alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.27


September 17, 2019


Rick Etskovitz


378 Dewsbury Place


Blue Bell,
PA 19422


Dear Rick:


As you know,
Astea International Inc. ("Astea" or the “Company") has accepted an offer from IFS AB to pursue a
transaction, which if consummated, will result in the acquisition of all of the Company's capital stock by IFS AB or a newly
created, wholly-owned subsidiary of IFS AB (the "Transaction").


 


Given your position
at Astea, you are a key employee and your continued presence and participation is important to complete the Transaction. Accordingly,
as it would be in the best interests of the Company to recognize the value of your past services to Astea and to incentivize and
encourage your active participation in continuing to work for Astea in order to complete the Transaction, Astea is offering to
pay you bonus compensation if you do not voluntarily terminate your employment with the Company and remain employed until the closing
of the Transaction has occurred.


 


To provide
incentive for you to remain employed with Astea until closing of the Transaction, you are eligible to be paid a bonus (the "Transaction
Bonus") in the amount of $100,000, less applicable withholding taxes, if you sign this letter, the Transaction closes, and
you remain employed in good standing with Astea through the closing of the Transaction. The Retention Bonus will be paid as part
of closing on the Transaction by or on behalf of Astea; IFS AB has no obligation to pay you the Transaction Bonus.


 


As a condition of
being entitled to receive the Transaction Bonus, you will continue to perform the duties of your position during the Transaction
process, including any additional duties that will relate to the Transaction. You will forfeit your right to the Transaction Bonus
if you voluntarily resign your employment (or are terminated for cause) before the closing of the Transaction.


 


The Transaction Bonus
is separate and apart from and does not affect any other benefits which you may have from and with the Company.


 


I hope that
these enhancements will help alleviate some of the uncertainty that you may have surrounding developments at Astea. I trust that
it will also help to motivate you to continue to maintain a high level of performance as we go through this period of change and
transition. I look forward to you continuing with Astea, and I hope that you will assist in making the transition as smooth as
possible.


If you have
any questions, please contact me. A signed and dated copy of this letter agreement must be returned to me on or before September
30, 2019, in order for you to be eligible to receive the Transaction Bonus.


 


Sincerely,


/s/ Zack Bergreen 


 


Accepted
and Agreed By:


/s/
Rick Etskovitz  Date: 9/24/19
§ 102-37.450 What agreements must a donee make? Before a SASP may release property to a donee, the donee must agree to the following conditions: ( a ) The property is acquired on an “as is, where is” basis, without warranty of any kind, and it will hold the Government harmless from any or all debts, liabilities, judgments, costs, demands, suits, actions, or claims of any nature arising from or incident to the donation of the property, its use, or final disposition.
( b ) It will return to the SASP, at its own expense, any donated property: ( 1 ) That is not placed in use for the purposes for which it was donated within 1 year of donation; or
( 2 ) Which ceases to be used for such purposes within 1 year after being placed in use.
( c ) It will comply with the terms and conditions imposed by the SASP on the use of any item of property having a unit acquisition cost of $5,000 or more and any passenger motor vehicle or other donated item. (Not applicable to SEAs.)
( d ) It agrees that, upon execution of the SASP distribution document, it has conditional title only to the property during the applicable period of restriction. Full title to the property will vest in the donee only after the donee has met all of the requirements of this part.
( e ) It will comply with conditions imposed by GSA, if any, requiring special handling or use limitations on donated property.
( f ) It will use the property for an authorized purpose during the period of restriction.
( g ) It will obtain permission from the SASP before selling, trading, leasing, loaning, bailing, cannibalizing, encumbering or otherwise disposing of property during the period of restriction, or removing it permanently for use outside the State.
( h ) It will report to the SASP on the use, condition, and location of donated property, and on other pertinent matters as the SASP may require from time to time.
( i ) If an insured loss of the property occurs during the period of restriction, GSA or the SASP (depending on which agency has imposed the restriction) will be entitled to reimbursement out of the insurance proceeds of an amount equal to the unamortized portion of the fair market value of the damaged or destroyed item.
<PAGE>

BESTWAY, INC.                                                          FORM 10-Q

                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                OF BESTWAY, INC.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended April 30, 2003 of Bestway,
Inc. (the "Issuer").

I, Beth A. Durrett, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to
the best of my knowledge:

         (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
              U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Issuer.

Date: June 16, 2003                        By:    /s/ Beth A. Durrett
                                               ------------------------------
                                                      Name: Beth A. Durrett

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 16th day of June, 2003.

/s/ JEANNE A. ANDRESS
-------------------------------------

Name: Jeanne A. Andress
     --------------------------------
Title: Notary Public

My commission expires: 04/13/2006
                      ---------------
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 23

- 00586

- CV

In re Naima Ham

OR I GINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

T he petition for writ of mandamus is denied

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8 (a)

.

_________ _

_

_

______________________________

Ros a Lopez Theofanis , Justic e

B efore Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis

Filed: October 20, 2023
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Philip McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.





By:

/s/    PHILIP MCDERMOTTName: Title:

Philip McDermott Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

             FIFTH ADDENDUM TO COLLATERAL SECURITY AGREEMENT DATED
            NOVEMBER 1, 2001 BETWEEN ACTRADE CAPITAL, INC. AND XETEL
                         CORPORATION (THE "AGREEMENT")

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     A.  Effective April 12, 2002, Paragraph 3 (iii) of the Agreement is hereby
         modified to read as follows:

     "3. GENERAL TERMS OF THIS SECURITY AGREEMENT. The parties agree that the
     following terms and conditions shall govern this Security Agreement:

     (iii)    Upon default in payment of (i) sum of $25,000 on or before April
              12, 2002, (default charges for extending the debt to June 30,
              2002), (ii) the Restructured TADs, less any payments made, on or
              before June 30, 2002, or (iii) any facts otherwise constituting a
              default under this Agreement, Actrade shall immediately notify
              Maker in writing that a default has been declared. Maker shall
              have two (2) business days to cure the default. If not cured
              within such period then, without further notice to Maker, Actrade
              shall take all steps necessary to effect enforcement and
              collection of the collateral security described herein in
              Schedule A.

     B.  In all other respects the aforesaid Agreement and each and every
         provision thereof shall remain in full force and effect, without change
         or modification thereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS ADDENDUM TO THE
AGREEMENT UNDER THEIR SEALS AS OF APRIL 12, 2002.

ACTRADE CAPITAL, INC.                     XETEL CORPORATION


By: /s/ RICHARD COUZZI                    By: /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
   ----------------------------------         --------------------------------
   Richard Couzzi                             NAME: [ILLEGIBLE]
   Vice President, Credit & Collections       TITLE: CEO
#### § 102-38.110 Who approves our determinations to conduct negotiated sales?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67866, Aug. 22, 2024.

The head of your agency (or his/her designee) must approve all negotiated sales of personal property.
#### § 102-37.600 When does title to a surplus donated vehicle change hands?

Title to the vehicle rests with the holding agency until the SF 97 is signed by the donee upon receipt of the surplus motor vehicle. (If applicable under the terms of the donation, the title will be conditional until the end of the period of restriction).
#### § 102-80.140 What is meant by “room of origin”?

Room of origin means an area of a building where a fire can be expected to start. Typically, the size of the area will be determined by the walls, floor, and ceiling surrounding the space. However, this could lead to unacceptably large areas in the case of open plan office space or similar arrangements. Therefore, the maximum allowable fire area should be limited to 200 m2 (2000 ft2), including intervening spaces. In the case of residential units, an entire apartment occupied by one tenant could be considered as the room of origin to the extent it did not exceed the 200 m2 (2000 ft2) limitation.
From: Kevin Ruskin

To: FLSDdb_efile Scola

Subject: Court Docket No.: 22-20521-CR

Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 7:14:53 PM

CAUTION - EXTERNAL: 

Dear Judge Scola,

I am writing in regard to the upcoming bond hearing for Theodore Farnsworth. I am

an investor in another of Mr. Farnsworth's publicly traded companies, Vinco Ventures,

in which he has continued the same alleged fraudulent practices of materially false

and misleading representations which have caused the company to decrease over

90% in value and become de-listed from the NASDAQ exchange costing investors

millions of dollars.

A group of Vinco investors is currently suing Mr. Farnsworth in NV civil courts (state

of incorporation) for his fraudulent conduct, and may soon be taking action in federal

courts. We believe it is imperative that Mr. Farnsworth remain in custody which will

constrain his ability to conduct more fraudulent acts and humbly request that you

deny bond for Mr. Farnsworth at this hearing and remand him to custody as a matter

of public safety until his trial can be completed.

As further evidence of continued wrongdoing, Mr. Farnsworth in a 4/6/23 NY Times

article claimed to be "operating" the National Enquirer, though the purchase deal had

not been completed and subsequently fell apart. See

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/06/business/media/national-enquirer-hush-moneytrump.html and A publicly traded media venture with ties to MoviePass' former

chairman has been suspended from Nasdaq and its stock is in free fall

A publicly traded media venture with ties to

MoviePass' former chairman ...

Ashley Rodriguez

Vinco Ventures became a meme stock in 2021 after teaming

up with the ex-chairman of MoviePass and touting acquis...

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 68 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2023 Page 1 of 2
Sincerely,

Kevin Ruskin

CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution

when opening attachments or clicking on links.

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 68 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2023 Page 2 of 2
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Starwalker PR LLC ) ) Under ContractNo. W91B4N-09-D-5005 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61520

Richard L. Moorhouse, Esq. JozefS. Przygrodzki, Esq.

Greenberg Traurig, LLP McLean, VA Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney Frank A. March, Esq.

Trial Attorney OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL ON THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FORLACK OF JURISDICTION Thegovernment moves to dismiss ASBCA No. 61520* for lack of jurisdiction because, it says, the contracting officer never received appellant's September 14, 2017 claim, which is attached to appellant's complaint. 

### It is up to appellant to demonstrate by a preponderance ofthe evidence that we havejurisdictionby showing that it first presented its claim to the contracting officer. 

### See Rover Construction Co., ASBCA No. 60703, 17-1 BCA 

### ,i 36,682 at 178,613; 

### KingAerospace, Inc., ASBCA No. 57057, 16-1 BCA 

### ,i 36,451 at 177,653. Appellant's response to the motion points to an email addressed to the contracting officer and others that references an "attached" certified claim; that response, however, does not provide the referenced attachment. In addition, the contracting officerhas declared under oath that she did not receive the claim (gov't mot., ex. 3). Finally, appellant's response does not request that we deny the government's motion; it says that we should stay proceedings to give the contracting officer (who, appellant says, "nowhas a complete copy ofthe September 14, 2017 claim") time to

* This decision only pertains to ASBCA No. 61520, which is consolidated with ASBCANo. 61557.

# I 

# l decide the claim (app. resp. at 2). The preponderance ofthe evidence before us is not 

### that appellant first presented its claim to the contracting officer. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Dated: August 1, 2018



### I

### concur in result

~·· 

### ~Jk~~S~~CKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I

### concur in result 

# c~4
REBA PAGE Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

2 Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I 

### concur in result

J. REID PROUTY Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals


### I concur 

# D~zL DONALDE.KINNER~ Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion andDecision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 61520, Appeal ofStarwalkerPRLLC, rendered in conformancewith the Board's Charter. Dated:

3 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         975,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,296,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                   139,060
<INVENTORY>                                  1,612,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,072,249
<PP&E>                                       8,703,983
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,127,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,375,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,904,142
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,575
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,664,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,375,001
<SALES>                                     36,515,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,515,839
<CGS>                                       33,394,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,394,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,569,213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                80,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             110,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                361,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                   140,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            220,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   220,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
In The Matter Of: PHILIP PUTTER Respondent 

### SERVED: MAY 15, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC
) ) ) ) ) Docket No. FAA-2015-0210 Case No. 2013EA110075 

### ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING On May 14,2015,the FAA informally contacted the Office ofHearings ("OH") by telephone, and asked the OH attorney staffabout the status ofthis proceeding. The FAA advised the OH attorney staffthat the Respondent had filed a one-page Letter with the FAA's Hearing Docket, seeking to withdraw his March 5, 2015 Request for Hearing ("Request"). The OH attorney staffadvised the FAA that the Respondent had not filed any documents with the Court. The OH attorney staffthen conducted a web search on regulations.gov and found a one-page Letter, dated April 9, 2015, in which the Respondent stated that "[t]he matter has been settled between the parties." The Respondent asked to withdraw his Request for hearing. Although the Respondent sent his Letter to the FAA Hearing Docket and the FAA attorney, he did not file a copy ofthe letter with the Court. As a result, the OH attorney staff copied the Letter, and placed it in the Court's file. After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn his Request for Hearing, and this proceeding is dismissed withprejudice.

Attachment: Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY 

### Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWrightBuilding-Suite2W1000 1



### Ms. Judith L. 

### Vaughan 

### Complainant's Counsel Federal AviationAdministration Office ofRegional Counsel 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3255 FAX: 718-995-5699 Mr. Lawrence R. DiGiansante 

### Respondent Counsel ONE COPY



### Mr. Philip Putter 

### Respondent DocketNo. FAA-2015-0210 (Civil Penalty Action)

984 Morris ParkAvenue Bronx,NY 10462 TEL: 718-822-0707 7 5 Westlake Dr. Thornwood, NY 10594 TEL: 917-903-7575 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service inperson orbyexpedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Adam M. Moskowitz

Joseph M. Kaye

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

Service@moskowitz-law.com

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice Application Forthcoming)

Stephen Neal Zack

Hon. Ursula Ungaro (Ret.)

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800, Miami, FL 33131

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 11-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 11-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 2 of 2