alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION

XYZ CORPORATION,

Plaintiff v

THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS 

AND UNINCORPORATEDASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”, 

Defendants/

/

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

Defendants, Def. No. 298, Rocita Home, Def. No. 290, LiuFJJMY, Def. No. 39, thomilliom, Def. No. 280, yunshanyun, Def. No. 299, KKRDH, Def. No. 19, FFSURE, Def. No. 297, 

JINLITECH, Def. No. 281, BEBOORE, Def. No. 291, Gowgelit, Def. No. 300, Kondyfayo design, Def. No. 181, comm1a, (collectively “11 Defendants”), by and through the undersigned 

counsel, hereby moves this Court for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the 

pleading pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 6(b) until March 8, 2023 to the Am. Complaint [DE 10-2]. And 

states as follows: 

1. Order [DE 71] granted the 11Defendants’ Motion to Extend [DE 69] and permitted the 11

Defendants to file a response before March 6, 2023. 

2. The 11 Defendants could not agree to whether or not to file a counterclaim until today.

CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-24013-RNS

Case 1:22-cv-24013-RNS Document 84 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/07/2023 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

3. The undersigned should have filed a motion for extension before last night, however, he

suffered an eye allergy last night and failed to do so. 

4. The undersigned requests the deadline to respond to the Amended Complaint be extended to 

Mar. 8, 2023. 

/s/ Jianyin Liu

FBN: 1007675

Jianyin Liu, Esq.

The Law Offices of James Liu, LLC 

15750 SW 92nd Ave Unit 20C 

Palmetto Bay, FL 33157 

Ph: (305) 209 6188

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD-FAITH CONFERENCE

 I certify that I have

conferred with the opposing party in good-faith via phone (picked up by a paralegal) and via

email to solve the issues and requested the the opposing counsel to reply to the undersigned’s 

email by 3:00 pm on March 7, 2023. Since the 11 Defendants filed an answer, affirmative 

defenses and counterclaim on Mar. 7, 2023 already, the undersigned felt it is necessary to file 

this motion to extend time in an expedited way. Maybe due to the time constraint and short 

notice, the opposing party could not respond in time. Until 3:00 PM on Mar. 7, 2023, the 

undersigned has not received the opposing counsel’s reply. Thus, this motion is filed without 

official answer from the opposing counsel. The undersigned apologized for the short notice. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent via CM/ECF on this March

7, 2023.

/s/ Jianyin Liu 

Jianyin Liu, Esq. 

Case 1:22-cv-24013-RNS Document 84 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/07/2023 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case 1:22-cv-24013-RNS Document 84 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/07/2023 Page 3 of 3
#### § 102-75.1270 How does an agency request a transfer of Federal real property?

Agencies must use GSA Form 1334, Request for Transfer of Excess Real and Related Personal Property.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of WAMEX Holdings, Inc. (“WAMEX”) because of questions regarding the accuracy of assertions by WAMEX, and by others, in documents sent to and statements made to market makers of the stock of WAMEX, other broker-dealers, and to investors concerning: (1) WAMEX's ability to comply with the Commission's regulations regarding the operation of an Alternative Trading System; and (2) funds purportedly raised by WAMEX from private investors. In addition, recent market activity in WAMEX securities may be the result of manipulative conduct or other illegal activity.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above listed company.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the Securities Act of 1934, that trading in the above listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, June 14, 2000 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on June 27, 2000.

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-15443  Filed 6-14-00; 4:59 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
From: Slocum, Benjamin [mailto:benjamin.slocum@usairways.coml 

Sent: Tuesday, April17, 2012 10:32 AM · 

To: Jaffe, Darren (OST) 

Subject: PSAAirlines Docket OST-2004-18811 (U.S.-Turks & Caicos) 

DarrenThis email will confirm that the services being applied for by PSA Airlines, Inc. ("PSA") in its Application 

for Renewal of an Exemption, in the above-referenced docket, will all be conducted doing business as US 

Airways Express. 

My apologies for any confusion. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. 

Ben 

Ben Slocum 

Director and Assistant General Counsel 

US Airways, Inc. 

Direct: 202-326-5154
RETURN OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 District of Florida

Copyright © 1992-2022 DreamBuilt Software, Inc. - Process Server's Toolbox V8.2k

Case Number: 1:22-CV-23115-JEM

BII2022015049

Plaintiff:

PANO CALAVRIAS

vs.

Defendant:

QUARANTENA LLC, ET AL

For:

Patricia Francois, Esq.

Demesmin & Dover, PLLC

1650 SE 17th Street

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316

Received by Burke Process Service on the 27th day of October, 2022 at 9:44 am to be served on PHILLIPS

MARINE GROUP LLC, 1000 5TH STREET, SUITE 200-E5, MIAMI BEACH, FL 33141.

I, Lazaro Ordaz, do hereby affirm that on the 4th day of November, 2022 at 3:50 pm, I:

CORPORATE: served by delivering a true copy of the Summons in a Civil Action and Second Amended 

Complaint with Exhibits with the date and hour of service endorsed thereon by me, to: Samantha Moreno as 

Secretary, employed therein and authorized to accept service for PHILLIPS MARINE GROUP LLC, at the 

address of: 1000 5TH STREET, SUITE 200-E5, MIAMI BEACH, FL 33141, and informed said person of the contents 

therein, in compliance with state statutes.

Description of Person Served: Age: 30, Sex: F, Race/Skin Color: Hispanic, Height: 5'4", Weight: 170, Hair: Black,

Glasses: N

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Return of Service and the facts stated are true 

and correct. NO NOTARY REQUIRED PURSUANT TO F.S. 92.525 (2). I certify that I am over the age of 18, have 

no interest in the above action and am a Process Server, in good standing, in the judicial circuit in which the process 

was served.

Lazaro Ordaz

# 2319

Burke Process Service

7200 W. Camino Real

Suite 102

Boca Raton, FL 33433

(954) 514-0116

Our Job Serial Number: BII-2022015049

Case 1:22-cv-23115-JEM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2022 Page 1 of 2
DELIVERED 11/4/2022 3:50 PM

SERVER LO

LICENSE # 2319

Case 1:22-cv-23115-JEM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2022 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF 
 INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
 JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
 STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   000003941                   
<NAME>                                  ALLIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  Jun-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.000
<CASH>                                          1,168
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  75,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                      680
<INVENTORY>                                    61,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              152,172
<PP&E>                                         94,698
<DEPRECIATION>                                 51,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                203,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         101,468
<BONDS>                                           393
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           94
<OTHER-SE>                                     92,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  203,051
<SALES>                                       149,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              149,783
<CGS>                                         112,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 112,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   76
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                17,773
<INCOME-TAX>                                    6,396
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            11,377
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,377
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.38
        



</TABLE>
#### § 101-39.200 Scope.

This subpart defines the procedures for acquiring motor vehicles and related services provided by the General Services Administration (GSA) Interagency Fleet Management System (IFMS). Local transportation services for Government personnel and property may be provided by the GSA IFMS to efficiently meet the authorized requirements of participating agencies. These services may be furnished through commercial rental companies, private sector fleet operators, local or interstate common carriers, the Government, or a combination of the above.

[56 FR 59888, Nov. 26, 1991]
#### § 102-73.285 [Reserved]
§ 102-83.120 What information and data must agencies provide to the Administrator of General Services, or other acquiring agency head, to comply with the provisions of this part? Efficient and effective space management of Federally owned and leased facilities through the activities described in this part requires that Federal agencies cooperate with acquiring agencies and furnish any related data and information requested by the acquiring agencies, to the extent not prohibited by law. This includes information or data that allows for: ( a ) Selecting, acquiring, managing, and disposing of Federal space in a manner that will foster the policies and programs of the Federal Government and improve the management and administration of Government activities;
( b ) Issuing regulations, standards and criteria for the selection, acquisition and management of Federally owned and leased space;
( c ) Surveying space requirements, space utilization and daily occupancy data of executive agencies;
( d ) Meeting essential space requirements in a manner that is economically feasible and prudent; and
( e ) Making maximum use of existing Federally controlled facilities that, in the acquiring agency head's judgment, are adequate or economically adaptable to meeting the space needs of executive agencies.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6644

JOHN MCCOMBS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. R. Bryan Harwell , Chief District Judge. ( 2:19

- cv
- 01086

- RBH )

Submitted : September 17, 2020 Decided: October 13, 2020

Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
John McCombs, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
John McCombs se eks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to
amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealab ility will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a petitioner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds,
the petitioner must demonstrate both that the dispositive proce dural ruling is debatabl e and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v.
Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the re cord and conclude that McCombs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material s before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 51119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20970]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7545]

U.S. Department of State Advisory Committee on Private 
International Law: Notice of Annual Meeting

    The Department of State's Advisory Committee on Private 
International Law (ACPIL) will hold its annual meeting on developments 
in private international law on Thursday, September 22 and Friday, 
September 23, 2011, in Washington, DC. The meeting will be held at the 
Gewirz Student Center, Georgetown University Law Center, 600 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20001. The program is scheduled to run from 
9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Thursday and from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. on Friday.
    Time permitting, we expect that the discussion will focus on 
developments in a number of areas, e.g., international family law; 
electronic commerce; regional inter-American issues; U.S. federalism 
issues in implementing private international law conventions; and 
current activities relating to private international law in various 
international and domestic organizations. We also intend to solicit 
proposals for new work in the PIL field. We encourage active 
participation by all those attending.
    Documents on these subjects are available at http://www.hcch.net; 
http://www.uncitral.org; http://www.unidroit.org; http://www.oas.org, 
and http://www.nccusl.org. We may, by e-mail, supplement those with 
additional documents.
    Please advise as early as possible if you plan to attend. The 
meeting is open to the public up to the capacity of the conference 
facility, and space will be reserved on a first come, first served 
basis. Persons who wish to have their views considered are encouraged, 
but not required, to submit written comments in advance. Those who are 
unable to attend are also encouraged to submit written views. Comments 
should be sent electronically to smeltzertk@state.gov. Those planning 
to attend should provide name, affiliation and contact information to 
Trisha Smeltzer at 202-776-8423 and Niesha Toms at 202-776-8420, or by 
e-mail to tomsnn@state.gov and smeltzertk@state.gov. You may also use 
those contacts to obtain additional information. A member of the public 
needing reasonable accommodation should advise those same contacts not 
later than September 13th. Requests made after that date will be 
considered, but might not be able to be fulfilled.

