alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-11-0534

SAT Date: 9/27/2011

Print Date: 5/1/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1 Health: PMN ; Eco: intact material

2 3 Health: Incineratio/degradation product ; Eco: high concerfn for toxicity o

incomplete incineration products to terrestrial organisms

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 1 1 PMN

3 3 2 Incin Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ; PMN slow; Incin Pdt rapid

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-11-0534

FATE: 

S = Disp.

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 0

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo
Sorption to soils/sediments = PMN strong; Incin Pdt low

PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Incin Pdt P3B3

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN slow; Incin Pdt rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin, nil through the lungs 

and GI tract as the neat material, and poor through the lungs and GI tract for the low molecular 

weight fraction when in solution based on physical/chemical 

properties. There is concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on changes 

of the natural surfactant balance in the lungs. Low moderate concern. 

For the potential incomplete incineration product/degradation product, based on test data for the 

analogue concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male 

reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral NOAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver 

toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all 

doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 

males in the 90-day oral study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential 

for male reproductive toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity 

based on data for Moderate concern.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100

daphnid 48-h LC50 >100

green algal 96-h EC50 >100

fish _ chronic value >10

daphnid _ chronic 

value

>10

algal _ chronic 

value

>10

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for polyanionic polymers based on 

 SAR chemical class = polymer-anionic 

with mp < 20 C (P); S = dispersible in water based on

 effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients 

and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 1000
(ppb)

SARs polyanionic polymers

SAR Class polymer-anioicEcotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
Exhibit 4.3

                    COMITE ESPECIAL DE PRIVATIZACION - CEPRI
                      CENTROMIN PERU S.A. MINERO PERU S.A.



COP-045/2001
San Borja, 11 de Abril de 2001




Senores
MANHATTAN SECHURA COMPANIA MINERA S.A.
San Isidro.-

Atencion: Sr. Roberto Obradovich

Ref.:     Su carta s/n de fecha 08 de marzo de 2001

De nuestra consideracion:

Pro medio de la presente cumplimos con informaries que mediante Acuerdo adoptado
en la  Sesion  de fecha 09 de abril de 2001,  la  Comision  de  Promocion  de la
Inversion Privada (COPRI), acordo aprobar la prorroga de la fecha de vencimiento
del Contrato de Opcion de  Constitucion  de Sociedad  Anonima,  celebrado  entre
Empresa  Minera del Peru S.A. - MINERO  PERU S.A. y  Manhattan  Minerals  Corp.,
referido al Proyecto  Minero Tambo Grande,  del 31 de mayo de 2002 al 31 de mayo
de 2003.

Sin otro particular, quedamos de ustedes.

Atentamente,

"Jorge Merino Tafur"

Jorge Merino Tafur
Presidente del CEPRI


<PAGE>


                     SPECIAL PRIVATIZATION COMMITTEE - CEPRI
                      CENTROMIN PERU S.A. MINERO PERU S.A.


COP-045/2001
------------

San Borja, April 11, 2001


Messrs.
MANHATTAN SECHURA COMPANIA MINERA S.A.
San Isidro.-

Att.: Mr. Roberto Obradovich

Ref.: Your letter dated March 8, 2001

Dear Sirs,

The  purpose of this letter is to inform you that by  resolution  adopted in its
meeting  held on April 9,  2001,  the  Private  Investment  Promotion  Committee
(COPRI) agreed to approve the extension of the term of the Option  Agreement for
the Incorporation of a Stock Company, entered into by and between Empresa Minera
del Peru S.A. - MINERO PERU S.A. - and Manhattan Minerals Corp.,  concerning the
Tambo Grande Mining Project. Accordingly, the term will be extended from May 31,
2002 to May 31, 2003.

Yours faithfully,

-(signed) Jorge Merino Tafur
Chairman of CEPRI

-------------------------------
R/M Manhattan.086
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
                            THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY
                            FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                            FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                            CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S 1997
                            FIRST QUARTER 10Q AND IS  
		            QUALIFIED BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                            FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                          217,454
<SECURITIES>                     21,798
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,044,263
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                     789,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,362,000
<PP&E>                        4,619,122
<DEPRECIATION>                2,640,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                4,652,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,401,852
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                         81,238
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                    2,709,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  4,652,711
<SALES>                       1,392,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,392,867
<CGS>                           990,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   990,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                8,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 150,114
<INCOME-TAX>                     48,786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             101,328
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                        15,450
<NET-INCOME>                    116,778
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .53
        

</TABLE>
All data has been removed from this file as a result of CBI sanitization. All data provided by vendors

regarding chemical purchase costs is considered CBI or CBI deducible.
SCWC-14-0001019

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN THE MATTER OF STEPHANIE C. STUCKY,

Petitioner/Complainant-Appellant,

v.

DWIGHT TAKENO, HSTA Interim Executive Director, RAY CAMACHO, HSTA

Deputy Executive Director, ERIC NAGAMINE, HSTA UniServ Director,

DAVID FORREST, HSTA UniServ Director, and HAWAI#I STATE TEACHERS

ASSOCIATION, 

Respondents/Respondents-Appellees

and

HAWAI#I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, State of Hawai#i, 

Respondent/Intervenor-Agency Appellee. 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0001019; CIVIL NO. 12-1-0704(2))

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Complainant-Applicant Stephanie C. Stucky’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on October 17, 2018, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 26, 2018.

 /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

 /s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

 /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

 /s/ Richard W. Pollack

 /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-14-0001019

26-NOV-2018

09:38 AM
No. 10-11116.

#### Hope *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 93-2517

GULF STATES INSURANCE CO.,

Plaintiff-Counter

Defendant-Appellee,

versus

ALAMO CARRIAGE SERVICE, ET AL., 

Defendants,

ALAMO CARRIAGE SERVICE, INC., 

Defendant-Counter

Plaintiff-Appellant.

HERJE CARLSSON,

Plaintiff,

versus

ALAMO CARRIAGE SERVICE, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant,

versus

GULF STATES INSURANCE CO., 

Intervenor-Defendant

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING

(May 12, 1994)
2

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

IT IS ORDERED that Alamo Carriage Service, Inc.'s petition for

rehearing is hereby DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED that Gulf States Insurance Co.'s petition for

rehearing is hereby GRANTED for the limited purpose of

supplementing our opinion to award sanctions and just damages under

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38, 28 U.S.C. § 1912, and the

inherent discretionary authority of this court. 

Alamo's appeal was dismissed as frivolous. Granting in part

Gulf States' motion for sanctions and damages, we award to Gulf

States, and order Alamo to pay, (1) $398 as double costs, (2) $620

as attorneys' fees and costs incurred by Gulf States in filing and

serving its petition for rehearing, and (3) $1,000 as reasonable

(but limited) attorneys' fees for sanctions.
250P15

#### The North Carolina State Bar v. Robert L. Scott, Attorney

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA14-1008)

1.—

2. Def’s *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Denied

3. Pit’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Allowed

4. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Amend Notice of Appeal and PDR

4. Allowed

5. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Amend the Face Page of the Printed Record in this Appeal

5. Allowed
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4176

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize appropriations

for refugee and entrant assistance for fiscal years 1995 and 1996.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1994

Mr. MAZZOLI (by request) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize

appropriations for refugee and entrant assistance for fiscal years 1995 and 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 414(a) of the Immigration and Nationality

4 Act is amended by striking out ‘‘fiscal year 1993 and fiscal

5 year 1994’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘for each of fiscal

6 years 1995 and 1996’’.

Æ
No. 11-8372.

#### Hatch *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 99.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Angelica Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 26, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, T. M. Armstrong, Senior Vice President - Finance &
Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

                                     /s/ T. M. Armstrong
                                     ----------------------------------
                                     T. M. Armstrong
                                     Senior Vice President -
                                     Finance & Administration and
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     of Angelica Corporation

                                     December 6, 2002
#### § 102-83.05 What does this part cover?

This part covers GSA's considerations when making location decisions for Federal agencies in both Federally owned and leased space and the considerations of those Federal agencies operating under or subject to the real property authorities of the Administrator of General Services (Administrator), including those using delegated real property authority, when making their own location decisions. It directs practices that foster the policies and programs of the Federal Government and improve the management, efficiency, and effectiveness of Government activities.
#### § 302-9.203 Is there any circumstance under which I may be authorized to transport my POV from a post of duty before completing my service agreement?

Yes, if conditions change at your post of duty such that use of your POV no longer is in the interest of the Government, or if you separate from Government service prior to completion of your service agreement for reasons beyond your control and acceptable to your agency, your agency may authorize return transportation to your authorized destination. When the return transportation is based on changed conditions, you are still required to complete your service agreement. If you do not, you will be required to repay the transportation costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          25,771
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             600
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                19,125
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    141,357
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,510
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            13,584
<LOANS>                                        268,933
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 499,859
<DEPOSITS>                                     444,210
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,203
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,379
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,142
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 499,859
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 25,159
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,145
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,320
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                34,614
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,342
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,634
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,980
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,903
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,671
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,671
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.54
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,632
<LOANS-PAST>                                       413
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,833
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,526
<RECOVERIES>                                       565
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,775
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,775
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 102-74.351 If a state or local government has a smoke-free ordinance that is more strict than the smoking policy for Federal facilities, does the state or local law or Federal policy control?

The answer depends on whether the facility is Federally owned or privately owned. If the facility is Federally owned, then Federal preemption principles apply and the Federal policy controls. If the facility is privately owned, then Federal tenants are subject to the provisions of the state or local ordinance, even in the Federally leased space, if the state or local restrictions are more stringent than the Federal policy.

[73 FR 77518, Dec. 19, 2008]
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s/Robert A. Paul
 Robert A. Paul
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 August 6, 2010
§ 109-50.107 Reporting. ( a ) Gifts made under this program shall be included in the annual report of property transferred to non-Federal recipients, as required by 41 CFR 101-43.4701(c) and 109-43.4701(c).
( b ) A copy of each equipment agreement shall be forwarded to the Director, Office of Laboratory Policy and Infrastructure Management.
# Jurnalul Oficial C 34A/31 i

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 34A |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 6131 ianuarie 2018 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 34A

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 6131 ianuarie 2018

---

| Informarea nr. | Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rectificări |
| 2018/C 34 A/01 | Rectificare la anunțul de concursuri generale EPSO/AD/354/17 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba letonă (LV) – EPSO/AD/355/17 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba malteză (MT) ( JO C 418 A, 7.12.2017 ) | 1 |

Informarea nr.

Cuprins

Pagina

Rectificări

2018/C 34 A/01

Rectificare la anunțul de concursuri generale EPSO/AD/354/17 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba letonă (LV) – EPSO/AD/355/17 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba malteză (MT) ( JO C 418 A, 7.12.2017 )

( JO C 418 A, 7.12.2017 )

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

Rectificări

| 31.1.2018 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CA 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CA 34/1

---

Rectificare la anunțul de concursuri generale

EPSO/AD/354/17 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba letonă (LV)

EPSO/AD/355/17 – Juriști-lingviști (AD 7) de limba malteză (MT)

(
  Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene C 418 A din 7 decembrie 2017
  )

(2018/C 034 A/01)

La pagina 1

în loc de:

Termenul-limită pentru înscriere: 16 ianuarie 2018, ora 12.00 (după-amiaza), ora Europei Centrale

se citește:

se citește:

Termenul-limită pentru înscriere: 30 ianuarie 2018, ora 12.00 (după-amiaza), ora Europei Centrale

La pagina 5

La pagina 5

în loc de:

în loc de:

CÂND ȘI UNDE ÎMI POT DEPUNE CANDIDATURA?

Vă puteți depune candidatura online pe site-ul web al EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu până la:

16 ianuarie 2018, ora 12.00 (după-amiaza), ora Europei Centrale

se citește:

se citește:

CÂND ȘI UNDE ÎMI POT DEPUNE CANDIDATURA?

Vă puteți depune candidatura online pe site-ul web al EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu până la:

30 ianuarie 2018, ora 12.00 (după-amiaza), ora Europei Centrale

---
026P14-2

#### William Thomas Fox and Scott Everett Sanders v. Mitchell Johnson, Timothy R. Bellamy, Gary W. Hastings, and Martha T. Kelly, in their individual capacities

1. Defs’ PDR under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-206)

1. Denied

2. N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys’ Conditional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief

2. Dismissed as moot

Edmunds, J.,

recused

Ervin, J.,

recused
404 A.2d 1358

#### Commonwealth v. Larry Williams, Appellant.

Submitted March 31, 1978.

George B. Ditter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; James A. Cunningham, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Order and judgment of sentence affirmed.

SPAETH, J., concurred in the result.

JACOBS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
# Comments on: 2018-1979: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
No. 10-10925.

#### Langhorne *v.*Diggs, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: 18-1796: LABIO v. OPM [OPINION], Nonprecedential
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7434
RONALD BRUNT, a/k/a Ronald Brount, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOHN B. TAYLOR, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-00-730) Submitted: December 21, 2001 Decided: January 14, 2002 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Brunt, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994). 2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Brunt appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Brunt v. Taylor , No. CA-00-730 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Analogic Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John J. Millerick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 9, 2008



/s/ John J. MillerickJohn J. MillerickChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)