alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 102-2.45 How is the FMR numbered? ( a ) All FMR sections are designated by three numbers. The following example illustrates the chapter (it's always 102), part, and section designations:
( b ) In the looseleaf version, the month, year, and number of FMR amendments appear at the bottom of each page.
No. 10-11231.

#### Lorinda J. H. *v.*Winnebago County Department of Health and Human Services.

Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

David J. Smith

Clerk of Court 

July 13, 2023

For rules and forms visit

www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Clerk - Southern District of Florida 

U.S. District Court 

400 N MIAMI AVE

MIAMI, FL 33128-1810 

Appeal Number: 23-11854-D 

Case Style: GRACE, Inc., et al v. City of Miami 

District Court Docket No: 1:22-cv-24066-KMM

The enclosed copy of the Clerk's Order of Dismissal pursuant to appellant's motion to dismiss is 

issued as the mandate of this court. See 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a). 

Any pending motions are now rendered moot in light of the attached order. 

Clerk's Office Phone Numbers 

General Information: 404-335-6100 Attorney Admissions: 404-335-6122 

Case Administration: 404-335-6135 Capital Cases: 404-335-6200 

CM/ECF Help Desk: 404-335-6125 Cases Set for Oral Argument: 404-335-6141 

Enclosure(s) 

DIS-3 Letter and Entry of Dismissal Vol

 

USCA11 Case: 23-11854 Document: 15 Date Filed: 07/13/2023 Page: 1 of 2 

JE Jul 13, 2023 MIAMI

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 88 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2023 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 23-11854-D

______________ 

GRACE, INC., 

ENGAGE MIAMI, INC., 

SOUTH DADE BRANCH OF THE NAACP, 

MIAMI-DADE BRANCH OF THE NAACP, 

CLARICE COOPER, et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

versus

CITY OF MIAMI, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

__________________________________________

ORDER: Motion For Leave to File Documents Out of Time filed by Appellant City of Miami is 

GRANTED by clerk [9978441-2].; ORDER: Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by 

Appellant City of Miami is GRANTED by clerk [9979696-2]. Pursuant to FRAP 42 and 11th 

Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above referenced appeal was duly entered dismissed on this date.

Effective July 13, 2023. 

DAVID J. SMITH

Clerk of Court of the United States Court

of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION 

USCA11 Case: 23-11854 Document: 15 Date Filed: 07/13/2023 Page: 2 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 88 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



I, Patrick Evans, Chief Executive Officer of Mountain Province
Diamonds Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Annual Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:    | /s/ Patrick Evans      
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Patrick Evans          
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  | February 14, 2014      



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F/A. A signed original of this statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 32.0

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Andrea Electronics Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ DOULGAS J. ANDREA                                                            
|                   |  |  |  | Douglas J. Andrea                                                                
|                   |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Secretary
|                   |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | /s/ CORISA L. GUIFFRE                                                            
|                   |  |  |  | Corisa L. Guiffre                                                                
|                   |  |  |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary
#### § 102-85.30 Are there special rules for certain Federal customers?

Yes, in lieu of OAs, GSA is able to enter into agreements with customer agencies that reflect the parties particular needs. For example, the space and services provided to the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate are governed by existing memoranda of agreement (MOA). When there are conflicts between the provisions of this part and MOAs, the MOAs prevail.
No. D-2620.

#### In re Disbarment of Elliott.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 565 U. S. 1107.]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 122 (Friday, June 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Children's Hospitals Graduate Medical Education (CHGME) Program 
Conference

    On June 19, 2000, the Health Resources and Services Administration 
(HRSA) published a notice in the Federal Register announcing the 
Children's Hospitals Graduate Medical Education (CHGME) Program (65 FR 
37985). Interested parties are invited to attend a briefing conference 
on July 7, 2000, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. EDT in conference room D in the 
Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857. 
Parties may also participate in the conference by telephone. To do so, 
dial: 800-545-4387 or 700-991-1738 (for Federal Government employees), 
then enter the access code ID# 28353. Telephone participants should 
call by 12:45 p.m.
    The conference is to provide information on the topics contained in 
the CHGME notice: proposed eligibility criteria, funding factors and 
methodology, and performance measures. It will include a question and 
answer period.
    For additional information call or write to: F. Lawrence Clare, 
telephone: (301) 443-7334; Division of Medicine and Dentistry, Bureau 
of Health Professions, Room 9-A-27, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers 
Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d616e616c7f684d657f7e6c236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d313e313c2f381d352f2e3c733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 19, 2000.
Claude Earl Fox,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-15901 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Natural Resources Conservation Service 

# SUMMARY:

It is the intention of the NRCS in South Dakota to issue revised conservation practice standards in Section IV of the FOTG for the practice “Animal Trails and Walkways.” 

# DATES:

                        Comments on this notice must be received within 30 days from the publication date in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

      ( print page 40078)    

# ADDRESSES:

All comments concerning the proposed conservation practice standard changes should be addressed to: Dean Fisher, State Conservationist, NRCS, 200 Fourth Street SW, Huron, South Dakota 57350. A copy of this standard will be made available upon written request. 

Dated: June 13, 2000. 

Dean Fisher, 

State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Huron, South Dakota 57350. 

[FR Doc. 00-16408 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-16-U
#### § 300-70.4 Must we report travel, transportation, and relocation data if we have major suborganizations?

Your report must cover all components of your agency.

[FTR Amdt. 2017-01, 83 FR 604, Jan. 5, 2018]
No. 11-8.

#### MIG, Inc., fka Metromedia International Group, Inc. *v.*Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, L. L. P.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">New Way Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of ISABEL TUAPANTA, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>American Transit Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Barry A. Schwartz, J.), entered August 13, 2013. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is modified by providing that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it had timely and properly denied the claim based on plaintiff's assignor's failure to appear for examinations under oath (EUOs). The Civil Court denied plaintiff's motion and granted defendant's cross motion.</p><p>Although defendant established that the EUO scheduling letters had been timely mailed (<a href="../2008/2008_04072.htm" target="_blank"><i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123</a> [2008]), defendant failed to submit proof by someone with personal knowledge of the nonappearance of plaintiff's assignor for the EUOs in question (<a href="../2006/2006_09604.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720</a> [2006]). As a result, defendant failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment.</p><p>Plaintiff's moving papers failed to establish either that defendant had failed to deny the claim within the requisite 30-day period (<a href="../2015/2015_04787.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Viviane Etienne Med. Care, P.C. v Country-Wide Ins. Co.</i>, 25 NY3d 498</a> [2015]), or that defendant had issued a timely denial of claim that was conclusory, vague or without merit as a matter of law (<a href="../2010/2010_08933.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Westchester Med. Ctr. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.</i>, 78 AD3d 1168</a> [2010]; <a href="../2011/2011_51292.htm" target="_blank"><i>Ave T MPC Corp. v Auto One Ins. Co.</i>, 32 Misc 3d 128</a>[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 51292[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2011]). Thus, plaintiff did not establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is modified by providing that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: June 06, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### The City of McPherson v. E. J. Manning.

Rulings, *When Reviewed*— New *Trial.*Rulings of the district court, made in the course of a trial, are not available as grounds of error in the supreme court, unless the district court has had an opportunity to reexamine and correct them upon a motion for a new trial, and unless the overruling of that motion is assigned as error in the supreme court.

*Frrror from MaFherson District Court.*

Action to recover damages for bodily injuries. Judgment for plaintiff *Manning*for $1,000, at the April term, 1887. The defendant *City*brings the case here.

*130
      *D. G. Welch, M. P. Simpson,*and *W. J. Travis,*for plaintiff in error.

*Inicien Earle,*and *Thos. G. Sawyer,*for defendant in error.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

E. J. Manning was walking along the sidewalk of a street in McPherson, after dark, on January 26, 1886, when he fell and was severely injured. He brought this action against the city to recover $10,000, alleging that the injury was caused by the negligence of the city in allowing ice and snow to accumulate on the sidewalk, rendering it unfit and dangerous to travel over, and upon a trial he recovered a judgment for $1,000. The city asks a reversal, insisting that the findings and verdict of the jury are not sustained by sufficient evidence, and that the court erred in its charge to the jury. A motion for a new trial, based on similar grounds, was filed and overruled; but this ruling of the district court is not assigned as error in this court. The assignments of the petition in error are—

> “ 1. The court erred in the instructions given to the jury in this action.

> *“2.*The court erred in refusing to give the instructions which the city of McPherson prayed the court to give.

> *“3.*The court erred in admitting the evidence of witnesses of defendant to which the city of McPherson objected.

> “4. The court erred in ruling out the evidence offered by the plaintiff in the trial of said action.

> *“5.*There was not sufficient evidence to support the verdict of the jury against the city of McPherson.

> *“6. The*verdict was illegally arrived at by the jury.

> *“*7. For errors of law occurring at the trial of said cause, excepted to by plaintiff.”

Thus it will be seen, that error is not predicated on the overruling of a motion for a new *trial;*and the silence of the city in this respect must be regarded as an acquiescence in the ruling. All matters now complained of occurred during the trial of the action, and were subject to review upon the motion for a new trial. Such rulings can only be brought to this *131court after the district court has had an opportunity to reexamine and correct them upon a motion for a new trial; and unless the overruling of that motion is assigned for error, they cannot be considered here. *(Carson v. Funk,*27 Kas. 524; *Clark v. Schnur,*40 id. 72; *Landauer v. Hoagland,*41 id. 520; same case, 21 Pac. Rep. 645.)

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.
#### § 102-37.45 How long is property available for donation screening?

Entities authorized to participate in the donation program may screen property, concurrently with Federal agencies, as soon as the property is reported as excess up until the surplus release date. The screening period is normally 21 calendar days, except as noted in § 102-36.95 of this chapter.
# Official Journal C 131A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.131.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 131A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 568 May 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.131.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 131A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 568 May 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2013/C 131A/01 | Notice of open competitions | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2013/C 131A/01

Notice of open competitions

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Adam M. Moskowitz

Joseph M. Kaye

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

Service@moskowitz-law.com

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice)

Stephen Neal Zack

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800, Miami, FL 33131

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 58-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 58-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 2 of 2