alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 60-2.35 Compliance status.

No contractor's compliance status will be judged alone by whether it reaches its goals. The composition of the contractor's workforce (*i.e.*, the employment of minorities or women at a percentage rate below, or above, the goal level) does not, by itself, serve as a basis to impose any of the sanctions authorized by Executive Order 11246 and the regulations in this chapter. Each contractor's compliance with its affirmative action obligations will be determined by reviewing the nature and extent of the contractor's good faith affirmative action activities as required under § 60-2.17, and the appropriateness of those activities to identified equal employment opportunity problems. Each contractor's compliance with its nondiscrimination obligations will be determined by analysis of statistical data and other non-statistical information which would indicate whether employees and applicants are being treated without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.

[79 FR 72995, Dec. 9, 2014]
No. 10-11086.

#### Henry *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 10-11238.

#### Hearn *v.*Florida et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
---

---

# Exhibit 15.6

|                                 |                                
|-------------------------------- | -------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|                                 | Head Office: Amot Bituach House
|Building B                      
|46-48 Menachem Begin Road,      
|Tel-Aviv 66184                  
|Tel: +972 3 638 6868 Fax: +972 3
|639 4320                        
|E-mail: zivhaft@bdo.co.il       
|www.bdo.co.il                   

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statement (333-148460) on Form S-8 of
Lumenis Ltd., of our report dated June 25, 2008 with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Lumenis Ltd. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006
and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in
shareholders equity (capital deficiency) for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in the annual report on
Form 20-F of Lumenis Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

| |  | /s/ Ziv Haft
Ziv HaftCertified Public Accountants (Isr.)A BDO member firm
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tel Aviv, IsraelMay 8, 2009



---

---
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4364

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to transfer administrative jurisdiction over certain lands for inclusion in the Cape Hatteras National

Seashore Recreational Area.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1994

Mr. LANCASTER introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Merchant Marine and Fisheries and Natural Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to transfer administrative jurisdiction over certain lands for inclusion in

the Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF OCRACOKE LIGHT STATION TO

4 SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.

5 The Secretary of Transportation shall transfer ad6 ministrative jurisdiction over the Federal property, con7 sisting of approximately 2 acres, known as the Ocracoke

8 Light Station, to the Secretary of the Interior, subject to

9 such reservations, terms, and conditions as may be nec-
2

•HR 4364 IH

1 essary for Coast Guard purposes. All property so trans2 ferred shall be included in and administered as part of

3 the Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area.

Æ
#### § 302-5.1 What is a “househunting trip”?

The term “househunting trip” refers to a trip made by the employee and/or spouse to your new official station locality to find permanent living quarters to rent or purchase. The term “living quarters” in this part includes apartments, condominiums, and cooperatives in addition to townhouses and single family homes.
#### § 109-43.305 [Reserved]
#### § 301-11.9 When does per diem or actual expense entitlement start/stop?

Your per diem or actual expense entitlement starts on the day you depart your home, office, or other authorized point and ends on the day you return to your home, office or other authorized point.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SPACE DATA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ALPHABET INC., GOOGLE LLC, LOON LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

ERIC FRISCHE, CO-FOUNDER OF SPACE DATA, 

SERVED AS CHIEF TECHNICAL OFFICER AND 

DIRECTOR,

Defendant

______________________

2020-1036

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 5:16-cv-03260-BLF, 

Judge Beth Labson Freeman.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

ERIC LIEBELER, Stinson LLP, Washington, DC, argued

for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by KEVIN DONALD 

CONNEELY, Minneapolis, MN. 

 MATTHIAS A. KAMBER, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, 

Case: 20-1036 Document: 82 Page: 1 Filed: 10/19/2020
San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also 

represented by EUGENE MORRIS PAIGE, LEAH M. PRANSKY,

ROBERT A. VAN NEST, RYAN KUON MING WONG. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

October 19, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1036 Document: 82 Page: 2 Filed: 10/19/2020
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16384]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 
June 9, 2000

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: OST-2000-7498.
    Date Filed: June 9, 2000.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC31 SOUTH 0085 dated 6 June 2000; South Pacific 
Resolutions r1-r30; Minutes--PTC31 SOUTH 0086 dated 6 June 2000; 
Tables--PTC31 SOUTH Fares 0023 dated 6 June 2000; Intended effective 
date: 1 October 2000.

Andrea M. Jenkins,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-16384 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 14 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk December 14 , 2018

15 8 757 ( 1 9 )

ALCOA ENGINEERED STRUCTURES,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

SC: 158757

v COA: 343604

Oakland CC: 201 7

- 160310

- AA

MICHIGAN OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND

HEALTH ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent

- Appellee

.

_____________________________ _ ______ ____ __/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of respondent

- appellee to extend the time

for filing its answer is GRANTED

. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted

on or before January 9, 2019.
§ 302-6.24 How may my TQSE reimbursement be affected if I relocate to, or currently occupy, temporary quarters in a Presidentially-Declared Disaster area? Your agency should consider delaying all non-essential relocations to Presidentially-Declared Disaster areas because the ability to secure temporary quarters lodgings in those areas may be compromised. If relocation cannot be delayed, or if you are already occupying temporary quarters that have been affected by the disaster in a Presidentially-Declared Disaster area, for temporary quarters located within CONUS your agency may: ( a ) Authorize you to occupy temporary quarters outside of the proximity requirements at § 302-6.10; and
( b ) Authorize TQSE at the applicable locality per diem allowance under FTR §§ 301-11.100 through 301-11.102 of this subtitle or authorize actual expenses on an individual basis under FTR §§ 301-11.300 through 301-11.306 of this subtitle not to exceed 300 percent of the applicable per diem in accordance with § 301-11.303 of this subtitle; or
( c ) Issue a blanket actual expense authorization for official relocation travel performed on or after the date of the Presidentially-Declared Disaster.
( d ) The authorizations in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section must apply to a specific Presidential Disaster Declaration, and must end on the expiration date of the Declaration, or one year from the date the Declaration is issued, whichever is sooner. The maximum limit of 120 consecutive days that TQSE may be authorized is statutorily based and remains in effect in accordance with FTR § 302-6.29(a). A blanket authorization issued under this section shall not apply to any travel performed pursuant to chapter 301 of this subtitle and does not permit an agency to change the TQSE method authorized once the travel has begun. See § 302-6.22(b).
# Europeiska unionens C 34A/31 j

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 34A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 61 årgången31 januari 2018 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 34A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

61 årgången31 januari 2018

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rättelser |
| 2018/C 34 A/01 | Rättelse av meddelande om allmänna uttagningsprov – Epso/AD/354/17 – Lettiskspråkiga (LV) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/355/17 – Maltesiskspråkiga (MT) juristlingvister (AD 7) ( EUT C 418 A, 7.12.2017 ) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

Rättelser

2018/C 34 A/01

Rättelse av meddelande om allmänna uttagningsprov – Epso/AD/354/17 – Lettiskspråkiga (LV) juristlingvister (AD 7) – Epso/AD/355/17 – Maltesiskspråkiga (MT) juristlingvister (AD 7) ( EUT C 418 A, 7.12.2017 )

( EUT C 418 A, 7.12.2017 )

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

Rättelser

| 31.1.2018 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 34/1

---

Rättelse av meddelande om allmänna uttagningsprov

Epso/AD/354/17 – Lettiskspråkiga (LV) juristlingvister (AD 7)

Epso/AD/355/17 – Maltesiskspråkiga (MT) juristlingvister (AD 7)

(
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 418 A av den 7 december 2017
  )

(2018/C 034 A/01)

Sidan 1, under rubriken

I stället för:

”
  Sista ansökningsdag: den 16 januari 2018 kl. 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid)
  ”

ska det stå:

ska det stå:

”
  Sista ansökningsdag: den 30 januari 2018 kl. 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid)
  ”.

Sidan 5

Sidan 5

I stället för:

I stället för:

”NÄR OCH VAR KAN JAG ANSÖKA?

Gör en webbansökan via Epsos webbplats http://jobs.eu-careers.eu senast

den 16 januari 2018 kl. 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid)
  .”

ska det stå:

ska det stå:

”NÄR OCH VAR KAN JAG ANSÖKA?

Gör en webbansökan via Epsos webbplats http://jobs.eu-careers.eu senast

den 30 januari 2018 kl. 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid)
  .”

---
EXHIBIT 15.1

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts(1)



|                                  |  |                 |  |                   |  |                       |  |                
|--------------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ----------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ---------------
|Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |  | Opening Balance |  | Charged toExpense |  | Charged AgainstIncome |  | Closing Balance
|Deferred tax valuation allowance  |  |                |  |                  |  |                      |  |               
|December 31, 2008                 |  |                |  |                  |  |                      |  |               
|December 31, 2007                 |  |                |  |                  |  |                      |  |               
|December 31, 2006                 |  | 5,923           |  |                  |  | 5,923                 |  |               



|(1) | In thousands of U.S.$.
|--- | ----------------------
#### § 0.151 Functions of the Office.

The Office of Administrative Law Judges consists of as many Administrative Law Judges qualified and appointed pursuant to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 3105 as the Commission may find necessary. It is responsible for hearing and conducting adjudicatory cases designated for hearing other than those designated to be heard by the Commission en banc, or by one or more commissioners. The Office of Administrative Law Judges is also responsible for conducting such other hearing proceedings as the Commission may assign.

[85 FR 63171, Oct. 6, 2020]
<PAGE>   1

                         GLOBE BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC.
                            EXHIBIT 99 - SAFE HARBOR

         The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe
harbor from civil litigation in many instances for forward-looking statements.
In order to take advantage of the Act, such statements must be accompanied by
meaningful cautionary statements that identify important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those that might be projected.
This exhibit to the Registrant's Form 10-K is being filed in order to allow the
Registrant to take advantage of the new provisions of this Act by providing the
following cautionary statements:

Risk Factors Affecting Globe
----------------------------

         Globe's business operations and strategy are subject to a number of
uncertainties and risks which could adversely affect its performance in the
future. Among these are the following factors:

         Globe's principal growth strategy depends on the acquisition of other
companies in the rent-to-rent and corporate housing businesses. Although
previous acquisitions have been successful to date, there can be no assurance
that any additional acquisitions will be consummated or that, if acquisitions
are consummated, they will be successful. Acquisitions require a significant
commitment of corporate resources, management attention and capital which, in
certain cases, could exceed that available to Globe. Additionally, Globe could
experience unexpected costs and operational difficulties in integrating acquired
businesses.

         Many of Globe's competitors have greater financial and other resources
than Globe. These resources could give them an advantage in price and service
areas.

         Several of Globe's rental customers compete with Globe in its corporate
housing business. As Globe expands in the corporate housing area, it may
continue to lose rental business from those competitors.

         Globe is dependent on its computer systems in its daily operations. In
addition, Globe is developing a common computer system for its Corporate Stay
International business. Significant cost or time overruns on the Corporate Stay
International system development or unidentified deficiencies in other Globe
systems could have a material adverse affect on Globe's operations.

         While the Company is unaware of material adverse consequences related
to vendor or supplier Year 2000 non-compliance, it is possible that issues could
arise which would have a negative impact on Globe's operations.

         The Company believes that the industry it serves is significantly
influenced by economic conditions generally and by levels of job creation,
relocations of employees and general business activity. A prolonged economic
downturn could have a material adverse affect on Globe's operations.


