alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,268 and TA-W-37,268A]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 1, 2000, applicable to workers of Hampton Industries, Inc., Warrenton, North Carolina. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 15, 2000 (65 FR 7563).                

At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that worker separations will occur at Hampton Industries' Washington, North Carolina facility when it closes in August, 2000. The workers are engaged in the production of men's and boys' casual shirts.

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover workers at Hampton Industries, Inc., Washington, North Carolina. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Hampton Industries, Inc. adversely affected by increased imports.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,268 is hereby issued as follows:

“All workers of Hampton Industries, Inc., Warrenton, North Carolina (TA-W-37,268) and Washington, North Carolina (TA-W-37,268A) who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 24, 1999 through February 1, 2002 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.”

Signed at Washington DC this 20th day of June, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-16497  Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the ***

District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHNNY GONZALES, aka Johnny

Gonzalez,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-70484

Agency No. A072-531-638

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 15, 2013** 

San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, District ***

Judge. 

 

Petitioner Johnny Gonzales petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ ("BIA") denial of relief from removal. Reviewing for substantial

FILED

APR 18 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

evidence, Zhiqiang Hu v. Holder, 652 F.3d 1011, 1016 (9th Cir. 2011), we deny

the petition.

1. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Petitioner failed to

show that he suffered past persecution on account of a protected ground under 8

U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1). The record does not compel the conclusion that Petitioner

suffered harm rising to the level of persecution on account of his religion during

the one incident in which Petitioner hid under the bed. Even assuming that

Petitioner fell within a purported social group of "sexually exploited, abandoned

Guatemalan children," see generally Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738,

745–46 (9th Cir. 2008), the record does not compel the conclusion that his

attackers attacked him because of his membership in that group.

2. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Petitioner failed to

show that he has a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of a

protected ground under 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1). We have previously rejected, as

bearing no nexus to a protected ground, a petitioner’s argument that "he was afraid

of gang violence because he had tattoos that gang members might mistake as a sign

of membership in a rival gang." Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir.

2010).
3

3. Because Petitioner has shown neither past persecution nor fear of future

persecution, his asylum claim fails. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b).

4. "Because [Petitioner’s] asylum claim fails, [he] necessarily cannot satisfy

the more stringent standard of proof required to demonstrate eligibility for

withholding of removal." Loho v. Mukasey, 531 F.3d 1016, 1019 (9th Cir. 2008).

5. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Petitioner failed

to establish his eligibility for relief under the Convention Against Torture.

Petition DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             7
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>          2,568,138
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>         2,614,208
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>           2,614,208
<EQUITIES>                       33,211
<MORTGAGE>                            0
<REAL-ESTATE>                         0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                2,689,149
<CASH>                           43,436
<RECOVER-REINSURE>              247,269
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>          182,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                3,281,557
<POLICY-LOSSES>               3,002,153
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                   0
<POLICY-OTHER>                        0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>             7,362
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                  0
<COMMON>                         16,438
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                      174,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3,281,557
<PREMIUMS>                       10,451
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>             139,704
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                4,792
<OTHER-INCOME>                    1,473
<BENEFITS>                      104,500
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>      11,467
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>             14,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  23,702
<INCOME-TAX>                      8,414
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              15,288
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    (269)
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     15,019
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                      1.15
<RESERVE-OPEN>                        0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                   0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                     0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                    0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                      0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                       0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>               0 
        

</TABLE>
#### § 303-70.501 Must we continue payment of relocation expenses for an employee's immediate family if the employee dies while in transit from an OCONUS official station to the employee's new official station within CONUS?

Yes, if the immediate family chooses to continue the relocation, you must continue payment of relocation expenses for the immediate family, provided the immediate family was included on the employee's relocation travel orders. (See § 303-70.503.)

[FTR Amdt. 2013-02, 78 FR 73106, Dec. 5, 2013, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12257, Feb. 16, 2024]
Exhibit 10.1


 


January 24, 2017







Edward Schatz


The O’Connor Group, Inc.


10 Stearns Road


Bedford, MA  01730







Re:          Amendment to Engagement Agreement dated September 27, 2016







Dear Mr. Schatz:







This letter (“Amendment”) will serve to outline the modifications to the Engagement Agreement dated September 27, 2016 (“Agreement”), entered into between Cosi, Inc. (the “Company”) and The O’Connor Group, Inc. (“TOG”) regarding the engagement of TOB, specifically Mr. Edward Schatz, by the Company.







In addition to serving as the acting CFO of the Company and providing services relating thereto as set forth in the Agreement, you agree, subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court, to serve as the acting CEO of the Company and to perform the duties of and relating to such position, effective as of January 6, 2017, and continuing until the effective date of the plan of reorganization of the Company.







For your services as acting CEO of the Company, while continuing to serve as acting CFO of the Company, the Company agrees to increase your compensation under the Agreement to a flat fee of $25,000 per month, effective on the date of your appointment, subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court.    While serving as acting CEO of the Company, you will report to the Company’s board of directors.







You acknowledge that LIMAB LLC (“LIMAB”), as the winning bidder in the 363 sale process, is currently serving as the Operator and managing the day-to-day operations of the Company pursuant to the Interim Operating Agreement entered into between the Company and LIMAB.







Except as set forth above, the terms of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.  Hereinafter, references to the Agreement shall mean the Agreement as amended, modified and supplemented by this Amendment.







	 	
Very truly yours,


	 	 	 
	 	
/s/Vicki Baue

	 
	 	
COSI, INC.

	 
	 	
By:

	
Vicki Baue

	 
	 	
Its:

	
V. P. & General Counsel

	 
	 	
Date:

	
02/02/17

	 









	
Agreed and accepted:

	 
	 	 
	
/s/Edward Schatz

	 
	
THE O’CONNOR GROU, INC.

	 
	
By: Edward Schatz

	 
	
Its:  Senior Managing Director

	 
	
Date:  02/02/17
#### § 109-27.5106-5 Assistance.

The Business Center for Precious Metals Sales and Recovery operates the precious metals pool. DOE organizations and contractors may obtain specific information regarding the operation of the precious metals pool (operating contractor's name, address, and telephone number; processing charges; etc.) by contacting the Chief, Property Management Branch.
#### IN THE MATTER OF ARTHUR P. TRANAKOS.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 702)

(381 SE2d 387)

Per curiam.

Arthur P. Tranakos, a member of the State Bar of Georgia, was, on January 11, 1989, found guilty of the offenses of conspiracy to commit fraud against the United States, assisting in the preparation of false tax returns for 1979 and 1980, and obstruction of justice in the U. S. District Court of Wyoming. Tranakos received a sentence of four-years imprisonment on Count 1 and five-years probation on the remaining counts. Tranakos’ appeal of his conviction is currently pending before the U. S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Standard 66 of Rule 4-102 of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia provides: “Conviction of any felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude shall be grounds for disbarment.” Pursuant to Rule 4-106, a lawyer convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude may be suspended from the practice of law until all appeal rights are terminated.

The special master appointed under Rule 4-106 found that Tranakos had been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude and filed his recommendation with this Court that Tranakos be suspended from the practice of law pending his appeal pursuant to State Bar Rule 4-106.

We have reviewed the file and accept, concur in and adopt the recommendation of the special master.

We hereby order that respondent Tranakos be suspended from the practice of law pending the termination of his appeal rights, at which time the State Bar of Georgia may conduct further proceedings pursuant to Rule 4-106(f).

*All the Justices concur.*

*386Decided July 27, 1989.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Joe Dauid Jackson, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Michael Duke Bolen,*for Tranakos.
No. 10-11257.

#### Detres *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: 19-1001: CUSTOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. DISH NETWORK CORPORATION [ORDER], Precedential
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 08-0199 Focus Ready Draft 2/21/2008

ENGINEER: Arnold PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Label: No

TLV/PEL:

CRSS (02/04/2008):

Chemical Name:

S-H20:

VP:

MW: 10000.00 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use:

SAT (concerns) (02/05/2008): Migration to groundwat er: Score is "U" PBT rating: P3B1T1 Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalati on, XB Testing (Health testing desired) Eco: 1 Not Required, XB Testi ng (No eco testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 08-0199CBI: No

MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

CALL BY: Organization:

CALL TO:

Organization:

Date: 02/12/2008

Time: 9:40 AM

Phone:

Concerning what TS CA CBI? PMN: 08-0199
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4198

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

to require that OMB and CBO estimates for paygo purposes score

increased revenues caused by economic growth resulting from legislation

implementing any trade agreement.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 13, 1994

Mr. EWING (for himself, Mr. PARKER, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr.

ROHRABACHER, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. LEWIS of Florida, Mr.

HASTERT, Mr. WALKER, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr.

RAMSTAD, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, and Mr. BOEHNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Operations

A BILL

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to require that OMB and CBO estimates for paygo purposes score increased revenues

caused by economic growth resulting from legislation implementing any trade agreement.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 252(d) of the Balanced Budget and Emer4 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended—
2

•HR 4198 IH

1 (1) in the last sentence, by inserting ‘‘Except as

2 provided by the next sentence,’’ before ‘‘OMB’’ the

3 first place it appears; and

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new sen5 tence: ‘‘OMB and CBO estimates prepared under

6 this subsection respecting legislation implementing a

7 trade agreement entered into between the United

8 States and one or more foreign countries shall take

9 into account increased revenue caused by economic

10 growth resulting from that legislation to offset any

11 loss in tariff revenues due to that legislation.’’.

Æ
No. 10-11003.

#### Brown *v.*Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Order entered January 10, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 00083
- CR
SHAMONT DESMOND SMALL, , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. F05
- 26251
- W 

### O RDER On April 27, 2012, the appeal was abated for findings regarding appellant’s brief. On May 15, 2012, the Court granted appellant’s motion to extend time to file his brief and ordered the brief filed as of the date of that order. The May 15, 2012 order, however, did not formally reinstate the appeal. Accordingly, we DIRECT the Clerk to show the appeal is reinstated as of May 15, 2012.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31.2


**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I, James W. Shaffer, certify that:





1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Angelica Corporation;





2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and(c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely











affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: December 9, 2004








/s/ James W. ShafferJames W. ShafferVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of Angelica Corporation
















2
# Comments on: 20-1037: IMMUNEX CORPORATION v. SANDOZ INC. [OPINION], Precedential
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No's. 333-1872, 333-3164 and 333-71993) pertaining to the 1995 Stock
Option Plan, as amended, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the 1995
Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan of CyberCash, Inc., (ii) the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-51649) relating to the 1995 Stock
Option Plan of ICVerify, Inc., (iii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-71709) relating to the 1999 Restricted Stock Plan of CyberCash, Inc., (iv)
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-34303) relating to the Common Stock
issuable upon conversion of the Company's Series C Convertible Preferred Stock,
and (v) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-46965) relating to the
Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Company's Series D Convertible
Preferred Stock, the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Investment
Options issued contemparaneously with the Series D Preferred Stock, (vi) the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-51495) relating to the Common Stock
issued in consideration of the outstanding stock of ICVerify, Inc., and (vii)
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-71895) relating to Common Stock
issued and common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants issued by the
Company, of our reports dated January 26, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of CyberCash, Inc. included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Vienna, Virginia
March 30, 1999
Exhibit








OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION SAVINGS PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2018)
First Amendment
WHEREAS, Occidental Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”) has previously adopted and maintains the Occidental Petroleum Corporation Savings Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2018 (the “Plan”), for the benefit of its eligible employees and eligible employees of its affiliates that have adopted the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Occidental Petroleum Corporation Pension and Retirement Plan Administrative Committee (the “Committee”) has the right under Section 13.1 of the Plan to amend the Plan at any time and from time to time on behalf of the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to clarify that certain Anadarko Petroleum Corporation employees who are “Third Country Nationals” are excluded from participation in the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the definition of “Eligible Employee” in Section 2.1(z) of the Plan to add a new subsection (5), effective as of August 8, 2019, to read as follows:
		
	“(5)
	Any Employee of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation who is not a citizen or legal resident of the United States and is not regularly employed at a worksite of Employer within the United States shall not be eligible to participate in the Plan.”




[Signature Page Follows]




Active 41294043.5    1







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused these presents to be executed by its duly authorized officer, effective as of the date set forth herein.


OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
By: /s/ Darin S. Moss    
Name: Darin S. Moss    
Title:   VP – Human Resources    




Active 41294043.5    2
§ 304-6.5 What guidelines must we follow when using the Standard Form (SF) 326? When completing the SF 326— ( a ) You must fully complete each block on SF 326 without exception (including payments accepted for an accompanying spouse).
( b ) You must also— ( 1 ) Submit the SF 326 no later than May 31 for payments received from the preceding October 1 through March 31;
( 2 ) Submit a SF 326 no later than November 30 for payments received from the preceding April 1 through September 30; and
( c ) Submit the SF 326 including negative reports, to: Director of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005-3917.