Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 128 / Monday, July 3, 2000 / Notices 41093

Enforcement Administration to be

registered as an importer of the basic

classes of controlled substances listed

below:

Drug Schedule

Methamphetamine (1105) ............ II

Penylacetone (8501) .................... II

The firm plans to import the

phenylacetone to manufacture

methamphetamine and to import

racemic methamphetamine for

resolution into the d- and 1-

stereoisomers.

Any manufacturer holding, or

applying for, registration as a bulk

manufacturer of these basic classes of

controlled substances may file written

comments on or objections to the

application described above and may, at

the same time, file a written request for

a hearing on such application in

accordance with 21 CFR 1301.43 in

such form as prescribed by 21 CFR

1316.47.

Any such comments, objections, or

requests for a hearing may be addressed,

in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant

Administrator, Office of Diversion

Control, Drug Enforcement

Administration, United States

Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register

Representative (CCR), and must be filed

no later than August 2, 2000.

This procedure is to be conducted

simultaneously with and independent

of the procedures described in 21 CFR

1301.349b), (c), (d), (e), and (f). As noted

in a previous notice at 40 FR 43745–46

(September 23, 1975), all applicants for

registration to import basic classes of

any controlled substances in Schedule I

or II are and will continue to be required

to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant

Administrator, Office of Diversion

Control, Drug Enforcement

Administration that the requirements

for such registration pursuant to 21

U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21

CFR 1301.34(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f)

are satisfied.

Dated: June 21, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–16675 Filed 6–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–09–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Manufacturer of Controlled

Substances; Notice of Application

Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title

21 of the Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR), this is notice that on May 3,

2000, and May 10, 2000, ISP Freetown

Fine Chemicals, Inc., 2328 South Main

Street, Assonet, Massachusetts 02702,

made application by letter to the Drug

Enforcement Administration (DEA) for

registration as a bulk manufacturer of

the basic classes of controlled

substances listed below:

Drug Schedule

Amphetamine (1100) .................... II

Phenylacetone (8501) .................. II

The firm plans to bulk manufacture

amphetamine for a customer and to bulk

manufacture the phenylacetone for the

manufacture of the amphetamine.

Any other such applicant and any

person who is presently registered with

DEA to manufacture such substance

may file comments or objections to the

issuance of the proposed registration.

Any such comments or objections

may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to

the Deputy Assistant Administrator,

Office of Diversion Control, Drug

Enforcement Administration, United

States Department of Justice,

Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA

Federal Register Representative (CCR),

and must be filed no later than

September 1, 2000.

Dated: June 21, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–16676 Filed 6–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–09–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service

[INS No. 2077–00]

Opportunity to File Untimely Motions

to Reconsider Decisions Denying EB–

2 Immigrant Visa Petitions

AGENCY: Immigration and Naturalization

Service, Justice.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice informs

concerned parties (prospective

employers who have filed certain EB–2

immigrant visa petitions) of the

opportunity to file untimely motions to

reconsider Service decisions denying

EB–2 immigrant visa petitions. The

Service is publishing this notice in

accordance with an order issued May 4,

2000, by the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

(Chesney, J.), in the case entitled

Chintakuntla v. INS, No. C99–5211

MMC (N.D.Cal.). This notice is

necessary to ensure that all persons who

are able to file motions to reconsider in

accordance with the Court’s order have

notice of their right to do so.

DATES: This notice is effective July 3,

2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Podolny, Associate General

Counsel, Chief of the Examinations

Division, Office of the General Counsel,

Immigration and Naturalization Service,

425 I Street, NW., Room 6100,

Washington, DC 20536, telephone

number (202) 514–2895.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Why Is the Service Publishing This

Notice?

On March 20, 2000, the Service

published a policy memorandum (the

March 20, 2000, Service Memorandum)

clarifying the requirements that govern

the adjudication of immigrant visa

petitions filed under section 204 of the

Immigration and Nationality Act (Act)

to classify aliens as preference

immigrants as aliens who are members

of the professions holding advanced

degrees or the equivalent (EB–2

immigrants). The March 20, 2000,

Service Memorandum provided

guidance for Service officers who, in

adjudicating EB–2 immigrant visa

petitions, must determine whether the

job offered to the alien beneficiary

actually requires a member of the

professions holding an advanced degree

or the equivalent. The March 20, 2000,

Service Memorandum also addresses

the issue of what sort of experience the

job must require of a person with only

a bachelor’s degree, in order for the

position to qualify as a position

requiring an advanced degree or the

equivalent. This March 20, 2000,

Service Memorandum is particularly

relevant in cases in which the labor

certification (ETA–750) does not clearly

indicate whether a person with a

bachelor’s degree must have 5 years

post-baccalaureate progressive

experience in the profession in order to

meet the minimum qualifications for the

job.

If a person who has standing wants

the Service to reconsider a Service

decision in a case, the person may file

a motion to reconsider the decision.

Under 8 CFR 103.5(a)(1)(i), the person