alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 101-4.430 Financial assistance. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, in providing financial assistance to any of its students, a recipient shall not: ( 1 ) On the basis of sex, provide different amounts or types of such assistance, limit eligibility for such assistance that is of any particular type or source, apply different criteria, or otherwise discriminate;
( 2 ) Through solicitation, listing, approval, provision of facilities, or other services, assist any foundation, trust, agency, organization, or person that provides assistance to any of such recipient's students in a manner that discriminates on the basis of sex; or
( 3 ) Apply any rule or assist in application of any rule concerning eligibility for such assistance that treats persons of one sex differently from persons of the other sex with regard to marital or parental status.
( b ) *Financial aid established by certain legal instruments.* ( 1 ) A recipient may administer or assist in the administration of scholarships, fellowships, or other forms of financial assistance established pursuant to domestic or foreign wills, trusts, bequests, or similar legal instruments or by acts of a foreign government that require that awards be made to members of a particular sex specified therein; *Provided,* that the overall effect of the award of such sex-restricted scholarships, fellowships, and other forms of financial assistance does not discriminate on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) To ensure nondiscriminatory awards of assistance as required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, recipients shall develop and use procedures under which: ( i ) Students are selected for award of financial assistance on the basis of nondiscriminatory criteria and not on the basis of availability of funds restricted to members of a particular sex;
( ii ) An appropriate sex-restricted scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance is allocated to each student selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section; and
( iii ) No student is denied the award for which he or she was selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section because of the absence of a scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance designated for a member of that student's sex.
( c ) *Athletic scholarships.* ( 1 ) To the extent that a recipient awards athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid, it must provide reasonable opportunities for such awards for members of each sex in proportion to the number of students of each sex participating in interscholastic or intercollegiate athletics.
( 2 ) A recipient may provide separate athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid for members of each sex as part of separate athletic teams for members of each sex to the extent consistent with this paragraph (c) and § 101-4.450.
#### § 302-2.9 When must I complete all aspects my relocation?

You and your immediate family member(s) must complete all aspects of your relocation within one year from the effective date of your transfer or appointment, except as provided in § 302-2.10 or § 302-2.11.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18336, Apr. 1, 2011. Redesignated and amended by FTR Amdt. 2014-01, 79 FR 49644, Aug. 21, 2014]
No. 10-11114.

#### Goodwin *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15990]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Form Number, and OMB Number: Defense Export Loan Guarantee 
(DELG) Application; DD Form 2747; OMB Number 0704-0391.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Number of Respondents: 20.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 20.
    Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 20.
    Needs and Uses: The collection of information is necessary to 
review and process applications for loan guarantees issued under 10 
U.S.C. 2540 for defense exports. Respondents are defense suppliers or 
exporters, lenders or nations, who are requesting a DoD guarantee of a 
private sector loan in support of the sale or long term lease, to 
certain eligible countries, of U.S. defense articles, services, or 
design and construction services. The completed form will enable the 
Department to determine whether the proposed transaction meets 
statutory guidance for program implementation.
    Affected Public: Business or Other For-Profit.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Lewis W. Oleinick.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Oleinick at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD (Acquisition), Room 10236, New 
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: June 19, 2000.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-15990 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
No. 11-9314.

#### Lee *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
§ 109-28.000-51 Storage guidelines. ( a ) Indoor storage areas should be arranged to obtain proper stock protection and maximum utilization of space within established floor load capacities.
( b ) Storage yards for items not requiring covered protection shall be protected by locked fenced enclosures to the extent necessary to protect the Government's interest.
( c ) Storage areas shall be prominently posted to clearly indicate that the property stored therein is U.S. Government property, with entrance to such areas restricted to authorized personnel only.
( d ) Property in storage must be protected from fire, theft, deterioration, or destruction. In addition certain items require protection from dampness, heat, freezing, or extreme temperature changes. Other items must be stored away from light and odors, protected from vermin infestation, or stored separately because of their hazardous characteristics.
( e ) Hazardous or contaminated property, including property having a history of use in an area where exposure to contaminated property may have occurred, shall not be commingled with non-contaminated property, but stored separately in accordance with instructions from the environmental, safety, and health officials.
( f ) Unless inappropriate or impractical until declared excess, nuclear-related and proliferation-sensitive property shall be identified as such by use of a certification tag signed by an authorized program official (designated in writing with signature cards on file in the personal property management office). Such personal property shall not be commingled with other personal property, but stored separately in accordance with instructions from the cognizant program office.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Transfer of jurisdiction of certain lands within the boundaries of the Uinta National Forest to the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

# SUMMARY:

On March 16, 1999, Shellie Nall, General Supply Specialist, Bureau of Reclamation, signed three Property Vouchers transferring jurisdiction of 315 acres of land within the Ashley National Forest, and 1,852.48 acres of land within the Uinta National Forest to the United States of America, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

This action is in compliance with Section 6 of the Dutch John Federal Property Disposition and Assistance Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-326).

