alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3264]
 Broward County and the contiguous counties of Collier, Dade, Hendry, and Palm Beach in the State of Florida constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by heavy rains that occurred on May 12, 2000. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on August 14, 2000 and for economic injury until the close of business on March 13, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308. The interest rates are: In 
                             percentFor physical damage:Homeowners with credit available elsewhere
7.375Homeowners without credit available elsewhere
3.687Businesses with credit available elsewhere
8.000Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
4.000Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere
6.750For economic injury:Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere
4.000
 The numbers assigned to this disaster are 326406 for physical damage and 9H5400 for economic injury. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008). Dated: June 13, 2000. Kris Swedin, Acting Administrator.


[FR Doc. 00-15703 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMREP  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned
does hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  December 14, 2005

                                                      /s/ Peter M. Pizza
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Peter M. Pizza*
                                                      Vice President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer


                                                      /s/ James Wall
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      James Wall*


                                                      /s/ Michael P. Duloc
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Michael P. Duloc*



--------------
*  The  registrant  is a holding  company  which does  substantially  all of its
   business  through two  wholly-owned  subsidiaries  (and their  subsidiaries).
   Those  wholly-owned  subsidiaries  are AMREP Southwest Inc. ("ASW") and Kable
   Media Services, Inc. ("Kable"). James Wall is the principal executive officer
   of ASW, and Michael P. Duloc is the principal executive officer of Kable. The
   registrant has no chief executive  officer.  Its executive  officers  include
   James Wall,  Senior Vice  President  and Peter M. Pizza,  Vice  President and
   Chief Financial Officer, and Michael P. Duloc, who may be deemed an executive
   officer by reason of his position with Kable.



                                       1
#### § 102-75.385 Do disposal agencies have the responsibility to notify eligible public agencies that airport property has been determined to be surplus?

Yes, the disposal agency must notify eligible public agencies that property currently used as or suitable for use as a public airport under the Surplus Property Act of 1944, as amended, has been determined to be surplus. A copy of the landholding agency's Report of Excess Real Property (Standard Form 118, with accompanying schedules) must be transmitted with the copy of the surplus property notice sent to the appropriate regional office of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA must furnish an application form and instructions for the preparation of an application to eligible public agencies upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15805]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Planning and Steering Advisory Committee (PSAC)

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this meeting is to discuss topics relevant to 
SSBN security.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 13, 2000 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Center for Naval Analyses, 
4401 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Randy Craig, CNO-
N875C2, 2000 Navy Pentagon, NC-1, Washington, DC 20350-2000, (703) 604-
7392.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of meeting is provided per the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2). The entire agenda 
will consist of classified information that is specifically authorized 
by Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national 
defense and is properly classified pursuant to such Executive Order. 
Accordingly, the Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing that 
all sessions of the meeting shall be closed to the public because they 
concern matters listed in 552b(c)(1) of title 5, U.S.C.

    Dated: June 13, 2000.
James L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15805 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
RODNEY E. CALLAHAN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

GOVERNOR RICK SCOTT, ET

AL.

,

Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1044

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 6, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. George S. Reynolds, III , Judge

.

Rodney E. Callahan, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel,

Tallahassee , for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., THOMAS and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001003740
<NAME> THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

<S>                             <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      15,365,439               2,667,347
<SECURITIES>                                 9,906,220                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  567,911                 420,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,839,570               3,088,095
<PP&E>                                       2,030,182               1,980,727
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,085,890)               (963,548)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,023,911               5,653,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          861,304               1,208,759
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 13,642,000               5,427,188
<COMMON>                                       281,186                 205,692
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,023,911               5,653,737
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,869,084               1,434,438
<CGS>                                          644,510                  79,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,062,196               7,556,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               416,632                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 797                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,231,648)            (14,317,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,231,648)            (14,317,488)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,231,648)            (14,276,485)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)                  (1.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)                  (1.80)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5599 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5599

                    For the relief of Eugene Makuch.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2000

 Mr. Reynolds introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Eugene Makuch.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

    In consideration of the fact that Eugene Makuch--
            (1) served as a foreign counterintelligence agent and 
        dedicated his life to assist the Federal Bureau of 
        Investigation in its efforts at the height of the Cold War to 
        combat communism, the Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti 
        (KGB), and the Soviet Union; and
            (2) has not received employment assistance or health, 
        social security, or pension benefits, despite assurances that 
        he would receive such benefits upon his retirement,
the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of funds not otherwise 
appropriated, the sum of $1,000,000 to Eugene Makuch of East Amherst, 
New York, in compensation for the lifetime aggregate value of benefits 
earned but not received by Eugene Makuch.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM.

    The sum paid under section 1 shall be in full satisfaction of any 
claims that Eugene Makuch may have against the United States arising 
out of his service for the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES.

    Not more than 10 percent of the sum paid under section 1 shall be 
paid to or received by any agent or attorney for services rendered in 
connection with the recovery of such sum. Any person who violates this 
section shall be fined under title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company'sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report")fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

| August 13,****2003 | /s/ Travis Engen |
|--------------------|------------------|
|               |             | Travis Engen                            President and Chief Executive Officer |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1661

MOOG, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STEPAN V. LUNIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (2:06-cv-00238-RBS)

Submitted: January 17, 2007 Decided: February 14, 2007

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stepan V. Lunin, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Roy Zahn, MCGUIREWOODS,

L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia; William Harrison Baxter, II,

MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Stepan V. Lunin appeals the district court’s order

granting Moog, Inc.’s (“Moog”) motion for a preliminary injunction

against him. We have reviewed the record and find the district

court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Moog, Inc. v. Lunin, No. 2:06-cv-00238-RBS (E.D. Va.

June 7, 2006). 

Further, we grant Moog’s motions for protective orders,

filed September 6, 2006, September 11, 2006, September 15, 2006,

September 25, 2006, and September 29, 2006, in which Moog seeks to

seal various pleadings Lunin filed with this court. However, we

deny Moog’s September 18, 2006 motion for a protective order

because the document this motion targets was never filed with this

court. Further, we deny Moog’s August 29, 2006 motion for a

protective order because it is duplicative of the relief requested

in the September 6, 2006 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 9:22-cv-81923-AMC Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 1 of 1
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>         5
  <LEGEND>
  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
  consolidated statement of financial condition at September 30, 1999
  (unaudited) and the consolidated statement of income for the nine months
  ended September 30, 1999 (unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by
  reference to such financial statements.
  </LEGEND>
  <MULTIPLIER>      1

  <S>                         <C>        <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1999
  <PERIOD-START>                          Jan-01-1999
  <PERIOD-END>                            Sep-30-1999
  <CASH>                                       43,718
  <SECURITIES>                                    -0-
  <RECEIVABLES>                                   -0-
  <ALLOWANCES>                                    -0-
  <INVENTORY>                                     -0-
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                             43,718
  <PP&E>                                          -0-
  <DEPRECIATION>                                  -0-
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                              122,170
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           -0-
  <BONDS>                                         -0-
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           -0-
  <PREFERRED>                                     -0-
  <COMMON>                                    314,080
  <OTHER-SE>                                 <191,910>
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                122,170
  <SALES>                                         -0-
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                -0-
  <CGS>                                           -0-
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                   -0-
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                             83,263
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                -0-
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              -0-
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                 -0-
  <INCOME-TAX>                                    -0-
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                             -0-
  <DISCONTINUED>                              <37,592>
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                 -0-
  <CHANGES>                                       -0-
  <NET-INCOME>                                <37,592>
  <EPS-BASIC>                                 <0.01>
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                   -0-


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
  I, Jay S. Wintrob, Chief Executive Officer of AIG SunAmerica Life AssuranceCompany, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AIG SunAmerica LifeAssurance Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.   Date: November 12, 2004     /s/ JAY S. WINTROB  Jay S. Wintrob  Chief Executive Officer
§ 102-36.145 May we obtain excess personal property directly from another Federal agency without GSA approval? Yes, but only under the following situations: ( a ) You may obtain excess personal property that has not yet been reported to GSA, provided the total acquisition cost of the excess property does not exceed $10,000 per line item. You must ensure that a SF 122 is completed for the direct transfer and that an authorized official of your agency signs the SF 122. You must provide a copy of the SF 122 to the appropriate regional GSA office within 10 workdays from the date of the transaction.
( b ) You may obtain excess personal property exceeding the $10,000 per line item limitation, provided you first contact the appropriate regional GSA Personal Property Management office for verbal approval of a prearranged transfer. You must annotate the SF 122 with the name of the GSA approving official and the date of the verbal approval, and provide a copy of the SF 122 to GSA within 10 workdays from the date of transaction.
( c ) You are subject to the requirement to pay reimbursement for the excess personal property under a direct transfer when any of the conditions in § 102-36.75(b) applies.
( d ) You may obtain excess personal property directly from another federal agency without GSA approval when that federal agency has statutory authority to dispose of such excess personal property and you are an eligible recipient.
#### § 102-74.260 What action must the Designated Official initiate when there is advance notice of an emergency?

The Designated Official must initiate appropriate action according to the plan when there is advance notice of an emergency.