~ 

AP-42 Section 

Reference IL 

Report Sect. 

Reference 

rr- Nl r5 510~Kj 

7, c.E-Nt862 5-7, t9q4 

wi5sT -To DAtc )u-rm 

; .. 

l r"~ 

II,—{—UOcg 

/ 
"EMISSIONS SURVEY CONDUCTED AT INTERSTATE BRICK 

COMPANY, LOCATED IN WEST JORDAN UTAH" 

CEM Suoervisor: 

J. Paul Benson 

~ ~ ~ ~ • - • 

Greg E. Johnson 

Technicians: 

Ryan B. Benson 

Todd B. Benson 

Rick P. Hawkins 

JD Schiller 

David F. Hunt 

December 5-7, 1994 

mmwm m~FSra ~ 

December 22, 1994 

Pregared for: Mr. Jim Keck 

Interstate Brick Company 

9780 South 5200 West 

West Jordan, Utah 84088-5689 

Preoared by: Mr. V. Brent Benson, Technical Director 

American Environmental Testing, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 
CERT1FiCAT10N OF REPORT INTEGRITY 

AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING COMPANY, INC. (AET) cerfifies: 

1. That every effort was made to obtain accurate and representative 

data within the guidelines established by: 

A. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) Titie 40, Chapter I, Part 60, Appendix 

"A", Methods 1-5 inclusive, Method 6C, Method 7E, Method 

13B and Method 201 A/202. 

B. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency "Quality 

Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement 

Systems". 

2. All of sampling and analysis performed for the compliance test 

reported herein. were carried out by myself or under my 

supervision. 

3. The results obtained are accurate and auth nti . 

r . Johnson J. Paul enson 

M thod 201 A Crew Supervisor Crew Supervisor 

I have reviewed all testing details and methods on which the results of 

this test are based. I find them to be accurate within the limits of the 

applicable methods. 

V. Brent Benson 

Technical Director 

3 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 Introduction 

1 .1 Test Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 

2.0 Summary of Results 

2.1 PM Io Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

2.1.1 Table of PM y oEmissions Summary 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet . . . . . . . . . 4 

2.1.2 Table of PM j oEmissions Summary 

- Primary Crusher Baghouse . . . . . . . . 5 

2.1. 3 Table of PM 1 oEmissions Summary. 

- Line 3 Baghouse. . . . . . . . . . . . 5 

2.1.4 Table of PM1 oEmissions Summary 

-Line 4 Baghouse . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

2.2 S02 Emissions . . . . . . . . . . .. 

2.2.1 S02 Emissions Summary Table 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet .... 

2.2.2 S02 Emissions Summary Table 

- Tunnei Kiln No. 4 Inlet .... 

2.2.3 S02 Emissions Summary Table 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet .... 

2.3 NOXEmissions . . . . . . . . . . . 

2.3.1 NOX Emissions Summary `fable 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet. .... 

2.3.2 NOx Emissions Summary Table 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet .... 

2.3.3 NOx Emissions Summary Table 

. . . . . 6 

. . . . . 7 

. . . . . 7 

. . . . . 8 

. . . . . 8 

. . . . . 8 

. . . . . 9 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet . . . . . . . . . 9 

2.4 Visible Emissions Opacity . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

2.4.1 Summary Table of Visible Emissions 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

2.4.2 Summary Table of Visible Emissions 

- Primary Crusher Baghouse . . . . . . . . 11 

2.4.3 Summary Table of Visible Emissions 

- Line 3 Baghouse. . . . . . . . . . . . 11 

y 
2.4.4 Summary Table of Visible Emissions 

- Line 4 Baghouse. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 ' 

2.5 HF Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 

2.5.1 HF Emissions Summary Table 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet . . . . . . . . . 1.2 

3.0 Source Operation 

3.1 General Plant Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 

4.0 Sampling and Analysis Procedures 

4.1 Emissions Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 

4.1.1 Figure of Stack Diagram 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet Stack ....... 15 

4.1.2 Table of Traverse Point Calculations 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . . . . . . . . . 16 

4.1.3 Figure of Stack Diagram 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet Stack ...... 17 

4.1.4 Table' of Traverse Point Calculations 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet . . . . . . . . . 18 

4.1.5 Figure of Stack Diagram 

- Primary Crusher Baghouse Stack. ..... 19 

4.1.6 Table of Traverse Point Calculations 

- Primary Crusher Baghouse . . . . . . . . 20 

4.1.7 Figure of Stack Diagram 

- Line 3 Baghouse Stack . . . . . . . . . 21 

4.1.8 Tab(e of Traverse Point Calculations 

- Line 3 Baghouse. . . . . . . ^ . . . . 22 

4.1.9 Figure of Stack Diagram 

- Line 4 Baghouse Stack . . . . . . . . . 24 

4.1.10 Table of Traverse Point Calculations 

- Line 4 Baghouse. . . . . . . . . . . .. 25 

4.1.11 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . . . . . . . . . 26 

4.1.12 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet & Outlet ...... 27 

4.1.13 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data 

- Primary Crusher Baghouse . . . . . . . . 28 

4.1.14 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data 

- Line 3 Baghouse. . . . . . . . . . . . 29 

4.1.15 Summary Table of Field and Laboratory Data 

- Line 4 Baghouse. . . . . . . . . . . . 30 
4.1.16 Summary Table of Calculated Resuits 

- Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet . . . . . . . . . 32 

4.1.17 Summary Table of Calculated Results 

-Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet & Outlet ...... 33 

4.1.18 Summary Table of Calculated Results 

- Primary Crusher Baghouse . . . . . . . . 34 

4.1.19 Summary Table of Calculated Results 

- Line 3 Baghouse. . . . . . . . . . . . 35 

4.1.20 Summary Table of Calculated Results 

- Line 4 Baghouse. . . . . . . . . . . . 36 

4.1. 21 Figure of EPA Method 5 Sample Train ..... 3 7 - 4.1. 22 CEM Sample Train. . . . . . . . . . . . 39 

APPENDICES 

A. Approval Order 

B. AET Pretest Protocol 

C. Production Data 

D. Field & Laboratory Data 

E. , Emissions Calculations 

F. Data-Logger Sheets 

G. AET CEM Readings 

H. VEO Readings & Certification Cards 

1. Calibration Data 

I 
"EMISSIONS SURVEY CONDUCTED AT INTERSTATE BRICK 

COMPANY, LOCATED IN WEST JORDAN UTAH" 

1.oIntroduction 

~ 

At the request of Interstate Bricic Company's, Mr. Jim Keck, 

American Environmental Testing, Inc., (AET) conducted a series of 

Emissions Testing for PM1 0 , sulfur dioxide (S02), nitrogen oxides 

(NOX ) and Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) at Interstate Bricic Company's 

West Jordan Facility. These tests were accomplished during the 

period of, December 5-7, 1994. The individuai sources and the 

emissions that were quantified are listed below: 

Source 

Tunnel Kiln No . 3 Inlet 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet 

Primary Crusher Baghouse 

Line 3 Baghouse 

Line 4 Baghouse 

S02and NOX 

S02and NOX 

PMi 0, S02, NOX& HF 

PM1 o 

PM1 o 

PM10 

On October 27, 1994, The Utah Department of Environmental 

Quality (UDEQ) issued the Interstate Brick Company an "Approval 

Order" for their West Jordan Facility. A copy of the permit is 

attached as Appendix "A". In the permit, conditions were 

established for various pollutants emission levels and criteria 

were set for testing to verify compliance with these limitations. 

The UDEQ set the following emission limits from the "Approval 

Order" for each source: 

- 

1 

 - 
So-ur-c-e Pollutant Emission Limitation 

Tunnel Kiln No. 3 S02 17.0 Ibs/hr 

( I n let) NOX 1.8 Ibs/hr 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 S02 17.0 Ibs/hr 

(Inlet) NOX 1.8 Ibs/hr 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 PM10 12.3 Ibs/hr 

(Outlet) S02 51.0 Ibs/hr 

NOX 2.6 Ibs/hr 

F-F 5.7 Ibs/hr 

Primary Crusher Baghouse PM10 0.49 Ibs/hr 

0.016 gr/dscf 

Line 3 Baghouse PM10 0.37 Ibs/hr 

0.016 gr/dscf 

Line 4 Baghouse PM10 0.67 Ibs/hr 

0.016 gr/dscf 

On the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet, AET found liquid droplets in the 

gas stream at the sample port location. Because of these. 

conditions, AET tested using EPA Method 5 and 202 to quantify 

Particulate emissions (considering all particulate captured to be 

PM10). 

Mr. Keck, requested that American Environmental Testing 

Company, Inc. prepare a"Pretest Protocol" to submit to the UDEO 

outlining the required tests. The protocol, without the calibration 

data is presented in Appendix "B". 

AET performed Compliance Emissions Testing as ' set forth in the 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Chapter I, Part 60, 

Appendix "A". The following methods were used to conduct the 

emissions testing: 

Method 1 -"Sample and Velocity Traverses for 

Stationary Sources" 
Method 2 - " Determination of Stack Gas Velocity 

and Volumetric Flow Rate (type "S" 

pitot tube)" 

Method 3 -"Gas Analysis for Carbon Dioxide, 

Oxygen, Excess Air and Dry Molecular 

Weight" 

Method 4 -"Determination of Moisture Content in 

Stack Gases" 

Method 5 -"Determination of Particulate Emissions 

and Back-half Condensibles from 

Stationary Sources" 

Method 6C -"Determination of Sulfur Dioxide 

Emissions from Stationary Sources" 

(Instrumental Analyzer Procedures) 

Method 7E -"Determination of Nitrogen Oxides 

Emissions from Stationary Sources" 

(Instrumental Analyzer Procedures) 

Method 13B -"Determination of Hydrofluoric Acid 

from Stationary Sources" 

Method 201 A -"Determination of PM Ip Emissions from 

Stationary Sources" 

Method 202 - "Determination of Condensible 

Particulate Emissions from Stationary 

Sources" 

- ~ - a 
Table 2.1.2 

(PM, o Emissions Summary) 

Primary Crusher Baahouse 

Test 

Run 

DSCF 

Collected 

Emissions Rates 

Lbs/hr gr/dscf 

1 

2 

3 

23.48 

22.86 

23.10 

0.06 

0.06 

0.06 

0.0033 

0.0032 

0.0035 

-Average = 23.15 0.06 0.0033 

The average measured PM j p emission concentration for the 

Primary Crusher Baghouse was 0.06 Ibs/hr, which is 12.24% of 

the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling of 0.49 Ibs/hr and 0.0033 

gr/dscf, which is 20.63% of the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling 

of 0.016 gr/dscf. 

Table 2.1.3 

(PM1 a Emissions Summary) 

Line 3 Baghouse 

Test 

Run 

DSCF 

Collected 

Emissions Rates 

Lbs/hr gr/dscf 

1 

2 

3 

20.53 

20.80 

' 20.53 

0.11 

0.07 

0.05 

0.0039 

0.0026 

0.0020 

Average = 20.62 0.08 0.0028 

_C_ 
2.0Summary of Results 

2.1 p1V M Emissions (EPA 201A) 

The emissions data accumulated for P M I oemissions during the 

December 5-7 1994 Compliance Testing is summarized in the 

following tables for each source: 

Table 2.1.1 Tunnel Kiln No. 4- Outlet 

Table 2.1.2 Primary Crusher Baghouse 

Table 2.1.3 Line 3 Baghouse 

Table 2.1.4 Line 4 Baghouse 

Table 2.1.1 

(PM1 aEmissions Summary) 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4- Outlet 

Test 

Run 

DSCF 

Collected 

Emissions Rates 

Ibs/hr gr/dscf 

1 

2 

3 

36.5016 

39.4402 

40.3321 

6.0273 

8.7407 

11.4822 

0.0188 

0.0258 

0.0330 

Average = 38.7580 8.7501 0.0259 

The average measured PM 1p emission concentration for the 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet was 8.7501 Ibs/hr, which is 71.14% of 

the UDEO permitted allowable ceiling of 12.3 Ibs/hr. 

_d_ /~ 
u 

The average measured P M 10 emission concentration for the Line 3 

Baghouse was 0.08 Ibs/hr, which is 21.62% of the UDEQ permitted 

allowable ceiling of 0.37 Ibs/hr and 0.0028 gr/dscf, which is 

17.5% of the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling of 0.016 gr/dscf. 

Table 2.1.4 

(PM1 oEmissions Summary) 

Line 4 Baghouse 

Test 

Run 

DSCF 

Collected 

Emissions Rates 

Lbs/hr gr/dscf 

1 

.2 

3 

23.33 

21.81 

22.05 

0.08 

0.04 

0.06 

0.0060 

0.0029 

0.0041 

Average = 22.40 0.06 0.0043 

The average measured P M i oemission concentration for the Line 4 

Baghouse was 0.06 Ibs/hr, which is 8.96% of the UDEQ permitted 

allowable ceiling of 0.67 Ibs/hr and 0.0043 gr/dscf, which is 

26.88% of the UDEQ permitted allowable ceiling of 0.016 gr/dscf. 

2.2 ,SQZEmissions(EPA 6C) 

The emissions data accumulated for S0 2 emissions during the 

December 7, 1994 Compliance Emissions Testing is summarized 

in Table 2.2.1 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet, Table 2.2.2 for the 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet and Table 2.2.3 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 

l Outlet. 

_r,_ /oL 
Table 2.2.1 

(S02 Emissions Summary) 

Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

ppm Ibs/hr 

1 

2 

3 

600.39 

593.00 

547.71 

385.42 

276.69 

258.90 

Average = 580.37 306.94 

Table 2.2.2 

(S02 Emissions Summary) 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

ppm Ibs/hr 

1 

2 

3 

211.33 

137.62 

181.92 

78.096 

54.205 

73.744 

Average = 176.96 68.682 

-7- /.3 
Tabie 2.2.3 

(S02Emissions Summary) 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

ppm Ibs/hr . 

1 

2 

3 1 35.56 

25.52 

29.36 

13.156 

10.290 

12.018 

Average 30.15 11.821 

The average measured S0 2 emission concentration for the Tunnel 

Kiln No. 4 Outlet was 11.821 Ibs/hr, which is 23.18% of the UDEQ 

permitted allowable ceiling of 51.0 Ibs/hr. 

2.3 NO), Emissions (EPA 7E) 

The emissions data accumulated for NO X emissions during the 

December 7, 1994 Compliance Emissions Testing is summarized 

in Table 2.3.1 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet, Table 2.3.2 for the 

Tunnel Ki(n No. 4 Inlet and Table 2.3.3 for the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 

Outlet. 

Table 2.3.1 

(NOX Emissions Summary) 

Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

ppm I b s/ h r 

1 

2 

3 

31.30 

32.44 

39.84 

14.75 

15.36 

19.08 

Average = 34.53 76.40 
Table 2.3.2 

(NOX Emissions Summary) 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

ppm I bs/h r 

1 

2 

3 

13.32 

10.52 

8.45 

3.318 

2.851 

2.402 

Average = 10.76 2.857 

Tabie 2.3.3 

(NOX Emissions Summary) 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

ppm 1 b s/ h r 

1 

2 

3 

12.07 

10.52 

8.45 

3.069 

2.851 

2.402 

Average = 10.35 2.774 

The average measured NO Xemission concentration for the Tunnel 

Kiln No. 4 Outlet was 2.77 Ibs/hr, which is 106.7% of the UDEQ 

permitted allowable ceiling of 2.6 Ibs/hr. 

9 ~~ 
2.4 Visible Emission Opacity (VE) 

VEO's were taken simultaneously with each of the EPA Method 

201 A runs on the Primary Crusher & Line 3& 4 Baghouses and 

each of the EPA Method 6C & 7E runs on the Tunnel Kilns 3& 4. 

Averages for the three (3) runs are listed in the following tables 

for each source: 

Table 2.4.1 - Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet 

Tabie 2.4.2 - Primary Crusher Baghouse 

Table 2.4.3 - Line 3 Baghouse 

Table 2.4.4 - Line 4 Baghouse 

Table 2.4.1 

(Visible Emissions Opacity Summary) 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet 

Test Number %VEO 

1 4.58 

2 5.83 

3 1.88 

Average = 4.10% 

The average VEO reading of 4.10% for this source was well below 

the allowable UDEO ceiling level of < 20%. 
... 

Table 2.4.2 

(Visible Emissions Opacity Summary) 

Primary Crusher Baghouse 

Test Number %VEO 

1 0.00 

2 0.00 

3 0.00 

Average = 0.00% 

The average VEO reading of 0.00% for this source was well below 

the allowable UDEQ ceiling level of 5 10%. 

Table 2.4.3 

(Visible Emissions Opacity Summary) 

Line 3 Baqhouse 

Test Number %VEO 

1 0.00 

2 0.00 

3 0.00 

Average = 0.00% 

The average VEO reading of 0.00% for this source was well below 

the allowable UDEQ ceiling level of <_ 10%. 

-11- i'l 
Table 2.4.4 

(Visible Emissions Opacity Summary) 

Line 4 Baghouse 

Test Number %VEO 

1 0.00 

2 0.00 

3 0.00 

Average = 0.00% 

The average VEO reading of 0.00% for this source was well below 

the allowable UDEO ceiling level of 5 10%. 

2.5 HF Emissions (EPA 1313) 

The emissions data accumulated for HF emissions during the 

December 5, 1994 Compliance Emissions Testing on the Tunnel 

Kiln No. 4 Outlet is summarized in Table 2.5.1. 

Table 2.5.1 

(HF Emissions Summary) 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet 

Test 

Run 

Emissions Rates 

Ibs/hr gr/dscf 

1 

2 

3 

2.4571 

.1.8806 

2.0247 

0.0077 

0.0056 

0.0058 

Average 2.1208 0.0064 

-17- 

Ir 
The average measured HF emission concentration for the Tunnel 

Kiln No. 4 Outlet was 2.1208 Ibs/hr, which is 37.21 % of the UDEO 

permitted allowable ceiling of 5.7 Ibs/hr. 

3.0 Source Operations 

3.1General Plant Operations 

The manufacture of brick and related products such as clay pipe, 

pottery and some types of refractory brick involves the mining, 

grinding, screening and blending of the raw materials, and the 

forming, cutting or shaping, drying or curing, and firing of the 

final product. 

Surface clays and shales are mined in open pits. Most fine clays 

are found underground. After mining, the material is crushed to 

remove stones and is stirred before it passes onto screens for 

segregation by particle size. 

To start the forming process, clay is mixed with water, usually in 

a pug mill. The three principal processes for forming brick are 

stiff mud, soft mud and dry press. In the stiff mud process, 

sufficient water is added to give the clay plasticity, and bricks 

are formed by forcing the clay through a die. Wire is used in 

separating bricks. All structural tile and most and most brick are 

formed by this process. The soft mud process is usually used 

with clay too wet for the stiff mud process. The clay is mixed 

with water to a moisture content of 20 to 30 percent, and the 

bricks are formed in molds. In the dry press process, clay is 

mixed with a small amount of water and formed in steel molds by 

applying pressure of 500 to 1500 pounds per square inch. 

Wet clay units that have been formed are almost completely dried 

before firing, usually with waste heat from kiins. Many types of 

kilns are used for firing brick, but the most common are the 

downdraft periodic kiln and the tunnel kiln. The periodic kiln is a 

permanent brick structure with a number of fireholes where fuel 

enters the furnace. Hot gases from the fuel are drawn up over the 

bricks, down through then by underground flues, and out of the 

oven to the chimney. Although lower heat recovery makes this 

-13- ) q 
i 

type less efficient than the tunnel kiln, the uniform temperature 

distribution leads to a good quality product. 

Production Data during the testing period was given to AET by 

Interstate Brick Company and is attached as Appendix "C". 

4.0 Sampling and Analysis Procedures 

4.1Emissions Testing 

A. EPA Method 1; sample and velocity traverses for stationary 

sources. 

Figure 4.1.1 is a diagram of the Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet Stack. 

This reference method requires the tester, due to stack 

geometry, to sample for particulate and velocity at twenty 

(20) separate locations in the stack, five (5) per traverse, in 

four (4) separate ports. The location of these points relative 

to the stack are given in Table 4.1.2. 

Figure 4.1.3 is a diagram of the Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet Stack. 

This reference method requires the tester, due to stack 

geometry, to sample for particulate and velocity at twentyfive (25) separate locations in the stack, five (5) per traverse, 

in five (5) separate ports. The location of these points relative 

to the stack are given in Table 4.1.4. 

Figure 4.1.5 is a diagram of the Primary Crusher Baghouse 

Stack. The reference methods require the tester, due to the 

stack geometry, to sample for. particulate and velocity at ' 

twelve (12) separate locations in the stack, six (6) per 

traverse, on diameter lines 90 0apart from one another. The 

location of these points relative to the stack are given in Table 

4.1.6. 

Figure 4.1.7 is a diagram of the Line 3 Baghouse Stack. The 

reference methods require the tester, due to the stack 

geometry, to sample for particulate and velocity at twelve 

(12) separate locations in the stack, six (6) per traverse, on 

diameter lines 90 10apart from one another. The location of 

these points relative to the stack are given in Table 4.1.8. 

-14- cql 
Interstate Brick Company 

No. 3 Kiln Inlet 

Figure 4.1.1 

~ 

4- 

A= 251' = 5.23 Diameters B= 120" = 2.5 Diameters 

_1 q_ A) 
5 10 15 20 

. . . . 

4 9 14 19 

■ . ■ . 

3 8 13 18 

. . . . 

2 7 12 17 

. . . . 

1 6 11 16 

. . . ■ 

48" 

Interstate Bricic Company 

No. 3 Kiln Inlet 

Tabte 4.1.2 

48" 

u k6 k6 k6 

Sample Ports are 15" Long 

Sample Point Distance from outside of Port 

1,6,11,16 19.8" = 19 3a4" 

2, 7, 12, 17 29.4" = 29 3/8" 

3, 8, 13, 18 39.0" = 39" 

4, 9, 14, 19 48.6" = 48 5I8" 

5, 10, 15, 20 58.2" = 58 1 !4" 

_ , G .~ 
120' 

p = 523" = 4.35 D 

6=366"=3.04D' 

Interstate Brick Company 

Mo. 4 Kiln Outlet 

F igure 4.1.3 

120.5" 

- 1 rh 
5 10 15 20 25 

. . • . . 

4 9 14 19 24 

■ ■ . ■ ■ 

3 8 13 18 23 

■ • • ■ • 

2 7 12 17 22 

• ■ • '■ • 

1 6 11 16 21 

. . . . . 

120" 

Interstate Brick Company 

No. 4 Kiln Outlet 

Table 4.1.4 

120.5" 

16 16 k6 ~6 16 

Sample Ports are 15.75" Long 

Sample Poi nt Distance from outside of Port 

1,6,11,16&21 27.75" = 27 3l4" 

2, 7, 12, 17 & 22 51.75" = 51 3l4" 

3, 8, 13, 18 & 23 75.75" = 75 3/4" 

4,9, 14, 19&24 99.75" = 99 3I4" 

5, 10, 15, 20 & 25 123.75" = 123 3l4" 

~ a~ 
Interstate Brick Company 

Primary Crusher Baghouse 

F.i gure 4.1.5 

12.0" 

B = 24" = 2.0 Diametere 

.T 

A=96"=8.ODiametero 

, n 1 ~ 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drfve 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TRAVERSE POINT CALCULATIONS 

• _ - = =. •..•-. 

. ~ . ~ . .. -,•. -...-. . .= =-- ~ •• _ 

, •_ • ,c . . ti ._ . 

... • _. - ~ 

... • ,. _ ~ 

. . 0 . 785 t . _ t_,. 

Traverse Percent of Stacfc I.D. Product of Distance Traverse Point 

Point Stadc I.D. inches col. 2&3 Y Location from 

Number (to 1/8 in) outside of ports 

(sum of columns 

4 & 5) 

1& 7 4.4 12 0.528 3.75 4.278 = 4 1/4" 

2&. 8 14.6 12 1.752 3.75 5.502 = 5 1/2" 

3& 9 29.6 12 3.552 3.75 7.302 = 7 1/4" 

4& 10 70.4 12 8.448 3.75 12.198 = 12 114" 

5& 11 85.4 12 10.248 3.75 13.990 a 14.0" 

6& 12 95.6 12 11.472 3.75 15.222 = 15 1/4" 

-20- (::~ 6 
Interstate Brick Company 

Li ne 3 Baghouse 

Figure 4.1.7 

18.?5" 

B = 36" = 1.92 Diameters 

A= 1 13" = 6.03 Diameters 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Bin:h Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

i=• - 

TRAVERSE POINT CALCULATIONS 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

❑~r•tz•Tr,r-~~~ii • • ,~[:[~ 

•. , • -.. - ~ 

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

1&7 

2&8 

3&9 

4 & 10 

5&11 

6 & 12 

Percent of Stack I.D. Product of Distance 

Stadc I.D. inches col. 2 &3 Y 

(to 1/8 in) 

4.4 18.75 0.825 3.75 

14.6 18.75 2.7375 3.75 

29.6 18.75 5.55 3.75 

70.4 18.75 13.2 3.75 

85.4 18.75 16.0125 3.75 

95.6 18.75 17.925 3.75 

Traverse Point 

Location from 

outside of ports 

(sum of columns 

4 & 5) 

4.575 = 4 5/8" 

6.488 a 6 1 /2" 

9.3=91/4' 

16.95 = 17' 

19.763 = 19 3/4' 

21.675 = 21 5/8' 

' ,, 
Figure 4.1.9 is a diagram of Line 4 Baghouse Stack. The 

reference methods require the tester, due to the stack 

geometry, to sample for particulate and velocity at twelve 

(12) separate locations in the stack, six (6) per traverse, on 

diameter lines 90 11 apart from one another. The location of 

these points relative to the stack are given in Table 4.1.10. 

B. EPA Method 3; for gas analysis of carbon dioxide, oxygen, 

excess air, and dry molecular weight. 

This reference method requires that a gas sample be extracted 

from the stack for analysis concurrently with each of the runs. 

The integrated gas sample is then analyzed via an orsat for 

carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and oxygen. The nitrogen value 

is obtained by difference. 

Results from these determinations are included in Appendix "D" 

with the ' field and laboratory data forms for each individual 

so u rce. 

C. EPA Method 2, 5, 201 A& 202 Combined; for the determination 

of velocity, particulate matter, PM 1 oemissions/back-half 

condensibles and volumetric flow rate from stationary 

sources. 

To evaluate compliance with the PM 1 olimitation specified in 

the "Approval Order", AET had to test using methodology 

consistent with the above referenced methods. Data from the 

three (3) separate runs, which constitute a single compliance 

test, are summarized in the following tables for each source: 

Table 4.1.11 Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet 

Table 4.1.12 Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet & Outlet 

Table 4.1.13 Primary Crusher Baghouse 

Table 4.1.14 Line 3 Baghouse 

Table 4.1.15 Line 4 Baghouse 

The original laboratory and field data accumulated at the test 

site are presented in Appendix "D". Orsat and laboratory 

weight forms are hand written on site as the data is generated. 

_7'Z_ 2 
Interstate Brick Company 

Li ne 4 Baghouse 

Fi gure 4_ 1.9 

18.?5" 

B = 14" = 0.75 Diameters 

A = 100" = 5.33 Diameters 

3d 

~ . 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

Table 4.1.10 

TRAVERSE POINT CALCUL.ATIONS 

._~ _ 

. - 

- _~iL" ~:= •u•,u 

.~.. . ._ _. ~•~ .- -. ~ . _ 

... . -.. 

- ~ 

.: 

... . . ~ . 

. : ~ . , ~-,• 

Traverse Pen:ent of Stack I.D. Product of Distance Traverse Point 

Point Stadc I.D. inches col. 2&3 Y Location from 

Number (to 1/8 in) outside of ports 

(sum of columns 

4 & 5) 

1& 7 4.4 18.75 0.825 4 4.825 = 4 7/8" 

2& 8 14.6 18.75 2.7375 4 6.738 = 6 9/4" 

3& 9 29.6 18.75 5.55 4 9.55 = 9 1/2" 

4& 10 70.4 18.75 13.2 4 17.20 = 17 1/4" 

5& 11 85.4 18.75 16.0125 4 20.013 = 20.0 ' 

6& 12 95.6 18.75 17.925 4 21.925 = 21 7/8" 

—25— e3 I 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.11 

(FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY) 

Plant: Interstate Brick Comoanv 

Source: Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet 

EPA Method 4 

Units 

Date: 126/94 

Svmbol Descriotion Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 

Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 30.289 30.289 30.289 

sampled @ meter Iso 27.775 27.775 27.775 

conditions 

Pb Barometric Pres 'Hg abs 25.42 25.42 25.42 

OH Average Pres 'H20 1.2 1.2 1.2 

drop across the 

orifice meter 

Tm Average gas °R 539.45 539.45 539.45 

meter temp °F 79.45 79.45 79.45 

r Meter Coefficient 0.917 0.917 0.917 

Vw Total H20 ml 49.1 49.1 49.1 

collected, impingers 

& silica gel 

CO2 % 3.4 3.4 3.4 

02 % 14.8 14.8 14.8 

N2+C0 % 81.8 81.8 81.8 

Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.502 0.502 0.502 

Ts Stack Temp °R 881.5 882.5 884.5 

°F 421.5 422.5 424.5 

Sqr rt AP Velocity head 'H20 1.8165 1.8369 1.8645 

of stack gas 

Cp Pitot Tube 0.8429 0.8429 0.8429 

Coefricient 

Ps Static Pres 'H20 -0.18 -0.18 -0.18 

Pabs Absolute Pres 'Hg 25.41 25.41 25.41 

As Area stack Ft2 15.999 15.999 15.999 

Stack in inches 54.16 54.16 54.16 

Tt Net time min. 40 40 40 

of test 

-26- ~" 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.12 

(FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY) 

Plant: Interstate Brick ComRanv 

Source: Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet & Outlet 

Iyoe: EPA Method 5/202 & 138 

Test #2 

Date: 12/5194 

Symbol Descriotion Units Test #1 Test #3 

Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 48.187 52.536 54.383 

sampled @ meter Iso 44.187 48.176 49.869 

conditions 

Pb Barometric Pre: "Hg abs 25.3 25.2 25.22 

AH Average Pres "H20 0.9141 0.9844 1.0423 

drop across the 

orifice meter 

Tm Average gas °R 540.48 543.2 550.3 

meter temp °F 80.48 83.2 90.3 

Yi Meter Coeffcient 0.917 0.917 0.917 

Vw Total H20 ml 128.5 123.8 121.4 

collected, impingers 

& silica gel 

CO2 % 2.23 2.47 2.47 

02 % 16.9 16.8 16.7 

N2 + CO % 80.87 80.73 80.83 

Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.501 0.501 0.501 

Ts Stadc Temp °R 585.16 583.92 581.2 

°F 125.16 123.92 121.2 

Sqr rt AP Velocity head "H20 0.1441 0.1502 0.1534 

of stadc gas 

Cp Pitot Tube 0.8401 0.8401 0.8401 

Coefficient 

Ps Static Pres "H20 0.01 0.01 0.01 

Pabs Absoiute Pres 'Hg 25.30 25.20 25.22 

As Area stack Ft2 100.420 100.420 100.420 

Stack in inches 135.69 135.69 135.69 

Tt Net time min. 75 75 75 

of test 

Mgp Particulate Mg Total 44.4 66 86.2 

HF Mg Total 18.1 14.2 15.2 

-27- ~3~ 
AMEFiICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.13 

Plant: Interstate 

Source: Primarv 

I,yoe: EPA Method 

(FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY) 

Brick Comganv 

Crusher Bagbouse 

201 A- PM10 Emissiorts 

Date: 1216/94 

Sylnbol 

Vm 

Descriotion 

Volume dry gas 

Units 

Ft3 

Test #1 

28.79 

Test #2 

28.65 

Test #3 

28.98 

sampled @ meter Iso 28.732 28.593 28.922 

conditions 

Pb Barometric Prea "Hg abs 25.23 25.23 25.23 

AH Average Pres "H20 0.557 0.557 0.557 

drop acnoss the 

orifice meter 

Tm Average gas °R 544.67 556.54 557.29 

meter temp °F 84.67 96.54 97.29 

Yi Meter Coefficient 0.998 0.998 0.998 

Vw Total H20 mi 22 19.1 15.7 

collected, impingers 

& silica gel 

CO2 % 0.1 0.1 0.1 

02 % 20.8 20.8 20.8 

N2 + CO % 79.1 79.1 79.1 

Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.135 0.135 0.135 

Ts Stacic Temp °R 505.08 509.83 511.33 

°F 45.08 49.83 51.33 

Sqr rt AP Velocity head "H20 0.865 0.8622 0.8622 

of stadc gas 

, Cp Pitot Tube 0.8394 0.8394 0.8394 

Coefficient 

Ps Stadc Pres "H20 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 

Pabs Absolute Pres "Hg 25.12 25.12 25.12 

As Area stack Ft2 0.785 0.785 0.785 

Stack in inches 12 12 12 

Tt Net time min. 60 59.25 60 

of test 

Mgp Mg Total 5 4.7 5.3 

_,Q_ ,0 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.14 

P1ant: Interstate 

(FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY) 

Brick Comoanv 

Baghouse 

201A - PM10 Emissions 

Source: Line 3 

jyoe: EPA Method 

Date: 1215/94 

Symbol Descril2tion Units Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 

Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 22.008 22.586 22.169 

sampled @ meter Iso 23.879 24.506 24.053 

conditions 

Pb Barometric Pre: 'Hg abs 25.32 25.3 25.26 

aFl Average Pres 'H20 0.5661 0.5615 0.5505 

drop across the 

orifice meter 

Tm Average gas °R 519.54 525.92 522.04 

meter temp °F 59.54 65.92 62.04 

Yi Meter Coefficient 1.085 1.085 1.085 

Vw Total H20 ml 8.9 6.5 6.5 

collected, impingers 

& silica gel 

CO2 % 0.2 0.2 o.2 

02 % 20.5 20.5 20.5 

N2 + CO % 79.3 79.3 79.3 

Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.183 0.183 0.183 

Ts Stack Temp °R 519.83 515.42 510.25 

°F 59.83 55.42 50.25 

Sqr rt AP Velocity head 'H20 0.5497 0.5602 0.5359 

of stadc gas 

Cp Pitot Tube 0.8414 0.8414 0.8414 

Coefficient 

Ps Static Pres 'H20 -9 -9 -9 

Pabs Absolute Pnes 'Hg 24.66 24.64 24.60 

As Area stack Ft2 1.917 1.917 1.917 

Stack in inches 18.75 18.75 18.75 

Tt Net time min. 54.75 56 53.5 

of test 

Mgp Mg Total 5.2 3.5 2.7 

-29- 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.15 

(F1ELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY) 

.. ■ 

. ~~_ 

,_ _•.• - 

•._ _ „_, .. • -, ~ • •• •. 

Symbol Description Units Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 

Vm Volume dry gas Ft3 28.25 26.81 27.36 

sampled @ meter Iso 28.194 26.756 27.305 

conditions 

Pb Barometric Pres "Hg abs 25.31 25.31 25.31 

aH Average Pres 01420 0.56 0.56 0.56 

drop across the 

orifice meter 

Tm Average gas °R 539.54 547.67 552.88 

meter temp °F 79.54 87.67 92.88 

Yi Meter Coefficient 0.998 0.998 0.998 

Vw Total H20 ml 30.5 15.8 23.4 

collected, impingers 

& silica gel 

CO2 % 0.1 0.1 0.1 

02 % 20.8 20.8 20.8 

N2 + CO % 79.1 79.1 79.1 

Rn Nozzle Dia. in. 0.216 0.216 0.216 

Ts Stacic Temp °R 503.5 502.5 501.92 

°F 43.5 42.5 41.92 

Sqr rt AP Velocity head "H20 0.2872 0.2626 0.2681 

of stacic gas 

Cp Pitot Tube 0.8394 0.8394 0.8394 

Coefficient 

Ps Static Pres "H20 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 

Pabs Absoiute Pres "Hg 25.31 25.31 25.31 

As Area stacic Ft2 1.917 1.917 1.917 

Stacic in inches 18.75 18.75 18.75 

Tt Net time min. 59.75 57.25 57.25 

of test 

Mgp Mg Total 9 4.1 5.9 

-';n - ,3 ~2 
Particulate (PM 10 ) and velocity measurements, required in the 

applicable reference methods, are generated in the field by 

computer. These forms are also included in Appendix "D" for 

each of the three (3) runs that comprise a compliance test. 

