alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 705 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 705

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To make technical corrections with respect to the monthly reports 
 submitted by the Postmaster General on official mail of the House of 
                            Representatives.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 705

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To make technical corrections with respect to the monthly reports 
 submitted by the Postmaster General on official mail of the House of 
                            Representatives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS REGARDING REPORTS BY POSTMASTER 
              GENERAL ON OFFICIAL MAIL OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

    (a) In General.--Section 311(b)(2) of the Legislative Branch 
Appropriations Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C. 59e(b)(2)) is amended by striking 
``any person with an allocation under subsection (a)(2)'' and inserting 
the following: ``any person with an allocation under subsection 
(a)(2)(A) as to the amount that has been used and any person with an 
allocation under subsection (a)(2)(B)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to January 1999 and each succeeding month.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 11, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE BRANDS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ALBAAD MASSUOT YITZHAK, LTD., ALBAAD USA, 

INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2018-1890

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:15-cv-01188-KAJ, Circuit 

Judge Kent A. Jordan.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

JASON C. KRAVITZ, Nixon Peabody LLP, Boston, MA, 

argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by LESLIE 

HARTFORD; DANIEL J. BURNHAM, MATTHEW A. WERBER, 

Chicago, IL. 

 DAVID A. LOEWENSTEIN, Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer 

LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees. Also 

represented by CLYDE SHUMAN, GUY YONAY. 

______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LINN and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 July 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                          $11,361,448
<SECURITIES>                                     18,597,237
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7,085,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                         13,000
<INVENTORY>                                       8,920,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 46,339,681
<PP&E>                                           33,418,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (25,505,085)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   54,428,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,048,854
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             65,472
<OTHER-SE>                                       48,755,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     54,428,061
<SALES>                                          33,368,015
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 33,368,015
<CGS>                                            20,180,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    27,707,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   28,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6,649,459
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,328,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4,321,459
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4,321,459
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.75
                                                    
                                               

</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 19, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01016-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF S.E.F., A.F., T.R.F. AND O.D.F., CHILDREN 

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 429-56599-2016 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

The filing fee, clerk’s record, and reporter’s record in this case are past due. By postcard 

dated September 5, 2018, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant 

to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would 

result in dismissal of the appeal. By postcard dated October 26, 2018, we notified appellant a 

second time that the filing fee had not been paid and instructed appellant to pay the filing fee or 

risk dismissal of the appeal without further notice. 

The record was due December 1, 2018. The Collin County District Clerk and the court 

reporter both informed this Court in writing that payment had not been made nor had arrangements 

to pay been made for either the clerk’s record or the reporter’s record. In light of this, we notified 

appellant on December 3, 2018 that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not 

paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. On December 5, 2018, we notified 

appellant that the reporter’s record had not been filed due to the failure to pay or make 
 –2– 

arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of 

payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and reporter’s record or to provide written 

documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten 

days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal 

without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required 

documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 

181019F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF S.E.F., A.F., 

T.R.F. AND O.D.F., CHILDREN 

No. 05-18-01016-CV 

 On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 429-56599-2016. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Evans and Brown participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

 We ORDER that appellee, Oran Daniel Fought III recover his costs, if any, of this appeal 

from appellant Karen Lynn Whitten f/k/a Karen Lynn Fought. 

Judgment entered December 19, 2018.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 779 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 779

  To require the allocation of certain surface transportation program 
             funds for the purchase of recycled materials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 23, 1999

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the allocation of certain surface transportation program 
             funds for the purchase of recycled materials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. ALLOCATION OF SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FUNDS FOR THE 
              PURCHASE OF RECYCLED MATERIALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 133(d) of title 23, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) For purchase of recycled materials.--10 percent of 
        the funds apportioned to a State under section 104(b)(3) for 
        the surface transportation program for a fiscal year shall only 
        be available for the purchase of recycled materials.''.
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue regulations to 
carry out the amendment made by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 301-10.301 How do I compute my mileage reimbursement?

You compute mileage reimbursement by multiplying the distance traveled, determined under § 301-10.302 of this subpart by the applicable mileage rate.

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15955, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2010-07, 75 FR 72967, Nov. 29, 2010]
§ 5.36 Loan of vessels, aircraft, radio stations, motorized vehicles, trailers, or other equipment to the Coast Guard. ( a ) A vessel, aircraft, radio station, motorized vehicle, trailer, or other equipment may be loaned to the Coast Guard for a specific period, and must be returned at the expiration of that period, unless circumstances or an emergency make the return impracticable at that time. The Commandant will determine the method, time, and documents to be exchanged upon the return to the owner of any facility. The property will be re-inventoried as of the time, date, and place of re-delivery, and mutually settled by the owner and the Coast Guard representative. If the vessel, aircraft, radio station, motorized vehicle, trailer, or other equipment was accepted during an emergency, any claim for lost equipment or stores must be supported by invoices showing the date of purchase and the cost thereof by the person submitting the claim. The Coast Guard representative will take all proper precautions to protect the owner's interest, as well as that of the United States.
( b ) Except as permitted in paragraph (c) of this section, no vessel, aircraft, radio station, motorized vehicle, trailer, or other equipment will be deemed loaned to the Coast Guard until an acceptance, on the prescribed form, has been signed on behalf of the Coast Guard by a person authorized by the Commandant to sign such an acceptance and a complete inventory of consumable and expendable stores and equipment has been made and mutually settled by the owner and the Coast Guard representative.
( c ) In an emergency, a vessel, aircraft, radio station, motorized vehicle, trailer, or other equipment may be loaned to Coast Guard without an inventory or the use of the prescribed form.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for licenses as Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 515). 

Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 20573. 

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants: 

F.M.I. Cargo Shipping, Inc., 1022 W. Irving Park Road, Bensenville, IL 60106. Officers: Felix Wong, Secretary (Qualifying Individual); Wai-Fan Yeung, President.

DVN Carriers, LP, 6802 Mapleridge Street, Suite 207, Bellaire, TX 77401. Officers: C. Rider Griswold, Managing Partner; Madelaine Griswold, Partner. 

Jenkar International Freight Ltd., 150-30 132nd Avenue, Jamaica, NY 11434. Officers: Donald James Wolfe, Director (Qualifying Individual).

Ocean Freight Forwarders—Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants: 

Farris Customs Brokers, Inc., 13591 McGregor Bl., Suite 20, Fort Myers, FL 33912. Officers: Donald G. Farris, Sr., Vice President (Qualifying Individual); Carolyn D. Wilmot, President.

Cargomar Overseas, Inc., 1325 N.W. 78 Avenue, Suite 100, Miami, FL 33126. Officer: Atilio C. Fernandez, President (Qualifying Individual). 

Ohlson International Logistics Incorporated, 960 Lunt Avenue, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007. Officers: Michael J. Ohlson, President (Qualifying Individual); Joseph Calabria, Vice President. 

Dated: June 23, 2000.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-16388 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 848

AN ACT

For the relief of Sepandan Farnia and Farbod

Farnia.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 848

AN ACT

For the relief of Sepandan Farnia and Farbod Farnia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 848 EH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR

2 SEPANDAN FARNIA AND FARBOD FARNIA.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

4 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

5 Act, Sepandan Farnia and Farbod Farnia shall each be

6 eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjust7 ment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for

8 permanent residence upon filing an application for

9 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such

10 Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resi11 dent.

12 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Sepandan Farnia

13 or Farbod Farnia enters the United States before the fil14 ing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be consid15 ered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if

16 otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status

17 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

18 as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

19 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

20 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap21 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica22 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

23 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

24 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

25 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res26 idence to Sepandan Farnia and Farbod Farnia, the Sec-
3

•HR 848 EH

1 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce

2 by two, during the current or next following fiscal year,

3 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail4 able to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under

5 section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or,

6 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are

7 made available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth

8 under section 202(e) of such Act.

Passed the House of Representatives October 3,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Comments on: 18-1890: EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE BRANDS v. ALBAAD MASSUOT YITZHAK, LTD. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00708-CR

Jonathan MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023CR3418

Honorable Kristina Escalona, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 27, 2023

DISMISSED

Appellant Jonathan Martinez entered into a plea bargain with the State pursuant to which 

he pleaded nolo contendere to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The trial court imposed 

sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant filed a 

notice of appeal, and the district clerk filed a copy of the clerk’s record, which includes the trial 

court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement. See id. R. 25.2(d). We 
04-23-00708-CR

- 2 -

must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not 

been made part of the record.” Id. 

Here, the clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the trial court does not 

exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. R. 

25.2(a)(2). The record also supports the trial court’s certification that appellant does not have a 

right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that 

court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certificate is 

accurate).

On August 11, 2023, we ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 

25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that appellant has the right to appeal 

was made part of the appellate record by September 11, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; 

see also Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 

2003, no pet.). Neither an amended certification nor other response has been filed. We therefore 

dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
No. 11-81.

#### Gerhart *v.*Lake County, Montana, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32








Certification of Chief Executive Officer


and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Roger S. Marcus, Chief Executive Officer, and Howard N. Feist III, Chief Financial Officer, of American Biltrite Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of the Company as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  May 17, 2010


/s/ Roger S. Marcus


Roger S. Marcus


Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Howard N. Feist III


Howard N. Feist III


Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Unconventional Nuclear Warfare Defense will meet in closed session on July 10-11, 2000, at Strategic  Analysis, Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500, Arlington, VA. This Task Force will determine the adequacy of DoD's ability to detect, identify, respond, and prevent unconventional nuclear attacks by terrorists or subnational entities, and the appropriate role(s) and capability of DoD to provide protection against unconventional nuclear attacks in support of homeland defense.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will review and evaluate the Department's ability to provide information

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings, concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. § 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly these meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: June 22, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-16577  Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M