alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 226 (Friday, November 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70090-70091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28097]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8529]

Request for Public Comments on the UN Committee on World Food 
Security Principles for Responsible Agricultural Investment

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State invites the public, including non-
governmental and civil society organizations, think tanks, educational 
institutions, private sector companies, and other interested persons, 
to submit written comments on the draft UN Committee on World Food 
Security (CFS) Principles for Responsible Agricultural Investment. 
Comments received will be shared in full with the CFS for 
consideration.

DATES: All written comments must be received no later than December 22, 
2013.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be emailed to Amy Diggs (DiggsAK@state.gov), 
Office of Agriculture, Biotechnology, and Textile Trade Affairs, Bureau 
of Economic and Business Affairs, U.S. Department of State.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Diggs, telephone (202) 736-4327.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CFS is an intergovernmental platform for 
all

[[Page 70091]]

stakeholders to address food and nutrition security, including the 
production of and physical and economic access to food. In October 
2012, the CFS began a multi-stakeholder process to develop voluntary, 
non-binding international principles for responsible investment in 
agriculture along the entire value chain. The United States is a member 
of the CFS and involved in the negotiation of the principles.
    The draft principles document prepared by the CFS Secretariat is 
available on the CFS Web site (http://www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-home/resaginv/en/ resaginv/en/). We invite comments from the public. Please send them to 
the email address noted in the ADDRESSES section above.

    Dated: November 18, 2013.
Jonathan Shrier,
Acting Special Representative, Office of Global Food Security, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-28097 Filed 11-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
EXHIBIT  32.2


CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO  RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1350,  AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In  connection  with  the  annual  report  of  Sharp  Holding  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, George
Sharp,  Principal  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Sec.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.

Date:  April 14, 2004

/S/  GEORGE  SHARP
------------------
GEORGE  SHARP
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF SHARP HOLDING CORPORATION


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date:    May 10, 2004                                                         | /s/ Travis Engen |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
| Travis Engen                            President and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 32.2



|              |  |          
|------------- |  | ---------
|BESTWAY, INC. |  | FORM 10-Q



Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

of Bestway, Inc.



This certification is provided pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 of Bestway, Inc. (the Issuer).



I, Beth A. Durrett, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my
knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |       |  |                    
|-------------------- |  | ----- |  | -------------------
|Date: April 15, 2005 |  | By:   |  | /s/ Beth A. Durrett
|                     |  | Name: |  | Beth A. Durrett    



Subscribed and sworn to before me

this 15th day of April, 2005.



|                      |  |                  
|--------------------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ Jeanne A. Andress
|Name:                 |  | Jeanne A. Andress
|Title:                |  | Notary Public    



My commission expires: 4/13/2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheet  as of  December  31,  1995  and  the  consolidated
statement  of  earnings  for the three  months  ended  December  31, 1995 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000003327
<NAME>                        ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995

<CASH>                                         129,748
<SECURITIES>                                     6,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,055
<INVENTORY>                                    264,344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               535,017
<PP&E>                                         299,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                 134,597
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 824,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          232,909
<BONDS>                                        184,408
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,526
<OTHER-SE>                                     373,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   824,641
<SALES>                                        347,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               347,638
<CGS>                                          178,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               146,675
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,357
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,518
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,643
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
#### § 102-75.90 How is excess real property needed for office, storage, and related purposes normally transferred to the requesting agency?

GSA may temporarily assign or direct the use of such excess real property to the requesting agency. See § 102-75.240.
Case 9:22-cr-80196-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2022 Page 1 of 8Case 9:22-cr-80196-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2022 Page 2 of 8Case 9:22-cr-80196-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2022 Page 3 of 8Case 9:22-cr-80196-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2022 Page 4 of 8Case 9:22-cr-80196-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2022 Page 5 of 8Case 9:22-cr-80196-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2022 Page 6 of 8Case 9:22-cr-80196-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2022 Page 7 of 8Case 9:22-cr-80196-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2022 Page 8 of 8
Hillsborough

No. 79-418

#### Cameron K. Wehringer v. Mary S. Bullen

June 18, 1980

*Cameron K. Wehringer,*by brief, pro se.

*Hatfield & Henderson,*of Hillsborough, by brief for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

Plaintiff sought specific performance of a contract to purchase land from the defendant. The Trial Court *{Goode,*J.) found that the *447contract price of $30 per acre for land worth $200 per acre was “so grossly inadequate as to shock the conscience of the court,” that the defendant was recently widowed and emotionally weakened at the time of the contract and that she was without legal advice. It was also found that the plaintiff, an attorney, had entered into a very personal relationship with the defendant and had performed legal service for her without charge.

The court denied specific performance, relying upon *Gregoire v. Paradis,*100 N.H. 21, 117 A.2d 328 (1955) for the proposition that specific performance is a discretionary remedy, depending upon the facts of each case, and is not to be decreed as a matter of right. Because the evidence supports the trial court’s findings, they will not be disturbed. *Laconia Clinic, Inc. v. Cullen,*119 N.H. 804, 408 A.2d 412 (1979). The discretionary denial of specific performance was proper. *Gulf Oil Co. v. Rybicki,*102 N.H. 51, 149 A.2d 877 (1959); *see American Home Improvement Co. v. MacIver,*105 N.H. 435, 201 A.2d 886 (1964).

