alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"agency":"CNCS","generated":"2021-01-07 20:28:02","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2021"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"5"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CNCS"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["15"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["7"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["7"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2021","quarter":"Q1"}
#### § 102-75.820 Which Federal agency is eligible to receive surplus real and related personal property for the development or operation of a port facility?

Under 40 U.S.C. 554, the Administrator of General Services, the Secretary of the Department of Defense (in the case of property located at a military installation closed or realigned pursuant to a base closure law), or their designee, may assign to the Secretary of the Department of Transportation (DOT) for conveyance, without monetary consideration, to any State, or to governmental bodies, any political subdivision, municipality, or instrumentality, surplus real and related personal property, including buildings, fixtures, and equipment situated on the property, that DOT recommends as being needed for the development or operation of a port facility.
§ 105-55.019 Compromise of claims. ( a ) The standards set forth in this section apply to the compromise of debts pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3711. The General Services Administration (GSA) may exercise such compromise authority for debts arising out of activities of, or referred or transferred for collection services to, the Agency when the amount of the debt then due, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, does not exceed $100,000 or any higher amount authorized by the Attorney General. The Administrator may designate other GSA officials to exercise the authorities in this section.
( b ) Unless otherwise provided by law, when the principal balance of a debt, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, exceeds $100,000 or any higher amount authorized by the Attorney General, the authority to accept the compromise rests with the Department of Justice. GSA will evaluate the compromise offer, using the factors set forth in § 105-55.020. If an offer to compromise any debt in excess of $100,000 is acceptable to the Agency, GSA will refer the debt to the Civil Division or other appropriate litigating division in the Department of Justice using a Claims Collection Litigation Report. The referral will include appropriate financial information and a recommendation for the acceptance of the compromise offer. Justice Department approval is not required if GSA rejects a compromise offer.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
unaudited  consolidated  balance sheet of AT&T Corp. at September 30, 1999,  and
the unaudited  consolidated  statement of income for the nine-month period ended
September  30,  1999,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such
financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,488
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,040
<PP&E>                                         65,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                 28,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,515
<BONDS>                                        22,073
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          6,346
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,461
<OTHER-SE>                                     70,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   161,806
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               46,057
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  37,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,077
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,679
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,479
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,479
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.39


</TABLE>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-0567; Dir ID 2010-NM-272-AD
#### § 102-74.550 What items are permittees responsible for furnishing?

Permittees are responsible for furnishing items such as tickets, audio-visual equipment, and other items that are necessary for the proposed use.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 20.6

[LOGO]  WFS FINANCIAL
        23 Pasteur
        P.O. Box 19604
        Irvine, CA 92618-3816
        (714) 727-1000


January 26, 1998

Chase Manhattan Bank of Delaware       Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
1201 Market Street                     99 Church Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801             New York, NY 10007

Bankers Trust Company                  Standard & Poor's Ratings Services
4 Albany Street                        A division of McGraw-Hill, Inc.
New York, New York 10015               25 Broadway
                                       New York, NY 10004

Financial Security Assurance Inc.
350 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022


Re:   Annual Statement as to Compliance for
      WFS Financial 1997-A Owner Trust


Dear Sir or Madam:

                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE

Pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement ("Agreement")
dated as of March 1, 1997, and to Section 3.09 of the Indenture ("Indenture"),
dated as of the same date, the undersigned officers of WFS Financial Inc
(the "Master Servicer") certify that:

        (i)   a review of the activities of the Master Servicer since the
closing date and of its performance under the Agreement and the Indenture has
been made under such officers' supervision, and

        (ii)  to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement and
the Indenture throughout such year and that no default under the Agreement or
the Indenture has occurred.


/s/ Lee A. Whatcott                        /s/ Mark Olson
------------------------------             ----------------------------------
Lee A. Whatcott                            Mark Olson
Executive Vice President & CFO             Senior Vice President & Controller


cc:   A. Katz, Esq.
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Everyone: 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:14 PM 

Matthew Leitner (mleitner@co.del-norte.ca.us); Ron Gastineau 

(rgastineau@cc.crescentcity.org) -· 

Scott Bl~omquist (Scott.Bioomquist@penair.com); Tim Sieber (tim@seaportair.com); 

Kent Craford (kent@flyalaskaseaplanes.com); Greg Atkin; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

Essential Air Service at Crescent City 

SeaPort EAS Proposal at CEC- February 17, 2015.pdf; Alaska Seaplanes Crescent City 

EAS Proposal 2-17-15.pdf; PenAir proposal at CEC- February 17, 2015.pdf 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Crescent City and give you an opportunity to 

offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation 

and International Affairs. We issued Order 2014-11-18 on November 25, 2014, prohibiting SkyWest Airlines (the 

incumbent air carrier) from terminating service and requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EAS for a 

new term. In response to our request, three air carriers submitted proposals: Alaska Seaplanes, Peninsula Airways, and 

SeaPort Airlines. 

I have attached each airline's bid for your review and I expect it to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime this 

afternoon. I request that you review each proposal carefully and submit any comments you may have as soon as 

possible, but no later than Wednesday, March 11. Please send your comments directly to me via e-mail at 

michael.f.martin@dot.gov. Also, please forward this e-mail to all relevant parties that I have not included on the 

distribution list. 

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. 

Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494 

1
City Commission Marked Agenda May 11, 2023

City of Miami Page 1 Printed on 05/19/2023

City Hall

3500 Pan American Drive

Miami, FL 33133

https://miamifl.iqm2.com

City of Miami 

Marked Agenda

City Commission

Francis X. Suarez, Mayor

Christine King, Chair, District Five

Joe Carollo, Vice Chair, District Three

Alex Diaz de la Portilla, Commissioner, District One

Sabina Covo, Commissioner, District Two

Manolo Reyes, Commissioner, District Four

Arthur Noriega, V, City Manager

Victoria Méndez, City Attorney

Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk

Thursday, May 11, 2023, 9:00 AM City Hall 

9:00 AM INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Present: Chairwoman King, Commissioner Diaz de la Portilla, Commissioner Covo and 

Commissioner Reyes

Absent: Vice Chair Carollo

On the 11th day of May 2023, the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, met at its 

regular meeting place in City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida, in regular 

session. The Commission Meeting was called to order by Chairwoman King at 9:11 a.m. and 

adjourned at 12:47 p.m. 

Note for the Record: Commissioner Diaz de La Portilla entered the Commission chambers at 

11:09 a.m.

ALSO PRESENT:

Arthur Noriega, V, City Manager

Victoria Méndez, City Attorney

Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 82-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
OAR Box 1413 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

94) 11-1-95 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/9/2008 3:11:24 PM Sheet 94 of 114 

p.1 
P.2 

1 M4-S^ 

i 

Volume 

3 TDET 02336^ ^ 2 

.• ' . i • « 

* T V 4 i Testing, and B 

/ / / 

fc IV w 

^•m ^ 

*«? * % 1 

* 1 «M A 1 

^ 

--Wet \W^r ' .^^ B 

, ^ 

" m WA 

9a ' 

t "i WJ 'Mi 

* 

* 

»X-c' >•"'• •'. 

li 

.feitiraJfr 4tft* 

(•••IHIHB 
P.3 

I^^^^^^^^IM 

Composite Materials, 

VolumW 1: 

Properties, Nondestructive 

Testing, and Repair 

MEL M. SCHWARTZ 

To join a Prentice Hall PTR mailing list, point to: 

http://www.prenhall.com/register 

ff 

Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 

http://www.prenhall.com 
P.4 

77) 

,C(PS37 

v/l 

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data 

Schwartz, Mel M. 

Composite materials / Mel Schwartz. 

p. cm. 

Includes bibliographical references and index. 

Contents: v. 1. Properties, nondestructive testing, and repair. 

ISBN 0-13-300047-8 

1. Composite materials. I. Title. 

TA418.9.C6S37 1996 

620.H8—dc20 96-28559 

CIP 

Acquisitions editor: Bernard M. Goodwin 

Editorial/production supervision 

and interior design: bookworks 

Manufacturing manager: Alexis Heydt 

Cover design: Scoff Weiss 

Cover design director: Jerry Votta 

The background material on the cover is a reproduction ofa photograph of Kevlar, a 

fiber produced by DuPont which typifies raw materials used to fabricate composite parts. 

The Kevlar displayed here is used by Sikorsky Aircraft in the manufacturing of helicopter 

parts. Photograph courtesy of Sikorsky Aircraft. 

© 1997 by Prentice Hall PTR 

Prentice-Hall, Inc. 

A Simon & Schuster Company 

Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 

The publisher offers discounts on this book when ordered 

in bulk quantities. For more information, contact: 

Corporate Sales Department 

PTR Prentice Hall 

One Lake St. 

Upper Saddle River. NJ 07458 

Phone: 800-382-3419 

FAX: 201-236-7141 

E-mail: corpsales@prenhall.com 

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be 

reproduced, in any form or by any means, 

without permission in writing firom the publisher. 

Printed in the United States of America 

10 98765432 1 

ISBN 0-13-300017- 6 

Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited, London 

Prentice-Hall of Australia Pty. Limited, Sydney 

Prentice-Hall Canada Inc., Toronto _ 

Prentice-Hall Hispanoamericana, S.A., Mexico 

Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi 

Prentice-Hall of Japan, Inc., Tokyo 

Simon & Schuster Asia Pte. Ltd., Singapore 

Editora Prentice-Hall do Brasil, Ltda., Rio de Janeiro 

W*&^ .tiamBu ^mmi£>
§ 3010.163 Motions for late acceptance. ( a ) Any person may file a motion requesting that the Commission or the presiding officer accept any material filed by that person after an established filing deadline.
( b ) The motion should be filed prior to or concurrent with the filing of any material filed after the established deadline.
( c ) The Commission or the presiding officer are under no obligation to further consider any material filed after an established deadline, unless late acceptance is approved by the Commission or presiding officer. Posting late filed material to the Commission's website alone is not an indication that the material will be considered.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0486

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

RANDY JOE FISH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 2, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 24 2024

06/24/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0486
#### § 102-72.66 Do Executive agencies have a delegation of authority to perform ancillary repair and alteration projects in federally owned buildings under the jurisdiction, custody or control of GSA?

