-/V'MV CoMnlssloa expire. March 3, 1984 j/M. v/llllams -• .^.,

i>\ Notary Public /UoxapHyc/

T^cr'lbed Sd^TtTgaSSTJ.^i^^rJay »^t9W^^-*^««?fT^
63

INVITATION TO EMIGRATE SENT TO AIL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IN THE FETES VA3HCHENK0 FAMILT

1* Vasohenkos In U.S. Embaaay in MOBOOW

Peter Puvlovioh Vaaohanko October 30. 1926

Auguetina Vaeilyevna Vaaohunko

Lilia Fetrovna Vaechenko

Lidia Fetrovna Vaaohenko

Liubov Fetrovna Vaaohenko

March *f1929

July 16, 1957

March 6, 1951

Docombur/Y, 191)2

Enbuuuy of the United Stat<

o/o The Coneular Section.

19 Ulitaa Coaikovakogo

Moacov

U.ti.li.H. 117234

2. Vaoohonkoa at hoinc in Chornof/oruk

Paj»il totonev-tsJi VuBLUmiKu

Nadozhda Fetrovna Vaaohenko

Vera Fetrovna Vauohonko

Alexander Fetrovich Vaaohenko

loan. Fetrovich Vaaohenko

Yukov Fetrovich Vauohonko

Dinu Fetrovna Vauohenko

Avel Fetrovich Vaachenko

Favel Fetrovich Vaachenko

Sarra Fetrovna Vaaohenko

Avraom Fetrovioh Vaaohenko

Liuelm! le

Tuiji nij| iniin•

Auguut 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 1959

February 28, 1961

March 9, 1962

April 30, 1965

May 1, 1966

July 2, 1967

Ootober 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

J»T

Ul. 20 Let Khakasll dom no. 24

g. Cheraogorsk 1

Xraenoyarsky Kray B.S.F.S.B.

U.S.S.H. 662620

rhiliftom VatbcJi en/fo Jan uaryJ3,/7Sy

6oLe&.;

Cciih'or'*-*' is'^unaTttr

Sti*

CmmMJk DAUAS term If

f.'ff SETMA

JtitcfitcJ anjiwornto bet*

Ijfcfl My Commission expires March 3, 1984

»l»e- m c

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of Fab, 1981 /Votary fulfil*

*$ CoosviMicra expires 2/13/85 k^». .Vfay^.^.B
64

No. ..

8K?.?°.

•Hnftcii §&lni2&

9

of

.

America

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

la all ta m!;om il;ese presents sljnU ccme, ©resting:

I J Certify JTia' Ms document hereunto annexed is under the Seal of the Stele of:

j Alabama* }

riiii

In tcotimony lulicri'cf, /, ...VaUev..J.*..S.t{?g&a&l*..Jzu*

Acting

Secretary of Stale, hace hereunto caused the seal of the DepartActing

menl of Slate to he affixed and my name stihscribed hy the Authentication Officer of lite said Department, at the city of Washington, in

the District of Coliunhia. this *»»?£** _ ;.

day of !*«« 19M.

{•tOlt TMF COMTEl

TIIL *:i'«'m.o at/.

Tlh. Ill ftinHi NT ASMiUtS

NO hLWONMIML

Acting AiKknthation Oficil/Dtpuiln'.tnt i,J Slc.U.

Me is not valid if U is icinoCai or tillered in any iCuy idiaisocfsr.
65

cix'JUOiiii'^

SE

I, Don Sicgelman,

ATEOF/iJABAMA

Secretary

A

of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State, that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuineIn Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31. 1981

Don V-in Siegelman \UoMMBn *"*^ S*»rrv>r; Secretary of State
OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

5ELMA, ALABAMA •..* HBH< •*..•».»» WILLIAM A. KYNAND **** ION* BURDEN

GUJM«NOM«lfM 36701 OWWTY tUNI *NO •MMRH

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "Bill" Kynardl UT
67

•fXffMmWL /BU30B/

' t. the underslmed MI mn)»..m jr:

• eititen (peraanent resident) of the United States of Mtin

rpaxuwoi /nocTOKXKwH tone**/ Cbeiuoieneax Eb-eToa Axepam, npxrj«

lnviteW frland Aval Pata-ovlch Va.hghanko

ooero (relationship) (full naae)

/ereaeKk poacTB»/ /nemo* taw/ •

sicaotia

.4

>«>"> Hav. 1. Ijg __

• (full fit* * place of birth)

/noJKtii tin a KecTO poaaemv 24

• eititen of the USSn. now residing attl. 20 Let. Khakaall don n». PA

rp»Kauoui4\/fp«jui»iwy/ CCCP, «uiiejtipoiBa*nuere no «flpee/i ••

, g. Chernogorafc 1 / Krasnoyarsk? Kray R.S.P.S.R. / 662620 P.S.S.R.

to visit (live'permanently) with Be in the United States.

a eeoe > roc• /K* nonoaxrae sneARio/ a CoeutHexnie Brani.

Z an fully cspeble of supporting the stove named person, providing

A MHCB aouioaHoeTk mtepHSjaxo odecnevjtrk auueyxasamoe jmuo,

• " /• *-

for any Bedieal expenses, and guaranteeing living" charters during -

5ff__ff_^

on«T«x» j»5we yejiHiotKMwe paexoau a rapaHiMpys aoumaoioia. ao

her (his) stay in the United States, where she (he) will reside

apex* npedkzaxxa a Coeflmemonc Un-erax, rae dyaeT npos»a» ca wioB

With me atl 100 Creeent Hill Drive /-Selma, Alabama 36701 / U.S.A.

no aapeeyi , " """

\ Petitioner's signature

Doarmck npocHteJw

Brax

tor-•

Ibpoj ipojr

-Beb. ..81' jlay of . W_»

JJoAnxeaHO no4 npxearoil-B noea npneyTciBMa

%*•'•--' • '•' -Cf- '••>'; J-i/J. M, Vllllama ' •

r

r " •..' -*" 5 ^-' -'-."l; : Notary Public /HoiapHyc/

-My Commission exD>«s PebVuary 13,. 1985 Vja^VjSjgM

.'•-.. •-.'"• • Motary Public
INVITATICH TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BSLOi" IX THE FETES VA3HCHEJUCO FAMILT

1* VaeohenkOB In U.S. Embasay in MOBOOW

Pater Pavlovioh Vaaohenko Ootober 30^1926

Auguatlna Vaailyevna Vaaohenko Marob. «97^929

Lilia Fstrovna Vaaohenko July 16, 1957

Lidla Fetrovna Vaaohanko Moron 6, 1951

Llubov Fetrovna Vaaohanko Documbor/7, 1952

Embaauy of the United Sta

o/o Tba Consular Saotion

19 Ulitaa-Saalkovakogo

Moaoov

U.S.S.B. 117234

2* VasohenkoB at home in Charno/^aruk

Pa Hi a»iUuuulluU TUMUilUULU

Nadezhda Fetrovna Vaaohanko

Vara Fetrovna Vaaohanko

Alexander Fetrovlcb Vaaohenko

loan Fetrovioh Vaaohenko

Yakov Fetrovioh Vuuohonko

Dinu Fetrovna Vauohanko

Aval Fetrovioh Vaaohenko

Favel Fetrovioh Vaaohenko

Sarra Fetrovna Vaaohanko

Avraam Fetrovioh Vaaohenko

niuljl 1U, IUUU

August 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 1959

February 28, 1961

Maroh 9, 1962

Aiirll 30, 196;>

May 1, 1966

July 2, 1967

Ootober 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

/aV"

Ul. 20 Let Khakaaii dom no.

g. Charnogorek 1

Kraanoyaraky Kray R.S.F.S.B.

U.S.S.H. 662620

Liu.dmi la

S&L.

CWAifSova.

Ct^iV<or>e.*'i ilqntture*

s- J. DALLAS fnvnljf •

«*•

5«i»M>fW »*J **••••» t» Ufo?* *>* TV';1• Jiffy tf**lj#2L

Subscribed and svom to before me this 19th day of Feb."1981

My commission expires Feb 13, 1905 . V\ \< 0

AofarvPnUi^
No. ..

81

/.?909r*

Mnilgii States of Attuerlca

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

all ia luijam il;eae presents BljaU reme, ©reeling:

Certify 77ia4' /A: document hereunto annexed is under the Seal of the Stole oj:

Alabama* !

in testimony nitycri'nf, 7, , MaltdBT j* StO^UM^-t -ftf-j

Secretary of State, hace hereunto caused the seal of the DepartActing

mcnl of Stale to he affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer of the said Department, ol the city of Washington, in

the District of Columbia, this *»»Ifl!8 I

day of iHBt. I9M:.

(""•SISSS"'^'') filing &•,,•• cfS,,.,/V

nuT\^Vr^, 1Jb^kk Actinytf AutluAleutian OJitiJLflcpjittT.tr.t ./ Str.U.

i not Valid ij it is removed or tillered in any u-mj VtnObtKtSt,

<*r>.
70

6i.'J9Q9y'*

SE

I, Don Siegelman,

ATE

Secretary

OF/ALABAMA A

of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine*

In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31, 1981

Don Siegelman Secretary otSoae | t£f
71

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

36701

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "Bill" Kynai&J *"
72

INVITATIOB TO EMIGRATE SENT, TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IV THE PETER VASHCHEMKO FAMILY

1. Vaaohenkoo in U.S. Embauuy in Moucow

Peter Pavlovioh Vaeohenko Octobur 30.1926

Auguotina Vaailvevna Vaoehunko March "&$*iy29

Liliu Petrovna Vuoohenko July 16, lV'j'l

Lidiu Petrovnu Vuaohenko Moron 6, VJ'jX

Liubov Petrovna Vuaohenko jJocombor/ 7, iy;>2

Entbuuuy of the United Sta

o/o The Consular Section,

19 Uliteo Choikovekogo

Moucow

U.S.U.H. 117234

2. Vaschenkos at home in Cherno;^oruk

^ 1 "* '1 *-nnir1nh V"-**'"*"'•

Nad'eahda Petrovna Vaschenko

Vera Petrovna Vaschenko

Alexander Petrovioh Vaschenko

loan. Petrovioh Vaeohenko

Yukov Petrovioh Vuuohonko

Dinu Petrovnu Vuuohunko

Avel Petrovioh Vasohenko

Pavel Petrovioh Vaeohenko

Sarra Petrovna Vasohenko

Avraam Petrovioh Vaachenko

dijji IJB)' 1UCJT" JuT August 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 1959

February 28, 1961

Muroh 9, 1962

April JO, ly6!>

May 1, 11/66

July 2, 1967

October 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

Ul. 20 Lot Khakaaii doa no.

g. Chernogorsk 1

Kraanoyarsky Kray a.S.P.S.E.

U.S.S.R. 662620

LiuJmila ?l»tifS<MmV*tf,c/i*»fi, Januarv/3,/fS'?

ft'1r ALABAMA

CcHrty

My Commission expir.es Marche 3, 1984

Subscribed and sworn to before ne this 19th day of Feb, 1981

My Conanission expires 2/13/85 , 4 v.

<

J flofirf Public

, 1981 /
73

6i'J909y 3

tthe mimlp** Ml Winiam.on Jr.

a, •n•itiMiUES (ft.n B5aj

«s ef Ansrici

IfW /oeciommlt nue*/ Ooumcnoa ClttTo* Ampmoj, spur,

• cilltin (pensnent resident) of the United States ef MMrlce

; /nocTomxult xyntJt*/

JtHJU «g friend • Pint Pstrnvna V.nhoh.rlm

(relationship) (lull naae)

/CTtn.Kk poacrea/ /no-otoe saui/

*«»n April yt 1?6'; r,

(full date * piece of birth)

fnomxK uti • Macro posaemv ,

•' *

• eltltenof the USSR, now residing tti Ul. 20 Lgt. KhaJcaali dom no1 2a

rpujauooiX/rpuauwy/ CCCP, same npoaxsaaaero so aspec/i __~«.

g. Chernogorsk 1 / Krasnoyarsk^ Kray R.S.F.S.B. / 662620 U.S.S.E.

to visit (llve'pcroanentlr) with Be In the United Sum.

x cede » rociH /»» nocxejoutoe axTeAcrao/ • CeeaxxeMKue Brazil.

X an fully capable of supporting the above nmed person; providing

II we* BounsMocik MHepxajD>xo odecnexxxk BuueyxasaxKoa Jofua, / -,

for any aedleal expenses, end guaranteeing living Quarters during - -^

oiuaTjRk oodiie ueaxuxHCXHe paexow x rapaninpyi> aousiaouaaa so *

her (his) stay in the United States, where she (he) will reside

apex* npedusaiuM a CoeaKxaxxux Uh-aTox, rae dyaeT npo»»ax> co aotofl

with an atl loo a-BHBnt mil Pri• / a.in,«. ti.h.n,. \fnen I n.s.i. .

no *wp©cyi

&U. 6aM. £2•ife>~-~

State ffirai

i Fetitioner'a signature

DoAnxcfc npocnaju

rbpol ipoJJ • • ' :ov • •_ .

Wbsertbed and aworn to before en thle '• ****• daw of Feb- 1»fi»'

HoAnncano nod npxc/rotl-K xoeu qpiieyTCraxa

J. H. Williams

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19?°"$ oF feb!r1flry,.*95SV

K&XprWj!.2/»;r»3 £*"*

Notary .Public VJ
74

fj• 81/09099''

Hmtsik Pistes of Americ:a

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

la all in luljam tljese prccenfa sljaU come, ©reeling:

r^rtiftj That the document hereunto annexed is under the Seal of the State oj:

A labajna * j

in tcatimaiiij iul;cwnf, /. ...Hal.t.e.r...rf*_.StBgs.s&l±.Jr.,

Acting

Secretary oj State, have hereunto caused the seal of the DcparlActing

menl of State to be affixed and my name stilscribcd by the Aulhcntication Officer of the said Department, at the city of Washington, in

the District of Columbia, this *«?.?/*?? _ ;.

day of . 19M:

(^raiasresaffl^.cdhs\- rM^o^Jh

^Y^cp-ytvcoO. IWiAciiirj AulkotUtc'.ion Ojv:crt l)<puttn:tnl vf 5tctt.

: is nol Calirf ij ii ft removed or alttftd in any Way u'ltdio.-flcr.
75

Si'-SOsy-^

S

I, Don

TATE

Siegelman, Secretary

OF/ALABAMA A

of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kytiard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine.

In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31, 1981

YzJr?^•AtSLs-JpM*-*^

Don Siegelman Secretary of State
76

I A. KVMARO

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

367Q1

Ilia IONA DURDIN

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

V^.X.'^W.Vi

W. A. "Bill" Kynar.
77

terXuSaTTSoS/ ftiiMj(J9H Jt

I, the undersicned Cecil Williamson Jr.

a, BnenoonMCuwutc* | (full Basel /nojwoe BV

a dtlten (cersanent resident) of the United State! of /usance

rpaxaajocx /BOCTOSMOIII mnt*/ Ooeumenwx CttaTos Auepmoi, npwji

invite BQT friend Yakov P«trovich Vaabchenko

CBoero (relationship) (full naae)

/CTeaeiia pcaciaa/ /no-moe tout/

born March 9. 196?

(full date I place of birth)

/novwaa air a a MCCTO poiunv

• citizenof the USSR, «>ow reaiding it: PI 20 Let. Khalcasli don no. 9a

rpamatKMKl /rps-naaiixy/ CCEP, BUHO nposauiaxuero no aapecyi.

g. Chernogoralc i/ Kraenoyareky Kray R.S.F.S.R. / 662620 U.S.S.R.

to viait (lire'permanently) with ne in the United State*.

K cede B I-OCTM /*a noCTOfoixoo soneACTBo/ • CoeaxHeHieue Bbam.

I an fully capable of supporting the above named person, providing

II KMC» BOSMOKHOCII miepHsvuHo ofiecneiXTii auieyxasaiMoe XKUH, * / -,

tor any aedlcal expenses, and guaranteeing living" quarters during - ±

©DvaTnik A>oiie ue/unsiKcxMe paexoau x r*paHTKpy» souiuouaa*. BO "^

her (his) stay in the United States, where she (he) will reside

Bpsua npefiusaiuM B CoeAKMexmx UiraTojt, rae dyaei nposMsais co anoS

Vitll BB atl 100 Creaent Hill Drive / SBlma. Alabama ^6701 / rf.g-.i.

no aapecyi

&<jf £&£i

State)

JUrai-

» Petitioner'* signature

DoAimek npocmeJM

fopoj >PWT ,:ov

Subscribe* and sworn to before ne this *• **** «M of Feb- " . lj*ip"

JIoAnMcaHo noa npKCnroh-wnoeu npiicyrciBMii f .. ' + ••••',

.! My Connisslon-expires March 3, 1984 J J. M. Williams

r

^-'-" "v « _-,•» 10A, d.vMoUrjr Public /HoranKye/ Subscribed and sworn to before ue this 19th dayo£ ?eb» 1981 «.

TFy-C^a3aCT5rMpnrrei'.WoTa«y--»jr-19(rt ~. •• "T"**?'"* ** * *"
78

IHVITATIOH TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IN THE PETER VASHCHENKO PAMILT

1. Vaachenkos in U.S. Embaesy in MOBcow

Pater Pavlovich Vaachenko October 30. 1926

Auguatina Vasilyevna Vaachenko March "3ftyri.929

Lilia Petrovna Vaachenko July 16, 1957

Lidia Petrovna Vaachenko March 6, 1951

Liubov Petrovna Vasohenko December/7, 1952

Embaeuy of the United Stat'

o/o The Consular Seotion.

19 Ulitea-Chaikovakogo

MOBcow

U.S.S.H. 117234

2. Vaachenkoa at home in Chernoftorak

Ba»el Aa*onoYioh Vimohonieo dcrij EO, 1Q0&'

Nadeehda Petrovna Vaachenko August 7, 19^4

Vera Petrovna Vaachenko April 25, 1956

Alexander Petrovich Vasohenko April 7, 1959

loan. Petrovich Vasohenko February 28, 1961

Yukov Petrovich Vuuohunko Muroh 9, 1962

Dina Potrovnu Vuuohunko April 30, 1965

Avel Petrovich Vaachenko May 1, I966

Pavel Petrovich Vaachenko July 2, 1967

Sarra Petrovna Vaachenko October 9, 1970

Avraam Petrovich Vaachenko April 8, 1974

JU.

Ola 20 Let Khakasil dom no. 24

g. Chernogoralc 1

Krasnoyarsk; Kray H.S.F.S.H.

U.S.S.R. 662620

Liudmlla Chlli^sova. l4sA^e»/ti, J*n uat>y 13, l<?£y

fe.f'tond s 'V"•*>••• r

ZtaLdrnunt* '

f

^

< b**«i%*J **J *•*>•** ^o leTore^ /tte^T^/sJ^LJy'fJ-'^--

-. Hy Commission expires March 3, 1984 :. ,

Subscribed and sworn to tafetVal Jbli »* day of ^ fleT"/

Feb, 1981. My Commission expires 2/13/85 'y^,^ \\»L&as4

5Wy rW*
79

No. 81/09099'

>h £s>lrdss of Amtrtra

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

nil fa liiijom il;ese presents sljnll come, ©reeling:

iS.ttfy 7 Aflf flu document hereunto annexed is under the Seal of the State of:

j Alabama* \

In U-otimcny luljcrtnt, /, _...fe?.£er.(L...£t«e.aaeU..•&•...,

Acting

Secretary of State, hate hereunto coined the seal of the DcparlActing

menl of State to be affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer of the said Department, at the city of Washington, in

the District of Columbia, this *£(£t& .\

day of i!*SS. 19.8.1:.

Actin'n Aut\tnU<ution Ojnu-rtf)cpurtrr.<r>t of S(c.U.

i 15 not Mua ij it is remold! or altered in any u'uy whatsoever.
80

Svjsoaa-1

STATE OFALARAMA

I, Don Siegelman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine.

In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

Don Siegelman Secretary ofState
81

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

38701

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "Bill" Kynard \\ •"
82

K BnenaamcaaaKJlca:\ (fun aaae) /hnaino »V

• cltlxen (neraanent resident) of the United States of wnn

rpauuocx /nocTommll tacit**/ Ooeuoieiaost UrtTOS Auepxm, optovi

Invite py friend • loan Petrovich Vaahchenlco

(relationship) (full Mae)

/cTenexh poacras/ /no/woe KMV

bom February 28. 1961 '.

(full date S piece of birth) ' .

/nowu A»n • MCCTO poauesxa/

\ • \ ' '

• eltlten of •V*\U5STt, «ew residing ati U1.-2Q Khahaell~d6» no. 2a

rpaaaamuia /rpaacaajtxy/ CCCP, auxe npoeneaauero ao aspecyi,

a> Chernogorak 1 / Kraanoyaraky Kray R.S.F.S.R. / 662620 U.S.3.B.

to visit (llve'pcrmanently) with ae In the united States.

x cede a rona /«» nocToawios aotie.in.weo/ a 0»uuuiexKue Sa-ani.

J am fully capable of supporting the above named person/ providing

H .aaea aowoaxocTa aaTepKtAMO odecnemna auaeyxaaajaioe «nio, ' / A'

for any aedieal expenses, and guaranteeing living" quarters during - > •» 7

OBMTXTk Mtm uuunotHcxHe paexoou a rapaHTMpyo aMouoaaas ao

bar (his) stay In the United States, where she (he) will reside

' apeaa npeduaaaiui a GouumaHMa ttrariuc, rae dyaeT npomsatt to ami

Vith aa atl lOO Creaent H1U Briv. / S.1-.. Al.h.m. 167m I ll.R.i.

no aapecyj

fttata_

\ Petitioner's signature

Doomtca npocBie*!

V - DALLAS

feS&r*-•

•apo* . .^v : -.'•"•

.'....:. Subscribed end sworn to before ae this •'•?th day of, Feb' liH.'

•< rio/uwcaHo noa npacnroB-v xoea nptieyrcTaaa f. .. ~^»."

_,. . "V CoBBisslon\ expires March 3, 1984 ?'|£-vjj M.:WilUams-••. . - '• ' :

i j ^ .-<;. .ri- ~c- - Notary Public /hoTapHyc/"^""^^ ; J^.-

t':' •":JsuV*rlb,J iw s!'°":y_^Kf.JS.'i1'-.~42$rydJly-°£.r%-.n-l..a^1.r.'?'ii'i

, • HyCojaJaaion ixplres'Tebltuairy 13,..19A< . 1 v J . " •* ••

''•••• . Notarv Pt.hl »".- '•V)
83

INVITATION TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEKBEHS LISTED BELOW IN THE PETER VASHCHENKO FAMILT

Vaschenkoa in U.S. Embassy in Moscow

Pater Pavlovich Vaoohonko Ootobor 30^J.926

AuguBtina Vaeilyevna Vaschenko March &? 1929

Lilia Petrovna Vaschenko July 16, i'j'/i

Lidia Petrovna Vaschenko March 6, 19!)1

Liubov Potrovna Vuuohonko Doconibur/7» X'J'j2

Embuuuy of tha United Stat

c/o The Consular Section

19 UlitaaChalkovskogo

Moscow

U.U.li.H. 117234

2» Vaachenkoa at home in Chorno^rBk

I'mMl AlUUllUlJuli Viai.ni.lni jmkj Q0| MHM

Nadezhda Petrovna Vaschenko

Vera Petrovna Vaschenko

Alexander Petrovich Vasohenko

loan Petrovich Vuuohonko

Yukov Potrovioh Vuuohonko

Dinu Petrovna Vuuchunko

Avel Petrovich Vaschunko

Pavel Petrovich Vaschenko

Sarra Petrovna Vaschenko

Avraan Petrovich Vaschenko

J/U

Liujmila fifji't

August 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 1959

February 2fl, 1961

Huron 9. 1962 '

Ajiril 3U, 1965

Kay 1, 1966

July 2, 1967

Ootobor 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

Ul. 20 Lot Xh&kAail don no. 2

p. Chernogorsk 1

Krasnoyareky Kray H.S.F.S.R.

U.S.S.R. 662620

ifSova UttfuAe*Ko Jan uary 1\I1S*?

till &sJe.-<

5i*1*

f+TiTipners S'£.n*~fur<* T

Ceur\% '•rv-

$*\,*<»;1**J*»J***** to before **» t&S 'yj*^, ffjL.

MY Commission expires March 3, 1984

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of Feb.1981 My co«m*asion iion expires 2/13/85
84

No $1/09099*

Mmizh g&tniss of ikm&rh

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Jail ia luijom i^eae presents sljall come, ©reeling:

Zcxtiilt That the document hereunto annexed is under the Seal oj the Stctc oj:

Alabama*

in testimony luljtri'of, /, ...#«I.£er?..iL...£fa?.es.Sfii>..Vr...,

Acting

Secretary oj Stale, hate hereunto caused the seal of the DepartActing

mcnl oj Stale to he affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer oj the said Department, ai the city oj Washington, in

the District oj Columbia, this tSfifdi .'.

day oj . June I9..U:.

Aathlfj Ai\hnstko(ion OfU, Department of StcU.

\calc is not Oalii! ij it is removed or all.-red in any u-u;/ ichalsocccr.
85

axiiiX)i}ii'

STATE OF XJL /YLABAMA

I, Don Siegelman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine.

In Testimony Whereof, 1 have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal ofthe

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31, 1981

Don Siegelman Secretary of State
86

WILLIAM A KYNARO

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

3«701

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

.. ''Bill" Kynard,V\ '

\.
87

S, the Bndersinttd' Cecil Willlaaaon Jr.

R, mzenMnMcuaMScA \ (full naise) /DOJMM »V

• citiren (peraanent resident) of the United State* of MMriea

rp&uuoot /nocTomKuH torttxmf Coeoxxexnoi CtraTO* JUicpnoi, npxraaB

4

Invite *tr/ friend . Alexander Potrovloh Vaehohenko

**oero (relationship) (full naae)

/cTeneiu poaciee/ /nomat torn/

born April 7. 1959

(full date E place of birth)

/nMH?a«T..««.pc«.»uV

• eiUxen oflhf-USSn, new residing Hi ML. 20 Let. Khakaell dog no. 24

rputaaioiHa /rpaxaawqr/ CCCP, mm* npoxxsuuero Bo aapecyi.

g. Chernogoreli-j / Krasnoyarsk Kray H.S.F.S.R. / 662620 U.S.3.R.

to Tlelt (live'peraanently) with « In the united States.

K cede a roetH /«» RoCTomHoe axTCACTSo/ • CoeoMxeiuoio Erem.

Z am fully capable of supporting the above neaed person, providing

fl.imc» >oiuoa»oeTk naTepiuuaiHO odeenevXTk Bimeyiiasaio»e AXUO, • / A,

for any Medical expenses, and guaranteeing living quarters during - i

oiuiaTMTk Aoeue ueaHUHHCXHe pacxomi « r*panmpy» aftomouau no .. . tr

her (his) stay In the United States, where she (he) will reside

•pens npedusaKiia e CoeAHHexxux lliiarox, rae dyACT npoaotsaik co wtoJ

Vith Be at! 100 Creaent Hill Drive / Selma, Alabama 36701 / U.S.A.-

so adpeeyi • .

State

Steal

» Petitioner's signature

tloAmick npocuTom

pAI.LAS

fopoj lobjf" MOV

Subscribed and sworn to before ne this • 19th ^0f Feb. ff^

.-•'\,. rioAnxcaHo noa npxcnroil-vseaasi npiicytnwuc r • .-, .•••""''+;•':.

X^';>\ t<^:±<>~ HtyLtM*^.•:•':'£?k'-

J " .My Commission expires March 3. 1984 / J. M.-Williams ' " .4*

5j\..;• "r "' Hotary Public /MoTapwye/ .•;"-J->-

" • Subscribed and sworn'to before me this lyth day of Feb., 1981^.

"Tssipn expdres~ab:,T3>.'l9»T. LN&-\\V ' C

"* "

:

••'•'•• Notary Public
INVITATION TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IN THE FETES VASHCHENKO FAMILT

Vaachenkoa In U.S. Embassy in Moecow

Pater Pavlovich Vaeohenko October 30.J926

AuguBtina Vasilyevna Vaaohenko March '•Jv^1929

Lilia Petrovna Vaacbenko July 16, 1957

Lidia Petrovna Vaacbenko March 6, 19151

Llubov Petrovna Vaaohenko December/ 7, 1952

Bnbaauy of the United Stat

o/o The Consular Section.

19 UlitaaCoalkovskogo

Moscow

U.S.U.K. 117234

Vaechenkoa at homo in ChernoKOrok

da

Nadezhda Petrovna Vaschenko

Vera Petrovna Vaacbenko

Alexander Petrovich Vaaohenko

loan. Petrovich Vaaohenko

Yukov Potrovioh Vuuobonko

Dinu Petrovna Vuuoiiunko

Aval Petrovich Vuachonko

Pavel Petrovich Vaacbenko

Sarra Petrovna Vaachenko

Avraom Petrovich Vaacbenko

Liuclmi'la PU'AieSova.

August 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 1959

February 2(i, 1961

Maroh 9, 1962

April 30, 1965

May 1, 1966

July 2, 1967

Ootober 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

~IJ

Ul. 20 Let Khakasil dOB no

g. Cbernogorak 1

Krasnoyarsk^ Rray R.S.P.S.B.

U.S.S.H. 662620''

2/

VaihJie»/fe J•n ua*>y/3,/fS'7

SJifftiy ALABAMA

, DALLAS

C*»nty .

ftJititnc-ri i',*n«r**&

CLtf.

My Commission expires March 3, 1984 \a*s-

• - , . • /V«V<ry

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of Feb., 1981.

My commission expires Feb. 13, 1985. __^j», .\\^.->_«.,$

/WiCrr/ pmWc
No. ?.U.?3

?

9S^.

H&nitsto Hiatus of 9itnsviti

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

all tu iu!;am iljese presento eljnll come, (greeting:

! Certify 7"Aa' Me document hereunto annexed is under the Seal of the State of:

j Alabama* ]

In testimony luljcrcof, /, M»It«» J. StcXKM*tt Jj».,

Secretary of State, hace hereunto caused the seal of the DcpartActing

ment of Stale to he affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer of the said Department, at the city of Washington, in

the District of Columbia, this SHSifi* _ ;.

day of &BS 193.1:.

{•FOR THF MMStTO ori

Bu Y)(&y*scu .9.. .WWJtts

Acting Ailthtntitation Oi£.<:rr{Ptp<iiln:tnt of SiesU.

•J not catid ij it is rtnw.'cd of altered in any Way a'hatto:0;r.
90

exi JWI

STATE OFA/YLARAMA

I, Don Siegelman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuineIn Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

Marrh 11 , 19S1

Don Siegelman Secretary of State
91

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

36701

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. '

lBill" KynarB\}
92

b-a-M-VHrl£ /BU30B/

X- the ttndcrslmed Cecil Williamson Jr. E

li, rBOMiiotmtatMtcn \ (full MUJ /nojwoe nV

• eltiten (peraanent resident) ef the United States of America

rpaxiuoot /nocrommR SORCA/ Ooeamenxvot ttratOB Ampiim, EpwjajauD

Invite By friend Vera Petrovna Vaahchonko

eeoero (relationship) (full Mae)

/ctenex* posers*/ /ROJMO* uv •

fcom April 25, 195*

(full date 1 place of birth)

/nojeuui aaia s uecro ponaeron/

\ \ • ' ' .... ,

• •itlien oR'the- OSSn, n&v residing it: "!• 20 l>eU Khajtasll dom no. 24

rpauuUMUti /rpanaajoty/ CCCF, lame npoaMsaxuero no afpocyi.

S» Chernogorak 1 / KraanoyajBky Kray R.S.F.S.H. / 662620 U.S.S.R.

to visit (live'permanently) with ne In the United State*.

K cede a FORM /xa noeiOHHHoe aanejacTBo/ • CeeOHHexnie Brain.

I an fully capable of supporting the above named person, providing

R loteto soiuoiKwocTk usTepHa^kKO odecneHMTa BknueyKasajotoe aatuo, ' I >,

for any medical expenses, and guaranteeing living" charters during • • -i

OD^aTHT* jgo6ut uejiKUHHCKHS pacxoau M rapaxxupyB ssumiouaA* no /

her (his) stay In the United States, where she (he) will reside

epeu« npedusaiuia. B CoeAxHeHxux UrrsTox, rae Syfler nposoBSTk ce nnoS

ViUl ne atl 100 Creeent Hill Drive / Selma. Alabama VS701 / H.3.1'.

BO aapecyi

LzLZ £o~&. 'et*~*fr^-i

State

Mrex"

\ Petitioner's slgnstur*

DoAnuek npocHTBM

eity~ SEUUl

vopoS _>>.

19th Feb.v;; ' »\

Subscribed and sworn to before ne this day of . *•_j»

\.. JtoAmcano noa npnenroft-tr-«ioeu npsie/TCiBHH .1 ;,\ __'__, •

•••"'«aa';.-'• /V- •*•"> -

v. •

_ My Commission expires March 3, 1984

.- • v •" • ""•-• .-r:: Notary Publlo /notapxye/

Subscribed and ~s«orn to.before BS.thjs l."3lAltVJwSfJ";> t

98Jv_,.,

J 1. M. Williams ' • ' : "$, :••

11 11T.T. T •

.My commission

.» - - • - iata&sJit-jatet

*• - NotaW ru''lMW
IHVITATIGN TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IN THE PETER VASSCHENKO FAMILY

VaBchenkoo In U.S. Embaeoy in Moocow

Peter Paviovich Vasohenko October 30^ 1926

Auguetina Vasilyevna Vasohenko Murcfa .^v \L929

Lilia Petrovna Vaschenko July 16, 1957

Lldia Petrovna Vuochonko March 6, 1951

Liubov Petrovna Vasohenko December/7» 1952

Embassy of the Urited Sta1

o/o The Consular Section.

19-Ulitoa BaalkovekoflO

MOBcow

u.s.a.R. 117234

./>/. , Vaechenkosj tit homo in Chornoffiriik _

ini»ui Aiiiunuviuu rerenmnco juij QUp IUOQ

Nadezhda Petrovna Vaschenko August 7, 1954

Vera Petrovna Vaschenko April 2;;, 1956

Alexander Petrovioh Vaschenko April 7, 1959

loan. Petrovich Vaschenko February 28, 1961

Yukov Petrovioh Vuuohonko Muxoh 9t 1962

Dlna Petrovna Vauohonko April JU, 1965

Avel Petrovioh Vaaohenko May 1, iy66

Pavel Petrovich Vaschenko July 2, 1967

Sarra Petrovna Vaschenko Ootober 9, 1970

Avraam Petrovich Vaschenko April 8, 1974

LtuJmlla PU;lifSov<xV<iiL,J,e.•/ft> January 13,IfS*?

ITl. 20 Lat Xhatat.ll don no.

p. Charnogorak 1

Kraanoyaraky Kray R.S.F.S.R.

U.S.S.R. 662620V

5t.it.

/

,<L/ Jat*-«

/c.7///an«ftj sijiruifitr

County

CJty.

My Commission "expires March 3, 1984

icrlbed and sworn to before me ch

My commission expires Feb. 13, 1985.

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of Feb.. 1981A.

- .y>w~»-q
94

No. ti/Mwr**

eh i&trdes of America

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

i all fa uiljom iljese presents sljall come, greeting:

|£ertify Thai (he document hereunto annexed is under the Seal of the State oj:

i Alabama* \

In tentimeny iuIjcriMif, 1, ..M{kl-kex,..J-*,.-S£Q8£.s&la.._Ji;..+

Acting

Secretary oj State, haec hereunto caused the seal of the DepartActing

ment oj Stale to be affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer oj the said Department, at the city oj Washington, in

the District oj Columbia, this <*»?/*» •

day oj JjW« I9AI:.

TOW THF CONTENTS OH

THE A.'Ir^XiO Lf/CUMifirl

Tilt MMrtTM! NTASV.IMEM

so hLSforisiuiLi rr | HUhg Sm&rg wfsSt.

Acting i Aut^r.tkution Q&mMhpmbmt «/ Stc.u.

i is not valid ij H is removed or altered in any u'uy tchatso:P:r.
95

siysoya-'^

SBATE OFA/VLABAMA

I, Don Siegclman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said VJ. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuineIn Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31. 1981

Don Siegelman Secretary of State
96

WILLIAM A KVNAH0

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

36701

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. H. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "\jill" KynarW T
97

ayjfjj'J

HRuOT JBSSt/

njairinon Jr

(run n*ui«7 /aojaiot, KMv

• cltlten (peraanent resident) of the United States of Mnci

rpaxauom /nocTo/DiKuS HMTCA/ Cecomexmx Co-ana Ai-epam, npicv

J. the mdmnitftti Caoll WllIiamBon Jr.

4v MMBMMMMaadBl *" :

invite gy friend Kadezhda Petrovna Vashchenko

•aosro (relationship} JlUU naae)_

v/V

bom_

/cicneHk poacika/

Auguet 7. 19-J4

/nojetee ay

IfaU Eu t place of birth;

/OSAIUI ut> a ktero poaaeisui/

V \ " * -

• cltiien-ol the USSn, now residing it: Ul." 20 let. Khajmail don no. 24

rpaxauouit /rpauaxxy/ CCCP, BUM* npoaxsuuero ao aapecyi

g. ChernoRorsk 1 / Krasnoyarsk^ Kray B.S.P.S.R. / 662620 U.S.S.R.

to visit (live'pcrcanenUy) with Be in the United States.

It eeSo a roe-m /«a nocroamioe ao-Teja.«ao/ a CoeOHXcHnie bun,

X an fully capable of supporting the above naned person, providing

Jl KUeB aowioaxocxk vaTepHaAHo oeecnexnik aunueyxasaKHos «omo,

for any medical expenses, and guaranteeing living* Quarters during

OBAaTMik jxiut auHUMXctuie paexoaw M rapaHiHpyx aousuouiaAk so

her (his) aUy in the United States, where aha (he) will reside

apeua npetiUBatutn a CoaAKHeioojx UiraTox, rae cyaei nporaBaxk co lOtoA

S$& Ode •T

5

Kith BS att 100 Creaent Hill Drive / Selma. Alabama t67m / Tt.s.A.

no aApecyi

MatM faABaHa

\ Petitioner'e signatura

DoAnuca npocHxajM

ftopa

SELMA

>po3T :ov

Subscribed and sworn to before n» this ,

It, PoAnneaHO noa r-pHcnrolncwoeu npiicyTeTBHii

_day of ,

81,

-» '°_f

My Coraalssion expires March 3, 1984

Subscribed and sworn to before pe tj^is, 19th daXVlf-Fefe-u... 1981,

-^-mc-rss'lon uS/&STm{l£i 1.98b. ! f ( .. '

A, M. Milliams .

Votary Public /KoiapHyc/
98

IMVITATICK TO EMICHATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IN THE PETER VASHCHENKO FAMILY

1« Vaachenkoa in U.S. Embaaay in Moscow

Pater Pavlovioh Vaaobenko October 30.1926

Auguetina Vaeilyevna Vasohonko (-larch "a#^*iy29

Lilia Patrovna Vaaobenko July 16, 1957

Lldia Patrovna Vaeohonko March 6, 1951

Liubov Patrovna Vuuohunko Decouburf'/, 19!>2

Eubuuuy of tha United Sti

o/o The Consular Section

19 Ulita&ChaikovakoflO

Moucow

u.a.a.M, 117234

2. Vaaohenkoa at homo in Chornof^oruk

Pay! AManoviah VMaaaantoQ

Wadezhda Patrovna Vaaobenko

Vera Patrovna Vaaohonko

Alexander Petrovioh Vauobunko

loan. Petrovioh Vuuohenko

Yukov Petrovioh Vuuohunko

Dina Patrovna' Vuuohunko

Aval Petrovioh Vaachenko

Pavel Petrovioh Vaaobenko

Sarra Petrovna Vaachenko

Avraam Petrovioh Vaachenko

Liadmil*

Jy.j QU) 1UU0 '

Auguut 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 1959

February 2U, 196I

Maroh 9. 1962

April JO, lyG'j

May 1, 1966

July 2, 1967

October 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

J;J

Ul. 20 Lot Kh.ka.ll do. no.

g. Cherno^orek 1

Krasnoyarsk^ Kr.jr R.S.P.S.R.

U.S.S.R. 662620

CWAifSova. VasUclicnffo January 13,1fS*7

fj;t;ane-fi */< rt«/»i"c iT«.

2&&

Count)

Cjif_

¥-

£&£?£Z- \j My Commission expires March 3, 1984

Subscribed and svorr. to before me this 19th day of Feb.

My commission expires Feb. 13, 19U5. V^'VV. (V
No. ..?..1

./???.?.?'.'.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

nil ia uiljom S^ese presents sljaU come, ©reeling:

i Certify J'Aoi the document hereunto annexed is under the Seal of the Stctc of:

j Alabama* !

in iefltimmtij lultcrrof, /, ^]#kti*£.JL..S$0*884t+ jftff»#

Aoting

Secretary of Stale, hace hereunto caused the seal of the DepartActing

ment of Slate to be affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer of the said Department, at the city of Washington, in

the District of Columbia, this *£•££& -'.

day of £fi£ folk.

(•FOIt THE CONTENTS OH

inn A:if*::xi.D ocxuMfrirl flic. tl'.-AFlTMLMf AV.'JMESj

NO NUrOMftlMUTy

Acting AutHerMcBtion Vfi-Jcr. fJepuito

\te is not ealid if it is removed or altered in any Way whatsoever.

Or>
100

6i'J9099 -//

&TATE OFA/ALABAMA

I, Don Siegelman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine.

>j£$d§*&MU

In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31, 1981

r\ C: I t* c . CO., Don Siegelman Secretary of State
101

WILLIAM A. KVNAftD

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

3S70I

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "Bill" Kynardr%-*
102

h-a-MtSm /BUXB/ fti'jSOyy

rpaaaaxxx /nocroaxxull tmtjb/ Osuimeima Brane ibwpaKa, npxr«m

*n»lte «or friend Liubov Petrovna Vaehchenko

,,0*ro ^relationship; , Iftill MM]

born December 17, 1952

ifull gjg t plJce 0j birthj - -

W

• eitlzen 6f *the USSl; now residing at! Embassy of thePnitea states

tpawuouia /rpauaMxy/ CCCP, temtfeaSuam&m eapacri. B8al

19 Plitsa ChaikoYBkogo / Moseoy / U.S.S.8. •Ml 11 *) H.?, fl?.!*!1

! ^

lv»"pe»»«'>en«y) "1th me In the United States.

* BOOS • rORH /HA noCTOKHHOO •KTCACTBS/ > CoeAHHeXXlie ttlm.

5 •.?'iiLe*

TV'b1'of ""PPO'tin* the above tuned person, providing A nica soixomocn «UTcpnaju,xo oSeene<uiTk Sim^yxaaaxxoe jwuo. • / />

SLSZ.*!^1expenses, and guaranteeing living-eiuertera durlai • • »

oojiaiiii, «oSue ueAMUxxcxxe pacxoau M rapamHpyn asunjiouaAa ao ! ~

•SL&SL&I *» *£• United States, "here she (he) idll reside

epsxa npe&aaxHii a CoeAxxexxux Ittiaxax, rae Cyaei npoxwaT. co snofl

S'lSew 10°

Cr?Bent HU1 DriYe 1Sn1

DO aapeeyi •- ""•••• iiaa LHAJ ;

\ Petitioner's signature

State ' ALABAMA " • . •

DoanHck »P»eww

Itrai

DALLAS

fopoi >pojr- :OV

"V- :..- . Sutscrfbea and morn to before ce thla -"th day of Feb' ifF.'

.;UoflroieaBO noa npxcnroii-« voex npiieyicxaiiM . ~ ' .

\\u^J$f&u<. 6EAI, /*. >

."<. •> MY Commission expires March 3, 1984 HoUry Public /HoTtpKjre/

_My commission expires Feb: ,!-»• i983. I« * t "' • - "

••^v^'A-N'fcy-°L-

J

i

>
103

INVITATION TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IN THE PETER VASHCHENKO PAMILT

Vaachenkoa In U.S. Embassy in Moacow

Peter Povlovich Vaaohenko October

Auguatina Vaailyevna Vaaohenko March *^^*l929

Lilia Petrovna Vaschenko July 16, 1957

Lidia Petrovna Vaaohenko March 6, 1951

Liubov Petrovna Vaaohenko Docembor/7» 1952

' 30. 1926 Erabaouy of the United Stat

o/o-The Consular Seotlon>

19 Ulitsa-Cbaikovakogo

Moacow

u.s.s.R. 117234

Vaachenkoa at home in Chornof^orok

Nadezhda Petrovna Vaschenko

Vera Petrovna Vaschenko

Alexander Petrovich Vaaohenko

loan. Petrovich Vaaohenko

Yakov Petrovioh Vuuohonko

Dinu Petrovna Vuuohonko

Avel Petrovich Vaschenko

Pavel Petrovich Vaschenko

Sarra Petrovna Vaschenko

Avraam Petrovioh Vaschenko

nti i -JUAugust 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 1959 Ul.

U.S.S.R. 662620

20 Let Xhakasll don no. 2

April 30, 1965

May 1, I966

Juls 2, 1967

Ootober 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

VatkcAen/fo Jan uary 13, /TS^

S J. DALLAS CaoJx. ,

.1 SELMA Cay.

;

' My Commission expires March 3, 1984

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of Teb., 1981.

My raniiwlM expires Feb. 13, 19«5. 1 V\< Q
104

AV No. .**/?*?££

^>inl2s txt Amelia

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

nil fa uiijnm ttjcse presents sljalt come, (Sreeimtj:

: Certify 1 httl tk: document hereunto annexed is under the Seal oj the Stele of:

Alabama *

in tcntimony mliertnf, I. ..Mal.t.ex...J.*...S.t(?e.s.G.e.lM..j£**

Acting

Secretary of Stale, have hereunto caused the seal of the DepartActing

men! of State to be affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer of the said Department, at iht city of Washing/on, in

the District of Columbia, this $U?lfth •

day of !?!&* , 19Ak.

TOR mr

nil vi-.'x

iii t/ ;->.M

NO HuSI'

g AuAtntitetiPrt Oji-.ttyhportn-.tnt of Slc.lt.

Tlii

Actvng

i!e is not Oalid if it is removed or altered in any u\iy whr.iso:Cer.
105

6i,J809SH*'

sTATE OFALABAMA

I, Don Siegelman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly comnissioned Clerk cf said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine*

In Testimony Whereof, 1 have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31, 1981

/rC4^>^/^£<LrZ^U-tg>^

Don Siegelman Secretary of State
106

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

3670t

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on^this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "Bill" Kynafer-f
107

X- the ttnderslmed Ceoll Williamson Jr.

A, axunaanxcuiMitn \ (full osioe)-~" /anno* M»V

• eltiten (perasnent resident) ef the United States of Minu

rpeaauoot /noeremmill aoae*./ Ooewxeiooa LneTos Axepmai, npwjnssu:

invite'tor friend • Lidla Petrovna Vaahchenlco

e»oero (relationship) (full Sal]

/cienawk poacna/ /ncwoe nil/

_/*

to visit (live'permanently) with Be In the United States.

K cede a roerii /«» noCTO/omoe ssneACTBo/ • CoeAXMexnie Brain.

bom Karon 6, 1951 _^_____^_____ ',

(full date S place of birtnj

/ooAua aaia • neero poaaenuv

x .\ • '

• oltlten>f-,the USSn, now residing it: Erobaeay of the United States

rpajsaaioma '/rpaiaanKy/ CCCP, nix* npoaataaauero BO upecyi.

19 Ulltaa Chalko'vakogo / Moaoow / U.S.S.R. ggg* HI12.'ilfI am fully capable of supporting the above named person, providing |~

fl KUCB souioaxocTa MaiepHej&HO ofiecnexxTS auuevKsssjoios «tuo, • 7

for any aediesl expenses, and guarantying living- quarters during •

ooMTXifc mint tieoxuMHcxHS paexow K ra,>axTHpy» aousuiouau so

her (his) stay in the United States, where (he (he) will reside

Bpeim npedLaaxmi B CoesHMewoox UiraTax, rae Oyntr nposHBttfc co KHott

Vith s» Stl 100 Creaent Hill Drive / Selma. Alabama ^6701 / H.S-iHO aapecyt ~" «

did* 6dJUState ALABAMA Bru •••••

'. DALLAS

1 Petitioner's signature

OoAmick npocHieJM

• •. SELMA

fopoa fcoojr »v

19ch Feb. 81 '

Subscribed and sworn to before ae this dsr of » W_*

floAnuesKO noa npncnroR-t< ttoeu fipncyxcxBiui

- My Commission expires'March 3, 1984

' J. M. -Williams •". • "''"'.'

••My commission.expired Febl 13, 198}. *. !>•. K VCvk-^-j^iV
108

INVITATION TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IN THE PETER VASHCHENKO FAMILY

Vaachenkoa in U.S. Embassy in Moacow

Pater Pavlovich Vaachenko October 30*J.926

Auguatina Vaeilyevna Vaachenko March 0$ T.°29

Lilia Petrovna Vaachenko July 16, 1957

Lidia Petrovna Vaachenko March 6, 1951

Liubov Petrovna Vaaohenko December/ 7, 1952

Embaaay of the United State

c/o The Consular Section*

19 Ulitea Chaikovekogo

Moscow

U.S.S.R. 117254

2» Vaechenkoo at home in Chernoftorak

Prural flntmm. i ntr~Ymn hiiiiln

Nadezhda Petrovna Vaaohenko

Vera Petrovna Vaachenko

Alexander Petrovich Vaaohenko

loan Petrovich Vaaohenko

Yakov Petrovioh Vuuohonko

Dina Petrovna Vuuohenko

Avel Petrovich Vaachenko

Pavel Petrovich Vaachenko

Sarra Petrovna Vaaohenko

Avraam Petrovich Vaaohenko

Tiily aft, 1RHR J^L

Liuami le

August 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 1959

February 28, 1961

Muroli 9, 1962

April 30, 1965

Hay 1, 1966

JulJ 2, 1967

October 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

til. 20 Let Khakaali don ne. 24

g. Chernogorelc 1

Krasnoyarsk? Kray H.S.F.S.R.

U.S.S.R. 662620

rhillpiovtt Vathclt cn/fo Jan uat-y 13,175*7

ej-ifnlo/isri si*n*IUI~e, til

S&fc

Cvvnlir9-

<U¥

$AS*MLCJ *»J sworn % bcfe+c, mc -Mis

19th Jt*tflil.j *tIL.

My Commission expires" March 3, 1984.

QWj bjJL&*Jct- ^j~

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of Fth., i9sl.

- ;-• ,..->1rr-. F'h. 11. 1SS5. I \. ,
109

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

la all fa uijjom iljea? uressnts sl]ull corns, ©reeling:

i Certify That the document hereunto annexed is under the Seal cf the State oj:

Alabama*

M, 81/09099-/!>

M>itxi2s of &merrsra

Secretary of Stele, hace hereunto caused the seal of the DepartActing

ment of State to be affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer of the said Department, a! the city of Washington, in

the District of Columbia, this *»*?/** .\

day of JW* , I9AI-.

NO hLSi'OfiSim; i aafffig•j£

* .Vw^c* § mi•*-

Actingll'J AuOjatketitn OJiitr, DtfwMxnt of .S'.ctt.

/ Caltd if it is removed or altered in any Way ichrJsocflcr.
110

eiuso^y•

sTATE OFA/idLABAMA

I, Don Siegelman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine.

In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31. 1981

f^J-er>^ A*Sjue.gl^£rr<-*^ >

Don Siegelman Secretary ofState
Ill

WILLIAM A. KVNAIO

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

36701

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "Bill" Kynard \\i ""
112

WXJMMZ /BU3DB/ j)L>

J, the tmderslmtd cer.n lillliMflB £U

H, BXBCB0AmcuaMJtc« ; (fun MIM) /I1CJB4M «V

• eitlten (peraanent resident) of the United States of aaerica

J7«xa»Jooi /noctomniR MtM*/ Cbeaxxeioaa Uraios Avrpxni, ejirxai

invite "ny, fUsni • Lilla Potrovna Vanhehento

esoero (relationship) (full naaej

/Menem, peacxaa/ /no-woi taut/ •

*o"\ July 16. 19T7

(full dite t place of birth)

• eltlxen'eTHhf USSR, BOW residing »t: Embassy of the United Stata.

rpasaaKXHt /rpauaxic// CCCP, lomt npoaotsaxuero as upecyi

TQ nut.. B^lAltMMkaM /I

/

B a a B ^»^ I

fr,<?'1

fc

to visit (llve'pcraanently) with tie in the United States.

*t cede a roRM /M» noctoaxxoe mcACtw/ • Cotuwemoie Brain.

2 are fully capable of supporting the above named person, providing / /,

ft Mica soixoanoctk uuepHSAXO odecnevnk auaeyMSaxifOS «cuo, 5e"<* oac ^

• ~ ^

for any aedleal expenses, and guaranteeing living* r.uartera during - OB-uTuik .aoeiie aeAm-KHcxHS paexomi a rapaKTHpys aouauoisaOk ao

her (his) stay in the united States, where she (he) will reside

apex* npeduaaKMii a CoeaKHexxux Uh-aTOX, r«e dyfler npooBSTi> ee

idtll BS atl 100 Creaent mil Drive / Selma, Alabama -.6701 / tl.H:t.

no sj-pecyi "~""~""~ ~ ~ " * "' ' "

\

8Ute

Bras

felKlr*'-

\ Petitioner's signature

DoAiniCk npocHram

Wo" >pac• -J55*

•'"• 19th Feb. 81/ .

Subscribed and sworn to before oe this day of . lf_j»... .V

" JkuvuiCaKO Ml npxeiiroll-trsweat npiieyreraaa , .-•*•-.'''''•

. " '... ij/ ;.--.' I J.-M. Williams • •_ . : . l,'J

-My Commission expire. March 3, 1984 Hotarjr Public /HotapKye/ ' -.'0J

Subscribed and sWbrn to "bef(It we this 19fA»Hay of Feb.', 1981.'

-"rly coramiss'ion expijtes Feb. "lj, iy85t "*. ,v vi ' _
113

-f

DJVITATIOH TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IN THE PETER VASHCHENKO PAM1LT

VaBChenkoa in _U.S. Kmbanay in Moaoow

Peter Pavlovich Vaaohenko October 30^^-926

AugUBtina Vaailyevna Vaaohenko March '30^1.929

Lilia Petrovna Vaachenko July 16, I',-•,<,'

Lidia Petrovna Vaachenko March 6, 1953

Liubov Petrovna Vaachenko December/7, 19t>2

Embaouy of tie United Sta1

o/o The Consular Section

19 Ulitea -Chalkovakogo

Moscow

U.S.S.H. 117234

Vaachenkoa at homo in Chorno/^orok

£55 VuuilimUJJ

Nadezhda Petrovna Vaachenko

Vera Petrovna Vaachenko

Alexander Petrovich Vaaohenko

loan. Petrovich Vaaohenko

Yukov Petrovich Vuuchonko

Dinu Potrovnu Vuuohunko

Avol Petrovich Vuuchonko

Pavel Petrovich Vaachenko

Sarra Petrovna Vaachenko

Avraam Petrovich Vaachenko

Liad mlU

juij KU, 1UUQ

Auguat 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 19^9

February 2ti, 1961

March 9» 1%2

April JO, lyfij

May 1, li/66

July 2, 1967

October 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

J.W

III. 20 Let Kh«k»»li don no.

g, Chernogorsk 1

Krasnoyarsk; Kray R.S.?.S.8.

U.S.S.R. 662620

PftttipSe** VathcAen/f0

Sfi,1*

Jar) uafv Z3, IfS^

'& ALABAMA

CoUnjy/ DALLAS

SELMA

¥

My Commission expires March 3, 1984

u<^~-

/Yrfirv f*Mc

Subscribed and sviorn to before me this 19th day of Feb./l98l.

• ... If- "•••'. H. 19K1. , ^ \.-
114

N• Sl/09099-1 1

hcttteb #iai£s of Attwffh

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

till io uiijam fljes? jireseitfo B1[UU come, ©reeling:

Certify Thai the document hereunto annexed is under the Sea! oj the Slate oj:

\ Alabama* j

in tcstimonu tuljcrcof, /, ...Walter.J•..Stogs.se_l^..Jr_.^

Acting

Secretary oj State, hace hereunto caused the sea! 0/ the Depart'

Acting

menl of State to he affixed and my name subscribed by the Authentication Officer oj the said Department, at the city oj Washington, in

the District oj Columbia, this fi»»lfi* .\

day oj . June 19.8L.

Acting AuthenticIkalion Q0uirf£kpvrtmcnt of SUit.

not Caliti ij it is removed or altered in any Wuy u'hakocccr.
115

Sil'SOsy-"^

SI, Don

TATE

Siegelman, Secretary

OF /\JLABAMA A

of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine, , ^^^^^

In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31. 1981

jUfrr^/CkJl,

Don Siegelman Secretary of State
116

WILLIAM A. KYNANO

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA, ALABAMA

36701

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. "Bill" KynSJJJ
-/* J

117

l the undersiened n•M ] miHnmnon Jr. ••

It BcunaamcuaMOcti . (full MB*] /nojwoe nV

• tltlten (cersancnt resident) of the United States of Anerece

rpsiliBOf /nocTomnifl matju/ Coc&mtiaaa ttraroa Axepxioi, npxr.«*ne»

Inrlf'gf friend • Peter Pavlovloh Vashchenlm

e»oero (relationship) (full MU

/cttneHt poacni/ /no/noe BM/ -

fcom October y?, ?,?e^ ',

(full date & place of birth)

/nomut JUTS • necTO poutimv •' *

• eltitert of the USSI!, BOW residing it: Embassy of the United st«t««

rptxauaiiit-~/fptiiiAxxy/ CCCP, am npoaKsaxuero «o ifipecyi.

,19 Ulitsa ChalkQYBkQKO / MOBCOK / U.S.S.H.•MB I I 7 3- ^ 9~~

to visit (llve'pcraanently) with «e in the United States. ^ -y

K cede • rociH /m nociomxoe sMievaeieo/ • CoeOMHexKue Dram. ••• 7

X in fully capable of supporting the above named person, providing

A net) BouioaMocik UTeptuAHO oSecneuxn suueyxaoaxMo* *mo, *

for any aedleil expenses, and guaranteeing living* quarters during -

OCUTXII .sjooiie ueoKUxHcxHa paexoxui M repaxTHpys aounuiouaak ao .

her (his) stay in the United States, vhere she (he) vill reside

epexs npedusaxxn e Coejutxexxvx LiiaTox, ru dyaer npos»tT» co aotoS

With me Itl 100 Cresent H111 Drive / Selma. Alabama 167m / IT.ft.i: 1 no lApecyi

.DALLAS

/f~y £UJU*-O~S*I

\ Petitioner1* signature

Ooanxcfc npocuTSJU

ropo; >j»*r"

Subscribe* and sworn to beforo oe this \ •

191:h tar Of Febf '. IfoAnueauo noA npucurofiif^oeu upiicyrctDHM

"jm*ij-iyJ *....•.,. .^c?'j- * •>• it »mi•' '-"

Notary Public /Hoiapxyc/

" Hy Conmlssion expires March:3, 1984 .

1

'• subsgrTbVTS..,! • WotrfBTWdry** ««rijtt. p-«l*l»»ri*

My conmlsrton expljes Feb. 13, 1985.. >^^"V^LrMaJj
118

¥

INVITATION TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IN THE PETER VASHCHENKO PAMILT

1, Vaschenkoa in U.S. Embassy in MOBCOV

Peter Povlovioh Vaechenko October 30*J.926

Auguatina Vasilyevna Vaechenko March T&y^i :>:".'

