alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company'sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report")fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

| Date:    November 11,****2003 | /s/ Geoffery E. Merszei |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                          |                    | Geoffery E. Merszei

                              Executive Vice President and 

Chief                              Financial Officer |
§ 105-71.105 Additions and exceptions. ( a ) For classes of grants and grantees subject to this part, Federal agencies may not impose additional administrative requirements except in codified regulations published in the Federal Register.
( b ) Exceptions for classes of grants or grantees may be authorized only by OMB.
( c ) Exceptions on a case-by-case basis and for subgrantees may be authorized by the affected Federal agencies.
§ 201-1.304 Executive agency compliance with exclusion and removal orders. ( a ) *Agency compliance.* Executive agencies shall: ( 1 ) Comply with exclusion and removal orders issued pursuant to § 201-1.303 and applicable to their agency, as required by 41 U.S.C. 1323(c)(7) and 44 U.S.C. 3554(a)(1)(B); and
( 2 ) Comply with handling and/or dissemination restrictions placed upon the order or its contents by the issuing official.
( b ) *Exceptions to issued exclusion and removal orders.* An executive agency required to comply with an exclusion or removal order may submit to the issuing official a request to be excepted from the order's provisions. The requesting agency: ( 1 ) May ask to be excepted from some or all of the order's requirements. The agency may ask, for example, that the order not apply to the agency, to specific actions of the agency, or to actions of the agency for a period of time before compliance with the order is practicable.
( 2 ) Shall submit the request in writing and include in it all necessary information for the issuing official to review and evaluate it, including— ( i ) Identification of the applicable exclusion order or removal order;
( ii ) A description of the exception sought, including, if limited to only a portion of the order, a description of the order provisions from which an exception is sought;
( iii ) The name or a description sufficient to identify the covered article or the product or service provided by a source that is subject to the order from which an exception is sought;
( iv ) Compelling justification for why an exception should be granted, such as the impact of the order on the agency's ability to fulfill its mission- critical functions, or considerations related to the national interest, including national security reviews, national security investigations, or national security agreements;
( v ) Any alternative mitigations to be undertaken to reduce the risks addressed by the exclusion or removal order; and
( vi ) Any other information requested by the issuing official.
§ 102-41.60 Are there special requirements in reporting seized or forfeited personal property to GSA? Yes, in addition to the information required in § 102-36.235 of this subchapter B for reporting excess, you must indicate— ( a ) Whether the property— ( 1 ) Was forfeited in a judicial proceeding or administratively (without going through a court);
( 2 ) Is subject to pending court proceedings for forfeiture, and, if so, the name of the defendant, the place and judicial district of the court from which the decree will be issued, and whether you wish to retain the property for official use;
( b ) The report or case number under which the property is listed; and
( c ) The existence or probability of a lien, or other accrued or accruing charges, and the amount involved.
Merrimack

No. 79-066

#### Donald R. Harrington v. State of New Hampshire Department of Employment Security

June 27, 1979

*Donald R. Harrington,*of Hooksett, by brief and orally, pro se.

*Edward F. Smith*and *Robert L. Hermann, Jr.,*of Concord *(Mr. Hermann*orally), for the defendants.

Memorandum Opinion

Plaintiff was denied unemployment compensation because his retirement income exceeded his weekly benefits thus leaving no benefits payable under RSA 282:2 E (Supp. 1977). Plaintiff appealed to the superior court in accordance with RSA 282:5 G, claiming that the provision providing for a reduction of benefits by the amount of retirement income, although stated in the statute as effective on July 1,1977, was in fact not effective until January 1,1978, or possibly until September 30, 1979. His claim was based upon the congressional act authorizing such reduction. 26 U.S.C. § 3304 (a) (15), *as amended*(Supp. 11977). The case was referred to a Master *(Robert A. Carignan,*Esq.). While the case was pending, the legislature amended RSA 282:2 E to comply with the federal statute and the court remanded the matter to the department of employment security, which awarded plaintiff reimbursement in the amount of $3,536 in accordance with the amended statute. RSA 282:2 E, *as amended,*Laws 1978, 50:1.

Plaintiff then sought further compensation in the superior court for attorney fees and inconvenience. After a hearing the master found an absence of bad faith, vexatious, wanton, or oppressive action by the *518defendant, and the court denied the claim. Plaintiffs exceptions were transferred by Batchelder, J.

The plaintiff presented his case ably and competently. However, the master’s findings are supported by the record. It was not unreasonable for the defendants to rely upon and follow the State statute until it was amended. The conditions of *Harkeem v. Adams,*117 N.H. 687, 377 A.2d 617 (1977), were not met.

*Exceptions overruled.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, April 3, 2000, 4 p.m. to April 3, 2000, 7 p.m., NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 3, 2000, 65 FR 17519.                

The meeting will be held on July 11, 2000, 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. The location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 14, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-15743  Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
CERTIFICATION

OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Teresa B. Dickey, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of NMXS.com, Inc.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended yearly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended yearly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended yearly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended yearly report;

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the a registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended yearly report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended yearly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

(c) presented in this amended yearly report my conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date

 

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

 

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.  I have indicated in this amended yearly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Dated: March 31, 2006

 

/s/ Teresa B. Dickey

Teresa B. Dickey

Principal Financial Officer
#### § 102-36.460 Do we report excess medical shelf-life items held for national emergency purposes?

When the remaining shelf life of any medical materials or supplies held for national emergency purposes is of too short a period to justify their continued retention, you should report such property excess for possible transfer and disposal. You must make such excess determinations at such time as to ensure that sufficient time remains to permit their use before their shelf-life expires and the items are unfit for human use. You must identify such items with “MSL” and the expiration date, and indicate any specialized storage requirements.
§ 102-36.330 Are there occasions when public notice is not needed regarding abandonment/destruction of excess personal property? Yes, you are not required to provide public notice when: ( a ) The value of the property is so little or the cost of its care and handling, pending abandonment/destruction, is so great that its retention for advertising for sale, even as scrap, is clearly not economical;
( b ) Abandonment or destruction is required because of health, safety, or security reasons; or
( c ) When the original acquisition cost of the item (estimated if unknown) is less than $500.
[65 FR 31218, May 16, 2000, as amended at 65 FR 34983, June 1, 2000]
#### § 102-75.120 Is there any other information that needs to accompany (or be submitted with) the Report of Excess Real Property (Standard Form 118)?

Yes, in all cases where Government-owned land is reported excess, Executive agencies must include a title report, prepared or approved by a qualified employee of the landholding agency, documenting the Government's title to the property.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet on July 20, 2000, at the Bureau of Land Management, 1717 Fabry Road SE, Salem, Oregon. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and end at  4 p.m. Agenda items to be covered include (1) Information sharing among PAC members; (2) BLM/OHV strategy; (3) Pacific Coast Initiative; (4) Willamette Restoration Initiative; and (5) Coast Range Association long rotation forestry. Two fifteen-minute open public forums are scheduled at 11:30 a.m. and 3:45 p.m. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. The committee welcomes the public's written comments on committee business at any time.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joni Quarnstrom, Public Affairs Specialist, Siuslaw National Forest, 541-750-7075, or write to the Forest Supervisor, Siuslaw National Forest, P.O. Box 1148, Corvallis, Oregon 97339.

Dated: June 12, 2000.

Gloria D. Brown,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 00-15803  Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 734

To prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from discounting loan deficiency

payments under the Agricultural Market Transition Act for club wheat

and to compensate club wheat producers who received discounted loan

deficiency payments as a result of the erroneous decision of the Department of Agriculture to assess a premium adjustment against club wheat.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1999

Mr. NETHERCUTT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from discounting

loan deficiency payments under the Agricultural Market

Transition Act for club wheat and to compensate club

wheat producers who received discounted loan deficiency

payments as a result of the erroneous decision of the

Department of Agriculture to assess a premium adjustment against club wheat.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 734 IH

1 SECTION 1. EQUALIZATION OF LOAN DEFICIENCY PAY2 MENTS FOR CLUB WHEAT PRODUCERS.

3 (a) PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT PROHIBITED.—In mak4 ing loan deficiency payments available under section 135

5 of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7235)

6 to producers of club wheat, the Secretary of Agriculture

7 may not assess a premium adjustment on the amount that

8 would otherwise be computed for club wheat under the sec9 tion to reflect the premium that is paid for club wheat

10 to ensure its availability to create a blended specialty prod11 uct known as western white wheat.

12 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—

13 (1) COMPENSATION REQUIRED.—As soon as

14 practicable after the date of the enactment of this

15 Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall make a pay16 ment to each producer of club wheat that received

17 a discounted loan deficiency payment under section

18 135 of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7

19 U.S.C. 7235) before that date as a result of the as20 sessment of a premium adjustment against club

21 wheat. The amount of the payment for a producer

22 shall be equal to the difference between—

23 (A) the loan deficiency payment that would

24 have been made to the producer in the absence

25 of the premium adjustment; and
3

•HR 734 IH

1 (B) the loan deficiency payment actually

2 received by the producer.

3 (2) FUNDING SOURCE.—The Secretary shall

4 use funds available to provide marketing assistance

5 loans and loan deficiency payments under subtitle C

6 of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C.

7 7231 et seq.) to make the payments required by this

8 subsection.

Æ
**ORDER PA**  **GE 1**  IN THE SUPREME COUR T OF THE ST

AT E OF MONT

ANA No. DA 22 - 0541 ST AT E OF MONT

ANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BEAU AV IDIY

A, Defendant and Appellant.
**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant ’ s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 22 nd , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant ’ s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 14 2024

03/14/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0541
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 3.2A


                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                      OF

                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                      OF

                       THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

                -----------------------------------------------
                    Pursuant to Section 242 of the General
                   Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
                -----------------------------------------------

        The Ashton Technology Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"),
hereby certifies as follows:

        1.  The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed in the
office of the Secretary of State of Delaware on February 16, 1994 and amendments
to the Certificate of Incorporation were subsequently duly filed and recorded
(the Certificate of Incorporation together with such amendments shall be
hereinafter referred to as the "Certificate of Incorporation").

        2.  The first paragraph of ARTICLE FOURTH of the Certificate of
Incorporation is hereby amended to read in full as follows:

            FOURTH:  The total number of all classes of stock which the
    Corporation shall have authority to issue shall be 103,000,000, of which
    100,000,000 shares shall be common stock, having a par value of $0.01 per
    share, and of which 3,000,000 shares shall be preferred stock, having a par
    value of $0.01 per share.

        3.  The aforesaid amendments were duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.
<PAGE>

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused its corporate seal to be
affixed hereto and this certificate to be signed by its Chief Executive Officer
and attested by its Secretary this thirteenth day of October, 2000.

                                        THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.


                                        By:  /s/ Fredric W. Rittereiser
                                           ------------------------------------
                                                  Fredric W. Rittereiser
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


[Corporate Seal]

Attest:

By:  /s/ Mark I. Salvacion
   -----------------------------
        Mark I. Salvacion
            Secretary

                                      -2-
P. 1



# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 41 ) IV-C- 7 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:53 AM Sheet 41 of 232. —— — EL2

_ f%\ \ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y ^|^ Z* AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5

OC T2 2 198

7 AI R AN D RADIATIO N
Mr . RalphHitchcock , Directo r Offic e o f Vehicl e Safet y Standard s Nationa l Highway

Traffi c Safety Administratio n(NRM-10 ) 40 0 7thStreet , S

W Washington , DC 2059 0 Dear Mr . Hitchcock : A s requeste d i nyou r lette r o f Septembe r 28 , 1987 , I am sendin g yo u a cop yo f th e Notic e o f Propose d Rulemakin g and th e Regulatory

Impac t Analysi s o n in-us e gasolin e volatilit y control . I regre t tha t yo u di d no t receiv e th e volatilit y document s whic hwer e sen t a t th e sam e tim e a s th e onboar d document s we provide dpreviously . I apologiz e for any inconvenienc e cause d byno t havin g thi s materia l fo r you r review . i f yo u hav e an yquestion s o r nee d anyfurthe r informatio no nthi s proposa l pleas e contac t me . Furthermore , I note d you r concer nwit hth e possibl e safet y implication s o f vehicle s travelin g lon g distance s and/o r bein g operate d fo r lengthyperiod s withou t refueling . I f you r concern s ar e abou t th e capacit yo f a nonboar d caniste r operatin g unde r thes e conditions , th e onboar d syste moperate s i nsuc ha manne r tha t th e caniste r i s almos t entirel ypurge d shortl yafte r th e refuelin g event . A s a result , th e caniste r wil l hav e extr a capacit yavailabl e a t mos t time s t o handl e any exces s evaporativ e emission s whic hmayoccur . Moreover , i f you r concer ninvolve s th e effect s o f hig hambien t temperatur e and RV P o nfue l tan k emissions , i t i s importan t t o not e tha t th e fue l wil l b e consume d a s th e vehicl e i s driven . Whe n th e vehicl e travel s lon g distance s (i.e. , betwee nregions) , i t wil l eventuall yhav e t o b e refueled . Th e fue l use d i nth e late r refuelin g even t wil l b e a t RV P level s compatibl e t o th e ambien t temperature s o f thi s ne wregion . Therefore , n o advers e safet y implication s shoul d result . I hop e thi s addresse s you r safet y concerns , bu t pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t u s a t anytim e t o furthe r discus s thes e o r an yothe r concern s yo u hav e regardin g ou r proposals . Sincerel yyours ,

»... . • - - - - / '/• • Charle s L . Gray , Jr . ' Directo r Emissio ncontro l Technolog yDivisio n Enclosure s