alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Document 112-136]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

112th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 112-136

 
     CONTINUATION OF EMERGENCY REGARDING EXPORT CONTROL REGULATIONS

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   A CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY REGARDING EXPORT CONTROL 
               REGULATIONS, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d)

 September 10, 2012.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
                         ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                       Washington, August 15, 2012.
Hon. John Boehner,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Section 202(d) of the National 
Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic 
termination of a national emergency unless, within the 90-day 
period prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the 
President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to 
the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue 
in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance with this 
provision, I have sent to the Federal Register for publication 
the enclosed notice, stating that the emergency caused by the 
lapse of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, is 
to continue in effect for 1 year beyond August 17, 2012.
            Sincerely,
                                                      Barack Obama.
                                 Notice

                              ----------                              

 Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Export Control 
                              Regulations

    On August 17, 2001, consistent with the authority provided 
to the President under the International Emergency Economic 
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the President issued 
Executive Order 13222. In that order, he declared a national 
emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat 
to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the 
United States in light of the expiration of the Export 
Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2401 et 
seq.). Because the Export Administration Act has not been 
renewed by the Congress, the national emergency declared on 
August 17, 2001, must continue in effect beyond August 17, 
2012. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 
National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 
13222.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and 
transmitted to the Congress.

                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, August 15, 2012.

                                  

```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             464
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        758
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,768
<PP&E>                                          59,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                (47,499)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,198
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           279
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,476)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,170
<SALES>                                          1,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,334
<CGS>                                            1,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    94
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  88
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (595)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (595)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (595)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39619-39620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16161]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 11, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. Thomas Family; Candice Elaine Maddox, Pickerington, Ohio; Alan 
Paul Thomas, Bruceton Mills, West Virginia; Brandon Lowell Thomas, 
Bruceton Mills, West Virginia; Brian Fike Thomas, Morgantown, West 
Virginia; Chase Fike Thomas, Morgantown, West Virginia; Corissa Blair 
Thomas, Morgantown, West Virginia; David Martin Thomas, Morgantown, 
West Virginia; Gregory Clark Thomas, Bruceton Mills, West Virginia; 
Jeffrey Ward Thomas, Bruceton Mills, West Virginia; Laura Kay Thomas, 
Morgantown, West Virginia; Mary Feather Thomas, Bruceton Mills, West

[[Page 39620]]

Virginia; Melinda Jean Thomas, Bruceton Mills, West Virginia; Phyllis 
Jean Thomas, Bruceton Mills, West Virginia; Ward Fike Thomas, Bruceton 
Mills, West Virginia; to retain voting shares of State Bancorp, Inc., 
Bruceton Mills, West Virginia, and thereby indirectly retain voting 
shares of Bruceton Bank, Bruceton Mills, West Virginia, and Terra Alta 
Bank, Terra Alta, West Virginia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. David R. and Norvelle Dickey, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; to 
acquire voting shares of First Thomas Ban Corp, Thomas, Oklahoma, and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First National Bank of 
Thomas, Thomas, Oklahoma.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 21, 2000.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-16161 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4293

To require the transfer of the control of the Lorton Correctional Complex

to the Bureau of Prisons.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1994

Mr. MORAN introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on the Judiciary and the District of Columbia

A BILL

To require the transfer of the control of the Lorton

Correctional Complex to the Bureau of Prisons.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF CONTROL.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General of the Unit5 ed States, acting through the Director of the Bureau of

6 Prisons, and the District of Columbia shall enter into an

7 agreement under which the Director shall assume control

8 over and management of the Lorton Correctional Complex

9 not later than two years after date of enactment.
2

HR 4293 IH

1 (b) PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT.—The agreement

2 entered into pursuant to subsection (a) shall include provi3 sions to ensure that, within two years after date of enact4 ment—

5 (1) any authority possessed by the Department

6 of Corrections of the District of Columbia on Janu7 ary 1, 1994, to control or manage the Lorton Cor8 rectional Complex is transferred to the Director;

9 (2) the Director has complete control, including

10 the authority to make repairs, alterations, or re11 placements, of all buildings, facilities, and other

12 physical property on the site of the Lorton Correc13 tional Complex;

14 (3) all employees at the Lorton Correctional

15 Complex meet the standards that the Bureau of

16 Prisons requires of employees at similar correctional

17 facilities; and

18 (4) the regulations and policies of the Bureau

19 of Prisons—

20 (A) apply fully to the Lorton Correctional

21 Complex;

22 (B) guide the determination of which pris23 oners serve their sentences at the Lorton Cor24 rectional Complex; and
3

HR 4293 IH

1 (C) govern the transfer of prisoners be2 tween the Lorton Correctional Complex and

3 other institutions.

4 (c) SCHEDULE FOR AGREEMENT.—The agreement

5 required by subsection (a) shall be entered into not later

6 than one hundred and eighty days after the date of the

7 enactment of this Act.

8 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

9 For purposes of this Act:

10 (1) The term ‘‘Director’’ means the Director of

11 the Bureau of Prisons.

12 (2) The term ‘‘Lorton Correctional Complex’’

13 includes any correctional, reformatory, or related fa14 cility in Lorton, Virginia that on March 8, 1994, is

15 under the authority, control, supervision, or manage16 ment of the Department of Corrections, the mayor,

17 or any other agency or official, of the District of

18 Columbia.

19 (3) The Bureau of Prisons shall be reimbursed

20 by the District of Columbia for the cost of housing

21 prisoners from the District of Columbia at an

22 amount not less than $100,000,000 per fiscal year.

Æ
No. 11-9322.

#### Wynn *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 0.261 Authority delegated. ( a ) Subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, the Chief, Space Bureau, is hereby delegated the authority to perform the functions and activities described in § 0.51, including without limitation the following: ( 1 ) To recommend rulemakings, studies, and analyses (legal, engineering, social, and economic) of various petitions for policy or rule changes submitted by industry or the public, and to assist the Commission in conducting the same.
( 2 ) To act upon applications for satellite systems and earth stations pursuant to part 25 of this chapter.
( 3 ) In conjunction with the Office of International Affairs, to notify the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) of the United States' terrestrial and satellite assignments for inclusion in the Master International Frequency Register.
( 4 ) To interpret and enforce rules and regulations pertaining to matters under its jurisdiction and not within the jurisdiction of the Enforcement Bureau.
( b ) Notwithstanding the authority delegated in paragraph (a) of this section, the Chief, Space Bureau, shall not have authority: ( 1 ) To act on any application, petition, pleading, complaint, enforcement matter, or other request that: ( i ) Presents new or novel arguments not previously considered by the Commission;
( ii ) Presents facts or arguments which appear to justify a change in Commission policy; or
( iii ) Cannot be resolved under outstanding precedents and guidelines after consultation with appropriate Bureaus or Offices.
( 2 ) To issue notices of proposed rulemaking, notices of inquiry, or reports or orders arising from rulemaking or inquiry proceedings;
( 3 ) To act upon any application for review of actions taken by the Chief, Space Bureau, pursuant to delegated authority, except that the Chief of the Space Bureau may dismiss any such application that does not contain any statement required under § 1.115(a) or (b) of this chapter, or does not comply with the filing requirements of § 1.115(d) or (f) of this chapter;
( 4 ) To act upon any formal or informal radio application which is in hearing status;
( 5 ) To designate for hearing any applications except: ( i ) Mutually exclusive applications for radio facilities filed pursuant to part 25, of this chapter; and
( ii ) Applications for facilities where the issues presented relate solely to whether the applicant has complied with outstanding precedents and guidelines; or
( 6 ) To impose, reduce, or cancel forfeitures pursuant to section 203 or section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, in amounts of more than $80,000 for common carrier providers and $20,000 for non-common carrier providers.
[88 FR 21430, Apr. 10, 2023]
392P15

#### State v. Joshua Donyell Walker

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-340)

Denied
Motion Granted; Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 21 , 2013
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00526

- CR

LEONARDO MARTINEZ LO ZANO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Tex as Trial Court Cause No. 1277258



### M E M OR A N DU M OP I N I ON Appella nt entered a plea of guilty , without an agreed recommendation on punishment, to aggravated robbery with the use or exhibit ion of a deadly weapon

. O n April 23 , 2012, the trial court found appellant guilty and sentence d him to confinement for five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas D epartment of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.2

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which s he concludes the appeal is wh oll y frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Hi gh v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). A copy of counsel’s bri ef was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Appellant has filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record , counsel’s brief , and appellant’s pro se brief. We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, the judgment of the tria l court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Boyce and Donovan. Do Not Publish

— T ex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DELORIS WILLIAMS
, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES,

DIVISION OF RETIREMENT
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2108

[ May 6, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Department of Management Services, Division of

Retirement ; L.T. Case No s

. 19

- 5499 and DMS

- 20

- 0046

.

Deloris Williams, Riviera Beach, pro se.

William Chorba, General Counsel, Rebekah A. Davis, Deputy General Counsel, and Ladasiah Jackson Ford, Assistant G eneral Counsel, Department of Management Services , Tallahassee, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS
, G ERBER and K LINGENSMITH
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,889
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,010
<INVENTORY>                                     38,993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,247
<PP&E>                                          79,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,217
<BONDS>                                         36,162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     26,156
<COMMON>                                         5,212
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,070
<SALES>                                         55,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,013
<CGS>                                           38,527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,350
<INCOME-TAX>                                       791
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,559
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
Blueprint





 






 Exhibit 10.20



AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO



6% CONVERTIBLE NOTE


THIS
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 6% CONVERTIBLE NOTE, dated as of March 21, 2016
(this “Amendment”), between Adgero Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Adam K. Stern (the
“Investor”).



W I T N E S S E T H


WHEREAS, the
Company previously issued to Investor its 6% Convertible Note in
the principal amount of $250,000, dated December 23, 2015 (the
“Note”); and


WHEREAS, the
Company and Investor wish to amend the Note to extend the Maturity
Date of the Note.


NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual
promises herein contained and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, hereby agree to amend the Note as
follows:


1
1. Definitions;
References; Continuation of Agreement. Unless otherwise
specified herein, each term used herein that is defined in the Note
shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Note. Each
reference to “hereof,” “hereto,”
“hereunder,” “herein” and
“hereby” and each other similar reference, and each
reference to “this Note” and each other similar
reference, contained in the Note shall from and after the date
hereof refer to the Note as amended hereby. Except as amended
hereby, all terms and provisions of the Note shall continue
unmodified and remain in full force and effect.


2
2. Extension of
Maturity Date. The second sentence of Section 1 of the Note
is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows:


“Maturity Date”
shall mean June 9, 2016.


 


3
3. Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which when
taken together shall be considered one and the same agreement and
shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each
party and delivered to the other party, it being understood that
both parties need not sign the same counterpart. In the event that
any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e-mail
delivery of a “.pdf” format data file, such signature
shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing
(or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force
and effect as if such facsimile or “.pdf” signature
page were an original thereof.


4
4. Governing
Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.



[Signature page to follow]



 

1







 






 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to
be duly executed on the date first above written.


ADGERO
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


 


 


By:
/s/ Frank Pilkiewicz
                 
       



Name:
Frank Pilkiewicz


Title:
Chief Executive Officer


 


 


 


INVESTOR


 


 


/s/ Adam K.
Stern                                     




Adam K.
Stern




 


 






2
§ 302-8.103 Where may my HHG be stored? Your HHG may be stored either in: ( a ) Available Government-owned storage space; or
( b ) Suitable commercial storage space obtained by the Government if: ( 1 ) Government-owned space is not available, or
( 2 ) Commercial storage space is more economical or suitable because of location, transportation costs, or for other reasons.