alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


FOR GOOD VALUE on or before April 27, 2017
(the "Repayment Date"), CANNAVOICES, INC., a Florida corporation ("Cannavoices"), promises to pay to the order
of HIT SUM TO ME, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Lender"), the principal sum of SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND AND
NO/100 DOLLARS ($ 600,000.00) together with interest at the rate of fifteen percent (15%) per annum on the unpaid balance (the
“Note”).


 


Accrued interest shall be paid by Cannavoices
pro rata on the first day of each month beginning on June 1, 2016 and continuing on the first day of each month during the life
of the Note. Cannavoices shall possess and retain the right at all times during the life of the Note to prepay without penalty
any portion or all of the principal or interest on the Note at any time. All payments hereunder will be first applied to accrued
and unpaid interest, if any, then to proper charges hereunder and the balance, if any, to principal.


 


The Note shall, at the option of any holder
hereof, be due and payable upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (1) Cannavoices' failure to make any payment within
thirty (30) days of its due date hereunder, (2) Cannavoices' breach of the Loan Agreement or (3) the insolvency, bankruptcy, liquidation
of Cannavoices or the filing of any assignment for the benefit of creditors by Cannavoices which is not vacated within thirty (30)
days. If the Note shall be in default and placed for collection, Cannavoices agrees to pay all reasonable attorneys' fees and costs
of collection. Payments shall be made by Cannavoices to Lender at the address for Lender as Lender may from time-to-time designate
in writing to Cannavoices.


 


Cannavoices agrees to be bound by the Note
and the terms hereof until the Note is repaid in full and hereby waives demand, presentment and protest and all notices thereto.
Cannavoices further agrees to remain bound by the terms hereof notwithstanding any extension, modification, waiver or other indulgence,
discharge or release hereunder or exchange, substitution or release of security on the Note until the Note is paid in full. No
modification or indulgency by Lender or any holder through Lender shall be binding unless in writing signed by both parties hereto,
and any indulgence, discharge or release on any one occasion shall not be considered an indulgence, discharge or release for any
other or future occasion. The Note shall be governed and enforced pursuant to the laws of the State of Florida and Cannavoices
agrees that the sole venue for resolution of any disputes related to the Note or the collection of the same by Lender shall be
in the courts of Okaloosa County, Florida.


 


DATED this 27th day of April, 2016.


 


CANNAVOICES, INC. ("Cannavoices")


 


	BY: 	 	 
	 	Kevin Gillespie, President	 


 


AGREED BY LENDER:


 


	
         By:
	 	 


 


	Print Name:	Todd Schweizer, Manager	 
	 	Hit Sum To Me, LLC
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

** **

**MOSSIMO, INC.**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Annual Report of Mossimo, Inc. (theCompany) on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I Vicken Festekjian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)            The Report, to which this certification is attached asExhibit 32.3, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the Company.

 
| /s/ VICKEN  FESTEKJIAN     |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Vicken  Festekjian         |
| *Chief Financial  Officer* |
| April 28,  2006       |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THECOMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF UPON REQUEST.

 

THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-K TO WHICH ITRELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND ISNOT TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO A FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THESECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 (WHETHER MADE BEFORE ORAFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-K), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERALINCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (194)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,483
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,865
<PP&E>                                           6,164
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,190
<BONDS>                                          4,715
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,606
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,673)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,838
<SALES>                                          1,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,141
<CGS>                                            1,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (30)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (791)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (791)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00427

- CR

Bobby J. PORTER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR5248

Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

affirmed.

SIGNED April 17, 2019.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Johnson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                          DATE: AUGUST 10, 2007


                                          /S/ DAVID J. JOHNSON
                                          --------------------
                                          DAVID J. JOHNSON
                                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT
#### § 51-3.6 Reports to central nonprofit agencies.

Any information, other than that contained in the Annual Certification required by § 51-4.3(a) of this chapter, which a central nonprofit agency requires its nonprofit agencies to submit on an annual basis, shall be requested separately from the Annual Certification. If the information is being sought in response to a request by the Committee, nonprofit agencies shall be advised of that fact and the central nonprofit agency shall, prior to distribution, provide to the Committee a copy of each form which it plans to use to obtain such information from its nonprofit agencies.
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

**MOSSIMO, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Mossimo, Inc. (theCompany) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I Vicken Festekjian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of myknowledge:

(1)         The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.3,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the Company.
| /s/ VICKEN FESTEKJIAN      |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|
| Vicken  Festekjian         |   |
| *Chief Financial  Officer* |   |
| April 27, 2005             |   |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINALOF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THECOMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF UPONREQUEST.

THIS CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-K TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILEDWITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE INTO A FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THESECURITIES ACT OF 1934 (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-K),IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING.

----
No. 11-5140.

#### Suggs *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10061 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RICHARD DEON MURRELL , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 471

- 5

Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Richard Deon Murrell has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Murrell h as not filed a response. We have reviewed cou nsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 9, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10061 Document: 00514546622 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2018No. 17

- 10061

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is ex cused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-10061 Document: 00514546622 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2018
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4344

To prohibit ticket resale profiteering in or affecting interstate commerce.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1994

Mr. LEVY (for himself, Mr. KING, and Mr. BRYANT) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit ticket resale profiteering in or affecting interstate

commerce.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interstate Ticket Re5 sale Prohibition Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF TICKET RESALE PROFITEERING.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 89 of title 18, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

9 following:
2

•HR 4344 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1822. Ticket profiteering

2 ‘‘(a) Whoever knowingly, and for the profit of any

3 individual or entity other than a non-profit entity, engages

4 in the resale of a ticket, in or affecting interstate or for5 eign commerce, at a price that exceeds the broker’s price,

6 shall be fined under this title.

7 ‘‘(b) As used in this section—

8 ‘‘(1) the term ‘ticket’ means any evidence of the

9 right or entry to any place of entertainment;

10 ‘‘(2) the term ‘place of entertainment’ means a

11 place where there is any form of entertainment, di12 version, recreation, or show, and to which there is an

13 admission charge;

14 ‘‘(3) the term ‘broker’s price’ means a price $5

15 greater than—

16 ‘‘(A) the price printed or otherwise indi17 cated on the ticket; or

18 ‘‘(B) in the absence of that, the price set

19 by the operator of the place of entertainment

20 for the admission to that place evidenced by

21 such ticket; and

22 ‘‘(4) the term ‘resale’ means any sale of a ticket

23 other than by the operator (or operator’s agent) of

24 the place of entertainment to which the ticket

25 pertains.’’.
3

•HR 4344 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

2 at the beginning of chapter 89 of title 18, United States

3 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

4 item:

‘‘1822. Ticket profiteering.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-80201-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM MANUEL SANCHEZ-REYES,

Defendant.

/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation entered by 

Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart following Change of Plea Hearing [ECF No. 51]. On May

12, 2023, Magistrate Judge Reinhart held a Change of Plea hearing [ECF No. 47] during which 

Defendant pled guilty to Counts 1 and 5 of the Indictment [ECF No. 10] pursuant to a written plea 

agreement and factual proffer [ECF No. 48]. Magistrate Judge Reinhart thereafter issued a Report 

recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to Counts 1 and 5 of the Indictment, 

that the Court find Defendant to have freely and voluntarily entered his guilty plea, and that the 

Court adjudicate him guilty of those offenses [ECF No. 10]. Neither party has filed objections to 

the Report, and the time to do so has expired. 

The Court has conducted a review of the record and finds no error in the Report. Therefore, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 51] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. The guilty plea entered into by Defendant William Manuel Sanchez-Reyes as to 

Counts 1 and 5 of the Indictment is ACCEPTED. 

Case 9:22-cr-80201-AMC Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-80201-CR-CANNON

2

3. Defendant William Manuel Sanchez-Reyes is adjudicated guilty of Counts 1 and 5 of 

the Indictment. Count 1 charges him with conspiracy to distribute and conspiracy to 

possess with the intent to distribute five (5) kilograms or more of a mixture and 

substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Count 5 charges Defendant with distribution of five hundred 

(500) grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of 

cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(ii)(II) [ECF No. 10]. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 15th day of June 2023.

________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cr-80201-AMC Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2023 Page 2 of 2
(1997) 

IV. COMMITTEE ACTIONS AND FILINGS OF 

THE PARTIES LEADING UP TO THE SEPTEMBER EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS 

b. Ongoing Discovery 
1998 
1999 
2000 
2001 
2002 
2003 
2004 
2005 
2006 
2007 
2008 
2009 
2010 
2011 
2012 
2013 
2014 
2015 
2016 
2017 
2018 
2019 
2020 
2021 
2022 
2023 
2024 
2025 
2026 
2027 
2028 
2029 
2030 
2031 
2032 
2033 
2034 
2035 
2036 
2037 
2038 
2039 
2040 
2041 
2042 
2043 
2044 
2045 
2046 
2047 
2048 
2049 
2050 
2051 
2052 
2053 
2054 
2055 
2056 
2057 
2058 
2059 
2060 
2061 
2062 
2063 
2064 
2065 
2066 
2067 
2068 
2069 
2070 
2071 
2072 
2073 
2074 
2075 
2076 
2077 
2078 
2079 
2080 
2081 
2082 
2083 
2084 
2085 
2086 
2087 
2088 
2089 
2090 
2091 
2092 
2093 
2094 
2095 
2096 
2097 
2098 
2099 
2100 
2101 
2102 
2103 
2104 
2105 
2106 
2107 
2108 
2109 
2110 
2111 
2112 
2113 
2114 
2115 
2116 
2117 
2118 
2119 
2120 
2121 
2122 
2123 
2124 
2125 
2126 
2127 
2128 
2129 
2130 
2131 
2132 
2133 
2134 
2135 
2136 
2137 
2138 
2139 
2140 
2141 
2142 
2143 
2144 
2145 
2146 
2147 
2148 
2149 
2150 
2151 
2152 
2153 
2154 
2155 
2156 
2157 
2158 
2159 
2160 
2161
#### § 102-75.200 What amount must the transferee agency pay if property is being transferred for the purpose of upgrading the transferee agency's facilities?

Where the transfer is for the purpose of upgrading facilities (i.e., for the purpose of replacing other property of the transferee agency, which because of the location, nature, or condition thereof, is less efficient for use), the transferee must pay an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the property to be replaced and the fair market value of the property requested, as determined by the Administrator.
#### § 11.44 Alert repetition.

An alert originator may “repeat” an alert by releasing the alert anew—*i.e.,* re-originating the alert—at least one minute subsequent to the time the message was initially released by the originator, as reflected in the repeat alert's JJJHHMM header code. Because alerts take time to activate across the EAS alert distribution chain, alert originators should consider an interval between the original and re-originated alert that is long enough to account for this process. If the re-originated alert is intended to reflect a valid time period consistent with the original, the valid time period code (the +TTTT header code identified in § 11.31(c)) set for the re-originated alert should be adjusted to account for the elapsed time between the original and re-originated alerts. Alert originators should be aware that repeating alerts routinely may cause alert fatigue among the public.

[86 FR 46791, Aug. 20, 2021]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439

PETER R. MARKSTEINER

CLERK OF COURT

CLERK’S OFFICE

202-275-8000

April 1, 2020

Availability of Live Audio Access to April 2020 Court Session

Following declarations of public health emergencies in the National Capital Region, 

the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit limited public access to the 

courthouse and directed that all remaining arguments on the April 2020 calendar 

be conducted telephonically. Given these extraordinary circumstances, the court 

has authorized live audio access to all arguments during the April 2020 session. 

By 9 a.m. (EDT) the morning of each day of argument, the Clerk’s Office will post on 

its website dial-in numbers that members of the media and the public can use to 

access the live audio of each panel scheduled for argument that day. Members of 

the media and the public can begin connecting to an individual conference line 

starting at 9:15 a.m. each day of argument, and attendees should plan to connect to 

the conference line no later than 9:45 a.m. 

These conference lines will be available in “listen only” mode, with a separate line 

used to access each panel. Recordings of all arguments will be posted on the court’s 

website after the conclusion of arguments each day.

Because of limited on-site staff availability, the Clerk’s Office will neither be able to 

provide technical assistance to anyone trying to access the conference lines nor be 

able to provide access information either ahead of time or beyond what is posted on 

the court’s website. 

Please direct any media inquiries to chiefdeputyclerk@cafc.uscourts.gov.
No. 11-1120.

#### Medevac Medical Response, Inc., et al. *v.*Kipper et al.

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.
Case 0:22-cv-61655-JEM   Document 16   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2022   Page 1 of 1