alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






FIRST AMENDMENT 
TO THE CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
MANAGEMENT STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 
(As Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2017)


WHEREAS, the stockholders of CIRCOR International, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the establishment of the 2019 CIRCOR International, Inc. Stock Option and Incentive Plan at its 2019 stockholders’ meeting on May 9, 2019;  
WHEREAS, CIRCOR’S stockholders authorized the use of the share reserve under the 2019 Plan to grant restricted stock units in connection with the CIRCOR International, Inc. Management Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Company is authorized to take all necessary and appropriate actions to establish the 2019 Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of the date set forth below as follows:
1.    The last two sentences of Article I of the Plan are hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with following: 
“RSUs were granted under the Company’s Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan with respect to amounts deferred under the Plan before April 30, 2014 and the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan for amounts deferred under the Plan on and after April 30, 2014 but before May 9, 2019.  RSUs granted after May 9, 2019 in connection with the Plan shall be charged against, and subject to, the CIRCOR International, Inc. Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2019 Incentive Plan”).  All capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the 2019 Incentive Plan unless otherwise specified herein.”
2.    All other terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan remain unchanged and in full force and effect as provided for in the Plan.
Executed this 25th day of September, 2019 by a duly authorized officer of CIRCOR International, Inc. 


CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
 


		
	By:
	/s/ Kevin Chapman             


Kevin Chapman 
Secretary
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 58

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that distributions

from qualified State tuition programs which are used to pay educational

expenses shall not be includible in gross income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. BACHUS (for himself, Mr. RILEY, Mr. ADERHOLT, and Mr. EVERETT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that distributions from qualified State tuition programs

which are used to pay educational expenses shall not

be includible in gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘College Savings Pro5 tection Act’’.
2

•HR 58 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF DISTRIBU2 TIONS FROM QUALIFIED STATE TUITION

3 PROGRAMS WHICH ARE USED FOR EDU4 CATIONAL PURPOSES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section

6 529(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend7 ed to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(B) DISTRIBUTIONS FOR QUALIFIED

9 HIGHER EDUCATION EXPENSES.—Subpara10 graph (A) shall not apply to any distribution to

11 the extent—

12 ‘‘(i) the distribution is used exclusively

13 to pay qualified higher education expenses

14 of the distributee, or

15 ‘‘(ii) the distribution consists of pro16 viding a benefit to the distributee which, if

17 paid for by the distributee, would con18 stitute payment of a qualified higher edu19 cation expense.’’

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

21 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

22 December 31, 1998.

Æ
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
operations of Allied.
 /s/ Deborah F. Ricci
    
    /s/ John J. MarcelloDeborah F. Ricci
    
    John J. MarcelloChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    
    Chief Executive Officer and PresidentMay 15, 2009
    
    May 15, 2009
Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 117-8   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 117-8   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 12
                        AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
           Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (in millions)

                                            Three Months     Six Months
                                           Ended June 30,  Ended  June 30,
                                           2007    2006    2007     2006

Earnings (loss):
 Earnings (loss) before income taxes        $271    $280   $  322   $  174

 Add: Total fixed charges (per below)        418     426      852      845

 Less:  Interest capitalized                   5       7       14       14
   Total earnings before income taxes       $684    $699   $1,160   $1,005

Fixed charges:
 Interest                                   $203    $211   $  410   $  418

 Portion of rental expense
  representative of the interest factor      212     212      436      419


 Amortization of debt expense                  3       3        6        8
    Total fixed charges                     $418    $426   $  852   $  845

 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges         1.64    1.64     1.36     1.19


Note:As  of  June  30, 2007, American has guaranteed approximately
     $1.1  billion  of  AMR's  unsecured  debt  and approximately  $368
     million  of  AMR  Eagle's  secured  debt. The impact of these
     unconditional guarantees is not included in the above computation.
#### § 102-85.50 When does availability of funding have to be certified?

The customer agency must sign an OA prior to GSA's making any major contractual commitments associated with the space request. Typically, this should occur at the earliest possible opportunity-i.e., when funds become available. However, in no event shall certification occur later than just prior to the award of the contract to a design architect in the case of Federal construction or renovation in Federally owned space or prior to the award of a lease. This serves as a customer agency's funding commitment unless certification is provided on another document.
EXHIBIT 99.3

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ITS Networks Inc.
(the  Company)  for  the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  Report), the
undersigned  President  Officer  and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each
hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  January  13,  2003


                                           /s/Gustavo  Gomez
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Gustavo  Gomez
                                              President  and  Treasurer



                                           /s/Martin-Luis  Becerra
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Martin-Luis  Becerra
                                              Principal Accounting and Financial
                                                Officer
#### § 102-118.65 Can my agency receive electronic billing for payment of transportation services?

Yes, when mutually agreeable to the agency and the GSA Transportation Audits Division, your agency is encouraged to use electronic billing for the procurement and billing of transportation services.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32324, May 31, 2022]
#### § 105-56.011 Non-waiver of rights.

An employee's involuntary payment of all or any portion of a debt being collected under 5 U.S.C. 5514 will not be construed as a waiver of any rights which the employee may have under 5 U.S.C. 5514 or any other provision of contract or law unless there are statutory or contractual provisions to the contrary.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


BESTWAY, INC.                                                          FORM 10-Q

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                OF BESTWAY, INC.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended October 31, 2003 of Bestway, Inc.
(the "Issuer").

I, David A. Kraemer, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to
the best of my knowledge:

         (i)      the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.

Date: December 15, 2003                            By: /s/ David A. Kraemer
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Name: David A. Kraemer


Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 15th day of December, 2003.

/s/ Jeanne A. Andress
--------------------------------------------
Name: Jeanne A. Andress
     ---------------------------------------
Title: Notary Public

My commission expires: 4/13/2006
                      ----------------------
§ 102-42.40 When is an appraisal necessary? An appraisal is necessary when— ( a ) An employee indicates an interest in purchasing a gift or decoration. In this situation, the appraisal must be obtained before the gift or decoration is reported to GSA for screening (see 102-42.20); or
( b ) GSA requires the employing agency to obtain an appraisal of a gift or decoration that the agency has retained for official use and no longer needs before accepting the agency's report of the item as excess personal property; or
( c ) The policy of one's own agency requires it, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7342(g).
Note to § 102-42.40 paragraphs ( a
) and ( b
):
Refer to § 102-42.50 for how appraisals under these two situations are handled.
[74 FR 2396, Jan. 15, 2009]
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 609

To amend the Export Apple and Pear Act to limit the applicability of

the Act to apples.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. WALDEN of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Export Apple and Pear Act to limit the

applicability of the Act to apples.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SCOPE OF EXPORT APPLE AND PEAR ACT.

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—The Act of June 10, 1933 (7

5 U.S.C. 581 et seq.; commonly known as the Export Apple

6 and Pear Act), is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new section:

8 ‘‘SEC. 11. This Act may be cited as the ‘Export Apple

9 Act’.’’.
2

•HR 609 IH

1 (b) DEFINITION OF APPLES.—Section 9 of such Act

2 (7 U.S.C. 589) is amended by striking paragraph (4) and

3 inserting the following new paragraph:

4 ‘‘(4) The term ‘apples’ means fresh whole apples,

5 whether or not the apples have been in storage.’’.

6 (c) ELIMINATION OF REFERENCES TO PEARS.—Such

7 Act is further amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘and/or pears’’ each place it ap9 pears in the first section and sections 5 and 6; and

10 (2) by striking ‘‘or pears’’ each place it appears

11 in the first section and sections 2, 3, and 4.

Æ
§ 102-75.340 Where hazardous substance activity has been identified on property proposed for disposal, what information must the disposal agency incorporate into the offer to purchase and the conveyance document? Where the existence of hazardous substance activity has been brought to the attention of the disposal agency by the Report of Excess Real Property (Standard Form 118) information provided (see §§ 102-75.125 and 102-75.130), the disposal agency must incorporate this information into any offer to purchase and conveyance document. In any offer to purchase and conveyance document, disposal agencies, generally, must also address the following (specific recommended language that addresses the following issues can be found in the GSA Customer Guide to Real Property Disposal): ( a ) Notice of all hazardous substance activity identified as a result of a complete search of agency records by the landholding agency.
( b ) A statement, certified by a responsible landholding agency official in the Report of Excess Real Property, that all remedial actions necessary to protect human health and the environment with regard to such hazardous substance activity have been taken (this is not required in the offer to purchase or conveyance document in the case of a transfer of property under the authority of section 120(h)(3)(C) of CERCLA, or the Early Transfer Authority, or a conveyance to a “potentially responsible party”, as defined by CERCLA (see 102-75.345)).
( c ) A commitment, on behalf of the United States, to return to correct any hazardous condition discovered after the conveyance that results from hazardous substance activity prior to the date of conveyance.
( d ) A reservation by the United States of a right of access in order to accomplish any further remedial actions required in the future.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.21 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

For additional information, see related documents published at 47 FR 57369, Dec. 23, 1982, 48 FR 17101, Apr. 21, 1983, and 48 FR 29096, June 24, 1983.

