alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-3604

___________

Gaylon Richard Cox, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

United States of America, * [PUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 28, 2002

Filed: July 1, 2002

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gaylon Richard Cox pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting bank robbery, being

a felon in possession of a firearm, and attempting to escape from custody. The

district court sentenced Cox to life imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c). Cox

appealed, and we affirmed. See United States v. Cox, 225 F.3d 1018 (8th Cir. 2000).

Cox then filed the present 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion asserting four grounds for

relief. The district court denied the motion, and granted a certificate of appealability

(COA) on two issues: whether Cox's guilty plea was involuntary because of mental

illness and medication, and whether he was denied effective assistance of counsel.
-2-

On appeal, Cox argues counsel was ineffective for failing to request an independent

psychiatric evaluation, by which to show Cox's incompetence, and for failing to

petition for certiorari as promised. He also attempts to challenge the application of

section 3559(c), but our review is limited to the issues specified in the COA. See

Hubbeling v. United States, 288 F.3d 363, 364-65 (8th Cir. 2002).

We conclude Cox did not establish counsel's ineffectiveness on the competency

issue. See United States v. Duke, 50 F.3d 571, 576 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S.

885 (1995); Iron Wing v. United States, 34 F.3d 662, 664 (8th Cir. 1994). No

evidence suggests the court-ordered psychiatric evaluation–finding Cox legally

responsible at the time of the offense and competent to stand trial–was flawed. See

Pool v. Armontrout, 852 F.2d 372, 376-77 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S.

1023 (1989). Moreover, at the plea hearing Cox stated he understood the charge and

understood he faced a life sentence if the government prevailed on its section 3559(c)

motion; the district court, having observed his demeanor and behavior in the

courtroom, found he behaved rationally throughout the proceedings; and no evidence

indicates any medication rendered him incompetent. See United States v. JimenezVillasenor, 270 F.3d 554, 561 (8th Cir. 2001).

We agree with the government, however, in light of counsel's failure to file the

promised petition for certiorari, that our judgment affirming Cox's conviction should

be vacated and a new judgment entered to allow the timely filing of the petition. See

Wilkins v. United States, 441 U.S. 468, 469 (1979) (per curiam); Wilson v. United

States, 554 F.2d 893, 894 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 849 (1977).

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment entered on September 19, 2000 in United States

v. Cox, No. 00-1610, and direct the clerk to enter a new judgment. We otherwise

affirm the district court.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 54 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 54

 To extend the authorization for the Upper Delaware Citizens Advisory 
                                Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

  Mr. Gilman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the authorization for the Upper Delaware Citizens Advisory 
                                Council.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR UPPER DELAWARE CITIZENS 
              ADVISORY COUNCIL.

    The last sentence of paragraph (1) of section 704(f) of the 
National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 1274 note) is 
amended by striking ``20'' and inserting ``30''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 PLACEMENT
AGENT AGREEMENT 
 January 30, 2017 

This First Amendment to that certain Placement Agent Agreement (this “Amendment”) dated January 30, 2017 is made by and
between CytoDyn Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Paulson Investment Company, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company (the “Placement Agent”), as of the date first above written. 

WHEREAS, the parties previously entered into that certain Placement Agent Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2017 (the
“Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth below, the parties agree as follows: 

1. Term. Section 3(c) of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: 

In the event that the Company consummates a sale of its securities (whether debt or equity) to a Qualified Investor within the six
(6) month period immediately following the date of termination or expiration of this Agreement (the “Tail Period”) pursuant to which the Placement Agent would have been entitled to the compensation set forth in Section 2
of this Agreement had the sale occurred during the term of this Agreement, then at the closing of each such investment during the Tail Period, the Company shall pay the Placement Agent the compensation as set forth in Section 2 hereof
(including PA Warrants), in the amounts equal to the compensation that the Placement Agent would have earned from such investments had the Company closed on such investments prior to the termination of this Agreement. 

2. Ratification of Agreement; Effect of Amendment. The Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed, and
all other terms and conditions of the Agreement not addressed in this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect; provided, however, that in the event of a conflict between this Amendment and the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment are
paramount and supersede any such conflicting provisions. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 







 The parties have executed this Placement Agent Agreement as of the date first written above. 

 

			
	CytoDyn Inc.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael D. Mulholland
		 	Michael D. Mulholland
		 	Chief Financial Officer


  

			
	PAULSON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Byron Crowe
		 	Byron Crowe
		 	Chief Executive Officer
# Comments on: 23-1014: CONTENT SQUARE ISRAEL LTD. v. DECIBEL INSIGHT, LTD. [ORDER], Nonprecedential
#### § 102-41.10 To whom do “we”, “you”, and their variants refer?

Use of pronouns “we”, “you”, and their variants throughout this part refer to the agency having custody of the personal property.
1 

### Ostigaard, Crystal

From: Rose Bender [rose@northernplains.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 3:42 PM To: Ostigaard, Crystal Subject: YVCC's comments on Yellowstone County SO2 nonattain ment Attachments: YVCCltrtoEPA2013-06-07.pdf



### Dear Ms. Ostigaard,

Thank you for accepting Yellowstone Valley Citizens Council's comments on SO2 nonattainment status for Yellowstone County. They are attached. Please conta ct me with any questions.

Thank you, Rose Bender

-- Rose Bender Rose Bender Field Organizer Northern Plains Resource Council 220 S. 27th Street, Suite A Billings, MT 59101 Phone: 406.248.1154 ext.107 Fax: 406.248.2110



### rose@northernplains.org www.northernplains.org

Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlo ok prevented auto matic download of this picture from the Internet. Northern Plains Resource Council is a grassroots co nservation and family agriculture group. We organiz e Montana citizens to protect our water quality, family farms and ranches , and unique quality of life. If you aren't a member, you should join!
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 634

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to guarantee that Medicare

beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare+Choice plans offering prescription

drug coverage have access to a Medigap policy that offers similar prescription drug coverage in the event the Medicare+Choice plan terminates service in the area in which the beneficiary resides.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1999

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. GILCHREST, and Mr. CUMMINGS) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means,

and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to guarantee

that Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare+Choice

plans offering prescription drug coverage have access

to a Medigap policy that offers similar prescription drug

coverage in the event the Medicare+Choice plan terminates service in the area in which the beneficiary resides.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 634 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medigap Access Pro3 tection for Seniors Act of 1999’’.

4 SEC. 2. GUARANTEED ACCESS FOR CERTAIN MEDICARE

5 BENEFICIARIES TO MEDIGAP POLICIES OF6 FERING DRUG BENEFITS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1882(s)(3)(C) of the So8 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ss(s)(3)(C)) is

9 amended—

10 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘Subject to clauses

11 (ii) and (iii),’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to clauses (ii),

12 (iii), and (v),’’; and

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new

14 clause:

15 ‘‘(v)(I) In the case of an individual who is enrolled

16 with an organization described in subclause (II), a Medi17 care supplemental policy described in this subparagraph

18 includes a Medicare supplemental policy which has a bene19 fit package classified as ‘‘H’’, ‘‘I’’, or ‘‘J’’ under the stand20 ards established under subsection (p)(2), or in the case

21 of a State described in subsection (p)(6), a Medicare sup22 plemental policy offered in such State that includes in its

23 benefits package coverage of outpatient prescription

24 drugs.

25 ‘‘(II) For purposes of subclause (I), an organization

26 described in this subclause is a Medicare+Choice organi-
3

•HR 634 IH

1 zation under a Medicare+Choice plan under part C or an

2 eligible organization under a contract under section 1876

3 that provided as a part of its benefits package coverage

4 of outpatient prescription drugs, and that terminates such

5 enrollment with respect to all individuals in the area in

6 which the individual resides.’’.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 subsection (a) take effect on the date of the enactment

9 of this Act.

Æ
**3. AEATF Removal Efficiency Study Protocol** 

a. EPA Science and Ethics Review b. AEATF Volume 1: Transmittal Letter, Checklist c. AEATF Volume 2: Protocol, IRB Conditional Approval Letter, Supporting Documents d. AEATF Volume 3: IR B Review Records e. AEATF Volume 4: AEATF

- II SOPs cited in the protocol f. Schulman Associates IRB Standard Operating Procedures g. Charge Questions
1FW: Question regarding your STOTEN PaperSubject:Attachments:Mortality paper fig S4 data.csv; Supplementary Material_20150714.docxFrom:Zhang,Kai[mailto:Kai.Zhang@uth.tmc.edu]Sent:Saturday,April09,201610:06PMTo:Sacks,Jason<Sacks.Jason@epa.gov>Subject:RE:QuestionregardingyourSTOTENPaperHiJason,Thanksforyourinterest.FigS4resultscanbefoundintheattachedcsvfile,andmean/Q3/maxPM2.5concentrationscanbefoundintheattachedworddocument.Pleaseletmeknowifyouhaveanyquestion.Best,Kai_______________________________________________________________________________KaiZhang,Ph.D.AssistantProfessor,Dept.ofEpidemiology,HumanGeneticsandEnvironmentalSciencesUTHealth|TheUniversityofTexasHealthScienceCenteratHouston|SchoolofPublicHealth1200PresslerStreet|RoomW606|Houston,TX77030713.500.9249tel|713.500.9264fax|kai.zhang@uth.tmc.edu|https://sph.uth.edu/kaizhang/_______________________________________________________________________________From:Sacks,Jason[mailto:Sacks.Jason@epa.gov]Sent:Wednesday,April6,20161:19PMTo:Zhang,KaiSubject:QuestionregardingyourSTOTENPaperDearDr.Zhang,MynameisJasonSacks,I’manepidemiologistattheU.S.EPA.Ihaveaquestionaboutyourstudytitled“FineparticulatemattercomponentsandmortalityinGreaterHouston:didtheriskreducefrom2000to2011?”inSTOTENin2015.ByanychancecanyouprovidethequantitativeestimatesthatcorrespondtoFigS4inthesupplementalmaterial?Specifically,theestimatesforPM2.5forthetwotimewindowsthatyouexamineinthestudy(2000–2005and2006–2011).2Also,byanychancedoyoualsohaveabreakdownofmeanand75thpercentileandmaximumPM2.5concentrationsforthetwotimeperiods?ThanksinadvanceBestregards,JasonSacksJason D. Sacks, M.P.H.Senior EpidemiologistU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyNational Center for Environmental AssessmentPhone: 919-541-9729Fax: 919-541-1818
Confidential Diagram

Removed
##### 



Exhibit 32

Certifications

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2003 of AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of, Jay S.
Wintrob, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and N. Scott Gillis, Senior
Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                       
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ JAY S. WINTROB                                                    
| |  |                                                                       
| |  | Jay S. Wintrob
Chief Executive Officer                                
| |  |                                                                       
| |  | /s/ N. Scott Gillis                                                   
| |  |                                                                       
| |  | N. Scott Gillis,
Senior Vice President and
Principal Financial Officer
§ 109-1.5304 Deviations. ( a ) Life cycle control determinations. When the PSO approves a contractor program containing controls, other than life cycle control consistent with this subpart, the decision shall be justified in writing and a copy sent to the Office of Management. A PSO's decision not to provide life-cycle control should take into account: ( 1 ) The nature and extent of high risk property typically purchased or otherwise brought to a DOE or designated contractor facility or site;
( 2 ) The projected stability of DOE and designated contractor operations; and
( 3 ) The degree of confidence in the property control measures available at disposition.
( b ) Certain transfers, sales, or other offerings of high risk personal property may require special conditions or specific restrictions as determined necessary by the property custodian or cognizant program office.
( c ) Requests for deviations from the requirements of this subpart may be made through the cognizant PSO to the Office of Management.
344P14

#### State v. Gary Maurice Walters

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA14-51)

1. Allowed 09/19/2014

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Allowed

3. State’s PDR under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Allowed

4. Defs PDR of an Additional Issue

4. Denied

Ervin, J.,

recused
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
American Financial Corporation 10-Q for September 30, 1995 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         178,966
<SECURITIES>                                 8,253,962<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  409,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,396,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        749,416
<COMMON>                                         9,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,880
<PREFERRED>                                    168,484
<OTHER-SE>                                     390,955
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,396,286
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,722,790
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               176,919
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                114,047
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             82,898
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,048)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    79,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Includes an investment in affiliates of $832 million.
<F2>Not applicable since all common shares are owned by American Financial
Group.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.csv.TextAndCSVParser">
<meta name="Content-Encoding" content="ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="X-TIKA:detectedEncoding" content="ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="2491">
<meta name="X-TIKA:encodingDetector" content="UniversalEncodingDetector">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><p>
begin 644 m09679f5alcanbcn.gif
M1TE&.#EAM`!\`*(```E;IDJ&O82MTZK'X-CE\?___\+6Z?'U^B'Y!```````
M+`````"T`'P```/_6+K<_C#*2><A->O-N_]@J!R!(9YHJJYG`)AL+,_TY[YU
MKN^T`/PPGG!(S`Q^0(5A4&PZAT<DKF``8)[8[(H@35)_5ZUXO.%VI]4?><V&
MD,YH9'L^OYUA:0!]/[;?E7)\@DX^<%YY"P*#BSI1AG%J"@!,C)4L>8]X@05@
MEIXG9H^'FTAAGZ<:;Z*CD9P_BJBQ%*JKD'J2K[*Z$7ZKFJU(L+O#"H6UK+>N
M`+`'Q+J.Q[8+P<64SI^AT=*XR\56UY[9VK_)U`6%IN!\M-K;RK"%`>J+O>.`
MP+GG/_+S?/7V7_!UTP>`7[\YT-HAFY8OWL$YF!0NY`9OGP("01YB$2?1_YTY
MAU_2:23"KJ/'AA:_!&@VLLD_B>08#@29QF!+(2]AWBN'LN#.C#=S)#0Y\9TW
MGP&G!,W!D>C)F2GS`%T:HZG"``(,F")02&9%I%*ITBBI4(#(!D$^1D4"0P!+
ML2ERUG++02U8M@H"V(0;PIC.#C>^\@M;P(4UOA^&:CN;P87@GWE_'$9<ANC;
M#P(>)X41F'('LM$8;SC0=JV7SIXWR!4E+`5-O(7SI:[@5V&,UZ=ESY:@.-ID
M%+BGH%ZR^X'5:#*"<\Y7133E`TY;JU`>>6"5E<47K%[U&[AIX<Q3%J\M\;**
M*(-A#]\TNW>[&6;2Y[;.WO-Q;7M7?%].OY5GT/]7T;!?=;`@,MMVQ^2GPH"Q
M]9>,@C>11Q1\#*X'C'0W1>04`.:E@!YD#19(BE(W0;=A%U-Y=]=\(@KD'#@`
M$H6ABO*!YZ!702$H47(5AB?0C/.XMV%W(E`7XDXXCG3?B;?U>"-%(YEXXB-`
M@F"DA3P--$"'Q.CHU(L9E+:BC2UF"0^$ND@XY1E@3H#5437R5V:2/E2)BI!K
M2M$F!'7""2*6='HQS))Y2I$B!:A=Z:.9?G99J#9T;6!7G`0B"25!:'KBY:.O
MO&C-I'\N&BA2SW#:$59:,<#5CXT2!NBE(,E"J*FUQ`2KDW/>BA0!>[(1(ZW1
MV&H4IJ$^.2Q-V&D*[(;_PH*Z6:5)C9I>I@@MRZREQ^**K;-I$#G'K-:*TFQ/
ME!X9K:XU]II%N->>F^V8<FY++HB";,KN'^YRJYZHZ-*[AYKW!BLO5/!":^"[
MY>X!;L"&C$MPN:\B[.\<##OEL&:N\BOQLX5QF86]%1LZ,,;[&JOO:=06`7#(
MM8[<:LFY;IRQG41HR#)`!Y],ILO$<GR#NF/=3-3%+[/(LZ(#?2RT243WG+')
M\_JL&R%+MZ.77E?D'/73,>L<+Q8VWZQ79@:4[<$2616]<[Y;PXR%E"%CE170
M'O!ZD=ML/UPL+`1X7`/(1.DU@`%^"T$:2Q%[;7#*+*R\)JJ#&"``)5KK+35]
M_S1O`>SD=)-!P`W2[GU/YQYPBA4&A5L2AN+F'OQWGI.GOLL`?3J-M^LS.!Y-
MVE1=@73,%$;G;5"?%]QZ?3$$/CQ<I(GNK@R`FY6=<;=OPO@&>)X1P/+3#U""
MP:1PK\'"!9%>7.+?G/"K%,E.WT$A71<D.Z()SN]^!%S%G_0'8;-O__T2>$OE
M,B>!)07`?`"$P`!#D)/M)5`&44B2!P`6J0?&X`#",,?_=M*%`UJ0!Q\YU`/@
M)@4"?C`%:K'?/T1XPABDH2*,(\_UV,"5JUV-=[L@P5=HQA$3/L![-@33YZ[6
M.0S.Q7X"L"'CAJA$OS'1@^-KE!O.(+XI=I`"F&`A!/^R)P7N:2AS-FL?6D3V
M/O$\H!=:#*"$EI?%T>A.>Q,PQ(O")L8%M+&,I')`0A#8O\+=,0/DR0I+2!/(
M"*B)6OVK8U)(I($/44]/(N@"-.ST1PHDI((-,"(9&Y`-K'11`ICH11TKN8'K
M7,04?D`@07+A!Q&24@*2M&2G()!*$OHMBZ(<(VP\X#TE&,0O5<0?^^Z&!#2]
M$@*=S(!S_`*+24:@C;FTXR;K!@A%8,*'O(#D4:8FS5U.P"\;M")[6JE`,O9"
M&,?L0!K0EAEL\JF$#4CE`]+I`+^@@)P+@!N$[EB2&C'R`_D+9@5(V,YV^D%!
M]&R`7U09D8)FQ@\S^F-)K#FW33;8ZS<)514\0R`1D4BTGQE]`A?/8)Z0RD0R
MEI0;X1(AD?R0LI\5'0,[E$C383+`I!Q<AL<TB01*B(.F2OSD32MZ@!BEL0G`
M=-,T0^G0IF:&I5T0Y`@D!\?J="("MARJ-_/YDJ,2(9D6Z((`=Z0=B0B#F5BT
M*0=35-05MD&>%$!K3H^AR]TM0!R-V20];>95(1C`ACY4XEV=2MAV.H"G5+H,
7$/7BU2<*XXG.>2+66EA#)>+P)@D``#L_
`
end

</p>
</body></html>
Case 9:22-cv-81758-XXXX Document 1-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/11/2022 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:22-cv-81758-XXXX Document 1-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/11/2022 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15569]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP00-380-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

June 15, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 7, 2000, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), 12801 Fair Lakes Parkway, Fairfax, Virginia 
22030-0146, filed in Docket No. CP00-380-000, a request pursuant to 
sections 157.205 and 157.208 (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.208) of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act, and Columbia's 
authorization in Docket No. CP83-76-000, 22 FERC Paragraph 62,029 
(1983) to increase the maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) of 
its existing delivery lateral pipeline designated as K-212 located in 
Ohio. Columbia states the uprate is necessary in order to provide 
volumes of natural gas and the pressure requested by Southeastern 
Natural Gas Company, who will use the gas to serve Shelly Asphalt Plant 
located in Licking County, Ohio. The application may be viewed on the 
web at www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm. Call (202) 208-2222 for 
assistance.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days after the 
issuance of the instant notice by Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 
of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and, pursuant to section 157.205 of 
the regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest 
to the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15569 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M