### 9777 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2011 / Notices

NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is 202–566–1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is 202–566–
1742.

Use EPA’s electronic docket and comment system at http:// www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then key in the docket ID number identified above. Please note that EPA’s policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, confidential business information (CBI), or other information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For further information about the electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov

.

Title: The SunWise Program (Renewal).

ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1904.06, OMB Control No. 2060–0439.

ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on 2/28/2011. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and are displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.

Abstract: The goal of the SunWise School Program is to teach children and their caregivers how to protect themselves from overexposure to the sun. The SunWise Program recognizes the challenge of measuring the progress and evaluating the effectiveness of an environmental and public health education program where the ultimate goal is to reduce risk and improve public health. Therefore, the continual and careful evaluation of program effectiveness through a variety of means,including data from pre- and postintervention surveys, tracking and monitoring of classroom activities and school policies, and consultation with experts, is necessary to monitor progress and refine the program. Surveys to be developed and administered include: (1) Teacher questionnaire for measuring their and their students’ receptivity to the educational component of the Program; (2) Teacher individual interview component soliciting more information about the program and the development of a recognition and incentives program; (3) Don’t Fry Day pledge asking educators to pledge to incorporate sun safety into their spring and summer activities; (4) Online interactive SunWise Sun Safety Certification Program enabling students, adults, organizations, and employers to develop credentials on sun safety awareness and behaviors; and (5) Partner pilot questionnaire for measuring their and their audience’s receptivity to the educational component of the Program. The data will be analyzed and results will indicate the Program’s effect on participants’ sun-protection attitudes and behaviors, and will help guide the program’s further improvement. Additionally, information is collected when educators sign up to receive a Tool Kit either on the Web or in person, and when individuals participate in an on-line sun safety tutorial/certification program. Responses to the collection of information are voluntary. All responses to the collection of information remain confidential, and where appropriate
anonymous.

Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average less than one hour per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

Respondents/Affected Entities: Elementary and middle school students, parents, and educators. Estimated Number of Respondents: 8,960.

Frequency of Response: annual.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 1,615 hours.

Estimated Total Annual Cost: $100,172, which includes no annualized capital or O&M costs.

Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 195 hours annually in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. More hours were added for teachers participating in an individual interview. Hours were subtracted for teachers administering the student survey. Hours were added for teachers participating in the Don’t Fry Day pledge. Hours and burden for educators is about the same; hours for students has also decreased significantly. The bottom line burden hours increased along with the total
cost.

Dated: February 14, 2011. John Moses, Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2011–3869 Filed 2–18–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–1196; FRL–9269–5]**

**Recent Postings of Broadly Applicable Alternative Test Methods** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of availability.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces the broadly applicable alternative test method approval decisions that EPA has made under and in support of New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) in
2010.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For questions about this notice, contact Lula H. Melton, Air Quality Assessment Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (E143–02), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number: 919–541–2910; fax number: 919–541–0516; e-mail address: melton.lula@epa.gov. For technical questions about individual alternative test method decisions, refer to the contact person identified in the individual approval documents.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 


### 9778 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2011 / Notices

I. General Information A. Does this notice apply to me?

This notice will be of interest to entities regulated under 40 Code of Federal Regulations(CFR) parts 60, 61, and 63; State, local and Tribal agencies; and EPA Regional Offices responsible for implementation and enforcement of regulations under 40 CFR parts 60, 61, and 63. B. How can I get copies of this information?

Copies of the broadly applicable alternative test method approval documents are available from EPA’s Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/ approalt.html. II. Background

Broadly applicable alternative test method approval decisions made by EPA in 2010 under the NSPS, 40 CFR part 60 and the NESHAP, 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 are identified in this notice (see Table 1). Source owners and operators may voluntarily use these broadly applicable alternative test methods subject to their specific applicability. Use of these broadly applicable alternative test methods does not change the applicable emission standards.

As explained in a previous Federal Register notice published at 72 FR 4257 (January 30, 2007) and found on EPA’s Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/ approalt.html, the EPA Administrator has the authority to approve the use of alternative test methods to comply with requirements under 40 CFR parts 60, 61, and 63. This authority is found in sections 60.8(b)(3), 61.13(h)(1)(ii), and 63.7(e)(2)(ii). In the past, we have performed thorough technical reviews of numerous requests for alternatives and modifications to test methods and procedures. Based on these experiences, we have often found that these changes or alternatives would be equally valid and appropriate to apply to other sources within a particular class, category or subcategory. Consequently, we have concluded that, where a method modification or an alternative method is clearly broadly applicable to a class, category or subcategory of sources, it is both more equitable and efficient to approve its use for all appropriate sources and situations at the same time.

It is important to clarify that alternative methods are not mandatory but permissive. Sources are not required to employ such a method but may choose to do so in appropriate cases. Source owners or operators should review the specific broadly applicable alternative method approval decision on EPA’s Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ ttn/emc/approalt.html before electing to employ it. As per 63.7(f)(5), by electing to use an alternative method for 40 CFR part 63 standards, the source owner or operator must use the alternative method until approved otherwise.

The criteria for approval and procedures for submission and review of broadly applicable alternative test methods are outlined at 72 FR 4257 (January 30, 2007). We will continue to announce approvals for broadly applicable alternative test methods on EPA’s Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ ttn/emc/approalt.html and annually publish a notice that summarizes approvals for broadly applicable alternative test methods. This notice comprises a summary of sixteen such approval documents added to our technology transfer network from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010. The alternative method decision letter or memo number, the reference method affected, sources allowed to use this alternative, and the modification or alternative method allowed are summarized in Table 1 of this notice. Please refer to the complete copies of these approval documents available from EPA’s Web site at http:// www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/approalt.html as the table serves only as a brief summary of the broadly applicable alternative test methods. If you are aware of reasons why a particular alternative test method approval that we issue should not be broadly applicable, we request that you make us aware of the reasons in writing and we will revisit the broad approval. Any objection to a broadly applicable alternative test method, as well as the resolution of that objection, will be announced on EPA’s Web site at http:// www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/approalt.html and in the subsequent Federal Register notice. If we should decide to retract a broadly applicable test method, we would continue to grant case-by-case approvals, as appropriate, and would (as States, local and Tribal agencies and EPA Regional Offices should) consider the need for an appropriate transitionperiod for users either to request caseby-case approval or to transition to an approved method.

Dated: February 15, 2011. Mary Henigin, Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.



### TABLE 

### 1—A PPROVED 

### A LTERNATIVE 

### T EST 

### M ETHODS AND 

### M ODIFICATIONS TO 

### T EST 

### M ETHODS 

### R EFERENCED IN OR 

### P UBLISHED 

### U NDER 

### A PPENDICES IN 

### 40 CFR PARTS 

### 60, 61, AND 

### 63 M ADE 

### B ETWEEN 

### J ANUARY 

### 2010 AND 

### D ECEMBER 

### 2010

Alternative

methoddecision letter/memo No. As an alternative or modification to . . . For . . . You may . . .

ALT–064 ....... SW–846 Method 0023A—SamplingMethod for Polychlorinated Dibenzo-pDioxins and PolychlorinatedDibenzofuran Emissions from Stationary Sources. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart EEE—National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors. Omit the methylene chloride rinse, and combine acetone and toluene rinses.

ALT–065 ....... SW–846 Method 0011—Sampling forSelected Aldehyde and Ketone Emissions from Stationary Sources. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart EEE—National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors. Use Method 320 in lieu of SW–846 Method 0011.

SW–846 Method 0023A—Sampling

Method for Polychlorinated Dibenzo-pDioxins and PolychlorinatedDibenzofuran Emissions from Stationary Sources. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart EEE—National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors. Use Method 23 in lieu of SW–846 Method 0023A.

ALT–066 ....... Method 18—Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound Emissions by Gas Chromatography. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ—Standards of Performance for Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines. Use TECO Model 55C analyzer to measure methane.


### 9779 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2011 / Notices

TABLE 

### 1—A PPROVED 

### A LTERNATIVE 

### T EST 

### M ETHODS AND 

### M ODIFICATIONS TO 

### T EST 

### M ETHODS 

### R EFERENCED IN OR 

### P UB



### LISHED 

### U NDER 

### A PPENDICES IN 

### 40 CFR PARTS 

### 60, 61, AND 

### 63 M ADE 

### B ETWEEN 

### J ANUARY 

### 2010 AND 

### D ECEMBER 

### 2010—Continued

Alternative

methoddecision letter/memo No. As an alternative or modification to . . . For . . . You may . . .

ALT–067 ....... Method 5A—Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions from the AsphaltProcessing and Asphalt Roofing Industry. Asphalt processing and manufacturing sources subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart UU; 40 CFR part 63, subpart LLLLL; and 40 CFR part 60, subpart AAAAAAA. Use 1-bromopropane in lieu of 1,1,1-trichloroethane specified in Method 5A.

ALT–069 ....... Performance Specification 4B—Specifications and Test Procedures for Carbon Monoxide and Oxygen Continuous Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart EEE, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors. Use Method 3A in lieu of Method 3B as specified in Performance Specification 4B.

6.4.1 of Appendix to Subpart EEE of Part

63—Quality Assurance Procedures for Continuous Emissions Monitors Used for Hazardous Waste Combustors. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart EEE, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors. Forego the use of Method 4 when both CEMS and RM systems are on a ‘‘dry’’basis during RATAs and during compliance monitoring with the dry basis CEMS. ALT–070 ....... Method 7—Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from Stationary Sources. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart G, Standards of Performance for Nitric Acid Plants. Use Method 320 in lieu of Method 7 with the following caveats: (1) Ensure that no condensation be allowed to form inthe sampling line by heating the sampling line up to and including the FTIR sampling cell, (2) follow the quality control procedures in Section 9.0 of Method 320 for all the compounds ofinterest, and (3) ensure that the recovery values are within acceptable limits as defined by Method 320.ALT–071 ....... Method 16A—Determination of Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (Impinger Techniques). Sources subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart BB—Standards of Performance for Kraft Pulp Mills. Use proposed Method 16C or an alternative procedure to Method 16Awherein the titration analysis is replaced with a sulfur dioxide analyzer. ALT–072 ....... Method 18—Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound Emissions by Gas Chromatography. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart GGGGG, National EmissionStandards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Site Remediation. Use Method 25A in lieu of Method 18.

ALT–073 ....... Method 2—Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate(Type S Pitot Tube), Method 2A—Direct Measurement of Gas VolumeThrough Pipes and Small Ducts, Method 2C—Determination of Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate in Small Stacks or Ducts (Standard Pitot Tube), or Method 2D—Measurement of Gas Volume Flow Rates in Small Pipes and Ducts. Sources subject to 40 CFR parts 60.18 and 63.11(b). Use the mass flow meter in lieu of Method 2, 2A, 2C, or 2D to measure the flow rate for exit velocity at regulatedflares as long as the calibration certification is in compliance with the manufacturer recommended frequency.

ALT–074 ....... Method 15—Determination of Hydrogen Sulfide, Carbonyl Sulfide, and Carbon Disulfide Emissions from Stationary Sources. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart UUUU, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Cellulose Products Manufacturing. Use an alternative sampling procedurewherein composite samples are collected in tedlar bags in lieu of direct interface to the gas chromatograph as required in Method 15. ALT–075 ....... Using a NOX CEMS for the initial 30-day compliance test as specified in 60.46b(e). Sources subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart Db, Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units. Use a PEMS in lieu of a CEMS for the initial 30-day compliance test provided that the requirements of PS–16 are met, and the PEMS input sensors are operated in their established ranges over the 30-day test period. ALT–076 ....... Method 18—Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound Emissions by Gas Chromatography. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart KKK, Standards of Performancefor Equipment Leaks of VOC from Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants. Use GPA Method 2261 in lieu of Method 18 to meet the requirements of 40 CFR part 60.18(f)(3).

ALT–077 ....... Method 316—Sampling and Analysis forFormaldehyde Emissions from Stationary Sources in the Mineral Wool and Wool Fiberglass Industries. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHH, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants forWet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production. Use Method 320 in lieu of Method 316.


### 9780 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2011 / Notices

TABLE 

### 1—A PPROVED 

### A LTERNATIVE 

### T EST 

### M ETHODS AND 

### M ODIFICATIONS TO 

### T EST 

### M ETHODS 

### R EFERENCED IN OR 

### P UB



### LISHED 

### U NDER 

### A PPENDICES IN 

### 40 CFR PARTS 

### 60, 61, AND 

### 63 M ADE 

### B ETWEEN 

### J ANUARY 

### 2010 AND 

### D ECEMBER 

### 2010—Continued

Alternative

methoddecision letter/memo No. As an alternative or modification to . . . For . . . You may . . .

Method 318—Extractive FTIR Method for

the Measurement of Emissions from the Mineral Wool and Wool Fiberglass Industries. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHH, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants forWet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production. Use Method 320 in lieu of Method 318.

ALT–078 ....... Procedures outlined in 40 CFR 60.4241(i). Sources subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ—Standards of Performance for Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines. Use the TECO Model 55C analyzer tomeasure non-methane organic compounds in lieu of using a flame-ionization detector with a non-methane cutter as specified in 40 CFR 60.4241(i). ALT–079 ....... NCASI 94.02—Chilled Impinger/Silica Gel Tube Test Method at Pulp MillSources for Methanol, Acetone, Acetaldehyde, Methyl Ethyl Ketone, and Formaldehyde. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart S, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Pulp and Paper Industry. Use the method titled ‘‘Selected HAPS in Condensates by GC/FID (NCASI Method DI/HAPS–99.01 ’’ in lieu of NCASI 94.02.

ALT–080 ....... Method 2—Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate(Type S Pitot Tube), Method 2A—Direct Measurement of Gas VolumeThrough Pipes and Small Ducts, Method 2C—Determination of Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate in Small Stacks or Ducts (Standard Pitot Tube), or Method 2D—Measurement of Gas Volume Flow Rates in Small Pipes and Ducts. Sources subject to 40 CFR part 60.18 and 63.11(b). Use an ultrasonic flow meter in lieu of Method 2, 2A, 2C, or 2D to measure the flare flow rate for exit velocity atregulated flares as long as the calibration certification is in compliance withthe manufacturer recommended frequency.

Source owners or operators should review the specific broadly applicable alternative method approval letter on the EPA’s Web site at http:// www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/approalt.html before electing to employ it.

[FR Doc. 2011–3863 Filed 2–18–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9268–6; EPA–HQ–OEI–2010–0747]**

**Notification of Deletion of System of Records; EPA Parking Control Office**  **File (EPA–10) and EPA Transit and Guaranteed Ride Home Program Files**  **(EPA–35)**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is deleting the systems of records for EPA Parking Control Office File (EPA–10), published in the Federal Register on January 25, 1978 (43 FR 3502) and EPA Transit and Guaranteed Ride Home Program Files (EPA–35) published in the Federal Register on February 22, 2002. The personally identifiable information in these systems has been integrated into the Office of Administrative Services Information System (OASIS) (EPA–41).

**DATES :**  This notice is effective immediately upon publication in the Federal Register

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ray Lee, IT Specialist, Resources Management Staff (RMS) Team Lead, Office of Administration, OARM, (202) 564–4625 or Jackie Brown, IT Specialist, Office of Administration, RMS, OARM, (202) 564–0313, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Mail Code 3201A, Washington, DC 20460.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. General Information How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OEI–2010–0747 copies of the available docket materials are available either electronically through http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Docket in the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566–

1745.

Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.

Dated: February 3, 2011. Malcolm D. Jackson, Assistant Administrator and Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–3860 Filed 2–18–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM**

**Consumer Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting** 

The Consumer Advisory Council will meet on Thursday, March 10, 2011. The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will take place at the Federal Reserve Board’s offices in Washington, DC, in Dining Room E on the Terrace Level of the Martin Building. For security purposes, anyone planning to attend the meeting should register no later than Tuesday, March 8, by completing the form found online at: