alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

---

Exhibit 15.2

| |                                              |                                                                                                                                                                       
| | -------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | ZIV HAFT
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.) | Head Office: Amot Bituach House Building B
46-48 Menachem Begin Road, Tel-Aviv 66184
Tel: +972 3 638 6868 Fax: +972 3 639 4320
E-mail: zivhaft@bdo.co.il www.bdo.co.il

Board of Directors
Lumenis Ltd.
Yokneam, Israel

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statement (333-148460) on Form S-8 of
Lumenis Ltd., of our report dated June 25, 2008 with respect to the consolidated
balance sheet of Lumenis Ltd. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity
(capital deficiency) and cash flows for both of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2007, which report appears in the annual report on Form 20-F of
Lumenis Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

| |  | /s/ Ziv HaftZiv Haft
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
A BDO member firm
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tel Aviv, Israel
June 29, 2009



---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
American Financial Corporation 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        $311,061
<SECURITIES>                                10,571,811<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  709,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,976,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        343,732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     72,154
<COMMON>                                         9,625
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,312,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,976,047
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,504,148
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               263,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                213,660
<INCOME-TAX>                                    78,257
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            135,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,849)
<CHANGES>                                      (3,854)
<NET-INCOME>                                  127,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Includes an investment in investee of $191 million.
<F2>Not applicable since all common shares are owned by American
Financial Group, Inc.
</FN>



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21
                                
         SUBSIDIARIES OF DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                
                                    State of                 Names Under Which
                                  Incorporation               Subsidiary Does
           Subsidiary            or Organization                  Business
     ---------------------       -----------------        ---------------------

     Duke Realty Services            Indiana               Duke Realty Services
       Limited Partnership                                  Limited Partnership
     
     Duke Realty Construction,       Indiana               Duke Realty 
        Inc.                                                Construction, Inc.

     Duke Construction Limited       Indiana               Duke Construction
       Partnership                                          Limited Partnership
     
     B/D Limited Partnership         Indiana               B/D Limited 
                                                            Partnership
     
     Lamida Partners Limited         Ohio                  Lamida Partners 
       Partnership                                          Limited Partnership

     Duna Developers                 Ohio                  Duna Developers
     
     Kenwood Office Associates       Ohio                  Kenwood Office 
                                                            Associates   
     
     Park Creek Venture              Indiana               Park Creek Venture
     
     Parkrite Limited                Indiana               Parkrite Limited 
       Partnership                                          Partnership

     Post Road Limited               Indiana               Post Road Limited
       Partnership                                          Partnership

     Shadeland Station Office        Indiana               Shadeland Station 
       Associates II Limited                                Office Associates
       Partnership                                          II Limited
                                                            Partnership
     
     SCRED Ohio Limited              Ohio                  SCRED Ohio Limited 
       Partnership                                          Partnership

     Dugan Realty L.L.C.             Indiana               Dugan Realty L.L.C.
     
     Duke/Tees Joint Venture         Indiana               Duke/Tees J.V.
     
     Park Fletcher Limited           Indiana               Park Fletcher
       Partnership 2728                                     Limited
                                                            Partnership 2728

     Cincinnati Development          Ohio                  Cincinnati 
       Group L.L.C.                                         Development
                                                            Group L.L.C.
H. R. 4191

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 9630 Estate Thomas

in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ‘‘Aubrey C. Ottley Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States Post Office building located at 9630 Estate

Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Aubrey C. Ottley Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the building referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Aubrey

C. Ottley Post Office.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Searched for **http://www.distraction.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.distraction.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
006P16

#### State v. Tunisia Dawson

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-420)

Denied
#### § 302-11.441 How must we determine if an employee holds equitable title interest in a property?

To determine if an employee holds equitable title interest in a property, you must follow the guidelines in § 302-11.405.

[FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12256, Feb. 16, 2024]
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 60-1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart A appear at 85 FR 71570, Nov. 10, 2020.

§ 60-1.9 Compliance by labor unions and by recruiting and training agencies. ( a ) Whenever compliance with the equal opportunity clause may necessitate a revision of a collective bargaining agreement the labor union or unions which are parties to such an agreement shall be given an adequate opportunity to present their views to the Director.
( b ) The Director shall use his best efforts, directly and through agencies, contractors, subcontractors, applicants, State and local officials, public and private agencies, and all other available instrumentalities, to cause any labor union, recruiting and training agency or other representative of workers who are or may be engaged in work under contracts and subcontracts to cooperate with, and to comply in the implementation of, the purposes of the order.
( c ) In order to effectuate the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the Director may hold hearings, public or private, with respect to the practices and policies of any such labor union or recruiting and training agency.
( d ) The Director may notify any Federal, State, or local agency of his conclusions and recommendations with respect to any such labor organization or recruiting and training agency which in his judgment has failed to cooperate with himself, agencies, prime contractors, subcontractors, or applicants in carrying out the purposes of the order. The Director also may notify the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Justice, or other appropriate Federal agencies whenever he has reason to believe that the practices of any such labor organization or agency violates title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or other provisions of Federal law.
[43 FR 49240, Oct. 20, 1978, as amended at 62 FR 66971, Dec. 22, 1997]
EXHIBIT   11

<TABLE>
                        ANDREA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

           Computation of Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share

<CAPTION>
                                                             For the Three Months Ended 
                                                                      March 31,

                                                                 1997            1996
                                                             -----------      -----------
<S>                                                          <C>              <C>
EARNINGS       
  Pro forma income (loss) applicable to common stock*        $   606,441      $  (477,909)
                                                             ===========      ===========
SHARES         
  Weighted average number of common shares outstanding         3,792,197        3,290,322
  Assuming conversion of options and warrants                    626,851          776,909
                                                             -----------      -----------
  Pro forma shares                                             4,419,048        4,067,230
                                                             ===========      ===========

  Fully diluted income (loss) per common share               $       .14      $      (.12)
                                                             ===========      ===========
          
*     Entire proceeds of assumed conversion of options were used to purchase treasury shares; therefore,
no adjustments are necessary in computing pro forma loss applicable to common stock.


This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-B, Item 601(b)(11) although, for the period
ended March 31, 1996, it is contrary to paragraph 40 of APB Opinion No. 15 because it produces
anti-dilutive results.

</TABLE>
United States Court of A ppeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 18, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-51430

_____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v. JAVIER MORALES-SANCHEZ Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(04-CR-1135)

--------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to remand the case to the Western District of Texas, El Paso Division for resentencing is granted.

______________ * Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative

request for an extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 14 days from the denial of Appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is moot.
### Interim Decision 44434

MATTER OF KRAUS PERIODICALS, INC. In Visa Petition Proceedings
NYC

-N
- 16048 

### Decided by Regional Commissioner November SO, 1964 Petition, by a Jobber of periodicals of scientific and scholarly nature in various languages, to accord beneficiary classification under section 101(a) (15) (H)Immigration and Nationality' Act, as an industrial trainee for a sixmonth period during which he will receive a salary of $100 per week, is denied dace the petition fails to set forth a training program, the specific position, duties, or skills in which beneficiary is to be trained, and thesubstantial salary beneficiary will receive suggests that productive employzuent, which may displace a United States citizen, will be involved. 

### . This matter comes before the Regional Commissioner as an appeal from the decision of the District Director denying the petitioner's request for classification of the beneficiary as a nonimmigrant 

### traineeunder section 101(a) (15) (H) (iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The petitioner, a jobber of • periodicals of scientific and scholarly nature in various languages, desires fn stertoril the beneficiary training 

### for a period of six months and . will pag him a salary of $100 per week plus time and one half for overtime. Section 214.2(h) (2) Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations, provides that such trainee status cannot be granted unless the required petition is accompanied by a statement describing the typeof training to be given and the position or duties for which the benefi-ary is to be trained. It further provides that such trainee may not engage in 

### productive employment if such employment will displace a United States resident. It is believed that this petition, even when supplemented by the brief submitted on appeal, fails to meet the requirement set forth above. No training program is set forth; the specific drills in which the beneficiary is to be trained are not described; the specific position or duties which the beneficiary will perform upon conclusion of the 63Interim Decision #1484 program is not designated; and the substantial salary which he will receive suggests that productive employment,

- which May displace aUnited States citizen, will be involved. It is concluded that the beneficiary is not properly classifiable as a nonimmigrant trainee and the appeal will therefore be dismissed. 

### It is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

64
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 858 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 858

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to extend coverage under 
  the whistleblower protection provisions of the District of Columbia 
Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 to personnel of the courts of 
                       the District of Columbia.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 858

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to extend coverage under 
  the whistleblower protection provisions of the District of Columbia 
Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 to personnel of the courts of 
                       the District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Court Employees 
Whistleblower Protection Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION FOR PERSONNEL OF THE COURTS OF THE 
              DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 17 of title 11, District 
of Columbia Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section:
``Sec. 11-1733. Whistleblower protection for court personnel
    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, section 1503 of the 
District of Columbia Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 (DC 
Code, sec. 1-616.3) shall apply to court personnel, except that court 
personnel may institute a civil action pursuant to subsection (c) of 
such section in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia or the 
United States District Court for the District of Columbia.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for subchapter II of 
chapter 17 of title 11, District of Columbia Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new item:

``11-1733. Whistleblower protection for court personnel.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect as if included 
in the enactment of title XI of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT PIERCE DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-14059-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATALIO VAZQUEZ-LOPEZ,

a/k/a “Jacinto Jose Alonzo,”

Defendant.

/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation entered by 

Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard Following Change of Plea Hearing [ECF No. 19]. On 

November 21, 2022, Magistrate Judge Maynard held a Change of Plea hearing [ECF No. 18] 

during which Defendant pled guilty to the sole count of the Indictment [ECF No. 9], the 

Government proffered a factual basis for the plea on the record. Defendant acknowledged that he 

understood the Government’s proffer and agreed that it was true and correct and accurately set 

forth the facts in his case as he understands them to be. Magistrate Judge Maynard thereafter 

issued a Report recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to the Indictment, 

that the Court find Defendant to have freely and voluntarily entered his guilty plea, and that the 

Court adjudicate him guilty of the Indictment [ECF No. 9]. No party has filed objections to the 

Report, and the time to do so has expired. 

The Court has conducted a review of the record and finds no error in the Report. Therefore, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 19] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

Case 2:22-cr-14059-AMC Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2022 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-14059-CR-CANNON

2. The guilty plea entered into by Defendant Natalio Vazquez-Lopez as to the sole count

of the Indictment is ACCEPTED.

3. Defendant Natalio Vazquez-Lopez is adjudicated guilty of the sole count of the

Indictment, which charges him with illegal reentry after removal, in violation of 8 

U.S.C. § 1326(a) [ECF No. 9]. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 12th day of December

2022.

________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 2:22-cr-14059-AMC Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2022 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

§ 1.1315 The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS); Comments. ( a ) The DEIS shall include: ( 1 ) A concise description of the proposal, the nature of the area affected, its uses, and any specific feature of the area that has special environmental significance;
( 2 ) An analysis of the proposal, and reasonable alternatives exploring the important consequent advantages and/or disadvantages of the action and indicating the direct and indirect effects and their significance in terms of the short and long-term uses of the human environment.
( b ) When a DEIS and supplements, if any, are prepared, the Commission shall file the Statement with the Office of Federal Activities, Environmental Protection Agency, consistent with its procedures. Public Notice of the availability of the DEIS will be published in the Federal Register by the Environmental Protection Agency.
( c ) When copies or summaries of the DEIS are sent to the Environmental Protection Agency, the copies or summaries will be electronically mailed with a request for comment to Federal agencies having jurisdiction by law or special expertise, to the Council on Environmental Quality, to the applicant, to individuals, groups and state and local agencies known to have an interest in the environmental consequences of a grant, and to any other person who has requested a copy. If an interested person lacks access to electronic mail and requests a hard copy or summary of the DEIS, it must be provided by mail.
( d ) Any person or agency may comment on the DEIS and the environmental effect of the proposal described therein within 45 days after notice of the availability of the statement is published in the Federal Register. A copy of those comments shall be electronically mailed to the applicant by the person who files them pursuant to § 1.47 and filed electronically with the Commission. If the interested person is unable to file electronically or mail the copy electronically, or if it would be unreasonably burdensome to do so, such person may submit the comments to the Commission and the applicant by mail, with a request for waiver under § 1.1304(b). If a person submitting comments is especially qualified in any way to comment on the environmental impact of the facilities, a statement of his or her qualifications shall be set out in the comments. In addition, comments submitted by an agency shall identify the person(s) who prepared them.
( e ) The applicant may electronically file reply comments within 15 days after the time for filing comments has expired. Reply comments shall be filed with the Commission and served by the applicant on persons or agencies which filed comments.
( f ) The preparation of a DEIS and the request for comments shall not open the application to attack on other grounds.
[51 FR 15000, Apr. 22, 1986, as amended at 85 FR 85531, Dec. 29, 2020]