alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: April 28, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MARCO FIMBRES 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2015 - 0204 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") filed a Complaint dated 

February 19, 2015. Marco Fimbres, (hereinafter "Respondent") tiled a Request for 

Hearing dated January 26, 2015. We served our Procedural Order on March 3, 2015. 

On April 8, 2015, the FAA filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. 

Respondent has failed to file an Answer to the Complaint, failed to tile a response 

to our Procedural Order and failed to respond to the Agency's Motion for Judgment on 

the Pleadings. 

WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

1. On or before May 15, 2015, Respondent shall file a response to this Order 

stating why the relief requested in the Agency's Motion should not be granted; and 

2. On or before May 15, 2015, Respondent shall answer the Complaint; and 

3. On or before May 15,2015, Respondent shall fully comply with our 

Procedural Order; and · 

4. Absent full and complete responses to paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 hereinabove, 

Respondent may be sanctioned including, but not limited to, allegations in the Complaint 

may be deemed admitted; and/or Respondent may be precluded from introducing any 

evidence at the hearing other than his own testimony; and/or Respondenfs Request for 

Hearing may be dismissed; and/or a Default Judgment may be entered against 

Respondent in the full amount of the fine requested by the Agency in its Complaint. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI 000 1 

Marco A. Fimbres, Respondent 

4444 East Benson Highway, Trir 21 

Tucson, AZ 85706 

Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

ONE COPY 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, A WP-7 .6 

Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7117 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (EII-31 0) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-20 15-0204 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each
      of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report
                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
                Company.



































_________________________


Robert
      A.
      Paul


Chairman
      and


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      7,
      2007
***Exhibit 32.1***

* *

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE18, UNITED STATES CODE

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant toSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of AmericanScience & Engineering, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certifythat to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1.                                       theCompany’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004(“10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Company’s 10-Q being filed fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany

 

Date: July 22, 2004

 

 
|   | Anthony R.  FabianoPresident and Chief Executive  Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Science &Engineering, Inc. and will be retained by American Science &Engineering, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
No. 11-9427.

#### Scholz *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32**
Certification Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with this quarterly report of American Greetings Corporation on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), each of theundersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of AmericanGreetings Corporation.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to American Greetings Corporation and will be retained by AmericanGreetings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request. September 30, 2004 /s/ Zev WeissZev WeissChief Executive Officer /s/ Robert P. RyderRobert P. RyderSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
39
§ 303-70.700 When an employee dies as a result of personal injury sustained while in the performance of the employee's law enforcement duties, either on official travel duties away from the official station, or at the current official station, must we provide transportation for the employee's immediate family, baggage, and household goods to a alternate residential destination? Yes. If the head of the agency concerned (or a designee) determines that the employee died as a result of personal injury sustained while in the performance of the employee's duties, and the employee was: ( a ) A law enforcement officer as defined in 5 U.S.C. 5541;
( b ) An employee in or under the Federal Bureau of Investigation who is not described in paragraph (a); or
( c ) A Customs and Border Protection officer as defined in 5 U.S.C. 8331(31).
AFS-14-006-E December 20, 2013

Exemption No. 37301 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0886

Mr. Adam Holling Parent of Payton Holling 16733 Washington Street Omaha, NE 68135

Dear Mr. Holling:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received October 17, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Payton Holling for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Payton to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Payton.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Payton Holling an exemption from § 121.311(b). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Payton is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to allow him to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Payton’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Payton Holling may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Payton’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on December 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Barbagallo Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: December 11, 2014 105797 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF 

NEW YORK, 

Respondent, 

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RALPH HAROLD JR., Also Known 

as ESSENCE HAROLD, 

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: November 21, 2014

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Carl J. Silverstein, Monticello, for appellant.

D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan

Gudesblatt of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Devine, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County

(Williams, J.), rendered February 6, 2013, convicting defendant

upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sexual act in

the first degree.

In satisfaction of a five-count indictment, defendant

pleaded guilty to criminal sexual act in the first degree. Under

the terms of the plea agreement, defendant was to be sentenced to

15 years in prison, followed by 15 years of postrelease

supervision. At sentencing, County Court imposed a prison term

of 15 years with 20 years of postrelease supervision. Defendant

appeals.
-2- 105797 

Defendant's contention that the period of postrelease

supervision imposed did not conform to the plea agreement is not

preserved for our review given defendant's failure to object at

the time of sentencing (see People v Wright, 89 AD3d 1232, 1232

[2011]). Nevertheless, because the record demonstrates that

County Court specifically committed to sentence defendant to a

15-year-period of postrelease supervision, we will exercise our

interest of justice jurisdiction and modify the sentence imposed

by sentencing defendant to the agreed-upon 15 years of

postrelease supervision (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]). We note that

since County Court found the agreed-upon sentence to be

appropriate, "defendant need not be provided an opportunity to

withdraw his plea as our modification gives effect to the promise

which had originally induced defendant's plea" (People v Wright,

89 AD3d at 1233 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]).

To the extent that defendant challenges the agreed-upon

sentence as harsh and excessive, we find no extraordinary

circumstances nor an abuse of discretion so as to warrant a

reduction of the negotiated sentence in the interest of justice

(see People v Davis, 114 AD3d 1003, 1004 [2014], lv denied 23

NY3d 962 [2014]). Finally, even if defendant's challenge to the

effectiveness of his counsel were preserved for our review (see

People v Wasley, 119 AD3d 1216, 1216 [2014]), we would find it to

be without merit as the record demonstrates that defendant was

provided with meaningful representation (see People v Cancer, 16

AD3d 835, 839-840 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 826 [2005]).

