alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMREP  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned
does hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  December 10, 2007

  /s/ Peter M. Pizza
--------------------------
Peter M. Pizza*
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

  /s/ James Wall
--------------------------
James Wall*

  /s/ Michael P. Duloc
--------------------------
Michael P. Duloc*



--------------
*The  registrant  is a  holding  company  which  does  substantially  all of its
business   through   two   indirect   wholly-owned   subsidiaries   (and   their
subsidiaries). Those indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries are AMREP Southwest Inc.
("ASW") and Kable Media Services,  Inc.  ("Kable").  James Wall is the principal
executive  officer  of ASW,  and  Michael P.  Duloc is the  principal  executive
officer of Kable. The registrant has no chief executive  officer.  Its executive
officers  include James Wall,  Senior Vice  President  and Peter M. Pizza,  Vice
President and Chief Financial  Officer,  and Michael P. Duloc, who may be deemed
an executive officer by reason of his position with Kable.
No. 10-11012.

#### Marmolejos *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof; I, John M. Scheurer, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ John M. ScheurerName:
    John M. ScheurerDate: August 10, 2009
§ 302-15.6 Under what circumstances may my agency authorize payment under this part? ( a ) For a relocation to an official station in the United States, your agency may authorize payment under this part when: ( 1 ) You are being returned from a foreign area post of duty to a different official station than the one from which you were transferred for your foreign tour of duty;
( 2 ) Your agency has determined that property management services is more advantageous and cost effective for the Government than having to sell your residence;
( 3 ) You have signed a service agreements; and
( 4 ) You meet any additional conditions that your agency has established.
( b ) For relocations to official stations outside the United States, your agency will authorize payment under this part when you meet conditions set forth in paragraphs (a)(3) and (4) of this section.
#### § 109-38.5104 Other motor equipment utilization standards.

No utilization standards are established for motor equipment other than motor vehicles. Each DOE office should establish through an agreement between the fleet manager and the OPMO utilization criteria for other motor equipment including heavy mobile equipment and review, adjust, and approve such criteria annually. Utilization of various classifications of other motor equipment can be measured through various statistics including miles, hours of use, number of trips, and fuel consumption. A utilization review of other motor equipment shall be performed at least annually by the motor equipment fleet manager to justify retainment or disposition of excess equipment not needed to fulfill Departmental, programmatic, health, safety, or security requirements.
### •"i-:ARTMENTO F

. ''iSPORWIO N '•-: rOPERATION S FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON,D.C . ^ H Mf ; I B P h U

O I N TH E MATTE RO F DARB Y AVIATION , INC . Civi l Penalt y Actio n FA A Docke t

No . CP08SO002 6 FA A Cas e No . 2008SO090020 DM S NO . FAA-2008-119

2 Befor e th e Decisionmake r WITHDRAWA L O F AGENCY' S APPEA L COME S NOW th e Agenc y (Appellant , an dherei n th e Agency ) an di n accordanc e wit h sectio n 13.23 3 o f

th e Rule s o f

Practic e i n FA A Civi l Penalty Action s (1 4 CF R §13.233 ) withdraw s it s appea l o f Administrativ e Law Judg e Isaa c D . Benkin' s Orde r serve d Jun e 3,2010 . Respectfull y submitted .

CYMON D VEATC H Attorne y Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Januar y 12,2011 .

### CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E

I hereb y certif

y tha t acopy of

thi s documen

t ha s bee n servedthi s dat

e b y e-mail and regula r mail to : Deann aL . Weidner , Esq . Anderso n & Weidner , LL

C 59 5 N . 20 * Street , Suit

e 145 0 Birmingham , A

L 3520 3 e-mail to : DLWeidner@davidbandersonlaw.com , DBAnderson@davidbandersonlaw.com , MDawson@davidbandersonlaw.com Hearin g Docke

t Federa l Aviation Administratio n 800 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D

C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke

t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Roo

m201 4 e-mail to : stephanie.mcdain@faa.go v andvicki.leemon@faa.go v

'RAYMOND VEATCH Attorne y

dat e
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC D/B/A 

KIKI ON THE RIVER AND ROMAN 

JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Juan Monsalve) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Juan Monsalve.

Dated this 28

th day of February 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 90 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/28/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 302-11.2 Am I eligible to receive an allowance for expenses incurred in connection with my residence transactions? ( a ) You must meet four basic conditions to be eligible to receive an allowance for expenses incurred in connection with your residence transactions: ( 1 ) You must be transferring from one official station to another;
( 2 ) Your relocation must be incidental to the transfer (*i.e.*, not for the convenience of the employee);
( 3 ) Your relocation must meet the distance test conditions of § 302-2.6; and
( 4 ) Your new official station must be within the United States.
( b ) If you previously transferred from an official station in the United States to a foreign area and you are now transferring back to the United States, then, in addition to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, you must have completed the time period specified in your service agreement for your overseas tour of duty.
[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18343, Apr. 1, 2011]
#### § 102-80.75 Who assesses environmental issues in Federal construction and lease construction projects?

Federal agencies must assess required environmental issues throughout planning and project development so that the environmental impacts of a project are considered during the decision making process.
#### § 102-74.580 Who decides when to replace a sidewalk?

Federal agencies, giving due consideration to State and local standards and specifications for sidewalks, decide when to install, repair or replace a sidewalk. However, Federal agencies may prescribe other standards and specifications for sidewalks whenever necessary to achieve architectural harmony and maintain facility security.
EXHIBIT 23
                  HENRY L. CREEL CO., INC.
                 Certified Public Accountant
                       (216) 491-0800
                     FAX (216) 491-0803





To Whom it May Concern:


The firm of Henry L. Creel Co., Inc., Certified Public
Accountants Consents to the inclusion of my report of
December 31, 2000, on the Financial Statements of Augrid of
Nevada, Inc. from the inception date of March 1, 1998
through December 31, 2000 in any filings that are necessary
now or in the future to be filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission.


Respectfully,


/s/ Henry L. Creel Co.
----------------------
Henry L. Creel Co., Inc., CPA

April 16, 2001
























         3587 LEE ROAD   SHAKER HEIGHTS, OHIO 44120
To meet customer

and partner needs for

high quality, accessible,

and reliable digital

weather, water and

climate services

Find Out More

Get More Information

http://weather.gov/ndfd

View Graphical Representations

of NDFD data:

http://weather.gov/forecasts/graphical

Access NDFD Digital Data:

http://weather.gov/ndfd/technical.htm

Find Verification and

Performance Assessments

http://weather.gov/ndfd/verification/

Questions, Comments?

nws.ndfd@noaa.gov

 Available?

 to provide

onal, high

 NWS and its

to create a wide

tes offer a variety

limate forecasts.

the following

ojections shown at

ed Universal Times:

8, 21.

Projections

s 

4 hours, out to 168 hour

s 

4 hours, out to 168 hour

2 hours, out to 168 hours

hours out to 72 hours; 

hours out to 168 hours

hours out to 72 hours; 

hours out to 168 hours

hours out to 72 hours; 

hours out to 168 hours

hours out to 72 hours;

hours out to 168 hours

hours out to 72 hours; 

hours out to 168 hours

hours out to 72 hours; 

hours out to 168 hours

s 

hours out to 72 hour

s 

hours out to 48 hour

2 hours out to 120 hours

12/04 NOAA PA ######
Anyone with Web access can

download Digital Services data.Teaming Digital Services with GISprovides powerful capabilities forcombining datasets and generatingnew products for changing needs.Digital Services offers the informationyou want, when you want it.Organizations can produce their ownproducts for print, broadcast or postingonline, or can tailor products to meetcustomer requirements.

Additional benefits are:

 More timely and consistent

weather information

 Data delivered in a variety of formats Higher temporal and spatial

resolution

 Support for weather enterprise Easier access to data Consistency between products

in all formats

Benefits of Digital Services

ormats

ilable?

RIB2)

p Language (XML)

mation Systems (GIS)

s

roducts

s
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-3257 Directorate ID: 2015-SW-072-AD

Helicopter Model: 

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 5 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The proposed actions are intended to detect delaminated engine mount bushings, which 

can lead to excessive vibration, cracking, failure of the engine mount front support pins, and loss 

of helicopter control.

Costs: We estimate that labor costs average $85 per work hour. Based on this estimate, we expect 

the following costs:

 Inspecting the bushings would require 1 work hour. No parts would be needed, for a 

total cost of $85 per helicopter and $425 for the U.S. fleet.

 Replacing a bushing would require 1 work hour and $373 for parts, for a total cost of 

$458 per bushing. 

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Matt Fuller
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                         815,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,295,142
<PP&E>                                       1,336,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                 486,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,998,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,761,447
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,238,875
<COMMON>                                        81,436
<OTHER-SE>                                  (5,083,738)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,998,020
<SALES>                                      3,494,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,586,272
<CGS>                                        2,620,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,667,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,145,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             393,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,621,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    42,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,674,902)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,674,902)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.46)
        

</TABLE>
§ 105-72.301 Standards for financial management systems. ( a ) Federal awarding agencies shall require recipients to relate financial data to performance data and develop unit cost information whenever practical.
( b ) Recipients' financial management systems shall provide for the following. ( 1 ) Accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federally-sponsored project or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in § 105-72.602. If a Federal awarding agency requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient that maintains its records on other than an accrual basis, the recipient shall not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. These recipients may develop such accrual data for its reports on the basis of an analysis of the documentation on hand.
( 2 ) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-sponsored activities. These records shall contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, outlays, income and interest.
( 3 ) Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property and other assets. Recipients shall adequately safeguard all such assets and assure they are used solely for authorized purposes.
( 4 ) Comparison of outlays with budget amounts for each award. Whenever appropriate, financial information should be related to performance and unit cost data.
( 5 ) Written procedures to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds to the recipient from the U.S. Treasury and the issuance or redemption of checks, warrants or payments by other means for program purposes by the recipient. To the extent that the provisions of the Cash Management Improvement Act (CMIA) (Pub. L. 101-453) govern, payment methods of State agencies, instrumentalities, and fiscal agents shall be consistent with CMIA Treasury-State Agreements or the CMIA default procedures codified at 31 CFR part 205, “Withdrawal of Cash from the Treasury for Advances under Federal Grant and Other Programs.”
( 6 ) Written procedures for determining the reasonableness, allocability and allowability of costs in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the award.
( 7 ) Accounting records including cost accounting records that are supported by source documentation.
( c ) Where the Federal Government guarantees or insures the repayment of money borrowed by the recipient, the Federal awarding agency, at its discretion, may require adequate bonding and insurance if the bonding and insurance requirements of the recipient are not deemed adequate to protect the interest of the Federal Government.
( d ) The Federal awarding agency may require adequate fidelity bond coverage where the recipient lacks sufficient coverage to protect the Federal Government's interest.
( e ) Where bonds are required in the situations described above, the bonds shall be obtained from companies holding certificates of authority as acceptable sureties, as prescribed in 31 CFR part 223, “Surety Companies Doing Business with the United States.”
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6659

LEONEL AYALA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-686-BO)

Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 4, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leonel Ayala, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Leonel Ayala, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying as untimely his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are

debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683

(4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ayala has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28421
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60655
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    611216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               719099
<PP&E>                                         191900
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 865535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          576800
<BONDS>                                         43996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          231
<OTHER-SE>                                     196111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   865535
<SALES>                                        599188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               605956
<CGS>                                          436094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  436094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               156069
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9946
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3738
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6208
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .26
        


</TABLE>
§ 105-71.133 Supplies. ( a ) *Title.* Title to supplies acquired under a grant or subgrant will vest, upon acquisition, in the grantee or subgrantee respectively.
( b ) *Disposition.* If there is a residual inventory of unused supplies exceeding $5,000 in total aggregate fair market value upon termination or completion of the award, and if the supplies are not needed for any other federally sponsored programs or projects, the grantee or subgrantee shall compensate the awarding agency for its share.
§ 301-10.190 When may I use a transit system as a means of transportation in conjunction with official travel? You may use a transit system as a means of transportation in conjunction with official travel when such transportation is authorized and approved by your agency in the following manner: ( a ) *At your official station.* ( 1 ) From your residence or other authorized point of departure, e.g., rail to airport;
( 2 ) To your residence or other authorized point of return, e.g., airport to rail;
( 3 ) From your residence to your office on the day you depart the official station on official TDY that requires at least one night's lodging; or
( 4 ) From your office to your residence on the day you return to the official station from an official TDY assignment that required at least one night's lodging.
( b ) *At your TDY location.* ( 1 ) From the TDY transit system station(s) to your place of lodging or place of official business and return;
( 2 ) To, from, and between your places of lodging and official business;
( 3 ) Between places of official business; or
( 4 ) To obtain meals at the nearest available place when the nature and location of the official business or the lodging at a TDY location are such that meals cannot be obtained there. You must attach a statement or include electronic remarks with your travel voucher explaining why such transportation was necessary.
[FTR Amdt. 2010-02, 75 FR 24435, May 5, 2010]