alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 24.6****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mark A.Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full powerof substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical PartnersInternational, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposesas he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of saidattorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.              /s/ Boone Powell, Jr.   Boone Powell, Jr.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 28, 2017

Order 

Clerk

July 28, 2017

155983(94)

DODA NICAJ and AGA NICAJ,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, and

DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER and WAYNE

STATE UNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS GROUP,

Intervening-Plaintiffs-Appellees

SC: 155983

v COA: 329486

Wayne CC: 13-014246-NF

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

and

TRAVELERS CASUALTY INSURANCE

COMPANY OF AMERICA, d/b/a TRAVELERS

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time 

for filing its answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer 

submitted on July 25, 2017, is accepted for filing.
#### § 102-74.150 Who submits prospectuses for the construction or alteration of public buildings to the Congressional committees?

The Administrator of General Services must submit prospectuses for public building construction or alteration projects to the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure for approval.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier: 2012** 

**- NM** 
**- 097** 

**- AD** 

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
§ 301-10.136 What exceptions to the Fly America Act requirements apply when I travel between the United States and another country? The exceptions are: ( a ) If a U.S. flag air carrier offers nonstop or direct service (no aircraft change) from your origin to your destination, you must use the U.S. flag air carrier service unless such use would extend your travel time, including delay at origin, by 24 hours or more.
( b ) If a U.S. flag air carrier does not offer nonstop or direct service (no aircraft change) between your origin and your destination, you must use a U.S. flag air carrier on every portion of the route where it provides service unless, when compared to using a foreign air carrier, such use would: ( 1 ) Increase the number of aircraft changes you must make outside of the U.S. by 2 or more; or
( 2 ) Extend your travel time by at least 6 hours or more; or
( 3 ) Require a connecting time of 4 hours or more at an overseas interchange point.
# Comments on: 17-2234: HUDICK v. WILKIE [OPINION], Nonprecedential
EXHIBIT 23




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-127022) pertaining to the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2005 Stock Plan of Overhill Farms, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-130921) of our report dated December 15, 2011, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Overhill Farms, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 2,  2011.




/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPLos Angeles, CaliforniaDecember 15, 201
No. 10-11098.

#### McCreary *v.*Skolnik et al.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
§ 109-1.106-50 Applicability of FPMR/FMR and DOE-PMR. ( a ) The FPMR/FMR and DOE-PMR apply to all direct operations.
( b ) The DOE-PMR does not apply to facilities and activities conducted under Executive Order 12344 (Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program) and Public Law 98-525.
( c ) Unless otherwise provided in the appropriate part or subpart, the FPMR/FMR and DOE-PMR apply to designated contractors.
( d ) The Procurement Executive or head of a contracting activity may designate contractors other than designated contractors to which the FPMR/FMR and DOE-PMR apply.
( e ) Program Secretarial Officers and other DOE elements are responsible to identify the contracts that involve the life-cycle management of personal property assets. The respective program's Head of Contracting Activity is responsible to issue direction to Contracting Officers to incorporate any and all applicable requirements of the FPMR/FMR and DOE-PMR and any supplemental Program Office guidance into contracts identified with life-cycle management of personal property.
( f ) Principal authority and responsibility for the administration of DOE personal property in the custody of its contractors rest with the responsible Contracting Officer.
( g ) The FPMR/FMR and DOE-PMR shall be used by contracting officers in the administration of applicable contracts, and in the review, approval, or appraisal of such contractor operations.
( h ) Regulations for the management of Government property in the possession of other DOE contractors are contained in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), 48 CFR part 45, and in the DOE Acquisition Regulation (DEAR), 48 CFR part 945.
( i ) Regulations for the management of personal property held by financial assistance recipients are contained in the DOE Financial Assistance Rules (10 CFR part 600) 2 CFR parts 200 and 910 and DOE Order 534.1, Accounting.
§ 102-75.990 May Federal agencies abandon, destroy, or donate to public bodies real property? Yes, subject to the restrictions in this subpart, any Federal agency having control of real property that has no commercial value or for which the estimated cost of continued care and handling exceeds the estimated proceeds from its sale, may— ( a ) Abandon or destroy Government-owned improvements and related personal property located on privately-owned land;
( b ) Destroy Government-owned improvements and related personal property located on Government-owned land (abandonment of such property is not authorized); or
( c ) Donate to public bodies any Government-owned real property (land and/or improvements and related personal property), or interests therein.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 840 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 840

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit the admission to 
  the United States of nonimmigrant students and visitors who are the 
 spouses and children of United States permanent resident aliens, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1999

 Mr. Pallone introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit the admission to 
  the United States of nonimmigrant students and visitors who are the 
 spouses and children of United States permanent resident aliens, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADMISSION OF CERTAIN ``B'' AND ``F'' VISA NONIMMIGRANTS WHO 
              ARE SPOUSES OR CHILDREN OF UNITED STATES PERMANENT 
              RESIDENT ALIENS.

    Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182) 
is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:
    ``(r)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no alien--
            ``(A) who is--
                    ``(i) the spouse or child of an alien lawfully 
                admitted for permanent residence to the United States; 
                and
                    ``(ii) not eligible to enter the United States as 
                an immigrant except by reason of being such a spouse or 
                child; and
            ``(B) who seeks admission to the United States for purposes 
        of visiting the permanent resident spouse or parent or for 
        studying in the United States; and
            ``(C) who is otherwise qualified;
may be denied issuance of a visa, or may be denied admission to the 
United States, as a nonimmigrant alien described in section 
101(a)(15)(B) who is coming to the United States temporarily for 
pleasure or as a nonimmigrant alien described in section 101(a)(15)(F).
    ``(2) Whenever an alien described in paragraph (1) seeks admission 
to the United States as a nonimmigrant alien described in section 
101(a)(15)(B) who is coming temporarily for pleasure or as a 
nonimmigrant alien described in section 101(a)(15)(F), the fact that a 
petition has been filed on the alien's behalf for classification of the 
alien as an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence shall not 
constitute evidence of the alien's intention to abandon his or her 
foreign residence.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7737
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TIMOTHY GADSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (5:01-cr-0084-CMC-1) Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 22, 2006 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Gadson, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Timothy Gadson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gadson , No. 5:01-cr-00084- CMC-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 301-51.203 What must I do about my advance if my trip is canceled or postponed indefinitely?

Promptly notify the appropriate agency officials and refund any monies advanced in connection with the authorized travel.
# Comments on: 21-2033: KRISTOF v. AIR FORCE [OPINION], Nonprecedential
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use of our report dated January 20, 1998, included in the 
1997 Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) of DAOU Systems, Inc. for the year ended 
December 31, 1997. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the 
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-40393) pertaining to the 1996 
Stock Option Plan of DAOU Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 20, 1998, 
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of DAOU Systems, Inc. 
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 
1997.


San Diego, California                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP
March 9, 1998
# Comments on: 2021-1532: Apple Inc. v. MPH Technologies Oy
#### § 109-38.202 Tags.
[Letterhead of Anderson Associates, LLP]





                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.
1301 Merritt Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland  21222


     We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements
(No. 333-13975,  333-49908 and 333-68260) on Form S-8 of Patapsco Bancorp,  Inc.
of our report dated August 27, 2001, relating to the consolidated  statements of
financial  condition of Patapsco  Bancorp,  Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30,
2001, and the related  consolidated  statements of income,  stockholders' equity
and cash flows for the year then  ended,  which  report  appears in the June 30,
2001 Annual Report of Form 10-KSB of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.


                                                 /s/ Anderson Associates, LLP



Baltimore, Maryland
September 24, 2001
#### § 105-68.900 Adequate evidence.

*Adequate evidence* means information sufficient to support the reasonable belief that a particular act or omission has occurred.
#### Kevin HOWARD, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Robert COUPE, Commissioner, Department of Correction, Perry Phelps, Chief, Bureau of Prisons, and David Pierce, Warden, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Defendants Below, Appellees.

No. 335, 2016

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: July 12, 2016

Decided: September 7, 2016

Court Below—Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. 10307

DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRESCOM INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,020
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,588
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,524
<PP&E>                                          30,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,323
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           493
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,829
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,610
<SALES>                                        139,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               139,621
<CGS>                                          106,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (3,043)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,621)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,956
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,577)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.50)


</TABLE>
# Comments on: 2020-2206: Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Hirshfeld
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT PIERCE DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-80201-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CARMEN MARIA REYES-CARRASQUILLO,

Defendant.

/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation entered by 

Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart Following Change of Plea Hearing [ECF No. 34]. On 

February 22, 2023, Magistrate Judge Reinhart held a Change of Plea hearing [ECF No. 32] during 

which Defendant pled guilty to Counts 1 and 8 of the Indictment pursuant to a written plea 

agreement and factual proffer statement [ECF No. 33]. Magistrate Judge Reinhart thereafter 

issued a Report recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to Counts 1 and 8 of 

the Indictment, that the Court find Defendant to have freely and voluntarily entered her guilty plea, 

and that the Court adjudicate her guilty of Counts 1 and 8 [ECF No. 34]. Neither party has filed 

objections to the Report, and the time to do so has expired. 

The Court has conducted a review of the record and finds no error in the Report. Therefore, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 34] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. The guilty plea entered into by Defendant Carmen Maria Reyes-Carrasquillo as to 

Counts 1 and 8 of the Indictment is ACCEPTED. 

Case 9:22-cr-80201-AMC Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/13/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-80201-CR-CANNON

2

3. Defendant Carmen Maria Reyes-Carrasquillo is adjudicated guilty of Counts 1 and 

8 of the Indictment. Count 1 charges her with conspiracy to distribute and to possess 

with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 

846, and 841(b)(1)(A)(ii)(II). Count 8 charges her with possession with intent to 

distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 

(b)(1)(B)(ii)(II) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 [ECF No. 10]. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 13th day of March

2023.

________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cr-80201-AMC Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/13/2023 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6351

JOHN HENRY JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden, Federal Prison Camp, Cumberland, MD, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:04-cv-03414-AW) Submitted: July 17, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Henry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale, James A. Frederick, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: John Henry Johnson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Dewalt , No. 8:04-cv-03414-AW (D. Md. filed Dec. 22, 2005; entered Dec. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. AFFIRMED
#### § 301-52.16 What must I do with any unused tickets, coupons, or other evidence of refund?

You must submit any unused tickets, coupons, or other evidence of refund to your agency in accordance with your agency's procedures.

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15969, Apr. 1, 1998; 63 FR 35538, June 30, 1998]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 643 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 643

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To redesignate the Federal building located at 10301 South Compton 
  Avenue, in Los Angeles, California, and known as the Watts Finance 
      Office, as the ``Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 643

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To redesignate the Federal building located at 10301 South Compton 
  Avenue, in Los Angeles, California, and known as the Watts Finance 
      Office, as the ``Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 10301 South Compton Avenue, in Los 
Angeles, California, and known as the Watts Finance Office, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States to the Federal building referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Augustus F. 
Hawkins Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 302-2.14 Am I required to sign a service agreement for an appointment or transfer CONUS or Outside the Continental United States (OCONUS), renewal agreement travel, or assignment under the Government Employees Training Act (GETA), and what is the minimum period of service? Yes, you are required to sign a service agreement for appointment or transfer CONUS or OCONUS, renewal agreement travel, or assignment under GETA. The minimum periods of service are: ( a ) Within CONUS for a period of service of not less than 12 months following the effective date of your appointment or transfer;
( b ) OCONUS for an agreed upon period of service of not more than 36 months or less than 12 months following the effective date of your appointment or transfer;
( c ) Department of Defense Overseas Dependent School System teachers for a period of not less than one school year as determined under chapter 25 of Title 20, United States Code;
( d ) For renewal agreement travel, a period of not less than 12 months from the date of return to the same or different overseas official station; and
( e ) For assignment under GETA, not less than three times the length of the training period as prescribed by the head of your agency.
[86 FR 73680, Dec. 28, 2021]
#### § 302-10.2 Are there any eligibility requirements?

Yes, to have a mobile home transported at Government expense, you must certify that the mobile home will be used at the new official station as your primary residence and/or the primary residence of your immediate family.