Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 3 / Monday, January 6, 2014 / Proposed Rules 631 

submitted to the Director of NHHC as 

soon after receipt of the NOVA as 

possible. In deciding whether to submit 

such information, the respondent 

should keep in mind that the Director of 

NHHC may assess de novo a civil 

penalty, enforcement costs and/or 

liability for damages either greater or 

smaller than that assessed in the NOVA. 

§ 767.26 Criminal law. 

Nothing in these regulations is 

intended to prevent the United States 

from pursuing criminal sanctions for 

plundering of wrecks, larceny of 

Government property, or violation of 

applicable criminal law, whether the 

infringement pertains to a sunken 

military craft, a terrestrial military craft 

or other craft under the jurisdiction of 

the DoN. 

§ 767.27 References. 

References for submission of permit 

application, including but not limited 

to, and as may be further amended: 

(a) NHPA of 1966, as amended, 16 

U.S.C. 470 et seq. (1999), and Protection 

of Historic Properties, 36 CFR part 800. 

These regulations govern the section 

106 review process established by the 

NHPA. 

(b) National Environmental Policy Act 

of 1969, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et 

seq., and Protection of the Environment, 

40 CFR 1500–1508. These regulations 

require agencies to consider the effects 

of their actions on the human 

environment. 

(c) Secretary of the Interior’s 

Standards and Guidelines for 

Archeology and Historic Preservation, 

available at http://www.cr.nps.gov/locallaw/arch_stnds_0.htm. These guidelines 

establish standards for the preservation 

planning process with guidelines on 

implementation. 

(d) ARPA of 1979, as amended, 16 

U.S.C. 470aa-mm, and the Uniform 

Regulations, 43 CFR part 7, subpart A. 

These regulations establish basic 

government-wide standards for the 

issuance of permits for archaeological 

research, including the authorized 

excavation and/or removal of 

archaeological resources on public lands 

or Indian lands. 

(e) Secretary of the Interior’s 

regulations, Curation of FederallyOwned and Administered 

Archaeological Collections, 36 CFR part 

79. These regulations establish 

standards for the curation and display of 

federally-owned artifact collections. 

(f) Antiquities Act of 1906, Public 

Law 59–209, 34 Stat. 225 (codified at 16 

U.S.C. 431 et seq. (1999)). 

(g) Executive Order 11593, 36 FR 

8291, 3 CFR, 1971–1975 Comp., p. 559 

(Protection and Enhancement of the 

Cultural Environment). 

(h) Department of Defense Instruction 

4140.21M (DoDI 4140.21M, August 

1998). Subject: Defense Disposal 

Manual. 

(i) Secretary of the Navy Instruction 

4000.35A (SECNAVINST 4000.35A, 9 

April 2001). Subject: Department of the 

Navy Cultural Resources Program. 

(j) Naval History and Heritage 

Command Instruction 5510.4. 

(NAVHISTCENINST 5510.4, 14 

December 1995). Subject: Disclosure of 

Information from the Naval Shipwreck 

Database. 

N.A. Hagerty-Ford, 

Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate 

General, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2013–31068 Filed 1–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2006–0593; FRL–9905–06– 

Region–6] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Texas; Control 

of Air Pollution by Permits for New 

Construction or Modification; Permits 

for Specific Designated Facilities 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: On November 21, 2013, the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

published a direct final rule and 

accompanying proposal approving 

portions of two revisions to the Texas 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

concerning the Permits for Specific 

Designated Facilities Program, also 

referred to as the FutureGen Program. 

The direct final action was published 

without prior proposal because EPA 

anticipated no adverse comments. EPA 

stated in the direct final rule that if we 

received relevant, adverse comments by 

December 23, 2013, EPA would publish 

a timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register. EPA received a letter dated 

December 19, 2013, from the Texas 

Commission on Environmental Quality 

stating that the March 9, 2006 and July 

2, 2010 SIP revisions specific to the 

FutureGen program have been 

withdrawn from our consideration as 

revisions to the Texas SIP. Accordingly, 

EPA is withdrawing our proposed 

approval of the Texas FutureGen 

program and in a separate rulemaking in 

today’s Federal Register we are also 

withdrawing the corresponding direct 

final approval. We find that no further 

action is necessary on the Texas 

FutureGen Program March 9, 2006 and 

July 2, 2010 SIP revisions. The State’s 

action also withdraws from EPA’s 

review the FutureGen Program 

component of the January 22, 2010 

Consent Decree between EPA and the 

BCCA Appeal Group, Texas Association 

of Business, and Texas Oil and Gas 

Association. This withdrawal is being 

taken under section 110 and parts C and 

D of the Federal Clean Air Act. 

DATES: The proposed rule published on 

November 21, 2013 (78 FR 69812) is 

withdrawn as of January 6, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Adina Wiley (6PD–R), Air Permits 

Section, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue 

(6PD–R), Suite 1200, Dallas, TX 75202– 

2733. The telephone number is (214) 

665–2115. Ms. Wiley can also be 

reached via electronic mail at 

wiley.adina@epa.gov. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: December 20, 2013. 

Samuel Coleman, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2013–31434 Filed 1–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

49 CFR Part 571 

[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0132] 

Public Meeting of the U.S.-Canada 

Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) 

Motor Vehicles Working Group 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. 

ACTION: Announcement of public 

meeting. 

SUMMARY: The U.S.-Canada Regulatory 

Cooperation Council (RCC) was created 

on February 4, 2011. After private sector 

consultations and bilateral negotiations, 

the RCC released the Joint Action Plan 

on Regulatory Cooperation on December 

7, 2011. The Joint Action Plan is a 

practical first step to increased 

regulatory cooperation between the 

United States and Canada. In order to 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS