alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38300-38301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15455]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Boston Harbor Islands Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463) that the Boston Harbor Islands 
Advisory Council will meet on Wednesday, July 12, 2000. The meeting 
will convene at 4:00 PM at the New England Aquarium, Central Wharf, 
Conference Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
    The Advisory Council was appointed by the Director of National Park 
Service pursuant to Public Law 104-333. The 28 members represent 
business, educational, cultural, and environmental entities; 
municipalities surrounding Boston Harbor; Boston Harbor advocates; and 
Native American interests. The purpose of the Council is to advise and 
make recommendations to the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership with 
respect to the development and implementation of a management plan and 
the operation of the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area.
    The Agenda for this meeting is as follows:

[[Page 38301]]

    1. Approval of minutes from March 2, 2000.
    2. Discussion on the Advisory Council's reccomendation to the 
Partnership regarding the draft General Management Plan.
    The meeting is open to the public. Further information concerning 
Council meetings may be obtained from the Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Council or file written statements. Such requests should be made at 
least seven days prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands NRA, 408 Atlantic Ave., Boston, MA, 02110, telephone (617) 223-
8667.

    Dated: June 9, 2000.
George E. Price, Jr.,
Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA.
[FR Doc. 00-15455 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 1:22-cv-24066-KMM 

GRACE, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF MIAMI, 

Defendant. 

 / 

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF FILING ADMITTED TRIAL EXHIBITS 

(VOLUME I of III) 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5.3(b)(2) and the Court’s Paperless Order Scheduling Trial (ECF 

32), Plaintiffs file the attached exhibits admitted into evidence at trial: 

Plfs.’ 

Tr. Ex. Description 

1 Nov. 18, 2021 Commission Meeting Transcript (Tr. 1) 

2 Dec. 9, 2021 Commission Meeting Transcript (Tr. 2) 

3 Feb. 7, 2022 Commission Meeting Transcript (Tr. 3) 

4 Feb. 25, 2022 Commission Meeting Transcript – Morning (Tr. 4A) 

5 Feb. 25, 2022 Commission Meeting Transcript – Afternoon (Tr.4B) 

6 Mar. 11, 2022 Commission Meeting Transcript – Morning (Tr. 5A) 

7 Mar. 11, 2022 Commission Meeting Transcript – Afternoon (Tr. 5B) 

8 Mar. 24, 2022 Commission Meeting Transcript (Tr. 6) 

9 2022 Cycle De Grandy Contract 

10 Bid Waiver for De Grandy Contract 

11 2021 De Grandy VRA Instructions 

12 Nov. 2022 De Grandy Initial Report Cover Email 

13 Nov. 2022 De Grandy Initial Report 

14 Nov. 18, 2021 De Grandy slides 

15 Feb. 7, 2022 De Grandy Slides 

16 Feb. 7, 2022 De Grandy Talking Points 

17 Feb. 7, 2022 Cody Memo on Areas Moved in Feb. 7 Draft 

18 De Grandy Redistricting Miami 2022 Report 

19 Feb. 25, 2022 De Grandy Slides 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 2
2 

20 Mar. 11, 2022 De Grandy Slides 

21 Alternative: Keep Areas South of US 1 in D2 and Adjust D3 City of Miami

22 Mar. 24, 2022 De Grandy Slides 

23 Feb. 25, 2022 ACLU Letter to City Commission 

24 Mar. 31, 2022 ACLU Letter to Mayor Suarez 

25 Apr. 1, 2022 Mayor Suarez Letter to De Grandy 

26 Apr. 2, 2022 De Grandy Response to Mayor Suarez 

27 May 11, 2023 City Commission Meeting Transcript 

28 Jun. 14, 2023 City Commission Meeting Transcript

Respectfully submitted February 2, 2024, 

 /s/ Caroline A. McNamara 

Nicholas L.V. Warren (FBN 1019018)

ACLU Foundation of Florida

1809 Art Museum Drive, Suite 203 

Jacksonville, FL 32207 

(786) 363-1769 

nwarren@aclufl.org 

Daniel B. Tilley (FBN 102882) 

Caroline A. McNamara (FBN 1038312) 

ACLU Foundation of Florida

4343 West Flagler Street, Suite 400 

Miami, FL 33134 

(786) 363-2714 

dtilley@aclufl.org 

cmcnamara@aclufl.org 

Gregory P. Luib* 

Dechert LLP 

1900 K Street NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

(202) 261-3413 

gregory.luib@dechert.com

Neil A. Steiner*

Julia Markham-Cameron* 

Dechert LLP 

ree Bryant Park

1095 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036

(212) 698-3822 

neil.steiner@dechert.com 

julia.markham-cameron@dechert.com 

Christopher J. Merken* 

Dechert LLP 

Cira Centre 

2929 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19104 

(215) 994-2380 

christopher.merken@dechert.com 

* Admitted pro hac vice 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 170 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 2 of 2
Eagle Sight Photographer LLC requests the following exemptions under Section 333: 

Part	21	Subpart	H			Airworthiness certification

14	C.F.R.	§	45.23(b)			Markings

14	C.F.R.	§	61.113(a)	and	(b)			Private pilot privileges

14	C.F.R.	§	61.133(a)	Commercial pilot privileges

14	C.F.R.	§	91.7(a)	and	(b)	Civil aircraft airworthiness

14	C.F.R.	§	91.119			Minimum safe altitudes

14	C.F.R.	§	91.121		Altimeter settings

14	C.F.R.	§	91.151(a)		Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions

14	C.F.R.	§	91.203(a)(1)	and(2)		conditions Civil aircraft certifications

14	C.F.R.	§	91.405;	407;	409;	417			Maintenance inspections

and also add the same rules to flights as in 95-112 as in the ama guide lines 

would also like to add New Hampshire RSA 231 bridge inspections to list of activity’s of use of my Dji 

Phantom 1 if the state of NH DOT request.

Eagle Sight Photographer will be the sole (pic), In the future may or may not Have a second pic. If it ever 

decides to Eagle Sight Photographer will make sure they have the proper training min 50-flight hrs with the 

proper training and safety procedures As I have over 15 years of R/C flying and R/C Aircraft building. 

And 10 Years as a R/C flight training pilot instructor 

A list of all uses requested

Real Estate

Land surveys

Agricultural

Weddings and special events

Hotels, resorts, gulf courses Inspections

Roof inspections, Insurance Adjusting

Bridge Inspections for DOT if needed

Search and Rescue if Needed (as I’m a first responderFire Departments if needed (as I’m a fire fighter with 

in the state of NH
August 9th, 2015 Page 1 of 2

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

I would like to Submit this letter to the 333 Exemption I filed with you for consideration.

Everything Submitted with be in the interest of the FAA and the general public and fire 

service and search and rescue. 

From:

Jason Bagley

Easgle Sight Photographer LLC

P.O. Box 2412

North Conway, NH 03860-2412 

Phone (603) 986-0056

Email Jbcoos@aol.com

I would also like to ask if the FAA could expedite my application progress. As being in 

the fire service and first responder. As it will benift us in the near by cases, and as in the 

private they will also fill out the proper papers, and ill continue my flight logs and time in 

air. With a sign off for the owners or companys.

Sincerely, 

Jason bagley

(Owner) Eagle Sight Photographer LLC.
#### SOLOMON SCHEU, Respondent, *v.*ERIE RAILWAY COMPANY Appellant.

*Common cmrierr*— *delveery of goods to wrong person*— *liability for*— *distinction between liability of common ca/rriei' a/nd warrelwusema/n.*

Appeal from a judgment entered on tbe decision of a single judge of tbe Superior Court of Buffalo, and transferred to tbis court by order, pursuant to Laws of 1873. (Ob. 239, § 7.)

The action is.brought to recover damages for tbe alleged wrongful delivery of a quantity of malt belonging to tbe plaintiff, wbicb tbe defendant, as a common carrier, received at Lancaster, Erie county, "and undertook to transport and deliver to tbe plaintiff’s consignees, at Newark, New Jersey. Tbe court found that tbe malt was consigned to tbe firm of C. Weidenmeyer & Sons, Newark, New Jersey, and that tbe defendant failed to deliver it to that firm, but wrongfully and negligently delivered it to tbe firm of 0. Weidermyer’s Sons, at Newark, and that tbe latter firm was not tbe con*499signee or owner of the malt or entitled to receive it; that the latter firm was insolvent, and the plaintiff has not received pay for the malt, but, by reason of such wrongful delivery, has lost the same. The court ordered judgment for the plaintiff for the value of the malt.

The court at General Term said: “ Upon the facts found, the judgment is clearly right. If a common carrier deliver goods to a wrong person, although by his own innocent mistake, or by his being imposed upon, he is liable to the true owner for the value. Such wrongful delivery is treated in the common law as a conversion of the property. (Story on Bailments, § 545, *b; McMitee*v. *New Jersey Steamboat Go.,*45 N. Y., 34.) The carrier delivers at his peril. He is responsible as an insurer. His liability differs from that of a warehouseman, who is held only" to the exercise of proper diligence and care in the preservation of the property and its delivery to the trae owner. . *(Price*v. *Oswego and Syracuse It. It. Go.,*50 N. Y., 213, per Grover, J., p. 217.) When goods are safely conveyed to the place of destination, and the consignee is dead, absent, or refuses to receive, or is not known, and cannot, after reasonable diligence, be found, the carrier may be discharged from further responsibility as carrier, by placing them in a proper warehouse ■ for, and on account of the. owner *(Fish*v. *Newton,*1 Den., 45); but until discharged in that manner, his responsibility as carrier continues. *(Price*v. *R. It. Go., supra.)*

*Sprague, Gorham do Bacon,*for the appellant. *Humphrey do Lockwood,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Smith, J.;

Mullir, P. J., and Taloott, J., concurred.

Order affirmed, with costs. .
**Exhibit 18**

 

April 12, 2005

 

AML Communications Inc.

1000 Avenida Acaso

Camarillo, CA  93012

 

 

Dear Sirs/Madams:

 

We have audited the financial statements as of March 31, 2004, and foreach of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2004, included in your Form10-KSB/A to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our reportthereon dated June 4, 2004, except for Note 1 as to which the date is April 12,2005.  Note 2 to such financialstatements contains a description of your adoptionduring the year ended march 31, 2004 for the change in the method of inventoryoverhead allocation.  In our judgement,such change is an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under thecircumstances.

 

 
| /s/ Singer Lewak Greenbaum & Goldstein  LLP |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|

 

SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM AND GOLDSTEIN LLP

Los Angeles, California

 

----
#### Lorraine Reeves, Respondent, v Mark Chesbro et al., Individually and Doing Business as Chesbro Excavating et al., Respondents, and Edwin M. Soble, Jr., Individually and Doing Business as Square Builders, Appellant, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) (And Five Other Actions.)

[628 NYS2d 902]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Following an explosion and fire that occurred at their home during a housewarming party, Carl J. Caltabiano, Jr., and Kathleen Caltabiano and various party guests commenced actions against, *inter alia,*defendant Soble, individually and doing business as Square Builders (Soble), the general contractor, and the remaining defendants, who performed excavation services, installed propane lines and supplied propane gas service. The complaints alleged that Soble had himself been negligent and that he was vicariously liable for the negligence of subcontractors. Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Soble for summary judgment dismissing the complaints against him. With respect to direct negligence, the parties opposing the motion raised issues of fact whether Soble had agreed to be responsible for overseeing the entire project. With respect to vicarious liability, the parties opposing the motion raised an issue of fact whether the installation of the propane lines was inherently dangerous. A contractor may be held vicariously liable for the acts of an independent contractor employed by him to perform inherently dangerous work *(see, Rosenberg v Equitable Life Assur. Socy.,*79 NY2d 663, 668-670, *rearg dismissed*82 NY2d 825; *Reid v Styco of Rochester,*214 AD2d 955). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
#### § 102-75.1235 Where should an agency send its written response to the “Notice of Availability”?

Look for the contact information provided in the Notice of Availability. Most likely, an agency will be directed to contact one of GSA's regional offices.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00751-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.F.R., JR. and G.L.R., Children

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-01451

Honorable John Gabriel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, that portion of the trial court’s 

September 1, 2015 Order concerning the division of the marital estate is REVERSED and we

REMAND the cause to the trial court for a new trial on the division of the marital estate. The 

remainder of the order is AFFIRMED.

Costs are assessed against the party that incurred them.

SIGNED July 20, 2016.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 32





C.E.O. and C.F.O.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 27, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





/s/ Paul R. Cook




___________________________________


Paul R. Cook


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and


Chief Financial Officer


American Consumers, Inc.








Date:  April 13, 2010
Natoma

Manors

Bay

Heights

Golden Pines

North

Grove

Shorecrest

Bay Point

Miami International Airport

Morningside

Grapeland Heights

Little Havana Dodge Island

Shenandoah

Virginia Key

Auburndale

Liberty City

Silver Bluff

Wynwood

Little River

Downtown

The Roads

Allapattah

Little Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

C

O

C

O

N

U

T

G

R

O

V

E

pU

ep Er sa St edi

r et a wegdE

R

e

s

olu

tio

n

2

3

-

2

7

1

Ve

rsio

n

1

2

D

3

A

l

t. Map

v.3

Ci

ty’s

Pr

op

o

s

e

d

R

e

m

e

dy

Districts

12345

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 173-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Jacob Inbar,Chief Executive Officer of AML Communications Inc., (the “Company”), certifythat:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of AML Communications, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 26, 2006
| /s/ JACOB INBAR          |
|--------------------------|
| Jacob Inbar,             |
| Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
ECN_2012_US_21I3.txt [8/2/2015 12:22:06 PM] EC1221I3 Mining: Industry Series: Selected Supplies, Minerals Received for Preparation, Purchased Machinery, and Fuels Consumed by Type for the U.S.: 2012

Release Date : 02/27/2015

Data based on the 2012 Economic Census. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Methodology. Data in this table represent those available when this file was created; data may not be available for all NAICS industries or geographies. Data in this table may be subject to employment- and/or sales-size minimums that vary by industry.

For information on economic census geographies, including changes for 2012, see the economic census Help Center.

Table Name Mining: Industry Series: Selected Supplies, Minerals Received for Preparation, Purchased Machinery, and Fuels Consumed by Type for the United States: 2012

ReleaseSchedule Data are scheduled for release on a flow basis beginning in July 2014 and ending in December 2014.

Universe The universe includes all establishments classified in mining sector 21 with one or more paid employee at any time during the year.

GeographyCoverage

Data are shown at the U.S. level.

IndustryCoverage Data are shown at the six-digit North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) level.

Data ItemsandOtherIdentifyingRecords

This file contains data on:

Consumption quantity Delivered cost ($1,000) Data are also identified by supplies and fuels consumed by type.

Sort Order Data are presented in ascending NAICS code by material code sequence.

FTP Download Download the entire table at http://www2.census.gov/econ2012/EC/sector21/EC1221I3.zipECN_2012_US_21I3.txt [8/2/2015 12:22:06 PM] ContactInformation U.S. Census Bureau, Economy Wide Statistics Division Data User Outreach and Education Staff Washington, DC 20233-6900 Tel: (800) 242-2184 Tel: (301) 763-5154 ewd.outreach@census.gov

X Not applicable

D Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies; data are included in higher level totals

S Withheld because estimate did not meet publication standards.

(q) 20 to 29 percent estimated

(p) 10 to 19 percent estimated

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 Economic Census Note: The data in this file are based on the 2012 Economic Census. To maintain confidentiality, the U.S. Census Bureau suppresses data to protect the identity of any business or individual. The census results in this file contain nonsampling error. Data users who create their own estimates using data from this file should cite the U.S. Census Bureau as the source of the original data only. For the full technical documentation, see Methodology link in above headnote.

Symbols:D - Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies; data are included in higher level totalsN - Not available or not comparableFor a complete list of all economic programs symbols, see the Symbols Glossary
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 

[***] Certain information in this document has been omitted from this exhibit because it is both (i) not material and (ii) would
be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed. 
 AMENDMENT #1 

TO 
 PROJECT RIDER #3

 COLLABORATION AGREEMENT 
 This
Amendment #1 (“Amendment #1”) is entered into effective as of the date of the final signature executing this Amendment #1 (“Amendment #1 Effective Date”), by and between Magenta Therapeutics, Inc.
(“Magenta”) and National Marrow Donor Program d/b/a Be The Match Biotherapies (“BTMB”), (each a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”) as those Parties are defined in
Attachment A, Project Rider #3, effective September 6, 2018 (collectively, the “Project Rider #3”). 
 WHEREAS, the Parties executed a
Collaboration Agreement, effective November 10, 2017, and Project Rider #3, effective September 6, 2018; and 
 WHEREAS, the Parties agree to
extend the term of the Project Rider #3. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for the valuable consideration contained herein, and intending to be legally bound, Magenta and
BTMB agree to the following amendment to be effective as of the Amendment #1 Effective Date as follows: 
 Amendment to Project Rider #3 

 

	 	1.	 Delete the current term in Section D. Term of Project Rider #3 in its entirety and replace
it with the following to read as follows: 


 “The term of this Rider shall commence on the Rider effective date set
forth above and continue in effect through [***].” 
 This Amendment #1 is executed by individuals who are duly authorized to legally bind their
respective parties as of the Amendment #1 Effective Date: 
  

									
	MAGENTA THERAPEUTICS, INC.	 		 	NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM d/b/a BE THE MATCH BIOTHERAPIES
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Angelene Simonello 

	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Mary Frey 


		 	Authorized Signature	 		 		 	Authorized Signature
					
		 	 Angelene Simonello
	 		 		 	 Mary Frey 


		 	(Typed/Printed Name)	 		 		 	(Typed/Printed Name)
					
	Title:	 	VP Program Lead	 		 	Title:	 	Contracts & Procurement Director
					
	Date:	 	8/26/19	 		 	Date:	 	8/21/19
#### § 101-1.102 Federal Property Management Regulations.

The Federal Property Management Regulations (FPMR) are regulations, as described by § 101-1.101, prescribed by the Administrator of General Services to govern and guide Federal agencies.