alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 102-3.150 How are advisory committee meetings announced to the public? ( a ) A notice in the Federal Register must be published at least 15 calendar days prior to an advisory committee meeting, which includes: ( 1 ) The name of the advisory committee (or subcommittee, if applicable);
( 2 ) The time, date, physical place (and/or instructions to connect electronically), and purpose of the meeting;
( 3 ) Whether meeting registration is required;
( 4 ) A summary of the agenda, and/or topics to be discussed and instructions on how to access meeting materials;
( 5 ) A statement whether all or part of the meeting is open to the public or closed; if the meeting is closed in whole or in part, state the reasons why, citing the specific exemption(s) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c);
( 6 ) Instructions for submitting written comments, and oral comments if permitted;
( 7 ) Instructions on how to submit a request for physical meeting or electronic meeting accommodations consistent with the requirements of E.O. 13166 and relevant sections of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 794; and
( 8 ) The name and telephone number (or email) of the DFO or other responsible agency official, or agency electronic mailbox for the committee, to contact for additional information concerning the meeting.
( b ) In exceptional circumstances, such as a national emergency or natural disaster, the agency or an independent Presidential advisory committee may give less than 15 calendar days notice, provided that the reasons for doing so are included in the advisory committee meeting notice published in the Federal Register.
( c ) In addition to the Federal Register, and consistent with standard agency practice, agencies should announce meetings through additional notification methods, such as websites and social media, considering the most appropriate methods to reach committee stakeholders, and with as much advance notice as possible.
§ 109-38.5106 Application of motor vehicle use goals. ( a ) At least annually, the motor equipment fleet manager will review motor vehicle utilization statistics and all motor vehicles failing to meet the applicable DOE utilization standard or local use objective must be identified.
( b ) Prompt action must be initiated to: ( 1 ) Reassign the underutilized motor vehicles;
( 2 ) Dispose of the underutilized motor vehicles; or
( 3 ) Obtain a special justification from users documenting their continued requirement for the motor vehicle and any proposed actions to improve utilization. Any requirement for underutilized motor vehicles which the motor equipment fleet manager proposes to continue in its assignment, must be submitted in writing to the Organizational Motor Equipment Fleet Manager for approval.
( c ) Both Department-wide standards and local use objectives should be applied in such a manner that their application does not stimulate motor vehicle use for the purpose of meeting the objective. The ultimate standard against which motor vehicle use must be measured is that the minimum number of motor vehicles will be retained to satisfy program requirements.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Bureau of Transportation Statistics 

          - [Docket No. BTS-99-6375] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Transportation Statistics, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Class I and Class II motor carriers of property and household goods are required to file annual and quarterly reports with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). As provided by statute, carriers may request that their reports be withheld from public release. On October 25, 1999, BTS invited comments on several requests submitted by carriers (64 FR 57512). BTS has issued its decisions and these are available through the DOT Dockets Management System. Please follow the instructions listed below. 

# ADDRESSES:

You can read BTS's decision on the exemption requests using the DOT Dockets Management System. This is located at the Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Room PL-401, Washington, DC 20590, and is open from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays. Internet users can access the Dockets Management System at http://dms.dot.gov. Please follow the instructions online for more information and help. The exemption requests and public comments on them are also available through this system. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Mednick, K-1, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590; (202) 366-8871; fax: (202) 366-3640; e-mail: david.mednick@bts.gov. 

Ashish Sen,

Director.

[FR Doc. 00-15846 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-FE-P
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 722

To amend the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 to establish

a presumption of eligibility for disability benefits in the case of certain

coal miners who filed claims under part C of such Act between July

1, 1973, and April 1, 1980.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. KANJORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act

of 1969 to establish a presumption of eligibility for disability benefits in the case of certain coal miners who

filed claims under part C of such Act between July

1, 1973, and April 1, 1980.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 722 IH

1 SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR DISABIL2 ITY BENEFITS UNDER THE BLACK LUNG BEN3 EFITS PROGRAM.

4 Section 422 of the Federal Coal Mine Health and

5 Safety Act of 1969 (30 U.S.C. 932) is amended by adding

6 after subsection (l) the following new subsection:

7 ‘‘(m)(1) Notwithstanding any other law, rule, or reg8 ulation, in the case of any claim filed under this part be9 tween July 1, 1973, and April 1, 1980, with respect to

10 a miner who has engaged in coal mining employment for

11 at least 10 years, such miner shall be presumed to be to12 tally disabled due to pneumoconiosis, or to have been to13 tally disabled due to pneumoconiosis, or the death of such

14 miner shall be presumed to be due to pneumoconiosis,

15 arising out of that employment, if any of the following

16 medical requirements is met:

17 ‘‘(A) A single positive chest roentgenogram (X18 ray), biopsy, or autopsy indicates the existence of

19 pneumoconiosis.

20 ‘‘(B) A single set of positive ventiliatory studies

21 indicates the presence of a chronic respiratory or

22 pulmonary disease.

23 ‘‘(C) A single set of positive blood gas studies

24 indicates the presence of an impairment in the

25 transfer of oxygen from the lungs to the blood.
3

HR 722 IH

1 ‘‘(D) Other medical evidence, including the doc2 umented opinion of a physician exercising reasonable

3 medical judgment, indicates the presence of totally

4 disabling respiratory impairment.

5 ‘‘(2) The presentation of evidence which meets any

6 of the requirements under subparagraphs (A) through (D)

7 of paragraph (1) shall be sufficient to invoke the presump8 tion under such paragraph.

9 ‘‘(3) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to

10 require proof of any such medical requirement by a pre11 ponderance of the evidence or by any higher evidentiary

12 standard.’’.

Æ
1845-0052 – Affected Public – Private Institutions 11/26/2014

This request is for approval of an extension of OMB information collection number 1845-0052 the 

reporting requirements currently in the Student Assistance General Provisions, 34 CFR 668, Subpart I. 

This subpart governs the Immigration-Status Confirmation, as authorized by section 484(g) of the Higher 

Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C. 1091). The regulations can be reviewed at 34 CFR 

668, Subpart I.

There is an increase in burden hours due to an increase in the number of respondents who need to present 

documentation to the school to be included with the G-845 form to complete the confirmation of 

eligibility to receive Title IV assistance. There has not been any change to the regulatory language 

requiring this activity.

# of Respondents # of Responses X Hours/ = Burden

Response Hours

Not-for-profit institution:

1,811 25,848 .17 hours = 4,394

(10 min.)
#### § 105-68.975 Notice.

*Notice* means a written communication served in person, sent by certified mail or its equivalent, or sent electronically by e-mail or facsimile. (See § 105-68. 615.)
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION OF
PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, Thomas W. Horton, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of AT&T Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004
          (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AT&T Corp.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 4, 2004

| |  | /s/   Thomas W. Horton
        Thomas W. Horton
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 10-1354.

#### Collins *v.*Louisiana.

Ct. App. La., 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 21, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

130260 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PAMELA MACOR, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Gary Macor, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130260 COA: 264076 Genesee CC: 04-080340-NH ROBERT KOWALSKI, M.D., Defendant-Appellant,

and

McLAREN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-Appellee,

and

MARTA Z. BONKOWSKI, M.D., Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 23, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered an d, it appearing to this Court that the case of Washington v Sinai Hosp ital of Greater Detroit (Docket No. 130641) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolv e an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

l0718 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 21, 2006

Clerk
## 2013

- 2014 FSA Application Commenters Listing

The following is a listing of the individuals or organizations th at provided comments on the 2013

-2014 FSA Application. Comments
were collected August 15, 2012 thru October 15, 2012 . A summary of the comments received is provided separately.

1) Mila Dwelley Tappan, Finance Authority of Maine 2) Amy M. Duca , Fox Valley Technical College 3) Steve McGrath, Educational Talent Search/TRIO 4) La netta Phillips, Tuscumbia Educational Talent Search 5) Margaret Zitzer, Marquette University 6) Donna Schafer, Community Technical School 7) Susan Garibaldi, University of Southern California 8) Robyn Rhyner, Jefferson Community College 9) Robert Foultz, West Chester University 10) Robert Foultz, West Chester University 11) Robyn Tanger, Northcentral Technical College 12) Deborah Porter, Georgia Southern University 13) Jana Haile, Boston University 14) Stuart Perry, College of Saint Benedict 15) Donna Freeman, The Richard Stockton College of NJ 16) Caryn Rose, Anne Arundel Community College 17) Patricia Hurley, Glendale Community College 18) Donna Freeman, The Richard Stockton College of NJ 19) Karen McCarthy, on behalf of NASFAA 20) Julie Leeper, on behalf of NASSGAP 21) Margaret Young, Mohave Community College 22) Mol ly Jefferds, Anne Arundel Community College 23) Vicki Shipley, on behalf of NCHELP
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 38596)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 13, 2000, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Interoperability Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., New York, NY; and Visa International Services Association, Foster City, CA. The nature and objectives of the venture are to promote and accelerate the acceptance and use of the File Structure Specification of a Travel and Entertainment Multi-Application Smart Card as a worldwide open standard in the smart card industry and otherwise to promote and accelerate the creation of global interoperability for multiple application smart cards.                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-15606  Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Confidential Business Informatio n received from Ford Motor Company on January 8, 2015 (Updated January 26, 2015)

.

For more information , please contact Margaret Sheppard by phone at 202

- 343

- 9163 or by email at sheppard.margaret @epa.gov.
§ 109-50.203 Eligible equipment. ( a ) Education-related and research equipment will include, but is not limited to the following FSCGs: FSCG and Description 34 Metalworking Machinery 36 Special Industry Machinery 41 Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Air Circulating Equipment 52 Measuring Tools 60 Fiber Optics Materials, Components, Assemblies and Accessories 61 Electric Wire, and Power and Distribution Equipment 66 Instruments and Laboratory Equipment 67 Photographic Equipment 70 General Purpose Automatic Data Processing Equipment (Including Firmware), Software, Supplies and Support Equipment 74 Office Machines, Text Processing Systems and Visible Record Equipment
( b ) Other related equipment may be provided if deemed appropriate and approved by the Director, Office of Laboratory Policy and Infrastructure Management.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-1093

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM149AD

CMM 27-41-10, R3 --- 10/2/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Argued and submitted January 18,

reversed and remanded June 21, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Vernal M. Davidson, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Baker Custom Haying, *Petitioners, v.*Vernal M. DAVIDSON, *Respondent.*

(93-02875, 93-02863; CA A84055)

897 P2d 1199

Michael O. Whitty, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Kimberley Chaput argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Kevin Keaney and Pozzi Wilson Atchison.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Marcy Lerch v. Wilmington Trust NA Successor Trustee for 

the Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investor Trust Series 2006-HE5

Appellate case number: 01-15-00505-CV

Trial court case number: 15-CCV-054652

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Fort Bend County

The panel has voted to deny appellant’s motion for reconsideration, construed as a 

motion for rehearing, of the order, signed on June 11, 2015.

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale

Date: August 4, 2015
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of  Alcan Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge,  that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  March 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: 10  May 2005                                                                 

                                                                                             /s/ Travis Engen

Travis    Engen
 President and  Chief Executive Officer
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 24, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants ; Docket Id: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Region 7 , EPA SUBJECT: September 25 , 2014 , Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for

Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** Karl Brooks and Am y Bhesania of EPA gave a summary presentation on September 25, 2014, for a Weather and Climate Class at the University of Missouri, Kansas City . The majority of the presentation centered on highlighting the four major building blocks in the Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants . The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014 . **ATTENDEES** EPA Region 7: Karl Brooks Amy Bhesania Other Attendees included students enrolled in the Weather and Climate Class - attendee list not available.
Rockingham

No. 78-272

#### Sybil V. Yancey v. Henry B. Yancey

March 30, 1979

*John J. Wholey,*of Portsmouth, for the plaintiff, waived brief and oral argument.

*Fisher, Parsons, Moran & Temple,*of Dover *(Robert E. Fisher*orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

Defendant in this divorce matter filed a petition for modification of a support order and for enforcement of visitation and communication *198rights with his children. He filed a motion to discover correspondence from the plaintiff which is in the files of the New Hampshire Probation Department and which the department has refused to disclose. Even though there was no objection by either the plaintiff or the probation department, his motion was denied without a hearing by *King,*J., who transferred his exceptions.

Although a motion upon which the opposing party does not request a hearing may be acted on under Superior Court Rule 58, RSA 491: App. R. 58 (Cum. Supp. 1978), the motion cannot be denied without giving the movant a chance to be heard.

 This State takes a liberal view of discovery. Absent some privilege and subject to control to prevent harassment, full discovery is favored even against third parties and State agencies. *See Scontsas v. Citizens Insurance Co.,*109 N.H. 386, 253 A.2d 831 (1969); *Marceau v. Orange Realty Inc.,*97 N.H. 497, 92 A.2d 656 (1952); *Lefebvre v. Somersworth Shoe Co.,*93 N.H. 354, 41 A.2d 924 (1945). There is no suggestion that any letters from plaintiff in the files of the probation department are privileged or that any harassment is involved. The letters may contain information relevant to the issues of visitation rights and the financial condition of the plaintiff. No reason has been advanced why the motion should not have been granted and we perceive none.

Defendant’s exception is sustained and his motion is granted.

*Exception sustained; motion for discovery granted; compliance within twenty days of the date hereof.*

Douglas, J., did not sit.
#### § 109-1.101-50 DOE-PMR System.

The DOE-PMR system described in this subpart is established to provide uniform personal property management policies, standards, and practices within the Department.
#### § 105-53.120 Address and telephone numbers.

The Office of the Administrator; Office of Civil Rights; Office of Citizen Services and Innovative Technologies; Office of the Chief Information Officer; Office of Emergency Response and Recovery; Office of the Chief Financial Officer; Chief Administrative Services Officer; Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs; Office of Small Business Utilization; Office of General Counsel; Office of the Chief People Officer; Office of Communications and Marketing; Office of Governmentwide Policy; Public Buildings Service and the Office of Inspector General are located at 18th and F Streets NW., Washington, DC 20405. The Federal Acquisition Service is located at 2200 Crystal Drive Room 1000, Arlington, VA 22202-3713; however, the mailing address is Washington, DC 20406. The telephone number for the above addresses is 202-472-1082. The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) is located at 1800 M Street NW., 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20036; however, the CBCA mailing address is 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405. The CBCA telephone number is 202-606-8800. The addresses of the eleven regional offices are provided in § 105-53.151.

[78 FR 29246, May 20, 2013]