Compliance criteria is calculated using computer and handwritten field forms and are summarized in the following 

tables for each source: 

Table 4.1.16 

Table 4.1.17 

Table 4.1.18 

Table 4.1.19 

Table 4.1.20 

Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet & Outlet 

Primary Crusher Baghouse 

Line 3 Baghouse 

Line 4 Baghouse 

A copy of the example calculations are attached as Appendix 

"E" 

Figure 4.1.21 is a schematic of the samp(e train used to obtain 

the field data. A stainless steel probe liner was used for the 

testing. The glass fiber filters used in the train are 99.95% 

efficient on 0.3 micron particles and have no organic binders 

(Andersen P-3710). These filters are tared before use and 

after the test to determine particulate loading. Filter weights 

and particulate in the acetone washes of the glassware and 

probe ahead of the filter constitute the total particulate catch. 

The probe and filter are kept at 248°F ± 25 0during sampling. 

Moisture in the stack gases is coliected by keeping the 

impingers in the sample train below 68°F with an ice bath. The 

"back-half" of the moisture sampling train contained the 

following impingers: 

Impinger 

Number Contents Amount Parameter Collected 

1 Deionized Water 100 ml Moisture 

2 Deionized Water 100 ml Moisture 

3 Empty - - - - - - - Moisture 

4 Silica Gel @200 g Moisture 

Prior to doing the EPA Method 5 and 201 A/202 tests, AET ran a 

pretest cyclonic flow determination in the exhaust stacks per 

-31- 3? 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.16 

(CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA) 

. .= ~ _ A A_ 

~ •_= u- ~ . . 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 

Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.5794 0.5794 0.5794 

sampled @ standani dscf 23.177 23.177 23.177 

Conditions 

Vw gas Volume water scf 2.311 2.311 2.311 

vapor coitected @ 

standard conditions 

Bws Proportion by 0.091 0.091 0.091 

volume of water 

vapor in gas stream 

dimensionless 

Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 29.136 29.136 29.136 

weight 

Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.126 28.126 28.126 

weight 

Vs Stacic gas ft/sec 145.382 147.093 149.4789 

velocity 

as Volumetric flow ft3/hr 3.8727 3.9139 3.9684 

rate dry basis x E+06 x E+06 x E+06 

standard conditions 

-32- 

"

~g, 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.17 

(CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA) 

• _ .._ .. • ._ • _ .. _ 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 

Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.4867 0.5259 0.5378 

sampled @ standard dscf 36.5016 39.4402 40.3321 

Conditions 

Vw gas Volume water scf 6.0485 5.8273 5.7143 

vapor collected @ 

standard conditions 

Bws Proportion by 0.1421 0.1287 0.1241 

volume of water 

vapor in gas stream 

dimensionless 

Md Dry molecular Ib/lb mo(e 29.0328 29.0672 29.0632 

weight 

Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 27.4645 27.6425 27.6903 

weight 

Vs Stack gas ft/sec 9.4985 9.8765 10.0498 

velocity 

Qs Volumetric flow ft3/hr 2.2476 2.3693 2.4369 

rate dry basis x E+06 x E+06 x E+06 

standard conditions 

Iso Isokinetic % 95.527 97.9395 97.3883 

variation 

-33- 1? 91 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.18 

(CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA) 

. .. ~ _ -••• _ 

.__ „_ •.. • -,~ • ~~ •. 

94 

Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.3913 0.3858 0.3850 

sampled @ standard dscf 23.48 22.86 23.1 

Conditions 

Vw gas . Volume water scf 1.04 0.9 0.74 

vapor collected @ 

standard canditions 

Bws Proportion by 0.04 0.04 0.03 

volume of water 

vapor in gas stream 

dimensionless 

Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.848 28.848 28.848 

weight 

Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.631 28.631 28.631 

weight 

Vs Stack gas ft/sec 52.24 52.27 52.28 

velocity 

as Volumetric flow ft3/hr 1.2409 1.2357 1.2411 

rate dry basis x E+05 x E+05 x E+05 

standard conditions 

Iso Isokinetic % 150.18 148.7 147.72 

variation 

D50 Sampling cut rate 9.613 9.7539 9.8353 

~{D 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.19 

(CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA) 

•_= _ „- •.. • -„ • •• •. 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 

Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.3750 0.3714 0.3837 

sampled @ standard dscf 20.53 20.8 20.53 

Conditions 

Vw gas Volume water scf 0.42 0.31 0.31 

vapor collected @ 

standard conditions 

Bws Proportion by 0.02 0.01 0.01 

volume of water 

vapor in gas stream 

dimensionless 

Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.852 28.852 28.852 

weight 

Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.635 28.635 28.635 

weight 

Vs Stack gas ft/sec 33.92 34.41 32.78 

velocity 

Qs Volumetric flow ft3/hr 1.921 1.9745 1.8964 

rate dry basis x E+05 x E+05 x E+05 

standard conditions 

Iso Isokinetic % 12118 118.69 127.71 

variation 

D50 Sampling cut rate 10.0326 10.1464 9.8995 

-35- ~` 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

TABLE 4.1.20 

(CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CFtITERIA) 

- _.. Mrs _ 

•~- _ u: ~.. ~ - 

~ ~ ~~ . •. 

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION UNITS Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 

Vm std Volume dry gas dscfm 0.3905 0.3810 0.3852 

sampled @ standard dscf 23.33 21.81 2205 

Conditions 

Vw gas Volume water scf 1.44 0.74 1.1 

vapor collected @ 

standard conditions 

Bws Proportion by 0.06 0.03 0.05 

volume of water 

vapor in gas stream 

dimensionless 

Md Dry molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.848 28.848 28.848 

weight 

Ms Wet molecular Ib/Ib mole 28.631 28.631 28.631 

weight 

Vs Stack gas fUsec 17.31 15.73 16.09 

velocity 

Qs Volumetric flow ft3/hr 9.9819 9.3346 9.4149 

rate dry basis x E+04 x E+04 x E+04 

standard conditions 

(so Isokinetic % 177.17 184.91 185.32 

variation 

D50 Sampling cut rate 9.5171 9.9198 9.7058 

— z r 4 
OC 

W 

F 

W 

~ O 

S 

OL W N _ 

T 

N 

r 

~ 

~ 

L 

~ 

~ 

LL. 

C 

~ i 

H 

m 

E 

aa 

N 

Q 

T 

~ 

N 

v 

~ 

Z 

~ 

~ 

~ 

a 

a 

W 

d 

~ 

x 

t' 

~ 

` 

~ 

OL W J 0 _ ~ W J W W ~ d. 

_ ~ 

~ 

O 

~ 

~ 

m 

W } ~ 

~~ O 

N~ 

-37- 
Field VEO forms and the readers current certification cards are 

included as Appendix "I". 

F. EPA Method 13B for the determination of hydrofluoric acid (HF) 

emissions from stationary sources as specified in Federal and 

State regulations. 

Particulate and gaseous hydrofluoric acid are extracted from 

the stack isokinetically using a modified EPA Method 5 sample 

train. Total fluoride is determined on the filter, probe and 

prefilter glassware and in the back-half impinger water using 

a specific ion electrode. 

5.0 Quality Control/Quality Assurance 

5.1 Comoliance Testing 

Specific items used in the EPA approved sample trains require 

pretest and post-test calibrations. The frequency of the 

calibrations and guidelines for procedural items are delineated in 

the EPA's "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution 

Measurement Systems". 

For EPA Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 13B 201 A/202 inclusive the quality 

assurance guidelines are intended to insure that the PM 1 a , S02 , 

NOXand HF emissions are quantified in a manner consistent with 

the most stringent sampling criteria possible. AET testing 

personnel are thoroughly trained in all aspects of the EPA 

required QA/QC guidelines. The crew supervisor has certified at 

the front of this report that the test crew adhered to those 

guidelines in the regulations applicable to the compliance testing 

at Interstate Brick Company's West Jordan, Facility. There were 

no deviations from prescribed methodology reported by the 

supervisor. 

Calibrations for the sample nozzle, pitot tube, thermocouples, 

orifice, ' filter balance and dry gas meter used to extract the 

sample at an isokinetic rate of 100% ± 10.0% or a D50rate of 10.0 

± 1.0 are attached as Appendix "J". 

-40- ~~ 
The main quality criteria that AET is required to fulfill for the 

P M 1 a emissions testing is as follows: 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet 

1. Isokinetic Sampling Rate = 100 ± 10.0% 

AET Run Number Sampling Rate 

1 95.5270 

2 97.9395 

3 97.3883 

Average = 96.9516 

2. Samplirng Volume => 31.8 DSCF 

AET Run Number Sample Volume (DSCF) 

1 36.5016 

2. 39.4402 

3 40.3321 

Average = 38.7580 

AII of the - compliance test quality assurance criteria was 

achieved for this set of tests. 

Primarv Crusher Bagh__ouse 

1. D50 Cut Rate = 10.0 t 1.0% 

AET Run Number Sampling Rate 

1 9.6130 

2 9.7539 

3 9.8353 

Average = 9.7341 

-~~- ~~ 
2. Filter Temperature = 248 t 25 (°F) 

AET Run Number Filter Temperature (°F) 

1 245.75° 

2 246.75° 

3 248.83° 

Average = 247.11 ° F 

AII of the compliance test quality assurance criteria was 

achieved for this set of tests. 

1. D50Cut Rate = 10.0 ± 1.0% 

AET Run Number 

1 

2 

3 

Average = 

Sampling Rate 

10.0326 

10.1464 

9.8995 

10.0262 

2. Filter' Temperature = 248 ± 25 (°F) 

AET Run Number Filter Temperature (°F) 

1 249.58° 

2 251.00° 

3 249.17° 

Average = 249.92° F 

AII of the compliance test quality assurance criteria was 

achieved for this set of tests. 

-42- db 
Line 4 Baqhouse 

1. D50 Cut Rate = 10.0 ± 1.0% 

AET Run Number Sampling Rate 

1 9.5171 

2 9.9198 

3 9.7058 

Average = 9.7142 

2. Filter Temperature = 248 ± 25 (°F) 

AET Run Number Filter Temperature (°F) 

1 265.25° 

2 252.92° 

3 247.92° 

Average = 255.36° F 

AII of the compliance test quality assurance criteria was 

achieved for this set of tests. 

The CEM sample train was also leak checked prior to testing the 

Enterprise Engines. The standards used for these tests conformed 

to EPA "Protocol 1" quality. Those certifications are included in 

Appendix "J". 

The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Method 7E requires 

that the following items are met: 

-43- 

217 
Tunnel Kiln No. 3 Inlet 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide in 

nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 300 

PPm: 

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NOx). 

AET had a zero gas of purified N2that was < 0.1 ppm NOx. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide 

concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 159.9 ppm, which was 

in the acceptable range. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide 

concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's high-level calibration gas was 259.6 which was in 

the acceptable range. 

The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in 

Appendix "J". 

2. Measurement System Performance Specifications 

During the NOx tests AET's measurement system is required to 

meet the following criteria: 

a. Zero drift < to 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met for these tests. 

b. Calibration drift <_ 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met for these tests. 

c. Calibration bias error has to be 5 5.0% of the calibration 

gas value. 
AET met this condition for the tests. These results are 

included in Appendix "J". 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Inlet 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide in 

nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 300 

PPm: 

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NOx). 

AET had a zero gas of purified N2that was < 0.1 ppm NOx. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide 

concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 159.9 ppm, which was 

in the acceptable range. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide 

concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's high-level calibration gas was 259.6 which was in 

the acceptable range. 

The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in 

Appendix "J". 

2. Measurement System Performance Specifications 

During the NOx tests AETs measurement system is required to 

meet the following criteria: 

a. Zero drift <_ to 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met for these tests. 

-45- ~~ 
b. Calibration drift <_ 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met for these tests. 

c. Calibration bias error has to be 5 5.0% of the calibration 

gas value. 

AET met this condition for the tests. These results are 

included in Appendix "J". 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlel 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of nitrogen oxide in 

nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 300 

Ppm: 

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm NOx). 

AET had a zero gas of purified N2that was < 0.1 ppm NOx. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a nitrogen oxide 

concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 159.9 ppm, which was 

in the -acceptable range. 

c. High-level calibration gas with - a nitrogen oxide 

concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's high-level calibration gas was 259.6 which was in 

the acceptable range. 

The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in 

Appendix "J". 

2. Measurement System Performance Specifications 

During the NOx tests AETs measurement system is required to 

meet the following criteria: 

-46- 

.~~ 
a. Zero drift 5 to 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met for these tests. 

b. Calibration drift 5 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met for these tests. 

c. Calibration bias error has to be 5 5.0% of the calibration 

gas value. 

AET met this condition for the tests. These results are 

included in Appendix "J". 

The main quality assurance criteria for EPA Method 6C requires 

that the following items are met: 

Tunnel Kiln No. 3 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide in 

nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 

1000 ppm: 

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). 

AET had a zero gas of purified N2 that was < 0.1 ppm S02. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide 

concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 514.6 ppm, which was 

in the acceptable range. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide 

concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's high-level calibration gas was 901.6 which was in 

the acceptable range. 

-47- 

151 
The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in 

Appendix "J". 

2. Measurement System Performance Specifications 

During the S02 tests AET's measurement system is required to 

meet the following criteria: 

a. Zero drift 5 to 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met for these tests. 

b. Calibration drift 5 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met for these tests. 

c. Calibration bias error has to be s 5.0% of the calibration 

gas value. 

AET met this condition for the tests. These results are 

included in Appendix "J". 

Tunnel Kiln. No. 4 Inlet 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide in 

nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 300 

PPm: 

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). 

AET had a zero gas of purified N2that was < 0.1 ppm S02. 

b. Mid-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide 

concentration equivalent to .40 to 60 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 163.5 ppm, which was 

in the acceptable range. 

-48- ~~ 
c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide 

concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's high-level calibration gas was 260.7 which was in 

the acceptable range. 

The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in 

Appendix "J". 

2. Measurement System Performance Specifications 

During the S02 tests AET's measurement system is required to 

meet the following criteria: 

a. Zero drift <_ to 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met for these tests. 

b. Calibration drift. _< 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met fo r these tests. 

c. Calibration bias error has to be <_ 5.0% of the calibration 

gas value. 

AET met - this condition for the tests. These results are 

included in Appendix "J". 

Tunnel Kiln No. 4 Outlet 

1. EPA Protocol 1 gas standards consisting of sulfur dioxide in 

nitrogen in the following ranges for the span value of 0 to 300 

PPm: 

a. Zero gas (< 0.1 ppm S02). 

AET had a zero gas of purified N2that was < 0.1 ppm S02. 

-49- 

c~~ 
b. Mid-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide 

concentration equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's mid-level calibration gas was 163.5 ppm, which was 

in the acceptable range. 

c. High-level calibration gas with a sulfur dioxide 

concentration equivalent to 80 to 100 percent of the span 

value. 

AET's high-level calibration gas was 260.7 which was in 

the acceptabfe range. 

The calibration gas certificates of analysis are included in 

Appendix "J". 

2. Measurement System Performance Specifications 

During the S02 tests AETs measurement system is required to 

meet the following criteria: 

a Zero drift <_ to 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met for these tests. 

b. Calibration drift _< 3.0% of the span value. 

It was met for these tests. 

c. Calibration bias error has to be 5 5.0% of the calibration 

gas value. 

AET met this condition for the tests. These results are 

included in Appendix "J". 

,o y ~ 
Appendix "A" 

(Approval Order) 

agrnrsican Envfxon,nrnEaf gestuzg eom#any ffnc. 

cRcno, dVevada gl'rocrslx, c4:i.zona csaa -fju ei.Ey, 2Lta{z ~

702-786-8113 6o2- 253-3354 80t- 266- 7m 
STATE OF UTAH 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Division of Air Quality 

INTENT TO APPROVE TU XNEL KILN #4 

Prepared By: Nando Meli, Engineer 

1► II y oleo off-MU u : • I 51IN103 1 0.1 m C 

DAQE-947-94 

Date: October 27, 1994 

Source 

INTERSTATE BRICK COMPANY 

Russell A. Roberts 

Executive Secretary 

Utah Air Quality Board 

~~ 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 2 

Abstract 

Interstate Brick is required by the PM„ SIP to reduce S01emissions to meet Reasonable Available 

Control Technology (RACT). The Apprnval Order contains new emissfon lhnitations which have been 

determined to meet RACT. Interstate Brick has also proposed an increase in, fluoride emissfons for Kiln 

#4, the only kiln which had a fluoride emission limit. Modeling of overall fluoride emissions has been 

performed which demonstrates compliance with the threshold limit values set for , fluoride. 

Corresponding 'emission limits for fluoride from each kiln are contained in the Approval Order. 

Prevlously unidentyEed emissions from existfng baghouses, whfch have been determined to meet Best 

Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements, are contained in the Approval Orrter with 

associated emission/operating limitations. 

The Notice of Intent for the above-referenced project has been evaluated and has been found to be 

consistent with the requirements of the Utah Air Conservation Rules (UACR) and the Utah Air 

Conservation Act. However, air pollution producing sources and/or their air control facilities may not 

be constructed, installed, established, or modified prior to the issuance of an Approval Order (AO) by 

the Executive Secretary of the Utah Air Quality Board. 

The Division of Air Quality has determined that a public comment period is not required for your 

particular project referenced above. Unless you have comments which would require changes, the AO 

for this project will be based upon the following conditions: 

eneral Conditions: 

1. This AO applies to the foIlowing company: 

Interstate Brick 

9780 South 5200 West 

West Jordan, Utah 84084 

The equipment listed below in this AO shall be operated at the following location: 

PLANT LOCATION: 

Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Coordinate System: 4,491.5 km North, 413.5 km 

East 

2. Definitions of terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used 

in the UACR, Utah Administrative Codes (UAC), and Series 40 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (40 CFR). T'hese definitions take precedence unless specifically defined 

otherwise herein. 

3. Interstate Brick shall operate the brick manufacturing facility according to the information 

submitted in the Notices of Intent dated November 30, 1992, December 1993, June 7, 

1994, and additional information dated September 22, 1994, and according to 

requirements listed in this AO. 

< ~7 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 3 

4. Regardless of any inconsistency between conditions of this AO and Section IX.H.2.b.0 

and Section IX.H.2, this AO shall take precedence as provided by R307-1-3.2.4, UAC. 

5. A copy of this AO shall be posted on site. The AO shall be available to the employees 

who operate the air emission producing equipment. These employees shall receive 

instruction as to their responsibilities in operating the equipment according to all of the 

relevant conditions listed below. 

6. The approved installations shall consist of the following equipment: 

A. Tunnel Kiln #1 

B. Tunnel Kiln #3 

C. Tunnel Kiln #4 

D. Griz.zly Hopper 

E. Primary Crusher 

F. Secondary Crusher/Grinding 

G. Screens 

H. Two Lime Silos. 

I. Clay Storage Piles 

J. Miscellaneous Diesel Equipment 

K. Line 3 Baghouse - Micro Pulsaire* 

L. Line 4 Baghouse - Micro Pulsaire* 

* Or Equivalent 

7. This AO shall replace the AO dated October 20, 1980. 

S. Interstate Brick shall rebuild the scrubber or design a new scrubbing system for Kiln #3. 

If the scrubber is rebuilt, the scrubber shall be rebuilt as described in the Notice of Intent 

dated December 10, 1993. Should the scrubber require replacement, or modifications 

other than those described as "Alternative A" in the December 10, 1993, Notice of 

Intent, Interstate Brick shall submit complete design specifications including operating 

parameters and proposed emission limitations for approval prior to construction. In no 

case shalI emissions of any pollutant from a newly designed scrubbing system exceed 

emission limitations listed in this AO as final limits. 

~~ 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 4 

Interstate Brick shall modify the scrubber for Kiln #4 as proposed in the Notice of Intent 

dated November 30, 1992. In addition, Interstate Brick shall operate the scrubber for 

Kiln #4 using soda ash in the scrubbing solution until modifications to the scrubber for 

Kiln #3 are complete and stack testing on the scrubber for KiIn #3 demonsuates that the 

scrubber is meeting the emission limits listed in this AO. 

Limitations and Tests Procedures 

9. Emissions to the atmosphere fcom the indicated emission point shall not exceed the 

following rates and concentrations: 

, A. Scrubber Emissions - Tunnel Kiln #1: 

Pollutan. Transition Limits Final Limits 

(to October 1. 1995) 

PM,o (annual average)* Shall not operate 1.9 ib/hr 

, SO=(1-hr average) 17.0 lb/hr 

SO=(annual average) 14.0 lb/hr 

NO,, 1.8 ib/hr 

HF (1-hr average) 4.5 lb/hr 

HF (annual average) 1.5 lb/hr 

B. Scrubber Emissions - Tunnel Kiln #3: 

llutan Transition Limits Final Limits 

(to October 1. 1995) 

PM,o (annual average)* 3.61b/hr 1.9 !b/hr 

SOz(1-hr average) 105.0 lb/hr 17.0 lb/hr 

SO;(annual average) 36.81b/hr 14.0 lb/hr 

NO; 1.8 Ib/hr 1.8 !b/hr 

HF (1-hr average) 10.5 Ib/hr 4.5 lb/hr 

HF (annual average) 3.5 lb/hr 1.5 lb/hr 

sq 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 5 

C. Scrubber Emissions - Tunnel Kiln #4 

Pollutant Transition Limits Final Limits 

(to October 1. 1995) 

PM,a (annual average)* 12.3 lb/hr 12.3 Ib/hr 

SOZ(1-hr average) 51.0 lb/hr 77.0 Ib/hr 

SO=(annual average) 18.0 lb/hr 27.0 lb/hr 

NO,, 2.6 lb/hr 2.6 lb/hr 

HF (1-hr average) 5.7 lb/hr 7.2 lb/hr 

HF (annual average) 1.9 Ib/hr 2.4 Ib/hr 

* PM,o emission rates expressed as annual averages above for the scrubbers for 

Kilns #1, #2, and #3 shall be demonstrated through an 8-hr stack test. Should 

PM,oemissions test at a higher rate than the limits expressed above, Interstate 

Brick shall provide documentation which demonstrates that the limits are being 

met, on an annual average basis, within 30 days of the date of the stack test. 

The method provided in the documentation shall be verifiable. 

D. Primary Crusher Baghouse Vent 

PMIO 0.49 Ibs/hr 0.016 grains/dscf 

E. Line 3 Baghouse 

PM,o 0.37 lbs/hr 0.016 grains/dscf 

F. Line 4 Baghouse 

PM,o 0.67 Ibs/hr 0.016 grains/dscf 

10. Stack testing to show compliance with the emission limitations stated in the above 

condition (excluding annual average emission rates for SO xand HF, but including annual 

average emission rates for PM,O) shall be performed as specified below; 

Emission Point Pollutant Testing Test 

Status Freguengy 

Scrubber, Kiln #1 PM,o *** ® 

SOZ *** % 

NO= *** ® 

HF *** % 

2 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 6 

Scrubber, Kiln #3 

Scrubber, Tunnel Kiln #4 

Primary Crusher Baghouse 

Line 3 Baghouse 

Line 4 Baghouse 

PM10 ** ® 

SO2 ** ryo 

NOX ** ® 

HF ** % 

PM,o ** ® 

S02 ** % 

NO; ** ® 

HF ** % 

PM,a 

PMIO ** ~ 

PMIO ** ® 

Me-stine Status(To be applied above) 

** Initial compliance testing is required. The initial test shall be completed by 

December 1, 1994, to show compliance with emissions limits listed during the 

transition period. 

An additional initial test shall be completed to show compliance with emission 

limits listed as final limits. Testing to show compliance with the final emission 

limits shall be completed by November 1, 1995 

*** Initial compliance testing is required within 30 days of start-up of Tunnel Kiln 

#1. 

® Test if directed by the Executive Secretary. Tests may berequired if the source 

is suspected to be in violation with other conditions of this AO. 

# Test every year 

96 Test every three years 

A. Notification 

The applicant shall provide a notification of the test date at least 30 days before the test. 

A pretest conference shall be held if directed by the Executive Secretary. It shall be held 

at least 15 days before the test between the owner/operator, the tester, and the Executive 

Secretary. The emission point shall be designed to conform to the requirements of 40 

CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 1, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration 

(OSHA) or Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) approvable access shall be 

provided to the test location. 

d/ 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 7 

B. Pm_io 

For stacks in which no liquid drops are present, the following methods shall be used: 40 

CFR 51, Appendix M, Methods 201 or 201a. The back half condensibles shall also be 

tested using the method specified by the Executive Secretary. All particulate captured 

shall be considered PM, o. 

For stacks in which liquid drops are present, methods to eliminate the liquid drops shouid 

be explored. If no reasonable method to eliminate the drops exists, then the following 

methods shall be used: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5, 5a, 5d, or Se as 

appropriate. The back half condensibles shall also be tested using the method specified 

by the Executive Secretary. The portion of the front half of the catch considered PM, o 

shall be based on information in AP-42, Appendix C or other data acceptable to the 

Executive Secretary. 

The back half condensibles shall not be used for compliance demonstration but shall be 

used for inventory purposes. 

Compliance testing of PM IO emissions for Kilns #1, #2, and #3 shall be conducted over 

an eight hour dme period. 

C. Sample Location 

40 CFR 60. Appendix A, Method 1 

D. Volumetric Flow Rate 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2 

E. Sulfur Dioxide (SO.,) 

. 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 6, 6A, 6B or 6C 

F. Nitrogen Oxides (NOJ 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 7, 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D or 7E 

G. Hvdroflouric Acid (HF) 

The test method shall be submitted for approval or may be assigned by the Executive 

Secretary. 

/' 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 8 

H. Calculations 

To determine mass emission rates (ibs/hr, etc.), the pollutant concentration as determined 

by the appropriate methods above shall be multiplied by the volumetric flow rate and any 

necessary conversion factors determined by the Executive Secretary to give the results 

in the specified units of the emission limitation. 

I. New Source Ooeration 

For a new source/emission point (Line 4 and Line 5 baghouses), the production rate 

during all compliance testing shall be no less than 90% of the production rate listed in 

this AO. If the maximum AO allowable production rate has not been achieved at the 

time of the test, the following procedure shall be followed: 

1) Testing shall be at no less than 90% of the production rate achieved to 

date. 

2) If the test is passed, the new maximum allowable production rate shall 

be 11090 of the tested achieved rate. This new allowable maximum 

production rate shall remain in affect until successfully tested at a higher 

rate. 

3) The owner/operator shall request a higher production rate when 

necessary. Testing at no less than 9090 of the higher rate shall be 

conducted. A new maximum production rate (1109'0 of the new rate) 

will then be allowed if the test is successful. This process may be 

repeated until the maximum AO production rate is achieved. 

J. Existing Source QReration 

For an existing source/emission point, the production rate during all compliance 

testing shall be no less than 90% of the maximum production achieved in the 

previous three (3) years. 

11. Compliance with annual average limitations listed in condition #9 shall be determined 

through a method of mass balance. Interstate Brick shall submit a mass balance method 

of determining annual emissions to the Executive Secretary for approval no later than 

December 1, 1994. The plan shall include: 

A. Proposed test methods and test frequency for determining the weight of the 

elemental sulfur and fluorine contained in the clays used to manufacture brick 

B. Proposed test methods and test frequency for determining the weight of the 

elemental sulfur and fluorine contained in the finished product 

C. A method of determining scrubber efficiencies as an annual average 

a 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 9 

D. Calculation method of determining annual emissions of S0 2and HF which will 

demonstrate compliance with the annual average emission rate(s) listed in 

condition #9 of this AO 

12. The following limits shall not be exceed without prior approval in accordance with R307- 

1-3.1, UAC. 

A. Production/Consumption Iimits 

i) Raw Clay Consumption 

120 tons/hr 

1,051,200 tons/year 

ii) 512,582 tons of brick produced per 12-month period, plantwide 

B. Tunnel Kiln #1 

Annual production limit of bricks included in 12.A.ii above 

Note: Interstate Brick is not operating Tunnel Kiln #1 as of the date of this AO 

and it is not allowed to operate during the transition period (to 10/1/95). The 

scrubber for Kiln #1 requires rebuilding and modifications to meet the emission 

limits contained in condition #9. Interstate Brick shall submit a complete 

description of proposed modifications to the scrubber for Tunnel Kiln #1, and 

receive approval from the Executive Secretary, prior to construction. 

C. Tunnel Kiln #3 

Annual production limit of bricks included in 12.A.ii above 

D. Tunnel Kiln #4 

Annual production limit of bricks included in 12.A.ii above 

E. Line 3 Baghouse 

6,240 hours per year 

F. Line 4 Baghouse 

6,240 hours per year 

Compliance with the annual limitations shall be determined on a rolling 12-month total. 

The owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total based on the first day of each 

month using data from the previous 12 months. Records of consumption/production shall 

be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records of 

to q 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 10 

consumption/production, including rolling 12-month totals shall be made available to the 

Executive Secretary or his representative upon request, and shall include a period of two 

years ending with the date of the request. The records shall be kept on a daily basis. 

Hours of operation shall be determined by supervisor monitoring and maintaining of an 

operations log. 

13. Visible emissions from the following emission points shall not exceed the following 

values: 

A. All crushers - 1535 opacity 

B. All screens - 10% opacity 

C. All conveyor transfer points - 10% opacity 

D. All baghouses - 109 opacity 

E. All other points - 20% opacity 

Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted according 

to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. Visibie emissions from mobile sources and 

intermittent sources shall use procedures similar to Method 9, but the requirement for 

observations to be made at 15-second intervals over a six-minute period'shall not apply. 

14. The moisture content of the clay shall be maintained at an average of no less than 4.035 

by weight. The siit content of the clay shall be no greater than an average of 18.0% by 

weight. The moisture content and the silt content shall be tested if directed by the 

Executive Secretary using the appropriate ASTM method. 

15. The storage piles shall be watered to minimize generation of fugitive dusts as dry 

conditions warrant or as determined necessary by the Executive Secretary. 

Fuels 

16. The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a fuel and propane as a backup fuel in 

the kilns. If any other fuel is to be used, an AO shall be required in accordance with 

R307-1-3.1, UAC. 

1%4odelin ff 

17. This source has been modeled for fluoride emissions prior to issuance of this AO. 

Interstate Brick shall submit an analysis using parameters measured during the initial 

stack test for each scrubber. The analysis shall include parameters measured as compared 

with the parameters used in the modeling exercise completed. Critical parameters to be 

included in the analysis are as follows: 

A. Exhaust exit temperature 

B. Exhaust exit velocity/flow 

C. Fluoride emission rate 

~~ 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 11 

The results of the analysis shall be used to determine the applicability of the modeling 

completed. Additional modeling shall be performed if directed by the Executive 

Secretary. 

Monitoring 

18. Interstate Brick shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device for the 

continuous measurement of the change in pressure of the gas stream throuah each 

cru ber. The monitoring device must be certified by the manufacturer. The monitoring 

device shall be accurate within plus or minus one inch of water gauge and must be 

calibrated on an annual basis according to the manufacturer's instructions. Continuous 

recording for the monitoring device is not required. However, daily records of readings 

shall be maintained and dates of calibrations shall be recorded. 

Interstate Brick shall measure and record the pressure drop during each compliance stack 

test of each scrubber. The pressure drop measured during the most recent compliance 

stack test shall be the minimum (-10%) of that required during all operating periods. 

19. Interstate Brick shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device for the 

continuous measurement of the scrubbing_liquid flow rate to the scrubber. The 

monitoring device must be.certified by the manufacturer. Accuracy shall be within plus 

or minus five percent of the design scrubbing liquid flow rate. Calibration shall be on 

an annual basis according to the manufacturer's instructions. Continuous recording for 

the monitoring device is not required. However, daily records of readings shall be 

maintained and dates of calibrations shall be recorded. 

Interstate Brick shall measure and record the scrubbing liquid flow rate during each 

compliance stack test on each sciubber. The scrubbing liquid flow rate measured during 

the most recent compliance stack test shall be the minimum (-10%) of that required 

during all operating periods. 

20. Interstate Brick shall measure the pH of the scrubbing solution for each scrubber on a 

daily basis. The measuring device must be certified by the manufacturer as being 

accurate to plus or minus 5%. The measuring device shall be calibrated on a monthly 

basis. 

Interstate Brick shall measure and record the pH of the scrubbing liquid, and the type of 

neutralizer (hydrated lime, soda ash, etc.) during each compliance stack test of each 

scrubber. The pH measured during the latest compliance stack test shall be the minimum 

pH (-595) of the scrubbing solution during all operating periods. The neutralizer used 

during the most recent compliance stack test shall be that required during all operating 

periods. 

Records & Miscellaneous 

21. All installations and facilities authorized by this AO shall be adequately and properly 

maintained. All pollution control vendor recommended equipment shall be installed, 

3010 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 12 

maintained, and operated. Instructions from the vendor or established maintenance 

practices that maximize pollution control shall be used. All necessary equipment control 

and operating devices, such as pressure gauges, amp meters, volt meters, flow rate 

indicators, temperature gauges, continuous emission monitors (CEMs), etc., shall be 

installed and operated properly and easily accessible to compliaace inspectors. A copy 

of all manufacturers' operating instruction for pollution control equipment and pollution 

emitting equipment shall be kept on site. These instructions shall be available to all 

employees who operate the equipment and shall be made available to compliance 

inspectors upon their request. 

22. All records referenced in this AO or in applicable NSPS or NESHAP, which are required 

to be kept by the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Executive Secretary or 

his representative upon request. Examples of records to be kept at this source shall 

include the following as applicable: 

A. Production rate/operating hour limitations (Condition number 12) 

B. Scrubber operating parameters (Condition numbers 18, 19, and 20) 

C. Unavoidable Breakdown Reports (Condition number 24) 

D. Emergency episodes (Condition number 25) 

23. The owner/operator shall comply with R307-1-3.5, UAC. This rule addresses emission 

inventory reporting requirements. 

24. The owner/operator shall comply with R307-1-4.7, UAC. This rule addresses 

unavoidable breakdown reporting requirements. The owner/operator shall 

calculate/estimate the excess emissions whenever a breakdown occurs. The total of 

excess emissions shall be reported to the Executive Secretary as directed for each 

calendar year. 

25. The owner/operator shall submit to the Executive Secretary an emergency episode plan 

within 60 days of the date of this AO. The plan shall identify what control/production 

measures the owner/operator shall implement when an emergency episode is declared by 

the Executive Director of the Department of Environmental Quality. Specific 

control/production measures shall be outlined for all three levels (Alert, Warning, 

Emergency). The values for the various levels are listed in R307-1-5, UAC. The 

emergency plan shall be approved by the Executive Secretary. 

Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be approved in accordance 

with R307-1-3. 1. 1, UAC. 

This AO in no way releases the owner or operator from any liability for compliance with all other 

applicable federal, state, and local regulations including the UACR. 

".00 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 13 

Annual emissions for this source, the entire piant, are currently calculated at the following values: 

Pollutant Total Emissions 

tons/year 

TSP 112.1 

PMIO 88.8 

S02 240.9 

NOX 65.7 

CO 27.2 

VOC 0.8 

HF 23.7 

These calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicability of Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration (PSD) and nonattainment area major source requirements of the UACR. They are not to 

be used for purposes of determining compliance. 

In accordance with the requirements of Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act, the following pollutants may 

be subject to an operating permit fee. Both the fee rate and the class of pollutants are subject to change 

by state, the federal agencies, or both. 

Pollutant Total Emissions 

Tons/Year 

PMIO 88.8 

SOZ 240.9 

NOx 65.7 

VOC 0.8 

HF 23.7 

The Division of Air Quality is authorized to charge a fee for reimbursement of the actual costs incurred 

in the issuance of an AO. Unless you have comments which would require additional work, the fee for 

this AO will be $4,625.00. An invoice is attached. Your AO can be issued as soon as payment is 

received. 

Sincerely, 

Lynn R. Menlove, Manager 

New Source Review Section 

I 
DAQE-947-94 

October 27, 1994 

Page 14 

Znterstate Hrick Company 

Tunnel Ailn #4 

Salt Lake Connty - CDS Al NA Tozics TitlevMajor 

Filing Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.00 

Review Engineer 64.00 honrs @ $50.00/hr . . . . $ 3,200.00 

Modeler . . . . 28.50 honrs @ $50.00/hr . . . $ 1,425.00 

Compnter Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.00 

Notice To Paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.00 

Travel . . . . . 0.0 miles @ $0.23/mile . . . . $ 0.00 

Total Charges. . .~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,625.00 

Amonnt Paid to Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.00 

Balance Due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,625.00 

Please remit a covv of this invoice with yonr pavment. 

Please send payment to: 

Utah Division of Air Qnality 

1950 West North Temple 

Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-8420 

(801) 536-4000 

m 
Appendix "B" 

(AET Pretest Protocol) 

ogmtucan Envizon»zanEat 9astin9 eom#ancJ ffr2c. 

clPino, IPGanLx, o4u:zana c5'crr ~ e1ty, 2zEa4 

702-786-8533 6o2-2S3-3354 801-266-7m 

Q1 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL 

TESTING COMPANY, INC. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah .84660 

(801) 266-7111 

Pre-test Information Form & Attachments 

SOURCE INFORMATION November 21, 1994 

Facility Name: Interstate Brick Company 

Units to be Tested: 1. No. 3 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 

2. No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 

3. No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Outlet 

Mailing Address: 9780 South 5200 West, West Jordan, Utah 84088-5689 

Plant Address: Same as above 

Phone: (801) 280-5200 

- Plant Contact: Mr. James Keck, Plant Manager 

Test Date: Week of December 5, 1994 

CONTRACTOR OR TEST FIRM 

Name: American Environmental Testing, Company, Inc. 

Address: 565 South Birch Drive, Spanish Fork, Utah, 84660 

Phone: (801) 266-7111 

Contact: V. Brent Benson, Technical Director 

SOURCE TEST SUMMARY 

EPA Method 1 Location of Sample 8 Velocity 1, 2& 3 

Traverses from Stationary 

Sources 

-1- 

~` 
EPA Method 2 Stack Gas Veiocity and Flow 1, 2& 3 

Rate from Stationary Sources 

EPA Method 3 Gas Analysis for Carbon Dioxide 1, 2& 3 

Oxygen, Excess Air & Dry 

Molecular Weight of Stack 

Gases 

EPA Method 4 Moisture Content in Stack 1 &3 

Gases 

EPA Method 5 Particulate Emissions from 1& 3 

Stationary Sources 

EPA Method 6C Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from 1, 2& 3 

Stationary Sources 

(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) 

EPA Method 7E Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from 1, 2& 3 

Stationary Sources 

(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) 

EPA Method 13B Total Fluoride Emissions from 1& 3 

Stationary Sources 

(Specific lon Electrode Method) 

CEMS Gas Standards for Determination of Compliance 

I. S02 (span 0-1000 ppm) 

a) Between 40-60% of span (400-600 ppm) 514.6 ppm 

b) Between 80-100% of span (800-1000 ppm) 901.6 ppm 

11. NOx (span 0-300 ppm) 

a) Between 40-60% of span (120-180 ppm) 159.4 ppm 

b) Between 80-100% of span (240-300 ppm) 251.1 ppm 

CALIBRATION DATA 

The Federal EPA and individual air pollution control agencies require various calibrations for 

specific items included in the EPA Method 5 sample train. Current calibrations for all of these 

items are included in Appendix "A". 

-2- 1 0q" 
PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 

The manufacture of brick and related products such as clay pipe, pottery and some types of 

refractory brick involves the mining, grinding, screening and blending of the raw materials, 

and the forming, cutting or shaping, drying or curing, and firing of the final product. 

Surface clays and shales are mined in open pits. Most fine clays are found underground. After 

mining, the material is crushed to remove stones and is stirred before it passes onto screens for 

segregation by particle size. 

To start the forming process, clay is mixed with water, usually in a pug mill. The three 

principal processes for forming brick are stiff mud, soft mud and dry press. In the stiff mud 

process, sufficient water is added to give the clay plasticity, and bricks are formed by forcing 

the clay through a die. Wire is used in separating bricks. AII structural tile and most and most 

brick are formed by this process. The soft mud process is usually used with clay too wet for the 

stiff mud process. The clay is mixed with water to a moisture content of 20 to 30 percent, and 

the bricks are formed in molds. In the dry press process, clay is mixed with a small amount of 

water and formed in steel molds by appiying pressure of 500 to 1500 pounds per square inch. 

Wet clay units that have been formed are almost completely dried before firing, usually with 

waste heat from kiins. Many types of kilns are used for firing brick, but the most common are 

the downdraft periodic kiln and the tunnel kiln. The periodic kiln is a permanent brick 

structure with a number of fireholes where fuel enters the furnace. Hot gases from the fuel are 

drawn up over the bricks, down through then by underground flues, and out of the oven to the 

chimney. Although lower heat recovery makes this type less efficient than the tunnel kiln, the 

uniform temperature distribution leads to a good quality product. 

SAMPLE TRAIN AND ANALYSIS INFORMATION 

Interstate Brick company is currently operating under the Utah Department of Environmental 

Quality (UDEQ) "Intent to Approve Number DAQE-947-94" which requires that particulate 

testing be accomplished using EPA Method 201 A; unless liquid drops are present in the gas 

stream (which was found to be the case). EPA Method 5 will be used to substitute for EPA 

Method 201 A for th-e No. 4 Kiln Outlet. The back half condensibles shall be tested using the 

method specified by the Executive Secretary (EPA Method 202). 

An EPA Method 5 sample train will be employed to perform the moisture, velocity and 

particulate determinations on the above reference testing. A stainless steel or quartz probe 

liner will be used and maintained at a temperature of 248 0± 25° F for the duration of the test. 

The filter holder will also be kept at a temperature of 248° ± 25° F. The first two (2) 

impingers will contain 100 mis of distilled water, the third impinger will be left empty, and 

the fourth will contain a known amount of silica gel. AII impingers will be weighed before and 

after each test to determine the moisture content of the gases. The impinger bath will be 

maintained at a temperature lower than 68° F to condense stack moisture. A minimum sample 

volume of 31 scf of a rate no less than 0.531 cfm is required. Pitot tubes and the meter system 

will be leak checked before and after sampling. Figure I is a schematic of the sample train to be 

used. 
W 

} ~ W 

~ in 

W ~ 

(f1 F" W a 

H 

~ d 

W ' W 

~ m 

4 

a~ a 

W y~,~ ~ N 

W 

H 

~ 

0 

LAJ 

tJ] ~ 

W a 

~ 

~ H d ~ W 0- 

x W 

1'- 

= 4 4 

W a_ 

W -J 

J ~ 

Y ~ 

= LLI d ~ 

CU ~ 

~ 

lx 

W 

~ • 

lx W + 

2 F' 

~ • a 

~ O 

~ + 

H = 

~ W • 

Q J O 0 

~ W ~ W 

H ■ 

d 

W 

cz 

-cc 

LLI 

L) -cc 4 t^ 

2 ~ F4 

m W 

LLI ? 

~ ~ } ~ 0_ 

W ~ d GJ ~ _ 

d CD 

~~ H 

~ 

~ d 

~ 

fJS 

ac 

W 

a 

ILI ~ 

~ } 

~ d 

lx W 

W 

~ 

0 

a 4 

~ 

H 

O H 

a 

~ 

~ 

L 

~ 

LL 

C 

~ 

L Q. 

E ~ 

~ 

LO 

G 

s 

.r 

m 

~ 

Q 

a 

W 

cx W 

H W 

z 

co 

4 

G) 

L6_ 

~ 

O 

9~ 
EPA Methods 6C, 7E are instrumental methods. The sample train incorporates taking a sample 

lirie from the stack, conditioning the sample, and finally running it through the analyzers. 

Figure II is a schematic of the analyzer sample train, showing both sample line locations and 

calibration line locations. Variations to this schematic will be made according to each method. 

The mass emission calculations for S0 2and NOXwill use the flow rate (DSCFH) derived from 

each of the EPA Method 5 tests respectfully. 

An EPA Method 201 A sample train will be employed to perform the above referenced PM 10 

testing. The sampling device used is a Cyclone I of the SRIIEPA five-stage series cyclone. This 

device provides a 10 micron size cut at a flow rate of approximately 0.5 dscfm; the precise flow 

rate depends on local stack conditions. A glass or teflon probe liner will be used and maintained 

at a temperature of 248° ± 25°F for the duration of the test. The filter holder will also be kept 

at a temperature of 248 0± 25°F. The first two (2) impingers will contain 100 mis of 

distilled water, the third impinger will be lift empty, and the fourth will contain a known 

amount of silica gel. AII impingers will be weighed before and after each test to determine the 

moisture content of the gases. The impinger bath will be maintained at a temperature lower that 

68°F to condense the moisture. The back-half impinger solutions will be evaporated and 

weighed or extracted with methylene chloride and evaporated and weighed as per EPA Method 

202 depending on the pH of the solution. Pitot tubes and the meter system will be leak checked 

before and after sampling. Figure III is a schematic of the EPA Method 201A sample train to be 

used. 

STACK SCHEMATIC AND TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS 

The location of sampling and velocity traverse points are rigidly controlled in EPA Method 1 

with respect to the stack diameter and the distance from the sampling ports to up-stream and 

down-stream interferences to laminar flow. A drawing of the exhaust duct and stack showing 

the sampling locations and their relationship to the interferences to flow are shown as follows: 

1. Figure IV for the No. 3 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 

2. Figure V for the No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 

3. Figure VI for the No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Outlet. 

The exact location of each of the traverse points on each of the stack diameters (90 0apart from 

one another at the sample port locations) are given in the following tables. 

1. Table I for the No. 3 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 

2. Table II for the No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Inlet 

3. Table III for the No. 4 Brick Kiln Scrubber Outlet. 
k 

CEM Sample Train 

Fi gure 11 

Continuous Emissions Analyzers 

Cali bration Gases 

-6- ~ b 
OC W H W 

~ 

O 

~ 

~ 

W 

2 F~ 

O 

L 

~ 

C 

~ 

L 

~ 

~ 

a 

E a~ 

N 

Q 

T 

~ 

N 

v 

C 

t 

r 

~ 

~ 

Q 

a 

W 

OC 

W 

J 0. E 4c to 

O 

~ 

~ 

0. 

~ W ~ 

} ~ 

-7- ~~ 
48" 

Interstate Brick Compeny 

No. 3 Kiln Inlet 

Fi gure I V 

A= 251 "= 5.23 Diameters B= 120" = 2.5 Diameters 

~ r 
Interstete Brick Compony 

No. 4 Kiln Inlet 

Figure V 

~ 

L

48" 

-9- 

~~ 
-10- ~ 

120" 

A = 523" = 4.35 Di 

B=366"=3.04Di 

Interstate Brick Company 

No. 4 Kiln Outlet , 

Figure V1 
5 10 15 20 

. . . . 

4 9 14 19 

. . . . 

3 8 13 18 

. . . . 

2 7 12 17 

. . . . 

1 6 11 16 

. . . . 

48" 

9.6" 

4.8 .. 

Interstate Brick Company 

No.3 Kiln Inlet 

Table I 

48" 

~ 66 16 66 

Sample Ports are 15" Long 

Semple Poi nt Distance from outside of Port 

1,6, 1 1, 16 19.8" = 19 3}4" 

2, 7, 12, 17 29.4" = 29 3I8" 

3, 8, 13, 18 39.0" = 39" 

4, 9, 14, 19 48.6" = 48 5I8" 

5, 10, 15, 20 58.2" = 58 114" 

- 11 - R 
4 8 12 

. . . 

3 7 11 

. . . 

2 6 10 

. . . 

t 5 9 

. . . 

48" 

Interstate Brick Company 

No.4 Kiln Inlet 

Table II 

48 .. 

66 66 6 

Sample Ports are 15" Long 

Sample Poi nt I I Distance from outside of Port 

1,5,9 21.0"=21" 

2, 6, 10 33.0" = 33" 

3, 7, 1 1 45.0" = 45" 

4, 8, 12 57.0" = 57" 
5 10 15 20 25 

. . . . . 

4 9 14 19 24 

. . . . . 

3 8 13 18 23 

. . . . . 

2 7 12 17 22 

. . . . . 

1 6 11 16 21 

. . . . . 

120" 

Interstate Brick Company 

No.4 Kiln Outlet 

Table I11 

120.5" 

16 16 16 16 66 

Sample Ports are 15.75" Long 

Sample Point Distance from outside of Port 

1, 6, 11, 16 & 21 27.75" = 27 3/4" 

2, 7, 12, 17 & 22 51.75" = 51 3f4" 

3, 8, 13, 18 & 23 75.75" = 75 3!4" 

4,9,14,19&24 99.75" = 99 3J4" 

5, 10, 15, 20 & 25 123.75" = 123 3l4" 

m 
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS AND OTHER REGIUIREMENTS 

AII testing stations will be accessible from OSHA approved scaffolding or platforms. AET will 

require 4- 120V, 20 amp, 10 circuits to be provided by Interstate Brick Company in order to 

perform the emissions tests. 

AET does not anticipate at this time that during these tests it will be necessary to deviate from 

any of the methodology specified in 40 CFR 60. A copy of Interstate Brick Company's Current 

Approval Order is contained in Appendix "B". 

-14- 
Appendix "C" 

(Production Data) 

Amatfcan &vEzonmanEaf gEStin9 eom#any ffnc. 

cRino, aNtv" gwocnfx, ogti.zona ~'Q.fr lag eay, 2[tag 

702-786-8553 6o2-253-3354 8oi-z66-7m 
e6 

~k I-rl c'c k~ Lr

` 

"ZO 

A-IIAJ '.~` rn -e 

~ ~ 

~ ~ 

I NTERSTATE ZRICK 

socrth 5200 Wesr 

West Jordast, Utah 8d,088-56a9 

(807) 565-5200 

800/233-8654 (NA7"L) 

800/233-1244 (UTr~I-n 

(80Z) 56S.5220 FAX -7 0,' ~ 6 -7! I, 

PX-f-, ~~ c~ ~.- t ~, 

1~

2r

: °`c. - ~~ n S 

..r 

~~~ =~ 1c o• c,~'~ ~v S~ ~ Z~ b 

~ 

~ 

Q-~ .z-o 

" 

. ~ 

~ `rt s +ns 

vv'T 2zc--S 

.~ 

- I r• 

lV7 

W.-Yri Ix : ~ ~ xSx~,~~~~~,s ~ 

sh: Y~Te I 

. 1 

}' vr~ ~e-✓ o'~ ' ~ : .°.+~ r c ~ I 

,IpACIFtC CoAST 

Auil ~ in; provuG:a~ 
Appendix "D" 

(Field & Laboratory Data). 

o. 

, 

ogmczican Envizonm.cnEcrt 9 ~utiny eom/sany ffnc. 

702-786-8533. 6o2-253-3354 8or-266-7»> 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

MOISTURE & FLOW RATE DATA FORMAT 

1 Plant Interstate Brick 

2 City West Jordan,Utah 

3 Location Kiln #3 

4 Operator Ryan Benson 

5 Date 12/7/94 

6 Test Number EPA 4 - #1 Compliance 

7 Stack Diameter (in) 54.16 

8 Sample Box Number RAC #2A 

9 Meter Box Number RAC #2824 

10 Meter "H@ 1.613 

11 Meter Calibration, Y 0.917 

12 Pitot Tube, Cp 0.8429 

13 Probe Length (ft) 6'-B 

14 Probe Liner Material Stainless Steel 

15 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 248. 

16 Ambient Temperature (°F) 40 

17 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 25.42 

18 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) -0.18 

19 Absolute Pressure, Pabs (Hg) 25.407 

20 C Factor 0 

21 Reference "P (in H20) 0.48 

22 Noale Identification Number 1/2"42 

23 Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.502 

24 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 0.002 

25 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 22.3 

26 Stack Area in Square Feet 15.999 

27 Gas Analysis 

28 CO (%) 0 

29 C 0 2 (%) 3.4 

30 02 (%) 14.8 

31 N2 (e) 81.8 
PRE #1 

Pretest and Post-test Velocities 

Time: 1350 

POST #1 - PRE 82 

Time: 1450 

Stack Temp 423 Stack Temp : 420 

Traverse Pretest AP Sq. Root AP Post-test AP Sq. Root AP 

Point # 

1 1.5 1.2247 1.3 1.1402 

2 1.8 1.3416 1.7 1.3038 

3 2.9 1.7029 2.8 1.6733 

4 2.6 1.6125 2.8 1.6733 

5 2.7 1.6432 2.5 1.5811 

6 3.1 1.7607 2.9 1.7029 

7 4.2 2.0494 4 2.0000 

8 5.2 2.2804 5.3 2.3022 

9 5.6 2.3664 5.7 2.3875 

10 5.7 2.3875 5.5 2.3452 

11 2.1 1.4491 2.2 1.4832 

12 2.9 1.7029 2.7 1.6432 

13 3.1 1.7607 3.3 1.8166 

14 4.1 2.0248 3.9 1.9748 

15 3.7 1.9235 3.5 1.8708 

16 3.9 1.9748 4.1 2.0248 

Average = 3.444 1.8253 Average = 3.388 1.8077 

POST #2 - PRE #3 POST #3 

Time: 1545 TI me: 1630 

Stack Temp 425 Stack Temp : 424 

Traverse Pretest AP Sq. Root AP Post-test AP Sq. Root ^P 

Point # 

1 1.7 1.3038 1.4 1.1832 

2 2 1.4142 2.1 1.4491 

3 2.4 1.5492 2.5 1.5811 

4 2.5 1.5811 2.7 1.6432 

5 3.3 1.8166 3.2 1.7889 

6 4.4 2.0976 4.1 2.0248 

7 5.1 2.2583 5.3 2.3022 

8 5.4 2.3238 5.1 2.2583 

9 5.5 2.3452 5.6 2.3664 

10 5.4 2.3238 5.2 2.2804 

11 2.3 1.5166 2.4 1.5492 

12 2.7 1.6432 2.9 1.7029 

13 3.2 1.7889 3.4 1.8439 

14 4.3 2.0736 4.5 2.1213 

15 3.5 1.8708 3.3 1.8166 

16 3.8 1.9494 3.6 1.8974 

Average = 3.594 1.8660 Average a 3.581 1.8631 

' 
Sample Meter Meter Stack Meter Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temperature Volume Voiume 

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference 

(°F) (°F) (°F) (

ft3) ("_) 

Starting 226.342 

1 65 65 401 227.882 1.54 

2 67 68 411 229.392 1.51 

3 67 70 415 230.896 1.50 

4 67 73 416 232.391 1.49 

5 67 75. 417 233.889 1.50 

6 68 79 419 235.392 1.50 

7 69 82 420 236.895 1.50 

8 70 84 421 238.397 1.50 

9 70 86 421 239.909 1.51 

10 72 89 422 241.427 1.52 

11 73 90 422 242.944 1.52 

12 74 91 422 244.457 1.51 

13 75 93 423 245.979 1.52 

14 76 94 424 247.503 1.52 

15 77 96 425 249.016 1.51 

16 78 96 425 250.533 1.52 

17 78 97 421 252.063 1.53 

18 79 98 419 253.585 1.52 

19 80 99 422 255.102 1.52 

20 81 100 425 256.631 1.53 

avg °F 

avg °R 

total ' 

average = 

79.45 419.55 

539.45 879.55 

30.289 30.29 

72.65 . 86.25 419.55 

Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume 

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm 

m 
40 40 

2 1326.50 

Sampling Clock 

T'ime Time 

5.01 247.50 257.75 40.00 

Vacuum Probe Exit Filter Outtet Impinger 

Temperature Temperature Temperature 

(°F) (°F) (°F) 

1.20 

Pressure 

Diff 

"H 

Pressure 

Difference 

"H 

(in H20) 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

12 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

1.2 

Sampling Ctock Vacuum Probe Fifter Impinger 

Time Time Temperature Temperature Temperature 

Exit Exit Outlet 

(min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) (°F) (°F) (°F) 

1300 

2 1302 5.1 245 254 38 

2 1304 5 248 257 38 

2 1306 5 245 254 39 

2 1308 5 247 258 40 

2 1310 5 249 260 40 

2 1315 5 247 257 40 

2 1317 5 249 261 40 

2 1319 5 244 257 41 

2 1321 5 248 261 40 

2 1323 5 247 258 40 

2 1330 5 250 255 40 

2 1332 5 245 257 41 

2 1334 5 249 260 40 

2 1336 5 247 254 40 

2 1338 5 249 259 40 

2 1343 5 250 260 41 

2 1345 5 247 258 42 

2 1347 5 245 257 40 

2 1349 5 249 260 40 

2 1351 5 250 258 40 

411 
POST TEST CALCULATiONS AND INFORMATION 

Actuai Meter Voiume Vm : 30.289 Volume H20 Vic (miis) = 49.1 

Meter Volume Vm Std = 23.177 Volume H20 Vw (std) = 2.311 

Mole Wt Dry Stack Gas = 29.136 Moisture Content Bws = 0.091 

Mole Wt Wet Stack Gas = 28.126 

STACK VELOCITY FT/SECOND DRY STAClC FLOW RATE FT3/HOUR 

Kp a 85.49 Q(std) #1 = 3.8727E+6 

Vs #1 = 145.382 Q(std) #2 - 3.9139E+6 

Vs #2 = 147.0930 Q(std) #3 = 3.9684E+6 

Vs #3 = 149.4789 

Average Meter Temoerature Leak Check Information 

Degrees °F = 79.45 Initial Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes 

Degrees °R = 539.45 Finish 226.271 A= OK 

Start 226.269 B = OK 

Average Delta OH Rate = 0.0020 

AFI = 1.20 Vac. = 22.3 

Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubea 

Average Sqrt OP and Stack Temo °F Finish 256.751 A= OK 

#1 a 1.8165 421.50 Start 256.748 B= OK 

#2 = 1.8369 422.50 Rate = 0.0030 

#3 = 1.8645 424.50 Vac. = 20 

Lenqth of Test Minutes = 40 

Source Testlna Summarv and Comments 

9~ 
EMISSiONS SUMMARY SHEET NOx 

Mass Emission Calibratlon Blas Data 

Run #1 Run #1 

NOx (ppm) 0 31.3 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) _-0.80 

NOx (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) _-0.70 

correctlon) a 31.90 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 159.90 

NOx (Ibs/hr) = 14.751 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 159.40 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 160.40 

Run #2 

NOx (ppm) e 32.44 

Run 42 

Zero Gas Pro (ppm) _-0.70 

NOx (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) a-0.40 

corroction) = 3287 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 159.90 

NOx (Ibs/hr) = 15.359 Cal Gas Protest (ppm) = 160.40 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 159.50 

Run 43 Run #3 

NOx (ppm) = 39.84 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) e-0.40 

NOx (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) _ -0.50 

corroctlon) = 40.26 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) 0 159.90 

NOx (Ibs/hr) 19.078 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 159.50 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 159.60 

9~ 
EAAISSIONS SUMMARY SHEET S02 

Mass Emission Calibration Bias Data 

S02 (ppm) = 600.39 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) _-0.90 

S02 (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) _-0.50 

conrection) = 599.53 Cai Gas Actual (ppm) = 901.60 

S02 (Ibs/hr) : 385.419 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 904.20 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 902.30 

Run #2 Run #2 

S02 (ppm) = 593 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) _-0.50 

S02 (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) o-0.70 

correction) = 592.09 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 901.60 

S02 (Ibs/hr) = 276.692 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 902.30 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 904.30 

Run #3 Run #3 

S02 (ppm) = 547.71 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) --0.70 

S02 (ppm bias Zero Gas Post (ppm) _-0.10 

correction) e 546.41 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 901.60 

S02 (Ibs/hr) = 258.902 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 904.30 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) - 903.70 

9~ 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc_ 

565 So uth Birr.h D rive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

LABORATORY DJ1TA 

EPA Method 5 

Company: Run Number.~1 

Sampiing Location: ~3 k—r-4A,' z ~V e r r Date: /z -7- 7y 

Moisture Coilected 

Impinger 1 

Impinger 2 

Impinger 3 

Impinger 4 

Initial YVeight 

5-7 F V/ 

Szi-7 

5-07f 

777.0 

Final Weight Wetght Gain 

.1/9. 1,( 7-1 . v 

/~/. 6 

Total Gain 

Partkuiate Coilected 

Front - Halt Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Filter and Oven Glassware) 

1.

2.

3.

4.

S. 

Fiiter Finai Weight 

Fiiter Tane YWeight 

Total Filter Weight 

Particulate caught in 

nozzle, probe and gfassware 

Total Front - HaN Catch 

=I 

~ 

Back - Hatf Analysis (Impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 

1. Partkutate caught in Impingers 

evaporated down at less than 

120' F. N14 

Total Particulate Catch (Sum ot Front and Back - Halt Catctles) 

N14 
, .. 

American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

Company: Date: /2-, f~/ 

Source: ~.3 k~rGv ~~vG~T Run Number. .Az 

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry 

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon 

Dixoide 

Carbon 

Monoxide 

3, Lo. ~ 

3 . q z o l 

3 ~~.~ ~ y •~' 3, 1-1 

Average ~ /, f~ ~ L f, ~" 3 , 

z

p ~ 

8 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT 

1 Plant 

2 City 

3 Location 

4 Operator 

5 Date 

6 Method and Run # 

7 Stack Diameter (in) 

8 Sample Box Number 

9 Meter Box Number 

10 Meter "H@ 

11 Meter Calibration, Y 

12 Pitot Tube, Cp 

13 Probe Length (ft) 

14 Probe Liner Material 

15 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 

16 Ambient Temperature (°F) 

17 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 

18 Assumed Moisture (%) 

19 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) 

20 C Factor 

21 Reference "P (in H20) 

22 Nozile Identification Number 

23 Nozzie Diameter (in) 

24 Thermometer Number 

25 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 

26 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 

27 Filter Number 

28 Gas Analysis 

29 CO (%) 

30 C 0 2 (%) 

31 02 (%) 

32 N2 (%) 

Interstate Brick 

West Jordan, Utah 

#4 Kiln 

Greg Johnson 

Monday, 5 December 1994 

EPA 5 & 138 - #1 Compliance 

135.69 

RAC #2 

RAC #2824 

1.613 

0.917 

0.8401 

11'-A 

Stainless 

248 

40 

25.3 

15 

0.01 

0 

0.023 

1/2-#12 

0.501 

1-A 

0.0070 

24 

K-4 

0 

2.23 

16.90 

80.87 
NOaLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKiNETiC ^H 

Dn = 0.501 AH = 0.6033 

constant 0.0357 

Gm 0.75 

Pb(in HG) 25.3 

Pgm(in H20) 0.01 

Pm 25.3007 

Cp 0.8401 

Tm(°17 70 

Tm(°R) 530 

Bwm 0 

Bws 0.15 

Ts(°17 125 

Ts(°R) 585 

Mds 29.0328 

Ms 27.3779 

Pb(in HG) 25.3 

Pgs(in H20) 0.01 

Ps 25.3007 

(^P)avg 0.023 

Dn = 0.5028 

Cp 0.8401 

Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 

Gel H20(g) 12.0000 

V(H20)(mi) 127.8000 

Vm(acf) 49.2300 

"h avg 0.2000 

Vwc 6.0155 

Vmc 38.0360 

Bws = 0.1366 

constant 849.8000 

^H(& 1.0000 

Mds 29.0328 

Mm 29.0328 

K 26.2287 

^P 0.0230 

AH 0.6033 

0 
Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume 

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference 

(°F) (°F) (°F) (ft3) X) 

starting 69.262 

1 59 60 130 70.613 1.35 

2 65 66 128 72.001 1.39 

3 65 69 126 73.392 1.39 

4 66 72 125 74.801 1.41 

5 66 75 127 76.31 1.51 

6 67 78 128 78.112 1.80 

7 68 82 125 80.207 2.10 

8 70 86 125 82.281 2.07 

9 72 88 122 84.392 2.11 

10 73 90 125 86.389 2.00 

11 75 92 125 88.502 2.11 

12 76 93 125 90.456 1.95 

13 77 95 124 92.561 2.11 

14 78 96 123 94.642 2.08 

15 79 97 124 96.694 2.05 

16 80 99 125 98.756 2.06 

17 82 83 - 125 100.864 2.11 

18 82 85 125 102.978 2.11 

19 83 86 124 105.052 2.07 

20 83 87 124 107.093 2.04 

21 83 88 125 109.134 2.04 

22 84 90 125 111.206 2.07 

23 84 92 125 113.285 2.08 

24 84 94 125 115.336 2.05 

25 84 96 124 117.449 2.11 

avg °F 

avg °R 

total = 

average = 75.40 

Sample Meter 

Point Temperature 

Inlet (°F) 

80.48 125.16 

540.48 585.16 

48.1870 48.19 

85.56 125.16 

Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume 

Outtet (°F) T Vm Vm 

I 
Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Ciock Vacuum 

Head Diff ^Ps Time Time 

"Ps "H 

(in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 

1500 

0.01 0.41 0.1000 3 1503 2.2 

0.011 0.46 0.1049 3 1506 2.6 

0.011 0.46 0.1049 3 1509 2.8 

0.012 0.51 0.1095 3 1512 3 

0.015 0.63 0.1225 3 1515 3.5 

0.022 0.93 0.1483 3 1522 4.1 

0.025 1.07 0.1581 3 1525 4.4 

0.024 1.03 0.1549 3 1528 4.3 

0.025 1.08 0.1581 3 1531 4.5 

0.022 0.95 0.1483 3 1534 4 

0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1540 4.5 

0.02 0.87 0.1414 3 1543 4 

0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1546 4.5 

0.024 1.05 0.1549 3 1549 4.4 

0.023 1.01 0.1517 3 1552 4.2 

0.023 1.01 0.1517 3 1600 4.2 

0.025 1.08 0.1581 3 1603 4.5 

0.025 1.08 0.1581 3 1606 4.5 

0.024 1.04 0.1549 3 1609 4.4 

0.022 0.96 0.1483 3 1612 4 

0.022 0.96 0.1483 3 1620 4.1 

0.023 1.00 0.1517 3 1623 4.3 

0.023 1.01 0.1517 3 1626 4.3 

0.022 0.96 0.1483 3 1629 4 

0.025 1.10 0.1581 3 1632 4.5 

75 75 

0.0211 0.9141 0.1441 3 1560.58 3.99 

Velocity Pressure 3qrc Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff "Ps Time Time 

"Ps "H 

//A) 
Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to 

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point 

Exit Outlet Isokinetics 

(°F) (°F) (°F) 

258 . 263 49 6.6179 100.13 

255 258 48 6.9291 96.96 

254 255 48 6.9173 96.77 

254 256 48 7.2188 93.47 

253 251 48 8.0846 89.50 

255 254 47 9.7993 88.11 

258 252 47 10.4194 95.50 

255 253 47 10.2089 96.02 

251 250 47 10.3926 95.22 

250 249 46 9.7742 96.01 

248 250 46 10.4194 95.03 

250 253 47 9.3194 98.04 

248 254 48 10.4105 94.21 

249 255 48 10.1914 94.82 

251 252 48 9.9854 95.43 

250 250 48 9.9939 95.76 

252 248 47 10.4194 94.95 

253 250 47 10.4194 95.07 

254 251 47 10.2001 94.95 

251 252 47 9.7659 97.50 

253 254 48 9.7742 97.51 

252 255 48 9.9939 96.60 

250 256 48 9.9939 96.77 

251 254 47 9.7742 97.45 

250 255 48 10.4105 93.99 

252.20 252.20 47.48 

Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger 

Temperature Temperature Temperature 

(°F) (°F) (°F) 

rDj 
VOLUME DRY GAS 

Vm(std) = 36.5016 

Vm 48.1870 

Vm(std) = 36.5016 

POST TEST CALCULATION 

VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT 

Vw(std) = 6.0485 Bws = 0.1421 

Vic(mis) 128.5 

Vw(std) = 6.0485 

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE: STACK VELOCITY 

Vs = 9.4985 

Mds = 29.0328 

Kp 85.49 

MOL WT WET STACK GASE: Vs = 9.4985 

DRY STACK FLOW RATE 

a(std) = 2.2476E+6 

Mws = 27.4645 

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION 

An = 1.3690E-3 

% ISO = 95.5270 

Initial Leak Check Rate 

Finish 69.028 Pltot Tubes 

Start 69.021 A = OK 

Rate = 0.0070 B = OK 

Vac. = 24 

Final Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes 

Finish 117.566 A = OK 

Start 117.558 B = OK 

Rate = 0.0080 

Vac. - 21.1 

PARTICULATI CONCEJdTRATION 

Cs = 1.2164E-3 

Mn 44.4 

Cs = 1.2164E-3 

ibs/dscf = 2.6816E-6 

grains/dscf = 0.0188 

Ibs/hr = 6.0273 

FLUORIDE CONCENTRATION 

Cs - 4.9587E-4 

Mn 18.1 

Cs = 4.9587E-4 

Ibs/dscf = 1.0932E-6 

grains/.dscf 0.0077 

Ibs/hr - 2.4571 

~~~, 
INLET EMISSIONS SUMMARY 

Mass Emissions 

NOx (ppm) = 13.32 

NOx (ppm bias 

correctlon) 12.36 

NOx (Ibs/hr) 3.318 

Calibration Blas Data 

Run #1 

Zero Gas Pre (ppm) s 1.10 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.90 

Cai Gas Actual (ppm) m 159.90 

Cai Gas Pretest (ppm) a 160.80 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 159.90 

Run #1 

S02 (ppm) = 211.33 

S02 (ppm bias 

correction) : 209.31 

S02 (ibs/hr) 78.096 

Run #1 

Zero Gas Pre (ppm) a 0.00 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) _ -0.30 

Cal Gas Actual (ppm) a 260.70 

Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 264.40 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) m 26210 

/05 
OUTLET EMISSIONS SUMMARY 

Mass Emissions Calibratlon Blas Data 

NOx (ppm) _ 

NOx (ppm bias 

correction) ~ 

NOx (Ibs/hr) 

12.07 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) = 0.90 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.50 

11.43 Cal Gas Actuai (ppm) = 159.90 

3.069 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 159.50 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 159.90 

Run #1 

S02 (ppm) = 35.56 

S02 (ppm bias 

correction) 35.26 

S02 (Ibs/hr) 13.156 

Run #1 

Zero Gas Pre (ppm) = 1.80 • 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) _ -0.90 

Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 163.50 

Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 163.70 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 162.80 

/o ~ 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

LABORATORY DATA 

EP Method 5 

Company: 6 .. Run Number: f~ ~~/~/ ~ S 7` IS'4 

e 

Sampling Location: ~ ~ Date: 

Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain 

Impinger 1 '-~SS ~ - Z • 3 

Impinger 2 S~I • ~I. ~ - ~ 

Impinger 3 D • ~c ` 

Impinger 4 ''~%3 • ~ ~ v• 

~ 

Total Gain = ~ 

Particulate Collected 

Front - Half Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Filter and Oven Glassware) 

1. Flter Final Weight 

2. Filter Tare Weight 

3. Total Ffter Weight 

4. Particulate caught in 

nozzle, probe and glassware 

5. Total Front - Half Catch 

O. 7.3 I 

Back - Half Analysis (Impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 

1. Particulate caught in impingers 

evaporated down at less than 

120° F. 

Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and Back - Half Catches) 

-4-r4 w- ~ 

/ 

IDO 
. 

American Environmenta! Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

N z: ~4 &~ 

► . .: 

. 

Company: ~ ;_ Date:, Z - S:V 

. 

