alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        C.F.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(B) AND 15D-14(B)


     In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q for the period ending March 3, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to  Exchange  Act Rules 13a-14(b) and
15d-14(b)  and  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350  (as  adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002)  that  he  is  the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company  and  that:  (1)  the  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the  periods  covered  in  the  Report.

/s/ Paul R. Cook
--------------------------------
Paul R. Cook
Executive Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  April 16, 2007
§ 109-38.5102 Utilization controls and practices. Controls and practices to be used by DOE organizations and designated contractors for achieving maximum economical utilization of motor equipment shall include, but not be limited to: ( a ) The maximum use of motor equipment pools, taxicabs, shuttle buses, or other common service arrangements;
( b ) The minimum, practicable assignment of motor equipment to individuals, groups, or specific organizational components;
( c ) The maintenance of individual motor equipment use records, such as trip tickets or vehicle logs, or hours of use, as appropriate, showing sufficiently detailed information to evaluate appropriateness of assignment and adequacy of use being made. If one-time use of a motor vehicle is involved, such as assignments from motor pools, the individual's trip records must, as a minimum, identify the motor vehicle and show the name of the operator, dates, destination, time of departure and return, and mileage;
( d ) The rotation of motor vehicles between high and low mileage assignments where practicable to maintain the fleet in the best overall replacement age and mileage balance and operating economy;
( e ) The charging, if considered feasible, to the user organization for the cost of operating and maintaining motor vehicles assigned to groups or organizational components. These charge-back costs should include all direct and indirect costs of the motor vehicle fleet operation as determined by the field organization and contractor finance and accounting functions;
( f ) The use of dual-purpose motor vehicles capable of hauling both personnel and light cargo whenever appropriate to avoid the need for two motor vehicles when one can serve both purposes. However, truck-type or van vehicles shall not be acquired for passenger use merely to avoid statutory limitations on the number of passenger motor vehicles which may be acquired;
( g ) The use of motor scooters and motorcycles in place of higher cost motor vehicles for certain applications within plant areas, such as mail and messenger service and small parts and tool delivery. Their advantage, however, should be weighed carefully from the standpoint of overall economy (comparison with cost for other types of motor vehicles) and increased safety hazards, particularly when mingled with other motor vehicle traffic; and
( h ) The use of electric vehicles for certain applications. The use of these vehicles is encouraged wherever it is feasible to use them to further the goal of fuel conservation.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6534
TERRY E. COOK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ELLEN BLAIR, Dr., Defendant - Appellee, and ARTHUR F. BEELER; MEDICAL STAFF, FMC Butner, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-609-5-BO) Submitted: August 5, 2003 Decided: November 20, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry E. Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Terry E. Cook appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeCook v. Blair , No. CA-02-609-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2006 (the Report), I, Robert Essner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 9, 2006

By: /s/

Robert EssnerRobert EssnerChairman and Chief Executive Officer
# AGENCY:

 Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Interior.

# ACTION:

 Notice of Intent for Planning Analyses.

# SUMMARY:

 The Jackson Field Office, Eastern States, will prepare Planning Analyses (PA) for consideration of leasing six scattered tracts of Federal mineral estate for oil and gas exploration and development. The PAs will be prepared in concert with Environmental Analyses (EA).

This notice is issued pursuant to Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1501.7 and Title 43 CFR 1610.2(c). The planning effort will follow the procedures set forth in 43 CFR Part 1600.

The public is invited to participate in this planning process, beginning with the identification of planning issues and criteria.

# DATES:

 Comments relating to the identification of planning issues and criteria will be accepted for thirty days from the date of this publication.

# ADDRESSES:

 Send comments to Bureau of Land Management, Jackson Field Office, 411 Briarwood Drive, Suite 404, Jackson, Mississippi 39206.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Quazi T. Islam, Physical Scientist, Jackson Field Office, (601) 977-5400.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 The BLM has responsibility to consider applications to lease Federal mineral estate for oil and gas exploration and development. An interdisciplinary team will be used in the preparation of the PA/EAs. Preliminary issues, subject to change as a result of public input, are (1) potential impacts of oil and gas exploration and development on the surface resources and (2) consideration of restrictions on lease rights to protect surface resources.

Due to the scattered nature of the six tracts proposed for leasing, a separate analysis will be prepared for each tract.

Tract locations, along with acreages, are listed below.

## Alabama, Tuscaloosa County, Huntsville Meridian

T 18 S, R 8 W, Section 7; T 18 S, R 9 W, Sections 11 and 12; 200.94 acres.

## Louisiana, Concordia Parish, 5th Principal Meridian

T 5 N, R 9 E, Sections 66 and 67; 112.80 acres.

## Mississippi, Lamar County, St. Stephens Meridian

T 2 N, R 16 W, Sections 11, 12, 13, and 14; 1,470.0 acres.

## Mississippi, Covington County, St. Stephens Meridian

T 8 N, R 14 W, Section 4; 40.0 acres.

## Mississippi, Covington County, St. Stephens Meridian

T 6 N, R 54 W, Sections 8 and 17; 70.0 acres.

## Virginia, Dickenson County

Tract No. 550G, Parcel A-3. 200.61 acres.

Due to the limited scope of this PA/EA process, public meetings are not scheduled.

Bruce E. Dawson,

Field Manager, Jackson Field Office.

[FR Doc. 00-1605 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-GS-M
EX-10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 
  





 
 October 27, 2016 

Imran Khan 
 Dear Imran, 

Snap Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to confirm the terms of your full-time exempt employment as Chief Strategy Officer on the
following terms: 
 You will receive an annual salary of $240,000, which will be paid bi-weekly, less applicable payroll deductions and tax
withholdings. 
 In addition, employees qualify for a range of benefits. The Company may change compensation and benefits at its discretion.

 The Company acknowledges that it has previously issued equity awards to you under the Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.
Nothing in this letter will amend or affect the terms of those previously granted awards. 
 In your work for the Company, we do not want
you to use or disclose any confidential, proprietary, or trade-secret information of any former employer or other person to whom you owe an obligation of confidentiality. Likewise, as an employee of the Company, you may learn about confidential,
proprietary, or trade-secret information related to the Company and its clients that you must not share with anyone outside the Company. 

As a Snap Inc. employee, you will be expected to follow Company policies and acknowledge in writing that you have read our Employee Handbook.
With the exception of the “employment at-will” policy discussed below, the Company may modify or eliminate its policies at its discretion. 

Your employment with the Company is at-will. This means that you may terminate your employment with the Company at any time and for any reason
simply by notifying us. Likewise, the Company may terminate your employment at any time and for any reason with no advance notice. Your employment at-will status can be modified only in a written agreement signed by you and the Chief Executive
Officer. 
 By signing this letter, you reaffirm the terms and conditions of the Confidential Information and Inventions Assignment
Agreement, which you signed when you joined the Company. 
 This letter (together with the agreements referenced) is the complete and
exclusive statement of all the terms and conditions of your employment with the Company, and supersedes any prior agreements or representations with regard to your employment. It is entered into without reliance on any promise or representation
other than those expressly contained in this letter, and (except for changes reserved to the Company’s discretion) cannot be modified or amended except in a writing signed by you and a duly authorized member of the Board. This letter is
governed by the laws of California without regard to its conflict-of-laws provisions. 
 Sincerely, 

/s/ Evan
Spiegel                                        
 
 Evan Spiegel, Chief Executive Officer 







 Accepted and agreed: 

/s/ Imran
Khan                                         
        
 Imran Khan 

October 27,
2016                                         
    
 Date
#### § 301-11.306 What expenses am I required to itemize under actual expense?

You must itemize all expenses, including meals, (each meal must be itemized separately) for which you will be reimbursed under actual expense. However, expenses that do not accrue daily (e.g., laundry, dry cleaning, etc.) may be averaged over the number of days your agency authorizes/approves actual expenses. Receipts are required for lodging, regardless of amount and any individual meal when the cost exceeds $75. Your agency may require receipts for other allowable per diem expenses, but it must inform you of this requirement in advance of travel. When your agency limits M&IE reimbursement to either the prescribed maximum M&IE rate for the locality concerned or a reduced M&IE rate, it may or may not require M&IE itemization at its discretion.

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15961, Apr. 1, 1998; 63 FR 35537, June 30, 1998]
#### § 128-1.5002 Definitions.
§ 300-80.9 What reports are required for a test program? ( a ) The Administrator of General Services must submit a copy of any test program approved or extended to Congress at least 30 days before the effective date of the authorized test program.
( b ) The agency authorized to conduct the test program must submit the following reports: ( 1 ) An annual report on the progress of the test, submitted to the General Services Administration, Office of Government-wide Policy, 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405. The Administrator or designee may terminate the test program approval for failure to comply with these reporting requirements; and
( 2 ) A final report on the results of the test program must be submitted to the General Services Administration, Office of Government-wide Policy, 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405, and to the appropriate committees of Congress within 3 months after completion of the program.
( c ) All reports must include quantitative or qualitative assessments, or both, clearly evaluating the results of the test program and enumerating benefits and costs.
[FTR Amdt. 83, 64 FR 28881, May 27, 1999. Redesignated and amended by FTR Amdt. 2007-04, 72 FR 51374, Sept. 7, 2007. Further redesignated and amended by FTR Amdt. 2010-03, 75 FR 58330, Sept. 24, 2010; 85 FR 39848, July 2, 2020]
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Dated:                November 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Jeffrey P. Baker    |
|----------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |   | Jeffrey                P. Baker        |
|                                   |   | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                   |   |                                   |
| Dated:                November 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/                David J. Steichen   |
|                                   |   | David                J. Steichen       |
|                                   |   | Chief                Financial Officer |
No. 11-9411.

#### Knight *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
H. R. 4193

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the building located at 100 Vester Gade, in Cruz Bay, Saint Thomas,

Virgin Islands, for the period of time during which it houses operations of the

United States Postal Service, as the ‘‘Ubaldina Simmons Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The building located at 100 Vester Gade, in Cruz Bay, Saint

Thomas, Virgin Islands, shall, for the period of time during which

it houses operations of the United States Postal Service, be known

and designated as the ‘‘Ubaldina Simmons Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the building referred to

in section 1 shall, with respect to the period referred to in section

1, be deemed to be a reference to the Ubaldina Simmons Post Office.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Comments on: 20-1411: RAO v. SMITH [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4190 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4190

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the building located at 41-42 Norre Gade in Saint Thomas, 
     Virgin Islands, for the period of time during which it houses 
 operations of the United States Postal Service, as the Alvaro de Lugo 
                              Post Office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building located at 41-42 Norre Gade in Saint Thomas, Virgin 
Islands, shall, for the period of time during which it houses 
operations of the United States Postal Service, be known and designated 
as the ``Alvaro de Lugo Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall, with respect to the period referred to in section 1, be deemed 
to be a reference to the Alvaro de Lugo Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 50-203.14 Decisions concerning exceptions and exemptions.

Decisions concerning exceptions and exemptions shall be in writing and approved by the Secretary of Labor or officer prescribed by him, originals being filed in the Department of Labor, and certified copies shall be transferred to the department or agency originating the request and to the Comptroller General. All such decisions shall be promulgated to all contracting agencies by the Office of Government Contracts Wage Standards, WSA of the Department of Labor.

[36 FR 289, Jan. 8, 1971]
#### § 301-10.305 How is reimbursement handled if another person(s) travels in a POV with me?

If another employee(s) travels with you on the same trip in the same POV, mileage is payable to only one of you. No deduction will be made from your mileage allowance if other passengers contribute to defraying your expenses.
§ 301-70.503 What additional emergency expenses should we allow? When an employee discontinues a TDY assignment before its completion due to an incapacitating illness or injury, you may pay— ( a ) Transportation and per diem expenses for travel to an alternate location to receive medical treatment;
( b ) Transportation and per diem expenses to return to the official station; and
( c ) Transportation costs of a medically necessary attendant.
[FTR Amdt. 108, 67 FR 57967, Sept. 13, 2002]
Case 0:00-cr-06240-WPD Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2001 Page 1 of 1
§ 301-72.300 What procedures must we establish to collect unused, partially used, and exchanged tickets? You must establish administrative procedures providing: ( a ) Written instructions explaining traveler liability for the value of tickets issued until all ticket coupons are used or properly accounted for on the travel voucher;
( b ) Instructions for submitting payments received from carriers for failure to provide confirmed reserved space;
( c ) The traveler with a “bill charges to” address, so that the traveler can provide this information to the carrier for returned or exchanged tickets.
( d ) Procedures for promptly identifying any unused tickets, coupons, or other evidence of refund due the Government.
CONFIDENTIAL



## { 1of 1
```

[111th Congress Public Law 290]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 3063]]

Public Law 111-290
111th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2011, and for 
       other purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 4, 2010 -  [H.J. Res. 101]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2011 (Public Law 111-242) is amended by striking the 
date specified in section 106(3) <<NOTE: Ante, p. 2608.>>  and inserting 
``December 18, 2010''.

    Approved December 4, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 101:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Dec. 1, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 2, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
003P16

#### State v. Scott Matthew Spiron

1. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Notice of Appeal (COAP15-281)

1. Dismissed

2. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA

2. Dismissed
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 735 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 735

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide specific penalties 
      for taking a firearm from a Federal law enforcement officer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1999

Mr. Ney (for himself, Mr. Holden, Mr. Shows, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Oxley, 
Mr. English, Mr. Burr of North Carolina, and Mr. Weller) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide specific penalties 
      for taking a firearm from a Federal law enforcement officer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gun Retention Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. TAKING A FIREARM FROM A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 117. Taking a firearm from a law enforcement officer
    ``(a) Whoever knowingly takes a firearm--
            ``(1) from the person of a law enforcement officer, while 
        such officer is engaged in the performance of official duties; 
        and
            ``(2) against that officer's will;
or attempts to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
    ``(b) The punishment for an offense under this section is--
            ``(1) in the case of an offense other than an attempt, or 
        an offense that is an attempt during which the firearm is 
        discharged (other than intentionally by the officer), a fine 
        under this title and imprisonment for not less than 10 nor more 
        than 15 years; and
            ``(2) in the case of any other offense that is an attempt, 
        a fine under this title and imprisonment for not less than 5 
        nor more than 10 years.
    ``(c) A term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall not 
run concurrently with any other term of imprisonment imposed with 
respect to the same criminal episode.
    ``(d) As used in this section--
            ``(1) the term `firearm' has the meaning given that term in 
        section 921 of this title; and
            ``(2) the term `law enforcement officer' means a person 
        designated in section 1114 of this title.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 7 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``117. Taking a firearm from a law enforcement officer.''.
                                 <all>
```