alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16651]



[[Page 40703]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems 
(1205).
    Date/Time: July 20, 2000, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
530, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Jorn Larsen-Basse, Program Director Surface 
Engineering and Material Design, Division of Civil and Mechanical 
Systems, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 545, 
Arlington VA 22230. (703) 306-1361.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations for the FY'00 
Mechanics and Structures of Materials and Surface Engineering and 
Material Design Review Panel as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: June 27, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-16651 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 819

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Maritime Commission for fiscal years 2000 and 2001.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 819

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Maritime

Commission for fiscal years 2000 and 2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 819 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Maritime

3 Commission Authorization Act of 1999’’.

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FED5 ERAL MARITIME COMMISSION.

6 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Fed7 eral Maritime Commission—

8 (1) for fiscal year 2000, $15,685,000; and

9 (2) for fiscal year 2001, $16,312,000.

Passed the House of Representatives March 16,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Comments on: 15-3173: FEDERAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. DEFENSE [ORDER – DENYING PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC], Precedential
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Consolidated Financial Statements at December 31, 1996 (unaudited) and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         3
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1488
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (86)
<INVENTORY>                                    3357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4839
<PP&E>                                         921
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (232)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2570
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       54
<OTHER-SE>                                     2904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5528
<SALES>                                        10977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10977
<CGS>                                          8300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                238
<INCOME-TAX>                                   31
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            207
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   207
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 10D
                                                                     -----------

                                 Amendment No. 2

                                     to the

                       AMERICAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES INC.
                        1995 EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION PLAN



                  WHEREAS, American Precision Industries Inc. (the "Company")
adopted the American Precision Industries Inc. 1995 Employees Stock Option Plan
(the "Plan") effective December 16, 1994, and amended the Plan effective April
24, 1998, and

                  WHEREAS, Article II(e) of the Plan authorizes the Board of
Directors of the Company (the "Board") to amend the Plan in its discretion,
except to the extent approval of the Company's shareholders would be required by
law, and

                  WHEREAS, on July 24, 1998, the Board approved and authorized
the amendment to the Plan set out below,

                  NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

                  1.     A new Article II(h) is added to the Plan to read as 
                         follows:

                                    (h) RESTRICTIONS ON AMENDMENTS AND GRANTS.
                         Notwithstanding any contradictory provisions of the
                         Plan, and except as provided in Article V(e)(vii) or as
                         approved by the Company's shareholders, an Option may
                         not be amended to reduce the exercise price or
                         cancelled and replaced with another Option having a
                         lower exercise price.

                  2.     This amendment is effective July 24, 1998.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this document is executed this 27th day of
October, 1998, pursuant to the authorization of the Board of Directors.


                                   AMERICAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES INC.


                                   By /s/ James R. Schwinger
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Vice President - Human Resources





                                       24
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000005656
<NAME>                                         American Precious Metals, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         100
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         11,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (663)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          49,436
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6937
<OTHER-SE>                                     (38,432)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,004
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,542)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
§ 301-73.300 What is a travel payment system? A system to facilitate the payment of official travel and transportation expenses which includes, but is not limited to: ( a ) Issuance and maintenance of Government contractor-issued individually billed charge cards;
( b ) Establishment of centrally billed accounts for the purchase of travel and transportation services;
( c ) Issuance of travelers checks; and
( d ) Provision of automated-teller-machine (ATM) services worldwide.
[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15978, Apr. 1, 1998; 63 FR 35538, June 30, 1998]
§ 109-40.103-1 Domestic transportation. ( a ) Preferential treatment, normally, shall not be accorded to any mode of transportation (motor, rail, air, water) or to any particular carrier when arranging for domestic transportation services. However where, for valid reasons, a particular mode of transportation or a particular carrier within that mode must be used to meet specific program requirements and/or limitations, only that mode or carrier shall be considered. Examples of valid reasons for considering only a particular mode or carrier are: ( 1 ) Where only a certain mode of transportation or individual carrier is able to provide the needed service or is able to meet the required delivery date; and
( 2 ) Where the consignee's installation and related facilities preclude or are not conducive to service by all modes of transportation.
( b ) The following factors are considered in determining whether a carrier or mode of transportation can meet DOE's transportation service requirements for each individual shipment: ( 1 ) Availability and suitability of carrier equipment;
( 2 ) Carrier terminal facilities at origin and destination;
( 3 ) Pickup and delivery service, if required;
( 4 ) Availability of required or accessorial and special services, if needed;
( 5 ) Estimated time in transit;
( 6 ) Record of past performance of the carrier; and
( 7 ) Availability and suitability of transit privileges.
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Pa

14
#### Mary M. Mariani *vs.*Vincent A. Nanni.

OCTOBER 30, 1962.

Present: Condon, C. J., Roberts, Paolino, Powers and Erost, JJ.

Paolino, J.

This action of trespass on the case for negligence was heard in the superior court on the defendant’s demurrer to an amended declaration. The demurrer was sustained and the plaintiff was given an opportunity to amend. However, she waived her right to amend and the case is before us solely on her exception to the ruling sustaining the demurrer.

The plaintiff is seeking to recover damages for the loss of the conjugal society and consortium of her husband on the ground that he became sterile and impotent as a result of an injury sustained by him while employed by defendant. The pertinent allegations in each count of the declaration in substance state that her husband, while employed by defendant, received a personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment, “namely, while carrying planks off truck with helper, and helper dropped his end, resulting” in the injury which she alleges caused his sterility and impotency.

*154
      *Luigi Capasso,*for plaintiff.

*Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury & Parsons, Guy J. Wells,*for defendant.

The superior court held that the declaration alleged that the injuries complained of resulted from the negligence of a fellow servant and was therefore demurrable. The plaintiff’s contention that the superior court erred is without merit. Under the common law a master is not liable for injuries caused by the negligence of a fellow worker. *Ryan*v. *Unsworth,*52 R. I. 86, 89.

The plaintiff’s rights in the circumstances of this case are derivative and depend upon her husband’s right to recover against defendant in an action of negligence. Under our law he has no such right and it therefore follows that she has none. The decision of the superior court sustaining the demurrer was without error.

-Since the conclusion we have reached is decisive of the plaintiff’s rights, we do not deem it necessary to consider other issues raised by her.

The plaintiff’s bill of exceptions is overruled, and the case is remitted to the superior court for further proceedings.
§ 105-72.403 Federally-owned and exempt property. ( a ) *Federally-owned property.* ( 1 ) Title to federally-owned property remains vested in the Federal Government. Recipients shall submit annually an inventory listing of federally-owned property in their custody to the Federal awarding agency. Upon completion of the award or when the property is no longer needed, the recipient shall report the property to the Federal awarding agency for further Federal agency utilization.
( 2 ) If the Federal awarding agency has no further need for the property, it shall be declared excess and reported to the General Services Administration, unless the Federal awarding agency has statutory authority to dispose of the property by alternative methods (e.g., the authority provided by the Federal Technology Transfer Act (15 U.S.C. 3710 (I)) to donate research equipment to educational and non-profit organizations in accordance with E.O. 12821, “Improving Mathematics and Science Education in Support of the National Education Goals.”) Appropriate instructions shall be issued to the recipient by the Federal awarding agency.
( b ) *Exempt property.* When statutory authority exists, the Federal awarding agency has the option to vest title to property acquired with Federal funds in the recipient without further obligation to the Federal Government and under conditions the Federal awarding agency considers appropriate. Such property is “exempt property.” Should a Federal awarding agency not establish conditions, title to exempt property upon acquisition shall vest in the recipient without further obligation to the Federal Government.
#### § 60-3.18 Citations.

The official title of these guidelines is “Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978)”. The Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978) are intended to establish a uniform Federal position in the area of prohibiting discrimination in employment practices on grounds of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. These guidelines have been adopted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Labor, the Department of Justice, and the Civil Service Commission.

The official citation is:

“Section 60-3, Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedure (1978); 43 FR 38295 (August 25, 1978).”

The short form citation is:

“Section 60-3, U.G.E.S.P. (1978); 43 FR 38295 (August 25, 1978).”

When the guidelines are cited in connection with the activities of one of the issuing agencies, a specific citation to the regulations of that agency can be added at the end of the above citation. The specific additional citations are as follows:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

29 CFR Part 1607

Department of Labor

Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs

41 CFR Part 60-3

Department of Justice

28 CFR 50.14

Civil Service Commission

5 CFR 300.103(c)

Normally when citing these guidelines, the section number immediately preceding the title of the guidelines will be from these guidelines series 1-18. If a section number from the codification for an individual agency is needed it can also be added at the end of the agency citation. For example, section 6A of these guidelines could be cited for EEOC as follows: “Section 6A, Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978); 43 FR 38295, (August 25, 1978); 29 CFR Part 1607, section 6A.”
#### § 51-5.8 Violations by entities of the Government.

Any alleged violations of the JWOD Act or these regulations by entities of the Government shall be investigated by the Committee, which shall notify the entity and afford it an opportunity to submit a statement.

[56 FR 48981, Sept. 26, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 59343, Nov. 16, 1994]
#### § 302-7.18 May PBP&E be transported at Government expense upon returning to CONUS for separation from Government service, after completion of an OCONUS assignment?

Any PBP&E that was transported as an administrative expense of the Government to the OCONUS assignment will be returned as an administrative expense of the Government to the place of actual residence or any other location, not to exceed the cost to the authorized destination.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18340, Apr. 1, 2011]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of VendingData Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Mark R. Newburg, Chief Executive Officer, and Arnaldo F. Galassi, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


By:    /s/ Mark R. Newburg                              Dated: December 21, 2005
       -------------------------------------
       Mark R. Newburg
Title: Chief Executive Officer, Principal
       Executive Officer


By:    /s/ Arnaldo F. Galassi                           Dated: December 21, 2005
       -------------------------------------
       Arnaldo F. Galassi
Title: Chief Financial Officer of VendingData
       Corporation

      This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
Searched for **http://blogs.archives.gov/online-public-access/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://blogs.archives.gov/online-public-access/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Analysts International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended July 4, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, Elmer N. Baldwin, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Randy W. Strobel, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: August 13,  2009 | By:    | /s/ Elmer N. Baldwin                   |
|------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Elmer N. Baldwin                       |
|                         |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                         |   |                                   |
| Dated: August 13,  2009 | By:    | /s/ Randy W. Strobel                   |
|                         |   | Randy W. Strobel                       |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer  and Treasurer |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Celulosa Arauco y Constitución S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 26, 2009



/s/ Matías DomeykoName:

Matías DomeykoTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


Date: June 26, 2009



/s/ Robinson TajmuchName:

Robinson TajmuchTitle:

Chief Controlling Officer