alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                AMERITRUCK DISTRIBUTION CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (In thousands, except ratio amounts)
                                  (unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                 Twelve Months Ended December 31
                                          ---------------------------------------------
                                            1992     1993    1994     1995      1996
                                          --------  ------  -------  -------  ---------
<S>                                       <C>       <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>

Earnings:
 Income (loss) before income taxes
   and extraordinary items                $(1,282)  $3,551  $ 5,431  $ 5,677   $(1,892)
                                          -------   ------  -------  -------   -------

Fixed charges:
 Interest expense and amortization of
  debt discount and premium on all
  indebtedness                              3,438    3,783    3,422    4,993    16,677
 Portion of rent under long-term
  operating leases representative of an
  interest factor                             826      306      309      573     1,658
 Preferred stock dividend requirements
  of consolidated subsidiaries              1,139    1,224    1,486      188         -
                                          -------   -------   ------  -------  -------
      Total fixed charges                   5,403    5,313    5,217    5,754    18,335
                                          -------   ------  -------  -------   -------

 Earnings before income taxes,
  extraordinary items and fixed charges     4,121    8,864   10,648   11,431    16,443
                                          =======   ======  =======   ======   =======


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              *    1.67x    2.04x    1.99x         *
                                          =======   ======  =======  =======   =======

</TABLE>

* The Company's earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $1,892 and
  $1,282 for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1992, respectively.

                                       53
TOWER SPECS PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST

ENVIRONMENTAL:

□ Check for people, animals, property in the flight vicinity.

□ Notify any bystanders or nearby property owner of your intentions.

□ If flying in controlled airspace, notify airspace authority of your intentions.

□ First Aid / Safety Kit on hand, stocked, readily accessible, and visible to anyone in the area 

HARDWARE / EQUIPMENT:

** VISUALLY INSPECT THE AIRFRAME **

□ Cracks (especially in high stress areas like joints)

□ Loose or damaged screws / fasteners / bands / straps / ties

□ Loose or damaged wiring

□ Loose or damaged connections (solder, plugs, etc)

□ Inspect prop mounts & screws & apply slight counter pressure on arms to check for loosened construction 

□ Battery/batteries fully charged, properly seated & secured

□ Remove props and test fail-safe behavior (if applicable)

□ Props are smooth and free of damage/defect (check blade, surface, & hub)

□ Tighten prop adapters (careful not to over tighten which may damage prop)

□ Ensure voltage alarm is connected

□ Ensure arming/idle timeout is properly configured (6-15 seconds is generally acceptable)

□ Check whether the right model is selected in the transmitter (if applicable)

□ Check your RC transmitter shows the right range and centering for all sticks

□ If desired, perform range test 

PRE-FLIGHT: 

** POWER UP **

□ Batteries charged & secured

□ Position quad in a level, safe location for takeoff

□ If using onboard video recorder, turn on camera 

□ All transmitter controls move freely in all directions

□ All transmitter trims in its neutral position

□ All transmitter switches in correct position (typically away)

□ Transmitter throttle to zero

□ Radio transmitter on

□ Connect/power on battery to airframe

□ Ensure led indicators & audible tones are all correct (e.g., GPS and Compass are properly calibrated) 

□ Timer on (if applicable)

□ Scan for nearby people or animals

□ Stand clear - audibly, loudly announce the word "CLEAR!"

□ Arm flight controller

**PRE TAKEOFF **

□ Increase throttle slightly listening for any abnormalities 

□ Short 20-30 second hover at 3-5 feet (listen for any weird vibrations or anything that sounds loose)
No. 11-881.

#### Merrifield *v.*Board of County Commissioners for the County of Santa Fe, New Mexico, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Natoma

Manors

Bay

Heights

Golden Pines

North

Grove

Shorecrest

Bay Point

Miami International Airport

Morningside

Grapeland Heights

Little Havana Dodge Island

Shenandoah

Virginia Key

Auburndale

Liberty City

Silver Bluff

Wynwood

Little River

Downtown

The Roads

Allapattah

Little Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

C

O

C

O

N

U

T

G

R

O

V

E

pU

ep Er sa St edi

r et a wegdE

D

1

Alt. M

a

p

Ve

rsio

n

1

4

Districts

12345

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-26 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                          20859
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22662
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    502157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               558767
<PP&E>                                         165692
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 684482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          409439
<BONDS>                                         37378
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          233
<OTHER-SE>                                     186943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   684482
<SALES>                                        536297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               543786
<CGS>                                          379461
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  379461
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               147717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3192 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13416
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5011
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8405
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8405
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .35
        


</TABLE>
§ 109-40.5005 Description of property for shipment. ( a ) Each shipment shall be described on the bill of lading or other shipping document as specified by the governing freight classification, carrier's tariff, or rate tender. Shipments shall be described as specifically as possible. Trade names such as “Foamite” or “Formica,” or general terms such as “vehicles,” “furniture,” or “Government supplies,” shall not be used as bill of lading descriptions.
( b ) A shipment containing hazardous materials, such as explosives, radioactive materials, flammable liquids, flammable solids, oxidizers, or poison A or poison B, shall be prepared for shipment and described on bills of lading or other shipping documents in accordance with the Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulation, 49 CFR, subchapter C.
No. 10-11018.

#### Enyart *v.*Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Franklin County. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Corautus Genetics Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. Otto, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard E. OttoRichard E. OttoPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 22, 2005
§ 102-33.215 May we use Government aircraft to carry passengers? Yes, you may use Government aircraft to carry passengers with the following restrictions: ( a ) You may carry passengers only on aircraft that you operate or require contractually to be operated in accordance with the rules and requirements in 14 CFR; and
( b ) For certain kinds of travel, your agency must justify passengers' presence on Government aircraft. See OMB Circular A-126 and the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) §§ 301-10.260 through 301-10.266, and 301-70.800 through 301-70.808, and 301-70.910 (41 CFR 301-10.260 through 301-10.266, 301-70.800 through 301-70.808, and 301-70.910) for complete information on authorizing travel and analyzing costs before authorizing travel on Government aircraft.
338P15

#### State v. Christopher Adam Turbyfill

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-1003)

Denied
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20325 Conference Calendar

LUIS SANTOS LAGAITE, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DALE MYERS; JENIFFER HUDGGINS; SAM PRESTWOOD, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CV-2710

-------------------- December 14, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Luis S. Lagaite, Jr., Texas prisoner # 762508, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights suit following entry of summary judgment for defendant Myers. Lagaite argues that the court erred in dismissing his claim that the defendant denied him access to the courts by interfering with his legal mail. Lagaite also argues that the court should have appointed counsel to represent him, erred in denying discovery to him, and erred in denying his motion for default judgment.No. 99-20325 -2- Lagaite’s right of access to the courts is limited to his right to challenge his conviction or the conditions of his confinement. See Lewis v. Casey , 518 U.S. 343, 355 (1996). The legal mail at issue in this case is unrelated to these rights. Thus, the district court did not err in granting summary judgment to defendant and dismissing Lagaite’s complaint. Lagaite did not request that the district court appoint counsel for him, nor did Lagaite move the district court to continue Myers’s summary-judgment motion pending discovery, and thus Lagaite did not preserve these issues for appeal. See Burch v. Coca-Cola Co. , 119 F.3d 305, 319 (5th Cir. 1997). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Lagaite’s motions to subpoena witnesses for deposition because Lagaite did not support the need for such depositions. See Feist v. Jefferson County Comm’r Court , 778 F.2d 250, 252 (5th Cir. 1985). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Lagaite’s motion for default judgment because defendant Myers had filed an answer to the complaint. See Mason v. Lister , 562 F.2d 343, 345 (5th Cir. 1977). Lagaite’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because his appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Lagaite already had at least two “strikes” in Lagaite v. Hale , No. H-97-2377 (S.D. Tex. November 25, 1997) and Lagaite v. Hale , No. 97-21034 (5th Cir.No. 99-20325 -3- October 22, 1998). Lagaite has now accumulated at least three “strikes” under § 1915(g). He may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.
No. 10-10972.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 301-71.212 Should we report late payment fees as wages on a Form W-2?

No, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has determined that the late payment fee is in the nature of interest (compensation for the use of money).

[FTR Amdt. 90, 65 FR 3058, Jan. 19, 2000]
Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF POLICY

M EMORANDUM SUBJECT: Transmittal to Docket: Summary o f t he March 1 5 , 2011, Public Meeting in

Springfield, Missouri , regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s Implementation of Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review FROM: Stuart C. Miles - McLean

Office of Regulatory Policy and Management TO: Public Docket #EPA - HQ - OA - 2011 - 0156: Im p roving Regulations: General As called for b y President Obama in Executive Order 13563, "to facilitate the periodic review of existing significant regulations," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering "how best to promote retrospective analy sis of rules that may be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify , streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been learned." As part of its retrospective re view of regulatio ns, EPA convened public meetings around the country to gather input on how we might design the plan we will use to periodicall y review our regulations. T his Memo transmits to the docket a summary of the public meeting held on March 1 5 , 20 11, in Springfield, Missouri
.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              926540
<SECURITIES>                                        270521
<RECEIVABLES>                                        22390
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1154773
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1895532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                27136
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             12610
<OTHER-SE>                                          807393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1895532
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    128124
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        90680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         66743
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         50253
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .04
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4996 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4996

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 
     reduction in the market basket percentage increase under the 
 prospective payment system under the Medicare Program for payments to 
                         small rural hospitals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mrs. Emerson) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 
     reduction in the market basket percentage increase under the 
 prospective payment system under the Medicare Program for payments to 
                         small rural hospitals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF RURAL HOSPITAL MARKET BASKET INCREASE 
              PERCENTAGE REDUCTION.

    Subclauses (XVI) and (XVII) of section 1886(b)(3)(B)(i) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B)(i)) are amended to read 
as follows:
            ``(XVI) for fiscal year 2001, the market basket percentage 
        increase minus 1.1 percentage points for hospitals (other than 
        sole community hospitals and hospitals located in a rural area 
        with less than 100 beds) in all areas, and the market basket 
        percentage increase for sole community hospitals and hospitals 
        located in a rural area with less than 100 beds,
            ``(XVII) for fiscal year 2002, the market basket percentage 
        increase minus 1.1 percentage points for hospitals (other than 
        hospitals located in a rural area with less than 100 beds) in 
        all areas and the market basket percentage increase hospitals 
        located in a rural area with less than 100 beds, and''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 102-34.285 Where can we obtain help in setting up a maintenance program?

For help in setting up a maintenance program, contact the: General Services Administration, Attn: Motor Vehicle Policy, Washington, DC 20405. E-mail: *vehicle.policy@gsa.gov.*
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 18, 2017

No. 04-16-00252-CV

Jean Eckford HARDAWAY, Et al.,

Appellants

v.

Lou Eda Korth Stubbs NIXON, Et al.,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-09-0188-CVK

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due on November 21, 2016. Ms. Stella Grace Marks 

represents appellant on appeal. This court has granted Ms. Marks two extensions of time in 

which to file the brief, the latest until January 3, 2017. Neither the brief nor a third motion for 

extension of time has been filed. 

We, therefore, ORDER Ms. Marks to file, on or before January 30, 2017, appellant’s 

brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) her failure to timely file the brief and (2) 

why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). If Ms. Marks fails to file appellant’s brief and the written response on or 

before January 30, 2017, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id.; see also 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of January, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than July 10, 2000. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272: 

1. Charles Asher Rosebrough, III, and Nancy King Rosebrough, both of Graham, Texas; to retain voting shares of First Graham Bancorp, Inc., Graham, Texas, and thereby retain voting shares of First National Bank, Graham, Texas. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 19, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-15821 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 105-68.1020 Voluntary exclusion or voluntarily excluded. ( a ) *Voluntary exclusion* means a person's agreement to be excluded under the terms of a settlement between the person and one or more agencies. Voluntary exclusion must have governmentwide effect.
( b ) *Voluntarily excluded* means the status of a person who has agreed to a voluntary exclusion.