alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.223 Petitions to intervene. ( a ) Where the order designating a matter for hearing has failed to notify and name as a party to the hearing proceeding any person who qualifies as a party in interest, such person may acquire the status of a party by filing, under oath and not more than 30 days after the publication in the Federal Register of the hearing issues or any substantial amendment thereto, a petition for intervention showing the basis of its interest. Where the person's status as a party in interest is established, the petition to intervene will be granted.
( b ) Any other person desiring to participate as a party in any hearing proceeding may file a petition for leave to intervene not later than 30 days after the publication in the Federal Register of the full text or a summary of the order designating the matter for hearing or any substantial amendment thereto. The petition must set forth the interest of petitioner in the proceedings, must show how such petitioner's participation will assist the Commission in the determination of the issues in question, must set forth any proposed issues in addition to those already designated for hearing, and must be accompanied by the affidavit of a person with knowledge as to the facts set forth in the petition. The presiding officer, in his or her discretion, may grant or deny such petition or may permit intervention by such persons limited to a particular stage of the proceeding.
( c ) Any person desiring to file a petition for leave to intervene later than 30 days after the publication in the Federal Register of the full text or a summary of the order designating the matter for hearing or any substantial amendment thereto shall set forth the interest of petitioner in the proceeding, show how such petitioner's participation will assist the Commission in the determination of the issues in question, must set forth any proposed issues in addition to those already designated for hearing, and must set forth reasons why it was not possible to file a petition within the time prescribed by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. If, in the opinion of the presiding officer, good cause is shown for the delay in filing, the presiding officer may in his or her discretion grant such petition or may permit intervention limited to particular issues or to a particular stage of the proceeding.
(Sec. 309, 48 Stat. 1085, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 309)
[85 FR 63175, Oct. 6, 2020]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

L.B., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3324

[October 12, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carlos S. Rebollo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16-1388DL.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.337 Return of service. ( a ) If service of the subpena is made by a person other than a United States marshal or his deputy such person shall make affidavit thereof, stating the date, time, and manner of service.
( b ) In case of failure to make service, the reasons for the failure shall be stated on the original subpena by the person who attempted to make service.
( c ) The original subpena, bearing or accompanied by the required return affidavit or statement, shall be returned forthwith to the Secretary of the Commission or, if so directed on the subpena, to the official before whom the person named in the subpena is required to appear.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.53 Separate pleadings for petitions for forbearance.

In order to be considered as a petition for forbearance subject to the one-year deadline set forth in 47 U.S.C. 160(c), any petition requesting that the Commission exercise its forbearance authority under 47 U.S.C. 160 shall be filed as a separate pleading and shall be identified in the caption of such pleading as a petition for forbearance under 47 U.S.C. 160(c). Any request which is not in compliance with this rule is deemed not to constitute a petition pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 160(c), and is not subject to the deadline set forth therein.

[65 FR 7460, Feb. 15, 2000]
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 10 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period March 31,
2006 (the "Report"), David J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, and President of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



DATE: MAY 12, 2006


/S/ DAVID J. JOHNSON
--------------------
DAVID J. JOHNSON
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### THEODORE B. GATES and another, Appellants, v. JOSHUA M. WHITCOMB and others, Respondents.

When an owner of land agrees to sell it to another, and advances him. money with which to build upon the premises sold, and, after completion of the houses, the builder is to secure the purchase-price and the advances by mortgage, the relation of owner and contractor does not subsist as between the parties, under the lien act * In such cases the person who agrees to purchase, builds by permission of the owner, and the property is chargeable with the lien until the deed is actually delivered, without regard to the terms of the contract of purchase.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiff’s complaint. The action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

*Theodore B. Gates,*appellant, in person.

*William W. Goodrich,*for the respondents.

*

Hart v. Wheeler, 1 N. Y. S. C. (T. & C.), 403.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.

Present—Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Tappen, JJ.

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted at Special Term, costs to abide event.
No. 11-9178.

