alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UROGEN CORP. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         314,983
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  348,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               683,874
<PP&E>                                         410,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,097,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,958,218
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         58
<COMMON>                                         9,379
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,943,165)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,097,752
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,858,554
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (300)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             296,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,962,388)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,962,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,962,388)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.00)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



TRI-ISTHMUS GROUP, INC.
    
    2007 FORM 10-KT
 Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Transition Report on Form 10-K of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Dennis M. SmithDennis M. SmithChief Financial Officer
#### § 102-85.170 Can flexitime and other alternative work schedules cost the customer agency more?

Yes, GSA customers who extend their regular work schedule by a system of flexible hours shall reimburse GSA for its approximate cost of the additional services required.
#### § 102-73.15 What real estate acquisition and related services may Federal agencies provide?

Federal agencies, upon approval from GSA, may provide real estate acquisition and related services, including leasing (with or without purchase options), building and/or site purchase, condemnation, and relocation assistance. For information on the design and construction of Federal facilities, see part 102-76 of this chapter.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wei Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s)1350, as adopted
pursuant to (s)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Wei Li             
|Wei Li                 
|Chief Financial Officer
|April 30, 2010
#### § 101-30.504 Cataloging data from Defense Logistics Services Center (DLSC).

Upon receipt of cataloging data from civil agencies, DLSC will process the data and provide for their inclusion in the Federal Catalog System. Notification to the submitting and originating agencies of the action taken by DLSC will be as required in the Federal Catalog System Policy Manual (DOD 4130.2-M) and will be accomplished by means of electric accounting machine cards, magnetic tape, or wire transmission, according to the capabilities of those agencies. DLSC will send this information to the agencies that are designated by GSA as direct data receivers. Otherwise, DLSC will transmit the information to the submitting agency to be forwarded to the originating agency, when required.

[42 FR 36256, July 14, 1977]
#### § 102-78.5 What is the scope of this part?

The real property policies contained in this part apply to Federal agencies, including GSA's Public Buildings Service (PBS), operating under, or subject to, the authorities of the Administrator of General Services. The policies in this part are in furtherance of GSA's preservation program under section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470) and apply to properties under the jurisdiction or control of the Administrator and to any Federal agencies operating, maintaining or protecting such properties under a delegation of authority from the Administrator.
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Greg Orth) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Greg Orth.

Dated this 20th day of March 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 106 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/20/2023 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: May 10, 2004                                                                                                                     |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Geoffery E. Merszei

                              Executive Vice President and 

Chief                              Financial Officer |
#### Lucien Thibideau vs. William Mullins.

OCTOBER 23, 1962.

Present: Condon, C. J., Roberts, Paolino and Frost, JJ.

Condon, C. J.

This action of trover and conversion was tried before a justice of the superior court without a jury. The case is here on the defendant’s exception to the trial justice’s decision in favor of the plaintiff.

On the evidence before him the trial justice found that defendant had wrongfully taken plaintiff’s car from a private parking lot and had refused to surrender it upon proper demand therefor by plaintiff’s attorney. Consequently *133lie decided that defendant had no valid defense. The defendant contends that he erred in failing to draw reasonable inferences from the evidence which showed that the car was lawfully taken and that no proper demand had been made for its return.

The evidence is undisputed. It appears therefrom that defendant had towed the car away from the parking lot and stored it in his garage at the request of the police department of the city of Providence. It further appears that plaintiff had been arrested while sitting in his car on the parking lot of St. Michael’s Church in Providence and thereafter had been taken to the police station. He never saw his car again.

Upon what authority the police acted does not appear. Nor does it appear that plaintiff’s car was connected in any way directly or indirectly with the cause of his arrest. The defendant presented no evidence in his own behalf to justify his compliance with the request of the police, but he argues that the reasonable inference from plaintiff’s evidence is that such action on his part was lawful. And he further argues that being lawful he could not be held guilty of conversion until a proper demand was made upon him for the surrender of the car, which he claims the evidence fails to show.

On our view of the evidence we do not reach his second contention. We cannot say from our reading of the transcript that the trial justice was clearly wrong in weighing the evidence as he did and in concluding that the defendant had no authority for taking the plaintiff’s car. Nor do we agree that he erred in not drawing the inference that the police requested the defendant to tow it away for safekeeping or because it was necessary to prevent the plaintiff from using it to escape at the time of his arrest. In our opinion there is not a scintilla of evidence that would justify such inferences. Therefore the law as stated in *1344 Am. Jur., Arrest, §§68 and 69, p. 47, which the defendant cites in support of his contention that the trial justice erred in applying the law to the facts, is not in point.

*Pontarelli & Berberian, Aram K. Berberian,*for plaintiff.

*Anthony Grilli, Anthony E. Grilli,*for defendant.

The defendant’s exception is overruled, and the case is remitted to the superior court for entry of judgment on the decision.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Online Gaming Systems, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard Dunning, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                     |     |                                                                                       
|-------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: July 31, 2007 | By: | /s/ Richard Dunning                                                                   
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer
Online Gaming Systems, Ltd.
#### § 102-75.795 What happens after the disposal agency receives the assignment request by DOJ or FEMA?

If, after considering other uses for the property, the disposal agency approves the assignment request by DOJ or FEMA, the disposal agency must convey the property to the appropriate grantee. The disposal agency must proceed with other disposal action if it does not approve the assignment request, if DOJ or FEMA does not submit an assignment request, or if the disposal agency does not receive the determination within the 30 calendar days specified in § 102-75.780. The disposal agency must notify OJP or FEMA 15 days prior to any announcement of a determination to either approve or disapprove an application for correctional, law enforcement, or emergency management response purposes and must furnish to OJP or FEMA a copy of the conveyance documents.
#### § 102-75.145 Is GSA required to review each report of excess?

Yes, GSA must review each report of excess to ascertain whether the report was prepared according to the provisions of this part. GSA must notify the landholding agency, in writing, whether the report is acceptable or other information is needed within 15 calendar days after receipt of the report.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 571 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 571

     To prohibit Federal payments to any business, institution, or 
organization that engages in human cloning or human cloning techniques.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit Federal payments to any business, institution, or 
organization that engages in human cloning or human cloning techniques.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Human Cloning Prevention Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

    (a) General Rule.--Except as provided in subsection (b), no Federal 
agency shall--
            (1) make any grant, contract, or other payment; or
            (2) enter into any obligation for making any such payment,
to any business, institution, or organization that, within the past one 
year, has engaged in human cloning, or to any business, institution, or 
organization that controls, is controlled by, or is under common 
control with any business, institution, or organization that, within 
the past one year, has engaged in human cloning.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to any payment a 
Federal agency is obligated to make.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``human cloning'' means making 
an identical, or substantially identical, copy of the genetic material 
of an individual human being, living or deceased, so as to cultivate 
one or more new human cells which could, if not otherwise engineered, 
develop into a new individual human being.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with the Annual Report of Patapsco  Bancorp,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  the undersigned certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   Section   1350,  as  added  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects,  the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
              Report.


                              By: /s/ Joseph J. Bouffard
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Name:   Joseph J. Bouffard
                                  Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer



                              By: /s/ Michael J. Dee
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Name:   Michael J. Dee
                                  Title:  Senior-Vice President
                                          Chief Financial Officer


Date: December 22, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darren Peterson, Appellant.

[627 NYS2d 365]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered August 11, 1993, convicting defendant, after a non-jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of l1/2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, 757, *cert denied*469 US 932), the evidence was legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree where testimony at trial showed that he attempted to make purchases at a department store with a stolen credit card (Penal Law § 165.45 [2]). It is immaterial whether the credit card either had expired or been cancelled or revoked when the defendant attempted to use it *(People v Winfield,*145 AD2d 449, 450, *lv denied*73 NY2d 1024). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Natoma

Manors

Bay

Heights

Golden Pines

North

Grove

Shorecrest

Bay Point

Miami International Airport

Morningside

Grapeland Heights

Little Havana Dodge Island

Shenandoah

Virginia Key

Auburndale

Liberty City

Silver Bluff

Wynwood

Little River

Downtown

The Roads

Allapattah

Little Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

C

O

C

O

N

U

T

G

R

O

V

E

pU

ep Er sa St edi

r et a wegdE

D

1

Alt. M

a

p

Ve

rsio

n

1

4

Districts

12345

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 173-17 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

This is a Court-Authorized Reminder Notice and is not a solicitation from a lawyer. 

The Court has made no finding about the merits of the case at this time.

IF YOU ARE OR IF YOU WERE WORKING AS A CAPTAIN, SERVER, AND/OR 

BUSSER AT KIKI ON THE RIVER FROM SEPTEMBER 23, 2019 TO THE PRESENT, 

AND RECEIVED SOME BUT NOT ALL THE TIPS YOU EARNED, THEN A 

COLLECTIVE ACTION LAWSUIT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS.

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, sued Defendants, 450 North River Drive, LLC d/b/a Kiki on the River, 

RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones, in federal court in Miami, Florida, alleging that he and the other 

captains, servers, and bussers were not paid all the tips they earned in violation of the Fair Labor 

Standards Act. The case is Octavio Collado vs. 450 North River Drive, LLC, RJ River, LLC, and 

Roman Jones. The Case Number is 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES.

The Court allowed Plaintiff to send notice to all similarly situated current and former van drivers 

(including operations support and warehouse workers) of 450 North River Drive, LLC d/b/a Kiki 

on the River, RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones, who worked in South Florida so they can “optin” or join this lawsuit to assert similar legal rights.

The Court has not yet decided whether the Defendants did anything wrong. There is no money 

available now and no guarantees that there will be any money. However, you have a choice to 

assert your legal rights in this case. If there is no recovery or judgment in Plaintiff’s favor, you 

will not be responsible for any attorneys’ fees.

This notice is a reminder that to opt-in and join this lawsuit, you must complete the “Notice 

of Consent to Opt-In Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 219” form and mail, fax, or email to it to the 

Representative Plaintiff’s counsel on or before ______________ ____, 2023. 

If you did not receive the Notice of Consent to Opt-In Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 219, then please 

contact the Representative Plaintiff’s Counsel:

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33156

Tel: (305) 230-4884

Text: (786) 386-0885

Fax: (305) 230-4844

brian@fairlawattorney.com

www.fairlawattorney.com

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 65-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2023 Page 1 of 2
135	San	Lorenzo	Avenue,	Suite	770,	Coral	Gables,	Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884			FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

EXHIBIT

“G”

EXHIBIT “G”

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 65-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2023 Page 2 of 2