alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                       NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                               EXHIBIT 11
                                    
                         THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED      TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
                       December 2, November 26,  December 2,   November 26,
                       ----------------------------------------------------       
                              1995         1994         1995           1994
                       ====================================================
<S>                       <C>          <C>          <C>            <C>
Net income for                                                             
computing earnings        $ 25,511     $ 39,019     $ 68,553       $ 96,932
per common share          ========     ========     ========       ========
                                                                           
Weighted average                                                           
number of common                                                           
shares outstanding        $927,330     $940,415     $927,263       $939,413
during each period        ========     ========     ========       ========
                                                                           
Net income per common     $  0.028     $  0.041     $  0.074       $  0.103
share                     ========     ========     ========       ========

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 686 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 686

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate a United States courthouse in Brownsville, Texas, as the 
                ``Garza-Vela United States Courthouse''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 686

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate a United States courthouse in Brownsville, Texas, as the 
                ``Garza-Vela United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at the corner of Seventh 
Street and East Jackson Street in Brownsville, Texas, shall be 
designated and known as the ``Garza-Vela United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Garza-Vela 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### Summary of the U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of Land Management national coal-hydrology program, 1974-84

Edited by: L. J. BrittonC. L. AndersonD. A. GoolsbyB. P. VanHaveren

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1464

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

During the decade 1974-84, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management cooperated on investigations to collect information and to study hydrologic processes related to development and mining of federally owned coal. In addition, the U.S. Geological Survey conducted similar investigations related to nonfederally owned coal. As a result of these nationwide investigations, a large quantity of hydrologic information and data has been collected and compiled in more than 500 reports. This report summarizes the major findings and accomplishments that have resulted from data-collection activities, hydrologic studies, and research concerned with the effects of coal mining on water resources.

This summary report includes: (1) A description of the Nation's coal and water-resource issues related to coal development, including history, objectives, and design of the coal-hydrology program; (2) a summary of the hydrologic information collected in the major coal provinces and published in more than 500 reports and journal articles; and (3) a summary and application of results obtained from topical studies undertaken throughout the program, including discussions on watershed modeling, salinity modeling, ground-water flow systems, geochemistry of mine spoils, mine drainage, sedimentation, and aquatic biology. A detailed coal-hydrology reference list concludes the report.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 102-75.885 What are the disposal agency's responsibilities concerning negotiated sales? The disposal agency must— ( a ) Obtain such competition as is feasible in all negotiations of disposals and contracts for disposal of surplus property; and
( b ) Prepare and transmit an explanatory statement if the fair market value of the property exceeds $100,000, identifying the circumstances of each disposal by negotiation for any real property specified in 40 U.S.C. 545(e), to the appropriate committees of the Congress in advance of such disposal.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5412

To amend the Social Security Act to eliminate the five-month waiting period

in the disability insurance program, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 2000

Mr. DEAL of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Social Security Act to eliminate the fivemonth waiting period in the disability insurance program,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Act

5 Improvements for the Terminally Ill Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF TITLE II WAITING PERIOD FOR

7 TERMINALLY ILL INDIVIDUALS.

8 Section 223(a) of the Social Security Act is

9 amended—
2

•HR 5412 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘he meets

2 the requirements of paragraph (3), or’’ after ‘‘but

3 only if’’; and

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new

5 paragraph:

6 ‘‘(3)(A) For purposes of paragraph (1), an individual

7 meets the requirements of this paragraph if—

8 ‘‘(i) the impairment underlying a finding that

9 the individual is under a disability results in his

10 death prior to the end of the applicable period de11 scribed in subparagraph (B), or

12 ‘‘(ii)(I) in the case where such finding is made

13 before the end of the applicable period, the Commis14 sioner determines that, at the time such finding is

15 made, such impairment is expected to result in the

16 individual’s death prior to the end of such period, or

17 ‘‘(II) in the case where such finding is made

18 after the end of the applicable period, the Commis19 sioner determines that, at any time during such pe20 riod, such impairment was expected to result in the

21 individual’s death prior to the end of such period.

22 ‘‘(B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A), the ‘ap23 plicable period’ is the period of the first six consecutive

24 calendar months throughout which such individual is

25 under a disability by reason of such impairment which be-
3

•HR 5412 IH

1 gins not earlier than the first day of the period described

2 in subsection (c)(2)(B).’’.

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect

5 with respect to applications filed after September 30,

6 2001.

Æ
#### § 102-76.50 What is sustainable development?

Sustainable development means integrating the decision-making process across the organization, so that every decision is made to promote the greatest long-term benefits. It means eliminating the concept of waste and building on natural processes and energy flows and cycles; and recognizing the interrelationship of our actions with the natural world.
Argued and submitted January 25,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration September 13,

petitioner’s motion for reconsideration filed September 20 allowed by opinion February 14, 1996

See 139 Or App 154, 911 P2d 362 (1996)

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Therese L. Petkovich, Claimant. Therese L. PETKOVICH, Petitioner, *v.*SAFEWAY STORES, INC., *Respondent.*

(93-07299; CA A84646)

902 P2d 137

Linda C. Love argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Craine & Love and Edward J. Harri.

Kenneth L. Kleinsmith argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Meyers, Radler, Replogle & Bohy and David J. Lefkowitz.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*613PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reduced her award of unscheduled permanent partial disability. The statutes pertinent to that review have been amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332 (SB 369). The changes to the Workers’ Compensation Law made by SB 369 generally apply to cases pending before this court on the effective date of the act, which was June 7, 1995. *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995). Because ORS 656.726(3)(f)(D) may affect the outcome of this case, we remand for reconsideration in the light of the new law.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
§ 102-75.550 What does “self-help housing or housing assistance” mean? Property for self-help housing or housing assistance (which is separate from the program under Title V of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act covered in subpart H of this part) is property for low-income housing opportunities through the construction, rehabilitation, or refurbishment of housing, under terms that require that— ( a ) Any individual or family receiving housing or housing assistance must contribute a significant amount of labor toward the construction, rehabilitation, or refurbishment; and
( b ) Dwellings constructed, rehabilitated, or refurbished must be quality dwellings that comply with local building and safety codes and standards and must be available at prices below prevailing market prices.
#### State of Iowa, appellee, v. Robert Dean Aldrich, appellant.

No. 49171.

(Reported in 83 N.W.2d 408)

June 4, 1957.

Hobar E. Newton, of Stuart, for appellant.

Norman A. Erbe, Attorney General, Freeman H. Forrest, Assistant Attorney General, and Ned Willis, County Attorney, for appellee.

Per Curiam

By an indictment.returned by the grand jury on June 6, 1956, the defendant was charged with the murder on or about May 2, 1956, of Lester Henry Mohr. On September 10, *9701956, the ease was called for trial to a jury, but being unable to agree, after being out about twenty-three hours, the jury was discharged by Judge S. E. Prall, and defendant held for trial at the next term of court.

The trial was resumed on November 13, 1956, with Judge George H. Sackett presiding, with defendant withdrawing his plea of not guilty, and entering a plea of former acquittal, which the court overruled and directed the county attorney to read the indictment for murder to the jury at the proper time, but to advise the jury that the only crime being submitted for their consideration was manslaughter, and any intended offenses which the trial court might under the record feel were proper to be submitted as included offenses.

On November 16, 1956, the jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty of the crime of assault with intent to inflict great bodily injury. After defendant’s motions in arrest of judgment and for new trial were overruled, on December 15, 1956, the matter came on for sentencing and the court ordered and adjudged that the defendant be sentenced to a term not exceeding one year at hard labor in the Men’s Reformatory at Anamosa, Iowa, and judgment rendered against him for the costs of the action.

Defendant appealed. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is therefore affirmed. — -Affirmed.
Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 58-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2023   Page 1 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 58-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2023   Page 2 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 58-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2023   Page 3 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 58-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2023   Page 4 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 58-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2023   Page 5 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 58-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2023   Page 6 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 58-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2023   Page 7 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 58-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2023   Page 8 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 58-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2023   Page 9 of 10

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 58-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2023   Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF PAINCARE HOLDINGS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of PainCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Randy Lubinsky, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark Szporka, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Randy Lubinsky                     
|Randy Lubinsky, Chief Executive Officer



Date: March 19, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark Szporka                     
|Mark Szporka, Chief Financial Officer



Date: March 19, 2004
#### § 102-38.260 Who makes the administrative determinations regarding mistakes in bids?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67867, Aug. 22, 2024.

The administrative procedures for handling mistakes in bids are contained in FAR 14.407, Mistakes in Bids (48 CFR 14.407). Your agency head, or his/her designee, may delegate the authority to make administrative decisions regarding mistakes in bids to a central authority, or a limited number of authorities in your agency, who must not re-delegate this authority.
#### § 102-75.280 What information concerning a proposed disposal must a disposal agency provide to the Attorney General to determine the applicability of antitrust laws?

The disposal agency must promptly provide the Attorney General with notice of any such proposed disposal and the probable terms or conditions, as required by 40 U.S.C. 559. If notice is given by any disposal agency other than GSA, a copy of the notice must also be provided simultaneously to the GSA Regional Office in which the property is located. Upon request, a disposal agency must furnish information that the Attorney General believes to be necessary in determining whether the proposed disposition or any other disposition of surplus real property violates or would violate any of the antitrust laws.
**Exhibit 8**

 

SUBSIDIARIES

 

The following are the subsidiaries of TripleP N.V., each of which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company:

 
| **Name**                               |   | **Legal Seat**               |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
| *Active*                               |   |                         |   |
| Triple P  Management B.V.              |   | Vianen - The Netherlands     |   |
| Triple P  Nederland B.V.               |   | Vianen - The Netherlands     |   |
| Triple P  Healthcare B.V.              |   | Vianen - The Netherlands     |   |
| Triple P  eActivity B.V.               |   | Zeist - The Netherlands      |   |
| Mediasystemen  B.V.                    |   | Haarlem - The Netherlands    |   |
|                                   |   |                         |   |
| *Inactive*                             |   |                         |   |
| Triple P  Services / B-Catel B.V.      |   | Driebergen - The Netherlands |   |
| Telesystems  Europe B.V.               |   | Zeist - The Netherlands      |   |
| Triple P  Intellectual Properties B.V. |   | Vianen - The Netherlands     |   |
| Triple P Lab  Info Systems B.V.        |   | Eindhoven - The Netherlands  |   |
| F.W. Salomons  Holding B.V.            |   | Driebergen - The Netherlands |   |
| Omega N.V./S.A.                        |   | Mechelen – Belgium      |   |
| Triple P USA Inc.                      |   | Fairfax-USA                  |   |

 

----
#### § 102-36.5 What is the governing authority for this part?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67866, Aug. 22, 2024.

Section 121(c) of title 40, United States Code, authorizes the Administrator of General Services to prescribe regulations as he deems necessary to carry out his functions under subtitle I of title 40. Section 521 of title 40 authorizes the General Services Administration (GSA) to prescribe policies to promote the maximum use of excess Government personal property by executive agencies.

[71 FR 53571, Sept. 12, 2006]
§ 102-73.175 What types of special purpose space may the Department of Commerce lease? The Department of Commerce is delegated authority to lease the following types of special purpose space: ( a ) Space required by the Census Bureau in connection with conducting the decennial census (lease terms, including all options, limited to 5 years).
( b ) Laboratories for testing materials, classified or ordnance devices, calibration of instruments, and atmospheric and oceanic research (lease terms, including all options, limited to 5 years).
( c ) Maritime training stations.
( d ) Radio stations.
( e ) Land (if unimproved, may be leased only on a fiscal year basis).
( f ) National Weather Service meteorological facilities.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5665

To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of

1974 to adjust the monthly multiemployer plan benefit guaranteed thereunder.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 14, 2000

Mr. QUINN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to adjust the monthly multiemployer

plan benefit guaranteed thereunder.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MULTIEMPLOYER PLAN BENEFITS GUARAN4 TEED.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4022A(c) of the Employee

6 Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C.

7 1322a(c)) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘$5’’ each place it appears in

9 paragraph (1) and inserting ‘‘$11’’;
2

•HR 5665 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘$15’’ in paragraph (1)(A)(i)

2 and inserting ‘‘$33’’; and

3 (3) by striking paragraphs (2), (5), and (6) and

4 by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as para5 graphs (2) and (3), respectively.

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

7 this section shall apply to any multiemployer plan that has

8 not received financial assistance (within the meaning of

9 section 4261 of the Employee Retirement Income Security

10 Act of 1974) within the 1-year period ending on the date

11 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 102-36.65 Why must we use excess personal property instead of buying new property?

Using excess personal property to the maximum extent practicable maximizes the return on government dollars spent and minimizes expenditures for new procurement. Before purchasing new property, check with the appropriate regional GSA Personal Property Management office or access GSAXcess ® for any available excess personal property that may be suitable for your needs. You must use excess personal property unless it would cause serious hardship, be impractical, or impair your operations.

[65 FR 31218, May 16, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 53572, Sept. 12, 2006]
#### § 102-75.985 Is the landholding agency required to assist the disposal agency in the disposition process?

Yes, the landholding agency must cooperate with the disposal agency in showing the property to prospective transferees or purchasers. Unless extraordinary expenses are incurred in showing the property, the landholding agency must absorb the entire cost of such actions.
Editorial Note on Part 101-8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-8.716 Complaints. ( a ) Any person, individually or as a member of a class (defined at § 101-8.703(e)) or on behalf of others, may file a complaint with GSA alleging discrimination prohibited by the Act or this regulation based on an action occurring after July 1, 1979. A complainant must file a complaint within 80 days from the date the complainant first has knowledge of the alleged act of discrimination. However, for good cause shown, GSA may extend this time limit.
( b ) GSA considers the date a complaint is filed to be the date upon which the complaint is sufficient to be processed.
( c ) GSA attempts to facilitate the filing of complaints if possible, including taking the following measures: ( 1 ) Accepting as a sufficient complaint, any written statement that identifies the parties involved and the date the complainant first had knowledge of the alleged violation, describes the action or practice complained of, and is signed by the complainant;
( 2 ) Freely permitting a complainant to add information to the complaint to meet the requirements of a sufficient complaint;
( 3 ) Notifying the complainant and the recipient (or their representative) of their right to contact GSA for information and assistance regarding the complaint resolution process.
( d ) GSA returns to the complainant any complaint outside the jurisdiction of this regulation, and states the reason(s) why it is outside the jurisdiction of the regulation.