alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND FROM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,563
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  564,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    313,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               926,814
<PP&E>                                       3,498,897
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,667,501)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,965,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          796,433
<BONDS>                                        593,261
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,619
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,262,733
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,965,609
<SALES>                                      1,018,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,038,203
<CGS>                                          838,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,022
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,022
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
§ 50-201.501 Records of employment. Every contractor subject to the provisions of the act and this part shall maintain the following records of employment which shall be available for the inspection and transcription of authorized representatives of the Secretary of Labor: ( a ) Name, address, sex, and occupation of each employee covered by the contract stipulations;
( b ) Date of birth of each employee under 19 years of age; and if the employer has obtained a certificate of age as provided in § 50-201.105, there shall also be recorded the title and address of the office issuing such certificate, the number of the certificate, if any, the date of its issuance, and the name, address and date of birth of the minor, as the same appears on the certificate of age;
( c ) Wage-and-hour records for each such employee including the rate of wages and the amount paid each pay period, the hours worked each day and each week, and the period during which each such employee was engaged on a Government contract with the number of such contract. Compliance with this paragraph shall be deemed complete if wage-and-hour records for all employees in the plant are maintained during the period between the award of any Government contract and the date of delivery of the materials, supplies, articles, or equipment: *Provided,* That where no separate records for employees engaged on Government contracts are maintained, it shall be presumed until affirmative proof is present to the contrary that all employees in the plant, from the date of award of any such contract until the date of delivery of the materials, supplies, articles or equipment, were engaged on such Government contract;
( d ) The records required by paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section shall be kept on file for at least 3 years from their last date of entry;
( e ) Basic employment and earnings records: All basic time and earning cards or sheets of the employer on which are entered the daily starting and stopping time of individual employees or of separate work forces, or the individual employees' daily, weekly, or pay period amounts of work accomplished (for example, units produced) when those amounts determine in whole or in part the pay period earnings or wages of those employees;
( f ) Wage rate tables: All tables or schedules of the employer which provide the piece rates or other rates used in computing straight-time earnings, wages or salary, or overtime excess compensation;
( g ) Work time schedules: All schedules or tables of the employer which establish the hours and days of employment of individual employees or of separate work forces;
( h ) The records required by paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) of this section shall be kept on file at least 2 years from their last date of entry or their last effective date whichever is later.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1215-0017) [7 FR 7949, Oct. 7, 1942, as amended at 13 FR 5440, Sept. 17, 1948; 23 FR 2573, Apr. 18, 1958. Redesignated at 24 FR 10952, Dec. 30, 1959, and amended at 47 FR 145, Jan. 5, 1982]
#### § 102-34.260 May we replace a Government-owned motor vehicle sooner?

Yes. You may replace a Government-owned motor vehicle if it needs body or mechanical repairs that exceed the fair market value of the motor vehicle. Determine the fair market value by adding the current market value of the motor vehicle plus any capitalized motor vehicle additions (such as a utility body or liftgate) or repairs. Your agency head or designee must review the replacement in advance.
No. 10-11291.

#### McNeill *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Sep 17 2010 

Mr. Darren Smith 

P.O. Box 17307 

Minneapolis, MN 55417 

Dear Mr. Smith: 

In your February 23, 2010 letter, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to amend SFAR 73, paragraph 2(a)(1), of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). 

You have made some good points. However, when the FAA responds to petitions for 

rulemaking, it must follow the requirements of 14 CFR part 11, particularly those 

guidelines for processing petitions for rulemaking found in § 11.73. As stated in that 

section, the FAA uses the following criteria when making a decision as to whether or not 

to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking: 

1) the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises; 

2) the priority of other FAA issues; and 

3) the resources we have available to address these issues. 

In SFAR 73, both certified flight instructor and certificated flight instructor are used to 

describe an instructor. The term “certified flight instructor” is commonly used to refer to 

the holder of a flight instructor certificate. The term is used in both industry and in many 

FAA publications. The common definition of certificated is “to testify to or authorized 

by a certificate; especially, certify.” 

The FAA believes SFAR 73, paragraph (5), clearly establishes who may provide 

instruction or conduct a flight review in a Robinson R-22 or R-44. 
2

For the reasons above, we are unable to consider and thereby deny your petition for 

rulemaking in accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73. 

Accordingly, Docket No. FAA-2010-0188 is being closed. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE   
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. 
RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
WHEREAS, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (the “Company”) is the Plan Sponsor of the Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Plan Section 7.01 the Plan may be amended at anytime; and
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2016 the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Evonik Industries AG (“Evonik”) whereby the Company agreed to sell, convey, assign, transfer and deliver to Evonik the right, title and interest of the Company PMD Business and whereby Evonik agreed to purchase, acquire and accept from the Company the PMD Business, the terms of which are set forth in the Purchase Agreement by and between Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Evonik Industries AG Dated as of May 6, 2016 (the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company desires to amend the Plan to update Schedule I and to vest the Core Contribution of employees of the Company’s PMD Business who will become employees of Evonik who are Participants in the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


		
	1.
	Schedule I is amended as attached hereto. 



		
	2.
	A new paragraph is added to the end of Section 3.05(a) to read as follows: 




“Effective the later of January 3, 2017 or the Closing, in the case of a Participant who prior to the Closing as defined in the Purchase Agreement by and between Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Evonik Industries AG Dated as of May 6, 2016 (the “Evonik Agreement”) was employed by the Company’s PMD Business as that term is defined in the Evonik Agreement and who upon the Closing will become an employee of Evonik Industries AG or one of its affiliates, such Participant shall have a vested, nonforfeitable right to the portion of the Participant’s account attributable to Company Core Contributions, including any related investment earnings and losses.” 

		
	3.
	In all other respects the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its Vice President, Human Resources to execute this Second Amendment to the Plan on this ________________ day of December 2016.


AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.


By: ________________________________     
              Jennifer L. Grant 
               Vice President- Human Resources 
 
 










SCHEDULE I
PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS
AS OF 1 January 2017


	
			
	Name of Affiliated Company
	Participating Employer Since Date
	Revocation Date

	ProCal
	2 March 2015
	N/A

	Air Products Energy Enterprising, Inc.
	Continuing
	N/A

	Air Products Helium, Inc.
	Continuing
	N/A

	Air Products Manufacturing Co., Inc.
	Continuing
	N/A

	Air Products LLC
	1 June 2007
	N/A

	Air Products Performance Manufacturing, Inc. (formerly known as “Tomah Products, Inc.” and “Tomah Reserve, Inc.”)
	1 April 2006
	The Later of January 3, 2017 or the Closing

	Versum Materials US, LLC
	1 August 2016
	1 October 2016
No. 11-1046.

#### Smith et al. *v.*Wyeth, Inc., et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15823]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and 
Engineering; Committee of Visitors; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science 
and Engineering (1115).
    Date and Time: July 6-7, 2000--8:30-5:00 p.m. each day.
    Place: Room 1150, NSF, and 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open--(see Agenda, below).
    Contact Person: Dr. Michael Evangelist, Division Director, 
Computer-Communication Research, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1910.
    Minutes: Meeting minutes may be obtained by contacting the 
person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out Committee of Visitors (COV) 
review, including program evaluation, GPRA assessments, and access 
to privileged materials.

Agenda

    Closed: July 6--To review the merit review processes covering 
funding decisions made during the immediately preceding three fiscal 
year of the Computer-Communications Research Division.
    Open: July 7--To assess the results of NSF program investments 
in the Computer-Communications Division. This shall involve a 
discussion and review of results focused on NSF and grantee outputs 
and related outcomes achieved or realized during the preceding three 
fiscal years. These results may be based on NSF grants or other 
investments made in earlier years.
    Reason for Closing: During the closed session, the Committee 
will be reviewing proposal actions that will include privileged 
intellectual property and personal information that could harm 
individuals if they are disclosed. If discussions were open to the 
public, these matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) 
and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act would be improperly 
disclosed.

    Dated: June 19, 2000.
Karen York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15823 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40830

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

RAY M. NICHOLS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 807

Filed: December 31, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Melissa Moody, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for correction of illegal sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Spencer J. Hahn, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Mark W. Olson, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Ray M. Nichols was found guilty by a jury of robbery. I.C. § 18-6503. The district court 

sentenced Nichols to a fixed life term of imprisonment. Nichols filed an I.C.R 35 motion for 

correction of an illegal sentence, which the district court denied. Nichols appeals.1

Mindful of I.C. §§ 18-6503 and 19-2513, Nichols contends that, at the time his sentence 

was imposed, he could not be sentenced to “fixed life.” Pursuant to Rule 35, the district court 

may correct an illegal sentence at any time. In an appeal from the denial of a motion under Rule 

35 to correct an illegal sentence, the question of whether the sentence imposed is illegal is a 

 

1 Nichols was also found guilty of burglary and sentenced to a concurrent determinate term 

of five years. However, he does not challenge this sentence on appeal.
2

question of law freely reviewable by the appellate court. State v. Josephson, 124 Idaho 286, 287, 

858 P.2d 825, 826 (Ct. App. 1993); State v. Rodriguez, 119 Idaho 895, 897, 811 P.2d 505, 507 

(Ct. App. 1991). 

Having reviewed the record in this case, we conclude that Nichols has failed to 

demonstrate that his sentence is illegal. Idaho Code Section 18-6503, when read with I.C. § 19-

2513, provided that Nichols could be sentenced to a fixed life term. Thus, the district court did 

not err in denying Nichols’s Rule 35 motion. Therefore, the district court’s order denying 

Nichols’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
§ 109-43.307-50 Export controlled personal property. ( a ) When personal property that is subject to export controls is being exported directly by DOE (*e.g.,* a transfer of nuclear equipment or materials as part of a program of cooperation with another country), DOE or the DOE contractor must obtain the necessary export license.
( b ) When personal property subject to export controls is transferred under work-for-others agreements, co-operative agreements, or technical programs, the recipients will be informed in writing that: ( 1 ) The property is subject to export controls;
( 2 ) They are responsible for obtaining export licenses or authorizations prior to transferring or moving the property to another country; and
( 3 ) They are required to pass on export control guidance if they transfer the property to another domestic or foreign recipient.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                            392
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,928
<ALLOWANCES>                                      590
<INVENTORY>                                    49,343
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                          7,754
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 64,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       19,303
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   64,125
<SALES>                                        11,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               48,427
<CGS>                                           6,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  42,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,077
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,842
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,849
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,993
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,993
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .69
        


</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 720

To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to require that a

State having an approved coastal zone management program must be

provided a copy of an environmental impact statement to enable its

review under that Act of any plan for exploration or development of,

or production from, any area in the coastal zone of the State.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. GOSS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to

require that a State having an approved coastal zone

management program must be provided a copy of an

environmental impact statement to enable its review

under that Act of any plan for exploration or development of, or production from, any area in the coastal

zone of the State.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘OCS Environmental

5 Consistency Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 720 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT STATE HAVE ENVIRON2 MENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO REVIEW

3 PLAN FOR EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT, OR

4 PRODUCTION IN THE COASTAL ZONE OF THE

5 STATE.

6 Section 307(c)(3) of the Coastal Zone Management

7 Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3)) is amended by adding

8 at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B), a State shall

10 not be considered to have received all necessary data and

11 information with respect to a plan for exploration, develop12 ment, or production, before the date the State has received

13 a copy of an environmental impact statement under sec14 tion 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act

15 of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)) that applies to that explo16 ration, development, or production.’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6675

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LAWRENCE MCCOY HOLMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-95-13, CA-97-282-R)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Steven

Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Holman, Nos. CR-95-13; CA-97-282-R (W.D.

Va. Mar. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Organization Signed application Date voted in

Believers of Authority, Inc. Yes/ 9-Jul-20

Bulah Baptist Church Yes/

Carver Alumni Association ????

Coconut Grove Ministerial Alliance, Inc. Yes/ 9-Jul-20

Collective Empowerment Group Yes/

Greater Faith Temple Yes/ 27-Jun-21

Homeowner & Tenants Assoc. NO (voted against joining)

Macedonia Missionary Baptist Church Yes/ 9-Jul-20

Negro Women's Club Yes/

St. James Baptist Church Yes/

St. Matthew CMB Church Yes/ 9-Jul-20

St. Paul A.M.E. Church Yes/

St. Paul CDC Yes/ 9-Jul-20

St. Stephens Episcopal Church Coconut Grove Yes/

Thelma Gibson Iniative ??

United Church of God, Inc.

Carve School Alumni Assoc. Pending

Charles Avenue Group Pending

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 172-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 172-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report of Capital Corp of the West (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas T. Hawker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 11,
2005




/s/ Thomas T. Hawker Thomas T. Hawker President and Chief Executive Officer


33

---
#### Kelvin FIELDS v. ALABAMA DEP’T OF CORR.

CR-14-0152

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

01/30/2015

Affirmed
No. 10-10919.

#### Rose *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### §§ 51-10.104-51-10.109 [Reserved]