alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-8928.

#### Davis *v.*Holmes, Administrator, South Woods State Prison.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
FY 2008 Report of Withdrawals in Accordance with ISOO’s “Interim Guidelines Governing Rereview of Previously Declassified Records at the National Archives” (April 2006) 

The interim guidelines, available online at http://www.archives.gov/isoo/reports/2006-audit-report-attach2.pdf, are pending formal promulgation, to include public comment, as a change to 32 C.F.R. Part 

2001.13. 

Please refer to the “Audit of the Withdrawal of Records from Public Access at the National Archives and 

Records Administration for Classification Purposes, April 26, 2006,” (http://www.archives.gov/isoo/ 

reports/2006-audit-report.html) concerning records formally withdrawn prior to April 26, 2006. 

First Quarter FY 2008, October – December 2007 

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal 

NARA Location Where 

Withdrawal Took Place 

Date 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn 

None withdrawn 

Second Quarter FY 2008, January – March 2008 

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal 

NARA Location Where 

Withdrawal Took Place 

Date 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn 

None withdrawn 

Third Quarter FY 2008, April – June 2008 

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal 

NARA Location Where 

Withdrawal Took Place 

Date 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn 

None withdrawn 

Fourth Quarter FY 2008, July – September 2008 

Agency Responsible for 

Withdrawal 

NARA Location Where 

Withdrawal Took Place 

Date 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Records 

Withdrawn 

Number of 

Textual Pages 

Withdrawn 

None withdrawn 

For more information about this report, contact NARA’s Public Affairs Office at (202) 357-5100.
#### § 60-30.22 Official transcript.

The official transcripts of testimony taken, together with any exhibits, briefs, or memorandums of law, shall be filed with the Administrative Law Judge. Transcripts of testimony may be obtained from the official reporter by the parties and the public as provided in section 11(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (86 Stat. 770). Upon notice to all parties, the Administrative Law Judge may authorize such corrections to the transcript as are necessary to reflect accurately the testimony.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1153

In re: VIVEK SHAH , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. (5:15

- cv
- 07542)

Submitted : April 19, 2018 Decided: April 24, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed in part, denied in part by un published per curiam opinion

.
Vivek Shah, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Vivek Shah petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed ruling on his motion to r econsider the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion . He seeks an order from this court directing the district court t o act. The
district court docket reflects that the district court issued an order on February 8, 2018, denying Shah’s motion to reconsider, thus mooting this aspect of the petition

. To the extent that Shah challenges the dis trict court’s disposition of t he § 2255 motion, a mandamus petition is not a proper substitute for a direct appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007)

. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis , deny as moot Shah’s motion to expedite , and di smiss in part and deny in part the petition for a writ of mandamus

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART, DENIED IN PART
§ 60-2.15 Comparing incumbency to availability. ( a ) The contractor must compare the percentage of minorities and women in each job group determined pursuant to § 60-2.13 with the availability for those job groups determined pursuant to § 60-2.14.
( b ) When the percentage of minorities or women employed in a particular job group is less than would reasonably be expected given their availability percentage in that particular job group, the contractor must establish a placement goal in accordance with § 60-2.16.
#### § 105-60.1004 Production or disclosure prohibited unless approved by the Appropriate Authority.

No current or former GSA employee shall, in response to a demand, produce any material or disclose, through testimony or other means, any information covered by this subpart, without prior approval of the Appropriate Authority.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1511 Contents of application. ( a ) An application for an award of fees and expenses under EAJA shall dentify the applicant and the proceeding for which an award is sought. Unless the applicant is an individual, the application shall state the number of employees of the applicant and describe briefly the type and purpose of its organization or business. The application shall also: ( 1 ) Show that the applicant has prevailed and identify the position of an agency or agencies in the proceeding that the applicant alleges was not substantially justified; or
( 2 ) Show that the demand by the agency or agencies in the proceeding was substantially in excess of, and was unreasonable when compared with, the decision in the proceeding.
( b ) The application shall also include a declaration that the applicant is a small entity as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601 or a statement that the applicant's net worth does not exceed $2 million (if an individual) or $7 million (for all other applicants, including their affiliates). However, an applicant may omit the statement concerning its net worth if: ( 1 ) It attaches a copy of a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service that it qualifies as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) or, in the case of a tax-exempt organization not required to obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service on its exempt status, a statement that describes the basis for the applicant's belief that it qualifies under such section; or
( 2 ) It states that it is a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)).
( c ) The application shall state the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought.
( d ) The application may also include any other matters that the applicant wishes the Commission to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( e ) The application shall be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney of the applicant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the application is true and correct.
[47 FR 3786, Jan. 27, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 11653, Apr. 10, 1987; 61 FR 39899, July 31, 1996]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131520 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131520 COA: 268829 Cass CC: 02-010390-FH ARTHUR ALLEN FENWICK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the May 24, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
No. 11-78.

#### Real Estate Innovations, Inc. *v.*Houston Association of Realtors, Inc., et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 952.27 Motion for reconsideration.

A party may file a motion for reconsideration of a final agency decision within 10 days after receiving it or within such longer period as the Judicial Officer may order. Each motion for reconsideration shall be accompanied by a brief clearly setting forth the points of fact and of law relied upon in support of said motion.
#### § 60-999.2 Display.

| 41 CFR Part where the information collection requirement is located | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| Part 60-1 | 1215-0072, 1215-0131, 1215-0163. |
| Part 60-2 | 1215-0072. |
| Part 60-3 | 3046-0017. |
| Part 60-4 | 1215-0163. |
| Part 60-20 | 1215-0072, 1215-0163. |
| Part 60-30 | 1215-0072, 1215-0163. |
| Part 60-40 | 1215-0072, 1215-0163. |
| Part 60-50 | 1215-0072, 1215-0163. |
| Part 60-250 | 1215-0072, 1215-0131, 1215-0163. |
| Part 60-741 | 1215-0072, 1215-0131, 1215-0163. |

[62 FR 66971, Dec. 22, 1997]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-810 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INVESTMENT 

 Protocol to the Treaty of April 19, 1994 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ESTONIA 

Signed at Brussels October 24, 2003 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 ESTONIA 

 Investment 

Protocol to the treaty of April 19, 1994. 

Signed at Brussels October 24, 2003; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate March 12, 2004 (Treaty Doc. 108-17, 

 108th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 April 29, 2004 (Senate Executive Report No. 108-13, 

 108th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 May 6, 2004; 

Ratified by the President June 3, 2004; 

Exchange of instruments of ratification at Washington 

 August 10, 2004; 

Entered into force August 10, 2004.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 603 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 603

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 1999

  Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the application of 
   the Act popularly known as the ``Death on the High Seas Act'' to 
                          aviation incidents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION AMENDMENT.

    Section 40120(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``(including the Act entitled `An Act relating to the 
maintenance of actions for death on the high seas and other navigable 
waters', approved March 30, 1920, commonly known as the Death on the 
High Seas Act (46 U.S.C. App. 761-767; 41 Stat. 537-538))'' after 
``United States''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies to civil actions commenced 
after the date of the enactment of this Act and to civil actions that 
are not adjudicated by a court of original jurisdiction or settled on 
or before such date of enactment.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 3, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,762,452 
<SECURITIES>                                   193,324
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,632,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,183
<INVENTORY>                                  4,671,266
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,330,858
<PP&E>                                       1,589,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                 968,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,952,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          240,135
<BONDS>                                      1,737,978
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,883,599
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,055,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,952,767
<SALES>                                      5,489,504
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,489,504
<CGS>                                        3,767,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,767,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,598,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             305,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,181,694)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,181,694)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,181,694)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.29)

        

        

        

</TABLE>
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–605

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII

WITH RESPECT TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF

CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE

MAY 3, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 488]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 488, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives the provisions of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

(requiring a two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it

is reported from the Rules Committee) against resolutions reported

from the Rules Committee on or before May 4, 2000, that provide

for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 434) to authorize a new trade and investment policy

for sub-Sahara Africa, or any amendment reported in disagreement

from a conference thereon.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       
<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>   DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>   SEP-30-1995
<CASH>    $2,254,951
<SECURITIES>   89,125
<RECEIVABLES>  1,230,019
<ALLOWANCES>   2,183
<INVENTORY>    567,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>    4,257,442
<PP&E>    627,370
<DEPRECIATION> 812,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 4,885,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>    383,164
<BONDS>   0
<COMMON>  1,605,055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>    0
<PREFERRED>    0
<OTHER-SE>     2,897,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  4,885,963
<SALES>   4,064,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>    4,064,042
<CGS>     2,217,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>  2,217,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>  2,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>     (634,784)
<INCOME-TAX>   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 0
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>     0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME>   (634,784)
<EPS-PRIMARY>  (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>  (.16)

        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32 

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of Andersen Group, Inc. for the period ended August 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Oliver R. Grace, Jr., President and ChiefExecutive Officer, and Andrew M. O'Shea, Chief Financial Officer, each herebycertifies, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)                The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  

(2)                The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Andersen Group, Inc. 
|                  | /s/ Oliver R.  Grace, Jr.             |
|------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                  | Oliver R. Grace, Jr.                  |
|                  | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                  |                                       |
| October 15, 2003 | /s/ Andrew M.  O'Shea                 |
|                  | Andrew M. O'Shea                      |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer               |

 This certification accompanies theReport pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled for purposes of § 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, asamended or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification shall not be deemedto be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the registrant specificallyincorporates this Exhibit by reference in any such filing

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
cbt-ex103_296.htm



Exhibit 10.3 

Cabot Corporation 

Summary of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 

The cash compensation payable to Cabot’s non-employee directors consists of separate annual cash retainers for serving on the Board and on each Committee on which a director serves, and an annual cash retainer for serving as non-Executive Chairman of the Board or as a Committee chair. Effective January 1, 2013, the annual cash compensation payable to Cabot’s non-employees directors consists of the following payments: 


	
 
	
•
	
An annual retainer of $75,000 for service on the Board of Directors 





	
 
	
•
	
An annual retainer of $16,000 for service on the Audit Committee 





	
 
	
•
	
An annual retainer of $7,000 for service on each of the Compensation, Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs, or Governance and Nominating Committees 





	
 
	
•
	
An annual retainer of $110,000 for service as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors 





	
 
	
•
	
An annual retainer of $25,000 for service as Chair of the Audit Committee 





	
 
	
•
	
An annual retainer of $10,000 for service as Chair of the Compensation, Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs, or Governance and Nominating Committees 




In addition, under Cabot’s 2015 Directors’ Stock Compensation Plan (the “Directors’ Stock Plan”), each non-employee director receives shares of Cabot common stock as a portion of his or her compensation for services performed in the calendar year. The dollar value of the award, or the number of shares awarded, is set each year by the Governance and Nominating Committee and, for calendar years beginning with calendar year 2017, the dollar value of the awards set by the Governance and Nominating Committee is $110,000. A pro rata grant is provided to any director who joins the Board during the calendar year.
§ 302-2.13 What is a service agreement? ( a ) A service agreement is a written and signed agreement between you and your agency. The service agreement states that you will remain in the service of the Government, after you have relocated, for a period of time as specified in § 302-2.14. A service agreement must also include the duplicate reimbursement disclosure statement specified in §§ 302-2.21, 302-2.22, and 302-2.100(g).
( b ) A service agreement is not required for a “last move home” relocation, a temporary change of station, or separation from Government service.
[86 FR 73680, Dec. 28, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4192 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4192

  To designate the United States post office located at 100 Veterans 
 Drive in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ``Arturo R. Watlington, 
                    Sr. United States Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 1994

 Mr. de Lugo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States post office located at 100 Veterans 
 Drive in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ``Arturo R. Watlington, 
                    Sr. United States Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States post office located at 100 Veterans Drive in 
Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated as the 
``Arturo R. Watlington, Sr. United States Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the post office referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Arturo R. Watlington, Sr. 
United States Post Office''.

                                 <all>
```