alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered August 7, 2014 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01023-CV 

 IN RE CHARLES A. MILLER, Relator 

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 380-02441-2014 

ORDER 

Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Evans 

Pursuant to the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

habeas corpus. We further DENY relator’s August 7, 2014 motion for temporary relief. We 

ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding. 

/s/ JIM MOSELEY 

 JUSTICE
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1528 Commission review.

Either the applicant or Bureau counsel may seek Commission review of the initial decision on the application, or the Commission may decide to review the decision on its own initiative, in accordance with §§ 1.276 through 1.282 of this chapter. Except as provided in § 1.1525, if neither the applicant nor Bureau counsel seeks review and the Commission does not take review on its own initiative, the initial decision on the application shall become a final decision of the Commission 50 days after it is issued. Whether to review a decision is a matter within the discretion of the Commission. If review is taken, the Commission will issue a final decision on the application or remand the application to the presiding officer (other than the Commission) for further proceedings.

[47 FR 3786, Jan. 27, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 39900, July 31, 1996; 85 FR 63184, Oct. 6, 2020]
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, N. Scott Gillis, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AIG SunAmerica LifeAssurance Company, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 8, 2005     /s/ N. SCOTT GILLIS     N. Scott Gillis    Senior Vice President    Chief Financial Officer
§ 301-30.1 What is emergency travel? Travel which results from: ( a ) Your becoming incapacitated by illness or injury not due to your own misconduct; or
( b ) The death or serious illness of a member of your family; or
( c ) A catastrophic occurrence or impending disaster, such as fire, flood, or act of God, which directly affects your home.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: ADVANCED NUTRITIONAL 

SUPPLEMENTS,

Appellant

______________________ 

2022-1042

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 

88766676.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JEFFREY STURMAN, Sturman Law LLC, Denver, CO, argued for appellant Advanced Nutritional Supplements. 

 DANIEL KAZHDAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States

Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for 

appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by THOMAS 

L. CASAGRANDE, CHRISTINA J. HIEBER, THOMAS W. KRAUSE,

FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Case: 22-1042 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 06/13/2022
 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and STARK, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

June 13, 2022

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 22-1042 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 06/13/2022
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-51139

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS LORA-ROSALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-02-CR-214-1-WWJ

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Jesus Lora-Rosales appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after

deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. LoraRosales contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction

that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a

separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been

alleged in his indictment. Lora-Rosales maintains that he
No. 02-51139

-2-

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Lora-Rosales acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>   0001004539
<NAME>  AIRPLANES LTD
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       24
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (10)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   212
<PP&E>                                           4,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              127
<BONDS>                                          3,313
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,546)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,926
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   464
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    (225)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (32)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (2)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (425)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (220)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (15)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (235)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (235)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 109-38.204-3 Requests for exempted motor vehicles in the District of Columbia.

The Director, Office of Administrative Services is designated to approve requests for regular District of Columbia license tags, and furnishes annually the name and specimen signature of each representative authorized to approve such requests to the District of Columbia Department of Transportation.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70169-70170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27892]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Certification Notice--230]

Notice of Filing of Self-Certification of Coal Capability Under 
the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 21, 2014, Footprint Power Salem Harbor Development 
LP, as owner and operator of a new base load electric powerplant, 
submitted a coal capability self-certification to the Department of 
Energy (DOE) pursuant to 201(d) of the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel 
Use Act of 1978 (FUA), as amended, and DOE regulations in 10 CFR 
501.60, 61. FUA and regulations thereunder require DOE to publish a 
notice of filing of self-certification in the Federal Register. 42 
U.S.C. 8311(d) and 10 CFR 501.61(c).

ADDRESSES: Copies of coal capability self-certification filings are 
available for public inspection, upon request, in the Office of 
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Mail Code OE-20, Room 8G-
024, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20585.

[[Page 70170]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Lawrence at (202) 586-
5260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title II of FUA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 
et seq.), provides that no new base load electric powerplant may be 
constructed or operated without the capability to use coal or another 
alternate fuel as a primary energy source. Pursuant to FUA in order to 
meet the requirement of coal capability, the owner or operator of such 
a facility proposing to use natural gas or petroleum as its primary 
energy source shall certify to the Secretary of Energy (Secretary) 
prior to construction, or prior to operation as a base load electric 
powerplant, that such powerplant has the capability to use coal or 
another alternate fuel. Such certification establishes compliance with 
FUA section 201(a) as of the date it is filed with the Secretary. 42 
U.S.C. 8311.
    The following owner of a proposed new base load electric powerplant 
has filed a self-certification of coal-capability with DOE pursuant to 
FUA section 201(d) and in accordance with DOE regulations in 10 CFR 
501.60, 61:
    OWNER: Footprint Power Salem Harbor Development LP.
    CAPACITY: 630 megawatts (MW).
    PLANT LOCATION: Salem, MA.
    IN-SERVICE DATE: Second quarter of 2017.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 18, 2014.
Brian Mills,
Director, Permitting and Siting, Office of Electricity Delivery and 
Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2014-27892 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 813

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a charitable contribution deduction for certain expenses incurred by whaling captains in

support of Native Alaskan subsistence whaling.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

charitable contribution deduction for certain expenses incurred by whaling captains in support of Native Alaskan

subsistence whaling.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTION DEDUCTION FOR

4 CERTAIN EXPENSES INCURRED IN SUPPORT

5 OF NATIVE ALASKAN SUBSISTENCE WHAL6 ING.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 170 of the Internal Reve8 nue Code of 1986 (relating to charitable, etc., contribu-
2

•HR 813 IH

1 tions and gifts) is amended by redesignating subsection

2 (m) as subsection (n) and by inserting after subsection

3 (l) the following new subsection:

4 ‘‘(m) EXPENSES PAID BY CERTAIN WHALING CAP5 TAINS IN SUPPORT OF NATIVE ALASKAN SUBSISTENCE

6 WHALING.—

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual

8 who is recognized by the Alaska Eskimo Whaling

9 Commission as a whaling captain charged with the

10 responsibility of maintaining and carrying out sanc11 tioned whaling activities and who engages in such

12 activities during the taxable year, the amount de13 scribed in paragraph (2) (to the extent such amount

14 does not exceed $7,500 for the taxable year) shall be

15 treated for purposes of this section as a charitable

16 contribution.

17 ‘‘(2) AMOUNT DESCRIBED.—The amount de18 scribed in this paragraph is the aggregate of the rea19 sonable and necessary whaling expenses paid by the

20 taxpayer during the taxable year in carrying out

21 sanctioned whaling activities. For purposes of the

22 preceding sentence, the term ‘whaling expenses’ in23 cludes expenses for—

24 ‘‘(A) the acquisition and maintenance of

25 boats, weapons, and gear used in the hunt,
3

•HR 813 IH

1 ‘‘(B) the supplying of food for the crew

2 and other provisions for carrying out sanctioned

3 whaling activities, and

4 ‘‘(C) storage and distribution of the catch

5 from such activities.

6 ‘‘(3) SANCTIONED WHALING ACTIVITIES.—For

7 purposes of this subsection, the term ‘sanctioned

8 whaling activities’ means subsistence bowhead whale

9 hunting activities conducted pursuant to the man10 agement plan of the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Com11 mission.’’

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 subsection (a) shall apply to all taxable years beginning

14 before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
423P15

#### State v. Clyde Gary Whisenant

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-607)

1. Allowed 12/30/2015

Dissolved 03/17/2016

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Denied

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Denied

4. Defs Motion to Dismiss PDR

4. Dismissed as moot

5. State’s Petition in the Alternative for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Decision of COA

5. Dismissed as moot

Ervin, J.,

recused
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          74,436
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,181,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,000
<INVENTORY>                                    545,861
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,999,994
<PP&E>                                       4,079,113
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,365,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,043,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,560,787
<BONDS>                                        613,594
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,575
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,697,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,043,942
<SALES>                                      8,914,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,053,321
<CGS>                                        7,588,213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,897,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                172,968
<INCOME-TAX>                                    65,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4200

To amend chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that annuities

for Members of Congress be computed under the same formula as applies

to Federal employees generally, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 13, 1994

Mr. GOODLATTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To amend chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code, to

provide that annuities for Members of Congress be computed under the same formula as applies to Federal

employees generally, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPUTATION OF ANNUITY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8415 of title 5, United

5 States Code, is amended—

6 (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ‘‘or Member’’

7 after ‘‘employee’’; and

8 (2) by repealing subsection (b).
2

•HR 4200 IH

1 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section

2 8468(b)(1)(A) of title 5, United States Code, is amended

3 by striking ‘‘(a)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) and (c)’’.

4 SEC. 2. CONTRIBUTIONS.

5 (a) DEDUCTIONS FROM PAY.—Section 8422(a)(2) of

6 title 5, United States Code, is amended—

7 (1) in subparagraph (A) by inserting ‘‘or Mem8 ber’’ after ‘‘employee)’’; and

9 (2) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘Mem10 ber,’’.

11 (b) GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTIONS.—Section

12 8423(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—

13 (1) in subparagraph (A)(i) by striking ‘‘sub14 paragraph (B)),’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph (B))

15 and Members,’’;

16 (2) in subparagraph (A)(ii) by inserting ‘‘and

17 Members’’ before ‘‘(under’’;

18 (3) in subparagraph (B)(i) by striking ‘‘Mem19 bers,’’; and

20 (4) in subparagraph (B)(ii) by striking ‘‘and

21 Members’’.

22 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; SAVINGS PROVISION.

23 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect as

24 of the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning
3

•HR 4200 IH

1 after the end of the 12-month period beginning on the date

2 of the enactment of this Act.

3 (b) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Any annuity or portion of

4 an annuity computed based on service performed before

5 the effective date of this Act shall be computed in accord6 ance with applicable provisions of law, as in effect imme7 diately before the effective date of this Act.

Æ
§ 60-1.32 Intimidation and interference. ( a ) The contractor, subcontractor or applicant shall not harass, intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual because the individual has engaged in or may engage in any of the following activities: ( 1 ) Filing a complaint;
( 2 ) Assisting or participating in any manner in an investigation, compliance evaluation, hearing, or any other activity related to the administration of the Order or any other Federal, state or local law requiring equal opportunity;
( 3 ) Opposing any act or practice made unlawful by the Order or any other Federal, state or local law requiring equal opportunity; or
( 4 ) Exercising any other right protected by the Order.
( b ) The contractor, subcontractor or applicant shall ensure that all persons under its control do not engage in such harassment, intimidation, threats, coercion or discrimination. The sanctions and penalties contained in this part may be exercised by OFCCP against any contractor, subcontractor or applicant who violates this obligation.
[62 FR 44192, Aug. 19, 1997]
102P13-3

#### State v. Charles Anthony Ball

Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Dismissed