alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 24, 2011

Mr. Jeffery Telander

U.S. EPA Mailroom (D243-02)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

109 T.W. Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

RE: Florim USA

Response to Information Collection Request dated March 12, 2010

Dear Mr. Telander,

Florim USA is providing responses to the Information Collection Request (ICR) dated March 12, 

2010 from Mr. Peter Tsirigotis, Director – Sector Policies and Programs Division. Per the request 

in the ICR, all responses are provided in an electronic format on the enclosed CD-ROM disc.

Enclosure 1 

Florim USA has no emissions data for periods of startup and shutdown.

At this time Florim USA is not providing recommended language for a Startup – Shutdown 

MACT Standard. Presently we are working with other members of the Tile Council of North 

America (TCNA) that have received the EPA March 2010 ICR to develop an industry position. 

This recommendation will be submitted by Mr. Howard Gilberg, council to the TCNA, on our 

behalf and those of the TCNA member companies upon completion.
Enclosure 2

Emission sampling and reporting of results for Florim USA testing was completed by ENTEC 

Services, Inc. Per the ICR, ENTEC submitted the results electronically using the Electronic 

Reporting Tool on June 20, 2011.

Enclosure 3

As per the ICR, an electronic copy of the reports of emissions testing results is provided on the 

enclosed CD-ROM. The folder titled “Emissions Testing Results” contains the following files:

1. “Florim ERT Final Report” provides a copy of the ERT submissions. 

2. “Florim Final Report” provides a PDF copy of the entire ENTEC narrative report

previously filed with your office.

The production and operating data during the time of testing is considered to be Confidential 

Business Information and as such is being submitted per the directions of the ICR to Mr. 

Roberto Morales, Documents Control Officer for the EPA-OAQPS.

Should you have any questions regarding any of this information, please feel free to contact me 

at (931) 553-7595 or at coneal@florimusa.com.

Regards,

Connie O’Neal 

Environmental, Health and Safety Administrator

Enclosure: CD-ROM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dennis Kaufman, Appellant.

[628 NYS2d 152]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), rendered October 12, 1993, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, assault in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, reckless endangerment in the second degree (two counts), and leaving the scene of an incident without reporting as a felony, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the court erred in failing to *sua sponte*conduct a hearing on the issue of the defendant’s right to be present and to meaningfully assist in his own defense because the defendant was continually lapsing into unconsciousness during the trial. We disagree.

The only evidence of the defendant’s incapacity was his counsel’s statements that the defendant dozed off at two *326isolated times during the trial, one of which occurred at 4:45 p.m., shortly before the court adjourned for the day. However, upon limited questioning by the court, it appears that the defendant was in fact fit and that these were isolated incidents. There is no evidence of any request by counsel for any hearings and/or any other remedial measures. Furthermore, the record is devoid of any other indication that the defendant was unable to consult with his attorney or to effectively assist in his own defense. Under these circumstances, we cannot say that the Supreme Court erred in not *sua sponte*conducting a hearing on the physical competency of the defendant to meaningfully assist in his own defense *(see, People v Gensler,*72 NY2d 239, *cert denied*488 US 932; *People v Garcia,*161 AD2d 796; *People v Bisnett,*144 AD2d 567; *People v Stokes,*118 AD2d 670).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Joy, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 661

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to prohibit the commercial operation

of supersonic transport category aircraft that do not comply with stage

3 noise levels if the European Union adopts certain aircraft noise regulations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. OBERSTAR (for himself, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. DUNCAN, and

Mr. HORN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to prohibit the

commercial operation of supersonic transport category

aircraft that do not comply with stage 3 noise levels

if the European Union adopts certain aircraft noise regulations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF SUPERSONIC

4 TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRCRAFT.

5 If the European Union adopts Common Position

6 (EC) No. 66/98 as a final regulation or adopts any similar

7 final regulation, the Secretary of Transportation shall pro-
2

•HR 661 IH

1 hibit, after such date of adoption, the commercial oper2 ation of a civil supersonic transport category aircraft to

3 or from an airport in the United States unless the Sec4 retary finds that the aircraft complies with stage 3 noise

5 levels.

