alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 913.1 Subpoena authority. ( a ) General. The General Counsel by delegation from the Postmaster General is responsible for the issuance of subpoenas in investigations conducted under 39 U.S.C. 3005(a), with authority to delegate that function to a Deputy General Counsel.
( b ) Production of records. A subpoena issued by the General Counsel may require the production of any records (including computer records, books, papers, documents, and other tangible things which constitute or contain evidence) which the General Counsel considers relevant or material to an investigation.
( c ) Requirements. No subpoena shall be issued until a specific case (identifying the individual or entity that is the subject) has been opened and an appropriate supervisory and legal review of a subpoena request have been performed.
( d ) Requests for subpoenas. ( 1 ) A request for a subpoena shall be submitted to the Office of the General Counsel by a Postal Inspector, Inspector Attorney, or other Inspector specifically authorized by the Postal Inspection Service to submit such a request, after appropriate review by an Inspector In Charge or that person's designee.
( 2 ) A request for a subpoena shall state the specific case, with an individual or entity identified as the subject, in which the subpoena is requested.
( 3 ) A request for a subpoena shall contain a specific description of the records requested, and shall state how they are relevant or material to the investigation.
( 4 ) The General Counsel, in his or her discretion, may issue or deny the requested subpoena, or require the requesting individual to provide additional information. The General Counsel, in his or her discretion, may also honor requests to amend or supplement a request for a subpoena.
( e ) Form and issuance. Every subpoena shall cite 39 U.S.C. 3016 as the authority under which it is issued, and shall command each person to whom it is directed to produce specified records at a time and place therein specified. The General Counsel shall sign the subpoena and enter the name of the individual or entity to whom it is directed.
EXHIBIT 23.2



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No 33-21735 and No. 33-350293) of KSW, Inc. of our
report dated February 11, 2005, except for Note 16, as to which the date is
March 28, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements which are
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





MARDEN, HARRISON & KREUTER
Certified Public Accounts, P.C.


White Plains, New York
March 29, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-22846-DPG

VICTOR ARIZA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

TANDY LEATHER COMPANY, INC.

Defendant.

__________________________/

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiff Victor Ariza and Defendant 

Tandy Leather Company, Inc. hereby stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of this action, with 

each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Dated: November 14, 2022

Respectfully submitted,

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A

4800 North Hiatus Road

Sunrise, FL 33351-7919

Telephone: 954.362.3800

Facsimile: 954.362.3779

s/ Roderick Hannah

Roderick V. Hannah, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 435384

rhannah@rhaannahlaw.com 

Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A

4640 N.W. 7th Street

Miami, Florida 33126-2309

Telephone: 305.266-9780

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK

& STEWART, P.C.

9130 S. Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1625 

Miami, FL 33156

Telephone: 305.374.0506

Facsimile: 305.374.0456

s/ Paul De Boe 

Paul J. De Boe, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 52051

paul.deboe@ogletreedeakins.com

Counsel for Defendant

Case 1:22-cv-22846-DPG Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2022 Page 1 of 2
53382989.v1-OGLETREE 2

Facsimile: 305.269.8311

s/ Pelayo Duran

Pelayo M. Duran, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 0146595

pduran@pelayodural.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff

 

Case 1:22-cv-22846-DPG Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2022 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Jennifer Dawson, Chief
Financial Officer of Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Annual Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:    | /s/ Jennifer Dawson    
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Jennifer Dawson        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | March 29, 2012         



This written statement is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of
this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this
Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### § 301-51.4 Who in my agency has the authority to grant exemptions from the mandatory use of the Government contractor-issued travel charge card?

The head of your agency or their designee(s) has (have) the authority to grant exemptions from the mandatory use of the Government contractor-issued travel charge card.

[FTR Amdt. 90, 65 FR 3055, Jan. 19, 1998. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2016-01, 81 FR 63138, Sept. 14, 2016] FTR Amdt. 90, 65 FR 3055, Jan. 19, 1998; FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12252, Feb. 16, 2024]
§ 105-57.006 Wage garnishment order. ( a ) Unless GSA receives information it believes justifies a delay or cancellation of the withholding order, the Agency will send, by first class mail, overnight delivery service or hand delivery, a SF 329A (Letter to Employer & Important Notice to Employer), a SF 329B (Wage Garnishment Order), a SF 329C (Wage Garnishment Worksheet), and a SF 329D (Employer Certification), to the debtor's employer— ( 1 ) Within 30 days after the debtor fails to make a timely request for a hearing (i.e., within 15 business days after the mailing of the notice described in § 105-57.004(a) of this part); or
( 2 ) If a timely request for a hearing is made by the debtor, within 30 days after a final decision is made by the hearing official to proceed with garnishment.
( b ) The withholding order sent to the employer under paragraph (a) of this section will contain the signature of, or the image of the signature of, the Administrator or his or her delegate. The order will contain only the information necessary for the employer to comply with the withholding order. Such information includes the debtor's name, address, and social security number, as well as instructions for withholding and information as to where payments are to be sent.
( c ) GSA will retain a copy of the evidence of service indicating the date of submission of the order. The evidence of service may be retained electronically so long as the manner of retention is sufficient for evidentiary purposes.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4242 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4242

 To enforce the law regulating the height of buildings in the District 
 of Columbia by prohibiting the District of Columbia from issuing any 
   building or occupancy permit for the project described in Zoning 
Commission Case 93-9C unless the project is modified to conform to such 
                                  law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 1994

 Mr. Stark (for himself and Mr. Bliley) introduced the following bill; 
    which was referred to the Committee on the District of Columbia

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To enforce the law regulating the height of buildings in the District 
 of Columbia by prohibiting the District of Columbia from issuing any 
   building or occupancy permit for the project described in Zoning 
Commission Case 93-9C unless the project is modified to conform to such 
                                  law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FROM ISSUING BUILDING OR 
              OCCUPANCY PERMIT.

    The District of Columbia may not issue any building or occupancy 
permit for the project described in Zoning Commission Case 93-9C, as 
approved by the Zoning Commission for the District of Columbia on April 
11, 1994, unless the project is modified so that--
            (1) in the building proposed to be constructed under the 
        project, any space above a studio that is used primarily to 
        house servicing equipment for the studio is not more than 110 
        feet above the applicable measuring point; and
            (2) any penthouse on the building proposed to be 
        constructed under the project is set back from the building's 
        exterior or bounding walls by a distance at least equal to the 
        penthouse's height.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-

14(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Analogic Corporation (the
Company) for the quarter ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John J. Millerick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 11, 2006



| |  |                              
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | /s/ John J. Millerick        
| |  | John J. Millerick            
| |  | Chief Financial Officer      
| |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
RODNEY E. CALLAHAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

GOVERNOR RICK SCOTT, ET 

AL.,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1044

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 6, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

George S. Reynolds, III, Judge.

Rodney E. Callahan, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, 

Tallahassee, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., THOMAS and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45583-45584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18516]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

First Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 232, Airborne Selective 
Calling Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting notice of RTCA Special Committee 232, Airborne 
Selective Calling Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
first meeting of RTCA Special Committee 232, Airborne Selective Calling 
Equipment.

[[Page 45584]]

DATES: The meeting will be held September 3-5, from 9 a.m.-12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th 
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You may contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone 
at (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site http://www.rtca.org for directions.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 216.

September 3-5

 Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
 Agenda Overview.
 RTCA Overview.
    [cir] Background on RTCA, MOPS, and Process.
 Review of Selective Calling (SELCAL) Code Pool Expansion.
 SC-232 Scope and Terms of Reference.
 SC-232 Structure and Organization of Work.
 Other Business.
 Date and Place of Next Meetings.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 28, 2014.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-18516 Filed 8-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
297P15

#### State v. Terrance Javarr Ross

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Slay (COA15-87)

1. Allowed 08/21/2015

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Allowed

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Allowed
# Comments on: 23-143: In Re META PLATFORMS, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 32 AND 33 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,856
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      272
<ALLOWANCES>                                       176
<INVENTORY>                                         34
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,245
<PP&E>                                           1,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,602
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,831)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,916
<SALES>                                          1,827
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,827
<CGS>                                              786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (119)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,159)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,159)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,159)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.95)


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ARVIN SAENZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-11-00341-CR 

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20080C11300) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2013.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
#### SAMMY R. PRUETT, Plaintiff v. JOEL D. BINGHAM and JEAN’S BUS SERVICE, INC., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs v. GREGORY ALAN WIGGINS, MATTHEW BRACKETT, and MOUNTAIN HOME FIRE *&*RESCUE DEPARTMENT, INC., Third-Party Defendants

No. 34A15

Filed 18 March 2016

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,_N.C. App._, 767 S.E.2d 357 (2014), affirming an order entered on 17 October 2013, as amended by an order entered on 23 January 2014, both by Judge Hugh B. Lewis in Superior Court, Rutherford County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 17 February 2016.

*Davis & Hamrick, LLP, by Ann C. Rowe and H. Lee Davis, Jr., for defendants and third-party plaintiff-appellants.*

*Michael E. Casterline; and Brazil & Burke, P.A., by Meghann K. Burke and W.O. Brazil, III, for third-party defendant-appellees Matthew Brackett and Mountain Home Fire & Rescue Department, Inc.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4191

To designate the United States Post Office located at 9630 Estate Thomas

in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ‘‘Aubrey C. Ottley United States

Post Office’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 13, 1994

Mr. DE LUGO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To designate the United States Post Office located at 9630

Estate Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the

‘‘Aubrey C. Ottley United States Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Post Office located at 9630 Estate

5 Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, shall be known

6 and designated as the ‘‘Aubrey C. Ottley United States

7 Post Office’’.
2

•HR 4191 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the post

4 office referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a ref5 erence to the ‘‘Aubrey C. Ottley United States Post

6 Office’’.

Æ
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20836 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEE HOFFMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR H 96-39-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lee Hoffman appeals her guilty-plea conviction for aiding and abetting and mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1341, on the grounds that there was an inadequate factual basis for her plea. The guilty plea Hoffman entered into with the Government contained a waiver-of-appeal provision whereby Hoffman waived her right to appeal her conviction or sentence except asNo. 96-20836 - 2 - to any upward departure. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and conclude that the waiver was informed and voluntary and is therefore binding on Hoffman. Her appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Form LLC-5.5 Illinois

Limited Liability Company Act

Articles of Organization FILE #

Secretary of State Jesse White

Department of Business Services

Limited Liability Division

www.cyberdriveillinois.com

1. Limited Liability Company Name:

Address of Principal Place of Business where records of the company will be kept:

Articles of Organization effective on the filing date.

Registered Agent’s Name and Registered Office Address:

Purpose for which the Limited Liability Company is organized:

“The transaction of any or all lawful business for which Limited Liability Companies may be organized under this Act.”

The LLC is to have perpetual existence.

The Limited Liability Company

I affirm, under penalties of perjury, having authority to sign hereto, that these Articles of Organization are to the best

of my knowledge and belief, true, correct and complete.

Dated:

Name and Address of Organizer

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Filing Fee:

Expedited Fee:

Approved By:

$500

$100

This document was generated electronically at www.cyberdriveillinois.com

FILED

Jesse White

Secretary of State

1506 6TH AVE WILKENS, ANDREW J WILKENS, RAINA N ANDREW J WILKENS 1506 6TH AVE POB 1126 STERLING, IL 61081 STERLING, IL 61081 is managed by the manager(s). STERLING, IL 61081-2544 05313449 1506 6TH AVE POB 1126 1506 6TH AVE 1506 6TH AVE ANDREW J WILKENSUNEEK PERSPECTIVE, LLC STERLING, IL 61081 STERLING, IL 61081 JUNE 15, 2015 TLB JUN 15 2015
No. 10-11084.

#### Leonard *v.*Federal Bureau of Investigation et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Proposed Tulare Basin

Wildlife Management Area

Final Environmental Assessment, 

Land Protection Plan, and 

Conceptual Management Plan

Pintail, Larry Eiffert, USFWS
San Joaquin River National Wildlife Refuge

San Luis NWR Complex

947-C West Pacheco Blvd.

Los Banos, CA 93635

Telephone: 209/826-3508

Fax: 209/826-1445

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

1 (800) 344-WILD

June 2007

Kern National Wildlife Refuge Complex

P.O. Box 670

Delano, CA 93216

661/725 2767

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

http://www.fws.gov

http://www.fws.gov/cno

For Refuge Information

1 800/344-WILD

November 2007