alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                     and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Roger S. Marcus, Chief
Executive Officer, and Howard N. Feist III, Chief Financial Officer of American
Biltrite Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify that:

The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004 of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained
in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 14, 2004
                                                /s/ Roger S. Marcus
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Roger S. Marcus
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                                /s/ Howard N. Feist II
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Howard N. Feist III
                                                Chief Financial Officer


                                       48
§ 102-37.325 With whom and for what purpose(s) may a SASP enter into a cooperative agreement? Section 549(f) of title 40, United States Code allows GSA, or Federal agencies designated by GSA, to enter into cooperative agreements with SASPs to carry out the surplus property donation program. Such agreements allow GSA, or the designated Federal agencies, to use the SASP's property, facilities, personnel, or services or to furnish such resources to the SASP. For example: ( a ) Regional GSA personal property management offices, or designated Federal agencies, may enter into a cooperative agreement to assist a SASP in distributing surplus property for donation. Assistance may include: ( 1 ) Furnishing the SASP with available GSA or agency office space and related support such as office furniture and information technology equipment needed to screen and process property for donation.
( 2 ) Permitting the SASP to retain items of surplus property transferred to the SASP that are needed by the SASP in performing its donation functions (see § 102-37.270).
( b ) Regional GSA personal property management offices may help the SASP to enter into agreements with other GSA or Federal activities for the use of Federal telecommunications service or federally-owned real property and related personal property.
( c ) A SASP may enter into a cooperative agreement with GSA to conduct sales of undistributed property on behalf of GSA (see § 102-37.305).
[67 FR 2584, Jan. 18, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 23868, Apr. 25, 2006]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 8, 2022

NO. 03

- 22

- 00293

- CV

A. A. O. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE J USTI CES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the orde r signed by the tr i a l court on May 11, 2022 . Having reviewed the

record , the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted her appeal and did not comply with a

notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal fo r want of

prosecution. A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the

court below.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5582

To designate a portion of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area in Minnesota

as the ‘‘Bruce F. Vento Unit of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area

Wilderness’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 2000

Mr. OBERSTAR (for himself, Mr. SABO, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr.

RAMSTAD, Mr. MINGE, Mr. LUTHER, and Mr. GUTKNECHT) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To designate a portion of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area

in Minnesota as the ‘‘Bruce F. Vento Unit of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. BRUCE F. VENTO UNIT OF THE BOUNDARY WA4 TERS CANOE AREA WILDERNESS, MIN5 NESOTA.

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The portion of the Boundary

7 Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, Minnesota, situated north

8 and east of the Gunflint Corridor and that is bounded by

9 the United States border with Canada to the north shall
2

•HR 5582 IH

1 be known and designated as the ‘‘Bruce F. Vento Unit

2 of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness’’.

3 (b) LEGAL REFERENCE.—Any reference in a law,

4 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the

5 United States to the area referred to in paragraph (1)

6 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Bruce F. Vento

7 Unit of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38271-38272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15480]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-200-055]


Reliant Energy Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

June 14, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 8, 2000, Reliant Energy Gas Transmission 
Company (REGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to be effective 
June 9, 2000:

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 8H

    REGT states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the 
addition of a new negotiated rate contract.

[[Page 38272]]

    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said failing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15480 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81379-CIV-CANNON

CHESTER LEE ROBINSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUANCIA HERRING, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF No. 166]

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation Regarding Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Reimbursement of Pro Bono

Litigation Expenses (the “Report”) [ECF No. 166], filed on August 1, 2024. On July 16, 2024, 

Defendant filed an Unopposed Motion for Reimbursement of Pro Bono Litigation Expenses (the 

“Motion”). [ECF No. 161]. On August 1, 2024, following referral, Judge Reinhart issued a Report 

recommending that the Motion be granted [ECF No. 166 p. 2]. Objections to the Report were due 

on August 15, 2024 [ECF No. 166 p. 3]. On August 6, 2024, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a notice 

advising the Court that neither party intended to file any objections to the Report [ECF No. 168 

p. 1]. The time to file objections has now expired. [ECF No. 166 p. 3].

To challenge the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge, a party must file 

specific written objections identifying the portions of the proposed findings and recommendation 

to which objection is made. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Heath v. Jones, 863 F.2d 815, 822 

(11th Cir. 1989); Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). A district court 

reviews de novo those portions of the report to which objection is made and may accept, reject, 

Case 9:22-cv-81379-AMC Document 170 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2024 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-81379-CIV-CANNON

2

or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To the extent a party fails to object to parts of the magistrate judge’s report, 

the Court may accept the recommendation so long as there is no clear error on the face of the 

record. Macort, 208 F. App’x at 784. Legal conclusions are reviewed de novo, even in the absence 

of an objection. See LeCroy v. McNeil, 397 F. App’x 554, 556 (11th Cir. 2010); Cooper-Houston 

v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

Following de novo review, the Court finds the Report to be well reasoned and correct. For 

the reasons set forth in the Report [ECF No. 166 pp. 1–2], it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 166] is ACCEPTED.

2. The Motion [ECF No. 161] is GRANTED.

3. This case shall remain CLOSED. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 27th day of August

2024.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81379-AMC Document 170 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2024 Page 2 of 2
NOS. 07 -09-01 76-CR, 07-0 9-01 77-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL A AU GU ST 26, 2009

_________

_________

_________

___ JOSE L UIS PRADO, AP PEL LANT

V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 47 T H DI ST RI CT COU RT OF P OT T ERCOU NT Y; NO . 55, 938-A, 5 5,939-A; H ON ORABLE HA L M IN ER , J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Before CAMPBE LL a nd HANCOCK an d PIRT LE, JJ. ON M OT ION T O D ISM ISS Appel lan t, Jos e Lui s Prado, filed Not ic e of A ppeal to appeal a j udg ment c onv icti ng him of two cha rg es of

man ufactu re and deliv eryof a contro lled subst ance e nte red against him in the 47th Di str ict Cour t of Potter County , Texa s. How ev er , appell ant h as now fil ed mo tions to dismiss the app eals. Beca use the motion s me et the requireme nts of Te x as Rule of

Appe llate Proce dure 42.2( a) and thi s C our

t has not del iv ere d its deci si on pr ior to re cei v ing them, the moti ons a re hereby

g ra nted and t he appe als are di smi ss ed. Hav ing di smi ss ed th e appea ls at2

app ellant ’s req uest , no m otion s for rehea ring w ill be e nte rtaine d an d ou r ma nda tes w ill is sue.
Mackey K. Hancock Justice Do not p ubl is h.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.210-2 Complaints.

Any person who believes himself or any specific class of individuals to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by this subpart 101-6.2 may by himself or by a representative file with the responsible GSA official or his designee a written complaint. A complaint must be filed not later than 90 days from the date of the alleged discrimination, unless the time for filing is extended by the responsible GSA official or his designee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1997
<CASH>                                      31,007,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,161,533
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,359,800)
<INVENTORY>                                 24,979,935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            81,914,324
<PP&E>                                       7,464,412
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,923,523)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             108,115,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,066,221
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   102,793,984
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,244,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               108,115,305
<SALES>                                    150,792,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           150,792,516
<CGS>                                      106,604,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              106,604,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            31,140,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,580,056)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,627,462
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,393,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,234,262
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,234,262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
        

</TABLE>
§ 102-74.15 What are the facility management responsibilities of occupant agencies? Occupants of facilities under the custody and control of Federal agencies must— ( a ) Cooperate to the fullest extent with all pertinent facility procedures and regulations;
( b ) Promptly report all crimes and suspicious circumstances occurring on Federally controlled property first to the regional Federal Protective Service, and as appropriate, the local responding law enforcement authority;
( c ) Provide training to employees regarding protection and responses to emergency situations; and
( d ) Make recommendations for improving the effectiveness of protection in Federal facilities.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25173]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8926]

In the Matter of the Designation of Khan Said, also known as Khan 
Sayed, also known as Sajna Mehsud, as a Specially Designated Global 
Terrorist pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Khan Said, also 
known as Khan Sayed, also known as Sajna Mehsud, committed, or poses a 
significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the 
security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or 
economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 17, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-25173 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Argued and submitted June 21,

reversed and remanded with instructions September 6, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of William Edward O’CONNOR, *Petitioner, and*Betty Jo O’CONNOR, nka Aplet, *Respondent.*STATE OF OREGON, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES ex rel William Edward O’CONNOR, *Respondent, v.*Betty Jo O’CONNOR, nka Aplet, *Appellant.*

(123,384; CA A87007)

902 P2d 114

Ellen Gradison, Oregon Legal Services Corporation, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent Department of Human Resources.

William E. O’Connor waived appearance *pro se.*

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*539PER CURIAM

Mother appeals from a judgment denying the suspension of her child support obligation.1 An extensive discussion of the facts of this case would not benefit bench or bar. Suffice it to say, there is nothing in the record to rebut the statutory presumption that mother, who is eligible for receipt of Supplemental Security Income payments, is unable to pay the child support obligation. ORS 25.245. Accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed and remanded for entry of judgment suspending mother’s child support obligation.

1

 We do not read mother’s assignment of error as challenging the previously accrued arrearages. Those amounts are the result of final judgments and we have no power to set aside, alter or modify them. ORS 107.135(5); *Eagan and Eagan,*292 Or 492, 640 P2d 1019 (1982); *Pedroza and Pedroza,*128 Or App 102, 106, 875 P2d 478 (1994).
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.209-3 Access to sources of information.

Each recipient shall permit access by the responsible GSA official or his designee during normal business hours to such of its books, records, accounts, and other sources of information, and its facilities as may be pertinent to ascertain compliance with this subpart. Where any information required of a recipient is in the exclusive possession of any other agency, institution or person and this agency, institution or person shall fail or refuse to furnish this information, the recipient shall so certify in its report and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   Exhibit 99.09

CONTACT: JAMES W. SWENT
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           American Pad & Paper Co.
                                           (972) 733-6200
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
                                           ROBERT P. JONES/THERESA SCHILLERO
                                           LESLIE FELDMAN - PRESS
                                           (212) 850-5600
                                           Ken Pieper
                                           (972) 663-9390
                                           Morgen-Walke Associates

================================================================================
             AMERICAN PAD & PAPER COMPANY RECEIVES WAIVER EXTENSION

     DALLAS, Texas, July 31, 1998 - American Pad & Paper (NYSE:AGP) announced 
today that it has executed an amendment with its banking group waiving all the
defaults of the financial covenants of its loan agreement through September 30,
1998.

     James W. Swent, III, Chief Executive Officer said, "We are extremely 
pleased with the support we have received from our banks in working through this
issue. We will be working with the banks during the third quarter to negotiate a
permanent amendment to the current agreement that will be beneficial to all
parties.  In addition to our banks, we have received strong support from all our
vendors and customers including our independent merchants, our regional and
national chains, our contract stationers, and our superstores."

     American Pad & Paper Company is a leading manufacturer and marketer of
paper-based office products in North America.  The company manufactures and
distributes writing pads, folders, envelopes and other office products.  Name
brands include Ampad, Century, Embassy, Gold fibre, Huxley, Karolton, Kent,
Peel & Seel, SCM, Williamhouse and World Fibre.

     This release contains forward-looking statements relating to future 
results. Actual results may differ significantly as a result of factors over
which the company has no control, including the strength of domestic and foreign
economies, slower than anticipated sales growth, price and product competition
and increases in raw material costs.  Additional information which could affect
the company's financial results is included in the company's prospectus on file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                    # # #
Atlantic International Entertainment, LTD.
                    Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per Share


         Net  Earnings  (Loss) per common  share is  computed  by  dividing  net
earnings  of loss by the  Weighted  average  number of  shares  of Common  Stock
outstanding   during  each  year.  The  Company  had  Common  Stock  equivalents
outstanding  during the years ended  December 31, 1996 and 1997 in the amount of
-0- and 175,000, respectively.

                                             1997                     1996
                                          --------------------------------------

Earnings (Loss) per
Share:

Net Income (Loss)                         $ 1,047,317            $ (376,270)

Weighted average
Number of shares
Outstanding                                 9,452,992             8,514,537

Income (Loss) per share                   $      0.11            $    (0.04)

Assumed issuances
Under exercise of
Stock options and
Warrants                                    9,456,828                    (1)

Income (Loss) per
Share                                      $     0.11            $    (0.04)



(1)      During 1996 there were no common stock equivalents outstanding.
Exhibit 23

                            HENRY L. CREEL CO., INC.
                           Certified Public Accountant
                               (216) 491-0800 Fax
                                 (216) 491-0803

April 13, 2004

To Whom It May Concern:


The firm of Henry L. Creel Co., Inc., Certified Public Accountant, consents to
the incorporation by reference of its report dated April 12, 2004 on the
Financial Statements of AuGRID Corporation (the "Company") included in the
Company's report on Form 10-K for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003.



Respectfully,
/s/ Henry L. Creel





          HENRY L. CREEL, CPA 3587 LEE ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OHIO 44120