alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of National Grid plc;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to
the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the
companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation;
and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any
change in the companys internal
control over financial reporting
that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially
affect, the companys internal
control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to
record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management
or other employees who have a
significant role in the companys
internal control over financial
reporting.
 June 20, 2006
    
    /s/  Roger UrwinRoger UrwinGroup Chief Executive
Scaling Checklists: Assessing your Level of Evidence 

and Readiness (SCALER) Discussion Guide

Use this discussion guide to identify actions to take to strengthen your 

organization’s scaling readiness as a result of your SCALER scores. The following 

questions can help your organization’s personnel interpret your scores and 

identify actions to take.

In general, completing the SCALER two or three times a year allows 

organizations to track their scaling readiness over time. Feel free to use this 

worksheet each time you complete the SCALER to help you interpret your 

scores and identify next steps.

Intervention name:

SCALER owner (personnel member responsible for SCALER):

Other personnel who helped complete SCALER: 

Date of SCALER completion: 

1. In what areas are we the strongest? In which areas do we appear to need more work? Are there 

specific SCALER items on which we should concentrate our efforts for improvement? (This may 

include identifying evidence of effectiveness, building evidence of effectiveness, or furthering our 

scaling readiness.)

2. We need additional information to complete any parts of the SCALER? Are there any items that we 

don’t know the answers to? If so, how can we go about identifying the information needed for those 

items?
3. In what areas or conditions, if any, do we have differences of opinion? What information can we draw 

upon to resolve those differences?

4. Who are the stakeholders (such as organization leadership or external stakeholders) with whom we 

should discuss these results? 

5. What next steps should we take to identify or build evidence of intervention effectiveness, or 

strengthen our scaling readiness (as appropriate)? Which steps are highest and lowest priority? What 

is our timeline for taking action? 

6. What partners could we bring in to build capacity in certain components? Should we seek to identify 

new partners to help gain this capacity?
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 3-(3)


                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                         WOLVERINE EXPLORATION COMPANY

     WOLVERINE EXPLORATION COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under 
the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), hereby certifies as 
follows:

     FIRST.  The Board of Directors of the Corporation, at a meeting duly held, 
adopted resolutions adopting the following amendment to the Corporation's 
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the "Certificate of Incorporation"), 
which amends Article ONE:

     Article ONE relating to the corporate name of the Corporation is hereby 
amended to read as follows:

     "ARTICLE ONE
     The name of the Corporation is Amerac Energy Corporation."

     SECOND.  The foregoing amendment has been duly approved and adopted in 
accordance with the provisions of Section 211 and 242 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WOLVERINE EXPLORATION COMPANY HAS CAUSED THIS 
CERTIFICATE TO BE EXECUTED BY JEFFREY L. STEVENS, its Senior Vice President - 
Finance and Corporate Secretary, this 16th day of March, 1995.

                                       WOLVERINE EXPLORATION COMPANY


                                       By:     /s/ Jeffrey L. Stevens
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Jeffrey L. Stevens, Senior Vice
                                          President-Finance and Corporate
                                          Secretary
#### § 105-64.109 How does GSA handle other agencies' records?

In cases where GSA has either permanent or temporary custody of other agencies' records, system managers will coordinate with those agencies on any release of information. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) records that are in GSA's custody are subject to OPM's Privacy Act rules.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida

ANTON U. PARDINI, as Personal Representative of 

the Estate of JUDITH R. PARDINI

OCEANIA CRUISES S. de R.L., d/b/a OCEANIA 

CRUISES

OCEANIA CRUISES S. de R.L., d/b/a OCEANIA CRUISES 

by serving registered agent: 

Daniel S. Farkas, Esq. 

7665 Corporate Center Drive 

Miami, FL 33126

Andrew P. Rodriguez, Esq. and Manuel A. Reboso, Esq., Rossman, Baumberger, 

Reboso & Spier, P.A., 9155 S. Dadeland Blvd, Suite 1200, Miami, FL 33156 AND 

Philip D. Parrish, Esq., Philip D. Parrish P.A., 7301 SW 57th Court, Suite 430, Miami, 

FL 33143; Rodriguez@rbrlaw.com; Reboso@rbrlaw.com; Rachel@rbrlaw.com; 

Phil@parrishappeals.com; Betty@parrishappeals.com 

1:22-cv-23918-RNS

Dec 2, 2022 s/ N. Wilner

Case 1:22-cv-23918-RNS Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1653]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION


Revised Jurisdictional Thresholds for Section 8 of the Clayton 
Act

AGENCY:  Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Federal Trade Commission announces the revised thresholds 
for interlocking directorates required by the 1990 amendment of section 
8 of the Clayton Act. Section 8 prohibits, with certain exceptions, one 
person from serving as a director or officer of two competing 
corporations if two thresholds are met. Competitor corporations are 
covered by section 8 if each one has capital, surplus, and undivided 
profits aggregating more than $10,000,000, with the exception that no 
corporation is covered if the competitive sales of either corporation 
are less than $1,000,000. Section 8(a)(5) requires the Federal Trade 
Commission to revise those thresholds annually, based on the change in 
gross national product. The new thresholds, which take effect 
immediately, are $16,732,000 for section 8(a)(1), and $1,673,200 for 
section 8(a)(2)(A).

EFFECTIVE DATE:  January 24, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  H. Gabriel Dagen, Bureau of 
Competition, Office of Accounting and Financial Analysis, (202) 326-
2573.

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 19(a)(5).

    By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1653 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
§ 301-74.13 What policies and procedures must we establish to govern the selection of conference attendees? You must establish policies that reduce the overall cost of conference attendance. The policies and procedures must: ( a ) Limit your agency's representation to the minimum number of attendees determined by a senior official necessary to accomplish your agency's mission; and
( b ) Provide for the consideration of travel expenses when selecting attendees.
[FTR Amdt. 89, 65 FR 1327, Jan. 10, 2000. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2013-01, 78 FR 65212, Oct. 31, 2013]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99(a)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                         OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB
                         OF PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002


The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.
(the "Issuer"). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of the Issuer for the year ended December 31, 2002.

I, John D. Bair, certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc., and will be retained by Pinnacle Data
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request

This certification is executed as of March 25, 2003.



                                        /s/ John D. Bair
                                        ------------------------
                                        Chief Executive Officer
181A93-4

#### State v. Rayford Lewis Burke (DEATH)

1. Defs Motion to Hold PWC in Abeyance

1. Dismissed as moot

2. Defs PWC to Review Order of Superior Court of Iredell County

2. Allowed

3. State’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Responses

3. Allowed 10/09/2014

Ervin, J.,

recused
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|               |  |                            
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:          |  |                            
|March 31, 2008 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|               |  |                            
|               |  | John P. Manning            
|               |  | Principal Executive Officer
|               |  |                            
|               |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23(b)

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement under
the Securities Act of 1933, on Form S-8 (file number 333-33214) and on Form S-8
(file number 333-47824), of our report dated February 5, 2002 relating to the
balance sheet of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 2001, and the
related statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year
then ended, which report appears in the report on Form 10-KSB of Pinnacle Data
Systems, Inc.

                                                        /s/ HAUSSER + TAYLOR LLP



Columbus, Ohio
March 26, 2003
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Munawar Hidayatallah, certify that:          1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A ofAllis-Chalmers Energy Inc.; and          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.        Date: December 29, 2006 *By /s/ Munawar H. Hidayatallah*   *Munawar H. Hidayatallah*   *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman*
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 5819 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 166

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

c ost

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 1. 

### 5 $ 127.50 $0 $ 127.50 

### 986 $ 125,715.00

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 125,715



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$8 5/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analys is ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant reg ulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Expla nation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No an swer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Helvetia Asset Recovery s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 25, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00012

- CV

Burton KAHN

, Appellant

v.

HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY INC.

,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 18355

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion , Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

The panel has considered the appellant's motion for rehearing, and the motion is

DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on August 25, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________ ________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

     Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned  officer of Tanger GP Trust,  sole
general   partner  of  Tanger   Properties   Limited   Partnership   ("Operating
Partnership") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

          (i) the  accompanying  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of the  Operating
     Partnership  for the year ended  December  31,  2004 (the  "Report")  fully
     complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or Section  15(d),  as
     applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (ii) the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Operating Partnership.

Pursuant to the rules and  regulations  of the Securities  Exchange  Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.


     Dated: March 14, 2005       /s/ Stanley K. Tanger
            --------------           ---------------------
                                     Stanley K. Tanger
                                     Chief Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust,
                                     Sole General Partner of the Registrant
Hypothetical AmeriCorps Literacy Program Description

A large body of research conducted over the last half-century has supported the importance of early 

childhood literacy. According to the research, mastering literacy before third grade is imperative and 

further assistance in facilitating early childhood literacy is needed by many schools. To meet this need, a

school district in California is implementing a literacy program in several of their schools. For this 

program, AmeriCorps members will deliver one-on-one tutoring using research-based interventions for 

students that are not reading at pre-established targets. Once students are scoring on benchmark, they 

are graduated from the tutoring program. 

Program Logic Model

Project Resources Core Project 

Components

Evidence of Project 

Implementation 

and Participation

Evidence of Change

INPUTS ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS Outcomes

Short-Term Medium-Term Long-Term

What we invest (# 

and type of 

AmeriCorps 

members)

What we do Direct products 

from program 

activities

Changes in 

knowledge, skills, 

attitudes, 

opinions

Changes in 

behavior or action 

that result from 

participants’ new 

knowledge

Meaningful 

changes, often in 

their condition or 

status in life

Funding 

Staff

100 AmeriCorps 

State and National 

members

75 nonAmeriCorps 

Volunteers 

Research

One-on-one 

tutoring to 

students below 

benchmark

Number of 

students receiving 

tutoring assistance

Increase in 

number of 

students scoring 

at or above 

benchmark on 

literacy 

assessments

Improved student 

self-efficacy

Increase in 

number of 

students reading 

on grade level

Students maintain 

grade level 

proficiency in 

reading
§ 102-38.160 What must be included in the offer to sell? The offer to sell must include— ( a ) Sale date and time;
( b ) Method of sale;
( c ) Description of property being offered for sale;
( d ) Selling agency;
( e ) Location of property;
( f ) Time and place for receipt of bids;
( g ) Acceptable forms of bid deposits and payments; and
( h ) Terms and conditions of sale, including any specific restrictions and limitations.