alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 758 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 758

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2000

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                   For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO WIDOW'S INSURANCE BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of determining the eligibility of 
Nancy B. Wilson, the wife of Alphonse M. Wilson (Social Security No. 
271-18-9548), to widow's insurance benefits under section 202(e) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(e)), Nancy B. Wilson shall be deemed 
to have been married to Alphonse M. Wilson for a period of not less 
than 9 months immediately prior to the day on which Alphonse M. Wilson 
died.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) takes effect on March 21, 1991.
    (c) Payment.--Any benefits to which Nancy B. Wilson is entitled for 
the period prior to the date of the enactment of this Act shall be paid 
to her in a lump sum.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 4, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 26, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 26, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A23I0022. LAND-RON, INC. v. MONTE DAVIS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

18CV12153
§ 105-71.131 Real property. ( a ) *Title.* Subject to the obligations and conditions set forth in this section, title to real property acquired under a grant or subgrant will vest upon acquisition in the grantee or subgrantee respectively.
( b ) *Use.* Except as otherwise provided by Federal statutes, real property will be used for the originally authorized purposes as long as needed for that purpose, and the grantee or subgrantee shall not dispose of or encumber its title or other interests.
( c ) *Disposition.* When real property is no longer needed for the originally authorized purpose, the grantee or subgrantee will request disposition instructions from the awarding agency. The instructions will provide for one of the following alternatives. ( 1 ) *Retention of title.* Retain title after compensating the awarding agency. The amount paid to the awarding agency will be computed by applying the awarding agency's percentage of participation in the cost of the original purchase to the fair market value of the property. However, in those situations where a grantee or subgrantee is disposing of real property acquired with grant funds and acquiring replacement real property under the same program, the net proceeds from the disposition may be used as an offset to the cost of the replacement property.
( 2 ) *Sale of property.* Sell the property and compensate the awarding agency. The amount due to the awarding agency will be calculated by applying the awarding agency's percentage of participation in the cost of the original purchase to the proceeds of the sale after deduction of any actual and reasonable selling and fixing-up expenses. If the grant is still active, the net proceeds from the sale may be offset against the original cost of the property. When a grantee or subgrantee is directed to sell property, sales procedures shall be followed that provide for competition to the extent practicable and result in the highest possible return.
( 3 ) *Transfer of title.* Transfer title to the awarding agency or to a third-party designated/approved by the awarding agency. The grantee or subgrantee shall be paid an amount calculated by applying the grantee or subgrantee's percentage of participation in the purchase of the real property to the current fair market value of the property.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated January 24, 2017, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-214667) of Smart Trust 293,
comprising Smart Trust, Zacks GARP Composite 35 Trust, Series 12.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


January 24, 2017
Fw: EGU MACT -- Facilities expected to retire 12/15/2011 10:36 AM

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cortney -

Here are the projected retirements you requested.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division
Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

********************************************************* ----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/15/2011 10:36 AM

----- From: Erich Eschmann/DC/USEPA/US To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Mikhail Adamantiades/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sam Napolitano/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/15/2011 10:06 AM Subject: Re: Fw: EGU MACT -- Facilities expected to retire

Bob -- Attached spreadsheet lists all unit projected to withdraw as uneconomic in 2015 under MATS that were not projected to withdraw as
uneconomic in the base case.

Note that IPM projections are based on model plants that provide a highly detailed approximation of the fleet but do not fully replicate each unit. IPM model results are post-processed to disaggregate the projections inorder to present unit-level information. This procedure necessarily means that IPM modeling projections will not perfectly match a simple summation of post-processed unit-level results. EPA bases its regulatory impact analyses on IPM modeling projections at the system level and offers post-processed unit-level results to provide additional
information for context.

Erich Eschmann
Clean Air Markets Division U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation

202 343-9128 Phone
202 343-2359 Fax eschmann.erich@epa.gov

Projected Withdrawals_MATS Incremental from Base_12-15-11.xlsx
380P15

#### State v. Deonza Lamar Carmichael

Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Dismissed
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7028
DONALD MARSHALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUFUS FLEMINGS, Warden, Chief Warden of Nottoway Correction Center; DAVID ROBINSON, Assistant Warden of Nottoway Correction Center; KIM RUNION, Employee of Nottoway Correction Center, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-908-AM) Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 7, 1998 Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, app eals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Marshall v. Flemings , No. CA-97-908-AM (E.D. Va. June 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1601]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive Patent License

    Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFRs), which implements Public Law 96-517, the Department 
of the Air Force announces its intention to grant Thorgersen 
ElectroLuminescence Corporation, a company doing business in Woodbury, 
CT, an exclusive license in any right, title and interest the Air Force 
has in U.S. Patent No. 5,213,099. The inventor, Lloyd D. Tripp, was a 
government employee at the time of the invention. The invention is 
entitled ``Ear Canal Pulse/Oxygen Saturation Measuring Device'' and 
issued on May 25, 1993.
    The license described above will be granted unless an objection 
thereto, together with a request for an opportunity to be heard, if 
desired, is received in writing by the addressee set forth below within 
60 days from the date of publication of this Notice. Information 
concerning the application may be obtained, on request, from the same 
addressee.
    All communications concerning this Notice should be sent to Mr. 
Randy Heald, Associate General Counsel (Acquisition), SAF/GCQ, 1500 
Wilson Blvd., Suite 304, Arlington, VA 22209-2310. Mr. Heald can be 
reached at 703-588-5091 or by fax at 703-588-8037.

Janet A. Long,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-1601 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-U
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 774 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.774

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
      To amend the Small Business Act to change the conditions of 
  participation and provide an authorization of appropriations for the 
                    women's business center program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Women's Business Center Amendments 
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 29(c)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 656(c)(1)) is amended--
        (1) in subparagraph (A) by inserting ``and'' after the 
    semicolon at the end; and
        (2) by striking subparagraphs (B) and (C) and inserting the 
    following:
            ``(B) in the third, fourth, and fifth years, 1 non-Federal 
        dollar for each Federal dollar.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by this section shall apply 
beginning October 1, 1998.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 29(k)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(k)(1)) is 
amended by striking ``8,000,000'' and inserting ``11,000,000''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### § 302-7.103 How are the charges calculated when a carrier charges a minimum weight, but the actual weight of HHG, PBP&E and temporary storage is less than the minimum weight charged?

Charges for HHG, PBP&E and temporary storage are calculated based on the minimum weight charged by the carrier, but not to exceed 18,000 pounds.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         740,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  909,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,000
<PP&E>                                      33,214,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (13,656,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,569,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,133,000
<BONDS>                                      6,495,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       194,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,747,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,569,000
<SALES>                                      2,986,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,010,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,289,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             160,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                561,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    42,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            519,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   519,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
#### § 128-1.5002-3 Head of the Agency/Department.

The Attorney General of the United States.
#### § 128-1.8001 Background.

The Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977 (Act), 42 U.S.C. 7701, *et seq.,* as amended, directs the Federal government to establish and maintain an effective earthquake hazards reduction program to reduce the risks to life and property from future earthquakes. Executive Order 12699 implements certain provisions of the Act by requiring Federal agencies responsible for the design and construction of new buildings to develop and implement a seismic safety program. The regulations in this subpart implement the Executive Order, and apply to buildings designed and constructed under the responsibility of the Department of Justice. These regulations do not apply to buildings used by the Department and obtained, through purchase or lease, by the General Services Administration or other Federal agencies.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory P. Chandler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Gregory P. ChandlerChief Financial OfficerJuly 15, 2011
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-1277 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-155-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Modification 110.0

$9,350.0

0

$0 $9,350.00 44 $411,400.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $411,400

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q")
of Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the
"Company"), for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to his respective knowledge:

         1.       the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: November 14, 2002             /s/ Richard D. Parsons
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                     Richard D. Parsons
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.



Dated: November 14, 2002             /s/ Wayne H. Pace
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                     Wayne H. Pace
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.
# Comments on: 23-127: In Re CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39611-39612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2878-000]


St. Joseph Light & Power Company; Notice of Filing

June 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 12, 200, St. Joseph Light & Power company 
(SJLP), tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission a letter stating that SJLP's open access transmission tariff 
has been modified, effective May 1, 2000, to incorporate the Mid-
Continent Area Power Pool's Line Loading Relief (LLR) procedures 
proposed in Docket No. ER99-2649-002. SJLP's filing states further that 
the proposed LLR procedures incorporate the North American Electric 
Reliability Council's transmission loading relief (TLR) procedures for 
curtailments of non-firm transmission service.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's rules of practice 
and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before July 3, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to

[[Page 39612]]

intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16127 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M