#### Green *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Cer-tiorari denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 1240

_____________________________ T.H., Father o f C.J.H., E.C.H., E.B.H., B.C.H., Minor Children
, Appellant,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. Ross M. Goodman , Judge

. September 3, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , J AY , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Kari Jorma Myllynen, Land O' Lakes
, for Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Children's Legal Services, for Appellee Department of Children and Families, Tallahassee; Shannon McLin and William D. Palmer of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, The Villages; Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office
, Talla hassee

.
#### § 105-8.153-1 General.

GSA, upon request from an occupant agency engaged in the development of a transition plan under section 504, shall participate with the occupant agency in the development and implementation of the transition plan and shall provide information and guidance to the occupant agency. Upon request, GSA shall conduct space inspections to assist the agency in determining whether a current assignment of space results in one or more of the occupant agency's programs or activities being inaccessible. GSA shall provide the occupant agency with a written summary of significant findings and recommendations, together with data concerning programmed repairs and alterations planned by GSA and alterations that can be effected by the agency.
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350

CERTIFICATION



The undersigned officer hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation for the quarter ended June 26, 2005 as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE Corporation.



Signed August 4, 2005.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ John C. Fanning                 
|John C. Fanning,                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





25
§ 302-9.603 What governing policies must we establish for the allowances for transportation and emergency storage of a POV? You must establish policies governing: ( a ) When you will authorize transportation and emergency storage of a POV;
( b ) When you will authorize transportation of a replacement POV;
( c ) Who will determine if transportation of a POV to or from a post of duty is in the interest of the Government;
( d ) Who will determine if conditions have changed at an employee's post of duty to warrant transportation of a POV in the interest of the Government;
( e ) Who will determine if transportation of a POV wholly within CONUS is more advantageous and cost effective than having the employee drive the POV to the new official station; and
( f ) Who will determine whether to allow emergency storage of an employee's POV, including where to store the POV.
[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18342, Apr. 1, 2011 and further redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2011-06, 76 FR 71890, Nov. 21, 2011]
No. 11-75.

#### C *&*J Coupe Family Limited Partnership *v.*County of Hawaii et al.

Sup. Ct. Haw. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
      32(b)








This
      Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
      subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document
      pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such
      filing.








Certification
      Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of
      Title
      18 of the United States Code








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of the Companies (as defined below) on
      Form
      10-Q (the “Reports”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly Keller
      Koeppel, the chief financial officer of





Appalachian
      Power Company





(the
      “Companies”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i)
      the Reports fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
      Reports fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Companies.








/s/
      Holly Keller Koeppel


Holly
      Keller Koeppel


Chief
      Financial Officer








May
      4,
      2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
      Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
#### § 105-68.875 May I ask the debarring official to reconsider a decision to debar me?

Yes, as a debarred person you may ask the debarring official to reconsider the debarment decision or to reduce the time period or scope of the debarment. However, you must put your request in writing and support it with documentation.
063P16

#### State v. Michael Anthony York

1. Defs *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-419)

1. Denied

2. Def’s *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Denied
From: Baldyga, Lyndsey [LBaldyga@tecoenergy.com]

Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:03 AM

To: Hofmeister, Art

Cc: Lukcic, David M.; Burrows, Byron T.

Subject: RE: Additional Info

Art,

The answers to your questions can be seen below. Please let me know if any additional information is

needed. We look forward to seeing the draft permit.

Thank you,

Lyndsey Baldyga

Environmental Health & Safety

Air Programs: Engineer I

Phone: 813

- 228

- 4740

Ext. 34740

Mobile: 813

- 309

- 0376

Lbaldyga@tecoenergy.com

From: Hofmeister, Art [ mailto:Hofmeister.Art@epa.gov ]

Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:44 PM

To: Baldyga, Lyndsey

Cc: Forney, Katy; Ceron, Heather

Subject: Additional Info

Hi, Lyndsey:

Can you give us an idea of when we can expect to receive the following information?

1) The proposed apportioning methodology for the STG; and

TEC proposes that we apportion the ST MWs by using the CT MWs.

2) Whether the proposed GHG BACT limits for the CTs/HRSGs are acceptable (for including periods

of startup/shutdown)?

To maintain the current project schedule, TEC agrees to leave the limit as proposed in the

permit application including startup and shutdown.

Ideally, we would like to have it by Sep t. 9 th so that we can keep to our current schedule to go to public

notice by Sept. 13 th

.

Thanks.

Art HofmeisterEnvironmental Engineer

Air Permits Section

EPA Region 4

(404) 562

- 9115



### ***** This email is from an external sender. Be cautious about clicking links or opening

attachments from unknow n sources. *****

NOTICE: This email is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have

received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately, delete this email from your system and do not copy or d isclose it to

anyone else. Although we take precautions to protect against viruses, we advise you to take your own precautions to protect against viruses

as we accept no liability for any which remain.
EXHIBIT 31.3

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arthur V. Conover, III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Environmental
Solutions Worldwide, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other Certifying Officer's and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 12, 2004


/s/ Arthur V. Conover, III
--------------------------
Arthur V. Conover, III
Controller
§ 201-1.102 Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC). ( a ) *Composition.* The following agencies and agency components shall be represented on the FASC: ( 1 ) Office of Management and Budget;
( 2 ) General Services Administration;
( 3 ) Department of Homeland Security;
( 4 ) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency;
( 5 ) Office of the Director of National Intelligence;
( 6 ) National Counterintelligence and Security Center;
( 7 ) Department of Justice;
( 8 ) Federal Bureau of Investigation;
( 9 ) Department of Defense;
( 10 ) National Security Agency;
( 11 ) Department of Commerce;
( 12 ) National Institute of Standards and Technology; and
( 13 ) Any other executive agency, or agency component, as determined by the Chairperson of the FASC.
( b ) *FASC information requests.* The FASC may request such information from executive agencies as is necessary for the FASC to carry out its functions, including evaluation of sources and covered articles for purposes of determining whether to recommend the issuance of removal or exclusion orders, and the receiving executive agency shall provide the requested information to the fullest extent possible.
( c ) *Consultation and coordination with other councils.* The FASC will consult and coordinate, as appropriate, with other relevant councils and interagency committees, including the Chief Information Officers Council, the Chief Acquisition Officers Council, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, with respect to supply chain risks posed by the acquisition and use of covered articles.
( d ) *Program office and committees.* The FASC may establish a program office and any committees, working groups, or other constituent bodies the FASC deems appropriate, in its sole and unreviewable discretion, to carry out its functions. Such a committee, working group, or other constituent body is authorized to perform any function lawfully delegated to it by the FASC.
#### § 0.493 Non-radio common carrier applications.

All such applications shall be filed at the Commission's offices in Washington, DC.

[28 FR 12413, Nov. 22, 1963. Redesignated at 32 FR 10578, July 19, 1967]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.717 Procedure.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 4162, Jan. 22, 2024.

The Commission will forward informal complaints to the appropriate carrier for investigation and may set a due date for the carrier to provide a written response to the informal complaint to the Commission, with a copy to the complainant. The response will advise the Commission of the carrier's satisfaction of the complaint or of its refusal or inability to do so. Where there are clear indications from the carrier's response or from other communications with the parties that the complaint has been satisfied, the Commission may, in its discretion, consider a complaint proceeding to be closed. In all other cases, the Commission will notify the complainant that if the complainant is not satisfied by the carrier's response, or if the carrier has failed to submit a response by the due date, the complainant may file a formal complaint in accordance with § 1.721.

[83 FR 44831, Sept. 4, 2018]
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Angelica Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 25, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen M. O'Hara, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

            (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly
                      presents, in all material respects, the financial
                      condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 8, 2003

                                     /s/ Stephen M. O'Hara
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Stephen M. O'Hara
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer
                                     of Angelica Corporation