alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10019

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE ONTIVEROS-SOTO,

also known as Jorge Onteberos Soto,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CR-146-1-X

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Ontiveros-Soto appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Ontiveros-Soto

contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define

separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been

alleged in his indictment and included in the factual basis of
No. 02-10019

-2-

his guilty plea. Ontiveros-Soto maintains that he pleaded guilty

to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year

maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that

offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Ontiveros-Soto acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

In lieu of filing an appellee’s brief, the Government has

filed a motion asking this court to dismiss this appeal or, in

the alternative, to summarily affirm the district court’s

judgment. The Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. The

motion for a summary affirmance is GRANTED. The Government need

not file an appellee’s brief. 
No. 02-10019

-3-

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED; MOTION FOR SUMMARY

AFFIRMANCE GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15525]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Allegheny-Singer Research Institute; Notice of Decision on 
Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 00-013. Applicant: Allegheny-Singer Research 
Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212-4772. Instrument: Robot and Microplate 
Manipulator, Model Q-Bot. Manufacturer: Genetix Limited, United 
Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 65 FR 26583, May 8, 2000.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides a unique multi-
tasking robotic system for the production, gridding and regridding of 
DNA arrays with: (1) A pneumatic picking head for sampling 3500 
colonies per hour, (2) ability to create high density arrays on nylon 
filters, (3) replication of plates (96 or 384 wells) for distributing 
clones and (4) picking of both colonies or plaques. The National 
Institutes of Health advised in its memorandum of May 5, 2000 that (1) 
these capabilities are pertinent to the applicant's intended purpose 
and (2) it knows of no domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument for the applicant's intended 
use.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.

Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 00-15525 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
## Devany , Denni s (OST) From : Samuel , Kathlee n A
. [Kathleen.Samuel@alcoa.com ] Sent : Wednesday , Septembe r15 , 201 0 3:4 9 P M To : EA S (OST ) Subject : Cap e Ai rServic e - Massen a N Y Mr
. Denni s DeVan y D.O.T
. Chief , EA

S & Domesti cAnalysi s Divisio n U.S
. Departmen t o fTransportatio n ~~ ' 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E " Q Washington , D

C 2059 0
_ tS JG O Mr
. DeVany , <- ^ A s a tw/ic e monthl ytraveler , I hav e ha d th e pleasur e o futilizin g Cap e Ai rfligh tservic e betwee n Massen a an d Albany often
. Thei rservic e an d reliabilit yi s superior , a s i s thei rattentivenes s t o safety , custome rneed s an d suppor to fth e communitie s i n whic h the yoperate . I understan d tha t th e Tow n o fMassen a has vote d t o chang e carrier s t o a bankrup tcarrie rwit h servic e throug h Bosto n utilizin g a large raircraft
. T o me , thi s arrangemen tdoe s no tmak e goo d busines s sense . Whe n I fl you to fMassen a m y fello wpassengers ' fina l destinatio n i s generall yAlbany
. Th e Alban yconnectio n provide s acces s fo reducators , hospita l staf fan d loca l governmen t official s t o thei rheadquarters , eliminatin g overnigh tstay s fo rmeeting s an d eliminatin g th e driv e throug h th e Adirondacks
. Fo rthos e wit h destination s outsid e th e state , Alban yAirpor ti s wel l ru n an d smal l enoug h t o mak e eve n tigh t connection s easyt o make
. Th e Cessn a 40 2 aircraf t utilize d byCap e Ai ri s larg e enoug h t o handl e 8 passengers . Rarel yhav e I ha d a ful l fligh ti n th e tw o year s I hav e bee n flyin g i n an d ou t o fMassena
. Ho wca n th e large rplan e offere d b yth e newl ypropose d carrie rb e cos t effective ? Woul d thi s marke t reall ysuppor t fille d flight s i n an d ou to fBoston ? I doub tit , an d th e short-ter m servic e wit h large raircraf t i n th e pas t confirm s m ydoubts
. Althoug h th e vot e has bee n cas t no t t o suppor t Cap e Air' s extensio n bid , I understan d tha tth e FA Aan d D.O.T
. hav e a sa y i n th e decision
. You rdepartmen t has mos t likel yconsidere d th e sam e concern s I' m addressing here , still , I fee l strongl y tha t Cap e Ai ri s a goo d fi t fo rMassen a an d wa s compelle d t o voic e m yconcerns . Than k yo u fo ryou rtim e an d consideration
. Sincerely , Kathlee n A
. Samue l 9(}ttySaTtme { Qualit ySyste m Lea d Audito r Aico a - Lafayett e Operation s 313 1 Mai n Stree t Ufayette , i N 4790 5 phone : (765 ) 771-3161/(315)764-446 7 fax : (765)771-323 7 mobiie : (765 ) 404-384 4 Hom e Address : 587 3 Chas e Mills , N Y1362 1 Hom e Phone : (315 ) 769-647 3
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4204

To designate the Federal building located at 711 Washington Street in Boston, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research

Center on Aging’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 13, 1994

Mr. MOAKLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 711 Washington

Street in Boston, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Jean Mayer

Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 711 Washington

5 Street in Boston, Massachusetts, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research

7 Center on Aging’’.
2

•HR 4204 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Re6 search Center on Aging’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.1
 C.E.O.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE
ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 1, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) and 18
U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
that he is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.
 
 /s/
      Michael A. RichardsonMichael
      A. RichardsonChairman
      and Chief Executive OfficerAmerican
      Consumers, Inc.Date:  April
      14, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ERIC & CO TRADING GROUP LLC, CASE NO.: 23-CV-20045-RKA

Judgment Creditor,

v. 

FLOYD MAYWEATHER, JR.,

Judgment Debtor.

and 

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and 

ENHANCE HEALTH LLC, 

Garnishees.

___________________________________/

ORDER ON EX-PARTE MOTION FOR WRIT OF GARNISHMENT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Judgment Creditor, ERIC & CO TRADING 

GROUP LLC’s (“Judgment Creditor” or “Eric & Co.”) Ex-Parte Motion for Writ of Garnishment 

(the “Motion”) filed with the Court on August 22, 2023. The Court having reviewed the Motion 

and pleadings in this case and being fully apprised on the premises, it is hereby:

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is 

directed to issue the Writs of Garnishment.

DONE and ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August ____, 2023. 

___________________________________

ROY K. ALTMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Zachary P Hyman, Esq.

Floyd Mayweather, Jr., Judgment Debtor 

288 South Coconut Lane, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 

Case 1:23-cv-20045-RKA Document 17-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2023 Page 1 of 1
# Úradný vestník C 394/2017

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 394 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 6022. novembra 2017 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 394

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 6022. novembra 2017

---

| Číslo oznamu | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Informácie |
| | INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE |
| | Európska komisia |
| 2017/C 394/01 | Výmenný kurz eura | 1 |

Číslo oznamu

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

2017/C 394/01

Výmenný kurz eura

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

IV Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

| 22.11.2017 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | C 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2017

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

C 394/1

---

Výmenný kurz eura (1)

21. novembra 2017

(2017/C 394/01)

1 euro =

| | Mena | Výmenný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | Americký dolár | 1,1718 |
| JPY | Japonský jen | 131,87 |
| DKK | Dánska koruna | 7,4414 |
| GBP | Britská libra | 0,88498 |
| SEK | Švédska koruna | 9,9473 |
| CHF | Švajčiarsky frank | 1,1641 |
| ISK | Islandská koruna | |
| NOK | Nórska koruna | 9,6890 |
| BGN | Bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Česká koruna | 25,533 |
| HUF | Maďarský forint | 312,93 |
| PLN | Poľský zlotý | 4,2290 |
| RON | Rumunský lei | 4,6568 |
| TRY | Turecká líra | 4,6304 |
| AUD | Austrálsky dolár | 1,5466 |
| CAD | Kanadský dolár | 1,5006 |
| HKD | Hongkongský dolár | 9,1545 |
| NZD | Novozélandský dolár | 1,7181 |
| SGD | Singapurský dolár | 1,5878 |
| KRW | Juhokórejský won | 1 276,68 |
| ZAR | Juhoafrický rand | 16,4989 |
| CNY | Čínsky juan | 7,7725 |
| HRK | Chorvátska kuna | 7,5650 |
| IDR | Indonézska rupia | 15 850,94 |
| MYR | Malajzijský ringgit | 4,8421 |
| PHP | Filipínske peso | 59,335 |
| RUB | Ruský rubeľ | 69,5585 |
| THB | Thajský baht | 38,406 |
| BRL | Brazílsky real | 3,8207 |
| MXN | Mexické peso | 22,2026 |
| INR | Indická rupia | 76,0705 |

Mena

Výmenný kurz

USD

Americký dolár

1,1718

JPY

Japonský jen

131,87

DKK

Dánska koruna

7,4414

GBP

Britská libra

0,88498

SEK

Švédska koruna

9,9473

CHF

Švajčiarsky frank

1,1641

ISK

Islandská koruna

NOK

Nórska koruna

9,6890

BGN

Bulharský lev

1,9558

CZK

Česká koruna

25,533

HUF

Maďarský forint

312,93

PLN

Poľský zlotý

4,2290

RON

Rumunský lei

4,6568

TRY

Turecká líra

4,6304

AUD

Austrálsky dolár

1,5466

CAD

Kanadský dolár

1,5006

HKD

Hongkongský dolár

9,1545

NZD

Novozélandský dolár

1,7181

SGD

Singapurský dolár

1,5878

KRW

Juhokórejský won

1 276,68

ZAR

Juhoafrický rand

16,4989

CNY

Čínsky juan

7,7725

HRK

Chorvátska kuna

7,5650

IDR

Indonézska rupia

15 850,94

MYR

Malajzijský ringgit

4,8421

PHP

Filipínske peso

59,335

RUB

Ruský rubeľ

69,5585

THB

Thajský baht

38,406

BRL

Brazílsky real

3,8207

MXN

Mexické peso

22,2026

INR

Indická rupia

76,0705

---

(1)  Zdroj: referenčný výmenný kurz publikovaný ECB.

---
No. 10-10967.

#### Thomas *v.*Louisiana.

Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00073-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.J., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 322nd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (322-679090-20)

August 5, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
#### § 302-17.4 Why is the reimbursement for substantially all, and not exactly all, of the additional income taxes incurred as a result of a relocation?

Because of the complexity of the calculations, which involve not only Federal income tax but also the income tax rates of many states and localities, it is not reasonable for the Government to compute the exact impact of relocation on an affected employee's taxes. Making a good faith effort to reimburse substantially all additional income taxes is sufficient. The statute where this appears, at 5 U.S.C. 5724b does not define substantially all. This Part provides the description through its provisions.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of American Science & Engineering, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:



|Date: November 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Anthony R. FabianoAnthony R. Fabiano
President and Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Science & Engineering, Inc. and will be retained by American
Science & Engineering, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5559

To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to establish a

temporary bid cap on electric power sold at wholesale in New York State.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 2000

Mr. WEINER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to

establish a temporary bid cap on electric power sold

at wholesale in New York State.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New York Electricity

5 Price Spike Relief Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY BID CAP ON NEW YORK POWER SALES.

7 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall,

8 immediately after the enactment of this Act, issue an

9 order establishing a temporary bid cap of $250 per MWh

10 for wholesale power sales to the New York Independent
2

•HR 5559 IH

1 System Operator. Such order shall remain in effect for

2 a period of 6 months after the date of issuance.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5559 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5559

  To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to establish a 
   temporary bid cap on electric power sold at wholesale in New York 
                                 State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 25, 2000

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to establish a 
   temporary bid cap on electric power sold at wholesale in New York 
                                 State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New York Electricity Price Spike 
Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY BID CAP ON NEW YORK POWER SALES.

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall, immediately after 
the enactment of this Act, issue an order establishing a temporary bid 
cap of $250 per MWh for wholesale power sales to the New York 
Independent System Operator. Such order shall remain in effect for a 
period of 6 months after the date of issuance.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-9175.

#### Irby *v.*United States.

C..A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF POLICY

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Transmittal to Docket: Summary of the March 15, 2011, Public Meeting in 

Springfield, Missouri, regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s 

Implementation of Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review

FROM: Stuart C. Miles-McLean

Office of Regulatory Policy and Management

TO: Public Docket #EPA-HQ-OA-2011-0156: Improving Regulations: General

As called for by President Obama in Executive Order 13563, "to facilitate the periodic 

review of existing significant regulations," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is 

considering "how best to promote retrospective analysis of rules that may be outmoded, 

ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal 

them in accordance with what has been learned." 

As part of its retrospective review of regulations, EPA convened public meetings around 

the country to gather input on how we might design the plan we will use to periodically review 

our regulations. This Memo transmits to the docket a summary of the public meeting held on

March 15, 2011, in Springfield, Missouri.
#### § 128-48.501-3 Owner.

The person who has primary and direct title to property (see 28 CFR 9.2(e)).
#### § 102-118.210 May my agency use bills of lading other than the GBL for a transportation shipment?

Yes, as long as the mandatory terms and conditions contained in this part (as also stated on a GBL) apply. The TSP must agree in writing to the mandatory terms and conditions (also found in the “U.S. Government Freight Transportation Handbook”) contained in this part.
#### § 301-10.106 Am I authorized to receive or keep a refund or credit for unused transportation?

No. You are not authorized to receive or keep a refund, credit, or any other negotiable document from a transportation service provider for undelivered services (except as provided in § 301-10.123) or any portion of an unused ticket issued in exchange for a GTR or billed to an agency's centrally billed account. However, any charges billed directly to your individually billed Government charge card account should be credited to your account. You must immediately remit to the Government for any unused transportation expense(s) credited to your individually billed Government charge card account.

[FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55703, Sept. 12, 2022]
EXHIBIT 13.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Celulosa Arauco y Constitución S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 29, 2005



/s/ Matías DomeykoName:

Matías DomeykoTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




Date: June 29, 2005



/s/ Robinson TajmuchName:

Robinson TajmuchTitle:

Chief Accounting Officer
#### § 301-52.18 Within how many calendar days after I submit a travel claim must my agency notify me of any error that would prevent payment within 30 calendar days after submission?

Your agency must notify you as soon as practicable after you submit your travel claim of any error that would prevent payment within 30 calendar days after submission and must provide the reason(s) why your travel claim is not proper. However, not later than May 1, 2002, agencies must achieve a maximum time period of seven working days for notifying you that your travel claim is not proper.

[FTR Amdt. 92, 65 FR 21366, Apr. 21, 2000]