alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 105-72.601 Monitoring and reporting program performance. ( a ) Recipients are responsible for managing and monitoring each project, program, subaward, function or activity supported by the award. Recipients shall monitor subawards to ensure subrecipients have met the audit requirements as delineated in § 105-72.306.
( b ) The Federal awarding agency shall prescribe the frequency with which the performance reports shall be submitted. Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, performance reports shall not be required more frequently than quarterly or, less frequently than annually. Annual reports shall be due 90 calendar days after the grant year; quarterly or semiannual reports shall be due 30 days after the reporting period. The Federal awarding agency may require annual reports before the anniversary dates of multiple year awards in lieu of these requirements. The final performance reports are due 90 calendar days after the expiration or termination of the award.
( c ) If inappropriate, a final technical or performance report shall not be required after completion of the project.
( d ) When required, performance reports shall generally contain, for each award, brief information on each of the following. ( 1 ) A comparison of actual accomplishments with the goals and objectives established for the period, the findings of the investigator, or both. Whenever appropriate and the output of programs or projects can be readily quantified, such quantitative data should be related to cost data for computation of unit costs.
( 2 ) Reasons why established goals were not met, if appropriate.
( 3 ) Other pertinent information including, when appropriate, analysis and explanation of cost overruns or high unit costs.
( e ) Recipients shall not be required to submit more than the original and two copies of performance reports.
( f ) Recipients shall immediately notify the Federal awarding agency of developments that have a significant impact on the award-supported activities. Also, notification shall be given in the case of problems, delays, or adverse conditions which materially impair the ability to meet the objectives of the award. This notification shall include a statement of the action taken or contemplated, and any assistance needed to resolve the situation.
( g ) Federal awarding agencies may make site visits, as needed.
( h ) Federal awarding agencies shall comply with clearance requirements of 5 CFR part 1320 when requesting performance data from recipients.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 725 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 725

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 
                   penalty in the standard deduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1999

Mr. Kleczka (for himself, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Neal 
of Massachusetts, and Mr. Matsui) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 
                   penalty in the standard deduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY IN STANDARD DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 63(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to standard deduction) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$5,000'' in subparagraph (A) and 
        inserting ``twice the dollar amount in effect under 
        subparagraph (C) for the taxable year'',
            (2) by adding ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (B),
            (3) by striking ``in the case of'' and all that follows in 
        subparagraph (C) and inserting ``in any other case.'', and
            (4) by striking subparagraph (D).
    (b) Technical Amendments.--
            (1) Subparagraph (B) of section 1(f)(6) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``(other than with'' and all that follows 
        through ``shall be applied'' and inserting ``(other than with 
        respect to sections 63(c)(4) and 151(d)(4)(A)) shall be 
        applied''.
            (2) Paragraph (4) of section 63(c) of such Code is amended 
        by adding at the end the following flush sentence:
        ``The preceding sentence shall not apply to the amount referred 
        to in paragraph (2)(A).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5143 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5143

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 3160 Irvin Cobb Drive, in Paducah, Kentucky, as the ``Morgan 
                               Station''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3160 
Irvin Cobb Drive, in Paducah, Kentucky, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Morgan Station''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Morgan Station''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 24, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5143

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 3160 Irvin Cobb Drive, in Paducah, Kentucky, as the ``Morgan 
                               Station''.
```
§ 201-1.100 Scope. ( a ) *Applicability.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part applies to the following: ( 1 ) The membership and operations of the FASC, including all Federal Government and contractor personnel supporting the FASC's operations;
( 2 ) Submission and dissemination of supply chain risk information; and
( 3 ) Recommendations for, issuance of, and associated procedures related to removal orders and exclusion orders.
( b ) *Clarification of scope.* This part does not require the following: ( 1 ) Mandatory submission of supply chain risk information by non-Federal entities; or
( 2 ) The removal or exclusion of any covered article by non-Federal entities, except to the extent that an exclusion or removal order issued pursuant to subpart C of this part applies to prime contractors and subcontractors to Federal agencies.
#### § 300-70.102 When must we report on the use of first class and business class transportation accommodations?

You must report to the U.S. General Services Administration, Office of Government-wide Policy no later than December 31 of each year. The reporting period is October 1 through September 30. Negative submissions, *i.e.,* no data to report, are required for Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act agencies and agencies that reported the use of first class or business class transportation accommodations for the previous reporting cycle. All other agencies may provide a negative report, as relevant.

[FTR Case 2020-300-1, 87 FR 55702, Sept. 12, 2022]
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANADA20-0611TERRYWALLACE,PlaintiffandAppellant,v.LAWOFFICEOFBRUCESPENCER,PLLC,LPH,INC,aMontanaCorporation,GEISZLERSTEELE,PC,andJohnDoes1-5,DefendantsandAppellees.FILEDJAN122021BowenGreenwoodClerkofSupremeCourt:StateofMontanaORDERAppellantTerryWallacehasfiledanAppellant'sM.R.App.P.7(4)(g)Affidavitstatingthatheisunabletoaffordappellatemediation.ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatthismattershallproceedwithoutmediation.TheClerkisdirectedtoprovidecopiesofthisOrdertoTerryWallaceandtoallcounselofrecord.DATEDthis1Z._dayofJanuary,2021.FortheCourt,hiefJustice01/12/2021Case Number: DA 20-0611
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 71 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 71

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the exclusion 
               from gross income for veterans' benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

 Mr. Stump (for himself and Mr. Evans) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the exclusion 
               from gross income for veterans' benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF VETERANS' BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 134 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain military benefits) is amended 
to read as follows:
    ``(a) General Rule.--Gross income shall not include--
            ``(1) any qualified military benefit, and
            ``(2) any other benefit administered by the Secretary of 
        Veterans Affairs.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1984.
                                 <all>
```
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.  333-80450 and  333-91863) and Forms S-3 (File Nos.
33-99736-01,   33-03526-01  and  333-61394-01)  of  Tanger  Properties   Limited
Partnership  of our  reports  dated March 14,  2005  relating  to the  financial
statements,   financial  statement  schedule,  management's  assessment  of  the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control of financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 14, 2005
§ 101-26.4902 GSA forms. ( a ) The GSA forms are illustrated in this § 101-26.4902 to show their text, format, and arrangement and to provide a ready source of reference. The subsection numbers in this section correspond with the GSA form numbers.
( b ) Agency field offices may obtain the GSA forms illustrated in this § 101-26.4902 by submitting their requirements to their Washington headquarters office which will forward consolidated annual requirements to the General Services Administration (BRO), Washington, DC 20405.
[31 FR 7235, May 18, 1966, as amended at 41 FR 34633, Aug. 16, 1976]
#### § 105-68.915 Agent or representative.

*Agent or representative* means any person who acts on behalf of, or who is authorized to commit, a participant in a covered transaction.
1 

## ... T h i s pr oce edi n g ar i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 2008- CI

- 09303 , s t y l ed Kayl a M cGl oi n v. M ar r s Bow m an , pe nd i ng

in t he 5 7 t h Jud i ci al D i st ri ct C o urt , B exar C o unt y , T exas , t he H o no rable Antoni a A rt eaga p res i d i ng ; how ever, t he c h a llen g e d o rd e rs w e re sign e d b y the H o n o ra b le G lo ria S a ld a ñ a , p re sid ing ju d g e o f t h e 2 2 4 th J u d ic ia l D istric t C o u rt, B ex ar C o un t y, T ex as. 

### i i i i i i



# MEM ORA ND UM OP INION

No. 04-09-00471- CV IN RE Marr s BOWMAN Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 

## PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief J ustice Phy lis J . Speedlin , J ustice Rebec ca Simmons , J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Aug ust 19, 2009 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED The c ourt has considere d the petition f or a writ of mandamus filed by rela tor Marr s Bowma

n, and is of the opinion that r elief should be de nied. See T EX 

## . R. A PP 

## . P. 52.8(a) . Acc ording ly , relator’s petition for a wr it of mandamus is denied. PER C URI AM
#### § 102-36.310 Who makes the determination to abandon or destroy excess personal property?

To abandon or destroy excess personal property, an authorized official of your agency makes a written finding that must be approved by a reviewing official who is not directly accountable for the property.
99–006 

112TH CONGRESS REPT. 112–93 " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session Part 2 

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION 

TRANSFER CLARIFICATION ACT 

JULY 19, 2011.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BACHUS, from the Committee on Financial Services, 

submitted the following 

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 

[To accompany H.R. 1667] 

REASONS FOR SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

This supplemental report shows the updated information for the 

Committee Consideration of H.R. 1667, as reported, (H. Rept. 112– 

93): 

COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

The Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit met in open session on May 4, 2011 and ordered H.R. 1667, the 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Transfer Clarification 

Act, favorably reported to the Full Committee by a record vote of 

13 yeas and 8 nays (Record vote no. FI–6). 

The Committee on Financial Services met in open session on 

May 12 and 13, 2011 and ordered H.R. 1667, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Transfer Clarification Act, favorably reported to the House by a record vote of 32 yeas and 26 nays 

(Record vote no. FC–39). 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with REPORTS
3

4

5

1

2

Miami
International
Airport

Morningside

Grapeland
Heights

Coconut
Grove

Little
Havana Dodge
Island

Shenandoah

Virginia


Liberty
City

Silver
Bluff

Little
River

Downtown

Edgewater

The
Roads

Allapattah

Little
Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

Revised	Russell	Plan
Revised Russell Plan: Areas Moved from District 2 into 3 and 4

Hatching indicates areas of focus. 2013 Plan overlaid in blue lines.

.

