alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 122 (Friday, June 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39122-39123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed additions to Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee has received proposals to add to the Procurement 
List services to be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons 
who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED ON OR BEFORE:  July 24, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louis R. Bartalot (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 47(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested 
persons an opportunity to submit comments on the possible impact of the 
proposed actions.
    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, all entities of 
the Federal Government (except as otherwise indicated) will be required 
to procure the services listed below from nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities. I certify that 
the following action will not have a significant impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. The major factors considered for 
this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the services to the 
Government.
    2. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the services to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the services proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List. Comments on this certification are invited. 
Commenters should identify the statement(s) underlying the 
certification on which they are providing additional information.
    The following services have been proposed for addition to 
Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed:

Grounds Maintenance

Little Rock Air Force Base, Arkansas
NPA: Trace, Inc., Eagle, Idaho

Mail and Messenger Service

National Institute of Health
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland

[[Page 39123]]

NPA: Fairfax Opportunities Unlimited, Inc., Alexandria, Virginia

Louis R. Bartalot,
Deputy Director (Operations).
[FR Doc. 00-15930 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000006207
<NAME>                                             AMREP CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                                         U.S.DOLLARS
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       JAN-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                   0
<CASH>                                                        6,952
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                54,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                 101,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  0
<PP&E>                                                       31,247
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (13,050)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              200,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             0
<BONDS>                                                      77,838
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                        740
<OTHER-SE>                                                   68,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                200,712
<SALES>                                                      58,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            104,399
<CGS>                                                        46,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                85,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            3,005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               1,553
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    621
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             932
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    932
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0
        
 

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUSSAERO version D computer program development using ANSI standard FORTRAN 77 and DI-3000 graphicsThe D version of the Unified Subsonic Supersonic Aerodynamic Analysis (USSAERO) program is the result of numerous modifications and enhancements to the B01 version. These changes include conversion to ANSI standard FORTRAN 77; use of the DI-3000 graphics package; removal of the overlay structure; a revised input format; the addition of an input data analysis routine; and increasing the number of aeronautical components allowed.Document ID19860015189Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWiese, M. R.*(Computer Sciences Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1986Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:3980NASA-CR-3980Accession Number86N24660Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-17999PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-71-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860015189.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
248P15

#### Paul Frampton v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

1. Respondent-Defendant’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1117)

1. Denied

2. Petitioner-Plaintiffs Conditional PDR under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Dismissed as moot
No. 10-10947.

#### Fuentes-Majano *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5412 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5412

 To amend the Social Security Act to eliminate the five-month waiting 
  period in the disability insurance program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2000

 Mr. Deal of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Social Security Act to eliminate the five-month waiting 
  period in the disability insurance program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Act Improvements for 
the Terminally Ill Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF TITLE II WAITING PERIOD FOR TERMINALLY ILL 
              INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 223(a) of the Social Security Act is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``he meets the 
        requirements of paragraph (3), or'' after ``but only if''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3)(A) For purposes of paragraph (1), an individual meets the 
requirements of this paragraph if--
            ``(i) the impairment underlying a finding that the 
        individual is under a disability results in his death prior to 
        the end of the applicable period described in subparagraph (B), 
        or
            ``(ii)(I) in the case where such finding is made before the 
        end of the applicable period, the Commissioner determines that, 
        at the time such finding is made, such impairment is expected 
        to result in the individual's death prior to the end of such 
        period, or
            ``(II) in the case where such finding is made after the end 
        of the applicable period, the Commissioner determines that, at 
        any time during such period, such impairment was expected to 
        result in the individual's death prior to the end of such 
        period.
    ``(B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A), the `applicable period' 
is the period of the first six consecutive calendar months throughout 
which such individual is under a disability by reason of such 
impairment which begins not earlier than the first day of the period 
described in subsection (c)(2)(B).''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect with respect to 
applications filed after September 30, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 301-52.24 Does mandatory use of the Government contractor-issued travel charge card change my obligation to pay my travel card bill by the due date?

No, mandatory use of the Government contractor-issued travel charge card does not relieve you of your obligation to pay your bill in accordance with your cardholder agreement.

[FTR Amdt. 90, 65 FR 3056, Jan. 19, 2000]
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 216-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 965.8 Hearings. ( a ) Generally, mail dispute cases are resolved based on written submissions. However, in the discretion of the presiding officer an oral hearing may be conducted where in the opinion of the presiding officer, the case cannot be resolved by a review of the documentary evidence.
( b ) Hearings are held at 2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22201-3078, or such other place as may be designated by the presiding officer.
[52 FR 29012, Aug. 5, 1987, as amended at 63 FR 66053, Dec. 1, 1998; 76 FR 15219, Mar. 21, 2011]
341A15

#### Julie Lancaster and Brannon Lancaster v. Harold K. Jordan and Co., Inc., Withers & Ravenel, Inc., Arthur R. Cogswell, and Lighthouse Engineering, PA

1. Pits’ Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-35)

1.-

2. Def’s (Harold K. Jordan and Co., Inc.) Motion to Dismiss Appeal

2. Allowed
#### § 301-72.201 What must we do if an employee uses cash in excess of the $100 limit to purchase common carrier transportation?

To justify the use of cash in excess of $100, both the agency and traveler must certify on the travel claim the necessity for such use. See 41 CFR 101-41.203-2.
§ 302-17.5 Who is eligible for the WTA and the RITA? The withholding tax allowance (WTA) and the relocation income tax allowance (RITA) are the two allowances through which the Government reimburses you for substantially all of the income taxes that you incur as a result of your relocation. You are eligible for the WTA and the RITA if you are relocating in the interest of the Government, and your agency's reimbursements to you for relocation expenses result in you being liable for additional income taxes. Eligibility for WTA and RITA includes, among others, transferred employees, appointments (new or political), assignments under the Government Employees Training Act, and those returning from an overseas assignment for the purpose of separation from Government service. Note to § 302-17.5 :
If your agency offers you the choice, the WTA is optional to you. See 302-17.61 through 302-17.69.
[FTR Amdt. 2014-01, 79 FR 49645, Aug. 21, 2014, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2020-02, 84 FR 64782, Nov. 25, 2019; 86 FR 73684, Dec. 28, 2021]
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 865

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a special rule

for members of the uniformed services and the Foreign Service in determining the exclusion of gain from the sale of a principal residence.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Mr. HOUGHTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

a special rule for members of the uniformed services

and the Foreign Service in determining the exclusion

of gain from the sale of a principal residence.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULE FOR MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED

4 SERVICES AND FOREIGN SERVICE IN DETER5 MINING EXCLUSION OF GAIN FROM SALE OF

6 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 121 of

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exclusion
2

•HR 865 IH

1 of gain from sale of principal residence) is amended by

2 adding at the end the following new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(9) MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED SERVICES AND

4 FOREIGN SERVICE.—

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The running of the 5-

6 year period described in subsection (a) shall be

7 suspended with respect to an individual during

8 any time that such individual or such individ9 ual’s spouse is serving on qualified official ex10 tended duty as a member of the uniformed

11 services or of the Foreign Service.

12 ‘‘(B) QUALIFIED OFFICIAL EXTENDED

13 DUTY.—For purposes of this paragraph—

14 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘quali15 fied official extended duty’ means any pe16 riod of extended duty as a member of the

17 uniformed services or a member of the

18 Foreign Service during which the member

19 serves at a duty station which is at least

20 50 miles from such property or is under

21 Government orders to reside in Govern22 ment quarters.

23 ‘‘(ii) UNIFORMED SERVICES.—The

24 term ‘uniformed services’ has the meaning

25 given such term by section 101(a)(5) of
3

•HR 865 IH

1 title 10, United States Code, as in effect

2 on the date of the enactment of this para3 graph.

4 ‘‘(iii) FOREIGN SERVICE OF THE

5 UNITED STATES.—The term ‘member of

6 the Foreign Service’ has the meaning given

7 the term ‘member of the Service’ by para8 graph (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) of section

9 103 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980, as

10 in effect on the date of the enactment of

11 this paragraph.

12 ‘‘(iv) EXTENDED DUTY.—The term

13 ‘extended duty’ means any period of active

14 duty pursuant to a call or order to such

15 duty for a period in excess of 90 days or

16 for an indefinite period.’’.

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

18 this section shall apply to sales and exchanges after May

19 6, 1997.

Æ
#### Louis C. Sharp et al. v. Charles Johnson et al.

Filed March 5, 1895.

No. 4985.

Replevin: Evidence of Ownership: Pleading. An allegation-of general ownership in an action of replevin is not supported by-proof of a mere lien or olher special ownership. *{Musser v.*King, 40 Neb., 892; *Randall r. 1 erss*is, 42 Neb., 607.)

Error from the district our of Cuming county. Tried below before Norris, J.

*M. McLaughlin*and *J. C. Crawford,*for plaintiffs in-error.

*T. M. Franse, contra.*

Post, J.

This was an action of replevin in the district court for Cuming county, the subject of the controversy being a field of corn levied upon by Sharp, one of the plaintiffs in error, to satisfy an execution against John Windell, and in favor of George Rowberg. The defendants in error thereupon instituted this action for the recovery of the property described, and were permitted to recover in the district court} *166•when the cause was removed into this court for review upon the petition in error of the sheriff.

Numerous errors are alleged, of which we shall notice but one, and which is presented by different assignments of the motion for a new trial, and the petition in error, viz., the admission in evidence of Exhibit A, being the instrument upon which defendants in error base their claim of title to the property in dispute. For a perfect understanding of the question under consideration, it is necessary to refer to the pleadings, which consist of an allegation of general ownership on the part of the plaintiff below, and a general denial by the defendant. The instrument offered in evidence, although denominated a “bill of sale,” appears from jts face to have been intended as security for an indebtedness due from Winded to the plaintiffs below. We have presented, therefore, the question, does proof of a mere lien or other special interest, in au action of replevin, sustain an allegation of general ownership? The precise question was presented in *Musser v. King,*40 Neb., 892, and was there resolved in the negative, and which was followed in *Randall v. Persons,*42 Neb., 607. And in view of the careful examination by Commissioner Ragan of the question therein presented, a further examination of the subject at this time would be entirely superfluous. It follows that the ruling assigned is error, for which the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings in the district court.

Reversed and remanded.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00313-CR

Mario Chapa a/k/a Mario Chapa Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-CR-0568-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 30, 2022
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Childtime Learning Centers, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-38325
and 33-33741) of our report dated June 8, 1998 on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of
Childtime Learning Centers, Inc. and Subsidiary as of April 3, 1998 and March
28, 1997 and for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended April 3,
1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Coopers & Lybrand, LLP
Detroit, Michigan
June 30, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15650]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3338]


Passport Services, Office of Field Operations, Field Coordination 
Division; Proposed Information Collection

AGENCY: Department of State

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection; Statement of 
Nonreceipt of Passport, DSP-86.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Originating Office: Bureau of Consular Affairs, CA/PPT/FO/FC.
    Title of Information Collection: Statement of Nonreceipt of 
Passport.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Form Number: DSP-86.
    Respondents: Customers who have not received the passports for 
which they originally applied.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 18,000/year.
    Average Hours Per Response: 5 minutes (\1/12\hr).
    Total Estimated Burden: 1,500 hours/year.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to:
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Public comments, or requests for additional 
information, regarding the collection listed in this notice should be 
directed to R. Michael Holly, U.S. Department Of State, Bureau of 
Consular Affairs, SA-1, Room H904, 2401 E. Street, NW Washington, DC. 
20522-0111. 202-663-2460.

    Dated: May 18, 2000.
George C. Lannon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Passport Services, U.S. Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 00-15650 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P
#### § 109-1.5108-4 Precious metals.

Perpetual inventory records are to be maintained for precious metals.
# Comments on: 20-1709: NORTH 61 LLC v. SJOKLAEDAGERDIN HF. [OPINION], Nonprecedential
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05126

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05126\05126_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05126\05126_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05126\05126_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05126\05126_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05126\05126_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05126\05126_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05126\05126_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05126\Supporting Documents\05126_ BLOCK DIAGRAM.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05126\Supporting Documents\05126_ Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05126\Supporting Documents\05126_Follow Up Questions.doc Follow-up questions regarding survey contents.

x 05126\05126_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05126\05126_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.