alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE ALBERTO CRUZ-PINEDA, AKA 

Ricardo Molina-Rosales, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-72832 

Agency No. A070-162-288 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 23, 2017**

Before: McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. 

Jorge Alberto Cruz-Pineda, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to 

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-72832 

Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Cruz-Pineda’s motion to 

reopen as untimely where the motion was filed more than fifteen years after the 

BIA’s final decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Cruz-Pineda failed to 

provide evidence of a material change in circumstances in El Salvador to qualify 

for a regulatory exception to the time limitation for filing a motion to reopen, see 8 

C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); see also Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 991-92 (BIA did not 

abuse its discretion where petitioner failed to introduce material evidence)

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
7-7

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

r, Tr 17"T 7 " 

L .....''AY6)41..1.1/. ALA. 

DA 21-0253 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

KENT ALLEN TICHENOR, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

FY 

AUG 2 3 2022 

Bowen Greenwooa 

Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana 

ORDER 

Appellant Kent Allen Tichenor appeals from the March 31, 2021 Order Revoking 

Defendant's Sentence and Amended Judgment and Commitment of the First Judicial District 

Court, Lewis and Clark County. Tichenor argues the District Court imposed an illegal 

sentence by placing a parole restriction on a revocation where the underlying offense was 

committed while the 1999 statutes were in effect, there was no parole restriction in the 

original sentence, and § 46-18-203(7)(a)(iii), MCA (1999), provided that a judge may revoke 

a suspended sentence "and require the offender to serve either the sentence imposed or any 

lesser sentence." 

The State has filed a Notice of Concession that this matter should be rernanded to the 

District Court for the purpose of striking from the Amended Judgment the court's imposition 

of a parole restriction. 

Based on Tichenor's opening brief and the State's concession, and good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is remanded to the First Judicial District 

Court, Lewis and Clark County, with instructions for the District Court to strike the parole 

restriction from the March 31, 2021 Order Revoking Defendant's Sentence and Amended 

Judgment and Commitment. 

08/23/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0253
The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to 

presiding judge Honorl le Michael F. McMahon. 

Dated this C-day of August, 2022. 

(.4 0:# .4p.o.dy 

2 

Justices
V 

:^-r;ARrMENTOF 

; ;'• NSFORTATiO^i 

Garden City Area Chamber of Commerce '-'• -'-'^ ib A S^ 05 

Leading Businesses. Leading Coonnunities. 

Advocacy. Cjjporttiiuty. Impact. Fo.ras 

D.Paul Joseph 

Piesident 

Ph (620) 276-3264 

Fx(62C^ 276-3290 

July 7,2011 

Department of Transportation 

Dennis Devany 

Essential Air Service Division 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C 20590 

Dear Mr. Devany, 

The Garden City Area Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors supports the City 

of Garden City's recent decision of recommending American Eagle Airlines as the 

city's Essential Air Service (EAS) Provider. 

After discussion, the board voted unanimously to support the city's decision to 

authorize the mayor, city manager and director of Aviation to sign a recommendation 

of American Eagle to the Department of Transportation in Washington, D.C. 

The Chamber's Government Affiirs committee first discussed the idea in a 

committee meeting with Rachelle Powell, the airport manager at Garden City Regional 

Airport. The committee voted unanimously to recommend to the full board of 

directors the approval of American Eagle over four other airlines that submitted bids to 

the city. The city's action follows a study performed on air service for Garden City 

and the surrounding area. 

The Chamber imderstands that the city has been growing its airport and its service 

to appeal a broader market, And though there are drawbacks for some individuals and 

businesses that depend on flights in and out of Denver, the Chamber realizes this is 

overall best decision for the future of our community and our regional airport. 

Additionally, tlie Chamber understands the community will give up a couple more 

daily flights out of Garden City Regional Airport, but the service American Eagle 

1511 East Fulton Terrace * Garden City, Kansas 67846-6165 

P: 620) 276-3264. ext. 205 * F: 620) 276-3290 
July 18, 2011 

provides will be top-notch. The Dallas-Ft. Worth hub is excellent and the opportunity 

American Eagle brings to the table is substantial. 

While our community's recommendation wUl be considered by the DOT, the 

Chamber understands the EAS contract will not be awarded based solely on our 

recommendation. 

Hie: Letter Supponing Ot/s Anyriran Eagle EAS Oxk e 071811 

• Page 2
#### § 102-75.150 What happens when GSA determines that the report of excess is adequate?

