alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 61-300.1 What is the purpose and scope of this part? ( a ) This part 61-300 implements 38 U.S.C. 4212(d). Each contractor or subcontractor who enters into a contract or subcontract in the amount of $100,000 or more with any department or agency of the United States for the procurement of personal property and non-personal services (including construction), and who is subject to 38 U.S.C. 4212(a), must report annually to the Secretary of Labor information on the number of employees in its workforce who belong to the categories of veterans protected under the Act, and the number of those employees who were hired during the period covered by the report. Each contractor or subcontractor must provide the required information on veterans' employment by filing the Federal Contractor Veterans' Employment Report VETS-4212 (VETS-4212 Report), in accordance with the requirements of § 61-300.11.
( b ) Notwithstanding the regulations in this part, the regulations at 41 CFR part 60-300, administered by OFCCP continue to apply to contractors' and subcontractors' affirmative action obligations regarding protected veterans.
( c ) Reporting requirements of this part regarding protected veterans will be deemed waived in those instances in which the Director of OFCCP has granted a waiver under 41 CFR 60-300.4(b)(1), or has concurred in the granting of a waiver under 41 CFR 60-300.4(b)(3), from compliance with all the terms of the equal opportunity clause for those establishments not involved in Government contract work. Where OFCCP grants only a partial waiver, compliance with these reporting requirements regarding protected veterans will be required.
( d ) 41 CFR part 60-300, subpart C and Appendix B to part 60-300 provide guidance concerning the affirmative action obligations of Federal contractors toward applicants for employment who are protected veterans.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE ARMCO INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
               SHEETS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND
               ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
               REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<CIK>          0000007383
<NAME>         ARMCO INC.
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
<CURRENCY>     U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                            151,200
<SECURITIES>                       25,100
<RECEIVABLES>                     223,000
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       242,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  652,500
<PP&E>                          1,357,700
<DEPRECIATION>                    746,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,829,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             305,500
<BONDS>                           247,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                       185,900
<COMMON>                            1,100
<OTHER-SE>                         48,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,829,700
<SALES>                           867,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  867,100
<CGS>                             757,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     757,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 11,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    69,000
<INCOME-TAX>                       10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                59,000
<DISCONTINUED>                      7,500
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    (2,800)
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       63,700
<EPS-BASIC>                        0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.47


</TABLE>
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. 

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement 

February 8, 2017 

This First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into effective as
of the date set forth above (the “Effective Date”) by and between ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and JOSEPH A. CHLAPATY (the “Executive”). 

Background 
 A.
Effective as of June 20, 2014, the Company and the Executive entered into that certain Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”); and 

B. The Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement to eliminate the Executive’s right to use the Company’s aircraft for
charitable uses and purposes and, in exchange therefor, the Company will increase the Executive’s base salary by an agreed-upon amount. 

Statement of Agreement 

In consideration of the promises and mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree as set forth below. 
 Section 1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used
herein without definition have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. The term “Agreement”, as used in the Agreement, shall, unless otherwise specified or unless the context otherwise requires, mean the Agreement and this
Amendment, together, it being the intent of the Company and the Executive that each of the foregoing be applied and construed as a single instrument. 

Section 2. Amendment. Section 5(d) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “and/or
charitable uses and purposes”. 
 Section 3. Ratification and Reaffirmation of the
Agreement. The Company and the Executive hereby ratify and reaffirm all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement, which, as amended and supplemented by this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed multiple counterparts of this Amendment effective as of the Effective Date.

 ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. 
  

									
	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin C. Talley
	 		 	 /s/ Joseph A. Chlapaty
	 	
	Name: Kevin C. Talley	 		 	Joseph A. Chlapaty	 	
	Title: EVP & CAO	 		 		 	


  
 1
Strafford

No. 79-451

#### Richard L. Proulx, Sr. v. City of Dover Zoning Board of Adjustment

October 2, 1980

*McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton P.A.,*of Manchester, by brief for the plaintiff.

*Scott E. Woodman,*city attorney, by brief for the defendants.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the City of Dover Zoning Board of Adjustment under RSA 31:77 seeking to set aside the decree of the Strafford County Superior Court, dated December 3, 1979, which granted the plaintiffs request for a variance.

After a trial, which included a view, the Master *(Donald F. Whittum,*Esq.) found that the zoning board’s denial of the plaintiff’s request for a variance was unjust and unreasonable. He granted the request, and the Superior Court *(Mullavey,*J.) approved the decree. The city filed a notice of appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7, but it did not move to set aside the decree below or request findings and rulings. The city briefed issues related to sufficiency of evidence in the case below, but did not file a motion for nonsuit or directed verdict.

Supreme Court Rule 3 provides that an “appeal” constitutes “[a]ppellate review of a party’s exceptions, after a final decision on the merits in a lower court.” In *Garland & LaChance Constr. Co. v. City of Keene,*117 N.H. 920, 379 A.2d 1259 (1977), the losing party did not request findings and rulings or file an exception to the master’s report. In that case there was a motion to set aside the verdict which permitted a review of the evidence.

There being no exception before us, the order is

*Dismissed.*
§ 51-8.1 General. ( a ) This part contains the rules that the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled (Committee) follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. 552. The rules in this part should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB Guidelines”). Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed under part 51-9 as well as under this part. As a matter of policy, the Committee makes discretionary disclosures of records or information exempt from disclosure under the FOIA whenever disclosure would not foreseeably harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption, but this policy does not create any right enforceable in court.
( b ) The Committee has a centralized system for processing requests, all requests are handled by the FOIA Officer.
# Comments on: 2021-2354: Power Probe Group, Inc. v. Innova Electronics Corporation
§ 105-56.014 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart establishes procedures for the offset of Federal salary payments, through the Financial Management Service's (FMS) administrative offset program, to collect delinquent debts owed to the Federal Government. This process is known as centralized salary offset. Rules issued by the Office of Personnel Management contain the requirements Federal agencies must follow prior to conducting salary offset and the procedures for requesting offsets directly from a paying agency. See 5 CFR parts 550.1101 through 550.1108.
( b ) This subpart implements the requirement under 5 U.S.C. 5514 (a)(1) that all Federal agencies, using a process known as centralized salary offset computer matching, identify Federal employees who owe delinquent non-tax debt to the United States. Centralized salary offset computer matching is the computerized comparison of delinquent debt records with records of Federal employees. The purpose of centralized salary offset computer matching is to identify those debtors whose Federal salaries should be offset to collect delinquent debts owed to the Federal Government.
( c ) This subpart specifies the delinquent debt records and Federal employee records that must be included in the salary offset matching process. For purposes of this subpart, delinquent debt records consist of the debt information submitted to FMS for purposes of administrative offset as required under 31 U.S.C. 3716(c)(6). Since GSA submits debts to FMS for purposes of administrative offset, the Agency is not required to submit duplicate information for purposes of centralized salary offset computer matching under 5 U.S.C. 5514(a)(1) and this subpart.
( d ) An interagency consortium was established to implement centralized salary offset computer matching on a Governmentwide basis as required under 5 U.S.C. 5514(a)(1). Federal employee records consist of records of Federal salary payments disbursed by members of the consortium.
( e ) The receipt of collections from salary offsets does not preclude GSA from pursuing other debt collection remedies, including the offset of other Federal payments to satisfy delinquent non-tax debt owed to the United States. GSA will pursue, when appropriate, such debt collection remedies separately or in conjunction with salary offset.
No. 11-9246.

#### Fatumabahirtu v. United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
§ 128-1.5006-3 Department employees. Each employee of the Department who has use of, supervises the use of, or has control over Government property is responsible for that property. This responsibility may take either or both of the following forms: ( a ) Supervisory responsibility, in which an officer-in-charge, and administrative officer, or a supervisor is obligated to establish and enforce necessary administrative and security measures to ensure proper preservation and use of all Government property under his jurisdiction.
( b ) Personal responsibility, in which each employee of the Department is obligated to properly care for, handle, use, and protect Government property issued to or assigned for the employee's use at or away from the office or station.
#### § 302-10.401 Are the allowances for transporting a mobile home in addition to the allowances for per diem, mileage, and transportation expenses, for an employee and immediate family member(s)?

Yes, allowances for transporting a mobile home (including mileage when towed by the employee) are in addition to the allowances for per diem, mileage, and transportation expenses. However, you must consider the fact that the mobile home will be used as the employee's and/or immediate family member(s) primary residence at the new official station, and reduce the allowances under parts 302-5, 302-6, and 302-11 of this chapter.
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.2





FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE RAYONIER ADVANCED MATERIALS INC. 2017 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN




This First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc. 2017 Incentive Stock Plan (the “2017 Plan”) is adopted as of October 21, 2019 by the Board of Directors of Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc. (the “Company”).
1.  The definition of Change in Control in Section 2 of the 2017 Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:  
“Change in Control” has the meaning set forth in the Executive Severance Plan.
2.  Section 10(c)(iii) of the 2017 Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety.
3.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the 2017 Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-62329-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

ALEXANDER MARIE CO. LTD., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SEMPRE ITALIA, LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 

RULE 4(M) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court sua sponte.

Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff must serve the 

summons and complaint on the defendant within 90 days after filing the complaint. While 

service in a foreign country under Rule 4(f) is exempt from the Rule 4(m) time limit for service, 

the time allowable for accomplishing foreign service cannot be unlimited. Mumford v. Carnival 

Corp., 5 F. Supp. 3d 1365, 1366 (S.D. Fla. 2014) (citing 12B Fed. Practice & Procedure, Civil 

Rules, Quick Reference Guide, at 79 (Thomson Reuters 2013)). “[D]istrict courts must retain the 

ability to control their dockets.” Id. For this reason, some courts have conditioned the exemption 

of foreign service from Rule 4(m) on a showing of good faith effort to service the Defendant 

within the 90-day time period. See Da v. Altafonte Corp., No. 20-CV-20997, 2020 WL 3078502, 

at *1 (S.D. Fla. June 10, 2020). 

Plaintiffs’ Complaint was filed on December 12, 2022, yet there is no indication that 

Plaintiffs have successfully served any of the remaining Defendants.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before March 28, 2023, 

Case 0:22-cv-62329-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2023 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiffs shall either perfect service upon Defendants, show that service has already been made, 

or show good cause why service has not been perfected. Failure to timely respond will result in 

immediate dismissal of this action without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 14th day of March, 2023.

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record 

Case 0:22-cv-62329-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 50-203.2 Issuance of a formal complaint.

After a report of a breach or violation has been filed, or upon his own motion and without any report of a breach or violation having been previously filed, the Solicitor may issue and cause to be served upon the respondent a formal complaint stating the charges. Notice of hearing before an administrative law judge designated by the Secretary of Labor shall be issued and served within a reasonable time after the issuance of the complaint. A copy of the complaint and notice of hearing shall be served upon the surety or sureties. Unless the administrative law judge otherwise determines, the date of hearing shall not be sooner than 30 days after the date of issuance of the complaint.

[35 FR 14839, Sept. 24, 1970, as amended at 61 FR 19987, May 3, 1996]
# Comments on: 22-1249: APPLE INC. v. VIDAL [OPINION], Precedential
#### § 301-70.901 Who may approve use of our Government aircraft to carry passengers?

Your agency head or their designee must approve the use of your agency's Government aircraft for travel, *i.e.,* for carrying passengers and any crewmembers or qualified non-crewmembers who are also traveling. This approval must be in writing and may be for recurring travel.

[FTR Amdt. 2004-02, 69 FR 34305, June 21, 2004, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12252, Feb. 16, 2024]
S89A0093.

#### MARBURY v. MARBURY.

(386 SE2d 660)

Decided September 28, 1989

Reconsideration denied October 18, 1989.

Alimony. Muscogee Superior Court. Before Judge Whisnant.

*Larry L. Taylor, Samuel W. Worthington III,*for appellant. *Neal B. Littlejohn,*for appellee.

Per curiam.

When we granted Mr. Marbury’s discretionary application we expressed interest in whether the trial court erred in denying Mr. Mar-bury’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We find that it did and we reverse.

This is the second time these parties have appeared before this Court. In *Marbury v. Marbury,*256 Ga. 651 (352 SE2d 564) (1987), we found that “the attempt to exercise personal jurisdiction over Mr. Marbury was unconstitutional.” Id. at 655. We find that the “minimum contacts” as set forth in *Smith v. Smith,*254 Ga. 450, 453 (330 SE2d 706) (1985), are missing in this case, and the trial court should have granted Mr. Marbury’s motion to dismiss.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Stephen C.Donnelly, certify that:

1.       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emtec, Inc.;

2.       Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; 

3.       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.       Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

          a)          designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b)          evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

          c)          disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      The registrant's other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committeeof registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

          a)          allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information;  and

          b)          anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

Date: January23, 2006
# Comments on: 2020-1260: P.K. Management Group, Inc. v. HUD
#### § 302-6.103 May my agency reduce my TQSE allowance below the “maximum allowable amount”?

Yes, if the estimated daily amount of your TQSE is determined in advance to be lower than the maximum daily amount, your agency may reduce the maximum allowable amount to your expected expenses provided the new applicable amount is annotated on the relocation authorization before you occupy temporary quarters. However, see § 302-6.30 regarding househunting trips.
027P16

#### State v. Keyshawn Jones

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-804)

1. Allowed 01/26/2016

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supes-sedeas*

*2.*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODEAS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant toSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of AmericanScience & Engineering, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certifythat to the undersigned’s knowledge:

1.                                        the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedDecember 31, 2006 (“10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.                                        the information contained in the Company’s 10-Q being filedfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 
| Date: February 9, 2007 |   | /s/Anthony R. Fabiano                 |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Anthony R. Fabiano                    |
|                   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AmericanScience & Engineering, Inc. and will be retained by AmericanScience & Engineering, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----