alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special Committee 172 meeting to be held July 26-27, 2000, starting at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

The agenda will be as follows: July 26: (1) Plenary Convenes at 9:00 a.m.; (2) Introductory Remarks; (3) Review and Approve Agenda; (4) Working Group (WG)-2, VHF Data Radio Signal-in-Space Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards, review comments on final work (written inputs only) and vote on DO-224A (distributed in advance).

# Note:

 This is a single-purpose meeting convened solely for the purpose of completing the final draft of DO-224A. No comments will be accepted that were not submitted for review, in writing, prior to the meeting. July 27: (5) WG-2/Plenary as necessary; (6) Other Business; (7) Dates and Locations of Next Meeting; (8) Closing.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 14, 2000.

Jane P. Caldwell,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 00-15537  Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William K. Sessions, III, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JOSEPH JOHN GEORGE SCANIO, Defendant - Appellant. No. 11-10659 D.C. No. 2:06-cr-00434-MCE-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 17, 2012 ** San Francisco, California Before: BEA and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and SESSIONS, District Judge. *** After pleading guilty to possessing child pornography, Joseph Scanio was sentenced to a prison term and eight subsequent years of supervised release. The 

# FILED
OCT 22 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 conditions of release provided that, abse nt permission from his probation officer, Scanio could not associate with known fel ons or engage in contact with minors. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court held that Scanio had violated the terms of his release. Th e court revoked the release and sentenced Scanio to six months in prison, to be followed by eighty-seven months of supervised release. Scanio argues that the district court erred in finding that he had unauthorized contact with minors and associated with known felons. He also challenges the six month prison term. We affirm. 1. Scanio admittedly attended a party at a skating rink together with a number of children. Scanio chose to be in the close presence of these children, and therefore engaged in “contact” with them. See United States v. Musso , 643 F.3d 566, 571 (7th Cir. 2011); United States v. Johnson , 446 F.3d 272, 281 (2d Cir. 2006). His probation officer did not grant Scanio permission to a ttend this party. The officer’s failure to object to Scanio driving his daughter to skating practice was not blanket permission to attend all events involving children at the rink. 2. Scanio admitted that he repeated ly corresponded with persons he knew to be imprisoned felons. That corresponden ce constitutes forbidden association. United States v. King , 608 F.3d 1122, 1128 (9th Cir. 2010). 3. The district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking supervised release3 and imposing a six month prison term. The court expressly considered the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in imposing the sentence, which was in the middle of the applicable Guidelines range

. AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-145505,333-148075, 333-134383, 333-117945 and 333-108314 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No.333-145504 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 28, 2008 (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes explanatory paragraphs regarding going concern uncertainty, the change inaccounting for stock-based compensation upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting No.123(R), *Share-Based Payment,*effective January 1, 2006, and the adoption of Financial AccountingStandards Board Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — aninterpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,*effective January 1, 2007)relating to the balance sheets of VIA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, andthe related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each ofthe two years in the period ended December 31, 2007, and for the period from June 14, 2004 (date ofinception) to December 31, 2007 included in the Annual Report on From 10-K of VIA Pharmaceuticals,Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.        /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP     San Francisco, California   March 28, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                         8,992
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              30,293
<PP&E>                                         7,984
<DEPRECIATION>                                (5,588)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                32,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        315,479
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       2,661
<OTHER-SE>                                  (285,451)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  32,689
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   7
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              15,149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (15,142)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (15,142)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (15,142)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.01)


</TABLE>
§ 105-68.425 When do I check to see if a person is excluded or disqualified? As an agency official, you must check to see if a person is excluded or disqualified before you— ( a ) Enter into a primary tier covered transaction;
( b ) Approve a principal in a primary tier covered transaction;
( c ) Approve a lower tier participant if agency approval of the lower tier participant is required; or
( d ) Approve a principal in connection with a lower tier transaction if agency approval of the principal is required.
#### § 105-68.980 Participant.

*Participant* means any person who submits a proposal for or who enters into a covered transaction, including an agent or representative of a participant.
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 194   Entered on FLSD Docket 05/24/2024   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 194   Entered on FLSD Docket 05/24/2024   Page 2 of 2
§ 187.325 Duties and operation of office. ( a ) The office must retain the evidence used to establish the accuracy of the information in its files relating to the current ownership of a vessel and the information on the certificate of title.
( b ) The office must retain in its files all information regarding a security interest in a vessel for at least 10 years after the office receives a termination statement regarding the security interest. The information must be accessible by the hull identification number (HIN) for the vessel and any other methods provided by the office.
( c ) If a person submits a record to the office, or submits information that is accepted by the office, and requests an acknowledgment of the filing or submission, the office must send to the person an acknowledgment showing the HIN of the vessel to which the record or submission relates, the information in the filed record or submission, and the date and time the record was received or the submission accepted. A request under this section must contain the HIN and be delivered by means authorized by the office.
( d ) The office must send or otherwise make available in a record the following information to any person that requests it and pays the applicable fee: ( 1 ) Whether the files of the office indicate, as of a date and time specified by the office, but not a date earlier than 3 days before the office received the request, any certificate of title, security interest, termination statement, or title brand that relates to a vessel— ( i ) Identified by a HIN designated in the request;
( ii ) Identified by a vessel number designated in the request; or
( iii ) Owned by a person designated in the request.
( 2 ) With respect to the vessel— ( i ) The name and address of any owner as indicated in the files of the office or on the certificate of title;
( ii ) The name and address of any secured party as indicated in the files of the office or on the certificate, and the effective date of the information; and
( iii ) A copy of any termination statement indicated in the files of the office and the effective date of the termination statement.
( 3 ) With respect to the vessel, a copy of any certificate of origin, secured party transfer statement, transfer-by-law statement under § 187.320, and other evidence of previous or current transfers of ownership.
( e ) In responding to a request under this section, the office may provide the requested information in any medium. On request, the office must send the requested information in a record that is in keeping with State rules of evidence.
**Exhibit 10.27****THE ALLIED DEFENSE GROUP, INC.****MECAR CERTIFICATE**     The undersigned, being the duly elected Chief Executive Officer and President of The AlliedDefense Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “**Company**”), hereby represents, warrants andcertifies solely in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer and President (and not individually),to the Buyers pursuant to Paragraph 1(c) of the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 19,2007 (the “**Securities Purchase Agreement**”), by and among the Company and the investors identifiedon the Schedule of Buyers attached thereto, as follows (capitalized terms used but not otherwisedefined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement): 1. On July 11, 2007, Mecar S.A. (the “**Supplier**”) and Mecar LTD(E.C.) (the “**Buyer**”) signed and delivered that certain contract (the “**MECARContract**”), whereby the Buyer and the Seller have agreed on certain terms andconditions with respect to orders for the delivery of product for a minimumaggregate value of EUR 110,000,000, to be executed in two tranches, over atwo-year period as follows: (a) The first tranche of the MECAR Contract shallhave a value of not less than EUR 60,000,000.  (b) The orders under the MECAR Contract shall havefirm fixed price, and all currency risk shall be borne by the Supplier.  (c) For each tranche of the MECAR Contract, (i)the Buyer will provide a down payment of 15-20% against a Counter BankGuarantee provided by the Supplier, (ii) the Buyer will pay 70-75% ofthe contract price for each partial shipment and (iii) the remaining10% will be paid upon completion of the contract.  (d) In accordance with the MECAR Contract, theBuyer may inspect and accept/reject the supplied materials within threemonths from delivery.  (e) Under the MECAR Contract the maximum fine fordelay in delivery is 12% of the total value of the goods not delivered.  (f) The terms of the MECAR Contract provide thatcosts of transport, shipping, and insurance will be paid by theSupplier to the port of entry. 2. As of the date hereof, the MECAR Contract has been executed anddelivered on behalf of the Buyer and the Supplier and constitute the legal,valid and binding obligations of the Buyer and the Supplier enforceable againstthe Buyer and the Supplier in accordance with their respective terms, except assuch enforceability may be limited by general principles of equity or toapplicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, liquidation andother similar laws relating to, or affecting generally, the enforcement ofapplicable creditors’ rights and remedies.  3. On July 11, 2007, the Company issued a press release announcingthe execution and delivery of the MECAR Contract.[The remainder of the page is intentionally left blank]
 

 
     **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned has executed this certificate this 11th day of July, 2007.     John J. Marcello  Chief Executive Officer and President  The Allied Defense Group, Inc.  8000 Towers Crescent Drive, Suite 260  Vienna, VA 22182
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           228,802
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           22,809
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             22,892
<EQUITIES>                                       4,045
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 255,656
<CASH>                                          26,307
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             180,698
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 828,442
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                458,239
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            102,562
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 16,303
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           363
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   828,442
<PREMIUMS>                                     173,557
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             12,194
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  31,838
<BENEFITS>                                     114,093
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     33,716
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            78,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,202
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,398
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,398
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 261,700
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            123,986
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                3,023
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              56,088
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                55,875
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                458,239
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory P.
Chandler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Gregory P. ChandlerChief
      Financial OfficerApril
      14, 2010
UM TED STATESDISTRICT COURT

SOUTIIERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.22-81516-CV -M lDDLEBROOKS

m ADM IRALTY

IntheM atteroftheCom plaintforExoneration

From orLim itationofLiabilitybyTOW BOAT ONE,

m C.asOwnerofone199923-footalllminllm vessel,

HullIdentifkationN o.:5AM A10461-1999,Flodda

RegiskationNo.F1.92271.D

Petitioner.

/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT M D RECOM G O ATION O F M AGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on United States M agiskate Judge W illiam

Mathewman'sReportandRecommendationsCReport''),enteredApdl7,2023.(DE 58).n e

ReportrecommendsgantofPetitionerTowboatOne,Inc.'sCTBO'')MotiontoConsolidate(DE

30),fled on February 2023.On April12,2023,Petitioner Christopher McDermott

ttMcDermot1''lfiledobjectionstotheReport.(DE59).TBO respondedonApdl19,2023.(DE

60).

Ihaveconductedan independentdenovoreview oftheReportandtherecordasawhole.

Havingcarefulyconsideredthisreeord,thebdefmgontheParties'objections,andapplicablelaw,

Iar eewithJudgeM atthewm an'sfm dingsand conclusions,and I5nd thatthereœsoningin the

Reportisaccurateandthorough.

Accordingly,itisORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1.McDermott'sObjections(DE59)areOVERRULED.

2.MagiskateJudgeMatthewman'sReportandRecommendation(DE58)isO OPTED.

Case 9:22-cv-81516-DMM Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2023 Page 1 of 2
TB0'sMotiontoConsolidate(DE30)isGRANTED.

4. 'FheClerkofCourtSV IADM INISTRATIVELY CLOSE CaseNo.22-CV-81588and

DENY ASM OOT anypendingm otionsinthatm atter.

5. A11futureslingsshallbem adeunderCaseNo.22-CV -81516only.

SIGNED inChambersatW estPnlm Beach,Floridw this yof dl, 023.

D dM .M iddlebroo s

UitedStatesDisG ctJudge

CC* M agiskateJudgeW illiam M atthewm an

Collngelofrecord

Case 9:22-cv-81516-DMM Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2023 Page 2 of 2
NEWS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                                AMERICAN STANDARD

                        ANNOUNCES RETIREMENT OF DIRECTOR

         Piscataway,  NJ - October 29, 1999 - American  Standard  Companies Inc.
(NYSE:ASD) today announced that Mr. Joseph S. Schuchert has informed the Company
of his decision to retire now from his service on the Board of Directors. He has
been a Director for more than ten years since  leading the  Company's  leveraged
buy-out in 1988 and will  reach the age of 71 this  December.  With the  Board's
recent election of a new Chairman and Chief  Executive  Officer,  Mr.  Schuchert
decided it would be timely to leave the Board and expressed his confidence  that
the Company is well positioned to enter a new phase of its development.

AMERICAN STANDARD is a $7 billion global,  diversified  manufacturer of Trane(R)
and AMERICAN STANDARD(R) air conditioning products, AMERICAN STANDARD(R),  IDEAL
STANDARD(R),  STANDARD(R)  ,  PORCHER(R),  ARMITAGE  SHANKS(R)  AND  DOLOMITE(R)
plumbing products,  WABCO(R)  commercial and utility vehicle braking and control
systems,   COPALIS(R)  and  Pylori-Chek  (TM)  medical  diagnostic  systems  and
DiaSorin(TM) medical diagnostic products. The company operates 116 manufacturing
facilities in 33 countries and employs approximately 57,000 people worldwide.

For Further Information Contact:
Ray Pipes (732) 980-6095 or
Lisa Glover (732) 980-6048

THE  LATEST  NEWS   RELEASE   AND   CORPORATE   INFORMATION   CAN  BE  HEARD  ON
1-888-ASD-NEWS.  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON AMERICAN STANDARD IS AVAILABLE ON THE
COMPANY'S WORLDWIDE WEB SITE AT HTTP://WWW.AMERICANSTANDARD.COM
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2024

NO. 03-22-00059-CV

Levi Pate and Nicole Pate, Appellants

v.

Fun Town RV San Angelo, LP, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH;

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on December 28, 2021. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.