alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 101-26.501-3 Consolidated purchase program. ( a ) Except as noted in § 101-26.501(a) and where motor vehicle requirements can not be satisfied under the standardized buying programs described in § 101-26.501-2, GSA will continue to make consolidated procurements of all motor vehicle types each year to achieve maximum benefits and economies, as follows: ( 1 ) Family buys—Large annual consolidated buys for sedans, station wagons, and standard light trucks, purchased in the aggregate by group to the extent practical. These procurements are designed to obtain the best market prices available and are normally definite quantity type with maximum option potential. It is anticipated that resulting contracts will remain in place from approximately mid-November to approximately May 1 (or end of model year closeout).
( 2 ) Two (2) volume procurements each year for light trucks of the types covered by Federal standard Nos. 292 and 307, but not covered by standardized buying programs or family buys, as previously described. Requisitions to be included under these two procurements should reach the GSA Automotive Commodity Center by June 15 and December 1 respectively.
( 3 ) Up to three (3) consolidated procurements for medium and heavy trucks and buses of the types covered by Federal standard No. 794, Federal specification Nos. KKK-T-2107, 2108, 2109, 2110, 2111, and Federal specification No. KKK-B-1579.
( b ) Requirements not covered by Federal standards 122, 292, 307, or 794 shall conform with the provisions of § 101-26.501-4.
[57 FR 47777, Oct. 20, 1992]
§ 102-75.190 What amount must the transferee agency pay for the transfer of excess real property? The transferee agency must pay an amount equal to the property's fair market value (determined by the Administrator)— ( a ) Where the transferor agency has requested the net proceeds of the transfer pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 574; or
( b ) Where either the transferor or transferee agency (or organizational unit affected) is subject to the Government Corporation Control Act (31 U.S.C. 841), is a mixed-ownership Government corporation, or the municipal government of the District of Columbia.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT NO. 99: CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR"
PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
   
Written or oral statements made by Alcan or its representatives, including
statements set forth in Alcan's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999,
which describe the Company's or management's objectives, projections, estimates,
expectations or predictions of the future may be "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such
as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "estimates," "anticipates" or
the negative thereof or other variations thereon. The Company cautions that, by
their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty and that
the Company's actual results could differ materially from those expressed or
implied in such forward-looking statements or could affect the extent to which a
particular projection is realized.
    
Important factors which could cause the Company's actual performance to differ
materially from projections or expectations included in forward-looking
statements include global aluminum supply and demand conditions, aluminum ingot
prices and changes in other raw materials costs and availability, cyclical
demand and pricing within the principal markets for the Company's products,
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting environmental,
health or safety compliance, economic developments and other factors within the
countries in which the Company operates or sells its products and other factors
relating to the Company's ongoing operations including, but not limited to,
litigation, labour negotiations and fiscal regimes.

Copies of the Company's filings may be obtained by contacting the Company or
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                       19
<PAGE>










                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of Impax
Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth
below, hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.






                                           /s/ Barry R. Edwards
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                               Barry R. Edwards
                                           Chief Executive Officer



                                             March 12, 2004
                                  ---------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cv-61857-ALTMAN/Hunt

DONOVAN CHRISTIE, 

Plaintiff,

v.

ADTALEN GLOBAL

EDUCATION, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice [ECF No. 34] in accordance 

with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Being fully advised, we hereby ORDER and

ADJUDGE that this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own fees and 

costs. This case shall remain CLOSED. All pending deadlines and hearings are TERMINATED, 

and any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on July 17, 2023.

 _________________________________

 ROY K. ALTMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:22-cv-61857-RKA Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2023 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-4075

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TIMMY GOINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge;

Pamela Meade Sargent, Magistrate Judge. (M-01-14-2, M-01-15-2, M01-16-2, M-01-43-2, M-01-44-2, CR-02-5)

Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew W. Greene, SMITH & GREENE, P.L.L.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for

Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, S. Randall

Ramseyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Timmy Goins appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his

motion for modification of his sentence to permit his sentences to

run concurrently. We have reviewed the record, the magistrate

judge’s order, and the district court’s order affirming the

magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge and the district

court. See United States v. Goins, Nos. M-01-14-2; M-01-15-2; M-01-

16-2; M-01-43-2; M-01-44-2; CR-02-5 (W.D. Va. Dec. 18 & 26, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
{"agency":"CNCS","generated":"2020-08-03 11:27:26","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2020"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"8"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"8"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CNCS"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["13"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["9"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2020","quarter":"Q2"}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

NOTICE OF FILING LETTER

Plaintiffs, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby file the attached letter dated January 

30, 2023 from David Boies to the Honorable Judge K. Michael Moore. 

Respectfully submitted,

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

100 SE 2nd Street, Suite 2800

Miami, Florida 33150

By: /s/ Stephen N. Zack 

Tel.: (305) 539-8400

Fax: (305) 539-1307

tulrich@bsfllp.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2023 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 30, 2023, I authorized the electronic filing of the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of 

such filing to the e-mail addresses to all counsel of record. 

By: /s/ Stephen N. Zack 

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 102-37.280 How may a SASP use service charge funds? Funds accumulated from service charges may be deposited, invested, or used in accordance with State law to: ( a ) Cover direct and reasonable indirect costs of operating the SASP;
( b ) Purchase necessary equipment for the SASP;
( c ) Maintain a reasonable working capital reserve;
( d ) Rehabilitate surplus property, including the purchase of replacement parts;
( e ) Acquire or improve office or distribution center facilities; or
( f ) Pay for the costs of internal and external audits.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Philip
M. McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.




Date:
December 13, 2010





By:
              /s/ PHILIP M. MCDERMOTTName:
      Philip M. McDermottTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer
#### § 109-50.201 Applicability.

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to DOE offices and designated contractors.
#### § 109-28.5006 Utilization.

It is DOE policy that, where practicable and consistent with program needs, EHFFP be considered as a source of supply to avoid or postpone acquisition.
#### § 109-40.104 Use of Government-owned transportation equipment.

The preferred method of transporting property for the Government is through use of the facilities and services of commercial carriers. However, Government vehicles may be used when they are available to meet emergencies and accomplish program objectives which cannot be attained through use of commercial carriers.
Module 1: Overview of 
Performance Measurement
§ 3040.180 Material changes to product descriptions. ( a ) Whenever the Postal Service proposes material changes to a product description in the Mail Classification Schedule, no later than 30 days prior to implementing the proposed changes, it shall submit to the Commission a request to change the product description in the Mail Classification Schedule.
( b ) The request shall: ( 1 ) Include a copy of the applicable sections of the Mail Classification Schedule and the proposed changes therein in legislative format; and
( 2 ) Provide all supporting justification for the changes upon which the Postal Service proposes to rely.
[80 FR 35575, June 22, 2015. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
2022 AmeriCorps Seniors FGP Replacement Opportunity Appendix A - List of Geographic Service Areas

State Affect Areas

Arkansas Arkansas County

Arkansas Baxter County

Arkansas Benton County 

Arkansas Boone County

Arkansas Calhoun County

Arkansas Carroll County

Arkansas Cleveland County

Arkansas Columbia County

Arkansas Conway County

Arkansas Faulkner County

Arkansas Grant County

Arkansas Hempstead County

Arkansas Jefferson County

Arkansas Lafayette County

Arkansas Lincoln County

Arkansas Lonoke County 

Arkansas Madison County

Arkansas Marion County

Arkansas Miller County

Arkansas Monroe County

Arkansas Nevada County

Arkansas Newton County

Arkansas Ouachita County

Arkansas Perry County

Arkansas Phillips County

Arkansas Pike County

Arkansas Prairie County

Arkansas Pulaski County

Arkansas Saline County

Arkansas Searcy County

Arkansas Union County

Arkansas Washington County 

Arkansas Yell County

California San Mateo County

Florida Putnam County

Nebraska Burt County

Nebraska Omaha Reservation

Nebraska Thurston County

Oklahoma Bryan County

Oklahoma Carter County

Oklahoma Chickasaw Nation

Oklahoma Coal County

Oklahoma Garvin County

Oklahoma Grady County

Oklahoma Jefferson County

Update 11/4/21- Added Arkansas Counties. 
Oklahoma Johnston County

Oklahoma Love County

Oklahoma Marshall County

Oklahoma McClain County

Oklahoma Murray County

Oklahoma Pontotoc County

Oklahoma Stephens County

Pennsylvania Luzerne County

Pennsylvania Wyoming County

Puerto Rico Arroyo County

Puerto Rico Cayey County

Puerto Rico Guayama County

Puerto Rico Patillas County

Puerto Rico Salinas County

Puerto Rico Santa Isabel County

South Dakota Oglala Lakota County

South Dakota Pine Ridge Sioux Indian Reservation
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463. as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental Systems (1189).                    

*Date and time:*                         July 25-26, 2000; 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Room 380, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         A. Frederick Thompson, Program Director, Division of Bioengineering and Environmental Systems, National Science Foundation; 4201 Wilson Boulevard; Arlington, Virginia 22230; Telephone: (703) 306-1318.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate Environmental Technology Engineering “New Technologies for the Environment” proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5                               ( print page 38864)                            U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: June 19, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-15832 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in AML Communications, Inc.'s Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-82774 and 333-32488) and on Form S-8 (Nos
333-51256 and 333-68097) of our report, dated June 4, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AML Communications, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2004.

|/s/SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN, LLPSINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN,
LLP | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

Los
Angeles, California
June 29, 2004

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the "Company"),hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Date:10 May 2007                                                                    

                                                                                               /s/ Michael Hanley                                        

                                                                                               Michael Hanley

Executive VicePresident and 

Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Endocare, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William J. Nydam, President and
Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:
    
    December 2, 2003
    
    
    
    /s/ WILLIAM J.
NYDAM
William J. NydamPresident and Chief Operating Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

September 17, 2015

Hon. Thomas Kelley

Assistant District Attorney

801 W. Division

Orange, TX 77630

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Bryan Laine

1045 South Redwood

Kountze, TX 77625

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Stephen Carlton

Orange County Co urthouse

801 Division Street

Orange, TX 77630

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 14

- 00191

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. E105654

Style: Salma Monala

- Khalil v. The State of Texas

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date

.

Ver y truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: County Court at Law No. 2 (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

Hon. Karen Vance , Orange County Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

Hon. Olen Underwood , Presiding Judge, Second Admin i strative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)