alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**






In
      connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of AMERCO
      and
      U-Haul International, Inc. (together, the “Company”), as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Edward
      J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and President of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







AMERCO,


a
      Nevada
      corporation




/s/
      Edward J. Shoen


Edward
      J.
      Shoen


President
      and Chairman of the Board


Date:
      August 8, 2007








U-HAUL
      INTERNATIONAL, INC.,


a
      Nevada
      corporation





/s/
      Edward J.
      Shoen


Edward
      J.
      Shoen


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chairman of


the
      Board


Date:
      August 8, 2007
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5636

To provide compensation for injury and property damages suffered by persons

as a result of the bombing attack by the United States on August

20, 1998 in Khartoum, Sudan, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 14, 2000

Mr. ROHRABACHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide compensation for injury and property damages

suffered by persons as a result of the bombing attack

by the United States on August 20, 1998 in Khartoum,

Sudan, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

4 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, from

5 amounts in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such

6 sum as necessary up to a total amount of $50,000,000

7 in settlement of claims by persons suffering injury or

8 property loss as a result of the missile attack in Khar-
2

HR 5636 IH

1 toum, Sudan, on August 20, 1998, by the Armed Forces

2 of the United States. Such payments shall be in full satis3 faction of these claims.

4 SEC. 2.

5 The Secretary of the Treasury shall not pay any

6 claim filed against the United States or any agency thereof

7 later than 60 days after reference of this bill to the Court

8 of Claims pursuant to section 1492 of title 28, United

9 States Code.

10 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES.

11 No part of the amounts appropriated under section

12 1 in excess of 10 percent thereof shall be paid or delivered

13 to or received by any agent or attorney on account of serv14 ices rendered in connection with the claim referred to in

15 section 1, and the same shall be unlawful, any contract

16 to the contrary notwithstanding. Any person violating the

17 provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor

18 and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not

19 to exceed $1,000.

Æ
No. 11-9173.

#### Hall *v.*Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO HAC VICE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Jessica Stebbins Bina of the law firm Latham & Watkins 

LLP appears as counsel for Defendant Lawrence Gene David, and requests that all papers served 

in this case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Per Rule 4(b)(4) of the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and 

Discipline of Attorneys for the Southern District of Florida, Ms. Stebbins Bina was previously 

admitted to appear pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendants Thomas Brady and Gisele 

Bündchen and states that all information provided in support of her initial pro hac vice motion 

remains current and correct, including the sponsoring co-counsel.

Dated: April 6, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Roberto Martínez

Roberto Martínez

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Florida Bar No. 305596 

Email: bob@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Lawrence Gene David

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 643

To redesignate the Federal building located at 10301 South Compton Avenue,

in Los Angeles, California, and known as the Watts Finance Office,

as the ‘‘Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1999

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD (for herself, Mr. BECERRA, Ms. PELOSI, Ms.

LEE, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. BERMAN,

Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr.

HORN, Mr. ROGAN, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. CALVERT, and Mr. FARR of

California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To redesignate the Federal building located at 10301 South

Compton Avenue, in Los Angeles, California, and known

as the Watts Finance Office, as the ‘‘Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 10301 South Comp5 ton Avenue, in Los Angeles, California, and known as the
2

•HR 643 IH

1 Watts Finance Office, shall be known and designated as

2 the ‘‘Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office Building’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

6 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

7 a reference to the ‘‘Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office

8 Building’’.

Æ
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 3, 2024

NO. 03

- 24

- 00017

- CV

J. H. and A. L. , Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFOR E CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the final order terminating parental rights signed by the tr i a l court on

December 29, 2023

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that

there was no reversible error in the order

. Therefore, the C our t affirms the trial court’s final

order of terminati o n

. Because appellant s are indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on

of costs is made.
§ 302-17.60 How are the terms “Year 1” and “Year 2” used in the two-year RITA process? ( a ) Year 1 is the calendar year in which the agency reimburses you for a specific expense, provides an allowance, or pays a vendor directly. If your reimbursements, allowances, and/or direct payments to vendors occur in more than one calendar year, you will have more than one Year 1.
( b ) Year 2 is the calendar year in which you submit your RITA claim and your agency pays your RITA to you.
( c ) In most cases: ( 1 ) For every Year 1 you will have a corresponding Year 2;
( 2 ) Every Year 2 immediately follows a Year 1; and
( 3 ) Year 2 is the year in which you file a tax return reflecting your remaining tax liability for taxable reimbursement(s), allowance(s), and/or direct payments to vendors in each Year 1.
[FTR Amdt. 2014-01, 79 FR 49645, Aug. 21, 2014, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2020-02, 84 FR 64783, Nov. 25, 2019]
#### § 302-11.320 How must I request reimbursement for settlement of an unexpired lease?

To request reimbursement for settlement of an unexpired lease, you must itemize expenses (list all expenses separately) on a travel voucher and submit the voucher to your agency.
§ 105-8.170-4 Filing a complaint. ( a ) *Who may file a complaint.* Any person who believes that he or she has been subjected to discrimination prohibited by this part may by him or herself or by his or her authorized representative file a complaint with the Official. Any persons who believes that any specific class of persons has been subjected to discrimination prohibited by this part and who is a member of that class or the authorized representative of a member of that class may file a complaint with the Official.
( b ) *Confidentiality.* The Official shall hold in confidence the identity of any person submitting a complaint, unless the person submits written authorization otherwise, and except to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of this part, including the conduct of any investigation, hearing, or proceeding under this part.
( c ) *When to file.* Complaints shall be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The Official may extend this time limit for good cause shown. For purposes of determining when a complaint is timely filed under this section, a complaint mailed to the agency shall be deemed filed on the date it is postmarked. Any other complaint shall be deemed filed on the date it is recevied by the agency.
( d ) *How to file.* Complaints may be delivered or mailed to the Administrator, the Responsible Official, or other agency officials. Complaints should be sent to the Director of Civil Rights, Civil Rights Division (AKC), General Services Administration, 18th and F Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20405. If any agency official other than the Official receives a complaint, he or she shall forward the complaint to the Official immediately.
#### § 109-39.105 Discontinuance or curtailment of service.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 75 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 75

  To schedule Gamma y-hydroxybutyrate in schedule I of the Controlled 
Substances Act and to schedule Ketamine in schedule II of such Act and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 
  on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To schedule Gamma y-hydroxybutyrate in schedule I of the Controlled 
Substances Act and to schedule Ketamine in schedule II of such Act and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hillory J. Farias Date Rape 
Prevention Drug Act''.

SEC. 2. DRUG SCHEDULING.

    The Attorney General shall schedule Gamma y-hydroxybutyrate in 
schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and shall 
schedule Ketamine in schedule II of such Act.

SEC. 3. EDUCATION AND DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION.

    The Attorney General shall establish programs throughout the United 
States and disseminate materials to provide young people in high school 
and college with education about the use of controlled substances in 
the furtherance of rape and sexual assault and shall assist law 
enforcement personnel in the prevention of abuse of controlled 
substances for such purpose.
                                 <all>
```
#### Heriberto Arevalo ROBLES v. STATE

CR-14-0119

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

03/06/2015

Affirmed
msn-ex10351_55.htm



 

Exhibit 10.35.1

 

EMERSON RADIO CORP.

35 Waterview Blvd., Suite 140

Parsippany, NJ 07054

 

October 7th, 2019

RE:Retention Bonus

 

Dear Mr. Binney:

 

On behalf of Emerson Radio Corp. (the “Company”), I am pleased to inform you that as an incentive for your continued service to the Company, you are eligible to receive and earn a retention bonus in the aggregate amount of US$60,000 (the “Retention Bonus”), which amount shall be paid to you in the form of a lump sum cash payment, less all applicable tax withholdings and required deductions, as soon as practicable following the date that you execute this letter (the “Effective Date”).

 

The Retention Bonus will be earned in three equal installments of US$20,000 on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the Effective Date (each, an “Annual Installment”). If your employment with the Company terminates prior to the third anniversary of the Effective Date for any reason other than due to your death, a serious decline in your physical health or in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in the Indemnification Agreement by and between you and the Company), you will be required to repay the Company, in immediately available funds, an amount equal to any Annual Installment, less any amounts withheld by the Company for income and employment taxes, that has not been earned within thirty (30) days of your termination date. This letter is not a contract of employment and does not guarantee you employment for any specified period of time.

 

Please indicate your understanding and agreement with the above by signing this letter and returning it to the Company. Thank you for your contributions thus far and the contributions we know that you will make to the Company in the time ahead.

 

Very truly yours,

 

EMERSON RADIO CORP.

 

/s/ Duncan Hon

Duncan Hon, Chief Executive Officer

 

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

 

/s/ Michael Binney
Michael Binney

Date: 7/Oct/2019
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

d0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

137387 & (57) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137387 

 COA: 277098 

Wayne CC: 06-008379-01 

CARLOS EMANUEL COLLINS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 10, 2004 (the Report), I, Kenneth J. Martin, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 10, 2004

                                 By /s/       Kenneth J. Martin
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                              Kenneth J. Martin
                                           Executive Vice President
                                          and Chief Financial Officer
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN

(Christian Ogoro)

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Christian Ogoro.

Dated this 1st day of March 2023.

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 301-10.135 When must I travel using U.S. flag air carrier service? You are required by 49 U.S.C. 40118, commonly referred to as the “Fly America Act,” to use U.S. flag air carrier service for all air travel funded by the U.S. Government, except as provided in §§ 301-10.136 and 301-10.137 or when one of the following exceptions applies: ( a ) Use of a foreign air carrier is determined to be a matter of necessity in accordance with § 301-10.138; or
( b ) The transportation is provided under a bilateral or multilateral air transportation agreement to which the United States Government and the government of a foreign country are parties, and which the Department of Transportation has determined meets the requirements of the Fly America Act. ( 1 ) Information on bilateral or multilateral air transportation agreements impacting United States Government procured transportation can be accessed at *https://www.gsa.gov/openskies*; and
( 2 ) If determined appropriate, GSA may periodically issue FTR Bulletins providing further guidance on bilateral or multilateral air transportation agreements impacting United States Government procured transportation. These bulletins may be accessed at *https://www.gsa.gov/ftrbulletins .*
( c ) You are an officer or employee of the Department of State or the United States Agency for International Development, and your travel is paid with funds appropriated to one of these agencies, and your travel is between two places outside the United States; or
( d ) No U.S. flag air carrier provides service on a particular leg of the route, in which case foreign air carrier service may be used, but only to or from the nearest interchange point on a usually traveled route to connect with U.S. flag air carrier service; or
( e ) A U.S. flag air carrier involuntarily reroutes your travel on a foreign air carrier; or
( f ) Service on a foreign air carrier would be three hours or less, and use of the U.S. flag air carrier would at least double your en route travel time; or
( g ) When the costs of transportation are reimbursed in full by a third party, such as a foreign government, international agency, or other organization.
[FTR Amdt. 74, 63 FR 63419, Nov. 13, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2009-02, 74 FR 2397, Jan. 15, 2009; 85 FR 39848, July 2, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 765 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 765

  To amend the Poultry Products Inspection Act to cover birds of the 
          order Ratitae that are raised for use as human food.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1999

 Mr. Thompson of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. Bishop, and Mr. Shows) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                              Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Poultry Products Inspection Act to cover birds of the 
          order Ratitae that are raised for use as human food.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF DEFINITION OF POULTRY TO INCLUDE RATITES.

    (a) Definition of Poultry.--Section 4(e) of the Poultry Products 
Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 453(e)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new sentence: ``The term includes birds of the order Ratitae, 
such as ostriches, emus, and rheas, that are raised for distribution in 
commerce as human food.''.
    (b) Implementation of Amendment.--Beginning 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, establishments in the United States that 
slaughter or process birds of the order Ratitae for distribution in 
commerce as human food shall be subject to the ante mortem and post 
mortem inspection, reinspection and sanitation requirements of the 
Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.) rather than the 
voluntary poultry inspection program of the Department of Agriculture 
under section 203 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 
1622).
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2322** 

JIMMIE ECHOLS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Elizabeth City

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 2:14

- cv - 00040

- FL )

Submitted : February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jimmie Echols, Appellant Pro Se. David Gerald Cahill, Caroline P. Mackie, POYNER SPRUILL LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kristen Price Miller, POYNER SPRUILL LLP, Rocky Mount, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jimmie Echols appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil
action . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Echols v. Branch Banking & Trust , No. 2:14

- cv - 00040

- FL (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 30, 2015, entered Oct. 1, 2015). We dispen se with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ending May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory P. Chandler,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Gregory P. ChandlerChief
      Financial OfficerJuly
      15, 2009