alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10930

TRIPLE TEE GOLF, INC., a Florida Corporation,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation; 

TOM STITES & ASSOCIATES, INC., 

Doing Business as Impact Golf Technologies, Inc.; 

JOHN THOMAS STITES, III, Also Known as Tom Stites,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 4:04-CV-302

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 11, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10930

2

In this suit for misappropriation of trade secrets and for damages under

the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, the district court, on remand, granted

summary judgment by determining that plaintiff Triple Tee Golf, Inc., never received a right to sue on the claim at issue and was not a “consumer” under the

state statute. We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record

and have heard the arguments of counsel. We find no reversible error. The

judgment, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-285   -      -CV

IN RE JASON LOBAN	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered rrRrelator Jason Loban and real r party in interest the Grapevine City Attorney’s joint petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, tehthe appartierelator’s’ joint petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL  B:    WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED:    August 212, 2007
#### § 105-60.305 Unusual circumstances.

Whenever GSA cannot meet the statutory time limit for processing a request because of “unusual circumstances,” as defined at 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(iii), GSA shall, before expiration of the 20-day statutory time period to respond to a request for records, notify the requester in writing of the unusual circumstances involved and of the date by which GSA estimates the processing of the request shall be completed. Where the extension of time is anticipated to exceed 10 business days, GSA shall provide the requester with an opportunity to modify the request or arrange an alternative time period for processing the original or modified request. GSA shall make available its FOIA Public Liaison for this purpose. GSA shall also alert requesters to the availability of the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) to provide dispute resolution services.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Request ID: 1038473 Report Code: AMP480 Nov. 28, 2012

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: FHC

State County City Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

36

36

36

027

071

079

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

DESIGN VALUE 44201

SELECTED OPTIONS

USER SITE METADATA

MERGE PDF FILES

QUARTERLY DATA IN WORKFILE

WORKFILE DELIMITER

SINGLE EVENT PROCESSING

Option Type Option Value

STREET ADDRESS

YES

NO

,

EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

GLOBAL DATES

2011

Start Date End Date

2011

Tribal

Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS

Standard Description

Ozone 8-Hour 2008
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Nov. 28, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 1 of 1

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

Level:.075

NAAQS Standard: Ozone 8-Hour 2008

Statistic: Annual 4th Maximum

1

1

1

Poc

190

207

200

Valid

Days

 89

 97

 93

Percent

Complete

 .072

 .067

 .068

4th

Max Cert

209

206

210

Valid

Days

 98

 96

 98

Percent

Complete

 .076

 .075

 .077

4th

Max Cert

212

206

210

Valid

Days

 99

 96

 98

Percent

Complete

 .068

 .066

 .070

4th

Max Cert

 95

 96

 97

Percent

Complete

 .072

 .069

 .071

Design

Value

Y

Y

Y

D. V.

Validity

Ozone(44201)

Parts per million(007)

Site ID

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

36-027-0007

36-071-5001

36-079-0005

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

Design Value Year: 2011

STREET ADDRESS

2010 2009

Tribe: New York

Forest Road, VILLAGE OF 

MILLBROOK, Inst of 

Ecosystem Studies

1175 ROUTE 17K, 

MONTGOMERY Valley Central

HS

NYSDEC FIELD HQTRS GYPSY

TRAIL ROAD

2011 3 - Year
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO. 22-cv-24022-BB 

NINGBO YONGJIA AIDUO 

AUTO PARTS MANU CO., LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED 

ON SCHEDULE “A”, 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AS TO CERTAIN DEFENDANTS ONLY 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and by 

undersigned counsel, Plaintiff hereby voluntarily dismisses without prejudice all claims 

against the following Defendants: 

ASTROAI CORPORATION (Defendant No. 3 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint) 

paytoolittle (Defendant No. 47 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint) 

BIRDROCK HOME (Defendant No. 56 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint) 

Respectfully submitted on this 6rd day of February, 2023. 

