alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3045.15 Dollar amount limitation. ( a ) The Consumer Price Index used for calculations under this part is the CPI-U index, as specified in § 3030.141(a) of this chapter.
( b ) An experimental product may only be tested if total revenues that are anticipated or received by the Postal Service do not exceed $10 Million in any fiscal year, as adjusted for the change in the CPI-U index, as specified in paragraph (d) of this section ($10 Million Adjusted Limitation). Total revenues anticipated or received may exceed the $10 Million Adjusted Limitation in any fiscal year if an exemption is granted pursuant to § 3045.16.
( c ) For each fiscal year, the $10 Million Adjusted Limitation shall reflect the average CPI result during the previous fiscal year calculated as described in paragraph (d) of this section. The Commission shall publish this figure annually, after the close of the fiscal year, on its website at *http://www.prc.gov .*
( d ) The calculation of the $10 Million Adjusted Limitation involves the following steps. First, a simple average CPI-U index was calculated for fiscal year 2008 by summing the monthly CPI-U values from October 2007 through September 2008 and dividing the sum by 12 (Base Average). The resulting Base Average is 214.463. Then, a second simple average CPI-U index is similarly calculated for each subsequent fiscal year by summing the 12 monthly CPI-U values for the previous fiscal year and dividing the sum by 12 (Recent Average). Finally, the annual limitation for the current fiscal year is calculated by multiplying $10,000,000 by the Recent Average divided by 214.463. The result is expressed as a number, rounded to the nearest dollar.
( e ) The formula for calculating the $10 Million Adjusted Limitation is as follows: $10 Million Adjusted Limitation = $10,000,000 * (Recent Average/214.463).
[79 FR 54563, Sept. 11, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 975, Feb. 1, 2019; 85 FR 9659, 9660, Feb. 19, 2020; 85 FR 81139, Dec. 15, 2020]
§ 102-72.67 What work is covered under an ancillary repair and alteration delegation? ( a ) For purposes of this delegation, ancillary repair and alteration projects are those— ( 1 ) Where an Executive agency has placed an order from a vendor under a GSA Multiple Award Schedule and ancillary repair and alteration services also are available from that same vendor as a Special Item Number (SIN);
( 2 ) Where the ancillary repair and alteration work to be performed is associated solely with the repair, alteration, delivery, or installation of products or services also purchased under the same GSA Multiple Award Schedule;
( 3 ) That are routine and non-complex in nature, such as routine painting or carpeting, simple hanging of drywall, basic electrical or plumbing work, landscaping, and similar non-complex services; and
( 4 ) That are necessary to be performed to use, execute or implement successfully the products or services purchased from the GSA Multiple Award Schedule.
( b ) Ancillary repair and alteration projects do not include— ( 1 ) Major or new construction of buildings, roads, parking lots, and other facilities;
( 2 ) Complex repair and alteration of entire facilities or significant portions of facilities; or
( 3 ) Architectural and engineering services procured pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 1101-1104.
[74 FR 12273, Mar. 24, 2009]
#### Kalaher’s Administrator v. Independent Life Insurance Company.

(Decided November 21, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Second .Division).

Appeal and Error — Instructions.—Where no objection was made nor exception taken to the actio.n of the trial court in giving instructions, their propriety cannot be -considered on appeal.

FURLONG, WOODBURY & FURLONG for appellant.

HUMPHREY, MIDDLETON & HUMPHREY for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

On the 21st day of July, 1909, appellee issued a policy upon the life of Edward McMahon for $2,000.00 in which Mrs. Kate Kalaher, an aunt of the insured, was named as beneficiary. McMahon died on October 13th, 1909, and the company having refused to pay the policy upon receipt of proof of his death, Mrs. Kalaher instituted this action against the company to recover the amount of the policy. The company resisted payment upon the ground that McMahon had fraudulently procured the issuance of the policy by mating false statements in his application upon which the policy was issued as to the condition of his health and of his family history, and that he had not in fact been examined by the company’s physician, but that some other person: had béen substituted at the examination; that at the. time of the examination and issuance of the policy Me-' Mahon was not in good health as represented, but was suffering from tuberculosis of the lungs -in an advanced, stage. Mrs. Kalaher died during the pendency of the action, and it was revived in the name of her administrator. The trial by a jury resulted in a verdict for ap-" pellee and appellant’s petition -was dismissed.

*290The only ground presented for a reversal is that two of the instructions given by the court are erroneous. Prom a careful consideration of the entire record we are of the opinion that the pleadings and the evidence authorized the giving of both of these instructions, and that there was no error prejudicial to appellant’s substantial right in either, but it is not necessary for us to give our reason for so holding because of the fact that it does not appear in the record that appellant either objected or excepted to any of the instructions given, and we are therefore not authorized to review the action of the trial court upon the only question of which complaint is made.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
§ 301-11.1 When am I eligible for an allowance (per diem or actual expense)? When: ( a ) You perform official travel away from your official station, or other areas defined by your agency;
( b ) You incur per diem expenses while performing official travel; and
( c ) You are in a travel status for more than 12 hours.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 78

To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study and submit a

report to the Congress on methods for identifying and treating children

with dyslexia in kindergarten through 3rd grade.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study

and submit a report to the Congress on methods for

identifying and treating children with dyslexia in kindergarten through 3rd grade.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Early Detection of

5 Dyslexia in Children Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 78 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT BY SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

2 ON IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT OF

3 CHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA IN KINDER4 GARTEN THROUGH 3RD GRADE.

5 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Education, in con6 sultation with the National Academy of Sciences, shall

7 conduct a study on methods for identifying and treating

8 children with dyslexia in kindergarten through 3rd grade.

9 In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall consider—

10 (1) whether there is a biological basis for dys11 lexia;

12 (2) whether dyslexia is caused by—

13 (A) a brain-based phonological deficit that

14 prevents an individual from breaking down

15 written words into component sounds;

16 (B) post-natal experience, including inad17 equate instruction; or

18 (C) a combination thereof; and

19 (3) the cost of implementing a program on a

20 nationwide basis to identify and treat children with

21 dyslexia in kindergarten through 3rd grade.

22 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date

23 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education

24 shall prepare and submit to the Congress a report contain-
3

•HR 78 IH

1 ing the results of the study conducted under subsection

2 (a).

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al., 

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT UDONIS HASLEM

Christopher S. Carver, Esq., of the law firm Akerman LLP, hereby enters his appearance

as counsel on behalf of Defendant Udonis Haslem and requests that copies of all orders, process, 

pleadings, and other documents filed or served in this matter be served on him via CM/ECF or at 

the address listed below, as appropriate.1

Respectfully submitted,

Date: April 7, 2023 AKERMAN LLP

201 East Las Olas Boulevard – Suite 1800

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301-2229

Tel.: 954-463-2700

Fax: 954-463-2224

By: /s/ Christopher S. Carver

Christopher S. Carver

Florida Bar No.: 993580

christopher.carver@akerman.com

Counsel for Defendant Udonis Haslem

1 The filing of this Notice of Appearance does not waive Defendant Haslem’s right to 

proper service of process, which right is fully preserved. Defendant Haslem intends to challenge 

the purported “service” – which was “effected” through the process server’s tossing the summons 

packet onto the windshield of his wife’s vehicle miles from his home, see ECF No. 88-2, pg. 6 –

by the April 14, 2023, deadline set by the Court. See ECF No. 49.

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 126 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 2.5 Authority.

These bylaws are adopted by the Board under the authority conferred upon the Postal Service by 39 U.S.C. 401(2) and 5 U.S.C. 552b(g).
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 627

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum

wage and to provide for an increase in such wage based on the cost

of living.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 1999

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase

the minimum wage and to provide for an increase in

such wage based on the cost of living.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Liveable Wage Act

5 of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE.

7 (a) RATE INCREASE.—Section 6(a)(1) of the Fair

8 Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) is

9 amended by striking out ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘1996,’’ and by in-
2

•HR 627 IH

1 serting before the semicolon the following: ‘‘, and not less

2 than $6.50 an hour after December 30, 1999’’.

3 (b) COST OF LIVING INCREASE.—Section 6 of the

4 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206) is

5 amended by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(g) At the beginning of each calendar year after De7 cember 30, 1999, the Secretary shall adjust the rate appli8 cable under subsection (a)(1) by the percentage increase

9 which is applicable to the primary insurance amount under

10 section 215(i) of the Social Security Act effective for bene11 fits payable in January of such calendar year.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 7, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 AM to 5 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Arthur L. Zachary, Office of Scientific Review, 
National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes 
of Health, Natcher Building, Room 1AS-13H, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
594-2886, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ea908b89828b98938baa84838d8799c4848382c48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4933282a21283b30280927202e243a67272021672e263f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel Initiative for Minority Student 
Development.
    Date: July 17-19, 2000.
    Time: 8 PM to 3 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact person: Michael A. Sesma, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, NIGMS, Natcher Bldg., 
Room1AS19H, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 14, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-15745 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 102-85.145 When are customer agencies responsible for Rent charges? ( a ) When a customer agency occupies cancelable space, it is responsible for Rent charges until: ( 1 ) The date of release specified in the OA, or until the date space is actually vacated, whichever occurs later; or
( 2 ) Four months after having provided GSA written notice of release; or
( 3 ) The date space is actually vacated, whenever occupancy extends beyond the date agreed upon under either paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section.
( b ) When a customer agency releases non-cancelable space, it is responsible for all attributable Rent and other space charges until the OA expires. This responsibility is mitigated to the extent that GSA is able to assign the space to another user or dispose of it. (See § 102-85.65 How does an OA obligate the customer agency?)
( c ) When a customer agency commits to occupy space in an OA or other binding document, but never occupies that space, that agency is responsible for: ( 1 ) Non-cancelable space: Rent payments due for the space until the OA expires, unless GSA can mitigate; or
( 2 ) All other space: Either GSA's space charges for 4 months plus the cost of tenant improvements or GSA's actual costs, whichever is less.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Moon,* Willis and Elder 

Argued at Richmond, Virginia 

JAMES A. ROBINSON 

 OPINION BY 

v. Record No. 0861-97-2 JUDGE NORMAN K. MOON 

 NOVEMBER 25, 1997 

TREGO STONE CORPORATION 

 and NIAGARA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 Brian J. Cuscé for appellant. 

 James G. Muncie, Jr. (Midkiff & Hiner, on 

brief), for appellees. 

 James A. Robinson suffered a compensable injury in 1989. 

The commission awarded him temporary total disability benefits in 

1989 but suspended that award in 1991 because of his third-party 

recovery. In 1996, Robinson applied for a new offset calculation 

based on Code § 65.2-313. Code § 65.2-313 was enacted in 1994 

and requires offset calculations and proportionate payments of 

litigation expenses incurred in obtaining a third-party award 

which suspends, in whole or in part, an employer's workers' 

compensation obligations. Robinson noted that absent such 

recalculation, he would not be entitled to additional payments of 

the employer's pro rata share of his litigation expenses until he 

has expended the entire third-party award. The commission found 

that the 1991 order was final and thus rejected his application. 

 

 *When the case was argued Judge Moon presided. Judge 

Fitzpatrick was elected Chief Judge effective November 19, 1997. 
- 2 - 

 We agree with the commission and affirm. 

Modification of Final Orders

 If an application for review of a final order of the 

commission is not made within twenty days of the date of the 

order, the commission has no jurisdiction to review the matter 

unless the petitioning party alleges fraud or mistake in the 

procurement of the award. McCarthy Electric Company, Inc. v. 

Foster, 17 Va. App. 344, 345, 437 S.E.2d 246, 247 (1993) (citing 

Code § 65.2-705(A)). Because Robinson failed to meet this time 

requirement and has not alleged fraud or mistake, the commission 

correctly found that it lacked authority to modify the 1991 

order. 

 Robinson contends that the legislature intended that Code 

§ 65.2-313 be applied retroactively. We need not address that 

issue because even if the statute could be applied retroactively, 

it could not be used to modify the 1991 order because Robinson 

failed to allege fraud or mistake. See Buenson Division, 

Aeronca, Inc. v. McCauley, 221 Va. 430, 434 n.2, 270 S.E.2d 734, 

736 n.2 (1980) (noting that a new statute with retroactive 

applicability cannot act to revive a "dead claim"); Dan River, 

Inc. v. Adkins, 3 Va. App. 320, 326, 349 S.E.2d 667, 670 (1986) 

(citing Buenson Division, 221 Va. at 434 n.2, 270 S.E.2d at 736 

n.2). 

 Robinson suggests that we avoid this rule by considering his 

request for a new offset calculation to constitute mere 

enforcement, rather than modification, of the 1991 order. He 
- 3 - 

further suggests that Code § 65.2-313 is procedural in nature, 

and thus the time limit imposed by the rule does not apply. No 

authority supports either suggested construction of the rule. 

 Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The purpose of this meeting is to discuss topics relevant to SSBN security. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on July 13, 2000 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Center for Naval Analyses, 4401 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lieutenant Commander Randy Craig, CNO-N875C2, 2000 Navy Pentagon, NC-1, Washington, DC 20350-2000, (703) 604-7392. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice of meeting is provided per the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2). The entire agenda will consist of classified information that is specifically authorized by Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense and is properly classified pursuant to such Executive Order. Accordingly, the Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing that all sessions of the meeting shall be closed to the public because they concern matters listed in 552b(c)(1) of title 5, U.S.C. 

Dated: June 13, 2000.

James L. Roth, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-15805 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
### TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM: Patrick Goodwin , ERG

DATE: September 30

, 2015

SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the National Scale Immediate

Receiving Water Model [DCN SE04593 ]

This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the National Scale Immediate Receiving Water (IRW) Model , developed as part of the Environme ntal Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA

- 821

- R

- 15

- 006 (DCN SE04527) . The supporting documentation for this model includes the files lis ted in Table 1.

Ta ble 1. Supporting Documentation

Attachment ID Document Name Brief Description

A1 Attachment 1: CBI_Final Steam

EA IRW Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database for EJ Cohorts

- Option A (CPP)

- DCN SE04593A1 CBI_Database used to compare the human health module results between baseline and Option A specifically for the cohorts used in the Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race population cohorts). Generates inputs for the Environmental J ustice calculation databases. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A2 Attachment 2 : CBI_Final Steam

EA IRW Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database for EJ Cohorts

- Option B (CPP)

- DCN SE04593A2 CBI_Database used to compare the human health module results between baseline and Option B specifically for the cohorts used in the Environmental Justice analysis (i.e.,

ra ce population cohorts). Generates inputs for the Environmental Justice calculation databases. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A3 Attachment 3 : CBI_Final Steam

EA IRW Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database for EJ Cohorts

- Option C (CPP)

- DCN SE04593A3 CBI_Database used to compare the human health module results between baseline and Option C specifically for the cohorts used in the Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race population cohorts). Generates inputs for the Environmental Justice calculation databases. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A4 Attachment 4 : CBI_Final Steam

EA IRW Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database for EJ Cohorts

- Option D (CPP)

- DCN SE04593A4 CBI_Database used to compare the human healt h module results between baseline and Option D specifically for the cohorts used in the Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race population cohorts). Generates inputs for the Environmental Justice calculation databases. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A 5 Attachment 5 : CBI_Final Steam

EA IRW Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database for EJ Cohorts

- Option E ( CPP)

- DCN SE04593A5 CBI_Database used to compare the human health module results between baseline and Option E specifically for the cohorts used in the Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race population cohorts). Generates inputs for the Environmental J ustice calculation databases. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.