alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

David J. Smith

Clerk of Court 

July 17, 2024

For rules and forms visit

www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Clerk - Southern District of Florida 

U.S. District Court 

400 N MIAMI AVE

MIAMI, FL 33128-1810 

Appeal Number: 24-11550-CC 

Case Style: GRACE, Inc., et al v. City of Miami

District Court Docket No: 1:22-cv-24066-KMM

The enclosed copy of the Clerk's Order of Dismissal pursuant to the joint stipulation of the 

parties to dismiss is issued as the mandate of this court. 

Any pending motions are now rendered moot in light of the attached order. 

Clerk's Office Phone Numbers 

General Information: 404-335-6100 Attorney Admissions: 404-335-6122 

Case Administration: 404-335-6135 Capital Cases: 404-335-6200 

CM/ECF Help Desk: 404-335-6125 Cases Set for Oral Argument: 404-335-6141 

Enclosure(s) 

DIS-3 Letter and Entry of Dismissal Vol

 

USCA11 Case: 24-11550 Document: 18 Date Filed: 07/17/2024 Page: 1 of 2 

JG Jul 17, 2024 MIAMI

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 199 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2024 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 24-11550-CC

______________ 

GRACE, INC., 

ENGAGE MIAMI, INC., 

SOUTH DADE BRANCH OF THE NAACP, 

MIAMI-DADE BRANCH OF THE NAACP, 

CLARICE COOPER, et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

versus

CITY OF MIAMI, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

__________________________________________

ORDER: Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant City of Miami is GRANTED 

by clerk [10241526-2]. Pursuant to FRAP 42 and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above referenced 

appeal was duly entered dismissed on this date. 

Effective July 17, 2024. 

DAVID J. SMITH

Clerk of Court of the United States Court

of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION 

USCA11 Case: 24-11550 Document: 18 Date Filed: 07/17/2024 Page: 2 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 199 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2024 Page 2 of 2
AMERICAN GENERAL CORPORATION
             FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 1997




                                                                   Exhibit 11 


                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                    (Unaudited)
                        (In millions, except share data)

                                                        Six Months Ended
                                                            June 30,         
                                                       1997          1996    
Primary:

   Net income available to common stock .......           $  86         $ 359 

   Average shares outstanding
     Common stock .............................     240,786,060   243,831,111 
     Assumed conversion of convertible
       preferred stock ........................       1,969,035     1,366,707 
     Assumed exercise of stock options ........       1,114,004     1,001,664 

       Total ..................................     243,869,099   246,199,482 

   Net income per share .......................           $ .36         $1.46 


Fully Diluted:

   Net income .................................           $  86         $ 359 
   Plus:  Net dividends on convertible 
    preferred securities of subsidiary ........               5             5 

       Net income available to common stock ...           $  91         $ 364 


   Average shares outstanding
     Common stock .............................     240,786,060   243,831,111 
     Assumed conversion of convertible 
       preferred securities of subsidiary .....       6,144,016     6,144,016 
     Assumed conversion of convertible 
       preferred stock ........................       2,371,387     1,636,416 
     Assumed exercise of stock options ........       1,364,362     1,134,888 

       Total ..................................     250,665,825   252,746,431 

   Net income per share .......................           $ .36         $1.44 
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,407
<PP&E>                                          11,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,472
<BONDS>                                          1,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        203
<COMMON>                                         1,248
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,551
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,503
<SALES>                                          5,830
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,893
<CGS>                                            4,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  77
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    573
<INCOME-TAX>                                       195
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                339
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46
        

</TABLE>
§ 109-50.205 Procedure. ( a ) The DOE facility will set aside an appropriate amount of excess and/or surplus education-related and Federal research equipment for transfer under this program.
( b ) A list of available education-related and Federal research equipment will be prepared and distributed to eligible recipients and the chief State School Board Officer.
( c ) Precollege institutions with partnership arrangements with the DOE or its facilities (*e.g.,* an adopted school) may receive gifts of equipment in support of the partnership.
( d ) Precollege institutions not in a partnership with DOE may receive equipment at the recommendation of the chief State School Board Officer. The Chief State School Board Officer will determine which schools within the state will receive which equipment. Consideration for placement of the equipment should be based on: ( 1 ) The elementary or secondary schools determined to have the greatest need; or
( 2 ) Recipients of federally funded math and science projects where the equipment would further enhance the progress of the project.
( e ) Eligible recipients will have 30 days to select and freeze, on a first come, first serve basis, the items desired and submit a request for selected items stating: ( 1 ) Why the gift is needed; and
( 2 ) How the gift will be used to improve math and science curricula or in the conduct of technical and scientific education and research activities.
( f ) The cost of shipping should be minimal and not more than the actual equipment value.
( g ) An Equipment Gift Agreement will be prepared and used to provide the gift to eligible recipients. The gift agreement will be in the format provided in section 109-50.4801 of this subchapter. The agreement shall be numbered for control purposes, and signed by the Office of Science's Office of Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) or the HCA or designee, as appropriate, and an appropriate official representing the eligible recipient.
NO. 12-08-00493-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RICHARD WADE MATHEWS, § APPEAL FROM THE 173RD

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant entered a guilty plea to the offense of burglary of a habitation and was placed on

community supervision for five years. The trial court certified that this is a plea bargain case and

that Appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX.R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The certification is signed by

Appellant and his trial counsel. Appellant subsequently sought the trial court’s permission to appeal,

which was denied on January 12, 2009. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(B). Accordingly, the appeal is

dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered January 14, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
#### § 301-74.9 Are there any special requirements for sponsoring or funding a conference at a hotel, motel or other place of public accommodation?

Yes. When you sponsor or fund (see 15 U.S.C. 2225a), in whole or in part, a conference at a place of public accommodation in the United States, you must use an approved accommodation (see § 300-3.1 of this title), except as provided in § 301-74.10. This provision also applies to the government of the District of Columbia when it expends Federal funds for a conference and any non-Federal entity which uses Government funds to sponsor or fund a conference.

[FTR Amdt. 89, 65 FR 1327, Jan. 10, 2000. Redesignated and amended by FTR Amdt. 2013-01, 78 FR 65212, Oct. 31, 2013]
§ 301-70.801 When may we authorize travel on Government aircraft? You may authorize travel on Government aircraft only as follows: ( a ) For official travel when— ( 1 ) No scheduled commercial airline service is reasonably available to fulfill your agency's travel requirement (*i.e.,* able to meet the traveler's departure and/or arrival requirements within a 24-hour period, unless you demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances require a shorter period); or
( 2 ) The cost of using a Government aircraft is not more than the cost of the city-pair fare for scheduled commercial airline service or the cost of the lowest available full coach fare if a city-pair fare is not available to the traveler.
( b ) For required-use travel, *i.e.,* when the traveler is authorized to use Government aircraft because of bona fide communications needs (e.g., 24-hour secure communications are required) or security reasons (e.g., highly unusual circumstances that present a clear and present danger to the traveler) or exceptional scheduling requirements (e.g., a national emergency or other compelling operational considerations). Required-use travel may include travel for official, personal, or political purposes, but must be approved in accordance with §§ 301-10.262(a) and 301-70.803(a).
( c ) For space available travel when— ( 1 ) The aircraft is already scheduled for use for an official purpose and carrying an official traveler(s) on the aircraft does not cause the need for a larger aircraft or result in more than minor additional cost to the Government; or
( 2 ) The Federal traveler or the dependent of a Federal traveler is stationed by the Government in a remote location not accessible to commercial airline service; or
( 3 ) The traveler is authorized to travel space available under 10 U.S.C. 2648 and regulations implementing that statute.
[FTR Amdt. 2004-02, 69 FR 34305, June 21, 2004, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2010-04, 75 FR 59095, Sept. 27, 2010]
§ 105-1.109-52 Cross-references. ( a ) Within chapter 105, cross-references to the FPMR shall be made in the same manner as used within the FPMR. Illustrations of cross-references to the FPMR are: ( 1 ) Part 101-3;
( 2 ) Subpart 101-3.1;
( 3 ) § 101-3.413-5.
( b ) Within chapter 105, cross-references to parts, subparts, sections, and subsections of chapter 105 shall be made in a manner generally similar to that used in making cross-references to the FPMR. For example, this paragraph would be referenced as § 105-1.109-52(b).
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5643

To amend the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 to clarify the authority

of the Administrator of General Services to provide services and facilities

to Presidents-elect and Vice-Presidents-elect.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 6, 2000

Mr. BACHUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 to clarify

the authority of the Administrator of General Services

to provide services and facilities to Presidents-elect and

Vice-Presidents-elect.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5643 IH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY OF ADMINIS2 TRATOR OF GENERAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE

3 SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO PRESIDENTS4 ELECT AND VICE-PRESIDENTS-ELECT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(c) of the Presidential

6 Transition Act of 1963 (3 U.S.C. 102 note) is amended

7 to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(c) In this Act the terms ‘President-elect’ and ‘Vice9 President-elect’ mean—

10 ‘‘(1) subject to paragraph (2), such individuals

11 as are the apparent successful candidates for the of12 fice of President and Vice President, respectively, as

13 ascertained by the Administrator following the gen14 eral elections held to determine the electors of Presi15 dent and Vice President in accordance with sections

16 1 and 2 of title 3, United States Code; or

17 ‘‘(2) the individuals who, based on the certifi18 cations by States and the District of Columbia of

19 the successful candidates for the office of President

20 and Vice President as ascertained in such general

21 elections, would have a majority of the whole num22 ber of the votes of electors to be appointed by all

23 States and the District of Columbia under article II

24 of the Constitution and voting under article XII of

25 the Constitution if all of the electors that may be ap26 pointed by a State or the District of Columbia voted
3

•HR 5643 IH

1 for the individuals so certified by the State or the

2 District of Columbia, respectively.’’.

3 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub4 section (a) shall apply with respect to each general election

5 held on or after November 7, 2000.

6 (c) REIMBURSEMENT.—The Administrator of Gen7 eral Services shall use amounts available to carry out sec8 tion 3 of the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 (3

9 U.S.C. 102 note) for fiscal year 2001 to reimburse costs

10 incurred after November 26, 2000, on behalf of a Presi11 dent-elect or Vice-President-elect for services and facilities

12 described in that section.

Æ
#### § 102-85.205 What happens if a customer agency continues occupancy after the expiration of an OA?

A mutual goal of GSA and its customers is to have current OAs in place for all space assignments. However, provisions are necessary to cover the GSA and customer relationship if an OA expires prior to execution of a mutually desired succeeding agreement. Because the risks, liabilities, and consequences of a customer's continued occupancy depend on whether the assigned space is leased or Federally owned, different provisions in the following table apply:

| In leased space | In federally owned space |
| --- | --- |
| To pay those costs associated with lease contract, GSA fee, and damages/claims, arising from changes in GSA contract costs which are caused by the tenant's delay | To pay Rent as determined by GSA's pricing policy, as described in this part, and those added costs to GSA (claims, damages, changes, etc.) resulting from the tenant-caused delay. |

Holdover Tenancy—Customer Agency Responsibilities in the Event of Tenant Delay in Vacating Space
#### § 301-10.143 What is my liability if I improperly use a foreign air carrier?

You will not be reimbursed for any transportation cost for which you improperly use foreign air carrier service. If you are authorized by your agency to use U.S. flag air carrier service for your entire trip, and you improperly use a foreign air carrier for any part of or the entire trip (*i.e.,* when not permitted under this regulation), your transportation cost on the foreign air carrier will not be payable by your agency. If your agency authorizes you to use U.S. flag air carrier service for part of your trip and foreign air carrier service for another part of your trip, and you improperly use a foreign air carrier (*i.e.,* when neither authorized to do so nor otherwise permitted under this regulation), your agency will pay the transportation cost on the foreign air carrier for only the portion(s) of the trip for which you were authorized to use foreign air carrier service. The agency must establish internal procedures for denying reimbursement to travelers when use of a foreign air carrier was neither authorized nor otherwise permitted under this regulation.
No. 11-9398.

#### Andre *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Comments on: 2021-1777: Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp.
EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-53507,  333-95577 and 333-90606) and on Form S-8
(No.   333-90035  and   333-36359)  of   Silverstar   Holdings,   Ltd  (formerly
Leisureplanet  Holdings,  Ltd) of our report dated August 19, 2003,  relating to
the  consolidated  financial  statements for the years ended June 30, 2003, 2002
and 2001, which appear in this Form 10-K.



/s/ RACHLIN COHEN & HOLTZ LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
September 29, 2003
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 581

To provide for the retention of the name of the geologic formation known

as ‘‘Devils Tower’’ at the Devils Tower National Monument in the

State of Wyoming.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. CUBIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

A BILL

To provide for the retention of the name of the geologic

formation known as ‘‘Devils Tower’’ at the Devils Tower

National Monument in the State of Wyoming.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding any other authority of law, the

4 mountain located 44°42′58′′ N., by 104°35′32′′ W., shall

5 continue to be named and referred to for all purposes as

6 Devils Tower.

Æ
June 15, 2015

Mr. Rodolfo Lomeli Quevedo

185 Bricknell Lane Coppell, TX 75019

Dear Mr. Quevedo:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 13, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1640), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# Comments on: 20-1958: WOLFE v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION], Precedential
#### Simon Simpson v. Kirschbaum *&*Co.

Review, *Not before Final Judgment.*Neither a motion to dismiss an action, nor a motion to dismiss an attachment, is reviewable until a final judgment has been rendered.

*Error from Cloud District Court.*

The case is stated in the opinion.

*L. J. Grans,*for plaintiff in error.

*Kennett & Pech,*for defendants in error.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

The petition in error filed in this court contains the following allegations:

> “1. The court erred in overruling the motion of the defendant below to quash the summons and dismiss the action.

> “2. The court erred in overruling the motion of the defendant below to discharge the attachment and to dismiss the action.”

These alleged errors cannot be considered. The record does not purport to contain the trial of the case, or any judgment, and we Cannot assume that a final judgment has- been rendered.

In *Brown v. Kimble,*5 Kas. 80, it was decided that—

> “The denial of a motion to dismiss an action made by the defendant, is not one of the orders of the district court from which error lies to this court until the final disposition of the action.”

In *Dolbee v. Hoover,*8 Kas. 124, it was also decided that—

> “ The denial of a motion to dismiss an action made by the defendant, is not one of the orders of the district court from which error lies to the supreme court until the final disposition of the action in the court below.”

It was held in *Snavely v. Buggy Co.,*36 Kas. 106, that—

> “An order of the district court overruling a motion to dis*37charge an attachment is not reviewable in the supreme court until a final judgment has been rendeied in the case.”

This disposes of the case, and it must be dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.
#### § 109-43.307-2 Hazardous materials.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 8, 2022

NO. 03-22-00293-CV

A. A. O., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on May 11, 2022. Having reviewed the 

record, the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted her appeal and did not comply with a 

notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of

prosecution. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the 

court below.