alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 E0 03 3 . I N RE KHASI N.

A1 5 E0 03 4 , A1 5 E0 0 3 5

, A1 5 E0 0 3 6 . THE STATE v . SHOOB (three ca s es ).

A s u p eri o r co urt h as en t ered an o rd e r a n d f i l e d i t i n a cas e s t y l ed

, “ In r e

Kh a s i n ,” Cas e Nu m

b er 2 0 1 5 -EX-0 0 7 4 1

, i n w h i ch th e ju d g e p u rp o rt s to recu s e fro m

m a t t e r s h an d l ed b y a p art i cu l ar as s i s t an t di s t ri ct at to rn ey

, b u t n ot fro m t h e c a s e s

t h em s el v es

. 1 T h e St at e h as fi led fo u r em erg en cy m o t i o n s

, o n e d i rect ly ari s in g fro m

t h e o rd er i n In r e Kh a s i n an d t h ree t o s t ay s p eci fi c cri m i n al cas es p o ten t i al l y affect ed

b y t h e Kh a s i n o r d e r

. 2 T h es e em erg en cy m o t i o n s

, h owev er, d o n o t m eet t h e

req u i rem en t s o f Co u rt o f A p peal s Ru l e 40 (b ) b ecau s e di rect i o n to t h e t ri al co u r t i s

“ n o t n eces s ary t o pres erv e ju ri s d i ct i o n o f an ap p eal or to p rev en t t h e co n tes t ed i s s u e

fro m b eco m i n g m o ot .” 3 Acco rd i n gl y , t h e em erg en cy m o t i on s are D ENI ED

.

1 Un i fo rm Su p eri or Co u rt Ru l e 2 5 ex p l ai n s t h e p ro ced u res fo r recu s al fro m a

p art i cu l ar cas e o r p ro ceed in g

. See al s o In r e In q u i r y Co n cer n i n g a Ju dg e No .9 3 -1 5 4

, 2 6 3 Ga. 8 8 3

, 8 8 4 (4 4 0 SE2 d 1 6 9 ) (1 9 9 4 ) (“ Qu es t i on s o f recu s al m u s t b e co n s i d ered

o n a cas e-b y -cas e b as i s

, ap p l yi n g t h e p ert i nen t l aws o f t h i s St at e.”); Ga. Co d e o f

J u d i ci al Co n du ct Can o n 2 .1 1 (A) (“ J u d g es s hal l di s q u a l i f y t h em s el v es i n an y

p ro ceed in g in wh i ch t h ei r i m p art i al i t y m i g ht reas o n ab l y be q u es t i o ned

, o r i n wh i ch :

(1 ) Th e j u d g e h as a p ers on al b i as o r p reju d i ce co n cern i n g a p art y o r a p art y ’ s l awy er.

. . .”) (em p h as i s o m i t ted ).

2 Th e St at e h as s t y l ed th e t h ree em erg en cy m o t i o n s t o s t ay in th e cri m in al cas es

as ag ai n s t t h e s u p eri o r co urt ju dg e i n h er o ffi ci al cap aci t y

.

3 W e n o t e t h at t h e ap p eal o f In r e Kh a s i n was d o ck et ed i n t h i s co u rt on J u n e 1 0,

2 0 1 5

. June 10, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 06/10/2015
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-12991) pertaining to the 1976 Employees' Incentive
Stock Option Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-11565) pertaining to the 1995 Stock
Option Plan and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3/A No. 333-11547, Form S-3 No. 333-11547, and Form S-4 No. 33-99278)
and the related Prospectuses of our report dated December 19, 1996, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Autologic Information International,
Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended November 1,
1996.




                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                ------------------------------
                                                    Ernst & Young LLP




Woodland Hills, California
January 29, 1997
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4313

To prohibit the admission to the United States as refugees individuals who

served in the armed forces of Iraq during the Persian Gulf conflict,

and to deport any such individuals who have been so admitted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1994

Mr. KANJORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit the admission to the United States as refugees

individuals who served in the armed forces of Iraq during

the Persian Gulf conflict, and to deport any such individuals who have been so admitted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF IRAQI SOLDIERS AS REFU4 GEES.

