alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 122 (Friday, June 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39141-39142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15885]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2232-393]


Duke Energy Corporation; Notice of Availability of Draft 
Environmental Assessment

June 19, 2000.
    A draft environmental assessment (DEA) is available for public 
review. The DEA analyzes the environmental impacts of proposed 
revisions to the shoreline classification maps for the Catawba-Wateree 
Project Shoreline Management Plan (SMP). The licensee for the project 
is Duke Energy Corporation (Duke). The maps address the allowable uses 
of 1,635 miles of shoreline for the 11 project reservoirs located in 
North and South Carolina. The maps are supported by results of Duke's 
Shallow Water Fish Habitat Study (SWFHS). Also, addressed in this DEA 
is the Shoreline Stabilization Technique Selection Process (SSTSP). The 
proposed revisions to the shoreline classification maps are an integral 
part of the SMP for the project.
    On the basis of this independent environmental assessment, approval 
of the revised reclassification maps would not constitute a major 
federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human 
environment.
    The DEA was written by Commission staff in the Office of Energy 
Projects, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the DEA can 
be viewed on the web at www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm. Call (202) 
208-2222 for assistance. Copies are also available for inspection and 
reproduction at the

[[Page 39142]]

Commission's Public Reference Room located at 888 First Street, NE, 
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371.
    Anyone may file comments on the DEA. The public, federal and state 
resource agencies are encouraged to provide comments. All comments must 
be filed within 30 days of the date of this notice shown above. Send an 
original and eight copies of all comments marked with the project 
number P-2232-393 to : The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. If you have 
any questions regarding this notice, please call Brian Romanek at (202) 
219-3076.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15885 Filed 6-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 109-28.5103 Management policy. ( a ) Procedures shall require the maintenance of records for spare equipment/property, cross-referenced to the location in the facility and the engineering drawing number. The purpose for retention shall be in the records.
( b ) Reviews shall be made based on technical evaluations of the continued need for the equipment. The reviews should be held biennially. In addition, individual item levels shall be reviewed when spare equipment/Property is installed for use, the basic equipment is removed from service, or the process supported is changed.
( c ) Procedures shall be established to provide for the identification and reporting of unneeded spare equipment/property as excess property.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6599

THOMAS FRANCIS NYLAND, a/k/a Thomas Nyland,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE; CHARLES M. CONDON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-96-3721-3-23BC)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Francis Nyland, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Francis Nyland seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Nyland v. Moore, No. CA-96-3721-3-23BC

(D.S.C. Mar. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Periodically, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) publishes abstracts of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of the clearance requests submitted to OMB for review, call the HRSA Reports Clearance Office on (301) 443-1129. 

The following request has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995: 

## Proposed Project: Assessment of the Impact of the National Practitioner Data Bank—NEW 

                    Under the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Bureau of Health Professions (BHPr), the Division of Quality Assurance (DQA) is planning to conduct a survey to obtain information on the degree of user satisfaction with the National Practitioner Data Bank's (NPDB) querying and reporting processes, how users believe these processes can be improved, and how users perceive the usefulness of information they obtained from the NPDB for licensing and credentialing of health care entities,                     *e.g.*                     managed care organizations, State licensing boards for physicians and dentists, and professional societies. The study will also identify and survey non user entities. The information obtained in this study will be interpreted in relation to similar information from previous studies conducted by the DQA and the Office of the Inspector General.                 

### The estimated response burden is as follows: 

Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to: Wendy A. Taylor, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503. 

Dated: January 14, 2000. 

James J. Corrigan, 

Associate Administrator for Management and Program Support. 

[FR Doc. 00-1533 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-15-U
chd-ex101_138.htm



 

EXHIBIT 10.1

 

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED OMNIBUS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

 

This First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Amended and Restated Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted effective July 30, 2019. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined will have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.

 

WHEREAS, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Plan; 

 

WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 17(a) of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend the Plan;  

 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan as set forth in this Amendment; and

 

WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 17(b) of the Plan, the Board has determined that stockholder approval to amend the Plan as set forth in this Amendment is not required. 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

 


	
 
	
1.
	
Section 15(a) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




“(a) Treatment of Grants upon a Change of Control.  Unless the Board determines otherwise before a Change of Control, effective upon the date of a Change of Control, (i) all outstanding Options and SARs shall automatically accelerate and become fully exercisable, (ii) the restrictions and conditions on all outstanding Stock Awards shall immediately lapse, and (iii) all Stock Units, Other Stock-Based Awards and Dividend Equivalents shall become fully vested and shall be paid at their target values, or in such greater amounts as the Board may determine, unless, in each case, such Grant is (A) made on or after July 30, 2019, to a Participant who, as of the date of such Grant, is an Employee with the title of Executive Vice President or Chief Executive Officer, and (B) assumed, substituted or converted to similar grants of the surviving corporation (or parent or subsidiary of the surviving corporation), in each case with value and terms that are at least equivalent to the Option in effect before the Change of Control and otherwise in accordance with Section 15(b)(iv) of the Plan; provided, however, that, if the Participants’ employment or service with the applicable Employer is terminated by the Employer without “Cause” or by the Participant for “Good Reason” (in each case, as defined in the Participant’s applicable Grant Agreement), in either case upon or within twenty-four (24) months following the Change of Control then, upon any such termination of employment or service, any Grant so converted shall be treated as provided in this Section 15(a)(i), (ii), or (iii), as applicable.”


	
 
	
2.
	
Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




 




	
 
	
3.
	
The validity, construction, interpretation and effect of this Amendment shall be governed and construed by and determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the conflict of laws provisions thereof.




 

 

2
#### §§ 301-10.107-301-10.109 [Reserved]
§ 105-68.220 Are any procurement contracts included as covered transactions? ( a ) Covered transactions under this part— ( 1 ) Do not include any procurement contracts awarded directly by a Federal agency; but
( 2 ) Do include some procurement contracts awarded by non-Federal participants in nonprocurement covered transactions (see appendix to this part).
( b ) Specifically, a contract for goods or services is a covered transaction if any of the following applies: ( 1 ) The contract is awarded by a participant in a nonprocurement transaction that is covered under § 105-68.210, and the amount of the contract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000.
( 2 ) The contract requires the consent of a(n) GSA official. In that case, the contract, regardless of the amount, always is a covered transaction, and it does not matter who awarded it. For example, it could be a subcontract awarded by a contractor at a tier below a nonprocurement transaction, as shown in the appendix to this part.
( 3 ) The contract is for federally-required audit services.
#### § 105-68.985 Person.

*Person* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government, or legal entity, however organized.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSPAR improved structural-fluid dynamic analysis capabilityThe results of a study whose objective was to improve the operation of the SPAR computer code by improving efficiency, user features, and documentation is presented. Additional capability was added to the SPAR arithmetic utility system, including trigonometric functions, numerical integration, interpolation, and matrix combinations. Improvements were made in the EIG processor. A processor was created to compute and store principal stresses in table-format data sets. An additional capability was developed and incorporated into the plot processor which permits plotting directly from table-format data sets. Documentation of all these features is provided in the form of updates to the SPAR users manual.Document ID19850023136Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsPearson, M. L.*(Softcom Systems, Inc. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 17, 1985Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-171549NAS 1.26:171549SOFTCOM-TR-8403-13Accession Number85N31449Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-35772Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850023136.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allis-Chalmers
Corporation. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.

DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2004 BY:         /S/ MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                                    ---------------------------
                                    MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                                    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2004 BY:         /S/ TODD C. SEWARD
                                    ----------------------------
                                    TODD C. SEWARD
                                    CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
INSTRUCTIONS: Please type or print in ink. Please read carefully the attached instructions and supply the information requested on this form. Use additional sheet(s) if necessary.

1. Company Name and Address4. EPA ProductRegistration

United States Environmental Protection

Agency Washington, D.C. 20460

DATA CALL-IN RESPONSE

3. Date and Type of DCI 

GENERIC07-Apr-2010ID # GDCI-10080

2. Case # and Name

3028 Bioban P-1487 (*)Chemical # and Name 100802

Morpholine, 4,4'-(2-ethyl-2-nitro-1,3-propanediyl)bis5. I wish to 

cancel this product registration voluntarily

6. Generic Data 7. Product Specific Data

7a. My product is an MUP andI agree to satisfy the MUP requirements on the attached form entitled "Requirements Status and Registrant's Response."

6a. I am claiming a GenericData Exemption because I obtain the active ingredient from the source EPA registration number listed below.

6b. I agree to satisfy Generic Data requirements as indicated on the attached form entitled "Requirements Status and Registrant's Response."

N.A. 

10. Name of Company 11. Phone Numb

9. Date 8. Certification I certify that the statements made on this form and all attachments are true, accurate, and complete. I acknowledge that any knowingly false or misleading statement may be punishable by fine, imprisonment or both under applicable law.

Signature and Title of Company's Authorized Representative__________________________________
Morpholine, 4,4'-(2-ethyl-2-nitro-1,3-propanediyl)bisINSTRUCTIONS: Please type or print in ink. Please read carefully the attached instructions and supply the information requested on this form. Use additional sheet(s) if necessary.

4. Guideline Requirement Number

5. Study Title

1. Company Name and Address

United States Environmental Protection

Agency Washington, D.C. 20460

REQUIREMENTS STATUS AND REGISTRANT'S RESPONSE

3. Date and Type of DC

ID #GENERIC07-Apr-2010

GDCI-10080

2. Case # and Name

3028 Bioban P-1487 (*)

Chemical # and Name 100802

7. Test Substance

6. Use Pattern

P

R

O

T

O

C

O

L

Progress

Reports

1 2 3

870.4300 Combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity X, Z 

12. Name of Company 13. Phone NumbSignature and Title of Company's Authorized Representative__________________________________10. Certification I certify that the statements made on this form and all attachments are true, accurate, and complete. I acknowledge that any knowingly false or misleading statement may be punishable by fine, imprisonment or both under applicable law

11. Date
United States Environmental Protection

Agency Washington, D.C. 20460

LIST OF ALL REGISTRANTS SENT THIS DATA CALL-IN NOTICE

Co. Nr. Company Name Agent For Address City & S

Case # and Name: 3028,Bioban P-1487 (*)

464 DOW CHEMICAL CO., THE THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY 1500 EAST LAKE COOK ROAD BUFFAL
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-827]


Static Random Access Memory Semiconductors From Taiwan: Notice of 
Extension of Time Limits for Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce is extending the time limits of the 
preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review on 
static random access memory semiconductors from Taiwan. The review 
covers five producers/exporters of the subject merchandise to the 
United States. The period of review is April 1, 1999, through March 31, 
2000.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  June 22, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shawn Thompson at (202) 482-1776 or 
Irina Itkin at (202) 482-0656, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because it is not practicable to complete 
this administrative review within the time limits mandated by section 
751(a)(3)(A) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round 
Agreements Act, the Department is extending the time limit for 
completion of the preliminary results until April 30, 2001.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(3))A)) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).

    Dated: June 16, 2000.
Richard W. Moreland,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-15843 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
Exhibit 31.3








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Sean M. Healey, certify that:





|   |                                                                                          
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







Date: March 29, 2018





/s/ SEAN M. HEALEYSean M. HealeyChief Executive Officer and Chairman
Grafton

No. 78-268

#### Robert O. Tillinghast v. Jeffrey G. Spencer

February 28, 1979

*Paul A. Gruber,*of Lisbon, by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

*Jeffrey G. Spencer,*of Littleton, pro se.

Memorandum Opinion

Plaintiff entered into a written agreement on April 12,1976, to lease certain real property from the defendant with an option to buy. When defendant refused to convey upon the exercise of the option, plaintiff, in December 1976, filed a bill in equity seeking specific performance. After a trial at which defendant was represented by counsel, the court found that the agreement was a fair one, that the defendant’s testimony regarding the value of the property was not believable,, and-that plaintiff had complied with all his obligations under the contract. The Court *(Johnson,*J.) decreed specific performance and transferred defendant’s exceptions.

 It no longer requires citation for the proposition that this court will not upset the findings of tlie trial court if they could reasonably be made on the evidence, even if this court might have come to a different conclusion. The evidence in this case supports thef indings of the trial court and the facts as found warrant the relief decreed.

*Exceptions overruled.*
#### § 102-85.130 How are exemptions from Rent granted?

Exemptions from Rent are rare. However, the Administrator of General Services may exempt any GSA customer from Rent after a determination that application of Rent would not be feasible or practical. Customer agency requests for exemptions must be addressed to the Administrator of General Services and submitted in accordance with GSA Order PBS 4210.1, “Rent Exemption Procedures,” dated December 20, 1991, or in accordance with any superseding GSA order. A copy of the order may be obtained from the Office of Portfolio Management, General Services Administration, 1800 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20405.
3680 Thomas Ave.

Miami, FL 33133

Christopher Hudson

Board Secretary

863 NE 79th St.

Miami, FL 33138

Rebecca Pelham

Executive Director

South Dade Branch

P.O. Box 971515

Miami, FL 33197

Harold Ford

President

Miami-Dade Branch

P.O. Box 315

Opa-Locka, FL 33054

Daniella Pierre

President

June 17, 2023

Mayor Francis X. Suarez

Miami City Hall

3500 Pan American Drive

Miami, FL 33133

Copies to: Chief of Staff Wolfe, Clerk Hannon, Attorney Méndez

Re: Veto of City Commission’s Proposed “Remedial” Map

Dear Mayor Suarez,

On Wednesday, at the end of a rushed meeting that was noticed for 

discussion only, the City Commission passed a proposed “remedial” map for 

its districts. We urge you to veto it.

After finding we are substantially likely to win our case challenging last 

year’s Commission map as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, the federal 

district court gave the City an opportunity to pass a new, fair map. Rather than 

taking the opportunity the Court gave it, the Commission squandered it. This 

new map does nothing to cure the constitutional violations the Court identified.

We emphatically urge you to veto the Commission’s unconstitutional map.

We invite you to meet with us if you would like to discuss further.

Sincerely,

Christopher Hudson Rebecca Pelham

Secretary, GRACE Executive Director, Engage Miami

gracegrove@gmail.com rebecca@engage.miami

(786) 337-1703 (802) 522-4266

Harold Ford Daniella Pierre

President, South Dade NAACP President, Miami-Dade NAACP

president@southdadenaacp.org presidentofmiamidadenaacp@gmail.com

(786) 253-9400 (877) NAACP-09

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 172-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 1