alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  AMREP   Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  July 31,  2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
the  undersigned  does hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  September 13, 2005

                                                    /s/ Peter M. Pizza
                                                    ------------------
                                                    Peter M. Pizza
                                                    Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                                    /s/ James Wall
                                                    --------------
                                                    James Wall*

                                                    /s/ Michael P. Duloc
                                                    --------------------
                                                    Michael P. Duloc*


-----------

*The  registrant  is a  holding  company  which  does  substantially  all of its
business through two wholly-owned  subsidiaries (and their subsidiaries).  Those
wholly-owned  subsidiaries  are AMREP  Southwest  Inc.  ("ASW")  and Kable Media
Services, Inc. ("Kable").  James Wall is the principal executive officer of ASW,
and Michael P. Duloc is the principal executive officer of Kable. The registrant
has no chief  executive  officer.  Its  executive  officers  include James Wall,
Senior Vice  President and Peter M. Pizza,  Vice  President and Chief  Financial
Officer,  and Michael P. Duloc, who may be deemed an executive officer by reason
of his position with Kable.
OFFI& OF THE 

AUSTIN 

Hon. Stanley Tlmlns, County 

Harrieon County 

Ilarshall, Texas 

DearS3.r 

5nl.on as to 

whether the has author- 

. 

6 $tiolh$9&+de that whsnev8r the ,on table stall equire the servioes 

horlzing suoh an appolntompsnsation and ahall deterdeputies to be appoint&.. 

Artiole 6879a provides the condeputy shall make .a written 

for such deputy and giving 

the nam of eaoh propooed appointee. A Commlssloners* Court shall thereupon determbm 

whether there is a need for suoh deputy or 

deputies. 
.: 

- t. 

Eon. Stanley Timmins,,February ll, 1339, Page Z’ 

We oonstrue these artloles to be 

oumuhtlve and by Artiole 39OS the Oommlssior&s’ Court h&d no right to do anythinp; 

exoept authorize an appointment and by Article 6S79a the Cmmlssloners* Court 1s granted the authority to oonflrm or rejeot the 

appOiAtIIL8nt ir A0 AQO8SSity 8XiStB. 

Tie are Of the 0piAi0n that the 

‘Comisslonersl Court oannot refuse to authorize or oonrim the appointment or a deputy 

oonstable for personal reasons and that the 

only question for the Court to deolde;is 

the neoeesity for a deputy. 

Vie are 0r the opinion ii there is 

a A8080Sity rOF the BDpOiAtULeAt Or 0. deputy 

and the COUim&3SiOAerS’.CoU% has arbltrarlly 

refueed to authorize or confirm the appolntment of a deputy oonstoble, that the remedy 

is for the oonstable and his appointee to - 

bring a mandamus suit to compel authorization 

and oonflrmatlon. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNgYGENERnLOFTEUS
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF OFFICERS
OF AML COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 1350

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officers of AML Communications, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



Dated:
June 30, 2008

/s/JACOB INBAR

---

Jacob Inbar, Chief Executive Officer

/s/HEERA LEE

---

Heera Lee, Director of Finance
Principal Accounting Officer

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SPINTEK
GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        60
<INVENTORY>                                        483
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1078
<PP&E>                                             169
<DEPRECIATION>                                      38
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1081
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             4825
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3484)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2457
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3152
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 534
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3571)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3571)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 15

- 00091

- CV

NUEVA GENERACION MUS IC GROUP, INC. , Appellant

V.

ISIDRO CHAVEZ ESPINO ZA, P/K/A ESPINOZA P AZ , Appellee
Appeal from the 281st District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2015

- 00749 ).

This case is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on January 26, 2015. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s order contains n o reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s order.

The Court orders that the appellant, Nueva Generacion Music Group, Inc., pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered July 30, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Huddle, and Lloyd. Opinion delivered by Justice Keyes.
§ 105-54.309 Added responsibilities of service and staff office heads and regional administrators. ( a ) No later than the first meeting of an advisory committee, submit to committee members, committee staff, consultants, and appropriate agency management personnel a written statement of the purpose, objectives, and expected accomplishments of the committee;
( b ) Solicit in writing or in a formal meeting at least annually the views of committee members on the effectiveness, activities, and management of the committee, including recommendations for improvement. Review comments to determine whether improvements or corrective action is warranted. Retain recommendations until the committee is terminated or renewed.
( c ) Involve key management personnel of the agency whose interests are affected by the committee in committee meetings, including reviewing reports and establishing agendas.
( d ) Periodically, but not less than annually, review the level of committee staff suport to make sure that expenditures are justified by committee activity and benefit to the Government.
( e ) Monitor the attendance and participation of committee members and consider replacing any member who misses a substantial number of scheduled meetings.
( f ) Establish meeting dates and distribute agendas and other materials well in advance.
''-iOFiFASi^p^ 

W 

October 15, 2009 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sir or Madam -

Attached is a copy of an exemption request for 14 CFR 120 in accordance with the 

requirements prescribed in 14 CFR 11.61-11.101. 

Please contact me if there are any questions or problems with regards to handling this 

request on the Docket Management System. 

Thanks very much. 

Christopher J. Siderwicz 

President, The Mills Air Service, Inc. 

1000 Race Lane 

Marstons Mills, MA 02648 

radials@comcast.net 

office: 508-428-8732 

ceH: 508-360-6181 
Petition for Exemption 

The Mills Air Service, Inc. 

Christopher J. Siderwicz, President 

(a) Company Indentiflcation 

Company Name: The Mills Air Service, Inc. 

Company Address: 1000 Race Lane, Marstons Mills, MA 02648 

Telephone: 508-428-8732 (office) or 508-360-6181 (cell 

email: radials@comca8t.net 

(b) Exemption is requested within 14 CFR Part 120, Dnjg & Alcohol Testing 

Specifically, identical but separate entries in the table in Section 120.117 specify that an 

FAA approved drug testing program must be implemented for Part 135 and Pa^t 91.127 

operations. Our family company which only has 2 employees -myself and my son- have 

implemented an FAA approved program for our part 91.147 operation and the FAA 

provided us with an Antidrug and Alcohol Misuse Prevention Program Operations 

Specification (OpSpec) as part of the process to approve our Part 135 operation. The 

approval for this OpSpec A449 was signed by our FAA Principal Operations Inspector on 

10/24/08. While it is typical that part 91 and 135 operations in most companies are 

handled by separate personnel, that is not the case in our small fimi. 

(c)Reiief: The relief we seek is acceptance of our existing program for both above 

operations, in order to avoid redundant effort and expense. 

(d) Public Interest: Reducing our cost helps us maintain the lowest possible rates for 

our services, as well as minimizes the effort that the FAA must expend managing our 

drug and alcohol program. Both are in the public interest. 

(e) Safety: The existing program, approved for 91.147 passenger flights, is both 

adequate and appropriate for our Part 135 freight (non-passenger) operation. 

(f) Federal Register Summary: Request to allow existing FAA approved Drug Testing 

Program to be used for both Part 135 and Part 91.147 operations for a family company 

with only 2 employees. 

(g)8unmiary: Our small family company has been in operation for 5 years with no 

accidents or drug/alcohol issues. 

(h) Outoide the US: We would like the exemption for Part 135 to apply to potential 

freight operations in the Canibean.
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146 

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844 

www.fairlawattorney.com 

DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF CONSENT TO JOIN 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746, I hereby make the following declaration: 

1. I am over 18 years of age and am capable of making this declaration. This declaration 

is made on my own personal knowledge. 

2. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §216(b), I consent to serve as a plaintiff in the above-referenced 

FLSA action. 

3. I was employed by <<Custom709>>, from approximately <<Custom534>> to 

<<Custom535>>. 

4. I was not paid at least a minimum wage and/or overtime wages for all the time that I 

worked. 

5. I agree to be bound by any decision in this case. 

Signed: _______________________

Printed Name: <<LEAD NAME>> 

Dated: ________________________ 08 / 15 / 2023

Doc ID: 60bf5dbb4a562adb4d3d3ab179949efdc023c369

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 189-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 1 of 3
 135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146 

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844 

www.fairlawattorney.com 

DECLARACIÓN Y AVISO 

De conformidad con 28 USC § 1746, por la presente hacer la siguiente declaración: 

1. Soy mayor de 18 años de edad y soy capaz que hacer esta declaracion. Esta declaracion 

es basada en mis conocimientos personales. 

2. De conformidad con 29 U.S.C. §216(b), doy mi consentiemiento para ejercer como 

demandante en esta accion bajo FLSA. 

3. Estuve empleado por <<Custom709>> desde aproximadamente <<Custom534>>

hasta <<Custom535>>. 

4. No se pagó por lo menos un salario mínimo y/o pago de horas extras para todo el

tiempo que trabajé. 

5. Estoy de acuerdo con estar vinculado a cualquier decisión en este caso. 

Firma: _______________________

Nombre: <<LEAD NAME>> 

Fecha: ________________________

Doc ID: 60bf5dbb4a562adb4d3d3ab179949efdc023c369

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 189-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 2 of 3
Consent to Join in Spanish

37.pdf

60bf5dbb4a562adb4d3d3ab179949efdc023c369

MM / DD / YYYY

Signed

This document was signed on fairlawattorney.lawruler.com

08 / 15 / 2023

15:01:00 UTC

Sent for signature to Alexander Martinez

(chivitos75@gmail.com) from esign@lawruler.com

IP: 40.121.15.83

08 / 15 / 2023

17:45:50 UTC

Viewed by Alexander Martinez (chivitos75@gmail.com)

IP: 172.58.135.103

08 / 15 / 2023

17:46:33 UTC

Signed by Alexander Martinez (chivitos75@gmail.com)

IP: 172.58.135.103

08 / 15 / 2023 The document has been completed.

17:46:33 UTC

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 189-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 3 of 3
§ 3050.25 Volume and revenue data. ( a ) The items in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section shall be provided.
( b ) The Revenue, Pieces, and Weight (RPW) report, including estimates by shape, weight, and indicia, and the underlying billing determinants, broken out by quarter, within 90 days of the close of each fiscal year;
( c ) Revenue, pieces, and weight by rate category and special service by quarter, within 40 days of the close of Quarters 1, 2, and 3 of the fiscal year and 60 days after Quarter 4, but no later than the filing of reports filed pursuant to section 3050.40(a) or 3050.40(b);
( d ) Quarterly Statistics Report, including estimates by shape, weight, and indicia, within 40 days of the close of Quarters 1, 2, and 3 of the fiscal year and 60 days after Quarter 4 but no later than the filing of reports filed pursuant to section 3050.40(a) or 3050.40(b); and
( e ) Billing determinants within 60 days of the close of Quarters 1, 2, and 3 of the fiscal year and 90 days after Quarter 4.
[74 FR 20850, May 5, 2009, as amended at 83 FR 49293, Oct. 1, 2018]
### BOEM Seeks Public Involvement in Preparing an Environmental Assessment for the Shell Gulf of
Mexico Inc. Revised Outer Continental Shelf Leas e Sale Exploration Plan, Chukchi Sea, Alaska

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) for a revised Exploration Plan (EP) submitted by Shell Gulf of Mexico, Inc. for shallow water exploratory drilling in the Chukchi Sea. The BOEM is inviting the public to co mment on issues that should be considered by BOEM in preparing the EA.

The BOEM announced that Shell's EP was “deemed submitted” on November 16, 2011. In accordance with the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, the BOEM has 30 calenda r days to approve the plan, require modifications, or disapprove the plan. The EP proposes drilling six explorator y wells in water depths of approximately 130-160 feet (40-50 m), each located in the Chukchi Sea more than 64 miles (103 km) from the coast of northwestern Alaska. The EP describes all proposed exploration activities, in cluding the timing of these activities, information concerning drilling vessels, the location of each planned well, and other relevant information that is needed to meet important safety standards. The EP is availabl e for review at: http://www.boem.gov/shellchukchi2012.

