alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

Case Number: 22-20571-CR-MARTINEZ-BECERRA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

V. 

JOSE HUGO ESTUPINAN, et. al, 

Defendants. 

I -------------

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable Jacqueline Becerra, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation on Defendant Jose Hugo Estupinan's Motion 

to Dismiss, which Defendants Ramon Gabriel Bautista-Feliciano and Alcibiades Jimenez-Flores 

adopted. (ECF Nos. 29, 32, 33). After conducting an evidentiary hearing, Judge Becerra filed a 

Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending that the Motion to Dismiss be denied. 

(ECF No. 50). Defendant Jose Hugo Estupinan filed objections to the R&R ("Objections"). (ECF 

No. 51). The Court, having conducted a de nova review of the record and the issues presented in 

the Objections, agrees with Magistrate Judge Becerra that the Motion to Dismiss must be denied. 

The Court overrules the Objections, (ECF No. 51 ). 

Accordingly, after careful consideration, it is hereby ADJUDGED that 

1. United States Magistrate Judge Becerra's Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 

50), is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 29), is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ~1> day of March, 2023. 

Copies provided to: 

Magistrate Judge Becerra 

All Counsel of Record 

RTINEZ 

ATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:22-cr-20571-JEM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/20/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-75.785 What specifically must DOJ or FEMA address in the assignment request or recommendation that is submitted to the disposal agency? Any determination that DOJ or FEMA submits to the disposal agency must provide complete information concerning the correctional facility, law enforcement, or emergency management response use, including— ( a ) Identification of the property;
( b ) Certification that the property is required for correctional facility, law enforcement, or emergency management response use;
( c ) A copy of the approved application that defines the proposed plan of use; and
( d ) The environmental impact of the proposed correctional facility, law enforcement, or emergency management response use.
# Comments on: 2021-2088: Penley v. McDonough
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. AN TONI O G OM EZ , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 30173 D . C . N o. 2: 09 -c r- 06 05 1-W F N -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on W m . F r e m m i ng N i e l s e n, S e ni orD i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 15, 2011 S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B efo re: K L E IN F E L D , T A S H IM A , an d S IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B a s e d o n th e a f

f id a v it in s u p p o rt o f

th e ap p lic a tio n f

o rth e s e a r c h w a rr a n t, un der the t ot al i ty of the ci rc um st ance s, there w as a “ fa i r probabi l i ty that c ontr aba nd ore vi de nc e of ac r i m e ” w oul d ha ve be e n f ound a tthe N orth H ugo



# FI LED APR21 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

A venu e property. T hu s, the m agi stra t e had a s ub st ant i al basi s t o d et erm i ne that pr obabl e c aus e e xi s t e d. S e e ge ne r a l l yU ni t e d S t a t e s v. C r e w s , 502 F . 3d 1130, 1135 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ; I llin o is v . G a te s , 4 6 2 U .S . 2 1 3 , 2 3 8 ( 1 9 8 3 ) . B e c au s e th e s e a r c h w a rr a n t au th o r iz e d o f f ic e r s to s e ar c h f

o r“a n ya n d a ll pape rw ork, doc um e nt s , ve hi c l e r e gi s tr a t i ons , dr i ve r ’ s l i c e ns e s , ori de nt i f i c a t i on c a r ds w i th the na m e s S e r gi o B e t e l G om e z , A nt oni o G om e z ora nyc om bi na t i on there of” on them , the se ar ch of the ra g w as w i thi n the sc op e of the w arrant . C f. U n ite d S ta te s v . G o m e z - S o to , 7 2 3 F .2 d 6 4 9 , 6 5 4 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 4 ) ( “I t is a x io m a tic thati f aw arrantsuff

i ci ent l y des cr i bes the prem i se s t o b e s earc hed, thi s w i l l j ust i fy as e a r c h of

the pe r s ona l e f

f e c t s the r e i n be l ongi ng t o the pe r s on oc c upy i ng the p r e m is e s if

th o s e o b je c ts m ig h t c o n ta in th e ite m s d e s c r ib e d in th e w a rr a n t.” ( e m pha s i s a dde d) ) . A dr i ve r ’ s l i c e ns e w i th af a l s e na m e , ors e ve r a l , m i ghtw e l l be c onc e a l e d i n ar a g. A l s o , th e o f

f i c e rw a s p e r f

o rmi n g “ a n o th e rw i s e l a w f u l s e a r c h ” f

o rth e i t e ms s pe c i f i e d i n the w a rr a nt , a nd w oul d i m m e di a t e l yr e c ogni z e the i t e m i n the r a g by f e e l a s e vi de nc e of

ac r i m e . T hus , unde rthe “ pl a i n t ouc h” e xc e pt i on t o the3

e x c lu s io n a ry ru le , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t e rrin r e f u s in g to s u p p r e s s th e f

ir e a rm . S ee M i nn es ot a v. D i cker son, 50 8 U . S . 36 6 (19 93 ).

AF F I R ME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This  schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet  and  statement  income  for Anchor National Life Insurance Company's Form
10-Q  for  the  quarter  ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference  to  such  financial  statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     3,826,556
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              0
<EQUITIES>                                       0
<MORTGAGE>                                 674,396
<REAL-ESTATE>                               24,000
<TOTAL-INVEST>                           5,276,353
<CASH>                                     365,597
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                   1,187,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          28,292,495
<POLICY-LOSSES>                          5,302,638
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             53,514
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     3,511
<OTHER-SE>                                 945,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            28,292,495
<PREMIUMS>                                       0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        204,319
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                          (5,408)
<OTHER-INCOME>                             281,312
<BENEFITS>                                (129,000)
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                (74,329)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                       (26,796)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            165,865
<INCOME-TAX>                               (59,853)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        106,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               106,012
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          0


</TABLE>
#### § 105-64.401 Can I amend my record?

You may request to amend your record by writing to the system manager with the proposed amendment. Mark both the envelope and the letter “Privacy Act Request to Amend Record”.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 39429)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on November 15, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Die Products Consortium (“DPC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) The identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are Amkor Technology, Inc., West Chester PA; Chip Supply, Inc., Orlando, FL; Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, San Jose, CA; Honeywell, Inc., Minneapolis, MN; Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA; Lucent Technologies, Inc., Murray Hill, NJ, Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation, Austin, TX; National Semiconductor Corporation, Santa Clara, CA; Rockwell Collins, Inc., Cedar Rapids, IA; Tempo Electronics, North Hollywood, CA; and Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX. The nature and objectives of the venture are to provide leadership to the microelectronics industry to promote methods for improved die product (including flip chip) quality, reliability, handling, shipping, and associated infrastructure at lowest cost to meet the needs of users for smaller form factor, higher performance, lower cost products.                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-16003  Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This FIRST AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (as defined below) is dated as of January 27, 2017
and is entered into between VOLT INFORMATION SCIENCES, INC., a New York corporation (the “Company”), and MICHAEL D. DEAN (the “Executive”). 

WHEREAS, on October 19, 2015, the Company and the Executive entered into an employment agreement (the “Employment
Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into this Amendment in order to amend a certain provision of the Employment
Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, such amended provision of the Employment Agreement shall become effective as of the date of this Amendment. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows: 
 1. The definition of “Good Reason” in Section 26(h) of the
Employment Agreement is hereby amended such that the following subsection is deleted in its entirety and the remaining subsections are renumbered accordingly: 

“(v) The Company’s failure to provide the Executive during any year of the Employment Term with long-term incentive compensation opportunity with a
target value at grant of at least $1,600,000 (based on the valuation method used by the Company for financial reporting purposes) through a combination of stock option grants, restricted stock units or other equity-based awards, cash-based long-term
plans or other components, and in such proportions and subject to such conditions, as may be determined by the Company from time to time in its sole discretion and in good faith;” 

Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. 

[Signature page to follow] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

  

			
	VOLT INFORMATION SCIENCES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Nancy Avedissian

	Name:	 	Nancy Avedissian
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary

 EXECUTIVE: 
  

	
	 /s/ Michael D. Dean

	Michael D. Dean


  
 - 2 -
§ 102-82.10 What are the governing authorities for this part? The authorities for the regulations in this part are: ( a ) 40 U.S.C. 121(c); and
( b ) 40 U.S.C. 501.
PATRICK J. HACKETT 

Of Counsel 

WILLIAM P. CALLAHAN 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

December 17th, 2014 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

515 MADISON AVENUE 

SUITE 2304 

NEW YORK, NY 10022 

212.889.3000 

c_; FAX: 212.889.3242 

E-MAIL: WILLCALL66@GMAIL.COM 

CHINA IPWELL INTERNATIONAL LAW FIRM 

988 DINGXI ROAD 

SHANGHAI CHINA 

(86 21) 6212 5577-8844 

FAX: (86 21) 6212 5089 5618 

Re: Southgate Films, Inc- Petition for 333 Exemption- Request for Confidentiality 

To Whom It May Concern: 

This is a follow-up letter to advise yesterday, this office filed on behalf of our below client, a 

petition for exemption under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. 

The name and address of the applicant is: 

SouthGate Films, Inc. 

President Paul Callahan 

. 67 West Street, Suite 605 

Brooklyn, NY 11222 

Email: paul@southgatefilms.com 

Phone: 347-489-7890 

r\ .. >· 

The following has been submitted via post confidentially to supplement this public'~lectronic 

petition: SouthGate Film's UAS Models/Specs, UAS component manuals, South Gate Film's 

safety manual and certificate of liability insurance. 

In addition, the exhibits enclosed herewith are marked Confidential pursuant to 14 CFR 11.35 

(b) as these manuals contain information proprietary to the applicant which has not and will 

not be shared with others. The manual contains operating conditions and procedures not 

available to the public and are protected from release under 5 USC 552 et.seq of the Freedom 

of Information Act. 

Exhibits Access 

To access the corresponding exhibits for the Section 333 Petition from SouthGate Films, Inc., 

please go to the URL Below: 
If you have any trouble accessing these do~uments, please contact Counsel for SouthGate 

Films, Inc. (Law Offices of William P. Callahan) at 212-889-3000 or via email at 

willcall66@gmail.com 

Thank you for your attention to this enclosure request. 

William P. Callahan, Esq.
3

4

5

1

2

Natoma Manors Bay Heights Golden
Pines

Miami
International
Airport

Morningside

Grapeland
Heights

Coconut
Grove

Little
Havana Dodge
Island

Shenandoah

Virginia


Liberty
City

Silver
Bluff

Little
River

Downtown

Edgewater

The
Roads

Allapattah

Little
Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

Reyes	Plan
Reyes Plan: Areas Moved from District 2 into 3 and 4

Hatching indicates areas of focus. 2013 Plan overlaid in blue lines.

.

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 173-14 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 2 of 2
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-24175-JAL

NIGEL FRANK DE LA TORRE PARDO,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUITY ONE (FLORIDA 

PORTFOLIO) LLC D/B/A BIRD 

LUDLAM, GABLES AH, LLC D/B/A 

CAROLINA ALE HOUSE, WINNDIXIE STORES, INC. D/B/A WINNDIXIE #249 and ORSILLO 

ENTERPRISES INC D/B/A BIRD 

ROAD DAIRY QUEEN,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff, NIGEL FRANK DE LA TORRE PARDO, and Defendant, WINN-DIXIE 

STORES, INC. D/B/A WINN-DIXIE #249, hereby advise the Court that the parties have reached 

an agreement in principle to settle the instant case pending execution of a Settlement Agreement. 

The Parties will file a Stipulation dismissing this Action with prejudice once the settlement 

agreement is executed, which they reasonably expect to do no later than twenty (20) days from the 

date of this Notice. Accordingly, the Parties respectfully request that the Court vacate all currently 

set dates and deadlines in this case as to this Defendant only.

Respectfully submitted this March 30, 2023. 

Case 1:22-cv-24175-JAL Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court 

by using the CM/ECF system. I further certify a copy of the foregoing was sent by CM/ECF to 

all counsel of record on this March 30, 2023.

Respectfully submitted,

 GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

350 Sevilla Avenue, Suite 200

Telephone: (305) 553-3464

Facsimile: (305) 553-3031

Primary E-Mail: ajperez@lawgmp.com

 Secondary E-Mail: bvirues@lawgmp.com; 

dramos@lawgmp.com

By: /s/ Anthony J. Perez____ 

 ANTHONY J. PEREZ

/s/ Anthony J. Perez

ANTHONY J. PEREZ

Florida Bar No. 535451

GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

350 Sevilla Avenue, Suite 200

Coral Gables, Fl 33134

Telephone: (305) 553- 3464

Email: ajperez@lawgmp.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

/s/ Susan V. Warner

SUSAN V. WARNER

Florida Bar No. 38205

FISHERBROYLES LLP

1221 Brickell Avenue, Suite 900

Miami, Florida 33131

Phone: (786) 310-0637

Email: susan.warner@fisherbroyles.com

Attorneys for Defendant WINN-DIXIE 

STORES, INC. D/B/A WINN-DIXIE #249

Case 1:22-cv-24175-JAL Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2023 Page 2 of 2
# Father's Day, 2000

Each year, Americans set aside the third Sunday in June to pay special tribute to our fathers, who for many of us are the first and most important men in our lives. The role of father is a unique blessing and a profound responsibility, one at the very heart of our Nation's families and communities. When we are young, our father's nurturing brings us comfort and security. As we grow, our dads are our teachers and coaches—whether we are learning to read or to play a sport—and they instill in us cherished values of honor, courage, hard work, and respect for others. Later, as adults, we look to our fathers for advice and friendship. On all the paths of life, our fathers encourage us when we hesitate, support us when we falter, and cheer us when we succeed.

American fathers today must balance the demands of work and family. As our growing economy has helped America's families meet their financial needs, the pressure to maintain that balance has increased. For the health of our families, it is important that fathers have the time, the support, and the parenting skills necessary to fulfill their children's moral and emotional needs as well as provide for their physical well-being. Throughout our Administration, Vice President Gore and I have encouraged fathers to take an active and responsible role in their children's lives. This year, in recognition of Father's Day, I am directing the Department of Health and Human Services, along with certain other Federal agencies, to develop guidance for State and local governments, community providers, and families on Federal resources that are available to promote responsible fatherhood.

On this first Father's Day of the 21st century, let us honor our fathers, both living and deceased, for believing in our dreams and helping us to achieve them. Throughout the year, let us continue to reflect on the importance of fathers—whether biological, foster, adoptive, or stepfathers—as role models in our lives. And let us express our gratitude for the many gifts they bring to our lives by passing on their legacy of love and caring to our own children.

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, in accordance with a joint resolution of the Congress approved April 24, 1972 (36 U.S.C. 142a), do hereby proclaim Sunday, June 18, 2000, as Father's Day. I invite the States, communities across our country, and all the citizens of the United States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities that demonstrate our deep appreciation and abiding love for our fathers.                          ( print page 38408)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixteenth day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fourth.

[FR Doc. 00-15861

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 101-25.101-4 Supply through indefinite quantity requirement contracts. The following criteria shall govern in determining whether an item can be most advantageously supplied through the medium of indefinite quantity requirement contracts covering specific periods and providing for delivery to use points as needs arise: ( a ) The item shall be such a character that— ( 1 ) Handling on a storage and issue basis is not economically sound, under the criteria prescribed in § 101-25.101-2;
( 2 ) Rate of use and frequency of ordering at use points is estimated to be sufficient to warrant the making of indefinite quantity requirement contracts;
( 3 ) It is either not feasible to forecast definite requirements for delivery to specific use points (as in the case of new items initially being introduced into a supply system), or no advantage accrues doing so; and
( b ) Industry distribution facilities are adequate properly to serve the use points involved; and
( c ) Conditions exist where any of the following factors requires the maintaining of indefinite quantity requirements contracts— ( 1 ) Advantage to the Government is greater than would be secured by definite quantity procurements by individual offices or agencies (the determining consideration being one of overall economy to the Government, rather than one of direct comparison of unit prices of individual items obtainable through other methods of supply); or no known procurement economies would be effected but the requirements of offices of agencies can best be served by indefinite quantity requirements contracts.
( 2 ) Acute competitive bidding problems exist because of highly technical matters which can best be met on a centralized contracting basis.
( 3 ) The item is proprietary or so complex in design, function, or operation as to be noncompetitive and procurement can best be performed on a centralized contracting basis.
§ 109-1.5300 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart provides identification, accounting, control, and disposal policy guidance for the following categories of high risk personal property: Especially designed or prepared property, export controlled property, nuclear weapon components or weapon-like components, and proliferation sensitive property. The guidance is intended to ensure that the disposition of these categories of high risk personal property does not adversely affect the national security or nuclear nonproliferation objectives of the United States.
( b ) The other categories of high risk personal property are controlled by other life cycle management programs and procedures monitored by other Departmental elements.