alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# AVS



# Quality Management System QPM# AIR·ANM-030-F7 Revision 1
Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58 I Date: December 17, 2008 

# Record ofCdntacts FDMS Docket No. FAA-lllMlJ,Div- 

# Ob7J.- With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed 

# I(e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization , Date PersjJD Contacted ATA Mr. Mark Lop~z 

### 02112/2010 Boeing Mr. Bill Kumtnert 

### 02/0312010 , I

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHFN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List to Verify That This is je Correct Revision Before Use
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2005-22523

Directorate Identifier: 2005NM058AD

767-27-0204, R1 --- 2/12/09

767-27-0205, R1 --- 2/12/09

767-27A0224 --- 6/23/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anacomp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Jeffrey R. Cramer,
Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002 ("Section 906"), that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);
          and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated:  May 13, 2004


                                                     /s/Jeffrey R. Cramer
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Jeffrey R. Cramer
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Anacomp, Inc. and will be retained
by Anacomp,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.2201 Purpose.

The provisions of §§ 1.2200 through 1.2209 implement section 6403 of the Spectrum Act, which requires the Commission to conduct a reverse auction to determine the amount of compensation that each broadcast television licensee would accept in return for voluntarily relinquishing some or all of its broadcast television spectrum usage rights in order to make spectrum available for assignment through a system of competitive bidding under subparagraph (G) of section 309(j)(8) of the Communications Act of 1934, as added by section 6402 of the Spectrum Act.
No. 10-11240.

#### Arias-Ceja *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
1 ... S ee Te x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRIC TOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 09 - 26 8- CV I N R E R ONAL D J . HOL L E M AN R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NALP R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u r t h a s c o n s id e r e d re la t o r ’s p e t it io n f o rw r it o f m a n d a m u s a n d is of t he opi ni on t hatr el i efs houl d be de ni ed. Accor di ngl y, r el at or ’ s pe t i t i on f or w r i t of m and am us i s den i ed.

P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: GA RD N ER, W A LKER, an d M EI ER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: Aug us t 21, 2009
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE

 

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, the President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of American Science & Engineering, Inc. (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1.             theCompany’s Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (“10-Q/A”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.             theinformation contained in the Company’s 10-Q/A being filed fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 

Date: February 15, 2005 

 

 
|   | /s/ Anthony R. Fabiano                 |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Anthony R. Fabiano                     |   |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to American Science &Engineering, Inc. and will be retained by American Science &Engineering, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
§ 0.391 Authority delegated. The Director, Office of Workplace Diversity, or his/her designee, is hereby delegated authority to: ( a ) Manage the Commission's internal EEO compliance program pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, the Equal Pay Act, and other applicable laws, rules, regulations, and Executive Orders, with authority that includes appointing EEO counselors, investigators, and mediators; investigating complaints of employment discrimination, and recommending to the Chairperson final agency decisions on EEO complaints;
( b ) Mediate EEO complaints;
( c ) Develop the Commission's affirmative action goals and objectives;
( d ) Collect and analyze data on the Commission's affirmative action and EEO activities and accomplishments;
( e ) Prepare and release reports on EEO, affirmative action, workplace diversity, and related subjects;
( f ) Review personnel activities, including hiring, promotions, discipline, training, awards, and performance recognition for conformance with EEO and workplace diversity goals, objectives and requirements;
( g ) Conduct studies and collect data on workplace diversity issues and problems;
( h ) Assume representational role on behalf of the Commission at conferences, meetings, and negotiations on EEO and workplace diversity issues;
( i ) Develop programs and strategies designed to foster and encourage fairness, equality, and inclusion of all employees in the workforce.
[61 FR 2728, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 88 FR 21431, Apr. 10, 2023]
#### § 302-12.111 May we require an employee to use a real estate broker specified by the RSC?

Yes, you may require, through your contract with the RSC, that every employee enrolled in the homesale program use a real estate broker specified by the RSC. This provision is not part of the standard terms for a homesale program, but it may provide a pricing advantage in negotiations with potential RSC, as well as an opportunity for better management of the homesale process.

[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18344, Apr. 1, 2011]
llLti2id£Jl££J%&£L FILED IN

OFAPPEALS 75U/ mus^ Z /Mr-ssy? r-W"TMm

APR 13 2015

*• Off. —-.- « . .,,.,_ ...A,:...,,,, ... . PRINE

^Vy - ~ i CLERK

jfr j& X - /../.:..si..-^- ------

SlhMfeZu^''*+£_/y/e/^y^f'M^j^z^

/ /J / / ;" -^ /,.^ y

/A- /y(/3ru6f/hy%i±) f^'CrX '&*&/•(e4£fr&

IvJhJA/AA^ tpwei Jl&MM^^ji/£€:^£^Ji^M,i

%:/-c:h/S!,> -itd^6h 'X d\dAJot file, /?/{% yf^rM-'

---? ?

/• ?//*c/; UJ^cle/ 2 a^f ///-> JT>#^^^

^ fe^/c /« /W/ /IS;7^te'^#f/§/-#&/„.

fiU^MS m:&dc^,..< ^LhM^ /t^i; 4t4^r x?^/

J~7

,.j ~-\ *
Tis- /Cm/
a aaaa AA_ ey.thAy. /~r?mi pwsi s^aAA^'ccl, y

/yfOytejT'/My yyyr yy AuJJAItSjiOyj,. su/JMtsj<°*j. ^rft;yxjf' iA)Ai,o:jf 4/26uy^oyf M&j^prjf /.<„•

/vu ify. .^ - i /A/vyf Aff): J AnyAI /AAAJ

L.&WP AAy JAACA ,y( J Tfrf^nc-U s?f /'A?yy~

.j'i „ . yA/•',•,/•/,Ac r\ • ;y,~ /A ,w~-~.y.... yj y ^ /,

<>A LJ(Ay.y

Ay AeytAb yv /Ayj^yrAAo. yu&yyAfij'/(L*##f

riA<yyMyy y ^Ay ylsyy #», A^yyyt-

~i^--ALyyyAy2viL /9cm^s ~t /-?•• /f$y:o/vyye/y^ f<^ &A

A^y/iAfwre, A6priAisf~ Awta-rAsA /•)y•//*.yA,,Ay

¥OAA<y€A&iAA<y, /-y A"

/ U >/ /A" // i ,. yy ft i^- yyfi '<yyA\ f

Gy HetJuZSf fofi /%Ate/ isfMJeyt /{lie, Y& My/6yLAiA j

y-„. •"). -j,.,/

i^ /

'^#"7 / '-: -'

A y ! —

./ -fj. / y

y

!0- Adftoy AAvyy*
a a A A , / y f-. « A) I d r~-

LeyAi j u-ify yf j£AU(C<y M±k (• )

M^MJmOjua^ AS /r€^>^/^/0^frAf"

xAAchl^-fiyy /^y'/rti^. a>f ftLJh,£JiSe^JJJACCi-/-?yy

£>A6tAAA'f AhvJ <&/f<& yf /&AAy^/$ /J J£Jj^l 3^A/j0J^h

J^ihLJli^ £j,£^l±^fAkM , &lc>.5S.lfr) , /tjy \£u±AJfeL> ^JjuJ^JiM. AyyJ £aLa JR.yAcui fog

y£y}j.A Cfy /aJ 1aJ^^£M.^MJLJ^Jc1 A2yJ fj&l^/, A'CA

f - ^ 'fyi>ij> £/< v. />1 *M//f<AkcJSo -7/

/y/^5f A&JUr<srtL. S/^L^rl^o-.
11/3/2014

GEORGE,

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS OFTEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 787J,U„

©FFDG8AL

STATE OF TEXAS

PENALTY FOR

PR8VATE U

SHERWOOD LYNN *-

4T

02 1R

0006557458 NOV04 2014

- .„-TM v, MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 78701

Tr. Ct^No. W09t54599-T(B) WR-75,961-07 On this day, the application for^1l:07 Writ.of*Ha'beas Corpus has been received and presented to the Court.. ^ ^;^J3|^

*u~z>" " Abel Acosta, Clerk

SHERWOOD LYNN GEORGE

RETURN TO SEND!

NOT IN DALLAS COUNTY
Exhibit 7.1



Calculation of dividends/interest on capital per share data.



|                                       |  |                                    |  |             |  |             |  |             |  |            
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | ----------- |  | ----------- |  | -----------
|                                       |  | At for the year ended December 31,
|                                       |  | 1999                               |  | 2000        |  | 2001        |  | 2002        |  | 2003       
|Number of shares                       |  | 113,152,446                        |  | 113,152,446 |  | 113,152,446 |  | 113,152,446 |  | 113,152,446
|Dividends paid (in thousands of U.S.$) |  | 47,105                             |  | 193,353     |  | 67,610      |  | 71,702      |  | 133,906    
|Dividends per share                    |  | 0.42                               |  | 1.71        |  | 0.60        |  | 0.63        |  | 1.18
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 11

- 15 123 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4: 09

- c v - 00 932

- CLS

- HGD ETHAN EUGENE DORSEY, JR.
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,

versus CHARLES BAILEY, in his individual capacity and official capacity,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant

- Appellee

.

_______________________ _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________ (March 7, 2013)
Before MARCUS , PRYOR and KRAVITCH , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 11-15123 Date Filed: 03/07/2013 Page: 1 of 32 Ethan Dorsey, Jr., an Alabama prisoner, appeals pro se the summary judgment against his complaint that Charles Bailey, a shift commander at the St. Clair Correctional Facility, acted with deliberate indifference to a substantial risk
of serious physical harm to Dorsey in violation of the Eighth Amendment

. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dorsey sued Bailey to recover for injuries that Dorsey suffered during a fight with his cellmate, Jerome Terry, whom Dorsey had requested that Bailey relocate to another prison cell. We affirm. The district court did not err when it entered summary judg ment in favor of Bailey. Dorsey failed to establish that Bailey was subjectively aware that Dorsey
faced a substantial risk of serious physical harm from Terry. See Carter v. Galloway , 352 F.3d 1346, 1349 (11th Cir. 2003). Bailey ’s affidavit established
that , despite an earlier “disagreement” between the prisoners, he did not believe Terry posed any risk of harm to Dorsey because the inmate

- control system officer who assigned Terry to Dorsey’s cell had determined that the two men were not “validated enem [ies]

. ” And the inmates had lived peaceably since their disagreement . Dorsey averred that he and Terry had resid ed in the same cell block “for months without incident” and they visited Bailey together to report the “potential danger” in housing them together

. A lthough Dorsey reported that he did
not “feel comfortable” living w ith Terry, Dorsey did not state that he had been
threatened by or feared Terry. Dorsey also agreed to “try to chill” after Bailey said

Case: 11-15123 Date Filed: 03/07/2013 Page: 2 of 33 that he would address the housing situati on in a couple of days . Affidavits prepared by other inmates established that Bailey knew Terry had been a “troublemaker , ” had “past conflicts” with Dorsey, and had been removed from the
cell block the previous week for sexual misconduct, but failed to prove that Bailey could have known that T erry would hurt Dorsey. Bailey “ arguably should have

. . . [separated Dorsey and Terry,] but [a] ‘ merely negligent failure to protect an inmate from attack does not justify liability under section 1983.

. . . ’ ” Id

. at 1350 (quoting Brown v. Hughes , 894 F.2d 1533, 1537 (11th Cir. 1990) )

. We AFFIRM the summary judgment in favor of Bailey. Case: 11-15123 Date Filed: 03/07/2013 Page: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 25
                              POWER OF ATTORNEY


        The undersigned hereby designates, constitutes and appoints Robert G.
Jackson, President, and Russell P. Flynn, Treasurer, and each of them, the
true and lawful attorney for the undersigned, with full power of
substitution, to sign for and on behalf of the undersigned an annual report
on Form 10-K of Metropolitan Realty Company, L.L.C. with respect to the
fiscal year ending December 31, 1996, all amendments thereto, and all
instruments necessary or incidental in connection therewith, and to file the
same with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of said attorneys
shall have full power and authority to do and perform in the name and on
behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act whatever
requisite or necessary to be done in the premises as fully, and for all
intents and purposes, as the undersigned might or could do in person, the
undersigned hereby ratifying and approving the acts of said attorneys and
each of them.

/s/ Robert H. Naftaly        Dated: February 10, 1997
/s/ Thomas Zdrodowski               Dated: March 24, 1997
/s/ Richard C. Webb          Dated: February 6, 1997
/s/ Russell P. Flynn                Dated: February 12, 1997
/s/ Kenneth L. Hollowell            Dated: February 24, 1997
/s/ Ernest Lofton                   Dated: February 6, 1997
/s/ Robert G. Jackson        Dated: February 25, 1997
/s/ Wayne S. Doran                  Dated: February 24, 1997
/s/ Joel A. Schwartz                Dated: February 7, 1997
/s/ Daniel L. Boone                 Dated: February 6, 1997
/s/ Jeffrey A. Heldt                Dated: February 10, 1997
/s/ David B. Handon          Dated: February 8, 1997
/s/ R. Douglas Trezise              Dated: February 10, 1997
/s/ Harold Smith                    Dated: February 19, 1997
/s/ Nicholas H. Degel               Dated: February 7, 1997
/s/ David M. Diegel                 Dated: February 14, 1997
/s/ Ronald Yee                      Dated: February 7, 1997
/s/ Douglas E. Ebert                Dated: February 10, 1997
/s/ Mark R. Bartlett                Dated: February 10, 1997
/s/ Robert J. Lee                   Dated: February 16, 1997
/s/ Richard P. Kughn         Dated: February 16, 1997
/s/ Frank P. Stella                 Dated: February 10, 1997
/s/ F. Thomas Lewand                Dated: March 20, 1997

                                 E-2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-21230 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LEROY STRONG, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-524-1

-------------------- October 29, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Leroy Strong appeals his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Strong argues that his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) must be reversed because it is unconstitutional to convict a defendant under that statute when the firearm’s only connection with interstate commerce was that at some point in the past it crossed state lines. Relying on Jones v. United States , 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000), and UnitedNo. 01-21230 -2- States v. Lopez , 514 U.S. 549 (1995), Strong argues that this court’s current interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) violates the Commerce Clause because such an interpretation would apply to 95% of the firearms in this country. This court has repeatedly rejected constitutional challenges to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) convictions based on Lopez and Jones , concluding that the interstate commerce element is satisfied by the possession of a firearm that was manufactured in a different state or country. See United States v. Cavazos , 288 F.3d 706, 712 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied , (U.S. Oct. 7, 2002) (No. 02- 5348); see also United States v. Daugherty , 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 1150 (2002). Thus, Strong’s argument fails. The conviction is AFFIRMED.
378P15

#### State v. Eric Cornell Wilson

Def’s *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-234)

Denied
328P15

#### In the Matter of The Estate of Charles W. Pickelsimer, Jr.

Caveators’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1192)

Denied
No. 11M104.

No. 11M108.

#### Gaskins *v.*Eli Lilly & Co.; and Vlastelica, Individually and as Next Friend of Chehaiber *v.*Brend et al.

Motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time denied.
From: gthomas@bp.Guardian.com

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: Re: US EPA - ICR Response

Date: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:58:10 PM

Ms. Hancy, in addition to the ICR data you are referencing, we also

provided Susan Fairchild with detailed drawings of each Guardian furnace

with a table on each drawing showing the chemical composition of all the

refractory components including Cr2O3.

So, I am confirming with this email that the chromium percentages refers to

Cr2O3.

Kind regards,

Grover Thomas

 

 From: "Hancy, Cindy Wang"

<chancy@rti.org> 

 

 To: 

<gthomas@bp.Guardian.com> 

 

 Date: 07/13/2012 12:39

PM 

 

 Subject: US EPA - ICR

Response 

 

Mr. Thomas,

I’m with RTI and I am assisting Susan Fairchild with the Wool Fiberglass

NESHAP. I was reviewing Guardian’s confidential responses to the last ICR

and I wanted to confirm that the chromium percentages listed for the

different sections of the furnaces refer to percentages of Cr2O3. Most

facilities responded with “% Cr2O3”, but Guardian just listed a percentage

with no other detail. Could you please confirm this?

Thanks,

Cindy Wang Hancy

RTI International

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-6623

Fax: (919) 316-3420
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4246 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4246

 To authorize expenditures for fiscal year 1995 for the operation and 
        maintenance of the Panama Canal, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 1994

Mr. Tauzin (for himself and Mr. Studds) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize expenditures for fiscal year 1995 for the operation and 
        maintenance of the Panama Canal, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Panama Canal Commission 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1995''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF EXPENDITURES.

    (a) Operation, Maintenance, and Improvement.--Except as specified 
in subsection (b), the Panama Canal Commission is authorized to make 
such expenditures within the limits of funds and borrowing authority 
available to it in accordance with law, and to make such contracts and 
commitments, without regard to fiscal year limitations, and to be 
derived from the Panama Canal Revolving Fund, as may be necessary under 
the Panama Canal Act of 1979 (22 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), for the 
operation, maintenance, and improvement of the Panama Canal for fiscal 
year 1995.
    (b) Administrative Expenses.--For fiscal year 1995, the Panama 
Canal Commission is authorized to make expenditures from the Panama 
Canal Revolving Fund for administrative expenses, not to exceed 
$50,030,000, including--
            (1) not to exceed $11,000 for official reception and 
        representation expenses of the Board of the Commission;
            (2) not to exceed $5,000 for official reception and 
        representation expenses of the Secretary of Defense; and
            (3) not to exceed $30,000 for official reception and 
        representation expenses of the Administrator of the Commission.
    (c) Motor Vehicles.--Funds available to the Panama Canal Commission 
shall be available for the purchase of not to exceed 43 passenger motor 
vehicles for replacement only (including large heavy-duty vehicles used 
to transport Commission personnel across the Isthmus of Panama), the 
purchase price of which shall not exceed $19,500 per vehicle.

SEC. 3. SCHOOL REIMBURSEMENT.

    Section 1321(e)(2) of the Panama Canal Act of 1979 (22 U.S.C. 
3731(e)(2)) is amended by inserting after ``schools in the Republic of 
Panama'' the following: ``or in the United States''.

                                 <all>
```
#### § 302-12.106 What rules must we follow when contracting for a comprehensive homesale program?

You must follow the rules contained in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) (48 CFR) and/or all other acquisition regulations applicable to your agency.

[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18343, Apr. 1, 2011]
No. 11-9613.

#### Marquez-Murillo *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13 - 22 - 00476 - CR ROY GUZMAN JR. AKA ROY JUNIOR GUZMAN v. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 454th Judicial District Court of Medina County, Texas Tr ial Cou rt Cause No. 17- 08 -12518- CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 22, 2023
361P15

#### Ardeal Roseboro v. John Roseboro, The Roseboro Law Firm, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, City of Winston-Salem, Winston-Salem Police Department, Barry D. Roundtree, and M.L. Bowens

Pit’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Decision of COA (COAP15-704)

Denied