alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6675

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LAWRENCE MCCOY HOLMAN, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-13, CA-97-282-R) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Steven Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Holman , Nos. CR-95-13; CA-97-282-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 172-19   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-40.210 How do we handle Nuclear Regulatory Commission-controlled materials?

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has exclusive control over licensing, use, transfer, and disposition of NRC-controlled materials. Direct all inquiries to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.
Argued and submitted June 23,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration September 6, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Tivis E. Hay, Claimant. LIBERTY NORTHWEST INSURANCE CORPORATION and Murphy Plywood, *Petitioners, v.*Tivis E. HAY and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(WCB 92-13904, 92-11494, 92-09270; CA A84648)

901 P2d 919

Brian L. Pocock argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

James C. Coffey argued the cause for respondent Tivis E. Hay. With him on the brief was Stebbins & Coffey.

Steven R. Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent SAIF Corporation. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*543PER CURIAM

Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board assigning to it responsibility for claimant’s occupational disease claim.

The statutes pertinent to this review have been amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332. Because the amended version of the statutes is applicable here, we remand for reconsideration in the light of the new law. *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
#### § 102-79.80 May Executive agencies assess fees for antenna placements against telecommunication service providers for antenna site outleases on major pedestrian access levels, courtyards, and rooftops of public buildings?

Yes. GSA, or other Executive agencies, upon approval from GSA, may charge fees based on market value to telecommunication service providers for antenna placements in public buildings. Market value should be equivalent to the prevailing commercial rate for comparable space for commercial antenna placements in the vicinity of the public building. Such fees must be credited to GSA's Federal Buildings Fund.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CV-22920-ALTONAGA/Damian

JAMES WATSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

OSTERIA NUMERO UNO, LTD.

Defendant

_____________________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, JAMES WATSON, by and through the undersigned counsel, 

hereby notifies the Court that the Parties have reached an agreement in principle that resolves all 

claims that were or could have been brought in this action and are in the process of working on the 

Settlement Agreement. The Parties request that the Court stay all matters and pending deadlines 

in this action and grant the Parties sixty (60) days to finalize their written Settlement Agreement 

and to submit the appropriate notices and/or stipulations to the Court regarding dismissal of the 

Action.

Respectfully submitted on this October 21, 2022. 

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

FBN: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-22920-CMA Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/21/2022 Page 1 of 2
Watson v. Osteria Numero Uno, LTD.

Case No.: 22-cv-22920-CMA

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 21, 2022, an electronic copy of the foregoing 

document was filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notice of 

electronic filing to all parties and Counsel of record. 

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

FBN: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-22920-CMA Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/21/2022 Page 2 of 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

STEVEN PARMLEY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1502 ) 2D18-1784 MARY ROSE CAES PARMLEY, ) ) CONSOLIDATED Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed January 23, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Melissa M. Polo, Judge. Steven Parmley, pro se Appellant. Michael Vincent Laurato of Austin & Laurato, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
KHOUZAM, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the "Company"),hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Date:10 May 2006                                                                    

                                                                                               /s/ Michael Hanley                                        

                                                                                               Michael Hanley

Executive VicePresident and 

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.23


IHS MARKIT LTD.


AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED 
MARKIT KEY EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE PROGRAM




Amendment dated as of October 17, 2016 (this “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Markit Key Employee Incentive Program (the “KEIP”).


W I T N E S S E T H


WHEREAS, Markit Ltd., the predecessor company to IHS Markit Ltd. (the “Company”),  entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 20, 2016 (the “Merger Agreement”), with Marvel Merger Sub, Inc. and IHS Inc.; and


WHEREAS, following the consummation of the transactions that were contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the Company desires to amend certain terms and conditions related to equity awards granted pursuant to the KEIP.




NOW THEREFORE, the KEIP is hereby amended as follows:


		
	1.
	AMENDMENT




APPENDIX A of the KEIP is hereby amended to add a paragraph 5 as follows:
 
“5.  Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or any Option (subject to any provisions applicable to a Participant under an Option or individual agreement that contain vesting terms that are more favorable to the Participant than those set forth in this paragraph 5), if a Participant’s Employment is terminated by the Company without Cause within 24 months after the Closing Date (as defined in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 20, 2016, among the Company, Marvel Merger Sub, Inc. and IHS Inc. (the “Merger Agreement”)), and such termination of  Employment is a direct result of the consummation of the Merger (as defined in the Merger Agreement), as determined in the sole discretion of the Company, then all Options held by such Participant that were unvested as the Closing Date shall vest in full immediately on the date of such termination of Employment and any Options held by such Participant as of the Closing Date shall remain exercisable until the earlier of (i) 12 months following the date such termination of Employment or (ii) the expiration of the original Option Option Period of such Option.”


		
	2.
	EFFECTIVENESS OF AMENDMENT




This Amendment will become effective immediately.  Except as amended by the terms of this Amendment, the KEIP will remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Adam M. Moskowitz

Joseph M. Kaye

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

Service@moskowitz-law.com

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice Application Forthcoming)

Stephen Neal Zack

Hon. Ursula Ungaro (Ret.)

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800, Miami, FL 33131

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 11-12 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 11-12 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE ALBERTO CRUZ

- PINEDA, AKA

Ricardo Molina

- Rosales,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 72832

Agency No. A070

- 162

- 288

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 23 , 2017 **

Before: M c KEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Alberto Cruz

- Pineda, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA ” ) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen

. Najmabadi v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 72832

Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010)

. We deny t he petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Cruz

- Pineda ’s motion to

reopen as unti mely where the motion was filed more than fifteen years after the

BIA’s final decision

, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Cruz

- Pineda failed to

provide evidence of a mat er ial change in circumstances in El Salvador to qualify

for a regulatory exception to th e time limitation for filing a motion to reopen, see 8

C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); see also Najmabadi

, 597 F.3d at 991

- 92 (BIA did not

abuse its discretion where petitioner failed to introduce material evidence)

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JANVIER THOMAS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 254 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of October, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-23214-CV-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

CHRISTOPHER HANSEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC,

Defendant.

_____________________________

JOINT MEDIATION REPORT

Pursuant to this Court’s Order Scheduling Mediation [ECF No. 13], Plaintiff and 

Defendant hereby jointly report as follows: (1) All parties participated in mediation with Pamela 

Perry on September 27, 2023 by video conference; and (2) the case settled at mediation and the 

parties will formalize the settlement and inform the Court of the same with an appropriate dismissal 

within 30 days. 

cc: Pamela Perry, Mediator

Dated: October 2, 2023

John R. Byrne

John R. Byrne

Florida Bar No.: 0126294

john@maderalbyrne.com

Nicole Estrada

Florida Bar No.: 1017979

nicole@maderalbyrne.com

Maderal Byrne & Furst PLLC

2800 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 1100

Coral Gables, FL 33134

Telephone: (305)520-5690

Email: john@maderalbyrne.com

Attorney for Christopher Hansen

Lisa B. Heller 

Lisa B. Heller, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 96658 

Email: lheller@condonlaw.com

CONDON & FORSYTH LLP

701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1550 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Tel: (305) 492-7303 

Fax: (212) 370-4453

Attorney for British Airways PLC

Case 1:22-cv-23214-BB Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/02/2023 Page 1 of 1
109P15

#### State v. Thomas Clay Friday

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-529)

Denied
#### § 101-29.501 Optional use of interim Federal specifications.

Interim Federal specifications are for optional use. All agencies are urged to make maximum use of them and to submit suggested changes to the preparing activity for consideration in further development of the specifications for promulgation as Federal specifications or commercial item descriptions. Interim revisions or interim amendments to Federal specifications are for optional use as valid exceptions to the Federal specifications so revised or amended and must, therefore, be specifically identified by symbol and date in the invitation for bids or request for proposal.
Attachment

Baltimore NAA and Maryland 

Zero Emissions Modeling, and 

Washington DC NAA Only 

Emissions Modeling Results 

Modeling Completed by University of 

Maryland College Park (UMD) for the 

Maryland Department of the 

Environment (MDE)
Baltimore NAA Zero-Out Emissions
Baltimore NAA Zero-Out Emissions
Baltimore NAA Zero-Out Emissions
Baltimore NAA Zero-Out Emissions
Baltimore NAA Zero-Out Emissions
Baltimore NAA Zero-Out Emissions
Maryland Zero-Out Emissions
Maryland Zero-Out Emissions
Maryland Zero-Out Emissions
Maryland Zero-Out Emissions
Maryland Zero-Out Emissions
Maryland Zero-Out Emissions
Washington DC NAA Only Emissions
Washington DC NAA Only Emissions
Washington DC NAA Only Emissions
Washington DC NAA Only Emissions
Washington DC NAA Only Emissions
Washington DC NAA Only Emissions
UAVSA Release 1.1 July 2015

