alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.18



 Exhibit 10.18 
  





 
 October 27, 2016 

Timothy Sehn 
 Dear Timothy, 

Snap Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to confirm the terms of your full-time exempt employment as Senior Vice President of
Engineering on the following terms: 
 You will receive an annual salary of $500,000, which will be paid bi-weekly, less applicable payroll
deductions and tax withholdings. 
 In addition, employees qualify for a range of benefits. The Company may change compensation and benefits
at its discretion. 
 The Company acknowledges that it has previously issued equity awards to you under the Amended and Restated 2012 Equity
Incentive Plan. Nothing in this letter will amend or affect the terms of those previously granted awards. 
 In your work for the Company,
we do not want you to use or disclose any confidential, proprietary, or trade-secret information of any former employer or other person to whom you owe an obligation of confidentiality. Likewise, as an employee of the Company, you may learn about
confidential, proprietary, or trade-secret information related to the Company and its clients that you must not share with anyone outside the Company. 

As a Snap Inc. employee, you will be expected to follow Company policies and acknowledge in writing that you have read our Employee Handbook.
With the exception of the “employment at-will” policy discussed below, the Company may modify or eliminate its policies at its discretion. 

Your employment with the Company is at-will. This means that you may terminate your employment with the Company at any time and for any reason
simply by notifying us. Likewise, the Company may terminate your employment at any time and for any reason with no advance notice. Your employment at-will status can be modified only in a written agreement signed by you and the Chief Executive
Officer. 
 By signing this letter, you reaffirm the terms and conditions of the Confidential Information and Inventions Assignment
Agreement, which you signed when you joined the Company. 
 This letter (together with the agreements referenced) is the complete and
exclusive statement of all the terms and conditions of your employment with the Company, and supersedes any prior agreements or representations with regard to your employment. It is entered into without reliance on any promise or representation
other than those expressly contained in this letter, and (except for changes reserved to the Company’s discretion) cannot be modified or amended except in a writing signed by you and a duly authorized member of the Board. This letter is
governed by the laws of California without regard to its conflict-of-laws provisions. 
 Sincerely, 

 

	
	/s/ Evan Spiegel
	Evan Spiegel, Chief Executive Officer








 Accepted and agreed: 
  

	
	Timothy Sehn
	Timothy Sehn
	October 27, 2016
	Date
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00051-CV

Norma GARZA,

Appellant

v.

SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-CI-12912

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED 

and this appeal is DISMISSED.

We ORDER that appellee San Antonio Water System recover its costs of this appeal from 

appellant Norma Garza. 

SIGNED September 25, 2013.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
§ 102-79.90 What criteria must Executive agencies consider when evaluating antenna siting requests? When evaluating antenna siting requests, Executive agencies must consider issues such as— ( a ) Public health and safety with respect to the antenna installation and maintenance;
( b ) Aesthetics;
( c ) Effects on historic districts, sites, buildings, monuments, structures, or other objects pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and implementing regulations;
( d ) Protection of natural and cultural resources (e.g., National Parks and Wilderness areas, National Wildlife Refuge systems);
( e ) Compliance with the appropriate level of review and documentation as necessary under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and implementing regulations of each Federal department and agency responsible for the antenna siting project, and the Federal Aviation Administration, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and other relevant departments and agencies;
( f ) Compliance with the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) guidelines for radiofrequency exposure, ET Docket No. 93-62, entitled “Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation,” issued August 1, 1996, and any other order on reconsideration relating to radiofrequency guidelines and their enforcement. These are updated guidelines for meeting health concerns that reflect the latest scientific knowledge in this area, and are supported by Federal health and safety agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration; and
( g ) Any requirements of the Federal agency managing the facility, FCC, Federal Aviation Administration, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and other relevant departments and agencies. To the maximum extent practicable, when placing antennas for the provision of telecommunication services to the Federal Government, agencies should use redundant and physically separate entry points into the building and physically diverse local network facilities in accordance with guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget. In addition, the National Capital Planning Commission should be consulted for siting requests within the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
EXHIBIT 13.1

RULE 13a-14(b) CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code ) each of the undersigned officers of National Grid plc, a public limited company incorporated
under the laws of England and Wales (the Company), hereby certifies to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ending 31 March 2017 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: 6 June 2017 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ John Pettigrew     
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | John Pettigrew         
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive 
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | National Grid plc      
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: 6 June 2017 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Andrew Bonfield    
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Andrew Bonfield        
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Title: Finance Director
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | National Grid plc
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15595]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service's National Handbook of Conservation Practices

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, New York State Office.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the NRCS National 
Handbook of Conservation Practices, Section IV of the New York State 
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRCS to issue a revised conservation 
practice standard in its National Handbook of Conservation Practices. 
This revised standard is: Streambank and Shoreline Protection (NY580).

DATES: Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing on June 
21, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquire in writing to Richard D. 
Swenson, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 
(NRCS), 441 S. Salina Street, Fifth Floor, Suite 354, Syracuse, New 
York, 13202-2450.
    A copy of this standard is available from the above individual.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agricultural 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State Technical Guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS 
will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that 
period a determination will be made by the NRCS regarding disposition 
of those comments and a final determination of change will be made.

    Dated: June 6, 2000.
Richard D. Swenson,
State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 
Syracuse, NY.
[FR Doc. 00-15595 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-U
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 793

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt licensed funeral

directors and licensed embalmers from the minimum wage and overtime

compensation requirements of that Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. TALENT, Mrs. FOWLER, Mrs.

MYRICK, and Mr. METCALF) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt

licensed funeral directors and licensed embalmers from

the minimum wage and overtime compensation requirements of that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LICENSED FUNERAL DIRECTORS.

4 Section 13(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of

5 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(a)) is amended by striking the pe6 riod at the end of paragraph (17) and inserting ‘‘; or’’

7 and by adding after paragraph (17) the following:
2

•HR 793 IH

1 ‘‘(18) any employee employed as a licensed fu2 neral director or a licensed embalmer.’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Nutrition Study Section, June 19, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to June 20, 2000, 4 p.m. Delta Chelsea Hotel, 33 Gerrard Street, West Toronto, Ontario, ON 000000 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 7, 2000, 65 FR 36156-36159.                

The starting time of the meeting has been changed to 8 a.m. The meeting dates and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 14, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-15749 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 102-118.610 Is a TSP notified when GSA allows a claim?

Yes, the GSA Transportation Audits Division will acknowledge each payable claim using GSA Form 7931, Certificate of Settlement. The certificate will give a complete explanation of any amount that is disallowed. GSA will forward the certificate to the agency whose funds are to be charged for processing and payment.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32326, May 31, 2022]
SERVED: December 28, 2011 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS - -(V'V'rjpgiMlOr' 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

)FFICE OF HEARING 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1122 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 20 lOSW 190072) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

^Tonnie A. Joder 

Chief Administrative L ^ Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-1122 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Jennifer E. Trock, Respondent's Counsel 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

2300 N Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 2003 7-1122 

TEL: 202-663-8000 

FAX: 202-663-8007 

Annjenet Chermault, Claimant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5071 

FAX: 817-222-5092/5946 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Honeywell

101 Columbia Road
Morristown, NJ 07962

Ms. Cindy Newberg Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

MC 6205J Washington, DC 20460

Monday, June 13th, 2011

Subject: SNAP EPA-HQ-OAR 2008-0664 HFO-1 234yf LGWP MAC Refrigerant Packaging

Dear Ms. Newberg

Thank you for taking time this morning to discuss the HFO-1234yf SNAP Final Rule as it pertains to packaged cylinders and va lves/fittings. It is our common under standing that the EPA Final Rule and SAE J639 and J2844 standards relate only to new pa ssenger vehicle mobile air conditioning systems professional service, and not industri al transactions such as: internal inventory management and transfer, bulk packaging for OEM customers related to initial vehicl e fill, and/or other industrial development activities.

For cylinder sizes less than 50 pounds, Honeywell proposes the adoption of the Compressed Gas Association (CGA) 166 fitting, a 1.2” ACME Left Handed thread. This fitting has been approved by CGA, and the automotive industry through SAE Internatio nal’s ICCC J-standa rds committees. The SAE J2844 specification is currently being revised to accept the CGA 166 fitting and will be sent for balloting.

For cylinders greater than 50 lbs, Honeywell proposes the adoption of t he CGA 670 fitting, DIA 1.0” Left Hand Thread. Cylinders greater than 450 kg , including ISO’s have industrial fittings.

To clarify the EPA’s position regard ing cylinder sizes and fittings, could you please issue a determination regarding the following:

• Minimum cylinder size acceptable for Mobile Air Conditioning professional service applications?

• Maximum cylinder size considered MAC professional service?

• Please clarify that cylinders utilized for OEM deliveries, industrial transfer, or other developmental activities are excluded from the requirements of the SNAP Final Rule.

Thank you for your assistance, please contact me if you require any additional information 973-455-2956

Best Regards

Kenneth Horen Commercial DevelopmentHoneywell International 101 Columbia Road, NIC-5 Morristown, NJ 07962

Kenneth.Horen@Honeywell.com
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 851

To require the Federal Communications Commission to establish improved

predictive models for determining the availability of television broadcast

signals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Mr. TAUZIN (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. DINGELL, Mr.

OXLEY, Mr. UPTON, Mr. GILLMOR, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. STEARNS, Mr.

LARGENT, Mr. PICKERING, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. HILL of Montana, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. HILLEARY, Mr. JOHN, Mr. GOSS, and

Mr. BOEHLERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of

the committee concerned

A BILL

To require the Federal Communications Commission to establish improved predictive models for determining the

availability of television broadcast signals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Our Satellites

5 Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 851 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION RULE2 MAKING REQUIRED.

3 Title I of the Communications Act of 1934 is amend4 ed by inserting after section 11 (47 U.S.C. 161) the fol5 lowing new section:

6 ‘‘SEC. 12. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION RULE7 MAKING REQUIRED.

8 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF IMPROVED PREDICTIVE

9 MODELS REQUIRED.—Within 90 days after the date of

10 enactment of this section, the Commission shall establish

11 different predictive models for making determinations of

12 the boundaries of areas within the predicted Grade B Con13 tour of television broadcast stations for purposes of this

14 Act and for purposes of other Federal statutes and regula15 tions. Such models shall include a model based on one of

16 the models described in the Commission’s report and order

17 adopted February 2, 1999 (CS Docket 98–201).

18 ‘‘(b) TREATMENT AS UNSERVED HOUSEHOLD.—Any

19 subscriber who on February 24, 1999, is receiving from

20 a satellite carrier for private home viewing secondary

21 transmissions of programming contained in a primary

22 transmission made by a network station shall, during the

23 period beginning February 24, 1999, and until the Com24 mission completes the action required by subsection (a),

25 be treated as residing in an unserved household for pur26 poses of section 119 of title 17, United States Code.
3

•HR 851 IH

1 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—The terms used in this section

2 have the meanings provided by section 119(d) of title 17,

3 United States Code.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|March 20, 2007 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                                     
|-------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|               | Marc N. Teal                                         
|               | (Principal Financial Officer), BCTC IV Assignor Corp.
|               |
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 660

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 21, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

For the private relief of Ruth Hairston by waiver of a

filing deadline for appeal from a ruling relating to her

application for a survivor annuity.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 660 RFS

1 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF DEADLINE FOR APPEAL.

2 For purposes of a petition by Mrs. Ruth Hairston

3 for review of the final order issued October 31, 1995, by

4 the Merit Systems Protection Board with respect to its

5 docket number SF–0831–95–0754–I–1, the 30-day filing

6 deadline in section 7703(b)(1) of title 5, United States

7 Code, is waived.

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.