alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDING AUGUST 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,783
<SECURITIES>                                     2,016
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (440)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,376
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,025
<PP&E>                                          22,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,126
<BONDS>                                          8,753
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,631
<COMMON>                                         2,103
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,493
<SALES>                                         12,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,034
<CGS>                                            8,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (924)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (327)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (597)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     369
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (228)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>ANTI-DILUTIVE
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40272

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CRISTOBAL SANCHEZ-PENA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:03-CR-22-1

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cristobal Sanchez-Pena (“Sanchez”) pleaded guilty to

illegally re-entering the United States after having been

deported, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and his sentence 

was enhanced pursuant to the “aggravated felony” provision in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). The district court sentenced him to 33

months in prison and to three years of supervised release. 

Sanchez contends that the district court erred by denying

his motion to suppress evidence of his deportation. He argues
No. 04-40272

-2-

that his 1998 deportation proceeding violated the Due Process

Clause because the immigration judge erroneously informed him

that he was ineligible for discretionary relief from deportation

under former § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act

(“INA”). Sanchez concedes that his contention is foreclosed by

this court’s case law, but he raises the claim to preserve it for

further review.

An immigration judge’s error in informing an alien of

eligibility for forms of discretionary relief under the INA does

not violate the alien’s right to due process. United States v.

Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 230-31 (5th Cir. 2002). The district

court did not err by denying Sanchez’s motion to suppress

evidence of his deportation. 

For the first time on appeal, Sanchez argues that 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466 (2000), because it does not require the fact of a

prior felony or aggravated-felony conviction to be charged in the

indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. As Sanchez

concedes, this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), and Almendarez-Torres was not

overruled by Apprendi. See United States v. Sarmiento-Funes,

374 F.3d 336, 346 (5th Cir. 2004).

Sanchez also argues that the Supreme Court’s holding in

Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), should be applied

to sentences determined under the United States Sentencing
No. 04-40272

-3-

Guidelines. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by this

court’s recent opinion in United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464,

465 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14,

2004) (No. 04-5263), but he raises it to preserve it for possible

further review.

AFFIRMED.
# Comments on: 21-2311: SOCLEAN, INC. v. SUNSET HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. [OPINION], Precedential
§ 102-36.340 What must we do when disposing of excess aircraft? ( a ) You must report to GSA all excess aircraft, regardless of condition or dollar value, and provide the following information on the SF 120: ( 1 ) Manufacturer, date of manufacture, model, serial number.
( 2 ) Major components missing from the aircraft, such as engines, electronics.
( 3 ) Whether or not the: ( i ) Aircraft is operational;
( ii ) Data plate is available;
( iii ) Historical and maintenance records are available;
( iv ) Aircraft has been previously certificated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and/or has been maintained to FAA airworthiness standards;
( v ) Aircraft was previously used for non-flight purposes (i.e., ground training or static display), and has been subjected to extensive disassembly and re-assembly procedures for ground training, or repeated burning for fire-fighting training purposes.
( 4 ) For military aircraft, indicate Category A, B, or C as designated by the Department of Defense (DOD), as follows: Category of aircraft
Description A
Aircraft authorized for sale and exchange for commercial use. B
Aircraft previously used for ground instruction and/or static display. C
Aircraft that are combat configured as determined by DOD.
Note to § 102-36.340 ( a
)(4):
For additional information on military aircraft see Defense Materiel Disposition Manual, DOD 4160.21-M, accessible at *www.drms.dla.mil* under “Publications.”
( b ) When the designated transfer or donation recipient's intended use is for non-flight purposes, you must remove and return the data plate to GSA Property Management Branch (9FBP), San Francisco, CA 94102-3434 prior to releasing the aircraft to the authorized recipient. GSA will forward the data plates to FAA.
( c ) You must also submit a report of the final disposition of the aircraft to the Federal Aviation Interactive Reporting System (FAIRS) maintained by the Office of Travel, Transportation, and Asset Management (MT), GSA, 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405. For additional instructions on reporting to FAIRS, see part 102-33 of this chapter.
[65 FR 31218, May 16, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 53572, Sept. 12, 2006]
No. 11-1108.

#### Byrd *v.*Tennessee Board of Chiropractic Examiners.

Ct. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: 22-143: In Re EXPEDIA, INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential
DISMISS; Opinion Filed May 30, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00099-CR

ROBERT CLYDE MCMILLEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-59889-Y

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Lang

Robert Clyde McMillen pleaded guilty to felony theft. See TEX. PEN. CODE ANN. 

§ 31.03(e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2012). Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court assessed 

punishment at ten months’ confinement in a state jail and a $1,500 fine. Appellant waived his 

right to appeal in conjunction with the plea agreement. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 

219–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court certified that appellant does not have the right to 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

130099F.U05

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
130099.op.docx –2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ROBERT CLYDE MCMILLEN, Appellant

No. 05-13-00099-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 7, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-59889-Y.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices 

Myers and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 30th day of May, 2013.

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
250 E Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000 | 800-942-2677 | TTY 800-833-3722

To: Deborah Jeffrey

Inspector General 

From: Jeffrey Page/s/

Chief Operating Officer/Acting Chief Risk Officer 

Subject: High-Dollar Overpayments for the quarter ending September 30, 2017

Date: October 23, 2017

The purpose of this document is to comply with the High-Dollar overpayments reporting 

requirements in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123, Appendix C. 

Appendix C requires agency heads to submit reports quarterly on High-Dollar 

overpayments to the Office of Inspector General.

The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) identifies high-dollar 

overpayments through improper payments testing, which was completed in September 

2017 (Q4). CNCS has identified the AmeriCorps, RSVP, FGP, and SCP grant programs as 

susceptible to significant improper payments. The high-dollar overpayment threshold is 

based upon aggregate payments to an individual or entity during a quarter. CNCS 

projected all payments identified as improper to reflect the quarterly amount paid. For the 

reporting period covering 7/01/2017 through 9/30/2017, CNCS did not identify any highdollar overpayments.

This report upholds the agency’s commitment to carrying out the Executive Order goal of 

eliminating payment errors. Reducing improper payments is a key priority for CNCS. We 

continue to monitor programs in order to reduce the amount of overpayments.
§ 302-17.69 How do I pay taxes on my RITA under the two-year process? When income taxes are due for Year 2, you must report your RITA, if any, as taxable income on your Federal, state, and local tax returns. ( a ) If your relocation process results in only one Year 2, or if the previous year was your last Year 1, your RITA is the only amount that you report as income resulting from your relocation for that Year 2.
( b ) If, on the other hand, your relocation process results in more than one Year 2 (if, for example, you incurred relocation expenses during more than one calendar year), then, except for your last Year 2, you will need to report reimbursements, allowances, direct payments to vendors, and WTA(s), if any, for succeeding Year 1's at the same time that you report each Year 2's RITA.
( c ) See the table in § 302-17.60 for a graphic explanation of Year 1 and Year 2.
§ 105-74.505 How are violations of this part determined for recipients who are individuals? An individual recipient is in violation of the requirements of this part if the Administrator of General Services determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart C of this part; or
( b ) The recipient is convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any award activity.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF STRIKING ECF NOS. 63 & 64

Defendant William Trevor Lawrence, pursuant to the Clerk’s Notices in ECF Nos. 65 & 67,

strikes the pro hac vice motions filed on February 23, 2023 [ECF Nos. 63 & 64] and will refile 

same in accordance with CM/ECF Admin. Procedures and the Local Rules.

Dated: February 24, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

DIMOND KAPLAN & ROTHSTEIN, P.A.

Offices at Grand Bay Plaza

2665 South Bayshore Drive, PH-2B

Miami, Florida 33133

Telephone: (305) 374-1920

Facsimile: (305) 374-1961

By: /s Alexander M. Peraza 

David A. Rothstein, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 995762

 DRothstein@dkrpa.com

Alexander M. Peraza, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 107044

APeraza@dkrpa.com

Eshaba Jahir-Sharuz, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 1038846

 Eshaba@dkrpa.com

Counsel for William Trevor Lawrence

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 68 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 31, 2005 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|--------------------- | --------------------
|                      | John P. Manning     
|                      | Director, President 
|                      | (Principal Executive
|                      | Officer), BCTC IV   
|                      | Assignor Corp.
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 85-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023   Page 1 of 1
**AMERICORPS MEMBER TIMESHEET OUTLINE**

This outline is a training tool designed to help new AmeriCorps program staff create a member timesheet. It will be most helpful when used alongside the Grant Terms and Conditions, AmeriCorps Regulations, and other AmeriCorps-specific guidance. The outline is for reference only; it does not contain citations for all AmeriCorps grant or program requirements. Additional information can be found on AmeriCorps State and National grantee pages on AmeriCorps.gov under Resources – “Manage Members”.

Guidance documents referenced in this outline: 

· AC = AmeriCorps State and National Grants Program Specific Terms and Conditions 

· General = AmeriCorps Grants General Terms and Conditions 

· 45 CFR = AmeriCorps Regulations

Annual General and Program Specific Terms and Conditions can be found on AmeriCorps State and National grantee pages on AmeriCorps.gov under Resources – “View Terms and Conditions”.

Complete and accurate timesheets are required to document each AmeriCorps member’s service. They provide the evidence to support the member’s eligibility for benefits during and after the term of service, including the post-service education award. Timesheets must be stored per the grant agreement recordkeeping requirements and available for inspection by AmeriCorps staff and the AmeriCorps Office of Inspector General as part of routine monitoring, audits, or investigations.

2

# image1.png
Attendance for January 13, 2011 Informal Conference Call with EPA-NHTSA

COMPANY NAME 13-Jan

GUESTS

USEPA Byron Bunker 1

USEPA Angela Cullen 1

USDOT-NHTSA Maurice Hicks 1

SUPPLIER WORKING GROUP

Alcoa Brian Tucker 1

Bendix Andreea Raaber 1

Bendix Mark McCollough 1

Bergstrom Paul VonDriska 1

Delphi Dina Vizzacarro 1

Delphi Ragiemra Amato 1

Delphi Bruce Moor 1

Delphi Daniel Hennessy 1

Eaton Chris Hess 1

Espar Heater Systems Paula Bishop 1

Heavy Duty Manufacturers Association Jennifer Hjalmquist 1

Honeywell Jackie Glassman 1

Honeywell Nando Gomez 1

Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association Catherine Boland 1

Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association Leigh Merino 1

Remy Jack Vollbrecht 1

Robert Bosch LLC Cathy Lillie 1

SRG Global Patrick Fenchak 1

Umicore Autocat USA Inc. Greg Garr 1

Webasto Albrecht Otte 1

ZF Industries, Inc. Muneer Samra 1

24
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Alpine Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Periodic Report"), I, David S. Aldridge, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: November 14, 2002 |  | /s/DAVID S. ALDRIDGEDavid S. Aldridge
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32 (a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Yearly Report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Govatski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski

Chief Executive Officer



October 18, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15761]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Special Emphasis Panel Clinical Trials Collaborations for Nursing 
Research (NR-00-03).
    Date: July 12, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 AM to 5 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, Maryland Room, 8120 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Mary J. Stephens-Frazier, PHD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Nursing Research, National 
Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN32, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 594-5971.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 16, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-15761 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M