alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 863 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 863

   To require appropriate off-budget treatment of Social Security in 
                    official budget pronouncements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 1999

     Mr. Herger (for himself, Mr. Minge, Mr. Bass, Mr. Peterson of 
  Minnesota, Mr. Smith of Michigan, Mr. Gutknecht, Mr. Franks of New 
   Jersey, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Thomas, Mr. McCrery, Ms. 
 Woolsey, Mr. Crane, and Mr. Campbell) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require appropriate off-budget treatment of Social Security in 
                    official budget pronouncements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Budgeting and 
Investment Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. REMOVING SOCIAL SECURITY FROM BUDGET PRONOUNCEMENTS.

    Any official statement issued by the Office of Management and 
Budget, the Congressional Budget Office, or any other agency or 
instrumentality of the Federal Government of surplus or deficit totals 
of the budget of the United States Government as submitted by the 
President or of the surplus or deficit totals of the congressional 
budget, and any description of, or reference to, such totals in any 
official publication or material issued by either of such Offices or 
any other such agency or instrumentality, shall exclude the outlays and 
receipts of the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program 
under title II of the Social Security Act (including the Federal Old-
Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability 
Insurance Trust Fund) and the related provisions of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The provisions of section 2 shall apply with respect to fiscal year 
2000 and subsequent fiscal years, except that the exclusion required 
under section 2 with respect to receipts shall apply--
            (1) for fiscal year 2000, only with respect to the excess 
        of total receipts over receipts consisting of interest earned 
        on investments of the Trust Funds referred to in section 2, and
            (2) for fiscal year 2001, only with respect to the excess 
        of total receipts over 50 percent of receipts consisting of 
        interest earned on investments of such Trust Funds.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 8715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3345]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Technology Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC'').

ACTION: Notice of meeting of Technology Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Technology Advisory Committee will hold a rescheduled 
public meeting on March 1, 2011, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., at the CFTC's 
Washington, DC headquarters.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 1, 2011 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. 
The meeting was previously scheduled for January 27, 2011, but has been 
rescheduled. Members of the public who wish to submit written 
statements in connection with the meeting should submit them by 
February 28, 2011.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place in the first floor hearing room 
at the CFTC's headquarters, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20581. Written statements should be submitted to: 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581, Attention: Office of the Secretary. 
Please use the title ``Technology Advisory Committee'' in any written 
statement you may submit. Any statements submitted in connection with 
the committee meeting will be made available to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Gardy, Commodity Futures Trading 
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20581, (202) 418-5354.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Matters to be addressed at the meeting are:

Recommendations from the Pre-trade Functionality Subcommittee
Consideration of Technology Challenges for Implementation of 
Architectures for Trade Processing and Records Management
    The meeting will be webcast on the CFTC's Web site, http://www.cftc.gov. Members of the public also can listen to the meeting by 
telephone. The public access call-in numbers will be announced at a 
later date.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. app. 2 Sec.  10(a)(2)

    By the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

    Dated: February 9, 2011.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-3345 Filed 2-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Incitations,
Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dominique Bellemare, Principal Executive and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.




By:   /s/ Dominique Bellemare
      ----------------------------------------
Name: Dominique Bellemare
Principal Executive and Principal Accounting Officer
March 17, 2003
!function(a,n,e){"use strict";var i=!1;n.behaviors.mainMenuMobileOperations={attach:function(n,e){var i=a(".we-mega-menu-submenu .block-block-content",n);a(".field--name-field-d-main-title",i).length}},n.behaviors.mainMenuMobileNavbarListener={attach:function(n,i){a(e("d_main_menu_open","#navbar-main button.navbar-toggler",n)).click((function(){a(".navbar").hasClass("collapsing")||(a("body").toggleClass("navbar-open"),a(".navbar").toggleClass("open"),a("html, body").stop().animate({scrollTop:0},500),a(this).attr("aria-expanded","false"===a(this).attr("aria-expanded")))})),a(e("d_main_menu_close",".main-navbar",n)).click((function(e){var i=a(e.target);0==i.parents(".navbar-inner").length&&0==i.is(".navbar-inner")&&a("#navbar-main button.navbar-toggler:visible",n).click()}))}},n.behaviors.mainMenuMobileSubmenuToggle={attach:function(n,e){var i=a(".we-mega-menu-li.with-submenu",n),t=a("> a.we-mega-menu-li, > span.we-megamenu-nolink",i);t.length&&(a(".main-navbar"),t.each((function(){var n=a(this);n.toggleClass("open",n.parent().is(".active")),n.is("a")&&n.find(".d-submenu-toggler")})))}},n.behaviors.mainMenuDeepActiveTrail={attach:function(n,e){var i=a("nav.navbar",n);if("/"==window.location.pathname)return!1;i.find('a[href$="'+window.location.pathname+'"]').each((function(){var n=a(this);n.addClass("active-menu-item"),n.parents(".we-mega-menu-li.with-submenu").addClass("active-trail open"),n.parents(".type-of-block").addClass("active-trail open")}))}},n.behaviors.unsetHiddenNavElements={attach:function(n,t){var o=a("nav.navbar",n);e("d_main_menu_resize","html").length&&a(window).resize((function(){window.innerWidth>992&&i&&(o.find('[style*="display: none"]').removeAttr("style"),i=!1)}))}}}(jQuery,Drupal,once);
#### § 105-50.001-1 State.

