alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15788]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2363-000]


Allied Companies, L.L.C.; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 19, 2000.
    Allied Companies, L.L.C. (Allied) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Allied will engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy transactions as a marketer. Allied also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, Allied requested that 
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Allied.
    On June 9, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applicants, Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates, 
granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the 
following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Allied should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Allied is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Allied's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 10, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15788 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Corautus Genetics Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack W. Callicutt, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jack W. CallicuttJack W. CallicuttSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 30, 2007
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 661

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to proadopts certain aircraft noise regulations. with stage 3 noise levels if the European Union transport category aircraft that do not comply hibit the commercial operation of supersonic
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 661

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to prohibit the

commercial operation of supersonic transport category

aircraft that do not comply with stage 3 noise levels

if the European Union adopts certain aircraft noise regulations.
2

•HR 661 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF SUPERSONIC

4 TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRCRAFT.

5 If the European Union adopts Common Position

6 (EC) No. 66/98 as a final regulation or adopts any similar

7 final regulation, the Secretary of Transportation shall pro8 hibit, after such date of adoption, the commercial oper9 ation of a civil supersonic transport category aircraft to

10 or from an airport in the United States unless the Sec11 retary finds that the aircraft complies with stage 3 noise

12 levels.

Passed the House of Representatives March 3,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. PEACOCK FARM, INC., RODOLPHE T. LYNCH, and WILLARD A. RHODES

No. 230A15

Filed 18 December 2015

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,_N.C. App._, 772 S.E.2d 495 (2015), dismissing an interlocutory appeal from an order entered on 5 June 2012, as certified under Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) by 'an order entered on 16 April 2014, both by Judge Anderson D. Cromer in Superior Court, Moore County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 17 November 2015.

*Howard, Stallings, From, Hutson, Atkins, Angelí & Davis, P.A., by JohnN. Hutson, Jr. andMatthewM. Lawless, for plaintiff-appellee.*

*Van Camp, Meacham & Newman, PLLC, by William M. Van O’Linda, Jr., for defendant-appellant Rodolphe T. Lynch.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the majority opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. We remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court so that additional proceedings may be held not inconsistent with the opinion.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
SCWC-13-0005555

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

SIXTO MANUEL,

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0005555; S.P.P. NO. 13-1-0018; CR. NO. 00-1-2103)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant’s Application for Writ

of Certiorari, filed on March 30, 2015, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 4, 2015. 

Cynthia A. Kagiwada

for petitioner

James M. Anderson

for respondent

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0005555

04-MAY-2015

08:48 AM
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1091 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-037-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

2.0 $ 170.00 $ 170.00 7 $1,190.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,190

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

12.0 $1,020.00 $1,087 $2,107.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
#### § 105-74.515 Are there any exceptions to those actions?

The Administrator of General Services may waive with respect to a particular award, in writing, a suspension of payments under an award, suspension or termination of an award, or suspension or debarment of a recipient if the Administrator of General Services determines that such a waiver would be in the public interest. This exception authority cannot be delegated to any other official.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Haddrill,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, tomy knowledge:

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

Date:  June 20,2007
| /s/ Richard Haddrill                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard Haddrill                       |   |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000004187
<NAME> INDUSTRIAL SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         480,802
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,196,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                   146,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,391,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,312,383
<PP&E>                                       7,830,338
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,854,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,137,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,607,946
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,575
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,558,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,137,176
<SALES>                                     17,066,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,066,732
<CGS>                                       15,422,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,422,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,302,424
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                241,219
<INCOME-TAX>                                   106,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            134,919
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   134,919
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
#### § 102-75.225 Who must review and approve a request for exception from the 100 percent reimbursement requirement?

The Administrator must review all requests for exception from the 100 percent reimbursement requirement. If the Administrator approves the request, it is then submitted to OMB for final concurrence. If OMB approves the request, then GSA may complete the transfer.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The following
certification accompanies the issuers Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and is not
filed, as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986 dated June 5, 2003.

In connection
with the Annual Report of Eagle Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal year ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Peter J. Johnson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Clinton J. Morrison, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigneds
knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

|                         |                                        |                          | 
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|/s/ Peter J.
 Johnson    |                                        | /s/ Clinton
 J. Morrison | 
|                         |                                        |                          | 
|Peter J.
 Johnson        | Clinton J.
 Morrison                  
|Chief
 Executive Officer | Senior VP
 and Chief Financial Officer
|September
 15, 2008      | September
 15, 2008                   

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 69 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 69

  To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit all 
individuals who are not citizens or nationals of the United States from 
 making contributions or expenditures in connection with elections for 
                            Federal office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

 Mr. Bereuter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit all 
individuals who are not citizens or nationals of the United States from 
 making contributions or expenditures in connection with elections for 
                            Federal office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Illegal Foreign Contributions 
Prohibition Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING ALL NON-CITIZEN INDIVIDUALS FROM MAKING 
              CONTRIBUTIONS OR EXPENDITURES IN CONNECTION WITH 
              ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL OFFICE.

    (a) Prohibition Applicable to All Individuals Who Are Not Citizens 
or Nationals of the United States.--Section 319(b)(2) of the Federal 
Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441e(b)(2)) is amended by 
striking the period at the end and inserting the following: ``, or in 
the case of an election for Federal office, an individual who is not a 
citizen of the United States or a national of the United States (as 
defined in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act).''.
    (b) Prohibition Applicable to Expenditures.--
            (1) In general.--Section 319(a) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 
        441e(a)) is amended by inserting ``or expenditure'' after 
        ``contribution'' each place it appears.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 319 of such Act (2 
        U.S.C. 441e) is amended in the heading by inserting ``and 
        expenditures'' after ``contributions''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
contributions or expenditures made on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998 
<CASH>                                              37,066 
<SECURITIES>                                     1,277,656 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      414,752 
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0 
<INVENTORY>                                              0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,752,918 
<PP&E>                                             775,268 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      10,209 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,528,186 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,864,993 
<BONDS>                                                  0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                           155,595 
<OTHER-SE>                                               0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,528,186 
<SALES>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    90,165 
<CGS>                                                    0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   357,473 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (267,308)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  88,881 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (267,308)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (267,308)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      (267,308)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.034)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.034)
                                               


</TABLE>
#### § 102-74.480 How many days does a Federal agency have to issue a permit following receipt of a completed application?

Federal agencies must issue permits within 10 working days following the receipt of the completed applications, unless the permit is disapproved in accordance with § 102-74.500.
rtk-ex102_6.htm



EXHIBIT 10.2

 

AMENDMENT TO

SIDE LETTER BETWEEN RENTECH AND GSO

 

To:Rentech, Inc. (“Rentech”)

Rentech Nitrogen Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”)

DSHC, LLC (“DSHC”)

10880 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1101
Los Angeles, CA 90024

 

From:GSO Capital Partners LP (“GSO”)

345 Park Avenue, 31st floor

New York, NY 10154

 

Date: January 20, 2017

Dear Sirs:

Reference is made to that Side Letter by and among Rentech, Holdings, DSHC, GSO and the GSO Funds identified therein dated as of April 4, 2016 (the “Side Letter”).  All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Side Letter.  The parties hereby agree that the section of the Side Letter entitled “Transaction Agreement” which deals with the Board Designation Matters is hereby terminated. 

This Amendment to the Side Letter shall only become effective upon the execution and effectiveness of Amendment No. 1 to the GSO Transaction Agreement to the Transaction Agreement effective as of April 1, 2016 by and among CVR Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, Coffeyville Resources, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, GSO Capital Partners LP, a Delaware limited partnership, and each of the Holders listed on Schedule A thereto.  Except as otherwise provided herein, each party confirms and agrees that the Side Letter is, and shall continue to be, in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.  

 

[Signature Pages Follow]






 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Side Letter has been executed by the parties hereto and is intended to be and is hereby delivered on the date first before written.

 

 

GSO CAPITAL PARTNERS LP

 

 

By:/s/ Marisa Beeney________

Name:  Marisa Beeney

Title:    Authorized Signatory

 

GSO SPECIAL SITUATIONS OVERSEAS MASTER FUND LTD. 

GSO SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND LP

STEAMBOAT CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND LP 

GSO COASTLINE CREDIT PARTNERS LP

GSO CACTUS CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND LP

GSO AIGUILLE DES GRANDS MONTETS FUND II LP 

 

By: GSO Capital Partners LP, as Investment Manager

 

 

By:/s/ Marisa Beeney________

Name:  Marisa Beeney

Title:    Authorized Signatory

 

GSO SSOMF NITRO BLOCKER LLC

STEAMBOAT NITRO BLOCKER LLC

GSO ADGM II NITRO BLOCKER LLC 

 

 

By:/s/ Marisa Beeney________

Name:  Marisa Beeney

Title:    Authorized Signatory

 

GSO CREDIT-A PARTNERS LP

By: GSO Credit-A Associates LLC, its general partner

 

 

By:/s/ Marisa Beeney________

Name:  Marisa Beeney

Title:    Authorized Signatory

 

2



 

 

GSO PALMETTO OPPORTUNISTIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS LP

By: GSO Palmetto Opportunistic Associates LLC, its general partner

 

By:/s/ Marisa Beeney________

Name:  Marisa Beeney

Title:    Authorized Signatory

 




3



 

RENTECH, INC.

 

 

 

By:/s/ Colin Morris_________

Name: Colin Morris

Title:   SVP & GC

 

RENTECH NITROGEN HOLDINGS, INC.

 

 

 

By:/s/ Colin Morris_________

Name: Colin Morris

Title:   SVP & Secretary

 

 

DSHC, LLC

 

 

 

By:/s/ Colin Morris_________

Name: Colin Morris

Title:   President

 

 

4