alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901


## OCT 15 2012
Mr. RichardW. Corey Deputy Executive Officer CaliforniaAirResources Board Post Office Box 2815 Sacramento, California 95812 Dear Mr. Corey: On September20, 2012, the CaliforniaAirResources Board submitted revisions to the California State ImplementationPlan. We have reviewed materials submitted withthe following rule and found that itfulfills the completeness criteria in 40 Code ofFederal Regulations Part 51, Appendix V. APCD/AQMD Rule # Rule Title Monterey Bay Unified 400 Visible Emissions This addresses all revisions in this submittal, Inthe coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuantto Clean AirAct section 110(k). Questions regarding ourcompleteness review should be directedto CynthiaG. Allen at (415) 947-4120. Sincerely,

Director, AirDivision
cc: Mr. Richard Stedman, APCO Monterey Bay Unified APCD Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluation Section Stationary Source Division

Printedon Riled Paper

### EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V
Submittal Date September 20, 2012 District Name Monterey Bay Unified APCD 

### Date Reviewed October 11, 2012 EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen 

### Key: C NIA 0 = 

### Complete

= 

### Incomplete

= 

### NotApplicable To Rule

= 

### Material Missing

400 ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (perAppendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letterfrom Governor/designee X 

### (b) Evidence ofadoption X 

### (c) State/District legal authority to adopt X 

### (dl) Copy ofactual rule/plan X 

### (d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X 

### (e) Proofthat action met procedural requirements X 

### (f) Copy ofpublic notice X 

### (g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X 

### (h) Public comments & agency response N/A TECHNICAL SUPPORT (perAppendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified N/A (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X 

### (c) Rule/plan emissions impact X 

### (d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A (e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A (f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X 

### (g) Evidence oflimits & other needed requirements X 

### (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A OVERALL COMPLETENESS C Notes:
# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 

# Time and Date: 

10:00 a.m., Wednesday, January 26, 2000. 

# Place: 

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551 

# Status:

 Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered: 

1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees. 

2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting. 

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204. 

# Supplementary Information: 

You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting. 

Dated: January 19, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-1618 Filed 1-19-00; 12:05 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 105-64.408 What is my recourse to a denial decision?

You may file a civil action to have the GSA decision overturned within two years after denial of an amendment appeal. You may file the civil action in a Federal District Court where you live or have a principal place of business, where the records are maintained, or in the District of Columbia.
Exhibit 32.3


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Sean M. Healey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 31, 2015





/s/ SEAN M. HEALEYSean M. HealeyChief Executive Officer and Chairman
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D22-2082

LT Case No. 2021-CA-000116

_____________________________

EDWARD R. LEVINE,

Appellant,

v.

VICTOR O. MEAD,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County.

Jessica J. Recksiedler, Judge.

Edward R. Levine, Titusville, pro se. 

Victor O. Mead, of the Law Offices of Victor O. Mead, Winter 

Park, pro se. 

February 20, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, EISNAUGLE, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 29, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00186

- CV

COTTER & SONS, INC. ; James F. Cotter; Alamo Towers

- Cotter, LLC; Cotter 11211 Katy Freeway Building, LP; Cotter 7447 Harwin Building, LP; Cotter Equities LLC; Cotter Harwin Equities LLC; Cot ter Katy Equities LLC; Cotter Katy Freeway Building, LP; Et al.

, Appellant s

v.

BJ CORPORATION d/b/a National Building Service

,

Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 09427

Honorable Gloria Saldana , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants’ motion for extension of time to file their reply brief is GRANTED. Appellants’ reply brief is due January 26, 2017. No further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of Decemb er, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 304-1.1 To whom do the pronouns “I”, “you”, and their variants refer throughout this part?

Use of pronouns “I”, “you”, and their variants throughout this part refers to the employee.
# Comments on: 2021-2311: SoClean, Inc. v. Sunset Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
Opinion issued March 13, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-17-00581-CV

———————————

BRAD JONES, Appellant

V.

THIRD MILLENNIUM CAPITAL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 11th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2015-19785

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Brad Jones, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file 

brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did 

not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal 
2

of case). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to 

timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown.
No. 11-9523.

#### Portillo-Escalante *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Analogic Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, James W. Green,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: March 11, 2011



/s/ James W. GreenJames W. GreenPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000004187
<NAME> INDUSTRIAL SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         986,205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,875,991
<ALLOWANCES>                                   116,600
<INVENTORY>                                  2,763,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,866,965
<PP&E>                                       7,299,023
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,209,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,870,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,143,042
<BONDS>                                      4,508,697
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,575
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,568,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,870,654
<SALES>                                     14,958,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,488,081
<CGS>                                       13,189,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               44,577,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,348,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   121,764
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            309,046
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   309,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-9504.

#### Gross *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 10-1366.

#### Guerrero *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 109-45.105-3 Exemptions.

GSA, by letter dated May 28, 1965, exempted contractor inventory held by DOE designated contractors from the GSA conducted sales provisions of 41 CFR 101-45.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                       3,227,013
<SECURITIES>                                 8,143,211
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,370,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,019,756
<PP&E>                                       1,255,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                 812,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,204,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,438,345
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        45,417
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,819,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,204,291
<SALES>                                     13,221,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,221,531
<CGS>                                        2,025,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,277,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             141,477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,163,653
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,045,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,118,653
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,118,653
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
        

</TABLE>
### Fw: For the ozone NAAQS docket . Fw: Ozone documents 1 Tricia Crabtree to: crabtree.tricia 07/13/2010 09:48 AM

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Tricia Crabtree" <crabtree.tricia@epa.gov>, "Susan Stone" <stone.susan@epa.gov> Date: 07/01/2010 08:12 PM Subject: For the ozone NAAQS docket. Fw: Ozone documents 1

This and the next two e-mails contain documents that API gave to Janet McCabe at the meeting with her and Rob on June 18. Thanks.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Khary Cauthen" [cauthenk@api.org] Sent: 07/01/2010 04:58 PM AST To: Rob Brenner; Lydia Wegman Subject: Ozone documents 1

Sorry that I can't figure out how to get all these into one email, so this is the first of three emails : ) I think that this covers all that was mentioned at our meeting last Friday. Happy Independence Day

Khary Cauthen 202-682-8209

This e-mail is intended only for the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this communication in error, please delete the email from your system and notify me immediately.
043P15

#### State v. Reginald U. Fullard

1. Defs *Pro Se*PWC to Review Order of Superior Court of Forsyth County

1. Dismissed

2. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

3. Dismissed as moot
#### § 301-10.121 When may I use coach class seating upgrade programs?

Use of upgraded coach class seating options is generally a traveler's personal choice and therefore is at the traveler's personal expense. However, your agency approving official may approve reimbursement of the additional seat choice fee according to part 301-13 of this chapter or internal agency policy (see § 301-70.102(k)).

[FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55704, Sept. 12, 2022]
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
                 AMERITRUCK DISTRIBUTION CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (In thousands, except ratio amounts)
                                   (unaudited)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Twelve Months Ended December 31
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------
                                                       1993       1994       1995       1996        1997
                                                     --------   --------   --------   --------    --------
<S>                                                  <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>
Earnings:
   Income (loss) before income taxes
      and extraordinary items                        $  3,551   $  5,431   $  5,677   $ (1,892)   $(17,274)
                                                     --------   --------   --------   --------    --------

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense and amortization of debt
      discount and premium on all indebtedness          3,783      3,422      4,993     16,677      21,015
   Portion of rent under long-term operating
      leases representative of an interest
      factor                                              306        309        573      1,658       3,429
   Preferred stock dividend requirements of
      consolidated subsidiaries                         1,224      1,486        188          -           -
                                                     --------   --------   --------   --------    --------
           Total fixed charges                          5,313      5,217      5,754     18,335      24,444
                                                     --------   --------   --------   --------    --------

   Earnings before income taxes, extraordinary
      items and fixed charges                           8,864     10,648     11,431     16,443       7,170
                                                     ========   ========   ========   ========    ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                      1.67x      2.04x      1.99x          *           *
                                                     ========   ========   ========   ========    ========
</TABLE>



*        The Company's earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by
         $17,274 and $1,892 for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996,
         respectively.
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 2, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00585

- CR

Michael SUTTON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 08

- 2137

- CR William Old, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant Michael Sutton is advised he has the right to review the appellate record to assist him in preparing a pro se brief in response to the Anders brief filed by court

- appointed

counsel . If appellant desires to exercise this right, he must file a written request for access to the

record with this court by July 17, 2014

. The request must reference this appeal and be mailed to:

Fourth Court of Appeals 300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200

San Antoni o, Texas 78232

Appellant’s pro se brief, was due on June 19, 2014. However, i f appellant t imely requests access to the record, the deadline to file appellant’s pro se brief will be reset.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of July, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 100 
          - [CGD 05-00-021] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of implementation. 

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard is implementing the special local regulations found at 33 CFR 100.518 during the fireworks display to be held July 4, 2000, on the Severn River at Annapolis, Maryland. These special local regulations are necessary to control vessel traffic due to the confined nature of the waterway and expected vessel congestion during the fireworks display. The effect will be to restrict general navigation in the regulated area for the safety of spectators and vessels transiting the event area. 

# EFFECTIVE DATES:

33 CFR 100.518 is effective from 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 4, 2000 and July 5, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chief Warrant Officer R. L. Houck, Marine Events Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard Activities Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, MD 21226-1971, (410) 576-2674. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The City of Annapolis will sponsor a fireworks display on July 4, 2000 on the Severn River, Annapolis, Maryland. If the event is postponed due to weather conditions, the temporary special local regulations will be effective from 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 5, 2000. The fireworks display will be launched from a barge positioned within the regulated area. In order to ensure the safety of spectators and transiting vessels, 33 CFR 100.518 will be in effect for the duration of the event. Under provisions of 33 CFR 100.518, a vessel may not enter the regulated area unless it receives permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Spectator vessels may anchor outside the regulated area but may not block a navigable channel. Because these restrictions will be in effect for a limited period, they should not result in a significant disruption of maritime traffic. 

      ( print page 39104)    
Dated: June 8, 2000. 

J. E. Shkor,

Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 00-15941 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P