alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 302-6.30 May my agency reduce my authorized number of TQSE days if I am authorized a househunting trip?

Your agency may reduce the total number of days you are authorized for TQSE by the number of househunting days (*e.g.,* instead of authorizing 60 days of TQSE your agency can authorize 50 days to account for your 10-day househunting trip); however, the percentage multiplier used for calculating TQSE may not be reduced based on the number of days used for a househunting trip.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 65 FR 38281, June 
20, 2000.

Previously Announced Time and Date of the Meeting: 12 noon, Monday, 
June 26, 2000.

Changes in the Meeting: Addition of the following closed item(s) to the 
meeting: Future capital framework.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: June 21, 2000.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-16148 Filed 6-21-00; 4:38 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
No. 10-11187.

#### Piphus *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
AMVESTORS FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES                  EXHIBIT 11
          CALCULATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
            (000's Omitted, except per share data)

                 For the Six Months Ended For the Quarter Ended
                                June 30, June 30,

                                       1997     1996      1997    1996

CALCULATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS
 PER SHARE

 Earnings for primary earnings
  per share ......................   $11,200    9,690    5,695   2,269
 Average number of shares
  outstanding ....................    13,265   11,506   13,291   12,838

 Dilutive effect of stock options
  and warrants after application
  of treasury stock method .......       559      580      634      736
 Average number of common shares
  and common equivalents
  outstanding ....................    13,824   12,086   13,925   13,574
 Primary earnings per share ......   $   .81      .80      .41      .17

CALCULATION OF FULLY DILUTED
 EARNINGS PER SHARE

 Earnings for fully diluted
  earnings per share .............   $11,200    9,690    5,695    2,269
 Add back interest expense on
  Subordinated debentures ........     1,861        -      929      -
 Earnings for fully diluted
  earnings per share .............   $13,061    9,690    6,624    2,269
 Shares used in calculating
  primary earnings per share .....    13,824   12,086   13,925   13,574

 Shares resulting from assumed
  conversion of Subordinated
  debentures .....................     3,796      -      3,796      -
 Additional dilutive effect of
  stock options and warrants after
  application of treasury stock
   method ........................       306      187      269       97
 Average number of common shares
  outstanding on a fully diluted
  basis ..........................    17,926   12,273   17,990   13,671
Fully diluted earnings per share .   $   .73      .79      .37      .17
87
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>                                      
     (Replace this text with legend, if applicable)
</LEGEND>                                     
<CIK>                                              0000006207
<NAME>                                             AMREP CORP. 
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
<CURRENCY>                                         U.S.DOLLARS
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                     MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       OCT-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                  1
<CASH>                                                       5,662
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               56,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                 98,016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                      29,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                             (12,635)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             198,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                     70,102
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                       740
<OTHER-SE>                                                  68,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               198,668
<SALES>                                                     37,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            67,637
<CGS>                                                       29,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               55,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           1,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              1,108
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   443
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            665
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   665
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        
 

</TABLE>
358P15

#### State v. Shawn Louis Goodman

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR (COAP14-917)

Dismissed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,756
<SECURITIES>                                     1,024
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                       956
<INVENTORY>                                     12,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,302
<PP&E>                                           9,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,637
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,775
<SALES>                                        104,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,784
<CGS>                                           78,021
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   644
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,558)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (802)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,721)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,756)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. QUINTEL AUGUSTINE, TILMON GOLPHIN, AND CHRISTINA WALTERS

From Cumberland County

No. 139PA13

ORDER

The trial court granted respondents’ motions for appropriate relief under the Racial Justice Act, N.C.G.S. §§ 15A-2010 to -2012 (2009) and N.C.G.S. §§ 15A-2010 to -2012 (2011 & Supp. 2012). After careful review, we conclude that the error recognized in this Court’s Order in *State v.*Robinson, _ N.C. _, _S.E.2d _ (2015) (411A94-5), infected the trial court’s decision, including its use of issue preclusion, in these cases. Accordingly, the trial court’s order is vacated. Furthermore, the trial court erred when it joined these three cases for an evidentiary hearing. These cases are therefore remanded to the senior resident superior court judge of Cumberland County for reconsideration of respondents’ motions for appropriate relief. *Cf.*Gen. R. Pract. Super. & Dist. Cts. 25(4), 2016 Ann. R. N.C. 22.

We express no opinion on the merits of respondents’ motions for appropriate relief at this juncture. On remand, the trial court should address petitioner’s constitutional and statutory challenges pertaining to the Act. In any new hearings on the merits, the trial court may, in the interest of justice, consider additional statistical studies presented by the parties. The trial court may also, in its discretion, appoint an expert under N.C. R. Evid. 706 to conduct a quantitative and qualitative study, unless such a study has already been commissioned pursuant to this Court’s Order in *Robinson,*in which case the trial court may consider that study. If the trial court appoints an expert under Rule 706, the Court hereby orders the Administrative Office of the Courts to make funds available for that purpose.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 15th day of December, 2015.

s/Jackson. J.

For the Court

Justice BEASLEY and Justice ERVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of these cases.

*595WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this 18th day of December, 2015

CHRISTIE S. CAMERON ROEDER Clerk of the Supreme Court

s/M.C. Hacknev Assistant Clerk
#### § 302-3.306 If I meet the conditions in § 302-3.307, what expenses am I allowed under separation for retirement travel?

If you meet the conditions in § 302-3.307, see Table G to § 302-3.101.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended at 86 FR 73684, Dec. 28, 2021]
§ 115-1.108 Agency implementation and supplementation of FPMR. ( a ) EPPMR implements and supplements the FPMR and follows the FPMR in style, arrangement and numbering sequence. Except to assure continuity and understanding FPMR material will not be repeated or paraphrased in the EPPMR.
( b ) Implementing material expands upon related material in the FPMR. Supplementing material deals with subject material not covered in the FPMR.
#### § 102-75.330 What form must all offers to purchase or lease be in?

All offers to purchase or lease must be in writing, accompanied by any required earnest money deposit, using the form prescribed by the disposal agency. In addition to the financial terms upon which the offer is predicated, the offer must set forth the willingness of the offeror to abide by the terms, conditions, reservations, and restrictions upon which the property is offered, and must contain such other information as the disposal agency may request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-62249CIV-DIMITROULEAS

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BRYAN PETROLEUM 104, LLC,

a Florida Limited Liability Company

d/b/a BP CONNECT,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice 

(the “Stipulation”) [DE 12], filed herein on March 3, 2023. The Court has carefully reviewed the 

Stipulation and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Stipulation [DE 12] is hereby APPROVED; 

2. The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs 

and fees except as otherwise agreed;

3. The Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement 

agreement; and

4. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY as moot any pending motions.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida on 

this 6th day of March 2023.

Case 0:22-cv-62249-WPD Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 0:22-cv-62249-WPD Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1338

RONALD SATISH EMRIT,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS (BIA); CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES (CIS); CUSTOMS AND BORDER PATROL (CBP); STATE DEPARTMENT; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS),
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. George Jarrod Hazel , District Judge. ( 8:22

- cv - 00623

- GJH )

Submitted : July 21, 2022 Decided: July 25, 2022

Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by un published per curiam opinion

.