5 (a) PROHIBITION ON ADMISSION.—Notwithstanding

6 any other provision of law, an individual who served in

7 the armed forces of Iraq during the Persian Gulf conflict
2

•HR 4313 IH

1 may not be admitted to the United States as a refugee

2 under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICATION.—

4 (1) Subsection (a) shall be deemed to have

5 taken effect on August 2, 1990.

6 (2) An individual who has been admitted to the

7 United States as a refugee, but would be ineligible

8 for admission under subsection (a), shall have such

9 refugee status revoked and shall be deported.

10 (c) PERSIAN GULF CONFLICT DEFINED.—For pur11 poses of this section, the term ‘‘Persian Gulf conflict’’

12 means the period beginning on August 2, 1990 and ending

13 on February 27, 1991.

Æ
FY 2009 Report of Withdrawals in Accordance with ISOO’s “Interim Guidelines Governing Rereview of Previously Declassified Records at the National Archives” (April 2006)

The interim guidelines, available online at http://www.archives.gov/isoo/reports/2006-audit-report-attach2.pdf, are pending formal promulgation, to include public comment, as a change to 32 C.F.R. Part 

2001.13.

Please refer to the “Audit of the Withdrawal of Records from Public Access at the National Archives and 

Records Administration for Classification Purposes, April 26, 2006,” (http://www.archives.gov/isoo/

reports/2006-audit-report.html) concerning records formally withdrawn prior to April 26, 2006. 

First Quarter FY 2009, October – December 2008

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal

NARA Location Where

Withdrawal Took Place

Date 

Withdrawn

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn

None withdrawn

Second Quarter FY 2009, January – March 2009

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal

NARA Location Where

Withdrawal Took Place

Date 

Withdrawn

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn

Navy Nixon Presidential Library at 

College Park 2/17/09 1 (136 pages)* 1 page 

redacted

Navy National Archives at College 

Park 1/15/09 1 (22 pages) 4 pages 

redacted

Navy National Archives at College 

Park 1/15/09 1 (14 pages) 3 pages

redacted

 *corrected 08/17/10 to clarify page count of withdrawn record

Third Quarter FY 2009, April – June 2009

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal

NARA Location Where

Withdrawal Took Place

Date 

Withdrawn

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn

None withdrawn

Fourth Quarter FY 2009, July – September 2009

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal

NARA Location Where

Withdrawal Took Place

Date 

Withdrawn

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn

None withdrawn

For more information about this report, contact NARA’s Public Affairs Office at (202) 357-5100.
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4253

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14 (legislative day, JULY 11), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To require the Secretary of the Interior to convey the

Corning National Fish Hatchery to the State of Arkansas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Corning National Fish

5 Hatchery Conveyance Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CORNING NATIONAL FISH HATCH7 ERY TO STATE OF ARKANSAS.

8 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of

9 the Interior shall convey to the State of Arkansas, without

10 reimbursement and by no later than December 31, 1994,

11 all right, title, and interest of the United States in and

12 to the property described in subsection (b), for use by the
2

HR 4253 RFS

1 Arkansas Game and Fish Commission as part of the State

2 of Arkansas fish culture program.

3 (b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred

4 to in subsection (a) is the property known as the Corning

5 National Fish Hatchery (popularly known as the William

6 H. Donham State Fish Hatchery), located one mile west

7 of Corning, Arkansas, on Arkansas State Highway 67 in

8 Clay County, Arkansas, consisting of 137.34 acres (more

9 or less), and all improvements and related personal prop10 erty under the control of the Secretary that is located on

11 that property, including buildings, structures, and equip12 ment.

13 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST OF UNITED STATES.—

14 All right, title, and interest in property described in sub15 section (b) shall revert to the United States if the property

16 ceases to be used as part of the State of Arkansas fish

17 culture program. The State of Arkansas shall ensure that

18 the property reverting to the United States is in substan19 tially the same or better condition as at the time of trans20 fer.

