alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Weldon E. (Don) Havins, M.D., J.D. 

Professor of Ophthalmology 

Director and Professor of Medical Jurisprudence 

Touro University Nevada 

874 American Pacific Drive 

Henderson, NV 89014 

Phone: (702) 777-3131 

Fax: (702) 777-4825 

June 12, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

e-mail whavins@cox.net 

cellphone: (702} 338-5872 

website www. whavins.com 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket Number: FAA-2012-0350 

Dear Sirs: 

Residence 

88 Ancient Hills Lane 

Henderson, NV 89074 

Phone: (702) 796-6868 

Fax: (702) 796-6868 

·~='" 

co 

I am writing in support ofthe AOPA/EAA Medical Exemption request. I am an ATP rated pilot 

(single engine and multi-engine) and a former Senior Aviation Medical Examiner. I have held 

CFI, CFII, and MEl certificate, and have approximately 2500 hours flying time. Currently, I 

hold a second class medical. I now fly for personal pleasure rather than for business. 

In all my years performing FAA pilot medical exams, it was and remains my impression, 

especially as applied to third-class medical holders, that once the certificate was issued they did 

not think about medical conditions related to flying until their next mandated FAA medical 

exam. The notion of an education course, included with an exemption, requiring pilots to selfaccess their health status prior to flight is an excellent idea. To limit initial application of the 

exemption to 180 horsepower, fixed gear, daylight flying seems prudent until sufficient data can 

be obtained to verify the wisdom of the exemption. 

Eliminating the burden of obtaining a third-class medical certificate for pilots flying 

recreationally will increase participation in aviation, which has been declining in General 

Aviation. Educating recreational pilots to evaluate their fitness to fly should increase safety. 

The lack of a requirement for a third class medical in the sport pilot category appears to have 

been successful. I urge the FAA to grant the proposed exemption but monitor the data on safety 

for the next several years to recognize any increase in accidents based on pilot 

incapacitation/illness. 

Sinc;;;~d/ . . . . 

'ff 1/fru' . tliiiJ WeldonE.H~~ Director and Professor of Medical Jurisprudence 

Professor of Ophthalmology 

Touro University Nevada College of Osteopathic Medicine 

CERTIFIED AMERICAN BOARD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 

FELLOW AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS 

'5: ,, 

~' ~ 

CERTIFIED AMERICAN BOARD' OF LEGAL MEDICINE 

MEMBER STATE BAR OF NEVADA 

,j 

i
FORM 16. Informal Opening Brief (GAO Personnel Appeals Board, OCWR, EEOC, Secretary Form 16 (p. 3)

of Agriculture, Secretary of Labor, OSHRC, FLRA, and Bureau of Justice Assistance Cases) March 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

INFORMAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER

Case Number:

Short Case Caption:

Name of Petitioner:

Instructions: Read the Guide for Unrepresented Parties before completing this 

form. Answer the questions as best as you can. Attach additional pages as needed 

to answer the questions. This form and continuation pages may not exceed 30 pages.

Attach a copy of the agency’s opinion and/or order. You may also attach other record 

material as an appendix. Any attached material should be referenced in answer to 

the below questions. Please redact (erase, cover, or otherwise make unreadable) 

social security numbers or comparable private personal identifiers that appear in any 

attachments you submit.

1. Have you ever had another case in this court? ☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, state the name and number of each case.

2. Did the agency incorrectly decide or fail to take into account any facts?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, what facts?
FORM 16. Informal Opening Brief (GAO Personnel Appeals Board, OCWR, EEOC, Secretary Form 16 (p. 3)

of Agriculture, Secretary of Labor, OSHRC, FLRA, and Bureau of Justice Assistance Cases) March 2023

3. Did the agency apply the wrong law? ☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, what are your arguments concerning those issues?

4. Did the agency fail to consider important grounds for relief? ☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, on what grounds?

5. Are there other reasons why the decision was wrong? ☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, what reasons?
FORM 16. Informal Opening Brief (GAO Personnel Appeals Board, OCWR, EEOC, Secretary Form 16 (p. 3)

of Agriculture, Secretary of Labor, OSHRC, FLRA, and Bureau of Justice Assistance Cases) March 2023

6. What action do you want this court to take in this case?

Date: _________________ Signature:

Name:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IDEAHUB INC., 

Appellant

v.

UNIFIED PATENTS, INC., 

Appellee

______________________

2022-1626

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-

01338.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

April 21, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 21, 2022

Case: 22-1626 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 04/21/2022
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

**MOSSIMO, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Mossimo, Inc. (theCompany) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I Vicken Festekjian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of myknowledge:

(1)         The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.3,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the Company.
| /s/ VICKEN FESTEKJIAN      |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|
| Vicken  Festekjian         |   |
| *Chief Financial  Officer* |   |
| March 31, 2004        |   |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINALOF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THECOMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF UPONREQUEST.

THIS CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-K TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILEDWITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE INTO A FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THESECURITIES ACT OF 1934 (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-K),IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING.

----
# D ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0657 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee, v. DANIEL E. NEWBY,

Defendant and Appellant. 

# FILED MAR 0

## 3 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court O R llyEgRof IVInntana

Appellant Daniel E. Newby has filed a second motion for a 60-day extension oftime within which to file his opening brief. Upon consideration ofAppellant's motion for extension oftime, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant's motion for extension is GRANTED. Appellant has until May 9 0\ 2022, within which to file his opening brief. DATED this 

### 3 day ofMarch, 2022. For the Court,
ChiefJustice 03/03/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0657
FORM 6B. USERRA Notification Form Form 6B

July 2020

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

USERRA NOTIFICATION FORM

Case Number:

Short Case Caption:

Petitioner:

Instructions: In a petition for review of a Merit Systems Protection Board decision, 

a petitioner is not required to pay the docketing fee or costs if the petitioner is 

claiming rights under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment 

Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA). See 38 U.S.C. §§ 4323, 4324. Please review the 

below statements and sign and submit this form if the underlying appeal at the 

Board involved a USERRA claim and you are pursuing your rights under USERRA 

on appeal. The signed original should be submitted within 14 days after the case is 

docketed. 

CERTIFICATION OF USERRA APPLICABILITY

1. I certify that the petitioner is not required to pay the docketing fee or costs in

this case because the underlying appeal at the Merit Systems Protection

Board involved a USERRA claim and I am pursuing my rights under

USERRA on appeal.

2. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that

the foregoing is true and correct. See 28 U.S.C § 1746.

Date: _________________ Signature:

Name:
#### § 301-71.309 What internal policies and procedures must we establish governing travel advances?

Accountability for cash advances for travel, recovery, and reimbursement shall be in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Government Accountability Office (see Government Accountability Office Policy and Procedures Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies, Title 7, Fiscal Procedures).

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15974, Apr. 1, 1998. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 108, 67 FR 57967, Sept. 13, 2002, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61539, Oct. 31, 2007]
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21

                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant


<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                       State or Other              
                                       Jurisdiction of   Percentage 
                                       Incorporation     Ownership  
                                       -------------     ---------  
<S>                                    <C>               <C> 
Parent                                                              
------                                                             
Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.                 Maryland             --


