alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered January 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00083-CR

SHAMONT DESMOND SMALL,, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F05-26251-W

ORDER

On April 27, 2012, the appeal was abated for findings regarding appellant’s brief. On 

May 15, 2012, the Court granted appellant’s motion to extend time to file his brief and ordered 

the brief filed as of the date of that order. The May 15, 2012 order, however, did not formally 

reinstate the appeal. Accordingly, we DIRECT the Clerk to show the appeal is reinstated as of 

May 15, 2012.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
# Comments on: 19-2161: DATA SCAPE LIMITED v. WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION [OPINION], Nonprecedential
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-220 1020 XQ 2527] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C. appendix, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the Front Range Resource Advisory Council (Colorado) will be held on July 13, 2000 in Buena Vista, Colorado. 

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m. at the Buena Vista Community Center, 715 E. Main Street, Buena Vista, Colorado. The focus of the meeting will be a field trip to the Fourmile area where the Fourmile Travel Management planning is in progress. 

                        The Resource Advisory Council meeting is open to the public, however they will need to provide their own transportation for the field trip. A Four-wheel drive vehicle is recommended. Interested persons may make oral                               ( print page 39628)                            statements to the Council at 9:45 a.m. or written statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. The Center Manager may limit the length of oral presentations depending on the number of people wishing to speak.                     

# DATES:

The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, July 13, 2000 from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Front Range Center, 3170 East Main Street, Canon City, Colorado 81212 

# CONTACT:

For further information contact Ken Smith at (719)269-8500 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Summary minutes for the Council meeting will be maintained in the Canon City Center and will be available for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within thirty (30) days following the meeting. 

Dated: June 20, 2000. 

Kenneth L. Smith, 

Acting Front Range Center Manager. 

[FR Doc. 00-16144 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
§ 304-3.11 Am I limited to the maximum subsistence allowances (per diem or actual expense) prescribed in applicable travel regulations for travel expenses paid by a non-Federal source? Generally yes. Subsistence expenses are usually limited to the maximum subsistence allowances (per diem or actual expense) prescribed in chapter 301 of this title for travel in CONUS, by the Secretary of Defense for travel in non-foreign areas and by the Secretary of State for travel in foreign areas. However, acceptance of payment for, and when applicable, reimbursement by an agency to an employee and the accompanying spouse of such employee are not subject to the maximum per diem or actual subsistence expense rates when traveling in CONUS or in non-foreign areas under the following conditions: ( a ) The non-Federal source pays the full amount of the subsistence expense, as authorized by your agency; and
( b ) The subsistence expense paid by the non-Federal source is comparable in value to that offered to or purchased by other meeting attendees; and
( c ) Your agency has approved acceptance of payment from the non-Federal source prior to your travel; if your agency has not approved any acceptance from the non-Federal source, you may not exceed the maximum allowances. See § 304-3.13.
Note:
The maximum subsistence allowances established by the Secretary of State for travel to foreign areas may not be exceeded.
[FTR Amdt. 2003-02, 68 FR 12604, Mar. 17, 2003, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2013-01, 78 FR 65212, Oct. 31, 2013]
#### § 302-9.3 What is a “post of duty” for purposes of this part?

For purposes of this part, a “post of duty” is an official station outside CONUS.
# Comments on: 20-1477: ILIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC. [OPINION], Nonprecedential
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-1226WM

_____________

Vincent L. Lomax, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

Carol Lomax, * On Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Plaintiff, * Western District of Missouri.

 *

v. * [Not to be Published]

 *

City of Joplin, Missouri, *

 *

Appellee. *

 *

___________

 Submitted: October 3, 1997

 Filed: October 27, 1997

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, McMILLIAN, and BEAM, Circuit

Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
We reject appellees& suggestion that the notice of appeal is untimely. See Fed. 1

R. App. P. 4(c); Van Orman v. Purkett, 43 F.3d 1201, 1202 (8th Cir. 1994).

The Honorable Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., United States District Judge for the

2

Western District of Missouri.

-2-

Vincent Lomax appeals from the District Court&s adverse grant of summary

1 2

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Joplin, Missouri, and

others. Upon review of the record and the parties& submissions on appeal, we conclude

that the judgment of the District Court is correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2008 (the Report), I, Bernard Poussot, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: May 5, 2008



By:

/s/    Bernard PoussotBernard PoussotPresident and Chief Executive Officer
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04331A014
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The undersigned  executive  officers of the Registrant  hereby certify that
this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  for the year  ended  June 30,  2002  (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.



                              By:/s/ Joseph J. Bouffard
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:    Joseph J. Bouffard
                                 Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer



                              By:/s/ Michael J. Dee
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:    Michael J. Dee
                                 Title:  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                         and Controller

Date: September 23, 2002
46697.

#### COBB FAMILY DENTISTRY v. REICH.

(383 SE2d 891)

Hunt, Justice.

Cobb Family Dentistry, P. C. (CFD) complained in Cobb Superior Court that its former employee, Robin Reich, was violating the terms of a covenant not to compete in her amended employment contract. The trial court agreed with Reich that the covenant was too broad and too vague to be enforced and granted summary judgment against CFD.

