alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the matter of: 

Federal Aviation 

Administration, 

BRIAN WALLAESA 

BRIAN A WALLAESA 

Complainant 

Respondent. 

••PART^^NTOF 

•'MSPORWION 

^-<•-]• OP£R/VnONS 

D ' U 20 P ^ 15 

FDMS No. FAA-2010-0628 

Case No. 201OWP190018 

Hon. Ronnie A. Yoder 

Objection to Motion of Protective Order 

The Respondent objects to the Motion of Protective Order filed by the 

Complainant. 

1. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.220 the moving party "must show that the 

protective order is necessary to protect the party or person for annoyance, 

embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense." 

2. The moving party has stated in the motion that the Respondent conveyed 

"sexually explicit" comments and "inappropriate touching" towards the 

'female passenger'. 

3. In the attached statements from the 'female passenger' and the 'FBI 

agent' submitted by the moving party, no such action of "inappropriate 

touching" was undertaken and therefore described, and within the 
description of the conversation, no such "sexually explicit" comments 

were made or described by either party. 

4. The time period has been greater than one year since the interaction 

between the Respondent and the 'female passenger', and within that time 

period, the Respondent has not requested or sought out any interaction 

with the 'female passenger'. 

5. It is the position of the Respondent that the Motion for the Protective order 

was not submitted for protection of the 'female passenger', but to 

introduce libelous statements into the public record of the hearing solely to 

defame the character and reputation of the Respondent. 

WHEREFORE, the Respondent respectfully requests this Court deny the motion to grant 

a protective order submitted by the Complainant prohibiting the release of the full name 

and contact information of the female passenger. 

Respect 

Jrian A. Wallaesa 

Respondent 

11272 Wortham Crest Circle 

Manassas, VA 20109 

(570)778-1335 

Dated November 15,2010
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 6, 2014

No. 04-13-00667-CR

Raymond Sandoval GARCIA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 383282

Honorable Genie Wright, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting:Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

In light of the opinion in Taylor v. State, No. PD-0180-13, 2014 WL 440990 (Tex. Crim. 

App. Feb. 5, 2014), we withdraw the opinion and order we issued in this appeal on January 8, 

2013, and reinstate the appeal on the docket of this court. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of February, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 109-38.202-3 Records. ( a ) The Office of Management assigns “blocks” of U.S. Government license tag numbers to DOE organizations and maintains a current record of such assignments. Additional “blocks” will be assigned upon request.
( b ) Each DOE direct operation and designated contractor shall maintain a current record of individual assignments of license tags to the motor vehicles under their jurisdiction.
---

---

Exhibit 10.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Registration Nos. 333-06784, 333-08146, 333-11842, 333-09350, 333-11154, 333-13686,
333-111112, 333-111113 and 333-134355) and on Form F-3 (Registration Nos. 333-07130,
333-07266, 333-07740, 333-12996, 333-12350, 333-109766 and 333-127883) of our reports
dated June 12, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of NICE-Systems
Ltd. and subsidiaries, NICE-Systems Ltd. managements assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of NICE-Systems Ltd. and subsidiaries included in theAnnual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

|Tel Aviv, IsraelJune 12, 2007 |  | /s/ KOST, FORER, GABBAY & KASIERER
KOST, FORER, GABBAY & KASIERERA Member of Ernst & Young Global
|----------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
## Martin, Michael (OST) From: 

### Sent: Darwin Skelton <DSkelton@flyscottsbluff.com> Monday, January 26, 2015 3:03 PM 

### To: Martin, Michael (OST) 

### Subject: ADI
Michael Western Nebraska Regional Airport would like to wait and see what happens in the appeal from ADI before we decide what our next course ofaction should be
.. Ifyou have any questions please feel free to call Thanking you in advance foryour help in this matterwith ADI.. Darwin Skelton Airport Director Western Nebraska Regional Airport 250023 AirportTerminal Street Suite 10 Scottsbluff Nebraska 69361 Office 308-635-4941 ext 7 Fax 308-632-7361 Cell 308-631-7449

1
#### § 102-75.299 What are landholding agencies' responsibilities if GSA conducts the disposal?

Landholding agencies are and remain responsible for all rental/lease payments until the lease expires or is terminated. Landholding agencies are responsible for paying any restoration or other direct costs incurred by the Government associated with termination of a lease, and for paying any demolition and removal costs not offset by the sale of the property. (See also § 102-75.965.)
User: glevesque Date: Mon Jan 29 2024 20:00:06 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

Plan: 2023 Plan V12_D3 Plan No.: e4e8b33cc26d401bbbcb95dbcadc7685 District Statistical Report

District

No.

TOTAL

Population

Target

Population

Target

Deviation

Target

Deviation

(%)

2018

General

Election

Votes for

Governor

TOTAL

2018

General

Election

Votes for

Democrat

Governor

Andrew

Gillum

2018

General

Election

Votes for

Republican

Governor

Ron

DeSantis

2018

Primary

Election

Votes for

Democrat

Governor

TOTAL

2018

Primary

Election

Votes for

Democrat

Governor

Andrew

Gillum

2018

Primary

Election

Votes for

Democrat

Governor

Gwen

Graham

2018

Primary

Election

Votes for

Democrat

Governor

Philip

Levine

D1 87,455 88,448 -993 -1.12 16,940 9,670 6,940 2,363 649 231 879

15.55% 57.08% 40.97% 11.05% 27.47% 9.78% 37.20%

D2 89,593 88,448 1,145 1.29 25,831 18,235 7,387 5,627 1,719 1,251 2,208

23.70% 70.59% 28.60% 26.31% 30.55% 22.23% 39.24%

D3 89,194 88,448 746 0.84 18,310 10,618 7,410 2,689 653 483 1,037

16.80% 57.99% 40.47% 12.57% 24.28% 17.96% 38.56%

D4 89,555 88,448 1,107 1.25 24,792 11,593 12,828 2,897 577 523 1,146

22.75% 46.76% 51.74% 13.55% 19.92% 18.05% 39.56%

D5 86,444 88,448 -2,004 -2.27 23,100 20,930 1,975 7,809 4,163 728 1,799

21.20% 90.61% 8.55% 36.52% 53.31% 9.32% 23.04%

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 171-22 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 599 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 599

  To amend the Consumer Credit Protection Act to make it unlawful to 
        require a credit card as a condition for doing business.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

  Mr. Fattah introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Consumer Credit Protection Act to make it unlawful to 
        require a credit card as a condition for doing business.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cash Consumer Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds:
            (1) Forms of payment other than cash have become more 
        pervasive in commercial transactions initiated by consumers.
            (2) Forms of payment other than cash are not uniformly 
        available to all consumers.
            (3) Consequently, cash only consumers are unable to enter 
        into certain commercial transactions.

SEC. 3. CREDIT CARD REQUIREMENT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 2 of title I of the Consumer Credit 
Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1631 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:

``SEC. 139A. CREDIT CARD REQUIREMENT.

    ``(a) In General.--No person may, in the course of a business 
transaction involving a sale or lease--
            ``(1) refuse to make the sale or lease because the 
        purchaser or lessee does not possess a credit card; or
            ``(2) demand a deposit in cash which is not reasonable.
    ``(b) Injunction.--An action may be brought to enjoin a person from 
taking action which is prohibited by subsection (a). If an injunction 
is awarded, the court may order the enjoined person to reimburse for 
money or property acquired in violation of subsection (a).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``139A. Credit card requirement.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 102-74.360 What are the specific accident and fire prevention responsibilities of occupant agencies? Each occupant agency must— ( a ) Participate in at least one fire drill per year;
( b ) Maintain a neat and orderly facility to minimize the risk of accidental injuries and fires;
( c ) Keep all exits, accesses to exits and accesses to emergency equipment clear at all times;
( d ) Not bring hazardous, explosive or combustible materials into buildings unless authorized by appropriate agency officials and by GSA and unless protective arrangements determined necessary by GSA have been provided;
( e ) Use only draperies, curtains or other hanging materials that are made of non-combustible or flame-resistant fabric;
( f ) Use only freestanding partitions and space dividers that are limited combustible, and fabric coverings that are flame resistant;
( g ) Cooperate with GSA to develop and maintain fire prevention programs that provide the maximum safety for the occupants;
( h ) Train employees to use protective equipment and educate employees to take appropriate fire safety precautions in their work;
( i ) Keep facilities in the safest condition practicable, and conduct periodic inspections in accordance with Executive Order 12196 and 29 CFR part 1960;
( j ) Immediately report accidents involving personal injury or property damage, which result from building system or maintenance deficiencies, to the Federal agency building manager; and
( k ) Appoint a safety, health and fire protection liaison to represent the occupant agency with GSA.
#### § 109-50.202 Definitions.

As used in this subpart the following definitions apply:

*DOE Field Organizations* means the DOE Federal management activities, including Operations Offices, Field Offices, Area Offices, Site Offices, Energy Technology Centers, and Project Offices staffed by Federal employees.

*Education-related and Federal research equipment* includes but is not limited to DOE-owned property in FSCG 34, 36, 41, 52, 60, 61, 66, 67, 70, and 74 (See 41 CFR 101-43.4801(d)), and other related equipment, which is deemed appropriate for use in improving math and science curricula or activities for elementary and secondary school education, or for the conduct of technical and scientific education and research activities.

*Elementary and secondary schools* means individual public or private educational institutions encompassing kindergarten through twelfth grade, as well as public school districts.

*Eligible recipient* means local elementary and secondary schools and nonprofit organizations.

*Facilities under DOE Field Organization cognizance* means national laboratories, production plants, and project sites managed and operated by DOE contractors or subcontractors.
On appellant’s motion for reconsideration filed March 21,

reconsideration allowed; decision (133 Or App 448, 890 P2d 1016) vacated;

affirmed September 13, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JUSTIN BLAINE WALKER, *Appellant.*

(93D-101174; CA A83049)

902 P2d 137

Alan H. Biedermann, Deputy Public Defender, for motion.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; decision vacated; affirmed. *State v. Flowers,*136 Or App 555, 902 P2d 624 (1995).
§ 334.1320 Kuluk Bay, Adak, Alaska; naval restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The northwest portion of Kuluk Bay bounded as follows: Beginning on shore at latitude 51°55′00′′ N, longitude 176°33′09′′ W; thence due east to latitude 51°55′00′′ N, longitude 176°33′09′′ W; thence due south to latitude 51°51′55′′ N longitude 176°31′09′′ W; thence due west to the shore at latitude 51°51′00′′ N, longitude 176°37′43′′ W; thence along the shoreline to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Except in great emergency, no vessel shall anchor in the restricted area described above.
( 2 ) The dragging of anchors in or across the restricted area is prohibited and no object attached to a vessel shall be placed on or near the bottom.
( 3 ) Fishing and trawling activities in the restricted area are prohibited.
( 4 ) The regulation of this restricted area shall be enforced by the Commander, Patrol Wing, U.S. Pacific Fleet, Naval Air Station Moffett Field, California, and such agencies and he/she may designate.
[58 FR 26046, Apr. 29, 1993]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0795

_____________________________

MATTHEW AARON 

CRAWFORD-LYNCH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Judge.

February 12, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT NO. 99: CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

 

Written or oral statements made by Alcan or its representatives, including statements set forth in Alcan's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, which describe the Company's or management's objectives, projections, estimates, expectations or predictions of the future may be "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "estimates," "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon. The Company cautions that, by their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty and that the Company's actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements or could affect the extent to which a particular projection is realized.

Important factors which could cause the Company's actual performance to differ materially from projections or expectations included in forward-looking statements include global aluminum supply and demand conditions, aluminum ingot prices and changes in other raw materials costs and availability, cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for the Company's products, changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting environmental, health or safety compliance, economic developments and other factors within the countries in which the Company operates or sells its products and other factors relating to the Company's ongoing operations including, but not limited to, litigation, labour negotiations and fiscal regimes.

Copies of the Company's filings may be obtained by contacting the Company or the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
#### § 102-40.35 What types of personal property require special handling?

Personal property requiring special handling includes property containing hazardous materials or property which exhibits dangerous characteristics such that improper use, storage, transportation or disposal may lead to potential safety, health, environmental, economic, or national security risks. In many situations, the use, storage, transportation or disposal of these items is governed by Federal, state, and local laws. Personal property requiring special handling may also include animals and plants which may perish if not handled appropriately, as well as perishable products that may lose their utility if not handled appropriately.
#### § 102-75.715 When can a Federal agency request transfer of the property to the selected State agency?

Federal agencies must advise the disposal agency and request transfer of the property to the selected State agency within 30 calendar days after the expiration of the 30-calendar day period specified in § 102-75.705.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-52648,
333-120968 and 333-148339 on Form S-8 and No. 333-131115 on Form S-3 of Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) of our reports dated February 26, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of the Company (which report expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule and included an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,on January 1, 2007, and the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, on January
1, 2006), and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|February 26, 2008
## NUMBER 13 - 2 1 - 00 438 - CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF T .C. and K .C., C HILDREN
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces Co u nty, Texas.



## ORDER Before Justice s Hinojosa , Tijerina , and Silva

Order Per Curiam This is an appeal of a final order terminating parental rights. The court reporter has filed a first ten
- day request for extension of time to file the reporter’s record

. Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the rules o f appellate procedure for accelerated appeals but include additional expedited deadlines and procedures. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 28.4; T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN . 6.2(a). The intermediate appellate courts are directed to ensure “as far as reasonably possible” that2

the se appeals are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN . 6.2(a). Given the nature of these cases and the shortened appellate deadlines, we limit the request to one ten
- day extension of time absent truly extraordinary circumstances. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d). This Court, having fully examined and considered the court reporter ’s request is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, the court reporter’s first request for extension of
tim e to file the reporter’s record should be granted with order. The Court, however, requires strict adherence to the briefing rules in appeals of parental termination cases, such as this appeal, and looks with disfavor upon the delay caused by such extension requests. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6; see also id . at R. 28.4. The Court grants the court reporter ’s request for extension of time. This request is granted insofar as the Court will extend the court reporter ’s deadline to file the reporter’s
record t en (10) days from the date of this order . Further requests for extension of time will not be favorably entertained by this Court, absent extraordinary circumstances

.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the 9th day of February , 202 2

.
§ 105-68.925 Conviction. *Conviction* means— ( a ) A judgment or any other determination of guilt of a criminal offense by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether entered upon a verdict or plea, including a plea of nolo contendere; or
( b ) Any other resolution that is the functional equivalent of a judgment, including probation before judgment and deferred prosecution. A disposition without the participation of the court is the functional equivalent of a judgment only if it includes an admission of guilt.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5438 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5438

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to add Diabetes Mellitus (Type 
    2) to the list of diseases presumed to be service-connected for 
             veterans exposed to certain herbicide agents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2000

Mr. Evans (for himself, Mr. Mascara, and Mr. Gutierrez) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to add Diabetes Mellitus (Type 
    2) to the list of diseases presumed to be service-connected for 
             veterans exposed to certain herbicide agents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION THAT DIABETES MELLITUS (TYPE 2) IS SERVICE-
              CONNECTED.

    Section 1116(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(H) Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2).''.
                                 <all>
```