alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WILLIAM G. ACKERMAN *v.*CHARLES E. GORTON.

*Will*— nested *remainder*— lien *of judgment on*— pow&r *of sale.*

A testator by his will devised his real estate to his wife, to be used and enjoyed by her during the term of her natural life, “ and from and immediately after her decease ” he devised the same to his children, naming them. By a codicil he authorized his wife to sell and dispose of the real estate, upon the condition that the sale should be subject to the approval of each and every of the heirs of his estate, surviving at the time of such sale. Subsequently, and after the recovery of a judgment against one of the children, the widow, with the consent and approval of all the heirs, sold the property. *Held,*that the children took vested estates in remainder in the real estate, immediately upon the decease of the testator; that the judgment subsequently recovered, became a lien upon the share of the judgment debtor, and that the same could not be cut off by the sale under the power.

*Livingston*v. *Greene*(52 N. Y., 118) followed.

Controversy submitted without action, under section 372 of the Code.

*Ralph E. Prime,*for plaintiff. *Matt. TI. Ellis,*for defendant.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.

Present— Barnard, P. J., Tappen and Talcott, JJ.

Judgment for defendant, upon submitted case, with costs.
§ 105-68.1010 Suspending official. ( a ) *Suspending official* means an agency official who is authorized to impose suspension. The suspending official is either: ( 1 ) The agency head; or
( 2 ) An official designated by the agency head.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and Industrial 
Innovation; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92--
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and 
Industrial Innovation--(1194).
    Date and Time: July 14, 2000, 8 a.m.-5:30 pm.
    Place: Room 330, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Kamalakar Rajurkar, Program Director, 
Manufacturing Machines, and Equipment, (703) 306-1330, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate XYZ-On-a-Chip proposals as part 
of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 522b(c), (4) and (6) of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: June 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15826 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5636 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5636

  To provide compensation for injury and property damages suffered by 
   persons as a result of the bombing attack by the United States on 
      August 20, 1998 in Khartoum, Sudan, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2000

 Mr. Rohrabacher introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide compensation for injury and property damages suffered by 
   persons as a result of the bombing attack by the United States on 
      August 20, 1998 in Khartoum, Sudan, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, from amounts in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sum as necessary up to a 
total amount of $50,000,000 in settlement of claims by persons 
suffering injury or property loss as a result of the missile attack in 
Khartoum, Sudan, on August 20, 1998, by the Armed Forces of the United 
States. Such payments shall be in full satisfaction of these claims.

SEC. 2.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall not pay any claim filed against 
the United States or any agency thereof later than 60 days after 
reference of this bill to the Court of Claims pursuant to section 1492 
of title 28, United States Code.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS' FEES.

    No part of the amounts appropriated under section 1 in excess of 10 
percent thereof shall be paid or delivered to or received by any agent 
or attorney on account of services rendered in connection with the 
claim referred to in section 1, and the same shall be unlawful, any 
contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Any person violating the 
provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon 
conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed $1,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 101-30.704 Agency responsibilities.
Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 20, 2000 / Notices 38251

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00–41]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104–

164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 00–41 with

attached transmittal and policy

justification.

Dated: June 13, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

38252 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 20, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 20, 2000 / Notices 38253

38254 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 20, 2000 / Notices

[FR Doc. 00–15437 Filed 6–19–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23117-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

EMILIO PINERO,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLAGLER 1164 LLC, and CHONG’S

CHINESE RESTAURANT, INC.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER APPROVING AND ENTERING CONSENT 

DECREE AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of and Entry 

of Consent Decree and to Dismiss Action with Prejudice. ECF No. [27]. The Court has reviewed 

the same, the record, and is otherwise fully advised. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND

ADJUDGED as follows.

1. The Joint Motion for Approval of and Entry of Consent Decree and to Dismiss 

Action with Prejudice, ECF No. [27], is APPROVED.

2. The Court approves and adopts the Consent Decree. The Consent Decree is 

hereby entered, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Consent Decree, 

ECF No. [27-1].

4. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs except as detailed in the 

Consent Decree and/or as agreed by the Parties. 

Case 1:22-cv-23117-BB Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-23117-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on March 14, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23117-BB Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2023 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 8, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Center for Waste Reduction Technologies (“CWRT”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) The identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are Center for Waste Reduction Technologies, New York, NY; America Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY; Arthur D. Little, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI; Eastman Chemical Co., Kingsport, TN; Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY; E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, DE; Merck & Company, Whitehouse Station, NJ; Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., St. Paul, MN; Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO; Owens Corning Co., Toledo, OH; Rohm & Haas Co., Philadelphia, PA; and SmithKline Beecham Corp., King of Prussia, PA. The nature and objectives of the venture are to develop a set of tangible metrics to assess the economic and environmental impact of business operations. The metrics are intended to allow the users to examine various options of chemistry, process, product and even product line to determine their relative contributions to sustainability. These metrics being developed by the project will cover mass and energy intensity, pollutants dispersion and the use of water, renewables and recyclables.                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-15601  Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 105-72.500 Purpose of procurement standards.

Sections 105-72.501 through 105-72.508 set forth standards for use by recipients in establishing procedures for the procurement of supplies and other expendable property, equipment, real property and other services with Federal funds. These standards are furnished to ensure that such materials and services are obtained in an effective manner and in compliance with the provisions of applicable Federal statutes and executive orders. No additional procurement standards or requirements shall be imposed by the Federal awarding agencies upon recipients, unless specifically required by Federal statute or executive order or approved by OMB.
§ 105-55.028 Termination of collection activity. ( a ) The General Services Administration (GSA) may terminate collection activity when— ( 1 ) The Agency is unable to collect any substantial amount through its own efforts or through the efforts of others;
( 2 ) The Agency is unable to locate the debtor;
( 3 ) Costs of collection are anticipated to exceed the amount recoverable;
( 4 ) The debt is legally without merit or enforcement of the debt is barred by any applicable statute of limitations;
( 5 ) The debt cannot be substantiated; or
( 6 ) The debt against the debtor has been discharged in bankruptcy.
( b ) Before terminating collection activity, GSA will pursue all appropriate means of collection and determine, based upon the results of the collection activity, that the debt is uncollectible. Termination of collection activity ceases active collection of the debt. The termination of collection activity does not preclude GSA from retaining a record of the account for purposes of— ( 1 ) Selling the debt, if the Secretary determines that such sale is in the best interests of the United States;
( 2 ) Pursuing collection at a subsequent date in the event there is a change in the debtor's status or a new collection tool becomes available;
( 3 ) Offsetting against future income or assets not available at the time of termination of collection activity; or
( 4 ) Screening future applicants of loans and loan guaranties, licenses, permits, or privileges for prior indebtedness.
( c ) Generally, GSA will terminate collection activity on a debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, regardless of the amount. GSA may continue collection activity, however, subject to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, for any payments provided under a plan of reorganization. Offset and recoupment rights may survive the discharge of the debtor in bankruptcy and, under some circumstances, claims also may survive the discharge. For example, the claims of GSA that it is a known creditor of a debtor may survive a discharge if the Agency did not receive formal notice of the proceedings.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in AML Communications, Inc.’s previously filed RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-82774 and 333-32488) and on Form S-8 (Nos.333-5126 and 333-68097) of our report, dated June 4, 2004, for the year endedMarch 31, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AMLCommunications, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2005.

SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP

Los Angeles, California**June 29, 2005

----
Case 2:22-cr-14059-AMC Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:22-cr-14059-AMC Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 2 of 4
22-CR-14059-CANNON/MAYNARD

Case 2:22-cr-14059-AMC Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:22-cr-14059-AMC Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 4 of 4
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida

NELSON FERNANDEZ, 

LITE USA HOLDINGS, INC. 

d/b/a LITE STORE USA, 

a Florida for-profit corporation, 

LITE USA HOLDINGS, INC. 

d/b/a LITE STORE USA, 

a Florida for-profit corporation, 

c/o Registered Agent:Cynthia J.Jackson 

4400 PGA Blvd Ste 603 

Palm Beach Gardens, Fl 33410

The Law Office of Pelayo Duran, PA 

4640 NW 7th St. 

Miami, FL 33126

9:22-cv-81512-AMC

Sep 30, 2022 s/ R. Bissainthe

Case 9:22-cv-81512-AMC Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2022 Page 1 of 1
250 E Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000 | 800-942-2677 | TTY 800-833-3722

To: Deborah Jeffrey

Inspector General 

From: Jill Graham /s/

Acting Chief Risk Officer 

Subject: High-Dollar Overpayments for the quarter ending December 31, 2019

Date: February 3, 2020

The purpose of this document is to comply with the High-Dollar overpayments reporting 

requirements in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123, Appendix C. 

Appendix C requires agency heads to submit reports quarterly on High-Dollar 

overpayments to the Office of Inspector General.

The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) identifies high-dollar 

overpayments through improper payments testing, which is currently completed on a 

rolling basis. CNCS has identified the AmeriCorps, RSVP, FGP, and SCP grant programs as 

susceptible to significant improper payments. The high-dollar overpayment threshold is 

based upon aggregate payments to an individual or entity during a quarter. For the 

reporting period covering 10/01/2019 through 12/31/2019, CNCS did not identify any 

high-dollar overpayments.

This report upholds the agency’s commitment to carrying out the Executive Order goal of 

eliminating payment errors. Reducing improper payments is a key priority for CNCS. We 

continue to monitor programs in order to reduce the amount of overpayments.
##### 



Exhibit 15 The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Allied Capital Corporation: Re: Registration Statement
Nos. 333-45525, 333-13584, 333-88681, 333-101849, 333-115979,
333-115980 and 333-115981. Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated
August 5, 2005 related to our review of
interim financial information. Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant,
or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act. /s/ KPMG LLP Washington, D.C.
August 5, 2005
##### 



Exhibit 15 The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Allied Capital Corporation: Re: Registration Statement
Nos. 333-45525, 333-13584, 333-88681, 333-101849, 333-115979,
333-115980, 333-115981, 333-130793 and 333-130792. Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated August 9, 2006 related to our review of
interim financial information. Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant,
or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act. /s/ KPMG LLP Washington, D.C.
August 9, 2006
#### § 102-73.105 What policies must Federal agencies follow to implement the requirements of NEPA when acquiring real property by lease?

Federal agencies must follow the NEPA policies identified in §§ 102-76.40 and 102-76.45 of this chapter.
#### Ellen Mildred Migneault *vs.*Alfred O. Migneault.

OCTOBER 19, 1962.

Present: Condon, C. J., Paolino, Powers and Frost, JJ.

Condon, C. J.

This is a wife’s petition for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The case is here on her bill of exceptions to the trial justice’s decision on the merits and to two rulings on the admission of evidence. However, since the latter exceptions were not briefed and argued they must be deemed to be waived. *Hakonson*v. *Hakonson,*64 R. I. 276.

The exception to the trial justice’s decision raises only the narrow question whether it was clearly wrong. In his decision, after reviewing the evidence and commenting favorably thereon for respondent, he expressly found that petitioner had failed to sustain the burden of proof and therefore denied her petition.

*126
      *Keefer and Kirby, Scott K. Keefer,*for petitioner.

*Irving I. Zimmerman,*for respondent.

It appears from the transcript that the evidence was conflicting on whether respondent had treated petitioner with extreme cruelty. There also appeared to be some question as to the credibility of petitioner. In the resolution of such questions the trial justice because of his opportunity to observe the witnesses as they testify is in a superior position ordinarily to weigh the evidence and pass upon its credibility. For this reason it is our firmly-established practice not to disturb his decision unless it is clearly wrong. *Harwood*v. *Harwood,*94 R. I. 165, 179 A.2d 317; *Comery*v. *Comery,*76 R. I. 191.

After a careful perusal of the transcript and the exhibits we cannot say that the trial justice was clearly wrong. In our opinion no useful purpose would be served by a discussion of the evidence and therefore we have refrained from such discussion. However unlikely it may appear to be now, a reconciliation of the parties may well be possible in the future. If so, our refusal to rehearse the details of their marital difficulties here may contribute to the accomplishment of that desirable result.

All of the petitioner’s exceptions are overruled, and the cause is remanded to the family court for further proceedings.
Case 1:22-cv-23912-PCH Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2023 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 1 OF FORM 10-Q DATED MARCH 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                             114
<SECURITIES>                                        83
<RECEIVABLES>                                      109
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         38
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   367
<PP&E>                                             367
<DEPRECIATION>                                      86
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               65
<BONDS>                                            368
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                             21
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    88
<CGS>                                               16
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       47
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     33
<INCOME-TAX>                                        13
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 20
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        20
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>