alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.1

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

OF

KINDER MORGAN, INC.

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of Kinder Morgan, Inc. is effective as of January 18, 2017.  Capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the same meanings given to them in the Plan unless otherwise indicated.

 

WHEREAS, the Plan was originally adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) as the Annual Incentive Plan of Kinder Morgan, Inc., effective as of January 1, 2011. The Plan was amended and restated as the Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Plan of Kinder Morgan, Inc. by the Board on January 21, 2015, and was approved the Company’s stockholders; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan as set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

 

1.                                      Amendments.

 

a.              Clawbacks

 

Section 3.8 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“3.8        Clawbacks

 

To the extent required by Company policy or applicable laws, rules, regulations or securities exchange listing requirements, the Company shall have the right, and shall take all actions necessary, to recover any amounts paid to any individual under this Plan.”

 

2.                                      Effect on the Plan.  Other than as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain unaffected by the terms of this Amendment, and shall continue in full force and effect.

 

1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Analogic Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael L.
Levitz, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: March 11, 2011



/s/ Michael L. LevitzMichael L. LevitzVice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
§ 105-8.170-6 Acceptance of complaint. ( a ) The Official shall accept a complete complaint that is filed in accordance with § 105-8.170-4 and over which the agency has jurisdiction. The Official shall notify the complainant and the respondent of receipt and acceptance of the complaint.
( b ) If the Official receives a complaint that is not complete, he or she shall notify the complainant within 30 days of receipt of the incomplete complaint that additional information is needed. If the complainant fails to complete the complaint within 30 days of receipt of this notice, the Official shall dismiss the complaint without prejudice.
( c ) The Official may reject a complaint, or a position thereof, for any of the following reasons: ( 1 ) It was not filed timely and the extension of the 180-day period as provided in § 105-8.170-4(c) is denied;
( 2 ) It consists of an allegation identical to an allegation contained in a previous complaint filed on behalf of the same complainant(s) which is pending in the agency or which has been resolved or decided by the agency; or
( 3 ) It is not within the purview of this part.
( d ) If the Official receives a complaint over which the agency does not have jurisdiction, the Official shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate Government entity.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39374-39378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program

ACTION: Notice of the annual updates to the income contingent repayment 
(ICR) plan formula; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 25, 2000, a notice was published in the Federal 
Register (65 FR 34006-34007) announcing the annual update to the income 
percentage factors for 2000 which are used to calculate the borrower's 
monthly payment amount under the income contingent repayment plan in 
the William D. Ford Direct Loan Program. This information is revised 
annually to reflect changes in the consumer price index.

Correction

    The charts showing sample monthly repayment amounts, mentioned on 
page 34006, were inadvertently excluded. The charts are (pages 4 and 5) 
attached to this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don Watson, U.S. Department of 
Education, Room 3045, ROB-3, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20202-5400. Telephone: (202) 708-8242. If you use a telecommunications 
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Information Relay 
Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
    Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an 
alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print,

[[Page 39375]]

audiotape or computer diskette) on request to the contact person listed 
in the preceding paragraph.

Electronic Access to This Document

    You may review this document, as well as all other Department of 
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe 
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following sites:

http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm
http://www.ed.gov/news.html

To use the PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available 
free at either of the previous sites. If you have questions about using 
the PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free at 
1-888-293-6498 or in the Washington D.C., area at (202) 512-1530.

    Note: The official version of this document is the document 
published in the Federal Register. Free internet access to the 
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal 
Regulations is available on GPO access at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.268 William D. 
Ford Federal Direct Loan Program)


(Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087 et seq.)

    Dated: June 20, 2000.
Greg Woods,
Chief Operating Officer.

BILLING CODE 400-01-P

[[Page 39376]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26JN00.001


[[Page 39377]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26JN00.002

[FR Doc. 00-16040 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-C
§ 201-1.301 Recommendation. ( a ) *Content of recommendation.* The FASC shall include the following in any recommendation for the issuance of an exclusion or removal order made to the Secretary of Homeland Security, Secretary of Defense, and/or Director of National Intelligence: ( 1 ) Information necessary to positively identify any source or covered article recommended for exclusion or removal;
( 2 ) Information regarding the scope and applicability of the recommended exclusion or removal order, including whether the order should apply to all executive agencies or a subset of executive agencies;
( 3 ) A summary of the supply chain risk assessment reviewed or conducted in support of the recommended exclusion or removal order, including significant conflicting or contrary information, if any;
( 4 ) A summary of the basis for the recommendation, including a discussion of less intrusive measures that were considered and why such measures were not reasonably available to reduce supply chain risk;
( 5 ) A description of the actions necessary to implement the recommended exclusion or removal order; and,
( 6 ) Where practicable, in the FASC's sole and unreviewable discretion, a description of the mitigation steps that could be taken by the source that may result in the FASC's rescission of the recommendation.
( b ) *Information sharing in the absence of a recommendation:* If the FASC decides not to issue a recommendation, information received and analyzed pursuant to the procedures in this section may be shared, as appropriate, in accordance with subpart B of this part.
#### § 102-80.45 What are Federal agencies' responsibilities concerning seismic safety in Federal facilities?

Federal agencies must follow the standards issued by the Interagency Committee on Seismic Safety in Construction (ICSSC) as the minimum level acceptable for use by Federal agencies in assessing the seismic safety of their owned and leased buildings and in mitigating unacceptable seismic risks in those buildings.
5 November 2015

353P15

#### Carolyn Joyner Driggers, Individually and as Co-Trust and Co-Beneficiary of the Barney G. Joyner Family Trust, and Phyllis M. Joyner, by and through Carolyn Driggers as Attorney-in-Fact v. David Lee Joyner and Ronald Dorrestein

1. Pit’s (Carolyn Joyner Driggers) Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA

1.

2. Pit’s (Carolyn Joyner Driggers) Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court of Wake County

2.

3. Defs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*

3. Allowed 10/27/2015
**Exhibit (32)**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002In connection with this quarterly report of American Greetings Corporation on Form 10-Q as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of American Greetings Corporation.  October 7, 2005   /s/ Zev Weiss   Zev WeissChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)  /s/ Michael J. Merriman, Jr.   Michael J. Merriman, Jr. Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,934
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (226)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,773
<PP&E>                                           1,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (602)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,346
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          8
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,687
<SALES>                                          6,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,599
<CGS>                                            3,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,554
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (360)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,895)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,895)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)


</TABLE>
§ 105-72.402 Real property. Each Federal awarding agency shall prescribe requirements for recipients concerning the use and disposition of real property acquired in whole or in part under awards. Unless otherwise provided by statute, such requirements, at a minimum, shall contain the following. ( a ) Title to real property shall vest in the recipient subject to the condition that the recipient shall use the real property for the authorized purpose of the project as long as it is needed and shall not encumber the property without approval of the Federal awarding agency.
( b ) The recipient shall obtain written approval by the Federal awarding agency for the use of real property in other federally-sponsored projects when the recipient determines that the property is no longer needed for the purpose of the original project. Use in other projects shall be limited to those under federally-sponsored projects (i.e., awards) or programs that have purposes consistent with those authorized for support by the Federal awarding agency.
( c ) When the real property is no longer needed as provided in paragraphs (a) and (b), the recipient shall request disposition instructions from the Federal awarding agency or its successor Federal awarding agency. The Federal awarding agency shall observe one or more of the following disposition instructions. ( 1 ) The recipient may be permitted to retain title without further obligation to the Federal Government after it compensates the Federal Government for that percentage of the current fair market value of the property attributable to the Federal participation in the project.
( 2 ) The recipient may be directed to sell the property under guidelines provided by the Federal awarding agency and pay the Federal Government for that percentage of the current fair market value of the property attributable to the Federal participation in the project (after deducting actual and reasonable selling and fix-up expenses, if any, from the sales proceeds). When the recipient is authorized or required to sell the property, proper sales procedures shall be established that provide for competition to the extent practicable and result in the highest possible return.
( 3 ) The recipient may be directed to transfer title to the property to the Federal Government or to an eligible third party provided that, in such cases, the recipient shall be entitled to compensation for its attributable percentage of the current fair market value of the property.
#### § 102-75.475 What happens after the disposal agency receives the Secretary of the Interior's determination for disposal of the surplus property for a historic monument and compatible revenue-producing activities?

The head of the disposal agency or his or her designee may convey to an eligible public agency surplus property determined by the Secretary of the Interior to be suitable and desirable for use as a historic monument for the benefit of the public and for compatible revenue-producing activities subject to the provisions of 40 U.S.C. 550(h).
afom_ex106.htm

EXHIBIT 10.6

 

 

 


	 
	1

	


	 



 

 


	 
	2

	


	 



 

 

 


	
3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7650 

ALVIN LEE GREGORY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, Mount Olive

Correctional Complex,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-101-5)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 25, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Lee Gregory, Appellant Pro Se. Heather A. Connolly, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Lee Gregory, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Gregory has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### § 302-5.102 Under what circumstances may we authorize a househunting trip?

You may authorize a househunting trip on an individual-case basis when the employee has accepted the transfer and the employee's circumstances indicate that a househunting trip actually is needed. You may not authorize a househunting trip when the purpose of the trip is to assist the employee in deciding whether the employee will accept the transfer.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12255, Feb. 16, 2024]
#### § 301-11.305 What if my actual expenses exceed the 300 percent ceiling?

Your reimbursement is limited to the 300 percent ceiling. There is no authority to exceed this ceiling.
#### § 109-43.302-50 Utilization by designated contractors.

Program Secretarial Officer (PSO) may authorize designated contractors to perform the functions pertaining to the utilization of excess personal property normally performed by a Federal agency, provided the designated contractors have written policies and procedures.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING,
INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUN. 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,251
<PP&E>                                           6,955
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,763
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,312
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,693
<SALES>                                         15,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,063
<CGS>                                           11,335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (151)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     47
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 29
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        29
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
#### Langston Construction Company, a corporation, and Standard Accident Insurance Company, a corporation, *Plaintiffs in*Error, vs. Hillsborough County, Florida, *835a public corporation, for the use and benefit of Standard Oil Company, a Kentucky corporation, *Defendants in Error.*

143 So. 771.

Division B.

Opinion filed September 29, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied October 25, 1932.

*Massey, Warlow, Carpenter <& Fisliback,*for Plaintiff in *Error;*

*Martin S. Long*and *Thos. E. Kelly,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

The Standard Oil Company furnished gasoline, oils and greases to one E. A. Wright, a subcontractor under Langston Construction Company, which had a contract with Hillsborough County for paving certain streets in a Tampa Subdivision known as “Belmar. ” The judgment to which this writ of error was taken was recovered on the contractor’s surety bond given to secure payment of amounts due “to all persons supplying . . . labor, materials and supplies, used directly or indirectly” by the principal contractor or any subcontractor “in the prosecution of the work provided for” in the contract with the County.

The uncontradieted evidence in the ease showed that the Standard Oil Company had supplied to Wright, oils, gasoline and greases to the amount of $4964.52. The controversy at the trial revolved around the insistence of the defendant that not all of these materials were used by the sub-contractor in prosecuting work on the “Bel*836mar” job. That question, however, was submitted to the jury for determination, and we believe properly so, since there was substantial evidence from which it might have been found that all of the particular gasoline, oils and greases sued for, were used in the prosecution of the “Belmar” work by Wright. The jury so found, and the trial court committed no reversible error in refusing to set aside the verdict on account of the alleged insufficiency of the evidence. For the same reason no error was committed in overruling the motions of defendant for a directed verdict.

Other errors have been assigned and argued, but it has not been made to appear that the court committed reversible error in the particular rulings complained of, therefore the judgment should not be otherwise reversed under the circumstances.

The doininant controversy between the parties was one of fact, and that matter of dispute was properly submitted for the consideration and determination of a jury, under charges which fully and fairly committed the ease to the jury’s consideration. The verdict for $4964.52 principal and $366.69 interest appears to be supported by substantial evidence, and will not be disturbed in view of its approval by the trial judge.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Buford, O.J., concurs in the opinion and judgment.

Ellis, J.

(concurring specially).—I agree to the conclusion and the statements in the last paragraph of the opinion.

Brown, J., not participating.