alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 76699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30161]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8560]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Swaziland

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), as carried forward by the Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Div. F, Pub. L. 113-6), and Department of 
State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it 
is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act and similar provisions of 
law in prior year Acts with respect to Swaziland and I hereby waive 
this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 23, 2013.
William J. Burns,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-30161 Filed 12-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
```
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 852

To require the Department of Agriculture to establish an electronic filing

and retrieval system to enable the public to file all required paperwork

electronically with the Department and to have access to public information on farm programs, quarterly trade, economic, and production reports, and other similar information.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To require the Department of Agriculture to establish an

electronic filing and retrieval system to enable the public

to file all required paperwork electronically with the Department and to have access to public information on

farm programs, quarterly trade, economic, and production reports, and other similar information.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom to E-File

5 Act’’.
2

•HR 852 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELECTRONIC FILING AND RETRIEVAL.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the

3 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture

4 shall establish an electronic filing and retrieval system to

5 enable the public to file all required paperwork electroni6 cally with the Department of Agriculture and to have ac7 cess to public information on farm programs, quarterly

8 trade, economic, and production reports, and other similar

9 information.

10 (b) PROGRESS REPORTS.—Not later than 90 days

11 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall

12 report to Congress the progress made toward implement13 ing subsection (a).

Æ
No. 10-10962.

#### Sutherland *v.*Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 301-75.2 May we pay pre-employment interview travel expenses?

Yes, if you determine it is in the best interest of the Government to do so. However, pre-employment travel expenses may not be authorized to offset or defray other expenses not allowable under this subpart.
### 30631 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 103 / Friday, May 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

information collection burden ‘‘for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding.

The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Television. Federal Communications Commission. Barbara A. Kreisman, Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. Final Rule

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as follows: **PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336, and 339. **§ 73.622 [Amended]** ■ 2. Section 73.622(i), the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments under Rhode Island, is amended by removing channel 51 at Providence and adding channel 50 at Providence. [FR Doc. 2015–13099 Filed 5–28–15; 8:45 am] **BILLING CODE 6712–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES**  **ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND**  **SPACE ADMINISTRATION 48 CFR Part 22**  **Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions**  CFR Correction

■ In Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1, Parts 1 to 51, revised as of October 1, 2014, on page 490, in section 22.403–4, at the end of paragraph (a), remove the phrase ‘‘The Department of Labor regulations include—’’. [FR Doc. 2015–13057 Filed 5–28–15; 8:45 am] **BILLING CODE 1505–01–D**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **48 CFR Part 1501 Acquisition Regulation; OMB**  **Approvals Under the Paperwork Reduction Act**  CFR Correction

■ In Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapters 15 to 28, revised as of October 1, 2014, on page 6, in section 1501.370, in the table, for the first entry, remove ‘‘through’’ and add ‘‘and’’ in its place. [FR Doc. 2015–13058 Filed 5–28–15; 8:45 am] **BILLING CODE 1505–01–D**
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 819 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 819

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To authorize appropriations for the Federal Maritime Commission for 
                      fiscal years 2000 and 2001.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 819

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize appropriations for the Federal Maritime Commission for 
                      fiscal years 2000 and 2001.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Maritime Commission 
Authorization Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FEDERAL MARITIME 
              COMMISSION.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to the Federal Maritime 
Commission--
            (1) for fiscal year 2000, $15,685,000; and
            (2) for fiscal year 2001, $16,312,000.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Legal Services Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

The Finance Committee of the Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors will meet on June 25, 2000. The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. and continue until the Committee concludes its agenda. 

# LOCATION:

Radisson Plaza Hotel Minneapolis, 35 South 7th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402. 

# STATUS OF MEETING:

Open. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

 

1. Approval of agenda. 

2. Review of the Legal Services Corporation's Consolidated Operating Budget, Expenses, and Other Funds available through April 30, 2000. 

3. Review the projected operating expenses for fiscal year 2000 based on operating experience through March 31, 2000 and the required internal budgetary adjustments due to shifting priorities. 

4. Consider and act on the President's recommendations for consolidated operating budget reallocations. 

5. Report on internal budgetary adjustments by the President and Inspector General. 

6. Report on budgetary needs for Fiscal Year 2002. 

7. Consider and act on other business. 

8. Public comment. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:

Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary, at (202) 336-8800. 

# SPECIAL NEEDS:

Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend the meeting may notify Shannon Nicko Adaway, at (202) 336-8800. 

Dated: June 15, 2000.

Victor M. Fortuno, 

Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-15708 Filed 6-16-00; 3:30 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
#### § 102-38.235 What types of payment may we accept as bid deposits?

In addition to the acceptable types of payments in § 102-38.290, you may also accept a deposit bond. A deposit bond may be used in lieu of cash or other acceptable form of deposit when permitted by the offer to sell, such as the Standard Form (SF) 150, Deposit Bond—Individual Invitation, Sale of Government Personal Property, SF 151, Deposit Bond—Annual, Sale of Government Personal Property, and SF 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety. For information on how to obtain these forms, see § 102-2.135 of subchapter A.
#### § 302-12.3 Am I required to participate in homesale counseling?

Yes, you are required to participate in homesale counseling if you are going to use the RSC. The RSC and/or your agency must provide counseling to help you understand the process, select a broker, prepare your home for sale, identify an appropriate selling price, set realistic expectations, etc. This counseling may be in person or via an electronic medium, at your agency's discretion. Your agency should also provide you with relocation information/counseling prior to you making any decisions to relocate.

[FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18343, Apr. 1, 2011]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Zachary Lipshultz of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal, and requests that all papers served in this 

case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Dated: May 8, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Zachary Lipshultz

Zachary Lipshultz

Florida Bar No. 123594

Email: zach@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 180 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 105-71.135 Subawards to debarred and suspended parties.

Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or permit any award (subgrant or contract) at any tier to any party which is debarred or suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension”.
O rder filed September 12 , 2019



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _ ____

No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 051

- CV

__________

JACK LEE BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE JACK LEE BISHOP TRUST, Appellant

V.

J OEL B ISHOP , INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE

JAY D. BISHOP TRUST AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JAY D. BISHOP, DECEASED, ET AL.

, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 266th District Court

Erath County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV32823

O R D E R

Appellant ha s filed in this court a motion to stay

. Appellant indicate s that a

second mediation session would be beneficial and that Appellees are not opposed to

the stay

. The Honorable Judge Jerry Ray has agreed to mediate this case sometime2 during October 2019. We grant the motion to stay and abate the appeal so that the

parties may continue their efforts to settle the controversy

. This appeal is now abated pending mediation, which is to be conducted on or

bef ore October 31, 2019, with Judge Jerry Ray. The parties are instructed to notify

this court of the mediation results within ten days of the completion of mediation. If

mediation fully resolves the issues in this appeal, the parties shall file a joint mot ion

in accordance with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2).

PER CURIAM

September 12 , 2019

Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J.,

Stretcher , J., and Wright, S.C.J. 1

Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value

and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has

determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40312

Summary Calendar

__________________

PATRICK G. HENRY,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

KATHLEEN HAWK, in her official capacity

as Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons;

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; EDWARD F.

REILLY, in his official capacity as Chairman,

U.S. Parole Commission; U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION,

 Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:94-CV-105

- - - - - - - - - -

November 13, 1995

Before WIENER, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Patrick G. Henry appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition concerning the Parole

Commission reopening the determination of Henry's parole date for consideration of new adverse

information. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241; 28 C.F.R. § 2.28(f).

Henry argues that the Commission exceeded its authority to reopen because the

information relied upon by the Commission to reopen was not new adverse information under §

2.28(f). Henry contends that the information was before the Commission, through the PSR, when
No. 95-40312

-2-

the original parole determination was made. The record indicates that the packet of information,

sent by the former state prosecutor and containing details of Henry's state conviction, Henry's

method of preparation for violent acts, and explanation of the items discovered during the federal

investigation, was not before the Commission during the initial determination. Therefore, the

Commission properly reopened the case pursuant to § 2.28(f). See Frassetto v. Perrill, 955 F.2d

176, 178 (2d Cir. 1992).

Henry challenges the Commissioner's determination which effectively denied parole to

him. Although the Commission’s decision must have a factual basis, judicial review of a decision

is limited to whether there is “some evidence” in the record to support the decision, Maddox v

United States Parole Commission, 821 F.2d 997, 999 (5th Cir.1987). A review of this record

indicates that there is “some evidence” to support the Commission’s decision.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 301-50.3 Must I use the ETS or TMS to arrange my travel?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77026, Sept. 20, 2024.

Yes, if you are an employee of an agency as defined in § 301-1.1 of this chapter, you must use the E-Gov Travel Service when your agency makes it available to you. Until then, you must use your agency's existing Travel Management Service (TMS) to make your travel arrangements. If you are an employee of the Department of Defense (DoD) or of the Government of the District of Columbia, you must arrange your travel in accordance with your agency's TMS. Your agency may grant an exception to required use of TMS/ETS under § 301-50.4, § 301-73.102, or § 301-73.104 of this chapter.

[FTR Amdt. 2003-07, 68 FR 71029, Dec. 22, 2003, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2006-04, 71 FR 49375, Aug. 23, 2006; FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61538, Oct. 31, 2007]
Exhibit 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement
of Tanger Factory  Outlet  Centers,  Inc. and  Subsidiary and Tanger  Properties
Limited  Partnership  on Form S-3 (File No.  33-99736-01)  of our reports  dated
January 27,  1997,  except Note 14, which is dated  February  28,  1997,  on our
audits of the financial  statements and financial  statement  schedule of Tanger
Properties  Limited  Partnership  as of December 31, 1996 and 1995,  and for the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which reports are included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                       COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 


Greensboro, North Carolina
March 21, 1997
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 11227 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ROSALINO SALGADO, also known as Chalino, also known as Miyagi, also known as Cocho

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 412

- 6

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Rosalino Salgado has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplemental b rief in accordance

with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Salgado has filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief s and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 21, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-11227 Document: 00513882242 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017No. 15

- 11227

2 as Salgado ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities h erein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-11227 Document: 00513882242 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0478 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-092-AD

Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. (Type certificate currently held by AgustaWestland S.p.A. Model A109C, 

A109E, A109S, A109K2, and AW109SP Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 146 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to failure of the tail rotor and subsequent loss of 

control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter negligible

Labor per Helicopter

(0.25 work-hour x $85/workhour for the inspection)

(0.25 work-hour x $85/workhour for the lock wire 

installation)

(8 work-hour x $85/workhour for the removal & 

reassembly)

$22 per inspection

$22

$680

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $22 per inspection

$22 per lock wire installation

$680 for the removal & reassembly

Total US Fleet Cost $3,212 per inspection cycle

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Robert Grant
2009 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
2-5-2009 

# U SA v . M ang an P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 07-3939

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2009 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du
. Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" U SA v . M a n g a n " (2009). 2009 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1921. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009/1921U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT J anuary23, 2009
N o. 07- 3939 U ni t ed St at es of

A m eri ca vs. Jo hn M ang an, A ppe l l ant ( D i s t ri ct of

N ew Jers ey C ri m i nal N o. 07- cr- 00136)
PRES ENT: M cK E E , S M IT H an d R O T H , C i rcu i t Jud ges. 1. M ot i on byA ppel l ee t o cl ar i fyt he O pi ni on.

A nsw er due 2/ 3/ 09 T ony a W y che 267- 299- 4938 A rgued 12/ 10/ 08 C as e M anage r O R D E R The f or e go i ng M ot i on byA ppel l ee t o C l ar i fyt he O pi ni on i s cons t rued as a M ot i on t o A m end the O p in io n . T h e M o tio n to A m e n d th e O p in io n is G R A N T E D a n d th e O p in io n f iled o n Ja n u a ry8 , 2 0 0 9 is a m e n d e d a s s e t f

o rt h b e lo w . T h e f irst c o m p lete se n ten c e o n p a g e six o f th e o p in io n a c c e ss e d a t w w w . ca3. us cour t s . gov , w hi ch s t at es : “I n ourvi ew , i ti s t he D i s t r i ctC our tt hatm us tdet er m i ne, al bei tw i t h t he a d v ice o r o p in io n o f

a m e n tal h e a lth p ro f

e ss io n a l, th e typ e a n d d u ra tio n o f m e n tal h e a lth t r eatm ent ” i s A M E N D E D byel i m i nat i ng t he cl aus e “a l bei tw i t h t he advi ce oropi ni on of a m ent al heal t h pr ofes s i onal ”. A s amended, t he s ent ence s hal l s t at e: “I n ourvi ew , i ti s t he D i s t r i ctC our tt hatm us tdet er m i ne the type and dur at i on of m ent al heal t h t r eatm ent
. ”

B y th e C o u rt,
/ s /D
. B r ooks Sm i t h C i rcui t Judge D a ted : February5, 2009 t yw / cc: J ames F. G i zzi , E s q. G eor ge S. L eone, E s q. St even G
. Sander s , E s q.