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-228-CV

LINDA HALL	APPELLANT	

	V.

OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On July 16, 2009 and August 4, 2009, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.  

DELIVERED:  August 25, 2009
# Comments on: 20-2329: MODERNA TX, INC. v. ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION [OPINION], Precedential
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 646

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide that motor carriers safety

permits for the transportation of hazardous material be subject to annual

renewal.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1999

Mr. PASCRELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide that

motor carriers safety permits for the transportation of

hazardous material be subject to annual renewal.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 5109 of title 49, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) in subsection (c) by inserting ‘‘annual’’ be6 fore ‘‘application with’’;

7 (2) in subsection (e)(2) by striking ‘‘duration,

8 terms,’’ and inserting ‘‘terms’’;
2

•HR 646 IH

1 (3) by redesignating subsection (h) as sub2 section (i); and

3 (4) by inserting after subsection (g) the follow4 ing:

5 ‘‘(h) DURATION.—A safety permit issued under this

6 section shall be effective for a period of 1 year.’’.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 416

To extend the period during which chapter 12 of title 11 of the United

States Code remains in effect; and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. SYNAR (for himself and Mr. GRANDY) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To extend the period during which chapter 12 of title 11

of the United States Code remains in effect; and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME PERIOD.

4 The first sentence of section 302(f) of the Bank5 ruptcy Judges, United States Trustees, and Family Farm6 er Bankruptcy Act of 1986 (Public Law 99–554; 100

7 Stat. 3124) is amended by striking ‘‘1993’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘1998’’.
2

•HR 416 IH

1 SEC. 2. FILING OF PLAN.

2 Section 1221 of title 11, United States Code, is

3 amended by striking ‘‘an extension is substantially justi4 fied’’ and inserting ‘‘the need for an extension is attrib5 utable to circumstances for which the debtor should not

6 justly be held accountable’’.

Æ
No. 11-9000.

#### Pegues *v.*PGW Auto Glass LLC et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6497

SHERMAN D. PAYNE-EL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, FCI Cumberland,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-98-150-WMN)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherman D. Payne-El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s motion to file a supplemental informal brief, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Payne-El v. Warden, No. CA-98-150-WMN (D.

Md. Mar. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 109-43.304 Reporting requirements.
394P15

#### Alan Savage v. Julie Anne Zelent a/k/a Julie Anne Phillips a/k/a Julie A. McSwain

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-282)

Denied
MICHAEL W. KELLEY 

SUPERVISOR DISTRICT 3 

940 MAIN STREET, SUITE 209 

EL CENTRO, CA 92243 rJjoarb of ~uperbisors 

l!ountp of Jfmperial 

BLS: {760) 482-4220 

BUS: \ 760) 482-4308 

FAX: (?60) 482-4215 

E-MAIL: mkcllcy(a~co.imp(:ria!.c'i us 

May 7, 2014 

Secretary Anthony Foxx 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket DOT -OST -2008-0299 

Dear Secretary F oxx, 

·····:., 

:' 

" .. 1::. 

I write to express my concerns with the Department of Transportation's Tentative Order to 

terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) program in El Centro, California located in Imperial 

County. I urge you to consider the negative economic impacts that may occur as a result of the 

proposed termination ofthe program. 

The Imperial County Airport has a tremendous track record of surpassing the EAS program 

requirements put forth by the government, as they have dramatically exceeded the enplanement 

minimum in four of the last five fiscal years. Unfortunately, in FY 2013, the Imperial County 

Airport barely fell below the ten enplanement threshold, by reaching 9.5 enplanements for the 

first time. 

As you know, the Essential Air Service was put into place to guarantee that small communities, 

including those within the Imperial County, continue to be served by certificated air carriers. 

Over the last several years, Imperial County has experienced the highest unemployment rate in 

the nation. Our federal government should encourage economic growth, and consider all factors 

before terminating a much-needed program in the region. 

As you prepare the Final Order, I urge you to consider the Imperial Valley's track record over 

the last three fiscal years, and ask that you consider the void that will be left should the 

Department of Transportation ultimately decide to terminate the much-needed Essential Air 

Service program currently in effect at the Imperial County Airport. 

Thank you for your time and consideration of my request. 

Sincerelv. 

~ ,f}!RJ ,) ./..?~ Michael w. ~~. . K e~q/ Imperial County Board of Supervi#$ 

AN EQU \L OPPORTL NlTY I AFf'li\MATIVE ACTIO!\ J;~fi'LOYJ~:R 

"·· ;·. 

. .···~ ..
§ 109-43.313 Use of excess personal property on cooperative agreements. ( a ) - ( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Program Secretarial Officer (PSO) shall ensure that required records are maintained in a current status.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s/Robert A. Paul
 Robert A. Paul
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 May 10, 2010
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Cape Henry to Pamlico Sound,including Albemarle Sound, Virginia--North Carolina [electronic resource]**
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.418/7:12205/

Item Number:0191-B-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000878593
 
1984 | 1985 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991| 1992
 
April 21, 2020
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 11, 2019

a1204

Order 

Clerk

December 11, 2019

159835

BEVERLY JUNE GRAY, Personal

Representative of the ESTATE OF WANDA

JESSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 159835

COA: 341805 

Berrien CC: 17-000215-NM

LAKELAND SPECIALTY HOSPITAL

AT BERRIEN CENTER,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40717-40718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16667]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Aging Transport Systems Rulemaking Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a public meeting of the FAA's Aging 
Transport Systems Rulemaking Advisory Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held July 19-20, 2000, beginning at 9 a.m. 
on July 19. Arrange for oral representations by July 12.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be at the Bessie Coleman Conference Center, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry K. Stubblefield, Office of 
Rulemaking, ARM-208, FAA, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591, Telephone (202) 267-7624, FAX (202) 267-5075.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Aging Transport Systems Rulemaking Advisory Committee in the Bessie 
Coleman Conference Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC.

    The agenda will include:

Day 1

<bullet> Opening remarks.
<bullet> Working group reports, review and vote.

[[Page 40718]]

    <bullet> Task 1 (Sampling Inspection of the fleet) and Task 2 
(Review of fleet service history) review and vote on recommendations
    <bullet> Task 3 (Improvement of maintenance criteria) review
    <bullet> Task 4 (Review and update standard practices for 
wiring) review and vote on recommendations
    <bullet> Task 5 (Review air carrier and repair station training 
programs) review
    <bullet> Determine action plan related to mixing wire types in 
bundles; all presentations optional

Day 2

<bullet> Status of arc fault circuit interrupter development by 
Industry Contractors
<bullet> Status of arc fault circuit interrupters program
<bullet> Overview of circuit breaker research
<bullet> Discussion of SDR Analysis and Normalization on Non-
electric Systems
<bullet> Intrusive inspections status report

    Attendance is open to the interested public but will be limited 
to the space available. The public must make arrangements by July 
12, 2000, to present oral statements at the meeting. The public may 
present written statements to the committee at any time by providing 
20 copies to the Executive Director, or by bringing the copies to 
him at the meeting. Public statements will only be considered if 
time permits. In addition, sign and oral interpretation as well as a 
listening device can be made available if requested 10 calendar days 
before the meeting.

    Issued in Washington, DC on June 26, 2000.
Anthony F. Fazio,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 00-16667 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4916-13-M
#### § 302-4.300 What is the POV mileage rate for PCS travel?

For approved/authorized PCS travel by POV, the mileage reimbursement rate is the same as the moving expense mileage rate established by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for moving expense deductions. See IRS guidance available on the Internet at *https://www.irs.gov.* GSA publishes the rate for mileage reimbursement in an FTR Bulletin on an intermittent basis. You may find the FTR Bulletins at *https://gsa.gov/ftrbulletins*.

[FTR Amdt. 2007-06, 72 FR 70235, Dec. 11, 2007, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2020-02, 84 FR 64781, Nov. 25, 2019; 85 FR 39850, July 2, 2020]