alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Millennium Prime, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John Marchese, CEO and CFO of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/
      John F. MarcheseJohn
      F. Marchese CEO, CFO,principal
      executive officer,principal
      financial and accounting officerFebruary
      11, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that within
the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Alpine Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Steven S. Elbaum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: November 14, 2002 |  | /s/STEVEN S. ELBAUMSteven S. Elbaum
Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
1

Hutson, Nick

From: Hutson, Nick

Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 8:48 PM

To: Frey, Nathan J.

Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Fruh, Steve; 'Szabo, Aaron'

Subject: Updated version of 111(b) New/Mod/Recon preamble and Reg Text

Attachments: 111b preamble_DRAFT_072415_RLSO_compareto_071015.docx; 111b preamble_DRAFT_

072415_clean.docx; GHG_EGU_111(b)_Reg_Text_072415.docx

Nathan, 

Please find 3 attached files related to EO12866 review for 111(b) GHG standards for new, modified, and reconstructed 

EGUs 

1. A clean version of the DRAFT final preamble with responses to OMB/Interagency comments in marginal 

comment balloons. 

2. A redline strikeout (RLSO) showing changes in this 07/24/15 version as compared to the previous version that 

was submitted on 07/10/15 

3. A version of the 111(b) regulatory text showing changes. 

We expect some more minor changes to be made over the weekend as we continue to proofread and fill in a few gaps. I 

will provide you with updated versions to reflect those incremental changes - likely early Monday. 

Have a nice weekend, 

Nick 

Nick Hutson, PhD 

Energy Strategies Group 

Office of Air & Radiation 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

tel: +1 919 541 2968 

email: hutson.nick@epa.gov 

From: Hutson, Nick 

Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 5:50 PM 

To: 'Szabo, Aaron'; Frey, Nathan J. 

Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Fruh, Steve 

Subject: RE: Updated version of 111(b) New/Mod/Recon preamble and Reg Text 

Nathan, Aaron – 

The attached is our responses to Interagency Comments. You’ll see that the majority of comments have been 

responded to. 

There are still a few that we are still considering and we will provide updates to those few comments as soon as we can.

Have a nice weekend. 
2

Nick 

Nick Hutson, PhD 

Energy Strategies Group 

Office of Air & Radiation 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

tel: +1 919 541 2968 

email: hutson.nick@epa.gov

From: Hutson, Nick 

Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 5:08 PM 

To: Szabo, Aaron; Frey, Nathan J. 

Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Fruh, Steve 

Subject: Updated version of 111(b) New/Mod/Recon preamble and Reg Text 

Nathan and Aaron, 

Please find attached 3 files: 

1. A clean version of the DRAFT final 111(b) standards for new, modified, and reconstructed fossil fuel-fired EGUs 

2. A RLSO version that shows changes to the version that was previously submitted (note: formatting changes are 

not shown) 

3. A clean version of the accompanying rule language 

Our response to comments from the initial OMB/Interagency review will follow. 

Thanks, 

Nick 

Nick Hutson, PhD 

Energy Strategies Group 

Office of Air & Radiation 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

tel: +1 919 541 2968 

email: hutson.nick@epa.gov
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  

  

||
||
||
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 660 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 660

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

For the private relief of Ruth Hairston by waiver of a filing deadline 
  for appeal from a ruling relating to her application for a survivor 
                                annuity.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 660

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
For the private relief of Ruth Hairston by waiver of a filing deadline 
  for appeal from a ruling relating to her application for a survivor 
                                annuity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF DEADLINE FOR APPEAL.

    For purposes of a petition by Mrs. Ruth Hairston for review of the 
final order issued October 31, 1995, by the Merit Systems Protection 
Board with respect to its docket number SF-0831-95-0754-I-1, the 30-day 
filing deadline in section 7703(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code, 
is waived.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7639
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EMMANUEL IKECHUKWU ANUDU, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-305, CA-97-2051-JFM) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 25, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emmanuel Ikechukwu Anudu, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Anudu , Nos. CR-91-305; CA-97-2051-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

Case No. 1:22-cv-24023-SCOLA/GOODMAN 

KENNETH C. GRIFFIN,

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al.,

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 

Please substitute the appearance of Mary Elizabeth Smith for Elizabeth N. Duncan 

and Zachary A. Gray as counsel of record for the United States of America in the abovecaptioned case. Stephanie A. Sasarak will continue to represent the United States of 

America. Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all future notices, 

orders, filings, and other material relevant to this action should be directed and served 

upon undersigned counsel at the address shown below. 

Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2023 Page 1 of 3
2 

Dated: October 5, 2023 Respectfully Submitted

DAVID A. HUBBERT 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

/s/ Mary Elizabeth Smith 

MARY ELIZABETH SMITH

Maryland Bar No. 0712110235 

Trial Attorney, Tax Division 

U.S. Department of Justice 

717 N. Harwood Street, Suite 400 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

(214) 880-9779 (v) | (214) 880-9741 (f) 

Mary.E.Smith@usdoj.gov 

STEPHANIE A. SASARAK 

Maryland Bar No. 1012160096

Trial Attorney, Tax Division 

U.S. Department of Justice 

P.O. Box 14198 

Washington, D.C. 20044 

202-307-2089 (v) | 202-514-4963 (f)

Stephanie.A.Sasarak@usdoj.gov 

Counsel for the United States 

Of counsel: 

MARKENZY LAPOINTE 

United States Attorney 

Southern District of Florida

Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2023 Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on October 5, 2023, I filed a copy of the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to 

counsel of record. 

 /s/ Mary Elizabeth Smith

MARY ELIZABETH SMITH

Trial Attorney 

 U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Division 

Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2023 Page 3 of 3
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Cybernotes [electronicresource].**
 
2004: Feb23 | Mar15
 
SuDoc Number:J 1.14/23-2: | HS 1.21:
Item Number:0717-C-27 (online) | 0520-B-31(online)
CGP systemNumber:000521102
 
August 28, 2019
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-1818

___________________________

Harlan Hall Willet, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jason Smith; Brad Wittrock; Daniel Pingel

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants

Jerry Burch; Jayla Graybill

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellants

Sean Morris

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City

____________

 Submitted: December 11, 2015

Filed: January 7, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________
PER CURIAM.

Jerry Burch and Jayla Graybill--employees of the Civil Commitment Unit for

Sex Offenders (CCUSO) in Iowa--appeal the denial of summary judgment based on

qualified immunity in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action brought by CCUSO patient Harlan

Willet, Jr.. Upon careful de novo review of the record and consideration of the

parties’ briefs, we conclude that the admissible evidence before the district court could

not, as a matter of law, support a determination that Burch and Graybill violated

Willet’s clearly established Fourteenth Amendment right to substantive due process. 

See Jones v. McNeese, 746 F.3d 887, 899-900 (8th Cir.) (qualified immunity

standard), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 688 (2014). Accordingly, the order of the district

court denying Burch and Graybill summary judgment on their qualified immunity

defenses is reversed, and the case is remanded for entry of judgment in favor of Burch

and Graybill.

______________________________

-2-
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 October 17, 2014
Pat Smith, Assistant Library Director Monticello Library 80 North Main Street Monticello, UT 84535 Subject: Public documents atthe Monticello Library for public inspection Dear Ms. Smith: The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency sentyou apackage containing a number ofdocuments regarding the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation nearthe city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. Two ofthese documents contained an error, and need to be replaced. Please replace the following documents in the package previously sent toyou with the enclosed documents: 1. PUBLIC INFORMATION SHEET 2. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IMPACT REPORT & FACT SHEET Yourassistance with this matteris greatly appreciated. Feel free to contact me at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov ifyou have any questions.Sincerely,

Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer Permits Office Air Division
Enclosures
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 704

For the relief of Walter Borys.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Walter Borys.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM.

4 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATION.—The Secretary

5 of the Army shall consider the claim described in sub6 section (b) without regard to the time limitation estab7 lished by section 2734(b)(1) of title 10, United States

8 Code, or any predecessor time limitation applicable at the

9 time the claim accrued.

10 (b) CLAIM DESCRIBED.—The claim referred to in

11 subsection (a) is the claim filed against the United States

12 at Fort Hamilton, New York, on June 30, 1993, by Mr.
2

HR 704 IH

1 Walter Borys, of Lakeview Avenue, Yonkers, New York,

2 pertaining to the murder of his father, Mr. Eustach Borys,

3 on June 13, 1946, in Kempten, Germany.

Æ
#### CAROLINE E. PATRICK and another, Committee, etc., Respondents, *v.*THE EXCELSIOR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

*Policy of insurance—when not invalidated try suicide of insured.*

In an action upon a policy of insurance taken out upon the life of a husband for the benefit of his wife, the suicide of the insured is not a defense where there is no stipulation to that effect in the policy.

*Fitch*v. *American Popular Life Ins. Co.*(11 Alb. Law Jour., 91) followed.

The expression, in a policy of life insurance, “ in the known violation of the law of any State,” cannot be construed to include suicide.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made upon the judge’s minutes.

*Elliott F. Shepard,*for the appellant.

*Henry Smith*and *John R. Putnam,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-Fof NICE Systems Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Haim Shani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

June 29,2005

 

|   | By:                                              |   /s/ Haim Shani |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|   |   Haim Shani, Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
AmeriCorps NCCC Pacific Region at a Glance 

AmeriCorps NCCC is a national service program whose 

mission is to strengthen communities and develop leaders 

through direct, team-based national and community service. 

Within a full-time, residential setting, AmeriCorps NCCC 

members are assigned to a regional campus and placed onto 

teams of eight to 12 members. Over the course of their 

10-month service term, each team will complete a series of 

different projects in different places, with each project lasting 

three to 13 weeks. Members work on projects with 

sponsoring organizations to address local community needs 

in the areas of energy conservation, environmental 

stewardship, infrastructure improvement, natural and other 

disaster services, and urban and rural development. 

See what project sponsors in the Pacific Region are saying 

about AmeriCorps NCCC project teams: 

AmeriCorps NCCC Pacific Region 

Sponsors by the Numbers 

Among project sponsors that hosted an AmeriCorps 

NCCC Pacific Region team... 

92% were satisfied or very satisfied with the 

AmeriCorps NCCC team’s work. 

92% believed their organization accomplished its work 

faster because of their AmeriCorps NCCC team. 

85% believed to a large or moderate extent that the 

AmeriCorps NCCC team’s efforts strengthened the local 

community. 

82% believed their AmeriCorps NCCC team met the 

community’s primary need completely or to a large 

extent. 

For more information on these findings, see the NCCC Sponsor 

Survey report. 

About the Office of Research and Evaluation 

The AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation assists 

AmeriCorps and its partners in collecting, analyzing, and 

disseminating data and insights about AmeriCorps programs 

and civic life in America. 

About the Pacific Region 

The AmeriCorps NCCC Pacific Region includes 

Alaska, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, 

Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Pacific 

Territories. Its projects often involve disaster 

response and environmental conservation. Visit 

the AmeriCorps site for current Pacific Region 

projects. 

Questions? Email the regional campus at 

NCCCPacific@cns.gov. 

Interested in AmeriCorps NCCC? Visit the 

AmeriCorps site for more information on serving 

as a member or to have your organization 

become a project sponsor. 

“The guidance and support from NCCC Staff was 

superb. The team and its individual members 

were awesome to work with. So much energy, 

talent, and a keenness to learn.” 

─ AmeriCorps NCCC project sponsor ─

Produced and published at US taxpayer expense | 2023
#### § 102-85.100 How does a customer agency pay for tenant improvements?

To pay for the installation of tenant improvements, the customer agency may spend an amount not to exceed the tenant allowance. The amount spent by the customer agency for TIs is amortized over a period of time specified in the OA, not to exceed the useful life of the improvements. This amortization payment is in addition to the shell rent and services.
§ 102-75.845 What must DOT address in the assignment recommendation submitted to the disposal agency? Any assignment recommendation that DOT submits to the disposal agency must provide complete information concerning the contemplated port facility use, including— ( a ) An identification of the property;
( b ) An identification of the applicant;
( c ) A copy of the approved application, which defines the proposed plan of use of the property;
( d ) A statement that DOT's determination (that the property is located in an area of serious economic disruption) was made in consultation with the Secretary of Labor;
( e ) A statement that DOT approved the economic development plan, associated with the plan of use of the property, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce; and
( f ) A copy of the explanatory statement, required under 40 U.S.C. 554(c)(2)(C).
----

| 1.   | The      Corporation’s overall cash flow; |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      Corporation’s earnings (operating, net or  otherwise); |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | The      per share price of the CommonStock; |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The      operating performance of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries (including      safety and other issues concerning regulatory  compliance); |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | The      rate of return on investment and/orequity; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

| 6.   | Measures      of employee engagement and/ orsatisfaction; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

| 7.   | The      overall state of relations between the Corporation and the representatives      of organized labor groups; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 8.   | The      Corporation’s balance sheet; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------|

| 9.   | The      overall state of relations between the Corporation and its largest      shareholders; |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 10.   | The      Corporation’s revenues; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------|

| 11.   | Such      other factors as the Committee  may in its discretion deem      material. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 10-10903.

#### Zied *v.*Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.