                                      E-4
NO. 07-09-00395-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C SEPTEMBER 8, 2010

NORMAN CECIL DONOVAN, APPELLANT

v. DANIEL R. BECK, ET AL, APPELLEES

FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2009-548,685; HONORABLE LESLIE HATCH, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Norman Cecil Donovan, an inmate proceeding pro se , filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial cour t’s December 3, 2009 order of dismissal of his claims as frivolous, pursuant to chapter 14 of the Texa s Civil Practice and Remedies Code. We dismiss.
On January 13, 2010, Donovan filed a document with this Court entitled “Plaintiff’s Appellant Deprivation of Due Process Laws Day in Court on Discriminatory Laws,” in which Donovan made no citations to the record and cited no legal authority. Because of the document’s numer ous deficiencies, it was not construed by this Court to2 be Donovan’s appellate brief. As such, by letter dated May 13, 2010, this Court notified Donovan that his appellate brief was past due and directed him to file his brief on or before May 24, 2010. On May 24, 2010, Donov an filed a duplicate of the January 13, 2010 document. Upon realizing that D onovan intended this document to be his appellate brief, by letter dated May 27, 2010, this Court notified Donovan that his brief was deficient 1 and directed him to correct the defic iencies and re-file his brief on or before June 25, 2010. When Donovan failed to comply with the June 25 deadline, this Court notified Donovan of his failure and info rmed him that his corrected brief must be filed by August 9, 2010, or hi s appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id . at 42.3(b). Despite two notices and a reas onable time in which to comply with this Court’s directive, Donovan has failed to file a corrected brief or in any way respond.

1 The Court’s May 27, 2010 lette r identified the deficiencies in Donovan’s brief as follows: The brief is deficient in that it wholly fails to include the following: a. Identity of par ties and counsel; b. Table of contents; c. Index of authorities; d. Statement of the case; e. Issues presented; f. Statement of facts; and g. Prayer. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (f), (g), (j). Further, the brief does not include any references to the reco rd nor does it include any citations to authority. See id . at 38.1(d), (g), (i). Finally, the argument is indecipherable and appellant does not clearly state the nature of the relief sought. See id . at 38.1(i), (j).3 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for w ant of prosecution and for failure to comply with a deadline set by t he Clerk of this Court. See id . at 42.3(b)(c).

Mackey K. Hancock Justice
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16676]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 3, 2000, and May 10, 
2000, ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals, Inc., 2328 South Main Street, 
Assonet, Massachusetts 02702, made application by letter to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed 
below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Phenylacetone (8501).......................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to bulk manufacture amphetamine for a customer and 
to bulk manufacture the phenylacetone for the manufacture of the 
amphetamine.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than September 1, 2000.

    Dated: June 21, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-16676 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
§ 60-30.9 Interrogatories, and admissions as to facts and documents. ( a ) *Interrogatories.* Not later than 25 days prior to the date of the hearing, except for good cause shown, or not later than 14 days prior to such earlier date as the Administrative Law Judge may order, any party may serve upon an opposing party written interrogatories. Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless objected to. Answers are to be signed by the person making them and objections by the attorney or by whoever is representing the party. Answers and objections shall be filed and served within 25 days of service of the interrogatory.
( b ) *Admissions.* Not later than 14 days prior to the date of the hearing, except for good cause shown, or not later than 14 days prior to such earlier date as the Administrative Law Judge may order, any party may serve upon an opposing party a written request for the admission of the genuineness and authenticity of any relevant documents described in and exhibited with the request, or for the admission of the truth of any relevant matters of fact stated in the request. Each of the matters as to which an admission is requested shall be deemed admitted, unless within 25 days after service, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the requesting party a sworn statement either ( 1 ) denying specifically the matter as to which an admission is requested, or
( 2 ) setting forth in detail the reasons why he cannot truthfully either admit or deny such matters.
( c ) *Objections or failures to respond.* The party submitting the interrogatory or request may move for an order with respect to any objection or other failure to respond.