alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

RICCARDO SILVA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MOBILE BILLBOARDS, INC., et al.

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:22-cv-24262-ALTMAN/Reid

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Riccardo Silva (“Plaintiff”), pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure, voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action with prejudice without costs 

to any parties. 

Dated: November 13, 2023. Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Benjamin Greenberg

GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A.

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 4400

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: (305) 579-0570

Facsimile: (305) 961-5702

THOMAS R. HEISLER

Florida Bar No. 1029852

heislert@gtlaw.com

BENJAMIN GREENBERG

Florida Bar No. 192732

greenbergb@gtlaw.com

A. SHEILA ORETSKY

Florida Bar No. 31365

sheila.oretsky@gtlaw.com

JOSHUA M. MANDEL

Florida Bar No. 1031396

mandelj@gtlaw.comMoti

FLService@gtlaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiff Riccardo Silva

Case 1:22-cv-24262-RKA Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/13/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 13th day of November, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF.

/s/ Benjamin Greenberg 

BENJAMIN GREENBERG

Case 1:22-cv-24262-RKA Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/13/2023 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
21.1








List of
Subsidiaries





Tanger
Development Corporation





TWMB
Associates, LLC





Tanger
Deer Park, LLC





Deer Park
Enterprise, LLC





DPE Mezz,
LLC





Deer Park
Warehouse, LLC





Tanger
COROC, LLC





Tanger
COROC II, LLC





COROC
Holdings, LLC





COROC/Riviera
L.L.C.





COROC/Hilton
Head I L.L.C.





COROC/Hilton
Head II L.L.C.





COROC/Lincoln
City L.L.C.





COROC/Myrtle
Beach L.L.C.





COROC/Park
City L.L.C.





COROC/Rehoboth
I L.L.C.





COROC/Rehoboth
II L.L.C.





COROC/Rehoboth
III L.L.C.





COROC/Lakes
Region L.L.C.





COROC/Tilton
II L.L.C.





COROC/Tuscola
L.L.C.





COROC/Westbrook
I L.L.C.





COROC/Westbrook
II L.L.C.





COROC/Clinton
CHR, LLC





COROC/Clinton
WR, LLC





Tanger
Devco, LLC





Tanger
WD, LLC





Tanger
Wisconsin Dells, LLC





Northline
Indemnity, LLC





Tanger
Piedmont, LLC





Tanger
PSL, LLC





Tanger
Piedmont, LLC





Tanger
Phoenix, LLC
No. 11-9439.

#### Allen *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### § 105-50.202 Specific services.

Within the functional areas identified in § 105-50.201, GSA can provide the services hereinafter described.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        C.E.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(B) AND 15D-14(B)


     In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q for the period ending March 3, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to  Exchange  Act Rules 13a-14(b) and
15d-14(b)  and  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350  (as  adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002)  that  he  is  the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company  and  that:  (1)  the  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the  periods  covered  in  the  Report.

/s/ Michael A. Richardson
-----------------------------------
Michael A. Richardson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  April 16, 2007
No. 11-9192.

#### Fidalgo *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
SCWC-14-0000856

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

NICHOLAS R. PAO, JR., Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

RICHARD C. DEWAELE, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0000856; CIV. NO. 04-1-1339)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Nicholas R. Pao, Jr.’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on May 22, 2015, is

hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 7, 2015.

Nicholas R. Pao, Jr.,

petitioner pro se

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-14-0000856

07-JUL-2015

09:32 AM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISON

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-24150-SCOLA/GOODMAN

MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS SERIES 44, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO

JOIN PARTIES AND TO FILE MOTIONS TO AMEND THE PLEADINGS

Plaintiff MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC (“MSP Recovery”) asks this Court 

to extend the deadline “to join parties and to file motions to amend the pleadings” to 

August 2, 2023, which is 30 days before the deadline to complete fact discovery. [ECF No. 

11]. Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) filed 

a response, stating that it does not oppose MSP Recovery’s request for an enlargement of 

time, but asks that the Court extend the deadline to only June 5, 2023, which is 90 days 

before the deadline to complete fact discovery. [ECF No. 19]. United States District Court 

Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. referred to the Undersigned the motion “to be heard and 

determined, consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, 

and Rule 1(c) of the Local Magistrate Judge Rules.” [ECF No. 12].

Plaintiff filed this action in Florida state court on November 17, 2022. [ECF No. 1-

Case 1:22-cv-24150-RNS Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/16/2023 Page 1 of 3
2

2]. Defendant removed the case to federal court on December 21, 2022. [ECF No. 1]. In 

support of its request for a five-month extension of the deadline to amend pleadings and 

add parties, Plaintiff states in a conclusory fashion that this extension “would give the 

parties adequate time to determine on a full record other parties that may need to be 

joined and the facts that they intend to prove at trial.” [ECF No. 11]. Plaintiff has provided 

no facts which are unique to this case which would justify such a lengthy extension of 

time. Awodiya v. Ross Univ. Sch. of Med., No. 18-60482-CIV, 2021 WL 9928510, at *1 (S.D. 

Fla. Oct. 28, 2021) (“Under Rule 16, a scheduling order ‘may be modified only for good 

cause and with the judge's consent.’” (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) (emphasis added)).

Plaintiff’s threadbare assertions -- which could be applied to any case -- hardly 

establish that good cause exists for such a lengthy extension of time. Further, as 

Defendant notes in its response, such a protracted extension could hamper a new party’s 

ability to engage in discovery and would likely result in an extension of the trial date. 

Nonetheless, because Defendant does not object to an extension to June 5, 2023, the 

Undersigned grants in part Plaintiff’s motion and extends the deadline for the parties to 

amend their pleadings or to join parties to June 5, 2023.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, in Miami, Florida, on March 16, 2023. 

Case 1:22-cv-24150-RNS Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/16/2023 Page 2 of 3
3

Copies furnished to:

The Honorable Robert N. Scola, Jr.

All counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-24150-RNS Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/16/2023 Page 3 of 3
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00170

- CV

Artie Duhart v. Jose Luis Montejano Inc.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022

- CCV

- 60251

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having cons idered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 30, 2022
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 757 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 757

 To prohibit the construction of new facilities and structures within 
  the boundaries of the George Washington Memorial Parkway along the 
Potomac River in Virginia between the Francis Scott Key Bridge and the 
                  Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Bridge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1999

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the construction of new facilities and structures within 
  the boundaries of the George Washington Memorial Parkway along the 
Potomac River in Virginia between the Francis Scott Key Bridge and the 
                  Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Bridge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the shoreline along the Potomac River in the State of 
        Virginia between the Francis Scott Key Bridge and the Theodore 
        Roosevelt Memorial Bridge within the boundaries of the George 
        Washington Memorial Parkway is pristine and currently 
        undeveloped;
            (2) the viewshed and other resources enjoyed by the public 
        who visit Theodore Roosevelt Island and surrounding environs 
        would be negatively impacted by development along this 
        shoreline; and
            (3) in order to protect the park resources along this 
        shoreline, construction of new facilities and structures must 
        be prohibited.

SEC. 2. DEVELOPMENT PROHIBITION.

    (a) Prohibition.--No facility or structure may be constructed after 
the enactment of this Act within the boundaries of the George 
Washington Memorial Parkway between the Francis Scott Key Bridge and 
the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Bridge along the Potomac River in the 
State of Virginia. Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
prohibit the repair or reconstruction of any part of the George 
Washington Memorial Parkway.
    (b) Map.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
Director of the National Park Service, shall prepare a map showing the 
specific boundaries of the prohibition per subsection (a) of this 
section. Such map shall be on file and available for public inspection 
in the office of the Director of the National Park Service.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Richard W. Lucas, as Chief Financial Officer of KSW, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Amendment No. 1 of the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 29, 2004

                                                  /s/ Richard W. Lucas
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Richard W. Lucas
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.6

 


	
Number
   A-
    	
 
    	
Incorporated Under the   Laws of the State of Delaware
    	
 
    	
Shares
   -0-
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Cusip No.
    




 

LIBERTY MEDIA CORPORATION

 

Series A Liberty Formula One Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

 

Specimen Certificate

 

This Certifies that [          ]  is the owner of [          ] FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF SERIES A LIBERTY FORMULA ONE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE, OF LIBERTY MEDIA CORPORATION (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

 

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.

 

Dated:

 

Liberty Media Corporation

 

[Corporate Seal]

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
President
    	
 
    	
Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Natural Resources Conservation Service 

# AGENCY:

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of proposed changes in section IV of the FOTG of the NRCS in Indiana for review and comment. 

# SUMMARY:

It is the intention of NRCS in Indiana to issue two revised conservation practice standards in section IV of the FOTG. The revised standards are Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (Code 645) and Irrigation Water Management (Code 449). These practices may be used in conservation systems that treat highly erodible land. 

# DATES:

Comments will be received on or before July 21, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Address all requests and comments to Jane E. Hardisty, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 6013 Lakeside Blvd., Indianapolis, Indiana 46278. Copies of these standards will be made available upon written or electronic request. You may submit electronic requests and comments to joe.gasperi@in.usda.gov. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jane E. Hardisty, 317-290-3200. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after enactment of the law, to NRCS state technical guides used to carry out highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law, shall be made available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS in Indiana will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in Indiana regarding disposition of those comments and a final determination of changes will be made. 

Dated: June 12, 2000. 

Jane E. Hardisty, 

State Conservationist, Indianapolis, Indiana. 

[FR Doc. 00-15667 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-16-U
#### § 102-36.360 How do we dispose of aircraft parts that are life-limited but have no FSCAP designation?

When disposing of life-limited aircraft parts that have no FSCAP designation, you must ensure that tags and labels, historical data, and maintenance records accompany the part on any transfers, donations or sales. For additional information regarding the disposal of life-limited parts with or without tags or documentation, refer to part 102-33 of this chapter.

[65 FR 31218, May 16, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 53572, Sept. 12, 2006]
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley D. Tilden,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except that, for
               the reasons described in the Report, the Company's new
               independent public accountants have not completed their review of
               the unaudited financial statements included in the Report as
               required by Rule 10-01(d) of Regulation S-X; and

        (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company


/s/ Bradley D. Tilden


Bradley D. Tilden
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
§ 105-70.021 Discovery. ( a ) The following types of discovery are authorized: ( 1 ) Requests for production of documents for inspection and copying;
( 2 ) Requests for admissions of the authenticity of any relevant document or of the truth of any relevant fact;
( 3 ) Written interrogatories; and
( 4 ) Depositions.
( b ) For the purpose of this section and §§ 105-70.022 and 105-70.023, the term “documents” includes information, documents, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence. Nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to require the creation of a document.
( c ) Unless mutually agreed to by the parties, discovery is available only as ordered by the ALJ. The ALJ shall regulate the timing of discovery.
( d ) *Motions for discovery.* ( 1 ) A party seeking discovery may file a motion with the ALJ. Such a motion shall be accompanied by a copy of the requested discovery, or in the case of depositions, a summary of the scope of the proposed deposition.
( 2 ) Within ten days of service, a party may file an opposition to the motion and/or a motion for protective order as provided in § 105-70.024.
( 3 ) The ALJ may grant a motion for discovery only if he finds that the discovery sought— ( i ) Is necessary for the expeditious, fair, and reasonable consideration of the issues;
( ii ) Is not unduly costly or burdensome;
( iii ) Will not unduly delay the proceeding; and
( iv ) Does not seek privileged information.
( 4 ) The burden of showing that discovery should be allowed is on the party seeking discovery;
( 5 ) The ALJ may grant discovery subject to a protective order under § 105-70.024.
( e ) *Depositions.* ( 1 ) If a motion for deposition is granted, the ALJ shall issue a subpoena for the deponent, which may require the deponent to produce documents. The subpoena shall specify the time and place at which the deposition will be held.
( 2 ) The party seeking to depose shall serve the subpoena in the manner prescribed in § 105-70.008.
( 3 ) The deponent may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion for a protective order within ten days of service.
( 4 ) The party seeking to depose shall provide for the taking of a verbatim transcript of the deposition, which it shall make available to all other parties for inspection and copying.
( f ) Each party shall bear its own costs of discovery.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 748 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 748

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Act that established the Keweenaw National Historical Park 
   to require the Secretary of the Interior to consider nominees of 
various local interests in appointing members of the Keweenaw National 
                  Historical Park Advisory Commission.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 748

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Act that established the Keweenaw National Historical Park 
   to require the Secretary of the Interior to consider nominees of 
various local interests in appointing members of the Keweenaw National 
                  Historical Park Advisory Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPOINTMENTS TO KEWEENAW NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ADVISORY 
              COMMISSION.

    Section 9(c)(1) of the Act entitled ``An Act to establish the 
Keweenaw National Historical Park, and for other purposes'' (Public Law 
102-543; 16 U.S.C. 410yy-8(c)(1)) is amended by striking ``from 
nominees'' each place it appears and inserting ``after consideration of 
nominees''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 102-72.35 What are the requirements for obtaining an Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) delegation from GSA? When Federal agencies do not exercise the delegation of authority for general purpose space mentioned in § 102-72.30(b) of this part, GSA may consider granting an ACO delegation when Federal agencies— ( a ) Occupy at least 90 percent of the building's GSA-controlled space, or Federal agencies have the written concurrence of 100 percent of rent-paying occupants covered under the lease; and
( b ) Have the technical capability to perform the leasing function.
#### § 105-74.615 Conviction.

*Conviction* means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes.