alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

West Palm Beach Division

BRITTANY ROBERSON, REBECCA 

FREEMAN, BIANCA VIÑAS, TIFFANY 

KING, and TRESHA THOMPSON, 

individually and on behalf of others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

HCI COLLEGE LLC (DBA HEALTH 

CAREER INSTITUTE LLC), FLORIAN 

EDUCATION INVESTORS LLC, and 

STEVEN W. HART,

Defendant(s).

Civil Action No. 9:22-CIV-81883-RAR

NOTICE OF FILING PROPOSED ORDER SCHEDULING MEDIATION

As required by the Court’s order of February 6, 2023, ECF No. 35, Plaintiffs, with 

Defendants’ consent, hereby file the attached proposed order scheduling mediation.

Dated: February 24, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Nicole Mayer

NICOLE MAYER

Florida Bar No. 012035

Nicole@MayerLawFlorida.com

171 Dommerich Drive.

Maitland, Florida 32751

(352) 494-3657

REBECCA EISENBREY

(pro hac vice)

reisenbrey@ppsl.org

ERIC SCHMIDT

(pro hac vice)

eschmidt@ppsl.org

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023 Page 1 of 2
Project on Predatory Student Lending

769 Centre Street, Suite 166

Jamaica Plain, MA 02130

(617) 390-2669

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

/s/ Michael J. Carney

MICHAEL J. CARNEY

Florida Bar No. 44326

MJC-KD@kubickidraper.com

BARBARA FOX

Florida Bar No. 155608

BF-KD@kubickidraper.com

KUBICKI DRAPER

110 East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1400

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301

(954) 713-2323

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023 Page 2 of 2
Air

- Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute American Council for an Energy

- Efficient Economy

March 2, 201 5

To: Members of the Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee
(ASRAC)

Re: Negotiated Rulemaking on C ommercial Packaged Air Conditioners and Commercial

Furnaces

Th e Air

- Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) and the American Council for an Energy

- Efficient Economy (ACEEE) are writing to respectfully request that the Appliance
Standar ds and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee (ASRAC) consider a negotiated rulemaking for commercial package air conditioners and commercial furnaces at its upcoming meeting on March 19, 2015.

As you may know, the Department of Energy (DOE) recently rele ased two notices of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) proposing minimum energy conservation standards for commercial package air conditioners and commercial furnaces. At the same time, manufacturers represented by AHRI and energy efficiency advocates including ACEEE, the Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Natural Resources Defense Council, Earthjustice, Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance, Alliance to Save Energy plus the California Investor Owned Utilities entered into discussions to exp lore the feasibility of a negotiated rulemaking. The group , including representatives of the manufacturers, met a first time on January 8, 2015 and a second time on February 5 th

. We invited representative s of the Air

- Conditioning Contractors of America (ACCA), the Heating Air

- Conditioning Distributors International (HARDI), and the Department of Energy (DOE) to attend this second meeting and they participated.

There was a consensus among those who attended the meetings that both rulemakings will
benefit from a negotiated process through ASRAC. There was a general belief that an ASRAC process will facilitate greater communicati on among stakeholders and very importantly, will provide the analytic support needed for a timely resolution of the rulemakings.

It is our hope that the ASRAC committee will look favorably at our request. Thank you for your
consideration.

Respectfully submitted

,

Karim Amrane
Senior Vice President

Air

- Conditioning Heating, and Refrigeration

I nstitute Steve n Nadel
Executive Director American Council for an Energy

- Efficient Economy
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 71

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the exclusion from

gross income for veterans’ benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. STUMP (for himself and Mr. EVANS) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

the exclusion from gross income for veterans’ benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF VETERANS’

4 BENEFITS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 134 of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain

7 military benefits) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—Gross income shall not

9 include—

10 ‘‘(1) any qualified military benefit, and
2

•HR 71 IH

1 ‘‘(2) any other benefit administered by the Sec2 retary of Veterans Affairs.’’

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

5 December 31, 1984.

Æ
#### § 102-2.50 How do I number my agency's implementing regulations?

The first three-digit number represents the chapter number assigned to your agency in Title 41 of the CFR. The part and section numbers correspond to FMR material. For example, if your agency is assigned Chapter 130 in Title 41 of the CFR and you are implementing § 102-2.60 of the FMR, your implementing section would be numbered § 130-2.60.
§ 109-38.104 Fuel efficient passenger automobiles and light trucks. ( a ) What size motor vehicles may we obtain? (See 41 CFR 102-34.50).
( b ) All requests to obtain passenger automobiles larger than class IA, IB, or II (small, subcompact, or compact) shall be forwarded with justification to the DPMO for approval and certification for compliance with the fuel economy objectives listed in 41 CFR 102-34 subpart B.
( c ) Requests to exempt certain light trucks from the fleet average fuel economy calculations shall be forwarded with justification to the Office of Management for approval.
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMREP  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned
does hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  December 10, 2008

