alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 14765

- HH

________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus DEXTER DAVIS, a.k.a. Stump,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for th e Middle District of Georgia

________________________

Before: WILSON , WILLIAM PRYOR and JORDAN Circuit Judges

. BY THE COURT:
The Government ’ s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant ’ s plea agreement is GRANTED. See Uni ted States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

- 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard

- Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).

Case: 17-14765 Date Filed: 07/24/2018 Page: 1 of 22 JORDAN, Circuit Judge, concurring: There is an ambiguity in Mr. Davis ’ appeal w aiver because it is unclear who is the arbiter concerning the applicable “ advisory guideline range. ” Here, however, the ambiguity does not help Mr. Davis because even under his theor y, the guideline range was 151

- 188 month s , and he received a sentenc e of 144 months. In other words, Mr. Davis did not receive a sentence that “ exceeds the advisory guidelines range, ” no matter how that range is calculated.

Case: 17-14765 Date Filed: 07/24/2018 Page: 2 of 2
#### § 304-4.2 What is the purpose of this part?

The purpose of this part is to establish Governmentwide policy and guidance for acceptance by a Federal agency of payment for travel expenses from a non-Federal source for employees to attend meetings under 31 U.S.C. 1353. It prescribes how such payments may be accepted.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s/Marliss D. Johnson
 Marliss D. Johnson
 Vice President, Controller and Treasurer
 August 6, 2010
1

Subject: FW: Question regarding your STOTEN Paper

Attachments: Mortality paper fig S4 data.csv; Supplementary Material_20150714.docxFrom: Zhang, Kai [mailto:Kai.Zhang@uth.tmc.edu]Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 10:06 PM

To: Sacks, Jason <Sacks.Jason@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: Question regarding your STOTEN Paper

Hi Jason,

Thanks for your interest. Fig S4 results can be found in the attached csv file, and mean/Q3/max PM2.5 concentrations can be foun

document. Please let me know if you have any question.

Best,Kai_______________________________________________________________________________Kai Zhang, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences

UTHealth | The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston | School of Public Health

1200 Pressler Street | Room W606 | Houston, TX 77030

713.500.9249 tel | 713.500.9264 fax | kai.zhang@uth.tmc.edu | https://sph.uth.edu/kaizhang/

_______________________________________________________________________________From: Sacks, Jason [mailto:Sacks.Jason@epa.gov]Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:19 PMTo: Zhang, KaiSubject: Question regarding your STOTEN Paper

Dear Dr. Zhang,

My name is Jason Sacks, I’m an epidemiologist at the U.S. EPA. I have a question about your study titled “Fine particulate matter c

Greater Houston: did the risk reduce from 2000 to 2011?” in STOTEN in 2015. By any chance can you provide the quantitative est

S4 in the supplemental material? Specifically, the estimates for PM2.5 for the two time windows that you examine in the study (2
2

Also, by any chance do you also have a breakdown of mean and 75th percentile and maximum PM2.5 concentrations for the two t

Thanks in advance

Best regards,

Jason Sacks

Jason D. Sacks, M.P.H. Senior Epidemiologist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Center for Environmental Assessment Phone: 919-541-9729 Fax: 919-541-1818
#### § 301-10.104 What must I do if I change or do not use a common carrier reservation?

If you know you will change or not use your reservation, you must take action to change or cancel it as prescribed by your agency. Also, you must report all changes of your reservation according to your agency's procedures in an effort to prevent losses to the Government. Failure to do so may subject you to liability for any resulting losses.

[FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55702, Sept. 12, 2022]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6209

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
ROBERT PETER RUSSELL , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:91

- cr - 00056

- LMB

- 1 )

Submitted : June 22, 2023 Decided: June 27, 2023

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Robert Peter Russell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6209 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Robert Peter Russell appeals the district co urt’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that, under the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, compass ionate release was not warranted. See United States
v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329

- 31 (4th Cir. 2021 ) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release motions)

. Accordingly, we deny Russell’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6209 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 10-11088.

#### Ciriza-Saenz *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 879

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to exempt licenses in the

instructional television fixed service from competitive bidding.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Ms. WOOLSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to exempt licenses in the instructional television fixed service from

competitive bidding.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. EXEMPTION FROM COMPETITIVE BIDDING.

4 Section 309(j)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934

5 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(2)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph

7 (B);

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub9 paragraph (C) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and
2

•HR 879 IH

1 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub2 paragraph:

3 ‘‘(D) for stations in the instructional tele4 vision fixed service.’’.

Æ
§ 102-75.300 Are appraisals required for all real property disposal transactions? Generally, yes, appraisals are required for all real property disposal transactions, except when— ( a ) An appraisal will serve no useful purpose (e.g., legislation authorizes conveyance without monetary consideration or at a fixed price). This exception does not apply to negotiated sales to public agencies intending to use the property for a public purpose not covered by any of the special disposal provisions in subpart C of this part; or
( b ) The estimated fair market value of property to be offered on a competitive sale basis does not exceed $300,000.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2009 (the Report), I, Gregory Norden, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 7, 2009



By:

/s/ Gregory NordenGregory Norden Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2000 P
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2000 P
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2000 P
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2000 P
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2000 P
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2000 P
113A15

#### Patrick L. McCrory, et al. v. Philip E. Berger, et al.

Pit’s PWC to Review Order of Superior Court of Wake County

Special Order
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 548-549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-158]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA; Joint RTCA Special Committee 181/EUROCAE Working Group 13 
Standards of Navigation Performance

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a 
joint Special Committee 181/EUROCAE Working Group meeting to be held 
January 17-22, 2000, starting at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at 
the Honeywell, Inc. Commercial Aviation Systems, 21111 North 19th Ave, 
Phoenix, AZ 85036. The host, Mr. David Dwyer, may be reached at (602) 
436-7268 (phone), <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b6f6a7d6e256f7c726e794b686a78256364656e727c6e676725686466"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2a6a3b4a7eca6b5bba7b082a1a3b1ecaaadaca7bbb5a7aeaeeca1adaf">[email protected]</span></a> (email).
    The agenda will be as follows: January 17-18, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. 
(1) Working Groups 1 and 4 to meet separately; January 19, 9:00 a.m.-
noon, (2) Plenary Final Review DO-236A; January 20, 9:00 a.m.-noon, (3) 
Plenary Final Review DO-236A, 1:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m., (4) Final Review 
Moving Maps MOPS; January 21, 9:00 a.m.-noon (6) Plenary Final Review 
Moving Map MOPS; (7) Chairman's Remarks; (8) Working Group Reports; (9) 
Plenary Review DO-236A and Moving Maps MOPS; (10) Confirm dates of 
future meetings; (11) Other Business; (12) Closing.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may

[[Page 549]]

present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 22, 1999.
Gregory D. Burke,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 00-158 Filed 1-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/d07b1474/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 102-75.1250 What if the agency is not quite sure it wants the property and needs more time to decide?

If the written response to the “Notice of Availability” indicates a potential need, then the agency has an additional 30 days (from the expiration date of the “Notice of Availability”) to determine whether or not its has a definite requirement for the property, and then 60 days to submit a transfer request.
No. 11-9207.

#### Francis *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
                                                      REGISTRATION NO. 001-09078
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                            ------------------------

                                   FORM 10-Q/A-1

/X/  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
     1934
     FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1995

/ /  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
     FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                    TO

                         COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-9078

                            ------------------------

                             THE ALPINE GROUP, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


                  DELAWARE                                  22-1620387
       (State or other jurisdiction of                   (I.R.S. Employer
       incorporation or organization)                   Identification No.)


               1790 BROADWAY                                10019-1412
              NEW YORK, NEW YORK                            (Zip code)
             (Address of principal
               executive offices)


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code 212-757-3333

                            ------------------------

    Indicate  by check  mark whether  the Registrant  (1) has  filed all reports
required to be filed by  Section 13 or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act  of
1934  during the  preceding 12 months  and (2)  has been subject  to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  X      No
                                          ---       ---
    INDICATE THE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING OF EACH OF THE ISSUER'S CLASSES OF
COMMON STOCK, AS OF THE LATEST PRACTICABLE DATE.


               Class                           Outstanding at December 5, 1995
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
    Common Stock, $.10 Par Value                        18,251,779


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

    Pursuant to the  requirements of the  Securities Exchange Act  of 1934,  the
registrant  has  duly caused  this  report to  be signed  on  its behalf  by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                          THE ALPINE GROUP, INC.
Date: December 15, 1995
                                          By:        /s/ DAVID S. ALDRIDGE
                                              --------------------------------
                                              David S. Aldridge
                                              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
§ 102-37.400 What type of eligibility information must a SASP maintain on donees? In general, you must maintain the records required by your State plan to document donee eligibility (see appendix B of this part). For SEAs, you must maintain separate records that include: ( a ) Documentation verifying that the activity has been designated as eligible by DOD to receive surplus DOD property.
( b ) A statement designating one or more donee representative(s) to act for the SEA in acquiring property.
( c ) A listing of the types of property that are needed or have been authorized by DOD for use in the SEA's program.
§ 302-7.405 How must we arrange and pay for transportation of HHG and UAB, if we have authorized actual expense for transportation? When arranging transportation of HHG and UAB under the actual expense method, you should: ( a ) Determine the constructive cost of transporting the HHG plus the UAB, as follows: ( 1 ) Compute the cost of transporting the HHG (not including the UAB) in one lot, by the most economical means; be sure to include the cost of packing and unpacking.
( 2 ) Compute the cost of transporting the UAB.
( 3 ) If the HHG, including the UAB, exceeds the 18,000 pounds net weight allowance, then compute the cost of transporting only the net weight allowance as one shipment; again, be sure to include the cost of packing and unpacking.
( 4 ) The constructive cost is either that described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section or the sum of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, depending on whether the weight of the HHG, including the UAB, exceeds the net weight allowance.
( b ) Limit the employee's HHG plus UAB transportation payment to the constructive cost as described in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, so long as it is equal to or less than the 18,000 pound net limit of this Chapter;
( c ) Make arrangements for transporting the employee's HHG and UAB under two separate bills of lading, with direct payment by the agency for both; and
( d ) Advise employees of this relocation entitlement limitation and its potential to result in out-of-pocket expenses to the employee. That is, advise employees that they will have to use their personal funds to pay for transporting HHG (including UAB) in excess of 18,000 pounds net weight allowance.
§ 105-68.330 What requirements must I pass down to persons at lower tiers with whom I intend to do business? Before entering into a covered transaction with a participant at the next lower tier, you must require that participant to— ( a ) Comply with this subpart as a condition of participation in the transaction. You may do so using any method(s), unless § 105-68.440 requires you to use specific methods.
( b ) Pass the requirement to comply with this subpart to each person with whom the participant enters into a covered transaction at the next lower tier.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 835

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the

research credit and to adjust the alternative incremental credit rates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. CRANE, Mr.

COYNE, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. HERGER, Mr. CARDIN, Mr.

CAMP, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. SAM

JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Ms. DUNN, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. ENGLISH, Mrs. THURMAN,

Mr. WATKINS, Mr. WELLER, Mr. HULSHOF, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. LEWIS

of Kentucky, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. BALDACCI, Mr.

BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr.

CHAMBLISS, Mr. COOK, Mr. COX, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Ms. DEGETTE, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. DIXON, Mr.

DOOLEY of California, Mr. DREIER, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. EHRLICH, Ms.

ESHOO, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. FARR of California,

Mr. FILNER, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. FROST, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr.

HALL of Texas, Mr. HOLT, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon, Mr. INSLEE, Ms.

EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. KIND, Mr. KOLBE, Mr.

KUYKENDALL, Mr. LARSON, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma,

Mr. LUTHER, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mr. MCKEON, Mr.

METCALF, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. NEY, Mr.

PALLONE, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. PICKERING,

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. ROEMER, Mr. ROGAN, Mr. SANDLIN,

Mr. SAWYER, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. SMITH of

Washington, Mr. SNYDER, Ms. STABENOW, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. TOWNS,

Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania,

Mr. WU, Mr. WYNN, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, and Mr. VENTO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means
2

•HR 835 IH

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently

extend the research credit and to adjust the alternative

incremental credit rates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RESEARCH CREDIT.

4 (a) CREDIT MADE PERMANENT.—

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 41 of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to credit for increas7 ing research activities) is amended by striking sub8 section (h).

9 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1)

10 of section 45C(b) of such Code is amended by strik11 ing subparagraph (D).

12 (b) INCREASE IN ALTERNATIVE INCREMENTAL

13 CREDIT RATES.—Subparagraph (A) of section 41(c)(4) of

14 such Code is amended—

15 (1) by striking ‘‘1.65 percent’’ in clause (i) and

16 inserting ‘‘2.65 percent’’,

17 (2) by striking ‘‘2.2 percent’’ in clause (ii) and

18 inserting ‘‘3.2 percent’’, and

19 (3) by striking ‘‘2.75 percent’’ in clause (iii)

20 and inserting ‘‘3.75 percent’’.
3

•HR 835 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after

3 June 30, 1999.

Æ
250 E Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000 | 800-942-2677 | TTY 800-833-3722

To: Deborah Jeffrey

Inspector General 

From: Lori Giblin/s/

Chief Risk Officer 

Subject: High-Dollar Overpayments for the quarter ending September 30, 2018

Date: October 19, 2018

The purpose of this document is to comply with the High-Dollar overpayments' reporting 

requirements in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123, Appendix C. 

Appendix C requires agency heads to submit reports quarterly on High-Dollar 

overpayments to the Office of Inspector General.

The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) identifies high-dollar 

overpayments through improper payments testing, which will be completed in Q1 of 

2019. Therefore, during the reporting period covering 07/01/2018 through 09/30/2018, 

CNCS has not identified any high-dollar overpayments in its four susceptible programs: 

AmeriCorps State and National, the Foster Grandparent Program (FGP), the Retired and 

Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP), and the Senior Companion Program (SCP).

This report upholds the Corporation’s commitment to carrying out the Executive Order’s 

goals of eliminating payment errors. Reducing improper payments remains vital for the 

Corporation. We continue to monitor programs in order to reduce the amount of 

overpayments.