alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 95-5873 ERIC REYNARD HOSKINS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-52) Submitted: September 24, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL William C. Ingram, Jr., FLOYD, ALLEN & JACOBS, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Timika Shafeek, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: The Appellant, Eric Hoskins, pleaded guilty to possession with theintent to distribute cocaine but appeals the district court's order denying his motion to suppress the cocaine found on his person during drug interdiction activities at the Piedmont International Airport in Greensboro, North Carolina. Hoskins contends that police detective Kennedy's actions of questioning him after he deplaned from a flightfrom Newark, New Jersey, and conducting a search of Hoskins's person after viewing a suspicious bulge under Hoskins's arm was a violation of the Fourth Amendment. The district court found that Hoskins voluntarily consented to speak to Kennedy and freely gave permission to Kennedy to search his person. After a complete review of the district court's decision to deny Hoskins's motion to suppress, 1 we find no reversible error and affirm the district court's order.Hoskins was not "seized" under the Fourth Amendment when Kennedy asked if Hoskins would speak with him and answer a few questions. The record supports the conclusion that from Hoskins'sperspective, and that of Kennedy's, Hoskins was free to refuse the initial request for questioning and the subsequent search of his person. Hoskins's voluntary cooperation with such requests does not, absent coercive circumstances not present here, implicate the Fourth Amendment. 2 Accordingly, we find that the search and seizure of the cocaine in this matter was lawful and in accordance with the Constitution. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentionsare adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

_________________________________________________________________ 1 United States v. Han , 74 F.3d 537, 540 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 64 U.S.L.W. 3807 (U.S. June 3, 1996) (No. 95-8891). 2 Florida v. Royer , 460 U.S. 491, 497-98 (1983); United States v. Mendenhall , 446 U.S. 544, 555-56 (1980).
2
§ 102-74.525 May Federal agencies reserve time periods for the use of public areas for official Government business or for maintenance, repair and construction? Yes, Federal agencies may reserve certain time periods for use of public areas— ( a ) For official Government business; or
( b ) For maintenance, repair, and construction.
#### § 102-80.145 What is meant by “flashover”?

Flashover means fire conditions in a confined area where the upper gas layer temperature reaches 600 °C (1100 °F) and the heat flux at floor level exceeds 20 kW/m2 (1.8 Btu/ft2/sec).
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The undersigned officer of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange
Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A)
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.


Date: March 23, 2005           By:  /S/ CLAUDIA M. PIEROPAN
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Claudia M. Pieropan
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
                                    and Treasurer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15702]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 17, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, NW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Cumberland Bancshares, Inc., Hartsville, Tennessee; to acquire 
51 percent of the voting shares of Academy Bank (in organization), 
Lebanon, Tennessee.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Amana Bancshares, Inc., Southfield, Michigan; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Amana 
Bank (in organization), Dearborn, Michigan.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 16, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-15702 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 656 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 656

                   To guarantee honesty in budgeting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1999

Mr. Stearns (for himself and Ms. Rivers) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   To guarantee honesty in budgeting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honest Balanced Budget Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The social security system runs an annual surplus that 
        is invested in Government bonds. The Treasury thus borrows the 
        surplus and spends these monies on programs unrelated to social 
        security.
            (2) In fact, when the projected annual social security 
        trust fund surplus is removed from the baseline calculations 
        through 2004, a cumulative 5-year deficit is added to the 
        national debt.
            (3) The Congressional Budget Office projects that the 
        annual deficit will increase dramatically over the 5-year 
        budget cycle and, further, the fictional social security trust 
        fund balance will also rise during this period.

SEC. 3. SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND PROTECTION.

