alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
   I, N. Scott Gillis, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AIGSunAmerica Life Assurance Company, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AIG SunAmerica LifeAssurance Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.   Date: November 12, 2004     /s/  N. SCOTT GILLIS  N. Scott Gillis  Senior Vice President
§ 105-55.012 Contracting with private collection contractors and with entities that locate and recover unclaimed assets. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section, the General Services Administration (GSA) may contract with private collection contractors, as defined in 31 U.S.C. 3701(f), to recover delinquent debts provided that— ( 1 ) GSA retain the authority to resolve disputes, compromise debts, suspend or terminate collection activity, and refer debts for litigation;
( 2 ) The private collection contractor is not allowed to offer the debtor, as an incentive for payment, the opportunity to pay the debt less the private collection contractor's fee unless GSA has granted such authority prior to the offer;
( 3 ) The contract provides that the private collection contractor is subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 to the extent specified in 5 U.S.C. 552a(m), and to applicable Federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to debt collection practices, including but not limited to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692; and
( 4 ) The private collection contractor is required to account for all amounts collected.
( b ) GSA will use Governmentwide debt collection contracts to obtain debt collection services provided by private collection contractors. However, GSA may refer debts to private collection contractors pursuant to a contract between the Agency and the private collection contractor only if such debts are not subject to the requirement to transfer debts to Treasury for debt collection. See 31 U.S.C. 3711(g); 31 CFR 285.12(e).
( c ) GSA may fund private collection contractor contracts in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3718(b), or as otherwise permitted by law.
( d ) GSA may enter into contracts for locating and recovering assets of the United States, such as unclaimed assets.
( e ) GSA may enter into contracts for debtor asset and income search reports. In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3718(b), such contracts may provide that the fee a contractor charges the Agency for such services may be payable from the amounts recovered, unless otherwise prohibited by statute.
§ 102-5.85 What information should our determination for field work include if positions are identified rather than named individuals? If positions are identified rather than named individuals, your determination for field work should include sufficient information to satisfy an audit, if necessary. This information should include the job title, number, and operational level where the work is to be performed (e.g., five recruiter personnel or, positions at the Detroit Army Recruiting Battalion). Note to § 102-5.85 :
An agency head may elect to designate positions rather than individual names, especially in positions where rapid turnover occurs.
#### § 301-10.1 Am I eligible for payment of transportation expenses?

Yes, you are eligible for payment of transportation expenses when performing official travel, including authorized transportation expenses incurred within the TDY location.

[FTR Amdt. 2010-02, 75 FR 24435, May 5, 2010]
#### § 105-50.001-6 GSA.

*GSA* means the General Services Administration.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 118 (Monday, June 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1096]


Approval for Extension of Authority of Board Order 744; Foreign-
Trade Subzone 59A, Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp., U.S.A. (Utility 
Work Trucks), Lincoln, NE

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, Board Order 744 (60 FR 30518, 6-9-95) granted authority on 
behalf of Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp., U.S.A. (KMM) to 
manufacture utility work trucks (i.e., Mules\TM\) under FTZ procedures 
for an initial period of four years (expires July 1, 2000), subject to 
extension;
    Whereas, KMM, operator of Subzone 59A, has requested authority to 
extend its manufacturing authority for utility work trucks on a 
permanent basis;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (64 FR 25476, 5-12-99);
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the request 
would be in the public interest;
    Now therefore, the Board hereby approves the request subject to the 
FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of June 2000.
Troy H. Cribb,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    ATTEST:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15402 Filed 6-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
SERVED NOVEMBER 23, 2010 ^^^^^ ^ ^^ 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' i 'r§^!®^^^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS '"' -'^tHAllUFNb 

WASHINGTON, DC ,,,g ,.,,,^, , ^ p ^^ U2 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FLIGHTSTAR AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPlOGLOOl 1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNO. FAA-2010-1075 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2008-GL-05-0045) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, 

and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative ] 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CPlOGLOOl 1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

One Research Cotirt, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Glenn L, Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Federj^ Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

DesPlaines,IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7063 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

m 

II 

II 

P
#### § 105-74.635 Drug-free workplace.

*Drug-free workplace* means a site for the performance of work done in connection with a specific award at which employees of the recipient are prohibited from engaging in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000005656
<NAME>                                         American Precious Metals, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               675
<PP&E>                                         11,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (473)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          40,711
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,937
<OTHER-SE>                                     (35,879)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,769
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (10,142)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,142)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)



</TABLE>
No. 10-10734.

#### Cobb *v.*Mendoza-Powers, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7570** 

LEROY A. MATTHEWS, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

– Appellee , and SOUTH CAROLINA, State of , Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 00619

- DCN )

Submitted : February 27, 2014 Decided: March 4 , 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Leroy A. Matthews, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee

. Unpublished opinions are not binding prece dent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Leroy A. Matthews, Jr **.,** seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit j ustice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S . 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Matthews has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of American Science & Engineering, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge and
belief, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Paul Theodore Owens
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | 
|February 14, 2003                           |  | 

---

QuickLinks
### Streamflow gains and losses in the Snake River and ground-water budgets for the Snake River plain, Idaho and eastern Oregon

By: L.C. Kjelstrom

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1408C

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Streamflow gains and losses in the Snake River and ground-water budgets for the Snake River Plain, Idaho and eastern Oregon(1992)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO. 22-cv-24013-RNS 

CHENMING ZHOU, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED 

ON SCHEDULE “A”, 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________________/ 

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF STRIKING DOCKET ENTRY NO. 113

Plaintiff Chenming Zhou (“Plaintiff”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files 

its Notice of Striking Docket Entry No. 113 as it included an incorrect Exhibit. The correct 

document being filed subsequent to this filing. 

Respectfully Submitted this June 6, 2023. 

LAW FIRM OF RUBIO & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

8950 SW 74 Ct., Suite 1804 

Miami, Fl 33156 

Telephone: (786) 220-2061 

Facsimile: (786) 220-2062 

Email: hrubio@rubiolegal.com 

Email: frubio@rubiolegal.com 

Email: info@rubiolegal.com 

By:/s/ Humberto Rubio 

Humberto Rubio, Jr., Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 36433 

Felipe Rubio, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 123059 

Case 1:22-cv-24013-RNS Document 114 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 105-56.021 Notice. ( a ) Before offsetting a salary payment, the disbursing official, or the paying agency on behalf of the disbursing official, will notify the Federal employee in writing of the date deductions from salary will commence and of the amount of such deductions.
( b ) ( 1 ) When an offset occurs under this subpart, the disbursing official, or the paying agency on behalf of the disbursing official, will notify the Federal employee in writing that an offset has occurred including— ( i ) A description of the payment and the amount of offset taken;
( ii ) The identity of GSA as the creditor agency requesting the offset; and
( iii ) A contact point within GSA that will handle concerns regarding the offset.
( 2 ) The information described in paragraphs (b)(1)(ii) and (b)(1)(iii) of this section does not need to be provided to the Federal employee when the offset occurs if such information was included in a prior notice from the disbursing official or paying agency.
( c ) The disbursing official will advise GSA of the names, mailing addresses, and taxpayer identifying numbers of the debtors from whom amounts of past-due, legally enforceable debt were collected and of the amounts collected from each debtor for GSA. The disbursing official will not advise GSA of the source of payment from which the amounts were collected.
the law or a clearly erroneous application of a law or rule" (internal

quotations, brackets, and citations omitted)); State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Riker), 121 Nev. 225, 233, 112 P.3d 1070, 1075 (2005) (concluding that "extraordinary relief is not warranted for routine correction of errors that a district court may make," and "[t]hat the [prosecution], or even this court, might disagree with the district court's conclusion is not a reason to seek extraordinary relief as long as the district court has made a reasonable effort to follow the applicable law"); Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 603-04, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981) ("Mandamus will not lie to control discretionary action unless discretion is manifestly abused or is exercised arbitrarily or capriciously." (internal citation omitted)). We are not convinced that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted, see Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677,818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (holding that the decision to entertain a writ of mandamus is within this court's sole discretion), particularly where the matter is remanded for a new trial.

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Saitta

I CACI

Pickering cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Las Vegas City Attorney Las Vegas City Attorney/Criminal Division Law Offices of John G. Watkins Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A
No. 91-1944.

#### Useden, Trustee of the Air Florida System, Inc., Profit Sharing Plan and Trust *v.*Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Gilbert Hu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of AltiGen
Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen
Communications, Inc.

| |  | By:    |  | /s/ Gilbert Hu         
| |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | Gilbert Hu             
| |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

---

QuickLinks