alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the

DEPARTM ENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC

INTRA ALASKA BUSH MAIL RATES Docket OST-2003-14694

REPLY OF THE UNITED STATES POST AL SERVICE ON S HOW CAUSE ORDER 2011-6-14 AND SUBSEQUENT COMMENTS BY THE CONSOLIDATED CARRIERS

Communications with respect to this

document should be addressed to:

Joseph Anzalone, Esq.

Office of General Counsel

United States Postal Service

475 L’Enfant Plaza SW Washington, DC 20260-1127 joseph.anzalone@usps.gov

Date Filed: September 8, 2011

12 The Postal Service presents brief comments in response to Show Cause Order 2011-6-14 (“the Order”) and in response to objections and comm ents filed in reference to the Order.

As to the substance of the rates proposed in the Order, the Postal Service has no objection. The Postal Service requests that the Department make the mail rates from the Order effective for a period of 12 months from when the Department finalizes the rates.

The Postal Service reiterates th at it supports the reporting by air carrier(s) to the Department of mail class costs that are segmented by actua l equipment used to perform service. The Postal Service does not support the position of excluding specific equipment from the rate class that it legally operates within. All equipment operating under Part 121 or Part 135 bush operations should be included in the appropriate rate class esta blished in the Department’s ratemaking methodology. With this in mind, the Po stal Service agrees with the Department’s interpretation of 39 U.S.C. § 5402(h)(2)(B) as restated on page 6 of the Order.

The Postal Service also supports the Department’s proposed adop tion of a Taper as proposed

in the Order. The Postal Service believes it is the right time to rein troduce the Taper in the Bush 135 rate, and agrees that a Taper provides a closer fit to actual costs. However, the Postal Service highly objects to the proposals contained in th e July 19, 2011 Answer of the

Consolidated Carriers.

The Postal Service also objects to the A ugust 26, 2011 Motion of the Consolidated Carriers proposing the exclusion from the Part 135 bush ma il rate of PenAir’s Saab and Metroliner

costs and data. The Postal Service has vehemen tly objected in the past to similar proposals by the Consolidated Carriers, and such similar pr oposals have been uniformly rejected by the Department for good reason. There is no reasonabl e basis to reverse cour se and entertain the Consolidated Carriers’ proposal.
#### § 966.13 Ex parte communications.

Ex parte communications are not allowed between a party and the Hearing Official or the Official's staff. For these purposes, ex parte communication means an oral or written communication, not on the public record, with one party only with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all parties is not given, but it shall not include requests for status reports or procedural matters. A memorandum of any communication between the Hearing Official and a party will be transmitted to both parties.

[77 FR 65106, Oct. 25, 2012]
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58 QPM# AIR-ANM-ll30-F7 Date: December 17, 2008 Revision 1 

# Record ofContacts .20'0 -

# o2';l.l~ FDMS Docket No. FAA-ZOO

__ - _ With whom outside the FAA hasthis proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date ATA Joe White November-12-2009 Boeing Long Beach Jim Finn November~06·2009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List 10Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
§ 105-56.033 Disposition of amounts collected. ( a ) The disbursing official conducting the offset will transmit amounts collected for debts, less fees charged under § 105-56.032 of this subpart, to the creditor agency.
( b ) If an erroneous offset payment is made to the creditor agency, the disbursing official will notify the creditor agency that an erroneous offset payment has been made. ( 1 ) The disbursing official may deduct the amount of the erroneous offset payment from future amounts payable to the creditor agency; or
( 2 ) Alternatively, upon the disbursing official's request, the creditor agency will promptly return to the disbursing official or the affected payee an amount equal to the amount of the erroneous payment (without regard to whether any other amounts payable to the creditor agency have been paid). The disbursing official and the creditor agency will adjust the debtor records appropriately.
#### § 551.2 Semipostal stamps.