When GSA determines that a report is adequate, GSA will accept the report and inform the landholding agency of the acceptance date. However, the landholding agency must, upon request, promptly furnish any additional information or documents relating to the property required by GSA to accomplish a transfer or a disposal.
**
**EXHIBIT 35.2**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

American Express National Bank 

American Express Credit Account Master Trust 

Reporting Period January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of American Express National Bank (“AENB”), a wholly owned subsidiary of American Express Travel RelatedServices Company, Inc. (“TRS”), pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Supplemental Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2018 (as so amended and restated and as otherwise amended from time to time, the “Agreement”),among TRS, AENB and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation III LLC, does hereby certify that: 

 
1.
AENB performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement. 

 
2.
The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate. 

 
3.
A review of AENB’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision. 

 
4.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, AENB has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed thisCertificate this 21st day of March, 2024. 

 
AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANKBy: 
/s/ Kerri Bernstein
Name: Kerri BernsteinTitle: Treasurer**
#### § 102-74.315 What is the smoking policy for interior space in Federal facilities?

Pursuant to Executive Order 13058, “Protecting Federal Employees and the Public From Exposure to Tobacco Smoke in the Federal Workplace” (3 CFR, 1997 Comp., p. 216), it is the policy of the executive branch to establish a smoke-free environment for Federal employees and members of the public visiting or using Federal facilities. The smoking of tobacco products is prohibited in all interior space owned, rented or leased by the executive branch of the Federal Government.

[73 FR 77518, Dec. 19, 2008]
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed August 5, 2022.

________________

No. 3D22-1330

Lower Tribunal No. F21-16226

________________

Ricky Willis,

Petitioner,

vs.

Cassandra Jones, etc., et al.,

Respondents.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant 

Public Defender, for petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant 

Attorney General, for respondent The State of Florida.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Ricky Willis petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus. The trial 
2

court ordered him held without bond on the charges of murder in the second 

degree and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon despite finding after 

an Arthur1 hearing that proof was not evident nor presumption great. We 

grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and direct the trial court to conduct 

a rule 3.131 pretrial release hearing. See Joseph v. Junior, 319 So. 3d 766, 

767 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021); Ginsberg v. Ryan, 60 So. 3d 475, 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2011). This decision is without prejudice for the State to file a legally 

sufficient motion for pretrial detention, should it choose to do so. See

Joseph, 319 So. 3d at 767; Ho v. State, 929 So. 2d 1155, 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 

2006). The trial court is directed to hold the hearing no later than three

business days following the issuance of this opinion. See id.

Petition granted; cause remanded.

1 State v. Arthur, 390 So.2d 717 (Fla. 1980).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

KENNETH HELMICK,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 116 WAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Childtime Learning Centers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended April 2, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
D. Davis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ William D. Davis
-----------------------------------
William D. Davis, President and
Chief Executive Officer
June 30, 2004
#### § 102-36.280 May we withdraw from the disposal process excess personal property that we have reported to GSA?

Yes, you may withdraw excess personal property from the disposal process, but only with the approval of GSA and to satisfy an internal agency requirement. Property that has been approved for transfer or donation or offered for sale by GSA may be returned to your control with proper justification.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  OF  ALLIS-CHALMERS  AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         186
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  613
<ALLOWANCES>                                   21
<INVENTORY>                                    67
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               901
<PP&E>                                         2,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          68,568
<BONDS>                                        211
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,307
<OTHER-SE>                                     (75,867)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (2,171)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,136
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (194)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.15)



</TABLE>
| Exhibit 32.1 
CERTIFICATIONS  
			Harry Kletter and Alan L. Schroering, being the Chief Executive			Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Industrial			Services of America, Inc., hereby certify as of this 13th day of			November, 2007, that the Form 10-Q/A for the Quarter ended June 30,			2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)			of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information			contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material			respects, the financial condition and results of operations of			Industrial Services of America, Inc.   
 /s/ Harry Kletter                                              
Harry Kletter, Chief			Executive Officer    
 /s/ Alan L. Schroering                                       
Alan L. Schroering, Chief			Financial Officer |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 101-26.300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policy and procedures governing the procurement by agencies of items of supply stocked by GSA, including reporting and obtaining adjustments for overages, shortages, and damages and the issue of used, repaired, and rehabilitated items in serviceable condition.

[35 FR 12721, Aug. 11, 1970]
§ 105-55.031 Prompt referral to the Department of Justice. ( a ) The General Services Administration (GSA) will promptly refer to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for litigation debts on which aggressive collection activity has been taken in accordance with § 105-55.009 and that cannot be compromised, or on which collection activity cannot be suspended or terminated, in accordance with §§ 105-55.027 and 105-55.028. GSA may refer those debts arising out of activities of, or referred or transferred for collection services to, the Agency. Debts for which the principal amount is over $1,000,000, or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest and penalties, will be referred to the Civil Division or other division responsible for litigating such debts at DOJ, Washington, DC. Debts for which the principal amount is $1,000,000, or less, or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest or penalties, will be referred to DOJ's Nationwide Central Intake Facility as required by the Claims Collection Litigation Report instructions. Debts will be referred as early as possible, consistent with aggressive GSA collection activity and the observance of the standards contained in this part, and, in any event, well within the period for initiating timely lawsuits against the debtors. GSA will make every effort to refer delinquent debts to DOJ for litigation within one year of the date such debts last became delinquent. In the case of guaranteed or insured loans, GSA will make every effort to refer these delinquent debts to DOJ for litigation within one year from the date the loan was presented to the Agency for payment or re-insurance.
( b ) DOJ has exclusive jurisdiction over the debts referred to it pursuant to this section. GSA, as the referring agency, will immediately terminate the use of any administrative collection activities to collect a debt at the time of the referral of that debt to DOJ. GSA will advise DOJ of the collection activities which have been utilized to date, and their result. GSA will refrain from having any contact with the debtor and will direct all debtor inquiries concerning the debt to DOJ, except as otherwise agreed between GSA and DOJ. GSA will immediately notify DOJ of any payments credited by the Agency to the debtor's account after referral of a debt under this section. DOJ will notify GSA of any payments it receives from the debtor.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 11

Wilmar Industries, Inc.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 


                                                                    Year Ended              Year Ended
                                                                   December 27, 1996       December 29,1995
================================================================================================================================
<S>                                                               <C>                     <C> 
Income before income taxes                                        $      9,456,372        $     4,760,462

Provision for Income Taxes (2)                                           3,593,280              1,896,000
                                                                  ----------------        ----------------      
Net Income (2)                                                    $      5,863,092        $     2,864,462
                                                                  ================        ================      


Weighted Average Shares Outstanding during the period                   11,104,618              5,404,000

Common Stock Equivalents :
   Preferred Stock                                                         192,569              1,848,439

Items issued within one year of IPO: (1)
   Common Stock                                                                                   512,500
   Stock Options                                                           260,129                172,327
                                                                  ----------------        ----------------      
Total Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                               11,557,316              7,937,266
                                                                  ================        ================      
Net Income Per Share (2)                                          $           0.51        $          0.36
                                                                  ================        ================      
</TABLE> 




(1) Common stock issued and stock options granted at prices lower then the
assumed initial public offering price within a one year period prior to an
initial public offering are included in the calculation (using the treasury
stock method and the assumed initial public offering price) as if they were
outstanding for all periods presented.

(2) Total weighted average shares outstanding for the year ended December 29, 
1995 represent pro forma number of common shares assumed outstanding during the 
year.

(3) The provision for income taxes, net income, and net income per share amounts
reflected for the year ended December 29, 1995 represents pro forma amounts as
if the Company had been subject to federal and state income taxation as a C
Corporation since inception.

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Fully diluted earnings per share differs from primary earnings per share by less
than 3%.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Roberto Martínez of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal, and requests that all papers served in this 

case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Dated: May 8, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Roberto Martínez

Roberto Martínez

Florida Bar No. 305596

Email: bob@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 179 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-74.470 What information must persons or organizations submit so that Federal agencies may consider their application for a permit? Applicants must submit the following information: ( a ) Their full names, mailing addresses, and telephone numbers.
( b ) The organization sponsoring the proposed activity.
( c ) The individual(s) responsible for supervising the activity.
( d ) Documentation showing that the applicant has authority to represent the sponsoring organization.
( e ) A description of the proposed activity, including the dates and times during which it is to be conducted and the number of persons to be involved.
#### § 102-75.1080 What must the Secretary of Agriculture do before determining that USDA-controlled excess real property and related personal property is not required for the needs of any Federal agency and prior to disposal?

The Secretary must conduct a Federal screening to determine that there is no further Federal need or requirement for the property.