alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 751 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 751

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 504 Hamilton Street in Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ``Edward N. 
         Cahn Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1999

  Mr. Toomey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 504 Hamilton Street in Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ``Edward N. 
         Cahn Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 504 Hamilton Street in Allentown, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Edward N. Cahn Federal Building and 
United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``Edward N. Cahn Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 109-38.203 Agency identification.

Standard DOE motor vehicle window decals (DOE Form 1530.1), and door decals to be used only on vehicles without windows (DOE Form 1530.2), are available from the Office of Administrative Services, Logistics Management Division, Headquarters, using DOE Form 4250.2, “Requisition for Supplies, Equipment or Services”, or as directed by that office.
#### In the Matter of Felix V., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[628 NYS2d 520]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Sparrow, J.), dated April 21, 1994, revoking a disposition of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that the appellant had violated the conditions thereof, upon his admission, and placing him with the Division for Youth for a period of 12 months upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated August 16, 1993, made upon the appellant’s admission, finding that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree.

Ordered that the order of disposition is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the violation-of-probation petition is dismissed, and the appellant’s probation is reinstated.

The violation-of-probation petition is jurisdictionally defective because it does not contain nonhearsay allegations supporting each violation of probation with which the appellant was charged *(see,*Family Ct Act § 360.2; *Matter of Neftali D.,*85 NY2d 631).

In view of the foregoing, we decline to review the appellant’s remaining contentions. Mangano, P. J., Joy, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company'samendment to report on Form 10-Q/A amending the quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the Form 10-Q, as amended by thisamendment to report, the "Report") fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

| September 11, 2003 | /s/ Geoffery E. Merszei |
|--------------------|-------------------------|
|                    |                         | Geoffery E. Merszei

Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer |
#### In the Matter of Craig D. Washington, Appellant.

[628 NYS2d 837]

White, J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Clinton County (Lewis, J.), entered August 22, 1994, which dismissed petitioner’s application pursuant to Civil Rights Law article 6 to change his name.

Petitioner, an inmate at Clinton Correctional Facility in Clinton County serving an 81/s to 25-year sentence, petitioned to have his name changed to Youseff Shalom Ali for the reason that the "assumption of a new name will conform to the practice and ideals of’ his Islamic faith. County Court summarily denied the petition on the ground that the name change would result in recordkeeping problems for various State agencies and that petitioner had lost his civil rights to petition for a name change by reason of his felony conviction. This appeal ensued.

The immediate impediment to the appeal is that an ex parte order is not appealable as of right *(see,*CPLR 5701 [a] [2]) and there are no procedural mechanisms petitioner can utilize to produce an appealable order (Siegel, NY Prac § 526, at 817 [2d ed]). To resolve this dilemma, we shall treat the appeal as an application by petitioner for review pursuant to CPLR 5704 (a) *(see, Matter of Michael JJ.,*200 AD2d 80, 82).

Civil Rights Law § 79 (2) now provides that "[a] sentence of imprisonment in a state correctional institution * * * shall not be deemed to suspend the right or capacity of any person so sentenced to commence and prosecute an action or proceeding in any court within this state”. Accordingly, County Court erred in finding that petitioner’s conviction precluded him from making this application *(see, Community Bd. 7 v Schaffer,*84 NY2d 148, 155).

*782Turning to the merits, Civil Rights Law § 63 states in relevant part that "[i]f the court * * * is satisfied * * * that the petition is true, and that there is no reasonable objection to the change of name proposed * * * the court shall make an order authorizing the petitioner to assume the name proposed”. Given this limited power of review, courts ordinarily grant petitions by adults unless there is a demonstrable reason not to do so *(see, Matter of Halligan,*46 AD2d 170, 172).

Although an individual possesses a broad right to assume a new name under common law, in this unique situation involving petitioner who is in the custody of the Department of Correctional Services, which must monitor a large prison population, there may be a reasonable objection to a name change since it could create recordkeeping problems not only for said Department, but also other affected agencies which are required to maintain criminal records. Therefore, since the record has not been adequately developed on this issue, we will remit this matter to County Court for a hearing on notice to the Department of Correctional Services and the Division of Criminal Justice Services.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the County Court of Clinton County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPhysiological and Molecular Genetic Effects of Time-Varying Electromagnetic Fields on Human Neuronal CellsThe present investigation details the development of model systems for growing two- and three-dimensional human neural progenitor cells within a culture medium facilitated by a time-varying electromagnetic field (TVEMF). The cells and culture medium are contained within a two- or three-dimensional culture vessel, and the electromagnetic field is emitted from an electrode or coil. These studies further provide methods to promote neural tissue regeneration by means of culturing the neural cells in either configuration. Grown in two dimensions, neuronal cells extended longitudinally, forming tissue strands extending axially along and within electrodes comprising electrically conductive channels or guides through which a time-varying electrical current was conducted. In the three-dimensional aspect, exposure to TVEMF resulted in the development of three-dimensional aggregates, which emulated organized neural tissues. In both experimental configurations, the proliferation rate of the TVEMF cells was 2.5 to 4.0 times the rate of the non-waveform cells. Each of the experimental embodiments resulted in similar molecular genetic changes regarding the growth potential of the tissues as measured by gene chip analyses, which measured more than 10,000 human genes simultaneously.Document ID20030075722Acquisition SourceJohnson Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsGoodwin, Thomas J.*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 2003Subject CategoryLife Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2003-212054S-906NAS 1.60:212054Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20030075722.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASIDNGTON, D.C.

Sound Aircraft Services, Inc. COMPLAINANT 

### v. Town ofEast Hampton and East Hampton Airport RESPONDENT.

. Docket No. 16-14-07

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced complaint, filed in accordance with 

### FAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-AssistedAirport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CPR Part 16 (Rules ofPractice). Pursuant to the Rules ofPractice, §16.11(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to on or before May 24,2016.



## /')



# ,JA~·· . .... 

# L

**~ .·~<·** 

**,'j!~:H:~** Acting Director, Office ofAirport Compliance

and Management Analysis 

# J):LVJl DateCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 25,2016, I placed in the United States mail (first class, postage paid), a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime addressed to: 

### Counsel to the Complainant Paul A. Lange, Esq. Alison L. Squiccimarro, Esq. Law Offices ofPaul 

### A. Lange, LLC 80 Ferry Boulevard Stratford, CT 06615 pal@lopal.com als@lopal.com 

### Counsel to the Respondent Elizabeth Vail, Esq. Town Attorney Town ofEast Hampton 159 Pantigo Road East Hampton, NY 11937 Mr. James Brundige Airport Manager Town ofEast Hampton Airport 200 Daniels Hole Road Wainscott, NY 11937
Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100

Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
#### § 102-75.245 When can landholding agencies grant rights for non-Federal interim use of excess property reported to GSA?

Landholding agencies, upon approval from GSA, may grant rights for non-Federal interim use of excess property reported to GSA, when it is determined that such excess property is not required for the needs of any Federal agency and when the interim use will not impair the ability to dispose of the property.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen C. Donnelly,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Stephen C. DonnellyChief
      Financial OfficerApril
      14, 2009
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS REPORT

NBS PROJECT MBS REPORT

1002-12-10421 August 28, 1963 8079

Sixteenth Quarterly Progress Report

on the

Mechanisms of Fire Ignition and Extinguishment

by

13 . C. Creitz t

Covering the period 1 14a y 1963 to 31 July 1963

for

Bureau of Ships

Department of the Ravy

Code 638

4T*'

m

SixteenthJJuarterly Progress Report

Mechanisms of Fire Ignition and Extinguishment

by

E. C. Creitz

Covering the period 1 May 19o3 to 31 July 1963

1 . Summary

The mass spectrometer being designed for the study

of electron attachment and ionic processes in flames is

showing satisfactory progress. The new ion source has

shown satisfactory performance on positive ions and, after

considerable experimentation, has produced some negative

ions. A report was written on the velocity modulation

scheme. A theoretical resolution of 1,300 was predicted

for a duty cycle of 75% compared to the presently realizable resolution of 60 at 80% duty cycle.

2. The Mass Spectrometer

The new electron source unit designed and installed

by Mr. Mills resulted in quite satisfactory performance

in producing positive ions. Electron currents of 100

microamperes were easily produced. However, the electron

energies were too high to produce negative ions in any

quantity. An electrostatic screen around the source made

it possible to reduce the electron energies so that, by

using a compound, perfluoryl chloride, known to produce

large quantities of negative ions, it was possible to

detect some negative ions. It will now be possible to

optimize focusing and accelerating potentials to increase

the number of ions subject to analysis.

Theoretical studies directed toward utilization of

velocity modulation indicated that the resolution could

be increased by a factor of about 20 without sacrifice

of duty cycle. While it may not be possible to obtain

saw-tooth voltage generators having the required characteristics, it appears that a practical increase of a

factor of 10 is possible. The velocity modulation approach also offers the advantage that a large part of

the interference caused by overlaping harmonics may be

eliminated. A report has been written covering the

theoretical development of the idea.

USCOMM-NBS-DC
.

•

• •••

. •.

•

.

; i.

'*

-

•- . •

'

.
SCWC-14-0000870 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
ROBERT GRINPAS and ESTHER GRINPAS, Respondent/Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellees,

vs. KAPAA 382, LLC, a Hawai # i Limited Liability Company; KULANA PARTNERS, LLC, a Hawai # i Limited Liability Company; Petitioner/Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant; and WILLIAM R. HANCOCK, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

---------------------------------------------------------------- KULANA PARTNERS, LLC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant,

vs. WILLIAM R. HANCOCK, Trustee of HANCOCK AND CO., INC., PROFIT SHARING TRUST under trust instrument April 3, 1993, Third-Party Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0000870; 5CC071000132) Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000870 21-NOV-2019 09:53 AMORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )

Petitioner Kulana Partners, LLC’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on October 7, 2019, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, November 21, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
#### § 6.5 Minutes of meetings.

The Secretary shall preserve the minutes of Board meetings prepared under § 4.6 of these bylaws. After the minutes of any meeting are approved by the Board, the Secretary shall promptly make available to the public, in the Corporate Communications Department at Postal Service Headquarters, or in another place easily accessible to the public, copies of the minutes, except for those portions which contain information inappropriate for public disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b) or 39 U.S.C. 410(c).
§ 301-72.100 What must my travel accounting system do in relation to common carrier transportation? Your system must: ( a ) Authorize the use of cash in accordance with § 301-51.100 or as otherwise required;
( b ) Correlate travel data accumulated by your authorization and claims accounting systems with common carrier transportation documents and data for audit purposes;
( c ) Identify unused tickets for refund;
( d ) Collect unused, partially used, or downgraded/exchanged tickets, from travelers upon completion of travel;
( e ) Track denied boarding compensation from employees;
( f ) Identify and collect refunds due from carriers for overpayments, or unused, partially used, or downgraded/exchanged tickets; and
( g ) Reconcile all centrally billed travel expenses (e.g., airline, lodging, car rentals, etc.) with travel authorizations and claims to assure that only authorized charges are paid.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2011

- 0909 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2011

-NM

- 027

-AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet


### Inspect 6.0 $ 510.00 

### $0 $ 510.00 

### 668 $340,680.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $340,680 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( U se this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulato ry action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transp ortation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

          - [A-583-827]

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Commerce is extending the time limits of the preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review on static random access memory semiconductors from Taiwan. The review covers five producers/exporters of the subject merchandise to the United States. The period of review is April 1, 1999, through March 31, 2000.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

 June 22, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shawn Thompson at (202) 482-1776 or Irina Itkin at (202) 482-0656, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Because it is not practicable to complete this administrative review within the time limits mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, the Department is extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results until April 30, 2001.

This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(3))A)) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).

Dated: June 16, 2000.

Richard W. Moreland,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-15843  Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
§ 109-38.403-2 Responsibility. The designated contractor will charge the using organization all costs resulting from damage, including vandalism, theft and parking lot damage to a DOE vehicle which occurs during the period that the vehicle is assigned to an employee of that organization. The charges recovered by the designated maintenance operation will be used to repair the vehicle. Other examples for which organizations will be charged are as follows: ( a ) Damage caused by misuse or abuse inconsistent with normal operation and local conditions; or
( b ) Repair costs which are incurred as a result of user's failure to obtain required preventative maintenance; or
( c ) Unauthorized purchases or repairs, including credit card misuse, provided there is a clear, flagrant, and documented pattern of such occurrences.