alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Quited States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
—and—

Gnited States Court of
Federal Claims

ORDER
Restricting Court Access to the National Courts

Building Until August 14, 2020

Based on declared public health emergencies
impacting Washington, D.C. and the National Capital
Region and ongoing efforts to mitigate community
transmission and the impact of COVID-19, there isa need
for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit and the United States Court of Federal Claims to
restrict public access to the Howard T. Markey National
Courts Building. These restrictions modify and supersede
those outlined in the administrative orders of the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the
United States Court of Federal Claims both dated March
16, 2020, and will remain in place as a temporary measure
until August 14, 2020, unless modified by subsequent
order.

On behalf of both courts, we find pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2071(e) that there is an immediate need for this Order
altering the rules of both courts, effective June 29, 2020,
noon (Eastern).

It Is ORDERED THAT:

(1) Judges, special masters, law clerks, chambers staff,
court staff, interns, General Services
Administration personnel, and _ contractor

personnel regularly performing work in the
National Courts Building and connecting buildings coset iy

I MEREBY GERTIFY THIS DOCUMENT
ISA TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL ON FILE,

Administrative Order No. 20-04 MTOR MEEEDERALORGUT
PETER. MARKSTEWER CLERC OF COURT

with bin 0m sm 0


2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

(NCB), and law enforcement and security personnel
and contractors assigned to the NCB will be
admitted to the NCB upon the presentation of
appropriate identifying credentials.

(2) All others will be granted access to the NCB on a
case-by-case basis by the Chief Judge of whichever
court is appropriate under the circumstances, or her
designee.

(83) Requests for access must be submitted in writing,
ideally via email, no later than 24 hours in advance,
to the Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court of the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit or to the Clerk of Court of the United States
Court of Federal Claims, whichever court is
appropriate under the circumstances.

(4) These restrictions will remain in effect beginning
June 29, 2020, at noon (Eastern) and continue until
August 14, 2020, or until this Order is either
amended or rescinded.

(5) The Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court of the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit, and the Clerk of Court for the United States
Court of Federal Claims are directed to provide
public notice of this Order and to take any necessary
and proper actions to implement these restrictions.

FOR THE COURTS

June 26, 2020 /sfSharon Prost.

Date Sharon Prost
Chief Judge
United States Court of
Appeals for the
Federal Circuit

June 26, 2020 /s/ Margaret M. Sweeney
Date Margaret M. Sweeney

Chief Judge
United States Court of
Federal Claims
No. 10-1351.

#### Keyes et al. *v.*Bowen, Secretary of State of California, et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
S89A0320, S89X0477.

#### HORTON v. KITCHENS et al.; and vice versa.

(383 SE2d 871)

Smith, Justice.

The appellant, Frances Kitchens Horton, was a third-party defendant in the divorce action between her son Bert Kitchens and his wife Sandra Kitchens. Mrs. Kitchens alleged that Mr. Kitchens had fraudulently conveyed certain property to the appellant in order to defeat Mrs. Kitchens’ claim for alimony. The jury found that the conveyance from Mr. Kitchens to the appellant was fraudulent and should be set aside. Paragraph Six of the final judgment and decree in the divorce action cancelled the deed between Mr. Kitchens and the appellant.

1. The appellant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground that there was insufficient evidence for the deed to be set aside.

A review of the record indicates that it is not devoid of evidence supporting the jury’s verdict; therefore, we will not disturb it on appeal. *Nebb v. Butler,*257 Ga 145 (357 SE2d 257) (1987).

2. This case has been decided on its merits; however, in view of the fact that the appellee has filed a motion to dismiss for failure to file a discretionary application, we will address the appellee’s motion to dismiss. This case involving a third-party defendant is a case of first impression; therefore, we take this opportunity to review the issue of when an application is required in a domestic relations case. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2) states that an application is required in:

> Appeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, child custody, and other domestic relations cases including, but not limited to, granting or refusing a divorce or temporary or permanent alimony, awarding or refusing to change child custody, or holding or declining to hold persons in contempt of such alimony or child custody judgment or orders. . . .

An application is required to appeal a domestic relations case in which a “judgment or order” has been entered. *Any*party who seeks to appeal a “judgment” or an “order” entered in a domestic relations case must follow the procedure set out in OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2).

3. We need not address the cross-appeal in case No. S89X0477, as it has been rendered moot by our holding above.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*447Decided September 28, 1989.

*Mills, Freeman, Vaughn & Sosebee, W. Franklin Freeman, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Joseph M. Todd, Howard P. Wallace,*for appellees.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4455-C-04] 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, HUD. 

# ACTION:

Notice; technical corrections. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice corrects an incorrect date that appeared in the notice published on May 22, 2000. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 30, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Gerald J. Benoit, Director, Real Estate                               ( print page 40687)                            and Housing Performance Division, Office of Public and Assisted Housing Delivery, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 4210, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410-8000; telephone number (202) 708-0477 (this is not a toll-free telephone number). Hearing or speech impaired individuals may access this number via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This notice corrects an incorrect date that appeared in the notice published on May 22, 2000 (65 FR 32116). The primary purpose of the May 22, 2000 notice was to transmit changes to the monthly Administrative Fee Amounts of certain areas listed in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice published on February 25, 2000 (65 FR 10316). These changes were necessary to correct a computer programming error that caused a small reduction in the fees for certain areas listed in the February 25, 2000 notice.                 

The May 22, 2000 notice, however, also contained an error. This notice referred to the “merger date” of the Housing Choice Voucher Program as October 1, 1998 (see 65 FR 32116, third column). The merger date is October 1, 1999. Through publication of this notice, HUD acknowledges this error and advises that the correct “merger date” is October 1, 1999. 

Dated: June 23, 2000. 

Gloria Cousar, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Assisted Housing Delivery. 

[FR Doc. 00-16529 Filed 6-29-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210-33-P
<PAGE>   1

                         GLOBE BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC.
                            EXHIBIT 99 - SAFE HARBOR

         The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe
harbor from civil litigation in many instances for forward-looking statements.
In order to take advantage of the Act, such statements must be accompanied by
meaningful cautionary statements that identify important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those that might be projected.
This exhibit to the Registrant's Form 10-K is being filed in order to allow the
Registrant to take advantage of the new provisions of this Act by providing the
following cautionary statements:

RISK FACTORS AFFECTING GLOBE
----------------------------

         Globe's business operations and strategy are subject to a number of
uncertainties and risks which could adversely affect its performance in the
future. Among these are the following factors:

         Globe's principal growth strategy depends on the acquisition of other
companies in the rent-to-rent and corporate housing businesses. Although
previous acquisitions have been successful to date, there can be no assurance
that any additional acquisitions will be consummated or that, if acquisitions
are consummated, they will be successful. Acquisitions require a significant
commitment of corporate resources, management attention and capital which, in
certain cases, could exceed that available to Globe.

         Many of Globe's competitors have greater financial and other resources
than Globe. These resources could give them an advantage in price and service
areas.

         Several of Globe's rental customers compete with Globe in its corporate
housing business. As Globe expands in the corporate housing area, it may
continue to lose rental business from those competitors.

         The Company believes that the industry it serves is significantly
influenced by economic conditions generally and by levels of job creation,
relocations of employees and general business activity. A prolonged economic
downturn could have a material adverse affect on Globe's operations.


                                       E-6
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

O R D E R

Modifying Procedures for Nonelectronic Filing

Due to conditions in the vicinity of the National Courts 

Building in Washington, D.C. that may impact pedestrian 

and vehicular access for in-person, courier, or third-party 

commercial carriers, and there being an immediate need 

for this Order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2071(e), effective 

12:01 a.m. (Eastern) on November 3, 2020, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Clerk’s Office is directed to suspend access to 

its night drop box on H Street, N.W.

(2) The Clerk’s Office is directed to suspend the receipt 

of paper filings and submissions in-person by 

couriers, third-party commercial carriers, and 

members of the public.

(3) Until further notice from the Clerk of Court, 

parties and filers must submit any paper filings or 

submissions through the U.S. Postal Service to 

Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for 

the Federal Circuit, 717 Madison Place, N.W., 

Washington, DC 20439.

(4) Until further notice, the Clerk’s Office remains 

accessible for purposes of Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 26 and Federal Circuit Rule 26 and the 

Clerk’s Office is to continue to provide all other 

services. Electronic filing access and deadlines, as 

well as any scheduled hearings, are unaffected by 

this Order.

(5) Parties and filers are advised that any paper filings 

or submissions that may be untimely as a result of 

this change in procedure may file a motion for leave 

to file out of time explaining that the paper filing 

CERTIFIED COPY

I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS DOCUMENT IS A 

TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE 

ORIGINAL ON FILE. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

PETER R. MARKSTEINER, CLERK OF COURT By Deputy Clerk: Date: Jarrett B. Perlow November 2, 2020
2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

or submission could not be filed on time due to the 

inaccessibility of the night drop box.

(6) Parties and filers are further advised that the court 

cannot waive the deadlines for filing either a notice 

of appeal or petition for review, even if the 

document was deposited in the mail in a timely 

fashion.

(7) Unrepresented filers should review the court’s 

website for information about the availability of 

electronic filing, including digital submission of 

new petitions for review, notices of appeal, or other 

case-initiating filings.

FOR THE COURT

 Nov. 2, 2020 /s/ Sharon Prost 

Date Sharon Prost

 Chief Judge
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

VASILIOS D. KIRITSIS AND JENNIFER L.

KIRITSIS,

Petitioners

v.

YOCUM INSTITUTE FOR ARTS

EDUCATION, INC.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 360 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of December, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### § 955.30 Motion for reconsideration.

A motion for reconsideration, if filed by either party, shall set forth specifically the ground or grounds relied upon to sustain the motion, and shall be filed within 30 days from the date of the receipt of a copy of the decision of the Board by the party filing the motion.
Administrative Order No. 2022-04

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit —and—

United States Court of 

Federal Claims

O R D E R

Reopening the National Courts Building

Based on recent changes to public health guidance and 

conditions within Washington, D.C. and the National 

Capital Region, the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit and the United States Court of Federal 

Claims find that there is no longer a need to restrict public 

access to the Howard T. Markey National Courts Building.

On behalf of both courts, we find pursuant to 28 

U.S.C.§ 2071(e) that there is an immediate need for this 

Order altering the rules of both courts, effective September 

12, 2022, 12:01 a.m. (Eastern).

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Administrative Order No. 2022-03 (Jan. 18, 2022) 

is rescinded effective September 12, 2022, 12:01 

a.m. (Eastern), at which point the National Courts 

Building shall resume normal operations

concerning public access.

(2) The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal 

Circuit and the United States Court of Federal 

Claims may continue to implement health and 

safety protocols, procedures, practices, or policies 

to minimize the possibility of viral transmission, as 

reflected in posted signs or placards, and/or 

information posted on the courts’ public websites.

(3) All individuals entering the National Courts 

Building shall be required to comply with any 
2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

protocols, procedures, practices, or policies 

implemented pursuant to this Order.

(5) All visitors, regardless of their vaccination status, 

must wear masks in all public areas of the National 

Courts Building and connecting buildings. Only N95, KN-95, or KF-94 masks are acceptable masks 

in the National Courts Building

(6) Court staff and security personnel are authorized 

to restrict the entry of or to direct the removal of 

any individuals who are not in compliance with

posted regulations issued pursuant to this Order.

(7) The Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court of the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal 

Circuit, and the Clerk of Court for the United 

States Court of Federal Claims are directed to 

provide public notice of this Order and to take any 

necessary and proper actions to implement these 

restrictions.

FOR THE COURTS

September 9, 2022 /s/ Kimberly A. Moore 

 Date Kimberly A. Moore

 Chief Judge

United States Court of

Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit

September 9, 2022 /s/ Elaine D. Kaplan y

 Date Elaine D. Kaplan

 Chief Judge

United States Court of 

Federal Claims
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  quarter  ended  March 31,  2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Lawrence A. Sala,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lawrence A. Sala
--------------------
Lawrence A. Sala
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 9, 2006

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren,  Inc. and will be retained by Anaren,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       35
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  quarter  ended  March 31,  2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Joseph E. Porcello,
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Joseph E. Porcello
----------------------
Joseph E. Porcello
Sr. Vice President of Finance, Treasurer

Date: May 9, 2006

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren,  Inc. and will be retained by Anaren,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       36
#### § 101.137 Interconnection of private operational fixed point-to-point microwave stations.

Private operational fixed point-to-point microwave stations may be interconnected with facilities of common carriers subject to applicable tariffs.
EXHIBIT 15

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-33094, 333-65968, 333-97249, 333-103768, 333-107727, 333-149828, 333-155527, 333-170716, 333-175852 and 333-184558) and form F-3 (No. 333-182769) of National Grid plc of
our report dated May 15, 2013 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    
|London, UK                    
|June 10, 2013
** **

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant toSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned, the Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer ofAmerican Science & Engineering, Inc. (the “Company”), does herebycertify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

1.                 theCompany’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (“10-Q”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 theinformation contained in the Company’s 10-Q being filed fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.
| Date: August 9, 2006 | /s/ Kenneth J. Galaznik          |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                      | Kenneth J. Galaznik                   |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to American Science &Engineering, Inc. and will be retained by American Science &Engineering, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----
**Exhibit 31(e)**

 

**EXELON CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Christopher M. Crane, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Constellation Energy Group, Inc.; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date:    April 27,   2012 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/   CHRISTOPHER M. CRANE                         |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer            |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350

CERTIFICATION



The undersigned officer hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of COMFORCE Corporation for the quarter ended June 27, 2004 as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE Corporation.



Signed August 10, 2004.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ John C. Fanning                 
|John C. Fanning,                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer