alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61658-CV-WILLIAMS

AZ55S, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLINSCO.COM, LLC,

Defendant.

/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle’s Report

and Recommendation on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint or for a 

More Definite Statement (DE 64) (“Report”). In the Report, Judge Valle recommends that

the Court deny Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint or for a More Definite 

Statement (DE 28) (“Motion”). (DE 64 at 1.) Neither Party filed objections to the Report 

and the time to do so has passed.

Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable law, the 

Court agrees with Judge Valle’s well-reasoned analysis and conclusion that Defendant’s

Motion be denied. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report (DE 64) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. Defendant’s Motion (DE 28) is DENIED.

3. Defendant shall file its answer to the Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) 

days of the date of this Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12.

Case 0:22-cv-61658-KMW Document 69 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 17th day of July, 2023.

Case 0:22-cv-61658-KMW Document 69 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2023 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          29,542
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                       575
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,805
<PP&E>                                          39,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,714
<BONDS>                                         27,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,479
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,733
<SALES>                                        465,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               465,578
<CGS>                                          365,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  365,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   535
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,686
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,894
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,792
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,792
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           UT
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
         EXTRACTED FROM NEW CENTURY ENERGIES, INC. BALANCE SHEET
         AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
         BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.                         
 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                             PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     0
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      200
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              200
<COMMON>                                    200
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          0
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                            0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                     0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                 0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                     0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                0
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               200
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     0
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                          0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    0
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       0
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                     0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0

        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4287 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4287

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for assignment of 
  employees of federally funded research and development centers and 
    Federal employees between Federal agencies and federally funded 
                   research and development centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 1994

Mr. Schiff (for himself and Mrs. Lloyd) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for assignment of 
  employees of federally funded research and development centers and 
    Federal employees between Federal agencies and federally funded 
                   research and development centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASSIGNMENTS OF EMPLOYEES BETWEEN FEDERAL AGENCIES AND 
              FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS.

    (a) Authority.--Section 3371(4) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking out ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (B);
            (2) by striking out the period at the end of subparagraph 
        (C) and inserting in lieu thereof ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) a federally funded research and development 
                center.''.
    (b) Provisions Governing Assignments.--Section 3372 of title 5, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(e) Under regulations prescribed pursuant to section 3376 of this 
title--
            ``(1) an assignment of an employee of a Federal agency to 
        an other organization, and an employee so assigned, shall be 
        treated in the same way as an assignment of an employee of a 
        Federal agency to a State or local government, and an employee 
        so assigned, is treated under the provisions of this subchapter 
        governing an assignment of an employee of a Federal agency to a 
        State or local government; and
            ``(2) an assignment of an employee of an other organization 
        to a Federal agency, and an employee so assigned, shall be 
        treated in the same way as an assignment of an employee of a 
        State or local government to a Federal agency, and an employee 
        so assigned, is treated under the provisions of this subchapter 
        governing an assignment of an employee of a State or local 
        government to a Federal agency.''.

                                 <all>
```
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date:  August 10, 2010 |   | /s/ DOUGLAS J. ANDREA                                                                            |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                             |   | Douglas J. AndreaChairman of the Board,President, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Corporate Secretary |
|   |                             |   |                                                                                             |
|   |                             |   | /s/ CORISA L. GUIFFRE                                                                            |
|   |                             |   | Corisa L. GuiffreVice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Assistant CorporateSecretary         |
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1109 Schedule of charges for applications and other filings for the Homeland services.

Payments should be made electronically using the Commission's electronic filing and payment system in accordance with the procedures set forth on the Commission's website, *www.fcc.gov/licensing-databases/fees.* Manual filings and/or payments for these services are no longer accepted.

| Service | FCC Form No. | Fee amount | Payment type code |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. Communication Assistance for Law Enforcement (CALEA) Petitions | Corres & 159 | $6,945.00 | CLEA |

[83 FR 38051, Aug. 3, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 44736, July 13, 2023]
## Weldon E. (Don) Havins, M.D., J.D. Professor ofOphthalmology Director and Professor ofMedical Jurisprudence Touro UniversityNevada 874 American Pacific Drive Henderson, NV 89014 Phone: (702) 777-3131 Fax: (702) 777-4825

June 12, 2012

Docket Management Facility U.S. Department ofTransportation e-mail whavins@cox.net cellphone: (702} 338-5872 website www. whavins.com

1200 NewJersey Ave, SE Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590
Re: DocketNumber: FAA-2012-0350
Dear Sirs: Residence 88 Ancient Hills Lane Henderson, NV 89074 Phone: (702) 796-6868

Fax: (702) 796-6868**·~='"** co I am writing in support ofthe AOPA/EAA Medical Exemption request. I am an ATP rated pilot (single engine and multi-engine) and a former Senior AviationMedical Examiner. I have held CFI, CFII, and MEl certificate, and have approximately 2500 hours flying time. Currently, I hold a second class medical. I now fly for personal pleasure rather than for business.
In all my years performing FAApilotmedical exams, it was and remains my impression, especially as applied to third-class medical holders, that once the certificate was issued they did not think about medical conditions related to flying until their next mandated FAA medical exam. The notion ofan educationcourse, included with an exemption, requiring pilots to selfaccess their health status priorto flight is an excellent idea. To limit initial application ofthe exemptionto 180 horsepower, fixed gear, daylight flying seems prudent until sufficient data can be obtained to verify the wisdom ofthe exemption. Eliminating the burden ofobtaining a third-class medical certificate for pilots flying recreationally will increase participation in aviation, which has been declining in General Aviation. Educating recreational pilots to evaluate their fitness to fly should increase safety. The lack ofa requirement for a third class medical in the sportpilot category appears to have been successful. I urge the FAA to grant the proposed exemption butmonitorthe data on safety for the next several years to recognize any increase in accidents based onpilot incapacitation/illness.

# Sinc;;;~d/ . . . . 

# 'ff 1/fru'

.

# tliiiJ**WeldonE.H~~** Director and Professor ofMedical Jurisprudence Professor ofOphthalmology Touro University Nevada College ofOsteopathic Medicine

CERTIFIEDAMERICAN BOARD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY FELLOW AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS '5: ,,**~' ~**  CERTIFIED AMERICAN BOARD'OF LEGAL MEDICINE MEMBER STATE BAR OF NEVADA 

# ,j

i
§ 303-70.202 What travel expenses may we authorize for the escort of a deceased employee's remains? You may authorize any travel expenses in accordance with Chapter 301 of this Title that are necessary for the escort of remains to: ( a ) The home or official station of the deceased; or
( b ) Any other place appropriate for interment as determined by the head of your agency.
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Research Service

Related Topics

ARS Office of International 

Research Programs 

ARS Office of International 

Research Programs Regional 

Contacts 

ARS Food Security Research 

ARS International Research 

Partnerships 

ARS Biosecurity Engagement 

Research 

Research Project: AIR QUALITY IMPACTS OF DAIRY FACILITIES IN CE

2011 Annual Report 

1a.Objectives (from AD-416) 

1) Measure and characterize the emission and vertical profile of ozone, p

compounds (VOCs), ammonia, and greenhouse gases (GHGs) from dai

2)Characterize reactions of select VOCs for the formation of ozone in re

1b.Approach (from AD-416) 

1) Measurement of the concentration profiles of PM in a commercial dair

locations from the facilities. 2) Measurement of the concentration profiles

VOCs (i.e., volatile fatty acids, alcohols, phenols, etc.) - within facility an

tubes – for VOCs b. Canisters for methane/N2O/CO2 c. Lasers and pas

sorbed to particulates as a function of particle size. 

3.Progress Report 

In 2011, we began the in-life phase of the field intensive sampling progra

monitoring the emissions of volatile organic compound (VOC) gases usin

done in August 2010, the key sources of VOCs were identified (i.e., silag

alcohols, esters, volatile fatty acids, ketones, and carbonyl compounds. A

exercise area of the dairy. Air samples have shown higher levels of alco

area. Samples were collected from the dairy facility in May and August w

You are here: ARS Home / Research / index 

ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links | Plain Writing 

FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | U

Research People & Locations Newsroom Careers 

ARS Project: AIR QUALITY IMPACTS OF DAIRY FACILITIES IN CENTRAL CALIFORNIA (421288) Annual Report Page 1 of 1

http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/projects/projects.htm?ACCN_NO=421288&showpars=true&fy=2011 12/02/13
#### § 102-37.345 When must a SASP be audited?

For each year in which a SASP receives $500,000 or more a year in surplus property or other Federal assistance, it must be audited in accordance with the Single Audit Act (31 U.S.C. 7501-7507) as implemented by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133, “Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations” (for availability see 5 CFR 1310.3). GSA's donation program should be identified by Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number 39.003 when completing the required schedule of Federal assistance.

[67 FR 2584, Jan. 18, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 23868, Apr. 25, 2006]
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 2008 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Lawrence A. Sala,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lawrence A. Sala
--------------------
Lawrence A. Sala
President and Chief Executive Officer

------------------------

Date:  November 10, 2008

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren,  Inc. and will be retained by Anaren,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       28

<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 2008 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George A. Blanton, Sr.
Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ George A. Blanton
---------------------
George A. Blanton
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

--------------------------

Date:  November 10, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren, Inc. and will be retained by Anaren, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       29
#### § 303-70.400 Must we pay transportation costs to return the deceased employee's baggage from an official TDY station?

Yes, you must pay transportation costs to return the deceased employee's baggage to their official station or residence. However, you may not pay insurance of, or reimbursement for, loss or damage to baggage.

[FTR Amdt. 2013-02, 78 FR 73106, Dec. 5, 2013, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12256, Feb. 16, 2024]
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-5819 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-166-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 1.5 $ 127.50 $0 $ 127.50 986 $125,715.00

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $125,715

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
EXHIBIT 11

                                 Statement re computation of per share earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                                                      Years ended April 30,
                                                                                ----------------------------------
                                                                                  1996                     1997
                                                                                --------               -----------
<S>                                                                            <C>                     <C>
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                           1,980,125                 2,327,084
Common Stock equivalents considered outstanding all periods in
accordance with SAB #83(1)                                                        38,349                        -
                                                                               ---------               -----------
                  Total                                                        2,018,474                 2,327,084
                                                                               =========               ===========
Net earnings (loss)                                                              197,965                (4,132,722)
                                                                               =========               ===========
Net earnings (loss) per common share                                                 .10                     (1.78)
                                                                               =========               ===========


</TABLE>


----------------
(1) Calculated using the treasury stock method.


                                      11-1