alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM ATLANTIC
INTERNATIONAL ENTERTAINMENT, LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                          (173,875)
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                1,280,968
<PP&E>                                                            675,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  (276,174)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  4,898,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           1,214,989
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                           13,614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                                      3,529,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    4,878,298
<SALES>                                                           850,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  850,950
<CGS>                                                             109,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   7,379,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  949,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 54,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (7,012,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    (123,691)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (6,888,921)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   (54,261)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (6,943,182)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.55)


</TABLE>
ex10-3.htm


Exhibit 10.3

 

AMENDMENT TO 

SALON MEDIA GROUP, INC.

STOCK EXCHANGE AGREEMENT

 

This amendment to that certain stock exchange agreement (the “Stock Exchange Agreement”) executed November 10, 2016 by Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”), and William Hambrecht, is made as of January 19, 2017 to amend the class of shares that Mr. Hambrecht will receive pursuant to the Stock Exchange Agreement. As the Company does not have sufficient authorized shares of Common Stock to fully satisfy Mr. Hambrecht’s exchange of his related party advances (the “Related Party Advances”), Mr. Hambrecht agrees to accept a combination of shares of Common Stock and Series A Mandatorily Convertible Voting Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”). In lieu of receiving 29,130,000 shares of Common Stock for his Related Party Advances aggregating $2,913,000, Mr. Hambrecht agrees to receive 2,246,017 shares of Common Stock 268,840 shares of Series A Preferred Stock upon the execution of the Purchase Agreement dated January 24, 2017 and the initial closing of the Private Placement, in full satisfaction of the Company’s obligations. Upon the Company’s filing of the Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the Company’s authorized share capital, the shares Series A Preferred Stock will convert to shares of Common Stock of the Company. 

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary as stated in Section 1 and Schedule B of the Stock Exchange Agreement, the Stock Exchange Agreement remains in all respects in full force and effect.

 

 

	
 
	
SALON MEDIA GROUP, INC.

 

/s/ Jordan Hoffner                                                           

 

Dated:   1/19/17                                                                 

 

 

 

  

WILLIAM HAMBRECHT

 

/s/ William Hambrecht                                                    

 

Dated:   1/19/17
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dean G. Stamos., certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, Vie Financial Group, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vie
Financial Group, Inc





|      |  |               | 
|----- |  | ------------- | 
|Date: |  | June 30, 2003 | 
|      |  |               | 





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vie Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by Vie Financial Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT11.2**

**DUKEREALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

**EARNINGSTO DEBT SERVICE CALCULATIONS**

**(inthousands)**

 
|                                                                 |   | **DECEMBER 31,  2001** |       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|------------|
| Consolidated net income  available for common units                  |   | $                      | 262,430    |   |
| Gain on land and depreciated  property sales                         |   | (45,708                | )          |
| Recurring principal  amortization                                    |   | 10,043                 |       |
| Interest expense (excludes  amortization of deferred financing fees) |   | 109,241                |       |
| earnings before debt service                                         |   | 336,006                |       |
|                                                                 |   |                   |       |
| Interest expense (excludes  amortization of deferred financing fees) |   | $                      | 109,241    |   |
| Recurring principal  amortization                                    |   | 10,043                 |       |
| total debt service                                                   |   | 119,284                |       |
|                                                                 |   |                   |       |
| **DEBT SERVICE RATIO**                                               |   | **2.82**               | ** ** |

 

----
Order filed July 26, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 18
- 00538
- CV

____________ THE GULF COAST CENTE R , Appellant

V. DANIEL CURRY, JR. , Appellee
On Appeal from the 56th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16
- CV
- 0781



### ORDER This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 9, 2018. A related case was previously filed in the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas under case number 01

- 17

- 00834

- CV. It is ORDERED that the appeal docketed under this court ’ s appellate cause number 14

- 18

- 00538

- CV is transferred to the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas pursuant to Local Rule 1.5. 14th Tex. App. (Houston) Loc. R. 1.5. TheClerk of this Court is directed to transfer all p apers filed in the case, and certify all

Orders made, to the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas. PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dinesh
R. Desai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

                                                 /s/ Dinesh R. Desai
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 January 22, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shareem Giles, Appellant.

[628 NYS2d 574]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered July 29,1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the sixth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 6, 2012

s0703 

# Order

July 6, 2012

145227

SC: 145227

In re HILLS, Minors. COA: 304428

Oakland CC Family Division:

2010

- 777100

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Corautus Genetics Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert T. Atwood, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert T. AtwoodRobert T. AtwoodExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 22, 2005
§ 102-73.65 Are there any limitations on leasing certain types of space? Yes, the limitations on leasing certain types of space are as follows: ( a ) In general, Federal agencies may not lease any space to accommodate computer and telecommunications operations; secure or sensitive activities related to the national defense or security; or a permanent courtroom, judicial chamber, or administrative office for any United States court, if the average annual net rental cost of leasing such space would exceed the prospectus threshold (40 U.S.C. 3307(f)(1)).
( b ) However, Federal agencies may lease such space if the Administrator of General Services first determines that leasing such space is necessary to meet requirements that cannot be met in public buildings, and then submits such determination to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives in accordance with 40 U.S.C. 3307(f)(2).
Case 1:22-cv-24268-JEM   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2024   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-24268-JEM   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2024   Page 2 of 2
024P15

#### State v. Juan Carlos Benitez

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA14-542)

1. Allowed 01/16/2015

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Allowed

3. State’s PDR

3. Allowed

4. State’s Petition for Writ of *Certiorari*to Review Order of COA

4. Dismissed as moot
#### § 109-38.5201 Definition.

As used in this subpart the following definition applies:

*Watercraft* means any vessel used to transport persons or material on water.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50833 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
KEVIN CHARLESTON ALLEN HARRIS, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:17

- CR

- 202

- 1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kevin Charleston Allen Harris, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Harris has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein , as well as Harris ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 26, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50833 Document: 00514529061 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/26/2018No. 17

- 50833

2 that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
A ccordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-50833 Document: 00514529061 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/26/2018
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) Environmental Chemical Corporation ) ) ) Under Contract Nos. FA8903-06-D-8511 ) FA8903-04-D-8672 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 61067, 61070, 61115 61116, 61159

Richard B. Oliver, Esq.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Los Angeles, CA Glenn A. Sweatt, Esq.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Palo Alto, CA Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.

Air Force Deputy ChiefTrial Attorney AnnaF. Kurtz, Esq. Capt Ryan P. Payne, USAF

Trial Attorneys OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE THRASHER The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment in favor ofappellant. 

### It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties' request, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature ofa consentjudgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of$3,974,594.23. This amount is inclusive ofinterest. No further interest shall be paid. Dated: 26 September 2017

(Signatures continued) Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals Adminis ative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61067, 61070, 61115, 61116, 61159, Appeals ofEnvironmental Chemical Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
EXHIBIT 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|March 26, 2009 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                                     
|-------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|               | Marc N. Teal                                         
|               | (Principal Financial Officer), BCTC IV Assignor Corp.
|               |
#### § 109-45.309-53 Nuclear-related or proliferation-sensitive property.

Nuclear-related or proliferation-sensitive property shall be made available for sale only after the stripping and certification requirements of § 109-43.307-52 of this subpart have been met.
#### § 300-2.21 How is the rule expressed in the question and answer format?

The rule is expressed in both the question and answer.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00803

- CV

Kelly Clark Lewis, Appellant

v.

Gordon Joseph Lewis, Appellee

FROM THE 419TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- FM

- 19

- 000502 , THE HONORABLE CATH ERINE MAUZY, JUDGE P RESIDIN G

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant ’s brief was originally due on January 21, 2020

. On March 3, 2020 , this

C ourt sent a notice to appellant informing her that her brief was overdue and that a failure to file

a sati sfactory response by March 13, 2020

, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want

of p rosecution. To date, appellant has no t filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R . App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Bak er and Triana

Dismiss ed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: March 31, 2020
Exhibit
      32.1











**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the
      “ Operating
      Partnership ”)
      hereby
      certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
      accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2005 (the “ Report ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating
      Partnership.





Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.





Date:
                March 3, 2006
            /s/
                Stanley K. TangerStanley
                K. Tanger
              Chief
                Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust, Sole General Partner of the
                Registrant
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Philip M. McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that the Annual Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Kfor the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Kfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.
| Date: December 27, 2005 | By:    | /s/ PHILIP  M. MCDERMOTT |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                         | Name:  | Philip M. McDermott      |
|                         | Title: | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

----
#### § 102-34.185 What license plates do we use on motor vehicles that are exempt from motor vehicle identification requirements?

For motor vehicles that are exempt from motor vehicle identification requirements, display the regular license plates of the State, Commonwealth, territory or possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia, where the motor vehicle is principally operated (see § 102-34.120).