alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 122 (Friday, June 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15972]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR LITERACY

[CFDA No. 84.257T]


NIFL Regional Technology Centers Project; Notice Inviting 
Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year 2000

AGENCY: The National Institute for Literacy (NIFL).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute for Literacy published an announcement 
in the Federal Register of June 9, 2000, Notice of Awards being 
offered. The document contained an incorrect deadline submission date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaleh Behroozi Soroui; LINCS Director; 
National Institute for Literacy; 1775 I Street, NW., Suite 730; 
Washington, DC 20006; Telephone: 202-233-2039; FAX: 202-233-2050; E-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ef4fcfbf6ecf1f1e4f7def0f7f8f2b0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6ccc4c3ced4c9c9dccfe6c8cfc0ca88c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>

Correction

    In the Federal Register of June 9, 2000, in FR Doc. 00-14548, on 
page 36733, in the third column, correct the submission ``date'' 
caption to read:

    7. Take advantage of the strengths and unique capabilities of each 
region, the regional training centers will work with each other and the 
NIFL to coordinate their activities, and whenever possible carryout 
joint activities, in order to maximize the total mount of resources 
available to LINCS and allow them to have the greatest impact possible.

    Deadline for Applications: July 17, 2000.

    Dated: July 20, 2000.
Sharyn Abbott,
Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15972 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6055-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2007 (the Report), I, Gregory Norden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 7, 2007





By:

/s/    Gregory NordenGregory Norden Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
ex4-1.htm


Exhibit 4.1

CERTIFICATE OF INCREASE

OF

SERIES J CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

OF

LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION

 




 

Pursuant to Section 151(g) of the

General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

 




 

Lighting Science Group Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”) DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

 

That pursuant to the authority expressly granted and vested in the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board”) by the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (as amended from time to time, the “Certificate of Incorporation”), the Board has adopted the following resolutions increasing the number of authorized shares of Series J Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series J Preferred Stock”) of the Corporation:

 

RESOLVED, that pursuant to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series J Convertible Preferred Stock of the Corporation (as amended from time to time, the “Series J Certificate of Designation”), the Corporation was authorized to issue 95,100 shares of Series J Preferred Stock as a series of the Corporation’s authorized Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share; and, be it

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to the authority expressly granted and vested in the Board in accordance with the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation and the consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series J Preferred Stock, as required by the Series J Certificate of Designation, the number of shares of Preferred Stock of the Corporation designated as Series J Preferred Stock be, and hereby is, increased from 95,100 shares to 120,000 shares; and, be it 

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that each of the Chief Executive Officer and the Secretary of the Corporation be and hereby are authorized and directed in the name and on behalf of the Corporation to execute and file a Certificate (the “Certificate of Increase”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware increasing the number of shares constituting the Series J Preferred Stock from 95,100 shares to 120,000 shares and to take any and all other actions deemed necessary or appropriate to effectuate these resolutions; and, be it

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that any officer of the Corporation be, and each hereby is, authorized and directed for and in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation to prepare, file and deliver any and all notices or other filings that may be required by applicable law, the Series J Certificate of Designation or the Certificate of Increase.

 


 

 




 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Increase to be duly executed on its behalf by its undersigned Chief Executive Officer as of January 27, 2017.

 

 

 

	
 
	
By: 
	
/s/ Ed Bednarcik
	
 

	
 
	
Name:
	
Ed Bednarcik
	
 

	
 
	
Title: 
	
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 101-5.100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart states general policies, guidelines, and procedures for establishing centralized services in multioccupant Federal buildings.

[42 FR 35853, July 12, 1977]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 6, 2021

No. 04-20-00356-CR

John Stewart MUELLER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-19-0000009

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

On August 4, 2021, the court ordered this appeal abated and remanded for appointment of 

new counsel for appellant John Stewart Mueller. On August 5, 2021, the trial court appointed 

Patrick Maguire as appellant’s attorney. We therefore ORDER appellant to file his brief by 

November 5, 2021. The State’s brief will be due 30 days after appellant files his brief.

It is so ORDERED October 6, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
§ 102-192.140 What types of support does GSA offer to Federal agency mail management programs? ( a ) GSA supports Federal agency mail management programs by— ( 1 ) Assisting in the development of agency policy and guidance in mail management and mail operations;
( 2 ) Identifying best business practices and sharing them with Federal agencies;
( 3 ) Developing and providing access to a Government-wide management information system for mail;
( 4 ) Helping agencies develop performance measures and management information systems for mail;
( 5 ) Maintaining a current list of agency mail managers;
( 6 ) Establishing, developing, and maintaining interagency mail committees;
( 7 ) Maintaining liaison with the USPS and other service providers at the national level;
( 8 ) Maintaining a publically accessible Web site for mail communications policy; and
( 9 ) Serving as a point of contact for all Federal agencies on mail issues.
( b ) For further information contact: U.S. General Services Administration, Office of Government-wide Policy (MA), 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20504; telephone 202-501-1777, or email: *Federal.mail@gsa.gov .*
No. 10-11160.

#### Mixon *v.*Corrigan et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.1 A

                FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE JULY 29, 1998 AMENDED AND
                   RESTATED UNIT OPTION PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF
                      TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE JULY 28, 1998 AMENDED AND RESTATED UNIT
OPTION PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP is adopted by
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.

         The July 28, 1998 Amended and Restated Unit Option Plan for Employees
of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership is hereby amended in the following
manner:

         1. The text of Section 2.1 is amended and restated as follows:

                  "Section 2.1.  Units Subject to Plan.
                                 ---------------------

                           The aggregate number of Units of Partnership
                  Interests which may be issued upon exercise of Options shall
                  not exceed 2,250,000; provided that such aggregate number
                  shall be reduced by one for each Common Share that is issued
                  pursuant to the exercise of Options under the Amended and
                  Restated Share Option Plan for Directors and Executive and Key
                  Employees of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc."

         2. In all other respects, the July 28, 1998 Amended and Restated Unit
Option Plan for Employees of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership shall
continue in full force and effect.

         I hereby certify that the foregoing First Amendment to the July 29,
1998 Amended and Restated Unit Option Plan for Employees of Tanger Properties
Limited Partnership was adopted by Tanger Properties Limited Partnership on
February 24, 2003.


                             /s/ Rochelle G. Simpson
                         Rochelle G. Simpson, Secretary

         I hereby certify that the foregoing First Amendment to the July 29,
1998 Amended and Restated Partnership Unit Option Plan for Employees of Tanger
Properties Limited Partnership was duly adopted by the Shareholders of Tanger
Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. on May 9, 2003.

                             /s/ Rochelle G. Simpson
                         Rochelle G. Simpson, Secretary
§ 109-26.501-53 Acquisitions by transfer. ( a ) The acquisition of passenger motor vehicles by transfer from another Government agency or DOE organization shall be within the allocations prescribed in § 109-26.501-50 of this subpart.
( b ) Passenger motor vehicles may be acquired by transfer provided they are: ( 1 ) Considered as an addition to the motor vehicle fleet of the receiving office;
( 2 ) Acquired for replacement purposes and an equal number of replaced motor vehicles are reported for disposal within 30 days;
( 3 ) For temporary emergency needs exceeding three months and approved in writing by the DPMO; or
( 4 ) For temporary emergency needs of three months or less in lieu of commercial rentals. These transfers will not count toward the allocation.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory P. Chandler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





















/s/ Gregory P. ChandlerChief Financial OfficerApril 14, 2011
September 4, 2015

Mr. Jacob Thomas

681 Johnson Road

Oliver Springs, TN 37840

Dear Mr. Thomas:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 45.23(b), 91.103(b)(2) , 91.105, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.405, 91.407, 91.409, 

91.417, and part 21, Subpart H, and part 61 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the 

next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your May 22, 2015 and July 17, 2015 exemption request filed in Docket 

No. FAA−2015−2300, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition 

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0470 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-008-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Model 214B, 214B-1, and 214ST Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 26 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent loss of tail rotor hanger bearing grease, 

failure of the bearing, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $1,372 replacement per bearing

Labor per Helicopter

(2.5 work-hour x 

$85/work-hour for an

inspection)

(3 work-hour x $85/workhour for replacement)

$213

$255

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $213 for an inspection

$1,627 for a bearing replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $5,538 per inspection cycle

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: James Blyn
§ 105-60.306 Expedited processing. ( a ) A request for expedited processing may be made at any time. In order to qualify for consideration for expedited processing, the request shall reasonably describe the records sought. Expedited requests should be described in sufficient detail to facilitate expedited processing.
( b ) A requester who seeks expedited processing shall submit a statement with their FOIA request, certified to be true and correct, explaining in detail the basis for making the request for expedited processing as described in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this section. As a matter of administrative discretion, GSA may waive the formal certification requirement.
( c ) GSA may process requests and appeals on an expedited basis whenever it is determined that they involve: ( 1 ) Circumstances in which the lack of expedited processing could reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual;
( 2 ) An urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged Federal Government activity, if made by a person who is primarily engaged in disseminating information; or
( 3 ) The loss of substantial due process rights; or
( 4 ) A matter of widespread and exceptional media interest in which there exist possible questions about the Government's integrity that affect public confidence.
( d ) GSA shall notify the requester within 10 calendar days of its receipt of a request for expedited processing and of its decision whether to grant or deny expedited processing. If expedited processing is granted, the request shall be given priority, placed in the processing track for expedited requests, and processed as soon as practicable. If a request for expedited processing is denied, GSA shall act on any appeal of that decision within 3 business days.
# Comments on: 22-1537: ANALOG DEVICES, INC. v. XILINX, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential
No. 11-1098.

#### Lomax *v.*United States Senate Armed Services Committee et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Refuge Improvement Act of 1997, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has published the Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge Complex Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment. The Plan describes how the Service intends to manage the Ottawa Refuge Complex for the next 10-15 years.

# DATES:

Submit written comments by July 28, 2000. All comments should be addressed to Gary Muehlenhardt (RE-AP), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, MN 55111. Comments may also be submitted through the Service's regional Web site at http://midwest.fws.gov/​planning.

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the Plan or a summary may be obtained by writing to Gary Muehlenhardt at the address above or placing a request through the Web site.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For additional information contact Larry Martin, Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge, 14000 W. State Route 2, Oak Harbor, OH 43449, phone (419) 898-0014 or E-mail: larry_d_martin@fws.gov.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Located east of Toledo, Ohio, the Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge Complex is a unique slice of marshland on the southwestern shore of Lake Erie. As a major migration corridor, the area is vital to migratory birds including waterfowl, shorebirds, raptors and songbirds that need rest and food either after crossing Lake Erie on their way south or before they head back north over the winter. As much as 70 percent of the Mississippi flyway's population of black ducks use Lake Erie marshes during migration.

The Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan emphasizes the habitat needs of fish and wildlife as well as opportunities for wildlife-dependent recreation.

Dated: June 20, 2000.

Marvin E. Moriarty,

Acting Regional Director.

[FR Doc. 00-16174 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
#### § 302-11.321 How will I be reimbursed when I share a lease with someone else?

When you share a lease with someone else you will be reimbursed on a pro rata basis for that portion of the lease that you are responsible for.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dean G. Stamos., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, Vie Financial
Group, Inc.s Annual Report, as amended, on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report, as amended, on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vie Financial Group, Inc.



|                    |  |       
|------------------- |  | ------
|Date: July 29, 2003 |  | By:   
|                    |  | Name: 
|                    |  | Title:



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vie Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by Vie Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
#### § 302-3.402 When am I eligible for a TCS?

You are eligible for a TCS when you are directed to perform a TCS at a long-term duty location, and you otherwise would be eligible for payment of temporary duty travel allowances authorized under chapter 301 of this title. For exceptions, see § 302-3.403.
§ 102-75.50 What does the term “Underutilized” mean? Underutilized means an entire property or portion thereof, with or without improvements, which is used— ( a ) Irregularly or intermittently by the accountable Executive agency for current program purposes of that agency; or
( b ) For current program purposes that can be satisfied with only a portion of the property.
No. 10-11242.

#### Daniel *v.*Long Island Housing Partnership, Inc., et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO: 1:22-CV-24015-KMM

MAIRIN GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

BREADFRUIT TREE, INC DBA NFSKIN,

Defendant.

______________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, MAIRIN GONZALEZ (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, BREADFRUIT TREE,

INC DBA NFSKIN, (“Defendant”) (together, the “Parties”), by and through their respective

undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby

stipulate and agree to Dismissal With Prejudice of the above-captioned action, with each party to

bear her/its own attorneys’ fees and costs. The Parties further stipulate and agree that the Court

shall retain jurisdiction for sixty (60) days following the filing of this Stipulation to enforce the

terms of any agreement between the Parties.

Dated: April 27, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Alberto Naranjo

Alberto Naranjo, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 92923

Email: AN@ANLawFirm.com

AN Law Firm, P.A.

7900 Oak Lane #400 AN Law

Miami Lakes, FL 33016

Telephone: (305) 942-8070

Facsimile: (305) 328-3884

Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/Jason D. Berkowitz

Jason D. Berkowitz

Email: jason@btattorneys.com

BT Law Group, PLLC

3050 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 205,

Miami, FL 33137

Telephone: (305) 507-8506

Facsimile: (305) 760-4722

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:22-cv-24015-KMM Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2023 Page 1 of 1
No. 10-11091.

#### Vinton *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.