Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules 64353 

organizations. An agency may not 

conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 

required to respond to, a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Drug traffic control, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

For the reasons set out above, 21 CFR 

part 1308 is proposed to be amended to 

read as follows: 

PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF 

CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES 

■ 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR 

part 1308 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), 

unless otherwise noted. 

■ 2. In § 1308.12, amend the 

introductory text of paragraph (b)(1) by 

adding the word ‘‘naloxegol,’’ between 

‘‘nalmefene,’’ and ‘‘naloxone,’’ to read 

as follows: 

§ 1308.12 Schedule II. 

(a) * * * 

(b) * * * 

(1) Opium and opiate, and any salt, 

compound, derivative, or preparation of 

opium or opiate excluding 

apomorphine, thebaine-derived 

butorphanol, dextrorphan, nalbuphine, 

nalmefene, naloxegol, naloxone, and 

naltrexone, and their respective salts, 

but including the following: 

* * * * * 

Dated: October 23, 2014. 

Thomas M. Harrigan, 

Deputy Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25685 Filed 10–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0696; FRL–9918–58– 

Region 9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Ventura County 

Air Pollution Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision submitted by California for the 

Ventura County Air Pollution Control 

District (VCAPCD or ‘‘the District’’) 

portion of the California SIP. The 

submitted SIP revision contains the 

District’s demonstration regarding 

Reasonably Available Control 

Technology (RACT) requirements for 

the 2008 8-hour ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). We are proposing to approve 

the submitted SIP revision under the 

Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA 

or the Act). We are taking comments on 

this proposal and plan to follow with a 

final action. 

DATES: Any comments must arrive by 

November 28, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2014–0696, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California. While all documents in the 

docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What document did the State submit? 

B. Are there other versions of document? 

C. What is the purpose of the RACT SIP 

submission? 

II. EPA’s Evaluation and Proposed Action 

A. How is EPA evaluating the RACT SIP 

submission? 

B. Does the RACT SIP submission meet the 

evaluation criteria? 

C. EPA’s Recommendation To Strengthen 

the RACT SIP 

D. Proposed Action and Public Comment 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What document did the State submit? 

Table 1 lists the document addressed 

by this proposal with the date that it 

was adopted by the local air agency and 

submitted by the California Air 

Resources Board. 

TABLE 1—SUBMITTED DOCUMENT

Local agency Document Adopted Submitted 

VCAPCD ................... 2014 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) Revision (‘‘2014 RACT SIP’’).

6/10/14 7/18/14 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
64354 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

On September 18 2014, EPA 

determined that the submittal for 

VCAPCD’s 2014 RACT SIP met the 

completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51 

Appendix V, which must be met before 

formal EPA review. 

B. Are there other versions of this 

document? 

While there is no previous version of 

VCAPCD’s 2014 RACT SIP, we 

approved VCAPCD’s 2006 RACT SIP 

analysis on April 21, 2009 (74 FR 

18148) for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS, and VCAPCD’s 2009 RACT SIP 

Revision on May 15, 2014 (79 FR 27761) 

for several newly issued Control 

Techniques Guidelines (CTG) 

documents. 

C. What is the purpose of the RACT SIP 

submission? 

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 

and nitrogen oxides (NOX) help produce 

ground-level ozone and smog, which 

harm human health and the 

environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA 

requires States to submit enforceable 

regulations that control VOC and NOX

emissions. Sections 182(b)(2) and (f) 

require that SIPs for ozone 

nonattainment areas classified as 

moderate or above require 

implementation of RACT for any source 

covered by a CTG document and any 

other major stationary source of VOCs or 

NOX. The VCAPCD is subject to this 

requirement as it is designated and 

classified as a serious ozone 

nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. 40 CFR 81.305; 77 FR 

3008 (May 21, 2012) (final rule 

designating and classifying Ventura 

County APCD as serious nonattainment 

for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS). 

Therefore, VCAPCD must, at a 

minimum, adopt RACT-level controls 

for all sources covered by a CTG 

document and for all major non-CTG 

stationary sources of VOCs or NOX. Any 

stationary source that emits or has a 

potential to emit at least 50 tons per 

year (tpy) of VOCs or NOX is a major 

stationary source in a serious ozone 

nonattainment area. CAA section 182(c), 

(f). 

Section III.D. of the preamble to EPA’s 

proposed rule to implement the 2008 

NAAQS (78 FR 34178, June 6, 2013) 

states in part that ‘‘RACT SIPs must 

contain adopted RACT regulations, 

certifications where appropriate that 

existing provisions are RACT, and/or 

negative declarations that there are no 

sources in the nonattainment area 

covered by a specific CTG source 

category.’’ The preamble further states 

that ‘‘States must also submit 

appropriate supporting information for 

their RACT submission as described in 

the Phase 2 Rule. See 70 FR 71651.’’ The 

submitted document is VCAPCD’s 

demonstration and certification that its 

rules fulfill RACT for the 2008 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS and that the District has 

adopted negative declarations where it 

has no sources covered by a CTG 

document. EPA’s technical support 

document (TSD) has more information 

about the District’s submission and 

EPA’s evaluation thereof. 

II. EPA’s Evaluation and Proposed 

Action 

A. How is EPA evaluating the RACT SIP 

submission? 

Rules and guidance documents that 

we use to evaluate CAA section 182 

RACT SIPs include the following: 

1. ‘‘Final Rule to Implement the 8-Hour 

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard—Phase 2’’ (70 FR71612; November 

29, 2005). 

2. ‘‘Implementation of the 2008 National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: 

State Implementation Plan Requirements’’— 

Proposed Rule (78 FR 34178; June 6, 2013). 

3. ‘‘State Implementation Plans, General 

Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of 

the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990’’ (57 

FR 13498; April 16, 1992). 

4. Issues Relating to VOC Regulation 

Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations: 

Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 

1987 Federal Register, May 25, 1988, U.S. 

EPA, Air Quality Management Division, 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

(‘‘The Blue Book’’). 

5. Guidance Document for Correcting 

Common VOC and Other Rule Deficiencies, 

August 21, 2001, U.S. EPA Region IX (the 

‘‘Little Bluebook’’). 

6. ‘‘State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen 

Oxides Supplement to the General Preamble 

for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean 

Air Act Amendments of 1990’’ (57 FR 55620, 

November 25, 1992) (‘‘the NOX

Supplement’’). 

7. Memorandum from William T. Harnett 

to Regional Air Division Directors, (May 18, 

2006), ‘‘RACT Qs & As—Reasonably 

Available Control Technology (RACT) 

Questions and Answers.’’ 

8. RACT SIPs, Letter dated March 9, 2006 

from EPA Region IX (Andrew Steckel) to 

CARB (Kurt Karperos) describing Region IX’s 

understanding of what constitutes a 

minimally acceptable RACT SIP. 

9. EPA’s CTGs http://www.epa.gov/glo/

SIPToolkit/ctgs.html. 

B. Does the RACT SIP submission meet 

the evaluation criteria? 

VCAPCD’s 2014 RACT SIP provides 

the District’s demonstration and 

certification that the applicable SIP for 

the Ventura County APCD satisfies CAA 

section 182 RACT requirements for the 

2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The 

District’s submittal builds on its 2006 

and 2009 RACT SIP certifications that 

its rules meet RACT. However, since, as 

the District points out, many CTGs have 

not been updated for many years, 

VCAPCD compared its rules to similar 

rules in other air districts with a higher 

ozone nonattainment classification. 

VCAPCD also reviewed the cost 

effectiveness of more stringent 

requirements adopted in other air 

districts. 

Where there are no existing sources 

covered by a particular CTG document, 

states may, in lieu of adopting RACT 

requirements for those sources, adopt 

negative declarations certifying that 

there are no such sources in the relevant 

nonattainment area. Table B–2 of 

VCAPCD’s 2014 RACT SIP lists not only 

CTGs, but also other documents relevant 

to establishing RACT at major sources. 

Negative declarations are only required 

for CTG source categories for which the 

District has no sources covered by the 

CTG. A negative declaration is not 

required for non-CTG source categories. 

Table 2 below lists the CTG source 

categories that remain after we excluded 

non-CTG documents from VCAPCD’s 

2014 RACT SIP Table B–2. 

TABLE 2—VCAPCD NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS

CTG source category CTG reference document 

Aerospace ............................................ EPA–453/R–97–004, Aerospace CTG and MACT. 

Automobile and Light-duty Trucks, Surface Coating of.EPA–450/2–77–008, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume 

II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks. 

EPA 453/R–08–006, Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly 

Coatings. 

Cans and Coils, Surface Coating of .... EPA–450/2–77–008, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume 

II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks. 

Flat Wood Paneling, Surface Coating 

of.

EPA–450/2–78–032, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume 

VII: Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling. 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules 64355 

TABLE 2—VCAPCD NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS—Continued 

CTG source category CTG reference document 

EPA–453/R–06–004, Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings. 

Flexible Packaging Printing .................. EPA–453/R–06–003, Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing. 

Large Appliances, Surface Coating of EPA–450/2–77–034, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume 

V: Surface Coating of Large Appliances. 

EPA 453/R–07–004, Control Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings. 

Magnet Wire, Surface Coating for Insulation of.EPA–450/2–77–033, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume 

IV: Surface Coating of Insulation of Magnet Wire. 

Metal Furniture Coatings ...................... EPA–450/2–77–032, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume 

III: Surface Coating of Metal Furniture. 

EPA 453/R–07–005, Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings. 

Paper, Film and Foil Coatings ............. EPA 453/R–07–003, Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings. 

Petroleum Refineries ............................ EPA–450/2–77–025, Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater Separators, and 

Process Unit Turnarounds. 

EPA–450/2–78–036, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment. 

Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing ............ EPA 453/R–08–004, Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials. 

Industrial Adhesives ............................. EPA 453/R–08–005, Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives. 

Pharmaceutical Products ..................... EPA–450/2–78–029, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products. 

Pneumatic Rubber Tires, Manufacture 

of.

EPA–450/2–78–030, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber 

Tires. 

Polyester Resin .................................... EPA–450/3–83–008, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins. 

EPA–450/3–83–006, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical 

Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment. 

Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing.EPA–450/3–84–015, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in 

Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry. 

EPA–450/4–91–031, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and 

Distillation Operations in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry. 

Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners .......... EPA–450/3–82–009, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry 

Cleaners. 

VCAPCD provided its 2014 RACT SIP 

for public comment prior to the public 

hearing for adoption. No written 

comments were received by the District. 

We are proposing to find that 

VCAPCD’s 2014 RACT SIP submission, 

including the above negative 

declarations, adequately demonstrate 

that its rules satisfy RACT for the 2008 

8-hour ozone NAAQS. Our TSD has 

more information on our evaluation. 

C. EPA Recommendations To 

Strengthen the RACT SIP 

We recommend VCAPCD investigate 

Rule 70, Storage and Transfer of 

Gasoline, for potential future emission 

reductions the next time the District 

opens the rule for amendment. We 

discuss this recommendation further in 

our TSD. 

D. Proposed Action and Public 

Comment 

Based on the evaluations discussed 

above and more fully in our TSD, we are 

proposing to conclude that VCAPCD’s 

2014 RACT SIP satisfies CAA section 

182 RACT requirements for the 2008 8- 

hour ozone NAAQS and to fully 

approve this submission into the 

California SIP pursuant to section 

110(k)(3) of the Act. We will accept 

comments from the public on this 

proposal for the next 30 days. Unless we 

receive convincing new information 

during the comment period, we intend 

to publish a final approval action that 

will incorporate this RACT submission 

into the federally enforceable SIP. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this proposed action 

merely proposes to approve State law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by State law. For 

that reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address 

disproportionate human health or 

environmental effects with practical, 

appropriate, and legally permissible 

methods under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed action does 

not have tribal implications as specified 

by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
64356 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: October 9, 2014. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25742 Filed 10–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

48 CFR Parts 515, 538, and 552 

[GSAR Case 2013–G502; Docket 2014–0009; 

Sequence 1] 

RIN 3090–AJ41 

General Services Administration 

Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); 

Federal Supply Schedule Contracting 

(Administrative Changes); Extension 

of Time for Comments 

AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, 

General Services Administration. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: The General Services 

Administration (GSA) issued a proposed 

rule on September 10, 2014, amending 

the General Services Administration 

Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to 

clarify and update the contracting by 

negotiation GSAR section and 

incorporate existing Federal Supply 

Schedule Contracting policies and 

procedures, and corresponding 

provisions and clauses. The comment 

period is being extended to provide 

additional time for interested parties to 

provide comments for GSAR Case 2013– 

G502, Federal Supply Schedule 

Contracting (Administrative Changes), 

to November 21, 2014. 

DATES: For the proposed rule published 

on September 10, 2014 (79 FR 54126), 

submit comments by November 21, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in 

response to GSAR Case 2013–G502 by 

any of the following methods: 

• Regulations.gov: http://

www.regulations.gov. Submit comments 

by searching for ‘‘GSAR Case 2013– 

G502’’. Select the link ‘‘Comment Now’’ 

and follow the instructions provided at 

the ‘‘You are commenting on’’ screen. 

Please include your name, company 

name (if any), and ‘‘GSAR Case 2013– 

G502’’, on your attached document. 

• Fax: 202–501–4067. 

• Mail: U.S. General Services 

Administration, Regulatory Secretariat 

Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., 

2nd Floor, ATTN: Hada Flowers, 

Washington, DC 20405–0001. 

Instructions: Please submit comments 

only and cite GSAR Case 2013–G502 in 

all correspondence related to this case. 

All comments received will be posted 

without change to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal and/or business confidential 

information provided. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Dana Munson, General Services 

Acquisition Policy Division, GSA, 202– 

357–9652 or email Dana.Munson@

gsa.gov, for clarification of content. For 

information pertaining to status or 

publication schedules, contact the 

Regulatory Secretariat at 202–501–4755. 

Please cite GSAR Case 2013–G502. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

GSA published a proposed rule in the 

Federal Register at 79 FR 54126, 

September 10, 2014. The comment 

period is extended to provide additional 

time for interested parties to submit 

comments on the GSAR case until 

November 21, 2014. 

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 515, 

538, and 552 

Government procurement. 

Dated: October 23, 2014. 

Jeffrey A. Koses, 

Senior Procurement Executive, Office of 

Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25702 Filed 10–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–61–P 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS