alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                           4,391
<SECURITIES>                                    35,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,247
<PP&E>                                         111,617
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,192
<BONDS>                                        107,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,469
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,684
<SALES>                                        311,343
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               314,465
<CGS>                                          214,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  214,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,712
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
        

</TABLE>
§ 105-68.120 May we grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction? ( a ) The Administrator of General Services may grant an exception permitting an excluded person to participate in a particular covered transaction. If the Administrator of General Services grants an exception, the exception must be in writing and state the reason(s) for deviating from the governmentwide policy in Executive Order 12549.
( b ) An exception granted by one agency for an excluded person does not extend to the covered transactions of another agency.
#### § 105-53.140 Office of Operations and Industry Relations.

The Office of Operations and Industry Relations, headed by the Associate Administrator for Operations and Industry Relations, is responsible for formulating GSA-wide policy that relates to regional operations, supervising GSA's Regional Administrators, and planning and coordinating GSA business and industry relations and customer liaison activities.

[54 FR 26742, June 26, 1989]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                             218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,582
<ALLOWANCES>                                       215
<INVENTORY>                                     10,468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,985
<PP&E>                                          39,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,009
<BONDS>                                          7,830
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,216
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,380)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,747
<SALES>                                         19,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,271
<CGS>                                           13,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,570
<INCOME-TAX>                                       628
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                942
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       942
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18


</TABLE>
#### § 102-75.215 Who must endorse requests for exception to the 100 percent reimbursement requirement?

Agency heads must endorse requests for exceptions to the 100 percent reimbursement requirement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001003936
<NAME> PITTSBURGH FINANCIAL CORP.
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,625,542
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,482,745
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 99,175,745
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    309,665,961
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,237,554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             438,419,016
<DEPOSITS>                                 205,680,077
<SHORT-TERM>                                35,401,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,426,568
<LONG-TERM>                                160,815,730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,821
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,419,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             438,419,016
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             23,342,660
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            7,471,343
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               160,985
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            30,974,988
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,320,181
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          22,446,358
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,528,630
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  600,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           (171,539)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,399,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,649,911
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,166,911
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.48
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,896,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,896,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,956,744
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  323,030
<RECOVERIES>                                     3,840
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,237,554
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-112239, 333-115077, 333-117946, 333-126893, and 333-131000 and Form S-8 Nos. 333-36020, 333-108314, 333-117945, and 333-134383) of Corautus Genetics Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Corautus Genetics Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 27, 2007
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      October 26, 2009 | /s/      Dirk L. Benschop                                                                                                          |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Dirk      L. Benschop, Director, Chief Executive Officer, and    President                                                         |
|                        |                                                                                                                               |
| Date:      October 26, 2009 | /s/      Alfonso de Borbón                                                                                                    |
|                        | Alfonso      de Borbon, Vice President of Corporate Development, Chief      FinancialOfficer,      and principal accountingofficer |

----
§ 105-70.030 The hearing and burden of proof. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a hearing on the record in order to determine whether the defendant is liable for a civil penalty or assessment under § 105-70.003 and, if so, the appropriate amount of any such civil penalty or assessment considering any aggravating or mitigating factors.
( b ) The authority shall prove defendant's liability and any aggravating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) The defendant shall prove any affirmative defenses and any mitigating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( d ) The hearing shall be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown.
#### § 101-29.207 Qualified products list (QPL).

A *qualified products list* is a list of products that have met the qualification requirements stated in the applicable specification, including appropriate product identification and test or qualification reference number, with the name and plant address of the manufacturer and distributor, as applicable. Documents that contain QPL requirements are listed in the GSA “Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions.”
##### 








---



##### 



Supplemental Agreement New Guarantor Guarantor Guarantors Company
 Indenture Trustee Notes Original Agreements, Agreement
      ARTICLE 1
 Definitions.
 1




---



##### 



ARTICLE 2
 Guarantees.
        2




---



##### 



Limitation on Guarantor Liability.
  Execution and Delivery of Note Guarantee.
      3




---



##### 



Guarantors May Consolidate, etc., on Certain Terms.
        4




---



##### 



Releases.
        Withholding Taxes.
 Relevant Jurisdiction Additional Amounts
 5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



ARTICLE 3
 Notices.
      No Personal Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees and Stockholders.
  Governing Law.
  7




---



##### 



No Adverse Interpretation of Other Agreements.
  Successors.
  JURISDICTION.
  Waiver of Immunity.
  Process Agent.
 Process Agent
 8




---



##### 



Severability.
  Currency Indemnity.
   Currency Calculation.
  Counterpart Originals.
  9




---



##### 



Headings, etc.
   10




---



##### 



NEW GUARANTOR:STATS CHIPPAC (THAILAND) LIMITEDBy
    /s/ Tan Lay KoonName:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    Director OTHER GUARANTORS:STATS CHIPPAC, INC.By
    /s/ Tan Lay KoonName:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer STATS CHIPPAC TEST SERVICES, INC.By
    /s/ Tan Lay KoonName:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    Director STATS HOLDINGS LIMITEDBy
    /s/ Tan Lay KoonName:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    Authorized Signatory STATS CHIPPAC (BARBADOS) LTD.By
    /s/ Tan Lay KoonName:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    Authorized Signatory




---



##### 



STATS CHIPPAC (BVI) LIMITEDBy
    /s/ Tan Lay KoonName:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    Authorized Signatory STATS CHIPPAC MALAYSIA SDN. BHD.By
    /s/ Tan Lay KoonName:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    Director CHIPPAC INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITEDBy
    /s/ Tan Lay KoonName:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    Authorized Signatory CHIPPAC LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L.By
    /s/ Tan Lay KoonName:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    Authorized Signatory CHIPPAC LIQUIDITY
MANAGEMENTHUNGARY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANYBy
    /s/ Tan Lay KoonName:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    Authorized Signatory STATS CHIPPAC TAIWAN CO., LTD.By:Name:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    Director




---



##### 



TRUSTEE:U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy
    /s/ Raymond S. HaverstockName:
    Raymond S. HaverstockTitle:
    Vice President COMPANY:STATS CHIPPAC LTD.By
    /s/ Tan Lay KoonName:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



Original Agreements Supplemental Agreement, Agreement Company Trustee
  STATS CHIPPAC (THAILAND) LIMITED.By:Name:
    Tan Lay KoonTitle:
    Director A-1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00586-CV

In re Naima Ham

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis 

Filed: October 20, 2023
§ 102-33.60 What methods may we use to acquire Government aircraft? Following the requirements of §§ 102-33.50 and 102-33.55, you (or an internal bureau or sub-agency within your agency) may acquire Government aircraft by means including, but not limited to— ( a ) Purchase;
( b ) Borrowing from a non-Federal source;
( c ) Bailment from another executive agency;
( d ) Exchange/sale;
( e ) Reimbursable transfer from another executive agency (see §§ 102-36.75 and 102-36.80);
( f ) Transfer from another executive agency as approved by GSA;
( g ) Reassignment from one internal bureau or subagency to another within your agency;
( h ) Transfer of previously forfeited aircraft;
( i ) Insurance replacement (*i.e.,* receiving a replacement aircraft);
( j ) Capital lease;
( k ) Rent or charter;
( l ) Contract for full services (*i.e.,* aircraft plus crew and related aviation services) from a commercial source; or
( m ) Inter-service support agreements with other executive agencies for aircraft and services.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15746]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closing Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 10-11, 2000.
    Time: 7:30 PM to 6 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Katherine Woodbury, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 31, 2000.
    Time: 2 PM to 3:30 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Lillian M. Pubols, Chief, Scientific Review 
Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd, 
Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f130f4d471a3f11161751181009"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b776b29237e5b757273357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 15, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-15746 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Hillsborough

No. 79-008

#### Armand Engineering Company, Inc. v. Adrien A. Labrie, Inc.

May 23, 1979

*Craig, Werners, Craig & McDowell,*of Manchester *(Thomas E. Craig*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Spaloss & Rosson,*of Nashua *(Jon Groetzinger, Jr.,*orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

This is an appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, Armand Engineering Company, Inc., pursuant to RSA 491:8 (a) (Supp. *1977). Flynn,*J., reserved and transferred all questions of law raised by the defendant’s exceptions.

A contract dispute, which arose between the parties, was, by agreement, submitted to arbitration in Boston, Massachusetts. A complaint to confirm an arbitration award in favor of the plaintiff was filed in the Superior Court for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. That court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and on July 30,1976, entered a judgment confirming the award. The defendant did not appeal this order.

Plaintiff subsequently brought suit in New Hampshire on the foreign judgment. Both parties filed numerous motions and pleadings. On May 3,1978, the court held that the Massachusetts judgment was entitled to full faith and credit, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and denied all relief sought by the defendant.

The defendant voluntarily appeared before the Massachusetts court, did not prosecute an appeal from the adverse ruling of that court, and for more than one year did not pursue before that court any of the *409challenges it now urges upon our superior court. We affirm the trial court’s action. *See Leighton v. Davis,*119 N.H. 115, 398 A.2d 845 (1979).

*Exceptions overruled.*
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 6 -00169 -CV Aus ti n Inde pe nde ntSc hoo l D ist r ic t, App e lla nt

v. Christina Bell L owery, Appellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 261S T JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN50138 7, HO NORAB LE GISELA D. TRIANA , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

C O N C U R

R I N G O P I N I O N Ic on c ur in the Court ’s jud g me nt, but I wo uld a ff ir m th e dis tr ic t c ourt ’s or de r s ole ly on the ba sis that, a s matte r o f s tatut or y c on str uc tio n, L ow e ry ’s pa

rt ic ula r c la im h e re do e s n ot f

a ll wi thi n th e e xha

us tio n- of -r e me die s r e qu ir e me nt u

nd e r t he e du c atio n c od e . AI SD do e s n ot e xpla in ho w L ow e ry ’s c la im fa lls wi thi n the e du c atio n c od e ’s c ur re nt e xha us tio n re qu ir e me nt. No r d oe s it point to any

other statutory basis for requiring L ower y to exhaust whatever a dminist rative r emedies AI SD provides under its poli cies or r ules in addition to ex hausting her r emedies unde r the TCHRA. We need g o no further

in overrulingAI SD’s first issue. The majority , in my view, swe eps unnec essar ily broadly in sugg esting that a school e mpl oye e ’s TCH RAc la im c ou ld ne ve r be su bje c t to the e du c atio n co de ’s e xha us tio n r e qu ir e me nts2

and how, in such a

n instance, those statutory scheme s should be rec onciled. Iotherwise join in the majority ’s opinion affir ming the district c ourt’s orde r.

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices B .A. Smith, P ember ton and Waldrop Filed: Nove mber 30, 2006
#### § 102-81.20 Who must comply with this part?

Each agency occupying a Federal facility or Federal grounds under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of GSA, including those facilities and grounds that have been delegated by the Administrator of General Services, for nonmilitary activities must comply with this part, except where the Director of National Intelligence determines that compliance would jeopardize intelligence sources and methods or the Secretary of Energy determines that compliance would conflict with the authorities of the Secretary of Energy over Restricted Data and Special Nuclear Material under, among others, sections 141, 145, 146, 147, and 161 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Department of Energy Organization Act, or any other statute. In situations where a Federal facility is occupied by multiple Federal agencies for both military and nonmilitary activities, and each such occupancy is substantial, those occupants will coordinate on the physical security of the facility.