alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Strafford

No. 79-211

#### The State of New Hampshire v. Oscar Houle

March 5, 1980

*Thomas D. Rath,*attorney general *{Michael A. Pignatelli,*attorney, orally), for the plaintiff.

*Caplan & Weinstein,*of Massachusetts, and *Reams & Woods,*of Exeter *{Elliot M. Weinstein*orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

On October 24,1978, a jury convicted the defendant of the theft of certain vinyl siding from a construction site, RSA 637:3. He was represented by retained counsel whose extensive, criminal experience included three years as a prosecutor. During the trial, defense counsel registered no objections or exceptions that in any way related to the *161issues briefed by subsequent counsel. These issues, therefore, were not preserved for appeal. Eight months after trial, new counsel sought to set aside the verdict arguing that the evidence was insufficient to prove that the defendant acted without authority. The Superior Court *(Cann,*J.) denied the motion, and the defendant’s exception was transferred.

A determination whether to deny a motion to set aside the verdict rests within the sound discretion of the court. In light of the defendant’s failure to object to the trial court’s rulings or instructions or to timely appeal the case, we are not convinced that the conviction should be set aside. *See Martineau v. Perrin,*119 N.H. 529, 404 A.2d 1100 (1979); *State v. Josselin,*119 N.H. 936, 409 A.2d 1336 (1979). We note that in a letter written November 24,1978, trial counsel clearly informed the defendant of the time limits relating to appeals (thirty days) and motions to set aside guilty verdicts (seven days). *See*Superior Court Rule 105. The defendant, however, waited eight months to file a motion to set aside his verdict. He did not appeal the denial of his motion until August 1979, ten months after his conviction.

Even if we were to consider the sufficiency of the evidence under the new standard articulated in *Jackson v. Virginia,*99 S. Ct. 2781 (1979), the evidence supports a finding that the defendant’s removal of the vinyl siding was unauthorized. The jury heard testimony that the defendant’s truck was on the job site at 3:00 a.m. with its lights out. Further, the defendant’s other conduct on the morning of the theft supports the inference that he acted without authority. *See State v. Taylor,*118 N.H. 855, 395 A.2d 505 (1978).

*Exceptions overruled.*
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Gilla Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Georges Benarroch, President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







By:
/s/ Georges Benarroch

Date:  April 15, 2011Name:
Georges BenarrochTitle:
President/Chief Financial Officer
#### § 105-74.630 Debarment.

*Debarment* means an action taken by a Federal agency to prohibit a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions. A recipient so prohibited is debarred, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689.
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Jay S. Wintrob, Chief Executive Officer of AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 12, 2005   /s/ JAY S. WINTROB     Jay S. Wintrob
§ 3050.43 Information on program performance. ( a ) The Postal Service shall provide the items in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section at the same time that the President submits an annual budget to Congress:
( b ) ( 1 ) The comprehensive statement required by 39 U.S.C. 2401(e);
( 2 ) The performance plan required by 39 U.S.C. 2803; and
( 3 ) The program performance reports required by 39 U.S.C. 2804.
( c ) Section 3050.10 does not apply to the reports referenced in this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                239
<SECURITIES>                            0    
<RECEIVABLES>                        1900
<ALLOWANCES>                          113
<INVENTORY>                           687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     2550
<PP&E>                               2819
<DEPRECIATION>                       1470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       3919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                2422
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                             2010                
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                            700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         3919
<SALES>                              6797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     6803
<CGS>                                5166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        8995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     71 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (2,202)  
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (2,202)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (1.01)

        

</TABLE>
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERALAVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC In the Matter of: MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC FAA OrderNo. 2015-2 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0040 1 

### Served: June 4, 2015 ORDERDISMISSING APPEAL' Bynotice served on May 29,2015, Complainant withdrew its appeal ofthe initial decision served by Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin on April 10, 2015. 

### THEREFORE, ITIS ORDERED THAT. Complainant's appeal is dismissed.
MICHAEL P. HUERTA, ADMINISTRATOR Federal Aviation Administration

I1C' 

### VICKI S. LEEMON3

### ~ Manager, Adjudication Branch

1Generally, materials filed 

### in the FAA Hearing Docket are also available for viewing at http://www.regulations.gov. 14 C.F.R. § 13.210(e)(l).
2 The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes ofthe decisions, the rules of practice, and other infonnation, are available on the Internet at the following address: www.faa.gov/about!office
_org/headquarters_offices/age/pol_adjudication/AGC400/Civii_Penalty/. See 14 C.F.R. § 13.210(e)(2). In addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw (FTRANFAA database). For additional information, see the Web site. 3 Issued under authority delegated to the ChiefCounsel and the Assistant ChiefCounsel for Litigation by memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S.C. 

### § 322(b) and 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.202 (see 57 Fed. Reg. 58,280 (I992)) andredelegated bythe Assistant ChiefCounsel for Litigation to the Manager, Adjudication Branch, by Memorandum dated August 6, 1993.
# Well Stimulation Fluid containing the PMN Substance used by Oilfield Service/Pump Companies

Worker Activity A – Connection of stimulation fluid drum, proppant line and water container to mixing truck and pump truck which lead into oilfield well hole through the casing.

275 gal totes of stimulation fluid containing up to 0.2 wt% PMN substance, hydrocarbon surfactants, solvents, co-solvents and salts (1 to 20 totes per well – depends on well size, depth and amt of fluid used) Approximately 100,000 to 1 million gal of water in a truck container/tank Method A – meter and pump PMN substance, water and fracture fluid components from the mixing truck, through pump truck and into the oilfield well hole. Mixing truck - mixes stimulation fluid with proppant and water.

Pump truck – pumps stimulation fluid from mixing truck and into the oilfield well hole.

ground Well casing

PMN substance is used from 0.0003 to 0.1 wt % active ingredient in the oilfield well

Worker Activity C – Transport and transfer of recovered fracture fluid (with PMN substance) from truck container to waste water treatment facility. Conc. of PMN substance in recovered fluid is estimated at 0.1 wt% max (in fracture fluid & formation water, so diluted). The fluid is recovered by reversing the pressure after treatment is completed. Worker Activity B – Connection of piping from oilfield well casing to remove PMN substance/treatment solution after treatment is completed from oilfield well hole and into truck container/tank. ground

Pay zone Pay zone
#### Waymond E. WRIGHT, Defendant Below-Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below-Appellee.

No. 553, 2015

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: April 11, 2016

Decided: May 23, 2016

Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware, Cr. ID 1412000775.

AFFIRMED.
# January 18, 2000.

Wells Rural Electric Company (WREC) is a Nevada rural electric cooperative providing electrical service to approximately 5,300 customers in northeastern Nevada and Tooele County, Utah. On November 19, 1999, in Docket No. EL00-19-000, WREC filed a request for waiver of the requirements of Order Nos. 888 and 889. In its filing, WREC also requested certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, WREC requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities by WREC. On January 12, 2000, the Commission issued an Order Granting Request For Waivers of Order Nos. 888 And 889, Addressing Requests For Other Waivers And Accepting Agreements For Filing (Order), in the above-docketed proceedings.

The Commission's January 12, 2000 Order granted the request for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in Ordering Paragraphs (D), (E), and (G):

(D) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by WREC should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.

(E) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in Ordering Paragraph (D) above, WREC is hereby authorized to issue securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of WREC compatible with the public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.

(G) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to require a further showing that neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of WREC's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities . . .

Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to intervene or protests, as set forth above, is February 11, 2000.

Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-1584 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 013 Attachment Name CAS RN 145602-88-2 Chemical structure Identity and Low Risk Polymer Analysis Associated PMN Section Number Pt.I, Sec.B, 2e. (Chem 3) Contains CBI Report Number Sanitized Version Sanitized Version

# All CBI has been removed
Muldoon, Albert (OST)
From: Sent: To: Subject: steven fleming <steven-fleming2@sbcglobal.net> Monday, June 10, 2013 6:08 PM EAS (OST); boonecountyairport@windstream.net; boonejudge@windstream.net; mayor@cityofharrison.com Harrison

I want Boutique Airto be the air service provider for Harrisonbecause the additional service to Dallas will help me getto places I need to go. I also support Boutique Air's proposal because the modempressurizedPilatus aircraft will save me time and offer a more comfortableride.

1
July 15, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF A.T., A MINOR CHILD

NO. 14-14-00071-CV 

________________________________

This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by the Department of 

Family and Protective Services. We order the motion be granted, and that the 

court’s former judgment of July 1, 2014, be vacated, set aside, and annulled. We 

further order this court’s memorandum opinion of July 1, 2014, withdrawn.

This cause, an appeal from a judgment establishing paternity, terminating 

parental rights, and appointing the Department of Family and Protective Services 

as sole managing conservator signed December 12, 2013, was heard on the 

transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the 

judgment. We AFFIRM the part of the judgment of the court below establishing 

paternity and terminating parental rights. We order the part of the judgment of the 

court below appointing the Department of Family and Protective Services as sole 

managing conservator REVERSED and REMAND the cause to the trial court for 

proceedings consistent with the court’s opinion. If the trial court determines that 

Troy J. Wilson and Georgette George-Wilson have standing to intervene, then the 

trial court is instructed to commence the new trial no later than 180 days after 

this court’s mandate issued. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(c).

We order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
In the

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cause No. 14-13-01020-CR

In the

Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas 

at Houston

REGINALD BROUSSARD 

Appellant

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

Appellee

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR 

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

Pursuant to Rules 68.2(c), 10.5(b) and 9.3(b) Appellant respectfully requests this 

Court to grant this motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s Petition for 

Discretionary Review, and offers the following facts in support of this request: 

1. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed in the Court of Appeals for the 

Fourteenth District of Texas on February 3, 2015. No motion for 

rehearing was filed.

2. Appellant’s Petition For Discretionary Review was due on March 5, 2015. 

3. No previous extension has been requested. The undersigned attorney is 

responsible for several other appeals and needed additional time to prepare 

a petition.

4. The undersigned respectfully requests an extension for 30 days until April 

6, 2015, to file his Petition for Discretionary Review which will be filed 

under separate cover. 

PD-0282-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 3/13/2015 6:32:35 PM

Accepted 3/18/2015 10:33:11 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2

Appellant respectfully prays this Honorable Court grant his motion for extension 

of time to file his petition for discretionary review.

Respectfully submitted,

____/s/ Casey Garrett____

Casey Garrett

4010 Bluebonnet, Ste. 204

Houston, Texas 77025

(713) 228-3800

Texas Bar No. 00787197

Casey.garrett@sbcglobal.net
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been served 

through the e-file system to the following recipient:

Harris County Office of the District Attorney

Appellate Division

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

____/s/ Casey Garrett____

Casey Garrett

4010 Bluebonnet, Ste. 204

Houston, Texas 77025

(713) 228-3800

Texas Bar No. 00787197
§ 105-70.026 Form, filing and service of papers. ( a ) *Form.* ( 1 ) Documents filed with the ALJ shall include an original and two copies.
( 2 ) Every pleading and paper filed in the proceeding shall contain a caption setting forth the title of the action, the case number assigned by the ALJ, and a designation of the paper (e.g., motion to quash subpoena).
( 3 ) Every pleading and paper shall be signed by, and shall contain the address and telephone number of the party or the person on whose behalf the paper was filed, or his or her representative.
( 4 ) Papers are considered filed when they are mailed. Date of mailing may be established by a certificate from the party or its representative or by proof that the document was sent by certified or registered mail.
( b ) *Service.* A party filing a document with the ALJ shall, at the time of filing, serve a copy of such document on every other party. Service upon any party of any document other than those required to be served as prescribed in § 105-70.008 shall be made by delivering a copy or by placing a copy of the document in the United States mail, postage prepaid and addressed to the party's last known address. When a party is represented by a representative, service shall be made upon such representative in lieu of the actual party.
( c ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the individual serving the document by personal delivery or by mail, setting forth the manner of service, shall be proof of service.
Order entered April 10 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01389
- CV
STEPHEN HOLLOWAY AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellant
V. PINWELL INVESTMENTS LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 13
- 04637
- C 

### O RDER Both the clerk’s and reporter’s records in this case are overdue. By postcard dated December 10, 2013, we notified the Court Reporter that the reporter’s record was overdue. We directed the Court Reporter to file the record within thirty days. Also by postcard dated December 10, 2013, we notified the Dallas County Clerk that the clerk’s record was overdue. We directed the County Clerk to file the clerk’s record within thirty days. Thereafter, by order dated March 20, 2014, we ordered the Dallas County Clerk to file either the clerk’s record or written verification that appellant has not been found indigent and has not paid for the record within ten days. In the same order, we ordered the Court R eporter to file either: (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification that no hearings were recorded; or (3) writtenverification that appellant has not been found indigent and has not paid for the record within ten days. By letter dated March 21, 2014, the Dallas County Clerk’s office informed the Court that appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay and that the clerk’s record would be “automatically uploaded.” To date the clerk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly we ORDER the Dallas County Clerk to file the clerk’s record within TEN DAYS

. The Court Reporter has not filed the reporter’s record, the requested verification, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the reporter’s record. According ly , w e ORDER Jan et E. Wright, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 3 , to file , with TEN DAYS , either: (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification that the reporter’s record has not been requested, or ( 3 ) written verification that no hearings were recorded

. We notify appellant that if we receive verification he has not requested the record, we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c) . We expressly CAUTION Janet E. Wright that failure to comply wit h this order may result in an order that she not sit as a court reporter until she complies. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the following persons:
Honorable Sally Montgomery Presiding Judge County Court at Law No. 3 John Warren Dallas County Clerk Janet Wright Official Court Reporter, County Court at Law No. 3
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
#### § 105-60.702 Requirements to preserve FOIA records.

GSA shall preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests that it receives under this subpart, as well as copies of all requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized pursuant to title 44 of the United States Code or the General Records Schedule 4.2 of the NARA. GSA shall not dispose of or destroy records while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under FOIA.