alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CIK> 0000005588
<NAME> AMERICAN PAD & PAPER COMPANY
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,639                   1,639
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,708                  68,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (440)                   (440)
<INVENTORY>                                    144,867                 144,867
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               229,449                 229,449
<PP&E>                                         167,360                 167,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,592)                (20,592)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 620,335                 620,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,773                  86,773
<BONDS>                                        379,703                 379,703
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           274                     274
<OTHER-SE>                                     113,584                 113,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   620,335                 620,335
<SALES>                                        167,160                 316,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,160                 316,994
<CGS>                                          134,339                 253,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,065                 283,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (49)                   (121)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   168                     322
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,584                  17,795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,560                  15,815
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,852                   7,115
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,708                   8,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,708                   8,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16                     .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16109]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3265]


State of Texas

    Tarrant County and the contiguous counties of Dallas, Denton, 
Ellis, Johnson, Parker, and Wise in the State of Texas constitute a 
disaster area as a result of damages caused by severe thunderstorms and 
flooding that occurred on June 3-4, 2000. Applications for loans for 
physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the 
close of business on August 18, 2000 and for economic injury until the 
close of business on March 19, 2001 at the address listed below or 
other locally announced locations:

U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon 
Carter Blvd., Suite 102, Ft. Worth, TX 76155.

    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere..................     7.375
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere...............     3.687
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere..................     8.000
  Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit           4.000
   Available Elsewhere........................................
  Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit          6.750
   Available Elsewhere........................................
For Economic Injury Businesses and Small Agricultural              4.000
 Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The numbers assigned to this disaster are 326511 for physical 
damage and 9H5500 for economic injury.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008).

    Dated: June 19, 2000.
Kris Swedin,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-16109 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
28 January 2016

001P16

#### State v. Ronald Farrow

1. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-583)

1. Denied

2. Defs Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*To Review Order of Superior Court of New Hanover County

2. Denied
MEMORANDUM

Date: October 28 , 2015

Subject: October 27, 2015, meeting with NEDA/CAP

From: Greg Nizich, EPA/OAQPS/ AQPD / NSRG

To: EPA Docket ID: EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 20 14

- 0 6 16

I. PURPOSE

This memorandum documents an October 27, 2015, discussion between Ms. Janet

McCabe, Acting Assistant Administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency ’s (EPA)

Office of Air and Radiation and Ms. Leslie Ritts of the National Environmental Development

As sociation’s Clean Air Project (NEDA/CAP)

.

II. DATE

The meeting occurred from 3:15 pm to 4:00 pm EDT on October 27, 2015, at the William

Jefferson Clinton Federal Building in Washington, DC

.

III. SUMMARY OF DI SC USSION

At the end of a meeting held with Ms. McCabe and NEDA/CAP members primarily to discuss

ozone implementation ideas and the Clean Power Plan, Ms. Ritts brought up some concerns to

Ms. McCabe regarding the EPA’s proposed amendments to the Regional Consistency regulat ions

and noted that NEDA/CAP had submitted comments on the proposed changes.
#### § 302-3.210 What is an overseas tour of duty?

An overseas tour of duty is an assignment to a post of duty outside the continental United States, Alaska or Hawaii.
# Comments on: 22-1987: ANALOG DEVICES, INC. v. XILINX, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential
423P15

#### State v. Clyde Gary Whisenant

1. Def’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-607)

1. Allowed 12/30/2015

2. Def’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*

Ervin, J.,

recused
#### § 105-55.024 Consideration of tax consequences to the Government.

In negotiating a compromise, the General Services Administration (GSA) may consider the tax consequences to the Government. In particular, GSA may consider requiring a waiver of tax-loss-carry-forward and tax-loss-carry-back rights of the debtor. For information on discharge of indebtedness reporting requirements see § 105-55.030.
500 P.2d 905

#### Terrell WITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Arizona, ex rel. Frank A. EYMAN, Warden, Arizona State Prison, Appellee.

No. 2 CA-CIV 1236.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Sept. 12, 1972.

Terrell Witt, in pro per.

Gary K. Nelson, Atty. Gen., Phoenix, by Howard L. Fell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tucson, and James P. F. Egbert, Certified Third Year Law Student under Rule 28(e), for appellee.

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

A summary denial of appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is the *121subject of this appeal. We do not concern ■ourselves with the question of whether habeas corpus was the appropriate vehicle for •seeking the requested relief since the ■courts of this State look to substance rather than to form. State ex rel. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles v. Superior Court, 12 Ariz.App. 77, 467 P.2d 917 (1970), supplemental opinion, 12 Ariz.App. 228, 469 P.2d 120.

The facts alleged in the petition filed below are as follows. On two separate occasions the petitioner requested the Board of Pardons and Paroles to place him on parole. He was heard on both occasions and .at the conclusion of the hearings was given written notice of denial of parole. He ■claimed that he was denied due process of law in that the Board did not permit him • or afford him an opportunity to examine his file and failed to state its reason for ■denying parole. On appeal it is contended that the summary denial of the petition was error.

 We find no error in the lower ■ court’s summary disposition since no hearing is required when the petition, on its face, shows that the petitioner, as a matter •of law, is not entitled to relief. Landers v. State ex rel. Eyman, 7 Ariz.App. 197, 437 P.2d 681 (1969) ; Hunt v. Eyman, 429 F.2d 1318 (9th Cir. 1970). Parole is a matter of grace and not of right. State v. Howland, 103 Ariz. 250, 439 P.2d 821 (1968) ; State ex rel. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles v. Superior Court, supra.

We are of the opinion that the parole board is not required to disclose its reasons for denial of parole. Williams v. United States, 327 F.Supp. 986 (D.C.N.Y. 1971) ; Madden v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 438 F.2d 1189 (3d Cir. 1971); Mastriana v. New Jersey Parole Board, 95 N.J.Super. 351, 231 A.2d 236 (1967);1 Curtis v. Bennett, 256 Iowa 1164, 131 N. W.2d 1 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 958, 85 S.Ct. 1096, 13 L.Ed.2d 974. The lower court was clearly correct in declining to interfere with prison administration.

Affirmed.

HATHAWAY and HOWARD, JJ., concur.

1

. In the 1971 decision of Monks v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 58 N.J. 238, 277 A.2d 193 (1971), the New Jersey Supreme Court declared invalid a state parole board rule that it would not reveal the basis for denial of parole either in the notice of denial or otherwise. The court expressed the view that not only would the furnishing of reasons for denial provide the requisite fairness but it would further the goal of rehabilitation. We do not believe that this ease is apposite since it dealt with a rule which prescribed a general policy.
No. 10-11123.

#### Carter *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 101-4.500 Employment. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) No person shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination in employment, or recruitment, consideration, or selection therefor, whether full-time or part-time, under any education program or activity operated by a recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
( 2 ) A recipient shall make all employment decisions in any education program or activity operated by such recipient in a nondiscriminatory manner and shall not limit, segregate, or classify applicants or employees in any way that could adversely affect any applicant's or employee's employment opportunities or status because of sex.
( 3 ) A recipient shall not enter into any contractual or other relationship which directly or indirectly has the effect of subjecting employees or students to discrimination prohibited by §§ 101-4.500 through 101-4.550, including relationships with employment and referral agencies, with labor unions, and with organizations providing or administering fringe benefits to employees of the recipient.
( 4 ) A recipient shall not grant preferences to applicants for employment on the basis of attendance at any educational institution or entity that admits as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if the giving of such preferences has the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Application.* The provisions of §§ 101-4.500 through 101-4.550 apply to: ( 1 ) Recruitment, advertising, and the process of application for employment;
( 2 ) Hiring, upgrading, promotion, consideration for and award of tenure, demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, application of nepotism policies, right of return from layoff, and rehiring;
( 3 ) Rates of pay or any other form of compensation, and changes in compensation;
( 4 ) Job assignments, classifications, and structure, including position descriptions, lines of progression, and seniority lists;
( 5 ) The terms of any collective bargaining agreement;
( 6 ) Granting and return from leaves of absence, leave for pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, leave for persons of either sex to care for children or dependents, or any other leave;
( 7 ) Fringe benefits available by virtue of employment, whether or not administered by the recipient;
( 8 ) Selection and financial support for training, including apprenticeship, professional meetings, conferences, and other related activities, selection for tuition assistance, selection for sabbaticals and leaves of absence to pursue training;
( 9 ) Employer-sponsored activities, including social or recreational programs; and
( 10 ) Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
DAVEE' LEE MALONE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5701

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 2, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark J. Borello, Judge.

Davee' Lee Malone, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 301-52.2 What information must I provide in my travel claim? You must provide the following: ( a ) An itemized list of expenses and other information (specified in the listing of required standard data elements contained in appendix C of this chapter, and any additional information your agency may specifically require), except: ( 1 ) You may aggregate official travel-related expenses incurred at the TDY location for authorized telephone calls, transit system fares, and parking meter fees, except any individual expenses costing over $75 must be listed separately;
( 2 ) When you are authorized lodgings-plus per diem, you must state the M&IE allowance on a daily basis;
( 3 ) When you are authorized a reduced per diem, you must state the reduced rate your agency authorizes on a daily basis; and
( 4 ) When your agency limits M&IE reimbursement to the prescribed maximum M&IE for the locality concerned, you must state the reduced rate on a daily basis.
( 5 ) Your agency may or may not require itemization of M&IE when reimbursement is limited to either the maximum M&IE locality rate or a reduced M&IE rate is authorized.
( b ) The type of leave and the number of hours of leave for each day;
( c ) The date of arrival and departure from the TDY station and any non-duty points visited when you travel by an indirect route other than a stopover to change planes or embark/disembark passengers;
( d ) A signed statement, “I hereby assign to the United States any rights I may have against other parties in connection with any reimbursable carrier transportation charges described herein,” when you use cash to pay for common carrier transportation.
[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15969, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended at FTR Amdt. 2010-02, 75 FR 24436, May 5, 2010]
084P15-3

#### State v. Curtis Louis Sangster

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

*1.*

2. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

*2.*

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

3. Denied 11/25/2015
##### 



Exhibit 8

(PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO)

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPChartered Accountants
One Lombard Place, Suite 2300
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Canada R3B 0X6
Telephone +1 (204) 926 2400
Facsimile +1 (204) 944 1020

December 23, 2003





Consent of Independent Auditors

We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of CanWest
Global Communications Corp. of our report dated October 31, 2003 relating to
the consolidated financial statements of CanWest Global Communications Corp. as
of August 31, 2003 and 2002 and for the years ended August 31, 2003 and 2002.

(-s- PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP)

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants





PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited,
each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
No. 10-11109.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
                          REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or
                    RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          (AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


           I, Floyd Warkol, as Chief Executive Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 29, 2005


                                                     /s/ Floyd Warkol
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Floyd Warkol
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-11058.

#### Toure *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 122 (Friday, June 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39221-39222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15968]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub No. 5) (2000-3)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the third quarter 2000 rail cost 
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The third quarter 2000 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.050. 
The third quarter 2000 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.588. The third quarter 2000 
RCAF-5 is 0.569.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H. Jeff Warren, (202) 565-1533. TDD 
for the hearing impaired: (202)565-1695.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DA<bullet> TO<bullet> DA OFFICE 
SOLUTIONS, Suite 210, 1925 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20423-0001, 
telephone (202) 289-4357. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is

[[Page 39222]]

available through TDD services (202) 565-1695.]
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Decided: June 19, 2000.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Burkes, and 
Commissioner Clyburn.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15968 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGT8N, D.C.

IN THE MATTER OF AIR AMBULANCE BY AIR TREK, INC. FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1003 (FAA Enforcement Docket 2009EA030037) (Civil Penalty Action) Ronnie A. Yoder, ChiefAdministrative LawJudge



### RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF HEARING REQUEST PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that AIRAMBULANCE BYAIR TREK, INC., Respondent herein, by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to the Rules ofPractice (14 C.F.R. Part 

### 13), hereby withdraws its request for a hearing in this matter. The parties have agreed to a resolution ofthis matter. As a result, a hearing onthe merits is no longer necessary. 

### WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that the above-captioned matter be terminated withprejudice. Dated this 2nd day ofMarch 2016. Respectfully submitted,

Gregmy 

### 8. W\nton)Esq. The Avitltion Law

## 9-!rn; 1997 Annapoli&Exchange Parkway, Suite 300 A1mapolis, MD 21401 Tel: (301) 294-8550 Fax: (301) 294-2525 Email: Greg(iilAviationLawExperts.com 

### Counsel for RespondentCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this day, copies ofthe foregoing Notice ofWithdrawal ofHearing Request were placed inthe United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Original and one copy Federal Aviation Administration Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 The Honorable Ronnie 

### A. Yoder (also by fax) Chief Administrative Law Judge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 (FAX: 202 366-7536) Christian 

### L. Lewerenz Esq. Office ofthe Regional Counsel FAAEastern Region, AEA-7 One Aviation Plaza, Room 561 Jamaica, NY 11434 christian.lewerenz@faa.gov MatthewJ. Zappala Attorney Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division, Northeast Team 1200 District Avenue Burlington, MA 01803 Matthew.Zapnala(a)faa.gov Date: March 2, 2016 Gregory S:'Winton, Esq. The Aviation Law Firm 1<;97 Annapoiis Exchange Parkway, Suite 300 Annapolis, MD 21401 Tel: (301) 294-8550 Fax: (301) 294-2525

2
§ 302-9.7 What POV transportation and emergency or temporary storage may my agency authorize at Government expense? Your agency may authorize the following POV transportation and emergency or temporary storage at Government expense: ( a ) Transportation of a POV to a post of duty as provided in subpart B of this part.
( b ) Transportation of a POV from a post of duty as provided in subpart C of this part.
( c ) Transportation of a POV within CONUS as provided in subpart D of this part.
( d ) Emergency storage of a POV as provided in subpart E of this part.
( e ) Storage of a POV during a TCS in support of a contingency operation.
[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated and amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-06, 76 FR 71889, 71890, Nov. 21, 2011]