alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
facilityid loc type lon lat utm zone elev

Type of 

Receptor state

01033NEI8522 L -87.587397 34.778017 P AL

01115NEIALT$4622 L -86.199584 33.931363 P AL

01115NEIALT$4622 L -86.200363 33.936438 P AL

05059NEIART$10783 L -92.903767 34.459023 P AR

05115NEI3AR05115JW L -93.085686 35.265121 P AR

05115NEI3AR05115JW L -93.079024 35.26304 P AR

18003NEIIN00286 L -84.953735 41.07128 P IN

18003NEIIN00286 L -84.947747 41.071281 P IN

18093NEI3IN18093Rec L -86.520543 38.922842 P IN

18093NEI3IN18093Rec L -86.524143 38.92022 P IN

18093NEI3IN18093Rec L -86.514386 38.924346 P IN

18169NEI3IN18169Ale L -85.881048 40.79482 P IN

21031NEIKY2103100 L -86.718359 37.21046 P KY

21031NEIKY2103100 L -86.721656 37.211118 P KY

21031NEIKY2103100 L -86.725464 37.208058 P KY

21141NEIKY2114100 L -86.931913 36.952404 P KY

21141NEIKY2114100 L -86.942279 36.95039 P KY

21141NEIKY2114100 L -86.946466 36.939526 P KY

21151NEI3KY21151Nov L -84.309515 37.606076 P KY

21151NEI3KY21151Nov L -84.299801 37.605811 P KY

39157NEI3OH39157Ale L -81.346036 40.365602 P OH

39157NEI3OH39157Ale L -81.333095 40.372154 P OH

39157NEIOHT$6308 L -81.346036 40.365602 P OH

39157NEIOHT$6308 L -81.333095 40.372154 P OH

45015NEI3SC45015JW L -80.053341 33.031849 P SC

45015NEI3SC45015JW L -80.047689 33.031301 P SC

46135NEI790 L -97.347586 42.885604 P SD

46135NEI790 L -97.343427 42.887043 P SD

47159NEI3TN47159Wil L -85.936942 36.208448 P TN

47159NEI3TN47159Wil L -85.952842 36.20618 P TN

47159NEI3TN47159Wil L -85.95049 36.202373 P TN

47159NEI3TN47159Wil L -85.931397 36.199316 P TN

48029NEI7212 L -98.372657 29.279064 P TX

53073NEIWA19906 L -122.700378 48.858223 P WA

53073NEIWA19906 L -122.688199 48.848727 P WA
comment added for

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL

Additional receptor SAL
#### § 301-31.3 Are members of my family and I eligible for payment of subsistence and transportation expense?

Yes, if you serve in a law enforcement, investigative, or similar capacity for special law enforcement/investigative purposes and your agency authorizes such expenses.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-82,784-01

EX P ARTE TRAVIS JAMES GUILLORY, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 11-11914-A IN THE CRIMINA L DIST RICT COURT

F ROM JEF F ERSON COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant was convicted of the offense of poss es s i on of a controlled subst ance as a habitual felony offe nder and sentenc ed to imprisonment for twenty -five y ear s. The Ninth Court of Appeals aff irmed hi s conviction. Guillory v. Stat e , No. 09-12-00574- CR (Tex. App— Bea umont J une 20, 2013)( not desig nated f or publication). On J anuar

y 22, 2015, a timely o rder desig nating issues was signe d by the trial court. The habea s rec ord has been forwa rded to this Court prema turely

. We rema n d t h i s ap p l i cation to the Criminal Di s t ri ct Court of J eff erson County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiar yinvestiga tion, obtain the ordere d aff idavits, and enter

finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s o f t h i s o rd er. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of t he date of t his order . Any extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Mar ch 4, 2015 Do not publish
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5615

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the conduct or support of programs

of HIV testing that fail to make every reasonable effort to inform

the individuals of the results of the testing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 1, 2000

Mr. COBURN (for himself, and Mr. NORWOOD) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the conduct or

support of programs of HIV testing that fail to make

every reasonable effort to inform the individuals of the

results of the testing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Right to Know Act

5 of 2000’’.

6 SEC. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds as follows:
2

•HR 5615 IH

1 (1) The Centers for Disease Control and Pre2 vention is currently funding HIV serosurveillance

3 studies at various locations throughout the United

4 States.

5 (2) These studies are designed to determine the

6 prevalence of a disease within particular populations

7 using ‘‘blind’’ tests in which blood specimens are

8 taken from individuals and tested for HIV without

9 their knowledge, identifying elements are removed,

10 and test results are withheld from the source pa11 tient.

12 (3) Blind HIV tests threaten the health and life

13 of an infected individual by withholding from that

14 individual the knowledge that could protect and en15 hance his or her health through appropriate treat16 ment.

17 (4) Blind HIV tests threaten the public health

18 and allow others to become needlessly infected with

19 HIV by denying an infected individual the knowledge

20 of their infection thereby allowing them to unknow21 ingly place others at risk of infection.

22 (5) For the reasons stated in paragraphs (3)

23 and (4):

24 (A) Studies that test individuals for HIV

25 without their knowledge and that do not dis-
3

•HR 5615 IH

1 close positive test results to source patients are

2 unethical.

3 (B) Anyone who is diagnosed with HIV

4 should be told the results of such test and pro5 vided with appropriate counseling regarding

6 care and prevention.

7 (C) The Federal government and others

8 conducting blind HIV studies should imme9 diately cease such activities.

10 (D) The Federal government and others

11 who have conducted blind HIV tests should

12 make every possible effort to notify those who

13 have been diagnosed with HIV.

14 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION REGARDING USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS

15 FOR HIV TESTING.

16 None of the amounts made available in any Federal

17 appropriations Act for any fiscal year may be used to con18 duct or support any program of testing individuals for in19 fection with the human immunodeficiency virus in which

20 there is a failure to make every reasonable effort to find

21 and disclose to the tested individuals the results of the

22 testing (including testing performed on blood samples the

23 individuals provided for other purposes), together with ap24 propriate counseling.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6563
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GBOLAHAN FRANCIS TAYO, a/k/a Douglas Warren Johnson, a/k/a John Doe, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-95-28-BR, CA-95-106-5) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Gbolahan Francis Tayo, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas B. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Tayo , No. CR-95-28-BR; CA-95-106-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 4.5

                        CERTIFICATE OF RETIREMENT

                                 OF THE

                  SERIES F CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

                                   OF

                    THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.


         Pursuant to Section 243(b) of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware

         The Ashton Technology Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), HEREBY CERTIFIES as
follows:

         1. All outstanding shares of the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock
have been exchanged for 9% Secured Convertible Notes.

         2. Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of Section 243(b) of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, upon filing of this
Certificate of Retirement, all the shares of the Series F Convertible Preferred
Stock shall be retired and the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
shall be amended so as to eliminate all reference to the Series F Preferred
Stock and then all such shares will assume the status of authorized and unissued
Shares of Preferred Stock.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Retirement to be executed and attested and its corporate seal to be affixed
hereto this 17th day of January 2002.

                                       THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.


                                       By:  /S/  Fredric W. Rittereise
                                            --------------------------
                                           Fredric W. Rittereiser
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM

GRACE, INC.; ENGAGE MIAMI, INC.; 

SOUTH DADE BRANCH OF THE NAACP; 

MIAMI-DADE BRANCH OF THE NAACP; 

CLARICE COOPER; YANELIS VALDES;

JARED JOHNSON; and ALEXANDRA 

CONTRERAS,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF MIAMI,

 Defendant.

/

CERTIFICATION OF GREGORY P. LUIB

Gregory P. Luib, Esq., pursuant to Rule 4(b)(1) of the Rules Governing the Admission, 

Practice, Peer Review, and Discipline of Attorneys, hereby certifies that: (1) I have studied the 

Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; (2) I am a 

member in good standing of the New York and Washington, D.C. bars, as well as the bar of the 

United States Supreme Court; and (3) I have not filed more than three pro hac vice motions in 

different cases in this District within the last 365 days.

/s/ Gregory P. Luib 

 Gregory P. Luib

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 114-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 301-11.604 What are the procedures for calculation and reimbursement of my WTA and ETTRA for taxable extended TDY?+ ( a ) If your agency knows from the beginning of your TDY assignment that your assignment qualifies as taxable extended TDY, then your agency will withhold an amount as a WTA and pay that as withholding tax to the IRS until your extended TDY assignment ends. The WTA itself is taxable income to you, so your agency increases, or “grosses-up,” the amount of the WTA, using a formula to reimburse you for the additional taxes on the WTA.
( b ) If your agency realizes during a TDY assignment that you will incur taxes (because, for example, the TDY assignment has lasted, or is going to last, longer than originally intended), then your agency will compute the WTA for all taxable benefits received since the date it was recognized that you are no longer “temporarily away from home” (see § 302-11.601 for more information on the meaning of “temporarily away from home”). Your agency will pay that amount to the IRS, and then will begin paying WTA to the IRS until your extended TDY assignment ends.
( c ) For your ETTRA, your agency will use the same one-year or two-year process that it has chosen to use for the relocation income tax allowance (RITA).
( d ) See part 302-17 of this subtitle for additional information on the WTA and RITA processes.
Note to § 301-11.604 :
If your agency offers you the choice, the WTA is optional to you. See §§ 302-17.61 through 302-17.69.
[FTR Amdt. 2014-01, 79 FR 49643, Aug. 21, 2014]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-

14(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Analogic Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John J. Millerick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 7, 2008



/s/ John J. MillerickJohn J. MillerickChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                          REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or
                    RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          (AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

           I, Richard W. Lucas, as Chief Financial Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 29, 2005

                                                     /s/ Richard W. Lucas
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Richard W. Lucas
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
**Docket Number: FAA -**  **2012 -**  **1226**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
                               FDS - 2ND QUARTER
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0000006207
<NAME>                         AMREP CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
<CURRENCY>                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   OCT-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1
<CASH>                           17,608
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    61,459
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                      70,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0
<PP&E>                           32,716
<DEPRECIATION>                   14,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  185,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 0
<BONDS>                          38,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                            740
<OTHER-SE>                       92,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    185,794
<SALES>                          46,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 76,348
<CGS>                            38,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    64,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                1,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   3,258
<INCOME-TAX>                      1,303
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               1,955
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                      1,955
<EPS-BASIC>                      0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0



</TABLE>
«Case 88 — Motion by Glendora M. Stanley', Appellee, to Dismiss the Appeal of S. R. Ewino Against Her fob Failure to File Transcript in Time.

June 22, 1901.

(Omitted In former reports.)

#### Ewing v. Stanley.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

Motion to Dismiss Appeal, Sustained.

Appeals — Dismissal—Failure to File Transcript in Time. ■ .

Where a motion is made by appellee in the court of appeals to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the transcript is not filed twenty days before the first day of the second term of the court of appeals «after the rendition of the judgment in the lower court, appellant can not impeach the record by filing the affidavit of the deputy clerk of the court to the effect that the judgment appealed from was not handed into the clerk’s office and entered of record until a date later than that shown by the record. If appellant was delayed in obtaining a transcript by the delay of the court he should have obtained an extension in this court for filing it.

SWEENEY, ELLIS & SWEENEY, for appellant.

J. D. ATCHISON, for appellee.

*690Opinion op ti-ie court by

CHIEF JUSTICE PAYNTER

Dismissing.

The judgment from which the appeal was granted purports to have been rendered November 10,1900. The appeal was granted in the court below. Section 738, Civil Code of Practice, provides that the appellant shall file the transcript in the office of the clerk of the court of appeals at least twenty days before the first day of the second term thereof next after the granting of the appeal, unless the court extended the time. Section 740 provides that if the appellant fails to file the transcript within the time allowed by section 738, his appeal shall be dismissed. The transcript had not been filed on the 19th of the present month, and thereupon the appellee filed a copy of the judgment, etc., and moved to dismiss the appeal. The court not having extended the timo for filing the transcript, the appeal should be dismissed, unless for the reasons hereinafter stated.

In order to prevent the motion to dismiss from prevailing, the appellant filed the affidavit of a deputy in the office of the circuit clerk, to the effect that the judgment mentioned was not handed into the clerk’s office by the special judge and entered of record until the 19th of January, 1901. He thus seeks to impeach the correctness of the date of the order of the court by an affidavit. We do not think he should be permitted to do so. The records of the court should not be disregarded in the manner proposed. If the appellant was delayed in obtaining a transcript by the delay of the court, Which he claims existed, he could have obtained an extension in this court for filing it.

The appeal is dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice #3327] 

The Working Group on Safety of Navigation of the Subcommittee on Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) will conduct an open meeting at 9:30 AM on Thursday, June 22, 2000, in room 6103, U. S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, S.W., Washington, DC. 

The purpose of the meeting is to prepare for the 46th session of the Subcommittee on Safety of Navigation (NAV) of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) which is scheduled for July 10-14, 2000, at the IMO Headquarters in London. 

Items of principal interest on the agenda are: 

—Routing of ships, ship reporting and related matters 

—Amendments to the International Regulations for Prevention of Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS) 

—Integrated bridge systems (IBS) operational aspects 

—Guidelines on ergonomic criteria for bridge equipment and layout 

—Navigational aids and related matters 

—International Telecommunication Union (ITU) matters, including Radiocommunication ITU-R Study Group 8 

—IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases 

—Guidelines relating to SOLAS chapter V 

—Comprehensive review of chapter 13 of the High Speed Craft (HSC) Code 

—Development of guidelines for ships operating in ice-covered waters 

Members of the public may attend these meetings up to the seating capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by writing: Mr. Edward J. LaRue, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard (G-MWV-3), Room 1407, 2100 Second Street SW, Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling: (202) 267-0416. 

Dated: June 9, 2000.

Stephen M. Miller, 

Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee. 

[FR Doc. 00-15313 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-07-U