alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Federal ADR Programs and Contacts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"X9fFpf6J98\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/fai\/\">Federal ADR Programs and Contacts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/fai\/embed\/#?secret=X9fFpf6J98\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Federal ADR Programs and Contacts” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"X9fFpf6J98\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allis-Chalmers Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Todd C. Seward, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Todd C. Seward
         ---------------------------
         Todd C. Seward
         Principal Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
111-15

fmrX&smxor offBrn

ORIGINAL

Prs\ in-r- nr- «=...r..?="1!=' °' m \j01

BoBSYly^YM EmrfS) apr 27 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

0f 3WBK* Oo^lBfiS ^*TOF CRIMINAL APPEALS

C*u<S£: ^, it-Ms? f:;y oi 20; j

Abel Acosta, Clem

tsfdiM' &t&m&

smssumr

3deof>/ri,fhw3S~W

fiffarL2%Zs>/sr
#### § 105-50.402 Reports submitted to the Office of Management and Budget.

Copies of the foregoing reports will be submitted by the Administrator to the Office of Management and Budget not later than March 30 of each year.
#### § 102-85.25 What is the basic principle governing OAs?

The basic principle governing OAs is to adopt the private sector practice of capturing in a written document the business terms to which GSA and a customer agency agree concerning individual space assignments.
§ 105-68.615 How does the General Services Administration notify a person of a suspension or debarment action? ( a ) The suspending or debarring official sends a written notice to the last known street address, facsimile number, or e-mail address of— ( 1 ) You or your identified counsel; or
( 2 ) Your agent for service of process, or any of your partners, officers, directors, owners, or joint venturers.
( b ) The notice is effective if sent to any of these persons.
#### § 102-71.35 Are agencies allowed to deviate from GSA's real property policies?

Yes, see §§ 102-2.60 through 102-2.110 of this chapter to request a deviation from the requirements of these real property policies.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Reactivity insertion transientand accident limits for high burnup fuel [electronic resource].**
 
InformationNotice 94-64 | Supplement 01
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:56-2/94-64
Item Number:1051-H-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000826144
 
August 27, 2019
§ 102-37.145 Who is responsible for developing, certifying, and submitting the plan? The State legislature must develop the plan. The chief executive officer of the State must submit the plan to the Administrator of General Services for acceptance and certify that the SASP is authorized to: ( a ) Acquire and distribute property to eligible donees in the State;
( b ) Enter into cooperative agreements; and
( c ) Undertake other actions and provide other assurances as are required by 40 U.S.C. 549(e) and set forth in the plan.
[67 FR 2584, Jan. 18, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 23868, Apr. 25, 2006]
EXHIBIT 11.2
DUKE-WEEKS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
EARNINGS TO DEBT SERVICE CALCULATIONS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        DECEMBER 31,
                                            1999
                                        -------------
<S>                                   <C>
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME AVAILABLE
 FOR COMMON UNITS                       $159,447
EARNINGS FROM LAND AND DEPRECIATED
 PROPERTY SALES                          (10,013)
RECURRING PRINCIPAL AMORTIZATION          10,182
INTEREST EXPENSE (EXCLUDES AMORTIZATION
 OF DEFERRED FINANCING FEES)              84,580
                                         -------
   EARNINGS BEFORE DEBT SERVICE          244,196
                                         =======

INTEREST EXPENSE (EXCLUDES AMORTIZATION
 OF DEFERRED FINANCING FEES)              84,580
RECURRING PRINCIPAL AMORTIZATION          10,182
                                         -------
   TOTAL DEBT SERVICE                     94,762
                                         =======

DEBT SERVICE RATIO                          2.58
                                            ====
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

MODEL ME KIDS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MODEL-ME-KIDS, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:22-cv-23871-JEM 

PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED1 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF CLERK’S DEFAULT

Plaintiff Model Me Kids, LLC, by and through its counsel, hereby requests

that the Clerk enter default in this matter against Defendant Model-Me-Kids, Inc. on 

the ground that Defendant has failed to appear or otherwise respond to the 

Complaint within the times prescribed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

On December 8, 2022, Defendant, through its principal, was served with a

copy of the Summons and Complaint in this case. [D.E. 6]. Thereafter, at

Defendant’s principal’s request, Plaintiff permitted Defendant up to and including

January 20, 2023 to respond to the Complaint. See Declaration of James Slater ¶ 5

(“Slater Decl.”) [D.E. 7-1]. On January 20, 2023, Defendant’s principal purported to 

file a motion for extension of time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint. [D.E. 

