alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


      KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints ADAM LINTER as his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and re-
substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign Tomorrow's Morning, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended June 30, 2000 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact
and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person and hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

      SIGNATURE                                TITLE                DATE
      ---------                                -----                ----


/S/ JAMES R. ROSBE                            Director          October 6, 2000
------------------------------
    JAMES R. ROSBE



/S/ RICK NICITA                               Director          October 10, 2000
------------------------------
    RICK NICITA



/S/ ALAN G. DUNN                              Director          October 4, 2000
-------------------------------
    ALAN G. DUNN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM ANACOMP,
INC.'S  DECEMBER  31, 1997 FORM 10-Q  QUARTERLY  REPORT AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         36,461
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  69,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                   5,732
<INVENTORY>                                    26,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,896
<PP&E>                                         42,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,790
<BONDS>                                        253,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       139
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,052)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,669
<SALES>                                        69,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,814
<CGS>                                          51,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,921
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15,368)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.11)
        


</TABLE>
§ 60-741.69 Intimidation and interference. ( a ) The contractor shall not harass, intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual because the individual has engaged in or may engage in any of the following activities: ( 1 ) Filing a complaint;
( 2 ) Assisting or participating in any manner in an investigation, compliance evaluation, hearing, or any other activity related to the administration of the act or any other Federal, State, or local law requiring equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities;
( 3 ) Opposing any act or practice made unlawful by the act or this part or any other Federal, State, or local law requiring equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities; or
( 4 ) Exercising any other right protected by the act or this part.
( b ) The contractor shall ensure that all persons under its control do not engage in such harassment, intimidation, threats, coercion, or discrimination. The sanctions and penalties contained in this part may be exercised by the Director against any contractor who violates this obligation.
#### § 60-40.1 Purpose and scope.

This part contains the general rules of the OFCCP providing for public access to information from records of the OFCCP or its various compliance agencies. These regulations implement 5 U.S.C. 552, the Freedom of Information Act and supplement the policy and regulations of the Department of Labor, 29 CFR part 70. It is the policy of the OFCCP to disclose information to the public and to cooperate with other public agencies as well as private parties seeking to eliminate discrimination in employment. This part sets forth generally the categories of records accessible to the public, the types of records subject to prohibitions or restrictions on disclosure, and the places at which and the procedures whereby members of the public may obtain access to and inspect and copy information from records in the custody of the OFCCP.

[43 FR 49264, Oct. 20, 1978; 43 FR 51401, Nov. 3, 1978]
No. 11-7562.

No. 11-7724.

No. 11-7750.

No. 11-7910.

No. 11-8060.

No. 11-8115.

#### Smith *v.*Byars, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al., Skinner *v.*Oklahoma et al., Gena *v.*United States, Berrettini *v.*United States, Browning *v.*United States, McNaughton *v.*Auburn Correctional Facility, *971Lotter *v.*Houston, Warden,

*970565 U. S. 1205;

565 U. S. 1209;

565 U. S. 1247;

565 U. S. 1247;

565 U. S. 1218;

565 U. S. 1248; and

*971No. 11-8458.

565 U. S. 1268. Petitions for rehearing denied.
# Comments on: 22-1139: INTEL CORPORATION v. PACT XPP SCHWEIZ AG [OPINION], Nonprecedential
#### § 301-70.103 In what circumstance may we authorize use of ship service?

Travel by ship is not generally regarded as advantageous. You must determine that the advantages accruing from the use of ocean transportation offset the higher costs associated with ship travel, *i.e.,* per diem, transportation, and lost worktime.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 126 (Thursday, June 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 40083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16453]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Performance Review Boards List of 2000 Members

    Below is a list of individuals who are eligible to serve on the 
Performance Review Boards for the Department of the Air Force in 
accordance with the Air Force Senior Executive Appraisal and Awards 
System.

Secretariat
Mr. Ronald L. Orr
Maj Gen James E. Sherrard III
Mr. Frank Tuck
Mr. Gary M. Erickson
Ms. Susan A. O'Neal
Mr. Harlan G. Wilder
Air Staff and ``Others''
Mr. William A. Davidson
Mr. Gene L. Hathenbruck
Maj Gen Larry Northington
Mr. James C. Barone
Ms. Mary Lou Keener
Mr. Anthony J. DeLuca
Air Force Materiel Command
Lt Gen Charles Coolidge
Maj Gen Claude Bolton
Mr. Harry Schulte
Dr. Donald Daniel
Mr. Pat Zarokiewicz

Janet A. Long,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-16453 Filed 6-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-U
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 761 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 761

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion in 
               gross income of Social Security benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1999

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion in 
               gross income of Social Security benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Senior Citizens Tax Elimination 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCLUSION IN GROSS INCOME OF SOCIAL SECURITY 
              BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 86 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to social security benefits) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Termination.--This section shall not apply to any taxable 
year beginning after the date of the enactment of this subsection.''
    (b) Social Security Trust Funds Held Harmless.--
            (1) In general.--There are hereby appropriated (out of any 
        money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated) for each 
        fiscal year to each fund under the Social Security Act or the 
        Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 an amount equal to the 
        reduction in the transfers to such fund for such fiscal year by 
        reason of section 86(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
            (2) No tax increases.--It is the sense of the Congress that 
        tax increases will not be used to provide the revenue necessary 
        to carry out paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
§ 51-6.8 Deletion of items from the Procurement List. ( a ) When a central nonprofit agency decides to request that the Committee delete a commodity or service from the Procurement List, it shall notify the Committee staff immediately. Before reaching a decision to request a deletion of an item from the Procurement List, the central nonprofit agency shall determine that none of its nonprofit agencies is capable and desirous of furnishing the commodity or service involved.
( b ) Except in cases where the Government is no longer procuring the item in question, the Committee shall, prior to deleting an item from the Procurement List, determine that none of the nonprofit agencies of the other central nonprofit agency is desirous and capable of furnishing the commodity or service involved.
( c ) Nonprofit agencies will normally be required to complete production of any orders for commodities on hand regardless of the decision to delete the item. Nonprofit agencies shall obtain concurrence of the contracting activity and the Committee prior to returning a purchase order to the contracting activity.
( d ) For services, a nonprofit agency shall notify the contracting activity of its intent to discontinue performance of the service 90 days in advance of the termination date to enable the contracting activity to assure continuity of the service after the nonprofit agency's discontinuance.
( e ) The Committee may delete an item from the Procurement List without a request from a central nonprofit agency if the Committee determines that none of the nonprofit agencies participating in the AbilityOne Program are capable and desirous of furnishing the commodity or service to the Government, or if the Committee decides that the commodity or service is no longer suitable for procurement from nonprofit agencies employing people who are blind or have other severe disabilities. In considering such an action, the Committee will consult with the appropriate central nonprofit agency, the nonprofit agency or agencies involved, and the contracting activity.
[56 FR 48983, Sept. 26, 1991; 56 FR 64002, Dec. 6, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 59344, Nov. 16, 1994; 71 FR 68494, Nov. 27, 2006]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 that a meeting of the Veterans' Advisory Committee on Environmental Hazards will be held on Thursday and Friday, July 27-28, 2000, VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Room 430, Washington, DC 20420. The meeting will convene at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on both days.

The purpose of the meeting is to review information relating to the health effects of exposure to ionizing radiation. The major items on the agenda for both days will be discussions and analyses of medical and scientific papers concerning the health effects of exposure to ionizing radiation. On the basis of their analyses and discussions, the Committee may make recommendations to the Secretary concerning diseases that are the result of exposure to ionizing radiation. The agenda for the second day will include planning future Committee activities and assignment of tasks among the members.

The meeting is open to the public on both days. Those who wish to attend should contact Ms. Ersie Farber-Collins of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Compensation and Pension Service, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, prior to July 27, 2000. Ms. Farber-Collins may also be reached at 202-273-7268.

                    Members of the public may submit written questions or prepared statements for review by the Committee in advance of the meeting. Submitted material must be received at least five                           ( print page 39983)                        (5) days prior to the meeting and should be sent to Ms. Farber-Collins' attention at the address given above. Those who submit material may be asked to clarify it prior to its consideration by the Committee.                

Dated: June 20, 2000.

By direction of the Secretary.

Marvin R. Eason,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-16391  Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 122 (Friday, June 23, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39103-39104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15941]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD 05-00-021]


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Severn River, 
College Creek, and Weems Creek, Annapolis, Maryland

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is implementing the special local regulations 
found at 33 CFR 100.518 during the fireworks display to be held July 4, 
2000, on the Severn River at Annapolis, Maryland. These special local 
regulations are necessary to control vessel traffic due to the confined 
nature of the waterway and expected vessel congestion during the 
fireworks display. The effect will be to restrict general navigation in 
the regulated area for the safety of spectators and vessels transiting 
the event area.

EFFECTIVE DATES: 33 CFR 100.518 is effective from 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. on 
July 4, 2000 and July 5, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Warrant Officer R. L. Houck, 
Marine Events Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard Activities Baltimore, 
2401 Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, MD 21226-1971, (410) 576-2674.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The City of Annapolis will sponsor a 
fireworks display on July 4, 2000 on the Severn River, Annapolis, 
Maryland. If the event is postponed due to weather conditions, the 
temporary special local regulations will be effective from 8 p.m. to 11 
p.m. on July 5, 2000. The fireworks display will be launched from a 
barge positioned within the regulated area. In order to ensure the 
safety of spectators and transiting vessels, 33 CFR 100.518 will be in 
effect for the duration of the event. Under provisions of 33 CFR 
100.518, a vessel may not enter the regulated area unless it receives 
permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Spectator vessels may 
anchor outside the regulated area but may not block a navigable 
channel. Because these restrictions will be in effect for a limited 
period, they should not result in a significant disruption of maritime 
traffic.


[[Page 39104]]


    Dated: June 8, 2000.
J. E. Shkor,
Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 00-15941 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
No. 10-10891.

#### Rollins *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 60-300.66 Sanctions and penalties. ( a ) *Withholding progress payments.* With the prior approval of the Director, so much of the accrued payment due on the contract or any other contract between the Government contractor and the Federal Government may be withheld as necessary to correct any violations of the provisions of the Act or this part.
( b ) *Termination.* A contract may be canceled or terminated, in whole or in part, for failure to comply with the provisions of the Act or this part.
( c ) *Debarment.* A contractor may be debarred from receiving future contracts for failure to comply with the provisions of the Act or this part subject to reinstatement pursuant to § 60-300.68. Debarment may be imposed for an indefinite period, or may be imposed for a fixed period of not less than six months but no more than three years.
( d ) *Hearing opportunity.* An opportunity for a formal hearing shall be afforded to a contractor before the imposition of any sanction or penalty.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

LUTHER KURTZ and SKYDIVE COASTAL 

CALIFORNIA d/b/a PHOENIX AREA 

SYDIVING, 

Complainant, 

v. 

CITY OF CASA GRANDE, ARIZONA, 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. 16-16-01 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby 

extended to April14, 2017. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case due to the complexity of the Record. 

or, Airport Compliance 

anagement Analysis 

4.~('!14,1017 Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 14,2017, I FedX a true copy of the foregoing 

document addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Mr. Richard J. Durden 

27987 Richmond Hill Road 

Conifer, CO 80433 

Counsel for Respondent: 

Brett D. Wallace 

City Attorney's Office 

51 0 E. Florence Blvd 

CasaGrande, AZ 85122 

Copies to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, A CO-l 00 

FAA Western Pacific Region, AWP-600 

/!ttw{/1/~·---.,· Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis
No. 10-11258.

#### Clark *v.*Bondi, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15744]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 15, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 
June 16, 2000, 5 p.m., Bethesda Holiday Inn, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the Federal Register on June 
7, 2000, 65 FR 36154-36156.
    The starting time of the meeting has been changed to 8 a.m. The 
meeting dates and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to 
the public.

    Dated: June 14, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-15744 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Order entered February 15, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00029
- CV NICHOLAS WESTERMAN, Appellant

V. POST HEIGHTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Cou rt at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 05822
- A



### O RDER By letter filed January 31, 2019, court reporter Cathye Moreno informed the Court no reporter’s record exists in this case

. Accordingly, as the clerk’s record has been filed, we ORDER appellant to file his brief on the merits no later than March 18, 2019.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
No. 11-9286.

#### Kodsy *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: 22-1426: LOPEZ v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential