alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 101-39.401 Reporting of accidents. ( a ) The operator of the vehicle is responsible for notifying the following persons immediately, either in person, by telephone, or by facsimile machine of any accident in which the vehicle may be involved: ( 1 ) The manager of the GSA IFMS fleet management center issuing the vehicle;
( 2 ) The employee's supervisor; and
( 3 ) State, county, or municipal authorities, as required by law.
( b ) In addition, the vehicle operator shall obtain and record information pertaining to the accident on Standard Form 91, Motor Vehicle Accident Report. Only one copy of the Standard Form 91 is required. When completed, the Standard Form 91 shall be given to the vehicle operator's supervisor. The vehicle operator shall also obtain the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any witnesses and, wherever possible, have witnesses complete Standard Form 94, Statement of Witness, and give the completed Standard Form 94 and other related information to his or her supervisor. The vehicle operator shall make no statements as to the responsibility for the accident except to his or her supervisor or to a Government investigating officer.
( c ) Whenever a vehicle operator is injured and cannot comply with the above requirements, the agency to which the vehicle is issued shall report the accident to the State, county, or municipal authorities as required by law, notify the GSA IFMS fleet manager of the center issuing the vehicle as soon as possible after the accident, and complete and process Standard Form 91. A complete copy of the accident report shall be forwarded to the appropriate GSA office as outlined in the vehicle operator's packet.
[51 FR 11023, Apr. 1, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 59891, Nov. 26, 1991; 58 FR 65291, Dec. 14, 1993]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15133]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ID-933-1430-AG; IDI-14515 C]


Termination of Desert Land Entry Classification, Idaho

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice terminates a non-suitable Desert Land Entry 
Classification on 10 acres, so the land can be patented under Section 
206 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 15, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine D. Foster, BLM Idaho State 
Office, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709, 208-373-3863.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 1, 1981, 10 acres were classified 
as non-suitable for Desert Land Entry. The classification is hereby 
terminated and the segregation for the following described lands is 
hereby terminated:

T. 17 N., R. 23 E., B.M.
Section 12: S\1/2\S\1/2\NW\1/4\SE\1/4\.

    The area described above aggregates 10 acres in Lemhi County.

    At 9 a.m. on June 15, 2000, the Desert Land Entry classification 
identified above will be terminated. The lands will remain closed to 
location and entry under the public land laws and the general land 
laws, as the lands are currently segregated for exchange.

    Dated: June 9, 2000.
Jimmie Buxton,
Branch Chief, Lands and Minerals.
[FR Doc. 00-15133 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
Order filed December 8, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00668

- CV

____________ SHELLY R. ROWLANDS , Appellant

V. BRADLEY J. HARTZOG AND TOMBALL FOREST EXPRESS, LLC , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 82895



### O R D E R Appellant’ s brief was due November 30, 2020

. No brief or motion for extension of time has been filed. Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or
before December 30, 2020 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Christopher, Wise, and Hassan.
No. 11-9590.

#### Kelly *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations (CFRs), which implements Public Law 96-517, the Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant Thorgersen ElectroLuminescence Corporation, a company doing business in Woodbury, CT, an exclusive license in any right, title and interest the Air Force has in U.S. Patent No. 5,213,099. The inventor, Lloyd D. Tripp, was a government employee at the time of the invention. The invention is entitled “Ear Canal Pulse/Oxygen Saturation Measuring Device” and issued on May 25, 1993. 

The license described above will be granted unless an objection thereto, together with a request for an opportunity to be heard, if desired, is received in writing by the addressee set forth below within 60 days from the date of publication of this Notice. Information concerning the application may be obtained, on request, from the same addressee. 

All communications concerning this Notice should be sent to Mr. Randy Heald, Associate General Counsel (Acquisition), SAF/GCQ, 1500 Wilson Blvd., Suite 304, Arlington, VA 22209-2310. Mr. Heald can be reached at 703-588-5091 or by fax at 703-588-8037. 

Janet A. Long, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-1601 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-U
Exhibit 99.5



Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 (Section 906) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of CanWest Global Communications Corp. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:



The Companys Annual
Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005 (the Form 40-F), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form
40-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: | November 30, 2005
|------ | -----------------

/s/ Leonard AsperName: Leonard AsperTitle:   Chief Executive Officer




|Dated: | November 30, 2005
|------ | -----------------

/s/ John MaguireName: John MaguireTitle:   Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99(b)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                         OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB
                         OF PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002


The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.
(the "Issuer"). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of the Issuer for the annual period ended December 31, 2002.

I, Michael R. Sayre, certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and that information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc., and will be retained by Pinnacle Data
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This certification is executed as of March 25, 2003.



