alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05794]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9063]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Raku: The Cosmos in a Teabowl'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E. O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 
2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``Raku: The Cosmos in a Teabowl,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Los Angeles County Museum of 
Art, Los Angeles, California, from on or about March 29, 2015, until on 
or about June 7, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 9, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-05794 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 205-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2023 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 171-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-78.40 What responsibilities do Federal agencies have when an undertaking adversely affects a historic or cultural property?

Federal agencies must not perform an undertaking that could alter, destroy, or modify an historic or cultural property until they have consulted with the SHPO and the Advisory Council. Federal agencies must minimize all adverse impacts of their undertakings on historic or cultural properties to the extent that it is feasible and prudent to do so. Federal agencies must follow the specific guidance on the protection of historic and cultural properties in 36 CFR part 800.
# TOWER SPECS PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST

**ENVIRONMENTAL:**

□ Check for people, animals, property in the flight vicinity. □ Notify any bystanders or nearby property owner of your intentions. □ If flying in controlled airspace, notify airspace authority of your intentions. □ First Aid / Safety Kit on hand, stocked, readily accessible, and visible to anyone in the area 

## HARDWARE / EQUIPMENT:   VISUALLY INSPECT THE AIRFRAME ** **

□ Cracks (espec ially in high stress areas like joints) □ Loose or damaged screws / fasteners / bands / straps / ties □ Loose or damaged wiring □ Loose or damaged connections (solder, plugs, etc) □ Inspect prop mounts & screws & apply slight counter pressure on arms to ch eck for loosened construction □ Battery/batteries fully charged, properly seated & secured □ Remove props and test fail -safe behavior (if applicable) □ Props are smooth and free of damage/defect (check blade, surface, & hub) □ Tighten prop adapters (careful not to over tighten which may damage prop) □ Ensure voltage alarm is connected □ Ensure arming/idle timeout is properly configured (6 -15 seconds is generally acceptable) □ Check whether the right model is selected in the transmitter (if applicable) □ Check your RC transmitter shows the right range and centering for all sticks □ If desired, perform range test


## PRE**-FLIGHT:**   POWER UP ** **

□ Batteries charged & secured □ Position quad in a level, safe location for takeoff □ If using onboard video recorder, turn on camera □ All transmitter controls move freely in all directions □ All transmitter trims in its neutral position □ All transmitter switches in correct position (typically away) □ Transmitter throttle to zero □ Radio transmitter on □ Connect/ power on battery to airframe □ Ensure led indicators & audible tones are all correct (e.g., GPS and Compass are properly calibrated) □ Timer on (if applicable) □ Scan for nearby people or animals □ Stand clear - audibly, loudly announce the word "CLEAR!" □ Arm flight controller 

### **PRE TAKEOFF **

□ Increase throttle slightly listening for any abnormalities □ Short 20-30 second hover at 3-5 feet (listen for any weird vibrations or anything that sounds loose)
EXHIBIT
32.2


C.F.O.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE
ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
August 29, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.





/s/
Paul R. Cook


Paul R.
Cook


Executive
Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)


American
Consumers, Inc.








Date:  October
12, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gilbert Hu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.

|                        |  |        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: December 29, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/ GILBERT HU         
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Gilbert Hu             
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04703**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 04703\04703_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04703\04703_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04703\04703_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04703\Certification Statement Plant ID 04703.pdf Plant certification statement x x 04703\Supplemental Documents\04703_A5-2 - Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04703\Supplemental Documents\04703_A5-2 Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04703\Supplemental Documents\04703_A5-3 Hines Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04703\04703_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04703\04703_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
#### JOHN HERRLICH, Respondent, *v.*MATTHEW T. BRENNAN, Sheriff of the City and County of New York, Appellant.

*Notice*— of *fraudulent intent of vendor*— what *sufficient to establish.*

Appeal' from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The defendant levied upon certain articles under and by virtue of an execution against one Pickhardt, and sold them.

The plaintiff, claiming to have purchased them in good faith, and for a valuable consideration, brought this action to recover the damages he sustained by the unlawful seizure. Pickhardt, on the 30th of August, 1872, sold the property to the plaintiff, taking notes for the consideration, extending over a term of nearly two years, but payable at different periods during that time. The plaintiff also agreed to pay what was due to the workmen then in the employment of the vendor. On the 3d of September, 1872, Pickhardt also assigned to the plaintiff all the outstanding debts due and amounting to about $1,500. For these the plaintiff paid by discharging debts due from Pickhardt. On the 9th of January, 1873, the sheriff made the levy already mentioned.

The court at General Term said: “The defendant’s counsel requested the justice presiding, to charge, among other things, ‘That to establish *notice to a purchaser*of the fraudulent intent of his vendor, it is sufficient to prove that the facts and circumstances are such as ought reasonably to have excited his suspicion and led him to inquiry,’ and this was refused- The case was one to which *195the principle involved in the request was applicable, and the request itself was good law.

“The case of *WilUámson*v. *Brown*(15 N. Y., 354) establishes this proposition. If the facts and circumstances are such as ought to have excited suspicion and led to inquiry, the purchaser is regarded as having received notice of a fraudulent intent and required to investigate, and on the trial to explain or in some way overcome the effect of the notice thus given. Purchasers, under the circumstances suggested, cannot shut them eyes and shield themselves by proof of the payment of a consideration. They further and perfect the wrongful intent of the debtor when they assist him to dispose of his property.”

*L. S. Chatfield,*for the appellant. *F. It. Coudert,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Beady, J.;

Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J., concurred.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

ERICA WHITE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HUMANA INC., 

Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

Case No. ___________________ 

DECLARATION OF ANDREA HARVEL 

I, Andrea Harvel, declare as follows: 

1. My name is Andrea Harvel. I am over 18 years of age and I have personal 

knowledge of the facts contained in this Declaration and have reviewed the complaint in this 

action, the plan attached to the complaint and the records relevant to this Declaration as set forth 

herein. 

2. I am the Commercial Resolution Director, Grievance & Appeal Operations, at 

Humana Insurance Company. 

3. During the relevant time period of September, 2021, Plaintiff Erica White was a 

member of an employer group plan sponsored by White, White & Associates (“Employer”), and 

administered by Humana Medical Plan, Inc. 

4. I have reviewed the Certificate of Coverage attached as Exhibit A to the Complaint. 

The Certificate contains the federal notices that Humana Medical Plan, Inc. includes with plans 

governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. 

Case 1:22-cv-24030-RKA Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2022 Page 1 of 2
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true 

and correct to the best of my information and belief. 

Executed on this 12th day of December, 2022, in Louisville, Kentucky. 

_

_______________________ 

Andrea Harvel 

Case 1:22-cv-24030-RKA Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 102-74.130 When a prospectus is required, can GSA prepare a prospectus for a reimbursable alteration project?

Yes, if requested by a Federal agency, GSA will prepare a prospectus for a reimbursable alteration project.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                                 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                      1,000,000
<CURRENCY>                                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                    JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                           1
<CASH>                                                                   51
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           932
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             30
<INVENTORY>                                                             491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      1,565
<PP&E>                                                                1,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        4,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 1,954
<BONDS>                                                               1,557
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                             (340)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          4,081
<SALES>                                                               2,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      2,950
<CGS>                                                                 2,181
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         2,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          6
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       96
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         167
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             60
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     107
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          23
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             84
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             0
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Andrew B. Clubok, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having considered 

the Motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

The Motion is GRANTED. Andrew B. Clubok may appear and participate in this action 

on behalf of Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification 

of all electronic filings to Andrew B. Clubok, at Andrew.Clubok@lw.com.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at , Florida, this 

day of .

 

United States District Judge

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 42-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 1 of 1
319P15

#### State v. Carlton Washington Tomlinson

1. Defs Motion for Temporary Stay

1. Allowed 09/10/2015

Dissolved 11/05/2015

2. Defs Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

2. Denied

3. Def’s PDR (COA14-1016)

3. Denied
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7319

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LARRY RAY BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CR-95-79, CA-96-1020-R)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Ray Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed

in forma pauperis, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Brown, Nos. CR-95-79; CA-96-1020-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Omer:

I spoke to Ben Watson of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s Sacramento office, and he indicated that a

Section 7 ESA consultation, if needed, should be initiated by the Federal agency, not the project

proponent. Further, he added that it was possible for EPA to make a “no effect” determination, which

would preclude the need for a consultation. We believe that a “no effect” determination would be

appropriate for this project, given that satisfactory completion of the air permitting and CEQA processes,

which would confirm that the project is not expected to have any significant or unacceptable effects

outside of SPI’s existing industrial facility, are required to proceed with the project. In addition, a biological

and wetland screening study was conducted in 2007 for the previously proposed project, which, as far as

potential impacts to special-status plant or wildlife species, is almost identical to the currently proposedproject. Please let me know if you would like to review the report documenting the study findings, or if you

need any other additional information.

Thank you, and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, or wish to discuss this

further.

Eric Aibright I Senior Manager

C’:cn w\v.envrcorp,com ealbright@environcorp.com

17C2 33 Av. W Se #3C Lynwocd, W.A 98036

main: 425.412.1800 fax: 425.672.1840 direct: 425.412.1804 cell: 206.909.0591

&Z Rcuce vste Reese cosdr te eaviroame:t befo-e orintng t!,is e-mi.

This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected by

law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use ofthe Addressee(s). Unless you are the

addressee or authorized agent ofthe addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose

to anyone the message or any information contained within. If you have received this message in

error, please contact the sender by electronic reply to emai1environcorp.com and immediatelydelete all copies ofthe message.
§ 207.175a Carlson's Landing Dam navigation lock, Withlacoochee River, Fla.; use, administration, and navigation. ( a ) The owner of or agency controlling the lock shall not be required to operate the navigation lock except from 7 a.m. to 12 noon, and from 1 p.m. to 7 p.m., during the period of February 15 through October 15 each year; and from 8 a.m. to 12 noon, and from 1 p.m. to 6 p.m., during the remaining months of each year. During the above hours and periods the lock shall be opened upon demand for the passage of vessels.
( b ) The owner of or agency controlling the lock shall place signs, of such size and description as may be designated by the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville, Fla., at each side of the lock indicating the nature of the regulations in this section.
[30 FR 6161, May 1, 1965]
§ 102-193.20 What are the specific agency responsibilities for records management? You must follow both GSA regulations in this part and NARA regulations in 36 CFR chapter XII to carry out your records management responsibilities. To meet the requirements of this part, you must take the following actions to establish and maintain the agency's records management program: ( a ) Assign specific responsibility to develop and implement agencywide records management programs to an office of the agency and to a qualified records manager.
( b ) Follow the guidance contained in GSA handbooks and bulletins and comply with NARA regulations in 36 CFR chapter XII when establishing and implementing agency records management programs.
( c ) Issue a directive establishing program objectives, responsibilities, authorities, standards, guidelines, and instructions for a records management program.
( d ) Apply appropriate records management practices to all records, irrespective of the medium (e.g., paper, electronic, or other).
( e ) Control the creation, maintenance, and use of agency records and the collection and dissemination of information to ensure that the agency: ( 1 ) Does not accumulate unnecessary records while ensuring compliance with NARA regulations for adequate and proper documentation and records disposition in 36 CFR parts 1220 and 1228.
( 2 ) Does not create forms and reports that collect information inefficiently or unnecessarily.
( 3 ) Reviews all existing forms and reports (both those originated by the agency and those responded to by the agency but originated by another agency or branch of Government) periodically to determine if they can be improved or canceled.
( 4 ) Maintains records economically and in a way that allows them to be retrieved quickly and reliably.
( 5 ) Keeps mailing and copying costs to a minimum.
( f ) Establish standard stationery formats and styles.
( g ) Establish standards for correspondence to use in official agency communications, and necessary copies required, and their distribution and purpose.
#### § 105-64.205 Who will provide access to my record?

The system manager will make a record available to you on request, unless special conditions apply, such as for medical, law enforcement, and security records.