alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001004232
<NAME> CYBERCASH,INC.
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      10,902,532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,712,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,050,835
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,511,863
<PP&E>                                      15,807,957
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,757,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,324,471
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,730,266
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,130
<OTHER-SE>                                  87,575,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                93,324,471
<SALES>                                     12,587,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,587,603
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,775,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (30,944,448)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (30,944,448)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (30,944,448)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.15)
        

</TABLE>
§ 105-55.017 Use and disclosure of mailing addresses. ( a ) When attempting to locate a debtor in order to collect or compromise a debt under this part or other authority, the General Services Administration (GSA) may send a request to the Secretary (or designee) to obtain a debtor's mailing address from the records of the Internal Revenue Service.
( b ) GSA is authorized to use mailing addresses obtained under paragraph (a) of this section to enforce collection of a delinquent debt and may disclose such mailing addresses to other agencies and to collection agencies for collection purposes.
December 10, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF B.M., M.L., AND A.A.C., CHILDREN

NO. 14-13-00599-CV

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed 

July 9, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the 

record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below 

AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
#### § 50-204.28 Storage of radioactive materials.

Radioactive materials stored in a nonradiation area shall be secured against unauthorized removal from the place of storage.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, AAR AIRLIFT GROUP, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2018-1209

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:16-cv-01704-RHH, Senior Judge Robert 

H. Hodges, Jr.

______________________ 

SUA SPONTE

______________________ 

Before CHEN, MAYER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ December 3, 2018, 

joint response to this court’s order to show cause,

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 
2 DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, LLC v. UNITED STATES

The opinion issued under seal on November 28, 2018, 

is hereby unsealed. 

 FOR THE COURT

December 10, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
17 March 2016

004P14-2

#### State v. Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Order of Dismissal

Dismissed
#### § 102-117.10 What is the scope of this part?

This part addresses shipping freight and household goods worldwide. Freight is property or goods transported as cargo. Household goods are not Government property, but are employees' personal property entrusted to the Government for shipment.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04 -1031 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CONSULAR PROPERTY 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and IRAQ 

Signed at Baghdad October 31, 2004 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
IRAQ 

Consular Property 

 Agreement signed at Baghdad October 31, 2004; 

 Entered into force October 31, 2004.
#### §§ 105-8.161-105-8.169 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         952011
<SECURITIES>                                   284799
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22369
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1191519
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1909684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24689
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       12610
<OTHER-SE>                                     884843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1909684
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               88119
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  70762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                34119
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7593
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   26526
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20836 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEE HOFFMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR H 96-39-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lee Hoffman appeals her guilty-plea conviction for aiding

and abetting and mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and

1341, on the grounds that there was an inadequate factual basis

for her plea. The guilty plea Hoffman entered into with the

Government contained a waiver-of-appeal provision whereby Hoffman

waived her right to appeal her conviction or sentence except as
No. 96-20836

- 2 -

to any upward departure. We have reviewed the briefs and the

record and conclude that the waiver was informed and voluntary

and is therefore binding on Hoffman. Her appeal is without

arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d

215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it

is dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 63 FR 54077, Oct. 8, 1998.

#### § 1.1811 Notice.

The Commission shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons information regarding the regulations set forth in this part, and their applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the Commission. The Commission shall make such information available to such persons in such manner as the Section 504 Officer finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504.
#### § 302-2.1 When may I begin my relocation?

You may begin your relocation only after your agency has approved your travel authorization (TA) in writing (paper or electronic).

[86 FR 73680, Dec. 28, 2021]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JAVIER ABREU-PEREZ, DOC #526775, )

)

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4088

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 21, 2018. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
#### § 302-3.310 Where will I be authorized to separate?

You will be authorized to separate at the place where you have chosen to reside within the United States.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION


REQUIRED
BY RULE 13a-14(b) or


RULE
15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(AS
ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I,
Richard W. Lucas, as Chief Financial Officer of KSW, Inc. (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:




(1) the accompanying Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations  of the Company.





Dated:  March
23, 2009




/s/ Richard W. LucasRichard
      W. LucasChief
      Financial Officer
No. 11-8968.

#### Kirsch *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 102-75.1110 What is the policy governing delegations of authority to the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Education for property used in the administration of any Native American-related functions?

GSA delegates authority to the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Education to transfer and to retransfer to each other, upon request, any of the property of each agency that is being used and will continue to be used in the administration of any functions relating to the Native Americans. The term property, as used in this delegation, includes real property and such personal property as the Secretary making the transfer or re-transfer determines to be related personal property. The Departments must exercise the authority conferred in this section following applicable GSA regulations issued pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 5 of Subtitle I of Title 40 of the United States Code.
§ 50-203.7 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) At any time prior to the hearing the administrative law judge may, on motion of the parties or on his own motion, whenever it appears that the public interest will be served thereby, direct the parties to appear before him for a conference at a designated time and place to consider, among other things: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amending the pleadings for purposes of clarification, amplification or limitation;
( 3 ) Obtaining stipulations of fact or admissions of undisputed facts or the authenticity of documents;
( 4 ) The procedure at the hearing;
( 5 ) Limiting the number of witnesses;
( 6 ) The propriety of mutual exchange among parties of prepared testimony or exhibits; or
( 7 ) Any other matters which would tend to expedite the disposition of the proceeding.
( b ) The action taken at the conference may be recorded, in summary form or otherwise, for use at the hearing. Such record, when agreed to by the parties and approved by the administrative law judge, shall be conclusive as to the action embodied therein. Stipulations and admissions of fact and amendments to pleadings shall be made a part of the record of the proceeding.
[11 FR 14493, Dec. 18, 1946. Redesignated at 24 FR 10952, Dec. 30, 1959, as amended at 61 FR 19987, May 3, 1996]
No. 10-11237.

#### Gipson v. Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 15, 2016

No. 04-16-00354-CR

Tiffany Nicole Cantu,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR9814

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted in part. We 

Order the brief due September 26, 2016. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of September, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 105-72.400 Purpose of property standards.

Sections 105-72.401 through 105-72.407 set forth uniform standards governing management and disposition of property furnished by the Federal Government whose cost was charged to a project supported by a Federal award. Federal awarding agencies shall require recipients to observe these standards under awards and shall not impose additional requirements, unless specifically required by Federal statute. The recipient may use its own property management standards and procedures provided it observes the provisions of § 105-72.401 through § 105-72.407.
S90O0024.

#### HACKNEY v. WHARTON et al.

(386 SE2d 660)

Decided October 19, 1989.

Clarence L. Hackney, *pro se.*

*Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General,*for appellees.

Gregory, Justice.

The petition for original jurisdiction mandamus is hereby dismissed. *Brown v. Johnson,*251 Ga. 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983).

The application for a certificate of probable cause to appeal is also dismissed for lack of a final order in the habeas proceedings below. This dismissal is without prejudice and with leave to file an appeal after final orders have been entered.

*Petition dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Hardware Corporation (the "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), the undersigned President and  Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,  as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects,        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for        the periods covered in the Report.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 857 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 857

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow employers a 200 
 percent deduction for amounts paid or incurred for training employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 1999

 Mr. Campbell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow employers a 200 
 percent deduction for amounts paid or incurred for training employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENHANCED DEDUCTION FOR EMPLOYEE TRAINING COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to trade or business expenses) is amended by redesignating 
subsection (p) as subsection (q) and inserting after subsection (o) the 
following new subsection:
    ``(p) Employee Training Costs.--In the case of an employer, the 
amount of the deduction allowed under this section for training an 
employee shall be 200 percent of the amount allowable under this 
section (determined without regard to this subsection) for such 
training.''.
    (b) Revenue Offset.--
            (1) Modification of rates of corporate tax.--The Secretary 
        of the Treasury shall prescribe rates of tax under section 11 
        of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to tax imposed 
        on corporations) which result in a net increase in revenues for 
        a taxable year equal to the net decrease in revenues for that 
        year as a result of the amendment made by subsection (a).
            (2) Estimates and subsequent adjustments.--The rates of tax 
        prescribed under paragraph (1) shall be determined on the basis 
        of estimates made by the Secretary of the Treasury. Adjustments 
        shall be made in such rates for succeeding taxable years to the 
        extent prior estimates resulted in revenues which were in 
        excess of or less than the revenues required under paragraph 
        (1).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
Manuel



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 14, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00785

- CV

Mary Ann CASTRO

, Appellant

v.

Manuel CASTRO

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 15957

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The court has reviewed the motions filed by appellant on May 12, 2015, which she styled as follows: “Notice of Motion for Spousal Maintenance,” “Motion for Void on the Agreement for Final Divorce Signed on Oct 30, 2013 by Judge Canales,” and “Motion for Counsel Joseph Appelt Malpractice Insurance.” We ORDER that the motions be DENIED

.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s et my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
February 26, 2013 

Esta Rosenberg, Chief 

U.S. Air Carrier Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

 Re: OST-2013-0034 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

 JetBlue has completed its polling of carriers served with JetBlue’s application for a 

Statement of Authorization that would permit JetBlue to display Aer Lingus’ designator code on 

JetBlue’s flights between points in the United States. We have received a “no objection” from all 

carriers. 

Sincerely yours, 

 Jonathan B. Hill 

 Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation 

cc: Service List
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 28218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11375]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS13-11]

Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: OCC--400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024.
    Date: May 21, 2013 (rescheduled from May 8th).
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

Summary Agenda

April 10, 2013 minutes--Open Session
    (No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda

Revised ASC Policy Statements
Appraisal Foundation January 2013 Grant Reimbursement Request
Vermont Compliance Review

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    Email your name, organization and contact information to 
meetings@asc.gov.
    You may also send a written request via U.S. Mail, fax or 
commercial carrier to the Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H Street 
NW., Ste 760, Washington, DC 20005. The fax number is 202-289-4101. 
Your request must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the 
Monday prior to the meeting. Attendees must have a valid government-
issued photo ID and must agree to submit to reasonable security 
measures. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public 
attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the 
ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any 
video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any 
other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is 
prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: May 9, 2013.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-11375 Filed 5-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```