alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                                   Exhibit 27

                    TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, L.P.
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE


     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
financial  statements of Time Warner Entertainment  Company,  L.P. for the three
months  ended March 31, 2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000893657
<NAME>                                  TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    360
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           3,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                              685
<INVENTORY>                                             3,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        4,584
<PP&E>                                                 10,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                          4,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         24,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   5,284
<BONDS>                                                 6,648
<COMMON>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                              6,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           24,272
<SALES>                                                 3,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        3,297
<CGS>                                                   2,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           2,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           258
<INCOME-TAX>                                               36
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       222
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              222
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0




</TABLE>
#### § 102-194.10 What is a Standard form?

A Standard form is a fixed or sequential order of data elements, prescribed by a Federal agency through regulation, approved by GSA for mandatory use, and assigned a Standard form number. This criterion is the same whether the form resides on paper or purely electronic.
# Comments on: 2020-1270: KEYnetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 705

AN ACT

To make technical corrections with respect to the

resentatives.General on official mail of the House of Repmonthly reports submitted by the Postmaster
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 705

AN ACT

To make technical corrections with respect to the monthly

reports submitted by the Postmaster General on official

mail of the House of Representatives.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 705 EH

1 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS REGARDING RE2 PORTS BY POSTMASTER GENERAL ON OFFI3 CIAL MAIL OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 311(b)(2) of the Legisla5 tive Branch Appropriations Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C.

6 59e(b)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘any person with an

7 allocation under subsection (a)(2)’’ and inserting the fol8 lowing: ‘‘any person with an allocation under subsection

9 (a)(2)(A) as to the amount that has been used and any

10 person with an allocation under subsection (a)(2)(B)’’.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to January 1999

13 and each succeeding month.

Passed the House of Representatives February 11,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 11-1081.

#### Barnard et al. *v.*Verizon Communications, Inc., et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.4


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Jay C. Horgen, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 31, 2015





/s/ JAY C. HORGENJay C. HorgenChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Fw: For the ozone NAAQS docket . Fw: Ozone documents 1

Tricia Crabtree to: crabtree.tricia 07/13/2010 09:48 AM

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Tricia Crabtree" <crabtree.tricia@epa.gov>, "Susan Stone" <stone.susan@epa.gov>

Date: 07/01/2010 08:12 PM

Subject: For the ozone NAAQS docket. Fw: Ozone documents 1

This and the next two e-mails contain documents that API gave to Janet McCabe 

at the meeting with her and Rob on June 18. Thanks. 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Khary Cauthen" [cauthenk@api.org]

Sent: 07/01/2010 04:58 PM AST

To: Rob Brenner; Lydia Wegman

Subject: Ozone documents 1

Sorry that I can't figure out how to get all these into one email, so this is 

the first of three emails : )

I think that this covers all that was mentioned at our meeting last Friday.

Happy Independence Day 

Khary Cauthen

202-682-8209

This e-mail is intended only for the individual to whom it is addressed and 

may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from 

disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this communication in 

error, please delete the email from your system and notify me immediately.
**Exhibit (32)**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002In connection with this quarterly report of American Greetings Corporation on Form 10-Q as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of American Greetings Corporation.July 5, 2007   /s/ Zev Weiss   Zev Weiss  Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)     /s/ Stephen J. Smith   Stephen J. Smith  Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
#### § 301-51.1 How must I use the Government contractor-issued travel charge card?

You are required to activate the Government contractor-issued travel charge card once you receive it, and then use it as the method of payment for all official travel expenses unless exempted under § 301-51.2.

[FTR Amdt. 2016-01, 81 FR 63138, Sept. 14, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         238,994
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               238,994
<PP&E>                                         221,210
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 475,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,014
<OTHER-SE>                                     399,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   475,745
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (10,732,375)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,692,070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,692,070)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.14)


</TABLE>
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 29 , 20 11

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 1 1

- 00 809

- CR NO. 14

- 11

- 00810

- CR

____________ ERIC A. PEREZ , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1300489 & 1300490



### MEMORANDUM OP IN ION

Appellant entered guilty plea s to theft and possession of prohibited weapons

. In
accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on the theft charge to confinement for six months in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

. Consistent with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on the possession2

charge to confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department
of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed pro se notice s of appeal. We dismiss the appeal s

.
The trial court entered certification s of the defendant ’ s right to appeal in which the
court certified that th ese are plea bargain case s , and the defendant has no right of appeal.
See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court ’ s certificat ion is included in the record in
each appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record s support the trial court ’ s certification s

. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal s

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Jamison

. Do Not Publish

— T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ANTONIO GOMEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-30173

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-06051-WFN-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Wm. Fremming Nielsen, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 15, 2011

Seattle, Washington

Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Based on the affidavit in support of the application for the search warrant,

under the totality of the circumstances, there was a “fair probability that

contraband or evidence of a crime” would have been found at the North Hugo

FILED

APR 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Avenue property. Thus, the magistrate had a substantial basis to determine that

probable cause existed. See generally United States v. Crews, 502 F.3d 1130, 1135

(9th Cir. 2007); Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983). 

Because the search warrant authorized officers to search for “any and all

paperwork, documents, vehicle registrations, driver’s licenses, or identification

cards with the names Sergio Betel Gomez, Antonio Gomez or any combination

thereof” on them, the search of the rag was within the scope of the warrant. Cf.

United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654 (9th Cir. 1984) (“It is axiomatic

that if a warrant sufficiently describes the premises to be searched, this will justify

a search of the personal effects therein belonging to the person occupying the

premises if those objects might contain the items described in the warrant.”

(emphasis added)). A driver’s license with a false name, or several, might well be

concealed in a rag.

Also, the officer was performing “an otherwise lawful search” for the items

specified in the warrant, and would immediately recognize the item in the rag by

feel as evidence of a crime. Thus, under the “plain touch” exception to the
3

exclusionary rule, the district court did not err in refusing to suppress the firearm. 

See Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.



































_________________________


Robert A.
Paul


Chairman
and


Chief
Executive Officer


November 7,
2008
362P15

#### Bryant T. Dennings v. Earl R. Butler, Cumberland Co., and State of North Carolina

Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Denied 10/29/2015
No. 10-11138.

#### Lopez *v.*Small, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 83-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/17/2023   Page 1 of 1
#### § 302-6.13 What is the latest period for which TQSE reimbursement may begin?

The period must begin before the maximum time for completing all aspects of your relocation under § 302-2.9.
No. 10-11033.

#### Mitchell *v.*Lempke, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of American Science & Engineering, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge and
belief, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Ralph S. Sheridan
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------- |  | 
|February 14, 2003                         |  | 

---

QuickLinks
No. 11-9502.

#### Garcia *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 101-4.535 Effect of state or local law or other requirements. ( a ) *Prohibitory requirements.* The obligation to comply with §§ 101-4.500 through 101-4.550 is not obviated or alleviated by the existence of any State or local law or other requirement that imposes prohibitions or limits upon employment of members of one sex that are not imposed upon members of the other sex.
( b ) *Benefits.* A recipient that provides any compensation, service, or benefit to members of one sex pursuant to a State or local law or other requirement shall provide the same compensation, service, or benefit to members of the other sex.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                   K & G MEN'S CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON
                          AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                               --------------------------------------
                                JANUARY 29,  JANUARY 28,  FEBRUARY 2,
                                   1995         1996         1997
                               ------------  -----------  -----------
<S>                            <C>           <C>          <C>
Weighted average common
  and common equivalent
  shares outstanding/1/          6,615,000     7,875,000    7,875,000

Issuance of common stock
  in T&C Acquisition               630,000             0            0

Initial public offering                  0             0    1,691,250

Issuance of Common Stock                 0             0      116,070
                                 ---------    ----------    ---------
Weighted average common
  and common equivalent
  shares outstanding             7,245,000     7,875,000    9,682,320
                                 ---------    ----------    ---------
Net Income                       2,298,000     3,186,000    4,584,000
                                 ---------    ----------    ---------
Net income per common and
  common equivalent
  shares outstanding                 $0.32         $0.40         0.47
                                 =========    ==========    =========
</TABLE>
----------------

/1/  The weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares
     outstanding for all periods presented includes the effects of the August
     1994 stock dividend and December 1995 and March 1997 stock splits, effected
     as stock dividends. In addition, the Redeemable Common Stock Series B is
     considered a common Stock equivalent and has been reflected on an as-if-
     converted basis in all periods presented.
#### § 302-7.304 Who makes arrangements for transporting my UAB?

Your agency or your agency's designee should arrange for the transport of your UAB. In limited situations, the agency may ask the employee to make the arrangements for a UAB shipment.
TS- CCGL81



### Attachment #7 Pt. 2, Sec. B, 1a Processing and End Use Information on the New Chemical Substance s at Industrial Sites Controlled by OthersTS - CCGL81 Attachment #7 **Processing Information on the New Chemical**  **Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled**  **by Others**
**– Flowback Aid Products** TS - CCGL81 Attachment #7 **Processing Information on the New Chemical**  **Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled**  **by Others**
**– Use in Cleaning Products** TS - CCGL81 Attachment #7 **Processing Information on the New Chemical**  **Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled**  **by Others**
**– Use in**  **Liquid Soaps**TS - CCGL81 Attachment #7 **Processing Information on the New Chemical**  **Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled**  **by Others**
**– Agricultural/Crop Products**
<PAGE>









                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of Impax
Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth
below, hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.






                                            /s/ Cornel C. Spiegler
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                               Cornel C. Spiegler
                                             Chief Financial Officer



                                               March 12, 2004
                                   ---------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO.: 22-cv-62219-WPD

JAMIL HINDI, individually and

on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

MODANI FORT LAUDERDALE, LLC,

Defendant.

/

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With 

Prejudice [DE 16], filed herein on January 23, 2023. The Court has reviewed the Joint 

Stipulation and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Joint Stipulation [DE 16] is APPROVED.

2. All claims by Plaintiff individually are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with 

each party to bear its own costs and fees except as otherwise agreed. All claims of the 

putative class are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending 

motions.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 23rd day of January, 2023. 

Case 0:22-cv-62219-WPD Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2023 Page 1 of 2
Copies furnished to:

Counsel of record

Case 0:22-cv-62219-WPD Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2023 Page 2 of 2