alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 

Summary of 2017 Cash Bonus Plan

 

Target bonuses for named executive officers of AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) under the 2017 Cash Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) will range from 35% to 55% of such executive’s 2017 base salary. The amount of cash bonus, if any, for each named executive officer will be based on both the named executive officer achieving his or her individual performance goals and on the Company meeting the 2017 corporate objectives approved by the Board. The 2017 corporate objectives are primarily related to product development of DSUVIATM (known as ARX-04 outside the United States) and ZALVISO® leading towards regulatory submissions, support of Grunenthal's commercial efforts in Europe and financial objectives. The target bonuses for the Company’s named executive officers for 2017 are as follows:

 

 

	
Named Executive Officer 

 


 
	 	
Target Bonus (as a % of FY 2017 Base Salary)

 

 

 
	 
	
Howard B. Rosen 55%
	 	 	55%	
 

	
Timothy E. Morris 40%
	 	 	40%	
 

	
Pamela P. Palmer, M.D., Ph.D. 40%
	 	 	40%	
 

	
Badri Dasu 35%
	 	 	35%	
 

	
Lawrence G. Hamel 35%
	 	 	35%	
 



 

 

Mr. Rosen’s cash bonus under the Plan shall be based 100% on the achievement of the 2017 corporate objectives. The cash bonus for all other named executive officers shall be based 40% on the achievement of his or her individual performance goals, as determined by the Board, and 60% on the achievement of the 2017 corporate objectives. The named executive officers’ actual bonuses may exceed 100% of target in the event performance exceeds the predetermined goals.
H. R. 4177

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 1601 Highway 35

in Middletown, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Candace White Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States Post Office building located at 1601 Highway

35 in Middletown, New Jersey, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Candace White Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the building referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Candace

White Post Office.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 302-3.206 If I am re-employed after a separation by reduction in force or transfer of functions, may my agency pay me a relocation allowance? Yes, if you are re-employed after a separation by reduction in force or transfer of function, your agency may pay you a relocation allowance under the conditions of this chapter if: ( a ) You are employed within one year of your involuntary separation date;
( b ) Your new appointment is not temporary; and
( c ) Your new appointment is at a different duty station from where your separation occurred and meets the mileage criteria in § 302-2.6 of this chapter for short distance relocation.
Case 9:22-cv-81973-AMC Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2022 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 15.1

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts(1)



|                                  |  |                 |  |                   |  |                       |  |                
|--------------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ----------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ---------------
|Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |  | Opening Balance |  | Charged toExpense |  | Charged AgainstIncome |  | Closing Balance
|Deferred tax valuation allowance  |  |                 |  |                   |  |                       |  |                
|                                  |  |                 |  |                  
|December 31, 2006                 |  | 5,923           |  |                  |  | 5,923                 |  |               
|                                  |  |                 |  |                  
|December 31, 2005                 |  | 6,028           |  |                  |  | 105                   |  | 5,923          
|                                  |  |                 |  |                  
|December 31, 2004                 |  | 6,290           |  |                  |  | 262                   |  | 6,028          

---

|(1) | In thousands of U.S.$ as of December 31, 2006.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------
#### § 301-11.4 May I be reimbursed actual expense and per diem on the same trip?

Yes, you may be reimbursed both actual expense and per diem during a single trip, but only one method of reimbursement may be authorized for any given calendar day except as provided in § 301-11.305 or § 301-11.306. Your agency must determine when the transition between the reimbursement methods occurs.
#### LOUIS FRISBIE, Respondent, v. JAMES R. YOUNG, Appellant.

*Besident witness*— *exempt*— from, *arrest on process*— *not from service of summons.*

A resident witness is, while attending examination, exempt from arrest, "but not from the service of process. A different rule applies to non-resident witnesses.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside tbe service of a summons, on tbe ground that tbe same was served while tbe defendant was attending examination as a witness.

*Brodhead <&*Wight, for tbe appellant.

*W. ¡S. Oowles,*for tbe respondent.

Beady, J.:

Tbe defendant was served with a summons while under examination as a witness *de bene esse.*He came from another State here, and. after bis arrival was advised that bis testimony was desired. He consented to appear, and bis examination was arranged by stipulation. It is shown that, if be bad not consented, compulsory *475process would bare been issued. It further appears, however, that he was a resident of this State at the time of the examination, according to his own statement then made, and his absence was, therefore, connected with business. He states, indeed, in the affidavit on which this motion rests, that he was not engaged in business in the city of Chicago, Illinois. As a resident witness, he was exempt *onT/y from, rn'rest*while attending for examination, and not from the service of process. Non-resident witnesses were discharged absolutely. (Graham’s Pr. [2d ed.], 130, and cases cited.) The privilege does not extend to non-bailable process, or process on which no bail is demanded. The cases of *Lamkin*v. *Starkey*(14 N. Y. S. C. R., 479) and *Brett*v. *Brown*(13 Abb. [N. S.], 295) do not conflict with this view. They were cases of non-resident or foreign witnesses, to whom, as we have seen, a different rule applies. The Revised Statutes exonerated witnesses *from*arrest, and subjected the persons arresting them to action and a penalty. (2 R. S., old paging, 402; 3 R. S. [6th ed.], 665.) The defendant being a resident of this State, it follows that he could be served with a summons which did not interfere with .his liberty. It was a non-bailable process.

The order made at Special Term was correct, therefore, and must be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and the disbursements of this appeal.

Davis, P. L, and Daniels, L, concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs, besides disbursements.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

OF PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the Issuer). This certification is made
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Issuer for the annual period ended December 31, 2010.

I, Nicholas J. Tomashot, certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

This certification is executed as of March 11, 2011.



|                            |  |                        
|--------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/S/    NICHOLAS J. TOMASHOT
|Name:                       |  | Nicholas J. Tomashot   
|Title:                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS REPORT

NBS PROJECT NBS REPORT

1103-240-5118 1 January 195& ij-512

Progress Report for October--‘December 1956

on

Research in Applications of Mathematical Statistics to

Problems of the Chemical Corps

(KBS Project 1103-2^-5118)

<NBS>

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

The publication, rep Approved for public release by the

unless permission is director of the National Institute of

25 i d. c. Suchperr Standards and Technology (NIST)

cal ly prepared If th on October 9, 2015

in part, is prohibited

andards, Washington

port has been specifiport for its own use,
C rJ? C 7 -

. -a '

.

'

' , -A-r

; : X

:'>
i§)£s'T~^- O&c,

Progress Report Tor July.-Sept ember 1955

on

Research In Applications of Mathematical Statistics to

Problems of the Chemical Corps

(IBS Project 1103«I*C~5ll8)

This report contains a summary of the work done during

the quarter* Results of this work are briefly stated* Technical reports written in connection with this project are

mentioned but are transmitted separately©

I. Fractional Replication Designs

The catalogue of fractional replicated designs of the cf1

series has been extended to n = 13, llj., 15# 16 factors, and

to fractional replicates of l/6i|., 1/128 9 1/256 of a full

factorial. These results are being combined with those of

IBS Report 3i|-8l for publication in the IBS Applied Mathematics

Series© These latest results are contained in IBS Report hi$12

^Fractional Factorial Designs for the l/2s

x 2n series for

n » 12(1)16 and s 25 6, 7, 8

?t by R.C* Burton* F. L . Miller,

and H.M. Pettigrew- dated 17 July 1955•

II. Combining Statistical Tests of Significance

A manuscript on Exact Tests of Significance for Combining

Intra*» and Interblock Information11 has been written for submission to a technical journal® The SEAC code for computing
£

'
2

th© power of these tests is completed and computation of the

power points is underway*

III* Computation Methods for the Analysis of Variance *

A

A firstr d^ft-of a manuscript on Some Examples of the

Use of High Spoed Computers in Statistics” by J«,M® Cameron

hoa—been prepared for inclusion in the proceedings of th©...

