alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

Case No.: 1:22-cv-23753-KMM 

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al., 

Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

APPEAR PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT 

TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO 

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE 

NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO 

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING 

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Joseph J. Vescera, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having considered 

the motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 

The Motion is GRANTED. Joseph J. Vescera, may appear and participate in this action on 

behalf of Specially Appearing Defendant Sam Trabucco. The Clerk shall provide electronic 

notification of all electronic filings to Joseph J. Vescera, at jvescera@mayerbrown.com. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at , Florida, this 

of . 

 

 K. Michael Moore 

 United States District Judge 

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 145-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

I, John M. Slusser certify that: 

 

1.      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Performance Technologies, Incorporated;

 

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

                                                                                                               John M. Slusser

                                                                                                               Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned herebycertifies in his capacity as Interim CFO of Analysts International Corporation(“The Company”) that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 27, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financialcondition of the Company at the end of such period and the results ofoperations of the Company for such period.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AnalystsInternational and will be retained by Analysts International and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:   November 11, 2003 | By:    | /s/ David J. Steichen           |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   | David J. Steichen               |   |
|                            |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
#### § 304-9.6 Must we reduce an employee's reimbursement when a donor pays for items for which we are not authorized to reimburse the employee?

No, when a donor pays for travel expenses that the Government is not authorized to pay (such as travel expenses for an employee's family) no reduction in reimbursement to the employee is required.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

Date/ Time: July 23, 2010 / 1:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.

Subject: Aldicarb Meeting Minutes. OPP Meet s with Bayer Crop-Science to Discuss Options for Mitigating Dietary Ri sks of Concern Resulting from Aldicarb Exposure

From: K. Avivah Jakob, Chemical Review Manager Re-evaluation Managment and Implimentation Branch IV Pestcide Re-evaulation Division (7508P)

Partcipants: Anne Overstreet (EPA), K. Avivah Jakob (E PA), Laurel Celeste (EPA), Marianne Mannix (EPA), Richard Keigwin (EPA ), Steven Bradbury (EPA); Alan Ayers (Bayer Crop-Science), Bill Fereguson (Bayer Crop-Science), Ian Kelly (Bayer Crop Science), Peg Ch erney (Bayer Crop-Science)

Meeting Minutes: The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) O ffice of Pesticide Programs (OPP) requested a second meeting with Bayer Crop-Sc ience (Bayer) to further discu ss possible options to mitigate dietary risks of concern identif ied in EPA’s revised 2010 dieatr y exposure and risk assessment

for aldicarb. The revised 2010 di etary risk assessment is base d on comparative cholinesterase assay (CCA) and new food and residue data which were recently submitted to the Agency. EPA’s revised dietary exposure and risk assessment indicates that aldicarb no longer meets the Agency’s rigorous food safety standards and may pose unacceptable dietary risks, especially to infants and young children.

EPA met with Bayer (technical registrant of aldicarb) for a second time on July 23, 2010, as follow-up to the July 15, 2010 aldicarb meeting. During the meeting EPA provided Bayer with a signed copy of the Aldicarb. Acute Probabilistic Aggre gate Dietary (Food and Drinking Water) Exposure and Risk Assessment Incorporating Revised FQPA Factor document, dated July 15, 2010. EPA and Bayer discussed possible options to mitigate dietary risks of concern identified in the revised 2010 dietary risk assessment. Mitigation options that were discussed included possible maximum application rate reductions and po ssible cancelation of cer tain aldicarb uses. EPA has requested to meet for a third time with Bayer (during the week of July 25, 2010) to

further continue its discussions w ith the registrant to expeditiously address the identified risks of

concern.
#### § 301-71.304 Are we responsible for ensuring the collection of outstanding travel advances?

Yes.

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15974, Apr. 1, 1998. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 108, 67 FR 57967, Sept. 13, 2002]
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Analysts International Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, Brittany B.McKinney, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Randy W. Strobel,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 4,  2010 | By:    | /s/ Brittany B. McKinney                       |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Brittany B. McKinney                           |   |
|                          |   | Interim President and  Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                          |   |                                           |   |
| Dated: November 4,  2010 | By:    | /s/ Randy W. Strobel                           |   |
|                          |   | Randy W. Strobel                               |   |
|                          |   | Chief Financial Officer                        |   |

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT

2000 Drayton Drive

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950

Telephone No. (850)488-6151

April 11, 2017

CASE NO.: 1D16-5205

L.T. No.: 2016-CA-2052

Dr. Erwin D. Jackson v. Leon County Elections Canvassing

Board, et al.

Appellant / Petitioner(s), Appellee / Respondent(s)

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Motion for en banc consideration, filed by respondent on November 21, 2016, is denied.

Rowe and Kelsey, JJ., concur. Makar, J., would grant the motion for rehearing en banc.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is (a true copy of) the original court order.

Served:

Stephen M. Slepin

Charles B. Upton

Dan R. Stengle

Hon. Karen A. Gievers, Judge

Louis C. Norvell

Hon. Gwen Marshall, Clerk

am
# Comments on: 20-1921: ZAXCOM, INC. v. LECTROSONICS, INC. [OPINION], Nonprecedential
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                      11,361,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,025,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,460,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 30,771,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,187,000
<PP&E>                                       8,103,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,517,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,230,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,828,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,694,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,230,000
<SALES>                                    139,234,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           139,234,000
<CGS>                                      107,081,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              129,698,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (29,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,568,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,137,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,229,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61
        

</TABLE>
#### § 128-1.5002-9 Supply support system.

The sum of all actions taken in providing buildings, equipment, supplies, and services to support program areas.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD 

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION

MEMORANDUM

 

SUBJECT: November 18, 2009 Meeting with Denso in Southfield, MI 

FROM: Brian Nelson 

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472 

DATE: March 15, 2010 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

On November 18, 2009, we met with Denso at their North American Engineering Division in 

Southfield, MI to discuss air conditioning-related topics in the September 28, 2009 Proposed 

Rulemaking To Establish Light-Duty Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate 

Average Fuel Economy. Topics included a general discussion of credits for improving air 

conditioning system efficiency, how to define ‘improved’ air conditioning components, and the 

A/C CO2 Idle Test. 

In addition, we were given a tour of the air conditioning test facility and equipment at this 

location. 

Attendees from Denso were: 

Kwangtaek Hong 

Bryan Styles 

Attendees from EPA were: 

Tony Fernandez 

Brian Nelson
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00321

- CR

SAUL MARQUEZ GARZA

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Calhoun County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- CR

- 7954

- DC

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consider ed this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1996 10QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         144,000                 100,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,109,000               2,035,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,253,000               2,135,000
<PP&E>                                      20,614,000              33,442,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (12,020,000)            (13,055,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,194,000              23,105,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          606,000               4,887,000
<BONDS>                                      4,594,000               9,147,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,786,000                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,031,000               2,126,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,177,000               6,945,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,194,000              23,105,000
<SALES>                                      2,780,000               7,432,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,845,000               7,474,000
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,884,000               4,924,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159,000                 662,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (198,000)              1,888,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                   5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (198,000)              1,883,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                     (597,000)               (411,000)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (795,000)              1,472,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.04)                    .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 848

For the relief of Sepandan Farnia and Farbod Farnia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Mr. ISTOOK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Sepandan Farnia and Farbod Farnia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR

4 SEPANDAN FARNIA AND FARBOD FARNIA.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Sepandan Farnia and Farbod Farnia shall each be

8 eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjust9 ment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for

10 permanent residence upon filing an application for

11 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such
2

•HR 848 IH

1 Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resi2 dent.

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Sepandan Farnia

4 or Farbod Farnia enters the United States before the fil5 ing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be consid6 ered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if

7 otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status

8 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

9 as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap12 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica13 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

14 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

15 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

16 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res17 idence to Sepandan Farnia and Farbod Farnia, the Sec18 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce

19 by 2, during the current or next following fiscal year, the

20 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

21 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

22 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli23 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made
3

•HR 848 IH

1 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth

2 under section 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED NOVEMBER 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-29-1997
<CASH>                                       1,096,107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  215,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,887,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,221,247
<PP&E>                                       2,908,859
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,923,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,216,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,220,020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,078
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,488,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,216,323
<SALES>                                     13,607,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,607,628
<CGS>                                       10,702,733
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,702,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,912,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,510
<INCOME-TAX>                                       357
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,153
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.001
        

</TABLE>
SCWC-20-0000050
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

S TATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. FRANCIS A. GRANDINETTI, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-20-0000050; CASE NO. 3PC930000141)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the document filed on June 3, 2020 by petitioner/defendant-appellant Francis A. Grandinetti entitled “Ten-Day Reconsideration and Certiorari:”, and the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, as to petitioner’s request for certiorari review, the application for writ of certiorari is rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 25, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-20-0000050 25-JUN-2020 08:17 AM
#### § 102-85.110 Can the allowance amount be changed?

The GSA schedule of allowances for new assignments is adjusted annually for design and construction cost changes. As the need arises, GSA may adjust an agency or bureau's TI allowance. GSA may also adjust a TI allowance for a specific project, if conditions warrant. This decision is solely GSA's. In addition, the customer agency may waive any part or all of its customization allowance in the case of a new space assignment. In the case of backfill space (also known as relet space), the customer agency can also waive any part or all of the tenant general allowance, if the customer agency will use the existing tenant improvements, with or without modifications.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16128]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-247-001]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Compliance 
Filing

June 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 13, 2000, Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
(CIG), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the substitute tariff sheets listed in Appendix A 
to the filing, to be effective June 1, 2000.
    CIG states that these tariff sheets are being filed in compliance 
with the order issued May 31, 2000 in Docket No. RP00-247.
    CIG states these tariff sheets reflect the change to reinstate the 
imbalance payback period that is currently available during the first 
week of the month following the transportation activities causing the 
imbalance.
    Any person desiring to protest the filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16128 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M