alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 24.2****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mark A.Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full powerof substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical PartnersInternational, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposesas he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of saidattorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.              /s/ Joel T. Allison   Joel T. Allison
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 786 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 786

      To terminate the participation of the Forest Service in the 
                Recreational Fee Demonstration Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1999

  Mrs. Bono (for herself, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Cook, Mrs. Emerson, and Mr. 
   DeFazio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
      Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 
Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To terminate the participation of the Forest Service in the 
                Recreational Fee Demonstration Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Forest Tax Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF RECREATIONAL FEE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM FOR THE 
              FOREST SERVICE.

    (a) Termination.--On and after the effective date of this section, 
the Secretary of Agriculture may not impose or collect any fee under 
the authority of the Recreational Fee Demonstration Program authorized 
by section 315 of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1996 (section 101(c) of Public Law 104-134; 16 
U.S.C. 460l-6a note). Amounts collected before that date shall continue 
to be used by the Secretary in the manner provided in that section.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 315 of the Department of the 
Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996 (section 101(c) 
of Public Law 104-134; 16 U.S.C. 460l-6a note), is amended as follows:
            (1) In subsection (a), by striking ``and the Secretary of 
        Agriculture (acting through the Forest Service) shall each'' 
        and inserting ``shall''.
            (2) In subsection (b), by striking ``appropriate 
        Secretary'' and inserting ``Secretary''.
            (2) In subsection (e), by striking ``and the Secretary of 
        Agriculture''.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made by this 
section shall take effect 10 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.212-3 Right to counsel.

In all proceedings under this § 101-6.212 the applicant or recipient and GSA shall have the right to be represented by counsel.
#### § 102-5.115 When must we report our determinations?

You must report your determinations to Congress no later than 60 calendar days after approval. You may consolidate any subsequent determinations into a single report and submit them quarterly.
#### § 102-36.380 Who is responsible for disposing of foreign excess personal property?

Your agency is responsible for disposing of your foreign excess personal property, as provided by chapter 7 of title 40 of the United States Code.

[65 FR 31218, May 16, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 53572, Sept. 12, 2006]
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, David P. Holveck, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ David P. Holveck                 
|David P. Holveck                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 29, 2008
#### § 105-64.802 Can I appeal a decision to a privacy complaint?

You may file an appeal within 30 workdays of a denial of a privacy complaint by writing to: GSA Privacy Act Officer (CIB), General Services Administration, 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405. Mark both the envelope and appeal letter “Privacy Act Complaint appeal”.
§ 101-39.105 Discontinuance or curtailment of service. ( a ) If, during any reasonable period not exceeding 2 successive fiscal years, no economies or efficiencies are realized from the operation of any fleet management system, the Administrator, GSA, will discontinue the fleet management system concerned.
( b ) The Administrator, GSA, may discontinue or curtail a fleet management system when he or she determines that sufficient economies or efficiencies have not resulted from the operation of that fleet management system. The Administrator, GSA, will give at least 60 calendar days notice of his or her intent to the heads of executive agencies affected and to the Director, OMB, before taking action.
[56 FR 59888, Nov. 26, 1991]
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

August 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-31216

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BRYAN KEITH MCCALL,

also know as Sealed Defendant #2,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 03-CR-15-B-2

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Bryan Keith Mc Call appeals his sentence for aiding and

abetting the attempted bribery of a public official. McCall argues

that his 86-month sentence must be vacated in light of United

States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005) because it is based on

contested facts not established by McCall’s guilty plea.

In Booker

, the Supreme Court held that “[a]ny fact (other than

a prior conviction) which is necessary to support a sentence

exceeding the maximum authorized by the facts established by a pleaNo. 03-31216

-2-

of gu ilty or a jury verdict must be admitted by the defendant or

proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.” B ooker

, 125 S. Ct. at

756

. Booker also struck down 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b)(1) and thus

rendered the Sentencing Guidelines advisory rather than mandatory.

Id. at 764-65.

