alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 128-50.103 Investigation of any discrepancy. ( a ) Upon discovery of any discrepancy between the inventory records and the bureau's actual amount of seized personal property, a board of survey shall conduct an investigation in accordance with 41 CFR 128-51.1.
( b ) If the discrepancy cannot be eliminated and involves a shortage, the bureau shall notify the U.S. attorney in charge of the litigation involving the missing property of the shortage as soon as possible.
( c ) If the discrepancy cannot be eliminated and involves an overage, the bureau shall determine if the property has any evidentiary value. If the property does have evidentiary value, the property shall be properly stored and inventoried. If the property does not have any evidentiary value, the bureau shall determine whether the property is forfeitable to the United States, voluntarily abandoned, or abandoned. Proper proceedings shall be commenced as soon as possible to vest title of the forfeitable property in the United States. The voluntarily abandoned and abandoned property shall be kept in custody in accordance with 41 CFR 101-48 and any applicable Justice property management regulations.
#### § 301-70.906 Must we report use of our Government aircraft to carry senior Federal officials and non-Federal travelers?

Yes, except when the trips are classified, you must report to the General Services Administration, Office of Government-wide Policy, all uses of your aircraft for travel by any senior Federal official or non-Federal traveler, by using an electronic reporting tool found at “*https://www.gsa.gov/sftr”,* unless travel is authorized under 10 U.S.C. 2648 and regulations implementing that statute.

[85 FR 39849, July 2, 2020]
Pl. Ex. 121

ECF 24-31 p.8

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 171-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 3
Pl. Ex. 74

ECF 24-90

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 171-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 2 of 3
Pl. Exs. 

74 & 121

8 8

7

6

17

13

14

15

12

10

11

6

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 171-20 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 3 of 3
18 December 2015

124PA15

#### State v. Michael Scott Hamilton

1. Defs Petition for *Writ of Habeas Corpus*

1. Dismissed without prejudice

*2.*Defs Motion in the Alternative for Appropriate Relief

2. Dismissed without prejudice
#### § 302-17.41 Is there any difference in the procedures for calculating the CMTR, depending on whether my agency chooses the one-year or two-year RITA process?

No. The procedures for calculating the CMTR are the same for the one-year and two-year RITA processes.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A1 86 0 . COLEMAN v . THE STATE.

Th e ab o v e ap p eal was d o ck et ed o n M ay 2 8
, 2 0 1 5

. Ap pel l an t ’ s b ri ef an d

en u m erat i o n o f erro rs were d u e wi t hi n 2 0 d a ys o f d o ck et i n g

. See Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 2 3 (a).
As o f t h e d at e o f t hi s o rd er, ap p el lan t has n ei t h er fi l ed a b ri ef an d en u m erat i o n

o f erro rs n o r req u es t ed an ex t en s i o n o f t i m e i n wh i ch t o d o s o

. Acco rd i n g ly
, p u rs u an t

t o Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l es 7 an d 2 3 ( a )
, i t i s h ereb y ord ered t h at t h i s ap p eal i s DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 09/02/2015 September 02, 2015
#### § 304-1.2 Under what authority may I accept payment of travel expenses from a non-Federal source?

Under the authority of this part and 31 U.S.C. 1353, you may accept payment of travel expenses from a non-Federal source on behalf of your agency, but not on behalf of yourself, when specifically authorized to do so by your agency and only for official travel to a meeting. Except as provided in § 304-3.13 of this subchapter, your agency must approve acceptance of such payments in advance of your travel.
§ 105-55.032 Claims Collection Litigation Report. ( a ) Unless excepted by the Department of Justice (DOJ), the General Services Administration (GSA) will complete the Claims Collection Litigation Report (CCLR) (see § 105-55.019(b)), accompanied by a signed Certificate of Indebtedness, to refer all administratively uncollectible claims to DOJ for litigation. GSA will complete all sections of the CCLR appropriate to each claim as required by the CCLR instructions and furnish such other information as may be required in specific cases.
( b ) GSA will indicate clearly on the CCLR the actions DOJ should take with respect to the referred claim. The CCLR permits the Agency to indicate specifically any of a number of litigative activities which DOJ may pursue, including enforced collection, judgment lien only, renew judgment lien only, renew judgment lien and enforce collection, program enforcement, foreclosure only, and foreclosure and deficiency judgment.
( c ) GSA also will use the CCLR to refer claims to DOJ to obtain approval of any proposals to compromise the claims or to suspend or terminate Agency collection activity.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 651 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 651

    To prevent Members of Congress from receiving any automatic pay 
         adjustment which might otherwise take effect in 1999.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1999

  Ms. Rivers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prevent Members of Congress from receiving any automatic pay 
         adjustment which might otherwise take effect in 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENT FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS IN 1999.

    The rate of pay for each office or position referred to in section 
601(a)(1) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 
31(1)) shall not be increased by reason of any adjustment which, but 
for this section, would otherwise take effect under section 601(a)(2) 
of such Act in 1999.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 4 0 8 1 2 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. M A R C O A N T O N I O N U N E Z

- R O D E A , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 1 : 0 9

- C R

- 3 3 0

- 1

B e f o r e J O L L Y , S T E W A R T , a n d O W E N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t M a r c o A n t o n i o N u n e z - R o d e a h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n

a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. N u n e z - R o d e a h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f

r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. M o r e o v e r , N u n e z - R o d e a ’ s r e m o v a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s r e n d e r e d m o o t a n y i s s u e s a s t o h i s s e n t e n c e
. S e e U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. R o s e n b a u m - A l a n i s , 4 8 3 F

. 3 d 3 8 1 , 3 8 3 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 7 )

. A c c o r d i n g l y , U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 22 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-40812 Document: 00511149740 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010N o
. 0 9

- 4 0 8 1 2

c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 09-40812 Document: 00511149740 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
II

Calendar No. 368

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 592

[Report No. 106–212]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1, 1999

Received

JULY 13 (legislative day, JULY 12), 1999

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

NOVEMBER 2, 1999

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate a portion of Gateway National Recreation Area

as ‘‘World War Veterans Park at Miller Field’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PORTION OF GATEWAY NA4 TIONAL RECREATION AREA AS WORLD WAR

5 VETERANS PARK AT MILLER FIELD.

6 Section 3(b) of Public Law 92–592 (16 U.S.C.

7 460cc–2(b)) is amended—
2

HR 592 RS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(b)’’; and

2 (2) by adding at the end the following new

3 paragraph:

4 ‘‘(2) The portion of the Staten Island Unit of the

5 recreation area known as Miller Field is hereby designated

6 as ‘World War Veterans Park at Miller Field’. Any ref7 erence to such Miller Field in any law, regulation, map,

8 document, record, or other paper of the United States

9 shall be considered to be a reference to ‘World War Vet10 erans Park at Miller Field’.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 30, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 368

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 592

[Report No. 106–212]

AN ACT

To designate a portion of Gateway National Recreation Area as ‘‘World War Veterans Park at Miller Field’’.

NOVEMBER 2, 1999

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 8, 2003 (the Report), I, Robert Essner, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 8, 2003

                            By /s/            Robert Essner
                               -----------------------------------------------
                                              Robert Essner
                               Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15667]



[[Page 38499]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Changes to Section IV of the Field Office 
Technical Guide (FOTG) of the Natural Resources Conservation Service in 
Indiana

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in section IV of the 
FOTG of the NRCS in Indiana for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRCS in Indiana to issue two revised 
conservation practice standards in section IV of the FOTG. The revised 
standards are Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (Code 645) and 
Irrigation Water Management (Code 449). These practices may be used in 
conservation systems that treat highly erodible land.

DATES: Comments will be received on or before July 21, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Address all requests and comments to Jane E. Hardisty, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 6013 
Lakeside Blvd., Indianapolis, Indiana 46278. Copies of these standards 
will be made available upon written or electronic request. You may 
submit electronic requests and comments to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4cecbc18ac3c5d7d4c1d6cde4cdca8ad1d7c0c58ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e74717b30797f6d6e7b6c775e7770306b6d7a7f30797168">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane E. Hardisty, 317-290-3200.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law, to NRCS state technical guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law, shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS 
in Indiana will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. 
Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in 
Indiana regarding disposition of those comments and a final 
determination of changes will be made.

    Dated: June 12, 2000.
Jane E. Hardisty,
State Conservationist, Indianapolis, Indiana.
[FR Doc. 00-15667 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM

GRACE, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF MIAMI,

Defendant.

 /

SCHEDULING ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Expedited Motion for Preliminary 

Injunction (ECF No. 60) and the Parties’ June 2, 2023 Status Conference (ECF No. 62), it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The Parties shall complete mediation by June 22, 2023. 

2. The Parties shall inform the Court of the status of mediation discussions by June 23, 

2023.

a. If the Parties reach a settlement regarding the interim remedial plan, the Parties 

shall notify the Court of the settlement within three (3) days of the mediation 

conference.

3. Should the Parties fail to reach an agreement on an interim remedial map, Defendant 

shall have until June 30, 2023 to enact and file its own proposed interim remedial map

with the Court. 

a. If Plaintiffs have no objection to Defendant’s proposed interim remedial map, 

Plaintiffs shall notify the Court within two (2) days of their receipt of 

Defendant’s proposed interim remedial map. 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 69 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2023 Page 1 of 2
b. If Plaintiffs object to Defendant’s proposed interim remedial map, Plaintiffs

shall have seven (7) days to file a memorandum in opposition, which shall not

exceed 30 pages. In turn, the Defendant may file a reply within five (5) days

of the filing of Plaintiff’s memorandum, which shall not exceed 10 pages.

4. Should the Parties fail to reach an agreement and Defendant is unable to enact and file

with the Court a proposed interim remedial plan by June 30, 2023, Defendant shall

notify the Court by close of business on June 30, 2023. Each Party shall then have

until July 5, 2023 to propose their own interim remedial plans for the Court’s

consideration. The proposals shall not exceed 30 pages.

a. Each Party will have until July 14, 2023 to file a response brief which shall not

exceed 20 pages.

5. By August 1, 2023, Defendant shall provide the Court’s Order approving any interim

remedial plan to the Miami-Dade County Elections Department along with all files and

data necessary to implement the plan in the November elections.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ______ day of June, 2023.

K. MICHAEL MOORE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

c: All counsel of record

2nd

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 69 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2023 Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 13, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 13, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0359. IN THE INTEREST OF: A. R., A CHILD (FATHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 135038 142849
#### § 109-50.100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart provides guidance on the granting of Laboratory Equipment Donation Program in the LEDP is limited to accredited, post graduate, degree granting institutions including universities, colleges, junior colleges, technical institutes, museums, or hospitals, located in the U.S. and interested in establishing or upgrading energy-oriented educational programs in the life, physical, and environmental sciences and in engineering is eligible to apply. An energy-oriented program is defined as an academic research activity dealing primarily or entirely in energy-related topics.
The Visual Arts Group, LLC

UAS Operations

Aircraft Description

Make and Model UAV Type Maximum Gross take

- off

weight

1. DJI Inspire 1 rotocraft 3 KG

2 . DJI S1000 rotocraft 14KG

Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. fixed wing, rotorcraft, lighter

- than

- air) for the

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload).

This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

05/04/2015
Exhibit 31.2

 **CERTIFICATION**

I, Donald Miller-Jones, Chief Financial Officer of Moscow CableCom Corp., certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Moscow CableCom Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)       Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and;

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  May 16, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81972-CIV-CANNON

OCEANUS ENGINEERING INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

TRIDENT DIVING EQUIPMENT,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING ON 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 

filed December 22, 2022 [ECF No. 5]. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. A hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 5] is scheduled 

for January 31, 2023, 1:00 P.M. at the Alto Lee Adams, Sr. United States Courthouse, 

101 South U.S. Highway 1, Courtroom 4008, Fort Pierce, Florida 34950.

2. Prior to the hearing, Plaintiff shall take all reasonable steps to serve Defendant and 

notify Defendant of the hearing. 

3. On or before January 9, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a status report that outlines the efforts 

taken to effectuate service on Defendant and provide notice of the hearing. 

4. On or before January 20, 2022, the parties shall file a joint hearing plan listing the 

names of proposed witnesses and the estimated time allotted for each which follows 

the format of the Court’s trial plan template, available at 

https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/content/judge-aileen-m-cannon (under “Civil 

Case 9:22-cv-81972-AMC Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2022 Page 1 of 2
 CASE NO. 22-81972-CIV-CANNON

2

Procedures” tab).

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 28th day of 

December 2022.

_________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81972-AMC Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2022 Page 2 of 2