alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10717 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SANTIAGO COVARRUBIAS-COVARRUBIAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CR-72-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Santiago Covarrubias-Covarrubias raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 4558

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. STEPHONI VERNARD SUMTER, a/k/a Steezy, a/k/a Step , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Terry L. Wooten , Senior District Judge. ( 3:14

- cr - 00736

- TLW

- 4 )

Submitted : August 19, 2021 Decided: August 23, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD , and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ian T. Duggan, CALLISON TIGHE & ROBINSON, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STAT ES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Stephoni Vernard Sumter seeks to appeal the district court’s criminal judgment, as amended in response to a motion in his c riminal case. Sumter’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious issues for appeal but questioning whether the district court relied on impermissible factors in resolving the m otion and whether the court’s ruling was
reasonable

. Sumter was informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. The Government has declined to file a response brief. Our review of the district court’s order is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). While
that statute provides us with “jurisdiction to hear challenges to the lawfulness of the method used by the district court ” in issuing its ruling, we lack “jurisdiction to review any part of” the court’s discretionary decision. United States v. Davis , 679 F.3d 190, 19 4 (4th Cir. 2012).
Our review of the record reveals that the district court’s method in issuing its ruling
was lawful . Because Sumter identifies no ground upon which this court may review the district court’s substantive ruling, and our independent review of the record pursuant to
Anders has revealed no such ground, we lack the authority to review the district court’s amended judgment. Accordingl y, we dismiss the appeal. This court requires that counsel inform Sumter , in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Sumter requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petit ion would be frivolous, then counsel may3 move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Sumter

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
382P93-2

#### State v. Truman Calvin Boone

1. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court of Guilford

1. Dismissed

2. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

3. Dismissed as moot
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-1807: TQ DELTA, LLC v. ARRIS GROUP, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZQw3giI8pI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-25-2022-21-1807-tq-delta-llc-v-arris-group-inc-rule-36-judgment-21-1807-rule_36_judgment-1-25-2022_1897776\/\">21-1807: TQ DELTA, LLC v. ARRIS GROUP, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-25-2022-21-1807-tq-delta-llc-v-arris-group-inc-rule-36-judgment-21-1807-rule_36_judgment-1-25-2022_1897776\/embed\/#?secret=ZQw3giI8pI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-1807: TQ DELTA, LLC v. ARRIS GROUP, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"ZQw3giI8pI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"RULE 36 JUDGMENT Posted: TQ DELTA, LLC v. ARRIS GROUP, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-1807 Origin: PTO Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosures of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 21, 2000.
    Time: 2 pm. to 3:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: 6100 Executive Blvd. 5th Floor, Rockville, MD 20852 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Hameed Khan, PHD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 
6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 23, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-16613 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 432 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 432

To prohibit exports of unprocessed timber and wood chips to any country 
  that does not provide reciprocal access to its markets for finished 
         wood products and paper produced in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Wilson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit exports of unprocessed timber and wood chips to any country 
  that does not provide reciprocal access to its markets for finished 
         wood products and paper produced in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EXPORTS OF UNPROCESSED TIMBER AND WOOD CHIPS 
              TO CERTAIN COUNTRIES.

    No unprocessed timber or wood chips may be exported from the United 
States to any country that does not provide reciprocal access to its 
markets for finished wood products and paper produced in the United 
States.

SEC. 2. EXERCISE OF AUTHORITIES.

    The President shall exercise the authorities of the Export 
Administration Act of 1979 to carry out section 1.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this Act--
            (1) the term ``unprocessed timber'' has the meaning given 
        that term in section 493(7) of the Forest Resources 
        Conservation and Shortage Relief Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 
        620e(7));
            (2) the term ``finished wood products'' means wood products 
        other than unprocessed timber; and
            (3) the term ``United States'' includes any commonwealth, 
        territory, or possession of the United States.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32(a)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael G.
Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Michael G.
Morris


Michael
G. Morris


Chief
Executive Officer








October
30, 2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Skip NavigationEn Español

You are here:                Home » Disorders A - Z » Trigeminal Neuralgia »             

Skip secondary menu

Home

Disorders A - Z

Information Page

Publications

Organizations

News

Research literature

Other related groupsOrganizationsProfessional SocietiesGovernment Resources

NINDS Clinical Trials

En EspañolOrder Brochures

News From NINDS

Recovery Act

Funding Information

Training & Career Awards

Diversity Programs

Research Programs

Find People

About NINDS

 

Email this pagePrint-friendly versionContact NINDS

----

Adobe ReaderMicrosoft Word Viewer

# Trigeminal Neuralgia Fact Sheet

See a list of all NINDS Disorders

Get Web page suited for printing                              			Email this to a friend or colleague                              			Neuralgia del trigémino

## Table of Contents (click to jump to sections)
§ 302-11.407 What documentation must we require the employee to submit before paying residence transaction expenses? Before paying residence transaction expenses, you must require the employee to submit: ( a ) A copy of the employee's financial documents which prove that only the employee and or a member(s) of the immediate family made payments on the property;
( b ) A copy of the employee's financial documents which prove that the employee and/or a member(s) of the immediate family received all proceeds from the sale of the property;
( c ) Documentation that is acceptable by you in verifying any interest that the employee has in the property; and
( d ) Any additional documents that you need to verify payments.
[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12256, Feb. 16, 2024]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10061

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RICHARD DEON MURRELL,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-471-5

Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and HO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Richard Deon Murrell has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Murrell has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 9, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-10061 Document: 00514546622 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2018
No. 17-10061

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-10061 Document: 00514546622 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2018
Tuesday 14th September, 2004.

In Re: Wendell Wilson, Petitioner.

Record No. 1739-04-2

Upon a Petition for a Writ of Actual Innocence Before Chief Judge Fitzpatric k, Judges Elder and Humphreys

Wendell Wilson petitions this Court for a Writ of Actual Innocence pursu ant to Chapter 19.3 of Title 19.2 of the Code of Virginia. He contends he is innocent of two crimes for which he was convicted

in the Circuit Court of the C ity of Colonial Heights in 1997, to-wit, CR96-112-01 and CR96-112-02. We do not have the authority to issue a writ in this matter. The documentation accompanying Wilson’s petition reveals that he pled guilty to th e charges pursuant to a plea agreement. Code § 19.2-327.10 reads in pertinent part: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law or rule of court, upon a petition of a person who was convicted of a felony upon a plea of not guilty , the Court of Appeals shall have the authority to issue writs of act ual innocence under this chapter.” (Emphasis added.) Accordingly, we su mmarily dismiss the petition.

Because the issue addressed herein is one of fi rst impression and potential litigants and members of the bar may benefit from the directives herein , we direct the Clerk to publish this order.

A Copy,

Teste:

Clerk
No. 11-13.

#### Kartman et al. *v.*State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: 2021-1495: Tris Pharma, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc.
EXHIBIT 10.1

 

AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE POLICY FOR KEY EXECUTIVES

 

SCHEDULE A

 

(Updated as of November 15, 2016)

 

	
Key Executive
    	
 
    	
Severance Payment Multiple
    
	
Michael S. Burke
    	
 
    	
2 Times
    
	
Stephen M. Kadenacy
    	
 
    	
1.5 Times
    
	
Daniel P. McQuade
    	
 
    	
1.5 Times
    
	
Frederick W. Werner
    	
 
    	
1.5 Times
    
	
Randall A. Wotring
    	
 
    	
1.5 Times
    
	
Carla J. Christofferson
    	
 
    	
1.5 Times
    
	
Mary E. Finch
    	
 
    	
1.5 Times
    
	
William T. Rudd
    	
 
    	
1.5 Times
§ 302-3.427 What relocation allowances may my agency pay when I am permanently assigned to my temporary official station? When you are permanently assigned to your temporary official station, your agency may pay: ( a ) Travel, including per diem, in accordance with part 302-4 of this chapter, for one round trip between your temporary official station and your previous official station, for you and members of your immediate family who relocated to the temporary official station with you. Your agency may also pay the same expenses for a one-way trip from the previous official station to the new permanent official station for any immediate family members who did not accompany you to the temporary official station;
( b ) Residence transaction expenses under part 302-11 of this chapter;
( c ) Property management expenses under part 302-15 of this chapter;
( d ) Relocation services under part 302-12 of this chapter;
( e ) Temporary quarters subsistence expenses in accordance with part 302-6 of this chapter;
( f ) Transportation of household goods not previously transported to the temporary official station under part 302-7 of this chapter;
( g ) Transportation of a privately owned vehicle(s) not previously transported to the temporary official station under § 302-9.7 of this chapter; and
( h ) Relocation income tax allowance (RITA) under part 302-17 of this chapter.
[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-06, 76 FR 71889, Nov. 21, 2011; 86 FR 73684, Dec. 28, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4352 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4352

 To require each Federal agency to use stationary on which is printed 
                  the telephone number of the agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 1994

  Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Government Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require each Federal agency to use stationary on which is printed 
                  the telephone number of the agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Agency Access Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL AGENCIES REQUIRED TO USE STATIONARY WITH TELEPHONE 
              NUMBER.

    The head of each Federal agency shall require, in the most cost 
effective manner practicable for the agency, that all written 
correspondence of the agency appear on stationary on which is printed 
the telephone number of the agency.

SEC. 3. REPORT.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the head of each Federal agency shall report to the Congress a plan for 
complying with this Act.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period March 31,
2007 (the "Report"), David J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, and President of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      DATE: MAY 14, 2007


                                      /S/ DAVID J. JOHNSON
                                      --------------------
                                      DAVID J. JOHNSON
                                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.