alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 105-50.001-5 Specialized or technical services.

*Specialized or technical services* means statistical and other studies and compilations, development projects, technical tests and evaluations, technical information, training activities, surveys, reports, documents, and any other similar service functions which any department or agency of the executive branch of the Federal Government is especially equipped and authorized by law to perform.
No. 10-10901.

#### Cuong Phan *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 172-23   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 172-23   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 2 of 2
#### § 101-26.803-1 Reporting discrepancies or deficiencies.

Discrepancies or deficiencies in shipments or material occur in four broad categories: Quality deficiencies, shipping discrepancies, transportation discrepancies, and billing discrepancies. When discrepancies or deficiencies occur, activities shall document them with sufficient information to enable initiation and processing of claims against suppliers and carriers. Procedures for documenting discrepancies or deficiencies are set forth in the GSA publication, Discrepancies or Deficiencies in GSA or DOD Shipments, Material, or Billings, issued by the Federal Supply Service, GSA. Copies of the publication may be obtained by submitting a completed GSA Form 457, FSS Publications Mailing List Application, (referencing mailing list code number ODDH-0001) to the following address: General Services Administration, Centralized Mailing List Service (CMLS-C), 819 Taylor Street, P.O. Box 17077, Fort Worth, TX 76102-0077.

Note:

Copies of the GSA Form 457 may be obtained by writing the Centralized Mailing List Service.

[[55 FR 24086](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/55-FR-24086), June 14, 1990]
§ 302-17.33 May I ask my agency to recalculate my RITA? ( a ) Yes, you may ask your agency to recalculate your RITA provided you filed your “Statement of Income and Tax Filing Status,” and amended it, if necessary, in a timely manner. If, once you have completed all Federal, state, and local tax returns, you believe that your RITA should have been significantly different from the RITA that your agency calculated, you may ask your agency to recalculate your RITA. This is true for either the one-year or two-year process. With any request for recalculation, you must submit a statement explaining why you believe your RITA was incorrect.
( b ) Please note that your agency may require that you also submit an amended “Statement of Income and Tax Filing Status” (if, for example, you inadvertently did not report some of your income in your original Statement), your actual tax returns, or both, as attachments to your request for recalculation.
Note to § 302-17.33 :
Please see § 302-17.55, if your agency uses a one-year RITA process, or § 302-17.68, if your agency uses a two-year RITA process, for more information about positive and negative RITA calculations.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7821

EDWIN CHRISTOPHER LAWING,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CARLOS HERNANDEZ, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:19-hc-02258-D)

Submitted: February 28, 2022 Decided: March 30, 2022

Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edwin Christopher Lawing, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Porter Babb, Sr., Special Deputy 

Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Edwin Christopher Lawing seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief 

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lawing has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
No. 11-9212.

#### Ibarra-Pino *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-8693.

#### Alexander *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 10-11090.

#### Nardelli *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
020P15

#### State v. Susan Denise Shaw

1. Defs Motion for Temporary Stay (COA14-124)

1. Allowed 01/15/15

Dissolved 04/09/2015

2. Defs Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Denied

3. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Denied
#### § 105-50.304a Deposits.

Reimbursements to GSA for furnishing special or technical services to State and local units of government will be deposited to the credit of the appropriation from which the cost of providing such services has been paid or is to be charged if such reimbursements are authorized. Otherwise, the reimbursements will be credited to miscellaneous receipts in the U.S. Treasury (42 U.S.C. 4223).
#### Simon Simpson v. Louis Stein.

Petition in Eeboe —■ *Record*— Nothing *to Review.*Where the record does not show any final disposition of the case, and the only allegation in the petition in error is “that the district court erred in overruling the motion of the defendant below to quash the summons and dismiss the action,” there is nothing presented for the supreme court to review.

*Error from Cloud District Court.*

The opinion states the case.

*L. J. Crans,*for plaintiff in error.

*Kennett & Peck,*for defendant in error.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

The only allegation in the petition in error filed in this court is that “the district court erred in overruling the motion of the defendant below to quash the summons and dismiss the action.” The record does not show any final disposition of the case; therefore there is nothing presented for this court to review. *(Brown v. Kimble,*5 Kas. 80; *Dolbee v. Hoover,*8 id. 124; *Snavely v. Buggy Co.,*36 id. 106; *Burch v. Adams,*40 id. 639.)

All the Justices concurring.
#### § 302-12.119 Under a home sale program, may we pay an employee for losses the employee incurs on the sale of a residence?

No, under a home sale program, you may not pay an employee for losses the employee incurs on the sale of a residence, but this does not preclude you reimbursing a relocation services company for losses incurred while the contractor holds the property.

[FTR Case 2022-05, 89 FR 12256, Feb. 16, 2024]
# Comments on: 20-1268: SHUFORD v. WILKIE [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 655 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 655

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exclude clinical 
social worker services from coverage under the Medicare skilled nursing 
                  facility prospective payment system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1999

Mr. Stark (for himself, Mr. Leach, Mr. Towns, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Bentsen, 
Mr. Meehan, Mr. Waxman, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
 Weygand, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Frost, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. 
 Brown of Ohio, Mr. DeFazio, Ms. Kilpatrick, Ms. Rivers, Mr. Sanders, 
 Mr. Bonior, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Strickland, 
  and Mr. George Miller of California) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition 
     to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exclude clinical 
social worker services from coverage under the Medicare skilled nursing 
                  facility prospective payment system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Social Work Equity Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUDING CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER SERVICES FROM COVERAGE UNDER 
              THE MEDICARE SKILLED NURSING FACILITY PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT 
              SYSTEM AND CONSOLIDATED PAYMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 1888(e)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395yy(e)(2)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting ``clinical 
social worker services,'' after ``qualified psychologist services,''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1861(hh)(2) of such Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(hh)(2)) is amended by striking ``and other than services 
furnished to an inpatient of a skilled nursing facility which the 
facility is required to provide as a requirement for participation''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section apply as 
if included in the enactment of section 4432(a) of the Balanced Budget 
Act of 1997.
                                 <all>
```
§ 105-54.103 Policy. The basic GSA policy on committee management is as follows: ( a ) Advisory committees will be formed or used by GSA only when specifically authorized by law, or by the President, or specifically determined as a matter of formal record by the Administrator of General Services to be in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on GSA by law;
( b ) Advisory committees will not be used to administer a function that is the assigned responsibility of a service or staff office;
( c ) The assigned responsibility of a GSA official may not be delegated to any committee;
( d ) No advisory committee may be used for functions that are not solely advisory unless specifically authorized by statute or Presidential directive. Making policy decisions and determining action to be taken with respect to any matter considered by an advisory committee is solely the responsibility of GSA; and
( e ) In carrying out its responsibilities, GSA will consult with and obtain the advice of interested groups substantially affected by its programs. The use of advisory committees for this purpose is considered to be in the public interest and necessary for the proper performance by GSA of its assigned functions.
§ 102-75.30 What are disposal agencies' responsibilities concerning the utilization of excess property? Disposal agencies' responsibilities concerning the utilization of excess property are to— ( a ) Provide for the transfer of excess real property among Federal agencies, to mixed-ownership Government corporations, and to the municipal government of the District of Columbia; and
( b ) Resolve conflicting requests for transferring real property that the involved agencies cannot resolve.
#### Eva D. Clark, appellant v. Town of Salix, appellee.

No. 49258.

(Reported in 85 N.W.2d 830)

October 15, 1957.

McCormick & McCormick, of Sioux City, for appellant.

Wm. A. Shuminsky, of Sioux City, for appellee.

Oliver, J.

This is a companion case to No. 49257, Harrington v. Town of Salix, 248 Iowa 1359, 85 N.W.2d 527. The questions of fact and law, material to each appeal, are the same. For the reasons stated in the Harrington case the order of the trial court herein is affirmed. — Affirmed.

Hays, C. J., and Bliss, Oareield, Smith, Thompson, Larson, and Peterson, JJ., concur.

Wbnnerstrum, J.,

dissents — I dissent for the reasons stated in Harrington v. Town of Salix.
§ 300-70.103 Are there any exceptions to the first class and business class reporting requirement? Yes. You must not report data that is protected from public disclosure by statute or Executive Order, such as classified data or data otherwise withheld from the public in response to written requests under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). In these cases, you are required to report the following aggregate information: ( a ) Aggregate number of authorized first class and business class trips that are protected from disclosure;
( b ) Total cost of actual first class and business class fares paid that exceeded the coach class fare; and
( c ) Total cost of coach class fares that would have been paid for the same travel.
Note to § 300-70.103 :
If the aggregate information is also protected from public disclosure then a negative report must be submitted to GSA.
[FTR Amdt. 2009-06, 74 FR 55146, Oct. 27, 2009, as amended by FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55702, Sept. 12, 2022]
No. 11-9157.

#### Ross *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT  REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.'s 333-52704, 333-52716,
333-59795 and 333-29745) and Form S-3 (No.'s 333-87103, 333-68197, 333-52971, and 333-47777) of Daou
Systems, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2005, except for the seventh and eighth paragraphs of Note 8 and Note 14, as to which the date is August 11, 2005 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Daou Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
August 11, 2005 |  | /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------

---



QuickLinks
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 1:22-cv-23174-RKA Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2022 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23174-RKA Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2022 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39608-39609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-16141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR00-18-000]


Great Lakes Energy Partners, L.L.C.; Notice of Petition for Rate 
Approval

June 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 19, 2000, Great Lakes Energy Partners, 
L.L.C. (GLEP) filed, pursuant to Section 284.123(b)(2) of the 
Commission's Regulations, a petition for rate approval requesting that 
the Commission approve a system-wide maximum rate of 71.4 cents per 
MMBtu applicable to interruptible transportation service rendered on 
its system in the State of Pennsylvania. GLEP states that this rate 
will be applicable to the transportation of natural gas under Section 
311(a)(2) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA).
    Pursuant to Section 284.123(b)(2)(ii), if the Commission does not 
act within 150 days of this filing the rates will be deemed to be fair 
and equitable and not to excess of an amount which interstate pipelines 
would be permitted to charge for similar transportation service. The 
Commission may within such 150 day period extend the time for action or 
institute a proceeding in which all interested parties will be afforded 
an opportunity for written comments and the oral presentation of views, 
data and arguments.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All motions must be filed 
with the Secretary of the Commission on or before July 5, 2000. This 
petition for rate approval is on file with the Commission and is 
available for public inspection. This filing may be viewed on the web

[[Page 39609]]

at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16141 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 302-2.17 Must I sign a service agreement for a “last move home” relocation or separation from Government service?

No, you do not need to sign a service agreement for a “last move home” relocation or separation from Government service.

[86 FR 73680, Dec. 28, 2021]
#### § 102-74.435 What is the policy concerning explosives on Federal property?

No person entering or while on Federal property may carry or possess explosives, or items intended to be used to fabricate an explosive or incendiary device, either openly or concealed, except for official purposes.
# Comments on: 20-2090: STRAW v. WILKIE [OPINION], Nonprecedential
#### § 109-27.5101 Definition.

*Precious metals* means uncommon and highly valuable metals characterized by their superior resistance to corrosion and oxidation. Included are gold, silver, and the platinum group metals—platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium, ruthenium and osmium.
§ 301-11.15 What expenses may be considered part of the daily lodging cost when I rent on a long-term basis? When you rent a room, apartment, house, or other lodging on a long-term basis (e.g., weekly, monthly), the following expenses may be considered part of the lodging cost: ( a ) The rental cost for a furnished dwelling; if unfurnished, the rental cost of the dwelling and the rental cost of appropriate and necessary furniture and appliances (e.g., stove, refrigerator, chairs, tables, bed, sofa, television, or vacuum cleaner);
( b ) Cost of connecting/disconnecting and using utilities;
( c ) Cost of reasonable maid fees and cleaning charges;
( d ) Monthly telephone use fee (does not include installation and long-distance calls); and,
( e ) If ordinarily included in the price of a hotel/motel room in the area concerned, the cost of special user fees (e.g., cable TV charges and plug-in charges for automobile head bolt heaters).
[FTR Amdt. 70, 63 FR 15961, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended by FTR Amdt. 2007-05, 72 FR 61537, Oct. 31, 2007]
#### § 102-5.25 What additional guidance concerning home-to-work transportation should Federal agencies issue?

Each Federal agency using Government passenger carriers to provide home-to-work transportation for employees who are essential for the safe and efficient performance of intelligence, counterintelligence, protective services, or criminal law enforcement duties should issue guidance concerning such use.