alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM

GRACE, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF MIAMI,

Defendant.

/

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

Pursuant to Local Rule 11.1(d)(3), Plaintiffs move to withdraw Janine M. Lopez from this 

case as counsel for Plaintiffs, based on the following:

1. After January 25, 2024, Ms. Lopez will no longer be employed at the ACLU Foundation 

of Florida.

2. Under Local Rule 11.1(d)(3), counsel for Plaintiffs has given the requisite notice to 

Plaintiffs and opposing counsel of Ms. Lopez’s intent to withdraw from representation.

3. Under Local Rule 7.1(a)(3), counsel for Plaintiffs has conferred with all parties regarding 

this motion. Defendant does not oppose Ms. Lopez’s withdrawal from representation. 

4. The remaining counsel of record will continue to represent Plaintiffs in this case.

5. Pursuant to Local Rule 11.1(d)(3), the current mailing addresses for Plaintiffs’ counsel are 

provided below.

THEREFORE, the Court should grant Janine M. Lopez’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel.

Dated: January 25, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Janine M. Lopez

Janine M. Lopez (FBN 1038560)

ACLU Foundation of Florida

4343 W. Flagler Street, Suite 400

Miami, FL 33134

(786) 363-2707

jlopez@aclufl.org

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2024 Page 1 of 2
2

Plaintiffs’ current counsel:

Nicholas L.V. Warren (FBN 1019018)

ACLU Foundation of Florida

336 East College Avenue, Suite 203

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(786) 363-1769

nwarren@aclufl.org

Daniel B. Tilley (FBN 102882)

Caroline A. McNamara (FBN 1038312)

ACLU Foundation of Florida

4343 West Flagler Street, Suite 400

Miami, FL 33134

(786) 363-2714

dtilley@aclufl.org

cmcnamara@aclufl.org

Gregory P. Luib*

Dechert LLP

1900 K Street NW

Washington, DC 20006

(202) 261-3413

gregory.luib@dechert.com

Neil A. Steiner*

Julia Markham-Cameron*

Dechert LLP

gree Bryant Park

1095 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036

(212) 698-3822

neil.steiner@dechert.com

julia.markham-cameron@dechert.com

Christopher J. Merken*

Dechert LLP

Cira Centre

2929 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19104

(215) 994-2380

christopher.merken@dechert.com

* Admitted pro hac vice

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2024 Page 2 of 2
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 792

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form,

join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such activities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska,

Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. BLILEY, Mr.

BONILLA, Mrs. BONO, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. BRYANT, Mr. BURR of

North Carolina, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CALLAHAN, Mr. CALVERT,

Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. CANNON, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. COBURN, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. COOK, Mr. DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. DELAY, Mr. DICKEY, Mr.

DOOLITTLE, Mr. FOLEY, Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. GANSKE, Mr. GOODE, Mr.

GOSS, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. HASTINGS

of Washington, Mr. HAYES, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. HERGER,

Mr. HILLEARY, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. ISTOOK, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas,

Mr. KASICH, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. LINDER, Mr.

MANZULLO, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr.

MCINTOSH, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. OXLEY, Mr.

PAUL, Mr. PITTS, Mr. POMBO, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. RILEY, Mr. RYUN

of Kansas, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr.

SOUDER, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. STUMP, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. THUNE, Mr. WAMP, Mr.

WATKINS, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mrs. WILSON, Mr. WOLF, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr.

WICKER, and Mr. PACKARD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to

refrain from such activities.
2

•HR 792 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Right-to5 Work Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELA7 TIONS ACT.

8 (a) Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act

9 (the ‘‘Act’’) (29 U.S.C. 157) is amended by striking ‘‘ex10 cept to’’ and all that follows through ‘‘authorized in sec11 tion 8(a)(3)’’.

12 (b) Section 8(a) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(a)) is

13 amended by striking ‘‘: Provided, That’’ and all that fol14 lows through ‘‘retaining membership’’ in paragraph (3).

15 (c) Section 8(b) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(b)) is

16 amended by striking ‘‘or to discriminate’’ and all that fol17 lows through ‘‘retaining membership’’ in paragraph (2)

18 and by striking ‘‘covered by an agreement authorized

19 under subsection (a)(3) of this section’’ in paragraph (5).

