alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Well Stimulation Fluid containing the PMN Substance used by Oilfield 

Service/Pump Companies

 

Worker Activity A – Connection of 

stimulation fluid drum, proppant line 

and water container to mixing truck 

and pump truck which lead into 

oilfield well hole through the casing. 

275 gal totes of stimulation 

fluid containing up to 0.2 

wt% PMN substance, 

hydrocarbon surfactants, 

solvents, co-solvents and 

salts (1 to 20 totes per well 

– depends on well size, 

depth and amt of fluid used) 

Approximately 100,000 

to 1 million gal of water in 

a truck container/tank 

Method A – meter and pump PMN 

substance, water and fracture fluid 

components from the mixing truck, 

through pump truck and into the 

oilfield well hole. 

Mixing truck - mixes 

stimulation fluid with 

proppant and water. 

Pump truck – pumps stimulation 

fluid from mixing truck and into 

the oilfield well hole. 

ground 

Well casing 

PMN substance is used 

from 0.0003 to 0.1 wt % 

active ingredient in the 

oilfield well 

Worker Activity C – Transport and transfer 

of recovered fracture fluid (with PMN 

substance) from truck container to waste 

water treatment facility. 

Conc. of PMN 

substance in recovered 

fluid is estimated at 0.1 

wt% max (in fracture 

fluid & formation water, 

so diluted). The fluid is 

recovered by reversing 

the pressure after 

treatment is completed. 

Worker Activity B – Connection of 

piping from oilfield well casing to 

remove PMN substance/treatment 

solution after treatment is 

completed from oilfield well hole 

and into truck container/tank. 

ground 

Pay zone Pay zone
#### § 109-1.104 Publication and distribution of FPMR/FMR.
#### § 302-7.12 What is the Government's liability for loss or damage to HHG?

The Government's liability for loss or damage to HHG is determined by your agency under title 31 U.S.C. 3721-3723 and agency implementing rules and regulations issued pursuant to the law.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18340, Apr. 1, 2011]
§ 301-10.138 In what circumstances is foreign air carrier service deemed a matter of necessity? ( a ) Foreign air carrier service is deemed a necessity when service by a U.S. flag air carrier is available, but ( 1 ) Cannot provide the air transportation needed; or
( 2 ) Will not accomplish the agency's mission.
( b ) Necessity includes, but is not limited to, the following circumstances: ( 1 ) When the agency determines that use of a foreign air carrier is necessary for medical reasons, including use of foreign air carrier service to reduce the number of connections and possible delays in the transportation of persons in need of medical treatment; or
( 2 ) When use of a foreign air carrier is required to avoid an unreasonable risk to your safety and is approved by your agency (e.g., terrorist threats). Written approval of the use of foreign air carrier service based on an unreasonable risk to your safety must be approved by your agency on a case by case basis. An agency determination and approval of use of a foreign air carrier based on a threat against a U.S. flag air carrier must be supported by a travel advisory notice issued by the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of State. An agency determination and approval of use of a foreign air carrier based on a threat against Government employees or other travelers must be supported by evidence of the threat(s) that form the basis of the determination and approval; or
( 3 ) When you cannot purchase a ticket in your authorized class of service on a U.S. flag air carrier, and a seat is available in your authorized class of service on a foreign air carrier.
[FTR Amdt. 74, 63 FR 63419, Nov. 13, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61537, Oct. 31, 2007]
Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: Samuel, Kathleen A. [Kathleen.Samuel@alcoa.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:49 PM 

To: EAS (OST) 

Subject: Cape Air Service - Massena NY 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

D.O.T. Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation ~~' 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE "Q 

Washington, DC 20590 _ 

tSJ GO 

Mr. DeVany, <-^ 

As a tw/ice monthly traveler, I have had the pleasure of utilizing Cape Air flight service between Massena and Albany 

often. Their service and reliability is superior, as is their attentiveness to safety, customer needs and support of the 

communities in which they operate. 

I understand that the Town of Massena has voted to change carriers to a bankrupt carrier with service through Boston 

utilizing a larger aircraft. To me, this arrangement does not make good business sense. When I fly out of Massena my 

fellow passengers' final destination is generally Albany. The Albany connection provides access for educators, hospital 

staff and local government officials to their headquarters, eliminating overnight stays for meetings and eliminating the 

drive through the Adirondacks. For those with destinations outside the state, Albany Airport is well run and small 

enough to make even tight connections easy to make. 

The Cessna 402 aircraft utilized by Cape Air is large enough to handle 8 passengers. Rarely have I had a full flight in the 

two years I have been flying in and out of Massena. How can the larger plane offered by the newly proposed carrier be 

cost effective? Would this market really support filled flights in and out of Boston? I doubt it, and the short-term 

service with larger aircraft in the past confirms my doubts. 

Although the vote has been cast not to support Cape Air's extension bid, I understand that the FAA and D.O.T. have a say 

in the decision. Your department has most likely considered the same concerns I'm addressing here, still, I feel strongly 

that Cape Air is a good fit for Massena and was compelled to voice my concerns. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Kathleen A. Samuel 

9(}ttySaTtme{ 

Quality System Lead Auditor 

Aicoa - Lafayette Operations 

3131 Main Street 

Ufayette, iN 47905 

phone: (765) 771-3161/(315)764-4467 

fax: (765)771-3237 

mobiie: (765) 404-3844 

Home Address: 5873 Chase Mills, NY 13621 

Home Phone: (315) 769-6473
#### § 302-3.417 Will I have to pay any income tax if my agency pays for extended storage of my household goods?

You will be subject to income taxes on the amount of extended storage expenses your agency pays. However, your agency will pay you a relocation income tax allowance under part 302-17 of this chapter for substantially all of the additional Federal, State and local income taxes you incur on the expenses your agency pays.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                       25,062
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             25,062
<PP&E>                                        1,996
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               27,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       307,746
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      2,661
<OTHER-SE>                                 (283,349)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 27,058
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             21,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (21,168)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (21,168)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (21,168)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.02)


</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Cape Henry to Pamlico Sound,including Albemarle Sound, Virginia--North Carolina [electronic resource] /**
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.418/7:12205/

Item Number:0191-B-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000878597
 
1996 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002 | 2003| 2004 | 2005 | 2007| 2009 | 2012
 
April 21, 2020
No. 10-11016.

#### Cummings *v.*New York.

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 15.1

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts



|                                  |  |                 |  |                   |  |                       |  |                
|--------------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ----------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ---------------
|Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |  | Opening Balance |  | Charged toExpense |  | Charged AgainstIncome |  | Closing Balance
|Deferred tax valuation allowance  |  |                 |  |                   |  |                       |  |                
|                                  |  |                 |  |                  
|December 31, 2005                 |  | 6,028           |  |                  |  | 105                   |  | 5,923          
|                                  |  |                 |  |                  
|December 31, 2004                 |  | 6,290           |  |                  |  | 262                   |  | 6,028          
|                                  |  |                 |  |                  
|December 31, 2003                 |  | 25,038          |  |                  |  | 18,748                |  | 6,290
#### § 102-74.190 Are portable heaters, fans and other such devices allowed in Government-controlled facilities?

Federal agencies are prohibited from operating portable heaters, fans, and other such devices in Government-controlled facilities unless authorized by the Federal agency buildings manager.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 585

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the work opportunity

credit against the alternative minimum tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the

work opportunity credit against the alternative minimum tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT ALLOWED

4 AGAINST MINIMUM TAX.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 38 of the

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation

7 based on amount of tax) is amended by redesignating

8 paragraph (3) as paragraph (4) and by inserting after

9 paragraph (2) the following new paragraph:
2

•HR 585 IH

1 ‘‘(3) SPECIAL RULES FOR WORK OPPORTUNITY

2 CREDIT.—

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of the

4 work opportunity credit—

5 ‘‘(i) this section and section 39 shall

6 be applied separately with respect to the

7 credit, and

8 ‘‘(ii) in applying paragraph (1) to the

9 credit—

10 ‘‘(I) subparagraph (A) shall not

11 apply, and

12 ‘‘(II) the limitation under para13 graph (1) (as modified by subclause

14 (I)) shall be reduced by the credit al15 lowed under subsection (a) for the

16 taxable year (other than the work op17 portunity credit).

18 ‘‘(B) WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT.—For

19 purposes of this subsection, the term ‘work op20 portunity credit’ means the credit allowable

21 under subsection (a) by reason of section

22 51(a).’’

23 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subclause (II) of

24 section 38(c)(2)(A)(ii) of such Code is amended by insert-
3

•HR 585 IH

1 ing ‘‘or the work opportunity credit’’ after ‘‘employment

2 credit’’.

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

5 December 31, 1998.

Æ
#### § 102-39.5 What is the exchange/sale authority?

The exchange/sale authority is a statutory provision, (40 U.S.C. 503), which states in part: “In acquiring personal property, an executive agency may exchange or sell similar items and may apply the exchange allowance or proceeds of sale in whole or in part payment for the property acquired.”

[73 FR 50880, Aug. 29, 2008]
No. D-2671.

#### In re Discipline of Leonard.

Vann F. Leonard, of Jackson, Miss., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
#### § 105-68.25 How is this part organized?

(a) This part is subdivided into ten subparts. Each subpart contains information related to a broad topic or specific audience with special responsibilities, as shown in the following table:

| In subpart . . . | You will find provisions related to . . . |
| --- | --- |
| A | general information about this rule. |
| B | the types of GSA transactions that are covered by the Governmentwide nonprocurement suspension and debarment system. |
| C | the responsibilities of persons who participate in covered transactions. |
| D | the responsibilities of GSA officials who are authorized to enter into covered transactions. |
| E | the responsibilities of Federal agencies for the *Excluded Parties List System* (Disseminated by the General Services Administration). |
| F | the general principles governing suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion and settlement. |
| G | suspension actions. |
| H | debarment actions. |
| I | definitions of terms used in this part. |
| J | [Reserved] |

(b) The following table shows which subparts may be of special interest to you, depending on who you are:

| If you are . . . | See subpart(s) . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) a participant or principal in a nonprocurement transaction | A, B, C, and I. |
| (2) a respondent in a suspension action | A, B, F, G and I. |
| (3) a respondent in a debarment action | A, B, F, H and I. |
| (4) a suspending official | A, B, D, E, F, G and I. |
| (5) a debarring official | A, B, D, E, F, H and I. |
| (6) a (n) GSA official authorized to enter into a covered transaction | A, B, D, E and I. |
| (7) Reserved | J. |
#### § 304-4.3 Under what other authority may we accept payment for travel expenses from a non-Federal source?

You may accept payment for travel expenses to events other than meetings from a non-Federal source pursuant to an agency gift statute or similar statutory authority. However, this part 304 is the only authority you may use to accept (or authorize your employee to accept on your behalf) payment for travel expenses from a non-Federal source to attend a meeting. For example, you could not pay the travel expenses for an employee to attend a meeting and then authorize the employee to use the widely attended gathering exception in [5 CFR 2635.204(g)(2)](/on/2024-09-20/title-5/section-2635.204#p-2635.204(g)(2)) to accept free attendance at that same meeting. You would only be able to accept payment for the employee's attendance at that meeting under this part 304.

Note:

Employees may also be able to accept payment for travel expenses from non-Federal sources in their individual capacities under the authorities referenced in [§ 304-3.19](/on/2024-09-20/title-41/section-304-3.19).
No. 10-11151.

#### Winkler *v.*Clements, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 10-11119.

#### Isom *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
P. 1


# OAR Box 1865 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 42 ) IV-E-3 0 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20089:15:28AM

Sheet 42 of 105P. 2
V ~ 

# A-83-2 7
TELEPHONE CAL L REPOR T - INDUSTRIA L BOILE R S0 2 IV-E-3 0

DATE : Novembe r 4 , 198 6 TO : Ji mBraden , Plan t Manage r

Kentuck yAgricultura l Energ yCorporatio n P . 0 . Bo x 65 7 Franklin , K

Y 4213 4 (502 ) 586-958 6 FROM : J . Thoma s Waddel l SUBJECT : Reliabilit yInformatio n o n FB C Unit s Operating problem s came fro mFoste r Wheeler' s lac k o f understanding i n operating an

d designing the units . Limeston e typ e an d characteristics , th e feed coa l (washed vs . unwashe d an d sulfu r content) , a s wel l a s the reinjectio n syste

maffec t FB C uni t performanc e an d reliability . Downtime ha s resulte d fro

mabrasio n an

d stres s failure s o f the wate r tube s an d fro m stoke r jammin

g o r failure . Capacit yha s bee n los t becaus e o f protecting th e in-be d tube s fro mabrasio n an

d changing the ho t ga s flow pat h t o reduc e erosio n o f th e generating tubes . Th e unit s hav e bee n improve d t o abou t 85 % reliabilit ydurin g th e las t year .P. 3



## KENTUCK Y AGRICULTURA L ENERG Y CORPORATIO N Powe rAlcoho l • DDG S • Grai n

Jul y10 , 198 7

Mr . J . Thoma s Waddel l Chemica l Enginee r Radia n Corporatio n Progres s Cente r P . 0 . Bo x 1300 0 Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2770 9 Dea r Mr . Waddell : Thi s wil l acknowledg e your lette r o f Jun e 29 , 198 7 enclosing a cop yo f the telephon e cal l repor t betwee n yoursel f an d Mr . Ji mBrade n o f Novembe r 4 , 1986 . W e hav e reviewe d th e repor t an d attache d ar e our comment s regarding the reliabilit yinformatio n o n FB C units . Mr . Brade n i s n o longe r wit h KAEC ; therefore , i f yo u hav e an yquestions , pleas e direc t the

mt o Mr . DeweyMarsee , KAEC' s Plan t Manager .

Sincerely , 

# Vt/J*^ pjac k N . Wad e Presiden t /pl-JNW-87-5 9 Attachmen t

Post Office Box

657, Franklin, Kentucky 42134 502-586-9586
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Warren L. Mobley, President and Chief Executive Officer of Moscow CableCom Corp., certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Moscow CableCom Corp. (the Registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors:

a.

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.



Date:  August 12, 2005



/s/    Warren L. Mobley

Warren L. Mobley

President and Chief Executive Officer
228A15

#### N.C. Association of Educators, Inc., et al. v. The State of North Carolina

N.C. Retired Governmental Employees’ Association’s Motion for Leave to File *Amicus*Brief

Allowed 12/21/2015
No. 10-10940.

#### Thurston *v.*Merck & Co., Inc.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 114-51.100 Departmental Quarters Handbook.

The Office of Acquisition and Property Management (PAM) has prepared the Departmental Quarters Handbook (DQH), 400 DM, which provides detailed guidelines governing administration, management and rental rate establishment activities relating to Government furnished quarters (GFQ). Officials responsible for administration and management of quarters shall implement and comply with the provisions of the DQH, and shall ensure its availability for examination by all employees.

[60 FR 3555, Jan. 18, 1995]
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 584

To authorize and request the President to award the Medal of Honor posthumously to Brevet Brigadier General Strong Vincent for his actions

in the defense of Little Round Top at the Battle of Gettysburg, July

2, 1863.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To authorize and request the President to award the Medal

of Honor posthumously to Brevet Brigadier General

Strong Vincent for his actions in the defense of Little

Round Top at the Battle of Gettysburg, July 2, 1863.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the President is authorized and requested to award

4 (in accordance with award criteria applicable at the time)

5 the Medal of Honor posthumously to Brevet Brigadier

6 General Strong Vincent, of the State of Pennsylvania, for

7 his actions in the defense of Little Round Top at the Bat8 tle of Gettysburg on July 2, 1863. Such an award may
2

•HR 584 IH

1 be made under without regard to the provisions of section

2 3744 of title 10, United States Code.

Æ