alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0020 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-SW-107-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16353]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration 
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain 
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is 
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory 
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the 
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

Lake Superior Railroad Museum

[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-1999-6072]

    Lake Superior Railroad Museum of Duluth, Minnesota, is requesting a 
waiver from the requirements of 49 CFR Part 223, Safety Glazing 
Standards, for Great Northern locomotive #192 which was built in 1946. 
This locomotive has FRA Type II glazing in all side facing locations 
and is partially equipped with FRA Type I glazing in end facing 
locations. The remainder of the end facing glazing is identified as 
``shatterproof.''
    This locomotive is primarily used on 26 miles of the North Shore 
Scenic Railroad between Duluth and Two Harbors, Minnesota.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings 
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate 
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since 
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party 
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in 
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for 
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the 
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number 1999-
6072) and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT Docket Management 
Facility, Room PL-401 (Plaza Level), 400 7th Street, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20590. Communications received within 45 days of the date of this 
notice will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments 
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All 
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for 
examination during regular business hours (9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.) at the 
above facility. All documents in the public docket are also available 
for inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's web 
site at http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on June 22, 2000.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 00-16353 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Northeast Dairy Compact Commission

# AGENCY:

Northeast Dairy Compact Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Compact Commission will hold its regular monthly meeting to consider matters relating to administration and enforcement of the price regulation, including the reports and recommendations of the Commission's standing Committees.

# DATES:

The meeting will begin at 10:30 a.m. on Wednesday, July 12, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at The Wayfarer Inn, 121 S. River Road, U.S. Route 3, Bedford, New Hampshire. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kenneth M. Becker, Executive Director, Northeast Dairy Compact Commission, 34 Barre Street, Suite 2, Montpelier, VT 05602. Telephone (802) 229-1941. 

Authority:7 U.S.C. 7256. 

Dated: June 20, 2000. 

Kenneth M. Becker, 

Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-16035 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1650-01-P
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: 7/31/2015 TO: C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Mi ke Gordon , EPA Region 3 SUBJECT: 6 / 12 /15 Meeting with Region 3 State Secretaries **SUMMARY** On June 12 , 2015 EPA attended a meeting with the State Secretaries or representatives from Region 3 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants . The C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES** Mike Gordon, EPA Region 3 Dave Arnold , EPA Region 3 Shawn Garvin , EPA Region 3
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2852-000]


Central Power and Light Company, West Texas Utilities Company, 
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Southwestern Electric Power 
Company; Notice of Filing

June 19, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 14, 2000, Central Power and Light Company 
(CPL), West Texas Utilities Company (WTU), Public Service Company of 
Oklahoma (PSO), and Southwestern Electric Power Company (SWEPCO) 
(collectively, the CSW Operating Companies) tendered for filing a 
notice pursuant to the Commission's order issued on May 8, 2000 in the 
matter of North American Electric Reliability Council, docket No. ER00-
1666-000, stating that: (1) They use the North American Electric 
Reliability Council's revised Transmission Loading Relief procedures; 
and (2) their open access transmission service tariff shall be 
considered so modified. The TLR procedures will apply to those portions 
of the CSW Operating Companies' transmission systems that are located 
in the Eastern Interconnection.
    The CSW Operating Companies request an effective date of March 1, 
2000 for the TLR procedures, and therefore respectfully request waiver 
of the Commission's notice requirements.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before July 5, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16015 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-9532.

#### McCoy *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00029-CR

Lamont Alva Scrutchens, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 16-3308-K277, THE HONORABLE STACEY MATHEWS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Lamont Alva Scrutchens was charged with the offense of aggravated 

robbery. See Tex. Penal Code § 29.03. Appellant pleaded guilty and judicially confessed to the 

offense, and the trial court placed him on deferred adjudication community supervision for ten

years. The State twice moved to revoke appellant’s community supervision and to adjudicate his 

guilt based on alleged violations of the terms of his community supervision. After the first 

motion to adjudicate, the trial court amended the conditions of his community supervision. After 

the second motion to adjudicate, appellant pleaded “true” to some of the alleged violations of the 

terms of his community supervision, and the trial court adjudicated him guilty of the offense and 

assessed punishment at twenty years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported 

by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 
2

requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record 

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);

Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75, 86-87 (1988).

Appellant’s counsel has represented to the Court that she has provided copies of 

the motion and brief to appellant; advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record 

and file a pro se response; and provided appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the 

appellate record along with the mailing address of this Court. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 

313, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d 

at 766. Although appellant requested and received the appellate record and additional time to 

file a pro se response, that time has run and no pro se brief has been filed.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellate 

counsel’s brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 

766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel 

that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court’s judgment adjudicating 

guilt is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Affirmed

Filed: August 26, 2022

Do Not Publish
# Comments on: 21-1747: MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE v. US [OPINION], Precedential
§ 302-11.201 When may my reimbursement for loan assumption fees or other similar fees exceed the 1 percent as specified in § 302-11.200(f)(2)? Reimbursement may exceed 1 percent (as specified in § 302-11.200(f)(2) only when you provide evidence that the higher rate: ( a ) Does not include prepaid interest, points, or a mortgage discount; and
( b ) Is customarily charged in the locality where the residence is located.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned executive officer of Pittsburgh Financial Corp. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

                                             /s/ Michael J. Kirk
                                             --------------------------------
                                             Name: Michael J. Kirk
                                             Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 19, 2002
No. 10-10996.

#### Zackary *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 50-205.7 Manual of instructions.

The Director shall provide the State agency with a manual of instructions which shall be used in the making of inspections.

(41 U.S.C. 40; 5 U.S.C. 556)

[32 FR 7704, May 26, 1967]
Exhibit 15 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (No. 333-33094, 333-65968, 333-97249, 333-103768, 333-107727,333-149828, 333-155527, 333-170716, 333-175852, 333-184558) and Form F-3ASR (No. 333-205710) of National Grid plc of our report dated May 17, 2017 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which appears in this Form 20-F. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

London, United Kingdom 

June 6, 2017.
#### § 105-50.001-2 Political subdivision or local government.

*Political subdivision* or *local government* means a local unit of government, including specifically a county, municipality, city, town, township, or a school or other special district created by or pursuant to State law.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________

)

CARL PARKER, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 17-2834 (PLF)

) 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF )

AGRICULTURE, )

) 

Defendant. )

___________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that the government’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to 

state a claim upon which relief can be granted [Dkt. No. 12] is GRANTED pursuant to Rule 

12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ re-petition for mandamus action to 

compel a formal hearing, the removal of a lien, or other review of the monitor’s decision denying 

a formal hearing [Dkt. No. 13] is DENIED; it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for discovery [Dkt. No. 20] is 

DENIED as moot; and it is
2

FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is 

directed to close this case.

This is a final appealable order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a). 

SO ORDERED.

 PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

 United States District Judge

DATE: September 11, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4266 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4266

 To expand the boundaries of the Stones River National Battlefield in 
                   Tennessee, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1994

  Mr. Gordon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the boundaries of the Stones River National Battlefield in 
                   Tennessee, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF BATTLEFIELD

    The Act entitled ``An Act to amend the boundaries of Stones River 
National Battlefield, Tennessee, and for other purposes'', approved 
December 23, 1987 (101 Stat. 1433; 16 U.S.C. 426n) is amended by 
striking in the first sentence of section 1(a) ``numbered 327/80,004B, 
and dated November 1991'' and inserting ``numbered -------- and dated 
-------------- 1994''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out the purposes of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### § 60-30.38 Severability.

Should a court of competent jurisdiction hold any provision(s) of this part to be invalid, such action will not affect any other provision of this part.

[88 FR 51735, Aug. 4, 2023]
#### § 60-300.81 Access to records.

Each contractor shall permit access during normal business hours to its places of business for the purpose of conducting on-site compliance evaluations and complaint investigations and inspecting and copying such books, accounts, and records, including electronic records, and any other material OFCCP deems relevant to the matter under investigation and pertinent to compliance with the Act or this part. Contractors must also provide OFCCP access to these materials, including electronic records, off-site for purposes of conducting compliance evaluations and complaint investigations. Upon request, the contractor must provide OFCCP information about all format(s), including specific electronic formats, in which the contractor maintains its records and other information. The contractor must provide records and other information in any of the formats in which they are maintained, as selected by OFCCP. Information obtained in this manner shall be used only in connection with the administration of the Act and in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. OFCCP will treat records provided by the contractor to OFCCP under this section as confidential to the maximum extent the information is exempt from public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16348]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: National Council on Disability (NCD).

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule of the forthcoming meeting 
for NCD's Youth Advisory Committee. Notice of this meeting is required 
under Section 10(a)(1)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463).

YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE: The purpose of NCD's Youth Advisory Committee 
is to provide input into NCD activities consistent with the values and 
goals of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

DATES: July 25, 2000, 2:45 p.m.-5:00 p.m. EDT.
    Location: 1331 F. Street, NW, 3rd Floor Conference Room, 
Washington, DC.
    For Youth Advisory Committee Information, Contact: Gerrie Drake 
Hawkins, Ph.D., Program Specialist, National Council on Disability, 
1331 F Street NW, Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004 
(Voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 202-272-2022 (Fax), ghawkins @ncd.gov (e-
mail).
    Agency Mission: The National Council on Disability is an 
independent federal agency composed of 15 members appointed by the 
President of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Its 
overall purpose is to promote policies, programs, practices, and 
procedures that guarantee equal opportunity for all people with 
disabilities, regardless of the nature of severity of the disability; 
and to empower people with disabilities to achieve economic self-
sufficiency, independent living, and inclusion and integration into all 
aspects of society.
    This committee is necessary to provide advice and recommendations 
to NCD on disability issues.
    We currently have a membership reflecting our nation's diversity 
and representing a variety of disabling conditions from across the 
United States.
    Open Meeting: This advisory committee meeting of the National 
Council on Disability will be open to the public. Those interested in 
joining the meeting should contact the appropriate staff member listed 
above. Space is limited.
    Records will be kept of all Youth Advisory Committee meetings calls 
and will be available after the meeting for public inspection at the 
National Council on Disability.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on June 23, 2000.
Ethel D. Briggs,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 00-16348 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-M
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,940-01

SHANTA RENCHIE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1537886-A

IN THE 337TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., concurred.

O P I N I O N

Applicant pleaded guilty to of delivery of a controlled substance and was sentenced pursuant

to Section 12.44(a) of the Texas Penal Code to ninety days’ imprisonment in county jail. Applicant

filed this application for writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that she was denied due process and that her plea was involuntary

because she did not know of the bad acts of the officer who implicated her in this alleged offense. 

The State and the trial court agree that the presumptively false evidence used to justify the arrest of

Applicant was material, and that her plea was involuntary. Ex parte Mathews, 638 S.W.3d 685 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2022); Ex parte Coty, 418 S.W.3d 597 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The State and the trial

court both recommend granting relief. We agree. Applicant is entitled to relief. 

Relief is granted. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970). The judgment in Cause No.

153788601010 in the 337th Judicial District Court of Harris County is set aside, and Applicant is

remanded to the Harris County Sheriff to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial

court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: AUGUST 23, 2023

Do Not Publish