alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16377]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1106]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status, Clariant Corporation 
(Electronic Chemicals); Somerville, NJ

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for * * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 49, has made application to the Board for authority 
to establish special-purpose subzone at the electronic chemicals 
manufacturing and warehousing facilities of the Clariant Corporation, 
located in Somerville, New Jersey (FTZ Docket 42-99, filed 8/25/99);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (64 FR 48578, 9/7/99); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status at the electronic chemicals manufacturing and warehousing 
facilities of the Clariant Corporation, located in Somerville, New 
Jersey (Subzone 49I), at the location described in the application, and 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including 
Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of June 1999.
Troy H. Cribb,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:
Pierre V. Duy,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16377 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,184
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                   121
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               21,509
<PP&E>                                         1,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 26,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,700
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       54
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   26,269
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               66,184
<CGS>                                          62,005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  65,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                149
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (10)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            159
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .03


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

Nos. 19-1787

19-1900

MARK ANTHONY REID; ROBERT WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and 

others similarly situated; LEO FELIX CHARLES, on behalf of 

himself and others similarly situated,

Petitioners, Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

v.

CHRISTOPHER J. DONELAN, Sheriff, Franklin County, Massachusetts; 

LORI STREETER, Superintendent, Franklin County Jail & House of 

Correction; THOMAS M. HODGSON, Sheriff, Bristol County, 

Massachusetts; JOSEPH D. MCDONALD, JR., Sheriff, Plymouth 

County, Massachusetts; STEVEN W. TOMPKINS, Sheriff, Suffolk 

County, Massachusetts; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of the 

Department of Homeland Security; DENIS C. RIORDAN, Director, 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement Boston Field Office; MERRICK 

B. GARLAND, Attorney General; JEAN KING, Acting Director of the 

Executive Office for Immigration Review; EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR 

IMMIGRATION REVIEW; DAVID DUBOIS, Sheriff, Strafford County, New 

Hampshire; CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent, Strafford 

County House of Corrections; TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director, 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement,

Respondents, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on October 26, 2021 is 

amended as follows:

On page 5, line 22, "shall" is replaced with "should"
392PA13-3

#### State v. Robert T. Walston, Sr.

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay

1. Allowed 12/18/2015

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*
O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed by

the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Justin Michael

Winter , it is this 25th day of Ma y 2023, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that

, effective immediately, the Respondent, Justin Michael

Winter

, is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for violation

of Rule s 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5(a), 1.15(a) and (e), 3.3(a), 3.4(d), 4.1(a), 8.1(a) and (b), 8.4(a),

(b), (c) and (d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct ; and it is

further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Justin Michael

Winter from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees

of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial

tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19

- 761(b ).

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Justice ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

JUSTIN MICHAEL WINTER *

*

*

*

*

* IN THE

SUPREME COURT

OF MARYLAND

AG No. 1

September Term, 20 2 3
#### § 302-3.407 What is the effect on my TCS reimbursement if my assignment lasts less than 6 months?

Your agency may authorize a TCS only when a TCS is expected to last 6 months or more. If your assignment is cut short for reasons other than separation from Government service, you will be paid TCS expenses.
#### § 105-64.000 What is the purpose of this part?

This part implements the General Services Administration (GSA) rules under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, as amended. The rules cover the GSA systems of records from which information is retrieved by an individual's name or personal identifier. These rules set forth GSA's policies and procedures for accessing, reviewing, amending, and disclosing records covered by the Privacy Act. GSA will comply with all existing and future privacy laws.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 1, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-10284 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MALABA G. MULUMBA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-250-ALL-P

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Malaba G. Mulumba appeals his jury conviction and sentence

for making a false claim of United States citizenship in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 911. Mulumba does not appeal his jury

conviction for possession of a firearm by an illegal alien in

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(5) and 924(a)(2), and, thus,

this conviction is not affected by the disposition of this

appeal. 
No. 05-10284

-2-

Mulumba contends that the Government failed to prove beyond

a reasonable doubt that he represented himself to be a United

States citizen. Because Mulumba did not move for a judgment of

acquittal in the district court, this court’s review of the

sufficiency of the evidence “is limited to determining whether

there was a manifest miscarriage of justice, that is, whether the

record is devoid of evidence pointing to guilt.” United States

v. Delgado, 256 F.3d 264, 274 (5th Cir. 2001) (internal quotation

marks and citation omitted).

A conviction for making a false claim of United States

citizenship requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the

defendant “falsely and willfully represent[ed] himself to be a

citizen of the United States.” 18 U.S.C. § 911. The sole

evidence presented by the Government to establish a violation of

18 U.S.C. § 911 was an I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification

Form wherein Mulumba checked a box certifying that he was “[a]

citizen or national of the United States.” (emphasis added). 

Because 18 U.S.C. § 911 criminalizes only false representations

of United States citizenship and a person can be a national of

the United States and yet not a citizen, the record is devoid of

evidence that Mulumba falsely represented himself to be a citizen

of the United States. Therefore, Mulumba’s conviction under 18

U.S.C. § 911 is REVERSED. Further, because Mulumba’s 18 U.S.C. 

§ 911 conviction affected the sentence imposed in connection with

his 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5) conviction, his sentence is VACATED and
No. 05-10284

-3-

the case is REMANDED for resentencing on the remaining count of

conviction.

18 U.S.C. § 911 CONVICTION REVERSED; SENTENCE VACATED;

REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING ON THE REMAINING COUNT OF

CONVICTION
Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment Costs:

Equipment Shipping Costs

This attachment to the supplement cost document provides EPA's communication with a vendor 

regarding dry cargo van shipping costs for chemical precipitation treatment equipment used in 

the Steam Electric cost model.
Project No.: 0172.08.029.044 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam/Cost/Compliance Modeling

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

 Outgoing Call

Date: 06/28/2011 Time: 8:15 am EST

Company Name: FreightCenter.com

 

Contact Name: Robert Clark

Phone No.: (800) 716-7608 ext. 1110

Email address: RClark@freightcenter.com

Name: Kavya Kasturi ERG

GENERAL SUBJECT: Vendor cost request for chemical freight costs – dry van truck

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On June 28, 2011 at 8:15 am I contacted Mr. Robert Clark. I explained to Mr. Clark that we are 

working on conceptual level costing of a chemical precipitation wastewater treatment system to 

treat FGD (flue gas desulfurization) wastewater from steam electric power plants, and as a part 

of this project we are trying to collect cost information on different components or units of a 

chemical precipitation system. Chemicals are required for the treatment system and we are 

seeking cost information for chemical shipping.

I spoke to Mr. Clark about the chemicals that would require shipping for a chemical precipitation 

system. Mr. Clark indicated that costs would vary depending on a number of factors, including

whether a full truckload or partial truckload would be required. Mr. Clark stated that the freight 

cost does not differ depending on whether the chemicals shipped are liquid or solid. The 

chemicals could be shipped via totes or bags per pallet. A typical pallet is 4 feet by 40 inches and 

cannot be stacked more than 8 feet high.

Mr. Clark stated that a standard dry van truck could be either 48 or 52-53 feet long, 8 feet wide, 

and 9 feet high and could carry up to 45,000 lbs of material. A dry van truck can hold up to 30 

pallets. Mr. Clark stated the approximate cost for shipping a full dry van truckload approximately 

500 miles would be $1,400.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of approved Tribal-State Compact. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish, in the                         **Federal Register**                        , notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved the Tribal-State Compact for Class III Gaming Between the Samish Indian Nation and the State of Washington, which was executed on April 18, 2000.                     

# DATES:

This action is effective June 21, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066. 

Dated: June 9, 2000.

Kevin Gover,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 00-15563 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of the undersigned registrant (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: January 15, 2010  American International Ventures, Inc.  /s/ Myron Goldstein Myron Goldstein Chief Financial Officer  /s/ Steven Davis Steven Davis Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Experimental and Integrative 
Activities; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Experimental & Integrative 
Activities (1193).
    Date and Time: June 29, 2000, 8 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: Room 130, National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Blvd. 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Anthony Maddox, CISE Educational Innovation, 
Experimental and Integrative Activities, Room 1160, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, VA 22230 Telephone: (703) 306-
1981.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation 
for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate CISE Educational Innovation 
proposals submitted in response to the program announcement (NSF 00-
33).
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: June 19, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15833 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
28 January 2016

404P15

#### Prince Jerry Jones v. Harnett County District Court Jacqualyn L. Lee

Pit’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Denied
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGARDINGPERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Warren Mobley.,the Chief Executive Officer of Moscow CableCom Corp. (the "Company"),in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of myknowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedNovember 30, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the Securities andExchange Commission:

- Fully complies with the requirements of     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report     fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and     results of operations of the Company.

/s/             Warren Mobley Name:    Warren MobleyTitle:       President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer               (Principal Executive Officer)Date:       January 18, 2005
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

J. M. D., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3130

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed October 5, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Robert Bauman, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and 

Laurie Benoit-Knox, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit
      32.1











**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the
      “ Operating
      Partnership ”)
      hereby
      certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
      accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Operating Partnership for the
      year ended December 31, 2006 (the “ Report ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating
      Partnership.





Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.





Date:
                February 27, 2007
            /s/
              Stanley K. TangerStanley
                K. Tanger
              Chief
                Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust, Sole General Partner of the
                Registrant
#### § 105-50.303 Cost basis in lieu of fees.

Where the cost of services is to be recovered on other than a fee basis, upon receipt of a request from a State or local government for such services, a written reply shall be prepared by the service or staff office receiving the request stating the basis for reimbursement for the services to be performed. The proposal shall be based on an estimate of all direct costs, such as salaries of personnel involved plus personnel benefits, travel, and other related expenses and on such indirect costs as management, supervisory, and staff support expenses. An appropriate surcharge may be developed to recover these indirect costs. The terms thereof shall be concurred in by the Director of Administration. Acceptance in writing by the requester shall constitute a binding agreement between GSA and the requesting governmental unit.
No. 10-1359.

#### Moylan *v.*Territory of Guam et al.

Sup. Ct. Guam. Certiorari denied.
436P15

#### State v. Tony Eugene Howell

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court of Alexander County

1. Dismissed

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed