alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 797

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to exempt disabled individuals

from being required to enroll with a managed care entity under the

Medicaid Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to exempt

disabled individuals from being required to enroll with

a managed care entity under the Medicaid Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS FROM

4 REQUIRED ENROLLMENT WITH A MANAGED

5 CARE ENTITY UNDER THE MEDICAID PRO6 GRAM.

7 (a) AMENDMENT TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.—

8 Section 1932(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
2

•HR 797 IH

1 1396u–2(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the fol2 lowing:

3 ‘‘(D) EXEMPTION OF DISABLED INDIVID4 UALS.—A State may not require under para5 graph (1) the enrollment in a managed care en6 tity of an individual who is disabled (as deter7 mined under section 1614(a)(3)).’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 subsection (a) applies on and after the date of the enact10 ment of this Act. In the case of individuals described in

11 section 1932(a)(2)(D) of the Social Security Act (as added

12 by subsection (a)) who are enrolled in a managed care en13 tity pursuant to section 1932(a)(1)(A)(i) of such Act as

14 of such date, such individuals may disenroll from such en15 tity on and after such date.

Æ
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 758

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 5, 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

AN ACT

For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 758 RFS

1 SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO WIDOW’S INSURANCE BENE2 FITS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of determining the

4 eligibility of Nancy B. Wilson, the wife of Alphonse M.

5 Wilson (Social Security No. 271–18–9548), to widow’s in6 surance benefits under section 202(e) of the Social Secu7 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 402(e)), Nancy B. Wilson shall be

8 deemed to have been married to Alphonse M. Wilson for

9 a period of not less than 9 months immediately prior to

10 the day on which Alphonse M. Wilson died.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) takes effect

12 on March 21, 1991.

13 (c) PAYMENT.—Any benefits to which Nancy B. Wil14 son is entitled for the period prior to the date of the enact15 ment of this Act shall be paid to her in a lump sum.

Passed the House of Representatives April 4, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1030
JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS; BOARD OF CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS; NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD; SECRETARY OF THE NAVY; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, LoanProcessing Section, Roanoke, Virginia; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Loan Guaranty Division; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF CLEVELAND, OHIO; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, WASHINGTON, DC; SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-95-743) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 John Rodgers Burnley, App ellant Pro Se. Roger William Frydrychowksi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burnley v. United States , No. CA-95-743 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 109-43.307 Items requiring special handling.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

                      Pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the "Company"), herebycertifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: 9 August 2005                                                     

 

                                                                                         /s/ MichaelHanley                           

                                                                                         Michael Hanley

Executive VicePresident and 

InterimChief FinancialOfficer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No.'s 333-52704, 333-52716, 333-59795 and 333-29745) and Form S-3
(No.'s 333-87103, 333-68197, 333-52971 and 333-47777) of Daou Systems, Inc.,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Daou
Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Diego, California
March 29, 2002
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
 Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a list of information collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (301) 443-7978. Phase I of the National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program (0930-0171—Extension, revision)—The core and comparison studies of the evaluation collect information on child and family demographics, child mental health status, and service system development. In the core study, data were collected from children and families at intake into services, 6 months later, and every 12 months thereafter while the children remain in services. In the comparison study component, information is collected at intake, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and annually thereafter. In both studies, data were collected annually from grantees' administrators and providers. SAMHSA's Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) is seeking OMB approval for a 4-month extension of approval for the comparison study of this evaluation of integrated child mental health service systems funded by CMHS to allow sufficient follow-up data to be collected. The comparison study of the evaluation collects information on child and family demographics, and child mental health status and social functioning. The table below summarizes burden for this extension. 
                    ( print page 38294) Respondent
Average number of respondents
Average number of responses
Average hours per response
Total burdenCurrently approved



1493Caregivers
400
.94
1.20
451Youth
240
1.11
1.04
277Administrators/providers
75
2.69
0.25
50Total
715


778
 Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to: Allison Eydt, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, D.C. 20503. Dated: June 13, 2000. Richard Kopanda, Executive Officer, SAMHSA.


[FR Doc. 00-15460 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
#### § 101-30.101 Definitions.

As used in this part 101-30, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth in this § 101-30.101.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-24029-BLOOM

JOB DORRIELAN, 

Petitioner,

v.

ICE, et. al., 

Respondent.

/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Petitioner Job Dorrielan’s Motion to Reopen 

Case, ECF No. [24], docketed on February 2, 2023. Petitioner requests that the Court consider 

reopening the above-styled action, which was stayed pending Petitioner’s removal from the United 

States. ECF Nos. [11], [21]. For the following reasons, the Motion is denied as moot and the 

Petition is dismissed without prejudice.

As indicated in Respondent’s Response, see ECF No. [10] at 3, Petitioner has not yet been 

in immigration custody for 180 days. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that six months is the limit 

to a presumptively reasonable period of detention following a final order of removal pursuant to 

the Immigration and Nationality Act. 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(6); Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701

(2001). The record indicates that Petitioner has been in the custody of ICE since September 7, 

2022, ECF No. [10-1] ¶ 7, and that Petitioner filed the instant Petition on December 12, 2022, ECF 

No. [1]. Because Petitioner filed the Petition less than three and a half months since the time he 

was taken into custody, Petitioner’s Motion is premature and therefore due to be dismissed without 

prejudice at this time. See Gardiner v. Barr, No. 1:20-CV-20660, 2020 WL 1033398, at *2 (S.D. 

Case 1:22-cv-24029-BB Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/08/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-24029-BLOOM

2

Fla. Mar. 2, 2020) (dismissing Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

2241 where petitioner filed Petition approximately four and a half months after he was taken into 

custody).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Petitioner’s Motion to Reopen Case, ECF No. [24], is DENIED AS MOOT;

2. The above-styled case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

3. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, all pending motions are DENIED AS 

MOOT and all deadlines are TERMINATED;

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on February 7, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Job Dorrielan 

A#077-877-569 

Krome Service Processing Center 

Inmate Mail/Parcels 

18201 SW 12th Street 

Miami, FL 33194 

PRO SE

Case 1:22-cv-24029-BB Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/08/2023 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Allied Defense Group, Inc.
(formerly Allied Research Corporation) ("Allied") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the undersigned, John G. Meyer, Jr., as
Chief Executive Officer and Charles A. Hasper as Chief Financial Officer of
Allied, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
          operations of Allied.


/s/ Charles A. Hasper                      /s/ John G. Meyer, Jr.
-------------------------------------      -------------------------------------
Charles A. Hasper                          John G. Meyer, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer      Chief Executive Officer and President
November 13, 2003                          November 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Allied Defense Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Allied
Defense Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
§ 105-68.310 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes a person with whom I am already doing business in a covered transaction? ( a ) You as a participant may continue covered transactions with an excluded person if the transactions were in existence when the agency excluded the person. However, you are not required to continue the transactions, and you may consider termination. You should make a decision about whether to terminate and the type of termination action, if any, only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper and appropriate.
( b ) You may not renew or extend covered transactions (other than no-cost time extensions) with any excluded person, unless the General Services Administration grants an exception under § 105-68.120.
Case 1:22-cv-22871-JEM   Document 13   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/19/2022   Page 1 of 1
#### § 109-40.5101 Policy.

Upon request of a carrier, an appropriate certification will be issued by an authorized representative of the DOE to the carrier regarding the applicability of Price-Anderson indemnity to a particular shipment. Copies of such certifications, if performed by a Field Manager or a DOE cost-type contractor, shall be provided to the HQ DOE Manager, Transportation Operations and Traffic.
§ 105-60.400 Applying FOIA exemptions. ( a ) 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1)-(9) of the Freedom of Information Act provides that the disclosure requirements of FOIA do not apply to matters that are: ( 1 ) Specifically authorized under the criteria established by an executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and are in fact properly classified pursuant to such executive order (see Executive Order No. 13,526);
( 2 ) Related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency;
( 3 ) Specifically exempted from disclosure by statute other than 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1)-(9), provided that such statute: ( i ) Requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue;
( ii ) Establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld;
( 4 ) Trade secrets and commercial or financial information that could harm the competitive posture or business interests of a company;
( 5 ) Interagency or intra-agency memorandums or letters that would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency, provided that the deliberative process privilege shall not apply to records created 25 years or more before the date on which the records were requested;
( 6 ) Personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
( 7 ) Records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information: ( i ) Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings;
( ii ) Would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication;
( iii ) Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
( iv ) Reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution that furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source;
( v ) Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law; or
( vi ) Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual;
( 8 ) Contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or
( 9 ) Geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.
( b ) GSA will provide any reasonably segregable portion of a record to a requester after redacting the portions of the requested records that are exempt under this section.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                          AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying  Quarterly Report of AMREP  Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2002 (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned does hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


                                              /s/ Peter M. Pizza
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Peter M. Pizza
                                              Title:  Chief Financial Officer

                                              /s/ Michael P. Duloc
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Michael P. Duloc
                                              Title:  *

                                              /s/ James Wall
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              James Wall
                                              Title:  *

________________________
* The Company is a holding company which does  substantially all of its business
through  two  wholly-owned   subsidiaries   (and  their   subsidiaries).   Those
wholly-owned  subsidiaries  are AMREP  Southwest  Inc.  ("ASW")  and Kable  News
Company, Inc. ("Kable"). Mr. Wall is the principal executive officer of ASW, and
Mr. Duloc is the principal  executive officer of Kable. The Company has no chief
executive  officer and its only  executive  officers are James Wall and Peter M.
Pizza.  Mr. Wall is a Vice  President  of the  Company  and Mr.  Pizza is a Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 777 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 777

To amend the Job Training Partnership Act and the Workforce Investment 
  Act of 1998 to require that a minimum percentage of participants in 
   summer youth employment programs carried out under those Acts are 
                students who have high attendance rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1999

  Mr. Fattah (for himself, Mr. Sandlin, and Mr. Vento) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Job Training Partnership Act and the Workforce Investment 
  Act of 1998 to require that a minimum percentage of participants in 
   summer youth employment programs carried out under those Acts are 
                students who have high attendance rates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT THAT MINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF PARTICIPANTS IN 
              SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS UNDER THE JOB TRAINING 
              PARTNERSHIP ACT AND THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT OF 1998 
              ARE STUDENTS WITH HIGH ATTENDANCE RATES.

    (a) Amendments to Job Training Partnership Act.--
            (1) In general.--Section 254 of the Job Training 
        Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. 1633) is amended by adding at the 
        end the following:
    ``(e) Requirement That Minimum Percentage of Participants Are 
Students With High Attendance Rates.--Not less than 90 percent of the 
participants in the program under this part in each service delivery 
area shall be individuals who are students and who have a 90 percent or 
higher school attendance rate, as determined by the applicable 
school.''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 254 of the Job Training 
        Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. 1633), as amended by paragraph (1), 
        is further amended by redesignating the second subsection (c) 
        (as added by section 1016(a)(2)(C) of the Goals 2000: Educate 
        America Act) as subsection (d).
    (b) Amendment to Workforce Investment Act of 1998.--Section 129(c) 
of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
            ``(9) Requirement that minimum percentage of participants 
        in summer employment programs are students with high attendance 
        rates.--Not less than 90 percent of the participants in a 
        summer employment program carried out under this chapter in 
        each local area shall be individuals who are students and who 
        have a 90 percent or higher school attendance rate, as 
        determined by the applicable school.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 302-11.102 How will the Government determine who holds title to my property? The Government will determine who holds title to your property based on: ( a ) Whose name(s) actually appears on your title document (e.g., the deed); or
( b ) Who holds equitable title interest in your property as specified in § 302-11.105.