## Information Collection Request **Supporting Statement for the 8**  **- hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard** 

**Implementation Rule (Renewal)**  **EPA ICR # 2236.0**  **4**

**Prepared by: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards**  **Office of Air and Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency**  **Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711**

**Ju ly**  **16 ,**  **201 3** 

**EPA Information Collection Request for the 1997**  **8 -**  **hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard**

**Im plementation Rule** 

## Table of Contents

1. Id entification of the Renewal Information Collection Request.........page 1
2. Need for and Use of the Collection..........................................page 3
3. Non - Duplication, Consultation, and other Collection Criteria......... page 4
4. Respondents and the Information Requested........................ ......page 8

5. In formation Collected

—Agency

Activities, Collection Methodology and Information Mana gement................................................ ............... .....page 1 2
6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection........................page 1 41



### 1. **Identification of the Information Collection Request 1(a)**  **Title of the Information Collection** The title of the Information Collection Request is 8
- hour Ozone Nation al Ambient Air Quality Standard Implementation R ule (Renewal) , Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) number 2236.0 4 , Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number 2060
- 0594 . **1(b) Abstract/Executive Summary**  The Paperwork Reduction Act requires the information found in this Information Collection Request (I CR) number 2236. 0 4 , to assess the burden (in hours and dollars) of the renewal of the 1997 8 - hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Implementation Rule as well as the periodic reporting and record keeping necessary to maintain the rule. The rule was proposed June 2, 2003 (68 FR 32802) and promulgated in two Phases: Phase 1 published April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23951) and Phase 2 published N ovember 29, 2005 (70 FR 71612) . The preamble to the proposed and final regulation addressed the administrative burden in general terms. The preamble to the final Phase 2 rule stated that an ICR would be prepared (70 FR at 71692). In 2007 , certain limited p ortions of the Phase 1 rule were vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The EPA addressed a portion of the vacature b y assigning areas originally designated under subpart 1, part D, title Iof the CAA to be subject to su bpart 2. The f

ormer s ubpart 1 areas with non
- attainment designation status were assigned to s ubpart 2 Marginal or Moderate classifications . The s ubpart 2 classifications were published in the EPA’s Final Rule to Implement the 1997 8
- Hour Ozone NAAQS: Class ification of Areas That Were Initiall y Classified Under S ubpart 1; Revision of the Anti
- Backsliding Provisions To Address 1 - Hour Contingency

Measure Requirements; Deletion of Obsolete 1
- Hour Ozone Standard Provision. See 77 FR 28 4 2 3, May 14 , 2012 . 1 The time period covered in this I CR is a three ye ar period from August 1, 201 3 through July 3 1 , 20 1 6 . The milestones include the attainment demonstration, Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission, and the Reasonable Available Control Technology

(RACT) SIP submission. However, not all of the milestones and associated burd en and administrative cost estimates apply to the remaining attainment areas for the 1997 8 - hour Ozone NAAQS. There are thirty
- eight non - attainment areas within sixteen states and the District of Columbia . Thirty
- two of the thirty
- eight non - attainment are as have no additional burden as they either have completed their SIP requirements or the SIP requirement s have been suspended . The following paragraphs explain the status of certain affected non
- attainment areas and either the estimated burdens for certai n non - attainment areas.

 **Status of ozone non -**  **attainment areas anticipated to have no additional burden** . The EPA recognizes that there are certain categories of ozone non
- attainment areas

1 Correction notice published July 25, 2012 (77 FR 43521).2 that will have no additional burden in this I CR . These areas include o nes that have met their 1997 ozone NAAQS SIP requirements either through a Determination of Attainment or through SIP requirements that have been suspended b y a Clean Data Determination issued b y the EPA.

 **Status of ozone non -**  **attainment areas ini**  **ti ally**  **des ignated**  **under s**  **ubpart 1 and that have been redesignated as Moderate under**  **s ubpart 2 in the 2010**  **redesignation action that are estimated to have no additional burden.** The EPA’s final rule of May

14, 2012, (77 FR 28423) , mentioned above, designated 16 non attainment areas under s ubpart 2. Nine of the former subpart 1 areas were classified as Marginal non - attainment areas . These nine Marginal areas have either met the NAAQS standard or have their SIP requirements suspended. There are s even former sub part 1 areas classified as Moderate that require the state to prepare and submit to the EPA an attainment demonstration, RFP , and RACT SIP submission s between the calendar years of 2013 to 2016. The EPA has determined that three of the seven non attainment areas would have no additional new burden . The se three areas ozone non attainment areas , the Pittsburgh area , PA , the Buffalo area, NY and the Jamestown area , NY are all within the OTR . Because of OTR requirements, these state s have already submitted state - wide RACT SIP requirement s . The se three areas also have EPA - approved Clean Data Determinations that suspend the attainment demonstration and RFP planning requirement resulting in no additional estimated burden .  **Status of ozone non -**  **attainment areas anticipated to have additional burden.**  **The EPA has determined that ozone non**  **- attainment areas that were initially**  **designated under s**  **ubpart 1 and that have been redesignated under s**  **ubpart 2 with a Moderate classification**  **in the 201 2**  **redesignation action wi ll have an**  **increase in burden.** As stated in the previous item, there are s even 8 - hour ozone non - attainment areas that would normally have to prepare and submit to the EPA an attainment demonstration and RFP planning requirement resulting in no additional b urden of which three have no additional burden. The remaining four non
- attainment areas have completed a majority of the SIP requirements but due to the subpart 2 reclassification, the areas must address additional SIP requirements such as RACT SIPs . This requirement to submit RACT SIPs represents an increased burden estimated to be about 2,500 hours, approximately half of the required 5,000 hours the EPA has estimated for areas submitting complete Moderate SIP requirements. The four impacted ozone non attainment areas are in California and are as follows: o Calaveras County (formerly part of Central Mountain Counties) o Kern County

(Eastern Kern) o Mariposa County

(formerly

part of Southern Mountain Counties) o Western Nevada County

 **Areas that may be anticipated to or have missed their attainment date**  **.** There are two areas that are anticipated to miss their June 15, 2013 Serious classification attainment date. The EPA believes it is essential to estimate the burden these two areas may encounter. Ty

pical ly , the EPA has provided an estimated 20,000 burden3 hours for Serious areas to develop the complete necessary Serious area SIP submissions. However, i n th is case, the EPA must recognize that a majority of the burden is reduced since the areas have complete d a majority of the required SIP submissions. Accordingly , the EPA has reduced the burden for each of these areas to 5,000 hours as deemed necessary to complete their SIP revisions to their attainment demonstrations. The two areas are: o Baltimore Area, Maryland o Dallas
- Fort Worth Area, Texas The EPA has estimated that in total six non
- attainment areas will have additional burden in fulfilling their obligations during the time period covered b y this ICR renewal. The EPA anticipates additional administrative burden for state governments and the EPA of 20,000 hours and 1,100 hours, respectively . Fift y percent of the hours are expended in the 1 st year with the remainder evenly divided between the 2 nd and 3 rd ye ars of the IC R period. Tribes are not required to conduct attainment demonstrations or submit RFP or RACT SIPs. The present value of the total additional costs for state governments, the respondents, is estimated at $ 1. 4 million for the 3 ye ar period . On an equivalent annual basis that is $ 434 ,0 0 0 per ye ar during the 3 year period of the ICR. The present value of the EPA’s administrative cost burden is estimated at $ 156,466 dollars. This is equivalent to an equal annual stream of costs of $ 52 , 155 per ye ar during the three ye ar period. 

### 2. **Need For and Use of the Collection 2(a)**  **Need/Authority for the Collection** Part D of Title I of the Clean Air Act sets forth the plan (implementation) requirements for areas designated non
- attainment with a promulgate d National Ambient Air Quality Standard. When the Clean Air Act amendments of 1990 were enacted, the s ubpart 2 provisions were specific to designated non
- attainment areas for the 1
- hour o zone NAAQS, but that standard was revised in 199 7. As a result of litigation and subsequent court decisions, the implementation r ule for the 1997 8 - hour ozone NAAQS was issued in two phases: Phase 1 was published April 30, 2004 and Phase 2 was published November 29, 2005. When the review and comment periods on the draft and final federal implementation rules closed, the affected parties could begin to assess the milestones and begin the planning process . In2007 Phase I was vacated and all areas designated under “ s ubpart 1” areas were redesignated in 2009 as either s ubpart 2 Marginal or s ubpart 2 Moderate areas. This I CR is the second 3
- ye ar renewal of the original I CR developed in response to the implementation framework to fulfill requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act.4

**2( b**  **) User/Users of the Data**  **2** The data collected from respondents include attainment demonstrations, RFP SIP submissions, and RACT SIP submissions. The attainment demonstrations indicate the emission reductions that are necessary to attain and maintain the 1997 o zone NAAQS. The RFP SIP describes how the RFP obligation will be met by the affected non
- attainment areas as emission reductions are phased in over time. The RACT SIP provides an assessment of present controls on affected sources of emissions to see if they meet RACT requirement s and identifies where additional measures and emission reduction requirements are required. T he RACT and RFP requirements together can be used to satisfy the emission reduction requirements to attain and maintain the 1997 o zone NAAQS. The states use th e attainment demonstrations, RFP SIP submissions, and RACT SIP submissions to inform their citizenry , including potentially regulated entities regarding the progress achieved in implementing the NAAQS . They also use this information and anal ys is to fulfill federal obligations under Title I, s ubpart D of the Clean Air Act and Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the 1997 8 - hour Ozone Implementation Rule. The potentially

regulated entities use this information in assessing future emission reduction requirements. The regional and headquarters offices of the EPA use the information as part of their review of attainment demonstration, RFP SIP, and RACT SIP adequacy . Emission reducing regulations developed b y the states and approved by the EPA are federall y enforceable. 

### 3. **Non -**  **Duplication, Consultation, and Other Collection Criteria 3(a)**  **Non -**  **Duplication** There are 3 parts to the information collection for this I CR: the attainment demonstration, the RFP SIP submission, and the RACT SIP submission. **Attainment Demonstration.**  The attainment demonstration requirement appears as 40 CFR 51.908 which implements Clean Air Act subsections 172(c)(1), 182(b)(1)(A), and 182(c)(2)(B). The attainment demonstration for the 8
- hour Ozone NAAQS is unique and does not duplicate other implementation plan requirements. However, the states are encouraged to build upon related implementation planning processes they used for the 1
- hour Ozone NAAQS, regional haze rule, and/or PM 2.5 NAAQS. Taking such steps, where appropriate, may

redu ce the incremental administrative burden and enable identification of control strategies that achieve requisite multi
- pollutant environmental progress at a lower cost.

2 Attainment demonstrations as well as RFP and RACT SIP submissions are vie wed as analytical products to some; but are regulations to others. In the context of the Pa perwork Reduction Act, the attainment demonstration and RFP and RACT SIP submissions are considered data.5

**RFP SIP Submission.** This unique requirement is described in 40 CFR 51.910. Although th e RFP submission does not duplicate other plan requirements, the RFP submission may complement them. For example, the emission reductions associated with the RFP SIP may be sufficient to bring the area into attainment . The states are encouraged to build upon related analy ses for federal emission reducing rules as well as salient PM NAAQS and regional haze implementation requirements where appropriate. Taking such steps may reduce the incremental administrative burden. For example, the temporal and spatia l nature of emission reductions associated with the federal rules may be sufficient to meet the RFP requirements. Hence, the need to identify additional emission reductions to meet RFP requirements may be mitigated in some instances. In addition, states are encouraged, where appropriate, to take into account similar anal ys es and planning efforts to meet certain PM NAAQS and regional haze implementation requirements. Such actions may result in RFP plans which achieve requisite multi
- pollutant environmental progress at a lower cost. **RACT SIP Submission.** This unique requirement is described in 40 CFR 51.912 which implements CAA subsections 172(c)(1) 182(b)(2),(c),(d), and (e). But, it is related to the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirement for the regional haze rule and RACT requirements for the PM 2.5 NAAQS implementation rule. The states are encouraged to take into account these related requirements and anal ys es where appropriate. Taking such steps can reduce administrative burden and fos ter achievement of multi
- pollutant environmental progress at a lower cost. There are other activities covered b y existing I CRs which complement the activities required for the attainment demonstration, RFP SIP submission, and RACT SIP submission. One example is the Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule. Salient ICRs and their titles are identified below.

 Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans o 51.121 - 51.122 NOx SIP Call 2060 - 0445 o 51.160 - 51.166 New Source Review 2060 - 0003 o 51.321 - 51.323 Air Quality Data Reporting 2060 - 0088 o 51.353 - 51.354 Inspection/Maintenance 2060 - 0252 o 51.365 - 51.366 Inspection/Maintenance 2060 - 0252  Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans o 52.21 Prevention of Significant Deterioration 2060 - 0003  Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Meth ods o 53.4 2080 - 0005 o 53.9(f),(h),(i) 2080 - 0005 o 53.14 2080 - 0005 o 53.15 2080 - 0005 o 53.16(a)
- (d),(f) 2080 - 0005  Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations o 55.4 - 55.8 2060 - 02496 o 55.11 - 55.14 2060 - 0249  Ambient Air Quality

Surv eillance o 58.11 - 58.14 2060 - 0084 o 58.20 - 58.23 2060 - 0084 o 58.25 - 58.28 2060 - 0084 o 58.30 - 58.31 2060 - 0084 o 58.33 2060 - 0084 o 58.35 2060 - 0084 o 58.40 - 58.41 2060 - 0084 o 58.43 2060 - 0084 o 58.45 2060 - 0084 o 58.50 2060 - 0084  Determining Conformity of Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans o 91.150 - 93.160 2060 - 0279 **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to the Office of** 

**Management and Budget (OMB)** On April 8, 2010, the EPA publish ed a notice announcing its intention to submit this I CR to the Office of Management and Budget and the availability of the draft supporting statement . In that announcement, the EPA sought public comments . At the end of the 3 0 - day comment period, the EPA ha d received no public comments. **3(c) Consultation**  **and Comment** The preamble for the final 1997 8 - hour o zone NAAQS Phase 2 implementation rule stated that an ICR would be prepared. The EPA published a Federal Register notice on November 15, 2006 (Volume 71 , Number 220 Page 66515) that solicited comment on the Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; 8
- Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Implementation Rule; EPA ICR No. 2236.02, OMB Control No. 2060

– 0594. At this time, a second 3
- ye ar renewal of the ICR is required. To renew the information collection activities, the EPA published a Federal Register notice on [I

NSERT DATE OF FR PUBLICATION ( FR VOLUME , NUMBER AND FR PAGE NUMBER) that solicited comment on the Agency Information Collection Activities, Renewal, Comment Request; 1997 8 - Hour Ozone NAAQS Rule, EPA I CR 2236.0 4 , OMB Control no. 2060
- 0594. The comment period closed on [I NSERT DATE] with the EPA receiving no comments. **3( d**  **) Effects of Collection**  The collections under 40 CFR 51.908, 51.910, and 51.912 are necessary to provide assurances that identified level of emission reductions are adequate to ensure timely attainment and maintenance of the 1997 Ozone NAAQS while adhering to the mandatory measures and requirements for s ubpart 2 non - attainment areas, as well as former s ubpart 1 areas.7

**3( e**  **) General Guidelines**  This I CR adheres to the guidelines stated in the 1995 Paperwork Reduction Act, the OMB ’ s implementing regulations, the EPA ’ s In formation Collection Request Handbook , and other applicable OMB guidance. The final 8
- hour Ozone NAAQS implementation rule does not require:  reporting more than once a year;  respondents to participate in a statistical survey ;  responses to Agency

inquiries in less than 30 days;  respondents to receive remuneration for preparation of reports;  records to be kept more than 3 years, 3 and,  manual methods of reporting. 4 **3( f**  **) Confidentiality**  The information is requested from the states. To fulfill the attainment demonstration, RFP SIP submission, and RACT SIP submission requirements, the states will use emissions levels and control efficiency

data provided by

certain facilities in the private and public sector. This infor mation is available from a variety of sources. It is the assimilation and anal ys is of that data that is required in the attainment demonstration, RFP SIP submittal, and the RACT SIP submittal. There are 2 non - attainment areas that must revise their attai nment demonstration s and 4 areas that must prepare and submit RACT SIP revisions . The remaining non - attainment areas have met or suspended their SIP requirements before the time period covered by this ICR begins and will thus only need to prepare recordkeeping reports . States should already have information from emission sources, as facilities should have provided this information to meet 1997 8 - hour ozone SIP requirements and previous 1 - hour SIP requirements, operating permits, and/or emissions reporting requirements. Such information does not generall y reveal the details of production processes. But, to the extent it may , the affected facilities are protected. Specificall y, the completion of the emissions and control efficiency information that is confidential, proprietary , and trade secret is protected from disclosure under the requirements of subsections 503(e) and 114 (c) of the Clean Air Act. **3( g**  **) Sensitive Information**  The requested attainment demonstration, RFP SIP submission, and RACT SIP submission do not include questions whose answers would require sensitive information. 

### 4.0 **Respondents and the Information Requested**

3 However, the states may choose to retain the information for more than 3 years. 4 However, the states must still submit their attainment demonstrati on, RFP SIP, and RACT SIP.8

**4(a) Respondents and the Non**  **- Attainment areas**  Table 1 lists 38 non - attainment areas in total as of July 22, 2013 . Table 2 lists the numbers of non
- attainment areas within each state and regional office. Table 3 indicates the six non
- attainment areas contained within three states and regional offices affected by the attainment demonstration, RFP SIP, and RACT SIP submission. Lo cal, state, and federal agencies are part of the North American Industrial Classification Sy stem code number 924110. 5 There are other entities that may be indirectl y affected, as they may comment on the draft submissions before they

are forwarded to th e EPA’s Regional Offices. These include potentially

regulated entities, representatives of special interest groups, and individuals. Consideration of the burden on these entities is beyond the scope of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

5 http://www.census.gov/naics Code number 924110 includes “administration of air & water resources & solid wa ste management programs9

**Table 1. Classifica tions of 8**  **- Hour Ozone Non**  **- attainment Area**  **s As of July 22, 2013 (see http://www.epa.gov/air/oaqps/greenbk/gnc.html)**  n = area has whole or part county or counties in a previous 1 - hr Ozone nonattainment area (as of June 15, 2005) no longer subject to the 1 - hour standard m = area has whole or part county or counties in a previous 1 - hr Ozone maintenance area (as of June 15, 2005) no longer subject to the 1 - hour standard * = area has whole or part county or counties in a CO, PM - 10, or PM - 2.5 nonattainment o r ma intenance area or previous 1 - hr Ozone nonattainment or maintenance area (as of June 15, 2005) **Category/Classification (Attainment Date)** 

---------------------------------------------------------- **EXTREME ( June 20**  **3 1**  **)** Los Angeles - South Coast Air Basin Area , CA [ **n** ***** ] San Joaquin Valley Area, CA [ **n** ***** ] **SEVERE 17 ( June 2021**  **) SEVERE 15**  **(June 2019)** Houston - Galveston - Brazoria Area , TX [ **n** ***** ] Los Angeles and San Bernardino Cos (W Mojave Desert) Area, CA [ **n** ***** ] Riverside County ( Coachella Valley) Area, CA [ **n** ***** ] Sacramento Metro Area, CA [ **n** ***** ] **SERIOUS ( June 2013**  **)** Baltimore Area, MD [ **n** ***** ] Dallas - Fort Worth Area, TX [ **n** ***** ] Ventura County (part) Area, CA [ **n** ***** ] **MODERATE ( June 2010**  **)** Amador and Calaveras Counties (Central Mountain Counties) Area, CA [ **n** ***** ] Atlanta, GA [ **n** ***** ] Boston - Lawrence - Worcester (E. MA) [ **n** ***** ] Buffalo - Niagara Falls Area, NY [ **n** ***** ] Charlotte - Gastonia - Rock Hill, NC - SC (NC portion) [ **n** ***** ] Greater Connecticut, CT [ **n** ***** ] Imperial County, CA [ **n** ***** ] Jamestown Area, NY [ **n** ***** ] Jefferson County , NY [ **n** ***** ] Kern County (Eastern Kern) Area, CA [ **m** ***** ] Mariposa and Tuolumne Cos (Southern Mountain Counties) Area, CA Nevada County (Western part) Area, CA New York - N. New Jersey - Long Island Area, CT - NJ - NY [ **n** ***** ] Philadelphia - Wilmington - Atlantic City Area, DE - MD - NJ - PA [ **n** ***** ] Pittsburgh - Beaver Valley Area, PA [ **m** ***** ] Poughkeepsie Area, NY [ **n** ***** ] Providence (All RI), RI [ **n** ***** ] Sheboygan, WI [ **m** ***** ] Springfield (W. Mass) Area, MA [ **n** ***** ] St. Louis Area, IL - MO [ **m** ***** ] Washington Area, DC - MD - VA [ **n** ***** ] **MARGINAL (June 2007)**  Albany - Schenectady - Troy, NY Chico Area, CA [ **n** ***** ] Denver - Boulder - Greeley - Ft. Collins - Love. Area, CO10

Essex County (Whitefact Mtn.) Area, NY [ **n** ***** ] Phoenix - Mesa Area, AZ [ **m** ***** ] Rochester, NY [ **m** ***** ] San Francisco Bay Area, CA [ **n** ***** ] Sutter County (part) (Sutter Buttes) Area, CA [ **n** ***** ] As indicated in Table 3 , the non - attainment area segments are in three state s . Furthermore, these non
- att ainment areas are contained with in respective EPA Region s , namel y, Region 3, 6, and 9 , without encroaching into other R egion s . This would not increase the administrative burden of the RACT SIP submission. The numbers of non
- attainment areas or parts of areas in each state and the associated EPA Regional Off

ice are presented in Table 2. There are 3 4 non - attainment areas that overlap into more than one state which, if counted individually , would result in 4 1 total areas identified by the state where located . These were derived from the Jul y 22 , 20 13 information at: http://www.epa.gov/air/oaqps/greenbk/gncs.html .11

**Table 2. The Numbers of Non -**  **Attainm ent**  **Areas or Parts of Areas in Each State Area and**  **State No. of** 

**Areas or Parts of**  **Areas EPA** 

**Region No. of** 

**subpart 2 Marginal**  **Areas No. of** 

**s ubpart 2**  **Moderate Areas**  **No. of**

**s ubpart 2**  **Serious Areas**  **No. of**

**s ubpart 2**  **Severe -**  **15 Areas**  **No. of**

**s ubpart 2**  **Extreme Area**  **s** Arizona 1 9 1 0 0 0 0 California 14 9 3 5 2 2 2 Colorado 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 Connecticut 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 Delaware 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 District of Columbia 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 Georgia 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 Maryland 3 3 0 2 1 0 0 Massachusetts 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 Missouri 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 New Jersey 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 New York 5 2 1 4 0 0 0 North Carolina 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 Pennsylvania 2 4 0 2 0 0 0 Texas 2 6 0 0 1 1 0 Virginia 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 Wisconsin 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 Total 41 **6 26**  **4 3**  **2 4(b)**  **Information Requested** The information requested under this I CR is prescribed by 40 CFR 51.908 (attainment demonstration), 51.910 (RFP SIP Submission), and 51.912 (RACT SIP Submission). The implementation framework set forth in the regulation does not adopt a “one
- size
- fits all” approach to meeting the attainment demonstration or RFP and RACT SIP submissions. This additional flexibility

enables the states to customize, to the extent allowed b y the Clean Air Act, their approach to attaining and maintaining the 8
- hour Ozone NAAQS. **Data Items.** The emissions and control efficiency data required for the attainment demonstration, RFP SIP submission, and RACT SIP submission should have been collec ted as a result of reporting activities required b y other OMB approved ICRs. For example, see the IC R associated with the Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/cerr/index.html . Inaddition, air pollutant concentration data is covered already b y ICR 0940 - 22 , OMB Control Number 2060
- 0084; the New Source Review provisions are covered by ICR 1230. 2 3 , OM B Control Number 2060
- 003; and the Reformulated Gasoline Requirements are covered ICR 1951. 24 , OMB Control Number 2060
- 0277. There may

be other data that the states use. For example, states may identify economic and population growth rates, federal rules that reduce future emissions of ozone precursors, and meteorological data. These data are presentl y available. **Respondents’ Activities.** The states have compile d data, set forth the methodology , conduct ed anal ys es, develop ed initial drafts, hel d hearings, adopt ed rules, regulations, and12

programs, had discussions with the EPA ’s staff as appropriate, refine d the draft demonstration and RFP and RACT SIP submissions as appropriate, adopt ed the SIP, and forward ed that SIP to the EPA. These submitted data and activities have informed EPA’s designations for this renewal ICR. **EP A**  **’s Activities.**  The EPA staff in the regional offices may facilitate timely

receipt of the attainment demonstration, RFP SIP submission, and RACT submission by reviewing materials and answering questions from the states regarding: requirements, potential d ata sources, analy sis tools, the draft attainment demonstration and other submissions. The EPA Regional Offices will evaluate the SIP submissions and take rulemaking actions to approve or disapprove the SIP revisions. The EPA headquarters staff will fac ilitate information flow amongst the regions and states to foster timely

attainment of acceptable demonstrations and SIP submissions. **Reporting Protocols.** The dates for the submissions are set forth in the final implementation rule (40 CFR 51.508, 51.910 , and 51.912). 

### 5.0 **Information Collected**
**— Agency Activities, Collection Methodology,**  **and Information Management 5(a)**  **States, EPA Regional Offices, and EPA Headquarters Offices States:**  The states agencies’ activities include 6 :  Forecast baseline emissions, d evelop and evaluate emission reduction strategies where warranted, conduct air quality modeling to verify

maintenance and attainment of the 8
- hour Ozone NAAQS .  Calculate the emission reductions necessary to fulfill RFP requirement, determine creditable emi ssion reductions, where necessary determine additional emission reductions and compliance timing to meet RFP requirement. Draft findings, hold state hearings, make revisions as warranted. Submit RFP SIP to the appropriate EPA Regional office. Have discussions with the EPA.  Id entify

RACT applicable sources and their control measures under baseline and attainment conditions; and evaluate alternatives. Draft findings, hold state hearings, make revisions as warranted. Submit RA CT SIP to the EPA Regional Office. Have discussions with the EPA. **EPA Regional Offices.** The regional office activities include:  Answering inquiries put forth by the states.  Reviewing data, analy sis, and findings of attainment demonstration, RFP SIP and RACT SIP.  Rulemaking actions approving or disapproving the SIP submissions . 6 In some instances, there are local air pollution control districts within the states. These local agencies work in partnership with the states to facilitate accomplishment of the activities noted below .13

**EPA Headquarters.** The EPA headquarters office activities include:  Facilitating information flow and problem solving amongst the regions regarding demonstrations and submittals f rom the states .  Answering questions regarding application and interpretation of salient rule provisions. **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management**  The attainment demonstration and the RFP and RACT SIP submittals will set forth the data sources and anal yt ical methods, as well as the emission reduction and air quality improvement verification procedures. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility**  For an approved IC R, the EPA must demonstrate that it has taken all practical steps to develop separate and simplified requirements for small businesses and other small entities. See 5 CFR 1320.6(h). The 8
- hour Ozone NAAQS implementation regulation does not provide a direct administrative burden on small entities. **5(d) Collection Schedule**  During the period from August 1 , 201 3 through July 31, 201 6 , there are three sets of scheduled deliverables: attainment demonstration; RFP SIP submission; and RACT SIP submission. **Attainment Demonstration** . If the EPA takes an action to reclassify areas that might not attain by their S erious area attainment date, the demonstration submission date for the areas will be specified in the EPA action. At the time of this ICR, EPA assumes the submission due date would be prior to July

31, 2016. The attainment demonstration submission due date was June 13, 2013 for former subpart 1 re - designated as subpart 2 Moderate areas. Currently , all the former subpart 1 re
- designated as subpart Moderate areas are meeting the 1997 ozone NAAQS with a Clean Data Determination resulting in the attainment planning SIP not being required at this time. **RFP SIP Submission** . If the EPA takes an action to reclassify areas that might not attain by their Serious area attainment date, the RFP date for the areas will be specified in the EPA action. At the time of this I CR, the EPA assumes the submission due date would be prior to July 31, 2016. The RFP SIP submission due date wa s June 1 3 , 20 1 3 for former s ubpart 1 re designated as subpart 2 M oderate areas. Currently , all the former subpart 1 re
- designated as subpart 2 Moderate areas are meeting the 1997 ozone NAAQS with a Clean Data Determination resulting in the RFP planning SIP not being required at this time. **RACT SIP Submission** . T he RACT SIP subm ission due date wa s June 13, 2013 for former subpart 1 re
- designated as subpart 2 Moderate areas.14



### 6. **Estimating the Burden and Cost**  **of t he Collection**  This section provides information on the cost and hours associated with the information collection for both the respondents (the affected states) and the EPA (regional and headquarters offices). Hours and costs are presented for the activities associated with each collection item for a non - attainment area (or segment) in a given state, as well as the equivalent annual and present value numbers. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden**  The estimated respondent burden is that associated with the a ctivities which result in the attainment demonstration, RFP SIP submission, and RACT SIP submission. The estimated burden is incremental to that required b y other EPA environmental reporting obligations. The incremental burden for some areas may be less th an for others. There are several reasons for this disparity .  The severity of the non
- attainment problem varies among the designated areas.  Certain areas or parts of areas may already have developed and implemented RACT requirements.  Some areas may

have future predicted 8
- hour ozone design values which demonstrate attainment in expeditious and practicable fashion, within 5 years of designation, under baseline conditions.  Some areas may

fulfill the RFP requirement as a result of creditable emission reduction s resulting from federal rules that reduce ozone precursor emissions. **Non -**  **attainment Areas** . The s ubpart 1 non
- attainment areas d efinition was vacated in 2007 after the publication of the 8
- hour ozone NAAQS. Reclassifications of these areas were promulgated and published in the Federal Register on May 14, 2012 (77 FR 28423) . As of this ICR, two of the former s ubp art 1 areas have redesignat ed to maintenance . T here are currently 3 4 s ubpart 2 areas which includes the f ormer s ubpart 1 areas. As a starting point for developing burden estimates, the EPA looked at the total hours expended in related EPA level of effort work assignments, exclusive of the air quality modeling. The total was about 300 hours in level of technical effort for areas that plan to redesignate before the 2010 redesignations, 500 hours in technical effort for f ormer s ubpart 1 areas where the SIPs must be corrected for new classification , 7 300 hours for SIP corrections after 1
- ye ar attainment date extensions have been granted, and 1000 hours for SIP corrections by M oderate or above non - attaining areas and areas whose original designation ha d been escalated. The potential scope of that effor

t was geographically

broad including all non
- attainment areas outside AZ, CA, and NV. Examples of the specific scope of the effort included:

 Design of lower cost control strategies

7 EPA Contract No. 68 - D - 00 - 283; Work Assignments 3
- 53 and 4
- 66.15

 Examination of alternative emission reduction targets and geographic areas (e.g., staying in state but going up to 100km for VOC emissions reductions and up to 200km for NOx emission reductions for some non
- attainment areas)  Assessment of RFP requirements for certain non
- attainment areas  Assessment of RACT if there was not a pre vious requirement  Differences in cost, emission reductions, economic, and energy impacts looking at alternative frameworks for Phases 1 and 2 of the Implementation Rule. Most of these areas have met previous RACT requirements. Also, many of these areas h ad RFP plans in place for the 1
- hour Ozone NAAQS. Furthermore, for some of these areas, the RFP requirement is met or reduced because of creditable emission reductions resulting from federal rules reducing emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and/or nitrogen oxides (NOx). These activities are related to but do not precisel y mimic the incremental activities undertaken b y a state to fulfill the attainment demonstration including the reasonabl y available control measure anal ys is as well as the RACT S IP , and RFP SIP submissions for a given non
attainment area. Most of this estimated burden would be incurred in the first year. This is because of the overlap of emission reductions associated with the attainment demonstration, RACT requirements and the RFP requirements. For example, emission reductions resulting from RACT may be creditable toward attainment and RFP. Furthermore, for areas which are projected to meet the standard b y 20 10 , that demonstration fulfills the RACT and RFP requirements. The pres umed allocation of total incremental burden across time is 50% in year 1 , 25% in year 2, and 25% in year 3. The estimated incremental burden for the non - attainment areas is present ed in Table 3 . **Table 3**  **. Estimated Incre me**  **ntal Burden for the States Attainm**  **ent De mo**  **nstration, RACT SIP Submission, and RFP SIP Submission.**  **State EPA** 

**Region No. of Areas** 

**or Parts of Areas**  **Additional**

**Hours Year 1 Additional** 

**Hours Year 2 Additional** 

**Hours Year 3** Arizona 9 1 0 0 0 California 9 1 4 5,000 2,500 2,500 Colorado 8 1 0 0 0 Connecticut 1 2 0 0 0 Delaware 3 1 0 0 0 District of Columbia 3 1 0 0 0 Georgia 4 1 0 0 0 Maryland 3 3 2,500 1, 25 0 1, 25 0 Massachusetts 1 2 0 0 0 Missouri 7 1 0 0 0 New Jersey 2 2 0 0 0 New York 2 5 0 0 0 North Carolina 4 1 0 0 0 Pennsylvania 3 2 0 0 0 Texas 6 2 2, 5 0 0 1, 25 0 1, 25 016

Virginia 3 1 0 0 0 Wisconsin 5 1 0 0 0 **Total N/A**  **41 10,000**  **5,000 5,000**  **6(b) Estimating Respondent Cost**  Labor costs are estimated for state governments using the total of projected additional hours for the f

ormer s ubpart 1 and s ubpart 2 areas. These estimates do not reflect staff experience and eco nomies of scale. The hourl y rates are the result of estimated directed and indirect cost per employee. The main source of the information is http://www.opm.gov/oca/pay rates/index.htm The estimated weighted direct salary cost per employee is $ 41.20 per hour. This results from a summation of the professional, managerial, and support staff components.

 Hourly

equivalent 2009 Salary

of Permanent Professional Staff at GS 11, Step 3 is $ 33.34 . This is the average of hourly equivalent rates for the San Francisco, C A and Washington, D.C. areas.  To account for permanent managerial staff, 1/11 or 9% of the hourl y rate for GS 13, Step 3 is added to the professional staff hourl y rates. The average hourly equivalent rate for GS - 13 using rates for San Francisco, CA and Was hington, D.C. is $47.51. Nine percent of that is $4.32
.  To account for permanent support staff at GS
- 6, Step 6, 1/8 or 16% of the hourly rate is added to the professional staff hourl y rates. The average hourl y equivalent rate for GS
- 6, Step 6 using rates f

or San Francisco, CA and Washington, D.C. is $22.17. Sixteen percent of that is $3.55. The estimated hourl y indirect cost per employee is $23.90. This amount is the sum of the following:

 Benefits at 16% of the weighted direct hourl y equivalent salary cost per employee or $6.59.  Sick and annual leave at 10% of the weighted direct hourly equivalent salary

cost per employee or $4.12.  General overhead at 32% of the weighed direct hourly equivalent salary

cost per employee or $13.18. The estimated total weighted direct and indirect hourly equivalent salary

cost per employee is $65.10. The estimated total incremental respondent burden for the attainment demonstration, RACT SIP submittal, and RFP SIP submittal is provided in Table 4.17 **Table 4. Estimated Total Increm**  **ental Cost and Hour Burden for the States (Respondents) to Fulfill the Attainm**  **ent Dem onstration, RACT SIP Submittal, and RFP SIP Submittal Requirem**  **ents. Areas**  **Additional Cost**

**for Year 1 Additional Cost** 

**for Year 2 Additional Cost** 

**for Year 3 Burden for the 3**  **- year**  **ICR period Total**  $ 651,000 $ 325,500 $ 325,500 20,000 hours **6(c) Estimating**  **EP A**  **Burden and Cost** The estimated EPA burden is derived from the estimates for the respondents. Draft estimates were developed by the headquarters staff with review by regional office staff and subsequent refinement of the Agency burden and cost estimates. The respondent burden was summed by the EPA regional offices and a percentage was applied to the yearl y burden estimate to reflect the actions taken o n the part of the regional offices. Once ye arl y burdens were estimated for the Agency’s Regional Offices, a percentage of those amounts are specified to derive estimates for the Agency ’s Headquarters Office Burdens. Discussions were held with Regional Office and Headquarters staff regarding the percentages and resulting burden estimates. **EPA Regional Office Burden.**  Table 5 summarizes total incremental respondent burden by Regional Office and provides estimates of total incremental the EPA Regional Off ice burden. The summary

of total incremental respondent burden comes from Tables 3 and 4 . The EP A Regional Office burden is presumed to be 10% of the estimated total incremental burden for r espondent by the EPA Regional Office. The total incremental burden allocation for the EP A Regional Offices in Table 5 is 50% in year 1, 25% in year 2, and 25% in year 3. In discussion s with EP A Regional Office staff, they indicated that the total incremental burden estimates were ballpark. However, some regional office staff felt that a more reasonable allocation of total incremental EPA Regional Office burden would be 37.5% in year 1, 37 .5 % in ye ar 2, and 25% in year 3. If that allocation were used , the corresponding EP A Regional Office burden estimates in years 1, 2, and 3 would be 750 ; 75 0 ; and, 500 respectively .18

**Table 5**  **. Estimated EP**  **A Regional Office Burden Derived by Taking 10% of Regional**  **Respondent Burden Total**  **for Years 1, 2, and 3**  **EPA Regional**  **Office Year 1** 

**Respondents’ Burden**  **Year 1 EP**  **A**

**Reg. Office Burden**  **Year 2 EP**  **A**

**Reg. Office Burden**  **Year 3 EP**  **A**

**Reg Office Burden**  1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 5,0 00 250 125 125 4 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 7.5 7.5 6 5,000 250 125 125 7 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 9 10,000 500 250 250 10 0 0 0 0 **Total 20,000**  **1,000 500**  **500 EP** **A Headquarters Burden**  . The Regional Office burden estimates for ye ars 1, 2, and 3 are multiplied by

10% to arrive at an estimate for Headquarters burden for the same 3 years. Resulting hours for ye ars 1, 2, and 3 are 100 , 50 , and 5 0 , respectivel y. **Total Incremental Burden for the EP**  **A** . The regional and headquarters office burden estimate for ye ar 1 is 1,100 hours. The estimates for years 2 and 3 are 550 hours each ye ar. **Total Cost for the EP** **A** . Using the weighted direct and indi rect salary equivalent hour rate derived in section 6(b), the total incremental burden hours are multiplied by that rate. The result is the total cost estimate for the EPA ; see Table 6 . **Table 6**  **. Total Cost Estim ate for the**  **EP A**  **Entity Year 1**  **Year 2 Year**  **3** Regional Office $65,100 $32,550 $32,550 Headquarters Office $6,510 $3,255 $3,255 **Total EP**  **A Cost $ 71,610**  **$ 35,805 $35,805**  **6(d) Estimating the Respondent**  **Universe and Total Additional Burden and Costs** T itle Iof the Clean Air Act of 1990 provided a classification sy stem for 1
- hour Ozone NAAQS non - attainment areas along with prescribed programs and measures for those areas. In essence, there was no increme ntal administrative burden associated with the implementation of the 1
- hour standard associated with discretionary action on the part of the EPA . However, with the promulgation of the 1997 8 - hour Ozone NAAQS, the non
- attainment designations, and the finali zation of Phases 1 and 2 of the Ozone Implementation rule, the Office of Management and Budget believed there were there were additional administrative burdens by the EP A . This I CR attempts to develop estimates of the incremental burden resulting from the transition from a 1
- hour to an 8
- hour form of the standard.19

The major set of respondents is the states, as they have over 90% of the estimated additional burden. There is also burden imposed on the Regional and Headquarters Offices of the EPA . Because of the overlap in work for the attainment demonstration, RACT SIP submittal, and RFP SIP submittal, most of the cost will be incurred in year 1 of the 3 year period covered by this I CR. In the EPA ’s roles as facilitator, compiler, reviewer, and p reparer, the estimated burden for the EPA is also expected to be greater in the 1 st ye ar than in the 2 nd or 3 rd years. The total incremental respondent universe burden and cost estimates are presented in Table 7 . **Table 7**  **. Total Incremental Respondent &**  **EP A Universe Burden and Cost Estim**  **ates** Entity Average Yearly Burden 3 - Year Burden Hours Present Value of Costs for 3
- Year Burden States 6 , 66 7 20,000 $ 1. 42 million EP A 733 1,100 $ 0. 16 million **Total 7,400**  **21,100 $**  **1. 58**  **mi llion**  * The estimates are in current year (20 12 ) dollars. Costs for years 2 and 3 are calculated using the equation Present Value = Future Value/ (1 + interest rate) t ,where “t” is the number of years hence (i.e., 0 for year 1, 1 for year 2, 2 for year 3). The adjusted values for years 1, 2, and 3 are then summed. **6( e**  **) Reason for**  **No Change in Burden**  The 2010 ICR Renewal currentl y approved b y OMB (EPA ICR #2236.03) estimated that there were 39 respondents or affected entities, namely , state and local g overnments. The total number of estimated annual burden was 6,667 hours. The estimated total annual costs was $434,000. There is neither an increase nor a decrease in burden compared with that identified in the 2010 IC R renewal due to the following factors :
 The number of non
- attainment areas has decreased as areas have come into compliance with the standards  The number of non
- attainment areas with SIP revisions required has decreased as areas have either submitted the requirements or the planning requirements have been suspended with a Clean Data Determination.  The additional burden associated with the remaining non
- attainment areas is less because of the work they

have done previously

to compl y with the standards.  The EPA’s final rule of May 14, 2012 (77 F R 28423 ) assigning former subpart 1 ozone non
attainment areas re
- designations under subpart 2, resulted in non
- attainment areas with additional burden for completing SIP revisions.  T he additional annual burden and the annual costs proposed in this I CR Ren ewal equal the burden and cost estimated in the previously OMB - approved 2010 EPA I CR #2236.03. The estimates have been calculated using 20 12 dollars and some assumptions regarding overhead, O&M costs, and capital costs have been adjusted to meet current guidelines and common procedures for preparing ICRs.20

**6( f**  **) Burden Statement**  The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1,111 hours for this reporting period. This estimate is derived b y taking 6,667 hours, the average yearl y burden for the states identified in Table 7 , and dividing by 6 , the number of affected areas located in Maryland, Texas and California . Burden means the to tal time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide information or for a Federal agency other than the EPA to do so. This estimate includes the time and burden needed to conduct the tasks associated with 3 milestones covered during this ICR reporting period. Those milestones are the RACT SIP submittal, RFP SIP submittal, and the attainment demonstration. Inmeeting these milestones , such incremental efforts may include reviewing instructions as we ll as verifying, processing, maintaining, and disclosing information. Such efforts may

require incremental development, acquisition, installation, and/or utilization of technological s ys tems for several purposes. These purposes include collecting, verifyin g, validating, processing, maintaining and disclosing information associated with the 3 milestones . The incremental efforts may result from adjusting the way s to comply with the previously applicable instructions associated with the 1
- hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. Consequently , in meeting the 3 milestones, there could be some incremental burden associated with learning/training, searching data sources, and transmitting the deliverables. An A gency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a perso n is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the EPA’s regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. When this I CR is approved by OMB, the EP A will publish a technical amendment to 40 CFR part 9 in the Federal Register to display the OMB control number for the approved information collection requirements contained in the final implementation rule. However, as stated in the November 29, 2005 F ederal Register Notice for the 8 - hour Ozone Implementation Rule on page 71,693, “. . . the failure to have an approved IC R for this rule does not affect the statutory obligation for the States to submit SIPs as required under part D of the CAA.” The EP A es tablished a docket for the 8
- hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Implementation Rule under Docket ID No. EPA - HQ - OAR - 2003 - 0079 , which is available for online viewing at: http://www.regulations.gov . Although listed in the index, some information such as Confidential Business Information is not publicly available. Other information such as cop yrighted materials are not placed on the internet, but are available in hard copy form at the EPA Docket Center (Air Docket), EPA/DC, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday

through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566 - 1744. The telephone number for the Office of Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center is (202) 566
- 1742. **PART B** This section is not applicable because statistical methods are not used in data collection associated with the proposed rule.