alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                        
                                   FDS - 2ND QUARTER
</LEGEND>                       
<CIK>                              0000006207
<NAME>                             AMREP CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
<CURRENCY>                          U.S. DOLLARS
                                    
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        OCT-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             1
<CASH>                                 12,121
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          73,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                           107,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0
<PP&E>                                 32,100
<DEPRECIATION>                         14,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        232,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                52,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  740
<OTHER-SE>                             86,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          232,045
<SALES>                                49,972
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       82,153
<CGS>                                  33,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          63,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      2,389
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         5,372
<INCOME-TAX>                            2,149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     3,223
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            3,223
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        
 

</TABLE>
#### § 105-68.140 How do I know if a person is excluded?

Check the *Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)* to determine whether a person is excluded. The General Services Administration (GSA) maintains the *EPLS* and makes it available, as detailed in subpart E of this part. When a Federal agency takes an action to exclude a person under the nonprocurement or procurement debarment and suspension system, the agency enters the information about the excluded person into the *EPLS.*
#### § 105-70.025 Fees.

The party requesting a subpoena shall pay the cost of the fees and mileage of any witness subpoenaed in the amounts that would be payable to a witness in a proceeding in United States District Court. A check for witness fees and mileage shall accompany the subpoena when served, except that when a subpoena is issued on behalf of the Authority, a check for witness fees and mileage need not accompany the subpoena.
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



                                           STATE OR OTHER
                                           JURISDICTION OF         PERCENTAGE
PARENT                                     INCORPORATION           OWNERSHIP
------                                     ---------------         ----------

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.                     Maryland                     --


SUBSIDIARY (1)
--------------

The Patapsco Bank                          Maryland                    100%


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE PATAPSCO BANK (1)
-------------------------------------

PFSL Holding Corp.                         Maryland                    100%

Prime Business Leasing                     Maryland                    100%

Patapsco Financial Services, Inc.          Maryland                    100%

----------------
(1)      The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included
         in the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report
         to Stockholders attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
§ 102-33.120 Are there requirements for acquiring life-limited parts? Yes, when you acquire new or used life-limited parts, you must— ( a ) Identify and inspect the parts, ensuring that they have civil or military-certified documentation; and
( b ) Mutilate and dispose of any expired life-limited parts (see § 102-33.370 on handling life-limited parts).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 23, 2015

p0416

Order 

Clerk

April 23, 2015

150029

RONNISCH CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150029

COA: 314195

Oakland CC: 2009-105768-CH

LOFTS ON THE NINE, L.L.C.,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

LOFTS ON THE NINE CONDOMINIUM

ASSOCIATION, HOTLINE ELECTRIC, INC.,

RAM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES OF 

MICHIGAN, INC., EAM ENGINEERS, INC.,

MICHIGAN AIR PRODUCTS CO., STOCK 

BUILDING SUPPLY, L.L.C., WILLIAMS 

DISTRIBUTING CO., NORTH STAR 

PARTNERS, L.L.C., and THE STATE BANK,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

address whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the plaintiff contractor, who 

filed a claim of lien under the Construction Lien Act (CLA), MCL 570.1101 et seq., and 

then filed a circuit court action against the defendant property owner, alleging breach of 

contract, foreclosure of lien, and unjust enrichment claims, was entitled to an award of 

attorney fees as a “prevailing party” under MCL 570.1118(2), when the plaintiff 

prevailed in binding arbitration on its contract claim, but neither the arbitrator nor the 

circuit court resolved the plaintiff’s foreclosure of lien claim. See HA Smith Lumber & 

Hardware Co v Decina, 480 Mich 987 (2007).
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Gilbert Hu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theAnnual Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K forthe period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presentsin all material respects the financial condition and results of operations ofAltiGen Communications, Inc.
| Date: December 29, 2006 | By:    | /s/ GILBERT HU          |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         | Name:  | Gilbert Hu              |
|                         | Title: | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Albert’s Executrix *vs*Blue.

Error to the Union Circuit.

*Pleading. Action on the case.*

*December*22.

The case stated,

A declaration in assumpsit is not demurable commencing “A B complains of C D in a plea of trespass on the case” without adding the words "on promises,” though the latter is the modem practice. Trespass on the case in its general and mosteopnprehensive sense includes assumpsit as well as actions in form *ex delicto. (l Chit. 161.)*

Judge Graham

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The only subject of inquiry in this case is, the suffiU ciency of the plaintiff’s declaration. The several counts are in assumpsit, and but one exception to the form or substance of either of them has been taken. It is insisted that the declaration is in *tort*upon a cause of action *ex contractu.*It commences by stating that the plaintiff complains of the defendant, "in custody &c. of a plea of trespass on the case, for that heretofore, &c.” The modern form of declaring in assumpsit is, to begin the declaration by the words, “action of trespass on the case *on promises,”*or words of like import. The precedents in *Chitty, Archbold,*&c., prescribe that form. Anciently, however, it was not so. Trespass on the case, in its most comprehensive signification, includes *assumpsit*as well as an action in form, *ex delicto,*(1 *Chit.,*151;) and declarations formerly commenced with the words, “ trespass on the case,” omitting the words, *on promises.*It is true, in the cases referred to by the defendant’s counsel, where a statute authorizes “an action on the case,” it shall be understood to mean an action in *tort,*and not in contract, and.we admit that where actions by parné are *spoken*of, an action “on the case” should be construed to mean an action in *tort.*But we think it would be extending the rule too far to enforce it rigidly, to the mere form of the commencement of a declaration, and, while we do not deny that it is not only more in conformity with general usage,. *93but the better form of pleading, to insert the words, “on promises,” we cannot concur in the suggestion, that the omission of these words constitute an objection sufficiently valid to sustain a demurrer. It is, at best, but a rigidly technical objection, not at all affeeting the merits of the case, nor, in any manner, calculated to mislead the defendant as to the subject matter of the plaintiff’s action. The objection taken, is not in a matter of substance; it is only one of mere form, and, under our statute regulating pleadings, should not have been regarded.

*B. Sf A. Monroe*for *plaintiff; J*«j* *W. L. Harlan*for defendant.

It seems to us, that the Court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the declaration.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is, therefore, reversed and cause remanded, with directions to set aside the judgment for the defendant, overrule the demurrer, &c., and for other proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
#### § 105-1.000-50 Scope of part.

This part describes the method by which the General Services Administration (GSA) implements and supplements the Federal Property Management Regulations (FPMR) and implements certain regulations prescribed by other agencies. It contains procedures that implement and supplement part 101-1 of the FPMR.
24 September 2015

107P15

#### Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Hui S. Smith, et al.

Pit’s PDR under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14r554)

Denied
542P05-2

#### State v. Larry Eugene Allred

Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA (COAP15-673)

Dismissed
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Comments submitted to agency directly are being posted by agency in docket.
#### § 102-85.210 What if a customer agency has to relocate?

If the agency or GSA determines relocation is necessary at the expiration of an OA for either Federally owned or leased space, the customer agency is responsible for all costs associated with relocation at that time.
JEFFERY L. GIBBS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3151

Opinion filed August 5, 2014.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Jeffery L. Gibbs, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the 

merits.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
Suggested citation and version History for:


  Haeussler, Peter J., Yount, Jim, and Wells, Ray, 1999, 
      Preliminary geologic map of the Uncas 7.5' quadrangle, 
      Callam and Jefferson Counties, Washington:  
      U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-421, 
      scale 1:24,000 [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1999/of99-421/].


 Version 1.0 

  October 18, 2007
     Migrated to http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1999/of99-421/

  October 22, 1999
     Added metadata files, Arc-export files, and PostScript 
     files.  No change was made to the map so this is not a 
     version change.

  September 29, 1999
     First release, on the Web only, at 
     http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/open-file/of99-421
§ 6.04-1 Enforcement. ( a ) The rules and regulations in this part shall be enforced by the Captain of the Port under the supervision and general direction of the District Commander, Area Commander, and the Commandant. All authority and power vested in the Captain of the Port by the regulations in this part shall be deemed vested in and may be exercised by the District Commander, Area Commander, and the Commandant.
( b ) The rules and regulations in this part may be enforced by any other officer or petty officer of the Coast Guard designated by the District Commander, Area Commander, or the Commandant.
( c ) Any authority or power under this part vested in, delegated to, or exercised by a member of the Coast Guard shall be subject to the direction of the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating.
( d ) Actions taken and decisions made under this part can be appealed through the procedures outlined in 33 CFR 160.7.
[E.O. 13273, 67 FR 56215, Sept. 3, 2002, as amended by USCG-2021-0348, 87 FR 3222, Jan. 21, 2022]
#### § 102-41.25 Who retains custody and is responsible for the reporting, care, and handling of property covered by this part?

You, the holding agency, normally retain physical custody of the property and are responsible for its care and handling pending final disposition. With the exception of property listed in § 102-41.35, you must report promptly to the GSA forfeited, voluntarily abandoned, or unclaimed personal property not being retained for official use and seized property on which proceedings for forfeiture by court decree are being started or have begun. In general, the procedures for reporting such property parallel those for reporting excess personal property under part 102-36 of this subchapter B.
§ 105-1.104 Publication of GSPMR. ( a ) Most GSPMR are published in the Federal Register. This practice helps to ensure that interested business concerns, other agencies, and the public are apprised of GSA policies and procedures pertaining to property and records management and certain related activities.
( b ) Most GSPMR are published in cumulative form in chapter 105 of title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The Federal Register and title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.
Exhibit 4.2


 


 


description of common
stock of


northern technologies
international corporation


 


The following summary description of the general terms and provisions of the common stock
of Northern Technologies International Corporation is a summary only and, therefore, is not complete and is subject to, and qualified
in its entirety by reference to, the terms and provisions of NTIC’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, NTIC’s
Amended and Restated Bylaws, and the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law. NTIC’s Restated Certificate
of Incorporation, as amended, and NTIC’s Amended and Restated Bylaws have previously been filed as exhibits with the SEC.


 


Common Stock


 


Authorized.  We currently have authority to issue up to 15,000,000 shares
of common stock, $0.02 par value per share. As of November 11, 2019, we had 9,090,413 shares of common stock outstanding. 
We may amend from time to time our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to increase the number of authorized shares
of common stock.  Any such amendment would require the approval of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares
entitled to vote thereon.


 


Voting. For all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, each holder of common
stock is entitled to one vote for each share registered in the holder’s name on our books. Our common stock does not have
cumulative voting rights. As a result, holders of a majority of our outstanding common stock can elect all of the directors who
are up for election in a particular year.


 


Dividends. If our board of directors declares a dividend, holders of common stock
will receive payments from our funds that are legally available to pay dividends. However, this dividend right is subject to any
preferential dividend rights we may grant to the persons who hold preferred stock, if any is outstanding.


 


Liquidation and Dissolution. If we are liquidated or dissolve, the holders of
our common stock will be entitled to share ratably in all the assets that remain after we pay our liabilities and any amounts we
may owe to the persons who hold preferred stock, if any is outstanding.


 


Fully Paid and Nonassessable.  All shares of our outstanding common
stock are fully paid and nonassessable.


 


Other Rights and Restrictions. Holders of our common stock do not have preemptive
or subscription rights, and they have no right to convert their common stock into any other securities. Our common stock is not
subject to redemption by us. The rights, preferences, and privileges of common stockholders are subject to the rights of the stockholders
of any series of preferred stock which we may designate in the future. Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and
Amended and Restated Bylaws do not restrict the ability of a holder of common stock to transfer his or her shares of common stock.


 


Listing. Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol
“NTIC.”


 


Transfer Agent and Registrar. The transfer agent and registrar for our common
stock is Broadridge Financial Services.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case No. 1:22-cv-24023-SCOLA/GOODMAN

KENNETH C. GRIFFIN,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

NOTICE OF HEARING (VIA ZOOM)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing on discovery matters will be held before 

Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on May 3, 2024 at 3:30 PM EST via Zoom. The discovery 

matters to be heard include:

• Whether Plaintiff is required to respond to Interrogatory Nos. 5 through 13 by identifying 

the facts, documents, and persons with knowledge that support contentions in Plaintiff’s 

second amended complaint? 

Copies of the relevant source documents will be emailed to Chambers consistent with the 

procedures set forth in Magistrate Judge Goodman’s Discovery Procedures Order. See ECF No. 

16 at 4.

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1(a)(3)

 Undersigned counsel conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel by phone on April 1, 2024, and 

April 8, 2024, in a good-faith effort to resolve by agreement the issue raised herein but were 

unable to reach any resolution of the issue. 

Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2024 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated: April 15, 2024 Respectfully Submitted

DAVID A. HUBBERT

Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

Mary Elizabeth Smith

MARY ELIZABETH SMITH

Maryland Bar No. 0712110235 

STEPHANIE A. SASARAK

Maryland Bar No. 1012160096 

BEATRIZ T. SAIZ 

New Jersey Bar No. 024761995 

Trial Attorneys, Tax Division 

U.S. Department of Justice 

P.O. Box 14198 

Washington, D.C. 20044 

202-307-2089 (v) | 202-514-4963 (f) 

Mary.E.Smith@usdoj.gov 

Stephanie.A.Sasarak@usdoj.gov 

Beatriz.T.Saiz@usdoj.gov 

Counsel for the United States 

Of counsel: 

MARKENZY LAPOINTE

United States Attorney

Southern District of Florida 

Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2024 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 15, 2024, I filed a copy of the foregoing document with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to counsel of record. 

Mary Elizabeth Smith

MARY ELIZABETH SMITH

Trial Attorney

 U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Division 

Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2024 Page 3 of 3
§ 102-80.10 What are the basic safety and environmental management policies for real property? The basic safety and environmental management policies for real property are that Federal agencies must— ( a ) Provide for a safe and healthful work environment for Federal employees and the visiting public;
( b ) Protect Federal real and personal property;
( c ) Promote mission continuity;
( d ) Provide reasonable safeguards for emergency forces if an incident occurs;
( e ) Assess risk;
( f ) Make decision makers aware of risks; and
( g ) Act promptly and appropriately in response to risk.
#### § 105-68.210 Which nonprocurement transactions are covered transactions?

All nonprocurement transactions, as defined in § 105-68.970, are covered transactions unless listed in § 105-68.215. (See appendix to this part.)
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of the undersigned registrant (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: December 21, 2009  American International Ventures, Inc.  /s/ Myron Goldstein Myron Goldstein Chief Financial Officer  /s/ Steven Davis Steven Davis Chief Executive Officer