U.S. D e p a rtme n t of T r a n sport a t io n

P a g e 1



# Departing Location Protocols

A. PIC: Inform ATC of Completion of Flight Plan if Necessary

B. Final Measure Weather and Check and Mark Pilot ’ s and Operation ’ s Log.

Wind Direction

Wind Velocity

Relative Humidity

Barometric Pressure

Outside Temperature

Flight Duration

Flight Performance

C. Record Flight Notes, and UAS Performance (energy consumed).

D. Safety Debriefing of Flight and Operations Crews.

E. Breakdown UAS and Place in Travel Safety Case.

F. Crew: Carefully Pack Gear and other location Essentials.

1. Gear Checklist in Each Case

2. Make sure each Case has all equipment

3. Refer to each Case Packaging Slip (PDF located in each Case)

G. Case Checklist

1. Make sure all Cases brought to set are accounted for and Mark on Checklist.

H. After each Operations all Company Team are require to attend a Safety

Debriefing.

I. Team Meeting to Discuss Flight what was done correctly and what could have

been better executed.

J. Review All Communications and Discus s Improvements, Failures and Edits for

the Next Flight Operations.

K. Review Company Protocols and Discuss Edits, Changes and or Additions to the

Various Flight and Operations Protocols.

L. Discuss with the Team if the Base Camp Diagram and the Tent Location was laid

out properly and could it be i mproved for the Next Project.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 575

To provide that certain regulations proposed by the Comptroller of the Currency, the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation relating to ‘‘Know Your Customer’’ practices of

financial institutions shall not take effect.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. BAKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To provide that certain regulations proposed by the Comptroller of the Currency, the Director of the Office of

Thrift Supervision, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Federal Deposit Insurance

Corporation relating to ‘‘Know Your Customer’’ practices

of financial institutions shall not take effect.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Know Your Customer

5 Regulations Termination Act’’.
2

•HR 575 IH

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF ‘‘KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER’’ REGU2 LATIONS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—None of the proposed regulations

4 described in subsection (b) may be published in final form

5 and, to the extent any such regulation has become effec6 tive before the date of the date of the enactment of this

7 Act, such regulation shall cease to be effective as of such

8 date.

9 (b) PROPOSED REGULATIONS DESCRIBED.—The

10 proposed regulations referred to in subsection (a) are as

11 follows:

12 (1) The regulation proposed by the Comptroller

13 of the Currency to amend part 21 of title 12 of the

14 Code of Federal Regulations, as published in the

15 Federal Register on December 7, 1998.

16 (2) The regulation proposed by the Director of

17 the Office of Thrift Supervision to amend part 563

18 of title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as

19 published in the Federal Register on December 7,

20 1998.

21 (3) The regulation proposed by the Board of

22 Governors of the Federal Reserve System to amend

23 parts 208, 211, and 225 of title 12 of the Code of

24 Federal Regulations, as published in the Federal

25 Register on December 7, 1998.
3

•HR 575 IH

1 (4) The regulation proposed by the Federal De2 posit Insurance Corporation to amend part 326 of

3 title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as pub4 lished in the Federal Register on December 7, 1998.

5 (c) PROHIBITION ON SIMILAR REGULATIONS.—None

6 of the Federal banking agencies referred to in any para7 graph of subsection (b) may prescribe any regulation

8 which is substantially similar to, or would have substan9 tially the same effect as, any proposed regulation de10 scribed in any such paragraph.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS






|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
    ended June 30, 2005 (the Periodic Report) which
    this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
|  
|2. | Information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
    all material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of AT&T Corp.                                                                                                                            



| |                     
| | --------------------
| | /s/ Thomas W. Horton
| |                     
| | Thomas W. Horton
#### § 101-29.301 General Services Administration.
§ 105-70.017 Rights of parties. Except as otherwise limited by this part, all parties may— ( a ) Be accompanied, represented, and advised by a representative;
( b ) Participate in any conference held by the ALJ;
( c ) Conduct discovery;
( d ) Agree to stipulations of fact or law, which shall be made part of the record;
( e ) Present evidence relevant to the issues at the hearing;
( f ) Present and cross-examine witnesses;
( g ) Present oral argument at the hearing as permitted by the ALJ; and
( h ) Submit written briefs and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law after the hearing.