alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 109-1.5203 Management of subcontractor-held personal property. Designated contractors shall require those subcontractors provided Government-owned personal property to establish and maintain a system for the management of such property. As a minimum, a subcontractor's personal property management system shall provide for the following: ( a ) Adequate records.
( b ) Controls over acquisitions.
( c ) Identification as Government-owned personal property.
( d ) Physical inventories.
( e ) Proper care, maintenance, and protection.
( f ) Controls over personal property requiring special handling (*i.e.,* nuclear-related, proliferation-sensitive, hazardous, or contaminated property).
( g ) Reporting, redistribution, and disposal of excess and surplus personal property.
( h ) Accounting for personal property that is lost, damaged, destroyed, stolen, abandoned, or worn out.
( i ) Periodic reports, including physical inventory results and total acquisition cost of Government property.
( j ) An internal surveillance program, including periodic reviews, to ensure that personal property is being managed in accordance with established procedures.
Exhibit 3(a)(iii)

                      AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                AMREP CORPORATION

     We, the undersigned officers of AMREP Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation,
do hereby file this Amended Certificate of Incorporation to reflect an amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation as set forth below:

     Paragraph (b) of Article SEVENTH of the Certificate of Incorporation  shall
be amended in its entirety to read as follows:

               (b) Newly created  directorships  resulting  from any increase in
          the  number of  directors  and  vacancies  on the  Board of  Directors
          occurring  otherwise than by removal may be filled by the  affirmative
          vote of a majority of the  remaining  directors  then in office,  even
          though  less  than a quorum of the  Board of  Directors,  or by a sole
          remaining  director,  or by the  shareholders.  A  vacancy  caused  by
          removal  of a  director  shall  be  filled  by the  shareholders.  Any
          director  elected in accordance  with the provisions of this Paragraph
          (b) shall hold office for the  remainder of the full term of the class
          of directors in which the new  directorship was created or the vacancy
          occurred and until such  director's  successor shall have been elected
          and qualified.  If the number of directors is changed, any increase or
          decrease  shall be  apportioned  among  the  classes  by the  Board of
          Directors  so as to maintain  the number of directors in each class as
          nearly  equal as  possible.  No  decrease  in the number of  directors
          constituting  the Board of  Directors  shall  shorten  the term of any
          incumbent director.

     The foregoing  amendment was adopted in accordance  with the procedures set
forth in Section 1077 of the Oklahoma General Corporation Act.


                                             AMREP CORPORATION

                                             By:    /s/  Peter M. Pizza
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Peter M. Pizza, Vice President

ATTEST:

   /s/  Joseph S. Moran
--------------------------
Joseph S. Moran, Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15998]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Advanced Technology Institute (``ATI''): 
National Shipbuilding Research Program (``NSRP'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 11, 2000, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Advanced Technology Institute has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in the project 
status of the National Shipbuilding Research Program (``NSRP''). The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the general area 
of planned activity of the NSRP is to establish collaborative research 
efforts of limited duration to manage and focus national shipbuilding 
research and development funding on technologies that will reduce the 
cost of warships to the Navy, and establish U.S. international 
shipbuilding competitiveness. NSRP also provides a collaborative forum 
to improve business and acquisition processes.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Advanced Technology Institute: 
National Shipbuilding Research Program intends to file additional 
written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 13, 1998, Advanced Technology Institute: National 
Shipbuilding Research Program filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
January 29, 1999 (64 FR 4708).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 5, 
2000. A notice has not yet been published in the Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-15998 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Susan J. Kelley,Director of Finance and Principal Accounting Officer of AML CommunicationsInc., (the “Company), certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of AML Communications, Inc.;

2.     Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: July 7, 2005                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ SUSAN J. KELLEY                                    |   |   | By: | Susan J. Kelley,  Formerly: Susan J. Fite |
| Director of Finance and   Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsReference energy-altitude descent guidance:  Simulator evaluationDescent guidance was developed to provide a pilot with information to ake a fuel-conservative descent and cross a designated geographical waypoint at a preselected altitude and airspeed. The guidance was designed to reduce fuel usage during the descent and reduce the mental work load associated with planning a fuel-conservative descent. A piloted simulation was conducted to evaluate the operational use of this guidance concept. The results of the simulation tests show that the use of the guidance reduced fuel consumption and mental work load during the descent. Use of the guidance also decreased the airspeed error, but had no effect on the altitude error when the designated waypoint was crossed. Physical work load increased with the use of the guidance, but remained well within acceptable levels. The pilots found the guidance easy to use as presented and reported that it would be useful in an operational environment.Document ID19850008559Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsAbbot, K. H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Knox, C. E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1985Subject CategoryAircraft InstrumentationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2383NASA-TP-2383L-15800Accession Number85N16868Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-45-33Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850008559.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Natoma

Manors

Bay

Heights

Golden Pines

North

Grove

Shorecrest

Bay Point

Miami International Airport

Morningside

Grapeland Heights

Little Havana Dodge Island

Shenandoah

Virginia Key

Auburndale

Liberty City

Silver Bluff

Wynwood

Little River

Downtown

The Roads

Allapattah

Little Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

C

O

C

O

N

U

T

G

R

O

V

E

pU

ep Er sa St edi

r et a wegdE

D

3

Alt. M

a

p

v.2

Districts

12345

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-29 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMREP  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period  ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned
does hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  September 9, 2009

  /s/ Peter M. Pizza
--------------------------
Peter M. Pizza*
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

  /s/ James Wall
--------------------------
James Wall*

  /s/ Michael P. Duloc
--------------------------
Michael P. Duloc*



--------------
*The  Registrant  is a  holding  company  which  does  substantially  all of its
business   through   two   indirect   wholly-owned   subsidiaries   (and   their
subsidiaries). Those indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries are AMREP Southwest Inc.
("ASW") and Kable Media Services,  Inc.  ("Kable").  James Wall is the principal
executive  officer  of ASW,  and  Michael P.  Duloc is the  principal  executive
officer of Kable. The Registrant has no chief executive  officer.  Its executive
officers  include James Wall,  Senior Vice  President  and Peter M. Pizza,  Vice
President and Chief Financial  Officer,  and Michael P. Duloc, who may be deemed
an executive officer by reason of his position with Kable.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131945 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131945 

 COA: 270710 

Shiawassee CC: 99-002999-FC 

JOHN RONALD ESPIE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
**
**EXHIBIT 33.2**

**Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**

 
1.
Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100 - Asset Backed Securities, 17C.F.R. §§229.1100-229.l123 (“Regulation AB”), Exela Technologies, Inc. for itself and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and collectively “Exela”), isresponsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers who are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and who have requested confirmationof Exela’s compliance in connection with loan and/ or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”). Remittance processing is a service whereby check payments that areremitted by mail to a post office box are collected, processed through a highly automated data capture system, and prepared for deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary of the payment. 

 
2.
The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used in Exela’s assessment ofcompliance. Exela has concluded that the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the Platform (such criteria the“Applicable Servicing Criteria”). Exela has concluded that the remainder of the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform because Exeladoes not participate in the servicing activities referenced by such servicing criteria. 

 
3.
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, Exela has complied in all material respects with theApplicable Servicing Criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB. 

 
4.
Plante & Moran, PLLC, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report onExela’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. A copy of that attestation report is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

 

/s/ Thomas K. Dolan

Thomas K. Dolan
VP Information Security and Risk
February 14, 2019 
**
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification

I, Kerri S. Bernstein,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the American Express Credit Account Master Trust (the Exchange Act periodic
reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing or other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and Exela Technologies, Inc.

Date: March 25, 2020



|       |  |                                                           
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Kerri S. Bernstein                                    
|Name:  |  | Kerri S. Bernstein                                        
|Title: |  | President,                                                
|       |  | American Express Receivables Financing Corporation III LLC
|       |  | (Senior officer in charge of securitization)
#### § 105-8.150-3 Time period for compliance.

The agency shall comply with the obligations established under § 105-8.150 by May 7, 1991; except where structural changes in facilities are undertaken, such changes shall be made by March 8, 1994, but in any event as expeditiously as possible.
#### § 301-52.19 Will I receive a late payment fee if my agency fails to reimburse me within 30 calendar days after I submit a proper travel claim?

Yes, your agency must pay you a late payment fee, in addition to the amount due you, for any proper travel claim not reimbursed within 30 calendar days of your submission of it to the approving official.

[FTR Amdt. 90, 65 FR 3056, Jan. 19, 2000]
12

13

2

0

14

18

15

19

16

17

10

11

7

8

9

6

A

r

e

a

s

M

o

v

e

d

b

e

t

w

e

e

n

E

n

j

oin

e

d

Pla

n

a

n

d

R

e

s. 2

3

-

2

7

1

r Dr e iv R thr o N

NW

869 y wHet at S

869 y wHet at S

Biscayne Blvd Blvd ne ay sc Bi

State Hwy 90

N Miami Ave S Miami Ave

NW 2nd Ave

r eT ht 11 WN

t Sr le gal F W t Sr el gal F W

SW 2nd Ave

NW 3rd Ave

NW 4th Ave

SW 3rd Ave

NW 6th Ave

NW 5th Ave

NE 2nd Ave

NW 1st Ave

NW 1st Ave

SW 4th Ave

SW 5th Ave

E F al g el r St

SW 6th Ave

SE 2nd Ave

SW 1st Ave

t S ht 21 WN

t S ht 11 WN

t S ht 01 WN

SE 3rd Ave

14 y wH SU

NE 1st Ave

t S dn2 WN

NE 11th St

NE 11th St

NE 10th St

t S dn2 WS t S dn2 WS

NW 3rd Ct

t S dr 3 WN

t S ht 9 WN

t S ht 6 WN

t S ht 4 WN

t S ht 8 WN

t S dr 3 WS t S dr 3 WS

NE 2nd St

t St s1 WN t St s1 WN

t S ht 6 WS

t S ht 5 WS

t S ht 4 WS

t S ht 7 WS

1 y wH SU

t St s1 WS t St s1 WS

NE 3rd St

NE 8th St

NE 4th St

SE 3rd St

NE 9th St

NE 5th St

NE 7th St

NE 6th St

NE 1st St

SE 5th St

SE 4th St

8th St SE

SE 1st S

5

t

93-I 593 -I

59-I

95 I17

19

2

0

12

11

D

o

w

nto

w

n

Inset

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 173-22 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 NEWS RELEASE 

February 1, 2017 

NAVIGATOR HOLDINGS LTD. COMPLETES PLACEMENT OF
SENIOR UNSECURED BOND ISSUE 
 Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NVGS)
(‘Navigator’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce that it has successfully issued USD 100 million aggregate principal amount of new senior unsecured bonds in the Nordic bond market. The new bonds will mature in February
2021 and have a fixed coupon of 7.75% per annum. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and settlement is expected to occur on February 10, 2017. The net proceeds, together with available cash of the Company, will be used
towards repaying all of the outstanding principal amount of the Company’s USD 125 million senior unsecured bond issue with ISIN NO 001 0665508 (‘NAVIG01’). Navigator will exercise the call option in NAVIG01 to redeem NAVIG01 in
full at 102.00% of par value plus accrued interest. 
 The bonds have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act or any
state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or unless pursuant to an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and any other applicable securities laws. This
press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy the bonds, nor shall it constitute an offer, solicitation or sale in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful. 

For further information, please contact: 

David Butters (CEO, Navigator Gas), Tel: +1 212 355 5893 

Niall Nolan (CFO, Navigator Gas), Tel: +44 20 7340 4850
### 0 0 l..f) '()
No. 10-10906.

#### Warren *v.*Finnan.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### § 105-68.320 Must I verify that principals of my covered transactions are eligible to participate?

Yes, you as a participant are responsible for determining whether any of your principals of your covered transactions is excluded or disqualified from participating in the transaction. You may decide the method and frequency by which you do so. You may, but you are not required to, check the *EPLS.*