alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2











Certification
of Chief Executive Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the “Operating
Partnership”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:





(i)           the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Operating Partnership for the
year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating
Partnership.





Date:  February 27,
      2009
              /s/
      Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.Frank
      C. Marchisello, Jr.
                Vice
      President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
                Tanger
      GP Trust, sole general partner of the
Registrant
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  645,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                   306,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               443,772
<PP&E>                                       1,094,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                 268,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,497,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,385,018
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,705
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,044,921)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,497,434
<SALES>                                      2,302,913
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,302,913
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,301,124
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,635,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               413,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             155,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,633,501)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,787,328)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,787,328)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.89)
        

</TABLE>
### steam_record - Fwd: Fw: Co nemaugh Generatign Statio n, Request for Extension

>>> <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail. epa.gov> 6/23/2010 11:10 AM >>>

FYI - First extension request received!

----- Forwarded by Jezebele Alic ea/DC/USEPA/US on 06/23/2010 11:10 AM

-----
From: "Beer, Richard G" <rbeer@rrienergy.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Balog, John A" <jbalog@rrienergy.c om>, "Frank, Stephen" <SFr ank@rrienergy.com>, "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>

Date: 06/23/2010 10:49 AM

Subject: Conemaugh Generatign Station, Request for Extension

Please find attached a Request for Extension, Steam Electric ELG Questionnaire, Conemaugh Genera ting Station, Plant ID 02268.

Conemaugh Station PO Box K 1442 Power Plant Road New Florence, PA 15944 Tel: 724-235-4596 Fax: 724-235-4511 (See attached file: 20100623104147351.pdf) From: Deborah Bartram
To: steam_record
Date: 6/29/2010 6:12 PM Subject: Fwd: Fw: Conemaugh Generatign Station, Request for Extension
A ttachments: 20100623104147351.pd f 

### Pa g e 1 of 1

3/1/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C2A3793DO

...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

LISA ROVINSKY AND JOSEPH 

ROVINSKY, 

 Petitioners 

 v. 

LOURDESMONT/GOOD SHEPHERD 

YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, 

SISTERS OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD 

PROVINCE OF MID-NORTH AMERICA, 

METZ & ASSOCIATES, LTD, AND METZ 

CULINARY MANAGEMENT, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 527 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001004540
<NAME> AIRPLANES TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     9
<PP&E>                                             524
<DEPRECIATION>                                     142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               10
<BONDS>                                            363
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (150)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       391
<SALES>                                            (1)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   130
<CGS>                                             (58)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       40
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (9)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (9)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (9)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          13,188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                       554
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,631
<PP&E>                                          14,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,995
<BONDS>                                          5,635
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           728  
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,356
<SALES>                                        151,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,857
<CGS>                                          115,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    20
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,717
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77
        

</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 682

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to accelerate the phasein

of the $1,000,000 exclusion from the estate and gift taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. MCINNIS (for himself, Mr. WATKINS, Mr. PACKARD, and Mr. EHRLICH)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to accelerate

the phasein of the $1,000,000 exclusion from the estate

and gift taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Death Tax Relief Now

5 Act’’.
2

•HR 682 IH

1 SEC. 2. $1,000,000 EXEMPTION FROM ESTATE AND GIFT

2 TAXES.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 2010 of

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to applicable

5 credit amount) is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(c) APPLICABLE CREDIT AMOUNT.—

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this sec8 tion, the applicable credit amount is $345,800.

9 ‘‘(2) APPLICABLE EXCLUSION AMOUNT.—For

10 purposes of the provisions of this title which refer to

11 this subsection, the applicable exclusion amount is

12 $1,000,000.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 this section shall apply to estates of decedents dying, and

15 gifts made, after December 31, 1999.

Æ
#### § 60-3.10 Employment agencies and employment services.

A. *Where selection procedures are devised by agency.* An employment agency, including private employment agencies and State employment agencies, which agrees to a request by an employer or labor organization to devise and utilize a selection procedure should follow the standards in these guidelines for determining adverse impact. If adverse impact exists the agency should comply with these guidelines. An employment agency is not relieved of its obligation herein because the user did not request such validation or has requested the use of some lesser standard of validation than is provided in these guidelines. The use of an employment agency does not relieve an employer or labor organization or other user of its responsibilities under Federal law to provide equal employment opportunity or its obligations as a user under these guidelines.

B. *Where selection procedures are devised elsewhere.* Where an employment agency or service is requested to administer a selection procedure which has been devised elsewhere and to make referrals pursuant to the results, the employment agency or service should maintain and have available evidence of the impact of the selection and referral procedures which it administers. If adverse impact results the agency or service should comply with these guidelines. If the agency or service seeks to comply with these guidelines by reliance upon validity studies or other data in the possession of the employer, it should obtain and have available such information.
No. 10-11081.

#### Hoagland *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The spread of tax fraud byidentity theft [electronic resource] : : hearing before the Subcommittee onFiscal Responsibility and Economic Growth of the Committee on Finance, UnitedStates Senate, One Hundred Twelfth Congress.**
 
Parts: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:Y 4.F 49:S.HRG.112-491 | Y 4.F 49:S.HRG.112-708
Item Number:1038-C (online)
CGP systemNumber:000877030
 
August 19, 2019
No. 10-11162.

#### Marron *v.*Adams, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-930; COC-60653]


Notice of Meeting on Proposed Withdrawal; Spanish Peaks Planning 
Area; Colorado

June 20, 2000.
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and agenda for a 
forthcoming meeting on the Forest Service withdrawal application for 
the Spanish Peaks Planning Area for the protection of natural 
resources. This meeting will provide the opportunity for public 
involvement in this proposed action as required by regulation. All 
comments will be considered when a final determination is made on 
whether this land should be withdrawn.

DATES: Meeting will be held on September 12, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. All 
comments or requests to be heard should be received by close of 
business on September 7, 2000, at the Colorado State Office.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Walsenburg Community Center, 
Walsenburg, Colorado, 81089.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris E. Chelius, BLM Colorado State 
Office, (303) 239-3706.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Notice of Proposed Withdrawal for the 
Spanish Peaks Planning Area which was published in the Federal Register 
on June 20, 1997, (62 FR 33675), is hereby modified to schedule a 
public meeting as provided by 43 U.S.C. 1714, and 43 CFR 2310.
    This meeting will be open to all interested persons; those who 
desire to be heard in person and those who desire to submit written 
comments on this subject. All comments and requests to be heard should 
be submitted to the Colorado State Director, Bureau of Land Management, 
2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7093, by September 7, 
2000.

Herbert K. Olson,
Acting Realty Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-16464 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.19


SECOND AMENDMENT
to the 
Dover Corporation 
Pension Replacement Plan 
(As Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2010)
WHEREAS, Dover Corporation (the “Corporation”) has heretofore adopted the Dover Corporation Pension Replacement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2010 (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Benefits Committee of the Plan deems it advisable to amend the Plan to make certain changes deemed desirable by the Benefits Committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue and in exercise of the power granted to the  Benefits Committee under Article 9 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the date below written, by adding the following two new sentences at the end of Section 7.05 of the Plan:
"A claimant must follow the claims procedure forth in this Section 7.05 (and comply with all applicable deadlines established as part thereof) as a condition to the receipt of any benefits claimed under the Plan, and as a condition to the availability of any other relief under or with respect to the Plan.  If a claimant follows the claims procedure and his or her final appeal is denied, in whole or in part, under this Section  7.05, he or she will have one year following the date of the final determination of an appeal under this Section 7.05 to file a lawsuit with respect to that claim, and failure to meet the one-year deadline will extinguish his or her right to file a lawsuit with respect to that claim."


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Benefits Committee has caused this amendment to be executed by its duly authorized member, this 28 day of November, 2016.




	
		
	 
	The Benefits Committee

	 
	By: /s/ Ivonne M. Cabrera
#### § 302-9.206 What should I do if there is no port or terminal at my authorized point of origin or authorized destination when I transport a POV from my post of duty?

If there is no port or terminal at your authorized point of origin or authorized destination, your agency will pay the entire cost of transporting the POV from your authorized origin to your authorized destination. If you prefer, however, you may choose to drive your POV to the port of embarkation and/or from the port of debarkation. If you choose to drive, you will be reimbursed in the same manner as an employee under § 302-9.104.
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1


FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
As of October 17, 2016
The following sets forth the fees and other payments that non-employee directors of Franklin Resources, Inc. (“Franklin”) are entitled to receive as members of the Board of Directors of Franklin (the “Franklin Board”). The Franklin Board last approved changes in such compensation structure on October 17, 2016.
The non-employee Franklin director designated by the independent directors of the Franklin Board as the lead independent director of the Franklin Board is entitled to receive an annual lead director retainer fee of $20,000 (one-fourth of which is paid quarterly).
Non-employee Franklin directors are entitled to receive an annual Franklin Board retainer fee of $85,000 (one-fourth of which is paid quarterly), plus $5,000 for each Franklin Board meeting attended by such director in excess of the five regularly scheduled Franklin Board meetings per fiscal year.
Non-employee Franklin directors are also entitled to receive an annual equity award for approval on the date of each annual organizational meeting of the Franklin Board (“Annual Organizational Meeting”). Effective as of the next Annual Organizational Meeting, scheduled to be held on February 15, 2017, the annual equity award shall be valued at $135,000 (rounded up to the nearest whole share), reflecting an increase in value of $10,000 in the annual equity award.
Non-employee Franklin directors who serve on Franklin Board committees are entitled to be paid $1,500 per committee meeting attended. Additionally, the Chairperson of the Franklin Audit Committee is entitled to receive an annual retainer fee of $15,000 (one-fourth of which is paid quarterly), and the Chairpersons of the Franklin Compensation Committee and the Franklin Corporate Governance Committee are each entitled to receive an annual retainer fee of $10,000 (one-fourth of which is paid quarterly).
In addition, Franklin reimburses directors for certain expenses incurred in connection with attending Franklin Board and committee meetings as well as other related events, including travel, hotel accommodations, meals and other incidental expenses for the director and his or her spouse accompanying the director in connection with such events. Franklin may also, from time to time, provide directors and their spouses with token gifts of nominal value.
Franklin also allows directors to defer payment of their directors’ fees, and to treat the deferred amounts as hypothetical investments in Franklin common stock or Franklin Templeton mutual funds. The terms of any such deferred payment arrangements are set forth in separate documentation between Franklin and the particular directors in accordance with Franklin’s 2006 Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. ANTHONY ADAMO, DEFENDANT.

Bergen County Court Law Division

Decided April 20, 1951.

*279
      *Mr. Francis V. D. Lloyd,*Deputy Attorney-General and Acting Prosecutor of Bergen County *(Mr. Max Fisenstein,*Deputy Attorney-General, appearing), for the State of New Jersey.

*Messrs. Kapp Brothers*(by *Mr. Leon W. Kapp,*appearing), for the defendant.

Vasbejiwajrt, J. C. C.

Defendant, under date of March 13, 1951, noticed a motion before this court to dismiss and quash indictment No. -17,011 because it contravenes the Constitution of the State of New Jersey (1947), *Article X, paragraph*3, as well as the Eules governing the New Jersey Courts, *Rule*2 :4-ll.

Counsel for the defendant alleges that the indictment should be quashed because it concludes with the words “ * * * against the peace, of lhe State, the Government and dignity of the same” whereas the Constitution in *Article X, paragraph*3, is as follows: “ * * * and all indictments shall conclude: ‘against the peace of this State, the Government and dignity of the same.’ ”

Likewise, *Buie 2*:4-ll in the fifth line recites “ * * * But every indictment shall conclude: ‘against the peace of this State, the government and dignity of the same.’ ”

Argument was heard and cases cited. Prior to decision upon the motion the Deputy Attorney-General, for the State, *280moved to amend Indictment No.- 17,011 wherein the State of New Jersey is the plaintiff and Anthony Adamo is the defendant, so that the same shall conclude with the words “contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace of this State, the Government and dignity of the same.” Decision was reserved upon both motions.

It is the decision of this court that the motion of the Deputy Attorney-General and Acting Prosecutor of the Pleas of Bergen County to amend the indictment in the manner indicated shall be granted, and an order may be presented to that effect, *viz.:*that the concluding words of Indictment No. 17,011 shall be: “contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, against the peace of this State, the Government and dignity of the same,” instead of its present reading: “contrary to the-form of the statute in such case made and provided, against the peace of the State, the Government and dignity of the' same.”

This decision is made in accordance with the authority provided in the Rules governing the New Jersey Courts, *Rule*2:4-13, and by reason of this decision the motion to quash the indictment is denied.