T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A Z B I L E G S H U R A ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70030 10- 73768 A ge nc yN os . A 098- 838- 000

A 098- 838- 001 A 098- 838- 002 ME MOR AN DU M * O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , P A E Z , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n the s e c ons ol i da t e d c a s e s , A z bi l e g S hur aa nd hi s f a m i l y , na t i ve s a nd ci t i zen s o f M o n g o l i a, p et i t i o n fo r rev i ew o f th e B o ardo f Im m i g rat i o n A p p eal s’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng the i rappe a l f r om the i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng the i rappl i c a t i ons f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd r e l i e f

unde rthe 

# FI LED APR26 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70030

C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) , a nd of the B I A ’ s or de rde ny i ng the i rm ot i on t o reopen. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i al ev i d en ce factual fi n d i n g s, ap p l yi n g th e n ew st an d ard s g o v ern i n g ad v erse c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n s c r e a te db yth e R E A L I D A c t. Sh restha v. H older , 590 F . 3d 1034, 1039 ( 9th C i r . 2010) . W e gr antthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w i n N o. 09- 70030 a n dr e m a n d , an dw e d is m is s th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w in N o . 1 0 - 7 3 7 6 8 . T h e r e is n o in c o n s is te n c yb e tw e e n S h u r a ’s d o c u m e n tarye v id e n c e a n dh is t e s t i m onyw i th r e s pe c tt o the y e artha tthe H e a l thyS oc i e tyC i t i z e n’ s M ove m e nt s tarte d . See Morga n v. Mukasey , 529 F . 3d 1202, 1209 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( no i ncon si st encybetw ee n app l i cat i on and t es t i m on y) . In addi t i on , the di sc re pancy re g ar d in g th e d ate w h ich S h u rab ec am e S ec re tary o f th e H ea lth y S o ciety C it izen ’s M o v e m e n t is atr iv ia l in c o n s is te n c yth a t h a s n o b e ar in g o n S h u r a ’s c r e d ib ility . See R en v. H o lder, 648 F . 3d 1079 , 1 0 8 5 - 8 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) ( “m in o rd is c r e p an c ie s in da t e s tha t . . . c annotbe vi e w e d a s a tt e m pt s bythe appl i c antt o e nha nc e hi s c l a i m s of pe r s e c ut i on ha ve no be ar i ng on c r e di bi l i ty ” ) . F i na l l y , c ons i de r i ng the “ t ot a l i tyof the c i r c um s t anc e s , ” the l a s ti nc ons i s t e nc ythe I Jc i t e d appe ar s t o be a n “ i nnoc e nt m i st ake. ” Se e i d. a t1087. T he r e f or e , s ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e doe s nots upportthe a g e n c y ’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityf in d in g . See i d. a t1089. A c c or di ngl y , w e r e m and S hur a ’ s a s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd C A T c l a i m s , on a n ope n r e c or d, f or09- 70030

f u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s c o n s is te n t w ith th is d is p o s itio n . See Soto-O larte v . H older , 5 5 5 F .3 d1 0 8 9 , 1 0 9 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ; IN S v. V en tu ra , 537 U . S . 12, 16- 18 ( 2002) (percuri am ). I n lig h t o f

o u rab o v e c o n c lu s io n , w e d is m is s a s m o o t S h u r a ’s c h a lle n g e to th e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f

h is m o tio n to r e o p e n . No . 0 9 - 7 0 0 3 0 : P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D. No . 1 0 - 7 3 7 6 8 : P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.