alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1 November 7 , 2014 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION



### NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

TO GEORGIA’S STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS AND PARTIES:

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority set forth below, the Environmental Protection Division (hereinafter, “EPD”) of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources proposes Am endments to Georgia’s State Implementation Plan (SIP). The proposed revision is

described below:

The proposed State Implement ation Plan revision includes the addition of the 15

- county Atlanta Nonattainment Area Emissions Inventory for the 2008 8

- Hour Ozone National Ambien t Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) as required by §182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act. Additionally, Georgia

EPD cer tifies that the existing Permit Program and Emissions Statements satisfy the requirements of §182(a)(2)(C) and §182(a)(3)(B), respectively.

This notice is being provided to all persons who have requested in writing that they be placed on

a notification li st. The proposed SIP revision may be viewed at http://www.georgiaair.org/airpermit/html/planningsupport/ie_2008ozone_atl.htm or during normal

business hours of 8: 00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Air Protection Branch, 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120, Atlanta, Georgia 30354. Copies may also be requested by contacting the Air Protection Branch at 404/363

- 7000.

To provide the public an opportunity to comment upon and provide input into the proposed SIP revision, a public hearing will be held at 2 :00 p.m. on December 9 , 201 4 , in the EPD Training Center located at 4244 International Parkway, Suite 116, Atlanta, Georgia 30354. At the hearing, anyone may present data, make a statement, comment or offer a viewpoint or argument either orally or in writing. Lengthy statements or statements of a considerable technical or economic nature, as well as previously recorded messages, mu st be submitted in writing for the official record. Oral statements should be concise.

Written comments are welcomed. To insure their inclusion in EPD's final submission of the SIP revision to EPA, written comments should be received by close of busine ss by December 16

, 201 4

. Written comments may be emailed to EPDComments@dnr.state.ga.us or sent via regular mail addressed to: Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch, 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120, Atlanta, Georgia, 30354.

The proposed SIP revision is proposed pursuant to authority contained in Georgia Air Quality Act (O.C.G.A. Section 12

- 9

- 1 et. seq.). For further information, contact the Air Protection

Branch at 404/363

- 7000.
From: Steckel, Andrew

To: Brad Poiriez ; mguzzett@arb.ca.gov

Cc: Reyes Romero ; Monica Soucier ; Zimpfer, Amy ; Law, Nicole

Subject: EPA Comment on Imperial Rules

Date: Friday, October 18, 2013 1:24:11 PM

Attachments: image001.png



### United States Environmental

Protection Agency

Region IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

October 18, 2013

Transmittal of EPA Rule Review Comments

To: Brad Poiriez, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District

bradpoiriez@co.imperial.ca.us

Mike Guzzetta, California Air Resources Board

mguzzett@arb.ca.gov

From: Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief

steckel.andrew@epa.gov

Re: Rule 400.3 Internal Combustion Engine(s), draft dated September 05, 2013

and Rule 400.4 Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen From Wallboard Kilns,

draft dated March 22, 2013

We are providing comments based on our preliminary review of the draft rules identified above. Please

direct any questions about our comments to me at (415) 947-4115 or to Nicole Law at (415) 947-4126.

Rule 400.3

Please consider lowering the emission limits in Section C. Examples of analogous rules with lower limits

include San Joaquin Valley Rule 4702, Feather River Rule 3.22, and CARB’s “Determination of

Reasonable Available Control Technology and Best Available Retrofit Technology for Stationary SparkIgnited Internal Combustion Engines” ( http://www.arb.ca.gov/ractbarc/rb-iceall.pdf ).

Rule 400.4

Please eliminate or revise the startup and shutdown provisions in Section D.1 consistent with national

policy such as that described in 78 FR 12460 (February 22, 2013). 

### 1

2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-21-00080-CV

Michelle ADAME,

Appellant

v.

Arturo DIAZ,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CV04024

Honorable John Longoria, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 5, 2021

DISMISSED AS MOOT

This is an appeal in a forcible detainer action in which the county court signed a judgment of 

possession in favor of appellee on February 5, 2021. A review of the clerk’s record shows the county 

clerk issued a writ of possession seeking to enforce that judgment on February 10, 2021. 

The only issue in a forcible detainer action is the right to actual possession of the property. See 

TEX. R. CIV. P. 510.3(e); Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of the City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 785 

(Tex. 2006); see also TEX. PROP. CODE §§ 24.001-.002. A judgment of possession in such an action 

determines only the right to immediate possession and is not a final determination of whether an 
04-21-00080-CV

- 2 -

eviction is wrongful. Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 787. When a forcible detainer defendant fails to file a 

supersedeas bond in the amount set by the county court, the judgment may be enforced and a writ of 

possession may be executed, evicting the defendant from the property. See TEX. PROP. CODE § 24.007; 

TEX. R. CIV. P. 510.13; Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 786. If a forcible detainer defendant fails to supersede 

the judgment and loses possession of the property, the appeal is moot unless she (1) timely and clearly 

expressed her intent to appeal and (2) asserted “a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, 

actual possession of the [property].” See Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 786-87. 

The clerk’s record does not indicate appellant filed a supersedeas bond and it is unclear whether 

the writ of possession was executed. On March 9, 2021, we ordered appellant to file a written response 

no later than March 19, 2021 explaining whether the writ of possession was executed and why this 

appeal should not be dismissed as moot. Appellant did not respond. Accordingly, we dismiss this 

appeal as moot.

PER CURIAM
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAOT-12-000064324-JUL-201208:33 AM
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Albertson's, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended May 4, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Lawrence R. Johnston
and Felicia D. Thornton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
          Report.

May 31, 2006


/s/ Lawrence R. Johnston
-------------------------------------
Lawrence R. Johnston
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Felicia D. Thornton
-------------------------------------
Felicia D. Thornton
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 102-118.70 Must my agency make all payments via electronic funds transfer?

Yes, under 31 U.S.C. 3332, *et seq.,* your agency must make all payments for goods and services via EFT (this includes goods and services ordered using charge cards).
EXHIBIT 23.1




                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8  No.  333-1912)  pertaining  to  the  1994  Stock  Option  Plan  of  TresCom
International,  Inc.  of our reports  dated  March 27, 1997 with  respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of TresCom International, Inc. in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of TresCom International,  Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1996.



                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 28, 1997
§ 105-68.145 Does this part address persons who are disqualified, as well as those who are excluded from nonprocurement transactions? Except if provided for in Subpart J of this part, this part— ( a ) Addresses disqualified persons only to— ( 1 ) Provide for their inclusion in the *EPLS;* and
( 2 ) State responsibilities of Federal agencies and participants to check for disqualified persons before entering into covered transactions.
( b ) Does not specify the— ( 1 ) GSA transactions for which a disqualified person is ineligible. Those transactions vary on a case-by-case basis, because they depend on the language of the specific statute, Executive order, or regulation that caused the disqualification;
( 2 ) Entities to which the disqualification applies; or
( 3 ) Process that the agency uses to disqualify a person. Unlike exclusion, disqualification is frequently not a discretionary action that a Federal agency takes.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MICHAEL JOSEPH, 

 Plaintiff,

vs.

SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P. a/k/a 

CAMDEN SUMMIT PARTNERSHIP, L.P. 

and BAIRES BRICKELL, LLC d/b/a BAIRES GRILL,

 Defendant(s).

Case No: 22-cv-23949-RKA

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE

Plaintiff, MICHAEL JOSEPH, and Defendants, SUMMIT PROPERTIES 

PARTNERSHIP, L.P. a/k/a CAMDEN SUMMIT PARTNERSHIP, L.P. and BAIRES 

BRICKELL, LLC d/b/a BAIRES GRILL, by and through their respective undersigned 

counsel, hereby notify the Court that the Parties have reached a settlement in principle. 

The Parties are in the process of memorializing their agreement and finalizing their 

settlement documents.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Glenn R. Goldstein

Glenn R. Goldstein (FBN: 55873)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Glenn R. Goldstein & Assoc., PLLC

8101 Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 504

Miami, Florida 33138

(305) 900-2373

GGoldstein@G2Legal.net

s/ Lauren N. Wassenberg

Lauren N. Wassenberg (FBN: 34083)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Lauren N. Wassenberg & Assoc., P.A.

33 SE 4th St., Ste. 100

Boca Raton, FL 33432

(561) 571-0646

WassenbergL@gmail.com

s/ Stefanie Silverman Copelow

Stefanie S. Copelow, Esq. (FBN: 85403)

Attorney for Defendants, Baires Brickell, LLC

and Summit Properties Partnership, L.P. 

a/k/a Camden Summit Partnership, L.P.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A.

222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 120

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

(561) 681-5532

stefanie.copelow@csklegal.com
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

Harry
Kletter and Alan L. Schroering, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of Industrial Services of America, Inc.,
hereby certify as of this 10th day of November, 2010, that the Form 10-Q for the
Quarter ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Industrial
Services of America, Inc.

| |                                             
| | --------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Harry Kletter                           
| |                                             
| | Harry
 Kletter, Chief Executive Officer     
| |                                             
| | /s/ Alan L. Schroering                      
| |                                             
| | Alan L. Schroering, Chief Financial
 Officer

34

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allis-Chalmers
Corporation. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



DATE:  AUGUST 16, 2005              BY: /S/ MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


DATE:  AUGUST 16, 2005              BY: /S/ VICTOR M. PEREZ
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        VICTOR M. PEREZ
                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
#### § 102-118.340 Do the requirements of a transportation prepayment audit change the disbursing official's liability for overpayment?

No, the disbursing official has a liability for overpayments on all transportation bills subject to prepayment audit (31 U.S.C. 3322).
Argued and submitted May 23,

vacated and remanded in part; otherwise affirmed July 19, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*LaJEANNIA MARIA BURGESS, *Appellant.*

(94CR-0038, 94CR-0103; CA A85171 (Control), A85172)

(Cases Consolidated)

898 P2d 1370

Irene B. Taylor, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*535PER CURIAM

This consolidated appeal involves two indictments that charged defendant with felony driving while revoked (FDWR). Each indictment accused defendant of committing two counts of FDWR. After a trial by stipulated facts, defendant was convicted on all four counts. The trial court entered separate judgments in each case. It merged counts 1 and 2 in each indictment for sentencing. Defendant appeals the convictions that were based on count 2 in each indictment. Those counts were both based on the fact that defendant drove on a public highway during the period in which her driving privileges were revoked by the Circuit Court of Jefferson County.

Defendant argues that, under *State v. Daniels,*320 Or 466, 886 P2d 1019 (1994), at most, she could be found guilty under count 2 in both indictments of committing a class B traffic infraction. The state concedes that defendant is correct. The state argues that it is unnecessary to remand for entry of convictions for the infractions, because each infraction would merge with the corresponding felony conviction. ORS 161.067(1). We agree. Accordingly, we vacate the convictions on count 2 in each case.

Convictions on count 2 in CA A85171 and count 2 in CA A85172 vacated; remanded for entry of corrected judgment; otherwise affirmed.
**Exhibit 8**

 

Subsidiaries

 

The following are the subsidiaries of Triple P N.V., each of which is awholly-owned subsidiary directly or indirectly of the Company:

 
| **Name**                              | ** ** | **Legal Seat**            |   |
|---------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                                  |       |                      |   |
| Active                                |       |                      |   |
|                                  |       |                      |   |
| Triple P Management B.V.              |       | Vianen - The Netherlands  |   |
| Triple P Nederland B.V.               |       | Vianen - The Netherlands  |   |
| Triple P eActivity B.V.               |       | Zeist - The Netherlands   |   |
|                                  |       |                      |   |
| Inactive                              |       |                      |   |
|                                  |       |                      |   |
| Triple P Services / B-Catel B.V.      |       | Vianen - The Netherlands  |   |
| Triple P Healthcare B.V.              |       | Vianen - The Netherlands  |   |
| Telesystems Europe B.V.               |       | Vianen - The Netherlands  |   |
| Triple P Intellectual Properties B.V. |       | Vianen - The Netherlands  |   |
| Triple P Lab Info Systems B.V.        |       | Vianen - The Netherlands  |   |
| F.W. Salomons Holding B.V.            |       | Vianen - The Netherlands  |   |
| Omega N.V./S.A.                       |       | Mechelen – Belgium   |   |
| Mediasystemen B.V.                    |       | Haarlem - The Netherlands |   |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-24143-RAR

JAMES WATSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

PRIMANTI BROS OF FT. LAUDERDALE, INC., 

d/b/a Primanti Bros,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with 

Prejudice [ECF No. 10] (“Notice”), filed on February 6, 2023. The Court having reviewed the 

Notice, the record, and being otherwise fully advised, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each 

party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. The Clerk is instructed to mark this case CLOSED, 

and any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 6th day of February, 2023.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-24143-RAR Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/08/2023 Page 1 of 1
### MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN**  **AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0353** Docket Number

**2008 -**  **SW -**  **029 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Eurocopter Em ergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) No. 53.01.58 and EASB No. 53A012, both Revision 1, and both dated January 4, 2008.

**MA Y BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd. , Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137
**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Geoffery E. Merszei, Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Alcan Inc. ("Alcan"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofAlcan;

2.  Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The registrant'sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)   Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant'sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)   All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)   Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

| Date: August 9, 2004 | /s/Geoffery E. Merszei                   			GeofferyE. Merszei			Executive Vice President and 			Chief Financial Officer |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|