alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-1226WM

_____________ Vincent L. Lomax, * * Appellant, * * Carol Lomax, * On Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Plaintiff, * Western District of Missouri. * v. * [Not to be Published] * City of Joplin, Missouri, * * Appellee. * *

___________ Submitted: October 3, 1997 Filed: October 27, 1997

___________ Bef ore RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, McMILLIAN, and BEAM, Circui t Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.We reject appellees & sugge stion that the notice of appeal is untimely. See Fed. 1 R. App. P. 4(c); Van Orman v. Purkett , 43 F.3d 1201, 1202 (8th Cir. 1994). The Hono rable Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., United States District Judge for th e 2 Western District of Missouri. -2- Vincent L omax appeals from the District Court & s adverse grant of summar y 1 2 judgment in h is 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Joplin, Missouri, an d others. Upon review of the record and the parties & submissions o n appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the District Court is correct. Accordi ngly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest:
CLE RK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT

.
#### § 102-74.485 Is there any limitation on the length of time of a permit?

Yes, a permit may not be issued for a period of time in excess of 30 calendar days, unless specifically approved by the Regional Officer (as defined in § 102-71.20 of this chapter). After the expiration of a permit, Federal agencies may issue a new permit upon submission of a new application. In such a case, applicants may incorporate by reference all required information filed with the prior application.
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0925**

**Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?**
# Comments on: 23-106: FLORES v. US [ORDER], Nonprecedential
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Western  Financial  Corporation
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Daniel
L.  Hodges,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court **of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 12, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00821

- CV

CITY OF CARRIZO SPRINGS and Adrian DeLeon, individually and as Mayor of the City of Carrizo Springs, Appellant s

v.

Isabel CUMPIAN , Bill Martin, Alfredo Z. Padilla, Individually and on behalf of the Carrizo Springs Housing Authority, Appellee s

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 09

- 12375

- DCV

- AJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On January 26, 2015, we suspended the deadlines in this appeal. Appellants have

notified the court that the parties have reached a preliminary agreement to settle and compromise the claims involved in the appeal. Appellants ask that the deadlines remain suspended for an additional twenty

- one days so the parties may obtain final approval of the agreement. We grant the motion. We order appellants file by March 3, 2015 , either a motion to dispose of the appeal or a status report.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 301-10.120 What must I do when different airlines furnish the same service at different fares?

When there is no contract City Pair Program fare and other carriers furnish the same service at different fares between the same points for the same type of accommodations, you must use the lowest cost service unless your agency determines that the use of higher cost service is more advantageous to the Government.

[FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55704, Sept. 12, 2022]
§ 102-75.655 What does the assignment recommendation contain? Any recommendation submitted by DOI must provide complete information concerning the plans for use of the property as a public park or recreation area, including— ( a ) Identification of the property;
( b ) The name of the applicant;
( c ) The specific use planned; and
( d ) The intended public benefit allowance.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-1176

___________ Bernard Gerstner, Jr.; Dale Sprague; * Ronald Cornelius, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Sebig, LLC; Arlo W. Erickson, in his * individual capacity only; Donald * [UNPUBLISHED] Roberts, in his individual capacity only; * B. A. Schawinsky, in his individual * capacity only; Pat Stewart, in her * individual capacity only, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 28, 2011 Filed: July 5, 2011

___________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bernard Gerstner, Dale Sprague, a nd Ronald Cornelius (collectively, appellants) previously appealed the dism issal of their civil complaint alleging securities violations. We affirmed the dismissal, except as to their claim based on the sale of unregistered securitie s under 15 U.S.C. § 77e(a). See Gerstner v. Sebig, LLC , 386 Fed. Appx. 573 (8th Cir. 2010) (unpublishe d per curiam). They now appeal thedistrict court’s 1 dismissal of the unregistered-securities claim as untimely. After careful review, we agree with the district court that the cl aim was not timely filed, and conclude that appellants were not entitled to equitable tolling. See 15 U.S.C. § 77 l (a)(1) (allowing private cause of action fo r violations of § 77e); 15 U.S.C. § 77m (providing limitations period for actions to enforce liability created under § 77 l (a)(1)); Firstcom, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. , 555 F.3d 669, 674-75 (8th Cir. 2009). We also conclude that the district court did notabuse its discretion in denying appellants’ motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist. , 440 F.3d 930, 933-34 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                        C.E.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(B) AND 15D-14(B)


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 26, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Michael A. Richardson
______________________________________
Michael A. Richardson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  April 12, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

EMILIO PINERO,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLAGLER 1164, LLC and CHONG’S

CHINESE RESTAURANT, INC. d/b/a

CHONG’S CHINESE RESTAURANT,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE

Plaintiff, EMILIO PINERO, and Defendant, FLAGLER 1164, LLC, by and through its

undersigned counsel, hereby notifies the Court that the Parties have reached a settlement in 

principle. The above Parties are in the process of memorializing their agreement and finalizing 

their settlement documents.

/s/ Glenn R. Goldstein

Glenn R. Goldstein

Florida Bar No. 55873

Glenn R. Goldstein & Assoc., PLLC

8101 Biscayne Boulevard, Ste. 504

Miami, FL 33138

Telephone (305) 900-2373

Email: GGoldstein@G21Legal.net

/s/ Lauren N. Wassenberg

Florida Bar No. 34083

Lauren N. Wassenberg & Assoc., P.A.

33 SE Fourth Street, Ste. 100

Boca Raton, FK 33432

Tel. 561-571-0646

Email: WassenbergL@gmail.com

/s/ Rodolfo Gomez

Rodolfo Gomez

Florida Bar No. 0820903

FordHarrison

One SE Third Avenue

Suite 2130

Miami, FL 33131

Telephone 305-8082100

Email: rgomez@fordharrison.com

Case 1:22-cv-23117-BB Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2022 Page 1 of 2
WSACTIVELLP:13657320.1

Case 1:22-cv-23117-BB Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2022 Page 2 of 2
Supplemental Information on Plaintiffs’ Maps 1 and 2 from Dr. Bryant Moy

June 9, 2023

Dr Moy analyzed the performance of the Black-preferred candidate in six recent contests from 

2022 (Senate, Governor, County Judge Group 5, Chief Financial Officer, Commissioner of 

Agriculture, and Attorney General), within the boundaries of the current District 5 and the 

Plaintiffs’ two proposed maps.

Next, he re-analyzed five contests from 2020 where he previously showed evidence of racial 

polarization, in his initial report. 

Black-Preferred Candidate Performance in 2022 Elections

Black-Preferred Candidate Performance in Previous RPV Elections

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmelo Velez, Appellant.

[628 NYS2d 158]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), imposed October 11, 1994, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of two to six years imprisonment.

*340Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree with the understanding that if he appeared for sentencing, a definite term of one year of imprisonment would be imposed. The defendant was advised, however, that if he failed to appear for sentencing, the court would not abide by its sentencing commitment, and would impose a longer term of imprisonment. The defendant failed to appear for sentencing, and when he was involuntarily returned to court two years later, he was sentenced to an enhanced term of two to six years imprisonment.

Although the defendant waived his right to appeal, the waiver was conditioned on the imposition of a definite sentence of one year. Because the sentence imposed was an enhanced term of two to six years of imprisonment, the waiver may not be enforced *(see, People v Patterson,*211 AD2d 829; *People v Prescott,*196 AD2d 599). Upon appellate review, however, we find that the sentence ultimately imposed was neither unduly harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Delgado,*80 NY2d 780). Furthermore, the defendant’s challenge to the imposition of the mandatory surcharge is premature *(see, People v West,*124 Misc 2d 622; *People v Burke,*204 AD2d 345; *People v Fields,*193 AD2d 814). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Balletta, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|               |  |                            
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:          |  |                            
|March 10, 2005 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|               |  |                            
|               |  | John P. Manning            
|               |  | Principal Executive Officer
|               |  |                            
|               |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Mark Szporka, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of PainCare Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 16, 2005



|/s/ Mark Szporka                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|Mark Szporka, Chief Financial &
Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

[Document Identifier: HCFA-10006]


Notice; Correction

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register issue of Tuesday, June 6, 2000, make 
the following correction:

Correction

    In the Federal Register issue of Tuesday, June 6, 2000, Volume 65: 
FR Doc. 00-14263, on page 35947, the fourth sentence of the first 
paragraph in column 1 (beginning ``Prior to that time'') should be 
deleted and replaced with the following sentence: ``Prior to that time, 
we must send a State Medicaid Directors letter soliciting applications 
and have sufficient time to review all applications adequately.''

    Dated: June 8, 2000.
Victoria Quigley,
Acting Manager, HCFA Office of Information Services, Security and 
Standards Group, Division of HCFA Enterprise Standards.
[FR Doc. 00-15799 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-M
PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED
                         AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION PLAN

        WHEREAS, Performance Technologies,  Incorporated (the "Company") adopted
the PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED STOCK OPTION PLAN (the "Plan") on May
1, 1986,  amended and restated the Plan effective  January 1, 1987,  amended the
Plan on May 3, 1990,  amended and restated  the Plan on April 18, 1994,  amended
the Plan on November  14,  1995,  amended and restated the Plan on June 5, 1996,
amended the Plan June 10, 1997 and amended the Plan again on June 3, 1998; and

        WHEREAS,  the Company desires to amend Section 3 of the Plan to increase
the number of shares of the Company's  Common Stock  reserved for issuance under
the Option Plan by 500,000 shares to 3,200,000.

        NOW,  THEREFORE,  Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its
entirety  effective  February  9, 2000,  subject to  approval  of the  Company's
stockholders, as follows:

3. Stock  Subject to  Options.  Subject to the  provisions  of Section 9 hereof,
options may be granted under the Plan to purchase,  in the  aggregate,  not more
than  3,200,000  Shares.  The  Shares  may,  in the  discretion  of the Board of
Directors of the Company,  consist  either in whole or in part of authorized but
unissued  Shares or shares held in the treasury of the  Company,  and the Shares
may, in the  discretion  of the  Committee,  become  subject to incentive  stock
options or non-statutory stock options.  Any Shares subject to an option,  which
for any reason  expires or is terminated  unexercised  as to such Shares,  shall
continue to be available for options under the Plan.

All other  terms  and  conditions  of the Plan  shall  remain in full  force and
effect.

        IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Company has caused this  Amendment  to Stock
Option Plan to be executed  this 9th day of February, 2000.


                         PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                             By:/s/Donald L. Turrell
                             -----------------------
                                Donald L. Turrell
                             Chief Executive Officer
Docket No. FAA-2012-0295
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, (the
Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the
Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, Penni F. Roll, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, that:



|    |                                                                                                                                          
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, as amended; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                                
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Registrant.



| |                             
| | ----------------------------
| | /s/ Penni F. Roll           
| |                             
| | Name:   Penni F. Roll       
| | Date:     August 6,
    2004
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Fiscalyear ... Farm Service Agency farm assistance program payments**
 
2010 | 2011| 2012
 
SuDoc Number:A 1.152:
Item Number:0010-B-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001064273
 
July 18, 2018
Exhibit 23.1




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our report dated August 22, 2001 (except for note G, as to which
date is September 28, 2001 and note B, as to which date is February 14, 2002),
accompanying the consolidated financial statements of The Credit Store Inc. and
subsidiaries included in the amended Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Credit
Store Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2001. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of The
Credit Store Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-42278, effective July 26, 2000).


/s/  GRANT THORNTON LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 5, 2001