alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ERIC & CO TRADING GROUP LLC, CASE NO.: 23-CV-20045-RKA

Judgment Creditor,

v. 

FLOYD MAYWEATHER, JR.,

Judgment Debtor.

and 

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and 

ENHANCE HEALTH LLC, 

Garnishees.

___________________________________/

WRIT OF GARNISHMENT

THE STATE OF FLORIDA:

To Each Sheriff of the State:

YOU ARE COMMANDED to summon the garnishee, ENHANCE HEALTH LLC, c/o 

Corporate Service Company, Registered Agent 1201 Hays Street, Tallahassee, Florida 

32301, to serve an answer to this writ on Judgment Creditor’s attorney, whose address is Zachary 

P. Hyman, Esq., Millennial Law, 501 E. Las Olas Blvd, Suite 200/314, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 

33301 within 20 days after service on the garnishee, exclusive of the day of service, and to file the 

original with the clerk of this court either before service on the attorney or immediately thereafter, 

stating whether the garnishee is indebted to Judgment Debtor, ERIC & CO TRADING GROUP 

LLC, at the time of the answer or was indebted at the time of service of the writ, or at any time 

between such times, and in what sum and what tangible and intangible personal property of the 

Judgment Debtor the Garnishee is in possession or control of at the time of the answer or had at 

Case 1:23-cv-20045-RKA Document 17-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2023 Page 1 of 2
the time of service of this writ, or at any time between such times, and whether the garnishee knows 

of any other person indebted to the defendant or who may be in possession or control of any of the 

property of the Judgment Debtor. The amount set in plaintiff’s motion is the sum of $1,168,650.00, 

plus prejudgment interest of $111,551.32 and post-judgment interest, attorneys’ fees and costs in 

the amount of $8,576 remains due and unpaid on the Judgment.

DATED: 

ANGELA E. NOBLE

CLERK OF COURT

By: _________________________________

 As Deputy Clerk

Copies furnished to: 

Zachary P Hyman, Esq.

zach@millenniallaw.com

jessica@millenniallaw.com

assistant@millenniallaw.com

millenniallawforms@gmail.com

Floyd Mayweather, Jr.

288 South Coconut Lane

Miami Beach, Florida 33139

Case 1:23-cv-20045-RKA Document 17-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 102-75.1210 What action must be taken on properties determined unsuitable for homeless assistance?

The landholding agency will defer, for 20 days after the date that notice of a property is published in the Federal Register, action to dispose of properties determined unsuitable for homeless assistance. HUD will inform landholding agencies or GSA, if a representative of the homeless files an appeal of unsuitability pursuant to § 102-75.1175(f)(4). HUD will advise the agency that it should refrain from initiating disposal procedures until HUD has completed its reconsideration process regarding unsuitability. Thereafter, or if no appeal has been filed after 20 days, GSA or the appropriate landholding agency may proceed with disposal action in accordance with applicable law.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00639-CR

NO. 03-06-00640-CR

David Gearing Krause, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. 2010351 & 2010352, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s motions to dismiss these appeals are granted. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). The appeals are dismissed.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: November 22, 2006

Do Not Publish
§ 102-37.260 How must a SASP document the distribution of surplus property? All SASPs must document the distribution of Federal surplus property on forms that are prenumbered, provide for donees to indicate the primary purposes for which they are acquiring property, and include the: ( a ) Certifications and agreements in §§ 102-37.200 and 102-37.205; and
( b ) Period of restriction during which the donee must use the property for the purpose for which it was acquired.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00321-CR

SAUL MARQUEZ GARZA

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-CR-7954-DC

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 24, 2021
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExponential order statistic models of software reliability growthFailure times of a software reliabilty growth process are modeled as order statistics of independent, nonidentically distributed exponential random variables. The Jelinsky-Moranda, Goel-Okumoto, Littlewood, Musa-Okumoto Logarithmic, and Power Law models are all special cases of Exponential Order Statistic Models, but there are many additional examples also. Various characterizations, properties and examples of this class of models are developed and presented.Document ID19850023539Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMiller, D. R.*(George Washington Univ. Washington, DC, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1985Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberT-496/84NAS 1.26:3909NASA-CR-3909Accession Number85N31852Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-34-13CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-179Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850023539.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 102-83.20 How does an agency request a deviation from the provisions of this part?

