alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 27, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39721-39722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 215

[DFARS Case 2000-D013]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Uncompensated 
Overtime Source Selection Factor

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Director of Defense Procurement has issued a final rule 
amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 
to remove text pertaining to the evaluation of uncompensated overtime 
hours in proposals for service contracts. The DFARS text duplicates 
text found in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 27, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kathleen Fenk, Defense Acquisition 
Regulations Council, OUSD (AT&L)DP(DAR), IMD 3D139, 3062 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone (703) 602-0296; telefax 
(703) 602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2000-D013.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    This final rule removes the text at DFARS 215.305(a)(1) pertaining 
to the evaluation of uncompensated overtime hours in proposals for 
service contracts. The DFARS text duplicates the text found at FAR 
37.115-2(c).
    This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review 
under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This final rule does not constitute a significant revision within 
the meaning of FAR 1.501 and Public Law 98-577 and publication for 
public comment is not required. However, DoD will consider comments 
from small entities concerning the affected DFARS subpart in accordance 
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments should cite DFARS Case 2000-D013.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does 
not impose any information collection requirements that require the 
approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, 
et seq.

[[Page 39722]]

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 215

    Government procurement.

Michele P. Peterson,
Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.

    Therefore, 48 CFR Part 215 is amended as follows:
    1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 215 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.

PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION


215.305  [Amended]

    2. Section 215.305 is amended by removing paragraph (a)(1).

[FR Doc. 00-15816 Filed 6-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5378 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5378

  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify the special 
   rule relating to continuous residence or physical presence under 
                      section 240A(d) of that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2000

Mr. Smith of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify the special 
   rule relating to continuous residence or physical presence under 
                      section 240A(d) of that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF CONTINUOUS PRESENCE FOR PURPOSES OF 
              CANCELLATION OF REMOVAL UPON COMMISSION OF OFFENSE 
              RENDERING ALIEN INADMISSIBLE OR DEPORTABLE.

    (a) In General.--Section 240A(d)(1) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1229b(d)(1)) is amended by striking 
``referred to in section 212(a)(2)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to aliens who are in proceedings under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act on or after the date of the enactment of this Act if 
those proceedings have not resulted in a final administrative order 
before such date.
                                 <all>
```
§ 102-2.135 How do agencies obtain forms prescribed by the FMR? For copies of the forms prescribed by in the FMR, do any of the following: ( a ) Write to us at: General Services Administration, National Forms and Publications Center (7CPN), Warehouse 4, Dock No. 1, 501 West Felix Street, Fort Worth, TX 76115.
( b ) Send e-mail messages to: *NFPC@gsa-7FDepot.*
( c ) Visit our web site at: *www.gsa.gov/forms/forms.htm .*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al. on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants. 

__________________________________/

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR A BRIEF STATUS 

CONFERENCE

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Request for a Brief Status 

Conference (ECF No. __). The Court has considered the motion and the pertinent portions of the 

record.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. A status conference is scheduled in this matter for [DATE] at [TIME].

2. The Court will circulate Zoom instructions by separate Order in advance of the 

conference 

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this __ day of March, 2023.

___________________________________

K. MICHAEL MOORE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23983-KMM Document 16-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 105-56.032 Fees.

GSA, while performing centralized salary offset computer matching services, may charge a fee sufficient to cover the full cost for such services. In addition, FMS, or GSA acting as the paying agency on behalf of FMS, may charge a fee sufficient to cover the full cost of implementing the administrative offset program. FMS may deduct the fees from amounts collected by offset or may bill the creditor agency. Fees charged for offset will be based on actual administrative offsets completed.
#### § 105-8.148 Consultation with the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

GSA shall consult with the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (ATBCB) in carrying out its responsibilities under this part concerning architectural barriers in facilities that are subject to GSA control. GSA shall also consult with the ATBCB in providing technical assistance to other Federal agencies with respect to overcoming architectural barriers in facilities. The agency's Public Buildings Service shall implement this section.
#### § 105-64.106 What is GSA's policy on information accuracy in a system of records?

System managers will ensure that all Privacy Act records are accurate, relevant, necessary, timely, and complete. All GSA systems are reviewed annually. Those systems that contain Personally Identifiable Information (PII) are reviewed to ensure they are relevant, necessary, accurate, up-to-date, and covered by the appropriate legal or regulatory authority. A listing of GSA Privacy Act Systems can be found at the following link (*http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentType=GSA_BASIC&contentId = 21567*).
§ 101-29.403-1 Authorization of exceptions. When the exceptions listed in § 101-29.402 do not apply and an applicable indexed product description is desired for use in procurement but does not meet an agency's essential needs, exceptions to the product description to effect procurement may be authorized as follows: ( a ) All exceptions to Federal telecommunications standards require prior approval by the Assistant Administrator for Information Resources Management, General Services Administration, Washington, DC 20405.
( b ) Preparing activities may designate specific product descriptions that require approval of exceptions by the preparing activity before use.
( c ) Exceptions to Federal product descriptions that do not require prior approval under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section may be authorized by the acquiring agency if: ( 1 ) Justifications for exceptions are subject to review before authorization and that such justification can be fully substantiated if post audit is required;
( 2 ) Notification of exception or recommendation for change to the Federal product description is sent promptly to the preparing activity and the General Services Administration (FCO), Washington, DC 20406.
(A statement of the exception with a justification and, where applicable, recommendation for revision or amendment to the description)
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5525

To extend the temporary office of bankruptcy judge established for the district

of South Carolina.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 23, 2000

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To extend the temporary office of bankruptcy judge

established for the district of South Carolina.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

4 The temporary office of bankruptcy judge authorized

5 for the district of South Carolina under section 3(a)(8)

6 of the Bankruptcy Judgeship Act of 1992 (28 U.S.C. 152

7 note) is extended until the first vacancy occurring in such

8 office resulting from the death, retirement, resignation, or

9 removal of a bankruptcy judge and occurring 8 years or

10 more after June 27, 1994.
2

•HR 5525 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF OTHER PROVISIONS.

2 All other provisions of section 3 of the Bankruptcy

3 Judgeship Act of 1992 (28 U.S.C. 152 note) remain appli4 cable to the temporary office of bankruptcy judge referred

5 to in section 1.

Æ
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CRAIG MIMS p/k/a JUJU BEATZ, an 

individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JONATHAN LYNDALE KIRK p/k/a 

DABABY, an individual; RODRICK 

WAYNE MOORE, JR. p/k/a RODDY 

RICCH, an individual; ROSS JOSEPH 

PORTARO IV p/k/a 

SETHINTHEKITCHEN, an individual; 

CAROLINE DIAZ a/k/a BAROLINE DIAZ, 

an individual; PROJECT DREAMS 

ENTERTAINMENT, LLC d/b/a PROJECT 

DREAMS PUBLISHING; SOUTH COAST 

MUSIC GROUP LLC d/b/a SOUTH 

COAST MUSIC GROUP; UNIVERSAL 

MUSIC GROUP, INC.; WARNER 

CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.; and UMG 

RECORDINGS, INC.

Defendants. 

/

CASE NO. 2:22-cv-14410-AMC

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, Craig Mims p/k/a Juju Beatz, by and through his undersigned counsel, pursuant 

to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), dismisses all claims in this action against all 

Defendants, without prejudice. Dismissal without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is proper 

because Defendants have not yet served an answer or a motion for summary judgment in this 

action.

Date: May 12, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

s/William R. Trueba, Jr.

William R. Trueba, Jr., Esq.

Florida Bar No. 117544

Case 2:22-cv-14410-AMC Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

wtrueba@lex188.com

Darlene Barron, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 108873

dbarron@lex188.com

TRUEBA & SUAREZ, PLLC.

7480 Bird Road, Suite 601

Miami, FL 33155

Telephone: (305) 482-1001

Facsimile: (786) 516-2826

Bradley J. Eiseman

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

bradeisemanlaw@gmail.com

THE LAW OFFICE OF BRADLEY J. 

EISEMAN

115 Harbor Common Drive

Memphis, Tennessee 38103

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Craig Mims

Case 2:22-cv-14410-AMC Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2023 Page 2 of 2
No. 11-8374.

#### Judkins *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### § 102-117.325 May my agency appear on its own behalf before a transportation regulatory body proceeding?

Generally, no executive agency may appear on its own behalf in any proceeding before a transportation regulatory body, unless the Administrator of General Services delegates the authority to the agency. The statutory authority for the Administrator of General Services to participate in regulatory proceedings on behalf of all Federal agencies is in section 201(a)(4) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (40 U.S.C. 501(c)(1)(B)).

[65 FR 60061, Oct. 6, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32323, May 31, 2022]
§ 101-30.503 Maintenance actions required. After converting to the Federal Catalog System, the agency concerned shall promptly take maintenance actions affecting the items converted and new items to be added. These actions may include deletion or revision of item identification or management data, or any other change required to ensure that the recorded data are maintained on a current basis. Submission of data to DLSC shall be as follows: ( a ) As new items meeting criteria for national stock number (NSN) assignment are added to an agency's supply system, the agency shall submit data to GSA, the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), the Veterans Administration (VA), or DLSC when a direct submitter of catalog data is involved in accordance with § 101-30.303.
( b ) All civilian agencies not authorized to submit catalog data direct to DLSC shall prepare Standard Form 1303, Request for Federal Cataloging/Supply Support Action (illustrated at § 101-30.4901-1303), to request maintenance action. Maintenance requests shall be submitted to GSA for collaboration and submission to DLSC, except that civilian agencies receiving supply support on an item from a DLA center or the VA, as expressed by major organizational entity (MOE) rule, should submit these requests to the DLA center using DD Form 1685, Data Exchange and/or Proposed Revision of Catalog Data, or to the VA using Standard Form 1303, for collaboration and submission to DLSC. When GSA receives maintenance requests on these items, they will be forwarded to the appropriate DLA center or to the VA.
( c ) Agencies authorizd to submit catalog data direct to DLSC as provided in § 101-30.303(a) shall comply with item maintenance and data collaboration procedures as set forth in the Defense Integrated Data System (DIDS) Procedures Manual (DOD 4100.39M).
( d ) All civilain agencies not authorized to submit catalog data to DLSC shall use Standard Form 1303, Request for Federal Cataloging/Supply Support Action, to request maintenance action. Proposed maintenance requests shall be submitted to GSA for collaboration and submission to DLSC, except that civilian agencies receiving supply support from DLA supply centers, as expressed in the DLSC user record by major organizational entity (MOE) rule, should submit proposed maintenance requests to the appropriate DLA supply center for collaboration and submission to DLSC. When GSA receives maintenance requests for these items, they will be referred to the appropriate DLA supply center.
( e ) Any civilian agency participating in the Federal Catalog System (those agencies previously assigned a Cataloging Activity Code) may propose action for maintenance of the catalog system tools as outline in § 101-30.201(b).
[41 FR 11310, Mar. 18, 1976, as amended at 42 FR 36255, July 14, 1977; 43 FR 18673, May 2, 1978; 46 FR 35646, July 10, 1981]
#### § 102-75.800 What information must be included in the deed of conveyance?

The deed of conveyance of any surplus real property transferred under the provisions of 40 U.S.C. 553 must provide that all property be used and maintained for the purpose for which it was conveyed in perpetuity. If the property ceases to be used or maintained for that purpose, all or any portion of the property must, at the option of the United States, revert to the United States in its existing condition. The deed of conveyance may contain additional terms, reservations, restrictions, and conditions the Administrator of General Services determines to be necessary to safeguard the United States' interests.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended by this Form 10-Q/A, of Analogic Corporation (the
Company) for the quarter ended October 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael L. Levitz, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and
Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
February 7, 2014



/s/    Michael L.
LevitzMichael L. LevitzSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
November 7, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KENDRA CAIN, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00825-CV V.

ESTATE OF LYDIA TEBO NORMAN, AS ESTATE REPRESENTATIVE OF 

LYDIA TEBO NORMAN, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on August 26, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Kendra Cain.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Alexander M. Peraza, Esq. of the law firm Dimond Kaplan 

& Rothstein, P.A., hereby enters his appearance as counsel for Defendant William Trevor Lawrence

and requests that copies of all future pleadings, orders, and other papers filed or served in this matter 

be served on him via CM/ECF or at the address listed below, as appropriate.

Date: February 23, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

DIMOND KAPLAN & ROTHSTEIN, P.A.

Offices at Grand Bay Plaza

2665 South Bayshore Drive, PH-2B

Miami, Florida 33133

Telephone: (305) 374-1920

Facsimile: (305) 374-1961

By: /s Alexander M. Peraza

Alexander M. Peraza, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 107044

APeraza@dkrpa.com

Counsel for William Trevor Lawrence

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2023 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 63273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24810]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending October 5, 2013

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2013-0185.
    Date Filed: October 3, 2013.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: October 24, 2013.
    Description: Application of Ukraine International Airlines 
requesting a foreign air carrier permit to engage in scheduled air 
transportation of passengers, property and mail between any point or 
points in Ukraine, via intermediate points, and any point or points in 
the United States, and beyond; and on-demand charter air transportation 
of passengers, property and mail between any point or points in Ukraine 
and any point or points in the United States, as well as any point or 
points in the United States and any point or points in a third country 
or countries subject to pertinent national, bilateral and international 
rules and regulations.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register 
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2013-24810 Filed 10-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
#### § 102-75.260 When may the disposal agency dispose of surplus real property by exchange for privately owned property?

The disposal agency may dispose of surplus real property by exchange for privately owned property for property management considerations such as boundary realignment or for providing access. The disposal agency may also dispose of surplus real property by exchange for privately owned property where authorized by law, when the requesting Federal agency receives approval from the Office of Management and Budget and the appropriate oversight committees, and where the transaction offers substantial economic or unique program advantages not otherwise obtainable by any other acquisition method.
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION 

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Michael Andrew Orta and Virgil Sweet) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Michael Andrew Orta and Virgil Sweet.

Dated this 27th day of July 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 176 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 109-38.903-50 Reporting DOE motor vehicle data.

See 41 CFR 102-34 subpart J.