alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM 10-KSB/A
       (Amendment  No. 1)

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

[X]      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]

For the fiscal year ended April 30, 1996.

[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]

For the transition period from ___________ to _______________

Commission File No. 33-99998

GROUP LONG DISTANCE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

FLORIDA                                                  65-0213198
State or other jurisdiction                                  (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization                               Identification No.)

1451 West Cypress Creek Road, Suite 200
Fort Lauderdale, Fl. 33309
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (954) 771-9696

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days.

Yes [X]    No [ ]

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained to the best of registrant's

-1-



<PAGE>
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this
Form 10-KSB [X]

State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $12,364,643

The aggregate market value of the common voting stock held by non-affiliates as
of August 5, 1996 was approximately $12,655.259 based on the last sale price of
the Common Stock on August 5, 1996 of $7.25 per share and reported by NASDAQ
Trading and Market Services Research Department.

Shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock as of August 5, 1996:
2,257,348 shares.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:

Yes [ ]    No [X]

-2-



<PAGE>
GROUP LONG DISTANCE, INC.

Table of Contents
Page No.


PART III.

        Item 13.        Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibit 27-Financial Data Schedule                    5
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None


SIGNATURES      4

-3-

<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this Amendment No. 1 to this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

GROUP LONG DISTANCE, INC.

Date: November 5, 1996  By: /s/ Gerald M. Dunne, Jr.
        Gerald M. Dunne, Jr.,
        President and Chief Executive Officer


-4-
15 December 2015

332PA14-2

#### State v. Gregory Aldon Perkins

1. Def’s Notice of Appeal Based on A Constitutional Question (COA15-15)

1.-

2. Def’s PDR under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Denied

3. Def’s Motion to Withdraw as Private Assigned Counsel

3. Allowed

4. Def’s Motion to Appoint the Appellate Defender

4. Allowed

5. State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

5. Allowed
# Comments on: 21-1749: LEBOLO-WATTS CONSTRUCTORS v. SECRETARY OF THE ARMY [OPINION], Nonprecedential
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. TM00-1-25-003]

      ( print page 39610)    
Take notice that on June 14, 2000, Mississippi River Transmission Corporation (MRT) filed with the Commission a compliance filing revising MRT's annual fuel filing pursuant to the FERC Order Accepting Tariff Sheets Subject to Conditions, issued on May 31, 2000 in Docket No. TM00-1-25-002.

MRT requests permission to place the fuel rates into effect July 1, 2000, and states that Customers have already scheduled and nominated June Business based on fuel rates in effect prior to the Commission's Order.

MRT states that a copy of this filing is being mailed to each of MRT's customers and to the state commissions of Arkansas, Illinois and Missouri.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before June 28, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16142  Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
First Amendment
                                to the
         AMP Incorporated Supplemental Executive Pension Plan


     Pursuant to an action taken by the Board of Directors of AMP Incorporated
on July 22, 1997, the AMP Incorporated Supplemental Executive Pension Plan, as
first adopted effective January 1, 1997, (the "Plan"), is amended effective as
of July 22, 1997 in the following respect:

     1.   Section 9.3(c) of the Plan is amended to delete the term "50%" in
          subpart (A) thereof and to substitute the term "66 2/3%" in lieu
          thereof.

     Except as provided above, all terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan
shall remain in full force and effect and without any further change or
modification whatsoever.

Executed this 25th day of September, 1997.

                                        AMP Incorporated
                                        
   Attest:___________________      By:  _________________________
          Corporate Secretary              J. E. Marley
                                           Chairman
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51139 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS LORA-ROSALES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-214-1-WWJ

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Lora-Rosales appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States afterdeportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. LoraRosales contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Lora-Rosales maintains that heNo. 02-51139 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Lora-Rosales acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16477]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Starch & Chemical Company

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 27, 2000, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Starch & Chemical 
Company has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) The 
identifies of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act, the identities of the parties are National Starch & 
Chemical Company, Bridgewater, NJ; and International Business Machines, 
Yorktown Heights, NY. The nature and objectives of the venture are to 
develop novel, wafer level, high performance underfill technology.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-16477 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Christine Flores Desio d/b/a Professional

Center of Grand Prairie and Francis

Anthony Desio, Jr. a/k/a Frank Desio,

Individually

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Mike Del Bosque d/b/a Injury and Rehab

Center in Grand Prairie

,

Appellee. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 20

- 00 212

- C V

Appeal from the

14 th District Court

of Dallas C ounty, Texas

(TC# DC

- 17

- 04408 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee ’s motion to transfer the above numbered cause to the

Fifth Court of Appeals.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8 th d ay of January , 20 2 1

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , J J

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

TAMMY JORDAN,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 43 WAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
August 8, 2013

Mr. Dennis F. Scheffler

10841 East Rosemary Lane

Scottsdale, AZ 85255

Dear Mr. Scheffler :

This is in response to your letter, dated July 25 , 2013 (public docket No. FAA

- 20 05

- 23237 )

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from § 91.109(a)

and (b)(3) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

. That exemption, if granted,

would allow you to provide recurrent flig ht training in Beechcraft Bonanza/Debonair type

aircraft when those aircraft are equipped with a functioning throw over control wheel.

On August 19, 2011, the FAA issued a revision to14 CFR § 91.109 as part of it “Pilots in

Command Proficiency Check and O ther Changes to the Pilot and Pilot School Certification

Rules” final rule (76 FR 54095; August 31, 2011), which became effective October 31, 2011.

A copy of the rule is enclosed.

Since the relief you requested is permitted in the revised § 91.109, an exemption is no longer

required. Therefore we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
#### § 302-9.304 If I am authorized to transport my POV within CONUS, what must the destination be?

If you are authorized to transport your POV within CONUS your destination must be your new official station.
#### § 302-6.12 How soon may I/we begin occupying temporary quarters at Government expense?

You may begin occupying temporary quarters at Government expense after your agency has authorized you to receive a TQSE allowance and you have signed a service agreement.
#### § 304-9.7 Must we obtain data from employees or donors for all expenses received?

Yes, you must set agency policy to ensure collection of expense data in such detail as you deem necessary to carry out this part.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
  <ARTICLE>         5
  <LEGEND>
  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
  consolidated statement of financial condition at September 30, 1998
  (unaudited) and the consolidated statement of income for the nine
  months ended September 30, 1998 (unaudited) and is qualified in its
  entirety by reference to such financial statements.
  </LEGEND>
  <MULTIPLIER>      1
                    
  <S>                         <C>        <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1998
  <PERIOD-START>                          Jan-01-1998
  <PERIOD-END>                            Sep-30-1998
  <CASH>                                      112,119
  <SECURITIES>                                    -0-
  <RECEIVABLES>                                   -0-
  <ALLOWANCES>                                    -0-
  <INVENTORY>                                     -0-
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                            112,119
  <PP&E>                                          -0-
  <DEPRECIATION>                                  -0-
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                              187,485
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           -0-
  <BONDS>                                         -0-
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           -0-
  <PREFERRED>                                     -0-
  <COMMON>                                    314,080
  <OTHER-SE>                                 <126,595>
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                187,485
  <SALES>                                         -0-
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                            115,916
  <CGS>                                           -0-
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                   -0-
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                            174,892
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                -0-
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              -0-
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                 -0-
  <INCOME-TAX>                                    -0-
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                             -0-
  <DISCONTINUED>                              <58,976>
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                 -0-
  <CHANGES>                                       -0-
  <NET-INCOME>                                <58,976>
  <EPS-PRIMARY>                                 <0.01>
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
                                                 
  
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [DA 00-1383] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This document announces a limited low power television/television translator/Class A television auction filing window. 

# DATES:

The window filing opportunity begins July 31, 2000, and closes August 4, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shaun Maher, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau at (202) 418-1600. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a summary of a Public Notice released June 23, 2000. It does not include attachments. The complete text of the Public Notice, including attachments, is available for public inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. It may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS, Inc.), 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20035, (202) 857-3800. It is also available on the Commission's web site at http://www.fcc.gov. 

                    The Mass Media Bureau and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau announce the scheduling of an auction filing window for certain low power television, television translator, and Class A television broadcast stations. Commencing July 31, 2000, and continuing to and including August 4, 2000, the Commission will permit the filing of applications for new construction permits and for major changes in existing facilities for low power television and television translator stations (LPTV). The Commission also will permit in this auction window the filing of applications for major changes in the facilities of authorized Class A television stations; that is, stations for which a Class A TV construction permit or license has been issued. Mutually exclusive proposals will be considered under the Commission's competitive bidding procedures.                     *See*47 CFR 73.5000*et seq.*

Federal Communications Commission. 

Roy J. Stewart, 

Chief, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-16186 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### § 301-51.5 If my agency grants an exemption, does that prevent me from using the card on a voluntary basis?

No, an exemption from use would not prevent you from using the Government contractor-issued travel charge card on a voluntary basis in accordance with your agency's policy.

[FTR Amdt. 90, 65 FR 3055, Jan. 19, 1998. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2016-01, 81 FR 63138, Sept. 14, 2016]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41147

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MELVA ZARATE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:03-CR-8-ALL

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Melva Zarate has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Zarate has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Order entered September 13, 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00587

- CV

JOHN JEFFREY MCCAFFE RTY, Appellant

V.

MARY M. MCCAFFERTY, ALANA MCCAFFERTY AND AMANDA MCCAFFERTY,

Appellee s

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 08

- 05932



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s September 12, 2016 unopposed second motion for extension of

time to file his brief. We ORDER appell ant’s brief filed no later than September 30, 2016.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE