alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 810 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 810

          To establish drawback for imports of N-cyclohexyl-2-
      benzothiazolesulfenamide based on exports of N-tert-Butyl-2-
                       benzothiazolesulfenamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1999

   Mr. Wise (for himself, Mr. Sawyer, and Mr. Neal of Massachusetts) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To establish drawback for imports of N-cyclohexyl-2-
      benzothiazolesulfenamide based on exports of N-tert-Butyl-2-
                       benzothiazolesulfenamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF DRAWBACK BASED ON COMMERCIAL 
              INTERCHANGEABILITY FOR CERTAIN RUBBER VULCANIZATION 
              ACCELERATORS.

    (a) In General.--The United States Customs Service shall treat the 
chemical N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazolesulfenamide and the chemical N-
tert-Butyl-2-benzothiazolesulfenamide as ``commercially 
interchangeable'' within the meaning of section 313(j)(2) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)) for purposes of permitting drawback 
under section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1313.).
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any 
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of the chemical N-
cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazolesulfenamide before, on, or after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, that is eligible for drawback within the 
time period provided in section 313(j)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930 
(19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2)(B)).
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

for himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

AND CERTAIN PRETRIAL DEADLINES

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Joint Motion for Extension of Time for 

Extension of Pretrial Deadlines and Continuance of Trial, ECF No. [199] (“Motion”), filed on

September 5, 2023. The Court has reviewed the Motion, the record, and is otherwise fully advised. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion, ECF No. [199], is 

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and the Scheduling Order, ECF No. [26], is 

AMENDED as follows:

This case is set for trial during the Court’s two-week trial calendar beginning on June 3, 

2024, at 9:00 a.m. Calendar call will be held at 1:45 p.m. on Tuesday, May 28, 2024. No pretrial conference will be held unless a party requests one at a later date and the Court determines 

that one is necessary. Unless instructed otherwise by subsequent order, the trial and all other 

proceedings in this case shall be conducted in Courtroom 10-2 at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. 

United States Courthouse, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, FL 33128. The parties shall 

adhere to the following schedule:

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 206 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

2

January 9, 2024 Parties disclose experts and exchange expert witness summaries or 

reports.

January 23, 2024 Parties exchange rebuttal expert witness summaries or reports.

February 6, 2024 All discovery, including expert discovery, is completed.

February 20, 2024 Parties must have completed mediation and filed a mediation report.

February 28, 2024 All pre-trial motions, motions in limine, and Daubert motions (which 

include motions to strike experts) are filed. This deadline includes all 

dispositive motions.

May 20, 2024 Parties submit joint pre-trial stipulation in accordance with Local Rule 

16.1(e), proposed jury instructions and verdict form, or proposed findings 

of fact and conclusions of law, as applicable.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on September 7, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 206 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32
**Certifications**
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004 of AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of,Jay S. Wintrob, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and N. Scott Gillis,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.     /s/ JAY S. WINTROB   Jay S. Wintrob Chief Executive Officer   /s/ N. SCOTT GILLIS   N. Scott Gillis Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer   Date: November 12, 2004
No. 11-9360.

#### Burnett *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 102-75.298 Can agencies request that GSA be the disposal agency for real property and real property interests described in § 102-75.296?

Yes. If requested, GSA, at its discretion, may be the disposal agency for such real property and real property interests.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0676 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 182

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed c ell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost T otal Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD h ave a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include speci fic requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES NO Explanation:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITEDSTATES CODE**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of AmericanScience & Engineering, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certifythat to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1.             the Company’sReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “10-Q”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             the informationcontained in the 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 9, 2010 | /s/ Anthony R.  Fabiano                              |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Anthony R. Fabiano  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to American Science & Engineering, Inc. and will beretained by American Science & Engineering, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001004540
<NAME> AIRPLANES U S TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        5
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (3)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     9
<PP&E>                                             422
<DEPRECIATION>                                     134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4
<BONDS>                                            342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (163)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       331
<SALES>                                              9
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   137
<CGS>                                             (86)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       19
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (13)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (13)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (13)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 301-70.804 What amount must the Government be reimbursed for travel on a Government aircraft? ( a ) No reimbursement is required for official travel on a Government aircraft.
( b ) For personal travel on Government aircraft, reimbursement depends upon which of the following special cases applies: ( 1 ) You must require a traveler on required-use travel to reimburse the Government for the excess of the full coach fare for all flights taken on a trip over the full coach fare for the flights that the traveler would have taken had they not engaged in personal activities during the trip; and
( 2 ) No reimbursement is required for travel authorized under 10 U.S.C. 2648 and regulations implementing that statute, or when the traveler and the traveler's dependents are stationed by the Government in a remote location with no access to regularly scheduled commercial airline service.
( c ) For political travel on a Government aircraft (*i.e.,* for any trip or part of a trip during which the traveler engages in political activities), you must require that the Government be reimbursed the excess of the full coach fare for all flights taken on the trip over the full coach fare for the flights that the traveler would have taken had they not engaged in political activities, except if other law or regulation specifies a different amount (see, e.g., 11 CFR 106.3, “Allocation of Expenses between Campaign and Non-campaign Related Travel”), in which case the amount reimbursed is the amount required by such law or regulation.
[FTR Amdt. 2004-02, 69 FR 34305, June 21, 2004, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2010-04, 75 FR 59095, Sept. 27, 2010; FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12252, Feb. 16, 2024]
#### § 302-7.109 Are receipts required?

Yes, under the commuted rate system, a receipted copy of the warehouse or other bill for storage is required to support reimbursement.
§ 302-14.5 Under what circumstances will I receive a home marketing incentive payment? You will receive a home marketing incentive payment when: ( a ) You enter your residence in your agency's homesale program;
( b ) You independently and aggressively market your residence;
( c ) You find a bona fide buyer for your residence as a result of your independent marketing efforts;
( d ) You transfer the residence to the relocation services company;
( e ) Your agency pays a reduced fee/expenses to the relocation services company as a result of your independent marketing efforts;
( f ) You meet any additional conditions your agency has established, including but not limited to, mandatory marketing periods, list price guidelines, closing requirements, and residence value caps; and
( g ) Your agency has established a home marketing incentive program.
§ 301-10.200 What types of Government vehicles may my agency authorize me to use? You may be authorized to use: ( a ) A Government-furnished automobile in accordance with § 301-10.220;
( b ) A Government aircraft in accordance with §§ 301-10.260 through 301-10.262 of this part; and
( c ) Other type of Government vehicle in accordance with any Government-issued rules governing its use.
[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15955, Apr. 1, 1998; 63 FR 35537, June 30, 1998; FTR Amdt. 2015-03, 80 FR 27261, May 13, 2015]
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 32.2

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Angelica Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 26, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
T. M. Armstrong, Senior Vice President - Finance & Administration and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

            (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

            (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly
                      presents, in all material respects, the financial
                      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  September 4, 2003

                                        /s/ T. M. Armstrong
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        T. M. Armstrong
                                        Senior Vice President - Finance and
                                        Administration and Chief Financial
                                        Officer of Angelica Corporation
No. 11-8938.

#### Reyes *v.*Adams, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:









1.
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.



































_________________________


Robert A.
Paul


Chairman
and


Chief
Executive Officer


May 9,
2008
§ 301-10.308 What will I be reimbursed if I park my POV at a common carrier terminal while I am away from my official station? Your agency may reimburse your parking fee as an allowable transportation expense not to exceed the cost of one of the following to/from the terminal as determined by your agency: ( a ) The cost of a taxi.
( b ) The cost of a TNC fare.
( c ) The cost of using an innovative mobility technology company.
[FTR Amdt. 2017-01, 83 FR 604, Jan. 5, 2018]
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 856

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction

allowed for interest on education loans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Mr. CAMPBELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the deduction allowed for interest on education loans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION ALLOWED FOR IN4 TEREST ON EDUCATION LOANS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The table contained in paragraph

6 (1) of section 221(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of

7 1986 (relating to general rule for maximum deduction) is

8 amended to read as follows:

‘‘In the case of taxable years The dollar

beginning in: amount is:

1999 ....................................................................... $2,000

2000 ....................................................................... $3,000
2

•HR 856 IH

2001 ....................................................................... $4,000

2002 or thereafter ................................................. $5,000.’’.

1 (b) REVENUE OFFSET.—

2 (1) MODIFICATION OF RATES OF CORPORATE

3 TAX.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe

4 rates of tax under section 11 of the Internal Reve5 nue Code of 1986 (relating to tax imposed on cor6 porations) which result in a net increase in revenues

7 for a taxable year equal to the net decrease in reve8 nues for that year as a result of the amendment

9 made by subsection (a).

10 (2) ESTIMATES AND SUBSEQUENT ADJUST11 MENTS.—The rates of tax prescribed under para12 graph (1) shall be determined on the basis of esti13 mates made by the Secretary of the Treasury. Ad14 justments shall be made in such rates for succeeding

15 taxable years to the extent prior estimates resulted

16 in revenues which were in excess of or less than the

17 revenues required under paragraph (1).

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

19 this section shall apply to interest due and paid after

20 December 31, 1998.

Æ
387P15

#### State v. Judy Hardison

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-150)

1. Allowed 11/23/2105

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3.
#### § 301-74.22 When should actual expense reimbursement be authorized for conference attendees?

You may authorize actual expenses under § 301-11.300 of this chapter when the applicable lodging rate is inadequate.

[FTR Amdt. 2013-01, 78 FR 65212, Oct. 31, 2013]
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06096

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06096\06096_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06096\06096_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06096\06096_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06096\06096_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06096\06096_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06096\06096_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06096\06096_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06096\06096_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06096\06096_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06096\06096_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06096\06096_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

06096\Certification Statement Plant ID 06096.pdf Plant certification statement

06096\Supplemental Documents\06096_AES Deepwater MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06096\Supplemental Documents\06096_AES Deepwater WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06096\Supplemental Documents\06096_Follow Up Response.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 06096\Supplemental Documents\0696_Follow Up Responses 2.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 102-37.535 What information must FAA provide to GSA on its administration of the public airport donation program? So that GSA has information on which to base its discretionary authority to approve the donation of surplus personal property, FAA must: ( a ) Provide copies of internal instructions that outline the scope of FAA's oversight program for enforcing compliance with the terms and conditions of transfer; and
( b ) Report any compliance actions involving donations to public airports.
No. 10-11063.

#### Pinson *v.*Chipi et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00233-CR

JOSEPH DINGLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1749454)

October 26, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
404 A.2d 1354

#### Commonwealth v. Davey, Appellant.

Submitted September 15, 1978.

Paul Sotak, for appellant; Ernest D. Preate, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before VAN der VOORT, WATKINS and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Order affirmed on the opinion of the court below.
Due to the file size of ADEQ’s CALPUFF modeling files, they are not available from the 

electronic docket. These files are available upon request.

Please email your request to: Michael Feldman (feldman.michael@epa.gov) or call 

214-665-7200.

Thank you.