alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Munawar Hidayatallah, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        *Date: November 10 , 2005* *By:  **/s/ Munawar H. Hidayatallah*    *Munawar H. Hidayatallah*    *Chief Executive Officer andChairman*
#### § 102-37.555 What happens to property the American National Red Cross does not request?

Property the Red Cross declines to request will be offered to SASPs for distribution to eligible donees. If such property is transferred, GSA will require the SASP to ensure that all Red Cross labels or other Red Cross identifications are obliterated or removed from the property before it is used.
§ 102-118.95 What forms can my agency use to pay transportation bills? Your agency must use commercial payment practices and forms to the maximum extent possible; however, when viewed necessary by your agency, your agency may use the following Government forms to pay transportation bills: ( a ) Standard Form (SF) 1113, Public Voucher for Transportation Charges, and SF 1113-A, Memorandum Copy;
( b ) Standard Form (SF) 1103, Government Bill of Lading (used for movement of things, both privately owned and Government property for official uses);
( c ) OF 1169, Government Transportation Request (used to pay for tickets to move people); and
( d ) Privately Owned Personal Property Government Bill of Lading (used by the Department of Defense to move private property for official transfers).
[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 48812, Sept. 24, 2001; 87 FR 32324, May 31, 2022]
§ 101-5.306 Economic feasibility. ( a ) The studies by GSA which lead to the development of space requirements and the determinations made as the result thereof will constitute the feasibility studies and the Administrator's determination contemplated by § 101-5.104.
( b ) Each determination to provide health services will be governed by the principles stated in § 101-5.303 and will be in consonance with the general standards and guidelines furnished Federal agencies by the Public Health Service of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
#### § 102-75.505 Is the request for educational or public health use of a property by an eligible nonprofit institution contingent upon the disposal agency's approval?

Yes, eligible non-profit organizations will only receive surplus real property for an educational or public health use if the disposal agency approves or grants the assignment request from either ED or HHS. The disposal agency will also consider other uses for available surplus real property, taking into account the highest and best use determination. Any subsequent transfer is subject to the approval of the head of the disposal agency as stipulated under 40 U.S.C. 550(c) or (d) and referenced in this part.
§ 102-3.165 How are advisory committee meetings documented? ( a ) The agency head or, in the case of an independent Presidential advisory committee, the chairperson must ensure that detailed minutes of each advisory committee meeting, including one that is closed or partially closed to the public, are kept. The chairperson of each advisory committee must certify the accuracy of all minutes of advisory committee meetings.
( b ) The minutes must include: ( 1 ) The time, date, and place (or electronic format) of the advisory committee meeting;
( 2 ) A list of the persons who were present at the meeting, including advisory committee members and staff, agency employees, and members of the public who presented oral or written statements;
( 3 ) An accurate description of each matter discussed and the resolution, if any, made by the advisory committee regarding such matter; and
( 4 ) Copies of each report or other materials received, issued, or approved by the advisory committee at the meeting.
( c ) The DFO must ensure that minutes are certified for accuracy by the chairperson within 90 calendar days of the meeting to which they relate. Agencies should post the meeting minutes on the agency advisory committee website (if one exists) not later than 14 calendar days after the meeting minutes have been certified.
#### JAMES C. JACOBS, Respondent, *v.*SYLVESTER J. MILLER Appellant.

*Injunction*— damages *occasioned*by— *Code,*§ 222.

Where, in an action brought to procure an injunction, a temporary injunction is dissolved, and, subsequently, upon the trial, the complaint is dismissed, the successful party is entitled, under section 222 of the Code, to an order directing that the damages sustained by him shall be ascertained by a reference or otherwise, as the court may determine; and it is error for the court to deny a motion for a reference, without directing any other mode of ascertaining the damages, even though no damages would be allowed.

Appeal from au order denying a motion of defendant for a reference, under section 222 of the Code, to ascertain the damages sustained by the defendant by reason of a temporary injunction procured by the plaintiff in this action.

*Thomas F. Wmtworth,*for the appellant.

*Moody B. Smith,*for the respondent.

*442Brady, J.:

The plaintiff obtained a preliminary injunction, which was after-wards dissolved, and on appeal to the General Term the order of dissolution was sustained. The issue was, however, in due time brought to trial, and the complaint was dismissed, chiefly upon the ground urged by the defendant that the contract out of which the cause of action sprung was void, as against the policy of the law. In other words, the defendant having in his possession certain notes which the plaintiff had given him, and which the latter sought by injunction to prevent him from transferring or collecting, resisted the application for an injunction; and when the action was tried, ashed a dismissal of the complaint because the contract with which the notes were connected was void, and the plaintiff was, therefore, in no jeopardy and required no protection. There were other grounds, but this is one which was accepted by the justice presiding on the trial, and the complaint was dismissed. Under such circumstances, this does not seem to be a case in which any damages would be awarded, and the court at Special Term disposed of the motion for a reference to ascertain the defendant’s damages, under the provision in the undertaking given on obtaining the injunction, on that theory, by denying the motion. We are much inclined to follow that ruling, but we think the Code, by section 222, entitles an enjoined but successful party to some order stating the manner in which his damages shall be ascertained. *JPa/rk*v. *Musgrame*(13 N. T. Sup. Ct. R., 223), decided in this department, has so declared. The learned justice below refused to interfere and denied the motion. This did not carry out the provisions of the Code, which declare that the damages may be ascertained by a reference, or otherwise, as the court shall direct. The order made contained no direction, and, in effect, repudiated the right to an order determining the mode of ascertainment. We think the appellant was entitled, under the Code, to an order directing the manner in which his damages, if any, should be ascertained.

The order must, therefore, be reversed, but without costs.

Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J., concurred.

Order reversed, without costs.
#### § 109-1.5102 Maximum use of personal property.

Personal property management practices shall assure the best possible use of personal property. Supplies and equipment shall be generally limited to those items essential for carrying out the programs of DOE efficiently.
06/27/2012 15:46 FAX 2024835142 Ul)/ ""{/ ZUlZ H: 09 FAX 3107256816 FAA 

### AWP-7 -t 

### OMS



### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF 

### HEARINGS WASHING"fON, DC '',I• I ') llH L**~** 002/003**~002/00:J.**

'1 0 .r\ 0 t'' 

## 0 b -1:,, {)**/~'"'\** .. •

FAA Docket No. (to 

### be 

### assigned) 

### In the Matter of Butte 

### Steel & Fa.brieation, Inc.; FDMS No. FAA-2012-0199 Judge 

### Richard C. Good"Wi:n 

### Respondent.



### Noti\:e of Settlement 

### Please take notice 

### that the Butte Steel & Fabrication 

### matter (currently scheduled for hearing
on July 

### 12 and 13, 2012) 

### has settled. Accordingly, we respectfully request that this 

### matter be 

### removed from calendar.



### · tophcr Mertill Attorney Office ofthe Regional CounseJ Federal Aviation Admirust:ration 

### Western-Pacific Region.
DATED: 

### JUN 2 7 201206/27/2012 15:46 FAX 2024835142**vv'~''~v~~ ~~.v~** **rA~ ~LVI~~O~l~**  FAA AWP-7 ·

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### -. OMS 141003/003**~** 003/003


### 2

I hereby cenify that on this date I have sent by facsimile and regular United States 

### mail, the Noti,ce of 

### Settlement, addressed as 1-bllows: Federal Aviation 

### Administration 800 Independence AV(lnue, 

### SW 

### Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright**Building-Suit~** 

### 2Wl000 Facsimile: (202) 493-5142
Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey 

### Avenue, S.E. East Bldg., Ground 

### Floor, Room E12-320 Washington. D.C. 20590 Fax: 202-366-7536


### David 

### J. Murray Law. Officc::s ofDavid 

### J. Murray 341 Broadway, Suite 407 · Chico, CA 95928 Fax: 530-&96-1146 Dated; JUN 27 2012

# ·~~9**JeffKam~g,** Legal 

### Technici. Offioe ofthe 

### Regional Counse Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region 

### Lawndale, California
Strafford

No. 78-282

#### Sharon E. Reid v. Spadone Machine Company

March 30, 1979

*199*Burns, Bryant, Hinchey, Cox & Shea,*of Dover *(Jody A. Handy*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Calderwood, Ouellette & Hallisey,*of Dover *(William L. Tanguay*orally), for the defendant.

Per curiam.

The issue in this action for loss of consortium is whether the wife’s action is barred because her husband’s action has been terminated by a judgment against the same defendant. We hold that the claim is not barred.

Plaintiff’s husband was injured on November 15,1974, while using a machine manufactured by the defendant in the course of his employment by Davidson Rubber Company. He brought suit against the defendant and a trial resulted in a verdict in his favor in the amount of $150,000. After the entry of judgment in that case, plaintiff brought this action for loss of consortium. Defendant filed a “special plea and brief statement” claiming that the action was barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel. Plaintiff’s objection to the plea was sustained and defendant’s exception was transferred by *Cann,*J.

 A wife’s cause of action for loss of consortium is created by statute as a separate and distinct claim and is not derivative from the claim of the husband. RSA 507:8-a. The plaintiff is a separate and distinct party from her husband and she was not a party to his action. Therefore, neither res judicata nor collateral estoppel against her result from that judgment. *Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore,*99 S. Ct. 645 (1979).

 Defendant argues that the plaintiff should not be allowed to bring this action after waiting until the conclusion of her husband’s *200suit. We agree that plaintiff should have brought her action so as to have it joined with that of her husband. Plaintiffs brief states that defendant would not agree to such a joinder. Joinder, however, does not depend upon consent of the parties. The fact that, for the purpose of judicial administration, plaintiff’s action should have been joined with that of her husband does not however justify a dismissal of her action. It may be that consideration will be given by the superior court to a mandatory joinder rule in cases such as this; but none presently exists to bar plaintiff’s action.

*Exception overruled.*
##### 



DLS Argentina Limited
  Argentine Branch    By hand
 Re
      1. PARTIES
  2. PURPOSE
   3. RENDERING OF THE SERVICES
  4. RATIFICATION




---



##### 








---



##### 



Appendix I
 1.
    
    Drilling Service
  a.
    
    The Standard Hourly Rate K shall have following new value:K= 934.75 UM(30%USD)/hourb.
    
    In case that during a well completion more than 32.4 hours are employed in well
logging operations, in addition to the global amount LS payable per completed well, an
extra amount shall be payable, which shall be determined as follows:H1x SHRx H2x OHRWhere:H1= hours of logging exceeding the first 32.4 and up to a maximum of 48 hours in wholeH2= hours of logging exceeding the first 48 hoursSHR= as defined by Section 3.1.4 of the APPENDIX I  PRICES of the Strategic AgreementOHR= as defined by Section 3.1.2 of the APPENDIX I  PRICES of the Strategic Agreement
 2.
    
    Completion and Workover ServicesThe applicable rates defined by Sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 of the APPENDIX I  PRICES of
the Strategic Agreement shall have following new values:OHR= Operation Hourly Rate = 288.55 UM(19%USD)/hourSHR= Stand By Hourly Rate = 261.16 UM(19%USD)/hourCFHR= Climate Factor Hourly Rate = 186.84 UM(19%USD)/hourDTA(=)= DTA between wells located on a same flange = 4,862.00 UM(19%USD)/day + [Distance in
excess of 20 Km.] x 84.00 MU(19%USD)/Km.DTA(1)= DTA between wells located on different flanges = 11,142.62 UM(19%USD)3.
    
    Pulling ServiceThe certification modality and applicable rates defined by Sections 3.3.1, 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 of
the APPENDIX I  PRICES of the Strategic Agreement shall be modified as follows:Light PullingOHR= Operation Hourly Rate = 232.96 UM(16%USD)/hourSHR= Stand By Hourly Rate = 209.66 UM(16%USD)/hourCFHR= Climate Factor Hourly Rate = 116.48 UM(16%USD)/hourDTA= 931.84 UM(16%USD) + [Distance in excess of 20 Km.] x 15.53 MU(16%USD)/Km.




---



##### 



Heavy PullingOHR= Operation Hourly Rate = 263.24 MU(16%USD)/hourSHR= Stand By Hourly Rate = 236.92 MU(16%USD)/hourCFHR= Climate Factor Hourly Rate = 131.62 MU(16%USD)/hourDTA= 1,316.22 UM(16%USD) + [Distance in excess of 20 Km.] x 17.54 MU(16%USD)/Km.
§ 102-79.55 Is there a general hierarchy of consideration that agencies must follow in their utilization of space? Yes, Federal agencies must— ( a ) First utilize space in Government-owned and Government-leased buildings; and
( b ) If there is no suitable space in Government-owned and Government-leased buildings, utilize space in buildings under the custody and control of the U.S. Postal Service; and
( c ) If there is no suitable space in buildings under the custody and control of the U.S. Postal Service, agencies may acquire real estate by lease, purchase, or construction, as specified in part 102-73 of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q 
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
          
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1997   
<CASH>                                    3,638
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            21,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                880
<INVENTORY>                                  68
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         33,710
<PP&E>                                    8,262
<DEPRECIATION>                            6,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           39,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    21,775
<BONDS>                                   2,033
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  5,535
<OTHER-SE>                               10,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             39,699
<SALES>                                  44,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         44,477
<CGS>                                    38,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            38,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           1,025
<INCOME-TAX>                                415
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         605
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                605
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .42
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-6608-3] 

Availability of EPA comments prepared May 29, 2000 through June 02, 2000 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202) 564-7167. 

An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 14, 2000 (65 FR 20157). 

## Draft EISs 

ERP No. RD-FRA-A53055-00 Rating EC2, Proposed Rule for the Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings in the United States. 

*Summary:*                     EPA expressed concern regarding the lack of information on funding the quiet zones and requested that more flexibility be provided to those communities that have existing quiet zones.                 

## Final EISs 

ERP No. F-UAF-E11046-FL Tyndall Air Force Base, Implementation, Proposed Conversion of Two F-15 Fighter Squadrons to F-22 Fighter Squadrons, FL. 

*Summary:*                     EPA believes that the proposed action will not pose significant and/or long-term adverse environmental consequences.                 

Dated: June 13, 2000. 

Ken Mittelholtz,

Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 00-15302 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Private  Access,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Daniel L.  Hodges,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 102-38.345 Do we have to withdraw personal property advertised for public sale if a State Agency for Surplus Property wants to buy it?

No, you are not required to withdraw the item from public sale if the property has been advertised.