alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5519

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic located in

Menominee, Michigan, as the ‘‘Fred W. Matz Department of Veterans

Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 19, 2000

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic located in Menominee, Michigan, as the ‘‘Fred W.

Matz Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

4 OUTPATIENT CLINIC, MENOMINEE, MICHI5 GAN.

6 The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic

7 located in Menominee, Michigan, shall after the date of

8 the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the

9 ‘‘Fred W. Matz Department of Veterans Affairs Out-
2

•HR 5519 IH

1 patient Clinic’’. Any reference to such outpatient clinic in

2 any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other

3 paper of the United States shall be considered to be a ref4 erence to the Fred W. Matz Department of Veterans Af5 fairs Outpatient Clinic.

Æ
Exhibit 10.1 


 


October
30, 2019


 


 


Cboe
Global Markets, Inc.


400
South LaSalle Street


Chicago,
IL 60605


Attention:
Chairman and CEO


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


The
undersigned acknowledges and agrees that, unless earlier revoked in writing by the undersigned:


 


		(i)	effective
                                         as of December 31, 2019, the undersigned hereby resigns as an officer of Cboe Global
                                         Markets, Inc. (“Cboe”) pursuant to Section 5.9 of the Bylaws
                                         of Cboe and as an officer, director and/or manager (or in an equivalent position) of
                                         each of the subsidiaries of Cboe for which the undersigned serves as an officer, director
                                         and/or manager (or in an equivalent position), 



 


		(ii)	Cboe
                                         will cause that the undersigned be appointed a Senior Vice President of any of Cboe’s
                                         subsidiaries effective as of January 1, 2020; 



 


		(iii)	the
                                         undersigned will assist with the transition of his duties and responsibilities to his
                                         successor through February 28, 2020; and 



 


		(iv)	the
                                         undersigned’s employment with Cboe and its affiliates will terminate effective
                                         as of February 28, 2020.



 


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	/s/ Mark Hemsley
	 	 
	 	Mark Hemsley




 


Accepted
and Agreed:


 


Cboe
Global Markets, Inc.


 


 


By:
/s/ Edward T. Tilly      


Edward
T. Tilly


President
and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Zachary Lipshultz of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendants Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen, and requests that all 

papers served in this case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Dated: January 25, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Zachary Lipshultz

Zachary Lipshultz

Florida Bar No. 123594

Email: zach@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendants Thomas Brady

 and Gisele Bündchen 

Case 1:22-cv-23983-KMM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### Eugenio Sosa et al., Respondents, v Ideal Elevator Corporation, Appellant, and 1453 Walton Realty Company et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[629 NYS2d 253]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.), entered on or about February 14, 1994, which, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend their pleadings so as to include a claim for punitive damages against defendant-appellant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In an action to recover for personal injuries sustained when the elevator in which plaintiffs were riding fell several floors to the basement of a residential apartment building, allegedly because of a cut cable, the IAS Court properly granted plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint so as to include a claim for punitive damages against defendant-appellant elevator service company, upon the basis of deposition testimony that it was appellant’s practice to have unlicensed mechanics perform unsupervised maintenance and repairs to elevators, that a repair was made to the cables of the elevator in question approximately a month and a half before the accident, and that prior to the accident, appellant submitted inspection certificates to the City of New York that were signed by a licensed mechanic who did not perform or even supervise the inspections by the unlicensed employees. Such could be found by a jury to constitute "gross recklessness or intentional, wanton or malicious conduct aimed at the public generally” *(Gravitt v Newman,*114 AD2d 1000, 1002). Nor does appellant show that the amendment would hinder it in the preparation of its case or prevent it from taking some measure in support of its position (L*oomis v Civetta Corinno Constr. Corp.,*54 NY2d 18, 23). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jay S. Wintrob, Chief Executive Officer of AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b)  [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 13, 2005       /s/ JAY S. WINTROB     Jay S. Wintrob  Chief Executive Officer
#### § 102-74.330 What smoking restrictions apply to outside areas under Executive branch control?

Effective June 19, 2009, smoking is prohibited in courtyards and within twenty-five (25) feet of doorways and air intake ducts on outdoor space under the jurisdiction, custody or control of GSA. This six-month phase-in period is designed to establish a fixed but reasonable time for implementing this policy change. This phase-in period will provide agencies with time to comply with their obligations under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. Ch. 71, Labor-Management Relations, in those circumstances where there is an exclusive union representative for the employees.

[73 FR 77518, Dec. 19, 2008]
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                      |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------- | -
|                                      |  | State or OtherJurisdiction ofIncorporation |  | PercentageOwnership |  
|Parent                                |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.                |  | Maryland                                   |  |                    |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|Subsidiary (1)                        |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|The Patapsco Bank                     |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %
|                                      |  |                                           
|Subsidiaries of The Patapsco Bank (1) |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|PFSL Holding Corp.                    |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %
|                                      |  |                                           
|Prime Business Leasing                |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %
|                                      |  |                                           
|Patapsco Financial Services, Inc.     |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %

---

|(1) | The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements appearing in at Item 7 to this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

COMPONEX CORPORATION , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC., Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2015

- 1178

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in No. 3:13

- cv

- 00384

- wmc, Judge William M. Conley.

______________________

JU DGMENT

______________________

H ARRY E. V AN C AMP , DeWitt Ross & Stevens S.C., Madison, WI, argued for appellant. Also represented by J OSEPH T. L EONE

.

M ICHAEL J OHN VON L OEWENFELDT , Kerr & Wagstaffe, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also repr esented by K EVIN C LUNE , I VO L ABAR

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, D YK and H UGHES , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 16, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                            NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                                   EXHIBIT 11


                                               THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
                                           ---------------------------
                                            August 30,     August 31,
                                               2003           2002
                                           -------------  ------------
<S>                                        <C>            <C>
Net (loss) for computing (loss)
  per common share                         $    (14,285)  $   (29,831)
                                           =============  ============

Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding during each period                815,830       822,837
                                           =============  ============

Net (loss) per common share                $     (0.018)  $    (0.036)
                                           =============  ============
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
ARMEN ENERGY, LLC
                                                               717 E. Guenther
                                                        San Antonio, TX  78210
                                                             210-534-9608 (ph)
                                                            210-534-0836 (fax)


Mr. Francis Richard Biscan Jr.
American Stellar Energy, Inc.
2162 Acorn Court
Wheaton, Il 60187
                                          Re: First Right of Refusal Agreement
                                              Corsicana Field
                                              Navarro County, Texas


Gentlemen:

This letter when executed by all parties shall evidence the terms and
conditions by which American Stellar ("AS") shall participate with Armen
Energy, LLC ("Armen") in any and all business opportunities that Armen Energy,
LLC shall generate.


1) Armen Energy shall give American Stellar Energy, Inc. a first right of
refusal on participation in all business opportunities that are made available
or are generated by Armen Energy.

2) This right shall extend for a period of 30 days from the date of
notification.

3) AS shall sign a non-circumvention agreement, binding for a period of three
years.

4) All available due diligence materials shall be supplied to American Stellar
that are available to Armen Energy. AS shall use this data only for in-house
purposes. AS must have Armen's approval, in writing, for display or discussion
to any parties outside of AS Management.

5) It shall be clear that American Stellar has no obligation to participate in
any opportunities presented to the company.

6) If there is a desire to participate, it shall be evidenced by the formation
and signing of a participation "Option Agreement" regarding the specific
opportunity.

7) Notice: Any notice or correspondence required or permitted to be given
under this agreement may be given personally to an individual party or to an
officer or registered agent or corporate party or may be given by depositing
such notice or correspondence in the. mail, postage prepaid, certified or
registered, return receipt requested, addressed to the parties at the
following addresses.

If the foregoing adequately sets out your understanding of our agreement,
please indicate so by signing in the space provided for below and returning
one copy of this letter so executed to the undersigned.

                                         Sincerely,

                                         /s/ Jerry D. Witte
                                         Jerry D. Witte
                                         President



AMERICAN STELLAR ENERGY INC.
2162 Acorn Court
Wheaton Ill
60187


ARMEN ENERGY, LLC
717 E. Guenther
San Antonio
Texas
78210

Agreed to and Accepted this
20th day of January, 2004.

American Stellar Energy, Inc.Armen Energy, LLC

By:    /s/ Francis R. Biscan Jr.        By:      /s/ Jerry D. Witte
Name:  Francis R. Biscan  Jr.           Name:    Jerry D. Witte
Title: President.                       Title:   President
#### § 102-74.55 Are vending facilities authorized under the Randolph-Sheppard Act operated by permit or contract?

Vending facilities are authorized by permit. As set forth in 34 CFR part 395, the Federal property manager approves and signs State licensing agency permits that authorize States to license blind vendors to operate vending facilities (including vending machines) on Federal property.
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ending November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dinesh R. Desai, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Dinesh
              R.
              DesaiChief
                Executive Officer
              January
                14, 2008
§ 102-75.270 Must antitrust laws be considered when disposing of property? Yes, antitrust laws must be considered in any case in which there is contemplated a disposal to any private interest of— ( a ) Real and related personal property that has an estimated fair market value of $3 million or more; or
( b ) Patents, processes, techniques, or inventions, irrespective of cost.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

This decision is made pursuant to section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

*Docket Number:*                    00-011. Applicant: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1055. Instrument: Electron Beam Evaporator, Model EGN4. Manufacturer: Oxford Applied Research, United Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 65 FR 26583, May 8, 2000.                 

*Comments:*                     None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides: (1) Capability to evaporate four different materials and (2) an interface to a vacuum chamber via a 2                    3/4                     inch CF flange. Two domestic manufacturers of similar equipment advise that (1) These capabilities are pertinent to the applicant's intended purpose and (2) they know of no domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument for the applicant's intended use.                 

We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured in the United States. 

Frank W. Creel, 

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. 00-15524 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-62326-BLOOM/Valle

RUDOLPH BETANCOURT,

Plaintiff,

v.

JALISCO, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice of Settlement in Principle, ECF 

No. [23], filed on March 27, 2023, indicating that the parties have reached a settlement of the 

claims in this case.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The above-styled action is administratively CLOSED without prejudice to the parties 

to file appropriate dismissal documentation, on or before April 27, 2023.

2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes only.

3. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, 

all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and all deadlines are 

TERMINATED.

Case 0:22-cv-62326-BB Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-62326-BLOOM/Valle

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on March 27, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 0:22-cv-62326-BB Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 2.1
 
 
 
 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT




---



##### 



TERMS AND CONDITIONS
   2 of 5




---



##### 



3 of 5




---



##### 



4 of 5




---



##### 



AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Josef MandelbaumVice President  CEO-AG 
Its: Intellectual PropertiesDate: May 7, 2010THOSE CHARACTERS FROM CLEVELAND INC.By:
    
    /s/ Josef MandelbaumIts: Vice PresidentDate: May 7, 2010
 COOKIE JAR ENTERTAINMENT INC.By:
    
    /s/ Greg GilhoolyIts: General CounselDate: May 7, 2010COOKIE JAR ENTERTAINMENT (USA) INC.By:
    
    /s/ Greg GilhoolyIts: General CounselDate: May 7, 2010COOKIE JAR ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS (USA) INC.By:
    
    /s/ Greg GilhoolyIts: General CounselDate: May 7, 2010
   5 of 5