Ronald Satish Emrit , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1338 Doc: 8 Filed: 07/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal
b rief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Emrit ’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment but modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. See Ali v. Hoga n , 26 F.4th 587, 600 (4th Cir. 2022) (explaining that “a dismissal for lack of standing

— or any other defect in subject matter jurisdiction

— must be one without prejudice” (cleaned up)) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1338 Doc: 8 Filed: 07/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
                               FDS - 3RD QUARTER
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0000006207
<NAME>                         AMREP CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
<CURRENCY>                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                 MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   JAN-31-2001
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1
<CASH>                            8,735
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    44,452
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                      74,719
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0
<PP&E>                           32,245
<DEPRECIATION>                   15,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  160,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 0
<BONDS>                           5,126
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                            740
<OTHER-SE>                       88,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    160,449
<SALES>                          11,990
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 51,632
<CGS>                             9,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    44,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                2,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (3,059)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (4,724)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               1,665
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                      1,665
<EPS-BASIC>                         .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .25



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company'sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

Date: 9 November 2005                                                           

 

                                                                                        /s/ Travis Engen                               

                                                                                         TravisEngen

President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 302-16.104 Must I document my miscellaneous expenses to receive reimbursement?

You must show documentation of your miscellaneous expenses only when an amount exceeds that prescribed in § 302-16.102.

[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-02, 76 FR 35111, June 16, 2011]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
OPIsystems Inc. of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, an exclusive license to 
U.S. Patent Number 5,646,404, issued July 8, 1997, entitled 
``Electronic Grain Probe Insect Counter (EGPIC)''. Notice of 
Availability to Serial Number 08/390,834 was published in the Federal 
Register on April 19, 1995.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 20, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, 4-1158, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights to 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as OPIsystems Inc. submitted a 
complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective 
exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the 
terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective 
exclusive license may be granted unless, within sixty (60) days from 
the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service 
receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant 
of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard M. Parry, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-15627 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
No. 10-10912.

#### Blake *v.*Maley.

Ct. App. La., 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### § 301-31.14 May I receive a travel advance for transportation and/or subsistence expenses?

Yes, you may receive a travel advance under § 301-51.200 of this chapter for up to a 30-day period at a time to cover expenses allowable. Your travel advance may not exceed the maximum allowable amount authorized under § 301-31.10, and you will be required to reimburse your agency for any portion of the advance disallowed or not spent.
§ 301-10.264 What amount must the Government be reimbursed for travel on Government aircraft? ( a ) No reimbursement is required for official travel on a Government aircraft.
( b ) For personal travel on Government aircraft, reimbursement depends upon which of the following special cases applies: ( 1 ) For any required use travel, you must reimburse the Government for the excess of the full coach fare for all flights taken over the full coach fare for the flights that you would have taken had you not engaged in personal activities during the trip, *i.e.,* for a wholly personal trip, you must pay the full coach fare for the entire trip;
( 2 ) For travel authorized under 10 U.S.C. 2648 and regulations implementing that statute, or when you or your dependents are stationed by the Government in a remote location with no access to regularly scheduled commercial airline service and are authorized to use Government aircraft, you do not have to reimburse the Government.
( c ) For political travel on a Government aircraft (*i.e.,* for any trip or part of a trip during which you engage in political activities), the Government must be reimbursed the excess of the full coach fare for all flights taken on the trip over the full coach fare for the flights that you would have taken had you not engaged in political activities, except if other law or regulation specifies a different amount (see, e.g., 11 CFR 106.3, “Allocation of Expenses between Campaign and Non-campaign Related Travel”), in which case the amount reimbursed is the amount required by such law or regulation.
Note to § 301-10.264 :
Except for required use travel, any use of Government aircraft for personal or political activities shall not cause an increase in the actual costs to the Government of operating the aircraft.
[FTR Amdt. 2004-02, 69 FR 34304, June 21, 2004, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2010-04, 75 FR 59095, Sept. 27, 2010]
#### § 102-79.50 What standard must Executive agencies promote in their utilization of space?

Executive agencies, when acquiring or utilizing Federally owned or leased space under Title 40 of the United States Code, must promote efficient utilization of space. Where there is no Federal agency space need, Executive agencies must make every effort to maximize the productive use of vacant space through the issuance of permits, licenses or leases to non-Federal entities to the extent authorized by law. (For vacant property determined excess to agency needs, refer to part 102-75, Real Property Disposal.)