Æ
§ 105-74.605 Award. *Award* means an award of financial assistance by the General Services Administration or other Federal agency directly to a recipient. ( a ) The term award includes: ( 1 ) A Federal grant or cooperative agreement, in the form of money or property in lieu of money.
( 2 ) A block grant or a grant in an entitlement program, whether or not the grant is exempted from coverage under the Governmentwide rule 41 CFR part 105-71 that implements OMB Circular A-102 (for availability, see 5 CFR 1310.3) and specifies uniform administrative requirements.
( b ) The term award does not include: ( 1 ) Technical assistance that provides services instead of money.
( 2 ) Loans.
( 3 ) Loan guarantees.
( 4 ) Interest subsidies.
( 5 ) Insurance.
( 6 ) Direct appropriations.
( 7 ) Veterans' benefits to individuals (i.e., any benefit to veterans, their families, or survivors by virtue of the service of a veteran in the Armed Forces of the United States).
[68 FR 66627, 66628, Nov. 26, 2003]
##### 



Exhibit 15 The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Allied Capital Corporation: Re: Registration Statement
Nos. 333-45525, 333-13584, 333-88681, 333-101849, 333-115979,
333-115980 and 333-115981. Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated May 4, 2005 related to our review of
interim financial information. Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant,
or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act. /s/ KPMG LLP Washington, D.C.
May 4, 2005
360P15

#### State v. Jorge Juarez

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-152)

1. Allowed 10/27/2015

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

*2.*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3.
Exhibit 31.3








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Nathaniel Dalton, certify that:





|   |                                                                                          
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







Date: April 1, 2019





/s/ NATHANIEL DALTONNathaniel DaltonChief Executive Officer
#### § 102-38.95 What is an auction?

An auction is a sale where the bid amounts of different bidders are disclosed as they are submitted, providing bidders the option to increase their bids if they choose. Bids are submitted electronically and/or by those physically present at the sale. Normally, the bidder with the highest bid at the close of each bidding process is awarded the property.
#### § 301-11.22 Am I entitled to per diem or actual expense reimbursement if I am required to return to my official station on a non-workday?

If required by your agency to return to your official station on a non-workday, you will be reimbursed the amount allowable for return travel.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 68

To amend section 20 of the Small Business Act and make technical

corrections in Title III of the Small Business Investment Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. TALENT (for himself, Ms. Vela ́zquez, Mrs. KELLY. Mr. SISISKY, Mr.

MANZULLO, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New

York, Mr. ENGLISH, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. MOORE, and Mr.

DEMINT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To amend section 20 of the Small Business Act and make

technical corrections in Title III of the Small Business

Investment Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Invest5 ment Company Technical Corrections Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. SBIC PROGRAM.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 308(i)(2) of the Small

8 Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 687(i)(2))
2

•HR 68 IH

1 is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘In this

2 paragraph, the term ‘interest’ includes only the maximum

3 mandatory sum, expressed in dollars or as a percentage

4 rate, that is payable with respect to the business loan

5 amount received by the small business concern, and does

6 not include the value, if any, of contingent obligations, in7 cluding warrants, royalty, or conversion rights, granting

8 the small business investment company an ownership in9 terest in the equity or increased future revenue of the

10 small business concern receiving the business loan.’’.

11 (b) FUNDING LEVELS.—Section 20 of the Small

12 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is amended—

13 (1) in subsection (d)(1)(C)(i), by striking

14 ‘‘$800,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,000,000,000’’;

15 and

16 (2) in subsection (e)(1)(C)(i), by striking

17 ‘‘$900,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,200,000,000’’.

18 (c) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.—Title III of the

19 Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 661

20 et seq.) is amended—

21 (1) in section 303(g) (15 U.S.C. 683(g)), by

22 striking paragraph (13);

23 (2) in section 308 (15 U.S.C. 687) by adding

24 at the end the following:
3

•HR 68 IH

1 ‘‘(j) For the purposes of sections 304 and 305, in

2 any case in which an incorporated or unincorporated busi3 ness is not required by law to pay Federal income taxes

4 at the enterprise level, but is required to pass income

5 through to its shareholders or partners, an eligible small

6 business or smaller enterprise may be determined by com7 puting the after-tax income of such business by deducting

8 from the net income an amount equal to the net income

9 multiplied by the combined marginal Federal and State

10 income tax rate for corporations.’’; and

11 (3) in section 320 (15 U.S.C. 687m), by strik12 ing ‘‘6’’ and inserting ‘‘12’’.

Æ
Order entered February 12, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01550-CV

21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-09919

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated November 15, 2012, we 

notified the district clerk that the clerk’s record was overdue. We directed the district clerk to 

file the clerk’s record within thirty days. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed. 

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within TEN 

DAYS of the date of this order, either the clerk’s record or written verification that appellant has 

not paid for the record. We notifiy appellant that if we receive verification of nonpayment, we 

will, without further notice, dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic tranmission, to the 

following:
Gary Fitzsimmons

Dallas County District Clerk

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
§ 102-37.240 How must a transfer request for surplus firearms be justified? To justify a transfer request for surplus firearms, the requesting SASP must obtain and submit to GSA a letter of intent from the intended donee that provides: ( a ) Identification of the donee applicant, including its legal name and complete address and the name, title, and telephone number of its authorized representative;
( b ) The number of compensated officers with the power to apprehend and to arrest;
( c ) A description of the firearm(s) requested;
( d ) Details on the planned use of the firearm(s); and
( e ) The number and types of donated firearms received during the previous 12 months through any other Federal program.
§ 301-73.1 What does the Federal travel management program include? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77027 , Sept. 20, 2024.
The Federal travel management program includes— ( a ) A travel authorization and claim system that implements the related requirements of the Federal Travel Regulation. (*See* §§ 301-2.1 and 301-52.3 and part 301-71 of this chapter for those requirements);
( b ) A TMS that provides reservation and ticketing support and management reports on reservation and ticketing activities. (*See* § 301-73.106 for specific services that should be provided by a TMS);
( c ) A Travel payment system for paying travel service providers in accordance to §§ 301-73.300 and 301-73.301 of this chapter;
( d ) Contracts and similar arrangements, with transportation and lodging providers (e.g., Government-contract air carriers, rental car companies, trains, hotels (e.g., FedRooms® properties), etc.) that give preferential rates and other benefits to Federal travelers on official business; and
( e ) A Travel Management Reporting System that covers financial and other travel characteristics required by the biennial Travel Survey (*see* §§ 300-70.1 through 300-70.4 of this title).
Note to § 301-73.1 :
The E-Gov Travel Service (ETS) fulfills the requirements of paragraphs (a), (b), and (e) of this section.
[FTR Amdt. 2003-07, 68 FR 71030, Dec. 22, 2003, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61540, Oct. 31, 2007; 85 FR 39849, July 2, 2020]
I

★

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4174

To amend the Small Business Act to authorize appropriations for deferred

participation loans to small business concerns detrimentally affected by

defense reductions, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1994

Mr. MACHTLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To amend the Small Business Act to authorize appropriations for deferred participation loans to small business

concerns detrimentally affected by defense reductions,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business

5 Defense Conversion Guaranteed Loan Act of 1994’’.
2

•HR 4174 IH1S

1 SEC. 2. LOANS FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS DET2 RIMENTALLY AFFECTED BY DEFENSE RE3 DUCTIONS.

4 (a) PARTICIPATION BY SBA.—Section 7(a)(21)(A) of

5 the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(21)(A)) is

6 amended by inserting ‘‘on a deferred (guaranteed) basis’’

7 after ‘‘loans’’.

8 (b) ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.—Section

9 7(a)(21)(A)(i) of such Act is amended—

10 (1) in subclause (I) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and in11 serting a semicolon; and

12 (2) by adding after subclause (II) the following:

13 ‘‘(III) a substantial reduction in the reve14 nues of the small business concern due to an

15 overall reduction in economic activity within the

16 community from which such small business con17 cern derives revenues, if such reduction in eco18 nomic activity is a direct result of the factors

19 described in subclause (I) or (II); or’’.

20 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

21 (a) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 20 of the

22 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is amended by

23 redesignating subsection (k), as added by section 115(a)

24 of the Small Business Credit and Business Opportunity

25 Enhancement Act of 1992, as subsection (q).
3

•HR 4174 IH1S

1 (b) FISCAL YEAR 1995.—Section 20(k) of such Act

2 is amended by adding at the end the following:

3 ‘‘(2) For the program authorized by section

4 7(a)(21), the Administration is authorized to make

5 not more than $2,000,000,000 in deferred participa6 tion loans.’’.

7 (c) FISCAL YEAR 1996.—Section 20(m) of such Act

8 is amended by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(2) For the program authorized by section

10 7(a)(21), the Administration is authorized to make

11 not more than $2,000,000,000 in deferred participa12 tion loans.’’.

Æ
#### § 105-67.101 Debarred, suspended and ineligible contractors.

The policies, procedures and requirements of subpart 509.4 of the General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) are incorporated by reference and made applicable to contracts for, and to contractors who engage in, the purchase of Federal personal property.

[51 FR 13500, Apr. 21, 1986]
250 E Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000 | 800-942-2677 | TTY 800-833-3722

TO: 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: 

DATE: 

State Service Commissions and AmeriCorps State and National grantees 

Jennifer Bastress Tahmasebi 

Acting Director, AmeriCorps State and National 

2017.02: AmeriCorps State and National – Child Care Benefit Eligibility Update 

23 February 2017 

AmeriCorps State and National is excited to announce an update to the child care benefit eligibility requirements for 

members; please share as appropriate to project sites, members and other stakeholders.

Effective January 1, 2017:

• Full-time Professional Corps, EAP, and Partnership Challenge members are now eligible to apply for the

AmeriCorps Child Care Benefit; please note that qualifying members (meeting all eligibility requirements) will be

awarded benefits with the effective date of January 1, 2017.

• Guidance has been published that outlines child care benefit support that may be provided for members who are

placed in a temporary suspended status. To qualify for coverage while under temporary suspended status,

members must meet all of the requirements as outlined in the Q & A below.

Are members eligible for child care benefits while under suspension?

No. Members are not eligible for benefits while under suspension. However, if a member is put in a temporary

suspended status and meets all of the below requirements, that member may be eligible to receive up to 12

consecutive weeks of continued benefits:

• The Member may not be suspended for cause and/or other disciplinary actions (an example of a qualifying

suspension would be if a member was given a temporary suspension under the Family Medical Leave Act);

• The Member must intend to return to service;

• Member must certify he/she needs the continued benefit in order to be able to return to service.

To ensure no lapse in coverage, the grantee must notify the AmeriCorps Child Care benefit administrator (GAP 

Solutions, Inc.) in writing within five business days after a member’s status changes. Costs incurred due to the 

grantee’s failure to keep the benefit administrator informed of changes in a member’s status may be charged to 

the grantee’s organization. 

For more information on the AmeriCorps Child Care Benefit Program, please

visit: http://www.americorpschildcare.com/.

Title: AmeriCorps State and National Childcare Eligibility Benefits

Date issued: February 23, 2017 

Date posted: February 28, 2020 

Unique identifier: ASN 007 

Topic: ASN Child Care Benefit Eligibility 

Summary: This is guidance on the AmeriCorps Child Care Benefit. 

The contents of this document do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. This document is 

intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

CERTIFICATION OF MARVIN PUTNAM

Marvin Putnam, Esquire, pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing the Admission, 

Practice, Peer Review, and Discipline of Attorneys, hereby certifies that: (1) I have studied the 

Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; (2) I am a 

member in good standing of the Bar of the District of California since 2001 and New York since 

1994; and (3) I have not filed three or more motions for pro hac vice admission in this District 

within the last 365 days.

/s/ Marvin Putnam

 Marvin Putnam 

Case 1:22-cv-23983-KMM Document 14-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 1 of 1
# Comments on: 2021-1924: UCB, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.