alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-                          Home                     
-                          Publications                     
-                 Pub Details            

        Economic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-185) 13 pp    

# America’s Diverse Family Farms: 2017 Edition

by Robert A. Hoppe

This report provides an overview of U.S. farms, including the latest statistics on production, financial performance, and farm household characteristics by farm size categories. Among the findings are that 99 percent of U.S. farms are family farms, and they accounted for 90 percent of farm production in 2016.

**Keywords:** Family farms, small farms, retirement farms, farm household income, crop insurance, government payments

**In this publication...**
          -  Entire Report 
          -  In print format (requires 8 1/2" x 11" paper) 

### Report Materials

### Complete Report PDF

                  - webdocs/publications/86198/eib-185.pdf?v=2195.9> 

### Related Amber Waves

Amber Waves3/5/2018

#### Older Operators Often Run Small Family Farms, Particularly Retirement and Low-Sales Farms

----

### Other Related

Topic9/5/2024

#### Farm Household Well-being

----

Topic9/5/2024

#### Farm Sector Income & Finances

----

Topic8/23/2024

#### Farm & Commodity Policy

----

Topic6/3/2024

#### Farm Economy

----

Topic1/29/2024

#### Farm Structure and Organization

----

Topic9/8/2023

#### Conservation Programs

----

Data9/6/2024

#### ARMS Farm Financial and Crop Production Practices

----

**Last updated:** Friday, December 15, 2017

**For more information, contact:** Robert A. Hoppe
#### § 102-118.345 Where does relief from transportation prepayment audit liability for certifying, accountable, and disbursing officers reside in my agency?

Your agency's counsel has the authority to relieve liability and give advance opinions on liability issues to certifying, accountable, and disbursing officers (31 U.S.C. 3527).
§ 105-70.020 Disclosure of documents. ( a ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant may review any relevant and material documents, transcripts, records, and other materials that relate to the allegations set out in the complaint and upon which the findings and conclusions of the investigating official under § 105-70.004(b) are based, unless such documents are subject to a privilege under Federal law. Upon payment of fees for duplication, the defendant may obtain copies of such documents.
( b ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant also may obtain a copy of all exculpatory information in the possession of the reviewing official or investigating official relating to the allegations in the complaint, even if it is contained in a document that would otherwise be privileged. If the document would otherwise be privileged, only that portion containing exculpatory information must be disclosed.
( c ) The notice sent to the Attorney General from the reviewing official as described in § 105-70.005 is not discoverable under any circumstances.
( d ) The defendant may file a motion to compel disclosure of the documents subject to the provisions of this section. Such a motion may only be filed with the ALJ following the filing of an answer pursuant to § 105-70.009.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                         560,697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 22,751,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,205,454
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,241,612
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,270,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     10,891,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,569
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,952,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,270,139
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,824,565
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,709,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,836,558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             231,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,534
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,786
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,786
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5669

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the Civil Service

Retirement and Disability Fund be excluded from the budget of the

United States Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 15, 2000

Mr. KASICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the

Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund be excluded

from the budget of the United States Government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 8348 of title 5, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(n) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the

6 receipts and disbursements of the Fund—

7 ‘‘(1) shall not be included in the totals of—
2

•HR 5669 IH

1 ‘‘(A) the budget of the United States Gov2 ernment as submitted by the President; or

3 ‘‘(B) the congressional budget (including

4 allocations of budget authority and outlays pro5 vided therein);

6 ‘‘(2) shall be exempt from any general budget

7 limitation imposed by statute on expenditures and

8 net lending (budget outlays) of the United States

9 Government; and

10 ‘‘(3) shall be exempt from any order issued

11 under part C of the Balanced Budget and Emer12 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985.’’.

Æ
```
[House Report 112-89]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]


112th Congress                                             Rept. 112-89
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     Part 2

======================================================================



 
 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 
                                  2011

                                _______
                                

 July 19, 2011.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

         Mr. Bachus, from the Committee on Financial Services, 
                        submitted the following

                          SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

                        [To accompany H.R. 1315]

                     REASON FOR SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

    This supplemental report shows the updated information for 
the Committee Consideration of H.R. 1315, as reported, (H. 
Rept. 112-89):

                        COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

    The Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer 
Credit met in open session on May 4, 2011 and ordered H.R. 
1315, Consumer Financial Protection Safety and Soundness 
Improvement Act of 2011, as amended, favorably reported to the 
Full Committee by a record vote of 13 yeas and 9 nays (Record 
vote no. FI-7).
    The Committee on Financial Services met in open session on 
May 12 and 13, 2011 and ordered H.R. 1315, the Consumer 
Financial Protection Safety and Soundness Improvement Act of 
2011, as amended, favorably reported to the House by a record 
vote of 35 yeas and 22 nays (Record vote no. FC-36).

                                  

