alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 302-8.3 How will I know when my agency has made a decision to authorize extended storage of my HHG?

Your agency will indicate on your travel authorization the specific allowances you are authorized as provided in this chapter.
#### § 102-79.85 What policy must Executive agencies follow concerning the placement of commercial antennas on Federal property?

Executive agencies will make antenna sites available on a fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory basis. Collocation of antennas should be encouraged where there are multiple antenna siting requests for the same location. In cases where this is not feasible and space availability precludes accommodating all antenna siting applicants, competitive procedures may be used. This should be done in accordance with applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations, and consistent with national security concerns. In making antenna sites available, agencies must avoid electromagnetic intermodulations and interferences. To the maximum extent practicable, when placing antennas for the provision of telecommunication services to the Federal Government, agencies should use redundant and physically separate entry points into the building and physically diverse local network facilities in accordance with guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget.
#### IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH E. WEATHERFORD, JR.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 763)

(387 SE2d 894)

Decided December 1, 1989.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Joe David Jackson, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Per curiam.

Joseph E. Weatherford, Jr., was indicted by the grand jury for the offense of forgery of a document purporting to be an order of a superior court. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced under the provisions of the first offender statute, Ga. L. 1968, p. 324. Weatherford filed a petition for voluntary discipline in the form of the surrender of his license to practice law.

The special master recommended that the petition be granted.

We agree. Voluntary surrender of a license is the equivalent to disbarment. Joseph E. Weatherford, Jr.’s application for the voluntary surrender of his license to practice law is granted.

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA FROM THE COMPANY'S GENERAL LEDGER
AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS FINANCIAL REPORT PACKAGE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,210
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,857
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,120
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     49,986
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        213,587
<ALLOWANCE>                                     (1,381)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 289,940
<DEPOSITS>                                     244,559
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             18,883
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,783
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 289,940
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,606
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,686
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   399
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,691
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,416
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,420
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,271
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 148
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,571
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,631
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,631
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.40
<LOANS-NON>                                        437
<LOANS-PAST>                                       140
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    22
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,050
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      439
<RECOVERIES>                                        70
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,381
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,381
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### § 300-2.70 How is the rule expressed in the title and narrative format?

The rule is in the narrative. The title serves only as a tool to determine the subject of the rule.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16504]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA--03881]


Johnson Controls, Incorporated, Goshen, Indiana; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on 
May 1, 2000 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at 
Johnson Controls, Incorporated, Goshen, Georgia.
    In a letter dated May 31, 2000, the petitioners requested that the 
petition for NAFTA-TAA be withdrawn. Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of June 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-16504 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### Thomas C. Scott et al., appellees, v. Joseph F. Cornish et al., appellants.

Filed April 3, 1895.

No. 6242.

Review: Dismissal op Appeal: Costs: Judgment Without-Finding. The appeal of a parly against whom alone the district court had found having heen dismissed, the right of the-remaining appellant to he relieved of costs is recognized in view of the fact that appellees have waived the want of a motion for such relief.

*377Appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Hopewell, J.

*Jacob Fawcett,*for appellants.

*J. W. Roudebush, contra.*

Ryan, C.

In this action the appeal of Joseph F. Cornish was dismissed for want of prosecution October 2, 1894. The rights of the other appellant, C. C. Stanley, are now presented for determination. The record discloses no finding whatever against the appellant last named, and the judgment against him was merely for costs. The appellees do not insist, as technically they might, that an alleged error in the taxation of costs, when that is the sole question made, should be presented in the district court by an appropriate motion. It is argued that since there were allegations in the petition that the contract- assailed thereby was obtained by fraud through a conspiracy between the appellants, the finding that Joseph F. Cornish was guilty of fraud, as charged in the petition, was, by direct implication, a finding that C. C. Stanley was likewise guilty. It seems to us that this is too far fetched, for the finding of fraud does not necessarily involve the existence of a conspiracy, especially as this affirmative finding was alone in respect to one individual, who by no possibility could be guilty of conspiracy with himself. The judgment of the district court against C. C. Stanley is therefore

Reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SOUTHWESTERN
PUBLIC SERVICE  COMPANY  BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>            1,729,339
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>            124,627
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                 117,537
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>               158,361
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       2,129,864
<COMMON>                                     0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>              348,402
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                    389,818
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>         738,220
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  100,000
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                   530,618
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                       9,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                    0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>          85,162
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>           90,113
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                    0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                  0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                             0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>         576,751
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>        2,129,864
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>              951,187
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                    65,696
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>             719,812
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>             785,508
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                165,679
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                       7,611
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>         173,290
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                58,303
<NET-INCOME>                           114,987
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>          114,987
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                75,157
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>               54,321
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                 258,449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.000
        

</TABLE>
# Comments on: 22-1359: HAMPTON v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION], Precedential
28 January 2016

418P15

#### Marcus Larent Henderson v. Harnett County District Court Jacqualyn L. Lee

Pit’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Denied
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

EVAPCO DRY COOLING, INC.,

Appellant

v.

SPG DRY COOLING USA LLC,

Appellee

______________________

2023-1105, 2023-1106

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-

00687, IPR2021-00688.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties, having so agreed, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The above-captioned appeals are dismissed under Fed. 

R. App. P. 42(b) with each side to bear their own costs.

February 27, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: February 27, 2024

Case: 23-1105 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 02/27/2024
[Crim. No. 391.

Fourth Appellate District.

November 16, 1939.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JESUS VARGAS, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney-General, and John P. Knauf, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

MARKS, J. —

This is a motion to affirm the judgment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code.

. The clerk’s and reporter’s transcripts were filed in the office of the clerk of this court on October 16, 1939. The case was placed for argument on the calendar of November *47614, 1939. No brief or appearance has been filed or made for defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.

Barnard, P. J., and Griffin, J., concurred.
§ 51-3.2 Responsibilities under the AbilityOne Program. Each central nonprofit agency shall: ( a ) Represent its participating nonprofit agencies in dealing with the Committee under the JWOD Act.
( b ) Evaluate the qualifications and capabilities of its nonprofit agencies and provide the Committee with pertinent data concerning its nonprofit agencies, their status as qualified nonprofit agencies, their manufacturing or service capabilities, and other information concerning them required by the Committee.
( c ) Obtain from Federal contracting activities such procurement information as is required by the Committee to: ( 1 ) Determine the suitability of a commodity or service being recommended to the Committee for addition to the Procurement List; or
( 2 ) Establish an initial fair market price for a commodity or service or make changes in the fair market price.
( d ) Recommend to the Committee, with the supporting information required by Committee procedures, suitable commodities or services for procurement from its nonprofit agencies.
( e ) Recommend to the Committee, with the supporting information required by Committee procedures, initial fair market prices for commodities or services proposed for addition to the Procurement List.
( f ) Distribute within the policy guidelines of the Committee (by direct allocation, subcontract, or any other means) orders from Government activities among its nonprofit agencies.
( g ) Maintain the necessary records and data on its nonprofit agencies to enable it to allocate orders equitably.
( h ) Oversee and assist its nonprofit agencies to insure contract compliance in furnishing a commodity or a service.
( i ) As market conditions change, recommend price changes with appropriate justification for assigned commodities or services on the Procurement List.
( j ) Monitor and assist its nonprofit agencies to meet the statutory and regulatory requirements to fully participate in the program. Conduct assistance visits with its nonprofits as necessary and provide the Committee with the results and recommendations of such visits.
( k ) When authorized by the Committee, enter into contracts with Federal contracting activities for the furnishing of commodities or services provided by its nonprofit agencies.
( l ) At the time designated by the Committee, submit a completed, original copy of the appropriate Initial Certification (Committee Form 401 or 402) for the nonprofit agency concerned. This requirement does not apply to a nonprofit agency that is already authorized to furnish a commodity or service under the JWOD Act.
( m ) Review and forward to the Committee by December 1 of each year a completed original copy of the appropriate Annual Certification (Committee Form 403 or 404) for each of its participating nonprofit agencies covering the fiscal year ending the preceding September 30.
( n ) Perform other JWOD administrative functions, including activities to increase Government and public awareness of the JWOD Act subject to the oversight of the Committee.
[56 FR 48979, Sept. 26, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 59342, Nov. 16, 1994; 62 FR 32237, June 13, 1997; 68 FR 53684, Sept. 12, 2003; 73 FR 28043, May 15, 2008]
#### §§ 51-10.141-51-10.148 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        69,971,519
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  17,141,411
<MORTGAGE>                                      15,706
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              87,128,636
<CASH>                                       3,849,844
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          18,698,549
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       9,587,331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             153,180,060
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             53,962,673
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         36,812,517
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                454,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,541,351
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,022,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               153,180,060
<PREMIUMS>                                  48,585,717
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          3,254,544
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             636,563
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 617,397
<BENEFITS>                                  34,751,112
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        17,973,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                369,929
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (96,201)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            466,130
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   466,130
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 101-26.309 Cancellation of orders for GSA stock items.

When an agency determines that material ordered from GSA is not required, GSA will accept requests for cancellation as long as the items ordered have not been shipped. However, since processing cancellations is costly and interferes with normal order processing, agencies are cautioned to use discretion in requesting cancellation of low dollar value orders. Cancellation of orders may be accomplished by agencies through written, telegraphic, or telephonic communication with the GSA regional office to which the order was sent. However, telephonic communication should be used whenever feasible to forestall shipment of material and subsequent billing by GSA. If material has been shipped, GSA will advise that cancellation cannot be effected and agency requests for return for credit will be processed under the provisions of §§ 101-26.310 and 101-26.311.

[32 FR 11163, Aug. 1, 1967]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4265 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4265

   To enhance fairness in compensating owners of patents used by the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1994

  Mr. Frost introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To enhance fairness in compensating owners of patents used by the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUST COMPENSATION.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 1498(a) of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end of the first paragraph the following: 
``Reasonable and entire compensation shall include the owner's 
reasonable costs in pursuing the action.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to actions brought under section 1498(a) of title 28, United 
States Code, on or after January 1, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
46942.

#### GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE CORPORATION v. MAYACAMAS CORPORATION.

(385 SE2d 412)

Decided September 11, 1989

Reconsideration denied October 4, 1989.

*Adams, Gardner, Ellis, Inglesby & Falligant, Brent J. Savage, Thomas R. Nash, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Oliver, Maner & Gray, James L. Pannell, Wendy Woods Williamson,*for appellee.

Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter *(Mayacamas Corp. v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.,*190 Ga. App. 892 (380 SE2d 303) (1989)), it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari, and the writ is therefore vacated.

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 0.409 Commission policy on private printing of FCC forms. The Commission has established a policy regarding the printing of blank FCC forms by private companies if they elect to do so as a matter of expediency and convenience to their clients or consumers. The policy is as follows: ( a ) Blank FCC forms may be reproduced by private companies at their own expense provided the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) Use a printing process resulting in a product that is at least comparable in quality to the original document, without change to the page size, image size, configuration of pages, folds or perforations, and matching as closely as possible the paper weight, paper color and ink color.
( 2 ) Delete in its entirety any and all U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) indicia that may appear in the margin(s).
( 3 ) If the printer wishes to identify a foreign country in which the forms are printed, a marginal notation must be added stating “No U.S. Government funds were used to print this document.”
( 4 ) Do not add to the form any other symbol, word or phrase that might be construed as personalizing the form or advertising on it.
( 5 ) Except as specified above, do not delete from or add to any part of the form, or attach anything thereto.
( 6 ) Assure that the form being reproduced is an edition currently acceptable by the Commission, which will endeavor to keep the public advised of revisions to its forms, but cannot assume responsibility to the extent of eliminating any element of risk against the use of obsolete forms.
( b ) These guidelines do not apply to forms which respondents may wish to reproduce as completed facsimiles on automated equipment to satisfy application or report requirements. Requests for permission to submit such forms to the Commission should be addressed to the Office of Managing Director.
[53 FR 27861, July 25, 1988]