alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 10/8/24 P. v. Keo CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CHANTY KEO

,

Defendant and Appellant. D083243

(Super. Ct. No. SCD200761 )

APPEAL from a n order of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Yvonne E. Campo s , Judge. Affirmed.

Rex Adam Williams

, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for

Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

In 2007, a jury convicted Chanty Keo of attempted premeditated

murder (Pen

. Code

, 1 §§ 187 , subd. (a), 664) and found Keo personally

discharged a firearm causing great bodily injury ( § 12022.53, subd. (d) )

. The jury also convicted him of robbery ( § 211) and found other sentence

1 A ll statutory references are to the Penal Code

.2

enhancements to be true. The court sentenced Keo to life in prison

plus 27 years.
Keo appealed and this court affirmed the judgment in an unpublished

opinion

. ( People v

. Keo (Aug. 25, 2008, D051784). )

In 2023, Keo filed a petition for resentencing under section 1172.6.

The court appointed counsel, received briefing, reviewed the record of

conviction and jury instructions

, and held a hearing. The court found Keo

was the sole participant in the crime and personally inflicted the injury to the

victim. The court found the jury was not instructed on any theory of liability

that was disapproved by section 1172.6. Accordingly, the court found Keo

was ineligible for relief and denied the petition without first issuing an order

to show cause or holding an evidentiary hearing.

Keo filed a timely notice of appeal.

Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v

. Delgadillo

(2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 ( Delgadillo ) indicating counsel has not been able to

identify any potentially meritorious issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel

asks the court to exercise its discretion to independently review the record for

error. We notified Keo that he could file his own brief on appeal, but he has

not responded.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The facts of the offenses were discussed in our original appeal in this

case. We will not repeat them here.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted

, appellate counsel has filed a Delgadillo brief and

asks the court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.

Although Keo has not submitted any briefing to support his appeal, we have

independently reviewed the record for error. Our review has not identified3

any potentially meritorious issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel

has represented Keo on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order denying Keo’s petition for resentencing under section 1172.6

is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

IRION, J.

KELETY, J.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 3623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1568]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 1

RIN 3038-AB50


Proposed Revision of the Commission's Procedures for the Review 
of Contract Market Rules

AGENCY:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION:  Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  On November 26, 1999, the Commodity Futures Trading 
Commission (``Commission'') published in the Federal Register a request 
for public comment on a proposal to revise its procedures for the 
review of contract market rules and rule amendments (64 FR 66428). The 
original comment period expires January 25, 2000. By letter dated 
January 3, 2000, seven agricultural organizations requested a thirty 
day extension of the comment period to permit the membership of each 
organization to fully consider the implications of the proposed 
procedures.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The request was made in a January 3, 2000 letter jointly 
signed by the American Farm Bureau Federation, the American Soybean 
Association, the National Association of Wheat Growers, the National 
Cattlemen's Beef Association, the National Corn Grower's 
Association, the National Farmers Union, and the National Pork 
Producers Council.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has determined to extend the comment period for 
thirty days in order to insure that an adequate opportunity is provided 
for submission of meaningful comments.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  Written comments must be received on or before 
February 24, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  Comments on the proposal should be sent to Jean A. Webb, 
Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette 
Center, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581. Comments may be 
sent by facsimile transmission to (202) 418-5521, or by e-mail to 
secretary @cftc.gov. Reference should be made to ``Procedure for the 
Review of Contract Market Rules''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  David P. Van Wagner, Associate 
Director, Division of Trading and Markets, Commodity Futures Trading 
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, 
DC 20581. Telephone Number: (202) 418-5490. Facsimile Number: (202) 
418-5536. Electronic Mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b3f260b282d3f28652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1c5dcf1d2d7c5d29fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on January 18, 2000 by the 
Commission.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-1568 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 302-17.42 Which state marginal tax rate(s) does my agency use to calculate the CMTR if I incur tax liability in more than one state, and how does this affect my RITA and my state tax return(s)?

If two or more states that are involved in your relocation impose an income tax on relocation benefits, then your relocation benefits may be taxed by both states. Most commonly, your old and new duty stations are in the two states involved. The following table lays out the possibilities:

| If: | But: | Your agency will use the following as the state marginal tax rate in the CMTR: | Your RITA will include an appropriate allowance for: | Your action: |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Only one involved state has a state income tax | | The marginal tax rate of the one state that taxes income | Taxes you incur in that state | You pay the taxes required by the state that taxes income. |
| Each involved state taxes a different set of your relocation benefits, with no overlap | | The average of the marginal tax rates for each state involved | Taxes you incur in all involved states | You file tax returns in each involved state and pay the applicable taxes. |
| Two or more involved states tax some of your same relocation benefits | All involved states *allow* you to adjust or take a credit for income taxes paid to other states | The marginal tax rate of the state that has the highest state income tax rate | Taxes you incur in all involved states | You file tax returns in each involved state, take the appropriate credits and/or adjustments, and pay the applicable taxes. |
| Two or more involved states tax some of the same relocation benefits | One or more involved states *does not allow* you to adjust or take a credit for income taxes paid to other states | The sum of all applicable state marginal tax rates | Taxes you incur in all involved states | You file tax returns in each involved state, and pay the applicable taxes. This may result in paying taxes in more than one state on the same relocation benefits. |
---

---

Exhibit 10.1

CONSENT OF REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Registration Nos. 333-11842, 333-9352, 333-11154, 333-13686, 333-111112 and 333-111113)
and on Form F-3 (Registration Nos. 333-12996, 333-12350, 333-109766 and 333-127883) of our
report dated February 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
NICE-Systems Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2005.

|Tel-Aviv, IsraelMay 17, 2006 |  | /s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERERA Member of Ernst & Young Global
|---------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM

GRACE, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF MIAMI,

Defendant.

/

JOINT NOTICE OF FILING

DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS WITH DESIGNATIONS 

Plaintiffs and Defendant jointly file this notice of filing the following deposition transcripts

with designated testimony highlighted. Plaintiffs’ designations are highlighted in orange; 

Defendant’s designations are highlighted in cyan.

1. Christina White

2. Todd Hannon

3. Larry Spring

4. Stephen Cody

Respectfully submitted January 29, 2024,

/s/ Nicholas L.V. Warren

Nicholas L.V. Warren (FBN 1019018)

ACLU Foundation of Florida

1809 Art Museum Drive, Suite 203

Jacksonville, FL 32207

(786) 363-1769

nwarren@aclufl.org

Daniel B. Tilley (FBN 102882)

Caroline A. McNamara (FBN 1038312)

ACLU Foundation of Florida

4343 West Flagler Street, Suite 400

GrayRobinson, P.A.

By: /s/ George T. Levesque

GrayRobinson, P.A.

Jason L. Unger (FBN 991562)

George T. Levesque (FBN 55551)

Andy Bardos (FBN 822671)

301 South Bronough Street, Suite 600

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 577-9090

Christopher N. Johnson (FBN 69329)

Christopher.Johnson@gray-robinson.com

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/29/2024 Page 1 of 2
2

Miami, FL 33134

(786) 363-2714

dtilley@aclufl.org

cmcnamara@aclufl.org

Gregory P. Luib*

Dechert LLP

1900 K Street NW

Washington, DC 20006

(202) 261-3413

gregory.luib@dechert.com

Neil A. Steiner*

Julia Markham-Cameron*

Dechert LLP

iree Bryant Park

1095 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036

(212) 698-3822

neil.steiner@dechert.com

julia.markham-cameron@dechert.com

Christopher J. Merken*

Dechert LLP

Cira Centre

2929 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19104

(215) 994-2380

christopher.merken@dechert.com

*Admitted pro hac vice

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Marlene Quintana, B.C.S. (FBN 88358)

Marlene.Quintana@gray-robinson.com

Fabian A. Ruiz (FBN 117928)

Fabian.Ruiz@gray-robinson.com

Sydney M. Feldman (FBN 1017798)

Sydney.Feldman@gray.robinson.com

Jessica D. Santos (FBN 1038776)

Jessica.Santos@gray-robinson.com

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 3200

Miami, FL 33131

(305) 416-6880

City of Miami

Office of the City Attorney

Victoria Mendez, City Attorney (FBN 194931)

John A. Greco, Chief Deputy City Attorney

(FBN 991236)

Kevin R. Jones, Deputy City Attorney (FBN 

119067)

Kerri L. McNulty, Litigation & Appeals 

Division Chief (FBN 16171)

444 S.W. 2nd Avenue

Miami, FL 33130

(305) 416-1800

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/29/2024 Page 2 of 2
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: November 24, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Region 7, EPA

SUBJECT: September 25, 2014, Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

Karl Brooks and Amy Bhesania of EPA gave a summary presentation on September 25, 

2014, for a Weather and Climate Class at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. The majority 

of the presentation centered on highlighting the four major building blocks in the Carbon Power 

Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed 

on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

EPA Region 7:

Karl Brooks

Amy Bhesania

Other Attendees included students enrolled in 

the Weather and Climate Class - attendee list 

not available.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 704 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 704

                    For the relief of Walter Borys.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1999

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Walter Borys.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM.

    (a) Waiver of Time Limitation.--The Secretary of the Army shall 
consider the claim described in subsection (b) without regard to the 
time limitation established by section 2734(b)(1) of title 10, United 
States Code, or any predecessor time limitation applicable at the time 
the claim accrued.
    (b) Claim Described.--The claim referred to in subsection (a) is 
the claim filed against the United States at Fort Hamilton, New York, 
on June 30, 1993, by Mr. Walter Borys, of Lakeview Avenue, Yonkers, New 
York, pertaining to the murder of his father, Mr. Eustach Borys, on 
June 13, 1946, in Kempten, Germany.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15983]



[[Page 39407]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 19, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President), 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
19105-1521:
    1. Penn Woods Bancorp, Williamsport, Pennsylvania; to acquire up to 
19.9 percent of the voting shares of Columbia Financial Corporation, 
Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania, and thereby acquire First Columbia Bank & 
Trust, Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 20, 2000.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-15983 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING,
INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,699
<PP&E>                                           3,529
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,207
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,834
<SALES>                                         26,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,053
<CGS>                                           16,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    37
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,799
<INCOME-TAX>                                       719
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
#### § 301-10.113 What is my liability for unauthorized use of a non-contract carrier when contract service is available and I do not meet one of the exceptions for required use?

You are responsible for any additional costs or penalties incurred by you resulting from unauthorized use of non-contract service.

[FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55704, Sept. 12, 2022]
§ 102-76.20 What issues must Federal agencies consider in providing site planning and landscape design services? In providing site planning and design services, Federal agencies must— ( a ) Make the site planning and landscape design a direct extension of the building design;
( b ) Make a positive contribution to the surrounding landscape;
( c ) Consider requirements (other than procedural requirements) of local zoning laws and laws relating to setbacks, height, historic preservation, and aesthetic qualities of a building;
( d ) Identify areas for future building expansion in the architectural and site design concept for all buildings where an expansion need is identified to exist;
( e ) Create a landscape design that is a pleasant, dynamic experience for occupants and visitors to Federal facilities and, where appropriate, encourage public access to and stimulate pedestrian traffic around the facilities. Coordinate the landscape design with the architectural characteristics of the building;
( f ) Comply with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.,* and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 470 *et seq.,* for each project; and
( g ) Consider the vulnerability of the facility as well as the security needs of the occupying agencies, consistent with the Interagency Security Committee standards and guidelines.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                     ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            Financial Data Schedule
                        Quarter Ended December 31, 1998
                                 (in thousands)

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1998 and the consolidated
statement of earnings for the quarter ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000003327
<NAME>                                         ALBERTO-CULVER
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         45,720
<SECURITIES>                                   909
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                   9,848
<INVENTORY>                                    375,694
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               570,632
<PP&E>                                         412,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                 189,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,048,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          287,436
<BONDS>                                        170,544
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15,031
<OTHER-SE>                                     528,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,048,905
<SALES>                                        464,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               464,551
<CGS>                                          228,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               203,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,352
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                29,438
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,818
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            18,620
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   18,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .32
        


</TABLE>