alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-11169.

#### Rolle *v.*Scism, Warden.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### § 302-9.8 Must my agency authorize transportation or emergency or temporary storage of my POV?

No; however, if your agency does authorize transportation of a POV to your post of duty and you complete your service agreement, your agency must pay for the cost of returning the POV. Your agency determines the conditions under which it will pay for transportation and emergency or temporary storage and the procedures an employee must follow.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated and amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-06, 76 FR 71889, 71890, Nov. 21, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements at June 30, 1999 (unaudited) and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999

<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (79)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,160
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,051
<PP&E>                                           1,154
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (463)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,912
<SALES>                                          3,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,853
<CGS>                                            2,972
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   759
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     80
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 71
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        71
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 1, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00121

- CV

WESTOVER CONTINUING CARE CENTER LTD. CO.

d/b/a Windemere at Westover Hills; Cantex Health Care Centers III, LLC; and Cantex

Continuing Care Network, LLC f/k/a Cantex Senior Communities, LLC,

Appellants

v.

Suzanne Smith ADAMS , Independent Executor of the Estate of John Parker Smith, Deceased,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI11249

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, Appellee’s motion to dismiss is

GRANTED. This appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. Appellants’ request

for alternative relief is DENIED.

We tax costs of court for this appeal against Appellants Westover Continuing Care Center

Ltd. Co. d/b/a Windemere at Westover Hills; Cantex Health Care Centers III, LLC; and Cantex

Continuing Care Network, LLC f/k/a Cantex Senior Communities, LLC.

It is so ORDERED on De cember 1, 2021

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1st day of December, 2021

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**MOSSIMO, INC.**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Annual Report of Mossimo, Inc. (theCompany) on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I Mossimo Giannulli, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)            The Report, to which this certification is attached asExhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the Company.

 
| /s/ MOSSIMO GIANNULLI                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Mossimo Giannulli                      |
| *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer* |
| April 28, 2006                    |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THECOMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF UPON REQUEST.

 

THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-K TO WHICH ITRELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND ISNOT TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO A FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THESECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 (WHETHER MADE BEFORE ORAFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-K), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERALINCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING.

 

----
No. 11-5023.

#### Biggs *v.*Missouri.

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 13****Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**In connection with the Annual Report of National Grid plc (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for theperiod ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350that, to his knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     June 20, 2006 **/s/  Roger Urwin**      Roger Urwin    Group Chief Executive       June 20, 2006 **/s/  Steve Lucas**      Steve Lucas    Group Finance Director
§ 51-6.4 Military resale commodities. ( a ) Purchase procedures for ordering military resale commodities are available from the central nonprofit agencies. Authorized resale outlets (military commissary stores, Armed Forces exchanges and like activities of other Government departments and agencies) shall request the central nonprofit agency responsible for the military resale commodity being ordered to designate the nonprofit agency or its agent to which the outlets shall forward orders.
( b ) Authorized resale outlets shall stock military resale commodities in as broad a range as practicable. Authorized resale outlets may stock commercial items comparable to military resale commodities they stock, except that military commissary stores shall stock military resale commodities in the 300-800-, 900-, 1000-, 1100-, 10000- (10000-10999); 13000 (13000-13999); 14000 (14000-14999); 15000 (15000-15999); and 16000 (16000-16999) series exclusively, unless an exception has been granted on an individual store basis for the stocking of comparable commercial items for which there is a significant customer demand.
( c ) The Defense Commissary Agency shall, after consultation with the Committee: ( 1 ) Establish mandatory lists of military resale commodities to be stocked in commissary stores.
( 2 ) Require the stocking in commissary stores of military resale commodities in the 0- (0-99), 200-, 300-, 400-, 500-, 600-, 700-, 800-, 900-, 1000-, 1100-, 1200- (1200-9999), 10000- (10000-10999), 11000 (11000-11999); 12000 (12000-12999); 13000 (13000-13999); 14000 (14000-14999); 15000 (15000-15999); and 16000 (16000-16999) series in as broad a range as is practicable.
( 3 ) Issue guidance requiring commissary store personnel to maximize sales potential of military resale commodities.
( 4 ) Establish policies and procedures which reserve to its agency headquarters the authority to grant exceptions to the exclusive stocking of 300-, 800-, 900-, 1000-, 1100-, 10000- (10000-10999); 13000 (13000-13999); 14000 (14000-14999); 15000 (15000-15999); and 16000 (16000-16999) series military resale commodities.
( d ) The Defense Commissary Agency shall provide the Committee a copy of each directive which relates to the stocking of military resale commodities in commissary stores, including exceptions authorizing the stocking of commercial items in competition with 300-, 800-, 900-, 1000-, 1100-, 10000- (10000-10999); 13000 (13000-13999); 14000 (14000-14999); 15000 (15000-15999); and 16000 (16000-16999) series military resale commodities.
( e ) The prices of military resale commodities include delivery to destination or, in the case of destinations overseas, to designated depots at ports of embarkation. Zone pricing is used for delivery to Alaska and Hawaii.
[56 FR 48983, Sept. 26, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 59343, Nov. 16, 1994; 62 FR 32237, June 13, 1997; 71 FR 67312, Nov. 21, 2006; 80 FR 32039, June 5, 2015; 80 FR 35848, June 23, 2015]
#### § 51-3.5 Fees.

A central nonprofit agency may charge fees to nonprofit agencies for facilitating their participation in the AbilityOne Program. Fees shall be calculated based on nonprofit agency sales to the Government under the AbilityOne Program. Fees shall not exceed the fee limit approved by the Committee.

[56 FR 48979, Sept. 26, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 68494, Nov. 27, 2006]
----

**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                May 10, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Jeffrey P. Baker    |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Jeffrey                P. Baker        |
|                               |   | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                               |   |                                   |
| Dated:                May 10, 2006 | By:    | /s/                David J. Steichen   |
|                               |   | David                J. Steichen       |
|                               |   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
#### § 0.285 Record of actions taken.

The history card, the station file, and other appropriate files are designated to be the official records of action taken by the Chief of the Media Bureau. The official records of action are maintained by the Reference Information Center.

[88 FR 21430, Apr. 10, 2023]
From: M Roller

To: Finamore, Robert (OST)

Cc: Christofano, David (OST); Robert A. Wirick

Subject: Re: Request for prompt DOT approval of Jetconnect Application for Exemption and Statement of Authorization;

DOT-OST-2014-0135

Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 2:46:57 PM

Importance: High

Thanks for the call, Bob. The wording in question should read --

in order to display the AA* code of American Airlines on flights operated by

Jetconnect between points in New Zealand; between points in Australia; and

between any point or points in New Zealand, via intermediate points, and any

point or points in Australia New Zealand; for the purpose of transporting

codeshare traffic of American Airlines on U.S.-Australia and/or U.S.-New

Zealand flights operated by Qantas Airways or other carrier authorized to

display the AA* code on those routes.

Hopefully this works. Sorry for the error.

Let me know if you have other questions. We look forward to receipt of the approval.

Moffett

Moffett Roller

Roller & Bauer, PLLC

Work: 202-331-3300

Fax: 202-331-3322

Mobile: 703-855-2227
No. 11-5.

#### Lynn *v.*Tarney et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 102-74.540 What are the items for which permittees must reimburse Federal agencies?

Permittees must reimburse Federal agencies for services over and above those normally provided during normal business hours. Federal agencies may provide the services free of charge if the cost is insignificant and if it is in the public interest.
§ 51-8.8 Administrative Appeals. ( a ) *Requirements for making an appeal.* A requester may appeal any adverse determinations to the Committee's Chief FOIA Officer. The contact information for the FOIA Officer is available at the Committee's website, at *https://www.abilityone.gov/laws,_regulations_and_policy/foia.html*. Appeals can be submitted through email or the web portal accessible on the FOIA web page. Examples of adverse determinations are provided in § 51-8.6(d). The requester must make the appeal in writing and to be considered timely it must be postmarked, or in the case of electronic submissions, transmitted, within 90 calendar days after the date of the response. The appeal should clearly identify the Committee's determination that is being appealed and the assigned request number. To facilitate handling, the requester should mark both the appeal letter and envelope, or subject line of the electronic transmission, “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.”
( b ) *Adjudication of appeals.* ( 1 ) The Committee Executive Director or designee will act on behalf of the Committee on all appeals under this section.
( 2 ) An appeal ordinarily will not be adjudicated if the request becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
( 3 ) On receipt of any appeal involving classified information, the Committee's Chief FOIA Officer shall take appropriate action to ensure compliance with
( c ) *Decisions on appeals.* A decision on an appeal must be made in writing. A decision that upholds a Committee determination will contain a statement that identifies the reasons for the affirmance, including any FOIA exemptions applied. The decision will provide the requester with notification of the statutory right to file a lawsuit and will inform the requester of the mediation services offered by the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) of the National Archives and Records Administration as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. If a Committee's decision is remanded or modified on appeal, the requester will be notified of that determination in writing. The Committee will thereafter further process the request in accordance with that appeal determination and respond directly to the requester.
( d ) *Engaging in dispute resolution services provided by OGIS.* Mediation is a voluntary process. If the Committee agrees to participate in the mediation services provided by the Office of Government Information Services, it will actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt to resolve the dispute.
( e ) *When appeal is required.* Before seeking review by a court of a Committee's adverse determination, a requester generally must first submit a timely administrative appeal.
EXHIBIT 99



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BTC IV Assignor Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Director, Principal and Principal Executive Officer of C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.



|                | BCTC IV Assignor Corp.
|--------------- | ----------------------
|                |                       
|                |                       
|Date:           |                       
|August 25, 2003 | By:                   
|                |                       
|                |                       
|                |                       
|                |                       
|                |
# Comments on: 19-1676: HARRIS v. SEC [OPINION], Precedential
FORM 33. Response to Notice of Oral Argument Form 33 

March 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT

Case Number:

Short Case Caption:

Filing Party:

Instructions. No more than two counsel may argue per side, and no more than one counsel 

may argue on behalf of each party or on behalf of parties represented by the same counsel or 

by counsel from the same firm. Fed. Cir. R. 34(e)(2). Each arguing counsel must complete 

and submit a separate Form 33, but counsel arguing on behalf of parties represented by other 

counsel should only submit one Form 33 and list all parties below. Parties represented by 

distinct counsel may elect to have one counsel represent their collective interests at 

argument, and no amended entry of appearance is required.

Parties intending to waive argument should check the waiver box below; parties not waiving

argument should complete the remainder of the form. Argument time must be identified in 

whole minutes. Rebuttal time is only allowed for Appellants and Cross-Appellants. Unless 

otherwise ordered, cases must not exceed 15 minutes per side, including any rebuttal time.

Oral Argument Waiver ☐ The above party intends to waive oral argument.

Accommodation Need ☐ Arguing counsel requires an accommodation.

Arguing Counsel Name

(Include Mr., Ms., Dr., etc.)

Parties I am representing at 

argument (if different from 

filing parties; attach additional 

page if needed)

Phone: Main Argument Mins.: Rebuttal Mins.:

☐ I am dividing time with another counsel (counsel must file separate Responses).

I acknowledge that (1) oral argument is scheduled as stated in the court’s notice and may 

proceed even if I waive argument, see Fed. R. App. P. 34(e)–(f); (2) arguing counsel can only 

change through filing an amended version of this form; and (3) counsel who have not entered 

appearances in the case and are not listed on this form cannot present oral argument.

Date: _________________ Signature:

Name:
### Part I, **Section B, Item 2(e) Chemical Structure Diagram TS**  **- C50**  **79 P**  **Page 5a**
042P04-7

#### State v. Larry McLeod Pulley

Def's *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Habeas Corpus*

Denied 04/15/2016
1845 - 0052

– Affected Public

– Private Institutions 11 /26 /201 4

This request is for approval of an extension of OMB information collection number 1845 - 0052 the reporting requirements currently in the Student Assistance General Provisions, 34 CFR 668, Subpart I. This subpart governs the Immigration - Status Confirmation, as authorized by section 484(g) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C. 1091). The regulations can be reviewed at 34 CFR 668, Subpart I . There is an increase in burden hours due to an increase in the number of respondents who need to present documentation to the school to be included with the G - 845 form to complete the confirmation of eligibility t o receive Title IV assistance. There has not been any change to the regulatory language requiring this activity.

# of Respondents # of Responses X Hours/ = Burden Response Hours Not - for -profit institution:

1,811 25,848 .17 hours = 4,394 (10 min.)
§ 303-70.600 When an employee dies while performing official travel duties directly supporting or directly relating to a contingency operation or an operation in response to an emergency declared by the President, must we provide transportation for the employee's immediate family, baggage, and household goods from the current official station to the former actual residence or an alternate destination? Yes. However, the employee must have died as a result of disease or injury incurred while performing official duties: ( a ) In an overseas location where the employee was performing such official duties;
( b ) Within the area of responsibility of the Commander of the United States Central Command; and
( c ) In direct support of or directly related to a military operation, including a contingency operation (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101(a)(13)) or an operation in response to an emergency declared by the President.
# Comments on: 22-1988: DELGADO v. DOJ [OPINION], Nonprecedential