alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 105-72.104 Subawards.

Unless sections of this regulation specifically exclude subrecipients from coverage, the provisions of this regulation shall be applied to subrecipients performing work under awards if such subrecipients are institutions of higher education, hospitals or other non-profit organizations. State and local government subrecipients are subject to the provisions of regulations implementing the grants management common rule, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments,” 41 CFR 105-71.
#### § 101-30.701-1 Item reduction study.

*Item reduction study* means the study of a group of generally similar items which are subject to evaluation by physical and performance characteristics. This evaluation process identifies items determined to be unnecessarily similar or uneconomical for Government use and which will be considered for removal from Government supply systems. For items so identified, a replacement item shall be proposed. The result of item reduction studies will indicate items which are authorized for procurement or not authorized for procurement.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81964-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart

INTREPID OCEANS MARINE, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

JMS NAVAL ARCHITECTS, LLC,

Defendant.

__________________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF No. 22]

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (the “Report”) [ECF No. 22], issued on 

February 10, 2023. On January 12, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand (the “Motion”) 

[ECF No. 10]. On February 10, 2023, following referral, Judge Reinhart issued a Report 

recommending that the Motion be denied [ECF No. 22 p. 3]. On February 24, 2023, Plaintiff 

timely filed an objection to the report [ECF No. 24]. Defendant subsequently responded to

Plaintiff’s objection [ECF No. 26]. The Report is ripe for adjudication. 

To challenge the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge, a party must file 

specific written objections identifying the portions of the proposed findings and recommendation 

to which objection is made. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Heath v. Jones, 863 F.2d 815, 822 

(11th Cir. 1989); Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). A district court 

reviews de novo those portions of the report to which objection is made and may accept, reject, 

or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To the extent a party fails to object to parts of the magistrate judge’s report, 

Case 9:22-cv-81964-AMC Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-81964-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart

2

the Court may accept the recommendation so long as there is no clear error on the face of the 

record. Macort, 208 F. App’x at 784. Legal conclusions are reviewed de novo, even in the absence 

of an objection. See LeCroy v. McNeil, 397 F. App’x 554, 556 (11th Cir. 2010); Cooper-Houston 

v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

Following de novo review of the Report, Plaintiff’s Objection, and Defendant’s Response, 

the Court finds the Report to be well reasoned and correct. For the reasons set forth in the Report 

[ECF No. 22], it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 22] is ACCEPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [ECF No. 10] is DENIED.

3. Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 24] are 

DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 22nd day of March

2023.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81964-AMC Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 105-62.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes procedures for safeguarding national security information and material within GSA. They explain how to identify, classify, downgrade, declassify, disseminate, and protect such information in the interests of national security. They also supplement and conform with Executive Order 12065 dated June 28, 1978, subject: National Security Information, and the Implementing Directive dated September 29, 1978, issued through the Information Security Oversight Office.
EXHIBIT 10.3


 


American Power Group Corporation


Amendment Number 1 To Employment Agreement


 


WHEREAS, American Power Group Corporation (the
“Company”) and Chuck Coppa entered an Employment Agreement on April 25, 2016;


 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to make certain
changes to the Employment Agreement;


 


WHEREAS, Chuck Coppa will consider certain
changes to the Employment Agreement;


 


WHEREAS, Paragraph 11.2 of the Employment
Agreement provides for amending said Employment Agreement if both parties concur and sign in writing;


 


NOWTHEREFORE, the following changes have been
mutually agreed to:


 


		1.	Paragraph 7.4 Amounts Payable Upon Termination 



 


The body of Paragraph 7.4 is deleted
in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


7.4 Amounts Payable Upon Termination.
Upon termination of the Employee’s employment with the Company in accordance with clause (b), (d) or (e) of Section 7.1,
all compensation and benefits under this Agreement will cease, effective the date of termination. Upon termination of the Employee’s
employment with the Company in accordance with clause (a) and (c) of Section 7.1, all compensation under Sections 5.1 through
5.7 shall cease, effective upon the date of termination; provided, however, that if (i) the Employee executes a release in favor
of the Company substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit A not later than 30 days after such termination and (ii) the
period in which the Employee is entitled to revoke such release has expired without any such revocation, then, beginning on the
45th day after the date of such termination, the Employee shall continue to receive, for a period of three months from
the date of Employee’s notice of termination given pursuant to Section 7.1(c) the following: (i) Base Salary, paid at the
same salary rate being paid on the date of termination, in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practices (with
the first such payment including all amounts due from the date of termination through the date of such first payment), and (ii)
the benefits described in Section 6. Other than as specifically set forth in Sections 6.2, 7.1, and this Section 7.4, the Employee
will not be entitled to receive any compensation or benefits after termination of his employment with the Company.


 


There being no other changes,
the balance of the Employment Agreement remains unchanged.


 


BY SIGNATURE BELOW, the
Parties hereby mutually agree to the amendment as described herein,


 


	 	Employee	 	Company
	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/
Charles Coppa	 	/s/ Maury Needham
	 	Charles Coppa	 	Maury Needham
	 	CFO	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	 	 	 
	 	Date:	January 11, 2017
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15711]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors Committee on 
Provision for the Delivery of Legal Services

TIME AND DATE: The Committee on Provision for the Delivery of Legal 
Services of the Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors will meet 
on June 25, 2000. The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and continue 
until the Committee concludes its agenda.

LOCATION: Radisson Plaza Hotel Minneapolis, 35 South 7th Street, 
Minneapolis, MN 55402.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   
    1. Approval of agenda.
    2. Approval of the minutes of the Committee's meeting of April 14, 
2000.
    3. Staff report on the status of the development of new performance 
guidelines to measure outcomes in casework, community education, and 
outreach.
    4. Staff report, plans, and preparations for 2001 conference on 
client-centered legal services.
    5. Field presentation on legal services to Native Americans, 
farmers, and victims of domestic violence in Minnesota.
    6. Consider and act on other business.
    7. Public comment.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for 
Legal Affairs, General Counsel and Secretary of the Corporation, at 
(202) 336-8800.

dated: June 15, 2000.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Shannon Nicko Adaway, at (202) 336-8800.

    Dated: June 15, 2000.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate 
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15711 Filed 6-16-00; 3:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Textainer Equipment Income Fund VI 10K
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001003638
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund VI, LP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         729
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                   122
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5
<PP&E>                                         32,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 27,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          613
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   27,440
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,413
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (50)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                887
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   887
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5046

To provide that pay for prevailing rate employees in Pasquotank County,

North Carolina, be determined by applying the same pay schedules and

rates as apply with respect to prevailing rate employees in the local

wage area that includes Carteret County, North Carolina.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. JONES of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To provide that pay for prevailing rate employees in

Pasquotank County, North Carolina, be determined by

applying the same pay schedules and rates as apply

with respect to prevailing rate employees in the local

wage area that includes Carteret County, North Carolina.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF SAME PAY SCHEDULES AND

4 RATES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any provision of

6 subchapter IV of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code,

7 pay for prevailing rate employees in Pasquotank County,
2

•HR 5046 IH

1 North Carolina, shall be fixed and adjusted by applying

2 the same pay schedules and rates as apply with respect

3 to prevailing rate employees in the local wage area that

4 includes Carteret County, North Carolina.

5 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term

6 ‘‘prevailing rate employee’’ has the meaning given such

7 term under section 5342 of title 5, United States Code.

8 (c) REGULATIONS.—The Office of Personnel Man9 agement may prescribe any regulations necessary to carry

10 out this Act.

11 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall apply with re12 spect to pay for service performed in any pay period begin13 ning on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
AMERICAN GENERAL CORPORATION
             FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997




                                                                   Exhibit 11 


                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                    (Unaudited)
                        (In millions, except share data)

                                                        Nine Months Ended
                                                          September 30,      
                                                       1997          1996    
Primary:

   Net income available to common stock .......           $ 312         $ 558 

   Average shares outstanding
     Common stock .............................     241,631,360   243,320,348 
     Assumed conversion of convertible
       preferred stock ........................       1,950,940     1,578,392 
     Assumed exercise of stock options ........         934,163       996,788 

       Total ..................................     244,516,463   245,895,528 

   Net income per share .......................           $1.28         $2.27 


Fully Diluted:

   Net income .................................           $ 312         $ 558 
   Plus:  Net dividends on convertible 
    preferred securities of subsidiary ........               8             8 

       Net income available to common stock ...           $ 320         $ 566 


   Average shares outstanding
     Common stock .............................     241,631,360   243,320,348 
     Assumed conversion of convertible 
       preferred securities of subsidiary .....       6,144,016     6,144,016 
     Assumed conversion of convertible 
       preferred stock ........................       2,353,292     1,892,638 
     Assumed exercise of stock options ........       1,241,842     1,083,695 

       Total ..................................     251,370,510   252,440,697 

   Net income per share .......................           $1.27         $2.24 
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Schimatic Cash
Transactions Network.com, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Bernard F. McHale, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: January 31, 2008                  By: /s/ Bernard F. McHale
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Bernard F. McHale
                                             Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
3680 Thomas Ave.

Miami, FL 33133

Christopher Hudson

Board Secretary

863 NE 79th St.

Miami, FL 33138

Rebecca Pelham

Executive Director

 

South Dade Branch

P.O. Box 971515

Miami, FL 33197

Harold Ford

President

Miami-Dade Branch

P.O. Box 315

Opa-Locka, FL 33054

Daniella Pierre

President

June 17, 2023

Mayor Francis X. Suarez

Miami City Hall

3500 Pan American Drive

Miami, FL 33133

Copies to: Chief of Staff Wolfe, Clerk Hannon, Attorney Méndez

Re: Veto of City Commission’s Proposed “Remedial” Map

Dear Mayor Suarez,

On Wednesday, at the end of a rushed meeting that was noticed for 

discussion only, the City Commission passed a proposed “remedial” map for 

its districts. We urge you to veto it.

After finding we are substantially likely to win our case challenging last 

year’s Commission map as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, the federal 

district court gave the City an opportunity to pass a new, fair map. Rather than 

taking the opportunity the Court gave it, the Commission squandered it. This 

new map does nothing to cure the constitutional violations the Court identified.

We emphatically urge you to veto the Commission’s unconstitutional map.

We invite you to meet with us if you would like to discuss further.

Sincerely,

Christopher Hudson Rebecca Pelham

Secretary, GRACE Executive Director, Engage Miami

gracegrove@gmail.com rebecca@engage.miami

(786) 337-1703 (802) 522-4266

Harold Ford Daniella Pierre

President, South Dade NAACP President, Miami-Dade NAACP

president@southdadenaacp.org presidentofmiamidadenaacp@gmail.com

(786) 253-9400 (877) NAACP-09

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
                             HINES HOLDINGS, INC.
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                            (Dollars In thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                Year ended December 31
                                       ----------------------------------------
Fixed charges:                          1992    1993    1994    1995     1996
                                       ------  ------  ------  -------  -------
<S>                                    <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>      <C>
Interest expense                       $3,677  $6,014  $7,555  $13,274  $20,140
Amortization of deferred financing
 costs                                    403   1,079   1,069    4,557      940
Rental expense deemed representative
 of the interest expense component of
 rental expense
 **Assume 33 percent                      179     324     311      356      434
                                       ------  ------  ------  -------  -------

Total fixed charges                     4,259   7,417   8,935   18,187   21,514
                                       ------  ------  ------  -------  -------

Earnings:
Income before provision for income taxes,
  minority interest, income from
  discontinued operations and
  extraordinary loss                    6,260   6,229  14,258    8,441      844
                                       ------  ------  ------  -------  -------

Earnings plus fixed charges            10,519  13,646  23,193   26,628   22,358
                                       ------  ------  ------   ------   ------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       2.47    1.84    2.60     1.46     1.04
                                       ------  ------  ------   ------   ------
</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: WesternOregon plan revisions news**
 
Newsletters: Three | Four| Six | Seven| Nine
 
SuDoc Number:I 53.59/2: OR 3/5/
Item Number:0629-E-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001062133
 
June 25, 2018
### MCELROY , DEUTSCH , MULVANE Y & CARPENTER , LL P ATTORNEY S A T LA W

JOH N P
. BEYE L Direc t dial ; (973

) 425-874 6 jbeyel@m(lmc-law.co m 130 0 MOUN TKEMBL E AVENU E P.O
. BO X 207 5 MORRISTOWN , NE W JERSE Y07962-207 5

(973)993-810 0 FACSIMIL E (973 ) 425-016 1 

### SE P 2 D 201 0



## HEABIN G DOCKE T

Vi aOvernigh t

Mai l Septembe r 17,201 0

Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 ATTN : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 Re ; I nth e Matte r

o f Cenogenic s Corporatio n)f'fV( ^ ciLO/O" ' C/ ? Z^ FA A Docke t

No . CP10EA000 7 ' MDM C No. : C0099-100 0 

### 1 3
e n

— 1 ^ : , --:' • ~C 3

C O

Dear Sir/Madam : Enclose dherewit hpleas e findanorigina l an don e cop y o f aNotic e o f

Appearanc e o f covmse l for respondent , Cenogenic s Corporation , i nth e abov e captione dmatter . Kindl y file same , stamp th e cop y "filed ' an dretur nacop y i nth e self-addressed , stampe denvelop e provided
.

Very trul y yours , MCELROY , DEUTSCH , MULVANE Y & CARPENTER , LL P

JPB/p s cc : Th e Honorabl e Rormi e A
. Yode r (vi aOvernigh t

mail , w/enclosure ) Jeanin e C
. Gotime r

(vi aregular

mail , w/enclosure ) Michae l Kat z (vi aregula r mail , w/enclosure )

NEWARK , NE WJERSE Y RIDGEWOOD , NE WJERSE Y NE WYORK , NE WYOR K DENVER , COLORAD O PHILADELPHIA , PENNSYLVANI A 121873 5 1

### MCELROY , DEUTSCH , MULVANE Y & CARPENTER , LL

P 130 0 Moun t

Kembl e Avenu e P.O
. Bo x 207 5 Morristown , Ne w Jerse y 07962-207 5 (973)993-810 0 Attorney s fo r

Respondent , Cenogenic s Corporatio n 

# diVE D ; G: P 

## 2 G 201 0 

## \IM GDOCKET

I NTH EMATTE RO FCENOGENIC S CORPORATIO N UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC EO FHEARING S FA A Docke t

No . CP10EA000 7 FDM S No . FAA-2010-078 6 NOTIC EO FAPPEARANC E

Respondent , Cenogenic s Corporation , hereb y notifie s th e Unite dState s Departmen t

o f Transportation , Offic e o f Hearings , an dth e Complainant , pursuan t t o 1 4 C.F.R
. § 13.204(b) , tha t

i t shal l b e represente di nth e above-state dactio nb y th e followin g attorney . Joh nP . Beye l

McElroy , Deutsch , Mulvane y & Carpenter , LL P 130 0 Moun t

Kembl e Avenu e P.O
. Bo x 207 5 Morristown , Ne w Jerse y 07962-207 5 (973)993-810 0 Al l communications , notices , pleading s o r document s ar e respectfiill y requeste dt o b e forwarde dt o th e imdersigned
. By : Dated : ,^fj)- f \ 1 0-^ > •s>

.