alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 301-54.2 What is disposable pay?

Disposable pay is your compensation remaining after the deduction from your earnings of any amounts required by law to be withheld. These deductions do not include discretionary deductions such as savings bonds, charitable contributions, etc. Deductions may be made from any type of pay you receive from your agency, e.g., basic pay, special pay, retirement pay, or incentive pay.

[FTR Amdt. 92, 65 FR 21366, Apr. 21, 2000]
MICHAEL W. KELLEY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT 3 940 MAIN STREET, SUITE 209 EL CENTRO, CA 92243 

# rJjoarb of**~uperbisors** 

## l!ountp of Jfmperial BLS: {760) 482-4220 BUS: \760) 482-4308 FAX: (?60) 482-4215 E-MAIL:**mkcllcy(a~co.imp(:ria!.c'i** us

May 7, 2014 Secretary Anthony Foxx U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Docket DOT-OST-2008-0299 Dear Secretary Foxx, ·····:.,
:' "
.. 1::.

I write to express my concerns with the Department ofTransportation's Tentative Order to terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) program in El Centro, Californialocated in Imperial County. I urge you to consider the negative economic impacts that may occur as a result ofthe proposed termination oftheprogram. The Imperial County Airport has a tremendous track record ofsurpassing the EAS program requirements put forth by the government, as they have dramatically exceededthe enplanement minimum in four ofthe last five fiscal years. Unfortunately, in FY 2013, the Imperial County Airport barely fell below the ten enplanement threshold, byreaching 9.5 enplanements for the first time. As youknow, the Essential Air Service was put into place to guarantee that small communities, including those within the Imperial County, continue to be served by certificated air carriers. Over the last several years, Imperial County has experienced the highest unemploymentrate in the nation. Our federal government should encourage economic growth, and consider all factors before terminating a much-needed program in the region. As you prepare the Final Order, I urge you to consider the Imperial Valley's track record over the last three fiscal years, and ask that you consider the void that will be left shouldthe Department ofTransportationultimately decide to terminate the much-needed Essential Air Service program currently ineffect at the Imperial County Airport. Thank you for your time and consideration ofmy request.
Sincerelv.

# ~ ,f}!RJ ,)

# ./..?~ Michael 

### w.

## ~~. . 

# K**e~q/** Imperial County Board ofSupervi#$

AN EQU \L OPPORTL NlTY I AFf'li\MATIVE ACTIO!\**J;~fi'LOYJ~:R** "·· ;·.

.**.···~** ..
#### § 115-1.104 Publication of FPMR.
April 29, 1998

Armco Inc.
One Oxford Centre
301 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Dear Sirs/Madams:

At your request, we have read the description included in your Quarterly 
Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the 
quarter ended March 31, 1998, of the facts relating to a change in Armco 
Inc.'s method of accounting for unrecognized net gains or losses related 
to pension and other postretirement benefit plans from the minimum 
amortization method as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting 
Standards Nos. 87 and 106, to a method whereby the Company will 
recognize immediately into income any unrecognized net gains or losses 
outside a 10% corridor and will amortize into income any unrecognized 
net gains or losses inside such corridor over the average expected 
remaining service period of active plan participants.  We believe, on 
the basis of the facts so set forth and other information furnished to 
us by officials of the Company, that the accounting change described in 
your Form 10-Q is to an alternative accounting principle that is 
preferable under the circumstances. 

We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of the Company 
and its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period 
subsequent to December 31, 1997.  Therefore, we are unable to express, 
and we do not express, an opinion on the facts set forth in the above-
mentioned Form 10-Q, on the related information furnished to us by 
officials of the Company, or on the financial position, results of 
operations, or cash flows of the Company and its consolidated 
subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 
1997.

Yours truly,


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED 
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           945,635
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      39,749
<MORTGAGE>                                      78,588
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      479
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,482,342
<CASH>                                          24,516
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              11,494
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         227,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,937,312
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                293,458
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             45,366
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  59,896
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,023,101
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 44,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          103,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,116
<OTHER-SE>                                     189,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,937,312
<PREMIUMS>                                      71,530
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             27,144
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 112
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     620
<BENEFITS>                                      44,057
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      9,058
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            30,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,961
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,287
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,674
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,674
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  58,484
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Order entered August 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00284-CV

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., ET AL., Appellants

V.

BENJAMIN THOMAS REAVIS, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-15296

ORDER

Before the Court is the August 13, 2019 second request of Vielica Dobbins, Official 

Court Reporter for the 134th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s 

record. We GRANT the request and extend the time to September 9, 2019. We caution Ms. 

Dobbins that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131491 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131491 

 COA: 258671 

Macomb CC: 2004-000594-FC 

DAVID NATHANIEL HOLLOWAY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 27, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
#### § 50-203.15 Initiation of proceeding.

Wage determination proceedings may be initiated by the Secretary of Labor with respect to any industry. The proceedings may be initiated by the Secretary of Labor upon his own motion or upon the request of any party showing a proper interest in the industry.
#### § 60-300.22 Direct threat defense.

The contractor may use as a qualification standard the requirement that an individual be able to perform the essential functions of the position held or desired without posing a direct threat to the health or safety of the individual or others in the workplace. (See § 60-300.2(g) defining *direct threat.*).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the next meeting of the Panel to Assess the Capabilities for Domestic Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction. Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. (Pub. L. 92-463).

# DATES:

July 17 and 18, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

RAND, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050.

# PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND AGENDA:

Panel to Assess the Capabilities for Domestic Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction will meet from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. on July 17, 2000, and from 9 a.m. until 2 p.m. on July 18, 2000. Time will be allocated for public comments by individuals or organizations.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

RAND provides information about this Panel on its web site at http://www.rand.org/​organization/​nsrd/​terrpanel; it can also be reached at (703) 413-1100 extension 5282. Public comment presentations will be limited to two minutes each and must be provided in writing prior to the meeting. Mail written presentations and requests to register to attend the open public session to: Priscilla Schlegel, RAND, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050. Public seating for this meeting is limited, and is available on a first-come first-served basis.

Dated: June 22, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-16260  Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5601-10-M
No. 10-11147.

#### Campbell *v.*McDaniel, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130395 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130395 

 COA: 256303 

Wayne CC: 03-014017-01 

HORACE WALLACE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 1, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0522 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2006 

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Part N, National Institutes of Health, of the Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority for the Department of Health and Human Services (40 FR 22859, May 27, 1975, as amended most recently of 65 FR 20477, April 17, 2000, and redesignated from Part HN as Part N at 60 FR 56606, November 9, 1995), is amended as set forth below to reflect the retitling of the Office of Bioengineering and Bioimaging in the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, as the Office of Bioengineering, Bioimaging, and Bioinformatics.

Section N-B, Organization and Functions, is amended as follows: Under the heading Office of Bioengineering, Bioimaging (NAC, formerly HNAC), replace the title with: Office of Bioengineering, Bioimaging, and Bioinformatics (NAC, formerly HNAC).

Dated: May 25, 2000.

Ruth Kirschstein,

Acting Director, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 00-15762  Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
28 January 2016

101P15-2

#### State v. Christopher Anthony Clegg

1. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Beal [sic] of Particulars and Probable Cause Indictment

1. Dismissed

2. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Clerk Discharge of Debtors

2. Dismissed
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

TQ DELTA, LLC,

Appellant

v.

DISH NETWORK LLC,

Appellee

______________________

2018-1798

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-

01469.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TQ DELTA, LLC,

Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellee

______________________

2018-1800

______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-

01760.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

DAVID Z. PETTY, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by PETER 

J. MCANDREWS, RAJENDRA A. CHIPLUNKAR. 

 HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued 

for appellee DISH Network LLC. Also represented by 

JENNIFER VOLK, Reston, VA; STEPHEN R. SMITH, Washington, DC. 

 THEODORE M. FOSTER, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, 

TX, argued for appellee Cisco Systems, Inc. Also represented by DAVID L. MCCOMBS, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 July 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofWyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2007 (the Report), I, Robert Essner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

 

Dated: May 9, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,251 and TA-W-37,703]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, investigations were initiated on January 18, 2000 and May 22, 2000, in response to a worker petitions which were filed on behalf of workers at Beloit Millpro Service Center, Hattiesburg, Mississippi (TA-W-37,251) and Beloit Manhattan, Neenah, Wisconsin (TA-W-37,703), respectively.

During the investigations, it was discovered that both facilities are under existing investigations. The workers are currently under the following investigations: Beloit Millpro Service Center, Hattiesburg, Mississippi (TA-W-37,562G) and Beloit Manhattan, Neenah, Wisconsin (TA-W-37,562J).

Consequently further investigations in these cases (TA-W-37,251 and TA-W-37,703) would serve no purpose, and the investigations have been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 15th day of June, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-16495  Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
§ 102-76.105 What standard must public rights-of-way subject to the Architectural Barriers Act and covered under § 102-76.65(a) meet? ( a ) GSA adopts the appendix to 36 CFR part 1190 without additions or modification as the accessibility standard for pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way. Pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way subject to the Architectural Barriers Act (other than facilities in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section) must meet the accessibility standard for pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way so that pedestrian facilities located in the public right-of-way are readily accessible to and usable by pedestrians with disabilities. Compliance with this accessibility standard is mandatory; provided, however, that this standard does not address existing pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way under the Architectural Barriers Act unless the pedestrian facilities are altered at the discretion of a covered entity.
( b ) Residential public rights-of-way subject to the Architectural Barriers Act must meet the standards prescribed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
( c ) Department of Defense and United States Postal Service public rights-of-way subject to the Architectural Barriers Act must meet the standards prescribed by those agencies.
#### § 301-10.161 When may I use sleeping accommodations aboard train service?

You may use the lowest class of sleeping accommodations aboard a train that meets your mission needs when overnight travel is required, and your agency determines it is advantageous to the Government.

[FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55705, Sept. 12, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16542]



[[Page 41049]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration

[00-C]


Designation for the East Indiana (IN) Area

AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration 
(GIPSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: GIPSA announces designation of East Indiana Grain Inspection, 
Inc. (East Indiana) to provide official services under the United 
States Grain Standards Act, as amended (Act), for a 1-year term, 
September 1, 2000, though August 31, 2001.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 1, 2000.

ADDRESSES: USDA, GIPSA, Janet M. Hart, Chief, Review Branch, Compliance 
Division, STOP 3604, Room 1647-S, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20250-3604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet M. Hart at 202-720-8525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action has been reviewed and determined 
not to be a rule or regulation as defined in Executive Order 12866 and 
Departmental Regulation 1512-1; therefore, the Executive Order and 
Departmental Regulation do not apply to this action.
    In the December 1, 1999, Federal Register (64 FR 67246), GIPSA 
asked persons interested in providing official services in the 
geographic area assigned to East Indiana to submit an application for 
designation. Applications were due by December 30, 1999. Since East 
Indiana was the sole applicant for designation to provide official 
services in the entire area currently assigned to them, GIPSA did not 
ask for comments on the applicant.
    GIPSA evaluated all available information regarding the designation 
criteria in section 7(f)(l)(A) of the Act and, according to section 
7(f)(l)(B), determined that East Indiana is able to provide official 
services in the geographic area, specified in the December 1, 1999, 
Federal Register, for which they applied. We are granting the 1-year 
designation to allow East Indiana time to complete the requirements for 
compliance with the national quality database. Interested persons may 
obtain official services by calling East Indiana at 765-289-1206.

    Authority: Pub. L. 94-582, 90 Stat. 2867, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
71 et seq.).

    Dated: June 14, 2000.
Neil E. Porter,
Director, Compliance Division.
[FR Doc. 00-16542 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-EN-P