alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 102-85.180 Can there be other standard services?

GSA may provide additional services to its customers at the levels and times deemed by the Administrator of General Services to be necessary for efficient operations and proper servicing of space under the assignment responsibility of GSA.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRelative control effectiveness technique with application to airplane control coordinationA method to select optimal combinations of the control variables of a linear system is reported. The combinations are chosen so that the control channels have their principal influences on selected fundamental modes of the system. A series of algebraic maximization problems is used to maximize the effects of the control channels on selected modes while simultaneously minimizing the effects on the remaining modes. The method is applied to the lateral and directional control of a linearized airplane model having ailerons, a rudder, and differential tail surfaces. Integration of these control eliminates oscillations present in the roll rate for a step lateral-control input and improves the sideslip response with reduced rolling motions for a step directional-control input. Inclusion of thrust-vectoring engine nozzles improves the roll rate capability of the airplane.Document ID19850015442Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsLallman, F. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1985Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2416NASA-TP-2416L-15864Accession Number85N23753Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-34-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850015442.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Request for Information SNCLavalin Constructors Inc. (FAA-2015-4196) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Smith: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−4196). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your

petition.

z Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This 

information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by December 9, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 11:33 AM 

To: Shawn.Smith@snclavalin.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO.: 22-23961-DPG 

DAMIAN R. JOSEFSBERG, individually 

and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and 

CHECKR, INC., 

Defendants. 

/ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Sarah J. Cohen of the law firm of Hogan Lovells US LLP, 

without waiver but rather with an express reservation of any and all defenses available to 

Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (“Uber”), appears as counsel for Uber and requests 

that all papers served in this case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Respectfully submitted, 

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 

600 Brickell Avenue 

Suite 2700 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 459-6500 

Facsimile: (305) 459-6550 

By: /s/ Sarah J. Cohen

Sarah J. Cohen 

Fla. Bar No. 1010683 

sarah.cohen@hoganlovells.com 

Counsel for Uber Technologies, Inc. 

Case 1:22-cv-23961-DPG Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 23, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. Copies of the foregoing document 

will be served upon interested counsel via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated 

by CM/ECF. 

By: /s/ Sarah J. Cohen

Case 1:22-cv-23961-DPG Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2023 Page 2 of 2
**-- -~**  **Taylorville** 

### (TAZ) .AMEMLI5K1J C l ass E , ?OO 'AG L and a bove

. 29122

·9 G Ra di o: 122 . 8 CTA F 

### Springfield: Abraham , Lincoln Capital (SPI)

6 Class C , CT 121.3 , CTAF

122 . 95 

### Coffeen Power Station I llinois Power Ge n Stack : 119 1'MS L 

### I 575 'AG L Class G Airspace to 1200'A GL Radio : 122.8 CTA F



### . Vandalia (VLA)

Radio : C T AF 122 . 8 

### Litchfield (3LF) Ra d io : C T A F 1 22.8

Loogootee StPeter
§ 102-79.110 What Integrated Workplace policy must Federal agencies strive to promote? Federal agencies must strive to design work places that— ( a ) Are developed using sustainable development concepts (see § 102-76.55);
( b ) Align with the organization's mission and strategic plan;
( c ) Serve the needs and work practices of the occupants;
( d ) Can be quickly and inexpensively adjusted by the user to maximize his or her productivity and satisfaction;
( e ) Are comfortable, efficient, and technologically advanced and allow people to accomplish their work in the most efficient way;
( f ) Meet the office's needs and can justify its cost through the benefits gained;
( g ) Are developed with an integrated building systems approach;
( h ) Are based on a life cycle cost analysis that considers both facility and human capital costs over a substantial time period; and
( i ) Support alternative workplace arrangements, including telecommuting, hoteling, virtual offices, and other distributive work arrangements (see part 102-74, subpart F—Telework).
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00068-CV

OBADIAH KINARA, Appellant

V.

DAVID ONGERA, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Probate Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (2021-PR00264-2)

November 17, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

It is further ordered that appellant Obadiah Kinara shall bear the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
#### § 70.05-20 Report required.

Whenever any vessel collides with an aid to navigation established and maintained by the United States or any private aid to navigation established or maintained in accordance with part 64, 66, 67, or 118 of this chapter, or is connected with any such collision, it shall be the duty of the person in charge of such vessel to report the accident to the nearest Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, in accordance with 46 CFR part 4.

[CGFR 58-17, 23 FR 3383, May 20, 1958, as amended by CGFR 61-55, 26 FR 12572, Dec. 28, 1961; CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33362, June 19, 1997; USCG-2022-0323, 88 FR 10028, Feb. 16, 2023]
Part II, Section B, 1(a) Operation Description
#### § 105-53.134 Office of Administration.

