alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             124
<SECURITIES>                                       900
<RECEIVABLES>                                      821
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                         77
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,025
<PP&E>                                           2,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,939
<BONDS>                                            320
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,307
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,555)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (3,049)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,028
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (604)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (604)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.60)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and is available for licensing by the Department of the Navy. 

U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/573,152 entitled, “Decontamination Solution and Method”, filing date: May 19, 2000, Navy Case No. 82505. 

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for copies of the patent applications cited should be directed to the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Laboratory, Code CD222, 17320 Dahlgren Road, Building 183, Room 015, Dahlgren, VA 22448-5100, and must include the Navy Case number. Interested parties will be required to sign a Confidentiality, Non-Disclosure and Non-Use Agreement before receiving copies of requested patent applications. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James B. Bechtel, Patent Counsel, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Laboratory, Code CD222, 17320 Dahlgren Road, Building 183, Room 015, Dahlgren, VA 22448-5100, telephone (540) 653-8016. 

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404. 

Dated: June 14, 2000. 

J.L. Roth, 

                            Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy,                             *Federal Register*                             Liaison Officer.                         

[FR Doc. 00-16216 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
I want to... When can I do this? How can I do this? 

Enroll or increase 

coverage 

• First 60 days as a new or newly 

eligible employee; or 

• Within 60 days after a life event 

(marriage, divorce, death of spouse

acquire an eligible child); or 

• Life insurance Open Season (not 

annual - infrequent); or 

• When you pass a physical exam

(Option C excluded) 

, 

• Use your agency’s electronic 

enrollment system; or 

• Go to 

opm.gov/forms/standard-forms 

• Submit form SF 2817 to your human 

resources office 

• Bring a blank form SF 2822 to your 

human resources office (physical 

exam applications only) 

Cancel or reduce 

coverage Anytime 

Use your agency’s electronic enrollment 

system or submit form SF 2817 to your 

HR office 

Designate a (new) beneficiary Anytime Submit form SF 2823 to your HR office 

The Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance Program (FEGLI) 

LIFE INSURANCE 

FEGLI can help you protect your loved ones from burdensome funeral costs and catastrophic loss of your 

income if you die unexpectedly. 

BASIC 

Amount of Coverage: Your annual salary rounded up to the next even $1,000, plus $2,000 

Who is Covered?: You 

Cost each biweekly pay period: 15¢ per $1,000 of coverage (Free for postal employees) 

Cost increases with age?: No 

Newly eligible employees automatically enrolled?: Yes, unless you waive coverage 

OPTION 

A 

Amount of Coverage: $10,000 

Who is Covered?: You 

Cost each biweekly pay period: Starting at 20¢ 

Cost increases with age?: Yes 

Newly eligible employees automatically enrolled?: No, you must elect this coverage 

Amount of Coverage: 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 multiples of your salary rounded up to the next even $1,000 

Who is Covered?: You 

Cost each biweekly pay period: Starting at 2¢ per $1,000 of coverage 

Cost increases with age?: Yes 

Newly eligible employees automatically enrolled?: No, you must elect this coverage 

Amount of Coverage: 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 multiples. Each multiple equals $5,000 for the life of your 

 spouse and $2,500 for the life of each eligible child 

Who is Covered?: Your spouse and unmarried dependent children under age 22 

Cost each biweekly pay period: Starting at 22¢ per multiple 

Cost increases with age?: Yes 

Newly eligible employees automatically enrolled?: No, you must elect this coverage 

OPTION 

B 

OPTION 

C 

MORE INFO: www.opm.gov/life 

For complete information, including terms and conditions, please visit www.opm.gov/life. 

U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
§ 51-9.402 Review of requests to amend records. ( a ) Upon receipt of a request to amend a record, the responsible official, whenever practicable shall complete the review and advise the individual of the results within ten working days. If a determination cannot be made within ten working days, the Executive Director, within ten working days, shall send the individual a written acknowledgment of receipt of the request including a description of the request and the date when the requester may except to be advised of action taken on the request. Except in unusual circumstances, the Executive Director shall complete the review within 30 working days. In unusual circumstances, causing delay beyond the 30 day limit, the Executive Director shall inform the individual in writing of the cause of delay, the actions taken to review the record, and the date the Executive Director anticipates the review to be complete.
( b ) When reviewing a record in response to a request to amend, the Executive Director shall assess the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness of the record to ensure fairness to the individual in any determination made on the basis of the record. With respect to a request to delete information, the Executive Director also shall review the request and record to determine whether the information is relevant and necessary to accomplish an agency purpose required to be accomplished by law or Executive Order.
139PA13

#### State v. Quintel Augustin, Tilmon Golphin, and Christina Walters (DEATH)

1. Defs’ Motion for Temporary Stay of the Mandate

1. Denied 01/07/2016

2. Defs’ Motion for Clarification

2. Denied 01/07/2016

3. Defs’ Motion for Leave to File Reply to Response to Clarification

3. Allowed 01/07/2016

Beasley, J.,

recused

Ervin, J.,

recused
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.3004 Public disclosure and reporting requirements. ( a ) *Public disclosure of gifts accepted from prohibited sources.* The Commission's Security Operations Office, Office of the Managing Director, shall maintain a written record of gifts accepted from prohibited sources by the Commission pursuant to section 4(g)(3) authority, which will include: ( 1 ) The identity of the prohibited source;
( 2 ) A description of the gift;
( 3 ) The market value of the gift;
( 4 ) Documentation concerning the prohibited source's reason for the gift as required in § 1.3003(f);
( 5 ) A signed statement of verification from the prohibited source that the gift is unconditional and is not contingent on any promise or expectation that the Commission's receipt of the gift will benefit the proposed donor in any regulatory matter; and
( 6 ) The date the gift is accepted by the Commission.
( b ) *Reporting Requirements for all gifts.* The Commission shall file a semi-annual report to Congress listing the gift, donor and value of all gifts accepted from any donor under this subpart.
No. 11-8993.

#### Kinard *v.*Booker, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Shannon Brooks, Appellant

No. 06-24-00031-CV v.

Centre Station Apartments, LLC, Appellee

Appeal from the 17th District Court of 

Tarrant County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 017-

332082-22). Panel consists of Chief Justice 

Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Stevens. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the agreed motion of the parties 

to dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Shannon Brooks, has adequately indicated her inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 7, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
## New Hampshire Regional Haze SIP Revision January 14, 2011 Contents:

• 

### NH Regional Haze SIP Cover Letter 01-14-11.pdf • 

### NH Regional Haze SIP 01-14-11.pdf Attachment I – Comments from Federal Land Managers and EPA (with Responses) • 

### EPA Letter 02-25-10.pdf • 

### Response to EPA Comments 03-10-10.pdf • 

### Env-A 2300 EPA Comments 11-22-10.pdf • 

### Response to EPA Comments 12-09-10.pdf • 

### NH Regional Haze SIP EPA Comments 12-20-10.pdf • 

### Response to EPA Comments 01-14-11.pdf • 

### NH Regional Haze SIP DOI-NPS Comments 12-20-10.pdf • 

### Response to FLMs Comments 01-14-11.pdf Attachment J – Comments from Other Stakeholders • 

### Env-A 2300 PSNH Comments 04-22-10.pdf • 

### Env-A 2300 Sierra Club Comments 11-22-10.pdf • 

### Response to Sierra Club Comments 01-14-11.pdf Attachment X – BART Analyses for Sources in New Ham pshire • 

### NH BART Analyses 01-14-11.pdf Attachment EE – Temporary Permit for PSNH Merrimack S tation • 

### PSNH MK Temp Permit (reissued) 08-02-10.pdf Attachment GG – Chapter Env-A 2300, Mitigation of Re gional Haze • 

### Env-A 2300 Evidence of Rule Adoption.pdf Attachment HH – Title V Operating Permit for PSNH M errimack Station (Proposed) • 

### PSNH MK Title V Permit (Proposed) 03-15-10.pdf Attachment II – Title V Operating Permit for PSNH N ewington Station • 

### PSNH NT Title V Permit (Final).pdf Attachment JJ – Public Notices for SIP Revision • 

### Public Notice 11-19-10.pdf Attachment KK – Certification of Public Process • 

### Certification of Public Process 01-11-11.pdf Attachment LL – Evidence of Legal Authority • 

### Evidence of Legal Authority.pdf Note: Attachments and portions of attachments prev iously submitted are not included in this package.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Daou Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Roberts, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ John A. Roberts                                                   |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|John A. Roberts
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
August 12, 2005 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
3614 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

Service may be used on international

registered mail.

* * * * *

385 Recorded Delivery

* * * * *

385.4 Processing Requests

(Amend heading and text of 385.41 to

read as follows:)

385.41 General Use

PS Form 8099, Receipt for Recorded

Delivery, is used for recorded delivery.

Only labels printed by the Postal

Service may be used on recorded

delivery mail.

* * * * *

Stanley F. Mires,

Chief Counsel, Legislative.

[FR Doc. 00–1570 Filed 1–21–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 25

[IB Docket No. 96–111; FCC 99–325]

Common Carrier Services: Satellite

Communications—Earth Stations

Operating with Non-U.S. Licensed

Space Stations; Application

Requirements

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of

effective date.

SUMMARY: This document announces the

effective date of rules published in the

Federal Register on November 15, 1999.

They related to application

requirements for earth stations

communicating with non-U.S. licensed

space stations.

EFFECTIVE DATES: The amendments to 47

CFR 25.137 published at 64 FR 61791

became effective on December 22, 1999.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steven Spaeth, International Bureau,

(202) 418–1539.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

1. On October 29, 1999, the

Commission released a First Order on

Reconsideration, a summary of which

was published in the Federal Register.

See 64 FR 61791, November 15, 1999.

The First Order on Reconsideration

streamlined the process established in

the Commission’s 1997 DISCO II Order,

by which non-U.S. licensed fixedsatellites providing service in the

conventional C-and Ku-bands may serve

the U.S. market. Because the

amendments to 47 CFR 25.137 imposed

modified information collection

requirements, the amendments could

not become effective until approved by

the Office of Management and Budget

(‘‘OMB’’), and no sooner than December

15, 1999. OMB approved these

amendments on December 22, 1999.

2. The Federal Register summary

stated that the Commission would

publish a document announcing the

effective date of the rule changes

requiring OMB approval. The

amendments to 47 CFR 25.137 became

effective on December 22, 1999. This

publication satisfies the statement that

the Commission would publish a

document announcing the effective date

of the rule changes requiring OMB

approval.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 25

Satellites.

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–1619 Filed 1–21–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
               EXTRACTED FROM THE ARMCO INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
               SHEETS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND 
               ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
               REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
<CIK>          0000007383
<NAME>         ARMCO INC.
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
<CURRENCY>     U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                            126,600
<SECURITIES>                       10,000
<RECEIVABLES>                     183,300
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       283,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  614,400
<PP&E>                          1,309,900
<DEPRECIATION>                    669,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,841,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             338,900
<BONDS>                           305,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                       185,900
<COMMON>                            1,100
<OTHER-SE>                        (84,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,841,900
<SALES>                           447,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  447,700
<CGS>                             404,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     404,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  7,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    22,100
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                20,300
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                         237,500
<NET-INCOME>                      257,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        2.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                        2.04
        

</TABLE>
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 5, 2015

No. 04-15-00675-CR

Baron Jeffrey HUNT,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR4234

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea 

bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately 

reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 

25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record 

under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal will be 

dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant 

causes an amended trial court certification to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of 

this order showing appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also 

Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 2003, order). All other appellate 

deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification issue.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of November, 2015.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 105-62.102 Authority to originally classify. ( a ) *Top secret, secret, and confidential.* The authority to originally classify information as Top Secret, Secret, or Confidential may be exercised only by the Administrator and is delegable only to the Director, Information Security Oversight Office.
( b ) *Limitations on delegation of classification authority.* Delegations of original classification authority are limited to the minimum number absolutely required for efficient administration. Delegated original classification authority may not be redelegated.
[47 FR 5416, Feb. 5, 1982]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50217

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LORENZO MIRANDA-RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-01-CR-1403-1-EP

--------------------

August 22, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lorenzo Miranda-Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. MirandaRamirez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the

aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased

sentence is an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)

that should have been alleged in his indictment. Miranda-Ramirez

maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged
No. 02-50217

-2-

only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his

sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which

may be imposed for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Miranda-Ramirez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court

must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court

itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.