alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 6.1



Calculation of earnings per share data and weighted average number of shares outstanding.



|                                   |  |                                 |  |             |  |             |  |             |  |            
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | ----------- |  | ----------- |  | -----------
|                                   |  | For the year ended December 31,
|                                   |  | 1999                            |  | 2000        |  | 2001        |  | 2002        |  | 2003       
|Number of shares                   |  | 113,152,446                     |  | 113,152,446 |  | 113,152,446 |  | 113,152,446 |  | 113,152,446
|Net Income (in thousands of U.S.$) |  | 276,061                         |  | 341,152     |  | 180,931     |  | 286,351     |  | 419,467    
|Net income per share               |  | 2.44                            |  | 3.01        |  | 1.60        |  | 2.53        |  | 3.71
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,601,598
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,170,254
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,580,098
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,879,359
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     77,145,924
<ALLOWANCE>                                    631,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              95,328,361
<DEPOSITS>                                  69,671,312
<SHORT-TERM>                                   156,276
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,380,806
<LONG-TERM>                                 13,900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,445
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,214,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              95,328,361
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,689,710
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              265,095
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               284,860
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,239,665
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,691,024
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,305,535
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,934,130
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  245,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,876,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,059,230
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,059,230
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   660,230
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.46
<LOANS-NON>                                    182,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  9,300
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               553,513
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  173,888
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,614
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              631,239
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           631,239
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        184,000


</TABLE>
No. 10-11023.

#### Salinas-Soto *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
15 December 2015

606A05-3

#### State v. Eric Glenn Lane (DEATH)

1. Def’s Motion for Extension of Time to Prepare Transcript

1. Allowed by Special Order 11/18/2015

2. Def’s Motion in the Alternative to Declare the One Hundred Twenty-Five Day Deadline for Capitally Tried Cases Applies

2. Denied

Jackson, J.,

recused
NO. 21803

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

TROY R. EGAMI, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC 95-003-4462, 95-025-4484, 95-067-4526, 95-174-4633, 

95-178-4637, 95-263-4722, 95-306-4765, 95-307-4766, 96-051-4851,

96-144-4944, 96-145-4945, 96-307-5107, 96-332,5132, 96-383-5183,

96-384-5184, 97-060-5254, 98-065-5556, 98-067-5558, 98-080-5571)

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.,

and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Leonard,

assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the August 6, 2020 report, filed

by Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the Office of Disciplinary

Counsel Bradley Tamm, to close this trusteeship over the legal

practice of former attorney Troy R. Egami, conducted pursuant to

Rule 2.20 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of

Hawai&i (RSCH), and upon review of the record in this matter, we

conclude that nothing further remains to be done in this

trusteeship. Therefore, 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

21803

18-AUG-2020

07:55 AM
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall

close Supreme Court Case No. 21803.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 18, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

2
Order entered September 13, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00954-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE RUTH BAKER 

AND GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-13669

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s September 12, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file 

her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to October 11, 2019. 

Appellee shall file her brief in response to the amended brief filed by appellant on August 14, 

2019.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
#### § 102-75.865 What responsibilities does DOT have after receiving the disposal agency's assignment letter?

After receiving the assignment letter from the disposal agency, DOT must provide the disposal agency with a Notice of Proposed Transfer within 30 calendar days after the date of the assignment letter. If the disposal agency approves the proposed transfer within 30 calendar days of the receipt of the Notice of Proposed Transfer, DOT may prepare the conveyance documents and proceed with the conveyance. DOT must take all necessary actions to accomplish the conveyance within 15 calendar days after the expiration of the 30-calendar day period provided for the disposal agency to consider the notice. DOT must furnish the disposal agency two conformed copies of the instruments conveying property and all related documents containing restrictions or conditions regulating the future use, maintenance, or transfer of the property.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-0140V

Filed: June 16, 2015

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

VIRGINIA IVES, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

v. * Influenza or Flu Vaccine; Shoulder

* Injury Related to Vaccine Administration

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”)

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Jeffrey S. Pop, Esq., Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.

Christine M. Becer, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

On February 11, 2015, Virginia Ives filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

[the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury 

caused by the influenza vaccine she received on September 23, 2013. Petition at 1. 

Petitioner also alleges that her injuries lasted more than six months and that she 

continues to suffer the residual effects of her injury. Id., ¶ 18. The case was assigned 

to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 15, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she 

“recommends that compensation be awarded in this case.” Respondent’s Rule 4(c) 

Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “has concluded that a preponderance of evidence 

establishes that the injury to petitioner’s right shoulder was caused-in-fact by the 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to 

post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 

note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2006).
2

administration of her September 24, 2013, flu vaccine, and that petitioner’s injury is not 

due to factors unrelated to the administration of the flu vaccine.” Id. at 3. Furthermore, 

respondent agrees that petitioner’s injury lasted for more than six months. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation.

s/Denise K. Vowell

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master
#### § 102-75.1240 Who, from the interested landholding agency, should submit the written response to GSA's “Notice of Availability”?

An authorized official of the landholding agency must sign the written response to the Notice of Availability. An “authorized official” is one who is responsible for acquisition and/or disposal decisions (e.g., head of the agency or official designee).
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.24

       DESCRIPTION OF EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN OVERHILL FARMS, INC.
                              AND JOHN L. STEINBRUN

     John L. Steinbrun, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Operating Officer, receives a base salary of $250,000 and a discretionary bonus
based on performance, as determined by Overhill Farms' board of directors. Mr.
Steinbrun receives an automobile allowance of $600 per month. On April 1, 2003,
Mr. Steinbrun was granted an immediately vested and exercisable five-year option
to purchase up to 50,000 shares of Overhill Farms' common stock at an exercise
price of $0.70 per share. On February 1, 2005, Mr. Steinbrun was granted options
to purchase up to 200,000 shares of Overhill Farms' common stock at per share
exercise prices ranging from $1.47 to $2.50. The options vested and became
exercisable on May 23, 2005.
#### § 102-5.95 Is the comfort and/or convenience of an employee considered sufficient justification to authorize home-to-work transportation?

No, the comfort and/or convenience of an employee is not considered sufficient justification to authorize home-to-work transportation.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

***CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

* *

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of American Science & Engineering, Inc., a Massachusettscorporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledgeand belief, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2003 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
|     /s/ Roger P. Heinisch         |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| *Roger P. Heinisch*                              |
| *Interim President and Chief  Executive Officer* |
|                                             |
| *August 13, 2003*                                |

 

1

----
§ 50-201.102 Overtime. ( a ) Employees engaged in or connected with the manufacture, fabrication, assembling, handling, supervision, or shipment of materials, supplies, articles, or equipment used in the performance of the contract may be employed in excess of 40 hours in any one week: *Provided,* Such persons shall be paid for any hours in excess of 40 hours in any one week the overtime rate of pay which has been set therefor by the Secretary of Labor.
( b ) Until otherwise set by the Secretary of Labor the rate of pay for such overtime shall be one and one-half times the basic hourly rate received by the employee. The “basic hourly rate” means an hourly rate equivalent to the rate upon which time-and-one-half overtime compensation may be computed and paid under section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended. The basic hourly rate may, in no case, be less than the applicable minimum wage.
( c ) If in any one week or part thereof an employee is engaged in work covered by the contract's stipulations, overtime shall be paid for any hours worked in excess of 40 hours in any one week at the overtime rate set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) The overtime pay requirements of this section shall be deemed to be complied with in the case of any employee employed as provided in section 7(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) or (2) of that section.
[7 FR 4494, June 16, 1942, as amended at 18 FR 1832, Apr. 2, 1953. Redesignated at 24 FR 10952, Dec. 30, 1959, as amended at 51 FR 12266, Apr. 9, 1986. Further redesignated at 61 FR 40716, Aug. 5, 1996]
§ 302-10.400 What policies must we establish for authorizing transportation of a mobile home? You must establish policies for authorizing transportation of a mobile home that implements this part including when: ( a ) It is considered in the best interest of the Government to assume direct responsibility for preparing and transporting an employee's mobile home;
( b ) To authorize an advance of funds for a commercial carrier transporting an employee's mobile home based on constructive or estimated cost when the employee assumes direct responsibility for payment.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2012-0085

Docket Number

2011-SW-004-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained 

in the Supplemental AD Docket

Sikorsky ASB No. No. 61B30-16, dated February 2, 1010

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-317-000]


Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

June 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 15, 2000, Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, 
LLC (MCGP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, revised tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the filing, 
proposed to be effective July 15, 2000.
    MCGP states that the purpose of this filing is to revise MCGP's 
Original Volume No. 1 FERC Gas Tariff to remove the maximum price cap 
or short-term capacity release transactions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16131 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Salvatore Torti *vs.*John S. Juchnik *et ux.*

DECEMBER 14, 1962

Present: Condon, C. J., Roberts, Paolino, Powers and Frost, JJ.

Condon, C. J.

This is a bill in equity to enjoin the respondents from entering upon certain premises situated at 34 Michael Drive in the city of Cranston, and from otherwise interfering with the possession of such premises by the complainant under an alleged agreement therefor between him and the respondents. Upon the filing of the bill an ex parte restraining order enjoining the respondents in accordance with the prayers of the bill was duly entered and the cause set down for hearing on the prayer for a preliminary injunction.

After such hearing in the superior court the trial justice found as a fact that there was an agreement entitling complainant to possession until certain amounts due to him from respondents were paid; that respondents were not actually in possession of the premises; and that there is due to complainant $6,552. Pursuant to such decision he entered a decree containing inter alia the above findings and an order expressly enjoining respondents from entering the premises or tampering with any part thereof. From this decree respondents appealed to this court.

Upon the entry of the appeal here complainant moved to dismiss it “for want of jurisdiction in .this-Court to hear said appeal.” At the hearing on this motion respondents interposed an offer to pay the amount of $5,250 due on the *275original contract and to post a bond with surety for payment of the amount of $1,302.05 in payment of respondents’ claim for alleged extras. This offer was accepted by complainant and thereafter an order embodying the same was duly entered in this court. Following the entry thereof the cause was subsequently further heard on its merits.

Under the respondents’ reason of appeal the only question remaining for our determination is whether the superior court’s decree granting the preliminary injunction was against the law. After examining the pleadings and the evidence we are of the opinion that there is no merit in the respondents’ appeal and that the trial justice did not err in any of his findings of fact.

The respondents’ appeal is denied and dismissed, the decree appealed from is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to the superior court for further proceedings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET  AND  STATEMENT  INCOME  FOR ANCHOR NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S FORM
10-Q  FOR  THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    4724111000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              0
<EQUITIES>                                 2542000
<MORTGAGE>                               689145000
<REAL-ESTATE>                             24000000
<TOTAL-INVEST>                          6141956000
<CASH>                                   261049000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                   901307000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         23763883000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                         6120165000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   3511000
<OTHER-SE>                               811940000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<PREMIUMS>                                       0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      381861000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                        17432000
<OTHER-INCOME>                           332640000
<BENEFITS>                               280525000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>               85061000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                      29766000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          196157000
<INCOME-TAX>                              86967000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      109190000
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             109190000
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          0


</TABLE>
#### § 302-3.303 May I claim reimbursement for the return of my immediate family member(s) or household goods more than once under one service agreement?

No, you cannot claim reimbursement for the return of your immediate family member(s) or household goods more than once under one service agreement.
#### § 105-53.112 General statement of functions.

The General Services Administration, as a major policy maker, provides guidance and direction to Federal agencies in a number of management fields. GSA formulates and prescribes a variety of Governmentwide policies relating to procurement and contracting; real and personal property management; transportation, public transportation, public utilities and telecommunications management; automated data processing management; records management; the use and disposal of property; and the information security program. In addition to its policy role, GSA also provides a variety of basic services in the aforementioned areas to other Government agencies. A summary description of these services is presented by organizational component in subpart B.

[54 FR 26741, June 26, 1989]