alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


Exhibit
Number

12    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges




                                   AT&T CORP.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (UNAUDITED)
                    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<TABLE>
<S>                                                                           <C>
Income from continuing operations before income taxes                         $ 460
Add distributions of less than 50% owned affiliates                               1
Add fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest and dividend
   requirements on subsidiary preferred stock and interest on
   trust preferred securities                                                   822
                                                                            -------
Total earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and
   fixed charges                                                            $ 1,283

Fixed Charges:
Total interest expense                                                        $ 767
Capitalized interest                                                             23
Interest portion of rental expense                                               55
Dividend requirements on subsidiary preferred stock and interest
   on trust preferred securities                                                103
                                                                            -------
Total fixed charges                                                           $ 948

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                              1.4

</TABLE>


                                       39
#### § 301-70.904 Must travelers whom we carry on Government aircraft be authorized to travel?

Yes, every traveler on one of your aircraft must have a written travel authorization from an authorizing executive agency, and they must present that authorization, before the flight, to the aircraft management office or its representative in the organization that owns or hires the Government aircraft. In addition to all passengers, those crewmembers and qualified non-crewmembers on a flight in which they are also traveling (*i.e.,* being transported from point to point) are considered travelers and must also be authorized to travel on Government aircraft.

[FTR Amdt. 2004-02, 69 FR 34305, June 21, 2004, as amended by FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12252, Feb. 16, 2024]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-

14(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Analogic Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, James W. Green, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 7, 2008



/s/ James W. GreenJames W. GreenPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 10-11048.

#### Walker *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, thePresident and Chief Executive Officer of American Science &Engineering, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to theundersigned’s knowledge:

 

1.             theCompany’s Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (“10-Q/A”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.             theinformation contained in the Company’s 10-Q/A being filed fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 

Date: February 15. 2005 

 
|   | /s/ Anthony  R. Fabiano                |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony R.  Fabiano                    |
|   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AmericanScience & Engineering, Inc. and will be retained by AmericanScience & Engineering, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit



Exhibit 4.12



WARRANT AMENDMENT AGREEMENT
This Warrant Amendment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made as of August 28, 2019 by and between Amyris, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Foris Ventures, LLC (the “Holder”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2019, the Company issued and sold a common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”) to the Holder, pursuant to the terms of that certain Security Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2019, between the Company and the Holder.


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder now desire to amend certain provisions of the Warrant as set forth below. 


AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.Warrant Amendment. Section 2(b) of the Warrant shall be amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 
“b) Exercise Price. The exercise price per share of the Common Stock under this Warrant shall be $3.90, subject to adjustment hereunder (the “Exercise Price”).” 
2.    Effectiveness of Amendment. This Amendment shall be effective as of the date that the stockholders of the Company have approved this Amendment in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market (or any successor entity).
3.    No Other Amendments.  Except as expressly set forth above, all of the terms and conditions of the Warrant shall remain in full force and effect.
4.    Miscellaneous.
(a)    Governing Law.  This Amendment and all acts and transactions pursuant hereto and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed, construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.
(b)    Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in two counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one instrument. 


[SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW]



The undersigned has executed this Warrant Amendment Agreement as of the date first set forth above.
	
	
	THE COMPANY:

	AMYRIS, INC.

	By:   /s/ Kathleen Valiasek      

	(Signature)

	Name: Kathleen Valiasek   

	Title: Chief Business Officer   

	 






The undersigned has executed this Warrant Amendment Agreement as of the date first set forth above.
	
	
	HOLDER:

	FORIS VENTURES, LLC

	

/s/ Barbara Hager   
(Signature)

	Name: Barbara Hager   

	Title:     

	 








-1-
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the North Carolina Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 p.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on February 9, 2000, at the North Carolina A&T State University, Hodgin Hall, Room 106, Greensboro, North Carolina 27411. The purpose of the meeting is to finalize a project proposal and to review civil rights issues. 

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Bobby D. Doctor, Director of the Southern Regional Office, 404-562-7000 (TDD 404-562-7004). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, January 11, 2000. 

Carol-Lee Hurley, 

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. 00-1600 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 690 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 690

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to add bronchiolo-alveolar 
carcinoma to the list of diseases presumed to be service-connected for 
                  certain radiation-exposed veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1999

  Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. Evans) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to add bronchiolo-alveolar 
carcinoma to the list of diseases presumed to be service-connected for 
                  certain radiation-exposed veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION THAT BRONCHIOLO-ALVEOLAR CARCINOMA IS SERVICE-
              CONNECTED.

    Section 1112(c)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(P) Bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 301-1.3 Who is eligible for TDY allowances? This chapter covers the following individuals: ( a ) Employees traveling on official business;
( b ) Interviewees performing pre-employment interview travel;
( c ) Employees who must interrupt official business travel to perform emergency travel as a result of an incapacitating illness or injury or a personal emergency situation; and
( d ) Threatened law enforcement/investigative employees and members of their family temporarily relocated to safeguard their lives because of a threat resulting from the employee's assigned duties.
November 17, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Treated Wood Council

FROM: Marc Thomas Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

On November 8, 2010, EPA met with members of the Treated Wood Council (TWC) to discuss

TWC’s comments on the “Identification of Non- Hazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Waste” proposed rule. EPA provided a broad ove rview of how treated wood was characterized in the proposed rule and answered clarifying questions. TWC provi ded copies of their comments on the proposal, as well as their comments on th e related proposed rule s under sections 112 and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). TWC comments on the related CAA rules may be found in the respective dockets to those rules (s ee EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790, EP A-HQ-OAR-2003-0119, and EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058). After the m eeting, TWC sent a follow-up email, which highlighted their main points. A copy of that email is attached.

On November 9, 2010, EPA also participated on a panel as part of TWC’s annual conference and discussed the proposed rule. The EP A answered clarifying questions.

Meeting Attendees

Jeffrey T. Miller (Treated Wood Council) Jane C. Luxton (Pepper Hamilton) Stephen T. Smith (AquAeTer) Mimi Guernica (EPA/ORCR) George Faison (EPA/ORCR) (by phone) Lyn Luben (EPA/ORCR) Marc Thomas (EPA/ORCR)
250 E Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000 | 800-942-2677 | TTY 800-833-3722

To: Deborah Jeffrey

Inspector General 

From: Lori Giblin/s/

Chief Risk Officer 

Subject: High-Dollar Overpayments for the quarter ending March 31, 2018 – Revised to 

include susceptible program names

Date: May 24, 2018

The purpose of this document is to comply with the High-Dollar overpayments' reporting 

requirements in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123, Appendix C. 

Appendix C requires agency heads to submit reports quarterly on High-Dollar 

overpayments to the Office of Inspector General.

The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) identifies high-dollar 

overpayments through improper payments testing, which has not yet begun for FY2017. 

Therefore, during the reporting period covering 1/01/2018 through 03/31/2018, CNCS 

has not identified any high-dollar overpayments in its four susceptible programs: 

AmeriCorps State and National, the Foster Grandparent Program (FGP), the Retired and 

Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP), and the Senior Companion Program (SCP).

This report upholds the Corporation’s commitment to carrying out the Executive Order’s 

goals of eliminating payment errors. Reducing improper payments remains vital for the 

Corporation. We continue to monitor programs in order to reduce the amount of 

overpayments.
No. 11-1040.

#### Friends of the Norbeck et al. *v.*United States Forest Service et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 301-13.2 Under what conditions will my agency pay for my additional travel expense(s) under this part? When an additional travel expense is necessary to accommodate a special physical need which is either: ( a ) Clearly visible and discernible; or
( b ) Substantiated in writing by a competent medical authority.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Richard E. Otto, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Corautus Genetics Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Reserved; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:March 22, 2005
EXHIBIT (32)

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of American Greetings
Corporation on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), each of the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American Greetings Corporation.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

October 8, 2008



|                                                             |  |  |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | 
|/s/ Zev Weiss ---------------------------------------        |  |  |  |  |  | 
|Zev Weiss                                                    |  |  |  |  |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)        |  |  |  | 
|                                                             |  |  | 
|/s/ Stephen J. Smith --------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | 
|Stephen J. Smith                                             |  |  |  |  |  | 
|Senior Vice President and                                    |  |  |  |  |  | 
|Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)        |  |  |  |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6351

JOHN HENRY JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden, Federal Prison Camp,

Cumberland, MD,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(8:04-cv-03414-AW)

Submitted: July 17, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Henry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale,

James A. Frederick, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Henry Johnson, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Johnson v. Dewalt, No. 8:04-cv-03414-AW (D.

Md. filed Dec. 22, 2005; entered Dec. 27, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment

of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**197 CA 14-00716**  PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

GLADYS LAVERDI AND FRANCIS M. LAVERDI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V ORDER

ARONA S. BAKER AND PATRICK L. EMMERLING, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF BERNICE E. BAKER, DECEASED, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

LAW OFFICES OF WAYNE C. FELLE, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (ELIZABETH A. BRUCE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

BURGIO, KITA, CURVIN & BANKER, BUFFALO (STEVEN P. CURVIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), entered November 13, 2013 in a personal injury action. The order granted the motion of defendants for an open commission and letters rogatory for the deposition of Kathryn R. Wilkins, M.D., a nonparty witness.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Results on the Ground www.mcc.gov

Hazmat Training Ensures Nationwide 

Safe Disposal of Construction Waste

Construction often involves working with and around hazardous materials, which if left untreated can 

cause illness to workers, environmental destruction and long-term health problems. And when a city is in 

the midst of a construction boom—like the one underway in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia—proper handling of 

hazardous materials and their proper disposal becomes even more important.

Through its five-year, $285 million compact, the Millennium Challenge Corporation is working with 

Millennium Challenge Account-Mongolia to ensure the adoption of the international standard for management of hazardous materials and wastes for the renovation or construction of buildings—an approach 

used only sparingly in Mongolia until recently.

Hazardous materials used to be dumped in this trash site right outside of Ulaanbaatar.
Hazmat Training Ensures Nationwide Safe Disposal of Construction Waste  | June 4, 2012 2

MCA-Mongolia has worked 

tirelessly over the past several 

years to raise general awareness 

of the importance of proper 

management of construction 

hazardous wastes. As a result of 

these efforts, the Government 

of Mongolia has recently 

banned the use of asbestos in 

construction. 

Batsaikhan Usukh, MCAMongolia’s environmental and 

social assessment director for 

MCA-M, said he initially found 

it challenging to reach a common 

understanding with stakeholders 

on how to incorporate hazardous 

materials and waste management 

into compact implementation. 

The next, more difficult step was to convince all construction contractors to comply with the Hazardous 

Materials and Wastes Management Plans (HMWMP), as required by MCA-M’s hazardous materials and 

wastes management guidelines. These standards were the first of their kind in Mongolia.

With the compact now in its fourth year, Batsaikhan reports all contractors have been implementing 

HMWMP successfully. 

“It was a pleasure to observe during our monitoring visits that the adherence of the contractors to the 

HMWMPs was satisfactory” he said. “My feeling is that the key to success is the close working cooperation between MCA-Mongolia and its contractors.”

In April 2012, MCC and the environmental and social assessment staff from MCA-Mongolia conducted 

a joint field trip to listen to impressions of beneficiaries after the completion of construction renovation 

works. The director of the Technical and Vocational Education College in Darkhan reported the construction work at the college is being completed in accordance with the guidelines. The college is also incorporating hazardous materials training into its curriculum.

The compact is expected to benefit 1.7 million people and raise household incomes by more than $217 

million. Its construction activities and a greater awareness about hazardous materials are working to create a healthier Mongolia.

MCA-Mongolia built an interim hazardous waste disposal and storage site to 

ensure proper handling of hazardous materials. 

2012-002-1102-01