alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
David Brymer, Director 

Air Quality Division 

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 

P.O. Box 13087 

Austin, TX 78711 

Dear Mr. Brymer: 

Thank you for the recommendations regarding the attainment status of selected areas in Texas under the 

2010 sulfur dioxide (S02) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) that your agency sent to us on 

September 18, 2015. As you know, we are subject to a March 2, 2015, court order directing us to 

promulgate S02 designations for these areas under section 107 of the Clean Air Act by July 2, 2016. 

Specifically, we are required to promulgate designations for these areas because they contain sources 

meeting the S02 emissions criteria identified in the consent decree. The information you provided on 

September 18, 2015, will greatly help us meet this duty, and ensure protection of public health in Texas. 

In addition to the information you have provided, we have recently received modeling and related 

information from the Sierra Club that is relevant to a subset of the areas to be addressed by July 2, 2016. 

In your state, we have received information pertinent to the area near to the following power plants: W 

A Parish Electric Generating Station; Limestone Generating Station; Big Brown Steam Electric Station; 

Martin Lake Electrical Station; and Monticello Steam Electric Station. We are enclosing a compact disc 

that contains this information. Please let us know if you have any questions about the information we 

have received or if you need any additional information. 

I am writing to solicit your review of the information that Sierra Club has provided, so that the EPA can 

base its designation decisions on the best available information. The Clean Air Act provides for 

designations to be developed through a partnership of state agencies and the EPA; however, we also 

believe it is important to consider significant and relevant information that members of the public 

provide to us. Consistent with the structure of the Clean Air Act, we believe that the best first step in 

addressing this information would be for your agency to provide its review of this information. Since the 

Sierra Club's recommendation differs from your recommendation, we would welcome your commentary 

generally on the information as well as your detailed review of the elements of Sierra Club's analysis. 

To the extent practicable, we would appreciate quantitative comparisons of data used in Sierra Club's 

analysis compared to the data used in your analysis, to help us evaluate the elements ofthe two analyses. 

We would appreciate your review of Sierra Club's information by November 17, 2015. Your timely 

review would provide us valuable assistance in our review of your designation recommendations and 

development of our intended designations, which we are aiming to complete by the end of January 2016. 

Internet Address (URL) • http:/twww.epa.gov/region6 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
Enclosure: cd 

{/Lf

 

Guy Donaldson Chief 

Air Planning Section
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. ER00-2735-000] 

Take notice that on June 6, 2000, New England Power Pool Participants Committee tendered for filing revisions to Appendix 5-E of Market Rule 5. On June 8, 2000, the New England Power Pool Participants Committee tendered for filing corrections to its June 6, 2000 filing in the above-referenced docket. 

The NEPOOL Participants Committee states that copies of these materials were sent to the New England state governors and regulatory commissions and the Participants in the New England Power Pool. 

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 19, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 

David P. Boergers,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-15250 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-U
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 840

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit the admission

to the United States of nonimmigrant students and visitors who are

the spouses and children of United States permanent resident aliens,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit

the admission to the United States of nonimmigrant

students and visitors who are the spouses and children

of United States permanent resident aliens, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 840 IH

1 SECTION 1. ADMISSION OF CERTAIN ‘‘B’’ AND ‘‘F’’ VISA NON2 IMMIGRANTS WHO ARE SPOUSES OR CHIL3 DREN OF UNITED STATES PERMANENT RESI4 DENT ALIENS.

5 Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

6 (8 U.S.C. 1182) is amended by adding at the end thereof

7 the following new subsection:

8 ‘‘(r)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law,

9 no alien—

10 ‘‘(A) who is—

11 ‘‘(i) the spouse or child of an alien lawfully

12 admitted for permanent residence to the United

13 States; and

14 ‘‘(ii) not eligible to enter the United States

15 as an immigrant except by reason of being such

16 a spouse or child; and

17 ‘‘(B) who seeks admission to the United States

18 for purposes of visiting the permanent resident

19 spouse or parent or for studying in the United

20 States; and

21 ‘‘(C) who is otherwise qualified;

22 may be denied issuance of a visa, or may be denied admis23 sion to the United States, as a nonimmigrant alien de24 scribed in section 101(a)(15)(B) who is coming to the

25 United States temporarily for pleasure or as a non26 immigrant alien described in section 101(a)(15)(F).
3

•HR 840 IH

1 ‘‘(2) Whenever an alien described in paragraph (1)

2 seeks admission to the United States as a nonimmigrant

3 alien described in section 101(a)(15)(B) who is coming

4 temporarily for pleasure or as a nonimmigrant alien de5 scribed in section 101(a)(15)(F), the fact that a petition

6 has been filed on the alien’s behalf for classification of

7 the alien as an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi8 dence shall not constitute evidence of the alien’s intention

9 to abandon his or her foreign residence.’’.

Æ
#### § 102-118.25 What must my agency provide to GSA regarding its transportation policies?

As part of the evaluation of agencies' transportation program and postpayment audit, GSA may request to examine your agency's transportation prepayment audit program and policies to verify the performance of the prepayment audit. GSA Office of Government-wide Policy, Transportation Policy Division and GSA Transportation Audits Division may suggest revisions of agencies' audit program or policies.

[81 FR 65299, Sept. 22, 2016]
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No.  333-80450 and  333-91863) and Forms S-3 (File Nos.
033-99736-01,  333-03526-01, 333-39365-01 and 333-61394-01) of Tanger Properties
Limited Partnership of our reports dated March 5, 2004 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 10, 2004
#### § 302-3.203 If I am transferring in the interest of the Government and my employed immediate family member(s) transfer is not in the interest of the Government, will those immediate family member(s) receive relocation allowances?

Yes, your employed immediate family member(s) whose transfer is not in the interest of the Government will receive relocation allowances, but solely as a member of your immediate family.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12254, Feb. 16, 2024]
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.21 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

For additional information, see related documents published at 47 FR 57369, Dec. 23, 1982, 48 FR 17101, Apr. 21, 1983, and 48 FR 29096, June 24, 1983.

#### § 101-6.2103 What programs and activities of GSA are subject to these regulations?

The Administrator publishes in the Federal Register a list of GSA's programs and activities that are subject to these regulations.
172P15-4

#### State v. Mohammed Nadder Jilani

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

1. Dismissed 11/25/2015

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Habeas Corpus*

2. Denied 11/26/2015
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Randy Lubinsky, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of PainCare Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 19, 2004



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Randy Lubinsky                     
|Randy Lubinsky, Chief Executive Officer
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

197 

CA 14-00716 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

 

GLADYS LAVERDI AND FRANCIS M. LAVERDI, 

PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, 

V ORDER

ARONA S. BAKER AND PATRICK L. EMMERLING, 

EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF BERNICE E. BAKER, 

DECEASED, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

LAW OFFICES OF WAYNE C. FELLE, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (ELIZABETH A. BRUCE

OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. 

BURGIO, KITA, CURVIN & BANKER, BUFFALO (STEVEN P. CURVIN OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F.

O’Donnell, J.), entered November 13, 2013 in a personal injury action. 

The order granted the motion of defendants for an open commission and

letters rogatory for the deposition of Kathryn R. Wilkins, M.D., a

nonparty witness. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### § 102-75.930 What happens if there is no objection by an appropriate committee or subcommittee of Congress concerning the proposed negotiated sale?

If there is no objection, the disposal agency may consummate the sale on or after 35 days from the date the Administrator of General Services transmitted the explanatory statement to the committees. If there is an objection, the disposal agency must resolve objections with the appropriate Congressional committee or subcommittee before consummating the sale.
No. 11-9267.

#### Garcia *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

HOMESTEAD HOSPITAL, INC., BAPTIST HEALTH

SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., PARAGON CONTRACTING

SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a TEAMHEALTH FLORIDA, and

HEALTHCARE REVENUE RECOVERY GROUP, LLC, 

d/b/a HRRG, ARS ACCOUNT RESOLUTION SERVICES,

 Southern District of Florida

ADISLEN PAZ DEL SOL

 

 BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA, INC. 

 c/o CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY, as Registered Agent 

 1201 HAYS STREET 

 TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301 

Monica Amor, Esq., Amor Law Firm, P.A.

3625 NW 82nd Avenue, Suite 203

Doral, Florida 33166

Tel: (305) 882-2667; Fax: (888) 311-2667

Email: mamor@amorlaw.com

Case 1:22-cv-23684-JAL Document 1-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 1:22-cv-23684-JAL Document 1-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 2 of 2
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

42) IV-E-30 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 9:15:28 AM Sheet 42 of 105 
P.2 

V ~ A-83-27 

TELEPHONE CALL REPORT - INDUSTRIAL BOILER S02 IV-E-30 

DATE: November 4, 1986 

TO: Jim Braden, Plant Manager 

Kentucky Agricultural Energy Corporation 

P. 0. Box 657 

Franklin, KY 42134 

(502) 586-9586 

FROM: J. Thomas Waddell 

SUBJECT: Reliability Information on FBC Units 

Operating problems came from Foster Wheeler's lack of understanding in 

operating and designing the units. Limestone type and characteristics, 

the feed coal (washed vs. unwashed and sulfur content), as well as the 

reinjection system affect FBC unit performance and reliability. Downtime 

has resulted from abrasion and stress failures of the water tubes and from 

stoker jamming or failure. Capacity has been lost because of protecting 

the in-bed tubes from abrasion and changing the hot gas flow path to 

reduce erosion of the generating tubes. The units have been improved to 

about 85% reliability during the last year. 
P.3 

KENTUCKY AGRICULTURAL ENERGY CORPORATION 

Power Alcohol • DDGS • Grain 

July 10, 1987 

Mr. J. Thomas Waddell 

Chemical Engineer 

Radian Corporation 

Progress Center 

P. 0. Box 13000 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 

Dear Mr. Waddell: 

This will acknowledge your letter of June 29, 1987 enclosing a copy of 

the telephone call report between yourself and Mr. Jim Braden of 

November 4, 1986. We have reviewed the report and attached are our 

comments regarding the reliability information on FBC units. 

Mr. Braden is no longer with KAEC; therefore, if you have any questions, 

please direct them to Mr. Dewey Marsee, KAEC's Plant Manager. 

Sincerely, 

Vt/J*^ 

pjack N. Wade 

President 

/pl-JNW-87-59 

Attachment 

Post Office Box 657, Franklin, Kentucky 42134 502-586-9586
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, James M.Fornear, Chief Financial Officer of AML Communications Inc., (the “Company),certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of AML Communications, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 26, 2006
| /s/ JAMES M. FORNEAR     |
|--------------------------|
| James M. Fornear,        |
| Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
Order entered December 1 3 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 16 - 01010 - CV No. 05 - 16 - 01033 - CV No. 05 - 16 - 01034 - CV No. 05 - 16 - 01035 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF S .N., JR., S .M., H.E., AND K.E., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . DF - 11 - 18595 - U , DF - 15 - 06055 - U, DF - 15 - 02203 - U, DF - 15 - 13084 - U 

### O RDER Before the Court is the S tate’s December 8 , 2016 motion for an ex tension of time to file S tate’s brief

. We GRANT the S tate’s motion

. We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the S tate ’s brief tendered as of the date of this order. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE