alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 731

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for a five-year schedule

to double, relative to fiscal year 1999, the amount appropriated for

the National Eye Institute.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for

a five-year schedule to double, relative to fiscal year

1999, the amount appropriated for the National Eye

Institute.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Eye Institute

5 Authorization Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds that—
2

•HR 731 IH

1 (1) 80,000,000 Americans are at risk of devel2 oping diseases that potentially can cause blindness;

3 (2) 12,000,000 Americans have some degree of

4 uncorrected visual impairment;

5 (3) 1,100,000 Americans are legally blind;

6 (4) the annual direct and indirect cost of health

7 care in the United States for eye and vision dis8 orders is $42,000,000,000;

9 (5) age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is

10 the leading cause of blindness in individuals over age

11 65;

12 (6) of the 34,000,000 Americans over age 65,

13 1,700,000 have visual impairment that resulted from

14 AMD;

15 (7) AMD is expected to become an even greater

16 public health problem as the number of Americans

17 over age 65 increases dramatically over the next 30

18 years;

19 (8) diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of

20 blindness among individuals in the age group 20 to

21 74, accounting for 24,000 new cases of blindness

22 each year;

23 (9) glaucoma, another leading cause of blind24 ness, has caused 120,000 individuals in the United

25 States to become blind;
3

•HR 731 IH

1 (10) it is estimated that, of individuals in the

2 United States with glaucoma, only about 50 percent

3 are aware that they have the disease;

4 (11) more than 6,000,000 Americans suffer

5 from retinal degenerative diseases such as retinitis

6 pigmentosa, macular degeneration, Usher syndrome,

7 and Stargardt disease; and

8 (12) retinitis pigmentosa, macular degeneration,

9 Usher syndrome and Stargardt disease are inherited

10 diseases, and the number of individuals who suffer

11 from these diseases will increase dramatically.

12 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NA13 TIONAL EYE INSTITUTE; FIVE-YEAR SCHED14 ULE FOR DOUBLING OF APPROPRIATIONS

15 RELATIVE TO FISCAL YEAR 1999.

16 Subpart 9 of part C of title IV of the Public Health

17 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 285i et seq.) is amended by adding

18 at the end the following section:

19 ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

20 ‘‘SEC. 456A. For the purpose of carrying out this

21 subpart, there are authorized to be appropriated

22 $395,857,000 for fiscal year 1999, $474,857,000 for fis23 cal year 2000, $553,857,000 for fiscal year 2001,

24 $632,857,000 for fiscal year 2002, $711,857,000 for fis25 cal year 2003, and $791,714,000 for fiscal year 2004.’’.

Æ
011P15

#### Glenn R. Wilmoth v. Gilbert W. Hemric and Van W. Hemric

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-459)

Denied

Ervin, J.,

recused
No. 10-10736.

#### Miknevich *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15726]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

June 16, 2000.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 24, 2000 
to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1099.
    Form Number: IRS Form 8811.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Information Return for Real Estate Mortgage Investment 
Conduits (REMICs) and Issuers of Collateralized Debt Obligations.
    Description: Form 8811 is used to collet the name, address, and 
phone number of a representative of a REMIC who can provide brokers 
with the correct income amounts that the broker's clients must report 
on their income tax returns. The form allows the IRS to provide the 
REMIC industry the information necessary to issue correct information 
returns to investors.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 1,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:
    Recordkeeping--3 hr., 50 min.
    Learning about the law or the form--35 min.
    Preparing, copying, assembling, and sending the form to the IRS--41 
min.
    Frequency of Response: Other (One-time for each obligation.)
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 5,110 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 
5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Mary A. Able,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15726 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
§ 105-53.118 Locations of material available for public inspection. GSA maintains reading rooms containing materials available for public inspection and copying at the following locations: ( a ) General Services Administration, 18th & F Streets, NW., Library (Room 1033), Washington, DC 20405. Telephone 202-535-7788.
( b ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, 10 Causeway Street, Boston, MA 02222. Telephone: 617-565-8100.
( c ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, 26 Federal Plaza, NY, NY 10278. Telephone: 212-264-1234.
( d ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, Seventh & D Streets, SW., Room 1050, Washington, DC 20407. Telephone: 202-472-1804.
( e ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, Ninth & Market Streets, Room 5151, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Telephone: 215-597-9613.
( f ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, Richard B. Russell Federal Building, U.S. Courthouse, 75 Spring Street, SW., Atlanta, GA 30303, Telephone: 404/331-5103.
( g ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, 230 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60604. Telephone: 312-353-5383.
( h ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, 1500 East Bannister Road, Kansas City, MO 64131. Telephone: 816-926-7203.
( i ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, 819 Taylor Street, Fort Worth, TX 76102. Telephone: 817-334-3284.
( j ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225. Telephone: 303-236-7408.
( k ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, 525 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Telephone: 415-974-9000.
( l ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Room 3259, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Telephone: 213-688-3210.
( m ) Business Service Center, General Services Administration, GSA Center, Auburn, WA 98001. Telephone: 206-931-7957.
[48 FR 25200, June 6, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 24995, June 19, 1984; 50 FR 26363, June 26, 1985; 51 FR 23229, June 26, 1986; 52 FR 23657, June 24, 1987; 53 FR 23761, June 24, 1988]
#### § 102-75.20 How can Federal agencies with independent disposal authority obtain related disposal services?

Federal agencies with independent disposal authority are encouraged to obtain utilization, disposal, and related services from those agencies with expertise in real property disposal, such as GSA, as allowed by 31 U.S.C. 1535 (the Economy Act), so that they can remain focused on their core mission.
#### Leonard TAYLOR, Defendant-Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff-Below, Appellee.

No. 217, 2016

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: October 13, 2016

Decided: October 27, 2016

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware, Cr. ID No. 0907019543A

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case Number: 22-23871-CIV-MARTINEZ

MODEL ME KIDS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

MODEL-ME-KIDS, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE RESPONSE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Shushona Cooper’s Motion to Enlarge Time to 

File Response (“Motion to Enlarge Time”). (ECF No. 5). Ms. Cooper is not a party to this action, 

but she moves on behalf of Defendant Model-Me-Kids, Inc. for an extension of time for Defendant 

to respond to the Complaint. (Id. at 1). Defendant is a corporation. A corporate entity must be 

represented by counsel and cannot proceed pro se. Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 

(11th Cir. 1985). As a non-attorney, Ms. Cooper cannot act on behalf of Defendant. See id. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Enlarge Time 

is STRUCK. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to strike docket entry 5 from the docket. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 23rd day of January, 2023.

__________________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

Copies furnished to: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

All counsel of record 

Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-85.160 How does a customer agency know how much to budget for Rent? GSA normally provides customer agencies an estimate of Rent increases approximately 2 months prior to the agencies' Office of Management and Budget (OMB) submission for the fiscal year in which GSA will charge Rent. This gives the affected customer agencies an opportunity to budget for an increase or decrease. However, GSA must obtain the concurrence of OMB for such changes prior to notifying customer agencies. In the event GSA is unable to provide timely notice of a future Rent increase, customer agencies are nonetheless obligated to pay the increased Rent amount. For existing assignments in owned buildings, GSA charges for fully serviced shell Rent, in aggregate, shall not exceed the bureau level budget estimates provided to the customer agencies annually. This provision does not apply to: ( a ) New assignments;
( b ) Changes in current assignments;
( c ) Leased space;
( d ) New tenant improvement amortization;
( e ) Building specific security costs; and
( f ) New amortization of capital expenditures under ROI pricing due to changes in scope of proposed projects or repair and/or replacement of building components
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09861**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09861\09861_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09861\09861_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09861\09861_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09861\09861_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09861\09861_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09861\09861_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09861\Certification Statement Plant ID 09861.pdf Plant certification statement 09861\Supplemental Documents\09861_(A5-2) Urquhart Station Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09861\Supplemental Documents\09861_(A5-3) Urquhart WBD.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09861\Supplemental Documents\09861_(C2-13) Urquhart 3 Planned Fly Ash System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09861\Supplemental Documents\09861_(C2-19) Urquhart Fly Ash Conversion Cost.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09861\Supplemental Documents\09861_(C2-31) Urquhart 3 Existing Fly Ash System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09861\Supplemental Documents\09861_(D3-1) Urquhart Pond Diagrams.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09861\09861_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09861\09861_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
No. 11-8380.

#### Miller *v.*Trammell, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements of Endocare, Inc. pertaining to the Endocare, Inc.2004 Stock Incentive Plan, Option Grants to Craig T. DavenportPursuant to Written Compensation Agreements, Option Grants toWilliam J. Nydam Pursuant to Written Compensation Agreements,Option Grants to Michael R. Rodriguez Pursuant to WrittenCompensation Agreements and Option Grant to Katherine GreenbergPursuant to Written Compensation Agreement (Form S-8No. 333-119825), the Endocare, Inc. Amended and Restated1995 Stock Plan, the Endocare, Inc. Amended and Restated1995 Director Option Plan, the Endocare, Inc. 2002Supplemental Stock Plan and Option Grant to John V. CracchioloPursuant to Written Compensation Agreement (Form S-8No. 333-121702), of our report dated April 29, 2005,with respect to Endocare, Inc.’s management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of Endocare, Inc., included in thisForm 10-K/ A.     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPLos Angeles, CaliforniaApril 29, 2005
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Argued November 6, 2019

Decided November 12, 2019

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

AMY C. BARRETT, Circuit Judge

No. 19-1500

MEDICAL MUTUAL OF OHIO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ABBVIE INC., et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United 

States District Court for the 

Northern District of Illinois, 

Eastern Division.

No. 14 C 8857

Matthew F. Kennelly, Judge.

Order

Medical Mutual of Ohio contends in this suit under the civil-liability section of the 

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §1964, that several pharmaceutical companies promoted testosterone creams for uses other than those 

approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Physicians are free to prescribe drugs 

for off-label uses, but manufacturers are forbidden to promote those uses. 21 U.S.C. 

§§ 321(p), 355(a), 396. Manufacturers also are forbidden to make false and misleading 

statements about their products. Medical Mutual asserts that the defendants made false 

or misleading statements to promote off-label uses, causing it to pay more for these 

drugs than it would have done had the defendants lived up to their legal obligations.
No. 19-1500 Page 2

The district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 2019 U.S. 

Dist. LEXIS 24063 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 14, 2019).

Although the district court administered Medical Mutual’s suit as part of multidistrict litigation under the caption In re Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability 

Litigation, MDL 2545, it was not consolidated with any of the other suits. Thus the final 

disposition of Medical Mutual’s claims is immediately appealable. See Gelboim v. Bank of 

America Corp., 135 S. Ct. 897 (2015); Hall v. Hall, 138 S. Ct. 1118 (2018).

The district court addressed at length the possibility that Medical Mutual was adversely affected by improper statements made directly to it or its pharmacy benefits 

manager. It ruled that no reasonable jury could conclude that Medical Mutual or the 

pharmacy benefits manager relied on any of these statements. 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS

24063 at *416–52. We agree with the district court’s assessment, which need not be repeated here.

The possibility that Medical Mutual was derivatively affected by statements made to 

physicians or patients does not support liability under RICO, given the analysis of causation in Sidney Hillman Health Center v. Abbott Laboratories, 873 F.3d 574 (7th Cir. 2017).

AFFIRMED
S T A T E O F T E X A S

O F F I C E O F T H E G O V E R N O R

RICK PERRY

GOVERNOR

January 22, 2011

Mr. Lawrence E. Starfield

Administrator Deputy Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733

Dear Administrator Starfield:

I am pleased to inform you that Texas continue s to make progress with our air quality. Since 2000, Texans have seen a 53 percent reduction in industrial sources of ni trogen oxide emissions and a 27 percent reduction in ozone, both outpaci ng the national average. The Houston area recently met the eight-hour Na tional Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone for the
first time, while the Dallas/Fort Worth area is with in one part per billion of meeting the standard.

Pursuant to the requirements in Section 107(d)(3) of the Federal Clean Air Act, enclosed is the recommendation for designation of areas in Texa s with regard to the 2010 one-hour primary nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) NAAQS of 100 part s per billion.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) recommends that all counties in Texas with applicable NO 2 monitoring data (see Attachment A) be designated attainment and all other areas be designated as uncla ssifiable/attainment, based on th e three most recent years of quality-assured air data from the curren t monitoring network for the years 2007-2009.

Enclosed is a resolution, with 2009 supporting data, containing the 2010 NO 2 NAAQS designation recommendation.

If you have any questions or need additional in formation, please feel free to contact TCEQ Chairman Bryan Shaw at (512) 239-5510.

Sincerely,

Rick Perry

Governor

RP:tbpg

Enclosures cc: Bryan W. Shaw, Ph.D., Chairman, TCEQ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersigned executive officer of Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc.(the “Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|                       | /s/Jerry  D. Williams                         |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                       | Name:  Jerry D. Williams                      |
|                       | Title: President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                       |                                          |
| Date:  April 15, 2008 |                                          |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained byPeoples Community Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### § 102-38.170 May we sell Federal personal property to anyone?

Generally, you may sell Federal personal property to anyone of legal age. However, certain persons or entities are debarred or suspended from purchasing Federal property. You must not enter into a contract with such a person or entity unless your agency head or designee responsible for the disposal action determines that there is a compelling reason for such an action.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Adam M. Moskowitz

Joseph M. Kaye

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

3250 Mary Street, Suite 202

Coconut Grove, FL 33133

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

Service@moskowitz-law.com

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice)

Stephen Neal Zack

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800, Miami, FL 33131

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 206-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2023 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 206-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2023 Page 2 of 2