```
A FS

- 13

- 046

- E December 05, 2012

Mr. Herman W. Sharp, Jr. 111 Cypress Point Lane Minden, LA 71055

Dear Mr. Sharp :

This letter is in response to your correspondence sent to the public docket dated October 23,

2012 (public docket No. FAA

- 2010

- 0444 ) petitioning the Federal Aviatio n Administration

for an extension to Exemption No. 10065 . That exemption from 14 Code of Federal Regulations ( CFR ) § 91.109(a) and (b)(3) allowed you to conduct certain flight instruction in Baron, Beechcraft Bonanza, Debonair, and Travel Air aircraft eq uipped with a functioning throwover control wheel instead of functioning dual controls

.

On Aug ust 31, 2011 , the FAA amended 14 CFR p art 91 related to throwover control wheels ( 76 FR 54095 ) . A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airm e n and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### ELKO REALTY COMPANY, *Petitioner, v.*COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 12632.

United States Court of Appeals . Third Circuit.

Argued Nov. 7, 1958.

Decided Nov. 17, 1958.

*950Logan Morris, Philadelphia, Pa. (John C. Noonan, Nesbit, Morris, Pugh & Noonan, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.

Myron C. Baum, Washington, D. C. (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Joseph F. Goetten, Thomas N. Chambers, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MARIS, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The taxpayer asks us to review the decision of the Tax Court that it owed deficiencies in income tax for the years 1951,1952 and 1953. The deficiencies resulted from the disallowance by the Commissioner of losses sustained by two affiliated corporations, which losses had been set off by the taxpayer against its income in consolidated returns filed by it for the years in question. The Tax Court sustained the Commissioner’s determination that the principal purpose of the acquisition of the two corporations by the taxpayer was the avoidance of Federal income taxes, that the deduction of their losses from the taxpayer’s income was accordingly forbidden by section 129(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 129(a), and that the-two corporations were in any event not. affiliates of the taxpayer privileged to-join in a consolidated return under section 141 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 141 since the taxpayer’s acquisition of them served no business purpose, as distinguished from a tax-reducing purpose.

It will be seen that the question upon which this case turns is a purely factual one, namely, whether the taxpayer acquired the two corporations in question for a bona fide business purpose or, as the Tax Court found, principally in order to reduce or avoid income taxes on its own income. The evidence is discussed' and the facts are found in the opinion filed in the Tax Court by Judge Train, 29 T.C. 1012, and will not be detailed here. We need merely say that our examination of the evidence satisfies us that the findings of the Tax Court have-substantial evidence to support them and cannot be held to be erroneous.

The decision of the Tax Court will be-affirmed.
#### § 102-38.60 Who is responsible for the costs of care and handling of the personal property before it is sold?

The holding agency is responsible for the care and handling costs of the personal property until it is removed by the buyer, the buyer's designee, or an SC. The holding agency may request the SC to perform care and handling services in accordance with their agreement. When specified in the terms and conditions of sale, the SC may charge the buyer costs for storage when the buyer is delinquent in removing the property. The amount so charged may only be retained by the holding agency performing the care and handling in accordance with § 102-38.295.

