alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 1494-197, Oklahoma]

An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. The EA analyzes the environmental impacts of Grand River Dam Authority's (GRDA) application to grant a permit to John W.  Mayes (applicant) to install 9 boat docks with 84 slips in Grand Lake O' The Cherokees (Grand Lake), the reservoir for the Pensacola Hydroelectric Project. GRDA's proposed permit would also allow the applicant to dredge about 33,557 cubic yards of sediment to improve boat access from the docks to Grand Lake. The Pensacola Project is on the Grand (Nesho) River in Craig, Delaware, Mayes, and Ottawa Counties, Oklahoma.

                    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Energy Projects, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. In the EA, Commission staff conclude that approving GRDA's application to grant the permit would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Copies of the EA can be viewed on the web at                     *www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm.*                     Call (202) 208-2222 for assistance. Copies are also available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE, Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16424  Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 302-3.201 If my immediate family member and I both transfer to the same official station in the interest of the Government, may we both claim the same relocation expenses?

No, when separate allowances are authorized under this § 302-3.201, the employing agency or agencies shall not make duplicate reimbursement for the same claimed expenses.
#### § 302-3.400 What is a “temporary change of station (TCS)”?

A TCS means the relocation to a new official station for a temporary period while performing a long-term assignment, and subsequent return to the previous official station upon completion of that assignment.
Rockingham

No. 80-048

#### The State of New Hampshire v. James R. Gorman, III

October 2, 1980

*686
      *Gregory H. Smith,*acting attorney general, and *Peter W. Mosseau,*assistant attorney general, by brief for the State.

*James R. Gorman, III,*by brief, pro se.

Memorandum Opinion

On November 30, 1978, the Hampton District Court found the defendant guilty of criminal trespass (RSA 635:2). He appealed to the Rockingham County Superior Court but did not pay the $8 filing fee. His case, therefore, was remanded to the district court for execution of the sentence, and he was notified of the remand on January 15, 1979. On January 30, 1979, he notified the superior court that he considered the fee to be unconstitutional and refused to pay it. The defendant was ordered to report for imposition of sentence on April 25, 1979. He filed a motion in superior court to reinstate his appeal, which was denied by *Bean,*J. The defendant did not take exception to the denial.

On March 7, 1979, we decided, in *State v. Cushing,*119 N.H. 147, 399 A.2d 297 (1979), that the filing fee requirement was unconstitutional. The defendant contended that this ruling should be made retroactive to apply to his case and moved in superior court to reinstate his appeal. The motion was denied by *Temple,*J., and defendant appealed to this court.

We expressly limited the holding in *Cushing*to “pending appeals where the fee has not yet been paid.” *Id.*at 148, 399 A.2d at 298. The defendant’s appeal was not pending on the date of the *Cushing*decision. He had been notified of the remand and, although he stated his claim of unconstitutionality, he took no appeal from the remand. His case is therefore unlike *State v. Givner,*119 N.H. 778, 407 A.2d 824 (1979), where the defendant’s appeal was held to be pending because she was not notified of the remand until after the date of the *Cushing*decision and had no prior opportunity to appeal.

We hold that the decision in *State v. Cushing*does not apply to defendant’s case.

*Appeal dismissed.*
Exhibit
32(a)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael G.
Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Michael G.
Morris____________


Michael
G. Morris


Chief
Executive Officer








October
31, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
§ 303-70.300 When an immediate family member, residing with the employee, dies while the employee is stationed OCONUS, must we furnish mortuary services? Yes, if requested by the employee and when: ( a ) Local commercial mortuary facilities or supplies are not available; or
( b ) The cost of available mortuary facilities or supplies is prohibitive as determined by your agency head.
Note to § 303-70.300 :
The employee must reimburse you for all furnished mortuary facilities and supplies.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

No vember 3, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00549

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G. a Child,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014

- PA

- 01476 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights. The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on November 2, 2015 . On November 2, 2015 , appellant filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief.

The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Accordingly, this appeal is required to be brou ght to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal wa s filed. Id

. The motion is GRANTED, and appellant’s brief must be filed no later than November 23, 2015 . Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of November, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Angelica Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen M. O'Hara, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

            (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly
                      presents, in all material respects, the financial
                      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  September 8, 2005
                                      /s/ Stephen M. O'Hara
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Stephen M. O'Hara
                                      Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN TIMOTHY UNDERWOOD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:05-cr-00025-SGW-1; 7:06-cv-00706-SGW) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 5, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Timothy Underwood, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: John Timothy Underwood seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Underwood has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Underwood’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP00-389-000]

                    Take notice that on June 13, 2000, ONEOK WestTex Transmission, Inc. (WesTex), 100 West Fifth Street, P.O. Box 871, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74102, a Hinshaw pipeline, filed in Docket No. CP00-389-000 an application pursuant to section 284.224(b) of the Commission's regulations, seeking confirmation that it has a blanket certificate, or in the alternative to grant such a blanket certificate. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims,htm*                     (call 202-208-2222).                

Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with reference to said application should on or before July 10, 2000, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16419  Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 82 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 82

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the Civil Service 
   Retirement and Disability Fund be excluded from the budget of the 
                       United States Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

Mr. Bilirakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the Civil Service 
   Retirement and Disability Fund be excluded from the budget of the 
                       United States Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 8348 of 
title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(n) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the receipts and 
disbursements of the Fund--
            ``(1) shall not be included in the totals of--
                    ``(A) the budget of the United States Government as 
                submitted by the President; or
                    ``(B) the congressional budget (including 
                allocations of budget authority and outlays provided 
                therein);
            ``(2) shall be exempt from any general budget limitation 
        imposed by statute on expenditures and net lending (budget 
        outlays) of the United States Government; and
            ``(3) shall be exempt from any order issued under part C of 
        the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 
        1985.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S MARCH 31, 2000 AUDITED BALANCE SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT AND CASH
FLOW STATEMENT, AND NOTES THERETO, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   15,678,501
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,041,480
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       625,204
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 926,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,271,379
<COMMON>                                     2,695,308
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          5,398,302
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               8,093,610
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         4,324,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             655,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   94,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               5,104,769
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               18,271,379
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,063,515
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            14,202
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     914,400
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     928,602
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        134,913
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              68,425
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 203,338
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       117,885
<NET-INCOME>                                    85,453
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   85,453
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       198,953
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0<F1>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       (121,234)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
<FN>
<F1>Not reported on an interim basis
</FN>


</TABLE>
No. 10-11046.

#### McSwain *v.*Indiana.

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certio-rari denied.
016P16

#### Maurice Antonio Burris v. Kelly J. Thomas, Commissioner of the North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles

1. Petitioner’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-312)

1. Allowed 01/20/2016

Dissolved 04/13/2016

2. Petitioner’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Denied

3. Petitioner’s PDR under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Denied

4. Respondent’s Motion to Strike Appendix to PDR

4. Dismissed as moot
§ 102-80.20 What are Federal agencies' responsibilities concerning the abatement of radon? Federal agencies have the following responsibilities concerning the abatement of radon in space when radon levels exceed current EPA standards: ( a ) Retest abated areas and make lessors retest, as required, abated areas to adhere to EPA standards.
( b ) Test non-public water sources (in remote areas for projects such as border stations) for radon according to EPA guidance. Radon levels that exceed current applicable EPA standards must be mitigated. Federal agencies must retest, as required, to adhere to EPA standards.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EC00-96-001]

Take notice that on June 20, 2000, P&L Coal Holdings Corporation, Citizens Power LLC, Citizens Power Holdings One, LLC and FC Energy Finance I, Inc., tendered for filing a supplement to the Application for Order Authorizing Sale of Equity Interests filed with the Commission on May 23, 2000 in the above-referenced docket.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before July 7, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16567  Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M