alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 85

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit, with certain exceptions,

the transfer of a handgun to, or the possession of a handgun by,

an individual who has not attained 21 years of age.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. BLAGOJEVICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit, with

certain exceptions, the transfer of a handgun to, or the

possession of a handgun by, an individual who has not

attained 21 years of age.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BAN ON HANDGUNS FOR PERSONS UNDER AGE

4 21.

5 Section 922(x)(5) of title 18, United States Code, is

6 amended by striking ‘‘18’’ and inserting ‘‘21’’.

Æ
#### § 301-51.9 What are the consequences if I misuse the Government contractor-issued travel charge card on official travel?

Your agency may take appropriate disciplinary action if you misuse the Government contractor-issued travel charge card according to internal agency policies and procedures.

[FTR Amdt. 2010-02, 75 FR 24436, May 5, 2010. Redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2016-01, 81 FR 63138, Sept. 14, 2016]
#### § 301-11.13 How does sharing a room with another person affect my per diem reimbursement?

Your reimbursement is limited to one-half of the double occupancy rate if the person sharing the room is another Government employee on official travel. If the person sharing the room is not a Government employee on official travel, your reimbursement is limited to the single occupancy rate.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 855 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 855

 To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 
 relating to the dumping of dredged material in Long Island Sound, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 1999

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 
 relating to the dumping of dredged material in Long Island Sound, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Long Island Sound Preservation and 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. DUMPING OF DREDGED MATERIALS IN LONG ISLAND SOUND.

    Section 106(f) of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries 
Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1416(f)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(f) Dumping of Dredged Material in Long Island Sound.--
            ``(1) In general.--No dredged material from any Federal 
        project, or from any non-Federal project, that contains any of 
        the constituents prohibited as other than trace contaminants 
        (as defined by the Federal ocean dumping criteria set forth in 
        section 227.6 of title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations) 
        may be dumped in Long Island Sound or Block Island Sound, 
        except in cases in which it is demonstrated to the 
        Administrator, and the Administrator certifies by publication 
        in the Federal Register, that the dumping of the dredged 
        material containing such constituents will not cause 
        significant undesirable effects, including the threat 
        associated with bioaccumulation of such constituents in marine 
        organisms.
            ``(2) Federal projects exceeding 25,000 yards.--In addition 
        to other provisions of law and notwithstanding the specific 
        exclusion relating to dredged material in the first sentence in 
        section 102(a), any dumping of dredged material in Long Island 
        Sound from a Federal project (or pursuant to Federal 
        authorization) by a non-Federal applicant exceeding 25,000 
        cubic yards shall comply with the criteria established pursuant 
        to the second sentence of section 102(a) relating to the 
        effects of dumping.
            ``(3) Relation to other law.--Subsection (d) shall not 
        apply to this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content

              - Home
              - Products
              -  Services                  - Access
                - Archive
                - Certification
                - Maps
                - Monitoring
                - Online Store
                - Regional
                - World Data System 
              -  Resources                  - Alerts
                - Education
                - Metadata
                - NEWIS
                - Quick Links 
              -  News                  - BAMS
                - Publications 
              -  About                  - Locations
                - Our Impact 
              - Contact
              -  			Search		       

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
- Ocean Exploration Video Portal

Feedback

Help

**The NCEI search service is experiencing heavy usage. Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again in a few minutes      . If you need assistance, please email oer.video@noaa.gov**

## Ocean Exploration Video Portal

this form

##### Keywords

                Apply                  OR  AND                 to multiple keywords (separate with commas)                                  Match keywords                anywhereexactly                To choose from a specific dive NN use DIVENN.

##### Observation Dates

**Start date:**
(YYYY-MM-DD)                        **

**End date:**
(YYYY-MM-DD)                        **

##### Depth Range

**Min. Depth (in meters):**

**Max. Depth (in meters):**

##### Video Type

##### Camera Location

##### Dive Site Names

View Basket

##### Geographic Coverage

##### Cruises

View Basket

**Cruise IDs:****Locations:****Keywords:****Additional Terms:****Observation Dates:****Depth Range:****Geographic Coverage:**

See results through RESTAPI:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5          
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000      
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                               18,039
<SECURITIES>                                         10,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                        45,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                          80,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    162,297
<PP&E>                                              120,378
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      320,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                94,211
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 46
<OTHER-SE>                                           67,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        320,329
<SALES>                                             214,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    216,237
<CGS>                                               148,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       208,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    4,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       8,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                          3,192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          3,426
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .89
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                OF BESTWAY, INC.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended April 30, 2004 of Bestway, Inc.
(the "Issuer").

I, Beth A. Durrett, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to
the best of my knowledge:

      (i)   the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
            78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

Date:  June 14, 2004                 By: /s/ Beth A. Durrett
                                         ----------------------------
                                             Name:  Beth A. Durrett

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 14 day of June, 2004.

/s/ Jeanne A. Andress
-------------------------------------

Name: Jeanne A. Andress
Title: Notary Public

My commission expires: 4/13/06
EXHIBIT 23.1





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-99736-01,
333-3526-01 and 333-39365-01) of our reports dated January 18, 1999 on our
audits of the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Tanger
Properties Limited Partnership as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the
years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 26, 1999
§ 105-55.018 Exemptions. ( a ) The preceding sections of this part, to the extent they reflect remedies or procedures prescribed by the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, such as administrative offset, use of credit bureaus, contracting for collection agencies, and interest and related charges, do not apply to debts arising under, or payments made under, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.*); the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*), except to the extent provided under 42 U.S.C. 404 and 31 U.S.C. 3716(c); or the tariff laws of the United States. These remedies and procedures, however, may be authorized with respect to debts that are exempt from the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, to the extent they are authorized under some other statute or the common law.
( b ) Claims arising from the audit of transportation accounts pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3726 will be determined, collected, compromised, terminated or settled in accordance with regulation published under the authority of 31 U.S.C. 3726 (see 41 CFR part 101-41, administered by the Director, Office of Transportation Audits) and are otherwise exempted from this part.
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Cessna Engineering 9/2/20 15 Engineering evaluations, 

need for ICA, completion 

date for repair of aft 

canted bulkhead 

Other/Additional Information: FAA ACO Airframe group has been working with Cessna engineering 

since 9 Oct 20 14.
January 12,2011 

ACTIOIM 

SlO-110113-010 

COWTF^OLNO 

i-7\RTMENT OF 

•!;3PORWiOr' 

/ C nr-r RATIONS 

^;;i JMN 31 P i- 5U 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova. Gustavois. Petersburg. WraneelL and 

Yakutat. Alaska. Docket OST-1998^899 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

Please let me add my support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to provide Essential Air Service. As you may 

know Cordova is a small, remote Alaskan community that relies heavily on air service for access to other 

communities in Alaska as well as to the Lower 48 states and to Hawaii. Many of the people who live in Cordova 

travel frequently and need this air service often for even their basic needs. 

We do have the Marine Highway, but it is not available on a daily basis and therefore, the air service provided by 

Alaska Airlines is extremely essential to our community. We must rely on air service to access health care providers 

with specialties or for ongoing treatments such as chemotherapy. We are dependent on air service for 

communication with providers of specific licenses which are required of many in our workforce. People must travel 

to Anchorage or to Juneau for many services that would otherwise not be available to them. 

The impact on our community if the essential air service provided by Alaska Airlines is not provided would be 

keenly felt. Many of our basic goods in addition to services arrive via air. We have certain groceries that would 

otherwise be unavailable to us without air service. 

Furthermore, the type of aircraft flown by Alaska Airlines is equipped with the Required Navigation Performance 

Technology precision technology enables the airline to reliably access the airport during inclement weather which is 

frequent. It thus reduces diversions and cancellations and provides for dependability in the delivery of both people 

and products to Cordova. Alaska's jet service is crucial to the economic and emotional well being of our 

community. 

For these reasons, I urge DOT to select Alaska Airlines to continue to provide essential air service to Southcentral 

and Southeast Alaska. The airline has done this successftilly for more than thirty years. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Harding 

Campus Coordinator, Cordova 

Prince William Sound Community College 

cc; Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Dennis DeVany, Chief, HAS and Domestic Analysis 

The Honorable Sean Pamell, Governor, State of Alaska 

Marc A. Luiken, Commissioner, Alaska State Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
# FILED



# : ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24-0293
STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. TRAVIS WAYNE HATFIELD,

Defendant and Appellant. ORDER Bowen Greenwood CLERK OFTHE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA



# FILED MAY 

## 2 1 2024 Bowen Greenwood Cterk of Suprerne Court St.....te of Morrt:
-

.4rra Travis Wayne Hatfield petitions this Court for an out-of-time appeal, explaining he is currently incarcerated in the Riverside Special Needs Unit, after receiving medical treatment, andthat the facility has limited legal resources. He states that both ofhis public defenders "informed [him] that they [do not] generally provide [appellate] legal assistance." Hatfield includes a copy ofthe sentencing judgment as well as a motion to appoint counsel. On January 14, 2024, the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, issued its written judgment, sentencing Hatfield to the Montana State Prison for a thirty-year terrn and a ten-year concurrent term for felony sexual intercourse without consent and felony sexual abuse ofchildren, respectively. M. R. App. P. 4(6) allows this Court to grant an out-of-time appeal "[i]n the infrequent harsh case and under extraordinary circumstances arnounting to a gross miscarriage ofjustice[.]" Hatfield was convicted and sentenced recently. This Court concludes that Hatfield is entitled to an appeal and that he may be entitled to representation ofcounsel. Section 46-8-104, MCA. Therefore, 05/21/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0293ITISORDEREDthat Hatfield'sPetition foran Out-of-TimeAppeal isGRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat Hatfield'sMotion forAppointment ofCounsel is GRANTED. The AppellateDefender Division shall have thirty days from the date ofthis Order within which either to file a Notice of Appeal or a Motion to Rescind this Order Appointing Counsel. IfHatfield qualifies for appointed counsel, the Appellate Defender Division shall immediately order the appropriate transcripts. The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court is directedto discard Hatfield's enclosedNotice of Appeal that has not been filed. The Clerk is also directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to counsel ofrecord; to the Appellate Defender Divrn, and to Travis Wayne Hatfield personally. DATED this

—

day ofMay, 2024.

hiefJustice

Justices
§ 128-48.102-1 Vesting of title in the United States. ( a ) Abandoned or other unclaimed property, subject to the provisions of section 203(m) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (40 U.S.C. 484(m)), shall remain in the custody of and be the responsibility of the bureau finding such property.
( b ) If the owner of such property is known, the owner shall be notified within 20 days of finding such property by certified mail at the owner's address of record that the property may be claimed by the owner or his designee and that if the property is not claimed within 30 days from the date the letter of notification is postmarked, the title of the property will vest in the United States.
( c ) If the owner of such property is not known and the estimated value of the property exceeds $100, the bureau shall post notice within 20 days of finding such property, which contains the following information: ( 1 ) A description of the property including model or serial numbers, if known.
( 2 ) A statement of the location where the property was found and the office that has custody of it.
( 3 ) A statement that any person desiring to claim the property must file with the bureau within 30 days from the date of first publication a claim for said property.
( 4 ) A complete mailing address is to be provided as a point of contact within the bureau for any person to obtain additional information concerning the property or the procedures involved in filing a claim. Notice must be published once a week for at least three successive weeks. Sound judgment and discretion must be used in selecting the publication medium. Advertisements should be placed in a publication of general circulation within the judicial district where the property was found.
( d ) Property, as described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, shall be held for a period of 30 days from the date of the first publication of notice. Upon the expiration of this 30-day period, title to such property vests in the United States, except that title reverts to the owner where a proper claim is filed within three years from the date of vesting of title in the United States, but if the property has been in official use, transferred for official use, or sold at the time the proper claim is approved, title shall not revert back to the former owner. The former owner shall instead obtain reimbursement in accordance with 41 CFR 101-48.102-4 or 101-48.305-1.
( e ) If the owner of such property is unknown and the estimated value of the property is $100 or less, no notice is required, and the property shall be held for a period of 30 days from the date of finding the property. Upon expiration of this 30-day period, title to such property vests in the United States.
"Gentry , Frederick " T o James Turner/R6/USEPA/US@EPA <fgentry(g>littlerock.org > ^ ^ ^^^^ ^ Ghose/R6/USEPA/US@EP A 12/12/200 7 03:2 9 P M bc c Subjec t Roger s Roa d Landfil l

Dea rMr

. Turner : I a m writin g yo u regardin g th e "Environmenta l Protectio n Easemen t an d Declaratio n o fRestrictiv e Covenants " fo rth e Roger s Roa d Landfil l whic h i s a n approximatel y20.29 6 acr e trac t o f lan d locate d o n Roger s Roa d nea rit s intersectio n wit h Graha m Roa d i n Pulask i County , Arkansas , jus t eas t o fth e corporat e limit s o f th e Cit

yo fJacksonville , Arkansas , Afte rreadin g a draf t o fth e documen t provide d t o m e byJacksonvill e CityAttorney , Robert Bamburg , I hav e som e question s o rconcern s whic h I hav e als o spoke n wit h Mr

. Ghos e about

. T o mak e thi s eas yI wil l lis t thos e concern s o rquestion s an d yo u ca n the n respon d t o them , 1, ) O n th e firs t pag e o f th e documen t an d th e thir d paragrap h afte r"witnesseth" , i t state s tha t ther e wil l b e groundwate rmonitorin g fo ra perio d ofthirtyyears

. Wha t I woul d lik e t o kno wi s di d tha t thirt yyear s begin , upo n th e installatio n ofth e monitorin g wells ? I t seem s a s thoug h i t woul d have , howeve rI don' t thin k tha t i t i s clear , 2. ) O n pag e thre e lin e "f , i t completel yprohibit s industria l o rcommercia l developmen t o f"Th e Property " whic h woul d mea n th e entir e 20.29 6 acres , I woul d lik e t o kno who wman yacre s ar e not actuall yimpacte d b

yth e Sit e remedia l plan

. W e nee d t o kno who wmuc h ca n an d can' t b e use d fo rcertai n development

. Fo ryears i t ha s bee n m yunderstandin g tha t onl y1.38 acre s whic h i s fence d i n wa s unde ran ySit e remedia l component

. Thi s agreemen t seem s t o g o beyon d tha t i n som e o fit s description s whic h cause s m e concern

. I n lookin g at som e o f th e companie s o rorganization s tha t have applie d fo rth e "Read yfo rReuse " Progra m an d wer e give n permissio n t o build , i t seem s a s thoug h th e contaminatio n level s mayhav e bee n th e sam e i f not exceede d tha t o f th e Roger s Roa d Landfill , At thi s poin t I d o no t kno wwha t th e contaminatio n level s wer e i n 199 0 befor e th e clea n up , wha t the ywer e i n 199 5 afte rth e clea n u p an d wha t the ymigh t b e today

. I f yo u coul d provid e a n answe rt o tha t I woul d greatl yappreciat e it

. W e mayat som e poin t soo n sal e th e propert yan d al l ofthi s informatio n woul d b e helpful

. Thanks , Frederic k Gentr y Assistan t t o th e Boar d o f Director s Cityo f Littl e Roc k

' 371-680 1 50 0 Wes t Markha m Roo m 20 3



### 905033 5
#### § 109-45.303 Reporting property for sale.
§ 102-117.355 Why should I report? ( a ) Reporting your agency's prior fiscal year transaction level transportation data for freight and cargo, including HHG, procured either through contract or tender, as well as your transportation management information will enable GSA to: ( 1 ) Assess the magnitude and key characteristics of transportation within the Government (*e.g.,* how much agencies spend; what type of commodity is shipped; most used lanes, etc.); and
( 2 ) Analyze and recommend changes to Governmentwide policies, standards, practices, and procedures to improve Government transportation management.
( b ) Agencies that choose to report may identify opportunities within their organization to improve transportation management program performance as a result of the data analytics.