alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3604

___________ Gaylon Richard Cox, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * United States of America, * [PUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 28, 2002 Filed: July 1, 2002

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Gaylon Richard Cox pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting bank robbery, being a felon in possession of a firearm, and attempting to escape from custody. The district court sentenced Cox to life imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c). Cox appealed, and we affirmed. See United States v. Cox , 225 F.3d 1018 (8th Cir. 2000). Cox then filed the present 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion asserting four grounds for relief. The district court denied the motion, and granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on two issues: whether Cox's guilty plea was involuntary because of mental illness and medication, and whether he was denied effective assistance of counsel.-2- On appeal, Cox argues counsel was ineffective for failing to request an independent psychiatric evaluation, by which to show Cox's incompetence, and for failing to petition for certiorari as promised. He also attempts to challenge the application of section 3559(c), but our review is limited to the issues specified in the COA. See Hubbeling v. United States , 288 F.3d 363, 364-65 (8th Cir. 2002). We conclude Cox did not establish counsel's ineffectiveness on the competency issue. See United States v. Duke , 50 F.3d 571, 576 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 516 U.S. 885 (1995); Iron Wing v. United States , 34 F.3d 662, 664 (8th Cir. 1994). No evidence suggests the court-ordered psychiatric evaluation–finding Cox legally responsible at the time of the offense and competent to stand trial–was flawed. See Pool v. Armontrout , 852 F.2d 372, 376-77 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied , 489 U.S. 1023 (1989). Moreover, at the plea hearing Cox stated he understood the charge and understood he faced a life sentence if the government prevailed on its section 3559(c) motion; the district court, having observed his demeanor and behavior in the courtroom, found he behaved rationally throughout the proceedings; and no evidence indicates any medication rendered him incompetent. SeeUnited States v. JimenezVillasenor , 270 F.3d 554, 561 (8th Cir. 2001). We agree with the government, however, in light of counsel's failure to file the promised petition for certiorari, that our judgment affirming Cox's conviction should be vacated and a new judgment entered to allow the timely filing of the petition. See Wilkins v. United States , 441 U.S. 468, 469 (1979) (per curiam); Wilson v. United States , 554 F.2d 893, 894 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied , 434 U.S. 849 (1977). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment entered on September 19, 2000 in United States v. Cox , No. 00-1610, and direct the clerk to enter a new judgment. We otherwise affirm the district court.-3- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 105-55.021 Enforcement policy.

Pursuant to this section, the General Services Administration may compromise statutory penalties, forfeitures, or claims established as an aid to enforcement and to compel compliance, if the Agency's enforcement policy in terms of deterrence and securing compliance, present and future, will be adequately served by the Agency's acceptance of the sum to be agreed upon.
Case 1:22-cv-23115-JEM Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel, Comparative Medicine.                    

*Date:*                         July 25, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 AM to 12:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Gaithersburg Marriott, Washingtonian Center, 9751 Washingtonina Blvd., Gaithersburg, MD 20878.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John D. Harding, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, (301) 435-0810.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 15, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-15756  Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  STATEMENT  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF
INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                      0000003941
<NAME>                     ALLIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                             489
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                       652
<INVENTORY>                                    125,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               206,708
<PP&E>                                         111,848
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          169,570
<BONDS>                                          1,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   286,873
<SALES>                                        151,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,816
<CGS>                                          113,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   103
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,048
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,617
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,431
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,431
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03



</TABLE>
steam_record - Fwd: Fw: Conemaugh Generatign Station, Request for Extension 

 

>>> <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> 6/23/2010 11:10 AM >>> 

FYI - First extension request received! 

----- Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 06/23/2010 11:10 AM 

----- 

 

 From: "Beer, Richard G" <rbeer@rrienergy.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Balog, John A" <jbalog@rrienergy.com>, "Frank, Stephen" <SFrank@rrienergy.com>, "Smith, 

James R. (Randy)" 

 <JRSmith@rrienergy.com> 

 

 Date: 06/23/2010 10:49 AM 

 Subject: Conemaugh Generatign Station, Request for Extension 

Please find attached a Request for Extension, Steam Electric ELG 

Questionnaire, Conemaugh Generating Station, Plant ID 02268. 

Conemaugh Station 

PO Box K 

1442 Power Plant Road 

New Florence, PA 15944 

Tel: 724-235-4596 

Fax: 724-235-4511 

(See attached file: 20100623104147351.pdf) 

From: Deborah Bartram

To: steam_record

Date: 6/29/2010 6:12 PM

Subject: Fwd: Fw: Conemaugh Generatign Station, Request for Extension

Attachments: 20100623104147351.pdf

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2A3793DO... 3/1/2011
AMERICAS 124105291 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-24066-KMM 

GRACE INC., et al, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

CITY OF MIAMI, 

 Defendant, 

_________________________________________/ 

MEDIATOR’S REPORT 

Pursuant to this Court’s order dated May 23, 2023, this case was mediated on June 13, 

2023. The undersigned acted as mediator in this case. Although the parties agreed to keep open 

the lines of communication after the mediation, the mediation ultimately resulted in: 

_____ A signed settlement agreement as to all issues. 

 X An impasse or lack of agreement 

_____ Adjournment 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2023 Page 1 of 3
Case No. 1:22-CV-24066-KMM

AMERICAS 124105291 2

Dated: June 23, 2023 Respectfully Submitted, 

WHITE & CASE LLP 

/s/ Raoul G. Cantero 

Raoul G. Cantero 

Florida Bar No. 552356 

Southeast Financial Center 

200 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 4900 

Miami, Florida 33131-2352 

Telephone: (305) 371-2700 

Facsimile: (305) 358-5744 

E-mail: rcantero@whitecase.com 

E-mail: ldominguez@whitecase.com 

Mediator

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2023 Page 2 of 3
Case No. 1:22-CV-24066-KMM

AMERICAS 124105291 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been filed through the Court’s 

CM/ECF system and a copy was served on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices of 

Electronic Filing generated by the CM/ECF system on this 23rd day of June 2023. 

BY: Raoul G. Cantero 

 Raoul G. Cantero 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2023 Page 3 of 3
No. 10-10959.

#### Sparks *v.*Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 509 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 104
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 509

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 1999

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the personal 
   representative of the estate of Fred Steffens of Big Horn County, 
     Wyoming, certain land comprising the Steffens family property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF STEFFENS FAMILY PROPERTY.

    (a) Conveyance.--Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary of 
the Interior is directed to issue, without consideration, a quitclaim 
deed to Marie Wambeke of Big Horn County, Wyoming, the personal 
representative of the estate of Fred Steffens, to the land described in 
subsection (b): Provided, That all minerals underlying such land are 
hereby reserved to the United States.
    (b) Land Description.--The land referred to in subsection (a) is 
the approximately 80-acre parcel known as ``Farm Unit C'' in the E\1/
2\NW\1/4\ of Section 27 in Township 57 North, Range 97 West, 6th 
Principal Meridian, Wyoming.
    (c) Revocation of Withdrawal.--The Bureau of Reclamation withdrawal 
for the Shoshone Reclamation Project under Secretarial Order dated 
October 21, 1913, is hereby revoked with respect to the lands described 
in subsection (b).

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 104

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 509

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the personal 
   representative of the estate of Fred Steffens of Big Horn County, 
     Wyoming, certain land comprising the Steffens family property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 5, 1999

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
# Comments on: 20-1947: CELLSPIN SOFT, INC. v. CANON U.S.A., INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
#### § 101-18.0 Cross-reference to the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) 41 CFR chapter 102 parts 1 through 220).

For information on acquisition of real property, *see* FMR part 102-73 (41 CFR part 102-73).
No. 11-8387.

#### Nava *v.*Knowles, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Albritten v. Commonwealth.

(Decided November 17, 1916.)

Appeal from Calloway Circuit Court.

Criminal Law — Statute Defendant Should be Tried Under — Indeterminate Sentence. — One charged with a crime should be tried under the statute in effect at the time the crime was committed, and not under an amendment to that statute which afterwards became effective and was in force at the time of the trial. (Coleman v. Commonwealth, 160 Ky. 87.)

COLEMAN & LANCASTER for appellant.

M. M. LOGAN, Attorney General, and OVERTON S. HOGAN, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Turner

Reversing.

Appellant was indicted in the Calloway circuit court charged with the crime of murder committed in that county in May, 1916.

A trial was had and resulted in a verdict finding him guilty of voluntary manslaughter and fixing his punishment at twenty years’ confinement in the state penitentiary as was authorized by the instructions of the court. He entered his motion for a new trial, and the same having been overruled, he has appealed.

The crime was committed in May, 1916, and before the present indeterminate sentence law in this state became effective, and his chief complaint on the appeal is *275that lie should have been tried under the law in force when the crime was committed.

Section 1136 of the Kentucky Statutes, which was the indeterminate sentence law in effect in May, 1916, provides that the jury, if they find the defendant guilty, shall fix and render against him an indeterminate sentence for an indefinite term, stating in such verdict the minimum and maximum limits thereof, the minimum not to be less than the minimum time or the maximum greater than the maximum time prescribed by law.

This statute, however, was repealed by an Act of March 23rd, 1916 (Acts 1916, 430) wherein the jury is required to fix by their verdict a punishment to be inflicted within the period prescribed by law. This' act, however, did not become effective until June, 1916, and the appellant should have been tried under section 1136, Kentucky Statutes, the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime. Coleman v. Commonwealth, 160 Ky. 87.

We perceive no other error in the record, but for the error indicated the judgment is reversed, with directions to grant appellant a new trial, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Sample Evaluator Assessment Form

Evaluation plan/approach

1=Strongly Disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Neutral; 4=Agree; 5=Strongly Agree

Proposes models, methods, or designs that support the goals and objectives of 

the evaluation (e.g., describes approach for including comparison/control group 

if solicitation specifies an impact evaluation is desired)

1 2 3 4 5

Proposes a comprehensive and cohesive evaluation plan/approach to 

accomplish the statement of work (i.e., describes a streamlined and efficient 

approach for how the work will be done)

1 2 3 4 5

Proposes appropriate data collection and analysis strategies, given program 

characteristics and timeline

1 2 3 4 5

Describes potential challenges to carrying out the proposed evaluation design 

and provides strategies to address those issues

1 2 3 4 5

Demonstrates an understanding of our AmeriCorps program, including our

program’s target population and the broader context in which we operate

1 2 3 4 5

Reviewer Notes: Section score:

Evaluator qualifications

Demonstrates appropriate academic preparation and professional qualifications 

for the type of evaluation to be conducted

1 2 3 4 5

Demonstrates experience conducting similar types of evaluations (i.e. 

experience evaluating similar programs with the type of evaluation design and 

methods you wish to employ)

1 2 3 4 5

Has no conflict of interest with our AmeriCorps program (e.g., will not directly 

benefit in any way from the findings of the evaluation)

1 2 3 4 5

Reviewer Notes: Section score:

Communication style

Demonstrates an ability to clearly and concisely communicate evaluation 

concepts in non-technical language (in written, oral and/or visual form)

1 2 3 4 5

Samples of prior evaluation reports or products are clear, organized, readable, 

and useful for decision-making. 

1 2 3 4 5

Reviewer Notes: Section score:

Project management

Demonstrates an ability to effectively lead and manage the evaluation project 1 2 3 4 5

Demonstrates willingness to engage program staff on a regular basis to provide 

progress updates and gather input and feedback on the direction of their work

1 2 3 4 5

Demonstrates an ability to adhere to a project schedule and conduct work in a 

timely fashion

1 2 3 4 5

Proposes a reasonable timeline and schedule of deliverables that aligns with 

the timeline specifications in the solicitation

1 2 3 4 5

Cost

Staffing, materials and supplies, equipment, and travel costs for each major 

evaluation component are adequate and reasonable 

1 2 3 4 5

Amount and distribution of staff hours are adequate and reasonable 1 2 3 4 5

Reviewer Notes: Section score:

Overall score:

1
Reviewer Notes

Describe strengths -

Describe weaknesses - 

Overall impressions -

2
No. 10-10999.

#### Brayboy *v.*Robeson County Board of Education.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2000 P
§ 109-1.5108 Personal property records requirements. The contractor's property control records shall provide the following information for every accountable item of Government personal property in the contractor's possession and any other data elements required by specific contract provisions: ( a ) Contract number or equivalent code designation.
( b ) Asset type.
( c ) Description of item (name, serial number, national stock number (if available)).
( d ) Property control number (Government ownership identity).
( e ) Unit acquisition cost (including delivery and installation cost, when appropriate, and unit of measure).
( f ) Acquisition document reference and date.
( g ) Manufacturer's name, model and serial number.
( h ) Quantity received, fabricated, issued or on hand.
( i ) Location (physical area)
( j ) Custodian name and organization code.
( k ) Use status (active, storage, excess, etc.)
( l ) High risk designation.
( m ) Disposition document reference and date.
#### § 105-68.930 Debarment.

*Debarment* means an action taken by a debarring official under subpart H of this part to exclude a person from participating in covered transactions and transactions covered under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1). A person so excluded is debarred.
§ 102-75.390 What does the term “surplus airport property” mean? For the purposes of this part, surplus airport property is any surplus real property including improvements and personal property included as a part of the operating unit that the Administrator of FAA deems is— ( a ) Essential, suitable, or desirable for the development, improvement, operation, or maintenance of a public airport, as defined in the Federal Airport Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1101); or
( b ) Reasonably necessary to fulfill the immediate and foreseeable future requirements of the grantee for the development, improvement, operation, or maintenance of a public airport, including property needed to develop sources of revenue from non-aviation businesses at a public airport. Approval for non-aviation revenue-producing areas may only be given for such areas as are anticipated to generate net proceeds that do not exceed expected deficits for operation of the aviation area applied for at the airport.
FY 2020 Q1 FOIA Quarterly Report

Agency

Corporation for National and Community Service

Reporting Quarter

2020 Q2

10 Oldest Requests

Did your agency have 10 or more perfected requests pending at the end of the last fiscal year? If so, 

please select the number 10. If your agency had fewer than 10, please select the correct number.

8

Of the ten or fewer requests identified in your previous response, please select the number of requests 

your agency has closed during the current fiscal year.

8

FOIA Requests Information

Component Requests Received in Requests Processed Requests Backlogged as of

Reporting Quarter in Reporting Quarter End of Reporting Quarter 

CNCS 13 9 0