alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

West Palm Beach Division

BRITTANY ROBERSON, REBECCA 

FREEMAN, BIANCA VIÑAS, and 

TIFFANY KING, individually and on behalf 

of others similarly situated,

 Plaintiffs, 

v.

HEALTH CAREER INSTITUTE LLC (dba 

HCI COLLEGE LLC and HCI 

ACQUISITION LLC), and FLORIAN 

EDUCATION INVESTORS LLC,

 Defendants.

Civil Action No. 9:22-cv-81883-RAR

District Judge: Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II

Magistrate Judge: Ryon M. McCabe

NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs Brittany Roberson, Rebecca Freeman, Bianca Viñas, and Tiffany King hereby 

notify the Court that they intend to file an amended complaint on or before February 21, 2023. On 

January 31, 2023, Defendant Health Career Institute LLC filed a partial motion to dismiss pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 27) and Defendant Florian Education 

Investors filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) (ECF No. 

26). Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c)(2), Plaintiffs’ deadline to oppose the motions would be February

14, 2023. Rather than opposing the motions, Plaintiffs have chosen to file an amended complaint.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), the deadline for amending as a 

matter of course is February 21, 2023; pursuant to the Scheduling Order entered in this case on 

February 6, 2023 (ECF No. 35), the deadline for amending is March 17, 2023. 

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiffs submit this notice only to avoid any confusion about the timeliness of their 

pleadings.

Dated: 2/14/2023

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Nicole Mayer

NICOLE MAYER 

Florida Bar No. 012035

Nicole@MayerLawFlorida.com

171 Dommerich Drive.

Maitland, Florida 32751

(352) 494-3657

REBECCA EISENBREY

(pro hac vice)

reisenbrey@ppsl.org

ERIC SCHMIDT

(pro hac vice)

eschmidt@ppsl.org

Project on Predatory Student Lending

769 Centre Street, Suite 166

Jamaica Plain, MA 02130

(617) 390-2669

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this 14

th day of February 2023, the foregoing PLAINTIFFS’

NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT was served on counsel of 

record through the CM/ECF system, which will notify all counsel of record. 

/s/ Nicole Mayer

NICOLE MAYER 

Florida Bar No. 012035

Nicole@MayerLawFlorida.com

171 Dommerich Drive.

Maitland, Florida 32751

(352) 494-3657

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38824-38825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15735]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]


Regulations Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public 
Notice

June 16, 2000.
    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(h), of 
the receipt of exempt and prohibited off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission 
decisional employees, who make or receive an exempt or a prohibited 
off-the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested on-
the-record proceeding, to deliver a copy of the communication, if 
written, or a summary of the substance of any oral communication, to 
the Secretary.
    Prohibited communications will be included in a public, non-
decisional file associated with, but not part of, the decisional record 
of the proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited 
communication and any responses thereto should become part of the 
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not 
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a 
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or 
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may 
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and 
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant 
such requests only when it determines that fairness so requires.
    Exempt off-the-record communications will be included in the 
decisional record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with 
a cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR 
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of exempt and prohibited off-the-record 
communications received in the Office of the Secretary within the 
preceding 14 days. The documents may be viewed in the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

Exempt

    1. CP00-65-000; 5/26/00; Clifford G. Day.

[[Page 38825]]

    2. P-8282; 6/08/00; Rafael Montag.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15735 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 46 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2001 P
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 46 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2001 P
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-80171-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RICARDO ANTONIO CHAG-GONZALES,

Defendant.

/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation entered by 

Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart Following Change of Plea Hearing [ECF No. 18]. On 

December 13, 2022, Magistrate Judge Reinhart held a Change of Plea hearing [ECF No. 16] during 

which Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment [ECF No. 10]. Magistrate Judge 

Reinhart thereafter issued a Report recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea 

to Count One of the Indictment, that the Court find Defendant to have freely and voluntarily 

entered his guilty plea, and that the Court adjudicate him guilty of Count One of the Indictment 

[ECF No. 10]. No party has filed objections to the Report [ECF No. 19], and the time to do so has 

expired.

The Court has conducted a review of the record and finds no error in the Report. Therefore, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 18] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. The guilty plea entered by Defendant Ricardo Antonio Chag-Gonzales as to Count One 

of the Indictment is ACCEPTED. 

Case 9:22-cr-80171-AMC Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/03/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-80171-CR-CANNON

3. Defendant Ricardo Antonio Chag-Gonzales is adjudicated guilty of Count One of the 

Indictment, which charges him with illegal reentry after removal, in violation of 

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 3rd day of January 2023.

________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cr-80171-AMC Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/03/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 102-37.270 May a SASP retain surplus property for its own use?

Yes, you can retain surplus property for use in operating the donation program, but only if you have a cooperative agreement with GSA that allows you to do so. You must obtain prior GSA approval before using any surplus property in the operation of the SASP. Make your needs known by submitting a listing of needed property to the appropriate GSA regional office for approval. GSA will review the list to ensure that it is of the type and quantity of property that is reasonably needed and useful in performing SASP operations. GSA will notify you within 30 calendar days whether you may retain the property for use in your operations. Title to any surplus property GSA approves for your retention will vest in your SASP. You must maintain separate records for such property.
Exhibit A 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 99-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 1 of 3
P.I. SERVICES

Priority: STANDARD Field Sheet #2023000251

Received: 2/21/2023 at 3:32 pm 

Court Date: Filed: 12/16/2022 

SERVE: 

NAOMI OSAKA, 9621 ARBY DRIVE, BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 

Attempts 

Date Time 

1. I

2. I

3. I

4. I

5. I

6. I

7. I

8. I

Actual Service Info 

Type: 

Served on: 

Address: 

Comments: 

Server: COURT DETECTIVE WORLD WIDE, INC. 

Comments 

Married? 

Military? 

As: 

1111111 ii llllll lllll l�llll l�llll 11111111111111 

Miles 

Hours 

Additional Addr: 1 2 3

Courier 

Out of Pocket C osts 

Age_ Sex M F Race ____ Height ___ Weight. ___ Hair ____ Glasses Y N 

Case Number: 22-CV-23753-KMM Southern 

Plaintiff 

EDWIN GARRISON, ET AL., ON BEHALF 

District 

Defendant 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, ET AL. 

Copyright© 1992-2023 DreamBuIlt Software, Inc. - Process Server's Toolbox V8.2n 

2/23.2023 6:30 pm No answer, all dark. The gate was closed.

No answer, all dark. The gate was closed.

No answer, all dark. The gate was closed.

No answer, all dark. The gate was closed.

No answer, all dark. The gate was closed.

No answer, all dark. The gate was closed.

No answer, all dark. The gate was closed.

2 24 9:45 pm

2 25 7:05 am

2 26 2:42 pm

2 27 8:11 pm

2 28 7:05 am

3 01 5:55 pm

3 02 9:38 am Bad Address. Mr. Milan purchased the house in July 2022.

Black Tesla (no plates) in the

driveway.

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 99-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 2 of 3
On 3.02.2023 @ 9:38 am, per Mr. Milan (the new homeowner) the Defendant sold this 

house in July of 2022. 

6007

Homayon Taghavi

xx

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 99-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 3 of 3
No. 07-19-00268-CR

Josue Julio Garica-Morales

 Appellant

From the 47th District Court 

 of Potter County 

v. June 21, 2021

The State of Texas

 Appellee 

§

§

§

§

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated June 21, 2021, it is ordered, adjudged, 

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that 

have already been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
#### § 102-38.355 Do the regulations of this part apply to State Agencies for Surplus Property (SASPs) when conducting sales?

Yes, State Agencies for Surplus Property (SASPs) must follow the regulations in this part when conducting sales on behalf of the General Services Administration of Government personal property in their custody.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0486 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. RANDY JOE FISH,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 2 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 24 2024

06/24/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0486
#### § 102-75.700 Which Federal agencies may solicit applications from eligible State agencies interested in acquiring the property to provide replacement housing for persons being displaced by Federal or Federally assisted projects?

After receiving the surplus notice, any Federal agency needing property for replacement housing for displaced persons may solicit applications from eligible State agencies.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida

Katherine Hodgin

9:22-cv-81733-DMM

Intensive Care Consortium Inc.

JFK Medical Center Limited Partnership

HCA Inc.

Physician Services Group of Florida, LLC

HCA Physician Services, Inc.

Via Registered Agent

CT Corporation System

300 Montvue RD

Knoxville, TN 37919-5546

Alison D. Rogers, Esq.

Rogers Law Practice PLLC

7154 N. University Dr. Suite 188

Tamarac, Florida 33321

Case 9:22-cv-81733-DMM Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2022 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

9:22-cv-81733-DMM

0.00

Case 9:22-cv-81733-DMM Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2022 Page 2 of 2
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 632

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study

on mortality and adverse outcome rates of Medicare patients of providers

of anesthesia services, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1999

Mr. WELDON of Florida (for himself, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. STEARNS, Mr.

BENTSEN, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr.

BRADY of Texas, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. ROTHMAN,

Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. PALLONE, and Mr. TALENT) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in

addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services

to conduct a study on mortality and adverse outcome

rates of Medicare patients of providers of anesthesia

services, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Seniors Assurance

5 Study Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 632 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANESTHESIA OUTCOME STUDY.

2 (a) STUDY.—(1) The Secretary of Health and

3 Human Services shall conduct a study of mortality and

4 adverse outcome rates of medicare patients by providers

5 of anesthesia services. In conducting the study, the Sec6 retary shall analyze the impact of physician supervision

7 of providers of anesthesia services, or lack thereof, on such

8 mortality and adverse outcome rates.

9 (2) In conducting the study, the Secretary shall con10 sult with appropriate national professional organizations

11 with respect to the methodology of the study, and shall

12 use medicare operating room anesthesia data, adjusted for

13 patient acuity and other relevant scientific variables.

14 (b) REPORT.—Not later than June 30, 2000, the

15 Secretary shall submit to Congress a report containing the

16 results of the study conducted under subsection (a).

17 (c) CONSIDERATION OF REPORT IN RULEMAKING.—

18 If the Secretary determines that the lack of physician su19 pervision of providers of anesthesia services results in an

20 adverse impact on outcome rates of medicare patients,

21 then providers of anesthesia services furnished under the

22 medicare or medicaid program shall be supervised by a

23 physician in the same manner as such providers are super24 vised under regulations of the Department of Health and

25 Human Services in effect on January 1, 1999.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Nunez, Appellant.

[628 NYS2d 559]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County *495(Egitto, J.), rendered May 24, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, manslaughter in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court did not err in denying suppression of an eyewitness’s identification of the defendant at the police precinct, as it was not the product of police suggestiveness. Rather, this eyewitness’s viewing of the defendant was accidental, and was not the product of questionable police procedures *(see, People v Edwards,*160 AD2d 722; *People v Hampton,*129 AD2d 736; *People v Magsamen,*128 AD2d 646; *cf., People v Santiago,*163 AD2d 539; *People v Smalls,*112 AD2d 173).

The defendant’s argument that there was legally insufficient evidence of his identity as the perpetrator is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Bynum,*70 NY2d 858; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafalo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions in his supplemental *pro se*brief are either without merit or involve matters outside the record which cannot be considered on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction *(see, People v Colon,*138 AD2d 392). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-308-001]

Take notice that, on June 5, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet to be effective July 1, 1000:

Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 45E.1

ANR states that this filing is made to correct a clerical error incorrectly identifying the location of the Napoleon Interconnect, Henry County, Ohio as the Southeast Central Segment instead of the Northern Segment on the tariff sheet previously submitted on May  31, 2000 in Docket No. RP00-308-000.

ANR states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all affected customers and state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-15098 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Opinion issued September 26, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO S . 01 - 1 3 - 00 418 - C R & 01 - 13 - 00419 - CR

——————————— IN RE GLEN TATE , Relator
Original Proceeding s on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Glen Tate filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to compel the trial court to rule on his “Motion for the Production of the Court2

Reporter’s Records” from the first trial of his offenses, conducted in the 179th District Court, which ended in a mistrial. 1 Before we may grant such relief, a relator must establish that the trial court had a legal duty to rule on the motion, the court received and was asked to rule on the motion, and the court failed to do so. In re Keeter , 134 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2003, orig. proceeding). Tate has not established these elements. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley , and Massengale
. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2( b).

1 The underlying proceeding s are State of Texas v. Tate , No s . 1309786 & 1309787 ( 209th District Court , Harris County, Tex as ) , the Honorable Michael McSpadden presiding
.