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 173-13 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
                            METRIS RECEIVABLES, INC.
                               METRIS MASTER TRUST

     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Direct Merchants
Credit Card Bank, National Association,  as Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and
Servicing  Agreement  dated as of May 26, 1995,  amended and  restated  July 30,
1998, as amended (the "Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement"),  by and among Metris
Receivables,  Inc.  (the  "Transferor"),  Direct  Merchants  Credit  Card  Bank,
National  Association,  as  Servicer  and The  Bank of New York  (Delaware),  as
trustee (the "Trustee") does hereby certify that:

     1. Direct Merchants Credit Card Bank, National Association, is Servicer
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

     2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

     3. This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement.

     4. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
January 1, 1999 until December 31, 1999 was conducted under my supervision.

     5. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
fully performed all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
throughout such period and no default in the performance of such obligations has
occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 6 below.

     6. The following is a description of each default in the performance of the
Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, including any Supplement, known to me to have been made during such
period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the
action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the
current status of each such default:

                  None.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate on
March 15, 2000.

                                            DIRECT MERCHANTS CREDIT CARD BANK,
                                            NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


                                                 /s/ Jean Benson
                                            Name:    Jean Benson
                                            Title:   Chief Financial Officer
§ 105-68.515 What specific information is in the EPLS? ( a ) At a minimum, the *EPLS* indicates— ( 1 ) The full name (where available) and address of each excluded or disqualified person, in alphabetical order, with cross references if more than one name is involved in a single action;
( 2 ) The type of action;
( 3 ) The cause for the action;
( 4 ) The scope of the action;
( 5 ) Any termination date for the action;
( 6 ) The agency and name and telephone number of the agency point of contact for the action; and
( 7 ) The Dun and Bradstreet Number (DUNS), or other similar code approved by the GSA, of the excluded or disqualified person, if available.
( b ) ( 1 ) The database for the *EPLS* includes a field for the Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) (the social security number (SSN) for an individual) of an excluded or disqualified person.
( 2 ) Agencies disclose the SSN of an individual to verify the identity of an individual, only if permitted under the Privacy Act of 1974 and, if appropriate, the Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988, as codified in 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
Exhibit 12
                                                                       Form 10-Q
                                                                   For the Three
                                                                    Months Ended
                                                                  March 31, 2000


                                   AT&T Corp.
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                              (Dollars in Millions)
                                   (Unaudited)


Income before income taxes                            $3,051

Add equity investment losses, net of
  distributions of less than 50% owned
  affiliates                                             312

Add fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest        742

Total earnings before income taxes and
  fixed charges                                       $4,105


Fixed Charges:

Total interest expense excluding capitalized
  interest                                            $  555

Capitalized interest                                      68

Interest portion of rental expense                        73

Dividend requirements on subsidiary preferred
  stock and interest on trust preferred
  securities                                             114

  Total fixed charges                                 $  810

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                       5.1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-23142-CIV-SINGHAL

MARIA NOGARA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LYNN LAW OFFICE, P.C., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS MATTER has come before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Compel 

Payment of Experts’ Fees (the “Motion”) (DE [69]), which was referred to the magistrate 

judge for Report and Recommendation. The magistrate judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation (DE [89]) on February 21, 2024, recommending that the Motion be 

granted in part and denied in part. The magistrate judge recommended that Defendants 

be awarded a total of $6,355 in expert deposition fees against Plaintiff pursuant to Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4)(E).

The Court has reviewed the entire file and record and has made a de novo review

of the issues. No objections to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation 

having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (DE [89]) is 

AFFIRMED and ADOPTED.

Case 1:22-cv-23142-AHS Document 90 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/07/2024 Page 1 of 2
2

2. Defendants’ Motion to Compel Payment of Experts’ Fees (DE [69]) is 

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendants are awarded and 

Plaintiff Maria Nogara is taxed a total of $6,355.00 in expert deposition fees 

for the depositions of Robert Burlington, Esq. and Kevin Aderling, Esq.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 7th day of 

March 2024.

Copies furnished counsel via CM/ECF

Case 1:22-cv-23142-AHS Document 90 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/07/2024 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

RICCARDO SILVA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MOBILE BILLBOARDS, INC., et al. 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 1:22-cv-24262-ALTMAN/Reid 

AGREED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF RICCARDO SILVA’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO AMEND PLEADINGS OR 

TO JOIN CERTAIN PARTIES 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Riccardo Silva’s Unopposed Motion 

to Extend Time to Amend Pleadings or to Join Certain Parties (the “Motion”). The Court, having 

reviewed the Motion, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby: 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. The deadline to Amend 

Pleadings or to Join Certain Parties shall be October 31, 2023. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ____ day of ______, 2023. 

_____________________________ 

ROY K. ALTMAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies furnished to: 

All counsel of record 

Case 1:22-cv-24262-RKA Document 45-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2023 Page 1 of 1