alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL00-84-000]

Take notice that on June 13, 2000, Prairieland Energy, Inc. (Prairieland) filed a petition pursuant to Rule 207 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207, requesting the Commission to disclaim jurisdiction over Prairieland as a “public utility”, as that latter term is defined in Section 201(e) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C.A. § 824(e).

In its petition, Prairieland states that it intends to engage in wholesale electric power and energy purchases and sales as a marketing company. Prairieland is a corporation wholly-owned by The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, a body corporate and politic of the State of Illinois.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before July 5, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www,ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16272 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE FRANK TOPPO

______________________ 

2013-1077

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 

11/491,718. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

SEAN A. PASSINO, Lowe Hauptman, Ham & Berner, 

LLP, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellant. With 

him on the brief were BENJAMIN J. HAUPTMAN and 

BENJAMIN P. KOTA. 

AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, 

argued for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN 

K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and JAMIE L. SIMPSON, 

Associate Solicitor.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, BRYSON, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 June 13, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-1203.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Missiles 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and 

OTHER GOVERNMENTS 

Signed at Koblenz, The Hague, and 

Washington, October 20, October 21, and 

December 3, 2004 

with 

Annexes 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 MULTILATERAL 

 Defense: Missiles 

 Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Koblenz, The Hague, and 

 Washington, October 20, October 21, 

 and December 3, 2004; 

 Entered into force December 3, 2004. 

 With annexes.
#### § 102-75.1040 May Federal agencies abandon or destroy improvements on land or related personal property before public notice is given of such proposed abandonment or destruction?

Except as provided in § 102-75.1045, a Federal agency must not abandon or destroy improvements on land or related personal property until after it has given public notice of the proposed abandonment or destruction. This notice must be given in the area in which the property is located, must contain a general description of the property to be abandoned or destroyed, and must include an offering of the property for sale. A copy of the notice must be given to the GSA regional property disposal office for the region in which the property is located.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  quarter  ended  March 31,  2011 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Lawrence A. Sala,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lawrence A. Sala
--------------------
Lawrence A. Sala
President and Chief Executive Officer
________________________

Date: April 29, 2011

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren,  Inc. and will be retained by Anaren,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       26
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anaren,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  quarter  ended  March 31,  2011 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George A. Blanton, Sr.
Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ George A. Blanton
---------------------
George A. Blanton
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
__________________________

Date: April 29, 2011

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anaren,  Inc. and will be retained by Anaren,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       27
EXHIBIT
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ending May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen C. Donnelly, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Stephen C. DonnellyChief
                Financial OfficerJuly
                14, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 26, 2009 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|--------------------- | --------------------
|                      | John P. Manning     
|                      | Director, President 
|                      | (Principal Executive
|                      | Officer), BCTC IV   
|                      | Assignor Corp.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO. 22-cv-24013-RNS 

CHENMING ZHOU, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED 

ON SCHEDULE “A”, 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF FILING UNDER SEAL DECLARATION OF 

PLAINTIFF CHENMING ZHOU 

Plaintiff Chenming Zhou (“Plaintiff”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby notices 

his filing under seal, pursuant to Court Order (ECF No. 7), of Declaration of Plaintiff in Support 

of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Entry of Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction 

and Order Restraining Transfer of Assets. 

Respectfully Submitted this 20th day of December, 2022. 

LAW FIRM OF RUBIO & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

8950 SW 74 Ct., Suite 1804 

Miami, Fl 33156 

Telephone: (786) 220-2061 

Facsimile: (786) 220-2062 

Email: hrubio@rubiolegal.com 

Email: frubio@rubiolegal.com 

Email: apuentes@rubiolegal.cm 

Email: info@rubiolegal.com 

By:/s/ Humberto Rubio 

Humberto Rubio, Jr., Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 36433 

Felipe Rubio, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 123059 

M. Arabella Puentes, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 26825 

Case 1:22-cv-24013-RNS Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/20/2022 Page 1 of 1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T C L I F F OR D B R OD S KY , P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. AN THON Y P. KA NE, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 16804 D . C. N o . CV - 0 6 - 0 2 2 8 8 - CRB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C ha r l e s R . B r e y e r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e par ol ee C l i ff ord B rodsky appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct court ’ s deni alof hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4 h abea s pet i t i on . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JU N 6 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 16804 2 B r o d s k yc o n te n d s th a t b e c au s e h e p le dn o c o n te s t to c o n s p ir a c yto c o m m it s e c o n d - d e g r e e m u r d e r , r a th e rth a n c o n s p ir a c yto c o m m it f ir s t- d e g r e e m u r d e r , h is pl e aa gr e e m e nta nd c ons t i tut i ona l r i ght s w e r e vi ol a t e d w he n the B oa r d of P r i s on T e rm s r e l i e d on c e rt a i n i nf orm a t i on t o de nyhi m pa r ol e i n 2003. T he C a l i f

orni aC ourtof

A ppe a l ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha tthe B oa r d of P r i s on T erm s w as no tconstra i ned b y the pl eaagre em entw as no tcontraryt o, or an unr e a s onabl e appl i c a t i on of , c l e a r l ye s t abl i s he d f

e de r a l l a w a s de t e rm i ne d bythe S up r e m e C o u rt, a n dw a s n o t b a s e do n a n u n r e a s o n ab le d e te rm in a tio n o f th e f a c ts . See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 ( d ) ; P e nr yv . J ohns on , 5 3 2 U .S . 7 8 2 , 7 9 2 - 9 3 ( 2 0 0 1 ) . B r o d s k y ’ s du e p r o c e s s c l a i m i s n o tc o g n i z ab l e o n f e d e r a l h ab e a s r e v i e w. Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 1 3 1 S . C t. 8 5 9 , 8 6 3 ( 2 0 1 1 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . T o th e e x te n t B r o d s k yr a is e s ac la im th a t h is p le aw a s in v o lu n ta ry , th a t c la im i s be l i e d bythe r e c or d. AF F I RME D.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-3482

___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Bradley Levi Petermann,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.

____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Southern District of Iowa - Council Bluffs

____________

Submitted: September 23, 2019

Filed: December 17, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Bradley Petermann pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful possession of a

firearm as a prohibited person, namely, a previously convicted felon and an unlawful

user of a controlled substance. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 922(g)(3), 924(a)(2). The
district court1

calculated an advisory guideline range of 70 to 87 months’

imprisonment, and ultimately imposed a term of 37 months’ imprisonment after a

departure under the guidelines and a variance under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Petermann

appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court committed procedural error in

applying a four-level increase under the guidelines for possessing a firearm in

connection with another felony offense. We conclude that there was no error and

therefore affirm.

In calculating Petermann’s advisory guideline range, the district court applied

a four-level increase under USSG § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) on the ground that Petermann

“possessed any firearm . . . in connection with another felony offense.” The other

felony offense was “carrying weapons” in violation of Iowa Code § 724.4. That

provision proscribes going armed with a dangerous weapon concealed on or about the

person, going armed with a pistol or revolver or any loaded firearm, whether

concealed or not, within the limits of any city, and knowingly carrying or transporting

a pistol or revolver in a vehicle. The offense is punishable by up to two years’

imprisonment, see Iowa Code § 903.1(2), and thus qualifies as a felony within the

meaning of the guideline. USSG § 2K2.1, comment. (n.1). Because police found a

loaded nine-millimeter firearm on the driver’s side floorboard of a vehicle that

Petermann was driving when stopped for speeding in Council Bluffs, Iowa, the court

found that he had possessed the firearm in connection with a violation of Iowa Code

§ 724.4. 

Petermann conceded in the district court and acknowledges on appeal that the

four-level increase was proper under this court’s decision in United States v. Walker,

771 F.3d 449 (8th Cir. 2014), although he contendsthat Walker was wrongly decided. 

We agree with the district court that Walker is directly on point, and that

1The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa.

-2-
§ 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) is therefore applicable. There was no error in calculating the

advisory guideline range, and the judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

-3-
3760 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2000 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service

Surety Companies Acceptable on

Federal Bonds: Suretec Insurance

Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service,

Fiscal Service, Department of the

Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 11 to

the Treasury Department Circular 570;

1999 Revision, published July 1, 1999,

at 64 FR 35864.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874–7102.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A

Certificate of Authority as an acceptable

surety on Federal bonds is hereby

issued to the following Company under

31 U.S.C. 9304 to 9308. Federal bondapproving officers should annotate their

reference copies of the Treasury Circular

570, 1999 Revision, on page 35889 to

reflect this addition: Suretec Insurance

Company. Business address: 10000

Memorial Drive, Suite 330, Houston, TX

77024. Phone: (713) 812–0800.

Underwriting limitation b/: $307,000.

Surety licenses c/: TX. Incorporated in:

Texas.

Certificates of Authority expire on

June 30 each year, unless revoked prior

to that date. The Certificates are subject

to subsequent annual renewal as long as

the companies remain qualified (31 CFR

Part 223). A list of qualified companies

is published annually as of July 1 in

Treasury Department Circular 570, with

details as to underwriting limitations,

areas in which licensed to transact

surety business and other information.

The Circular may be viewed and

downloaded through the Internet at

http:/www.fms.treas.gov/c570/

index.html. A hard copy may be

purchased from the Government

Printing Office (GPO) Subscription

Service, Washington, DC, Telephone

(202) 512–1800. When ordering the

Circular from GPO, use the following

stock number: 048000–00527–6.

Questions concerning this Notice may

be directed to the U.S. Department of

the Treasury, Financial Management

Service, Financial Accounting and

Services Division, Surety Bond Branch,

3700 East-West Highway, Room 6A04,

Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: January 12, 2000.

Wanda J. Rogers,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services

Division, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 00–1623 Filed 1–21–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810–35–M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Dinesh R. Desai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Dinesh R. Desai 
    Chief Executive Officer 
     April 23, 2007




---