alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6936
In Re: MILTON J. TAYLOR, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-99-615-AM) Submitted: October 20, 1999 Decided: November 9, 1999 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Milton J. Taylor, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Milton Taylor, a federal prisoner, petitions for a writ of mandamus. Taylor contends that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum attendant to his crime of conviction because when his three-year term of supervised release is added to his 27-month term of imprisonment, the aggregate sentence exceeds the five-year maximum sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 1708 (1994). He seeks an order compelling the district court to grant relief on his sentence. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary situations. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). To the extent that Taylor seeks review of district court’s non-dispositive orders in his pending habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994), his mandamus petition must be denied. See id. Further, Taylor does not have a clear right to the relief sought. The sentencing court clearly had the authority to impose a term of supervised release over and above any term of imprisonment, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(a) (West Supp. 1999), so Taylor’s claim of error is meritless.3 We deny the mandamus petition and Taylor’s “Motion for an Emergency Alternative Writ.” Further, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit
      13.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. § 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
      C. Evans, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:




1.    
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.    
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      June 29, 2007




/s/
                Patrick C. EvansName:
                Patrick C. EvansTitle:
                President and Chief Executive
                Officer
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 60-1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart A appear at 85 FR 71570, Nov. 10, 2020.

§ 60-1.11 Payment or reimbursement of membership fees and other expenses to private clubs. ( a ) ( 1 ) A contractor which maintains a policy or practice of paying membership fees or other expenses for employee participation in private clubs or organizations shall ensure that the policy or practice is administered without regard to the race, color, religion, sex, or national origin of employees.
( 2 ) Payment or reimbursement by contractors of membership fees and other expenses for participation by their employees in a private club or organization which bars, restricts or limits its membership on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, or national origin constitutes a violation of Executive Order 11246 except where the contractor can provide evidence that such restrictions or limitations do not abridge the promotional opportunities, status, compensation or other terms and conditions of employment of those of its employees barred from membership because of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. OFCCP shall provide the contractor with the opportunity to present evidence in defense of its actions.
( b ) The contractor has the responsibility of determining whether the club or organization restricts membership on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The contractor may make separate determinations for different chapters of an organization, and where it does so, may limit any necessary corrective action to the particular chapters which observe discriminatory membership policies and practices.
[46 FR 3896, Jan. 16, 1981] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 46 FR 3896, Jan. 16, 1981, § 60-1.11 was added. At 46 FR 18951, Mar. 27, 1981, the effective date was deferred until further notice.
Opinion issued March 13 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 17 - 00581 - CV

——————————— BRAD JONES , Appella nt

V. THIRD MILLENNIUM CAP ITAL , Appell e e On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2015 - 19785
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Brad Jones , has failed to timely file a brief. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismis sal2

of case). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown
.
No. 11-9081.

No. 11-9198.

No. 11-9406.

No. 11-9432.

#### Birdette *v.*Wellstar Health Systems Cobb Hospital. Harrington *v.*Harrington. In re Wright; and Chong Hao Su *v.*City of Cincinnati, Ohio.

C. A. 11th Cir.;

App. Ct. Mass.;

Ct. App. Ohio, Hamilton County. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied. Petitioners are allowed until June 4, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10-O-10


Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Metrics for 2017




On February 8, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved the specific performance goals and business criteria to be used for purposes of determining any future performance-based restricted stock unit final awards for the 2017 performance-period for participants, including executive officers, under the Company’s shareholder-approved 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008).


The performance based restricted stock unit grant is a target opportunity; however, participants will have the opportunity to earn a maximum of up to 200% of the target.  The performance based restricted stock unit grant has a three-year performance period (2017-2019), after which the Compensation Committee will determine the final award based on corporate performance-to-objectives. The maximum performance level that can be achieved for any single metric for the 2017 Performance Unit grants is 200%. 75% of the final award will be based on financial metrics and 25% will be based on relative Total Shareholder Return of Ford’s common stock compared to a peer group of companies over the three-year performance period.  The metrics and weightings are summarized below:




	
		
	Financial Metrics - 75%
	 

	Metrics
	Weighting

	Automotive Segment Revenue
Automotive Segment Operating Margin
Ford Credit Pre-tax Profit
Automotive Segment Operating Cash Flow
	25%
40%
10%
25%
100%

	 
	 






	
		
	 
	 

	Total Shareholder Return - 25%
	 

	Metric
	Weighting

	Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
	100%
Appendix B 

Mobile Budgets and 

Correspondence 
1

Gowins, John (EEC)

From: Fred Durham [FDURHAM@wvdep.org]

Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:07 AM

To: Gowins, John (EPPC DEP DAQ)

Subject: Fwd: NOx insignificance - Parkersburg

Attachments: draft_parkersburg_insign.doc

John: 

It is Region 3 that is saying the rationale looks sufficient. 

No letter but an e-mail. 

Fred 

>>> <Goold.Megan@epamail.epa.gov> 4/3/2008 2:46 PM >>> 

Fred, 

Good news - Looks like OTAQ agrees that this area qualifies for 

insignificance under 40 CFR 93.109(k) for regional on-road NOx in your 

PM2.5 attainment SIP. 

Attached is the document with comments included. In addition, the 

spreadsheet that you attached should be included in the SIP submission. 

The part of the narrative that discusses the decision factors in 93.109 

(k) says that NOx motor vehicle emissions are less than 10% (p. 4) isn't 

as clear as it could be. That fact is true for the base year and not 

the attainment year. But it's the attainment year where the percentage 

is relevant. It would be more clear to say something along the lines 

of: "motor vehicle emissions in WV are less than 10% in the base year, 

2002; and they decline from 2002 to 2009. For more information refer to 

the table in appendix X." 

Please let me know if you have any further questions. 

Megan 

(See attached file: draft_parkersburg_insign.doc) 

_________________________________________ 

Megan S. Goold 

Environmental Scientist 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

Air Protection Division (3AP23) 

Energy, Radiation & Indoor Environment Branch 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Phone: 215-814-2027
§ 301-73.2 What are our responsibilities as participants in the Federal travel management program? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77027 , Sept. 20, 2024.
As a participant in the Federal travel management program, you must— ( a ) Designate an authorized representative to administer the program including leading your agency's migration of ETS;
( b ) Ensure that you have internal policies and procedures in place to govern use of the program including a plan and timeline to implement ETS no later than December 31, 2004, with agency-wide migration to ETS completed no later than September 30, 2006;
( c ) Establish a plan that will measure direct and indirect cost savings and management efficiencies through the use of ETS once deployed. This plan must include your migration plan and schedule which must be submitted by March 31, 2004 to the E-Gov Travel Program Management Office (PMO) (*see* § 301-73.101);
( d ) Require employees to use ETS in lieu of your TMS as soon as it becomes available in your agency (unless an exception has been granted in accordance with § 301-73.102 or § 301-73.104), but no later than September 30, 2006; and
( e ) Ensure that any agency-contracted travel agency services (TMS) complement and support ETS in an efficient and cost effective manner.
[FTR Amdt. 2003-07, 68 FR 71030, Dec. 22, 2003, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61540, Oct. 31, 2007]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 581 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 581

  To provide for the retention of the name of the geologic formation 
known as ``Devils Tower'' at the Devils Tower National Monument in the 
                           State of Wyoming.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

  Mr. Cubin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the retention of the name of the geologic formation 
known as ``Devils Tower'' at the Devils Tower National Monument in the 
                           State of Wyoming.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, notwithstanding 
any other authority of law, the mountain located 44 deg.42'58" N., by 
104 deg.35'32" W., shall continue to be named and referred to for all 
purposes as Devils Tower.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 302-9.302 How many POV's may I be authorized to transport within CONUS?

You may be authorized to transport only the number of POVs equal to the number of people on the relocation travel orders, who are licensed drivers, not to exceed two, while relocating within CONUS at Government expense under this Chapter. Your agency must determine that such transportation is advantageous and cost effective to the Government in accordance with § 302-9.301. A vehicle may not be shipped as PBP&E.

[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18342, Apr. 1, 2011]
§ 51-8.6 Responses to Requests. ( a ) *In general.* The Committee should, to the extent practicable, communicate with requesters having access to the internet using electronic means, such as email or web portal.
( b ) *Acknowledgment of requests.* The Committee shall acknowledge the request and assign it an individualized tracking number if it will take longer than 10 working days to process. The Committee shall include in the acknowledgement a brief description of the records sought to allow requesters to more easily keep track of their requests.
( c ) *Grants of requests.* When the Committee makes a determination to grant a request in full or in part, it shall notify the requester in writing. The Committee shall inform the requester of any fees charged under subpart 51-8.10 of this part and shall disclose the requested records to the requester promptly upon payment of any applicable fees. The Committee must inform the requester of the availability of the FOIA Public Liaison to offer assistance.
( d ) *Adverse determinations of requests.* If the Committee makes an adverse determination denying a request in any respect, the requester will be notified in writing. Adverse determinations, or denials of requests, include decisions that: The requested record is exempt, in whole or in part; the request does not reasonably describe the records sought; the information requested is not a record subject to the FOIA; the requested record does not exist, cannot be located, or has been destroyed; or the requested record is not readily reproducible in the form or format sought by the requester. Adverse determinations also include denials involving fees or fee waiver matters or denials of requests for expedited processing.
( e ) *Content of denial.* The denial will be signed by the Executive Director or designee and include: ( 1 ) The name and title or position of the person responsible for the denial;
( 2 ) A brief statement of the reasons for the denial, including any FOIA exemption applied in denying the request;
( 3 ) An estimate of the volume of any records or information withheld, such as the number of pages or some other reasonable form of estimation, although such an estimate is not required if the volume is otherwise indicated by deletions marked on records that are disclosed in part or if providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption;
( 4 ) A statement that the denial may be appealed under subpart 51-8.8 of this part, and a description of the appeal requirements set forth therein; and
( 5 ) A statement notifying the requester of the assistance available from the Committee's FOIA Public Liaison and the dispute resolution services offered by Office of Government Information Services (OGIS).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16048]



[[Page 39379]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB) Oak Ridge. The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law No. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) 
requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, July 5, 2000: 6:00-9:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Garden Plaza, 215 S. Illinois Avenue, Oak Ridge, TN.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Adler, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-90, 
Oak Ridge, TN 37831, (865) 576-4049.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE and its regulators in the areas of environmental 
restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda:
    1. Waste disposal options, presented by representatives from 
Envirocare, the Nevada Test Site, and the Waste Isolation Plant 
Program.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Carol Davis at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received 5 days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Each individual wishing to make public 
comment will be provided a maximum of 5 minutes to present their 
comments at the end of the meeting. This notice is being published less 
than 15 days before the date of the meeting due to programmatic issues 
that had to be resolved prior to publication.
    Minutes: Minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Department of Energy's Information Resource 
Center at 105 Broadway, Oak Ridge, TN between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. 
Monday through Friday, or by writing to Dave Adler, Department of 
Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-90, Oak Ridge, TN 
37831, or by calling him at (865) 576-4049.

    Issued at Washington, DC on June 20, 2000.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-16048 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                          REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or
                    RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          (AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

              I, Floyd Warkol,  as Chief  Executive  Officer of KSW, Inc.,  (the
"Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1) the  accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 14, 2007


                                                        /s/ Floyd Warkol
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Floyd Warkol
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
FY 2022 Q2 FOIA Quarterly Report

Agency

Corporation for National and Community Service

Reporting Quarter 

2022

10 Oldest Requests

Did your agency have 10 or more perfected requests pending at the end of the last fiscal year? If so, please select 

the number 10. If your agency had fewer than 10, please select the correct number.

Of the ten or fewer requests identified in your previous response, please select the number of requests your

agency has closed during the current fiscal year.

FOIA Requests Information

Component Requests Received in Requests Processed Requests Backlogged as of

Reporting Quarter in Reporting Quarter End of Reporting Quarter

CNCS 12 4

Q29

10 15
#### § 302-9.10 For what transportation expenses will my agency pay?

When your agency authorizes transportation of your POV, it will pay for all necessary and customary expenses directly related to the transportation of the POV, including crating and packing expenses, shipping charges, and port charges for readying the POV for shipment at the port of embarkation, and for use at the port of debarkation.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2011-06, 76 FR 71889, Nov. 21, 2011]
§ 301-72.2 May we utilize methods of transportation other than common carrier (e.g., POVs, chartered vehicles, etc.)? Yes, but only when use of common carrier transportation: ( a ) Would interfere with the performance of official business;
( b ) Would impose an undue hardship upon the traveler; or
( c ) When the total cost by common carrier would exceed the cost of the other method of transportation.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1494-197, Oklahoma]


Grand River Dam Authority; Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

June 23, 2000.
    An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. 
The EA analyzes the environmental impacts of Grand River Dam 
Authority's (GRDA) application to grant a permit to John W. Mayes 
(applicant) to install 9 boat docks with 84 slips in Grand Lake O' The 
Cherokees (Grand Lake), the reservoir for the Pensacola Hydroelectric 
Project. GRDA's proposed permit would also allow the applicant to 
dredge about 33,557 cubic yards of sediment to improve boat access from 
the docks to Grand Lake. The Pensacola Project is on the Grand (Nesho) 
River in Craig, Delaware, Mayes, and Ottawa Counties, Oklahoma.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Energy Projects, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. In the EA, Commission staff 
conclude that approving GRDA's application to grant the permit would 
not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the 
quality of the human environment. Copies of the EA can be viewed on the 
web at www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm. Call (202) 208-2222 for 
assistance. Copies are also available for inspection and reproduction 
at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, 
NE, Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16424 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document has been coded “B” May be requested under the Freedom of 

Information Act Http:// www.epa.gov/pesticide/foia but access is 

restricted to entities not engaged in the production sale or distribution 

of pesticides outside the United States