alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The
Alpine Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2005
(the "Periodic Report"), the undersigned, Steven S. Elbaum, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and David A. Owen, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 13, 2005                           /s/  STEVEN S. ELBAUM
                                             Steven S. Elbaum
                                             Chief Executive Officer


                                             /s/ DAVID A. OWEN
                                             David A. Owen
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Employers of National Service (EONS) 

recognize AmeriCorps alumni and

Returned Peace Corps Volunteers

have skills and experience to get the job 

done. There are more than 1 million 

AmeriCorps members and more than 

241,000 Returned Peace Corps 

Volunteers who are flexible, innovative, 

and prepared to lead.

To get the most out of this network:

1 Include the EONS logo and language encouraging 

AmeriCorps and Peace Corps alumni to apply on 

career sites and applications

“We support service to community, with national & international impact, & 

the ability to make a difference. We give special hiring consideration to 

AmeriCorps alumni and Returned Peace Corps Volunteers. ”

2 Provide special hiring consideration for AmeriCorps 

and Peace Corps alumni

3 Attend an EONS career fair or employer event 

Thank you to our partners: Peace Corps, AmeriCorps Alums, Service Year Alliance, National Peace Corps Association.

Share your commitment and use #600employers

on social media. Invite others to join!

Interested employers can visit 

americorps.gov/employers

to learn more and join the network.

THANK YOU for being one of the 600+ Employers of National Service.
032PA15

#### Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority v. Sherbreda Lofton

Motion to Admit Erik R. Zimmerman *Pro Hae Vice*

Allowed 09/01/2015

Ervin, J.,

recused
#### § 102-75.955 Who is responsible for decontaminating excess and surplus real property?

The landholding agency is responsible for all expenses to the Government and for the supervision of the decontamination of excess and surplus real property that has been contaminated with hazardous materials of any sort. Extreme care must be exercised in the decontamination, management, and disposal of contaminated property in order to prevent such properties from becoming a hazard to the general public. The landholding agency must inform the disposal agency of any and all hazards involved relative to such property to protect the general public from hazards and to limit the Government's liability resulting from disposal or mishandling of hazardous materials.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000004187
<NAME> INDUSTRIAL SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,050,152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,903,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                    86,522
<INVENTORY>                                  2,226,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,517,577
<PP&E>                                       8,777,144
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,352,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,566,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,054,730
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,575
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,808,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,566,358
<SALES>                                     56,212,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,212,287
<CGS>                                       51,643,069
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,643,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,688,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               142,652
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             163,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                574,661
<INCOME-TAX>                                   229,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            344,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   344,797
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18


</TABLE>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: ORDER AMENDING RULE 2572 OF THE PENN SYLVANIA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE : : : : : : : NO. 266 APPELLATE PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA M**  **AN D**  **NOW**, this 14th day of February, 201 7 , upon the recommendation of the Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee ; the proposal having been submitted without publication pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(a ) in the interest of efficient administration : It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rule 2572 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure is amended in the attached form. This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective April 1, 2017

.
Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined. Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81514-CIV-CANNON

JANE ARCHER,

Plaintiff,

v.

PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES INC.,

EDENS OF SOUTH CAROLINA LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP, INC. and JANE DOE, 

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and 

Costs [ECF No. 17], filed on November 14, 2022. On January 23, 2023, following referral 

[ECF No. 18], Magistrate Judge Reinhart issued a Report recommending that the Motion be denied 

[ECF No. 22]. Plaintiff timely filed an objection to the Report [ECF No. 23]. The Court has 

reviewed the Motion [ECF No. 17], the Report [ECF No. 22], Plaintiff’s Objection [ECF No. 23], 

and is otherwise advised in the premises.

Upon de novo review, the Court finds the Report to be well-reasoned and correct. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 22] is ACCEPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [ECF No. 17] is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 9th day of March 2023.

 ________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81514-AMC Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-35.10 How are these regulations for the disposal of personal property organized? The General Services Administration (GSA) has divided its regulations for the disposal of personal property into the following program areas: ( a ) Disposition of excess personal property (part 102-36 of this subchapter B).
( b ) Donation of surplus personal property (part 102-37 of this subchapter B).
( c ) Sale of surplus personal property (part 102-38 of this subchapter B).
( d ) Replacement of personal property pursuant to the exchange/sale authority (part 102-39 of this subchapter B).
( e ) Utilization and disposition of personal property with special handling requirements (part 102-40 of this subchapter B).
( f ) Disposition of seized, forfeited, voluntarily abandoned, and unclaimed personal property (part 102-41 of this subchapter B).
( g ) Utilization, donation, and disposal of foreign gifts and decorations (part 102-42 of this subchapter B).
[72 FR 10085, Mar. 7, 2007, as amended at 87 FR 6043, Feb. 3, 2022]
#### § 102-83.150 What portions of this part are severable?

All provisions of this part are separate and severable from one another. If any provision is stayed or determined to be invalid, it is GSA's intention that the remaining provisions will continue in effect.
#### Commonwealth, et al. v. First Christian Church of Louisville. Same v. Starks.

(Decided June 16, 1916.)

Appeals from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).

ROWAN HARDIN for appellants.

HELM BRUCE, I-I. 'L. STONE, HENRY M. JOHNSON and M. S. BARKER for appellees.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hurt

Overruling petition for rehearing and modifying opinion. Por opinion see 169 Ky. 410.

The petition for rehearing calls attention to the fact, that the proceeding by the Commonwealth against the appellee, John P. Starks, was an appeal from a judgment by which a demurrer was sustained to the petition of appellant, and expresses a fear that under *63the terms of the opinion, npon the return of the case to the court, below, the appellee would be precluded from filing an answer and offering any valid defense, that he may have, based npon the facts of the controversy. This court did not overlook the fact, that the question before it was simply whether' or not the petition stated a cause of action. The opinion was written, bearing in mind, the elementary rule, that for the purposes of the demurrer the truth of the allegations of the petition was admitted, and the conclusions of the opinion are based upon that presumption, as in any other case. The opinion expressly holds, simply, that' the demurrer should have been overruled. It was in nowise intended to make a final adjudication of the case or to preclude any valid defense, based upon the facts of the controversy. The petition for rehearing is therefore overruled, and if any expressions in the opinion are susceptible of the construction, that the appellee is precluded from offering an answer and presenting any valid defense,, based upon the facts of the controversy, the opinion is modified to the extent herein stated.
#### § 102-40.25 How do we request a deviation from these requirements and who can approve it?

See §§ 102-2.60 through 102-2.110 of this chapter to request a deviation from the requirements of this part.
§ 102-75.1015 Are there any restrictions on Federal agencies concerning property donations to public bodies? Yes, Federal agencies must obtain prior concurrence of GSA before donating to public bodies— ( a ) Improvements on land or related personal property having a current estimated fair market value in excess of $250,000; and
( b ) Land, regardless of cost.
#### § 102-118.365 Can my agency renew an exemption from the transportation prepayment audit requirements?

It may be possible for your agency to be granted a prepayment audit exemption extension. Your agency must submit a request for the extension to GSA Transportation Audits Division at least six months in advance of the current exemption expiration.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23171-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARBITRADE LTD.;

CRYPTOBONTIX INC.;

TORY R.J. HOGG;

JAMES L. GOLDBERG;

STEPHEN L. BRAVERMAN;

MAX W. BARBER;

SION TRADING FZE,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Order of 

Dismissal of Certain Defendants (“Motion”), ECF No. [67], filed on March 10, 2023. The Court 

has reviewed the Motion, the record in this case, the relevant case law, and is otherwise fully 

advised. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is granted.

On February 8, 2023, the Court entered its Order on Default Procedures, ECF No. [43], in 

which it ordered Plaintiff to submit a Motion for Entry of Clerk’s Default no later than February 

22, 2023, if Defendants Max W. Barber (“Barber”) and SION Trading FZE (“SION”) failed to file 

any response to the Complaint. Id. On February 15, 2023, Barber moved for an extension of time 

to respond to the Complaint on behalf of himself and SION. See ECF No. [56]. The Court granted 

in part and denied in part the Motion for Extension of time, explaining that because Defendant 

SION is an entity it must be represented by counsel and cannot be represented by an individual 

Case 1:22-cv-23171-BB Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/13/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-23171-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

2

appearing pro se. ECF No. [57]. The extension of time requested by Defendant Max W. Barber on 

behalf of Defendant Sion Trading FZE was therefore denied. Id. On February 23, 2023, the Court 

entered an Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice, dismissing SION without prejudice because 

Plaintiff had not filed a motion for entry of clerk’s default in accordance with the Court’s Order 

on Default Procedures. See ECF No. [64]. 

In the instant Motion, Plaintiff seeks relief from its order dismissing SION. The Court finds 

good cause to grant the relief requested. However, the parties are cautioned that failure to comply 

with the Court’s orders will result in appropriate sanctions, including, but not limited to, dismissal 

without further notice.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motion, ECF No. [67], is GRANTED.

2. The Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice, ECF No. [64], is VACATED.

3. Plaintiff shall submit a Motion for Entry of Clerk’s Default with respect to SION 

no later than March 20, 2023, that includes the certificate of service indicating that 

notice of this Order was sent to SION, including the address or addresses to which 

it was sent. 

4. The Clerk is directed to REINSTATE Defendant SION Trading FZE.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on March 13, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23171-BB Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/13/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 105-64.108 How does GSA safeguard personal information? ( a ) System managers will establish administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of records, protect the records against possible threats or hazards, and permit access only to authorized persons. Automated systems will incorporate security controls such as password protection, verification of identity of authorized users, detection of break-in attempts, firewalls, or encryption, as appropriate.
( b ) System managers will ensure that employees and contractors who have access to personal information in their system will have the proper background investigation and meet all privacy training requirements.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 0:22-cv-62336-JIC

JONATHAN HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLOKEL ENTERPRISES, INC., AND

RONAN GIDEKEL, 

Defendants. 

/

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

Defendants, FLOKEL ENTERPRISES, INC. (“Flokel”) and RONAN GIDEKEL 

(“Gidekel”), through counsel, file their Response to Plaintiff’s Statement of Claim 

[D.E. 39], as follows: 

1. Defendants deny that Plaintiff worked 15 hours of overtime per week. Defendants 

assert that Plaintiff grossly exaggerated the amount of his claim and made little to no effort to 

accurate calculate his damages, which he could have easily done based on his paystubs. 

2. In the past three years Plaintiff worked a total of 112.21 hours of overtime. Based 

on Plaintiff’s representation that he was paid his regular rate for all hours worked (i.e., $21.00 

per hour), Plaintiff is owed at best, if anything, $1,234.31 ($11.00 allegedly owed per hour of 

overtime x 112.21 hours of overtime worked). 

1

Case 0:22-cv-62336-JIC Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2023 Page 1 of 3
3. Defendants dispute that liquidated damages are warranted, as any alleged 

violation of the FLSA by the Defendants was not committed willfully or recklessly, but rather 

any action by Defendants was taken in good faith and based on a reasonable belief that it was not 

a violation of the FLSA. Nevertheless, if the Court awards Plaintiff liquidated damages, 

Plaintiff’s best case scenario would be the total of $1,234.21. 

4. Copies of paystubs and time cards are being provided to Plaintiff’s counsel 

concurrently with this Response. 

. Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Juliana Gonzalez, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 54660

MG Legal Group, P.A.

3126 Center Street

Coconut Grove, FL 33133

Tel. (305) 448-9557

Fax. (305) 448-9559

juliana@ljmpalaw.com

office@mglegalgroup.com

Counsel for Defendants

2

Case 0:22-cv-62336-JIC Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2023 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I electronically filed the foregoing document with 

the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF; and that the foregoing document is served on 

this 25th day of January, 2023, to all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on 

the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of the 

notices of Electronic Filing generated by the CM/ECF or in some other authorized 

manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically 

Notices of Electronic Filing. 

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Juliana Gonzalez, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 54660

MG Legal Group, P.A.

3126 Center Street

Coconut Grove, FL 33133

Tel. (305) 448-9557

Fax. (305) 448-9559

juliana@ljmpalaw.com

office@mglegalgroup.com

Counsel for Defendants

SERVICE LIST

Brian Pollock, Esq. 

brian@fairlawattorney.com 

Toussaint Cummings, Esq. 

toussaint@fairlawattorney.com

Fairlaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Ave

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff

Service via CM/ECF

3

Case 0:22-cv-62336-JIC Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2023 Page 3 of 3
§ 105-60.806 Advanced payments. ( a ) For requests other than those described in this subpart, GSA cannot require the requester to make an advance payment before work is commenced or continued on a request. Payment owed for work already completed (*i.e.,* payment before copies are sent to a requester) is not an advance payment.
( b ) When GSA determines or estimates that a total fee to be charged under this section shall exceed $250.00, it may require that the requester make an advance payment up to the amount of the entire anticipated fee before beginning to process the request. GSA may elect to process the request prior to collecting fees when it receives a satisfactory assurance of full payment from a requester with a history of prompt payment.
( c ) Where a requester has previously failed to pay a properly charged FOIA fee to GSA within 30 calendar days of the billing date, GSA may require that the delinquent requester pay the full amount due, plus any applicable interest on that prior request, and require that the requester make an advance payment of the full amount of any anticipated fee before the agency begins to process a new request or continues to process a pending request or any pending appeal. If GSA has a reasonable basis to believe that a requester has misrepresented the requester's identity in order to avoid paying outstanding fees, it may require that the requester provide proof of identity.
( d ) In cases in which GSA requires advance payment, the request shall not be considered received and further work shall not be completed until the required payment is received. If the requester does not pay the advance payment within 10 business days after the date of GSA's fee determination, the request shall be closed.
#### § 102-80.90 Is the Fire Administration Authorization Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-522) relevant to fire protection engineering?

Yes, the Fire Administration Authorization Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-522) requires sprinklers or an equivalent level of safety in certain types of Federal employee office buildings, Federal employee housing units, and Federally assisted housing units (15 U.S.C. 2227).
n/30/201 1 12:0 9 FA X202493514 2 FA A - QM S ^001/00 2



## — K tI OPERATION S UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N ?OI I NO V3 0 p ] : 9 ^ Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n

Complainan t

Continenta l Airline s Inc .

Responden t CP11SW000 O CP11SW00OO CP11SW0OO

O CP11SW000 0 FA

A2011-077 6 FA A2011-077 7 FA A2011-077 8 FA A2011-077 4 Judg e Richard C . Goodwi n

WITHDRAWA LO F COMPLAIN T Th e Administrato ran d Responden thav e entere d int o a n agreemen tt o settl e th e above style d matters ; therefore th e Administrato rwithdrav\/ s hi s complaint . Respectfull ysubmitted , Davi d Donnel l Southwes tRegiona l Counse l Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Ti m Duf f' ^ Attorne y (817)222-509 9 

# RECEIVE D MO V1 6 201 1 

# HEARIN G DOCKE T11/30/201 1 12;0 8 FAX 202493514 2 FA A DH S ^oo i

CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I hereb ycertif ytha to n thi s 7* " da yo fNovember , 2011 , th e origina l an d on e copy , respectively , o fth e foregoin g documen twer e sen tvi a facsimil e an d certifie d retur n receip t requeste d to : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington . D C 2059 1 Altn : Hearin g Docke tClerk , AG C -43 0 Wilbu rWrigh tBuildin g - Suit e 2W1000 \ FAX : 202-493-512 3 Jonatha n T . Lind e Senio rCounse l - Regulator y Unite d Airline s an d Continenta l Airlines , Inc . 7 7 W . Wacke rDriv e - IS* " Floo r Chicago , I L6060 1 FAX : 312-997-810 3 Thoma s Newto n Boiling , Respondent' s Counse l Managin g Attorney , Regulator yAffair s Unite d Airline s an d Continenta l Airlines , inc . 7 7 W . Wacke rDriv e - 16' " Floo r Chicago , I L6060 1 FAX : 312-997-810 3 Th e Honorabl e Richar d C Goodwin , Administrativ e La wJudg e U.S . Departmen to fTransportatio n Offic e o fHearings . M-2 0 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S.E . Eas tBuilding , Groun d Floor , Roo m 312-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 FAX : 202-366-753 6

Ailee n C.^yaia , Progra m Analys t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Southwes t Regio n P : 817-222-508 7 F : 817-222-509 2 Dated : Novembe r7 . 201 1