alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16487]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES

Cooperative Agreement for Continued Management of ArtsLink

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts.

ACTION: Notification of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts is requesting proposals 
leading to one (1) award of a Cooperative Agreement to a nonprofit 
organization for continued management of ArtsLink. ArtsLink is a 
public-private partnership that offers opportunities for artistic 
exchange between the United States and the countries of Eastern and 
Central Europe and the former Soviet Union. The project awards grants 
to U.S. artists and arts organizations, and supports residencies. The 
work includes managing all phases of proposal review, artists and 
residency placements, and the financial award process, including the 
management of logistical arrangements for residencies, in regard to 
participants' arrival, lodging, and transfer to host organization 
locations. The successful recipient of the Cooperative Agreement will 
be expected to contribute matching funds of at least $75,000. Those 
interested in receiving the Solicitation package should reference 
Program Solicitation PS 00-07 in their written request and include two 
(2) self-addressed labels. Verbal requests for the Solicitation will 
not be honored. It is anticipated that the Program Solicitation will 
also be posted on the Endowment's Web site at http://www.arts.gov.

DATES: Program Solicitation PS 00-07 is scheduled for release 
approximately July 17, 2000 with proposals due on August 17, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Requests for the Solicitation should be addressed to the 
National Endowment for the Arts, Grants & Contracts Office, Room 618, 
1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Hummel, Grants & Contracts 
Office, National Endowment for the Arts, Room 618, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20506 (202/682-5482).

William I. Hummel,
Coordinator, Cooperative Agreements.
[FR Doc. 00-16487 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
```
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CLINICOMP INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CERNER CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2023-1295, 23-1574

______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of California in No. 3:17-cv-02479-GPCDEB, Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 23-1295 Document: 20 Page: 1 Filed: 06/05/2023
2 CLINICOMP INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. CERNER CORPORATION 

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

June 5, 2023

Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow 

Acting Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 5, 2023

Case: 23-1295 Document: 20 Page: 2 Filed: 06/05/2023
1.72265625 Dn Diameter of Nozzle ( Ft. )2

13.78125 8* (Dn)2

1.36118889 Dd2 Diameter of Sampling Duct (Ft)2

10.12442145

4.185 Roof vent velocity (ft/sec) from Anemometer Data

42.37070378 Desired Velocity in the Duct (ft/sec)

5-1-13 Line 1
#### § 302-6.11 May my immediate family and I occupy temporary quarters at different locations?

Yes. Under various circumstances, you and your immediate family may need to occupy temporary quarters at different locations (*e.g.,* if you must report to the new official station while the immediate family delays the relocation to have family members complete the school year) (see § 302-6.16 regarding concurrent TQSE).
# Comments on: 17-2471: UNISONE STRATEGIC IP, INC. v. LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
#### § 301-10.124 When may I use a reduced group or charter fare?

You may use a reduced group or charter fare when your agency has determined, on an individual case basis before your travel begins, that use of such a fare is cost effective. Chartered aircraft are subject to the same rules as Government aircraft, and agencies in the executive branch of the Federal Government are subject to the requirements of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-126 and 41 CFR part 102-33 in making such cost effectiveness determinations.

[FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55704, Sept. 12, 2022]
---

---

Exhibit 12.6

# CERTIFICATION

I, Aviram Steinhart,
certify that:

|1. | I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to annual report on Form 20-F of Lumenis
          Ltd.; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Based
on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report does not           contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact           necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which           such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by           this
report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 20, 2009

| |  | /s/ Aviram Steinhart
Aviram SteinhartChief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### § 128-1.152 Citation.

The JPMR will be cited in accordance with the Federal Register standards applicable to the FPMR. Accordingly, when this section is referred to formally in official documents, it should be cited as “41 CFR 128-1.152.” When a section of the JPMR is referred to informally, however, it may be identified simply by “JPMR” followed by the complete paragraph reference number, e.g., “JPMR 128-1.152.”
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period September 30,
2007 (the "Report"), Joey Schwartz Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1). To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                 DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 2007


                                                 /S/ JOEY SCHWARTZ
                                                 --------------------
                                                 JOEY SCHWARTZ
                                                 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.0



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Andrea Electronics Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                                            
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ PAUL E. DONOFRIO                                                                       
|                        |  | Paul E. Donofrio Chief Executive Officer and
President                                     
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ CORISA L. GUIFFRE                                                                      
|                        |  | Corisa L. Guiffre Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary
§ 301-11.30 What is my option if the Government lodging rate exceeds my lodging reimbursement? ( a ) You may request reimbursement on an actual expense basis, not to exceed 300 percent of the maximum per diem allowance.
( b ) Approval of actual expenses is usually in advance of travel and at the discretion of your agency. (See § 301-11.302.) Also, see § 301-70.201 for when an agency can issue a blanket actual expense authorization.
[FTR Amdt. 75, 63 FR 66675, Dec. 2, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-03, 76 FR 55275, Sept. 7, 2011]
No. 11-9652.

#### Wilkes *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# ATTACHMENT 1

EPA response to Interagency Comments 2.28.2013.pdf
#### § 304-3.16 What must I submit to my agency for reimbursement when a non-Federal source pays all or part of my travel expenses to attend a meeting?

You must submit a travel claim listing all allowable travel expenses that you incurred which were not paid in kind by a non-Federal source. Do not claim travel expenses that were furnished in kind by a non-Federal source. Your reimbursement is limited to the types of expenses authorized in Chapter 301 of this title or analogous provisions of the Joint Travel Regulations or Foreign Affairs Manual. Reimbursement from your agency for expenses will not in any case exceed the amount of the expenses you incur. Such reimbursement will also adhere to established regulatory limitations except where your agency accepts payments under § 304-5.4, § 304-5.5 or § 304-5.6 of this chapter.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4194 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4194

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 20 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the part of the facility located at 4605 Estata Tutu in 
  Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, which houses operations of the United 
States Postal Service as (for the period of time during which it houses 
         such operations) the ``Earle B. Ottley Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The part of the facility located at 4605 Estata Tutu in Saint 
Thomas, Virgin Islands, which houses operations
of the United States Postal Service shall, for the period of time 
during which it houses such operations, be known and designated as the 
``Earle B. Ottley Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the part of the facility referred to in 
section 1 shall, with respect to the period referred to in section 1, 
be deemed to be a reference to the Earle B. Ottley Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 60-741.82 Labor organizations and recruiting and training agencies. ( a ) Whenever performance in accordance with the equal opportunity clause or any matter contained in the regulations in this part may necessitate a revision of a collective bargaining agreement, the labor organizations which are parties to such agreement shall be given an adequate opportunity to present their views to OFCCP.
( b ) OFCCP shall use its best efforts, directly or through contractors, subcontractors, local officials, vocational rehabilitation facilities, and all other available instrumentalities, to cause any labor organization, recruiting and training agency, or other representative of workers who are employed by a contractor to cooperate with, and to assist in, the implementation of the purposes of the act.
261P15

#### Richard O’Neal, Employee v. Inline Fluid Power, Inc. *&*Automotive Parts Co., Inc., Employer and Auto Owners Insurance Company, Carrier

1. Plt’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1144)

1. Special Order

2. Pit’s Motion to Amend PDR

2. Special Order

3. Pit’s Motion to Strike Response to Motion to Amend PDR

3. Special Order
Exhibit 21

Listing of
Subsidiaries of Capital Corp of the West

|Corporation Name                             | State of Organization or Incorporation | Doing Business As                           
|-------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|County Bank                                  | California                             | County Bank                                 
|Merced Area Investment and Development, Inc. | California                             | Merced Area Investment and Development, Inc.
|County Statutory Trust I                     | Connecticut                            | County Statutory Trust I                    
|County Statutory Trust II                    | Connecticut                            | County Statutory Trust II                   
|County Investment Trust                      | Maryland                               | County Investment Trust                     
|County Asset Advisors, Inc.                  | California                             | County Asset Advisors, Inc.                 
|Capital West Group, Inc.                     | California                             | Capital West Group, Inc.
#### § 115-1.106 Applicability of FPMR.

The FPMR apply to all EPA activities unless otherwise specified, or unless a deviation is approved.
No. 11-176.

#### Poole *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: NOBLE SYSTEMS CORPORATION,

Appellant

______________________

2018-1847

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/798,815.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

KARL HEINZ KOSTER, Noble Systems Corporation, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant.

 ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for 

appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by JOSEPH MATAL,

THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS.

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit 

Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 March 7, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

AUBREY BEASLEY,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent

______________________

2023-2352

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. CH-0752-17-0273-I-1.

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the court’s December 19, 2023 

order and Aubrey Beasley’s Federal Circuit Form 10, ECF 

No. 20, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This case and all transmittals are transferred to the 

United States District Court for the Northern District of 

Case: 23-2352 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 02/26/2024
2 BEASLEY v. DVA

Illinois pursuant to the court’s December 19, 2023 order 

and 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

February 26, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

 

Case: 23-2352 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 02/26/2024
```

[House Report 106-514]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-514

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY S. 
                           376, THE ORBIT ACT

                                _______
                                

   March 8, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 432]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 432, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of the 
Conference Report to accompany S. 376, the ORBIT Act. The rule 
waives all points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration.
    The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of 
clause 9 of Rule XXII (violating the scope of the conference) 
because the conference report includes provisions not committed 
to the conference committee by either chamber. A waiver of 
clause 7(d) of Rule XXII (concerning the sufficiency of the 
joint explanatory statement accompanying a conference report) 
is also needed because the joint explanatory statement may not 
contain sufficient detailes as required by rules of the House.

                                  

```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4242

To enforce the law regulating the height of buildings in the District of

Columbia by prohibiting the District of Columbia from issuing any building or occupancy permit for the project described in Zoning Commission

Case 93–9C unless the project is modified to conform to such law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 18, 1994

Mr. STARK (for himself and Mr. BLILEY) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the District of Columbia

A BILL

To enforce the law regulating the height of buildings in

the District of Columbia by prohibiting the District of

Columbia from issuing any building or occupancy permit

for the project described in Zoning Commission Case

93–9C unless the project is modified to conform to such

law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FROM

4 ISSUING BUILDING OR OCCUPANCY PERMIT.

5 The District of Columbia may not issue any building

6 or occupancy permit for the project described in Zoning
2

•HR 4242 IH

1 Commission Case 93–9C, as approved by the Zoning Com2 mission for the District of Columbia on April 11, 1994,

3 unless the project is modified so that—

4 (1) in the building proposed to be constructed

5 under the project, any space above a studio that is

6 used primarily to house servicing equipment for the

7 studio is not more than 110 feet above the applica8 ble measuring point; and

9 (2) any penthouse on the building proposed to

10 be constructed under the project is set back from

11 the building’s exterior or bounding walls by a dis12 tance at least equal to the penthouse’s height.

Æ
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In re: NSIXTY, LLC, 

Appellant

______________________

2022-2178

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/014,031.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

December 1, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 1, 2022

Case: 22-2178 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 12/01/2022
# Comments on: 20-1036: SPACE DATA CORPORATION v. ALPHABET INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16451]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular 25.22, Certification of Transport Airplane 
Mechanical Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of advisory circular.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) 
25.22, Certification of Transport Airplane Mechanical Systems. This AC 
sets forth an acceptable means, but not the only means, of 
demonstrating compliance with the provisions of part 25 of the Federal 
Aviation Regulations (FAR) related to the mechanical systems and 
equipment installations for transport category airplanes. Like all ACs, 
it is not regulatory but is to provide guidance for applicants in 
demonstrating compliance with the objective safety standards set forth 
in the rule.

DATES:  Advisory Circular 25.22 was issued by the Manager, Transport 
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, ANM-100, on March 
14, 2000.

HOW TO OBTAIN COPIES:  A copy may be obtained by writing to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, DOT 
Warehouse, SVC-121.23, 3341Q 75th Ave., Landover, MD 20785, telephone 
301-322-5377, or faxing your request to the warehouse at 301-386-5394. 
This AC can be found and downloaded from the Internet at http://www.faa.gov/avr/air/airhome.htm, at the link titled ``Advisory 
Circulars.''

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 7, 2000.
Donald L. Riggin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service, ANM-100.
[FR Doc. 00-16451 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Benjamin MURRELL v. STATE

CR-14-0138

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

03/06/2015

Reh. denied 03/27/2015

Affirmed
No. 11-1113.

#### Jun Du *v.*TD Bank et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.