alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Walter S. Berman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


/s/ Walter S. Berman
------------------------------
Name:  Walter S. Berman
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  May 15, 2003
1

IN THE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT

COURT,IN AND FOR

TheSOUTHERN DISTRICT COUNTY,

FLORIDA

CASE NO:1:22-cv-23871-JEM

DIVISION:CivilAction

FJLED Bf

Plaintiff D.C.

14y gg gjgj

s4odeIv-x-id-,sr-c ' îlLvv-.,çstvLj.

o.opfa..vjlyi

VS.

M odel-M e-luds,Inc.

Defendant

M OTION TO ENLARGE TIM E TO FILE RESPONSE

Defendant,ShushonaCooper,askstheCourtto extendhis/her/theirtim etofilea

responsetothePlaintiffs'Complaintintheabove-stylem atter.Defendantissreking

legalassistanceconcerningthijmatter,butduetotim elimitations,Defendanthas/have

notbeen giventheopportunitytoadequatelyconsultwithanattom ey,andforthisreason

requeststheextensionoftim etorespond.

W HEREFORE,DefendantM odel-M e-M ds,lnc.c/o ShushonaCooper,requeststhatthis

Courtenlargethetim efortilinghim/her/theirresponse.

CERTIFICATE OF SERW CE

:

Theundersignedcertifiesthatatruecopyofthisdocum enthasbeenm ailedto

JamesSlater,Esq.,AtonwyforPlaintiftl113S.M onroeStreet,Tallahassee,Florida32301,this

dateJanuary 17th 2023 > *

Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Defendant

M odel-M e-M ds,Inc.c/oShushonaCooper

17801N W 2ndave. #211

M iam iGardens,Fl.orida,33169

Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2023 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS






|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
    ended September 30, 2005 (the Periodic Report)
    which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
|  
|2. | Information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
    all material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of AT&T Corp.                                                                                                                                 



| |                     
| | --------------------
| | /s/ Thomas W. Horton
| |                     
| | Thomas W. Horton
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

PLAINTIFF(S) 

v.

ARBITRADE LTD., et al.,

DEFENDANT(S). 

CASE NUMBER

 1:22−cv−23171−BB

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

Clerk's Default

 It appearing that the defendant(s) herein, is/are in default for failure to appear, answer, or otherwise plead

to the complaint filed herein within the time required by law.

Default is hereby entered against defendant(s)

MAX W. BARBER

as of course, on the date March 10, 2023.

Angela E. Noble

CLERK OF COURT

By /s/ Dimas Rodriguez

Deputy Clerk

cc: Judge Beth Bloom

 Securities and Exchange Commission

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

CV−37 (10/01)

Case 1:22-cv-23171-BB Document 68 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 1 of 1
p. 1 

F? I~- '' f/a - 4 f'ivJ = ~2 oOS - 6,0 ,3Z 

Dawn Kominski 

<dkominski@tkinet .com> 

05/1212008 04:39 PM 

To Catherine RomanlDC/USEPA/US@EPA 

cc 

bcc 

Subject FW: Importation of Acetyl Chloride 

I hope this is what you were looking for . 

Dawn . 

-----Original Message-----

From : Dawn Kominski 

Sent : Friday, March 23, 2007 10 :24 AM 

To : 'Roman .Catherine@epamail .epa .gov' 

Cc : Schweer .Greg@epamail .epa .gov; Ken Gagon 

Subject : RE : Importation of Acetyl Chloride 

. 

r-~ 

C 

Yes, the last importation of acetyl chloride was in 2002 . I asked our import 

person if she knows of anyone else who imports or manufactures acetyl 

chloride . She did not . Typically we would have more information on other 

companies in our business areas, but we imported the acetyl chloride for our 

parent company and therefore were not involved in the sales, marketing, etc . 

of the material . 

If you have any additional questions let me know . 

Thanks . 

Dawn Kominski 

602-889-8401 

-----Original Message----- 

From : Roman .Catherine@epamail .epa .gov [mailto :Roman .Catherine@epamail 

Sent : Monday, March 19, 2007 11 :41 AM 

To : Dawn Kominski 

Cc : Schweer.Greg@epamail .epa .gov c.tt 

Subject: Importation of Acetyl Chloride 

On December 5, 2006, I phoned you concerning the importation by 

Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc . of acetyl chloride (CAS No . 75-36-5), which is 

a chemical on the TSCA section 4 test rule entitled "Testing of Certain 

High Production Volume Chemicals" (71 FR 13708, March 16, 2006) . The 

purpose of my call was to determine if your company has manufactured 

(including imported ) the chemical since the 2002 IUR reporting period . 

Your response to my questions conveyed the following : 

Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. last imported acetyl chloride in 2002 . 

Please confirm that what was conveyed to me in your response is 

accurate . If it is not accurate, please provide a correction . 

Also, is your company aware of any other companies that manufacture 

(including import) acetyl chloride . I would appreciate receiving your 

response in a "reply with history" e-mail to me 

(roman .catherine@epa .gov) . 

Catherine Roman 

CONTAINS NO CBl 

3 
USEPA 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave ., NW, 7405M 

Washington, DC 20460 

(202) 564-8172 

(202) 564-4765 (Fax)
#### § 102-42.155 Can foreign gifts or decorations be destroyed?

Yes, foreign gifts or decorations that are not sold under this part may be destroyed and disposed of as scrap or for their material content under part 102-38 of this subchapter B.

[65 FR 45539, July 24, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 28778, May 18, 2006]
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Washington, D.C. 20460

 

OFFICE OF PREVENTION, 

PESTICIDES AND TOXIC 

SUBSTANCES

PC Code: 123802

DP Codes: 403954

October 22, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Fomesafen Drinking Water Assessment for a new IR-4 Use on Cantaloupe, 

Cucumber, Pea, Succulent pea, Pumpkin, Summer squash, Watermelon, Winter 

squash, and Succulent soybean (Edamame)

TO: Barbara Madden, Risk Manager

Laura Nollen, Risk Manager Reviewer 

Registration Division (7505P) 

 

FROM: He Zhong, Ph.D., Biologist

Environmental Risk Branch I

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

 

APPROVED Ed Odenkirchen, Ph.D., Acting Branch Chief

BY: Sujatha Sankula, Ph.D., Lead Biologist 

Environmental Risk Branch I

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

Summary

This assessment provides estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWC) for fomefaen (trade 

name: Reflex® Herbicide) in both surface water and ground water in support of human health 

risk assessments for a new IR-4 use on cantaloupe, cucumber, pea, succulent pea, pumpkin, 

summer squash, watermelon, winter squash, and succulent soybean (Edamame). Based on the 

proposed supplemental label (EPA Reg. No. 100-993), a maximum of 1.5 pts/acre of the 

formulated product (0.375 lbs a.i./acre or 0.42 kg a.i./ha) may be applied annually preemergence 

and postemergence as broadcast application by aerial and ground spray in the EPA regions 1, 2,

3, 4 and 5. According to the preliminary data from Tier-II PRZM/EXAM modeling and EDWCs 

for the same application rate from the previous DW assessments for fomesafen on pepper, 
2

cotton, soybeans, dry beans, snap beans, potato and tomato (USEPA 2010, DP 373599, 373601 

and USEPA 2009, DP365204) at the PCA 0.87, the proposed EDWCs are not expected to 

supersede the previous upper bound EDWC values (USEPA 2005, DP 322213). Therefore, 

EFED continues to recommend the previous upper bound EDWC values for surface source 

drinking water concentrations of 34.8 μg/L for peak (acute), 13.1 μg/L for annual average (noncancer chronic), and 30-year annual average concentration of 6.5 μg/L (cancer chronic). EFED 

also recommends using the ground water monitoring concentration of 1 μg/L as the benchmark 

concentration for fomesafen in ground water source drinking water because it represents actual 

use conditions of fomesafen on soybeans on a vulnerable soil.

References

USEPA. 2005. Revised Tier II Drinking Water Assessment for Fomesafen use on cotton, 

Soybeans, Dry Bean, and Snap Beans. DP Barcodes: 322213. pp. 20.

USEPA. 2009. Drinking Water Assessment for Fomesafen use on cotton, soybeans, dry beans, 

snap beans, potato and tomato, DP Barcode: 365204. pp 41. 

USEPA. 2010. Drinking Water Assessment for Fomesafen Use on Pepper. DP Barcode: 

373599, 373601. pp11
#### § 263.4 Records disposal.

All disposals of records containing sensitive information, i.e. transfers to records storage centers, destruction, transfers external to the USPS, and maintenance of accounting records regarding such disposal, must be accomplished in accordance with procedures issued by the Records Office.

[40 FR 45722, Oct. 2, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 57344, Nov. 15, 1995. Redesignated and amended at 64 FR 41290, July 30, 1999; 68 FR 56558, Oct. 1, 2003]
Exhibit 10.1


 








 


 


 


January 24, 2017


 


Micronet Enertec Technologies,
Inc.


Attention: David Lucatz


28 West Grand Avenue,
Suite 3


Montvale, NJ 07645


Email: david@micronet-enertec.com


 


		Re:	Supplemental Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated December 22, 2016 among
YA II PN, Ltd. (the “Investor”), Micronet Enertec Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), and
Enertec Electronics Ltd. (“Enertec”). 



 


Dear Mr. Lucatz,


 


The
letter shall clarify the obligations of the parties regarding the payment of the $50,000 of the commitment fee set forth in Section
2.4 of the Supplemental Agreement or any other similar fee under the Supplemental Agreement. The Investor, Enertec and the Company
hereby agree as follows:


 


		1)	The decision whether to pay any commitment fees in connection with the Supplement Agreement (including
the aforementioned amount) in cash or in shares shall be at the sole discretion of the Company.



 


		2)	If the Company elects to pay the fee in shares (in whole or in part) then the number of shares
to be issued shall be determined based on a value for the shares equal to the average of the daily closing price for each of the
5 consecutive trading days prior to the due date of the payments.



 


		3)	If the Company elects to pay the fee in shares (in whole or in part) then in no event shall the
number of shares issuable by the Company (i) cause the aggregate number of shares of common stock beneficially owned (as calculated
pursuant to Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) by the Investor and its affiliates to exceed 4.99% of the then outstanding common
stock, or (ii) cause the Company to breach the Nasdaq 20% limitation or any Nasdaq rules and regulations.



  


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	/s/ David
Gonzales
	 	Name: David
Gonzales
Title:
General counsel



 


Agreed and accepted
on this 24 day of January, 2017





	Micronet Enertec Technologies, Inc.



	Enertec Electronics Ltd.
	 	 
	/s/ David Lucatz		/s/ Tali Dinar
	Name: David Lucatz

                                                Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
	Name: Tali Dinar



Title: Chief Financial
Officer







 


 


 


 


 





{N0483961; 2}1012 Springfield Ave.,
Mountainside, NJ | 201.985.8300 | www.yorkvilleadvisors.com


New Jersey | London
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

Harry Kletter and
Alan L. Schroering, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of Industrial Services of America, Inc., hereby certify
as of this 2nd day of May, 2011, that the Form 10-Q for the Quarter
ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Industrial Services of America, Inc.

| |                                            
| | -------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Harry Kletter                          
| |                                            
| | Harry Kletter, Chief Executive Officer     
| |                                            
| | /s/ Alan L. Schroering                     
| |                                            
| | Alan L. Schroering, Chief Financial Officer

---
§ 102-42.65 What happens if the Commission on Art and Antiquities does not dispose of a gift or decoration? If the Commission on Art and Antiquities does not dispose of a gift or decoration, then it must be reported to GSA for disposal. If GSA does not dispose of a gift or decoration within one year of the Commission's reporting, the Commission may: ( a ) Request that GSA return the gift or decoration and dispose of it itself; or
( b ) Continue to allow GSA to dispose of the gift or decoration in accordance with this part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6027

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DAMIAN G. BEY, a/k/a Damien Giovanni Bey, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior 

District Judge. (5:03-cr-00252-BR-1; 5:05-cv-00323) 

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 1, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit 

Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Damian G. Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Jude Darrow, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Damian G. Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his motion seeking reconsideration of 

the denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) 

(2006); see Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Bey has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny Bey’s motion for transmittal of records, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Natoma

Manors

Bay

Heights

Golden Pines

North

Grove

Shorecrest

Bay Point

Miami International Airport

Morningside

Grapeland Heights

Little Havana Dodge Island

Shenandoah

Virginia Key

Auburndale

Liberty City

Silver Bluff

Wynwood

Little River

Downtown

The Roads

Allapattah

Little Haiti

Overtown

Flagami

Brickell

Omni

C

O

C

O

N

U

T

G

R

O

V

E

pU

ep Er sa St edi

r et a wegdE

2

0

1

3

Pla

n

Districts

12345

Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM Document 173-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 1
§ 3020.118 Production of documents. ( a ) *Service and contents.* ( 1 ) In the interest of expedition and limited to information which appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, any participant may serve on any other participant a request to produce and permit the participant making the request, or someone acting on behalf of the participant, to inspect and copy any designated documents or things that constitute or contain matters, not privileged, that are relevant to the subject matter involved in the proceeding and that are in the custody or control of the respondent.
( 2 ) The request shall set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or category, and describe each item and category with reasonable particularity, and shall specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making inspection. The participant requesting the production of documents or items shall file its request with the Commission in conformance with part 3010, subpart B, of this chapter.
( b ) *Answers.* ( 1 ) The respondent shall file an answer to a request under paragraph (a) of this section with the Commission in conformance with subpart B to part 3010 of this chapter within seven days after the request is filed, or within such other period as may be fixed by the Commission or presiding officer. The answer shall state, with respect to each item or category, whether inspection will be permitted as requested.
( 2 ) If the respondent objects to an item or category, it shall state the reasons for objection in a motion to be excused from answering as prescribed by paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Motions to be excused from answering.* A respondent may, in lieu of answering a request for production, file a motion pursuant to § 3020.105(b) to be excused from answering.
**
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. 

American Express Credit Account Master Trust 

Reporting Period January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“TRS”), as Servicer pursuant to theFourth Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2018 (as so amended and restated and as otherwise amended from time to time, the “Agreement”), among American Express Receivables Financing CorporationIII LLC, as transferor, TRS, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee and securities intermediary (the “Trustee”), does hereby certify that: 

 
1.
TRS is the Servicer under the Agreement. 

 
2.
The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver thisCertificate. 

 
3.
A review of the Servicer’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under my supervision. 

 
4.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed thisCertificate this 21st day of March, 2024. 

AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.

 
By: 
/s/ Gwyneth Gittings
Name: Gwyneth GittingsTitle: Vice President**
#### § 102-42.35 Can the employing agency be reimbursed for transfers of gifts and decorations?

No, all transfers of gifts and decorations to Federal agencies or donation through SASPs will be without reimbursement. However, the employing agency may require the receiving agency to pay all or part of the direct costs incurred by the employing agency in packing, preparation for shipment, loading, and transportation.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

                      Pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alcan Inc. (the "Company"), herebycertifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: 9 November 2005                                                     

 

                                                                                         /s/ MichaelHanley                           

                                                                                         Michael Hanley

Executive VicePresident and 

Chief FinancialOfficer
1:22-mj-02754-AOR

Case 1:22-cr-20460-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 105-72.802 Subsequent adjustments and continuing responsibilities. ( a ) The closeout of an award does not affect any of the following. ( 1 ) The right of the Federal awarding agency to disallow costs and recover funds on the basis of a later audit or other review.
( 2 ) The obligation of the recipient to return any funds due as a result of later refunds, corrections, or other transactions.
( 3 ) Audit requirements in § 105-72.306.
( 4 ) Property management requirements in §§ 105-72.401 through 105-72.407.
( 5 ) Records retention as required in § 105-72.603.
( b ) After closeout of an award, a relationship created under an award may be modified or ended in whole or in part with the consent of the Federal awarding agency and the recipient, provided the responsibilities of the recipient referred to in § 105-72.803(a), including those for property management as applicable, are considered and provisions made for continuing responsibilities of the recipient, as appropriate.