alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anacomp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Linster W. Fox, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002
("Section 906"), that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or Section
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August  __, 2004

                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Linster W. Fox
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Anacomp, Inc. and will be retained
by Anacomp,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–574

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT

RESOLUTION 94, THE TAX LIMITATION CONSTITUTIONAL

AMENDMENT

APRIL 11, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 471]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 471, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of House Joint Resolution 94, the Tax Limitation Constitutional Amendment, under a

modified closed rule. The rule provides two hours of debate in the

House divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

The resolution provides for consideration of an amendment printed in the Congressional Record if offered by the Minority Leader

or his designee, which shall be considered as read and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by

the proponent and an opponent. Finally, the rule provides for one

motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 646 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 646

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide that motor carriers 
safety permits for the transportation of hazardous material be subject 
                           to annual renewal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1999

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide that motor carriers 
safety permits for the transportation of hazardous material be subject 
                           to annual renewal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 5109 of 
title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c) by inserting ``annual'' before 
        ``application with'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(2) by striking ``duration, terms,'' 
        and inserting ``terms'';
            (3) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i); and
            (4) by inserting after subsection (g) the following:
    ``(h) Duration.--A safety permit issued under this section shall be 
effective for a period of 1 year.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 301-10.7 How should I route my travel?

You must travel to your destination by the usually traveled route unless your agency authorizes or approves a different route as officially necessary.
No. 11-8889.

#### Clark v. Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

I, Dominique Bellemare, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Incitations, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, if any, is made known to me by others
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions);

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

<PAGE>

6.  I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions, with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.



Date: March 17, 2003



Dominique M. Bellemare, Chief Executive Officer


 /s/ Dominique M. Bellemare
----------------------------------------------



Dominique Bellemare,  Chief Financial Officer


 /s/ Dominique M. Bellemare
----------------------------------------------
Utah Energy Code, 2000 International Energy

Conservation Code, is available at:

http://www.energycodes.gov/states/
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 608 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 608

   To require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to 
 conduct an audit of purchases of military clothing and related items 
during fiscal year 1998 by certain military installations of the Army, 
                   Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to 
 conduct an audit of purchases of military clothing and related items 
during fiscal year 1998 by certain military installations of the Army, 
                   Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUDIT OF PROCUREMENT OF MILITARY CLOTHING AND CLOTHING-
              RELATED ITEMS BY CERTAIN MILITARY INSTALLATIONS.

    (a) Audit Requirement.--The Inspector General of the Department of 
Defense shall perform an audit of purchases of military clothing and 
clothing-related items in excess of the micro-purchase threshold during 
fiscal year 1998 by certain military installations to determine the 
extent to which such installations procured military clothing and 
clothing-related items in violation of the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 
10a et seq.) and section 9005 of Public Law 102-396 (10 U.S.C. 2241 
note) during that fiscal year.
    (b) Installations To Be Audited.--The audit under subsection (a)--
            (1) shall include an audit of the procurement of military 
        clothing and clothing-related items by four military 
        installations of each of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine 
        Corps; and
            (2) shall be limited to military installations in the 
        United States or the possessions or Territories of the United 
        States.
    (c) Definition.--As used in subsection (a), the term ``micro-
purchase threshold'' has the meaning provided by 32(f) of the Office of 
Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 428(f)).
    (d) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2000, the Inspector 
General of the Department of Defense shall submit to Congress a report 
on the results of the audit performed under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 0.403 Office hours.

The main offices of the Commission are open from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays, unless otherwise stated.

[52 FR 10228, Mar. 31, 1987]
§ 301-10.111 Are there any exceptions to the use of a contract City Pair Program fare? Yes, your agency may authorize use of a non-contract fare when: ( a ) There are no accommodations available on any scheduled contract City Pair Program flight arriving to your destination in time to accomplish the purpose of your travel or use of contract service would require you to incur unnecessary overnight lodging costs which would increase the total cost of the trip;
( b ) The contractor's flight schedule is inconsistent with explicit policies of your Federal department or agency with regard to scheduling travel during normal working hours;
( c ) A non-contract carrier offers a lower fare to the general public that, if used, will result in a lower total trip cost to the Government (the combined costs of transportation, lodging, meals, and related expenses considered); or Note 1 to paragraph ( c
):
This exception does not apply if the contract carrier offers the same or lower fare and has seats available at that fare, or if the fare offered by the non-contract carrier is restricted to Government and military travelers performing official business and may be purchased only with a contractor-issued charge card, centrally billed account (*e.g.,* YDG, MDG, QDG, VDG, and similar fares) or GTR where the two previous options are not available.
( d ) Cost effective rail transportation is available and is consistent with mission requirements.
Note 2 to § 301-10.111 :
A group of 10 or more passengers traveling together on the same day, on the same flight, for the same mission, requiring group integrity and identified as a group by the travel management service upon booking is not a mandatory user of the Government's contract City Pair Program fares. For group travel, agencies are expected to obtain air passenger transportation service that is practical and cost effective to the Government.
Note 3 to § 301-10.111 :
Contractors are not authorized to use contract City Pair Program fares to perform travel under their contracts.
Note 4 to § 301-10.111 :
Carrier preference is not a valid exception for using a non-contract City Pair Program fare.
[FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55704, Sept. 12, 2022]
No. 10-11071.

#### O’Neal *v.*Province, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Page 1 of 1Docket IndexEPA-R10-OAR-2010-0433DOC #DATEFROMTOSUBJECT1 10/5/2010 Chris Hall, EPA Claudia Vaupel, EPA Memorandum: Eagle River PM10 Attainment Determination2 5/24/1995 Jon W. Schweiss, EPA Garry Guay, ADEC Letterregarding review of special event status request3 9/1994 Guideline on the Identification and Handling of Ambient Air QualityData Affected by Special Events or Special Conditions (EPA-454/D94-001)4 6/1987 PM10SIP Development Guideline (EPA-450/2-86-001)5 4/1987 Guideline on Exceptions toData Requirements for DeterminingAttainment of Particulate Matter Standards (EPA-450 4-87 -005)6 5/1/1995 Steve Morris, Anchorage AirPollution Control AgencyChristy Lee, EPA PM-10 Data Capture Gap7 10/5/2010 Air Quality System, Raw Data Report, Eagle River PM108 10/6/2010 Claudia Vaupel, EPA Docket EPA-R10-OAR2010-0433Note to File on Monitoring Site Name9 11/9/2009 Mahbubul Islam, EPA BarbaraTrost Letter regarding approval ofthe Alaska 2009 monitoring network10 10/7/2010 Dennis J. McLerran Signed FederalRegister Direct Final Rule, Proposed Rule
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 12, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), The ATM Forum has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Cerent Corporation, Petaluma, CA; Harris Corporation, Melbourne, FL; Tdsoft Communications Ltdl, Herzeliya, ISRAEL; and Adaptive Broadband Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA have been added as parties to this venture. The following member has changed its name: GTE Government Systems to General Dynamics Communication Systems, Needham Heights, MA.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and The ATM Forum intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 19, 1993, The ATM Forum filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 2, 1993 (58 FR 31415).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 14, 1999. A notice has not yet been published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-16002  Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
No. 11-7.

#### Leyse *v.*Bank of America, N. A.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9026.

#### Branson *v.*City of Los Angeles, California, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 10-10970.

#### Sanders *v.*Vare, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Attorney General of Texas

KEN PAXTON

March 25, 2015 RECEIVED FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS Christopher A. Prine Clerk 

### 1st Court of Appeals 301 Fannin Street MAR 2 7 2015

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK 'V*7 Houston, Texas 77002-2066

Re- Revnaldo Amava 01-09-00848CR

Dear Mr. Prine^


### This letter is to request the above referenced appeal files. In order to adequately respond to the above petitioners' complaints, I need the entire 

### appellate files in each cause, including, but not limited to, the following1. Statement offsets for the trial, pre-trial and post-trial hearing^


### 2. Transcripts (trial court);
3. Appellate briefs, appellant's and appellee's initial and responsive
or supplementary;


### 4. Opinion(s) of the 1st Court of Appeals;
5. Motion rehearing, if any, and responsive pleadings thereto, if any;
6. Petition for Discretionary Review;


### 7. Briefs filed in connection with Petition for Discretionary Review; and


### 8. Opinions or orders of the Court of Criminal Appeals issued Response to the Petition for Discretionary Review.

Post Office Box 12548, Austin, Texas 78711-2548 tel: (512)463-2100 mtw.oag.stati-.tx.csChristopher A. Pine, Clerk 

### 1st Court of Appeals Page Two



### These records are needed and therefore you may send them to my attention at the address listed below. If you should have any questions, feel free to call (512) 4752074.
Thank you for your kind assistance in this matter. Sincerely.

Khristel L.^Samarripa Administrative Assistant II Office of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division 

### William P. Clements Bldg.

- 8th Floor 300 W. 15,h Street Austin. TX 78701POSTOFFICEBOX12518AUSTINTEXAS78711-2548ReturnSenilisRequestedOFFICIALBUSINESSSTATEOFTEXASPENALTYFORPRIVATEUSEneopost"BSika$000.482CHRISTOPHERA PRINE CLERK1STCOURTOFAPPEALS301FANNINSTREETHOUSTON TEXAS770022066ffiSEWft;RECEIVEDnJFIRSTCOURTOFAPPEAISIHOUSTON,TEXASMAR2 72015CHRISTOPHER A PRINECLERK"vr?^77002K£2SOB&CDiB"1lUiiii|ii'ii)'iiiiiliMl"H,1ili,i,i"iilb,ii|i"'THif?
AFS-14-078-E January 30, 2014 Exemption No. 5400K Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-10676

Mr. Donald Dillman Director of Operations

Airlines for America 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004

Dear Mr. Dillman:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 5440, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the

conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated December 13, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Airlines for America (A4A ) for an extension of Exemption No. 5004, as amended. That exemption from part 121, Appendix H, Level C Training and Checking Permitted, subparagraphs 2b, 3b, and 3c allows member airlines of A4A to use Level C simulators for pilot in command (PIC) initial and upgrade training and checking and reduces the upgrade/transition pilot experience requirements of part 121, Appendix H.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to A4A.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 5400, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest.2

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, Airlines for America is granted an extension to its exemption from part 121, Appendix H, Level C Training and Checking Permitted, subparagraphs 2b, 3b, and 3c that allows member airlines of A4A to use Level C simulators for pilot in command (PIC) initial and upgrade training and checking and reduces the upgrade/transition pilot experience requirements of part 121, Appendix H, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Upgrade training and the certification check required by § 61.157, when the pilot—

a. Has previously qualified as second in command (SIC) in the type airplane to which the pilot is upgrading; and

b. Is currently serving as SIC with that operator in an airplane in the same group as the type airplane to which the pilot is upgrading.

2. Initial training and certification check required by § 61.157, when the pilot—

a. Is employed by an airplane operator;

b. Is currently serving as SIC with that operator in an airplane of the same group;

and

c. Has a minimum of 500 flight-hours as SIC in airplanes of the same group with that operator.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 5400, as amended, to January 31, 2016 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovich Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
Second Amendment
                                to the
       AMP Incorporated Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors


     Pursuant to an action taken by the Board of Directors of AMP Incorporated
on July 22, 1997, the AMP Incorporated Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors,
as amended effective as of October 23, 1996 by the First Amendment to the AMP
Incorporated Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors (the "Plan"), is further
amended effective as of July 22, 1997 in the following respect:

     1.   Section 7(a)(iii) of the Plan is amended to delete the term "50%" in
          subpart (A) thereof and to substitute the term "66 2/3%" in lieu
          thereof.

     Except as provided above, all terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan
shall remain in full force and effect and without any further change or
modification whatsoever.

Executed this 25th day of September, 1997.

                                        AMP Incorporated
                                        
   Attest:___________________      By:  _________________________
          Corporate Secretary              J. E. Marley
                                           Chairman