alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 643 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 643

  To redesignate the Federal building located at 10301 South Compton 
  Avenue, in Los Angeles, California, and known as the Watts Finance 
      Office, as the ``Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1999

Ms. Millender-McDonald (for herself, Mr. Becerra, Ms. Pelosi, Ms. Lee, 
 Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Berman, Mr. Waxman, 
   Mr. Matsui, Mr. Cunningham, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Horn, Mr. Rogan, Mr. 
   Martinez, Mr. Calvert, and Mr. Farr of California) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To redesignate the Federal building located at 10301 South Compton 
  Avenue, in Los Angeles, California, and known as the Watts Finance 
      Office, as the ``Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 10301 South Compton Avenue, in Los 
Angeles, California, and known as the Watts Finance Office, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Augustus F. 
Hawkins Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 102-118.555 Can a TSP file a supplemental administrative claim?

Yes, a TSP may file a supplemental administrative claim. Each supplemental claim must cover charges relating to one paid transportation document.
Strafford

No. 78-217

#### Lorraine M. DePaolo v. Spaulding Fibre Company, Inc. Dominic J. DePaolo v. Spaulding Fibre Company, Inc.

February 14, 1979

*Mullaney & Richardson,*of Rochester *(Stanley J. Mullaney*orally), for the plaintiffs.

*Wiggin & Nourie,*of Manchester *(James W.Donchess*orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum

This is an appeal from the granting of the defendant’s motions to dismiss actions brought by the plaintiffs, an employee and his wife, for injuries caused by a machine manufactured by the defendant. The defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by *Mullavey,*J.

On December 21, 1972, the plaintiff employee of the defendant, Spaulding Fibre Company, Inc., suffered an electric shock at the defendant’s production plant while operating an allegedly defective heating fabrication machine. For purposes of this motion this machine is assumed to have been designed and manufactured by the defendant and was used solely in its plant as an instrument for its raw material manufacturing process.

*90As a result of the injury, the plaintiff employee received workmen’s compensation benefits from his employer’s insurance carrier. The present action is brought by the plaintiff employee against his employer to recover for injuries allegedly caused by the employer’s negligent design and manufacture of the heating fabrication machine. Although the husband employee relies on a California case that would permit this products liability action against the employer manufacturer, *Douglas v. E. & J. Gallo Winery,*69 Cal. App. 3d 103, 137 Cal. Rptr. 797 (1977), even that case recognized that there could be no recovery where, as here, the product was not sold to the public. *See Shook v. Jacuzzi,*59 Cal. App. 3d 978, 129 Cal. Rptr. 496 (1976). The motion to dismiss was properly granted as to the husband employee.

The plaintiff wife’s action, however, is maintainable because the injury occurred on December 21,1972, which was prior to the 1973 amendment to RSA 281:12 barring “direct” actions against an employer by a wife for loss of consortium. *See Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc.,*118 N.H. 623, 392 A.2d 587 (1978).

*Exceptions overruled in part, sustained in part; remanded.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

KENNETH C. GRIFFIN,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,

 Defendants.

Case No. 1:22-cv-24023-RNS/GOODMAN

NOTICE OF STRIKING DOCKET ENTRY 32

Plaintiff Kenneth C. Griffin, by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the

Clerk’s Notice to Filer (D.E. 33), hereby strikes the document filed as (D.E. 32) dated August 7,

2023. Plaintiff’s Notice of Selection of Mediator will soon hereafter be filed, which the clerk

requested be refiled.

August 9, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jason D. Sternberg

Jason D. Sternberg

Florida Bar No. 72887

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &

SULLIVAN, LLP

2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1550

Miami, Florida 33133-5417

Telephone: (305) 402-4880

Fax: (305) 901-2975

jasonsternberg@quinnemanuel.com

Attorney for Kenneth C. Griffin

Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2023 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 9th day of August, 2023, a true and correct copy of the

foregoing document was electronically transmitted to all counsel of record via the CM/ECF

system.

By: /s/ Jason D. Sternberg

Jason D. Sternberg

Florida Bar No. 72887

jasonsternberg@quinnemanuel.com

Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2023 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2844-000]


Ameren Services Company; Notice of Filing

June 16, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 7, 2000, Ameren Services Company (ASC), 
tendered for filing Service Agreements for Non-Firm Point-to-Point 
Transmission Services between ASC and Amerada Hess Corporation, 
Connectiv Energy Supply, Inc. and Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC 
(the parties). ASC asserts that the purpose of the Agreements is to 
permit ASC to provide transmission service to the parties pursuant to 
Ameren's Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said application 
should file a Motion to Intervene or Protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 221 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before June 26, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a Petition 
to Intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15736 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 102-33.190 What are the aircraft operations and ownership costs for which we must account? You must account for the operations and ownership costs of your Government aircraft, including your Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), as described in the “U.S. Government Aircraft Cost Accounting Guide” (CAG), available at (*http://www.gsa.gov/aviationpolicy*), which follows OMB Circular A-126 (*http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb*). To account for aircraft costs, you must do at least the following: ( a ) Justify acquisitions to support the agency's aviation program;
( b ) Justify the use of Government aircraft in lieu of commercially available aircraft, and the use of one Government aircraft in lieu of another;
( c ) Develop a variable cost rate for each aircraft or aircraft type (*i.e.,* make and model) in your inventory;
( d ) Recover the costs of operating Government aircraft;
( e ) Determine the cost effectiveness of various aspects of agency aircraft programs; and
( f ) Accumulate aircraft program costs following the procedures defined in the CAG, available at (*http://www.gsa.gov/aviationpolicy*).
§ 109-38.301-1.50 Authorization for transportation between residence and place of employment. ( a ) Government motor vehicles shall not be used for transportation between residence and place of employment by designated contractor personnel except under extenuating circumstances specifically provided for under the terms of the contract. Examples of circumstances eligible for prior approval of home-to-work motor vehicle use which would be appropriate to include in the terms of the contract include: Use related to safety or security operations, use related to compelling operational considerations, and use determined as cost effective to DOE's interest. Under no circumstances shall the comfort and convenience, or managerial position, of contractor employees be considered justification for authorization of use.
( b ) The use of Government motor vehicles for transportation between residence and place of employment (including sporadic use) by designated contractor personnel shall be approved in writing by the Head of the field organization or designee, with delegation no lower than the Director, Office of Management and Program Secretarial Officer (PSO) or the equivalent position at other DOE contracting activities provided that the individual is a warranted contracting officer. The contractor's request for approval shall include the name and title of the employee, the reason for the use, and the expected duration of the use. Each authorization is limited to one year, but can be extended for an unlimited number of additional one-year periods.
#### § 102-5.35 Who is authorized home-to-work transportation?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67866, Aug. 22, 2024.

By statute, certain Federal officials are authorized home-to-work transportation, as are employees who meet certain statutory criteria as determined by their agency head. The Federal officials authorized by statute are the President, the Vice-President, and other principal Federal officials and their designees, as provided in 31 U.S.C. 1344(b)(1) through (b)(7). Those employees engaged in field work, or faced with a clear and present danger, an emergency, or a compelling operational consideration may be authorized home-to-work transportation as determined by their agency head. No other employees are authorized home-to-work transportation.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb $>tates ~ourt of ~peaIs

for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

CLEARVALUE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

AND

RICHARD ALAN HAASE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PEARL RIVER POLYMERS, INC., POLYCHEMIE,

INC., SNF, INC., POLYDYNE, INC., AND SNF

HOLDING COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1595

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas in case no. 06-CV-0197, Chief

Judge Leonard Davis.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Case: 12-1595 Document: 20 Page: 1 Filed: 09/24/2012
CLEARVALUE, INC. V. PEARL RIVER POLYMERS, INC. 2

Richard Alan Haase moves for a 60-day extension of

time, until December 14, 2012, to file his brief. Haase

states that the appellees oppose.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

SEP 24 2012

Date

cc: Richard Alan Haase

Howard L. Close, Esq.

s27

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE F"7nr:~,", 1 r.'RClIIT

SEP 24 ~Ul~

JAN HORBALY

CLERK

Case: 12-1595 Document: 20 Page: 2 Filed: 09/24/2012
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiary                             State of Names Under Which
Name                                   Incorporation        Subsidiary Does Business
----                                   -------------        ------------------------
<S>                                    <C>                   <C>      <C>

Childtime Childcare, Inc.              Illinois              (i)      Childtime Children's Center
                                                             (ii)     Childtime/Northern Illinois Medical Center Child Care Center
                                                             (iii)    Childtime/St. Francis Hospital Child Care Center
                                                             (iv)     Company Kids
                                                             (v)      Little Learners
                                                             (vi)     McNary Child Development Center
                                                             (vii)    Palo Alto Preschool
                                                             (viii)   Supertots
                                                             (ix)     Sutton Country Day School
                                                             (x)      Stepping Stones
                                                             (xi)     Tulsa Child Development Center
                                                             (xii)    Little Eagles
                                                             (xiii)   Fallon Federal Child Care Center
                                                             (xiv)    Center Street Park & Ride Child Care Center
                                                             (xv)     Oxford Learning Center
                                                             (xvi)    Lovelace Child Development Center
                                                             (xvii)   Childtime at Choices
                                                             (xviii)  The Oakwood Schools
                                                             (xix)    VIP Kids

Childtime Childcare -
Michigan, Inc.                         Michigan              (i)      Childtime Childcare - Michigan, Inc.

Childtime Childcare -
PMC, Inc.                              Michigan              (i)      Childtime Childcare - PMC, Inc.
</TABLE>

















                                       E-3
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), John M. Slusser and Dorrance W. Lamb, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Performance Technologies, Incorporated, certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Performance Technologies, Incorporated.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Performance Technologies, Incorporated and will be retained by Performance Technologies, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Date:  March 31, 2011                                                       By:/s/    John M. Slusser           

                                                                                                John M. Slusser

                                                                                                President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Date:  March 31, 2011                                                       By:/s/   Dorrance W. Lamb      

                                                                                                Dorrance W. Lamb

                                                                                                Senior Vice President and 

                                                                                                Chief Financial Officer 

 

**** 

 

 

121
EXHIBIT
      32.2







CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350







The
      undersigned officer of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies
      that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
      2006 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
      Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under
      the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange
      Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b) (32), this certification
      (A)
      shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
      otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
      to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or
      the
      Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
      it
      by reference.







Date:
      July 10, 2007


/s/
      CLAUDIA M.
      PIEROPAN


Name:
      Claudia M. Pieropan


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
ATTACHMENT I

GPC
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStudies related to ocean dynamics. Task 3.2: Aircraft Field Test Program to investigate the ability of remote sensing methods to measure current/wind-wave interactionsThe feasibility of remote sensing of current flows in the ocean and the remote sensing of ocean currents by backscattering cross section techniques was studied. It was established that for capillary waves, small scale currents could be accurately measured through observation of wave kinematics. Drastic modifications of waves by changing currents were noted. The development of new methods for the measurement of capillary waves are discussed. Improvement methods to resolve data processing problems are suggested.Document ID19860015629Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHuang, N. E.*(Applied Science Associates, Inc. Apex, NC, United States)*Flood, W. A.*(Applied Science Associates, Inc. Apex, NC, United States)*Brown, G. S.*(Applied Science Associates, Inc. Apex, NC, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1975Subject CategoryOceanographyReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-168349NAS 1.26:168439Accession Number86N25100Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS6-2520Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860015629.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EUGENE LAMONT DAVIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 12 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Unpublished Memorandum and 

Order of the Superior Court at No. 

1440 EDA 2015 entered on December 

12, 2017, remanding the Order of the 

Philadelphia County Court of Common 

Pleas at No. CP-51-CR-0009685-

2014 entered on April 13, 2015

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2ND day of July, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The Superior Court’s order is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to 

the trial court to reconsider Petitioner’s motion to dismiss in light of this Court’s decision 

in Commonwealth v. Perfetto, 2019 WL 1866653 (Pa. 2019).
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
136228 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan ROBERT BABUR BASAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 136228 COA: 282091 Lenawee CC: 07-002737-AH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

l0616 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2008

Clerk
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                      |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------- | -
|                                      |  | State or OtherJurisdiction ofIncorporation |  | PercentageOwnership |  
|Parent                                |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.                |  | Maryland                                   |  |                    |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|Subsidiary (1)                        |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|The Patapsco Bank                     |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %
|                                      |  |                                           
|Subsidiaries of The Patapsco Bank (1) |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|                                      |  |                                           
|PFSL Holding Corp.                    |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %
|                                      |  |                                           
|Prime Business Leasing                |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %
|                                      |  |                                           
|Patapsco Financial Services, Inc.     |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %



|(1) | The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements appearing in Item 7 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------