[73 FR 20803, Apr. 17, 2008]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, William L.
Walton, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ William L. WaltonName:
    William L. WaltonDate: November  8, 2007
§ 966.6 Filing, docketing and serving documents; computation of time; representation of parties. ( a ) *Filing.* After a petition is filed, all documents required under this part must be filed using the electronic filing system unless the Hearing Official permits otherwise. Documents submitted using the electronic filing system are considered filed as of the date/time (Eastern Time) reflected in the system. Documents mailed to the Recorder are considered filed on the date mailed as evidenced by a United States Postal Service postmark. Filings by any other means are considered filed upon receipt by the Recorder of a complete copy of the filing during normal business hours (Normal Recorder office business hours are between 8:45 a.m. and 4:45 p.m., Eastern Time). If both parties are participating via the electronic filing system, separate service upon the opposing party is not required. Otherwise, documents shall be served personally or by mail on the opposing party, noting on the document filed, or on the transmitting letter, that a copy has been so furnished.
( b ) *Docketing.* The Recorder will maintain a docket record of proceedings under this part and will assign each petition a docket number. After notification of the docket number, the former employee and General Counsel should refer to it on any further filings regarding the petition.
( c ) *Time computation.* A filing period under the rules in this part excludes the day the period begins, and includes the last day of the period unless the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, in which event the period runs until the close of business on the next business day. Requests for extensions of time shall be made in writing stating good cause therefor, shall represent that the moving party has contacted the opposing party about the request, or made reasonable efforts to do so, and shall indicate whether the opposing party consents to the extension.
( d ) *Representation of parties.* After the filing of the petition, further document transmittals for, or communications with, the Postal Service shall be through its representative, the General Counsel, or designee. The representative of the Postal Service, as designated by the General Counsel, shall file a notice of appearance as soon as practicable, and no later than the date for filing the answer. If a former employee has a representative, further transmissions of documents and other communications by and with the former employee shall be made through his or her representative rather than directly with the former employee.
[77 FR 65105, Oct. 25, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 54723, Sept. 11, 2015]
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of the undersigned registrant (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: January 13, 2011  American International Ventures, Inc.  /s/ Myron Goldstein Myron Goldstein Chief Financial Officer  /s/ Steven Davis Steven Davis Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Online Gaming Systems, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard Dunning, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                     |     |                                                                                       
|-------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: July 12, 2007 | By: | /s/ Richard Dunning                                                                   
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief financial Officer
Online Gaming Systems, Ltd.
Order entered September 13, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00587-CV

JOHN JEFFREY MCCAFFERTY, Appellant

V.

MARY M. MCCAFFERTY, ALANA MCCAFFERTY AND AMANDA MCCAFFERTY,

Appellees

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-08-05932

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s September 12, 2016 unopposed second motion for extension of 

time to file his brief. We ORDER appellant’s brief filed no later than September 30, 2016. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
§ 102-33.330 What must we do with aircraft parts that are excess to our needs? If aircraft parts are excess to your needs, you must: ( a ) Reassign the aircraft parts within your agency if any of your sub-agencies can use the parts; or
( b ) Report the excess parts to GSA, using Standard Form (SF) 120, “Report of Excess Personal Property” (see § 102-2.135 for information to obtain this form). When reporting excess FSCAP, you must include the manufacturer's name, date of manufacture, part number, serial number, and the appropriate Criticality Code on the SF 120. For information on reporting excess property, refer to *http://gsaxcess.gov .* (See 41 CFR part 102-36 regarding disposal of excess property.)
#### § 102-118.460 What is the time limit for my agency to file a court claim with a TSP for freight charges, reparations, and loss or damage to the property?

Statutory time limits vary depending on the mode and the service involved and may involve freight charges. The following tables list the time limits:

(a) Time Limits on Actions Taken by the Federal Government Against TSPs

| Mode | Freight charges | Reparations | Loss and damage |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (1) Rail | 3 years [49 U.S.C. 11705](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/49/11705) | 3 years [49 U.S.C. 11705](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/49/11705) | 6 years. [28 U.S.C. 2415](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/28/2415). |
| (2) Motor | 3 years 49 U.S.C. 14705(f) | 3 years 49 U.S.C. 14705(f) | 6 years. [28 U.S.C. 2415](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/28/2415). |
| (3) Freight Forwarders subject to the IC Act | 3 years 49 U.S.C. 14705(f) | 3 years 49 U.S.C. 14705(f) | 6 years. [28 U.S.C. 2415](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/28/2415). |
| (4) Water (subject to the IC Act) | 3 years 49 U.S.C. 14705(f) | 3 years 49 U.S.C. 14705(f) | 6 years. [28 U.S.C. 2415](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/28/2415). |
| (5) Water (not subject to the IC Act) | 6 years [28 U.S.C. 2415](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/28/2415) | 2 years [46 U.S.C. 821](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/46/821) | 1 year. 46 U.S.C. 1303(6) (if subject to Carriage of Goods by Sear Act, [46 U.S.C. 1300-1315](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/46/1300)). |
| (6) Domestic Air | 6 years [28 U.S.C. 2415](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/28/2415) | | 6 years. [28 U.S.C. 2415](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/28/2415). |
| (7) International Air | 6 years [28 U.S.C. 2415](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/28/2415) | | 2 years. [49 U.S.C. 40105](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/49/40105). |

(b) Time Limits on Actions Taken by the Federal Government Against TSPs Exempt From Regulation

| Mode | Freight | Reparations | Loss and damage |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (1) All | 6 years [28 U.S.C. 2415](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/28/2415) | | 6 years. [28 U.S.C. 2415](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/28/2415). |