Lilia Petrovna Vaechenko July 16, 1957

Lidia Petrovna Vaechenko March Ct 19$1

Liubov Petrovna Vaoohenko Docombor/7t 1952

Embauuy, of the United Sta

o/o The Consular Section.

19 UllteaChaikovekogo

Moocov

U.S.S.R. 117234

2» Vaechenkoa at homo in Chorno;roruk

9mm fritniii i j uli Y I rn•

Nadezhda Petrovna Vaechenko

Vera Petrovna Vaechenko

Alexander Petrovich Vaeohenko

loan. Petrovich Vupohenko

Yukov Petrovioh Vuuohonko

Dina Petrovna Vuuohunko

Avel Petrovioh Vaechenko

Pavel Petrovich Vaechenko

Sarra Petrovna Vaeohenko

Avraam Petrovioh Vaechenko

Liudmi lc

'jmv ^o, moo

Auguet 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 1959

February 28, 1961

Muroh 9, 1%2

April 30, 1%$

May 1, iy66

July 2, 1967

Ootober 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

S,eJ

I/l. 20 Let Xhaka.il don no. 2

g. Chornogor.k 1

Kraanoyaxeky Kray R.G.F.S.B.

u.s.s.R. 662620

CU'tUoSovei Vathelten/fe Jan u*fy/3,/7£*?

5f?f?<

Cotnty

Peiifiener'i fin*'we*

... CJ£T

f5

.hscrlU ** J *»»» %h<f~._.r+ #>'* J^JyJt^C

My Co-aission expires March 3, 1984 Fe^tW /**''«•

s",.,..r!. ..\<t,A. fvorn to hofnre me this l'.'tn day ot ten., n°r ^ ]<)g5_

ty iiu£A&^^-
119

No. .?}l?.?°?.9'\''

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

<Ea nil to lufjom il;eae presents aljalt come, ©reeling:

i Certify 1 hat the document hereunto annexed is under the Seal of the State o]:

Alabama* j

In testimony luljen-o!, /, ...}/a.l.t.e.r...i,...S.to.e.s.s.e.lx. .?r..0

Acting

Secretory of Stale, have hereunto caused the seal of the Depart'

Acting

menl of Slate to he affixed and my name subscribed by the duthcnlicalion Officer of the said Department, at the city of Washington, in

the District of Columbia, this tSSMHi ;.

day of if*!* KM.:.

uw&ffM,ja {jJoJLbuX, .JM^v&aJ) %

Ac 'C%n'j AutKtntiaidon 0Jp<:er)JDci>uttn:ent of Str.tc.

ale is not Calid if it is rcmoi'id or altered in any u'ay u:ha!io:Ccr.
120

6iv90J*9

-i'

sTATE OFA/idLABAMA

I, Don Siegelman, Secretary of State, ofthe State of

Alabama, having custody ofthe Great and Principal Seal

ofsaid State, do hereby certify that the attestation of

W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas County in

the State of Alabama, to the instrument hereto attached is in due form;

that said Circuit Court of Dallas County in the State of Alabama is a

court of record of this State; that said W. A. "Bill" Kynard is the

duly commissioned Clerk of said Circuit Court and that his signature

appearing to said attestation is, to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, genuine. ^^_^_

In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto

set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the

State, at the Capitol, in the

City of Montgomery, on this day.

March 31. 1981

Don Siegelman Secretary of'
121

WILLIAM .

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT

DALLAS COUNTY

SELMA. ALABAMA

36701

I, W. A. "Bill" Kynard, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dallas

County in the State of Alabama do hereby certify that said

J. M. Williams is a duly commissioned notary public in Dallas

County and the State of Alabama in that his signature appearing

to said attestation is genuine. In Testimony Whereof, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Circuit Court

of Dallas County, Alabama, on this day.

February 19, 1981

W. A. ''Bill" Kynar^VA T
122

t, «*« "ndarsiened n•nii mm...., jr. ; _•.

It, BMenoAiweaaaMlfca\ (full fttwj /oMBtoe nV

• citlten (peraanent resident) of the United States of «mnci

rpazauoat /nocronuaiH Mtadk/ Coejumemoot UrsToe JUicpma, nptcosu

Invite gy friend • AuguatAna YKHI 1 ynvna YftHhrhnnlrg , m

CBOero (relationship) (lull naae)

/cienext poAeraa/ /ramoi nv -

tern March 2S. 1929 '

(full date i place of birth)

faamm sata • uecTo poaaeiotv

• eltltenof ttf USSO, now residing it: Embaaav-hr th« -nrHt..,! BtfiC

rpuauoiHf /rpixaaxxy/ CCCP, ami npesHBuuero BO upecyi.

19 Ulltsa Chalkovakogo / MOGCO» / II , ,11, BBIBBBSI jl11'7,'h

to visit (live'permanently) with ne in the United State*.

x cede B rortH /H* noCTonxxoe asnejiacTBo/ • Coejuoicxioie mrtni.

X an fully capable of supporting the above named person, providing

A sun Bouioauoeia ataTepxajiaxo odecnewna BwieyxasaxKos wooo, ;

for any aedieal expenses, and Eusranteeine living rusrters during -

oouTjfik •nootie ueaKUHHcxHs paexoou x rapaHTMpyn aouiuioiitad* BO

her (his) stay in the United States, where she (he) will reside

•peua npeduaaKxa B Coea>n<eH>aix WTSTU, rae dyaex npoasaTk co an

U.S.4.

With B» atl ' 100 Creaant Hill llrtv. / fS>lt... il.h-m. Kmi / Tl * t

no aapocyi •

ttate '

ALftBAHA

baa

\ Petitioner1* signature

DOAIMC* npocuTSJK

ytyl.

»v

Subscribed and sworn to before ne this *

JIOAnncaxo noA npxenroil'S Matt. npiicytciBKH

SEAL

J. k: Williams

My-Commlssion expires March 3, 1984

b^cr^bed and swp ta hefpr^.me. this. IScb day.wjfJet-.1981 ir .•»-•«.,_

Mycoinnlssion expired PeB. H-, 1985. I * 5 V »j ' ' '' "'"'* *

turv P..M Rl r

Notarv PiiStT"
123

f

INVITATION TO EMIGRATE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS LISTED BELOW IN THE PETER VASHCHENKO FAMILT

Vnnohonkon in tl.i.. Knihniiny in Mmioow

1'otor l'liviovioh Viiiiolitiiiko Uolouui- 30. J

l

JU6

Auguulina Vuuilyovim Vuuohonko Muruh iB^i.'j'.^j

Lilia Potrovnu Vuochonko July 16, VJ'j'l

Lidia Petrovna Vaschenko March 6, 1951

Liubov Potrovna Vauohenko Docombor/7, 1952

, VaBChenkos at home in ChernoKorBk

•Ftiiul ftiituimluu FggCBWBW • UU1J LO)

Nadezhda Petrovna Vaschenko

Vera Petrovna Vaschenko

Alexander Petrovich Vaschenko

loon. Petrovich Vasohenko

Yukov Fotrovloh Vuuohonko

DInu Potrovnu Vuuohonko

Avel Petrovich Vaschenko

Pavel Petrovich Vaschenko

Sarra Petrovna Vaschenko

Avraam Petrovich Vanchenko

luuimuuy of tho United atat

o/o The Consular Sootioa

19 Ulitea Chaikovskogo

MoQcow

U.S.S.R. 117234

1000

August 7, 1954

April 25, 1956

April 7, 1959

February 28, I96I

Muroh 9, 1962

April 30, ly65

May 1, I966

July 2, 1967

October 9, 1970

April 8, 1974

JuJ01. 20 Let Khakuli dom no. 2/

g. Cherncgorafc 1

Kraonoyaroky Kr»y R.S.F.S.R.

U.S.S.R. 662620

Llujntila Pt\;Uf3ov*V*4i«A**/fo JanuafvJ3,/fSy I

fajez, -£*~.s*<)

5~t,jf ALABAMA I e/lftffnar't Slfntifilt

C*unff "*UAS

CJ.*h

Smks+r&d *»Jtmo*n to before *c 1*!* J*£-J*f *' S**-J$

".'. fly Commission expires March 3, 1984 ^|Attt^

Subscribed and sworn to before me this lyth day of Feb., i98i. '

My commission expires Feb. 13, 15S5. " K w ft ^%?*4
124

lKFbRKATlON • SHEET

PROCEDURES FOiT OBTAINING EXIT DOCUMENTATION

FROM THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS

Genere.1 Information

By Soviet law persons desiring to leave ";he Sovit;

Union, either permanently or temporarily, s.isx. receive

permission from Soviet authorities. This permission i»

granted in .the form ox exit documentation w.-.ich for

Soviet citizens consists of a Soviet foreign travel

passport stamped with a Soviet exit visa.

The Soviet passport and Soviet exit visa *re

applied for at the Office of Visas and Registration

(OVIR) where the person resides. Xf there is no OVIR

in an individual's community, he may apply througn

his local militia (i.e., police) office.- An invitation

from a US sponsor is one of the documents vhicr. must

be submitted to OVIR along with the application for

passport and visa.

Invitation from U.S. Sponsor

The local OVIR requires a notarized letter of

invitation from a person in the United States, usually

a relative. This notarized letter is called a "vyzov."

It is important to note that the "vyzov" is not a visa

and it should not be confused with Soviet exitdocumentation (a USSR foreign passport stamped with a

Soviet exit visa) or with a United States immigrant

or visitor's visa.

Contents of "Vyzov"

Although there may be local variations in retirements, we understand the following are necessary:

1) The "vyzov" should be written in Russian as

veil as in English.

2) It should be from the sponsor in the United

States to the person in the USSR. There should be one

notarized copy of the "vyzov" for each Soviet applicant

named in it.

" 3) The "vyzov* must state the relationship between
125

the sponsor and the Soviet resident and mention the

sponsor's ability and willingness to assume full

support of the alien, including housing and Medical

expenses.

Attached to this information sheet are two copies

•o* » sample "vyzov" which may be used to comply with

the requirements describee above. The format is not

an official Soviet Government form, but it follows a •

format which in our experience has been acceptable to

the Soviet authorities.

Authentications of "vyzov"

The "vyzov" MUST be notarized by a local notary

public in the United States. On occasion applicants

have been requires- by their local OVIR to obtain

authentications of the original notarization. If

authentication oi the notarization is desired, the

following steps should be taken:

Z-.

. 1) The .Clerk of the Court of the County whgre the

notary public is commissioned should certify the legal

authority of the'jotarv public, Then, the Secretary*

Of State of the State in which the document is executed

anouia certify to the official status of the Clerk of~"

tne court: ~ I ~

2) After having the "vyzov" certified by the State (2. J

officials, the US sponsor should forward the document

to the Authentication Officer. Departm^n* of »»»••», -

Washington, D. C. 2C520 for authentication under the

seal ot the Department of States There is a.fee of

$3tuu for this authentication service, and a check or

postal money order in the correct amount siould be made

payable to the "Department of State." After authentication* the "vyzov" will be returned to the US sponsor.

[ 3) The 'wiov' should then be sent bv the US

spoftsgjx'to the Consular Division, Soviet Embassy. 1639

uecatur **""""" "Street. Street. M.W.. N, Washington, wasningtoT P. C. lor final

authentication. The Soviet Emba

•09-rftO for this service. ' sassy cnarges a fee C£

tor this service. ••-

-tf3T

Transmission of "Vyzov" Directly to Soviet Applicant

After the authentications are completed, the "vyzov"

• .?.
126

should be transmitted by the sponsor directly bv registered air mail to the relative in the~USSR for hi* use

in applying for his Soviet exit documentation.

The "Wzov" is rfcuired bv Soviet authorities,

not by the L'.S. Gcvcr.-rr.ent. Neither the "Vyzov" nor

copies of it should be sent to the US Embassy in Moscow

or to the Departmet of State.

Applicants in the USSR may correspond with the OS

Embassy as may be necessary, in Russian or English,

making sure to keep the Embassy informed of the exact

date and place that an application is made to the OVIR

O* i* refused by the OVIR. The OS Embassy's address

for this purpose is Consular Section, US Embassy,

Ulitsa Chaikovskovo 19/21, Moscow. The Embassy's telephone number-is: 252-C0-11.

Individuals in the USSR with Claim to American Citizenship

In cases involving Soviet citizens who may have

a claim to American citizenship, it is recommended that

they apply for permission to leave the Soviet Union ir.

the.same manner ts described above. That is, they should

make formal application for Soviet exit documentation

.and submit a "vyzov," preferably from a close relative

'in the United States. The reason for this is that evan

should the United States Government recognize the claim

to American citizenship, Soviet authorities will almost

certainly require the individual to depart the USSR

using a Soviet passport with a Soviet exit visa.

. Soviet citizens who believe they may have a claim

to US citizenship should, however, visit the US Embassy

Consular Section for a special consular interview.

They should take with them their personal documents such

as birth and marriage certificates, plus three passporttype photographs.

Soviet Authorities Grant or Deny Permission

•

Application for Soviet exit documentation may be

a long and perhaps unsuccessful endeavor. He can give

no assurance that exit documentation will be issued

since this is a matter over which the Soviet authorities

have exclusive jurisdiction.
127

If exit permission is denied, individuals My reapply

•is>Bontns after the date of refusal. They Bay also appeal

refusal to various higher authorities.

If exit permission is granted by the Soviet authorities

for travel to the United States, the individual.will receive

his Soviet passport valid for travel abroad and his exit

visa from his local militia or OVIR office.

If exit permission to emigrate is granted, the applicant

ahould""~immediately notify the American Embassy in Moscow

that he has received Soviet exit permission, giving the

Embassy his exact address and the date of expiration of his

•xit visa. The Embassy can then send by registered nail

precise instructions to the prospective immigrant concerning

the documents which will be required for an application for

OS immigration processing. The applicant need not visit the

Embassy in Moscow until he receives a specific Invitation free

the Embassy to come in for final processing of his case.

If exit permission is granted for

.... ..~- . .. the * '" '

•pplleant need not notify the American Embassy in advance

that he has received his Soviet exit visa, but only appear

at the Embassy any working day (Monday through Friday other

than US and Soviet holidays) with two photographs and the

address of his US sponsor. No other documents are necessary.

A visitor's visa is normally issued immediately to a qualified

applicant.

Correspondence directed from the US to the American

Embassy in Moscow should be addressed: Consular Section.

American Embassy, Moscow, Department of State, Washington,

D.C. 20520. Air mail postage should be affixed to cover

nailing from point of origin to Washington, D.C.

Department of State

Office of Soviet Union Affairs

November 1977
128

Wi&maSm /BOOB/

X, the undersicned

H, waenonmcuiwXeK \ (rull naae)-' /nojwoo »K/

• citizen (persanent resident) of the United States of America

rpaaauow /nocToffiKuft WXJCJSB/ Coeoxxeio-ux toaios Auepxiw, npxr.

invite gy • CBoero (relationship) (full naae)

/cteneKb poacTBa/ /nojotoe KMV

bom

(full date & place of birth)

/noAUA Aata n kecio poaaexMfl/

f

• citizen of the USSR, now residing at

rpa*siwoia /rpaxaaxKy/ CCCP, Kuxe npoaatsaiauero no aapecyt

to visit (live'pcraanently) with me in the United States.

x cede B roc?M /«a nocTO/tHHoe aaue.-i.CT8o/ B CoeoHHeKioie Brant.

I an fully capable of supporting the above named person, providing

A mcie BoutoKHocxfc iiaTepHaj&KO ooecnesmk BuuieyxasaxKoe «mo,

for any medical expenses, and guaranteeing living* Quarters during

onjiaiHU, no6ut ueAKUXKcxite paexocu H rapaHTt-pyn atxjOMouiaAfc BO

her (his) stay in the United States, where ehe (he) will reside

BpeuA npedisaHHR B CoeaKHeHMtx lfoaxax, rae Oyaei i-pora-saTi. co wot

with ne ati

no aapecyi

-, Petitioner's signature

noAtmch npocHTeJW

State

lla-ai"

:ov .

Subscribed and sworn to before ae this day of » 19.^j»

JIoAnMcaHo noa npncra-ofc-s -woeu npjicyrciBHH ' •

sau. " -

Notary Public /Hoiapxye/ ~~ "
129

"SAVB"

Ht. I Box 49-A

Pike Hoad, Al. Moscow. Embassy of the USA

36064 U3A. November I. 1981.

Bear Cecil. Janie and Babette,

We. the Vaahehenko family, aak and truet you to

intercede for the emigration of our family. We truet you

to express the opinion of our family to the people and

governments on the religion ns well as political questions

as they arise and about which we will inform you.

It is nonsible that our opinions sometimes will bsrr

different from yours but we ask you to express our opinions as they are.

We thank you very much for your kindness, work,

prayers and intercession for ^he emigration of our family

that you w>re doin« during the past 40 months.

We ask you please, continue to intercede before

both governments, the American and Soviet, so that our

whole fa-iily could come to your country.

May ^od bless and help you.

Respectfully Yours,

The Vnshchenko family.

P3. This letter of attorney fnm Nov. 1st I98I concerns to

Rev. Cecil Williamson, Mrs. J«n*e Trake and Mrs. Babette

Wampold who at the present time are leaders of the SATE

organization that located in Alabama, USA.and the address

of which isj SATS, Route I Box 49-A, Pike Road, Alabama.

36064 USA. Telephones (205)-272-3208 or (205)-272-7349.
130

Senator SIMPSON. Thank you very much, Jane Drake.

Now please, we will hear from Blahoslav Hruby.

STATEMENT OF REV. AND MRS. BLAHOSLAV S. HRUBY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND EDITOR, RESEARCH CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN CLOSED SOCIETIES

Mr. HRUBY. Mr. Chairman, thank you very much for inviting me

to testify before this committee.

In our written testimony, Mrs. Hruby, at my side, and I attempted to outline some of the problems facing religious believers in the

U.S.S.R. May I ask you to include the written text of our testimony

in the record of this hearing.

Senator SIMPSON. Without objection.

Mr. HRUBY. Even diligent study of official and underground materials, however, does not answer all questions about the actual situation of religion in the U.S.S.R. On the basis of estimates and extrapolations, the number of Soviet citizens practicing religion is set

at more than 100 million, that is at least 10 times more than the

membership of the Communist Party. Yet, the Communist Party

holds all the power, and the believers have no representation in

any of the Governmental or elective bodies.

We do not know a single practicing Christian, Jew, Moslem, or

Buddhist serving in federal, state, provincial, or local offices, teaching in colleges and universities, or engaged in scientific research,

and so on.

Atheism is an integral part of Marxist-Leninist ideology, and as

such it is imposed on every citizen in the place of work, in the

school, in the media, and even in private.

Standard methods of education in the spirit of communism practiced in Gulag Archipelago have not been abolished to this day.

Our report mentions the case of an 83-year-old Adventist leader,

Rev. Vladimir Shelkov, sentenced to 5 years of hard labor for

purely religious activity.

There are other clergymen recently victimized by the Soviet

system, above all Orthodox priests and laymen, and several Catholic priests murdered in Lithuania, where religious persecution is at

its peak. The Soviet Government is trying to prevent the religious

infection in Poland from spreading to the U.S.S.R.

Since 1962, Mrs. Hruby and I have followed the plight and the

efforts to emigrate, which we document in our publication RCDA•

Religion in Communist Dominated Areas. Unfortunately, it was

very difficult to interest our public, media, and even our denominations in the Soviet Christian emigration movement.

Shortly after the arrival of seven members of the Vashchenko

and Chmykhalov families in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, we took

up their case and tried to find support for them, but it was not

until Senator Carl Levin had visited them in their basement room

in the Embassy that we found a man of stature, influence and generosity, who was willing to help not only in words, but also in

deeds.

He addressed an appeal to Chairman Brezhnev requesting emigration permits for the Siberian Seven and their families. The

letter was signed by 50 Senators, but the Soviet leader never an-
131

swered. At that point, we suggested the possibility of a special bill,

and Senator Levin graciously considered the idea, and authored a

bill for the relief of the Chmykhalovs and Vashchenkos.

Soviet spokesmen declared that the Vashchenkos and Chmykhalovs are not their, Soviet, problem. They are an American problem.

In a way, they are right. The Americans were unable to resolve the

problem, only to prolong the status quo.

The Soviets enjoy watching the frustration of the Embassy officials and the suffering of the Siberian Seven. They keep their eye

on them. About 200 Soviet nationals are employed by the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, and all of them must report to the KGB what

they do, and what they see and hear in the compound.

Next door to the Siberian Seven is a barber shop and beauty

parlor manned by Valentina, a Soviet woman reputed to be a colonel in the KGB. Her extracurricular activity is to make the life of

the Siberian Seven as miserable as possible. She also keeps tabs on

their visitors.

The Soviets are not interested in terminating the protracted

misery of the two families in the near future. However, S. 312 can

persuade them that it is counterproductive, as well as damaging to

their image, to continue their callow game.

By now, millions of people throughout the world know about the

"Siberian Seven." The defeat of this bill would mean a serious psychological blow not only to the Chmykhalovs and Vashchenkos, but

to all of us who are trying to help them, and also to millions of

believers on both sides of the Iron Curtain.

It would greatly hurt the credibility of the U.S. policy concerning

the defense of religious freedom and human rights. By the same

token, it would encourage the Communist governments to intensify

repression of religious freedom and human rights.

The passage of S. 312 will not only improve the very precarious

situation of the "Siberian Seven," but also strengthen the faith and

hope of all persecuted, and demonstrate the determination of the

Senate of the United States to defend and protect human rights

wherever and whenever they are violated.

In this spirit, we ask you, Mr. Chairman, and members of the

subcommittee, to endorse the bill. By doing so, you will vote for

human rights and freedom of religion everywhere.

Thank you very much.

[Prepared statement of Rev. and Mrs. Hruby follows:]
132

PREPARED STATEMENT OF REV. & tits* B. S. HRUBY

Mr. Chairman, distinguished members of the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and Refugee Policy, ladies and gentlemen:

We consider it great honor and privilege to testify in support of bill S. 312 for the

relief of members of the Chmykhalov and Vashchenko families, courageous Pentecostalist from Siberia, who have been living for more than three years in the U.S.

Embassy in Moscow.

We are proud that the idea for this bill originated in our organization. As a

matter of fact, we have been involved in the case of these believers long before their

arrival in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow: since the early 1960's we publicized their

persistent efforts to obtain permission for emigration from the USSR because of

demonstrable religious persecution.

Documentation concerning the Christian emigration movement in the USSR was

just one part of our work-"compilation of records, processing, translating and

publishing authentic documents -- from official sources and from underground or

samizdat -- concerning the situation of human rights and religious freedom in the

Communist countries. We do not focus on Evangelical Christians alone; we are

equally concerned about the Jews, Catholics, Russian Orthodox, Moslems, Buddhists

and other believers as well as nonbelievers persecuted for their convictions. Our

interest in human rights is particularly keen because of our personal experience with

Nazism, fascism and Communism. I myself have been three times a refugee and

for that reason, I am grateful to God for having found freedom and home for myself

and my family in this country.

Since 1962 I and my wife championed human rights and religious freedom in our

publication RCDA-Religion in Communist Dominated Areas, published now under the

auspices of the Research Center for Religion and Human Rights in Closed Societies,

Ltd. Thus, we promoted the case of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Andrei Sakharov, Rev.

Georgi Vins, Anatoly Shcharansky, Ida Nudel, Father Gleb Yakunin, Alexander Ginzburg

--to name just few of the best known dissidents in the USSR. However, we are working just as assiduously for religious and political dissidents in other totalitarian

countries, particularly for individuals who are less known, less glamorous and less

likely to attract international attention.

The objectives of our efforts are not always correctly understood. Many people

believe that quiet diplomacy is far more efficient than publicity of violations of human

rights; of course, those people have never been inmates of prisons, psychiatric

hospitals and labor camps in Communist countries. The victims of persecution

are less than enthusiastic about quiet diplomacy; they regard publicity in the West

as their only hope for survival. Here I should like to point out the testimonies of

Vladimir Bukovsky, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and others. We should remember the

millions of Jews herded into gas chambers by the Nazis during World War II. They

went silently and perished. The survivors, however, learned not to accept martyrdom without protest. Thus, shortly after Stalin's death the Jewish emigration movement was launched in Leningrad in 1958 and challenged Soviet anti-Semitism. The

Christian emigration movement was organized along the same lines in early 1960's.

The two efforts are parallel, not contradictory, and many of their participants cooperate. Their results, however, are most dissimilar.

Emigration of Soviet Jews is progressing steadily, despite many obstructions,

problems, suffering and sacrifices, while Christian emigration from the USSR is

practically nonexistent. An expert of the Department of State estimates that there

are some 50, 000 Soviet Evangelicals who have applied for exit from the USSR. To

the best of our knowledge, less than ten (10) families emigrated since 1962. Even

if ten times or hundred times as many were permitted to leave the USSR during

those years, those numbers would still be insignificant.

One of those families, the Gorelkins, were permitted to emigrate to Canada about

2 years ago. Please note that Vasily Ivanovich Gorelkin was born in Harbin, China,

and naturalized in Canada. In 1955 he came to visit his family in the USSR with the

intention to spend there one month, but was detained against his will for 24 years.

During that time he married and raised ten children. Prior to the Gorelkins' departure, one of their sons, Simon, married Ludmila Malamura who has been trying to

join her husband in Canada since 1979. Her whole family in Tapa, Estonian Soviet
133

Socialist Republic, applied for exit visas and have been refused emigration on a number of occasions, despite the fact that at least in Ludmila'e case it is a question of

family reunification.

Soviet Office of Visa and Emigration (OVIR) frequently insists that only those individuals who have blood relatives in the West apply for exit visas. This regulation

is not always considered; we have numerous examples among Jewish refuseniks (including Ida Nudel, the piano virtuoso Vladimir Feltsman and others) as well as among

Soviet Christians. For instance, The wife of Peter Vashchenko's cousin, Gregory,

has a sister and several other relatives residing in West Germany. The Gregory

Vashchenkos have been petitioning for emigration for the past nine years. The OVIR

fails to consider the fact that Olga Ludvigovna Vashchenko is ethnic German and thus,

eligible for emigration. The overriding factor in their case is the fact that the

Vashchenkos are Evangelical activists.

There are cases where blood relations are not required for exit permit. Here

we should like to mention the family of Mr. and Mrs. Stanislav Zherdev, sculptors

and Pentecostal believers. Slava Zherdev, one of the leaders of the Pentecostal

emigration movement, decided to protest against religious discrimination by refusing to vote and by announcing hunger strike at the occasion of the Moscow Olympics

in the summer of 1980. This action prompted the OVIR to issue the family permit

to emigrate to Israel--although the ZherdevB have no kith nor kin outside the USSR.

There was, however. Catch 22: the night before their scheduled departure Mrs.

Zherdev's mother, a Communist fanatic, abducted the eldest of the Zherdev's

seven children, 10-year old Sergey. The Soviet authorities, obviously aware of

the plot, refused to locate the child.

The Zherdevs were faced with a dilemma: their passports listed seven children

and without Sergey, the family would not be permitted to leave. On the other hand,

if they stayed in the USSR, they would never get another chance to emigrate and in

all probability, would never see Sergey again; moreover, they might be deprived

of their parental rights to their other children. In their predicament they accepted

the offer of a fellow Christian, Galina Ukhtomskaya, who let them take abroad her

10-year old son, Pavel, instead of Sergey. Thus, she jeopardized her future in

order to enable Pavel to live in the free world. The switch went unnoticed at the airport and the Zherdevs safely reached Vienna and later Sweden.

Galina Ukhtomskaya held a press conference at which she explained the grounds

for her decision and expressed her desire to emigrate with her older son, a victim

of cerebral palsy. The attention and support of their friends in the West, including

our Research Center, resulted in Mrs. Ukhtomskayars emigration. She and her

two sons are now living in Sweden. Unfortunately, young Sergey Zherdev is still in

the USSR, subjected to intensive Communist indoctrination, or "re-education in the

spirit of Communism" which many children from Christian families have to endure.

Thus, three of the Vashchenko girls were separated from their family for six

years. Two years ago, Galina Rytikova, a member of the Baptist church in Moscow,

, lost custody of her children because she had been teaching them religion. In the

'autumn of 1980 Maria Drumova, a Baptist from Izmail, province of Odessa, was

deprived of her 12-year old daughter Maria and her 4-year old son Alexander for

the same reason. There are many more similar tragedies on record.

Even when left with their parents, children of believers are victims of particularly harsh treatment in school. Communist indoctrination begins early, in the

kindergarten, and compulsory study of atheism soon fol lows. It is the teacher's

duty to "persuade" both students and their parents of the fallacy of religious faith.

Teachers get demerits for each pupil in the class known to be a believer or the

child of believers, and it is up to the teacher to convert the whole family to MarxiBmLeninism. This means visits to the family on "person-to-person" basis, in other

words, an additional burden for the teacher who then uses with impunity every means

of less than gentle persuasion. Children are humiliated in the classroom. Teachers

frequently entice their fellow students to gang up against the believers, torment them

and beat them. Thus, young Ivan Migashkin of Tapa, Estonia, has lost hearing in

one ear following assaults and stoning by his classmates. His older brothers were

seriously injured by their fellow students and beaten severely by their school principal. The Migashkins have joined the Christian emigration movement.

The cruelty against children helps intimidate many parents. Another factor

weighing heavily on their minds is the future of their children: all but elementary

education is closed to them. Thus, they are doomed to menial labor, inferior housing, and poverty.

Even mutual assistance or Christian charity is prohibited by law. Soviet authorities classify it as "religious propaganda" which, unlike atheistic propaganda, is
134

strictly forbidden. Thus, Lilia Belysheva, a 30-year old Christian from Nakhodka

in the Far East, took a group of 10- and 12-year old girls from Pentecostal families

to clean the house of an 82-year old Pentecostal lady. They were scrubbing the floors

and washing the woodwork when a whole detachment of police arrived and arrested

them all. After hours of interrogation in the police station the girls, frightened out

of their wits, were released with warning, and Lilia was fined 50 rubles "for violation of the Regulation on Religious Rituals, namely, for help to an old woman, " as

specified on the official receipt.

There is no appeal. Laws and regulations are interpreted arbitrarily by the officials in charge.

Christians do not face adversity and persecution only at a young age. The old

and disabled are not exempt from brutality perpetrated by the Soviets. Last year

59-year old Pentecostal bishop Nikolai Goretoi was tried for his religious activity

and sentenced to 7 years at hard labor to be followed by 5 years in internal exile.

Goretoi is blind.

Rev. Vladimir Shelkov, the leader of the Adventist church, had spent 25 of his

83 years in prisons and labor camps. In his last years he lived in seclusion, writing

purely religious sermons and prayers. In March 1979 he was brought to court on

charges that while living in a basement room without electricity he had forged Soviet

passports. There was no official explanation of this exceptional accomplishment --

83-year old man forges passports in an underground cubicle, in the candlelight!

The absurdity of such charges aside. Rev. Shelkov was sentenced to 5 years at hard

labor. He served only 5 months in the labor camp. He died in Yakutsk, Siberia, in

January 1980 at the age of 84.

Among the inmates of Siberian labor camps are numerous practicing Christians,

particularly conscientious objectors who refused induction in the Red Army because

they would not pledge allegiance to an atheistic government. The penalty is 3 years

and up at hard labor. In the camps conscientious objectors are handpicked for special

punishment. Thus, for instance, the Vashchenkos' son, Alexander (Sasha), was assigned to a group of homosexual prisoners, the most despised and ostracized inmates

in the camp. The idea was to humiliate Sasha and expose him to physical brutality.

For the slightest infraction of the rules, more frequency imagined or invented

than real, Christian inmates are subjected to additional penalties, especially incarceration in the dreaded "solitary," unheated cubicles without beds and bedding, with

food rations consisting of less than one lb of bread and one pint of tepid soup issued

every other day. In Siberia prisoners usually succumb to TB and other chronic diseases after several weeks of this treatment. To name just one: young conscientious

objector, Vladimir Frolov, an Adventist, contracted TB in the solitary in the Siberian

labor camp of Khairiuzovka.

Last year that same camp was decimated by anthrax-like epidemic allegedly

brought in by a group of prisoners transferred from the Sverdlovsk area following

the very much discussed incident possibly connected with preparations for biological

warfare.

Service in the armed forces does not necessarily guarantee Christians and Jews

humane treatment. Again, believers are subjected to various kinds of torment. In

1972 Ivan Moyseyev, a practicing Christian eager to share his spiritual belief with

his fellow soldiers, died under mysterious circumstances, his body horribly mutilated.

Christians and Jews in the USSR cannot associate freely. If they meet privately

for prayer or worship, the home of their host may be confiscated. In most cases

the police just collect fines from the participants, usually 2 weeks' salary of the

breadwinner, but pensioners may lose a considerable part of their annual income

for nothing more than praying with their friends.

Yet Soviet Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to believe or not to

believe. It also guarantees the right of antireligious propaganda, but not of religious

propaganda or teaching. The Constitution allegedly separates the church from the

state and the state from the church, which should prevent any intervention on the part

of the state and government in the matters of citizens1faith, family and worship. In

reality it is not so. Soviet laws put the churches in complete servitude and control

all their activities. They demand that every congregation be registered with the

state and supervised by the authorities, i.e., the Communist party. Clergymen and

all employees of the church, members of board of deacons and trustees, elders and

other church officials must be approved by the State Council on Religious Affairs

which is staffed from top to bottom by Communist officials trained in atheistic propaganda. It censors in advance sermons of the clergy and approves every church

program. Its decisions cannot be appealed.
135

The extent of the strangulation perpetrated by this official body comes to light

in the secret report to the Presidium of the CPSU written by V. Furov, deputy chairman of the State Council on Religious Affairs. The report which has been smuggled

out from the USSR last year is published in our journal RCDA--RELIGION IN COMMUNIST DOMINATED AREAS.

Many Christians reject this control of churches and insist on the letter of the

law according to which the state is separated from the church and vice versa. These

believers are defying the authorities and take enormous risks. Since a new atheistic

campaign was announced in the USSR in 1979, numerous leaders and members of

Evangelical churches were arrested and sentenced on charges of religious activities

(often presented as "anti-state activities" or "subversion"). The campaign is broadbased and very costly and those involved in it must show some results. Thus, a new

wave of persecution and harassment has been unleashed, yet the system cannot annihilate all religious congregations. It is evident that the hardship has made the

believers much stronger and determined to demand their rights.

The campaign against religious believers, whether from the registered or unregistered churches, uses extremely dirty tricks; it recycled the worn-out antiSemitic myth about ritual murder and adapted it to Evangelicals. The sad thing is

that many Soviet citizens actually believe it.

For instance, the mother of Nadia Zherdev became hysterical when she learned

that her daughter and son-in-law were converted. The old lady, a dedicated Communist, sincerely believed that as Christians, the Zherdevs would sacrifice their babies

to God.

A young Pentecostalist from Moscow wrote in a letter smuggled from the USSR:

"You may already know about our desire to emigrate from the USSR because of religious persecution. My husband was expelled from an art college for his belief, and

barely avoided expulsion from the Institute of Art in Moscow, again for being a

Christian; by God's grace he managed to graduate, though with lower marks.

Three other members of the same group of Christians were thrown out in their

fifth year of study.

"We Christians have no right to profess our faith, no right to bring up our

children in Christian faith; we are like outcasts and lepers to the people around us.

Official propaganda portrays UB as a debilitating, dangerous sect that makes sacrifice of children's blood, etc. At the same time we are living behind an iron wall.

We are not allowed to leave the USSR, to emigrate.

"I do not know if you've heard about the demonstrated on March 8th when 11

women expressed their wish to emigrate and protested against the discrimination

of Christians. Yet we were not granted permission to leave the USSR. On several

occasions I went to the Department of Visa and Emigration (OVIR) without any success.

Officials told me more than once that in order to get exit visa I must have an invitation from relatives abroad. If your church would accept us strangers in the name of

Christ, I'd be delighted beyond measure. I should like to ask for an invitation for

another Christian sister, Galina, a teacher of disabled children. Because of her

religious persuasion she has been banned from her profession and is working as a

washerwoman."

It is axiomatic that all Soviet Christians, or even Evangelicals, cannot emigrate,

but neither do all Soviet Jews wish to emigrate. Once their grievances are made

known and their human rights upheld in the free world, the Soviet system will be

forced into recognizing them and their demands.

Those 50, 000 wishing to emigrate should be given the opportunity to leave the

USSR. Many of them would like to go to Israel, Canada, West Europe or other

countries in the West, not necessarily the USA. They would be an asset for any

society. These are very diligent, upright, honest, courageous, highly moral

people who do not seek economic advantages but religious freedom.

Please note that the Soviet Jews who emigrated to the USA have become valuable

members of our society. The same applies for Soviet Christians. They may not be

glamorous but it is certain that they would not contribute to crime, illegitimacy,

alcoholism or juvenile delinquency, nor would they become burden for us.

This hearing concerns only two families among many, the tip of an iceberg.

These seven persons have lived in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow since June 1978

not because of their own will but due to circumstances. They cannot go back and

expect that they will survive. Two Soviet citizens, Nazorov and Lesnov, who had

recently entered the Moscow Embassy without Soviet permission, have been imprisoned after a very brief meeting with U.S. officials. The Vashchenkos and
136

Chmykhalovs issued itttementi and provided information which the Soviets regard

as damaging to the USSR, in other words, ai treaion. The punishment ia death --

sometimes by execution, soxre times by slow agony, as in the case of Anatoly

Shcharansky and the two Christian defendents in the infamous Leningrad trial,

Alexey Murzhenko and Yuri Fedorov.

The bill under discussion, so eloquently proposed by Senator Carl Levin, will

ensure the five Vashchenkos and two Chmykhalovs a modicum of security and

raise their chance that the Soviet government will finally realize how counterproductive

it ia to hold these people against their will. They are not essential for the glorious

future of the Soviet empire. In the midst of their profound economic and spiritual

crisis the Soviets must come to grips with reality and adopt the code of civilized

behavior in terms of human rights and religious freedom. It does not come naturally

to them but they learn if they have to.

We must come to grips with reality just as well and realize that the Soviets will

never make concessions on their own. We must support the believers in the USSR --

the Orthodox, Catholics, Protestant, Evangelicals, Jews, Moslems, Buddhists --

because they adhere to non-Marxist ideology despite more than 60 years of intensive

and often extremely ruthless religious persecution.

For that reason bill S. 312 is a landmark in our legislation. It will not serve

as a precedent--from the very inception it was articulated so as to avoid that--but

as a clear statement of the magnanimity of the USA, an inspiration to captive nations

and to the Confessing Church, and a light of hope to those languishing in Gulags and

other places of human degradation.

Senator SIMPSON. Thank you for a very powerful statement, sir.

We very much appreciate it.

Kent Hill, please.

STATEMENT OF KENT R. HILL, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF

HISTORY, SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY

Dr. HILL. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Before beginning, I would like to note that the text you have

before you is an abbreviated and modified version of my original

draft. Mr. Chairman, I would like to request that this text and the

attached article from Christianity Today be included in the written

record.

Senator SIMPSON. Without objection, so ordered.

Dr. HILL. One of the most often expressed reservations about

granting the "Siberian Seven" permanent resident alien status is

the fear that we would be establishing a precedent for turning our

Embassies into refugee centers. However, if all of the facts were

publicized, it would become obvious that this is such an extraordinary case that it could be dealt with in a very special way without

establishing the much-feared precedent.

What are these unpublicized facts which justify the special treatment provided for by S. 312?

First, it should be made absolutely clear that these Christians

from Siberia came to the Moscow Embassy to visit, not to demand

asylum pending the reception of Soviet emigration visas.

Second, they came to the Embassy to discuss their problems in

emigration. They brought with them a letter written in 1975 by

American consular officials expressly requesting that they keep the

Embassy informed regarding developments in their protracted efforts to emigrate.

Thus, when the Soviet militia barred their entrance to the Embassy and physically abused John Vashchenko at the very gates of

the American Embassy, it was the Soviets who were at fault, not
137

the visitors. It was the Soviet violence which turned their visit into

a desperate plea for refuge.

Third, the Siberian Seven cannot leave the safety of the American Embassy to return to Soviet society without subjecting themselves and their families to grave personal danger. I do not believe

this reality can be overemphasized.

I was in Moscow during those first frightening days when we

awaited news regarding the fate of John Vashchenko. I was with

them during that tortuous early period when it was not certain

whether the Americans would continue to shelter them, when

there was the very real fear that they would be forcibly ejected

from the Embassy.

I examined the documents they brought to the Embassy•prison

sentences, official search reports, detailed descriptions of harassments of every sort which lasted for several decades. I translated

hundreds of pages of documentation they supplied. I know these

people. I know what they have suffered at the hands of the Soviet

authorities, and I know the fate which awaits them just outside the

American Embassy gates.

There is no greater crime in the Soviet Union than to slander

the Soviet state. Slander, of course, is defined as anything which

does not bring credit to the state. Unfortunately, this means that

any honest assessment of the extent of persecution of religious believers is considered slanderous.

The Siberian Seven have provided the Free World with one of

the most extensive accounts of religious persecution to have

emerged in recent years. My translations alone totaled over 200,000

words, only a portion of which is recounted in John Pollock's book

"The Siberian Seven." They have literally risked everything to tell

their story, which is also the story of many thousands of other believers in the Soviet Union.

We cannot turn our back on them now. We have allowed the Siberian Seven refuge in our Embassy for almost 3 Vz years. The very

least we can do, at this late date, is to recognize that the families

can never leave the sanctuary of the Embassy without Soviet exit

visas in hand.

The State Department argues that passage of S. 312 would interfere with its ability to resolve this case. For 3V2 years we have

waited in vain for the State Department to act in a decisive and

convincing manner in support of these families. It has not done so

and we are no closer to a solution today than we were 3V2 years

ago. This bill cannot halt progress which is not being made.

It was stated in testimony earlier today that perhaps in a closed

session you might hear of other developments in this case. But I

can assure you the sort of information you will hear has to do with

high-level negotiations, which have occurred under both the Carter

and the Reagan administrations. I would point out that talk at this

point is rather cheap. Until we are willing to put some teeth

behind our negotiators, we are not going to resolve this case. If we

are really committed to protecting them in the Embassy, why the

hesitancy to put these guarantees into legal form?

The State Department asserts that we would irritate the Soviets

and therefore make it impossible to resolve the case. Sometimes I
138

wonder who makes our policy•is it the Soviets? Do we really allow

them to determine how we treat people within our own Embassy?

It is bad enough that we allow the Soviets to dictate access policy

to our Embassy, and unthinkable that we would permit them to

make decisions regarding our own conduct within the Embassy.

The time has come to take action, to grant the Siberian Seven

some real guarantees to protect them from arbitrary changes in

treatment within the Embassy. It is no wonder the Soviets have

done nothing. We cannot expect them to take this case seriously

when we have not taken it seriously.

The State Department fears offending the Soviets and thereby

jeopardizing the case. But the evidence is conclusive that speaking

out and taking firm action did not endanger Georgi Vins, Alexandr

Solzhenitsyn, and dozens of other Soviet dissidents who have obtained freedom to the West. On the contrary, it was their only protection. It was, in fact, their ticket to freedom. S. 312 may very well

be an important first step to freedom for the Siberian Seven. Let us

not hesitate to take it.

[Prepared statement of Dr. Hill follows:]
139

PREPARED STATEMENT OF KENT R. HILL

One of the most often expressed reservations about granting the "Siberian

Seven" permanent resident alien status is the fear that we would be establishing a precedent for turning our embassies into refugee centers. However,

if all of the facts were publicized, it would become obvious that this is

such an extraordinary case that it could be dealt with in a very special

way without establishing the much-feared precedent.

What are these unpublicized facts which justify the special treatment

provided for by S. 312?

First, it should be made absolutely clear that these Christians from

Siberia came to the Moscow Embassy to VISIT, not to demand asylum pending

the reception of Soviet emigration visas.

Second, they came to the embassy to discuss their problems in emigration.

They brought with them a letter written in 1975 by American consular officials

expressly requesting that they keep the embassy informed regarding developments in their protracted efforts to emigrate.

Thus, when the Soviet militia barred their entrance to the embassy

and physically abused John Vashchenko in the very gates of the American

Embassy, it was the Soviets who were at fault, not the visitors. It was

the Soviet violence which turned their visit into a desperate plea for

refuge.

Third, the "Siberian Seven" cannot leave the safety of the American

Embassy to return to Soviet society without subjecting themselves and

their familes to grave personal danger. I do not believe this reality

can be overemphasized. I was in Moscow during those first frightening

days when we awaited news regarding the fate of John Vashchenko. I was

with them during that torturous early period when it was not certain whether
140

the Americans would continue to shelter them, when there was the very real

fear that they would be forcibly ejected from the embassy. I examined the

documents they brought to the embassy•prison sentences, official-search

reports, detailed descriptions of harassments of every sort endured for

several decades. 1 translated hundreds of pages of the documentation they

supplied. I know these people. I know what they have suffered at the hands of

the Soviet authorities, and 1 know the fate which awaits them just outside

the American Embassy gates.

There is no greater crime in the Soviet Union than to slander the

Soviet state. Slander, of course, is defined as anything which does not

bring credit on the state. Unfortunately, this means that any honest

assessment of the extent of persecution of religious believers is considered

"slanderous." The "Siberian Seven" have provided the free world with one

of the most extensive accounts of religious persecution to have emerged

in recent years. My translations alone totaled over 200,000 words, only

a portion of which is recounted in John Pollock's book The Siberian Seven.

They have literally risked everything to tell their story, which is also

the story of many thousands of other believers in the Soviet Union.

We cannot turn our back on them now. We have allowed the "Siberian

Se-en" refuge in our embassy for almost 3% years. The very least we can

do, at this late date, is to recognize that the families can never leave

the sanctuary of the embassy without Soviet exit visas in hand.

The State Department argues that passage of S. 312 would interfere

wit'i its ability to resolve this case. For 3% years we have waited in vain

for the State Department to act in a decisive and convincing manner in

support of these families. Tt has not done so and we are no closer to a

solution today than we were 3h years ago. This bill cannot halt progress

which is not being made.
141

The State Department asserts that we would irritate the Soviets and

therefore make it impossible to resolve the case. Sometimes I wonder who

makes our policy•is it the Soviets? Do we really allow them to determine

how we treat people within our own embassy? It is bad enough that we allow

the Soviets to dictate access policy to our embassy} and unthinkable that

we would permit them to make decisions regarding our own conduct within

the embassy.

The time has come to take action•to grant the "Siberian Seven" some

real guarantees to protect them from arbitrary changes in treatment within

the embassy. It is no wonder the Soviets have done nothing. We cannot expect them to take this case seriously when we have not taken it seriously.

The State Department fears offending the Soviets and thereby jeopardizing

the case. But the evidence is conclusive that speaking out and taking firm

action did not endanger Georgi Vins, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and dozens of

other Soviet dissidents. On the contrary, it was their only protection;

it was, in fact, their ticket to freedom. S. 312 may very well be an

important first step to freedom for the "Siberian Seven." Let us not

hesitate to take it.

*Kent R. Hill is Assistant Professor of History at Seattle Pacific

University in Seattle, Washington.
142

lijifeg

Reprinted with permission by: CSI-ZURICH

12906 Matey Road

Wheaton, MD 20906 USA

Copyright 1981 - Christianity Today

After Three Long Years: Glimmers of

Movement in 'Siberian Seven'Impasse

American policy toward embassyguests warms, and European support builds.

For an update en the situation of the

seven Pentecostal beliewrs confined in the

American Embassy in Moscow, CHRJSTIAWTY TODAY turned to Kent R. Hill, the

assistant professor of history at Seattle

Pacific University who was in Moscow

when theyfirst made their dashforfreedom. He translated the voluminous written narrative ofthe seven into Englishfor

biographer John Pollock and became

theirfriend.

When the "Siberian Seven" arrived at the

American embassy in Moscow on June

27, 1976, they were seeking assistance in

emigrating from the Sqviet Union on

grounds of religious persecution. They

expected their visit to be short. It was not.

The brutality ofSoviet militia stationed in

front of die embassy transformed a brief

visit into a desperate plea for asylum. The

de facto asylum that resulted recently entered its fourth year, and there is still no

diplomatic solution in sight.

The diplomatic stalemate could immediately be resolved ifdie Soviets would

simply grant the Vaschenko and

Chmykhalov families (including members at home in Siberia as well as those in

the embassy) the necessary emigration

visas. Soviet refusal to cooperate in this

matter could perhaps have been expected. What was not expected was U.S.

reluctance actively to support the case.

Nevertheless, for over two-and-a-half

years, the U.S. Department ofState and its

embassy in Moscow seemed far more

concerned with convincing the refugees

to leave the safe confines ofthe American

compound than in pressuring the Soviets

to grant them their freedom. Since about

February 1981, however, there has been

a very encouraging change of attitude on

the part ofthe American embassy.

Not only have the Siberian Seven suffered from the initial refusal of American

government authorities to pursue their

case actively, they have also suffered from

the neglect and apathy of the American

church community. Many thousands of

individual American Christians have

given support at the grassroots level, and

a few organizations and journals have

lent support. But most Christian leaders

and organizations in this country have

chosen to remain silent. In large part that

explains why the Siberian Seven are still

almost completely unknown to die major32 11205)

ity of American Christians. In contrast,

European Christians have been much

more responsive to the desperate plight of

these victims of Soviet religious persecution.

A successful resolution to this diplomatic stalemate may depend on the willingness of the government and the Christian community at large in this country to

join with their European counterparts in

putting pressure on die Soviets to release

the Siberian Seven and their families.

Their fate may well hang in the balance.

First, we must review how the Americans handled the situation during die

first two-and-a-half years, the period

when the Siberian Seven could best be de:

scribed as unwanted guests in die U.S.

Embassy in Moscow. From the first,

American officials repeatedly asserted

that the State Department and Moscow

embassy were doing everything they

could to encourage the Soviets to grant

die Vashchenk06 and Chymkhalovs permission to emigrate. Furthermore, U.S.

and embassy officials always maintained

that the Siberian Seven would not be

forced to leave the embassy.

There were persistent reports, however, both in this country and abroad,

thai the actual U.S. policy was to discourage the families from staying. The embassy deliberately minimized publicity

and deprived the families of free contact

with those who were willing to provide

them with moral support. For many

months, consular officers repeatedly denied permission to many members of die

diplomatic community in Moscow, as

well as numerous visitors from the West,

to meet with the families. A variety of

firsthand observers have continued that

die embassy refused to allow correspondents to interview the families in the

Maria and Timothy Climvkhalov.

room where they live, refused to allow the

news media to photograph or film them

in their room, and maintained a limited

access list of those permitted to see the

families.

In a concerted effort to isolate as much

as possible the Siberian Seven from the

support of Christians in the West, embassy officials even refused to show the

families, copies of letters sent via international mail•rather than by diplomatic

pouch, at the American embassy's insistence•die originals of which had been

confiscated by the Soviets. The U.S. government's policy during this period,

though it physically maintained the

familes at the Moscow embassy, clearly

was unsupportive and at times bordered

on outright harassment.

The coolness of American policy toward the Russian refugees did provoke

some reaction in the West, though not

much. Kevin Lynch wrote several articles

for National Review (Aug. 31, 1979; Mar.

21,1980; April 3,1961), documenting the

negative side of American policy toward

the Siberian Seven. Vladimir Bukovsky,

the well-known Soviet dissident, attacked

U.S. harassment ofthe Siberian Seven in a

letter to the editors of Time, printed in its

issue ofJune 4, 1979. Bukovsky, best

known in the West for his role in exposing die Soviet practice ofusing psychiatric

hospitals as political prisons, continued

his assault on U.S. policy in mid-1979 in

an address to die Coalition for a Democratic Majority.

Few Americans, however, ever became

aware of U.S. policy regarding die Siberian Seven. Many still did not know who

they were, let alone how they were being

treated.

The Siberian Seven have requested

political asylum in die embassy because

they fear for their lives. Since arriving at

the embassy, 1,500 pages of their autobiographies and documents have been

translated into English and formed the

basis for The Siberian Seven, written by

John Pollock, Published by Word, this

276-page volume is one of the bestdocumented accounts of the persecution

ofChristians by the Soviet government.

The struggle of the Siberian Seven to

emigrate to die West spans almost two

decades and encompasses almost all of

die types of sufferings that Christians behind the Iron Curtain have had to bear:

CHRISTIANITY TODAY
143

Feta- and Augurtlna V

violent disruption of church services,

abduction of children from Christian parents for placement in state orphanages,

confinement in labor camps and psychiatric hospitals, and mysterious deaths.

Pollock's book provides numerous examples of die petty harassments that are a

daily occurrence for several million Russian Christians. The official papers provided by the Siberian Seven impressively

corroborate and highlight a wide variety

of sources already available in the West

on the conditions ofChristians behind the

Iron Curtain.

Now that the families have allowed

their account of Soviet persecution to be

published in the West, they have no

alternative but to remain in the embassy

until their case is favorably resolved. On

Jury 27, former British Foreign Secretary

David Owen summed up the plight ofthe

refugees as follows:

"The Siberian Seven are a very good example of the gravity of die human rights

situation inside the Soviet Union, and I

have long supported both publicly and

privately that they should be allowed out

ofthe Soviet Union. I do not think there is

any way mat they could return to their

families without fear of persecution and

harassment.

In view of the real danger that awaits

the refugees outside die American embassy, how can we account for the tireless

efforts of U.S. officials to convince the

families to leave it?

A major factor that certainly contributed to the government's initial reluctance

to publicize this highly unusual story,

especially during the early months of the

group's stay in die embassy, was the fear

that die Senate ratification of the SALT II

agreement would be jeopardized. It was

assumed that Soviet violation of agreements guaranteeing freedom of religion

and emigration would call into question

the whole issue of Soviet trustworthiness

on new international agreements. With

the failure of SALT II to be ratified by the

Senate and the election of a more conservative president and Congress, this

particular impediment to support and

publicity was removed,

A second factor is the view that it is not

in the best interests of the U.S. to intervene. If the U.S. government actively intercedes with the Soviet government on

behalf of these seven Christians, will not

SEPTEMBER 18,1961

Lid*. Lyuba, and LUa Vaachmko. John WM aetaed by IN- Soviet militia.

American embassies throughout the

Communist world be deluged with squatters? This question has been raised from

time to time during the past three years.

The evidence is conclusive, however,

that this particular case need not set a

dangerous precedent. The seven did not

break into the embassy demanding to

emigrate or be given political asylum.

They came with an official letter from

U.S. Embassy officials authorizing their

The Saga ofthe Seven

Here, in barest outline, is the story of

the Siberian Seven.

Peter Vaschenko grew up in a lay

preacher's family driven from its home

and forced to wander for two years before

finding a Siberian village mat tolerated

them. He found it easier to be a secret believer as he went to school and then off to

war. Only after he married and moved to

Chemogorsk did he and his wife, Augustina, become active Christians.

Khrushchev's great persecution caught

up with them in 1961. They were constantly harassed inside and outside the

church. Three of their children were

abducted and placed in a state school to

be indoctrinated in atheism.

This was the last straw for Vaschenko.

He took his family and some others to

Moscow and applied for exit visas. The

authorities called them crazy and sent

them home. Peter was imprisoned.

Shortly after, in 1963, his wife and

three ofhis children were among 32 Siberian Christians who rushed into the

American embassy in Moscow and

begged for help in securing permission to

leave Russia. They were eventually persuaded by Soviet officials to return home

and await legal papers. But once back in

Siberia, the believers were arrested and

punished.

During the years ofpersecution that ensued, (he Vaschenko family still hoped

authorities would grant them permission

to emigrate. They managed two more

cross-continent trips to the embassy in

1968 and 1975. When they received a

mail invitation, or oner ofsponsorship, in

April 1976, they laid plans for their final

attempt, and were joined by two mem-.

bers ofthe Climykhalov family. Q

entry into the embassy to discuss emigra

tn in. It was only when the Soviet militia in

front of the embassy refused to honor the

letter that the situation fundamentally

changed. The apprehension and subsequent abuse ofJohn Vashchenko was the

incident that turned a routine visit to the

embassy into a desperate plea for asylum.

The fives of these people are in grave

danger if they leave the embassy. This is

the internationally recognized justification for seeking and obtaining political

asylum. If the U.S. government simply

points out the highly unusual circumstances that compelled the families to remain in the embassy, and particularly the

fact that they came with a written invitation, men it can vigorously pursue securing emigration for these refugees without

fear of establishing a precedent for allowing unwarranted embassy sit-ins.

Government policy relative to the Siberian Seven never became a major campaign issue in the recent presidential

elections. However, during a radio commentary in 1979, Ronald Reagan did

criticize the Carter administration's

handling of the situation. "Detente,"

observed the Republican nominee, "is a

two-way street Our wheat and technology can get into Russia•why can't the

Vaschenko and Chnrykhalov families get

out?"

Fortunately, there has been a clear

change in embassy policy since about

February ofthis year. Correspondents are

now allowed to interview the families in

their quarters, rather than in the courtyard. The access list has been eliminated.

U.S. citizens are allowed to visit the families in their room, and so may foreigners,

provided they first check with die consular section. The seven are now allowed to

socialize with other Americans in their

apartments, which lie within die safety of

the American compound. In addition, the

families are now permitted to do unpaid

work within the embassy. American authorities have been in contact with important Soviet officials, although it is not yet

clear if the negotiations are bearing fruit.

The present embassy handling of the

situation seems to reflect a genuine

change ofattitude.

Efforts to influence the U.S. Congress

have met with partial success. On May 9,

1980,50 senators sent a letter to Brezhnev

requesting that the Vashchenko and

(1206] 33
144

Chmykhalov families be allowed to emigrate. Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan has

been most outspoken on behalf of the

families in the embassy. On June 27,

1960, he introduced S. 2890, a bill mat

would have granted both families

"permanent residence status" in the

United States. The bill would probably

have passed, but it never cleared Sen. Edward Kennedy's Judiciary Committee.

The bill was reintroduced as S. 312 in the

new session and thus far has more man

60 cosponsors. Once more it is hung up

in committee, this time a subcommittee

on immigration. Prospects for passage

are good•if Christians throughout the

United States make it clear to their senators mat they wish it to be supported.

Unfortunately, it is widespread support

by Christians that has been so noticeably

lacking during these past three years. The

original core ofpeople who came in contact in Moscow with the Siberian Seven

have remained steadfast in their efforts to

effect a positive resolution of their quest

for emigration. Others have joined the

campaign and devoted many hours and

days to working on their behalf. The Siberian Seven chronicled the intriguing and

gripping story of fellow believers in desperate need of help, but American Christians have preferred to read other lessdemanding materials that would not

evoke pain.

Then, of course, the Siberian Seven are

Pentecostals, and many are reluctant to

become involved with Pentecostals.

Christians in the West have the luxury of

not having to be united to protect their interests, and so we have made disunity a

virtue. It does not seem to matter mat the

theological issues that separate a Baptist

from a Pentecostal, for example, are infinitesimal!v small in comparison to what

they have in common. Nor does it matter

that behind the Iron Curtain, Soviet officials persecute Russian Orthodox, Baptist, and Pentecostal believers alike

because of their devotion to God, not because they do or do not speak in tongues.

One ofthe most impassioned defenders of

the Siberian Seven, Vladimir Bukovsky, is

not even a Christian. In stark contrast,

Christian leaders and organizations in

this country have often been silent, or at

best, timid.

The response of Christian organizations in the U.S. has been perplexing.

Both "liberal" and "conservative groups

have been unwilling to offer much assistance. The National Council ofChurches,

the Pentecostals, and die Baptists have all

shown a certain reluctance to protest

actively the treatment of Christians behind the Iron Curtain. The reasons for

this reluctance are complex, but basically

revolve around the successful way in

which the Soviet Union has utilized a

policy of allowing "registered" church

leaders to travel in the West.

These officially sponsored leaders tell

American church officials mat there is

34 11207]

-3-

really very lime problem in die Soviet Union with respect to persecution. Besides,

if Americans do protest, it will simply

mean mat even the "registered*' leaders

will be cut off from their Christian

brothers in the West. The Soviet ploy has

proven amazingly successful with rather

gullible church leaders in the West, especially in the U.S.

Nevertheless, there have been some important efforts to aid die Siberian Seven

and publicize their situation. Most Christian organizations in the West that work

with Christians behind the Iron Curtain

or publish materials about them have

sought to make their constituencies

aware oftheir plight Evangelism to Communist Lands included some footage of

die Siberian Seven in a recent film, Let My

People Go. In Texas, Christ for the Nations has furnished considerable help.

The two most important organizations in

the U.S. working on behalf of die seven

Mock and Ms book.

are the Research Center for Religion and

Human Rights in Closed Societies and the

Society of Americans for Vashchenko/

Chmykhalov Emigration (S.A.V.E.). The

latter is headed by Cecil Williamson,

minister of Crescent Hill Presbyterian

Church in Selma, Alabama. It was Williamson and his congregation that sent

the official invitation for die Vashchenkos

to emigrate to America. Jane Drake,

SJ*.V.E. secretary, has worked tirelessly for

many months to keep Christians concerned about the Siberian Seven informed

about recent developments.

The New York-based Research Center

for Religion and Human Rights in Closed

Societies, publisher of the respected journal Religion in Communist Dominated

Areas, has been a crucial nerve center for

die dissemination ofaccurate and current

information on the Siberian Seven. Blaho

and Olga Hruby are die driving forces behind this effort It was in their journal

that the first detailed account ofthe story

ofthe seven appeared in 1978. They have

provided important information and

advice to officials on Capitol Hill and to

s.A-v.E. Olga Hruby has been instrumental

in arranging for English language instruction for the seven and is at present

seeking to set up tutoring in die embassy

dial will lead to high school equivalency

diplomas for several of the young people

who are members ofthe group.

Yet, despite publication ofThe Siberian

Seven, despite the selfless efforts ofseveral

hundred Americans, millions of Christians in this country have not been

reached or motivated to action. Considerably more success has been achieved in

Europe.

The most important organization to

support the campaign on behalf of the

seven on the Continent has been the

Zurich-based Christian Solidarity International. President Hans Stuckelberger's

organization has been involved for three

years in publicizing throughout Europe

the plight of the families. An active effort

has been made to recruit fellow Christians through materials in French, German, and Swedish. The Swedes have

been particularly responsive.

Marianne Ridge has been in charge of

the Christian Solidarity International program. She has devoted herselfto die task

with unusual perseverance and is largely

responsible for the fact that the Vashchenkos and Chmykhalc.vs receive letters

today via international mail. American

officials have insisted throughout that

they cannot deliver mail addressed to the

Russian families dial arrives at die embassy via diplomatic pouch. They contend this is a violation ofmail agreements

with die Soviets, and only correspondence that comes through the international route (that is, through the hands of

the Soviets) can be given to die refugees.

This meant, of course, that virtually all of

the mail from Western Christians was

confiscated during the early months of

their stay in the embassy. Ridge established a system whereby Christians in the

West sent copies to Christian Solidarity

International of die letters they mailed to

the embassy. She kept track ofhow many

of die originals arrived at die embassy

and publicized die figures in the West,

showing how few letters were getting

through. The Soviets are now allowing

much ofthe mail to reach the embassy•

a change that is due in large part to die

efforts of Christian Solidarity International

Initial support for the Siberian Seven in

England centered on die efforts ofJohn

Pollock, author of The Siberian Seven,

and of Keston College. Hodder and

Stoughton published the book in 1979,

several months before die American edition was available. The English edition is

now completely sold out Keston College

in Kent is operated by die Society for die

Study of Religion Under Communism. It

is under the direction of Michael Bourdeaux and publishes die journal Religion

in Communist Lands. Bourdeaux and

Keston College are recognized throughout the world for their scholarly and careful study ofreligion behind die Iron Curtain. From the first, they have done what

they could to publicize the plight of the

Siberian Seven.

It was not until last spring, however,

CHRISTIANITY TOTMY
145

that a major British

campaign was

launched on behalf

of the Russian Christians stranded in the

U.S. Moscow embassy. The impetus

for it emerged from

an interview Dan

Wooding conducted

with me in Seattle. Kent HIM

Upon Wooding's return to Britain) and

with the support of the Seattle-based

"Friends in the West" (headed by Ray

Bamett), the "Campaign to Free the Siberian Seven" was launched in Great Britain.

In contrast to the United States, the response of the Christian community in

Britain was enthusiastic. A key factor in

generating this response was the active

involvement of Christian leaders and

organizations. Peter Meadows, publishing editor of Buzz Magazine (Britain's largest-selling interdenominational

Christian monthly), took the lead in forming a British committee that included

Bourdeaux, Pollock, and David Atkinson

(member of Parliament). Danny Smith,

former communications executive in

Europe for World Vision, was recruited

to head the campaign to aid the Moscow

refugees. On April 7, the Manchester

Guardian carried a story announcing to

(he British public the creation ofthe committee.

The British committee focused its initial efforts on achieving two objectives:

mobilizing the Christian community in

Britain to speak out on behalfofthe Siberian Seven, and organizing a demonstration in London's Trafalgar Square, which

was set for June 27•the three-year

anniversary of the Russian Christians'

arrival at the American embassy. They

succeeded in both areas. Special "action

packs" were prepared for distribution to

churches and concerned individuals

throughout Britain. Included in the materials were a tape/slide presentation,

leaflets on what the situation was and

what Christians could do to help, buttons, and so on. Over 700 such action

packs have been dispersed thus far.

The Trafalgar Square demonstration

not only occurred, but it attracted the

attention of the British press. It was preceded on June 25 by a press conference

organized by the "Campaign to Free the

Siberian Seven" committee. All the major

news media were present. A call was

placed at the conference to the American

embassy in order to speak with the Siberian Seven. Britain's foremost authority

on religion behind the Iron Curtain acted

as interpreter for the conversation. The

BBC devoted a full eight minutes to coverage ofthe press conference.

Two days later the demonstration took

place. More than 3,000 Christians participated, and national press coverage was

excellent. Between 3:30 and 5 P.M., the

demonstrators were addressed by several

members of Parliament and listened to

tapes sent to Britain from the Siberi n

Seven. They also heard a firsthand report

on the condition of the refugees from

Danny Smith, Ay hadjust returned from

idition of

a visit to Moscow. The demonstrators

then marched to the Soviet embassy in

London, arriving there by 7 P.M. About

500 of the demonstrators squeezed into a

church near the embassy to begin an allnight, 12-hour prayer vigil for the Siberian Seven.

Throughout the night, 12 demonstrators stood across from the Soviet embassy

holding pictures of the Russian refugees.

Every 45 minutes they were replaced by

12 new protesters from the church where

the all-night prayer vigil was being held.

Ray Bamett and Danny Smith attempted

to present to Soviet officials a 22-foot-long

petition requesting emigration permission for the seven. The Soviets refused to

accept the petition, which contained the

signatures of several thousand British

Christians. The whole episode was covered by national television, making its

way into millions of households throughout the British Isles, and thereby greatly

increasing public awareness ofthe plight

ofthe Siberian Seven.

Another important aspect ofthe British

committee's work has been to involve

Parliament in the case. A week before the

June demonstration, David Alton (Liberal

M.P.) raised the issue in die House of

Commons in the form of an "early day

motion. * Ifsuch a motion receives the endorsement of at least 100 members of

Parliament, it is submitted to a government secretary and receives an official response. The British committee contacted

by mail each member of Parliament as

well as the House ofLords, and well over

100 have already pledged their support.

Hdpthi

ijwimmj"

What American Christians Can Do to Help the SeJ^ri

Join the "Free the Siberian Seven"

campaign. Modeled after the very successful and ongoing British campaign

(sponsored by Buzz Magazine} on behalf

of the Russian refugees, this is the most

ambitious American project thus far

undertaken. Friends in the West is coordinating this nationwide endeavor to

publicize the plight ofthe Siberian Seven

to American Christians and to give practical suggestions on what they can do to

help. The campaign is not intended to

supplant projects of other organizations

now under way, but to provide a means

to inform and mobilize the Christian

community as a whole•something that

so far has not been achieved.

Special "Action Packs" have been

prepared that include a tape/slide presentation. The 50 slides and taped commentary will enable congregations and

Christian organizations to become familiar with the Siberian Seven. Also included

in the packet is a magazine providing detailed information on the refugees and

what Christians can do to aid them.

Bracelets carrying the names of individual members ofthe Siberian Seven are

available as prayer reminders.

The "Action Packs" are available by

writing Friends in the West, P.O. Box

66515, 14925 22nd Avenue S.W., Seattle,

Washington 98166, or by calling toll free

in continental U.S. the "Action Line"

number: (800) 331-1750, operator 602

(in Oklahoma. [800] 722-3600, operator

602).

Further information about the "Free

the Siberian Seven" campaign can be obtained by calling the "Action Line" number, and orders can be placed for specific

materials (written information, bracelets,

etc.), if the entire "Action Pack" is not

needed. Because the "Action Packs" are

expensive to produce, a $25 donation is

requested, though not required.

Support the Society of Americans

for Vashchenko/Chmykhalov Emigration (SA.V.E.). This group has worked

hard to keep Christians informed on recent developments in the case and on

what they can do to help. Though hampered by a relatively small mailing list

and limited resources, SAVE, deserves

support. Contributions are solicited, and

they will be glad to put you on their mailing list for updating of information and

action suggestions: SAV.L, Jane Drake,

Secretary, Route 1, Box 49-A, Pike Road,

Alabama 36064.

Write the Siberian Seven. In a'J of

the enthusiasm to write governmental officials and publicize the case, supporters

frequently forget that the Siberian Seven

are in desperate need of encouragement.

Augustina Vashchenko, for example,

must sit in the embassy day after day and

wonder how her small children at home

are faring. Parents and relatives get sick

and die, the children suffer without their

parents, and the family members in the

embassy feel helpless.

Letters oflove and support from Christians in the West are a great boost to

morale. Answering the letters is a healthy

use of their time and confirms for them

that thev are not forgotten in Moscow.

Reading The Siberian Seven by John Pollock is helpful for concerned Christians in

the West who, in writing to them, want to

know something about their lives. But in

any case, the seven are pleased simply to

hear from American friends concerned

about their welfare.

It is suggested that letters be addressed

to individual members of the Siberian

Seven, rather than to the whole group.

CHRISTIANITY TODAY
146

-5-

Square to dieSoviet embu« In London.

The issue has proven to be nonpartiflan,

attracting the support of Conservative,

Liberal, and Labour members of Parliament. The list of those supporting the

"Campaign to Free the Siberian Seven" is

quite impressive: Winston Churchill

(M.P. and grandson of the late prime

minister), Clement Freud (M.P. and

grandson of Sigmund Freud), Sir Hugh

Frazier (House of Lords), Lord Chalfbnt

(House of Lords), David Steel (leader of

the Liberal party), and David Owen (former foreign secretary and leader of the

new Social Democratic parry). The Christian rock star Cliff Richard also has publicly endorsed the cause.

The British committee is now occupied

in its biggest project to date: the attempt

to arrange a joint invitation from 300

British churches to the Siberian Seven

and their families to emigrate to England.

The archbishop of Canterbury recently

committed himself to appeal publicly on

behalfofthe "Siberian Seven."

What are the prospects for a successful

resolution of this protracted struggle by

the Siberian Seven to emigrate to the

West? In a word, uncertain. Supporters of

the Vashchenkos and ChmvkhaIovs in the

West are well aware that it is not within

the powers of the U.S. government to

grant the families the right to emigrate.

Ultimately that decision must remain

with the Soviets. It is. however, within

our powers to provide the famines with

our full support while they are in the

embassy and to make their difficult stay

as pleasant as possible. This becomes

parocuLirly crucial in light ofthe very severe psychological pressures to which the

families in the embassy are subject while

their case drags on with no end in sight

In the past, the Soviets have shown

themselves vulnerable to public pressure

from the West. Consider, for example, the

successes in Jewish emigration brought

about by a committedJewish and human

rights lobby. There are far more Christians in this country than Jews, but they

are silent and disunited. If they raised

their voices in protest, they would not

only guarantee l'.S. government support

of the case, but might well have an influence on the Soviets who seek to avoid

negative publicity whenever possible.

It would be well to remember the

words ofEdmund Burke: "The only thing

necessary for the triumph of evil is for

good men to do nothing." The ultimate

fate of the Siberian Seven may well test

our awareness ofthat truth. Q

The names and birthdays ofthe seven are

as follows:

Peter Vaschenko: October 30, 1927;

Augustina Vashchenko: March 28, 1929;

Lida Vaschenko: March 6, 1951; Lyuba

Vaschenko: December 17,1952; Lila Vaschenko: July 16, 1957; Maria Oimykhalov:June 19,1922; Timothy Chmykhalov:

April 30,1962.

The American embassy in Moscow requires that letters to the Siberian Seven be

sent via international mail using the following address:

Peter Vaschenko (for example)

Embassy ofthe U.S.A.

Ulitsa Diaikovskogo 19/21

Moscow, USSR 117234.

To prevent unnecessary delays, it is

best to send letters airmail. Although the

mail must pass through the hands of the

Soviets, delivery has been quite good in

recent months if it carried clear indication at the top of letters that a copy was

being sent to an agency that monitors delivery of the original letters to the embassy. The best place for Americans to

send copies of their letters is to: Religion

in Communist Dominated Areas (RCDA),

475 Riverside Drive, New York, New

York 10027. The Hrubys of RCDA also

operate with very limited financial reSEPTEMBER IB, l»i

sources and are worthy of financial support

Write letters to government officials. It is absolutely essential that

American authorities are convinced mat

the Christian community in this country

fully support efforts by the U.S. government to do whatever it can to convince

the Soviets to grant the Vashchenkos and

Chmykhalovs the right to emigrate to die

West. Christians should commend the

American embassy for its fine support of

the Siberian Seven since early in 1981 and

urge mat this positive treatment of the

case be continued as long as necessary.

It is particularly important mat Christians write their senators and ask mem

whether theyjftrs supporting S. 312, the

hill mat vv(j•l|r/rViLthe Vashchenkos

and ChinvkhaloH^yJFrWjnent resident

status" in the Uniten Attss. Christians

should express their own%up)tart of the

bill as one important way in wra^the

American government can indicate to

Soviets its commitment to a successful

resolution ofthis thorny dilemma.

In addition to letters from individuals,

churches, missionary groups, youth

clubs, civic organizations, Bible studies,

nursing homes, and so on can also send

petitions to government officials expressing their concern and support Important

addresses are*.

President Reagan

The White House

Washington, D.C 20500

YourSenator

U.S. Senate

Washington, D.C 20510

Your Representative

U.S. House ofRepresentatives

Washington, D.C 20510

Hon. Alexander M. Haig,Jr.

Department ofState

Washington, D.C 20520

Hon. Arthur Hartman

Embassy ofthe U.S.A. in Moscow

A.P.O., New York, N.Y. 09662

Ambassador Anatoty Dobrynin

Embassy ofthe USSR

1125 16th Street N.W.

Washington, D.C 20036

Fray. Christians should pray for the

successful resolution of this tragic stalemate, for the morale and spiritual health

of the Siberian Seven, and for the inspiration and discipline to do everything

within their power to effect a positive resolution ofthe issue. (~l

(12101 37
147

Senator SIMPSON. Thank you very much, sir. We appreciate

having that testimony.

You at this table have probably spent more time and more effort

than any of our fellow citizens in this country on this issue. You

have heard, and have heard continually, the commentary of the

State Department and the Justice Department indicating their concern about the precedent, and you have each addressed that.

In my capacity as chairman of this subcommittee in dealing with

issues of asylum and refugees, and consultation processes, and 16

million people ranging the Earth who have already pulled their

feet away from their homelands, seeking a place to go. I have a

strong sense of the fact that many around the world look to the

United States as a place of refuge.

Do you have any concern that a precedent could come which

could result in citizens from repressive regimes seeking asylum in

our Embassies with the hope of being granted some kind•let's not

say what, whether it is permanent residency, or adjusted status or

special status by the United States. Do you foresee that at all in

your honest review of it?

Dr. HILL. Mr. Chairman, if I could respond.

Senator SIMPSON. Please.

Dr. HILL. I would suggest that there is one common item of business that we have before us in terms of a precedent issue, and I

think the proponents of this bill are in complete agreement, and

that is the commitment of all of us to making our Embassies safe

for the conducting of diplomatic business. It is therefore our position that our Embassies must always be places where people can

come to discuss, but once the discussions are over, they must leave

whether they want to or not. That sounds harsh, but it is a reality

we must face.

If this was a case like that, I would say, expel them. But because

of the extraordinary nature of this particular case, and the factors

that we have brought forth, I think if we would simply publicize all

of the facts about this case, that they came to visit and not to seek

asylum, that the reason they" stayed was because of the violence, et

cetera, the fact that they had had almost two decades of contact

with American officials, we have grounds to make an exception in

a case like this.

I think there is room to, if necessary, clarify the language of the

bill to make that position perfectly clear. But I do not think that

this case need set that precedent, if we simply talk about the extraordinary nature of it.

Senator SIMPSON. YOU feel deeply, I perceive, that the bill or

something similar to it is the only method now of proper relief.

Dr. HILL. It is the most vigorous method that is now on the table.

It actually accomplishes two things. It guarantees their status

within the American Embassy. The second part of it is equally important, I think, and that is, it sends a clear signal to the Soviets

that we take this case very seriously. I think both of those objectives would be achieved, and both would help to enhance to the

possibility of resolving the issue.

Senator SIMPSON. MS. Drake, you describe the measure before us

as the strongest statement yet made to the Soviet government concerning mistreatment of human beings. Do you have any reserva-
148

tion at all, because I know the depth of your feelings as I visited

with you personally, that in any way that this might actually

reduce the likelihood of the Soviets allowing these people to emigrate from Russia?

Ms. DRAKE. Absolutely not. The Vashchenkos and the Chmykhalovs are dead if they walk outside that Embassy. This is the only

hope that they have.

Senator SIMPSON. I do not know, sir, but have you visited these

persons? Dr. Hill and Ms. Drake have visited them in the Embassy.

Mr. HRUBY. I did not, Mr. Chairman. If I may make a brief comment on that question, what will happen then if the bill is passed?

I heard high American diplomats explaining to a group, "if this

bill is passed, then the whole of Siberia will come to the U.S. Embassy in Moscow." So what, it would not be an American problem,

but it would be a Soviet problem because the whole world would

see how many thousands of people want to leave the Soviet paradise. After all, the American Embassy is guarded by the KGB, as

you know well from the testimony and the documents that it is

almost impossible to enter the Embassy.

Senator SIMPSON. Certainly one of the things in our consultation

process that has been presented with regard to refugees is that the

Government now has set a limit on those emigrating from the

Soviet Union, a rather significant figure, a figure that should give

hope to those there who wish to emigrate.

The graver part of the situation is that there will probably be

many less who will actually come than the figure that has been established after the consultations by the administration. But at least

it shows that our arms are open for that. Of course, the repression

is clear in actually seeing how few of those people come.

The figures as to how many Pentecostals and other Christians

wishing to emigrate from the Soviet Union, what is your estimate

on that, Mr. Hruby, with your background?

Mr. HRUBY. Mr. Chairman, we believe there are at least 50,000

Christians of various denominations, mostly unregistered, but there

are also members of the registered churches. I think that the

figure of about 50,000 is quite accurate.

Senator SIMPSON. Senator Grassley of the subcommittee is present. I did not get the opportunity to introduce him to you. He has a

very active interest in the affairs of the Immigration and Refugee

Subcommittee. He is a newly elected colleague from Iowa, and a

very interested participant in these activities.

Senator Grassley.

HON. CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE

OF IOWA

Senator GRASSLEY. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Mr. Chairman, first of all, I want to commend you for holding a

hearing like this. I don't know whether the legislation in this hearing is precedent setting or precedent breaking or not, but it appears that way to me, at least in the years that I have been in the

Congress. So you are to be commended as an individual for showing

the concern, and hopefully with the end result of helping the

people that are listed in the bill.
149

I also want to say to you that the reason I was late was because

we had a meeting with the Secretary of the Interior in my office

from 10:00 until 10:45.

I also want to apologize for not being here when my senior colleague from Iowa was here, because for several years he has had a

concern in this area, and has had a leadership role not only in the

Congress, but in activity outside the Congress in trying to bring to

the public's attention the problems of dissidents around the

world•not just in Russia, but around the world as well.

My first question is to Mr. Hruby, or anybody else who would

like to answer.

Have the families ever been urged to leave the Embassy, and if

so, by whom?

Mr. HRUBY. Senator, may I ask my wife to answer because she

did so much in this case.

Mrs. HRUBY. Over the 3V2 years, several attempts were made to

evict the families. This information we received directly from

them, because we are communicating with them, and they appointed us to represent their interests in this country.

One of those efforts took place on August 27, 1978. From June 27

until August 27, they were staying in the waiting room of the Embassy, without facilities. They had to wash up in the lavatories.

They were sitting on the sofas and sleeping on the floor. They were

fed with food that was brought to them by volunteers on the staff

of the Embassy. They hardly had any change of clothing.

On August 27, they were given an ultimatum, and tender persuasion was applied to them to leave the Embassy. By that time they

had communication from Chernogorsk, from their family, from

their son John who underwent third-degree torture in the hands of

the KGB following his aborted attempt to enter the Embassy with

his parents and sisters.

Their family in Chernogorsk begged them not to return because

that would mean the death or torture for the entire family, including the minor children. The Vashchenkos, by the way, have 13 children, the youngest being about 7 years old.

The Vashchenkos and Chmykhalovs thought that they would be

evicted. However, Peter Vashchenko is a very stubborn person, obviously, otherwise he would not have been able to withstand all

these pressures or persecutions for so many years. He said to the

Embassy officials that they were welcome to take him out, carry

him out across the threshold, but he would not walk out into the

hands of the KGB.

That night numerous cars of the KGB were waiting in front of

the Embassy to transport the seven wherever the KGB wanted

them transported. So that night the decision was made, presumably by Ambassador Toon, that they could stay.

They were given a room in the Embassy basement that was used

for overnight guests, or Marines, and it was called in Embassy vernacular "the Dungeon." Since that day in August 1978, the seven

people are living in that crowded little room with two single beds.

Other attempts were made by the Embassy staffers, directly and

indirectly, to remove these people, or to persuade them to return to

Chernogorsk. The seven refused to accept the assurances of the

Embassy that they should take the chances that perhaps nothing

would happen to them.
150

We have an unsigned letter drafted, obviously by the Embassy,

in Russian and in English. The letter is undated, but it is obviously

a very recent effort on the part of the Embassy to persuade the

seven to return to Chernogorsk. I studied both texts.

First there is the Russian version, written in Pidgin Russian

which no Russian person would be able to compose, so obviously

the seven had nothing to do with formulating this letter. It was

written by some American who had perhaps 2 years of high school

Russian.

Then follows the English version, which obligates the seven to

return to Chernogorsk, providing that the Embassy will seek some

assurance from the Soviet authorities that the seven would not be

persecuted.

I will be very happy to include this with the statement if you

wish to study it.

Senator GRASSLEY. I would be happy to have that included in the

record.

Senator SIMPSON. Without objection.

[Document follows:]
151

vS> EMBASSY OF THE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Mu npocHn nocna CLUA oOpaTMTbCH a no/ibsy Hac CoaeTCHony

ilMHMCTBpCTBy HHOCTpaHblX p,BJ\ 3S 6B30naCHHM eueafl M3* COBBTCHoro Co«3a. Nu noHMnaen, HTO nocon nonpocMT paspeuieHHe

Ha BUB3A Ha nocTOHHoe WMTe/ibCTBo Hauiefi cenew H3 HepHoropcna,

H TaHwe nonbiTaGTCR flocratb cor^auiSHHe CoBSTCHoro npaBme/ibCT ea

HB npeBJieHatb *ac H yro/iOBHOH OTBBTCTBBHHOCTH sa MHTenbCTBO

B AnepHHaHCKort nocojibcise H 6/iarocH^OHHo paccnaTpHBaTb Haujy

npocbSy anHrpHposaTb H3 CoBSTCHoro Coioaa. Mu paapewaeri nocny

cooOuiHTb, HTO ripn TaHNx ycnoBunx nu BepHBncn B HepHoropcH

WToBbl oOpaTHTbCfl 3a paSpBUIBHHB Ha BblB3A, H Mbl oCeiuaen Bblno/iHHTb BCG nyHHTb TaHoro cor/iaiueHwe.

*

We request the Ambassador of the United States to make a

"representation on our behalf to the ^Soviet Ministry of Foreign•

Affairs to seek our safe departure from the United StatesEmbassy and emigration from the Soviet Union. We understand

that the Ambassador will seek to secure the emigration of

our families from Chemogorsk, and will seek a commitment

from the Soviet government not to prosecute us for our residence in the Embassy and to look favorably upon our application

for emigration from the USSR. We authorize the Ambassador to

state that under these conditions we will return to Chemogorsk

to apply for exit permission, and we promise to fulfill the

terms of such an agreement.
152

Senator GRASSLEY. Mr. Chairman, I think what this is saying,

and if that has already been brought out, I hate to be repetitious,

that it was a policy of our Government at some level that these

people should be encouraged, or a letter like that indicates to me,

almost forced out of the Embassy.

I would like to have the chairman respond, if he knows.

Senator SIMPSON. Those are some of the things that are the most

vexatious aspects of it. There are all sorts of allegations as to the

official line of the United States. Whether they want them out,

there is a sense that they do. There is a sense, obviously, that they

want to protect them. There is a sense that the international community is watching, and when we get down to those issues we may

have to go to a closed or executive session to really determine that.

I cannot say what that is.

Senator GRASSLEY. I presume that the inference of your comments to me were that it was the official policy of our Government

that they should leave.

Mrs. HRUBY. Senator, I am not sure that it is the official policy of

our Government, but it is the policy of the Embassy.

Senator GRASSLEY. What restrictions have been placed on the

families since arrival at the Embassy, and I would like to especially

ask about access to mail, visitors, and the press.

Has there been any noticeable change in policies since there has

been a change of administration between Carter and Reagan?

Mrs. HRUBY. Yes.

Senator GRASSLEY. YOU are answering the last question?

Mrs. HRUBY. Yes.

Senator GRASSLEY. There has been a change?

Mrs. HRUBY. There has been a change. There has been some improvement.

Senator GRASSLEY. Some improvement?

Mrs. HRUBY. Yes; visitors have access to them. In the beginning,

their visitors were extremely restricted. They had to be approved a

priori. Only several members of the Embassy staff had access to

these people. Now the volunteer visitors are unrestricted. Even outsiders who come in, American visitors, have access to the families

without supervision from the Embassy.

Furthermore, there are mail privileges available to these people

now, which was not the case in the beginning. At the beginning

they were not permitted to have a radio, until we stirred some

trouble.

Also, they were not permitted to attend religious services until

they wrote a petition to the Pope, which we delivered to the Vatican by courtesy of the Papal legate in Washington and Cardinal

Kroi. It was accepted by the Vatican, after which they were able to

attend the Catholic services because the Catholic services are held

in the compound, in the snack bar, whereas the Protestant church

services are held in the Ambassador's residence outside of the compound.

Senator GRASSLEY. When you say, they are permitted, you

mean

Mrs. HRUBY. The seven.
153

Senator GRASSLEY. Yes, the seven. But the change in policy, in

other words, American officials are now permitting them to have a

radio, as an example.

Mrs. HRUBY. Yes.

Senator GRASSLEY. Why would American Embassy people not

want them to attend worship services or have a radio; what was

behind our Government's policy?

Mrs. HRUBY. The purpose was to isolate them from contact with

the outside, and it would be psychological pressure on them to

leave, because seven people in one room would go insane.

Senator GRASSLEY. It appears to be obvious now, except that I

just did not think that of American officials wanting to bring that

sort of intimidation upon people.

Mrs. HRUBY. Unfortunately, that was the case. There were, personal slurs on the part of some American officials.

Senator GRASSLEY What are the accommodations for the seven

people like living space, support and comfort?

Mrs. HRUBY. Ms. Drake was in the Embassy just recently, so perhaps she could give a better description of that.

Ms. DRAKE. I have two complaints. They are sleeping on the

floor, and they have a foam mattress that must be the filthiest

foam mattress I have ever seen in my life, and some Army blankets that must have been left over from World War II.

Lyuba cannot sleep in the small room because there is not

enough room to lay down on the floor, so she has to go out into the

hallway. There was already a draft in October, so by January in

Moscow it is going to be awfully cold on that cold concrete floor.

Lyuba told me that she had asked the Embassy for cots,"and they

had told her no, it was impossible to get cots.

She also told me that they had asked for paint. I asked the Embassy officials, but of course they had recently arrived there and

knew nothing of that. Because I requested it, they did give the

paint shortly after I left.

The other thing that I asked for was for Valentina the barber to

please be put in another place, and I was very frankly and very

strongly told that Valentina needed ventilation, electricity, and

water, and there was no other place.

The Embassy women and men liked the way that Valentina

fixed their hair, so Valentina will stay there by Vashchenkos and

Chmykhalovs. So that Valentina cannot hear everything that they

are saying, when they are discussing something important, they

turn the radio on and whisper.

Dr. HILL. Mr. Chairman, may I add to that as well?

Senator GRASSLEY. Yes.

Dr. HILL. I don't want to in any way minimize what was said, but

I think to be fair with the State Department and the Embassy employees, I should note that the living conditions of the families at

the Embassy are in some ways probably better than they were for

them back home in Siberia. These people are very poor. They come

from a very bad background.

Our major complaint is not with their facilities at the Embassy,

although they could be improved a lot. The point is that there has

been so much fluctuation in State Department policy during the

last 3V2 years.
154

The first 2*/2 years can be described as, basically, varying forms

of harassment of one sort or another. Then in January and February of this year, it appeared that the policy was loosening up, becoming more positive toward the folks.

Then I just heard the news just recently that in fact the Embassy position has not, in fact, changed with respect to the question of

whether the Embassy is going to urge to return to Chernogorsk.

So I think the whole purpose of the bill is to minimize such fluctuations in the future by granting some sort of legal status which

would exclude the possibility that a change in policy could result in

negative treatment of them, or possibly expulsion.

Senator GRASSLEY. Any of you could answer this, but what are

the implications of this bill, either its introduction and/or passage,

have on religious believers in the Soviet Union?

Because of our Government's interest in this, is there any more

persecution against believers?

Mrs. HRUBY. Yes, Senator. Two years ago, coinciding with the

Pope's visit to Poland, a new antireligious campaign was unleashed, and I mean unleashed. There are numbers of Pentecostal,

Adventist, Catholic, Orthodox, Methodist ministers and laymen arrested, harassed, tortured, some were killed, many were sentenced.

We mentioned the case of Reverend Shelkov who spent 25 years

of his 83 years in concentration camps, and at the age of 83 he was

sentenced to 5 years at hard labor. He survived for 9 months in Siberia, and in January of last year he died there at the age of 84.

There is the case of Reverend Goretoi, a Pentecostal minister,

who was sentenced to 7 years in prison, and 5 years of internal

exile for purely religious activity. The man is blind.

Senator GRASSLEY. Could I interrupt you, please.

Mrs. HRUBY. Yes.

Senator GRASSLEY. I appreciate these examples, but my question

was more to the point. Since this bill was introduced, or if you

think that it passes, that there has been or that there will be any

more denial of religious freedom, or any more torture and imprisonment as a result of this bill?

Mrs. HRUBY. NO, there cannot be.

Senator GRASSLEY. In other words, you are saying that the situation is already so bad.

Mrs. HRUBY. But it will improve because the Soviet Government

will have to recognize

Senator GRASSLEY. YOU are saying that if the bill passes, then

the environment will improve; that is your view?

Mrs. HRUBY. Yes.

Senator GRASSLEY. Mr. Chairman, I want to put in the record my

statement that I was not able to give, but I would like to make the

last point that I was going to make orally.

Senator SIMPSON. Without objection.

[Opening statement of Senator Grassley follows:]

OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR CHARLES E. GRASSLEY

Thank you Mr. Chairman.

As we are all well aware people who attempt to practice their faith in the Soviet

Union face dire consequences. I believe the situation of the families existing in the
155

basement of the American Embassy in Moscow is representative of families all

across Russia who want to live a religious life.

I use the word "existing" because that is exactly what these people are doing•

simply existing. They are not living; their lives are essentially at a standstill. Their

quarters consist of a 12 x 20 foot room where seven people eat and sleep.

Though I realize that the embassy staff has attempted to make the families comfortable I believe more must be done and I understand that at least with the changing in administration conditions have somewhat improved.

I understand that there are criticisms of this bill•that passing of the bill will encourage others to "storm" the embassy, that the Soviets will look disfavorably on

the bill as an attempt by the American government to interfere in Soviet domestic

affairs, and that how can we grant everyone who attempts to emigrate from the

Soviet Union permanent residence status in the United States.

These contentions may be valid however I believe that they are outweighed by the

following considerations:

The families did not set out to "storm" the embassy. The situation they encountered outside of the building forced them to act as they did. Others have attempted

to gain entry into the embassy but have been unsuccessful.

The Soviet government has always looked upon even the mention of human rights

or religious freedom by the American government as interference in their internal

affairs. Over the years they have come to expect pressure from America in this area

and in fact without that pressure 250,000 Jews would never have been allowed to

leave the Soviet Union during the past ten years.

This is an extraordinary problem calling for extraordinary relief. Three years

have gone by and the families remain. The new American Embassy is now under

construction in Moscow. What will happen to these people once the new building is

completed.

We are constantly concerned about what kind of signal we send to the Soviets

through our action on the world scene. I believe this is the correct signal. Emmigration from the U.S.S.R. is at its lowest level in ten years. Arrests among religious

activists are on the upswing, their children have been taken from them, they have

been subjected to harrasment, searches, labor camps, prison and psychiatric hospitals.

Its imperative that we as Americans do not neglect these people. I urge the President that the issue of human rights and emmigration be on the table during all discussions with the Soviets whether these discussions involve trade or arms reduction

and maybe then we won't have to worry about having people in the basement of our

embassy in the future.

Senator GRASSLEY. YOU know something this serious, especially

in light of the President's statement on European arms limitation,

and we are going to go into initial talks on continuation of SALT

negotiations, now called START.

It seems to me that we have been effective in the past in some

negotiations with linkage, and I would think that human rights instances like this, or specific examples like this ought to be laid on

the table by the President, especially in economic negotiations, so

that the Jackson-Vanick legislation is not just kind of a hollow

treaty.

I think we ought to urge the administration to try to put more

on the table than just economic matters, and military matters,

arms matters, but also we ought to include some of these things

that America really stands for. If the economic situation is as bad

in Russia as we have been led to believe it is, and they need some

of the things we have, and they need to spend less on military than

what they are, we might just be able to get some relief for people

who have been discriminated against in Russia.

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

Senator SIMPSON. Thank you very much, Senator Grassley.

We have a rollcall vote in just a very few minutes, so we will

come to the conclusion of the hearing. I very much appreciate your
156

testimony. Please recall that this is the first hearing we have held

on this bill ever, so we will proceed with it.

My intention is to have an executive hearing or a closed hearing

with State and Justice Department officials in order to review present immediate diplomatic approaches, and exit visa procedures, because I think from the testimony and from the expressions of this

administration that there is indeed a more significant push to do

something under the present administration.

I am going to personally visit with those in the executive branch,

and the President who has spoken rather loud and strong and clear

on this issue, and see where we are from the Executive level, above

and beyond the State and Justice levels.

So making no flowing promises, the easiest thing to do in this

business is to grab the microphone and get everybody all juiced up,

and I will not do that to you, as you have had your hopes dashed

before. But I think we can proceed and see if we can get closer to

our goal than you might have thought a year ago, or 2 years ago.

I commend you, and on behalf of the fellow citizens, for your zeal

in this cause, and your attention to it. Thank you so much for

coming here to testify. We appreciate it.

With that, the hearing is concluded.

[Whereupon, at 12:05 p.m., the subcommittee adjourned to reconvene at the call of the Chair.]
157

APPENDIX

PREPARED STATEMENT OF DR. ERNEST GORDON, PRESIDENT, CREED

(CHRISTIAN RESCUE EFFORT FOR THE EMANCIPATION OF

DISSIDENTS)

Mr. Chairman:

For the past three and a half years, the basement of the U. S.

Embassy in Moscow has been the front line in the war between a

free society and a collective one. In the case of the Siberian

Seven, we have been seeing played out the conflict between a society

that respects the individual's freedom of conscience, and a society

which denies that basic freedom.

The Chmykhalov and the Vashchenko families, known as the Siberian

Seven, have suffered harassment, persecution, and imprisonment because

of their public witness to faith in Jesus Christ as Lord. Tired of

continuous persecution in their own country, they decided to emigrate

to a country where they could practice their faith freely. When

Christians in this country learned about their hardships, they

invited them to come to America. Reverend Cecil J. Williamson, Jr.,

of Selma, Alabama, issued the first invitation to the Vashchenkos,

while Mrs. Gordon Lindsay of Dallas invited the Chmykhalovs.

However, their applications for permission to emigrate were denied.

This clearly violates Articles 13 and 14 of the Declaration of

Human Rights. In the hope that the intervention of the U. S. Embassy

would enable the Vashchenkos to acquire the necessary exit visas, they

decided to go to Moscow to present their case at our Embassy. The

Chmykhalovs decided to join them although they had not received

an invitation at that time. When the two families approached our
158

Embassy on June 27, 1978, a number of Soviet policemen denied

them access. Despite the barriers formed against them the two

families ran past the guards to the Embassy door where they

were met and taken to the consular waiting room.

John, the teenaged son of the Vashchenkos, was caught by the police,

beaten physically, later tortured, and then returned to Chernogorsk

from which he and his family had just come. Such treatment of a

minor is reprehensible.

I wish I could say that these families were treated with courtesy

so characteristic of our people, but I cannot. The treatment

afforded them was lacking in civility. Their lot would have been

extremely hard had it not been for the help of fellow believers

within the Embassy. These people cooked meals for the seven

Russian citizens and brought them to their quarters.

It is to be noted tha . the Vashchenkos offered to leave the Embassy

as soon as their son was brought to them. After two months the

families were moved to a small room in the basement with two

beds, a bathroom, and cooking facilities.

Although their living quarters have been improved, the families

have suffered the effects of confinement, lack of exercise and

work, and the continuous hardship of hope deferred. Like so many

others who are denied privileges offered by a free society, they

look to our country as the champion of personal freedom and the

guardian of the oppressed.

I am extremely grateful to Senator Carl Levin for his courageous

leadership in presenting this bill, S. 312, dealing with the

relief of the seven Pentecostals, to the attention of this

distinguished committee.
159

Throughout his years in office, he has been faithful in his commitment

to the cause of human dignity and freedom. In doing so he is a

true representative of his State, and of the tradition of this

country; one which seeks to submit the policies of government to

the scrutiny of God and His moral commands.

The Soviet Union has broken the laws of governments, the United

Nations, and God repeatedly. The situation of the Siberian Seven

is but one example of that. The reality of their situation is that

they sought refuge in our Embassy; that they have lived on the

equivalent of American soil for the past three-and-a-half years;

that they cannot exist there indefinitely; that their country and

its government has in fact scorned them for three-and-a-half

years; that the Soviet Union would persecute them were they to

leave our Embassy. Thus, it is the responsibility of our present

government to find ways of aiding them such as those indicated

in Senator Levin's bill.

o