20 (d) Section 8(f) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(f)) is

21 amended by striking clause (2) and by redesignating

22 clauses (3) and (4) as (2) and (3), respectively.
3

•HR 792 IH

1 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT.

2 Section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152)

3 is amended by striking paragraph Eleventh.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6563

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GBOLAHAN FRANCIS TAYO, a/k/a Douglas Warren

Johnson, a/k/a John Doe,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CR-95-28-BR, CA-95-106-5)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gbolahan Francis Tayo, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas B. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

Appellant's motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Tayo, No. CR-95-28-BR; CA-95-106-5

(E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Skip to NOAA Navigation

Skip to Main Content

Skip to Main Navigation

Skip to Topic Navigation

Skip to Search

        - NOAA HOME
        - WEATHER
        - OCEANS
        - FISHERIES
        - CHARTING
        - SATELLITES
        - CLIMATE
        - RESEARCH
        - COASTS
        - CAREERS

      - Program Services  Participants List  Publications  Training  Offices & Staff- Offices
- Staff
  Export Certification- Export Certification
- EU Exports  
- International Services
-  FAQs  
- Links  
-  

Email UsPay.GovOnline Request SystemHome

Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Skip to NOAA NavigationSkip to Main ContentSkip to Main NavigationSkip to Topic NavigationSkip to Search
**Effective immediately the main phone number for the Seafood Inspection Program is 301-427-8300**
**NOAA Inspection Manual 25**
Return to Table of Contents

**Chapter Six: Auditing Personnel Requirements**
- Lead Auditor
- Audit Team Members

**Chapter Seven: Certification**
- Instructions for Completing the Certificate of Inspection
- Instructions for Completing the Memorandum of  Inspection/Certificate of Loading
- Instructions for Completing Lot Inspection Certificates
- Instructions for       Completing the Certificate of Origin
- Instructions for Completing EU Export Certificates
EU Non-Molluscan Health Certificates
EU Molluscan Shellfish Health Certificates
IUU Catch Certificate
 The Issuance of IUU Catch Certificates for Shipments Going to Non-EU Countries
 Annex IV
 Harvest Date  Attestation Letter for Product Caught Prior to January 1, 2010

Procedures for EU Policy Nonconformance

- Instructions  for Completing Export Health Certificates – non EU
- Instructions for       Certifying Fish & Fishery Products for China 
- Instructions for       Certifying Salmonid Products to Australia
- Instructions for       Certifying Fish & Fishery Products to French Colonial Territories
- Instructions for Completing Export Health Certificates  to the Republic of Korea
- Prohibited       Products for Certification    - Canada’s        Position on Artificial Color in Cooked Shrimp
  - Bloody Catfish
- Inspection and       Certification of Processing Methods
Cryovac Vacuum        Packaged Marine Fresh Fish Products (Salt Water Species Only) (to be added)
Vacuum Packaged        Hot-Processed Smoked or Hot-Processed Smoke-Flavored Salmon (to be added)
Vacuum and        Modified Atmosphere Packaged (VAC and MAP) Marine and Estuarine Bulk Raw        Fishery Products Held at Only Refrigerated Temperatures (non-frozen) (to be added)

**Chapter Eight:  Appendix**
- Glossary/Nomenclature
- Official AOAC       Methods
- Updates,       Additions, and Changes
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2000 P
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2000 P
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2000 P
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2000 P
Form of Letter Agreement


 




EXHIBIT 4.2




July 29, 2019
















Dear           :




In a conference call held on July 16 with a number of Nocopi’s convertible debenture holders, the convertible debenture holders present and I discussed alternatives related to the debentures that are maturing during the third quarter of 2019. There are several options available to you. 1) the debentures and accrued interest can be converted into restricted common stock of the Company at $0.025; 2) the debentures and accrued interest can be redeemed for cash; 3) a portion of the debentures and accrued interest can be converted into restricted common stock of the Company at $0.025 with the balance being redeemed for cash. An alternative not discussed and subject to approval by the Board of Directors is a one year extension of the maturity date of your convertible debenture to the third quarter of 2020 with interest continuing to accrue at 7%. I’m available to discuss the options, (xxx) xxx-xxxx. Feel free to contact Rudy at the office as well, (610) 834-9600. The status of your convertible debenture is listed below. Also attached is a W-9 form which will be required as the interest income, whether paid in cash or converted, may need to be reported on a Form 1099.  

