alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM 

GRACE, INC.; ENGAGE MIAMI, INC.; 

SOUTH DADE BRANCH OF THE NAACP; 

MIAMI-DADE BRACH OF THE NAACP; 

CLARICE COOPER; YANELIS VALDES; 

JARED JOHNSON; and ALEXANDER 

CONTRERAS, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF MIAMI, 

 Defendant. 

 / 

NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Defendant, CITY OF MIAMI, hereby appeals to the 

United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit the Order by the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Florida (ECF 94) entered on July 30, 2023 sustaining objections 

to the CITY OF MIAMI’s Notice of Passage of Redistricting Plan. (“Notice”)(ECF 77) that had 

been adopted pursuant to the Court Order (ECF 60) entered on May 23, 2023, adopting the Report 

and Recommendation (ECF 52) and issuing a preliminary injunction, the Honorable Kevin 

Michael Moore presiding. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 By: s/ Christopher N. Johnson 

GRAYROBINSON, P.A. 

Jason L. Unger, Esquire 

Florida Bar No. 991562 

George T. Levesque 

Florida Bar No. 55551 

Andy Bardos 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2023 Page 1 of 3
CASE NO. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM 

2 

Florida Bar No. 822671 

301 S. Bronough Street 

Suite 600 

Tallahassee, Florida 32301 

Telephone: (850) 577-9090 

Facsimile: (850) 577-3311 

GRAYROBINSON, P.A.

Christopher N. Johnson 

 Florida Bar No. 69329 

Email: Christopher.Johnson@gray-robinson.com 

Marlene Quintana, B.C.S. 

Florida Bar No. 88358 

Email: Marlene.Quintana@gray-robinson.com 

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 3200 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 416-6880 

Facsimile: (305) 416-6887 

CITY OF MIAMI 

VICTORIA MÉNDEZ, City Attorney 

Florida Bar No. 194931 

JOHN A. GRECO, Chief Deputy City Attorney 

Florida Bar No. 991236 

KEVIN R. JONES, Deputy City Attorney 

Florida Bar No. 119067 

KERRI L. MCNULTY, 

Litigation & Appeals Division Chief 

Florida Bar No. 16171 

Office of the City Attorney 

444 S.W. 2nd Avenue 

Miami, FL 33130 

Telephone: (305) 416-1800 

Facsimile: (305) 416-1801 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2023 Page 2 of 3
CASE NO. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM 

3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on July 30, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 

Court by using the CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all

counsel of record or pro se parties either via transmission of Notice of Electronic Filing generated by 

CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to 

receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. 

 By: s/ Christopher N. Johnson 

Christopher N. Johnson, Esq. 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2023 Page 3 of 3
NO. 07-03-0079-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	AUGUST 22, 2003

	______________________________

	JAMES WARREN BRIGHT, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 16,336; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ, and BOYD, S.J.1

	Appellant brought this appeal from an order of the trial court denying his motion for appointment of counsel pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to aid him in his proceeding seeking DNA testing.  On May 29, 2003, this court entered its order abating the appeal and remanding the matter to the trial court for the purpose of determining if appellant was indigent and thus entitled to the furnishing of a clerk’s record and the appointment of an attorney.

	We have been advised that the trial court has now found appellant to be indigent and appointed an attorney to represent him on the DNA application.  Thus, the relief for which appellant sought and was initially denied, has now been afforded him.  This appeal has now become moot.

	Accordingly, the appeal is now reinstated and because of its mootness, must be, and is hereby, dismissed. 

							John T. Boyd

							Senior Justice

Do not publish.
§ 109-1.5101 Official use of personal property. Personal property shall be used only in the performance of official work of the United States Government, except: ( a ) In emergencies threatening loss of life or property as authorized by law;
( b ) As otherwise authorized by law and approved by the Office of Management; Program Secretarial Officer (PSO) for their respective organizations; or a contracting officer for contractor-held property.
Exhibit (32)

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of American Greetings
Corporation on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), each of the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American Greetings Corporation.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

July 9, 2008



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Zev Weiss                                        
|Zev Weiss                                            
|Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
|                                                     
|/s/ Stephen J. Smith                                 
|Stephen J. Smith                                     
|Senior Vice President and                            
|Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
§ 105-54.308 Responsibilities of the Administrator. The Administrator must ensure: ( a ) Compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act and this chapter;
( b ) Issuance of administrative guidelines and management controls that apply to all advisory committees established or used by the agency;
( c ) Designation of a Committee Management Officer to carry out the functions specified in section 89(b) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act;
( d ) Provision of a written determination stating the reasons for closing any advisory committee meeting to the public;
( e ) A review, at least annually, of the need to continue each existing advisory committee, consistent with the public interest and the purpose and functions of each committee;
( f ) The appointment of a Designated Federal Officer for each advisory committee and its subcommittee;
( g ) The opportunity for reasonable public participation in advisory committee activities; and
( h ) That the number of committee members is limited to the fewest necessary to accomplish committee objectives.
No. 10-11000.

#### Battle *v.*Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Morgan County. Certiorari denied.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD D. HURLES,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

CHARLES L. RYAN,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 08-99032

D.C. No.

CIV-00-0118-PHX-RCB

District of Arizona, 

Phoenix

ORDER

Filed March 19, 2013

Before: Harry Pregerson, Dorothy W. Nelson,

and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The Court takes the respondent’s Motion for Ruling on

Respondent-Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc and

the petitioner’s Motion to remand pursuant to Martinez v.

Ryan, 132 S.Ct. 1309 (2012), under submission. The Court

defers ruling on these motions pending the resolution of

Detrich v. Ryan, No. 08-99001. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4863 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4863

 For the relief of Julian Mart, Paul Mart, Veronica Mart, and Adelina 
                                 Mart.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2000

Ms. Hooley of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 For the relief of Julian Mart, Paul Mart, Veronica Mart, and Adelina 
                                 Mart.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR JULIAN MART, PAUL MART, 
              VERONICA MART, AND ADELINA MART.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Julian Mart, Paul Mart, 
Veronica Mart, and Adelina Mart shall each be eligible for issuance of 
an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 
lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an application 
for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Julian Mart, Paul Mart, Veronica 
Mart, or Adelina Mart enters the United States before the filing 
deadline specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to 
have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 
eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Julian Mart, Paul Mart, 
Veronica Mart, and Adelina Mart, the Secretary of State shall instruct 
the proper officer to reduce by 4, during the current or next following 
fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the aliens' birth under section 
203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the aliens' birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERIC MILLER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 267 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Demarcus Darrelle Jones, * From the County Court

of Eastland County,

Trial Court No. 1900117

Vs. No. 11-20-00082-CR * March 10, 2022

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
§ 101-26.302 Standard and optional forms. Agencies shall obtain Standard and optional forms by requisitioning them from GSA (FSS) unless the forms have been approved by GSA (KMPS) to be stocked and distributed by the promulgating agency or to be reproduced locally. Assistance or information on the forms management program may be obtained by contacting GSA (KMPS), Washington, DC 20405. (See part 201-45, subpart 201-45.5 of this chapter.) ( a ) For purposes of economy, existing stocks are depleted prior to issuance of revisions unless the promulgating agency determines previous editions unusable and obsolete.
( b ) Forms or form assemblies which deviate from the standard and optional forms listed in the GSA Supply Catalog have restricted use and are not stocked. Agencies requiring such forms shall prepare and transmit a Standard Form 1, Printing and Binding Requisition, or Standard Form 1-C, Printing and Binding Requisition for Specialty Items, to the General Services Administration, Federal Supply Service (FCNI), Washington, DC 20406, for review and submission to GPO. Prior approval of GSA (KMPS) is required whenever the content or construction of a form is altered or modified. Requests for such exceptions may be obtained by submission of a SF 152, Requests for Clearance of a Standard or Optional Form or Exception, to GSA (KMPS), with appropriate justification.
( c ) Certain standard forms are serially numbered and are to be accounted for to prevent possible fraudulent use. The General Accounting Office (GAO) requires accurate accountability records to be maintained for such items by applicable agencies. GSA forwards a receipt verification card with each shipment of accountable forms. The receiving agency is responsible for verifying receipt of the serially numbered forms in the shipment by returning the card to the address preprinted on the card. See § 101-41.308 of this chapter for information governing agency control and disposition of unused U.S. Government Bills of Lading (GBL's).
( d ) Standard and optional forms which are excess to the needs of an agency shall be reported to GSA in the same manner as other excess personal property pursuant to part 101-43 of this chapter. Obsolete forms shall be disposed of under the provisions of part 101-45 of this chapter.
[56 FR 12457, Mar. 26, 1991]
#### Spurt Messenger Service, Inc., Respondent, v Lynda Gudde, Respondent, and National Casualty Company, Appellant.

[628 NYS2d 99]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about April 7, 1994, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant-appellant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In light of, *inter alia,*the fact that defendant failed to satisfactorily establish that it would not have issued the instant policy had it been aware of the applicant’s alleged misrepresentations concerning its use of bicycle messengers, summary judgment was properly denied since there is a question as to whether the alleged misrepresentations were material and thus sufficient to void the instant policy *(see, Courtney v Dollar Sav. Bank,*54 AD2d 868, 869). Indeed, defendant insurer failed to provide any evidence of its policy and underwriting practices with respect to applicants whose businesses utilized bicycle messengers *(see, Di Pippo v Prudential Ins. Co.,*88 AD2d 631). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.
#### Harrison W. Stearns et al., appellees, v. National Building, Loan & Protective Union of Minneapolis, appellant.

Filed November 20, 1894.

No. 5737.

Building and Loan Associations: Forfeiture: Cancellation of Mortgages: Foreclosure: Accounting: Payments on Stock. For syllabus see *Randall v. National Building, Loan & Protective Union*42 Neb., 809.

Appeal from the district court of Hall county. Heard below before Harrison, J.

*W, A. Prince*and *George D. Emery,*for appellant.

*M. Randall, contra.*

Irvine, C.

This case is similar in all respects to that of *Randall v. National Building, Loan & Protective Union,*42 Neb., 809, and the decree is for the same reasons

Affirmed.

Harrison, J., not sitting.
#### § 109-40.5002 Applicability.

The policy and procedures set forth in this subpart shall be applied when DOE's cost-type contractors use commercial bills of lading.
#### § 102-75.943 What happens if granting an easement will reduce the value of the property?

If the easement will reduce the property's value, agencies must grant the easement for the amount by which the property's fair market value is decreased unless the agency determines that the Government's best interests are served by granting the easement at either reduced or without monetary or other consideration.
§ 105-68.995 Principal. *Principal* means— ( a ) An officer, director, owner, partner, principal investigator, or other person within a participant with management or supervisory responsibilities related to a covered transaction; or
( b ) A consultant or other person, whether or not employed by the participant or paid with Federal funds, who— ( 1 ) Is in a position to handle Federal funds;
( 2 ) Is in a position to influence or control the use of those funds; or,
( 3 ) Occupies a technical or professional position capable of substantially influencing the development or outcome of an activity required to perform the covered transaction.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cv-62278-ALTMAN/Hunt

HOWARD M. CAPLAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JSE INSURANCE INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [ECF No. 11] pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P

41(a)(1)(A)(i). Being fully advised, the Court hereby ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED with 

prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE

this case. All pending deadlines are TERMINATED, and any pending motions are DENIED as 

moot. 

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 4, 2023.

 ________________________________

 ROY K. ALTMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:22-cv-62278-RKA Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000356

06-FEB-2020

07:54 AM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAW AI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation to 

dismiss the appeal is approved, and the appeal is dismissed with 

prejudice. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and 

costs. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 6, 2020. 

[}p.adld/L 

Associate Judge 

2
J ~g~ ED STq T

, S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
o 

### ~~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

~ ~l ' 9 G PROZ

~ G

~ \ 0 

### J U L 1 6 2013

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION



### J R Stroble, Manager National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090
Dear Mr. Stroble: This letter provides the results of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) continued compliance inspection of the Central Characterization Project (CCP) waste characterization (WC) program for contact-handled (CH) and remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) near ldaho Falls, ID. This inspection occurred on May 7-9, 2013. As a result of this continued compliance inspection, EPA confirms that the CH TRU waste characterization program implemented by the CCP at INL is technically adequate and compliant with 40 CFR 194.24 requirements. The enclosed report (EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49; II-A4- 175) gives the details of the EPA evaluation of the program. EPA initially approved waste characterization activities at INL-CCP for CH waste in November 2005 and for RH waste in January 2007 (RH) (EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49; II-A4-59 and No. A-98-49; II-A4-72). In accordance with 40 CFR 194.8(b), during this on-site inspection, EPA sampled the following TRU waste characterization activities and processes: • Acceptable knowledge (AK) for CH and RH wastes • Nondestructive assay (NDA) systems used for characterizing CH TRU wastes • Dose to Curie process for characterizing RH TRU waste • Real-time radiography (RTR) for RH TRU waste • Visual Examination (VE) for CH TRU waste During the inspection, EPA issued two concerns in the areas of VE and RTR which have been resolved. These are discussed in the enclosed report.

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable * Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperEPA continues to approve CCP's CH and RH TRU WC programs at INL in the configuration

observed during the inspection and operated consistent with the limitations described in the baseline inspection report and subsequent Tier 1 approvals cited in Attachments A.1 and A.2. EPA confirms that INL-CCP has appropriately implemented and informed EPA of Tier 2 changes since August 2006. If you have any questions, please contact Rajani Joglekar (202 343-9462) or Ed Feltcorn (202 343- 9422). Sincerely,

Tom Peake, Director Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Enclosure
cc:electronic distribution Alton Harris, DOE EM Joe Franco, CBFO Norma Casteneda, CBFO Marcus Pinzel, CBFO Ben Robert, DOE ID Jerry Wells, DOE ID Dave Haar, ITG Trais Kliphuis, NMED Site Documents, CBFO/LANL Jon Edwards, EPA
# Comments on: 21-2357: MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L. [OPINION], Precedential
375P09-5

#### State v. Avenger Ridgeway

Defs *Pro Se*Motion for *En Banc*

Dismissed
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  AMREP   Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
the  undersigned  does hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  March 15, 2005

                                                    /s/ Peter M. Pizza
                                                    ------------------
                                                    Peter M. Pizza
                                                    Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                                    /s/ James Wall
                                                    --------------
                                                    James Wall*

                                                    /s/ Michael P. Duloc
                                                    --------------------
                                                    Michael P. Duloc*


-----------

*The Company is a holding company which does  substantially  all of its business
through  two  wholly-owned   subsidiaries   (and  their   subsidiaries).   Those
wholly-owned  subsidiaries  are AMREP  Southwest  Inc.  ("ASW")  and Kable  News
Company,  Inc. ("Kable").  James Wall is the principal executive officer of ASW,
and Michael P. Duloc is the principal  executive  officer of Kable.  The Company
has no chief executive  officer and its only executive  officers are James Wall,
Senior Vice  President and Peter M. Pizza,  Vice President and Michael P. Duloc,
who may be deemed an executive officer by reason of his position with Kable.