Subsidiary (1)
----------

The Patapsco Bank                      Maryland            100%


Subsidiaries of The Patapsco Bank (1)
---------------------------------

PFSL Holding Corp.                     Maryland            100%
</TABLE> 

----------
(1) The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in
    the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report to
    Stockholders attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
October20,2015DavidBrymer,DirectorAirQualityDivisionUNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGION61445ROSSAVENUE,SUITE1200DALLASTX75202-2733TexasCommissiononEnvironmentalQualityP.O.Box13087Austin,TX78711DearMr.Brymer:ThankyoufortherecommendationsregardingtheattainmentstatusofselectedareasinTexasunderthe2010sulfurdioxide(S02)nationalambientairqualitystandard(NAAQS)thatyouragencysenttousonSeptember18,2015.Asyouknow,wearesubjecttoaMarch2,2015,courtorderdirectingustopromulgateS02designationsfortheseareasundersection107oftheCleanAirActbyJuly2,2016.Specifically,wearerequiredtopromulgatedesignationsfortheseareasbecausetheycontainsourcesmeetingtheS02emissionscriteriaidentifiedintheconsentdecree.TheinformationyouprovidedonSeptember18,2015,willgreatlyhelpusmeetthisduty,andensureprotectionofpublichealthinTexas.Inadditiontotheinformationyouhaveprovided,wehaverecentlyreceivedmodelingandrelatedinformationfromtheSierraClubthatisrelevanttoasubsetoftheareastobeaddressedbyJuly2,2016.Inyourstate,wehavereceivedinformationpertinenttotheareaneartothefollowingpowerplants:WAParishElectricGeneratingStation;LimestoneGeneratingStation;BigBrownSteamElectricStation;MartinLakeElectricalStation;andMonticelloSteamElectricStation.Weareenclosingacompactdiscthatcontainsthisinformation.Pleaseletusknowifyouhaveanyquestionsabouttheinformationwehavereceivedorifyouneedanyadditionalinformation.IamwritingtosolicityourreviewoftheinformationthatSierraClubhasprovided,sothattheEPAcanbaseitsdesignationdecisionsonthebestavailableinformation.TheCleanAirActprovidesfordesignationstobedevelopedthroughapartnershipofstateagenciesandtheEPA;however,wealsobelieveitisimportanttoconsidersignificantandrelevantinformationthatmembersofthepublicprovidetous.ConsistentwiththestructureoftheCleanAirAct,webelievethatthebestfirststepinaddressingthisinformationwouldbeforyouragencytoprovideitsreviewofthisinformation.SincetheSierraClub'srecommendationdiffersfromyourrecommendation,wewouldwelcomeyourcommentarygenerallyontheinformationaswellasyourdetailedreviewoftheelementsofSierraClub'sanalysis.Totheextentpracticable,wewouldappreciatequantitativecomparisonsofdatausedinSierraClub'sanalysiscomparedtothedatausedinyouranalysis,tohelpusevaluatetheelementsofthetwoanalyses.WewouldappreciateyourreviewofSierraClub'sinformationbyNovember17,2015.Yourtimelyreviewwouldprovideusvaluableassistanceinourreviewofyourdesignationrecommendationsanddevelopmentofourintendeddesignations,whichweareaimingtocompletebytheendofJanuary2016.InternetAddress(URL)•http:/twww.epa.gov/region6Recycled/Recyclable•PrintedwithVegetableOilBasedInkson100%Postconsumer,ProcessChlorineFreeRecycledPaperWewillthenpublishnoticeofourintendeddesignationsforpubliccomment,and,asrequiredbytheCleanAirAct,promulgatefinaldesignationsnosoonerthan120daysaftergivingyounoticeofthem.PleasecontactmeorJamesE.Gradyofmystaffat214-665-6745oratgrady.james@epa.govifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthisrequest.Enclosure:cdSincerely,{/Lf'GuyDonaldsonChiefAirPlanningSection
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Analysts International Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2008, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), theundersigned, Elmer N. Baldwin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 10, 2008 | By:    | /s/  Elmer N. Baldwin          |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------|
|                           |                  | Elmer  N. Baldwin              |
|                           |                  | Chief  Executive Officer       |
|                           |                  | (Principal  Executive Officer) |

 

----
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4309

To require a local hiring preference for certain defense contracts and subcontracts performed in or near labor surplus areas and closing military

bases.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1994

Mr. HAMBURG (for himself, Mr. FILNER, Mr. MILLER of California, Mr. FARR

of California, and Ms. WOOLSEY) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To require a local hiring preference for certain defense contracts and subcontracts performed in or near labor surplus areas and closing military bases.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LOCAL HIRING PREFERENCE FOR CONTRACTS

4 PERFORMED NEAR LABOR SURPLUS AREAS

5 AND CLOSING MILITARY BASES.

6 (a) CONTRACTS COVERED.—Each contract entered

7 into by the Department of Defense during fiscal year 1995

8 for construction services to be performed in whole or in

9 part in a labor surplus area (or within 30 miles of such
2

•HR 4309 IH

1 an area) and within 30 miles of a military installation ap2 proved for closure or realignment under a base closure

3 law, and each subcontract under such a contract, shall in4 clude the provision described in subsection (b).

5 (b) REQUIREMENT.—Each contract and subcontract

6 described in subsection (a) shall include a provision requir7 ing the contractor or subcontractor to employ, for the pur8 pose of performing such contract or subcontract, individ9 uals—

10 (1) who are residents of such labor surplus area

11 or the county in which such labor surplus area is lo12 cated; and

13 (2) who possess or would be able to acquire

14 promptly the necessary skills for any craft or trade

15 needed to perform the contract or subcontract.

16 (c) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—(1) The Secretary of De17 fense may waive the requirements of this section for a con18 tract or subcontract covered by this section if the Sec19 retary determines that requiring the provision described

20 in subsection (b) in the contract or subcontract is incon21 sistent with the national security objectives of the United

22 States.

23 (2) The Secretary of Defense may allow a contractor

24 of a contract or subcontract covered by this section to

25 make an exception to the requirement of subsection (b)(1)
3

•HR 4309 IH

1 in the case of a particular craft or trade needed to perform

2 the contract or subcontract if there is no individual resid3 ing or available for hire in the labor surplus area or county

4 who possesses the skills for that craft or trade.

5 (d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘base clo6 sure law’’ means the following:

7 (1) The provisions of title II of the Defense Au8 thorization Amendments and Base Closure and Re9 alignment Act (Public Law 100–526; 10 U.S.C.

10 2687 note).

11 (2) The Defense Base Closure and Realignment

12 Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law

13 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note).

Æ
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4191 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4191

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 9630 
Estate Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ``Aubrey C. Ottley 
Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 9630 Estate 
Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Aubrey C. Ottley Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Aubrey C. Ottley Post Office.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.242 Appointment of case manager when Commission is the presiding officer.

When the Commission designates itself as the presiding officer in a hearing proceeding, it may delegate authority to a case manager to develop the record in a written hearing (see §§ 1.370 through 1.377). The case manager must be a staff attorney who qualifies as a neutral under 5 U.S.C. 571 and 573. The Commission shall not designate any of the following persons to serve as case manager in a case, and they may not advise or assist the case manager: Staff who participated in identifying the specific issues designated for hearing; staff who have taken or will take an active part in investigating, prosecuting, or advocating in the case; or staff who are expected to investigate and act upon petitions to deny (including challenges thereto). A case manager shall have authority to perform any of the functions generally performed by the presiding officer, except that a case manager shall have no authority to resolve any new or novel issues, to issue an order on the merits resolving any issue designated for hearing in a case, to issue an order on the merits of any motion for summary decision filed under § 1.251, or to perform any other functions that the Commission reserves to itself in the order appointing a case manager.

[85 FR 63176, Oct. 6, 2020]
# Comments on: 17-2544: PUREPREDICTIVE, INC. v. H2O.AI, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
#### § 51-9.304-2 Records available at a fee.

The Executive Director shall provide one copy of a record to the individual at a fee prescribed in § 51-9.304-5. A reasonable number of additional copies will be provided for the applicable fee where reproduction services are not readily available.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4364

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to transfer administrative jurisdiction over certain lands for inclusion in

the Cape Hatteras National Seashore.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF OCRACOKE LIGHT STATION TO

4 SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.

5 The Secretary of Transportation shall transfer ad6 ministrative jurisdiction over the Federal property, con7 sisting of approximately 2 acres, known as the Ocracoke

8 Light Station, to the Secretary of the Interior, subject to

9 such reservations, terms, and conditions as may be nec10 essary for Coast Guard purposes. All property so trans-
2

•HR 4364 EH

1 ferred shall be included in and administered as part of

2 the Cape Hatteras National Seashore.

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4364

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to transshore. for inclusion in the Cape Hatteras National Sea- fer administrative jurisdiction over certain lands
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Curtis J. Parker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Cotelligent, Inc.'s amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2001 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Cotelligent, Inc.

Date: December 5, 2002                     By: /s/ Curtis J. Parker
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Curtis J. Parker
                                           Executive Vice President and Chief
                                             Financial Officer

                                       72