                                        /s/ Michael R. Sayre
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Chief Financial Officer
AUSTUU. -msxaus 

October 22, 1948 

Hon. E. Ii. Poteet 3. .Act,lng President 

Texas Colleges of Arts & Industries 

Kingsville, Texas 

Attention: Hon. James H. Calvin 

Opinion No. V-705. 

Dear Sir: 

Re: The authority of the Hoard of 

Directors of Texas College ‘of 

Arts and Industries to permit 

an employee to take a State.. 

automobile Into Mexico on official business. 

Your request for an opinion reads as follows: 

*m thh ~O&%tk & Directors of the 

Texas Colleg& of Arts and Industries authorize.~~.;;erhpToyee”..~f :the College to take 

a state-owned automobile Into Mexico on 

off iclal business?” 

,Nelther the current appropr$atlon bill making 

appropriations to the Texas College of Arts and Industries and other educational Institutions for the current 

biennium (H.B. 246, Acts 50th Leg. ch. 339, p. 6491, nor 

any general law which we have been able to find, prohibits the use of a state-owned automobile by an officer 

or employee of an educational Institution when traveling 

without the State on institutional business. 

Subsectl;n 6 of House Bill 246, among other 

things provides: No travel shall be performed 

outside of the Stati,‘e;cept upon the written consent of 

the schoo&‘s board of regents or directors.tl 

Therefore, it is the oplnion,of this office 

that there is no legal objection to an employee of the 

College using a state&owned automobile on a trip to Mexico on official business for the College, provided he 

obtains in advance the written consent of the Board of 

Directors of the College. 
Hon. E. H. Poteet, Page 2 (V-705) 

SUMMARY 

An employee of Texas College of Arts 

& Industries may use a State-owned automobile on a trip to Mexico on official business for the College, provided he obtains 

in advance the written consent of its 

Board of Directors. Subsection 6 of H. B. 

246, Acts 1947, 50th Legislature, at page 

649. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

WB:wb 

BY 

Bruce W. .Bryant 

Assistant
15 December 2015

284P15

#### Francisco K. Avoki and Ekoko K. Avoki v. Larry Eugene Ferebee, Jr., Does I-XX (Unknown), and Intervenor Government Employees Insurance

1. Pits’ *Pro Se*Motion for Notice of Appeal (COA15-484)

1. Dismissed *ex mero*mote

2. Pits’ *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court of Mecklenburg County

2. Denied

8. Pits’ *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

3. Allowed

Ervin, J.,

recused
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT NO. 11

                       ANALYSTS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                              September 30
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT                                    -----------------------
PER SHARE AMOUNTS)                                         1996           1995
                                                           ----           ----
PRIMARY:

Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding                                        14,652         14,528

Dilutive stock options after application
of treasury stock method                                     245            232
                                                          ------         ------

Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding                      14,897         14,760
                                                          ------         ------
                                                          ------         ------

Net income                                               $ 3,868        $ 2,809
                                                          ------         ------
                                                          ------         ------

Per share amount                                         $   .26        $   .19
                                                          ------         ------
                                                          ------         ------

FULLY DILUTED:

Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding                                        14,652         14,528

Dilutive stock options based on the treasury
stock method using the end of the period market
price, if higher than average market price                   323            268
                                                          ------         ------

Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding                      14,975         14,796
                                                          ------         ------
                                                          ------         ------

Net income                                               $ 3,868        $ 2,809
                                                          ------         ------
                                                          ------         ------

Per share amount                                         $   .26        $   .19
                                                          ------         ------
                                                          ------         ------


Adjusted to reflect the 2 for 1 common stock split in the form of a stock
dividend distributed September 30, 1996.
#### § 302-6.200 How should we administer the TQSE allowance?

Temporary quarters should be authorized only if, and only for as long as necessary until the employee and the employee's immediate family can move into permanent residence quarters. You must administer the TQSE allowance to minimize or avoid other relocation expenses.
Argued and submitted April 27,

convictions affirmed; remanded for entry of corrected judgment June 28, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*BEACHER FLOYD NOBLE, *Appellant.*

(CF 93-0695; CA A82754)

896 P2d 617

Irene B. Taylor, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Stephanie S. Andrus, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*382PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for robbery in the first degree, assault in the fourth degree, and menacing. ORS 164.415; ORS 163.160; ORS 163.190. We affirm his convictions without discussion and remand for entry of a corrected judgment.

Defendant argues, and the state concedes, that the trial court should have imposed a 36-month, rather than 60-month, term of post-prison supervision, pursuant to OAR 253-05-002(2)(c). Although defendant did not object when the trial court verbally imposed the 60-month term, he requests that we exercise our discretion to review the unpreserved claim of error. *See*ORAP 5.45(2).

The circumstances of this case are identical to those in *State v. Jones,*129 Or App 413, 879 P2d 881 (1994). The error is apparent on the face of the record and, for the reasons discussed in *Jones,*we exercise our discretion to review it. We remand for entry of a corrected judgment deleting the 60-month term of post-prison supervision and imposing a 36-month term.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for entry of corrected judgment.
No. 10-11117.

#### Inda-Lares *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.32

 

2017 CASH INCENTIVE PLAN

 

Purpose:

 

The terms of the 2017 Cash Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) have been established to reward the executives and other employees of Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for assisting the Company in achieving its operational goals through exemplary performance. Under the Plan, cash bonuses, if any, will be based on both the achievement of corporate goals and a review of personal performance, which is determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) and/or the Board of Directors (the “Board”).  The overarching intent in setting and achieving the goals is to build long-term shareholder value.

 

Determination of 2017 Cash Bonuses:

 

Target bonuses for participants in the Plan will range from 5% to 60% of such recipient’s 2017 base salary, with a range for executives of 40% to 60% of such executive’s 2017 base salary. The maximum bonus that a participant will be eligible to receive is 120% of such participant’s 2017 base salary and in no event will a bonus be paid later than March 15 of the year following the year in which the bonus was earned. The objective Company performance goals for each participant will be based on meeting certain goals with respect to the Company’s financial and operational performance: management of the NDA for ITP from submission through the review process (weighted at 60%), preparing for commercial readiness (weighted at 10%), expanding potential uses for fostamatinib in other indications such as IgAN and AIHA (weighted at 10%), expanding the Company’s pipeline with an IND-ready (or equivalent) molecule  (weighted at 10%), and maintaining a viable cash position for the Company at December 31, 2017 (weighted at 10%), as well as other Company performance goals to be determined by the Compensation Committee. The Board and Compensation Committee reserve the right to modify these goals and criteria at any time or to grant bonuses to the participants even if the performance goals are not met, as well as to withhold bonuses if a minimum threshold of 40% of the goals are not met.
#### § 302-2.4 What is my effective transfer or appointment date?

Your effective transfer or appointment date is the date on which you report for duty at your new or first official station, respectively.
§ 302-3.220 May my family and I travel to another U.S. location (other than from my actual place of residence) under my tour renewal agreement? Yes, you and your family may travel to another U.S. location (other than from your actual place of residence) under your tour renewal agreement. However, your agency will only reimburse you for the amount of authorized expenses from your post of duty to your actual place of residence and return (as appropriate) on a usually traveled route. Note to § 302-3.220 :
If your actual place of residence is located in the U.S., you and your family must spend a substantial amount of time in the U.S. in order to receive reimbursement.
388A10

#### State v. Andrew Darrin Ramseur (DEATH)

1. Def’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court of Iredell County

1. Allowed

2. Def’s Motion to Maintain Stay of Direct Appeal

2. Allowed 06/10/2015
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DENNIS L. FLOYD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D21-1303

September 24, 2021

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit 

Court for Hillsborough County; Michael S. Williams, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jones v. State, 569 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 1990).

CASANUEVA, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
No. 11-9587.

#### Doles *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 11-8959.

#### Bobo *v.*Fresno County Dependency Court.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 07-19-00268-CR

Josue Julio Garica-Morales Appellant From the 47th District Court of Potter County v. June 21, 2021 The State of Texas Appellee § § § § Opinion Per Curiam J U D G M E N T Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated June 21, 2021, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that have already been paid are adjudged. It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance. o O o
No. D-2667.

#### In re Discipline of Shimer.

Robert W. Shimer, of Camp Hill, Pa., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 11-9271.

#### Hawk *v.*White, Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 302-12.10 What are the income tax consequences if I use a relocation services company?

You may incur income taxes on relocation services provided by a relocation services company and paid for by your agency. Section 82 of the Internal Revenue Code states there shall be included in gross income (as compensation for services) any amount received or accrued, directly or indirectly, by an individual as a payment for or reimbursement of expenses of moving from one residence to another residence which is attributable to employment. You will receive a relocation income tax (RIT) allowance if your agency determines that such expenses are taxable. The Government does not assume responsibility for payment of your taxes, however, and you may wish to consult a tax professional on income tax reporting.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18343, Apr. 1, 2011]
No. 11-9051.

#### Pearson *v.*Louisiana.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–640

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 2559, THE AGRICULTURE

RISK PROTECTION ACT OF 1999

MAY 25 (legislative day, MAY 24), 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and

ordered to be printed

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 512]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 512, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference

report to accompany H.R. 2559, the Agriculture Risk Protection Act

of 1999, and against its consideration. The rule provides that the

conference report shall be considered as read.

Æ