50336 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

((CF3)2CFCF2OCH3); 1-ethoxy1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-nonafluorobutane 

(C4F9OC2H5 or HFE-7200); 2- 

(ethoxydifluoromethyl)-1,1,1,2,3,3,3- 

heptafluoropropane 

((CF3)2CFCF2OC2H5); methyl acetate; 

1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-methoxypropane (n-C3F7OCH3, HFE-7000); 3- 

ethoxy-1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6- 

dodecafluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl) hexane 

(HFE-7500); 1,1,1,2,3,3,3- 

heptafluoropropane (HFC 227ea); 

methyl formate (HCOOCH3); 

1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5-decafluoro-3- 

methoxy-4-trifluoromethyl-pentane 

(HFE-7300); propylene carbonate; 

dimethyl carbonate; trans-1,3,3,3- 

tetrafluoropropene; HCF2OCF2H (HFE134); HCF2OCF2OCF2H (HFE-236cal2); 

HCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (HFE-338pcc13); 

HCF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (H-Galden 

1040x or H-Galden ZT 130 (or 150 or 

180)); trans 1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop1-ene; 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene; 2- 

amino-2-methyl-1-propanol; t-butyl 

acetate; 1,1,2,2- Tetrafluoro -1-(2,2,2- 

trifluoroethoxy) ethane; and 

perfluorocarbon compounds which fall 

into these classes: 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2016–17789 Filed 7–29–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0304; FRL–9949–72– 

Region 3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Maryland; Control of Volatile Organic 

Compounds Emissions From 

Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing 

Materials 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve a state 

implementation plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the State of Maryland. 

This revision pertains to Maryland’s 

adoption of the requirements in EPA’s 

control technique guidelines (CTG) for 

fiberglass boat manufacturing materials. 

This action is being taken under the 

Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This rule is effective on 

September 30, 2016 without further 

notice, unless EPA receives adverse 

written comment by August 31, 2016. If 

EPA receives such comments, it will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule in the Federal Register 

and inform the public that the rule will 

not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03– 

OAR–2016–0304 at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or via email to 

fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. For 

comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 

follow the online instructions for 

submitting comments. Once submitted, 

comments cannot be edited or removed 

from Regulations.gov. For either manner 

of submission, the EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

confidential business information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. EPA will generally not consider 

comments or comment contents located 

outside of the primary submission (i.e. 

on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 

system). For additional submission 

methods, please contact the person 

identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the 

full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gavin Huang, (215) 814–2042, or by 

email at huang.gavin@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides 

that SIPs for nonattainment areas must 

include reasonably available control 

measures (RACM), including reasonably 

available control technology (RACT), for 

sources of emissions. Additionally, 

Maryland is in the Ozone Transport 

Region (OTR) established under section 

184(a) of the CAA. Pursuant to section 

184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA, all areas in the 

OTR must submit SIP revisions that 

include implementation of RACT with 

respect to all sources of VOCs in the 

states covered by a CTG. See CAA 

section 184(b)(1). EPA defines RACT as 

‘‘the lowest emission limitation that a 

particular source is capable of meeting 

by the application of control technology 

that is reasonably available considering 

technological and economic feasibility.’’ 

44 FR 53761 (September 17, 1979). 

CTGs are intended to provide state 

and local air pollution control 

authorities information that should 

assist them in determining RACT for 

VOCs from various sources of fiberglass 

boat manufacturing. EPA has not 

published a previous CTG for fiberglass 

boat manufacturing materials, but did 

publish an assessment of VOC 

emissions from fiberglass boat 

manufacturing in 1990. The 1990 

assessment defined the nature and 

scope of VOC emissions from fiberglass 

boat manufacturing, characterized the 

industry, estimated per plant and 

national VOC emissions, and identified 

and evaluated potential control options. 

