alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 128 (Monday, July 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 41062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16697]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RM98-10-000, RM98-12-000 and RP00-335-000]


Regulation of Short-Term Natural Gas Transportation Services; 
Regulation of Interstate Natural Gas Transportation Services; and Black 
Marlin Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 27, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 15, 2000, Black Marlin Pipeline Company 
tendered for filing its pro forma tariff sheets, in compliance with 
Order Nos. 637 and 637-A.
    On February 9 and May 19, 2000, the Commission issued Order Nos. 
637 and 637-A, respectively, which prescribed new regulations, 
implemented new policies and revised certain existing regulations 
respecting natural gas transportation in interstate commerce. The 
Commission directed pipelines to file pro forma tariff sheets to comply 
with the new regulatory requirements regarding scheduling procedures, 
capacity segmentation, imbalance management services and penalty 
credits, or in the alternative, to explain why no changes to existing 
tariff provisions are necessary.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before July 17, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http:www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm. (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16697 Filed 6-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
32(b)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly Keller
Koeppel, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Holly Keller
Koeppel________


Holly
Keller Koeppel


Chief
Financial Officer








October
31, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
§ 302-17.103 What are the advantages of choosing a 1-year or a 2-year RITA process? ( a ) The one-year process is simpler. It reimburses the employee more quickly, and it eases the administrative burden required to calculate the RITA. Most importantly, the one-year process eliminates the possibility of charging employees for excess payments to the IRS, the so-called “negative RITA.”
( b ) The two-year process provides a somewhat more accurate calculation of the additional taxes the employee incurs because it is based on the employee's actual Year One taxable income and filing status rather than the taxable income and filing status from the year before.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDIO TRUST


Notice of Receipt of and Availability for Public Comment on an 
Application for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Site; The 
Presidio of San Francisco, California

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the Presidio Trust's receipt of and 
availability for public comment on an application from Nextel 
Communications (``Nextel'') for a wireless telecommunications 
facilities site (the ``Project'') in The Presidio of San Francisco. The 
proposed location of the Project is directly above the north entrance 
of the MacArthur Tunnel and adjacent to Park Boulevard near Amatury 
Loop, San Francisco, California (the ``Project Site'').
    The Project involves placing a Yagi cellular antenna and a one-
story equipment cabinet at the Project Site. The cellular antenna will 
be approximately six inches by 30 inches in size. The equipment cabinet 
will be five feet wide by 13 feet long by six feet tall and will sit on 
a ten-inch concrete pad. The equipment cabinet will be surrounded by a 
seven-foot high, black plastic clad chain link fence. Some grading of 
the area around the Project Site will be required; additional planting 
to camouflage the equipment cabinet will be performed, altering the 
historic ground cover and vegetation. Both telecommunication 
connectivity and electrical power for the Project will be provided 
through new underground cables connected to existing infrastructure.
    Comments: Comments on the proposed Project must be sent to Devon 
Danz, Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, 
CA 94129-0052, and be received by August 4, 2000. A copy of Nextel's 
application is available upon request to the Presidio Trust.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Devon Danz, Presidio Trust, 34 Graham 
Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052. Telephone: 415-
561-5300.

    Dated: June 26, 2000.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-16550 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Governor Greg Abbott in his official capacity as the Governor of

Texas v. County of Fort Bend, Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00453

- CV

Trial court case number: 21

- DCV

- 286148

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

On August 12, 2022, Assistant Attorney General Cody C. Coll filed an unopposed motion to withdraw as counsel of record for appellant Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, in the above

- referenced appeal. The motion to withdraw is GRANTED

.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to note on the docket of this Court that Assistant Attorney General Cody C. Coll has withdrawn from repre senting appellant and that Assistant Attorney General Benjamin Dower is counsel of record for appellant.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s Sarah Beth Landau

Acting individually

Date: August 30, 2022
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATION



I, John C. Fanning, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of COMFORCE Corporation, hereby certify that:



1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in
this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: November 4, 2004



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ John C. Fanning                 
|John C. Fanning,                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40686-40687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4455-C-04]


Notice of Annual Factors for Determining Public Housing Agency 
Ongoing Administrative Fees for the Housing Choice Voucher Program and 
the Rental Certificate and Moderate Rehabilitation Programs; Technical 
Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian 
Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Notice; technical corrections.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice corrects an incorrect date that appeared in the 
notice published on May 22, 2000.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 30, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerald J. Benoit, Director, Real 
Estate

[[Page 40687]]

and Housing Performance Division, Office of Public and Assisted Housing 
Delivery, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 4210, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, 
DC 20410-8000; telephone number (202) 708-0477 (this is not a toll-free 
telephone number). Hearing or speech impaired individuals may access 
this number via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay 
Service at 1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice corrects an incorrect date that 
appeared in the notice published on May 22, 2000 (65 FR 32116). The 
primary purpose of the May 22, 2000 notice was to transmit changes to 
the monthly Administrative Fee Amounts of certain areas listed in the 
Federal Register notice published on February 25, 2000 (65 FR 10316). 
These changes were necessary to correct a computer programming error 
that caused a small reduction in the fees for certain areas listed in 
the February 25, 2000 notice.
    The May 22, 2000 notice, however, also contained an error. This 
notice referred to the ``merger date'' of the Housing Choice Voucher 
Program as October 1, 1998 (see 65 FR 32116, third column). The merger 
date is October 1, 1999. Through publication of this notice, HUD 
acknowledges this error and advises that the correct ``merger date'' is 
October 1, 1999.

    Dated: June 23, 2000.
Gloria Cousar,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Assisted Housing Delivery.
[FR Doc. 00-16529 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-33-P
#### § 301-70.602 How often must we reevaluate the payment of transportation and subsistence expenses to a threatened law enforcement/investigative employee?

You must reevaluate the situation every 30 days based on the same factors you considered when you first authorized the payment of the expenses.
#### § 128-50.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes the policies for the storage and care of seized personal property; the preparation and maintenance of inventory records of its seized personal property; the conducting of periodic internal reviews; and the investigation of any discrepancy between the inventory records and the actual amount of its seized personal property.
Memorandum UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

Subject: Summary ofStakeholder Meetings From: John Bradfield OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

To: Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-6002, EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603, and EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495 This memorandum summarizes meetings held with stakeholders in the month of December, 2014 On December 10, Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan metwith Lyle Witham of Basin Electric Power Company. Mr. Culligan generally answered basic questions aboutthe clean power plan proposal forexisting sources. On December 15, Clean Air Markets Division Director Reid Harvey and Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan metwith the Georgia Environmental Protection Department. Meeting materials and attendees attached. EPA generally answered basic questions aboutthe clean power plan proposal forexisting sources. On December 16, Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan metwith Conrad Schneiderofthe Clean AirTask Force (CATF). Mr. Culligan generally answered basic questions aboutthe clean power plan proposal forexisting sources. On December 18, Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan metwith George Peridas ofthe Natrual Resources Defense Counsel (NRDC). Mr. Culligan generally answered basic questions aboutthe clean power plan proposal forexisting sources.

InternetAddress (U RL) • http://www

.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6725-2]


Science Advisory Board; Emergency Notification of Rescheduled 
Public Advisory Committee Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, 
notice is hereby given that the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee 
(CASAC) teleconference meeting scheduled for Monday, June 26, 2000 from 
11 a.m. to 12 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time has been rescheduled to 
Wednesday, July 5, 2000. The purpose of the teleconference meeting is 
to review a report developed by its Technical Subcommittee on Fine 
Particle Monitoring. The meeting will be coordinated through a 
conference call connection in Room 6013 in the USEPA, Ariel Rios 
Building North, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460. 
Other than the change in date, no other changes in the details of the 
meeting have been made. Details are contained in 65 FR 36691, June 9, 
2000.

    Dated: June 21, 2000.
A. Robert Flaak,
Acting Staff Director, Science Advisory Board.
[FR Doc. 00-16165 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# Comments on: 18-1686: DEXCOM, INC. v. AGAMATRIX, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
No. 11-5030.

#### Bowers *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
28 January 2016

430P15

#### State v. Omar Jackson

Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Denied 01/05/2016
EXHIBIT 10.23


                       AMENDMENT TO CONSENT AND AMENDMENT



         This Amendment to the Consent and Amendment, dated as of January 31,
1997, is between Tel-Save, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation ("TS"), and Group
Long Distance, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company") (collectively, the
"Parties").

         WHEREAS, TS and the Company entered into that certain Consent and
Amendment, dated as of December 2, 1996 (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the Parties have been negotiating in good faith, and the
Company has requested, and TS is prepared to agree to, certain amendments to,
the Agreement on the terms and conditions herein set forth;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements,
provisions and covenants herein contained and other good and valuable
consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties
hereby agree as follows:


         A.       The Agreement


         1. The Agreement is amended as follows, such amendments to be, for all
purposes, effective as of December 2, 1996:


            (a)      The term "Early Payment Date" shall mean March 15, 1997.


            (b)      Section A.(1)(d), which amended the Advance Agreement (as
                     defined in the Agreement), is hereby amended to delete such
                     section and substitute therefor in its entirety the
                     following:



                     "(d) Section 2(d)(iii) thereof is amended to substitute for
                     the phrase "the ninetieth (90th) day after the date of this
                     Agreement" the phrase "March 1, 1997".



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.


                                               GROUP LONG DISTANCE, INC.


                                               By:  /s/ Gerald M. Dunne, Jr.
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    Gerald M. Dunne, Jr.
                                                    Chief Executive Officer



                                               TEL-SAVE, INC.


                                               By:   /s/
                                                     ---------------------------
                                               Name:
                                               Title:

                                      10.23-1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6497

SHERMAN D. PAYNE-EL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, FCI Cumberland, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-150-WMN) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherman D. Payne-El, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s motion to file a supplemental informal brief, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Payne-El v. Warden , No. CA-98-150-WMN (D. Md. Mar. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Comments on: 19-1133: BIOGEN MA INC. v. EMD SERONO, INC. [ERRATA], Nonprecedential
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.244 Designation of a settlement officer. ( a ) Parties may request that the presiding officer appoint a settlement officer to facilitate the resolution of the case by settlement.
( b ) Where all parties in a case agree that such procedures may be beneficial, such requests may be filed with the presiding officer no later than 15 days prior to the date scheduled for the commencement of hearings or, in hearing proceedings conducted pursuant to §§ 1.370 through 1.377, no later than 15 days before the date set as the deadline for filing the affirmative case. The presiding officer shall suspend the procedural dates in the case pending action upon such requests.
( c ) If, in the discretion of the presiding officer, it appears that the appointment of a settlement officer will facilitate the settlement of the case, the presiding officer shall appoint a “neutral” as defined in 5 U.S.C. 571 and 573 to act as the settlement officer. ( 1 ) The parties may request the appointment of a settlement officer of their own choosing so long as that person is a “neutral” as defined in 5 U.S.C. 571 and 573.
( 2 ) The appointment of a settlement officer in a particular case is subject to the approval of all the parties in the proceeding.
( 3 ) Neither the Commission, nor any sitting members of the Commission, nor the presiding officer shall serve as the settlement officer in any case.
( 4 ) Other members of the Commission's staff who qualify as neutrals may be appointed as settlement officers. The presiding officer shall not appoint a member of the Commission's staff as a settlement officer in any case if the staff member's duties include, or have included, drafting, reviewing, and/or recommending actions on the merits of the issues designated for hearing in that case.
( d ) The settlement officer shall have the authority to require parties to submit their written direct cases for review. The settlement officer may also meet with the parties and/or their counsel, individually and/or at joint conferences, to discuss their cases and the cases of their competitors. All such meetings will be off-the-record, and the settlement officer may express an opinion as to the relative merit of the parties' positions and recommend possible means to resolve the proceeding by settlement. The proceedings before the settlement officer shall be subject to the confidentiality provisions of 5 U.S.C. 574. Moreover, no statements, offers of settlement, representations or concessions of the parties or opinions expressed by the settlement officer will be admissible as evidence in any Commission proceeding.
[85 FR 63176, Oct. 6, 2020]
#### § 10.480 Language support.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 88 FR 86837, Dec. 15, 2023.

Participating CMS Providers are required to transmit WEA Alert Messages that are issued in the Spanish language or that contain Spanish-language characters.

[81 FR 75726, Nov. 1, 2016]