alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 301-11.12 How does the type of lodging I select affect my reimbursement? ( a ) Your agency will reimburse you for different types of lodging as follows: ( 1 ) *Conventional lodgings (hotel/motel, boarding house, etc.).* You will be reimbursed the single occupancy rate.
( 2 ) *Government quarters.* You will be reimbursed, as a lodging expense, the fee or service charge you pay for use of the quarters.
( 3 ) *Lodging with friend(s) or relative(s) (with or without charge).* You may be reimbursed for additional costs your host incurs in accommodating you only if you are able to substantiate the costs and your agency determines them to be reasonable. You will not be reimbursed the cost of comparable conventional lodging in the area or a flat “token” amount.
( 4 ) *Nonconventional lodging.* You may be reimbursed the cost of other types of lodging when there are no conventional lodging facilities in the area (e.g., in remote areas) or when conventional facilities are in short supply because of an influx of attendees at a special event (e.g., World's Fair or international sporting event). Such lodging includes college dormitories or similar facilities or rooms not offered commercially but made available to the public by area residents in their homes.
( 5 ) *Recreational vehicle (trailer/camper).* You may be reimbursed for expenses (parking fees, fees for connection, use, and disconnection of utilities, electricity, gas, water and sewage, bath or shower fees, and dumping fees) which may be considered as a lodging cost.
( b ) Your agency will not reimburse you for: ( 1 ) *Personally-owned residence.* You will not be reimbursed for any lodging expenses for staying at your personally-owned residence or for any real estate expenses associated with the purchase or sale of a personal residence at the TDY location, except in conjunction with an authorized relocation pursuant to chapter 302 of this title.
( 2 ) *Personally-owned recreational vehicle (trailer/camper).* You will not be reimbursed any expenses associated with the purchase, sale or payment of a recreational vehicle or camper at the TDY location.
[76 FR 63845, Oct. 14, 2011]
#### § 102-82.35 Can Executive agencies enter into contracts for utility services?

Executive agencies, operating under a utility services delegation from GSA, or the Secretary of Defense, when the Secretary determines it to be in the best interests of national security, may enter into contracts for utility services (such as commodities and utility rebate programs), pursuant to the terms and conditions contained in the delegation and in accordance with FAR part 41. FAR part 41 requires that agencies provide or procure from sources of supply that are the most advantageous to the Federal Government in terms of economy, efficiency, reliability, or quality of service; while 40 U.S.C. 501(c) requires that agencies provide or procure such services with due regard to the mission responsibilities of the agencies concerned. For information on utility services delegation of authority refer to part 102-72 of this chapter. For additional information on contracts for utility services, search on the topics Utility or Energy on the Acquisition Gateway, *http://www.gsa.gov*.
#### § 109-28.5005 EHFFP program review.

OPMOs or on-site DOE property administrators shall conduct periodic reviews in accordance 109-1.5110 Physical inventories of personal property frequency requirement to ensure that the EHFFP program is being conducted in accordance with established procedures DOE-FMR. Included in the review will be proper determinations of property as EHFFP, the validity of justifications for retaining EHFFP.
#### § 102-75.665 What happens after the disposal agency receives the assignment recommendation from DOI?

If, after considering other uses for the property, the disposal agency approves the assignment recommendation from DOI, it must assign the property by letter or other document to the Secretary of the Interior. The disposal agency must furnish to the landholding agency a copy of the assignment, unless the landholding agency is also the disposal agency. If the recommendation is disapproved, the disposal agency must likewise notify the Secretary.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-15-000377- CV The City of L eander; K ent Cagle, Individ ually an d in his O ff icial Capacity as City Managerof the City of L eander; and Thomas Yantis, Indi vidu ally and in h is Of fi cial Capacity as Assistant City Managerand Planni ng Direct or for the City of Leander, Appellan ts v. P rem as Global Leander I, LLC, App ellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 277 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 15- 0088 -C27 7, H ONO RAB LE STACEY MATH EWS, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The appellee has filed an ag ree d motion to dismiss this appea l. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field Dismissed on Ag ree d Motion Filed: September

18, 2015
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40474

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS MARTINEZ-IBARRA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CR-510

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus MartinezIbarra has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Ibarra has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40474 Document: 00513273063 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/16/2015
No. 15-40474

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40474 Document: 00513273063 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/16/2015
T he Federal Emergency Management 

Agency (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation 

Assistance (HMA) grant programs 

provide funding for eligible mitigation activities 

that reduce disaster losses and protect life and 

property from future disaster damages. For 

example, a HMA grant was used in a Kentucky 

community to add stream gauges and identify 

response actions that would be followed to 

remove the contents of homes and businesses 

to safe places prior to a flood. 

Grants to enhance community flood warning 

capabilities must meet the requirements of the 

National Flood Insurance Program's 

Community Rating System. In addition, the 

proposal must match the kinds of eligible 

projects listed in their state and local government approved mitigation plan. A listing of 

State Hazard Mitigation Officers is available 

at: www.fema.gov/about/contact/shmo.shtn 

For more information on the HMA grant 

program, go to: 

www.fema.gov/governrnent/grantlhmal 

index.shtm 
A re you prepared if too much water falls on 

or flows into your community? What flood 

protection options are available to your 

community? 

