alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"2021-1260: Renesas Electronics v. Broadcom Corporation - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WbsaQXuClo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-14-2022-2021-1260-renesas-electronics-v-broadcom-corporation-audio-uploaded\/\">2021-1260: Renesas Electronics v. Broadcom Corporation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/01-14-2022-2021-1260-renesas-electronics-v-broadcom-corporation-audio-uploaded\/embed\/#?secret=WbsaQXuClo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2021-1260: Renesas Electronics v. Broadcom Corporation” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"WbsaQXuClo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Oral argument audio posted: Renesas Electronics v. Broadcom Corporation (mp3) Appeal Number: 2021-1260 To listen to more oral argument recordings, follow this link: Listen To Oral Arguments."}
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

C.A. CASYSO GMBH,

Appellant

v.

HEMOSONICS LLC,

Appellee

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF 

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES 

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________ 

2020-1444

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-

00950.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

CHRISTOPHER DRYER, Fish & Richardson PC, Washington, DC, for appellant. 

 BRIAN W. NOLAN, Mayer Brown, LLP, New York, NY, 

Case: 20-1444 Document: 89 Page: 1 Filed: 06/13/2022
argued for appellee. Also represented by LISA M. FERRI; 

YING-ZI YANG. 

 MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for 

intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE,

WILLIAM LAMARCA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and STARK, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

June 13, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1444 Document: 89 Page: 2 Filed: 06/13/2022
**Exhibit
      23.2**





**CONSENT
      OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





To:
        NextPhase Wireless, Inc.
 
 
 As
        independent Certified Public Accountants, we hereby consent to the
        incorporation  by  reference  in
        the  Annual  Report  on
        Form  10-KSB  under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of
        NextPhase  Wireless,  Inc. of
        our  report  dated  June 23,  2006 which
        includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about the
        Company’s ability to continue as a going concern,
        and  contained  in the Registration Statement No. 333-130178
        of NextPhase Wireless, Inc. Form S-8 under
        the  Securities  Act of 1933  insofar as
        such  report  relates to the  financial statements
        of NextPhase Wireless, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2006.
 
 
 /s/
        RBSM LLP
 RBSM
        LLP
 
 
 New
        York,
        New York
 July
        16,
        2007
#### § 109-45.309-54 Information Technology (IT).

IT shall be made available for sale only after the sanitizing and certification requirements of § 109-43.307-53 of this subpart have been met.
# Comments on: 18-2345: SPITZ TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION v. NOBEL BIOCARE USA, LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
```

[House Report 106-30]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
  1st Session           HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                 106-30

=======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 669, TO AMEND THE PEACE CORPS 
 ACT TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2000 THROUGH 2003 TO 
                           CARRY OUT THAT ACT

                                _______
                                

 February 24, 1999.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 83]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 83, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 669, 
``To Amend the Peace Corps Act to Authorize Appropriations for 
Fiscal Years 2000 through 2003 to Carry Out that Act'' under an 
open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided 
equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on International Relations.
    The rule provides that the bill shall be considered as 
read. The rule authorizes the Chair to accord priority in 
recognition to Members who have preprinted their amendments in 
the Congressional Record. The rule allows for the Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole to postpone votes during 
consideration of the bill, and to reduce voting time to five 
minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows a fifteen 
minute vote. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit 
with or without instructions.

                                

```
#### § 50-204.72 Safe practices for welding and cutting on containers which have held combustibles.

Welding or cutting, or both, on containers which have held flammable or combustible solids, liquids, or gases, or have contained substances which may produce flammable vapors or gases will not be attempted until the containers have been thoroughly cleaned, purged, or inerted in strict accordance with the rules and procedures embodied in American Welding Society Pamphlet A-6.0-65, edition of 1965.