LAW FIRM OF RUBIO & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

8950 SW 74 Ct., Suite 1804 

Miami, Fl 33156 

Telephone: (786) 220-2061 

Facsimile: (786) 220-2062 

Email: hrubio@rubiolegal.com 

Email: frubio@rubiolegal.com 

Email: apuentes@rubiolegal.cm 

Email: info@rubiolegal.com 

Case 1:22-cv-24270-DPG Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2 

 

By:/s/ Humberto Rubio 

Humberto Rubio, Jr., Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 36433 

Felipe Rubio, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 123059 

M. Arabella Puentes, Esq 

Florida Bar No. 26825 

Case 1:22-cv-24270-DPG Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
IB

Union Calendar No. 29

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 774

[Report No. 106–47]

To amend the Small Business Act to change the conditions of participation

and provide an authorization of appropriations for the women’s business

center program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Mr. TALENT, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mrs.

KELLY, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mrs. BONO, Mr. PASCRELL, Mrs. CHRISTIANCHRISTENSEN, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, and Mr. HINOJOSA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small

Business

MARCH 10, 1999

Additional sponsor: Mr. UDALL of New Mexico

MARCH 10, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To amend the Small Business Act to change the conditions

of participation and provide an authorization of appropriations for the women’s business center program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 774 RH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Business

3 Center Amendments Act of 1999’’.

4 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION.

5 Section 29(c)(1) of the Small Business Act (15

6 U.S.C. 656(c)(1)) is amended—

7 (1) in subparagraph (A) by inserting ‘‘and’’

8 after the semicolon at the end; and

9 (2) by striking subparagraphs (B) and (C) and

10 inserting the following:

11 ‘‘(B) in the third, fourth, and fifth years,

12 1 non-Federal dollar for each Federal dollar.’’.

13 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

14 Section 29(k)(1) of the Small Business Act (15

15 U.S.C. 656(k)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘8,000,000’’

16 and inserting ‘‘11,000,000’’.

Union Calendar No. 29

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 774

[Report No. 106–47]

A BILL

To amend the Small Business Act to change the

business center program.thorization of appropriations for the women’sconditions of participation and provide an auMARCH 10, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 22, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 130673 & (47) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130673 COA: 258961 Kent CC: 03-007770-FC EDWARD JOHNIGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to a ppeal the January 13, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not p ersuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0321 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 22, 2006

Clerk
22-cr-80185-Rosenberg/Reinhart

SP Nov 30, 2022 West Palm Beach

Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 1 of 10
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 2 of 10
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 3 of 10
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 4 of 10
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 5 of 10
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 6 of 10
22-cr-80185-Rosenberg/Reinhart

Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 7 of 10
22-cr-80185-Rosenberg/Reinhart

Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 8 of 10
22-cr-80185-Rosenberg/Reinhart

Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 9 of 10
AO 455 (Rev. 01/09) Waiver of an Indictment

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

v. Case No.

Defendant

WAIVER OF AN INDICTMENT

I understand that I have been accused of one or more offenses punishable by imprisonment for more than one

year. I was advised in open court of my rights and the nature of the proposed charges against me.

After receiving this advice, I waive my right to prosecution by indictment and consent to prosecution by

information.

Date:

Defendant’s signature

Signature of defendant’s attorney

Printed name of defendant’s attorney

Judge’s signature

Judge’s printed name and title

 Southern District of Florida

ELIZABETH GENNA SUAREZ,

f/k/a Elizabeth Mirson Suit

12/01/2022

Gregg S. Lerman, Esq.

Hon. Ryon M. McCabe, U.S. Magistrate Judge

22-cr-80185-Rosenberg/Reinhart

Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 10 of 10
EX-10.1



 EXHIBIT 10.1 

EXTENSION AGREEMENT 
 Citibank Europe PLC,
UK Branch, as Administrative Agent 
     for the Lenders party to the Credit Agreement 

    referred to below 
  

Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Each of the undersigned
Lenders (each such Lender, an “Extending Lender”) hereby agrees to extend, effective 7 February 2017, its Commitment and the Maturity Date under the Credit Agreement, dated as of 12 February 2013 (as amended or modified
from time to time, the “Credit Agreement,” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among Philip Morris International Inc. (“PMI”), the Lenders party thereto and Citibank Europe PLC, UK
Branch (legal successor to Citibank International Limited), as Administrative Agent, for an additional 364-day period to 6 February 2018 pursuant to Section 2.19 of the Credit Agreement. 

Except as expressly provided hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Credit Agreement are and shall remain in full force and effect and
are hereby ratified and confirmed. 
 This Extension Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State
of New York. This Extension Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 

[Signature pages omitted]
No. 10-10958.

#### Summers *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NO. SCPW-12-0000472
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

CHRIS GRINDLING, Petitioner,

vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Chris Grindling's petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that HRS § 831-3.2(a) does not permit expungement of petitioner's records of arrest for: (1) HRS § 804-7.2 and HRS § 706-626, which are not crimes; (2) HRS § 291C-85 and HRS § 291C-166, which are violations for which petitioner was found guilty; and (3) HRS § 708-826 for which "no disposition could be found." It further appears that HRS § 831-3.2(a)(2) does not permit expungement of petitioner's record of arrest for HRS § 329C-2 until after August 30, 2012. It finally appears that petitioner provides no proof of a written application to the Attorney General for expungement of the record of arrest for HRS § 710-1077. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to mandamus relief. See HRS § 831-3.2(a); Kema v. Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000472 17-MAY-2012 02:42 PM2

Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.); In re Disciplinary Bd. of Hawaii Supreme Court, 91 Hawai # i 363, 368, 984 P.2d 688, 693 (1999) (Mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available.). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 17, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
No. 11-8066.

No. 11-8067.

No. 11-8068.

No. 11-8481.

#### Gibson *v.*United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri; McCorkle *v.*United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri; Watkins *v.*United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri; and Goldblatt v. United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cér-tiorari denied.
§ 101-39.208 Vehicles removed from defined areas. ( a ) Normally, vehicles shall not be permanently operated outside the geographical area served by the issuing GSA IFMS fleet management center. However, when agency programs necessitate vehicle relocation for a period exceeding 90 calendar days, the agency shall notify the issuing GSA IFMS fleet management center of the following: ( 1 ) The location at which the vehicles are currently in use;
( 2 ) The date the vehicles were moved to the present location; and
( 3 ) The expected date the vehicles will be returned to the original location.
( b ) When vehicles will be permanently relocated outside the area served by the issuing GSA IFMS fleet management center, the affected GSA IFMS fleet manager will ascertain if the using agency is fully participating at the new location (see § 101-39.204). If this criterion is met, the vehicle will normally be transferred to the GSA IFMS fleet management center nearest the new location. If the agency is other than a full participant, the transfer will be treated as a request for additional vehicles at the new location.
[56 FR 59890, Nov. 26, 1991]
§ 101-30.603 GSA Supply Catalog. ( a ) The GSA Supply Catalog is an illustrated catalog, published annually, which serves as the primary source to identify and order centrally managed, stocked, and issued items available from GSA supply facilities. The catalog also provides information concerning other Federal Supply Service programs and GSA services.
( b ) The GSA Supply Catalog contains all necessary information for ordering from the GSA Federal Supply Service stock program and basic information, such as: ( 1 ) *Alphabetical Index.* This index is organized alphabetically by approved item names under the basic noun name in inverted word sequence, (i.e. sofa, sleeper) with reference to the page that contains the pertinent item description.
( 2 ) *Item Descriptions/Ordering Data.* Item descriptions are listed by commodity groups in this section. Included also are descriptive and ordering data with representative illustrations for selected common-use items that are centrally managed, stocked, and issued from GSA supply facilities.
( 3 ) *National Stock Number Index.* This NSN sequenced index lists items that are centrally managed, stocked, and issued from GSA supply facilities.
( 4 ) *Narrative.* The narrative includes comprehensive detailed information to use and understand the GSA Federal Supply Service stock program.
( 5 ) *Other Federal Supply Service sales programs and GSA services.* This section provides to user agencies pertinent information regarding the use and understanding of the GSA Federal Supply Service stock program, sales program, and other GSA services.
( c ) Changes to the GSA Supply Catalog are effected by change bulletins issued during April, July, and October. These are cumulative publications that contain information pertaining to new items, changes to supply management data, and deleted items.
( d ) Special Notice to Ordering Office is issued on a nonscheduled basis as required by the Commissioner, FSS, to inform agencies of significant program changes to the GSA Supply Catalog.
[46 FR 35646, July 10, 1981]
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF
PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, David W. Dorman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004
          (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AT&T Corp.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 4, 2004

| |  | /s/   David W. Dorman
       David W. Dorman
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
PATRICK

### J. HACKETT Of Counsel 

## WILLIAM 

# P. CALLAHAN ATTORNEY AT LAW

December 17th, 2014 U. S. Department ofTransportation Docket ManagementSystem 1200 NewJerseyAve., SE Washington, DC 20590 515 MADISON AVENUE SUITE 2304 NEW YORK, NY 10022 212.889.3000 c_; FAX: 212.889.3242 E-MAIL: WILLCALL66@GMAIL.COM

CHINA IPWELL INTERNATIONAL LAW FIRM 988 DINGXI ROAD SHANGHAI CHINA (86 21) 6212 5577-8844 FAX: (86 21) 6212 5089 5618



### Re: Southgate Films, Inc- Petitionfor 333 Exemption- Request for Confidentiality
To Whom It May Concern: This is a follow-up letterto advise yesterday, this office filed on behalf ofour below client, a petition for exemption under Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. The name and address ofthe applicant is: SouthGate Films, Inc. President Paul Callahan

.67 West Street, Suite 605

Brooklyn, NY 11222 Email: paul@southgatefilms.com Phone: 347-489-7890 r\

..

### >· The following has been submitted via post confidentially to supplementthis

### public'~lectronic petition: SouthGate Film's UAS Models/Specs, UAS component manuals, South Gate Film's safety manual and certificate of liability insurance. In addition, the exhibits enclosed herewith are marked Confidential pursuantto 14 CFR 11.35 (b) as these manuals contain information proprietary tothe applicantwhich has not and will not be shared with others. The manual contains operating conditions and procedures not available tothe public and are protected from release under 5 USC 552 et.seq ofthe Freedom of Information Act. 

### Exhibits Access To access the corresponding exhibits for the Section 333 Petition from SouthGate Films, Inc., please go tothe URL Below:Ifyou have any trouble accessing these**do~uments,** please contact Counsel for SouthGate Films, Inc. (Law Offices ofWilliam P. Callahan) at212-889-3000 or via email at willcall66@gmail.com

Thank you for your attention to this enclosure request.

William P. Callahan, Esq.
§ 109-40.302 Standard routing principle. ( a ) Shipments shall be routed using the mode of transportation, or individual carriers within the mode, that can provide the required service at the lowest overall delivered cost to the Government.
( b ) When more than one mode of transportation, or more than one carrier within a mode, can provide equally satisfactory service at the same overall cost the traffic shall be distributed as equitably as practicable among the modes and among the carriers within the modes.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 560

To designate the Federal building located at 300 Recinto Sur Street in

Old San Juan, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Jose ́ V. Toledo United States

Post Office and Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO ́ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 300 Recinto

Sur Street in Old San Juan, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Jose ́

V. Toledo United States Post Office and Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 300 Recinto Sur

5 Street in Old San Juan, Puerto Rico, shall be known and

6 designated as the ‘‘Jose ́ V. Toledo United States Post Of7 fice and Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 560 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Jose ́ V. Toledo United States Post Of6 fice and Courthouse’’.

Æ
# Comments on: 21-2080: FLEMING v. MSPB [OPINION], Nonprecedential