alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1507 Appointing a representative. We will recognize a person as your representative if: ( a ) You and your representative complete and sign our prescribed appointment form; and
( b ) You or your representative file our prescribed appointment form in the manner we designate.
[89 FR 67555, Aug. 21, 2024]
EXHIBIT A 

Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 1 of 3
Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 2 of 3
Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 3 of 3
§ 102-37.320 Under what conditions may a SASP abandon or destroy undistributed surplus property? ( a ) You may abandon or destroy undistributed surplus property when you have made a written finding that the property has no commercial value or the estimated cost of its continued care and handling would exceed the estimated proceeds from its sale. The abandonment or destruction finding must be sent to the appropriate GSA regional office for approval. You must include in the finding: ( 1 ) The basis for the abandonment or destruction;
( 2 ) A detailed description of the property, its condition, and total acquisition cost;
( 3 ) The proposed method of destruction (burning, burying, etc.) or the abandonment location;
( 4 ) A statement confirming that the proposed abandonment or destruction will not be detrimental or dangerous to public health or safety and will not infringe on the rights of other persons; and
( 5 ) The signature of the SASP director requesting approval for the abandonment or destruction.
( b ) GSA will notify you within 30 calendar days whether you may abandon or destroy the property. GSA will provide alternate disposition instructions if it disapproves your request for abandonment or destruction. If GSA doesn't reply to you within 30 calendar days of notification, the property may be abandoned or destroyed.
§ 109-27.5104-6 Control by using organization. ( a ) After receipt, the using organization shall provide necessary controls for precious metals. Materials shall be stored in a non-combustible, combination locked repository at all times except for quantities at the actual point of use.
( b ) Each using organization shall maintain a log showing the individual user, type and form of metal, and the time, place, and purpose of each use. The log shall be kept in a locked repository when not in use.
( c ) The logs and secured locked storage facilities are subject to review by the Precious Metals Control Officer and other audit or review staffs as required.
( d ) Cognizant Departmental managers are responsible for assuring that minimum quantities of precious metals are withdrawn consistent with work requirements and that quantities excess to requirements are promptly returned to the stockroom.
#### § 102-81.30 Are there any special considerations for existing Federal facilities and Federal grounds under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of GSA?

No, the RMP Standard applies to existing nonmilitary Federal facilities as part of the periodic risk assessment process. The security organization responsible for the Federal facility or Federal grounds will conduct a periodic risk assessment and recommend countermeasures and design features to be implemented at the Federal facility or on the Federal grounds. The FSC will determine whether the recommended countermeasures will be implemented or if risk will be accepted. The design and implementation of approved countermeasures at existing facilities must comply with applicable laws, regulations, and Executive orders. For approved countermeasures that cannot be implemented immediately, a plan to phase in countermeasures and achieve compliance must be instituted and documented in accordance with the RMP Standard. In some cases, the implementation of countermeasures must be delayed until renovations or modernization programs occur.
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 21, 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with PACCAR FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on March 4, 2011 b etween PACCAR and EPA . The attendees included: PACCAR: Dan Kieffer , Ryan Reed, Peter Klinkline EPA: By ron Bunker , Cle Jackson, Prashanth Gururaja, Julian Davis , Arvon Mitcham, and Angela Cullen The discussion focused on coastdown testing of PACCAR tractors and enhanced coastdown test procedures, including the following:  Grade  Coastdown tracks  Coastdown data anal ys s  Trailer height  Speed range  Tires  Anemometer
#### § 102-72.80 What are Executive agencies' responsibilities under a disposal of real property delegation of authority from GSA?

With this delegation, Executive agencies have the authority to utilize and dispose of excess or surplus real and related personal property and to grant approvals and make determinations, subject to the conditions in the delegation document.
#### § 102-79.95 Who is responsible for the costs associated with providing access to antenna sites?

The telecommunications service provider is responsible for any reasonable costs to Federal agencies associated with providing access to antenna sites, including obtaining appropriate clearance of provider personnel for access to buildings or land deemed to be security sensitive as is done with service contractor personnel. OMB Circular A-25, entitled “User Charges,” revised July 8, 1993, provides guidelines that agencies should use to assess fees for Government services and for the sale or use of Government property or resources. For antenna sites on non-GSA property, see also the Department of Commerce Report on “Improving Rights-of-Way Management Across Federal Lands: A Roadmap for Greater Broadband Deployment” (April 2004) beginning at page 26. Under 40 U.S.C. 1314, GSA is covered in granting easements and permits to support the installation of antennas and cabling across raw land in support of constructing new and improving existing telecommunication infrastructures provided that such installation does not negatively impact on the Government.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23944-KMW

 Plaintiff,

vs.

COLE HAAN COMPANY STORE, LLC.

a Foreign limited liability company,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

 Plaintiff, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, through undersigned attorney Diego G. Mendez, 

pursuant to the Federal Rules Civil Procedure files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with

Prejudice against COLE HAAN COMPANY STORE, LLC.

Submitted by:

Mendez Law Offices, PLLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

P.O. BOX 228630 

Miami, Florida 33172 

Telephone: 305.264.9090 

Facsimile: 305.809.8474

Email:info@mendezlawoffices.com 

By: /s/

DIEGO GERMAN MENDEZ, ESQ. 

FL BAR NO.: 52748

###

Case 1:22-cv-23944-KMW Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2023 Page 1 of 1
## Massachusett s SI P Revisio n

31 0 CM R 7.36 , Transi t Syste m Improvement s

Contents

1 . Final Amendment

s t o 31 0 CM R7.3 6 (Effectiv e 10/25/13 ) 2 . Final Amendments t

o 31 0 CM R7.3 6 i n red-line/strikeout (unofficia l version ) 3 . Summar

y o f Comment

s an d Respons

e to Comment

s o n th e Propose d Regulatio n an

d Propose d Amendments t o th

e Stat e Implementatio n Pla

n 4 . Copie s o f

Publi c Comment

s Received 5 . Publi c Proces s Certificatio n 6 . Notic e o f

Publi c Hearing 7 . Background Documen t an d Technica

l Suppor t fo r Publi c Hearing s
#### § 102-73.135 What scoring rules must Federal agencies follow when considering leases and leases with purchase options?

All Federal agencies must follow the budget scorekeeping rules for leases, capital leases, and lease-purchases identified in appendices A and B of OMB Circular A-11. (For availability, see 5 CFR 1310.3.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-Q of Alcan Aluminium Limited for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000


<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            440
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,032
<PP&E>                                         12,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                  6,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  9,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,538
<BONDS>                                         1,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                       160
<COMMON>                                        1,218
<OTHER-SE>                                      4,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    9,759
<SALES>                                         5,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5,560
<CGS>                                           4,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  351
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 60
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   450
<INCOME-TAX>                                      174
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               267
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      267
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.19



</TABLE>
#### § 101-5.4900 Scope of subpart.

This subpart contains forms, reports, and related instructions used in connection with the regulations on centralized services in Federal buildings prescribed in this part 101-5.

[30 FR 4359, Apr. 3, 1965]
#### § 102-75.45 What does the term “Not utilized” mean?

Not utilized means an entire property or portion thereof, with or without improvements, not occupied for current program purposes of the accountable Executive agency, or occupied in caretaker status only.
#### § 101-30.101-16 Data transmission.

*Data transmission* means the operation of telecommunication equipment for the receipt and transmission of item identification and management data.

[41 FR 11308, Mar. 18, 1976]
Exhibit 4.2



SHARE   CERTIFICATE YX ASSET RECOVERY LIMITED THIS SHARE CERTIFICATE CERTIFIES THAT   as of November 2019, [Shareholder’s Name] of [Shareholder’s Address] is the   registered holder of [Number of Shares] fully paid Class A Ordinary Shares of   US$0.001 par value per share in the above named Company which are held   subject to, and transferable in accordance with, the Memorandum and Articles   of Association of the Company (as Revised). In Witness Whereof the Company   has authorised this certificate to be issued on of November 2019. By Director   8821031_1 Shares Number
#### § 102-73.40 What happens if the dollar value of the project exceeds the prospectus threshold?

Projects require approval by the Senate and the House of Representatives if the dollar value of a project exceeds the prospectus threshold. To obtain this approval, the Administrator of General Services will transmit the proposed prospectuses to Congress for consideration by the Senate and the House of Representatives. Furthermore, as indicated in § 102-72.30(b), the general purpose lease delegation authority is restricted to below the prospectus threshold, and therefore, GSA must conduct all lease acquisitions over the threshold.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,600,249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,408,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                   120,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,287,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,882,045
<PP&E>                                       3,348,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                 460,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,801,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,543,687
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,992
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,366,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,801,858
<SALES>                                     12,322,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,322,291
<CGS>                                        6,612,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,499,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             166,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,343,695)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   457,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (886,695)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 959.18 Subpoenas.

The Postal Service is not authorized by law to issue subpoenas requiring the attendance or testimony of witnesses or the production of documents. This does not affect the authority of the Chief Postal Inspector to issue subpoenas for the production of documents or information pursuant to § 233.1(c) of this chapter.

[39 FR 33213, Sept. 16, 1974, as amended at 56 FR 55825, Oct. 30, 1991]
§ 3040.132 Supporting justification. Supporting justification shall be in the form of a statement from one or more knowledgeable Postal Service official(s) who sponsors the request and attests to the accuracy of the information contained within the statement. The justification shall: ( a ) Explain the reason for initiating the docket and explain why the change is not inconsistent with the applicable requirements of this part and any applicable Commission directives and orders;
( b ) Explain why, as to market dominant products, the change is not inconsistent with the policies and the applicable criteria of chapter 36 of title 39 of the United States Code;
( c ) Explain why, as to competitive products, the addition, deletion, or transfer will not result in the violation of any of the standards of 39 U.S.C. 3633;
( d ) Verify that the change does not classify as competitive a product over which the Postal Service exercises sufficient market power that it can, without risk of losing a significant level of business to other firms offering similar products: ( 1 ) Set the price of such product substantially above costs;
( 2 ) Raise prices significantly;
( 3 ) Decrease quality; or
( 4 ) Decrease output.
( e ) Explain whether or not each product that is the subject of the request is covered by the postal monopoly as reserved to the Postal Service under 18 U.S.C. 1696 subject to the exceptions set forth in 39 U.S.C. 601;
( f ) Provide a description of the availability and nature of enterprises in the private sector engaged in the delivery of the product;
( g ) Provide any information available on the views of those who use the product on the appropriateness of the proposed modification;
( h ) Provide a description of the likely impact of the proposed modification on small business concerns; and
( i ) Include such information and data, and such statements of reasons and bases, as are necessary and appropriate to fully inform the Commission of the nature, scope, significance, and impact of the proposed modification.
[72 FR 63698, Nov. 9, 2007. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 81138, Dec. 15, 2020]
#### § 102-40.50 What must we do when we no longer need personal property with special handling requirements?

Except for the items listed in § 102-40.55, you must report excess personal property with special handling requirements that you no longer need to GSA for Federal and donation screening (see § 102-36.215 of this subchapter for how to report excess personal property to GSA). The report to GSA must clearly identify property requiring special handling, and all related hazards, precautions, and handling requirements related to this property. You must dispose of property not required to be reported to GSA in accordance with applicable Federal, state, and local laws and regulations, and your agency procedures. See § 102-40.125 for policy regarding disposal of property requiring special handling by abandonment or destruction. Disposal must be accomplished so as to preserve as much as possible, any civilian utility or commercial value of the property.
1

Ryan M. Aboud, P.A.

980 N. Federal Hwy., Suite 110, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Tel. (561) 208-8205

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO: 0:22-cv-61826-AHS

HOWARD MICHAEL CAPLAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

ENTERPRISE AUTO SERVICE, INC., a

Florida Profit Corporation and LAUDERDALE

LAKES INDUSTRIAL PARK II, LTD., a

Florida Limited Partnership,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM, MAILING ADDRESS AND EMAIL ADDRESS

Counsel for Defendant, LAUDERDALE LAKES INDUSTRIAL PARK II, LTD., Ryan 

M. Aboud, Esq., hereby states that his contact information has changed and designates the 

following as his current Firm, mailing address and email address:

Ryan M. Aboud, Esq.

Ryan M. Aboud, P.A.

980 N. Federal Hwy., Suite 110

Boca Raton, FL 33432

Tel. (561) 208-8205

Email: Ryan@RMALaw.net

Dated: October 27, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 

Ryan M. Aboud, P.A.

Attorney for Defendant, LAUDERDALE LAKES 

INDUSTRIAL PARK II, LTD.

980 N. Federal Hwy., Suite 110

Boca Raton, FL 33432

Telephone: (561) 208-8205

Telephone (954) 552-7739

Ryan@RMALaw.net

By: /s/ Ryan M. Aboud, Esq.

Ryan M. Aboud, Esq.

FBN: 27366

Case 0:22-cv-61826-AHS Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

Ryan M. Aboud, P.A.

980 N. Federal Hwy., Suite 110, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Tel. (561) 208-8205

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on October 27, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being 

served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in 

the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF 

or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive 

electronically Notice of Electronic Filing.

By: /s/ Ryan M. Aboud, Esq.

Ryan M. Aboud, Esq.

FBN: 27366

SERVICE LIST

Ronald E. Stern, Esq.

The Advocacy Law Firm, P.A.

1250 East Hallandale Beach Blvd., Suite 503

Hallandale Beach, FL 33009

ronsternlaw@gmail.com

Case 0:22-cv-61826-AHS Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2022 Page 2 of 2
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

EXHIBIT

“B”

EXHIBIT “B”

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 86-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/27/2023 Page 1 of 2
From: Velazquez, Reynaldo (Miami) Rey.Velazquez@jacksonlewis.com

Subject: Re: Kiki

Date: December 27, 2022 at 8:10 PM

To: Brian Pollock brian@fairlawattorney.com

Cc: Billingsby, Rebecca J. (Miami) Rebecca.Billingsby@jacksonlewis.com, Melody Blanco melody@fairlawattorney.com,

Bridget Obando bridget@fairlawattorney.com, Sarangoulis, Roman (Miami) Roman.Sarangoulis@jacksonlewis.com

Thank you for the courtesy Brian. I hope you and your family enjoy the rest of the week and have a happy and safe new year.

Rey

Reynaldo Velazquez

Attorney at Law

Jackson Lewis P.C.

One Biscayne Tower Two South Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 3500

Miami, FL 33131

Direct: (305) 577-7621 | Main: (305) 577-7600

Rey.Velazquez@jacksonlewis.com | www.jacksonlewis.com

From: Brian Pollock <brian@fairlawattorney.com>

Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2022 7:54:42 PM

To: Velazquez, Reynaldo (Miami) <Rey.Velazquez@jacksonlewis.com>

Cc: Billingsby, Rebecca J. (Miami) <Rebecca.Billingsby@jacksonlewis.com>; Melody Blanco <melody@fairlawattorney.com>; Bridget Obando <bridget@fairlawattorney.com>

Subject: Re: Kiki

[EXTERNAL SENDER]

Hi Rey,

I hope that you’re enjoying the holidays with your family. No objection on the extensions, and I appreciate the tolling of the SOL for the 14 days to alleviate any problems.

All the best,

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

FairLaw Firm

Ofc: 305.230.4884

Dir: 305.230.4822

Fax: 305.230.4844

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

brian@fairlawattorney.com

www.fairlawattorney.com

On Dec 27, 2022, at 4:19 PM, Velazquez, Reynaldo (Miami) <Rey.Velazquez@jacksonlewis.com> wrote:

Hi Brian. I hope you and your family are enjoying the holiday season. Roman and I are swamped and the holidays are not helping. We need one more week on the

response to the amended complaint, from December 30 to January 6, and 14 days on the response to the motion for conditional certification, from January 3 to January

17. We will agree to toll the SOL for the 14 days requested on the response to the motion for conditional certification. Can we represent to the court that both requests are

unopposed?

Thank you,

Rey 

Reynaldo Velazquez

Attorney at Law

Jackson Lewis P.C.

One Biscayne Tower Two South Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 3500

Miami, FL 33131

Direct: (305) 577-7621 | Main: (305) 577-7600

Rey.Velazquez@jacksonlewis.com | www.jacksonlewis.com

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 86-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/27/2023 Page 2 of 2
250 E Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000 | 800-942-2677 | TTY 800-833-3722

To: Deborah Jeffrey

Inspector General 

From: Lori Giblin /s/

Chief Risk Officer 

Subject: High-Dollar Overpayments for the quarter ending March 31, 2019

Date: April 15, 2019

The purpose of this document is to comply with the High-Dollar overpayments reporting 

requirements in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123, Appendix C. 

Appendix C requires agency heads to submit reports quarterly on High-Dollar 

overpayments to the Office of Inspector General.

The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) identifies high-dollar 

overpayments through improper payments testing, which is currently completed on a 

rolling basis. CNCS has identified the AmeriCorps, RSVP, FGP, and SCP grant programs as 

susceptible to significant improper payments. The high-dollar overpayment threshold is 

based upon aggregate payments to an individual or entity during a quarter. For the 

reporting period covering 01/01/2019 through 03/31/2019, CNCS did not identify any 

high-dollar overpayments.

This report upholds the agency’s commitment to carrying out the Executive Order goal of 

eliminating payment errors. Reducing improper payments is a key priority for CNCS. We 

continue to monitor programs in order to reduce the amount of overpayments.