alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6945

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

ANGEL MANUEL GONZALEZ, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, 

Chief District Judge. (3:05-cr-00007-JPB-JES-3; 3:08-cv-00125-

JPB-JES) 

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 26, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and 

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Angel Manuel Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas 

Camilletti, Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Angel Manuel Gonzalez seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will 

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gonzalez has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GS HOLISTIC, LLC

PLAINTIFF(S) 

v.

PSL SMOKE & VAPE SHOP, et al.,

DEFENDANT(S). 

CASE NUMBER

 2:22−cv−14369−AMC

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

Clerk's Default

 It appearing that the defendant(s) herein, is/are in default for failure to appear, answer, or otherwise plead

to the complaint filed herein within the time required by law.

Default is hereby entered against defendant(s)

NAJI FELLOWES

PSL RETAIL CORP

as of course, on the date February 10, 2023.

Angela E. Noble

CLERK OF COURT

By /s/ Collette Quinones

Deputy Clerk

cc: Judge Aileen M. Cannon

 PSL SMOKE & VAPE SHOP

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

CV−37 (10/01)

Case 2:22-cv-14369-AMC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2023 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [Order No. 1095] 

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: 

                    Whereas, the New Jersey Commerce and Economic Growth Commission, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 44, has made application to the Board for authority on behalf of Giuvaudan Roure Corporation to manufacture flavor and fragrance products under FTZ procedures within FTZ 44(FTZ Docket 44-99, filed 9/3/99); Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (64 FR 49442, ­9/13/99); and,                 

Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR § 400.31) provide for the authorization of manufacturing within existing zones when it is in the public interest; Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application is in the public interest; 

                    Now therefore, the Board hereby approves the request subject to the FTZ                           ( print page 37960)                        Act and the Board's regulations, including § 400.28.                 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of June 2000. 

Troy H. Cribb, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

ATTEST: 

Dennis Puccinelli, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-15401 Filed 6-16-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 660

AN ACT

For the private relief of Ruth Hairston by waiver

ing to her application for a survivor annuity.of a filing deadline for appeal from a ruling relat-
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 660

AN ACT

For the private relief of Ruth Hairston by waiver of a

filing deadline for appeal from a ruling relating to her

application for a survivor annuity.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 660 EH

1 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF DEADLINE FOR APPEAL.

2 For purposes of a petition by Mrs. Ruth Hairston

3 for review of the final order issued October 31, 1995, by

4 the Merit Systems Protection Board with respect to its

5 docket number SF–0831–95–0754–I–1, the 30-day filing

6 deadline in section 7703(b)(1) of title 5, United States

7 Code, is waived.

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 99.5

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,

Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of CanWest Global Communications Corp. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended August 31, 2006 of the Company fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 40-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 29, 2006 |  |        |  | /s/ Leonard J. Asper   
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Leonard J. Asper       
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  |       
|Date: November 29, 2006 |  |        |  | /s/ John E. Maguire    
|                        |  | Name:  |  | John E. Maguire        
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGE OF 

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA TO A DIVISION OF 

SAID COURT

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 374 Common Pleas Judicial

Classification Docket

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of August, 2022, upon consideration of the Petition of the 

Honorable Kim Berkeley Clark, President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of the 

Fifth Judicial District of Pennsylvania, for the permanent assignment of the Honorable 

Andrew J. Szefi to the Civil Division of the Court of Common Pleas of the Fifth Judicial 

District of Pennsylvania, said Petition is GRANTED and the requested assignment is 

approved.
Case 9:22-cv-81923-AMC Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 1 of 1
No. 11-9168.

#### Dingle *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT11.2**

 

**DUKE REALTY LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**EARNINGS TO DEBT SERVICECALCULATIONS**

**(inthousands)**

 
| ** **                                                                                                           | ** ** | **DECEMBER 31,  2004** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------|------------|
|                                                                                                                 |       |                   |       |
| Net income from  continuing operations, less preferred distributions                                                 |       | $                      | 142,851    |   |
| Earnings from  sale of land and ownership interests in  unconsolidated companies, net of impairment  adjustment |       | (10,202                | )          |
| Recurring  principal amortization                                                                                    |       | 7,334                  |       |
| Interest expense  (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees)                                                 |       | 130,226                |       |
| Earnings before  debt service                                                                                        |       | $                      | 270,209    |   |
|                                                                                                                 |       |                   |       |
| Interest expense  (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees)                                                 |       | $                      | 130,226    |   |
| Recurring  principal amortization                                                                                    |       | 7,334                  |       |
| Total debt  service                                                                                                  |       | $                      | 137,560    |   |
|                                                                                                                 |       |                   |       |
| **Ratio  of earnings to debt service**                                                                               | ** ** | **1.96**               | ** ** |

 

----
§ 102-33.160 What standards must we establish or require (contractually, where applicable) for management/administration of our flight program? For management/administration of your flight program, you must establish or require (contractually, where applicable)— ( a ) A management structure responsible for the administration, operation, safety, training, maintenance, and financial needs of your aviation operation (including establishing minimum requirements for these items for any commercial contracts); and
( b ) Guidance describing the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of your flight program personnel, *e.g.,* managers, pilots and other crewmembers, flight safety personnel, maintenance personnel, administrative personnel and dispatchers.
§ 102-36.260 How do we promote the expeditious transfer of excess personal property? For expeditious transfer of excess personal property you should: ( a ) Provide complete and accurate property descriptions and condition codes on the report of excess to facilitate the selection of usable property by potential users.
( b ) Ensure that any available operating manual, parts list, diagram, maintenance log, or other instructional publication is made available with the property at the time of transfer.
( c ) Advise the designated recipient of any special requirements for dismantling, shipping/transportation.
( d ) When the excess personal property is located at a facility due to be closed, provide advance notice of the scheduled date of closing, and ensure there is sufficient time for screening and removal of property.
July 6 th , 2015

Mr. Scott C. Lane

2825 Soulier Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15227

Dear Mr. Lane:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA− 2015−1440 ) on

May 11, 2015, but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you

sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to cons ider the

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that i s, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to re ach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will clos e the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# View governing authorities and guidance
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  RESTATED  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
SUPPLEMENTAL  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 13 WEEKS ENDED APRIL 29,
1999, AS INCLUDED IN ALBERTSON'S FORM 8-K FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION  ON JULY 16,  1999,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  FEB-03-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       APR-29-1999
<CASH>                                                 116,123
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          570,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                            21,510
<INVENTORY>                                          3,189,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     4,125,490
<PP&E>                                              13,656,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                       4,946,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      15,180,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,390,244
<BONDS>                                              5,027,115
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                               434,703
<OTHER-SE>                                           5,235,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        15,180,933
<SALES>                                              9,215,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9,215,287
<CGS>                                                6,712,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,712,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      82,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        395,589
<INCOME-TAX>                                           157,098
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    238,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           238,491
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.56


</TABLE>
#### § 102-5.45 Should determinations be completed before an employee is provided with home-to-work transportation?

Yes, determinations should be completed before an employee is provided with home-to-work transportation unless it is impracticable to do so.
No. 11-8388.

#### McPherson *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 102-38.115 What are the specific reporting requirements for negotiated sales? For negotiated sales of personal property, you must— ( a ) In accordance with 40 U.S.C. 545(e), and in advance of the sale, submit to the oversight committees for the General Services Administration (GSA) in the Senate and House, explanatory statements for each sale by negotiation of any personal property with an estimated fair market value in excess of $15,000. You must maintain copies of the explanatory statements in your disposal files. No statement is needed for negotiated sales at fixed price or for any sale made without advertising when authorized by law other than 40 U.S.C. 545; and
( b ) Report annually to GSA, Personal Property Management Policy Division (MTP), 1800 F Street, NW., Washington, DC, 20405, within 60 calendar days after the close of each fiscal year, a listing and description of all negotiated sales of personal property with an estimated fair market value in excess of $5,000. You may submit the report electronically or manually (see § 102-38.330).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15824]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L.92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications 
Systems (1196).
    Date and Time: July 10, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Room 340, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Filbert J. Bartoli, Program Director, Room 
675, Division of Electrical and Communications Systems, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1339.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate XYZ on a Chip proposals submitted 
in response to the program announcement (NSF 00-15).
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.


    Dated: June 19, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15824 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4007

_____________________________
I SSAC J. T ILLMAN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela M. Cox , Judge

. April 22, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The Court has determined that the appeal is untimely. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Any request for belated appeal must be filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

R AY , O STERHAUS , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Issac J. Tillman, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Jeremiah Fleming, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.




Date:
December 13, 2010





By:
              /s/ JEREMIAH FLEMINGName:
      Jeremiah FlemingTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00591

- CV
In the Interest of I. M. V., a child
On Appeal from the 267th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No. 18

- 11

- 83675

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cau se on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant , M.M.C

. , although s he is exempt from payment due to h er inabili ty to pay costs. We further order this decision certified below for obse rvance. March 19, 2020