Copies of the Property Vouchers are available for public inspection at the Chief's Office, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Auditors Building, 201 14th Street, SW., at Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250, or the Ashley National Forest, 355 North Vernal Avenue, Vernal, UT 84078.

Dated: June 12, 2000.

Jack G. Troyer,

Deputy Regional Forester, Intermountain Region, USDA Forest Service, 324 25th Street, Ogden, UT 84401, (801) 625-5605.

[FR Doc. 00-15783 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### § 302-6.7 Must my agency authorize payment of a TQSE allowance?

No, TQSE is a discretionary allowance. Your agency determines whether it is in the Government's interest to pay TQSE.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 582 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 582

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for more equitable 
        policies relating to overtime pay for Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

    Mr. Davis of Virginia (for himself, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mrs. 
   Morella, and Mr. Hoyer) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for more equitable 
        policies relating to overtime pay for Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employees Overtime Pay Act 
of 1999''.

SEC. 2. REVISED LIMITATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``GS-10'' each place it appears and inserting ``GS-
15''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--(1) Paragraph (3) of section 5542(a) of 
title 5, United States Code, is repealed.
    (2) Section 5545(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end (as a flush left sentence) the following:
``For purposes of applying this subsection, the reference in paragraph 
(1) to section 5542(a)(3) shall be considered made to that provision, 
as last in effect before the date of enactment of the Federal Employees 
Overtime Pay Act of 1999.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect at the start of the first full pay period in the first calendar 
year beginning at least 9 months after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX-4.5



 Exhibit 4.5 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

MAKEMYTRIP 
 2010 SHARE
INCENTIVE PLAN 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to the MakeMyTrip 2010 Share Incentive Plan, is made and
adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of MakeMyTrip Limited (the “Company”), effective as of Closing (as defined in the Transaction Agreement by and among MIH Internet Sea Private Limited, the Company and
MIH B2C Holdings B.V., dated as of October 18, 2016 (the “Transaction Agreement”)). All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan (as defined
below). 
 RECITALS 

WHEREAS, the Company maintains MakeMyTrip 2010 Share Incentive Plan (as amended by the First Amendment, the “Plan”); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11.3 of the Plan, the Board has the authority to amend or modify the Plan from time to time; and 

WHEREAS, the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Plan as set forth herein. 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the Closing: 

AMENDMENT 
  

	1.	Section 3.1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 


“(a) Subject to Section 12.2 and Section 3.1(b) the aggregate number of Shares which may be issued or transferred
pursuant to Awards under the Plan is equal to the sum of (x) 8,281,561 Shares, plus (y) in the event that any Indigo SARs or Naspers Rollover RSUs are forfeited between the date of the Transaction Agreement and the Closing as a result of an
Indigo Business Employee’s termination of employment during such period, a number of Shares in respect of restricted share units into which such forfeited Indigo SARs and Naspers Rollover RSUs would have converted pursuant to Sections
7.07(a)(i) and 7.07(a)(ii) of the Transaction Agreement (each such defined term having the meaning ascribed to such term in the Transaction Agreement).” 
  

	2.	This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated into and forms a part of the Plan. 

  

	3.	Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

  

	4.	The effectiveness of this Amendment is subject to and conditioned upon the occurrence of the Closing, and shall be null and void and of no force or effect if the Closing does not occur for any reason. 


[Signature page follows] 








*        *        * 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of MakeMyTrip Limited on October 18, 2016. 

Executed on this 18th day of October, 2016. 

 

					
	By:	 	 /s/ Mohit Kabra

		 	Name:	 	Mohit Kabra
		 	Title:	 	Group CFO
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 819

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Maritime Commission for fiscal

years 2000 and 2001.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Mr. SHUSTER (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. GILCHREST, and Mr.

