alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

Calendar No. 613

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 643

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 13, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

JUNE 21, 2000

Reported by Mr. THOMPSON, without amendment

AN ACT

To redesignate the Federal building located at 10301 South

Compton Avenue, in Los Angeles, California, and known

as the Watts Finance Office, as the ‘‘Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 10301 South Comp5 ton Avenue, in Los Angeles, California, and known as the

6 Watts Finance Office, shall be known and designated as

7 the ‘‘Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office Building’’.
2

•HR 643 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office

6 Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 12,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 613

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 643

AN ACT

To redesignate the Federal building located at

10301 South Compton Avenue, in Los Angeles,California, and known as the Watts Finance Office, as the ‘‘Augustus F. Hawkins Post OfficeBuilding’’.

JUNE 21, 2000

Reported without amendment
§ 302-11.7 When are expenses for my settlement of an unexpired lease reimbursable? When your unexpired lease (including month to month) is for residence quarters at your old official station, you may be reimbursed for settlement expenses for an unexpired lease, including but not limited to broker's fees for obtaining a sublease or charges for advertising if: ( a ) Applicable laws or the terms of the lease provide for payment of settlement expenses; or
( b ) Such expenses cannot be avoided by sublease or other arrangement; or
( c ) You have not contributed to the expenses by failing to give appropriate lease termination notice promptly after you have definite knowledge of your transfer; or
( d ) The broker's fees or advertising charges are not in excess of those customarily charged for comparable services in that locality.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ending November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dinesh R. Desai,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Dinesh R. DesaiChief
      Executive OfficerJanuary
      14, 2010
#### In the MATTER OF the PETITION OF Gregory K. TRENTON, III for A Writ of Mandamus.1

No. 401, 2016

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: August 23, 2016

Decided: September 8, 2016

1

. The Court previously assigned a pseudonym to the petitioner under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).

DISMISSED.
No. 10-11126.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, William L.
Walton, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ William L. WaltonName:
    William L. WaltonDate: November 5, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 0:22-cv-62336

JONATHAN HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FLOKEL ENTERPRISES INC. 

AND RONAN GIDEKEL,

Defendants.

______________________________/

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION 

 

TO: RONAN GIDEKEL

3428 NE 210 LN

AVENTURA, FL 33180

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 

days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States 

described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached 

complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must 

be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, whose name and address are:

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: (305) 230-4884

brian@fairlawattorney.com

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in 

the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

____________________________

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 0:22-cv-62336-XXXX Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/14/2022 Page 1 of 3
Case 0:22-cv-62336-XXXX Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/14/2022 Page 2 of 3
Civil Action No.:

PROOF OF SERVICE 

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l)) 

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)_______________________________________________was 

received by me on (date) .

␣ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) ______________________________ 

_______________________________, on (date)_____________________; or 

␣ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name) _____________ 

____________________________________________________, a person of suitable age and discretion 

who resides there, on (date) , and 

mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

␣ I served the summons on (name of individual)___________________________________________________

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) _________________ 

____________________________________________on (date) _____________________________; or

␣ I returned the summons unexecuted because _______________________________________; or

␣ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $_________for travel and $____________for services, for a total of $___________

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:______________ _______________________________________

Server’s Signature

_______________________________________

Printed Name and Title

_______________________________________

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 0:22-cv-62336-XXXX Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/14/2022 Page 3 of 3
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3847]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

National Coal Council

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the National Coal Council 
(NCC). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 
770) requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Friday, March 18, 2011 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Westin Georgetown, 2350 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Ducker, U.S. Department of 
Energy; 4G-036/Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20585-1290; Telephone: (202) 586-7810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of Meeting: To conduct an open meeting of the NCC and to 
provide a presentation on the new study conducted by the Council on the 
deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies.
    Agenda:
     Welcome and call to order by NCC Chair Joe Hopf.
     Remarks by Secretary Steven Chu, Department of Energy.
     Council Business:
    [cir] Finance report by Committee Chairman Joe Hopf.
     Presentation by Coal Policy Committee Chairman Frank Blake 
on the findings and recommendations in the new NCC Report.
     Presentation by Mike Howard, President and CEO of Electric 
Power Research Institute (EPRI).
     Presentation by Tom Grahame of the Department of Energy on 
the impacts of black carbon in the atmosphere.
     Other Business.
     Adjourn.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any potential items on the agenda, you should 
contact Michael J. Ducker by telephone at (202) 586-7810 or 
Michael.Ducker@HQ.DOE.GOV (e-mail). You must make your request for an 
oral statement at least 5 business days before the meeting. Reasonable 
provision will be made to include the scheduled oral statements on the 
agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will conduct the meeting to 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Public comment will follow 
the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The NCC will prepare meeting minutes within 45 days of the 
meeting. The minutes will be posted on the NCC Web site at http://www.nationalcoalcouncil.org/.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on February 15, 2011.
LaTanya Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-3847 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
No. 10-10974.

