Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 249 / Tuesday, December 29, 2015 / Notices 81317 

preferred method), by email to 

docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via 

email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Address comments to OMB Desk Officer 

for EPA. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes profanity, threats, 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick Yellin, Monitoring, Assistance, 

and Media Programs Division, Office of 

Compliance, Mail Code 2227A, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 

564–2970; fax number: (202) 564–0050; 

email address: yellin.patrick@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Supporting documents which explain in 

detail the information that the EPA will 

be collecting are available in the public 

docket for this ICR. The docket can be 

viewed online at www.regulations.gov 

or in person at the EPA Docket Center, 

EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC. The telephone number for the 

Docket Center is 202–566–1744. For 

additional information about EPA’s 

public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/ 

dockets. 

Abstract: Owners and operators of 

wood building products surface coating 

facilities are required to comply with 

reporting and record keeping 

requirements for the general provisions 

of 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, as well as 

the specific requirements at 40 CFR part 

63, subpart QQQQ. This includes 

submitting initial notifications, 

performance tests and periodic reports 

and results, and maintaining records of 

the occurrence and duration of any 

startup, shutdown, or malfunction in 

the operation of an affected facility, or 

any period during which the monitoring 

system is inoperative. These reports are 

used by EPA to determine compliance 

with the standards. 

Form Numbers: None. 

Respondents/affected entities: Wood 

building products surface coating 

facilities. 

Respondent’s obligation to respond: 

Mandatory (40 CFR part 63, subpart 

QQQQ). 

Estimated number of respondents: 

232 (total). 

Frequency of response: Initially, 

occasionally, and semiannually. 

Total estimated burden: 75,800 hours 

(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 

1320.3(b). 

Total estimated cost: $7,880,000 (per 

year), includes $278,000 annualized 

capital or operation & maintenance 

costs. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is a 

small adjustment increase in the 

respondent and Agency labor hours in 

this ICR compared to the previous ICR. 

There is also a decrease in the total 

O&M costs. This is not due to program 

changes; rather, the changes occurred 

because we are rounding total values in 

this ICR to three significant figures. 

Courtney Kerwin, 

Acting Director, Collection Strategies 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2015–32729 Filed 12–28–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0774, FRL–9940–25] 

Alpha-Chlorohydrin, Registration 

Review Proposed Interim Decision; 

Notice of Availability 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

availability of EPA’s proposed interim 

registration review decision for alphachlorohydrin and opens a public 

comment period on this proposed 

interim decision. Registration review is 

EPA’s periodic review of pesticide 

registrations to ensure that each 

pesticide continues to satisfy the 

statutory standard for registration, that 

is, that the pesticide can perform its 

intended function without unreasonable 

adverse effects on human health or the 

environment. Through this program, 

EPA is ensuring that each pesticide’s 

registration is based on current 

scientific and other knowledge, 

including its effects on human health 

and the environment. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 29, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by the docket identification 

(ID) number for the specific pesticide of 

interest provided in the Table by one of 

the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on commenting 

or visiting the docket, along with more 

information about dockets generally, is 

available at http://www.epa.gov/

dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

pesticide specific information, contact: 

The Chemical Review Manager for the 

pesticide of interest identified in the 

Table. 

For general information on the 

registration review program, contact: 

Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 308–8015; email address: 

dumas.richard@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, farm 

worker, and agricultural advocates; the 

chemical industry; pesticide users; and 

members of the public interested in the 

sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. 

Since others also may be interested, the 

Agency has not attempted to describe all 

the specific entities that may be affected 

by this action. If you have any questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

to a particular entity, consult the 

Chemical Review Manager for the 

pesticide of interest identified in the 

Table. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
81318 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 249 / Tuesday, December 29, 2015 / Notices 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When preparing and submitting your 

comments, see the commenting tips at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets/

comments.html. 

II. What action is the agency taking? 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice 

announces the availability of EPA’s 

proposed interim registration review 

decision for the pesticide shown in the 

following table, and opens a 60-day 

public comment period on this 

proposed interim decision. 

TABLE—REGISTRATION REVIEW PROPOSED INTERIM DECISIONS

Registration review case name and No. Pesticide docket ID No. Chemical review manager, telephone number, 

email address 

Alpha-chlorohydrin (Case 4120) ........................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0726 ............................. Matthew Manupella, manupella.matthew@

epa.gov, (703) 347–0411. 

Alpha-chlorohydrin (Proposed 

Interim Decision). The registration 

review docket for alpha-chlorohydrin 

(EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0726) is opening 

in December 2015. The only registered 

use for alpha-chlorohydrin is as a 

tamper-proof bait station/bait 

application delivery system for 

elimination of Norway rats. Alphachlorohydrin is approved for use in and 

around the indoors of commercial/

industrial facilities and sanitary sewers. 

The label states not to use the product 

in any facility where children may be 

present, and there are no outdoor uses 

permitted. EPA is also publishing a draft 

human health risk assessment and a 

draft ecological problem formulation at 

the time of the docket opening for a 60- 

day public comment period. In this 

alpha-chlorohydrin proposed interim 

decision, the Agency has determined 

that no additional data are required and 

no changes to the affected registration or 

its labeling are currently required. At 

this time, EPA is making no human 

health or environmental safety findings 

associated with the Endocrine Disruptor 

Screening Program (EDSP) screening of 

alpha-chlorohydrin, nor is it making an 

endangered species finding. EPA’s 

registration review decision for alphachlorohydrin will depend upon the 

result of an EDSP Federal Food, Drug 

and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) section 

408(p) determination, and Endangered 

Species Assessment (ESA) 

determination. 

The registration review docket for a 

pesticide generally includes earlier 

documents related to the registration 

review of the case. In the case of alphachlorohydrin the Agency expedited the 

registration review and is opening the 

docket with the proposed interim 

decision and supporting documents. 

The registration review program is 

being conducted under congressionally 

mandated time frames, and EPA 

recognizes the need both to make timely 

decision and to involve the public. 

Section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, 

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) 

(7 U.S.C. 136a(g)) required EPA to 

establish by regulation procedures for 

reviewing pesticide registrations, 

originally with a goal of reviewing each 

pesticide’s registration every 15 years to 

ensure that a pesticide continues to 

meet the FIFRA standard for 

registration. The Agency’s final rule to 

implement this program was issued in 

August 2006 and became effective in 

October 2006, and appears at 40 CFR 

part 155, subpart C. The Pesticide 

Registration Improvement Act of 2003 

(PRIA) was amended and extended in 

September 2007. FIFRA, as amended by 

PRIA in 2007, requires EPA to complete 

registration review decisions by October 

1, 2022, for all pesticides registered as 

of October 1, 2007. 

The registration review final rule at 40 

CFR 155.58(a) provides for a minimum 

60-day public comment period on all 

proposed interim registration review 

decisions. This comment period is 

intended to provide an opportunity for 

public input and a mechanism for 

initiating any necessary amendments to 

the proposed interim decisions. All 

comments should be submitted using 

the methods in ADDRESSES, and must be 

received by EPA on or before the closing 

date. These comments will become part 

of the docket for the pesticide included 

in the Table. Comments received after 

the close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

The Agency will carefully consider all 

comments received by the closing date 

and will provide a ‘‘Response to 

Comments Memorandum’’ in the 

docket. The interim registration review 

decision will explain the effect that any 

comments had on the interim decision 

and provide the Agency’s response to 

significant comments. 

Background on the registration review 

program is provided at: http://

www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: December 16, 2015. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2015–32751 Filed 12–28–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OECA–2012–0528; FRL–9940– 

67–OEI] 

Information Collection Request 

Submitted to OMB for Review and 

Approval; Comment Request; NSPS 

for Synthetic Fiber Production 

Facilities (Renewal) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency has submitted an information 

collection request (ICR), ‘‘NSPS for 

Synthetic Fiber Production Facilities (40 

CFR part 60, subpart HHH) (Renewal)’’ 

(EPA ICR No. 1156.13, OMB Control No. 

2060–0059) to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for review and 

approval in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.). This is a proposed 

extension of the ICR, which is currently 

approved through December 31, 2015. 

Public comments were previously 

requested via the Federal Register (80 

FR 32116) on June 5, 2015 during a 60- 

day comment period. This notice allows 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comments. A fuller description of the 

ICR is given below, including its 

estimated burden and cost to the public. 

An Agency may not conduct or sponsor 

and a person is not required to respond 

to a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES