alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Joseph J. BouffardName:

Joseph J. BouffardTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Michael J. DeeName:

Michael J. DeeTitle:

Senior-Vice President andChief Financial Officer


Date: September 13, 2006
F OR P UB LIC AT ION 

### U N I TED STA TES C O U R T O F A PPEA LS F O R T H E N IN T H C IR C U IT

R I C HAR D D. H URL ES , Petitioner-Appellant , v. C H A RLES L. RYAN , Respondent-

Appellee
. No. 08-99032

D.C. No. CI V- 00 -0 11 8- PHX -R CB District of Arizona, Pho e nix ORDER
Filed Ma rch 19, 2013 Be fore : Harr

y Preg erson, Dor othy

W. Nelson, a nd Sand ra S. Iku ta , Ci rc uit

Judg e s.
OR DE R The Court take s the respond en t ’s Motion for Ruling on Respondent-Appe llees’ Petition for R eh ear ing E n Ba nc and the petitioner’s Motion t o rema nd pursuant to Martinez v. Ryan , 132 S.Ct . 1309 (2012), u n d er submissi on. The Court de f e r s r u li n g o n th e s e mo ti o n s p e n d in g th e r e s o luti on of Detrich v . Ryan , No. 08-99001. IT IS SO ORDERED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0517 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SHANE CLARK JOHNSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 12, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening b rief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 31 2022

08/31/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0517
443 

444 

445 

446 

447 

448 

449 

450 

451 

452 

453 

454 

455 

456 

457 

458 

459 

460 

461 

462 

463 

464 

465 

466 

467 

468 

469 

470 

471 

472 

473 

474 

475 

476 

477 

478 

479 

480 

481 

482 

483 

484 

485 

486 

487 

488 

489 

490 

491 

492 

493 

494 

495 

496 

497 

498 

499 

500 

501 

502 

503 

504 

505 

506 

507 

508 

509 

510 

511 

512 

513 

514 

515 

516 

517 

518 

519 

520 

521 

522 

523 

524 

525 

526 

527 

528 

529 

530 

531 

532 

533 

534 

535 

536 

537 

538 

539 

540 

541 

542 

543 

544 

545 

546 

547 

548 

549 

550 

551 

552 

553 

554 

555 

556 

557 

558 

559 

560 

561 

562 

563 

564 

565 

566 

567 

568 

569 

570 

571 

572 

573 

574 

575 

576 

577 

578 

579 

580 

581 

582 

583 

584 

585 

586 

587 

588 

589 

590 

591 

592 

593 

594 

595 

596 

597 

598 

599 

600 

601 

602 

603 

604 

605 

606 

607 

608 

609 

610 

611 

612 

613 

614 

615 

616 

617 

618 

619 

620 

621 

622 

623 

624 

625 

626 

627 

628 

629 

630 

631 

632 

633 

634 

635 

636 

637 

638 

639 

640 

641 

642 

643 

644 

645 

646 

647 

648 

649 

650 

651 

652 

653 

654 

655 

656 

657 

658 

659 

660 

661 

662 

663 

664 

665 

666 

667 

668 

669 

670 

671 

672 

673 

674 

675 

676 

677 

678 

679 

680 

681 

682 

683 

684 

685 

686 

687 

688 

689 

690 

691 

692 

693 

694 

695 

696 

697 

698 

699 

700 

701 

702 

703 

704 

705 

706 

707 

708 

709 

710 

711 

712 

713 

714 

715 

716 

717 

718 

719 

720 

721 

722 

723 

724 

725 

726 

727 

728 

729 

730 

731 

732 

733 

734 

735 

736 

737 

738 

739 

740 

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2010-12-23T16:22:08-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated January 26, 2017, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-214675) of Smart Trust 294,
comprising Smart Trust, Smart Ten Trust, Series 7.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


January 26, 2017
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Johnson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                          DATE: AUGUST 11, 2006


                                          /S/ DAVID J. JOHNSON
                                          --------------------
                                          DAVID J. JOHNSON
                                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT
126 STAT. 1302 PUBLIC LAW 112–169—AUG. 10, 2012 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3363: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

June 29, considered and passed Senate. 

Aug. 1, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–169 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To provide for the use of National Infantry Museum and Soldier Center Commemorative Coin surcharges, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM AND SOLDIER CENTER 

COMMEMORATIVE COIN SURCHARGES. 

Section 6(b) of the National Infantry Museum and Soldier 

Center Commemorative Coin Act (Public Law 110–357, 122 Stat. 

3999) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 

following: ‘‘, and for the retirement of debt associated with building 

the existing National Infantry Museum and Soldier Center’’. 

Approved August 10, 2012. 

31 USC 5112 

note. 

Aug. 10, 2012 

[S. 3363] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 302-6.22 What methods may my agency use to reimburse me for TQSE? ( a ) Your agency may use one of the following TQSE methods: ( 1 ) TQSE—Lodgings-Plus (TQSE-LP);
( 2 ) TQSE—Actual Expense (TQSE-AE); or
( 3 ) TQSE—Lump Sum (TQSE-LS).
( b ) Your agency will reimburse you for TQSE under the “lodgings-plus” method unless it offers you one or more of the alternate methods. If your agency makes multiple methods available to you, you may select the one you prefer; however, once your travel has begun, the authorized TQSE method may not be changed.
#### § 302-7.200 How are charges paid and who makes the arrangements for transporting HHG, PBP&E and temporary storage under the actual expense method?

Your agency is responsible for making all the necessary arrangements for transporting HHG, PBP&E, and temporary storage, including but not limited to packing/unpacking, crating/uncrating, pickup/delivery, weighing, line-haul, etc., under the actual expense method. Your agency will issue a Bill of Lading or any other shipping document with all charges billed directly to the agency. Any cost or weight in excess of 18,000 pounds will be at your expense. If the shipment exceeds the maximum weight prescribed in § 302-7.2, the Government will pay the total charges and the employee will reimburse the Government for the cost of transportation and other charges applicable to the excess weight.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Amdt. 108, 67 FR 57969, Sept. 13, 2002]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0466 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. CHRISTOPHER HORN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 16 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 5 2024

10/07/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0466
369A15

#### State v. John Joseph Carvalho, II

1. Def’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Dissent under N.C.G.S. § 7A-30 (COA14-1251)

1.-

2. Def’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-30

2.-

3. Def’s PDR as to Additional Issues Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Allowed

4. State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

4. Allowed
§ 101.1 Scope and authority. ( a ) Part 1 of the Commission's rules contains the general rules of practice and procedure applicable to proceedings before the Commission and for the filing of applications for radio station licenses in the fixed microwave services.
( b ) The purpose of the rules in this part is to prescribe the manner in which portions of the radio spectrum may be made available for private operational, common carrier, 24 GHz Service and Local Multipoint Distribution Service fixed, microwave operations that require transmitting facilities on land or in specified offshore coastal areas within the continental shelf.
( c ) The rules in this part are issued pursuant to the authority contained in Titles I through III of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, which vest authority in the Federal Communications Commission to regulate common carriers of interstate and foreign communications, to regulate radio transmissions and issue licenses for radio stations, and to regulate all interstate and foreign communications by wire and radio necessary to the accomplishment of the purposes of the Act.
[61 FR 26677, May 28, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 23163, Apr. 29, 1997; 63 FR 68981, Dec. 14, 1998; 65 FR 59357, Oct. 5, 2000]
#### EX PARTE Curtis J. COOK, Jr.

CR-14-0144

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

03/12/2015

Transferred to Ct. of Civ. App.
158P16

#### Larry Brandon Moore v. Judge Jesse B. Caldwell, III

Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for Petition for Order to Show Cause Under Common Law

Dismissed
# Comments on: 22-1915: COOPERMAN v. SSA [OPINION], Nonprecedential
294PA14

#### Robert E. King and wife, Jo Ann O’Neal v. Michael S. Bryant, M.D., and Village Surgical Associates, P.A.

Court’s Motion for Supplemental Briefing

Special Order 02/19/2016
#### § 10.460 Retransmission frequency. [Reserved]
No. 11-15.

#### Blackstone Group, L. P., et al. *v.*Litwin et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1120 Error claims. ( a ) Applicants who wish to challenge a staff determination of an insufficient fee or delinquent debt may do so in writing. A challenge to a determination that a party is delinquent in paying the full application fee must be accompanied by suitable proof that the fee had been paid or waived (or deferred from payment during the period in question), or by the required application payment and any assessment penalty payment (*see* § 1.1118). Failure to comply with these procedures will result in dismissal of the challenge. These claims should be addressed to the Federal Communications Commission at the address indicated in 47 CFR 0.401(a), Attention: Financial Operations, or emailed to *ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov .*
( b ) Actions taken by Financial Operations staff are subject to the reconsideration and review provisions of §§ 1.106 and 1.115 of this part, EXCEPT THAT reconsideration and/or review will only be available where the applicant has made the full and proper payment of the underlying fee as required by this subpart. ( 1 ) Petitions for reconsideration and/or applications for review submitted by applicants that have not made the full and proper fee payment will be dismissed; and
( 2 ) If the fee payment should fail while the Commission is considering the matter, the petition for reconsideration or application for review will be dismissed.
[52 FR 5289, Feb. 20, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 40889, Oct. 19, 1988. Redesignated at 59 FR 30998, June 16, 1994. Redesignated at 60 FR 5326, Jan. 27, 1995, as amended at 65 FR 49763, Aug. 15, 2000; 69 FR 27848, May 17, 2004. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 3445, Jan. 21, 2009; 85 FR 64405, Oct. 13, 2020]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","provider_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov","author_name":"25005pwpadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/author\/25005pwpadmin\/","title":"21-2097: BORUSAN MANNESMANN BORU SANAYI VE TICARET A.S. v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qfkKjdIeUb\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/07-01-2022-21-2097-borusan-mannesmann-boru-sanayi-ve-ticaret-as-v-us-order-21-2097-order-7-1-2022_1973025\/\">21-2097: BORUSAN MANNESMANN BORU SANAYI VE TICARET A.S. v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/07-01-2022-21-2097-borusan-mannesmann-boru-sanayi-ve-ticaret-as-v-us-order-21-2097-order-7-1-2022_1973025\/embed\/#?secret=qfkKjdIeUb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“21-2097: BORUSAN MANNESMANN BORU SANAYI VE TICARET A.S. v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\" data-secret=\"qfkKjdIeUb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"ORDER Posted: BORUSAN MANNESMANN BORU SANAYI VE TICARET A.S. v. US [ORDER](pdf) Appeal Number: 21-2097 Origin: CIT Nonprecedential To see more opinions and orders, follow this link: Opinions and Orders."}
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4347 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4347

   To amend title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 to permit the 
       conversion of wetlands that are one acre or less in size.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 1994

Mr. Smith of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Penny, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Fields 
of Texas, Mr. Ewing, Mr. Allard, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Roberts, 
Mr. Smith of Oregon, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Baker of Louisiana, Mr. Herger, and 
 Mr. Everett) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 to permit the 
       conversion of wetlands that are one acre or less in size.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Bill may be cited as the ``Down To Earth Tiny Wetland Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. CONVERSION OF WETLANDS THAT ARE ONE ACRE OR LESS IN SIZE.

    Section 1222(b)(2) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 
3882(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (A);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B) 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) a wetland that is one acre or less in size as 
                determined by the Secretary, except that the Secretary 
                shall make a reasonable effort to make an on-site 
                wetland inspection whenever requested by an owner or 
                operator.''.

                                 <all>
```
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date:  August      14, 2008 |   | /s/ DOULGAS J. ANDREA                                                                                                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |   | Douglas      J. AndreaChairman      of the Board, President,      Chief ExecutiveOfficer      and Corporate Secretary |
|   |                                  |   |                                                                                                                  |
|   |                                  |   | /s/ CORISA L. GUIFFRE                                                                                                 |
|   |                                  |   | Corisa      L. GuiffreVice      President, Chief Financial Officer      and Assistant CorporateSecretary              |
#### § 6.4 Attendance.

For regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, members are expected to attend in person. Unless prohibited by law or by these bylaws, however, a member of the Board, under exceptional circumstances, may participate in a meeting of the Board by conference telephone, video conference, or similar communications equipment which enables all persons participating in the meeting to hear each other and which permits full compliance with the provisions of these bylaws concerning public observation of meetings. Attendance at a meeting by this method constitutes presence at the meeting and a member of the Board may be paid for his or her participation provided such meeting addresses substantive, as opposed to procedural or administrative, matters on which the Board has decision making authority.

[86 FR 10014, Feb. 18, 2021]
No. 11-5003.

#### Wade *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.