alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### C. R. BREWER *v.*ORRIN WOODWARD.

*Parol Evidence to explain Indorsement.*

Parol evidence is admissible to prove, when one, who is not a party to the note, although the owner, endorses his name in blank, that it was agreed that he was not to be liable unless the purchaser should return the note on his failure to collect it at maturity.

Jury trial at the April Term, 1881, Royce, J. presiding. Yerdict for defendant. The case appears in the opinion.

*II. S. Boyce,*for the plaintiff.

*G. P.*Hogan, for the defendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Taft, J.

This was an action of assumpsit to recover the amount due upon a promissory note. The note was payable to one Austin or bearer, and was owned by the defendant, who before its maturity, writing his name in blank upon the back thereof, sold it to the plaintiff. The County Court admitted evidence offered by the defendant to show that at the time of the endorsement and sale of the n'ote, that it was agreed between him and the plaintiff, that unless the latter collected the note at its maturity, he would return it to the defendant, and if.he did not, the defendant should be discharged from all liability thereon. The plaintiff insists that the admission of such evidence was error.

The law is well settled that the undertaking evidenced by such an endorsement, as between the parties to it, is susceptible of being controlled by oral evidence of the real obligation intended to be assumed at the time of signing. This has, as-.REDFIELD, Ch. J., says in *Sylvester, Exr.*v. *Downer,*20 Vt. 355, been so often declared by this court that it seems needless to refer to the decisions. *Barrows*v. *Lane*and another, 5 Vt. 161; *Flint*v. *Day,*9 Vt. 345 ; *Strong*v. *Riker,*16 Vt. 554.

The evidence was properly admitted, and the judgment of the County Court is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39868-39869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-401-401]


Certain Carbon Steel Products From Sweden: Extension of 
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit for preliminary results of 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 28, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tipten Troidl at (202) 482-1767 or 
Gayle Longest at (202) 482-3338, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement VI, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

Statutory Time Limits

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination 
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an 
order/finding for which a review is requested and a final determination 
within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary determination 
is published. However, if it is not practicable to complete the review 
within the time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 
Department to extend the time limit for the preliminary determination 
to a maximum of 365 days and for the final determination to 180 days 
(or 300 days if the Department does not extend the time limit for the 
preliminary determination) from the Date of publication of the 
preliminary determination.

Background

    On December 3, 1999, the Department published a notice of 
initiation of administrative review of the countervailing duty on 
certain carbon steel products from Sweden, covering the period January 
1, 1998 through December 31, 1998 (64 FR 56485). The preliminary 
results are currently due no later than July 2, 2000.

Extension of Preliminary Results of Review

    We determine that it is not practicable to complete the preliminary 
results of this review within the original time limit. Therefore, the 
Department is extending the time limits for completion

[[Page 39869]]

of the preliminary results until no later than October 31, 2000. See 
Decision Memorandum from Melissa G. Skinner, Office Director for AD/CVD 
Office VI, to Holly A. Kuga, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, dated 
June 21, 2000, which is on public file in the Central Records Unit, 
Room B-099 of the Department of Commerce. We intend to issue the final 
results no later than 120 days after the publication of the preliminary 
results.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Act.

    Dated: June 22, 2000.
Holly A. Kuga,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-16380 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#22.2

To all Commercial Unitary Air Conditioners and Heat Pump stakeholders:

As a follow-on to the e-mail sent earlier this week, the Department of Energy is writing to

inform you that the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) for the commercial

unitary air conditioners and heat pumps energy conservation standards rulemaking is now

available for your review at the following website: 

http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/ac_hp.html

Stakeholder participation and comment on this document is an integral part of the rulemaking

process. Stakeholders are invited to provide comment on all the methodologies, inputs, and

assumptions presented in the Department's ANOPR analysis. In order to present and clarify the

ANOPR material published today, the Department is organizing two events. Both are open to

the public, and we invite you to inform other stakeholders who may be interested in these events. 

1. Live Internet "webcast" on the rulemaking process and spreadsheet tools, 1:00-4:00

p.m. EDT, August 12, 2004; and

2. Public Meeting on ANOPR at the Department of Energy in Washington, DC, 9:00

a.m.-5:00 p.m., September 30, 2004

At the public meeting, all statements will be recorded and transcribed, and will become part of

the official record of the standards rulemaking. A draft of the public meeting agenda is attached

to this email message.

If you would like to participate in the webcast, please contact Mr. James Raba at

jim.raba@ee.doe.gov or (202) 586-8654, no later than August 9, 2004. If you would like to

participate in the public meeting, please contact Ms Brenda Edwards-Jones at brenda.edwardsjones@ee.doe.gov or 202-586-2945. 

The deadline for submitting written comments on the ANOPR and TSD is November 12, 2004. 

You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or by courier. Wherever possible, comments

in the electronic format should carry the electronic signature of the author. Absent an electronic

signature, comments submitted electronically must be followed and authenticated by submitting

a signed original paper document. All comments (electronic and paper) should clearly identify

the Docket number: EE-RM/STD-00-550 and/or RIN 1904-AB08. 

E-mail: commercialairconditioner.anopr@ee.doe.gov

Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Building Technologies,

Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC, 20585-0121. 

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 22B
Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Building

Technologies, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC, 20585-0121. 

Telephone: 202-586-2945 

We appreciate your reviewing the materials and look forward to your participation in this event. 

James Raba

Project Manager

Building Technologies Program, EE-2J

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

U.S. Department of Energy

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 22B
No. 10-11251.

#### Curtiss *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.1







RESOLUTION OF THE SHAREHOLDERS







OF







PERKINS OIL & GAS INC.












The following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Majority of the Shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been waived, held this February 3rd, 2017;







WHEREAS there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to effectuate a new Board of Directors of the Company;







NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the majority of shareholders having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue and pursuant to NRS 78.320, have overwhelmingly decided and RESOLVED that we have elected:







SONNY ARANDIA







The Above qualified person has been nominated, and has accepted their position as DIRECTOR of the Company.







Said Motion is hereby passed and the corporate books, records and the Company shall file this Resolution in the corporate records.







 


Dated:  February 3rd, 2017

















/s/ Steven Wang                                                                             


Steven Wang,


on behalf of Regale Consultants Ltd., Majority Shareholders
April 27, 2012

No. 11-9886 (11A997).

#### In re Selsor.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Sotomayor, and by her referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-2717

___________

Jessie Hill *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Chris E. Williams, Circuit Judge, *

Malvern, AR; Phillip H. Shirron, Circuit* [UNPUBLISHED]

Judge, Grant County; John W. Cole, *

Judge; Dan Harmon, Former Prosecutor,*

Grant County; Harold King, Former *

Deputy Prosecutor, Grant County; *

Richard A. Garrett, Deputy Prosecuting *

Attorney, Grant County; Eddy R. *

Easley, Prosecuting Attorney, Grant *

County; Norman B. Frisby, Deputy *

Prosecuting Attorney, Grant County; *

Estate of Sherman Bell, Detective, *

Ouachita County; Bob Adams, Grant *

County; Norman Mark Klappenbach, *

Attorney, Fordyce, AR; Estate of Joe *

Kelly Hardin, Assistant Counsel; Does, *

Jurors/Alternate Jurors, Grant County *

Trial September 1995; Bob Frazier, *

Attorney, Malvern, AR; Crain, Attorney,*

Malvern, AR; Arkansas Attorney *

General, Office and Staff; City of *

Sheridan Arkansas, *

*

Appellees. *
-2-

___________

Submitted: October 6, 2011

Filed: October 12, 2011

___________

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jessie Hill appeals following the district court’s pre-service dismissal of his

civil complaint and moves for permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on

appeal. We grant IFP status. Further, after careful review of the record, we conclude

that remand is required, because it appears the district court failed to rule on a motion

to amend that Hill filed on February 17, 2011. Accordingly, we vacate the district

court’s order dismissing Hill’s complaint, and we remand for consideration of the

motion to amend. See Pure Country, Inc. v. Sigma Chi Fraternity, 312 F.3d 952 (8th

Cir. 2002). We also deny as moot Hill’s pending motion for injunctive relief.

______________________________
#### § 128-1.5002-8 Property custodian (PC).

An individual responsible for the immediate physical custody of all personal property under his control and for providing documentation as required on all actions affecting the personal property within his jurisdiction. The designation as PC may or may not correspond to the individual's official job title.
#### James S. Palmer v. Robert Vance et al., County Commissioners of Saline County.

Filed April 3, 1895.

No. 6272.

Highways: Location: Damages: Road Funds. . The damages sustained by the land-owner by reason of the location of a public highway cannot be paid out of the county road fund, but must be paid out of moneys in the road fund of the road district in which the laud taken lor the highway is situated. *Aclcerman v. Thummel,*40 Neb., 95, followed.

*349Error from the district court of Saline county. Tried below before Hastings, J.

*Palmer & Hendee,*for plaintiff in error.

Noryal, C. J.

A public road was located over lands belonging to the relator and his damages were allowed at $50. An appeal was taken to the district court, where he recovered the sum of $65 and costs taxed at $100.75. This action was brought against the respondents, as the county commissioners of Saline county, to compel them to draw a warrant in favor of the relator on the county road fund for the amount of said judgment and costs. A writ of *mandamus*was denied and the action dismissed.

A single question is presented for determination and that, is whether the respondents should have paid the judgment in controversy out of moneys in the county road fund. In *Ackerman v. Thummel,*40 Neb., 95, this court had under consideration the several statutory provisions relating to the location of highways and the payment of damages sustained by the land-owner by reason of the establishment of a public road, and it was there held that all such damages must be paid out of moneys in the road fund of the road district in which the land taken for highway purposes is situated, and that the county is not liable for the payment of such damages. The rule there announced is decisive of the case at bar, and that too against the contention of relator. The respondents having no authority to draw, a warrant on the county treasury in payment of the judgment, the district court did not err in refusing the writ of *mandamus'.*The judgment is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.2

American Greetings Corporation

Description of Compensation Payable to Non-Employee Directors

Effective as of July 1, 2009 (except with respect to the annual stock option grant, which is effective June 26, 2009), the non-employee directors of
American Greetings Corporation (American Greetings) shall receive the following compensation with respect to their service on the Board:



| |  |  | An annual board retainer fee of $70,000; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee to be paid an annual retainer fee of $10,000, the Chair of the Compensation and Management Development
Committee to be paid an annual retainer fee of $15,000, and the Chair of the Audit Committee to be paid an annual retainer fee of $20,000; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Non-chair members of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation and Management Development Committee to be paid an annual retainer fee of $7,500,
and non-chair members of the Audit Committee to be paid an annual retainer fee of $10,000; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Options to purchase 15,000 Class A common shares per fiscal year; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Reimbursement of expenses related to attending Board and committee meetings.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to the American Greetings Corporation 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, non-employee directors may make an election prior to the beginning of each fiscal year to receive American Greetings
Class A and/or Class B common shares in lieu of all or a portion of the fees due to such Director as compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. For purposes of determining the number of shares to be issued in lieu of such fees, the
shares are valued based on the closing price of the American greetings Class A common shares on the last trading day of the calendar quarter prior to the payment of such fees.
No. 11-140.

#### Strategic Impact Corp. et al. *v.*Big Dog Logistics, Inc., et al.

Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Geological Survey

# AGENCY:

Geological Survey, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA) negotiations. 

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating entering into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with Rio Algom Exploration to conduct aerial surveys in Alaska.

# INQUIRIES:

If any other parties are interested in studying other areas with the USGS, please contact: Fredric Wilson, USGS-Alaska Section, 4200 University Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508-4667.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is to meet the USGS requirement stipulated in the Survey Manual.

Dated: May 23, 2000.

Linda C. Gundersen,

Associate Chief Geologist for Program Operations.

[FR Doc. 00-15995  Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
#### § 302-11.22 May the 1-year time limitation be extended by my agency?

Yes, your agency may extend the 1-year limitation for up to one additional year for reasons beyond your control and acceptable to your agency.

[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18343, Apr. 1, 2011]
§ 128-1.5006-2 Property management officer (PMO). The property management officer of a bureau is responsible for coordinating and conducting the activities of the personal property management program and for performing the following functions: ( a ) Providing the required leadership, guidance, and operating procedures for personal property management functions.
( b ) Ensuring general ledger control accounts for personal property are supported by property records in accordance with DOJ Order 2110.1, Paragraph 6.103b(4).
( c ) Ensuring bureau compliance with the personal property management requirements of the FPMR and JPMR.
( d ) Designating items of controlled personal property within the bureau.
( e ) Ensuring records of controlled personal property are created and maintained by personnel other than property custodians.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BRIAN M. THOMPSON,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 322 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
#### § 109-38.000-50 Policy.

Motor vehicles and watercraft shall be acquired, maintained, and utilized in support of DOE programs in the minimum quantity required and in the most efficient manner consistent with program requirements, safety considerations, fuel economy, and applicable laws and regulations.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF VICTOR

SANGIULIANO

PETITION OF: DEBRA A. SLACK :

:

:

:

: No. 681 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of March, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### § 302-16.3 Who is and is not eligible for a MEA?

See the following table for eligibility of MEA:

| Employees eligible for MEA | Employees not eligible for MEA |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Your agency authorized/approved a relocation or a TCS; and | (a) A new appointee. |
| (b) You discontinued and established a residence in connection with your relocation or TCS; and | (b) Authorized SES “last move home” benefits, |
| (c) You meet the applicable eligibility conditions in part 302-1 of this chapter; and | (c) Assigned under the Government Employees Training Act (5 U.S.C. 4109), or |
| (d) You signed the required service agreement in part 302-1 of this chapter | (d) Returning from an overseas assignment for separation from Government service. |
#### § 302-8.106 May I change from temporary to extended storage?

Yes, you may change from temporary to extended storage, if authorized by your agency.
No. 10-11226.

#### Winn *v.*Phelps, Warden, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4193

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received; read twice an referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

OCTOBER 8 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Committee discharged

AN ACT

To designate the building located at 100 Vester Gade, in

Cruz Bay, Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, for the period

of time during which it houses operations of the United

States Postal Service, as the ‘‘Ubaldina Simmons Post

Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4193 CDS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The building located at 100 Vester Gade, in Cruz

3 Bay, Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, shall, for the period

4 of time during which it houses operations of the United

5 States Postal Service, be known and designated as the

6 ‘‘Ubaldina Simmons Post Office’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

10 referred to in section 1 shall, with respect to the period

11 referred to in section 1, be deemed to be a reference to

12 the Ubaldina Simmons Post Office.

Passed the House of Representatives September 19,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.