:

” Conference on the design of experiments'' In Army Research

Development and Testing” f

^

v-urw

^ a?

iio-Aasay Tables

J A code for computing U(a, p* h) has been bitten for

S.EAC and the code checked© A note describing the features of

L th© code has been written and will be submitted during January

«

w V« Programming the Calculation of Probabilities Associated

wltlt observed Values' ofdommon 5tatist ieal bests

' ~~

The usual formulas for computing p | T > 9 where T^

is an observed value of some statistic such as t* P ? etc,®^

are not in the best form for computation* Some work has been

don© on seeking an alternate formula for the mechanization of

such computations* A note giving a number of alternate formulas

has been prepared and will be submitted in January*

/

\jb

X 4 ?64
- K

'
<PAGE>

                                    ARTHUR
                                   ANDERSEN


December 6, 1996                                --------------------------------
                                                Arthur Andersen LLP

                                                --------------------------------
Securities and Exchange Commission              Suite 1100
450 Fifth Street, NW                            18500 Von Karman Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20549                          Irvine CA 92612-0504
                                                714 757 3100





Dear Sirs:

We have read Item 4 included in the attached Form 8-K/A dated December 9, 1996,
of Hines Holdings, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and are in agreement with the statements contained therein.

Very truly yours,



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


BAR/612001EE

Copy to:
Ms. Claudia Pieropan, Chief Financial Officer
Hines Holdings, Inc.
Exhibit 32.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Sean M. Healey, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 29, 2018





/s/ SEAN M. HEALEYSean M. HealeyChief Executive Officer and Chairman
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 10C
                                                                     -----------

                                 Amendment No. 2

                                     to the

                       AMERICAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES INC.
                        1998 EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION PLAN



                  WHEREAS, American Precision Industries Inc. (the "Company")
adopted the American Precision Industries Inc. 1998 Employees Stock Option Plan
(the "Plan") effective February 20, 1998, and amended the Plan effective April
24, 1998, and

                  WHEREAS, Section 8.3 of the Plan authorizes the Board of
Directors of the Company (the "Board") to amend the Plan in its discretion,
except to the extent approval of the Company's shareholders would be required by
law, and

                  WHEREAS, on July 24, 1998, the Board approved and authorized
the amendment to the Plan set out below,

                  NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

                  1. A new Section 8.3A is added to the Plan to read as follows:

                                    8.3A RESTRICTIONS ON AMENDMENTS AND GRANTS.
                         Notwithstanding any contradictory provisions of the
                         Plan, and except as provided in Section 7.1 or as
                         approved by the Company's shareholders, an Option may
                         not be amended to reduce the exercise price or
                         cancelled and replaced with another Option having a
                         lower exercise price.

                  2. This amendment is effective July 24, 1998.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this document is executed this 27th day of October,
1998, pursuant to the authorization of the Board of Directors.


                                   AMERICAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES INC.


                                   By /s/ James R. Schwinger
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Vice President - Human Resources




                                       23
### 16Y

OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TRXAR **AUSTIN**

EonorableGeorge **H.** Bhemsr4 coaptroller

of Publlo Amounts Auetin, Texar Dear sir: **apinion HO.**  **040** Rsr F?ayment

of the order o warrant8 in

In yous letter OS ya the dairy Sor the,Auatinstate

LherarmW 0 of any other

Artlola 4586,, **Ve~mnta** OlrU~Statutea, read0 aa follwzrt "All warrants on the Stat0 Trmwmy ahall be genema **warranw,** an4 aihald be on an aqml bsels with oaoh other Oacaspt that in the eventHonorable George H. Sheppard,Page 2
of 0 question an4 the neaeasityarlslnga6 to the priorityof meat of any suoh uarrant, they&all be EL in order of' their aerfal number auoh ruTrant to be numbered at all 

### timer In the orber of reoelving the acoounto in the Cozptrollar'e otfiae.
. . .I Under pour statesentof fmts, in thla situatton there aan be no question and neaesaityarising 88 to the priorityof payment? of warrantrr, for the righta 0r no parson6 othemise entitle4 ta priorityof paymnt of warrant0 held by then OILI

be in any aa::ner

prejudloedby euoh a tramaotlon. You are thereforeadvlae4 that, fn our opin5.on. you may aooept this warrant for deposit, and the Treemaser ~111 be authorizedto "pay" the same "ahead of call" by edjusting ix&f3 aocountta aaaordlngly. Thltr opinion, or oourse,is not to be oonetruedam approving such a transaotionin any situationother than one of the i4entloaltype pre8ented for examinationla your letter. Ycure very truly Al’T3RRFX GENlPZAL

OF TEXAS

AppROVEi;~~ 2, 1940 RwFrGa 

# .u

A~~~~EY GENERAL 0" WXAS
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 431 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 431

      To prohibit discrimination on account of sexual orientation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Waxman (for himself, Mr. Edwards of California, Mrs. Schroeder, Mr. 
  Studds, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, and Mr. Nadler) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on the 
                   Judiciary and Education and Labor

                              June 9, 1994

   Additional sponsors: Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Beilenson, Mr. Berman, Mr. 
   Blackwell, Mr. Brown of California, Mr. Clay, Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. 
  Gonzalez, Mr. Matsui, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Miller of California, Mr. 
 Mineta, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Pastor, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Shays, 
     Mr. Stark, Mrs. Unsoeld, Mr. Vento, Mr. Wheat, Mr. Yates, Ms. 
 Slaughter, Mr. Olver, Mr. Sabo, Mr. Bonior, Miss Collins of Michigan, 
Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Woolsey, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Foglietta, Mr. 
Johnston of Florida, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Fazio, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Meehan, Mr. 
     Dellums, Mrs. Kennelly, Mr. Evans, Mr. Andrews of Maine, Mr. 
Torricelli, Mr. Kreidler, Mr. Deutsch, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. 
  Ford of Michigan, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. Lowey, Ms. Norton, Mrs. Mink, Mr. 
  Dixon, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Richardson, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Hastings, Ms. 
Cantwell, Ms. Margolies-Mezvinsky, Mr. Hochbrueckner, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. 
Hinchey, Ms. Schenk, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Machtley, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Owens, 
           Mr. Rangel, Mr. Filner, Mr. Reed, and Mr. Becerra

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prohibit discrimination on account of sexual orientation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Rights Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

    It shall be unlawful to discriminate against any person--
            (1) in employment, education, credit, or housing;
            (2) in the sale or use of goods or services;
            (3) with respect to any public facility; or
            (4) in any federally assisted program or activity;
on account of that person's sexual orientation, actual or perceived.

                                 <all>
```
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-506.2 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

 Agreements Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and GREECE Extending 

Agreement of July 8, 1990 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Athens 

April 16 and May 6, 2004 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Athens 

March 16 and May 5, 2005 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Athens 

April 25 and May 5, 2006 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Athens 

May 5 and 6, 2007 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Athens 

April 16 and May 6, 2008 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Athens 

August 6 and September 11, 2009 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 GREECE 

 Defense 

Agreements extending the agreement of July 8, 1990. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Athens 

 April 16 and May 6, 2004; 

Entered into force May 6, 2004. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Athens 

 March 16 and May 5, 2005; 

Entered into force May 5, 2005. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Athens 

 April 25 and May 5, 2006; 

Entered into force May 5, 2006. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Athens 

 May 5 and 6, 2007; 

Entered into force May 6, 2007. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Athens 

 April 16 and May 6, 2008; 

Entered into force May 6, 2008. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Athens 

 August 6 and September 11, 2009; 

Entered into force September 11, 2009.