*State* means any of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, or any agency or instrumentality of a State, but does not include the governments of the political subdivisions of the State.
ex10-5.htm


Exhibit 10.7

 

AMENDMENT TO 

SALON MEDIA GROUP, INC.

SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT

 

This amendment to that certain Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement” or the “Bridge Financing”) executed August 5, 2016 by Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”), and Heather Gillette, is made as of January 24, 2017 to amend the class of shares that Ms. Gillette will receive pursuant to the Bridge Financing and to satisfy the Company’s obligations thereunder. Under the Securities Purchase Agreement Ms. Gillette purchased one or more promissory notes with an aggregate principal amount of $100,000 (the “Notes”) which were to convert into shares of the Common Stock of the Company. As the Company does not have sufficient authorized shares of Common Stock to fully satisfy Ms. Gillette’s purchase of shares of Common Stock of the Company, Ms. Gillette agrees to accept shares of Series A Mandatorily Convertible Voting Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) in place of the shares of Common Stock in conversion of the Notes. Accordingly, in full satisfaction of all of the Company’s obligations under the Securities Purchase Agreement and the Notes, and in lieu of receiving shares of Common Stock, Ms. Gillette agrees to receive 89,656 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock upon the execution of the Purchase Agreement dated January 24, 2017 between the Company and the Purchasers identified therein, and the initial closing of the Private Placement under said Purchase Agreement. Upon the Company’s filing of the Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the Company’s authorized share capital as described in the Purchase Agreement, the shares Series A Preferred Stock will automatically convert into shares of Common Stock of the Company. 

 

Upon the initial closing of the Purchase Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary as stated in the Securities Purchase Agreement or the Notes, the Securities Purchase Agreement and the Notes shall terminate and the Company shall no longer have any obligations with respect thereto. Until such time, the Securities Purchase Agreement remains in all respects in full force and effect. 

 

	
 
	
SALON MEDIA GROUP, INC.

 

/s/ Jordan Hoffner                                                            

 

Dated:   1/24/17                                                                 

 

 

 

 

HEATHER GILLETTE

 

/s/ Heather Gillette                                                            

 

Dated:   1/24/17
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 1 7

- BG

- 241

IN RE EDWIN A. QUARTEY

, Respondent.

B ar Reg istration No. 460866 D DN 00 7

- 17

BEFORE: Blackburne

- Rigsby

, Chief Judge, McLeese, Associate Judge, and

Farrell , Senior Judge.

O R D E R

(Filed

– May 18 , 2017)

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Maryland for six months by consent; t his court’s
March 13, 2017

, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed ; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline ; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to this court’s show cause order or file the required D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit , it is

ORDERED that Edwin A. Quartey is hereby suspended from the practice of

law in the District of Columbia for a period of six months

. See In re Sibley , 990

A.2d 483

, 487

- 88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that the presumption of identical discipline in D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (c) will prevail except in “rare” cases); In re

Cole , 809 A.2d 1226, 1227 n.3 (D.C. 2002) (explaining that in unopposed reciprocal ma tters the “imposition of identical discipline should be close to automatic”)

. F or purposes of reinstatement

, the suspension will not begin to run

until such time as respondent files a D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.

PER CURIAM
Th e Law Offic e o f Darrel l J . Green , LL C 77 0 S . Willo w Par

k Driv e Lehi , U T 8404 3 Telephone : (660 ) 624-218 1 Email : green.770@comcast.net

Jul y 18,201 5 VIA ELECTRONI C SUBMISSIO N Federal Docke tManagemen tWebsite U . S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t Management

System 120 0 New Jerse

y Ave. , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Respons e t o FA A Reques t fo r Informatio n Lan d Ai r Beyon d Photograph y FAA-2015-166 0 Dea r Si r or Madam : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r Reques t fo r Furthe r Informatio n fro mLan d Ai r Beyon d Photography , LL C (Lan d Air ) date d Jul y 16 , 2015 . Lan d Ai r i s requestin g tha

t yo u procee d withou t

aMotio n Picture an d Televisio n Operation s Manual (MPTOM ) a s Lan d Ai r i s no t requestin g authorit

y to operat e i n aclosed-se

t filmin g environment . Thank you . Sincerely ,

Darrel l J . Green , J D
#### § 105-71.122 Allowable costs.

(a) *Limitation on use of funds.* Grant funds may be used only for:

(1) The allowable costs of the grantees, subgrantees and cost-type contractors, including allowable costs in the form of payments to fixed-price contractors; and

(2) Reasonable fees or profit to cost-type contractors but not any fee or profit (or other increment above allowable costs) to the grantee or subgrantee.

(b) *Applicable cost principles.* For each kind of organization, there is a set of Federal principles for determining allowable costs. Allowable costs will be determined in accordance with the cost principles applicable to the organization incurring the costs. The following chart lists the kinds of organizations and the applicable cost principles:

| For the costs of a— | Use the principles in— |
| --- | --- |
| State, local or Indian tribal government. | OMB Circular A-87. |
| Private nonprofit organization other than an (1) institution of higher education, (2) hospital, or (3) organization named in OMB Circular A-122 as not subject to that circular | OMB Circular A-122. |
| Educational institutions | OMB Circular A-21 |
| For-profit organization other than a hospital and an organization named in OMB Circular A-122 as not subject to that circular | 48 CFR part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, or uniform cost accounting standards that comply with cost principles acceptable to the Federal agency. |
#### § 109-43.307-51 Classified personal property.

Classified personal property which is excess to DOE needs shall be stripped of all characteristics which cause it to be classified, or otherwise rendered unclassified, as determined by the cognizant program office, prior to any disposition action. The cognizant program office shall certify that appropriate action has been taken to declassify the personal property as required. Declassification shall be accomplished in a manner which will preserve, so far as practicable, any civilian utility or commercial value of the personal property.
``



``

``

EXHIBIT 32.1


``





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dinesh R. Desai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


















/s/ Dinesh R. DesaiChief Executive OfficerApril 14, 2011
#### § 102-75.425 Who has sole responsibility for enforcing compliance with the terms and conditions of disposal for property disposed of for use as a public airport?

The Administrator of the FAA has the sole responsibility for enforcing compliance with the terms and conditions of disposals to be used as a public airport. The FAA is also responsible for reforming, correcting, or amending any disposal instruments; granting releases; and any action necessary for recapturing the property, using the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47101 *et seq.*
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Corautus Genetics Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. Otto, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard E. OttoRichard E. OttoPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 30, 2004




---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Corautus Genetics Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert T. Atwood, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert T. AtwoodRobert T. AtwoodExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 30, 2004
**EXHIBIT NO. 99:CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THEPRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995**

Written or oral statements madeby Alcan or its representatives, including statements set forth in Alcan's Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, which describe the Company's ormanagement's objectives, projections, estimates, expectations or predictions ofthe future may be "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the UnitedStates Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which can be identifiedby the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may,""will," "should," "estimates," "anticipates" or the negative thereof or othervariations thereon. The Company cautions that, by their nature, forward-lookingstatements involve risk and uncertainty and that the Company's actual resultscould differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-lookingstatements or could affect the extent to which a particular projection isrealized.

Important factors which couldcause the Company's actual performance to differ materially from projections orexpectations included in forward-looking statements include global aluminumsupply and demand conditions, aluminum ingot prices and changes in other rawmaterials costs and availability, cyclical demand and pricing within theprincipal markets for the Company's products, changes in governmentregulations, particularly those affecting environmental, health or safetycompliance, economic developments and other factors within the countries inwhich the Company operates or sells its products and other factors relating tothe Company's ongoing operations including, but not limited to, litigation,labour negotiations and fiscal regimes.

Copies of the Company's filingsmay be obtained by contacting the Company or the United States Securities andExchange Commission.
##### 



Exhibit 12


AT&T Corp.


Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


(Unaudited)


(Dollars in millions)


|                                                     |  |                      |       | 
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ----- | 
|                                                     |  | For the Three Months |      
|                                                     |  | Ended March 31, 2005 |      
|                                                     |  |                      |      
|Income before income taxes                           |  | $                    | 897   | 
|Add: fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest   |  |                      | 236   | 
|                                                     |  |                      |      
|Total earnings before income taxes and fixed charges |  | $                    | 1,133 | 
|                                                     |  |                      |      
|Fixed Charges:                                       |  |                      |       | 
|Total interest expense                               |  | $                    | 203   | 
|Capitalized interest                                 |  |                      | 4     | 
|Interest portion of rental expense                   |  |                      | 33    | 
|                                                     |  |                      |      
|Total fixed charges                                  |  | $                    | 240   | 
|                                                     |  |                      |      
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   |  |                      | 4.7   |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

NELSON FERNANDEZ,

Case No. 9:22-cv-81512-AMC

Plaintiff,

v.

LITE USA HOLDINGS, INC.

d/b/a LITE STORE USA,

a Florida for-profit corporation,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

PROPOSED ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of 

Time to Respond to Complaint. The Court, having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the 

premises, finds that there is good cause to grant the relief requested in the Motion. It is therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and Defendant shall respond 

to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before November 16, 2022. 

DONE AND ORDERED this ___ day of _________ 2022, in Chambers of the United 

States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

THE HONORABLE AILEEN M. CANNON

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 9:22-cv-81512-AMC Document 5-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022 Page 1 of 1