alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      13.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. § 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Jennifer Dawson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
        June 29, 2006





/s/
      Jennifer Dawson Name:
        Jennifer Dawson
 Title:
        Chief Financial Officer
S89A0515.

#### HARPER v. EVANS et al.

(387 SE2d 894)

Decided November 30, 1989.

James Shivers Harper, *pro se.*

*Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Daryl A. Robinson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Neal B. Childers, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellees.

Smith, Justice.

This Court finds the issues raised in this appeal to be moot. It is therefore dismissed.

*Case dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 51-8.2 Proactive Disclosures.

Records that the Committee is required to make available for public inspection in an electronic format may be accessed through the Committee's public website: *www.abilityone.gov*. The Committee is responsible for determining which of its records must be made publicly available, for identifying additional records of interest to the public that are appropriate for public disclosure, and for posting and indexing such records. The Committee shall ensure that its website of posted records and indices is reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis. The Committee's FOIA Public Liaison contact information is available at *https://www.abilityone.gov/laws,_regulations_and_policy/foia.html*.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000005657
<NAME> AMERICAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                         372,000
<SECURITIES>                                   250,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,656,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   496,000
<INVENTORY>                                 16,723,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,288,000
<PP&E>                                      45,572,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,352,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,943,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,369,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,057,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,298,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,943,000
<SALES>                                     31,599,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,658,000
<CGS>                                       20,986,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,059,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,694,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             379,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,599,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   863,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,736,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Richard E. Otto, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Corautus Genetics Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Reserved; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 20, 2006
#### § 109-38.401-2 Use of self-service pumps.

It is DOE policy that motor vehicle operators shall use self-service pumps in accordance with the provisions of 41 CFR 101-38.401-2.
4/12/2016 U.S. Dept. ofTransportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, 

### SE., Washington, DC 20590 Submitted Electronicallyvia the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Dear Sir or Madam: CourtrightAerial Services, LLC, (hereinafter referred to as "CAS") has prepared the following addendum to Exemption 

### # 15135 under Docket FAA-2015-6312 This addendum adds any aircraft identified onthe List ofApproved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) underSection 333 at regulatory docket FAA-2007-3330 atwww.regulations.gov, (which is updated regularly) when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Allowingthe use ofany aircraft on the List ofApproved Unmanned Systems (UAS) has been used recently in exemptions:

• Exemption No

. 15821 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-6626 The exemption listed above is similar in nature to CAS's exemption and therefore no new precedent would be set by extendingthe same List to CAS. This addendum makes no other changes to the currently approved exemption 15135, reasons for exemption request, and/oroperating parameters. Sincerely, !

N 

# J trcA .\) Nick Courtright Courtright Aerial Services, LLC 5809 Kean Rd. Westerville, Ohio 43082 Phone: 614-467-0558 Email: N.Courtright@gmail.com
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP00-391-000]

Take notice that on June 19, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company, (ANR) petitioned the Commission pursuant to Rule 207 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207 for authorization to reacquire certain firm transportation capacity that it has historically held on Viking Gas Transmission Company (Viking).

In its Petition, ANR explained that the capacity at issue was released/assigned by ANR to its former sales customers at the direction of the Commission as part of the Order No. 636 restructuring process. ANR also advised that, although some of that Viking capacity is no longer desired by those customers, it is still required by ANR to ensure its ability to obtain flowing gas volumes in order to meet its existing firm service requirements in certain parties of western Wisconsin. ANR has requested that the Commission act on its Petition no later than September 1, 2000.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 29, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16420  Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
S89A0411.

#### GOODWIN v. KNIGHTEN.

(387 SE2d 887)

Decided February 7, 1990

Reconsideration denied February 21, 1990.

*Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, C. A. Benjamin Woolf, Sell & Melton, Rick W. Griffin,*for appellant.

*William F. Mabe,*for appellee.

Hunt, Justice.

This is an appeal by the warden from the grant of habeas relief to the petitioner. Knighten, the petitioner, pled guilty but mentally ill to one count each of armed robbery, aggravated assault, and burglary, and was sentenced to serve three concurrent sentences of eighteen years. In granting the petition, the habeas court found: the robbery and assault counts merged, the guilty plea was involuntary, and a factual basis for the plea had not been proven.

The trial court’s findings relative to the guilty plea proceedings are supported by the record. The warden insists a claim of merger is not cognizable under OCGA § 9-14-1 et seq., or, in any event, is barred by the plea. Assuming Knighten could, under a proper plea, be sentenced for both offenses, the determination by the trial court that the plea was involuntary disposes of the issue on appeal.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. ER99-3094-001, ER99-3092-001]

Take notice that on June 9, 2000, Central Maine Power Company (CMP), tendered for filing a compliance filing pursuant to an April 26, 2000, Letter Order issued in the above-referenced dockets.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests shuld be filed on or before July 7, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16574  Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 14, 2018

Order 

Clerk

December 14, 2018

158757(19)

ALCOA ENGINEERED STRUCTURES,

Petitioner-Appellant,

SC: 158757

v COA: 343604

Oakland CC: 2017-160310-AA

MICHIGAN OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND

HEALTH ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent-Appellee.

__________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of respondent-appellee to extend the time 

for filing its answer is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted 

on or before January 9, 2019.
§ 301-11.200 Under what circumstances may my agency prescribe a reduced per diem rate lower than the prescribed maximum? Under the following circumstances: ( a ) When your agency can determine in advance that lodging and/or meal costs will be lower than the per diem rate; and
( b ) The lowest authorized per diem rate must be stated in your travel authorization in advance of your travel.
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 2502 Lower Tribunal No. 20 18

- CA

- 010536

- O

_____________________________ D ANIEL K. W ELLS and K IMBERLY S. W ELLS ,

Appellan ts ,
v. H OLIDAY I NN C LUB V ACATIONS , I N C

. ,

Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County

.

Vincent S. Chiu , Judge. May 28, 2024
PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. TRAVER , C

. J. , and MIZE and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur.

Jordan T. Isringhaus, J. Andrew Meyer , and Aaron M. Swift , of Finn Law Group, P.A. , St. Petersburg , for Appellant s
. Allison Morat , of Bitman, O’Brien & Morat, PLLC , Lake Mary , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
#### § 301-11.100 What will I be paid for lodging under Lodgings-plus per diem?

When travel is more than 12 hours and overnight lodging is required you are reimbursed your actual lodging cost not to exceed the maximum lodging rate for the TDY location or stopover point.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000356 06-FEB-2020 07:54 AM**NOT FOR**  **PUBLICATION IN**  **WEST'S HAW** **AI'I REPORTS**  **AND PACIFIC**  **REPORTER Therefore,**  **IT IS**  **HEREBY ORDERED**  **that the**  **stipulation to**  **dismiss the appeal is**  **approved, and**  **the appeal**  **is dismissed**  **with prejudice.**  **The parties**  **shall bear**  **their own**  **attorneys' fees**  **and costs.**  **DA T** **ED: Honolulu,**  **Hawai'i, F** **ebruary 6**  **, 2020**  **.**



## [}p.adld/L **Associate Judge** 

**2**
No. 11-9646.

#### Cortez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.2

                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                            ANGELICA CORPORATION
                MIRROR 401(k) AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

         Angelica Corporation established the Angelica Corporation Mirror
401(k) and Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), effective November 1,
2003, solely for the purpose of permitting certain of its salaried employees
who participate in the Angelica Corporation Retirement Savings Plan to
receive contributions equal to amounts in excess of the limitations on
contributions imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, on
defined contribution plans.

         The Sponsor now deems it in the best interest of Plan participants
to terminate the Plan, effective June 24, 2005, and to distribute all
benefits to employees on or before December 31, 2005 in accordance with the
transition guidance provided in Notice 2005-1 with respect to Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code.

         The Plan is amended, effective as of June 24, 2005, as follows:

         1. Article II is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         Effective June 24, 2005, the Plan is terminated and no additional
         Senior Management Employees will become eligible to participate in
         the Plan on or after that date.

         2. Section 3.1 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as
         follows:

            3.1. Supplemental Compensation Reduction Contributions.
                 -------------------------------------------------

         Effective June 24, 2005, the Plan is terminated and no additional
         deferrals may be made under the Plan on or after that date.

         3. Article V of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as
         follows:

         All amounts credited to a Participant's Supplemental Subaccounts A
         and B, including gains and losses credited in accordance with
         Article IV of the Plan, shall be distributed to or with respect to
         a Participant on or before December 31, 2005. Distribution of all
         amounts pursuant to this Article V will be deemed consideration
         received by the Participant in exchange for the termination of the
         Plan and cancellation of any Supplemental Compensation Reduction
         Agreements and will constitute a complete discharge of any
         liability of the Company and the Plan to the Participant under the
         Plan.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Angelica Corporation hereby adopts the
foregoing Amendment No. 1 the 1st day of September, 2005.

                                   ANGELICA CORPORATION


                                   By: /s/ Stephen M. O'Hara
                                      ---------------------------------------

                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                         ------------------------------------
Exposure Report

PMN Number: P-11-0230 

Assessor: Bevington/SS

Ratings

Non-Occupational: Environmental:

Drop Criteria: EAB Drop

Criteria Reasoning:

Exposure Based Assessment:

Exposure-Based (Non-Occupational): 

Exposure-Based (Environmental): 

Exposure Parameter Exposure-Based Persistent/Bioaccum Exposure Value

Surface DW:

 Fish Ingestion:

Ground DW:

Inhalation:

Water Releases:

Total Releases:

Consumer Exposure:

Recommended Fate Tests:

Consumer Use expected? 

Consumer Use remarks: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 2
Scenario Comment Sites Location

1. Scenario -- Medium: (Engineering) ; , 

 2. Release -- Medium: (Engineering) ; 

**Environmental Release Information for Those Releases Which Went to the Model (Release Identifier 

Number)

1

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 2
# Comments on: 22-2060: ASPEN CONSULTING, LLC v. SECRETARY OF THE ARMY [ORDER], Nonprecedential
#### § 60-4.8 Show cause notice.

If an investigation or compliance review reveals that a construction contractor or subcontractor has violated the Executive order, any contract clause, specifications or the regulations in this chapter and if administrative enforcement is contemplated, the Director shall issue to the contractor or subcontractor a notice to show cause which shall contain the items specified in paragraphs (i) through (iv) of 41 CFR 60-2.2(c)(1). If the contractor does not show good cause within 30 days, or in the alternative, fails to enter an acceptable conciliation agreement which includes where appropriate, make up goals and timetables, back pay, and seniority relief for affected class members, the OFCCP shall follow the procedure in 41 CFR 60-1.26(b): *Provided,* That where a conciliation agreement has been violated, no show cause notice is required prior to the initiation of enforcement proceedings.

[43 FR 49254, Oct. 20, 1978; 43 FR 51401, Nov. 3, 1978]