alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SHOCKWAVE MEDICAL, INC.,

Appellant

v.

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellee

ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE 

FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER 

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF 

THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK 

OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________ 

2020-2314

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-

00408.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DAVID C. MCPHIE, Irell & Manella LLP, Newport 

Beach, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

Case: 20-2314 Document: 57 Page: 1 Filed: 01/18/2022
STEPHEN PAYNE; MICHAEL RICHARD FLEMING, Los Angeles, 

CA, WILLIAM ALCIATI, GREG GARDELLA, Gardella Grace PA, 

Washington, DC. 

 MARK CHRISTOPHER NELSON, Barnes & Thornburg 

LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by 

JUANITA DELOACH; JEFFREY STONE, Minneapolis, MN. 

 BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for 

intervenor. Also represented by MARY L. KELLY, THOMAS 

W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

January 18, 2022

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-2314 Document: 57 Page: 2 Filed: 01/18/2022
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4396 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4396

   To amend section 203 of the National Housing Act to increase the 
  maximum mortgage amount limitation under the single family housing 
   mortgage insurance program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
              Development for homes in nonhigh-cost areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 1994

 Mr. Taylor of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 203 of the National Housing Act to increase the 
  maximum mortgage amount limitation under the single family housing 
   mortgage insurance program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
              Development for homes in nonhigh-cost areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FHA Mortgage Upgrade Act''.

SEC. 2. MAXIMUM DOLLAR AMOUNT LIMITATION.

    Subparagraph (A) of the first sentence of section 203(b)(2) of the 
National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1709(b)(2)(A)) is amended by striking 
``the dollar amount limitation in effect under this section for the 
area on May 12, 1992'' and inserting the following: ``$100,000 in the 
case of property upon which there is located a dwelling designed 
principally for a 1-family residence, $112,600 in the case of a 2-
family residence, $136,300 in the case of a 3-family residence, 
$158,500 in the case of 4-family residence''.

                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN RE COMPLAINT NOS. 

F-08-90001, F-08-90002, F-08-90003, and F-08-90004 

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge. 

ORDER 

AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM

 A document including complaints of judicial misconduct was received by the 

court on August 4, 2008. The complaints concern a magistrate judge and three district 

court judges who hold office within the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fourth Circuit. 

 Pursuant to Rule 7(a)(1) of the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability 

Proceedings, a complaint against a magistrate judge or district court judge "must be 

filed with the circuit clerk in the jurisdiction in which the subject judge holds office." If 

the complaint alleges misconduct in the course of official business while the subject 

judge was sitting on a court by designation, then the complaint may be filed either with 

the circuit clerk in the jurisdiction in which the subject judge sat by designation or with 

the circuit clerk in the jurisdiction in which the subject judge holds office. Rule 7(b) of 

the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings. 

 The complainant does not assert that the subject judges sat by designation with 

the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Instead, the complaints 

concern a magistrate judge and district court judges who hold office within the 

jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Thus, the 

complaints were filed in the wrong circuit. Pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(F) of the Rules for 

Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings, a complaint "must be dismissed in 
F-08-90001, F-08-90002, 

F-08-90003, F-08-90004 

2

whole or in part to the extent that the chief judge concludes that the complaint . . . has 

been filed in the wrong circuit under Rule 7 . . . ." 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The complaints are dismissed pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(F) of the Rules for 

Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings. 

 August 15, 2008 /s/ Paul R. Michel 

 Date Paul R. Michel 

 Chief Judge 

 There is a right to file a petition for review of this order. Pursuant to Rule 18(b) of 

the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings, any petition for 

review must be received by the circuit executive within 35 days of the date of the letter 

transmitting this order. Any petition must be sent to: 

Circuit Executive 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

717 Madison Place, NW 

Washington, DC 20439
Exhibit 32(b)
 
 
 This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
 
 
 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
 of Title 18 of the United States Code
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian X. Tierney, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Brian X. Tierney
 Brian X. Tierney
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 April 30, 2010
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
151P14-3

#### Kimberly Shreve v. North Carolina Department of Justice, Kristen Fetter, Colon Willoughby, and Tina Hoagland Byrd

1. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint

1. Dismissed

2. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for Review and Appeal

2. Dismissed

3. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint

3. Dismissed
# Comments on: 2020-1307: cxLoyalty, Inc. v. Maritz Holdings Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
        THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
        EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED BALANCE SHEET OF ESC
        MEDICAL SYSTEMS LTD. AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
        DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED
        STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
        31, 1999 AND DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
        ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
        STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                            <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1999         DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                             24,524              42,950
<SECURITIES>                       43,841              46,867
<RECEIVABLES>                      68,792              88,872
<ALLOWANCES>                      (25,432)            (10,480)
<INVENTORY>                        39,516              61,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  157,093             242,233
<PP&E>                             12,187              38,474
<DEPRECIATION>                     (5,638)            (24,597)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    174,907             327,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              72,273              55,852
<BONDS>                            96,691             116,306
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0                   0
<COMMON>                              577                 553
<OTHER-SE>                          5,366             154,955
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      174,907             327,666
<SALES>                           142,151             225,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  142,151             225,206
<CGS>                              96,474              78,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      96,474              78,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   25,432              10,480
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  7,626               7,832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (144,683)             35,152
<INCOME-TAX>                        4,079               2,201
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (148,762)              4,000
<DISCONTINUED>                          0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    (7,974)                  0
<CHANGES>                               0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                     (140,788)              4,000
<EPS-BASIC>                         (5.48)               0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (5.48)               0.15

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.7


[E-Loan letterhead]







November 27, 2002South Park Corporate Center
   Attn: Mr. M. Craig Meek
   3563 Philips Highway - Bldg. G
   Jacksonville, FL 32207

Dear Craig:

RE:	That certain Lease dated February 4, 2002 between SOUTHPARK
CORPORATE CENTER, llc, a Delaware limited company ("Landlord") and
E-Loan, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant")

The purpose of this letter is to exercise our rights under paragraph 2.6
Tenant's Right to Cancel Lease,on page 4 of the above referenced
lease.  This notice to you shall serve to terminate our lease effective June 2,
2003.

We shall continue to perform our obligation of the lease through the
expiration/termination date of our lease, June 2, 2003, at which time all
applicable conditions of termination shall be met.
Thank you for your continued cooperation.

Sincerely,

/s/

Matthew Roberts
   						CFO - E-LOAN, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officer hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation for the quarter ended April 1, 2007 as to which this Certification is an exhibit
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of COMFORCE Corporation.

Signed May 7, 2007.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Harry V. Maccarrone                             
|Harry V. Maccarrone                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



25
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 2, 2015

s0630 

# Order

Clerk July 2, 2015

151741

SC: 151741

In re VANGORDER, Minors. COA: 324716

Ingham CC Family Division:

14

- 001220

- NA; 14

- 001221

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.2



Rule 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATION



I, Harry V. Maccarrone, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of COMFORCE Corporation, hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2004                               
|/s/ Harry V. Maccarrone                             
|Harry V. Maccarrone                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-53507,  333-95577 and 333-90606) and on Form S-8
(No. 333-90035 333-36359 and 333-109932) of Silverstar  Holdings,  Ltd (formerly
Leisureplanet  Holdings,  Ltd) of our report dated August 18, 2004,  relating to
the  consolidated  financial  statements for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003
and 2002, which appear in this Form 10-K.

                                          /s/ Rachlin Cohen & Holtz LLP
                                          RACHLIN COHEN & HOLTZ LLP


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
September 28, 2004
69–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 106–41

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 707, THE

DISASTER MITIGATION AND COST REDUCTION ACT OF 1999

MARCH 3, 1999.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 91]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 91, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 707, ‘‘The

Disaster Mitigation and Cost Reduction Act of 1999,’’ under an

open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided

equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

The rule waives clause 4(a) of Rule XIII (requiring a three-day

layover of the committee report) against consideration of the bill.

The waiver is necessary because the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee was not able to file its report until Wednesday,

March 3, and the bill may be considered in the House on Thursday,

March 4. The rule makes in order the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure amendment in the nature of a substitute

as an original bill for the purpose of amendment, which shall be

read by title.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record

prior to their consideration will be given priority in recognition to

offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with House rules.

The rule allows for the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

to postpone votes during the consideration of the bill, and to reduce

voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion

to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30485

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FELIX AJEGBO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CR-240“R”

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1996

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Felix Ajegbo, federal prisoner #87435-012, appeals from the

district court order transferring the case to the District of

Nevada under 28 U.S.C. § 3202(d). Federal appellate courts have

jurisdiction over appeals only from (1) final orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291; (2) orders that are deemed final due to jurisprudential

exception or that have been properly certified as final pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); and (3) interlocutory orders that fall
No. 96-30485

- 2 -

into specific classes, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a), or that have been

properly certified for appeal by the district court, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292(b). An order transferring a civil action is interlocutory

in nature and is not appealable prior to the entry of a final

judgment. Stelly v. Employers Nat'l Ins. Co., 431 F.2d 1251,

1253 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 908 (1971). We can

discern no basis upon which any of the district court's orders

can be reviewed prior to the entry of a final judgment. The

appeal is DISMISSED. All outstanding motions are DENIED.

We previously warned Ajegbo that further prosecution of

frivolous appeals could result in sanctions against him. See In

re Ajegbo, No. 96-00041 (5th Cir. May 1, 1996). Accordingly,

Ajegbo is BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil

appeal in this court without the prior written approval of a

judge of this court in active service. Further, he is BARRED

from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial civil pleading

in any court which is subject to this court’s jurisdiction,

without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum

court. The clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal

district courts subject to the jurisdiction of this court are

directed to return to Ajegbo, unfiled, any attempted submission

inconsistent with this bar. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
#### § 109-38.5100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures concerning the utilization of motor equipment.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Income tax treatment ofcooperatives [electronic resource] /**
 
SuDoc Number:A 109.10/2:44/

Item Number:0065-B-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000879359
 
Parts: 0102030405| Citations Table
 
April 27, 2020
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Mountain Province
Diamonds Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jan W. Vandersande, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.     The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2.     The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 27, 2005

| | /s/ Jan W.
      VandersandeName:
      Jan W. VandersandeTitle: Chief Executive
Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 10-11175.

#### Altidor *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.