Source: _~ , Run Number: 

ORSAT ANALYSlS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry 

's r ~`~'6 

' 

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon 

Dixoide 

Carbon 

Monoxide 

. ~ 

-47 

e 

3 

. ~ ~,0.9 l~ ~ ?. ~2- 

3 yo j7a 

Average 

7/7 

/~6 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT 

1 Plant 

2 City 

3 Location 

4 Operator 

5 Date 

6 Method and Run # 

7 Stack Diameter (in) 

8 Sample Box Number 

9 Meter Box Number 

10 Meter "H@ 

11 Meter Cafibration, Y 

12 Pitot Tube, Cp 

13 Probe Length (ft) 

14 Probe Liner Material 

15 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 

16 Ambient Temperature (°F) 

17 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 

18 Assumed Moisture (%) 

19 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) 

20 C Factor 

21 Reference ^P (in H20) 

22 Nozzle Identification Number 

23 Nozzle Diameter (in) 

24 Thermometer Number 

25 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 

26 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 

27 Filter Number 

28 Gas Analysis 

29 CO (%) 

30 C 0 2 (%) 

31 02 (%) 

32 N2 (%) 

Interstate Brick 

West Jordan, Utah 

#4 Kiln 

David Hunt 

Tuesday, 6 December 1994 

EPA-5 & 13B - #2 Compliance 

135.69 

RAC #2 

RAC #2824 

1.613 

0.917 

0.8401 

11'-A 

Stainless 

248 

45 

25.2 

15 

0.01 

0 

0.023 

1/2-#12 

0.501 

1-A 

0.0080 

23.6 

K-5 

0 

2.47 

16.80 

80.73 

,V1 
PRETEST CALCULATIONS 

NOaLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH 

Dn o 0.501 ^H = 0.6033 

constant 0.0357 

am 0.75 

Pb(in HG) 25.2 

Pgm(in H20) 0.01 

Pm 25.2007 

Cp 0.8401 

Tm(°F) 70 

Tm(°R) 530 

Bwm 0 

Bws 0.15 

Ts(°F) 125 

Ts(°R) 585 

Mds 29.0672 

Ms 27.4071 

Pb(in HG) 25.2 

Pgs(in H20) 0.01 

Ps 25.2007 

(^P)avg 0.023 

On e 0.5024 

Cp 0.8401 

Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 

Gel H20(g) 12.0000 

V(H20)(ml) 127.8000 

Vm(acfl 49.2300 

"h avg 0.2000 

Vwc 6.0155 

Vmc 37.8857 

Bws = 0.1370 

constant 849.8000 

AH@ 1.0000 

Mds 29.0672 

Mm 29.0672 

K 26.2317 

^P 0.0230 

AH = 0.6033 

~~~ ~ 
Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume 

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference 

(°F) (°F) (°F) (' "') (' `3) 

starting 118.037 

1 64 64 125 119.701 1.66 

2 67 68 124 121.562 1.86 

3 68 71 125 123.559 2.00 

4 68 75 125 125.601 2.04 

5 69 78 125 127.637 2.04 

6 72 78 125 129.767 2.13 

7 73 81 124 131.935 2.17 

8 74 84 125 134.104 2.17 

9 74 87 125 136.262 2.16 

10 75 90 125 138.412 2.15 

11 76 93 124 140.582 2.17 

12 77 95 125 142.755 2.17 

13 78 96 125 144.973 2.22 

14 79 96 123 147.175 2.20 

15 80 97 124 149.372 2.20 

16 81 98 125 151.543 2.17 

17 82 99 124 153.736 2.19 

18 83 99 125 155.955 2.22 

19 84 99 123 158.172 2.22 

20 85 100 125 160.339 2.17 

21 83 92 122 162.355 2.02 

22 84 94 120 164.451 2.10 

23 86 95 121 166.552 2.10 

24 87 97 122 168.549 2.00 

25 87 98 122 170.573 2.02 

avg °F 83.20 123.92 

avg °R 543.20 583.92 

total - 52.5360 52.54 

average 77.44 88.96 123.92 

Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume 

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm 

I Dq 
Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff "Ps Time Time 

"Ps "H 

(in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) 

1000 

0.015 0.63 0.1225 3 1003 3.5 

0.018 0.76 . 0.1342 3 1006 3.7 

0.021 0.89 0.1449 3 1009 4 

0.021 0.89 0.1449 3 1012 4 

0.023 0.98 0.1517 3 1015 4.2 

0.023 0.98 0.1517 3 1030 4.2 

0.025 1.07 0.1581 3 1033 4.5 

0.025 1.08 0.1581 3 1036 4.5 

0.024 1.04 0.1549 3 1039 4.4 

0.024 1.04 0.1549 3 1042 4.4 

0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1050 4.5 

0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1053 4.6 

0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1056 4.6 

0.025 1.10 0.1581 3 1059 4.6 

0.024 1.05 0.1549 3 1102 4.5 

0.024 1.05 0.1549 3 1106 4.5 

0.024 1.06 0.1549 3 1109 4.5 

0.025 1.10 0.1581 3 1112 4.6 

0.025 1.10 0.1581 3 1115 4.6 

0.023 1.01 0.1517 3 1118 4.3 

0.02 0.88 0.1414 3 1130 3.9 

0.021 0.93 0.1449 3 1133 4 

0.021 0.93 0.1449 3 1136 4.1 

0.02 0.89 0.1414 3 1139 3.9 

0.02 0.89 0.1414 3 1142 3.9 

75 75 

0.0226 0.9844 0.1502 3 1068.65 4.26 

Velocity Preasure Sqrt Sampling C1ock Vacuum 

Head Diff "Ps Time Time 

"Ps "H 

`~v 
Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to 

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point 

Exit Outlet Isokinetics 

(°F) (°F) (°F) 

237 238 47 8.0607 98.15 

238 235 47 8.8225 99.57 

240 237 47 9.5376 98.71 

237 236 47 9.5376 100.60 

238 237 47 9.9814 95.55 

238 236 47 9.9814 99.72 

236 235 46 10.3975 96.98 

237 235 46 10.4064 96.79 

238 236 46 10.1961 98.04 

237 235 46 10.1961 97.36 

235 236 46 10.3975 95.91 

237 236 47 10.4064 95.89 

236 235 47 10.4064 97.72 

238 237 47 10.3886 96.77 

237 236 48 10.1874 98.46 

238 236 48 10.1961 97.23 

237 236 48 10.1874 97.97 

235 235 48 10.4064 97.15 

235 236 48 10.3886 96.82 

236 235 48 9.9814 98.66 

233 240 48 9.2838 98.92 

236 238 48 9.4967 99.97 

238 235 48 9.5049 100.05 

238 234 48 9.2838 97.29 

237 233 48 9.2838 98.53 

236.88 236.88 47.24 

Probe Exit Filter Outlet Impinger 

Temperature Temperature Temperrature 

(°F) (°F) (°F) 
VOLUME DRY GAS 

POST TEST CALCULATION 

VOLUME H20 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT 

Vm(std) = 39.4402 Vw(std) = 5.8273 Bws o 0.1287 

Vm 52.5360 

Vm(std) = 39.4402 

Vic(mis) 123.8 

Vw(std) = 5.8273 

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE: 

Mds = 29.0672 

MOL WT WET STACK GASE: 

Mws = 27.6425 

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION 

An = 1.3690E-3 

96 ISO e 97.9395 

STACK VELOCITY DRY STACK FLOW RATE 

Vs e 9.8765 

O(std) = 2.3693E+6 

Kp 85.49 

Vs = 9.8765 

PARTICULATI CONCEIVTRATION 

Cs = 1.6734E-3 

Mn 66 

Cs = 1.6734E-3 

Ibs/dscf = 3.6892E-6 

grains/dscf = 0.0258 

Ibs/hr = 8.7407 

FLUORIDE CONCENTRATION 

Cs = 3.6004E-4 

Initlal Leak Check Rate 

Finish 117.975 Pitot Tubes 

Start 117.967 A = OK 

Rate = 0.0080 B = OK 

Vac. = 23.6 

Fnal Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes 

Finish 170.86 A = OK 

Start 170.853 B = OK 

Rate = 0.0070 

Vac. - 19.8 

Mn 14.2 

Cs = 3.6004E-4 

Ibs/dscf = 7.9374E-7 

graina/dscf 0.0056 

Ibs/hr = 1.8806 

l/111~ 
INLET EMISSIONS SUMIIAARY 

Mass Emissions Calibration Bias Data 

NOx (ppm) _ 

NOx (ppm bias 

correction) n 

NOx (Ibs/hr) 

10.52 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) = 0.90 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) e 0.00 

10.08 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) 0 159.90 

2.851 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) s 159.90 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) 0 160.50 

Run 02 

S02 (ppm) s 137.62 

S02 (ppm bias 

correction) 0 137.82 

S02 (Ibs/hr) 54.205 

Run #!2 

Zero Gas Pro (ppm) _ -0.30 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.00 

Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 260.70 

Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 262.10 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 258.80 
OUTLET E1IAISSiONS SUMMARY 

Mass Emissions Calibratlon Blas Data 

NOx (ppm) - 

NOx (ppm bias 

correction) _ 

NOx (Ibs/hr) 

10.91 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) = 0.50 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) s 0.50 

10.40 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 159.90 

2.943 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 159.90 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 161.10 

Run #2 

S02 (ppm) a 25.52 

S02 (ppm blas 

correction) = 26.16 

S02 (Ibs/hr) 10.290 

Run #2 

Zero Gas Pro (ppm) _ -0.90 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.30 

Cal Gas Actual (ppm) a 163.50 

Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 162.80 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) _ 159.30 

//~f 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

LABORATORY DATA 

EPA Method 5 r--(—!Z 

Company: x-,?~~, ~~ Run Number: 

Sampling Location:~. Date: _ /,::P '/ -.0' ~/ 

Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain 

Impinger 1 Sq 7. 02 -70 1 ' 

Impinger 2 3 I'a ' z 

Impinger 3 -7 707 7 ~ • o 

Impinger 4 7• 1 7r e• -3 P. Z 

Total Gain - I Z 3. e'' 

Particulate Collected 

Front - Half Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Filter and Oven Glassware) 

6). 7 y g s 

1. Filter Fnal Weight o ~ 

2. Fifter Tare Weight • 7O '7 

3. Total Flter Weight D n ~( ~-o : Y~ • O ~ 

4. Particulate caught in 

nozzle, probe and glassware 21. 6 

5. Total Frorrt - Half Catch & 3• ~ ^~ 

Back - Haif Analysis (impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 

1. Particulate caught in impingers . 

evaporated down at less than 

120° F. ~ 

Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and Bacic - Half Catches) 

(' 6-o ^•? 

lb 

ii~ 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

/ 

. . _ D _, - 

Source:0!~ Run Number: 

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Vofume Percent - Dry 

' 

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon 

Dixoide 

Carbon 

Monoxide 

• ~ ~ d /6 , 7 cz r 

z <~

o 

~7 ~0- ~ /d-~ ?• ~ ` O'' 

Average ~ ~3~ ~L'• ~~ a.`l ~ l ~ ~ • 1 

,~~ 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

PARTICULATE FIELD DATA FORMAT 

1 Plant 

2 City 

3 Location 

4 Operator 

5 Date 

6 Method and Run # 

7 Stack Diameter (in) 

8 Sample Box Number 

9 Meter Box Number 

10 Meter "H@ 

11 Meter Calibration, Y 

12 Pitot Tube, Cp 

13 Probe Length (ft) 

14 Probe Liner Materiai 

15 Probe Heater Setting (°F) 

16 Ambient Temperature (°F) 

17 Barometeric Press., Pb (in Hg) 

18 Assumed Moisture (°/a) 

19 Static Pressure, Ps (in H20) 

20 C Factor 

21 Reference ^P (in H20) 

22 Nozzle Identification Number 

23 Nozzle Diameter (in) 

24 Thermometer Number 

25 Pretest Leak Rate (CFM) 

26 Leak Check Vacuum (in H20) 

27 Filter Number 

28 Gas Analysis 

29 CO (%) 

30 C 0 2 (e) 

31 02 (%) 

32 N2 (%) 

Interstate Brick 

West Jordan, Utah 

#4 Kin 

David Hunt 

Tuesday, 6 December 1994 

EPA 5 & 13B - #3 Compliance 

135.69 

RAC #2 

RAC #2824 

1.613 

0.917 

0.8401 

11'-A 

Stainiess 

248 

43 

25.22 

15 

0.01 

0 

0.023 

1/2 - #12 

0.501 

1-A 

0.0090 

20.7 

K-6 

0 

2.47 

16.70 

80.83 
~I:Ta~ _ 1 • . 

NOaLE DIAMETER PRETEST DATA ISOKINETIC AH 

Dn = 0.501 AH - 0.6033 

constant 0.0357 

am 0.75 

Pb(in HG) 25.22 

Pgm(in H20) 0.01 

Pm 25.2207 

CP 0.8401 

Tm(°F) 70 

Tm(°R) 530 

Bwm 0 

Bws 0.15 

Ts(°F) 125 

Ts(°R) . 585 

Mds 29.0632 

Ms 27.4037 

Pb(in HG) 25.22 

Pgs(in H20) 0.01 

Ps 25.2207 

(AP)avg 0.023 

Dn = 0.5025 

Cp 0.8401 

Imp V(H20)(ml) 67.5000 

Gel H20(g) 12.0000 

V(1-120)(ml) 127.8000 

Vm(acfl 49.2300 

"h avg 0.2000 

Vwc 6.0155 

Vmc 37.9158 

Bws = 0.1369 

constant 849.8000 

^ H@ 1.0000 

Mds 29.0632 

Mm 29.0632 

K 26.2314 

AP 0.0230 

AH = 0.6033 

` ~d 
Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume 

Outlet Inlet Ts Vm difference 

(°F) (°F) (°F) (ft3) (ft3) 

starting 171.228 

1 76 77 122 173.178 1.95 

2 76 77 121 175.184 2.01 

3 77 79 122 177.223 2.04 

4 77 82 121 179.314 2.09 

5 78 85 122 181.475 2.1.6 

6 78 85 121 183.673 2.20 

7 79 87 122 185.876 2.20 

8 79 89 122 188.082 2.21 

9 80 92 121 190.262 2.18 

10 81 95 122 192.421 2.16 

11 83 97 122 194.624 2.20 

12 84 99 121 196.846 2.22 

13 85 101 121 199.075 2.23 

14 87 103 122 201.289 2.21 

15 88 103 122 203.496 2.21 

16 89 105 121 205.774 2.28 

17 91 107 118 207.992 2.22 

18 91 107 120 210.262 2.27 

19 92 107 121 212.484 2.22 

20 87 104 122 214.701 2.22 

21 87 105 121 216.913 2.21 

22 88 105 121 219.195 2.28 

23 89 107 121 221.358 2.16 

24 90 107 120 223.496 2.14 

25 91 107 121 225:611 2.11 

avg °F 90.30 121.20 

avg °R 550.30 581.20 

total = 54.3830 54.38 

average = 84.12 96.48 121.20 

Sample Meter Meter Stack Ges Gas 

Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume 

Inlet (°F) Outlet (°F) T Vm Vm 
Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff ^Ps Time Time 

^Ps "H 

(in H20) (in H20) (min) (24 hrs) (in H ) 9 

1400 

0.019 0.82 0.1378 3 1403 3.8 

0.02 0.86 0.1414 3 1406 4 

0.021 0.91 0.1449 3 1409 4.1 

0.022 0.95 0.1483 3 1412 4.2 

0.024 1.04 0.1549 3 1415 4.4 

0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1430 4.5 

0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1433 4.5 

0.025 1.09 0.1581 3 1436 4.5 

0.024 1.05 0.1549 3 1439 4.4 

0.024 1.06 0.1549 3 1442 4.4 

0.025 1.10 0.1581 3 1450 4.5 

0.025 1.11 0.1581 3 1453 4.5 

0.025 1.11 0.1581 3 1456 4.6 

0.024 1.07 0.1549 3 1459 4.6 

0.024 1.07 0.1549 3 1502 4.6 

0.025 1.12 0.1581 3 1508 4.6 

0.024 1.08 0.1549 3 1511 4.5 

0.025 1.13 0.1581 3 1514 4.6 

0.024 1.08 0.1549 3 1517 4.5 

0.024 1.07 0.1549 3 1520 4.5 

0.024 1.07 0.1549 3 1530 4.5 

0.025 1.12 0.1581 3 1533 4.6 

0.023 1.03 0.1517 3 1536 4.4 

0.022 0.99 0.1483 3 1539 4.3 

0.021 0.94 0.1449 3 1542 4.2 

75 75 

0.0236 1.0423 0.1534 3 1469.04 4.41 

Velocity Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum 

Head Diff "Ps Time Time 

APs AH 

~ ~~ 
Probe Filter Impinger Vs Point to 

Temperature Temperature Temperature Point 

Exit Outlet Isokinetics 

(°F) (°F) (°F) 

234 233 48 9.0374 99.35 

235 234 48 9.2642 99.54 

236 235 48 9.5011 98.59 

235 236 48 9.7164 98.47 

234 235 48 10.1571 97.22 

235 234 47 10.3577 96.82 

235 235 47 10.3666 96.88 

234 235 47 10.3666 96.86 

236 236 47 10.1484 97.29 

236 236 47 10.1571 96.12 

234 235 49 10.3666 95.81 

236 235 50 10.3577 96.32 

235 236 49 10.3577 96.39 

236 237 49 10.1571 97.49 

241 244 49 10.1571 97.10 

243 246 50 10.3577 97.90 

237 243 49 10.1222 96.72 

237 238 48 10.3487 97.17 

239 240 49 10.1484 97.07 

238 237 49 10.1571 97.54 

239 238 49 10.1484 97.16 

237 237 49 10.3577 98.15 

236 238 50 9.9347 96.74 

238 239 50 9.7080 97.60 

241 240 50 9.4930 98.82 

236.68 236.68 48.56 

Probe Exit Filter Outfet Impinger 

Temperature Temperature Temperature 

(°F) (°F) (°F) 

i ti1 
POST TEST I CALCULATION 

VOLUME DRY GAS VOLUME 1-120 VAPOR MOISTURE CONTENT 

Vm(std) = 40.3321 Vw(std) 0 5.7143 Bws = 0.1241 

Vm 54.3830 

Vm(std) = 40.3321 

Vic(mis) 121.4 

Vw(std) = 5.7143 

MOL WT DRY STACK GASE' 

Mds = 29.0632 

MOL WT WET STACK GASE: 

Mws = 27.6903 

ISOKINETIC CALCULATION 

An - 1.3690E-3 

% ISO = 97.3883 

STACK VELOCITY DRY STACK FLOW RATE 

Vs a 10.0498 

0(std) = 2.4369E+6 

Kp 85.49 

Vs = 10.0498 

PARTICULATI CONCENTRATION 

Cs = 2.1373E-3 

Mn 86.2 

Cs = 2.1373E-3 

Ibs/dscf = 4.7118E-6 

grains/dscf = 0.0330 

Ibs/hr = 11.4822 

FLUORIDE CONCElVTRATION 

Cs - 3.7687E-4 

Initial Leak Check Rate 

Finish 171.135 Pitot Tubes 

Start 171.126 A a OK 

Rate = 0.0090 B = OK 

Vac. = 20.7 

Finai Leak Check Rate Pitot Tubes 

Finish 225.941 A = OK 

Start 225.932 B = OK 

Rate = 0.0090 

Vac. a 18.6 

Mn 15.2 

Cs = 3.7687E-4 

Ibs/dscf = 8.3085E-7 

grains/dscf 0.0058 

Ibs/hr = 2.0247 

~a~- 
INLET EMISSIONS SUMMARY 

Mass Emissions Calibration Bias Data 

8.58 Zero Gas Pre (ppm) a 0.00 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.00 

8.59 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 159.90 

2.498 Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) = 160.50 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 159.10 

F~-~~ i < 

NOx (ppm) _ 

NOx (ppm bias 

correction) _ 

NOx (Ibs/hr) 

Run #3 

S02 (ppm) = 181.92 

S02 (ppm bias 

correction) = 182.29 

S02 (Ibs/hr) 73.744 

Run 43 

Zero Gas Pre (ppm) = 0.00 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) = 0.30 

Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 260.70 

Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) m 258.80 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) = 261.40 

} rp 
OUTLET EMISSiONS SUMMARY 

Mass Emisslons Caiibration Bias Data 

NOx (ppm) a 

NOx (ppm bias 

correctlon) ~ 

NOx (Ibs/hr) 

8.45 Zero Gas Pro (ppm) e 0.50 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) m 0.00 

8.25 Cal Gas Actual (ppm) = 159.90 

2.402 Cai Gas Pretest (ppm) = 161.10 

Cal Gas Post test (ppm) a 157.10 

Run #3 

S02 (ppm) e 29.36 

S02 (ppm bias 

correctlon) = 29.71 

S02 (Ibs/hr) 12.018 

Run i13 

Zero Gas Pro (ppm) = 0.30 

Zero Gas Post (ppm) a -0.20 

Cal Gas Actual (ppm) a 163.50 

Cal Gas Pretest (ppm) n 159.30 

Cai Gas Post test (ppm) a 163.40 

1a,~f, 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

LABORATORY DATA 

EPA Method 5 

~ 

Company: 

Sampling Location: 

Run Number: #-3 ~f//f f( 3 ~ 

Date: lZ ' e" 7y 

Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain 

Impinger 1 ~~' ~ ^ ~ 7. 9 % ~ 

lmpinger 2 0-11 q , 

Impinger 3 So 1~ • `~ ~ . 3 

Impinger 4 7~ - 3 

Total Gain = 

Particulate Collected 

Front - Half Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Filter and Oven Glassware) 

1. Filter Final Weight 

2. Filter Tare Weight 

3. Totai Flter Weight 

4. Particulate caught in 

nozzle, probe and glassware 

5. Total Front - Half Catch 

6 . -

p,

76- ~.~ g 

~- c 

A • d S 7 = S'7. 215 , 

~ 34 

Back - Half Analysis (Impingers, and Connecting Glassware) 

1. Particulate caught in impingers 

evaporated down at less than 

120° F. 

Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and Bacic - Half Catches) 

S~ -Z -j 

i~ 
. 

American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South 8irch Drive 

Spanish Forfc, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

Company: Date: /Z 

Source: 0~ ~, Run Number: A-, 3 

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry 

' 

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon 

Dixoide 

Carbon 

Monoxide 

' ~` ~G • ~ ~l ~ Z. S~ ~ ~. 1 

zc 

z - L/ 

Average ~v . 1p 3 16. 7 Z . ~1 ~ ~ L ~ • ~ 

`oZzo 
AMEAICAN ENVIRONMENRAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 8o 1-266-7111 

Spanish Forfc, Uffih 8assa 

POST TEST BACiC HALF EVAPORATION 

COMPANY_~,4~s~C 

SOURCE: 

DATE: 

ACFTONE BLANK 

Volume of Uquld : 

Flnal Weight 1 a 6./s mf'? 

Tare Weight /o F .ro 11 

Residue C. o o O 2. 

RUN #1 

Volume of Llquid 

Color 

Final Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue dc Blank 

- Blank 

Residue 

? 

-78f /`I 

104. . 765-3- 

~ .od'(o¢ 

RUN #2 

Volume of LJquid ?,po ... !s 

Color 

Final Weight gy, ? 

Tare Weight 1:19. 7 L 3 S^ 

Residue A Blank lo.o 2 f S" 

- Blank ip . A oo Z 

Residue O. O 2-1 S- _- 1 f• G'`- ? 

RUN 43 

Volume of Uquid 

Color 

Flnal Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank 

- Blank 

Residue 

IfJ?. Fr 7/ T 

/ D 2i, Er ¢.Sef 

o . y Zro4 

ffl.oOaZo, o z(o Z 2G•L ~ . 

) ~1 
AMERICAN ETVVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

POST TEST BAClC HALF EVAPORATION 

COMPANY: 

SOURCE: ~t4 (Gil•n 

DATE: / z 4 :;/y y 

CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER 42 

METHYLENE CHLORIDE DISTILLED WATER 

BLANK BLANK 

Volume of Llquio Z o D M/S Volume of Llqul, 3 10° "` 5 

Finai Weigtt 1 0 2 - 5, S33 Final Weigh 4? 91 . 71 G•t 

Tare Weighi / a 2•k5-3 i Taro Weighl 5• 77 6 

Residw ~.°~~ 1 Residue O.O Z 

RUN #'t RUN #1 

Volume of Liquii ~- d~ "'~ ~ Volume of Liqui, 'Z O'D r'- I S 

Colol Colol r/C r 

Final Weiglt lo Z• 2— Fnal Weigh f5• 7 66 5- 

Taro Weight l d Z' •k4 2 2

- Tare WeigM 7 G 3 / 

Residue & Blanl CO . m 0/0 Residue & Blani O.O O/e{ 

- BIanM D- O o O I - BIanM O. O O O L 

Residue y y Residue o. o o Z.... ~ 

RUN #2 RUN 42 

Volume of Llquii ~~ ~~`` 1 S Volume of LJqui, 

Coloi G Coloi 

Final WeiglT e9 S-• 21 b 2 Fnal Weigh T- S. 7 5 l r 

Taro WeigM '~ r• 2- I-S- Taro Weighi `J '~1 • 7`100 

Residue 3 Blanl co• d o l'l- Residue & Blartl D.0 0/S 

- BIanM L-7-L9 o d 1 - 81anM O. O O O Z 

Residue (D -C O Residue D• d O/.3 /. 3 ~~ 

RUN 43 RUN 43 

Volume of Uqu10 ';I ~ 

0 Volume of Liqui, 2. o O-% !s 

Colol C t e COlol G/ e — 

Final WeiglT ly- 20 4 tiO Final Weigh /O 2 - 72 4'T 

Taro Weighi moli@10ME Taro Weight !o z• sr233 

Resldue & Bianl Z) - O 4 I r Residue 8< Blani 10 • o O( Co 

- BIanM O. 0 4 d/ - BIanM f7 - 006 2- 

Residue Q• 4 O l<4 /.~.~ j Residue o. 0 0 1y /. # ~. ~ 

m 
'Va 

.. .:._3.lcS9~s~GNVe.v~ 4:_. ~_ ~ 

•- :'.~•:. •.,es. 'w~ 

00 00 •*0•00 

.•:•:':•:• ~:: Mountain States Analytical 

The Qualify Solution 

American Environmental Testing 

565 South Birch Dr. 

Spanish Fork, DT 84660 

Attn: Mr. Brett Lindsay 

Project: Interstate Brick #4 Kiln 

Sample ID: Run #1 

Matrix: Waste Water 

Results 

Test Analysis as Received 

---- -------- ------------- 

0263 Fluoride, Selective Ion Electrode 18.1 

Method: EPA 340.2 

MSAI Sample: 27756 

MSAI Group: 6751 

Date Reported: 12/12/94 

Discard Date: 01/11/95 

Date Submitted: 12/07/94 

Date Sampled: 12/05/94 

Collected by: 

Purchase Order: 

Project No.: 

Limit of 

IInits Quantitation 

----- ------------ 

mg/l 0.2 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Reviewed and Approved by: 

Mark W. Bostrom 

Project Manager 

1645 West 2200 South, Satt Lake Cily, Utah 84119 ( 801)973-0050 1-800-973-MSAI FAX (801)973-6278 

! ✓ / { M E® 
~~~~e~a~~~'~

~'a 

,t - - ~ 

~.~. a i~.z=;~..>.F. ... ~ . ~....... . rv ... -, :.. 

~ > .. ,. • ... .. ,:. ~ „ f ~ 

. 

~~

~ 

•~ 

•~•~~ 

.•:•:':•:•~ : Mountain States Anafytical 

The Quality So/utlon 

American Environmental Testing 

565. South Birch Dr. 

Spanish Fork, LTY 84660 

Attn: Mr. Brett Lindsay 

Project: Interstate Brick #4 Kiln 

Sample ID: Run #2 

Matrix: Waste Water 

Results 

Test Analysis as Received 

---- -------- ------------- 

0263 Fluoride, Selective Ion Electrode 14.2 

Method: EPA 340.2 

MSAI Sample: 27757 

MSAI Group: 6751 

Date Reported: 12/12/94 

Discard Date: 01/11/95 

Date Submitted: 12/07/94 

Date Sampled: 12/06/94 

Collected by: 

Purchase Order: 

Project No.: 

Limi t of 

Units Quantitation 

----- ------------ 

me/l 0.2 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Reviewed and Approved by: 

J ~~~~~ 

Mark W. Bostrom 

Project Manager 

1645 West 2200 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 ( 801)973-0050 1-800-973-MSAI FAX (801)973-6278 

/ V 0 M E® 
A ~a:~•.: - . . ~y~~` t~~ 

~. ~• 

•~.~• 

. :•:':•: ~:. Mountain States Anaiytical 

The Qualfty Solution 

American Environmental Testing 

565 South Birch Dr. 

Spanish Fork, UT 84660 

Attn: Mr. Brett Lindsay 

Project: Interstate Brick #4 Kiln 

Sample ID: Run #3 

Matrix: Waste Water 

Results 

Test Analysis as Received 

---- -------- ------------- 

0263 Fluoride, Selective Ion Electrode 15.2 

Method: EPA 340.2 

MSAI Sample: 27758 

MSAI Group: 6751 

Date Reported: 12/12/94 

Discard Date: 01111195 

Date Submitted: 12/07/94 

Date Sampled: 12/06/94 

Collected by: 

Purchase Order: 

Project No.: 

Limit of 

Units Quantitation 

----- ------------ 

mg/l 0.2 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Reviewed and Approved by: 

i ~ ;y y~ bi) ~ 

Mark W. Bostrom 

Project Manager 

1645 West 2200 South, SaU Lake Cily, Utah 84119 ( 801)973-0050 1-800-973-MSAI FAX (801)973-6278 

/"sL ME® 
ti`~; ~ ~ "~ a~`~W`~ k~.~.'<°•a~"~ ~ 

~"°~~.a'!•` ~ ~ ,. .u• 

•. ~~ ~~~

., ny~~w~g'~~a R}A~~4~~_c

d'~.. ° ~!',.. 3Po~~~

' d.,a^,. ,~~ ..3 .;a''- _ ~r .w ,~~ ~-~~C~r~" 

~ 

•0.-00 

~ A 

.•:•:':•:•0 :. Mountain States Analytical 

7he Quality Solution 

Test Analysis 

0263 Fluoride, Selective Ion Electrode 

Method: EPA 340.2 

MSAI Sample: 27759 

MSAI Group: 6751 

Date Reported: 12/12/94 

Discard Date: 01/11/95 

Date Submitted: 12/07/94 

Date Sampled: 12/05/94 

Collected by: 

Purchase Order: 

Project No.: 

Results • Limit of 

as Received IInits Quantitation 

------------- ----- ------------ 

. ND mg/l 0.2 

American Environmental Testing 

565 South Birch Dr. 

Spanish Fork, iJT 84660 

Attn: Mr. Brett Lindsay 

Project: Interstate Brick #4 Kiln 

Sample ID: Blank 

Matrix: Waste Water 

ND - Not detected at the limit of quantitation 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Reviewed and Approved by: 

Mark W. Bostrom 1 

Project Manager 

1645 West 2200 South, Salt Lake Cily, Utah 84119 ( 801)973-0050 1-800-973-MSAI FAX (801)973-6278 

/ V ~ ME® 
PRETEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse 

RUN #: #1 Compliance 

Pbar Pg Ts Tm 

in Hg in H20 °F °F 

25.23 -1.5 50 90 

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient 

% % % °F 

0.1 20.8 79.1 40 

total run time # of points oPavg aP1 

min in H20 in H20 

60 12 2.36 2.3 

. . 

 .. ~_ . DATE: 12J6/94 

B(ws) Al-I@ Meter 

fraction in H20 

0.02 1.748 

Cp(2) Cp(201 A) 

dimensionless dimensionless 

0.8394 0.8394 

Yi stadc area 

meter coef ft2 

0.998 0.785 

Md Mw Ps μs 

Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 

28.848 28.631 25.120 174.831 

Qs AH OH(-50) AH(+50) 

f0min in H20 in H20 in H20 

0.4482 0.557 0.685 0.462. 

Pretest Pitots 

Finish 676.02 + ok 

Start 676.018- ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 18.6 

Posttest Pitots 

Finish 704.977 + ok 

Start 704.975- ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 19 

~ 

. 
nozzle Dn oPmn oPmx 

# 

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0232 

2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0329 

3 0.3937 0.0053 0.0481 

4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0734 

5 0.3150 0.0130 0.1174 

6 0.2756 0.0223 0.1819 

7 0.2362 0.0413 0.3013 

8 0.2165 0.0797 0.4066 

9 0.1969 0.1437 0.5695 

10 0.1772 0.2515 0.8368 

11 0.15 0.5540 1.5642 

12 0.135 0.8844 2.3420 

13 'Error' •Error• 

14 'Error' 'Error• 

15 'Error` 'Error' 

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx 

in ft/sec ff/sec ft/sec ft/sec 

1 0.47 6.14 'Error' 3.07 12.58 

2 0.43 7.30 `Error' 3.65 13.87 

3 0.39 8.84 'Error' 4.42 15.56 

4 0.35 10.91 'Error' 5.46 17.84 

5 0.32 13.80 'Error' 6.90 21.04 

6 0.28 18.03 'Error' 9.02 25.77 

7 0.24 24.55 11.88 12.27 33.17 

8 0.22 29.22 17.06 14.61 38.53 

9 0.20 35.33 22.91 17.66 45.60 

10 0.18 43.62 30.30 21.81 55.27 

11 0.15 60.87 44.97 30.44 75.57 

12 0.14 75.15 56.82 37.58 92.47 

13 0.00 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 

14 0.00 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 

15 0.00 'Error• 'Error• 'Error' •Error' 

I 34 
Vmxc oPmn oPmnc aPmx APmxc An 

ft/sec in H20 in H20 in H20 in H20 ft2 

choose largest choose smallest 

9.21 'Enror' 0.0026 0.04 0.0232 1.2172E-3 

10.95 'Error' 0.0037 0.05 0.03 1.0231 E-3 

13.25 'Error' 0.0053 0.07 0.05 8.4539E-4 

16.37 'Error' 0.0082 0.09 0.07 6.8465E-4 

20.71 'Error' 0.0130 0.12 0.12 5.4119E-4 

27.05 'Error' 0.0223 0.18 0.20 4.1427E-4 

36.82 0.04 0.0413 0.30 0.37 3.0429E-4 

43.83 0.08 0.0585 0.41 0.53 2.5565E-4 

52.99 0.14 0.0855 0.57 0.77 2.1146E-4 

65.43 0.25 0.1303 0.84 1.17 1.7126E-4 

91.31 0.55 0.25 1.56 2.28 1.2272E-4 

112.73 0.88 0.39 2.34 3.48 9.9402E-5 

•Error' 'Error• 'En•or• 'Error' 'Error' 

'Error• 'Error' `En•or• 'Error' 'Error` 

'Error' 'Error• 'Error' `Error' 'Error' 

~~ 
TEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse Date: 12094 

RUN #: #1 Compliance 

START: 1120 

STOP: 1220 

point # AP(201 A) dwell act time Ts Tmo 

in H20 min decimal °F °F 

1 2.2 4.94 5 47 65 

2 2.3 5.05 5 44 68 

3 2.4 5.16 5.25 47 70 

4 2.1 4.82 5 46 73 

5 2.3 5.05 5 45 75 

6 2.2 4.94 5 46 78 

7 2 4.71 4.75 47 81 

8 2.3 5.05 5 49 83 

9 2.1 4.82 5 45 85 

10 2.3 5.05 5 43 87 

11 2.2 4.94 5 41 89 

12 2.3 5.05 5 41 90 

total 59.5 

avg 2.22 60.00 45.08 78.67 

Actual Time: 60.00 

Average Meter Temp: 84.67 

3V 
American Environmental Testing Company, lnc. 

 ' S55 South Binch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 - 

L.ABORATO RY DATA 

EPA Method 201A 

Company: -1K~,-s ~«{e ~j~~k Run Number. 

Sa mpl[ng Locatlo n: 

 .6 rr c k 

Molsture Collected 

. Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain 

Impinger 1 ,576 - 6 S76 • 8 r o. z. 

Impinger 2 +>>. 1 

Impinger 3 y Z 6•`1 yz 6-7 +- o• 3 

impinger4 + ~-i.y 

Total G = ZZ. ° ~ 

Particutate Collected 

Plrl -10 Particsbts Lauaer Than P!i -10 Particutale 

1. Filter Flnal Weight: • o.Z y Z Acet~ Wash Mg 

2. Fifter Tane Weight: o - 19 ss 'B "~ 

3. Net Fltter Wefght: -to . o o ► 7 

4. Acetone Wash Mg: / . ~ •;-s 

S. Total PM-10 Mg: ~ 3• ~^~ 

8acic 1-talf ADnlMII Total PM-1 0 Particvtat• cwh irft 

Particulate Caught In Impingers Mg. 

13 ~7 
Tmi Tov Vm vacuum AI-I SqRt OP 

°F . °F ft3 in Hg in H20 

676.075 

65 250 678.634 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

70 250 680.992 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

82 250 683.476 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

86 248 685.823 1.4 0.557 0.0000 

90 248 688.188 1.4 0.557 0.0000 

93 247. 690.573 1.4 0.557 1.4832 

96 245 692.845 1.4 0.557 1.4142 

98 243 695.235 1.4 0.557 1.5166 

100 244 697.638 1.4 0.557 1.4491 

101 241 700.048 1.4 0.557 1.5166 

103 240 702.448 1.4 0.557 1.4832 

104 243 704.869 1.4 0.557 1.5166 

28.79 

90.67 245.75 1.37 0.5570 0.8650 

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS 

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg 

mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 

22 1.04 0.04 25.23 -1.50 

ps μs Vmds (23 Mw D50 

in Hg mP ft3 ft3Jmin μm 

25.12 171.91 23.48 0.47 28.3898 9.6130 

Average Dn An Vs Iso as 

in ft2 ft/sec % 

0.135 9.9108E-5 52.24 150.18 1.2409E+5 

Total Mg Cs Cs Emr 

mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 

5.0 4.6944E-7 0.0033 0.06 

~ 3~ 
DATE: 1216/94 

B(ws) aH@ Meter 

fraction in H20 

0.02 1.748 

Cp(2) Cp(201 A) 

dimensionless dimensioniess 

0.8394 0.8394 

Y stadc area 

meter coef ft2, 

0.998 0.785 

PRETEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse 

RUN #: #2 Compliance 

Pbar Pg Ts Tm 

in Hg in H20 °F °F 

25.23 -1.5 50 90 

CO2 .02 N2 +CO Tambient 

% % % °F 

0.1 20.8 79.1 40 

total run time # of points APavg AP1 

min in H20 in H20 

60 12 2.36 2.3 

Md Mw Ps is 

Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 

28.848 28.631 25.120 174.831 

as AH AH(-50) OH(+50) 

ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 

0.4482 0.557 0.685 0.462 

Pretest Pitots 

Finish 705.056 + ok 

Start 705.054 - ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 18.6 

Posttest Pitots 

Finish 733.863 + ok 

Start 733.861 - ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 19 

A3 ~, 
nozzle Dn APmn oPmx 

~ 

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0232 

2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0329 

3 0.3937 0.0053 0.0481 

4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0734 

5 0.3150 0.0130 0.1174 

6 0.2756 0.0223 0.1819 

7 0.2362 0.0413 0.3013 

8 0.2165 0.0797 0.4066 

9 0.1969 0.1437 0.5695 

10 0.1772 0.2515 0.8368 

11 0.15 0.5540 1.5642 

12 0.135 0.8844 2.3420 

13 'Error• 'Error' 

14 'Error' 'Error' 

15 'Error' •Error' 

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx 

in ft/sec ftlsec ftlsec ft/seo 

1 0.47 6.14 'Error' 3.07 12.58 

2 0.43 7.30 'Error' 3.65 13.87 

3 0.39 8.84 'Error' 4.42 15.56 

4 0.35 10.91 'Error' 5.46 17.84 

5 0.32 13.80 'Error' 6.90 21.04 

6 0.28 18.03 'Error' 9.02 25.77 

7 0.24 24.55 11.88 12.27 33.17 

8 0.22 29.22 17.06 14.61 38.53 

9 0.20 35.33 22.91 17.66 45.60 

10 0.18 43.62 30.30 21.81 55.27 

11 0.15 60.87 44.97 30.44 75.57 

12 0.14 75.15 56.82 37.58 92.47 

13 0.00 'Error• 'Error` 'Error' •Error' 

14 0.00 'Error' 'Error' `En-or' 'Error' 

15 0.00 'Error' 'Error• 'Error• 'Error• 

AD 
Vmxc OPmn OPmnc ePmx APmxc An 

fUsec in H20 in H20 in H20 in H20 ft2 

choose largest choose smallest 

9.21 'Error' 0.0026 0.04 0.0232 12172E-3 

10.95 'Error' 0.0037 0.05 0.03 1.0231 E-3 

13.25 'Error' 0.0053 0.07 0.05 8.4539E-4 

16.37 'Error' 0.0082 0.09 0.07 6.8465E-4 

20.71 'Error' 0.0130 0.12 0.12 5.4119E-4 

27.05 `Error' 0.0223 0.18 0.20 4.1427E-4 

36.82 0.04 0.0413 0.30 0.37 3.0429E-4 

43.83 0.08 0.0585 0.41 0.53 2.5565E-4 

52.99 0.14 0.0855 0.57 0.77 2.1146E-4 

65.43 0.25 0.1303 0.84 1.17 1.7126E-4 

91.31 0.55 0.25 1.56 2.28 1.2272E-4 

112.73 0.88 0.39 2.34 3.48 9.9402E-5 

'Error• 'Error• 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 

•Error• 'Error' 'Error' •Error' 'Error' 

'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 

~~1 
TEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201 A 

TEST S1TE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse Date: 12/6/94 

RUN #: #2 Compliance 

START: 1310 

STOP: 1410 

point # AP(201A) dweil act time Ts Tmo 

in H20 min decimal °F °F 

1 2.3 4.94 5 45 87 

2 2.2 4.83 5 47 87 

3 2.3 4.94 5 50 87 

4 2 4.60 4.75 50 88 

5 2.4 5.04 5 49 89 

6 2.3 4.94 5 51 90 

7 2.1 4.72 4.75 50 93 

8 2.2 4.83 5 50 94 

9 2 4.60 4.75 51 95 

10 2.2 4.83 5 50 96 

11 2.3 4.94 5 52 97 

12 2.2 4.83 - 5 53 97 

total 58.0 

avg 2.21 59.25 49.83 91.67 

Actual Time: 59.25 

Average Meter Temp: 96.54 

I ~ 2" 
Tmi Tov Vm vacuum NH SqRt AP 

°F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 

705.136 

87 245 707.546 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

90 248 709.933 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

94 251 712.341 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

98 250 714.614 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

101 246 717.021 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

103 248 719.458 1.3 0.557 1.5166 

105 243 721.744 1.4 0.557 1.4491 

107 250 724.174 1.4 0.557 1.4832 

108 244 726.487 1.4 0.557 1.4142 

108 244 728.922 1.4 0.557 1.4832 

108 245 731.347 1.4 0.557 1.5166 

108 247 733.785 1.4 0.557 1.4832 

28.65 

101.42 246.75 1.35 0.5570 0.8622 

POSTTEST CALCIJLATIONS 

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg 

mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 

19.1 0.90 0.04 25.23 -1.50 

Ps μs Vmds as Mw D50 

in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min μm 

25.12 173.47 22.86 0.46 28.4376 9.7539 

Average Dn An Vs Iso as 

in ft2 ft/sec % 

0.135 9.9108E-5 52.27 148.70 1.2357E+5 

Total Mg Cs Cs Emr 

mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 

4.7 4.5318E-7 0.0032 0.06 

/W-3 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

` ' 565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

LJIBORATO RY DATA 

EPA Method 201 A 

Company: fc , ~. ~, u~ ~f Run Number. ~~ ~ 

 a»~,~ P Q„e,~ 

Sampiing Location: (y - Date: 6- q y 

inittal Weight 

..5- 1 

Finai Weight Weight Galn 

,Z 

filZ• ~1 

t' O - l 

Impinger 1 ° 

Impinger 2 

Impinger 3 

Impinger 4 

,~- 76 , >. 

7z0 • f 

ss-3. ~ 

7?4, . 2 

Tota I Ga in 

Particuiate Collected 

Laryer Tian PU -10 Particudale 

Acetone Wash Mg 

[' ii — - 

1. Fitter Final Weight: • o. I 9 7 6 

2. Fifter Tare Weight: o- / 9 so ,6- Z 

3. Net Filter Weight: a.0 0 / b - 

 /. 6 ..-

~ 

4. Acetone Wash Mg: /• ~~ 

S. Tota 1 PM-10 Mg: 3 •~~' ~ 

ftcic liatt Analrsl ~ • ' ~ ;c. - - - ~` -- i = 

- Particulate Caught in Impingers Mg. 

lr• 7 4'`7 

IqA 
B(ws) eH@ Meter 

fraction in H20 

0.02 1.748 

Cp(2) Cp(201 A) 

dimensionless dimensionless 

0.8394 0.8394 

Y stadc area 

meter coef ft2 

0.998 0.785 

PRETEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201 A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse 

RUN #: #3 Compliance 

Pbar Pg Ts Tm 

in Hg in H20 °F °F 

25.23 -1.5 50 90 

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient 

% % % °F 

0.1 20.8 79.1 40 

total run time # of points APavg AP1 

min in H20 in H20 

60 12 2.36 2.3 

DATE: 12/6194 

Md Mw Ps μs 

Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 

28.848 28.631 25.120 174.831 

as AH AH(-50) oH(+50) 

ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 

0.4482 0.557 0.685 0.462 

Pretest Pitots 

Finish 734.234 + ok 

Start 734.232- ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 18.2 

Posttest Pitots 

Finish 763.425 + ok 

Start 763.423 - ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 19 

~~~ 
nozzle Dn APmn OPmx 

# 

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0232 

2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0329 

3 0.3937 0.0053 0.0481 

4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0734 

5 0.3150 0.0130 0.1174 

6 0.2756 0.0223 0.1819 

7 0.2362 0.0413 0.3013 

8 0.2165 0.0797 0.4066 

9 0.1969 0.1437 0.5695 

10 0.1772 0.2515 0.8368 

11 0.15 0.5540 1.5642 

12 0.135 0.8844 2.3420 

13 'Error• •Error' 

14 •Error' •Error' 

15 'Error' •Error` 

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx 

in ft/sec fUsec fvsec fVsec 

1 0.47 6.14 'Error' 3.07 12.58 

2 0.43 7.30 'Error' 3.65 13.87 

3 0.39 8.84 'Error' 4.42 15.56 

4 0.35 10.91 'Error' 5.46 17.84 

5 0.32 13.80 'Error' 6.90 21.04 

6 0.28 18.03 *Error' 9.02 25.77 

7 0.24 24.55 11.88 12.27 33.17 

8 0.22 29.22 17.06 14.61 38.53 

9 0.20 35.33 22.91 17.66 45.60 

10 0.18 43.62 30.30 21.81 55.27 

11 0.15 60.87 44.97 30.44 75.57 

12 0.14 75.15 56.82 37.58 92.47 

13 0.00 *Error• *Error' *Error• *Error' 

14 0.00 'Error• •Error' 'Error• 'Error• 

15 0.00 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' •Error• 
Vmxc 

ff/sec 

9.21 

10.95 

13.25 

16.37 

20.71 

27.05 

36.82 

43.83 

52.99 

65.43 

91.31 

112.73 

'Error' 

'Error• 

'Error' 

oPmn oPmnc 

in H20 in H20 

choose largest 

'Error• 0.0026 

•Error• 0.0037 

'Error' 0.0053 

'Error' 0.0082 

'Error' 0.0130 

'Error' 0.0223 

0.04 0.0413 

0.08 0.0585 

0.14 0.0855 

0.25 0.1303 

0.55 0.25 

0.88 0.39 

'Error• `Error• 

•Error' •Error' 

'Error• `Error' 

OPmx APmxc 

in H20 in H20 

choose smallest 

0.04 0.0232 

0.05 0.03 

0.07 0.05 

0.09 0.07 

0.12 0.12 

0.18 0.20 

0.30 0.37 

0.41 0.53 

0.57 o.77 

0.84 1.17 

1.56 2.26 

2.34 3.48 

'Error• 'Error' 

'Error• 'Error' 

'Error' 'Error• 

An 

ft2 

1.2172E-3 

1.0231 E-3 

8.4539E-4 

6.8465E-4 

5.4119E-4 

4.1427E-4 

3.0429E-4 

2.5565E-4 

2.1146E-4 

1.7126E-4 

1.2272E-4 

9.9402E-5 

~T~ 
TEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201 A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick Primary Crusher Baghouse Date: 12/6/94 

RUN #: #3 Compliance 

START: 1500 

STOP: 1016 

point # aP(201 A) dwell aci time Ts Tmo 

in H20 min decimal °F °F 

1 2.2 4.94 5 50 89 

2 2.3 5.05 5 51 89 

3 2.4 5.16 5.25 52 89 

4 2.1 . 4.82 5 52 90 

5 2.3 5.05 5 52 90 

6 2.2 . 4.94 5 52 92 

7 2 4.71 4.75 52 93 

8 2.3 5.05 5 50 94 

9 2,2 4.94 5 51 95 

10 2.1 4.82 5 52 96 

11 2.2 4.94 5 51 97 

12 2.3 5.05 5 51 98 

total 59.4 

avg 2.22 60.00 51.33 92.67 

Actual T'ime: 60.00 

Average Meter Temp: 97.29 

I~~ 
Tmi Tov Vm vacuum oH SqRt AP 

°F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 

734.314 

89 244 736.732 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

91 251 739.126 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

96 251 741.664 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

99 247 743.947 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

98 249 746.483 1.3 0.557 0.0000 

104 248 748.891 1.3 0.557 1.4832 

105 250 751.187 1.4 0.557 1.4142 

106 249 753.609. 1.4 0.557 1.5166 

108 248 756.029 1.4 0.557 1.4832 

108 248 758.442 1.4 0.557 1.4491 

109 251 760.867 1.4 0.557 1.4832 

110 250 763.297 1.4 0.557 1.5166 

28.98 

101.92 248.83 1.35 0.5570 0.8622 

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS 

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg 

mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 

15.7 0.74 0.03 25.23 -1.50 

Ps μs Vmds as Mw D50 

in Hg mp fq fq/min μm 

25.12 174.36 23.10 0.46 28.5117 9.8353 

Average Dn An Vs Iso Cs 

in ft2 fvsec % dscFh 

0.135 9.9108E-5 52.28 147.72 1.2411 E+5 

Total AAg Cs Cs Emr 

mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 

5.3 5.0582E-7 0.0035 0.06 

//5~ 
1. Fiiter Finai Weight: • 0.2 0 5~ (- 

2. Fitter Tane Weight: o• z o 6 y 9-3 

3. Net Fifter Weight: o- 0 OL Z L.-. ~ 

4. Acetone Wash Mg: /. 7 •^•s 

S. Total PM-10 Mg: ?-r7 r ) 

Larger Than PU -10 Rirttciiaft 

Acetone/Wash Mg 

American Environmenta! Testing Company, Inc. 

 • 565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

LkBORATORY DATA 

EPA Method 201A 

Company: ~'~ ~~siafe. 6,-? e-k Run Number. #~3 Co,. P/. ~ n~ t 

Sampling Location: A6 r ~ ,- k Cru .sk=r D$te: 

8 41 d.& &" t 

MQisture Collected 

. InitEai Weight Finai Weight Weight Galn 

impinger 1 6 L4 

Impinger2 3'~ a• 3 Syo • 5 

Impinger 3 `fzG• 6 L(2.1. 9 

Impinger 4 •72 6 • 2 -j L( ! • 

Total Gain = r+ 1S• 7 

Particutate Coitected 

Batic Ha)f Mahrsis 

,~— 

- Particuiate Caught in Impingers Mg. 

. /- ~ rs 

57. 
American Environmental Testing ComQany, Inc. 

565 So uth Birch D rive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84650 

(801) 266-7111 

Company: v ~ Cd Date: _ l z - 6 - fy 

Source:Al~ &9 &,az Run Number: ,d / - Z -t 3 

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry 

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon 

Dixoide 

Cartion 

INonoxide 

f -7q. I Z o, ®' 0 ~ 

z -~ f. Zv.$ D- ~ Lo.ol 

3 ~~, ~ Za .6 4v ' ° ( 

Average 

~ ~l•~ 20 . 8 d . ~ G v•0( 

AS/ 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive so 1-2ss-7111 

Spanish Foric, Utah $4660 

POST TEST BACK HALF EVAPORATION 

COMPANY:-~ :ee- < < t 

SOURCE: ,O~, Z 

DATE: 

~ vG • frmi 2 

t0 .Q 00 L 

L 

ioZ.?Sf2t~ 

7 -7~4 

,r~ . 0 0 Z. t • 

o .aooZ 

A ETONE BLANK 

- Volume of Uquid 

Finai Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue 

RUN #1 

Volume of Uquid 

Color 

Final Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue dc Blank 

- Blank 

Residue 

RUN #2 

Volume of Uquid 

Color 

Final Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank 

- Blank 

Residue 

C.Cc.~ 

tob. 

~~~• ~ i ¢7 

/ 7 

p 

mS- /- S "} 

_ RUN #3 

Volume of Uquid 

Color 

Final Weight 

Tare Weight 

Resldue 8 Blank 

- Blank 

Residue 

"1,100 co ..... L S. 

Gi z— 

9't to 17 

fr0 o ~ 

o o 1 .y 

tJ '100a 

O .o O /7 

1{a 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 

POST TEST BACK HALF EVAPORATION 

COMPANY: ~•'~"r3'b`{~- '3"

` c' L 

SOURCE: P(' ~•w--~ cn- i Lc ~ i3 ~s ~

,.... K 

DATE: I'L 4 ` 1,7 

CONTAINEA #1 CONTAINER #2 

METHYLENE CHLORIDE DISTILL.ED WATEFI 

BLANK BLANK 

Volume ot Llquio ~~ °"" Volume of Liqub 

Final Weigir /° s. ~ S3 3 Finai Weigh 1 7, 7 7 L.0 

Tare Weight l9 2-• 1r s3 L- Tare Weight ~l7- 7 7 F"~ 

Residue o• ~ / Residue d• o 0 o L 

RUN #1 RUN #1 

Voiume ot Liquii LS Voiume of Liquic -2 d O r" f S 

Coloi Coloe c t'C .r 

Final Weiglr ~5. ~i ~t ~ r Finai Weigh 1 ,0 G• 7 7 3 t 

Taro Weight `~ 5 ~O y? ~ Tare ' Weight / O(-.'7 7 Z/ 

Residue b Blanl 0 • D ~ fl , Residue & Blanl D• C &/ O 

- BIanM 6. O O d 1 - Blanli .o Oo z 

Residue C • D D O(o B • a~ Residue O- OOO 8- 0.`6- Ga- S 

RUN #2 

Volume of Liquio 

Coiol G tG~ 

Final Weigtr 2 

Taro Weight Z 

Residue if Blani t!:) . O O D Fs 

- BIanM D O I 

Residue 9. O d:> O •7 

RUN #3 

Volume of Liquit i S 

Colof 

Final Weigir 91-- 1?0 

Tare Weighi ?$• 197#- 

Residue b Blanl O.O D O(lo 

- BIanM 0- o O a 1 

Residue O . o O0 ~ 

RUN #2 

Voiume of Liqub 

CClol 

Final Weigh 

Taro WeigM 

Residue & Blanl 

- BIanM 

O • ~ '`" 3 Residue 

RUN #3 

Volume of Liqui, 

Coloi 

Fnal Weigh 

Tare WeigN 

Residue 3c Blani 

- BIanM 

0. 5- A-7 Residue 

7-6 C) 

( tG r' 

i0G • 67 7 ) 

/o `•G7(.eL 

co.d>oI! 

O. ~ OOL 

o.Doo 7 p,el 

Z 

ft'21 / 

C~ ,•DOOZ 

~C~~ 
PRETEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201 A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC#3 Baghouse DATE: 1215/94 

RUN #: #1 Compliance 

Pbar Pg Ts Tm B(ws) A!-I@ Meter 

in Hg in H20 °F °F fraction in H20 

25.32 -9 52 85 0.02 1.849 

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient Cp(2) Cp(201 A) 

% % % °F dimensionless dimensionless 

0.2 20.5 79.3 48 0.8414 0.8414 

total run time # of points aPavg oP1 Y stacfc area 

min in H20 in H20 meter coef ft2 

60 12 0.36 0.35 1.085 1.9174 

Md Mw Ps μa 

Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 

28.852 28.63496 24.6582 175.1882 

as eH oH(-50) nH(+50) 

ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 

0.4521 0.5661 0.6953 0.4699 

Pretest Pitots 

Finish 453.972 + ok 

Start 453.968 - ok 

0.004 

Vacuum 19.5 

Posttest Pitots 

Finish 476.138 + ok 

Start 476.135 - ok 

0.003 

Vacuum 18.9 

~5~ 
nozzie Dn APmn pPmx 

# 

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0230 

2 0.4331 0.0036 0.0325 

3 0.3937 0.0053 0.0477 

4 0.3543 0.0081 0.0727 

5 0.3150 0.0129 0.1163 

6 0.2756 0.0220 0.1798 

7 0.2362 0.0409 0.2979 

8 0.2165 0.0795 0.4022 

9 0.1969 0.1428 0.5635 

10 0.1772 0.2495 0.8281 

11 0.15 0.5492 1.5483 

12 0.135 0.8765 2.3184 

13 'Error' 'Error' 

14 'Error' 'Error' 

15 'Error' 'Error' 

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx 

in fvsec fvsec ft/sec fvsec 

1 0.47 6.19 'Error' 3.10 12.66 

2 0.43 7.37 'Error' 3.68 13.96 

3 0.39 8.91 'Error' 4.46 15.67 

4 0.35 11.01 'Error' 5.50 17.97 

5 0.32 13.92 `Error' 6.96 21.20 

6 0.28 18.19 'Error` 9.09 25.97 

7 0.24 24.76 12.07 12.38 33.43 

8 0.22 29.47 17.26 14.74 38.84 

9 0.20 35.63 23.15 17.82 45.97 

10 0.18 44.00- 30.59 22.00 55.73 

11 0.15 61.40 45.39 30.70 76.21 

12 0.14 75.80 57.34 37.90 93.25 

13 0.00 `Error• 'Error` `Error` `Error• 

14 0.00 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 

15 0.00 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error•. 

/J?r 
Vmxc OPmn OPmnc 

ft/sec in H20 in H20 

choose largest 

9.29 'Error' 0.0026 

11.05 'En•or' 0.0036 

13.37 'Error' 0.0053 

16.51 'Error' 0.0081 

20.88 'Error' 0.0129 

27.28 'Error' 0.0220 

37.14 0.04 0.0409 

44.21 0.08 0.0579 

53.45 0.14 0.0846 

66.00 0.25 0.1290 

92.10 0.55 0.25 

113.70 0.88 0.38 

'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 

'Error` 'Enror' 'Error` 

'Error' 'Error' 'Error` 

oPmx OPmxc 

in H20 in H20 

choose smallest 

0.04 0.0230 

0.05 0.03 

0.07 0.05 

0.09 0.07 

0.12 0.12 

0.18 0.20 

0.30 0.37. 

0.40 0.52 

0.56 0.76 

0.83 1.16 

1.55 2.26 

2.32 3.45 

'Error' 'Error' 

'Error' 'Error' 

`Error' 'Error' 

An 

ft2 

1.2172E-3 

1.0231 E-3 

8.4539E-4 

6.8465E-4 

5.4119E-4 

4.1427E-4 

3.0429E-4 

2.5565E-4 

2.1146E-4 

1.7126E-4 

1.2272E-4 

9.9402E-5 

~ 

~~ 
TEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201 A 

TEST SiTE: Interstate Brick DC#3 Baghouse Date: 12/5194 

RUN #: #1 Compliance 

Start 1200 

Stop 1315 

point # AP(201 A) dwell act time Ts Tmo 

in H20 min decimal °F °F 

1 0.35 4.93 500 53 57 

2 0.55 6.18 615 56 57 

3 0.53 6.07 600 56 58 

4 0.13 3.00 300 58 59 

5 0.11 2.76 245 57 59 

6 0.1 2.64 245 57 60 

7 0.95 8.12 800 62 62 

8 0.66 6.77 645 63 62 

9 0.68 6.87 645 63 63 

10 0.11 2.76 245 64 63 

11 0.09 2.50 230 64 63 

12 0.08 2.36 215 65 64 

total 55.0 

avg 0.36 5285.00 59.83 60.58 

Actual Time: 54.75 

Average Meter Temp: 59.54 

IL37 
Tmi Tov Vm vacuum AH SqRt aP 

°F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 

'454.052 

58 245 4.1 0.5661 0.5916 

58 253 4.1 0.5661 0.7416 

59 254 4.1 0.5661 0.7280 

59 242 4.1 0.5661 0.3606 

60 238 4.1 0.5661 0.3317 

60 241 . 464.139 4.1 0.5661 0.3162 

58 248 4.1 0.5661 0.9747 

57 256 4.1 0.5661 0.8124 

58 255 4.1 0.5661 0.8246 

58 252 4.1 0.5661 0.3317 

58 257 4.1 0.5661 0.3000 

59 254 476.06 4.1 0.5661 0.2828 

22.008 

58.50 249.58 4.10 0.5661 0.5497 

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS 

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg 

mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 

8.9 0.42 0.02 25.32 -9.00 

Ps μs Vmds Gs Mw DSO 

in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min μm 

24.66 177.22 20.53 0.46 28.6350 10.0326 

Average Dn An V9 Iso as 

in ft2 fVsec % 

0.1830 1.8265E-4 33.92 123.18 1.9210E+5 

Tota! AAg Cs Ca Emr 

mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 

5.2 5.5844E-7 0.0039 0.11 

~~~ 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

5b5 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

LIBORATORY DATJ1 

EPA Method 201A 

_ 

Company: ~—,a ~.~ ~ ~ Run Number: fz 

Sampiing Location: Date: 

Initial YVeight 

Impinger 1 '~~ "? 

Impinger 2 G a 7. .1 

Impinger 3 y37. 7 

Impinger 4 . Z.3 7 / 

Moisture Collecied 

Final Weight 

say a 

~a~ a 

~ys a 

Weight Gain 

J. a 

A / 

O :S 

6./ 

Tota I Ga in 

Particulate Caitected 

-_10 Particubt+e Larger Than Plrl -10 Particvlaie 

1. Fiiter Final YVeight:O/y 7&— Acetone Wash Mg 

2. Fiiter Tare 1Neight:O. / 9S7 , 

1 

3. Net Filter Weight:D. Dy / S.' ~ • Y``7 

4. Acetone Wash Mg: ~• / ~- ~ 

S. Total PM-10 Mg: 

I-~.--L=--i ~ ~ ~' ► Total P164-10 PartiwEate Catclf Ata 

Particulate Caught In impingers Mg. 

/. 3 r ? S^ .z---) 

/J71

~ 
PRETEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC #3 Baghouse 

RUN #: #2 Compliance 

Pbar Pg Ts Tm 

in Hg in H20 °F °F 

25.3 -9 59 80 

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient 

% % 9'e °F 

0.2 20.5 79.3 50 

total run time # of points oPavg aP1 

min in H20 in H20 

60 12 0.36 0.35 

DATE: 1215194 

B(ws) dH@ Meter 

fraction in H20 

0.02 1.849 

Cp(2) . Cp(201 A) 

dimensionless dimensionless 

0.8414 0.8414 

Y stack area 

meter coef ft2 

1.085 1.9174 

Md Mw Ps }is 

Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib moie in Hg micropoise 

28.852 28.63496 24.6382 176.9997 

as AH AH(-50) AH(+50) 

ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 

0.4587 0.5615 0.6876 0.4672 

Pretest Pitots 

Finish 476.349 + ok 

Start 476.344 - ok 

0.005 

Vacuum 20 

Posttest Pitots 

Finish 499.1 + ok 

Start 499.098 - ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 19.2 

41 
nozzte Dn oPmn oPmx 

# 

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0233 

2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0330 

3 0.3937 0.0054 0.0484 

4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0737 

5 0.3150 0.0131 0.1180 

6 0.2756 0.0224 0.1822 

7 0.2362 0.0415 0.3021 

8 0.2165 0.0810 0.4079 

9 0.1969 0.1453 0.5715 

10 0.1772 0.2536 0.8399 

11 0.15 0.5577 1.5707 

12 0.135. 0.8899 2.3522 

13 'Error' •Error 

14 'Error' 'Error 

15 •Error •Error 

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx 

in ivsec ft/sec ft/sec fvsec 

1 0.47 6.28 'Error' 3.14 12.83 

2 0.43 7.47 •Error' 3.74 14.15 

3 0.39 9.04 'Error 4.52 15.88 

4 0.35 11.17 'Error 5.58 18.21 

5 0.32 14.13 'Error 7.06 21.49 

6 0.28 18.45 •Error' 9.23 26.33 

7 0.24 25.12 12.30 12.56 33.90 

8 0.22 - 29.91 17.55 14.95 39.40 

9 0.20 36.16 23.51 18.08 46.63 

10 0.18 44.64 31.06 22.32 56.54 

11 0.15 62.30 46.07 31.15 77.31 

12 0.14 76.91 58.19 38.46 94.61 

13 0.00 'Error' 'Error 'Error' 'Error' 

14 0.00 'Error• •Error• 'Error• 'En•or• 

15 0.00 'En•or' •Error 'Error• 'En•or' 

AV 
Vmxc oPmn oPmnc OPmx APmxc An 

ft/sec in H20 in H20 in H20 in H20 ft2 

choose largest choose smallest 

9.42 'Error' 0.0026 0.04 0.0233 1.2172E-3 

11.21 'Error' 0.0037 0.05 0.03 1.0231 E-3 

13.57 'Error' 0.0054 0.07 0.05 8.4539E-4 

16.75 'Error' 0.0082 0.09 0.07 6.8465E-4 

21.19 `Error` 0.0131 0.12 0.12 5.4119E-4 

27.68 *Error' 0.0224 0.18 0.20 4.1427E-4 

37.69 0.04 0.0415 0.30 0.37 3.0429E-4 

44.86 0.08 0.0588 0.41 0.53 2.5565E-4 

54.23 0.15 0.0859 0.57 0.77 2.1146E-4 

66.96 0.25 0.1309 0.84 1.18 1.7126E-4 

93.45 0.56 0.25 1.57 2.29 1.2272E-4 

115.37 0.89 0.39 2.35 3.50 9.9402E-5 

*Error• 'Error' *Error• 'Error' 'Error' 

'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 

'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 'Error• 

I ~a- 
TEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201 A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Bricic DC #3 Baghouse Date: 12/5J94 

RllN #: #2 Compliance 

Start 1410 

Stop 1525 

point # oP(201 A) dwell act time Ts Tmo 

in H20 min decimal °F °F 

1 0.35 4.93 5 56 65 

2 0.56 6.24 6.25 57 65 

3 0.53 6.07 6 58 66 

4 0.16 3.33 3.25 59 65 

5 0.13 3.00 3 57 66 

6 0.11 2.76 2.75 56 66 

7 0.92 7.99 8 55 66 

8 0.62 6.56 6.5 56 66 

9 0.7 6.97 7 54 66 

10 0.11 2.76 2.75 52 67 

11 0.11 2.76 2.75 52 66 

12 0.1 2.64 2.75 53 66 

totai 56.0 

avg 0.37 56.00 55.42 65.83 

Actual Time: 56.00 

Average Meter Temp: 65.92 

//4~3 
Tmi Tov Vm vacuum OH SqRt OP 

°F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 

476.432 

65 232 4.2 0.5615 0.5916 

66 251 4.2 0.5615 0.7483 

66 245 4.2 0.5615 0.7280 

65 250 4.2 0.5615 0.4000 

67 253 4.2 0.5615 0.3606 

67 249 487.188 4.2 0.5615 0.3317 

66 245 4.1 0.5615 0.9592 

66 253 4.1 0.5615 0.7874 

66 260 4.1 0.5615 0.8367 

66 261 4.1 0.5615 0.3317 

66 258 4.1 0.5615 0.3317 

66 255 499.018 4.1 0.5615 0.3162 

22.586 

66.00 251.00 4.15 0.5615 0.5602 

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS 

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg 

mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 

6.5 0.31 0.01 25.3 -9.00 

Ps μs Vmds Os Mw D50 

in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min μm 

24.64 176.48 20.80 0.45 28.6947 10.1464 

Average Dn An Vs Iso Qa. 

in ft2 ft/sec % 

0.1830 1.8265E-4 34.41 118.69 1.9745E+5 

Total Mg Cs Cs Emr 

mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 

3.5 3.7104E-7 0.0026 0.07 

I (o ~ 
American Environrnentai Tes'~ing Company, Inc. 

565 So uth Birch D rive 

Spanish ForK Utah 84600 

(801) 2t;6-7111 

LABORATaRY DATA 

EPA Method 5 

Company: Run Number:Oo? 

Sampiing Location: --m4a-e, Date: ~S~s% 

Moisture Coilec;ed 

Inittai Weight Fina1 Weight Weight Gain 

Impinger 1 Sa`/. a ~. D• G 

Impinger 2 ~~9. / C3e-1 3' I.7 

Impinger 3 4139. O 

Impinger 4 75CS / 7y ei . 

Total Ga1n 

Particuiate Coflected 

Front - Halt Analysis (Nozzie, Probe, Fitier and Oven Grassvrare) 

1. Filter FinallNeight 

2. Filter Tare YYeight 

3. Total Filter Weight 

4. Partkviate caught In 

nozzle, prabe and gfassware 

S. Total Front - Haft Catch 

0. /y99 

o • /ggs 

a.000y = o.4-&-n 

~ . 3 ,..~ 

Back - Halt Analysis (Impingera, and Connecting Gfassware) 

1. Partkutate caught in impingera 

evaporated down at teis than 

12d' F. 

Totai Particufate Catch (Sum of Front and Back - Halt Catches) 

-3 . 5- .n 

141-1 ~ 
PRETEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201 A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC #3 Baghouse 

RUN #: #3 Compliance 

Pbar Pg Ts Tm 

in Hg in H20 °F °F 

25.26 -9 52 70 

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient 

% % % °F 

0.2 20.5 79.3 40 

total run time # of points oPavg oP1 

min in H20 in H20 

60 12 - 0.36 0.35 

DATE: 12094 

B(ws) AH@ Meter 

fraction in H20 

0.02 1.849 

Cp(2) Cp(201 A) 

dimensionless dimensionless 

0.8414 0.8414 

Yi stadc area 

meter coef ft2 

1.085 1.9174 

Md Mw Ps μs 

Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 

28.852 28.63496 24.5982 175.1882 

as I&H AH(-50) oH(+50) 

ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 

0.4524 0.5500 0.6754 0.4565 

Pretest Pitots 

Finish 499.309 + ok 

Start 499.305 - ok 

0.004 

Vacuum 20.2 

Posttest Pitots 

Finish 521.686 + ok 

Start 521.684- ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 18 

I~~ 
nozzle Dn APmn APmx 

# 

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0230 

2 0.4331 0.0036 0.0325 

3 0.3937 0.0053 0.0476 

4 0.3543 0.0081 0.0726 

5 0.3150 0.0129 0.1162 

6 0.2756 0.0220 0.1795 

7 0.2362 0.0408 0.2976 

8 0.2165 0.0794 0.4018 

9 0.1969 0.1428 0.5629 

10 0.1772 0.2494 0.8272 

11 0.15 0.5487 1.5466 

12 0.135 0.8757 2.3160 

13 'Error' •Error• 

14 'Error' 'Error' 

15 'Error• •Error' 

Dn Vn Vmn Vmna Vmx 

in ft/sec fUsec fUsec fUsec 

1 0.47 6.20 •Error` 3.10 12.67 

2 0.43 7.37 'Error' 3.69 13.97 

3 0.39 8.92 'Error' 4.46 15.67 

4 0.35 11.01 'Error' 5.51 17.98 

5 0.32 13.93 'En•or' 6.97 21.21 

6 0.28 18.20 'Error' 9.10 25.98 

7 0.24 24.78 12.09 12.39 33.45 

8 0.22 29.50 17.28 14.75 38.87 

9 0.20 35.66 23.17 17.83 46.00 

10 0.18 44.03 30.62 22.01 55.77 

11 0.15 61.44 45.42 30.72 76.26 

12 . 0.14 75.86 57.38 37.93 93.32 

13 0.00 'Error` 'Error' `Error' 'Error' 

14 0.00 •Error' •Error' •Error• •Error' 

15 0.00 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 'Error• 

A~O 7 
Vmxc aPmn oPmnc OPmx oPmxc An 

ft/sec in H20 in H20 in H20 in H20 ft2 

choose largest choose smallesi 

9.29 'Error' 0.0026 0.04 0.0230 1.2172E-3 

11.06 'Error` 0.0036 0.05 0.03 1.0231 E-3 

13.38 'Error' 0.0053 0.07 0.05 8.4539E-4 

16.52 'Error' 0.0081 0.09 0.07 6.8465E-4 

20.90 'Error' 0.0129 0.12 0.12 5.4119E-4 

27.30 'Error• 0.0220 0.18 0.20 4.1427E-4 

37.17 0.04 0.0408 0.30 0.37 3.0429E-4 

44.24 0.08 0.0578 0.40 0.52 2.5565E-4 

53.49 0.14 0.0845 0.56 0.76 2.1146E-4 

66.04 0.25 0.1289 0.83 1.16 1.7126E-4 

92.17 0.55 0.25 1:55 2.26 1.2272E-4 

113.79 0.88 0.38 2.32 3.44 9.9402E-5 

'Error' `Error' 'Error• 'Error' 'Error' 

'Error' 'Error• 'Error• 'Error` 'Error' 

•Error' *Error• 'Error' 'Error' *Error• 

I ~~ 
TEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201 A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC #3 Baghouse Date: 12/6/94 

RUN #: #3 Compliance 

Start 910 

Stop 1028 

point # oP(201A) dwell act time Ts Tmo 

in H20 min decimal °F °F 

1 0.35 4.93 5 42 58 

2 0.57 6.29 6.25 45 59 

3 0.54 6.12 6 49 59 

4 0.2 3.73 3.75 52 60 

5 0.13 3.00 3 53 61 

6 0.12 2.89 3 54 61 

7 0.95 8.12 8 51 63 

8 0.68 6.87 6.75 50 63 

9 0.15 3.23 3.25 52 64 

10 0.1 2.64 2.75 52 64 

11 0.11 2.76 2.75 51 64 

12 0.13 3.00 3 52 65 

total 53.6 

avg 0.34 53.50 50.25 61.75 

Actual T'ime: 53.50 

Average Meter Temp: 62.04 

/6~, 
Tmi Tov Vm vacuum OH SqRt oP 

°F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 

499.386 

57 245 3.8 0.5505 0.5916 

59 256 3.8 0.5505 0.7550 

60 244 3.8 0.5505 0.7348 

61 245 4 0.5505 0.4472 

62 244 4 0.5505 0.3606 

62 248 510.243 3.9 0.5505 0.3464 

63 253 3.8 0.5505 0.9747 

64 249 3.8 0.5505 0.8246 

64 251 3.8 0.5505 0.3873 

65 249 3.9 0.5505 0.3162 

65 252 3.8 0.5505 0.3317 

66 254 521.555 3.8 0.5505 0.3606 

22.169 

62.33 249.17 3.85 0.5505 0.5359 

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS 

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg 

mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 

6.5 0.31 0.01 25.26 -9.00 

Ps μs Vmds as Mw D50 

in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min μm 

24.60 175.13 20.53 0.46 28.6927 9.8995 

Average Dn An Vs Iso as 

in ft2 fvsec % 

0.1830 1.8265E-4 32.78 127.71 1.8964E+5 

Total Mg Cs Cs Emr 

mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 

2.7 2.8993E-7 0.0020 0.05 

1 I~ 
. 

American Environinental Tes:ing Cornpany, Inc_ 

565 So uth 8irch D rive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 2E6-7111 

LA84Ft1TaHY DATA 

EPA Methcd 5 

Company: .. t,_ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~Run Number: -Or5! 

Sampiing Location: L-2:~ :~ .~~~•/~~~b, Date: Z- - iy 

Moisture Collected 

Initial lilteight Final Weight Vlteight Gain 

lmpinger 1 So'?r) ,o I O. 1 

lmpinger 2 63Q 9• 'V' 

Impinger 3 3~ • 

Impinger 4 

Total Gain = 

Particuiate Ccllec!ed 

Ftont - Hait Anatysis (Nozzle, ProL^e, Fiiter and Oven Gtassware) 

-O. i 

,6 . .5-..,Z 

1. Fitter Final Weight 

2. Fifter Tare Weight 

3. Total Fiiter Weight 

4. Parifculate caught In 

nozzle, probe and glassware 

5. Tota1 Frcnt - Half Catch 

4~ 6 

3 

i • z 

Back - Half Analysis (Impingers, and Connecttng Gfiassware) 

I. Partkulate caught In impingers 

eraporated down at less than 

120' F. i • Y' 

Totai Partkulate Catch (Sum of Front and Back - Half Catcfies) 

a•~ w, 

/-71 
American Environmental Testing Cornpany, Inc_ 

SSS South Birch Drive 

Spanish ForK Utah 84650 

(801) 256-7111 

,y 

. . _ ._ - 

Source: Run Number: 

ORSAT ANALYSIS 

(Average of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Volume Percent - Dry 

Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon 

Dixoide 

Carbon 

Monoxide 

2 ~2 <0 -~ 

Average 

79'-3 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

POST TEST AC>=TONE EVAPORATION 

COMPANY: 75~ •%-s76?-,k— ~r'~ C~ ~ 

SOURCE: TSC;r#? 

CONTAINER #2 DATE: tn, / 

PARTICLES GREATER 

THAN PM-10 

ACETONE BLANK 

Voiume of Liquic 

Final Weight CONTAINER #3 

Tare Weight j/0 G-Tr° (l PARTICLES PM-10 

Residue G•`~ Z OR SMALLER 

RUN #1 

Volume of Liquic 

Color 

Final Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank 

- Blank 

Residue 

RUN #2 

Voiume of Liquic 

' Color 

Final Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank 

- Blank 

Residue 

RUN #3 

Volume of Liquic 

Color 

Final Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank 

- Blank 

Residue 

RUN #1 

Voiume of LIquic 

Calor 

Final Weight /0 ?. 9/ 3 S ~ 

Tare Weight / o 7// L 

Residue & Blank O- p 0 2-3 

- Blank d - O D o Z 

Residue b O° L- / 

RUN #2 

Volume of Liquic -:2. 

Color c 

Final Weight 7

~p- 2- / .2- 

Tare Weight `l rr • 2 1O "t 

Residue & BIanM o. o o 2, / 

- Blank 0 - 0 o 0 Z 

Residue 0- o v! ^ 7 

RUN #3 

Voiume ot Liquic Z° ~ " l s 

Color c!r ~ 

Finai Weight /o G• 7 Y S/ 

Tare Weight 7 ~f 3k 

Residue & Blank o• o (D 1 3 

- Blank b • v °o Z 

Residueo 0< 

/~~ 
AMERICAN ENViRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-71 1 1 

Spanisn Fork, Utah 84660 

POST TEST BACK HALF EVAPORATION 

COMPANY: 1~ ?4--3f`*- Zr- C' ~G 

SOURCE: t7C #t3 

DATE: ~_~ 

CONTAINER sl 

METHYLENE CHLORIDE 

BLANK 

Volume of Liquid 3 c 0 ^^ ( s 

Flnal Weight (a 5'3 3 

Tare Weight / 0 1 • frS3 Z 

Residue t 

CONTAINER =2 

DISTILLED WATER 

BLANK 

Volume of Liquid3 O° •~- ~ s 

Final Weight y2. ? 7 G G 

Tare Weight 77 G ~ 

Residue ro • o o Z 

RUN s 1 RUN s 1 

Volume of Liquid 2- o O A-.. l S Volume of Liquid 

Color c-(Gc,— Color C./c . 

Final Weight / 9 2 Final Weight 1O2. ?3 / ~ 

Tare Weight 9f1. 11 Z L Tare Weight /a L• ft3 O f 

Resldue & Blank v•°° D G Residue & Blank b- o y 1 v 

- Blank 0. o a o Blank O.pOOZ 

Residue ~• ~ S D- ~ '^' > Residue 8 p-Ir ..._ ~ 

RUN s2 

Volume of Liquid 2DO ~•..ls 

RUN =2 

Volume of Liquid 

Color G (c e-- 

Finai Wetght ? yAL Final 

Tare Weight Y S• (?57- 8• Tare 

Residue & Blank °- 0 o O Residue 

- Blank cD • o 0 0 , 

Restdue D • 0 0 10 

Color C&G — 

Weight F'r23 7 

Weight 

a<Blank o.oDO I 

- Blank O •000 Z 

Restdue a - O o0 7 ,7 

RUN s3 

Volume of Liquid z oo ••., ls 

Color ctc C.- 

Final Welght 9 f. 7¢S~~fTare Weight 99• 7 4± ~f 

Residue & Blank o. o o/ O 

- Blank [,> • o 0 o i - Blank (9• 00 02 

Residue y_ a o D -7 0 Residue m - o 0 0 8 p. £r j 

RUN =3 

Volume of Liquid >o o— Ls 

Color Gt 4- a-- 

Final Weight 101. 96 1 7 Z 

Tare Weight lOZ. p! 6, d7 

Resldue & Blank n• 0 o o8, 

i?4 
PRETEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC#4 Baghouse 

RUN #: #1 Compliance 

Pbar Pg Ts Tm 

in Hg in H20 °F °F 

25.31 -0.03 50 90 

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient 

% % % °F 

0.1 20.8 79.1 40 

total run time # of points ePavg ePi 

min in H20 in H20 

60 12 0.22 0.09 

DATE: 12/5194 

B(ws) dH@ iUeter 

fraction in H20 

0.02 1.748 

Cp(2) Cp(201 A) 

dimensionless dimensioniess 

0.8394 0.8394 

Y stadc area 

meter coef ft2 

0.998 1.9174 

Md Mw Ps μs 

Ib/Ib mole Ib✓Ib mole in Hg micropoise 

28.848 28.631 25.308 174.831 

as OH AH(-50) AH(+50) 

ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 

0.4472 0.561 0.690 0.466 

Pretest Pitots 

Finish 589.036 + ok 

Start 589.034 - ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 18.6 

Posttest Pitots 

Finish 617.429 + ok 

Start 617.426 - ok 

0.003 

Vacuum 19 

l ~~5" 
TEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201 A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC#4 Baghouse Date: 12/5/94 

RUN #: #1 Compliance 

START: 920 

STOP: 1016 

point # AP(201 A) dweil act time Ts Tmo 

in H20 min decimal °F °F 

1 0.09 3.20 315 50 64 

2 0.2 4.77 445 46 64 

3 0.22 5.00 500 44 65 

4 0.21 4.89 500 42 67 

5 0.23 5.11 500 42 69 

6 0.25 5.33 515 42 71 

7 0.27 5.54 530 42 74 

8 0.26 5.44 530 42 76 

9 0.24 5.22 515 43 79 

10 0.25 5.33 515 43 81 

11 0.22 5.00 500 43 83 

12 0.21 4.89 500 43 84 

total 59.7 

avg 0.22 5865.00 43.50 73.08 

Actual Time: 59.75 

Average Meter Temp: 79.54 

) 71o5) 
Tmi Tov Vm vacuum oH SqRt ,&P 

°F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 

589.108 

64 265 590.665 1.2 0.56 0.0000 

66 265 592.906 1.1 0.56 0.0000 

73 266 595.271 1.2 0.56 0.0000 

79 265 597.655 1.2 0.56 0.0000 

84 266 600.013 1.2 0.56 0.0000 

88 266 602.518 1.2 0.56 0.5000 

91 265 605.152 1.2 0.56 0.5196 

93 264 607.792 1.2 0.56 0.5099 

96 264 610.304 1.2 0.56 0.4899 

98 265 612.565 1.2 0.56 0.5000 

99 267 614.946 12 0.56 0.4690 

101 265 617.355 1.2 0.56 0.4583 

28.25 

86.00 265.25 1.19 0.5600 0.2872 

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS 

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg 

mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 

30.5 1.44 0.06 25.31 -0.03 

Ps μs Vmds as Mw D50 

in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min Am 

25.31 170.34 23.33 0.47 28.2191 9.5171 

Average Dn An Vs iso as 

in ft2 ft/sec % 

0.216 2.5447E-4 17.31 177.17 9.9819E+4 

Total Mg Cs Cs Emr 

mg . Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 

9.0 8.5055E-7 0.0060 0.08 

II? 
American Environmental Testing Company, lnc. 

` 565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Forlc, Utah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

LAB O RATO RY D ~1TA 

EPA Method 201A 

. . .. _ . 

Company: Run Number: 

Sampling Location:Lank°Ase p C- 04 Date• 1 Z-S- 9y 

impinger 1 

Impinger 2 

Impinger 3 

impinger 4 

Inftial Weight 

s36• y 

y Z (~'. Z 

C 8~1.6 

.. ~• = • = --='~ 

Finai Welght 

SBs. (0 

510• 6 

L13Z-3 

6 85.1 

Weight Galn 

_+ , o. 

-J- 13 . Z 

4-0 5- 

Totai G4 =-+'30 , S 

Particulate Colfected 

Pfrl - 10 Partit uiats Larger lhan PU -14 ParticuEal 

1. Fitter Finai Weight: _ o ,Z~3 9 Acetone Wash Mg 

2. Fifter Tane Weight: _ 

3. Net Fitter Weight: _ 0.0051 

4. Acetone Wash Mg:: 

S. Total PM-10 Mg: _ ~ 7, z. ~ 

Badk Hat! Ma" ~ 

- Paarticulate Caught In" Impingers Mg. 

. S~ ..~.., 

. ' ~ ~ -- ~. _ 

1 

. .. 

- - 

5- a "5 

/ 79' 
PRETEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC#4 Baghouse 

RUN #: #2 Compliance 

Pbar Pg Ts Tm 

in Hg in H20 °F °F 

25.31 -0.03 50 90 

CO2 

% 

0.1 

total run time 

min 

60 

02 

% 

20.8 

# of points 

12 

N2 +CO 

% 

79.1 

APavg 

in H20 

0.22 

Tambient 

°F 

40 

aP1 

in H20 

0.09 

DATE: 1215/94 

B(ws) al-i@ Meter 

fraction in H20 

0.02 1.748 

Cp(2) Cp(201 A) 

dimensionless dimensionless 

0.8394 0.8394 

Y stadc area 

meter coef ft2 

0.998 1.9174 

Md Mw Ps Na 

Ib/lb mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 

28.848 28.631 25.308 174.831 

Os AH AH(-50) OH(+50) 

ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 

0.4472 0.561 0.690 0.466 

Pretest Pitots 

Finish 617.664 + ok 

S tart 617.662 - ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 18 

Posttest Pitots 

Finish 644.632 + ok 

Start 644.63 - ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 19 

iiq 
nozzle Dn APmn OPmx 

# 

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0233 

2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0330 

3 0.3937 0.0054 0.0483 

4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0736 

5 0.3150 0.0131 0.1178 

6 0.2756 0.0223 0.1825 

7 0.2362 0.0414 0.3024 

8 0.2165 0.0798 0.4080 

9 0.1969 0.1440 0.5715 

10 0.1772 0.2520 0.8396 

11 0.15 0.5555 1.5692 

12 0.135 0.8869 2.3495 

13 'Error' 'Error• 

14 'Error• 'Error` 

15 'Error• 'Error` 

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx 

in ft/sec fflsec fvsec fvsec 

1 0.47 6.12 'Error' 3.06 12.56 

2 0.43 7.29 'Error' 3.64 13.85 

3 0.39 8.82 'Error' 4.41 15.53 

4 0.35 10.89 'Error' S.44 17.81 

5 0.32 13.77 'Error' 6.89 21.00 

6 0.28 17.99 •Error' 9.00 25.72 

7 0.24 24.50 11.83 12.25 33.10 

8 0.22 29.16 17.01 14.58 38.45 

9 0.20 35.25 22.84 17.63 46.51 

10 0.18 43.52 30.22 21.76 55.16 

11 0.15 60.74 44.86 30.37 75.41 

12 0.14 74.99 56.69 37.49 92.27 

13 0.00 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 

14 0.00 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 'Error• 

15 0.00 'En•or` 'Error' `Error' 'Error' 

r~ 
Vmxc OPmn OPmnc aPmx OPmxc An 

ft/sec in H20 in H20 in H20 in H20 ft2 

choose largest choose smallest 

9.19 'Error' 0.0026 0.04 0.0233 1.2172E-3 

10.93 'Error' 0.0037 0.05 0.03 1.0231 E-3 

13.23 'En•or' 0.0054 0.07 0.05 8.4539E-4 

16.33 'Error' 0.0082 0.09 0.07 6.8465E-4 

20.66 'Error' 0.0131 0.12 0.12 5.4119E-4 

26.99 'Error' 0.0223 0.18 0.20 4.1427E-4 

36.74 0.04 0.0414 0.30 0.37 3.0429E-4 

43.73 0.08 0.0587 0.41 0.53 2.5565E-4 

52.88 0.14 0.0857 0.57 0.77 2.1146E-4 

65.29 0.25 0.1307 0.84 1.18 1.7126E-4 

91.11 0.56 0.25 1.57 2.29 1.2272E-4 

112.48 0.89 0.39 2.35 3.49 9.9402E-5 

'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 'Error' 'En•or' 

'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 

'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 

` ~ I 
TEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201A 

TEST S1TE: Interstate Brick DC#4 Baghouse Date: 12/5/94 

RUN #: #2 Compliance 

START: 1115 

STOP: 1219 

point # AP(201 A) dwell act time Ts Tmo 

in H20 min dec9mal °F °F 

1 0.09 3.20 315 43 79 

2 0.21 4.89 500 42 78 

3 0.19 4.65 445 42 78 

4 0.24 5.22 515 45 78 

5 0.22 5.00 500 44 80 

6 0.2 4.77 445 43 81 

7 0.21 4.89 500 42 84 

8 0.19 4.65 445 42 84 

9 022 5.00 500 42 85 

10 0.2 4.77 445 42 85 

11 0.19 4.65 445 42 88 

12 0.21 4.89 500 41 89 

total 56.5 

avg 0.20 5555.00 42.50 82.42 

Actual Time: 57.25 

Average Meter Temp: 87.67 

(0- 
Tmi Tov Vm vacuum oH SqRt oP 

°F °F fq in Hg in H20 

617.728 

79 265 619.342 1.1 0.56 0.0000 

80 268 621.716 1.1 0.56 0.0000 

85 268 623.978 1.2 0.56 0.0000 

90 268 626.462 1.2 0.56 0.0000 

93 244 628.843 1.2 0.56 0.0000 

96 242 630.791 1.2 0.56 0.4472 

92 246 633.172 1.2 0.56 0.4583 

95 247 635.461 1.2 0.56 0.4359 

98 247 637.863 1.2 0.56 0.4690 

101 247 639.868 1.2 0.56 0.4472 

102 246 642.121 1.2 0.56 0.4359 

104 247 644.54 1.2 0.56 0.4583 

26.81 

92.92 252.92 1.18 0.5600 0.2626 

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS 

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg 

mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 

15.8 0.74 0.03 25.31 -0.03 

Ps μs Vmds Os Mw D50 

in Hg mp ft3 ft3/min μm 

25.31 171.93 21.81 0.44 28.4904 9.9198 

Average Dn An Vs iso Gs . 

in f1:2 fvsec % 

0.216 2.5447E-4 15.73 184.91 9.3346E+4 

Total Mg Cs Cs Emr 

mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 

4.1 4.1436E-7 0.0029 0.04 

1~ 3 
American Environmental Testing Company, lnc. 

' • 565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84550 

(801) 266-7111 

LAB O RATO RY D/1T/l 

EPA Method 201A 

Company: k r, cfc ,, r.w . T. (ATrOy Run Number: -;# 2 ~",~,, 

Sampling Location:f- 4,g 4 .v°v"e D c - o y Date:J2- s— - 5 c 

UM- r 7i 9 1 _ •- : • 

. initial Weight Finai Weight Weight Gain 

impinger 1 S26. S 

Impi nger '2 Sy a• o S 3 8 ~ s" 

impinger 3 Li 3 O 

Impinger4 7rz.! -~- S• Z 

Tota1 Gain LD 

Particutate Co(fected 

L• cI L-st-l- - 

1. Fitter Final Weight: • 0 . 14 q 7 

2. Fitter Tare Weight: o• 19 83 =z" 

3. Net Fitter Weight: O1 8 D I'1 ~ I''k —) 

4. Acetone Wash Mg: 419WsEt2 

S. Totai PM-10 Mg: ~~•s"-y 

Larger Than P!i -10 ParUcuiale 

Acetorw Wash Mg 

r~..~ 

Bacic Hatt Anaws . _ 

- Particuiate Caught In Impirxgers Mg. 

4'.I ^1 

/~`i" 
PRETEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201 A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Brick DC#4 Baghouse DATE: 12/5/94 

RUN #: #3 Compliance 

Pbar Pg Ts Tm B(ws) AH@ Meter 

in Hg in H20 °F °F fraction in H20 

25.31 -0.03 50 90 0.02 1.748 

CO2 02 N2 +CO Tambient Cp(2) Cp(201 A) 

% % % °F dimensionless dimensionless 

0.1 20.8 79.1 40 0.8394 0.8394 

total run time # of points APavg aP1 Y stadc area 

min in H20 in H20 meter coef ft2 

60 12 - 0.22 0.09 0.998 1.9174 

Md Mw ps 93 

Ib/Ib mole Ib/Ib mole in Hg micropoise 

28.848 28.631 25.308 174.831 

as eH OH(-50) OH(+50) 

ft3/min in H20 in H20 in H20 

0.4472 0.561 0.690 0.466 

Pretest Pitots 

Finish 645.316 + ok 

Start 645.314 - ok 

0.002 

Vacuum 18 

Posttest Pitots 

Finish 672.866 + ok 

Start 672.863 - ok 

0.003 

Vacuum 20 

id 
nozzle Dn OPmn APmx 

# 

1 0.4724 0.0026 0.0233 

2 0.4331 0.0037 0.0330 

3 0.3937 0.0054 0.0483 

4 0.3543 0.0082 0.0736 

5 0.3150 0.0131 0.1178 

6 0.2756 0.0223 0.1825 

7 0.2362 0.0414 0.3024 

8 0.2165 0.0798 0.4080 

9 0.1969 0.1440 0.5715 

10 0.1772 0.2520 0.8396 

11 0.15 0.5555 1.5692 

12 0.135 0.8869 2.3495 

13 •Error' 'En•or' 

14 `En•or' •Error' 

15 'Error• 'En•or' 

Dn Vn Vmn Vmnc Vmx 

in ft/sec ft/sec ft/sec fvsec 

1 0.47 6.12 'Error' 3.06 12.56 

2 0.43 7.29 'Error' 3.64 13.85 

3 0.39 8.82 'En•or' 4.41 15.53 

4 0.35 10.89 'Error' 5.44 17.81 

5 0.32 13.77 'En•or' 6.89 21.00 

6 0.28 17.99 'En•or' 9.00 25.72 

7 0.24 24.50 11.83 12.25 33.10 

8 0.22 29.16 17.01 14.58 38.45 

9 0.20 35.25 22.84 17.63 45.51 

10 0.18 43.52 30.22 21.76 55.16 

11 0.15 60.74 44.86 30.37 75.41 

12 0.14 74.99 56.69 37.49 92.27 

13 0.00 'En•ar' 'Error' 'Error' 'Error• 

14 0.00 'Error• 'Error' 'Error• 'Error' 

15 0.00 'Error• 'En•or' 'Error' 'Error' 

~ 
Vmxc APmn APmnc 

ft/sec in H20 in H20 

choose largest 

9.19 'Error' 0.0026 

10.93 'Error' 0.0037 

13.23 'Error' 0.0054 

16.33 'Error' 0.0082 

20.66 'Error' 0.0131 

26.99 'Error' 0.0223 

36.74 0.04 0.0414 

43.73 0.08 0.0587 

52.88 0.14 0.0857 

65.29 0.25 0.1307 

91.11 0.56 0.25 

112.48 0.89 0.39 

'Error' 'Error' 'En•or' 

'Error' 'Error' 'Error' 

'En•oP' 'Error' `Error' 

APmx oPmxc 

in H20 in H20 

choose smallest 

0.04 0.0233 

0.05 0.03 

0.07 0.05 

0.09 0.07 

0.12 0.12 

0.18 0.20 

0.30 0.37 

0.41 0.53 

0.57 0.77 

0.84 1.18 

1.57 2.29 

2.35 3.49 

'Error' 'Error' 

'Error' 'Error' 

•Error' 'Error' 

An 

ft2 

1.2172E-3 

1.0231 E-3 

8.4539E-4 

6.8465E-4 

5.4119E-4 

4.1427E-4 

3.0429E-4 

2.5565E-4 

2.1146E-4 

1.7126E-4 

1.2272E-4 

9.9402E-5 
TEST DATA 

PM10 METHOD 201A 

TEST SITE: Interstate Bricic DC#4 Baghouse Date: 12/5/94 

RUN #: #3 Compliance 

START: 1255 

STOP: 1219 

point # 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

AP(201 A) 

in H20 

0.09 

0.19 

0.21 

0.23 

0.22 

0.23 

0.19 

0.2 

0.22 

0.23 

0.21 

0.2 

dwell 

min 

3.20 

4.65 

4.89 

5.11 

5.00 

5.11 

4.65 

4.77 

5.00 

5.11 

4.89 

4.77 

act time 

decimal 

315 

445 

500 

500 

500 

500 

445 

445 

500 

500 

500 

445 

Ts 

°F 

43 

42 

41 

41 

42 

41 

42 

43 

42 

42 

42 

42 

Tmo 

'F 

85 

85 

85 

86 

87 

88 

89 

90 

90 

91 

92 

93 

total 57.1 

avg 0.20 5595.00 41.92 88.42 

Actual Time: 57.25 

Average Meter Temp: 92.88 

,s 

i ~ 
Tmi Tov Vm vacuum oH SqRt oP 

°F °F ft3 in Hg in H20 

645.377 

85 245 647.096 1.1 0.56 0.0000 

89 249 649.384 1.1 0.56 0.0000 

93 248 651.763 1.1 0.56 0.0000 

96 247 654.158 1.2 0.56 0.0000 

99 248 656.548 1.2 0.56 0.0000 

100 248 658.968 1.2 0.56 0.4796 

93 247 660.926 1.2 0.56 0.4359 

99 249 663.227 1.2 0.56 0.4472 

101 248 665.631 1.2 0.56 0.4690 

103 248 668.044 1.2 0.56 0.4796 

105 249 670.444 1.2 0.56 0.4583 

105 249 672.738 1.2 0.56 0.4472 

27.36 

97.33 247.92 1.17 0.5600 0.2681 

POSTTEST CALCULATIONS 

Vw Vwstd bws Pbar Pg 

mis ft3 fraction in Hg in H20 

23.4 1.10 0.05 25.31 -0.03 

Ps μs Vmds as Mw D50 

in Hg mp ft3 f0min μm 

25.31 170.70 22.05 0.45 28.3319 9.7058 

Average Dn An Vs Iso as 

in ft2 fvsec % 

0.216 2.5447E-4 16.09 185.32 9.4149E+4 

Total Mg Cs Cs Emr 

mg Ib/dscf gr/dscf Ibs/hr 

5.9 5.8987E-7 0.0041 0.06 
American Environ mental Testin g C ompany, I nc. 

` 565 South Birch Drive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 268-7111 

L/i1130RATO RY DATA 

EPA Method 201A 

 Compan . .. y' -~.~ •~.,s-Faf ~ 8r: c k , ~.~. ~ Lt ~~- ~ Run Number. ~ 3 ro... P~'~~~ • 

Sampling Locration: &9k'"f c 04 - °y Date• 

Moisture Collected 

• In1tEal Weight Finai Welght Weight Gain 

Impinger 1 S~ ~ • 3 ~' ? y, 6 ,,. -Z-, ~ 

impingerZ Sc2. 7 tzz.3 

Impinger 3 y2 6,7 

.impinger 4 7 ~ 2 , 1 ~ ~s• ~ ~- 3. ~ 

' Total Gain Z 3 •q~ 

Particutate Collected 

Plri - 10 Pari3cU"ie t,.asrger Than PM -10 Particuftle 

1. Fitter Final Weight: • O• 2..0 1 S Acetone Wash Mg 

2. Filter Tare Weight:0•1 98 3Z-3 ~ 

3. Net Fitter Weight: o- dv 3 ~ 3• 2- 

4. Acetone Wash Mg: 

S. Total PM-10 Mg: - ~ -- 

ftdc Halt Anz"s . • • ~ ~._ - 

- Particulate Caught in lmpingers Mg. 

m 
American Environmental Testing Cornpany, Inc. 

565 So uth Birch D rive 

Spanish Forte, Utah 84664 

(801) 286-7111 

. . Itr- s- 

. Run Number: ~~- Z ~~ • 

ORSAT ANALYSiS 

(Aaerage of 3 analyses each) 

Test Number Yoiume Percent - Dry 

Nttrogen Oxygen Carbon 

Dixoide 

Carbon 

Monoxide 

~0.~ 

-z r7q~ c a-o. B' 0.1 < o. ~ 

-3 

Avemge ~ ~. ~ eLo. 

a 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INCORPORATED 

565 So. Birch Drive 801-266-7111 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

POST TEST ACBTONE EVAPORATION 

COMPANY:~'f'~ 's t""S 63"2r-& 

SOURCE:DC.#ft 

CONTAINER #2 DATE: 

PARTICLES GREATER 

THAN PM-10 

_ ACETONE BLANK 

Volume of Liquic 3S~`~ "" t

' 

Finai Weight CONTAINER #3 

Tare Weight AoarJ PARTICLES PM-10 

Residue o-~`~ d ~ OR SMALLER 

RUN #1 

Volume of Liquic ' ~ ` 

Color r 

Final Weight 

Tare W.eight 

Residue & Blank 

- Blank 

Residue ~ 

~ 

RUN #2 

Volume of Llquic 

Color ' 

Final Weight ~ 

Tare Weight ~ 

Residue & Blank ~ 

- Blank ~ 

Residue ~ 

RUN #3 / 

Volume of Liquic 

COIor 

Final Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue & Blank 

- Btank~ 

Residue~ 

RUN #1 

Volume of LIquic 

Color 

Finai Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue & BIanM 

- Blank 

Residue 

RUN #2 

Volume of Liquic 

Color 

Final Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue & BIanM 

- Blank 

Residue 

RUN #3 

Volume of Liquic 

Color 

Final Weight 

Tare Weight 

Residue & BIanM 

- Blank 

Residue 

20 O — ! s 

c << , 

45. $oZ? 

T t. k o o -14 

o.v0Z3 

d. oou ~ 

i. 

) .0 013 

p•OoyZ2 C a ~ 5 

e- lG -- 

9~ 74 o y 

~ y.?s-?i 

l ~~ 
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL 

565 So. Bircn Drive 

Spanisn Foric, 

TEST 1 NG, I NCOR PORATED 

801-266-7111 

Utan 84660 

POST TEST BACK HALF E VAPORAT i ON 

CCMPANY: --ZZ; ~'~°`'`t A-, `le_ 

SOURCE: PG 1024 

DATE: 

CONTAINER s 1 CONTAINER =2 

METHYLENE CHLORIDE DISTILLED WATER 

3 0 ~ "' ` S 

BLANK BLANK 

Volume ot Liquid /0 2. Volume ot Liquid 2°y 

Final Weight 10i- SYs-3 z Flnal Weight 7.6 

Tare Weight Tare Weight ? ,a 5` 

Residue 4- o o Residue o• o 0o L 

RUN s 1 RUN s 1 

Volume ot Liquid zo Volume or Liquid 2-13° 

Colof L/ Color Gc-_._- 

Final Weight 9Y./7 Final Weight /o Z. s~~ O 7 

Tare Weight Qr. /7 Sr Z Tare Weight 40 

Residue & Blank G. y y L- Resldue & Blank o .0 00 7 

- Blank ° •'0 v Blank 0-0 o o z 

Residue Residue o.00 o 

RUN s2 RUN s2 

Volume or Liquid Volume or Liquid 20 0 ~-- << 

Color Color c-t—-- 

Flnal Weight T f r Z Final Weight 104 .Yd 1'0 

Tare Weight 11 5- 7 2 Z Tare Weight /0 G• yD 0/ 

Residue a< Blank b_ (90 Residue & Blank c) '° o° 1 

-Blank v-OVV -Blank O.oao ,_ 

Residue 0-0 o v q 0, 11 Restdue O. o c9 0"7 m• ? 

RUN s3 RUN s3 

Volume oif Ltquld ~~ ~-`~ Volume or Liquid 2-10o 

Color Color r_Ce, 

Finai Weight fa6. ~s 2 3 1 Finai Weight 45- . lY.41-O 

Tare Weight !0 ` - yzZ `F Tare Weight p y/`t .? 3 

Resldue & Blank d - 00 0 '7 Residue & Blank 0 - 0 O° *7 

-Blank 0. 000 Blank o- 000 '- 

Residue 10 - a 00 e- 0 14, Residue O • D o o 5" O , ~ 

i q3 
Appendix "E" 

(Emissions Calculations) 

ogmtziaan Envi.%onm.antaC gz4tin9 eo tz#any ffnc. 

cRcno, dVevac& Jn-fwenZx, c4t;aona c'u .r4.4z nty, Vtafs 

7o2-786-83S3 6o2-2S3-3354 801-266-7111 

!9`1 
(=74mEzLcan EncrftonmEnfaf 

~:7Elfbzcy Com#any, ~nc. 

565 csout{'s L3tu~s 2' ~ z1ve 

cs/2a ais.4 goa, Q~ta.4 8¢66o 

801-798-8553 

Nomenclature for Particulate Cal'ulations 

S mX boi 

Ag 

Enqlish Units_ 

in2 

Metric Units 

m2 

Descriction 

Stack Area 

Can gr/dscf' g/dscm' Particulate - probe, cyclone and fiiter 

Cao gr/dscf• g/dscm• Particuiate - total 

Cat grlCF g/m3 Particulate - probe, cylone ar.d filter 

@ stacfc conditions 

Cau gr/CF g/m3 Particulate - total 

@ stack conditions 

Caw Ibs/hr kg/hr Particulate - probe, cycione and fiiter 

Cax Ibs/hr kg/hr Particulate - total 

CP 

Pitot Tube Calibration Factor 

Dn in m Sampling Nozzie Diameter 

y,Eq Percent Excess Air at sampling point 

g 32.2 fVs2 9.81 m/s2 Acceleration of gravity 

% I Percent isokinetic 

y,M Percent moisture in stack gas by Voiume 

Md _ Mole faction of dry ga.s 

' 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (790 mm Hg, 20° C) 

cRc,so, r.,/Vevac& Jn- 4oenlx, 44ii.zona cS'aPt 1'a.&e cEty, 2Ctali 

702-786-8553 6oz- 253- 3354 8or-z66-71n 

)a6 
Sm-mb-aL English Units Metric Units Descr9otion 

M f mg mg Particulate - probe, cyclone and filter 

MH2O 18 Ibllb-moie Molecular Weight of Water 

m t mg mg Particulate - total 

MW Ib/Ib-mole g/g-mole Molecuiar Weight of wet stack gas 

MWair 28.95 Ib/Ib-mole Molecular Weight of air 

MWd Ib/Ib-mole g/g-mo(e Molecular Weight of dry stack gas 

Pb "Hg Absolute mm Hg Barometric Pressure 

Pm 'H20 mm H20 Orifice Pressure Drop 

Ps "Hg Absolute mm Hg Stack Pressure 

AP "H20 mm H2o Velocity Head of stack gas 

Pstd 029•92 "H9 760 mm Hg Standard Barometric Pressure 

O,a ACFM m 3/ h r Stack Gas Volume at Actual Stack condition 

Os DSCFM' dscm/hr' Stack Gas Volume at 29.92 "Hg, 5280R,dry 

R 21.83 'Hg- Universal Gas Consant 

ft3/Ib-mole°R 

Tm OF °C Average Gas Meter Temperature 

Tt min min Net Time of test 

Ts OF °C Stack Temperature 

Tstd • 

528°R 293 K Standard Temperature 

Vm ft3 m3 Volume of dry gas sampled at meter 

condtions 

Vmstd dscf' dscm' Volume of dry gas sampled at standani 

conditions 

Vs fpm m/sec Stack velocity at stack conditions 

Vw ml ml Total water collected in impingers and 

' 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (790 mm Hg. 20° C) silica gel 

I 9A 
I BIL-1- 1-i 

Vwgas scf' scm' Volume of water vapor collected at 

standard conditions 

pair 0.0748 Ibs/ft3 Dens9ty ofAir 

pH20 1 g/ml Density of water 

pman 51.63 Ibs/ft3 Denisty of manometer oil 

Standard Conditions: 29.92 'Hg, 68°F (760 mm Hg. 20° C) 

' 29.92 'Hg, 528°R (760 mm Hg. 20° C) 

19l 
Sample Calculations 

0L 

NOx =(ppmdv) x(1.194 x 10-7) = pounds/dscf 

( Ibs/dscf) x(Os Fiow Rate in dscf/hr) = pounds/hour 

Kel 

CO =(ppmdv) x(1-°/aCO2) x(0.728 x 10-7) = poundsldscf 

(pounds/dscf) x(Qs Flow Rate in dscf/hr) = pounds/h.our 

K*q 

S02 =(ppmdv) x(1.66 x 10-7) = pounds/dscf 

(pounds/dscf) x(OS Flow Rate in dscflhr) = pounds/hour 

1?00' 
Appendix '•F,• 

(Cyclonic Flow Determinations) 

o4nuzi.aan Envi.zonmrnEuf 9jutL z9 eom#any ffnc. 

ez~o, dVtvada J~{'soenlx, o'~si.tona cSaCt 1'aka ei.ty, Q CtaX 

7oz-786-8553 6oz-z53-3354 8oy-z66-7», 

1 0(i 
JE_tirn9 C'o rz#any, -Ync 

~ 1 16s cSout/'i `l.~' tsj leivt 

VO'4 qtiaA d'4660 

8Or.266-771 1 

~ METHOD 2 

CYCLONIC FLOW DETERMINATION DATA FOR14 

Plant (C 

Location irn 

Date ! 2. 

Bar. Press. ("Hg)25`. 4( S 

Pitot Tube (Cp) b. li' tf 2-`1 

Run No . T rc.4-s t' 

Operator'"1-8$ - ReB 

Amb . Temp . °F Zf dD 

Static Press.("H20) 

Stack Dimensions •i 

Traverse 

point 

number 

Velocity 

head 

(.ap ), 

in. e20 

Stack temp., 

°r 

Cvclonic flow determination 

A p at 0° 

refere nce 

Angle ( cr ) 

wnich yields 

a niill p 

Z .o L 

2 fc p, p Z — 

3. O 3 

17 , 

3 0 2. 

_v 

~ • ~ O 02 

Z 

?. O C L _ 

O . 

Averaae anRle (oC ) a 

rp•~~ 

aAverage of ac mu5t L- e < 10 degrees to be acceptatile 

490 
~~stiny L'om ~any, ~n~ 

~ 1 J67 csauk/i bise ~ ~i ~Lsiva 

-spdua 00s~ qG644 J4660 

~ Sor-266-77n 

~ ML•THOD 2 

CYCLONIC FLOW DETE.RMINATION DATA FORM 

Plan t =T..~-~5 •

Location ck ~ 

Date 

Bar. Press. ("Hg) 

Pitot Tube (Cp)r)_ Te) ~, 

Run No . 

Operator 

Amb. Tesnp. °F 

Static Press. ("H20) 4 • O / 

Z 

Stack Dimensions 1•00 • 4 Z 

Tra•terse 

point 

number 

Velocity 

head 

(.& p), 

in. 1~20 

S tack temp ., 

°F 

Cvclonic flow determination 

• p at 00 

refrence 

Ang2e ( CC ) 

which yields 

a aiill p 

L .o O O 

~ O . o 0 

d 

o Z D 

~ 10 , o c- . O ~ 

.oy v.v 

_o Z m 

,o2~ o 0 

l 

0 oZ •D 

!0 0 . 3 0 

L O 

r z 

o•03 • ~ 

1 • Z (o . L9 

o• Z ° 

.DZ 

Average angle ( oC ) a 

0 

~ • ~O ~ 

a Average of eC musL be < 10 degreas to be accepcab.le 

n.b ~ 
9E_tin9 Corn#a.ny, gnc. 

~ - 16? SouF~ `~ise/i ~ ~Lsiva 

; 8u~ -266•Ti~ 

~ ML•THOD 2 

CYCLONIC FLOW DETEBMSNATION DATA FORM 

Plan t 4-~41- e< ULocation pr; 2e--fAWt14- 

Date 2- r/,6 /4 Y 

Bar. . Pr ess .("Hg ) 2 S' • 2- S7-- 

Pitot Tube (Cp) d _ Sr3 % '/ 

Run No . f?-,e +c..5 "~- 

Operator 6,$r-j— - RP 

Amb. Temp. °F ~' ( 

Static Press.("H 20} —1•S 

Stack Dimensions O -1 Ys— 

Traverse 

point 

number 

Velocity 

head 

p), 

in. 20 

Stack temp. , 

°F 

Cvclonic flow determination 

L p at 0° 

reference 

AngZe ( d ) 

which yields 

a niill Ap 

V . O ~ 

3 

Z .J 

Z . O-OZ- (o 

z 0.03 

• r~ o 

~- o 

. 3 b . 03 

z- a. . 3 

22- ;- .03 

2 _3 -03 Lo 

Averace angle (aC )

a 

a Average of cc must be < 10 degreas to be acceptable 

4

~~ 
--)E1C1lZ5 (..OI7Z)t2a12y, J1ZC. 

~ ~ 36J Sout~i `L~`ise~i f11 si~e 

Jr{bbo 

Su~ -zob-7rn 

I 

MLTHOD 2 

CYCLONIC FLOW DETERMINATION DATA FORM 

Plan t 

r 

Location dL#' B~~~ ous-t 

Date /lZJ" ~1 `2 - 

--T ~ 

Bar. Press. ("Hg) 2 S• 3I 

Pitot Tube (Cp) o'• 9,4/1 y 

Run No. {~i~e r4~ r 

Operator 

Amb. Temp. °F 

S tatic Press . ( "H 20) -'— yz 

Stack Dimensions •-/. c/ /7 ¢ -Or

C-Z 

Ii 

Traverse 

point 

number 

Velocity 

head 

(s p), 

in. 1~ 20 

Stacko Ttemp., 

r 

Cvclonic flow determination 

A ps at 0° 

reference 

Angle ( W ) 

which yields 

a null -& p 

0 3 

p 

4 1 a L S 

o , 12 O • ~ 

O O 

•p g O. D 

/ .O 

O 4- 

/ 3 - O "7 

o. 0.0 1 3 

i .o 

Average angle (cC )° 

a Average oF ee must• be < 10 degrees to be acceptable 

aO) 
9E_Ein9 Corrz#any, _qrz:. 

~~ 16J ~ou!/i L• ~ise~ Lsivt 

cS~bw+is~i ~os.~ ZCta~i S4bb0 

Sor. z66.7111 

~ METHOD 2 

CYCLONIC FLOW DETE.RMINATION DATA FOR14 

Plan t Ais ~-r.•~ ~~• e~ l/ 

Location /-7- pr72~' 

Date 

Bar. Press. ("Hg) L S^ . 3 I 

Pitot Tube (Cp) 

Run No . P~c ~ f . 

Operator e, cT 4)F# 

Amb. Temp. °F 4 / 

Static Press. ("H20} 3 

Stack Diaiensions /. 117 q ~Z 

Traverse 

point 

number 

Velocity 

head 

(.1p ), 

in .}~ 20 

Stack temp., 

° F 

Cvclonicflow determination 

•-p at 0° 

ref e rence 

Angle (cr ) 

wnich yields 

a niill p 

Z t 

) Z 03 

03 

~ 67. Z L 

o • 2S 

3 Z 

' L 

o , ~ 0.03 

o .2-7' o .DZ 

i m.Z l'J-o 

Average angle (aC ) a 4 (0~~ 

a Average of cC must be < 10 degrees to be acceptable aD'/ 
Appendix "G" 

(Data-Logger Sheets) 

vgrntzican EnvEwnrntnta.f gc4tin9 eo n#any ffnc. 

rJQcno, dVcvadlr J~4ocnEx, c42tzona 

702-786-8553 6oz-253-3354 8oi-z66-pn 

Ab~ 



























~~~~~~~~~~ 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

~~~~0~~~~ 

O~~~s~~~~ 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~o~~~~~~~~ 

s~ o~

~ 

~~~

~~~~~~~~w~

o~o 

~ ~~~~~~ 

~~~~~~~~ 

. . 

~~~~B0e~0 

~~ ~°, o~~~~~~ 

~~v~~ 0~ 

°~~ 

~~~o~a° s~a■ o

~®~ 

~~a~~o~ ~0ao ~~~ 

~~~~~~~~!_~~®~o~~o~~~~~ 









~ 

12/~//94 S02 Averages for the #3 Kiln Inlet 

( Run #1 Run # 2 Run #3 

1 654.1 460.5 558.7 

2 683 374.7 547.9 

3 651.5 486.14 551.6 

4 534.1 573.8 552.7 

5 420.9 591.4 567.3 

6 536 580.5 570 

7 838.6 586.5 569.6 

8 746.9 583.7 569.5 

9 701.9 580.2 564.5 

10 695.5 565.8 547 

11 689.5 559.8 537.6 

12 689.2 566.7 531.8 

13 544 574.6 533.1 

14 442.7 577.9 533.4 

15 432.6 588.5 546.6 

16 594.1 612.1 554 

17 726.4 615.9 555.6 

18 655 619.3 554.6 

19 625.2 629.4 551.1 

20 609.6 631.9 538.4 

21 596.7 633.8 527.6 

22 574.6 636.4 521 

23 559.8 641.6 516 

24 546.9 650.4 518.8 

25 537.6 648.6 518.5 

26 538.7 655.1 523.9 

27 544.3 659.8 547.1 

28 538.7 656.3 559.1 

29 549.4 647 579.8 

30 554.3 601.7 584.6 

Averages a 600.39 593.00 547.71 

. -.._ .~.. 

/1417 
~ 

• 

. - _ _ 

• _ 

~■■~~~ ~~ ~~~, 

°~ 

~~~~_~~~~~ • • ~~ ®~ 

~ 

®~__~_~_~_ • ® O~_~~_ 

~i~i~ 

~~~~ • i- i~t • ~~_~®~ 

' 1 • - ~ ~~~~~ __ ~~~~~~ 

~ ! 

4 ■ ~ V .. ~ 1 ■ 

~_ 

 ~ ► ~ 

--)/If / 
Appendix "H" 

(CEM Readings) 

_ -. ... ~ . 

ogrnaucan ~nv~~con»z ~ntaC 9"tfn9 eonz#any ffizc. 

tJQcRo, Iz/vavada JPfoenix, c4slsona csart -CaL eP#y, QLtA 

70z-786-8553 6o2-2S3-3354 80,-266-7m 

H 
1217//94 Nox Averages tor the #3 Kiln Inlet 

Run #1 Run # 2 Run #3 

1 34.7 35.3 39.6 

2 31.7 36.1 40.6 

3 32 36.6 41.2 

4 19.2 37.2 41.2 

5 15.1 37.3 41.2 

6 18.8 37.2 41.3 

7 27.6 36.8 41.5 

8 33 36.7 40.8 

9 34.7 36.4 41.1 

10 35.4 36.3 41 

11 35.6 35.7 41 

12 34.4 35.5 41 

13 20.1 35.2 40.9 

14 15.6 34.6 41.3 

15 14 33.6 41.3 

16 20.4 33.4 41.3 

17 32.7 33 41.1 

18 36.6 32.6 41 

19 37.9 32.5 40.6 

20 38.1 32.4 40.2 

21 38.3 32.9 39.4 

22 37.8 32.7 38.8 

23 37.6 32.6 38.8 

24 37.8 32.6 36.2 

25 37.7 33.1 35.4 

26 36.9 29 36.4 

27 37.6 29 37 

28 35.6 16.4 37.4 

29 35 12.9 37.9 

30 37.2 17.5 38.7 

Averages 31.303333333 32.44 39.84 

-)il/- 
1216//94 Nox Averages for the #4 Kiln Inlet 

Run #1 Run # 2 Run #3 

1 12.3 12.9 9.8 

2 12.9 12.7 9.7 

3 13.3 12.4 9.6 

4 13.8 12.5 9.8 

5 13.6 12.5 9.5 

6 13.6 12.5 9.2 

7 13.8 12.3 9.3 

8 13.9 12 9.5 

9 13.8 12 9.3 

10 14 11.8 9 

11 14.1 11.8 9.1 

12 13.8 11.7 8.9 

13 13.5 11.2 8.6 

14 13.7 11.1 8.5 

15 13.8 11 8 

16 13.7 10.7 7.7 

17 13.4 10.6 7.3 

18 12.9 10.6 7.1 

19 13 10 7 

20 13 9.8 6.7 

21 13.1 9 7 

22 13 8.7 7.6 

23 12.9 8.5 7.7 

24 13.1 8.4 7.9 

25 12.9 8 8.2 

26 12.9 8 8.5 

27 12.8 7.7 8.9 

28 13 7.9 9.1 

29 13.1 8.4 9.4 

30 12.9 9 9.6 

Averages = 

-- 

13.32 

-:: •:Y: ~ 

. .. .:... .. . 

10.52 8.58 

. 

sO 
12/61/94 S02 Averages for the #4 Kiln Inlet 

Run #1 Run # 2 Run #3 

1 185.2 137.6 211 

2 197.3 146.8 211.3 

3 206.2 153.1 205.2 

4 206.2 154.1 199.4 

5 208.5 157.1 191.7 

6 205 155.6 186.7 

7 207.7 153.1 186.1 

8 208.9 147.9 184.8 

9 212 142.2 178.5 

10 211.4 142.8 178.1 

11 217.6 142.7 177.9 

12 213.1 142.1 174.9 

13 211.8 141.7 173.7 

14 211 144.5 176 

15 217.6 142.2 175.7 

16 220.8 140.5 173.1 

17 225.8 139.7 174 

18 223.7 136.7 172.3 

19 217.1 132.3 166 

20 215.8 128.8 165 

21 209.7 129.6 164.7 

22 209 124.8 166.5 

23 213.6 129.5 173.4 

24 211.3 132.6 177.1 

25 214.7 127.2 180.7 

26 212 122.4 183.9 

27 209 120.2 190.2 

28 211.5 122.2 189.1 

29 213 116.8 187.1 

30 213.5 121.9 183.5 

Averages = 211.33 137.62 181.92 

0 

7dk' 
12/6/194 Nox Averages for the #4 Kiln Outlet 

Run #1 Run # 2 Run #3 

1 13.1 11.1 10.6 

2 13.2 11.1 10.6 

3 13 11.1 10.5 

4 13.3 11.2 10.5 

5 13.3 11 10.4 

6 13.1 10.9 10.5 

7 13.1 11.3 10.2 

8 12.9 11.2 9.9 

9 12.5 11.3 9.4 

10 12.3 11.2 9.1 

11 11.9 11.2 8.5 

12 11.8 10.9 8.3 

13 12.1 - 10.9 8.1 

14 12 10.9 8.1 

15 . 11.8 10.7 7.9 

16 11.7 10.7 7.8 

17 11.6 10.9 7.7 

18 11.5 10.7 7.6 

19 11.5 10.8 7.6 

20 11.4 10.7 7.6 

21 11.4 10.9 7.5 

22 11.4 11 7.3 

23 11.4 10.8 7.4 

24 11.6 10.8 7.2 

25 11.3 10.7 7.2 

26 11.4 10.7 7.1 

27 11.6 10.6 6.9 

28 11.5 10.9 6.7 

29 11.8 10.6 7.2 

30 11.7 10.6 8.1 

Averages e 12.073333333 10.91 8.45 

aP 
1216//94 S02 Averages for the .#4 Klin Outlet 

Run #1 Run # 2 Run #3 

1 50.7 36.7 27.8 

2 54.8 31.2 24.9 

3 49.2 26.1 22.2 

4 46.6 21.9 20.6 

5 43.1 19.6 21.3 

6 41.8 18.9 20.8 

7 43.6 19.6 20.3 

8 43.6 20.7 23.4 

9 42.6 19.9 25.4 

10 42.9 19.9 27 

11 38.9 20.9 27.7 

12 34.8 20.7 28.4 

13 34.3 21.4 31 

14 34.1 221 29.7 

15 31 20.8 31.5 

16 29.9 21.5 31.7 

17 30.6 22.6 31.5 

18 27.9 23.3 33.3 

19 27.7 24.7 33.3 

20 29.4 25.1 31 

21 27.9 27.2 32.1 

22 29.2 27.7 33.4 

23 29.6 28.7 32.8 

24 28.6 29.5 33.5 

25 29.1 29.6 36.1 

26 27.5 30.7 34.1 

27 28.5 29.5 34.4 

28 28.8 34.7 33.6 

29 30.2 35.4 33.7 

30 30 35.1 34.3 

Averages = 35.56 25.52 29.36 

..~ ~ 
Appendix "1" 

(VEO Readings & Certification Cards) 

c4mtzfcan EnvizonmznEaf 9zstin9 eorn#any ffnc. 

eezno, dvzvaL2 P40anzX, 474-uzonQ .&6 -fakr e~y, 2cEan' 

702-786-85S3 6o2-253-3354 80,- 266- 7111 
~~~ 

-~ 

J, 
~ 

., G - . 
~ 
rh,7L 

. 

~~ . fLI25 0I7L fiQl2~~ ~t2C. 

SCURCF NAME 

lntcrsfu Qu-4,+l 

LOGITTCN 

Lc1e'r t J e r~~u~' ~ c, 7T,1 /f 

MA21NG AOORESS . C1TY ST 

Lt 

PhlONE ~ I SCURCECONTiaCT 

J ;w. xC, l< 

Svl-ao6- 7»> 

Vlsib/e Emisslon F''eid Qxlmentatfon 

(

S~ 

MIN o 13 30 4,? 

1 

ATE 3 21P Z ~ C~ C ~ 

~ 3 

4 

S CP TTME 5 

y:~~ 

r7ATING MODE T ~ ~ p 

ATING MODE 8 ~`~ ' ~ 

9 

to I 

11 

'O CBSERVEa 

12 

OBSERVEa i3 

14 I 

~ 15 

TlNUCUS 1'$ 16 

M177EN7 G tT 

CHED G 

ex;+. 

19 ( I 

`17 

21 

WIND SPE?D ~ I I p ~ e 

2J 

RH. I I I percent 

2° I I 

~ 

'-s 

rdw NOrtA Arrpw 2-1 I ' 

2T I 

28 I I 

29 

3o 

AVE-'?AGE OPACTIY FCR 

OBSE.~VATICN G4TF START T1ME o 

JZ—o5- 9y 9:30 

PRCCFSS ECUIPME~IT FUEL TYPE OPE 

'~' ~ B /` ~ `c% Pro f o c4.•o/i ~ %~ {r;G /~ 

CONTRCL ECUlPMF. jVT OPEq 

BCt ~ia tJi~ ~C/ ~~C~iy LiMe`~ q ~ 

CESCRlBE E.LflSS10N PCINT 

.E~l~ ~- ~i'o.-ti Fa.~ l~%u~J• ri 

HEIGHT ABOVE GRCUND L..=VEL HEIGHT RELATIVE ~ y Fr et y F~ ~7L 

OISTANCE FROM OBSF.r~VEF7 D/RECTICN FRCM 

Z- O.~e a ~ c rfl, (.~i cS f" 

DESCRIBE c'1NISSlONS 

W I~ , t-a / bccre ly Ui.c ~ 6r ~ i~~t~ a I1 

E~fISSlON COLOR PL!!ME 7YFE CON 

~cJ ~^• ~ /4^ FUGITJVE G INTEA 

WATER ORCRLETS PRESF-NT. 1F WATGR CRCPLc'T 

NO YES O 1ATrACHED G CETA 

fW int in the Plume at Which Opaclty was CetermineC 

S~•ek ~~ c, s~cfe~ a~un7 f/ore ~.~ 

OESCRIBE 34CX RCUND etc.~ 

, 

G/ ce.t S, e ~ f~ 

Si(YCCNClTIC S aND CCLOR 

G/'a 

lwllycctRzcl-ICNI 

C fot+ l w. Q ^J. Ld_ 

AMB1E'VT TE:NPEAA7URE WEi 3UL9 rEMP. I 

~~~ t ~ SOURC~c L4YCtJf SXEZ'H D 

P►ume 

Sun 

w►nd 

E~n~~iorr Pbint 

0 

Ty ~ dcfS ~ 

n 

ryi .33:0 ~ 

pc;N.4— 

---~ 

~..~ .... 

u{- T-S J,-~~C 

COMMENTS (Descrrbe Obaervatlon Fbinq 

Ob~ens~a Asaitton • 

j h e e X; - ~- o-F -}~ ~. e F~~. 1-~o ~:~, 

---- ~~e ~ "~ ~ C~ r e < ~t ~ ~ u ~ ~ • ~ u~-F ~.6 ~ ~. +— y r ~ ~ 

su~ coarlon cx. ~ 

reu,. cl ._( uJ e cf f ~'~ 

CBSlAVEr'75 I 

e e v~~ a.(' a bu ~lL q t e~ L . + d ~ 

ces~. s sr CATE 

/7- - oS-9LI 

CRCaN1Z,4T1CN 

A. c .i: La .D F— CL ~~ -9y 

~ 

~~, 
DESCRlBE BACxGRCUND (Co/or, etc) 

~rc-ev~ S-, dE C'F Qc.i /4" 21 

S~ ~C NCtTTO S~1 ND~COLOR 

L~ 

W1NC 01REC7 CN 

w~iW/ND SPE_D 

i o-~s~o~ 

22 I I I 

23 AMB/E'VT TE,LfPEF7ATURE WET BULB TEbIP. RH. peroenf I I I 

SraGr SOUACE LArcurBxFCH oraw• No m Anow 

w;rn 

S ~ Wtno 

Emrs~lor► Pbrrrr 

2-1 

• 

- 

~ 

27 ~ ( 

28 I 

29 

X 

AVE4AGE OPACJTY FOR 

H/GHEST PE71C0 

CCMMENTS (Ceacrrbe Observatlon Point) 

a,,•~ p ~c 

I 

_. _ - T_ _ _ • /j 

~~ tCl29 017L~Q12L1~ J12C. For-266-7Tr7 

~l Vlaible FmissJon F{s!d Obcumentatforn 

SCURCF NAME n gK 

M!N 0 13 30 <q 

LCCATlON 

Lcl e.s -t ~-~ r ~t 4,.~ urA l-F 1 G I 0 O I C 

MAIL/NG ADDRESS , C1TY STATF & Z/P Z ~ O I ~ 0 

crr.~~ 3 0 o c o 

PHCNEN ^URCFCCNTACT 

~J ,M 1CecvOBSc'r?VA770N CIATE s o G c O 

/2 -Cr- 9l 

START TlME STt7P TJME 

li;2.0 11:Z6 8 v C C O 

PRCCFSS ECUlPMENT 

w- L! 8rr ~- L PrbdaCff`eH 

FtlEL TYPE IOPErZ477NG MODE 

G/ecf~~c /--u // 

7 

CCNTRCL ECUlPME1VT OPE3ATJNG MCDE g 

DESCRlBE EMISSION PCINT 10 ~ AE~Xr 4- '~r'o..~ 1=a,,c J~o Ks ~ ~ ~ • fi t~ i'sS ; c ~c o, n-k 

I HE;Gt+T A80VE GRCUND LEVEL 

y ~--t 'e -fHEIGHT RELATIVE Tt7 06SERVE.R 

y ~ c 7- iz 

DISTANCE FRCM OBSc'RVEFI 

Zo 7- 

D1RKT7CN FRCM OBSFRVE3 

/V o/• fk LveS t 

13 

14 _ ~ 

DESCRIBE EM1SS10NS 

r,oh ~ 1-e h-e-1 u ~ s: 61e i` ~'a f 4 1/ is 

EMlSS1CN COLOR 

lir k+ f-e 1;4a,4 

PLUMETYPE CONTINUCUS 

FUG/T1VE Q pVTERMITTENT Q 

is I 

17 I I Wi4TER CROPL_°TS PRESENT. 

NO 41- YES Q 1ATrACRED 

IF WATEr'i ORCPL..°T PLUME: 

Q CE'ACHE:7 CG 18 

F,Z K 

No uJ t' 

Poirrt rn ttre Plume at Whrch Cpat~ty was Cetermined ig 

l ,S f4 c K Qf ~ a rC e ft ¢ r a wcf. -~rcwn h~.~ ., Ex 20 o V eP v I ~ e ~ ~ c f 

QQ++rrer~ Po~ltlon 

1404,

~~ !'rA.5f y clfjcf' 

Sun I~@ 

CsSErWERS MAJiE(Prtnq 

~dd `~~i e,.~ ~u 9 ~ rrc~~ bQckg ~oan~~ 

Iz-os-9 

I

CRGAN/t.',~TTON ` ' ~ CF:~TIFE7 d7 

,~ . G, / Uo ~~ 11/~ 

--217-7> 
'N 

Obvsoara A6sIHon 

sol-266-7171 - -T--- 

SCURCF NAME 

Siafers~a c # fe 13 /` ~ (~ !~ arc 3 

S 

MIN

~ 

 0 15 I 30 45 

LOC.ATTCN 

WeS'1~ Co ~ ~~«,1 C.CTA ML 

1 p c c c^ 

Z~ o o+ G p MAIL/NG AQQRESS C17Y STATE dc 21P 

uTf! ff 3 0 o( o o 

PHCNE I SCURCE C.7NTACT 

1( c c lL 

4 C. o l c- + C 

5 o C+ c+ C 08Sc'RS/ATION CATE SiART 

lZ — o,S- 9'-1 I T1ME 

l•' o a om 1 S~P 77ME 

/; D 6 ;•. e o c+ C ~ 

PRCCFSS ECUIPMENT r 

#~ H 6 ~ tcic /~ rodkc ~, o., 

Fi1EL TYPE OPEr3ATlNG MOQE 

)SlC,fr,`c l=oa !I 

7 

e 

CONTROL ECUIPMEVT OPEaATiNG MODB 

IQ r_ ~i e u F e ~7 e - C 'l ~ ~`.► e ~~1 ~ca 

DESCRIBE c':NlSSION PCINT 

,EX i4' AP c , H-O U,( r H 

10 I ! 

11 I hlE1GH7 ABCVE GRCUND LEl/EL l 

q Tz z f 

NEIGI-IT RELATIVE Tl7 08Sc'rTVER 

yFf e f 12 ~ OlS'ANCE FROM OBSEAVER 

2.o f 

OlRECT1CN FRCM OBSc'RVER 

)1/c9r+K 

13 

DESCAIBE E ~+ SS/0N5 l° 

QaTe l u ~ s ~ b/ei~` ~, rL Q ~ / 15 I I I I 

EL11SS1CN CCLOR PLLIMETYPE CONT/NUCUS 4L 

FUGITJVE C INTEr?MIT i ENT C 

1s I ( ~ 17 I I I 

I 

WATER QAOPLE'3 PRESc'NT. IF WATER OROPL—Fi PLUME I 

Pc n4- 

- 

NO,;s~ YES C ATTACNEQ C CtTACf.I EQ C 18 I o v 

~ ~ C 

T 

I 

26 

Pofrrt fn ttle Plume at WhiCh Opac: ty wai Cetermkred 

I S 4crc 1,1- p i a, •e4-~ QLi 0. ~ ~ ~..t P. K e x ;-f~ 

18 I ( I 

~p QESCRIBE EACXGRCUND (Color, atc l 

(S b c i Ic1 i rt Ct 21 I ( I I 

SXYCCNCITIC 4,aN0 G7LOR 

C/o4dy ~lJ ur ~ CGrc, 

W/NQ O/RECT! WINQ S?E=D 

 ~ ~ 

2-7 

~ + ~ + 

AM81E'VT TE'+•1PERATiJRE 

y~ °F 

WE! aULS TEMP. 

-— 

AN. rer ~ent 

Za 

Stxu ~ SOURCE L,U'CUTSXLrCl4 Draw Nortlt Arrow 

witn 

{MnQ ~ 

Eml~lort Point 

~ _ t 

27 

 18 ~ 

2-0 I 

30 ( 

AVE4AGE OPACITY FCR 

Sun CoGrlorr cine 

~ ur< 

/ odd SO"L 16 u-lJ1'0 q CS re@ I-) as ci b lic~~yrc uHJCBSERVER'S DaTE 

/z — os-- q 

I

CRGA N1Z4TICN CcRT/FiErJ 9Y CATe' 

A E . 

 ~ : I k110F(:!~ 110 - C,y 

CCMMENTS (Descrrbe CbservaUon FbiRq 

I %Ae e.Y ~ + o+ +'.Q 

6rce rc.LS ~ 1 d cxcf c, bc" 4- 1 

F-c e f q bev-e f (^ie rc,o d , -T d -~t.e 
~ 

• 7~~ fcnc~ om/2ar_y, 

SCt1RCF NAME 

— ~ %~ —'•5 1 < B 1 < ~Q f M/N 0 15 30 43 

LCGiT10N 

g r f Gk Crus ~< r C~r•~ z Z I 

1 ~ C C O 

MAlUNG AOORESS . C1TY STATE 3 Z!P Z ~ O p( O 

PHONE# SaURCFC."7N7AC7 ~ 

5 

CD OBSERVATICN D4TE 

jZ —C✓ 6— 9 

SrART nME 

lI ;30 

S TCP TfME 

~i ~ 36 e d o 0 0 

PROCFSS ECUIPMEIVT F„-; LzIr FUEL TYPE 

8 l'i G ~G /` Cd S 1+T `k( /`i C 

OPEt~AT1NG MODE 

/C 4 l' 

T 7~,1, 0 

g 

CCNTRCL ECUIPMENT OPrRATJNG MOOE 

A;u fl 9 

DL; IBE ELIISSION POlNT 

C` VLrtG( dw Lty 4AC 6rCLW-1 

10 

---- 

S07-2~''6-7171 

Visibie Ernlsalen P~ DoclmentatloR 

HEIGHTABOVEGRO NDLEVEL 

L/ Fc-c 7` 

HEIGHTRELATIVETDOBSERVER 

S FC. e. 

11 ga t 

F/1 

u 

L 

L 

0 

w 

 / 

~~ J 

Li 

17 

~ f 

12 

DISTANCE F_ROM OBSc'RVER 13 

Z.$' f' z r f 

DIRECTION FROM 08.SERVER ^,)or f'K 

DESCRIBE EiLfl IONS 14 

V C I` joZ".• i-p cc.~ y~ 'f -« 

~flSS N C LOR i8 I 

c... 

PLlJME TYPE CONTINUCUS j$' 

FUGITlVE Q INTEr':MITTENT Q 

WATER OR OPL F iS PRESENT. IF W4 TER OROPLET PLUME iT 

NO X YES L-1 

1g 

ATrACHED Q DEiACHED C 

Pbint fn the Plume at Wh1ch Cpecity waa Determined /1 l , 

" a,« e f r ✓ Q GlJa 1 nc~ e~ o f d-'F t✓ u c 7~ 10 DESCRIBE 8&1CXGRCUND ( lor, etca 

Brct,u., 1 

SiCY CON0177ONS ANO COLOR 

c ! o c.c c~ ~ 

WIND Cl ECTION 

oU • r - 

WINO SPEED 

~ 

/o !~5 0`~°~` 

AMBIENT T _ E~b1PERA7LRE. 

3 8e-fWEi BULB TEMP. 

~ 

RH. peloent 

24 

ZJ5 SIiCU ~ $atARt".Flr4Yt'UTSltE~~t Or~1VNOIMtAROW 

with 

plYfffe 

sw ~ 

W1lQ 

~~~~'Eml~Jlon ~inl 

- 

CEwr MS Pzt/Ger► 

-- 

`

'4°e '

~ 

U~ UM 

26 

27 

. 

29 

29 

.'10 

AVERAGE 

HIGHEST 

OPACIfY 

PERIOD . 

FCR 

CCMME1I7S (Descrrbe ODservaUon Pbintq 

vL,-;4re au~- ~.~. 

ro6 a bl bpcau,s'e c f 

P u. ~ r F c kJ , 

08SFRVEa ME(PtiRqT~> 

./ / v c~ ~ ~ • ~,K7,~/~ S ° H 

OBSc r?i/ERS SI 

~ 

A RE 

% 

CWTE 

~ z -~-9y ~ CRCaNIZAflON 

7' 

CF--T1F E:7 BY OATE 

x~ 
'N 

bcjOCO 

~ Vlaible E-nlaslon FsJd DbcJmentatforr 

SCURCF NAME ~J SEC k I MIN 0 1$ ~ 30 I6 

LOC.zTION 1 O I o I e 1,0 — 8 t; ck- C 

MA/LlNG ADDRESS , c17 y ,g;,~~ & zIP 2 ~7 O 

 3o c c' O

PHCNEM SCURCFCv^NTAC1 4 

4171~fly 

J ;,„ Ko --(c 

CBScR/A770N QATE STAR7'77ME SOP T1ME S6 D e+ o 

/Z-oG- 9y /: tio PnK /:y6 rrK 6 p a o© 

PRCCFS.S ECUIPMENT FUEL TYPE CPErZ477NG MCCE 7 1 6 <<zz 0 lyBr.; .k Crr.s1.er £'/erlrr /=u I/ 

CON7ROL EOUlPMENT CPE4ATING MCOE 8 

,,s FG l / 9 ( ~ DESGRIBE E.VISSICN POINT 10 ( 

ou.~o( G i4 ~« ,-~ Gc r., ~t ftir Gr cu,~( 

~ s e 

HEIGHTABOVE GRCUNDLEVEL HEIGHTRELATIVE MCBSc'RVErT 11 ~ 

y I'c'z 4- v'` f=c ef- 12 

DISTANCE FRCM 08Sc'.RVER DIREC710N FRCM OBSEr?VEea 13 

-zo ~ z f IV. F . 

DESCRIBE EMISSlONS 14 I 

L r k ~-U e t` ' 7oc ur ca ~- a ~/ 

EMlSSlON COLOR PLUME 7YPE CaN71NU0US ~$' 16 I I 

Tu..^ F{lG177VE Q INTERMlTI ENT Q f7 I 

WATFRdRCPLEiSPRESEN7;IFWATEADRCPL°i PLLIME 

NO YES O ATrACHED L7 CETaCHED G 18 ~ 1 

ftnt in tRe Plurrre at Which Opacfty waa Cetermined 19 I ~ 

I c~ ru ~«eft!` away `~re~ ~5~ c(c ear~ 

DESCRIBE BACKGRCUND (Co/cr, etcj ~ ( 

" f -e of 8r,cl'-s ircw• ✓L 21 

SKYCONCtTlCNSANDCaLOR WI CC/RECTION WINDSPE20 22 I I 

C/ G reLy ~li , EE . I (,3'-Z o /►+ fN 

AM81E'VT reMPEAATURE WET BULB rEMP. RH. per ~~ ~ nt 

- ~ Z -r ~-- 24 I i 

Sracu SCURCF LAYCUT SXE-MM Draw Nartlt Am7w 25 • 

wiUf 

26 Plwrre 

Sun 

Wirtd ~ 28 

Emission Fbint 

29 

-V 

AVERAGE OPAClTY FOR 

HIGHEST PERIOQ 

CCMMENTS (Deacrrbe Cbaervadon PWnq 

Odsnera Pkbltton 

c 

%cJ'F 

T't P'fs 

m 

1400 

~ I sun cocanon L;n. 

UFl~ );'F'Hl.i -rL1uc+ ~ 

4I 1 y 'Fra ,rA -exc-e S,S vxo , *,r,lL, 

I C~8% o'R NAAJ~ ijes ~ C.aTE 

/Z. -C 

n ~~ 
~ 

7~ <f~ r_cJ ~om~ant J -Y r_c. / 

V/sib/e E17/sslon FTs/d DocLmantatlon 

bUl - 2ri0 - 7T71 

SOURCF NAME SEC 

er i ck R u" 0 3 M!N 0 15 1 ,70 1 45 1 

LOCAT10N 

t

2C ,rrY STArE a Z)P

urAti p I p I o 

iOURCF CCNTACT 

c~ )~ Krc!! 4 O O I 6 O 

5 I o ~ O o iTART TIME 

3:10 P M 

STCP TlME 

3:1(Cl pM 6 o p 

Ft/EL TYPE OPERAT)NG MCDE ~ 

Bf'ickCrwl,er G r ,E/ecFpP c 

~ 

~'- 'le 

CC 9 ~N1 7RCL rFCUIPMENT OPFcA ~/ MODE 

/,cC 

DESCA18E EM1SS/0N PO1NT 

R ok,ec~ 6ra ~u c f (~o ~ n ~ard ftie Grou. ~( 11 

10 

~~

~ 

AA 

HEiGHT ABOVE GR UND LEVEL 

yF-C ct 

HEIG97 RELATlVE Tt7 CBSERVEFi 

6 F~--cf 12 

D/STANCE FROM OBSEtaVER 

Z o F~z 

DIRECT/0N FRCM OBSE4VER 

 ~! . E . 

13 

DESCRIBE EMr 10NS 14 

Ve r ) i 1fle i a nr a f G/~ 1s 

EMISSICN COLOR 

7-c` ,c 

PLUME TYPE CONTINUOUS aC 

FUGJTIVE Q lNTERMITT ENT Q 

16 I I 

WATEr~ DRCPLc i3 PRESEiV7.° 1 T I I I 

NO 9L YES u 

1FWATEr? DRCPLET PLUME 

ATTACHED rJ DETACHED C7 18 

Fbint irt the P ume at Which Opacity was Detetmined 

J cl ~ a vle ,Fe r' cL wc. irrcr..+ ex: i- of ,Ok cf 

19 

~ I ~ DESCR/BE S.zCXUD (Color etc.) 

B f-o w ~ o ~~a%~in i n~(,e ol :S`1'QHc ~ 21 

SKY CONDlTT NS AND COLOR 

Paril Clc ~ d 

W/ND DlRECT/ON 

N. E. 

WIND SPEED 

/o-rSr+oX 

22 I 

~ 

I I 

AMBIENT TEMPEAATUAE 

i/ Z ° F 

WE; BULB TEMP. RH. pe>cent 

24 

~1M ~ 

wrna ~ 

P►ums 

S un 

SOURCE LAYt7UT SKL~'7CN Oraw Norrh Anow 

G 

Z5 • 

?6 

ZT I 

ADORESS 

PHONE,M 

OBSEr?VATJON DATE 

po~ ~ 

28 

FmWlon Pbint 

29 

~ X 

AVEFtAGE OPACITY FOR 

,.: H/GHEST PERIOD 

COMMENTS (Desctibe Observatlon Point) 

, Obsene a Ru/tlon 

o.rtl y QnV V ~.~ i b~ r Cw~ 

~140e r \ 

Ct 7' ¢ / f ` 

sun Loeatton une 

c uC14 E (,u 0-4 f'► e~ 44 i•'l 

L

OBT JRS N~ E(Prin~~ qa/~''( 

f--yv► E i J T ~l!' ~ • 

DATE 

/Z -O a 

rOA~N! ~ ON I CEATlUE~ ~ Q 

I~0 - .91/ I 

-9 / il 
l, 
~/ 

J~ 
rz c-*z.cca.n GncTCZOnm_ ~ nccL ~ 

sfLn9 ~omt-any, J/na. 

I 

c

1~ ParcEsfi at)~ 2CEa4 8¢66o 

So1-266-7111 

Vlalb/e Emlsalon FFeid Dbcumentatlon 

SCURCVAMfi SFC 

IMIN 

~ 

d 

O 

I 

I 

I 

FOR 

vIU 

O 

s 

~ S 

I 

- 

~ 

~ f 

• '00~ 

6 10 

1

LOC.~TJON 

, 

1 2 - a 

MA/L.NG AOC EaS CJTY S'iAT E 3 Z1P ~ ~ ~~ ~ I 

PHCNE.I SOW Eq ACT .• ~ ~ S-- 

OBSE.RVATlON G1TE 5 -3 ~ 

C 

~A TIME 

/.~ 

SlOP TlME 1 /504 6 S'- 

PA FSS QUlP ENT Pue TYPB CPE TlNG MO E T 

8 

CONTROL (lP ENT 'bPERATING ME 

g 

OESCRIBE EM/SS10N PqIN7 rQ 

1J 

H T ABOVE GROUNO LEVEL 

S' 

HElGHT RELATfVE 37 OBSERVER 

— 12 

0157ANCF FAOM 08SERVER OlRECT1CN FRCM 08SERVER 13 I 

. r4 OESCR! E EN/S610NS 

~ ~ , ' 15 

lSS10 C 

A 

PCl1ME TYPE C NUOUS~(,^ 

FUGlTTVE O INTERMITTENT Q 

16 1 1 

17 I WAT r'f OROPL.°TS PRESEiVT• 

NO G YES l ArrACHED 

!F WATEr? OAOPL~ PLUME 

ETACHED Q 18 , 

Parnt ! lRe Plume sf fctt Opaclty was Oetefmfned ig I 

^R1BE CXGA NO ( or, etc.) 

~ 21 

( 

~ 

KY CCNO! bN5 aN CC A 

, 

wINO QIAE ON wrNO SPEED 

l 1e~ - J~-d 

22 + + 

2S ( 

MBIEivT~,NPERATi1RE WET BULS rEMP. I RKpercent 

24 

( 

StsrJr SCURCE LAYCUTSXE704 Oraw Non1t Anow 

wftA 

Plurrr~ 

Sun ~ ~ 

Whd 

~ 

r 

~ 

 Emla„bn ~lJlnt~ 

G1Nsr+ers f~tlflbr~ 

----= - - 

Sun Cocatron Une 

25 

26 

77 

ZB 

29 

30 

AVEFlAGE 

HIGHEST 

OPACJTY 

PEaf00 

COMME.NTS (Oescrfbe Obaerva(/on Pblrtt) 

~ ~ 

OBSERVE 5 NAME(Pr r~l. + 

~,/D/1~•~Sd,✓ 

OBSERVERS slGNATUA pATE 

I Cc 

7ns ~• r- ~~i 

~ BY

~ ~ .~ 7~~I O0/E 

@0 

N 
STATE OF UTAH . 

D1VIStON OF AIR OUAUTY ' 

This eensees that RYAN BEVSON ' r 

. ,>s~•y ~ r 

has suocaaatully eampleted fhe V(s>bts Enissions Evaluadon. ~ 

Course conokrGed bX ther~jivisianof AUCwUty and has met the r minimum roquir sments r n~rg oq e`va~lLate visible emissions. r 

aceording to EPA Me 

Dira~or. Dtvisfoir of Air Oualtty ; 

vand mw _ APR 19 1995 ~ 

~ r r r .r ~ ~ ri r r r r ~ ~•r r .r ..•~at r ~ i. ~ ~ _ ~ _ . 

STATE OF UTAH S —i ATE OF UTAH 

DIVISiON OF AIR CUAU7Y DIVISiCN OF AIR CUAUTY 

This cardfies that RICK HAWKINS This cerafles that TODD BENSON 

has sucoessfully completed the Visible Emissions Evaluation 

Course conducted by the Oivision of Air Cuality and has met the 

minimum n3quirements necessary to evaivate visible emissions. 

according to E?A Me 

Oirecaor. Oivisio o Cuality 

Valid untrl 1+1fr7[ 20 'M--- 

has suc; essfully campleted the Visfbie Emissions Evaluatiort 

Course conduc:ed by the Oivision of Air Cuatity and has met the 

minimum requirements necassarv to evaluate visible emissiorts. 

acconying to E? 9. 

Direc:or. Oivision ot Air Cuality 

Valid until ArR 2 II 1Q-9-F 

a~ ~ • r.~r ~ ~ ~ . . . .. . - . - 

.. 

a. ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ .. -. . . t..: ~.~ ~ ~ s. ~ ` s ~ 1 ~a•r ~ .. + 

-_ • .I 

STATE OF UTAH ~ 

DIV1SiON OF AIR CUAU7Y ~ 

This cerdfles that DAVID HUNT 

': • .:.....- ~— 

has successfully completed ttte Vrs+ble. Emissions Evaluatlon 

Cawse conducsed by the Oirisionaf Aic_ OAry attd hea met the 

minimum f9QUlremeRtSllaCa33arY :1D ev2GJ .^ ~Le vlStble emis3ions. 

~ •• :+ •,ii according oo EPA wx--~~J 

Dtrecaor, Otvisian o A ~ c 

VaAd untll 

STATE OF UTAH 

DIV1Si0N OF AIR OUAUTY . 

This cartifies that JD SC~iILLER 

has suaeessfully eomplated the Visible ~Emissions Evaluat[on 

Course conduC.ed by tha Dh(irion o( Aic`OuaBty and has met the 

• minimum nequirementsnac`essarlCEa.eva ~ats'^s~1e emissions. 

arxordtng oo E.°A g_3i~;rl# . 

Dlrectar, Dlvision;ot Aict7wlUy : . 

Valid untU 

• ~1~ ~ 
CARL KOONTZ ASSOCIATES 

of Nashville, Tennessee 

This is to acknowledge that 

G',2 i= C. E. ) oA nf 5 vAl 

successfully parti ipated in Visible issions 

training on N 0' r~y--~19~9 

and is qualified to evaluate Visible Emissions 

for a period of six (6) months from the date of 

cenYficatlon. 

Instructor 41111f 

CARL KOONTZ ASSOCIATES 

of Nashville, Tennessee 

This is to acknowledge that 

J- eAa. 3ENS0AI 

successfully p c ~ pated in Visible Emissions 

training on ~6-4*" 

and is qualified to evaluate Visible Emissions 

for a period of six (6) months from the date of 

certification. 

Instructor ~ 

CARL KOONTZ ASSOCIATES 

of Nashv~lle, Tennessee 

This is to acknowledge that 

V. a2EALT BEAISo,d 

successfully par.ttF ipated in Visible Emissions 

training on N Oy' 44 /99 !4 

= and is qualified to evaluate Visible Emissions 

for a period of six (6) months from ttie date of 

certlftcatfon. 

Instructor 

~l I / 
Appendix "J" 

(Calibration Data) 

o¢irsazican EnvEwnmantaf ~:Zcstln9 eorrx#any fftzc. 

cJQtno, tNevac& J~{~sotnEac, Ausona .&A _CJS eity, VE,2.4 

702-786-81.13 6o2-253-3354 801-266-7111 
Amefican Environmental TesKing Company, Inc. 

SoS So uth 8 irch D rive 

Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 260-7111 

Company: : ~t i~~ . ~.~T~ ~: . .. ~ ~ ~ Date: 

So urce :~'~` `/ .~: ,/~.. Ca lib rated By: !' , -7 

r ; 

NaZZLF CALIBRATION 

Z- 6-4Y 

Nozzle 

IdentfAcatton 

Number 

Dy 

(ln. ) 

D2 

(in. ) 

Ds 

(in. ) 

AD 

(in. ) 

D average 

~ .sdr 

~ 

i~ 

- , ,• d-s'oi o•S'o1 o.oao o-so? 

f 'r 

~t/Z_~ ~•Sd L G . ~o ~ p.5oa d ~ oo z p •S O/ 

Where : 

D1,2,3 = Nozzie diameter measunad on a different diameter, (ln.). 

Tolerance - measure within 0.001 inches (0.25 mm). 

eD = Maxim um dif'ference in any two measurements, (in. ). 

To!esance =0.0041nches (0.1 mm). 

D average = Average of Di, Dz D3. 

nr-1 
Amefican Environmental Testing Company, Inc_ 

565 So uth Birch D rive 

j • Spanish Fork, Uttah 84660 

(801) 266-7111 

Company:h_ ~ %~v~ Date: 

, 

Source: Calibrated By: • ~-~ 

NOZZLF CALIBAATION 

Nozzle 

ldenttflcattoh 

Number 

Dy 

(ln. ) 

D2 

(in. ) 

Ds 

(ln. ) 

eD 

(in. ) 

D average 

~ . )3S ~ 3 -1 ~l ~ .13 ~5 D .~o G 

D , ~ 35 b, l 3 ~( b. ~ 35 D. ooI p. 13L1$ 

Where: 

D1,Z3 = Nozzie diameter measured on a different diameter, (in.). 

Toterance =-measure wiihin 0.001 inches (0.25 mm). 

,&D = Maxim um difference In any two measurements, (tn. ). 

Tolerrance,=0.0041nches (0.1 mm). 

D average - Average of Di, D2, D3. 

-~ i P-"' 
Amefican Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

505 So uth B irch D rive 

Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 

(801) 250-7111 

Company: ' ~-~ Date: 

So urce: D G ~ 3~a.~~~~ Callbrated By: U~•~• 

iV4ZZLF CALIBRATION 

.~ 

~ 

1:F~ 

~ 

Nozzle 

IdenttAcatfon 

hlumber 

Dy 

(In. ) 

D2 

(in. ) 

D3 

(in. ) 

eD 

(in. ) 

D average 

~s o. a~.j c,. a•s a.a~s o. ~~s o. ~od o.a ~ sl/ ~j. /S ~j. /S O • /S O . /.S O . GCC O. / 

t~.--2 1s v. ~~y ~~~.~ ' 

~ 

~ •d 

p./S 

p.

Y+rhere : 

D1,2.3 = Nozzfe diameter measun:d on a different diameter, (in.). 

Tolerance p. measure wfthin 0.001 inches (0.25 mm). 

&,D = Maxlm um difterence in any two measurements, (in. ~ 

Tderar:ce =0.044 inches (0.1 mm). 

D average = Avefage of Di, D2, Ds. 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc_ 

r-ZZ Sa uth Birch D rive 

 • Spanish Fork, Ufiah 846560 

(801) 266-7111 

n . 

Co mpany: Date: i.?- S- F 5;,** 

Source: ~y OC ~-s~•~~ Calibrated By: ~ /7 

~ 

NOZZLE CALIBRAT1aN 

Nozzie Di _ D2 D3 aD D average 

identfflcation . (in. ) (in. ) (in. ) (in. ) 

Number 

-4 f 

~.tx r 

. 

6.~A~' 0.~~~ o.00 ~ o.R~~ 

0B 

~~dL p.2 p.2, 1 6 0. 0v 0...Z16 

.~ 

~43 ,Zr(o 6.Z./1P v.vc,c, v•z i6 

Where: 

Dl,2,3 = Nozzle d'rameter measured on a diiferent diameter, (in.). 

Tolerance -- measure within 0.001 inches (0.25 mm). 

,6D = Maxim um difterence ln any two measurements, (in. ). 

Tolerance =0.004 Inches (0.1 mm). 

D average = AYerage oi Di, D2, D3. 

~,'V) 
American Estvironmental Te3ting ComQany, Inc. 

565 South 8irch Drive Spanish Fvric, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-SSa3 (801) 260'-7111 

Meter 8ox Calibration Data Farm 

(Ezglish Units) 

Date Baremetric Pressure Meter 6ox Nurrtter 

9/19194 25.55 RAC #2824 

Average Yi Averaqe AH Cali rated 8v _ Std. Meter Yi 

0.917 1.613 BAL - GEJ 0.99497 

Orfica Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter aH113.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting d-i (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) F13 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

0.50 4.53 5 70 0.03676 69 

68 

1.00 4.62 5 70 0.07353 69.5 

69 

1.50 9.101, 10 70 0.11029 69.5 

69 

200 8.942 10' 68 0.14706 68.5 

69 

3.00 8.794 10 69 0.2059 69 

69 

4.00 8.794 10 69 0.29412 69 

69 

Dry Gas Meter 

_ Inlet Outtet Average Time ID 

(Td ij°F (Td o) 'F (Td) °F Minutes Y aFi 

69 73 74.50 9.95 0.9095 1.5669 

73 83 

.74 84 81.25 7.117 0.9371 1.5251 

77 90 

75 87 83.50 11.914 0.9255 1.6452 

79 93 

77 -91 86.75 10.067 0.9152 1.6067 

81 98 

82 99 9200 8275 0.9052 1.6708 

85 102 ' 

86 102 95.00 7.167 0.9075 1.6621 

88 104 

Average Y Average aH 

0.917 1.613 

aM 
- -•--• •-- -- -..,......._. - - -- - ...r-••1 •---- 

565 South Birch Drive Spaniah Fcrk, Utah 84660 

(801) 7984553 (801) 250-7111 

Meter Bax Calibration Oata Form 

Oate 

(Englistt Units) 

--

Rarametdc Pressure Meter 8ox Number 

9/29/94 25.62 RAC #145-569 

Averace Yi Average _~_ ~ Caiibrated Bv Std, Meter Yi 

0.998 1.748 BAL - GEJ o.99497 

Orfice Martometer Standard Meter Dry Gaa Meter Wet Test Meter aHJ13.6 Wet Test Meter 

SettEng aH (Vw) FI9 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) -F Average Temp. 

;- 

0.50 4.853 5 67 0.03676 67 

67 

1.00 4.802 5 67 0.07353 67 

67 

1.50 9.667 10 66 0.11029 66.5 

67 

2.00 9.637 10 60" 0.14706 66.5 

67 

3.00 9.594 10 67 0.22059 67 

67 

4.00 9.605 10 67 0.29412 67 

67 

Ory Gas Meter 

_ Inlet OuBet Average Time D 

(Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Y nH 

71 - 92 8200 11.183 0.9918 1.6833 

74 91 

76 93 85.50 8.05 0.9863 1.7703 

78 95 

. 79 95 89.50 12.894 0.9996 1.6657 

82 102 

82 100 9325 11.517 1.0018 1.7708 

85 106 `°:, 

86 107 97.75 9.417 1.0016 1.7808 

89 109 

89 110 100.25 8.267 1.0044 1.8175 

91 111 

Average Yt Average aFl 

C.998 1.748 

,-Z~ 
50'S 5auth 81rc;t prtve Spanian rcrx, utacf 84scu 

(801) 798-a5o3 (301) 256-7111 

~ Meter 8ox Calibration Data Form 

(E.Zglish Units) 

Oate Barornetric Pressur9 _ Merer Rex Nurrrber 

9/19/94 . 25.71 Ca *(C97) 

Average Yi _ Avrage d_ Cafbrated 8v Std. Meter Y1 

'1.C85 1.849 BAL • GcJ 0.99497 

Drfice Manameter Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter A}-f/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setdng aH 

•. T 

'(Wv) FCi 

' 

(Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F 

. 

Average Temp. 

0.50 5.4 5 60 0.03676 66 

' 60 

1.00 5.54 5 68 0.07353 

. 

66.5 

~

, 

, 1.50 10.95 10 67 0.11029 67 

• 67 

~ 200 10.84 10 67.5 0.14706 67.75 

68 

3.00 10.99 10 68.5 022C59 68.5 

63.5 

4.00 11.03 10 68.5 0.29412 68.5 

68.5 

Dry Gas Meter 

Cutlet Average Time fl 

(Td o) 'F (Td) °F Mirtutes Y 4!-t 

67 67.50 1281 1.0761 1.8196 

67 

67 6825 929 1.1C29 1.8194 

68 . 

68 68.75 14.91 , 1.0785 1.8345 

68 • 

68 69.25 13.001 .1.0755 1.8607 

69 

71 70.50 10.78 1.0883 1.8738 

71 

72 71.50 9.4 1.0912 1.8824 

72 

Average Yi Average aH 

1.065 1.849 

~,~3 
'A' Side Cailbr.don 

Run Number P std P s 

_ G-rt hi20 = H20 

(inches H20) (tnches H20) 

1 0.4 0.365 

2 0.38 0.54 

.3 0.4 0~ 

Average: 

'8' Stde Caiibralion 

Run Number P std P s 

crtt H20 = Ei20 

(nches H20) (inches H20) 

1 0.36 0.51 

2 0.35 0.49 

3 0.35 0.49 

Average: 

: 

. , 

Ca 

(S) 

0.8402 

0.8452 

0.8452 

Deviation 

-0.00332 

0.00160" 

O.00t 6v 

Cp 

(S) 

0.8414 

0.8389 

0.837? 

Deviation 

0.00208 

-C.00046 

-0.00162 

O.3'393 

565 Sauth 8irc:t Drive Spanish Fcric, Utah 8456a 

(801) 798-3533 (801 ) 266-71 11 

P'ttot Tub C atbrati n For m

Etot Tube Iderrtifitcattcn NumbRr- V. A. _ lo u - g 

Calbrated By- RflB - ,1DS 

A a s Average 0.8414 

-~ AV 
QvQ aauiti tyarrua ucive apaMQ.fi •••• ^, v ~an a.,~ •••. 

(801 ) 7984533 (8Cl ) 266-77 1 1 

Pitoi Tube CaGbrauon Fortrc 

}P}tot Tube dentitteatfan Number so _ a 91619d 

C:alih.rated_gw V88 - ,]DS 

'A' Side CalIbration 

Run Number P std P s CP Deviatton 

. Cm H20 cm Fi20 (S) 

. 

' 1 

(inC:les j•{20} OnCi'tes EI20) 

0.35 0.5 0.8367 -0.00283 

2 

,. 

0.35 0.49 0.8452 0.00So"o 

3 0.35 0.5 0.8367 -0.00283 

 Average: 0.8395 

~ '8' Side Caiibratian 

Run Number P std P s Cp Deviation 

Grt H20 crrt H20 (S) 

_ (fnc.'ies H24) (inches H20) 

1 0,34 0,48 0.8416 -0.00476 

2 0.34 0.47 0.8s05 0.00415 

3 0.33 0.46 0.8470 0.00081 

~t Average: 0.8464 

 • . . 

A & 8 Average = 

. 

0.8429 

' 

.. . , ~ 

~ ~~ 
'A' Side Calibratton 

Run Number P std P s 

__. crrt H20 cn H20 

(Inches Ff20) (lnc.';es 1420) 

1 0.25 0.355 

2 0.25 0.36 

3 0.26 0.366 

Average: 

'8' Side Calibraticn 

Run Number P std P s 

Gn H20 cm H20 

(inches H20) (in&.es H20) 

1 0.25 0.355 

2 0.25 0.353 

3 0.36 

Average: 

r • 

., . . . . 

CP 

(S) 

0.8392 

0.8333 

0.8440 

Devfatfon 

0.00034 

-0.005s0 

0.00516 

CP 

(S) 

0.8392 

0.8392 

0.8416 

Deviatfcn 

-0.00081 

-0. COC81 

0.00163 

0.3400 

5co Soutts eirch Drive Sganisn t-vrx, utan S4bou 

(801 ) 79845a3 (801) 256-7111 

Pitct Tube CalibratIon Fcrm 

Oate* 9/619a. 

__ ft• c t=. - - - - l■ 

1^ 

A 3 8 Average n 0.8394 

~ `7/~ 
5oa South 8irc;t Drive SQanish Foric, Utah 848o'a 

(801) 798-35a3 (80 Z) 28 0-711 l 

Pitot Tube Caiibration Fomt 

Pitot TuEe dentificatiort Number 1 t• - A 

Zalibrated_B_v' JDS - RAL 

'A• Stde Calibcation 

Run Number P std p s Cp 

crn H20 c:rt Ef20 (S) 

(inc.esH20) rna.'tes H20) 

` 1 0.36 0.51 0.8402 

2 0.38 0.54 0.8388 

3 0.37 0.52 0.8435 

 Average: 0.8409 

'8' S+de Calibration 

Run Number P std P s Cp 

= H20 c:rt H20 (S) 

(nches H20) (Irt&,es Fi20) 

1 0.4 OS 0.8377 

2 0.38 0.54 0.8389 

3 0.4 0.505 0.8414 

Average: 0.8393 

~ A& B Average s 0.8401 

• •-~: 

pate, 9/6/9a 

Deviatfon 

-0.c0a6s 

-0.00198 

0.00267 

DeviaBon ~ 

-0.00162 

-0.CC046 

0. CC208 

~,qq 
568 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-M3 (801 ) 266-71 1 1 

Stack Temperature Sensor Calibration Form 

Thermocouole Num6er. st1 Dieital -tt 2 Omeca Date: 916194 

Caiibrated Bv: JDS - RPH 

Barornetric Pressure: 

Reference: ERTCO 

25.73 

- Mg - Giass 

Reference Point Source a Reference Thermor.ouple Temperature 

Number (specifir) Thennometer Potentiometer Difference b 

Temperature °F Temperature °F % 

° a) Ice Water 43 44 -0.32 

#1 b) Hot H20 158 159 -C.23 

Digital c) Boiiing H20 211 212 -0.21 

d) Warrn Oil 230 227 0.60 

e) Hot Oil 331 330 0.17 

n Boiling Oii 355 356 -0.16 

a) Ice Water 44 45 -0.32 

#2 b) Hot H20 155 156 -o.23 

Omega c) Boiling H20 209 221 -249 

d) Warm Oil 238 238 0.00 

e) Hot Oii 331 333 -0.33 

f) Boiling Oii 378 379 -0.15 

a Type of calibration system used. 

b(reference temp. °C + 273) -(test thermometer temp. °C + 273) ' 100< 1.5% 

reference temperature °C + 273. 
/....r..—aill =JlrA.v...IdQ.iaaA JC.7a ... 7 ~ _•••r~ ..' ...v. 

565 South Birch Drive SQanish Forit, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-85a3 (801) 266-7111 

Baiartee Cailbratlon Data Forra 

9alance Name: nhaus GA - 200 S2 fAnalvticall Number - 1292 

' -.. - -.. = u= ~~ = -- • ~ • ~ .. .-.- ► u .~_ ~ .::: 

Classification of Standard •. ~ •W.S.S. . t - 1D 

A 200 S Chaus GA - 200 S2 

' Date 0,5009 1.0000 q 10.0000 g 50.0000 a 100.0000 q 

3/2/94 0.500 1.0001 10.0001 50.0002 100.0002 

9/6/94 0.500 1.0000 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 

U 3600 Metder - BB - 3000 

Date 0.500 g 1.D000 g 10.0000 g 50.0000 g 100.0000 Q 

3/2194 0.5 1.0 10.0 50.1 100.1 

916194 0.5010 1.0001 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000 

O.nq 
c:IvlrvnmenLaJ l esijny %.•jlilpany, u:c. 

665 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801 ) 266-7111 

Sample Box Temperature Sensar Calibration Form 

gamole Box Number. CR#1 A- UT #t A- RAC 91 A-RAC it2A Date* 9/6194 

Barometric Pressurre, 25.71 

r,aiibrated By- RPH - R9B Reference: ERTCO - 105 - SNRS 

Reference Point Source a Reference Thermocoupie Temperature 

Number (specify) Themiometer Poterttiometer Difference b = Temperature °F Temperature °F 9'e 

3 Oven On 255 257 -0.38 

CR 4 Oven On 263 261 0.37 

#1 A 2 Oven On 150 150 0.00 

1 Cald H20 47 46 0.31 

8 Oven On 70 71 -0.29 

7 Oven On 73 73 0.00 

3 Oven On 247 249 -0.38 

UTA 4 Overt On 252 253 -0.19 

#1 A 2 Oven On 148 149 -0.24 

1 Cofd H20 46 47 -0.31 

8 Oven On 80 81 -0.28 

7 Oven Ort 79 79 0.00 

3 Oven On 266 264 0.37 

RAC 4 Oven On 247 247 0.00 

#1 A 2 Oven On 145 146 -0.24 

1 Coid H20 49 50 -0.31 

8 Oven On 83 83 O.CO 

7 Oven On 81 82 -0.28 

3 Oven On 236 238 -0.39 

RAC 4 Oven On 248 250 -0.38 

ft2A 2 Oven On 162 160 0.46 

_ 1 Ccld H20 45 46 -0.31 

8 Oven On 80 82 -0.57 

7 Oven On 81 80 0.28 

a Type of calibration system used. 

b(reference temp. °C + 273) -(test thermometer temp. °C + 273) • 100< 1.5°/, 

reference temperature °C + 273 
-........_ ~ .. .-..... ~ .....a ~ aa ......... ~ - - -r_.. ~ ..._. 

565 Scuth Birch Drive Spanish Forlc, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111 

Balanca Calibrration Data Form 

8alance Name- Satorius - A 200 S fAnalvticall Number * 35120053 

. . ~ • r .. . - . ~ . - f[* 

Slaeeification_ of Standard Weiqrts. Jvoe 'S' W.B.S. Anafvst BAL - DFH 

A 2C0 S 

- Date 0.500 g 1.0000 g _ 10.0000 GL 50.0000 g 100.0000 g 

3/2J94 0.500 0.9999 10.0001 50.0001 100.0001 

9/6/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.0000 

U 3600 

Date 0.500 a 1.0000 a 10,0000 g 50.0000 g 1 00.0000 g, 

3J2/94 0.5000 1.0000 10.0000 50.0001 100.1000 

9/6194 0.501 1.0010 10.0000 50.0001 100.0001 

0 

n St"1 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Forit, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-8553 (801) 266-7111 

POSTTEST DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

(English Units) 

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number Ptant 

1219/94 25.51 CR(097) ISB 

West Jordan, Utah 

Calibrated Bv Pretest Yi Averaqe Yi Low SQan High Soan 

VBB - DFH 1.085 1.075 1.031 1.139 

Orfice Manometer Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter aH/13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting ol-I (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

2.00 10.839 10.005 67 0.14706 67 

67 

2.00 10.841 10.07 68 0.14706 68 

68 

2.00 10.85 10.012 69 0.14706 69 

69 

Dry Gas Meter 

Inlet Outlet Average Time ID 

(Td. i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Y 

67 68 67.50 11.518 1.078 

67 68 

67 69 68.25 11.509 1.071 

68 69 • 

68 69 68.50 11.511 1.076 

68 69 

Average Y 

1.075 

- :.Post Test Temperaturs Check 

Date: 12/9/94 Reference: ERTCO Hg Thermometer 

Meter Bo. CR #1(097) Sample Box: CR #1 A 

Meter Box Reference 

Meter In: 69 69 

Meter Out: 69 81 

Samole Box Reference 

impinger In: 204 200 

Impinger Out: 48 49 

Oven: 245 246 
American Environmental Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 

(801) 7984553 (801) 266-7111 

POSTTEST DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

(Engiish Units) 

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number Plant 

12l9194 25.51 RAC #145-569 IS8 

West Jordan, Utah 

Calibrated Bv Pretest Yi Averaqe Yi Low Soan High Soan 

VBB - DFH 0.998 1.011 0.945 ' 1.048 

Orfice Manometer Wet Test Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter AW13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setdng al-1 (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Average Temp. 

2.00 10.06 9.963 67 0.14706 67 

67 

200 10.12 10.017 68 0.14706 68 

68 

2.00 10.11 9.986 69 0.14706 69 

69 

Dry Gas Meter 

Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 

(Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Y 

67 68 68.25 11.511 1.006 

69 69 

71 70 71.25 11.506 1.011 

73 • 71 

75 72 74.25 11.522 1.017 

77 73 

Average Y 

1.011 

Post Test Temperature Check 

Date: 1219/54 Reference: EATCO Hg Thermometer 

Meter Box: RAC #145-569 Sample Box: RAC #1 A 

Meter In: 

Meter Box Reference Samole Box 

Impinger In: 201 

Reference 

77 79 191 

Meter Out: 72 74 Impinger Out: 47 47 

Oven: 237 241 

ao 
American Environmentai Testing Company, Inc. 

565 South Birch Drive Spanish Foric, Utah 84660 

(801) 798-85S3 (801) 266-7111 

POSTTEST DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

(Engiish Units) 

Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number Plant 

1219/94 25.51 RAC #2824 ISB 

West Jordan, Utah 

Calibrated Bv Pretest Yi Averaqe Yi Low SBan High Soan 

VBB - DFH 0.998 1.010 0.948 1.048 

Orfice Manometer Wet Test Meter Dry Gas Meter Wet Test Meter eW13.6 Wet Test Meter 

Setting ol-I (Vw) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Tw) °F Aver3ge Temp. 

2.00 10.08 9.98 67 0.14706 67 

67 

2.00 10.01 10.011 68 0.14706 68 

68 

2.00 10.1 9.973 69 0.14706 69 

69 

Dry Gas Meter 

Inlet Outlet Average Time 0 

(Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Y 

68 68 69.00 10.052 1.008 

71 69 

74 70 72.75 10.069 1.003 

76 71 

79 72 76.00 10.077 1.020 

81 72 

Average Yi 

1.010 

- Post Test Temperature Checlt 

Date: 12/9/94 Reference: ERTCO Hg Thermometer 

Meter Box: RAC #2824 Sampie Box: RAC #2A 

Meter In: 

Meter Box Reference Samole Box 

Impinger In: 205 

Reference 

78 80 197 

Meter Out: 73 73 Impinger Out: 49 49 

Oven: 240 245 

~~ 
.0 

~ ~ _ '~=:2F ~

` .. J..~1:+cVi=.~ ~.~?l::c•7:.:G~..:G~i-.t°a:•,c~.::c~.vi...C~.c:ti•-ci.•-_.:~._;.•.c.~.a-a..c:..~•a..z' ..,.~ 

SPECIALTY GAS DIVISION l 

11711 S. Alameda Stroet ~ Los Angeles. C.a 90059 

(213) 564-5711 i 

-- - `-ANALYTICAL REPORT - PRO ~ UCT CERTIF ~ CATiON ~ 

 . . . . . '• . .. 

. 

. 

f T~~ „Mouatain Airgas -.• DATE. 31 Jan 1994 +6 

~ . . ~w~" ,2.y:. . .:' 

~y. • . ~ . ; • • • •. + .• , . . • ~ 

i- _ ~ ~~ -:... .~::.r:~ .~::: ...~•- ..~~ . -" .- P .O: • NO: _ 00542 2. 

_ -- 

-„--~ 

, • . . .. • • . . _.a• . ~ . 

 ' . . . . . . ~ • • . • . 

'EPA Protocol Procedure G-1: • ~- 

CYLiNOEFt NO: CONST(TUEivTS CONCSIVTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL ~ 

';.:' :• ~ t . : . . 

CC10#484 ~ Sulfur 'Dioside 500 P?M 514.6 PPM 

' . ~ .'' • • Nitrogen Balance Balance 

.,. . =. • • . . 

. r .. . . 

.. • .; . • 

. . . • , ~- ~ 

'.. • ~ •~' ~ . .. :' , j 

CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 36 

EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1997 

Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig 

=Da•not use --below•'150 psig '" ` ' • 

.0% 

William L. •Vernon ANALYST 

,• .i'~'~:. ~ ~ 

~• 7!y' • ` . 

~~N ~ -••- t ~ 

Z •)/q.1 

m 

,. b 
ION 

Amqi!eS.:ZA 90059 

ANALYTICAL RgPORT - PRODUCT CER-TIFICATiON 

TO: Mountain Airgas .. W, 3 1 "'Jaz 1991 4 

EPA Proto ~:ol Procedure • G- 1 

CYLINDER NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATiON: NOMINAL ACTUAL 

, CC10514 sulfur Di;xide. aso PPM 901.6 PPM 

Nitrogen Balance jB'alance 

CERTIFICAtION PEZOD'(months): 36 

EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1997 

Cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig 

Do not use-below 130 pA i 

T 

r 

n 

_2 

:74 

r jr 

AD 

ANALYSr 

Oiiiiam L. tainci t. 
~~-'c~~ SPECIALTY GAS DIVISION 

11 711 S. Alameda Street 

Los AngelOS. CA 90059 

(21:3) 564•2-711 

ANALYTICALREPORT PROOUCT CERTIFICATION 

TO: Mountain Airgas DATE: 31 J"an 199 4 

EPA Pr6tocol Procedure 0-1 

CYLINCER NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATICN: NCMINAL ACTUAL 

••,.CC3775 Sulfur Dioxide 150 PPM 163. 5 PPX 

Nitrogen.' Balance a* nce 

CERTIFZCZLTION PE".1101D (Mcaths):- 24 

EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1996 

•cylinder Pressure: 2000 psig 

Do ndt use below 150 ps g 

Xt. 

4/ William L. Vernon 

ANALYST 
. . ~ . . ~ . _ .. : ~.: . • . 

~ ..' . . •• •• • ' • ~ 

• , . • .. 

~ ~- 

• 

- ' .-..:.; 

. ~ ' .. . .. : ~.::; • ~ : r ~ _ ~:.:. ~- 

. ' .... . ....- . 

. . . • . . . . •~ .. ....-. ~C... :•_LY... ...r .. . 1i ... . i . .. 

. • . 

. . . _ ~ -rn: ~~. . , 

• . .. •. . .. . . . , 

. . . , ~ .. .. ~ ......._........ ««. a.•'... . ' 

. • .. . .. . . ~ . • . . ~ ' . _.. ~ - . .i. .....~ ~i ._ . 

~ • ' . . . . . .. ~ • .. . .. .. ~ . . . • • •~' ~ 

, . : ^ • ~ . •1i ~:y.~ . ' e . -`Mla ~ ;4~= : .. ~ : • 

. 

- (. • .. . ... . . ~ . ..v ~ ... _^a• ~Il`~w:~-~ 

. , • • 

William L. Vernon -- 

~ 

.~_ 

~ 

= 

•~~v, 

I~ ~y 

i~ 

~ 

~rr1 

~yl 

;..~~-.•: 

@00 =@Zz SPBOIALTY GAS DIY1SiON ► I , 

t 1 T1 Alameda Street 

Los 

V.S.

geies, CA 90059 n

1213) 564-5711 

~ 

ANALYTiCAL REPORT - PROOUCT CERTIFICATION 

TO: - Mountaia Airqas DATE: 3 Jan 1994 

•~,.r.~ ~ ~..-• a ..!-.,r- - — , - • "~"'~ .-0 : -N0 i '00 ~- .-- . _ .. ..._ . 

. . 

EPA Protocol Procedure 0-1. - 1 

CYLINDEA NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCcNTRATiON: NOMINAL ACTUAL 

150-810 Sulfur Dioxi de 250 PPM 260.7 PPM 

Nitrogen B-alance Balance 

CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 24 

-EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1996 

Cylinder Pressure: - 2000 psig - •-_ .__ ~. . _... -; —~------- - 

Do not us e below 150 psig 

~ 

~~. 

-L.:*; 

W •u93 

I ~ 

i ~ 
~oG~

a. • ~ ~ (/~, 

SPECIALTY- GAS DIVISION 

11711 

. 

S. Alameda istmet 

L03 Angeles. CA 90059 

564-ST11 

ANALYTlCAL REPORT PRODUCT CEFITIFICATION 

TO: Mountain Airgas DATE: 31 Jan 1994 

EPA Protocol Procedure G- 1 

CYLINDER NO. CONSTITUENTS CONCENTRATION: NOMINAL ACTUAL 

Nitric Oxide 250 ppm 251.1 PPM 

NOX 259.6 PPM 

Nitrogen Balance Balance 

CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months): 24 

EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1996 

--

Cylinder Pressure: 2000 paig 

Do not below 150.-psi4 

-107 J 

williaM L. vernon 

7 
2 

rt"ja,"j I C,;; I 

dt 

GAS OfISICN V 

Aiamoda Street 

Ang Gies. CA 90059 

1 . _. p (213~ 56A.5711 e. 

]CAL- R., P ',-'o U 'ou IFICATION 

TO: tAn- Airga DATE::.:-' - - 3iA Jan .1-994 

.~ 

. • ~ . . 

a. ' 

.. - ~~. .. _ ~ 

. . . • ~ `; • " . ~ ., - . . . • . . . . . . • .-••c

~

~-

l~ 

EPA Protoc*l Procedure. G-1 

CYLINDER NC. CONSTITUENTS CCNCENTRATICN• NOMINAL ACTUAL 

CC10512 Nitric Oxide 150 PPM 159.•: PPM 

NOX 159.9 PPM 

Nitrolgen Balance Bal ance 

. •-..CERTIFICATION PERIOD (months) 24 

EXPIRATION DATE: January 31, 1996 

Cylinder Pressure: - 2000 psig 

Do not use below 150, psig 

.4 

Z! 

i~jl / // / / . 

. . . • 

llilliam L. 

w ANALYST 

ernon 

W

. 

m 

.0 

f