The distr ict court found that the purpose of McCall’s

attempted bribery was to obstruct justice in a drug-trafficking

prosecution and calculated his sentence using an estimated quantity

of drugs reasonably a ttributable to the drug conspiracy. McCall

objected that his sentence should be computed using the Sentencing

Guideline for simple bribery because there was “no evidence” that

he was involved in the drug conspiracy. McCall’s 86-month sentence

e xceeded the maximum sentence that could have been imposed ba sed

solely on his plea and, thus, constituted a Sixth Amendment

violation under Booker

. See Booker , 125 S. Ct. at 769.

When, as here, a defendant has pres erved a B ooker Sixth

Amendment error in the district court , we will ordinarily vacate

the sentence and remand, unless we determine that the error is

harmless under Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(a). U nited States v. Akpan

, 407

F.3d 360, 376 (5th Cir. 2005). Under Akpan , the Government must

establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the Booker error did not

contribute to McCall’s sentence. A kpan

, 407 F.3d at 377. Because

we conclude that the Government has not met its burden of showing

that McCall’s 86-month sentence is harmless under Booker

, we vacateNo. 03-31216

-3-

McCall’s sentence and remand the case to the district court for

resentencing.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-81883-Ruiz/McCabe

BRITTANY ROBERSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HEALTH CAREER INSTITUTE LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER FOLLOWING SEPTEMBER 6, 2023 DISCOVERY HEARING

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Define the Scope of 

Financial Discovery (DE 89) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony (DE 91). 

Being fully advised, the Court ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows:

1) The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony (DE 91). 

Defense witnesses Pedro De Guzman (in his capacity under Fed. R. Civ. P. 

30(b)(6)) and Steven Hart shall sit for subsequent depositions, at times and places 

mutually agreed to by the parties, and shall answer the questions they were

instructed not to answer during their previous depositions. The Court has reviewed 

the transcripts of the previous depositions and finds the questions to be within the 

permissible scope of discovery. See Myers v. Central Florida Investments, Inc., 

No. 6:04-cv-1542, 2005 WL 8159929, *3 (M.D. Fla. 2005) (“[M]ost federal courts 

which have addressed the issue have adhered to the view that information about a 

defendant’s net worth is relevant whenever punitive damages are pled...”); Fantroy 

v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., No. 8:12-CV-1940, 2013 WL 12156111, at *1 (M.D. 

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Fla. Oct. 30, 2013) (“[A] motion to compel answers to deposition questions should 

be granted if the questions are relevant to a party’s claim or defense and do not seek 

privileged information.”)

2) In light of the ruling in paragraph 1, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Defendants’ 

Motion to Define the Scope of Financial Discovery (DE 89).

3) Finally, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ request for an award of attorney’s fees 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, as the Court finds Defendants’ arguments on these 

issues were substantially justified.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach in the Southern District of

Florida, this 6th day of September 2023.

RYON M. MCCABE

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 102-3.120 What are the responsibilities and functions of a DFO? ( a ) The agency head or, in the case of an independent Presidential advisory committee, the Secretariat, must designate a Federal officer or employee who must be either full-time or permanent part-time, to be the DFO for each advisory committee and its subcommittees, who must: ( 1 ) Ensure that their committee activities comply with the Act, this part, their agency administrative procedures, and any other applicable laws and regulations;
( 2 ) Approve or call all meetings of the advisory committee or subcommittee;
( 3 ) Approve the agenda, except that this requirement does not apply to a Presidential advisory committee;
( 4 ) Attend all advisory committee and subcommittee meetings for their duration;
( 5 ) Fulfill the requirements under sec. 10(b) of the Act (codified at 5 U.S.C. 1009(b));
( 6 ) Adjourn any meeting when he or she determines it to be in the public interest;
( 7 ) Chair any meeting when so directed by the agency head;
( 8 ) Maintain information on advisory committee activities and provide such information to the public, as applicable; and
( 9 ) Ensure advisory committee members and subcommittee members, as applicable, receive the appropriate training (*e.g.,* FACA overview, ethics training) for efficient operation and compliance with the Act and this part.
( b ) The DFO should ensure a public facing website is created and maintained (that complies with the requirements of relevant sections of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 794) for each advisory committee, and include information such as: the advisory committee charter; relevant laws, regulations, and guidance; advisory committee member rosters and subcommittee member rosters, as applicable; Federal Register notices; meeting information (such as agendas, meeting materials, and minutes); reports and recommendations; and any other information that would increase the transparency and public understanding of advisory committee functions and activities and assist in fulfilling the requirements under sec. 10(b) of the Act (codified at 5 U.S.C. 1009(b)).
#### § 102-83.125 Who must approve the final delineated area?

The Federal agency conducting the space acquisition must approve the final delineated area for the site acquisition or action. The acquiring agency must confirm that the final delineated area complies with all applicable laws, regulations and E.O.s.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE DECEMBER 31, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001003950
<NAME>                                         PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                          9,792
<SECURITIES>                                   22,007
<RECEIVABLES>                                   9,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                     3,910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               46,996
<PP&E>                                          5,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 49,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           7,987
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                          132
<OTHER-SE>                                     40,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   49,142
<SALES>                                        44,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               44,494
<CGS>                                          15,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  19,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,625
<INCOME-TAX>                                    5,399
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             6,226
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                    6,226
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.45



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15790]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2316-000]


NEPA Energy LP; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 19, 2000.
    NEPA Energy LP (NEPA) submitted for filing a rate schedule under 
which NEPA will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions as a marketer. NEPA also requested waiver of various 
Commission regulations. In particular, NEPA requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by NEPA.
    On June 13, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by NEPA should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, NEPA authorized to 
issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor, 
indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and compatible 
with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate 
for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of NEPA's issuances of security or assumption of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 13, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15790 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM

GRACE, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF MIAMI,

Defendant.

/

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.8, Plaintiffs give notice of the following supplemental authority: 

Common Cause, Fla. v. Byrd, No. 4:22-cv-109-AW-MAF, 2024 WL 1308119, at *39–42, 45–47 

(N.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2024) (three-judge court) (per curiam).

\e decision is the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in a challenge to 

Florida’s congressional map under a different Fourteenth Amendment theory. But pertinent to this 

case, the decision (1) applies the one plaintiff standing rule in a decision on the merits and (2) finds 

that a membership organization can establish standing to challenge electoral districts with similar 

evidence as in this case, including when the organization keeps confidential the details of its 

membership information.

\e decision supports Plaintiffs’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (ECF 

No. 181) ¶¶ 7, 26–28.

Respectfully submitted March 29, 2024,

/s/ Nicholas L.V. Warren

Nicholas L.V. Warren (FBN 1019018)

ACLU Foundation of Florida

1809 Art Museum Drive, Suite 203

Jacksonville, FL 32207

Neil A. Steiner*

Julia Markham-Cameron*

Dechert LLP

\ree Bryant Park

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 184 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2024 Page 1 of 2
2

(786) 363-1769

nwarren@aclufl.org

Daniel B. Tilley (FBN 102882)

Caroline A. McNamara (FBN 1038312)

ACLU Foundation of Florida

4343 West Flagler Street, Suite 400

Miami, FL 33134

(786) 363-2714

dtilley@aclufl.org

cmcnamara@aclufl.org

Gregory P. Luib*

Dechert LLP

1900 K Street NW

Washington, DC 20006

(202) 261-3413

gregory.luib@dechert.com

1095 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036

(212) 698-3822

neil.steiner@dechert.com

julia.markham-cameron@dechert.com

Christopher J. Merken*

Dechert LLP

Cira Centre

2929 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19104

(215) 994-2380

christopher.merken@dechert.com

* Admitted pro hac vice

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 184 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2024 Page 2 of 2
#### § 109-40.110-1 Small business assistance.

Consistent with the policies of the Government with respect to small businesses, DOE shall place with small business concerns a fair proportion of the total purchases and contracts for transportation and related services such as packing and crating, loading and unloading, and local drayage.
No. 11-9164.

#### Moore *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### § 109-1.104-50 Publication and distribution of DOE-PMR.

The DOE-PMR will be published in the Federal Register and will appear in the CFR as Chapter 109 of Title 41, Public Contracts and Property Management. Written publications of the DOE-PMR will be distributed to DOE offices.
No. 10-10733.

#### Dopp *v.*Oklahoma.

Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 170-21   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 1 of 5

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 170-21   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 2 of 5

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 170-21   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 3 of 5

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 170-21   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 4 of 5

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 170-21   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 5 of 5