alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-20413-CR-GAYLES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

LESTER DELGADO ECHEVARRIA.

__________________________________/

OBJECTIONS TO PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT

COMES NOW the Defendant, Lester Delgado Echevarria ("Mr. Delgado"), by and 

through undersigned counsel objects to the Presentence Investigation Report ("PSR") and states: 

1. Mr. Delgado objects to PSR paragraph 37 which establishes a loss of more than 

$1,500,000 but no more than $3,500,000. After a careful review of the discovery and all the 

relevant issues having to do with this enhancement, the parties agreed that the loss amount 

should be $550,000 to $1,500,000 million which enhances the guidelines level by 14 levels. The 

parties are in a better position to weigh the facts of the case and implications of the guidelines.

Nothing has changed that would suggest that the parties were wrong in their agreement. The 

Court should sustain the objection.

2. Mr. Delgado objects to PSR paragraph 38 which enhances the guideline level by 2 

levels because it involved 10 or more victims. Paragraph 31 of the PSR states clearly that the 

victims in this offense are the Centers for Medicare ("CMS") and Medicaid services and 3 other 

individuals. The fraud was directed at Medicare, it was CMS who paid the monies, and

paragraph 33 states that the restitution order should award restitution only to CMS. In any event,

the listed victims in the paragraph are well below 10. The parties specifically agreed that this 

enhancement does not apply. Accordingly, the Court should sustain the objection.

Case 1:22-cr-20413-DPG Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/03/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

3. Mr. Delgado objects to PSR paragraph 47 which establishes the offense level at 21. 

Should the Court sustain the defense objections, the appropriate level would be 17 with a 

corresponding range of 24 to 30 months. 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was provided to all 

relevant parties herein via the CM/ECF system.

Respectfully submitted,

JUAN DE JESUS GONZALEZ, LAWYER, PA

Attorney for Lester Delgado Echevarria

2460 S.W. 137 Avenue, Suite 254

Miami, Florida 33175

305-596-4500 office

305-596-4515 fax

786-486-9708 cell

JuanGonzalezLaw@aol.com

/s/ Juan de Jesus Gonzalez

___________________________________

Juan de Jesus Gonzalez, Lawyer

FBN 371904

Case 1:22-cr-20413-DPG Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/03/2023 Page 2 of 2
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-41212

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SEBASTIAN LOPEZ-ALFARO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-563-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sebastian LopezAlfaro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez-Alfaro has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                           7,807
<SECURITIES>                                    24,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    100,299
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,334
<PP&E>                                         116,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 334,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,724
<BONDS>                                        103,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   334,282
<SALES>                                        197,105
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               198,612
<CGS>                                          137,157
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,451
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,773
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                931
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       931
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ACT MEETING

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, June 19, 2000.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:   
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: June 9, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-15059 Filed 6-9-00; 4:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 102-75.95 Can Federal agencies that normally do not require real property (other than for office, storage, and related purposes) or that may not have statutory authority to acquire such property, obtain the use of excess real property?

Yes, GSA can authorize the use of excess real property for an approved program. See § 102-75.240.
#### § 102-118.595 May my agency appeal a prepayment audit decision by the CBCA?

No, your agency may not appeal a prepayment audit decision. Your agency must follow the ruling of the CBCA.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 30476, June 26, 2009]
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT QUICK GUIDE 

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT QUICK GUIDE
 

Overview 

As a Social Innovation Fund (SIF) grantee, you will need a financial management system that will meet the 

Federal grant management requirements. According to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circulars, 

your financial management system should: 

•	 Identify the source and application of funds for Federally-sponsored activities including information 

about the total Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, receipts, 

expenditures, outlays, income and interest 

•	 Provide effective control over, safeguarding of and accountability for all funds, property and assets 

•	 Verify that the assets and funds are used for authorized purposes 

•	 Include written procedures to minimize the time elapsed between receiving Federal funds and dispensing 

them for program purposes 

•	 Address procedures for determining the reasonableness, allocability, and allowability of costs in 

accordance with the applicable cost principles and the terms and conditions of the award
 

Financial Management Systems Minimum Requirements 

In particular, your accounting system should: 

•	 Distinguish between grant versus non-grant related expenditures 

•	 Identify costs by program year 

•	 Identify costs by budget category 

•	 Differentiate between direct and indirect (administrative) costs 

•	 Easily provide management with financial reports at both the summary and detailed levels 

•	 Compare expenditures with budget amounts for each award (budget vs. actual reports) 

•	 Correlate financial reports submitted to the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) 

directly to accounting information and supporting documents (e.g., receipts and invoices) 

•	 Track the 1:1 cash match required by SIF for both the intermediary and subgrantees to ensure that all 

match funds are: 

Verifiable from your record Allowable under applicable Part 200 Cost Principle 

Necessary and reasonable Provided for in the approved budget 

As a SIF grantee, you will need to incorporate these requirements and document them in your policies and 

procedures manual. 

nationalservice.gov/SIF
#### § 101-30.101-1a Item of production.

*Item-of-production* means those articles, equipment, materials, parts, pieces, or objects produced by a manufacturer which conform to the same engineering drawing, standard, or specification and receive the same quality control and inspection.

[46 FR 35644, July 10, 1981]
GAO/AIMD-00-220R National Conference on Citizenship

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

Accounting and Information

Management Division

B-285346

June 16, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the National Conference on Citizenship for Fiscal Years 1998 and 1999

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the National

Conference on Citizenship, a federally chartered corporation, for the fiscal years ended

June 30, 1998 and 1999. The corporation’s purpose is to promote citizenship throughout the

country.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the corporation’s

income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditor’s report and the corporation’s financial statements to the Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with the

financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we reviewed the

corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes, performed certain analytical

procedures related to information presented in the financial statements, reviewed the

auditor’s report, and made inquiries to corporation officials or the auditor as we deemed

necessary. We did not review the auditor’s working papers. Our review disclosed no

reportable instances of noncompliance.
B-285346

Page 2 GAO/AIMD-00-220R National Conference on Citizenship

The audit report included the auditor’s opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with generally

accepted accounting principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

David L. Clark

Director, Audit Oversight and Liaison

w/o Enclosure

(911975)
11/03/2010 11:38 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS 31001/002 

O 

U S. r^eDOrrmpnt 

O" TfCnsociiTQJior; 

Federal Aviolion 

Adminlsirotion 

SeuThwesl Region 

Now Mexico, Oklalioma 

Tuxat 

Oclober27, 2010 

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Adminisiratlon 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-iSQ 

Faderal Avifliion AdmmisiMlion 

Souniwest Reqion 

Off'oe of Peoionol Counsel. AiiW 

2601 MejcJuni eivJ 

^'o^ worm, 1X76137 

1 

XI 

__ 

• " 

UJ 

ro 

7 

N

T OF 

FATIO^ 

RATIO 

:^:-^ CO 

In the Mailer of: Continental Airlines, Inc. 

Docket No, CP 

Case No. 2009SW270202 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

(Lfi04wot>a/j^/o- ofif 

We are resending this cover letter with corrections to be attached with the above 

referenced complaint. The cover letter that was previously sent to you on 

October 13, 2010, contained a scrivener's error as Houston Helicopters was 

incorrectly referenced instead of Continental Airlines. Inc. The case number remains 

the sameEnclosed are the original and one copy of the complaint in the above-referenced 

proceeding. 

The Complainant requests that the hearing in this matter be held in the Houston, Texas 

area, and expects that the hearing will last one day. 

Please serve me with all documents in this matter. 

Sincerely, 

LYNETTE WORD 

Regional Counsel 

By: 

-jo* ^ Tim Duff 

Attorney 

Cc: 

President Continental Airlines 

Thomas Boiling 
11/03/2010 11:38 FAX 2024935142 FAA •* DMS gl002/002 

Page 1 of 1 

Name change 

Patricia. Matthews 

to; 

Stephanie McClain 

10/27/2010 12:14 PM 

Cc: 

Aileen C Ayala, Michael. Welter 

Sho^v Details 

History: This message has been replied to. 

Hi, Stephanie. Please change the name of Case No. 2009SW270202, CP10SW0012, F/\A-2010-0979 from 

Houston Helicopters to Continental Airlines. The regional office made a mistake. They are going to forward a 

new cover page. 

Thanks so much! 

PcvtricCo/ MoMheAvy 

Departinent of Transportation 

Office of Hearings 

202-366-512 1 

lile://C:\Document.s and Settings\Slcphanie McClain\Local SettingsVl'cmp\nolcsC7A056\... 10/28/2010
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 7327

MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER STOFFA , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. JEFFERY B. KISER, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 2:16

- cv - 00207

- MSD

- RJK )

Submitted : April 25, 2017 Decided: May 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jonathan P. Sheldon, SHELDON, FLOOD & HAYWOOD, PLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Rosemary Virginia Bourne, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpu blished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Christopher Stoffa seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)

. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or w rong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable , and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stoffa has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifica te of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -

NO. 15-0436

JOHNESHA MILLER

v.

DART AREA RAPID TRANSIT §

§

§

§

§

§ Dallas County,

5th District.

July 31, 2015

Petitioner 's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

(Justice Jeff V. Brown not sitting)

         

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE

, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, JOHNESHA MILLER, pay all costs incurred on this

petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 11th day of September, 2015

.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
§ 50.1 Establishment and duties of Board. ( a ) A Retiring Review Board, referred to in this part as the Board, is hereby established in the Coast Guard.
( b ) It will be the duty of the Board to review, at the request of any Coast Guard member or former member retired or released to inactive service, without pay, for physical disability, pursuant to the decision of a retiring board, the findings and decision of the retiring board. The term “retired or released to inactive service” includes every kind of separation from the service.
( c ) After reviewing the findings and decision of a retiring board the Board will affirm or reverse, in whole or in part, the findings and decision of the retiring board.
( d ) In carrying out its duties the Board shall have the same powers as exercised by, or vested in, the retiring board whose findings and decision are being reviewed.
[10 FR 5650, May 17, 1945, as amended by USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44278, July 27, 2015]
#### § 101-26.202 Applicability.

The FEDSTRIP system shall be used by civilian agencies to requisition any item from GSA or to requisition any specifically authorized item from Department of Defense (DOD). Requisitions to the Veterans Administration (VA) should be submitted on punched cards in FEDSTRIP format or typed on Standard Form 147, Order for Supplies or Services.

[43 FR 19853, May 9, 1978]
#### § 102-73.100 Is the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984, as amended (CICA), applicable to lease acquisition?

Yes, Executive agencies must obtain full and open competition among suitable locations meeting minimum Government requirements, except as otherwise provided by CICA, 41 U.S.C. 253.
§ 102-117.45 What other factors must I consider when using another agency's contract or rate tender? When using another agency's contract or rate tender, you must: ( a ) Assure that the contract or rate tender meets any special requirements unique to your agency;
( b ) Pay any other charges imposed by the other agency for external use of their contract or rate tender;
( c ) Ensure the terms of the other agency's contract or rate tender allow you to use it; and
( d ) Ensure that the agency offering this service has the authority or a delegation of authority from GSA to offer such services to your agency.
[65 FR 60061, Oct. 6, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 51393, Aug. 20, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001003740
<NAME>                        The Ashton Technology Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1.000
<CASH>                                              60,841
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,545,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (62,500)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,642,907
<PP&E>                                           1,797,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                     755,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,366,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,990,474
<BONDS>                                             13,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            75,625
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,287,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,366,630
<SALES>                                          4,938,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,082,671
<CGS>                                            3,544,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,687,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   957,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39,792
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,602,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       110,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,842,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,832,406)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.93)