Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 121 / Thursday, June 22, 2000 / Notices 38883

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1999–2000 Ferrari

Modena 360

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

44262 (August 13, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–327

8. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6350

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1978–1980

Toyota Land Cruiser

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1978–1980 Toyota Land

Cruiser

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

56564 (October 20, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–320

9. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6340

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1991–1992

Toyota Previa

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1991–1992 Toyota Previa

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

56380 (October 19, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–326

10. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6339

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1990–1992

Audi 100

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1990–1992 Audi 100

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

56381 (October 19, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–317

11. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6384

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1994 Eagle

Vision

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1994 Eagle Vision

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

58126 (October 28, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–323

12. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6349

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1993–1996

Mercedes-Benz SL Series

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1993–1996 Mercedes-Benz

SL Series

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

56568 (October 20, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–329

13. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6348

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1998–1999

Mercedes-Benz S Class

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1998–1999 Mercedes-Benz

S Class

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

56566 (October 20, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–325

14. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6601

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1990–1991

Toyota MR2

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1990–1991 Toyota MR2

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

69585 (December 13, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–324

15. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6347

Nonconforming Vehicles: 2000 Harley

Davidson FX, FL, and XL

motorcycles

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 2000 Harley Davidson FX,

FL, and XL motorcycles

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

56566 (October 20, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–321

16. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6383

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1998 Jaguar

XK–8

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1998 Jaguar XK–8

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

58125 (October 28, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–330

17. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6524

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1996 Ford

Escort (Nicaragua)

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1996 Ford Escort

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

67601 (December 2, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–322

18. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6668

Nonconforming Vehicles; 1991

Mercedes-Benz 560SEC

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1991 Mercedes-Benz

560SEC

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

73118 (December 29, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–333

19. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6525

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1994 Saab

9000

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1994 Saab 9000

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

69069 (December 9, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–334

20. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6526

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1998–200V

Volvo S70

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1998–2000 Volvo S70

Notice of Petition published at: 64 FR

67600 (December 2, 1999)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–335

21. Docket No. NHTSA–99–6820

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1997–2000

Audi A8

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1997–2000 Audi A8

Notice of Petition published at: 65 FR

5019 (February 2, 2000)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–337

22. Docket No. NHTSA–2000–6941

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1998 Jeep

Wrangler

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1998 Jeep Wrangler

Notice of Petition published at: 65 FR

8759 (February 22, 2000)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–341

23. Docket No. NHTSA–2000–7002

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1976–1985

Rolls Royce Corniche

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1976–1985 Rolls Royce

Corniche

Notice of Petition published at: 65 FR

19040 (April 10, 2000)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–339

24. Docket No. NHTSA–2000–7112

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1987–1989

Bentley

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1987–1989 Bentley

Notice of Petition published at: 65 FR

19428 (April 11, 2000)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–340

[FR Doc. 00–15851 Filed 6–21–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33882]

Kasgro Rail Corp.—Lease and

Operation Exemption—EASX

Corporation and Rail Services

Corporation

Kasgro Rail Corp., a noncarrier, has

filed a verified notice of exemption

under 49 CFR 1150.31 to lease from

EASX Corporation and Rail Services

Corporation and operate (through its

Kasgro Rail Lines Division) two

branches of rail line totaling

approximately 3.5 miles in length in

New Castle, Lawrence County, PA. The

lines are as follows: (1) the ‘‘New Castle

Branch’’ which begins at New Castle

Branch Monumented Base Line (MBL),

at Survey Station 10+00, opposite the

former Pittsburgh and Lake Erie

Railroad’s (P&LE) Main Line MBL

Survey Station 2580+10, and extends in

a generally northeasterly direction to the

former P&LE Valuation Station 146+10;

and (2)(a) the ‘‘Big Run Branch’’ which

begins at P&LE New Castle Branch

Baseline of Survey, at Survey Station

84+44, and extends in a generally

southwesterly direction to the

connection with trackage of CSX

Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), and (b)

approximately 0.7 miles of rail line

known as the ‘‘Sample Spur,’’ which

begins at Valuation Station 2+00 off of

CSXT’s main line between Cumberland,

MD, and Willard, OH, and continues in

a generally northwardly direction to

38884 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 121 / Thursday, June 22, 2000 / Notices

Valuation Station 40+75.7, where it

connects with ISS Railroad, Inc.

The parties report that they intend to

consummate the transaction on the

effective date of the exemption. The

earliest the transaction can be

consummated is June 12, 2000, 7 days

after the exemption was filed.

If the verified notice contains false or

misleading information, the exemption

is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the

proceeding to revoke the exemption

under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed

at any time. The filing of a petition to

revoke will not automatically stay the

transaction.

An original and 10 copies of all

pleadings, referring to STB Finance

Docket No. 33882, must be filed with

the Surface Transportation Board, Office

of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925

K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20423–

0001. In addition, a copy of each

pleading must be served on Richard H.

Streeter, Esq., Barnes & Thornburg, 1401

Eye Street, NW, Suite 500, Washington,

DC 20005.

Board decisions and notices are

available on our website at

‘‘WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.’’

Decided: June 14, 2000.

By the Board, David M. Konschnik,

Director, Office of Proceedings.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–15679 Filed 6–21–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915–00–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

June 16, 2000.

The Department of the Treasury has

submitted the following public

information collection requirement(s) to

OMB for review and clearance under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13. Copies of the

submission(s) may be obtained by

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance

Officer listed. Comments regarding this

information collection should be

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed

and to the Treasury Department

Clearance Officer, Department of the

Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be

received on or before July 24, 2000 to be

assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545–1099.

Form Number: IRS Form 8811.

Type of Review: Extension.

Title: Information Return for Real

Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits

(REMICs) and Issuers of Collateralized

Debt Obligations.

Description: Form 8811 is used to

collet the name, address, and phone

number of a representative of a REMIC

who can provide brokers with the

correct income amounts that the

broker’s clients must report on their

income tax returns. The form allows the

IRS to provide the REMIC industry the

information necessary to issue correct

information returns to investors.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit.

Estimated Number of Respondents/

Recordkeepers: 1,000.

Estimated Burden Hours Per

Respondent/Recordkeeper:

Recordkeeping—3 hr., 50 min.

Learning about the law or the form—

35 min.

Preparing, copying, assembling, and

sending the form to the IRS—41 min.

Frequency of Response: Other (Onetime for each obligation.)

Estimated Total Reporting/

Recordkeeping Burden: 5,110 hours.

Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear,

Internal Revenue Service, Room 5244,

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20224.

OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt,

(202) 395–7860, Office of Management

and Budget, Room 10202, New

Executive Office Building, Washington,

DC 20503.

Mary A. Able,

Departmental Reports, Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–15726 Filed 6–21–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–U

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service

Solicitation of Applications for

Membership on Customs COBRA Fees

Advisory Committee

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service,

Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: General notice.

SUMMARY: This document sets forth

amended criteria for membership on the

Customs COBRA Fees Advisory

Committee and requests that new

applications be submitted for

membership on the committee. The

amended criteria limit membership on

the Committee to one U.S. Customs

representative and up to eight parties

that are directly subject to the payment

of COBRA user fees. Also, the amended

criteria make clear that a party is

ineligible to serve on the Committee if

the party serves on another advisory

committee chartered by the Department

of the Treasury, including any separate

bureau, service or other office within

the Department of the Treasury.

Applications previously received for

membership on the Committee will

need to be resubmitted for consideration

under this document.

DATES: New applications for

membership will be accepted until July

24, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Applications should be

addressed to Richard Coleman, Trade

Compliance Team, U.S. Customs

Service, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue,

NW., Room 5.2–A, Washington, D.C.

20229, Attention: COBRA 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard Coleman, Trade Compliance

Team, U.S. Customs Service, 202–927–

0563.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

By enactment of Public Law 106–36,

the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical

Corrections Act of 1999, section 13031

of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act (COBRA) of 1985 (19

U.S.C. 58c) was amended by adding

language which directs the

Commissioner of Customs to establish

an advisory committee whose

membership will consist of

representatives from the airline, cruise

ship and other transportation industries

that may be subject to fees under section

13031.

The Committee, in accordance with

the statute, will advise the

Commissioner of Customs on issues

related to the performance of

inspectional services of the United

States Customs Service. This advice will

include, but not be limited to, issues

such as the time periods during which

inspectional services should be

performed, the proper number and

deployment of inspectional officers, the

level of fees and the appropriateness of

any proposed fee.

In accordance with the direction to

create the advisory committee, Customs

published a document in the Federal

Register (65 FR 6254) on February 8,

2000, establishing criteria and

procedures for the selection of members

on a Customs COBRA Fees Advisory

Committee. Customs subsequently

decided to amend these criteria

principally to limit membership to

applicants who are directly subject to

COBRA user fees. Customs believes that

these parties would be better-suited to

serve on the committee. A revised

charter for the committee will be duly

filed. This document sets forth the