Semipostal stamps are stamps that are sold for a price that exceeds the postage value of the stamp. The difference between the price and postage value of semipostal stamps, also known as the differential, less an offset for reasonable costs, as determined by the Postal Service, consists of a contribution to fund causes determined by the Postal Service to be in the national public interest and appropriate. Funds are to be transferred to selected recipient executive agencies, as defined under 5 U.S.C. 105. The office of Stamp Services determines the print quantities of semipostal stamps. The use of semipostal stamps shall be voluntary on the part of postal patrons.
Order entered December 14 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 21

- 00467

- CR

JULIO CESAR SOTO

- GALVAN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 32930CR

O RDER

We abated this appeal for the trial court to appoint new counsel for

appellant. The trial court has appointed counsel, and counsel for appellant has

filed appellant’s brief. W e REINSTATE this appeal.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
**Exhibit 23.(B)**

**Independent Auditors’ Report**

The Board of Directors 

PainCare Holdings, Inc. 

We have audited theaccompanying consolidated balance sheets of PainCare Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidatedfinancial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsto obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditalso includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for ouropinion. 

As discussed in note 2 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company has restated its 2004 and 2003 consolidatedfinancial statements. 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,the consolidated financial position of PainCare Holdings, Inc., as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its consolidated operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally acceptedin the United States of America. 

/s/ Tschopp, Whitcomb & Orr, P.A. 

March 4, 2005, except for note 2 as to which the date is April 17, 2006 

Maitland,Florida
§ 102-117.340 What other types of assistance may GSA provide agencies in dealing with regulatory bodies? ( a ) GSA has oversight of all public utilities used by the Federal Government including transportation. There are specific regulatory requirements a TSP must meet at the State level, such as the requirement to obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity.
( b ) GSA has a list of TSPs, which meet certain criteria regarding insurance and safety, approved by DOT. You must furnish GSA with an affidavit to determine if the TSP meets the basic qualification to protect the Government's interest. As an oversight mandate, GSA coordinates this function. For further information email *transportation.programs@gsa.gov* or contact: General Services Administration, Federal Acquisition Service, Office of Travel, Employee Relocation and Transportation, 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405.
[65 FR 60061, Oct. 6, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 51394, Aug. 20, 2010; 87 FR 32323, May 31, 2022]
§ 105-68.110 What is the purpose of the nonprocurement debarment and suspension system? ( a ) To protect the public interest, the Federal Government ensures the integrity of Federal programs by conducting business only with responsible persons.
( b ) A Federal agency uses the nonprocurement debarment and suspension system to exclude from Federal programs persons who are not presently responsible.
( c ) An exclusion is a serious action that a Federal agency may take only to protect the public interest. A Federal agency may not exclude a person or commodity for the purposes of punishment.
§ 105-70.033 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing shall be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written statement or deposition. Any such written statement must be provided to all other parties along with the last known address of such witness, in a manner which allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena such witness for cross-examination at the hearing. Prior written statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing and deposition transcripts shall be exchanged as provided in § 105-70.022(a).
( c ) The ALJ shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to— ( 1 ) Make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth,
( 2 ) Avoid needless consumption of time, and
( 3 ) Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
( d ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( e ) To the extent permitted by the ALJ, cross-examination on matters outside the scope of direct examination shall be conducted in the manner of direct examination and may proceed by leading questions only if the witness is a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party.
( f ) Upon motion of any party, the ALJ shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. This rule does not authorize exclusion of— ( 1 ) A party who is an individual;
( 2 ) In the case of a party that is not an individual, an officer or employee of the party appearing for the entity *pro se* or designated by the party's representative; or
( 3 ) An individual whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including an individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government.
Exhibit 10.2


 


Waiver Dated September 13, 2019


 


of Section 6.5 of NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
AND GUARANTY Dated as of August 13, 2018 


 


TEXT OF WAIVER PROVIDED BY HG VORA SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES
MASTER FUND, LTD., AS PURCHASER UNDER THE NOTE PURCHASE AGREEEMENT 


 


(provided via email dated September 13, 2019)


 


Reference is made to that certain Note Purchase Agreement and
Guaranty (the “NPA”), dated as of August 13, 2018, by and among Gaming Acquisitions Limited, a limited liability company
formed under the laws of England and Wales (the “Issuer”), Inspired Entertainment, Inc., a corporation formed under
the laws of Delaware (“Holdings”), Holdings and certain subsidiaries of Issuer, as guarantors, the purchasers party
thereto from time to time, and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as note agent and as collateral agent.


 


We understand that the Issuer, Holdings, and certain subsidiaries
of Issuer from time to time party thereto (collectively, the “Company” or “you”) intend to enter into a
new Senior Facilities Agreement (the “SFA”), among the Company, Nomura International plc and Macquarie Corporate Holdings
Pty Limited (UK Branch) as arrangers and/or bookrunners, each other lender party thereto from time to time, Lucid Agency Services
Limited, as agent, and Lucid Trustee Services Limited, as security agent, in connection with the Chaucer acquisition (of which
you have previously informed us).


 


We hereby agree that your execution and delivery of, and compliance
with, the SFA prior to the closing of the Chaucer acquisition, does not result in a violation of Section 6.5 of the NPA, upon the
understanding that the proceeds of the SFA, when funded upon the closing of the Chaucer acquisition, will be used in part to repay
in full your obligations under the NPA and subject to the condition that none of Holdings nor any of its subsidiaries shall permit
any obligations under the SFA to be secured by any of their respective assets prior to such repayment in full of the NPA. The foregoing
agreement shall immediately expire on the earliest to occur of (a) the termination of the Chaucer acquisition agreement, (b) the
declaration of a default, pursuit of any remedies or commencement of any enforcement action by any creditor under the SFA, (c)
the repayment in full of the NPA or (d) October 30, 2019.
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

In re E.G.A., a Minor.

Jean-Christophe Albou, Petitioner,

v.

Ana-Maria Toro, Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 22-23128-Civ-Scola

Order of Dismissal

The parties have dismissed this suit without prejudice in accordance 

with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Joint Stip. for Dismissal, 

ECF No. 40.) Because this matter has been resolved, the Court directs the 

Clerk to release to the Respondent, Ana-Maria Toro, or to counsel for the 

Respondent all of the Child’s travel documents that the Respondent previously 

surrendered to the Clerk. The Court directs the Clerk to close this case. All 

pending motions, if any, are denied as moot. 

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on January 6, 2023.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:22-cv-23128-RNS Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-117.265 Are there time limits that affect filing a claim with a TSP for loss or damage?

Yes, several statutes limit the time for filing claims or taking other administrative or judicial action against a TSP. Refer to part 102-118 of this chapter for information on claims.
#### § 102-75.765 What does the term “law enforcement” mean?

The OJP defines “law enforcement” as “any activity involving the control or reduction of crime and juvenile delinquency, or enforcement of the criminal law, including investigative activities such as laboratory functions as well as training.”
Case 2:22-cr-14048-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:22-cr-14048-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:22-cr-14048-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:22-cr-14048-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:22-cr-14048-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:22-cr-14048-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:22-cr-14048-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:22-cr-14048-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 8 of 8
§ 102-36.185 What are the requirements for acquiring excess personal property for use by our grantees? You may furnish excess personal property for use by your grantees only when: ( a ) The grantee holds a federally sponsored project grant;
( b ) The grantee is a public agency or a nonprofit tax-exempt organization under section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501);
( c ) The property is for use in connection with the grant; and
( d ) You pay 25 percent of the original acquisition cost of the excess personal property, such funds to be deposited into the miscellaneous receipts fund of the U.S. Treasury. Exceptions to paying this 25 percent are provided in § 102-36.190. Title to property vests in the grantee when your agency pays 25 percent of the original acquisition cost.
§ 102-38.265 Must we keep records on administrative determinations? Yes, you must— ( a ) Maintain records of all administrative determinations made, to include the pertinent facts and the action taken in each case. A copy of the determination must be attached to its corresponding contract; and
( b ) Provide a signed copy of any related determination with the copy of the contract you file with the Comptroller General when requested.
§ 105-70.007 Complaint. ( a ) On or after the date the Department of Justice approves the issuance of a complaint in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(1), the reviewing official may serve a complaint on the defendant, as provided in § 105-70.008.
( b ) The complaint shall state— ( 1 ) The allegations of liability against the defendant, including the statutory basis for liability, an identification of the claims or statements that are the basis for the alleged liability, and the reasons why liability allegedly arises from such claims or statements;
( 2 ) The maximum amount of penalties and assessments for which the defendant may be held liable;
( 3 ) Instructions for filing an answer including a specific statement of the defendant's right to request a hearing by filing an answer and to be represented by a representative; and
( 4 ) That failure to file an answer within 30 days of service of the complaint will result in the imposition of the maximum amount of penalties and assessments without right to appeal, as provided in § 105-70.010.
( c ) At the same time the reviewing official serves the complaint, he or she shall serve the defendant with a copy of these regulations.
#### § 961.2 Scope of rules.

The rules in this part apply to the hearing provided by section 5 of the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 5514, challenging the Postal Service's determination of the existence or amount of an employee debt to the Postal Service, or of the terms of the employee's debt repayment schedule. In addition, these rules apply to a hearing under section 5 of the Debt Collection Act when an Administrative Law Judge or an Administrative Judge in the Judicial Officer Department is designated as the Hearing Official for a creditor Federal agency other than the Postal Service pursuant to an agreement between the Postal Service and that agency. In such cases, all references to Postal Service within these rules shall be construed to refer to the creditor Federal agency involved.
EXHIBIT 10.13
 [LETTERHEAD OF IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.]
  
   
    
    Your position will be Divisional President, Brand Products Division reporting to
Larry Hsu, PhD., President & CEO.
    
    Your position will be based at Hayward, California with an agreed upon start date of
March 31, 2008. On your first morning, please report to our administration facility at
31047 Genstar Road, Hayward CA 94544 for new hire orientation.
    
    Your starting salary will be $425,000 per year, paid biweekly.
    
    You will also receive, subject to Shareholder approval, an option to purchase stock
options of 75,000 shares of IMPAX stock and 30,000 Restricted Stock Units. These
options have a 4 year vesting schedule at 25% per year.
    
    It is the Companys intent to negotiate in good faith an employment agreement with
all senior executives as soon as it becomes current with its 10-K/10-Q filing.
    
    You are eligible to receive a relocation package of $75,000 grossed up towards any
and all relocation expenses you may incur for your move to California. The Company
will negotiate in good faith to increase if needed at the time of your moving.
However, the total relocation package will not exceed $125,000 grossed up. You and
your family need to be formally moved to the Bay Area by July 2009 or we will expect
full repayment of relocation expenses paid to you. You will receive $37,500 (that is
50% of $75,000) of relocation expenses with your first paycheck. The remaining 50%
($37,500) plus any additional negotiated amount will be paid out after you have
provided proof to HR of permanent relocation of you and your family to the San
Francisco Bay Area.
    
    The Company agrees to pay for temporary housing at a mutually agreeable location
until you move to the Bay Area, not to exceed a reasonable dollar amount determined by
the Company.
    
    You will be eligible to participate in a bonus program designed to reward you up to
75% of your annual salary, dependent on your performance and that of the Companys.
    
    Also, you are eligible to participate in the following company benefits:




---



##### 



√
    
    Kaiser or Health Net Healthcare, Delta Dental, and VSP Vision (coverage
effective the first of the month following 30 days of employment).√
    
    401(k) (participation begins the first quarter following 30 days of
continuous service).√
    
    Short- and Long  Term Disability Insurance, Life, and Accidental Death &
Dismemberment, after 90 days with the company.√
    
    20 days of Personal Time Off, and 10 Holidays designated yearly.√
    
    Eligibility to participate in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan after one
year of service at a 15% discount.√
    
    Executive Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
   HRs
confidential fax number is 510-429-2146
   
 /s/ Michael J. Nestor
Michael J. Nestor
    

Date: March
6, 2008
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 20, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1575

Lower Tribunal Nos. F17-15005B, F17-15199B

________________

Krystal Wall,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.

Krystal Wall, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before HENDON, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
June 18, 2015

Mr. David Pavlina 

1420 Celebration Boulevard, Suite 109 

Celebration, FL 34747 

Dear Mr. Pavlina: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your March 20, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0703), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure