alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 105-54.102 Definitions. ( a ) The term “advisory committee” means any committee, board, commission, council, conference, panel, task force, or other similar group or any subcommittee thereof that is: ( 1 ) Established by statute,
( 2 ) Established or utilized by the President, or
( 3 ) Established or utilized by any agency official to obtain advice or recommendations that are within the scope of his/her responsibilies. The term “advisory committee” excludes the Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations and any committees composed wholly of full-time officers or employees of the Federal Government.
( b ) “Presidential advisory committee” means any committee that advises the President. It may be established by the President or by the Congress, or may be used by the President to obtain advice or recommendations.
( c ) “Independent Presidential advisory committee” means any Presidential advisory committee not assigned by the President, or the President's delegate, or by the Congress in law, to an agency for administrative and other support and for which the Administrator of General Services may provide administrative and other support on a reimbursable basis.
( d ) “Committee member” means an individual who serves by appointment on a committee and has the full right and obligation to participate in the activities of the committee, including voting on committee recommendations.
( e ) “Staff member” means any individual who serves in a support capacity to an advisory committee.
( f ) “Secretariat” means the General Services Administration's Committee Management Secretariat. Established pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, it is responsible for all matters relating to advisory committees, and carries out the Administrator's responsibilities under the Act and Executive Order 12024.
( g ) “Utilized” (or used), as stated in the definition of “advisory committee” above, refers to a situation in which a GSA official adopts a committee or other group composed in whole or in part of other than full-time Federal officers or employees with an established existence outside GSA as a preferred source from which to obtain advice or recommendations on a specific issue or policy within the scope of his/her responsibilities in the same manner as that official would obtain advice or recommendations from an established advisory committee.
#### § 105-50.304 Services provided through revolving funds.

Where the service furnished is of the type which GSA is now billing through revolving funds, reimbursement shall be obtained from State and local governments on the same basis; i.e., the same pricing method, billing forms, and billing support shall be used.
#### § 105-68.360 What happens if I fail to disclose the information required under § 105-68.355?

If we later determine that you failed to tell the person at the higher tier that you were excluded or disqualified at the time you entered into the covered transaction with that person, we may pursue any available remedies, including suspension and debarment.
#### § 102-42.140 How is a sale of a foreign gift or decoration to an employee conducted?

Foreign gifts and decorations must be offered first through negotiated sales to the employee who has indicated an interest in purchasing the item. The sale price must be the commercially appraised value of the gift. Sales must be conducted and documented in accordance with part 102-38 of this subchapter B.

[68 FR 56496, Sept. 4, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 28778, May 18, 2006]
Case 1:22-cv-23920-JEM   Document 27   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-23920-JEM   Document 27   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2023   Page 2 of 2
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012- Directorate Identifier: 2012-NE- -AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

PW100 PT1 blade 

inspection or 

replacement at 25% 

failure rate

1.5 $ 127.50 $0 $ 127.50 540 $68,850.00

Replacement parts 

cost

$ 0.00 $6,000 $6,000.00 135 $810,000.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $878,850

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 540 engines 

affected, estimate 25% fall-out rate or 135. 

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
§ 3001.105 Post-employment restrictions. All former employees of the Postal Regulatory Commission (Commission) are subject to the following restrictions on appearance and practice before the Commission on behalf of any participant, including the United States Postal Service (Postal Service): ( a ) No former employee of the Commission may practice or act as an attorney, expert witness, or representative in connection with any proceeding or matter before the Commission that the former employee has handled, advised, or participated in the consideration of while in the service of the Commission.
( b ) No former employee of the Commission may within one year after the individual's employment has ceased, practice before or act as an attorney, expert witness, or representative in connection with any proceeding or matter before the Commission that was under the official responsibility of such individual, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202(b), while in the service of the Commission.
[82 FR 50321, Oct. 31, 2017. Redesignated and amended at 85 FR 9615, 9616, Feb. 19, 2020]
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Howlett, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 'SS' 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


                                       /s/ John P. Howlett.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       August 14, 2003





<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sam Bhatt, Vice
President of Finance and Operations of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 'SS' 1350, as adopted pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


                                       /s/ Sam Bhatt
                                       Vice President of Finance
                                       August 14, 2003
§ 105-53.132 Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. ( a ) *Creation and authority.* The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, headed by the Chairman, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, was established on January 6, 2007, pursuant to section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, Pub. L. 109-163, 119 Stat. 3391.
( b ) *Functions.* The CBCA hears, considers, and decides contract disputes between Government contractors and Executive agencies (other than the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Department of the Army, the U.S. Department of the Navy, the U.S. Department of the Air Force, the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the U.S. Postal Service, the Postal Rate Commission, and the Tennessee Valley Authority) under the provisions of the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. 7101-7109, and regulations and rules issued thereunder. The Board also conducts other proceedings as required or permitted under statutes or regulations. Such other proceedings include the resolution of disputes involving grants and contracts under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 25 U.S.C. 450, *et seq.;* the resolution of disputes between insurance companies and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Risk Management Agency (RMA) involving actions of the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) pursuant to the Federal Crop Insurance Act, 7 U.S.C. 1501, *et seq.;* requests by carriers or freight forwarders to review actions taken by the Audit Division of the U.S. General Services Administration's Office of Transportation and Property Management pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3726(i)(1); claims by Federal civilian employees against the United States for reimbursement of expenses incurred while on official temporary duty travel, and expenses incurred in connection with relocation to a new duty station pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3702; and requests of agency disbursing or certifying officials, or agency heads, on questions involving payment of travel or relocation expenses pursuant to section 204 of the U.S. General Accounting Office Act of 1996, Public Law 104-316.
( c ) *Regulations.* Regulations pertaining to CBCA programs are published in 48 CFR Chapter 61. Information on availability of the regulations is provided in § 105-53.116.
[78 FR 29246, May 20, 2013]
§ 105-74.200 What must I do to comply with this part? There are two general requirements if you are a recipient other than an individual. ( a ) First, you must make a good faith effort, on a continuing basis, to maintain a drug-free workplace. You must agree to do so as a condition for receiving any award covered by this part. The specific measures that you must take in this regard are described in more detail in subsequent sections of this subpart. Briefly, those measures are to— ( 1 ) Publish a drug-free workplace statement and establish a drug-free awareness program for your employees (see §§ 105-74.205 through 105-74.220); and
( 2 ) Take actions concerning employees who are convicted of violating drug statutes in the workplace (see § 105-74.225).
( b ) Second, you must identify all known workplaces under your Federal awards (see § 105-74.230).
#### § 102-79.15 What objectives must an Executive agency strive to meet in providing assignment and utilization of space services?

Executive agencies must provide assignment and utilization services that will maximize the value of Federal real property resources and improve the productivity of the workers housed therein.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Stephanie A. Casey, of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendant Lawrence Gene David, and requests that all papers served 

in this case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Dated: April 6, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Stephanie Casey

Stephanie A. Casey

Florida Bar No. 97483

Email: scasey@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Lawrence Gene David

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 117 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 2306** 

MICHAEL L. PACK , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. MARTIN O’MALLEY, Governor , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o f Maryland , at Baltimore
. William D. Quarles, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cv - 02912

- WDQ )

Submitted : F ebruary 18, 2010 Decided: February 23, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael L. Pack, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael L. Pack appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Pack v. O’Malley , No. 1:09

- cv - 02912

- WDQ (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presente d in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
# Comments on: 2018-2370: Turner v. Wilkie
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MARVIN L. HAGGINS, a/k/a )

MARVIN LAVAN HAGGINS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2349

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 27, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, Judge.

Marvin L. Haggins, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
..**~**



### SERVED: May 12, 2014

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF JETT PRO LINE MAINTENANCE FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 1077
AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER We do not anticipate setting this matter for hearing priorto July 1, 2014. Accordingly, paragraphs #2 and #3 ofthe Procedural Order are amended as follows: WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule: 1. On orbefore July 7, 2014, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to productionrequests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannotresolve a discovery dispute they shall submitthe dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 2. The parties shall be preparedto present this case at a hearing onorafter July 7, 2014, subjectto the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List 1 ·._·,._)•I

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

John Craig Weller, Respondent's Counsel Aerlex Law Group 2800 281 h Street, Suite 200 SantaMonica, CA 90405 TEL: 530-205-9884 FAX: 530-205-9371 EMAIL: cweller@aerlex.com SamNugud, President Jett Pro Line Maintenance, Respondent 8517 Earhart Road, Suite 210 Oakland, CA 94621 TEL: NOTPROVIDED FAX: NOT PROVIDED Sam Nugud, President Jett Pro Line Maintenance, Respondent P.O. Box 3190 Ontario, CA 91761 TEL: 909-980-0552 FAX: 909-980-0699 ONE COPY

Autumn Killingham, Complainant's Counsel General Attorney, Enforcement Division, Office ofthe ChiefCounsel, AGC-600 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 TEL: 202-267-7728 FAX: 202-267-5769 FDMS No. FAA-2013-1077 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E: (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536



### 3
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15749]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Nutrition 
Study Section, June 19, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to June 20, 2000, 4 p.m. Delta 
Chelsea Hotel, 33 Gerrard Street, West Toronto, Ontario, ON 000000 
which was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2000, 65 FR 
36156-36159.
    The starting time of the meeting has been changed to 8 a.m. The 
meeting dates and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to 
the public.

    Dated: June 14, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-15749 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
COLLINS ASSET GROUP, LLC , Appellant,

v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC, FRANK BOSIER, ET AL. , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1253

_____________________________/ Opinion filed September 9, 2016. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Charles A. Francis , Judge

. Mark E. Pollack of Pollack & Rosen, P.A., Coral Gables , for Appellant. No appea rance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. Appellant Collins Asset Group , LLC appeals an order denying its Motion to Substitute Party Plaintiff and Motion for Entry of Deficiency Judgment

. This case is similar to Collins Asset Group, LLC v. Prop. Asset Mgmt., Inc

. , 1D15

- 1254, 2016 WL 3702926, at *1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), involving a challenge to the trial
court’s Order on Motion to Substitute Party Plaintiff and Motion for Entry of Deficiency Judgment . In that case, Appellant Collins Asset Group filed a Motion2 to Su bstitute Party Plaintiff and Motion for Entry of Deficiency Judgment , but the trial court summarily denied the motion with an order that contained the following language: “Plaintiff’s motion is hereby DENIED on the basis of lack of standing in that Certifi cate of Title was issued to Property Management, Inc., and no document or verified pleading has been filed to indicate transfer of judgment.” This Court

revers ed and remand ed the case for further proceedings, finding that the trial court erred in two ways. First, the motion was facially sufficient. Second, the trial court erroneously applied the pleading requirements of rule 1.115(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. That is, the motion before the court was not a complaint for foreclosure that would requir e the note to be attached or for it be verified. The motion here contai ns the same facts and assertions , the only differences are the defendant/appellee, the relevant dates, and the dollar amounts. So the order
here suffers from one of the same problems: it denied a facially sufficient motion. Accordingly, the order is revers ed and the case is remand ed for further proceedings

. REVERSED and REMANDED

. RAY , MAKAR , and OSTERHAUS , J J

. , CONCUR.