alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5671

To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish election day in Presidential

election years as a legal public holiday by moving the legal public holiday

known as Veterans Day to election day in such years, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 15, 2000

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish election

day in Presidential election years as a legal public holiday by moving the legal public holiday known as Veterans Day to election day in such years, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF ELECTION DAY IN PRESI4 DENTIAL ELECTION YEARS AS A LEGAL PUB5 LIC HOLIDAY.

6 Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, is

7 amended—
2

•HR 5671 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘the Tuesday next after the

2 first Monday in November in 2004 and each fourth

3 year thereafter, and’’ after ‘‘Veterans Day,’’; and

4 (2) by inserting ‘‘in any other year’’ after ‘‘No5 vember 11’’.

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING TREATMENT OF

7 DAY BY PRIVATE EMPLOYERS.

8 It is the sense of Congress that private employers in

9 the United States should give their employees a day off

10 on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November

11 in 2004 and each fourth year thereafter to enable the em12 ployees to cast votes in the Presidential and other elections

13 held on that day.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41147 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MELVA ZARATE Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-8-ALL Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Melva Zarate has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Zarate has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                the Report.



                              By: /s/ Joseph J. Bouffard
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Name:    Joseph J. Bouffard
                                  Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer



                              By: /s/ Michael J. Dee
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Name:    Michael J. Dee
                                  Title:   Senior-Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer


Date:  November 10, 2005
#### § 301-51.7 For what purposes may I use the Government contractor-issued travel charge card while on official travel?

You are required to use the Government contractor-issued travel charge card for expenses directly related to your official travel.

[FTR Amdt. 2010-02, 75 FR 24436, May 5, 2010. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2016-01, 81 FR 63138, Sept. 14, 2016]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7469
MARSHALL L. LAND, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOLICITOR, Dorchester County, SC; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-94-1090-6-22AK) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marshall L. Land, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Land v. South Carolina , No. CA-94-1090-6-22AK (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 4, 2022

No. 04-13-00837-CR

Dorin James WALKER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR8371B

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This court’s opinion in this appeal issued on October 29, 2014. This court’s mandate 

issued on February 2, 2015. Appellant has filed a pro se motion requesting a copy of the record 

in this appeal for purposes of filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. This court has no 

jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 11.07; In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. 

proceeding). Post-conviction writs of habeas corpus are to be filed in the trial court in which the 

conviction was obtained, and made returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE 

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. In order to obtain a free copy of the record, appellant would need to file 

a motion in the trial court in which the conviction was obtained and demonstrate that his claim is 

not frivolous and that the record is needed to decide the issues presented. See United States v. 

MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 326 (1976); Escobar v. State, 880 S.W.2d 782, 783 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no pet.). Appellant’s motion is DENIED without prejudice to seeking

relief in the proper court.

It is so ORDERED on this 4th day of August, 2022.

 PER CURIAM 

 ATTESTED TO: ______________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 10.5
 ALLIS-CHALMERS ENERGY INC.
 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE AWARD AGREEMENT  Pursuant to the terms of the Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan
 1. Grant of Performance Award.  [ xx,xxx ] [ xx/xx/xx ]
 2. Settlement of Performance Award.
 3. Risk of Forfeiture.
 4. Performance Objectives.
  - 1 -




---



##### 



5. Transferability.
 6. No Ownership Rights.
 7. Termination of Employment.
 8. Change in Control.
 Change in Control.
 Right of Cash-Out.
 - 2 -




---



##### 



9. Reorganization of Company and Subsidiaries.
 10. Adjustment of Shares.
 11. Certain Restrictions.
 12. Amendment and Termination.
 - 3 -




---



##### 



13. No Guarantee of Employment.
 14. Tax Matters.
   PARTICIPANT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT IS PARTICIPANTS SOLE RESPONSIBILITY, AND NOT THE
COMPANYS, TO FILE A TIMELY ELECTION UNDER SECTION 83(b) IF PARTICIPANT ELECTS TO DO SO,
EVEN IF PARTICIPANT REQUESTS THE COMPANY OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES TO MAKE THIS FILING ON
PARTICIPANTS BEHALF. PARTICIPANT MUST AND IS RELYING SOLELY ON PARTICIPANTS OWN ADVISORS
WITH RESPECT TO THE DECISION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT TO FILE ANY SECTION 83(b) ELECTION.
  15. Community Interest of Spouse.
 16. Consent to Electronic Delivery; Electronic Signature.
 - 4 -