In 2001, EPA promulgated the National 

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants for Boat Manufacturing, 40 

CFR part 63, subpart VVVV (2001 

NESHAP). The 2001 NESHAP 

established organic hazardous air 

pollutant (HAP) emissions limits based 

on low-HAP resins and gel coats and 

low-emitting resin application 

technology. Several of the air pollution 

control districts in California have 

specific regulations that control VOC 

emissions from fiberglass boat 

manufacturing operations as part of 

their regulations for limiting VOC 

emissions from polyester resin 

operations. Several other states also 

have regulations that address VOC 

emissions from fiberglass boat 

manufacturing as part of polyester resin 

operations. After reviewing the 1990 

VOC assessment, the 2001 NESHAP, 

and existing California district and other 

state VOC emission reduction 

approaches, and after considering 

information obtained since the issuance 

of the 2001 NESHAP, EPA developed a 

CTG entitled Control Techniques 

Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat 

Manufacturing Materials (Publication 

No. EPA 453/R–08–004; September 

2008). 

The CTG for fiberglass boat 

manufacturing materials provides 

control recommendations for reducing 

VOC emissions from the use of gel coats, 

resins, and materials used to clean 

application equipment in fiberglass boat 

manufacturing operations. This CTG 

applies to facilities that manufacture 

hulls or decks of boats from fiberglass or 

build molds to make fiberglass boat 

hulls or decks. EPA’s 2008 CTG 

recommends that the following 

operations should be covered: Open 

molding resin and gel coat operations 

(these include pigmented gel coat, clear 

gel coat, production resin, tooling gel 

coat, and tooling resin); resin and gel 

coat mixing operations; and resin and 

gel coat application equipment cleaning 

operations. 

EPA’s 2008 CTG recommends the 

following VOC reduction measures: 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 50337 

VOC emission limits for molding resins 

and gel coats; work practices for resin 

and gel coat mixing containers; and 

VOC content and vapor pressure limits 

for cleaning materials. Recommended 

VOC emission limits for open molding 

resin and gel coat operations are shown 

in Table 1. 

TABLE 1—MONOMER VOC CONTENT LIMITATIONS FOR OPEN MOLDING RESIN AND GEL COAT OPERATIONS

Materials Application method 

Individual monomer VOC 

content or weight average 

monomer VOC 

content limit 

(weight percent) 

Production Resin ............................................................... Atomized (spray) .............................................................. 28 

Production Resin ............................................................... Nonatomized .................................................................... 35 

Pigmented Gel Coat ......................................................... Any Method ...................................................................... 33 

Clear Gel Coat .................................................................. Any Method ...................................................................... 48 

Tooling Resin .................................................................... Atomized .......................................................................... 30 

Tooling Resin .................................................................... Nonatomized .................................................................... 39 

Tooling Gel Coat ............................................................... Any Method ...................................................................... 40 

II. Summary of SIP Revision 

On December 23, 2015, the Maryland 

Department of the Environment (MDE) 

submitted on behalf of the State of 

Maryland to EPA SIP revision #15–07 

concerning implementation of RACT 

requirements for the control of VOC 

emissions from fiberglass boat 

manufacturing materials. Maryland has 

adopted EPA’s CTG standards for 

fiberglass boat manufacturing materials, 

including the emission limits found in 

Table 1 of this rulemaking action, 

through a regulation, found at Code of 

Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 

26.11.19 (relating to VOC from specific 

processes). This SIP revision seeks to 

add COMAR 26.11.19.26–1 (control of 

VOC emissions from fiberglass boat 

manufacturing materials) to the 

Maryland SIP and also includes an 

amendment to COMAR 26.11.19.26 

(control of VOC emissions from 

reinforced plastic manufacturing) which 

was previously approved into the 

Maryland SIP. In addition to adopting 

EPA’s CTG standards, COMAR 

26.11.19.26–1 includes numerous terms 

and definitions to support the 

interpretation of the measures, as well 

as work practices for cleaning, 

compliance and monitoring 

requirements, sampling and testing, and 

record keeping requirements. The 

amendment to COMAR 26.11.19.26 at 

COMAR 26.11.19.26A exempts 

fiberglass boat manufacturing to avoid 

duplicative or conflicting requirements. 

Prior to Maryland’s new COMAR 

26.11.19.26–1, fiberglass boat 

manufacturing materials were covered 

under COMAR 26.11.19.26 which did 

not address fully EPA’s CTG 

requirements. Thus, with COMAR 

26.11.19.26–1 now addressing fiberglass 

boat manufacturing materials, Maryland 

has revised COMAR 26.11.19.26A to 

clarify and exempt fiberglass boat 

manufacturing materials from COMAR 

26.11.19.26A as these are now clearly 

addressed in COMAR 26.11.19.26–1. 

EPA finds the provisions in COMAR 

26.11.19.26–1 identical to the CTG 

standards for fiberglass boat 

manufacturing materials and therefore 

approvable in accordance with sections 

172(c)(1) and 184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA. 

III. Final Action 

EPA is approving the Maryland SIP 

revision adding new regulation COMAR 

26.11.19.26–1 and amending COMAR 

26.11.19.26, which was submitted on 

December 23, 2015, because it meets the 

requirement to adopt RACT for sources 

covered by EPA’s CTG standards for 

fiberglass boat manufacturing materials. 

EPA is publishing this rule without 

prior proposal because EPA views this 

as a noncontroversial amendment and 

anticipates no adverse comment. 

However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ 

section of this Federal Register, EPA is 

publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

SIP revision if adverse comments are 

filed. This rule will be effective on 

September 30, 2016 without further 

notice unless EPA receives adverse 

comment by August 31, 2016. If EPA 

receives adverse comment, EPA will 

publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that the rule will not take effect. EPA 

will address all public comments in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period on this action. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

must do so at this time. Please note that 

if EPA receives adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rulemaking action, the EPA is 

finalizing regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation 

by reference of COMAR 26.11.19.26–1 

and an amendment to COMAR 

26.11.19.26 into the Maryland SIP. EPA 

has made, and will continue to make, 

these documents generally available 

electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or may be 

viewed at the appropriate EPA office 

(see the ADDRESSES section of this 

preamble for more information). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. General Requirements 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
50338 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

B. Submission to Congress and the 

Comptroller General 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by September 30, 2016. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ 

section of this Federal Register, rather 

than file an immediate petition for 

judicial review of this direct final rule, 

so that EPA can withdraw this direct 

final rule and address the comment in 

the proposed rulemaking action. 

This action to approve the Maryland 

SIP revision adding new regulation 

COMAR 26.11.19.26–1 and amending 

COMAR 26.11.19.26 may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, Ozone, 

Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: July 15, 2016. 

Shawn M. Garvin, 

Regional Administrator, Region III. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart V—Maryland 

■ 2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entry for 

‘‘26.11.19.26’’ and adding in numerical 

order the entry for ‘‘26.11.19.26–1’’ to 

read as follows: 

§ 52.1070 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS, TECHNICAL MEMORANDA, AND STATUTES IN THE MARYLAND SIP 

Code of Maryland 

Administrative 

Regulations 

(COMAR) citation 

Title/subject 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date 

Additional 

explanation/ 

citation at 40 CFR 

52.1100 

*******

26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds From Specific Processes 

*******

26.11.19.26 ..................... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions 

from Reinforced Plastic Manufacturing.

09/28/15 8/1/16 [Insert Federal 

Register citation].

Amendment to .26A. 

26.11.19.26–1 ................. Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions 

from Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing.

09/28/15 8/1/16 [Insert Federal 

Register citation].

New Regulation. 

*******


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 50339 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2016–17809 Filed 7–29–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0280; FRL–9947–70– 

Region 9] 

Revisions to California State 

Implementation Plan; Bay Area Air 

Quality Management District; 

Stationary Source Permits 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is finalizing a limited 

approval and limited disapproval of 

revisions to Regulation 2, Rules 1 and 2 

for the Bay Area Air Quality 

Management District (BAAQMD or 

District) portion of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on 

April 22, 2013. These revisions consist 

of significant updates to rules governing 

the issuance of permits for stationary 

sources, including review and 

permitting of major sources and major 

modifications under parts C and D of 

title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Under 

the authority of the CAA, this action 

simultaneously approves a local rule 

that regulates permit requirements for 

stationary sources and directs the 

BAAQMD to correct rule deficiencies. 

DATES: These rules will be effective on 

August 31, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established 

docket number EPA–R09–OAR–2015– 

0280 for this action. Generally, 

documents in the docket for this action 

are available electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, California 94105–3901. 

While all documents in the docket are 

listed at http://www.regulations.gov, 

some information may be publicly 

available only at the hard copy location 

(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, 

multi-volume reports), and some may 

not be available in either location (e.g., 

confidential business information 

(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shaheerah Kelly, EPA Region 9, (415) 

947–4156, kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, the terms 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Summary of Public Comments and EPA 

Responses 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Review 

Definitions 

For the purpose of this document, we 

are giving meaning to certain words or 

initials as follows: 

(i) The word or initials Act or CAA 

mean or refer to the Clean Air Act, 

unless the context indicates otherwise. 

(ii) The initials ATC mean or refer to 

the authority to construct permit. 

(iii) The word or initials BAAQMD or 

District mean or refer to the Bay Area 

Air Quality Management District. 

(iv) The initials CFR mean or refer to 

Code of Federal Regulations. 

(v) The initials or words EPA, we, us 

or our mean or refer to the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency. 

(vi) The initials ERCs mean or refer to 

Emission Reduction Credits. 

(vii) The initials FLM mean or refer to 

Federal Land Manager. 

(viii) The initials FR mean or refer to 

Federal Register. 

(ix) The initials NSR mean or refer to 

New Source Review. 

(x) The initials PM2.5 mean or refer to 

particulate matter with an aerodynamic 

diameter of less than or equal to 2.5 

micrometers (fine particulate matter). 

(xi) The initials PSD mean or refer to 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration. 

(xii) The initials PTE mean or refer to 

potential to emit. 

(xiii) The initials SIP mean or refer to 

State Implementation Plan. 

(xiv) The initials SO2 mean or refer to 

sulfur dioxide. 

(xv) The initials TSD mean or refer to 

the technical support document for the 

proposed action. 

I. Proposed Action 

On August 28, 2015, the EPA 

proposed a limited approval and limited 

disapproval of the rules listed in Table 

1 that were submitted for incorporation 

into the California SIP. 80 FR 52236 

(Aug. 28, 2015). Our detailed analysis of 

these rules is provided in the TSD and 

Federal Register notice for the proposed 

rulemaking for this SIP revision 

approval action. 

TABLE 1—SUBMITTED NSR RULES

Regulation & rule No. Rule title Adopted/

amended Submitted 

Regulation 2, Rule 1 (2–1) ........................................... Permits, General Requirements ................................... 12/19/12 4/22/13 

Regulation 2, Rule 2 (2–2) ........................................... Permits, New Source Review ....................................... 12/19/12 4/22/13 

We proposed a limited approval 

because we determined that these rules 

strengthen the SIP and are largely 

consistent with the relevant CAA 

requirements. We simultaneously 

proposed a limited disapproval because 

some rule provisions conflict with CAA 

section 110, including Parts C and D, 

and the regulations implementing those 

laws. The disapproved provisions 

include the following: 

1. The definitions of ‘‘agricultural 

source’’ in Section 2–1–239 and ‘‘large 

confined animal facility’’ used in 

Section 2–1–424 rely on other 

definitions and provisions in District 

rules that are not SIP approved. (See our 

evaluation of Sections 2–1–239 and 2– 

1–424 in section 6.1.2 of the TSD.) 

2. Section 2–1–234, subparagraph 2.2, 

is deficient because it does not satisfy 

the PSD provisions at 40 CFR 

51.166(a)(7) and 51.166(r)(6) & (7), 

which require PSD programs to contain 

specific applicability procedures and 

recordkeeping provisions. (See our 

evaluation of Section 2–1–234 in 

sections 6.1.2 and 7.2.2 of the TSD.) 

3. The same deficiency discussed 

above for the PSD provisions applies to 

the nonattainment NSR provisions. 

Section 2–1–234, subparagraph 2.1, 

does not satisfy the requirements of 

51.165(a)(2) and 51.165(a)(6) & (7), 

which require nonattainment NSR 

programs to contain specific 

applicability procedures and 

recordkeeping provisions. (See our 

evaluation of Section 2–1–234 in 

sections 6.1.2 and 7.3.12 of the TSD.) 

4. The definition of the term ‘‘PSD 

pollutant’’ as defined in Section 2–2– 

223, which is used in place of the 

federal definition for the term 

‘‘regulated NSR pollutant,’’ is deficient 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES