alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 101.117 Antenna polarization.

Except as set forth herein, stations operating in the radio services included in this part are not limited as to the type of polarization of the radiated signal that may be employed. However, in the event interference in excess of permissible levels is caused to the operation of other stations as a result of employing other than linear polarization, the Commission may order a licensee to change its system polarization to mitigate the interference. No change in polarization may be made without prior authorization from the Commission. Unless otherwise allowed, only linear polarization (horizontal and vertical) shall be used. For LMDS systems, unless otherwise authorized, system operators are permitted to use any polarization within its service area, but only vertical and/or horizontal polarization for antennas located within 20 kilometers of the outermost edge of their service area.

[68 FR 4957, Jan. 31, 2003]
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of LipidViro Tech, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I
Kenneth P. Hamik, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: 11/11/2004                          /s/Kenneth P. Hamik
      -----------                          -------------------------------
                                           Kenneth P. Hamik
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Director
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                          MOSSIMO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                                                  <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding during the period..............................     14,710
 
Dilutive effect of stock options...................................................        143
 
Equivalent shares issuable for the outstanding S distribution note.................         24
                                                                                     ---------
 
                                                                                        14,877
                                                                                     ---------
                                                                                     ---------
 
Pro forma net income for primary income per share..................................  $  10,782
                                                                                     ---------
                                                                                     ---------
 
Pro forma net income per share.....................................................  $    0.72
                                                                                     ---------
                                                                                     ---------
</TABLE>
No. 11-90.

#### Winters *v.*Brown.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Capital Corp of the West (“the Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodending December 31, 2002 As filed with Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Thomas T. Hawker , ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Capital Corp ofthe West and will be retained by Capital Corp of the West and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| March 25, 2003 |                    |
|----------------|-------------------------|
|           |                    |
|           | /s/ Thomas T. Hawker    |
|           | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"23-127: In Re CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8QF2lUKelH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/05-16-2023-23-127-in-re-centripetal-networks-llc-order-23-127-order-5-16-2023_2127592\/\">23-127: In Re CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/05-16-2023-23-127-in-re-centripetal-networks-llc-order-23-127-order-5-16-2023_2127592\/embed\/#?secret=8QF2lUKelH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“23-127: In Re CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"8QF2lUKelH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: In Re CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 23-127 Origin: RIT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
PROMISSORY NOTE
$66,531.22     April 15, 1997
I, Mark V. Heitz, residing in Topeka, Kansas ("Maker"), hereby promise to pay
to AmVestors Financial Corporation ("AmVestors"), a Kansas corporation, the
principal sum of sixty six thousand five hundred thirty-one dollars and
twenty-two cents ($66,531.22), together with interest thereon at the Prime
Rate as reported in the Wall Street Journal on April 15, 1997. All outstanding
principal and interest shall be due and payable in full on or before December
31, 1997.
     Maker
     /s/ Mark V. Heitz
     Mark V. Heitz
/note
83
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>   0001004540
<NAME>  AIRPLANES U.S. TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (5)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    17
<PP&E>                                             386
<DEPRECIATION>                                     151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               11
<BONDS>                                            323
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (181)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       280
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    41
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     (19)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (3)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (2)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (43)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (26)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (18)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (18)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1810 Review of compliance. ( a ) The Commission shall, beginning in 2004 and at least every three years thereafter, review its current policies and practices in view of advances in relevant technology and achievability. Based on this review, the Commission shall modify its practices and procedures to ensure that the Commission's programs and activities are fully accessible.
( b ) The Commission shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including individuals with disabilities or organizations representing individuals with disabilities, to participate in the review process by submitting comments. Written comments shall be signed by the commenter or by someone authorized to do so on his or her behalf. The signature of the commenter, or signature of someone authorized by the commenter to do so on his or her behalf, shall be provided on print comments. Comments in audio, Braille, electronic, and/or video formats shall contain an affirmative identity statement of the individual, which for this purpose shall be considered to be functionally equivalent to a commenter's signature.
( c ) The Commission shall maintain on file and make available for public inspection for four years following completion of the compliance review— ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and problems identified;
( 2 ) All comments and complaints filed regarding the Commission's compliance; and
( 3 ) A description of any modifications made.
#### § 301-10.100 What types of common carrier transportation may I be authorized to use?

You may be authorized to use airline, train, ship, bus, or other transit system.

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15955, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2010-02, 75 FR 24435, May 5, 2010]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE : TERRI FINNEGAN, LEE

CHAGRA, JR., AND JOANNA

KRANCHER

, RELATOR S

. §

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 1 6 2

- C V

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator s

, Terri Finnegan, Lee Chagra, Jr., and Joanna Krancher, ha ve filed a petition for

writ of mandamus against the Honorable Eduardo Gamboa, Judge of the Probate Court No. 2 of

El Paso County, Texas, asking that we order him to vacate an order entered on April 16, 2014

denying their motion to compel discovery. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the

relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance

Company of America , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id . at 136. We conclude that Relators have failed to

establish they are entitled to mandamus relief.

August 7 , 2014

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Jus tice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
1.72265625 Dn Diameter of Nozzle ( Ft. )2

13.78125 8* (Dn)2

1.36118889 Dd2 Diameter of Sampling Duct (Ft)2

10.12442145

3.977 Roof vent velocity (ft/sec) from Anemometer Data

40.26482412 Desired Velocity in the Duct (ft/sec)

5-1-13 Line 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0001004605
<NAME>                                          Augment Systems, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         74,420
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               74,420
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 74,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,698,835
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      118,989
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,743,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   74,420
<SALES>                                        10,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,489
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 187,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            165,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               184,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               352,645
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  184,527
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .02



</TABLE>
#### § 301-71.302 For how long may we issue a travel advance?

You may issue a travel advance for a reasonable period not to exceed 45 days.

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15974, Apr. 1, 1998. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 108, 67 FR 57967, Sept. 13, 2002]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-419 

________________________________________________________________________ 

JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 

Signed at Washington April 19, 2012 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 

Judicial Assistance 

 Agreement signed at Washington April 19, 2012; 

 Entered into force April 19, 2012.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40588

Conference Calendar

 

KENNETH D. FORD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HARRY E. KINKER, II, Assistant 

Warden, Coffield Unit, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:96-CV-622

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenneth D. Ford, Texas state prisoner #588298, appeals from

the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint as

frivolous. His claim of purported violations of his

constitutional rights in connection with a prison disciplinary

proceeding is premature under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477,

486-87 (1994). See Edwards v. Balisok, 117 S. Ct. 1584, 1589
No. 97-40588

-2-

(1997). The district court therefore did not abuse its

discretion by dismissing the claim as frivolous. 

 Ford’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus

frivolous. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
(b) (6)(b) (6)
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5613

To require an extension of the comment periods relating to certain proposed

rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 1, 2000

Mr. KNOLLENBERG (for himself, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. BRADY of

Texas, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. MANZULLO, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. CHAMBLISS,

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. JENKINS, Mr.

FOSSELLA, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. TRAFICANT, and Mr. BARTON of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To require an extension of the comment periods relating

to certain proposed rules.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

4 The comment periods on the proposed rules related

5 to clothes washers published at 65 Federal Register

6 59549–59588 (October 5, 2000) and the proposed rules

7 related to residential central air conditioners and heat

8 pumps published at 65 Federal Register 59589–59632
2

•HR 5613 IH

1 (October 5, 2000) shall both be extended from December

2 4, 2000, for a period of not less than 120 additional cal3 endar days.

Æ
# Comments on: 19-2321: CASIANO v. US [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4219

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical revisions to maps

relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 14, 1994

Mrs. FOWLER (for herself, Mr. HUTTO, Mr. PETERSON of Florida, Mrs.

THURMAN, Mr. MICA, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mr. GOSS, Mr. BACCHUS

of Florida, Mr. LEWIS of Florida, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. STEARNS,

Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. CANADY, Mr. MILLER of Florida,

Mrs. MEEK, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. JOHNSTON of Florida, Mr.

DEUTSCH, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. SHAW, and Mr. HASTINGS) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical

revisions to maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL REVISIONS TO MAPS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior

5 shall, before the end of the 30-day period beginning on

6 the date of the enactment of this Act, make such technical

7 revisions to the maps described in subsection (b) as are
2

•HR 4219 IH

1 necessary to ensure that depictions of areas on those maps

2 are consistent with the depictions of areas appearing on

3 the maps entitled lllllll, dated

4 lllllll, and on file with the Secretary.

5 (b) MAPS DESCRIBED.—The maps described in this

6 subsection are maps that—

7 (1) are included in a set of maps entitled

8 ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’, dated October

9 24, 1990; and

10 (2) relate to the following units of the Coastal

11 Barrier Resources System: P04A, P05, P05A, P08,

12 P10, P11A, P17, P17A, P18, P18P, P19, P19P,

13 P24, P25, FL–05P, FL–15, FL–90, and FL–95P.

Æ
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jennifer Dawson, Chief Financial Officer of Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Jennifer DawsonName:
Jennifer DawsonTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
April 6, 2010








This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit A 

 

DE 82-12 

pp.14-16

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 86-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2023 Page 1 of 1