alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0028 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM228AD
737 - 28A1212 IN 01 --- 10/7/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### § 302-3.423 If I separate from Government service upon completion of my TCS, what relocation expenses will my agency pay upon my separation?

If you separate from Government service upon completion of your TCS, your agency will upon your separation, pay the same relocation expenses it would have paid had you not separated from Government service upon completion of your TCS.
April 8, 1996
Mr. John F. X. Mannion
7664 Hunt Lane
Fayetteville, NY 13066
Dear Jack:
I want to take this opportunity to outline the provisions of your Directors'
Retirement Plan and payments to be made to you:
     1.   Financial Benefit Group, Inc. will pay to you $529.86 each month
for a period of 
          one hundred and fifty-seven (157) months commencing June 1, 1996.
     2.   In the event of your death, the monthly payments shall continue
for twelve months 
          after your death and shall be payable to your spouse. In no event
shall these 
          payments extend beyond the one hundred and fifty-seven month
period discussed 
          above.
     3.   If you prefer, these monthly payments can be directly deposited in
the bank of your 
          choice. If you choose this option, please furnish me with the bank
name, account 
          name and account number. Otherwise, we will forward the check
directly to you at 
          the above address.
Please confirm your understanding of the above by signing the enclosed copy of
this letter and returning it to me.
If you have any questions regarding this, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
     Acknowledged by:
     /s/ John F.X. Mannion
     John F.X. Mannion
84
No. 11-9320.

#### Aguirre *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Ask the publishers to restore access to 500,000+ books.

Donate iconAn illustration of a heart shape"Donate to the archive"Upload iconAn illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing arrow.Upload
Sign up
Log in

web pages

#### Mobile Apps

                      Wayback Machine (iOS)
                      Wayback Machine (Android)
                      Chrome
                      Firefox
                      Safari
                      Edge
                      Explore the Collections
                      Learn More
                      Build Collections
                      About
                      Blog
                      Projects
                      Help
                      Donate
                      Contact
                      Jobs
                      Volunteer
                      People
                      Sign up for free        Log in        metadata        text contents        TV news captions        radio transcripts        archived web sites        AboutBlogProjectsHelpDonateDonate iconAn illustration of a heart shapeContactJobsVolunteerPeople
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 248 (Thursday, December 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 78330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30774]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Hampshire Advisory 
Committee

    Date and Time: Friday, January 10, 2014, 4:30 p.m. [EST].
    Place: Via Teleconference. Public Dial-in 1-877-446-3914; Listen 
Line Code: 35378877.
    TDD: Dial Federal Relay Service 1-800-977-8339 give operator the 
following number: 202-376-7533--or by email at bdelaviez@usccr.gov.
    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the New Hampshire Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene via 
conference call. The purpose of the meeting is project planning to 
discuss its upcoming briefing meeting on voting rights issues in the 
Granite state.
    The meeting will be conducted via conference call. Members of the 
public who call-in can expect to incur charges for calls they initiate 
over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund any incurred 
charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over 
land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Monday, February 
10, 2014. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, 
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to Barbara 
Delaviez at dbelaviez@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional 
information may contact the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated on: December 19, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2013-30774 Filed 12-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
#### § 128-1.8003 Objective.

The Department shall comply with Executive Order 12699 for the purpose of reducing the risks to lives of occupants of new buildings owned by the Department, leased for Department uses, or purchased and constructed with assistance from the Department, and to other persons who would be affected by the failure of such buildings in earthquakes; improving the capability of essential new Department buildings to function during or after an earthquake; and protecting public investments in all covered buildings; all in a cost-effective manner.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1182 Schedule of fees for products and services provided by the Commission in connection with competitive bidding procedures.

| Product or service | Fee amount | Payment procedure |
| --- | --- | --- |
| On-line remote access 900 Number Telephone Service) | 2.30 per minute | Charges included on customer's long distance telephone bill. |
| Remote Bidding Software | $175.00 per package | Payment to auction contractor by credit card or check. (Public Notice will specify exact payment procedures.) |
| Bidder Information Package | First package free; $16.00 per additional package (including postage) to same person or entity | Payment to auction contractor by credit card or check. (Public Notice will specify exact payment procedures.) |

[60 FR 38280, July 26, 1995]
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4251

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to transfer certain excess equipment

to educational institutions and training schools.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 19, 1994

Mr. KLINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Armed Services

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to transfer certain

excess equipment to educational institutions and training

schools.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER CERTAIN EXCESS

4 PROPERTY TO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

5 AND TRAINING SCHOOLS.

6 Paragraph (1) of section 2535(b) of title 10, United

7 States Code, is amended—

8 (1) in subparagraph (F), by striking out ‘‘and’’;

9 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (G) as sub10 paragraph (H); and
2

•HR 4251 IH

1 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (F) the fol2 lowing new subparagraph (G):

3 ‘‘(G) notwithstanding title II of the Federal

4 Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949

5 (40 U.S.C. 481 et seq.) and any other provision of

6 law, authorize the transfer, on a nonreimbursable

7 basis, of any such property to any nonprofit edu8 cational institution or training school whenever the

9 program proposed by such institution or school for

10 the use of such property will contribute materially to

11 national defense; and’’.

Æ
# Comments on: 18-1209: DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, LLC v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential
EXHIBIT 32.0







SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Andrea Electronics Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





| |                     |  |                                                                                                    
| | ------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Date:  May 13, 2011 |  | /s/ DOUGLAS J. ANDREA                                                                              
| |                     |  | Douglas J. Andrea
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Secretary
| |                     |  |                                                                                                    
| |                     |  | /s/ CORISA L. GUIFFRE                                                                              
| |                     |  | Corisa L. Guiffre
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary        







---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 7, 2010

p0331 

# Order

April 7, 2010

140032

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140032 COA: 293625 Oakland CC: 2008-219450-FH TONY SELLERS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 60-2.33 Preemption.

To the extent that any state or local laws, regulations or ordinances, including those that grant special benefits to persons on account of sex, are in conflict with Executive Order 11246, as amended, or with the requirements of this part, they will be regarded as preempted under the Executive Order.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03955.A3

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
§ 302-15.3 Am I eligible for payment for property management services under this part? Yes, you are eligible for payment for property management services when: ( a ) You transfer in the interest of the Government; and
( b ) You and/or a member(s) of your immediate family hold(s) title to a residence which you are eligible to sell at Government expense under part 302-11 or part 302-12 of this chapter.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Cape Henry to Pamlico Sound,including Albemarle Sound, Virginia--North Carolina [electronic resource]**
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.418/7:12205/

Item Number:0191-B-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000878593
 
Zip files by year: 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1979| 1980 | 1981 | 1982| 1983
 
April 20, 2020
#### § 0.468 Interest.

Interest shall be charged those requesters who fail to pay the fees charged. The agency will begin assessing interest charges on the amount billed starting on the 31st day following the day on which the billing was sent. The date on which the payment is received by the agency will determine whether and how much interest is due. The interest shall be set at the rate prescribed in 31 U.S.C. 3717.
# Comments on: 23-1281: ALCON INC. v. AMO DEVELOPMENT, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**MOSSIMO, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Edwin Lewis, Vice Chairman and Co-ChiefExecutive Officer of the registrant, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K of Mossimo, Inc.;

2.                 Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report.

3.                 Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to usby others, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrols over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

(b)          Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| /s/ EDWIN LEWIS                                 |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edwin Lewis                                     |
| *Vice-Chairman and  Co-Chief Executive Officer* |
| March 31, 2005                             |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2137

MICHAEL ADEMOLA ADEPOJU, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, 

 Respondent. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: June 17, 2009 Decided: June 30, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, 

Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney 

General, Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, Aimee J. 

Frederickson, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Michael Ademola Adepoju, a native and citizen of 

Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the 

immigration judge’s denial of his requests for adjustment of 

status and voluntary departure. We have reviewed the record and 

find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Adepoju 

is ineligible for adjustment of status and voluntary departure. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons 

stated by the Board. See In re: Adepoju (B.I.A. Sept. 10, 

2008).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

PETITION DENIED

 *

 We specifically uphold the finding that the order imposing 

probation without any adjudication of guilt constituted a 

conviction for immigration purposes. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1101(a)(48)(A) (2006); Yanez-Popp v. INS, 998 F.2d 231 (4th 

Cir. 1993).
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:







1.
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.






















s/Marliss D.
Johnson


Marliss D.
Johnson


Vice
President


Controller
and Treasurer


May 8,
2009
Exhibit 10.19


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT NO. I TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(the “Amendment “), dated as of September 28, 2016, by and between TurnPoint Medical Devices, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”) and Joerg H. Klaube (the “Executive”), each of which are sometimes referred to as a “Party”
and collectively as the “Parties”.


 


BACKGROUND:


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive
executed and delivered a certain Employment Agreement, dated November 10, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”) which contains
a clause that both parties agree should be deleted, and;


 


WHEREAS , the parties desire to
execute and deliver this Amendment which shall delete certain specific portions of the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the mutual promises made to each other, the Parties agree as follows:


 


1.   The
Amendment. (A).  The Parties agree to amend the Employment Agreement by deleting the last sentence of Paragraph
4 (d) on Page 2 thereof which reads as follows:


 


As a condition to receiving the Initial Options Award, Executive
shall if requested, execute and deliver a letter in a form approved by the Company’s underwriters agreeing not to sell any shares
of Company common stock during a customary period following the completion of an initial public offering of the Company’s common
stock.


 


(B).  The Parties further agree to amend the Employment
Agreement by deleting Section 10(d)(i) on Page 10 thereof which reads as follows:


 


(i)            Release
of Claims. The Company shall commence payment of Severance 30 days after the date of the Executive’s termination of employment,
provided that the Executive has signed and not revoked a general release and separation agreement, in form and


substance as set forth on Exhibit
B
to this Agreement.


 


(C).  The Parties further agree to amend the Employment Agreement by deleting Exhibit B, entitled,, “Form of Release
Agreement” in its entirety.


 


2.   Confirmation
of all Other Terms and Provisions. Except for the sentence deleted by this Amendment, the Parties hereby reconfirm and
ratify all of the other terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement not expressly modified by this Amendment and further confirm
their validity and enforceability under applicable law.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties
have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first above written .


 


	COMPANY:   Turnpoint Medical Devices, Inc.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ John R. Toedtman	 
	 	John R. Toedtman, Chairman	 
	 	Board of Directors	 
	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE:   Joerg H. Klaube	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/  Joerg H. Klaube	 
	 	Joerg H. Klaube
Exhibit 10.18


                      [ESC MEDICAL SYSTEMS LTD. LETTERHEAD

                                February 22, 2001

To: Arie Genger
From: Yacha Sutton

                         Subject: ESC Stock Option Plan

Dear Arie,

I am extremely pleased to inform you that the company has decided to grant you
stock options of 300,000 shares of ESC Medical Systems. The options will have an
immediate vesting period and will be exercisable in pursuance to the terms and
conditions of the 2000 Stock Option Plan which will be approved in the upcoming
annual shareholder's meeting, at an exercise price of $10.90.

The options are granted in connection with and subject to the completion of the
Coherent transaction.

This stock option plan was developed by the Board to enable you to participate
in the continued success of the company and in appreciation for your personal
contribution to this success, as a special advisor to the company.

I wish all of us continued growth and success.

Best Regards,
Yacha Sutton
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 28, 1979

404 A.2d 1358

#### Commonwealth v. Bowen, Jr., Appellant.

Submitted November 14, 1977.

Dana H. Fales, for appellant; Robert J. Felton, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

SPAETH, J., concurred in the result.

JACOBS, former P. J., WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.