alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
398P08-2

#### Wesley Foust-Graham Goodwin, Surviving Spouse of James Lester Goodwin v. Norman B. Smith

1. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion to Toll the 30 Days Filing Rule (COA04-1206)

1. Denied

2. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR

2. Dismissed

3. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for New Trial

3. Dismissed

4. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion to Correct the Original Complaint

4. Allowed

5. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion to Deny Defendant’s Prayer for Dismissal

5. Dismissed
Stats of IUR Database Queries Requested for the Economic Analysis for the IUR Modification Rule

1. Issue: Reduce or Eliminate the Threshold for Downstream Processing and Use Reporting (FR 710.52(c) to levels of 100,000 lbs., 50,000 lbs, or 25,000 lbs.
Statistic Mfg + Imp

Volume >= 300,000 lbs Mfg + Imp

Volume >= 100,000 lbs Mfg + Imp

Volume >= 50,000 lbs Mfg + Imp

Volume >= 25,000 lbs # of Reports 17 , 075 20 , 702 23 ,1 63 25 , 896 # of Companies 1 , 360 1 ,466 1 , 506 1 , 530 # of Sites 3 , 517 3 , 811 3 , 978 4 , 085 # of Chemicals 3 , 689 4 , 809 5 ,470 6 , 149 # Reports = Total number of data lines for desired ranges # Com panies = Unique Formal Names for desired ranges # Sites = Unique IUR report numbers for desired ranges # Chemicals = Unique chemical numbers for desired range s
2. Issue: Change the Timeframe for Reporting (CFR 710.52(c)(3)) List of chemical/site combinations that appeared in the 1998 database but not the 2002 database. Include 1998 production volume. Total Number: 19,307 +
List of chemical/site combinations that appeared in the 2002 database but not the 2006 database. Include 2002 production volume. Total Number:

3. Issue: Excessive CBI claims for Downstream Processing and Use (DPU)
2006 Information: # of Reports Providing Any Processing and Use Information 21 , 334 # of CBI Claims for Site ID in 2006 1 , 547 Statistic Claimed CBI Claimed NRO # of Reports 8 , 133 10 , 220 # of Companies 396 756 # of Discrete Chemicals 2 , 724 1 , 942 # Reports = Total number of data lines for desired value # Com panies = Unique Formal Names for desired value # Chemicals = Unique chemical numbers for desired value

4. Issue: Chemical Exemption for Manufactured Water # of Reports Submitted in 2006 43 # of Sites That Submitted in 2006 43 # of Companies That Submitted in 2006 34Used 773 2

- 18

- 5 as the chemical identifying number for the search # Reports = Total number of data lines for desired ranges # Sites = Unique IUR report numbers for desired ranges # Com panies = Unique Formal Names for desired ranges

5. Issue: Site

-limited (CFR 710.52 (c)(3)) # and % of Reports Site

- limited in 2006 3 , 910 14.8 % # and % of Companies Site

- limited in 2006 495 12 % # and % of Discrete Chemicals Site

-limited in 2006 1 , 393 22.4 % # Reports = Total number of data lines for desired value # Com panies = Unique F ormal Names for desired value # Chemicals = Unique chemical numbers for desired value
EXHIBIT 23
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-127022) pertaining to the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2005 Stock Plan of Overhill Farms, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-130921) of our report dated December 9, 2010, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Overhill Farms, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 26, 2010.
  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
  Los Angeles, California
 December 9, 2010
Exhibit
23.2





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-21735, No.
333-50293 and 333-131692) of KSW, Inc. of our report dated March 23, 2009,
relating to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, which are included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.





/s/ J.H.
Cohn LLP


White
Plains, New York


March 19,
2010
Note: This order is nonprecedential. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT 

NO. 86 

On Petition for Review of Order and supporting memorandum

dated April 3, 2008

DECIDED: June 11, 2008 

Per Curiam 

 A petition for review filed May 5, 2008, seeking review of the order of Chief Judge 

Michel, dated April 3, 2008, which dismissed the complaint of judicial misconduct or 

disability, having been referred to the active judges of the court eligible to participate in 

the review, and the petition for review, the underlying complaint, and Chief Judge 

Michel’s order having been considered, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The order dismissing the complaint is hereby affirmed. 

 FOR THE COURT 

 /Jan Horbaly/ 

 Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3
AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,142
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                       118
<INVENTORY>                                        133
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,736
<PP&E>                                           1,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,305
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,707
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,346
<SALES>                                          4,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,950
<CGS>                                            1,181
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   119
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,848)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,848)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,848)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.17)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                       104
<INVENTORY>                                      2,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,837
<PP&E>                                           6,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,910
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,606
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,857)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,394
<SALES>                                          1,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,458
<CGS>                                            1,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (695)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (695)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (695)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-1100.

#### Meeks *v.*Donahoe, Postmaster General.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16615]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 7, 2000.
    Time: 10 am to 2 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 1205, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Anna Ramsey-Ewing, PHD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2220, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7610, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301 496-2550, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81e0f3b0b4eec1efe8e9afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2e4f5c1f1b416e40474600494158">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 21, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-16615 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 102-36.440 Are there special procedures for reporting excess printing and binding equipment and supplies?

Yes, in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 312, you must submit reports of excess printing and binding machinery, equipment, materials, and supplies to the Public Printer, Government Printing Office (GPO), Customer Service Manager, 732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20401. If GPO has no requirement for the property, you must then submit the report to GSA.

[65 FR 31218, May 16, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 53572, Sept. 12, 2006]
#### § 50-201.1201 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1200 Introduction. ( a ) *Purpose.* To ensure the fairness and integrity of its decision-making, the Commission has prescribed rules to regulate *ex parte* presentations in Commission proceedings. These rules specify “exempt” proceedings, in which *ex parte* presentations may be made freely (§ 1.1204(b)), “permit-but-disclose” proceedings, in which *ex parte* presentations to Commission decision-making personnel are permissible but subject to certain disclosure requirements (§ 1.1206), and “restricted” proceedings in which *ex parte* presentations to and from Commission decision-making personnel are generally prohibited (§ 1.1208). In all proceedings, a certain period (”the Sunshine Agenda period”) is designated in which all presentations to Commission decision-making personnel are prohibited (§ 1.1203). The limitations on *ex parte* presentations described in this section are subject to certain general exceptions set forth in § 1.1204(a). Where the public interest so requires in a particular proceeding, the Commission and its staff retain the discretion to modify the applicable *ex parte* rules by order, letter, or public notice. Joint Boards may modify the *ex parte* rules in proceedings before them.
( b ) Inquiries concerning the propriety of *ex parte* presentations should be directed to the Office of General Counsel.
[62 FR 15853, Apr. 3, 1997]
Exhibit 32.2



                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS



I, Thomas W. Horton, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of
AT&T Corp., certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
       September 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement
       accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
       and

(2)    information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       AT&T Corp.



Dated:  November 11, 2003

                                       /s/  Thomas W. Horton
                                       ---------------------------
                                       By:  Thomas W. Horton
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16420]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP00-391-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Petition

June 23, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 19, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company, (ANR) 
petitioned the Commission pursuant to Rule 207 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207 for authorization to 
reacquire certain firm transportation capacity that it has historically 
held on Viking Gas Transmission Company (Viking).
    In its Petition, ANR explained that the capacity at issue was 
released/assigned by ANR to its former sales customers at the direction 
of the Commission as part of the Order No. 636 restructuring process. 
ANR also advised that, although some of that Viking capacity is no 
longer desired by those customers, it is still required by ANR to 
ensure its ability to obtain flowing gas volumes in order to meet its 
existing firm service requirements in certain parties of western 
Wisconsin. ANR has requested that the Commission act on its Petition no 
later than September 1, 2000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before June 29, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16420 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16254]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3255]


State of New Mexico; (Amendment #1)

    In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency, dated June 9, 2000, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
on May 5, 2000 and continuing through June 9, 2000.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is July 12, 2000 and for 
economic injury the deadline is February 13, 2001.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: June 14, 2000.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-16254 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dinesh R. Desai,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Dinesh R. DesaiChief
      Executive OfficerApril
      14, 2010
#### § 105-70.031 Determining the amount of penalties and assessments.

