alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Document 112-121]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

112th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 112-121

 
TERMINATION OF GIBRALTAR AND TURKS AND CAICOS AS BENEFICIARY DEVELOPING 
     COUNTRIES UNDER THE GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES PROGRAM

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                     THEPRESIDENTOFTHEUNITEDSTATES

                              transmitting

 NOTIFICATION OF THE TERMINATION OF GIBRALTAR AND TURKS AND CAICOS AS 
   BENEFICIARY DEVELOPING COUNTRIES UNDER THE GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF 
                          PREFERENCES PROGRAM

    June 29, 2012.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
    In accordance with section 502(f)(2) of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (the ``1974 Act'') (19 U.S.C. 2462(f)(2)), I 
am providing notification of my intent to terminate the 
designations of Gibraltar and the Turks and Caicos Islands as 
beneficiary developing countries under the Generalized System 
of Preferences (GSP) program. Section 502(e) of the 1974 Act 
(19 U.S.C. 2462(e)) provides that if the President determines 
that a beneficiary developing country has become a ``high 
income'' country, as defined by the official statistics of the 
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (i.e., 
the World Bank), then the President shall terminate the 
designation of such country as a beneficiary developing country 
for purposes of GSP, effective on January 1 of the second year 
following the year in which such determination is made.
    Pursuant to section 502(e) of the 1974 Act, I have 
determined that it is appropriate to terminate Gibraltar's 
designation as a beneficiary developing country under the GSP 
program, because it has become a high income country as defined 
by the World Bank. Accordingly, Gibraltar's eligibility for 
trade benefits under the GSP program will end on January 1, 
2014.
    In addition, pursuant to section 502(e) of the 1974 Act, I 
have determined that it is appropriate to terminate Turks and 
Caicos Islands' designation as a beneficiary developing country 
under the GSP program, because it has become a high income 
country as defined by the World Bank. Accordingly, Turks and 
Caicos Islands' eligibility for trade benefits under the GSP 
program will end on January 1, 2014.

                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, June 29, 2012.

                                  

```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960

November 27, 2012
MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Typographical Errors in Federal Register Document EPA-R04-0AR-2012- 0751; FRL-9751-8, Approval and Promulgation ofImplementation Plans and Designation ofAreas for Air QualityPlanningPurposes; Kentucky; Redesignation ofthe Kentucky Portion ofthe Huntington-Ashland 1997 Annual Fine Particulate MatterNonattainment Area to Attainment FROM: Joel Huey Regulatory TO: File and Docket EPA-R04-0AR-2012-0751
This memorandum is to document the following typographical errors in Federal Register document EPA-R04-0AR-2012-0751; FRL-9751-8, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designation ofAreas for Air QualityPlanning Purposes; Kentucky; Redesignation ofthe Kentucky Portion oftheHuntington-Ashland 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter Nonattainment Area to Attainment, published on November 19,2012: Page Column Erroneous Text Correct text 69411 3rd column April 5, 2011 April 5, 201Q 69422 151 column
...through 2021 into the
...through**202~** into the Kentucky SIP. Kentucky SIP.

Internet Address (URL) • http //www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (M1n1mum 30% Postconsumer}
§ 51-4.5 Violations by nonprofit agencies. ( a ) Any alleged violations of these regulations by a nonprofit agency shall be investigated by the Committee which shall notify the nonprofit agency concerned and afford it an opportunity to submit a statement of facts and evidence. Pending a decision by the Committee, the central nonprofit agency concerned may be directed by the Committee to temporarily suspend allocations to the nonprofit agency.
( b ) If a nonprofit agency fails to correct its violations of these regulations, the Committee, after affording the nonprofit agency an opportunity to address the Committee on the matter, may terminate the nonprofit agency's eligibility to participate in the JWOD Program.
[56 FR 48979, Sept. 26, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 59343, Nov. 16, 1994; 73 FR 28043, May 15, 2008]
SEC Connect





 











Exhibit 10.3



 



Amendment No. 1 to the



Executive Employment Agreement



Between Track Group, Inc. and Derek Cassell



Dated December 1, 2016


 


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to that certain
Executive Employment Agreement by and between Track Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) and Derek Cassell (the
“Executive”) entered into as of February 13,
2017.


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive
entered into that certain Executive Employment Agreement dated
December 1, 2016 (the “Employment
Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive
desire to amend one provision of the Employment
Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as
follows:


 

1. Paragraph 3B. of
the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:


 



“B.

Subject to approval
by the Board of Directors, you will be issued 60,000 unregistered
restricted shares of Company common stock (the
“Shares”). The Shares shall bear an applicable
restrictive legend. The Shares shall vest as follows: (i) fifty
percent (50%) of the Shares shall vest immediately upon issuance,
and (ii) the remaining Shares shall vest on March 30, 2018. In the
event of Executive’s death or permanent disability all of the
Shares shall immediately vest. Prior to the transfer or any of the
Shares during any period during which the Shares are not registered
by the Company under an effective registration statement filed
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Executive shall
comply with all laws and regulations for the transfer of restricted
shares, as well as the Company’s trading policies and
procedures as set forth in the Corporate Governance Manual. The
Company covenants that in the event it proposes to file a
registration statement to register shares with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Shares would be
eligible for registration on such registration statement, the
Company, with Executive’s written consent, shall include the
Shares in such registration statement.






 


In the
event Executive’s employment with the Company is terminated
before all of the Shares are vested, Executive shall forfeit any
unvested Shares.”


 

2. Exhibit
“A” of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its
entirety.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties
has executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Executive Employment
Agreement between Track Group, Inc. and Derek Cassell dated
December 1, 2016, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized
officer, as of the day and year first above written.


 

                                                                                               




	
 TRACK
GROUP, INC. 


	
 EXECUTIVE


	
 

	
 


	
 By:___________________________ 



	
 ___________________________ 


	
 Guy
Dubois

	
 Derek
Cassell


	
 Chief Executive
Officer

	
 


	
 Chairman of the
Board
158P06-6

#### State v. Derrick D. Boger

Defs *Pro Se*Motion for *Mandamus*

Denied
Merrimack

No. 79-254

#### Edward L. Duby, Jr. v. Apple Town Realty, Inc.

June 18, 1980

*Leslie R. Long,*of Concord, by brief for the plaintiff.

*Orr & Reno,*of Concord, by brief for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

The sole issue presented for review is whether the evidence supports the court’s dismissal of this action against the defendant *439for negligent misrepresentation. A review of the record reveals that the evidence supports the court’s action; we therefore overrule the plaintiff’s exceptions transferred by *Cann,*J., upon a master’s report *{William Beckett,*Esq.).

Both the present case and the companion case of *Duby v. Osgood,*120 N.H. 356, 415 A.2d 326 (1980), arose out of the plaintiff’s purchase of a parcel of land from Mark and Diana Osgood. In *Osgood,*we affirmed the master’s finding that the plaintiff had failed to prove that the deed conveyed by the Osgoods was not marketable. *Id.*at 357, 415 A.2d at 327. In this action against the real estate broker involved in the transaction, the plaintiff seeks to recover for damages suffered as a result of allegedly false representations regarding the state of title to the land.

This court has held that a plaintiff can recover if he proves that he suffered damages as a result of reliance placed on false statements made by one who should have known them to be false. *Maxwell Ice Co. v. Company,*80 N.H. 236, 116 A. 34 (1921). The record in the present case indicates that the broker represented to the plaintiff that the Osgoods owned the property, which they did by virtue of quitclaim deeds. In the companion case, the master found that the broker reasonably believed that the Osgoods were the owners, and that he did not make the statement with knowledge that it was false. The evidence adduced at trial does not compel a contrary conclusion. It is unnecessary for us to decide whether the broker’s statement was false or not. Because the plaintiff failed to prove an essential element of his case, namely that the broker knew or should have known that he spoke an untruth, the plaintiff’s case must fail.

*Exceptions overruled.*
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jennifer Dawson, Chief Financial Officer of Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Jennifer DawsonName:
Jennifer DawsonTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
March 31, 2011




This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
No. 11-9376.

#### Moreno *v.*Adams, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4308 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4308

  To amend the North American Wetlands Conservation Act to authorize 
appropriations for allocations under that Act for wetlands conservation 
                               projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 1994

  Mr. Dingell (for himself, Mr. Weldon, Mr. Studds, and Mr. Fields of 
    Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the North American Wetlands Conservation Act to authorize 
appropriations for allocations under that Act for wetlands conservation 
                               projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ALLOCATIONS UNDER NORTH 
              AMERICAN WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT.

    Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking ``$15,000,000'' and all that 
follows through the end of the sentence and inserting the following: 
``$15,000,000 for fiscal year 1994, $20,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 1995 and 1996, $30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1997 and 
1998, and $40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 and 2000.''.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4280

To amend the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act to require

that the motor vehicle bumper standard established by the Secretary

of Transportation shall be restored to that in effect January 1, 1982.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1994

Mr. BEILENSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings

Act to require that the motor vehicle bumper standard

established by the Secretary of Transportation shall be

restored to that in effect January 1, 1982.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 102 of the Motor Vehicle Information and

4 Cost Savings Act (15 U.S.C. 1912) is amended by adding

5 at the end thereof the following new subsection:

6 ‘‘(f)(1) Not later than one year after the date of en7 actment of this subsection, the Secretary shall amend the

8 bumper standard contained in sections 581.1 through
2

HR 4280 IH

1 581.7 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, to ensure

2 that, except as provided in paragraph (2), such standard

3 is identical to the bumper standard under such sections

4 which was in effect on January 1, 1982. The amended

5 standard shall apply to all passenger automobiles begin6 ning with the model year after the date of amendment of

7 the standard.

8 ‘‘(2) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to

9 prohibit the Secretary from requiring impact speeds under

10 such sections higher than the impact speed contained in

11 such amended standard.’’.

Æ
250 E Street SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000 / 800-942-2677

202-606-5000 / 800-942-2677

Developing Policies and Procedures: A Resource for AmeriCorps State and National 

Grantees eLearning Course 

The AmeriCorps State and National statute, regulations, and terms and conditions outline 

requirements for grantees to have specific policies and procedures for all aspects of 

managing an AmeriCorps program, including human resources, member recruitment and 

eligibility, member management, and fiscal oversight. This training guides you through the 

process of developing the policies and procedures for all aspects of your AmeriCorps 

program.

This course is available on the AmeriCorps Litmos learning platform. If you do not have a 

Litmos account, you can create one by following the steps in the Litmos Getting Started 

Guide. 

Developing Policies and Procedures: A Resource for AmeriCorps State and National 

Grantees Workbook

This workbook is designed to accompany the eLearning course. This workbook is available

on AmeriCorps State and National AmeriCorps.gov grantee pages, under the “Access

program tools” filter.
### VERMONT SUPREME COURT Case No. 23

- AP

- 156

109 State Street

Montpelier VT 05609

- 0801

802

- 828

- 4774

www.vermontjudiciary.org

Note: In the case title, an asterisk (*) i ndicates an appellant and a double asterisk (**) indicates a cross

appellant. Decisions of a three

- justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal.



### ENTRY ORDER

OCTOBER TERM

, 2023

M.J.* v. L.C.S.D

. } APPEAL E D F ROM:

} Superior Court, Lamoille Unit

, Civil Division

} CASE NO. 23

- CV

- 00304

Trial Judge: Daniel Richardson

In the above

- entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:

Plaintiff appeals pro se from the dismissal of his complaint for failure to stat e a claim

upon which rel ie f can be granted

. We affirm.

In its di sm issal order, the co urt found that p laintiff wa s a serial filer from the State of

Delaware who had made similar and repetitive claims in various jurisdictions. Plaintiff h ad filed

a

p pr oxi m a te ly 100 comp laints in courts through out the Nor theast

, which were all dismiss ed at an

earl y stag e . Plaintiff had been sanctioned for his behavior. The cou rt described plaintiff ’ s

allegations as “rambling and often incoherent with odd references to ste m ce lls, death, re

- birth,

regrowth of body parts, and vir uses

. ” The court co ncluded that , p utting aside the dubious nature

of his claim s, p laintiff’s complaint d id not survive a basic legal analysis under V ermont Rule of

Civil P rocedu re 12(b)(6 ).

Plainti ff i de n t ifie s no discer nable or persuasive basis to overturn the trial court ’ s d ecision.

See Johnson v. Johnson , 158 Vt. 160, 16 4 n * (1992) ( explaining that Sup reme Court will not

address contentions so inadequately briefed as to fail to minimally meet st anda rds of V.R.A .P.

28(a))

. Aside from a summary sen tence

, the s tatements in his brief d o not appear to relate to the

merits of t h e decision on appeal. As we h ave often repeated, “ [ i] t is the burden of the appellant

to demonstrate ho w t he lower court err ed w arranting reversal ” and “ [w] e will not comb the2 record searching for error. ” In re S.B.L. , 150 Vt. 294, 297 (1988)

. Plainti f f fails to show any

basis to dis turb the court ’ s di smissal or der here

.

Affirmed

.

BY THE COURT:

Harold E. Eaton, Jr., Associate Justice

Karen R. Carroll, Associate Justice

Nancy J. Waples, Associate Justice
No. 10-10957.

#### Sherrod *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32(a)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael G. Morris,
the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that,
based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Michael G.
Morris  _


Michael
G. Morris


Chief
Executive Officer








May 1,
2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1](/current/title-47/part-1?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at [63 FR 54077](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/63-FR-54077), Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.271 Delegation of review function.

The Commission may direct, by order or rule, that its review function in a case or category of cases be performed by a commissioner, or a panel of commissioners, in which event the commissioner or panel shall exercise the authority and perform the functions which would otherwise have been performed by the Commission under [§§ 1.273](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-1.273) through [1.282](/on/2024-09-20/title-47/section-1.282).

Note:

To provide for an orderly completion of cases, exceptions and related pleadings filed after March 1, 1996, shall be directed to the Commission and will not be acted upon by the Review Board.

[[62 FR 4171](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-4171), Jan. 29, 1997]