alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5675 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5675

 To amend title 39, United States Code, with respect to ``cooperative 
                              mailings''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2000

 Mr. Ehrlich introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, with respect to ``cooperative 
                              mailings''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COOPERATIVE MAILINGS.

    Section 3626(j) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(4)(A) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or any 
rule or regulation of the Postal Service, in the case of mail matter 
sent, or proposed to be sent, by (or on behalf of) an authorized 
organization having a contractual or any other business relationship 
with an entity described in subparagraph (B)(ii), rates of postage 
under former section 4452(b) or 4452(c) of this title shall apply if 
those rates would apply in the case of identical mail matter sent by 
such organization absent such relationship.
    ``(B) For purposes of this paragraph--
            ``(i) the term `authorized organization' means an 
        organization authorized to mail at the rates for mail under 
        former section 4452(b) or 4452(c) of this title; and
            ``(ii) an entity described in this clause is any 
        organization or other person (within the meaning of section 1 
        of title 1) that is not an authorized organization.''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE; SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to clarify section 
3626(j)(1)(D)(ii) of title 39, United States Code.
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of the Congress that 
nothing in this Act should be considered to alter the authority of the 
United States Postal Service--
            (1) to apply regular rates of postage, rather than 
        nonprofit rates, to mail matter described in subparagraph (A), 
        (B), (C), or (D)(i) of section 3626(j)(1) of title 39, United 
        States Code; or
            (2) to enforce any criminal law within its jurisdiction.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 105-72.205 Metric system of measurement.

The Metric Conversion Act, as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act (15 U.S.C. 205) declares that the metric system is the preferred measurement system for U.S. trade and commerce. The Act requires each Federal agency to establish a date or dates in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, when the metric system of measurement will be used in the agency's procurements, grants, and other business-related activities. Metric implementation may take longer where the use of the system is initially impractical or likely to cause significant inefficiencies in the accomplishment of federally-funded activities. Federal awarding agencies shall follow the provisions of E.O. 12770, “Metric Usage in Federal Government Programs.”
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00073

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF Z.J., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 322nd District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 322

- 679090

- 20 )

Au gust 5, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 20, 2000 / Notices 38255

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00–42]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104–

164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 00–42 with

attached transmittal and policy

justification.

Dated: June 13, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

38256 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 20, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 20, 2000 / Notices 38257

38258 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 20, 2000 / Notices

[FR Doc. 00–15438 Filed 6–19–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–C
#### § 105-74.665 State.

*State* means any of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States.
#### § 102-75.1255 What happens when more than one agency has a valid interest in the property?

GSA will attempt to facilitate an equitable solution between the agencies involved. However, the Administrator has final decision making authority in determining which requirement aligns with the Federal Government's best interests.
§ 105-54.101 Applicability. This part 105-54 applies to all advisory committees for which GSA has responsibility. This part also applies to any committee that advises GSA officials even if the committee were not established for that purpose. This applicability, however, is limited to the period of the committee's use as an advisory body. This part does not apply to: ( a ) An advisory committee exempted by an Act of Congress;
( b ) A local civic group whose primary function is to render a public service in connection with a Federal program;
( c ) A State or local committee, council, board, commission, or similar group established to advise or make recommendations to State or local officials or agencies;
( d ) A meeting initiated by the President or one or more Federal official(s) for the purpose of obtaining advice or recommendations from one individual;
( e ) A meeting with a group initiated by the President or one or more Federal official(s) for the sole purpose of exchanging facts or information;
( f ) A meeting initiated by a group with the President or one or more Federal official(s) for the purpose of expressing the group's views, provided that the President or Federal official(s) does not use the group recurrently as a preferred source of advice or recommendations;
( g ) A committee that is established to perform primarily operational as opposed to advisory functions. Operational functions are those specifically provided by law, such as making or implementing Government decisions or policy. An operational committee would be covered by the Act if it becomes primarily advisory in nature;
( h ) A meeting initiated by a Federal official(s) with more than one individual for the purpose of obtaining the advice of individual attendees and not for the purpose of utilizing the group to obtain consensus advice or recommendations. However, such a group would be covered by the Act when an agency accepts the group's deliberations as a source of consensus advice or recommendations;
( i ) A meeting of two or more advisory committee or subcommittee members convened solely to gather information or conduct research for a chartered advisory committee, to analyze relevant issues and facts, or to draft proposed position papers for deliberation by the advisory committee or a subcommittee of the advisory committee; and
( j ) A committee composed wholly of full-time officers or employees of the Federal Government.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671

DELIO BATISTA,

CARLOS LOPEZ,

MARIANA LOPEZ, and

RAFAELA VALIENTE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC.,

REINIER CORTES, and

ANDREA GONZALEZ QUINTERO,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF FILING DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. Transcript from Deposition Relied Upon By Defendants

1. Deposition Transcript of Defendant Reinier Cortes taken on April 11, 2023. 

II. Declarations Relied upon by Defendants. 

2. Declaration of AVANT ASSURANCE INC. President REINIER CORTES 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been filed via electronic

communication this 19TH DAY OF May, 2023 with the Clerk of Court and served upon all Counsel

of Record.

 Daniel E. Tropp

Daniel E. Tropp, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 948128

CUETO LAW GROUP P.L.

Attorneys for Defendants 

4000 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Ste 470

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel.: (305) 777 0377

Primary Email: dantropp@cuetolawgroup.com

Secondary email dantroppesq@gmail.com

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 69-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 69-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2023 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on February 9, 2000, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute (“SwRI”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Pure Energy Corporation, New York, NY has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Southwest Research Institute (“SwRI”) intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On January 12, 2000, Southwest Research Institute (“SwRI”) filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. A notice has not yet been published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-15596 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 102-40.85 Is donee certification required for the donation of personal property requiring special handling?

Yes, the transfer document must contain a full description of the actual or potential hazard(s) and restriction(s) associated with the handling, storage, use, transportation or disposal of the item. GSA will not approve a donation to a State Agency for Surplus Property (SASP) unless an eligible donee has been identified. This subpart does not prohibit a SASP from bringing an item requiring special handling into its warehouse or other place of storage, provided that this storage is of a temporary nature, that the storage arrangement is agreeable to all parties involved in the donation, and that the storage location has the necessary facilities, gear, and trained personnel to handle, store, protect, and transport the property. In addition, the following certification (or an equivalent) must be signed by the donee:

I (We), the undersigned, hereby certify that the donee has knowledge and understanding of the nature of the property hereby donated which requires special handling, and will comply with all applicable Federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations with respect to the care, handling, storage, shipment, and disposal of the property. The donee agrees and certifies that the United States shall not be liable for personal injuries to, disabilities of, or death of the donee or the donee's employees, or any other person arising from or incident to the donation of the property, its use, or its final disposition. Additionally, the donee agrees and certifies to hold the United States harmless from and shall indemnify the United States against any or all debts, liabilities, judgments, costs, demands, suits, actions, or claims of any nature arising from or incident to the donation of the property, its use, or final disposition.

Name and title of Donee (print or type)

Signature of Donee
Skip to site content

# SDPI Reports to Congress

The Special Diabetes Program for Indians (SDPI) Reports to Congress highlight the program’s ongoing and outstanding contributions to improvements in diabetes care and health outcomes for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people. As documented in the most recent (2020) report, there have been decreases in diabetes prevalence and diabetes-related mortality and kidney failure. Read the full report to learn more about SDPI and its positive impact on AI/AN people and communities.

## SDPI 2020 Report to Congress

**Download theSDPI 2020 Report to Congress**[PDF – 5 MB]

----

### Previous Reports to Congress

**2014**
Changing the Course of Diabetes:        Turning Hope into Reality[PDF - 472 KB]

**2011**
Making Progress        Toward a Healthier Future[PDF - 11 MB]

**2007**
On the Path to a        Healthier Future[PDF - 48 MB]

----

### For More Information

Diabetes-Related Facts Sheets and Publications – Information about diabetes and related health conditions in AI/AN people, SDPI, and the Diabetes Prevention/Healthy Heart (DP/HH) programs. 

IHS Newsroom Reports to Congress – Find more published IHS Reports to Congress on this webpage.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Adam M. Moskowitz

Joseph M. Kaye

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

Service@moskowitz-law.com

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice)

Stephen Neal Zack

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800, Miami, FL 33131

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 58-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 58-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.22.1
                                    AMENDMENT
                                     to the
                                ALBERTSON'S, INC.
                        1990 DEFERRED COMPENSATION TRUST

         This  Amendment is made by  Albertson's,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation
(the "Corporation" or the "Employer").

                                    RECITALS:

     A.  The  Corporation  has  established  the  Albertson's,   Inc.   Deferred
Compensation Trust, effective November 20, 1990 (the "Trust");

         B. The Corporation,  pursuant to Section 6.01 of the Trust, retains the
right to amend  the Trust at any time  prior to the time  when the  Trust  shall
become irrevocable pursuant to Section 6.02 thereof; and

         C. The Corporation  certifies that the Trust has not become irrevocable
pursuant to Section 6.02 thereof; and

         D. The  Corporation  has  determined  that it is advisable to amend the
Trust in the manner hereinafter set forth.

                                    AMENDMENT

         The  Trust is  hereby  amended,  as of  December  1,  1998,  to add the
following  language  at the end of the  definition  of  "Change in  Control"  in
Article 1:

         Notwithstanding  the foregoing,  the occurrence of any of the foregoing
         events or transactions shall not be deemed to be a Change in Control of
         the  Employer,  if prior to the  consummation  of any of the  foregoing
         events  or  transactions,  the  Continuing  Directors  (as  defined  in
         paragraph 1 of Article TWELFTH of the Employer's  Restated  Certificate
         of Incorporation,  dated May 27, 1998) adopt a resolution to the effect
         that a Change in Control  for the  purposes  of this Trust shall not be
         deemed to have  occurred  upon the  consummation  of any such  event or
         transaction.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  instrument  has been duly  executed  by the
undersigned  on this  1st  day of  December,  1998  and has  been  delivered  by
facsimile  to the Trustee (as that term is defined in the Trust) of the Trust on
this 1st day of December, 1998.

                                           ALBERTSON'S, INC.



                                           By: /s/  Thomas R. Saldin
                                               Thomas R. Saldin
                                               Executive Vice President and
                                               General Counsel

<PAGE>
#### § 105-64.209 What special conditions apply to accessing law enforcement and security records?

Law enforcement and security records are generally exempt from disclosure to individuals except when the system manager, in consultation with legal counsel and the Head of the Service or Staff Office or Regional Administrator or their representatives, determines that information in a record has been used or is being used to deny you any right, privilege, or benefit for which you are eligible or entitled under Federal law. If so, the system manager will notify you of the existence of the record and disclose the information, but only to the extent that the information does not identify a confidential source. If disclosure of information could reasonably be expected to identify a confidential source, the record will not be disclosed to you unless it is possible to delete all such information. A confidential source is a person or persons who furnished information during Federal investigations with the understanding that his or her identity would remain confidential.
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Thomas Davis, Plaintiff,

v.

Miami-Dade County, Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 22-23715-Civ-Scola

Judgment

The Court has dismissed this case. (Order, ECF No. 32.) The Court now 

enters judgment in favor of the Defendant, and against the Plaintiff, as required 

by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court directs the Clerk to close this 

case.

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on July 25, 2023.

___________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:22-cv-23715-RNS Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2023 Page 1 of 1
Argued and submitted February 2,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration on petition and on cross-petition September 6, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of William F. Mackey, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Mackey Roofing Company, *Petitioners - Cross-Respondents, v.*William F. MACKEY, *Respondent - Cross-Petitioner.*

(93-03321; CA A85053)

901 P2d 920

David L. Runner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioners - cross-respondents. With him on the briefs were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Nancy F. A. Chapman argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent - cross-petitioner.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*541PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board assessing a penalty for its unreasonable delay in accepting claimant’s claim. Claimant cross-petitions from the Board’s order denying his claim for attorney fees.

The statutes pertinent to this petition and cross-petition have been amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332. Because the amended version of the statutes is applicable here, we remand for reconsideration in the light of the new law. *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration on petition and on cross-petition.
### Served: October 3 , 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 3 rd of October, 2012

Essential Air Service at

AKUTAN

, ALASKA

Under 49 U.S.C. 4173 1 et seq

. DOCKET DOT

- OST

- 200 0

- 7068

NOTICE OF EXTENSION FOR PROPOSALS AT AKUTAN

, ALASKA

By Order 20 12

- 8

- 39, August 31, 2012, the Department requested proposals for Essent ial Air

Service (EAS) at Akutan

, Alaska , with proposals due October 3 , 2012

. On October 2, 2012

, Grant Aviation , Inc., requested a one

- week extension to that deadline

.

We will grant th at extension request. Proposals at Akutan are now due on October 10

, 2012.

Dennis DeVany, Chief,

EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic v ersion of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov