alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 **

*Company*
*Periodic      Report*

|                                   |                                                                    |                                                |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                November 14, 2006 |                                                                    | /s/ STEVEN              S.              ELBAUM |
|                                   | Steven                S. Elbaum*Chief                Executive Officer* |

|                                     |                                                                         |                                                 |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  November 14, 2006 |                                                                         | /s/ David                A.                OWEN |
|                                     | David                    A. Owen*Chief                    Financial Officer* |

----
§ 101-4.110 Remedial and affirmative action and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* If the designated agency official finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, such recipient shall take such remedial action as the designated agency official deems necessary to overcome the effects of such discrimination.
( b ) *Affirmative action.* In the absence of a finding of discrimination on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, a recipient may take affirmative action consistent with law to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation therein by persons of a particular sex. Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted to alter any affirmative action obligations that a recipient may have under Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12086, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264.
( c ) *Self-evaluation.* Each recipient education institution shall, within one year of September 29, 2000: ( 1 ) Evaluate, in terms of the requirements of these Title IX regulations, its current policies and practices and the effects thereof concerning admission of students, treatment of students, and employment of both academic and non-academic personnel working in connection with the recipient's education program or activity;
( 2 ) Modify any of these policies and practices that do not or may not meet the requirements of these Title IX regulations; and
( 3 ) Take appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted or may have resulted from adherence to these policies and practices.
( d ) *Availability of self-evaluation and related materials.* Recipients shall maintain on file for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c) of this section, and shall provide to the designated agency official upon request, a description of any modifications made pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section and of any remedial steps taken pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 607 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 607

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat distributions from 
    publicly traded partnerships as qualifying income of regulated 
             investment companies, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

   Mr. Thomas (for himself, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Houghton, Mr. Crane, Mr. 
    Foley, and Mr. McKeon) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat distributions from 
    publicly traded partnerships as qualifying income of regulated 
             investment companies, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRIBUTIONS FROM PUBLICLY TRADED PARTNERSHIPS TREATED AS 
              QUALIFYING INCOME OF REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 851(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining regulated investment company) is amended 
by inserting ``distributions or other income derived from an interest 
in a publicly traded partnership (as defined in section 7704(b)),'' 
after ``dividends, interest,''.
    (b) Source Flow-Through Rule Not To Apply.--The last sentence of 
section 851(b) of such Code is amended by inserting ``(other than a 
publicly traded partnership (as defined in section 7704(b)))'' after 
``derived from a partnership''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL PASSIVE ACTIVITY RULE FOR PUBLICLY TRADED PARTNERSHIPS 
              TO APPLY TO REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

    Subsection (k) of section 469 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to separate application of section in case of publicly traded 
partnerships) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(4) Application to regulated investment companies.--For 
        purposes of this section, a regulated investment company (as 
        defined in section 851) holding an interest in a publicly 
        traded partnership shall be treated as a taxpayer described in 
        subsection (a)(2) with respect to items attributable to such 
        interest.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to taxable years 
beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.24

                          TREX / USSC AMENDED AGREEMENT
                                  JULY 2, 1998


      USSC will **************************  order (P.O. #386510) on
*************.  In consideration of the following:

1.     USSC makes ***************************************.

2.     At which point USSC and Trex
      ********************************************* **********.

3.     If  USSC and  Trex
      ********************************************************
      ***********************************************************************.

      and Trex agrees to the following:

1.     To require
      ************************************************************.

2.     Any sale made by
      ********************************************************
      ************************************************************************.

3.    Trex agrees to extend USSC's exclusivity (as defined in agreement) until
      *********** ***************.

4. Trex agrees to work in cooperation and good faith with USSC
      ********************* ************************************.

      Agreed upon this 2nd day of July, 1998.


TREX MEDICAL CORPORATION            U.S. SURGICAL CORPORATION

By:     /s/Hal Kirshner
                                   By:     /s/Howard Rosenkrantz___
        Hal Kirshner                       Howard Rosenkrantz
        President & CEO                    President and CEO







TXM #6889
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF TRESCOM INTERNATIONAL, INC. AT DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,149
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,630
<PP&E>                                          39,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,886
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           505
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,429
<SALES>                                        157,641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,641
<CGS>                                          124,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (9,709)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,855)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,855)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,855)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.91)
        


</TABLE>
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  Honorable

George B. Sheppud Comptroller

of' Publlt Aooounts **Auatln, Texan**  **Dear SIPS**  oplxlloa Ilo. o-361

the oplnlm of you v0ul.d

be au ol%&ilal,

vbt?a of theuulteds ey, ha8 boea lost, x~tboutthe axe aa arquind by Artiolo

4365. **of our**  **opiolal lb.o**  **queotlrn mwt**  **be**

**Yours very**  **truly .I**  **J ’**
Exhibit 10.32

 

Supplementary Agreement to Lease

 

Party A (Lessor): Changsha Sunye Electric Co., Ltd.

 

Party B (Lessee): Hunan Yongxiong Asset Management Group Co., Ltd.

 

WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a Housing Lease Contract (hereinafter referred to as the “Original Contract”) as of January 22, 2017; NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties enter into the following supplementary agreement with respect to the relevant matters through friendly consultation:

 

1.                 Under the Original Contract, Party A leased floors 2-10 of the R&D Building in Sunye Industry Park to Party B; now, Party A will lease the first floor of the building to Party B. Lease term: commencing on June 1, 2017 to January 22, 2022; wherein, the rent-free period is June 1, 2017 to June 30, 2017.The rental area of the premises is 1,492.74 square meters. The rent shall be the same as that agreed in the Original Contract.

 

2.                 Commencing May 31, 2017, the rent of floors 2-10 of the R&D Building will be calculated pursuant to Article 2 (III) of the Original Contract.

 

3.                 This Agreement shall become effective upon stamping and signature, and thereafter it will become an integral part of the Original Contract and shall have the same legal force as the Original Contract. Except for those clauses expressly modified by this Agreement, the rest of the Original Contract shall remain in full force and effect. In case of any conflict between this Agreement and the Original Contract, this Agreement shall prevail.

 

4.                 This Agreement is made in quadruplicate, with two copies to be held by each of Party A and Party B.

 

(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank)

 

	
Party A (seal):
    	
Party B (seal): 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Seal of Changsha   Sunye Electric Co., Ltd.
    	
/s/ Seal of Hunan   Yongxiong Asset Management Group Co., Ltd.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Legal   representative or authorized agent: /s/ Ting Zhang
    	
Legal   representative or authorized agent:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date of signature:   May 31, 2017
    	
Date of signature:   May 31, 2017
#### § 102-117.356 What information should I report?

You should report your agency's prior fiscal year transaction level transportation data for freight and cargo, including HHG, and transportation management information. Transportation data that currently is otherwise provided to GSA in compliance with 31 U.S.C. 3726 is not requested. Transaction level transportation data submitted by agencies will remain confidential. Transportation management information should also be reported and should include related environmental information, agency points of contact, and transportation officer warrant and training data.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51217 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. JESUS CASTRO-CATETE Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-1334-ALL Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Castro-Catete raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 30, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51217

2 7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

              DIVERSIFIED SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Entity Name                                                         Jurisdiction

Registrant:

Henry Bros. Electronics, Inc.                                           Delaware

Subsidiaries:

Henry Bros. Electronics, Inc.                                         New Jersey

Viscom Products, Inc.                                                   Delaware

Henry Bros. Electronics, Inc.                                         California

Henry Bros. Electronics, LLC                                             Arizona

National Safe of California, Inc.                                     California

Airorlite Communications, Inc.                                        New Jersey

Securus, Inc.                                                           Colorado

Diversified Security Solutions, Inc.                                    New York

Henry Bros. Electronics, Inc.                                           Colorado
Overview of Evaluation Designs

Handout #2

Crosswalk for Process Evaluation of a Literacy Program

Research 

question

What is collected and how? From whom / data sources? When collected and by 

whom?

How will you analyze the 

data?

Are program 

beneficiaries 

generally 

satisfied with 

the program? 

Why or why 

not?
---

---

Exhibit 8.1

# Significant
Subsidiaries

The
following is a list of all of our significant subsidiaries, including the name, country of
incorporation or residence, the proportion of our ownership interest in each and, if
different, the proportion of voting power held by us.

|Name of Subsidiary                            | Country of Incorporation or
Residence | Percentage of Ownership
Interest
|--------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | --------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Nice Systems Australia PTY Ltd.               | Australia                             | 100%                            
|NICE Systems Canada Ltd.                      | Canada                                | 100%                            
|Nice Systems S.A.R.L.                         | France                                | 100%                            
|NICE Systems GmbH                             | Germany                               | 100%                            
|NICE APAC Ltd.                                | Hong Kong                             | 100%                            
|NICE Systems Kft                              | Hungary                               | 100%                            
|Nice Interactive Solutions India Private Ltd. | India                                 | 100%                            
|Nice Technologies Ltd.                        | Ireland                               | 100%                            
|Actimize Ltd.                                 | Israel                                | 100%                            
|STS Software Systems (1993) Ltd.              | Israel                                | 100%                            
|Actimize Japan KK Limited                     | Japan                                 | 100%                            
|Nice Japan Ltd.                               | Japan                                 | 100%                            
|IEX Corporation BV                            | Netherlands                           | 100%                            
|Nice Systems (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.            | Singapore                             | 100%                            
|Nice Switzerland AG                           | Switzerland                           | 100%                            
|Actimize UK Limited                           | United Kingdom                        | 100%                            
|NICE CTI Systems UK Ltd.                      | United Kingdom                        | 100%                            
|Actimize Inc.                                 | United States                         | 100%                            
|IEX Corporation                               | United States                         | 100%                            
|Nice Systems Inc.                             | United States                         | 100%                            
|Nice Systems Latin America, Inc.              | United States                         | 100%                            



---

---
1

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CR-80173-2-AMC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) 

v. ) 

) 

WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN, ) 

Defendant. ) 

____________________________________) 

JOINT NOTICE OF PREFERRED 

TRIAL DATE

The United States hereby files this joint notice of a preferred trial date, and states as 

follows:

On May 16, 2023, case was before the Court for Calendar Call with jury trial scheduled for 

May 31, 2023. The Court necessitated the trial to be reset to the week of June 12, 2023, or June 

20, 2023, and gave the parties discretion as to which date was preferrable. After consultation 

between the defense and government, all parties request the jury trial begin on June 12, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

MARKENZY LAPOINTE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: s/Gregory Schiller 

Gregory Schiller

Assistant United States Attorney

Florida Bar No. 0648477 

500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

Tel: (561) 209-1045 

Email: gregory.schiller@usdoj.gov 

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 129 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2023 Page 1 of 3
2

By: s/Kyle Reynolds 

Kyle Reynolds 

Trial Attorney

U.S. Dept. of Justice, Criminal Division 

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section 

Court ID # A5502872 

1301 New York Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

Phone: (202) 616-2842 

Email: kyle.reynolds@usdoj.gov 

By: s/William Clayman

William G. Clayman

Trial Attorney

U.S. Dept. of Justice, Criminal Division 

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section 

Court ID # A5502958 

1301 New York Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

Phone: (202) 514-0040 

Email: william.clayman@usdoj.gov 

 

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 129 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2023 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 16, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. 

 s/Gregory Schiller 

 Gregory Schiller

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 129 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2023 Page 3 of 3
#### § 102-75.705 When must the Federal agency notify the disposal agency that an eligible State agency is interested in acquiring the property under section 218?

Federal agencies must notify the disposal agency within 30 calendar days after the date of the surplus notice, if an eligible State agency is interested in acquiring the property under section 218 of the Relocation Act.
<PAGE>

April 22, 1999



Mr. Kieth Sorenson
1387 N. 430 E.
Orem, UT  84097

Dear Kieth:

Upon your exit as President and Chief Executive Officer of Sento Corporation,
effective April 23, 1999, we agree to the following:

-   Your employment agreement with Sento Corporation is canceled.

-   All of your stock options previously granted you are canceled.

-   You are granted 100,000 options, with an exercise price of $1.75 fully
    exercisable currently, with an exercise term that expires April 23, 2001.

-   You are to receive the standard Board of Directors option package
    available to non- employee directors.

-   You will receive $10,000.00 a month for 12 months as a "consultant" to Art
    Coombs as needed. If Sento is acquired between April 23, 1999 and April 23,
    2000, you will receive the remainder of your consulting fees, such that the
    total amount paid you, including the monthly fees you received up to the
    date Sento is acquired, totals $120,000.

-   The amount (originally $100,000) you agreed to pay Sento in case you did
    not remain an employee is hereby forgiven, and you need not repay it. Such
    forgiveness of debt is ordinary income to you and will be reported on form
    1099 or on your W-2. You will be responsible for including such income in
    you personal income tax return for the year ended December 31, 1999.

-   Your Health and Dental benefits will continue for 12 months.

-   Your home to Sento communications link will remain for 12 months.

As an independent contractor, Sento will not be responsible for any of your
payroll taxes or federal insurance. You will be responsible for completing a
W-9 form and returning it to Human Resources with this signed contract. Your
consulting fees will be reported on form 1099.

Please let me know if there are any issues I have not addressed to your
satisfaction, or if you have any other questions.

Sincerely,

Arthur F. Coombs                             /s/ Kieth Sorenson
President / CEO                             ------------------------
Sento Corporation                                Kieth Sorenson