2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 12-20-2007 

# U SA v . Geddes P r e c e de nt i al or N on-P r e c e de nt i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 06-3335

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . Ge dde s " (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 25. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/25H onor abl e J ane A . R es t ani , C hi ef J udge of the U ni t ed St at es C our tof * I nt ernat i onal T r ade, s i t t i ng bydes i gnat i on. 1 NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL

U N I TED STA TES C O U RT O F A PPEA LS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

______ N o. 06- 3335

______ UNI T E D S T AT E S OF AM E RI CA , A p p e l l e e v. A A RO N G ED D ES, A ppel l ant A ppeal fr om t he U ni t ed St at es D i s t r i ctC our tfort he D i s t r i ctof N ew J er s ey ( D . C . N o. 02- cr - 00705) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e M aryL . C ooper Subm i t t ed U nderT hi r d C i r cui tL A R 34. 1( a)

D ece m ber11, 2007 B efor e: SL O V I T E R , A M B R O , C i r cui tJ udges , and R E ST A N I , J udge * ( Fi l ed: D ece m ber20, 2007) OP I NI ONJudg e S l ov i t er agr ees that G ri er r epresent s the law of the C i rcui t . N on et heles s, 1 s he bel i eves t hatG eddes ’ ar gum entr epr es ent s t he bett ervi ew , as s etfor t h i n herdi s s ent in G ri er. 2 R E ST A N I , J udge. T his app eal chall eng es a sent ence im po sed afterrem and t o ap plyt he U nit ed S t at es S en tenc ing G u idelines in an ad v isorym an n er a s req u ir ed b yU n it ed S tat es v . B o o k er, 543 U . S. 220 ( 2005) . D efe ndantA ar on G eddes w as found gui l t yof vi ol at i on of 18 U . S. C . § 922( g) ( 1) ( fel on i n pos s es s i on of a f i r earm ) . I n cal cul at i ng t he G ui del i nes ra n g e , the D istric t C o u rt im p o se d a f o u r-le v e l en h a n c e m e n t f o r u sin g a f

ire a rm in connec t i on w i t h anotherfel ony . T he D i s t r i ctC our tfound thatt he fa ct s nece s s aryt o t he enhanc ementw er e es t abl i s hed bya pr eponder ance of the evi dence . G e d d e s’ s o le a rg u m e n t o n a p p e a l is th a t d u e p ro c e ss re q u ire s th a t if a se p a ra te cr i m e i s t he bas i s fora s ent enci ng enhanc ement , t he el ement s of thatcr i m e mustbe found b yth e trier o f

f a c t b e y o n d a re a so n a b le d o u b t. S itt in g e n b a n c , w e re c e n tlyre jec ted th is ar gum ent , s ee U ni t ed St at es v. G r i er , 475 F. 3d 556 ( 3d C i r . 2007) , and hel d t hat se n ten c in g e n h a n c e m e n ts, w h e th e r c o n stitu tin g a se p a ra te o f f e n se o r n o t, do n o t im p lica te r i ght s t o a j ur yt r i al orpr oof bey ond a r eas onabl e doubt . I d. at567. 1 Ac c o r d i n g l y , we wi l l a f f i r m.