alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AmeriCorps
Seniors

O

SERVING
HERE

———
SS
SS
—— SS

With more than 200,000 Americans serving nationwide,
AmeriCorps brings people together to tackle some of
the nation’s most pressing challenges through national

service and volunteering.

Apply to serve at AmeriCorps.gov


SERVING
HERE

With more than 200,000 Americans serving nationwide,
AmeriCorps brings people together to tackle some of
the nation’s most pressing challenges through national

service and volunteering.

Apply to serve at AmeriCorps.gov


SERVING
HERE

With more than 200,000 Americans serving nationwide,
AmeriCorps brings people together to tackle some of
the nation’s most pressing challenges through national

service and volunteering.

Apply to serve at AmeriCorps.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 672 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 672

  To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from issuing regulations 
                   dealing with hybrid transactions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1999

 Mr. Crane (for himself and Mr. Matsui) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from issuing regulations 
                   dealing with hybrid transactions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HYBRID TRANSACTIONS UNDER SUBPART F.

    (a) Prohibition on Regulations.--The Secretary of the Treasury (or 
his delegate)--
            (1) shall not issue temporary or final regulations relating 
        to the treatment of hybrid transactions under subpart F of part 
        III of subchapter N of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986 pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Notice 98-35 or 
        any other regulations reaching the same or similar result as 
        such notice,
            (2) shall retroactively withdraw any regulations described 
        in paragraph (1) which were issued after the date of such 
        notice and before the date of the enactment of this Act, and
            (3) shall not modify or withdraw sections 301.7701-1 
        through 301.7701-3 of the Treasury Regulations (relating to the 
        classification of certain business entities) in a manner which 
        alters the treatment of hybrid transactions under such subpart 
        F.
    (b) Study and Report.--The Secretary of the Treasury (or his 
delegate) shall study the tax treatment of hybrid transactions under 
such subpart F and submit a report to the Committee on Ways and Means 
of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the 
Senate. The Secretary shall hold at least one public hearing to receive 
comments from any interested party prior to submitting such report.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 109-48.101 Forfeited or voluntarily abandoned property.
March 25, 2014

Robert A. Wright President Wright Aviation Sol utions, L LC 910 Harris Avenue Suite 401 Bellingham, WA 98225 Kent Ewing President Bonanza/Baron Pilot Training, Inc. 1509 Duke of Windsor Road Virginia Beach, VA 23454 Dear Mr. Wright and Mr. Ewing : This is in response to y our January 27, 2014, letter sent to the public docket ( No. FAA - 2014 - 0048 ) petitioning on behalf of Wright Aviation Solutions L LC (Wright Aviation) and Bonanza/Baron Pilot Training, Inc. ( Bonanza/Baron ) . Your letter request s the Federal Aviation Administration revise Advisory Circular (AC) 61.91J “WI NGS ” - Pilot Proficiency Program to enable expanded options under the FAA ’s Pilot Proficiency Program, WI

NGS. C hange s or amendment s to a dvisory c ircular s are not processed in accordance with 14 CFR part 11. We have forwarded y our request to the Flight Standards Service, General Aviation and Commercial Division (AFS
- 800) for review and response . Docket No. FAA
- 2014 - 0048 will be closed with no further action taken. If y ou have any

questions regarding this issue , please contact Valerie Palazzolo , Manager, FAA Safety

Team (AFS
- 850) at (202) 385 - 9594 . Sincerely , //s// Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
No. 11-9211.

#### Massey *v.*Johnson, Warden, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Moscow CableCom Corp. for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

·

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Moscow CableCom Corp..

/s/            Mikhail SmirnovName:     Mikhail Smirnov
Title:       Chief Executive Officer 
Date:       November 14, 2005



/s/            Andrew M. OShea

Name:      Andrew M. OShea

Title:        Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Date:

November 14, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5637 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5637

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To provide that an amount available for fiscal year 2001 for the 
 Department of Transportation shall be available to reimburse certain 
 costs incurred for clean-up of former Coast Guard facilities at Cape 
May, New Jersey, and to authorize the Coast Guard to transfer funds and 
  authority for demolition and removal of a structure at former Coast 
               Guard property in Traverse City, Michigan.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5637

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To provide that an amount available for fiscal year 2001 for the 
 Department of Transportation shall be available to reimburse certain 
 costs incurred for clean-up of former Coast Guard facilities at Cape 
May, New Jersey, and to authorize the Coast Guard to transfer funds and 
  authority for demolition and removal of a structure at former Coast 
               Guard property in Traverse City, Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COSTS OF CLEAN-UP OF CAPE MAY LIGHTHOUSE.

    Of the funds made available in the Department of Transportation and 
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001 for environmental compliance 
and restoration of Coast Guard facilities, $100,000 shall be available 
to reimburse the owner of the former Coast Guard lighthouse facility at 
Cape May, New Jersey, for costs incurred for clean-up of lead 
contaminated soil at that facility.

SEC. 2. DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF BUILDING AT FORMER COAST GUARD 
              PROPERTY IN TRAVERSE CITY, MICHIGAN.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and subject to the 
availability of funds appropriated specifically for the project, the 
Coast Guard is authorized to transfer funds in an amount not to exceed 
$200,000 and project management authority to the Traverse City Area 
Public School District for the purposes of demolition and removal of 
the structure commonly known as ``Building 402'' at former Coast Guard 
property located in Traverse City, Michigan, and associated site work. 
No such funds shall be transferred until the Coast Guard receives a 
detailed, fixed price estimate from the School District describing the 
nature and cost of the work to be performed, and the Coast Guard shall 
transfer only that amount of funds it and the School District consider 
necessary to complete the project.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Ray LLOYD, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

No. 361, 2016

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: September 2, 2016

Decided: September 8, 2016

Corrected: September 28, 2016

Court Below—Common Pleas of the State of Delaware, Cr. ID No. 1505001567

DISMISSED.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Warren L. Mobley, President and Chief Executive Officer of Moscow CableCom Corp., certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Moscow CableCom Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)       Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and;

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  May 16, 2005



/s/    Warren L. Mobley

Warren L. Mobley

President and Chief Executive Officer
February 22, 1979

404 A.2d 1353

#### Commonwealth v. John Christian Smith, Appellant.

Submitted April 10, 1978.

Louis R. Dadowski, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Charles W. Johns, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

JACOBS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
No. 10-10998.

#### Yanez-Hernandez *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 109-26.501-54 Communications equipment.

Communications equipment considered to be essential for the accomplishment of security and safety responsibilities is exempt from the requirements of 41 CFR 101-26.501. The Fleet Manager shall approve the installation of communications equipment in motor vehicles.
#### § 301-10.266 Is information available to the public about travel on Government aircraft by senior Federal officials and non-Federal travelers?

Yes, an agency that authorizes travel on Government aircraft and an agency that owns or hires Government aircraft must make records about travelers on those aircraft available to the public in response to written requests under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), except for portions exempt from disclosure under that Act (such as classified information).

[FTR Amdt. 2004-02, 69 FR 34304, June 21, 2004]
#### § 301-70.703 If we grant an exemption, does that prevent the employee from using the card on a voluntary basis?

No, an exemption from use would not prevent the employee from using the Government contractor-issued travel charge card for official travel expenses on a voluntary basis in accordance with your policies.
I

★★

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 777

To amend the Job Training Partnership Act and the Workforce Investment

Act of 1998 to require that a minimum percentage of participants in

summer youth employment programs carried out under those Acts are

students who have high attendance rates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. FATTAH (for himself, Mr. SANDLIN, and Mr. VENTO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the

Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Job Training Partnership Act and the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to require that a minimum

percentage of participants in summer youth employment

programs carried out under those Acts are students who

have high attendance rates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 777 IH2S

1 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT THAT MINIMUM PERCENTAGE

2 OF PARTICIPANTS IN SUMMER YOUTH EM3 PLOYMENT PROGRAMS UNDER THE JOB

4 TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT AND THE

5 WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT OF 1998 ARE

6 STUDENTS WITH HIGH ATTENDANCE RATES.

7 (a) AMENDMENTS TO JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP

8 ACT.—

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 254 of the Job

10 Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. 1633) is

11 amended by adding at the end the following:

12 ‘‘(e) REQUIREMENT THAT MINIMUM PERCENTAGE

13 OF PARTICIPANTS ARE STUDENTS WITH HIGH ATTEND14 ANCE RATES.—Not less than 90 percent of the partici15 pants in the program under this part in each service deliv16 ery area shall be individuals who are students and who

17 have a 90 percent or higher school attendance rate, as de18 termined by the applicable school.’’.

19 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 254

20 of the Job Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C.

21 1633), as amended by paragraph (1), is further

22 amended by redesignating the second subsection (c)

23 (as added by section 1016(a)(2)(C) of the Goals

24 2000: Educate America Act) as subsection (d).

25 (b) AMENDMENT TO WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT

26 OF 1998.—Section 129(c) of the Workforce Investment
3

HR 777 IH2S

1 Act of 1998 is amended by adding at the end the follow2 ing:

3 ‘‘(9) REQUIREMENT THAT MINIMUM PERCENT4 AGE OF PARTICIPANTS IN SUMMER EMPLOYMENT

5 PROGRAMS ARE STUDENTS WITH HIGH ATTENDANCE

6 RATES.—Not less than 90 percent of the partici7 pants in a summer employment program carried out

8 under this chapter in each local area shall be indi9 viduals who are students and who have a 90 percent

10 or higher school attendance rate, as determined by

11 the applicable school.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       State or Other
                                                                       Jurisdiction of              Percentage
                                                                       Incorporation                Ownership
                                                                       ---------------              ----------
<S>                                                                    <C>                            <C>
Parent
------

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.                                                 Maryland                          --

Subsidiary (1)
----------

The Patapsco Bank                                                      Maryland                       100%

Subsidiaries of The Patapsco Bank (1)
---------------------------------

PFSL Holding Corp.                                                     Maryland                       100%

Prime Business Leasing                                                 Maryland                      100%

Patapsco Financial Services, Inc.                                      Maryland                      100%

<FN>

(1)      The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included
         in the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report
         to Stockholders attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
</FN>
</TABLE>
§ 102-2.30 Where and in what formats is the FMR published? Proposed rules are published in the Federal Register. FMR bulletins are published in looseleaf format. FMR interim and final rules are published in the following formats— ( a ) Federal Register under the “Rules and Regulations” section.
( b ) Loose-leaf. (See § 102-2.35.)
( c ) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), which is an annual codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register. The CFR is available on line and in a bound-volume format.
( d ) Electronically on the Internet.
#### Nathan Benderson, Respondent, v Computer Task Group, Inc., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[629 NYS2d 690]

—Appeal from order and judgment insofar as it granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment unanimously dismissed *(see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy,*140 AD2d 988) and order and judgment affirmed with costs. Same Memorandum as in *Benderson v Computer Task Group*(216 AD2d 922 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
SERVED NOVEMBER 1, 2011 ^PARlMENTOF 

?;v-\NSP0RW10M 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION' JACKET OPERAllOHS 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC ^QJI i^QV - 2 P '-J: H 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ARMORCOATUSA 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-201]-0781 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2010NM710045) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Yoder *" 

Chief Administrative Law 

Attachment - Sei^/ice List 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-078 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Richard A. Reep, Respondent's Counsel 

Reep Bell & Laird, P.C. 

2955 Stockyard Road 

P.O.Box 16960 

Missoula, MT 59808-6960 

TEL; 406-541-4100 

FAX: 406-541-4101 

Kyle E. Loniazow, Compkiinani's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For ser\'ice in person or by expedited courier, use Uie following address: Federal 

Avialion Adininistration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wrighl Building—Suile 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Atlention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430. 

- 2 -
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofWyeth (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2006 (the Report), I, Robert Essner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

 

Dated: November 6, 2006
No. 11-9227.

#### Garner *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.