alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
501 P.2d 955

#### Joel Leighton HOWARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Arizona, and Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, Appellees.

No. 2 CA-CIV 1131.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Oct. 17, 1972.

*328Joel Leighton Howard, in pro. per.

Gary K. Nelson, Atty. Gen., Phoenix, by John S. O’Dowd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tucson, for appellee.

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a summary dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking to quash a Texas detainer warrant filed with the Arizona State Prison.

The undisputed facts giving rise to this appeal are set forth in appellant’s petition and the State’s response. Briefly, they are as follows. On May 13, 1969, appellant was in the custody of the sheriff of Guadalupe County, Seguin, Texas, occasioned by an alleged traffic violation. Upon his conviction and sentence to a jail term, Texas initiated parole revocation proceedings. On June 5, 1969, pursuant to an extradition request by Arizona, a Governor’s Warrant issued out of the office of the Governor of the State of Texas. In compliance with this warrant, the sheriff of Seguin delivered appellant to the custody of the Maricopa County sheriff on June 19, 1969. On July 21, 1969, Texas authorities lodged a detainer warrant with the sheriff of Maricopa County for the alleged parole violation. Subsequently, appellant was convicted of attempted robbery, receiving a sentence of not less than twelve nor more than fifteen years. *See,*State v. Howard, 106 Ariz. 403, 476 P.2d 858 (1970).

Because appellant was imprisoned in the Arizona State Prison by reason of this sentence, the Texas Department of Corrections on February 24, 1970, filed a detainer with the Superintendent of Prisons.

The gravamen of appellant’s complaint that the petition should not be dismissed without a hearing is that the detainer warrant issued by the Texas authorities is unlawful because Texas relinquished custody and jurisdiction over appellant to Arizona. Appellant overlooks the fact, however, that the detainer under attack here was not the cause of the imprisonment or restraint. He is imprisoned by reason of his Maricopa County sentence. *See,*Atkins v. State ex rel. Eyman, 15 Ariz.App. 364, 488 P.2d 1001 (1971).

 The function of a habeas corpus proceeding under A.R.S. § 13-2001 et seq. is to obtain the release of one unlawfully detained. State v. Abbott, 103 Ariz. 336, 442 P.2d 80 (1968) ; Leonard v. Eyman, 1 Ariz.App. 593, 405 P.2d 903 (1965). When it is apparent from the face of the petition that a petitioner is not entitled to relief, the trial court is correct in denying the petitioner a hearing. Witt v. State ex rel. Eyman, 18 Ariz.App. 120, 500 P.2d 905 (1972) ; Landers v. State ex rel. Eyman, 7 Ariz.App. 197, 437 P.2d 681 (1969). Such is the case here.

Judgment affirmed.

HATHAWAY and HOWARD, JJ., concur.
#### § 102-41.110 Are transfers of voluntarily abandoned personal property reimbursable?

No, all transfers of voluntarily abandoned personal property will be without reimbursement. However, you may charge the recipient agency all costs you incurred in storing, packing, loading, preparing for shipment, and transporting the property.
No. 11-9378.

#### Duma *v.*Fannie Mae et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 301-11.8 What is the maximum per diem rate I will receive if lodging is not available at my TDY location?

If lodging is not available at your TDY location, your agency may authorize or approve the maximum per diem rate for the location where lodging is obtained.
#### § 302-10.5 May I transport a mobile home over water?

Yes, you may transport a mobile home over water when both the points of origin and destination are within CONUS or Alaska.
#### § 301-52.23 Is the additional fee, which is equal to any late payment charge that the card contractor would have been able to charge had I not paid the bill, considered income?

Yes, your agency will report this payment as additional wages on Form W-2.

[FTR Amdt. 90, 65 FR 3056, Jan. 19, 2000]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00556-CV

No. 04-13-00557-CV

The STATE of Texas, FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF L.G.

From the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2013MH2278 & 2013MH2254

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding1

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment for courtordered temporary mental health services and its order to compel psychoactive medications are 

AFFIRMED. 

No costs are assessed against appellant because she is indigent.

SIGNED December 18, 2013.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

1 The Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer is the presiding judge of Probate Court No. 1 of Bexar County, Texas, and 

Judge Spencer signed the two orders that are the subject of this appeal. However, Associate Judge Oscar Kazen 

presided over the hearing on the application for temporary commitment and the petition for order to compel 

psychoactive medication.
J~'CED STq l

~

S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

W WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

o 

Q k 0 

q< PROS ~G~ ? 

S E P 2 2 2009 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

J.R. Stroble 

Acting Director, National TRU Program 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

This letter approves the Tier 1(T1) change to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA)'s baseline approval of the Central Characterization Project (CCP)'s Remote-Handled 

(RH) transuranic (TRU) waste characterization (WC) program at the Idaho National Laboratory 

(INL). This T1 evaluation consisted of visual examination technique (VET) for RH TRU waste at 

INL-CCP for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). 

In July 2009, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) verbally requested EPA evaluate and 

approve the VET for RH TRU waste as a T1 change. On August 11, 2009, EPA performed the 

T1 evaluation and found the requested change technically adequate to characterize RH TRU 

debris (S5000), solid/sludge (S3000), and soils/gravel (S4000) waste categories at INL. 

If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Lindsey Bender at (202) 

343-9479. 

Sincerely, 

1 v'rl 

Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Enclosure 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Electronic Distribution 

Alton Harris, DOE HQ 

Vernon Daub, CBFO 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO 

Ava Holland, CBFO 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO 

Steve Zappe, NMED 

D K Ploetz, WTS-CCP 

Mike Sensibaugh, WTS-CCP 

Allison Pangle, CTAC 

Wayne Ledford, CTAC
#### § 50-201.701 Definition of “person.”

Whenever used in the regulations in this part, the word *person* includes one or more individuals, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers.

[1 FR 1627, Sept. 19, 1936. Redesignated at 24 FR 10952, Dec. 30, 1959]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Stephanie A. Casey, of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendants Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen, and requests that all 

papers served in this case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Dated: January 25, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Stephanie Casey

Stephanie A. Casey

Florida Bar No. 97483

Email: scasey@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendants Thomas Brady

 and Gisele Bündchen 

Case 1:22-cv-23983-KMM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-118.620 How will a TSP know if the GSA Transportation Audits Division disallows a claim?

The GSA Transportation Audits Division will furnish a GSA Form 7932, Settlement Certificate, to the TSP explaining the disallowance.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32326, May 31, 2022]
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**RULE 13a-14(b) CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code ) each of the undersigned officers of National Grid plc, a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the “Company”),hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ending March 31, 2012 (the“Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

12 June 2012 

/s/ Steve Holliday 

Steve Holliday 

Title: Chief Executive 

National Grid plc 

12 June2012 

/s/ Andrew Bonfield 

Andrew Bonfield 

Title: Finance Director 

National Grid plc
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40883

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS TREJO-PALOMEQUE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-00-CR-143-1

--------------------

April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesus Trejo-Palomeque appeals the 46-month sentence imposed

following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the

United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his

increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of

the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.

Trejo-Palomeque acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed

by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue
No. 00-40883

-2-

for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). TrejoPalomeque’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
§ 105-55.026 Suspending or terminating collection activity. ( a ) The standards set forth in §§ 105-55.027 and 105-55.028 apply to the suspension or termination of collection activity pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3711 on debts that do not exceed $100,000, or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, after deducting the amount of partial payments or collections, if any. Prior to referring a debt to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for litigation, the General Services Administration (GSA) may suspend or terminate collection under this part with respect to debts arising out of activities of, or referred or transferred for collection services to, the Agency.
( b ) If, after deducting the amount of any partial payments or collections, the principal amount of a debt exceeds $100,000, or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, the authority to suspend or terminate rests solely with DOJ. If GSA believes suspension or termination of any debt in excess of $100,000 may be appropriate, the Agency will refer the debt to the Civil Division or other appropriate litigating division in DOJ, using the Claims Collection Litigation Report. The referral will specify the reasons for the Agency's recommendation. If, prior to referral to DOJ, GSA determines a debt is plainly erroneous or clearly without legal merit, the Agency may terminate collection activity regardless of the amount involved without obtaining DOJ concurrence.
#### § 304-9.3 May we pay an employee for expenses that are fully reimbursed by a donor for training in a non-Government facility, or travel expenses incident to attendance at a meeting?

No, you may not reimburse an employee for expenses that are fully reimbursed by a donor for training in a non-Government facility, or travel expenses incident to attendance at a meeting.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. EC00-75-000]

Take notice that on June 19, 2000, NiSource Inc. and Columbia Energy Group supplemented their merger filing of April 10, 2000, with additional materials for Exhibit G under Part 33 of the Commission's Regulations. 

Any person desiring to be heard or to protect such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before July 3, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 

David P. Boergers, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16271  Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
#### § 955.12 Submission without a hearing.

Submission of the case without hearing does not relieve the parties from the necessity of proving the facts supporting their allegations or defenses. Affidavits, depositions, admissions, answers to interrogatories, and stipulations may be employed to supplement other documentary evidence in the record which will be settled pursuant to § 955.14. The Board may permit such submission to be supplemented by oral argument (transcribed if requested), and by briefs in accordance with § 955.24.
§ 105-8.152 Program accessibility: Assignment of space. ( a ) When GSA assigns or reassigns space to an agency, it shall consult with the agency to ensure that the assignment or reassignment will not result in one or more of the agency's programs or activities being inaccessible to individuals with handicaps.
( b ) Prior to the assignment or reassignment of space to an agency, GSA shall inform the agency of the accessibility, and/or the absence of accessibility features, of the space in which GSA intends to locate the agency. If the agency informs GSA that the use of the space will result in one or more of the agency's programs being inaccessible, GSA shall take one or more of the following actions to make the programs accessible: ( 1 ) Arrange for alterations, improvements, and repairs to buildings and facilities;
( 2 ) Locate and provide alternative space that will not result in one or more of the agency's programs being inaccessible; or
( 3 ) Take any other actions that result in making this agency's programs accessible. The responsibility for payment to make the physical changes in the space shall be assigned on a case-by-case basis as agreed to by GSA and the user agency, dependent on individual circumstances.
( c ) GSA may not require the agency to accept space that results in one or more of the agency's programs being inaccessible.
EXHIBIT 21.1


List of Subsidiaries

Tanger Development Corporation

Tanger-Warren Development, LLC

TWMB Associates, LLC

Tanger Deer Park, LLC

Deer Park Enterprises, LLC

Tanger COROC, LLC

COROC Holdings, LLC

COROC/Riviera L.L.C.

COROC/Hilton Head I L.L.C.

COROC/Hilton Head II L.L.C.

COROC/Lincoln City L.L.C.

COROC/Myrtle Beach L.L.C.

COROC/Park City L.L.C.

COROC/Rehoboth I L.L.C.

COROC/Rehoboth II L.L.C.

COROC/Rehoboth III L.L.C.

COROC/Lakes Region L.L.C.

COROC/Tilton L.L.C.

COROC/Tuscola L.L.C.

COROC/Westbrook I L.L.C.

COROC/Westbrook II L.L.C.

Tanger Devco, LLC
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Amendment No. 2 for the Annual Report of Gilla
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period
ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ashish Kapoor,
Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
 The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information
contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Gilla
Inc.Date:
July 20, 2018
By:
/s/
Ashish KapoorName:
Ashish KapoorTitle:
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 302-9.174 What is the “authorized point of origin” when I transport a POV, including a replacement POV, to my post of duty subsequent to the time of my assignment to that post of duty?

Your agency determines the authorized point of origin within the United States when you transport a POV, including a replacement POV, to your post of duty subsequent to the time of your assignment to that post of duty.
#### § 302-2.16 Must I provide my agency with my actual place of residence as soon as I accept a transfer/appointment OCONUS?

Yes, if you accept a transfer/appointment to an OCONUS location, you must immediately provide your agency with the information needed to determine your actual place of residence and to document it into your service agreement.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2014-01, 79 FR 49644, Aug. 21, 2014]
#### § 302-16.101 May I receive an advance of funds for MEA?

No, your agency must not authorize an advance of funds for MEA.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 38838)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee, Standing Review Committee, NIDCR.                    

*Date:*                         June 22-23, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Gaithersburg Hilton, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 20877.                    

*Contact Person:*                         William J. Gartland, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Section, National Institute of Dental Research, National Institutes of Health, PHS, DHHS, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2372.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 14, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-15740 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M