alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  ALBERTSON'S
QUARTERLY  REPORT TO  STOCKHOLDERS  FOR THE 26 WEEKS ENDED JULY 29, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  FEB-03-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUL-29-1999
<CASH>                                                  35,848
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          551,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                            21,879
<INVENTORY>                                          3,113,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     4,551,428
<PP&E>                                              13,454,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                       4,655,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      15,122,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,719,435
<BONDS>                                              5,039,253
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                               423,466
<OTHER-SE>                                           5,036,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        15,122,435
<SALES>                                             18,596,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    18,596,628
<CGS>                                               13,538,614
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       13,538,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     159,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        243,574
<INCOME-TAX>                                           209,926
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     33,648
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         23,272
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                            10,376
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.02


</TABLE>
§ 105-60.300 Responsibility for responding to FOIA requests. ( a ) The GSA FOIA Requester Service Center is responsible for managing all requests for records submitted to GSA from initial receipt of the FOIA request through the agency's final decision to release in whole or in part, or withhold the requested records.
( b ) Upon receiving a request for records, the GSA FOIA Requester Service Center shall determine whether the requested records reside within GSA. If GSA does not have ownership of the requested records, the GSA FOIA Requester Service Center shall make a good faith effort to redirect the requester to the appropriate record location or/entity that has control and ownership of the requested record, if known.
( c ) If GSA has possession of the requested records, the FOIA Requester Service Center shall work in coordination with the appropriate GSA component/or program office to fulfill the FOIA request in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552.
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 

NOTE 
 November 5, 2019

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. or registered
assigns (the “Lender”), in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement (as hereinafter defined), the principal amount of each Loan from time to time made by the Lender to the Borrower under that certain Fourth Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 5, 2019 (as amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from time to time, the “Agreement;” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein
defined), among the Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent. 

The Borrower promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Loan from the date of such Loan until such principal amount is
paid in full, at such interest rates and at such times as provided in the Agreement. All payments of principal and interest shall be made to the Administrative Agent for the account of the Lender in Dollars in immediately available funds at the
Administrative Agent’s Office. If any amount is not paid in full when due hereunder, such unpaid amount shall bear interest, to be paid upon demand, from the due date thereof until the date of actual payment (and before as well as after
judgment) computed at the per annum rate set forth in the Agreement. 
 This Note is one of the Notes referred to in the Agreement, is
entitled to the benefits thereof and may be prepaid in whole or in part subject to the terms and conditions provided therein. Upon the occurrence and continuation of one or more of the Events of Default specified in the Agreement, all amounts then
remaining unpaid on this Note shall become, or may be declared to be, immediately due and payable all as provided in the Agreement. Loans made by the Lender shall be evidenced by one or more loan accounts or records maintained by the Lender in the
ordinary course of business. The Lender may also attach schedules to this Note and endorse thereon the date, amount and maturity of its Loans and payments with respect thereto. 

The Borrower, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby waives diligence, presentment, protest and demand and notice of protest, demand,
dishonor and non-payment of this Note except to the extent as may otherwise be expressly set forth in the Agreement. 

Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Note by fax transmission or other electronic mail transmission (e.g.
“pdf” or “tif”) shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Note. 
 [SIGNATURE PAGE
FOLLOWS] 












 THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH
OF VIRGINIA. 
  

			
	 TREX COMPANY, INC.,
 a Delaware
corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Bryan H. Fairbanks

	Name:	 	Bryan H. Fairbanks
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President and
		 	Chief Financial Officer


 TREX COMPANY, INC. 

NOTE
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 84-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2023   Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Sento Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick F. O’ Neal,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Patrick F. O’ Neal |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |
| Patrick  F. O’ Neal     |
| Chief  Executive Officer     |
| February  9, 2004            |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15478]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL00-83-000]

NSTAR Services Company, Complainant v. New England Power Pool 
Respondent; Notice of Filing

June 14, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 13, 2000, NSTAR Services Company (NSTAR), 
tendered for filing a Complaint Requesting Fast Track Processing and 
Prayer for Emergency Relief.
    NSTAR petitions the Commission for an order directing the New 
England Power Pool (NEPOOL) to amend its agreements and market rules to 
provide for a temporary $1,000/MWh bid cap in the energy and ancillary 
services markets operated by the Independent System Operator, New 
England, Inc., (ISO-NE). NSTAR further requests that the Commission 
direct NEPOOL to conduct studies analyzing the operation of the 
restructured market, and implement a structural screen that will 
mitigate market power. They request that both of these measures be 
implemented by April 1, 2001.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
and protests should be filed on or before June 23, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or 
before June 23, 2000.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15478 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
§ 105-68.830 Under what conditions do I get an additional opportunity to challenge the facts on which a proposed debarment is based? ( a ) You as a respondent will not have an additional opportunity to challenge the facts if the debarring official determines that— ( 1 ) Your debarment is based upon a conviction or civil judgment;
( 2 ) Your presentation in opposition contains only general denials to information contained in the Notice of Proposed Debarment; or
( 3 ) The issues raised in your presentation in opposition to the proposed debarment are not factual in nature, or are not material to the debarring official's decision whether to debar.
( b ) You will have an additional opportunity to challenge the facts if the debarring official determines that— ( 1 ) The conditions in paragraph (a) of this section do not exist; and
( 2 ) Your presentation in opposition raises a genuine dispute over facts material to the proposed debarment.
( c ) If you have an opportunity to challenge disputed material facts under this section, the debarring official or designee must conduct additional proceedings to resolve those facts.
#### § 102-41.15 How do we request a deviation from these requirements and who can approve it?

See §§ 102-2.60 through 102-2.110 of this chapter to request a deviation from the requirements of this part.
#### § 102-36.405 May we keep gifts given to us from the public?

If your agency has gift retention authority, you may retain gifts from the public. Otherwise, you must report gifts you receive on a SF 120 to GSA. You must report gifts received from a foreign government in accordance with part 102-42 of this chapter.

[65 FR 31218, May 16, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 53572, Sept. 12, 2006]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

Tuesday, June 13, 2000, 1 pm (Open Portion); 1:30 pm (Closed Portion). 

# PLACE:

 Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC

# STATUS:

Meeting open to the Public from 1 pm to 1:30 pm. Closed portion will commence at 1:30 pm (approx.) 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

1. President's Report

2. Appointment—Joan Logue-Kinder

3. Approval of March 21, 2000 Minutes (Open Portion)

# FURTHER MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

(Closed to the Public 1:30 pm).

1. Finance Project in Southeast Europe

2. Insurance Project in Bulgaria

3. Finance and Insurance Project in Equatorial Guinea

4. Finance Project in Turkey

5. Approval of March 21, 2000 Minutes (Closed Portion)

6. Pending Major Projects

8. Reports

# CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:

Information on the meeting may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438.

Dated: June 12, 2000.

Connie M. Downs,

OPIC Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-15249  Filed 6-13-00; 10:26 am]

BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-62333-CV-WILLIAMS

MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

PLYMOUTH PLAZA, LLC, 

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Panayotta AugustinBirch’s Report and Recommendation (DE 69) (“Report”) on Defendant’s Motion to 

Dismiss (DE 42) (“Motion”). In the Report, Magistrate Judge Augustin-Birch 

recommends that the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s Motion (DE 42). 

Specifically, the Report finds whether Plaintiff’s claims are analyzed under Florida or New 

York law, Plaintiff cannot recoup its settlement payment or defense costs incurred in the 

ultimate resolution of the Florida state court proceeding between Defendant and Mitchel 

Klock’s estate. (DE 69 at 9–22.) The Report recommends that the Court not dismiss 

Count I but dismiss Counts II, III, IV, and V of Plaintiff’s Corrected Second Amended 

Complaint (DE 38). (DE 69 at 22.) Plaintiff filed Objections to the Report (DE 75), to 

which Defendant filed a Response (DE 79).1 Defendant filed Objections to the Report 

1 The Court notes that Plaintiff’s objections merely rehash arguments, in some instances 

verbatim, that were presented to Judge Augustin-Birch. As such, the objection simply 

disagrees with the Report’s conclusion. However, it is well settled that an objecting party 

may not “submit [] papers to a district court which are nothing more than a rehashing of 

the same arguments and positions taken in the original papers submitted to the 

Magistrate Judge. Clearly, parties are not to be afforded a ‘second bite at the apple’ when 

Case 0:22-cv-62333-KMW Document 103 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/22/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

(DE 76), to which Plaintiff filed a Response (DE 80). The Court conducted a de novo 

review of the portions of the Report to which Plaintiff and Defendant objected and a review 

of the remainder of the Report for clear error. 

Having carefully reviewed the Report, the Objections, the record, and applicable 

law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. The Report (DE 69) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (DE 42) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED 

IN PART. 

3. Count II, Count III, Count IV, and Count V of Plaintiff’s Corrected Second 

Amended Complaint (DE 38) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 21st day of November,

2023.

they file objections to a [Report].” Marlite, Inc. v. Eckenrod, 2012 WL 3614212, at *2 (S.D. 

Fla. Aug. 21, 2012) (quoting Camardo v. Gen. Motors Hourly-Rate Emps. Pension Plan, 

806 F. Supp. 380, 382 (W.D.N.Y. 1992)).

Case 0:22-cv-62333-KMW Document 103 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/22/2023 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allis-Chalmers Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Victor M. Perez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Victor M. Perez
         ---------------------------
         Victor M. Perez
         Principal Financial Officer


Date:    August 16, 2005


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 102-75.210 What must a transferee agency include in its request for an exception from the 100 percent reimbursement requirement?

The request must include an explanation of how granting the exception would further essential agency program objectives and at the same time be consistent with Executive Order 12512, Federal Real Property Management, dated April 29, 1985. The transferee agency must attach the explanation to the Request for Transfer of Excess Real and Related Personal Property (GSA Form 1334) prior to submitting the form to GSA. The unavailability of funds alone is not sufficient to justify an exception.
#### § 102-75.415 What happens after the disposal agency receives the FAA's recommendation for disposal of the property for a public airport?

The head of the disposal agency, or his or her designee, may convey property approved by the FAA for use as a public airport to the eligible public agency, subject to the provisions of the Surplus Property Act of 1944, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO HAC VICE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Marvin s. Putnam of the law firm Latham & Watkins LLP

appears as counsel for Defendant Lawrence Gene David, and requests that all papers served in this 

case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Per Rule 4(b)(4) of the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and 

Discipline of Attorneys for the Southern District of Florida, Mr. Putnam was previously admitted 

to appear pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendants Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen

and states that all information provided in support of his initial pro hac vice motion remains current 

and correct, including the sponsoring co-counsel.

Dated: April 6, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Roberto Martínez

Roberto Martínez

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Florida Bar No. 305596 

Email: bob@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Lawrence Gene David

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-85292 and 333-90846) of ITS Networks, Inc.
of  our  report  dated December 14, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial
statements  of  ITS  Networks Inc., which report is incorporated by reference in
this  annual  report  on  Form  10-KSB.


January  14,  2003                         Moore  Stephens,  P.C.

                                           /s/Moore Stephens
#### § 105-54.000 Scope of part.

This part sets forth policies and procedures in GSA regarding the establishment, operation, termination, and control of advisory committees for which GSA has responsibility. It implements the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), which authorizes a system governing the establishment and operation of advisory committees in the executive branch of the Federal Government, and Executive Order 11686 of October 7, 1972, which directs the heads of all executive departments and agencies to take appropriate action to ensure their ability to comply with the provisions of the Act.