3448 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2000 / Notices

were initiated, the cause of the

deviation, an explanation of the

corrective actions taken, and when the

cause of the deviation was corrected; (3)

air temperature above the molten glass

in an uncontrolled cold top electric

furnace, including any period when the

temperature exceeds 120 °C (250 °F) at

a location 46 to 61 centimeters (18 to 24

inches) above the molten glass surface,

the date and time of the exceedance,

when corrective actions were initiated,

the cause of the exceedance, an

explanation of the corrective actions

taken, and when the cause of the

exceedance was corrected; (4)

uncontrolled glass-melting furnace (that

is not a cold top electric furnace)

parameter value(s) used to monitor

furnace performance, including any

period when the value(s) exceeds the

established limit(s), the date and time of

the exceedance, when corrective actions

were initiated, the cause of the

exceedance, an explanation of the

corrective actions taken, and when the

cause of the exceedance was corrected;

(5) the LOI and product density for each

bonded product manufactured on a RS

or FA manufacturing line, the free

formaldehyde content of each resin

shipment received and used in binder

formulation, and the binder formulation

of each batch; (6) Process parameter

level(s) for RS and FA manufacturing

lines that use process modifications to

comply with the emission standards,

including any period when the

parameter level(s) deviates from the

established limit(s), the date and time of

the deviation, when corrective actions

were initiated, the cause of the

deviation, an explanation of the

corrective actions taken, and when the

cause of the deviation was corrected; (7)

scrubber pressure drop, scrubbing liquid

flow rate, and any chemical additive

(including chemical feed rate to the

scrubber), including any period when a

parameter level(s) deviates from the

established limit(s), the date and time of

the deviation, when corrective actions

were initiated, the cause of the

deviation, an explanation of the

corrective actions taken, and when the

cause of the deviation was corrected; (8)

incinerator operating temperature and

results of periodic inspection of

incinerator components, including any

period when the temperature falls below

the established average or the inspection

identifies problems with the incinerator,

the date and time of the problem, when

corrective actions were initiated, the

cause of the problem, an explanation of

the corrective actions taken, and when

the cause of the problem was corrected;

and (9) glass pull rate, including any

period when the pull rate exceeds the

average pull rate established during the

performance test by more than 20

percent, the date and time of the

exceedance, when corrective actions

were initiated, the cause of the

exceedance, an explanation of the

corrective actions taken, and when the

cause of the exceedance was corrected.

The NESHAP general provisions (40

CFR part 63, subpart A) require that

records be maintained for at least 5

years from the date of each record. The

owner or operator must retain the

records onsite for at least 2 years but

may retain the records offsite the

remaining 3 years.

Burden Statement: There are 21

sources subject to this standard. The

total average annual hours are estimated

to be 17,800. The total average annual

cost is estimated to be $571,000. The

following is a breakdown of burden

used in the ICR. EPA estimates a two

hour burden for notification of

applicability and notification of the date

of the performance test, and a four hour

burden for the notification of

compliance status. EPA estimates an

eight hour burden for reporting of both

excess emissions and for startups,

shutdowns and malfunctions. EPA also

estimates a 16 hour burden for reporting

of monitoring exceedence. EPA also

estimates a 40 hour burden for each of

the following plans: an Operation,

Maintenance, and Monitoring Plan; a

Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction

Plan; and a Quality Improvement Plan.

For each new source, EPA estimates a

980 hour burden for the initial

performance test. Finally, EPA estimates

a 9 hour burden for maintaining all

records of information required by this

subpart.

The total nationwide capital cost

associated with monitoring for 21 plants

over the three year ICR clearance period

is estimated at $857,000. These costs

include $163,000 capital costs for a bag

leak detection system for 18 baghouses

($9,100 per baghouse leak detection

system × 18 baghouses) at 11 facilities

with $500/yr/baghouse in operation and

maintenance costs; $18,000 capital cost

for temperature monitors on 12 cold top

electric furnaces at 6 facilities ($1,500

per temperature monitoring and

recording device × 12 furnaces); and a

one-time cost of $675,000 to establish a

correlation between formaldehyde

emissions and process parameters used

to monitor compliance on affected RS

and FA manufacturing lines ($15,000

per line × 45 RS and FA manufacturing

lines). No additional cost is assumed by

EPA for a thermocouple with a strip

chart recorder for incinerators, as the

thermocouple is customarily included

in the cost of the thermal incinerator.

