alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated financial statements for period ended July
26, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUL-26-1997
<CASH>                                                      1,180
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              70,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                               (3,532)
<INVENTORY>                                               162,587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          236,370
<PP&E>                                                    246,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                           (119,798)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            401,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      98,604
<BONDS>                                                    98,136
<COMMON>                                                    9,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                179,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              401,905
<SALES>                                                   112,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          256,577
<CGS>                                                      75,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             192,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           53,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              822
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          5,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             5,284
<INCOME-TAX>                                                2,008
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                3,276
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 .36
        

</TABLE>
#### § 301-71.307 How do we collect the amount of a travel advance in excess of the amount of travel expenses substantiated by the employee?

When the outstanding advance exceeds what you owe the employee, then the employee must submit cash or a check for the difference in accordance with your policy. Your failure to collect the amount in excess of substantiated expenses will cause a violation of the accountable plan rules contained in the Internal Revenue Code (title 26 of the United States Code).

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15974, Apr. 1, 1998. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 108, 67 FR 57967, Sept. 13, 2002]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-350-000]


Williston Basis Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Request 
for Waiver

June 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 8, 2000, Williston Basis Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing a request for 
waiver of the provisions of the electronic data interchange (EDI) 
processing requirements related to the Gas Industry Standards Board 
(GISB) Verion 1.4 standards, except those Capacity Release standards 
which are necessary to conduct data retrieval transactions.
    Williston Basin states that it requests waiver of the following 
GISB Version 1.4 standards; Nominations standards 1.4.1 through 1.4.7; 
Flowing Gas standards 2.4.1 through 2.4.6; Invoicing standards 3.4.1 
through 3.4.4; and Capacity Release standards 5.4.4, 5.4.6 through 
5.4.12, and 5.4.18 through 5.4.19. In the alternative, Williston Basin 
states that it respectfully requests that the Commission grant the 
Company an extension of time to implement the GISB Version 1.4 EDI 
processing requirements until such time that a Part 284 customer, which 
pays for service on Williston Basin's system, requests that the Company 
offer such EDI transactions and fully executes a Trading Partner 
Agreement with Williston Basin.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before June 28, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the procedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must gile a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16136 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 12-30980 Summary Calendar JAMES CURTIS SUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DEPUTY CEDRIC D. PAYNE; CLENT RAMBIN, Defendants-Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:11-CV-1605 Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### AFFIRMED. See Rule 47.6. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D Februa ry 20 , 20 13 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion s houldnot * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### Case: 12-30980 Document: 00512149538 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2013
Filed 5/29/15 P. v. Slaughter CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JOSEPH F. SLAUGHTER,

Defendant and Appellant.

 D067246

 (Super. Ct. No. SCD242917)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Eugenia A. 

Eyherabide, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded. 

Robert H. Rexrode, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney 

General, Julie L. Garland, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Lynne G. McGinnis and 

Eric A. Swenson, Deputy Attorneys General for Plaintiff and Respondent.
2

In August 2012, Joseph F. Slaughter possessed cocaine base for sale. In 

September, he entered a negotiated guilty plea to possessing cocaine base for sale (Health 

& Saf. Code, § 11351.5).1 In October, the court stayed imposition of sentence and 

placed Slaughter on three years' probation. In 2013, the court revoked and reinstated 

probation. In October 2014, the court revoked probation and sentenced Slaughter to local 

custody for "the low term of three years." Slaughter appeals, contending he should be 

resentenced under the 2014 amendment to section 11351.5, effective January 1, 2015,

which replaced the previous lower, middle and upper terms of three, four or five years

with terms of two, three, or four years. (§ 11351.5, Stats. 2014, ch. 749, § 3, eff. Jan. 1, 

2015.) Respondent correctly concedes the point. 

The Legislature's intent in amending section 11351.5 was to rectify the injustice of 

punishing crimes involving cocaine base (crack cocaine) more harshly than crimes 

involving powder cocaine (cocaine hydrochloride). (Stats. 2014, ch. 749, § 2.) The 

amendment reduces the punishment for violating section 11351.5; we presume, in the 

absence of any contrary indication, that the Legislature intended the amendment to apply 

to all defendants whose convictions are not yet final. Thus, Slaughter is entitled to be 

resentenced under the more lenient sentencing scheme of the amended version of section 

11351.5. (People v. Keith (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 983, 985-986, citing In re Estrada

(1965) 63 Cal.2d 740, 745; People v. Hajek and Vo (2014) 58 Cal.4th 1144, 1195-1196;

People v. Nasalga (1996) 12 Cal.4th 784, 787, 789-798.) 

