alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Honeywell 

101 Columbia Road 

Morristown, NJ 07962 

Ms. Cindy Newberg 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

MC 6205J 

Washington, DC 20460 

Monday, June 13th, 2011 

Subject: SNAP EPA-HQ-OAR 2008-0664 HFO-1234yf LGWP MAC Refrigerant Packaging 

Dear Ms. Newberg 

Thank you for taking time this morning to discuss the HFO-1234yf SNAP Final Rule as it pertains to 

packaged cylinders and valves/fittings. It is our common understanding that the EPA Final Rule and SAE 

J639 and J2844 standards relate only to new passenger vehicle mobile air conditioning systems 

professional service, and not industrial transactions such as: internal inventory management and transfer, 

bulk packaging for OEM customers related to initial vehicle fill, and/or other industrial development activities. 

For cylinder sizes less than 50 pounds, Honeywell proposes the adoption of the Compressed Gas 

Association (CGA) 166 fitting, a 1.2” ACME Left Handed thread. This fitting has been approved by CGA, 

and the automotive industry through SAE International’s ICCC J-standards committees. The SAE J2844 

specification is currently being revised to accept the CGA 166 fitting and will be sent for balloting. 

For cylinders greater than 50 lbs, Honeywell proposes the adoption of the CGA 670 fitting, DIA 1.0” Left 

Hand Thread. Cylinders greater than 450 kg, including ISO’s have industrial fittings. 

To clarify the EPA’s position regarding cylinder sizes and fittings, could you please issue a determination 

regarding the following: 

• Minimum cylinder size acceptable for Mobile Air Conditioning professional service applications? 

• Maximum cylinder size considered MAC professional service? 

• Please clarify that cylinders utilized for OEM deliveries, industrial transfer, or other 

developmental activities are excluded from the requirements of the SNAP Final Rule. 

Thank you for your assistance, please contact me if you require any additional information 973-455-2956 

Best Regards 

Kenneth Horen 

Commercial Development 
Honeywell International 

101 Columbia Road, NIC-5 

Morristown, NJ 07962 

Kenneth.Horen@Honeywell.com
§ 102-192.65 What features must our finance systems have to keep track of mail expenditures? All agencies must have an accountable system for making postage payments; that is, a system that allocates postage expenses at the program level within the agency and makes program level managers accountable for obligating and tracking those expenses. The agency will have to determine the appropriate program level for this requirement because the level at which it is cost beneficial differs widely. The agency's finance systems should track all mail expenditures separately to the program level or below, and should— ( a ) Show expenses for postage and all other mail expenditures, payments to service providers, etc., separate from all other administrative expenses;
( b ) Allow mail centers to establish systems to charge their customers for mail expenditures; and
( c ) Identify and charge the mail expenditures that are part of printing contracts down to the program level.
§ 102-73.220 What types of special purpose space may the Department of the Treasury lease? The Department of the Treasury is delegated authority to lease the following types of special purpose space: ( a ) Space and land incidental thereto for the use of the Comptroller of the Currency, as well as the operation, maintenance and custody thereof (if unimproved, land may be leased only on a fiscal year basis; lease term for space, including all options, limited to 5 years).
( b ) Aerostat radar facilities necessary for U.S. Custom Service mission activities.
#### § 109-28.5003 Records.

Records of all EHFFP shall be maintained by the holding organization, including a listing of items with original date of classification as EHFFP; initial justifications for retaining EHFFP; rejustifications for retention; and documentation of reviews made by higher levels of management.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50827 Summary Calendar

CYRUS R. WARE; MILDRED WARE, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ET AL., Defendants, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (USDC No. SA-99-CV-548-OLG)

_______________________________________________________ March 16, 2001 Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *2



### Plaintiffs-appellants Cyrus and Mildred Ware seek to set aside the foreclosure against their family farm. We agree with the judgment of the district court that the statute of limitations has run. Whether their claim falls under 28 U.S.C. § 2409a or 28 U.S.C. § 2410, the limitations period has expired, and the Wares cannot maintain any claim against the government’s title. See Bank One Texas v. United States , 157 F.3d 397, 402 (5th Cir. 1998). AFFIRMED.
# Comments on: 23-121: In Re LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential
Produced and published at U.S. taxpayer expense

Return on Investment (ROI) 

Healthy Futures

Office of Research and Evaluation January 2024

Healthy Futures Programs Provide a Beneficial 

Return on Investment.

Healthy Futures is critical to how AmeriCorps ‘gets things done for 

America.’ AmeriCorps offers transformative resources, including 

funding and AmeriCorps members, to address pressing health 

challenges through national service, especially in underserved 

communities. 

AmeriCorps and its partners focused on Healthy Futures support the

health needs within communities, including mitigating public health 

crises, increasing access to care, supporting aging in place, and 

addressing childhood obesity. AmeriCorps members engage 

communities and share valuable resources to support Healthy Futures

across the country.

Return on investment (ROI) analyses help quantify a program’s 

benefits relative to its costs, assessing program performance and 

demonstrating value to stakeholders, while building the larger 

evidence base. Calculating ROI for AmeriCorps programs can entail

looking at benefits (relative to costs) experienced by: 

• AmeriCorps members, such as increases in their wages and 

educational attainment. 

• Government, such as increases in tax revenue and

programmatic savings. 

• Society, such as improvements in community health and 

maximization of community resources. 

Healthy Futures programs shift life courses. These programs not only 

demonstrate positive and healthy outcomes, they generate value

from the funding invested in these programs. In terms of ROI:

• AmeriCorps Seniors Foster Grandparent Program and Senior Companion Program generate a return of $3.50 

per funder dollar invested.

• AmeriCorps Urban Safety Program (Detroit) generates a return of $1.63 to $3.07 per funder dollar invested.

• Birth & Beyond Home Visitation Program generates a return of $0.50 to $2.11 per funder dollar invested.

About the Office of Research and Evaluation

The AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation assists AmeriCorps and its partners in collecting, analyzing, and disseminating 

data and insights about AmeriCorps programs and civic life in America.

About AmeriCorps

AmeriCorps, the federal agency for national service and volunteerism, provides opportunities for Americans to serve their country

domestically, address the nation’s most pressing challenges, improve lives and communities, and strengthen civic engagement. Each 

year, the agency places more than 200,000 AmeriCorps members and AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers in intensive service roles; and 

empowers millions more to serve as long-term, short-term, or one-time volunteers. Learn more at AmeriCorps.gov.
##### 



Exhibit 10.20(c)
 MANDATORY DISTRIBUTION AMENDMENT
 (For Use with PPD Plans)
 ARTICLE I
APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT
 1.1
    
    Effective Date. Unless a later effective date is specified in Article III of this
Amendment, the provisions of this Amendment will apply with respect to distributions made on
or after March 28, 2005.1.2
    
    Precedence. This Amendment supersedes any inconsistent provision of the Plan.1.3
    
    Adoption by prototype sponsor. Except as otherwise provided herein, pursuant to
authority granted by Section 5.01 of Revenue Procedure 2000-20, the sponsoring organization of
the prototype hereby adopts this amendment on behalf of all adopting employers.
 ARTICLE II
DEFAULT PROVISION: LOWER MANDATORY CASH-OUT
THRESHOLD TO $1,000
   ARTICLE III
EMPLOYERS ALTERNATIVE ELECTIONS
 3.1
    
    þ Effective Date of Plan AmendmentThis Amendment applies with respect to distributions made on or after November
1, 2005 (may be a date later than March 28, 2005, only if the terms of the Plan
already comply with Code Section 401(a)(31)(B)).3.2
    
    þ Election to implement automatic IRA rollover rulesIRA rollover of amounts over $1,000. In lieu of the default provision in
Article II of this Amendment, the provisions of the Plan concerning mandatory
distributions of amounts not exceeding $5,000 are amended as follows:In the event of a mandatory distribution greater than $1,000 that is made in
accordance with the provisions of the Plan providing for an automatic




---



##### 



distribution to a Participant without the Participants consent, if the Participant
does not elect to have such distribution paid directly to an eligible retirement
plan specified by the Participant in a direct rollover (in accordance with the
direct rollover provisions of the Plan) or to receive the distribution directly,
then the Administrator shall pay the distribution in a direct rollover to an
individual retirement plan designated by the Administrator.3.3
    
    o Election to modify mandatory distribution threshold (may not be elected if 3.2 above is
elected)In lieu of the default provision in Article II of this Amendment, the provisions of
the Plan that provide for the involuntary distribution of vested accrued benefits
of $5,000 or less, are modified as follows:
 a.
    
    o No mandatory distributions. Participant
consent to the distribution shall now be required before the distribution may
be made.
  [Sponsors signature and Adoption Date are on file with Sponsor]
 NOTE: The employer only needs to execute this Amendment if the employer has made an election in
Article III herein.
  Name of Plan:
    
    Allied Capital 401(k) Plan
 Name of Employer:
    
    Allied Capital Corporation
 By: s/Kelly A. Anderson
    
    Date:11/1/2005EMPLOYER
#### § 109-43.304-2 [Reserved]
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-11-0534 SAT Date: 9/27/2011 Print Date: 5/1/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1 Health: PMN ; Eco: intact material 2 3 Health: Incineratio/degradation product ; Eco: high concerfn for toxicity o incomplete incineration products to terrestrial organisms
Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 1 1 PMN 3 3 2 Incin Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; PMN slow; Incin Pdt rapid Keywords : Keywords: LUNG Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-11-0534 FATE:
S = Disp. VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0 Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > moSorption to soils/sediments = PMN strong; Incin Pdt low PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Incin Pdt P3B3 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN slow; Incin Pdt rapid

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin, nil through the lungs and GI tract as the neat material, and poor through the lungs and GI tract for the low molecular weight fraction when in solution based on physical/chemical p roperties. There is concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on changes of the natural surfactant balance in the lungs. Low moderate concern.
For the potential incomplete incineration product/degradation product, based on test data for the analogue concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral NOAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 males in the 90-day oral study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential for male reproductive toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity based on data for Moderate concern.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100 daphnid 48-h LC50 >100 green algal 96-h EC50 >100 fish

_ chronic value >10 daphnid

_ chronic value >10
algal

_ chronic value >10
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for polyanionic polymers based on SAR chemical class = p olyme r -anionic with mp < 20 C (P); S = dispersible in water based on effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations ; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern 1000( p pb) SARs p olyanionic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -anioicEcotox Category
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: Becky Jones
MANDATE

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-11-01088-CV

Tanglewood Homes Association, Inc. 

Appellant

v.

Stewart A. Feldman, Marla B. Feldman, 

and Michael T. Kelly, Trustee, Appellees

Appealed from the 80th District Court of 

Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2008-65420). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Busby. Chief 

Justice Frost also participating.

TO THE 80TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on April 30, 2014, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its 

order in these words:

This cause, a consolidated appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees 

and cross-appellants, Stewart A. Feldman, Marla B. Feldman, and Michael T. 

Kelly, Trustee, signed, December 22, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the 

record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore 

REVERSE the portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding monetary damages 

to Stewart A. Feldman, Marla B. Feldman, and Michael T. Kelly, Trustee, and we 

RENDER judgment that they take nothing on their causes of action seeking 

monetary damages. In addition, we REVERSE the portion of the trial court’s 

judgment awarding attorneys’ fees to Stewart A. Feldman, Marla B. Feldman, and 

Michael T. Kelly, Trustee, and RENDER judgment that they take nothing on their 

claims for attorneys’ fees. We AFFIRM the remainder of the judgment.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.
2

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said 

Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth 

Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, July 31, 

2015.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38596-38597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Shipbuilding Research Program 
(``NSRP'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 5, 2000, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Shipbuilding 
Research Program (``NSRP'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Cascade General, 
Inc., Portland, OR has been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and National Shipbuilding Research 
Program (``NSRP'') intends to file additional written notification 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 13, 1998, National Shipbuilding Research Program 
(``NSRP'') filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of 
the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal 
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on January 29, 1999 (64 FR 
4708).

[[Page 38597]]

    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 1, 
1999. A notice has not yet been published in the Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-15604 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-11227

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROSALINO SALGADO, also known as Chalino, also known as Miyagi, also 

known as Cocho,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-412-6

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Rosalino Salgado has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Salgado has filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-11227 Document: 00513882242 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
No. 15-11227

2

as Salgado’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-11227 Document: 00513882242 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Michael J. DeeName:

Michael J. DeeTitle:

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer


Date: September 25, 2007
No. 11-9407.

#### Chavez-Gonzalez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 751

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 504 Hamilton Street in Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Edward

N. Cahn Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 504 Hamilton Street in Allentown,

Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Edward N. Cahn Federal Building

and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United

5 States courthouse located at 504 Hamilton Street in Al6 lentown, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as

7 the ‘‘Edward N. Cahn Federal Building and United States

8 Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 751 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

3 States to the Federal building and United States court4 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Edward N. Cahn Federal Building and

6 United States Courthouse’’.

Æ
| SubsidiaryName                    | Jurisdictionsin which Incorporated | Percentageof Ownership |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------|------------------------|
| GillaOperations, LLC              | USA(Florida)                       | 100%                   |
| E VaporLabs Inc.                  | USA(Florida)                       | 100%                   |
| GillaEnterprises Inc.             | Canada(Ontario)                    | 100%                   |
| GillaOperations Europe s.r.o.(1)  | SlovakRepublic (Nove Zamky)        | 100%                   |
| GillaEurope Kft.(2)               | Hungary(Budapest)                  | 100%                   |
| VapeBrands International Inc. (3) | Canada(Canada)                     | 100%                   |
| HyStyleBrands Inc.                | Canada(Ontario)                    | 100%                   |
| E-LiqWorld, LLC                   | USA(California)                    | 100%                   |
| GillaFranchises, LLC              | USA(Florida)                       | 100%                   |
| Legionof Vape, LLC(4)             | USA(Florida)                       | 100%                   |
| GillaOperations Worldwide Limited | Ireland(Dublin)                    | 100%                   |
| Charlie’sClub, Inc.        | USA(Florida)                       | 100%                   |
| SnokeDistribution Canada Ltd.     | Canada(Ontario)                    | 100%                   |
| SnokeDistribution USA, LLC(5)     | USA(Florida)                       | 100%                   |
Exhibit	8

Case 1:22-mc-23619-RKA Document 5-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 1 of 2
14/10/2022, 10:00 Home

https://online.ciregistry.gov.ky/cos/faces/home?_adf.no-new-window-redirect=true 1/1

Director Details

Director Name

Back to Entity Search

Entity Name: H.I.G. EUROPE - MAILLIS LTD.

Anthony A. Tamer

Sami Mnaymneh

Terms & Conditions

General Registry | Ground Floor, Government Admin Building, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islan

Case 1:22-mc-23619-RKA Document 5-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 2 of 2