alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4177 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4177

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 1601 
   Highway 35 in Middletown, New Jersey, as the ``Candace White Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 1601 Highway 35 
in Middletown, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the 
``Candace White Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Candace White Post Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
May 27, 2015 

 

Mr. Jon Sheedy 

3894 Acorn Hill Dr. 

Canandaigua, NY 14424 

Dear Mr. Sheedy: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 15, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1018), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Exhibit






Exhibit 10-b
To:
Viking Asset Purchaser No. 7 IC (the “Purchaser”) 
Citicorp Trustee Company Limited (the “Programme Trustee”) 

17 January 2017
Dear Sirs,
Extension of a receivables purchase agreement between the Purchaser, the Programme Trustee and ourselves as Seller dated 28 June 2011 as amended, (the “Receivables Purchase Agreement”).
We refer to the Receivables Purchase Agreement. We write to record the terms and conditions upon which the parties have agreed to extend the Receivables Purchase Agreement. 
In the definition of Termination Event, sub-clause (a) which appears in Clause 1 of the Receivables Purchase Agreement shall be replaced by “March 31, 2017, is reached”, which, for the avoidance of doubt, means that the Receivables Purchase Agreement will terminate on 31 March 2017.
Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms and conditions contained in this Letter of Agreement by signing and returning the enclosed duplicate.
Yours faithfully,


for and on behalf of 
Meritor HVS AB
/s/ Carl D. Anderson, II        
Carl D. Anderson, II
We accept the terms and conditions set out in the Letter of Agreement of which the foregoing is the duplicate.


/s/ Stephen Langan         
for and on behalf of  
Viking Asset Purchaser No. 7 IC


/s/ David Mares             
for and on behalf of 
Citicorp Trustee Company Limited
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00347-CV

ROSANNA SILVERIO AND ALVIN 

GREEN, Appellants

V.

TRADITIONAL HERITAGE VILLAGE 

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

A/K/A HERITAGE VILLAGE, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 367th District Court

of Denton County (19-1706-367)

August 20, 2020

Opinion by Justice Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part. We reverse that 

portion of the trial court’s judgment that awards attorney’s fees and remand this case 

to the trial court for a determination of a reasonable and necessary attorney’s fee 
award consistent with this opinion. We affirm the remainder of the trial court’s 

judgment.

It is further ordered that each party shall bear their own costs of this appeal, for 

which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
# Comments on: 2022-1854: DiMasi v. HHS
§ 301-53.3 How may I use promotional materials and frequent traveler benefits? Promotional materials and frequent traveler benefits may be used as follows: ( a ) You may use frequent traveler benefits earned on official travel to obtain travel services for a subsequent official travel assignment(s); however, you may also retain such benefits for your personal use, including upgrading to a higher class of service while on official travel.
( b ) If you are offered such benefits as a result of your role as a conference planner or as a planner for other group travel, you may not retain such benefits for your personal use (*see* § 301-53.2 of this chapter). Rather, you may only accept such benefits on behalf of the Federal Government. Such accepted benefits may only be used for official Government business.
[FTR Amdt. 2003-04, 68 FR 27937, May 22, 2003]
Exhibit 32.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
                          REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or
                    RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          (AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


     I, Floyd Warkol, as Chief Executive Officer of KSW, Inc., (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 15, 2006


                                                       /s/ Floyd Warkol
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Floyd Warkol
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
#### § 102-2.100 Must agencies provide GSA with a follow-up analysis of their experience in deviating from the FMR?

Yes, agencies that deviate from the FMR must also write to the relevant GSA program office at the Regulatory Secretariat's address (see § 102-2.90) to describe their experiences in using a deviation.
§ 302-17.43 What local marginal tax rate(s) does my agency use? ( a ) If you incur local tax liability, you provide the applicable marginal tax rate(s) on your “Statement of Income and Tax Filing Status”. Your agency validates the applicable local marginal tax rate(s) and uses it (them) in the CMTR formula.
( b ) If you incur local income tax liability in more than one locality, then your agency should follow the rules described for state income taxes in § 302-17.42 to calculate the local marginal tax rate that will be used in the CMTR formula and to compute your RITA, and you should follow the rules in § 302-17.42 to determine your actions.
( c ) If a locality in which you incur income tax liability publishes its tax rates in terms of a percentage of your Federal or state taxes, then your agency must convert that tax rate to a percentage of your income to use it in computing your CMTR. This is accomplished by multiplying the applicable Federal or state tax rate by the applicable local tax rate. For example, if the state marginal tax rate is 6 percent and the local tax rate is 50 percent of state income tax liability, the local marginal tax rate stated as a percentage of taxable income would be 3 percent.
#### § 174.107 Contents of casualty or accident report form.

Each form for reporting a vessel casualty or accident must contain the information required in § 173.57 of this chapter.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: ARMANDO AVALOS.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00369-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1 

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20120C00978)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### § 301-10.4 How does my agency select the method of transportation to be used?

Your agency must select the method most advantageous to the Government, when cost and other factors are considered. Under 5 U.S.C. 5733, travel must be by the most expeditious means of transportation practicable and commensurate with the nature and purpose of your duties. In addition, your agency must consider energy conservation, total cost to the Government (including costs of per diem, overtime, lost worktime, and actual transportation costs), total distance traveled, number of points visited, and number of travelers.
Winston H. Hickox

Agency Secretary

The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption.

For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Website: http://www.arb.ca.gov.

California Environmental Protection Agency

Printed on Recycled Paper

Air Resources Board

Alan C. Lloyd, Ph.D.

Chairman

1001 I Street • P.O. Box 2815 • Sacramento, California 95812 • www.arb.ca.gov

Gray Davis

Governor

MEMORANDUM

TO: David Potter

Senior Staff Counsel

Office of Administrative Law

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1290

Sacramento, CA 95814-4602

FROM: W. Thomas Jennings

Senior Staff Counsel

DATE: April 30, 2001

SUBJECT: LIGHT- AND MEDIUM-DUTY LEV ALIGNMENT & HDGE RULEMAKING

REGULATORY ACTION NO. 01-0319-02S

 

In response to our telephone conversation on April 27, 2001, I enclose the

following material:

(1) Seven copies of the following replacement pages for the Final Regulation

Order. They reflect the nonsubstantial changes described below to sections

1956.8 and 1961, title 13, California Code of Regulations. Please substitute

them for the corresponding pages in the Final Regulation Order we submitted

on March 19, 2001.

(a)Page 4: In the fourth line of section 1956.8(d), "as lasted" is corrected to

"as last".

(b) Page 7: Section 1961(a)(12) is shown, with a correction of the internal

lettering from lower case to upper case.

(c) Pages 8-11: Repagination due to showing section 1961(a)(12); in

addition, section 1961(b)(1)(C) is identified on page 10 as having no

changes.

(2) Seven copies of the following replacement pages of the California Exhaust

Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model

Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles, appended to

the Final Regulation Order we submitted on March 19. 2001.
David Potter

April 30, 2001

Page 2

(a) Page E-3, Table 1.1.1: in the row "MDVs 10,001-14,000 lbs. ALVW –

120,000 mile – ULEV," the NMOG g/mi value is changed from "0.197" to

"0.197 0.257" to correctly reflect the standard in the corresponding table in

section 1960.1(h)(2), title 13, CCR.

(b) Page H-3: In section H.1.4.6, "tune label" is corrected to "tune-up label".
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Celulosa Arauco y Constitución S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2016 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

Date: April 28, 2017



/s/ Matías DomeykoName: Matías DomeykoTitle: Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 28, 2017



/s/ Robinson TajmuchName: Robinson TajmuchTitle: Senior Vice-President Comptroller
NO.  07-06-0002-CR

					        07-06-0003-CR

					        07-06-0004-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JANUARY 30, 2006

	______________________________

	DAVID LONGORIA, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2004-407301; 2004-407304; 2004-407306;

	HONORABLE BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant David Longoria seeks to appeal judgment in three cases for the offense of Manufacture/Deliver Controlled Substance.  We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.  

	On September 2, 2005, appellant made an open plea of guilty, was convicted on each cause, and the trial court set appellant’s sentences. 

	On September 29, 2005, appellant filed a Motion for New Trial and Motion in Arrest of Judgment.  Appellant then filed Notice of Appeal on December 30, 2005.  Appellant filed a Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal on January 19, 2006.  The trial court has certified that appellant has the right to appeal.

	Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on or before December 1, 2005.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a).  The time for filing a notice of appeal may be extended for 15 days under certain circumstances.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.  For the time to file a notice of appeal to be extended, both a notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time, which complies with Rule 10.5(b), must be filed within 15 days of the deadline for the notice of appeal.  Id; Olivio v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).  Appellant’s notice of appeal and motion for extension of time were not filed within this 15-day period and are, therefore, untimely.  

	In a criminal case, appeal is perfected by timely filing a sufficient notice of appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b), 26.2.  A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction.  Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998); Olivio, 918 S.W.2d at 522. 

	Appellant’s failure to timely file notice of appeal prevents this court from having jurisdiction over the appeals.  Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.1  Tex. R. App. P. 39.8, 40.2, 43.2(f).  

						Mackey K. Hancock

						        Justice  

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                                 CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Floyd Warkol, as Chief Executive Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  March 31, 2003


                                   /s/ Floyd Warkol
                                   -----------------------------------
                                   Floyd Warkol
                                   Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Annual Report of TELIPHONE CORP.(the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Metrakos, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: December 28, 2006


                 /s/ George Metrakos
                 -------------------
                 George Metrakos,
                 Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Section 302Certification

 

I, Kenneth J. Galaznik, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q/A of American Science and Engineering, Inc.; 

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

 

a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: February 15, 2005 |
|-------------------------|

 
| /s/ Kenneth J. Galaznik                |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Kenneth J. Galaznik                    |
| Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |

 

----
Exhibit 14.2

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.



|                                  |  |                         |  |                    |  |                        |  |                
|--------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------
|Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts |  | Opening Balance         |  | Charged to Expense |  | Charged Against Income |  | Closing Balance
|                                  |  | (in thousands of U.S.$)
|Deferred tax valuation allowance  |  |                         |  |                    |  |                        |  |                
|December 31, 2003                 |  | 25,038                  |  |                   |  | 18,748                 |  | 6,290          
|                                  |  |                         |  |                   
|December 31, 2002                 |  | 43,070                  |  | 12,258             |  | 30,290                 |  | 25,038         
|                                  |  |                         |  |                   
|December 31, 2001                 |  | 54,468                  |  |                   |  | 11,398                 |  | 43,070
§ 105-68.805 What notice does the debarring official give me if I am proposed for debarment? After consideration of the causes in § 105-68.800 of this subpart, if the debarring official proposes to debar you, the official sends you a Notice of Proposed Debarment, pursuant to § 105-68.615, advising you— ( a ) That the debarring official is considering debarring you;
( b ) Of the reasons for proposing to debar you in terms sufficient to put you on notice of the conduct or transactions upon which the proposed debarment is based;
( c ) Of the cause(s) under § 105-68.800 upon which the debarring official relied for proposing your debarment;
( d ) Of the applicable provisions of this subpart, subpart F of this part, and any other GSA procedures governing debarment; and
( e ) Of the governmentwide effect of a debarment from procurement and nonprocurement programs and activities.
#### Steven Lee ANDERSON v. STATE

CR-14-0136

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

01/30/2015

Affirmed