alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John WASH, Appellant, v. Robert L. FERDINAND, Jr., Samuel Hines, Looking Good Management, Inc. and Crystal Sharon, Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-612

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed December 2, 2016

Rehearing Denied December 27, 2016

Jennifer R. Dixon, Terry C. Young, and James S. Toscano, of Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Scott D. Clark, Mitchell E. Albaugh, and Christopher M. Hamilton, of Clark & Al-baugh, LLP, Winter Park, for Appellee Robert L. Ferdinand, Jr.

No appearance for other Appellees.

EDWARDS, J.

After careful consideration, we affirm the trial court’s rulings on all but one issue raised on appeal. Because the trial court erred by failing to apportion the award of attorney’s fees between John Wash (“Appellant”) and his counsel, we remand the case to the trial court for entry of an amended order apportioning the fees between Appellant and his counsel as required by section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2014).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ., concur.
#### § 102-36.370 Are there special requirements concerning the use of excess personal property for disaster relief?

Yes, upon declaration by the President of an emergency or a major disaster, you may loan excess personal property to state and local governments, with or without compensation and prior to reporting it as excess to GSA, to alleviate suffering and damage resulting from any emergency or major disaster (Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121-5206) and Executive Order 12148 (3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 412), as amended). If the loan involves property that has already been reported excess to GSA, you may withdraw the item from the disposal process subject to approval by GSA. You may also withdraw excess personal property for use by your agency in providing assistance in disaster relief. You are still accountable for this property and your agency is responsible for developing agencywide procedures for recovery of such property.

[65 FR 31218, May 16, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 53572, Sept. 12, 2006]
#### Commonwealth v. Schneiter.

(Decided December 1, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Criminal Division).

Appeal and Error — Record—Sufficiency—Presumption.—In tbe absence of a transcript of tbe evidence on which the case was heard below, it will be presumed that the evidence supports the judgment and the judgment will be affirmed.

A. SCOTT BULLITT for appellant.

A. J. BIZOT and P. H. SAVAGE for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Fred Schneiter applied to the county court for a license to conduct a tavern in Jefferson County. A protest was filed by certain citizens. After hearing by the county court the license was refused. On appeal to the circuit court it was held that Schneiter was entitled to a license and the judgment of the county court was reversed. The Commonwealth appeals.

Whether or not the license was properly granted depends upon the facts. The case is here without a transcript of the evidence on which it was heard below! In the absence of the evidence, it will be presumed that the evidence supports the judgment and the judgment will be affirmed. Lowe v. Taylor, 172 Ky. 275; First State Bank of Irvington v. Richardson, et al., 167 Ky. (771, 181 S. W. 611.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 301-30.5 Are there any limitations to the payment of these expenses? Expenses are not payable when: ( a ) Confined to: ( 1 ) A medical facility within the proximity of your official station.
( 2 ) The same medical facility you would have been admitted to if your incapacitating illness or injury occurred at your official station.
( b ) The Government provides or reimburses you for hospitalization under any Federal statute (including hospitalization in a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical center or military hospital). However, per diem expenses are payable if your hospitalization is paid under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (5 U.S.C. 8901-8913).
[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15966, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2010-07, 75 FR 72967, Nov. 29, 2010]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-020-1310-00]


 

AGENCY:  Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Interior.

ACTION:  Notice of Intent for Planning Analyses.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Jackson Field Office, Eastern States, will prepare 
Planning Analyses (PA) for consideration of leasing six scattered 
tracts of Federal mineral estate for oil and gas exploration and 
development. The PAs will be prepared in concert with Environmental 
Analyses (EA).
    This notice is issued pursuant to Title 40 Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR) 1501.7 and Title 43 CFR 1610.2(c). The planning 
effort will follow the procedures set forth in 43 CFR Part 1600.
    The public is invited to participate in this planning process, 
beginning with the identification of planning issues and criteria.

DATES:  Comments relating to the identification of planning issues and 
criteria will be accepted for thirty days from the date of this 
publication.

ADDRESSES:  Send comments to Bureau of Land Management, Jackson Field 
Office, 411 Briarwood Drive, Suite 404, Jackson, Mississippi 39206.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Quazi T. Islam, Physical Scientist, 
Jackson Field Office, (601) 977-5400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The BLM has responsibility to consider 
applications to lease Federal mineral estate for oil and gas 
exploration and development. An interdisciplinary team will be used in 
the preparation of the PA/EAs. Preliminary issues, subject to change as 
a result of public input, are (1) potential impacts of oil and gas 
exploration and development on the surface resources and (2) 
consideration of restrictions on lease rights to protect surface 
resources.
    Due to the scattered nature of the six tracts proposed for leasing, 
a separate analysis will be prepared for each tract.
    Tract locations, along with acreages, are listed below.

Alabama, Tuscaloosa County, Huntsville Meridian

    T 18 S, R 8 W, Section 7; T 18 S, R 9 W, Sections 11 and 12; 
200.94 acres.

Louisiana, Concordia Parish, 5th Principal Meridian

    T 5 N, R 9 E, Sections 66 and 67; 112.80 acres.

Mississippi, Lamar County, St. Stephens Meridian

    T 2 N, R 16 W, Sections 11, 12, 13, and 14; 1,470.0 acres.

Mississippi, Covington County, St. Stephens Meridian

    T 8 N, R 14 W, Section 4; 40.0 acres.

Mississippi, Covington County, St. Stephens Meridian

    T 6 N, R 54 W, Sections 8 and 17; 70.0 acres.

Virginia, Dickenson County

    Tract No. 550G, Parcel A-3. 200.61 acres.

    Due to the limited scope of this PA/EA process, public meetings are 
not scheduled.

Bruce E. Dawson,
Field Manager, Jackson Field Office.
[FR Doc. 00-1605 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GS-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 22, 2020

p1214

Order 

Clerk

December 22, 2020

160354 & (18)(24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160354

COA: 348687

Calhoun CC: 2016-001394-FC

LARRY MAX LAWHEAD, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2019 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motions to remand are DENIED.
#### Marvin S. BURROUGHS, Defendant-Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff-Below, Appellee.

No. 176, 2016

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: October 13, 2016

Decided: October 27, 2016

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware, Cr. ID No. 0710007029

AFFIRMED.
**GAO-10-758R**                      Published: Jul 02, 2010. Publicly Released: Jul 02, 2010.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

This letter formally transmits the briefing in response to a congressional request on May 4, 2009, that we review the EFV program. We provided congressional staff a draft copy of this briefing in meeting with them on June 9, 2010. We provided the same draft to the Department of Defense (DOD) for comments. A summary of DOD's comments with our evaluation are also attached, as well as a reprinted copy of DOD's written comments.

## Recommendations

## Recommendations for Executive Action

See All 5 Recommendations

## Full Report

Full Report (32 pages)

Accessible Text 

## GAO Contacts

Michael J. Sullivan
sullivanm@gao.gov

(202) 512-4841

## Office of Public Affairs

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Government Operations

Cost analysisDevelopmental testingMilitary land vehiclesMilitary materielMilitary procurementMilitary technologyOperational testingPerformance measuresProcurement planningProgram evaluationRisk factorsSchedule slippagesProgram costs
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 674 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 674

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that natural gas 
   gathering lines are 7-year property for purposes of depreciation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1999

 Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mr. McCrery, and Mr. Watkins) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that natural gas 
   gathering lines are 7-year property for purposes of depreciation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATURAL GAS GATHERING LINES TREATED AS 7-YEAR PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (C) of section 168(e)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to classification of certain 
property) is amended by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii) and 
by inserting after clause (i) the following new clause:
                            ``(ii) any natural gas gathering line, 
                        and''.
    (b) Natural Gas Gathering Line.--Subsection (i) of section 168 of 
such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(15) Natural gas gathering line.--The term `natural gas 
        gathering line' means the pipe, equipment, and appurtenances 
        used to deliver natural gas from the wellhead to the point at 
        which such gas first reaches--
                    ``(A) a gas processing plant,
                    ``(B) an interconnection with an interstate 
                natural-gas company (as defined in section 2(6) of the 
                Natural Gas Act), or
                    ``(C) an interconnection with an intrastate 
                transmission pipeline.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service before, on, or after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Comments on: 2022-1595: Genentech, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 725

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage

penalty in the standard deduction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. KLECZKA (for himself, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr.

NEAL of Massachusetts, and Mr. MATSUI) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate

the marriage penalty in the standard deduction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY IN

4 STANDARD DEDUCTION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 63(c) of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to standard

7 deduction) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ in subparagraph (A)

9 and inserting ‘‘twice the dollar amount in effect

10 under subparagraph (C) for the taxable year’’,
2

•HR 725 IH

1 (2) by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph

2 (B),

3 (3) by striking ‘‘in the case of’’ and all that fol4 lows in subparagraph (C) and inserting ‘‘in any

5 other case.’’, and

6 (4) by striking subparagraph (D).

7 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—

8 (1) Subparagraph (B) of section 1(f)(6) of such

9 Code is amended by striking ‘‘(other than with’’ and

10 all that follows through ‘‘shall be applied’’ and in11 serting ‘‘(other than with respect to sections

12 63(c)(4) and 151(d)(4)(A)) shall be applied’’.

13 (2) Paragraph (4) of section 63(c) of such Code

14 is amended by adding at the end the following flush

15 sentence:

16 ‘‘The preceding sentence shall not apply to the

17 amount referred to in paragraph (2)(A).’’.

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

19 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

20 December 31, 1998.

Æ
§ 101-39.300 General. ( a ) The objective of the General Services Administration (GSA) Interagency Fleet Management System (IFMS) is to provide efficient and economical motor vehicle and related services to participating agencies. To attain this objective, policies and procedures for use and care of GSA IFMS vehicles provided to an agency or activity are prescribed in this subpart.
( b ) To operate a motor vehicle furnished by the GSA IFMS, civilian employees of the Federal Government shall have a valid State, District of Columbia, or Commonwealth operator's license for the type of vehicle to be operated and some form of agency identification. Non-Government personnel, such as contractors, shall have a valid license for the type of equipment to be operated when using vehicles supplied by the GSA IFMS (this may include a Commercial Driver's License). All other vehicle operators, and Federal civilian employees that have a valid civilian operator's license, but not for the type of equipment to be operated, must have in their possession an Optional Form 346, U.S. Government Motor Vehicle Operator's Identification Card, for the type of equipment to be operated. Specific regulations covering procedures and qualifications of Government motor vehicle operators are contained in 5 CFR part 930, issued by the Office of Personnel Management.
( c ) To operate a motor vehicle furnished by GSA, drivers and occupants shall wear safety belts whenever the vehicle is in operation. The vehicle operator shall ensure that all vehicle occupants are wearing their safety belts prior to operating the vehicle.
( d ) The use of tobacco products is prohibited in GSA IFMS motor vehicles. The agency to which the vehicle is assigned is responsible for ensuring that its employees do not use tobacco products while occupying IFMS vehicles. If a user agency violates this prohibition, the agency will be charged for the cost of cleaning the affected vehicle(s) beyond normal detailing procedures to remove tobacco odor or residue or repairing damage caused as a result of tobacco use. The decision to perform such additional cleaning or repair will be made by the GSA fleet manager based upon the condition of the vehicle when assigned, the degree of tobacco residue and damage, and the cost effectiveness of such additional cleaning.
( e ) Reasonable diligence in the care of GSA IFMS vehicles shall be exercised by using agencies and operators at all times. Officials or employees failing to take proper care of motor vehicles issued to them may be refused further authorization to use GSA IFMS vehicles after reasonable notice has been provided by GSA to the head of the local activity concerned.
[56 FR 59890, Nov. 26, 1991, as amended at 58 FR 63532, Dec. 2, 1993]
#### § 105-64.201 How do I get access to my records?

You may request access to your record in person or by writing to the system manager or, in the case of geographically dispersed records, to the office maintaining the records (*see* appendix A to this part). Parents or guardians may obtain access to records of minors or when a court has determined that the individual of record is incompetent.
##### 



Exhibit (31)a Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Zev Weiss, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of American Greetings Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of American Greetings Corporation as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    American Greetings Corporations other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for American Greetings Corporation and we have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to American Greetings Corporation, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of American Greetings Corporations
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in American Greetings Corporations
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the third quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
American Greetings Corporations internal control over financial reporting; 35




---



##### 



5.
    American Greetings Corporations other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to American Greetings
Corporations auditors and the audit committee of American Greetings Corporations board of
directors:  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect American Greetings Corporations ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in American Greetings Corporations internal
control over financial reporting. January 7, 2005
    
    /s/ Zev WeissZev WeissChief Executive Officer
 36
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 682 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 682

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to accelerate the phasein of 
        the $1,000,000 exclusion from the estate and gift taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1999

 Mr. McInnis (for himself, Mr. Watkins, Mr. Packard, and Mr. Ehrlich) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to accelerate the phasein of 
        the $1,000,000 exclusion from the estate and gift taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Death Tax Relief Now Act''.

SEC. 2. $1,000,000 EXEMPTION FROM ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 2010 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to applicable credit amount) is amended 
to read as follows:
    ``(c) Applicable Credit Amount.--
            ``(1) In general.--For purposes of this section, the 
        applicable credit amount is $345,800.
            ``(2) Applicable exclusion amount.--For purposes of the 
        provisions of this title which refer to this subsection, the 
        applicable exclusion amount is $1,000,000.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to estates of decedents dying, and gifts made, after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```