alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 105-50.101 Purpose. ( a ) This part 105-50 implements the provisions of Title III of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 1102, 42 U.S.C. 4221-4225), the purpose of which is stated as follows: It is the purpose of this title to encourage intergovernmental cooperation in the conduct of specialized or technical services and provision of facilities essential to the administration of State or local governmental activities, many of which are nationwide in scope and financed in part by Federal funds; to enable state and local governments to avoid unnecessary duplication of special service functions; and to authorize all departments and agencies of the executive branch of the Federal Government which do not have such authority to provide reimbursable specialized or technical services to State and local governments.
( b ) This part is consistent with the rules and regulations promulgated by the Director, Office of Management and Budget, in the Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-97, dated August 29, 1969, issued pursuant to section 302 of the cited Act (42 U.S.C. 4222).
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3


              KPMG INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT TO THE SERVICER

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT


The Board of Directors
Direct Merchants Credit Card Bank N.A.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Assertion, that Direct Merchants Credit Card Bank N.A., (the
Servicer) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers exclusive of standards I.2., I.4., III.3., III.4., V.2., V.3.,
and V.4., as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Management is
responsible for the Servicer's compliance with those minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Servicer's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Servicer's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Servicer complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 30, 2004
<PAGE>

                             Management's Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, Direct Merchants Credit Card
Bank N.A. (the "Servicer") complied in all material respects with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for the
following:

-    Minimum servicing standards I.2., I.4., III.3., III.4., V.2., V.3., and
     V.4., which the Servicer has interpreted as being inapplicable to credit
     card servicing.

As of and for the same period, the Servicer had in effect a fidelity bond, and
errors and omissions policies in the amount of $55 million.

                          DIRECT MERCHANTS CREDIT CARD BANK N.A.

                                 /s/ Scott R. Fjellman
                                 ------------------------------------------
                          Name:  Scott R. Fjellman
                          Title: Senior Vice President, Treasurer & Cashier

Date: March 30, 2004
#### § 102-78.15 What are historic properties?

Historic properties are those that are included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) as more specifically defined at 36 CFR 800.16.
From: "Kudlinski James F (Jim)" <Jim.Kudlinski@srpnet.com> To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 07/07/2010 10:43 AM Subject: SRP Request for Time Extension

Ms. Alicea: Attached as a PDF file is SRP’s request for a time extension for completing the CWA Section 308 Information Collection Request that was received at our Coronado, Desert Basin, Kyrene, Navajo and Santan Generating Stations. If you have any questions regarding this request, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. An original signature copy will follow via U.S. Mail. Thank you. Jim Kudlinski Salt River Project Phoenix, AZ 602-236-2351
(See attached file: SRP ICR Extension Request.pdf)
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM 

GRACE, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF MIAMI, 

Defendant. 

 / 

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF FILING ADMITTED TRIAL EXHIBITS 

(VOLUME III of III) 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5.3(b)(2) and the Court’s Paperless Order Scheduling Trial (ECF 

32), Plaintiffs file the attached exhibits admitted into evidence at trial:s 

Plfs.’ 

Tr. Ex. Description 

60 Yanelis Valdes State ID 

61 Jared Johnson State ID 

62 Alexandra Contreras Voter Card 

63 Steven Miro Voter Card 

64 1997 Plan 

65 2003 Plan 

66 2013 Plan 

67 2022 Plan 

68 Feb. 7, 2022 Draft 

69 Feb. 22, 2022 Draft/Base Plan 

70 Russell Sketch 

71 Initial Russell Plan 

72 Revised Russell Plan 

73 Reyes Plan 

76 2023 Plan 

77 Version 12 

78 D1 Alt Map (Version 14) 

79 D2 Alt Map 

80 D3 Alt Map v1 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 173 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 2
2 

81 D3 Alt Map v2 

82 D5 Alt Map 

83 Areas Moved from 2022 Plan to 2023 Plan 

84 Map Comparing Version 12 to 2023 Plan 

119 Report of Dr. Bryant Moy 

120 Dr. Bryant Moy’s CV 

121 Report of Dr. Carolyn Abott 

122 Report of Dr. Cory McCartan 

123 March 29, 2023 Preliminary Injunction Hearing Transcript Excerpt

Respectfully submitted February 2, 2024, 

 /s/ Caroline A. McNamara 

Nicholas L.V. Warren (FBN 1019018)

ACLU Foundation of Florida

1809 Art Museum Drive, Suite 203 

Jacksonville, FL 32207 

(786) 363-1769 

nwarren@aclufl.org 

Daniel B. Tilley (FBN 102882) 

Caroline A. McNamara (FBN 1038312) 

ACLU Foundation of Florida

4343 West Flagler Street, Suite 400 

Miami, FL 33134 

(786) 363-2714 

dtilley@aclufl.org 

cmcnamara@aclufl.org 

Gregory P. Luib* 

Dechert LLP 

1900 K Street NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

(202) 261-3413 

gregory.luib@dechert.com

Neil A. Steiner*

Julia Markham-Cameron* 

Dechert LLP 

ree Bryant Park

1095 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036

(212) 698-3822 

neil.steiner@dechert.com 

julia.markham-cameron@dechert.com 

Christopher J. Merken* 

Dechert LLP 

Cira Centre 

2929 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19104 

(215) 994-2380 

christopher.merken@dechert.com 

* Admitted pro hac vice 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 173 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 2 of 2
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

September 17, 2015

Hon. Thomas Kelley

Assistant District Attorney

801 W. Division

Orange, TX 77630

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Bryan Laine

1045 South Redwood

Kountze, TX 77625

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Stephen Carlton

Orange County Courthouse

801 Division Street

Orange, TX 77630

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00191-CR

Tr.Ct.No. E105654

Style: Salma Monala-Khalil v. The State of Texas

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: County Court at Law No. 2 (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Karen Vance, Orange County Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Olen Underwood, Presiding Judge, Second Administrative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
From: Yanca, Catherine

To: Yanca, Catherine

Subject: RE: AQ benefits discussion - 3/14 @ 2:15-2:45

Date: Friday, May 17, 2013 1:30:38 PM

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:08 AM

To: Sargeant, Kathryn

Subject: RE: AQ benefits discussion - 3/14 @ 2:15-2:45

Kathryn,

Here are the questions that we were able to put together in advance of this afternoon’s meeting.

We may have additional questions that we’ll ask on the call, but at least this covers a number of

them.

Thanks,

Chad

From: Whiteman, Chad

Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:54 PM

To: Sargeant, Kathryn

Subject: RE: AQ benefits discussion - 3/14 @ 2:15-2:45

May have something to pass along to you late tomorrow morning. Know that does not give you

much advance notice. Thanks for the call-in number.

From: Sargeant, Kathryn [ mailto:sargeant.kathryn@epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:47 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad

Subject: RE: AQ benefits discussion - 3/14 @ 2:15-2:45

Yes, we can do that.

We can use the same call-in: 866-299-3188; 734-214-4819#

If there are any questions you can pass along in advance, that would be helpful.

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:08 PM

To: Sargeant, Kathryn

Subject: AQ benefits discussion - 3/14 @ 2:15-2:45

Kathyrn,

Would you folks be available for a short discussion tomorrow afternoon to go over the air quality

benefits of the RIA (Chapters 6, 7, and 8)? We have an opening from 2:15-2:45.

Thanks,

Chad
KIM VAUGHAN LERNER LLP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23617-JAL 

MARCIA ENNIS, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

GUARD FORCE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

 Defendant. 

 / 

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING 

VERIFIED RETURN OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT 

Plaintiff gives notice of filing the attached Verified Return of Service on 

Defendant. 

Dated: November 16, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/Brian L. Lerner 

Brian L. Lerner (Fla. Bar No. 177202) 

blerner@kvllaw.com 

Kim Vaughan Lerner LLP 

312 SE 17th Street, Suite 300 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 

Telephone: (954) 527-1115 

Facsimile: (954) 527-1116 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 1:22-cv-23617-JAL Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2022 Page 1 of 4
2 

KIM VAUGHAN LERNER LLP 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on November 16, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that a true and 

correct copy of the foregoing document was served via transmission of Notices of 

Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for 

those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of 

Electronic Filing on all counsel or parties of record on the Service List below. 

 By: /s/Brian L. Lerner 

SERVICE LIST 

Brian L. Lerner 

blerner@kvllaw.com 

Kim Vaughan Lerner LLP 

312 SE 17th Street, Suite 300 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 

Telephone: (954) 527-1115 

Facsimile: (954) 527-1116 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Via Transmission of Notices of 

Electronic Filing Generated by CM/ECF 

Case 1:22-cv-23617-JAL Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2022 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:22-cv-23617-JAL Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2022 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:22-cv-23617-JAL Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2022 Page 4 of 4
#### § 102-75.595 What responsibilities do landholding agencies have concerning properties to be used for self-help housing or housing assistance use?

Landholding agencies must cooperate to the fullest extent possible with HUD representatives in their inspection of such property and in furnishing information relating to such property.
#### § 102-80.70 Are Federal agencies responsible for informing their tenants of the condition and management of their facility safety and environment?

Yes, Federal agencies must inform their tenants of the condition and management of their facility safety and environment. Agencies operating GSA buildings must report any significant facility safety or environmental concerns to GSA.
#### § 102-77.25 With whom should Federal agencies collaborate when commissioning visual art for Federal buildings?

To the maximum extent practicable, Federal agencies should seek the support and involvement of local citizens in commissioning a work of visual art. Federal agencies should collaborate with the chosen artist to commission works of visual art that reflect the cultural, intellectual, and historic interests and values of the community in which the art is to be located. In addition, Federal agencies should work collaboratively with the architect of the building and art professionals in commissioning visual art for Federal buildings. Federal agencies should commission a work of visual art that is diverse in style and media and no official style or media are mandated.
#### § 102-74.230 Who is responsible for establishing an occupant emergency program?

The Designated Official (as defined in § 102-71.20 of this chapter) is responsible for developing, implementing and maintaining an Occupant Emergency Plan (as defined in § 102-71.20 of this chapter). The Designated Official's responsibilities include establishing, staffing and training an Occupant Emergency Organization with agency employees. Federal agencies, upon approval from GSA, must assist in the establishment and maintenance of such plans and organizations.
Exhibit







July 12, 2019


Mr. Joseph DuFresne
1 Enterprise Avenue North 
Secaucus, New Jersey 07094


RE:    LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING


Dear Joe:


We are pleased to offer you the position of SVP of Finance, Corporate Development and Treasury effective July 16, 2019. Your salary will increase to $225,000 annually ($8,653.85 pay period) less payroll deductions and all required withholdings. In this position, you will report directly to me.


You will be eligible to participate in the 2019 Short Term Incentive Plan with a bonus opportunity of up to 50% of your actual earned base salary. Payment of the STIP award is based achievement of measurable goals as well as certain company budgeted goals being achieved or exceeded.


You will also be eligible for an annual grant in accordance with INAP's 2019 Long Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") or equivalent, equal to 100% of your base salary at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and based on performance. The annual grant may be in the form of restricted stock and will be subject to a three-year vest; no less than 50% of the grant will be subject to time, and 50% will be subject to performance as part of the Compensation Committee's approve metrics and the committee's discretion.


All vesting is subject to you being an employee in good standing on each date of vesting. All shares are governed by the language in our incentive stock plan (a copy of which will be mailed to you separately) as well as the actual grant documents which define the specific terms of your grant. You will be subject to INAP's Insider Trading Policy.


Although we hope that your relationship with INAP will be a long and productive  one, we are not requiring  a commitment from you for a particular length of time. Your employment with INAP will be "at will" meaning that you may choose to resign at any time for any reason, and INAP may choose to end your employment at any time for any reason. This offer should not be construed as creating a contract of employment for a specific period of time and the at-will nature of your employment can only be changed by a written employment agreement signed by you and INAP's Chief Executive Officer.


Please indicate your acceptance of this letter of understanding by signing and returning to the Human Resource Department.


Sincerely,


/s/ Peter Aquino


Peter Aquino 
President & CEO




ACCEPTED:     /s/ Joseph DuFresne                July 12, 2019
Joseph DuFresne                Date
J~g~ ED STqT,

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

~~l'9G PROZ ~G~\ 

0 

J U L 1 6 2013 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

J R Stroble, Manager 

National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

This letter provides the results of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) continued 

compliance inspection of the Central Characterization Project (CCP) waste characterization 

(WC) program for contact-handled (CH) and remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste at 

the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) near ldaho Falls, ID. This inspection occurred on May 7-9, 

2013. As a result of this continued compliance inspection, EPA confirms that the CH TRU waste 

characterization program implemented by the CCP at INL is technically adequate and compliant 

with 40 CFR 194.24 requirements. The enclosed report (EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49; II-A4- 

175) gives the details of the EPA evaluation of the program. 

EPA initially approved waste characterization activities at INL-CCP for CH waste in November 

2005 and for RH waste in January 2007 (RH) (EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49; II-A4-59 and No. 

A-98-49; II-A4-72). 

In accordance with 40 CFR 194.8(b), during this on-site inspection, EPA sampled the following 

TRU waste characterization activities and processes: 

• Acceptable knowledge (AK) for CH and RH wastes 

• Nondestructive assay (NDA) systems used for characterizing CH TRU wastes 

• Dose to Curie process for characterizing RH TRU waste 

• Real-time radiography (RTR) for RH TRU waste 

• Visual Examination (VE) for CH TRU waste 

During the inspection, EPA issued two concerns in the areas of VE and RTR which have been 

resolved. These are discussed in the enclosed report. 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable * Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
EPA continues to approve CCP's CH and RH TRU WC programs at INL in the configuration 

observed during the inspection and operated consistent with the limitations described in the 

baseline inspection report and subsequent Tier 1 approvals cited in Attachments A.1 and A.2. 

EPA confirms that INL-CCP has appropriately implemented and informed EPA of Tier 2 

changes since August 2006. 

If you have any questions, please contact Rajani Joglekar (202 343-9462) or Ed Feltcorn (202 

343- 9422). 

Sincerely, 

Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Enclosure 

cc:electronic distribution 

Alton Harris, DOE EM 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Norma Casteneda, CBFO 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO 

Ben Robert, DOE ID 

Jerry Wells, DOE ID 

Dave Haar, ITG 

Trais Kliphuis, NMED 

Site Documents, CBFO/LANL 

Jon Edwards, EPA
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue , Suite 900 Seattle , WA 98101

-3140

The Honorable Billy Frank, Jr. Chairman Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission 6730 Martin Way East Olympia, Washington 98516



# Dear**7~ <f~**  MAR 21 2013



# - OFFICE OF TH E REG IONAL A D MI N ISTRA TOR

Thank you for your letter dated February 21, 2013 , which was sent on behalfofthe Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission and continues our important discussion regarding human health protection ofWashington citizens through the development ofrevised water quality standards and an associated fish consumption rate. Your letter also provided a draft framework for a Government Leadership Oversight Group, which we understand was developed in partnership with all Washington tribes.
The U

.S. Environmental Protection Agency appreciates the time and effort you have put into working with all the Washington tribes to develop the draft framework in follow-up to our November 15, 2012 meeting. The draft framework provides an important starting point for our next meeting and will help ensure that the participants are aware ofthe expectations related to the government to government discussions with the EPA, the Washington tribes, and the Department ofEcology. As requested, the EPA has scheduled a leadership meeting on April 25, 2013, to discuss the draft framework as well as timelines and benchmarks for Ecology's adoption ofrevised human health criteria

. The EPA looks forward to continued collaboration with you and Ecology for a successful outcome

. Ifyou have further questions, please contact Dan Opalski, our Director for the Office ofWater and Watersheds, at (206) 553-1855.

cc: Ms. Maia Bellon, Director Washington Department ofEcology Dennis J. McLerran Regional Administrator

Ms. Fran Wilshusen, Habitat Services Manager Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission
Ms. Ann Seiter, Coordinator Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission
#### § 102-38.85 What is a sealed bid sale?

A sealed bid sale is a sale in which bid prices are kept confidential until bid opening. Bids are submitted either electronically or in writing according to formats specified by the selling agency, and all bids are held for public disclosure at a designated time and place.
#### § 101-26.509-1 Requisitioning tabulating machine cards available from Federal Supply Schedule contracts.

Federal Supply Schedule, FSC group 75, part VIII, includes contracts for tabulating cards applicable to electrical and mechanical contact tabulating machines, including aperture cards and copy cards. Federal agencies shall procure these cards in accordance with the provisions of the current schedule. Orders not exceeding the maximum order limitation of the Federal Supply Schedule and prepared directly by activities located outside the geographical delivery areas specified in the schedule shall be submitted in FEDSTRIP format to the GSA regional office supporting the geographic area in which the requisitioner is located.

[43 FR 32766, July 28, 1978]