DEFAZIO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Maritime

Commission for fiscal years 2000 and 2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Maritime

5 Commission Authorization Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FED7 ERAL MARITIME COMMISSION.

8 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Fed9 eral Maritime Commission—

10 (1) for fiscal year 2000, $15,685,000; and
2

•HR 819 IH

1 (2) for fiscal year 2001, $16,312,000.

Æ
No. 11-8352.

#### Vivas *v.*Florida Department of Children and Families.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion.

Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. Douglas
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge Donald Ray Lee Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

d0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

137387 & (57)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137387 COA: 277098 Wayne CC: 06-008379-01 CARLOS EMANUEL COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 21, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for
miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - [Transmittal No. 00-43]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 00-43 with attached transmittal, policy justification and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: June 13, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 38260)          ( print page 38261)          ( print page 38262)          ( print page 38263)    

BILLING CODE 5001-01-M 

[FR Doc. 00-15439 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DOMINIQUE JEVON PERRY

From Guilford County

No. 81A14

ORDER

The Court, on its own motion, orders that the parties submit supplemental briefs on the effect of *Montgomery v. Louisiana,*No. 14-280,2016 WL 280758 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2016, revised Jan. 27, 2016), on the proceedings in this case. Defendant’s supplemental brief shall be filed no later than thirty days after the date of this order, and the State’s supplemental brief shall be filed no later than thirty days following defendant’s filing.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 28th day of January, 2016.

s/Ervin. J.

For the Court

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 29th day of January, 2016.

CHRISTIE SPEIR CAMERON Clerk of the Supreme Court

s/M.C. Hacknev Assistant Clerk
[Cite as Imburgia v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. , 2011-Ohio-1768.] 

# Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

CHARLES IMBURGIA

Plaintiff

v.

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION

Defendant

Case No. 2010-12214-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL

{¶ 1} On November 29, 2010, plaintiff, Charles Imburgia, filed a complaint against defendant, Department of Rehabilitat ion and Correction. Plaintiff alleges on June 14, 2010 at approximately 9:55 a.m., defendant’s agent refused to allow him to use the restroom facility resulting in him defecating on himself. Plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of $2,500.00. The filing fee was waived. {¶ 2} On December 22, 2010, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Defendant asserts that plaintiff’s case should be dismissed on two grounds. First, plaintiff asserts that defendant’s agent acted manifestly outside the scope of defendant’s agent’s employment, with malicious purpose, in bad faith or in wanton or reckless manner. This court does not have subject matter jurisdiction concerning an individual who acts beyond the scope of his employment. Second, plaintiff asserts his constitutional rights

were violated. It is well settled that constitutional claims are not actionable in the Court of Claims. For these reasons plaintiff’s case should be dismissed. {¶ 3} On December 30, 2010, plaintiff filed an objection to defendant’s motion toCase No. 2010-12214-AD - 2 - ENTRY

dismiss. It appears from a reading of this document that plaintiff asserts defendant is in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Constitutional

claims are not actionable in the Court of Claims. Bleicher v. Univ. of Cincinnati College

of Med. (1992), 78 Ohio App. 3d 302, 604 N.E. 2d 783; Burkey v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (1988), 38 Ohio App. 3d 170, 528 N.E. 2d 607. {¶ 4} Therefore, defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s case is

DISMISSED. the court shall absorb the court costs of this case.

________________________________ DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk

Entry cc:

Charles Imburgia, #502-009 Stephen A. Young 1800 S. Avon Belden Road Department of Rehabilitation Grafton, Ohio 44044 and Correction 770 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43222 DRB/laa Filed 1/21/11 Sent to S.C. reporter 4/8/11
§ 105-72.204 Special award conditions. If an applicant or recipient: ( a ) Has a history of poor performance,
( b ) Is not financially stable,
( c ) Has a management system that does not meet the standards prescribed in this regulation,
( d ) Has not conformed to the terms and conditions of a previous award, or
( e ) Is not otherwise responsible;
Federal awarding agencies may impose additional requirements as needed, provided that such applicant or recipient is notified in writing as to: the nature of the additional requirements, the reason why the additional requirements are being imposed, the nature of the corrective action needed, the time allowed for completing the corrective actions, and the method for requesting reconsideration of the additional requirements imposed. Any special conditions shall be promptly removed once the conditions that prompted them have been corrected.