UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

Regulatory Docket No. _______________

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF: Christopher McCorkel FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)

& (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI INSPIRE 1 PROFESSIONAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95)

Submitted on June 1 5 , 2015 Christopher McCorkel 203 Treelodge Parkway Atlanta, GA 30350 Tel: 678

- 367

- 1622 Email: mccorkelc@hotmail.com2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................3

SUMMARY...................................................................................................................... .....4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER....................................................4

BACKGROUND................

..................................................................... ...............................5

BASIS FOR PETITION.........................................................................................................5

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETIT IONER.............................................................7

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH CHRISTOPHER MCCORKEL SEEKS EXEMPTION

.. ............................................................... ....... 8

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF CHRISTOPHER MCCORKEL SEEKS AND THE REASON CHRISTOPHER MCCORKEL SEEKS THE RELIEF

.. .........................11

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING CHRISTOPHER MCCORKEL ’S REQUEST WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ......

. ..................... ..............................14

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY...........................................................

. ...............1 7

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER..

. ....31
ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT CHRISTOPHER MCCORKEL’S REQUEST.........31
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................

. ......31

APPENDICES.................................................................................

. .......3 33 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level AOI Area of Interest ATC Air Traffic Control ATO Air Traffic Organization AV Aerial Vehicle CFR Code of Federal Regulations COA Certificate of Authorization
FAA Federal Aviation Administration FAR Federal Aviation Regulation GCS Ground Control Station GPS Global Positioning System LOL Loss of Link NAS National Airspace System NOTAM Notice to Airman PIC Pilot In Command Section 333 FAA Modernization and Ref orm Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333 SO Safety Observer SOP Standard Operating Procedures UA Unmanned Aircraft UAS Unmanned Aircraft System
VFR Visual Flight Rules VLOS Visual Line of Site VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions VTOL Ver tical Takeoff and Landing4 SUMMARY Christopher McCorkel seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircr aft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit Christopher

McCorkel to operate an Unmann ed Aircraft System (UAS) for commercial purpose s of conducting aerial video and photography of any business, construction sites, real estate, and landscape over certain areas of the United States.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER Christopher McCorkel has over 5 years of professional experience in Broadcast

Production. He is a Commercial Producer for a local television station and uses advanced technologies to provide editing, shooting, and graphics to his clients meeting their production

needs

. Additionally, Christopher McCorkel has 18 years experience in competitive motocross racing g iving him a strong background in practicing safety, quick judgment, and responsibility in a very fast paced environment of constant action. The objective of Christopher McCorkel ’s aerial video and photography operation s is to provide high quality imaging for a variety of

co mme rcial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting:

• Professional a erial cinematography and photography of any business

• Television / Web commercials

• Outdoor Event / Venue Coverage

• Real estate and private property aerial photography , Land surveying

• Increase public awareness and knowledge of UAS and promote safe UAS operations5 BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Inspire 1 UAS Christopher McCorkel seeks an exemption to operate DJI systems for compensation or

hire within the NAS. The DJI Inspire 1 is a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The DJI Inspire 1 has a maximum gross weight of approximately 6 pounds 7.5 ounces, while having a length of 17.3 inches , width of 17.7 inches, height of 11. 8 inches, and a

m aximum speed of approximately 42 knots. The DJI Inspire 1 is equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors.

The DJI Inspire 1 UAS that will be operated by Christopher McCorkel will be registered
in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft , as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration , and marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identifica tion and Registration Marking

. BASIS FOR PETITION
Petitioner, Christopher McCorkel , pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA),
Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems , hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Christopher McCorkel ’s operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS6 meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Accordingly, Christopher McCorkel requests relief from Sections 91.40 5(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. Christopher McCorkel submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will be ensured. Christopher McCorkel will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the oper ating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log , and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Christopher McCorkel will document and

maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Inspire 1 UAS

. Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) an d (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command , is requested by Christopher McCorkel to the extent necessary to allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as

well as an airman medical cer tificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Christopher McCorkel seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft

air worthiness , because the DJI Inspire 1 UAS do es not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, Christopher McCorkel submits that he

will ensure that the DJI Inspire 1 UAS is in an airworthy condition, prio r to every flig ht, by determining that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly7 Maintenance Log, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft is in a condition for safe flight. Christopher McCorkel also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121,

entitled Altimeter Settings , as the DJI Inspire 1 UA S will not have a typical barometric altimeter
onboard. However, altitude information of the DJI Inspire 1 UA will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude
information, combined with Christopher M cCorkel ’s operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 5 00 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section

91.121. Additionally, Christopher McCorkel seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b ), entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions

. Christopher

McCorkel submits that safety will not be affected by operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UA during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of approximately 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes.
In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Christopher McCorkel provides the following information in support of its petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner. The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is: Christopher McCorkel 203 Treelodge Parkway Atlanta, GA 30350 Tel: 678

- 367

- 1622 Email: mccorkelc@hotmail.com8 B. The Spec ific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which Christopher McCorkel Seeks Exemption.

1. Christopher McCorkel Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b).
Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command , subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part: (a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of an aircraft that is carrying passenge rs or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft. (b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if

— (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. Christopher McCorkel Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a).
Section 91.7, entitl ed Civil aircraft airworthiness , subsection (a), states the following: (a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

3. Christopher McCorkel Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121. Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings , subsection (a), states the following, in part: (a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating

-- (1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to

-- (i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical miles of the aircraft; (ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; or9 (iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.

4. Christopher McCorkel Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions , subsection (b), states the following: (b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

5. Christopher McCorkel Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a).
Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required , subsection (a), states the following: Each owner or operator of an aircraft

— (a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this secti on, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]

6. Christopher McCorkel Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1)
Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration , subsection (a)(1), states the following: (a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless

-- (1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter[.]

7. Christopher McCorkel Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 91.409(a)(2).
Section 91.409, entitled Inspections , subsection (a), states the following:10 (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had

-- (1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or (2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this chapter.

8. Christopher McCorkel Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) And 91.417(b).
Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records , subsections (a) and (b), state the following: (a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section: (1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and records of the 100

- hour, annual, progressive, and other required or a pproved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include

-- (i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the wor k performed; and (ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and (iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft for return to service. (2) Records containing the following information: (i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor. (ii) The current status of life

- limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance. (iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis.11 (iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained. (v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required. (vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances. (b) The owner or o perator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: (1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed. (2) T he records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. (3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this chapter shall be retaine d until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to service.

C. The Extent Of Relief Christopher McCorkel Seeks And The Reason Christopher McCorkel Seeks The Relief.

1. Extent Of Relief Christopher McCorkel Seeks And The Reason Christopher McCorkel Seeks Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b). Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations:

Pilot in command , is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or hig her level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flight

- hour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire. This relief is requested since the lim itations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any12 business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. As set forth more fully below, Christopher McCorkel submits that an equivalent level of safety will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has met certain flight

- hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the

PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with the operations specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive an d emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.
Further, Christopher McCorkel submits that all flights of t he DJI Inspire 1 UAS , conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to Christopher

McCorkel ’s business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. Extent Of Relief Christopher McCorkel Seeks And The Reason Christopher McCorkel Seeks Relief From Section 91.7(a). Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , is requested to the extent required to allow Christopher McCorkel to determine that the DJI Inspire 1 UAS is in airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in comp liance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). Christopher McCorkel seeks the requested relief because the DJI Inspire 1 UAS do es not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C. F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, Christopher McCorkel will ensure that the DJI Inspire 1 UAS is in airworthy condition based upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e ., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft is in condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and limitations below.

3. Extent Of Relief Christopher McCorkel Seeks And The Reason Christopher McCorkel Seek s Relief From Section 91.121.13 Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings , may be required to allow flight operations of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS , which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio communications telemetry da ta link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), C hristopher McCorkel seeks the requested relief because the DJI Inspire 1 UA altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight. Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety wi ll be maintained since the

DJI Inspire 1 UA is equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and provides the PIC with altitude infor mation of the UA on the heads

- up display of the GCS.

4. Extent Of Relief Christopher McCorkel Seeks And The Reason Christopher McCorkel Seeks Relief From Section 91.151(b). Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR condi tions , is requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Inspire 1 UA during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. Christopher McCorkel seeks the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered DJI Insp ire 1 UA will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial14 video or still photo flight operations that Christopher McCorkel proposes to conduct pursuant to

this Petition. Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Insp ire 1 UAS , the DJI Inspire 1 operating documents, and Christopher McCorkel’s proposed operating
limitations, ensure that Christopher McCorkel will safely operate the battery powered DJI Inspire

1 UA during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly afte r that for at least 4.5 minutes.

5. Extent Of Relief Christopher McCorkel Seeks And The Reason Christopher McCorkel Seeks Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b). Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91 .409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, Christopher McCorkel requests relief from

these Sections because the DJI Inspire 1 UAS do es not require an airworthiness certificate. As set forth more fully below, the DJI Inspire 1 UAS meet s the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, Christopher McCorkel will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Man ual ). Furthermore, Christopher

McCorkel will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Inspire 1 UAS

. D. The Reasons Why Granting Christopher McCorkel ’s Request Would Be In The Public Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole. Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Christopher

McCorkel to safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of
businesses, construction sites, real estate, and landscape over certain areas of the United States.15 Additionally, use of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of Christopher

McCorkel ’s proposed operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS will be realized without implicating any privacy issues.
1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Inspire 1 UA is battery powered and serve s as a safe, efficient, and economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use

of a DJI Inspire 1 UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground. Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestio n around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Inspire 1 UA do es not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewe r aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations.
2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Inspire 1 UAS

. Conducting aerial acquisit ions with the DJI Inspire 1 UAS , instead of manned aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery

p ower and electric motors, the DJI Inspire 1 UAS produce s no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial video and ph otography, while burning16 approximately 20

- 30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Inspire 1 UA , while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAs are propelled by battery powered electric m otors, rather than an internal combustion engine. By using the DJI Inspire 1 UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Inspire 1 UA (weighing approximately 6 pounds 7.5 ounces, at its maximum gross weight with a length of 17.3 inches,

widths of 17.7 inches, and with no fuel on board), has less physical pote ntial for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations (weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, an d a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).
3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Inspire 1 UA S Will Benefit The Economy. In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Inspire 1 UAS is also an economical alternative to using manne d aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of

the DJI Inspire 1 UAS will allow United States based companies, like Christopher McCorkel ’s , to remain competitive and contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companie s must adopt new and alternative technology in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Inspire

1 UAS is one such technology that not only allows companies greater operational flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operational cost of a

traditional manned aircraft.17 By operating the DJI Inspire 1 UAS , companies such as Christopher McCorkel ’s , can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. companies, through commercial use of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS , provides a stable workforce that increases consumer spending; improves loca l, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United States and abroad.
4. There Are No Privacy Issues. Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, Christopher McCorkel ’s proposed operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS will not implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Inspire 1 UAS will be operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual ),

which requires property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, and in

accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements
of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.
E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The Rule From Which Christopher McCorkel Seeks Exemption. 1. Reasons Why The DJI Inspire 1 UA Meet s The Conditions Of The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333. In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Christopher McCorkel ’s operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS

meet s the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.18 Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part: (a) In General.

-- Notwithstanding any other requirement of thi s subtitle, and not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the plan and rulem aking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act. (b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

-- In making the determination under subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum

-- (1) which types o f unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or t he public or pose a threat to national security; and (2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1). (c) Requirements for Safe Operation.

-- If the Secretary determines under this section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish require ments for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system. In seeking this exemption, Christopher McCorkel submits that the DJI Inspire 1 UAS can operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the

characteristics of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS ; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.
a. The Specifications Of The DJI Inspire 1 UAS Demonstrate Its Safe Characteristics.19 The DJI Inspire 1 UAS do es not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability.
i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Inspire 1 UAS. The technical specifications o f the DJI Inspire 1 UAS is set forth by the DJI Inspire 1 Specifications and Data Sheet, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

ii. The DJI Inspire 1 UAS Autonomous Flight And Navigation Modes Enable The UASs To Remain Within A Defined Operational Area.
The DJI Inspire 1 UAS may be operated in both manual and fully autonomous flight modes. A complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS is provided at pages 12

- 16 and 45

- 50 of the DJI Inspire 1 User Manual , attached hereto as Exhibit

B

. iii. The DJI Inspire 1 UAS is Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation. When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Inspire 1 UA will remain stationary, in fl ight, for 3
seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Inspire 1 UA do es not reacquire control link data
from the GCS, the UA will assume that the Control Link is lost and the UA will return to the home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will d escend to the takeoff position and

shutdown. A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS are set forth at pages 13 through 15 of the DJI Inspire 1 User Manual , attached hereto as Exhibit B

. iv. The DJI Inspire 1 GCS And Its Operation. A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Inspire 1 GCS and flight control software is provided at pages 40 through 47 of the DJI Inspire 1 User Manual. DJI Inspire 1 User Manual is att ached hereto as Exhibit B

.20 b. Flight Operations Of DJI Inspire 1 UAS is Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A Certificated Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer. Christopher McCorkel will only utilize certificated pilots who possess a current and valid airman medical certificate to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS

. Additionally, a safety observer will assist all pilots during flight time.
c. Flights Of DJI Ins pire 1 UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating Limitations. In seeking this exemption, Christopher McCorkel proposes to commercially operate DJI Inspire 1 UAS for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of United States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations: 1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UASs weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Inspire 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant.
2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the purpose of aerial video and photography. 3. The UAs may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots. 4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 5 00 feet above ground level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL.
5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate. 6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not permitted. 7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO and PIC must be able to communicat e verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating documents.21 8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not permitted to operate the camera or other instruments. 9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petit ions for extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents. 10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe flight. If the inspect ion reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be i ncluded in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records. 11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records. 12. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the operating documents. 13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements

. 14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraf t records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS to service.
15. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety Bulletins.22 16. Th e authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections. 17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third

class medical c ertificate. 18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of tra ining the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for fl ight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not
au thorized. 20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as denoted on a current FAA

- published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon request.
21. The UA may not be operated less than 5 00 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a pre

determined location within the planned oper ating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating documents. 23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in accordance with the operating documents. 24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining. 25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organizat ion (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of23 exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less tha n 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential transponder requirements. 26. All aircraft operated in accordanc e with the exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N

Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.
27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements. 28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.
29. The UA must rema in clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation operations and activities at all times. 30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonpartic ipating persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless: a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediatel y and/or; b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determi ned that it does not present an undue hazard, and; c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a). 32. All operations shall be conducted over private or contro lled

- access property with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.24 33. Any incident, accident, or flight o peration that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

. 2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety. Christopher McCorkel submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Inspire 1

UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency

r equirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Considering Christopher McCorkel ’s proposed area of operations, and the operating

limitations set forth

- above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of commercial pilot requirements ( See Exemption No. 11062); and the

airman ship skills necessary to safely operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS, Christopher McCorkel submits that the additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for Christopher McCorke l ’s specific proposed flight operations. The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos.
11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 1 1066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). Christopher McCorkel will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour requirem ents or the DJI Inspire 125 UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those hours as a UAS pilot o perating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 111 38, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during Christopher McCorkel ’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flig ht experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as follows: In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi

- rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and m odel of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 hours of multi

- rotor time and t he 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight

- ho ur requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in complia nce with applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and experience

- b uilding flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119.26 Exemption No. 11138 at page 15. Accordingly, Christopher McCorkel will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.
3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety. The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) wi ll be maintained because prior to every flight, Christopher McCorkel will ensure that the DJI Inspire 1 UAS is in an airworthy condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as

stated in the conditions and limitations herein.

A dditionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption
Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112 , 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).
4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not Adversely Affect Safety. The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintain ed because

the altitude information of the DJI Inspire 1 UA will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This alt itude information, combined with Christopher McCorkel’s operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UA within vis ual line of sight, at or below

5 00 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude27 information will be generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by the UAS at ground level. The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specif ic to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos.
11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety. A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS ; (2) the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight operations. Accordingly, Christopher McCorkel will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered DJI Inspire 1 UA during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. Here, as in Exemption No. 11109 , the technical specifications of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS ; the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b).
Furthermore, safe ty will be ensured as the DJI Inspire 1 UAS provide audible and visual warnings to the PIC at the GCS when the UA experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10%

rema ining battery power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI Inspire 1 UAS will descend and land automatically.28 Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that safety is not adversely affected when the t echnical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and
10650. Moreover, the FAA h as previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos.
8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110,

1 1136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).
6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety. In seeking this exemption, Christopher McCorkel submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) wi ll be met because Christopher McCorkel will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or

pr eventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual).
Furthermore, Christopher McCorkel will document and maintain all maintenance records for the

DJI Inspire 1 UAS

. Since the DJI Inspire 1 UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, Christopher McC orkel will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI Inspire 1 User Manual is attached

hereto as Exhibit B ; a copy of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS Maintenance Log is attached here to as

Exhibit C

.29 Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because Christopher

McCorkel will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practice s prescribed by the operating documents. Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS will be performed by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the monthly maintenance log. Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered.

In consideration of Christopher McCorkel ’s proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and the technical aspects of the D JI Inspire 1 UAS , Christopher McCorkel submits that safety will not be adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080,
11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

7. The F AA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions , Christopher McCorkel requests that the FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS , which30 contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.40 9(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special conditions will permit safe operation of the UA for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets f orth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness

certification in accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation

of the UAS in the NAS. Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS , since the airworthi ness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions , states the following:

If the FAA finds that the airwort hiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special c onditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations.
See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16. Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe special conditions for Christopher McCorkel ’s intended operation of the DJI In spire 1

UAS , which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R31 Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405 (a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

F. A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: The Rules From Which Christopher McCorkel Seeks Exemption: Christopher McCorkel seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).
A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption Christopher McCorkel Seeks:

T

his exemption will permit Christopher McCorkel to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States.

G. Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments A vailable To Support Christopher McCorkel ' s Request. This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may operate safely in the NAS. As such, Christopher McCorkel ’s request for exemption may be granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the pub lic, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without an airworthiness certification.
As discussed in detail above, Christopher McCorkel will operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS safely in the N AS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security.

CONCLUSION
As set forth herein, Christopher McCorkel seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §

11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernizati on and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will32 permit safe operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAS commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. By g ranting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by allowing Christopher McCorkel to safely, efficiently,

and econom ically operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS commercially within the NAS.

WHEREFORE , in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Christopher McCorkel respectfully requests that the Administrat or grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Christopher McCorkel to operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over

certain areas of the United States.

Date d: June 1 5 , 2015

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________ Christopher McCorkel 203 Treelodge Parkway Atlanta, GA 30350 Tel: 678

- 367

- 1622 Email: mccorkelc@hotmail.com33 Appendic es :

A

– DJI Inspire 1 Specifications Data Sheet B

– DJI Inspire 1 Manufacturer’s User Manual C

– Monthly Maintenance Log

APPENDIX

– A

DJI INSPIRE 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Christopher McCorkel only utilizes safe and reliable UASs. DJI is an industry leader in small UAS production. DJI UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to set parameters which will not allow flight into controlled airspace. Parameters can also be set to limit flight to no higher than a predetermined and set altitude as well as limit f l ight to a predetermined and set distance. In addition, DJI software provides real

- time altitude and location information t o the PIC via the linked monitor (smart phone/tablet devices)

. 1.1 DJI Inspire 1

1.1.1 Aircraft 1.1.1.1 Model

– T600 1.1. 1.2 Weight (Battery Included)

– 6lbs 7.5291oz (2935 g) 1.1.1.3 Hover Accuracy ( GPS Mode)

– Vertical: 0.5 m; Horizontal: 2.5m 1.1.1.4 Max Angular Velocity

– Pitch: 3 00 0 /s ; Yaw: 150 0 /s 1.1.1.5 Max Tilt Angle

- 35 0 1.1.1.6 Max Ascent Speed

– 5 m/s 1.1.1.7 Max Descent Speed

– 4 m/s 1.1.1.8 Max Flight Speed

– 22 m/s ( ATTI mode, no wind ) 1.1.1.9 Max Flight Altitude

– 4500m 1.1.1.10 Max Wind Resi stance

– 10m/s 1.1.1.11 Max Flight Time

– Approximately 18 minutes 1.1.1.12 Motor Model

– DJI 3510 1.1.1.13 Propeller Model

– DJI 1345 1.1.1.14 Operating Temperature Range

- 14 0 F to 104 0 F (

- 10 0 C to 40 0 C) 1.1.1.15 Dimensions

- 17 1⁄4” x 17 3⁄4” x 12”

1.1.2 Gimbal 1.1.2.1 Model

– Zenmuse X3 1.1.2.2 Output Power (with camera)

– Static: 9W; In Motion: 11W 1.1.2.3 Operating Current

– Static: 750mA; In Motion: 900mA 1.1.2.4 Angular Vibration Range



## - ±0.030 1.1 .2.5 Mounting

– Detachable34 1.1 .2.6 Controllable Range

– Pitch:

- 900 to +300; Pan: ±3200 1.1 .2.7 Mechanical Range

– Pitch:

- 1250 to 450; Pan: ±3300 1.1 .2.8 Max Controllable Speed

– Pitch: 1200/s; Pan: 1800/s

1.1.3 Camera 1

. 1 .3.1 Name

– X3 1.1 .3.2 Model

– FC350 1.1 .3.3 Total Pixe ls

– 12.76M 1.1 .3.4 Effective Pixels

– 12.4M 1.1 .3.5 Image Max Size

– 4000x3000 1.1 .3.6 ISO Range

– 100

- 3200 1.1 .3.7 Field of View

- 940 1.1 .3.8 CMOS

– Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” 1.1 .3.9 HD Video Recording

– UHD(4K): 4096x2160p24/25, 3840x2160p24/25/30; FHD: 1920x1080p24/25/30/48/50/60; HD: 1280x720p24/25/30/48/50/60 1.1 .3.10 Operating Temperature Range

- 32 0 F

- 104 0 F (0 0 C

- 40 0 C)

1.1.4 Remote Controller 1

. 1 .4.1 Name

– C1 1.1 .4.2 Operating Frequency

– 5.728

- 5.850GHz; 2.400

- 2.483GHz 1

. 1 .4.3 Communicating Distance (unobstructed)

– 2000m 1.1 .4.4 Output Power

– 9W 1

. 1 .4.5 Operating Temperature Range

- 14 0 F to 104 0 F (

- 10 0 C to 40 0 C) 1.1 .4.6 Battery

– 600mAh LiPo 2S

1.1.5 Intelligent Flight Battery (Model: TB47) 1.1.5.1 Capacity

– 4500mAh 1.1.5.2 Voltage

– 22 .2V 1.1.5.3 Battery Type

– LiPo 6S High voltage battery 1.1.5.4 Energy

– 99.9Wh 1.1.5.5 Net Weight

– 570g 1.1.5.6 Operating Temge

- 14 0 F to 104 0 F (

- 10 0 C to 40 0 C) 1.1.5.7 Max Charging Power

– 180W

1.1. 6 Intelligent Flight Battery (Model: TB48) 1.1. 6 .1 Capacity

– 5700mAh 1.1.6 .2 Voltage

– 22.8V 1.1.6 .3 Battery Type

– LiPo 6S High voltage battery 1.1.6 .4 Energy

– 129.6Wh 1.1.6.5 Net Weight

– 670g 1.1.6.6 Operating Temge

- 14 0 F to 104 0 F (

- 10 0 C to 40 0 C) 1.1.6.7 Max Charging Power

– 180W35 APPENDIX

– B

DJI Inspire 1 Manufacturer’s User Manual ( Please see attachment )36 APPENDIX

– C