alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 758

For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO WIDOW’S INSURANCE BENE4 FITS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of determining the

6 eligibility of Nancy B. Wilson, the wife of Alphonse M.

7 Wilson (social security number 271–18–9548), to widow’s

8 insurance benefits under section 202(e) of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 402(e)), Nancy B. Wilson shall be

10 deemed to have been married to Alphonse M. Wilson for

11 a period of not less than 9 months immediately prior to

12 the day on which Alphonse M. Wilson died.
2

•HR 758 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) takes effect

2 on March 21, 1991.

3 (c) PAYMENT.—Any benefits to which Nancy B. Wil4 son is entitled for the period prior to the date of the enact5 ment of this Act shall be paid to her in a lump sum.

Æ
#### § 102-79.105 What is the Integrated Workplace?

The Integrated Workplace, developed by the GSA Office of Governmentwide Policy, is a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to developing workspace and work strategies that best support an organization's strategic business goals and work processes, and have the flexibility to accommodate the changing needs of the occupants and the organization. Integrated Workplace concepts support the objectives of Executive Order 13327, “Federal Real Property Asset Management,” which calls for the enhancement of Federal agency productivity through an improved working environment.
#### William B. Loudenslager, respondent, *v.*John Stafford and Ambassador Hotel Corporation, appellants.

[Decided November 17th, 1919.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, reported in *91 N. J. Eq. 1.*

*Mr. Norman*Grey, for the respondent.

*Mr. Clarence L. Cole,*for the appellants.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in ‘ the opinion filed in the court below by Chancellor Walker.

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Swayzb, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisot-i, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Ackerson — 8.

*For reversal*— Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Taylor, Gardner — 6.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 685

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to ensure that the receipts

and disbursements of the Social Security trust funds are not included

in a unified Federal budget.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. MOORE (for himself, Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. HOEFFEL,

Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. BOYD, Mr. FORD, and Mr. DEFAZIO)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to ensure that

the receipts and disbursements of the Social Security

trust funds are not included in a unified Federal budget.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 685 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST

2 FUNDS FROM THE UNIFIED FEDERAL BUDG3 ET.

4 Section 201 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

5 401) is amended by adding at the end the following new

6 subsection:

7 ‘‘(n)(1) The receipts and disbursements of the Fed8 eral Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the

9 Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund (including taxes

10 upon which any such receipts are based)—

11 ‘‘(A) shall not be included in the Federal budg12 et baseline for any fiscal year, and

13 ‘‘(B) shall not be counted as new budget au14 thority, outlays, receipts, or deficit or surplus for

15 purposes of—

16 ‘‘(i) offsetting any tax decrease, or

17 ‘‘(ii) offsetting any spending increase.

18 ‘‘(2) Any official statement issued by the Office of

19 Management and Budget or by the Congressional Budget

20 Office of surplus or deficit totals of the budget of the

21 United States Government as submitted by the President

22 or of the surplus or deficit totals of the congressional

23 budget, and any description of, or reference to, such totals

24 in any official publication or material issued by either of

25 such Offices, shall exclude the receipts and disbursements

26 totals of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance
3

•HR 685 IH

1 Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust

2 Fund (including taxes upon which any such receipts are

3 based).’’.

4 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

5 The amendment made by this Act shall apply to fiscal

6 years beginning on or after October 1, 2000.

Æ
# Comments on: 17-1575: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC v. SANDOZ INC. [OPINION], Precedential
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

130 

KA 08-00621 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARQUES T. CRISLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DREW R. DUBRIN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (JOSEPH D. WALDORF OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(Francis A. Affronti, J.), rendered January 29, 2008. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession

of a weapon in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree

(Penal Law § 265.03 [3]), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred

in refusing to suppress the gun and other tangible evidence found

inside the coat that he discarded while fleeing from the police. We

reject that contention. The initial observations of defendant by the

police gave rise to an objective, credible reason for approaching him

and asking him, in a manner that was “devoid of harassment or

intimidation,” where he had been prior to his encounter with the

police (People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 220; see People v Hollman, 79

NY2d 181, 190-191; People v Moyaho,12 AD3d 692, 693, lv denied 4 NY3d

766). Contrary to the contention of defendant, his response to the

request for that information, coupled with the observation by the

police of a bulge in defendant’s pocket that appeared to be consistent

with a hidden firearm, provided the police with justification for

taking the minimal precautionary measure of asking defendant to remove

his hand from his pocket (see De Bour, 40 NY2d at 221; People v

Herold, 282 AD2d 1, 7, lv denied 97 NY2d 682; People v Dawson, 243

AD2d 318, lv denied 91 NY2d 890). We further conclude under the

circumstances of this case that the police had the requisite

reasonable suspicion to pursue defendant when he immediately fled in

response to the request to remove his hand from his pocket (see People

v Cruz, 14 AD3d 730, lv denied 4 NY3d 852; People v Fajardo, 209 AD2d

284, lv denied 84 NY2d 1031; see generally People v Sierra, 83 NY2d
-2- 130 

KA 08-00621 

928, 929), and that the coat was discarded by defendant during that

lawful pursuit (see People v Terry, 190 AD2d 1064, 1065, lv denied 81

NY2d 1081).

By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his further contention

that the court should have adjourned the suppression hearing to enable

him to obtain additional evidence to present at the suppression

hearing (see generally People v Campbell, 73 NY2d 481, 486; People v

Oliveri, 49 AD3d 1208, 1209; People v Pryor, 12 AD3d 695, lv denied 4

NY3d 802).

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
SERVED: August 19, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATIER OF RICKY ZIV DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0118 (Civil Penalty Action).

REQUEST TO WITHDRAW REQUEST FOR HEARING 

# RECEIVED AUG 272014 

# HEARING DOCKET

COMES NOW, Respondent, Ricky Ziv, andrequests the withdrawal ofthe hearing scheduled in the matterofthe Notice of Proposed Civil Penaltyissued April18, 2014 (Case No. 2014WA910001).

/s/JayTrumble JayTrumble Attorney for Respondent, Ricky Ziv Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO 501 Third Street NW Washington, DC 20001SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL 

### & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite 2W1000 ONE COPY-BY FASCIMILE Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional counsel, AWp-7 Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region, P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-3454 FAX: 310-725-6816
The Honorable Richard 

### C. Goodwin, Administrative LawJudge Office of Hearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2014-0118 (Civil Penalty Action)
§ 102-5.50 May determinations be made in advance for employees who respond to unusual circumstances when they arise? Yes, determinations may be made in advance when the Federal agency wants to have employees ready to respond to: ( a ) A clear and present danger;
( b ) An emergency; or
( c ) A compelling operational consideration.
Note to § 102-5.50 :
Implementation of these determinations is contingent upon one of the three circumstances occurring. Thus, these may be referred to as “contingency determinations.”
EXHIBIT 11.1

COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE

                                                                  March 31,
                                                                    1995
                                     Year Ended    Year Ended    (Inception)
                                      June 30,      June 30,     to June 30,
                                        1996          1997          1997

Net Loss                           $(4,280,740)  $(3,570,899)   $(8,508,519)

Preferred Stock Dividends                   -      ( 215,336)     ( 215,336)

Net Loss with Preferred Dividends  $(4,280,740)  $(3,786,235)   $(8,723,855)

Earnings Per Share                 $     (0.43)  $     (0.34)   $     (0.84)

Weighted Average Common Shares
                   Outstanding       9,943,869    11,284,874     10,446,756
1 

Performance Measures Module (eGrants) Instructions

The eGrants system requires applicants to select, enter information, and validate a minimum of one 

Performance Measure in the Performance Measures Module in order to submit an application in the 

system. The content of the Performance Measures Module will not be reviewed, and applicants will not 

be responsible for the targets set in the module. Applicants will only be evaluated on performance 

information in the application narrative. 

1. Click Begin.

2. Select “Other Community Priorities” focus area. 
2 

3. Then check the box to select an objective. Then select Next. 

4. Enter 1 into the # of Volunteers and # of Project Hour fields and select Next.
3 

5. Select an objective from the dropdown list, and enter N/A into all required fields. Click the 

checkbox for the intervention.

6. On this same screen, scroll down. First Select Add User Defined Output. 
4 

7. Then select an Output when it populates into the list.

8. Enter N/A into narrative fields, zero into the target field, and select a method from the 

dropdown menu. Then select the Outcome button. Repeat the Output steps for the Outcome. 
5 

9. Add 1 to the # of Volunteers and # of Project Hours fields.

10. Click Complete PM button.
6 

11. Click Next. Then Click Validate Performance Measures.

12. Click Back to eGrants application.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Analogic Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael L.
Levitz, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: March 11, 2010



| |  |  |  |                                                       
| |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | /s/ Michael L. Levitz                                 
| |  |  |  |                                                       
| |  |  |  | Michael L. Levitz                                     
| |  |  |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
| |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 619 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 619

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to prohibit discrimination on the 
    basis of sex in programs receiving Federal financial assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 1999

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to prohibit discrimination on the 
    basis of sex in programs receiving Federal financial assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 601 of the 
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) is amended by inserting 
``sex,'' after ``color,''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-62334-CIV-RUIZ/STRAUSS

ADIDAS AG, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

THE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS ENTITIES, 

AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A,”

Defendants.

/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify and declare that I am over the age of 18 years, employed in the county of 

Broward, and I am an attorney for Plaintiffs, adidas AG, adidas International Marketing B.V., 

and adidas America, Inc., in the above captioned action.

On January 3, 2023, Stephen M. Gaffigan, P.A. posted copies of the following 

document(s) on the website http://servingnotice.com/Da29d1x/index.html, in compliance with 

this Court’s Order dated December 21, 2022: 

1. Complaint

2. Civil Cover Sheet

3. Clerk’s Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz II

4. AO-120 Form

5. Corporate Disclosure Statement

6. Motion to File Under Seal

7. Proposed Order Granting Motion to Seal

Case 0:22-cv-62334-RAR Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2023 Page 1 of 3
8. Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application for Entry of Temporary Restraining Order, 

Preliminary Injunction, and Order Restraining Transfer of Assets and 

Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof (“Ex Parte Application for TRO”)

9. Declaration of Virgilio Gigante in Support of Ex Parte Application for TRO

10. Declaration of Mia Nidia Gutierrez in Support of Ex Parte Application for TRO

11. Declaration of Kathleen Burns in Support of Ex Parte Application for TRO, 

together with supporting exhibit

12. Proposed Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order and Setting Preliminary 

Injunction Hearing

13. Ex Parte Motion for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of Process on 

Defendants Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3)

14. Declaration of Virgilio Gigante in Support of Ex Parte Motion for Order 

Authorizing Alternate Service of Process on Defendants, together with supporting 

exhibit

15. Proposed Order Granting Motion for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of 

Process on Defendants

16. Order Granting Motion to File Under Seal

17. Order Granting Motion for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of Process on 

Defendant Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3)

18. Order Granting Ex Parte Application for Entry of Temporary Restraining Order 

and Setting Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction

19. Notice of Filing Bond

Case 0:22-cv-62334-RAR Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2023 Page 2 of 3
Dated: January 5, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

STEPHEN M. GAFFIGAN, P.A.

By: s:/Stephen M. Gaffigan/

Stephen M. Gaffigan (Fla. Bar No. 025844)

Virgilio Gigante (Fla. Bar No. 082635)

T. Raquel Wiborg-Rodriguez(Fla. Bar. No. 103372)

401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 130-453

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Telephone: (954) 767-4819

E-mail: Stephen@smgpa.cloud

E-mail: Leo@smgpa.cloud

E-mail: Raquel@smgpa.cloud

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 0:22-cv-62334-RAR Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2023 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit13.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form20-F of Stena AB (publ) (the "Company") forthe year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Dan Sten Olsson, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Svante Carlsson, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

/s/ Dan StenOlsson                 Name: Dan Sten OlssonTitle: Chief Executive Officer Date: June 14, 2004

/s/ SvanteCarlsson                 Name: Svante CarlssonTitle: Chief Financial Officer Date: June 14, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filedby the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 24.3

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director
or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and
each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

                                         /s/ James C. Crews
                                         ------------------
                                         James C. Crews
No. 10-11010.

#### Martinez-Ruiz *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Final General Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, 
Whitman Mission National Historic Site, Washington

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Impact Statement 
(FEIS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of 
a Final General Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (GMP/
EIS) for Whitman Mission National Historic Site, Washington. The final 
GMP/EIS presents the proposed action for management of the historic 
site for the next 15 years. The proposed action best satisfies the 
historic site and NPS mission, as well as the site's long-term 
management objectives.
    Approximately 250 copies of the draft GMP/EIS were distributed to 
the public. Two public workshops on the draft were held in Walla Walla, 
WA, and Mission, OR. The Environmental Protection Agency's notice of 
availability published in the Federal Register started the review and 
comment period on September 3, 1999. All comments received at the park 
by November 26, 1999, were reviewed and considered by the NPS in the 
preparation of the final GMP/EIS.
    This document is in an abbreviated format and contains a series of 
corrections and revisions describing changes to the text of the draft, 
copies of substantive comment letters received from all agencies and 
organizations, and responses to all substantive comments. Readers may 
find it convenient to refer to the draft GMP/EIS while reviewing this 
abbreviated final document.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The no-action period on this final GMP/EIS 
will expire 30 days after the Environmental Protection Agency has 
accepted the document and published a notice of availability in the 
Federal Register. Following the no-action period, a record of decision 
to implement the proposed action will be signed. All who submitted 
substantive comments on the draft GMP/EIS will receive a copy of the 
final. In addition, the document has been placed on the NPS website at 
www.nps.gov/whmi/gmp.htm. Public reading copies of the final GMP/EIS 
will be available for review at the following locations: Office of 
Public Affairs, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW, Washington, DC 
20240; Whitman Mission National Historic Site headquarters, 328 Whitman 
Mission Rd., Walla Walla, WA 99362, and at public libraries in the 
Walla Walla area.

    Dated: June 8, 2000.
William C. Walters,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 00-15456 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P