alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Joseph J. BouffardName:

Joseph J. BouffardTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Michael J. DeeName:

Michael J. DeeTitle:

Senior-Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer




Date: September 23, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16018]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

June 19, 2000.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 26, 2000 
to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1541.
    Revenue Procedure Number: Revenue Procedure 97-27.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Changes in Methods of Accounting.
    Description: The information requested in sections 6, 8, and 13 of 
Revenue Procedure 97-27 is required in order for the Commissioner to 
determine whether the taxpayer is properly requesting to change its 
method of accounting and the terms and conditions of that change.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Individuals or 
households, Not-for-profit institutions, Farms.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 3,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 3 hours, 13 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 9,633 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 
5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Mary A. Able,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-16018 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 50-204.23 Precautionary procedures and personnel monitoring. ( a ) Every employer shall make such surveys as may be necessary for him to comply with the provisions in this subpart. “Survey” means an evaluation of the radiation hazards incident to the production, use, release, disposal, or presence of radioactive materials or other sources of radiation under a specific set of conditions. When appropriate, such evaluation includes a physical survey of the location of materials and equipment, and measurements of levels of radiation or concentrations of radioactive material present.
( b ) Every employer shall supply appropriate personnel monitoring equipment, such as film badges, pocket chambers, pocket dosimeters, or film rings, to, and shall require the use of such equipment by: ( 1 ) Each employee who enters a restricted area under such circumstances that he receives, or is likely to receive, a dose in any calendar quarter in excess of 25 percent of the applicable value specified in paragraph (a) of § 50-204.21; and
( 2 ) Each employee under 18 years of age who enters a restricted area under such circumstances that he receives, or is likely to receive, a dose in any calendar quarter in excess of 5 percent of the applicable value specified in paragraph (a) of § 50-204.21; and
( 3 ) Each employee who enters a high radiation area.
( c ) As used in this subpart: ( 1 ) “Personnel monitoring equipment” means devices designed to be worn or carried by an individual for the purpose of measuring the dose received (e.g., film badges, pocket chambers, pocket dosimeters, film rings, etc.);
( 2 ) “Radiation area” means any area, accessible to personnel, in which there exists radiation at such levels that a major portion of the body could receive in any one hour a dose in excess of 5 millirem, or in any 5 consecutive days a dose in excess of 100 millirem; and
( 3 ) “High radiation area” means any area, accessible to personnel, in which there exists radiation at such levels that a major portion of the body could receive in any one hour a dose in excess of 100 millirem.
No. 11-8965.

#### Walls *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.335 Rulings.

Prompt notice, including a brief statement of the reasons therefor, will be given of the denial, in whole or in part, of a request for subpena or of a motion to quash.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 580 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 580

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply the capital gains 
   tax rates to capital gains earned by designated settlement funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply the capital gains 
   tax rates to capital gains earned by designated settlement funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPITAL GAINS TAX RATES APPLIED TO CAPITAL GAINS OF 
              DESIGNATED SETTLEMENT FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 468B(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to taxation of designated settlement 
funds) is amended by inserting ``(subject to section 1(h))'' after 
``maximum rate''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 102-75.1225 What details are provided in the “Notice of Availability”?

The “Notice of Availability” describes the physical characteristics of the property; it also provides information on location, hazards or restrictions, contact information, and a date by which an interested Federal agency must respond in writing to indicate a definite or potential need for the property.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**MOSSIMO, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Mossimo, Inc. (theCompany) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I Edwin Lewis, Vice-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

(1)         The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the Company.
| /s/ EDWIN LEWIS                            |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Edwin Lewis                                     |   |
| *Vice-Chairman and  Co-Chief Executive Officer* |   |
| March 31,  2005                            |   |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINALOF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THECOMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF UPONREQUEST.

THIS CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-K TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILEDWITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE INTO A FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THESECURITIES ACT OF 1934 (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-K),IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING.

----
Skip to NOAA Navigation

Skip to Main Content

Skip to Main Navigation

Skip to Topic Navigation

Skip to Search

        - NOAA HOME
        - WEATHER
        - OCEANS
        - FISHERIES
        - CHARTING
        - SATELLITES
        - CLIMATE
        - RESEARCH
        - COASTS
        - CAREERS

      - Program Services  Participants List  Publications  Training  Offices & Staff- Offices
- Staff
  Export Certification- Export Certification
- EU Exports  
- International Services
-  FAQs  
- Links  
-  

Email UsPay.GovOnline Request SystemHome

Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Skip to NOAA NavigationSkip to Main ContentSkip to Main NavigationSkip to Topic NavigationSkip to Search
**Effective immediately the main phone number for the Seafood Inspection Program is 301-427-8300**
**NOAA Inspection Manual 25**
Return to Table of Contents

**Chapter Two:  Policies and Procedures for Systems Audits**
- Purpose
- Scope
- Definitions
- Introduction
- Audit Scheduling
- Audit Team
- Auditor’s Responsibilities
- Lead Auditor’s       Responsibilities
- Independence of       the Auditor
- Client
- Auditee
- Audit       Objectives, Scope, and Criteria
- Audit       Feasibility
- Audit Frequency
- Selecting the       Audit Team
- Audit Plan
- Auditor Team       Assignments
- Working       Documents
- System Documentation       Review
- Opening Meeting
- Collecting       Objective Evidence
- Caucus
- Audit       Observations
- Record Review       Procedures
- End Product       Evaluation
- Closing Meeting       with Auditee
- Audit Report and       Completion
- Report Content
- Report       Distribution
- Record Retention
- Audit Completion
- Corrective Action and Follow-Up
- Audit Report    - Purpose
  - Scope
  - References
  - Introduction
  - Methodology
  - Findings
  - Observations
  - Summary and Conclusions
  - Corrective Action Request
  - Analytical Test Results
  - Histamine Analysis
  - Chiller Temperatures
  - Supplementsl Report               - Mnanagement Controls and Responsibilities
    - Food Safety and Management
    - Sanitation and Prerequisite Programs
    - Quality Management
    - Food Security
§ 0.551 Purpose and scope; definitions. ( a ) The purpose of this subpart is to implement the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552(a), and to protect the rights of the individual in the accuracy and privacy of information concerning him which is contained in Commission records. The regulations contained herein cover any group of records under the Commission's control from which information about individuals is retrievable by the name of an individual or by some other personal identifier.
( b ) In this subpart: ( 1 ) *Individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;
( 2 ) *Record* means any item, collection or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by the Commission, including but not limited to, such individual's education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history, and that contains such individual's name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or a photograph.
( 3 ) *System of Records* means a group of records under the control of the Commission from which information is retrievable by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual;
( 4 ) *Routine Use* means, with respect to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected;
( 5 ) *System Manager* means the Commission official responsible for the storage, maintenance, safekeeping, and disposal of a system of records.
(Secs. 4(i) and 303(n), Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 303(n); 47 CFR 0.231(d))
[40 FR 44512, Sept. 26, 1975, as amended at 49 FR 13368, Apr. 4, 1984]
No. 11-9.

#### Ramirez-Herrera *v.*Oregon.

Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7676

RICHARD LEE PUTMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FRANK CASSELL, Sheriff; THOMAS NELSON, Lieutenant; GAIL TAYLOR, Sergeant; PATSY DICKERSON, Nurse; MIKE HATCHER, Paramedic,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-97-549)

Submitted: April 20, 1999 Decided: May 21, 1999

Before ERVIN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Lee Putman, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Timothy Williams, WILLIAMS, MORRISON, LIGHT & MOREAU, Danville, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Lee Putman appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Putman v. Cassell, No. CR-97-549 (W.D. Va.

Oct. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
         the registrant's consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 1999
         and consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended
         September 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
         such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000006494
<NAME>                     ANDREA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          9,348,688
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,445,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                      202,251
<INVENTORY>                                     7,647,839
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               21,478,981
<PP&E>                                          2,715,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                    601,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 52,427,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,767,206
<BONDS>                                         1,477,616
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                     7,170,523
<COMMON>                                        6,621,269
<OTHER-SE>                                     32,155,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   52,427,449
<SALES>                                        13,314,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,314,312
<CGS>                                           9,244,906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   9,244,906
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,185,546
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (224,407)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,159,066)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,159,066)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,159,066)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.40)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.5 Preferred Certificate





Certificate

__________ Shares

No. A-_____







Incorporated in the State of Nevada

December 23, 1985




SIGMA LABS, INC.




SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK




(See the reverse of this certificate for information on how to obtain a copy of the

rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of each class or series of shares)













THIS CERTIFIES that __________________________________ is the record holder of _______________ shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of Sigma Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation, transferable only on the share register of the corporation, in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed or assigned.




This certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the corporation and any amendments thereto, to all of which the holder of this certificate by acceptance hereby assents.




WITNESS the signatures of its duly authorized officers this _____ day of _________, 201_. 










__________________________________________

____________________________________________

Mark J. Cola, President and Chief Executive Officer

Amanda Cole, Secretary
































THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL, OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS. SUCH REQUEST SHOULD BE MADE TO THE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION AT ITS PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OFFICE.
S89A0099.

#### YEARBY v. THE STATE.

(385 SE2d 414)

Decided October 5, 1989.

*Hudson & Montgomery, Kenneth Kaliuoda,*for appellant.

*Harry N. Gordon, District Attorney, Steve Jones, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Marshall, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Jerome Yearby, was indicted on one count of forgery in the first degree. In the indictment, the appellant was also charged with three recidivist counts, based on one prior conviction of aggravated assault and two prior convictions of burglary. He was found guilty on all counts. Under OCGA § 17-10-7 (b), which is known as the habitual-offender statute, he was given the maximum sentence for first-degree forgery, which is ten years’ imprisonment, without possibility of parole.

OCGA § 17-10-7 (b) generally provides that any person who, after having been convicted of three felonies, commits another felony other than a capital felony, must, upon conviction of the fourth or subsequent offense, “serve the maximum time provided in the sentence of the judge based upon such conviction and shall not be eligible for parole until the maximum sentence has been served.”

In this appeal, the appellant challenges the constitutionality of OCGA § 17-10-7 (b), arguing that this statutory provision unconstitutionally encroaches upon the power of the State Board of Pardons and Paroles to grant paroles under Art. IV, Sec. II, Par. II of the Georgia Constitution of 1983.

The constitutionality of the habitual-offender statute has been challenged on different grounds, and upheld by us, in *Knight v. State,*243 Ga. 770 (1) (257 SE2d 182) (1979). The constitutional challenge advanced by the appellant in this case was also asserted in *Kryder v. State,*212 Ga. 272 (2) (91 SE2d 612) (1956), and *Green v. State,*244 Ga. 755 (262 SE2d 68) (1979), and in both of those cases it was held that “the appellant was without standing to contest the statute until such time as he claimed a right of parole and the statute was asserted against him as a bar.” *Green v. State,*supra, 244 Ga. at 756.

Since, as in *Green,*there is no remaining issue which would invoke this court’s jurisdiction, the appeal is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeals.

*Transferred to the Court of Appeals.*

*All the Justices concur.*