 

1 Further statutory references are to the Health and Safety Code.
3

DISPOSITION

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. The sentence is reversed and the case is 

remanded for resentencing under the amended version of section 11351.5 

AARON, J.

WE CONCUR:

BENKE, Acting P. J.

IRION, J.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF AIRPLANES GROUP AT MARCH 31, 2004


SUBSIDIARIES OF AIRPLANES LIMITED

Airplanes Bermuda Limited (Bermuda)
Airplanes Bermuda No 2 Limited (Bermuda)
Airplanes Finance Limited (Ireland)
Airplanes Funding 1 Limited (Ireland)
Airplanes Holdings Limited (Ireland)
Airplanes Jetprop Finance Limited (Ireland)
Airplanes IAL Limited (Ireland)
Airplanes IAL Finance Limited (Ireland)
Airplanes Leasing GmbH (Austria)
Airplanes R Finance Limited (Ireland)
Airplanes III Limited  (Ireland)
Airplanes 100 Finance Limited (Ireland)
Airplanes 320 Funding Limited (Ireland)
Airplanes 320 Limited (Ireland)
Asset Leasing N.V. (Belgium)
Asset Management 2 A/S (Norway)
Castle Management A/S (Norway)
Elasis Leasing S.A.R.L. (France)
Elasis Leasing IV Limited (United Kingdom)
Emerald Aviation Investments Limited (Ireland)
Fideck S.A.R.L. (France)
Leverage Leasing S.A.R.L. (France)

SUBSIDIARIES OF AIRPLANES U.S. TRUST

AeroUSA, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.)
AeroUSA 3, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.)
V

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5481

For the relief of Sarabeth M. Davis, Robert S. Borders, Victor Maron,

Irving Berke, and Adele E. Conrad.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 17, 2000

Mr. COX introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Sarabeth M. Davis, Robert S. Borders,

Victor Maron, Irving Berke, and Adele E. Conrad.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY

4 STUDY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury

6 shall pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise

7 appropriated, $lllllll jointly to the persons

8 named in subsection (b) for damages sustained by such

9 persons in connection with the air installation compatible

10 use zone study conducted by the Secretary of the Army
2

•HR 5481 IH

1 with respect to Los Alamitos Army Airfield under part

2 256 of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations.

3 (b) PERSONS TO RECEIVE COMPENSATION.—The

4 Secretary of the Treasury shall compensate the following

5 persons under subsection (a):

6 (1) Sarabeth M. Davis of Clinton, Washington.

7 (2) Robert S. Borders of Newport Beach, Cali8 fornia.

9 (3) Victor Maron of Long Beach, California.

10 (4) Irving Berke of Long Beach, California.

11 (5) Adele E. Conrad of Cypress, California.

12 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED

13 STATES.

14 Payment under section 1 shall constitute full settle15 ment of all legal and equitable claims by the persons re16 ferred to in section 1(b) against the United States for the

17 damages described in section 1(a).

18 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY AND AGENT FEES.

19 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not more than 10 percent of the

20 payment made under section 1 may be paid to or received

21 by an agent or attorney as consideration for a service ren22 dered in connection with this Act.

23 (b) ENFORCEABILITY OF CONTRACT.—Each contract

24 that violates subsection (a) shall be unenforceable.
3

•HR 5481 IH

1 (c) CRIMINAL PENALTY.—Each violation of sub2 section (a) shall be a misdemeanor punishable by a fine

3 of not more than $1,000.

Æ
#### § 302-7.6 What are the authorized origin and destination points for the transportation of HHG and PBP&E?

The authorized origin and destination points for the transportation of HHG and PBP&E vary by category of employee and are listed in the following table:

| Category of employee | Authorized origin/destination |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Employee transferred between official stations | Between the old and new official stations (including to/from extended storage location when authorized). |
| (b) New appointee | From place of actual residence to new official station (including to location of extended storage when authorized). |
| (c) Employee returning from outside CONUS assignment for separation from Government service | Last official station and extended storage location, when authorized, to place of actual residence. |
| (d) Employee authorized separation travel at Government expense to actual residence but retiring at the OCONUS official station or an alternate location | From any location, including actual residence and extended storage location to any other location (including the OCONUS official station), not to exceed the constructive transportation cost from the official station and extended storage location (respectively) to the actual residence. |
| (e) SES last move home benefits | From the last official station and extended storage location, when authorized, to the place of selection. |
| (f) Temporary change of official station (TCS) | From the current official station to the TCS location and return (includes to and from extended storage location when authorized). |

Transportation of HHG and PBP&E

[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18339, Apr. 1, 2011]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7075

CHANTOMMIE MCBRIDE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STEVE JONES, Sergeant, Anderson County Sheriff’s Office; BANNISTER, Anderson County Sheriff’s Office; C. J. FULLER, Iver Police Department; COLENNA LYNN HAMBY; HARVEY SAMUEL GARLAND; RALF ALLEN GESELL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-02-816-9-23) Submitted: October 23, 2002 Decided: November 20, 2002 Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chantommie McBride, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Chantommie McBride appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 680

To reduce the number of executive branch political appointees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. LUTHER (for himself, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. HALL of

Texas, Mr. ENGLISH, and Mr. MINGE) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To reduce the number of executive branch political

appointees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF POLITICAL AP4 POINTEES.

5 (a) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

6 term ‘‘political appointee’’ means any individual who—

7 (1) is employed in a position listed in sections

8 5312 through 5316 of title 5, United States Code

9 (relating to the Executive Schedule);
2

HR 680 IH

1 (2) is a limited term appointee, limited emer2 gency appointee, or noncareer appointee in the Sen3 ior Executive Service, as defined under section

4 3132(a) (5), (6), and (7) of title 5, United States

5 Code, respectively; or

6 (3) is employed in a position in the executive

7 branch of the Government under schedule C of sub8 part C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal

9 Regulations.

10 (b) LIMITATION.—The President, acting through the

11 Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Per12 sonnel Management, shall take such actions as necessary

13 (including reduction-in-force actions under applicable pro14 cedures) to ensure that the number of political appointees

15 shall not, during any fiscal year beginning after September

16 30, 2000, exceed a total of 2,000 (determined on a full17 time equivalent basis).

Æ
### Local Rule Notice ofand Assignment ofRelated Case in Appeals



### As required by the Local Rules Relating to Assignment ofRelated Cases to and Transfers of Related Cases between the First and Fourteenth Courts of Appeals, I certify that the following related appeal or original proceeding has been previously filed in either the First or Fourteenth Court ofAppeals: 

# D None 

# k8J Caption:

Trial court case number: Appellate court case number: Terry Nefl Derivativelv on Behalf ofWeatherford International Ltd. vs. Nicholas Bradv. David J. 

### Butters. William E. Macaulay. Robert B. Millard. Robert K. Moses. Jr

.. RobertA. Rayne. BernardJ. 

### Duroc-Danner and Bruce M. Martin



### Cause No. 2010-40764

01-15-00544-CV

ttorney or pro se party]

[Date]

Note: 

### See Local Rules for the definitions of "underlying case," "related," and "previously filed."Certificate of Service

As required byTexas Rule ofAppellate Procedure 6.3 and 9.5(b), (d), ( e), I certifythat I have served this document on all other parties which are listed below on June 19, 2015, as follows:
James A. Reeder, Jr. Jeffrey S. Johnston Stacy M. Neal Nicholas Shum Stephanie Miller VINSON & ELKINS LLP 1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2500 Houston, TX 77002 jreeder@velaw.com jjohnston@velaw.com sneal@velaw.com nshum@velaw.com smiller@velaw.com Attorneys for Defendants Nicholas F. Brady, David J. Butters, William E. Macaulay, RobertB. Millard, Robert K. Moses, Jr., RobertA. Rayne,

N. Scott Fletcher Elizabeth G. Myers JONES DAY 717 Texas, Suite 3300 Houston, TX 77002 832-239-3846 (Telephone) 832-239-3939 (Facsimile) sfletcher@jonesday.com egmyers@jonesday.com Attorney for Bernard J. Duroc-Danner

Rebecca N. Brandt LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 811 Main Street, Suite 3700 Houston, TX 77002 713-546-5400 (Telephone) 713-546-5401 (Facsimile) rebecca.brandt@lw.com
Peter A. Wald LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-395-8006 (Telephone) 415-395-8095 (Facsimile) peter.wald@lw.comKevin H. Metz LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 555 Eleventh Street NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20004 202-637-2200 (Telephone) 202-637-2201 (Facsimile) kevin.metz@lw.com 

### Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Weatherford International PLC Noelle M. Reed Charles W. Schwartz Daniel E. Bolia SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 6800 Houston, TX 77002 713-655-5122 (Telephone) 713-483-9122 (Facsimile) noelle.reed@skadden.com charles.schwartz@skadden.com daniel.bolia@skadden.com Robert S. Bennett Ellen Kennedy HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 202-637-5600 (Telephone) 202-637-5910 (Facsimile) robert

.bennett@hoganlovells.com ellen.kennedy@hoganlovells.com 

### Attorneys for BurtM Martin

[Date]

NOTES: Pursuant to Texas Rule ofAppellate Procedure 6.3, a party's lead counsel must be served. Service on other attorneys for that party is optional, but must be listed above ifthey are served. Pursuant to Texas Rule ofAppellate Procedure 52.7(c), the record mustbe served oneachpartyin an original proceeding, including a respondent trialjudge.
# Comments on: 2018-1067: Blast Motion, Inc. v. Iancu
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-334

Lower Tribunal No. 19-CF-015448

_____________________________

ROBERT DWAYNE HARRIS,

Appellant

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

Robert Branning, Judge.

April 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and WHITE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard J. D’Amico, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William Shelhart, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
You are here: EPA Home Region 10 Air Page SIPs/NWAPA SIPNWAPA104 

SIP - NWAPA 104 

SECTION 104 - ADOPTION OF STATE and FEDERAL LAWS and RULES 

104.1 All provisions of State Law as it now exists or may be hereafter amended, which 

is pertinent to the operation of the Authority is here by adopted by reference and made 

part of the Regulation of the Authority as of October 13, 1994. Specifically, there is 

adopted by reference the Washington State Clean Air Act (RCW 70.94), the 

Administrative Procedures Act (RCW 34.04) and RCW 43.21A and 43.21B and the 

following state rules: WAC 173-400, WAC 173-401, WAC 173-405, WAC 173-410, 

WAC 173-415, WAC 173-420, WAC 173-421, WAC 173-422, WAC 173-425, WAC 

173-430, WAC 173-433, WAC 173-434, WAC173-435, WAC 173-450, WAC 173-

460, WAC 173-470, WAC 173-474, WAC 173-475, WAC 173-480 , WAC 173-481, 

WAC 173-490, WAC 173-491, WAC 173-492, WAC 173-495, and WAC 173-802.

104.2 All provisions of the following federal rules are hereby adopted by reference and 

made part of the Regulation of the Authority as of October 13, 1994: 40 CFR Part 60 

(Standards of Performance For New Stationary Sources) subparts A, B, C, Ca, Cb, D, 

Da, Db, Dc, E, Ea, F, G, H, I, J, K, Ka, Kb, L, M, N, Na, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, 

Y, Z, AA, AAa, BB, CC, DD, EE, GG, HH, KK, LL, MM, NN, PP, QQ, RR, SS, TT, 

UU, VV, WW, XX, AAA, BBB, DDD, FFF, GGG, HHH, III, JJJ, KKK, LLL, NNN, 

OOO, PPP, QQQ, RRR, SSS, TTT, UUU, VVV; and 40 CFR Part 61 (National 

Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants) Subparts A, B, C, D, E, F, H, J, K, 

L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, T, V, W, Y, BB, FF and 40 CFR Part 63 (National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories) Subparts A, B, C, D, F, 

G, H, I, L, M, and Q. 

State effective: 11/13/94, EPA effective 12/26/95 

Region 10: the Pacific Northwest

Last updated on Saturday, March 12th, 2011.

URL: http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/airpage.nsf/SIPs/NWAPA/SIPNWAPA104

SIP - NWAPA 104 Page 1 of 1

http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/airpage.nsf/283d45bd5bb068e68825650f0064cdc2/cc51302d8... 3/15/2011