alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

In the Matter of: MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC 

FAA Order No. 2015-2 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0040 1 

Served: June 4, 2015 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL' 

By notice served on May 29,2015, Complainant withdrew its appeal of the initial 

decision served by Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin on April 10, 2015. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT. 

Complainant's appeal is dismissed. 

MICHAEL P. HUERTA, ADMINISTRATOR 

Federal Aviation Administration 

I1C' VICKI S. LEEMON3 

~ Manager, Adjudication Branch 

1 Generally, materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket are also available for viewing at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 14 C.F.R. § 13.210(e)(l). 

2 The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the rules of 

practice, and other infonnation, are available on the Internet at the following address: 

www.faa.gov/about!office _ org/headquarters _offices/age/pol_ adjudication/ AGC400/Civii_Penalty/. See 

14 C.F.R. § 13.210(e)(2). In addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation 

Decisions. Finally, the decisions are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw (FTRANFAA database). For additional information, see the Web site. 

3 Issued under authority delegated to the Chief Counsel and the Assistant Chief Counsel for 

Litigation by memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S.C. § 322(b) and 14 C.F.R. § 13.202 

(see 57 Fed. Reg. 58,280 (I 992)) and redelegated by the Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation to the 

Manager, Adjudication Branch, by Memorandum dated August 6, 1993.
#### Anthony Koehler v. Charles E. Summers.

Filed October 16, 1894.

No. 5584.

Review: Transcript: Motion for New Trial: Assignments of Error. In order to^obtaln a review iu this court of matters occurring on the trial in the district court, it must appear that the errors complained of were called to the attention of the district court by a motion for a new trial. A record which discloses that a motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, but which does not disclose the grounds of such motion, is insufficient for this purpose.

Error from the district court of Eillmore county. Tried below before Hastings, J.

*Charles H. Sloan,*for plaintiff in error.

*John D. Carson,*and *D. IT. Conant, contra.*

*331Irvine, C.

All the errors assigned in this case relate to matters occurring upon the trial. None of these can be considered, for the reason that the record does not contain any motion for a new trial. It is true that the transcript shows that a motion for a new trial was filed and overruled; but in order to obtain a review in this court of matters occurring on the trial it is essential, not only that there should have been a motion for a new trial, but that the errors complained of should have been in that motion called to the attention of the district court. In the absence from the transcript of the motion for a new trial we cannot say, or presume, that the errors complained of were called to the-attention of the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.
#### § 102-75.650 When must DOI request assignment of the property?

Within 30 calendar days after the expiration of the 30-calendar day period specified in § 102-75.640, DOI must submit to the disposal agency an assignment recommendation along with a copy of the application or inform the disposal agency that a recommendation will not be made for assignment of the property.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40165 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WILLIAM VIVAR-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-73-1

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for William Vivar-Lopez, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vivar-Lopez has not filed a response. Our review of the briefs and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                             Fiscal Year Ended
                                                                ----------------------------------------
                                                                March 27,        March 28,     March 29,
                                                                  1999             1998          1997
                                                                --------        ----------    ----------
<S>                                                             <C>             <C>           <C>
Basic earnings per share:

      Weighted average shares outstanding                          9,096             8,863         8,709
                                                                ========        ==========    ==========

      Net  (loss) income                                        $ (5,538)       $      629    $      449
                                                                ========        ==========    ==========

      Basic (loss) earnings per share                           $  (0.61)       $     0.07    $     0.05
                                                                ========        ==========    ==========

Diluted (loss) earnings per share:
      Weighted average shares outstanding                          9,096             8,863         8,709

      Common stock equivalents: stock options (1)                     --               669           866
                                                                --------        ----------    ----------
                                                                   9,096             9,532         9,575
                                                                ========        ==========    ==========

      Net (loss) income                                         $ (5,538)       $      629    $      449
                                                                ========        ==========    ==========

      Diluted (loss) earnings per share                         $  (0.61)       $     0.07    $     0.05
                                                                ========        ==========    ==========

</TABLE>


(1) Stock options based on the treasury stock method using average market price.
#### § 128-1.8000 Scope.

This subpart establishes a Seismic Safety Program for the Department of Justice and sets forth the policies and procedures for obtaining compliance with Executive Order 12699 (Executive Order), “Seismic Safety of Federal and Federally Assisted or Regulated New Building Construction.”
PSD Application Update Request (for BO)

Roger Kohn to: 'Gary Chandler' 

(grchandler@apexpowergroup.com) 10/11/2012 04:56 PM

Cc:

"'W. David Jenkins'", "'Steve Hill'", Eric_Porter, Jim_Bartel, 

Karen_Goebel, mafoster

Please see our attached letter requesting a PSD application update to address the RPMs and terms and 

conditions of the FWS BO.

10-11-12 BO letter.pdf

Roger Kohn

USEPA Region 9 - Air Division (AIR-3)

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

415-972-3973 

kohn.roger@epa
# Comments on: 21-2348: LKQ CORPORATION v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC [OPINION], Nonprecedential
#### § 109-50.103 Definitions.

As used in this subpart the following definitions apply: *Book value* means acquisition cost less depreciation. *DOE Financial Assistance Rules* (10 CFR part 600) means the DOE regulation which establishes a uniform administrative system for application, award, and administration of assistance awards, including grants and cooperative agreements.

*Eligible institution* means any nonprofit educational institution of higher learning, such as universities, colleges, junior colleges, hospitals, and technical institutes or museums located in the United States and interested in establishing or upgrading energy-oriented education programs.

*Energy-oriented education program* means one that deals partially or entirely in energy or energy-related topics.
#### § 105-8.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency, except for programs or activities conducted outside the United States that do not involve individuals with handicaps in the United States.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 660 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 660

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
For the private relief of Ruth Hairston by waiver of a filing deadline 
  for appeal from a ruling relating to her application for a survivor 
                                annuity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF DEADLINE FOR APPEAL.

    For purposes of a petition by Mrs. Ruth Hairston for review of the 
final order issued October 31, 1995, by the Merit Systems Protection 
Board with respect to its docket number SF-0831-95-0754-I-1, the 30-day 
filing deadline in section 7703(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code, 
is waived.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 22-0005 

IN RE THE MOTION OF ANDREA R. HANEY 

FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE 

OF MONTANA 

ORDER 

Andrea R. Haney has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of Montana 

pursuant to Rule V ofthe Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions 

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on 

Character and Fitness has certified that Haney has provided the necessary documentation 

and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. 

Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Andrea R. Haney may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. 

t-L4 

DATED this day of May, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

eef e.., 

05/03/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0005
SU AI .••4-t, 

Justices 

2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00751

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J .J.F.R., JR. and G.L.R. , Children

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 01451

Honorable John Gabriel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, that portion of the trial court’s

September 1, 2015 Order concerning the division of the marital estate is REVERSED and we

REM AND the cause to the trial court for a new trial on the division of the marital estate. The

remainder of the order is AFFIRMED

.

Costs are assessed against the party that incurred them.

SIGNED July 20, 2016.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### § 109-39.105-2 Agency requests to withdraw participation.

Should circumstances arise that would tend to justify discontinuance or curtailment of participation by a DOE organization of a given interagency fleet management system, the participating organization should forward complete details to the DPMO for consideration and possible referral to the Administrator of General Services.
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.                                     /s/ Paul J. Evanson   Paul J. Evanson  August 8, 2007 Principal Executive Officer
§ 105-54.311 Complaint procedures. ( a ) Any person whose request for access to an advisory committee document is denied may seek administrative review under 41 CFR 105-60, which implements the Freedom of Information Act. (See GSA Order, GSA regulations under the “Freedom of Information Act” (ADM 7900.3A).)
( b ) Aggrieved individuals or organizations may file written complaints on matters not involving access to documents with the Deputy Administrator, General Services Administration, Washington, DC 20405. Complaints must be filed within 90 calendar days from the date the grievance arose. The Deputy Administrator promptly acts on each complaint and notifies the complainant in writing of the decision.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION AS OF
AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             538
<SECURITIES>                                     1,350
<RECEIVABLES>                                      516
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         75
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,688
<PP&E>                                           2,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,066
<BONDS>                                            265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,307
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,405)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (3,579)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,109
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  23
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.17)
<FN>
<F1>The Company reports Accounts Receivable Net of Allowance for doubtful accounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 102-75.350 What are disposal agencies' responsibilities concerning public benefit conveyances?

Based on a highest and best use analysis, disposal agencies may make surplus real property available to State and local governments and certain non-profit institutions or organizations at up to 100 percent public benefit discount for public benefit purposes. Some examples of such purposes are education, health, park and recreation, the homeless, historic monuments, public airports, highways, correctional facilities, ports, and wildlife conservation. The implementing regulations for these conveyances are found in this subpart.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLee-side flow over delta wings at supersonic speedsAn experimental investigation of the lee-side flow on sharp leading-edge delta wings at supersonic speeds has been conducted. Pressure data were obtained at Mach numbers from 1.5 to 2.8, and three types of flow-visualization data (oil-flow, tuft, and vapor-screen) were obtained at Mach numbers from 1.7 to 2.8 for wing leading-edge sweep angles from 52.5 deg to 75 deg. From the flow-visualization data, the lee-side flows were classified into seven distinct types and a chart was developed that defines the flow mechanism as a function of the conditions normal to the wing leading edge, specifically, angle of attack and Mach number. Pressure data obtained experimentally and by a semiempirical prediction method were employed to investigate the effects of angle of attack, leading-edge sweep, and Mach number on vortex strength and vortex position. In general, the predicted and measured values of vortex-induced normal force and vortex position obtained from experimental data have the same trends with angle of attack, Mach number, and leading-edge sweep; however, the vortex-induced normal force is underpredicted by 15 to 30 percent, and the vortex spanwise location is overpredicted by approximately 15 percent.Document ID19850021609Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsMiller, D. S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Wood, R. M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1985Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberL-15888NASA-TP-2430NAS 1.60:2430Accession Number85N29921Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850021609.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>  000004187
<NAME> INDUSTRIAL SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,836,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,499,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,000
<INVENTORY>                                    637,702
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,154,027
<PP&E>                                       4,360,772
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,303,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,565,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,677,520
<BONDS>                                          5,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,575
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,702,146
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,565,575
<SALES>                                     18,869,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,141,508
<CGS>                                       16,345,378
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,988,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                182,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                    70,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            112,890
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   112,890
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Michael J. DeeName:

Michael J. DeeTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ William C. Wiedel, Jr.Name:

William C. Wiedel, Jr.Title:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: September 25, 2009
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.212-5 Consolidated or joint hearings.

In cases in which the same or related facts are asserted to constitute noncompliance with this subpart 101-6.2 with respect to two or more Federal statutes, authorities, or other means by which Federal financial assistance is extended and to which this subpart applies, or noncompliance with this subpart and the regulations of one or more other Federal departments or agencies issued under title VI of the Act, the Administrator may, by agreement with such other departments, or agencies, where applicable, provide for the conduct of consolidated or joint hearings, and for the application to such hearings of rules of procedure not inconsistent with this regulation. Final decisions in such cases, insofar as this subpart is concerned, shall be made in accordance with § 101-6.213.