alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5335 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5335

     To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require 
  candidates for election for Federal office to raise the majority of 
   their contributions from individuals who reside in the State the 
         candidate seeks to represent, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2000

 Mr. English introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require 
  candidates for election for Federal office to raise the majority of 
   their contributions from individuals who reside in the State the 
         candidate seeks to represent, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING MAJORITY OF CANDIDATE FUNDS TO COME FROM 
              INDIVIDUALS RESIDING IN STATE INVOLVED.

    Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
441a) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i)(1) With respect to each reporting period for an election, the 
total of contributions accepted by a candidate for the office of 
Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, 
the Congress from in-State individual residents shall be at least 50 
percent of the total of contributions accepted from all sources.
    ``(2) As used in this subsection, the term `in-State individual 
resident' means an individual who resides in the State in which the 
Senate seat or congressional district involved (as the case may be) is 
located.''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING BUNDLING OF CONTRIBUTIONS.

    Section 315(a)(8) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 
U.S.C. 441a(a)(8)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(8) No person may make a contribution through an intermediary or 
conduit, except that a person may facilitate a contribution by 
providing--
            ``(A) advice to another person as to how the other person 
        may make a contribution; and
            ``(B) addressed mailing material or similar items to 
        another person for use by the other person in making a 
        contribution.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
elections occurring after December 31, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
SUBSIDIARIES
      OF THE COMPANY




HINES
      HORTICULTURE, INC.


Exhibit
        21.1


List
      of
      Subsidiaries of Hines Horticulture, Inc.





The
      following is a list of subsidiaries of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the “Company”).
      The common stock of all the corporations listed below are wholly owned, directly
      or indirectly, by the Company. If indented, the corporation is a wholly-owned
      subsidiary of the corporation under which it is listed.




Name of
              Corporation
            Jurisdiction
                of
                IncorporationHines Horticulture, Inc.
            DelawareHines
                Nurseries, Inc.
            California
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, James S. Pak., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, Vie Financial
Group, Inc.s Annual Report, as amended, on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report, as amended, on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vie Financial Group, Inc.



|                    |  |       
|------------------- |  | ------
|Date: July 29, 2003 |  | By:   
|                    |  | Name: 
|                    |  | Title:



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vie Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by Vie Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
**U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Washington, D.C. 20460** 

**OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES A** **ND TOXIC SUBSTA** **NCES** PC Code: 123802 DP Code s : 403954 October 22 , 2012

**MEMORANDUM SUBJECT**  : Fomesafen Drinking Water Assessment for a new IR

- 4 U se on Cantaloupe,

Cucumber, Pea, Succulent pea , Pumpkin, Summer squash, Watermelon, Winter squash, and S ucculent s oy bean (Edamame) **TO:** Barbara Madden , Risk Manager

Laura Nollen , Risk Manager Reviewer Registration Division (7505P) **FROM:** He Zhong, Ph.D. , Biologist

Environmental Risk Branch I Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) **APPROVED** Ed Odenkirchen , Ph. D., Acting Branch Chief **BY :**  Sujatha Sankula, Ph.D., Lead Biologist

Environmental Risk Branch I Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) 

### Summary This assessment provides estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWC) for fomefaen (trade name: Reflex ® H erbicide ) in both surface water and ground water in support of human health risk assessment s for a new IR

- 4 use on cantaloupe, cucumber, pea, succulent pea , pumpkin, summer squash, watermelon, winter squash, and succulent soy bean (Edamame)

. Based on the proposed supplemental label (EPA Reg. No. 100

- 993) , a maximum of 1.5 pts/acre of the formulated product (0.3 75 lbs a.i./acre or 0.4 2 kg a.i./ha) may be applied annually

preemergence and postemergence as broadcast application by aerial and ground sp ray in the EPA regions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. According to the preliminary data from Tier

- II PRZM/EXAM modeling and EDWCs for the same application rate from the previous DW assessments for fomesafen on pepper,2

cotton, soy

beans, dry

beans, snap beans, potato and tomato (USEPA 2010 , DP 373599, 373601 and USEPA 2009, DP 365204) at the PCA 0.87 , the proposed EDWCs are not expected to supersede the previous upper bound EDWC values (USEPA 2005, DP 322213)

. Therefore, EFED continues to recommend the previous upper bound EDWC values for surface source drinking water concentrations of **34.8 μg/L** for peak (acute), **13.1 μg/L** for annual average (non

cancer chronic), and 30

- year annual average concentration of **6.5 μg/L** (cancer chronic). EFED also recommends using the ground water monitoring concentration of **1 μg/**L as the benchmark concentration for fomesafen in ground water source drinking water because it represents actual use conditions of fomesafen on so ybeans on a vulnerable soil. 

### References USEPA. 2005. Revised Tier II Drinking Water Assessment for Fomesafen use on cotton, Soy beans, Dry

Bean, and Snap Beans. DP Barcodes: 322213. pp. 20. USEPA. 2009. Drinking Water Assessment for Fomesafen use on cotton, soy beans, dry

beans, snap beans, potato and tomato, DP Barcode: 365204. pp 41. USEPA. 2010. Drinking Water Assessment for Fomesafen Use on Pepper. DP Barcode: 373599, 373601. pp11
#### § 102-39.90 Where do I obtain additional information?

Additional information is provided at the GSA websites *www.gsa.gov/bulletin* and *www.gsa.gov/exchangesale.*

[88 FR 25511, Apr. 27, 2023]
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

HITESMAN, GASTON, and KOVAC, 

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Emmanuel R. RIVAS

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 201900162

Decided: 30 October 2019.

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.

Military Judge: Major Terrence J. Reese, USMC. Sentence adjudged 

26 March 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps 

Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by the convening authority: reduction to 

E-1, confinement for 150 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: Commander C. Eric Roper, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
United States v. Rivas, No. 201900162

2

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
#### § 105-71.104 Effect on other issuances.

All other grants administration provisions of codified program regulations, program manuals, handbooks and other nonregulatory materials which are inconsistent with this part are superseded, except to the extent they are required by statute, or authorized in accordance with the exception provision in § 105-71.105.
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 171-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25/2023 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allis-Chalmers Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Munawar H. Hidayatallah, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Company, certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Munawar H. Hidayatallah
         -----------------------
         Munawar H. Hidayatallah
         Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 101-4.410 Comparable facilities.

A recipient may provide separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex, but such facilities provided for students of one sex shall be comparable to such facilities provided for students of the other sex.
Editorial Note on Part 101-8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-8.718 Investigation. ( a ) *Informal investigation.* GSA investigates complaints that are unresolved after mediation or are reopened because of a violation of a mediation agreement. As part of the initial investigation, GSA uses informal factfinding methods, including joint or separate discussions with the complainant and the recipient, to establish the fact and, if possible, settle the complaint on terms that are mutually agreeable to the parties. GSA may seek the assistance of any involved State agency. GSA puts any agreement in writing and has it signed by the parties and an authorized official designated by the Administrator or the Director, Office of Organization and Personnel. The settlement may not affect the operation of any other enforcement efforts of GSA, including compliance reviews and investigation of other complaints that may involve the recipient. The settlement is not a finding of discrimination against a recipient.
( b ) *Formal investigation.* If GSA cannot resolve the complaint through informal investigation, it begins to develop formal findings through further investigation of the complaint. If the investigation indicates a violation of these regulations, GSA attempts to obtain voluntary compliance. If GSA cannot obtain voluntary compliance, it begins enforcement as described in § 101-8.720.
City of Miami

t

Master Report

a

Enactment Number: R- 22- 0131

City Hall

3500 Pan American Drive

Miami, FL 33133

www. miamigov. com

File Number: 11751 File Type: Resolution Status: ADOPTED

Revision: Controlling Body: City Commission

File Name: Redistricting - Adoption of New City Commission Introduced: 3/ 25/ 2022

District Boundaries

Requesting Dept: City Commission Final Action Date: 3/ 24/ 2022

Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT( S), 

PROVIDING THE NEW JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY COMMISSION

DISTRICTS FOLLOWING THE RESULTS OF THE 2020 UNITED STATES CENSUS; 

OFFICIALLY DELINEATING THE BOUNDARIES OF EACH DISTRICT AS SET FORTH

IN " EXHIBIT 1," ATTACHED AND INCORPORATED; MAKING FINDINGS; AND

PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 

Notes: 

Links: 

Attachments: 11751 Exhibit 1 ( PDF) 

History of Legislative File: 

Revision: Acting Body: Date: Action: Result: 

City Commission 3/ 24/ 2022

City Commission 3/ 24/ 2022

Mayor' s Office 4/ 3/ 2022

City Clerk' s Office 4/ 3/ 2022

Victoria Mendez 4/ 19/ 2022

City Clerk' s Office 4/ 19/ 2022

Meeting Completed

ADOPTED Passed

Unsigned by the Mayor Completed

Signed and Attested by the City Completed

Clerk

Approved Form and Completed

Correctness

Rendered Completed

City of Miami Page 1 of 1 Printed on: 412012022

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 171-12 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 1
# ACTION:

 Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

# SUMMARY:

 The Defense Science Board Task Force on Global Positioning Systems will meet in closed session on January 12-13, January 20-21, and January 24-25, 2000, at 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will receive briefings and discuss interim findings and tentative recommendations resulting from ongoing activities.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings, concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (1) (1994), and that accordingly these meetings will be closed to the public. However, due to critical mission requirements for a report by the end of January, the Task force is unable to provide timely notice of the above mentioned meetings.

Dated: January 14, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-1545 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-24013 

CHENMING ZHOU, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS 

AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED 

ON SCHEDULE “A”, 

Defendants. 

 /

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO 

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING 

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Jiyuan Zhang, Esq., Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District 

of Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having 

considered the motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 

1. The Motion is GRANTED. 

2. Jiyuan Zhang, Esq., may appear and participate in this action on behalf of Micnaron 

LLC (#268), Carperipher (#283), SSAWcasa (#271), Outamateur (#278), yadi-001 

(#259). 

3. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to Jiyuan Zhang, 

Esq., at contact@jzhanglaws.com. 

Case 1:22-cv-24013-RNS Document 56-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 2
4. The following attorney, who maintains an office in this District, is designated and 

approved as local counsel with whom the Court and opposing counsel can readily 

communicate regarding the conduct of the case and upon whom papers shall be 

served: Jianyin Liu, Esq. the Law Offices of James Liu PLLC at 15750 SW 92nd Ave 

Unit 20C Palmetto Bay, FL 33157, jamesliulaw@gmail.com. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at , Florida, this 

day of . 

 

 ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR. 

United States District Judge 

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record 

Case 1:22-cv-24013-RNS Document 56-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 37709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA No. 00-1208, MM Docket No. 97-116; RM-9050 & RM-9123]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Estero, Everglades City, LaBelle, 
and Key West, FL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to a petition filed by Keith L. Reising a Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making was issued proposing the allotment of Channel 
224A at Everglades City, Florida. See 62 FR 22900, April 28, 1997. In 
response to a counterproposal filed by InterMart Broadcasting West 
Coast, Inc., this document substitutes Channel 223C3 for Channel 223A 
at LaBelle, Florida, reallots Channel 223C3 to Estero, Florida, and 
modifies the license for Station WWWD to specify Estero as its 
community of license. The coordinates for Chanel 223C3 at Estero are 
26-21-50 and 81-46-00. To accommodate the channel at Estero, we have 
substituted Channel 224C1 for Channel 223C1 at Key West, Florida, and 
modified the license for Station WEOW accordingly. The coordinates for 
Channel 224C1 at Key West are 24-40-35 and 81-30-41. The proposal for 
Everglades City is dismissed as it has been determined that a first 
local service at Estero will serve a larger population than an 
allotment at Everglades City. With this action, this proceeding is 
terminated.

DATES: Effective July 17, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 97-116, adopted May 24, 2000, and released 
June 2, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the 
Commission's Reference Center, 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800, 
facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Florida, is 
amended by removing LaBelle, Channel 223C1 and adding Estero, Channel 
223C3 and by removing Channel 223C1 and adding Channel 224C1 at Key 
West.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-15261 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### § 102-2.65 When may agencies deviate from the FMR?

Because, it consists primarily of set policies and mandatory requirements, deviation from the FMR should occur infrequently. However, to address unique circumstances or to test the effectiveness of potential policy changes, agencies may be able to deviate from the FMR after following the steps described in § 102-2.80.
§ 102-80.115 Is there more than one option for establishing that an equivalent level of safety exists? Yes, the following are three options for establishing that an equivalent level of safety exists: ( a ) In the first option, the margin of safety provided by various alternatives is compared to that obtained for a code complying building with complete sprinkler protection. The margin of safety is the difference between the available safe egress time and the required safe egress time. Available safe egress time is the time available for evacuation of occupants to an area of safety prior to the onset of untenable conditions in occupied areas or the egress pathways. The required safe egress time is the time required by occupants to move from their positions at the start of the fire to areas of safety. Available safe egress times would be developed based on analysis of a number of assumed reasonable worst case fire scenarios including assessment of a code complying fully sprinklered building. Additional analysis would be used to determine the expected required safe egress times for the various scenarios. If the margin of safety plus an appropriate safety factor is greater for an alternative than for the fully sprinklered building, then the alternative should provide an equivalent level of safety.
( b ) A second alternative is applicable for typical office and residential scenarios. In these situations, complete sprinkler protection can be expected to prevent flashover in the room of fire origin, limit fire size to no more than 1 megawatt (950 Btu/sec), and prevent flames from leaving the room of origin. The times required for each of these conditions to occur in the area of interest must be determined. The shortest of these three times would become the time available for escape. The difference between the minimum time available for escape and the time required for evacuation of building occupants would be the target margin of safety. Various alternative protection strategies would have to be evaluated to determine their impact on the times at which hazardous conditions developed in the spaces of interest and the times required for egress. If a combination of fire protection systems provides a margin of safety equal to or greater than the target margin of safety, then the combination could be judged to provide an equivalent level of safety.
( c ) As a third option, other technical analysis procedures, as approved by the responsible agency head, can be used to show equivalency.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00055-CR

David FINO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CR-11172

The Honorable Angus McGinty, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE HILBIG1, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED April 17, 2013.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

 1 Justice Hilbig not participating.