UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 

18 U.S.C. § 1349 

18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

vs. 

DEREK JAMES ACREE, 

Defendant. 

/ 

INFORMATION

The United States Attorney charges that: 

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 

At all times relevant to this Information: 

The Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program 

1. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was a federal

law enacted in or around March 2020 and designed to provide emergency financial assistance to 

Americans suffering economic harm from the COVID-19 pandemic. 

2. The Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) program was a U.S. Small Business

Administration (SBA) program that existed before the COVID-19 pandemic to provide lowinterest financing to small business, renters, and homeowners in regions affected by declared 

disasters. 

3. The CARES Act authorized the SBA to provide EIDLs to eligible small businesses

experiencing substantial financial disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to obtain 

a COVID-19 EIDL, a qualifying business was required to submit an EIDL application to the SBA 

22-80157-Cr-Singhal/McCabe

TM Sep 27, 2022 West Palm Beach

Case 9:22-cr-80157-AHS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2022 Page 1 of 11
2 

and provide information about its operations, such as the number of employees, gross revenues, 

and the cost of goods sold for the 12-month period preceding January 31, 2020. The applicant was 

also required to certify that all of the information in the application was true and correct to the best 

of the applicant's knowledge. In addition, the CARES Act authorized the SBA to issue advances 

of up to $10,000 to small businesses within three days of applying for an EIDL. The amount of the 

advance was determined by the number of employees the applicant certified having. The advances 

did not have to be repaid. 

4. All EIDL applications were submitted online. All applications submitted on July 

11, 2020 or after were handled by an SBA contractor with servers located in Des Moines, Iowa. 

Prior to July 11, 2020, EIDL applications were submitted through three different servers, located 

in Boydton, VA, West Des Moines, IA, or Quincy, WA. 

5. EIDL applications were submitted directly to the SBA and processed by the SBA 

with support from a government contractor. The amount of the loan was determined based, in part, 

on the information provided in the application concerning the number of employees, gross 

revenues, and cost of goods sold. Any EIDL funds were issued directly by the SBA. 

The Paycheck Protection Program 

6. Another source of relief provided through the CARES Act was the authorization of 

forgivable loans to businesses for job retention and certain other expenses, through a program 

called the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). 

7. The PPP allowed qualifying small businesses and other organizations to receive 

PPP loans. Businesses were required to use PPP loan proceeds on payroll costs, interest on 

mortgages, rent, and utilities. The PPP allowed the interest and principal on the PPP loan to be 

entirely forgiven if the business spent the loan proceeds on these expense items within a designated 

period of time and used a certain percentage of the PPP loan proceeds on payroll expenses. 

Case 9:22-cr-80157-AHS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2022 Page 2 of 11
3 

8. The amount of a PPP loan that a small business was entitled to receive was 

determined by the number of employees employed by the business and the business’s average 

monthly payroll costs. 

9. To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business was required to submit a PPP loan 

application which was signed by an authorized representative of the business. The PPP loan 

application required the business (through its authorized representative) to acknowledge the 

program rules and make certain affirmative certifications to be eligible to obtain the PPP loan. In 

the PPP loan application, the small business (through its authorized representative) was required 

to state, among other things, its average monthly payroll expenses and number of employees. 

These figures were used to calculate the amount of money the small business was eligible to 

receive under the PPP. In addition, businesses applying for a PPP loan were required to provide 

documentation confirming their payroll expenses. 

10. A PPP loan application was processed by a participating lender. If a PPP loan 

application was approved, the participating lender funded the PPP loan using its own funds. While 

a participating lender issued the PPP loan, the loan was 100% guaranteed by the United States 

Small Business Administration, an executive branch agency of the United States government. 

The Defendant and Relevant Entities 

11. DEREK JAMES ACREE was a resident of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. 

12. NATIONAL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC., formerly National Financial 

Holdings LLC, was a Delaware corporation with a registered address in Wilmington, Delaware 

and a principal address in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. DEREK JAMES ACREE was the Chief 

Operating Officer of NATIONAL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. 

13. NFH FLORIDA LLC (“NFH FLORIDA”) was a Delaware limited liability 

company with a registered address in Wilmington, Delaware. 

Case 9:22-cr-80157-AHS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2022 Page 3 of 11
4 

14. NATIONAL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS TECHNOLOGY LLC, was a Delaware 

limited liability company with a registered address in Wilmington, Delaware. DEREK JAMES 

ACREE was the Chief Operating Officer of NATIONAL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS 

TECHNOLOGY LLC. 

Relevant Financial Institutions 

15. First Home Bank (“First Home”) was a federally insured financial institution 

headquartered in Saint Petersburg, Florida. 

16. Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) was a federally insured financial institution 

headquartered in Santa Clara, California. 

17. Truist Bank (“Truist”) was a federally insured financial institution headquartered 

in Charlotte, North Carolina. 

18. Flagler Bank (“Flagler”) was a federally insured financial institution headquartered 

in West Palm Beach, Florida. 

COUNT 1 

Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud 

18 U.S.C. § 1349 

1. The General Allegations section of this Indictment is re-alleged and incorporated 

by reference as though fully set forth herein. 

2. From in or around March 2020, and continuing through in or around August 2020, 

the exact dates being unknown, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and 

elsewhere, the defendant, 

DEREK JAMES ACREE, 

did willfully, that is, with the intent to further the object of the conspiracy, and knowingly combine, 

conspire, confederate, and agree with co-conspirator 1 to commit an offense against the United 

States, that is, to knowingly devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud and for 

Case 9:22-cr-80157-AHS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2022 Page 4 of 11
5 

obtaining money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and 

promises and to transmit and cause to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate 

commerce writings, signs, signals, and pictures for the purpose of executing such scheme and 

artifice, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. 

Purpose of the Conspiracy 

3. It was the purpose of the conspiracy for the conspirators to unlawfully enrich 

themselves and others by, among other things, submitting and causing the submission of false and 

fraudulent applications for EIDL and PPP loans and diverting the proceeds of those loans for the 

personal use and benefit of the Defendant and known and unknown conspirators and to further the 

conspiracy. 

Manner and Means of the Conspiracy 

The manner and means by which the defendant and his conspirators sought to accomplish 

the object and purpose of the conspiracy included, among others, the following: 

4. DEREK JAMES ACREE and co-conspirator 1 submitted and caused to be 

submitted an EIDL application on behalf NATIONAL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. This 

application sought approximately $509,900 in EIDL funds. The application was approved and 

funded by SBA. 

5. DEREK JAMES ACREE submitted and caused to be submitted a PPP loan 

application on behalf NATIONAL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. This application sought 

approximately $376,300 in PPP funds. The application was approved and funded by First Home 

Bank. 

6. DEREK JAMES ACREE submitted and caused to be submitted a PPP loan 

application on behalf of NFH FLORIDA LLC. This application sought approximately $376,400 

in PPP funds. The application was approved and funded by Truist Bank, formerly BB&T. 

Case 9:22-cr-80157-AHS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2022 Page 5 of 11
6 

7. DEREK JAMES ACREE submitted and caused to be submitted a PPP loan 

application on behalf of NATIONAL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS TECHNOLOGY LLC. This 

application sought approximately $349,955 in PPP funds. The application was approved and 

funded by Flagler Bank. 

8. Each application included false statements about the number of employees and the 

average monthly payroll or gross revenue. 

9. DEREK JAMES ACREE and co-conspirator 1 received approximately 

$1,612,555 in EIDL and PPP loan funds as a result of the false and fraudulent EIDL and PPP loan 

applications. 

10. DEREK JAMES ACREE and co-conspirator 1 spent much of the loan proceeds 

for their personal use and benefit, not for payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, or utilities. 

All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349. 

FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS 

1. The allegations of this Indictment are hereby realleged and by this reference fully 

incorporated herein for the purpose of alleging forfeiture to the United States of America of certain 

property in which the defendant DEREK JAMES ACREE has an interest. 

2. Upon conviction of a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 as 

alleged in this Information, the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States of America, any 

property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to such offense 

pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C). 

3. The property subject to forfeiture includes, but is not limited to, a forfeiture money 

judgment in the amount of approximately $869,682.83. 

Case 9:22-cr-80157-AHS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2022 Page 6 of 11
7 

5. If any of the property subject to forfeiture, as a result of any act or omission of the

defendant: 

a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;

c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;

d. has been substantially diminished in value; or

e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without

difficulty,

the United States of America shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property under the 

provisions of Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p). 

All pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and the procedures set 

forth in Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, as incorporated by Title 28, United States Code, 

Section 2461(c). 

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

ROBIN W. WAUGH

ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

ROBIN W WAUG

$OH[DQGUD&KDVHIRU

Case 9:22-cr-80157-AHS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2022 Page 7 of 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Court Division (select one)

Miami Key West FTP

CASE NO.: 

CERTIFICATE OF TRIAL ATTORNEY*

Superseding Case Information: 

New Defendant(s) (Yes or No)

Number of New Defendants

FTL WPB Total number of 1HZ&ounts 

I do hereby certify that:

 I have carefully considered the allegations of the indictment, the number of defendants, the number of probable

witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Information attached hereto.

 I am aware that the information supplied on this statement will be relied upon by the Judges of this Court in setting

their calendars and scheduling criminal trials under the mandate of the Speedy Trial Act, Title 28 U.S.C. §3161.

 Interpreter: (Yes or No)

List language and/or dialect:

4.

5. Please check appropriate category and type of offense listed below:

(Check only one) (Check only one)

I 0 to 5 days Petty

II 6 to 10 days Minor 

III 11 to 20 days Misdemeanor

IV 21 to 60 days Felony 

V 61 days and over 

 Has this case been previously filed in this District Court? (Yes or No)

If yes, Judge Case No.

 Has a complaint been filed in this matter? (Yes or No)

If yes, Magistrate Case No.

 Does this case relate to a previously filed matter in this District Court? (Yes or No)

If yes, Judge Case No.

 Defendant(s) in federal custody as of

 Defendant(s) in state custody as of

 5XOHIURPWKH  'LVWULFWRI

 ,VWKLVDSRWHQWLDOGHDWKSHQDOW\FDVH"<HVRU1R

 'RHVWKLVFDVHRULJLQDWHIURPDPDWWHUSHQGLQJLQWKH1RUWKHUQ5HJLRQRIWKH86$WWRUQH\¶V2IILFH

SULRUWR$XJXVW0DJ-XGJH6KDQLHN0D\QDUG"<HVRU1R

 'RHVWKLVFDVHRULJLQDWHIURPDPDWWHUSHQGLQJLQWKH&HQWUDO5HJLRQRIWKH86$WWRUQH\¶V2IILFH

SULRUWR2FWREHU0DJ-XGJH-DUHG6WUDXVV"<HVRU1R

By: ______________________________________ ________________

✔

✔

✔

This case will take 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

'(5(.-$0(6$&5((

'HIHQGDQW

________________________________/ 

Robin Waugh

Assistant United States Attorney

FLA Bar No. 0537837

1R

No

1R

No

No

No

No

days for the parties to try.

Case 9:22-cr-80157-AHS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2022 Page 8 of 11
*Refers only to possible term of incarceration, supervised release and fines. It does not include

restitution, special assessments, parole terms, or forfeitures that may be applicable.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Defendant's Name: 

PENALTY SHEET 

'(5(.-$0(6$&5((

Case No: 

Count #: 1 

:LUH)UDXG&RQVSLUDF\

Title 8, United States Code, Section 13

* Max. Term of Imprisonment: 2 years
 imprisonment

* Mandatory Min. Term of Imprisonment (if applicable):

* Max. Supervised Release: yearV
 supervised release

* Max. Fine: $250,000 fineRUWZLFHWKHJURVVORVVRUJURVVJDLQZKLFKFRXOGEHDVPXFKRI

DQGVSHFLDODVVHVVPHQWSOXVUHVWLWXWLRQ

*

Count #: 

* Max. Term of Imprisonment:

* Mandatory Min. Term of Imprisonment (if applicable):

* Max. Supervised Release:

* Max. Fine:

Count #: 

* Max. Term of Imprisonment:

* Mandatory Min. Term of Imprisonment (if applicable):

* Max. Supervised Release:

* Max. Fine:

Case 9:22-cr-80157-AHS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2022 Page 9 of 11
AO 455 (Rev. 01/09) Waiver of an Indictment

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

v. Case No.

Defendant

WAIVER OF AN INDICTMENT

I understand that I have been accused of one or more offenses punishable by imprisonment for more than one

year. I was advised in open court of my rights and the nature of the proposed charges against me.

After receiving this advice, I waive my right to prosecution by indictment and consent to prosecution by

information.

Date:

Defendant’s signature

Signature of defendant’s attorney

Printed name of defendant’s attorney

Judge’s signature

Judge’s printed name and title

 Southern District of Florida

Derek Acree

David Roth, Esquire

Case 9:22-cr-80157-AHS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2022 Page 10 of 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NUMBER: BBBBBBBBBBBBB

BOND RECOMMENDATION

DEFENDANT:

(Personal Surety) (Corporate Surety) (Cash) (Pre-Trial Detention)

By: ________________________________

AUSA:

Last Known Address:

What Facility:

Agent(s):

'(5(.-$0(6$&5((

3HUVRQDO6XUHW\%RQG

Robin Waugh

6$0LFKHOOH0F'DQLHO )%,

(FBI) (SECRET SERVICE) (DEA) (IRS) (ICE) (OTHER)

AUSA:

y: _______________________

AUSA: Robin Waugh

Case 9:22-cr-80157-AHS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2022 Page 11 of 11