[35 FR 1015, Jan. 24, 1970]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          58,028
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          43,829
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,820
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    547,193
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         132,105
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           133,735
<LOANS>                                      1,347,766
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,257,499
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,634,259
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             24,562
<LONG-TERM>                                    406,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,794
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,257,499
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                106,827
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,917
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                46,360
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               158,104
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              58,946
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,454
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           70,650
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 985
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 77,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,226
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      16,226
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,932
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.32
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,012
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,049
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,024
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,129
<RECOVERIES>                                       194
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,589
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,589
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                2404
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         9372
<ALLOWANCES>                                           160
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     16582
<PP&E>                                                1731
<DEPRECIATION>                                        1321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       21273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                11388
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                54
<OTHER-SE>                                            9774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         21273
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     39631
<CGS>                                                36434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        40798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      33
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (566)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (634)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (634)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.11)
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"22-1696: HIP, INC. v. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UsbRlc1t2y\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/07-01-2022-22-1696-hip-inc-v-hormel-foods-corporation-order-22-1696-order-7-1-2022_1972721\/\">22-1696: HIP, INC. v. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/07-01-2022-22-1696-hip-inc-v-hormel-foods-corporation-order-22-1696-order-7-1-2022_1972721\/embed\/#?secret=UsbRlc1t2y\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“22-1696: HIP, INC. v. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"UsbRlc1t2y\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: HIP, INC. v. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 22-1696 Origin: DCT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
# Comments on: 17-2556: UMBANET, INC. v. EPSILON DATA MANAGEMENT, LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN RE COMPLAINT NO. 85 

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge. 

O R D E R

 A complaint of judicial misconduct was received by the court on February 19, 

2008.*

 The complaint is directed to conduct of the three judges who formed the merits 

panel that affirmed the lower court's judgment. Complainant states (1) that he assumes 

"the judgment opinion and mandate could have been ordered by an attorney outside the 

rules and procedures of the Court, possibly by the clerk," (2) that he believes the briefs 

were not reviewed, (3) that the record contained "gross material/factual errors," (4) that 

the production of evidence in the lower court was obstructed, and (5) that the judges 

and the clerk of court used "an internal wireless communications device" in collaboration 

with the Federal Bureau of Investigation to obstruct the appeal process. 

 Concerning the first and second allegations, the complainant states without 

support that he assumes or believes that misconduct occurred. Because those 

assertions lack sufficient evidence to raise an inference that misconduct has occurred, 

they are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § (b)(1)(A)(iii). 

 Concerning the third and fourth allegations, the complainant's assertions are 

directly related to the merits of the court's decision. Thus, those allegations are 

dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 352(b)(1)(A)(ii). 

 Concerning the fifth allegation, the complainant offers no support for his assertion 

that the judges used an "internal wireless communications device" and thus his 

 *

 The complaint was first received on February 6, 2008 but was returned to 

the complainant because it was not in compliance with the court's rules. 
Complaint No. 85 2

assertion is dismissed as lacking sufficient evidence to raise an inference that 

misconduct has occurred. 28 U.S.C. § (b)(1)(A)(iii). 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 352(b)(1)(A)(ii) and 28 

U.S.C. § 352(b)(1)(A)(iii). 

 February 25, 2008 /s/ Paul R. Michel 

 Date Paul R. Michel 

 Chief Judge 

 The complainant may petition the court for review of this order. Such a petition 

for review must be received in the clerk's office within 30 days of the date of the clerk's 

letter transmitting this order.
EXHIBIT 32.0



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Andrea Electronics Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                                                            
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2004 |  | /s/ PAUL E. DONOFRIO                                                                       
|                   |  | Paul E. Donofrio Chief Executive Officer and President                                     
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ CORISA L. GUIFFRE                                                                      
|                   |  | Corisa L. Guiffre Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary
§ 109-45.302-50 Sales to DOE employees and designated contractor employees. ( a ) DOE employees and employees of designated contractors shall be given the same opportunity to acquire Government personal property as is given to the general public, provided the employees warrant in writing prior to award that they have not either directly or indirectly: ( 1 ) Obtained information not otherwise available to the general public regarding usage, condition, quality, or value of the personal property, or
( 2 ) Participated in: ( i ) The determination to dispose of the personal property;
( ii ) The preparation of the personal property for sale; and
( iii ) Determining the method of sale.
( b ) Excess or otherwise unusable special, fitted clothing and other articles of personal property, acquired for the exclusive use of an individual employee, may be sold to the employee for the best price obtainable when the property is no longer required by the holding organization or the employee is terminated.
#### § 51-9.101-3 Content of systems of records.

The Executive Director shall maintain in records only such information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish an agency purpose required by statute or executive order. Such records shall not contain any information describing how any individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment unless specifically authorized by statute, by the subject individual, or is pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity. For these purposes, First Amendment rights include, but are not limited to, religious and political beliefs, freedom of speech, the press, assembly, and freedom to petition.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 09/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.11 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
064A16

#### In the Matter of the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by William Gerald Price in the Original Amount of $190,000.00 Dated December 12, 2002, Recorded in Book 286, Page 113, Ashe County Registry Substitute Trustee Services, Inc., Substitute Trustee

1. Respondent’s *Pro Se*Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-639)

1.-

2. Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

2. Allowed