alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 102-73.305 What relocation assistance policy must Federal agencies follow? Federal agencies, upon approval from GSA, must provide appropriate relocation assistance under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4651-4655, to eligible owners and tenants of property purchased for use by Federal agencies in accordance with the implementing regulations found in 49 CFR part 24. Appropriate relocation assistance means that the Federal agency must pay the displaced person for actual— ( a ) Reasonable moving expenses (in moving himself, his family, and business);
( b ) Direct losses of tangible personal property as a result of moving or discontinuing a business;
( c ) Reasonable expenses in searching for a replacement business or farm; and
( d ) Reasonable expenses necessary to reestablish a displaced farm, nonprofit organization, or small business at its new site, but not to exceed $10,000.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

RUDOLPH BETANCOURT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COCONUT CREEK CP, LLC and YALLA 

MARKET, INC d/b/a YALLA,

Defendants.

Case No.: 22-cv-61833-RS

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE

Plaintiff, RUDOLPH BETANCOURT, and Defendants, COCONUT CREEK CP, 

LLC and YALLA MARKET, INC d/b/a YALLA, by and their respective undersigned 

counsel, hereby notify the Court that the Parties have reached a settlement in principle. 

The Parties are in the process of memorializing their agreement and finalizing their 

settlement documents.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Glenn R. Goldstein

Glenn R. Goldstein (FBN: 55873)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Glenn R. Goldstein & Assoc., PLLC

8101 Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 504

Miami, Florida 33138

(305) 900-2373

GGoldstein@G2Legal.net

s/ Lauren N. Wassenberg

Lauren N. Wassenberg (FBN: 34083)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Lauren N. Wassenberg & Assoc., P.A.

33 SE 4th St., Ste. 100

Boca Raton, FL 33432

(561) 571-0646

WassenbergL@gmail.com

s/ Stanley D. Klett, Jr.

Stanley D. Klett, Jr.

Attorney for Defendants

Jones Foster

4741 Military Trail, Suite 200

Jupiter, Florida 33458

(561) 650 8231

SKlett@jonesfoster.com

s/ Euyelit Adriana Kostencki

Euyelit Adriana Kostencki (FBN: 84507)

Attorney for Plaintiff

EXORO LAW

101 NE 3rd Avenue, Suite 1500

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

(954) 947-0050

akostencki@exorolaw.com

Case 0:22-cv-61833-RS Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2022 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene Lorino, Appellant.

[628 NYS2d 1009]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Carey, J., at plea; Franklin Weissberg, J., at sentence), rendered March 9, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of 10 counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to 10 concurrent terms of 12x/2 to 25 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the predicate felony adjudication, and otherwise affirmed.

The People concede, and we agree, that defendant was improperly adjudicated a second felony offender, because sentence upon his predicate felony was not imposed until after the commission of the instant crimes (Penal Law § 70.06 [1] [b] [ii]). As defendant concedes, there is no reason to disturb the sentence, since defendant was also lawfully sentenced pursuant to Penal Law § 70.02 (4) for these class B armed felony offenses. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
EXHIBT
10.2


 


American
Power Group Corporation


Amendment
Number 1 To Employment Agreement


 


WHEREAS,
American Power Group Corporation (the “Company”) and Lyle Jensen entered an Employment Agreement on April 25, 2016;


 


WHEREAS,
the Company desires to make certain changes to the Employment Agreement;


 


WHEREAS,
Lyle Jensen will consider certain changes to the Employment Agreement;


 


WHEREAS,
Paragraph 11.2 of the Employment Agreement provides for amending said Employment


Agreement
if both parties concur and sign in writing;


 


NOWTHEREFORE,
the following changes have been mutually agreed to:


 


	 	1.	Paragraph
    7.4 Amounts Payable Upon Termination 


 


The
body of Paragraph 7.4 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


7.4 Amounts
Payable Upon Termination. Upon termination of the Employee’s employment with the Company in accordance with clause
(b), (d) or (e) of Section 7.1, all compensation and benefits under this Agreement will cease, effective the date of
termination. Upon termination of the Employee’s employment with the Company in accordance with clause (a) and (c) of
Section 7.1, all compensation under Sections 5.1 through 5.7 shall cease, effective upon the date of termination; provided,
however, that if (i) the Employee executes a release in favor of the Company substantially in the form annexed hereto as
Exhibit A not later than 30 days after such termination and (ii) the period in which the Employee is entitled to revoke such
release has expired without any such revocation, then, beginning on the 45th day after the date of such
termination, the Employee shall continue to receive, for a period of three months from the date of Employee’s notice of
termination given pursuant to Section 7.1(c) the following: (i) Base Salary, paid at the same salary rate being paid on the
date of termination, in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practices (with the first such payment including
all amounts due from the date of termination through the date of such first payment), and (ii) the benefits described in
Section 6. Other than as specifically set forth in Sections 6.2, 7.1, and this Section 7.4, the Employee will not be entitled
to receive any compensation or benefits after termination of his employment with the Company.


 


There
being no other changes, the balance of the Employment Agreement remains unchanged.


 


BY
SIGNATURE BELOW, the Parties hereby mutually agree to the amendment as described herein,


 


	 	Employee	 	Company
	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/
    Lyle E. Jensen	 	/s/
    Charles Coppa
	 	Lyle
    E. Jensen	 	Charles
    Coppa
	 	CEO	 	CFO
	 	 	 	 
	 	Date:	January
    11, 2017
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

     I, Thomas W. Horton, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer of AT&T Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1. The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
     September 30, 2004 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies
     fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

          2. Information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     AT&T Corp.

                                                 /s/ THOMAS W. HORTON
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Thomas W. Horton

Dated: November 4, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENTOF MOSS ADAMS LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Director and ShareholdersAltiGen Communications, Inc.

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-117000and 333-121753 of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form S-8of our report dated December 29, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof AltiGen Communications, Inc. for the year ended September 30,2006.
| /s/ MOSS  ADAMS LLP   |
|----------------------------|
| San Francisco,  California |
| December 29, 2006     |

 

----
Exhibit








Exhibit 10-t




Schedule identifying agreements substantially identical to the Form of Employment Agreement constituting Exhibit 10-s hereto entered into by Meritor, Inc. and each of the following persons:


Carl D. Anderson II
April Miller Boise
Timothy J. Heffron
Joseph Plomin
Chris Villavarayan


1
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Allied Defense Group, Inc (Allied) on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned, John G. Meyer, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer and
Charles A. Hasper as Chief Financial Officer of Allied, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Allied. /s/ Charles A. Hasper
    
    /s/ John G. Meyer, Jr.Charles A. Hasper
    
    John G. Meyer, Jr.Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    
    Chief Executive Officer and PresidentApril 25, 2005
    
    April 25, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Allied
Defense Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Allied Defense Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
November 4`h, 2010 

To: Lisa P. Jackson 

Administrator 

United States Environment Protection Agency 

Fr: Dennis Kragness 

Family Farm Owner 

Colfax, W'is. 

Dear Ms. Jackson, 

R~~~ 

2010 NOV 10 PM 12: 35 

vi 

I 

,,,- Vr 11-1 : 

~y_i~U~V'C ^r~^.-,t--, Vk. I' L "~~.-fS[I~AT 

In late October, a petition was filed in your office by the NRECA regarding the National 

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines 

rule . I am a family farmer in Wisconsin, and I support the petition . 7 

purchased a 225 kW back up generator for the farm. My primary concern was power in case of 

an outage, but as a bonus my co-op offers a peak shaving program . Occasionally the co-op asks 

me to switch to standby generation in order to decrease demand on the system . For helping them 

out when they need it, I save about $8,600 per year on my electric bill . 

The rules your agency are trying to start will take away that peak alert rate my Cooperative can 

offer. That means $8,600 out of my pocket . As a family, farm, it puts my livelihood at risk . I can 

use that savings for feed and vaccinations, helping other local small businesses in mN area. This 

rule does not just affect my cooperative . It affects me and other local businesses . 

I'd like your agency to reconsider not allowing peak shaving controls of generators like mine 

within the proposed 100 hour limits. The request NRECA filed does not ask for more hours of 

operation ; just to include peak shaving use within the 100 hour limit . Since 1'm a part of a 

Cooperative 1 see the savings and revenue from this type of arrangement, not them. Plus, I am 

helping to reduce energy demand during the peak times . This is a significant savings to my, small 

business. 

Sincerely, 

Dennis Kragness 

Colfax, Wisconsin 
7_ 

= 

t `r 

CV C: , ., C'1 iV 

. ~l 

:J ^ ^ 

; 

r r 

,r,' ~-+ N ~" ~ I 

>.. . . _. .~ 1 

:~<<~'3 4 

2'
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 173-4   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 1 of 1
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of NICE-Systems Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Dafna
Gruber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

April 14, 2008

| |  | By:        /s/ Dafna Gruber
Dafna Gruber, Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 95 The People &c., Respondent, v. James L. Carr, Appellant.

Evan M. Lumley, for appellant. Nicholas T. Texido, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. There was no error in the denial of defendant's motion to vacate the judgment. Under these circumstances, the People were not required to seek court permission under CPL 190.75 (3) before presenting additional charges to a second grand jury. We

- 1 -- 2 - No. 95

do not pass upon whether a CPL 440.10 motion lies to bring this claim, as that question is not before us. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur. Judge Fahey took no part. Decided October 19, 2017

- 2 -
§ 102-33.350 What do we need to consider for an exchange/sale of our aircraft parts? ( a ) When replacing aircraft parts through exchange/sale you— ( 1 ) Do not need approval from GSA; and
( 2 ) Must follow the provisions of this subpart and part 102-39 of this chapter.
( b ) Replacement parts do not have to be for the same type or design of aircraft, but you must use the exchange allowance or sales proceeds to purchase aircraft parts to support your aviation program which meet the “similarity” requirement in 41 CFR part 102-39.
EXHIBIT 21

                                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       State or Other
                                                                       Jurisdiction of      Percentage
                                                                       Incorporation        Ownership
                                                                       ---------------      ----------
Parent
------
<S>                                                                    <C>                  <C>
Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.                                                 Maryland               --


Subsidiary (1)
----------

The Patapsco Bank                                                      Maryland            100%


Subsidiaries of The Patapsco Bank (1)
---------------------------------

PFSL Holding Corp.                                                     Maryland            100%

Prime Business Leasing                                                 Maryland            100%

Patapsco Financial Services, Inc.                                      Maryland            100%
<FN>
----------------
(1)      The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included
         in the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report
         to Stockholders attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
</FN>
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRJCT OF FLORJDA 

CASE NO. 22-14070-CR-MARTINEZ/MA YNARD 

UNITED STATES OF AMERJCA 

vs. 

VALENTIN RAMIREZ-VELASQUEZ, 

Defendant. 

I ----------------

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CHANGE OF PLEA 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Order of Reference from the District 

Court to conduct a Change of Plea Hearing before a Magistrate Judge. 

THE MATTER was heard in front of Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard on January 

18, 2023 [ECF No: 15] at the request of the Defendant, the Defendant's Attorney, and the 

Assistant United States Attorney assigned to this case. A Report and Recommendation was filed 

on January 30, 2023, [ECF No: 19], recommending that the Defendant's plea of guilty be 

accepted. The Defendant and the Government were afforded the opportunity to file objections to 

the Report and Recommendation, however none were filed. The Court has conducted a de novo 

review of the entire file and after careful consideration, the Court affirms and adopts the Report 

and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby: 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No: 19] of 

United States Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard, is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED in 

its entirety. 

The Defendant is adjudged guilty of Count One of the Indictment. Count One charges 

him with PREVIOUSLY REMOVED ALIEN FOUND IN THE UNITED STATES, in violation 

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). The Defendant acknowledged that he understood the statutory penalties 

that apply in his case. 

Sentencing has been set in this matter on Thursday, March 16, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., 

before the Honorable District Judge Jose E. Martinez, at the Alto Lee Adams, Sr. United States 

Case 2:22-cr-14070-JEM Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/03/2023 Page 1 of 2
Courthouse, 101 South U.S. Highway 1, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34950. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this -2_ day of February 2023. 

cc: 

Hon. Magistrate Shaniek Maynard 

All Counsel of Record 

U.S. Probation Office 

JOSE 

UNITE 

Case 2:22-cr-14070-JEM Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/03/2023 Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BING XIA WANG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73048

Agency No. A098-452-289

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 13, 2014** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

 Bing Xia Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

AUG 15 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d

1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

review. 

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination,

including inconsistencies between Wang’s testimony and household register. See

Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 964 (9th Cir. 2004) (court must uphold adverse

credibility determination so long as one identified ground is supported and goes to

the heart of the claim). The agency was not compelled to accept Wang’s

explanation for the discrepancy. See Zamanov v. Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 974 (9th

Cir. 2011). Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s determination that

Wang’s claim of a well-founded fear of future persecution was undermined by his

return travel to China. See Loho v. Mukasey, 531 F.3d 1016, 1018 (9th Cir. 2008). 

In the absence of credible testimony, Wang’s asylum and withholding of removal

claims fail. See Farah, 348 F.3d at 1156. 

Because Wang’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony the BIA found

not credible, and Wang does not point to any evidence that compels the conclusion

that it is more likely than not he will be tortured if returned to China, his CAT

claim also fails. See id. at 1156-57. 

2 11-73048
Finally, we lack jurisdiction to consider Wang’s contention that the IJ

violated due process by relying on Wang’s failure to provide sufficient

corroborating evidence, because he did not raise this contention to the BIA. See

Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

3 11-73048
Innovations for Aging

Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Program Grantee

1 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2021, effective May 1, 2021

Goals

The overall purposes of this 3-year “Integrated 

Networks to Deliver and Sustain Evidence-Based 

Falls Prevention Programs” grant are to:

• Goal 1: Strengthen integrated state, 

regional, or tribal networks that address 

the social and behavioral determinants of 

health of older adults and adults with 

disabilities; and

• Goal 2: Significantly increase the number 

of older adults and adults with disabilities 

who participate in evidence-based 

community programs to reduce falls and 

falls risk.

The Juniper® network, a program 

of Trellis, and its partners will:

• Scale program capacity to meet growing 

demand and increase program 

participation across Minnesota.

• Determine the return on investment of 

falls prevention programs using Medicare 

claims data.

• Integrate programming into care settings, 

including at least 3 clinic or hospital 

locations where Juniper will place 

community health works trained in falls 

prevention programs and

offer social determinants

of health screenings and care

navigation.

• Deepen partnerships with healthcare 

organizations and the Minnesota 

Department of Health to scale healthcare 

provider referrals.

Proposed Interventions

• A Matter of Balance

• Stay Independent and Active for Life 

(SAIL)

• Stepping On

• Tai Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2021, effective May 1, 2021

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, Trellis will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• Arrowhead Area Agency on Aging 

• Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota 

• Central Minnesota Council on Aging 

• Dancing Sky Area Agency on Aging 

• HealthPartners 

• Minnesota Board on Aging 

• Minnesota Department of Health 

• Minnesota Indian Area Agency on Aging 

• Minnesota River Area Agency on Aging 

• Presbyterian Homes 

• Sanford Health

• Solid Research Group 

Anticipated Results 

Trellis and its partners propose to achieve the 

following results:

• Partner with 86 falls prevention program 

providers.

• Engage 5,883 participants across all 

programs.

• Engage 2,120 participants in A Matter of 

Balance, 967 participants in SAIL, 233

participants in Stepping On, and 2,563

participants in TJQMBB.

• Achieve a completion rate of 70% across 

all programs.

• Expand access to social determinants 

of health screening and referral through 

three clinic locations by engaging 3,700 

community members.

Contact:

Mark Cullen

Vice President of Strategy and Innovation 

for Trellis

mcullen@trellisconnects.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Ray F. Bueno, Plaintiff,

v.

University of Miami, and others,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 22-22831-Civ-Scola

Judgment

The Court has dismissed this case. (Order, ECF No. 72.) The Court now 

enters judgment in favor of the Defendant, and against the Plaintiff, as required 

by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court directs the Clerk to close this 

case.

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on August 7, 2023.

___________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:22-cv-22831-RNS Document 85 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2023 Page 1 of 1