alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 60-30.14 Designation of Administrative Law Judges.

Hearings shall be held before an Administrative Law Judge of the Department of Labor who shall be designated by the Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Department of Labor. After commencement of the proceeding but prior to the designation of an Administrative Law Judge, pleadings and papers shall be filed with the Chief Administrative Law Judge.

[43 FR 49259, Oct. 20, 1978; 43 FR 51401, Nov. 3, 1978]
No. 10-11189.

#### Moss *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-30913

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KEVEION SHINE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:12-CR-146-1

Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Keveion Shine has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Shine has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed 

to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Shine’s claim of ineffective assistance 

of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-30913 Document: 00512945723 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
No. 13-30913

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. 

denied, 135 S. Ct. 123 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Shine’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-30913 Document: 00512945723 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
#### § 302-9.173 How many replacement POV's may my agency authorize me to transport to my post of duty at Government expense?

Your agency may authorize one emergency replacement POV within any 4-year period of continuous service. It may authorize one non-emergency replacement POV after every four years of continuous service beginning on the date you first have use of the POV being replaced.
#### Emma L. Van Etten v. Dell R. Edwards.

Filed February 19, 1895.

No. 5867.

Review: Evidence: Failure to Release Mortgage. There is no question of law involved in this case. The evidence examined, and *held*to support the finding of the jury, and the judgment is affirmed.

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Davis, J.

*David Van Ellen,*for plaintiff in error.

*Break & McClanahan, contra.*

Ragan, C.

Emma L. Van Etten sued Dell R. Edwards in the district court of Douglas county for damages for the latter’s failure to release and discharge of record three certain chattel mortgages. Mrs. Van Etten alleged that she had executed *58and delivered these mortgages to Mrs. Edwards; that she had fully performed all the conditions of the mortgages, and that Mrs. Edwards had refused and neglected for the space of ten days to discharge the same .of record after being duly requested so to do. Mrs. Edwards had a verdict and judgment, and Mrs. Van Etten has prosecuted to this court a petition in error.

The only point made in the motion for a new trial, and the only assignment of error here, is that the verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. It would subserve no useful purpose to quote this evidence or any of it. We have carefully studied it, and we cannot agree with counsel for the plaintiff in error that the verdict rendered .lacks evidence to support it. The judgment must be and is accordingly

Affirmed.

Irvine, C,, not sitting.
# Comments on: 2020-1924: Nika Technologies, Inc. v. US
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM 

GRACE, INC.; ENGAGE MIAMI, INC.; 

SOUTH DADE BRANCH OF THE NAACP; 

MIAMI-DADE BRACH OF THE NAACP; 

CLARICE COOPER; YANELIS VALDES; 

JARED JOHNSON; and ALEXANDER 

CONTRERAS, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF MIAMI, 

Defendant. 

/ 

NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Defendant, CITY OF MIAMI, hereby appeals to the 

United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of 

Law [ECF 185] entered on April 10, 2024, and the Order (ECF 94) entered on July 30, 2023 

sustaining objections to the CITY OF MIAMI’s Notice of Passage of Redistricting Plan. 

(“Notice”)(ECF 77) that had been adopted pursuant to the Court Order (ECF 60) entered on 

May 23, 2023, adopting the Report and Recommendation (ECF 52) and issuing a preliminary 

injunction, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the Honorable 

Kevin Michael Moore presiding. 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Christopher N. Johnson

GRAYROBINSON, P.A. 

Jason L. Unger, Esquire 

Florida Bar No. 991562 

George T. Levesque 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2024 Page 1 of 3
2 

Florida Bar No. 55551 

Andy Bardos 

Florida Bar No. 822671 

301 S. Bronough Street 

Suite 600 

Tallahassee, Florida 32301 

Telephone: (850) 577-9090 

Facsimile: (850) 577-3311 

GRAYROBINSON, P.A.

Christopher N. Johnson 

Florida Bar No. 69329 

Email: Christopher.Johnson@gray-robinson.com 

Marlene Quintana, B.C.S. 

Florida Bar No. 88358 

Email: Marlene.Quintana@gray-robinson.com 

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 3200 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 416-6880 

Facsimile: (305) 416-6887 

CITY OF MIAMI 

GEORGE K. WYSONG, III, City Attorney 

Florida Bar No. 989010 

JOHN A. GRECO, Chief Deputy City Attorney 

Florida Bar No. 991236 

KEVIN R. JONES, Deputy City Attorney 

Florida Bar No. 119067 

Office of the City Attorney 

444 S.W. 2nd Avenue 

Miami, FL 33130 

Telephone: (305) 416-1800 

Facsimile: (305) 416-1801 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2024 Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on May 10, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 

Court by using the CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all 

counsel of record or pro se parties either via transmission of Notice of Electronic Filing generated by 

CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to 

receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. 

By: s/ Christopher N. Johnson

Christopher N. Johnson, Esq. 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2024 Page 3 of 3
No. 11-9609.

#### Tracy *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                  SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT

      This First Amendment to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement
made as of February 1, 1998 (the "Agreement") between American General
Corporation, a Texas corporation (the "Company") and Jon P. Newton (the
"Executive") is made on April 30, 1998.

      1.  Section 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of
the following new paragraph at the end thereof:

            "Unless the Executive shall have notified the Company in writing
      no later than July 1, 1998 (and prior to any termination of his employ-
      ment) of his election that this paragraph shall be null and void and of
      no effect, then, notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
      Section 2.1, if payment of a lump sum amount equal to the actuarial
      equivalent of a Normal Retirement Benefit is to be made pursuant to
      Section 2.6 hereof, the annual amount of the Normal Retirement Benefit
      shall equal (X) minus (Y), where (X) is calculated as set forth above,
      but the amount of (Y) equals only the Social Security Benefit plus the
      Qualified Plan Benefit (and not the Restoration Plan Benefit).  The
      resulting increase in such lump sum amount shall be paid in lieu of any
      Restoration Plan Benefit under the circumstances described in Section
      2.6 hereof and the Executive hereby waives his right to any Restoration
      Plan Benefit under (and only under) such circumstances."

      2.  Section 2.6 of the Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of
the following sentence at the end thereof:

      "Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 2.6, if termi-
      nation of the Executive's employment occurs after a Change in Control
      (or is deemed to have occurred after a Change in Control pursuant to the
      Executive's Employment Agreement) and if payment of a lump sum amount
      equal to the actuarial equivalent of a Normal Retirement Benefit is to
      be made pursuant to this Section 2.6 after the Executive shall have
      attained age 57, the Normal Retirement Benefit calculated pursuant to
      this Section 2.6 shall not be less than the Normal Retirement Benefit
      which the Executive would have accrued if the Executive had continued to
      be employed by the Company until his Normal Retirement Date."

      3.  As amended by this First Amendment, the Agreement is hereby specifi-
cally ratified and reaffirmed.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amend-
ment on April 30, 1998.
<PAGE>










                              AMERICAN GENERAL CORPORATION


                              By       /S/ LARRY D. HORNER           
                                  Name:    Larry D. Horner
                                  Title:   Chairman of the
                                         Personnel Committee


                                       /S/ JON P. NEWTON              
                                      Jon P. Newton




































                                       2
<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3255] 

In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated June 9, 2000, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning on May 5, 2000 and continuing through June 9, 2000. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is July 12, 2000 and for economic injury the deadline is February 13, 2001.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: June 14, 2000. 

Bernard Kulik, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 00-16254 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
§ 301-70.105 May we prohibit an employee from using a POV on official travel? No, but if the employee elects to use a POV instead of an alternative form of transportation you authorize, you must: ( a ) Limit reimbursement to the constructive cost of the authorized method of transportation, which is the sum of travel and transportation expenses the employee would reasonably have incurred had the employee traveled by the method of transportation deemed to be most advantageous to the Government. The calculation will necessarily involve assumptions. Examples of related expenses that could be considered constructive costs include, but are not limited to, taxi and TNC fares, baggage fees, rental car costs, tolls, ferry fees, and parking charges; and
( b ) Charge leave for any duty hours that are missed as a result of travel by POV.
[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15971, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended at 88 FR 2845, Jan. 18, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             32,911
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     488,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                       17,502
<INVENTORY>                                        87,157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  666,897
<PP&E>                                          1,159,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                    767,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,355,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             763,251
<BONDS>                                            20,758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           16,761
<OTHER-SE>                                        564,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,355,835
<SALES>                                           874,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,004,341
<CGS>                                             641,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,760,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  502,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   17,502
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 63,772
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (189,952)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        2,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (192,352)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   710,488
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      518,136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.065)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.065
                                               


</TABLE>
§ 301-71.103 What information must be included on all travel authorizations? You must include: ( a ) The name of the employee(s);
( b ) The signature of the proper authorizing official;
( c ) Purpose of travel;
( d ) Any conditions of or limitations on that authorization;
( e ) An estimate of the travel costs (for open authorizations it should include an estimate of the travel costs over the period covered); and
( f ) A statement that the employee(s) is (are) authorized to travel.
# Comments on: 2020-1506: Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar v. US
§ 301-12.2 What baggage expenses may my agency pay? Your agency may reimburse expenses related to baggage as follows: ( a ) Transportation charges for authorized excess;
( b ) Necessary charges for transferring baggage;
( c ) Necessary charges for storage of baggage when such charges are the result of official business;
( d ) All fees pertaining to the first checked bag. In addition, charges relating to the second and subsequent bags may be reimbursed when the agency determines those expenses necessary and in the interest of the Government (*see* §§ 301-70.300, 301-70.301). Travelers should verify their agency's current policies and procedures regarding excess baggage prior to traveling; and
( e ) Charges or tips at transportation terminals for handling Government property carried by the traveler.
[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15965, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2010-07, 75 FR 72967, Nov. 29, 2010]
266P15

#### State v. Thomas Rashad Armstrong

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-7G5)

Denied

Ervin, J.,

recused
No. 10-11221.

#### Wyatt *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### MEMORANDUM TO FILE TO: Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR- 2013-0009; Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Navajo Nation; Regional Haze Require ments for Navajo Generating Station; Proposed Rule FROM: Jared Blumenfeld Date: April 25, 2013 Subject: Record of Meeting with President Ben Shelly during Public Comment Period 1. Participants at Meeting
 Jared Blumenfeld, EPA
 Ben Shelly, President, Navajo Nation 2. Date and Location of Meeting:
 April 16, 2013, Gallup, NM 3. General Statement of the Topic of Discussion:
 We talked about NGS, impacts on jo bs, and impacts on the community.

4. Copy of Any Materials Presented or Received:
 (none)

### MEMORANDUM TO FILE TO: Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR- 2013-0009; Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Navajo Nation; Regional Haze Require ments for Navajo Generating Station; Proposed Rule FROM: Jared Blumenfeld Date: April 25, 2013 Subject: Record of Meeting with Dwight Witherspoon, Navajo Na tion Council Delegate, during Public Comment Period 1. Participants at Meeting
 Jared Blumenfeld, EPA
 Dwight Witherspoon, Council Delegate, Navajo Nation 2. Date and Location of Meeting:
 April 16, 2013, Window Rock, NM 3. General Statement of the Topic of Discussion:
 We talked about NGS and impacts to the comm unity. Dwight is Council Delegate for Navajo Nation representing the Black Mesa area.

4. Copy of Any Materials Presented or Received:
 (none)

### MEMORANDUM TO FILE TO: Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR- 2013-0009; Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Navajo Nation; Regional Haze Require ments for Navajo Generating Station; Proposed Rule FROM: Jared Blumenfeld Date: April 24, 2013 Subject: Record of Meeting with Black Mesa Water Coalition during Public Comment Period 1. Participants at Meeting
 Jared Blumenfeld, EPA
 Wahleah Johns, Black Mesa Water Coalition
 Marshall Johnson, Black Mesa Water Coalition 2. Date and Location of Meeting:
 April 17, 2013, Black Mesa, AZ 3. General Statement of the Topic of Discussion:
 We talked about NGS and impacts to communities.

4. Copy of Any Materials Presented or Received:
 (none)

### MEMORANDUM TO FILE TO: Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR- 2013-0009; Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Navajo Nation; Regional Haze Require ments for Navajo Generating Station; Proposed Rule FROM: Jared Blumenfeld Date: April 24, 2013 Subject: Record of Meeting with P eabody Energy during Public Comment Period 1. Participants at Meeting
 Jared Blumenfeld, EPA
 Brian Dunfee, Peabody Energy
 Audry Rappleyea, Peabody Energy
 G. Brad Brown, Peabody Energy 2. Date and Location of Meeting:
 April 17, 2013, Kayenta Mine, Kayenta, AZ 3. General Statement of the Topic of Discussion:
 We talked about NGS.

4. Copy of Any Materials Presented or Received:
 (none)
<PAGE>
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Capital Corp of the West:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-41440) on Form S-8 of Capital Corp of the West of our report dated
January 26, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Capital Corp
of the West and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000,
annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Corp of the West.

/s/ KPMG


San Francisco, California
March 28, 2001
§ 303-70.101 What costs must we pay for preparation and transportation of employee remains? You must pay all actual costs including but not limited to: ( a ) Preparation of remains, including: ( 1 ) Embalming or cremation;
( 2 ) Necessary clothing;
( 3 ) A casket or container suitable for shipment to place of interment; and
( 4 ) Expenses necessary to comply with local laws at the port of entry in the United States; and
( b ) Transportation of remains by common carrier (that is normally used for transportation of remains), hearse, other means, or a combination thereof, from the TDY station, OCONUS location, or CONUS location covered by § 303-70.1(e), to the employee's residence, official station, or place of interment, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) Movement from place of death to a mortuary and/or cemetery;
( 2 ) Shipping permits;
( 3 ) Outside case for shipment and sealing of the case if necessary;
( 4 ) Removal to and from the common carrier; and
( 5 ) Ferry fares, bridge tolls, and similar charges.
Note to § 303-70.101 :
Costs for an outside case are not authorized for transportation by hearse. Costs for transportation by hearse or other means cannot exceed the cost of common carrier (that is normally used for transportation of remains).
Order entered March 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00567-CV

DARLENE C. AMRHEIN, Appellant

V.

ATTORNEY LENNIE F. BOLLINGER AND WORMINTON & BOLLINGER LAW 

FIRM, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-02654-2017

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 4, 2019 “Notice to Court on Filing in Forma 

Pauperis on Texas Forms with Court of Appeals & Other Outstanding Issues in 2 Appeals.” 

Appellant appears to complain of the failure of appellees to file a response brief as well as the 

appellate record, which she deems incomplete and seeks to supplement.

To the extent appellant complains of appellees’ brief, we note appellees’ brief is not due 

until March 8, 2019. To the extent appellant complains of the appellate record, the documents 

and transcriptions she asserts are missing and need to be included in a supplemental record 

concern other cases. We have denied a previous request to supplement the record with 
documents from other cases. See Greystar, LLC v. Adams, 426 S.W.3d 861, 865 (Tex. App.—

Dallas 2014, no pet.). We DENY this request also. See id. 

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 CASE NO. 

______________________________________/ 

CRIMINAL COVER SHEET

1. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the United States

Attorney's Office prior to August 8, 2014 (Mag. Judge Shaniek Maynard)? 

2. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Northern Region of the United States

Attorney's Office prior to October 3, 2019 (Mag. Judge Jared Strauss)? No

Respectfully submitted, 

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

Tel:

Email:

Bertila Lilia Fernandez

0124092

99 N.E. 4th Street

Miami, Florida 33132

305-961-9099

bertila.fernandez@usdoj.gov

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

JARVIS ANACREON, 

Assistant United States Attorney

FL Bar No.

No

By:

1:22mj03751 Becerra

Case 1:22-cr-20515-KMM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2022 Page 1 of 5
10/14/2022


14th
# Comments on: 23-2059: MONTERO v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential
667PA03-5

#### Kenneth D. Bobbitt v. Danny Safrit, Administrator, Alexander Correctional Institution and Roy A. Cooper, III, Attorney General, State of North Carolina

State’s Motion to Withdraw the Appeal

Allowed 11/24/2015