alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 13, 2011

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System

400 7* Street, SW., Room PL401 Washington, DC 2059 1-000 1

Submitted via FAA Docket 2005-22227

RE: Request for Renewal of Exemption 8636 from 14 CFR Part 121.434(c)(1)(ii)

I am petitioning on behalf of Ameristar Air Cargo, Inc. (Ameristar) for an extension of Exemption 8636 (Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2005-22227) beyond its current expiration date of September 30, 2011.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted exemption 8636 to Ameristar Air Cargo, Inc. (Ameristar) on September 15, 2005. This exemption is from §121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) and permits Ameristar to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) while that PIC is performing prescribed duties during at least one flight that includes a takeoff and a landing when completing initial or upgrade training as specified in Section 121.424.

Granting an extension to Exemption No. 8636 would be in the public interest for the same reasons stated in Ameristar’s original request of exemption (Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2005-22227-1).

Thank you for your time and consideration of this petition for exemption.

Sincerely,

Pat Hulsey Director of Operations
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 804

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to revise existing

regulations concerning the conditions of participation for hospitals and

ambulatory surgical centers under the Medicare Program relating to

certified registered nurse anesthetists’ services to make the regulations

consistent with State supervision requirements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. NUSSLE (for himself, Mr. COYNE, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr.

BROWN of Ohio, and Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to

revise existing regulations concerning the conditions of

participation for hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers under the Medicare Program relating to certified

registered nurse anesthetists’ services to make the regulations consistent with State supervision requirements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anesthesia Services

5 Preservation Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 804 IH

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

2 Congress makes the following findings:

3 (1) Certified registered nurse anesthetists

4 (CRNAs) provide more than 65 percent of the Na5 tion’s anesthetics.

6 (2) CRNAs are the sole anesthesia provider in

7 at least 65 percent of rural hospitals.

8 (3) In 1994, the Health Care Financing Admin9 istration (HCFA) issued a draft regulation deferring

10 to State law on the issue of physician supervision of

11 CRNAs.

12 (4) HCFA has issued a proposed rule deferring

13 to State law on the issue of physician supervision of

14 CRNAs in 1997.

15 (5) Many hospitals and health care profes16 sionals are concerned about the erroneous allegation

17 that surgeons are somehow automatically liable for

18 the acts of CRNAs and that this allegation serves as

19 a disincentive to use and work with CRNAs, and

20 may serve to limit consumer access to CRNAs’ anes21 thesia services, particularly in rural areas.

22 (6) HCFA has failed to issue a final rule with

23 respect to this issue after many years.
3

•HR 804 IH

1 SEC. 3. REVISIONS OF CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION TO

2 FOSTER CONSISTENCY WITH STATE SUPER3 VISION STANDARDS.

4 (a) PROMULGATION OF REVISED REGULATIONS.—

5 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall revise

6 any regulations establishing medicare conditions of par7 ticipation for hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers re8 lating to anesthesia services under title XVIII of the Social

9 Security Act to provide that such regulations may not im10 pose supervisory or related requirements on the perform11 ance of those services by certified registered nurse anes12 thetists.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The revisions to the regula14 tions required by subsection (a) shall apply with respect

15 to anesthesia services furnished on or after January 1,

16 2000.

Æ
#### § 109-1.5000 Scope of subpart.

This subpart supplements the FPMR/FMR, states DOE personal property management policy and program objectives, and prescribes authorities and responsibilities for the conduct of an efficient personal property management program in DOE.
JOSEPH BENJAMIN 

CALLOWAY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1329

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Suzanne Bass, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Brittany Nicole O'Neill, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
# Euroopa Liidu C 20A/27.

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 20A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 52. köide27. jaanuar 2009 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 20A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

52. köide27. jaanuar 2009

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT JA ORGANITELT |
| | Euroopa Parlament |
| 2009/C 020A/01 | Otsus | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT JA ORGANITELT

Euroopa Parlament

2009/C 020A/01

Otsus

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT JA ORGANITELT

Euroopa Parlament

| 27.1.2009 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 20/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2009

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 20/1

---

OTSUS

(2009/C 20 A/01)

EUROOPA PARLAMENDI PEASEKRETÄR,

võttes arvesse nõukogu määrusega (EMÜ, Euratom, ESTÜ) nr 259/68 kehtestatud Euroopa ühenduste ametnike personalieeskirju ja muude teenistujate teenistustingimusi, mida on viimati muudetud nõukogu määrusega (EÜ, Euratom) nr 723/2004, ning eriti personalieeskirjade artiklit 30,

võttes arvesse juhatuse otsust ametisse nimetava asutuse määramise kohta, mida on viimati muudetud 26. oktoobril 2004,

võttes arvesse järgmiste üldkonkursside tulemusi:

PE/90/A, PE/91/A, PE/94/A, PE/95/A, PE/96/A, PE/97/A, PE/98/A, PE/99/A, PE/66/S, PE/67/S, PE/72/S, PE/80/S, PE/87/S, PE/88/S, PE/89/S, PE/91/S, A/94, A/95, A/96-P, A/97-P, EUR/A/155, EUR/A/158, EUR/A/159, EUR/A/161, EUR/A/167, EUR/A/169, EUR/LA/156, EUR/LA/157, PE/32/B, PE/34/B, PE/69/S, B/174-P, B/175-P, B/176-P, B/177-P, PE/133/C, PE/134/C, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006,

võttes arvesse ühiskomisjoni 19. novembri 2008. aasta koosolekul võetud seisukohta,

O T S U S T A B:

Artikkel 1

Üldkonkursside nr

| | PE/94/A, PE/95/A, PE/96/A, PE/97/A, PE/98/A, PE/99/A, PE/66/S, PE/67/S, PE/72/S, PE/80/S, |
| --- | --- |

PE/94/A, PE/95/A, PE/96/A, PE/97/A, PE/98/A, PE/99/A, PE/66/S, PE/67/S, PE/72/S, PE/80/S,

| | PE/91/S, A/94, A/95, A/96-P, A/97-P, |
| --- | --- |

PE/91/S, A/94, A/95, A/96-P, A/97-P,

| | EUR/A/167, EUR/A/169, |
| --- | --- |

EUR/A/167, EUR/A/169,

| | EUR/LA/156, EUR/LA/157, |
| --- | --- |

EUR/LA/156, EUR/LA/157,

| | PE/34/B, PE/69/S, B/174-P, B/175-P, B/176-P, B/177-P, |
| --- | --- |

PE/34/B, PE/69/S, B/174-P, B/175-P, B/176-P, B/177-P,

| | PE/133/C, PE/134/C, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006 |
| --- | --- |

PE/133/C, PE/134/C, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006

reservnimekirjade kehtivusaega pikendatakse 31. detsembrini 2009.

Artikkel 2

Üldkonkursside nr

| | PE/90/A, PE/91/A, PE/87/S, PE/88/S, PE/89/S, EUR/A/155, EUR/A/158, EUR/A/159, EUR/A/161, |
| --- | --- |

PE/90/A, PE/91/A, PE/87/S, PE/88/S, PE/89/S, EUR/A/155, EUR/A/158, EUR/A/159, EUR/A/161,

| | PE/32/B |
| --- | --- |

PE/32/B

reservnimekirjade kehtivusaega ei pikendata.

Luxembourg, 8. detsember 2008

peasekretär

Harald RØMER

---
#### § 102-80.55 Are Federal agencies responsible for managing the execution of risk reduction projects?

Yes, Federal agencies must manage the execution of risk reduction projects in buildings they operate. Federal agencies must identify and take appropriate action to eliminate hazards and regulatory noncompliance.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SETHY TONY SEAM

From Davidson County

No. 82A14

ORDER

The Court, on its own motion, orders that the parties submit supplemental briefs on the effect of *Montgomery v. Louisiana,*No. 14-280, 2016 WL 280768 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2016, revised Jan. 27, 2016), on the proceedings in this case. The State’s supplemental brief shall be filed no later than thirty days after the date of this order, and defendant’s supplemental brief shall be filed no later than thirty days following the State’s filing.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 28th day of January, 2016.

s/Ervin. J.

For the Court

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 29th day of January, 2016.

CHRISTIE SPEIR CAMERON Clerk of the Supreme Court

s/M.C. Hacknev Assistant Clerk
# Comments on: 22-1812: KAETZ v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38251-38254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15437]



[[Page 38251]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00-41]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104-164 dated 21 July 
1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 00-41 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: June 13, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[[Page 38252]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN20JN00.012


[[Page 38253]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN20JN00.013


[[Page 38254]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN20JN00.014

[FR Doc. 00-15437 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
#### § 301-71.301 In situations where a lodging facility requires the payment of a deposit, may we reimburse an employee for an advance room deposit prior to the beginning of scheduled official travel?

Yes, you may reimburse an employee an advance room deposit, when such a deposit is required by the lodging facility to secure a room reservation, prior to the beginning of an employee's scheduled official travel. However, if the employee is reimbursed the advance room deposit, but fails to perform the scheduled official travel for reasons not acceptable to the agency, resulting in the forfeit of the deposit, the employee is indebted to the Government and must repay that amount in a timely manner as prescribed by you.

[FTR Amdt. 108, 67 FR 57967, Sept. 13, 2002]
§ 102-192.50 What payment processes are we required to use? ( a ) You must pay the USPS using one or more of the following: ( 1 ) The U.S. Treasury Intergovernmental Payment and Collection Payment (IPAC) process associated with the Official Mail Accounting System (OMAS);
( 2 ) The USPS Centralized Account Processing System (CAPS) associated with commercial payments; or
( 3 ) Another Treasury approved means of paying the USPS.
( b ) Payments made to service providers other than USPS must be made by U.S. Treasury payment methods such as automated clearing house-electronic funds transfer, or another Treasury approved means of paying the vendor.
320P15

#### Leroy Courtland Broadnax v. Jason Edward Ramey, Attorney for the State

Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Motion for Relief from Conviction and Sentence (COAP16-584)

Dismissed
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4191 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 628
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4191

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

           September 26 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                Reported by Mr. Glenn, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 9630 
   Estate Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ``Aubrey C. 
                         Ottley Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 9630 Estate 
Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Aubrey C. Ottley Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Aubrey C. Ottley Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 628

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4191

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 9630 
   Estate Thomas in Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands, as the ``Aubrey C. 
                         Ottley Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 26 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 797 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 797

   To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to exempt disabled 
 individuals from being required to enroll with a managed care entity 
                      under the Medicaid Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1999

Mr. Lucas of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                      to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to exempt disabled 
 individuals from being required to enroll with a managed care entity 
                      under the Medicaid Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS FROM REQUIRED ENROLLMENT 
              WITH A MANAGED CARE ENTITY UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM.

    (a) Amendment to the Social Security Act.--Section 1932(a)(2) of 
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396u-2(a)(2)) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Exemption of disabled individuals.--A State 
                may not require under paragraph (1) the enrollment in a 
                managed care entity of an individual who is disabled 
                (as determined under section 1614(a)(3)).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
on and after the date of the enactment of this Act. In the case of 
individuals described in section 1932(a)(2)(D) of the Social Security 
Act (as added by subsection (a)) who are enrolled in a managed care 
entity pursuant to section 1932(a)(1)(A)(i) of such Act as of such 
date, such individuals may disenroll from such entity on and after such 
date.
                                 <all>
```
# Comments on: 21-1460: POTTER v. DVA [OPINION], Nonprecedential
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2011

- 1091 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2011

-NM

- 037

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

2.0 $ 170.00 $ 170.00 

### 7 $1,190.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in comp liance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,190 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Conditio**  **n Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

12.0 $1,020.00 $1,087 $2,107.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flex ibility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it ap propriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
<TABLE>                                                           EXHIBIT 11



          AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              (In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)

<CAPTION>
                                 Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                     September 30,       September 30,
                                         1997                 1997

<S>                              <C>                 <C>
1. Net Income ..................           $435,532         $1,471,301

2. Reported earnings per share:                                      

    a.  Average number of common        
        shares outstanding during 
        the period ..............           649,009            645,716


    b.  Reported earnings per 
        share (1/2a) .............            $0.67              $2.28


3. Primary earnings per share:  

    a.  Average number of common
        shares outstanding during 
        the period ...............          649,009            645,716
  
    b.  Common shares deemed
        outstanding from the  
        assumed exercise of stock 
        options reduced by the  
        number of common shares 
        purchased with the proceeds
        (determined using the average 
        market price during the 
        period)....................          15,557            14,446
        
    c.  Deferred contingent common 
        stock awards ..............             494               494
                                                                       
    d.  Shares for primary earnings 
        per share calculation 
        (3a+3b+3c) ................         665,060           660,656
  
    e.  Primary earnings per share   
        (1/3d).....................           $0.65             $2.23


4.  Fully diluted earnings per share:

    a.  Average number of common 
        shares outstanding during 
        the period.................         649,009           645,716
        
    b.  Common shares deemed 
        outstanding from the assumed 
        exercise of stock options 
        reduced by the number of 
        common shares purchased 
        with the proceeds 
        (determined using the higher 
        of the average market price 
        during the period 
        or the market price at the 
        end of the period) .........         15,557             15,191
  
    c.  Deferred contingent common 
        stock awards ...............            494                494


    d.  Shares for fully diluted
        earnings per share 
        calculation (4a+4b+4c)......        665,060            661,401

    e.  Fully diluted earnings per 
        share (1/4d) ...............          $0.65              $2.22
        
</TABLE)


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) of
Warner Communications Inc. (WCI) and American Television and Communications
Corporation (ATC) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
the undersigned officers of each of WCI and ATC certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his respective knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of each of
WCI and ATC.

Dated: May 15, 2003
    

/s/          Richard
D. ParsonsRichard D. Parsons
Chief Executive Officer
Warner Communications Inc.
American Television and Communications CorporationDated: May 15, 2003
    

/s/          Wayne
H. PaceWayne H. Pace
Chief Financial Officer
Warner Communications Inc.
American Television and Communications Corporation


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to each of WCI and ATC and will be retained by each of them and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 242.3 References. The references in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section may be obtained from USACE Pub. Depot, CEIM-SP-D, 2803 52d Avenue, Hyattsville, MD 20781-1102. ( a ) Section 321, Public Law 101-640, 74 Stat. 500 (33 U.S.C. 709a).
( b ) Corps of Engineers Engineering Regulation 1105-2-100, Planning Guidance Notebook.
( c ) Corps of Engineers Engineering Pamphlet 37-1-4, Cost of Doing Business.