In determining an appropriate amount of civil penalties and assessments, the ALJ and the Authority Head, upon appeal, should evaluate any circumstances presented that mitigate or aggravate the violation and should articulate in their opinions the reasons that support the penalties and assessments they impose.
§ 302-3.208 What relocation expenses will my agency pay for my overseas assignment and return? To determine what relocation expenses your agency will pay for your overseas assignment and return, see: ( a ) Section 302-3.2 if you are a new appointee; or
( b ) Section 302-3.101 if you are a transferred employee.
Original

No. 79-469

#### *In re*Petition of Ellen McHale (New Hampshire Board of Claims)

June 18, 1980

*Hall, Morse, Gallagher & Anderson,*of Concord (G. *Wells Anderson,*by brief), for the plaintiff.

*Gregory H. Smith,*acting attorney general *(Edward W. Stewart, Jr.,*assistant attorney general, by brief), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

This is a petition for original jurisdiction under Supreme Court Rule 11 regarding the granting of a motion to dismiss a claim pending before the State Board of Claims.

*451On September 25, 1979, the plaintiff filed a notice of claim arising out of a 1978 accident. The State filed a motion to dismiss the claim based upon the petitioner’s failure to provide notice within 180 days as required by RSA 541-B:14 IV (Supp. 1979). On December 7, 1979, the Board of Claims heard and granted the motion to dismiss. On December 21, 1979, the instant petition was filed in this court and on January 8, 1980, a “motion for reconsideration” was filed with the board.

RSA 541-B:10 IV (Supp. 1979) provides that the “findings and recommendations of the board” shall “only be subject to a judicial appeal... in accordance with RSA 541.” We have previously held that “the legislature has designated the RSA ch. 541 appeals procedure as the proper vehicle for challenges to judgments of the board of claims.” *Sousa v. State,*119 N.H. 283, 284, 401 A.2d 1067, 1068 (1979).

Under RSA 541:3 a motion for rehearing must be filed with the agency within twenty days “after any order or decision” or no appeal may betaken. RSA 541:4. Our Rule 11 procedures are not available to cure an appeal that is defective under RSA ch. 541. *See*Supreme Court Rule 10.

*Petition dismissed.*
No. 11-757.

#### Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L. P., et al. *v.*27001 Partnership et al.

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.
28 January 2016

389A15

#### State v. Tae Kwon Hammonds

1. Def’s Notice of Appeal Based upon a Dissent (COA15-53)

1.-

2. Def’s PDR As to Additional Issues

2. Allowed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

MICHAEL S. KLINGENSMITH, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

HONORABLE DEBRA A. PEZZE, JUDGE 

WESTMORELAND COUNTY, 

PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 97 WM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is GRANTED to the 

extent it seeks relief relative to the overdue transmittal of the record. 

The Superior Court has issued three orders directing the Court of Common Pleas 

of Westmoreland County to transmit the record relative to Petitioner’s pending appeal. 

See Commonwealth v. Klingensmith, 1120 WDA 2013 (orders dated 4/28/2014; 

11/05/2014; and 03/09/2015). The common pleas court has not complied. As such, the 

Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County is DIRECTED to transmit the record 

to the Superior Court within 15 days and provide notice to this Court of that transmittal. 

Jurisdiction is RETAINED pending receipt of the notice that transmittal has 

occurred. 

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption 

and to serve this order on both the President Judge of the Superior Court and the 

President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County. 

Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.