alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AHMAD J. SMITH,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3614

Opinion filed September 4, 2014.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Ahmad J. Smith, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the 

merits.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 300-70.101 What information must we report on the use of first class and business class transportation accommodations?

GSA issues FTR bulletins that inform you of the required information and reporting format(s) for each trip where you paid for at least one segment of first class or business class transportation accommodations that were more expensive than coach class accommodations for the same itinerary. FTR bulletins are updated as necessary and available at *https://www.gsa.gov/ftrbulletins.*

[FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55702, Sept. 12, 2022]
§ 102-75.750 Who is eligible to receive surplus real and related personal property for correctional facility, law enforcement, or emergency management response purposes? Under 40 U.S.C. 553, the head of the disposal agency or designee may, in his or her discretion, convey, without monetary consideration, to any State, or to those governmental bodies named in the section; or to any political subdivision or instrumentality, surplus real and related personal property for— ( a ) Correctional facility purposes, if the Attorney General has determined that the property is required for such purposes and has approved an appropriate program or project for the care or rehabilitation of criminal offenders;
( b ) Law enforcement purposes, if the Attorney General has determined that the property is required for such purposes; or
( c ) Emergency management response purposes, including fire and rescue services, if the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has determined that the property is required for such purposes.
Gordon Bennett FlyingMonkey2@hotmail.com Flashnine@msn.com TELE: 1+717-571-2274 

### Feb, 13, 2015

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 NewJersey Ave.,SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Section 333, addendum to docket: Waiver number 14777 or FAA -2015-1392 Flying MonkeyAerial requests to add these aircraft to Waiver number 14777 or FAA -2015-1392 1 -Dji phantom 3 professional quad copter, with camera gimbals and video cameras weighing 3825grams or8.432 Lbs. contain auto pilotfunction and geo -fencing capabilities. Manufacture DJI , Model, Phantom 3 Professional 1 Ranger ex V757-3 fixed wing ,single electric motor, aircraft with apm 2.6 auto pilot and geo fencing capabilities .a video camera and transmitterweighing a total of4309.125 or 9.5 Lbs. manufacture: Volantex RC, model Ranger, fixed wing rc airplane. Auto pilotfunctions by Flying MonkeyAerial Videography Been approved already forthese aircraft; 2- Walkera 350 pro Quad Copters, with camera gimbals and video cameras weighing 3550 grams or 7.92 Lbs. both contain auto pilotfunction and geo -fencing capabilities. 1- Foam american eagle look alike fixed wing ,single electric motor, aircraft ,with apm 2.6 auto pilot and geo fencing capabilities .a video camera and transmitterweighing atotal of4.3 Lbs. manufactures : hobby king models forfix wing rc airplane. Auto pilotfunctions by Flying MonkeyAerial Videography 1-14Ft. Helium blimp tethered, Manufacturers Arizona balloon company, with no motors, with a amp 2.6 auto pilot system in itfortelemetry forgeo fencing capabilities. This system 

### is set upforvideo services by Flying MonkeyAerial Videography ,and apm 2.6 is the fail safe for auto deflate in case offly away. telemetry with gps down linkfor location. (Safety First) Total Weight with Cameras, and Transmitters 9 Lbs. Regards Gordon Bennett

# Jt~/3
§ 109-45.304-51 Documentation. Files pertaining to surplus property sales shall contain copies of all documents necessary to provide a complete record of the sales transactions and shall include the following as appropriate: ( a ) A copy of the request/invitation for bids if a written request/invitation for bids is employed. A list of items or lots sold, indicating acquisition cost, upset price and sales price indicated.
( b ) A copy of the advertising literature distributed to prospective bidders.
( c ) A list of prospective bidders solicited.
( d ) An abstract of bids received.
( e ) Copies of bids received, including Standard Form 119, Contractor's Statement of Contingent or Other Fees, together with other relevant information.
( f ) A statement concerning the basis for determination that proceeds constitute a reasonable return for property sold.
( g ) When appropriate, full and adequate justification for not advertising the sale when the fair market value of property sold in this manner in any one case exceeds $1,000.
( h ) A justification concerning any award made to other than the high bidder.
( i ) The approval of the reviewing authority when required.
( j ) A copy of the notice of award.
( k ) All related correspondence.
( l ) In the case of auction or spot bid sales, the following additional information should be included: ( 1 ) A summary listing of the advertising used (*e.g.,* newspapers, radio, television, and public postings).
( 2 ) The names of the prospective bidders who attended the sale.
( 3 ) A copy of any pertinent contract for auctioneering services and related documents.
( 4 ) A reference to files containing record of deposits and payments.
No. 11-1123.

#### Kiburz *v.*Mabus, Secretary of the Navy.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:









1.
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.























___________________________


Marliss D.
Johnson


Vice
President


Controller
and Treasurer


May 9,
2008
No. 10-10966.

#### Cardenas *v.*San Antonio Police Department et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 109-50.000 Scope of part.

This part provides guidance on the policies, practices, and procedures for the disposal of DOE property under special legislative authorities.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           3,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,524
<ALLOWANCES>                                       285
<INVENTORY>                                        169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,549
<PP&E>                                           7,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,274
<BONDS>                                          1,851
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,535
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,148
<SALES>                                         27,478
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,478
<CGS>                                           24,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    321
<INCOME-TAX>                                       131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                187
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       187
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aavid Thermal
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Bharatan R. Patel, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: March 28, 2005

                                        /s/ Bharatan R. Patel
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bharatan R. Patel
                                        Chairman, President
                                        and Chief Executive Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4173

To amend the Small Business Act to provide for expanded participation

in the microloan demonstration program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1994

Mr. MACHTLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To amend the Small Business Act to provide for expanded

participation in the microloan demonstration program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LOAN GUARANTEES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7(m)(3) of the Small

5 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)(3)) is amended by add6 ing at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(I) LOAN GUARANTEES.—The Adminis8 tration may make loans to intermediaries under

9 this subsection either directly or in cooperation

10 with banks or other financial institutions
2

•HR 4173 IH

1 through agreements to participate on an imme2 diate or deferred (guaranteed) basis. Participa3 tion in deferred participation loans under this

4 subsection shall be subject to the terms and

5 conditions applicable to participation in such

6 loans under subsection (a); except that for any

7 loan under this subsection such participation

8 shall be equal to 100 percent of the balance of

9 the financing outstanding at the time of dis10 bursement.’’.

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 7(m) of

12 such Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)) is amended—

13 (1) in paragraph (1)(B)(i) by striking ‘‘direct’’;

14 and

15 (2) in paragraph (3)(H) by striking ‘‘subpara16 graphs (B) and (D)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraphs

17 (B), (D), and (I)’’.

18 SEC. 2. STATE FUNDING LIMITATIONS.

19 Section 7(m)(7)(C) of the Small Business Act (15

20 U.S.C. 636(m)(7)(C)) is amended—

21 (1) by striking clause (i);

22 (2) by redesignating clauses (ii) and (iii) as

23 clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; and
3

•HR 4173 IH

1 (3) in clause (i), as so redesignated, by striking

2 ‘‘such programs’’ and inserting ‘‘microloan pro3 grams’’.

4 SEC. 3. MICROLOAN INTERMEDIARIES.

5 Section 7(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C.

6 636(m)) is amended—

7 (1) in paragraph (11)(A)(iv) by inserting ‘‘, ex8 cept as provided by paragraph (12),’’ after ‘‘other

9 than’’; and

10 (2) by adding at the end the following:

11 ‘‘(12) MUNICIPAL AGENCIES AND INSTRUMEN12 TALITIES.—An agency or instrumentality of a mu13 nicipal government shall be considered to be a quasi14 governmental economic development entity under

15 paragraph (11)(A)(iv) if the agency or instrumental16 ity—

17 ‘‘(A) has a governing body with a majority

18 of its members from the private sector; and

19 ‘‘(B) is not under the direct administrative

20 control of the municipal government.

21 For the purposes of this paragraph, the use of pub22 lic employees by an agency or instrumentality of a

23 municipal government shall not be considered to

24 constitute direct administrative control by the mu25 nicipal government and shall not otherwise affect the
4

•HR 4173 IH

1 eligibility of the agency or instrumentality as a

2 quasi-governmental economic development entity.’’.

Æ
|        |
|--------|
|   |  | - About Us    - NEA Guide
  - NEA Arts Magazine
  - Staff Directory
  - Discipline Directors
  - National Council on the Arts
  - Annual Reports
  - Employment
  - Other... 
- Grants    - Apply for a Grant
  - Manage Your Award
  - Recent Grants 
- Recovery
- News Room
- NEA Initiatives    - MICD25
  - Blue Star Museums
  - Poetry Out Loud
  - The Big Read
  - NEA Jazz Initiative
  - Operation Homecoming
  - American Masterpieces
  - NEA Arts Journalism Institutes
  - Shakespeare in American Communities
  - Great American Voices 
- Lifetime Honors    - NEA National Heritage Fellowships
  - NEA Jazz Masters Fellowships
  - NEA Opera Honors
  - National Medal of Arts 
- Podcast & Webcast
- Publications   
- Research    - Research Reports
  - Research Notes
  - Research Brochures
  - ERIC Listings
  - Research Convenings 
- NEA Partners    - Arts Education
  - State & Regional Partnerships
  - Federal Partnerships
  - International
  - Design 
- Resources    - Accessibility
  - Discipline Resources
  - Funding
  - Planning 
- Features    - NEA Spotlight
  - Writers' Corner
  - Interviews
  - NEA Highlights
  - Big Read Blog 
- Donate |
|   | controls rotating picture in main window
FOIA  |  Privacy Policy  |  EEO  |  Site Map  |                   Accessibilty  |  Open Government  |  NEA Inspector General  |  Contact Us

 

1100 Pennsylvania Ave. NWWashington, DC 20506202.682.5400webmgr@arts.gov |
§ 102-38.20 Must an executive agency follow the regulations of this part when selling all personal property? Generally, yes, an executive agency must follow the regulations of this part when selling all personal property; however— ( a ) Materials acquired for the national stockpile or supplemental stockpile, or materials or equipment acquired under section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2093) are excepted from this part;
( b ) The Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation, has jurisdiction over the disposal of vessels of 1,500 gross tons or more and determined by the Secretary to be merchant vessels or capable of conversion to merchant use;
( c ) Sales made by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2576 (Sale of Surplus Military Equipment to State and Local Law Enforcement and Firefighting Agencies) are exempt from these provisions;
( d ) Foreign excess personal property is exempt from these provisions; and
( e ) Agency sales procedures which are mandated or authorized under laws other than Title 40 United States Code are exempt from this part.
[73 FR 20802, Apr. 17, 2008]
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Celulosa Arauco y Constitución S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

Date: April 29, 2014



/s/ Matías DomeykoName:   Matías DomeykoTitle:     Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 29, 2014



/s/ Robinson TajmuchName:   Robinson TajmuchTitle:     Senior Vice-President Comptroller
629P01-4

#### State v. John Edward Butler

Defs *Pro Se*Petition tor Writ of Certiorari to Review Order of COA (COAP14-558)

Denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<LEGEND>    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
            THE AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED
            CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND CONSOLIDATED
            CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
            31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
            FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                          2,143,239
<SECURITIES>                                                      561,402
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   2,245,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                     1,714,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               12,806,892
<PP&E>                                                          6,681,722
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  2,380,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 23,480,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           7,124,801
<BONDS>                                                         3,634,109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                            59
<COMMON>                                                          434,518
<OTHER-SE>                                                      5,817,808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   23,480,425
<SALES>                                                         3,336,495
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                3,336,495
<CGS>                                                             826,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     826,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  442,925
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 43,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 2,572,375
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      826,366
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             1,746,009
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 (1,469,647)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      276,362
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0.21







</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 30616 Su m m ar y C al endar

UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee

v. J OD Y RU SS ELL , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he E as t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 2: 06- C R

- 160- 4

B ef ore B E N AV ID E S , P R A D O an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Jod y R u ssel lapp eal s t h e den i alof h e r m ot i on t o reduce h er s en t en ce p u r s u a n t t o 1 8 U .S .C

. § 3 5 8 2 (c ), in w h ic h s h e a r g u e d th a t h e rs e n te n c e s h o u ld be redu ced based on the am en dm en tt o t h e G u i del i n e add ress i n g crack coc ai n e. Th e di st r i c tc our tdeni ed t he m ot i on o n th e ground t hat R uss el l ’ s or i gi nal
se nt enc e o f

51 m on th s w a s w i t hi n t he r educ ed g ui del i nes r ange o f 41 t o 5 1
m on th s i n pr i son . R u sse l lav ers th a t t h i s rea son i s l eg a l l y in su ff i ci en t. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 18, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 08-30616 Document: 00511029645 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/18/2010N o. 08- 30616

2 In her § 358 2( c) m ot i on , R u ssel laverred th at, i n fash i on i n g a redu ced sente n ce, t h e sentenci n g j u dg e w as obl i gated to t ak e i n t o accoun tt h e pri or s e nt e n c e i m p o s e d a n d wa s t o c o n s i d e r t h e 1 8 U. S

. C. § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) fa c t o r s . The di st ri ctcourti m pl i ci t l y h ad bef ore i tt h ose f

act ors R u ssel lnow contends i tfai l ed to con sider , an d th i s cou rt can ass u m e th a t i t con sider ed tho se factors pr i or to d e n y in gR u s s e ll’ s § 3 5 8 2 (c ) m o tio n . S ee Uni t e d St at e s v . Evan s , 587 F. 3d 667, 6 7 3 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 9 ). T h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s fai l u re t o pr o v ide f u rt h er expl an ati on f o rde nyi ng Russ e l l ’ s § 358 2( c ) m o t i o n di d notco ns t i t ut e an a bus e o f di s c r e t i o n. S ee Evans , 5 87 F. 3d a t 67 2, 67 4 (ho l di ng t hat a di s t r i c tc o ur tne e d no tpr o vi de
a n y re a so n s a t a llfor d e n y in ga § 3 5 8 2 (c)(2 ) m o tion ). T h e s e n t e n c e i s A F F I RMED. Case: 08-30616 Document: 00511029645 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/18/2010
# Comments on: 21-2069: TALEXMEDICAL, LLC v. BECON MEDICAL LIMITED [OPINION], Nonprecedential