alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Solutions
Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the three months period ended March 31, 2009
(the "Report"), Praveen Nair Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1). To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

                                                        DATE: MAY 20, 2009

                                                        /S/ PRAVEEN NAIR
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        PRAVEEN NAIR
                                                        CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4359 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4359

   To require a study and report on environmental restoration at the 
                       Nevada Test Site, Nevada.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 1994

 Mr. Kopetski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require a study and report on environmental restoration at the 
                       Nevada Test Site, Nevada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT ON ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AT NEVADA TEST 
              SITE.

    (a) Study.--(1) The Secretary of Energy shall conduct a study to 
determine the total cost of environmental restoration activities needed 
to be conducted at the Nevada Test Site, Nevada, as a result of nuclear 
weapons testing at the Site.
    (2) The Secretary of Energy shall conduct the study in cooperation 
with any other Federal agencies the Secretary considers appropriate. 
The Secretary of Energy shall invite representatives of the Government 
of Great Britain to participate in the conduct of the study.
    (b) Report.--Not later than May 1, 1995, the Secretary of Energy 
shall submit to the Congress a report on the results of the study.

                                 <all>
```
SCPR-24-0000556

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

IN RE PATRICK A. PASCUAL, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN IN GOOD STANDING

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign from the 

practice of law in the State of Hawaiʻi, filed by attorney 

Patrick A. Pascual (Petitioner), pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the 

Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi (RSCH), which 

the court construes as also seeking to retain the paper license 

as a memento, as authorized by RSCH Rule 1.10(b), and the 

declarations submitted in support thereof, we conclude that 

Petitioner has complied with the requirements of RSCH Rule 1.10. 

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition to resign is 

granted. Petitioner may retain the paper license as a memento.

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-24-0000556

27-SEP-2024

03:32 PM

Dkt. 7 OGP
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g) 

that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, declaration, and 

record requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16(a), (b), (d) and (g).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the 

name of Petitioner, attorney number 3614, from the roll of 

attorneys of the State of Hawaiʻi, effective with the filing of 

this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, September 27, 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
375A15

#### Dabeeruddin Khaja v. Fatima Husna

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA14-701)

1.-

2. Pit’s Motion to Dismiss Def’s Notice of Appeal

2. Allowed

3. Pit’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Allowed

4. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Temporary Stay

4. Denied 11/25/2015

5. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

5. Dismissed as moot
404 A.2d 1359

#### Commonwealth v. Paradiso, Appellant.

Submitted October 26, 1978.

Roberto Paradiso, in propria personam; Charles W. Johns, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, HESTER and WATKINS, JJ.

Order of the court below is affirmed.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

STREET SPIRIT IP LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

EHARMONY, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2023-2441

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in No. 2:23-cv-02252-MCSJPR, Judge Mark C. Scarsi.

______________________

O R D E R

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by 

Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the 

rules, it is 

Case: 23-2441 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 01/29/2024
2 STREET SPIRIT IP LLC V. EHARMONY, INC.

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same 

hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

January 29, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 29, 2024

Case: 23-2441 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 01/29/2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN THE MATTER OF THE AMENDMENT OF

STANDARDIZED FORMS APPENDED TO ORDER

RULES OF PROCEDURE. 1

It has been brought to this Court’s attention that the standardized forms appended to

various rules of procedure included within the Montana Code Annotated contain incorrect

date references to ” 19-” whereas the correct date references should be “20-“.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that, effective on the date of this order the date references to “19-”

in the standardized forms appended to such rules are amended to read “20-“, and the Code

Commissioner for the State of Montana is directed to correct such references accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall prepare and mail

copies of this Order to:

The Code Commissioner and Director of Legal Services for the State of Montana;

James H. Goetz, Chairman of the Advisory Commission on Rules of Civil and

Appellate Procedure;

The President and Executive Director of the State Bar of Montana with the request

that this order be published in the next available issue of The Montana Lawyer and

on the State Bar’s Webpage;

The State Reporter Publishing Company with the request that this order be published

in the State Reporter; and

The State Law Librarian with the request that this order be published on the State Law

Library’s Webpage. “R*

.-4

1

OCT 2 3 2001
I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,037
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                       121
<INVENTORY>                                      2,723
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   328
<PP&E>                                           6,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,769
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,064
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        667
<COMMON>                                         2,606
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,036)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,635
<SALES>                                          8,340
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,340
<CGS>                                            6,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (554)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (593)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)


</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 1027

_____________________________
D ENISE M. S TOCKER , Appellant,

v.

R ONALD E. S HOLES , P.A.
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Tyrie W. Boyer , Judge

. October 30, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Denise M. Stocker, pro se, Appellant

. Joseph S. Miller of Ronald E. Sholes, P.A., Jacksonville
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

OF PINNACLE
DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005

The undersigned is the President, Chief Executive Officer, and Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the Issuer). This Certification is made pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Issuer for the annual period ended December 31, 2005.

I, Michael R. Sayre, certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

This certification is executed as of March 30, 2006.



/s/ Michael R. SayrePresident, Chief Executive Officer, and Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
No. 11-5007.

#### Jenkins *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Second Amendment
                                to the
         AMP Incorporated 1993 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan
          (as Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1995)


     Pursuant to an action taken by the Board of Directors of AMP Incorporated
on July 22, 1997, the AMP Incorporated 1993 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan, as
amended and restated in its entirety effective January 1, 1995 and amended in
part effective as of October 23, 1996 by the First Amendment to the AMP
Incorporated 1993 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan (the "1993 Plan"), is further
amended effective as of July 22, 1997 in the following respects:

1.   Section 12(a)(iii) of the 1993 Plan is amended to delete the term "50%" in
     subpart (A) thereof and to substitute the term "66 2/3%" in lieu thereof.

2.   The first paragraph of Section 18(b) of the 1993 Plan is amended and
     restated as follows:

     "b)  The Committee may, in its sole discretion, either at the time of an
          Award under the Plan or thereafter upon request of a Participant,
          authorize all or a portion of the Options granted or to be granted to
          a Participant to be on terms that permit the transfer of such Options
          by the Participant to (i) the spouse, children or grandchildren of
          Participant (the "Immediate Family Members"), (ii) a trust or trusts
          for the exclusive benefit of such Immediate Family Members, (iii) a
          partnership in which such Immediate Family Members are the only
          partners, or (iv) such other persons or entities as the Committee, in
          its sole discretion, may permit. Such transfer of Options by a
          Participant shall only be permitted if 1) the Option Agreements
          covering the transferable Options are approved or amended by the
          Committee and expressly provide for transferability in a manner
          consistent with this Section 18, 2) subsequent transfers of
          transferred Options are prohibited except to the extent they occur by
          will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and 3) the
          Participant remains responsible for any Federal, state and/or local
          withholding tax requirements upon exercise of the transferred
          Options."

     Except as provided above, all terms, conditions and provisions of the 1993
Plan shall remain in full force and effect and without any further change or
modification whatsoever.

Executed this 25th day of September, 1997.


                                        AMP Incorporated
                                        
   Attest:___________________      By:  _________________________
          Corporate Secretary              J. E. Marley
                                           Chairman
§ 0.121 Location of field installations. ( a ) Field offices are located throughout the United States. For the address and phone number of the closest office contact the Enforcement Bureau or see the U.S. Government Manual.
( b ) Protected field offices are located at the following geographical coordinates (coordinates are referenced to North American Datum 1983 (NAD83)):
Allegan, Michigan, 42°36′20.1′′ N. Latitude, 85°57′20.1′′ W. Longitude Belfast, Maine, 44°26′42.3′′ N. Latitude, 69°04′56.1′′ W. Longitude Canandaigua, New York, 42°54′48.2′′ N. Latitude, 77°15′57.9′′ W. Longitude Douglas, Arizona, 31°30′02.3′′ N. Latitude, 109°39′14.3′′ W. Longitude Ferndale, Washington, 48°57′20.4′′ N. Latitude, 122°33′17.6′′ W. Longitude Grand Island, Nebraska, 40°55′21.0′′ N. Latitude, 98°25′43.2′′ W. Longitude Kenai, Alaska, 60°43′26.0′′ N. Latitude, 151°20′15.0′′ W. Longitude Kingsville, Texas, 27°26′30.1′′ N. Latitude, 97°53′01.0′′ W. Longitude Laurel, Maryland, 39°09′54.4′′ N. Latitude, 76°49′15.9′′ W. Longitude Livermore, California, 37°43′29.7′′ N. Latitude, 121°45′15.8′′ W. Longitude Powder Springs, Georgia, 33°51′44.4′′ N. Latitude, 84°43′25.8′′ W. Longitude Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico, 18°00′18.9′′ N. Latitude, 66°22′30.6′′ W. Longitude Vero Beach, Florida, 27°36′22.1′′ N. Latitude, 80°38′05.2′′ W. Longitude Waipahu, Hawaii, 21°22′33.6′′ N. Latitude, 157°59′44.1′′ W. Longitude [53 FR 29054, Aug. 2, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 8477, Mar. 5, 1996; 63 FR 68918, Dec. 14, 1998; 64 FR 60718, Nov. 8, 1999; 67 FR 13219, Mar. 21, 2002; 69 FR 58097, Sept. 29, 2004]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40586

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GERARDO CONTRERAS-MONTOYA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-137-1

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gerarado Contreras-Montoya

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40586

2

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 11-124.

#### Heartwood 88, LLC, et al. *v.*BCS Services, Inc., et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 302-5.5 Must my agency authorize payment of a househunting trip expenses allowance?

No, your agency determines when it is in the Government's interest to authorize you a househunting trip and the procedures you must follow if it is authorized.
§ 51-9.304-5 Reproduction fee schedule. ( a ) The fee for reproducing a copy of a record (by routine electrostatic copying) up to and including material 81 ⁄ 2 × 14 inches shall be $0.10 per page.
( b ) The fee for reproducing a copy of a record over 81 ⁄ 2 × 14 inches or whose physical characteristics do not permit reproduction by routine electrostatic copying shall be the direct cost of reproducing the records through Government or commercial sources.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements at June 30, 1998 (unaudited) and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (79)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,016
<PP&E>                                           1,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (371)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,818
<SALES>                                          3,416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,416
<CGS>                                            2,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     63
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 58
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        58
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
Supreme Court ofthe United States

Office ofthe Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

October 19, 2015 (202)479-3011

Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

P.O. Box 12308

Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

Re: Steven LaWayne Nelson

v. Texas

No. 15-5265

(Your No. AP-76,924)

Dear Clerk:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

4-fy

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OCT 26 2015

AbeIAco8ta,Cte?k
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3751-3752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1640]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3206]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Science Under Sail: Russia's Great Voyages to 
America, 1728-1867''

DEPARTMENT: United States Department of State.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Science Under Sail: Russia's 
Great Voyages to America, 1728-1867,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Anchorage Museum of History 
and Art, Anchorage, Alaska, from on or about May 4, 2000,

[[Page 3752]]

to on or about October 22, 2000; the California Academy of Sciences, 
San Francisco, California, from early February to early May, 2001; and 
perhaps at other U.S. venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Lorie J. Nierenberg, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-6084). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44; 301-4th 
Street, S.W., Room 700, Washington, D.C. 20547-0001.

    Dated: January 17, 2000.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-1640 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P