alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Natoma

Manors

Bay

Heights

Golden Pines

North

Grove

Shorecrest

Bay Point

Miami International Airport

Morningside

Grapeland Heights

Little Havana Dodge Island

Shenandoah

Virginia Key

Auburndale

Liberty City

Silver Bluff

Wynwood

Little River

Downtown

The Roads

Allapattah

Little Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

C

O

C

O

N

U

T

G

R

O

V

E

pU

ep Er sa St edi

r et a wegdE

R

e

s

olu

tio

n

2

3

-

2

7

1

Ve

rsio

n

1

2

D

3

A

l

t. Map

v.3

Ci

ty’s

Pr

op

o

s

e

d

R

e

m

e

dy

Districts

12345

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Piet Bolek, Respondent, v George Tieman & Company et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[627 NYS2d 175]

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 27, 1992, which, *inter alia,*ruled that claimant sustained a causally related disability and awarded workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant, a surgical instrument polisher, was at work cleaning surgical instruments with muriatic acid when he became dizzy and light-headed from inhaling acid vapors. As a result, he fell to the cement floor sustaining serious injuries to his *609head. We find substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision that the injuries to claimant’s head and his posttraumatic stress syndrome were causally related to the accident. We further find that, inasmuch as neither the employer nor carrier raised it at the first hearing, the Board properly refused to address the adequacy of claimant’s notice of injury. Accordingly, we decline to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2306

MICHAEL L. PACK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Governor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:09-cv-02912-WDQ)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 23, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Pack, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Pack appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Pack v. O’Malley, No. 1:09-cv-02912-WDQ (D. Md. Nov. 12, 

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 14, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 AM to 1 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Holiday Inn Gaithbersburg, Washington Room, 2 Montgomery 
Village Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20879.
    Contact Person: Vassil S. Georgiev, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAD, NIH, Room 2217, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC, 7610, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301-496-2550.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 9, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-15752 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**SERVICE SITE AGREEMENT OUTLINE**

This outline is a training tool designed to help new AmeriCorps program staff create a service site agreement. It will be most helpful when used alongside the Grant Terms and Conditions, AmeriCorps Regulations, and other AmeriCorps-specific guidance. The outline is for reference only; it does not contain citations for all AmeriCorps grant or program requirements. Additional information on member can be found on AmeriCorps State and National grantee pages on AmeriCorps.gov under Resources – “Manage Members”.

Guidance documents referenced in this outline: 

· AC = AmeriCorps State and National Grants Program Specific Terms and Conditions 

Annual General and Program Specific Terms and Conditions can be found on AmeriCorps State and National grantee pages on AmeriCorps.gov under Resources – “View Terms and Conditions”. Definition of service site in Section II.F

The service site agreement describes the relationship between an individual (an AmeriCorps member), the AmeriCorps program, and a local placement service site. The site agreement outlines the requirements for each participant in the agreement, defines boundaries and deadlines, and includes both time and financial commitments required by the service site. Strong site agreements provide clear guidance for all partners in the service program, and they are extremely important program management tools. 

2

# image1.png
§ 105-72.405 Supplies and other expendable property. ( a ) Title to supplies and other expendable property shall vest in the recipient upon acquisition. If there is a residual inventory of unused supplies exceeding $5000 in total aggregate value upon termination or completion of the project or program and the supplies are not needed for any other federally-sponsored project or program, the recipient shall retain the supplies for use on non-Federal sponsored activities or sell them, but shall, in either case, compensate the Federal Government for its share. The amount of compensation shall be computed in the same manner as for equipment.
( b ) The recipient shall not use supplies acquired with Federal funds to provide services to non-Federal outside organizations for a fee that is less than private companies charge for equivalent services, unless specifically authorized by Federal statute as long as the Federal Government retains an interest in the supplies.
#### BENJAMIN T. HALL, Respondent, *v.*JAMES PETTIGROVE, Appellant.

*Mechanic’s lien*— effect *of mortgage taken to semre sarnie debt..*

Plaintiff entered into an agreement witli defendant, who was in possession of land under a-contract, to repair a building thereon for $3,286, and took a mortgage upon other land to secure said sum. Upon the completion of the work he filed a mechanic’s lien, foreclosed the mortgage, realizing thereby $1,025, and entered a personal judgment for deficiency.

In an action to foreclose the lien, it was claimed that by taking and foreclosing the mortgage and entering the judgment he had waived his right to the lien. *Held,*that he was entitled to pursue all the remedies he had, until he realized the amount of his claim.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff, entered upon tbe report of a referee.

DykMAN, J.: •

Tbis is an appeal from a judgment entered upon tbe report of a referee, in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s ben. Tbe facts of tbe case are undisputed. , They are, that tbe defendant Pettigrove was in possession of tbe premises under a contract of purchase, and made a contract with tbe plaintiff to repair tbe building thereon for $3,286, and gave tbe plaintiff a mortgage upon certain other land to secure tbe amount. After tbe work was done, tbe plaintiff filed tbe necessary notice to effect bis lien, and then foreclosed bis mortgage, and reabzed from it $1,025, which be deducted from tbe contract-price for tbe repairs.

In tbis action, tbe defendant claims that tbe mortgage must be regarded as payment, or, at all events, a security of a higher nature than tbe original contract debt, and must be held to extinguish it.

It appears also in tbis case that there was a judgment entered against tbe defendant, Pettigrove, in tbe foreclosure suit, for deficiency for $2,678.86, and be now claims that as tbis is a ben upon tbe premises for tbe full amount due on tbe contract, and as tbe plaintiff has elected to take tbis personal judgment for tbe deficiency, tbe ben must be held to be extinguished.

*610This last position assumes that the judgment is a lien on this land, wbicb is not true, as tbe defendant bas not tbe title.

Tbe judgment in tbis action to foreclose tbe mecbanic’s lien gives more power and greater rights than a simple money judgment, and we think be is entitled to pursue all tbe remedies be bas until be realizes bis claim.

Judgment affirmed, witb costs.

Present — DyikmáN and Pbatt, JJ. BaeNAed, P. J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, witb costs.
Exhibit
32





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


and
Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Roger S. Marcus, Chief Executive
Officer, and Howard N. Feist III, Chief Financial Officer, of American Biltrite
Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:




The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of the
Company as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  May
12, 2008


/s/ Roger S.
Marcus


Roger S.
Marcus


Chief
Executive Officer








/s/ Howard N. Feist
III


Howard N.
Feist III


Chief
Financial Officer
# Comments on: 22-1418: CRUZ v. MSPB [ORDER], Nonprecedential
§ 105-64.107 What standards of conduct apply to employees with privacy-related responsibilities? ( a ) Employees who design, develop, operate, or maintain Privacy Act record systems will protect system security, avoid unauthorized disclosure of information, both verbal and written, and ensure that no system of records is maintained without public notice. All such employees will follow the standards of conduct in 5 CFR part 2635, 5 CFR part 6701, 5 CFR part 735, and 5 CFR part 2634 to protect personal information.
( b ) Employees who have access to privacy act records will avoid unauthorized disclosure of personal information, both written and verbal, and ensure they have met privacy training requirements. All such employees will follow GSA orders HCO 9297.1 GSA Data Release Policy, HCO 9297.2A GSA Information Breach Notification Policy, HCO 2180.1 GSA Rules of Behavior for Handling Personally Identifiable Information (PII), CIO P 2100.1E CIO P GSA Information Technology (IT) Security Policy, and CIO 2104.1 GSA Information Technology (IT) General Rules of Behavior.
( c ) ( 1 ) The following conditions must be met for the inclusion of an unredacted (full) SSN or partially redacted (truncated) SSN on any document sent by mail on behalf of the agency: ( i ) The inclusion of the full SSN or truncated SSN of an individual must be required or authorized by law; and
( ii ) The document must be listed on the USMDL.
( 2 ) Even when the conditions set forth in paragraph (c)(1) are met, employees shall redact SSNs in all documents sent by mail where feasible. Where full redaction is not possible due to agency requirements, partial redaction to create a truncated SSN shall be preferred to no redaction.
( 3 ) In no case shall any complete or partial SSN be visible on the outside of any envelope or package sent by mail or displayed on correspondence that is visible through the window of an envelope or package.
[74 FR 66246, Dec. 15, 2009, as amended at 88 FR 32140, May 19, 2023]
NO. 07-06-0030-CR NO. 07-06-0031-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A MAY 4, 2006

______________________________ DAW NA MILLER MAULDIN, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 2 23RD DIST RICT COURT OF GRAY COUNT Y; NO. 6633 & 6634; H ONORABLE LEE WATERS, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPIN ION Followi ng pleas of not guilty , appellant Daw na Miller Mauldin was convic

ted by the trial cour t of t wo counts of t heft

of trade secrets. Punishment was assessed at ten years confinem ent, suspended for 10 years, and a $5,000 fine, which was not sus pend ed . Appellant timel y perfected thes e appeals.2

The District Clerk

of Gray Count

y filed a moti on for

extension of time in which to file the clerk’s recordsindicating appellant had not paid nor made arr angements to pay

for the records. The court reporter notified the Clerk of this Court that appell ant’s coun sel had instructed him not to prepar e the reporter’s records becau se counse l anticip ated f iling a motion to dismiss the appeals. Appe llant’s coun sel notified the Clerk of this Court i n midMarch that he woul d file a motion to di smiss in early Apri l. To date nei ther the clerk’ s recordsnor reporter

’s records

have been file d and the d ead line s fo r doin g so ha ve expired. Neither has a motion to di smiss been filed. By letter dated April 1 7, 2006, this Court directed counsel to ei ther file the appel late record or a motion to dismi ss by April 28, 2006, noting that fail ure to do so mig ht result i n dismissal. Counsel did not respond. Acco rdin gly, the appeals are dismissed for w ant of prosecution and failure to comply with a di rective from this Court . See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3. Don H. Reavis Justice Do not publish .
No. 10-10995.

#### Tekle *v.*United States (two judgments).

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 105-68.525 Whom do I ask if I have questions about a person in the EPLS?

If you have questions about a person in the *EPLS,* ask the point of contact for the Federal agency that placed the person's name into the *EPLS.* You may find the agency point of contact from the *EPLS.*
§ 101-25.112 Energy conservation policy. ( a ) Agency officials responsible for procurement, management, and disposal of personal property and nonpersonal services shall ensure that pertinent procurement and property management documents reflect the policy set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, which has been established pursuant to Public Law 94-163, Energy Policy and Conservation Act.
( b ) With respect to the procurement or lease of personal property or nonpersonal services, which in operation consume energy or contribute to the conservation of energy, executive agencies shall promote energy conservation and energy efficiency by being responsive to the energy efficiency and/or conservation standards or goals prescribed by the U.S. Government.
[43 FR 8800, Mar. 3, 1978]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 778 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 778

  To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to require the use of 
recycled materials in the construction of Federal-aid highway projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 23, 1999

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to require the use of 
recycled materials in the construction of Federal-aid highway projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE USE OF RECYCLED MATERIALS.

    The Secretary of Transportation may issue regulations requiring the 
use of recycled materials in the construction of any Federal-aid 
highway.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6889

ROBERT L. COMEGYS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Warden, Maryland

Correctional Training Center; ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA02-948-DKC)

Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 10, 2002

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Comegys, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert L. Comegys seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Comegys has

not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right. See Comegys v. Stouffer, No. CA-02-948-DKC (D. Md. filed May

3, 2002; entered May 6, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel Clinical Trials Collaborations for Nursing Research (NR-00-03).                    

*Date:*                         July 12, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 AM to 5 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Bethesda, Maryland Room, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mary J. Stephens-Frazier, PHD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN32, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-5971.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 16, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-15761 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 102-75.965 Who must perform the protection and maintenance of excess and surplus real property pending transfer to another Federal agency or disposal?

The landholding agency remains responsible and accountable for excess and surplus real property, including related personal property, and must perform the protection and maintenance of such property pending transfer to another Federal agency or disposal. Guidelines for protection and maintenance of excess and surplus real property are in the GSA Customer Guide to Real Property Disposal. The landholding agency is responsible for complying with the requirements of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan and initiating or cooperating with others in the actions prescribed for the prevention, containment, or remedy of hazardous conditions.