alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. NICOLAS OLIVARES PINEDA

From Wake County

No. 70P16

ORDER

The opinion of the Court of Appeals in this case states as follows: “the jury found Pineda guilty of violating N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95(a)(l) by trafficking heroin by sale and by delivery.” The Record on Appeal, however, reveals that defendant was convicted under N.C.G.S. § 90-95(h)(4). Accordingly, we allow the State’s petition for discretionary review for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of the correct statute of conviction.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 9th day of June, 2016.

s/Ervin. J.

For the Court

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 10th day of June, 2016.

J. BRYAN BOYD Clerk, Supreme Court of North Carolina

s/M.C. Hacknev Assistant Clerk, Supreme Court of North Carolina
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC00-75-000]


NiSource Inc.; Notice of Filing

June 22, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 19, 2000, NiSource Inc. and Columbia 
Energy Group supplemented their merger filing of April 10, 2000, with 
additional materials for Exhibit G under Part 33 of the Commission's 
Regulations.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protect such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before July 3, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16271 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
§ 302-7.15 Are there any disadvantages to using the commuted rate method for transporting HHG, PBP&E and temporary storage? Yes. The disadvantages to using the commuted rate method for transporting HHG, PBP&E and temporary storage are that the: ( a ) Government cannot take advantage of any special rates that may be offered only to Government shipments;
( b ) Commuted rate method does not apply to intrastate moves; and
( c ) Commuted rate method may not fully reimburse your out-of-pocket expenses.
[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18340, Apr. 1, 2011]
No. 11-9032.

#### Williams *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATION



I, John C. Fanning, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of COMFORCE Corporation, hereby certify that:



1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in
this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2004               
|/s/ John C. Fanning                 
|John C. Fanning,                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-15-00453-CR

________________

CHRISTOPHER LEE MUSSLEWHITE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 1A District Court

Jasper County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12240JD

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found appellant Christopher Lee Musslewhite guilty of burglary of a 

building, and the trial court assessed punishment at fifteen years of confinement

and a fine of $1000.

1

Musslewhite’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s 

professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. 

 1

The trial court punished Musslewhite as an habitual felony offender. 
2

Crim. App. 1978). On July 28, 2016, we granted an extension of time for 

Musslewhite to file a pro se brief. We received no response from Musslewhite.

We have reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel’s 

conclusion that no arguable issues support the appeal. Therefore, we find it 

unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf.

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial 

court’s judgment.2

AFFIRMED.

________________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN 

Chief Justice

 

Submitted on October 28, 2016

Opinion Delivered November 16, 2016

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

 2

Musslewhite may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
99–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–689 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE JOINT RESOLUTION (H.J. RES. 

105) MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL 

YEAR 2011, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

DECEMBER 17, 2010.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. POLIS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1776] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1776, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 105, ‘‘Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2011, and for 

other purposes,’’ under a closed rule. The resolution provides 1 

hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the joint resolution except those arising under clause 10 of rule 

XXI. The resolution provides that the joint resolution shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all points of order against 

the joint resolution. Finally, the resolution provides one motion to 

recommit with or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the joint 

resolution (except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI) includes a waiver of clause 9 of rule XXI (regarding earmark disclosure). 

Although the rule waives all points of order against the joint resolution, the Committee is not aware of any points of order against 

the joint resolution. The waiver of all points of order against the 

joint resolution is prophylactic. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with REPORTS
J-S02034-17

2017 PA Super 363

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT

OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

ABDUL MURRAY

Appellant No. 3010 EDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered April 30, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

Criminal Division at No: CP-51-CR-0001435-2013

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., STABILE, and MOULTON, JJ.

CONCURRING OPINION BY STABILE, J.: FILED NOVEMBER 15, 2017

I write briefly to emphasize that the record contains case-specific facts 

supporting Agent Todd Clark’s search of Appellant’s cell phone. Specifically, 

Appellant admitted to Agent Clark that he handled a firearm and passed it on 

to an acquaintance. Agent Todd believed, based on his prior experience, that 

Appellant’s cell phone could reveal communications referencing the firearm. 

Majority Opinion, at 13. I believe Appellant’s statement to Agent Clark, 

combined with Agent Clark’s prior experience, was sufficient to create 

reasonable suspicion in support of a search of Appellant’s cell phone. We are 

not faced here with a bald assertion, based on an agent’s experience, that cell 

phones often contain relevant evidence. Subject to this observation, I join 

the Majority’s well-reasoned opinion.
No. 11-23.

#### Middlebrooks *v.*St. Coletta of Greater Washington, Inc., et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Fuller, Chief Financial Officer of Rubio's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (a)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                  quarter ended June 29, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
                  Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (b)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2003             /s/ John Fuller
                                   -----------------------
                                   John Fuller
                                   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.10

MASTER AGREEMENT

This Master Agreement [*] (this "Agreement") dated as of
June 18, 2001, (the "Agreement Date") is made by and between the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") and E-Loan, Inc.,
Seller/Servicer [*] ("Seller").

Unless otherwise specified, the terms and conditions described in this
Agreement shall apply to Mortgages sold by Seller under a Master Commitment that
incorporates this Agreement by reference. This Agreement does not entitle Seller
to sell or obligate Freddie Mac to purchase Mortgages unless they have entered
into a Master Commitment incorporating the terms of this Agreement.

Master Agreement Amount:	[*]

Effective Date for Delivery:	June 1, 2001

Required Delivery Date:	May 31, 2002

Overpurchase Tolerance:	10 percent

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Master Agreement to
be duly executed by their respective authorized representatives as of the date
set forth above.

|FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION | E-LOAN INC               
|-------------------------------------- | -------------------------
|By:	/s/ Lori Vella                     | By:	/s/ Steven M. Majerus
|Name:	Lori Vella                       | Name:	Steven M. Majerus  
|Title:	Vice President, Sales           | Title:	V.P. Secondary Mkt

---
SCWC

- 21

- 0000294

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I , Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

KYLE P. MCCORMICK , Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS ( CAAP

- 21

- 0000294 ; CASE NO. 1DTC

- 20

- 003868 )

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant’s Application for Writ

of Certiorari, filed on September 23 , 2022, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, October 2 6 , 202 2

.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-21-0000294 26-OCT-2022 11:43 AM Dkt. 3 ODAC
#### §§ 301-10.144-301-10.159 [Reserved]
### STATE OF MA I NE D EPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL P ROTECTION

PAUL R. LEPAGE

GO V E RNOR 

# October 26 , 2015 David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch U.S. EPA Region 1-NE 5 Post Office Square Mail Code: OEP 05-2 Boston, Ma. 02109-3912 Dear Mr. Conroy: AV E RYT
. DAY ACTING COMM I SS I ONER



# Enclosed please find for your approval and inclusion into Maine's State Implementation Plan (SIP), Demonstration that Maine Complies with the Good Neighbor Requirements of Clean Air Act Section 11 O(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. A public comment period was held from August 28, 2015 until September 28, 2015 in accordance with federal and state administrative requirements. Public notice of the hearing was published on the Department's opportunity for comments webpage and in the Kennebec Journal. The following administrative materials are enclosed: 1. Confirmation that the public notice that appeared on the Department's webpage from August 28, 2015 until September 28, 2015 and the proof from the Kennebec Journal; and 2. The Department's final Demonstration that Maine Complies with the Good Neighbor Requirements of Clean Air Act Section 11 O(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. The Department received no comments during the comment period; as such there is no response to comments in include in this submission. The Department will also be submitting exact electronic copies of all enclosed materials. Should you have any questions, please contact Tom Graham at (207) 287-7598.

# fi**k~~** Marc Allen Robert Cone, Director Bureau of Air Quality Enclosures**\l <il** **~T** \ B \'.: ( ;() 1 ( 1 - :'T\TI·:**ll ~F** **~J"\ ill!'\**  I ll(, I I l l( ; \\: H ll \D.**~l '**  (,**.L <;L** **~T \,~I**  \1:--:1
. 11 4;;

_ ; 11 111- II \\:(;l lH. , \ 1. \ 1 \: 1' 0 44 111 ( 211- ) 2X- - - 6XX I · \X: ( 211

- ) 2 X - - - x26 • 211

- 1 ' 1 4 1

- 4 5

- .,**·~ :\** **:** ( 2 11

- j**1** 45X 4 I'() H TI.
. \ 

## · n I'H F :'<.l l " l · :**1~1. 1·** **:**

. >1 2 C 

### \ :--.:<:() Hll \D 1 2
. "15 Ct-:l'TH
. \1. D I U \ " F
.**~K \\** **Y** 1'
. \HK l' ll H T I.
. \ \:D , ! I.\ 1 \: 1 · : 1141113**I'R ~<.ll'** **'** bi .J-:. :\ ! \ 1 !\: 1' 1 14

- f•'J ( 20 - ) X22 - 6
. "1 1 11 1 1 · . \X : 1 21l- J X2 2 - r..>o .> 1 2 11- 1 -(, 4

- 11 4-- F \ :\ : ( 211

- ) - 611-
. "1 1 43
No. 11-29.

#### Malone *v.*Sherman, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 10-11239.

#### Forde *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 10-11040.

#### Oneal *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period June 30, 2012 (the "Report"), Praveen Nair, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1). To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. DATE: AUGUST 28th, 2012 /S/ PRAVEEN NAIRPRAVEEN NAIRCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,476
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  351,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,262
<INVENTORY>                                    470,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               854,393
<PP&E>                                         107,230
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,095,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          689,797
<BONDS>                                          2,337
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          194,739
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                     207,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,095,764
<SALES>                                      2,367,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,838,802
<CGS>                                        2,136,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,424,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 70,095
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             44,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81
        

</TABLE>
# Comments on: 2018-1427: Somers v. DVA
088A16

#### In the Matter of Tommie Junior Smith, Claim for Compensation Under the North Carolina Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program

1. Claimant’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Dissent (COA15-829)

1.—

2. Claimant’s PDR as to Additional Issues

2. Denied

3. Claimant’s Motion to Consolidate Appeals

3. Allowed 4. State’s Notice of Appeal

Based Upon a Dissent

4.-

5. State’s PDR as to Additional Issues

5. Allowed

6. State’s Motion to Consolidate Appeals

6. Allowed
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Openwave Systems Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David C. Peterschmidt, as Chief
Executive Officer of Openwave Systems Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of his knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Openwave Systems Inc.



|                 |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|                 |  | By: |  | /s/ David C. Peterschmidt            
|                 |  |     |  | David C. Peterschmidt                
|November 8, 2005 |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Openwave Systems Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Hal Covert, as Chief Financial Officer of Openwave
Systems Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of his knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Openwave Systems Inc.



|                 |  |     |  |                                                                      
|---------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | By: |  | /s/ Harold L. Covert                                                 
|November 8, 2005 |  |     |  | Harold L. Covert Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-11190.

#### Frazier *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.