alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jack W. Callicutt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Corautus Genetics Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Reserved;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2007



/s/ Jack W. CallicuttJack W. CallicuttSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case Number: 22-20488-CR-MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

MOHAMMAD AHMED KAHN et al.,

Defendants. 

________________________________/

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO BRING 

ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT INTO COURTROOM

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Joe Nathan Hightower’s Motion for 

Permission to Bring Electronic Equipment into the Courtroom (“Motion”). (ECF No. 162). After 

careful consideration, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The Motion, (ECF Nos. 162), is GRANTED.

2. Paralegal, Jeanny Labourdette, and Legal Intern, Brandon Rothstein Brandon 

Rothstein, are permitted to bring their lap-tops, computer equipment, and cell phones

into the courthouse for trial, beginning on July 5, 2023, until trial is completed. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 5th day of July, 2023.

________________________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provide to: 

All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cr-20488-JEM Document 176 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Florida Immigrant Coalition, Inc.,

Americans for Immigrant Justice, Inc., and

Hope CommUnity Center, Inc.,

 

Plaintiffs,

v.

Ronald D. DeSantis, in his official capacity as 

Governor of the State of Florida; and Jared 

W. Perdue, in his official capacity as the 

Secretary of the Florida Department of 

Transportation,

 Defendants.

 Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-23927-KMW

 

 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs Florida 

Immigrant Coalition, Inc., Americans for Immigrant Justice, Inc., and Hope CommUnity Center, 

Inc. hereby voluntarily dismiss this action without prejudice.

Dated: April 19, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Paul R. Chavez George J. Leontire*

Paul R. Chavez Felicia L. Carboni*

Fla. Bar No. 1021395 LEONTIRE & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Southern Poverty Law Center P.O. Box 4328

2 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 3750 Westport, MA 02740

Miami, FL 33131 P: (855) 223-9080

P: (786) 347-2056 F: (508) 207-9747

paul.chavez@splcenter.org george@leontirelaw.com

felicia@leontirelaw.com

Case 1:22-cv-23927-KMW Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/2023 Page 1 of 3
2

Luz Lopez*

Southern Poverty Law Center 

1101 17th Street NW, Suite 705

Washington, D.C. 20036 

P: (404) 387-9314

luz.lopez@splcenter.org

Stephanie M. Alvarez-Jones*

Southern Poverty Law Center

150 E. Ponce De Leon Avenue, Suite 340 

Decatur, GA 30030

P: (470) 747-8265

stephanie.alvarezjones@splcenter.org

Ronald S. Sullivan Jr.*

Director, Criminal Justice Institute

Harvard University

1607 Massachusetts Avenue

Cambridge, MA 02138

P: (617) 496-4777

F: (617) 496-2277

rsullivan@law.harvard.edu

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

*Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Case 1:22-cv-23927-KMW Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/2023 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 19, 2023, the foregoing notice was electronically filed with 

the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all registered 

CM/ECF users. 

By: /s/ Paul R. Chavez

Paul R. Chavez

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 1:22-cv-23927-KMW Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/2023 Page 3 of 3
** **

** Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

                      Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that theCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

| Date: August 9, 2004 | /s/Geoffery E. Merszei                   			GeofferyE. Merszei			Executive Vice President and 			Chief Financial Officer |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **
Argued and submitted July 10,

remanded in part; otherwise affirmed September 6, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of Lynne Marie NUNEZ, *Respondent, and*Charles A. NUNEZ, *Appellant.*

(93C-36114; CA A85731)

902 P2d 115

Gordon L. Dick argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Wheeler & Dick.

Darris K. Rowell argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

RIGGS, P. J.

*315RIGGS, P. J.

Husband appeals from a dissolution judgment, challenging the trial court’s award of child support and the property division. We review *de novo,*ORS 19.125(3), and modify the judgment in part.

Because only one of husband’s assignments of error requires discussion, an extensive recitation of the facts in this case is not necessary. In its property division, the court distributed the long half of the parties’ assets to husband and awarded wife an equalizing judgment of $2,640. Because wife received the liquid assets, there was some concern that husband would not be able to pay the equalizing judgment and his share of the parties’ consumer debt, which amounted to $5,596. To rectify the situation, the court ordered wife to loan husband $8,236 to cover his debt ($2,640 + $5,596) and that amount was entered as a judgment in favor of wife, payable over a 10-year period.1

Husband argues that the trial court erroneously incorporated a mathematical error when it distributed the parties’ assets and liabilities and issued the judgment for wife in the amount of $8,236. Wife concedes that the trial court erred. The parties agree that husband owes wife $1,320 to equalize the property distribution, not $2,640 as the trial court determined. Accordingly, the judgment for wife should be reduced to $6,916. We remand for entry of a modified judgment in the amount of $6,916.

Remanded for entry of modified judgment awarding wife $6,916; otherwise affirmed. No costs to either party.

1

 On these facts, this arrangement represents a novel, but appropriate, resolution to alleviate husband’s immediate financial needs. We reject husband’s claim that the loan fails to disentangle the parties’ finances. The loan is a single transaction between the parties that husband can complete at any time by simply repaying the loan. We do not believe that the arrangement ordered here constitutes excessive entanglement. *See Madden and Madden,*114 Or App 319, 836 P2d 1349 (1992) (excessive entanglement found where husband was to provide annual accounting and pay half of all sums received from corporation to wife). Furthermore, there is no way to distribute the parties’ property in a manner that would be “significantly preferable” to the trial court’s distribution. *Leslie and Leslie,*130 Or App 327, 881 P2d 159 (1994).
#### § 128-1.5002-2 Department.

The Department of Justice, including all its Bureaus and their respective field operations in all locations.
§ 105-68.365 What must I do if I learn of information required under § 105-68.355 after entering into a covered transaction with a higher tier participant? At any time after you enter into a lower tier covered transaction with a person at a higher tier, you must provide immediate written notice to that person if you learn either that— ( a ) You failed to disclose information earlier, as required by § 105-68.355; or
( b ) Due to changed circumstances, you or any of the principals for the transaction now meet any of the criteria in § 105-68.355.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allis-Chalmers
Corporation. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



DATE: AUGUST 16, 2004 BY:                        /S/ MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Munawar H. Hidayatallah
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


DATE: AUGUST 16, 2004 BY:                        /S/ TODD C. SEWARD
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Todd C. Seward
                                                 Chief Accounting Officer
§ 102-33.380 Who must report information to GSA on Government aircraft? You must report information to GSA on Government aircraft if your agency— ( a ) Is an executive agency of the United States Government; and
( b ) Owns, bails, borrows, loans, leases, rents, charters, or contracts for (or obtains by ISSA) Government aircraft.
§ 101-25.107 Guidelines for requisitioning and proper use of consumable or low cost items. Consumable and low value items in inventory (cupboard stocks are not considered inventory) are subject to accounting and inventory record controls in accordance with applicable provisions of law and the principles and standards prescribed by the General Accounting Office, 2 GAO 12.5. Normally, however, the systems of control for such property cease at the time of issuance from a warehouse or storeroom to the consumer. ( a ) The guidelines set forth in this § 101-25.107 are considered minimum to assure proper use of consumable or low cost items by individuals, subsequent to issue from accountable records and termination of formal accountability. Consumable items, for the purpose of this section, are considered to include those items actually consumed in use (e.g., pads and pencils) and those items required in performance of duties but for which, primarily by reason of the low value involved, no formal accountability is maintained after issue, and are generally referred to as “expendable.”
( b ) Approval of requisitions for replenishment of cupboard storeroom stocks should be restricted to officials at a responsible supervisory level to ensure that supply requirements are justified on the basis of essentiality and quantity. Where requisitions are not required, such as in obtaining items from GSA customer supply centers, informal “shopping lists” should be approved at the same level.
( c ) Adequate safeguards and controls should be established to assure that issues of expendable supplies are made for official use only. In appropriate situations, this will include identification of individuals to whom expendable supplies have been issued. Experience has indicated, also, that certain items of expendables should not be displayed either at seasonal periods of the year or on a permanent basis.
( d ) The items listed below have from experience proven to be personally attractive and particularly susceptible to being used for other than official duties. Agencies should give special attention to these and any other consumable or low cost items when issues are excessive when compared with normal program needs.
Attache cases, Ball point pens and refills, Brief cases, Binders, Carbon paper, Dictionaries, Felt tip markers, Felt tip pens and refills, File folders, Letterex, Letter openers, Pads (paper), Paper clips, Pencils, Pencil sharpeners, Portfolios (leather, plastic, and writing pads), Rubber bands, Rulers, Scissors, Spray paint and lacquer, Staplers, Staples, Staple removers, Tape dispensers, Transparent tape, Typewriter ribbons.
[32 FR 4413, Mar. 23, 1967, as amended at 42 FR 1031, Jan. 5, 1977; 51 FR 13498, Apr. 21, 1986]
#### § 102-85.65 How does an OA obligate the customer agency?

An OA obligates the executing customer agency to fund the current-year Rent obligation owed GSA, as well as to reimburse GSA for any other *bona fide* obligations that GSA may have incurred on behalf of the customer agency. Although the OA is an interagency agreement, memorializing the understanding of GSA and its customer agency, the OA may not be construed as obligating future year customer agency funds until they are legally available. A multi-year OA commitment assumes the customer agency will seek the necessary funding through budget and appropriations processes.
#### § 102-118.45 How does a transportation service provider (TSP) bill my agency for transportation and transportation services?

The manner in which your agency orders transportation and transportation services determines the manner in which a TSP bills for service. This is shown in the following table:

| (a) Ordering method | (b) Billing method |
| --- | --- |
| (1)(i) Government issued agency charge card, | (1) Bill from charge card company (may be electronic). |
| (ii) Centrally billed travel account citation. | |
| (2)(i) Purchase order, | (2) Bill from TSP (may be electronic). |
| (ii) Bill of lading, | |
| (iii) Government Bill of Lading, | |
| (iv) Government Transportation Request. | |
| (3)(i) Contractor issued individual travel charge card | (3) Voucher from employee (may be electronic). |
| (ii) Personal charge card, | |
| (iii) Personal cash. | |

Transportation Service Provider Billing
Exhibit 4.1

 

 Exhibit 4.1
 

 AMENDMENT NO. 1
 

 This Amendment No. 1 dated as of January 30, 2017 to the Rights Agreement (“Agreement”) dated as of December 5, 2016 between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”).  
 

 WHEREAS, the Company and the Rights Agent desire to amend the Agreement as set forth below.
 

 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual respective agreements set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
 

 1.
 Amendment of Section 1.1 of the Agreement.  The Agreement is hereby amended by replacing “or” before clause (iv) of the definition of “Acquiring Person” in Section 1.1 with a “,” and inserting the following at the end of such clause (iv): “or (v) any member of the Hale Group, as defined in the Agreement made and entered into as of January 30, 2017 by and among the Company, Steven A. Hale II and the other parties thereto (the “Hale Agreement”), provided that any purchases made by the members of the Hale Group after December 5, 2016 are made in compliance with Section 1(h) of the Hale Agreement.
 

 2.
 No Other Amendments.  Except to the extent amended hereby, all of the terms, provisions and conditions set forth in the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.  The Agreement and this Amendment shall be read and construed together as a single agreement and the term “Agreement” shall henceforth be deemed a reference to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.  
 

 3.
 Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof.
 4.
 Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
 [signature pages follow]
 

  

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the duly authorized signatories of the parties as of the date first written above.
 

 STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
 

 By:  s/Glenn Prillaman                                  
 Name: Glenn Prillaman
 Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
 

 CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER &
 TRUST COMPANY
 

 

 By:  s/Henry Farrell                                      
 Name:  Henry Farrell
 Title:    Vice President
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 751

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

States Courthouse’’.ward N. Cahn Federal Building and UnitedStreet in Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘EdStates courthouse located at 504 West Hamilton
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 751

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 504 West Hamilton Street in Allentown,

Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Edward N. Cahn Federal Building

and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 751 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 located at 504 West Hamilton Street in Allentown, Penn4 sylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Edward

5 N. Cahn Federal Building and United States Court6 house’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

10 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec11 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Edward

12 N. Cahn Federal Building and United States Court13 house’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 23,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

COLLECTIVE ACTION

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER,

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

/

CONSENT TO JOIN PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. §216(b)

1. My name is Richard Johnson II .

2. I consent, agree, and opt to become a Plaintiff in this lawsuit brought under the 

FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., against my current/former employer, 450 North River Drive, LLC, 

d/b/a Kiki on the River, and alleged employers RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones (collectively 

“Defendants”).

3. I wish to assert a claim for alleged unpaid/underpaid tips against Kiki on the River 

and the other Defendants for the tips I allege I’m owed.

4. I agree to be bound by any adjudication of this action by the Court, whether it is 

favorable or unfavorable. I further agree to be bound by any collective action settlement herein 

that is recommended by FairLaw Firm, approved by the Class Representative, and approved by 

the Court as fair and reasonable.

5. I designate the FairLaw Firm to represent me in this case.

Dated Sep 22, 2023 , 2023. Signed:Richard Johnson II (Sep 22, 2023 12:29 EDT)

Printed Name: Richard Johnson II _

Your Address, Email, and Telephone Are Needed, But Will Not Filed With The Court

Address: 11855 NE 19th Drive, suite 22, Miami, FL 33181 Tel No.: 786-267-7296

11855 NE 19th Drive,suite 22, Miami, FL 33181 Email: lineaderopa@gmail.com

MAIL, EMAIL, OR FAX YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO:

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33156 / brian@fairlawattorney.com

TEL 305.230.4884 TEXT 786.386.0885 FAX 305.230.4844 

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 215-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2023 Page 1 of 1
Natoma

Manors

Bay

Heights

Golden Pines

North

Grove

Shorecrest

Bay Point

Miami International Airport

Morningside

Grapeland Heights

Little Havana Dodge Island

Shenandoah

Virginia Key

Auburndale

Liberty City

Silver Bluff

Wynwood

Little River

Downtown

The Roads

Allapattah

Little Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

C

O

C

O

N

U

T

G

R

O

V

E

pU

ep Er sa St edi

r et a wegdE

2

0

2

2

E

n

j

oin

e

d

Pla

n

Districts

12345

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-23 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAHMIR HARRIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 506 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.