alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF MOSS ADAMS LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Director and Shareholders AltiGen Communications, Inc.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-148404, 333-121753, and 333-117000 of AltiGen
Communications, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated December 29, 2008, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AltiGen
Communications, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2008.

/s/
MOSS ADAMS LLP

San
Francisco, California
December 29, 2008

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-10737.

#### Moraga *v.*McDaniel, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 101-26.203 Activity address codes.

To obtain items through the FEDSTRIP system, each ordering activity is required to have an activity address code. The FEDSTRIP Operating Guide (FPMR 101-26.2) contains instructions to civilian agencies on requesting activity address codes. Once assigned, an activity address code allows an activity to order supplies under the FEDSTRIP system. Because there is a potential for abuse in the use of these codes, agencies shall establish stringent internal controls to ensure that the codes are used only by authorized personnel. It is imperative that all requests for activity address codes or deletions or address changes flow through a central contact point in the agency headquarters or regions where the need, purpose, and validity of the request can be verified. Agencies should send GSA the addresses of the contact points (mailing address: General Services Administration (FSR), Washington, DC 20406). GSA will only honor requests from the established points within the agency. GSA will periodically send a listing of current activity address codes and addresses to contact points for review.

[45 FR 71565, Oct. 29, 1980]
#### § 105-53.135 [Reserved]
Order entered September 13, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00954 - CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE R UTH BAKER

AND GREGORY JOSEPH F INSTER On Appea l from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 17 - 13669



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s September 12, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the t ime to October 11, 2019

. Appellee shall file her brief in response to the amended brief filed by appellant on August 14, 2019.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 15




December 8, 2003


Albertson's, Inc.
Boise, Idaho

We have made a review, in accordance with standards  established by the American
Institute of Certified Public  Accountants,  of the unaudited  interim financial
information  of  Albertson's,   Inc.  and  subsidiaries  for  the  thirteen  and
thirty-nine  week  periods  ended  October 30, 2003 and  October  31,  2002,  as
indicated  in our report dated  December 4, 2003;  because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware  that our  report  referred  to above,  which is  included  in your
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  thirteen  and  thirty-nine  week periods
ended October 30, 2003, is incorporated  by reference in Registration  Statement
No.  33-54998 on Form S-3 and  Registration  Statement  Nos.  2-80776,  33-2139,
33-7901, 33-15062, 33-43635, 33-62799, 33-59803, 333-82157, 333-82161, 333-87773
and 333-73194 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report,  pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the  Securities  Act of  1933,  is not  considered  a part  of the  Registration
Statement  prepared  or  certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared  or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/S/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boise, Idaho
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8489-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8533-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8534-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8547-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8548-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8549-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8550-BER

IN RE: SEALED SEARCH WARRANTS

__________________________________________/

OMNIBUS ORDER 

On September 1, 2023, the United States submitted in camera a proposed 

redacted version of its responses to the Motions to Intervene and to Unseal Search 

Warrant Materials in the above-captioned cases. There is good cause for the proposed 

redactions that overcomes any public right of access.

WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED that on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on 

September 8, 2023, the United States shall file the redacted responses in the public 

record in each of the above-captioned cases.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach 

County, in the Southern District of Florida, this 5th day of September 2023.

__________________________________

BRUCE E. REINHART

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 9:22-mj-08489-BER Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 705 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 705

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 1999

                                Received

                           February 22, 1999

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To make technical corrections with respect to the monthly reports 
 submitted by the Postmaster General on official mail of the House of 
                            Representatives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS REGARDING REPORTS BY POSTMASTER 
              GENERAL ON OFFICIAL MAIL OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

    (a) In General.--Section 311(b)(2) of the Legislative Branch 
Appropriations Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C. 59e(b)(2)) is amended by striking 
``any person with an allocation under subsection (a)(2)'' and inserting 
the following: ``any person with an allocation under subsection 
(a)(2)(A) as to the amount that has been used and any person with an 
allocation under subsection (a)(2)(B)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to January 1999 and each succeeding month.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 11, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

COLLECTIVE ACTION

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER,

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

CONSENT TO JOIN PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. §216(b)

1. My name is _____________________________________.

2. I consent, agree, and opt to become a Plaintiff in this lawsuit brought under the 

FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., against my current/former employer, 450 North River Drive, LLC,

d/b/a Kiki on the River, and alleged employers RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones (collectively 

“Defendants”).

3. I wish to assert a claim for alleged unpaid/underpaid tips against Kiki on the River 

and the other Defendants for the tips I allege I’m owed.

4. I agree to be bound by any adjudication of this action by the Court, whether it is 

favorable or unfavorable. I further agree to be bound by any collective action settlement herein 

that is recommended by FairLaw Firm, approved by the Class Representative, and approved by 

the Court as fair and reasonable.

5. I designate the FairLaw Firm to represent me in this case.

Dated ______________, 2023. Signed:_________________________

Printed Name:____________________

Your Address, Email, and Telephone Are Needed, But Will Not Filed With The Court

Address: _________________________________ Tel No.:___________________________

_________________________________ Email: ____________________________

MAIL, EMAIL, OR FAX YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO:

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33156 / brian@fairlawattorney.com

TEL 305.230.4884 TEXT 786.386.0885 FAX 305.230.4844

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 1 Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 196-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2023 Page 1 of 1
**Statement of Steve Feder DO FAAP, FACOP** Immediate Past President, Maine Chapter American Academy of Pediatrics
The Maine Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (MAAP), stands with the National AAP in agreement with the broad scientific consensus that the e arth ’ s climate is warming rapidly and at an accelerating rate and we recognize that there is a greater t han 90% probability that the main cause of this is the burning of fossil fuels. We believe that the result of this will include numerous health effects to children. We firmly assert that children are a more vulnerable population with respect to adverse effects of climate change and that children living in poverty are disproportionately affected.
In that light, the AAP makes five concrete recommendations to government (at all levels spanning from the smallest municipalities to the international policy sphe re). These include:
1. Develop aggressive long

- term policies to reduce the major contributing factors to global climate change 2. Invest in public health care systems, including immunization programs and disease surveillance, reporting/tracking. 3. Give specific attention to children in emergency management and disaster response. 4. Support public awareness and education about the threats from climate change and their implications for children's health, particularly those living in poverty. 5. Fund inte rdisciplinary research that will help both mitigate and adapt to climate change particularly in areas with direct implications for children's health.
It is key for physicians to be involved as advocates, role models, educators (of future physicians in pa rticular) and to help build coalitions to mitigate the effects of climate change.
In Maine we unfortunately have large numbers of children living in poverty (about one in every four). This is cause for significant concern when it comes to matters of publ ic health like climate change. We also live in an area abundant in natural beauty and amidst a population that enjoys this beauty in all seasons. As such, we should stand united, as Mainers, in protecting our children, protecting our future and protecting our environment from those who are responsible for hastening climate change through irresponsible use and burning of fossil fuels.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1661
MOOG, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STEPAN V. LUNIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00238-RBS) Submitted: January 17, 2007 Decided: February 14, 2007 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stepan V. Lunin, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Roy Zahn, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia; William Harrison Baxter, II, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Stepan V. Lunin appeals the district court’s order granting Moog, Inc.’s (“Moog”) motion for a preliminary injunction against him. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeMoog, Inc. v. Lunin , No. 2:06-cv-00238-RBS (E.D. Va. June 7, 2006). Further, we grant Moog’s motions for protective orders, filed September 6, 2006, September 11, 2006, September 15, 2006, September 25, 2006, and September 29, 2006, in which Moog seeks to seal various pleadings Lunin filed with this court. However, we deny Moog’s September 18, 2006 motion for a protective order because the document this motion targets was never filed with this court. Further, we deny Moog’s August 29, 2006 motion for a protective order because it is duplicative of the relief requested in the September 6, 2006 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit (32)

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of American Greetings
Corporation on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), each of the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American Greetings Corporation.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

July 8, 2009



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Zev Weiss                                                                  
|Zev Weiss                                                                      
|Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)                          
|                                                                               
|/s/ Stephen J. Smith                                                           
|Stephen J. Smith                                                               
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE:

9:30 a.m., Tuesday, June 27, 2000.

# PLACE:

NTSB Board Room, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# STATUS:

Open to the Public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

7266 Safety Report: Emergency Evacuation of Commercial Airplanes.

7256 Special Investigation Report: Actions to Reduce Fatalities, Injuries, and Crashes involving the Hard Core Drinking Driver.

# NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodation should contact Mrs. Barbara Bush at (202) 314-6220 by Friday, June 23, 2000.

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rhonda Underwood (202) 314-6065.

Dated: June 16, 2000.

Rhonda Underwood,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-15699  Filed 6-16-00; 3:01 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
#### Andrew R. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No, 1D16-4757.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 17, 2016.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 2017.

*806Andrew R. Johnson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED. *See Baker v. State,*878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). The court hereby reserves jurisdiction to consider the imposition of sanctions against petitioner.

ROWE, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
§ 109-40.5003 Commercial bills of lading. ( a ) DOE's cost-type contractors using commercial bills of lading in making shipments for the account of DOE shall include the following statement on all commercial bills of lading: This shipment is for the account of the U.S. Government which will assume the freight charges and is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the standard form of the U.S. Government bills of lading and to any available special rates or charges.
( b ) The language in paragraph (a) of this section may be varied without materially changing its substance to satisfy the needs of particular cost-type contractors for the purpose of obtaining the benefit of the lowest available rates for the account of the Government.
( c ) Where practicable, commercial bills of lading shall provide for consignment of a shipment to DOE c/o the cost-type contractor or by the contractor “for the DOE.”
( d ) Commercial bills of lading exceeding $10,000 issued by cost-type contractors shall be annotated with a typewritten, rubber stamp, or similar impression containing the following wording:
Equal Employment Opportunity. All provisions of Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor are incorporated herein.
No. 11-8681.

#### Taylor *v.*Miami-Dade County Department of Corrections et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 109-38.502-50 DOE guidelines. ( a ) Whenever practicable and cost effective, commercial service facilities shall be utilized for the maintenance of motor vehicles.
( b ) Individual vehicle maintenance records shall be kept to provide records of past repairs, as a control against unnecessary repairs and excessive maintenance, and as an aid in determining the most economical time for replacement.
( c ) One-time maintenance and repair limitations shall be established by the motor equipment fleet manager. To exceed repair limitations, approval of the motor equipment fleet manager is required.
( d ) ( 1 ) Motor vehicles under manufacturer's warranty shall be repaired under the terms of the warranty.
( 2 ) When motor vehicles are maintained in Government repair facilities in isolated locations that are distant from franchised dealer facilities, or when it is not practical to return the vehicles to a dealer, a billback agreement shall be sought from manufacturers to permit warranty work to be performed on a reimbursable basis.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Victor M. Perez, Chief Financial Officer of Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     *Date: May 10, 2006*By: */s/ Victor M. Perez*         *Victor M. Perez*    *Chief Financial Officer*
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.1


                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                                      OF
                   THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                                 UROGEN CORP.


The undersigned certify that:

     1.  They are the President and Corporate Secretary, respectively, of Urogen
Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation").

     2.  Article I of the Restated Certificate of the Corporation is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                                   ARTICLE I
                                   ---------

     "The name of the corporation (which is hereinafter referred to as the
"Corporation") is:

                      "GenStar Therapeutics Corporation"


     3.  The foregoing amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation
has been duly approved by the board of directors.

     4.  The foregoing amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation
has been duly approved by the required vote of stockholders in accordance with
Sections 228 and 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

     The undersigned further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of
the State of Delaware that the matters set forth in this certificate are true
and correct of their own knowledge.

DATE: March 21, 2000

                                    /s/ ROBERT E. SOBOL
                                    ____________________________________________
                                    Robert E. Sobol, President

                                    /s/ CARIN D. SANDVIK
                                    ____________________________________________
                                    Carin D. Sandvik, Corporate Secretary