alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Andersen
Group, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended November 30,
1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       FEB-28-1995
<PERIOD-START>                          MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                       10,574          
<SECURITIES>                                  4,469
<RECEIVABLES>                                 5,463     
<ALLOWANCES>                                    510   
<INVENTORY>                                   6,057     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             26,195      
<PP&E>                                       18,224      
<DEPRECIATION>                                9,443     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               43,822      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         8,378     
<BONDS>                                       8,436     
<COMMON>                                      2,103
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        10,706      
<PREFERRED>                                       0 
<OTHER-SE>                                   10,589      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 43,822      
<SALES>                                      17,543      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             18,550      
<CGS>                                        11,508      
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                11,634      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                150   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              884   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,511)     
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (581)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (930)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  413    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               3,740      
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  2,780     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.44   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0  
        


</TABLE>
Order entered November 1 6 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 17 - 01310 - CV IN RE VENKY VENKATRA MAN, Rela t or Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District C ourt Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF04 - 11968 

### O RDER Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Myers, and Boatright Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs, if any, of this original proceeding
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### § 301-31.13 How long may my agency pay for subsistence expenses under this part?

Your agency may pay for subsistence expenses up to 60 days. However, your agency may pay for additional periods if it determines that an extension is justified.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 592 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 368
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 592

                          [Report No. 106-212]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 1999

                                Received

                July 13 (legislative day, July 12), 1999

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
                               Resources

                            November 2, 1999

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate a portion of Gateway National Recreation Area as ``World 
                  War Veterans Park at Miller Field''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PORTION OF GATEWAY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA 
              AS WORLD WAR VETERANS PARK AT MILLER FIELD.

    Section 3(b) of Public Law 92-592 (16 U.S.C. 460cc-2(b)) is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(b)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) The portion of the Staten Island Unit of the recreation area 
known as Miller Field is hereby designated as `World War Veterans Park 
at Miller Field'. Any reference to such Miller Field in any law, 
regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to `World War Veterans Park at 
Miller Field'.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 30, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 368

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 592

                          [Report No. 106-212]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate a portion of Gateway National Recreation Area as ``World 
                  War Veterans Park at Miller Field''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 2, 1999

                       Reported without amendment
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 122 (Friday, June 23, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 39107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15954]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD01-00-005]
RIN 2115-AA97


Safety Zone: Coast Guard Activities New York Annual Fireworks 
Displays

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a final rule published in the Federal 
Register of June 8, 2000, concerning regulations for annual fireworks 
displays located on Sandy Hook Bay, Rondout Creek, Hempstead Harbor, 
the Arthur Kill, and the Hudson River. That document contained an 
incorrect amendatory instruction.

DATES: The correction is effective June 23, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant M. Day, Waterways Oversight 
Branch, Coast Guard Activities New York (718) 354-4012.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In final rule FR Doc 00-14507, on page 36342, second column the 
amendatory instruction for item number 2 is incorrectly set out and a 
correction is needed.

PART 165--[CORRECTED]

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, in the publication on June 8, 2000, of the final rule 
[CGD01-00-005], which is the subject of FR Doc. 00-14507, make the 
following correction. On page 36342, second column, in amendatory 
instruction number 2, remove the word ``revised'' and add in its place 
the word ``add''.

    Dated: June 19, 2000.
Pamela M. Pelcovits,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, United States 
Coast Guard, DOT.
[FR Doc. 00-15954 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 784

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the payment of dependency and indemnity compensation to the surviving spouses of certain

former prisoners of war dying with a service-connected disability rated

totally disabling at the time of death.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself, Mr. STUMP, Mr. EVANS, Mr. SHOWS, and Mr.

FILNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the

payment of dependency and indemnity compensation to

the surviving spouses of certain former prisoners of war

dying with a service-connected disability rated totally

disabling at the time of death.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY COMPENSATION

4 FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES OF FORMER PRIS5 ONERS OF WAR.

6 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—Section 1318(b) of title 38,

7 United States Code, is amended—
2

•HR 784 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘that either—’’ in the matter

2 preceding paragraph (1) and inserting ‘‘rated totally

3 disabling if’’; and

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new

5 paragraph:

6 ‘‘(3) the veteran was a former prisoner of war

7 who died after September 30, 1999, and who had

8 been diagnosed as having one of the diseases speci9 fied in section 1112(b) of this title.’’.

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section is

11 further amended—

12 (1) in paragraph (1)—

13 (A) by inserting ‘‘the disability’’ after

14 ‘‘(1)’’; and

15 (B) by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘death;’’; and

16 (2) in paragraph (2)—

17 (A) by striking ‘‘if so rated for a lesser pe18 riod, was so rated continuously’’ and inserting

19 ‘‘the disability was continuously rated totally

20 disabling’’; and

21 (B) by striking the period at the end and

22 inserting ‘‘; and’’.

Æ
P150295.CEB

SAT (concerns) (03/03/2015):

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Analogs:

Migration to groundwater: negl to rapid

PBT rating: P3B?T1

Health: 1-2 Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0295

Page 2P150295.CEB

Page 3P150295.CEB

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0295

Page 5P150295.CEB

Page 6P150295.CEB

Page 7P150295.CEB

Page 8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING,
INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US $
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,346
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,109
<PP&E>                                           1,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,119
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,782
<SALES>                                         16,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,237
<CGS>                                            9,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    59
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,352
<INCOME-TAX>                                        57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 99: CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF
THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
 
     Written or oral statements made by Alcan or its representatives, including
statements set forth in Alcan's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
1997, which describe the Company's or management's objectives, projections,
estimates, expectations or predictions of the future may be "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will,"
"should," "estimates," "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations
thereon. The Company cautions that, by their nature, forward-looking statements
involve risk and uncertainty and that the Company's actual results could differ
materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements or
could affect the extent to which a particular projection is realized.
 
     Important factors which could cause the Company's actual performance to
differ materially from projections or expectations included in forward-looking
statements include global aluminum supply and demand conditions, aluminum ingot
prices and changes in other raw materials' costs and availability, cyclical
demand and pricing within the principal markets for the Company's products,
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting environmental,
health or safety compliance, economic developments and other factors within the
countries in which the Company operates or sells its products and other factors
relating to the Company's ongoing operations including, but not limited to,
litigation, labour negotiations and fiscal regimes.
 
     Copies of the Company's filings may be obtained by contacting the Company
or the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
#### § 109-43.101 Agency utilization reviews.

DOE offices and designated contractors are responsible for continuously surveying property under their control to assure maximum use, and shall promptly identify property that is excess to their needs and make it available for use elsewhere.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of M.P., K.G., and * From the 318th District

J.P., children, Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. FM 53,626.

No. 11-13-00142-CV * October 17, 2013

* Memorandum Opinion by McCall, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the order

of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10596

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

versus

DAVID ALONZO,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-180

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Alonzo, federal prisoner # 44847-177, seeks leave to proceed in 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 3, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10596 Document: 00513293333 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/03/2015
No. 15-10596

2

forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal of the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

motion to reduce his sentence based on retroactive amendment 782 to U.S.S.G. 

§ 2D1.1. By moving to proceed IFP, Alonzo is challenging the district court’s 

certification that his appeal was not taken in good faith because it is frivolous. 

See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

Under § 3582(c)(2), a sentence may be modified if it is based on a sentencing range that subsequently was lowered by the Sentencing Commission. 

The district court did not err in concluding that Alonzo’s range was not lowered 

by amendment 782.

Alonzo has failed to show that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on 

appeal. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly,

the motion to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See

Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-10596 Document: 00513293333 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/03/2015
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6644

JOHN MCCOMBS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (2:19-cv-01086-RBH)

Submitted: September 17, 2020 Decided: October 13, 2020

Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John McCombs, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John McCombs seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to 

amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

petitioner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, 

the petitioner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and 

that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McCombs has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 301-10.202 What is my liability for unauthorized use of a Government vehicle?

You are responsible for any additional cost resulting from unauthorized use of a Government vehicle and you may be subject to administrative and/or criminal liability for misuse of Government property.
#### § 102-73.325 What information must a covered entity provide to a Federal lessee?

Sections 3 and 4 of the Secure Federal LEASEs Act require that, before the Government may enter into a lease agreement or novation with an entity for high-security leased space (defined as Facility Security Level III, IV, or V), offerors must disclose whether the immediate owner, highest-level owner, or beneficial owner of the leased space, including an entity involved in the financing thereof, is a foreign person or entity, including the country associated with the ownership entity.
COURTM INUTES/ORDER

United StatesM agistrate Judge Patrick M .Hunt

Date: 12/09/22 Time:11:00a.m.

Defendant:DarrylGlennW iliams(J) J#: Case#: 22-6555-Hunt

AUSA:KarlaAlbite(AnitaWhit -Duty) Atorney: tfG (6.

Violation; ConspiracytoDistributeaControlledSubstance.

Proceeding'. lnitialAppearance CJA Appt:

Bond/PTDHeld:CYes (-No RecommendedBond: l 106 b V @'b

Bond etat: co-signedby: a. h

g 4:T )%

Surrenderand/ordonotobtainpassports/traveldocs Lan ge: English

ReporttoPTS+qdirp- pd/or x'saweek/monthby Disposition'.

phone: . ..x'saweek/monthinperson j( J (C r/le(-

Random urinetestingbyPretrialServices

Treatmentasdeemednecesary ;?:rcJ 6

Refrainfrom excessiveuseofalcohol

t3 '

r Participateinmentalhealthassessment& treatment

Maintainorseekful-timeemployment/education l l /f' w- -

NOcontactwithvidims/witnesses 00 4

6 I'S' '

Nofirearms

14. .

r ottoencum berproperty

M aynotvisittransportationestablishm ents

HomeConfinement/ElectronicMonitoringand/or

Curfew pm to am,paid by

Aelloigwioaunsces:Medicalneeds,courtapearances,ator//eyvisits, a , employment $ l#ued tof/l'M 39

Travelextendedto: SDFL vsw o p-gGsesçp .

Other:AppearataIIcourthearingandcomm itno new crimes.

1

NEXTCOURTAPPEARANEE oate: Time: Judge: Place:

ReportRECounsei:

PTD/BondHearing:

Prelim/AraignorRemoval: #<. J

StatusConference RE:

Ch The motionto continueto permitthe defendantto hirecounœlisGM NTED.Thetime from te aythroughtb

eckif

A ree eduleddateisexdudedfromthedeadlinefortrialascomputedundertheSpeedyTrialAd,sincetheendsofjuAc

pplicable: r

x rvedbygrantin thiscontinuanceoutweightheinteren ofledefendantandthepublicins trial.

D.A.R. l('- '

,D ll-: ))$ Timeincourt: ')/>.f&..ç.

Page:

Case 0:22-mj-06555-PMH Document 2 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-37.300 What information must a SASP provide GSA when reporting unneeded usable property for disposal? When reporting unneeded usable property that is not required for transfer to another SASP, provide GSA with the: ( a ) Best possible description of each line item of property, its current condition code, quantity, unit and total acquisition cost, State serial number, demilitarization code, and any special handling conditions;
( b ) Date you received each line item of property listed; and
( c ) Certification of reimbursement requested under § 102-37.315.
§ 105-68.885 May the debarring official extend a debarment? ( a ) Yes, the debarring official may extend a debarment for an additional period, if that official determines that an extension is necessary to protect the public interest.
( b ) However, the debarring official may not extend a debarment solely on the basis of the facts and circumstances upon which the initial debarment action was based.
( c ) If the debarring official decides that a debarment for an additional period is necessary, the debarring official must follow the applicable procedures in this subpart, and subpart F of this part, to extend the debarment.