1 

### APPENDIX **B : NON**  **- RESPONSE BIAS ANALYSIS PLAN**  **Outline of the PIRLS 2016**  **Non -**  **r esponse Bias Analyses**  RTI International is planning to conduct a non -response bias analyses (NRBA) for schools if the response rate for original schools is below 85 percent . Currently, it is assumed that the student response rate for PIRLS 2016 will be above 85 percent and thus, no NRBA at the student level will be required. 

### PIRLS 2016 **School Non -**  **R esponse Bias Analysis Outline**  If needed, the NRBA will be conducted in the summer of 201 7 before the release of the PIRL S 2016 national report in December of 2017 . A summary of the findings will be included in the technical appendix of the U.S. national report and t

he full NRBA will be included in the U.S. technical report. **1. INTRODUCTION**  **2. METHODOLOGY**  The analysis will be conducted in three parts: 1. The distribution of the participating original school sample will be compared with that of the total eligible original school sampl e. The original sample is the sample before substitution. In each sample, schools will be weighted by their school base weights, excluding any non -response adjustment factor. 2. The distribution of the participating final sample, which includes the participating replacements for schools from the original sample that did not participate, will be compared to the total eligible final sample. The final sample is the sample after substitution. Again, school base weights will be used for both the eligible sample and the participating schools. 3. The same sets of schools will be compared as in the second analysis but, this time, when analyzing the participating schools alone, school nonresponse adjustments will be applied to the weights. The following categorical variables will be available for all schools:

 School type

—

public or private;  Locality

— urban - centric locale code, i.e., city, suburb, town, rural ;  Census region; and  Poverty level

—for public schools, a high poverty school is defined as one in which 50 percent or more of the students are eligible for participation in the National School Lunch Program (NSLP), and a low poverty school is defined as one in which less than 50 percent are eligible; all private schools are treated as low poverty schools. The following continuous variables will be available for all schools:

 Number of grade - eligible (grade 4 ) students enrolled;  Total number of students;2

 Mean p ercentage of students by race/ethnicity (White, non -Hispanic , Black, non -Hisp anic, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, and two or more races ) . An additional continuous variable, the percentage of students eligible to participate in the NSLP, will be available only for public schools. Two forms of analysis will be undertaken:

 A test of the independence of each school characteristic and participation status, and  A logistic regression in which the conditional independence of these school characteristics as predictors of participation will be examine d. For categorical variables, the distribution of frame characteristics for participants will be compared with the distribution for all eligible schools. The hypothesis of independence between the characteristic and participation status will be tested using a Rao - Scott modified Chi - square statistic at the 5 percent level (Rao and Thomas 2003). For continuous variables, summary means will be calculated and the difference between means will be tested using a t test. In addition to these tests, logistic regression models (including all characteristics) will be used to provide a multivariate analysis in which the conditional independence of these school characteristics as predictors of participation will be examined. The design for the analysis will include as a variable whether or not the school was asked to participate in ePIRLS . Detailed p lans will be included in the OMB submission for the main study. **3. RESULTS**  For each categorical or continuous variable , a table will be shown giving the percentage (or mean) for the participating and eligible populations along with the bias, relative bias, and the p - value of the test. Text summaries of the results will also be provided. The logistic regression results wil l be shown gi ving the parameter estimate, standard error, t test , and p - value. The results will be given for each analysis. 3.1 Original Respondent Sample

Categorical Variables Continuous Variables Logistic Regression Model 3.2 Respondent Sample with Replacements (Final Sample)

Categorical Variables Continuous Variables Logistic Regression Model 3.3 Final Sample with Nonresponse Adjustments Applied

Categorical Variables Continuous Variables **4 .**  **CONCLUSIONS** A summary of the results will be presented along with a conclusion on the effect of substitutes and the nonresponse weighting adjustment.