alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         697,557
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 19,158,790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,248,915
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,144,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,102,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      9,699,652
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,516
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,573,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,102,917
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,760,269
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,975,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,985,869
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             372,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                426,049
<INCOME-TAX>                                   191,125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            234,924
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   234,924
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 36 98

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Leo na rd Lun a, on be ha lf o f hi m se lf a nd all ot he rs si m il arl y si tu at ed

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
W al m art Tran sp or ta ti on , LLC, an Ark an sa s C or po rat io n
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

Defe nd an t - Ap pe ll ee

__

__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s - F ay et te vi ll e

__

__ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Aug us t 9 , 20 19 Fi le d: Aug us t 1 4, 2 01 9 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Cir cu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

In th is act io n un de r th e Fai r Cred it Rep o r t i n g A c t , Leo na rd Lun a ap pe al s fo ll owi ng th e di st ric t co ur t’s Fed eral Ru le of Ci vi l Pro ced ur e 12 (b )(6 ) di sm is sa l fo r 1

Th e Hon or ab le Tim ot hy L. Bro ok s, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r t h e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s.fai lu re to st at e a cl ai m

. W e fin d no ba si s fo r rev ers al

. Eve n co ns id eri ng th e

al le g a t i o n s in a de cl arat io n Lun a of fere d in res po ns e to th e m ot io n to di sm is s, we
co nc lu de th at th e co m

pl ai nt wou ld fai l. See Ph ip ps v
. F D I C , 41 7 F.3 d 10 06 , 10 10 (8 th Ci r. 20 05 ) (Ru le 12 (b )(6 ) di sm is sa l m ay be affi rm ed on an y ba si s su pp or te d by

reco rd ); cf. Doe v
. D a r d en el le Sch

. Dis t., 92 8 F.3 d 72 2, 72 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 19 ) (rev ie win g de ni al of le av e to am en d fo r ab us e of di sc ret io n, an d qu es ti on s of fu ti li ty de no vo ). W e al so fin d th at di sc ov ery was pr op erl y st ay ed aft er th e co ur t ru le d fro m th e be nc h th at th e fir st am en de d co m pl ai nt was di sm is se d fo r fai lu re to st at e a cl ai m , an d ad vi se d th e pa rti es a writ te n or de r wou ld be fo rth co m in g. See Fi rs t Co m m erci al Trus t Co ., N.A. v. Co lt ’s Mfg

. Co ., 77 F.3 d 10 81 , 10 83 n.4 (8 th Ci r. 19 96 ) (li ti ga nt s ha ve no rig ht to di sc ov ery ab se nt pl au si bl e le ga l th eo ry ). The jud gm en t is affi rm ed

. See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
PROMISSORY NOTE


$60,000.00

For Value Received, Sharp Technology, Inc. (maker), promises to pay to the order
of  Gilbert  Gertner (Payee), at 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2222, Houston, Texas
77056,  or  such  other  address  as may be designated by the holder hereof, the
principle  sum of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000.00) together with the interest
at  the  rate  of  10%  per  annum.  Payment  shall  be  due  on  Demand.

Whenever  used  herein, the words "maker" and "payee" shall be deemed to include
their  respective  heirs,  personal  representatives,  successors  and  assigns.

The  maker  hereof  and  all parties who at the time may be liable hereon in any
capacity,  jointly  and  severally,  waive  presentment for payment, protest and
notice  of  dishonor  of  this  note.

This  note  is  executed  and  delivered  and  payable in the State of Texas and
construed  in  accordance  with  the  Laws  of  the  State  of  Texas.

Sharp  Technology,  Inc.

/s/  George  Sharp
-----------------------------
George  T.  Sharp,  President
Date:  November  16,  2000


                                     - 78 -
<PAGE>
§ 334.380 Atlantic Ocean south of entrance to Chesapeake Bay off Dam Neck, Virginia; naval firing range. ( a ) *The danger zone.* All of the water within a sector extending seaward a distance of 7,500 yards between radial lines bearing 35° true and 92° true, respectively, from a point on the shore at latitude 36 47′33′′ N, longitude 75 58′23′′ W.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Vessels shall proceed through the area with caution and shall remain therein no longer than necessary for purpose of transit.
( 2 ) When firing is in progress during daylight hours, red flags will be displayed at conspicuous locations on the beach. When firing is in progress during periods of darkness, red flashing lights will be displayed from conspicuous locations which are visible from the water a minimum distance of four (4) nautical miles.
( 3 ) Firing on the ranges will be suspended as long as any vessel is within the danger zone.
( 4 ) Lookout posts shall be manned by the activity or agency operating the firing range at Fleet Combat Center. After darkness, night vision systems will be utilized by lookouts to aid in locating vessels transiting the area.
( 5 ) There shall be no firing on any ranges during the periods of low visibility which would prevent the recognition of a vessel (to a distance of 7,500 yards) which is properly displaying navigational lights, or which would preclude a vessel from observing the red range flags or lights.
( 6 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commanding Officer, Fleet Combat Training Center, Atlantic, Dam Neck, Virginia Beach, Virginia, and other such agencies as he/she may designate.
[58 FR 53428, Oct. 15, 1993]
# ^oT - osr-Do62-il^HL Devany , Denni s (OST) From : Sent : To : Subject : Readerex p @ aol.co m Monday , Apri l 19 , 201 0 9:4 1 P M EA S (OST ) RE : Altoona-Blai rCo . Airpor t W e prefe ran yairlin e selecte d fo rAltoona-Blai rCo . P A airport g o t o Washington-Dulles ; however , ou rmai n criteri a i s tha t an yairlin e selecte d b e a s saf e a s possible . W e ar e no t intereste d i n flight s goin g t o Ohio . John/Sall yJackso n

- 1 1 ••'C D C D
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF OFFICERSOF AML COMMUNICATIONS, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 1350**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code) each of the undersigned officers of AMLCommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

(a)          The annual report on Form 10-KSB/Afor the year ended March 31, 2005 of the Company fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(b)         Information contained insuch Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: July 7, 2005                                                      |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Jacob Inbar                                                               |   |
| Jacob Inbar,                                                                  |
| Chief Executive Officer                                                       |
| /s/ Susan Kelley                                                              |   |
| Susan Kelley,                                                                 |
| Formerly: Susan Fite, Director of Finance &  Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  to  us  in  the
Amendment  to  the Form 10-KSB annual report of ITS Networks, Inc. of our report
dated  December  14,  2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements of
ITS  Networks  Inc., which report is incorporated by reference in this amendment
to  the  annual  report  on Form 10-KSB.


April  17,  2003                            Moore  Stephens,  P.C.

                                           /s/Moore Stephens
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23171-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARBITRADE LTD.;

CRYPTOBONTIX INC.;

TORY R.J. HOGG;

JAMES L. GOLDBERG;

STEPHEN L. BRAVERMAN;

MAX W. BARBER;

SION TRADING FZE,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record. Plaintiff initiated 

this case against Defendant Sion Trading FZE (“Defendant”) on September 30, 2022. ECF No. [1] 

(“Complaint”). A summons was issued as to Defendant that same day. ECF No. [3]. Plaintiff

effectuated service of the summons and Complaint on Defendant on January 17, 2023, setting a 

response deadline of February 7, 2023. ECF No. [41]. When Defendant failed to timely respond 

to the Complaint, the Court entered an Order on Default Procedures, ECF No. [43] (“Order”), 

allowing Defendant additional time to respond and directing Plaintiff to file a motion for clerk’s 

default by February 22, 2023 in the event that Defendant again failed to respond. In the Order, the 

Court also advised Plaintiff that the failure to timely move for clerk’s default as to Defendant may 

result in dismissal without prejudice as to Defendant. See ECF No. [43] at 1-2. To date, Plaintiff

has not filed a motion for entry of clerk’s default as to Defendant in accordance with the Order, 

Case 1:22-cv-23171-BB Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-23171-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

2

nor has Plaintiff sought additional time in which to do so.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The above-styled case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant 

Sion Trading FZE.

2. The case shall proceed as to all remaining Defendants.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on February 23, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23171-BB Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 102-80.95 Is the Fire Administration Authorization Act of 1992 applicable to all Federal agencies?

Yes, the Fire Administration Authorization Act applies to all Federal agencies and all Federally owned and leased buildings in the United States.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

APRIL BOTT MOORE

, Appellant,

v.

ROBERT DEAN MOORE

, Appellee.

No. 4D 2 02 2

- 2780

[ December 7, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nine te enth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River C ounty; Janet C. Croom

, Judge; L.T. Case No.

312022CA000360

.

James S. Toscano and Rebecca E. Rhoden of Lowndes, Drosdick,

Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Robert W. Thielhelm and Cailey M. Marsh of Baker & Hostetler LLP,

Orlando, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel, Comparative Medicine.
    Date: July 25, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 AM to 12:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Gaithersburg Marriott, Washingtonian Center, 9751 
Washingtonina Blvd., Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
    Contact Person: John D. Harding, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research 
Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7965, (301) 435-0810.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 
93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: June 15, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-15756 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 24.8

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director
or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and
each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

                                                      /s/  Jerry P. Widman
                                                      --------------------
                                                      Jerry P. Widman
#### § 102-83.110 Does GSA provide assistance to Federal agencies by consulting and engaging with local officials to establish recommended delineated areas?

Yes. GSA may, at its discretion, assist agencies by consulting and engaging with local officials to establish recommended delineated areas for use in Federal location decisions. These GSA-recommended delineated areas may be proactively developed independent of a specific space requirement. These recommended delineated areas will take into consideration the factors discussed in this part. The final delineated area used in the space acquisition may differ from these recommended areas, depending on the agency mission requirements, CICA and other factors relevant to a specific space action.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001003390
<NAME>                        FIRST SOUTH AFRICA CORP., LTD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                          19,889,111
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                   12,000,224
<ALLOWANCES>                       696,279
<INVENTORY>                      7,219,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                40,185,718
<PP&E>                          16,197,605
<DEPRECIATION>                   4,849,396
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  64,197,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           13,989,695
<BONDS>                         10,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                            54,052
<OTHER-SE>                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    64,197,479
<SALES>                         66,575,931
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                66,575,931
<CGS>                           37,869,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   61,134,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  (468,531)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 858,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  5,052,033
<INCOME-TAX>                     1,572,049
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              3,479,984
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  3,327,478
<CHANGES>                         (124,297)
<NET-INCOME>                     6,683,165
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                         1.22
        


</TABLE>
#### § 102-42.150 What happens to proceeds from sales?

The proceeds from the sale of foreign gifts or decorations must be deposited in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts, unless otherwise authorized.
§ 105-54.204 Advisory committee membership. ( a ) Advisory committees that GSA establishes represent the points of view of the profession, industry, or other group to which it relates, taking into account the size, function, geographical location, affiliation, and other considerations affecting the character of a committee. To ensure balance, the agency considers for membership a cross-section of interested persons and groups with professional or personal qualifications or experience to contribute to the functions and tasks to be performed. This should be construed neither to limit the participation nor to compel the selection of any particular individual or group to obtain different points of view relevant to committee business. The Administrator designates members, alternates, and observers, as appropriate, of advisory committees. He/she designates a Federal officer or employee to chair or attend each meeting of each advisory committee. The Administrator also designates GSA employees to serve on advisory committees sponsored by other Government agencies. The HSSO or Regional Administrator submits nominations and letters of designation for the Administrator's signature to the GSA Committee Management Officer and to the Special Counsel for Ethics and Civil Rights for review and forwarding to the Administrator.
( b ) Discrimination is prohibited on the basis of race, color, age, national origin, religion, sex, or mental and physical handicap in selecting advisory committee members.
( c ) Nominees for membership must submit a Statement of Employment and Financial Interests (provided to the nominee by the HSSO or Regional Administrator) and may not be appointed until cleared by the Designated Agency Ethics Official.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the "Company"),hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Date:9 August 2007                                                                    

                                                                                               /s/ Michael Hanley                                        

                                                                                               Michael Hanley

Executive VicePresident and 

Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7460

WILLIAM JACKSON NEAL, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DALLAS WEAVER; WAYNE MOORE, Superintendent of

Caswell Correctional Center; FRANKLIN FREEMAN,

Secretary of the North Carolina Department of

Correction,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-52-5-BR)

Submitted: September 22, 1998 Decided: October 22, 1998

Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Jackson Neal, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,

III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current

version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to

appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Neal v. Weaver, No. CA-96-52-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 1997).

See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23,

1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process. The motions for remand and for a certificate of appealability are denied.

DISMISSED
Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM   Document 20   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2023   Page 1 of 1