EPA ICR No. 1715.13; OMB Control No. 2070-0155

ATTACHMENT 10

Copy of Consultations Message Sent by EPA to Potential Respondents
Date: December 10, 2010

From: Christine Koester

USEPA HQ/OPPT/NPCD 

To: [Addressees]

Subject: Request for assistance; renewal of "TSCA Sections 402 and 404 Training and 

Certification, Accreditation and Standards for Lead Based Paint Activities and 

Renovation, Repair and Painting" ICR 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) seeks your comments on the regulation set forth in 40 

CFR 745, Subparts E, L, and Q.

Sections 402(a) and 402(c)(3) of TSCA require EPA to develop and administer a training and certification 

program as well as work practice standards for persons who perform lead-based paint activities and/or 

renovations. The current regulations in 40 CFR part 745, subpart E, cover work practice standards, 

recordkeeping and reporting requirements, individual and firm certification, and enforcement for 

renovations done in target housing or child-occupied facilities. The current regulations in 40 CFR part 

745, subpart L, cover inspections, lead hazard screens, risk assessments, and abatement activities (referred 

to as “lead based paint activities”) done in target housing and child-occupied facilities. The current 

regulations in 40 CFR part 745, subpart Q, establish the requirements that State or Tribal programs must 

meet for authorization to administer the standards, regulations, or other requirements established under 

TSCA Section 402. 

Because the regulation involves the potential collection of information from a large number of 

individuals, EPA is required to submit an Information Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for approval, and to renew the ICR every three years. EPA is currently 

in the process of renewing the ICR for the above-described regulation. A draft copy of the ICR renewal is 

attached hereto, and will also be published in the Federal Register sometime in the near future.

The requirements under this regulation directly impact the members of your organization. As such, EPA 

requests that you complete the attached questionnaire as thoroughly as possible to represent your 

organization's viewpoint on what can be done to change or improve the process. The information you 

provide will have an impact on government efficiency. 

If you have any comments in response to the attached questions, or with respect to any other part of the 

information collection, please respond by return e-mail by February 10, 2011. EPA will consider those 

responses, as well as any public comment received in response to the Federal Register Notice identified 

above, in preparing a final document for OMB review. Your timely response will be greatly appreciated.

 

Sincerely,

Christine J. Koester

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

Lead, Heavy Metals, and Inorganics Branch

202-566-1468
EPA solicits your input on the following questions:

1. Are the data EPA seeks under this ICR available from any public source, or already collected by 

another EPA office or by another agency? If so, where can the data be found?

2. Is it clear what is required for data submission? If not, are there any suggestions for clarifying 

instructions?

a) Do firms and individuals understand that you must retain records for three years?

b) Do training providers understand that you must retain records for as long as the individual is 

certified for a period of three and a half years?

3. Currently, abatement and evaluation firms may apply online via CDX (Central Data Exchange). EPA 

will not share information provided via CDX with third parties.

a) If you are an abatement or evaluation firm, are you interested in using or are you currently 

using CDX to apply?

b) If you are a renovation, repair, and painting firm, an individual lead-based paint professional, 

or a training provider, would you be interested in using CDX to apply for certification?

4. For electronic submission, how should EPA handle signature requirements – Private Key 

Infrastructure, PINS and passwords, signed paper cover sheet?

5. Do you agree with EPA's estimated burden and costs (the ICR addresses only the costs associated with 

paperwork)? Are the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) labor rates accurate? If you have any reason to 

consider the BLS labor rates as used by EPA inaccurate or inappropriate, explain your rationale.

6. Do you have any other comments concerning this Information Collection Request?