alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Report 106-395]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
  1st Session           HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                106-395

======================================================================

 
   AGREEING TO THE CONFERENCE REQUESTED BY THE SENATE ON H.R. 3064, 
             DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2000

                                _______
                                

  October 18, 1999.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 333]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 333, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                  SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the disagreement by the House 
on the Senate amendment to the bill, H.R. 3064, the District of 
Columbia Appropriations Act, 2000, and the agreement by the 
House to the conference requested by the Senate thereon.

                                


```
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1231 CA 11-01072**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ.

JOAN M. DOMIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF CHRISTIAN KATHERINE DOMIN, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

STARPOINT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

LAW OFFICE OF J. MICHAEL HAYES, BUFFALO (J. MICHAEL HAYES OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BAXTER SMITH & SHAPIRO, P.C., WEST SENECA (LOUIS B. DINGELDEY, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered November 29, 2010 in a personal injury action. The order granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
§ 101.1017 Requesting regulatory status. ( a ) *Initial applications.* An applicant will specify on FCC Form 601 if it is requesting authorization to provide services on a common carrier basis, a non-common carrier basis, or on both a common carrier and non-common carrier basis.
( b ) *Amendment of pending applications.* ( 1 ) Any pending application may be amended to: ( i ) Change the carrier status requested, or
( ii ) Add to the pending request in order to obtain both common carrier and non-common carrier status in a single license.
( 2 ) Amendments to change, or add to, the carrier status in a pending application are minor amendments pursuant to § 1.927 of this chapter.
( c ) *Modification of license.* ( 1 ) A licensee may modify a license to: ( i ) Change the carrier status authorized, or
( ii ) Add to the status authorized in order to obtain both common carrier and non-common carrier status in a single license.
( 2 ) Applications to change, or add to, the carrier status in a license are modifications not requiring prior Commission authorization filed under § 1.927 of this chapter. If the change results in the discontinuance, reduction, or impairment of an existing service, the licensee is also governed by § 101.305(b) or (c) and submits the application under § 1.927 of this chapter in conformance with the time frames and requirements of §§ 101.305 (b) or (c).
[62 FR 23168, Apr. 29, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 68984, Dec. 14, 1998]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2021-1896: Bryant v. DVA - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uTZYk7tDAM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-14-2022-2021-1896-bryant-v-dva-audio-uploaded\/\">2021-1896: Bryant v. DVA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-14-2022-2021-1896-bryant-v-dva-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=uTZYk7tDAM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2021-1896: Bryant v. DVA” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"uTZYk7tDAM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Bryant v. DVA (mp3) Appeal Number: 2021-1896 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
Memorandum 

U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Subject: 

To: 

Notice of Commun· 

DOT-OST-OST 

communication. 

Washington National 

tions) 

Date: 

ment rules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the following 

On March 4, 2013, during a telephone conversation with former Representative 

Dan Boren of Oklahoma, Mr. Boren raised the subject ofthe Department's 

proceeding to allocate two slot exemptions for operations between Ronald Reagan 

Washington National Airport (DCA) and airports within the 1,250-mile DCA 

perimeter. Mr. Boren expressed his support for US Airways application to provide 

service between DCA and Oklahoma City. 

I informed Mr. Boren that, while I appreciated his interest in this case, I could not 

comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by 

the Department. 

Please place this memorandum in the appropriate Docket. 

cc: Dan Boren
§ 0.13 Functions of the Office. The Office of Inspector General is directly responsible to the Chairperson as head of the agency. However, the Chairperson may not prevent or prohibit the Office of Inspector General from carrying out its duties and responsibilities as mandated by the Inspector General Act Amendments of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-504) and the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. Appendix 3), as amended. ( a ) Provide policy direction for and to conduct, supervise and coordinate audits and investigations relating to the programs and operations of the Federal Communications Commission.
( b ) Review existing and proposed legislation and regulations relating to programs and operations of the Commission and to make recommendations in its required semiannual reports to Congress concerning the impact of such legislation or regulations on the economy and efficiency in the administration of these programs and operations, or the prevention and detection of fraud and abuse in such programs and operations.
( c ) Recommend policies and conduct or coordinate other activities to promote economy and efficiency in the administration of Commission programs, or detect and prevent fraud and abuse in Commission activities. Coordinate with other governmental agencies and non-governmental entities on these matters.
( d ) Keep the Chairperson of the Commission—and through him or her the other Commissioners—and the Congress fully and currently informed concerning fraud and other serious problems, abuses, and deficiencies relating to the administration of Commission programs and operations; recommend corrective action and report on the progress made in implementing such corrective action. In addition to providing the Chairperson with the results of completed audits and inspections, the Inspector General shall prepare statutorily required reports, identified as such, to include: ( 1 ) Semiannual reports summarizing activities of the office during the preceding six-month period (due to the Chairperson by April 30 and October 31);
( 2 ) Special reports specifically identifying any serious or flagrant problems, abuses or deficiencies (due to the Chairperson immediately upon discovery of these matters by the Inspector General).
[54 FR 15194, Apr. 17, 1989, as amended at 88 FR 21427, Apr. 10, 2023]
No. 10-11072.

#### Bastedo *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-8951.

#### Michuda *v.*Minnesota et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.30

[WarehouseBank, a Unit of GMAC Bank
Letterhead]

September 23, 2003

E-Loan
   5875 Arnold Road
   Dublin, CA  94569

Re:	Sale of Credit Agreement

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is hereby made to the Warehouse Credit Agreement which we have
entered into with you on November 1, 2001 (the "Credit
Agreement").

We wish to notify you that we desire to exercise our rights under Section
11.03 of the Credit Agreement and sell to GMAC Mortgage Corporation, a
Pennsylvania corporation ("GMACM") all of our rights and obligations
under the Credit Agreement.  Pursuant to such sale, GMACM shall be entitled to
all of the rights and benefits of, and shall be solely responsible for the
performance of the obligations and liabilities of, "Lender"
thereunder.

So that we may maintain a record or your receipt of this letter for our
files, kindly execute the enclosed copy of this letter where indicated below and
return it to the undersigned.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Doulong

Sr. Vice President



The foregoing is accepted and agreed to this 24th day of
September, 2003.

E-LOAN, INC.

By:  /s/ Joseph Kennedy

President

---
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-33214, No. 333-47824, No. 333-136863 and No. 333-153772) on Form S-8 of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2010relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/S/    MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Chicago, Illinois 

March 12, 2010
No. 11-53.

#### Chadda *v.*Block.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a)**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John C. Fanning, Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of COMFORCE Corporation, hereby certify that: 

 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 4, 2005 

 

/s/ John C. Fanning 

----
H. R. 4192

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 3000 Veterans Drive

in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ‘‘Arturo R. Watlington, Sr. Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States Post Office building located at 3000 Veterans

Drive in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Arturo R. Watlington, Sr. Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the building referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Arturo R.

Watlington, Sr. Post Office.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,220
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,220
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          175,831
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       285,165
<OTHER-SE>                                   (456,776)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,220
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,571
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,571)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
rik. n f'1 " I \ 

## 4: r r

:A it 

## INI4tEt4iell IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 21-0395
L.B. individually and on behalfofD.B.,a Minor,

Plaintiffand Appellant,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS;DANA BULLCOMING, agent ofthe Bureau ofIndian Affairs sued in his individual capacity,

Defendants and Appellees. 

# FILED AUG 1 7 2021
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprern.a Court State of Montana
ORDER

In accordance with M. R. App. P. 15, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has certified to this Court the following question oflaw,which has arisen in that court's Cause No. 20-35514: Under Montana law, do law-enforcement officers act within the course and scope of their employment when they use their authority as on-duty officers to sexually assault members ofthe public? This Court accepts the certified question on the relevant facts set forth in the Ninth Circuit Court's certification ofthe question. In accordance with M.R. App.P. 15(4), we reserve any determination whether to reformulate the question pending full consideration ofthe issue. We will answer the question in due course following briefing. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties shall, in accordance with the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure, prepare, file, and serve briefs addressing the certified question set forth above, with the opening brief ofthe Plaintiff and Appellant to be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order. Thereafter, additional briefing shall proceed in accordance with the Montana Rules ofAppellate Procedure. 08/17/2021

Case Number: OP 21-0395The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord for the

parties in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Cause No. 20-35514, and to the Clerk of Court for the Ninth Circuit Court ofAppeals. DATED this 1 t' clay ofAugust, 2021.

ChiefJustice



# e9oi xi 411, 

# -6/ 1 -0•-• 

# g

Justices
No. 11-1093.

#### Breneisen et al. *v.*Motorola, Inc.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 60-30.2 Waiver, modification.

Upon notice to all parties, the Administrative Law Judge may, with respect to matters pending before him modify or waive any rule herein upon a determination that no party will be prejudiced and that the ends of justice will be served thereby.

[43 FR 49259, Oct. 20, 1978; 43 FR 51401, Nov. 3, 1978]
AmeriCorps NCCC Southwest Region at a Glance 

AmeriCorps NCCC is a national service program whose 

mission is to strengthen communities and develop leaders 

through direct, team-based national and community service. 

Within a full-time, residential setting, AmeriCorps NCCC 

members are assigned to a regional campus and placed onto 

teams of eight to 12 members. Over the course of their 10-

month service term, each team will complete a series of 

different projects in different places, with each project lasting 

three to 13 weeks. Members work on projects with 

sponsoring organizations to address local community needs 

in the areas of energy conservation, environmental 

stewardship, infrastructure improvement, natural and other 

disaster services, and urban and rural development. 

See what project sponsors in the Southwest Region are saying 

about AmeriCorps NCCC project teams: 

AmeriCorps NCCC Southwest Region 

Sponsors by the Numbers 

Among project sponsors that hosted an AmeriCorps 

NCCC Southwest Region team... 

94% were satisfied or very satisfied with the 

AmeriCorps NCCC team’s work. 

92% believed their AmeriCorps NCCC team met the 

community’s primary need completely or to a large 

extent. 

89% believed to a large or moderate extent that the 

AmeriCorps NCCC team’s efforts strengthened the local 

community. 

88% believed their organization accomplished its work 

faster because of their AmeriCorps NCCC team. 

For more information on these findings, see the NCCC Sponsor 

Survey report. 

About the Southwest Region 

The AmeriCorps NCCC Southwest Region 

includes Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, 

Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and 

Wyoming. Its projects often involve disaster 

response and environmental conservation. Visit 

the AmeriCorps site for current Southwest 

Region projects. 

Questions? Email the regional campus at 

NCCCSouthwest@cns.gov. 

Interested in AmeriCorps NCCC? Visit the 

AmeriCorps site for more information on 

serving as a member or to have your 

organization become a project sponsor. 

About the Office of Research and Evaluation 

The AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation assists 

AmeriCorps and its partners in collecting, analyzing, and 

disseminating data and insights about AmeriCorps programs 

and civic life in America. 

“This NCCC team showed consistent dedication 

and enthusiasm throughout their term in San 

Marcos. It was an absolute pleasure to work with 

them and their work has made a tremendous 

positive impact on this community.” 

─ AmeriCorps NCCC project sponsor ─

Produced and published at US taxpayer expense | 2023
§ 115-1.104-50 Publication of EPPMR. ( a ) Material published in the EPPMR will generally not be of interest to nor directly affect the public. Therefore, most EPPMR material will not be published in the Federal Register.
( b ) Arrows printed in the margin of a page indicate material changed, deleted, or added by the EPPMR Transmittal Notice cited at the bottom of that page. (See GSA, FPMR Amendment Transmittal pages for illustrations.)