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.
-3- 105797 

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of

discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the period of

postrelease supervision to 15 years, and, as so modified,

affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
#### § 301-75.204 May we use Government contractor-issued travelers checks to pay for the interviewee's travel expenses?

No.
No. 10-11085.

#### Lua-Bermejo *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.



































_________________________


Robert A.
Paul


Chairman
and


Chief
Executive Officer


August 4,
2008
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11.1


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             Fiscal Year Ended
                                                                  ----------------------------------------
                                                                   March 28,     March 29,      March 30,
                                                                     1998           1997           1996
                                                                  ----------     ----------     ----------
<S>                                                               <C>            <C>            <C>       
            Basic earnings per share:
                  Weighted average shares outstanding                  8,863          8,709          6,673
                                                                  ==========     ==========     ==========

                  Net  income                                     $      629     $      449     $    5,655
                                                                  ==========     ==========     ==========

                  Basic earnings per share                        $     0.07     $     0.05     $     0.85
                                                                  ==========     ==========     ==========

            Diluted earnings per share:
                  Weighted average shares outstanding                  8,863          8,709          6,673

                  Common stock equivalents: stock options (1)            669            866            738
                                                                  ----------     ----------     ----------
                                                                       9,532          9,575          7,411
                                                                  ==========     ==========     ==========

                  Net income                                      $      629     $      449     $    5,655
                                                                  ==========     ==========     ==========

                  Diluted earnings per share                      $     0.07     $     0.05     $     0.76
                                                                  ==========     ==========     ==========
</TABLE>


     (1)  Stock options based on the treasury stock method using average market
          price.
FY 2021 Q1 FOIA Quarterly Report

Agency

Corporation for National and Community Service

Reporting Quarter

2021 Q1

10 Oldest Requests

Did your agency have 10 or more perfected requests pending at the end of the last fiscal year? If so, please select 

the number 10. If your agency had fewer than 10, please select the correct number.

5

Of the ten or fewer requests identified in your previous response, please select the number of requests your 

agency has closed during the current fiscal year.

2

FOIA Requests Information

Component Requests Received in Requests Processed Requests Backlogged as of

Reporting Quarter in Reporting Quarter End of Reporting Quarter 

CNCS 15 7 8
June 11, 2015

Mr. Kevin Condrey

509 State Street Marion, NC 28752

Dear Mr. Condrey:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 26, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1915), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Editorial Note on Part 96
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 96 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010, and by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014.

§ 96.310 Who does this subpart apply to? This subpart applies: ( a ) If you are a responsible person who owns a vessel(s) registered in the U.S. and engaged on a foreign voyage(s), or holds certificates or endorsement of such voyages;
( b ) If you are a responsible person who owns a vessel(s) registered in the U.S. and volunteer to meet the standards of this part and Chapter IX of SOLAS;
( c ) To all foreign vessels engaged on a foreign voyage, bound for ports or places under the jurisdiction of the U.S., and subject to Chapter IX of SOLAS; or
( d ) If you are a recognized organization authorized by the U.S. to complete safety management audits and certification required by this part.
#### § 102-192.5 What does this part cover?

This part prescribes policy and requirements for the effective, economical, and secure management of incoming, internal, and outgoing mail and materials in Federal agencies.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allis Chalmers Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Munawar
H. Hidayatallah, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By       /s/ Munawar H. Hidayatallah
         --------------------------------------
         Munawar H. Hidayatallah
         President, Chief Executive Officer and
         Chairman

         August 14, 2002
Executive Committee Charter

Article I. PURPOSE
The Executive Committee is a standing committee of the Board of Directors (“the Board”) of the
Corporation for National and Community Service (“the Corporation”), designated by the
Chairperson of the Board pursuant to authority granted in Section 2.11 of the Bylaws of the
Board. The purpose of the Executive Committee is to act on behalf of the full Board as needed
between meetings.
Article Il. COMPOSITION
The Committee shall be composed of the Chairperson of the Board, the Vice Chairperson of the
Board, and the Chairs of the other standing Committees.
Article III. AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Section 3.01 Authority

The Executive Committee shall have, and may exercise, all authority of the Board in
administering the Corporation, so far as may be permitted by law.

Section 3.02 Responsibilities
The Executive Committee’s responsibilities include:
1. Consider issues on behalf of the full Board between meetings on time-sensitive issues
requiring full Board involvement when necessary; and
2. Providing consultation when necessary regarding day-to-day operational issues of the
Corporation.

Article IV. RESOURCES

The CEO shall provide the Committee with support as necessary and shall ensure cooperation
with requests made by the Committee for necessary information.

Article V. MEETINGS AND REPORTS
Section 5.01 Meetings:

The Committee shall meet as needed between Board meetings, as determined by the Chairman of
the Board.


Section 5.02 Reports:

The Committee shall keep a record of all of its acts and proceedings and shall report thereon at
the next Board meeting or call.
§ 301-70.700 Must our employees use a Government contractor-issued travel charge card for official travel expenses? Yes, your employees must use a Government contractor-issued travel charge card for official travel expenses unless: ( a ) A vendor does not accept the travel charge card;
( b ) The Administrator of General Services has granted an exemption. (see § 301-70.704); or
( c ) Your agency head or their designee has granted an exemption.
[FTR Amdt. 90, 65 FR 3056, Jan. 19, 2000, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12252, Feb. 16, 2024]