alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5626

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide additional authority to the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to order refunds of unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory or preferential rates and charges for

electricity, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 3, 2000

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide additional authority to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

to order refunds of unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory or preferential rates and charges for electricity, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL REFUND AUTHORITY UNDER FED4 ERAL POWER ACT.

5 Section 206 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

6 824e) is amended by adding the following at the end there7 of:
2

•HR 5626 IH

1 ‘‘(e)(1) The provisions of this subsection shall apply

2 only to refunds of rates and charges in effect pursuant

3 to a rule or order of the Commission providing for market4 based rates and charges for a transmission or sale of elec5 tric energy subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission.

6 The provisions of subsection (b) concerning refunds shall

7 not apply to such rates and charges.

8 ‘‘(2) When the Commission has found, after notice

9 and opportunity for a hearing, on its own motion or upon

10 complaint, that any rate or charge referred to in para11 graph (1) is unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory

12 or preferential, the Commission may order a refund of the

13 portion of such rate or charge that exceeds the rate or

14 charge that the Commission finds to be just, reasonable

15 and not unduly discriminatory or preferential. Such re16 fund shall include interest from the date on which the rate

17 or charge was paid.

18 ‘‘(3) No order providing for a refund under this sub19 section may be issued with respect to amounts paid prior

20 to the date 2 years before the date on which the notice

21 referred to in paragraph (2) is published in the Federal

22 Register.’’.

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

24 subsection (a) shall not apply to any complaint filed before

25 August 1, 2000.
3

•HR 5626 IH

1 (c) SAVINGS PROVISIONS.—Nothing in the amend2 ment made by subsection (a) shall affect any authority

3 of the Commission (or of any court) existing before the

4 enactment of this section, including any such authority to

5 issue any rule or order relating to market-based rates, to

6 approve or fix rates and charges, or to order refunds of

7 any rate or charge.

Æ
JUDGES PRESENT. *Field, Lomax, Estill, Brown, Smith, Fry, Clopton, Baker, Douglass, Wilson, Gholson,*M’ *Comas, Scarburg.*

#### The Commonwealth v. Smith & Burwell.

June, 1844.

Indictments—Sale of Liquor to Slaves—Allegations.*— In an indictment for selling ardent spirits to slaves, it is not necessary to state the names ol the owners of the slaves to whom the liquor was sold.

This was an indictment against Smith & Burwell, as partners, in the superior court of Jefferson, for selling spirits “to slaves, whose names or whose owners’ names *were to the jurors unknown,” without the consent in writing of the masters or mistresses &c. of such slaves. The defendants demurred to the indictment, and stated for cause of demurrer, that the indictment did, not state the names of the slaves, or of the owners of the slaves, to whom the liquor was sold. And the court, with the consent of the defendant, adjourned to the general court the following question:

‘ ‘Is it necessary in the indictment for the offence aforesaid, to set forth the names of the owners of such slaves?”

*

Indictments—Selling Liquor without License—Name of Purchaser.—It is not necessary in indictments for retailing ardent spirits without license to aver, the name of the person to whom the liquor is sold. State v. Pendergast, 20 W. Va. 672; Hulstead's Case, 5 Leigh 724; Dove’s Case, 2 Va. Cas. 26; State v. Chisnell, 36 W. Va. 659. 15 S. E. Rep. 412. See also, mono-graphic *note*on “Intoxicating Liquors” appended to Thon v. Com., 31 Gratt. 887, and monographic *note*on “Indictments, Informations and Presentments” appended to Boyle v. Com., 14 Gratt. 674; and *foot-note*to Com. v. Dove, 2 Va. Cas. 26.

The principal case is cited in this connection in Morganstern v. Com., 27 Gratt. 1022,.and State v. Chisnell, 36 W. Va. 659, 15 S. E. Rep. 412.

SMITH, J.,

delivered the resolution of the court.

The court is of opinion, and doth decide, that it was not necessary, in the indictment in this case, to set forth the names of the owners of the slaves mentioned in said indictment—which is ordered to be certified &c.
295P15

#### State v. Claude Edward Dammons

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR (COAP15-499)

1. Denied 11/19/2015

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed 11/19/2015
#### § 109-30.001-50 Applicability.

The provisions of 41 CFR part 101-30 do not apply to designated contractors.
§ 964.15 Decisions. ( a ) *Initial decision by Administrative Law Judge.* A written initial decision shall be rendered by an Administrative Law Judge with all due speed. The initial decision shall include findings and conclusions with the reasons therefor upon all the material issues of fact or law presented in the record, and the appropriate orders or denial thereof. The initial decision shall become the final agency decision unless an appeal is taken in accordance with § 964.16.
( b ) *Tentative or final decision by the Judicial Officer.* When the Judicial Officer presides at the hearing he shall issue a final or a tentative decision. Such decision shall include findings and conclusions with the reasons therefor upon all the material issues of fact or law presented in the record, and the appropriate orders or denial thereof. The tentative decision shall become the final agency decision unless exceptions are filed in accordance with § 964.16.
No. 11-496.

#### Harmon et ux. *v.*Kimmel et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 736 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 736

          To repeal the Davis-Bacon Act and the Copeland Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1999

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To repeal the Davis-Bacon Act and the Copeland Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DAVIS-BACON ACT.

    (a) Repeal.--The Act of March 3, 1931 (40 U.S.C. 276a et seq.) 
(commonly referred to as the Davis-Bacon Act) is repealed.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law to a wage requirement of 
the Act of March 3, 1931, shall after the date of the enactment of this 
Act be null and void.

SEC. 2. COPELAND ACT.

    Section 2 of the Act of June 13, 1934 (40 U.S.C. 276c) (commonly 
referred to as the ``Copeland Act'') is repealed.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by sections 1 and 2 shall take effect 30 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act but shall not affect any 
contract in existence on such date of enactment or made pursuant to 
invitation for bids outstanding on such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Peter Stepanek) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Peter Stepanek.

Dated this 28

th day of April 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 139 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/28/2023 Page 1 of 1
# Comments on: 18-2251: UNILOC  2017 LLC v FACEBOOK INC. [ORDER], Nonprecedential
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 2140 Lower Tribunal No. 2017

- CF

- 001435

_____________________________
E RRICK H OLME S , J R

. , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Ap pellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from Osceola County. Keith A. Carsten, Judge.

June 4, 202 4

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

. NARDELLA and WOZNIAK, JJ., and LAMBERT, B.D., Associate Judge
, c oncur.

Errick Holmes , Jr., Punta Gorda, pro se

. No Appearance for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
1 

### Hutson, Nick

From: Hutson, Nick Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 8:48 PM To: Frey, Nathan J. Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Fruh, Steve; 'Szabo, Aaron' Subject: Updated version of 111(b) New/Mod/Recon preamble an d Reg Text Attachments: 111b preamble_DRAFT_072415_RLSO_compareto_071015.do cx; 111b preamble_DRAFT_ 072415_clean.docx; GHG_EGU_111(b)_Reg_Text_072415.d ocx

Nathan,

Please find 3 attached files related to EO12866 rev iew for 111(b) GHG standards for new, modified, and reconstructed EGUs

1. A clean version of the DRAFT final preamble with re sponses to OMB/Interagency comments in marginal comment balloons. 2. A redline strikeout (RLSO) showing changes in this 07/24/15 version as compared to the previous versio n that was submitted on 07/10/15 3. A version of the 111(b) regulatory text showing cha nges.

We expect some more minor changes to be made over t he weekend as we continue to proofread and fill in a few gaps. I will provide you with updated versions to reflect t hose incremental changes - likely early Monday.

Have a nice weekend, Nick 

# Nick Hutson, PhD

Energy Strategies Group Office of Air & Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 tel: +1 919 541 2968 email: hutson.nick@epa.gov

From: Hutson, Nick Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 5:50 PM To: 'Szabo, Aaron'; Frey, Nathan J. Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Fruh, Steve Subject: RE: Updated version of 111(b) New/Mod/Recon preamb le and Reg Text

Nathan, Aaron –

The attached is our responses to Interagency Commen ts. You’ll see that the majority of comments have been responded to.

There are still a few that we are still considering and we will provide updates to those few comments as soon as we can.

Have a nice weekend.2 Nick



# Nick Hutson, PhD

Energy Strategies Group Office of Air & Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 tel: +1 919 541 2968 email: hutson.nick@epa.gov

From: Hutson, Nick Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 5:08 PM To: Szabo, Aaron; Frey, Nathan J. Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Fruh, Steve Subject: Updated version of 111(b) New/Mod/Recon preamble a nd Reg Text

Nathan and Aaron,

Please find attached 3 files:

1. A clean version of the DRAFT final 111(b) standards for new, modified, and reconstructed fossil fuel-f ired EGUs 2. A RLSO version that shows changes to the version th at was previously submitted (note: formatting chang es are not shown) 3. A clean version of the accompanying rule language

Our response to comments from the initial OMB/Inter agency review will follow.

Thanks, Nick



# Nick Hutson, PhD

Energy Strategies Group Office of Air & Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 tel: +1 919 541 2968 email: hutson.nick@epa.gov
Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-6.213-7 Post termination proceedings. ( a ) An applicant or recipient adversely affected by an order issued under § 101-6.213-6 shall be restored to full eligibility to receive Federal financial assistance if it satisfies the terms and conditions of that order for such eligibility or if it brings itself into compliance with this subpart and provides reasonable assurance that it will fully comply with this subpart. An elementary or secondary school or school system which is unable to file an assurance of compliance with § 101-6.24 shall be restored to full eligibility to receive financial assistance if it files a court order or a plan for desegregation meeting the requirements of § 101-6.205-3 and provides reasonable assurance that it will comply with this court order or plan.
( b ) Any applicant or recipient adversely affected by an order entered pursuant to § 101-6.213-6 may at any time request the responsible GSA official to restore fully its eligibility to receive Federal financial assistance. Any such request shall be supported by information showing that the applicant or recipient has met the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section. If the responsible GSA official determines that those requirements have been satisfied, he shall restore such eligibility.
( c ) If the responsible GSA official denies any such request, the applicant or recipient may submit a request, in writing, for a hearing, specifying why it believes such official to have been in error. It shall thereupon be given an expeditious hearing, with a decision on the record, in accordance with rules of procedure issued by the responsible GSA official. The applicant or recipient will be restored to such eligibility if it proves at such a hearing that it satisfied the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section. While proceedings under this section are pending, the sanctions imposed by the order issued under § 101-6.213-6 shall remain in effect.
[38 FR 17975, July 5, 1973]
# Comments on: 20-1083: STEUBEN FOODS, INC. v. VIDAL [OPINION], Nonprecedential
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 122 (Friday, June 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting: Announcing an Open Meeting of the Board

TIME AND DATE: 2 P.M., Thursday, June 29, 2000.

PLACE: Board Room, Second Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board 1777 F 
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006.

STATUS: The entire meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED DURING PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:   
    <bullet> Final Rule: Federal Home Loan Bank Acquired Member Assets, 
Core Mission Activities, Investments and Advances.
    <bullet> Final Rule: Amendments to Advances and Other Regulations 
to Implement Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Collateral Provisions and Make 
Related Revisions.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the 
Board, (202) 408-2837.

William W. Ginsberg,
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 00-16010 Filed 6-20-00; 4:59 pm]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit Corporation
(the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David
L. Yowan, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |                          | 
|------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|/s/ David L.
 Yowan
|                    |                         
|Name:               | David L.
 Yowan          | 
|Title:              | Chief
 Executive Officer
|Date:               | May 10, 2011             | 

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except
to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated
by reference in any such filing.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

E-6

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Experimental & Integrative Activities (1193).                    

*Date and Time:*                         June 29, 2000, 8 a.m.-5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Room 130, National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Anthony Maddox, CISE Educational Innovation, Experimental and Integrative Activities, Room 1160, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, VA 22230 Telephone: (703) 306-1981.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate CISE Educational Innovation proposals submitted in response to the program announcement (NSF 00-33).                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: June 19, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-15833 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
**Exhibit 10.29** **CONSOLIDATED    EBITDA**     Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,    non-cash stock compensation and payments, non-cash charges that    do not result in future cash obligations, any extraordinary or    non recurring gains (losses) and any non-cash transactions    (Consolidated EBITDA) is not intended to present a measure of    performance in accordance with accounting principles generally    accepted in the United States (GAAP). Nor should Consolidated    EBITDA be considered as an alternative to statements of cash    flows as a measure of liquidity. Consolidated EBITDA is included    herein as means to measure operating performance that financial    analysts, lenders, investors and other interested parties find    to be a useful tool for analyzing companies.     The definition of Consolidated EBITDA is defined in the senior    secured convertible notes as a measurement for meeting the notes    covenant requirements. For the three months ended    September 30, 2007, the Consolidated EBITDA was required to    be no less than a negative $3,500 in order for the Company to be    compliant with covenant requirements of the notes. The Company    was in compliance with the required covenant at    September 30, 2007.     The following table reconciles our consolidated net earnings per    GAAP to Consolidated EBITDA:        **Three Months**