alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Patrick Evans, Chief Executive Officer of Mountain Province
Diamonds Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Annual Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:    | /s/ Patrick Evans      
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Patrick Evans          
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  | March 26, 2014         



This written statement is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of
this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this
Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### § 302-3.224 If I violate my new service agreement, will the Government reimburse me for return travel and transportation to my actual place of residence?

If you violate your new service agreement, the Government will reimburse you for return travel and transportation to your actual place of residence only if you did not receive all of your allowances under a previous service agreement in which you successfully completed your required period of service. The Government will then authorize you reimbursement cost for return travel and transportation expenses from your former post of duty to your actual place of residence. If there is any additional cost you must pay the difference.
#### § 60-30.28 Exceptions to recommended decisions.

Within 14 days after receipt of the recommended findings, conclusions, and decision, any party may submit exceptions to said recommendation. These exceptions may be responded to by other parties within 14 days of their receipt by said parties. All exceptions and responses shall be filed with the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor. Service of such briefs or exceptions and responses shall be made simultaneously on all parties to the proceeding. Requests to the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, for additional time in which to file exceptions and responses shall be in writing and copies shall be served simultaneously on other parties. Requests for extensions must be received no later than 3 days before the exceptions are due.

[61 FR 19988, May 3, 1996]
No. 11-9242.

#### Landon *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CRESCENZO HOLDINGS, LLC; )

DEMETER PROPERTIES, INC.; )

HEIDI BEHRENDT; and DYLAN )

ARNOLD, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2051

)

1000 CHANNELSIDE )

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, )

INC., a Florida Corporation, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed June 5, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Paul L. Huey, 

Judge.

Ann M. Allison of Allison Law Group, 

Temple Terrace, for Appellants.

David J. Lopez of James R. DeFurio, 

P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and KELLY and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
#### § 60-300.85 Severability.

Should a court of competent jurisdiction hold any provision(s) of this part to be invalid, such action will not affect any other provision of this part.

[88 FR 51736, Aug. 4, 2023; 88 FR 57009, Aug. 22, 2023]
# Comments on: 22-2081: RODRIGUEZ v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION], Nonprecedential
§ 95.001 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to establish under the influence of alcohol or a dangerous drug standards under 46 U.S.C. 2302 and to prescribe restrictions and responsibilities for personnel on vessels inspected, or subject to inspection, under Chapter 33 of Title 46 United States Code. This part does not pre-empt enforcement by a State of its applicable laws and regulations concerning operating a recreational vessel while under the influence of alcohol or a dangerous drug.
( b ) Nothing in this part shall be construed as limiting the authority of a vessel's marine employer to limit or prohibit the use or possession of alcohol on board a vessel.
[CGD 84-099, 52 FR 47532, Dec. 14, 1987, as amended by USCG-1998-4593, 66 FR 1862, Jan. 10, 2001]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5309

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

2305 Minton Road in West Melbourne, Florida, as the ‘‘Ronald W.

Reagan Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 2000

Mr. WELDON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 2305 Minton Road in West Melbourne, Florida, as the ‘‘Ronald W. Reagan Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RONALD W. REAGAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

5 Postal Service located at 2305 Minton Road in West Mel6 bourne, Florida, shall be known and designated as the

7 ‘‘Ronald W. Reagan Post Office Building’’.

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United
2

•HR 5309 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Ronald W. Reagan

3 Post Office Building.

Æ
Page 1 of 1 

Docket Index 

EPA-R10-OAR-2010-0433 

DOC # DATE FROM TO SUBJECT 

1 10/5/2010 Chris Hall, EPA Claudia Vaupel, EPA Memorandum: Eagle River PM10 Attain2 5/24/1995 Jon W. Schweiss, EPA Garry Guay, ADEC Letter regarding review of special event s3 9/1994 Guideline on the Identification and Hand

Data Affected by Special Events or Spec94-001) 

4 6/1987 PM10 SIP Development Guideline (EPA-5 4/1987 Guideline on Exceptions to Data Require

Attainment of Particulate Matter Standar

6 5/1/1995 Steve Morris, Anchorage Air 

Pollution Control Agency 

Christy Lee, EPA PM-10 Data Capture Gap 

7 10/5/2010 Air Quality System, Raw Data Report, E8 10/6/2010 Claudia Vaupel, EPA Docket EPA-R10-OAR2010-0433 Note to File on Monitoring Site Name 9 11/9/2009 Mahbubul Islam, EPA Barbara Trost Letter regarding approval of the Alaska 2

10 10/7/2010 Dennis J. McLerran Signed Federal Register Direct Final Rul
Exhibit 4.40


 


Summary
of the Rural Partnership Agreement, entered into on March 11, 2019, in connection with Fazenda Araucária 


 


Parties:
BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, as the current company vested in the possession of the
land, Marinho Endres de Quadros, as the individual interested in entering into a rural partnership with BrasilAgro – Companhia
Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, and Imobiliária Araucária Ltda., as the owner of the land.


 


Purpose: Granting
of the possession, for a one-year-term, of a total area equivalent to 357.98 useful hectares, which comprises the plots of land
nos. 18, 21 and 22 of Fazenda Araucária for purposes of the exploitation of the land under a rural partnership regime,
by means of the sharing, by and among the parties, of the earnings received from the crops/harvests arising from the aforementioned
partnership. Mr. Marinho Endres de Quadros shall be entitled to five bags of sorghum per hectare,
and BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas shall
be entitled to the remainder of the production.
#### § 302-9.401 Where may I store my POV if I receive notice to evacuate my immediate family and/or household goods from my post of duty?

If you receive notice to evacuate your immediate family and/or HHG for your post of duty, you may store your POV at a place determined to be reasonable by your agency whether the POV is already located at, or being transported to, your post of duty.
13 April 2016

013P16

#### Landover Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Thomas B. Sanders; Anna B. Sanders; Sanders Equipment Company, Inc.; and Sanders Development

1. Defs’ Motion for Temporary Stay (COA14-1337)

1. Allowed 01/15/2016

Dissolved 04/13/2016

2. Defs’ Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Denied

3. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Denied
Stats of IUR Database Queries Requested for the

Economic Analysis for the IUR Modification Rule

1. Issue: Reduce or Eliminate the Threshold for Downstream Processing and 

Use Reporting (FR 710.52(c) to levels of 100,000 lbs., 50,000 lbs, or 25,000 lbs.

Statistic Mfg + Imp 

Volume

>= 300,000 lbs

Mfg + Imp 

Volume

>= 100,000 lbs

Mfg + Imp 

Volume

>= 50,000 lbs

Mfg + Imp 

Volume

>= 25,000 lbs

# of Reports 17,075 20,702 23,163 25,896

# of Companies 1,360 1,466 1,506 1,530

# of Sites 3,517 3,811 3,978 4,085

# of Chemicals 3,689 4,809 5,470 6,149

# Reports = Total number of data lines for desired ranges

# Companies = Unique Formal Names for desired ranges

# Sites = Unique IUR report numbers for desired ranges

# Chemicals = Unique chemical numbers for desired ranges

2. Issue: Change the Timeframe for Reporting (CFR 710.52(c)(3))

List of chemical/site combinations that appeared in the 1998 database but not the 

2002 database. Include 1998 production volume. Total Number: 19,307 +

List of chemical/site combinations that appeared in the 2002 database but not the 

2006 database. Include 2002 production volume. Total Number:

3. Issue: Excessive CBI claims for Downstream Processing and Use (DPU)

2006 Information:

# of Reports Providing Any Processing and Use Information 21,334

# of CBI Claims for Site ID in 2006 1,547

Statistic Claimed CBI Claimed NRO

# of Reports 8,133 10,220

# of Companies 396 756

# of Discrete Chemicals 2,724 1,942

# Reports = Total number of data lines for desired value

# Companies = Unique Formal Names for desired value

# Chemicals = Unique chemical numbers for desired value

4. Issue: Chemical Exemption for Manufactured Water

# of Reports Submitted in 2006 43

# of Sites That Submitted in 2006 43

# of Companies That Submitted in 2006 34
Used 7732-18-5 as the chemical identifying number for the search

# Reports = Total number of data lines for desired ranges

# Sites = Unique IUR report numbers for desired ranges

# Companies = Unique Formal Names for desired ranges

5. Issue: Site-limited (CFR 710.52(c)(3))

# and % of Reports Site-limited in 2006 3,910 14.8%

# and % of Companies Site-limited in 2006 495 12%

# and % of Discrete Chemicals Site-limited in 2006 1,393 22.4%

# Reports = Total number of data lines for desired value

# Companies = Unique Formal Names for desired value

# Chemicals = Unique chemical numbers for desired value
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1

101 NE 3rd Avenue, Suite 1700  Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Phone: 954.766.2812  Fax: 954.766.2805