#### § 101-6.2105 What is the Administrator's obligation with respect to Federal interagency coordination?

The Administrator, to the extent practicable, consults with and seeks advice from all other substantially affected Federal departments and agencies in an effort to assure full coordination between such agencies and GSA regarding programs and activities covered under these regulations.
From: pfarina4@gmail.com [mailto:pfarina4@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Phil Farina

Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:05 AM

To: Jordan, Ronald; Flanders, Phillip

Cc: Mark J. Kropilak Esq.

Subject: Liberty Hydro Patent

As you are aware Liberty Hydro has received a patent for our ZVI Blue technology for 

the management of certain contaminants in waste waters. As per your request I have 

attached a copy of the patent.

If you have any further questions or need any additional information please feel free to 

contact me directly.

Phil Farina

Sales Executive

Liberty Hydro

Phil.farina@libertyhydro.com

419-346-8848
**
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. 

American Express Credit Account Master Trust 

Reporting Period January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“TRS”), as Servicer pursuant to theFourth Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2018 (as so amended and restated and as otherwise amended from time to time, the “Agreement”), among American Express Receivables Financing CorporationIII LLC, as transferor, TRS, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee and securities intermediary (the “Trustee”), does hereby certify that: 

 
1.
TRS is the Servicer under the Agreement. 

 
2.
The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver thisCertificate. 

 
3.
A review of the Servicer’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under my supervision. 

 
4.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed thisCertificate this 24th day of March, 2022. 

AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.

 

By:
 
/s/Amiy A. Amitabh

Name:
 
Amiy A. Amitabh

Title:
 
Vice President

 
**
AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION 10-Q

EXHIBIT 31(a)

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATIONS

|I, Carl H. Lindner, certify that:
|---------------------------------
|                                 
|1.                               
|                                 
|2.                               
|                                 
|3.                               
|                                 
|4.                               
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|5.                               
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|November 10, 2003                
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 



E-2
#### § 101-25.104-1 Redistribution, repair, or rehabilitation.

Prior to the purchase of new office furniture and office machines, agencies shall fulfill needs insofar as practicable through redistribution, repair, or rehabilitation of already owned furniture and office machines. In furtherance of the use of rehabilitated furniture and office machines, agencies shall review inventories on a continuing basis to ascertain those items which can be economically rehabilitated and institute programs for their orderly repair and rehabilitation. All such items which are not required for immediate needs shall be reported as excess.

[42 FR 1031, Jan. 5, 1977]
#### § 102-75.515 What action must the disposal agency take after an eligible public agency has submitted a plan of use for property for an educational or public health requirement?

When an eligible public agency submits a plan of use for property for an educational or public health requirement, the disposal agency must transmit two copies of the plan to the regional office of ED or HHS, as appropriate. The ED or HHS must submit to the disposal agency, within 30 calendar days after the date the plan is transmitted, a recommendation for assignment of the property to the Secretary of ED or HHS, as appropriate, or must inform the disposal agency, within the 30-calendar day period, that a recommendation will not be made for assignment of the property to ED or HHS. If, after considering other uses for the property, the disposal agency approves the assignment recommendation from ED or HHS, it must assign the property by letter or other document to the Secretary of ED or HHS, as appropriate. The disposal agency must furnish to the landholding agency a copy of the assignment, unless the landholding agency is also the disposal agency. If the recommendation is disapproved, the disposal agency must likewise notify the appropriate Department.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-02-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,965
<PP&E>                                           5,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,178
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,596
<SALES>                                         84,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,626
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    21
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,128
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,473
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,655
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (203)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,452
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
#### § 102-74.355 With what accident and fire prevention standards must Federal facilities comply?

To the maximum extent feasible, Federal agencies must manage facilities in accordance with the accident and fire prevention requirements identified in § 102-80.80 of this chapter.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

DAVID M. WILLIAMS, § 

 § No. 347, 2014 

Defendant-Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court 

 § of the State of Delaware in and 

 v. § for New Castle County 

 § 

STATE OF DELAWARE, § 

 § Cr. ID Nos. 9803018202A 

Plaintiff-Below, § 9803018202B 

Appellee. § 

Submitted: July 15, 2014 

Decided: July 17, 2014 

 O R D E R 

This 17th day of July 2014, it appears to the Court that on June 27, 

2014, David M. Williams filed a notice of appeal seeking “review” of the 

“Rule 61” dated “6-11-14” in Cr. ID Nos. 9803018202A and 9803018202B. 

On June 30, 2014, the Clerk issued a notice under Supreme Court Rule 29(b) 

directing that Williams show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed 

“for this Court’s lack of jurisdiction because it appears no final order was 

entered on June 11, 2014 in the Superior Court.” Williams did not respond 

to the notice to show cause. Under Supreme Court Rule 3(b)(2), Williams’ 

failure to respond to the notice to show cause is deemed to be his consent to 

the dismissal of this appeal. 
2 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 

3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. 

 Chief Justice