alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com]

Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 3:40 PM

To: Andrew Delaski; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Smith; Brian Coffey; Caitlin Johnson;

Carlos Siqueiros; Caskey, John; Chad Kennedy; Chris Bolduc; Chris Brown; Creevy,

Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eduardo Robles; Edwards, Brenda; Eric Peterson;

Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Rosenquist; Jennifer Tiedem an; Jerry

Schoen; Ji m Raba; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; Katie Coughlin; Matthew Nardotti;

Maxine Savitz; Meg Waltner; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Polinski,

Raymond; Richard W. Parker; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin

Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Ted Johnstone; Thomas

Patzner; Thomas Petrosino; Tim Ballo; Vi jay Ten dulkar; Wes Patterson

Subject: LV Transformer Rulemaking: Update; Sub

‐ Group on Data Centers

Dear Colleagues,

Hope you are well. Just a quick update before we all leave for Thanksgiving on

status of preparations for our talks next week:

1. I understand that the plan is to provide yo u w ith an updated packet of

engineering analysis and LCC/NIA results, using 2011 materials prices. Shouldn't

be many surprises there, but our consultants wanted you to have the latest.

2. Please send along any data or analysis you have on where (at what KvA

threshold) the line should be drawn fo r differe ntial treatment in Design Line 7.

On our last call there was a strong sense that 15 and

30 KvA should treated separately, but some uncertainty about whether special

treatment is required for 45

‐ 112.5 KvA units.

3. I spoke with Vijay Tendulkar and Irene Kennedy at Onyx about th e s tatus of

their work on crafting a data center sub

‐ class. They will be forwarding to the

data center subgroup (Tom Patzner, Gary Fernstrom, Tim Ballo, Andrew DeLaski,

John Caskey, Brian Coffey) a discussion draft on that early next week with the

hope that we can have a rough draft of a specif ica tion and standard for data

centers for discussion in our plenary meeting.

Have a Happy Thanksgiving. See you next week.

All best,

Richard Parker

Facilitator
No. 11-9349.

#### Goodloe *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Notice is hereby given that on January 6, 2000, the United States lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Didion Milling Company, Inc.*, Case No. 99-C-261-C (W.D. Wis.), under Section 113(b) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(b). The proposed Consent Decree resolves certain claims of the United States against Didion Milling, Inc., relating to its grain transfer facility that was located at St. Feriole Island in Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin. Under the proposed Consent Decree Didion will pay the United States a $107,500 civil penalty.                

                    The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the proposed Consent Decree for 30 days following publication of this Notice. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044-7611, and should refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Didion Milling Company, Inc.*, Case No. 99-C-261-C (W.D. Wis.), 90-5-2-1-2219/1. The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, 660 W. Washington Ave., Suite 200, Madison, Wisconsin and the Region V Office of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by overnight mail addressed to the Department of Justice Consent Decree Library, 13th Floor, 1425 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20005, or by regular mail addressed to the Department of Justice Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check for reproduction costs (at 25 cents per page) in the amount of $3.75 for the Decree, payable to the Consent Decree Library.                

Joel M. Gross,

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 00-1613 Filed 1-21-00 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 07-6010 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN TIMOTHY UNDERWOOD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (7:05-cr-00025-SGW-1; 7:06-cv-00706-SGW)

Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 5, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Timothy Underwood, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Timothy Underwood seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Underwood has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Underwood’s

motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"20-1504: MORTGAGE APPLICATION TECH. v. MERIDIANLINK, INC. [OPINION], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XKsehOuvrR\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/1-12-2021-20-1504-mortgage-application-tech-v-meridianlink-inc-opinion-20-1504-opinion-1-12-2021_1716025\/\">20-1504: MORTGAGE APPLICATION TECH. v. MERIDIANLINK, INC. [OPINION], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/1-12-2021-20-1504-mortgage-application-tech-v-meridianlink-inc-opinion-20-1504-opinion-1-12-2021_1716025\/embed\/#?secret=XKsehOuvrR\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“20-1504: MORTGAGE APPLICATION TECH. v. MERIDIANLINK, INC. [OPINION], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"XKsehOuvrR\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Opinions\/Orders posted: MORTGAGE APPLICATION TECH. v. MERIDIANLINK, INC. [OPINION](pdf) Appeal Number: 20-1504 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SILVERSTAR HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES**

**AS OF JUNE 30, 2008**

 

| Name                                     | State of Incorporation | Conducts Business Under |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------|
| Empire Interactive, PLC                  | United Kingdom         | Same                    |
| Empire Interactive Europe Limited        | United Kingdom         | Same                    |
| Empire Interactive Inc.                  | United Kingdom         | Same                    |
| Empire Interactive Holdings Limited      | United Kingdom         | Same                    |
| First South African Holdings (Pty), Ltd. | South Africa           | Same                    |
| First South Africa Management Corp.      | Delaware               | Silverstar Holdings     |
| Fantasy Sports, Inc.(Dormant)            | Delaware               | Same                    |
| Silverstar Holdings, Inc.                | Delaware               | Silverstar Holdings     |
| Strategy First, Inc.                     | Quebec, Canada         | Same                    |
| Silverstar Holdings, Ltd.                | Bermuda                | Same                    |
| Silverstar Acquisitions, PLC             | United Kingdom         | Same                    |
| Razorworks Limited (Dormant)             | United Kingdom         | Same                    |
| Xplosiv Limited (Dormant)                | United Kingdom         | Same                    |
342

343

344

345

346

347

348

349

350

351

352

353

354

355

356

357

358

359

360

361

362

363

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:22:02-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned, the Vice President, Treasurer and Chief FinancialOfficer of American Science & Engineering, Inc. (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1.               theCompany’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005(“10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                theinformation contained in the Company’s 10-Q being filed fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 

 
| Date: August 9, 2005 | /s/Kenneth J. Galaznik                                     |   |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Kenneth J. Galaznik  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to American Science & Engineering, Inc. andwill be retained by American Science & Engineering, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### § 102-75.720 Is there a specific or preferred format for the transfer request and who should receive it?

Any request submitted by a Federal agency must be in the form of a letter addressed to the appropriate GSA Public Buildings Service (PBS) regional property disposal office.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ LYMAN F. BUSH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BEVERLY J. BUSH, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________ 2009-5008

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in consolidated ca se nos. 02-CV-1041 and 04-CV1598, Judge George W. Miller.

__________________________

TOMMY J. SHELTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________ 2009-5009

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in consolidated ca se nos. 02-CV-1042 and 04-CV1595, Judge George W. Miller.

__________________________B USH v. US , 2009-5008 SHELTON v. US , 2009-5009 2

O R D E R Oral argument for these appeals is scheduled for May 10, 2011, at 11:00 a.m. in cour troom 201, before the court en banc . These appeals will be argued together allowing 30 minutes per side for a total argument time of 1 hour. The parties shall notify the clerk in writing of the name of the counsel who will present or al argument no later than April 25, 2011.

F OR T HE C OURT

April 13, 2011 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Sallie W. Gladney, Esq. Thomas E. Redding, Esq. Andrew M. Weiner, Esq.
# RECEIVED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

### JUN 25 2015 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

## HEARING DOCKET OFFICE OFHEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
Inthe Matter of: FAADocket No.: FAA-2015-1318 FOUR STARCHEMICAL CO., FAA Region: Western-Pacific Respondent. Judge: Richard C. Goodwin FAA Case No.: 2014NM730053

MOTION FORWITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT To: The Honorable Administrative Law Judge Goodwin and Respondent herein: COMES NOW, the Regional Counsel for the Western-Pacific Region, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) through counsel, hereby files this Motion for Withdrawal of Complaint and seeks dismissal ofthis action with prejudice. This motion is based on the fact the parties have settled this matter, and an Order Assessing Civil Penalty reflecting said settlement and waiver ofcivil penalty will be issued. Respectfully submitted, NAOMI TSUDA Regional Counsel By: 

## CO**~y** Adolph 

### -== General AttorneyCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that onthis date I have sent an original by regular U.S. mail Motion for Withdrawal, addressed as follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn.: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC 430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Andby facsimile and regular U.S. mail to:

Andby facsimile to:

Dated: June 18,2015The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave., S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Tel.: (202) 366-5121 Fax: (202) 366-7536
Tiffany Hedgpeth, Esq. Edgcomb Law Group, LLP 333 N. Glenoaks, Suite 610 Burbank, CA 91502 Tel.: (818) 861-7618 Fax: (818) 861-7616 

# /

../

...**+:7r~=-----Pft 1(-1£,~**  Antonia Garcia Paralegal Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal AviationAdministration Western-Pacific Region Hawthorne, California

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MYRON GIBBS

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 193, 2018

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 0 911008893 (N)

§

§

§

Submitted: April 26, 2018

Decided: June 8 , 2018

Before VALIHURA

, VAUGHN

, and SEITZ , Justices.

O R D E R

This 8 th day of June 2018

, after careful consideration of the appellant’s

opening brief, the appellee’s motion to affirm, 1 and the record below, we conclude

that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s

order adopting the Commissioner’s well

- reasoned re po rt and recommendation dated

February 28, 2018

. 2 The Superior Court did not err in concluding that the appellant’s

third motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and did not satisfy the

pleading requirements of Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(d)(2)

.

1 On May 17, 2018

, the appellant filed a motion for leave to respond to the motion to affirm. Under

Supreme Court Rule 25(a), a response to a motion to affirm is not permitted unless requested by

the Court. The Court did not request a response to the motion to affirm and fi nds no reason to

request a response after considering the appellant's motion.

2 State v. Gibbs , 2018 WL 1110429 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 28, 2018).2

NOW, T HEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED

and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
#### § 60-300.70 Disputed matters related to compliance with the Act.

The procedures set forth in the regulations in this part govern all disputes relative to the contractor's compliance with the Act and this part. Any disputes relating to issues other than compliance, including contract costs arising out of the contractor's efforts to comply, shall be determined by the disputes clause of the contract.
No. 11-239.

#### Samuels *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 21


                         ESC MEDICAL SYSTEMS LTD.

                          List of Subsidiaries



 Applied Optronics Corp.
 111Corporate Boulevard,
 Bldg. J
 South Plainfield, NJ 07080
 USA

 Energy Systems Holdings Inc.
 16885 W. Bernardo Drive
 San Diego, CA, 92127
 USA

 ESC Japan K.K.
 2nd Floor, No. 31 Kowa Building
 19-1, Shirokanedai 3-Chome
 Minato-ku, Tokyo
 Japan

 ESC Medical Systems Inc.
 100 Morse Street
 Norwood, MA 02062
 USA

 ESC Medical Systems (Italy) Srl
 Via Degli Olmetti 36
 00060 Formello, Roma
 Italy

 ESC Medizintechnik Vertriebs GmbH
 Leonhardsweg 2
 D-82008 Unterhaching b. Munchen, Germany

 ESC / Sharplan  France SARL
 6 Bd. Henri Sellier
 Bat. Le Ventose
 92150 Suresne
 France

 Laser Industries, Ltd.
 Atidim Science Based Industrial Park
 Neve Sharet  P.O. Box 13135
 Tel Aviv 61131, Israel

 Luxar Corporation
 22011 30th Ave., SE Building B
 Bothell, WA 98021
 USA

 Opus Dent GmbH
 AM Lohmuhbach 12A
 85356 Freising/Lerchenfeld
 Germany

 OpusDent Limited
 Atidim Science Based Industrial Park
 Neve Sharet  P.O. Box 13135
 Tel Aviv 61131, Israel

 Sharplan Lasers, Inc.
 5 Pearl Court
 Allendale, New Jersey 07401
 USA

 Sharplan Lasers UK Limited
 Merit House, 1st Flr.
 Edgware Rd.
 Colindale, London
 NW9 5AF
 England

 SPECTRON Laser GmbH
 Echersheimer Land STR 526
 60433 Frankfurt/Main
 Germany

 Spectron Laser Systems Ltd.
 8 Consul Rd,
 Rugby, Warwickshire
 CV21 1PB, England

 Spectron Lasers USA, Inc.
 33 Plan Way
 Warwick, Rhode Island 02886
 USA

 Wuhan Sharplan Chutian Medical Laser Manufacturing Ltd.
 No.7-3,Guanshan San Rd
 Wuhan, P.R. China 430074
EXHIBIT 32.0

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Andrea Electronics Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                                                                    
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ DOULGAS J. ANDREA                                                                              
|                      |  | Douglas J. Andrea Chairman of the Board,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Secretary
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ CORISA L. GUIFFRE                                                                              
|                      |  | Corisa L. Guiffre Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# ACTION:

Appointment of individuals to serve as members of Performance Review Board.

# EFFECTIVE:

June 17, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Micheal J. Hillier, Director of Personnel, U.S. International Trade Commission, (202) 205-2651. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Chairman of the U.S. International Trade Commission has appointed the following individuals to serve on the Commission's Performance Review Board (PRB).

Chairman of PRB—Vice-Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun 

Member—Commissioner Lynn M. Bragg 

Member—Commissioner Marcia E. Miller 

Member—Commissioner Jennifer A. Hillman 

Member—Commissioner Thelma J. Askey 

Member—Robert A. Rogowsky 

Member—Lyn M. Schlitt 

Member—Stephen A. McLaughlin 

Member—Eugene A. Rosengarden 

Member—Lynn Featherstone 

Member—Vern Simpson 

Member—Lynn I. Levine 

Member—Robert B. Koopman

                    Notice of these appointments is being published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to the requirement of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).                 

Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting our TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. 

Issued: June 20, 2000.

By order of the Chairman. 

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16098 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P