Yes. Executive agencies, as defined in § 102-71.20, are hereby delegated the authority to perform ancillary repair and alteration work in federally owned buildings under the jurisdiction, custody or control of GSA in accordance with the terms, conditions and limitations set forth in §§ 102-72.67 through 102-72.69.

[74 FR 12273, Mar. 24, 2009]
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc., as Assignee of Oraude Boston, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Citiwide Auto Leasing, Inc., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Korsunskiy Legal Group, P.C. (Henry R. Guindi of counsel), for appellant.Miller, Leiby &amp; Associates, P.C. (Melissa M. Wolin of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Theresa M. Ciccotto, J.), entered November 12, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs).</p><p>Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the affidavit submitted by the acupuncturist who was to perform the IMEs was sufficient to establish that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for the IMEs (<i>see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720, 722 [2006]). Furthermore, there is no merit to plaintiff's remaining argument that defendant was required to communicate with plaintiff's assignor's attorney pursuant to 11 NYCRR 65—3.6 (b). That subsection, which is not implicated here, requires an insurer to communicate with an applicant's attorney in certain situations involving claims that are tolled for outstanding verification. </p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed. </p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: June 01, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 697

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide that

any decision relating to the establishment or implementation of policies

of discipline of children with disabilities in school be reserved to each

State educational agency, or as determined by a State educational agency, to a local educational agency.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

to provide that any decision relating to the establishment

or implementation of policies of discipline of children

with disabilities in school be reserved to each State educational agency, or as determined by a State educational

agency, to a local educational agency.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 697 IH

1 SECTION 1. DISCIPLINE OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES

2 UNDER THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABIL3 ITIES EDUCATION ACT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 615 of the Individuals

5 with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1415) is

6 amended by striking subsection (k) and inserting the fol7 lowing:

8 ‘‘(k) DISCIPLINE OF CHILDREN WITH DISABIL9 ITIES.—

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any decision relating to the

11 establishment or implementation of policies of dis12 cipline of children with disabilities in school is re13 served to each State educational agency, or as deter14 mined by such a State educational agency, to a local

15 educational agency.

16 ‘‘(2) UNIFORMITY REQUIREMENT.—Any policy

17 of discipline of children with disabilities in school de18 scribed in paragraph (1) shall be applicable to all

19 children with disabilities in the State or local edu20 cational agency, as the case may be.’’.

21 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Individuals

22 with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.)

23 is amended—

24 (1) in section 615(j), by striking ‘‘Except as

25 provided in subsection (k)(7), during’’ and inserting

26 ‘‘During’’; and
3

•HR 697 IH

1 (2) in section 618(a)(1)(A)(vii)(I), by striking

2 ‘‘under subparagraphs (A)(ii) and (B) of section

3 615(k)(1), are removed to an interim alternative

4 educational setting’’ and inserting ‘‘, in accordance

5 with policies established and implemented under sec6 tion 615(k), are removed from the classroom’’.

Æ
#### § 101-6.300 Cross-reference to the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) 41 CFR chapter 102 parts 1 through 220.

For information on Federal facility ridesharing, *see* FMR part 102-74 (41 CFR part 102-74).
FY 2021 Q3 FOIA Quarterly Report

Agency

Corporation for National and Community Service

Reporting Quarter

2021 Q3

10 Oldest Requests

Did your agency have 10 or more perfected requests pending at the end of the last fiscal year? If so, please select 

the number 10. If your agency had fewer than 10, please select the correct number.

5

Of the ten or fewer requests identified in your previous response, please select the number of requests your 

agency has closed during the current fiscal year.

3

FOIA Requests Information

Component Requests Received in Requests Processed Requests Backlogged as of

Reporting Quarter in Reporting Quarter End of Reporting Quarter 

CNCS 3 5 12
#### § 102-73.250 Are agencies required to adhere to the policies for locating Federal facilities when purchasing buildings?

Yes, when purchasing buildings, agencies must comply with the location policies in this part and part 102-83 of this chapter.
§ 102-75.1125 Can the transfer/retransfer under this delegation be at no cost or without consideration? Yes, transfers/retransfers under this delegation can be at no cost or without consideration, except— ( a ) Where funds programmed and appropriated for acquisition of the property are available to the Secretary requesting the transfer or retransfer; or
( b ) Whenever reimbursement at fair market value is required by subpart B of this part (entitled “Utilization of Excess Real Property”).
#### § 105-1.100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart establishes the General Services Administration Property Management Regulations (GSPMR) and provides certain introductory material.
#### § 102-36.375 May we dispose of excess firearms?

Yes, unless you have specific statutory authority to do otherwise, excess firearms may be transferred only to those Federal agencies authorized to acquire firearms for official use. GSA may donate certain classes of surplus firearms to State and local government activities whose primary function is the enforcement of applicable federal, state, and/or local laws and whose compensated law enforcement officers have the authority to apprehend and arrest. Firearms not transferred or donated must be destroyed and sold as scrap. For additional guidance on the disposition of firearms refer to part 101-42 of this title.