alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 647 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 647

To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense 
  from being used for the deployment of United States Armed Forces in 
    Kosovo unless that deployment is specifically authorized by law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1999

Mr. Paul (for himself, Mrs. Chenoweth, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Hostettler, 
 Mr. Campbell, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Schaffer, Mr. Duncan, Mr. 
 Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Scarborough, Mr. Salmon, Mrs. Cubin, and 
 Mr. Metcalf) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense 
  from being used for the deployment of United States Armed Forces in 
    Kosovo unless that deployment is specifically authorized by law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF USE ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNDS FOR 
              DEPLOYMENT OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES IN KOSOVO.

    (a) In General.--None of the funds appropriated or otherwise 
available to the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for 
the deployment of United States Armed Forces in Kosovo.
    (b) Exception.--The prohibition against the deployment of United 
States Armed Forces in Kosovo in subsection (a) shall not apply if such 
deployment is specifically authorized by a law enacted after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### New Search

If you are not happy with the results below please do another search

#### 39 search results for: newsletter

## Brambles: Organic Production

Crops
Publication

…Vol. 16, No. 4. p. 400-412. Wechsler, Debby. 2008. 2008 raspberry/blackberry pricing survey. The Bramble: The **Newsletter** of the North American Raspberry & Blackberry Association, Inc. Vol. 23, No. 3….

## Specialty Cut Flower Production and Marketing

Crops
Publication

…plants, seeds, and supplies. Contact the ASCFG, listed under Organizations. Growing for Market, a **newsletter** for market gardeners, contains a monthly column on fieldgrown cut flower production and marketing. This…

## Dairy Goats: Sustainable Production

Livestock
Publication

…nutritious as pasture, and that the shade in the browse areas helped keep the does cooler, which also helped production. The full article was published in The Dairy Ruminant **Newsletter**…

## Apples: Organic Production Guide

Crops
Organic Farming
Publication

…mid-Atlantic region. Online **newsletter**s and publications archived. This is also the location to download the MaryBlyt program mentioned in the publication. Lost Nation Orchard Seasonal Checklist, by Michael Philips The…

## Small-Scale Livestock Production

Livestock
Publication

By Margo Hale, Linda Coffey, Terrell Spencer, and Andy Pressman, NCAT Agriculture Specialists Livestock offer many benefits to a small-scale farming operation. Photo credits: Goose – Margo Hale, NCAT; Goats…

## Community Supported Agriculture

Local Food Systems
Publication

…most common practices is a regular **newsletter** that explains what members can expect in the weekly share. Here are examples of other common inclusions in a CSA **newsletter**: Recipes tailored…

## Peaches: Organic and Low-Spray Production

Crops
Publication

…Farm” in the Winter ’97-’98 edition of California Certified Organic Farmers **newsletter**; it has been updated and revised per an online interview with Rosato by ATTRA in 2011.) If Carl…

## Blueberries: Organic Production

Crops
Publication

…offers sample budgets and budget worksheets. Massachusetts Berry Notes University of Massachusetts Amherst This website contains the back-issue archives of UMass Extension Fruit Program’s monthly Massachusetts Berry Notes **newsletter**. Midwest…

## Tips for Selling through CSAs — Community Supported Agriculture

Business and Marketing
Publication

…washing, sorting, packing, etc. Tips Build community through efforts such as harvest parties, work days, and **newsletter**s. Conduct annual surveys to get customer feedback on quality, variety and service. Consider…

## Cucumber Beetles: Organic and Biorational Integrated Pest Management

Pest Management
Publication

…cucumber beetles. Commercial Horticulture **Newsletter**, January–February 1998. Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech. Caldwell, J. S. and S. Stockton. 1998. Trap Cropping in Management of Cucumber Beetles. Commercial Horticulture **Newsletter**, Virginia…

2
3
4
#### § 109-43.307-2.50 Monitoring of hazardous personal property.

To provide assurance that hazardous personal property is not being inadvertently released from the site by transfer or sale to the public, all hazardous or suspected hazardous personal property shall be checked for contamination by environmental, safety, and health officials. Contamination-free personal property will be tagged with a certification tag authorizing release for transfer or sale. Contaminated personal property will be referred back to the program office for appropriate action.
C.J.

Pickering writ of habeas corpus. 2 

### See NRS 34.810(2)). Therefore, appellant's motion was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. 

### See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(3).

Even if appellant could demonstrate cause for the delay, he cannot demonstrate undue prejudice because his underlying claim—that the State never produced an arrest warrant—did not render his guilty plea invalid and did not entitle him to relief. We therefore conclude that the motion was procedurally barred, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Eric William Zessman Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 

### Zessman v. State, Docket No. 42099 (Order of Affirmance, June 4, 2004); 

### Zessman v. State, Docket No. 44453 (Order of Affirmance, June 15, 2005).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A (exp
§ 102-73.300 Are Federal agencies required to pay for litigation expenses incurred by a property owner because of a condemnation proceeding? Federal agencies must pay reasonable expenses for attorneys, appraisals, and engineering fees that a property owner incurs because of a condemnation proceeding, if any of the following are true: ( a ) The court's final judgment is that the Federal agency cannot acquire the real property by condemnation.
( b ) The Federal agency abandons the condemnation proceeding other than under an agreed-on settlement.
( c ) The court renders a judgment in the property owner's favor in an inverse condemnation proceeding or the Federal agency agrees to settle such proceeding.
EXHIBIT 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|March 31, 2008 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                                     
|-------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|               | Marc N. Teal                                         
|               | (Principal Financial Officer), BCTC IV Assignor Corp.
|               |
#### § 102-117.15 To whom does this part apply?

This part applies to all agencies and wholly-owned Government corporations as defined in 5 U.S.C. 101, *et seq.* and 31 U.S.C. 9101(3), except as otherwise expressly provided.

[79 FR 33476, June 11, 2014]
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 609

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 3, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and

Urban Affairs

AN ACT

To amend the Export Apple and Pear Act to limit the

applicability of the Act to apples.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 609 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SCOPE OF EXPORT APPLE AND PEAR ACT.

2 (a) SHORT TITLE.—The Act of June 10, 1933 (7

3 U.S.C. 581 et seq.; commonly known as the Export Apple

4 and Pear Act), is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new section:

6 ‘‘SEC. 11. This Act may be cited as the ‘Export Apple

7 Act’.’’.

8 (b) DEFINITION OF APPLES.—Section 9 of such Act

9 (7 U.S.C. 589) is amended by striking paragraph (4) and

10 inserting the following new paragraph:

11 ‘‘(4) The term ‘apples’ means fresh whole apples,

12 whether or not the apples have been in storage.’’.

13 (c) ELIMINATION OF REFERENCES TO PEARS.—Such

14 Act is further amended—

15 (1) by striking ‘‘and/or pears’’ each place it ap16 pears in the first section and sections 5 and 6; and

17 (2) by striking ‘‘or pears’’ each place it appears

18 in the first section and sections 2, 3, and 4.

Passed the House of Representatives March 2,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
091P14-3

#### State v. Salim Abdu Gould

1. Defs *Pro Se*Motion of Leave to Pile Individual *Writ of Certiorari*

1. Dismissed

2. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

2. Allowed
```

EXHIBIT 10.24

Promotion Connections, Inc.
517 Cashmere Terrace
Los Angeles, CA 90049
310-472-1193

Jay Slater

November 16, 2001

Mr. Rick Licht
Ultimate Sports Inc.
2444 Wilshire Blvd.
Santa Monica, CA 90403

Dear Rick

Per my conversation with you and Martin, the following shall constitute an
agreement describing the working relationship between Promotion Connections,
Inc. and Ultimate Sports Entertainment, Inc.

Promotion Connections will act in concert with Ultimate Sports to strategize,
contact, present and sell in promotion programs utilizing Ultimate products
and resources.  Promotion Connection will make available to Ultimate Sports
its contacts and relationships in order to broaden the reach of Ultimate
Sports products.

As compensation, Ultimate Sports will pay the following:

Monthly Retainer:  $5,000

Commission 7.5% on first $1,000,000 in sales 8.5% thereafter

Stock Options  50,000 shares annually (current option at $.125 each)

Travel Expenses:  pre-approved airfare, hotel, transportation etc.

Other Expenses:  Presentation materials, long distance and cell phone mailing
expenses, fully documented and billed monthly

Term:  12 months, commencing November 15, 2001, with review after 8 months,
after which either party may terminate this agreement with 30 days notice.

If the above accurately represents our agreement, please sign below and return
a copy to me.  If any of this is inaccurate, please get in touch with me asap
and we'll get it fixed.
I truly look forward to a long and profitable relationship with you and Martin
and the Ultimate Sports Force.  I appreciate your confidence in bringing me on
board.

Best Regards,

/s/ Jay Slater
Jay Slater

Acknowledged and agreed:

By /s/ Rick Licht______________
Rick Licht
Ultimate Sports Entertainment, Inc.

Cc  Martin Burke
```
Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Ave, SW. Renton, Washington 98057-3356

February 22, 2011

Mr. Baruch Marom Gulfstream Aerospace LP c/o IAI Dept. 4199 70100, Israel

Dear Mr. Marom:

We have received your petition, GALP Re f #FAA/11033/CG, dated January 29, 2011. In that letter, you requested an exemption from the requirements of § 25.813(e) of Title 14 of Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) for th e Gulfstream Model G250 airplane that is currently being evaluated for FAA type certif ication. The exemption, if granted, would allow installation of a forward compartmen t door between passenger seats and emergency

exits.

Your request, which you sent to the Depart ment of Transportation’s Federal Document Management System, Docket No. FAA-2011-0113, will be processed by this office. We have determined that any gran t of exemption in this case would not set a precedent. Therefore, we are waiving the requirement for Federal Register publication and the public comment period. Although we have waived the publication and comment period, you should not interpret this action as approval of your request. We will issue an decision after we have thoroughly analyzed your request.

If you have any questions or concerns regardi ng your petition or the petition process, please contact Dan Jacquet, (425) 227-2676, daniel.jacquet@faa.gov

.

/s/

Maria G. Delgado Transport Standards Staff Transport Airplane Directorate

Aircraft Certification Service
#### § 102-37.305 May a SASP act as GSA's agent in selling undistributed surplus property (either as usable property or scrap)?

Yes, you may act as GSA's agent in selling undistributed surplus property (either as usable property or scrap) if an established cooperative agreement with GSA permits such an action. You must notify GSA each time you propose to conduct a sale under the cooperative agreement. You may request approval to conduct a sale when reporting the property to GSA for disposal instructions. If no formal agreement exists, you may submit such an agreement at that time for approval.
Case 0:22-cv-62078-JEM   Document 16   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/26/2023   Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Randy Lubinsky, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of PainCare Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 16, 2005



|/s/ Randy Lubinsky                     
|---------------------------------------
|Randy Lubinsky, Chief Executive Officer
PROMISSORY NOTE


$37,500.00

For Value Received, Sharp Technology, Inc. (maker), promises to pay to the order
of  Gilbert  Gertner (Payee), at 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2222, Houston, Texas
77056,  or  such  other address as may be designated by the beholder hereof, the
principle  sum  of  Thirty  Seven  Thousand  Five  Hundred  Dollars ($37,500.00)
together  with the interest at the rate of 10% Per annum.  Payment shall be made
in  one  year  and  is  callable  by the issuer at any time.  Maker reserves the
privilege  to  pay all or part of the indebtedness evidenced by this note at any
time  without  premium  or  premium  or  penalty.


This  note  is  collateralized  by  the  equity in the account receivable of the
maker,  including  but  not  limited  to,  accounts  receivable  from U.S. West.

Whenever  used  herein, the words "maker" and "payee" shall be deemed to include
their  respective  heirs,  personal  representatives,  successors  and  assigns.

The  maker  hereof  and  all parties who at the time may be liable hereon in any
capacity,  jointly  and  severally,  waive  presentment for payment, protest and
notice  of  dishonor  of  this  note.

This  note  is  executed  and  delivered  and  payable in the State of Texas and
construed  in  accordance  with  the  Laws  of  the  State  of  Texas.


Sharp  Technology,  Inc.

/s/  George  Sharp
-----------------------------
George T. Sharp, President
Date:  June 28, 2000

                                     - 77 -
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMREP Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  September 13, 2012






/s/ Theodore J. Gaasche


Theodore J. Gaasche


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)






/s/ Peter M. Pizza


Peter M. Pizza


Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>
                      [PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LETTERHEAD]



December 22, 2004



Consent of Independent Auditors


We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of CanWest
Global Communications Corp. of our report dated November 10, 2004, except for
note 24 which is as of November 18, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of CanWest Global Communications Corp. as of August 31, 2004 and 2003
and for the years ended August 31, 2004 and 2003.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Chartered Accountants




PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each
of which is a separate and independent legal entity.