    Dated: August 4, 2011.
Keith Loken,
Assistant Legal Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of 
the Legal Adviser, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-20970 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7821** 

JAMES DENNIS PRICE , Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v. KAREN HOGSTEN, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Bluefield

. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 00646 )

Submitted : April 30, 2015 Decided: May 11, 2015

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
James Dennis Price, Appellant Pro Se. John Fulton Gianola, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circui t.2 PER CURIAM:
James Dennis Price , a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denyin g relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) p etition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Price v. Hogsten , No. 1:12

- cv - 00646 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 27,
2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contenti ons are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Greenberg Traurig, P.A.  333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 4400  Miami, Florida 33131  Tel 305.579.0500  Fax 305.579.0717  www.gtlaw.com 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

RICCARDO SILVA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MOBILE BILLBOARDS, INC., et al., 

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:22-cv-24262-RKA 

NOTICE OF FILING UNREDACTED COMPLAINT 

Plaintiff, Riccardo Silva (“Silva”) hereby files a copy of the unredacted Complaint as 

Exhibit A pursuant to this Court’s Order dated January 1, 2023 (the “Order”) [ECF No. 4]. 

Silva notes to the Court that it was his prior intention to file his Complaint with redactions, 

to be followed by a motion to file portions of the Complaint under seal, given the sensitive nature 

of the false and defamatory accusations therein. Upon further consideration, though, including the 

Court’s Order and relevant case law, Silva is filing the Complaint without any redactions. 

Case 1:22-cv-24262-RKA Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/04/2023 Page 1 of 2
2 

Greenberg Traurig, P.A.  333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 4400  Miami, Florida 33131  Tel 305.579.0500  Fax 305.579.0717  www.gtlaw.com

Dated: January 4, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Joshua M. Mandel 

GREENBERG TRAURIG, PA 

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 4400 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 579-0570 

Facsimile: (305) 961-5702 

THOMAS R. HEISLER 

Florida Bar No. 1029852 

Thomas.Heisler@gtlaw.com 

BENJAMIN GREENBERG 

Florida Bar No. 192732 

greenbergb@gtlaw.com

JOSHUA M. MANDEL 

Florida Bar No. 1031396 

mandelj@gtlaw.com 

michelle.cruz@gtlaw.com 

fernandezf@gtlaw.com 

FLService@gtlaw.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff Riccardo Silva 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 4, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

was filed via CM/ECF and will be served via UPS to: 

Defendant Mobile Billboards, Inc. 

8955 Hwy 301 N. 

Ste. 210 

Parrish, FL 34219 

and 

c/o Registered Agents Inc. 

3030 N. Rocky Point Dr., Ste. 150A 

Tampa, FL 33607 

/s/ Joshua M. Mandel 

JOSHUA M. MANDEL

Case 1:22-cv-24262-RKA Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/04/2023 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:22-cr-14061-AMC Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 1 of 4
 

22-CR-14061-CANNON/MAYNARD

Case 2:22-cr-14061-AMC Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:22-cr-14061-AMC Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:22-cr-14061-AMC Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                      |  |                                            |  |                    
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------
|                                      |  | State or OtherJurisdiction ofIncorporation |  | PercentageOwnership
|Parent                                |  |                                            |  |                    
|Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.                |  | Maryland                                   |  |                   
|                                      |  |                                           
|Subsidiary (1)                        |  |                                            |  |                    
|The Patapsco Bank                     |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100%               
|                                      |  |                                           
|Subsidiaries of The Patapsco Bank (1) |  |                                            |  |                    
|PFSL Holding Corp.                    |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100%               
|Prime Business Leasing                |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100%               
|Patapsco Financial Services, Inc.     |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100%               

---

|(1) | The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report to Stockholders attached hereto as
Exhibit 13.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7425
ROGER LEE ARBOGAST, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES A. CHEEKS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-03-2221-9-24) Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 6, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Lee Arbogast, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Roger Lee Arbogast appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Arbogast v. Cheeks , No. CA-03-2221-9-24 (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED