alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4323 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4323

             To require ammunition to bear serial numbers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 1994

Mr. Blackwell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To require ammunition to bear serial numbers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERIAL NUMBERS REQUIRED FOR AMMUNITION.

    (a) In General.--Section 923(i) of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(i)''; and
            (2) by adding after and below the end the following:
    ``(2) Licensed importers and licensed manufacturers shall identify, 
by means of a serial number engraved on the inside of the shell of each 
item of ammunition, in such manner as the Secretary shall by 
regulations prescribe, each item of ammunition imported or manufactured 
by the importer or manufacturer.''.
    (b) Recordkeeping.--
            (1) In general.--Subparagraphs (1)(A) and (2) of section 
        923(g)(1) of such title are each amended by inserting ``and 
        ammunition'' after ``firearms''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 923(g)(2) of such title 
        is amended by inserting ``or an item of ammunition'' after 
        ``firearm''.
    (c) Inspections.--Subparagraphs (B)(iii) and (C)(ii) of section 
923(g)(1) of such title are each amended by inserting ``or items of 
ammunition'' after ``firearms''.
    (d) Gun Shows.--Section 923(j) of such title is amended in each of 
the 2nd and 5th sentences by inserting ``and ammunition'' after 
``firearms''.
    (e) Central Registration.--Section 926(a) of such title is amended 
by inserting after the 2nd sentence the following: ``The preceding 
sentence shall not apply with respect to ammunition.''.

                                 <all>
```
FERRY CROSSING

FERRY CROSSING

GULF OF

MEXICO

ca Grande Key

Man Key

Cottrell Key

Boca grande

Key

Barracouta

Keys

Ballast

Key

Joe Ingram

Key

Crawfish Key

Woman

Key

Big Mullet Key

Archer Key

Little Mullet Key

Lakes

Passage

Straits of Florida

West

Channel

Lavina

Bank

Marquesas

Keys East

Cottrell

Key

Key

West

Bay

Keys

00 01

23

13

4

27

17

99 05 07

20

14

22

13

4 10

22

01 07 10

19

18

16

10

00 02 04 09 11 E

12

16

09

17

32'

14

02

20

11

N

04

4 4

27

11

27

27

52'

23

82°

4

30'

82°

18

3

N

15

21

27

15

08

35'

99 05

27

27

27

4

57'

27

4

24°37'

27

LH MH

FEET

4

08 11

12

E

19 27

4

4 4

30"

27

30"

000

27

4

27

55'

06

27

30"

30'

FEET

30"

000

4 4

000 4

00'

000m

FEET

27

330

4

35'

81°

FEET

27

70

000m

3

55'

27

27

32'

21

27

30"

52'

24° 4

360 000m 81°

37'

4

27

57'

4

30"

27

00'

100

27

30"

24°

000

27

27

30"

27

06

4 4

27

LH

24°

000m

MH

4

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

FLORIDA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

COTTRELL KEY, FL

2012

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

COTTRELL KEY QUADRANGLE

FLORIDA-MONROE CO.

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Imagery......................................................NAIP, May 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours..........................................................Not Available

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 17R

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Florida Coordinate System of 1983 (east

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.3

CONTOURS NOT PRESENT BECAUSE AVAILABLE ELEVATION

DATA DO NOT MEET ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

LH MH

4 00

17R

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2012 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 23 ́

7 MILS

4° 48 ́

85 MILS
_________________________________________ 

 

____________________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 10, 2007 

133527 

IN THE MATTER OF 

HONORABLE JEANETTE O’BANNER-OWENS 

JUDGE, 36th DISTRICT COURT 

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

On order of the Court, the request by the Judicial Tenure Commision for 

appointment of a master is considered and Honorable Vesta Svenson is appointed Master 

to hear Formal Complaint No. 80. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 10, 2007 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3351]

# AGENCY: 

United States Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Van Gogh to Mondrian: Dutch Works on Paper,”                               ( print page 40716)                            imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, MA from on or about July 25, 2000 to on or about November 5, 2000, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Paul Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-5997). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, S.W., Room 700, Washington, D.C. 20547-0001.

Dated: June 23, 2000.

William B. Bader,

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State.

[FR Doc. 00-16609 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of LipidViro Tech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Thomas J. Howells, President and Chief Executive Officer and Shelley Goff, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:August 2, 2010By:/s/Thomas J. HowellsThomas J. Howells, President and Chief Executive Officer  Date:August 2, 2010By:/s/Shelley GoffShelley Goff, Treasurer
No. 11-137.

#### Baptista *v.*JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A., aka Washington Mutual Bank.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-1156.

#### Bernal *v.*Cherry et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Toval, Appellant.

[628 NYS2d 401]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.), rendered June 15, 1993, convicting him of *501criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the challenges to two prospective jurors for cause. We note this issue was only preserved for appellate review as to one juror, because only the counsel for a codefendant, and not the counsel for the defendant, raised an objection to the other juror the defendant now challenges. In any event, "[t]he determination as to whether a prospective juror can provide reasonable jury service in a given case is left largely to the discretion of the trial court, which can question and observe the prospective juror during voir dire” *(People v Pagan,*191 AD2d 651, 651-652; *see also, People v Holder,*204 AD2d 482). Neither prospective juror possessed a state of mind which would have precluded the defendant from receiving a fair trial *(see,*CPL 270.20).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Pizzuto, J. P., Hart, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32(b)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly Keller
Koeppel, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Holly Keller
Koeppel____________


Holly
Keller Koeppel


Chief
Financial Officer








August 1,
2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE INVESTMENT CORPORATION FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           969,584
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      33,568
<MORTGAGE>                                      88,159
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      570
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,555,407
<CASH>                                          21,902
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               9,179
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         249,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,040,350
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                320,147
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             43,184
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  63,613
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,088,024
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 53,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          103,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,178
<OTHER-SE>                                     205,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,040,350
<PREMIUMS>                                      76,650
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             28,322
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 153
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     577
<BENEFITS>                                      48,422
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      9,527
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            29,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,080
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,104
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  65,057
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Adams, Kevin (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: DearMrAdams, Penny Green [akemerald@starband.net] Saturday, July 17, 2010 4:44 PM Adams, Kevin (OST) Re: Carrier Selection Order at Lake Minchumina

This is a personal comment from Tom and Penny Green as was our letterofJulylO,201O that in NO way shape or form represented a change in the earlier letterfrom the Home Owner's Association with the majority requesting Wright as the carrier. We are deeply sorry ifthis caused confusion on your part and we want the record corrected to reflect the July 10,2010 letter as aPERSONAL one NOT representing the Home Owner's Association. We respectfullyrequest that you honorthe letter from the HomeOwner's as representing the community with the majority requesting Wright Air. Though we would gain personallybyWarbelow's selection as others here would with Wright Air we deeply respect the governing body ofthe Home Owner's Association to represent this community in all matters concerned and in no way would we attempt to dilute that authority. Respectfully Submitted, Thomas and Penny Green local residents ofLake Minchumina OnFri, Ju116, 2010 at 8:35 AM, <Kevin.Adams@dot.gov> wrote: Hi,

Attached is ahopefully self-explanatory order selectingWarbelow's for EAS at Lake Minchumina. As always, ifyou have any questions, please give me a call.

Kevin 202-366-1047

1
No. 11-9316.

#### Flores *v.*Holder, Attorney General, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further *984petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*
From: Cogliano, Gerain 

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 1:24 PM

To: Jones, Danielle <Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov>

Subject: EO 12866 RMP NPRM: SBA concern--3 sentences for a potential preamble insert

Importance: High

Hi Danielle, 

Here is the revised language:

Proposed §§ 68.59(c)(2) and 68.80(c)(2), if finalized, would include requirements for the retention of 

reports and records by the third-party auditors. Proposed §§ 68.59(c)(3) and 68.80(c)(3), if finalized, 

would require the audit report to be submitted to the implementing agency at the same time, or before, 

it is provided it to the owner or operator. Finally, EPA is proposing in §§ 68.59(c)(4) and 68.80(c)(4) that 

the audit report and related records cannot be claimed as attorney-client communications or as 

attorney work products even if the auditors are themselves, or are managed by or report to, attorneys. 

With respect to the attorney work product privilege, the audit report and related records are produced 

to document compliance rather than in anticipation of litigation, just like a monitoring report required 

by an air emission rule would not be produced in anticipation of litigation. With respect to the attorneyclient communication privilege, the third party auditor is arms-length and independent of the stationary 

source being audited. The auditor lacks an attorney-client relationship with counsel for the audited 

entity. Therefore, neither the audit report nor the records related to the audit report, provided to the 

third party auditor are attorney-client privileged (including documents originally prepared with 

assistance or under the direction of the audited source’s attorney). EPA seeks comment on these 

proposed requirements including any legal concerns that may result from the provision that limits 

attorney-related privileges.

Gerain
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly report of Lipidviro Tech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Kenneth Hamik, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date:August 14, 2008By:/s/Kenneth HamikKenneth Hamik, Presiden and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-1044.

#### Bunch, Individually and as Guardian of the Person and Estate of Bunch, an Incapacitated Adult *v.*Tomicic et al.

Ct. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
113P16

#### State v. Austin Lynn Miller

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-636)

1. Allowed 03/31/2016

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*

3. State’s Notice of Appeal Based üpon a Constitutional

3.

4. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. §

4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         146
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                   20
<INVENTORY>                                    176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,429
<PP&E>                                         2,821
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          67,630
<BONDS>                                        511
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,331
<OTHER-SE>                                     (75,872)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (2,521)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,422
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (86)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (86)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (86)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.05)


</TABLE>