alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Munawar Hidayatallah, Chief Executive Officer of Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc., certify that:     1. Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A-1 of Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     *Date:July 21 , 2006*By: */s/ Munawar H. Hidayatallah*         *Munawar H. Hidayatallah*    *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman*
1.72265625 Dn Diameter of Nozzle ( Ft. ) 2

13.78125 8* (Dn)2 1.36118889 Dd 2 Diameter of Sampling Duct (Ft) 2 10.12442145 3.977 Roof vent velocity (ft/sec) from Anemometer Data **40.26482412** Desired Velocity in the Duct (ft/sec) 5-1-13 Line 3
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 12, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 12, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0145. TRI Q. DU v. LASHARN HUGHES et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2019CV319725
Exhibit 31.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Sean M. Healey, certify that:





|   |                                                                                          
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







Date: March 28, 2014





/s/ SEAN M. HEALEY


Sean M. Healey


Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Commissioner King’s May 26, 2023 Instagram Post

Christine King (@iamchristineking) and SEOPW CRA (@miamicra), INSTAGRAM (May 26, 

2023) , https://www.instagram.com/p/Cstt71krZJU/ (tagging @miamicra, @naacp, 

@naacp_miami_dade):

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-14 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 2, 2021

t0526 

# Order

Clerk June 2, 2021

161521 & (45)(46)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161521

COA: 347184

Jackson CC: 18

- 004024

- FH

JONATHAN WAYNE McPHERSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2020

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. We

REMAND this case to the Jackson Circuit Court for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to

People v Ginther , 390 Mich 436 (1973), regarding whether the defe ndant’s trial counsel

rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance by: (1) failing to object under MRE

404(b) to the prosecutor’s questions during the cross

- examination of the defendant, see

People v Wilder , 502 Mich 57 (2018); (2) presenting a diminished capacity defense, see

People v Carpenter , 464 Mich 223, 241 (2001); and (3) failing to investigate and pursue

an insanity defense based on the defendant’s post

- traumatic stress disorder. The motion

to remand and mot ion to expand the record are DENIED.

We further ORDER the Jackson Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative

Order 2003

- 03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint

counsel to represent the defendant.

We do not re tain jurisdiction.
#### § 302-7.305 When must my agency ship my UAB?

Your agency must ship your UAB in time to ensure that your shipment arrives by the time you (and/or your family) report to your new official station. Arrangements should begin prior to your and/or your family's departure to your new official station.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4192 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4192

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 20 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 3000 
  Veterans Drive in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ``Arturo R. 
                     Watlington, Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 3000 Veterans 
Drive in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Arturo R. Watlington, Sr. Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Arturo R. Watlington, Sr. Post 
Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 11-9203.

#### Freeman *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: 22-1961: In Re GO & ASSOCIATES, LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential
§ 302-8.200 Am I eligible for extended storage during assignment OCONUS? Yes, you are eligible for extended storage during assignment OCONUS if your agency authorizes it, and if: ( a ) The official station is one to which you are not authorized to take, or at which you are unable to use, your HHG; or
( b ) Your agency authorizes it as being in the public interest; or
( c ) Your agency determines the estimated cost of storage would be less than the cost of round-trip transportation (including temporary storage) of the HHG to your new official station.
#### § 102-75.230 Who is responsible for property protection and maintenance costs while the request for exception is being reviewed?

The agency requesting the property will assume responsibility for protection and maintenance costs not more than 40 days from the date of the Administrator's letter to OMB requesting concurrence for an exception to the 100 percent reimbursement requirement. If the request is denied, the requesting agency may pay the fair market value for the property or withdraw its request. If the request is withdrawn, responsibility for protection and maintenance cost will return to the landholding agency at that time.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6610

ISIAH JAMES, II,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director; JAMES BEAM, Warden;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-627-0-13BD)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isiah James, II, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Robert F. Daley, Jr., Assistant Attorney

General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to vacate the court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. James v. Moore, No. CA-97-627-0-13BD

(D.S.C. Mar. 31, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
009P16

#### State v. Jordan Leon Mustard

Def’s *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-147)

Denied
28 January 2016

026P16

#### Shaka Greene v. Trustee Services of Carolina, LLC and US Bank, N.A. In tire Matter of the Foreclosure of Real Property under Deed of Trust from Jeffrey S. Kenley and Laura L. Kenley, in the Original Amount of $296,700, and Dated September 29, 2006 and Recorded on September 30,2006, in Book 3936 at Page 427, of Union County Registry

1. Pit’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-90 & COA15-97)

1. Allowed 01/22/2016

2. Pit’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*
#### § 109-38.301-1 Contractors' use.

Program Secretarial Officer (PSO) shall ensure that provisions of the FPMR/FMR concerning contractor use of Government motor vehicles are complied with by their designated contractors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,597
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,597
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,585
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       285,165
<OTHER-SE>                                    (299,153)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,597
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,357)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 109-1.5114 Use of non-Government-owned property.

Non-Government-owned personal property shall not be installed in, affixed to, or otherwise made a part of any Government-owned personal property when such action will adversely affect the operation or condition of the Government property.
#### Harold SMITH, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold Smith, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 03-7147, 03-7608.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 12, 2004.

Decided: June 3, 2004.

*487Harold Smith, Jr., Appellant pro se.

William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

No. 03-7147, dismissed; No. 03-7608, affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Harold Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a certificate of appealability (No. 03-7147) and his motion for a copy of records at the government’s expense (No. 03-7608). As to No. OS-7147, a certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, in No. 03-7147, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. As to No. 03-7608, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, in No. 03-7608, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Smith v. United States,*No. CA-02-2456 (D.S.C. Sept. 3, 2003). While we grant Smith leave to proceed in forma pauperis in No. 03-7608, we deny his motions for appointment of counsel and for abeyance in No. 03-7147. We also deny his motion to stay these appeals, his motion for injunctive relief, and his motion to consolidate these appeals with two other cases. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 03-7147, *DISMISSED*

No. *03-7608, AFFIRMED*
#### § 223.1 Headquarters and areas.

Headquarters provides policy guidance, procedures, and interpretation to area officials.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 80

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the exclusion from

gross income for veterans’ benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

the exclusion from gross income for veterans’ benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF VETERANS’

4 BENEFITS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 134 of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain

7 military benefits) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—Gross income shall not

9 include—

10 ‘‘(1) any qualified military benefit, and
2

•HR 80 IH

1 ‘‘(2) any other benefit administered by the Sec2 retary of Veterans Affairs.’’

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

5 December 31, 1984.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.2 

I, Stephen C. Donnelly, certify that: 

1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emtec, Inc.; 

2.           Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.           The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave: 

              a)           designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

              b)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented    in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

              c)           disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter ( the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.           The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

              a)           all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the  registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting. 

Date: April 23, 2007 

/s/ Stephen C. Donnelly          Stephen C. Donnelly Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) 

 

----