alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P. 1


# RCRA Box 321 Prepped byRyan Dugan



### Document

Number: 

# 245 ) OGRC-S003 8 Docket Number: 

# F-93-OGRC-FFFF F

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:33 PM

Sheet 245of 259P. 2

1
- 

### 0£R(L- SOOSf

DATE : 4/29/9 1 NOT E TO : Pau l Bohanno n FROM : Da n Derkic s RE : Apri l 2 , 199 1 lette r Ou r apologie s fo r th e typographica l erro r o n you r address . (Wha t a differenc e a digi t makes! ) I ca n onl yassume tha t th e origina l i s o n it s wayt o th e U S Posta l Service' s "dead letter " office . (Ther e mayb e a chanc e tha t i t coul d b e returne d t o EPA b ytha t office ; i f so , an d w e locat e it , w e wil l b e happyt o retur n i t t o yo u a t th e correc t address) . Attache d i s a copyo f th e lette r reproduce d fromou r bes t availabl e copy . Fo r you r reference , Denni s Rudd yo f m ystaf f drafte d th e response . H e mayb e abl e t o provid e additiona l assistanc e upo n hi s retur n fro mvacatio n nex t Tuesday(Ma y7) . I f ther e i s anything els e w e ca n do , pleas e don' t hesitat e t o contac t hi ma t (703 ) 308-8430 . Thank yo u fo r you r patienc e and , again , ou r regrets . Attachmen t cc : Denni s Rudd

y4h>~ e '^'^\
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5562

To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow a judge to whom a case

is transferred to retain jurisdiction over certain multidistrict litigation

cases for trial.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 2000

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow a judge

to whom a case is transferred to retain jurisdiction over

certain multidistrict litigation cases for trial.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Multidistrict Litigation

5 Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION.

7 Section 1407 of title 28, United States Code, is

8 amended—
2

•HR 5562 IH

1 (1) in the third sentence of subsection (a), by

2 inserting ‘‘or ordered transferred to the transferee

3 or other district under subsection (i)’’ after ‘‘termi4 nated’’; and

5 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub6 section:

7 ‘‘(i)(1) Subject to paragraph (2) and except as pro8 vided in subsection (j), any action transferred under this

9 section by the panel may be transferred for trial purposes,

10 by the judge or judges of the transferee district to whom

11 the action was assigned, to the transferee or other district

12 in the interest of justice and for the convenience of the

13 parties and witnesses.

14 ‘‘(2) Any action transferred for trial purposes under

15 paragraph (1) shall be remanded by the panel for the de16 termination of compensatory damages to the district court

17 from which it was transferred, unless the court to which

18 the action has been transferred for trial purposes also

19 finds, for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and

20 in the interests of justice, that the action should be re21 tained for the determination of compensatory damages.’’.
3

•HR 5562 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

3 any civil action pending on or brought on or after the date

4 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cr-20508-PCH/Becerra-6

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

IVAN COTO,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING R&R AND ADJUDICATING DEFENDANT 

GUILTY

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra’s 

Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on Change of Plea [ECF No. 87], which was entered on 

March 1, 2023. In the R&R, Judge Becerra found that the Defendant Ivan Coto, freely and 

voluntarily entered a plea of guilty as to Counts I and 4 of the Superseding Indictment, which 

charges Defendant with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in 

violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846; and with possession with intent to distribute a 

controlled substance in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(1).

Magistrate Judge Becerra recommends that this Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea, that 

Defendant be adjudicated guilty of Counts I and 4, and that a sentencing hearing be conducted for 

final disposition of this matter. The Court has reviewed Judge Becerra’s R&R, no objections have 

been filed, and the Court has been advised that no objections will be filed. Therefore, based on a 

de novo review of the evidence presented, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that (1) Magistrate Judge Becerra’s R&R on Change of 

Plea is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED in its entirety; (2) the Court accepts Defendant’s plea of 

guilty, and Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty as to CountsI and 4 of the Superseding Indictment;

Case 1:22-cr-20508-PCH Document 109 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2023 Page 1 of 2
and (3) a sentencing hearing before the Honorable Paul C. Huck is set for Monday, April 24, 

2023, at 2:00 PM.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida on March 3, 2023.

PAUL C. HUCK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to:

Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra

Counsel of record

Case 1:22-cr-20508-PCH Document 109 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 102-80.30 What are Federal agencies' responsibilities concerning lead? Federal agencies have the following responsibilities concerning lead in buildings: ( a ) Test space for lead-based paint in renovation projects that require sanding, welding or scraping painted surfaces.
( b ) Not remove lead based paint from surfaces in good condition.
( c ) Test all painted surfaces for lead in proposed or existing child care centers.
( d ) Abate lead-based paint found in accordance with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Lead-Based Paint Guidelines, available by writing to HUD USER, P.O. Box 6091, Rockville, MD 20850.
( e ) Test potable water for lead in all drinking water outlets.
( f ) Take corrective action when lead levels exceed the HUD Guidelines.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 23, 2009 

l0316 

Order 

 

March 23, 2009 

137324 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHGIAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137324 

 COA: 286169 

Wayne CC: 07-020980 

JAMARR ROBERT JOHNSON, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 1, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128481 Marilyn Kelly & (31) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

BOBBY GILLEYLEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 128481 

 COA: 260010 

Macomb CC: 2001-000658-NO 

JAMES HARRINGTON and 2002-000212-CK 

GLORIA HARRINGTON, 2004-000182 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the claims advanced by 

appellant are completely lacking in merit. The motion for appointment of counsel is 

DENIED because plaintiff is not entitled to appointed counsel. 

l1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
#### § 102-73.165 What is the policy for agency special purpose space delegations?

Subject to the limitations on annual rental amounts, lease terms, and leases on parking spaces cited in §§ 102-73.230 through 102-73.240, the agencies listed below are authorized to acquire special purpose space associated with that agency and, except where otherwise noted, may lease such space for terms, including all options, of up to 20 years. The agencies and types of space subject to special purpose space delegations are specified in §§ 102-73.170 through 102-73.225.
0-cr-06241-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2000 Pa
0-cr-06241-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2000 Pa
0-cr-06241-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2000 Pa
0-cr-06241-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2000 Pa
0-cr-06241-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2000 Pa
Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2023 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of the undersigned registrant (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: April  13, 2011  American International Ventures, Inc.  /s/ Myron Goldstein Myron Goldstein Chief Financial Officer  /s/ Steven Davis Steven Davis Chief Executive Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RANDALL KIEF WARINER,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Nos. 12-30114

 12-30115

D.C. Nos. 3:11-cr-00365-MA

 3:00-cr-00110-MA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Malcolm F. Marsh, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 9, 2012** 

Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

Randall Kief Wariner appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and the consecutive 24-month sentence

FILED

OCT 17 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-30114 & 12-30115

imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Wariner contends that the district court erred by failing to consider

adequately his arguments in support of a time-served sentence, and by failing to

provide adequate and factually accurate reasons for the sentence. The district court

acknowledged Wariner’s arguments, discussed the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing

factors, and explained the reasons for the sentence. Its failure to do more was not

plain error. See United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir.

2010). Moreover, any error committed by the district court with respect to

Wariner’s history of supervised release violations did not affect the sentence

selected. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). 

Wariner also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in

light of the minor nature of his last firearm possession offense, the absence of law

enforcement contact since he absconded from supervised release, and the inability

of his plants to produce potent marijuana. Under the totality of the circumstances

and the section 3553(a) sentencing factors, the sentence is substantively

reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

AFFIRMED.
NUMBER 13-15-00513-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

KEVIN LOZANO A/K/A 

KEVIN LOZAWO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 357th District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was due on November 13, 2017. Pursuant to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2), on November 15, 2017, the Clerk of the Court notified 

appellant’s counsel that the brief had not been timely filed, requested counsel to file a 

response concerning the failure to file the brief within ten days, and warned counsel that 
2

the Court would abate and remand this cause to the trial court for appropriate findings if 

a response was not filed. Counsel has nevertheless failed to file either a response or an 

appellate brief in this matter. 

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make 

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether 

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a 

brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant 

has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant’s counsel should 

be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that 

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to 

court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant 

in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone 

number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing 

counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record 

of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental 
3

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

9th day of January, 2018.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 23, 2022

No. 04-21-00233-CV

VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY,

Appellant

v.

Manuel FLORES,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CV06515

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee Manuel Flores has filed a motion for extension of time to file his motion for 

rehearing. Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s motion for rehearing is due October 3, 

2022. 

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of August, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
Natoma

Manors

Bay

Heights

Golden Pines

North

Grove

Shorecrest

Bay Point

Miami International Airport

Morningside

Grapeland Heights

Little Havana Dodge Island

Shenandoah

Virginia Key

Auburndale

Liberty City

Silver Bluff

Wynwood

Little River

Downtown

The Roads

Allapattah

Little Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

C

O

C

O

N

U

T

G

R

O

V

E

pU

ep Er sa St edi

r et a wegdE

P

2

-

Plain

tiffs’ M

a

p

2

Districts

12345

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-35 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-117.380 What should be contained in a Transportation Officer warrant to acquire transportation services? The warrant for authority to acquire transportation services for freight and cargo, including HHGs, issued by the agency head or their designee should: ( a ) State that you have sufficient experience (any combination of Federal, public, and/or commercial) and/or training in transportation services, including any relevant acquisition or certifying officer training, that qualifies you to acquire the transportation services needed by your agency;
( b ) List the maximum dollar limit, if any, and any other limits, such as the types of services that you may acquire;
( c ) State your agency's necessary conditions to maintain the warrant; and
( d ) Include an expiration date for the warrant, recommended not to exceed three years from the date of issuance.
EXHIBIT NO. 10
                             ALLEN ORGAN COMPANY
                          EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN
                        EFFECTIVE CALENDAR YEAR 1996
                                      
            Adopted by the Board of Directors on October 24, 1996

1.   The company desires to provide incentive and reward to the executives
     for their individual effort and productivity on a measurable basis.

2.   Definitions

     Participants - those officers of the corporation as designated by the
     Board of Directors.

     Date of Incentive Determination - the last calendar day of the fiscal
     year for which the incentive is being computed.

     Non-Operating Gains or Losses - infrequent and unusual results as
     determined by the Board of Directors not normally a part of the annual
     pre-tax income.

3.   The total incentive payment shall be calculated as 1.0% of the
     consolidated company pre-tax income for the subject fiscal year after
     elimination of the incentive accrual and Non-Operating Gains or Losses.

4.   The plan will divide the participants into two categories for
     calculation of individual incentive payments.

     (a). Group 1 shall constitute executives named as officers of Allen
     Organ Company prior to 1990.  Group 1 participants will receive a total
     75% (3/4) of the total incentive payment as calculated from item 3.

     (b). Group 2 shall constitute all executives named as officers of Allen
     Organ Company since 1991.  Group 2 participants will receive a total
     25% (1/4) of the total incentive payment as calculated from item 3.

5.   The total incentive payment calculated from the formula will be
     distributed to each participant in each group in a proportion equal to
     each participants annual salary payment in relation to the total annual
     salary of all participants included within that group.  The annual
     salary shall be the weekly rate in effect at the date of calculation
     paid on a fifty-two week payment schedule, thus eliminating extra
     payments for unused vacations or personal days.

6.   To participate in the plan for the fiscal year for which the incentive
     payment is being computed, a participant must be employed by the
     company on the last day of the fiscal year for which the payment is
     being computed and have worked a minimum of thirty (30) average hours
     per week for the fiscal year.

7.   The incentive payment is to be calculated upon completion of the fiscal
     year audit by the company's certified accountants.  All figures used in
     the calculations, other than the individual payment amounts, shall be
     rounded to the nearest one thousand ($1,000) dollars.  The incentive is
     to be accrued in the fiscal year for which the calculation is made and
     paid in cash to the participants within sixty (60) days after the close
     of the fiscal year.

8.   This plan is instituted for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 and
     shall continue for each fiscal year thereafter subject to amendment or
     revocation by the Board of Directors.
#### § 3050.14 Format of the Postal Service's section 3652 report.

The Postal Service's Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA) report shall be presented in a format reflecting the classification structure in the Mail Classification Schedule.

[79 FR 24336, Apr. 30, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         124
<SECURITIES>                                   554
<RECEIVABLES>                                  681
<ALLOWANCES>                                   21
<INVENTORY>                                    78
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,524
<PP&E>                                         2,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,534
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          69,592
<BONDS>                                        250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,307
<OTHER-SE>                                     (76,351)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (2,762)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,752
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (60)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (60)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (60)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.06)
        

</TABLE>