### 32474 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: May 20, 2015. William C. Early, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

**PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF**  **IMPLEMENTATION PLANS**

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. **Subpart V—Maryland**

■ 2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the entries for COMAR 26.11.09.01, 26.11.09.04, 26.11.09.06, 26.11.09.07, and 26.11.09.09, and adding entries for COMAR 26.11.09.10 and 26.11.09.12 in numerical order to read as follows:

**§ 52.1070 Identification of plan.**
* * * * *

(c) * * *



### EPA-A PPROVED 

### R EGULATIONS 

### , T ECHNICAL 

### M EMORANDA



### , AND 

### STATUTES IN THE 

### M ARYLAND 

### SIP

Code of Maryland Administrative Regulations (COMAR)

citation Title/Subject State effective

date EPA approval date Additional explanation/ citation at 40 CFR 52.1100

******* 26.11.09.01 ....... Definitions ....................................... 04/28/14 6/9/15 [ Insert Federal Register citation ]. Definition of ‘‘biomass’’ is added.

******* 26.11.09.04 ....... Prohibition of Certain New Fuel Burning Equipment. 04/28/14 6/9/15 [ Insert Federal Register citation ]. Revised (C)(1).

******* 26.11.09.06 ....... Control of Particulate Matter .......... 04/28/14 6/9/15 [ Insert Federal Register citation ]. Revised (D)(1) and (D)(2).

26.11.09.07 ....... Control of Sulfur Oxides from Fuel Burning Equipment. 04/28/14 6/9/15 [ Insert Federal Register citation ]. Revised (B)(5).

******* 26.11.09.09 ....... Tables and Diagrams ..................... 4/28/14 6/9/15 [ Insert Federal Register citation ]. Amended incorrect reference.

26.11.09.10 ....... Requirements to Burn Used Oil and Waste Combustible Fluid as Fuel. 04/28/14 6/9/15 [ Insert Federal Register citation ]. New regulation.

26.11.09.12 ....... Standards for Biomass Fuel-Burning Equipment Equal to or Greater Than 350,000 Btu/hr. 04/28/14 6/9/15 [ Insert Federal Register citation ]. New regulation.

*******

* * * * * [FR Doc. 2015–13425 Filed 6–8–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Parts 52, 62, and 81**

**[EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0311]; FRL–9928– 68–Region 3]** 

**Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;**  **Pennsylvania; 2011 Lead Base Year Emissions Inventory** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Direct final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania) State Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA is proposing to approve the 2011 base year emissions inventory SIP revision submittal for the 2008 lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The base year emissions inventory SIP revision was submitted by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) on February 9, 2015 to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the Lyons 2008 lead NAAQS nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Lyons Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’). EPA is approving this revision to the Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with the requirements of the CAA.

**DATES :**  This rule is effective on August 10, 2015 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by July 9, 2015. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA– R03–OAR–2015–0311 by one of the following methods:

A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.

B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0311, Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such


### 32475 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

deliveries are only accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2015– 0311. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change, and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI, or otherwise protected, through www.regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the SIP submittal are available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
17105. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ellen Schmitt, (215) 814–5787, or by email at schmitt.ellen@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Background

On November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964), EPA revised the lead NAAQS, lowering the level from 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter (mg/m 3 ) to 0.15 mg/m 3 calculated over a three-month rolling average. EPA established the NAAQS based on significant evidence and numerous health studies demonstrating that serious health effects are associated with exposures to lead emissions.

Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, EPA is required by the CAA to designate areas throughout the United States as attaining or not attaining the NAAQS; this designation process is described in section 107(d)(1) of the CAA. On November 22, 2010 (75 FR 71033), EPA promulgated initial air quality designations for the 2008 lead NAAQS, which became effective on December 31, 2010, based on air quality monitoring data for calendar years 2007–2009, where there was sufficient data to support a nonattainment designation. Designations for all remaining areas were completed on November 22, 2011, based on air quality monitoring data for calendar years 2008–2010. Effective December 31, 2010, the Lyons Area was designated as nonattainment for the 2008 lead NAAQS. This designation triggered a requirement for Pennsylvania to submit a SIP revision with a plan for how the Lyons Area would attain the 2008 lead NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than December 31, 2015.

Designation of an area as nonattainment starts the process for a state to develop and submit to EPA a SIP revision under title I, part D of the CAA. This SIP revision must include, among other elements, a demonstration of how the NAAQS will be attained in the nonattainment area as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than the date required by the CAA, together with a base year emissions inventory, reasonably available control measures (RACM), a reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, and contingency measures for failure to meet RFP and attainment deadlines. Under CAA section 172(b), a state has up to three years after an area’s designation as nonattainment to submit its SIP revision to EPA.

On December 29, 2014 (79 FR 77911), EPA took final action to determine that the Lyons Area (comprised of Kutztown Borough, Lyon Borough, Maxatawny Township, and Richmond Township) has ambient air quality monitoring data that shows the Area meets the 2008 lead NAAQS. This clean data determination was based upon quality assured, quality controlled and certified ambient air monitoring data that shows the Area has monitored attainment of the 2008 lead NAAQS based on the calendar years 2009–2011 data. Pursuant to EPA’s Clean Data Policy, once EPA finalizes a clean data determination, the requirements for the Area to submit an attainment demonstration, RACM, a RFP plan, and contingency measures for failure to meet RFP and attainment deadlines are suspended for so long as the Area continues to attain the 2008 lead NAAQS.

Since 1995, EPA has applied its interpretation under the Clean Data Policy in many rulemakings, suspending certain attainment-related planning requirements for individual areas, based on a determination of attainment. However, EPA notes that a final determination of attainment does not suspend requirements not related to attaining the NAAQS, such as the emissions inventory requirement found in CAA section 172(c)(3), which requires submission and approval of an inventory of actual emissions of lead from all sources in the nonattainment area (i.e., base year emissions inventory).

On February 9, 2015, Pennsylvania submitted a formal revision to its SIP that consists of the lead base year emissions inventory for the Lyons Area for the 2008 lead NAAQS.
II. Emissions Inventory Requirements

States are required under section 172(c)(3) of the CAA to develop comprehensive, accurate and current emissions inventories of all sources of the relevant pollutant or pollutants in the nonattainment area. These inventories provide a detailed accounting of all emissions and emission sources by precursor or pollutant. In the November 12, 2008 lead NAAQS rulemaking, EPA finalized the guidance related to the emissions inventories requirements. The current regulations are located at 40 CFR 51.117(e), and include, but are not limited to, the following requirements:

• States must develop and periodically update a comprehensive, accurate, current inventory of actual emissions from all sources affecting ambient lead concentrations;

• The SIP inventory must be approved by EPA as a SIP element and is subject to public hearing requirements; and

• The point source inventory upon which the summary of the baseline for lead emissions inventory is based must


### 32476 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

1 See EPA document titled ‘‘Addendum to the 2008 Lead NAAQS Implementation Questions and Answers’’ dated August 10, 2012, which is included in EPA’s SIP Toolkit located at http://www.epa.gov/ air/lead/kitmodel.html.

2 Id. contain all sources that emit 0.5 or more tons of lead per year.

For the base-year inventory of actual lead emissions, EPA recommends using either 2010 or 2011 as the base year for the contingency measure calculations, but does provide flexibility for using other inventory years if states can show another year is more appropriate. 1 For lead SIPs, the CAA requires that all sources of lead emissions in the nonattainment area must be submitted with the base-year inventory. In today’s action, EPA is approving the base year emissions inventory SIP revision submitted by Pennsylvania on February 9, 2015, (hereinafter also referred to as ‘‘Pennsylvania’s submission’’) as required by section 172(c)(3). III. EPA Analysis of the Lyons 2011 Lead Base Year Emissions Inventory

EPA guidance for emissions inventory development provides that actual emissions should be used for purposes of the base year inventory. 2 On February 9, 2015, Pennsylvania submitted to EPA the 2011 base year emissions inventory for the lead point sources located within the Lyons Area. The Lyons Area has the following point sources of lead emissions: East Penn Manufacturing Company’s Richmond Township Facility; East Penn Manufacturing Company’s Kutztown Facility; and McConway & Torley Kutztown Foundry. PADEP requires larger emitting facilities to report production figures and emission calculations annually. Throughput data are multiplied by emission factors based on source classification codes (SCC) to develop emission estimates.

PADEP submitted EPA’s 2011 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) v2 data for nonpoint source lead emissions. The nonpoint source values for the Lyons Area were calculated using Berks County data apportioned by population, of which 4.1 percent (%) is included in the Lyons Area. EPA reviewed the results, procedures, and methodologies for Pennsylvania’s submission and found them to be reasonable for calculating the lead base year inventory for CAA section 172(c)(3) and in accordance with 40 CFR 51.117(e). A more detailed description of the SIP submittal and EPA’s evaluation is included in a Technical Support Document (TSD) prepared in support of this rulemaking action. A copy of the TSD is available, upon request, from the EPA Regional Office listed in the

**ADDRESSES** section of this document or is also available electronically within the Docket for this rulemaking action.

IV. Final Action

EPA is approving Pennsylvania’s submission consisting of the base year emissions inventory for the Lyons Area for the 2008 lead NAAQS. EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because EPA views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comment. However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s Federal Register , EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed. This rule will be effective on August 10, 2015 without further notice unless EPA receives adverse comment by July 9, 2015. If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. General Requirements

Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

• does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. );

• is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. );

• does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);

• does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

• is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

• is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

• is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and

• does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register

. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). C. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 10, 2015. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it


### 32477 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today’s Federal Register , rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking action. This action to approve Pennsylvania’s base year emissions inventory for the Lyons Area may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, and Lead.

Dated: May 20, 2015. William C. Early, Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III.

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

**PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF**  **IMPLEMENTATION PLANS**

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

**Subpart NN—Pennsylvania**

■ 2. Section 52.2036 is amended by adding paragraph (v) to read as follows:

**§ 52.2036 Base year emissions inventory.**

* * * * *

(v) EPA approves as a revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan the 2011 base year lead emission inventory for the Lyons, Pennsylvania nonattainment area for the 2008 lead NAAQS. This SIP revision was submitted by the Acting Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, on February 9, 2015. This submittal consists of the 2011 base year inventories for all relevant sources in the Lyons, Pennsylvania nonattainment area for the pollutant lead (Pb).

[FR Doc. 2015–13945 Filed 6–8–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND**  **HUMAN SERVICES**

**45 CFR Part 170**

**Acceptance and Approval of Non Governmental Developed Test**  **Procedures, Test Tools, and Test Data for Use Under the ONC Health IT**  **Certification Program**

**AGENCY :**  Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Department of Health and Human Services.

**ACTION :**  Reissuance.

**SUMMARY :**  This document further informs the public of ONC’s policy that permits any person or entity to submit test procedures, test tools, and test data for approval and use under the ONC Health IT Certification Program.

**DATES :**  Reissued June 9, 2015.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Alicia Morton, Director, ONC Health IT Certification Program, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, 202–549–7851.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On January 7, 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a final rule establishing a permanent certification program for the purposes of testing and certifying health information technology (‘‘Establishment of the Permanent Certification Program for Health Information Technology,’’ 76 FR 1262) (‘‘Permanent Certification Program final rule’’). The permanent certification program was renamed the ‘‘ONC HIT Certification Program’’ in a final rule published on September 4, 2012 (77 FR 54163) (‘‘2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria final rule’’). In the proposed rule entitled ‘‘2015 Edition Health Information Technology (Health IT) Certification Criteria, 2015 Edition Base Electronic Health Record (EHR) Definition, and ONC Health IT Certification Program Modifications’’ (80 FR 16804, 16806), we propose to further rename the program as the ‘‘ONC Health IT Certification Program.’’

In the preamble of the Permanent Certification Program final rule, we stated that a person or entity may submit a test procedure or test tool (to note, which includes any associated test data) to the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (the National Coordinator) to be considered for approval and use by NVLAP accredited testing laboratories. ‘‘The submission should identify the developer of the test tool and/or test procedure; specify the certification criterion or criteria that is/are addressed by the test tool and/or test procedure; and explain how the test tool and/or test procedure would evaluate a Complete EHR’s, EHR Module’s, or if the applicable, and other type of HIT’s compliance with the applicable certification criterion or criteria. The submission should also provide information describing the process used to develop the test tool and/or test procedure, including any opportunity for the public to comment on the test tool and/or test procedure and the degree to which public comments were considered.’’ (76 FR 1280) We also stated that ‘‘[i]n determining whether to approve a test tool and/or test procedure for purposes of the permanent certification program, the National Coordinator will consider whether it is clearly traceable to a certification criterion or criteria adopted by the Secretary; whether it is sufficiently comprehensive (i.e., assesses allrequired capabilities) for NVLAPaccredited testing laboratories to use in testing a Complete EHR’s, EHR Module’s, or other type of HIT’s compliance with the certification criterion or criteria adopted by the Secretary; whether an appropriate public comment process was used during the development of the test tool and/or test procedure; and any other relevant factors.’’ (76 FR 1280)

During the time in which the ONC Health IT Certification Program has operated, health IT developers have suggested that testing efficiencies could be achieved if the ONC Health IT Certification Program were to leverage operational testing and certification, such as the ePrescribing (eRX) network testing (and certification). As indicated by the previously recited ONC policy, the National Coordinator is open to approving test procedures, test tools, and test data that meet the outlined approval requirements above for an applicable adopted certification criterion or criteria. By way of this document, we strongly encourage persons or entities to submit such test procedures, test tools, and test data to ONC if they believe such procedures, tools, and data could be used to meet ONC’s certification criteria and testing approval requirements. We also note that there is no programmatic prohibition on the approval of multiple test procedures, test tools, and test data for a certification criterion or criteria.

Dated: May 21, 2015. Alicia Morton, Director, ONC Health IT Certification Program, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2015–13510 Filed 6–8–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4150–45–P**