alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Moscow CableCom Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Mikhail A. Smirnov, Chief Executive Officer, and Tate Fite, Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Moscow CableCom Corp.



|June 5, 2007 | /s/ Mikhail A. Smirnov 
|------------ | -----------------------
|             | Mikhail A. Smirnov     
|             | Chief Executive Officer
|             |                        
|June 5, 2007 | /s/ Tate Fite          
|             | Tate Fite              
|             | Chief Financial Officer





This certification shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Analogic Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John J. Millerick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 10, 2007



/s/ John J. MillerickJohn J. MillerickChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 24

- 12813

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus THE CITY OF WARNER ROBINS, SERGEANT TIMOTHY T. PIPPIO,

Defendants

- Appellees.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 5:23

- cv

- 00184

- MTT

____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-12813 Document: 5-1 Date Filed: 10/04/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 24

- 12813

Before R OSENBAUM , L UCK , and B RASHER , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction. Benjamin Franklin appeals from the district court’s order that entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants as to his federal law claims and dismissed without prejudice his state law claims.We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because Franklin’s notice of appeal is untimely. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin.
, 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010)

. The deadline for filing a notice of appeal was August 9, 2024, and Franklin did not file his notice of appeal until August 30, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) . Franklin is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6) because he did not file a motion to extend or assert that he did not receive timely notic e of the final order or judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(c); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) (A), 4(a)(6) ; Sanders v. United States , 113 F.3d 184, 187 (11th Cir. 1997). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 24-12813 Document: 5-1 Date Filed: 10/04/2024 Page: 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2322

JIMMIE ECHOLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (2:14-cv-00040-FL)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmie Echols, Appellant Pro Se. David Gerald Cahill, Caroline P. 

Mackie, POYNER SPRUILL LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kristen Price 

Miller, POYNER SPRUILL LLP, Rocky Mount, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmie Echols appeals the district court’s order accepting 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil 

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Echols v. Branch Banking & Trust, No. 2:14-cv-00040-

FL (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 30, 2015, entered Oct. 1, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4239 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4239

  To provide for the establishment of a foreign assistance program to 
  support efforts by other countries to protect intellectual property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 1994

Mr. Gejdenson (for himself and Mr. Roth) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the establishment of a foreign assistance program to 
  support efforts by other countries to protect intellectual property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--In carrying out part I of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and other relevant foreign assistance 
laws, the President, acting through the Administrator of the United 
States Agency for International Development, shall establish a program 
of training and other technical assistance to assist foreign countries 
in--
            (1) developing and strengthening laws and regulations to 
        protect intellectual property; and
            (2) developing the infrastructure necessary to implement 
        and enforce such laws and regulations.
    (b) Participation of Other Agencies.--The Administrator of the 
United States Agency for International Development--
            (1) shall utilize the expertise of the Patent and Trademark 
        Office and other agencies of the United States Government in 
        designing and implementing the program of assistance provided 
        for in this section;
            (2) shall coordinate assistance under this section with 
        efforts of other agencies of the United States Government to 
        increase international protection of intellectual property, 
        including implementation of international agreements containing 
        high levels of protection of intellectual property; and
            (3) shall consult with the heads of such other agencies in 
        determining which foreign countries will receive assistance 
        under this section.

                                 <all>
```
The Keetac file The Keetac file

( 251 KB ) was not the latest version was not the latest version was not the latest version ; the latest version is of the latest version is of the latest version is of 181 KB in size KB in size Jiang, Hongming Hongming Hongming

( MPCA ) to: Kathleen Dagostino 11/14/2012 03:38 PM Cc: "Neuschler, Catherine (MPCA)"
History: This message has been replied to and forwarded .

2 attachments

BARTNOx62B.xlsx BARTNOx62B.xlsx Keetac BART Supporting Data.xlsx Keetac BART Supporting Data.xlsx

Kathleen:

Catherine cleaned up the spreadsheets I started, resulting in the attached version of 181 KB in size. When I replied to your e-mail today, I attached a wrong file to add Minitab 16 stuff, making it to 251 KB. I should have pasted the stuff to the 181 KB file. Sorry for the error!

I’d need to sort out something else with Minntac’s SO2 data and will e-mail you tomorrow.

- Hongming

From: Jiang, Hongming (MPCA) Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:42 PM
To : 'Dagostino.Kathleen@epamail.epa.gov' Cc: Neuschler, Catherine (MPCA) Subject: RE: Keetac SO2 limit

Kathleen:

Attached is the spreadsheet file, the filename of which is a misnormer (as the file holds not only CEMS data for NOx but also CEMS data for SO2). See the 2nd tab, cell AF3. You can see how the value was calculated and verified. If you received this file previously, please save the file attached to this e-mail using a slightly different filename – I have added a bit of Minitab graphs and a table of data to show how the statistical analysis was done. Let me know if you have questions.
Thanks!

- Hongming

From: Dagostino.Kathleen@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Dagostino.Kathleen@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:01 AM
To : Jiang, Hongming (MPCA) Subject: Keetac SO2 limitDo you have a spreadsheet with your calculations for the SO2

limit for Keetac? The file you sent us has Keetac on the summary page but doesn't have a tab with calculations for the facility. Thanks.

______________________ Kathleen D'Agostino Environmental Engineer U.S. EPA - Region 5 Phone: (312) 886-1767 email: dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donald Miller-Jones, the Chief Financial Officer of Moscow CableCom Corp. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

·

Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/            Donald Miller-JonesName:     Donald Miller-Jones
Title:       Chief Financial Officer
Date:       May 16, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Microelectronics and Computer Technology 
Corporation (``MCC'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 13, 2000, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Microelectronics and Computer 
Technology Corporation (``MCC'') has filed written notification 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership status and planned 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Nokia 
Research Center, Helsinki, FINLAND; Schlumberger, San Jose, CA; 
Southwestern Bell, St. Louis, MO; and Telefonica, Madrid, SPAIN have 
been dropped as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Microelectronics and Computer 
Technology Corporation (``MCC'') intends to file additional written 
notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On December 21, 1984, Microelectronics and Computer Technology 
Corporation (``MCC'') filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 
17, 1985 (50 FR 2633).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 16, 
1999. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 2, 1999 (64 FR 67590).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-16474 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4401-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16548]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Draft Public Health Action Plan To Combat Antimicrobial 
Resistance; Correction

    In the notice document appearing on page 38832 in the Federal 
Register issue of Thursday, June 22, 2000, make the following 
corrections:
    On page 38833 under both headings FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
and ADDRESSES the fax number should read: 404/371-5489; the URL is: 
http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/actionplan/.

    Dated: June 26, 2000.
Thena M. Durham,
Director, Executive Secretariat, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 00-16548 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# Comments on: 18-2221: BEBLEY v. AIR FORCE [OPINION], Nonprecedential
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: **Nancy L Paddock <nancy.paddock@veoliaes.com>**

Sent: **Tuesday, December 10, 2013 8:29 AM**

To: **Ogulei, David**

Cc: **Dennis J Warchol** Subject: **Title V Revisions**

Attachments: **Emissions Calcs from Application from Veolia 12-9-1 3.xlsx; A4 Form PTE Summary(1 of 2)**  **rev5clean.doc; A5 Form PTE Summary(2 of 2)rev5clean .doc; cUnit 3 (1 of 2)rev5.doc; aUnit 2**  **(1 of 2)rev5.doc; lDrum Crusherrev5.doc; eUnit 4 (1 of 2)rev5.doc; Veolia Page 18rev5**  **clean.pdf**



### David,

**We've corrected errors/typos and hopefully all the numbers add up now. We've also addressed**  **organic compounds as HAPs. Your spreadsheet has be en modified as well, hopefully you'll find this**  **helpful. Attached you will find the following; let 's see if these items will get the job done for us!** 

**1. Your spreadsheet with our updates in RED.** 

**2. Revised FORM PTE’s** 

**3. Revised FORM EMISS’s for Unit2, Unit3, Unit4 and Dr**  **um Crusher**

**4. Revised Page 18 from the Narrative.** 

**Let me know if you need anything else.**

Nancy Paddock Environmental Engineering Specialist Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C.

7 Mobile Avenue Sauget, IL 62201 618.271.2804 (x-115) 618.271.2128 (fax)

Nancy.Paddock@VeoliaES.com

www.VeoliaES.com

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Soluti ons, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended rec ipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. A ny unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribu tion is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communic ate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and delete it from all computers.
# Comments on: 2018-1236: InVue Security Products Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4231 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4231

    To prohibit regulations that classify, enhance, or diminish the 
    privileges and immunities of an Indian tribe relative to other 
      federally recognized Indian tribes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 1994

 Mr. Richardson (for himself and Mr. Thomas of Wyoming) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit regulations that classify, enhance, or diminish the 
    privileges and immunities of an Indian tribe relative to other 
      federally recognized Indian tribes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 16 of the 
Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 476), is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsections:
    ``(f) Privileges and Immunities of Indian Tribes; Prohibition on 
New Regulations.--The head of a department or agency of the United 
States may not promulgate any regulation or make any decision or 
determination pursuant to this Act or any other Act of Congress, with 
respect to a federally recognized Indian tribe that classifies, 
enhances, or diminishes the privileges and immunities available to the 
Indian tribe relative to other federally recognized tribes by virtue of 
their status as Indian tribes.
    ``(g) Privileges and Immunities of Indian Tribes; Existing 
Regulations.--Any regulation or administrative decision or 
determination of a department or agency of the United States in 
existence or effect on the date of enactment of this subsection that 
classifies, enhances, or diminishes the privileges and immunities 
available to a federally recognized Indian tribe relative to the 
privileges and immunities available to other federally recognized 
tribes by virtue of their status as Indian tribes shall have no force 
or effect.''.

                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 22, 2014

t1015 

# Order

Clerk October 22, 2014

Rehearing No. 602

147428

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147428

COA: 302353

Berrien CC: 2010

- 015309

- FC

DAKOTAH WOLFGANG ELIASON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rehearing and/or clarification is considered.

On November 6, 2013, t his Court granted the defendant’s application for leave to appeal

limited to “(1) whether the Court of Appeals correctly applied Miller v Alabama , 567 US

___ (2012), to Michigan’s sentencing scheme for first

- degree murder; (2) whether that

sentencing schem e amounts to cruel or unusual punishment under Const 1963, art 1, § 16

as applied to defendants under the age of 18; and (3) what remedy is required for

defendants whose sentences have been found invalid under Miller or Const 1963, art 1,

§ 16.” People v Eliason , 495 Mich 891 (2013). With regard to the other issues that were

raised in the defendant’s application for leave to appeal but not addressed in this Court’s

prior opinion, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

questions p re sented should be reviewed by this Court. In all other respects, the motion

for rehearing and/or clarification is DENIED.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SPITZ TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NOBEL BIOCARE USA, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2018-1790

______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in No. 8:17-cv-00660-JVSJCG, Judge James V. Selna.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & 

Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by SANFORD IAN WEISBURST; FELIPE 

CORREDOR, San Francisco, CA. 

 SHEILA N. SWAROOP, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, 

LLP, Irvine, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN B. SGANGA, JR., BARAA KAHF. 

______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LINN and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 July 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
016P16

#### Maurice Antonio Burris v. Kelly J. Thomas, Commissioner of the North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles

1. Pit’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-312)

1. Allowed 01/20/2016

2. Pit’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2.

3. Pit’s PDR

3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

This notice announces the cancellation of previously announced meeting. 

## Federal Notice Citation of Previous Announcement

**Federal Register:**                     June 13, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 114) [Notices]—[Page 37153-37154].                 

*Change in the Meeting:*                     This meeting has been cancelled.                 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Michael J. Sage, Executive Secretary, ACERER, and Acting Deputy Director, NCEH, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, (F-28), Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 770/488-7002, fax 770/488-7015. 

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: June 22, 2000.

Carolyn J. Russell, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 00-16275 Filed 6-23-00; 10:29 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P