alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

**MICHAEL S. KLINGENSMITH,**

**Petitioner**

**v. HONORABLE DEBRA A. PEZZE, JUDGE**  **WESTMORELAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA,**  **Respondent :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 97 WM 2015**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 7th day of March, 2016, the Application for Lea ve to File Original** 

**Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is** GRANTED **to the**

**extent it seeks relief relative to the overdue transmit tal of the record.**  **The Superior Court has issued three orders directing the Court of Common Pleas**  **of Westmoreland County to transmit the record relati ve to Petitioner’s pending appeal.**  See Commonwealth v. Klingensmith **, 1120 WDA 2013 (orders dated 4/28/2014; 11/05/2014; and 03/09/2015). The common pleas court h**  **as not complied. As such, the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County is**  DIRECTED **to transmit the record to the Superior Court within 15 days and provide not**  **ice to this Court of that transmittal.**

**Jurisdiction is** RETAINED **pending receipt of the notice that transmittal has**

**occurred. The Prothonotary is**  DIRECTED **to strike the name of the jurist from the caption and to serve this order on both the President Judge of**  **the Superior Court and the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmo**  **reland County. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or**  **decision of this matter.**
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4364

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14 (legislative day, JULY 11), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science,

and Transportation

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to transfer administrative jurisdiction over certain lands for inclusion in

the Cape Hatteras National Seashore.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF OCRACOKE LIGHT STATION TO

4 SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.

5 The Secretary of Transportation shall transfer ad6 ministrative jurisdiction over the Federal property, con7 sisting of approximately 2 acres, known as the Ocracoke

8 Light Station, to the Secretary of the Interior, subject to

9 such reservations, terms, and conditions as may be nec10 essary for Coast Guard purposes. All property so trans-
2

•HR 4364 RFS

1 ferred shall be included in and administered as part of

2 the Cape Hatteras National Seashore.

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
§ 302-7.303 When may my agency authorize the shipment of UAB by expedited means? Your agency may authorize the shipment of UAB by expedited means when: ( a ) Shipment by a lower cost mode cannot deliver the items being shipped by the time they will be needed by the employee and/or the employee's immediate family; or
( b ) You certify that expedited shipment of your UAB is necessary to carry out your assigned duties; or
( c ) Your agency determines that an expedited shipment is necessary to prevent undue hardship to you and members of your immediate family.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**
 **OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 
 I, Michael J. LaVelle, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Analysts International Corporation (the Registrant); 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing equivalent function): 
 a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 Dated: August 11, 2004
By:
/s/ Michael J. LaVelleMichael J. LaVelleChief Executive Officer
No. 11-9612.

#### Bell *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 102-34.155 What are the types of motor vehicle identification exemptions? The types of motor vehicle identification exemptions are: ( a ) Limited exemption.
( b ) Unlimited exemption.
( c ) Special exemption.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

An executive/administration meeting for DoD Healthcare Quality Initiatives Review Panel has been scheduled for July 6 & 7, 2000. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice set forth the meeting of the DoD Healthcare Quality Initiatives Review Panel. Notice of meeting is required under The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).

# DATES:

July 6 & 7, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

Sheraton Crystal City, 1800 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202.

# TIME:

July 6th, 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.; July 7th, 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For information please contact Gia Edmonds at (703) 933-8325.

Dated: June 23, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-16578  Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
§ 0.361 Authority delegated. The Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, is delegated authority to perform all functions of the Bureau, described in § 0.141, provided that the following matters shall be referred to the Commission en banc for disposition: ( a ) Notices of proposed rulemaking and of inquiry and final orders in such proceedings.
( b ) Application for review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority, except that the Chief of Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau may dismiss any such application that does not contain any statement required under § 1.115(a) or (b) of this chapter, or does not comply with the filing requirements of § 1.115(d) or (f) of this chapter.
( c ) Matters that present novel questions of law, fact or policy that cannot be resolved under existing precedents and guidelines.
[64 FR 60722, Nov. 8, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 13221, Mar. 21, 2002; 86 FR 12547, Mar. 4, 2021]
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen C. Donnelly,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Stephen C. DonnellyChief
      Financial OfficerJanuary
      20, 2009
#### § 301-51.103 What is my liability if I lose a GTR?

You are liable for any Government expenditure that is caused by your negligence in safeguarding the GTR or tickets received in exchange for the GTR. To avoid liability, immediately report a lost or stolen GTR to your administrative office. If the lost or stolen GTR shows the carrier service desired, and point of origin, promptly notify in writing the named carrier and other local initial carriers. Do not use a GTR that is recovered after having been reported as lost or stolen. Instead, report the recovered GTR to your administrative office.

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15968, Apr. 1, 1998; 63 FR 35538, June 30, 1998]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50217 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LORENZO MIRANDA-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-1403-1-EP

-------------------- August 22, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Lorenzo Miranda-Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the UnitedStates after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. MirandaRamirez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Miranda-Ramirez maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which chargedNo. 02-50217 -2- only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Miranda-Ramirez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Analysts International Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2008, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), theundersigned, Randy W. Strobel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 10, 2008 | By:    | /s/  Randy W. Strobel                          |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                           |                  | Randy  W. Strobel                              |
|                           |                  | Chief  Financial Officer                       |
|                           |                  | (Principal  Financial and  Accounting Officer) |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Sequence:  2
Description:  Financial Data Schedule

ARTICLE: 5
 This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2000 and
consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000006494
<NAME>                        Andrea Electronics Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                          3,466,323
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,793,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                      202,521
<INVENTORY>                                     6,477,682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,010,187
<PP&E>                                          1,493,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,816,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 42,673,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,227,434
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           4,821,069
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        6,933,786
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,446,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   42,673,530
<SALES>                                        11,701,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,701,688
<CGS>                                           8,537,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   8,537,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                6,634,327
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (152,103)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,006,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,006,072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,006,072)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.53)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

OF
PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the Issuer). This certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification
accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Issuer for the annual period ended December 31, 2008.

I, Michael R. Sayre, certify that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

This certification is executed as
of March 20, 2009.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/S/    MICHAEL R.
SAYRE
|Name:                   |  | Michael R. Sayre       
|Title:                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### § 102-41.105 What happens to voluntarily abandoned personal property when reported to GSA?

Voluntarily abandoned personal property reported to GSA will be made available for transfer, donation, sale, or abandonment/destruction in accordance with parts 102-36, 102-37, 102-38, and §§ 102-36.305 through 102-36.330 of this subchapter B, respectively. You must follow the additional provisions of §§ 102-41.190 through 102-41.235 and part 101-42 of Chapter 101, Federal Property Management Regulations in this title when disposing of firearms and other property requiring special handling.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 1, 2016

d0628 

# Order

Clerk July 1, 2016

153953 & (17)

MARK P. DONALDSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 153953

COA: 333210

Roscommon CC: 15

- 722718

- AA;

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 15

- 722726

- AA

HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of LipidViro Tech, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I
Kenneth P. Hamik, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: 5/18/2005                           /s/Kenneth P. Hamik
      -----------                          -------------------------------
                                           Kenneth P. Hamik
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Director
EX-10.18





 Exhibit 10.18 

2020 Sales Plan 
 Execution
date: August 29, 2019               
 Agreement No.:

 Party A: EHang Intelligent Equipment (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. 

Party B: Shanghai Kunxiang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. 

WHEREAS, Party A and Party B executed the Distribution Agreement (hereinafter abbreviated as the “Master Agreement”) on February 1, 2019. On the
basis of equality, free will and mutual understanding, and through mutual consultations and consents, the two parties hereby confirm that Party A shall sell [105] units of EHang Passenger-grade Autonomous Aerial Vehicle to Party B in the year of
2020. Provided that there is any conflict between the sales plan specified in this Agreement and the annual sales target stipulated in the Master Agreement, this sales plan shall prevail. The effectiveness of any other provisions of the Master
Agreement shall not be influenced by this sales plan. The interpretation, performance, default, termination and effectiveness related with this sales plan are governed by the laws of the People’s Republic of China without regard to its conflict
of law principles. 
 [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank. Signature page follows.] 

Party A: EHang Intelligent Equipment (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. 

/s/ Seal of EHang Intelligent Equipment (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. 

Signature of legal representative or authorized representative: 

Party B: Shanghai Kunxiang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. 

/s/ Seal of Shanghai Kunxiang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. 

Signature of legal representative or authorized representative:
§ 102-37.130 What are a SASP's responsibilities in the donation of surplus property? As a SASP, your responsibilities in the donation of surplus property are to: ( a ) Determine whether or not an entity seeking to obtain surplus property is eligible for donation as a: ( 1 ) Public agency;
( 2 ) Nonprofit educational or public health institution; or
( 3 ) Program for older individuals.
( b ) Distribute surplus property fairly, equitably, and promptly to eligible donees in your State based on their relative needs and resources, and ability to use the property, and as provided in your State plan of operation.
( c ) Enforce compliance with the terms and conditions imposed on donated property.
201PA12-3

#### Dickson, *et al.*v. Rucho, *et al.*

Pits’ Petition for Rehearing

Special Order 02/11/2016