alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of ElixirGaming Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Gordon Yuen and David R.Reberger, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/Gordon Yuen                                        |   | Dated: | March 31,  2008 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------|
|   | Gordon Yuen                                           |   |   |                 |
| Title: | Chief  Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer |   |

 
| By:    | /s/David R. Reberger    |   | Dated: | March 31,  2008 |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------|
|   | David R. Reberger       |   |   |                 |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |                 |

 

This certification is made solely for thepurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standardcontained therein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Shannon Brooks , Appellant

No. 06

- 24

- 00031

- CV v.

Centre Station Apartments, LLC , Appellee Appeal from the 17th District Court of

Tarrant County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 017

- 332082

- 22 ). Panel consists of Chief Justice

Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief

Justice Stevens

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the agreed motion of the parties

to dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Shannon Brooks , has adequately indicated h er inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 7, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
# Comments on: 22-1016: CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP v. INGENIO, INC. [OPINION], Precedential
11/3/2014 GEORGE, OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS OFTEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 787J,U„ ©FFDG8AL 

### STATE OF TEXAS PENALTY FOR PR8VATE U SHERWOOD LYNN *- 4T

02 1R 0006557458 NOV04 2014

- .„-TM v, MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 78701 

### Tr. Ct^No. W09t54599-T(B) WR-75,961-07 

## On this day, the application for^1l:07 Writ.of*Ha'beas Corpus has been received 

# and presentedtothe Court.. ^^;^J3|^ *u~z>" " Abel Acosta, Clerk SHERWOOD LYNN GEORGE 

# RETURN TO SEND! NOT IN DALLAS COUNTY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                       124
<INVENTORY>                                      2,933
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,723
<PP&E>                                           6,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,433
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,606
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,419)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,394
<SALES>                                          1,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,215
<CGS>                                            1,399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      461
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (18)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (756)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-2359: MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L. [OPINION], Precedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cG4bOuVG0s\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-05-2023-21-2359-medtronic-inc-v-teleflex-innovations-sarl-opinion-21-2359-opinion-6-5-2023_2137076\/\">21-2359: MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L. [OPINION], Precedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/06-05-2023-21-2359-medtronic-inc-v-teleflex-innovations-sarl-opinion-21-2359-opinion-6-5-2023_2137076\/embed\/#?secret=cG4bOuVG0s\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-2359: MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L. [OPINION], Precedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"cG4bOuVG0s\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"OPINION Posted: MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L. [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-2359 Origin: PTO Precedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
099P16

#### State v. Daniel Lynn Bowlin

Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-701)

Denied
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JOEL AARON SILBERMAN,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 18-1022 (JEB)

DAVID J. SHULKIN, et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Pro se Plaintiff Joel Silberman filed a Complaint on April 30, 2018, against several 

individuals and the Veterans Medical Center, claiming he was assaulted at the Center. See ECF 

No. 1. When Defendants moved to dismiss, noting Plaintiff had failed to exhaust his 

administrative remedies under the Federal Tort Claims Act, see ECF No. 20, the Court instructed 

Plaintiff that he had to respond by March 27, 2019, or the motion would be granted as conceded. 

See ECF No. 21. As Plaintiff has filed no opposition, the Court will treat Defendant’s Motion as 

conceded and dismiss the case without prejudice. See LCvR 7(b). A contemporaneous Order 

will so state.

 

 /s/ James E. Boasberg 

 JAMES E. BOASBERG

 United States District Judge

Date: April 2, 2019
800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591

Sep 17 2010

Mr. Darren Smith

P.O. Box 17307 Minneapolis, MN 55417

Dear Mr. Smith:

In your February 23, 2010 letter, you petiti oned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to amend SFAR 73, paragraph 2(a)(1), of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

You have made some good points. However, when the FAA responds to petitions for rulemaking, it must follow the requirements of 14 CFR part 11, particularly those guidelines for processing petitions for rule making found in § 11.73. As stated in that section, the FAA uses the following criteria wh en making a decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking:

1) the immediacy of the safety or secu rity concerns the petition raises; 2) the priority of ot her FAA issues; and 3) the resources we have available to address these issues.

In SFAR 73, both certified flight instructor and certificated flight in structor are used to describe an instructor. The term “certified flig ht instructor” is commonly used to refer to the holder of a flight instructor certificate. The te rm is used in both industry and in many FAA publications. The common definition of cer tificated is “to testify to or authorized by a certificate; es pecially, certify.”

The FAA believes SFAR 73, paragraph (5), clearly establishes who may provide instruction or conduct a flight re view in a Robinson R-22 or R-44.2 For the reasons above, we are unable to c onsider and thereby deny your petition for rulemaking in accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73.

Accordingly, Docket No. FAA-2010-0188 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
No. 11-1208.

