alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Natoma

Manors

Bay

Heights

Golden Pines

North

Grove

Shorecrest

Bay Point

Miami International Airport

Morningside

Grapeland Heights

Little Havana Dodge Island

Shenandoah

Virginia Key

Auburndale

Liberty City

Silver Bluff

Wynwood

Little River

Downtown

The Roads

Allapattah

Little Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

C

O

C

O

N

U

T

G

R

O

V

E

pU

ep Er sa St edi

r et a wegdE

P

4

-

Plain

tiffs’ M

a

p

4

Districts

12345

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-37 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-85.175 Are the standard level services for cleaning, mechanical operation, and maintenance identified in an OA?

Unless specified otherwise in the OA, standard level services for cleaning, mechanical operation, and maintenance shall be provided in accordance with the GSA standard level of services as defined in § 102-85.165, and in the PBS Customer Guide to Real Property. A copy of the guide may be obtained from the General Services Administration, Office of Business Performance (PX), 1800 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20405.
#### § 109-38.403 Responsibility for damages.
From: Mohan Nagavedu [mnagavedu@aqmd.gov]

Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 4:33 PM

To: Adams, Lucy H.

Cc: Mulrine.Phil@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Chrome Source Test Reports

‐ 3 of 3

Attachments: Size Control_2001.pdf; Triumph (DV Industries)_2004.pdf; Whiting

Enterprises_2004.pdf

Hi Lucy / Phil

Please see attached the scanned summaries and evaluations for the reports, from the list you

provided. Due to the size I am sending in separate e

‐ mails

.

Thanks,

Complied by Eric Padilla

===========================================

P. Eric Padilla

Air Quality Engineer

SCAQMD, Source Test Engineering

21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765

(909)396

‐ 2265

(909)396

‐ 2099 Fax

epadilla@aqmd.gov

===========================================
§ 102-75.60 What are landholding agencies' responsibilities concerning real property surveys? A landholding agency's responsibilities concerning real property utilization surveys are to— ( a ) Survey real property under its control (i.e., property reported on its financial statements) at least annually to identify property that is not utilized, underutilized, or not being put to optimum use. When other needs for the property are identified or recognized, the agency must determine whether continuation of the current use or another use would better serve the public interest, considering both the Federal agency's needs and the property's location. In conducting annual reviews of their property holdings, the GSA Customer Guide to Real Property Disposal can provide guidelines for Executive agencies to consider in identifying unneeded Federal real property;
( b ) Maintain its inventory of real property at the absolute minimum consistent with economical and efficient conduct of the affairs of the agency; and
( c ) Promptly report to GSA real property that it has determined to be excess.
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge 

Shawn Brient Pritchett 

Matthew Lay 

Rochelle Ngyuen 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
#### § 301-72.203 When may we limit traveler reimbursement for a cash payment?

If you determine that the cash payment was made under a non-emergency circumstance, reimbursement to the traveler must not exceed the cost which would have been properly chargeable to the Government had the traveler used a government provided payment resource, (e.g., individual Government contractor-issued travel charge card, centrally billed account, or GTR). However, an agency can determine to make full payment when circumstances warrant (e.g., invitational travel, infrequent travelers and interviewees).

[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15976, Apr. 1, 1998; 63 FR 35538, June 30, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61540, Oct. 31, 2007]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 123 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16091]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences; Committee of 
Visitors; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences (1110): 
Committee of Visitors (COV) Review for Biomolecular Structure & 
Function and Biomolecular Processes in the Division of Molecular & 
Cellular Biosciences.
    Date and Time: July, 10-12, 2000; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 310, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    Contact Person: Maryanna Henkart, Division Director for 
Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia, (703) 306-1440.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out Committee of Visitors (COV) 
review, including program evaluation, GPRA assessments, and access 
to privileged materials.
    Type of Meeting: Part open (see agenda below):

Agenda

    Closed: July 10, (10 a.m.-5 p.m.); July 11 (8:30 a.m.-1 p.m., 
and 2 p.m.-5 p.m.); and July 12 (8:30 a.m.-1 p.m. and 2 p.m.-5 
p.m.)--To review the merit review processes covering funding 
decisions made during the immediately preceding three fiscal years 
of programs in the Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences.
    Open: July 10 (8:30 a.m.-10 a.m.); July 11 (1 p.m.-2 p.m.), and 
July 12 (1 p.m.-2 p.m.)--To assess the results of NSF program 
investments in the Molecular and Cellular Biosciences Division. This 
shall involve a discussion and review of results focused on NSF and 
grantee outputs and related outcomes achieved or realized during the 
preceding three fiscal years. These results may be based on NSF 
grants or other investments made in earlier years.
    Reason for Closing: During the closed session, the Committee 
will be reviewing proposal actions that will include information of 
a proprietary nature, including technical information; financial 
data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning 
individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt 
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: June 21, 2000.
Karen L. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-16091 Filed 6-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 793 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 793

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt licensed 
  funeral directors and licensed embalmers from the minimum wage and 
            overtime compensation requirements of that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1999

  Mr. Graham (for himself, Mr. Andrews, Mr. Talent, Mrs. Fowler, Mrs. 
   Myrick, and Mr. Metcalf) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt licensed 
  funeral directors and licensed embalmers from the minimum wage and 
            overtime compensation requirements of that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LICENSED FUNERAL DIRECTORS.

    Section 13(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
213(a)) is amended by striking the period at the end of paragraph (17) 
and inserting ``; or'' and by adding after paragraph (17) the 
following:
            ``(18) any employee employed as a licensed funeral director 
        or a licensed embalmer.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-11028.

#### Weatherall *v.*Sloan, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 302-15.7 For what property may my agency authorize payment under this part?

Under this part, payment may be authorized only for your residence at the last official station in the United States from which you transferred.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 808 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 808

 To extend for 3 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of 
            title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1999

 Mr. Smith of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Gekas, Mr. Minge, Mr. Shows, 
    Mr. Barrett of Nebraska, Mr. Leach, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. 
  Boehlert, and Mr. McHugh) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend for 3 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of 
            title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law 105-277 is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``April 1, 1999'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``July 1, 1999'',
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``September 30, 1998'' and 
                inserting ``March 31, 1999'', and
                    (B) by striking ``October 1, 1998'' and inserting 
                ``April 1, 1999'', and
            (3) by striking subsection (c).

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on April 1, 
1999.
                                 <all>
```
***********************************************The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it wasreleased as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods fo r filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion.

All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appella te Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the adva nce release version of an opinion and the latest version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports , the latest version is to
be considered authoritative.

The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official repo rts are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, Stat e of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut.
***********************************************IN RE AVA W.—CONCURRENCE
MULLINS, J., concurring. I agree with the result. In the present case, it was the child who originally sought posttermination visitation. The child consistently reque sted posttermination visitation throughout the termination proceeding and joins the respondent’s appeal, asserting that the trial court has authority to consider that request for posttermination visitation. For that reason, I agree with the majority that the court in the present case had the authority to consider posttermination visitation orders under General Statutes § 46b-121 (b) (1).

Accordingly, I concur in the majority opinion.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-22846-DPG

VICTOR ARIZA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

TANDY LEATHER COMPANY, INC.,

a foreign for-profit corporation,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, by and through his undersigned Counsel, and Defendant,

TANDY LEATHER COMPANY, INC., by and through undersigned counsel, hereby provide

notice that the parties have reached a settlement and will be executing necessary paperwork 

resolving all claims and matters in the case. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the 

Court provide the parties twenty (20) days from the date of filing this Notice to allow the parties to 

finalize the settlement agreement and file dismissal documents with prejudice.

Dated: October 26, 2022.

Respectfully submitted, 

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

4800 N. Hiatus Road Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Sunrise, FL 33351 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

 Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595

Case 1:22-cv-22846-DPG Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK

& STEWART, P.C.

Counsel for Defendant

Two Datran Center

9130 South Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1625

Miami, FL 33156

(305) 455-3710

Paul.deboe@ogletreedeakins.com

By: /s/ Paul J. Deboe

 PAUL J. DEBOE

 Florida Bar No: 52051

Case 1:22-cv-22846-DPG Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2022 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 39612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-351-000]


Stingray Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

June 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 16, 2000, Stingray Pipeline Company 
(Stingray) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume 1, the revised tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the 
filing. Stingray proposes that the foregoing tariff sheets be made 
effective on July 1, 2000.
    Stingray states this filing is made to reflect changes relating to 
the implementation of a new Interactive Internet Website.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16137 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-11011.

#### Lawrence *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 301-70.908 Must we make information available to the public about travel by senior Federal officials and non-Federal travelers on Government aircraft?

Yes, an agency that operates aircraft must make records about travelers on those aircraft available to the public in response to written requests under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), except for portions exempt from disclosure under that Act (such as classified information).
§ 102-75.1170 How will information be collected? ( a ) *Canvass of landholding agencies.* On a quarterly basis, HUD will canvass landholding agencies to collect information about property described as unutilized, underutilized, excess, or surplus in surveys conducted by the agencies under 40 U.S.C. 524, Executive Order 12512, and subpart H of this part. Each canvass will collect information on properties not previously reported and about property reported previously the status or classification of which has changed or for which any of the information reported on the property checklist has changed. ( 1 ) HUD will request descriptive information on properties sufficient to make a reasonable determination, under the criteria described below, of the suitability of a property for use as a facility to assist the homeless.
( 2 ) HUD will direct landholding agencies to respond to requests for information within 25 days of receipt of such requests.
( b ) *Agency annual report.* By December 31 of each year, each landholding agency must notify HUD regarding the current availability status and classification of each property controlled by the agency that— ( 1 ) Was included in a list of suitable properties published that year by HUD; and
( 2 ) Remains available for application for use to assist the homeless, or has become available for application during that year.
( c ) *GSA inventory.* HUD will collect information, in the same manner as described in paragraph (a) of this section, from GSA regarding property that is in GSA's current inventory of excess or surplus property.
( d ) *Change in status.* If the information provided on the property checklist changes subsequent to HUD's determination of suitability, and the property remains unutilized, underutilized, excess or surplus, the landholding agency must submit a revised property checklist in response to the next quarterly canvass. HUD will make a new determination of suitability and, if it differs from the previous determination, republish the property information in the Federal Register. For example, property determined unsuitable for national security concerns may no longer be subject to security restrictions, or property determined suitable may subsequently be found to be contaminated.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 660 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.660

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
 For the private relief of Ruth Hairston by waiver of a filing deadline 
  for appeal from a ruling relating to her application for a survivor 
                                annuity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That for purposes of a 
petition by Mrs. Ruth Hairston for review of the final order issued 
October 31, 1995, by the Merit Systems Protection Board with respect to 
its docket number SF-0831-95-0754-I-1, the 30-day filing deadline in 
section 7703(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is waived.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
501 P.2d 568

#### Mary E. PERRY, surviving spouse and administratrix of the Estate of George Alfred Perry, Deceased, Appellant v. Mildred PERRY and George Perry husband and wife, Appellees.

No. 1 CA-CIV 1771.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Oct. 3, 1972.

*300W. Roy Tribble, Chandler, for appellant.

Fannin & Cruse, by Robert J. Cruse, Phoenix, for appellees.

HAIRE, Chief Judge,

Division 1.

On this appeal the surviving spouse of the decedent contends that the trial court committed error in denying her claim to certain insurance proceeds and entering summary judgment for the defendant-appellee, the mother of the decedent.

The uncontroverted facts were that two life insurance policies were purchased prior to the deceased’s marriage to his surviving spouse. We say “uncontroverted” inasmuch as the appellant filed no controverting affidavits. Under such circumstances the allegations of her complaint are insufficient to raise factual issues, and the facts stated in the movant’s affidavit must be taken as true. Rule 56(e), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. The deceased's mother was initially designated as beneficiary on both policies, and no beneficiary changes were ever made. All of the premiums on one of the policies were paid by the mother with her own funds. All premiums on the other policy were paid by the mother from the deceased’s *separate*income coming from a pension from the United States Marine Corps, granted for services rendered prior to the time of the deceased’s marriage to appellant. *See*De Funiak & Vaughn, Principles of Community Property, § 75 at 176 (2d ed. 1971), regarding the community or separate property nature of pension payments.

Since both policies were purchased prior to marriage, they were not community property, but rather were the separate property of the husband. A.R.S. § 25-213, subsec. A. Furthermore, since no community funds were used to pay premiums thereon, the community can claim no lien on the proceeds of these policies. *See*Rothman v. Rumbeck, 54 Ariz. 443, 96 P.2d 755 (1939). Likewise, since the proceeds of these policies do not form a part of the probate estate, the court may not award a widow’s allowance therefrom, pursuant to the provisions of A.R.S. §§ 14— 513, 14—514 and 14-515, as contended by appellant.

The judgment is affirmed.

EUBANK and JACOBSON, JJ., concur.