  /s/ Peter M. Pizza
--------------------------
Peter M. Pizza*
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

  /s/ James Wall
--------------------------
James Wall*

  /s/ Michael P. Duloc
--------------------------
Michael P. Duloc*



--------------
*The  Registrant  is a  holding  company  which  does  substantially  all of its
business   through   two   indirect   wholly-owned   subsidiaries   (and   their
subsidiaries). Those indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries are AMREP Southwest Inc.
("ASW") and Kable Media Services,  Inc.  ("Kable").  James Wall is the principal
executive  officer  of ASW,  and  Michael P.  Duloc is the  principal  executive
officer of Kable. The Registrant has no chief executive  officer.  Its executive
officers  include James Wall,  Senior Vice  President  and Peter M. Pizza,  Vice
President and Chief Financial  Officer,  and Michael P. Duloc, who may be deemed
an executive officer by reason of his position with Kable.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No.: 9:22-cv-81427- Matthewman 

VIRGINIA JOHNSON, on behalf of 

herself and others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MEDIGAP LIFE, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

 ______ / 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL 

Pursuant to Local Rule 11.1(d)(3)(B), Nathan D. Chapman, of Kabat Chapman & Ozmer 

LLP, hereby moves to withdraw as counsel of record for Defendant Medigap Life, LLC 

(“Medigap” or “Defendant”). Medigap will continue to be represented in this matter by Ryan D. 

Watstein of Watstein Terepka LLP. Medigap has received notice of and consented to the filing of 

this motion to withdraw. 

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the undersigned respectfully requests that the 

Court grant leave to withdraw his Appearance in the above-captioned case. 

Dated: June 8, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

KABAT CHAPMAN & OZMER LLP 

/s/ Nathan D. Chapman 

Nathan D. Chapman 

Florida Bar No. 028873 

nchapman@kcozlaw.com 

171 17th Street NW, Suite 1550 

Atlanta, Georgia 30363 

Tel.: (404) 400-7300 

Fax: (404) 400-7333 

Counsel for Defendant Medigap Life, LLC

Case 9:22-cv-81427-WM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2023 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, on June 8, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to 

all counsel of record. 

/s/ Nathan D. Chapman 

Nathan D. Chapman

Case 9:22-cv-81427-WM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of North Shore
Capital IV, Inc., (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gerard Werner,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: October 17, 2005


/s/ Gerard Werner
Chief Executive Officer
October 17, 2005



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 10.29
  CONSOLIDATED
    EBITDA
        Six MonthsEndedMarch 31,2008Consolidated Net Loss

$
(4,847
)Any extraordinary or non recurring gains or lossesLoss from disposed operations, net of tax


1,300(Gain) Loss on sale of subsidiaries


387Non-cash charges that do not result in future cash obligationsLoss (Gain) from fair value of notes and warrants


1,210(Gain) Loss from Sale of Fixed Assets


217Non-cash expenses associated with stock compensation expense


376Adjusted Net Loss before

$
(1,357
)Interest Income


(504
)Interest Expense


3,442Income tax expense


151Depreciation Expense


2,888Amortization Expense


557Any non-cash transactionsForeign currency losses


218Adjustments related to Inventory


374Bad Debt Expense


42Hedge or non-hedge derivative adjustments


Consolidated EBITDA

$
5,811Other Financial Disclosure Required based on terms of
    notes:Consolidated Net Interest Expense

$
2,938Consolidated Net Debt (Total Debt less Cash and Cash
    Equivalents) at March 31, 2008

$
33,125Quotient of Consolidated Net Debt divided by 2 times of
    Consolidated EBITDA


2.85Covenant Requirement  not more than


5.00Covenant Status


PASSED
§ 105-57.001 Purpose, authority and scope. ( a ) This part provides standards and procedures for GSA to collect money from a debtor's disposable pay by means of administrative wage garnishment to satisfy delinquent non-tax debt owed to the United States.
( b ) These standards and procedures are authorized under the wage garnishment provisions of the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, codified at 31 U.S.C. 3720D, and Department of the Treasury Wage Garnishment Regulations at 31 CFR 285.11.
( c ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) This part applies to any GSA program that gives rise to a delinquent non-tax debt owed to the United States and that pursues recovery of such debt.
( 2 ) This part will apply notwithstanding any provision of State law.
( 3 ) Nothing in this part precludes the compromise of a debt or the suspension or termination of collection action in accordance with applicable law. See, for example, the Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS), 31 CFR parts 900 through 904.
( 4 ) The receipt of payments pursuant to this part does not preclude GSA from pursuing other debt collection remedies, including the offset of Federal payments to satisfy delinquent non-tax debt owed to the United States. GSA may pursue such debt collection remedies separately or in conjunction with administrative wage garnishment.
( 5 ) This part does not apply to the collection of delinquent non-tax debt owed to the United States from the wages of Federal employees from their Federal employment. Federal pay is subject to the Federal salary offset procedures set forth in 5 U.S.C. 5514 and other applicable laws. GSA standards and procedures for offsetting Federal wage payments are stated in 41 CFR part 105-56.
( 6 ) Nothing in this part requires GSA to duplicate notices or administrative proceedings required by contract or other laws or regulations.
§ 109-26.501-50 Authority and allocations for the acquisition of passenger motor vehicles. ( a ) Authority for the acquisition of passenger motor vehicles is contained in the Department's annual appropriation act.
( b ) DOE offices shall include in their budget submissions the number of passenger motor vehicles to be purchased during the fiscal year. The procurements will be identified as either additions to the motor vehicle fleet or replacement vehicles. A copy of the motor vehicle portion of the submission should be submitted to the Office of Management.
( c ) To ensure that DOE does not exceed the number of passenger motor vehicles authorized to be acquired in any fiscal year, the Office of Management or designee shall allocate to and inform the field organizations in writing of the number of passenger motor vehicles which may be acquired under each appropriation. These allocations and the statutory cost limitations imposed on these motor vehicles shall not be exceeded.
( d ) The motor vehicle fleet manager shall provide written certification to the OPMO that disposition action has been taken on replaced passenger motor vehicles. Such certification shall be provided no later than 30 days after the disposition of the vehicle. Replaced passenger motor vehicles shall not be retained in service after receipt of the replacement vehicle.
No. 10-11057.

#### Jarvis *v.*Maryland.

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Cer-tiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       9,150,979
<SECURITIES>                                84,007,816
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,229,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,080,798
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           149,271,630
<PP&E>                                       4,152,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             249,892,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      206,793,198
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       810,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               249,892,612
<SALES>                                     16,149,830
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,432,266
<CGS>                                        5,965,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,967,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,640,036
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                50,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,967,683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,692,922
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,967,683
<DISCONTINUED>                               7,627,825
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,692,922
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,934,903
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.09
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 44648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18852]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7533]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Nicaragua

    Pursuant to Section 7086(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. 
L. 111-117) as carried forward by the Full-Year Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub. L. 112-10) (``the Act''), and 
Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby 
determine that it is important to the national interest of the United 
States to waive the requirements of Section 7086(c)(1) of the Act with 
respect to Nicaragua and I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 12, 2011.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-18852 Filed 7-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```
#### § 128-50.102 Periodic reviews.

Each bureau shall be responsible for performing an independent accountability review at least once a year to ensure compliance with this subpart and with the bureau's procedures for the handling, storage, and disposal of its seized personal property. In particular, a bureau conducting a review shall verify that the inventory records are accurate, current, and are being kept in accordance with established inventory procedures.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5477

To provide that gaming shall not be allowed on certain Indian trust lands

in California that were purchased with certain Federal grant funds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 17, 2000

Mr. HUNTER (for himself, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, and Mr. FILNER) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To provide that gaming shall not be allowed on certain

Indian trust lands in California that were purchased

with certain Federal grant funds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GAMING NOT ALLOWED ON CERTAIN LANDS.

4 Class II and class III gaming (as those terms are de5 fined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act

6 (25 U.S.C. 2703)) shall not be allowed on any land that—

7 (1) is located within the exterior boundaries of

8 San Diego County, California;
2

•HR 5477 IH

1 (2) was taken into trust by the Department of

2 the Interior between January 1, 1986, and Decem3 ber 31, 1986; and

4 (3) was purchased, in whole or in part, using

5 amounts provided under the community development

6 block grant program under title I of the Housing

7 and Community Development Act of 1974.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Allis-Chalmers
Corporation. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



DATE: AUGUST 16, 2005                        BY:  /S/ MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                                                  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


DATE: AUGUST 16, 2005                        BY:  /S/ VICTOR M. PEREZ
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  VICTOR M. PEREZ
                                                  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 6, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-20724

USDC No. 4:04-CR-81-1

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 PlaintiffAppellee,

versus

EVARISTO BELTRAN RODRIGUEZ,

 DefendantAppellant.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

-------------------------------------------------------------

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Evaristo Beltran Rodriguez has filed a motion to

withdraw and briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Rodriguez has

filed a response. Our independent review of the briefs and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Albertson's, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended May 5, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Lawrence R. Johnston
and Felicia D. Thornton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.

June 8, 2005

/S/ Lawrence R. Johnston
-----------------------------------------
Lawrence R. Johnston
Chief Executive Officer

/S/ Felicia D. Thornton
-----------------------------------------
Felicia D. Thornton
Chief Financial Officer