alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 109-45.310 Antitrust laws.

DOE offices shall submit to the Office of Management any request for a proposed sale of a patent, process, technique, or invention, regardless of cost; or of surplus personal property with a fair market value of $3,000,000 or more.
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Dinesh R.Desai, certify that:

1.          Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emtec, Inc.;

2.          Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; 

3.          Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

          a)          designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b)          evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

          c)          disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

          a)          allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information;  and

          b)          anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: July 17,2006
Exhibit 32.1

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Vanguard Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/S/    ERIC G.
WINTEMUTE                 
|Eric G. Wintemute
Chief Executive Officer



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    DAVID T.
JOHNSON                                                
|David T. Johnson
Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer

August 5, 2010

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to American Vanguard Corporation and will be retained by American Vanguard Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       9,150,979
<SECURITIES>                                84,007,816
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,229,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,080,798
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           149,271,630
<PP&E>                                       4,152,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             249,892,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      206,793,198
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       810,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               249,892,612
<SALES>                                     16,149,830
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,432,266
<CGS>                                        5,965,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,967,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,640,036
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                50,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,967,683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,692,922
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,967,683
<DISCONTINUED>                               7,627,825
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,692,922
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,934,903
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.09


</TABLE>
#### § 102-117.130 Must I select TSPs who use alternative fuels?

No, but, whenever possible, you are encouraged to select TSPs that use alternative fuel vehicles and equipment, under policy in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 7612) or the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 13212).
§ 105-50.401 Reports submitted to the Congress. ( a ) The Administrator of General Services will furnish annually to the respective Committees on Government Operations of the Senate and the House of Representatives a summary report on the scope of the services provided under Title III of the act and this part.
( b ) Heads of Services and Staff Offices and all Regional Administrators shall furnish the Director of Management Services, OAD, by no later than January 15 of each year, the following information concerning services provided during the preceding calendar year to State and local units of government: ( 1 ) A brief description of the services provided, including any other pertinent data;
( 2 ) The State and/or local unit of government involved; and
( 3 ) The cost of GSA to provide the service, including the amount of reimbursement, if any, made by the benefitting government.
( c ) Reports Control Symbol LAW-27-OA is assigned to this report.
§ 301-52.8 May my agency disallow payment of a claimed item? Yes, if you do not: ( a ) Provide proper itemization of an expense;
( b ) Provide receipt or other documentation required to support your claim; and
( c ) Claim an expense which is not authorized.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITEDSTATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned, the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofAmerican Science & Engineering, Inc. (the “Company”), does herebycertify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1.             the Company’sReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “10-Q”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             the informationcontained in the 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 9, 2010 | /s/ Kenneth J.  Galaznik                                 |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Kenneth J. Galaznik                                           |
|                      | Senior Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to American Science & Engineering, Inc. and will beretained by American Science & Engineering, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
No. 10-11103.

#### Thornburgh *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 105-64.111 What is GSA's policy on directives that may conflict with this part?

These rules take precedence over any GSA directive that may conflict with the requirements stated here. GSA officials will ensure that no such conflict exists in new or existing directives.
§ 105-60.803 Restrictions on charging fees. ( a ) When GSA determines that a requester is an educational institution, noncommercial scientific institution, or representative of the news media, and that the records are not sought for commercial use, GSA shall not charge search fees.
( b ) If GSA fails to comply with the time limits in which to respond to a request for agency records under FOIA, it will not charge search fees, or in the instances of requests from requesters described in paragraph (a) of this section, may not charge duplication fees, except as described in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section. GSA will charge duplication fees in accordance with § 105-60.802(b)(1) through (3) of this subpart. ( 1 ) If GSA has determined that unusual circumstances, as defined by FOIA, apply and the agency provided timely written notice to the requester in accordance with FOIA, a failure to comply with the time limit shall be excused for an additional 10 business days.
( 2 ) If GSA has determined that unusual circumstances, as defined by the FOIA, apply and that more than 5,000 pages are necessary to respond to the request, GSA may charge search fees, or, in the case of requesters described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, may charge duplication fees, if the following steps are taken. GSA shall have provided timely written notice of unusual circumstances to the requester in accordance with FOIA and GSA shall have discussed with the requester via written mail, email, or telephone (or made not less than three good-faith attempts to do so) how the requester could effectively limit the scope of the request in accordance with 5. U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(ii). If this exception is satisfied, the component may charge all applicable fees incurred in the processing of the request.
( 3 ) If a court has determined that exceptional circumstances exist, as defined by FOIA, a failure to comply with the time limits shall be excused for the length of time provided by the court order.
( c ) No search or review fees shall be charged for a half-hour period unless more than half of that period is required for search or review.
( d ) Except for requesters seeking records for a commercial use, GSA shall provide without charge: ( 1 ) The first 100 pages of duplication (or the cost equivalent for other media); and
( 2 ) The first 2 hours of search time.
( e ) No fee shall be charged when the total fee, after deducting the 100 free pages (or its cost equivalent) and the first 2 hours of search, is equal to or less than $49.00.
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, N. Scott Gillis, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AIG SunAmerica LifeAssurance Company, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 12, 2005   /s/ N. SCOTT GILLIS     N. Scott Gillis
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6841

WILLIAM K. COWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-226-HC-5-BO) Submitted: August 10, 2001 Decided: August 30, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William K. Coward, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We recently held in United States v. Angle, Nos. 96-4662, 96-4672, 99-4187, 2001 WL 732124 (4th Cir. June 29, 2001), at *3, that no Apprendi error existed when the sentence for conspiring to commit an offense that involved an unspecified quantity of drugs was under twenty years. Coward received a 100 month sentence, less than the twenty year maximum sentence. Accordingly, he has no Apprendi claim. 2 PER CURIAM: William K. Coward appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. * See Coward v. United States , No. CA-01-226- HC-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: pfarina4@gmail.com [ mailto:pfarina4@gmail.com ] On Behalf Of Phil Farina

Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:05 AM

To: Jordan, Ronald; Flanders, Phillip

Cc: Mark J. Kropilak Esq.

Subject: Liberty Hydro Patent

As you are aware Liberty Hydro has received a patent for our ZVI Blue technology for

the management of certain contaminants in waste waters. As per your request I have

attached a copy of the patent.

If you have any further questions or need any additional information please feel free to

contact me directly.

Phil Farina

Sales Executive

Liberty Hydro

Phil.farina@libertyhydro.com

419

- 346

- 88 48
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 118 (Monday, June 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37979-37980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15329]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments

[[Page 37980]]

must be received not later than July 3, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President), 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Richard N. Abrams, Northfield, Illinois; to acquire additional 
voting shares of Surety Capital Corporation, Fort Worth, Texas, and 
thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Surety Bank, 
National Association, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 13, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-15329 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 959.17 Evidence. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in these rules, the rules of evidence governing civil proceedings in matters not involving trial by jury in the District courts of the United States shall govern. However, such rules may be relaxed to the extent that the presiding officer deems proper to insure a fair hearing. The presiding officer shall exclude irrelevant, immaterial or repetitious evidence.
( b ) Testimony shall be under oath or affirmation and witnesses shall be subject to cross-examination.
( c ) Agreed statements of fact may be received into evidence.
( d ) Official notice or knowledge may be taken of the types of matters of which judicial notice or knowledge may be taken.
( e ) The written statement of a competent witness may be received into evidence provided that such statement is relevant to the issues, that the witness shall testify under oath at the hearing that the statement is in all respects true, and, in the case of expert witnesses, that the statement correctly states his or her opinion or knowledge concerning the matters in question.
( f ) A party who objects to the admission of evidence shall make a brief statement of the grounds for the objection. Formal exceptions to the rulings of the presiding officer are unnecessary.
[39 FR 33213, Sept. 16, 1974, as amended at 63 FR 66052, Dec. 1, 1998]
## Draft Proposal CB-44

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Repair Definition (CB-44)

Objective: Revise the definition of repair to be specific as to intent and meaning and can be readily

applied in compliance verification.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise the definition of REPAIR in Section C202 as follows:

REPAIR. The reconstruction or renewal of any part of an existing building to the condition it was when

last permitted and approved.

Reason: The current definition does not specify a point in time that is needed to effectively apply the

code to repairs. There needs to be a clearer distinction between an alteration, addition, renovation, and

repair. The proposed language makes it clear by stating that the reconstruction or renewal is to the

condition it was in when last permitted (e.g., the way it was/has been before it needed the repair).

Anything else would be a change from what it was to something else and therefore be an addition,

alteration, or renovation.

Cost Impact: There is a cost impact associated with this proposed change to the degree that repairs are

not clearly covered in the current code, and as a result repairs that should be subject to the energy code

are not now being required to meet the energy code OR in some cases repairs that should not be

required to meet the code may currently be required to meet the code.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statements Nos. 333-82774 and 333-32488 on Form S-3 andRegistration Statement Nos. 333-51256 and 333-68097 on Form S-8 of our report,dated June 4, 2004, except for Note 1 as to which the date is April 12, 2005,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of AML Communications, Inc.for the year ended March 31, 2004.

 
| /s/ SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN,  LLP |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN, LLP      |

 

Los Angeles, California

April 12, 2005

 

----