alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Biological Products Regulated Under Section 351 of the Public Health Service Act; Implementation of Biologics License; Elimination of Establishment License and Product License” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                     In the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 20, 1999 (64 FR 56441), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0427. The approval expires on December 31, 2002. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                 

Dated: January 14, 2000. 

William K. Hubbard, 

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation. 

[FR Doc. 00-1537 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
No. 10-11108.

#### Sanders *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
§ 109-1.5106 Segregation of personal property. Generally, contractor-owned personal property shall be segregated from Government personal property. Commingling of Government and contractor-owned personal property may be allowed only when: ( a ) The segregation of the property would materially hinder the progress of the work (*i.e.,* segregation is not feasible for reasons such as small quantities, lack of space, or increased costs); and
( b ) Control procedures are adequate (*i.e.,* the Government property is specifically marked or otherwise identified as Government property).
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 598

To require the Federal Communications Commission to eliminate from its

regulations the restrictions on the cross-ownership of broadcasting stations and newspapers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. OXLEY (for himself, Mr. STEARNS, and Mr. HALL of Texas) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To require the Federal Communications Commission to eliminate from its regulations the restrictions on the crossownership of broadcasting stations and newspapers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CROSS-OWNERSHIP OF BROADCASTING AND

4 NEWSPAPERS.

5 (a) RULE CHANGES REQUIRED.—The Federal Com6 munications Commission shall modify section 73.3555 of

7 its regulations (47 C.F.R. 73.3555) by eliminating any

8 provisions limiting the granting or renewal of an AM, FM,

9 or TV broadcast station license to any party (including
2

•HR 598 IH

1 parties under common control) on the basis of the owner2 ship, operation, or control by such party of a daily news3 paper.

4 (b) DEADLINE FOR ACTIONS.—The Federal Commu5 nications Commission shall complete all actions necessary

6 to complete the modifications required by subsection (a)

7 within 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
V

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5598

For the relief of Barbara Makuch.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 27, 2000

Mr. REYNOLDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Barbara Makuch.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

4 In consideration of the fact that Barbara Makuch—

5 (1) served 22 years as a foreign counterintel6 ligence agent and dedicated her life to assist the

7 Federal Bureau of Investigation in its efforts at the

8 height of the Cold War to combat communism, the

9 Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti (KGB), and

10 the Soviet Union;

11 (2) was presented the Louis E. Peters Memo12 rial Service Award, the highest civilian award pre-
2

•HR 5598 IH

1 sented by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, for

2 her valorous service; and

3 (3) has not received employment assistance or

4 health, social security, or pension benefits, despite

5 assurances that she would receive such benefits upon

6 her retirement,

7 the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of funds not

8 otherwise appropriated, the sum of $1,000,000 to Barbara

9 Makuch of East Amherst, New York, in compensation for

10 the lifetime aggregate value of benefits earned but not re11 ceived by Barbara Makuch.

12 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM.

13 The sum paid under section 1 shall be in full satisfac14 tion of any claims that Barbara Makuch may have against

15 the United States arising out of her service for the Federal

16 Bureau of Investigation.

17 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES.

18 Not more than 10 percent of the sum paid under sec19 tion 1 shall be paid to or received by any agent or attorney

20 for services rendered in connection with the recovery of

21 such sum. Any person who violates this section shall be

22 fined under title 18, United States Code.

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInvestigation to advance prediction techniques of the low-speed aerodynamics of V/STOL aircraftA computer program, VSAERO, has been applied to a number of V/STOL configurations with a view to advancing prediction techniques for the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics. The program couples a low-order panel method with surface streamline calculation and integral boundary layer procedures. The panel method--which uses piecewise constant source and doublet panels-includes an iterative procedure for wake shape and models boundary layer displacement effect using the source transpiration technique. Certain improvements to a basic vortex tube jet model were installed in the code prior to evaluation. Very promising results were obtained for surface pressures near a jet issuing at 90 deg from a flat plate. A solid core model was used in the initial part of the jet with a simple entrainment model. Preliminary representation of the downstream separation zone significantly improve the correlation. The program accurately predicted the pressure distribution inside the inlet on the Grumman 698-411 design at a range of flight conditions. Furthermore, coupled viscous/potential flow calculations gave very close correlation with experimentally determined operational boundaries dictated by the onset of separation inside the inlet. Experimentally observed degradation of these operational boundaries between nacelle-alone tests and tests on the full configuration were also indicated by the calculation. Application of the program to the General Dynamics STOL fighter design were equally encouraging. Very close agreement was observed between experiment and calculation for the effects of power on pressure distribution, lift and lift curve slope.Document ID19860014097Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMaskew, B.*(Analytical Methods, Inc. Redmond, WA, United States)*Strash, D.*(Analytical Methods, Inc. Redmond, WA, United States)*Nathman, J.*(Analytical Methods, Inc. Redmond, WA, United States)*Dvorak, F. A.*(Analytical Methods, Inc. Redmond, WA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1985Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-166479NAS 1.26:166479Accession Number86N23568Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS2-11169Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860014097.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 302-12.1 Who determines if I may use a RSC?

Your agency determines whether you may use a RSC and chooses which RSC you may use.

[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18343, Apr. 1, 2011]
Brenda Edwards-Jones To:

cc: 07/26/2006 07:04 PM Subject: Brenda Edwards-Jones/EE/DOE@DOE Ronald Lewis/EE/DOE@DOE, Jim Raba/EE/DOE@DOE, Charles Llenza/EE/DOE@DOE DRAFT E-Mail to Stakeholders re: En Masse Test Procedures NOPR 0 Federal Record Not a Federal Record

User Filed as: Not Categorized in ERMS

Ladies and Gentlemen,

This e-mail is to inform you that the U.S. Department of Energy has published on July 25, 2006, in the Federal Register a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Public Meeting concerning test procedures, and certification, compliance and enforcement requirements for consumer products and certain commercial and industrial equipment. These include:

Ceiling fans • Ceiling fan light kits • Dehumidifiers • Medium base compact fluorescent lamps Battery chargers • External power supplies Torchieres Unit heaters Automatic commercial ice makers Commercial prerinse spray valves Illuminated exit signs Traffic signal modules and pedestrian modules • Refrigerated bottled or canned beverage vending machines • Commercial package air conditioning and heating equipment rated at or above 240,000 and below 750,000 BTU/hour cooling capacity Commercial refrigerators, freezers, and refrigerator-freezers with a self-contained condensing unit designed for holding temperature applications, and commercial refrigerators with a self-contained condensing unit designed for pull-down temperature applications and with transparent doors • Ice-cream freezers; commercial refrigerators, freezers, and refrigerator-freezers with a self-contained condensing unit without doors; and commercial refrigerators, freezers, and refrigerator-freezers with a remote condensing unit

Furthermore, the Department is announcing technical corrections to the October 18, 2005, Final Rule, 70 FR 60407, which the Department has described in detail in today's notice and will add to the rule language.

A copy of the Federal Register notice is attached.

The public meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, on Tuesday, September 26, 2006. The Department will accept comments, data, and information regarding the proposed rule no later than October 10, 2006.

For further information, please see http://www.eere.energygov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/commercial_equipment_t est_procedures•html.If you have any questions or comments, please submit them to:

testprocedu res_EPACT2OO5@eeUdoe.gov.

Sincerely,

James Raba Project Manager Building Technologies Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

71 FR 421 78Ju 25 2006.pdl
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 2 2 1 3

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T u e s d a y

, A u g u s t 0 4

, 2 0 1 5 9 : 0 1 A M

T o : M E O L S E N @ Y

A H O O

. C O M

D e a r M r

. O l s e n :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

− 2 0 1 5

− 2 2 1 3 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 8 / 1 8 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 4 2 6 4

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4007

_____________________________

ISSAC J. TILLMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela M. Cox, Judge.

April 22, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that the appeal is untimely. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Any request for belated 

appeal must be filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.141(c).

RAY, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Issac J. Tillman, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–532

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF S. 1287, NUCLEAR

WASTE POLICY AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2000

MARCH 21, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 444]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 444, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of S. 1287, Nuclear

Waste Policy Amendments Act of 2000, under a closed rule. The

rule provides one hour of debate in the House divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Commerce.

Finally, the rule provides one motion to commit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>





                  PRIDE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                          ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATIONS S-X



The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  financial  statements  for the year ended November 30, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<CAPTION>

<S>                                                    <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           nov-30-1997
<CASH>                                                 250,699
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          2,022,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            1,022,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                                 24,570,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                         3,898,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         33,689,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               2,653
<OTHER-SE>                                             11,954,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           33,689,582
<SALES>                                                12,884,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       12,884,018
<CGS>                                                  10,241,850
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          10,241,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     860,242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (600,622)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (600,622)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (600,622)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.25)
        


</TABLE>
372P15

#### William Shannon, M.D. v. Bob Testen, Joseph P. Jordan, and North Carolina Physicians Health Program, Inc.

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-64)

Denied
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3044127-OCT-201109:24 AM
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

             [LETTERHEAD OF ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, LLP APPEARS HERE]




                       INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
13975) on Form S-8 of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated August 7, 1998,
relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Patapsco 
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of June 30, 1998, and the related consolidated 
statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then 
ended, which report appears in the June 30, 1998 Annual Report of Form 10-KSB of
Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.


                                                 /s/ Anderson Associates LLP
                                                 Anderson Associates, LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
September 25, 1998
#### § 102-117.330 When, or under what circumstances, would GSA delegate authority to an agency to appear on its own behalf before a transportation regulatory body proceeding?

GSA will delegate authority when it does not have the expertise, or when it is outside of GSA's purview, to make a determination on an issue such as a protest of rates, routings or excessive charges.
§ 102-34.130 How do we display U.S. Government license plates on Government motor vehicles? ( a ) Display official U.S. Government license plates on the front and rear of all Government motor vehicles. The exception is two-wheeled motor vehicles and trailers, which require rear license plates only.
( b ) You must display U.S. Government license plates on the Government motor vehicle to which the license plates were assigned.
( c ) Display the U.S. Government license plates until the Government motor vehicle is removed from Government service or is transferred outside the agency, or until the plates are damaged and require replacement. U.S. Government license plates shall only be used for one Government motor vehicle and shall not be reissued to another Government motor vehicle.
( d ) For motor vehicles owned or commercially leased by DOD, also follow DOD regulations.
#### § 109-38.5203 Watercraft identification and numbers.

Watercraft in the custody of DOE or designated contractors shall display identifying numbers, whether issued by the U.S. Coast Guard, State, or local field organization, in accordance with applicable requirements.
Exhibit 32.2
                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

         Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as created  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned  officer of Tanger GP Trust,  sole
general   partner  of  Tanger   Properties   Limited   Partnership   ("Operating
Partnership") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i)  the  accompanying  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of the  Operating
     Partnership  for the year ended  December  31,  2003 (the  "Report")  fully
     complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or Section  15(d),  as
     applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Operating Partnership.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Dated:   March 11, 2004                  /s/Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
       --------------------              --------------------------------------
                                         Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
                                         Treasurer & Assistant Secretary
                                         Tanger GP Trust,
                                         Sole General Partner of the Registrant