Refer to §§ 102-2.60 through 102-2.110 of this chapter for information on how to obtain a deviation from this part.
§ 3041.605 Competitive negotiated service agreement reporting requirements. ( a ) The Postal Service must file, on a quarterly basis, a summary spreadsheet listing all negotiated service agreements active during any part of the prior quarter. Negotiated service agreements must be listed by Mail Classification Schedule section or in such other way as the Commission requires by order. Such spreadsheet must identify all extensions, expirations, and terminations of negotiated service agreements and any other information the Commission requires by order.
( b ) A report is due within 14 days after the last day of each quarter of the fiscal year.
( c ) Upon finding that any report contains significant omissions, inaccuracies, or other deficiencies, the Commission may take any of the following actions: ( 1 ) Require the Postal Service to file such reports on a more frequent basis;
( 2 ) Require a Postal Service executive to submit a sworn statement attesting to the accuracy and completeness of each subsequent report; and
( 3 ) Impose other conditions the Commission finds reasonable and appropriate to ensure the accuracy and completeness of such reports.
#### § 105-1.101 General Services Administration Property Management Regulations.

The General Services Administration Property Management Regulations (GSPMR) include the GSA property management policies and procedures which, together with the Federal Property Management Regulations, certain regulations prescribed by other agencies, and various GSA orders govern the management of property and records and certain related activities of GSA. They may contain policies and procedures of interest to other agencies and the general public and are prescribed by the Administrator of General Services in this chapter 105.
To: Deborah Jeffrey 

Inspector General

From: Lori Giblin 

Chief Risk Officer 

Subject: High-Dollar Overpayments for the quarter ending March 31, 2016 

Date: July 7, 2016 

The purpose of this document is to comply with the High-Dollar overpayments' reporting 

requirements in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123, Appendix C. 

Appendix C requires agency heads to submit reports quarterly on High-Dollar 

overpayments to the Office of Inspector General. 

The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) identifies high-dollar 

overpayments through improper payments testing, which has not yet begun for FY2016. 

Therefore, during the reporting period covering 1/01/2016 through 03/31/2016, CNCS 

has not identified any high-dollar overpayments. 

This report upholds the Corporation’s commitment to carrying out the Executive Order’s 

goals of eliminating payment errors. Reducing improper payments remains vital for the 

Corporation. We continue to monitor programs in order to reduce the amount of 

overpayments.

250 E Street, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20525 

202-606-5000 | 800-942-2677 | TTY 800-833-3722
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC D/B/A 

KIKI ON THE RIVER AND ROMAN 

JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Andreas Bouras) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Andreas Bouras.

Dated this 24th day of February 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 85 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23.3



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8  No.  333-1912)  pertaining  to  the  1994  Stock  Option  Plan  of  TresCom
International,  Inc. of our report  dated  January 12, 1995 with  respect to the
consolidated  statements  of income and cash flows of Total  Telecommunications,
Inc. in the Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) of TresCom  International,  Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 28, 1997
Corporation for National and Community Service
Board of Directors

Resolution

WHEREAS, the Board is committed to ensuring that the Corporation for
National and Community Service (CNCS) is accountable for the funds appropriated to it
by Congress and to ensuring effective oversight and monitoring of CNCS programs to
eliminate waste, fraud and abuse; and

WHEREAS, the CNCS Office of Inspector General (OIG) is a key component of
the oversight and monitoring mechanism at CNCS; and

WHEREAS, CNCS relies on the funds appropriated to it by Congress for
Salaries and Expenses to conduct its own comprehensive monitoring and oversight; and

WHEREAS, the Board wishes to express concern about the potential impact on
monitoring and oversight of the cuts enacted with the passage of the FY 2012
Appropriations law to the budget of the OIG and to the Salaries and Expenses line of the
CNCS budget; and

WHEREAS, the Board has been in consultation with the senior management of
CNCS about ways to mitigate the impact of these cuts on CNCS’s ability to oversee and
to monitor the compliance of CNCS grantees and subgrantees with all applicable laws
and regulations since the enactment of these cuts; and

WHEREAS, CNCS senior management shares the Board’s articulated
commitment and concern; and

WHEREAS, CNCS has worked diligently to revise and expand its FY 2012 plan
to monitor its grantees and subgrantees and has conveyed the details of this plan to the
Board;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby directs

the Chief Executive Officer to continue to implement the plan referenced herein, and to
apprise the Board regularly of the progress of the implementation.

Approved by voice vote, February 8, 2012

Resolution 2012-04
§ 102-37.315 What costs may a SASP recover if undistributed surplus property is retransferred or sold? ( a ) When undistributed surplus property is transferred to a Federal agency or another SASP, or disposed of by public sale, you are entitled to recoup: ( 1 ) Direct costs you initially paid to the Federal holding agency, including but not limited to, packing, preparation for shipment, and loading. You will not be reimbursed for actions following receipt of the property, including unloading, moving, repairing, preserving, or storage.
( 2 ) Transportation costs you incurred, but were not reimbursed by a donee, for initially moving the property from the Federal holding agency to your distribution facility or other point of receipt. You must document and certify the amount of reimbursement requested for these costs.
( b ) Reimbursable arrangements should be made prior to transfer of the property. In the case of a Federal transfer, GSA will secure agreement of the Federal agency to reimburse your authorized costs, and annotate the amount of reimbursement on the transfer document. You must coordinate and make arrangements for reimbursement when property is transferred to another SASP. If you and the receiving SASP cannot agree on an appropriate reimbursement charge, GSA will determine appropriate reimbursement. The receiving SASP must annotate the reimbursement amount on the transfer document prior to its being forwarded to GSA for approval.
( c ) When undistributed property is disposed of by public sale, GSA must approve the amount of sales proceeds you may receive to cover your costs. Generally, this will not exceed 50 percent of the total sales proceeds.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38270-38271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-254-002]


Dauphin Island Gathering Partners; Notice of Proposed Changes In 
FERC Gas Tariff

June 14, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 8, 2000, Dauphin Island Gathering Partners 
(DIGP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume

[[Page 38271]]

No. 1, the tariff sheets listed below to become effective January 1, 
2000.

Second Revised Sheet No. 6
Second Revised Sheet No. 8
Second Revised Sheet No. 178
Second Revised Sheet No. 179

    DIGP states that these tariff sheets correct an error in the 
effective date shown in DIGP's April 24, 2000 filing pursuant to the 
Commission's Letter Order issued May 24, 2000 in Docket No. RP00-254.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are of file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15479 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 102-76.55 What sustainable development principles must Federal agencies apply to the siting, design, and construction of new facilities? In keeping with the objectives of Executive Order 13123, “Greening of the Government Through Efficient Energy Management,” and Executive Order 13101, “Greening of the Government Through Waste Prevention, Recycling, and Federal Acquisition,” Federal agencies must apply sustainable development principles to the siting, design, and construction of new facilities, which include— ( a ) Optimizing site potential;
( b ) Minimizing non-renewable energy consumption;
( c ) Using environmentally preferable products;
( d ) Protecting and conserving water;
( e ) Enhancing indoor environmental quality; and
( f ) Optimizing operational and maintenance practices.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al., 

Defendants.

/ 

CERTIFICATION OF SARAH P. HOGARTH

Sarah P. Hogarth, Esquire, pursuant to Rule 4(b)(1) of the Rules Governing the Admission, 

Practice, Peer Review, and Discipline of Attorneys, hereby certifies that: (1) I have studied the 

Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; (2) I am a 

member in good standing of the Bars of the State of Indiana, the District of Columbia, and the 

State of Maryland and admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States; the 

courts of Indiana, District of Columbia, and Maryland; the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, 

Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, D.C., and Federal Circuits; the U.S. 

District Courts for the Northern District of Indiana, Southern District of Indiana, District of 

Maryland, and District of Columbia; the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans’ Claims; and the 

Board of Immigration Appeals and Immigration Court; and (3) I have not filed more than three 

pro hac vice motions in different cases in this District within the last 365 days. 

/s/ Sarah P. Hogarth 

SARAH P. HOGARTH

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 134-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2023 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
      23.1








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








The
      Board
      of Directors


Hines
      Horticulture, Inc.:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
      333-58561) on Form S-8 of Hines Horticulture, Inc. of our report dated June
      28,
      2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Hines Horticulture,
      Inc.
      as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
      shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report
      appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Hines
      Horticulture, Inc.




Our
      report on the consolidated financial statements refers to Hines Horticulture,
      Inc.’s restatement of its consolidated financial statements for 2005 and
      2004.




/s/
      KPMG
      LLP




Costa
      Mesa, California


July
      10,
      2007
**EXHIBIT24.5****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mark A.Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full powerof substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical PartnersInternational, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposesas he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of saidattorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.                                                            /s/ D. Scott Mackesy   D. Scott Mackesy
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALLEN
TELECOM'S SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          21,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,771)
<INVENTORY>                                    101,484
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               225,479
<PP&E>                                         103,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                (63,457)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 473,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,880
<BONDS>                                        140,284
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,036
<OTHER-SE>                                     209,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   473,810
<SALES>                                        283,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               283,161
<CGS>                                        (198,265)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (198,265)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (64,813)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (303)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (7,995)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,088
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,991)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,097
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,300
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,397
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .30<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The Earnings per Share amounts have been calculated in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings
per Share". The above captions for primary and fully diluted include the basic
and diluted EPS amounts, respectively.
</FN>


</TABLE>