alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 105-70.039 Appeal to Authority Head. ( a ) Any defendant who has filed a timely answer and who is determined in an initial decision to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment may appeal such decision to the Authority Head by filing a notice of appeal with the Authority Head in accordance with this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) A notice of appeal may be filed at any time within 30 days after the ALJ issues an initial decision. However, if another party files a motion for reconsideration under § 105-70.038, consideration of the appeal shall be stayed automatically pending resolution of the motion for reconsideration.
( 2 ) If a motion for reconsideration is timely filed, a notice of appeal may be filed within 30 days after the ALJ denies the motion or issues a revised initial decision, whichever applies.
( 3 ) The Authority Head may extend the initial 30 day period for an additional 30 days if the defendant files with the Authority Head a request for an extension within the initial 30 day period and shows good cause.
( c ) If the defendant files a timely notice of appeal with the Authority Head and the time for filing motions for reconsideration under § 105-70.038 has expired, the ALJ shall forward the record of the proceeding to the Authority Head.
( d ) A notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a written brief specifying exceptions to the initial decision and reasons supporting the exceptions.
( e ) The representative for the Authority may file a brief in opposition to exceptions within 30 days of receiving the notice of appeal and accompanying brief.
( f ) There is no right to appear personally before the Authority Head.
( g ) There is no right to appeal any interlocutory ruling by the ALJ.
( h ) In reviewing the initial decision, the Authority Head shall not consider any objection that was not raised before the ALJ unless a demonstration is made of extraordinary circumstances causing the failure to raise the objection.
( i ) If any party demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Authority Head that additional evidence not presented at such hearing is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to present such evidence at such hearing, the Authority Head shall remand the matter to the ALJ for consideration of such additional evidence.
( j ) The Authority Head may affirm, reduce, reverse, compromise, remand, or settle any penalty or assessment, determined by the ALJ in any initial decision.
( k ) The Authority Head shall promptly serve each party to the appeal with a copy of the decision of the Authority Head and a statement describing the right of any person determined to be liable for a penalty or assessment to seek judicial review.
( l ) Unless a petition for review is filed as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3805 after a defendant has exhausted all administrative remedies under this part and within 60 days after the date on which the Authority Head serves the defendant with a copy of the Authority Head's decision, a determination that a defendant is liable under § 105-70.003 is final and is not subject to judicial review.
**Exhibit 13****Section 906 Certification**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code ) each of the undersigned officers ofNational Grid plc, a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the“Company”), hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge, that:The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ending March 31, 2007(the “Report”) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   June 19, 2007 /s/ Steve Holliday
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PAYRANGE INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

KIOSOFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, TECHTREX, 

INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2023-2378

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida in No. 1:20-cv-20970-LFL, 

Judge Lauren F. Louis.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

PayRange Inc. moves unopposed to voluntarily dismiss 

this appeal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the 

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The court generally does not specify whether a dismissal of an appeal is with prejudice.

Case: 23-2378 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 02/06/2024
2 PAYRANGE INC. v. KIOSOFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is reactivated.

(2) The motion is granted to the extent that the appeal 

is dismissed.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

February 6, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: February 6, 2024

 

Case: 23-2378 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 02/06/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                             717
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                       460
<INVENTORY>                                     48,462
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           9,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        19,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,778
<SALES>                                         14,769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,520
<CGS>                                            9,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,386
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,478
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .90
        

</TABLE>
Contacts. With whom outsidethe FAA hasthis proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Date Response

Contacted TCCA Helen Tsai 3/18/10 Email
SA Joe Watson 3/22/10 Phone 

# I RAA Dave Lotterer 3/22/10 Voicemail 

# I



# l
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4365

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to repeal the requirement

that employers report information to the Medicare and Medicaid Coverage Data Bank.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1994

Mr. POMEROY (for himself, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin, Mr. COPPERSMITH,

Mr. HAMBURG, Mr. MINGE, Ms. SHEPHERD, Mrs. THURMAN, and Mr.

PASTOR) introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to repeal

the requirement that employers report information to

the Medicare and Medicaid Coverage Data Bank.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa4 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4365 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF EMPLOYER REPORTING REQUIRE2 MENT UNDER MEDICARE AND MEDICAID

3 COVERAGE DATA BANK.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1144 of the Social Secu5 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–14), as added by section

6 13581(a) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of

7 1993 (hereafter referred to as ‘‘OBRA–1993’’), is amend8 ed—

9 (1) by striking subsection (c); and

10 (2) by redesignating subsections (d) and (f) as

11 subsections (c) and (d), respectively.

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1144 of

13 such Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–14) is further amended—

14 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘and sub15 section (c)’’;

16 (2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘1998—’’

17 and all that follows and inserting the following:

18 ‘‘1998, (subject to the restriction in subparagraph

19 (D)(i) of section 6103(l)(12) of the Internal Revenue

20 Code of 1986) to disclose any information in the

21 Data Bank obtained pursuant to such section solely

22 for the purposes of such section.’’; and

23 (3) in subsection (d) (as redesignated by sub24 section (a)(2)), by striking paragraphs (3) and (4).
3

•HR 4365 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect

3 January 1, 1994.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.10008 What are ICFS file numbers? ( a ) We assign file numbers to electronic applications in order to facilitate processing.
( b ) We only assign file numbers for administrative convenience; they do not mean that an application is acceptable for filing.
( c ) For a description of file number information, see The International Bureau Filing System File Number Format Public Notice, DA-04-568 (released February 27, 2004).
[69 FR 29895, May 26, 2004, as amended at 88 FR 21437, Apr. 10, 2023]
Exhibit 4.1(a)



          Specimen of Celebrity Entertainment Group, Inc., Common Stock
                                  Certificate



                               [GRAPHIC  OMITED]

================================================================================


                       INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
                                STATE OF WYCOMING

                       CELEBRITY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
          100,000,000 AUTHORIZED SHARES $0.001 PAR VALUE NON-ASSESSABLE



THIS  CERTIFIES  THAT             ** Specimen**

IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF


Shares  of           CELEBRITY  ENTERTAINMENT  GROUP,  INC.        Common  Stock
Transferable  on  the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or
by  duly  authorized  attorney  upon  surrender  of  this  Certificate  properly
endorsed.  This  Certificate  is  not  valid until countersigned by the Transfer
Agent  and  registered  by  the  Registrar.

     WITNESS  the  facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signature
of  its  duly  authorized  officers.



       ----------------------       Corporate           --------------------
            SECRETARY              |  SEAL  |                PRESIDENT

================================================================================


                                     - 49 -
<PAGE>
No. 11-229.

#### Brown *v.*Hawaii et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
§ 62.65 Procedure for reporting defects and discrepancies. ( a ) Mariners should notify the nearest Coast Guard facility immediately of any observed aids to navigation defects or discrepancies.
( b ) The Coast Guard cannot monitor the many thousands of aids in the U.S. Aids to Navigation System simultaneously and continuously. As a result, it is not possible to maintain every aid operating properly and on its charted position at all times. Marine safety will be enhanced if persons finding aids missing, sunk, capsized, damaged, off station, or showing characteristics other than those advertised in the Light List, or other publication, promptly inform the Coast Guard. When making the report to the Coast Guard the mariner should consult the Light List to ensure the correct geographical information is used due to the similarity of names and geographical areas.
( c ) Procedures for reporting defects and discrepancies: ( 1 ) *Radio messages* should be prefixed “Coast Guard” and transmitted directly to a Government shore radio station listed in Chapter three of Radio Navigation Aids Publication, 117, for relay to the relevant District Commander.
( 2 ) Telephone, e-mail, or facsimile messages may also be used to advise the nearest Coast Guard unit of defects or discrepancies in aids to navigation.
( 3 ) Via our Web portal at *http://www.navcen.uscg.gov .*
[CGD 86-031, 52 FR 42640, Nov. 6, 1987, as amended by USCG-2000-7223, 65 FR 40054, June 29, 2000; USCG-2001-9286, 66 FR 33640, June 25, 2001; USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24982, May 5, 2004; USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35002, June 19, 2008]
§ 105-72.803 Collection of amounts due. ( a ) Any funds paid to a recipient in excess of the amount to which the recipient is finally determined to be entitled under the terms and conditions of the award constitute a debt to the Federal Government. If not paid within a reasonable period after the demand for payment, the Federal awarding agency may reduce the debt by paragraph (a) (1), (2) or (3) of this section. ( 1 ) Making an administrative offset against other requests for reimbursements.
( 2 ) Withholding advance payments otherwise due to the recipient.
( 3 ) Taking other action permitted by statute.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided by law, the Federal awarding agency shall charge interest on an overdue debt in accordance with 4 CFR Chapter II, Federal Claims Collection Standards.
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 250-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2024 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 250-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2024 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 250-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2024 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 250-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2024 Page 4 of 4
No. 11-24.

#### Mitchell *v.*Tennessee.

Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certio-rari denied.
#### § 60-742.1 Purpose and application.

The purpose of this part is to implement procedures for processing and resolving complaints/charges of employment discrimination filed against employers holding government contracts or subcontracts, where the complaints/charges fall within the jurisdiction of both section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (hereinafter “Section 503”) and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (hereinafter “ADA”). The promulgation of this part is required pursuant to section 107(b) of the ADA. Nothing in this part should be deemed to affect the Department of Labor's (hereinafter “DOL”) Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs' (hereinafter “OFCCP”) conduct of compliance reviews of government contractors and subcontractors under section 503. Nothing in this part is intended to create rights in any person.
#### § 160.305 Exceptions.

Requirements in this subpart do not apply to crewmembers and operators on a vessel bound for a U.S. port or place of destination under *force majeure.*
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

July 1, 2 014

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No

. 14

- 8003

MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,

Plaintiff

- Appell ant

,

v.

AU OPTRONICS CORP., et al.

, Defendants

- Appell ees

. Petition for Leave to take an

Interlocutory Appeal from the

United States District Court for

the Northern District of Illinois,

Ea stern Division.

No

. 0 9 C 6610

Joan B. Gottschall, Judge

.

O R D E R

The panel has decided to rehear this appeal. The panel’s opinion and judgment of

March 27, 2014 , are hereby vacated. By separate order, the court will fix a deadline for

the filing of supplemental briefs and set a date for oral argument.
No. 11-978.

#### Sullivan et al. *v.*CUNA Mutual Insurance Society et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001101851
<NAME> THE CREDIT STORE INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,423,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,763,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,087,521
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      12,279,639
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,489,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,338,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     19,139,028
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 27,000,000
<COMMON>                                        34,762
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,660,294)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,388,192
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,386,627
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,693,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             5,680,975
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,981,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,029,820
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,042,375
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,072,195
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,072,195
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
#### § 128-1.5005 Delegations of authority.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

STATON TECHIYA, LLC,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

Appellees

______________________

2023-2387

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022-

00253.

-------------------------------------------------

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

Appellants

v.

STATON TECHIYA, LLC,

Appellee

______________________

2023-2422

______________________

Case: 23-2387 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 02/06/2024
2 STATON TECHIYA, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022-

00253.

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint stipulation of 

voluntary dismissal of the cross-appeal, Appeal No. 2023-

2422, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 

42(b),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Appeal No. 2023-2422 is dismissed. The revised official caption for the remaining appeal, Appeal No. 2023-

2387, is reflected in this order.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs as to Appeal No. 

2023-2422.

(3) Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s response brief in Appeal No. 2023-

2387 is due no later than February 14, 2024.

(4) The Clerk of Court shall transmit a copy of this order to the merits panel assigned to Appeal No. 2023-2387.

February 6, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2023-2422 only): 

February 6, 2024

Case: 23-2387 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 02/06/2024
EXHIBIT 13.1

RULE 13a-14(b) CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code ) each of the undersigned officers of National Grid plc, a public limited company incorporated
under the laws of England and Wales (the Company), hereby certifies to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ending 31 March 2015 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: 5 June 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ Steve Holliday     
|                  |  |  |  | Steve Holliday         
|                  |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive 
|                  |  |  |  | National Grid plc      
|                  |  | 
|Date: 5 June 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ Andrew Bonfield    
|                  |  |  |  | Andrew Bonfield        
|                  |  |  |  | Title: Finance Director
|                  |  |  |  | National Grid plc
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

YOHANNES W. WILDER, 

Claimant-Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs, 

Respondent-Appellee

______________________

2023-2123

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 21-4266, Judge Joseph L. Toth. 

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 23-2123 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 11/20/2023
2 WILDER V. MCDONOUGH 

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

November 20, 2023

Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 20, 2023

Case: 23-2123 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 11/20/2023