alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-24175-JAL

NIGEL FRANK DE LA TORRE PARDO,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUITY ONE (FLORIDA 

PORTFOLIO) LLC D/B/A BIRD 

LUDLAM, GABLES AH, LLC D/B/A 

CAROLINA ALE HOUSE, WINNDIXIE STORES, INC. D/B/A WINNDIXIE #249 and ORSILLO 

ENTERPRISES INC D/B/A BIRD 

ROAD DAIRY QUEEN,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, NIGEL FRANK DE LA TORRE PARDO, (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant,

GABLES AH, LLC D/B/A CAROLINA ALE HOUSE (“Defendant”), by and through 

undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby 

STIPULATE AND AGREE that this matter has been settled and to the immediate dismissal of this 

action with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs except as indicated 

in the settlement agreement. 

STIPULATED AND AGREED by Counsel for the Parties on the dates below written.

Respectfully submitted on May 10, 2023.

/s/ Anthony J. Perez

ANTHONY J. PEREZ

Florida Bar No. 535451

GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

350 Sevilla Avenue, Suite 200

Coral Gables, Fl 33134

/s/ Pamela Nagel

PAMELA NAGEL

FL Bar No. 1008151

NICOLE M. WALL

FL Bar No. 017430

COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. 

Case 1:22-cv-24175-JAL Document 72 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served via the 

Court's electronic filing system upon all parties of record on May 10, 2023.

GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

350 Sevilla Avenue, Suite 200

Coral Gables, Fl 33134

Telephone: (305) 553-3464

Facsimile: (305) 553-3031

Primary E-Mail: ajperez@lawgmp.com

Secondary E-Mail: bvirues@lawgmp.com; 

dramos@lawgmp.com

By: ___/s/_Anthony J. Perez________

 ANTHONY J. PEREZ

Florida Bar No.: 535451

Telephone: (305) 553- 3464

Email: ajperez@lawgmp.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff

222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 120 West Palm Beach, 

FL 33401 

Phone: (561) 383-9200

Emails : Nicole.Wall@csklegal.com; 

Pamela.Nagel@csklegal.com

Attorneys for Defendant GABLES AH, LLC d/b/a 

CAROLINA ALE HOUSE

Case 1:22-cv-24175-JAL Document 72 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2023 Page 2 of 2
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00286-CR

IN RE JUSTIN S. MATTHEWS

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Justin S. Matthews’s petition for writ of mandamus was filed on September 2, 2016. 

In his petition, Matthews complains about the trial court’s failure to rule on a motion, 

specifically “Defendant’s First Motion for Appointment of Counsel for Habeas Corpus.” 

Since the filing of the petition, the trial court has denied Matthews’s motion.

Accordingly, Matthews’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition dismissed as moot

Opinion delivered and filed September 28, 2016

Do not publish 

[OT06]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                            3649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5386
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                      86103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 99681
<PP&E>                                           33280
<DEPRECIATION>                                   15711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  124491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            36517
<BONDS>                                          16064
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                       71054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    124491
<SALES>                                          64287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 64287
<CGS>                                            46300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    46300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   984
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1501)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (586)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (915)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (915)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
J

~ 'CED STq l

~ S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY W WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 o Q

0 k
q< PROS

~ G

~ ? 

### S E P 2 2 2009

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION



### J.R. Stroble Acting Director, National TRU Program U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090
Dear Mr. Stroble: This letter approves the Tier 1(T1) change to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s baseline approval of the Central Characterization Project (CCP)'s Remote-Handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste characterization (WC) program at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This T1 evaluation consisted of visual examination technique (VET) for RH TRU waste at INL-CCP for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). In July 2009, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) verbally requested EPA evaluate and approve the VET for RH TRU waste as a T1 change. On August 11, 2009, EPA performed the T1 evaluation and found the requested change technically adequate to characterize RH TRU debris (S5000), solid/sludge (S3000), and soils/gravel (S4000) waste categories at INL. If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Lindsey Bender at (202) 343-9479.

Sincerely,

1 v'rl Tom Peake, Director Center for Waste Management and Regulations



### Enclosure

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper

### cc: Electronic Distribution

Alton Harris, DOE HQ Vernon Daub, CBFO Norma Castaneda, CBFO Courtland Fesmire, CBFO Ava Holland, CBFO Dennis Miehls, CBFO Martin Navarrete, CBFO Steve Zappe, NMED D K Ploetz, WTS-CCP Mike Sensibaugh, WTS-CCP Allison Pangle, CTAC Wayne Ledford, CTAC
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2944030-APR-201308:41 AM
function fusionGetScrollOffset(){var t,o=fusion.getAdminbarHeight(),e="function"==typeof getStickyHeaderHeight?getStickyHeaderHeight():0,s=parseInt(o+e+1,10);return jQuery(".fusion-tb-header").length&&"function"==typeof fusionGetStickyOffset?(t=fusionGetStickyOffset())?t+1:o:s}jQuery(document).ready(function(){jQuery("body").scrollspy({target:".fusion-menu",offset:fusionGetScrollOffset()}),jQuery(window).on("load fusion-sticky-change fusion-sticky-scroll-change",function(){"object"==typeof jQuery("body").data()["bs.scrollspy"]&&(jQuery("body").data()["bs.scrollspy"].options.offset=fusionGetScrollOffset())}),jQuery(window).on("fusion-sticky-transition-change",function(){setTimeout(function(){"object"==typeof jQuery("body").data()["bs.scrollspy"]&&(jQuery("body").data()["bs.scrollspy"].options.offset=fusionGetScrollOffset())},300)})});
#### § 109-43.307-54 Unsafe personal property.

Personal property that is considered defective or unsafe must be mutilated prior to shipment for disposal.
15 December 2015

306P15

#### Karen Jensen v. Blake Jessamy, in his individual and official capacities; Rodney Monroe, in his individual and official capacities; The City of Charlotte; Richard Stahnke, in his individual and official capacities; Sgt. Elliot, in his individual and official capacities; Sheriff Daniel Chipp Bailey, in his individual and official capacities; Sheriff A. Conner, in his individual and official capacities; Sheriff G. Coble, in his individual and official capacities; Sheriff Employees at the Mecklenburg County Jail; John Doe, in his individual and official capacities; Deputy Horn, in his individual and official capacities; Deputy Pillow, in his individual and official capacities; Deputy Durant, in his individual and official capacities; and Deputy Williams, in his individual and official capacities

1. Pit’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-35)

1.

2. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 .

2. Denied

3. Defs’ (Mecklenburg County Sheriff Defendants) Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Allowed

4. Defs’ (City Defendants) Motion to Dismiss Appeal

4. Allowed

Ervin, J.,

recused
#### § 302-3.418 May my agency pay for property management services when I am authorized a TCS?

Your agency may reimburse you directly for expenses you incur or make payments on your behalf to a relocation services company, if you so choose. The term “property management services” refers to a program provided by a private company for a fee, which assists you in managing your residence at your previous official station as a rental property. Services provided by the company may include, but are not limited to, obtaining a tenant, negotiating a lease, inspecting the property regularly, managing repairs and maintenance, enforcing lease terms, collecting rent, paying the mortgage and other carrying expenses from rental proceeds and/or fund of the employee, and accounting for the transactions and providing periodic reports to the employee.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-06, 76 FR 71889, Nov. 21, 2011]
§ 302-17.22 What relocation expenses does the WTA not cover? The WTA does not cover the following relocation expenses: ( a ) Any reimbursement, allowance, or direct payment to a vendor that should not be reported as taxable income when you file your Federal tax return; this includes but is not limited to expenses for transportation of POVs for OCONUS assignments.
( b ) Reimbursed expenses for extended storage of household goods during an OCONUS assignment, if reimbursement is permitted under your agency's policy.
( c ) State and local withholding tax obligations. To the extent that your state or local tax authority requires periodic (such as quarterly) tax payments, you are responsible to pay these from your own funds. Your agency reimburses you for substantially all of these payments through the RITA process, but your agency does not provide a WTA for them. If required to by state or local law, your agency may withhold these from your reimbursement.
( d ) Additional taxes due under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act including Social Security tax, if applicable, and Medicare tax. Current law does not allow Federal agencies to reimburse transferees for these employment taxes on relocation benefits. However, your agency will deduct for these taxes from your reimbursements for taxable items.
( e ) Home marketing incentive payment. In accordance with FTR part 302-14, your agency may not provide you either a WTA or RITA for this incentive.
( f ) Any recruitment, relocation, or retention incentive payment that you receive. Any withholding of taxes for such payments is outside the scope of this regulation. Rather, it is covered by regulations issued by the Office of Personnel Management, Treasury's Financial Management Service, and the IRS.
( g ) Any allowances, reimbursements, and/or direct payments to vendors not related to your relocation; for example, a reimbursement for office supplies would not be covered by the WTA, even if it occurred during your relocation.
[FTR Amdt. 2014-01, 79 FR 49645, Aug. 21, 2014, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2020-02, 84 FR 64782, Nov. 25, 2019]
§ 50-203.18 Evidence. ( a ) Witnesses appearing at the hearing need not be sworn. The administrative law judge may, however, within his discretion, require that witnesses take an oath or affirmation as to testimony submitted.
( b ) Written statements may be filed any time prior to the date of the hearing by persons who cannot appear personally.
( c ) Written documents and exhibits shall be tendered in quadruplicate. When evidence is embraced in a document containing matter not intended to be put in evidence, within the discretion of the administrative law judge, such a document will not be received but the person offering the same may present to the administrative law judge the original document together with two copies of those portions of the document intended to be put in evidence.
( d ) At any stage of the hearing, the administrative law judge may call for further evidence upon any matter. After the hearing has been closed, no further evidence shall be taken, except at the request of the Administrative Review Board, unless provision has been made at the hearing for the later receipt of such evidence. In the event that the Administrative Review Board shall cause the hearing to be reopened for the purpose of receiving further evidence, due and reasonable notice of the time and place fixed for such taking of testimony shall be given to all persons who have appeared at the hearing or filed a notice of intention to appear at the hearing.
( e ) The rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law or equity shall not be controlling. However, it shall be the policy to exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence.
[17 FR 7944, Aug. 30, 1952. Redesignated at 24 FR 10952, Dec. 30, 1959, as amended at 61 FR 19988, May 3, 1996]
In The Matter Of: 

PHILIP PUTTER 

Respondent 

SERVED: MAY 15, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. F AA-20 15-0210 

Case No. 2013EA110075 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On May 14,2015, the FAA informally contacted the Office of Hearings ("OH") by 

telephone, and asked the OH attorney staff about the status ofthis proceeding. The FAA advised 

the OH attorney staff that the Respondent had filed a one-page Letter with the FAA's Hearing 

Docket, seeking to withdraw his March 5, 2015 Request for Hearing ("Request"). 

The OH attorney staff advised the FAA that the Respondent had not filed any documents 

with the Court. The OH attorney staff then conducted a web search on regulations.gov and 

found a one-page Letter, dated April 9, 2015, in which the Respondent stated that "[t]he matter 

has been settled between the parties." The Respondent asked to withdraw his Request for 

hearing. Although the Respondent sent his Letter to the FAA Hearing Docket and the FAA 

attorney, he did not file a copy ofthe letter with the Court. As a result, the OH attorney staff 

copied the Letter, and placed it in the Court's file. 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn his Request for Hearing, 

and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Ms. Judith L. Vaughan 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3255 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

Mr. Lawrence R. DiGiansante 

Respondent Counsel 

ONE COPY 

Mr. Philip Putter 

Respondent 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0210 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

984 Morris Park A venue 

Bronx, NY 10462 

TEL: 718-822-0707 

7 5 Westlake Dr. 

Thornwood, NY 10594 

TEL: 917-903-7575 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
38628 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 21, 2000 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

June 14, 2000.

The Department of the Treasury has

submitted the following public

information collection requirement(s) to

OMB for review and clearance under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13. Copies of the

submission(s) may be obtained by

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance

Officer listed. Comments regarding this

information collection should be

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed

and to the Treasury Department

Clearance Officer, Department of the

Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be

received on or before July 21, 2000.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545–0239.

Form Number: IRS Form 5754.

Type of Review: Extension.

Title: Statement by Person(s)

Receiving Gambling Winnings.

Description: Section 3402(q)(6) of the

Internal Revenue Code (IRC) requires a

statement by the person receiving

certain gambling winnings when that

person is not the winner or is one of a

group of winners. It enables the payer to

properly apportion the winnings and

withheld tax on Form W–2G. We use

the information on Form W–2G to

ensure that recipients are properly

reporting their income.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit, Individuals or households, Notfor-profit institutions.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

306,000.

Estimated Burden Hours Per

Respondent: 12 minutes.

Frequency of Response: On occasion.

Estimated Total Reporting Burden:

61,200 hours.

OMB Number: 1545–1059.

Form Number: IRS Form 7018 and

7018–A.

Type of Review: Extension.

Title: Employer’s Order Blank for

Forms (7018); and Employer’s Order

Blank for 2000 Forms.

Description: Forms 7018 and 7018–A

allow taxpayers who must file

information returns a systematic way to

order information tax forms materials.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

1,668,000.

Estimated Burden Hours Per

Respondent: 3 minutes.

Frequency of Response: Annually.

Estimated Total Reporting Burden:

83,400 hours.

Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear,

Internal Revenue Service, Room 5244,

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20224.

OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt

(202) 395–7860, Office of Management

and Budget, Room 10202, New

Executive Office Building, Washington,

DC 20503.

Dale A. Morgan,

Departmental Reports Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–15657 Filed 6–20–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–U
```

[111th Congress Public Law 250]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 2630]]

Public Law 111-250
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until September 30, 
              2011. <<NOTE: Sept. 30, 2010 -  [S. 3814]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: National Flood 
Insurance Program Reextension Act of 2010.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 42 USC 4001 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Flood Insurance Program 
Reextension Act of 2010''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) Program Extension.--Section 1319 of the National Flood Insurance 
Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking ``September 30, 
2010'' and inserting ``September 30, 2011''.
    (b) Financing.--Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 
2010'' and inserting ``September 30, 2011''.

    Approved September 30, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3814:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Sept. 21, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 23, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 758 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 758

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

                   For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 758

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                   For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO WIDOW'S INSURANCE BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of determining the eligibility of 
Nancy B. Wilson, the wife of Alphonse M. Wilson (Social Security No. 
271-18-9548), to widow's insurance benefits under section 202(e) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(e)), Nancy B. Wilson shall be deemed 
to have been married to Alphonse M. Wilson for a period of not less 
than 9 months immediately prior to the day on which Alphonse M. Wilson 
died.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) takes effect on March 21, 1991.
    (c) Payment.--Any benefits to which Nancy B. Wilson is entitled for 
the period prior to the date of the enactment of this Act shall be paid 
to her in a lump sum.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 4, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 115-1.110 Deviations.

Where deemed necessary that regulations set forth in the FPMR or EPPMR be changed in the interest of program effectiveness, a proposed revision will be submitted in accordance with FPR § 1-1.009, to the Division of Data and Support Systems (DSSD) for review and consideration.
§ 102-85.5 By what authority is the pricing policy in this part prescribed? ( a ) General authority is granted in the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended, Sec. 205(c) and 210(j), 63 Stat. 390 and 86 Stat. 219; (40 U.S.C. 486(c) and 40 U.S.C. 490(j), respectively).
( b ) This part implements the applicable provisions of Federal law, including, but not limited to, the: ( 1 ) Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 377, as amended;
( 2 ) Act of July 1, 1898 (40 U.S.C. 285);
( 3 ) Act of April 28, 1902 (40 U.S.C. 19);
( 4 ) Act of August 27, 1935 (40 U.S.C. 304c);
( 5 ) Public Buildings Act of 1959, as amended (40 U.S.C. 601-619);
( 6 ) Public Buildings Amendments of 1972, Pub. L. 92-313, (86 Stat. 219);
( 7 ) Rural Development Act of 1972, Pub. L. 92-419, (86 Stat. 674);
( 8 ) Reorganization Plan No. 18 of 1950 (40 U.S.C. 490 note);
( 9 ) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3601 *et seq.*);
( 10 ) National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*);
( 11 ) Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 and the Federal Urban Land Use Act (42 U.S.C. 4201-4244; 40 U.S.C. 531-535);
( 12 ) Public Buildings Cooperative Use Act of 1976, as amended (40 U.S.C. 490(a)(16)-(19), 601a and 612a);
( 13 ) Public Buildings Amendments of 1988, Pub. L. 100-678, (102 Stat. 4049);
( 14 ) National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (16 U.S.C. 461 *et seq.*);
( 15 ) Executive Order 12072 of August 16, 1978 (43 FR 36869);
( 16 ) Executive Order 12411 of March 29, 1983 (48 FR 13391);
( 17 ) Executive Order 12512 of April 29, 1985 (50 FR 18453);
( 18 ) Executive Order 13005 of May 21, 1996 (61 FR 26069); and
( 19 ) Executive Order 13006 of May 21, 1996 (61 FR 26071).