alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT B

Case 1:23-cv-20045-RKA Document 17-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2023 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:23-cv-20045-RKA Document 17-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2023 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:23-cv-20045-RKA Document 17-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2023 Page 3 of 3
Natoma

Manors

Bay

Heights

Golden Pines

North

Grove

Shorecrest

Bay Point

Miami International Airport

Morningside

Grapeland Heights

Little Havana Dodge Island

Shenandoah

Virginia Key

Auburndale

Liberty City

Silver Bluff

Wynwood

Little River

Downtown

The Roads

Allapattah

Little Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

C

O

C

O

N

U

T

G

R

O

V

E

pU

ep Er sa St edi

r et a wegdE

2

0

1

3

Pla

n

Districts

12345

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-22 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 DATED JANUARY 29, 2017 

TO THE 
 IXIA OFFICER SEVERANCE PLAN 

(As Amended and Restated effective February 12, 2016) 

WHEREAS, Ixia (“Ixia” or the “Company”) previously adopted the Officer Severance Plan effective September 1,
2000 (the “Plan”), in order to provide severance benefits to certain officers of the Company; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company
amended and restated the Plan effective January 1, 2009 in the form of the Ixia Officer Severance Plan (As Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2009), which plan, as amended, was further amended and restated effective
February 12, 2016 in the form of the Ixia Officer Severance Plan (As Amended and Restated effective February 12, 2016) (the “Restated Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Restated Plan pursuant to Section 10(g) thereof; and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Restated Plan to implement a “best net” provision with respect to certain severance
benefits potentially payable to Eligible Officers (as defined in the Restated Plan); 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective immediately, Section
4(h) of the Restated Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

“(h)        Section 280G and Best Net After-Tax. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, to the extent that the severance benefits to be paid to an Eligible Officer exceed an amount equal to three times the Eligible Officer’s base
compensation as determined pursuant to Code Section 280G (“Threshold 280G Compensation”) and triggers the Code Section 4999 excise tax or any interest or penalties with respect to such excise tax (collectively, the “Excise
Tax”), Ixia shall determine, reasonably and in good faith, whether a reduction in the severance benefits by the minimum amount necessary to ensure that they are less than the Threshold 280G Compensation would result in such Eligible Officer
receiving greater after-tax severance benefits than he or she would receive if the full severance benefits were paid. In the event the net after-tax severance benefits
payable after such reduction is greater than the full severance benefits without any such reduction, the amount of severance benefits shall be reduced to the minimum extent necessary to ensure that the severance benefits do not exceed the Threshold
280G Compensation. Any such reductions shall be made first from compensation which is not deferred compensation subject to regulation under Code Section 409A. In the event the net after-tax severance benefits
payable after such reduction is less than the full severance benefits payable without any such reduction, the Eligible Officer shall be entitled to receive all such severance benefits and shall be solely liable for any and all Excise Tax related
thereto. This Section 4(h) shall apply only with respect to a severance benefit which is a “parachute payment” within the meaning of Code Section 280G.” 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ixia, as the Company, has caused this instrument to be duly executed. 

 

							
		 	IXIA	 	
				
	 Dated: January 29, 2017
	 	By:	 	         /s/ Bethany Mayer
	 	
		 		 	   Bethany Mayer
	 	
		 		 	   President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case Number: 22-23871-CIV-MARTINEZ

MODEL ME KIDS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

MODEL-ME-KIDS, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ON FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT PROCEDURE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Clerk’s Default entered against Defendant

Model-Me-Kids, Inc. (“Defendant”). (ECF No. 11). Upon review of the record, it appears that 

Defendant has indeed failed to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. On or before February 6, 2023, Defendant shall (1) file an answer or other 

response to the Complaint, and (2) file a motion to set aside the Clerk’s Default that shows good 

cause for Defendant’s failure to timely respond to the Complaint. If Defendant fails to do so, final 

default judgment may be entered.1 In other words, Defendant must object to the Clerk’s Default 

by the above deadline or Plaintiff may be able to obtain the relief requested in its Complaint.

2. On or before February 13, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a motion for final default 

judgment that includes affidavits of the amounts due by Defendant, if necessary, and any other 

1 The Court notes that a corporation must be represented by counsel and cannot proceed pro 

se. Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985). Accordingly, any pleadings 

or documents filed by the corporate Defendants must be filed through counsel. 

Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2023 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

supporting documentation necessary to determine the measure of damages and/or conclude this 

action. Plaintiff shall send a copy of the motion to Defendant’s counsel, or to Defendant itself, if 

Defendant does not have counsel. In the certificate of service, Plaintiff shall indicate that notice 

was sent and the address to where it was sent. Plaintiff’s failure to file a motion for final default 

judgment within the specified time will result in a dismissal without prejudice.

3. Plaintiff shall immediately send a copy of this Order to Defendant and file a 

certificate of service on the record.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case for 

statistical purposes only. This shall not affect the substantive rights of the parties.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 23rd day of January, 2023. 

____________________________________ 

JOSE E MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to: 

All Counsel of Record 

Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Vanguard Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/    ERIC G.
WINTEMUTE                 
|Eric G. Wintemute Chief Executive Officer



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID T.
JOHNSON                                                
|David T. Johnson Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer

May 6, 2011

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to American Vanguard Corporation and will be retained by American Vanguard Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in AML Communications, Inc.'s Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-82774 and 333-32486) and on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-51258 and 333-68097) of our report, dated May 27, 2003, which includes an emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company's ability to continue
as a going concern, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AML Communications, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2003.

|                                                                                  |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN, LLPSINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN,
LLP |  | 
|Los Angeles, California
June 27, 2003                                             |  | 

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 14.1

                                     FORM OF
                            Impax Laboratories, Inc.
                                Code Of Ethics Of
                          Senior Financial Officers(1)

This is to confirm that, in my role as _______________ of Impax Laboratories,
Inc. (the "Company"), I adhere to and advocate the following principles and
responsibilities governing my professional conduct.

1.   I act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of
     interest between personal and professional relationships and, to the extent
     any such conflicts arise, I resolve such conflicts honestly and ethically.

2.   I prepare or assist in preparing periodic reports filed by the Company with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission and other communications that are
     disseminated to the public that contain full, fair, accurate, timely and
     understandable disclosure.

3.   I comply with rules and regulations of federal, state and local governments
     and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.

4.   I act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence,
     without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my independent judgment
     to be subordinated to any conflicting interest.

5.   I promote ethical behavior among officers and employees under my
     supervision at the Company.

6.   I will promptly report any known violations of this Code to my superiors or
     to members of the Company's Board of Directors as circumstances require.

7.   I acknowledge that I am accountable to the Company for any violation by me
     of this Code and that the consequence of such violation will be prompt
     disciplinary action, up to and including my dismissal for cause.


------------------------------------             ---------------------------
Name:                                            Date
Title:



----------------------------
(1)  The code of ethics applies to the registrant's principal executive officer,
     principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or
     persons performing similar functions.
§ 109-1.5201 Policy. ( a ) Designated contractors shall establish, implement, and maintain a system that provides for an efficient personal property management program. The system shall be consistent with the terms of the contract; prescribed policies, procedures, regulations, statutes, and instructions; and directions from the contracting officer.
( b ) Designated contractors' personal property management systems shall not be considered acceptable until reviewed and approved in writing by the cognizant DOE contracting office in accordance with § 109-1.5205 of this subpart.
( c ) Designated contractors shall maintain their personal property management systems in writing. Revisions to the systems shall be approved in writing by the cognizant DOE contracting office in accordance with § 109-1.5205 of this subpart.
( d ) Designated contractors shall include their personal property management system in their management surveillance or internal review program in order to identify weaknesses and functions requiring corrective action.
( e ) Designated contractors are responsible and accountable for all Government personal property in the possession of subcontractors, and shall include appropriate provisions in their subcontracts and property management systems to assure that subcontractors establish and maintain efficient systems for the management of Government personal property in their possession in accordance with § 109-1.5204 of this subpart.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4190 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4190

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To designate the building located at 41-42 Norre Gade in Saint Thomas, 
     Virgin Islands, for the period of time during which it houses 
 operations of the United States Postal Service, as the Alvaro de Lugo 
                              Post Office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building located at 41-42 Norre Gade in Saint Thomas, Virgin 
Islands, shall, for the period of time during which it houses 
operations of the United States Postal Service, be known and designated 
as the ``Alvaro de Lugo Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall, with respect to the period referred to in section 1, be deemed 
to be a reference to the Alvaro de Lugo Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.

  
  
  






103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4190

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the building located at 41-42 Norre Gade in Saint Thomas, 
     Virgin Islands, for the period of time during which it houses 
 operations of the United States Postal Service, as the Alvaro de Lugo 
                              Post Office.`
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 801 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 801

 To modify retroactively the residence requirement for transmission of 
   citizenship to certain individuals born abroad before 1953 to one 
                  citizen parent and one alien parent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1999

