alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Angelica Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 29, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen M. O'Hara, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
               U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Dated: December 8, 2005

                                                     /s/ Stephen M. O'Hara
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Stephen M. O'Hara
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
§ 102-41.55 Where do we send the reports for seized or forfeited personal property? ( a ) Except for the items noted in paragraph (b) of this section, report seized or forfeited personal property not retained for official use to the General Services Administration, Property Management Branch (3FPD), Washington, DC 20407.
( b ) Report aircraft, firearms, and vessels to the regional GSA Property Management Branch office specified in § 102-36.125 of this subchapter B.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50750

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES BLANTON CHRISTESSON,

a/k/a James B. Christiansen, Sr.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-94-CR-216-2

- - - - - - - - - -

June 19, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Blanton Christesson appeals his sentence following a

jury trial conviction for conspiracy to import marihuana,

importation of marihuana, conspiracy to possess marihuana, and

possession with intent to distribute marihuana. He contends that

the district court erred by refusing to depart downward from the

guidelines sentence based on either his poor health and advanced
No. 95-50750

- 2 -

age, the over-representation of his criminal history, or a

combination of the factors.

Because the district court acknowledged the possible reasons

for departing downward, but refused to do so because it decided

to follow the guidelines, the district court’s refusal to depart

did not violate the law. See United States v. McKinney, 53 F.3d

664, 677 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 261, and cert

denied, 116 S. Ct. 265, and cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 431 (1995); 

see also United States v. Madison, 990 F.2d 178, 184 (5th Cir.),

cert. dismissed, 114 S. Ct. 339 (1993).

AFFIRMED.
#### § 105-72.207 Certifications and representations.

Unless prohibited by statute or codified regulation, each Federal awarding agency is authorized and encouraged to allow recipients to submit certifications and representations required by statute, executive order, or regulation on an annual basis, if the recipients have ongoing and continuing relationships with the agency. Annual certifications and representations shall be signed by responsible officials with the authority to ensure recipients' compliance with the pertinent requirements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000005656
<NAME>                                         American Precious Metals, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         6,577
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,727
<PP&E>                                         11,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,070)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          49,664
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,948
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,148
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,069)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,069)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,069)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
# Comments on: 23-2000: FREEMAN v. OPM [ORDER], Nonprecedential
402P15

#### State v. Donna Helms Ledbetter

1. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-414)

1.

2. State’s Motion to Strike Def’s Reply to State’s Response

2.

3. Def’s Motion to Hold PDR in Abeyance

3.

4. Def’s Motion for Temporary Stay

4. Allowed 12/17/2015

5. Def’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*5.*
#### § 302-2.19 Can my service agreement be voided by a subsequent service agreement?

No, service agreements which are already in effect cannot be voided by subsequent service agreements.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2014-01, 79 FR 49644, Aug. 21, 2014]
#### § 302-12.9 If my agency authorizes me to enter a homesale program, must I accept a buyout offer from the relocation services company?

No, if your agency authorizes you to enter a homesale program, your agency must give you the option to accept or reject an offer from the relocation services company.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated at 76 FR 18343, Apr. 1, 2011]
#### § 109-40.304 Rate tenders to the Government.

Under the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. 10721), common carriers are permitted to submit to the Government tenders which contain rates lower than published tariff rates available to the general public. In addition, rates tenders may be applied to shipments other than those made by the Government provided the total benefits accrue to the Government; that is, provided the Government pays the charges or directly and completely reimburses the party that initially bears the freight charges (323 ICC 347 and 332 ICC 161).
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 56

Prohibiting the manufacture, sale, delivery, or importation of buses that

do not have seat belts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

Prohibiting the manufacture, sale, delivery, or importation

of buses that do not have seat belts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

4 No person shall manufacture, sell, deliver, or import

5 any bus, constructed after the effective date of this Act,

6 for use by a person described in section 2 to provide trans7 portation service, unless such bus is equipped with a seat

8 belt for each passenger riding in such bus.

9 SEC. 2. PERSONS TO WHICH PROHIBITION APPLIES.

10 The prohibition set forth in section 1 shall apply to—
2

•HR 56 IH

1 (1) any bus, including a school bus, designed to

2 transport more than 15 passengers, including the

3 driver; and

4 (2) any Federal, State, or local government en5 tity, school district, or other public or private entity

6 providing transportation to passengers by bus.

7 SEC. 3. CIVIL PENALTIES; SECRETARY’S AUTHORITY TO

8 COMPROMISE.

9 (a) AMOUNT OF PENALTIES.—Whoever violates any

10 provision of this Act, or any regulation issued thereunder,

11 shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000

12 for each such violation. A violation with respect to each

13 bus shall constitute a separate violation, except that the

14 maximum civil penalty shall not exceed $800,000 for any

15 related series of violations.

16 (b) COMPROMISE OF PENALTIES.—Any such civil

17 penalty may be compromised by the Secretary of Trans18 portation. In determining the amount of such penalty, or

19 the amount agreed upon in compromise, the appropriate20 ness of such penalty to the size of the business of the per21 son charged and the gravity of the violation shall be con22 sidered.
3

•HR 56 IH

1 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 This Act shall take effect 90 days after the date of

3 its enactment.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,916
<SECURITIES>                                    10,604
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,746
<ALLOWANCES>                                       121
<INVENTORY>                                      2,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,208
<PP&E>                                           3,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,323
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,520
<SALES>                                          7,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,754
<CGS>                                            2,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,154)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,154)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.33)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|               |  |                            
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:          |  |                            
|March 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|               |  |                            
|               |  | Marc N. Teal               
|               |  | Principal Financial Officer
|               |  |                            
|               |  |                            
|               |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1445 Market Street ▪ Denver ▪ CO, 80202 

Tel: (303) 620 8083

June 1, 2012

Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

RE: DOT-OST-2012-0083

Dear Secretary LaHood:

On behalf of the Metro Denver Aviation Coalition (MDAC), please accept this letter of support for 

the application of Volaris to operate scheduled passenger service between Denver International 

Airport (“DEN”) and Mexico City’s Benito Juárez International Airport. 

MDAC is an affiliate of the Metro Denver Economic Development Corporation dedicated to the 

continued growth of Metro Denver’s aviation industry and the success of DEN and the region’s 

general aviation and reliever airports. Its membership encompasses a broad spectrum of business 

leaders from both the private and public sectors who provide advocacy and support in such areas as 

job growth planning, airport and infrastructure development, and route expansion and retention. 

MDAC believes an expanded passenger service between DEN and Mexico City will be 

economically beneficial to growing the local and our national economy. Mexico is one of the top 

export nations for Colorado's goods and services, and the improved passenger service will provide 

opportunities to expand these trade and economic relationships and increase visits to Colorado and 

the mountain west for business and recreation.

DEN has lacked year-round nonstop service to Mexico City since the bankruptcy of Mexicana in 

August 2010. The introduction of new service by Volaris will stimulate market demand, further 

growing passenger traffic that will benefit all carriers. In addition, new international air service is a 

key driver of new jobs and economic activity in the Denver metro area and across the State of 

Colorado.
1445 Market Street ▪ Denver ▪ CO, 80202 

Tel: (303) 620 8083

Denver and Colorado are home to one of the largest Mexican-American populations in the United 

States, and Mexico City ranks as one of DEN’s largest international markets. The strong 

community of interest, in addition to the growing business, tourism and cultural links between 

Colorado and Mexico, will greatly benefit from this new service. 

Thank you in advance for your consideration. We urge you to approve this application.

Sincerely,

Travis Vallin 

Chair, Metro Denver Aviation Coalition
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Osprey Gold Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Georges Benarroch,
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Georges Benarroch               Date: March 23, 2007
    ---------------------------------
Name: Georges Benarroch
Title: President (Chief Financial
       Officer)

<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Osprey Gold Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeans Jacques
Treyvaud, Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Jean Jacques Treyvaud           Date: March 23, 2007
    ---------------------------------
Name: Jean Jacques Treyvaud
Title: Director
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 620

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a test to determine

the costs and benefits of requiring jet-propelled aircraft taking off from

Newark International Airport, New Jersey, to conduct ascents over the

ocean, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 1999

Mr. FRANKS (for himself, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, and Mrs. ROUKEMA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a test

to determine the costs and benefits of requiring jetpropelled aircraft taking off from Newark International

Airport, New Jersey, to conduct ascents over the ocean,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEST OF AIRCRAFT OCEAN ROUTING.

4 In order to examine an option for reducing aircraft

5 noise over communities in New Jersey, the Secretary of

6 Transportation shall conduct a 6-month live test to deter7 mine the costs and benefits of requiring jet-propelled air-
2

•HR 620 IH

1 craft to conduct ascents after taking off from Newark

2 International Airport, New Jersey, over the ocean. The

3 Secretary shall commence such test not later than 45 days

4 after the date of enactment of this Act.

5 SEC. 2. REPORT.

6 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment

7 of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall transmit

8 to Congress a report on the results of the test conducted

9 under section 1. The report shall include an analysis of

10 the effects on noise reduction of ocean routing of aircraft

11 taking off from Newark International Airport and any rec12 ommendations and comments of the Secretary concerning

13 ocean routing of air carrier aircraft taking off from New14 ark International Airport.

Æ
#### § 109-27.5008 Control of drug substances.

Effective procedures and practices shall provide for the management and physical security of controlled substances from receipt to the point of use. Such procedures shall, as a minimum, provide for safeguarding, proper use, adequate records, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 680 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 680

     To reduce the number of executive branch political appointees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1999

Mr. Luther (for himself, Mr. Gutknecht, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Hall of Texas, 
 Mr. English, and Mr. Minge) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reduce the number of executive branch political appointees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF POLITICAL APPOINTEES.

    (a) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``political 
appointee'' means any individual who--
            (1) is employed in a position listed in sections 5312 
        through 5316 of title 5, United States Code (relating to the 
        Executive Schedule);
            (2) is a limited term appointee, limited emergency 
        appointee, or noncareer appointee in the Senior Executive 
        Service, as defined under section 3132(a) (5), (6), and (7) of 
        title 5, United States Code, respectively; or
            (3) is employed in a position in the executive branch of 
        the Government under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of 
        title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    (b) Limitation.--The President, acting through the Office of 
Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management, shall 
take such actions as necessary (including reduction-in-force actions 
under applicable procedures) to ensure that the number of political 
appointees shall not, during any fiscal year beginning after September 
30, 2000, exceed a total of 2,000 (determined on a full-time equivalent 
basis).
                                 <all>
```