5]. Because the motion was filed without a lawyer representing Defendant—a 

1 Previously, the Clerk denied this request because Defendant Model-Me-Kids, Inc. had 

filed a motion for extension of time, which the Court has now stricken. [D.E. 8, 9]. 

Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

nonprofit entity—, [D.E. 7-1 ¶ 8], the Court struck the motion and directed the Clerk 

to strike it from the docket. [D.E. 9].

Accordingly, the time allowed for Defendant to respond to the Complaint has 

expired and no further extensions were given by Plaintiff. [D.E. 6; D.E. 7-1 ¶ 6].

Defendant has failed to answer or otherwise defend the Complaint as set forth above.

Defendant is an entity and therefore the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act does not 

apply. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Model Me Kids, LLC requests that a default be 

entered against Defendant Model-Me-Kids, Inc.

Dated: January 23, 2023.

Respectfully submitted,

SLATER LEGAL PLLC

By: James M. Slater

James M. Slater (FBN 111779)

333 S.E. 2nd Ave. #2000

Miami, Florida 33131

james@slater.legal

Tel: (305) 523-9023

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this document was mailed to 

Model-Me-Kids, Inc., c/o Shushona Cooper, 17801 N.W. 2nd Ave #211, Miami 

Gardens, Florida 33169. 

By: James M. Slater

James M. Slater 

Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Biltrite Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Roger S.
Marcus, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Howard N. Feist III, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Roger S. Marcus
------------------------------
Name: Roger S. Marcus
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 12, 2002


/s/ Howard N. Feist III
------------------------------
Name: Howard N. Feist III
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 12, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
STEVE T MALU,

Appellant,

v.

HUDSON & KEYES, LLC,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3011

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 16, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

Steve T Malu, pro se, Appellant.

Kurt E. Ahrendt, Agency for Persons with Disabilities, Crawfordville; Jeffrey R. 

Becker, Jacksonville, for Appellee (no appearances).

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROBERTS, C.J., ROWE and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
##### 



EXHIBIT 6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CanWest Global Communications Corp.
(the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ending August 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Leonard Asper, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ LEONARD ASPERLeonard AsperPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDecember 23, 2003
#### § 102-74.565 What is the scope of this subpart?

In accordance with 40 U.S.C. 589, Federal agencies must comply with the real property policies in this subpart governing the installation, repair and replacement of sidewalks around buildings, installations, properties, or grounds under the control of Executive agencies and owned by the United States.
§ 105-68.845 What does the debarring official consider in deciding whether to debar me? ( a ) The debarring official may debar you for any of the causes in § 105-68.800. However, the official need not debar you even if a cause for debarment exists. The official may consider the seriousness of your acts or omissions and the mitigating or aggravating factors set forth at § 105-68.860.
( b ) The debarring official bases the decision on all information contained in the official record. The record includes— ( 1 ) All information in support of the debarring official's proposed debarment;
( 2 ) Any further information and argument presented in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed debarment; and
( 3 ) Any transcribed record of fact-finding proceedings.
( c ) The debarring official may refer disputed material facts to another official for findings of fact. The debarring official may reject any resultant findings, in whole or in part, only after specifically determining them to be arbitrary, capricious, or clearly erroneous.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 3, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D19-751; 3D19-750; 3D19-744; 3D19-741

Lower Tribunal Nos. 16-551-K; 16-494-K; 16-550-K; 16-549-K

________________

Alfred F. Rehm, et al., 

Appellants,

vs.

Pritam Singh and Ann E. Johnston, et al.,

Appellees.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Luis M. Garcia, 

Judge.

Shannin Law Firm, P.A., Nicholas A. Shannin and Carol B. Shannin 

(Orlando), for appellants.

Smith Hawks, PL, Barton W. Smith and Christopher B. Deem, for 

appellees.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Produced and published at U.S. taxpayer expense

Return on Investment (ROI) 

Education

Office of Research and Evaluation January 2024 

Education Programs Provide a Critical Return 

on Investment. Supporting education is critical to how AmeriCorps ‘gets things done 

for America.’ AmeriCorps offers transformative resources, including 

funding and AmeriCorps members, to address pressing challenges in 

classrooms, schools, and communities through national service. 

AmeriCorps and its partners focused on education help young 

people of different age groups succeed through literacy programs, 

mentorship and leadership support, college preparation, and more. 

AmeriCorps members engage communities and share valuable 

resources to support education across the country, improving 

educational outcomes for underserved people. 

Return on investment (ROI) analyses help quantify a program’s 

benefits relative to its costs, assessing program performance and 

demonstrating value to stakeholders, while building the larger 

evidence base. Calculating ROI for AmeriCorps programs can entail

looking at benefits (relative to costs) experienced by: 

• AmeriCorps members, such as increases in their wages and 

educational attainment. 

• Government, such as increases in tax revenue and

programmatic savings. 

• Society, such as improvements in college completion and 

increases in workforce readiness. 

Education programs prepare students for high school completion, 

college, careers, and full participation in civic life. These programs not 

only demonstrate positive educational outcomes, but they also

generate value from the funding invested in these programs. In terms of ROI:

• Breakthrough Central Texas (Austin) generates a return of $0.03 to $10.22 per funder dollar invested.

• College Possible (College Access Program) generates a return of $1.50 to $6.41 per funder dollar invested.

• Colorado Home Instruction for Parent of Preschool Youngsters generates a return of $0.12 to $6.77 per 

funder dollar invested.

• Minnesota Reading Corps (Kindergarten) generates a return of $5.47 to $6.99 per funder dollar invested.

About the Office of Research and Evaluation

The AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation assists AmeriCorps and its partners in collecting, analyzing, and disseminating 

data and insights about AmeriCorps programs and civic life in America.

About AmeriCorps

AmeriCorps, the federal agency for national service and volunteerism, provides opportunities for Americans to serve their country

domestically, address the nation’s most pressing challenges, improve lives and communities, and strengthen civic engagement. Each 

year, the agency places more than 200,000 AmeriCorps members and AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers in intensive service roles; and 

empowers millions more to serve as long-term, short-term, or one-time volunteers. Learn more at AmeriCorps.gov.
§ 105-71.110 Forms for applying for grants. ( a ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) This section prescribes forms and instructions to be used by governmental organizations (except hospitals and institutions of higher education operated by a government) in applying for grants. This section is not applicable, however, to formula grant programs which do not require applicants to apply for funds on a project basis.
( 2 ) This section applies only to applications to Federal agencies for grants, and is not required to be applied by grantees in dealing with applicants for subgrants. However, grantees are encouraged to avoid more detailed or burdensome application requirements for subgrants.
( b ) *Authorized forms and instructions for governmental organizations.* ( 1 ) In applying for grants, applicants shall only use standard application forms or those prescribed by the granting agency with the approval of OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.
( 2 ) Applicants are not required to submit more than the original and two copies of preapplications or applications.
( 3 ) Applicants must follow all applicable instructions that bear OMB clearance numbers. Federal agencies may specify and describe the programs, functions, or activities that will be used to plan, budget, and evaluate the work under a grant. Other supplementary instructions may be issued only with the approval of OMB to the extent required under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. For any standard form, except the SF-424 facesheet, Federal agencies may shade out or instruct the applicant to disregard any line item that is not needed.
( 4 ) When a grantee applies for additional funding (such as a continuation or supplemental award) or amends a previously submitted application, only the affected pages need be submitted. Previously submitted pages with information that is still current need not be resubmitted.
#### § 963.2 Scope of the rules.

These rules of practice are applicable to cases in which the Prohibitory Order Processing Center Manager (hereinafter, “Manager”) has issued a complaint, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3008(d), alleging violation of a prohibitory order, and in which the alleged violator has petitioned for a hearing in the matter. As provided in 39 U.S.C. 3008(h), subchapter II of chapter 5 (relating to administrative procedure) and chapter 7 (relating to judicial review) of part I of title 5, U.S.C., do not apply to the hearings authorized by 39 U.S.C. 3008(d).

[52 FR 18912, May 20, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 10751, Mar. 8, 1994, 62 FR 4459, Jan. 30, 1997]
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2000 P
#### § 102-75.15 What real property disposal services must agencies provide under a delegation of authority from GSA?

Disposal agencies must provide real property disposal services for real property assets under their custody and control, such as the utilization of excess property, surveys, and the disposal of surplus property, which includes public benefit conveyances, negotiated sales, public sales, related disposal services, and appraisals.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5520 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5520

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility located in 
   Iron Mountain, Michigan, as the ``Oscar G. Johnson Department of 
                  Veterans Affairs Medical Facility''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 2000

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility located in 
   Iron Mountain, Michigan, as the ``Oscar G. Johnson Department of 
                  Veterans Affairs Medical Facility''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL FACILITY, 
              IRON MOUNTAIN, MICHIGAN.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility located in Iron 
Mountain, Michigan, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act 
be known and designated as the ``Oscar G. Johnson Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Facility''. Any reference to such medical 
facility in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper 
of the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the Oscar 
G. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility.
                                 <all>
```