Other equipment used to monitor

control devices and processes are

already in-place; thus, there would be

no additional monitoring costs. The

total annualized capital cost is

$123,000, or an average of $41,000/yr

over the three year startup period. Total

annual operation and maintenance costs

associated with the monitoring

equipment is $9,000 ($500 per baghouse

leak detection system × 18 baghouses),

or an average of $3,000/yr over the three

year startup period.

Dated: January 7, 2000.

Bruce R. Weddle,

Acting Director, Office of Compliance.

[FR Doc. 00–1210 Filed 1–20–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

(ER–FRL–6250–2)

Environmental Impact Statements;

Notice of Availability

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal

Activities, General Information (202)

564–7167 or www.epa.gov/oeca/ofa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact

Statements Filed January 10, 2000

Through January 14, 2000 Pursuant to

40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 000004, Draft Supplement, FHW,

AR, TX, US 71 Highway Improvement

Project, Updated Information, between

Texarkana, (US71) Arkansas and DeQueen,

Texarkana Northern Loop Funding, Right-ofWay Approval and COE Section 404 Permit,

Little River, Miller and Sevier Counties, AR

and Bowie County, TX, Due: February 28,

2000, Contact: Elizabeth Romero (501) 324–

5309.

EIS No. 000005, Draft EIS, NPS, CA,

Merced Wild and Scenic River

Comprehensive Management Plan,

Implementation, Yosemite National Park and

the EL Portal Administrative Site, Tuolumne,

Merced, Mono, Mariposa and Madera

Counties, CA, Due: March 14, 2000, Contact:

Dave Mihalic (209) 372–0261.

EIS No. 000006, Regulatory Draft EIS, FRA,

Proposed Rule for the Use of Locomotive

Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings in

the United States, Due: May 26, 2000,

Contact: David Valenstein (202) 493–6383.

EIS No. 000007, Draft Supplement, IBR,

NM, CO, Animas-La Plata Project (ALP

Project), Municipal and Industrial Water

Supply, Reservoir Construction in Ridges

Basin, Implementation and Water

Acquisition Funding, Additional Information

concerning Project Alternatives Developed in

1996 through 1997, CO NM, Due: March 17,

2000, Contact: Mr. Pat Schumacher (970)

388–6500.

EIS No. 000008, Draft EIS, DOE, ID, Idaho

High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition,

Construction and Operation, Bannock,

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2000 / Notices 3449

Bingham, Bonneville, Butte, Clark, Jefferson

and Madison Counties, ID, Due: March 20,

2000, Contact: Thomas L., Nichmann (208)

526–0535.P=’02’≤

EIS No. 000009, Final EIS, BIA, CA,

Programmatic-Cabazon Resource Recovery

Park Section 6 General Plan, Implementation,

Approval of Master Lease and NPDES Permit,

Mecca, CA, Due: February 14, 2000, Contact:

William Allan (916) 978–6043.P=’02’≤

EIS No. 000010, Draft EIS, FHW, WV, WV–

65 Transportation Improvement Project, from

Appalachian Corridor G near Belo to US 52

at Naugatuck, Funding and COE Section 404

Permit, Mingo County, WV, Due: March 13,

2000, Contact: Thomas J. Smith (304) 347–

5928.P=’02’≤

Amended Notices

Tunas, Swordfish and Sharks, Highly

Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan,

Updated Information, Reduction of Bycatch

and Incidental Catch in the Atlantic Pelagic

Longline Fishery, Due: March 01, 2000,

Contact: Rebecca J. Lent (301) 713–2347.P=’02’≤

FR notice published on 12/30/1999: CEQ

Comment Date extended from 2/14/2000 to

03/01/2000.P=’02’≤

EIS No. 990500, Draft Supplement, UAF,

FL, Homestead Air Force Base (AFB)

Disposal and Reuse Updated and Additional

Information on Disposal of Portions of the

Former Homestead (AFB), Implementation,

Dade County, FL, Due: March 07, 2000,

Contact: Frank Duncan (703) 696–5243.

Published–FR–01–07–00 Correction to

Comment date from 02–21–2000 to 03–07–

2000.

Dated: January 18, 2000.

B. Katherine Biggs,

Associate Director, NEPA Compliance

Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 00–1519 Filed 1–20–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[ER–FRL–6250–3]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared January 03, 2000 Through

January 07, 2000 pursuant to the

Environmental Review Process (ERP),

under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act

and Section 102(2)(c) of the National

Environmental Policy Act as amended.

Requests for copies of EPA comments

can be directed to the Office of Federal

Activities at (202) 564–7167. An

explanation of the ratings assigned to

draft environmental impact statements

(EISs) was published in FR dated April

09, 1999 (63 FR 17856).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–AFS–L65336–ID Rating

EC1, Brown Creek Timber Sale Project,

Implementation, Payette National

Forest, New Meadow Ranger District,

Adam County, ID.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns regarding

cutting timber in the Patrick Butte

Roadless Area and recommended the

alternative which avoids entry into the

roadless area.

ERP No. D–COE–K36051–AZ Rating

EC2, Rio de Flag Flood Control Study,

Improvement Flood Protection, City of

Flagstaff, Coconino County, AZ.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns over potential

impacts to wetlands and requested

additional information regarding the

extent of wetlands affected by the

proposed project and measures to avoid

and minimize impacts to wetlands.

ERP No. D–IBR–K64018–CA Rating

LO, Lower Mokelumne River

Restoration Program, Implementation,

Resource Management Plan, San

Joaquin County, CA.

Summary: EPA has no objections. The

project provides benefits to fisheries and

the Lower Mokelumne River ecosystem.

ERP No. D–NAS–A11075–00 Rating

LO, Mars Surveyor 2001 Mission,

Implementation, Orbit Spacecraft

Launched from Vandenberg Air Force

Base, CA; Delta II 7925 Launch Vehicle

in March/April 2001 and a Lander/

Rover Spacecraft Launched from Cape

Canaveral Air Station, FL; CA and FL.

Summary: EPA has no objection to the

proposed action.

Final EISs

ERP No. F–AFS–L65320–00 Targhee

National Forest Open Road and Open

Motorized Trail Analysis, To Implement

a new Travel Plan, several counties, ID

and Lincoln and Teton Counties, WY.

Summary: The final EIS addressed

most of EPA’s comments on the draft

EIS. However, our comment on the

regulations found at 36 CFR 295 was not

addressed and EPA remains concerned

about potential environmental impacts

from roads and opened motorized trails.

ERP No. F–NPS–H65006–NB

Homestead National Monument of

America, General Management Plan,

Implementation, Gage County, NB.

Summary: EPA has no objections to

the proposed General Management Plan.

ERP No. FA–FHW–H40108–IA.

Central Business District Loop Arterial

Construction, Harding Road and I–235

to US 65 at Scott Avenue, Funding and

404 Permit, Polk County, IA

Summary: EPA concluded that the

project modifications posed little impact

to the environment. Additional noise

testing may be warranted as the project

progresses.

Regulations

ERP No. R–FAA–A59013–00 FAA

Order 1050.1E, Policies and Procedures,

Includes Additions or changes to the

current version of FAA Order 1050.1D.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concern that certain

sections of the Order were either not in

agreement or are misinterpretations of

the CEQ regulations. EPA requested that

those sections be rewritten.

Dated: January 18, 2000.

B. Katherine Biggs,

Associate Director, NEPA Compliance

Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 00–1520 Filed 1–20–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[OPP–00640; FRL–6489–1]

Inaugural Meeting of the Tribal

Pesticide Program Council (TPPC);

Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

SUMMARY: The Tribal Pesticide Program

Council (TPPC) will hold a 2–day

meeting, beginning on January 25, 2000

and ending on January 26, 2000. This

notice announces the location and times

for the meeting and sets forth the

tentative agenda topics.

DATES: The meeting will be held on

January 25, 2000 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.,

and January 26, 2000 from 8 a.m. to 4

p.m. The Tribal Caucus will hold

sessions that are closed to EPA and the

General Public on January 25, 2000 from

2 p.m. to 4:30 and January 26, 2000 from

3 p.m. to 3:30 p.m..

Requests to participate in the meeting

may be received until January 25, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at

the Embassy Suites Hotel - Crystal City,

the Capitol Hill Room, 1300 Jefferson

Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.

Requests to participate may be

submitted by mail, electronically, or in

person. Please follow the detailed

instructions for each method as

provided in Unit III. of the

‘‘SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.’’

To ensure proper receipt by EPA, your

request must identify docket control

number OPP–00640 in the subject line

on the first page of your response.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lillian Wilmore, TPPC Facilitator, P.O.

Box 470829; Brookline Village, MA.

02447–0829; telephone number (617)

232–5742; Fax Number (617) 277–1656;