It floods nearly every day somewhere in 

America. Community leaders need to be aware 

of flood risk that can be caused by excessive 

rain, tropical storms, dam breaks, rapid snow 

melt, or ice jams. One way emergency officials 

can take positive steps to save lives and 

property is by implementing a Local Flood 

Warning System. 

H ydrologic data from a Local Flood Warning System (LFWS) provides real-time 

information to help make many important 

decisions including prepositioning of resources, 

=locating expensive property, evacuating or 

sheltering-in place residents at risk, and closing 

flood-prone roads before a disaster happens. 

Increasingly, federal, state, and local agencies 

are investing in cost-effective hydrologic 

monitoring equipment that helps provide early 

warning for floods. These systems have additional benefits providing useful data for fire and 

water management and other environmental 

applications. 

A well-designed LFWS includes: 

Instruments and communications 

technologies that monitor and report changes 

in the environment in real-time. (Modem 

systems may even Include automated signs 

and barriers.) 

Analysis and forecasting components for 

rapid decision-making. 

-- -- L/14 

Hective tools for warning outreach a'- . 

communication with local, Reedy, combined -> 

emergency managers and - \ w$h ~LWS, is a sun way community leaders 

Routine training and 6an be better pmpamd to save lives and 

development to kee Property- ( 

The NWS offers useful 

implementing, and 

Systems Manual 

042curr.pdf 

As a trusted leader in 

community, the NHW 

The NWS StorrnR design, implementation, v, and use 

America's communi of U-WS. In addition, the NHWC offers networking opporfunities for community 

public safety afficials, and emrkonmek
§ 102-73.170 What types of special purpose space may the Department of Agriculture lease? The Department of Agriculture is delegated the authority to lease the following types of special purpose space: ( a ) Cotton classing laboratories (lease terms, including all options, limited to 5 years).
( b ) Land (if unimproved, may be leased only on a fiscal year basis).
( c ) Miscellaneous storage by cubic foot or weight basis.
( d ) Office space when required to be located in or adjacent to stockyards, produce markets, produce terminals, airports, and other ports (lease terms, including all options, limited to 5 years).
( e ) Space for agricultural commodities stored in licensed warehouses and utilized under warehouse contracts.
( f ) Space utilized in cooperation with State and local governments or their instrumentalities (extension services) where the cooperating State or local government occupies a portion of the space and pays a portion of the rent.
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of NICE-Systems Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Ran Oz,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

June 13, 2007

| |  | /s/ Ran Oz
Ran Oz, Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------



---

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40830 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESSE WADE HALE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CR-42-3

-------------------- August 24, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The court-appointed counsel for Jesse Wade Hale has moved for leave to withdraw and filed a motion and brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hale has not filed a response to the instant motion. Our independent review of the motion, brief, and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Searched for **http://www.ssa.gov/international/Agreement_Pamphlets/luxmburg.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.ssa.gov/international/Agreement_Pamphlets/luxmburg.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Mountain Province
Diamonds Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Elizabeth J. Kirkwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date: June 27, 2005

| | /s/ Elizabeth J.
      KirkwoodName:
      Elizabeth J. KirkwoodTitle: Chief Financial
  Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Jennifer Dawson, Chief
Financial Officer of Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Annual Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:    | /s/ Jennifer Dawson    
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Jennifer Dawson        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | April 1, 2013          



This written statement is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of
this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this
Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37, 314]

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Shell Chemical Company, Point Pleasant Polyester Plant, Apple Grove, West Virginia. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-37, 314; Shell Chemical Company, Point Pleasant Polyester Plant, Apple Grove, West Virginia (June 12, 2000).

Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of June, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-16502  Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
No. 11-220.

#### Liggins *v.*Bouffault et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 8, 2011 

p0228 

Order 

 

March 8, 2011 

141993 

POLY BOND, INC. and ROBERT LAFAVE, 

Individually and on behalf of LAMINATE 

PRODUCTS, INC. and BOLA SYSTEMS, INC., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 141993 

 COA: 290429 

Tuscola CC: 07-024023-CK 

JEN-TECH CORPORATION, d/b/a JEN-LAY, 

and ROBERT BOWLING, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

LAMINATE PRODUCTS, INC. and BOLA 

SYSTEMS, INC., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 102-75.780 When must DOJ or FEMA notify the disposal agency that an eligible applicant is interested in acquiring the property?

OJP or FEMA must notify the disposal agency within 30 calendar days after the date of the surplus notice, if there is an eligible applicant interested in acquiring the property. After that 30-calendar day period expires, OJP or FEMA then has another 30 days to review and approve an appropriate program and notify the disposal agency of the need for the property. If no application is approved, then OJP or FEMA must notify the disposal agency that there is no requirement for the property within the 30-calendar day period allotted for review and approval.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 15, 2000, Celgene Corporation, 7 Powder Horn Drive, Warren, New Jersey 07059, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of methylphenidate (1724) a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.

The firm plans to manufacture methylphenidate for product research and development.

Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with  DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration.

Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than August 25, 2000.

Dated: June 14, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-15986  Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Searched for **http://www.acus.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.acus.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.