*Affirmed.*
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION 

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Joslyn Klait) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Joslyn Klait.

Dated this 7th day of August 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-118.485 Is there a time limit for my agency to issue a decision on disputed claims?

Yes, your agency must issue a ruling on a disputed claim within 30 days of receipt of the claim.
#### § 3040.174 Postal Service notice and reply.

The Secretary of the Commission shall forward to the Postal Service a copy of the notice of proposal. Within 28 days of the filing of the proposal, the Postal Service shall provide its preliminary views in regard to the proposal. The Postal Service may include suggestions for appropriate further procedural steps.

[72 FR 63698, Nov. 9, 2007. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
#### § 101-5.104-5 Designating agency representatives.

The head of each agency receiving a GSA notice regarding a scheduled feasibility study will be requested to designate one or more officials at the location where the study will be made who may consult with authorized GSA representatives. Such information and assistance as is required or pertinent for an adequate review of the feasibility of the proposed centralized service shall be made available to GSA through the designated agency representatives.
July 6th, 2015

Mr. Scott C. Lane

2825 Soulier Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15227

Dear Mr. Lane:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA−2015−1440) on 

May 11, 2015, but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you 

sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.4 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof; I, John C. Wellons, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ John C. WellonsName:
    John C. WellonsDate: May 11, 2009
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ITIS Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for  the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on August 14, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Hunter M.A.Carr,
Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Hunter M.A. Carr
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003


<PAGE>
#### § 102-75.580 When must HUD notify the disposal agency that an eligible applicant is interested in acquiring the property?

HUD must notify the disposal agency within 30 calendar days after the date of the surplus notice. Then, after the 30-day period expires, HUD has 30 calendar days to review and approve an application and request assignment or inform the disposal agency that no assignment request is forthcoming.
Exhibit


32.2








CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS


ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George R. Lefevre,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Dated:
May 20,
2008                                                                           By:   /s/ George R.
Lefevre


George
R.Lefevre, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis W. Blazer, V.P.  Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Dennis W. Blazer                 
|Dennis W. Blazer                     
|V.P.  Finance and Administration and
|Chief Financial Officer              

Date: August 13, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

NELSON FERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 9:22-cv-81512-AMC

vs.

LITE USA HOLDINGS, INC.

d/b/a LITE STORE USA,

a Florida for-profit corporation,

Defendant.

____________________________/

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ, by and through his undersigned Counsel, and Defendant

LITE USA HOLDINGS, INC. d/b/a LITE STORE USA, by and through its undersigned Counsel, 

hereby provide notice that the parties have reached a settlement and will be executing necessary 

paperwork resolving all claims and matters in the case. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request 

that the Court provide the parties twenty (20) days from the date of filing this Notice to allow the 

parties to finalize the settlement agreement and file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice.

DATED: November 16, 2022.

Respectfully submitted, 

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

4800 N. Hiatus Road Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Sunrise, FL 33351 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595

Case 9:22-cv-81512-AMC Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

SPIRE LAW PLLC

Counsel for Defendant

2572 West State Road 426, Suite 2088

Oveido, FL 32765

(407) 494-0135

alyssa@spirelawfirm.com

jesse@spirelawfirm.com

By /s/ Alyssa Castelli

ALYSSA CASTELLI

Fla. Bar No. 1032306

JESSE I. UNRUH

Fla. Bar No. 93121

Case 9:22-cv-81512-AMC Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2022 Page 2 of 2
Hillsborough

No. 79-108

#### The State of New Hampshire v. Mark A. Holden

June 27, 1979

*Thomas D. Rath,*attorney general *(Anne E. Cagwin,*assistant attorney general, orally), for the State.

*Holland &Aivalikles,*of Nashua *(Francis G. Holland*orally), for the defendant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, a seventeen-year-old juvenile, was certified to the superior court as an adult for charges arising out of a robbery. A four-page order setting forth findings required by RSA 169:21 and *State v. Smagula,*117 N.H. 663, 377 A.2d 608 (1977), was issued by *Pautelas,*J. The superior court remanded the case for an “evidentiary hearing” because there was no verbatim transcript of the district court proceedings accompanying the file. The two courts could not agree whether *Smagula*required a verbatim transcript. At the request of *Harkaway,*P.J., the case was transferred here without ruling by *Cann,*J., to allow us to clarify the “record” requirement of *Smagula.*

*State v. Smagula*requires the superior court to “accept the district court’s waiver decision unless upon *review of the record*it finds the ruling to have been unsupported by the evidence or erroneous as a matter of law.” *Id.*at 667, 377 A.2d at 611 (emphasis added). Because *522this is not a de novo appeal, the “record” is important. The entire juvenile and probation files as well as the detailed *Smagula*findings constitute the “record” before the superior court for review. A verbatim transcript or recording is not required unless the defendant requests a transcript or recording within a reasonable time period before the district court hearing. When such a request is made, the district court must arrange either for a stenographer to be present or a tape recording to be made. Our statute permits the use of recording devices but does not require the use of sophisticated or expensive equipment. RSA 502-A:27-d (Supp. 1977). Any recording equipment provided by attorneys and any recordings made are, of course, subject to the control of the court. A written transcript may be unnecessary because the superior court’s review is limited and will usually require only a portion of the tape record. In this case, the defendant made no request for a verbatim recording or transcript in the district court. The superior court should proceed based upon the “record” before it.

*Remanded.*