alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 105-70.047 Limitations. ( a ) The Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 provides that a hearing shall be commenced within 6 years after the date on which a claim or statement is made. 31 U.S.C. 3808(a). The statute also provides that the hearing is commenced by the mailing or delivery of the presiding officer's (ALJ's) notice. 31 U.S.C. 3803(d)(2)(B). Accordingly, the notice of hearing provided for in § 105-70.012 herein shall be served within 6 years after the date on which a claim or statement is made.
( b ) If the defendant fails to file a timely answer, service of a notice under § 105-70.010(b) shall be deemed a notice of hearing for purposes of this section.
§ 102-40.140 How do we handle all-terrain vehicles (ATVs)? ( a ) Three-wheeled and four-wheeled all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) can be exchanged with a dealer under the provisions of part 102-39 of this subchapter. Three-wheeled ATVs not exchanged must be mutilated in a manner to prevent operational use and may be sold only as salvage or scrap. Four-wheeled ATVs not exchanged may be offered for transfer and donation only when documented in accordance with §§ 102-40.75 and 102-40.80. In addition, any transfer or donation documentation for four-wheeled ATVs must require the recipient to acknowledge that the recipient will follow regulations and guidelines published by the Consumer Product Safety Commission related to these items, including age recommendations, restrictions on usage, and operator training. Four-wheeled ATVs not exchanged, transferred, or donated may be offered for sale as either salvage or scrap only after they have been mutilated in a manner to prevent operational use. Four-wheeled ATVs must not be released to the public after donee use, nor may they be released to the public after Federal use if the ATVs are not donated.
( b ) A donation transfer document must contain a full description of the actual or potential hazard(s) and restriction(s) associated with the handling, storage, use, transportation or disposal of the item. In addition, the following certification (or an equivalent) must be signed by the donee:
I (We), the undersigned, hereby certify that the donee has knowledge and understanding of the nature of the property hereby donated which requires special handling, and will comply with all applicable Federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations with respect to the care, handling, storage, shipment, and disposal of the property. The donee agrees and certifies that the United States shall not be liable for personal injuries to, disabilities of, or death of the donee or the donee's employees, or any other person arising from or incident to the donation of the property, its use, or its final disposition. Additionally, the donee agrees and certifies to hold the United States harmless from and shall indemnify the United States against any or all debts, liabilities, judgments, costs, demands, suits, actions, or claims of any nature arising from or incident to the donation of the property, its use, or final disposition. Name and title of Donee (print or type) Signature of Donee
EXHIBIT 32.2
                        C.F.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 28, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Paul R. Cook
___________________________________
Paul R. Cook
Executive Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  October 12, 2004


<PAGE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHEL THOMAS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-513

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed June 5, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Charlotte County; George C. Richards,

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Terrence E. Kehoe, Special

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Richard L. Polin, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
§ 105-53.144 Federal Property Resources Service. ( a ) *Creation and authority.* The Federal Property Resources Service (FPRS), headed by the Commissioner, Federal Property Resources Service, was established on July 18, 1978, by the Administrator of General Services to carry out the utilization and disposal functions for real and related personal property.
( b ) *Functions.* FPRS is responsible for utilization surveys of Federal real property holdings; the reuse of excess real property; and the disposal of surplus real property.
( c ) *Regulations.* Regulations pertaining to FPRS programs are published in 41 CFR chapter 1, 41 CFR chapter 101, subchapter H, and 48 CFR chapter 1. Information on availability of the regulations is provided in § 105-53.116
[54 FR 26742, June 26, 1989]
# Comments on: 2021-1511: Broadcom Corporation v. Renesas Electronics
**EXHIBIT 24.5****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mark A.Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full powerof substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical PartnersInternational, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposesas he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of saidattorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.              /s/ James Ken Newman   James Ken Newman
Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR   Document 40-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR   Document 40-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023   Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24


                              HINES HOLDINGS, INC.
                                  DEMAND NOTE
                                  -----------

$2,500,000                                        October 17, 1997


          FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Hines Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Corporation"), hereby promises to pay to Madison Dearborn Capital Partners,
L.P. (the "Payee") on demand, the principal sum of Two Million Five Hundred
Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($2,500,000), together with all accrued and unpaid
interest thereon.

          Interest shall accrue on the unpaid principal balance of this Demand
Note at the rate of 12% per annum, and shall be calculated based on the actual
number of days elapsed and a 365 day year.  The Corporation may repay the
indebtedness represented by this Demand Note at any time, in whole or in part,
without the consent of the Payee and without penalty or premium.  The
Corporation hereby waives notice of presentment.  This Demand Note shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Illinois.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Demand Note as
of the date first written above.

                                    HINES HOLDINGS, INC.


                                    By:   /s/ Paul R. Wood
                                         -------------------------------------
                                    Its:   President
                                         -------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Resources Group, Ltd.(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Richard Dunning, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of his knowledge and belief:

         1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: November 18, 2008                      By: /s/ Richard Dunning
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                                  Online Gaming Systems, Ltd.
#### § 105-72.507 Contract administration.

A system for contract administration shall be maintained to ensure contractor conformance with the terms, conditions and specifications of the contract and to ensure adequate and timely follow up of all purchases. Recipients shall evaluate contractor performance and document, as appropriate, whether contractors have met the terms, conditions and specifications of the contract.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

Shenzhenjiermaoyiyouxiangongsi, Case No.: 0:22-cv-62215-AHS

A Chinese Corporation

Judge: Raag Singhal

Plaintiff,

Magistrate Judge: Alicia O. Valle

v.

The Partnerships And

Unincorporated Associations

Identified On Schedule “A”

Defendants.

__________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 6, 2023, I sent an email to the third party platforms with the

Court’s Order granting TRO Extension and Re-setting the PI Hearing (DE 23).

Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of May, 2023,

Lydia Pittaway

Fla. Bar No.: 0044790

Of Counsel, Ford Banister IP

305 Broadway - Floor 7

New York NY 10007

Telephone: +1 212-500-3268

lpittaway@fordbanister.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

1

Case 0:22-cv-62215-AHS Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2023 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
                                   FDS - 3RD QUARTER
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                              0000006207
<NAME>                             AMREP CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
<CURRENCY>                         U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       JAN-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1
<CASH>                                   4,731
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                           69,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                             99,819
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0
<PP&E>                                  30,631
<DEPRECIATION>                          12,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         213,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0
<BONDS>                                 46,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                   740
<OTHER-SE>                              82,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           213,834
<SALES>                                 76,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       128,184
<CGS>                                   59,738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           96,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       3,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         11,977
<INCOME-TAX>                             4,791
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      7,186
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             7,186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0
        



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38865-38866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15829]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Undergraduate Education; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Undergraduate Education (1214) 
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement Program (CCLI).
    Date/Time: July 17-20 and July 24-27, 2000; 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Rooms 381 (Headquarters Room) Doubletree Hotel, 300 Army-
Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202..
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Drs. Susan H. Hixson, Herbert H. Levitan and 
Myles G. Boylan, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1667/9..
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate CCLI proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information

[[Page 38866]]

concerning individual associated with the proposals. These matters 
are exempt under 5 U.S. C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in 
the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: June 19, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15829 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1555-01-M
#### § 102-38.165 Are the terms and conditions in the offer to sell binding?

Yes, the terms and conditions in the offer to sell are normally incorporated into the sales contract, and therefore binding upon both the buyer and the seller once a bid is accepted.
#### § 102-41.40 How is personal property forfeited?

Personal property that has been seized by a Federal agency may be forfeited through court decree (judicial forfeiture) or administratively forfeited if the agency has specific authority without going through the courts.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the prospectuses included in the
Registration Statements of Childtime Learning Centers, Inc. on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-38325 and 333-33741) of our report dated May 31, 2000, on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of
Childtime Learning Centers, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000 and April
2, 1999, and for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended March 31,
2000, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
Detroit, Michigan
June 13, 2000
#### WILLIAM VON SACHS, as Assignee in Bankruptcy of JOHN F. SCHEPELER, Appellant, *v.*GEORGE C. KRETZ and others, Respondents.

*Statute of Imitations*— effect *cf bankruptcy of debtor on running*of— *Oounterr-alaim, in action by assignee in bankruptcy*— *reply to, by assignee.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, entered upon the report of a referee. This action was brought by an assignee in bankruptcy to foreclose a mortgage. The defendant set up in his answer a counter-claim, to which no reply was made. The plaintiff insisted that the counter-claim was barred by the statute of limitations. As to this, the court at General Term said: “ It is contended by the plaintiff that the statute of limitations is a bar to the defendants’ set-off. It was not barred when the plaintiff became assignee in bankruptcy. He is, in effect, a trustee for the creditors of the bankrupts. The statute of limitations may have barred the right of action against the bankrupts, without affecting a set-off which existed at the time of the adjudication in bankruptcy. For the bankrupt act provides that, in all cases of mutual debts or mutual credits, the balance only shall be allowed or paid. (U. S. Rev. Stat., '§ 5073.) The statute of limitations does not extinguish the debt, but only bars the remedy. The debt may be revived by a subsequent promise without any new consideration. In this case six years had not elapsed, after the defendants’ cause of action accrued, when the adjudication in bankruptcy was made. It does not appear whether the bankrupts were discharged or not. The *96bankrupt act provides that suits against tbe bankrupt shall be stayed, pending the proceedings in bankruptcy. (U. S. Rev. Stat., § 5106.) During the continuance of this statutory prohibition (which, for ought that appears, may still be in force), the statute of limitations did not run. (Code, § 105.)

We think, therefore, that the defendants’ set-off was not barred. *{Pa/rher*v. *Smiborn,*7 Gray, 191.) Nor was the plaintiff at liberty to take that objection. The defense falls within the definition of a counter-claim to which a reply must be put in. The plaintiff did not reply, and therefore admitted the defense. *(Islictm*v. *Dmiclson,*52 N. Y., 237; Code, § 168.) ”

*James K.*Hill, for the appellant. *JoJm H.*Bergen, for the respondents.

Opinion by

Gilbert, J.

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 172-21   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice Regarding Electronic Publication of Notices

June 16, 2000.
    Take notice that effective June 21, 2000, the Commission will begin 
making notices public electronically on a continuous basis on the 
Commission's Issuance Posting System (CIPS).
    Currently the Office of the Secretary, regularly posts copies of 
notices daily at 10 a.m., 3 p.m., and 4:30 p.m. on bulletin boards 
outside of the Public Reference Room.
    Since the Commission has implemented an electronic document 
handling system for notices, the Commission now has the capability of 
making notices public electronically on CIPS on a continuous basis 
throughout the work day. In the past, notices were not added to CIPS 
until after the paper copy was posted on a bulletin board.
    In order to provide notices to the public in a more timely manner, 
effective June 21, 2000, notices will be added to CIPS on a continuous 
basis throughout the day instead of awaiting the paper posting hours. 
The Secretary will continue to post paper copies of notices at 10:00 
a.m., 3:00 p.m., 4:30 p.m., and when necessary after 5 p.m.
    This announcement applies only to notice and not to any other 
Commission issuances.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15785 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
*DECEMBER TERM 1842.

JUDGES PRESENT. *Smith, Baker, Lomax, Christian, Scott, Douglass, Leigh, Wilson, Duncan, Johnston, Fry, Robertson, Clopton, Bayly.*

#### The Commonwealth v. Cook.

December 1842.

Indictment*—Perjury—Insolvents Swearing to Schedule.—Indictment against an insolvent debtor for perjury In swearing to a schedule which did not discover certain debts owing to him. held had on demurrer, for not averring that he well knew and remembered that the omitted debts were then justly due and owing to him.

John Cook was indicted, in the circuit superior court of Pendleton county, at May term 1841, for perjury in falsely swearing to a schedule delivered in by him tinder the act for the relief of insolvent debtors, 1 Rev. Code, ch. 134, *l*31, p. 536, 7. The indictment charged that the defendant did wilfully, corruptly and falsely swear that the schedule contained to the best of his knowledge and remembrance, a full account of all his estate and such debts as were owing to him, when in truth certain debts owing to him (which were described in the indictment) “were not embraced or included in '«the said schedule so subscribed and delivered by the said Cook, and the said Cook then and there well knew and remembered that the said schedule did not contain the said debts.” But there was no averment that the defendant knew or remembered that the debts omitted in the schedule were owing to him.

The defendant demurred to the indictment: whereupon, with his consent, the court adjourned to this court the question, What judgment ought to be given upon the demurrer?

A written argument of the case was submitted by R. Gray for the defendant.

*

See monographic *note*on “Indictments, Informations and Presentments” appended to Boyle v. Com., 14 Gratt. 674.

SMITH, J.,

delivered the resolution of the court.—Without deciding, or meaning to express an opinion, upon any other question raised or arising in this cause, we are all of opinion that the indictment is fatally defective in not averring that the defendant, at the time of giving in the schedule and taking the oath, well knew and remembered that the debts charged to be improperly omitted in the said schedule were then justly due and owing to him. The court is therefore of opinion and doth decide, that the demurrer to the indictment ought to be sustained. _
#### § 102-36.255 What options do we have when unusual circumstances do not allow adequate time for disposal through GSA?

Contact your regional GSA Personal Property Management office for any existing interagency agreements that would allow you to turn in excess personal property to a federal facility. You are responsible for any turn in costs and all costs related to transporting the excess personal property to these facilities.
#### § 102-72.40 What are facility management delegations?

Facility management delegations give Executive agencies authority to operate and manage buildings day to day, to perform individual repair and alteration projects, and manage real property leases.