alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Bay Needle Care Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Stephon Greaves, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>NY City Transit Authority, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Joseph Padrucco of counsel), for appellant.Jones Jones, LLP (Agnes Neiger of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Katherine A. Levine, J.), entered September 12, 2016. The order granted the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground of exhaustion of coverage and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs. </p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground of exhaustion of coverage, or, in the alternative, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), on the ground that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment. By order entered September 12, 2016, the Civil Court granted the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment on the ground of exhaustion of coverage and denied plaintiff's cross motion.</p><p>As defendant correctly argues, since the action was not commenced until more than three years after the cause of action had accrued, the action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations set forth in CPLR 214 (2) (<a href="../2018/2018_03093.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Contact Chiropractic, P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth.</i>, 31 NY3d 187</a> [2018]; <a href="../2018/2018_51582.htm" target="_blank"><i>S &amp; R Med., P.C. v NYCTA-MABSTOA</i>, 61 Misc 3d 138</a>[A], 2018 NY Slip Op 51582[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2018]). In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the alternative ground raised in defendant's motion.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: March 22, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CHILDTIME LEARNING CENTERS, INC FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 3,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1998
<CASH>                                           5,541
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                       225
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,756
<PP&E>                                          44,318
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,869
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,812
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,118
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,828
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (260)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,911
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,565
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,346
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,346
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”)on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis D. Oklak,President and Chief Operating Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | /s/  Matthew  A. Cohoat |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Matthew A.  Cohoat                |
|   | Executive  Vice President and     |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer          |
|   | of the  General Partner           |
|   | March 9,  2004                    |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Matthew A.Cohoat, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the GeneralPartner, and will be retained by Mr. Cohoat and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission upon request.

 

----
#### § 102-75.265 Are conveyance documents required to identify all agreements and representations concerning property restrictions and conditions?

Yes, conveyance documents must identify all agreements and representations concerning restrictions and conditions affecting the property's future use, maintenance, or transfer.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS






|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
    ended September 30, 2005 (the Periodic Report)
    which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
|  
|2. | Information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
    all material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of AT&T Corp.                                                                                                                                 



| |                    
| | -------------------
| | /s/ David W. Dorman
| |                    
| | David W. Dorman
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ

AND EDITH ROMAN,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-14-00315-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Alejandro Hernandez and Edith Roman, have filed a pro se petition for writ of 

mandamus against the Honorable Thomas Spieczny, Judge of the County Court at Law No. 7 of 

El Paso County, Texas. They ask that we order Respondent to set aside an order entered on 

November 21, 2014 staying cause number 2014-DCV0146, styled Alejandro Hernandez and 

Edith Roman v. Danielle McCulley a/k/a Danielle McCully-Stogner, pending resolution of a 

criminal case (cause number 20130C13537 pending in the County Court at Law No. 3 of El Paso 

County). Relators have also filed a motion for emergency relief.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the 

relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance 

Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate 

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 136. Based on the record before us, we 

conclude that Relators have not established they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, 
- 2 -

we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for emergency relief. See

TEX.R.APP.P. 52.8(a), 52.10.

January 14, 2015

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEFJUSTICE DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE BOB PEMBERTON. JUSTICE MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE
The Honorable Velva L. Price Civil District Clerk 

### Travis County Courthouse P.O.Box 1748 

### Austin, TX 78767 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * 

# Court ofAppeals Third District ofTexas P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547 www.txcourte.gov/3rdcoa.aspx (512) 463-1733
JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK


### March#2015



### RE: Court ofAppeals Number: 03-10-00296-CV Trial Court Case Number: D-1 -GN-09-003426 

### Style: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality v. Public Citizen, Inc. Dear Honorable Velva L. Price: 

### The Third Court ofAppeals has issued the mandate in this cause. Therefore, I am returning the following original exhibits: 1 box ofadministrative record. 

### Very truly yours, 

### Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Filed inThe DistrictCourt



### of Travis County, Texas 

## MAR 12 2015 At M. Velva L. Price, District Clerk 

## /fait,
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                               HINES HORTICULTURE

                            CERTIFCATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
A. Ferguson, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                    operations of the Company.


                                            By:   /S/ ROBERT A. FERGUSON
                                                  ----------------------
                                                  Robert A. Ferguson
                                                  CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
                                                  (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)


April 11, 2003




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hines Horticulture, Inc. and will be retained by Hines Horticulture,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 105-60.201 Description of records sought. ( a ) Requesters shall describe the records sought in sufficient detail to enable GSA personnel to locate them with a reasonable amount of effort. To the extent possible, requesters should include the following information in their FOIA request, which may help GSA identify the requested records the date/timeframe the requested information was created or occurred, title or name, author, recipient, subject matter of the record, case number, file designation, contract number, leasing identification number, or reference number and if known, the component of GSA housing the records.
( b ) Before submitting a FOIA request, requesters may contact the GSA FOIA Requester Service Center or GSA FOIA Public Liaison to discuss the records they seek and to receive assistance in describing the records. If after receiving a request, GSA determines that it does not reasonably describe the records sought, GSA shall inform the requester what additional information is needed or why the request is otherwise insufficient. Requesters who are attempting to reformulate or modify such a request may discuss their request with their assigned Government Information Specialist or FOIA Public Liaison. If a request does not reasonably describe the records sought, GSA's response to the request may be delayed.
( c ) In order to efficiently respond to FOIA requests within the required 20-business-day timeframe per 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A), GSA may close an unperfected request 10 business days after GSA notifies the requester of the information needed to perfect the request. If the request does not reasonably describe the records sought, it is unperfected. A perfected FOIA request is a FOIA request for records that adequately describes the records sought, is made in accordance with GSA's regulations, has been received by the GSA FOIA Requester Service center, and for which there is no remaining question about the payment or amount of applicable fees.
( d ) Requesters may specify whether they prefer to receive paper copies of the records or receive the records electronically. GSA shall accommodate the request if the record is readily reproducible in the requested form.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-1303

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

JULIO A. PEREIRA,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on December 3, 2001, is amended

as follows:

On page 10, lines 11 - 15: Delete the last two sentences of this

paragraph, beginning with "At the very least . . ." and ending with ".

. . speak of this requirement."

On page 11, footnote 3: Change the first sentence of the footnote,

substituting "importance of irreplaceability to the determination of

extraordinariness" for "irreplaceability requirement."

On page 12, line 15: Add "or otherwise extraordinary" to the end

of the sentence to read "to characterize Pereira's care as

irreplaceable or otherwise extraordinary."

On page 13, lines 24 - 26 and page 14, lines 1 - 3: Delete the

first two sentences of the conclusion. 

On page 14, line 4: Conclusion should read, "Because Pereira's

circumstances are not so compelling as to remove him from the

Guidelines' "heartland," we conclude that the district court abused its

discretion in granting Pereira a downward departure. We reverse and

remand this case for action consistent with this opinion."
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 189/EUROCAE Working Group 53; Air Traffic 
Services; Safety and Interoperability Requirements

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a 
joint Special Committee (SC)-189/EUROCAE Working Group (WG)-53 meeting 
to be held January 31-February 4, 2000, starting at 9:00 a.m. The 
meeting will be held at EUROCAE, 17 rue Hamelin, Paris, France 16.
    The agenda will be as follows: Monday, January 31: Opening Plenary 
Session Convenes at 9:00 a.m.: (1) Introductory Remarks; (2) Review and 
Approve Agenda; (3) Review and Approve Summary of the Previous Meeting; 
(4) Sub-Group and Related Reports; (5) Position Papers Planned for 
Plenary Agreement; (6) SC-189/WG-53 Co-chair Progress Report. Tuesday, 
February 1 through Thursday, February 3: (7) Sub-group Meetings. 
Friday, February 4: Closing Plenary Session: (8) Introductory Remarks; 
(9) Review and Approval of Agenda; (10) Review of Preliminary Meeting 
Minutes; (11) Sub-group and Related Reports; (12) Position Papers 
Planned for Plenary Agreement; (13) SC-189/WG-53 Co-chair Progress 
Report and (14) Closing.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036, by 
phone at (202) 833-9339, by fax at (202) 833-9434, or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#deb6b3b1adbbad9eacaabdbff0b1acb9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="630b0e0c10061023111700024d0c1104">[email protected]</span></a>. Members of the public may present a written statement 
to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 22, 1999.
Gregory D. Burke,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 00-157 Filed 1-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/d07b1474/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
23
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-127022) pertaining to the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan and the
2005 Stock Plan of Overhill Farms, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-130921) of our reports dated December 11, 2008, with respect to the
financial statements and schedule of Overhill Farms, Inc., and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting of Overhill Farms, Inc., included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 28,
2008.
   /s/
      ERNST & YOUNG LLP
  Los
Angeles, California
 December
11, 2008
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-cv-24013-RNS

CHENMING ZHOU,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED 

ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

_________________________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AS TO CERTAIN DEFENDANTS ONLY

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and by 

undersigned counsel, Plaintiff hereby voluntarily dismisses with prejudice all claims against 

the following Defendants:

Xiaomo Store (Defendant No. 9 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

DingDong-Ringing (Defendant No. 15 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

ShangHaiOuLi (Defendant No. 16 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

Xinjiakio (Defendant No. 22 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

Yangfan (Defendant No. 25 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

Joyzone Store (Defendant No. 29 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

Deberían (Defendant No. 33 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

JIALI7SEC (Defendant No. 34 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

SIWODIOG Pet-Supplies (Defendant No. 41 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

Atril45 (Defendant No. 169 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

Case 1:22-cv-24013-RNS Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/17/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Keeper-mall (Defendant No. 210 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

lion.deals (Defendant No. 217 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

monkey.deals (Defendant No. 221 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

Power-ful (Defendant No. 231 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

Zhilsy (Defendant No. 265 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

OlyPegic (Defendant No. 279 on Schedule “A” to the Complaint)

Respectfully submitted on this 17

th day of March, 2023. 

LAW FIRM OF RUBIO & ASSOCIATES, P.A.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

8950 SW 74 Ct., Suite 1804

Miami, Fl 33156

Telephone: (786) 220-2061

Facsimile: (786) 220-2062

Email: hrubio@rubiolegal.com

Email: frubio@rubiolegal.com

Email: apuentes@rubiolegal.com

Email: info@rubiolegal.com

By:/s/ Felipe Rubio

Humberto Rubio, Jr., Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 36433

Felipe Rubio, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 123059

M. Arabella Puentes, Esq

Florida Bar No. 26825

Case 1:22-cv-24013-RNS Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/17/2023 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 19, 2010 

p0716 

Order 

 

July 19, 2010 

141242 & (3)(4)(5) 

In re: 

Petition of the Judicial Tenure Commission. 

 SC: 141242 

 JTC: Grievance Nos. 2010-18643 

 & 2010-18735 

_____________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the respondent’s motion for immediate consideration is 

GRANTED, and the motion for an extension of time to respond is GRANTED in part. 

The petition for interim suspension is considered, and it is GRANTED. 12th District 

Judge James M. Justin is suspended with pay until further order of this Court. Pursuant 

to MCR 9.219(A)(2), the processing of this case shall be expedited in the Judicial Tenure 

Commission and in this Court. Consistent with the respondent’s request, the motion to 

seal this Court’s file is DENIED. The unsealing of this Court’s file has no effect on the 

confidentiality of the Commission’s file or the requirements of MCR 9.221, which 

remain in effect. 

 

 KELLY, C.J. and CAVANAGH, J., would deny the petition for interim suspension 

but would expedite the processing of this case in the Judicial Tenure Commission. 

 WEAVER, J., not participating. I abstain from voting on any items dealing with the 

Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) and/or the Attorney Grievance Commission (AGC) to 

avoid any appearance that I could be trying to affect the outcome of the referrals of me to 

the JTC and AGC by Justices CORRIGAN, YOUNG and MARKMAN.