alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
February 24, 2015 

Mr. Michael F Martin 

United States Department ofTransp011ation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket DOT -OST -1999-51 73 

Dear Mr. Martin: 

/ J f ~ '·;-,-:. Mayor's Office 

211 West Third Street 

North Platte, Nebraska 69101 

(308) 535-6724 

Fax: (308) 535-6720 

We appreciate the Depmiment of Transportation working with our community to find the most 

viable Essential Air Service (EAS) program for Nmih Platte. The EAS program is vital to our 

city and county's economic development and growth and it is important that it continues to be an 

integral part of our region's transportation system. 

Accordingly, the City of North Platte requests the selection of Great Lakes Airlines to be 

contracted to provide air service for our community from March 1, 2015 to February 29,2016, 

utilizing: Beechcraft 1900's to provide three daily round trips from North Platte to Denver, or 

EMB-120's to provide two daily round trips from North Platte to Denver. In both scenarios we 

respectfully request that Great Lakes Airlines provide an early morning departure to Denver and 

a late evening flight from Denver, with an aircraft remaining overnight in North Platte. 

We thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please feel free to 

contact me at your earliest convenience. 

Sincerely, 

JJ~~ Dwight L. Livingston 

Mayor
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6133

EDWARD THORPE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Judge. (5:18-hc-002233-BO)

Submitted: June 30, 2020 Decided: August 27, 2020

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Thorpe, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward Thorpe seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2018). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief on the merits, 

a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thorpe has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 697 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 697

  To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide 
 that any decision relating to the establishment or implementation of 
   policies of discipline of children with disabilities in school be 
reserved to each State educational agency, or as determined by a State 
           educational agency, to a local educational agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1999

  Mr. Wicker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide 
 that any decision relating to the establishment or implementation of 
   policies of discipline of children with disabilities in school be 
reserved to each State educational agency, or as determined by a State 
           educational agency, to a local educational agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISCIPLINE OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES UNDER THE 
              INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 615 of the Individuals with Disabilities 
Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1415) is amended by striking subsection (k) 
and inserting the following:
    ``(k) Discipline of Children With Disabilities.--
            ``(1) In general.--Any decision relating to the 
        establishment or implementation of policies of discipline of 
        children with disabilities in school is reserved to each State 
        educational agency, or as determined by such a State 
        educational agency, to a local educational agency.
            ``(2) Uniformity requirement.--Any policy of discipline of 
        children with disabilities in school described in paragraph (1) 
        shall be applicable to all children with disabilities in the 
        State or local educational agency, as the case may be.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--The Individuals with Disabilities 
Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 615(j), by striking ``Except as provided in 
        subsection (k)(7), during'' and inserting ``During''; and
            (2) in section 618(a)(1)(A)(vii)(I), by striking ``under 
        subparagraphs (A)(ii) and (B) of section 615(k)(1), are removed 
        to an interim alternative educational setting'' and inserting 
        ``, in accordance with policies established and implemented 
        under section 615(k), are removed from the classroom''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS


I, Thomas W. Horton, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
of AT&T Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
         30, 2004 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies
         fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

2.       Information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of AT&T Corp.


Dated:   August 3, 2004


                                                /s/ Thomas W. Horton
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Thomas W. Horton


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                     and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Biltrite Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Roger
S. Marcus, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Howard N. Feist III,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Roger S. Marcus
-------------------
Name:  Roger S. Marcus
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 13, 2003


/s/ Howard N. Feist III
-----------------------
Name:  Howard N. Feist III
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  November 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American Biltrite Inc. and will be retained by American Biltrite
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
acor-ex102_76.htm



EXHIBIT 10.2



August 13, 2019

 

Ms. Jane Wasman

246 West End Avenue

Apt. 9C

New York, NY  10023

 

Re: Amendment to December 19, 2005 Employment Agreement

 

Dear Jane:

 

This letter serves as an amendment to your employment agreement with Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. dated December 19, 2005, as previously amended (the "Agreement"), in accordance with paragraph 8(b) of the Agreement. Specifically, in exchange for your continuing to provide services to the Company, the Agreement is amended as follows, effective as of the date written above:  Section 5(c)(iv) of the Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

“(iv)To the extent that the last two sentences of Section 4 do not apply and/or your Options, SARs and Restricted or other Stock Awards have not fully vested under Section 4 or otherwise at the time of the termination of your employment, all of the unvested Options, SARs and Restricted or other Stock Awards granted to you hereunder or under any other agreement shall become immediately and fully vested (and, with respect to Restricted Stock Awards, have the restrictions removed) as of the termination date, and all vested Options shall remain exercisable for 18 months following such date, provided that no Options or SAR will be exercisable after the earlier of the latest date upon which the award could have expired by its original terms under any circumstances (as determined under section 409A of the Code) or the 10th anniversary of the original date of grant.”

 

Except as provided for in this letter, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.  If the amendment specified above is acceptable to you, please sign this letter where indicated below.

 


		
	
 
	
Very truly yours,

 

Acorda Therapeutics, Inc.

 

By: /s/ Ron Cohen

Name: Ron Cohen

Title:   President & CEO

	
Agreed to and accepted:

 

/s/Jane Wasman

Jane Wasman

 

Date: 8/13/19
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on February 4, 2000, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Gas Utilization Research Forum (“GURF”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, SBM Offshore Systems, Monaco, Cedex, FRANCE has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Gas Utilization Research Forum (“GURF”) intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On December 19, 1990, Gas Utilization Research Forum (“GURF”) filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on January 16, 1991 (56 FR 1655).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 16, 1999. A notice has not yet been published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-15597  Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EXHIBIT 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Centurion Bank

American Express Credit Account Master Trust

Reporting Period January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of American Express Centurion Bank (AECB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related
Services Company, Inc. (TRS), pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Supplemental Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2016, among TRS, AECB, American Express Bank, FSB, American Express Receivables Financing Corporation
III LLC and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation IV LLC, as acknowledged and accepted by American Express Receivables Financing Corporation II (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), does hereby certify that:



|1. | AECB performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | A review of AECBs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, AECB has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 9th day of March, 2017.



|                                |  |                                         
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK
|                                | 
|By:                             |  | /s/ Denise D. Roberts                   
|Name:                           |  | Denise D. Roberts                       
|Title:                          |  | Chief Financial Officer                 
|                                | 
|By:                             |  | /s/ Brady P. Bagley                     
|Name:                           |  | Brady P. Bagley                         
|Title:                          |  | Vice President  Controller, U S Banking
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          89,239
<SECURITIES>                                    41,498
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,496
<PP&E>                                          25,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,005
<BONDS>                                        275,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         21
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                   (127,451)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,264
<SALES>                                            293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   293
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (107,264)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (107,264)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (107,264)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (6.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.31)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 11

                           INNOVASIVE DEVICES, INC.

    Statement Regarding Computation of Pro Forma Net Loss Per Common Share
                     (In thousands; except per share data)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                                             ------------------------------------
                                                                 1996                   1995
                                                                 ----                   ----
<S>                                                          <C>                    <C>
 Net loss                                                     $   (4,062)             $   (3,734)
                                                              ==========              ========== 
 Weighted average common shares outstanding:

      a.    Shares attributable to common
              stock outstanding                                    4,911                   1,811
 
      b. Shares attributable to mandatorily
              convertible preferred stock                          1,522                   3,002
    
      c. Shares attributable to common stock
         options pursuant to SAB 83 (1)                               32                     126
                                                              ----------              ----------
 Weighted average common shares outstanding                        6,465                   4,939
                                                              ==========              ========== 
 Net loss per share                                               $(0.63)                 $(0.76)
                                                              ==========              ========== 

</TABLE> 
     
__________
(1)  No shares were attributed to common stock options subsequent to March 31, 
     1996, since, in accordance with APB 15, the inclusion of such shares would
     be anti-dilutive.
§ 105-70.041 Stay pending appeal. ( a ) An initial decision is stayed automatically pending disposition of a motion for reconsideration or of an appeal to the Authority Head.
( b ) No administrative stay is available following a final decision of the Authority Head.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable William K. Sessions, III, United States District Judge

for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSEPH JOHN GEORGE SCANIO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10659

D.C. No. 2:06-cr-00434-MCE-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 17, 2012** 

San Francisco, California

Before: BEA and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and SESSIONS, District Judge.*** 

After pleading guilty to possessing child pornography, Joseph Scanio was

sentenced to a prison term and eight subsequent years of supervised release. The

FILED

OCT 22 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

conditions of release provided that, absent permission from his probation officer,

Scanio could not associate with known felons or engage in contact with minors.

After an evidentiary hearing, the district court held that Scanio had violated the

terms of his release. The court revoked the release and sentenced Scanio to six

months in prison, to be followed by eighty-seven months of supervised release.

Scanio argues that the district court erred in finding that he had unauthorized

contact with minors and associated with known felons. He also challenges the six

month prison term. We affirm.

1. Scanio admittedly attended a party at a skating rink together with a number

of children. Scanio chose to be in the close presence of these children, and therefore

engaged in “contact” with them. See United States v. Musso, 643 F.3d 566, 571 (7th

Cir. 2011); United States v. Johnson, 446 F.3d 272, 281 (2d Cir. 2006). His probation

officer did not grant Scanio permission to attend this party. The officer’s failure to

object to Scanio driving his daughter to skating practice was not blanket permission

to attend all events involving children at the rink.

2. Scanio admitted that he repeatedly corresponded with persons he knew to

be imprisoned felons. That correspondence constitutes forbidden association. United

States v. King, 608 F.3d 1122, 1128 (9thCir. 2010).

3. The district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking supervised release
3

and imposing a six month prison term. The court expressly considered the factors in

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in imposing the sentence, which was in the middle of the

applicable Guidelines range.

AFFIRMED.