---



##### 



17. Severability.
 18. Governing Law.
 COMPANY:ALLIS-CHALMERS ENERGY INC.By:Printed Name:Title:PARTICIPANT:By:(signature)
 - 5 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                     2,184
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             13,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                 121
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          21,509
<PP&E>                                     1,645
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            26,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     15,700
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      54
<OTHER-SE>                                10,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              26,269
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          66,184
<CGS>                                     62,005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             65,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              149
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (10)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          159
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .03
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Eric P. Y oungdale 

DuPont Fluoroproducts 

Chestnut Run Plaza 

P.O. Box 29 15 

974 Centre Road 

Wilmington. Delaware 19805 

APR 2 2 2015 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Re: Completeness Determination for S AP ubmission for R-449A (Opteon XP40) in 

Refrigeration and Air Conditioning 

Dear Mr. Youngdale: 

Thank you for DuPont's submission to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for R-449A 

(Opteon ® XP 40) in refrigeration and air conditioning. EPA established the Significant New 

Alternatives Policy (SNJ\P) program to implement section 612 of the Clean Air Act. Your 

submission received on August 6, 2014 has been reviewed for completeness. We have found the 

infonnation to be complete. 

Here is a summary of information concerning your submission: 

Substitute name: R-449A (Opteon ® XP40) 

Percent Composition: 24.3% HFC-32 

24.7% 1-IFC-125 

25.3% 11FO-l234yf 

25.7% IIFC-134a 

Substance(s) the substitute will replace: R-402A, R-4028. R-404A. R-407 A. R-407C. R-407F 

and R-507A 

Sector: Refrigeration and Air Conditioning 

End-uses: Retail food refrigeration, refrigerated transport. commercial ice machines, cold storage 

warehouses. industrial process refrigeration and industrial process air-conditioning. 

New or Retrofit usage: Retrofits and New Equipment 

Date received: August 6. 2014 

Date of most recent information received: November 24. 20 14 

Internet Address (URL) • hnp //www epa gov 

Rccyc ledi Recyctablc • Pnn1eo w1th Vegetable 011 Based Inks on 100"· Postconsumer Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper 
Status of submission: Complete 

Your submission was complete as of November 24, 2014. For purposes of the SNAP program, 

Opteon XP 40 may be sold and imported in the refrigeration and air conditioning end uses 

described above as of February 22, 20 15. We note that DuPont must also comply with 40 CFR 

72 1.10 182. If you have questions about your submission, pl ease contact me at (202) 343-9624 or 

Wozniak.gerald@.epa.gov. 

Cc: 

Ms. Mary E. Kohan 

DuPont Fluoroproducts 

Chestnut Run Plaza P.O. Box 2915 

974 Centre Road Wilmington, DE 19805 

Sincerely. 

Gerald Wozniak 

Altematives and Emissions Reduction Branch 

Stratospheric Protection Division
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-3214

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Deshawn Michael Mapp, * * [PUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 20, 2012 Filed: July 2, 2012

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. On February 27 and Marc h 5, 2010, Deshawn Michael Mapp sold cocaine base (crack cocaine) to a confidential informant. Thereafter, a grand jury returned an indictment charging him with two counts of distribution of at least five grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C . §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Mapp entered into a written plea agr eement, which the district court accepted.
Before his September 29, 2011, sent encing hearing, Mapp submitted a memoranda urging the district court to apply the Fair Senten cing Act (FSA), which had taken effect on August 3, 2010. Retro active application of the FSA and the conforming amendments to the United States Sentencing Guidelines would have hadthe effect of reducing Mapp’s statutor y maximum term of imprisonment, see21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C), and his offens e level under the Guidelines, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1(b). The distri ct court denied Mapp’ s request, consistent with this court’s decision in United States v. Sidney , 648 F.3d 904 (8th Cir. 2011). Sidney held that “the FSA is not retroac tive, even as to defendants who were sentenced after the enactment of the FS A where their criminal conduct occurred before the enactment.” Id. at 910.
Mapp appealed his sentence, and we he ld the appeal in abeyance pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Dorsey v. United States and Hill v. United States . The Supreme Court has now abrogated our holding in Sidney and ruled that the FSA’s “more lenient penalty provisions apply to offenders who committed a crack cocaine crime before August 3, 2010, but were notsentenced until after August 3.” Dorsey v. United States , No. 11-5683, 2012 WL 2344463 (U.S. J une 21, 2012). We therefore vacate Mapp’s sentence and remand for resentencing.

______________________________

-2-
§ 101-4.415 Access to course offerings. ( a ) A recipient shall not provide any course or otherwise carry out any of its education program or activity separately on the basis of sex, or require or refuse participation therein by any of its students on such basis, including health, physical education, industrial, business, vocational, technical, home economics, music, and adult education courses.
( b ) ( 1 ) With respect to classes and activities in physical education at the elementary school level, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than one year from September 29, 2000. With respect to physical education classes and activities at the secondary and post-secondary levels, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than three years from September 29, 2000.
( 2 ) This section does not prohibit grouping of students in physical education classes and activities by ability as assessed by objective standards of individual performance developed and applied without regard to sex.
( 3 ) This section does not prohibit separation of students by sex within physical education classes or activities during participation in wrestling, boxing, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball, and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact.
( 4 ) Where use of a single standard of measuring skill or progress in a physical education class has an adverse effect on members of one sex, the recipient shall use appropriate standards that do not have such effect.
( 5 ) Portions of classes in elementary and secondary schools, or portions of education programs or activities, that deal exclusively with human sexuality may be conducted in separate sessions for boys and girls.
( 6 ) Recipients may make requirements based on vocal range or quality that may result in a chorus or choruses of one or predominantly one sex.
No. 10-11243.

#### Clark *v.*Richmond Department of Social Services.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
JAYINSLEE 

Governor 

STATE OF WASHINGTON 

Office of the Governor 

RECEIVED ON:

<4­

JAN 1 2 2015

EPA Region 10 

Office ofthe Regional Administrator 

January 8, 2015 

Dennis McLerran, Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Dear Mr. McLerran: 

Thank you for your December 11, 2014, letter regarding the Grain Handling Facility at Freeman. 

In your letter you indicated that you were seeking the State of Washington's concurrence with 

adding the Grain Handling Facility at Freeman (GHFF) to the Superfund National Priorities List 

(NPL). 

I support EPA's proposed addition of the GHFF to the NPL. Carbon Tetrachloride 

contamination of ground water originating at the GHFF has impacted the Freeman School 

Campus drinking water supply well. In my view, it is essential to pursue cleanup of this 

contamination and restore this valuable ground water resource. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. The Washington State Department of Ecology's 

Toxics Cleanup Program is available to work closely with your staff to address this site. If you 

have any other needs, please contact Jim Pendowski, Toxics Cleanup Program Manager at (360) 

407-7177. 

P.O. Box 40002 • Olympia, Washington 98504-0002 • (360) 902-4111 • www.governor.wa.gov
# Comments on: 2022-1758: In Re Universal Electronics, Inc.
#### § 301-76.1 May we collect undisputed delinquent amounts that an employee (including members of the uniformed services) owes to a Government travel charge card contractor?

Yes, upon written request from the contractor and in accordance with the procedures specified in § 301-76.100, you may collect undisputed amounts owed to a Government travel charge card contractor from the delinquent employee's disposable pay. You must promptly forward all amounts deducted to the contractor.
§ 109-43.314 Use of excess personal property on grants. ( a ) - ( e ) [Reserved]
( f ) Program Secretarial Officer (PSO) shall ensure that the records required by 41 CFR 101-43.314(f) are maintained.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
over financial reporting and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: January 12, 2009By:
    /s/ Dennis M. SmithDennis M. SmithChief Financial Officer