As part of BOEM’s review, BOEM will prepare an EA sp ecific to the proposed exploration activities. The 30-day period includes a 10-day public comment period to allow the public an opportunity to provide comments on issues that should be considered by BOEM in preparing the EA.

BOEM will only accept and consider comments which are submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal (http://www.regulations.gov). The deadline to receive these comments is November 26, 2011. BOEM cautions that before including your address, phone number, e-mail a ddress, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire co mment, including your personal identifying information, may be made publically available at any time. While you may ask BOEM (prominently at the beginning of your submission) to withhold your personal identifying info rmation from public view, BOEM cannot guarantee that it
will be able to do so. BOEM will not consider anonymous comments.
C.E.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 1, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


/s/ Michael A. Richardson
-----------------------------------------
Michael A. Richardson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  April 14, 2003


<PAGE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 67

To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 to extend

the loan guarantee program for Indian housing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. BEREUTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Housing and Community Development Act

of 1992 to extend the loan guarantee program for Indian

housing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian Housing Loan

5 Guarantee Extension Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. LOAN GUARANTEES FOR INDIAN HOUSING.

7 Section 184(i) of the Housing and Community Devel8 opment Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 1715z–13a(i)) is

9 amended—
2

•HR 67 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (5), by striking subparagraph

2 (C) and inserting the following new subparagraph:

3 ‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON OUTSTANDING AG4 GREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT.—Subject to the

5 limitations in subparagraphs (A) and (B), the

6 Secretary may enter into commitments to guar7 antee loans under this section in each fiscal

8 year with an aggregate outstanding principal

9 amount not exceeding such amount as may be

10 provided in appropriation Acts for such fiscal

11 year.’’; and

12 (2) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘each of fiscal

13 years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001’’ and in14 serting ‘‘each fiscal year’’.

Æ
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-3737

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Adrian Lacey lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Delta

____________ Submitted: May 12, 2022 Filed: May 20, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Adrian Lacey, who was counseled below but is now proceeding pro se, appeals after he pleaded guilty to possessing a prohibited object in prison, and the districtcourt 1 sentenced him to 6 months in prison. On appeal, Lacey argues that his right

to a speedy trial was violated, his guilty plea was involuntary, and his counsel was ineffective. Upon careful review, we conclude that Lacey waived any speedy trial claim by pleading guilty. See United States v. Cox, 985 F.2d 427, 433 (8th Cir. 1993) (claim that indictment should have been dismissed for violation of the Speedy Trial Act was waived by guilty plea); Speed v. United States, 518 F.2d 75, 76 (8th Cir. 1975) (“it is well settled that a plea of guilty waives any claim to denial of a speedy trial”). Further, the hearing transcript shows that he knowingly and voluntarily entered his guilty plea, despite his later filings asserting that he was innocent. See United States v. Green, 521 F.3d 929, 931 (8th Cir. 2008) (whether a plea was knowing and voluntary is reviewed de novo); Nguyen v. United States, 114 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir. 1997) (defendant’s representations during plea-taking carry strong presumption of verity). Finally, we decline to address Lacey’s ineffective-assistance claim in this direct appeal. See United States v. Hernandez, 281 F.3d 746, 749 (8th Cir. 2002) (generally, ineffective-assistance claim is not cognizable on direct appeal). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

1 The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Quebecor World Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeremy Roberts, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002, that:

 

(1)                The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Jeremy  Roberts            |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | Jeremy  Roberts                |
|   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|   |                           |
|   | Dated:  December 15, 2008 |

 

----
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Kenneth C. Griffin, Plaintiff,

v.

Internal Revenue Service and U.S. 

Department of the Treasury, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 22-24023-Civ-Scola

Order of Dismissal

The parties have dismissed this suit with prejudice in accordance with 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Joint Stip. for Dismissal, ECF No. 

174.) The Court directs the Clerk to close this case. All pending motions, if 

any, are denied as moot. 

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on June 25, 2024.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 176 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2024 Page 1 of 1