		
	 
	Sincerely,


	 
	 

	 
	Michael A. Feinstein


	 
	Chairman










Amount of Note: 

Current Maturity Date: 

Accrued Interest to Current Maturity Date: 

Selection:

1)

Conversion of all principal and interest to restricted stock _____

2)

Payment of all principal and interest _____

3)

Conversion of a portion of principal (amount  _______ ) and balance in cash

4)

One year extension of principal and interest _____

Please email your response to me and Rudy at xxxxxx@xxxxxx.com and rudy@nocopi.com or fax to the Company at (610) 834-7777.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25974]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8934]

Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice; Closed 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State 
Department--Overseas Security Advisory Council on November 18, 2014. 
Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. Appendix), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(7)(E), 
it has been determined that the meeting will be closed to the public. 
The meeting will focus on an examination of corporate security policies 
and procedures and will involve extensive discussion of trade secrets 
and proprietary commercial information that is privileged and 
confidential, and will discuss law enforcement investigative techniques 
and procedures. The agenda will include updated committee reports, a 
global threat overview, and other matters relating to private sector 
security policies and protective programs and the protection of U.S. 
business information overseas.
    For more information, contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, 
phone: 571-345-2214.

    Dated: October 2, 2014.
Bill A. Miller,
Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-25974 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
No. 10-1368.

#### Nejad *v.*Georgia.

Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: 22-1760: FG SRC, LLC v. INTEL CORPORATION [ORDER], Nonprecedential
#### § 301-54.101 Can my agency initiate collection of undisputed delinquent amounts if it has not reimbursed me for amounts reimbursable under the applicable travel regulations?

No, your agency may only collect undisputed delinquent amounts for which you have been reimbursed under the applicable travel regulations. However, if you have not submitted a proper travel claim within the timeframe requirements of § 301-52.7 of this chapter, and there are no extenuating circumstances, your agency may collect the undisputed delinquent amounts based on the amounts charged on the travel charge card.
2013-2014 FSA Application Commenters Listing

The following is a listing of the individuals or organizations that provided comments on the 2013-2014 FSA Application. Comments 

were collected August 15, 2012 thru October 15, 2012. A summary of the comments received is provided separately.

1) Mila Dwelley Tappan, Finance Authority of Maine

2) Amy M. Duca, Fox Valley Technical College

3) Steve McGrath, Educational Talent Search/TRIO

4) Lanetta Phillips, Tuscumbia Educational Talent Search

5) Margaret Zitzer, Marquette University

6) Donna Schafer, Community Technical School

7) Susan Garibaldi, University of Southern California

8) Robyn Rhyner, Jefferson Community College

9) Robert Foultz, West Chester University

10) Robert Foultz, West Chester University

11) Robyn Tanger, Northcentral Technical College

12) Deborah Porter, Georgia Southern University

13) Jana Haile, Boston University

14) Stuart Perry, College of Saint Benedict

15) Donna Freeman, The Richard Stockton College of NJ

16) Caryn Rose, Anne Arundel Community College

17) Patricia Hurley, Glendale Community College 

18) Donna Freeman, The Richard Stockton College of NJ

19) Karen McCarthy, on behalf of NASFAA

20) Julie Leeper, on behalf of NASSGAP

21) Margaret Young, Mohave Community College

22) Molly Jefferds, Anne Arundel Community College

23) Vicki Shipley, on behalf of NCHELP
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15705]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2417]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceedings

June 15, 2000.
    Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice 
and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of 
this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 
12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to 
these petitions must be filed by July 7, 2000. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of 
the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition 
must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has 
expired.
    Subject: Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Multiple 
Address Systems (WT Docket No. 97-81).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 3.
    Subject: 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review--Review of Depreciation 
Requirements for Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (CC Docket No. 98-
137).
    Number of Petitions File: 1.
    Subject: Local Compensation and Broadband Reporting (CC Docket No. 
99-301).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15705 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 783

To ensure the availability of spectrum to amateur radio operators.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To ensure the availability of spectrum to amateur radio

operators.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Amateur Radio Spec5 trum Protection Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds the following:

8 (1) More than 650,000 radio amateurs in the

9 United States are licensed by the Federal Commu10 nications Commission.
2

•HR 783 IH

1 (2) Among the basic purposes of the Amateur

2 Radio and Amateur Satellite Services are to provide

3 voluntary, noncommercial radio service, particularly

4 emergency communications.

5 (3) Emergency communications services by vol6 unteer amateur radio operators have consistently

7 and reliably been provided before, during, and after

8 floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, forest fires, earth9 quakes, blizzards, train accidents, chemical spills,

10 and other disasters.

11 (4) The Federal Communications Commission

12 has taken actions which have resulted in the loss of

13 at least 107 MHz of spectrum to radio amateurs.

14 SEC. 3. FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING REALLOCATION OF

15 AMATEUR RADIO SPECTRUM.

16 Section 303 of the Communications Act of 1934 is

17 amended by adding at the end the following new sub18 section:

19 ‘‘(z) Notwithstanding subsection (c), after July 1,

20 1999—

21 ‘‘(1) make no reallocation of primary allocations

22 of bands of frequencies of the amateur radio and

23 amateur satellite services;
3

•HR 783 IH

1 ‘‘(2) not diminish the secondary allocations of

2 bands of frequencies to the amateur radio or ama3 teur satellite service; and

4 ‘‘(3) make no additional allocations within such

5 bands of frequencies that would substantially reduce

6 the utility thereof to the amateur radio or amateur

7 satellite service;

8 unless the Commission, at the same time, provides equiva9 lent replacement spectrum to amateur radio and amateur

10 satellite service.’’.

Æ
#### § 102-81.10 What basic physical security policy governs Federal agencies?

The Interagency Security Committee (ISC) is responsible for developing and evaluating physical security standards for nonmilitary Federal facilities. In accordance with E.O. 12977, the ISC sets policies and recommendations that govern physical security at Federal facilities and on Federal grounds occupied by Federal employees for nonmilitary activities. This includes the ISC Risk Management Process Standard (the RMP Standard) that Federal agencies use in the protection of the real property they occupy, including the protection of persons on the property. The goal of the RMP Standard is a level of protection commensurate with the level of risk. ISC policies do not supersede other laws, regulations, and Executive orders that are intended to protect unique assets.
§ 105-68.715 What notice does the suspending official give me if I am suspended? After deciding to suspend you, the suspending official promptly sends you a Notice of Suspension advising you— ( a ) That you have been suspended;
( b ) That your suspension is based on— ( 1 ) An indictment;
( 2 ) A conviction;
( 3 ) Other adequate evidence that you have committed irregularities which seriously reflect on the propriety of further Federal Government dealings with you; or
( 4 ) Conduct of another person that has been imputed to you, or your affiliation with a suspended or debarred person;
( c ) Of any other irregularities in terms sufficient to put you on notice without disclosing the Federal Government's evidence;
( d ) Of the cause(s) upon which we relied under § 105-68.700 for imposing suspension;
( e ) That your suspension is for a temporary period pending the completion of an investigation or resulting legal or debarment proceedings;
( f ) Of the applicable provisions of this subpart, subpart F of this part, and any other GSA procedures governing suspension decision making; and
( g ) Of the governmentwide effect of your suspension from procurement and nonprocurement programs and activities.
EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       STATE OR OTHER
                                                                       JURISDICTION OF                PERCENTAGE
                                                                       INCORPORATION                  OWNERSHIP
PARENT                                                                 ---------------                ----------
------
<S>                                                                    <C>                              <C>
Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.                                                 Maryland                          --


SUBSIDIARY (1)
--------------

The Patapsco Bank                                                      Maryland                         100%


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE PATAPSCO BANK (1)
---------------------------------

PFSL Holding Corp.                                                     Maryland                         100%

Prime Business Leasing                                                 Maryland                         100%

Patapsco Financial Services, Inc.                                      Maryland                         100%
<FN>
________________
(1)  The assets,  liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in
     the  consolidated  financial  statements  contained in the Annual Report to
     Stockholders attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
</FN>
</TABLE>
404 A.2d 1356

#### Commonwealth v. Mowery, Appellant. Commonwealth ex rel. Mowery v. Hewitt. Appeal of Mowery.

Submitted September 15,1978.

Charles E. Mowery, in pro. per.; Stew-

art L. Kurtz, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, SPAETH and LIPEZ, JJ.

Orders affirmed.

CERCONE, P. J., concurred in the result.
No. 11-983.

#### Ticketmaster et al. *v.*Stearns et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.