alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 101-6.500 Scope of subpart. ( a ) In accordance with Public Law 96-303, the requirements of this section shall apply to all executive agencies (as defined by section 105 of title 5, United States Code), the United States Postal Service, and the Postal Rate Commission. The heads of these agencies shall be responsible for ensuring that the requirements of this section are observed and complied with within their respective agencies.
( b ) Each agency, as defined in “(a)” above, shall display in appropriate areas of buildings in which at least 20 individuals are regularly employed by an agency as civilian employees, copies of the Code of Ethics for Government Service (Code).
( c ) For Government-owned or wholly leased buildings subject to the requirements of this section, at least one copy of the Code shall be conspicuously displayed, normally in the lobby of the main entrance to the building. For other buildings subject to the requirements of this section which are owned, leased, or otherwise provided to the Federal Government for the purpose of performing official business, at least one copy of the Code shall be conspicuously displayed within the space occupied by the Government. In all cases, additional copies of the Code may be displayed in other appropriate building locations, such as auditoriums, bulletin boards, cafeterias, locker rooms, reception areas, and other high-traffic areas.
( d ) Agencies of the Federal Government shall not pay any costs for the printing, framing, or other preparation of the Code. Agencies may properly pay incidental expenses, such as the cost of hardware, other materials, and labor incurred to display the Code. Display shall be consistent with the decor and architecture of the building space. Installation shall cause no permanent damage to stonework or other surfaces which are difficult to maintain or repair.
( e ) Agencies may obtain copies of the Code by submitting a requisition for National Stock Number (NSN) 7690-01-099-8167 in Fedstrip format to the GSA regional office responsible for providing support to the requisitioning agency. Agencies will be charged a nominal fee to cover shipping and handling.
[58 FR 21945, Apr. 28, 1994]
#### SOL KANTOR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE PERTH AMBOY NATIONAL BANK, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued March 12, 1951

Decided April 30, 1951.

*267Before Judges Jacobs, Eastwood and Bigelow.

*Mr. Sol Kanior*argued the cause *pro $e.*

*Mr. John T. Keefe*argued the cause for the appellants *(Mr. David T. Wilentz*and *Mr. Edmund A. Ilayes,*attorneys).

Per Curtaii.

The principal question is whether a county board of elections may have a branch office away from the county seat. The Board of Chosen Freeholders of Middlesex County leased from the Perth Amboy National Bank a suite of offices in Perth Amboy for the use of the board of elections. At the suit of a taxpayer, the Law Division awarded summary judgment setting aside the lease and enjoining the occupation of the suite by the election board and payment of the rent accruing after December 31, 1950. The learned judge who heard the case concluded that *B. S.*19:6-21 impliedly prohibited the leasing or occupation of offices outside of the county seat. That section directed that the county boards of elections be provided with an office “in the court house of the county for which they are respectively appointed, or in a building as near as possible adjacent thereto.” After the judgment was rendered and the appeal taken, the Legislature, by the enactment of *P. L.*1951, c. 10, amended *R. S.*19:6-21 by striking out the part above quoted and by directing that there be provided an office “or offices.” The clear intent and effect of the amendment is to authorize the freeholders to provide more than one office for the election board, and to remove any requirement that the, office be at the county seat. The case is governed by the law now in force and not the law prevailing when the judgment was entered. *Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United Electrical, etc.,*139 *N. J. Eq.*97*(E. & A.*1946); *Fusaro v. Reid,*2 *N. J. Super.*107*(App. Div.*1949); *Binetti v. Swenson,*3 *N. J. Super.*227*(App. Div.*1949). In order to bring the decision into harmony with the new enactment, the judgment is reversed, but without costs to any party either here or in the Law Division.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38859-38860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 8, 1999, and published in the Federal 
Register on October 18, 1999, (64 FR 56226), Chirex Technology Center, 
Inc., DBA Chirex Cauldron, 383 Phoenixville Pike, Malvern, Pennsylvania 
19355, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of 
amphetamine (1100), a basic class of controlled substance listed in 
Schedule II.
    The firm plans to bulk manufacture amphetamine and its salts for 
product development.

[[Page 38860]]

    DEA has considered the factors in title 21, United States Code, 
section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Chirex 
Technology Center, Inc., DBA Chirex Cauldron to manufacture amphetamine 
is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has 
investigated the firm to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the 
application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed above is 
granted.

    Dated: June 7, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-15688 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Form S-8 No. 333-12991) pertaining to the 1976 Employees' Incentive Stock
Option Plan and Directors' Stock Option Plan of Information International Inc.
assumed by Autologic Information International, Inc. and (Form S-8 No.
33-11565) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Autologic Information
International, Inc. and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-11547) and in the related Prospectuses of our
report dated December 19, 1996, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Autologic Information International, Inc. included in its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 1, 1996.

                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Woodland Hills, California
February 27, 1997
§ 80.757 Suncoast Keys, FL to Horseshoe Point, FL. ( a ) Except inside lines specifically decribed in this section, the 72 COLREGS shall apply on the bays, bayous, creeks, and marinas from the Suncoast Keys to Horseshoe Point.
( b ) A line formed by the centerline of Highway 44 Bridge over the Salt River.
( c ) A north-south line drawn through Crystal River Entrance Daybeacon 25 across the river entrance.
( d ) A north-south line drawn through the Cross Florida Barge Canal Daybeacon 48 across the canal.
( e ) A north-south line drawn through Withlacoochee River Daybeacon 40 across the river.
( f ) A line drawn from the westernmost extremity of South Point north to the shoreline across the Waccasassa River Entrance.
( g ) A line drawn from position latitude 29°16.6′ N., longitude 83°06.7′ W., 300° true to the shoreline of Hog Island.
( h ) A north-south line drawn through Suwannee River Mcgriff Pass Daybeacons 30 and 31 across the Suwannee River.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, as amended by CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7787, Mar. 6, 1986; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39172, July 1, 2013]
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-12991) pertaining to the 1976 Employees' Incentive Stock
Option Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-11565) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option
Plan and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3/A No. 333-11547) and in the related Prospectus of our report dated December
8, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Autologic Information International, Inc. and subsidiaries included in its
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended November 3, 2000.

                                       Ernst & Young LLP





Woodland Hills, California
January 25, 2001
§ 102-34.340 Do we need a fleet management information system? Yes, you must have a fleet management information system at the department or agency level that — ( a ) Identifies and collects accurate inventory, cost, and use data that covers the complete lifecycle of each motor vehicle (acquisition, operation, maintenance, and disposal); and
( b ) Provides the information necessary to satisfy both internal and external reporting requirements, including: ( 1 ) Cost per mile;
( 2 ) Fuel costs for each motor vehicle; and
( 3 ) Data required for FAST (see § 102-34.335).
#### § 3022.11 Service.

Any person filing a complaint must simultaneously serve a copy of the complaint on the Postal Service at this address: *PRCCOMPLAINTS@usps.gov.* A person without internet access may contact the Secretary to obtain approval for alternative methods of service.

[85 FR 9655, Feb. 19, 2020]
Exhibit
32


American
Airlines, Inc.


Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)








Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of American Airlines, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Form
10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April
16, 2009             
 /s/ Gerard J.
Arpey


Gerard J. Arpey


Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer





Date:  April
16, 2009    /s/ Thomas W.
Horton


Thomas W. Horton


Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer











The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q
or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 21

                 Subsidiaries of Muehlstein Holding Corporation

      The following is a list of the full name and the state or other
jurisdiction of incorporation for all subsidiaries of Muehlstein Holding
Corporation as they exist as of December 31, 1996.

Muehlstein & Co., Inc.
Also does business as: Channel Polymers
New York

Muehlstein International, Ltd.
New York

Muehlstein & Co. (Canada) Ltd.
Ontario, Canada

Pegasus Polymers International, Inc.
Connecticut

Pegasus Polymers Italia SrL
Italy

Pegasus Polymers France S.A.R.L.
France

Pegasus Polymers (U.K.) Limited
United Kingdom

Muehlstein Do Brasil Industria, Comercio e Representacoes Ltda.
Brazil

Pegasus Polymers Asia Limited
Hong Kong

Pegasus Polymers Benelux, Inc.
Delaware

Pegasus Polymers Iberica S.L.
Spain

Pegasus Polymers Marketing GmbH
Germany
<PAGE>

MTR Ltd.
Channel Islands

Muehlstein de Chile S.A.
Chile

Muehlstein de Colombia S.A.
Colombia

Muehlstein de Ecuador S.A.
Ecuador

Muehlstein de Guatemala S.A.
Guatemala

Muehlstein de Mexico S.A.
Mexico

Muehlstein de Peru S.A.
Peru

Muehlstein de Puerto Rico Inc.
Puerto Rico

Muehlstein de Costa Rica, S.A.
Costa Rica

Muehlstein Argentina S.A.
Argentina

Muehlstein Financial Corporation
Delaware

Polymers International Financial Corporation
Delaware

Pegasus Polymers International Coordination, Inc.
Delaware
§ 105-71.144 Termination for convenience. Except as provided in § 105-71.143 awards may be terminated in whole or in part only as follows: ( a ) By the awarding agency with the consent of the grantee or subgrantee in which case the two parties shall agree upon the termination conditions, including the effective date and in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated, or
( b ) By the grantee or subgrantee upon written notification to the awarding agency, setting forth the reasons for such termination, the effective date, and in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated. However, if, in the case of a partial termination, the awarding agency determines that the remaining portion of the award will not accomplish the purposes for which the award was made, the awarding agency may terminate the award in its entirety under either § 105-71.143 or paragraph (a) of this section.
§ 155.240 Damage stability information for oil tankers and offshore oil barges. ( a ) Owners or operators of oil tankers and offshore oil barges shall ensure that their vessels have prearranged, prompt access to computerized, shore-based damage stability and residual structural strength calculation programs.
( b ) Vessel baseline strength and stability characteristics must be pre-entered into such programs and be consistent with the vessel's existing configuration.
( c ) Access to the shore-based calculation program must be available 24 hours a day.
( d ) At a minimum, the program must facilitate calculation of the following: ( 1 ) Residual hull girder strength based on the reported extent of damage.
( 2 ) Residual stability when the vessel's compartments are breached.
( 3 ) The most favorable off-loading, ballasting, or cargo transfer sequences to improve residual stability, reduce hull girder stresses, and reduce ground-force reaction.
( 4 ) The bending and shear stresses caused by pinnacle loads from grounding or stranding.
[CGD 90-068, 58 FR 67996, Dec. 22, 1993, as amended by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35531, June 30, 1998]
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**703 KA 09-01467**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
SAMUEL L. HODGES, ALSO KNOWN AS COUNTRY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

KEVIN J. BAUER, ALBANY, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (J. MICHAEL MARION OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), rendered June 25, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
§ 105-74.225 What actions must I take concerning employees who are convicted of drug violations in the workplace? There are two actions you must take if an employee is convicted of a drug violation in the workplace: ( a ) First, you must notify Federal agencies if an employee who is engaged in the performance of an award informs you about a conviction, as required by § 105-74.205(c)(2), or you otherwise learn of the conviction. Your notification to the Federal agencies must— ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Include the employee's position title;
( 3 ) Include the identification number(s) of each affected award;
( 4 ) Be sent within ten calendar days after you learn of the conviction; and
( 5 ) Be sent to every Federal agency on whose award the convicted employee was working. It must be sent to every awarding official or his or her official designee, unless the Federal agency has specified a central point for the receipt of the notices.
( b ) Second, within 30 calendar days of learning about an employee's conviction, you must either_ ( 1 ) Take appropriate personnel action against the employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), as amended; or
( 2 ) Require the employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for these purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

166)IV-E-39 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:56 PM Sheet 166 of 242 
*<*D

 «<>,. 

P.2 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

A N N ARBOR. MICHIGA N 48105 

MAY I 6 1988 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Transmittal of Videocassette of the EPA/MVMA Onboard 

Refueling Meeting - April 13, 1988 

FROM: Alan Schuler, Mechanical Engineer 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

JJ..-L 

?0: 

THRU: 

Public Docket A-87-11 

') '- / 

John F. Anderson, Senior Project Manager y]^^\^ \CLAiM^^A^ 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

This memorandum accompanies a 2 hour and 10 minute 

videocassette tape (1/2 - inch, VHS) of a meeting between 

representatives from EPA, the Motor Vehicle Manufacturers 

Association (MVMA), and various automotive manufacturers. This 

meeting was held on April 13, 1988 at EPA's Motor Vehicle 

Emission Laboratory in Ann Arbor, Michigan. EPA discussed s 

newly developed onboard system to control refueling emissions, 

displayed related hardware, reported, test results and answered 

questions.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-12991) pertaining to the 1976 Employees' Incentive Stock
Option Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-11565) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option
Plan and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-3/A No. 333-11547, Form S-3 No. 333-11547, and Form S-4 No. 33-99278) and in
the related Prospectuses of our report dated December 10, 1997, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Autologic Information
International, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
October 31, 1997.

                                       Ernst & Young LLP





Woodland Hills, California
January 27, 1998
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**The Partners**

DukeRealty Limited Partnership:

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-37920-01 onForm S-3 of Duke Realty Limited Partnership of our report dated January 30,2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Duke Realty LimitedPartnership and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, partners’ equity, and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and therelated schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual reporton Form 10-K of Duke Realty Limited Partnership.

 

KPMG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

March 25, 2002

 

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Catalogsof meteor radiants**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
1SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:3/2
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001060306
 
June 14, 2018
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5355

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

127 Social Street in Woonsocket, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Alphonse F.

Auclair Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 2000

Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 127 Social Street in Woonsocket, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Alphonse F. Auclair Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ALPHONSE F. AUCLAIR POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING.

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

6 Postal Service located at 127 Social Street in Woonsocket,

7 Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Al8 phonse F. Auclair Post Office Building’’.
2

•HR 5355 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Alphonse F. Auclair

5 Post Office Building.

Æ