alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Wyoming Nitrate Contribution to Arches/Canyonlands

Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

CANY1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 22 WY 0.0015045 0 0.0013955 5.00E-05 0.0005364 0.0034864

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Nitrate at Arches/Canyonlands = 0.003 divided by 0.2, or 2%

Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

CANY1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 22 WY 0.0176773 0.0001273 0.0082136 0.0003727 0.0042773 0.0306682

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Nitrate at Arches/Canyonlands = 0.03 divided by 0.9, or 3%
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>                           0000817647
<NAME>                          AMERICAN PAD AND PAPER COMPANY OF DELAWARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          13,200                  13,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,115                  62,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,828)                 (1,828)
<INVENTORY>                                     97,212                  97,212
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,136                 195,136
<PP&E>                                         143,927                 143,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,386)                (11,386)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 520,413                 520,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,153                  91,153
<BONDS>                                        130,000                 130,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           274                     274
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,175                  94,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   520,413                 520,413
<SALES>                                        173,606                 407,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               173,606                 407,813
<CGS>                                          137,569                 323,317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,881                 360,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (408)                 (1,179)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   111                     261
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (9,940)                (34,972)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,193                  13,641
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,268                   5,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,925                   7,748
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (18,695)                (19,995)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,770)                (12,247)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 109-50.200 Scope of subpart.

This subpart provides guidance on providing gifts of excess and/or surplus education related and Federal research equipment to elementary and secondary educational institutions or nonprofit organizations for the purpose of improving math and science curricula or conducting of technical and scientific education and research activities.
#### § 102-85.85 What if a customer agency participates in a consolidation?

If an agency agrees to participate in a consolidation upon expiration of an OA, the relocation expenses will be addressed in the new OA negotiated by GSA and the customer agency. The customer agency generally pays such costs.
**OFFiCE.OF THE**  **ATTORNEY GENERAL**  **OF TEXAS** 

**i AUSTIN** 

&mrabla k, t. Yitohell 

### Chalraen Taxa@ **state** 

### Board of R&tration Sor prof068i0~81 

### Cngineer8 AwtlA, TOxa8

tt.AtiOA t0

prorlesloA6 **or** 0. 8. l66 

### bgl8latUr8, POW ond6whioh hat. beSA doot rrglrtratloa fee8 ati f686iOA61 bgiAtJW6, io
t 8. B. 199, Iuprm, protide 66

8Fe 

### tha Stateot 

### Terrahar heretofter 

### aeouaulstod fund6 for certain

ot the United Stat66 or **berirac Protid6d.**  hou6rer. that ahen 6U ti3# 01:66J OtkI?-ri@dldOii6 6h61l - pamilt t&a **stat8** to aaqoire the nwer6ery labor rad matuial6’, the obligotlonr ot the **Unit&** States in thloh said tunAI are latest44 shall be 601d ornd60-4 6A4 tbr p?668046Of 6614 obligatioru 6haU **bo** UOed tor **th6** gut fPn4r wer6 0rIgIa aU~

nut c 66 

### for rhloh 

### the rho4 or l olleeted.~
Th6 PQWO68 of 8. B. No. 199 I6 616ul~ rxpreored u SeotIoB l there&. 1% aQtbriM6 M
r rormwnt which ho heretotore or uy c d8partaant ot the State or l l @rtdB **enafter rooopttlrt6**  tUd6

**PUr** rohau of rater r oel inrolrl~gth6 6AplOpat of **labor** or th6 ii ala, to invrrt 6och l 006sulate4tundr IB Detenoe Ad6 **Or** OthU **obligtloa6 Of**  th8 uAit,d **at&66 Uh6a**  **it 16**  **mob16** $6 oarZy OUt cl~6b'~purpo.o kOau66 of IAabIlitttoobtalq the nogoa- #err &bOv QI **Aatex!ialr.**

A 

### 6uotul aaalnatloa et 8. 

### B. Uo. Vl, 8opeolaU~ gOotIon 9 thereot,ArtioloS87la, VoraoA'6Clvll Statutor, bsr &4 a6 to th0 8oQOlaOiOntha8 aoA6 of tho iuadr a08 ln t?,te Stato 

### T’TO~OQW

to tho errdltet 

### the V&oteorIonalgagInoer6* ti4,w or whI6h uy hereatterbe oredltod to 6ai4 fuad, **wero** 

### or will b0 600walato4 for aAy porpooo other tb6A f6r the 64AIAI6tratloa **6f 66i4**  **6tatuto. -FO**  16 **Mthiry; iA**  **tk 6t6tQt6**  t&&t WOO **$8.** 4IoatOr that th0 Boar4Aar **6OOUS6htO** AOAOt 6QuOOtOb **66drr** tt6 tara8 tar any purwoo 1Arolti~gtb6 l rploynmt oi labor or the purehaoe 0r Laterlalo, **0t** 8. B. 

### 199. ouoh a8 18 OontOmplated by the prorloion8

to your Boarb The tortf-olghth Leglrlattmo~640 6~ 6pproprI6tIon

in 

### the ~QB of #dO,OOO, l ttootfvogeptorebor 1, 194B, ***oat** ot fu~48 6ow OIL hand **tor** tho l

ro6tloa ot 6 llbrar for 

### the Reglrtore4ProtoooIozml .Iro 6haU be 0% F aeor6 of Toxar. No part 0c thlr 

### tund 

### or rO8trlot

r abd tOr a bQ l.diRgmo Th8rO w0 Other lh.%tatiOM 0~6 gover6iAgthe **6xpoaditQre** of **thir** ARprOptiatioA with whlah M UO not here OoAaorA64.

It I6 l

pparoat that (Loa0Of "the fUnda BOW.OA hand” **wore** l oauaalatod **rot the**  **purpooo** oi rotabllohIAg6 llbrarr or **libruier, tor**  **tb** reaooo 

### thd 6uOh **6 pup666**  **i6 not**  **6Utborh6d ;;**  **fLi. Ho.**  **T4,** nor br **ury** other **rtatute that**  **we hato**  **boa** 6ble

811100**the ab0TO**  watioAo4 l pprO&?FiatiOA

I6 linitrd **t0** vu6 

### LW 0a hana*UI& nro 

### not 6ooPruZato4tor the l

### otabllahBentot 6 library or li&~Ior, it 4006 Boot oom WItkin the tea6 ot 8. B. 199.‘-i

;,,a rroa rant we harm HLQ , at aeoeooari~ **rouow6**

&t your quertlonmart **be** enswore **b** the negot;ve. ‘

. 

### 330

Toorr vary truly,
* Circuit Judge of the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

** Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-41104

FELECHIA JONES; MARY WELLS; NATALIE ARLINE; BEVERLY COOPER, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. KINSEL MOTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal From the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas

98-CV-1925 September 11, 2000 Before WOOD * , DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: ** AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION 

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Luis Marquez) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Luis Marquez.

Dated this 14th day of August 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2023 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-62385-CIV-SINGHAL

ANNETTE SYSEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

EMPOWER BRANDS, LLC, and

TARGET CORPORATION,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff

(DE [16]) and the Report and Recommendation (DE [20]) of the Magistrate Judge 

recommending that the motion be granted. The Court has reviewed the entire file and 

record and has made a de novo review of the issues. No objections to the magistrate 

judge’s Report and Recommendation having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (DE [20]) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand 

(DE [16]) is GRANTED. This case is remanded to the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. All pending motions are hereby 

DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 7th day of 

August 2023.

Copies furnished counsel via CM/ECF

Case 0:22-cv-62385-AHS Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 109-50.101 Applicability.

This subpart is applicable to DOE offices and designated contractors.
#### § 109-1.5108-5 Administratively controlled items.

No formal property management records are required to be maintained for this category of personal property, which includes such items as those controlled for calibration or maintenance purposes, contaminated property, tool crib items, and equipment pool items. Various control records can be employed to help safeguard this property against waste and abuse, including purchase vs. use information, tool crib check-outs, loss and theft reports, calibration records, disposal records, and other similar records. Control techniques would include physical security, custodial responsibility, identification/marking, or other locally established control techniques.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-
21189 and No. 333-07053 of Helisys, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our 
report dated October 29, 1998 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and 
includes an explanatory paragraph indicating that there are matters that raise 
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern), 
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Helisys, Inc. for the year 
ended July 31, 1998.

STONEFIELD JOSEPHSON, INC.

Santa Monica, California

October 29, 1998
§ 128-1.5005-2 Redelegations of authority. ( a ) The authorities delegated by the Assistant Attorney General for Administration to heads of bureaus may, in turn, be redelegated as necessary to enable personal property management functions to be performed at the organizational level best equipped to handle such functions, unless otherwise prohibited by this regulation.
( b ) Such redelegations can be made without the specific approval of the Assistant Attorney General for Administration to deputies, principal administrative officers, heads of field offices and installations and their respective deputies. Such redelegations shall not conflict with the duties or responsibilities assigned to the PMO, or PC under the JPMR.
( c ) Existing delegations of authority by the Assistant Attorney General for Administration in matters of personal property management which are not covered in this section shall continue in effect until modified or revoked.
( d ) Redelegations of authorities made in accordance with this section shall be in writing and shall be made available for audits, surveys, or as otherwise appropriate.
#### § 101-31.200 Cross-reference to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (48 CFR chapter 1, parts 1-99).

For guidance see Federal Acquisition Regulation (e.g., Subpart 7.5, and parts 37 and 46) (48 CFR Subpart 7.5, and parts 37 and 46).

[64 FR 34734, June 29, 1999]
# Comments on: 23-1092: INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC v. IRACING.COM MOTORSPORT SIMULATIONS, LLC [ORDER], Nonprecedential
#### § 102-75.1020 Are public bodies ever required to pay the disposal costs associated with donated property?

Yes, any public body receiving donated improvements on land or related personal property must pay the disposal costs associated with the donation, such as dismantling, removal, and the cleaning up of the premises.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7094

JAMES STEWART HODGES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-99-1437-WMN) Submitted: January 31, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Martin Stanley, Jr., DAVIS & STANLEY, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Larry D. Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:James Stewart Hodges appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against the United States under the Federal TortClaims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hodges v. United States , No. CA-99-1437-WMN (D. Md. May 11, 2000).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
consolidated financial statements at August 31, 1996 and for the twelve month
period ended August 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,145,514
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,408,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (200,814)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,188,500
<PP&E>                                      10,542,291
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,947,306)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,623,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,869,157
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,892
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,332,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,623,326
<SALES>                                     11,659,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,892,215
<CGS>                                        5,621,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,621,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,945,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               103,849
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             326,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,894,268
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,064,327
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            829,941
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   829,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
        

</TABLE>
#### § 102-74.70 Are commercial vendors and nonprofit organizations required to operate vending facilities by permit or contractual arrangement?

Commercial vendors and nonprofit organizations must operate vending facilities, including cafeterias, under a contractual arrangement with Federal agencies.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on December 10, 1999, Salsbury Chemicals, Inc., 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616-3466, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of amphetamine (1100) and by letter dated March 14, 2000, for registration to bulk manufacture methylphenidate (1724), basic classes of controlled substances listed in Schedule II.

The firm plans to manufacture amphetamine and methylphenidate for distribution as bulk product.

Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration.

Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than August 21, 2000.

      ( print page 38861)    
Dated: June 7, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcemnt Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-15690 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M