alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
No. 333-21189 and No. 333-07053 of Helisys, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 of
our report dated November 21, 1997 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph indicating that there are matters that raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern),
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Helisys, Inc. for the year ended
July 31, 1997.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE

Los Angeles, California
December 4, 1997
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT PIERCE DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-14378-CIV-CANNON/McCabe

NATIONAL BUILDERS INSURANCE 

COMPANY and AMERICAN BUILDERS 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SBP HOMES, LLC., DENIS MANELSKI,

and JENNIFER MANELSKI,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF No. 29]

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss/Joint Motion to Abstain (the “Report”) 

[ECF No. 29], filed on June 9, 2023. On March 20, 2023, Defendants filed a Joint Motion to 

Dismiss/Joint Motion to Abstain (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 18]. On June 9, 2023, following 

referral, Judge McCabe issued a Report recommending that the Motion be granted, and the case

be dismissed without prejudice [ECF No. 29 pp. 1, 7–8]. Objections to the Report were due on 

June 23, 2023 [ECF No. 29 p. 8]. No party filed objections, and the time to do so has expired 

[ECF No. 29 p. 8].

To challenge the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge, a party must file 

specific written objections identifying the portions of the proposed findings and recommendation 

to which objection is made. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Heath v. Jones, 863 F.2d 815, 822 

(11th Cir. 1989); Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). A district court 

Case 2:22-cv-14378-AMC Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/26/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-14378-CIV-CANNON/McCabe

2

reviews de novo those portions of the report to which objection is made and may accept, reject, 

or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To the extent a party fails to object to parts of the magistrate judge’s report, 

the Court may accept the recommendation so long as there is no clear error of law or fact on the 

face of the record. Macort, 208 F. App’x at 784; see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

Following review, the Court finds the Report to be well reasoned and correct and finds no 

clear of law or fact. For the reasons set forth in the Report [ECF No. 29 pp. 6–7], it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 29] is ACCEPTED.

2. The Motion [ECF No. 18] is GRANTED.

3. Plaintiffs’ Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

4. The Clerk is instructed to CLOSE this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 26th day of June 2023.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 2:22-cv-14378-AMC Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/26/2023 Page 2 of 2
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2001 P
Exhibit 31.2

               CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-QSB

     I, Joanna Hoover, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ITIS Holdings
Inc., a Nevada Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's disclosure internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 24, 2004
------------------

/s/ Joanna Hoover
 ----------------
Name: Joanna Hoover
Title: Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
Order filed, June 6, 2018 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

____________ NO. 01 - 18 - 00300 - CR , 01 - 18 - 00301 - CR, 01 - 18 - 00302 - CR and 01 - 18 - 00303 - CR

TROY LEVI BURWELL , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case 1557904 , 1557905 , 1557906 and 1557907



### ORDER The reporter’s record in this case was due 06/04/2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order. We order, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal , if any, within 30 days of the date of this or der

.

PER CURIAM
§ 102-40.195 How do we handle Munitions List Items (MLIs)? ( a ) Munitions List Items (MLIs) are listed in 22 CFR part 121. A system of demilitarization codes identifies the extent of alteration or destruction necessary when transferring or selling MLIs. The appropriate code is normally assigned to items when they enter the supply system of the Department of Defense (DOD) or a civilian agency. Refer to DOD 4160.21-M-1 (Change No. 1) for a complete description of the DOD program and the requirements to be followed for property owned, procured by or under the control of DOD. The DOD manual is available from the Defense Logistics Agency, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060. If your agency uses another system of identifying items requiring demilitarization, you must provide a detailed description of that system to the General Services Administration, Mail Code MA, 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405, Attn: Director, Personal Property Policy.
( b ) When disposing of MLIs, you must perpetuate these demilitarization codes; alert those to whom you are transferring or selling property that the item may require demilitarization; and perform any required demilitarization, or provide any documentation or certifications in accordance with the DOD demilitarization manual, DOD 4160.21-M-1 (Change No. 1), or other agency policy manual if the MLIs are not governed by the DOD demilitarization manual.
( c ) Disposal of MLIs will follow the provisions of parts 102-36, 102-37, and 102-38 of this subchapter unless different disposal procedures are required by law or your agency regulation issued in support of 22 U.S.C. 2778.
§ 101-26.803-3 Reporting of discrepancies in transportation, shipments, material, or billings. ( a ) Transportation-type discrepancies shall be processed under the instructions in subpart 101-40.7 when the discrepancies are the fault of the carrier and occur while the shipments are in the possession of: ( 1 ) International ocean or air carriers, regardless of who pays the transportation charges, except when shipment is on a through Government bill of lading (TGBL), or is made through the Defense Transportation System (DTS). Discrepancies in shipments on a TGBL or which occur while in the DTS shall be reported as prescribed in the GSA publication referenced in § 101-26.803-1; or
( 2 ) Carriers within the continental United States, when other than GSA or DOD pays the transportation charges.
( b ) All other shipping, transportation, or billing discrepancies shall be reported on the forms, and within the time frames, dollar limitations, and according to the procedures prescribed in the GSA publication referenced in § 101-26.803-1.
[53 FR 26596, July 14, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 24086, June 14, 1990]
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.2 


TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
2019 EQUITY PLAN 
AWARD AGREEMENT 
  
  
###GRANT_DATE###
 
 
###PARTICIPANT_NAME###
###HOME_ADDRESS###
 
 
Dear ###PARTICIPANT_NAME###,
 
1) Tompkins Financial Corporation (the “Company”) hereby grants to ###PARTICIPANT_NAME### the award(s) summarized below (the “Grant”), pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2019 Equity Plan, as it may be amended from time to time (the “Plan”).  The terms, conditions and restrictions of your award are set forth in this Award Agreement, which is governed by the terms of the Plan.  Awards shall be exercised in the manner set forth in the Plan.  Without limiting the foregoing, you may elect to have stock withheld to pay any purchase price or cost associated with the exercise.  For the award to be effective, you must sign below and return this Award Agreement to the Company, acknowledging that you have received and read the Prospectus dated May 13, 2019 and any applicable prospectus supplements (together, the “Prospectus”), and agree to the terms of this Award Agreement and the Plan.
 
2) Award Summary:
 
	
		
	Restricted Stock Award Summary 

	Award Date:
	###GRANT_DATE###

	Number of Restricted Stock Shares:
	###TOTAL_AWARDS###

	Vesting Schedule:
	5 Year

	Percentage 
	Date 

	0%
	 

	25%
	 

	25%
	 

	25%
	 

	25%
	 




 
By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Grant on the date shown above on the terms stated herein, which has been issued to me under the terms and conditions of the Plan.  I further acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and the Prospectus and agree to be bound by all of the terms and conditions of the Plan as if they were set out in full in this Award Agreement.  I agree to accept as binding, conclusive and final all decisions or interpretations of the Committee or the Board, as the case may be, upon any questions relating to the Plan or this Grant.
 
I understand that in the event the Committee determines, in its sole discretion, that I engaged in any activity contrary or harmful to the interests of the Company or its customers, including without limitation, any violation of Company policy or procedures, any unvested awards I hold shall immediately be forfeited and any rights thereunder shall terminate.
 
 
 
 
Signature:         __________________________       Date: _###ACCEPTANCE_DATE### 
###PARTICIPANT_NAME###
 
 
 
Signature:         __________________________       Date: _###GRANT DATE###               
Christopher Chinici                                         
Vice President, Actuary
Tompkins Financial Corporation         
 




1
§ 105-56.031 Notice. ( a ) The disbursing official will provide GSA an electronic list of the names, mailing addresses, and taxpayer identifying numbers of the debtors from whom amounts of past-due, legally enforceable debt are due other Federal agencies. The disbursing official will identify the creditor agency name and a point of contact that will handle concerns regarding the debt.
( b ) Before offsetting a salary payment, the GSA National Payroll Center, acting as the paying agency on behalf of the disbursing official, will notify the debtor in writing of the date deductions from salary will commence and of the amount of such deductions.
( c ) ( 1 ) When an offset occurs under this subpart, the disbursing official, or the GSA National Payroll Center on behalf of the disbursing official, will notify the debtor in writing that an offset has occurred including— ( i ) A description of the payment and the amount of offset taken;
( ii ) The identity of the creditor agency identified by the disbursing official requesting the offset; and
( iii ) A contact point at the creditor agency identified by the disbursing official that will handle concerns regarding the offset.
( 2 ) The information described in paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and (c)(1)(iii) of this section does not need to be provided to the debtor when the offset occurs if such information was included in a prior notice from the disbursing official or the creditor agency.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Haim Shani, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of NICE-Systems Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 20-F fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of NICE-Systems Ltd.


June 26, 2003


                                      By:      /s/
                                      Name: Haim Shani
                                      Title: President & Chief Executive Officer
§ 102-74.205 What Federal facility ridesharing policy must Executive agencies follow? ( a ) In accordance with Executive Order 12191, “Federal Facility Ridesharing Program” (3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 138), Executive agencies must actively promote the use of ridesharing (carpools, vanpools, privately leased buses, public transportation, and other multi-occupancy modes of travel) by personnel working at Federal facilities to conserve energy, reduce congestion, improve air quality, and provide an economical way for Federal employees to commute to work.
( b ) In accordance with the Federal Employees Clean Air Incentives Act (Public Law 103-172), the Federal Government is required to take steps to improve the air quality, and to reduce traffic congestion by providing for the establishment of programs that encourage Federal employees to commute to work by means other than single-occupancy motor vehicles.
( c ) In accordance with the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (Public Law 105-178), employers, including the Federal Government, are to offer employees transportation fringe benefits.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
                            METRIS RECEIVABLES, INC.
                               METRIS MASTER TRUST

         The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Direct Merchants Credit
Card Bank, National Association, as Servicer pursuant to the Second Amended and
Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated January 22, 2002 (as amended, the
"Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), by and among Metris Receivables, Inc., as
transferor (the "Transferor"), Direct Merchants Credit Card Bank, National
Association, as servicer (the "Servicer"), and U.S. Bank National Association, a
national banking association, as trustee (the "Trustee"), does hereby certify
that:

         1.       Direct Merchants Credit Card Bank, National Association, is
Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         2.       The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

         3.       This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.5 of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         4.       A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period
from January 1, 2003 until December 31, 2003 was conducted under my supervision.

         5.       Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my
knowledge, fully performed all of its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement throughout such period, and no default in the performance of
such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph
6 below.

         6.       The following is a description of each default in the
performance of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement, including any Supplement, known to me to have been made
during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such
default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such
default and (iii) the current status of each such default:

                  None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
on March 30, 2004.

                                      DIRECT MERCHANTS CREDIT CARD BANK,
                                      NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer

                                      /s/ Scott R. Fjellman
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Name: Scott R. Fjellman
                                      Title: Senior Vice President, Treasurer &
                                             Cashier
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

September 3, 2015

No. 10-15-00020-CR

CLARENCE JOHNSON

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

From the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. FO-13-21575

**JUDGMENT**

	This proceeding has been considered by the Court.  It is the judgment of this Court that the trial court’s judgment signed on January 12, 2015 is affirmed.  

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

							PER CURIAM

****SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK			

						By: ___________________________

							Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 130408 & (70) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 130408 COA: 257103 Wayne CC: 03-012254 D’JUAN GARRETT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be revie wed by this Court. The miscellaneous motion is GRANTED.

p0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
#### § 102-33.145 Why must we establish Flight Program Standards?

You must establish Flight Program Standards because Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) may not cover or address all aspects of your agency's flight program, such as non-certificated aircraft, high-risk operations, special personnel requirements, etc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

for himself and all others similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC, et al.,

 Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER ON COLLECTIVE ACTION NOTICES

THIS CAUSE is before the the Court upon the parties’ Joint Notice of Filing, ECF No. 

[163], filed on July 17, 2023. Therein, the parties provide competing proposed versions of a 

Collective Action Court Notice, a Collective Action Reminder Notice, and a Consent to Join form. 

The Court has reviewed the parties’ proposed versions and authorized the versions attached to this 

Order. 

Consistent with the Court’s Order on Motion for Conditional Certification, the opt-in 

period will run for sixty (60) days, beginning on Monday, July 24, 2023. No Notices shall be sent 

prior to that date. Plaintiff may send the Reminder Notice on August 23, 2023. The opt-in period 

will close on September 22, 2023.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on July 20, 2023.

 _________________________________

 BETH BLOOM

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

2

Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 2 of 2