alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INVESTOR #EO2



                                (logo)TRANSWORLD
                      M 0 R T G A G E    C 0 R P 0 R A T I 0 N
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       FOR
        ANNUAL REPORTING TO NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
                                    (TRUSTEE)
                       EQUIVANTAGE HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST
                                     1995-2


The  undersigned  Officer  certifies  the  following  for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 1995:

(A)      all premiums for each Hazard Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy
         (if applicable) and Primary Mortgage  Insurance Policy (if applicable),
         with respect to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid and that all
         such insurance policies are in full force and effect;

(B)      all real estate taxes,  governmental assessments and any other expenses
         accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance
         on any  Mortgaged  Property,  have been  paid,  or if any such costs or
         expenses have not been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the
         reason for the non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota,
         National Association;

(C)      that  he/she  has  reviewed  the  activities  and  performance  of  the
         Sub-Servicer  during the  preceding  fiscal year under the terms of the
         Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  and to the best of my knowledge,  the
         Sub-Servicer  has  fulfilled  all of its  duties,  responsibilities  or
         obligations under this Agreement  throughout such year, or if there has
         been a default or failure of the  Sub-Servicer  to perform  any of such
         duties,  responsibilities or obligations, a description of each default
         or  failure  and the nature and status  thereof  has been  reported  to
         Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association;

(D)      that  he/she  has  confirmed  that the  Fidelity  Bond,  the Errors and
         Omissions Insurance Policy and any other bonds required under the terms
         of the  Pooling  and  Servicing Agreement are in full force and effect;

(E)      that  the  custodial  P&I and T&I  accounts  have  been  reconciled  in
         accordance  with  the  terms  of  Pooling  and   Servicing   Agreement.



TRANSWORLD MORTGAGE CORPORATION Sub-Servicer for 
     EquiVantage Inc.

Certified By:
/s/Frank D. Feldhaus
Frank D. Feldhaus, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer

4/28/96
Date  

servcert.eol



     13111 NORTHWEST FREEWAY  HOUSTON, TEXAS  77040-6311  (713) 895-6600

                   P.O. BOX 1529  HOUSTON, TEXAS  77210-1529
#### § 102-37.295 Must GSA approve a transfer between SASPs?

Yes, the requesting SASP must submit a SF 123, Transfer Order Surplus Personal Property, to the GSA regional office in which the releasing SASP is located. GSA will approve or disapprove the request within 30 calendar days of receipt of the transfer order.
AFS-11-397-E 

September 13, 2011 

 Exemption No. 9565B 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2007-0061 

Mr. Steven McKnight 

Honeywell International, Inc. 

9201 San Mateo Boulevard, NE. 

Albuquerque, NM 87113 

Dear Mr. McKnight: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 9565, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated July 25, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Honeywell International, Inc. (Honeywell), for an extension of Exemption 

No. 9565, as amended. That exemption from §§ 91.9(b)(2) and 91.203(a) and (b) of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations allows Honeywell to operate an unmanned aircraft system 

(UAS) that does not carry and display the aircraft’s airworthiness, certification, and 

registration documents required in part 91. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Honeywell. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9565, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and 

limitations below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. The documents required under §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the pilot in 

command of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. 

2. Those documents required under § 91.9 or 91.203 must be made available within 10 

days to any FAA, U.S. Department of Defense, or law enforcement official upon 

request. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9565, as amended, to 

November 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
§ 105-56.023 Disposition of amounts collected. ( a ) The disbursing official conducting the offset will transmit amounts collected for debts, less fees charged under § 105-56.022 of this subpart, to GSA.
( b ) If an erroneous offset payment is made to GSA, the disbursing official will notify GSA that an erroneous offset payment has been made. ( 1 ) The disbursing official may deduct the amount of the erroneous offset payment from future amounts payable to GSA; or
( 2 ) Alternatively, upon the disbursing official's request, GSA will promptly return to the disbursing official or the affected payee an amount equal to the amount of the erroneous payment (without regard to whether any other amounts payable to GSA have been paid). ( i ) The disbursing official and GSA will adjust the debtor records appropriately.
( ii ) Unless required by Federal law or contract, refunds under this subpart will not bear interest.
No. 11-9340.

#### Curry *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of Commissioner of Social Services, on Behalf of Gregory H. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected, Respondent, v Geraldine H., Appellant.

[628 NYS2d 797]

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Yancey, J.), dated March 9, 1994, which, upon a finding by the same court on August 11, 1993, that Gregory H. and Keisha H. were neglected children, *inter alia,*placed Gregory H. and Keisha H. with the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review the finding of neglect on August 11, 1993.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner agency met its burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the children Gregory H. and Keisha H. were neglected *(see, Matter of Tammie Z.,*66 NY2d 1). The evidence presented by the agency’s witnesses, including a psychiatrist and a psychologist, established that the mother was unable to adequately care for her children due to her mental and physical disabilities, that the children had suffered physical or emotional harm while in her care in the past, and that they were likely to suffer harm if returned to her care *(see,*Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; *see generally, Matter of Danielle M.,*151 AD2d 240). Moreover, the mother’s contention with respect to the neglect finding as to her youngest child, Beajay, is academic. The mother’s parental rights to Beajay were terminated in a subsequent proceeding, and her appeal from that determination was dismissed.

The mother contends that the order of disposition was improper insofar as it placed the older children, Gregory and Keisha, with the petitioner agency for a period of one year. At the dispositional hearing, the mother conceded that she might not be able to care for Beajay but requested the immediate return of the two older children. We find no basis on this record to disturb the Family Court’s determination that, even if certain supportive services were provided to the mother, the children would be at risk of harm if returned to her care. Al*561though the order of placement has expired, we note that a proceeding to extend placement is pending. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.
#### § 109-50.104 Equipment which may be granted.

Generally, equipment items classified in FSCG 66, Instruments and Laboratory Equipment, are eligible for granting under this program. Other selected items designated by the Office of Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) and approved by the OPMO, are made available under the program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000005227
<NAME> AMERICAN INDEMNITY FINANCIAL CORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        73,862,163
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  11,887,681
<MORTGAGE>                                      20,980
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              85,820,824
<CASH>                                       4,001,710
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          13,038,618
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       9,555,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,499,945
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             52,256,326
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         36,824,032
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                535,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,497,018
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,460,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               141,499,945
<PREMIUMS>                                  49,644,191
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          3,411,671
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             648,917
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 548,352
<BENEFITS>                                  35,526,326
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        18,163,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                595,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            595,746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   595,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Case 9:22-cv-81923-AMC Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

2 P.M., Thursday, June 29, 2000. 

# PLACE: 

Board Room, Second Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board 1777 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. 

# STATUS: 

The entire meeting will be open to the public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED DURING PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:

  
      - Final Rule: Federal Home Loan Bank Acquired Member Assets, Core Mission Activities, Investments and Advances.
      - Final Rule: Amendments to Advances and Other Regulations to Implement Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Collateral Provisions and Make Related Revisions.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the Board, (202) 408-2837. 

William W. Ginsberg,

Managing Director.

[FR Doc. 00-16010 Filed 6-20-00; 4:59 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23
----------

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
The Ashton Technology Group, Inc.


We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(No's. 333-95717 and 333-95735) on Forms S-8 of our report dated April 27, 2000
related to the balance sheets of The Ashton Technology Group, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended March 31, 2000, which report appears in the
March 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of the Ashton Technology Group, Inc.

/s/ Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP
-------------------------------

GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York

June 26, 2000
No. 11-1185.

#### Sibley *v.*United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioner to expedite consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     of the

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       of

                     PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED

               Duly Adopted in Accordance with Section 242 of the
                        Delaware General Corporation Law

               PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES,  INCORPORATED,  a corporation organized
and existing under and by virtue of the General  Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the "Corporation"),

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

I.       The  present  name  of the  Corporation  is  Performance  Technologies,
         Incorporated and the date of the filing of the original  Certificate of
         Incorporation  with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware was
         the 20th day of February, 1981.

II.      The restated  Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
         amended  by the  following  resolution  of the Board of  Directors  and
         Shareholders of the Corporation:

                  RESOLVED,  that the restated  Certificate of  Incorporation of
                  the  Corporation be, and it hereby is, amended to increase the
                  number of authorized  shares by deleting  paragraph  FOURTH of
                  the Restated  Certificate of Incorporation in its entirety and
                  substituting in lieu thereof the following:

                           FOURTH:  The amount of total authorized capital stock
                  of the  Corporation is divided into  50,000,000  common shares
                  with a par value of one cent  ($.01)  per share and  1,000,000
                  shares of Preferred  Stock with a par value of one cent ($.01)
                  as provided by Article "TENTH".

III.     That the amendment of the Restated  Certificate of Incorporation herein
         certified  has  been  duly  adopted  by the  vote of the  holders  of a
         majority  of  shares  of the  Corporation's  common  stock at a Special
         Meeting held on February 9, 2000, in accordance  with the provisions of
         Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IV.     That the capital of the Corporation  shall not  be  reduced  under or by
        reason of said amendment

               IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Corporation has caused this Certificate
of Amendment to be signed by Donald L. Turrell,  its Chief Executive Officer and
President,  and  Kenneth  R.  Donaldson,  its  Secretary,  as of the  9th day of
February, 2000 and they each hereby affirm the truth of the statements contained
herein under penalties of perjury.

                               /s/Donald L. Turrell
                              --------------------
                               Donald L. Turrell,
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                  and President

                            /s/Kenneth R. Donnaldson
                            ------------------------
                              Kenneth R. Donaldson,
                                    Secretary
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 11, 2020

No. 04-20-00244-CR, 04-20-00245-CR, 04-20-00246-CR, 04-20-00247-CR, 04-20-00248-CR, 04-20-

00249-CR, 04-20-00250-CR, 04-20-00251-CR, 04-20-00252-CR, 04-20-00253-CR, 04-20-00254-CR, 

04-20-00255-CR, 04-20-00256-CR, 04-20-00257-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

David Daniel ROBLES, ET AL

Appellees

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10007CR, 10164CR, 10156CR, 10165CR, 10176CR, 10182CR, 

10205CR, 10209CR, 10226CR, 10231CR, 10236CR, 10237CR, 10238CR, 10239CR 

Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s records in these appeals have been filed and appellant’s briefs are due 

September 30, 2020. On September 8, 2020, appellant filed, in each case, a motion to 

consolidate these appeals for the purposes of motions, orders, briefing, oral argument, decision, 

and opinion.

The motion is GRANTED IN PART and it is ORDERED that the appeals shall be 

consolidated for motions, briefing, and argument purposes only. The parties shall file motions, 

briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one appeal, but shall include the table of cases 

that appears on page two of appellant’s motion to consolidate, referencing all appeal and trial 

court cause numbers in the style of the filing.

The court will dispose of the appeals with separate judgments, opinions, and mandates 

except to the extent the appeals involve the same defendant.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of September, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### § 105-8.170-1 Applicability.

Except as provided in § 105-8.170-2, §§ 105-8.170 through 105-8.170-13 apply to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
#### § 105-68.600 How do suspension and debarment actions start?

When we receive information from any source concerning a cause for suspension or debarment, we will promptly report and investigate it. We refer the question of whether to suspend or debar you to our suspending or debarring official for consideration, if appropriate.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4975 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4975

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
To designate the post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal Square, 
    Newark, New Jersey, as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg Post Office and 
                              Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal Square, Newark, 
New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg 
Post Office and Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the post office and courthouse referred 
to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frank R. 
Lautenberg Post Office and Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Opinion issued September 26, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NOS. 01-13-00418-CR & 01-13-00419-CR

———————————

IN RE GLEN TATE, Relator

Original Proceedings on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Glen Tate filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to 

compel the trial court to rule on his “Motion for the Production of the Court 
2

Reporter’s Records” from the first trial of his offenses, conducted in the 179th 

District Court, which ended in a mistrial.1

Before we may grant such relief, a relator must establish that the trial court 

had a legal duty to rule on the motion, the court received and was asked to rule on 

the motion, and the court failed to do so. In re Keeter, 134 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex. 

App.—Waco 2003, orig. proceeding). Tate has not established these elements.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. Any pending motions are 

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

1

The underlying proceedings are State of Texas v. Tate, Nos. 1309786 & 1309787 

(209th District Court, Harris County, Texas), the Honorable Michael McSpadden

presiding.