#### Sills *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 706 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 706

 To extend for 6 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of 
            title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1999

Mr. Smith of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend for 6 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of 
            title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law 105-277 is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``April 1, 1999'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``October 1, 1999'',
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``September 30, 1998'' and 
                inserting ``March 31, 1999'', and
                    (B) by striking ``October 1, 1998'' and inserting 
                ``April 1, 1999'', and
            (3) by striking subsection (c).

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on April 1, 
1999.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-70.

#### Barnett *v.*Carberry et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Solutions
Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period September 30, 2009 (the
"Report"), Praveen Nair, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1). To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                             DATE: November 13, 2009

                                             /S/ PRAVEEN NAIR
                                             ------------------------
                                             PRAVEEN NAIR
                                             CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33156

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF STRIKING ECF NO. 70

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court of the striking of ECF No. 70 as having been 

filed in error.

Respectfully submitted this 8th day of February 2023,

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 72 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/08/2023 Page 1 of 1
INCHES

Six legs

White 

spots

Long black antennae 

with white bands

Shiny 

black 

body

May have blue feet

Actual size

SEARCH FOR THE

ASIAN 

LONGHORNED 

BEETLE(also known as ALB)

Other “host” trees: elm, ash, London 

planetree, poplar, hackberry, mountain 

ash, mimosa, and katsura

Look for the beetle on 

or near the trees it likes:

Maple

Birch

Willow

Horsechestnut

REPORT IT AT 

www.beetlebusters.info

United States Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
www.beetlebusters.info

Capture and freeze the 

beetles you find, take photos, 

and report your sightings at

Issued February 2011 

Program Aid No. 2069

Round exit holes

Egg sites 

on bark

Larvae in 

chopped wood

Frass 

(wood shavings)

on bark or at 

tree base

Pupae in 

chopped wood

Adult ALB

Don’t move 

firewood— 

you could 

be moving 

the ALB.

LOOK FOR THE SIGNS

DON’T MOVE

You can see the adult ALB from 

June through October—but you 

can spot the signs year round!

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an 

equal opportunity provider and employer.
#### § 304-9.5 What if the employee is compensated by a donor and by us for the same expenses?

If you reimburse an employee for expenses that are also paid by a donor, you must establish and carry out policy in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5514 and the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR parts 900-904) to recover any excess amount paid to the employee.
# Comments on: 2022 Federal Circuit Judicial Conference
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended  December 31, 2008 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Lawrence A. Sala,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lawrence A. Sala
-------------------------------------
Lawrence A. Sala
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: January 29, 2010

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren,  Inc. and will be retained by Anaren,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       30
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended  December 31, 2008 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George A. Blanton, Sr.
Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ George A. Blanton
-------------------------------------
George A. Blanton
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date: January 29, 2010

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren,  Inc. and will be retained by Anaren,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       31
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Analogic Corporation (the
Company) for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, James W. Green, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 6, 2009



/s/ James W. GreenJames W. GreenPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 11-945.

#### Empresa Cubana Exportadora de Alimentos y Productos Varios, dba CUBAEXPORT *v.*Department of the Treasury et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

Pursuant to P.L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS scheduled for September 21-22, 2000 at the Madison Hotel, Washington, DC. The meeting of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS will take place of Thursday, September 21, and Friday, September 22 (8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Thursday and Friday) at the Madison Hotel, 1177 15th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20005. The meetings will be open to the public. 

The purpose of the subcommittee meetings will be to finalize any recommendations and assess the status of previous recommendations made to the Administration. The agenda of the Presidential Advisory Council of HIV/AIDS may include presentations from either of the Council's subcommittees, Services or Prevention. 

Daniel C. Montoya, Executive Director, Presidential Advisory Council on HIV and AIDS, Office of National AIDS Policy, 736 Jackson Place, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Phone (202) 456-2437, Fax (202) 456-2438, will furnish the meeting agenda and roster of committee members upon request. Any individual who requires special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Vanessa Vaughn at (301) 986-4870 no later than August 25, 2000. 

Daniel C. Montoya,

Executive Director, Presidential Advisory Council of HIV and AIDS. 

[FR Doc. 00-16779  Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3195-01-M
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

EIS GMBH,

Appellant

v.

NOVOLUTO GMBH,

Appellee

______________________ 

2021-2215, 2022-1020, 2022-1191

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-

01302, IPR2019-01444, IPR2020-00007.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

CHETAN BANSAL, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, 

argued for appellant. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI,

ALLAN SOOBERT, IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV. 

 TAMMY J. TERRY, Osha Bergman Watanabe & Burton 

LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented 

by CALIFF T. COOPER, LISA ERIN MARGONIS, PETER C.

SCHECHTER. 

 ______________________ 

Case: 21-2215 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 03/13/2023
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, PROST and 

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

March 13, 2023 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-2215 Document: 47 Page: 2 Filed: 03/13/2023