alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

In re: THE CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC.,

Petitioner

______________________ 

2019-111

______________________ 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United 

States Court of International Trade in No. 1:19-cv-00017, 

Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves. 

______________________ 

ON PETITION

______________________ 

Before NEWMAN, MOORE, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

 The Chamberlain Group, Inc. seeks a writ of mandamus that would vacate the temporary restraining order

(TRO) entered by the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) on February 11, 2019.* The International 

* The petition also sought an order directing the CIT 

“not [to] proceed further with the adjudication of Chamberlain’s patent rights without according Chamberlain 

full party-intervenor status.” However, after the petition 

 

Case: 19-111 Document: 29 Page: 1 Filed: 03/07/2019
2 IN RE: THE CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. 

Trade Commission supports the petition. One World 

Technologies, Inc. opposes, as do the United States, the 

Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border 

Protection, and the Acting Commissioner of Customs. 

Having considered the papers, the court deems it the 

appropriate course here to deny the mandamus petition 

with the understanding that the jurisdictional issues will 

be timely resolved. 

Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The petition is denied. 

 FOR THE COURT

 Mar 7, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

s32

was filed, the CIT granted Chamberlain’s motion to 

intervene and fully participate as a party in the case.

 

Case: 19-111 Document: 29 Page: 2 Filed: 03/07/2019
§ 302-7.2 What is the maximum weight of HHG that may be transported or stored at Government expense? ( a ) The maximum weight allowance of HHG that may be shipped or stored at Government expense is 18,000 pounds net weight. For uncrated or van line shipments, a 2,000 pound allowance is added to the 18,000 pounds net weight allowance to cover packing materials for the shipment. In no case may a shipment weigh over 20,000 gross pounds (the 18,000 pounds net weight of the uncrated HHG plus the 2,000 pound allowance for packing materials). The relocating employee is responsible for reimbursing the Government for all costs incurred if the shipment is overweight. For determining the weight of crated shipments, containerized shipments, and constructive weight for other types of household good shipments, please *see* the chart in § 302-7.13.
( b ) An agency may establish a lower net weight allowance and a lower allowance for packing materials in special circumstances, such as transferring an employee into government-furnished quarters.
[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18339, Apr. 1, 2011]
§ 51-2.9 Oral presentations by interested persons at Committee meetings. ( a ) Upon written request from an interested person, that person may, at the discretion of the Committee Chair, be permitted to appear before the Committee to present views orally. Generally, only those persons who have raised significant issues which, if valid, could influence the Committee's decision in the matter under consideration will be permitted to appear.
( b ) When the Chair has approved the appearance before the Committee of an interested person who has made a written request: ( 1 ) The name of the spokesperson and the names of any other persons planning to appear shall be provided to the Committee staff by telephone at least three working days before the meeting.
( 2 ) In the absence of prior authorization by the Chair, only one person representing a particular agency or organization will be permitted to speak.
( 3 ) Oral statements to the Committee and written material provided in conjunction with the oral statements shall be limited to issues addressed in written comments which have previously been submitted to the Committee as the result of notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register.
( 4 ) Written material to be provided in conjunction with the oral presentation and an outline of the presentation shall be submitted to the Committee staff at least three working days before the meeting.
( c ) The Committee may also invite other interested persons to make oral presentations at Committee meetings when it determines that these persons can provide information which will assist the Committee in making a decision on a proposed addition to the Procurement List. Terms of appearance of such persons shall be determined by the Chair.
#### IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES A. PEMBERTON.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 652)

(383 SE2d 878)

Per curiam.

Respondent Charles A. Pemberton was found guilty of violating Standards 22 (b) and 44 of Rule 4-102 of the State Bar Rules. The complainants, husband and wife, employed respondent to represent them in a medical malpractice suit. They initially paid him $500 to investigate the viability of the action, and, later, paid him $2,500 for costs during the time he represented them. Respondent filed a claim on behalf of the clients, which was dismissed by operation of law eight years later. Respondent refused to return the clients’ papers, refused to account for or refund any of the money paid him by the clients, and failed to file a response to a complaint with the State Disciplinary Board.

*434Decided September 28, 1989.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Paula J. Frederick, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Based upon these violations, the Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board recommended that respondent be disbarred pursuant to State Bar Rule 4-103. We adopt that recommendation. Therefore, Charles A. Pemberton is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Georgia.

*All the Justices concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1952 Use and disclosure of mailing addresses. ( a ) When attempting to locate a debtor in order to collect or compromise a debt under this subpart or other authority, the Commission may send a request to the Secretary of the Treasury (or designee) to obtain a debtor's mailing address from the records of the Internal Revenue Service.
( b ) The Commission is authorized to use mailing addresses obtained under paragraph (a) of this section to enforce collection of a delinquent debt and may disclose such mailing addresses to other agencies and to collection agencies for collection purposes.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4417 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4417

  To authorize appropriations for a retirement incentive for certain 
                  employees of National Laboratories.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1994

Mr. Richardson (for himself and Mr. Baker of California) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Armed 
              Services and Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize appropriations for a retirement incentive for certain 
                  employees of National Laboratories.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That there is 
authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy for the 
California Public Employees Retirement System such sums as may be 
necessary for an early retirement incentive established by the 
University of California that is--
            (1) commensurate with the program known as Voluntary Early 
        Retirement Incentive III provided to members of the University 
        of California Retirement Program; and
            (2) offered during the 90-day period beginning on January 
        1, 1995, to individuals who are enrolled in the California 
        Public Employees Retirement System and who are employed by the 
        University of California in positions at the Los Alamos 
        National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, or 
        Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory that are paid for with Federal 
        funds.

                                 <all>
```
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2012

- Directorate Identifier: 

### 2012

- NE

- - AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

co st (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### PW100 PT1 blade inspection or replacement at 25% failure rate 1.5 $ 127.50 $0 $ 127.50 

### 540 $ 68,850.00



### Replacement parts cost $ 0.00 $6,000 $ 6,000.00 

### 135 $ 810,000.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 878,850 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : 

### 540 engines affected, estimate 25% fall

- out rate or 135.

**Executive Order 12866:**

Could the AD be considered a “s ignificant regulatory action”?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for
either a Yes or No answer.
YES NO Explanation:
**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?
YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Exhibit 99.4


 





	Elliott
        Associates, L.P.

        Elliott
        International, L.P.

        Elliott
        International Capital Advisors Inc.

        40
        West 57th Street

        New
        York, NY 10019
	Bluescape
        Energy Partners LLC

        BEP
        Special Situations 2 LLC

        200
        Crescent Court, Suite 1900

        Dallas,
        Texas 75201





 


TERMINATION
AGREEMENT


 


Reference
is made to that certain Amended and Restated Agreement by and between Elliott Associates, L.P. (“EALP”), Elliott International,
L.P. (“EILP”) and Elliott International Capital Advisors Inc. (together with EALP and EILP, “Elliott”)
and Bluescape Energy Partners LLC (“BEP”) and BEP Special Situations 2 LLC (together with BEP, “Bluescape”),
dated as of January 16, 2017 (the “Original Agreement”). Pursuant to Section 7 of the Original Agreement, Elliott
and Bluescape hereby mutually agree to terminate the Original Agreement, effective immediately (the “Termination”).
Each of Elliott and Bluescape hereby agree and acknowledge that as of the execution hereof (i) they have no agreement, arrangement
or understanding whatsoever among themselves with respect to the acquisition, holding, voting or disposition of securities of
NRG Energy, Inc. and (ii) each may vote or dispose of any securities of NRG Energy, Inc. that they may beneficially own in their
sole discretion, subject to any contractual obligations each may have to other third parties. For the avoidance of doubt, Sections
4 and 10 of the Original Agreement shall survive the Termination.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


[The
remainder of this page was intentionally left blank.]


 









     

     


    

 


The
parties have caused this Termination Agreement to be executed as of February 13, 2017.


  


	 	ELLIOTT
                                         ASSOCIATES, L.P.



	 	 	 
	 	By:	Elliott
    Capital Advisors, L.P.,
	 	 	its
    General Partner
	 	 	 
	 	By:	Braxton
                                         Associates, Inc.,






	 	 	its
    General Partner
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Elliot Greenberg
	 	Name:	Elliot
                                         Greenberg




	 	Title:	Vice
    President
	 	 	 
	 	ELLIOTT
                                         INTERNATIONAL, L.P.



	 	 	 
	 	By:	Elliott
    International Capital Advisors Inc.,
	 	 	as
    Attorney-in-Fact
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Elliot Greenberg
	 	Name:	Elliot
                                         Greenberg




	 	Title:	Vice
    President
	 	 	 
	 	ELLIOTT
                                         INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL ADVISORS INC.



	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Elliot Greenberg
	 	Name:	Elliot
                                         Greenberg




	 	Title:	Vice
    President
	 	 	 
	 	BLUESCAPE
                                         ENERGY PARTNERS LLC



	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Jonathan Siegler
	 	Name:	Jonathan
    Siegler
	 	Title:	Chief
    Financial Officer
	 	 	 
	 	BEP
                                         SPECIAL SITUATIONS 2 LLC



	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Jonathan Siegler
	 	Name:	Jonathan
    Siegler
	 	Title:	Chief
    Financial Officer
Exhibit



Exhibit 10(e)7





ALLETE Executive Annual Incentive Plan
Form of Award
Effective 2017
[Eligible Superior Water, Light and Power Executive Employees]


Target Award Opportunity






	
		
	Base Salary
	$

	 
	 

	Times
	 

	 
	 

	Award Opportunity (percent of base salary)
	%

	 
	 

	Equals
	 

	 
	 

	Target Award 
	$






Performance Levels and Award Amounts




	
			
	Goal Performance Level
	Payout as Percent of 
Target Award
	Award Amount 

	Superior
	200% 
	$

	Target
	100% 
	$

	Threshold
	37.5% 
	$

	Below Threshold
	0% 
	$








Goals


	
									
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Goal

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Weighting

	 
	Financial Goals
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	ALLETE Net Income
	20%

	 
	 
	Superior Water Light & Power Net Income
	 
	55%

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Strategic & Operational Positioning Goals
	 
	 
	 
	25%

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	100%






Compensation Subject to Compensation Recovery Policy


Annual Incentive Plan Compensation is subject to recoupment as defined in the Compensation Recovery policy.
Administrative Order No. 2022-06

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

O R D E R

By order of the Chief Judge, the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit will be closed on Friday, 

November 25, 2022, in addition to the federal holiday of 

Thursday, November 24, 2022.

For purposes of computation of time and motions to 

enlarge time under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 

and Federal Circuit Rule 26, November 25, 2022, will be 

considered a “legal holiday.”

FOR THE COURT

October 4, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

CERTIFIED COPY

I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS DOCUMENT IS A 

TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE 

ORIGINAL ON FILE. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

PETER R. MARKSTEINER, CLERK OF COURT By Deputy Clerk: Date: Patrick B. Chesnut October 4, 2022
No. 11-5085.

#### Smith *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
#### § 0.423 Information bulletins.

Information bulletins and fact sheets containing information about communications issues and the Federal Communications Commission are available on the Commission's web site at *www.fcc.gov, ftp.fcc.gov* or may be requested from the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau.

[64 FR 60722, Nov. 8, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 13221, Mar. 21, 2002]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4557-N-26]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 30, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clifford Taffet, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: June 22, 2000.

Fred Karnas, Jr.,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 00-16243 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Decker, Malveaux and Senior Judge Annunziata 

MARTA RIVAS 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1497-16-4 PER CURIAM 

 FEBRUARY 21, 2017 

MOM’S APPLE PIE COMPANY 

 AND TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Thomas F. Hennessy; Virginia Employment and Family Law 

Office, on brief), for appellant. 

 (Andrew H.D. Wilson; Stephen A. Marshall; Two Rivers Law 

Group, P.C., on brief), for appellees. 

 Marta Rivas (“claimant”) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission 

(“the Commission”) finding that she committed a willful breach of a workplace safety rule. We 

have reviewed the record and the Commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without 

merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Commission in its final opinion. See 

Rivas v. Mom’s Apple Pie Co., JCN VA00001074330 (Aug. 12, 2016).1 We dispense with oral 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

1

 While claimant argues that the Commission erred by applying a negligence standard in 

assessing whether her violation of a workplace safety rule precluded the recovery of benefits, she 

failed to raise this argument below and therefore has not preserved it for appeal. See Rule 

5A:18. The language from the Commission’s opinion which claimant contends reflected 

application of a negligence standard was a direct quote from the deputy commissioner’s opinion. 

Claimant did not request review of the deputy commissioner’s opinion on this basis and did not 

object to the legal standard applied by the Commission or file a motion to reconsider or a motion 

for rehearing after the Commission rendered its decision. See Williams v. Gloucester Sheriff’s 

Dep’t, 266 Va. 409, 411, 587 S.E.2d 546, 548 (2003) (“the requirement that a litigant file a 

motion for rehearing or reconsideration to preserve an issue for appeal . . . is not a new 

requirement”); Hodnett v. Stanco Masonry, Inc., 58 Va. App. 244, 253, 708 S.E.2d 429, 434 

(2011) (refusing to consider an issue on appeal when claimant did not file a motion to 

reconsider). 

UNPUBLISHED 
- 2 - 

argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code 

§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000006814
<NAME>                        COMFORCE Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998   
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998   
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                               1,853   
<SECURITIES>                                             0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                       86,349   
<ALLOWANCES>                                           582   
<INVENTORY>                                              0   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    96,446   
<PP&E>                                               6,682   
<DEPRECIATION>                                         955   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     250,061   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               42,012   
<BONDS>                                            130,000   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0   
<PREFERRED>                                              1   
<COMMON>                                               156   
<OTHER-SE>                                          40,804   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       250,061   
<SALES>                                            112,007   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   112,007   
<CGS>                                               91,706   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      106,992   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       (16)  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5,159   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (128)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                           329   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (457)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0   
<CHANGES>                                                0   
<NET-INCOME>                                          (463)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.03)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.03)  
                                                             
                                               

</TABLE>