When Robin Reich began her practice of general dentistry under an employment contract with CFD in June of 1985, she agreed that if she terminated her employment after having worked for CFD for at least twelve months, she would

> For a period of two (2) years . . . not engage in the practice of dentistry or any specialty of dentistry in any office located within seven miles of any office of employer in which employee has practiced and [would] not . . . solicit or take away any patients of employer, including, any patients . . . cared for by employee while in the employ of employer ....

In the latter part of. 1987, Reich desired to leave CFD and join another dentist within the seven-mile radius in which her practice would have been prohibited by the covenant. In order to obtain a waiver of the seven-mile limitation, she agreed to an amendment to the covenant so that when she left on December 30, 1987, she would not for two years

> . . . solicit any patients that have been seen at Cobb Family Dentistry, P.C., or in any way advertise or solicit prospective patients in any manner that is targeted or an attempt to reach potential patients in the ZIP code areas of 30059 or 30001.1

By virtue of the renegotiated covenant, Reich may practice within the seven-mile radius and she may *treat*any patient whether a previous patient of CFD or not. She may not, for two years from December 30, 1987, *solicit*individuals who were seen as patients by Cobb while she was there and she may not *solicit*business (potential patients) in the two ZIP code areas. We disagree with the trial court that these restrictions are impermissibly vague or broad and reverse *451the grant of summary judgment.

Decided September 29, 1989.

*Edwards, Friedewald & Grayson, James W. Friedewald,*for appellant.

*Warner, Mayoue & Ryals, John C. Mayoue,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Bell, J., who dissents.*

1

 Although CFD attracted patients from several ZIP code areas, its practice was located in ZIP code area 30059. ZIP code 30001 covers Austell. Smyrna, where Reich has her office, is in neither of these ZIP code areas.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40132-40133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Telematics Suppliers Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 12, 1999, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act``), Telematics Suppliers Consortium, 
Inc. has filed written

[[Page 40133]]

notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) The identities of the parties and (2) 
the nature and objective of the venture. The notifications were filed 
for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery 
of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of 
the parties are Alpine Electronics of America, Inc., Torrance, CA; AMP 
Inc., Harrisburg, PA; Cellport Labors Inc., Boulder, CO; Ford Motor 
Company, Dearborn, MI; Kenwood Corp., Tokyo, JAPAN; and Motorola Inc., 
Schaumburg, IL. The nature and objectives of the venture are to promote 
the development and adoption of open, accessible, secure, end to end 
technical specification (``Telematics Specifications``) permitting the 
transaction of data to and from, as well as within, automobiles and 
other vehicles; to promote such specifications and solutions worldwide 
to ensure that a broad spectrum of goods and services is developed and 
are available to provide for testing and conformity assessment of 
network components in order to ensure robust system operation; to 
create and own distinctive trademarks; and to operate a branding 
program based upon distinctive trademarks to create high customer 
awareness of, demand for, and confidence in products designed in 
compliance with Telematics Specification.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-16484 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-351-000]

Take notice that on June 16, 2000, Stingray Pipeline Company (Stingray) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume 1, the revised tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the filing. Stingray proposes that the foregoing tariff sheets be made effective on July 1, 2000.

Stingray states this filing is made to reflect changes relating to the implementation of a new Interactive Internet Website.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16137  Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN SCIENCE AND
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US $
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,319
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,018
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,108
<PP&E>                                           1,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,354
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,098
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,665
<SALES>                                          7,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,532
<CGS>                                            4,782
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    24
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    640
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                610
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       610
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
# Comments on: 20-1139: BITMANAGEMENT SOFTWARE GMBH v. US [OPINION], Precedential
No. 11-60.

#### Gunder’s Auto Center *v.*State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 60-300.84 Responsibilities of appropriate employment service delivery system.

By statute, appropriate employment service delivery systems are required to refer qualified protected veterans to fill employment openings listed by contractors with such appropriate employment delivery systems pursuant to the mandatory job listing requirements of the equal opportunity clause and are required to give priority to protected veterans in making such referrals. The employment service delivery systems shall provide OFCCP, upon request, information pertinent to whether the contractor is in compliance with the mandatory job listing requirements of the equal opportunity clause.
§ 105-50.202-2 Preparation of or assistance in the conduct of statistical or other studies. ( a ) This service includes preparation of statistical or other studies and compilations, technical tests and evaluations, technical information, surveys, reports, and documents and assistance in the conduct of such activities and in the preparation of such materials, provided they are of a type similar to those which GSA is authorized by law to conduct or prepare and when resources are available.
( b ) Specific areas in which GSA can conduct or participate in the conduct of studies include: ( 1 ) Space management, including assignment and utilization;
( 2 ) Supply management, including laboratory tests and evaluations;
( 3 ) Management of motor vehicles;
( 4 ) Archives and records management;
( 5 ) Automatic data processing systems; and
( 6 ) Telecommunications and teleprocessing systems and services.
#### § 302-3.420 How long may my agency pay for property management services?

Your agency may pay for property management services for the duration of your TCS.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-06, 76 FR 71889, Nov. 21, 2011]
Exhibit 31.2

                      Chief Financial Officer CERTIFICATION

                                   AT&T Corp.

                    Certifications Pursuant To Section 302 of
                         The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Thomas W. Horton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of AT&T ;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting ; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: January 8, 2004

                                       /s/  Thomas W. Horton
                                       -----------------------
                                       Chief Financial Officer