alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FOR THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS AT TEXARKANA, TEXAS

CHRISTIAN SIBLEY '

Appellant

V. ' CASE NO. 06-15 -00009- CR TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-2143 THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee '

THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT = S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

NOW COMES, CHRISTIAN SIBLEY, the Appellant herein, and moves the Court for an

extension of time to file Appellant = s Brief in this cause, pursuant to Rules 38.6 and 10.5 (b) of

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and in support thereof would show the Court as follows:

I.

The Appellant in this cause was convicted in County Court at Law One, Gregg County,

Texas in cause number 2013-2143 for the offense of Escape from Custody. On October 20,

2014, punishment was assessed at three hundred thirty (330) days in the County Jail.

II.

The Reporter = s record was filed on February 9, 2015. The Appellant = s Brief is due on or

about May 1, 2015.

III.

The Appellant hereby requests an extension of time to file Appellant = s Brief.

The undersigned counsel has been unable to devote sufficient time to the review of the

record, research and preparation of Appellant = s Brief for the following good and sufficient

reasons: ACCEPTED 06-15-00009-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 5/1/2015 10:34:28 AM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK1. Defense Counsel has been involved in a very busy trial and appellate schedule in bot h

state and federal courts.

2. Counsel underwent surgery in Boston Massachusetts and is still under a doctor’s care.

(See letter from Dr. Rotzler attached.)

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned counsel, on behalf of

Appellant, respectfull y prays that this Honorable Court extend the time for filing Appellant = s

Brief for an additional seven (07) days, to Friday, May 8, 2015.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

__/s/ Clement Dunn____

___ Attorney for Appellant 140 E. Tyler Street, Suite 240 Longview, TX 75601 (903) 753

- 7071 Fax (903) 753

- 8783 State Bar # 06249300CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

As Attorney of Record for Defendant, I do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy of

the above and foregoing document was this date provided to the Attorney for the State.

Date: 05

- 01

- 15

__/s/ Clement Dunn____

___ Attorney for AppellantFOR THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS AT TEXARKANA, TEXAS

CHRISTIAN SIBLEY '

Appellant

V. ' CASE NO. 06

- 15

- 00009

- CR TRIAL COURT NO. 2013

- 2143 THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee '

ORDER

BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the _____ day of __________________, 2015, came

on to be considered the above and foregoing Third Motion for Extension of Time to File

Appellant = s Brief. After consideration of the same, it is the opinion of the Court that Appellant = s

Motion be:

( ) GRANTED, and the present cause is hereby extended until _________________,

2015.

( ) DENIED, to which ruling the Appellant excepts.

( ) SET FOR HEARING ON THE _ ____ day of __________________, 2015, at

_____ o = clock_____.

SIGNED:

_____________________________ JUDGE PRESIDING
Summary of EPA Meeting with INDA, Association of Nonwoven Fabrics Industry

November 28, 2011

On Monday, November 28, 2011, representatives from EPA’s Office of Resource Conservation and 

Recovery (ORCR) and the Office of General Counsel (OGC) met with representatives of INDA regarding

implementation of the Solvent-Contaminated Industrial Wipes rulemaking. INDA reiterated comments 

they submitted on the 2003 proposed rule regarding whether the wipes rule may be promulgated under the 

Hazardous Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, which would have implications for when the rule would be 

effective in authorized states. INDA also urged EPA to make the rule effective as soon as possible.

Attendees:

Amanda Geldard, EPA/ORCR

Mary Andrews, EPA/OGC

Jessica Franken, INDA

Karl Bourdeau, Beveridge & Diamond
#### § 50-202.1 Application and scope.

Not less than the minimum wages prescribed in this part shall be paid to employees described in § 50-201.102 of this chapter when their work relates to contracts subject to the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act. The minimum wages prescribed in this part shall apply to all contracts bids for which are solicited or negotiations otherwise commenced on or after the effective date of the applicable determination. Nothing in this part shall affect any obligations for the payment of minimum wages that an employer may have under any law or agreement more favorable to employees than than the requirements of this part.

(Secs. 1, 4, 49 Stat. 2036, 2038; 41 U.S.C. 35, 38)

[26 FR 9043, Sept. 26, 1961]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-712 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DOUBLE TAXATION 

 Convention Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SRI LANKA 

Signed at Colombo March 14, 1985 

 and 

Protocol Amending the Convention 

Signed at Washington September 20, 2002 

with 

Exchange of Notes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 SRI LANKA 

 Double Taxation 

Convention signed at Colombo March 14, 1985, and 

 protocol amending the convention signed at Washington 

 September 20, 2002, with exchange of notes; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate October 2, 1985 (Treaty Doc. 99-10, 99th Congress, 

 1st Session) and October 28, 2003 (Treaty Doc. 108-9, 

 108th Congress, 1st Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 March 4, 2004 (Senate Executive Report No. 108-11, 

 108th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 March 25, 2004; 

Ratified by the President May 18, 2004; 

Exchange of Instruments of Ratification at Colombo July 12, 2004; 

Entered into force July 12, 2004. 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32










NOTE: At this time, the Sinhalese text has not been created. Once received and authenticated, the Sinhalese text will be added to this publication.
S89A0014.

