alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION AS OF
AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             466
<SECURITIES>                                       449
<RECEIVABLES>                                      647
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                         94
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,761
<PP&E>                                           2,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,328
<BONDS>                                            251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,307
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,109)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (2,854)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,013
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.15)
        

</TABLE>
§ 105-74.400 What are my responsibilities as a(n) GSA awarding official? As a(n) GSA awarding official, you must obtain each recipient's agreement, as a condition of the award, to comply with the requirements in— ( a ) Subpart B of this part, if the recipient is not an individual; or
( b ) Subpart C of this part, if the recipient is an individual.
#### § 102-34.30 How do we request a deviation from the provisions of this part?

Refer to §§ 102-2.60 through 102-2.110 of this chapter for information on how to obtain a deviation from this part.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                  SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT

      This First Amendment to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement
made as of February 1, 1998 (the "Agreement") between American General
Corporation, a Texas corporation (the "Company") and James S. D'Agostino, Jr.
(the "Executive") is made on April 30, 1998.

      1.  Section 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of
the following new paragraph at the end thereof:

            "Unless the Executive shall have notified the Company in writing
      no later than July 1, 1998 (and prior to any termination of his employ-
      ment) of his election that this paragraph shall be null and void and of
      no effect, then, notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
      Section 2.1, if payment of a lump sum amount equal to the actuarial
      equivalent of a Normal Retirement Benefit is to be made pursuant to
      Section 2.6 hereof, the annual amount of the Normal Retirement Benefit
      shall equal (X) minus (Y), where (X) is calculated as set forth above,
      but the amount of (Y) equals only the Social Security Benefit plus the
      Qualified Plan Benefit (and not the Restoration Plan Benefit).  The
      resulting increase in such lump sum amount shall be paid in lieu of any
      Restoration Plan Benefit under the circumstances described in Section
      2.6 hereof and the Executive hereby waives his right to any Restoration
      Plan Benefit under (and only under) such circumstances."

      2.  Section 2.6 of the Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of
the following sentence at the end thereof:

      "Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 2.6, if termi-
      nation of the Executive's employment occurs after a Change in Control
      (or is deemed to have occurred after a Change in Control pursuant to the
      Executive's Employment Agreement) and if payment of a lump sum amount
      equal to the actuarial equivalent of a Normal Retirement Benefit is to
      be made pursuant to this Section 2.6 after the Executive shall have
      attained age 57, the Normal Retirement Benefit calculated pursuant to
      this Section 2.6 shall not be less than the Normal Retirement Benefit
      which the Executive would have accrued if the Executive had continued to
      be employed by the Company until his Normal Retirement Date."

      3.  As amended by this First Amendment, the Agreement is hereby specifi-
cally ratified and reaffirmed.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amend-
ment on April 30, 1998.
<PAGE>









                              AMERICAN GENERAL CORPORATION


                              By       /S/ ROBERT M. DEVLIN           
                                  Name:    Robert M. Devlin
                                  Title:   Chief Executive Officer


                                    /S/ JAMES S. D'AGOSTINO, JR.    
                                    James S. D'Agostino, Jr.






































                                       2
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 of Impax Laboratories, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 March 12,  2009
    By:

/s/ Arthur A. Koch, Jr.Arthur A. Koch, Jr.Senior Vice President, Finance, and 
Chief Financial Officer
§ 102-75.1000 How is the decision made to abandon, destroy, or donate property? No property shall be abandoned, destroyed, or donated by a Federal agency under § 102-75.990, unless a duly authorized official of that agency determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The property has no commercial value; or
( b ) The estimated cost of its continued care and handling exceeds the estimated proceeds from its sale.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Michael J. DeeName:

Michael J. DeeTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ William C. Wiedel, Jr.Name:

William C. Wiedel, Jr.Title:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: September 26, 2008
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-13-00490-CV

_________________

IN RE JOHN S. MORGAN AND JOHN S. MORGAN, P.C., D/B/A 

MORGAN LAW FIRM

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In a petition for writ of mandamus, John S. Morgan and John S. Morgan, 

P.C., d/b/a Morgan Law Firm, seek to compel the trial court to vacate its order of 

August 30, 2013, which denied Relators’ motion to disqualify counsel for the real 

parties in interest. The record submitted with the petition consists of documents 

concerning other cases, correspondence discussing settlement negotiations, the

motion and supplemental motion Relators filed with the trial court, and the trial 

court’s order. The mandamus record does not contain the parties’ live pleadings or 

the response filed by the real parties in interest, Harris, Duesler & Hatfield, L.L.P., 
2

James Harris, Jr., and Collin Cobb. Relators have not presented a mandamus 

record that includes a copy of all documents material to their claim, which asserts

that the real parties in interest must be disqualified. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a); 

see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k). After reviewing the mandamus petition and 

record, we conclude that Relators have not established the trial court clearly abused 

its discretion. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PETITION DENIED. 

PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered November 14, 2013

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit (32) Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with this quarterly report of American Greetings Corporation on Form 10-Q as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), each of
the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of American Greetings Corporation. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American
Greetings Corporation and will be retained by American Greetings Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. January 7, 2005 /s/ Zev WeissZev WeissChief Executive Officer
 /s/ Robert P. RyderRobert P. RyderSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 39
SI()-l(K)3()9-()20 

r ( ^ Rochester International Airport 

-^•^::=C_> ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, USA 

7600 Helgerson Drive Southwes t • Rochester, M l\l 55902 

(507) 282-2328 • Fax (507) 282-2346 

February 24,2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docicet DOT-OST-2010-0034 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express (my/your) support for the application for antitrust immunity 

and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed 

ailiarice between these two airlines is vital for the oneworld alliance to compete effectively with the Star 

and SkyTeam alliances. This increased alliance competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the 

Department's Open Skies policy- first by solidifying U.S. -Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a 

foundation for further liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, (I/we) encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this application 

as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver highly competitive 

air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will have a positive impact on air travel by 

offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers 

continue to benefit from the competition afforded by three competitive air alliances. 

(I/we) urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely, 

Steven W, Leqve 

Airport Manager. 

SWL/nc
#### § 109-27.5104 Practices and procedures.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>         5
  <LEGEND>
  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
  statements of operations for the three months and six months ended June
  30, 2000 and 1999 (unaudited) and the balance sheets dated June 30, 2000
  and December 31, 1999 (unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by
  reference to such financial statements.
  </LEGEND>
  <MULTIPLIER>      1

  <S>                         <C>        <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-2000
  <PERIOD-START>                          Jan-01-2000
  <PERIOD-END>                            Jun-30-2000
  <CASH>                                       46,646
  <SECURITIES>                                    -0-
  <RECEIVABLES>                                   -0-
  <ALLOWANCES>                                    -0-
  <INVENTORY>                                     -0-
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                             46,646
  <PP&E>                                          -0-
  <DEPRECIATION>                                  -0-
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                               76,182
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           -0-
  <BONDS>                                         -0-
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           -0-
  <PREFERRED>                                     -0-
  <COMMON>                                    314,080
  <OTHER-SE>                                 <237,898>
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 76,182
  <SALES>                                         -0-
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                             31,613
  <CGS>                                           -0-
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                   -0-
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                             56,888
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                -0-
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              -0-
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                 -0-
  <INCOME-TAX>                                    -0-
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                             -0-
  <DISCONTINUED>                              <25,275>
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                 -0-
  <CHANGES>                                       -0-
  <NET-INCOME>                                <25,275>
  <EPS-BASIC>                                  0.00
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                   -0-


</TABLE>
§ 102-37.465 May a SASP modify or release any of the terms and conditions of donation? You may alter or grant releases from State-imposed restrictions, provided your State plan of operation sets forth the standards by which such actions will be taken. You may not grant releases from, or amendments or corrections to: ( a ) The terms and conditions you are required by the Property Act to impose on the use of passenger motor vehicles and any item of property having a unit acquisition cost of $5,000 or more.
( b ) Any special handling condition or use limitation imposed by GSA, except with the prior written approval of GSA.
( c ) The statutory requirement that usable property be returned by the donee to the SASP if the property has not been placed in use for the purposes for which it was donated within 1 year of donation or ceases to be used by the donee for those purposes within 1 year of being placed in use, except that: ( 1 ) You may grant authority to the donee to cannibalize property items subject to this requirement when you determine that such action will result in increased use of the property and that the proposed action meets the standards prescribed in your plan of operation.
( 2 ) You may, with the written concurrence of GSA, grant donees: ( i ) A time extension to place property into use if the delay in putting the property into use was beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the donee.
( ii ) Authority to trade in one donated item for one like item having similar use potential.
### Geohydrologic units of the coastal lowlands aquifer system, south-central United States

By: J. S. Weiss

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1416C

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 14**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 15**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 16**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geohydrologic units of the coastal lowlands aquifer system, south-central United States(1990)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.