alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE *v.*JAMES A. STONE.

*Maintaining a Nuisance contrary to R. L. s. 3836*— Liquor *Law. Demurrer.*

A complaint, under theR. L , s. 3836, alleging that the respondent kept and maintained a har-room, in which intoxicating liquors were unlawfully sold, without any averment, that it was “ used as a place of resort,” is insufficient; hut it is amendable, although no motion was made to amend until the case reached the Supreme Court.

This was a prosecution for keeping and maintaining a nuisance, brought before the City Court of the city of Burlington, December 19, 1881. Heard on demurrer to the complaint. Demurrer overruled.

*M. A.*Bingham, for the State.

*551
      *F. R. Hard*and *H. F.*Brownell, for the respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Taft, J.

This was a prosecution for keeping and maintaining a nuisance under sec. 3836, R. L. The complaint is in the form given by statute, except that it is not alleged that the place designated was. “ used as a place of resort.” The case is before us upon demurrer to the complaint. The want of such allegation renders the complaint insufficient in matter of substance. It is proper for any court, where a complaint for such an offense is pending, to permit an amendment of the same at any stage of the proceedings. R. L., sec. 3865. The respondent did not indicate, in the court below, the defect complained of; if he had, no doubt it would have been promptly remedied. He having an opportunity to do so, and, evidently, knowingly omitting it, a majority of the court think the case should be made an exception to the rule laid down in *State*v. Kennedy, 36 Vt. 563, where the court refused, in its discretion, to allow an amendment not moved for in the County Court. The complaint may be amended, the exceptions are overruled, judgment reversed *pro*forma, and the case remanded to the City Court for trial.
Exhibit 31.2 

 

Certifications****

 

I, Curtis J. Parker, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cotelligent, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of Cotelligent, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures presented in the annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether of not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 8, 2004
#### § 0.1 The Commission.

The Federal Communications Commission is composed of five (5) members who are appointed by the president subject to confirmation by the Senate. Normally, one Commissioner is appointed or reappointed each year, for a term of five (5) years.

[53 FR 29054, Aug. 2, 1988]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                     FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                                VW CREDIT, INC.
                     -------------------------------------

                     VOLKSWAGEN CREDIT, AUTO MASTER TRUST

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of VW Credit, Inc. 
("VWCI"), as Servicer, pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as 
of February 29, 1996 (as amended and supplemented, the "Agreement"), by and 
among Volkswagen Auto Receivables Corporation, as seller, VWCI, as Servicer, and
Citibank, N.A., as Trustee, do hereby certify that:

         1.   VWCI is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.

         2.   The Undersigned is a Servicing Officer and is  duly authorized 
pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the 
Trustee, any Agent and any Enhancement Providers.

         3.   A Review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from 
the initial Closing Date through the calender year ended December 31, 1998 and 
of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

         4.   Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my 
knowledge, performed in all material respects all of its obligations under the 
Agreement throughout such period and no default in the performance of such 
obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 
below.

         5.   None.

         Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used as defined in 
the Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate 
this Nineteenth day of March, 1999.


                                                       _________________________
                                                 Name: Dennis Tack

                                                 Title:Controller
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.2102 Eligibility of applications for competitive bidding. ( a ) Mutually exclusive initial applications are subject to competitive bidding.
( b ) The following types of license applications are not subject to competitive bidding procedures: ( 1 ) Public safety radio services, including private internal radio services used by state and local governments and non-government entities and including emergency road services provided by not-for-profit organizations, that ( i ) Are used to protect the safety of life, health, or property; and
( ii ) Are not commercially available to the public;
( 2 ) Initial licenses or construction permits for digital television service given to existing terrestrial broadcast licensees to replace their analog television service licenses; or
( 3 ) Noncommercial educational and public broadcast stations described under 47 U.S.C. 397(6).
( c ) [Reserved]
Note to § 1.2102 :
To determine the rules that apply to competitive bidding, specific service rules should also be consulted.
[59 FR 44293, Aug. 26, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 40718, Aug. 9, 1995; 62 FR 23163, Apr. 29, 1997; 63 FR 10780, Mar. 5, 1998; 79 FR 48528, Aug. 15, 2014]
No. 10-11219.

#### Snapp *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4219 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4219

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical revisions to 
         maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 1994

  Mrs. Fowler (for herself, Mr. Hutto, Mr. Peterson of Florida, Mrs. 
   Thurman, Mr. Mica, Mr. Young of Florida, Mr. Goss, Mr. Bacchus of 
 Florida, Mr. Lewis of Florida, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Stearns, Mr. 
McCollum, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Canady, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mrs. Meek, 
   Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Johnston of Florida, Mr. Deutsch, Mr. Diaz-
  Balart, Mr. Shaw, and Mr. Hastings) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical revisions to 
         maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL REVISIONS TO MAPS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall, before the 
end of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, make such technical revisions to the maps described in subsection 
(b) as are necessary to ensure that depictions of areas on those maps 
are consistent with the depictions of areas appearing on the maps 
entitled ______________, dated ______________, and on file with the 
Secretary.
    (b) Maps Described.--The maps described in this subsection are maps 
that--
            (1) are included in a set of maps entitled ``Coastal 
        Barrier Resources System'', dated October 24, 1990; and
            (2) relate to the following units of the Coastal Barrier 
        Resources System: P04A, P05, P05A, P08, P10, P11A, P17, P17A, 
        P18, P18P, P19, P19P, P24, P25, FL-05P, FL-15, FL-90, and FL-
        95P.

                                 <all>
```
#### Russell D. BALKO, Defendant Below-Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below-Appellee.

No. 346, 2016

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: August 15, 2016

Decided: September 8, 2016

Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware, Cr. ID 1405012254

REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Celulosa Arauco y Constitución S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2013



/s/ Matías DomeykoName:  Matías DomeykoTitle:    Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 30, 2013



/s/ Robinson TajmuchName:  Robinson TajmuchTitle:    Senior Vice-President Comptroller
No. 11-155.

#### Alvarez *v.*Wong, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 99.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Angelica Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 26, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Don W. Hubble, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

                                      /s/ Don W. Hubble
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Don W. Hubble
                                      Chairman, President and Chief Executive
                                      Officer of Angelica Corporation

                                      December 6, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 127 (Friday, June 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 13, 2000.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Madison Hotel, 15th and M Streets, NW., Washington, 
DC 20005.
    Contact Person: Alan L. Willard, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 23, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-16622 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.2

           FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF STEVEN J. BLAD
           ---------------------------------------------------------


         This FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF STEVEN J. BLAD (this
"First Amendment") is entered into this 20th day of November, 2001, (the
"Effective Date"), by and between VendingData Corporation, a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") and Steven J. Blad (the "Employee").

         Whereas, the parties have entered into an Employment Agreement of
Steven J. Blad dated August 10, 1999 (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement expires on December 31, 2002; and

         WHEREAS, the parties desire that Employee remain as the Company's
President and Chief Exeutive Officer for a period beyond the current term of the
Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

         1. The term of the Agreement shall be extended through and including
December 31, 2004 (the "Extended Term").

         2. In consideration of Employee's agreement to remain in the employ of
the Company as its President and Chief Executive Officer through the Extended
Term, the Company hereby grants to Employee stock options to purchase two
million (2,000,000) shares ("Shares") of the Company's common stock at
thirty-five cents ($.35) per share. The stock options are granted pursuant to
the following terms and conditions.

                  (a) Upon the Effective Date of this First Amendment, the
         Employee shall have a vested right to acquire up to six hundred seventy
         thousand (670,000) Shares at thirty-five cents ($.35) per Share.

                  (b) Upon the one year anniversary of the Effective Date of
         this First Amendment, the Employee shall have a vested right to acquire
         up to six hundred sixty-five thousand (650,000) Shares at thirty-five
         cents ($.35) per Share.

                  (c) Upon the second anniversary of the Effective Date of this
         First Amendment, the Employee shall have the vested right to acquire up
         to six hundred sixty-five thousand (665,000) Shares at thirty-five
         cents ($.35) per Share.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment as
of the date and year first above written.


VendingData Corporation


By: /s/ James E. Crabbe
   ----------------------------------
   James E. Crabbe
   Chairman of the Board of Directors



/s/ Steven J. Blad
-------------------------------------
Steven J. Blad
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Rural Utilities Service 

# AGENCY:

Rural Utilities Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of finding of no significant impact. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) has made a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) with respect to the construction of a 115/24.9 kV distribution substation by Berkeley Electric Cooperative. Berkeley Electric Cooperative may request financing assistance from the RUS to finance the construction of the substation. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bob Quigel, Engineering and Environmental Staff, RUS, Stop 1571, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-1571, telephone (202) 720-0468, e-mail at bquigel@rus.usda.gov. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The proposed substation will be located on a 18.4-acre site in Dorchester County, South Carolina, between Parkers Ferry Road and Ridge Road approximately 1000 feet east of the intersection of these two roads. The substation will cover approximately 7.5 acres of the site. The substation will be surrounded by a seven foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire. A crushed stone driveway approximately 22 feet in width will be constructed from Ridge Road to the substation for access. The substation will be connected to an existing 115 kV transmission line which parallels Parkers Ferry Road. Approximately 500 feet of transmission line will be constructed to connect the substation to the transmission line. 

Copies of the FONSI are available from RUS at the address provided herein or from Tom Meyers, Vice President of Engineering, Berkeley Electric Cooperative, 414 North Highway 52, Monks Corner, South Carolina 29461, telephone (843) 761-8200. 

Dated: June 27, 2000. 

Blaine D. Stockton, Jr., 

Assistant Administrator, Electric Program. 

[FR Doc. 00-16655 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-15-P
#### *The Commonwealth v. Scott.

June, 1842.

Counterfeiting*-—Indictment—Sufficiency of.—An indictment on the statute of 1834-5, ch. 66, charging that the prisoner did knowingly have in his custody, without lawful authority or excuse, "one die or instrument” for the purpose of producing and impressing the stamp and similitude of the current silver coin called a half dollar, (no further describing the die or instrument) is insufficient.

In the circuit superior court of Ohio county, at October term 1841, an indictment was found against Thomas Scott, charging that he, on &c. at &c. “one die or instrument for the purpose of making, producing and impressing the figure, stamp, resemblance and similitude of the lawful silver coin current within this commonwealth, called a half dollar, did falsely, feloniously, without lawful authority and without lawful excuse, knowingly have in his custody and possession, against the form of the act of the general assembly,” &c. The indictment was founded upon the statute of March 10, 1835, Acts of 1834-5, ch. 66, p. 47.* After a verdict *finding the prisoner guilty, and ascertaining *431the term of his imprisonment in the penitentiary to be five years, he moved the court to arrest the judgment, because of the insufficiency of the indictment; and the court, with his assent, adjourned to this court the question, Ought the judgment to be arrested for insufliciencj7 of the indictment?

*

See monographic *note*on “Forgery and Counterfeiting” appended to Coleman v. Com., 25 Gratt 865, and monographic *note*on “Indictments, Informations anc Presentments” appended to Boyle v. Com., 14 Gratt. 674.

*

“If any person or persons, without lawful authority, such as is hereinafter mentioned, shall engrave, cut, etch, scrape, or by any other art, means or device make, or shall cause or procure to be engraved &c. or shall knowingly aid or assist in the engraving &c. in or upon any plate of copper, brass, steel, iron, pewter, or upon any other metal or mixture of metal, or upon wood or other material, or any plate whatsoever, for the purpose of producing a print or impression of all or any part or parts of any bank note &c. or of any coin current within this commonwealth, whether made current by law or usage, or shall use any such plate so en - graved &p. or shall use any other instrument or con*431trivance, for the making or printing any such note &c. or any such current coin, or if any person or persons shall, without law ful authority as aforesaid and without lawful excuse, knowingly have in his, her or their custody any such plate or instrument, every person so offending in any of the cases aforesaid, and being thereof convicted according to law, shall be adjudged a felon, and, if a free person, shali be punished by confinement in the public j ail and penitentiary for not less than five nor more than twenty years.”—Note in Original Edition.

PER CTJRIAM.

The judgment ought to be arrested for the insufficiency of the indictment.