alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 105-50.106 GSA response to requests. ( a ) Direct response to each request shall be made by the Head of the applicable Service or Staff Office or Regional Administrator. He shall outline the service to be provided and the fee or reimbursement required. Any special conditions concerning time and priority, etc., shall be stated. Written acceptance by the authorized State or local governmental entity shall constitute a binding agreement.
( b ) Heads of Services and Staff Offices and Regional Administrators shall maintain complete records and controls of services provided on a calendar year basis to facilitate accurate, annual reporting, as required in § 105-50.401.
§ 105-54.304 Cost guidelines. ( a ) The reporting and estimating of the costs of advisory committees include direct obligations for the following items: ( 1 ) Pay compensation of committee members; consultants to the committee; all permanent, temporary, or part-time (GM, GS, WB, or other) positions which are a part of or support the committee; and all overtime related to committee functions (Compensation should reflect actual or estimated Federal person-years or parts thereof devoted to a committee's activities. It includes the compensation of Federal employees assigned to committees, on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis, from agencies or departments other than to which the committee reports.);
( 2 ) Personnel benefits associated with the above compensation (13 percent of basic payroll);
( 3 ) Travel costs (including per diem) of committee members; consultants; and all permanent, temporary, or part-time positions which are a part of or support the committee;
( 4 ) Transportation of things, communications, and printing and reproduction;
( 5 ) Rent for additional space acquired for committee use;
( 6 ) Other services required by the committee, including data processing services, management studies and evaluations, contractual services, and reimbursable services; and
( 7 ) Supplies, materials, and equipment acquired for committee use.
( b ) The reporting and estimating of the cost of advisory committees does not include indirect or overhead costs; e.g., the costs of the committee management system (committee management officers, etc.).
§ 102-75.195 If the transferor agency is a wholly owned Government corporation, what amount must the transferee agency pay? As may be agreed upon by GSA and the corporation, the transferee agency must pay an amount equal to— ( a ) The estimated fair market value of the property; or
( b ) The corporation's book value of the property.
EXHIBIT 99.1



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:


               SUNBEAM CORPORATION ANNOUNCES CHANGES IN DIRECTORS;
                             DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL - August 7, 1996 - Sunbeam Corporation (NYSE: SOC) announced
today that its Board has elected Russell A. Kersh and Howard G. Kristol to serve
on the Company's Board of Directors. Mr. Kersh was recently appointed as the
Company's Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration. Mr. Kristol, a
partner of the New York law firm Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol,
served as a Director of Scott Paper Company with Al Dunlap, Sunbeam's newly
appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Kersh and Mr. Kristol join
current board members Al Dunlap, Charles Thayer, Peter Langerman, Shimon Topor
and Richard Ravitch.
         Sunbeam also announced that its Board has unanimously approved a
significant change in the compensation of its outside directors. All outside
directors will now be compensated exclusively in shares of the Company's stock.
This stock-only compensation replaces prior director payment arrangements,
including annual retainers, meeting fees and stock option and restricted stock
awards. Under this new plan each outside director will receive 1,500 shares of
the Company's stock annually. Further, each outside director has committed to
purchase additional shares of Sunbeam stock with his own funds.
         Mr. Dunlap was a pioneer in the concept of stock-only compensation for
company directors. "This is an important step in aligning our directors with our
shareholders." said Mr. Dunlap. "The executives and directors of Sunbeam are now
shareholders in the Company and will have an increased commitment to improving
shareholder value."
         The Company's new management team has already aligned itself with the
shareholders. Mr. Dunlap invested $3 million of his own money in the Company's
stock when he joined Sunbeam. Subsequently, all of his new executives have also
made significant investments of their own funds.
         Charles Elson, professor of law at Stetson University and an expert on
board compensation, commented, "This is a move that will be applauded by the
shareholders of Sunbeam and the American investment community in general."
<PAGE>
         Sunbeam Corporation is a leading consumer products company that
designs, manufactures and markets, nationally and internationally, a diverse
portfolio of outdoor and household brand name products. The Company's Sunbeam(R)
and Oster(R) brands have been household names for generations, both domestically
and abroad, and the Company is a market leader in many of its product
categories.


                                ****************



Contact:  Pete Judice                       John DeSimone
          Burson-Marsteller, New York       Manager, Investor Relations
          (212) 614 - 4506                  Sunbeam Corporation
                                            (954)767-2100
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Uniq Branch Office Mexico, S.A. de 

C.V., and Jacobo Helfon Daniel, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

Steel Media Group, LLC, and others, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 22-23876-Civ-Scola

Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report & Recommendations

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan 

Goodman for a ruling on all pre-trial, nondispositive matters and for a report 

and recommendation on any dispositive matters. On March 7, 2024, Judge 

Goodman issued a report, recommending that the Court grant in part and deny 

in part the Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment. (Report of Magistrate, ECF 

No. 171.) Neither the Plaintiffs nor the relevant Defendants have filed 

objections to the report, and the time to do so has passed.

The Court has considered Judge Goodman’s report, the record, and the 

relevant legal authorities. The Court finds Judge Goodman’s report and 

recommendation cogent and compelling. The Court affirms and adopts Judge 

Goodman’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 171). The Court therefore 

grants in part and denies in part the Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment 

against Defendants Steel Media Group, LLC and Luis Fernando Rodriguez 

Mejia (ECF No. 131). The Court grants the motion with respect to the issue of 

liability, but denies the motion with respect to damages, attorney’s fees, and 

costs. However, the denial is without prejudice so that the Plaintiffs may file a 

renewed motion providing supporting documentation for damages, attorney’s 

fees, and costs.

Done and ordered, at Miami, Florida, on April 8, 2024.

_______________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:22-cv-23876-RNS Document 182 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2024 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allis-Chalmers Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Munawar
H. Hidayatallah, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company,
certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


By  /s/ Munawar H. Hidayatallah
    ---------------------------
    Munawar H. Hidayatallah


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 102-75.440 Who must disposal agencies notify that surplus property is available for historic monument use?

Disposal agencies must notify State and area wide clearinghouses and eligible public agencies that property that may be conveyed for use as a historic monument has been determined to be surplus. A copy of the landholding agency's Report of Excess Real Property (Standard Form 118) with accompanying schedules must be transmitted with the copy of each notice that is sent to the appropriate regional or field offices of the National Park Service (NPS) of the Department of the Interior (DOI).
§ 301-10.201 For what purposes may I use a Government vehicle other than a Government aircraft? Only for official purposes which include transportation: ( a ) Between places of official business;
( b ) Between such places and places of temporary lodging when public transportation is unavailable or its use is impractical;
( c ) Between either paragraph (a) or (b) of this section and restaurants, drug stores, barber shops, places of worship, cleaning establishments, and similar places necessary for the sustenance, comfort, or health of the employee to foster the continued efficient performance of Government business; or
( d ) As otherwise authorized by your agency under 31 U.S.C. 1344.
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 31, 2008 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|--------------------- | --------------------
|                      | John P. Manning     
|                      | Director, President 
|                      | (Principal Executive
|                      | Officer), BCTC IV   
|                      | Assignor Corp.
#### § 109-45.5101 Authority.

The policies and procedures contained in this subpart are issued pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, former 40 U.S.C. *et seq*., as amended. Title IV of the Act entitled “Foreign Excess Property” provides that, except where commitments exist under previous agreements, all excess personal property located in foreign areas shall be disposed of by the owning agency, and directs that the head of the agency conform to the foreign policy of the United States in making such disposals in accordance 41 CFR 102-36.
[Civ. No. 12045.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

November 9, 1938.]

#### MARY FORD, Appellant, v. STANLEY CARKEEK et al., Respondents.

*56No appearance for Appellant.

Syril S. Tipton for Respondents.

THE COURT. 

This case comes before us on motion to dismiss for failure of the appellant to file a transcript of the record within the time allowed by law and for failure to file a brief. The motion is accompanied by a clerk’s certificate.

The motion is good; appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7420

TRON MANUEL LITTLEJOHN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CECILIA R. REYNOLDS, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(1:09-cv-01718-TLW)

Submitted: April 26, 2011 Decided: May 23, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tron Manuel Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Samuel Creighton Waters, 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tron Manuel Littlejohn appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition.∗

AFFIRMED

 On 

appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the 

informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Littlejohn’s 

informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district 

court’s dismissal of twenty-one of his claims, Littlejohn has 

forfeited appellate review of those claims. With regard to 

Littlejohn’s claim that counsel rendered ineffective assistance 

by failing to object to an in-court identification (the only 

claim properly before the court), Littlejohn fails to show any 

error in the district court’s denial of relief. Accordingly, we 

affirm that claim for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Littlejohn v. Reynolds, No. 1:09-cv-01718-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 

2010). We deny Littlejohn’s motion for a transcript at 

government expense and dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

 ∗ We note that the district court granted certificate of 

appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006).
EXHIBIT 32











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMREP Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  September 10, 2010





/s/ Peter M. Pizza


Peter M. Pizza*


Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer





/s/ James Wall


James Wall*





/s/ Michael P. Duloc


Michael P. Duloc*











___________________


*The Registrant is a holding company which does substantially all of its business through two indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries (and their subsidiaries).  Those indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries are AMREP Southwest Inc. (“ASW”) and Kable Media Services, Inc. (“Kable”).  James Wall is the principal executive officer of ASW, and Michael P. Duloc is the principal executive officer of Kable.  The Registrant has no chief executive officer.  Its executive officers include James Wall, Senior Vice President and Peter M. Pizza, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Michael P. Duloc, who may be deemed an executive officer by reason of his position with Kable.
§ 109-28.000-50 Policy. DOE offices and designated contractors shall: ( a ) Establish storage space and warehousing services for the receipt, storage, issue, safekeeping and protection of Government property;
( b ) Provide storage space and warehousing services in the most efficient manner consistent with program requirements; and
( c ) Operate warehouses in accordance with generally accepted industrial management practices and principles.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 748 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 748

To amend the Act that established the Keweenaw National Historical Park 
   to require the Secretary of the Interior to consider nominees of 
various local interests in appointing members of the Keweenaw National 
                 Historical Parks Advisory Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1999

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Act that established the Keweenaw National Historical Park 
   to require the Secretary of the Interior to consider nominees of 
various local interests in appointing members of the Keweenaw National 
                 Historical Parks Advisory Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPOINTMENTS TO KEWEENAW NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARKS ADVISORY 
              COMMISSION.

    (a) Consideration of State and Local Nominees.--Section 9(c)(1) of 
the Act entitled ``An Act to establish the Keweenaw National Historical 
Park, and for other purposes'' (Public Law 102-543; 16 U.S.C. 410yy-
8(c)(1)) is amended by striking ``from nominees'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``after consideration of nominees''.
    (b) Explanation of Failure To Appoint State or Local Nominee.--
Section 9(c)(1) of such Act (16 U.S.C. 410yy-8(c)(1)) is further 
amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``If the Secretary determines to appoint a member under 
        subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) who is not a nominee 
        referred to in that subparagraph, the Secretary shall submit a 
        written explanation for the determination to the Congress by 
        not later than 30 days before the effective date of the 
        appointment.''.
                                 <all>
```
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 613

To amend title 9, United States Code, to allow employees the right to

accept or reject the use of arbitration to resolve an employment controversy.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 1999

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 9, United States Code, to allow employees

the right to accept or reject the use of arbitration to

resolve an employment controversy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ARBITRATION CHOICE.

4 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 1 of chapter 1 of title 9,

5 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘nation, but

6 nothing herein’’ and all that follows through the end and

7 inserting ‘‘nation.’’.

8 (b) ARBITRATION CHOICE.—Chapter 1 of title 9,

9 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

10 following:
2

•HR 613 IH

1 ‘‘§ 17. Resolution of controversy

2 ‘‘(a) Notwithstanding an employment contract that

3 provides for the use of arbitration to resolve a controversy

4 arising out of or relating to the employment relationship,

5 arbitration may be used to settle such a dispute only if—

6 ‘‘(1) the employer or employee submits a writ7 ten request after the dispute arises to the other

8 party to use arbitration; and

9 ‘‘(2) the other party consents in writing not

10 later than 60 days after the receipt of the request

11 to use arbitration.

12 ‘‘(b) An employer subject to this Act may not require

13 an employee to arbitrate a dispute as a condition of em14 ployment.’’.

15 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

16 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to

17 contracts entered into, amended, altered, modified, re18 newed, or extended after the date of the enactment of this

19 Act.

Æ