alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KAPP 2982
itt pt pote wl pep ta ta

MANATEE RIVER EXTENSION
SCALE 1:40,000

MANATEE RIVER Se <r
SSRR

aon pee The controlling depths through dredged Dor i
n \ a -1. channels were: [ee

8 feet from entrance to McNeil Point (MID 50 FT) .
wa, 4 feet to Rocky Bluff (MID 50 FT) —! Sty Net
¥2 foot to Rye (Centerline)

Dec 1994 Branches Hammock
TWIN FRED BRIDGES f
HOR CL 7SFr x,

vert cL aorr ON

Ellenton

PALMETTO
ANA

b
= MED BRIDGE
& ig 44 OR CL7SFT
OP tFe4et5t anise SRT CL 40 =T .
ZV i450 oe
3 8
2 3
8 7 90 d
; >
\G-2 4
_woge| 6 > wo 14
SE eee 13

FIXED BRIDGE
HOR CL 45 FT

VERT CL@ FT
(ATCENTER)

Biron Gas
wiriere | EEE Ni
ear 535
e lge
tower © laa ———  Fxeo singe ——
ase 143 Manatee HOR CL 45 FT
NE N 282 H cart eens
2e8 * rank aun ov sert
4 aa 3 =
a bees
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 858

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to extend coverage under

the whistleblower protection provisions of the District of Columbia Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 to personnel of the courts of

the District of Columbia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Mr. DAVIS of Virginia (for himself, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Ms. NORTON, and

Mrs. MORELLA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to extend

coverage under the whistleblower protection provisions

of the District of Columbia Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 to personnel of the courts of the District

of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia

5 Court Employees Whistleblower Protection Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 858 IH

1 SEC. 2. WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION FOR PERSONNEL

2 OF THE COURTS OF THE DISTRICT OF CO3 LUMBIA.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 17 of

5 title 11, District of Columbia Code, is amended by adding

6 at the end the following new section:

7 ‘‘§ 11–1733. Whistleblower protection for court per8 sonnel

9 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, section

10 1503 of the District of Columbia Comprehensive Merit

11 Personnel Act of 1978 (DC Code, sec. 1–616.3) shall

12 apply to court personnel, except that court personnel may

13 institute a civil action pursuant to subsection (c) of such

14 section in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia

15 or the United States District Court for the District of Co16 lumbia.’’.

17 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

18 for subchapter II of chapter 17 of title 11, District of Co19 lumbia Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow20 ing new item:

‘‘11–1733. Whistleblower protection for court personnel.’’.

21 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

22 The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect

23 as if included in the enactment of title XI of the Balanced

24 Budget Act of 1997.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37, 314]


Shell Chemical Company, Point Pleasant Polyester Plant, Apple 
Grove, West Virginia; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Shell Chemical Company, Point 
Pleasant Polyester Plant, Apple Grove, West Virginia. The application 
contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly 
on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the 
application was issued.

    TA-W-37, 314; Shell Chemical Company, Point Pleasant Polyester 
Plant, Apple Grove, West Virginia (June 12, 2000).

    Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of June, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-16502 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.741 Scope.

The general rules relating to applications contained in §§ 1.742 through 1.748 apply to all applications filed by carriers except those filed by public correspondence radio stations pursuant to parts 80, 87, and 101 of this chapter, and those filed by common carriers pursuant to part 25 of this chapter. Parts 21 and 101 of this chapter contain general rules applicable to applications filed pursuant to these parts. For general rules applicable to applications filed pursuant to parts 80 and 87 of this chapter, see such parts and subpart F of this part. For rules applicable to applications filed pursuant to part 25, see said part.

[61 FR 26670, May 28, 1996]
#### § 302-12.103 May we separately contract for each type of relocation service?

Yes, you may separately contract for each type of relocation service or you may combine several types of relocation services in a single contract.
***Exhibit 32.2***

 

***CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

* *

Pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer ofAmerican Science & Engineering, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30,2003 (the “Form 10-Q/A”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

* *
|                                                               | */s/ Paul Theodore Owens* |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
| *Paul Theodore Owens*                                              |                      |
| *Executive Vice President,  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer* |                      |
|                                                               |                      |
| *June 14, 2004*                                                    |                      |
Administrative Order No. 2021-03

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit —and—

United States Court of 

Federal Claims

O R D E R

Restricting Court Access to the National Courts

Building Through January 24, 2021 

Based on continuing declared public health 

emergencies impacting Washington, D.C. and the National 

Capital Region, as well as ongoing efforts to mitigate 

community transmission and the impact of COVID-19, 

there is an ongoing need for the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States 

Court of Federal Claims to continue to restrict public 

access to the Howard T. Markey National Courts Building. 

On behalf of both courts, we find pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2071(e) that there is an immediate need for this Order

altering the rules of both courts, effective upon entry of this

Order.

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) Administrative Order No. 20-06 is hereby amended

to extend the access restrictions and procedures in

the joint order dated June 26, 2020 (Administrative

Order No. 20-04) through January 24, 2021.

CERTIFIED COPY

I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS DOCUMENT IS A 

TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE 

ORIGINAL ON FILE. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

PETER R. MARKSTEINER, CLERK OF COURT By Deputy Clerk: Date: Jarrett B. Perlow November 20, 2020
2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

(2) The Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court of the

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal

Circuit, and the Clerk of Court for the United States

Court of Federal Claims are directed to provide

public notice of this Order and to take any necessary

and proper actions to implement these restrictions.

FOR THE COURTS

November 20, 2020 /s/ Sharon Prost

 Date Sharon Prost 

Chief Judge

United States Court of

Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit

November 20, 2020 /s/ Eleni M. Roumel

 Date Eleni M. Roumel

Chief Judge 

United States Court of 

Federal Claims
#### § 302-3.226 Will the Government reimburse me if I am not eligible to return with my immediate family member(s) to the U.S. and choose to send them at my own expense?

Yes, if you pay for the prior return of your eligible immediate family member(s), you will be reimbursed when you become eligible for return travel and transportation, you must provide your agency with all receipts and documentation to support your cost. Your agency will then reimburse your expenses, not to exceed your authorized allowance.
No. 11-8914.

#### Perotti *v.*Medlin, Warden, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.10004 What am I allowed to do if I am approved?

If you are approved and receive a license or authorization, you must operate in accordance with, and not beyond, your terms of approval.
No. 11-9529.

#### Thuong Duy Hoang *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 302-17.67 How does my agency calculate my RITA under the two-year process? ( a ) Your agency calculates your RITA after receipt of your RITA voucher.
( b ) Your RITA is itself taxable income to you. To account for taxes on the RITA, your agency will gross-up your RITA by applying the CMTR to the final amount rather than the reimbursed amount.
( c ) Thus, your agency calculates your RITA by multiplying the Combined Marginal Tax Rate (CMTR) (using the state and local tax tables most current at the time of the RITA calculation) by the total of all covered taxable relocation benefits during the applicable Year 1, and then subtracting your WTA(s), if any, from the same Year 1 from that total. That is:
Where C = CMTR R = Reimbursements, allowances, and direct payments to vendors covered by WTA during Year 1 Z = Total grossed-up WTAs paid during Year 1.
Note to § 302-17.67(c)
- If your agency offers you the choice, the WTA is optional to you. If the employee has declined the WTA, enter zero for element Z in the above calculation.
#### § 105-68.455 What may I do if a lower tier participant fails to disclose the information required under § 105-68.355 to the next higher tier?

If you as an agency official determine that a lower tier participant failed to disclose information, as required by § 105-68.355, at the time it entered into a covered transaction with a participant at the next higher tier, you may pursue any remedies available to you, including the initiation of a suspension or debarment action.
No. 11-19.

#### Crager *v.*Runyan et al.

Sup. Ct. Ark. Certio-rari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 10, 2005 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|--------------------- | --------------------
|                      | John P. Manning     
|                      | Director, President 
|                      | (Principal Executive
|                      | Officer), BCTC IV   
|                      | Assignor Corp.
Searched for **http://www.nhtsa.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.nhtsa.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40122-40123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-930-1430-ET; COC-28584]


Public Land Order No. 7453; Opening of Land Under Section 24 of 
the Federal Power Act; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

[[Page 40123]]


ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order opens, subject to the provisions of Section 24 of 
the Federal Power Act, 40 acres of public land withdrawn by an 
Executive order which established Bureau of Land Management Power Site 
Reserve No. 92. This action will permit consummation of a pending land 
exchange and retain the power rights to the United States. The land has 
been and will remain open to mineral leasing and, under the provisions 
of the Mining Claims Rights Restoration Act of 1955, to mining.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 28, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris E. Chelius, BLM Colorado State 
Office, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7093, 303-239-
3706.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by the Act of June 10, 1920, Section 24, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 818 
(1994), and pursuant to the determination of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission in DVCO-556-000, it is ordered as follows:
    1. At 9 a.m. on September 28, 2000, the following described public 
land withdrawn by the Executive Order dated July 2, 1910, which 
established Power Site Reserve No. 92, will be opened to disposal 
subject to the provisions of Section 24 of the Federal Power Act as 
specified by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission determination 
DVCO-556-000, and subject to valid existing rights, the provisions of 
existing withdrawals, other segregations of record, and the 
requirements of applicable law:

Sixth Principal Meridian

T. 15 S., R. 78 W.,
    Sec. 10, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 40 acres in Chaffee County.

    2. The State of Colorado has a preference right for public highway 
rights-of-way or material sites for a period of 90 days from the date 
of publication of this order and any location, entry, selection, or 
subsequent patent shall be subject to any rights granted the State as 
provided by the Act of June 10, 1920, Section 24, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 
818 (1994).

    Dated: June 2, 2000.
Sylvia V. Baca,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 00-16460 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Circuit Mediation Office Statistics

2014 Calendar Year

(January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014)

Appeals settled: 20

• Patent: 11

• Non-patent: 9

Appeals not settled; mediation terminated: 16

• Patent: 16

• Non-patent: 0

Success rate - overall (of appeals selected for mediation): 56%

• Patent: 41%

• Non-patent: 100%
Administrative Order No. 2021-08

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit —and—

United States Court of 

Federal Claims

O R D E R

Restricting Court Access to the National Courts

Building Through May 31, 2021

Based on continuing declared public health 

emergencies impacting Washington, D.C. and the National 

Capital Region, as well as ongoing efforts to mitigate 

community transmission and the impact of COVID-19, 

there is an ongoing need for the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States 

Court of Federal Claims to continue to restrict public 

access to the Howard T. Markey National Courts Building. 

On behalf of both courts, we find pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2071(e) that there is an immediate need for this Order 

altering the rules of both courts, effective upon entry of this 

Order.

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Administrative Order No. 2021-07 is hereby 

amended to extend the access restrictions and 

procedures in the joint order dated June 26, 2020 

(Administrative Order No. 20-04) through May 31, 

2021. 

CERTIFIED COPY

I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS DOCUMENT IS A 

TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE 

ORIGINAL ON FILE. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

PETER R. MARKSTEINER, CLERK OF COURT By Deputy Clerk: Date: Patrick B. Chesnut April 27, 2021
2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

(2) The Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court of the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal 

Circuit, and the Clerk of Court for the United States 

Court of Federal Claims are directed to provide 

public notice of this Order and to take any necessary 

and proper actions to implement these restrictions.

FOR THE COURTS

April 27, 2021 /s/ Sharon Prost 

 Date Sharon Prost

 Chief Judge

United States Court of

Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit

April 27, 2021 /s/ Elaine D. Kaplan y

 Date Elaine D. Kaplan

 Chief Judge

United States Court of 

Federal Claims
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.399 Scope.

This subpart shall be applicable to notice and comment rulemakings proceedings conducted under 5 U.S.C. 553, and shall have no application to formal rulemaking (or rate making) proceedings unless the Commission directs that it shall govern the conduct of a particular proceeding.

[42 FR 25735, May 19, 1977]
#### § 302-10.206 May my agency assume direct responsibility for the costs of preparing and transporting my mobile home?

Yes, your agency may assume direct responsibility for the costs of preparing and transporting your mobile home if it is determined to be in the Government's interest.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-10988

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:16-CR-354-2

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alberto Rodriguez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has filed a response, after receiving an 

extension of time to do so. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant 

portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rodriguez’s filings. We 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 9, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-10988 Document: 00515070514 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2019
No. 18-10988

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-10988 Document: 00515070514 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2019
JARRETT B. PERLOW

CLERK OF COURT

CLERK’S OFFICE

202-275-8000

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439 

December 1, 2023

Notice Establishing Rates for Taxation of Costs

Pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 39(c), the Clerk of Court has set the following 

maximum rates at which costs may be taxed in a case with this court: 

COST TYPE ALLOWABLE COST

(I.E., MAXIMUM RATE)

Principal Brief $0.08 per page

Reply Brief 

(including response and reply brief of 

appellant in a cross-appeal)

$0.08 per page

Appendix 

(including any authorized separate or 

supplemental appendix)

$0.08 per page

Binding and Covers $2.00 per required 

paper copy

Docketing Fee 

(if paid in this court by appellant or 

petitioner only) 

$600.00 total 

These rates are unchanged for those in effect before the court’s July 1, 2020 

amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules.

This notice is posted publicly on the court’s website in accordance with Federal 

Circuit Rule 39(c).