alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7821

EDWIN CHRISTOPHER LAWING , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. CARLOS HERNANDEZ, Superintendent , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:19

- hc

- 02258

- D )

Submitted : February 28, 2022 Decided: March 30, 2022

Before KING and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Edwin Christopher Lawing , Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Porter Babb, Sr., Special Deputy Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, Nort h Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Edwin Christopher Lawing se eks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unle ss a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the d istrict court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2 017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lawing has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil ity and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
No. 11-9450.

#### Hernandez-Luna *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136172 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. GLEN SMILEY, DONNA SMILEY, RICHARD Stephen J. Markman, L. HURFORD, JUDI HURFORD, MALCOM J. Justices
 

SUTHERLAND, JULIE T. SUTHERLAND,
 

COLTON P. WEATHERSPOON, DEBORAH J. 

WEATHERSPOON, BRIT GORDON, ANN 

GORDON, CURTIS MARSH, JUDI MARSH, 

DAVID E. SORGE, MADALYNNE SORGE, 

WILLIAM H. DANCE, NICK SPAIN, SALLY 

SPAIN, THERESE CARDOZE, RICHARD C. 

CARDOZE, TODD V. CALLEWAERT, 

JENNIFER S. CALLEWAERT, ANTHONY 

PADDOCK, DARBY PADDOCK, MARGARET
 

FERINGA, HELEN P. THURBER, ROY 

LOMBARDO, SALLY LOMBARDO, NILA L. 

CARTER, DAVID FITZSIMONS, JR., HOLLY 

FITZSIMONS, ROBERT OLLISON and 

DEMPSEY OLLISON,

Plaintiff-Appellees, 

v SC: 136172 

 COA: 275937 

Wayne CC: 06-617425-CZ

GROSSE POINTE WAR MEMORIAL 

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001021 10-AUG-2015 10:48 AM

SCWC-12-0001021 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I RICHARD M. RUH, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs. STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0001021; S.P.P. NO. 12-1-0003) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on June 29, 2015, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, August 10, 2015. Jeffrey A. Hawk for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                           NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED    THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED
                                     ----------------------    -----------------------
                                      March 3,   February 26,   March 3,  February 26,
                                       2001         2000         2001        2000
                                     ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------
<S>                                  <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>
Net income (loss) for computing
  Income (loss) per common share     $ (12,494)   $ (39,938)   $   6,513   $ (77,740)
                                     =========    =========    =========   =========

Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding
   during each period                  834,081      840,962      833,520     839,457
                                     =========    =========    =========   =========

Net income (loss) per common share   $  (0.015)   $  (0.047)   $   0.008   $  (0.093)
                                     =========    =========    =========   =========
</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

 

CorePower Yoga, LLC, CorePower § 

Yoga Franchising LLC, § 

 § 

 Defendants Below, § No. 109, 2022 

 Appellants, § 

 § 

 v. § Court Below—Court of Chancery 

 § of the State of Delaware 

Level 4 Yoga, LLC, § 

 § 

Plaintiff Below, § C.A. No. 2020-0249 

 Appellee, § 

 Submitted: October 19, 2022 

 Decided: November 2, 2022 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER 

 This 2nd day of November 2022, after careful consideration of the parties’ 

briefs and the record below, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the 

judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the 

reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion dated March 1, 2022 and Order dated 

March 22, 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
No. 10-11264.

#### Huffman *v.*Florida et al.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.
326P15

#### Burl Anderson Howell v. North Carolina Wayne County Department of Health and Human Services, by and through, Resee Phelps; Lou Jones

1. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Office of Administrative Hearings

1. Dismissed

2. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pawperis*

2. Allowed
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Performanceand accountability report**** 
SuDocNumber:NAS1.1/10:
ItemNumber:0830-C-26(online)
CGPsystem Number:000591703
 
2002
2003
2004

2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
 **
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Charles Ellis Shirley, Appellant

No. 06-16-00089-CV v.

Warden Tovi Butcher and The Texas 

Department of Criminal Justice, Appellees

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CV-16-

42887). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Charles Ellis Shirley, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 27, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
No. 10-11252.

#### Espino-Rangel *v.*Hollingsworth, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Angelica Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James W. Shaffer, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

            (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly
                      presents, in all material respects, the financial
                      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  September 8, 2005

                                   /s/ James W. Shaffer
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   James W. Shaffer
                                   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1996
<CASH>                                      38,947,895
<SECURITIES>                                 3,927,276
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,946,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (806,300)
<INVENTORY>                                 17,669,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            78,109,893
<PP&E>                                       4,946,839
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,486,091)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              88,309,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,809,529
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    96,978,776
<OTHER-SE>                                (21,479,162)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                88,309,143
<SALES>                                    100,644,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           100,644,167
<CGS>                                       70,852,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,886,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (551,351)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,456,372
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,593,280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,863,092
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,863,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
        

</TABLE>
403P15

#### State v. James Earl Parker

Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Denied
#### § 301-52.13 Should I keep itemized records of my expenses while on travel?

Yes. You will find it helpful to keep a record of your expenses by date of the expense to aid you in preparing your travel claim or for tax purposes.
§ 51-9.501 Reporting requirement. ( a ) No later than 30 days prior to the establishment of a new systems of records, the Executive Director shall submit a copy of the proposal to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget for their evaluation of the probable or potential effect of such proposal on the privacy and other personal or property rights of individuals of the disclosure of information relating to such individuals.
( b ) No later than 30 days prior to the alteration of a system of records, the Executive Director for the maintenance of that system of records shall submit a copy of the proposal to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget for their evaluation of the probable or potential effect of such proposal on the privacy and other personal or property rights of individuals of the disclosure of information relating to such individuals.
EX-10.76



 Exhibit 10.76 

WRITTEN CONSENT 
 This Written Consent is
provided as of September 1, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), by Republic Bank & Trust Company, a Kentucky banking corporation (“RB”) to Elevate@Work, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“E@W”) pursuant to Section 2(f) of the Amended and Restated Joint Marketing Agreement entered into as of July 1, 2015 between RB and E@W (the “Agreement”). 

 

	1.	Except as provided in this Written Consent, all capitalized terms used herein will have the meanings attributed to them in the Agreement. 


 

	2.	Pursuant to Section 2(f) of the Agreement, E@W shall use good faith efforts to limit marketing of the Accounts so that the maximum aggregate principal amount of Accounts outstanding under the Program (on a
fully-advanced basis) during the calendar year 2016 does not exceed [****] (the “Limit”), without the prior written consent of RB. 

  

	3.	By virtue of this Written Consent, RB hereby consents to E@W increasing the Limit to [****]. 

  

	4.	It is understood and agreed by the parties that all other terms and conditions of the Agreement and all related documentation, shall remain in full force and effect and, to the extent not inconsistent with the terms
agreed to herein, shall also apply to this Written Consent. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, RB has executed this Written Consent to be binding
as of the Effective Date set forth above, regardless of the actual date of the execution and delivery hereof. 
  

			
	By:
	
	REPUBLIC BANK & TRUST COMPANY
		
	By:	 	/s/ William R. Nelson
	Name:	 	William R. Nelson
	Title:	 	President
	
	Acknowledged By:
	
	ELEVATE@WORK, LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Kenneth E. Rees
	Name:	 	Kenneth E. Rees
	Title:	 	CEO


  
 [****] = CERTAIN
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, HAS BEEN
OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT
TO RULE 406 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED.
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Ran Oz, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 20-F of NICE Systems Ltd.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 

Date: June 29, 2005

 
|   | By:                                          |   /s/ Ran Oz |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------|
|   |   Ran Oz, Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jennifer Dawson, Chief Financial Officer of Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By:    | /s/ Jennifer Dawson    
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Jennifer Dawson        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | June 26, 2009          

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Optional Form 306 (Declaration for Federal Employment) is used by OPM and other agencies to collect information to determine an individual's acceptability for Federal employment and enrollment status in the Government's Life Insurance program. We plan to add the following questions about Selective Service Registration, which are currently on the Applicant's Statement of Selective Service Registration to the Optional Form 306: “If you are a male born after December 31, 1959, and are at least 18 years of age, civil service employment law (5 U.S.C. 3328) requires you must register with the Selective Service System, unless you meet certain exemptions. Are you a male born after December 31, 1959? Yes_____ No_____ Have you registered with the Selective Service? Yes_____ No_____. If No, describe your reason(s) in item 16.” 

We estimate 474,000 forms will be completed annually. Each form takes approximately 15 minutes to complete. The annual estimated burden is 118,500 hours. 

To obtain copies of this proposal please contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey at (202) 606-8358, or Fax (202) 418-3251, or by e-mail to mbtoomey@opm.gov. 

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received on or before July 21, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to: 

                        Richard A. Ferris, Associate Director for Investigations, Office of Personnel                               ( print page 38613)                            Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 5416, Washington, DC 20415-4000                    

   and 

Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

Janice R. Lachance, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-15643 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-01-P