alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB

House Calendar No. 23

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 751

[Report No. 106–57]

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 504 Hamilton Street in Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Edward

N. Cahn Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

MARCH 16, 1999

Reported with amendments, referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to

be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 504 Hamilton Street in Allentown,

Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Edward N. Cahn Federal Building

and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 751 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United

3 States courthouse located at 504 Hamilton Street in Al4 lentown, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as

5 the ‘‘Edward N. Cahn Federal Building and United States

6 Courthouse’’.

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

9 States to the Federal building and United States court10 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be

11 a reference to the ‘‘Edward N. Cahn Federal Building and

12 United States Courthouse’’.

13 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

14 The Federal building and United States courthouse lo15 cated at 504 West Hamilton Street in Allentown, Pennsyl16 vania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Edward N.

17 Cahn Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

18 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

19 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

20 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

21 building and United States courthouse referred to in section

22 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Edward N. Cahn

23 Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to designate

the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 504 West Hamilton Street in Allentown, Penn-
3

HR 751 RH

sylvania, as the ‘Edward N. Cahn Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’.’’.
House Calendar No. 23

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 751

[Report No. 106–57]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United

States Courthouse’’.ward N. Cahn Federal Building and UnitedStreet in Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘EdStates courthouse located at 504 Hamilton

MARCH 16, 1999

Reported with amendments, referred to the House

Calendar, and ordered to be printed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2811-001]

      ( print page 39381)    
Take notice that on June 16, 2000, ISO New England Inc. (the ISO), submitted corrected rate schedule pages for certain of those included in Attachments 16, 17 and 20 to its June 12 filing in this proceeding.

Copies of these materials were sent to the Secretary of the NEPOOL Participants Committee, the NEPOOL Participants, non-Participant transmission customers and the six New England state governors and regulatory commission.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 26, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-16014  Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134831 & (8) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 134831 

 COA: 279095 
 Wayne CC: 80-032542

PHILLIP ELLIOTT JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 14, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion to remand 

is DENIED. 

p1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2007 

 Clerk
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 4.5
                       FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

FIRST                                                  NBD Bank
CHICAGO                                                611 Woodward Avenue
NBD                                                    Mail Suite MI1-8074
                                                       Detroit, MI 48226
                                                       Telephone: (313) 225-2531
                                                       Fax: (313) 226-0855

Thomas A. Gamm
Vice President

April 1, 1999

Mr. Michael Yeager
Chief Financial Officer
Childtime Childcare, Inc.
38345 West 10 Mile Road, Suite 100
Farmington Hills, MI  48335

Dear Mike:

This letter serves to confirm that Childtime Childcare, Inc. has requested a
$5,000,000 reduction in the Revolving Credit that NBD Bank provides to Childtime
as described in the February 1, 1996 Credit Agreement. This reduction will
become effective on April 5, 1999 and will reduce the commitment amount to
$5,000,000. We will eliminate the unavailable tranche of the facility.

The $5,000,000 Revolving Credit will continue to include a sub-limit for letters
of credit in amounts not to exceed $1,275,000 in aggregate. The Revolving Credit
shall continue to have a maturity date of January 31, 2002.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Otherwise, please
acknowledge your agreement to the terms stated above by signing below and
returning this letter to my attention, first by fax and then by mail.

Sincerely,

/s/ THOMAS A. GAMM

Acknowledged and Agreed to this 2 day of April, 1999

CHILDTIME CHILDCARE, INC.

By: /s/ Michael M. Yeager

Its: CFO


                                       E-2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92—463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and Industrial Innovation—(1194).                    

*Date and Time:*                         July 14, 2000, 8 a.m.-5:30 pm.                    

*Place:*                         Room 330, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Kamalakar Rajurkar, Program Director, Manufacturing Machines, and Equipment, (703) 306-1330, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate XYZ-On-a-Chip proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 522b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: June 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-15826  Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Moscow CableCom Corp. for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

·

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Moscow CableCom Corp..

/s/            Warren L. MobleyName:     Warren L. Mobley
Title:       President and Chief Executive Officer 
Date:       August 12, 2005



/s/            Andrew M. OShea

Name:      Andrew M. OShea

Title:        Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Date:

August 12, 2005
§ 301-11.11 How do I select lodging and make lodging reservations? ( a ) You must make your lodging reservations through your agency's travel management service.
( b ) You should always stay in a “fire safe” facility. This is a facility that meets the fire safety requirements of the Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990 (the Act), as amended (*see* 5 U.S.C. 5707a).
( c ) When selecting a commercial lodging facility, first consideration should be given to government lodging agreement programs such as FedRooms® (*https://www.fedrooms.com*). The advantages of obtaining lodging using the FedRooms® program are: ( 1 ) Lodging rates are set at or below per diem rates;
( 2 ) There are no add-on fees;
( 3 ) The room cancellation deadline is 4 p.m. (or later) on the day of arrival;
( 4 ) Most hotels offer last standard room availability rates;
( 5 ) There are no early departure fees; and
( 6 ) Rates are available using all booking channels (e.g., E-Gov Travel Service, Travel Management Service, FedRooms® Web site, and hotel reservation call centers). The FedRooms® rate code (XVU) must be entered to get the program benefits.
Note to § 301-11.11 :
5 U.S.C. 5707a does not apply to the District of Columbia government.
[FTR Amdt. 2010-05, 75 FR 63104, Oct. 14, 2010, as amended at 85 FR 39848, July 2, 2020]
AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION 10-Q


                                   EXHIBIT 99

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT WILL BE RETAINED BY
     THE REGISTRANT AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of American Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned officers of
the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of their knowledge:

       (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

       (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




May 14, 2003                            BY: s/Carl H. Lindner
---------------------------                 -----------------------------------
Date                                        Carl H. Lindner
                                            Chairman of the Board and
                                              Chief Executive Officer




May 14, 2003                            BY: s/Fred J. Runk
---------------------------                 -----------------------------------
Date                                        Fred J. Runk
                                            Senior Vice President and Treasurer
















                                       31
#### § 301-2.3 What standard of care must I use in incurring travel expenses?

You must exercise the same care in incurring expenses that a prudent person would exercise if traveling on personal business.
Order entered April 18 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 00411 - CV IN RE: TRIANGLE SQUA RE, LTD., Relator Original Proceeding from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 41 6 - 04063 - 2012 

### O RDER Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the motion to dismiss and DISMISS this petition for writ of mandamus

. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of NICE-Systems Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Dafna
Gruber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

April 5, 2009

| |  | By:        /s/ Dafna Gruber
Dafna Gruber, Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### § 109-45.1004 Recovery and use of precious metals through the DOD Precious Metals Recovery Program.

DOE operates its own precious metals pool and therefore does not participate in the DOD Precious Metals Recovery Program. See § 109-27.5106 of this chapter for guidance on operation of the DOE precious metals pool.
§ 102-74.475 If an applicant proposes to use a public area to solicit funds, is the applicant required to make a certification? Yes, if an applicant proposes to use a public area to solicit funds, the applicant must certify, in writing, that— ( a ) The applicant is a representative of and will be soliciting funds for the sole benefit of a religion or religious group; or
( b ) The applicant's organization has received an official ruling of tax-exempt status from the Internal Revenue Service under 26 U.S.C. 501; or, alternatively, that an application for such a ruling is still pending.
#### ABRAHAM S. HERMAN, Respondent, *v.*HERMAN LYONS, Appellant.

*Off&i' of judgment*— tidal *of aetion before eeepiration of ten*days— *Oosts*— *Code,*§ 385.

After issue had been joined in this action, and on the seventh of February, an offer to allow judgment to be taken against him was served by the defendant; on the ninth of February the cause was regularly called in its order on the calendar, an inquest taken therein, and the costs accruing subsequent to the offer taxed in plaintiff’s favor. *Held,,*that, as ten days had not elapsed from the service of the offer of judgment to the time of trial, the plaintiff was entitled to disregard the offer and to tax the costs thereafter accruing.

Appeal from au order confirming an adjustment of costs by tbe clerk of tbe court.

--, for tbe appellant.

*Simon H. Stern,*for tbe respondent.

Brady, J.:

Tbe defendant served’ an offer to allow a judgment to be'taken against him. Tbe service was made on tbe seventh February last. On tbe ninth tbe cause was regularly called in its order and an inquest taken, and tbe costs which accrued subsequent to tbe offer were taxed in plaintiff’s favor. If tbe offer served stayed tbe plaintiff’s proceedings, or imposed any obbgation upon him to act in reference to it at once, it might be said that be was not entitled to any indemnity for such subsequent proceedings. He owed no duty to tbe defendant, however, under tbe three hundred and eighty-fifth section of tbe Code; tbe plaintiff has, in all such cases, ten days to elect whether be will accept tbe offer or proceed to trial; *112and if tbe offer be served so late tbat tbe cause is reached and tried before tbe expiration of tbe ten days, tbe offer is unavailable to tbe defendant. *(Pomeroy*v. *Hulin, etc.,*1 How. Pr. R., 161; *Walker*v. *Johnson,*8 id., 240 ; *Lunker*v. *Richnagel*[decided in tbis court February 25, 1859].) Tbe plaintiff herein, not having the ten days prior to tbe call of tbe cause in its regular order, was not obliged to pay any attention whatever to tbe offer. He could treat it as a nullity, which be did do, and proceed with bis action.

If tbe rule were otherwise, tbe service of an offer made when tbe cause was on tbe day calendar would prevent tbe plaintiff from proceeding to judgment, and might compel him to lose tbe term. Tbe adjustment and tbe order confirming it were right, and tbe appeal is of no benefit to tbe defendant.

Order appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and tbe disbursements of tbe appeal.

Daniels, J., concurred. Davis, P. J., not sitting.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
No. 11-9248.

#### Jones *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### § 105-72.307 Allowable costs.

For each kind of recipient, there is a set of Federal principles for determining allowable costs. Allowability of costs shall be determined in accordance with the cost principles applicable to the entity incurring the costs. Thus, allowability of costs incurred by State, local or federally-recognized Indian tribal governments is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-87, “Cost Principles for State and Local Governments.” The allowability of costs incurred by non-profit organizations is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-122, “Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations.” The allowability of costs incurred by institutions of higher education is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-21, “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.” The allowability of costs incurred by hospitals is determined in accordance with the provisions of appendix E of 45 CFR part 74, “Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Research and Development Under Grants and Contracts with Hospitals.” The allowability of costs incurred by commercial organizations and those non-profit organizations listed in Attachment C to Circular A-122 is determined in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) at 48 CFR part 31.
#### § 102-75.10 What basic real property disposal policy governs disposal agencies?

Disposal agencies must provide, in a timely, efficient, and cost effective manner, the full range of real estate services necessary to support their real property utilization and disposal needs. Landholding agencies must survey the real property under their custody or control to identify property that is not utilized, underutilized, or not being put to optimum use. Disposal agencies must have adequate procedures in place to promote the effective utilization and disposal of such real property.
Exhibit 31.4





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jay C. Horgen, certify that:





|   |                                                                                          
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







Date: March 31, 2015





/s/ JAY C. HORGENJay C. HorgenChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
§ 300-1.2 What is the purpose of the FTR? There are two principal purposes: ( a ) To interpret statutory and other policy requirements in a manner that balances the need to assure that official travel is conducted in a responsible manner with the need to minimize administrative costs;
( b ) To communicate the resulting policies in a clear manner to Federal agencies and employees.