alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 102-75.755 Which Federal agencies must the disposal agency notify concerning the availability of surplus properties for correctional facility, law enforcement, or emergency management response purposes?

The disposal agency must provide prompt notification to the Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Department of Justice (DOJ), and FEMA that surplus property is available. The disposal agency's notice or notification must include a copy of the landholding agency's Report of Excess Real Property (Standard Form 118), with accompanying schedules.
§ 102-33.345 What are the responsibilities of a State Agency for Surplus Property (SASP) in the donation of Federal Government aircraft parts? When a SASP accepts surplus Federal Government aircraft parts for donation, the SASP must: ( a ) Review donation and transfer documents for completeness and accuracy, and ensure that the certification in § 102-33.340 is included;
( b ) Ensure that when the donee determines the part to be unsalvageable, the donee mutilates the part following the procedures in § 102-33.315; and
( c ) Ensure that the donee retains, maintains, and perpetuates all documentation for serviceable parts (parts intended for flight use).
#### § 102-34.150 How can we get a new license plate code designation?

To obtain a new license plate code designation, write to the: General Services Administration, ATTN: MT, Washington, DC 20405. E-mail: *vehicle.policy@gsa.gov.*
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of NICE Systems Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Haim Shani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



April 28,
2004

| |  | By: | /s/ HAIM SHANIHaim Shani,Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- | ------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
#### § 105-64.502 How do I find out if my record has been disclosed?

You may request an accounting of the persons or agencies to whom your record has been disclosed, including the date and purpose of each disclosure, by writing to the system manager. Mark both the envelope and the letter “Privacy Act Accounting Request”. The system manager will provide the requested information in the same way as that for granting access to records; see Subpart 105-64.2, providing no restrictions to disclosure or accounting of disclosures applies.
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMREP  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned
does hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  December 10, 2009

  /s/ Peter M. Pizza
--------------------------
Peter M. Pizza*
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

  /s/ James Wall
--------------------------
James Wall*

  /s/ Michael P. Duloc
--------------------------
Michael P. Duloc*



--------------
*The  Registrant  is a  holding  company  which  does  substantially  all of its
business   through   two   indirect   wholly-owned   subsidiaries   (and   their
subsidiaries). Those indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries are AMREP Southwest Inc.
("ASW") and Kable Media Services,  Inc.  ("Kable").  James Wall is the principal
executive  officer  of ASW,  and  Michael P.  Duloc is the  principal  executive
officer of Kable. The Registrant has no chief executive  officer.  Its executive
officers  include James Wall,  Senior Vice  President  and Peter M. Pizza,  Vice
President and Chief Financial  Officer,  and Michael P. Duloc, who may be deemed
an executive officer by reason of his position with Kable.
#### § 105-68.910 Agency.

*Agency* means any United States executive department, military department, defense agency, or any other agency of the executive branch. Other agencies of the Federal government are not considered “agencies” for the purposes of this part unless they issue regulations adopting the governmentwide Debarment and Suspension system under Executive orders 12549 and 12689.
§ 105-8.170-7 Investigation/conciliation. ( a ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint, the Official shall complete the investigation of the complaint, attempt informal resolution, and if no informal resolution is achieved, issue a letter of findings. The 180-day time limit may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General. The investigation should include, where appropriate, a review of the practices and policies that led to the filing of the complaint, and other circumstances under which the possible noncompliance with this part occurred.
( b ) The Official may require agency employees to cooperate in the investigation and attempted resolution of complaints. Employees who are required by the Official to participate in any investigation under this section shall do so as part of their official duties and during the course of regular duty hours.
( c ) The Official shall furnish the complainant and the respondent a copy of the investigative report promptly after receiving it from the investigator and provide the complainant and the respondent with an opportunity for informal resolution of the complaint.
( d ) If a complaint is resolved informally, the terms of the agreement shall be reduced to writing and signed by the complainant and respondent. The agreement shall be made part of the complaint file with a copy of the agreement provided to the complainant and the respondent. The written agreement may include a finding on the issue of discrimination and shall describe any corrective action to which the complainant and the respondent have agreed.
( e ) The written agreement shall remain in effect until all corrective actions to which the complainant and the respondent have agreed upon have been completed. The complainant may reopen the complaint in the event that the agreement is not carried out.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

IRA WENZEL and NICOLE WENZEL,

Appellants,

v.

HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-0088

[April 24, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502018CA001703.

George A. Vaka and Robert C. Hubbard of Vaka Law Group, P.L., 

Tampa, and Chase Florin and Hal S. Weitzenfeld of Florin Roebig, Palm 

Harbor, for appellants.

Andrew A. Labbe of Groelle & Salmon, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After a jury trial, the circuit court granted the insurer’s motion for 

judgment in accordance with a prior motion for directed verdict. 

Specifically, the circuit court concluded that the insured failed to provide 

the insurer with prompt notice of the loss. We agree with the insured that 

the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the insurer.

In Restoration Construction, LLC v. SafePoint Insurance Co., 308 So. 3d 

649 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020), we explained that “the issue of whether an 

insured provided ‘prompt’ notice generally presents an issue of fact.” Id. at 

652 (emphasis added) (quoting Himmel v. Avatar Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 257 

So. 3d 488, 492 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)). However, because “[i]n some cases 

[even] a five-day delay could clearly prejudice an insurer’s evaluation of a 

claim[,]” we declined to “create a bright line rule for when notice to an 

insurer is no longer ‘prompt’ [as a matter of law].” Id.; cf. Kroener v. Fla. 

Ins. Guar. Ass’n, 63 So. 3d 914, 916 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (holding that 

notice of loss provided over two years after the date of loss did not 

constitute “prompt” notice as a matter of law).
2

“A trial court may direct a verdict only when the evidence and all 

reasonable inferences fail to prove a plaintiff’s case.” Martinolich v. Golden 

Leaf Mgmt., Inc., 786 So. 2d 613, 614 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (citation 

omitted). “Where evidence is conflicting, or will admit of different 

reasonable inferences, the issue should be submitted to the jury as a 

question of fact, and not passed upon by the judge as a matter of law.” Id.

at 615 (quoting Level v. Getelman, 444 So. 2d 1027, 1028 (Fla. 3d DCA 

1984)). Here, the evidence submitted to the jury was susceptible to 

“different reasonable inferences” as to whether the insurer was prejudiced 

by the delay in providing notice of the loss. Thus, the trial court 

incorrectly set aside the jury’s verdict when it granted the insurer’s motion 

for judgment in accordance with the earlier motion for directed verdict.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order directing verdict for the 

insurer and remand with instructions to reinstate the jury’s verdict.

Reversed and remanded.

CONNER, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 9:22-cv-81780

LETITIA JAMES, individually,

Defendant.

 /

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, by and through his 

undersigned counsel and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby 

voluntarily dismisses his claims in this action against Defendant, LETITIA 

JAMES, without prejudice. 

Dated: January 20, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ R. Quincy Bird

Timothy W. Weber (FBN 86789)

Jeremy D. Bailie (FBN 118558)

R. Quincy Bird (FBN 105746)

WEBER, CRABB & WEIN, P.A.

5453 Central Avenue

St. Petersburg, FL 33710

(t): 727-828-9919/(f): 727-828-9924

timothy.weber@webercrabb.com

lisa.willis@webercrabb.com

jeremy.bailie@webercrabb.com

carol.sweeney@webercrabb.com

quincy.bird@webercrabb.com

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

honey.rechtin@webercrabb.com

Attorneys for President Donald J. Trump

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2023 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32







C.E.O. and C.F.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.








/s/ Paul R. CookPaul R. CookChairman and Chief Executive Officer, andChief Financial OfficerAmerican Consumers, Inc.Date:  October 12, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM ATLANTIC
INTERNATIONAL ENTERTAINMENT, LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                     DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                                67,535
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      1,665,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        (389,919)
<INVENTORY>                                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   6,018,551
<PP&E>                                                               560,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      (163,967)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    10,406,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              1,351,086
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                              12,410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                7
<OTHER-SE>                                                         8,966,201
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      10,406,587
<SALES>                                                            2,426,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   2,426,230
<CGS>                                                                792,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      4,035,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    (538,387)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    11,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   (1,793,082)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        (460,682)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               (1,332,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      (371,448)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (1,703,848)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           (.19)
        

</TABLE>
.. ~ 

SERVED: May 12, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

JETT PRO LINE MAINTENANCE 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 1077 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

We do not anticipate setting this matter for hearing prior to July 1, 2014. 

