alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0646

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

NELS JERRY PETERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Tamara Stuckey

is granted an extension of time to and including March 2, 2022, within 

which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. 

No further extensions will be granted without an affidavit from 

the Court Reporter.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 8 2022

02/08/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0646
#### § 301-53.6 Is a denied boarding benefit considered a promotional item for which I may retain compensation received from an airline whether voluntary or involuntary?

A denied boarding benefit (e.g., cash, free ticket coupon) is not a promotional item given by an airline. See the provisions of § 301-10.122 of this chapter when an airline denies you a seat (involuntary) and § 301-10.123 of this chapter when you vacate your seat (voluntary).

[FTR Amdt. 104, 67 FR 17947, Apr. 12, 2002, as amended by FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55706, Sept. 12, 2022]
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 858

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 17, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Code, to extend

coverage under the whistleblower protection provisions

of the District of Columbia Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 to personnel of the courts of the

District of Columbia.
2

HR 858 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia

5 Court Employees Whistleblower Protection Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION FOR PERSONNEL

7 OF THE COURTS OF THE DISTRICT OF CO8 LUMBIA.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 17 of

10 title 11, District of Columbia Code, is amended by adding

11 at the end the following new section:

12 ‘‘§ 11–1733. Whistleblower protection for court per13 sonnel

14 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, section

15 1503 of the District of Columbia Comprehensive Merit

16 Personnel Act of 1978 (DC Code, sec. 1–616.3) shall

17 apply to court personnel, except that court personnel may

18 institute a civil action pursuant to subsection (c) of such

19 section in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia

20 or the United States District Court for the District of Co21 lumbia.’’.

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

23 for subchapter II of chapter 17 of title 11, District of Co24 lumbia Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol25 lowing new item:

‘‘11–1733. Whistleblower protection for court personnel.’’.
3

HR 858 RFS

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect

3 as if included in the enactment of title XI of the Balanced

4 Budget Act of 1997.

Passed the House of Representatives March 16,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
#### § 301-10.2 What expenses are payable as transportation?

Fares, rental fees, mileage payments, and other expenses related to transportation.
***Exhibit 32.2***

 

***CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

 

Pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer ofAmerican Science & Engineering, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the“Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                                                     |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| *Paul Theodore Owens*                                    |
| *Vice-President, Treasurer and  Chief Financial Officer* |
|                                                     |
| *August 13, 2003*                                        |

 

1

----
# Comments on: 22-1316: THERMOLIFE INTERNATIONAL LLC v. HUMAN POWER OF N COMPANY [ORDER], Nonprecedential
#### § 301-50.5 What is my liability if I do not use my agency's TMS or the E-Gov Travel Service, and an exception has not been approved?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77027, Sept. 20, 2024.

If you do not have an approved exception under § 301-50.4 or § 301-73.104 of this chapter, you are responsible for any additional costs resulting from the failure to use the TMS or E-Gov Travel Service, including service fees, cancellation penalties, or other additional costs (e.g., higher airfares, rental car charges, or hotel rates). In addition, your agency may take appropriate disciplinary action.

[FTR Amdt. 2003-07, 68 FR 71029, Dec. 22, 2003, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61538, Oct. 31, 2007]
EX-10.30



 Exhibit 10.30 

AMENDMENT NO. 17 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This AMENDMENT NO. 17 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered as of the 12th day of December, 2016, between COMCAST CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania
corporation (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”), and BRIAN L. ROBERTS (“Employee”). 
 BACKGROUND 

WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2005, as amended (the “Agreement”), that sets
forth the terms and conditions of Employee’s employment with the Company, and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to further amend the
Agreement on the terms and conditions contained herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree
as follows: 
 1. Subparagraph 5(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following year and amount thereto: “Year — 2017;
Amount - $4,221,301.” Employee hereby elects January 2, 2020 as the scheduled payment date with respect to such amount, provided that Employee may elect to postpone such scheduled payment date to the extent permitted under the
Company’s 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan. 
 2. The Agreement is hereby amended to add a new subparagraph 14(g), to follow
subparagraph 14(f) and to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “(g) Nothing contained in this Agreement (including, without limitation,
subparagraphs 14(c) and 15(a)) or otherwise limits Employee’s ability to communicate directly with and provide information, including documents, not otherwise protected from disclosure by any applicable law or privilege, to the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) or any other federal, state or local governmental agency or commission regarding possible legal violations, without disclosure to the
Company. The Company may not retaliate against Employee for any of these activities, and nothing in this Agreement requires Employee to waive any monetary award or other payment that Employee might become entitled to from the SEC or OSHA.” 

3. Except as modified hereby, the Agreement shall continue unmodified and in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment No. 17 as
of the date first-above written. 
  

			
	COMCAST CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Arthur R. Block

		
	Date:	 	December 12, 2016
	
	EMPLOYEE:
	
	 /s/ Brian L. Roberts

	Brian L. Roberts
		
	Date:	 	December 12, 2016
# i«m-/¥ ELECTRONIC RECORD
CCA # 09-13-00367-CR 

## STYLE: Jimmy DonCaseyv. The
TRIAL COURT: 75th Distri TRIAL COURTS: CR29444 

### State ofTexas

ct Court Morefield 

### OFFENSE: Rape 

### PUNISHMENT: 30years 

## COUNTY: Liberty FOR REHEARING IS: MOTION 

## TRIALCOURT JUDGE: Judge Mark DATE: DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED JUDGE: DATE: 10-29-14 

### JUSTICE: LeanneJohnson PC NO S YES PUBLISH: NO CLK RECORD: 09-05-13 DNP: YES SUPPCLKRECORD: RPT RECORD: 09-11-13 SUPP RPT RECORD: STATE BR: 01-27-14 SUPP BR: APP BR: 12-13-13 PRO SE BR:



## IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

# m^n ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# APPELLANT*** Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# ReMe£ DATE: Q3lzSl<W/r JUDGE:
CCA IS: JUDGE: 

# fi(KL4iA*£-~, . MOTION FORREHEARING IN ON 

### CCA# Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP: 

### MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS: ON JUDGE:
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 334 Lower Tribunal No. 19

- CF

- 015448

_____________________________
R OBERT D WAYNE H ARRIS , Appellant

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County

. Robert Branning , Judge.

April 23, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

TRAVER
, C

. J. , and WHITE and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur.
Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig , II, Public Defender, and Richard J. D’Amico, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William Shelhart, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Filed 6/26/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2008 ND 119

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Jeffrey Schmeets, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20070360 & 20070361

Appeals from the District Court of Sheridan County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Robert O. Wefald, Judge.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

Per Curiam.

Walter Mathias Lipp (argued), State’s Attorney, 208 South Main Street, P.O. Box 590, McClusky, ND 58463-0590, for plaintiff and appellee.

Monty Jay Stensland (argued), 414 1⁄2 DeMers Avenue, Suite 12, Grand Forks, ND 58201, and Steven D. Motttinger (on brief), 15 9th Street South, Fargo, ND 58103-1830, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Schmeets

Nos. 20070360 & 20070361

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Jeffrey Schmeets appeals from the district court’s order revoking his probation because he violated the terms of his release.

[¶2]We affirm the order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4) because the district court’s findings of fact were not clearly erroneous and because the court did not abuse its discretion in revoking probation. However, we remand the order to the district court to correct two clerical errors.  Contrary to the order, Schmeets did not admit to the probation violations and he tested positive for methamphetamine rather than for marijuana.  

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring
No. 11-8892.

#### Morrow *v.*Humphrey, Warden.

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1619]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 25

[IB Docket No. 96-111; FCC 99-325]


Common Carrier Services: Satellite Communications--Earth Stations 
Operating with Non-U.S. Licensed Space Stations; Application 
Requirements

AGENCY:  Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION:  Final rule; announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This document announces the effective date of rules published 
in the Federal Register on November 15, 1999. They related to 
application requirements for earth stations communicating with non-U.S. 
licensed space stations.

EFFECTIVE DATES:  The amendments to 47 CFR 25.137 published at 64 FR 
61791 became effective on December 22, 1999.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Steven Spaeth, International Bureau, 
(202) 418-1539.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  
    1. On October 29, 1999, the Commission released a First Order on 
Reconsideration, a summary of which was published in the Federal 
Register. See 64 FR 61791, November 15, 1999. The First Order on 
Reconsideration streamlined the process established in the Commission's 
1997 DISCO II Order, by which non-U.S. licensed fixed-satellites 
providing service in the conventional C-and Ku-bands may serve the U.S. 
market. Because the amendments to 47 CFR 25.137 imposed modified 
information collection requirements, the amendments could not become 
effective until approved by the Office of Management and Budget 
(``OMB''), and no sooner than December 15, 1999. OMB approved these 
amendments on December 22, 1999.
    2. The Federal Register summary stated that the Commission would 
publish a document announcing the effective date of the rule changes 
requiring OMB approval. The amendments to 47 CFR 25.137 became 
effective on December 22, 1999. This publication satisfies the 
statement that the Commission would publish a document announcing the 
effective date of the rule changes requiring OMB approval.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 25

    Satellites.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1619 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### § 102-85.190 Can GSA Rent be adjusted when standard levels of service are performed by other customer agencies?

Customer agencies that arrange and pay separately for the costs of standard level services normally covered by GSA Rent will receive a Rent credit or other type of reimbursement by GSA for the amount GSA would have charged for such services. The type of reimbursement is at GSA's discretion. The reimbursement is limited to the amount included for the services in GSA Rent. Approval to perform or contract for such services must be obtained in advance by the customer agency from the appropriate GSA regional office.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 69

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit all individuals who are not citizens or nationals of the United States from making

contributions or expenditures in connection with elections for Federal

office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. BEREUTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

prohibit all individuals who are not citizens or nationals

of the United States from making contributions or expenditures in connection with elections for Federal office.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Illegal Foreign Con5 tributions Prohibition Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 69 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING ALL NON-CITIZEN INDIVIDUALS

2 FROM MAKING CONTRIBUTIONS OR EXPENDI3 TURES IN CONNECTION WITH ELECTIONS

4 FOR FEDERAL OFFICE.

5 (a) PROHIBITION APPLICABLE TO ALL INDIVIDUALS

6 WHO ARE NOT CITIZENS OR NATIONALS OF THE UNITED

7 STATES.—Section 319(b)(2) of the Federal Election Cam8 paign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441e(b)(2)) is amended by

9 striking the period at the end and inserting the following:

10 ‘‘, or in the case of an election for Federal office, an indi11 vidual who is not a citizen of the United States or a na12 tional of the United States (as defined in section

13 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act).’’.

14 (b) PROHIBITION APPLICABLE TO EXPENDITURES.—

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 319(a) of such Act

16 (2 U.S.C. 441e(a)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or ex17 penditure’’ after ‘‘contribution’’ each place it ap18 pears.

19 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 319

20 of such Act (2 U.S.C. 441e) is amended in the head21 ing by inserting ‘‘AND EXPENDITURES’’ after ‘‘CON22 TRIBUTIONS’’.
3

•HR 69 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

3 respect to contributions or expenditures made on or after

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
356P15

#### Terry Wayne Stephenson, II v. Terry L. Palmatier, Linda G. Wideman, Rachel M. Jones, Virginia Campbell Zalman, James F. Ray, and Judy T. Ray

1. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR (COA15-515)

1. Dismissed

2. Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for Petition for Preliminary Injunction

2. Dismissed
135	San	Lorenzo	Avenue,	Suite	770,	Coral	Gables,	Florida	33146

TEL 305.230.4884			FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/TORRES

OCTAVIO COLLADO, COLLECTIVE ACTION

For himself and all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC, AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

NOTICE OF CHARGING LIEN

Please take notice that FairLaw Firm asserts an attorney’s charging lien based upon legal 

services performed and costs incurred by the it in connection with the representation of Plaintiff, 

Octavio Collado, and the Opt-In Plaintiffs, in this action.

All interested or affected parties and persons are notified of this Charging Lien and of the

intent by the above law firm recover its attorney’s fees and advanced costs in this matter, as well as 

such other relief as the Court deems just, necessary, and proper against any recovery or proceeds 

obtained by Plaintiff(s) and/or Opt-In Plaintiffs.

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2024 Page 1 of 2
135	San	Lorenzo	Avenue,	Suite	770,	Coral	Gables,	Florida	33146

TEL 305.230.4884			FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

2

Dated this 13th day of February 2024

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2024 Page 2 of 2
§ 128-48.502 Procedures relating to claims. ( a ) Upon receipt of a claim, an investigation shall be conducted to determine the merits of the claim, and the investigation's report shall be submitted to the determining official.
( b ) The determining official shall be designated by the head of a bureau.
( c ) Upon receipt of a claim and the report thereon by the determining official, he shall make a ruling based upon the claim and the investigation's report.
( d ) Notice of the granting or denial of a claim for abandoned or other unclaimed property shall be mailed to the claimant or his attorney. If the claim is granted, the conditions of relief and the procedures to be followed to obtain the relief shall be set forth. If the claim is denied, the claimant shall be advised of the reason for such denial.
( e ) A request for reconsideration of the claim may be submitted within 10 days from the date of the letter denying the claim. Such request shall be addressed to the head of the bureau and shall be based on evidence recently developed or not previously considered.
§ 105-69.500 Secretary of Defense. ( a ) The Secretary of Defense may exempt, on a case-by-case basis, a covered Federal action from the prohibition whenever the Secretary determines, in writing, that such an exemption is in the national interest. The Secretary shall transmit a copy of each such written exemption to Congress immediately after making such a determination.
( b ) The Department of Defense may issue supplemental regulations to implement paragraph (a) of this section.
Order entered April 18 , 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00411-CV

IN RE: TRIANGLE SQUARE, LTD., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-04063-2012

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the motion to dismiss and 

DISMISS this petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this 

original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
§ 302-6.29 How long may I be authorized to claim TQSE reimbursement? ( a ) *TQSE-LP and TQSE-AE methods.* Your agency may initially authorize you to claim expenses in increments of 30 days or less, not to exceed 60 consecutive days. Your agency may authorize an extension of up to 60 additional consecutive days, for a maximum total of 120 consecutive days, if your agency determines that there is a compelling reason for you to continue occupying temporary quarters.
( b ) *TQSE-LS method.* If your agency offers, and you select TQSE-LS, your agency may authorize a lump sum for each day authorized up to a maximum of 30 consecutive days of TQSE; no extensions are allowed under the lump sum payment method. You will not receive additional TQSE reimbursement if the lump sum payment is not adequate to cover your actual TQSE.
No. 11-1202.

#### Jaensch *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET  AND  STATEMENT  INCOME  FOR ANCHOR NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S FORM
10-Q  FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    3645252000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              0
<EQUITIES>                                       0
<MORTGAGE>                               678908000
<REAL-ESTATE>                             24000000
<TOTAL-INVEST>                          5387981000
<CASH>                                   617187000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                  1132683000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          8477373000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                         5305354000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                           53361000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   3511000
<OTHER-SE>                               904467000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            8477373000
<PREMIUMS>                                       0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      106486000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                        (1769000)
<OTHER-INCOME>                           139403000
<BENEFITS>                                66744000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>               37932000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                      15444000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           82738000
<INCOME-TAX>                              29294000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       53444000
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              53444000
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          0


</TABLE>