alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
21250
    Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 800

    Torrance, CA 90503

    Tel    310.214.0065

    Fax    310.214.0075

    www.emmauslifesciences.com









 


February
6, 2017


 


 


Joseph
Moscato


Generex
Biotechnology Corporation


President
& Chief Executive Officer


4145
North Service Road, Suite 200


Burlington,
Ontario


Canada
L7L 6A3


 


Dear
Mr. Moscato,


 


Reference
is made to that binding Letter of Intent dated January 16, 2017 between Emmaus Life Sciences, Inc. ("Emmaus") and Generex
Biotechnology Corporation ("Generex") (the "LOI").


 


The
LOI at section 1.c provides that Generex shall pay One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) to Emmaus within three
(3) weeks of January 16, 2017, which is today, February 6, 2017. You have informed us that Generex will not be able to make this
payment, which constitutes a breach of the LOI by Generex.


 


At
your request, we have agreed to waive the breach of the LOI for a period of ten days, until February 16, 2017. The foregoing waiver
shall not be deemed or constitute a waiver of any of the other provisions of the LOI, whether or not similar to such clause, nor
shall the foregoing waiver constitute a continuing waiver extending beyond February 16, 2017.


 





	 	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	Chairman & CEO, EMMAUS LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
<PAGE>
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into all Registration
Statements on Form 10-KSB of Scotland Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated October
23, 1997, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of
Scotland Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of September 30, 1997 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows
for the years then ended, which report appears in the Company's 1997 annual
report on Form 10-KSB.


McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

/s/ McGLADREY & PULLEN,LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
December 16, 1997
```

[House Report 106-574]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-574

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 94, THE TAX 
                  LIMITATION CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

                                _______
                                

   April 11, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 471]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 471, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of House 
Joint Resolution 94, the Tax Limitation Constitutional 
Amendment, under a modified closed rule. The rule provides two 
hours of debate in the House divided equally between the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 
Judiciary.
    The resolution provides for consideration of an amendment 
printed in the Congressional Record if offered by the Minority 
Leader or his designee, which shall be considered as read and 
shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent. Finally, the rule 
provides for one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.

                                  

```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 1 9 , 2024

NO. 03

- 24

- 00094

- CV

Abibou Oyeyiola , Appellant

v.

Daniel Hudsky , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHI EF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTIC ES TRIANA A ND KEL LY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

–

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the jud gment signed by the tr i a l court on February 1, 2024 . Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that Abibou Oyeyiola has not prosecuted his appeal and did

not comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal

f

or want o f prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication

of costs is made.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6725-2] 

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) teleconference meeting scheduled for Monday, June 26, 2000 from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time has been rescheduled to Wednesday, July 5, 2000. The purpose of the teleconference meeting is to review a report developed by its Technical Subcommittee on Fine Particle Monitoring. The meeting will be coordinated through a conference call connection in Room 6013 in the USEPA, Ariel Rios Building North, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460. Other than the change in date, no other changes in the details of the meeting have been made. Details are contained in 65 FR 36691, June 9, 2000. 

Dated: June 21, 2000.

A. Robert Flaak,

Acting Staff Director, Science Advisory Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-16165 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,697]

                    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on May 22, 2000, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Scientific Research Company, Portland, Oregon.                          ( print page 40139)    

The company official submitting the petition has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 2nd day of June, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-16496  Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Miyoko Sakashita 

Oceans Director 

Center for Biological Diversity 

1212 Broadway, Suite 800 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Dear Ms. Sakashita: 

JUL 10 2015 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

I am writing to confirm that on June 30,2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency received a 

petition from the Center for Biological Diversity and Donn J. Viviani, Ph.D., requesting that EPA 

promulgate regulations pursuant to Section 6 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to protect 

"public health and the environment from the serious harms associated with anthropogenic emissions of 

carbon dioxide, including ocean acidification." The petition alternately requests that EPA "adopt a rule 

under section 4 of [TSCA] requiring manufacturers and processors responsible for the generation of 

carbon dioxide to undertake testing to determine toxicity, persistence, and other characteristics which 

affect health and the environment and are necessary to determine if there is an unreasonable risk of 

injury to health and the environment." 

Your petition has been filed pursuant to TSCA Section 21 , which provides that within 90 days after the 

date of filing, or September 27, 2015, for your petition, the Administrator shall either grant or deny the 

petition. Section 21 of TSCA further provides that if the Administrator grants such petition, then the 

Administrator shall promptly commence an appropriate proceeding. Section 21 of TSCA also provides 

that if the Administrator denies such petition, then the Administrator shall publish in the Federal 

Register the Administrator's reasons for such denial. 

If you have any questions relating to your petition or EPA's guidelines for TSCA Section 2 1 petitions, 

please contact Mike Mattheisen by telephone at (202) 564-3077 or by email at 

mattheisen.mike@epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

U)~C'~ Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, Director 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

cc: Dr. Donn J. Viviani 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted w1th Vegetable 011 Based Inks on 100% Postconsvmer. Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper
# Comments on: 22-1098: ULTRAVISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. GOVISION, LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential
No. 11-9160.

#### Reilly, aka Riley *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9296.

#### Holly *v.*Epps, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
58 © 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 

© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved.

The content is subject to change.

Download the latest version from

http://www.dji.com/phantom3

If you have any questions about this document, please contact DJI by 

sending a message to DocSupport@dji.com.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of AML Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



Dated:
June 30, 2003

|                                                                 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/JACOB INBARJacob Inbar, President and
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---

QuickLinks
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 16296A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–7368

Mr. Kyle Falwell

Management Member

Bon Air Drone, LLC

4132 Richmond Highway

Lynchburg, VA 24501

Dear Mr. Falwell:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated May 18, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Bon Air Drone, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to your 

current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 

61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and 

(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the 

petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You requested an amendment to change the company 

name from Bon Air Brokerage, LLC to Bon Air Drone, LLC.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 16296

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 
2

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Bon Air Drone, LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator. All 

conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 16296 remain in effect. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16500]



[[Page 40140]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA--3866]


Furniture Crafters, Grants Pass, Oregon; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on April 24, 2000, in response to a worker petition which 
was filed by a company official on behalf of its workers at Furniture 
Crafters, Grants Pass, Oregon.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 9th day of June, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-16500 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4192

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 3000 Veterans Drive in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands,

as the ‘‘Arturo R. Watlington, Sr. Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4192 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Post Office building located at

3 3000 Veterans Drive in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Arturo R.

5 Watlington, Sr. Post Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the Arturo R. Watlington, Sr. Post Office.

Passed the House of Representatives September 19,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
§ 302-6.205 Must we require transferees to sign a statement that TQSE will be incurred? ( a ) Transferees authorized TQSE-LP or TQSE-AE are not required to sign a statement asserting that they will occupy temporary quarters since they must document temporary quarters lodging expenses.
( b ) Transferees electing the TQSE-LS payment option if offered by you, must sign a statement, which should be included as part of the service agreement, asserting that they will occupy temporary quarters and will incur TQSE. If a lump sum amount was paid, and if no TQSE are incurred, the transferee must return all monies received for the TQSE-LS payment to the agency.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 740

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny employers a deduction

for payments of excessive compensation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. SABO (for himself, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. NADLER, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia,

Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. STARK, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. OLVER, Mr. TIERNEY,

Mrs. CHRISTIAN-CHRISTENSEN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. SANDERS, Mr.

CONYERS, Mr. VENTO, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. GEORGE MILLER

of California, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. NORTON,

Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. EVANS, Mr. WYNN, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, and Mr.

BROWN of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny employers a deduction for payments of excessive compensation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Income Equity Act

5 of 1999’’.
2

•HR 740 IH

1 SEC. 2. DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR PAYMENTS OF EXCES2 SIVE COMPENSATION.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 162 of the Internal Reve4 nue Code of 1986 (relating to deduction for trade or busi5 ness expenses) is amended by inserting after subsection

6 (h) the following new subsection:

7 ‘‘(i) EXCESSIVE COMPENSATION.—

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No deduction shall be al9 lowed under this chapter for any excessive com10 pensation with respect to any full-time employee.

11 ‘‘(2) EXCESSIVE COMPENSATION.—For pur12 poses of this subsection, the term ‘excessive com13 pensation’ means, with respect to any employee, the

14 amount by which—

15 ‘‘(A) the compensation for services per16 formed by such employee during the taxable

17 year, exceeds

18 ‘‘(B) an amount equal to 25 times the low19 est compensation for services performed by any

20 other full-time employee during such taxable

21 year.

22 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS AND SPECIAL RULES.—For

23 purposes of this subsection—

24 ‘‘(A) COMPENSATION.—
3

•HR 740 IH

1 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘com2 pensation’ means salary, wages, and bo3 nuses.

4 ‘‘(ii) PART-YEAR EMPLOYEES.—In the

5 case of any part-year employee, the com6 pensation of the employee shall be com7 puted on an annualized basis.

8 ‘‘(B) EMPLOYER.—All persons treated as a

9 single employer under subsection (a) or (b) of

10 section 52 or subsection (m) or (o) of section

11 414 shall be treated as 1 employer.’’

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

14 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 22

- 13037 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus SAMUEL ALEXANDER GLOVER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 5:21

- cr
- 00033

- JA

- PRL

- 2

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-13037 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 10/11/2023 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 22

- 13037

Before J ILL P RYOR , N EWSOM , and B RANCH , Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

- 51 (11th Cir. 1993) ( holding that a sentence

- appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb , 451 F.3d 1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (holding that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal a sentence on the ground that its length, which was below the statutory maximum, was cruel and unusual under the Eighth Amendment)

. USCA11 Case: 22-13037 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 10/11/2023 Page: 2 of 2
No. 11-9487.

#### Eligwe et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 10, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Lois Berthaume, Vice President), 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:                 

*1. Lamar Capital Corporation,*                     Purvis, Mississippi; to acquire Lamar Data Solutions, Inc., Purvis, Mississippi, and thereby engage in data processing and data transmission activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(14) of Regulation Y.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 20, 2000.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 00-15982 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P