alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 302-8.203 What is the authorized time period for extended storage of my HHG? Time limitations for extended storage of your HHG will be determined by your agency as follows: ( a ) For the duration of the OCONUS assignment plus 30 days prior to the time the tour begins and plus 60 days after the tour is completed;
( b ) Extensions may be allowed for subsequent service or tours of duty at the same or other overseas stations if you continue to be eligible as set forth in § 302-8.200; and
( c ) When eligibility ceases, storage at Government expense may continue until the beginning of the second month after the month in which your tour at the official station OCONUS terminates, unless to avoid inequity your agency extends the period.
#### § 301-73.201 What method of payment may be used for contract passenger transportation service?

GSA individual Government contractor-issued travel charge card(s), or your agency centrally billed or other established account, or a GTR (when no other option is available or feasible).

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15978, Apr. 1, 1998; 63 FR 35538, June 30, 1998]
§ 301-51.3 What classes of employees are exempt from mandatory use of the Government contractor-issued travel charge card? The Administrator of General Services exempts the following classes of employees from mandatory use of the Government contractor-issued travel charge card: ( a ) Any employee who has an application pending for the Government contractor-issued travel charge card;
( b ) Any employee, when issuance of the Government contractor-issued travel charge card would adversely affect the mission or put the employee at risk; and
( c ) Any employee who is not eligible to receive a Government contractor-issued travel charge card.
[FTR Amdt. 2016-01, 81 FR 63138, Sept. 14, 2016]
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                      |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------- | -
|                                      |  | State or OtherJurisdiction ofIncorporation |  | PercentageOwnership |  
|Parent                                |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.                |  | Maryland                                   |  |                    |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|Subsidiary (1)                        |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|The Patapsco Bank                     |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %
|                                      |  |                                           
|Subsidiaries of The Patapsco Bank (1) |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|PFSL Holding Corp.                    |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %
|                                      |  |                                           
|Prime Business Leasing                |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %
|                                      |  |                                           
|Patapsco Financial Services, Inc.     |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %



|(1) | The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements appearing in Item 7 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Enery

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-350-000]

Take notice that on June 8, 2000, Williston Basis Interstate Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing a request for waiver of the provisions of the electronic data interchange (EDI) processing requirements related to the Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB) Verion 1.4 standards, except those Capacity Release standards which are necessary to conduct data retrieval transactions.

Williston Basin states that it requests waiver of the following GISB Version 1.4 standards; Nominations standards 1.4.1 through 1.4.7; Flowing Gas standards 2.4.1 through 2.4.6; Invoicing standards  3.4.1 through 3.4.4; and Capacity Release standards 5.4.4, 5.4.6 through 5.4.12, and 5.4.18 through 5.4.19. In the alternative, Williston Basin states that it respectfully requests that the Commission grant the Company an extension of time to implement the GISB Version 1.4 EDI processing requirements until such time that a Part 284 customer, which pays for service on Williston Basin's system, requests that the Company offer such EDI transactions and fully executes a Trading Partner Agreement with Williston Basin.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 28, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the procedings. Any person wishing to become a party must gile a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16136  Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 302-17.62 What information do I put on my tax returns for Year 1 under the two-year process? ( a ) Your agency provides allowances to you, reimburses you for vouchers that you submit, and pays certain relocation vendors directly, all during the same calendar year, as described in subpart B of this part. Some of these reimbursements, allowances, and direct payments to vendors are taxable income to you, the employee. Your agency computes a WTA and reports that withholding to the IRS for each of these that is taxable. This is Year 1 of the two-year process.
( b ) If your agency makes the WTA optional to you and you have chosen not to receive the WTA, then your agency computes withholding tax for each taxable reimbursement, allowance, and direct payment, and reports that withholding to the IRS.
( c ) Shortly after the end of the calendar year, your agency provides one or more W-2 forms to you. At its discretion, your agency may include all of your taxable relocation expenses and WTA (if any) in one W-2, along with your regular payroll wages, or it may provide you one W-2 for your regular payroll wages and a separate W-2 for your taxable relocation expenses and WTA (if any).
( d ) At approximately the same time as your agency provides your W-2(s), it also may provide you an itemized list of all relocation benefits and the WTA (if any) for each benefit. You should use this statement to verify that your agency has included all covered taxable items in its calculations and to check your agency's calculations.
( e ) You must submit all W-2s that you have received with your Year 1 tax returns. On those returns, you must include all taxable relocation expenses during the previous year as income. Furthermore, you must include the WTA (if any) as tax payments that your agency made for you during the previous year, in addition to the regular withholding of payroll taxes from your salary.
[FTR Amdt. 2014-01, 79 FR 49645, Aug. 21, 2014, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2020-02, 84 FR 64783, Nov. 25, 2019]
§ 109-50.105 Equipment which may not be granted. Equipment which will not be granted include: ( a ) Equipment intended by the DOE institution for use in contractual research projects.
( b ) Furniture, such as desks, tables, chairs, typewriters, etc. (exception is such equipment that may be an essential component of and physically attached to an energy-related laboratory equipment system);
( c ) General supplies.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 122 (Friday, June 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15884]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 372-000]


Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

June 19, 2000.
    On June 12, 1998, Southern California Edison Company, licensee for 
the Lower Tule River Project No. 372, filed an application for a new or 
subsequent license pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the 
Commission's regulations thereunder. Project No. 372 is located on the 
North and South Forks of the Middle Fork Tule River in Tulare County, 
California.
    The license for Project No. 372 was issued for a period ending June 
14, 2000. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires 
the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year 
to year an annual license to the then licensee under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the 
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in Section 15 or any other 
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived 
the applicability of Section 15 of the FPA, then, based on Section 9(b) 
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth 
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations 
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or 
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to Section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 372 is issued to 
Southern California Edison Company for a period effective June 15, 
2000, through June 14, 2001, or until the issuance of a new license for 
the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. 
If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place 
on or before June 14, 2001, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 
CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to Section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Southern California Edison Company is authorized to 
continue operation of the Lower Tule River Project No. 372 until such 
time as the Commission acts on its application for subsequent license.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15884 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
468P13-3

#### State v. Donald Jay Young

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR (COAP15-745)

1. Dismissed

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

2. Dismissed as moot
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7217
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICKY LEE VANCE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-22) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 11, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky Lee Vance, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ricky Lee Vance appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for production of documents and his motion for the districtjudge to recuse himself. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Vance , No. CR-94-22 (W.D. Va. June 19, 2000). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 302-7.3 May HHG be transported or stored in more than one lot?

Household goods may be transported and stored in multiple lots, however, your maximum HHG weight allowance is based upon shipping and storing all HHG as one lot.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 834

To extend the authorization for the National Historic Preservation Fund,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Mr. HEFLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To extend the authorization for the National Historic

Preservation Fund, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESER4 VATION ACT.

5 The National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C.

6 470 and following; Public Law 89–665) is amended as fol7 lows:

8 (1) Section 101(e)(2) (16 U.S.C. 470a(e)(2)) is

9 amended to read as follows:
2

•HR 834 IH

1 ‘‘(2) The Secretary may administer grants to the Na2 tional Trust for Historic Preservation in the United

3 States, chartered by an Act of Congress approved October

4 26, 1949 (63 Stat. 947), consistent with the purposes of

5 its charter and this Act.’’.

6 (2) Section 102 (16 U.S.C. 470b) is amended

7 by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f) and

8 by redesignating subsection (d), as added by section

9 4009(3) of Public Law 102–575, as subsection (e).

10 (3) Section 107 (16 U.S.C. 470g) is amended

11 to read as follows:

12 ‘‘SEC. 107. Nothing in this Act shall be construed

13 to be applicable to the White House and its grounds, the

14 Supreme Court building and its grounds, or the United

15 States Capitol and its related buildings and grounds. For

16 the purposes of this Act, the exemption for the United

17 States Capitol and its related buildings and grounds shall

18 apply to those areas depicted within the properly shaded

19 areas on the map titled ‘Map Showing Properties Under

20 the Jurisdiction of the Architect of the Capitol,’ and dated

21 November 6, 1996, which shall be on file in the office of

22 the Secretary of the Interior.’’.

23 (4) Section 108 (16 U.S.C. 470h) is amended

24 by striking ‘‘1997’’ and inserting ‘‘2005’’.
3

•HR 834 IH

1 (5) Section 110(a)(1) (16 U.S.C. 470h–2(a)(1))

2 is amended by deleting the second sentence and in3 serting the following: ‘‘Prior to acquiring, construct4 ing, or leasing buildings for the purpose of carrying

5 out agency responsibilities, each Federal agency

6 shall, when operationally appropriate and economi7 cally prudent, give first consideration to historic

8 properties within historic districts. If no such prop9 erty is operationally appropriate and economically

10 prudent, then Federal agencies shall consider other

11 developed or undeveloped sites within historic dis12 tricts. Federal agencies shall then consider historic

13 properties outside of historic districts, if no suitable

14 site within a district exists. Any rehabilitation or

15 construction that is undertaken pursuant to this Act

16 must be architecturally compatible with the char17 acter of the surrounding historic district or prop18 erties.’’.

19 (6) The last sentence of section 212(a) (16

20 U.S.C. 470t(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘2000’’ and

21 inserting ‘‘2005’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of American Science & Engineering, Inc., a Massachusettscorporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledgeand belief, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2003 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Paul Theodore Owens                                                                                 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul  Theodore Owens  ExecutiveVice-President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer  November 13, 2003 |

 

----
No. 11-9440.

#### Ibanez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 301-71.213 Is the additional fee, which is the equivalent to any late payment charge that the card contractor would have been able to charge had the employee not paid the bill, considered income?

Yes, you must report this late payment fee as additional wages on Form W-2.

[FTR Amdt. 90, 65 FR 3058, Jan. 19, 2000]
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-049-AD

Costs:

Labor per airplane (4 work hour(s) x $85/hour) $340

Parts per airplane $ 0

Cost per airplane $340

Number of U.S.-registered airplanes 

x 3,060

Total fleet cost $27,540

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00058-CV

KENNETH RAY WALDROP APPELLANT

V.

TERESA WALDROP APPELLEE 

----------

FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2006-61054-393

----------

CONCURRING OPINION ON EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

----------

I agree with the majority that the Contractual Maintenance provision is 

purely contractual and that it can be modified by further court order absent one of 

the four specific circumstances contained under paragraph one of the provision. 

However, instead of directing the trial court on remand to determine the criteria to 

be applied in making any judicial modification authorized by the “further orders of 

the Court” language contained in the Contractual Maintenance provision, I would 
2

hold that the standard to apply in arriving at a “further order[] of the court” should 

be as follows: “Has there been a material change in Kenneth’s circumstances 

that warrants a modification of the contractual maintenance payment terms?” 

This standard is a lesser test than the “material and substantial change” 

mentioned in the trial court’s conclusion of law 8. Because the majority holds 

otherwise, I respectfully concur.

/s/ Bill Meier

BILL MEIER

JUSTICE

DELIVERED: June 7, 2018
#### § 102-76.40 To which real property actions does NEPA apply?

NEPA applies to actions that may have an impact on the quality of the human environment, including leasing, acquiring, developing, managing and disposing of real property.
#### § 102-83.105 Are Federal agencies required to give preference to historic properties when acquiring leased space?

Yes. Federal agencies must give a price preference to historic properties when acquiring leased space. See § 102-73.30 of this chapter for additional guidance.
No. 10-10945.

#### Hanson *v.*Thomas, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Chester, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Analogic Corporation (the
Company) for the quarter ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John J. Millerick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 5, 2009



| |  |  |  |                              
| |  |  |  | -----------------------------
| |  |  |  | /s/ John J. Millerick        
| |  |  |  |                              
| |  |  |  | John J. Millerick            
| |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
| |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)