39348 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 123 / Monday, June 26, 2000 / Notices

1The Act expired on August 20, 1994. Executive

Order 12924 (3 CFR 1994 Comp. 917 (1995)),

extended by Presidential Notices of August 15, 1995

(3 CFR 1995 Comp. 501 (1996)), August 14, 1996

(3 CFR 1996 Comp. 298 (1997)), August 13, 1997

(3 CFR 1997 Comp. 306 (1998)), August 13, 1998

(3 CFR 1998 Comp. 294 (1999)) and August 10,

1999 (3 CFR 1999 Comp. 302 (2000)), continued the

Export Administration Regulations in effect under

the International Emergency Economic Powers Act

(50 U.S.C.A 1701–1706 (1991 & Supp. 2000)).

2Pursuant to appropriate delegations of authority

that are reflected in the Regulations, the Director,

Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the

Director, Office of Export Enforcement, exercises

the authority granted to the Secretary by Section

11(h) of the Act.

GRAIN

[In bushels]

Licensed

capacity

Annual

fee for

each

warehouse location

with a

CCC storage

agreement

Annual

fee for

each

warehouse location

without a

CCC storage

agreement

1–150,000 ................. $145 $290

150,001–250,000 ...... 295 585

250,001–500,000 ...... 435 865

500,001–750,000 ...... 590 1,175

750,001–1,000,000 ... 730 1,460

1,000,001–1,200,000 875 1,750

1,200,001–l,500,000 1,020 2,035

1,500,001–2,000,000 1,165 2,325

2,000,001–2,500,000 1,310 2,620

2,500,001–5,000,000 1,450 2,900

5,000,001–7,500,000 1,605 3,205

7,500,001–

10,000,000 ............ 1,750 3,500

10,000,001+ .............. * 1,750 ** 3,500

* Plus $50 per million bushels above

10,000,000 or fraction thereof.

** Plus $90 per million bushels above

10,000,000 or fraction thereof.

Inspection fees will be charged at the rate of

$16 for each 10,000 bushels of licensed capacity, or fraction thereof, but in no case less

than $160 nor more than $1,600.

DRY BEANS

[In hundredweight]

Licensed capacity Annual fee

100–90,000 ............................... $800

90,001–150,000 ........................ 1,115

150,001–300,000 ...................... 1,445

300,001–450,000 ...................... 1,765

450,001–600,000 ...................... 2,080

600,001–720,000 ...................... 2,395

720,001–900,000 ...................... 2,725

900,001–1,200,000 ................... 3,045

1,200,001–1,500,000 ................ 3,355

1,500,001–3,000,000 ................ 3,675

3,000,001+ ................................ 4,000

Inspection fees will be charged at the

rate of $16 for each 1,000

hundredweight of licensed capacity, or

fraction thereof, but in no case less than

$160 nor more than $1,600.

Tobacco and Wool

Annual fee: $16 for each 100,000

pounds of licensed capacity, or fraction

thereof, but in no case less than $645.

Inspection fee: $16 for each 100,000

pounds of licensed capacity, or fraction

thereof, but in no case less than $160

nor more than $1,600.

Nuts

Annual fee: $14 for each 100 short

tons of licensed capacity, or fraction

thereof, but in no case less than $645.

Inspection fee: $8 for each 100 short

tons of licensed capacity, or fraction

thereof, of peanuts and $14 for each

1,000 hundredweight, or fraction

thereof, of other nuts, but in no case less

than $160 nor more than $1,600.

Syrup

Annual fee: $6 for each 5,000 gallons

of licensed capacity, or fraction thereof,

but in no case less than $645.

Inspection fee: $6 for each 5,000

gallons of licensed capacity, or fraction

thereof, but in no case less than $160

nor more than $1,600.

Cottonseed

Annual fee: $16 for each 1,000 short

tons of licensed capacity, or fraction

thereof, but in no case less than $645.

Inspection fee: $16 for each 1,000

short tons of licensed capacity, or

fraction thereof, but in no case less than

$160 nor more than $1,600.

Signed at Washington, D.C., on June 19,

2000.

George Arredondo,

Administrator, Farm Service Agency.

[FR Doc. 00–16060 Filed 6–23–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration

Action Affecting Export Privileges;

David Sheldon Boone

Order Denying Export Privileges

In the Matter of David Sheldon Boone

currently incarcerated at: FCI Manchester,

#43671–083, P.O. Box 3000, Manchester,

Kentucky 40962.

On February 26, 1999, David Sheldon

Boone (Boone) was convicted in the

United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Virginia on one count

of violating Section 794(a) and (c) of the

Espionage Act (18 U.S.C.A. 792–799)

(1976 & Supp. 2000)). Boone was

convicted of unlawfully and knowingly

combining, conspiring, confederating

and agreeing with other persons, both

known and unknown, including officers

of the Komitet Gosudarstvennoy

Bezopasnosty (KGB), to knowingly and

unlawfully communicate, deliver, and

transmit, and attempt to communicate,

deliver and transmit, to representatives

and agents of a foreign government,

specifically the U.S.S.R. and the Russian

Federation, directly and indirectly,

documents and information relating to

the national defense of the United

States, with the intent and reason to

believe that the same would be used to

the injury of the United States and to

the advantage of the U.S.S.R. and the

Russian Federation.

Section 11(H) of the Export

Administration Act of 1979, as amended

(currently codified at 50 U.S.C.A. app.

sections 2401–2420 (1991 & Supp.

2000)) (the Act),1 provides that, at the

discretion of the Secretary of

Commerce,2 no person convicted of

violating Section 794 of the Espionage

Act, or certain other provisions of the

United States Code, shall be eligible to

apply for or use any export license

issued pursuant to, or provided by, the

Act or the Export Administration

Regulations (currently codified at 15

CFR Parts 730–774 (1999), as amended

(65 FR 14862, March 20, 2000)) (the

Regulations), for a period of up to 10

years from the date of the conviction. In

addition, any license issued pursuant to

the Act in which such a person had any

interest at the time of conviction may be

revoked.

Pursuant to Sections 766.25 and

750.8(a) of the Regulations, upon

notification that a person has been

convicted of violating Section 794 of the

Espionage Act, the Director, Office of

Exporter Services, in consultation with

the Director, Office of Export

Enforcement, shall determine whether

to deny that person’s export privileges

for a period of up to 10 years form the

date of conviction and shall also

determine whether to revoke any license

previously issued to such a person.

Having received notice of Boonee’s

conviction for violating Section 794(a)

and (c) of the Espionage Act, and after

providing notice and an opportunity for

Boone to make a written submission to

the Bureau of Export Administration

before issuing an Order denying his

export privileges, as provided in Section

766.25 of the Regulations, I, following

consultations with the Director, Office

of Export Enforcement, have decided to

deny Boone’s export privileges for a

period of 10 years from the date of his

conviction. The 10-year period ends on

February 26, 2009. I have also decided

to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 123 / Monday, June 26, 2000 / Notices 39349

1The preliminary determination for EPS from

Korea will be published in a separate Federal

Register notice.

the Act in which Boone had an interest

at the time of his conviction.

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:

I. Until February 26, 2009, David

Sheldon Boone, currently incarcerated

at: FCI Manchester, #43671–083, P.O.

Box 3000, Manchester, Kentucky 40962,

may not, directly or indirectly,

participate in any way in any

transaction involving any commodity,

software or technology (hereinafter

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)

exported or to be exported from the

United States, that is subject to the

Regulations, or in any other activity

subject to the Regulations, including,

but not limited to:

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using

any license, License Exception, or

export control document;

B. Carrying on negotiations

concerning, or order, buying, receiving,

using, selling, delivering, storing,

disposing of, forwarding, transporting,

financing, or otherwise servicing in any

way, any transaction involving any item

exported or to be exported from the

Untied States that is subject to the

Regulations, or in any other activity

subject to the Regulations; or

C. Benefiting in any way from any

transaction involving any item exported

or to be exported from the United States

that is subject to the Regulations, or in

any other activity subject to the

Regulations.

II. No person may, directly or

indirectly, do any of the following:

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf

of the denied person any item subject to

the Regulations;

B. Take any action that facilitates the

acquisition or attempted acquisition by

the denied person of the ownership,

possession, or control of any item

subject to the Regulations that has been

or will be exported from the United

States, including financing or other

support activities related to a

transaction whereby the denied person

acquires or attempts to acquire such

ownership, possession or control;

C. Take any action to acquire from or

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted

acquisition from the denied person of

any item subject to the Regulations that

has been exported from the United

States;

D. Obtain from the denied person in

the United States any item subject to the

Regulations with knowledge or reason

to know that the item will be, or is

intended to be, exported from the

United States; or

E. Engage in any transaction to service

any item subject to the Regulations that

has been or will be exported from the

United States and which is owned,

possessed or controlled by the denied

person, or service any item, of whatever

origin, that is owned, possessed or

controlled by the denied person if such

service involves the use of any item

subject to the Regulations that has been

or will be exported from the United

States. For purposes of this paragraph,

servicing means installation,

maintenance, repair, modification or

testing.

III. After notice and opportunity for

comment as provided in Section 766.23

of the Regulations, any person, firm,

corporation, or business organization

related to Boone by affiliation,

ownership, control, or position of

responsibility in the conduct of trade or

related services may also be subject to

the provisions of this Order.

IV. This Order does not prohibit any

export, reexport, or other transaction

subject to the Regulations where the

only items involved that are subject to

the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin

technology.

V. This Order is effective immediately

and shall remain in effect until February

26, 2009.

VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the

Regulations, Boonee may file an appeal

from this Order with the Under

Secretary for Export Administration.

The appeal must be filed within 45 days

from the date of this Order and must

comply with the provisions of Part 756

of the Regulations.

VII. A copy of this Order shall be

delivered to Boonee. This Order shall be

published in the Federal Register.

Dated: June 13, 2000.

Eileen M. Albanese,

Director, Office of Exporter Services.

[FR Doc. 00–15993 Filed 6–23–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–560–810]

Notice of Preliminary Determination of

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain

Expandable Polystyrene Resins From

Indonesia

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 26, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Charles Riggle at (202) 482–0650 or

David Layton at (202) 482–0371, Import

Administration, Room 1870,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20230.

The Applicable Statute and Regulations

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the statute are references to

the provisions effective January 1, 1995,

the effective date of the amendments

made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act)

by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act

(URAA). In addition, unless otherwise

indicated, all citations to the

Department of Commerce regulations

refer to the regulations codified at 19

CFR part 351 (April 1999).

Preliminary Determination

We preliminarily determine that

certain expandable polystyrene resins

from Indonesia are being sold, or are

likely to be sold, in the United States at

less than fair value (LTFV), as provided

in section 733 of the Act. The estimated

margins of sales at LTFV are shown in

the Suspension of Liquidation section of

this notice.

Case History

On November 22, 1999, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) received petitions on

certain expandable polystyrene resins

(EPS) from Indonesia and the Republic

of Korea (Korea) filed in proper form by

BASF Corporation, Huntsman

Expandable Polymers Company LC,

Nova Chemicals Inc., and Styrochem

U.S., Ltd., (collectively the petitioners).

On December 1 and 3, 1999, the

Department received amendments to the

petitions.1

On December 13, 1999, the

Department initiated antidumping

investigations of EPS from Indonesia

and Korea. See Initiation of

Antidumping Duty Investigations:

Certain Expandable Polystyrene Resins

from Indonesia and the Republic of

Korea, 64 FR 71112 (December 20, 1999)

(Initiation Notice). Since the initiation

of this investigation, the following

events have occurred:

On January 7, 2000, the United States

International Trade Commission (the

ITC) preliminarily determined that there

is a reasonable indication that imports

of the subject merchandise are

materially injuring the U.S. industry.

See Certain Expandable Polystyrene

Resins from Indonesia and Korea, 65 FR

2429 (January 14, 2000).

On January 13, 2000, the Department

selected PT Risjad Brasali Styrindo

(Brasali), the only known Indonesian

producer/exporter of the subject