alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 105-69.205 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 105-69.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or an extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, “professional and technical services” shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting of a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( c ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( d ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





KSW,
Inc.


Long
Island City, New York




We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-21735, No. 333-50293 and No.
333-131692)of our report dated March 19, 2010, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of KSW, Inc. appearing in this Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/BDO Seidman,
LLP


New York,
New York




March 19,
2010
Blueprint






Exhibit 10.1









CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT


CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (this
"Amendment"), effective as of January 1, 2017, by and
among Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), Strategic Consultants International, LLC, a
Puerto Rico registered Limited Liability Corporation (the
“Consultant”), and Elizabeth Plaza, residing in Dorado,
Puerto Rico (“Plaza”).


W I T N
E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, the Company, Consultant and
Plaza have entered into that certain Consulting Agreement,
effective as of January 1, 2014, as such Consulting Agreement has
been and may be amended, restated or otherwise modified from time
to time (the "Consulting Agreement"). Capitalized terms used but
not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in
the Consulting Agreement; and


WHEREAS, the Company, Consultant and
Plaza desire to modify the Consulting Agreement.


NOW THEREFORE, for good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:




1.

The following shall
be added to the end of Section 2 of the Consulting
Agreement:






 


This
agreement shall be extended through December 31, 2017. For purposes
of this Agreement, “Extension Term” shall mean the
period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.


 




2.

The following
sentence shall be deleted at the end of Section 5 of the Consulting
Agreement:






 


For the
full and proper performance of this Agreement, the Company agrees
to compensate Consultant a monthly retainer of $31,500 during the
Extension Term.


 




3.

Except as expressly
amended by the terms of this Amendment and all prior amendments to
the Consulting Agreement, the terms of the Consulting Agreement
shall remain in effect and are unchanged by this
Amendment.






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment in Dorado, Puerto Rico, this 17th day of
January, 2017.


	


PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.


 


 


By:
/s/ Pedro J.
Lasanta


Name: Pedro
J. Lasanta


Title:  Chief
Financial Officer and Vice President- Finance and


          
Administration and Secretary

	
 

	


STRATEGIC CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL LLC:


 


 


By:
/s/ Elizabeth
Plaza


Name: Elizabeth
Plaza


Title: Consultant


 


 


/s/ Elizabeth
Plaza


Elizabeth
Plaza, individually
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<CAPTION>

<ARTICLE>  7
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET  AND  STATEMENT  INCOME  FOR ANCHOR NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S FORM
10-Q  FOR  THE  QUARTER  ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>           5,668,697,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                      0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                        0
<EQUITIES>                         2,020,000
<MORTGAGE>                       619,470,000
<REAL-ESTATE>                     24,000,000
<TOTAL-INVEST>                 8,097,784,000
<CASH>                         1,292,171,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>         1,014,372,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                25,958,368,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                8,015,393,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                        0
<POLICY-OTHER>                             0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                      0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMON>                           3,511,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                       933,008,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  25,958,368,000
<PREMIUMS>                                 0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>              271,925,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                (6,804,000)
<OTHER-INCOME>                   220,514,000
<BENEFITS>                       203,573,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>       55,876,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>              18,158,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  130,052,000
<INCOME-TAX>                      46,900,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               83,152,000
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                      83,152,000
<EPS-BASIC>                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                             0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                        0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                          0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                         0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                           0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                            0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                    0








</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>                                      
FDS - 3RD QUARTER
</LEGEND>                                     
<CIK>                                              0000006207
<NAME>                                             AMREP CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000
<CURRENCY>                                         U.S. DOLLARS
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JAN-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                  1
<CASH>                                                      11,617
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               68,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                105,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                      33,117
<DEPRECIATION>                                              14,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             229,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                     57,492
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                       740
<OTHER-SE>                                                  87,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               229,051
<SALES>                                                     75,692
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           123,940
<CGS>                                                       60,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               98,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           3,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              5,026
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 1,110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          3,916
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 3,916
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.53
        
 

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-36020) of our report dated February 28, 2003, except for the fourth paragraph of Note 15 as to which the date is March 6, 2003, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of Corautus Genetics Inc. (formerly GenStar Therapeutics Corporation) included in the Annual Report (Form 10K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

|   | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   |                           |

San Diego, California March 26, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          74,353                 250,255
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,353                 250,255
<PP&E>                                           3,239                   2,739
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,128)                   (300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,529                 252,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,824                  15,460
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         7,538                   5,980
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,167                 231,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,705                 252,694
<SALES>                                        193,500                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,500                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  492,677                 443,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (299,177)               (443,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (299,177)               (443,998)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (299,177)               (443,998)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)                   (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

The Board of Director and ShareholdersAltiGen Communications, Inc.

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-94783,333-82090, 333-117000, 333-121753 on Form S-8 ofour report dated December 27, 2005, relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedule of Altigen Communications, Inc.for the years ended September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004, appearingin this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Altigen Communications, Inc.for the year ended September 30, 2006.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, CaliforniaDecember 27, 2006

----
010P15

#### Clifford Roberts Wheeless, III, MD v. Maria Parham Medical Center, Inc., et al.

1. Pit’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA14-612)

1.—

2. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Denied

3. Def’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Allowed

4. Def’s Motion to Dismiss PDR

4. Dismissed as moot

Ervin, J.,

recused
Exhibit 28.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                            THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1996-A

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of The Chase
Manhattan Bank ("Chase"), as Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated as of February 1, 1996 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement")
by and between Chase and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as
trustee (the "Trustee"), does hereby certify that:

         1.       A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period
                  from January 1, 1999 until December 31, 1999 was conducted
                  under my supervision.

         2.       Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my
                  knowledge, fully performed in all material respects all its
                  obligations, and Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. as assignee of
                  the Servicer's repurchase obligations, has fully performed
                  such obligations, under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
                  throughout such period and no material default in the
                  performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing
                  except as set forth in paragraph 3 below.

         3.       None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 15th day of March 2000.



                                                 /s/ Jerry DeRojas
                                                 -----------------
                                                 Jerry DeRojas
                                                 Senior Vice President
#### In the Matter of Diane Schwarz, Respondent, v S & S Auto Repair Center, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[628 NYS2d 735]

In a special proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5241 to recover accrued child support arrears, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), entered December 17,1993, which awarded the petitioner the principal sum of $11,600.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants’ contentions, the underlying income executions were properly entered, as the debtor, Steven Schwarz, failed to allege a mistake of fact with regard to the executions within the statutory period *(see,*CPLR 5241 [e], [fD.

The special proceeding for enforcement was properly commenced by the petitioner purchasing an index number, filing a request for judicial intervention, and attempting to file the notice of petition with the Nassau County Clerk, pursuant to CPLR 304. Contrary to the appellants’ contention there is no requirement that the petition in a proceeding under CPLR 5241 be verified.

The attorney’s fees granted were reasonable.

We have reviewed the appellants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.
#### NATHANIEL W. HOOKER, Respondent, v. WILLIAM R. MARTIN and others, Appellants.

*Forecbswe —judgment in action for*— *talcing of portion of mortgaged property by city for public*me— *effect of*— right *of plaintiff (mortgagee) b the award.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon tbe trial of this action by tbe court without a jury. These actions were brought in the usual form for foreclosure of two purchase-money mortgages, made by the defendant William R. Martin to the plaintiff, upon land in the city of New York. The appellants (Martin, mortgagor, and Arbona, his grantee) answer, setting up the taking of a part of the property described in the mortgage and in the complaint for public use, by which such portion became vested in the mayor, aldermen and commonalty of the city of New York, and aver that the plaintiff, by reason thereof, cannot maintain his action, and that in any event the city should be made a party to the action. An award was made in plaintiff’s name for the land taken, and an assessment laid upon the residue of the land for benefit, in excess of the award. The judgment-establishes that plaintiff is entitled to collect the award for the portion of the mortgaged property taken for public use, and orders sale of the remainder for the payment of the' amount due plaintiff, after crediting defendants with the amount of the award.

The court at General Term said: “ The proceedings of the city in taking a portion of the mortgaged lands for public use did not displace or otherwise affect the lien upon the residue of the mortgaged pTP.miKP.s- So much of the land as was taken by the city was discharged of the lien of the mortgage, and it was not necessary to make the city a party because of its subsequently acquired title thereto, for the reason that the city could not be barred or affected by the foreclosure. The court below awarded judgment in favor of plaintiffs in respect to the moneys awarded for damages in taking the lands by the city, and directed foreclosure and sale for the balance only. This was an equitable disposition of the rights of the parties to the action, and it was not necessary to bring in the city as a party for the purpose of making that disposition. The Code only *303requires other parties to be brought in, in cases where the rights of the parties already before the court cannot be disposed of without the presence of such absent person or parties. That is not the present case.”

*Jas. B. Kissioli,*for the appellants. *Townsend Waddell,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.;

Brady and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
-cv-23074-BB Document 190-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2023 P