alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                            Exhibit 10(iii)(A)3


                Summary of Actions Relating to Change in Control


On October 23, 2000, the Board of Directors of AT&T Corp. ("AT&T") approved
board resolutions (incorporated by reference of Exhibit (10)(iii)(A)(32) to
Form 10-K for 2000, File No. 1-1105) adopting change in control provisions to
various AT&T plans and programs (collectively, as further amended subsequent to
the date of such resolutions, the "Plans"). The Plans were amended to provide
enhanced benefits to participants whose employment is terminated under certain
circumstances within two years following a change in control. The definition of
"Change in Control" used in these amendments was the definition contained in
the AT&T 1997 Long Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(iii)(A)(12) to Form 10-K for 1999, File No. 1-1105).

On February 23, 2004, the Board of Directors of AT&T adopted, subject to
shareholder approval, the AT&T 2004 Long Term Incentive Program that, among
other things, includes a definition of "Change in Control" that differs from
the definition that appears in the AT&T 1997 Long Term Incentive Program. At
the AT&T annual meeting on May 19, 2004, the AT&T shareholders approved the
AT&T 2004 Long Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to Form S-8 filed on May 26, 2004, File No. 1-1105).

Subsequent to the AT&T shareholders meeting, officers and internal benefits
committees of AT&T, with the concurrence of the Chairman of the Compensation
and Employee Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors, took various actions
the effect of which was to further amend the Plans to substitute the definition
of "Change in Control" contained in the AT&T 2004 Long Term Incentive Program
for the definition of "Change in Control" contained in the AT&T 1997 Long Term
Incentive Program.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-62386-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

BRIAN WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SIXT RENT A CAR. LLC,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, filed on 

May 18, 2023 [DE 18], and Plaintiff Brian Wright (“Plaintiff”)’s Motion Asking for More Time 

[DE 23], filed on May 26, 2023. The Court has carefully considered the Motions [DE’s 18, 23] 

and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. 

On May 18, 2023, the Court entered an Order deferring ruling on the Motion to 

Withdraw as Counsel until June 1, 2023 to allow Plaintiff an opportunity to file objections to the 

Motion. See [DE 20]. The Court stated that failure to timely file objections would result in the 

granting of the Motion. See id. No response to the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel was filed. 

However, on May 26, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Motion Asking for More Time, stating that he 

wanted more time to find a lawyer to replace his lawyer who withdrew as counsel. See [DE 23].

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motion to Withdraw as Counsel [DE 18] is GRANTED. Gilberto E. Sanchez 

Case 0:22-cv-62386-WPD Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2023 Page 1 of 2
is discharged from further responsibility to Plaintiff Brian Wright in connection 

with this action.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion Asking for More Time [DE 23] is DENIED. In the absence of 

Plaintiff obtaining new counsel and having said counsel file a Notice of 

Appearance, the Court will assume that Plaintiff is representing himself pro se.

3. By separate Order, the Court will issue a copy of the Court’s Instructions to Pro 

Se Litigants to Plaintiff.

4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at the 

address below.

 DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 

2nd day of June, 2023.

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Brian Wright

115 NE 2nd Terrace

Hallandale, FL 33009

Case 0:22-cv-62386-WPD Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.2
	 	 
	 	 


 


February 1, 2017


 


Jonathan Rich


Evansville, IN


 


Dear Jon:


 


On behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”),
I am pleased to confirm the following offer:


 


Position:
Your position will be Executive Chairman of the Board. Your duties and responsibilities
as Executive Chairman will be prescribed from time to time by the Board. The effective date of your appointment to this new role
will be February 6, 2017. The term of your appointment to this position will be one year; provided, that upon request of the Board,
you agree to resign from the position. This position is not eligible for severance benefits.


 


Salary: Your base salary will
be $19,230.77 paid bi-weekly (which would be an annual rate of $500,000).


 


Bonus Program: You will remain
a participant in the Executive Bonus Program. The targeted bonus for your position is an amount equal to 65% of your base annual
salary. Your actual bonus will be determined by individual and company performance. The bonus is paid annually. Your 2017 bonus
will be prorated based on your effective date and your final year’s bonus will be pro-rated for time worked (and paid at
the usual time).


 


Financial Planning and Tax Preparation
Fees: You will continue to be eligible to receive reimbursements for financial planning and tax preparation fees in an
amount not to exceed $15,000 per year, subject to your providing proper documentation to the Company. Reimbursements will be made
promptly following submission of proper documentation, but in no event later than the end of the year following the year in which
the expenses are incurred. This reimbursement is not subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit.


 


Existing Employment Agreement:
You have requested, and the Company has agreed effective February 6, 2017, to terminate the Employment Agreement dated October
1, 2010.


 


Again, we are pleased to extend this opportunity
to you and know you will continue to make significant contributions to the organization. Please sign below as acceptance of our
offer and your agreement to the terms and conditions hereof including the attached Confidentiality, Inventions and Restrictive
Covenant Agreement. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 812-306-2202 with any questions.


 


	Sincerely, 	 
	 	 
	/s/ Edward Stratton	 
	 	 
	Edward Stratton	 
	EVP – Human Resources	 


 


		Cc:	Jason Greene



EVP & Chief Legal Officer


 


I accept this offer with the terms and conditions
as outlined above:


 


	/s/ Jonathan D. Rich	 	02/01/2017
	Jonathan D. Rich	 	Date
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 748 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.748

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Act that established the Keweenaw National Historical Park 
to require the Secretary of the Interior to consider nominees of various 
     local interests in appointing members of the Keweenaw National 
                  Historical Park Advisory Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPOINTMENTS TO KEWEENAW NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ADVISORY 
              COMMISSION.

    Section 9(c)(1) of the Act entitled ``An Act to establish the 
Keweenaw National Historical Park, and for other purposes'' (Public Law 
102-543; 16 U.S.C. 410yy-8(c)(1)) is amended by striking ``from 
nominees'' each place it appears and inserting ``after consideration of 
nominees''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
No. 10-11049.

#### Weeden *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 302-7.400 What policies and procedures must we establish for this subpart? You must establish policies and procedures as required for this subpart, including who will: ( a ) Administer your household goods program;
( b ) Authorize commuted rate or actual expense for transportation and payment for HHG, PBP&E, and temporary storage;
( c ) Authorize PBP&E to be transported as an agency administrative expense in accordance with FTR guidelines (usually the authorizing official for PBP&E will be at the employee's new official station);
( d ) Authorize an employee to ship UAB;
( e ) Collect any excess costs or charges;
( f ) Advise the employee on the Government's liability for any personal property damage or loss claims (*See* 31 U.S.C. 3721, *et seq.*);
( g ) Ensure that international HHG shipments by water are made on ships registered under the laws of the United States whenever such ships are available (*see* The Cargo Preference Act of 1904 (10 U.S.C. 2631) and The Cargo Preference Act of 1954 (46 U.S.C. 55302));
( h ) Authorize temporary storage in excess of the initial 60-day limit for CONUS shipments or 90-day limit for OCONUS shipments; and
( i ) Ensure pre-payment audits are completed.
#### § 109-38.902 Records.

The Office of Management and OPMOs for their respective organizations shall establish adequate records for accounting and reporting purposes.
#### § 302-5.17 Am I in a duty status when I perform a househunting trip?

Yes, you are in a duty status when you perform a househunting trip.
§ 109-48.101-6 Transfer to other Federal agencies. ( a ) - ( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Transfer orders for forfeited or voluntarily abandoned distilled spirits, wine, and malt beverages for medicinal, scientific, or mechanical purposes or any other official purposes for which appropriated funds may be expended by a Government agency shall be forwarded through normal administrative channels for signature by the DPMO and for subsequent forwarding to GSA for release.
( e ) [Reserved]
( f ) Transfer orders for reportable forfeited drug paraphernalia shall be forwarded through normal administrative channels for signature by the Property Executive and for subsequent forwarding to GSA for approval.
#### § 301-70.807 Must we make information available to the public about travel by senior Federal officials and non-Federal travelers on Government aircraft?

Yes, an agency that authorizes travel on Government aircraft must make records about travelers on those aircraft available to the public in response to written requests under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), except for portions exempt from disclosure under that Act (such as classified information).
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-261-CV

JOHN LESLIE MILLER	APPELLANT

	V.

SOUTHWESTERN EXPOSITION & 						APPELLEES 

LIVE STOCK, FREMONT INDUSTRIAL 

INSURANCE GROUP, EXECUTIVE 

DEPUTY WORKERS COMPENSATION, 

AND TEX WORKER’S COMPENSATION 

COMMISSION

	------------

	FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On July 24, 2007, appellant John Leslie Miller filed a “Notice of Appeal” in his suit to confirm an arbitration award.  However, the trial court clerk has informed this court that no written order or judgment has been signed in the underlying case.  Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal is premature.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 27.1(a).  A prematurely filed notice of appeal is not effective until the appellate deadline is triggered and therefore does not vest this court with jurisdiction over the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 27.1(a).

	On July 27, 2007, we notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction and gave appellant fifteen days to correct this defect in the record.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3, 44.4(a)(2).  Appellant has not tendered or filed any signed orders from the trial court and has not shown grounds for continuing the appeal.  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).	

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DELIVERED: September 13, 2007
NEWS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

           FRED A. ALLARDYCE, SENIOR EXECUTIVE OF AMERICAN STANDARD'S

                         MEDICAL BUSINESS GROUP, RESIGNS

         Piscataway, New Jersey - November 4, 1999 - American Standard announced
today that Fred A.  Allardyce,  Senior Vice  President of American  Standard and
Business  Leader of the Medical  Systems  Group,  has  resigned  his position to
pursue other interests. Allardyce has led the Medical Systems Group since it was
established in 1997. American Standard announced its intent to sell the business
in October, and is actively engaged in preparations to sell the business.

         American Standard,  with annual sales exceeding $7 billion, is a global
manufacturer  with  market  leading  positions  in three  principal  businesses:
TRANE(R),  the nations' leading  supplier of central air conditioning  equipment
for  commercial  and  institutional  buildings  and  the  primer  brand  for the
residential buildings;  AMERICAN STANDARD(R) AND IDEAL STANDARD(R),  the world's
largest manufacturer of plumbing products; and WABCO(R), the leading supplier of
electronic  braking  and  control  systems  to  the  world's   manufacturers  of
heavy-duty trucks and buses. The Company employs  approximately 57,000 people in
33 countries. American Standard is included in the Standard & Poor's MidCap 400.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lisa Glover (732) 980-6048  (Press Inquiries)
Ray Pipes (732) 980-6095 (Analyst Inquiries)

THE  LATEST  NEWS   RELEASE   AND   CORPORATE   INFORMATION   CAN  BE  HEARD  ON
1-888-ASD-NEWS.  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON AMERICAN STANDARD IS AVAILABLE ON THE
COMPANY'S WORLDWIDE WEB SITE AT HTTP://WWW.AMERICANSTANDARD.COM
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7244

DUAN L. WILLIAMS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. H.W. CLARKE, Dir. Va. D.O.C. , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. ( 2:17

- cv - 00564

- MSD

- RJK )

Submitted : December 1, 2021 Decided: January 4, 2022

Before KING and QUATTLEBUAM , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
Robert L. Sirianni, Jr. , BROWNSTONE, P.A. , Winter Park, Florida, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circu it.2 PER CURIAM:
Duan L. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Williams ’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge iss ues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on th e merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court de nies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (201 2) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HASSAN BIN ATTASH, Petitioner , v. BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., Respondents

. Civil Action No. 05-1592 (RCL)

ORDER Upon consideration of Respondents’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with this Court’s Order of July 24, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondents’ motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Respondents have until August 6, 2009 to produce the approximately 230 responsive documents that Respondents have located in the consolidated assemblages of the files of JIG and OARDEC and have already submitted for clearance. It is further ORDERED that Respondents have until August 17, 2009 to implement a more robust search capability for the Task Force database. It is further ORDERED that Respondents have until August 31, 2009 to complete targeted searches for responsive Task Force information and submit all responsive material to the clearance team.

8/3/2009 Date Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth United States District Judge / s /
013P15-2

#### George T. Powell, Jr. v. George R. Brown, et al.

Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for Reconsideration

Dismissed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CHILDTIME LEARNING CENTERS, INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 2,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           APR-2-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-4-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-2-1999
<CASH>                                           5,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                       255
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,426
<PP&E>                                          46,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,727
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,836
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,611
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,963
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (360)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,161
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,065
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,096
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,096
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93


</TABLE>
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-268-CV

IN RE RONALD J. HOLLEMAN RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is

of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 21, 2009
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 560

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘JoseComercio and San Justo Streets, in San Juan,States courthouse located at the intersection of

 ́ V. Toledo Federal

Building and United States Courthouse’’.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 560

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at the intersection of Comercio and San

Justo Streets, in San Juan, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Jose ́

V. Toledo Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 560 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at the intersection of Comercio and San Justo

6 Streets, in San Juan, Puerto Rico, shall be known and

7 designated as the ‘‘Jose ́ V. Toledo Federal Building and

8 United States Courthouse’’.

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

12 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec13 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jose ́ V.

14 Toledo Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 882

AN ACT

To nullify any reservation of funds during fiscal

other purposes.qualified beginning farmers or ranchers, and forsolidated Farm and Rural Development Act foryear 1999 for guaranteed loans under the Con-
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 882

AN ACT

To nullify any reservation of funds during fiscal year 1999

for guaranteed loans under the Consolidated Farm and

Rural Development Act for qualified beginning farmers

or ranchers, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 882 EH

1 SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF RESERVATION OF FUNDS

2 DURING FISCAL YEAR 1999 FOR GUARANTEED

3 LOANS UNDER THE CONSOLIDATED FARM

4 AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACT FOR QUALI5 FIED BEGINNING FARMERS OR RANCHERS.

6 Amounts shall be made available pursuant to section

7 346(b)(1)(D) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Devel8 opment Act for guaranteed loans, without regard to any

9 reservation under section 346(b)(2)(B) of such Act.

10 SEC. 2. QUALIFIED BEGINNING FARMERS AND RANCHERS

11 TO BE GIVEN PRIORITY IN MAKING GUARAN12 TEED LOANS UNDER THE CONSOLIDATED

13 FARM AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACT FROM

14 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR FIS15 CAL YEAR 1999.

16 In making guaranteed loans under the Consolidated

17 Farm and Rural Development Act from funds made avail18 able pursuant to any Act making supplemental appropria19 tions for fiscal year 1999, the Secretary of Agriculture

20 shall, to the extent practicable, give priority to making
3

•HR 882 EH

1 such loans to qualified beginning farmers and ranchers (as

2 defined in section 343(a)(11) of such Act).

Passed the House of Representatives March 2,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 102-78.10 What basic historic preservation policy governs Federal agencies?

To protect, enhance and preserve historic and cultural property under their control, Federal agencies must consider the effects of their undertakings on historic and cultural properties and give the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Advisory Council), the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and other consulting parties a reasonable opportunity to comment regarding the proposed undertakings.