The Office of Administration, headed by the Associate Administrator for Administration, participates in the executive leadership of the agency; providing advice on the formulation of major policies and procedures, particularly those of a critical or controversial nature, to the Administrator and Deputy Administrator. The Office plans and administers programs in organization, productivity improvement, position management, training, staffing, position classification and pay administration, employee relations, workers' compensation, career development, GSA internal security, reporting requirements, regulations, internal directives, records correspondence procedures, Privacy and Freedom of Information Acts, printing and duplicating, mail, telecommunications, graphic design, cooperative administrative support, and support for congressional field offices. The office also serves as the central point of control for audit and inspection reports from the Inspector General and the Comptroller General of the United States; and manages the GSA internal controls evaluation, improvement, and reporting program. In addition, the office includes a secretariat to oversee Federal advisory committees.

[54 FR 26741, June 26, 1989]
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 212-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2023 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:22-cv-22845-JEM   Document 43   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2024   Page 1 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22845-JEM   Document 43   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2024   Page 2 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22845-JEM   Document 43   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2024   Page 3 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22845-JEM   Document 43   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2024   Page 4 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22845-JEM   Document 43   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2024   Page 5 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22845-JEM   Document 43   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2024   Page 6 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22845-JEM   Document 43   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2024   Page 7 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22845-JEM   Document 43   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2024   Page 8 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22845-JEM   Document 43   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2024   Page 9 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22845-JEM   Document 43   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2024   Page 10 of 10
§ 105-55.015 Collection in installments. ( a ) Whenever feasible, the General Services Administration (GSA) will collect the total amount of a debt in one lump sum. If a debtor is financially unable to pay a debt in one lump sum, GSA may accept payment in regular installments. GSA may obtain financial statements from debtors who represent they are unable to pay in one lump sum and independently verify such representations whenever possible (see § 105-55.020(g)). When GSA agrees to accept payments in regular installments, a legally enforceable written agreement from the debtor will be obtained specifying all of the terms of the arrangement and containing a provision accelerating the debt in the event of default. If the debtor's financial statement discloses the ownership of assets which are free and clear of liens or security interests, or assets in which the debtor owns an equity, the debtor may be asked to secure the payment of an installment note by executing a Security Agreement and Financing Statement transferring to the United States a security interest in the asset until the debt is paid.
( b ) The size and frequency of installment payments will bear a reasonable relation to the size of the debt and the debtor's ability to pay. The installment payments will be sufficient in size and frequency to liquidate the debt in three years or less, unless circumstances warrant a longer period.
( c ) Security for deferred payments may be obtained in appropriate cases. GSA may accept installment payments notwithstanding the refusal of the debtor to execute a written agreement or to give security, at the Agency's option.
Exhibit 99

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Biltrite Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Roger
S. Marcus, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Howard N. Feist III,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


 /s/ Roger S. Marcus
---------------------------
Name: Roger S. Marcus
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 14, 2002


/s/ Howard N. Feist III
-----------------------------
Name: Howard N. Feist III
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 14, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 102-42.145 When is public sale of a foreign gift or decoration authorized? A public sale is authorized if a foreign gift or decoration: ( a ) Survives Federal utilization screening;
( b ) Is not purchased by the employee;
( c ) Survives donation screening; and
( d ) Is approved by the Secretary of State or designee.
EXHIBIT B

Case 1:23-cv-20045-RKA Document 19-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:23-cv-20045-RKA Document 19-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:23-cv-20045-RKA Document 19-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023 Page 3 of 3
Order entered July 16, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00072-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

LAWRENCE CLARK SANDLIN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-82012-2012

ORDER

Appellee’s July 14, 2014 motion for extension of time to file appellee’s brief is 

GRANTED. Appellant’s brief received by the Clerk of the Court on July 14, 2014 is DEEMED

timely filed on the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000132 29-JUL-2016 07:58 AM
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of NICE-Systems Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Haim
Shani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

April 5, 2009

| |  | By:      /s/ Haim Shani
Haim Shani, Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of NICE-Systems Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Haim
Shani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

June 13, 2007

| |  | /s/ Haim Shani
Haim Shani, Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cv-10108-ALTMAN/Reid

SALTPONDS CONDOMINIUM

ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROCKHILL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

On December 21, 2022, we held a status conference to discuss the Notice of Related Action 

some of our Defendants had filed. See Notice of Related Action [ECF No. 3]; Paperless Minute Entry

[ECF No. 25]. For the reasons stated on the record during the status conference, the Court hereby 

ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows:

1. This case is CLOSED and STAYED for 60 days while the Plaintiff moves for leave 

to amend its complaint in the related case, Saltponds Condominium Association, Inc. v. 

Rockhill Insurance Company, Case No. 4:20-cv-10063-JEM. 

2. The Plaintiff shall inform this Court that it has filed the motion in the amended case

by filing a notice on our docket. Thirty days after filing that motion, the Plaintiff shall 

update the court with a status report.

3. If the motion for leave to amend is not adjudicated by February 20, 2023, the Plaintiff 

shall move for a 30-day extension of the stay. That motion for an extension must 

include each Defendant’s position on the extension. 

Case 4:22-cv-10108-RKA Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2023 Page 1 of 2
4. If, by February 20, 2023, the Plaintiff hasn’t moved for leave to amend, we’ll dismiss 

this case for failure to comply with our Order. 

5. If the anticipated appraisal award moots the issues raised in this case, the Plaintiff shall 

promptly file a notice of voluntary dismissal.

6. All pending hearings and deadlines are TERMINATED, and all pending motions are 

DENIED as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 9, 2023.

_________________________________

ROY K. ALTMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 4:22-cv-10108-RKA Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2023 Page 2 of 2
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNPUBLISHED

April 15, 2021

v No. 351688

Oakland Circuit Court

RONALD MARK DRAUGHN, LC No. 2015-256768-FH

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: BECKERING, P.J., and FORT HOOD and RIORDAN, JJ.

BECKERING, P.J. (concurring).

I concur in the result only.

/s/ Jane M. Beckering
EXHIBIT 99.1.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of the registrant certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 2002 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



Date: July 10, 2003

American International Ventures, Inc.





/s/ Jack Wagenti
Jack Wagenti

Principal Accounting Officer and

Principal Executive Officer
Carroll

No. 78-179

#### Stephen E. Piane v. Town of Conway

December 20, 1978

*884
      *Maurice D. Geiger,*of North Conway, by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

*Peter G. Hastings,*of Fryeburg, Maine, by brief and orally, for the defendant.

Memorandum

This case involves an ordinance adopted by Conway to keep certain street vendors out of certain high traffic areas.

The challenged Conway ordinance is valid as a traffic control ordinance, a proper exercise of the police power delegated to the town by the legislature. RSA 31:39; *Club Jolliet, Inc. v. Manchester,*110 N.H. 172, 175-76, 262 A.2d 844, 846-47 (1970). Although the ordinance affects hawkers and peddlers, whose activities may only be directly regulated under RSA 31:102-a (Supp. 1977), the record strongly suggests that the town fathers were acting to relieve traffic congestion, not to impinge upon the rights of private entrepreneurs. *See generally, Stamper v. Town of Hanover,*118 N.H. 241, 385 A.2d 1213 (1970).

This matter comes here prior to a final hearing on the merits. Superior court rule RSA 491:App. R. 88 (Supp. 1977), now R. 96, specifically discourages interlocutory appeals in criminal cases, limiting them narrowly to exceptional circumstances in the discretion of the court. We encourage superior court judges to look less favorably upon parties’ requests for interlocutory appeals in civil cases as well, and to exercise their appropriate function by rendering a final verdict before allowing the parties to bring their exceptions to us. Such a policy better applies judicial resources. *See generally State v. Goff,*118 N.H. 724, 393 A.2d 562 (1978); *State v. Doyle,*117 N.H. 789, 378 A.2d 1379 (1977).

*Dismissed.*
0-cr-06241-WJZ Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2000 Pa
§ 959.9 Filing documents for the record. ( a ) All documents required under this part must be filed using the electronic filing system unless the presiding officer permits otherwise. If both parties are participating in the electronic filing system, separate service upon the opposing party is not required. Otherwise, documents shall be served personally or by mail on the opposing party, noting on the document filed, or on the transmitting letter, that a copy has been so furnished.
( b ) Documents shall be dated and state the title of the proceeding and, except initial petitions, the docket number. Documents submitted using the electronic filing system are considered filed as of the date/time (Eastern Time) reflected in the system. Documents mailed to the Recorder are considered filed on the date mailed as evidenced by a United States Postal Service postmark. Filings by any other means are considered filed upon receipt by the Recorder of a complete copy of the filing during normal business hours.
[81 FR 40194, June 21, 2016]
§ 105-68.300 What must I do before I enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier? When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: ( a ) Checking the *EPLS;* or
( b ) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or
( c ) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.