#### Brown *v.*Cortez Masto, Attorney General of Nevada, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.3








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Sean M. Healey, certify that:





|   |                                                                                          
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







Date: March 31, 2017





/s/ SEAN M. HEALEYSean M. HealeyChief Executive Officer and Chairman
No. 10-10951.

#### Gooch *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 22-10023-CR-GAYLES/SNOW 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

WENDY C. KILHEFFER, 

Defendant. 

I --------------

JOINT FACTUAL STATEMENT 

The United States of America and WENDY C. KILHEFFER stipulate and agree that if this 

matter were to proceed to trial, the United States, by photographs, documentary evidence and the 

testimony of witnesses, would establish the following: 

1. The Endangered Species Act, Title 16, United States Code, Section 1538(a)(l(B), 

with respect to any species of wildlife listed pursuant to section 1533 of the Act, and subject to 

certain exceptions not applicable herein, makes it unlawful for any person subject to the 

jurisdiction of the United States to take any such species within the United States. For purposes of 

the Act and the regulations issued thereunder, the term "take" includes harming, shooting, 

wounding, or killing such species, or attempting to engage in any such conduct. Title 16, United 

States Code, Section 1532(19). 

2. The Key deer (Odocoileus virginianus clavium), is an endangered species listed 

pursuant to the Endangered Species Act. 

3. On or about November 16, 2022, at Big Pine Key, Monroe County, in the Southern 

District of Florida, knowingly and unlawfully took a Key deer by shooting, harming, and killing 

said Key deer with a handgun. 

Case 4:22-cr-10023-DPG Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2023 Page 1 of 2
Conclusion 

Based upon the foregoing, the United States and defendant respectfully submit that a 

reasonable jury would find that WENDY C. KlLHEFFER is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of 

knowingly and unlawfully taking a Key deer (Odocoileus virginianus clavium), an endangered 

species listed pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, by shooting, harming, and killing said Key 

deer, in violation of Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 17.21(c)(l) and Title 16, United 

States code, Sections 1538(a)(l)(B) and 1540(b)(l) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2, 

as specified in the single Count of the Information filed against her. 

Date: 01 /o,/m2iJ 

Respectfully submitted, 

MARKENZY LAPOINTE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

By: 

, ssistant States Attorney 

By: DAl?ri~ 

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 

By: 

DEFEN 

2 

Case 4:22-cr-10023-DPG Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 128-1.5003 Primary authority and responsibility. ( a ) The Attorney General of the United States has the primary authority and responsibility for providing direction, leadership, and general supervision in the development and administration of an effective and efficient supply support system for the Department, to include: ( 1 ) The establishment of Department-wide policies, directions, regulations, and procedures satisfying the requirements of law, regulations, and sound management practice; and
( 2 ) The review, evaluation, and improvement of personal property management programs, functions, operations, and procedures throughout the Department.
( b ) Pursuant to 28 CFR 0.75 and subject to the general supervision of the Attorney General and the direction of the Deputy Attorney General, the functions described above are assigned to the Assistant Attorney General for Administration as delegations of authority.
No. 10-10971.

#### Summers *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

EXHIBIT

“A”

EXHIBIT “A”

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 86-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/27/2023 Page 1 of 33
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-cv-24118-BB

WINDY LUCIUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SUSHI BY BOU GLOBAL, LLC.,

d/b/a Sushi by Bou,

Defendant

_________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

COMES NOW Plaintiff, WINDY LUCIUS, by and through the undersigned counsel, and 

pursuant to Rule 41(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., hereby gives notice that she voluntarily dismisses this 

action, with prejudice against Defendant, SUSHI BY BOU GLOBAL, LLC., d/b/a Sushi by Bou, 

and respectfully requests this Court to terminate the action.

Respectfully submitted on this February 24, 2023. 

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

FBN: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Case 1:22-cv-24118-BB Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023 Page 1 of 2
Lucius v. Sushi by Bou Global LLC.

Case No. 22-cv-24118-BB

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 24, 2023, an electronic copy of the foregoing 

document was filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notice of 

electronic filing to all parties and Counsel of record. 

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

FBN: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-24118-BB Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-81083-Civ-Cannon/Reinhart

CRAIG ZOBEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AND TO ADJUST SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES (ECF NO. 13)

THIS CASE is before this Court upon Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion For 

Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment and to Adjust Scheduling

Order Deadlines (“Motion”). ECF No. 13. It is hereby ORDERED:

(1) The Motion is GRANTED;

(2) Plaintiff shall file his motion for summary judgment on or before thirty (30)

days from the date of this Order;

(3) Defendant shall file its response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary 

judgment and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment within thirty

(30) days after Plaintiff files his motion for summary judgment.

Case 9:22-cv-81083-AMC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

(4) Plaintiff may respond to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and 

reply to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days 

after Defendant files its response and motion as set forth above.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach in the Southern 

District of Florida, this 6th day of December, 2022.

BRUCE E. REINHART

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 9:22-cv-81083-AMC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2022 Page 2 of 2
# Comments on: 2019-1149: Cardionet, LLC v. InfoBionic, Inc
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TARUS MACK

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2939

LT Case No. 2020

- CA

- 3701

- O

MARLIN DANIELS AND THE ORANGE

COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD

,

Appellee s

. ________________________________/

Decision filed October 4, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit

Court for O range County

, Kevin B. Weiss , Judge.

Matthew A. Leibert, of Law Office Matthew

A. Leibert, Orlando, for Appellant.

Nicholas A. Shannin, of Shannin Law Firm,

P

. A

. , Orlando, for Appellee , T he Orange County C anvassing B oard

.

Christian W. Waugh, of Waugh Grant PLLC,

Orlando , for Appellee, Marlin Daniels.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER , COHEN and EDWARDS , JJ., concur.
§ 105-68.50 How is this part written? ( a ) This part uses a “plain language” format to make it easier for the general public and business community to use. The section headings and text, often in the form of questions and answers, must be read together.
( b ) Pronouns used within this part, such as “I” and “you,” change from subpart to subpart depending on the audience being addressed. The pronoun “we” always is the General Services Administration.
( c ) The “Covered Transactions” diagram in the appendix to this part shows the levels or “tiers” at which the General Services Administration enforces an exclusion under this part.
Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.21 of Part 101-6
Editorial Note: For additional information, see related documents published at 47 FR 57369, Dec. 23, 1982, 48 FR 17101, Apr. 21, 1983, and 48 FR 29096, June 24, 1983.

§ 101-6.2112 How may a State simplify, consolidate, or substitute federally required State plans? ( a ) As used in this section: ( 1 ) *Simplify* means that a State may develop its own format, choose its own submission date, and select the planning period for a State plan.
( 2 ) *Consolidate* means that a State may meet statutory and regulatory requirements by combining two or more plans into one document and that the State can select the format, submission date, and planning period for the consolidated plan.
( 3 ) *Substitute* means that a State may use a plan or other document that it has developed for its own purposes to meet Federal requirements.
( b ) If not inconsistent with law, a State may decide to try to simplify, consolidate, or substitute federally required State plans without prior approval by the Administrator.
( c ) The Administrator reviews each State plan that a State has simplified, consolidated, or substituted and accepts the plan only if its contents meet Federal requirements.
§ 301-73.104 May further exceptions to the required use of the E-Gov Travel Service be approved? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77028 , Sept. 20, 2024.
( a ) The Administrator of General Services or the Administrator's designee may grant an agency-wide exception (or exempt a component thereof) from the required use of ETS when requested by the head of a Department (cabinet-level agency) or head of an Independent agency when— ( 1 ) The agency has presented a business case analysis to the General Services Administration that proves that it has an alternative TMS to the ETS that is in the best interest of the Government and the taxpayer (*i.e.,* the agency has evaluated the economic and service values offered by the ETS contractor(s) compared to those offered by the agency's current Travel Management Service (TMS) and has determined that the agency's current TMS is a better value);
( 2 ) The agency has security, secrecy, or protection of information issues that cannot be mitigated through security provided by the ETS contractors;
( 3 ) The agency lacks the technology necessary to access ETS; or
( 4 ) The agency has critical and unique technology or business requirements that cannot be accommodated by the ETS contractors at all or at an acceptable and reasonable price (e.g., majority of travel is group-travel).
( b ) As a condition of receiving an exception, the agency must agree to conduct annual business case reviews of its TMS and must provide to the eTravel PMO data elements required by the eTravel PMO in a format prescribed by the eTravel PMO.
( c ) Requests for exceptions should be sent to the Administrator, General Services Administration, 1800 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20405 with full justification and/or analysis addressing paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), or (a)(4) of this section.
[FTR Amdt. 2003-07, 68 FR 71030, Dec. 22, 2003, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61540, Oct. 31, 2007; FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12253, Feb. 16, 2024]