alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 165 
          - [CGD01-00-005] 
          - RIN 2115-AA97 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DOT 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects a final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of June 8, 2000, concerning regulations for annual fireworks displays located on Sandy Hook Bay, Rondout Creek, Hempstead Harbor, the Arthur Kill, and the Hudson River. That document contained an incorrect amendatory instruction.                     

# DATES:

The correction is effective June 23, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lieutenant M. Day, Waterways Oversight Branch, Coast Guard Activities New York (718) 354-4012. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction 

In final rule FR Doc 00-14507, on page 36342, second column the amendatory instruction for item number 2 is incorrectly set out and a correction is needed. 

# PART 165—[CORRECTED]

### Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, in the publication on June 8, 2000, of the final rule [CGD01-00-005], which is the subject of FR Doc. 00-14507, make the following correction. On page 36342, second column, in amendatory instruction number 2, remove the word “revised” and add in its place the word “add”. 

Dated: June 19, 2000. 

Pamela M. Pelcovits, 

Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, United States Coast Guard, DOT.

[FR Doc. 00-15954 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
#### § 102-79.100 What must Federal agencies do with antenna siting fees that they collect?

The account into which an antenna siting fee is to be deposited depends on the authority under which the antenna site is made available and the fee assessed. For GSA-controlled property outleased under 40 U.S.C. 581(h) or section 412 of Division H of public law 108-447, the fee is to be deposited into GSA's Federal Building Fund. For surplus property outleased under 40 U.S.C. 543, the fee is to be deposited in accordance with the provisions of Subchapter IV of Chapter 5 of Subtitle I of Title 40 of the United States Code. For siting fees collected under other statutory authorities, the fees might be deposited into miscellaneous receipts, an account of the landholding agency, or as otherwise provided by law. Federal agencies should consult with their agency's legal advisors before depositing antenna proceed from sites on agency-controlled Federal property.
#### § 109-28.306-3 Limitations on use.

DOE offices and designated contractors shall establish internal controls for ensuring that the use of CSC accounts is limited to the purchase of items for official Government use.
# Comments on: 2022-1525: Posco v. US
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Granite Cliffs Incorporated, on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the  undersigned,
Ekaterina Luzgina,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting Officer of
the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2005


/s/ Ekaterina Luzgina
Ekaterina Luzgina
CEO, CFO, Chairman, Secretary, Director
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Crim. No. 1697.

Third Appellate District.

November 8, 1939.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. TONY MUNZIE, Appellant.

*398Fowler & Fowler for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney-General, and J. Q. Brown, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Stanislaus County of the crime of violation of an act to regulate the sale and use of poisons in the State of California, a felony.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court September 7,1939. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on November 8, 1939. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 3

- 0 0 664

- C V

Style: Tuttle Enterprises, Inc. and Watson & Taylor Management, Inc.

v Ray Truitt and Annie Truitt

Date motion filed * : February 14 , 2014

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record

Party filing motion: Court reporter

Document to be filed: Reporter’s record

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: August 27 , 201 3

Number of prior extensions: 0 Current Due date: August 27, 2013

Date Requested: March 16 , 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: March 17 , 2014

 T he Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

In her motion, the court reporter informs the Court that the parties made

payment arrangements for paying the reporter’s fee for preparing the reporter’s

record on February 14, 2014. Accordingly, we grant the motion.

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: February 25, 2014
Exhibit 4.2


 





AMENDMENT


To


THE VAPOR CORP.


2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


WHEREAS, Vapor Corp. (the “Company”) sponsors
and maintains the Vapor Corp. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan”);


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (“Board”)
has the authority, pursuant to Section 13.1 of the Plan, to amend the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Board now desires to revise and specify the
number of shares subject to the Plan;


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as set forth below.


 


	1:	Article 4 of the Plan is hereby revised to read as follows:



“4. Shares Subject to the Plan.


4.1. Subject to adjustment in accordance with Section
11, a total of 100,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock shall be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan, 3.57 of which
shall be available to be issued as Incentive Stock Options. During the term of the Awards, the Company shall keep available at
all times the number of shares of Common Stock required to satisfy such Awards.


4.2. Shares of Common Stock available for distribution
under the Plan may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares, treasury shares or shares reacquired by the
Company in any manner.


4.3. Subject to adjustment in accordance with Section
11, no Participant shall be granted, during any one year period, Options to purchase Common Stock and SARs with respect to more
than 50,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock in the aggregate or any other Awards with respect to more than 50,000,000,000 shares
of Common Stock in the aggregate. If an Award is to be settled in cash, the number of shares of Common Stock on which the Award
is based shall count toward the individual share limit set forth in this Section 4.






    


     

    

4.4 Any shares of Common Stock subject to an Award
that is canceled, forfeited or expires prior to exercise or realization, either in full or in part, shall again become available
for issuance under the Plan. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein: shares subject to an Award under the Plan
shall not again be made available for issuance or delivery under the Plan if such shares are (a) shares tendered in payment of
an Option, (b) shares delivered or withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation, or (c) shares covered by
a stock-settled SAR or other Awards that were not issued upon the settlement of the Award.”



	2.	In all other respects the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.



 





	/s/ Anthony Panariello	 	/s/ Clifford Friedman
	Anthony Panariello	 	Clifford Friedman
	 	 	 
	/s /Jeffrey Holman	 	 
	Jeffrey Holman	 	 



 



Dated: November 21, 2016
January 12,201 1 ACTIOI M 

## SlO-110113-01 0 COWTF^OLN O 

## i-7\RTMEN TO F •!;3PORWiOr ' / C 

### nr- r 

## RATION S ^;; i JMN 

## 3 1 P i - 5 U Th e Honorabl e Ra

y LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Re : Continuatio n o f

Alask aAirlines ' Essentia l Ai r Servic e a t Cordova . Gustavois . Petersburg . Wraneel Lan d Yakutat . Alaska . Docke t

OST-1998^89 9 Dea r Secretary LaHood : Pleas e le t m e ad dm y support for th e selectio n o f

Alask aAirline s t o provid e Essentia l Air Service . A s yo u ma

y kno w Cordov ai s asmall , remot e Alaska n communit y that relie s heavil y o n ai r

servic e fo

r acces s t o othe r communitie s i

n Alask aa s wel l a s t o th e Lowe r 4 8 state s an dt o Hawaii . Man y o f th e peopl e wh o liv e i

n Cordov a trave l frequently an dnee dthi s ai r servic e often for

eve n thei r

basi c needs . We d o hav e th e Marin e Highway , bu t i t i s no t availabl e o

n adail y basi s an dtherefore , th e ai r servic e provide db y Alask aAirline s i s extremel y essentia l t o ou r community . We mus t

rel y o n ai r

servic e t o acces s healt

h car e provider s wit hspecialtie s o r

fo r ongoin g treatment s suc ha s chemotherapy . W e ar e dependen t o n ai r servic e fo

r communicatio n wit

hprovider s o f

specifi c license s whic h ar e require do f man y i n ou r workforce . Peopl e mus t trave l t o Anchorag e o r

t o Juneau fo

r man y service s that

woul dotherwis e no t

b e availabl e t o them . Th e impac t

o n ou r community if

th e essentia l ai r

servic e provide db y Alask aAirline s i s no t provide dwoul db e keenl y felt . Man y o f

ou r basi c good s i

n additio n t o service s arriv e vi aair . We hav e certai n grocerie s tha t woul d otherwis e b e unavailabl e t o u s withou t ai r service . Furthermore , th e typ e o f

aircraf t flown b y Alask aAirline s i s equippe dwit h th e Require dNavigatio n Performanc e Technolog y precisio n technolog y enable s th e airlin e t o reliabl y acces s th e airpor t durin g inclemen t

weathe r whic hi s frequent. I

t thu s reduce s diversion s an dcancellation s an dprovide s fo r dependabilit y i

n th e delivery o f

bot h peopl e an dproduct s t o Cordova . Alaska' s je t servic e i s crucia l t o th e economi c an demotiona l wel l bein g o f ou r community . Fo r thes e reasons , I urg e DO T t o selec t Alask aAirline s t o continu e t o provid e essentia l ai r servic e t o Southcentra l an dSoutheas t

Alaska . Th e airlin e ha s don e thi s successftill y fo r more than thirty years . Sincerely , Susa n Hardin g Campu s Coordinator , Cordov a Princ e Willia

mSoun dCommunit y Colleg e cc ; Susan Kurland , Assistan t Secretary fo

r Aviatio n an dInternationa l Affair s Denni s DeVany , Chief

, HA S an dDomesti c Analysi s Th e Honorabl e Sean Pamell , Governor , State o f Alask a Marc A . Luiken , Commissioner , Alask aStat e Departmen t o f Transportatio n an dPubli c Facilitie s
AMERICAN GENERAL CORPORATION
               FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 1996




                                                                   Exhibit 11 


                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                    (Unaudited)
                        (In millions, except share data)

                                                        Nine Months Ended
                                                          September 30,      
                                                       1996          1995    
Primary:

   Net income available to common stock .......           $ 509         $ 536 

   Average shares outstanding
     Common stock .............................     205,277,279   204,829,566 
     Assumed conversion of mandatorily
      convertible preferred stock .............       1,495,929             - 
     Assumed exercise of stock options ........         616,869       412,194 

       Total ..................................     207,390,077   205,241,760 

   Net income per share .......................           $2.45         $2.61 


Fully Diluted:

   Net income .................................           $ 509         $ 536 
   Plus:  Net dividends on convertible 
    preferred securities of subsidiary ........               8             3 

       Net income available to common stock ...           $ 517         $ 539 


   Average shares outstanding
     Common stock .............................     205,277,279   204,829,566 
     Assumed conversion of convertible 
      preferred securities of subsidiary ......       6,144,016     2,745,677 
     Assumed conversion of mandatorily
      convertible preferred stock .............       1,810,175             - 
     Assumed exercise of stock options ........         703,776       587,882 

       Total ..................................     213,935,246   208,163,125 

   Net income per share .......................           $2.42         $2.59 
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-12-0001021 

10-AUG-2015 

10:48 AM 

SCWC-12-0001021
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

RICHARD M. RUH,


Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I,


Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS


(CAAP-12-0001021; S.P.P. NO. 12-1-0003)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant’s Application for Writ
 

of Certiorari, filed on June 29, 2015, is hereby rejected. 


DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 10, 2015.
 

Jeffrey A. Hawk

for petitioner
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 


/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1030

JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES MARINE

CORPS; BOARD OF CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS;

NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD; SECRETARY OF THE

NAVY; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Loan

Processing Section, Roanoke, Virginia; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Loan Guaranty Division; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF CLEVELAND, OHIO; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF

THE GENERAL COUNSEL, WASHINGTON, DC; SECRETARY

OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; DEPARTMENT OF THE

TREASURY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-95-743)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

John Rodgers Burnley, Appellant Pro Se. Roger William

Frydrychowksi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Burnley v. United States, No. CA-95-743 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 105-70.004 Investigation. ( a ) If an investigating official concludes that a subpoena pursuant to the authority conferred by 31 U.S.C. 3804(a) is warranted— ( 1 ) The subpoena so issued shall notify the person to whom it is addressed of the authority under which the subpoena is issued and shall identify the records or documents sought;
( 2 ) The investigating official may designate a person to act on his or her behalf to receive the documents sought; and
( 3 ) The person receiving such subpoena shall be required to tender to the investigating official or the person designated to receive the documents a certification that the documents sought have been produced, or that such documents are not available and the reasons therefor, or that such documents, suitably identified, have been withheld based upon the assertion of an identified privilege, or any combination of the foregoing.
( b ) If the investigating official concludes that an action under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act may be warranted, the investigating official shall submit a report containing the findings and conclusions of such investigation to the reviewing official.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall preclude or limit an investigating official's discretion to refer allegations directly to the Department of Justice for suit under the False Claims Act or other civil relief, or to defer or postpone a report or referral to the reviewing official to avoid interference with a criminal investigation or prosecution.
( d ) Nothing in this section modifies any responsibility of an investigating official to report violations of criminal law to the Attorney General.
§ 105-1.110 Deviation. ( a ) In the interest of establishing and maintaining uniformity to the greatest extent feasible, deviations; i.e., the use of any policy or procedure in any manner that is inconsistent with a policy or procedure prescribed in the Federal Property Management Regulations, are prohibited unless such deviations have been requested from and approved by the Administrator of General Services or his authorized designee. Deviations may be authorized by the Administrator of General Services or his authorized designee when so doing will be in the best interest of the Government. Request for deviations shall clearly state the nature of the deviation and the reasons for such special action.
( b ) Requests for deviations from the FPMR shall be sent to the General Services Administration for consideration in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) For onetime (individual) deviations, requests shall be sent to the address provided in the applicable regulation. Lacking such direction, requests shall be sent to the Administrator of General Services, Washington, DC 20405.
( 2 ) For class deviations, requests shall be sent to only the Administrator of General Services.
[55 FR 1673, Jan. 18, 1990]
#### § 109-27.5106-3 Returns.

All excess precious metals must be returned to the precious metals pool except as noted in § 109-27.5106-1 of this subpart. The pool is entirely dependent on metal returns; therefore, metal inventories should be maintained on an as-needed basis, and any excess metals must be returned to the pool for recycling. This includes precious metals in any form, including shapes, and scraps. Procedures have been developed by the precious metals pool contractor for metal returns, including storing, packaging, shipping, and security.
##### 



PERFORMANCE SHARE GRANT AGREEMENT
 Grantee:
    
    Jeffrey WeissTarget Grant:
    
    76,968 Class B Common Shares (the Shares)Performance Period:
    
    August 2, 2005 throughAugust 2, 2010Grant Date:
    
    August 2, 2005
  W I T N E S S E T H
  A G R E E M E N T
  Performance Share Grant
 Award of Performance Shares




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



Awards on Certain Events
  (i)
    
    fraud;(ii)
    
    misappropriation of funds;(iii)
    
    commission of a felony or of an act or series of acts which result in
material injury to the business reputation of the Company;(iv)
    
    commission of a crime or act or series of acts involving moral turpitude;(v)
    
    commission of an act or series of repeated acts of dishonesty that are
materially inimical to the best interests of the Company;(vi)
    
    willful and repeated failure to perform his duties, which failure has not
been cured in all substantial respects within fifteen (15) days after the Company
gives written notice thereof to Grantee; or(vii)
    
    material breach of any material provision of any employment agreement with
the Company, which breach has not been cured in all substantial respects within ten
(10) days after the Company gives written notice thereof to Grantee.
  (i)
    
    the Company reduces Grantees title, responsibilities, power or authority in
comparison with his title, responsibilities, power or authority on the date hereof;(ii)
    
    the Company assigns Grantee duties which are inconsistent with the duties
assigned to Grantee on the date hereof and which duties the Company persists in
assigning to Grantee despite the prior written objection of Grantee; or the Company
reduces Grantees annual base compensation (unless such decrease is proportionate with
a decrease in the base compensation of the executive officers of the Company as a
group), or materially reduces his group health, life, disability or other insurance
programs (including any such benefits provided to Grantees family), his pension,
retirement or profit-sharing benefits or any benefits provided by the Company, or
excludes him from any plan, program or arrangement, including but not limited to bonus
or incentive plans, in which the other executive officers of the Company are included.
 3




---



##### 



Payment of Award
 Ownership Rights
 Deferral of Exercise or Delivery of Shares
 General Provisions
 Administration.
 Notices.
 4




---



##### 



Taxation.
 Nontransferability.
 Not
an Employment Contract.
  Unsecured
Creditor Status.
 Fractional
Shares.
 Amendment
or Termination.
 5




---



##### 



AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Brian T. McGrathBrian McGrath, Vice President,Human ResourcesGRANTEE/s/ Jeffrey WeissName:
    
    Jeffrey Weiss
 6
387P15

#### State v. Judy Hardison

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-150)

1. Allowed 11/23/2105

Dissolved 01/28/2016

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Denied

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Denied