#### RAYMER v. COBB COUNTY et al.

(385 SE2d 407)

Hunt, Justice.

This appeal concerns a dispute over title to property. Raymer executed warranty deeds to two parcels in Cobb County for a right-of-way for the Cobb East-West Connector. The deeds provided, inter alia: “If after two years from the date of this right-of-way deed, construction of the road has not been funded through this property, at the option of the owner, this right-of-way deed shall be null and void.” Two years later, Raymer sent a letter to the county attorney giving notice that he revoked his dedication because construction of the right-of-way had not been funded. Several years later, the county *587had the deeds recorded and executed a construction contract for the road across Raymer’s property. Raymer brought this action against the county and county attorney seeking interlocutory relief and damages. He appeals from the trial court’s grant of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denial of his motion for summary judgment.

Decided November 22, 1989.

*Johnson & Montgomery, Harmon W. Caldwell, Jr., Harry W. MacDougald,*for appellant.

*Sams, Glover & Gentry, Richard W. Calhoun,*for appellees.

1. Raymer contends the trial court erred by granting the county’s motion for summary judgment, and argues there was no effective conveyance of the deeds. In his letter to the county attorney enclosing the deeds, Raymer stated “I am delivering these right of way deeds to you in trust to be held and not delivered until such time as this project is fully approved and funded for the construction of this road through the property of Richard E. Raymer. . . .”

If conditions for transfer of title are not met, no conveyance is made. *Cedeno v. Lockwood, Inc.,*250 Ga. 799, 801 (1) (301 SE2d 265) (1983). Here, however, there are numerous questions of fact including whether the deeds were delivered to the county attorney; whether the delivery of the deeds was conditional on full funding of the road within two years; whether the road was in fact funded within two years; whether Raymer ratified a transfer of his properties to the county or was otherwise estopped from denying a transfer or dedication to the county, and whether the deeds were void on Raymer’s notice of revocation. Thus, the trial court erred by granting summary judgment to the county, but did not err by denying Raymer’s motion for summary judgment.

2. The trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the county attorney as there is no evidence of any action by that party which would support a claim for Raymer’s alleged damages under state or federal law.

*Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part.*

*All the Justices concur.*
084A16

#### Faires, et al. v. State Board of Elections, et al.

John V. Orth’s Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief

Allowed 03/30/2016

Edmunds, J.

recused
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4191

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 9630 Estate Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands,

as the ‘‘Aubrey C. Ottley Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Post Office building located at

5 9630 Estate Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands,

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Aubrey C. Ottley

7 Post Office’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the building
2

HR 4191 EH

1 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

2 to the Aubrey C. Ottley Post Office.

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
3

HR 4191 EH
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4191

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building

Office’’.Virgin Islands, as the ‘‘Aubrey C. Ottley Postlocated at 9630 Estate Thomas in Saint Thomas,
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4242

_____________________________

GREGORY ALLEN FOREMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

October 16, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****United States--east coast, NewJersey and Delaware, Delaware River, Smyrna River to Wilmington [electronicresource] /**
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.418/7:12311/

Item Number:0191-B-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000878955
 
1974-77 | 1979-82
 
April 22, 2020
No. 11-9172.

#### Hermansen *v.*Parker, Warden, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39627-39628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16144]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-220 1020 XQ 2527]


Front Range Resource Advisory Council (Colorado); Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 
(FACA), 5 U.S.C. appendix, notice is hereby given that the next meeting 
of the Front Range Resource Advisory Council (Colorado) will be held on 
July 13, 2000 in Buena Vista, Colorado.
    The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m. at the Buena Vista 
Community Center, 715 E. Main Street, Buena Vista, Colorado. The focus 
of the meeting will be a field trip to the Fourmile area where the 
Fourmile Travel Management planning is in progress.
    The Resource Advisory Council meeting is open to the public, 
however they will need to provide their own transportation for the 
field trip. A Four-wheel drive vehicle is recommended. Interested 
persons may make oral

[[Page 39628]]

statements to the Council at 9:45 a.m. or written statements may be 
submitted for the Council's consideration. The Center Manager may limit 
the length of oral presentations depending on the number of people 
wishing to speak.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, July 13, 2000 from 9:30 
a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Front Range Center, 3170 
East Main Street, Canon City, Colorado 81212

CONTACT: For further information contact Ken Smith at (719)269-8500

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summary minutes for the Council meeting will 
be maintained in the Canon City Center and will be available for public 
inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within thirty 
(30) days following the meeting.

    Dated: June 20, 2000.
Kenneth L. Smith,
Acting Front Range Center Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-16144 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CARAVAN CANOPY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Appellant

v.

Z-SHADE CO., LTD., COSTCO WHOLESALE 

CORPORATION, LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, 

LLC, SHELTERLOGIC CORP., 

Appellees

______________________

2022-1642

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-

01026, IPR2021-00449.

______________________

O R D E R

The appellant having failed to file an appendix 

required by Federal Circuit Rule 30(a) within the time 

permitted by the rules, it is 

Case: 22-1642 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 01/20/2023
2 CARAVAN CANOPY INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. Z-SHADE CO., LTD.

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same 

hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

January 20, 2023

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 20, 2023

Case: 22-1642 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 01/20/2023
•

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 167 B

Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV -

Hazardous Soils Treatment Standards and Exclusions

63 FR 28556-28753

May 26,1998

(RCRA Cluster VIll, HSWA provisions)

SPA 19

•

•

t

STATEANALOG IS:

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERALRCRAcrrAnON ANALOGOUS SfATEerrAnON

WAC LESS MORE 173-303- EQUIV- STRIN- STRIN- BROADER

ALENT GENT GENT IN SCOPE

PART 268 - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS

SUBPART A-GENERAL

DEFINITIONS APPLICABLE IN THIS PART

140(2)(a)

40 CPR 268 is

add new paragraph; incorporated by

268.2(k) reference. The X definition of soil remaining checklist

entries were deleted to

save space and paper.

268.49(e)(2)(B) 140(2)(a) X End ofIER

May 26, 1998 - Page 1 of 7 CLl67B - Revised: 1/15/99

Printed: 12119/01
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-930-1430-ET; COC-61608]


Public Land Order No. 7455; Withdrawal of Public Land for the 
Saguache Smelter Site, Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order withdraws 60 acres of public land from surface 
entry and mining for a period of 20 years for the Bureau of Land 
Management to protect the Saguache Smelter Site. The land has been and 
will remain open to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 30, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris E. Chelius, BLM Colorado State 
Office, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7076, 303-239-
3706.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Subject to valid existing rights, the following described public 
land is hereby withdrawn from settlement, sale, location, or entry 
under the general land laws, including the United Stated mining laws 
(30 U.S.C. Ch. 2, (1994)), but not from leasing under the mineral 
leasing laws, for the Bureau of Land Management to protect the Saguache 
Smelter Site:

New Mexico Principal Meridian

T. 45 N., R. 7 E.,
    Sec. 26, S\1/2\S\1/2\S\1/2\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 35, N\1/2\N\1/2\NE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 60 acres in Saguache County.

    2. The withdrawal made by this order does not alter the 
applicability of those public land laws governing the use of the land 
under lease, license, or permit, or governing the disposal of the 
mineral or vegetative resources other than under the mining laws.
    3. This withdrawal will expire 20 years from the effective date of 
this order, unless, as a result of a review conducted before the 
expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) (1994), the Secretary 
determines that the withdrawal shall be extended.

    Dated: June 7, 2000.
Sylvia V. Baca,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 00-16602 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Converted by EDGARwiz


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO

SENIOR SECURED CREDIT FACILITY AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO SENIOR SECURED CREDIT FACILITY AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 10th day of February, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), by and between VAPOR HUB INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Nevada corporation (“Borrower”), and PLY TECHNOLOGY (“Holder”).

RECITALS

A.

Borrower and Holder previously entered into that certain Senior Secured Credit Facility Agreement on December 23, 2016 (the “Agreement”);

B.

Borrower and Holder each desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Borrower and Holder hereby agree as follows:

1.

Definitions.  Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings given such terms in the Agreement.

2.

Amendments.  The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

(a)

The reference to “February 15, 2017” appearing in the definition of “Maturity Date” is hereby deleted and replaced with “March 30, 2017”.

(b)

The reference to “February 28, 2017” appearing in Section 6.2 is hereby deleted and replaced with “March 30, 2017”.

3.

Miscellaneous.  Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, all of the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  All references in the Agreement to “Agreement,” “hereunder,” “hereof” or words of like import referring to the Agreement shall mean and be a reference to the Agreement as and to the extent it is amended by this Amendment.  All references to the Agreement in the Loan Documents entered into in connection with the Agreement, as such documents have been amended, shall mean and be a reference to the Agreement as and to the extent it is amended by this Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment, or have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers, as of the day and year first above written.














VAPOR HUB INTERNATIONAL INC,

a Nevada corporation




		
	By:

	/s/ Lori Winther


	 
	Lori Winther


	Title:

	Chief Financial Officer








PLY TECHNOLOGY.

		
	By:

	/s/ Thomas Li


	 
	Thomas Li


	Title:

	Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40671-40672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Gene Expression in Cancer by Microarray Hybridization.
    Date: July 19, 2000.
    Time: 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 40672]]

    Place: Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Sherwood Githens, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer 
Institute, Special Review, Referral and Resources Branch, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 8068, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1822.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Innovative Technologies for the Molecular Analysis of Cancer.
    Date: July 20-21, 2000.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Sherwood Githens, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes Of Health, National Cancer 
Institute, Special Review, Referral and Resources Branch, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 8068, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1822.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 26, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-16610 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 10-11027.

#### Tanner *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 304-8.1 For the purpose of this subchapter, who is a donor?

A donor, for the purpose of this subchapter, is a non-profit charitable organization described by 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3), that is exempt from taxation under 26 U.S.C. 501(a).

[FTR Amdt. 2003-02, 68 FR 12604, Mar. 17, 2003]