Accordingly, paragraphs #2 and #3 of the Procedural Order are amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following 

procedural schedule: 

1. On or before July 7, 2014, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses 

to production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve 

a discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for 

resolution in a timely manner; 

2. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after 

July 7, 2014, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The 

specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate 

Order. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 

·._·,._) 
•I 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

John Craig Weller, Respondent's Counsel 

Aerlex Law Group 

2800 281

h Street, Suite 200 

Santa Monica, CA 90405 

TEL: 530-205-9884 

FAX: 530-205-9371 

EMAIL: cweller@aerlex.com 

Sam Nugud, President 

Jett Pro Line Maintenance, Respondent 

8517 Earhart Road, Suite 21 0 

Oakland, CA 94621 

TEL: NOT PROVIDED 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Sam Nugud, President 

Jett Pro Line Maintenance, Respondent 

P.O. Box 3190 

Ontario, CA 91761 

TEL: 909-980-0552 

FAX: 909-980-0699 

ONE COPY 

Autumn Killingham, Complainant's Counsel 

General Attorney, Enforcement Division, 

Office of the Chief Counsel, AGC-600 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7728 FAX: 202-267-5769 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-1077 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2 
The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E: (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

3
**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

 

To the Stockholders and Board 

of NMXS.com, Inc.:

  

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of NMSX.com, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of NMXS.com, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

 

/s/ Epstein, Weber & Conover, PLC

Scottsdale, Arizona

April 13, 2005
§ 102-76.65 What standards must facilities subject to the Architectural Barriers Act meet? ( a ) GSA adopts appendices C and D to 36 CFR part 1191 (ABA Chapters 1 and 2, and Chapters 3 through 10) as the Architectural Barriers Act Accessibility Standard (ABAAS). Facilities subject to the Architectural Barriers Act (other than facilities described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section) must comply with ABAAS as set forth below: ( 1 ) For construction or alteration of facilities subject to the Architectural Barriers Act (other than Federal lease-construction and other lease actions described in paragraphs (a)(2) and (3), respectively, of this section), compliance with ABAAS is required if the construction or alteration commenced after May 8, 2006. If the construction or alteration of such a facility commenced on or before May 8, 2006, compliance with the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) is required.
( 2 ) For Federal lease-construction actions subject to the Architectural Barriers Act, where the Government expressly requires new construction to meet its needs, compliance with ABAAS is required for all such leases awarded on or after June 30, 2006. UFAS compliance is required for all such leases awarded before June 30, 2006.
( 3 ) For all other lease actions subject to the Architectural Barriers Act (other than those described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section), compliance with ABAAS is required for all such leases awarded pursuant to solicitations issued after February 6, 2007. UFAS compliance is required for all such leases awarded pursuant to solicitations issued on or before February 6, 2007.
( b ) Residential facilities subject to the Architectural Barriers Act must meet the standards prescribed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
( c ) Department of Defense and United States Postal Service facilities subject to the Architectural Barriers Act must meet the standards prescribed by those agencies.
[70 FR 67845, Nov. 8, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 52499, Sept. 6, 2006; 72 FR 5943, Feb. 8, 2007]
§ 105-68.305 May I enter into a covered transaction with an excluded or disqualified person? ( a ) You as a participant may not enter into a covered transaction with an excluded person, unless the General Services Administration grants an exception under § 105-68.120.
( b ) You may not enter into any transaction with a person who is disqualified from that transaction, unless you have obtained an exception under the disqualifying statute, Executive order, or regulation.
§ 102-75.1105 What other responsibilities does the Secretary of the Interior have under this delegation of authority? Under this authority, the Secretary of the Interior is responsible for— ( a ) Maintaining proper inventory records, as head of the landholding agency;
( b ) Monitoring the minerals as necessary, as head of the landholding agency, to prevent unauthorized mining or removal of the minerals;
( c ) Securing any appraisals deemed necessary by the Secretary;
( d ) Coordinating with all surface landowners, Federal or otherwise, to prevent unnecessary interference with the surface use;
( e ) Restoring damaged or disturbed lands after removal of the mineral deposits;
( f ) Notifying the Administrator of General Services when the disposal of all marketable mineral deposits is complete;
( g ) Complying with the applicable environmental laws and regulations, including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*); and the implementing regulations issued by the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR part 1500); section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470f); and the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1451 *et seq.*) and the Department of Commerce implementing regulations (15 CFR parts 923 and 930);
( h ) Forwarding promptly to the Administrator of General Services copies of any agreements executed under this authority; and
( i ) Providing the Administrator of General Services with an annual accounting of the proceeds received from leases executed under this authority.