Per-Olof Loof
Chief Executive Officer


July 7, 2015


Mr. Claudio Lollini


Dear Claudio,


As discussed with you, we are pleased to appoint you as Senior Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing, reporting to me.


It is understood that your work location will be based in Fort Lauderdale (FL). We will keep your current expatriate agreement in Hong Kong until July 2016; thereafter, you will be directly employed by KEMET USA.


Effective July 2015 your gross annual salary will be 265.000 USD, which will include all your current expat allowance in Hong Kong with the exception of housing.


Your KAIP FY16 (KEMET Annual Incentive Plan) bonus program will have a target bonus equal to 60% of your base salary. Your LTIP FY16-17 (KEMET Long Term Incentive Plan) will have a target expressed as 75% of your base salary.


As of the effective date of your promotion you will receive 100,000 RSUs (Restricted Stock Units) valued (for tax purposes) at the fair market value when they vest. Your RSUs will vest annually on the anniversary of each year following the date of Grant. The vesting schedule will be 33% in the first year, 33% in the second year and 34% in the third year. The RSU grant is subject to a standard non-compete commitment.


Once the relocation of your family is underway you will receive a bonus (gross) of 100.000 USD to cover the expenses you will encounter during your first year of residency in the USA. Your base salary will be elevated to 300.000 USD on January 1, 2016.


It is understood that the validity of this letter is submitted to the formal approval from the KEMET Board of Directors.


Best Regards,


/c/ Per Olof-Loof


Per Olof-Loof
#### §§ 51-10.152-51-10.159 [Reserved]
#### § 301-11.7 What determines my maximum per diem reimbursement rate?

Your TDY location determines your maximum per diem reimbursement rate. If you arrive at your lodging facility after 12 midnight, you claim lodging cost for the preceding calendar day. If no lodging is required, the applicable M&IE reimbursement rate is the rate for the TDY location. (See § 301-11.102.)

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15961, Apr. 1, 1998; 63 FR 35537, June 30, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-03, 76 FR 55275, Sept. 7, 2011]
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-122300, No. 333-68260, No. 333-49908 and No. 333-13975) of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated September 25, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements,which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

Beard Miller Company LLP 

Baltimore, Maryland 

September 25, 2009
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of S.P. and * From the 318th District Court

H.P., children, of Midland County,

Trial Court No. FM 56,186.

No. 11-14-00308-CV * May 7, 2015

* Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the order

of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
§ 302-17.68 What does my agency do once it has calculated my RITA under the two-year process? ( a ) Your RITA is likely to be different from the sum of the WTA(s) paid during Year 1, if any, because the WTA is calculated using a flat rate, established by the IRC, while the RITA is calculated using the CMTR. Therefore: ( 1 ) If the RITA calculation in § 302-17.67 results in a negative value (that is, if your agency's calculation shows that it withheld and reported too much money as income taxes), then your agency will report this result to you and will send you a bill for the difference, to repay the excess amount that it sent to the IRS on your behalf as withheld income taxes. The IRS will credit you for the full amount of withheld taxes, including the excess amount, when you file your income tax return for Year 1; therefore, you must repay the excess amount to your agency within 90 days, or within a time period set by your agency. If you are required to repay an amount in Year 2 that was included as wages on your W-2 in Year 1, you may be entitled to a miscellaneous itemized deduction on your Federal income tax return in Year 2. For more information, see IRS Publication 535, “Business Expenses.” If your agency chooses to offer you the choice, then you may want to decline the WTA to avoid this so-called “negative RITA” situation.
( 2 ) If the RITA calculation in § 302-17.67 results in a positive value (that is, if your agency's calculation shows that it did not withhold enough money as income taxes), then your agency will pay your RITA to you before the end of Year 2 and will report it to the IRS as part of your income for that year. Also, after your agency has paid your RITA to you, it will provide a W-2 that shows your RITA as taxable income to you.
( b ) At your agency's discretion, you may receive one W-2 that includes all of your taxable relocation expenses, WTA (if any), and RITA (if any), along with your regular payroll wages, or you may receive one W-2 for your regular payroll wages and a separate one for your taxable relocation expenses, WTA, and RITA.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 882 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 882

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To nullify any reservation of funds during fiscal year 1999 for 
guaranteed loans under the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act 
  for qualified beginning farmers or ranchers, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 882

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To nullify any reservation of funds during fiscal year 1999 for 
guaranteed loans under the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act 
  for qualified beginning farmers or ranchers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF RESERVATION OF FUNDS DURING FISCAL YEAR 
              1999 FOR GUARANTEED LOANS UNDER THE CONSOLIDATED FARM AND 
              RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACT FOR QUALIFIED BEGINNING FARMERS OR 
              RANCHERS.

    Amounts shall be made available pursuant to section 346(b)(1)(D) of 
the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act for guaranteed loans, 
without regard to any reservation under section 346(b)(2)(B) of such 
Act.

SEC. 2. QUALIFIED BEGINNING FARMERS AND RANCHERS TO BE GIVEN PRIORITY 
              IN MAKING GUARANTEED LOANS UNDER THE CONSOLIDATED FARM 
              AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACT FROM SUPPLEMENTAL 
              APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999.

    In making guaranteed loans under the Consolidated Farm and Rural 
Development Act from funds made available pursuant to any Act making 
supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 1999, the Secretary of 
Agriculture shall, to the extent practicable, give priority to making 
such loans to qualified beginning farmers and ranchers (as defined in 
section 343(a)(11) of such Act).

            Passed the House of Representatives March 2, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

1356 Ghent 1

1 6/8/2010 8:15 6/8/2010

2 6/8/2010 12:09 6/8/2010

3 6/8/2010 16:06 6/8/2010

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date
Measured Value 

(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used 

11:29 0.219 Dry Method 26A

15:27 [<0.105] Dry Method 26A

19:20 [<0.104] Dry Method 26A

Method 26A

Method 26A

Method 26A

Test End Time

Chlorine Emission Test Results
Data Flag (ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Test Method 

Comments

ADL 0.000601 3682.96 5083.95 14.92

BDL [<0.00029] 3763.85 5113.38 14.46

BDL [<0.00030] 3759.6 5083.48 15.06

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/mmBtu)

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

11.3 7.2 1323799 127 464880 bituminouslb/hour Other

11.4 7.3 1353712 128 471950 bituminouslb/hour Other

10.7 7.9 1329926 128 451730 bituminouslb/hour Other

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(F)

Fuel #1
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #2 Fuel #3
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel Input Rate is derived from coal feeder readings. 

Fuel Input Rate is derived from coal feeder readings. Detection Limi

Fuel Input Rate is derived from coal feeder readings. Detection Limi

Other Supporting Information

Fuel #4
l feeder readings. 

al feeder readings. Detection Limit Calculations attached to the 1356_Unit_1_ERT.mbd file.

al feeder readings. Detection Limit Calculations attached to the 1356_Unit_1_ERT.mbd file.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PUREPREDICTIVE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

H2O.AI, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2017-2544

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 3:17-cv-03049-

WHO, Judge William H. Orrick, III.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

PERRY S. CLEGG, Kunzler, P.C., Salt Lake City, UT, 

argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by 

ROBERT JEREMY ADAMSON, JUAN CARLOS MIJARES. 

 MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 

LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. 

Also represented by CLEMENT ROBERTS, San Francisco,

CA; LAURA MILLER, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA. 

 ______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (REYNA, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

 November 7, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 20, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 05-50100

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

ARTURO SALAS-SALAS

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso

---------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to

vacate the sentence is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand the case to the Western District of Texas, El Paso

Division for resentencing is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative request

for an extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 14 days
from the denial of Appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is

denied as moot.