    The receipts and disbursements of the social security trust funds 
included in the gross Federal debt shall not be--
            (1) included in the Federal budget baseline for any fiscal 
        year; and
            (2) counted as new budget authority, outlays, receipts, or 
        deficit or surplus for purposes of--
                    (A) offsetting any tax decrease; and
                    (B) offsetting any spending increase.
                                 <all>
```
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 1995-2
$ 247,582,941 5.80% Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998




         PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
            DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %
        ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-98   4,863,199     423,140     145,948    2.10%    4,495,315    5.39%
 Feb-98   4,597,590     399,634     202,408    3.08%    4,052,582    5.14%
 Mar-98   4,538,383     377,412     189,199    3.05%    3,657,286    4.91%
 Apr-98   5,047,377     355,477     113,966    1.97%    3,490,299    5.03%
 May-98   4,431,206     331,081     149,993    2.77%    3,365,167    5.18%
 Jun-98   4,082,535     309,664      70,977    1.40%    3,002,878    4.93%
 Jul-98   3,993,616     289,931      30,249    0.64%    2,828,423    4.97%
 Aug-98   3,988,840     270,629     117,809    2.67%    2,708,252    5.12%
 Sep-98   3,596,975     251,350      96,453    2.35%    2,537,957    5.16%
 Oct-98   3,455,311     233,964      42,756    1.12%    2,347,789    5.14%
 Nov-98   3,114,252     217,264      51,390    1.45%    2,418,829    5.69%
 Dec-98   3,050,813     202,211      40,478    1.23%    2,352,878    5.97%
        ____________ ___________ ___________
 Totals  48,760,097   3,661,757   1,251,626

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the
      information is from activity of the previous month.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12                           ( print page 38832)                        CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).                 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than July 6, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Phillip Jackson, Applications Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                 

*1. Michael Robert Reese,*                     Appleton, Wisconsin; to retain voting shares of Fox River Valley Bancorp, Inc., Appleton, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of First Business Bank of Fox River Valley, Appleton, Wisconsin.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 16, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-15701 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58

QPM#

AIR-ANM-ll30-F7

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

.20' 0 - o2';l.l~ FDMS Docket No. FAA-ZOO__ - _

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date

ATA Joe White November-12-2009

Boeing Long Beach Jim Finn November~06·2009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List 10Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
Case 1:22-cr-20414-RNS   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2023   Page 1 of 7

Case 1:22-cr-20414-RNS   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2023   Page 2 of 7

Case 1:22-cr-20414-RNS   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2023   Page 3 of 7

Case 1:22-cr-20414-RNS   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2023   Page 4 of 7

Case 1:22-cr-20414-RNS   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2023   Page 5 of 7

Case 1:22-cr-20414-RNS   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2023   Page 6 of 7

Case 1:22-cr-20414-RNS   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2023   Page 7 of 7
§ 101-25.109-2 Equipment pools. ( a ) The provisions of this § 101-25.109-2 apply to Federal laboratories which occupy an area of 10,000 square feet or more and employ 25 or more technical or scientific personnel.
( b ) Equipment pools shall be established in Federal laboratories so that laboratory and research equipment can be shared or allocated on a temporary basis to laboratory activities and individuals whose average use does not warrant the assignment of the equipment on a permanent basis. In determining the number and location of equipment pools, consideration shall be given to economy of operation, mobility of equipment, accessibility to users, frequency of use of the equipment, and impact on research programs. Pooling operations should begin expeditiously, within 120 days, if feasible, following decisions regarding the number and location of pools. If it is determined that an equipment pool would not be practical or economical or for any other reason is not needed at a particular laboratory, a written report supporting that determination shall be submitted to the agency head or his designee. Federal laboratories which do not meet the size and staffing criteria in § 101-25.109-2(a) should also establish equipment pools whenever feasible; however, these facilities need not submit written reports regarding determinations not to establish pools.
( c ) Where the establishment of a physical pool would be economically unfeasible due to excessive transportation and handling costs, limited personnel resources, or limited space, pooling may be accomplished by means of equipment listings. Consideration should be given to the establishment of a laboratory advisory committee consisting of technical and management personnel to determine the types of equipment to be shared or pooled and to identify equipment that is no longer required. ( 1 ) Equipment pools may also be used to fill requests for temporary replacements while permanently assigned equipment is being repaired or to provide equipment for new laboratories pending acquisition of permanent equipment.
( 2 ) Although specific pieces of laboratory equipment may not be available for assignment to equipment pools, they may be available for sharing or loan. Information concerning the availability of this equipment can be maintained at a central location such as the equipment pools.
( d ) Unless determined unnecessary by the agency head or his designee, each Federal laboratory operating equipment pools shall prepare and submit to the agency head or his designee an annual report concerning the use and effectiveness of equipment pooling.
( e ) The agency head or his designee shall ensure compliance by responsible personnel with the provisions of this § 101-25.109-2 and shall require that periodic independent reviews of equipment pool operations in Federal laboratories under his control be conducted to determine their effectiveness and to effect modifications as appropriate.
[43 FR 29004, July 5, 1978]
#### § 105-60.804 Fee schedule.

Table 1 to § 105-60.804 outlines the basic fee categories and applicable fees:

| Requester category | Search fees | Review fees | Duplication fees | Amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (a) Commercial use requester | Yes | Yes | Yes, first 100 pages, or equivalent volume without charge. Then, U.S. $0.10. per copy of each page (not larger than 8.5 x 14 inches) reproduced by photocopy or similar means (includes costs of personnel and equipment)—OR, per copy prepared by any other method of duplication—actual direct cost of production | $49.00/hour plus applicable duplication costs. |
| (b) Educational and noncommercial scientific institutions | No | No | Yes, first 100 pages, or equivalent volume without charge. Then, U.S. $0.10. per copy of each page (not larger than 8.5 x 14 inches) reproduced by photocopy or similar means (includes costs of personnel and equipment)—OR, per copy prepared by any other method of duplication—actual direct cost of production | Eligible requesters not subject to fees other than duplication costs. |
| (c) Representative of news media | No | No | Yes, first 100 pages, or equivalent volume without charge. Then, U.S. $0.10. per copy of each page (not larger than 8.5 x 14 inches) reproduced by photocopy or similar means (includes costs of personnel and equipment)—OR, per copy prepared by any other method of duplication—actual direct cost of production | Eligible requesters not subject to fees other than duplication costs. |
| (d) All other requesters | Yes (first 2 hours without charge) | No | Yes, first 100 pages, or equivalent volume without charge. Then, U.S. $0.10. per copy of each page (not larger than 8.5 x 14 inches) reproduced by photocopy or similar means (includes costs of personnel and equipment)—OR, per copy prepared by any other method of duplication—actual direct cost of production | $49.00/hour plus applicable duplication costs. |

Table 1 to § 105-60.804—Fee Requester Category Table

Note 1 to § 105-60.804:

GSA's calculated hourly rate for manual search, computer operator/programmer time, and employee time spent reviewing records is set at a flat rate of 49.00 per hour. GSA charges for these FOIA services by the hour at $49.00 and half hour at $24.50.

Note 2 to § 105-60.804:

The fee schedule of this section does not apply to fees charged under any statute that specifically requires GSA to set and collect fees for particular types of records. In instances where records responsive to a request are subject to a statutorily based fee schedule program, GSA shall inform the requester of the contact information for that program.

Note 3 to § 105-60.804:

If GSA utilizes a contractor or agency personnel outside of the FOIA Requester Service Center to perform any services described in this subpart, the standard fee is based on the equivalent hourly rates.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Online Gaming Systems, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard Dunning, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                        |     |                                                                                       
|----------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 15, 2007 | By: | /s/ Richard Dunning                                                                   
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer
Online Gaming Systems, Ltd.
§ 105-60.1001 Purpose and scope of subpart. ( a ) By virtue of the authority vested in the Administrator of General Services by 5 U.S.C. 301 and 41 U.S.C. 121(c) this subpart establishes instructions and procedures to be followed by current and former employees of the General Services Administration in response to subpoenas or similar demands issued in judicial or administrative proceedings for production or disclosure of material or information obtained as part of the performance of a person's official duties or because of the person's official status. Nothing in these instructions applies to responses to subpoenas or demands issued by the Congress or in Federal grand jury proceedings.
( b ) This subpart provides instructions regarding the internal operations of GSA and the conduct of its employees, and is not intended and does not, and may not, be relied upon to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against GSA.