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify retroactively the residence requirement for transmission of 
   citizenship to certain individuals born abroad before 1953 to one 
                  citizen parent and one alien parent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT FOR TRANSMISSION OF 
              CITIZENSHIP.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 201(g) of the Nationality 
Act of 1940 (providing for citizenship for a person born outside the 
geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions 
of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the 
United States who, prior to the birth of such person, resided in the 
United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods 
totaling not less than 10 years, at least 5 of which were after 
attaining the age of 16 years), the residence requirement in such 
section shall be considered to be satisfied by a citizen who otherwise 
satisfies the requirement, but who, after attaining the age of 16 
years, resided in the United States or its outlying possessions only 
for a period or periods totaling 3 years (or more).
    (b) Retroactive Application.--The immigration and nationality laws 
of the United States shall be applied to persons born before the date 
of the enactment of this Act as though subsection (a) had been in 
effect as of the date of their birth.
                                 <all>
```
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Carl Storck and Vicki Storck, Appellant s

No. 06

- 13

- 00066

- CV v.

Tres Lagos Property Owners Association, Inc., Appellee Appeal from the 62nd District Court of Franklin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

10964 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s judgment to the extent that it finds that

the that the July 2012 board of directors’ election of the Tres Lagos Property Owne rs

Association, Inc., was valid and render judgment that this election was invalid. We affirm the

trial court’s judgment in all other respects.

We further order that each party shall bear its own costs of appeal.

RENDERED AUGUST 8, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5003369 v1 BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. Application of SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. under 49 U.S.C. § 41718 for pendente lite authority to operate slot exemptions between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and Kansas City (DCA-MCI) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND RESPONSE OF REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:
Scott L. Durgin Vice President, Administration Ethan J. Blank, Vice President, General Counsel REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC. 8909 Purdue Road Indianapolis, Indiana 46268 Robert E. Cohn Patrick R. Rizzi HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 +1 202 637 4999/5659 robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com Counsel for REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

August 13, 2013\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5003369 v1 BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. Application of SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. under 49 U.S.C. § 41718 for pendente lite authority to operate slot exemptions between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and Kansas City (DCA-MCI) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182

August 13, 2013

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND RESPONSE OF REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC. The unauthorized Reply of Southwest Airlines Co. (“Southwest”), dated August 12, 2013, provides no new information other than confirming the accuracy of what Republic Airline Inc. (“Republic”) told the Department in its Answer in Opposition.1 That is, as Southwest concedes, the “factual predicate for Southwest’s July 29 application” for pendente lite exemption authority to use Republic’s two slot exemptions for DCA-MCI service has “ceased to exist”. (Southwest Reply at 4.) Accordingly, the Department should expeditiously dismiss Southwest’s application. Respectfully submitted,

Robert E. Cohn Patrick R. Rizzi HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 Counsel for REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

1 If the Department grants Southwest leave to file its Reply, then fairness dictates (and good cause exists) for the Department to grant Republic leave to file this Response to ensure a complete and accurate record is before the Department. See 14 C.F.R. 302.6(b).\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5003369 v1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Response of Republic Airline Inc. has been served this 13th day of August 2013, upon each of the following persons:
bob.kneisley@wnco.com; leslie.abbott@wnco.com; mark_vanloh@kcmo.org; tom_mckenna@kcmo.org; todd.homan@dot.gov; Dennis.devany@dot.gov; brian.ctr.meehan@faa.gov; peter.irving@dot.gov.; cindy.baraban@dot.gov; bob.goldner@dot.gov; Phil.Sunderland@MWAA.com; info@airlineinfo.com

Jonathan Echmalian
*

Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20987 Summary Calendar

KENNETH ELWOOD NARRON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CAROL VANCE ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CV-327

- - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kenneth Elwood Narron appeals the district court’s dismissal

of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A. Narron argues that the district court abused its

discretion in dismissing his Eighth Amendment conditions of

confinement and medical claims arising out of his alleged exposure

to the chemical “Scotchlite” manufactured by 3-M Company and used

at TDCJ-ID’s license plate plant. We have reviewed the record and

found no error in the reasoning of the district court in theNo. 96-20987

-2-

dismissal of these claims. S ee Narron v. Vance

, No. H-95-327 (S.D.

Tex., Sept. 13, 1996).

Narron argues that the district court abused its discretion

when it denied him permission to amend his complaint and in

limiting his amended complaint to ten pages. Narron did not in the

district court and still does not on appeal state what he intended

to allege in his amended complaint which would have changed the

outcome of this case. The district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying leave to amend the complaint. A she v.

Corley , 992 F.2d 540, 542 (5th Cir. 1993).

Narron argues that because 3-M supplied the chemical and

supervised its use, it acted under color of state law for § 1983

purposes. The fact that 3-M had a contract with TDCJ to supply a

chemical does not make 3-M a state actor. S ee Albright v. Longview

Polic e Dept. , 884 F.2d 835, 840-41 (5th Cir. 1989)(hospital

contracted with state to operate and manage a facility; only

functional interrelationship was the lease; hospital not a state

actor).

Narron raises numerous other issues related to various motions

filed by him in the district court and denied as moot, such as

discovery matters, intervention, class action certification,

medical testing, TRO and permanent injunction, and air, water and

soil testing. Because Narron’s underlying claims were frivolous,

the district court properly denied these motions as moot.No. 96-20987
-3-

Narron’s appeal is wi thout arguable merit and, thus,

frivolo us. S ee Howard v. King

, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. S ee 5th

Cir. R. 42.2. Narron is cautioned that any future frivolous

appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions. Narron is cautioned further to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.