alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFRPart 52 [EPA-R06-0AR-2007-0526; 

### FRL - -.I Approval and Promulgation ofAir Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; Revision to Control Volatile Organic Compound Emissions in the Houston/GalvestonlBrazoria 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area

AGENCY: Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA).

ACrION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) proposes to approve a revisionto the Texas State ImplementationPlan (SIP). The revision adds additional requirements to control volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from storage tanks, transportvessels and marine vessels in the HoustonlGalvestonlBrazoria (HGB) 1997 8-hourozone nonattainment area, which consists ofBrazoria, Chambers, FortBend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery and Waller counties. Specifically, this revision subjects owners or operators ofVOC storage tanks, transport vessels, and marine vessels located in the HGB 1997 8-hourozone nonattainment area to more stringent control, monitoring, and recordkeeping requirements. EPA proposes to approve the SIP revision because it will help lower ozone levels in the HGB area by reducing VOC emissions. EPA proposes to approve the revision pursuant to section 110 and part D ofthe Clean Air Act (CM).2 DATES: Written comments must be received on or before (Insert date 30 days from date of publication in the Federal Register].

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental ProtectionAgency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section ofthe direct final rule located in the rules section ofthis FederalRegister.

FORFURTHERINFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Young, Air Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone 214-665-6645; fax number 214-665-7263; e-mail 

### addressyoung.carl@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

### In the final rules section ofthis Federal Register, EPA is approvingthe State's SIP submittal as a direct rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. Ifno adverse comments are received in response to this action no further activity is contemplated. IfEPA receives' adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second commentperiod. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

### 3
For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

# Dated:~D Al Armendariz, Regional Administrator, Region 6
Exhibit 10.18



            COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

     For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, Richard W. Lucas, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, received a base salary of $125,000, a
discretionary bonus of $20,000 and a 25% matching contribution to the Company's
profit sharing/401(k) plan in an amount of $3,500. Mr. Lucas' base salary for
the year ending December 31, 2006 is $130,000, and he was awarded a
discretionary bonus of $25,000 during March 2006. The Company may terminate Mr.
Lucas' employment at will.

     For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, James F. Oliviero received a
base salary of $170,000, a discretionary bonus of $30,000 and a 25% matching
contribution to the Company's profit sharing/401(k) plan in an amount of $4,500.
In addition, Mr. Oliviero was awarded a bonus of $37,463 in consideration of his
efforts in preparing and prosecuting the Company's impact claims in the Co-Op
City project lawsuit. Mr. Oliviero's base salary for the year ending December
31, 2006 is $175,000 and was awarded discretionary bonus of $35,000 during March
2006. The Company may terminate Mr. Oliviero's employment at will.

     Floyd Warkol, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, was awarded a
$50,000 discretionary bonus during March 2006.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of **LUNA GOLD CORP.** (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Tim Searcy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of April, 2005.

 
/s/ Tim Searcy 
Tim Searcy 
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2008 (the Report), I, Gregory Norden, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 5, 2008



By:

/s/ Gregory NordenGregory NordenSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION VII
 

901 NORTH 5TH STREET 

KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101 

September 23, 2011 

Anthony Tate 

4301 North 33 Street 

Omaha, Nebraska 68111 

RE: SAID: 34012 

4301 North 33 Street 

Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment 

Dear Owner/Resident: 

A Lead Based Paint assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency as part of the Omaha Lead site investigation. The purpose of 

this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of LBP is present on the exterior 

surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc) exist 

that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels. 

Enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 4301 North 33 Street. The EPA has developed paint 

stabilization eligibility criteria that involve measuring the amount of deteriorated LBP on a 

structure and calculating the concentration of lead in soils around the home that would result if 

all of the identified deteriorated paint were to fall to the ground and uniformly mix with the soil 

under certain assumptions. During the LBP assessment, the areal extent of the deteriorated paint 

observed on structure surfaces was estimated and the lead content in the deteriorated paint was 

measured using an X-Ray Fluorescence instrument. 

The data obtained during the LBP assessment was used to estimate the increase in soil lead 

concentration that would result if all of the deteriorating paint identified in the assessment were 

to fall to the ground and mix with surface soil within six feet of the foundation of the structure. 

For purposes of this calculation, the deteriorating LBP on a structure is assumed to fall onto the 

ground surface within six feet of the foundation and be uniformly mixed with the top one inch 

of soil. The estimated lead concentration in the soil potentially caused by the deteriorating LBP 

provides a measure of the severity of LBP deterioration on individual structures. The EPA uses 

these criteria to rank properties based on the potential for recontamination of soil to occur. Paint 

stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LBP problems, 

particularly where children under the age of seven reside. 

The LBP assessment performed by the EPA using the above criteria indicated that your 

house IS NOT eligible for paint stabilization. 
 

 

 

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at 

(402) 731-3045. 

Sincerely, 

Pauletta R. France-Isetts 

Project Coordinator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Enclosures 

Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045. 

Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment 

LEGEND: H - N - P - 01 - 34012 Samples Analyzed 

(Wood,concrete, etc.) Area 

~5-4~ ftz 

l3 , Rq ft'
305P15

#### State v. Roger Lewis Smyre

1. Def’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA14-1178)

1.—

2. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Denied

3. Def’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Decision of COA

3. Denied

4. State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

4. Allowed
404 A.2d 1350

#### Commonwealth, Appellant, v. Valentino.

Argued June 15, 1977.

Deborah E. Glass, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellant; Leon A. Mankowski, for appellee.

Order affirmed.

VAN der VOORT and SPAETH, JJ., dissented.

JACOBS, former P. J., WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
In The Matter Of: 

### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASIDNGTON, D.C. 

# RECEIVED JUL - 7 2015 HEARING DOCKET

BIRMINGHAM FLIGHT CENTER, INC. Docket No. FAA-2014-0867 Judge J.E. Sullivan Respondent. FAA Case No. 2012S0090053

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) hereby designates the undersigned as its representative in this matter, replacing the previously identified counsel, who is no longer an employee ofthe FAA: Christopher Stevenson Office ofthe Regional Counsel Southern Region P.O. Box 20636 Atianta; dA 30320 telephone: (404) 305-5208 ' '



### f'desiinh~: **~404)305-5223** e-mail: chris.stevenson@faa.gov All future correspondence and communicationin this matter shouldbe addressed to the undersigned. 

### y}-. Respectfully submitted this _\_day ofJuly, 2015.

' • f r



# //~ .... CHRISTOPHERR. STEVENSON Attorney·
... Office oftheRegional CoimselCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice ofAppearance was sent: original and one copy via certified mailto: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building- Suite 2Wl000
one copy via certified mail and facsimile to: The Honorable J.E. Sullivan Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 facsimile: (202) 366-7536 Paul R. Borth, Esq. Barnett & Borth, LLC 800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200 Glenview, IL 60025 facsimile: (815) 356-7042 

# ill()] ttJl\)

# ~ M

# Oao

# i DONNA STA LEY Legal Assistant Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

### JUL

. 1 2015 Dated
LINDA LINGLE 

GOVERNOR 

EXECUTIVE CHAMBERS 

HONOLULU 

January 30,2009 

Ms. Laura Yoshi 

Acting Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 94 105 

Dear Ms. Yoshi: 

SUBJECT: Recommended Designation for the Revised 8-Hour Primary and Secondary 

Federal Ozone (03) National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

Pursuant to Section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act, I am recommending that the State of Hawaii 

be designated in attainment of the revised 8-hour primary and secondary O3 National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS). The Department of Health (DOH), which manages the ambient air 

monitoring network, has determined that the quality-assured and certified O3 data for the calendar 

years 2005 through 2007 is in attainment with the federal O3 standards. 

As requiredin 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, the state operates one station using a Federal 

Equivalent Method sampler for the collection of O3 data. Attachment I provides the data used for the 

calculation of the 8-hour standard design value. The three-year average of the fourth highest daily 

maximum 8-hour values was well below the revised O3 NAAQS. Additionally, the station had an 

average 98 percent data capture rate which met the 90 percent data completeness requirement. 

Based on continuous compliance with the NAAQS and ongoing monitoring of air pollution 

sources, the state has determined that there are no anticipated changes or activities that would cause a 

significant vzriation frcm the currefitly mezsured O3 va!~es. Vre therefere ask fcr EPA's ccnsider~tim 

of our recommendation for attainment of the revised 8-hour O3 standards. 

We look forward to working with EPA, Region IX, on the final designation for this public 

health and environmental issue. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Wilfred Nagamine at 

the DOH, Clean Air Branch, at (808) 586-4200. 

Sincerely, 

LINDA LINGLE U 

Attachment RECEIVED 

c: Deborah Jordan, Director, Air Division (AIR-I), U.S. EPA, Region IX 

Sean Hogan, Manager, Technical Support Office (AIR-7), U.S. EPA, Region IX FEB 0 3 2009 

AIR DIVISION 

U.S. €PA, REGION 9 
uo aaJyl s~eaA 40 ayl lsou 'lua3a~ pa~nss~-Al!~enb PUB pa!j!ya3 'epp 

ayl apls 40 !!BMEH s! u! luauu!eUe ayljo Mau ~noy-8 hleu!~d PUB hlepu03as sp~epuels paseq 

y,,s~ elep ~ssaua~a~duo~ 

sAep yy~ P!IEA jua!que ~U!JO~!UOUI elep S! ~alea~6 ueyl '%06 pue ou al6u!s JeaA SB~ ssal ueyl 

s!yl uo!yels osle slaau aql el~p ssaualalduo3 ~uaua~!nba~ asnwaq ayl a6e~a~e luauad 40 

pap~~~n~) 01 8~0.0 (udd s! ssal ueyl ~~0.0 -udd 

Ienuue ~sa~j6!y-yunoj Al!ep unu!xeu .~noy-8 a6~~a~e €0 suo!ge~lua3uo3 c~~8~o-o) 'udd 

s!yl uo!gels slaau ayl hleu!~d PUB hlepu03as €0 splepuels asneaaq ayl JeaA-E a6~~a~e 40 ayl 

ayl apls 40 !!BMBH sey auo auozo 6u!~ol!uou uo!yels leyl sale~ado zc syluou ayljo *~eaA
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-526 

________________________________________________________________________ 

AVIATION 

Transport Services 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and GABON 

Signed at Washington May 26, 2004 

 with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
GABON 

Aviation: Transport Services 

 Agreement signed at Washington May 26, 2004; 

 Entered into force May 26, 2004. 

 With annexes.
##### 



Exhibit (31)b Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Robert P. Ryder, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of American Greetings Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of American Greetings Corporation as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    American Greetings Corporations other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for American Greetings Corporation and we have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to American Greetings Corporation, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of American Greetings Corporations
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in American Greetings Corporations
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the third quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
American Greetings Corporations internal control over financial reporting; 37




---



##### 



5.
    American Greetings Corporations other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to American Greetings
Corporations auditors and the audit committee of American Greetings Corporations board of
directors:  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect American Greetings Corporations ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in American Greetings Corporations internal
control over financial reporting. January 7, 2005
    
    /s/ Robert P. RyderRobert P. RyderSenior Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
 38
National Service in Puerto Rico 

2020 YEAR IN REVIEW 

Our Programs and Initiatives 

e AmeriCorps

AmeriCorps State and National matches individuals with organizations that see service as a solution to local, 

regional, and national challenges. There are thousands of opportunities in locations across the country to 

serve with nonprofits, schools, public agencies, tribes, and community and faith-based groups. Most 

AmeriCorps grant funding goes to the Puerto Rico Commission for Volunteerism & Community Service, the 

Governor-appointed State Service Commission, which in turn awards grants to organizations to respond to 

local needs. 

AmeriCorps VISTA places individuals with organizations that fight poverty, to build capacity and make 

sustainable change. Through fundraising, grant writing, volunteer recruitment, and so much more, 

AmeriCorps VISTA members gain experience and leadership skills that put them on track for a life of service in 

the public, private, or nonprofit sector. 

AmeriCorps NCCC is a full-time, team-based, residential program for 18-24-year-olds. Whether clearing trails 

for a national park or building homes for families in need, AmeriCorps NCCC members engage in a variety of 

projects in multiple communities while developing leadership and teamwork skills. AmeriCorps NCCC FEMA 

Corps serves communities, in coordination with FEMA, through disaster preparedness, response, and 

recovery. 

AmeriCorps Seniors Foster Grandparents provides grants to organizations to engage low-income Americans 

55 and older in providing one-on-one mentoring and academic support to children with special or 

exceptional needs. 

AmeriCorps Seniors Senior Companions provides grants to organizations to engage low-income Americans 

55 and older in providing supportive, individualizes services to help older adults and adults maintain their 

dignity and independence. 

AmeriCorps Seniors RSVP provides grants to organizations to engage Americans 55 and older in tutoring and 

mentoring youth, responding to natural disasters, supporting veterans and their families, and meeting other 

critical needs. 

Volunteer Generation Fund supports voluntary organizations and state service commissions in boosting the 

impact of volunteers in addressing critical community needs. 

MLK Day of Service is observed each year on the third Monday in January as "a day on, not a day off." MLK 

Day is the only federal holiday designated as a national day of service to encourage all Americans to volunteer 

to improve their communities. 

9/11 Day of Service calls Americans across the country to volunteer in their local communities in tribute to the 

individuals lost and injured in the attacks, first responders, and the many who have risen in service to defend 

freedom. 

Learn More 

To see other reports about national service in Puerto Rico, email PR@cns.gov. 

I A meriCorps.gov 

2
§ 951.6 Censure, suspension or disbarment; grounds. ( a ) The Judicial Officer may censure, suspend or disbar any person against whom a complaint has been made and upon whom charges have been served as provided in § 951.5 if he finds that such person: ( 1 ) Does not possess the qualifications required by § 951.2;
( 2 ) Has failed to conform to standards of ethical conduct required of practitioners at the Bar of any court of which he is a member;
( 3 ) Represents, as an associate, an attorney who, known to him, solicits practice by means of runners or other unethical methods;
( 4 ) By use of his name, personal appearance, or any device, aids or abets an attorney to practice during the period of his suspension or disbarment, such suspension or disbarment being known to him;
( 5 ) Displays toward the Judicial Officer, Board of Contract Appeals or any Administrative Law Judge assigned to the Postal Service, conduct which, if displayed toward any court of any State, the United States, any of its Territories or the District of Columbia, would be cause for censure, suspension or disbarment; or
( 6 ) Is otherwise guilty of misconduct or lacking in character or professional integrity.
( b ) Before any person shall be censured, suspended or disbarred, he shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard by the Judicial Officer on the charges made against him. The General Counsel or his designee shall prosecute such cases.
( c ) In the event the Judicial Officer is unavailable for any reason, he may assign complaints of misconduct to the Associate Judicial Officer, an Administrative Law Judge appointed pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, an Administrative Judge appointed pursuant to the provisions of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, or some other disinterested member of the headquarters staff of the Postal Service recommended by the Deputy Postmaster General, for the determinations required by § 951.5, the conduct of the hearings, and the decision to censure, suspend, or debar persons as provided herein.
[36 FR 11562, June 16, 1971, as amended at 51 FR 16517, May 5, 1986]
#### § 302-2.105 When an employee transfers between Federal agencies, who is responsible for paying the employee's relocation expenses?

When an employee transfers between Federal agencies, all allowable expenses must be paid from the funds of the agency that the employee is transferring to. However, in the case of a reduction in force or transfer of function, an agreement may be made between the agencies concerned as to what relocation allowances will be paid by either agency or split between them. This should include the payment of expenses for the extended storage of the employee's household goods when assigned to an isolated permanent duty station within CONUS or a transfer to, from, or between foreign countries.